Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
string
snippet
string
answer
string
answerGenerated
string
dataset
string
snippet_percentage
int64
temperature
float64
model
string
gold_standard_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_llama
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string
__index_level_0__
int64
question_llama_emb
string
answerGenerated_llama_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon_llama_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_llama_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma_llama_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_llama_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral_llama_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_llama_emb
string
question_falcon_emb
string
answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_llama_falcon_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama_falcon_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma_falcon_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_falcon_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral_falcon_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_falcon_emb
string
question_mistral_emb
string
answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_llama_mistral_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama_mistral_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon_mistral_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_mistral_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma_mistral_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_mistral_emb
string
question_gemma_emb
string
answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_llama_gemma_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama_gemma_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon_gemma_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_gemma_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral_gemma_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_gemma_emb
string
"What does the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 require(...TRUNCATED)
"AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose (...TRUNCATED)
"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, as outlined in t(...TRUNCATED)
"response: According to the provided Airworthiness Directive, the CASA delegate requires that the fo(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.870013
null
null
"**Question:** What action does the CASA delegate require to be taken in relation to the Beechcraft (...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\n**Answer:** The CASA delegate requires that the action set out in the requirement sectio(...TRUNCATED)
"What actions must be taken, in accordance with the Airworthiness Directive, for Beechcraft 300 Seri(...TRUNCATED)
"In accordance with the provided Airworthiness Directive (AD), Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes must(...TRUNCATED)
"What safety checks and repairs must be carried out on Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes in order to (...TRUNCATED)
"In order to comply with the Airworthiness Directive, the safety checks and repairs required for the(...TRUNCATED)
4
"[0.60205078125, -0.3916015625, 0.966796875, -1.9638671875, -0.64013671875, -0.236328125, 0.76806640(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.363037109375, -1.3857421875, 0.96337890625, -0.1727294921875, -0.1219482421875, 0.40625, 1.31640(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.99560546875, -0.335205078125, 0.9482421875, -0.50439453125, -0.314697265625, 0.1051025390625, 1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.76025390625, -0.83056640625, 0.1544189453125, -0.435791015625, -0.607421875, -0.1214599609375, 0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.029296875, -0.61572265625, 0.912109375, -0.7216796875, -0.3779296875, 0.015899658203125, 0.52197(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.8271484375, -0.55126953125, 1.6943359375, -0.1456298828125, -0.0650634765625, 0.378662109375, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.59375, -0.52734375, 1.255859375, -0.497802734375, -0.282958984375, 0.517578125, 1.44140625, -0.3(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.80859375, -0.986328125, 1.39453125, -0.54150390625, -0.1878662109375, 0.88525390625, 1.60546875,(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"What is the definition of a non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannua(...TRUNCATED)
"non‑member spouse means a non‑member spouse within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Fa(...TRUNCATED)
"Under the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is defined as a (...TRUNCATED)
"According to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is define(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.960884
null
null
"**Question:** What does the Family Law Act 1975 define splitting agreements, splitting orders and s(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\n**Answer:**\n\nThe Family Law Act 1975 defines splitting agreements, splitting orders an(...TRUNCATED)
"What does the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth) define as a non-member spouse, a (...TRUNCATED)
"According to the provided snippet from the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a \(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the definition of a non-member spouse according to the Military Superannuation and Benefits(...TRUNCATED)
"A non-member spouse, according to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), is a spo(...TRUNCATED)
9
"[1.2490234375, -0.1959228515625, 0.51171875, -0.385986328125, -1.3603515625, 0.0694580078125, 1.868(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.384765625, -0.89990234375, 1.3203125, -0.2235107421875, -1.857421875, 0.390625, 2.04296875, -0.7(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1171875, -0.4208984375, 0.42578125, -0.361328125, -1.251953125, -0.0975341796875, 1.4287109375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1943359375, -0.7822265625, 0.7900390625, -0.403564453125, -1.279296875, 0.455078125, 1.752929687(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2392578125, -0.72900390625, 0.94580078125, -0.4296875, -0.95703125, 0.2249755859375, 1.333984375(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2587890625, -0.295654296875, 0.75439453125, -0.25, -1.2080078125, 0.189208984375, 1.599609375, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.15234375, -0.488525390625, 0.67919921875, -0.833984375, -1.431640625, 0.4287109375, 2.310546875,(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.9052734375, -0.7998046875, 0.9912109375, -0.81103515625, -1.5732421875, 0.28271484375, 1.2431640(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"Who were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron(...TRUNCATED)
"ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA V402 OF 1999 BETWEEN: HOPE DOWNS MA(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1652, the (...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the given snippet, the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty (...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.902567
null
null
"**Question:** What are the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)
"Who are the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)
"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)
"What were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley Ir(...TRUNCATED)
"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd(...TRUNCATED)
14
"[1.958984375, -0.9853515625, 0.147216796875, -0.9111328125, 0.30419921875, -0.2890625, 0.4968261718(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.56201171875, -0.73095703125, -0.1397705078125, -0.364013671875, -0.1744384765625, 0.455322265625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.9814453125, -1.0390625, 0.05816650390625, -0.875, 0.40087890625, -0.190185546875, 0.6015625, 0.1(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.6572265625, -0.74365234375, 0.0684814453125, -0.2164306640625, -0.408447265625, 0.5107421875, -0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7470703125, -1.0556640625, 0.377197265625, -0.93798828125, 0.2626953125, -0.07958984375, 0.50097(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0634765625, -0.63720703125, 0.2430419921875, -0.10302734375, 0.0858154296875, 0.44482421875, 0.0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8720703125, -1.1748046875, 0.443603515625, -0.880859375, 0.1920166015625, -0.06982421875, 0.6928(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.86669921875, -0.798828125, 0.00360870361328125, -0.71875, -0.41162109375, 0.158935546875, 0.2800(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Pol(...TRUNCATED)
"13His Honour noted in his judgment that there is a specific provision of the Legal Aid Commission A(...TRUNCATED)
"In the decision of Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, it was noted that the purpose(...TRUNCATED)
"According to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose behind (...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.97599
null
null
"**Question:** What is the purpose of the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decis(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe purpose of the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Poli(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the purpose of awarding costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of Police v(...TRUNCATED)
"The purpose of awarding costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of Police v Horsfie(...TRUNCATED)
What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings?
"The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings is to indemnify a successful party again(...TRUNCATED)
19
"[1.294921875, -0.77099609375, 0.206787109375, -0.6494140625, -0.50830078125, 0.1163330078125, 1.542(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3779296875, -0.478515625, 0.214599609375, -0.349365234375, -0.64453125, 0.63134765625, 0.9282226(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.447265625, -1.7197265625, 1.1943359375, 0.3388671875, -1.064453125, -0.208251953125, 1.233398437(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7578125, -1.1767578125, 0.8681640625, 0.368896484375, -0.89599609375, 0.119140625, 0.73095703125(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.353515625, -0.70361328125, 0.1085205078125, -0.6669921875, -0.253662109375, 0.163330078125, 1.14(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.36328125, -0.35205078125, 0.350341796875, -0.1324462890625, -0.54296875, 0.403076171875, 0.84619(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.275390625, -0.74072265625, 0.2841796875, -0.642578125, -0.394775390625, 0.435302734375, 1.401367(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.13671875, -1.2490234375, 0.58544921875, -0.2489013671875, -0.99609375, 0.830078125, 1.5078125, -(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)
"REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 25 September 2001, the applicants filed an application and accompanying s(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666, the Court refused the applicants(...TRUNCATED)
"task: Predict the outcome of the applicant's application for interlocutory relief in the case of Mo(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.695369
null
null
"**Question:** What was the outcome of the applicant's application for interlocutory relief in the c(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe outcome of the applicant's application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the outcome of the applicant's application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)
"The applicant in the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666 applied for interlo(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the outcome of the applicant's application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)
"The outcome of the applicant's application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused the (...TRUNCATED)
24
"[1.9306640625, -1.0380859375, 0.1602783203125, -0.366943359375, -0.419677734375, -0.1375732421875, (...TRUNCATED)
"[2.27734375, -1.505859375, 0.60693359375, -0.1348876953125, -1.4248046875, 0.66748046875, 1.0888671(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.0390625, -0.97998046875, 0.384521484375, -0.305908203125, -0.833984375, -0.373291015625, 1.13769(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.91015625, -1.8154296875, 0.5458984375, 0.51708984375, -0.98193359375, 0.127197265625, 1.09082031(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8388671875, -0.8935546875, 0.139404296875, -0.64892578125, -0.396728515625, -0.227783203125, 0.8(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.837890625, -0.9521484375, 0.54150390625, -0.491943359375, -0.75439453125, 0.327880859375, 0.7495(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.111328125, -1.0595703125, 0.416748046875, -0.53076171875, -0.908203125, -0.021240234375, 1.09375(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.26953125, -1.6376953125, 0.494873046875, -0.1806640625, -1.490234375, 0.68603515625, 0.828125, -(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Dete(...TRUNCATED)
"Schedule 1 (section 4) Part 1 Specifications of coins Item Denomination Standard composition Standa(...TRUNCATED)
"According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the $2 coin is (...TRUNCATED)
"response: According to Schedule 1 (section 4) of the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.921828
null
null
"\"\n\n**Question:** What are the specifications for the $1 and $2 coins as described in Schedule 1 (...TRUNCATED)
"The text describes the specifications for the $1 and $2 coins, including their denomination, compos(...TRUNCATED)
"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as outlined in Schedule 1 (section 4) of the Cur(...TRUNCATED)
"The $1 coin has a denomination of 1 dollar, a standard composition of silver with a minimum purity (...TRUNCATED)
"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins according to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint(...TRUNCATED)
"The $1 and $2 coins in Australia have different specifications. The $1 coin is made of copper, alum(...TRUNCATED)
29
"[0.67138671875, -0.06536865234375, -0.13818359375, -0.3955078125, -0.429443359375, 0.130859375, 1.1(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.62158203125, -0.06024169921875, -0.287841796875, 0.048797607421875, -0.8310546875, 0.06408691406(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.96923828125, -0.54638671875, 0.2230224609375, -0.36328125, -0.66845703125, 0.26025390625, 1.3984(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.328125, -0.2763671875, -0.6591796875, -0.09442138671875, -0.73681640625, 0.1185302734375, 1.2177(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.24658203125, -0.65380859375, -0.30859375, -0.10418701171875, -0.83740234375, 0.5927734375, 1.249(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.69189453125, -1.0234375, 0.01526641845703125, 0.12371826171875, -0.8154296875, 0.482421875, 1.65(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0283203125, -0.50390625, 0.1156005859375, -0.02801513671875, -0.76904296875, 0.314453125, 1.5156(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.74267578125, -0.521484375, -0.430908203125, 0.1505126953125, -0.74755859375, -0.61865234375, 1.6(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)
"4 When the matter was before the magistrate, the appellant apparently argued the decision of the Tr(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the given snippet, the appellant in the case NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultur(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.956008
null
null
"**Question:** What was the main argument of the appellant in the case NABC v Minister for Immigrati(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe appellant in the case NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous A(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the reason the court dismissed the appellant's appeal in the case NABC v Minister for Immi(...TRUNCATED)
"The appellant in the case NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [200(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the grounds on which the appellant in the case NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicul(...TRUNCATED)
"The grounds on which the appellant in the case NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & In(...TRUNCATED)
34
"[2.123046875, -0.712890625, 0.050994873046875, -1.2138671875, -0.89453125, -0.410888671875, 0.62548(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.0625, -1.2451171875, 0.258544921875, -0.400390625, -0.9833984375, 0.4091796875, 0.4501953125, -0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.96484375, -1.05859375, 0.452392578125, -0.76513671875, -0.97998046875, -0.12158203125, 0.6040039(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.50390625, -1.302734375, 0.70751953125, -0.404296875, -0.9892578125, 0.61767578125, 0.728515625, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.908203125, -0.71240234375, 0.07904052734375, -1.0654296875, -0.0904541015625, -0.436279296875, 0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6162109375, -0.67626953125, -0.0217132568359375, -0.56982421875, -0.5771484375, 0.03424072265625(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.134765625, -0.7197265625, 0.412353515625, -0.57861328125, -0.515625, -0.27587890625, 0.819335937(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.333984375, -1.0322265625, 0.87939453125, -0.36962890625, -1.0048828125, 0.75634765625, 0.2810058(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"In the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, was the claim put forward by Mr Reyn(...TRUNCATED)
"20. For these reasons, it is not necessary to address the further question, to which the parties de(...TRUNCATED)
"No, in the matter of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the court did not consider the(...TRUNCATED)
"in this scenario, no! According to the snippet, the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds did not abuse (...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.784275
null
null
"**Question:** Does Mr Reynolds' claim give rise to an abuse of process by reason of duplication of (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nMr Reynolds' claim did not give rise to an abuse of process by reason of duplication of (...TRUNCATED)
"\"Did Mr Reynolds' claim in this case constitute an abuse of process due to an overlap or duplicati(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the provided snippet from the court decision, Mr Reynolds' claim did not constitute an abu(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the proper scope of the issue to be addressed in the Expedition List Proceedings, given the(...TRUNCATED)
"In light of the information provided, the proper scope of the issue to be addressed in the Expediti(...TRUNCATED)
39
"[1.3095703125, -1.3994140625, 0.11279296875, -0.60009765625, -0.90283203125, 0.354736328125, 0.6518(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.037109375, -1.091796875, 1.2548828125, -0.062103271484375, -1.2353515625, 0.36376953125, 0.58105(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.400390625, -1.0556640625, 1.5634765625, -0.1356201171875, -0.82568359375, 0.47900390625, 0.54931(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6435546875, -1.43359375, 1.1904296875, 0.62060546875, -0.70458984375, 0.970703125, 0.8974609375,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8232421875, -1.703125, 0.55126953125, 0.0643310546875, -0.72705078125, 0.09075927734375, 0.31103(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7421875, -1.5517578125, 0.74267578125, 0.331787109375, -1.1708984375, 0.80810546875, 0.762207031(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.51171875, -1.23828125, 0.431640625, 0.294189453125, -1.0146484375, 0.662109375, 0.92919921875, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.677734375, -1.2431640625, 0.68212890625, 0.17529296875, -1.2138671875, 0.986328125, 1.0390625, -(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"What was the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC (...TRUNCATED)
"remarks on sentence 1. On 13 March 2019 the offender was arraigned on an Indictment containing the (...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66, the offender was charged with recklessly dama(...TRUNCATED)
"response: According to the snippet provided, the charge against the offender in the case of R v Dav(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.936306
null
null
"**Question:** What was the charge against the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] (...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\n**Answer:** The charge against the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] (...TRUNCATED)
"What is the charge, section of law violated, and maximum penalty for the offence the offender faced(...TRUNCATED)
"The offender, David Keith Green, was charged with recklessly damaging the Corrective Services cell (...TRUNCATED)
What is the maximum penalty for the offence committed by David Keith Green in New South Wales?
"Answer: The maximum penalty for David Keith Green's offence in New South Wales is 10 years imprison(...TRUNCATED)
44
"[1.70703125, -0.270263671875, 0.317138671875, -0.62744140625, 0.0355224609375, 0.027191162109375, 1(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5703125, -0.29052734375, 0.258056640625, -0.09075927734375, -0.65234375, 0.7001953125, 0.6782226(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.361328125, -0.466796875, 0.5126953125, -0.7353515625, -0.6591796875, 0.356201171875, 0.913085937(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.251953125, -0.4560546875, 0.9296875, -0.552734375, -0.505859375, 0.1473388671875, 0.7841796875, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4248046875, -0.153076171875, 0.2291259765625, -0.5595703125, 0.2291259765625, 0.03570556640625, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.17578125, 0.2421875, 0.2125244140625, -0.250244140625, -0.1705322265625, 0.446044921875, 0.16345(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.111328125, -0.439208984375, 0.2861328125, -0.69189453125, 0.10540771484375, 0.19921875, 0.895019(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.421875, -0.1890869140625, 0.408935546875, -0.130615234375, -0.448486328125, 0.4296875, 0.5444335(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
"What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022(...TRUNCATED)
"ADDITIONAL CHARGES 20. Further police investigations revealed that the offender had signed a standa(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749, the police investigation revealed that the offender had sig(...TRUNCATED)
"Evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 includ(...TRUNCATED)
alqa
100
2
llama
0.925268
null
null
"**Question:** What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in R v Green (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in R v Green [2022] N(...TRUNCATED)
"What evidence was uncovered during the police investigation of the offender in R v Green [2022] NSW(...TRUNCATED)
"During the police investigation of the offender in R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749, additional charges w(...TRUNCATED)
"What further evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in R v Green [2022](...TRUNCATED)
"The additional evidence found during the investigation included the offender carrying multiple unre(...TRUNCATED)
49
"[1.7470703125, -0.55859375, -0.04541015625, -0.55322265625, -0.1990966796875, 0.2763671875, 0.73046(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.091796875, -0.615234375, -0.14599609375, 0.2303466796875, -0.5966796875, 0.467041015625, 0.43774(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.83203125, -0.5615234375, 0.36669921875, -0.138427734375, -0.51318359375, 0.51318359375, 0.548828(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.76708984375, -0.65380859375, -0.263427734375, -0.365478515625, -0.40966796875, 0.96435546875, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8095703125, -0.7470703125, -0.166015625, -0.4951171875, -0.062103271484375, 0.1309814453125, 0.4(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2958984375, -0.5537109375, -0.364013671875, 0.477294921875, -0.57568359375, 0.4140625, 1.1181640(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.775390625, -0.97802734375, -0.529296875, -0.2469482421875, -0.25439453125, 0.392333984375, 0.463(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3583984375, -0.88623046875, -0.1063232421875, 0.159423828125, -0.7919921875, 0.6103515625, 1.020(...TRUNCATED)
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
45