Datasets:

---

Ramitha

/

sl-contextembs-mistral

like 0

"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED)

"services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner claimed that his services were suspended on March 6, 1999, due to an incident of sho(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the reason given by the Inspector General of Police for striking the Petitioner's name off(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the reason given by the Inspector General of Police for striking (...TRUNCATED)

"The grounds for the suspension of the petitioner's services were the alleged shooting incident, whe(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the reason for the Petitioner's suspension of services on March 6, 1999, and(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe Petitioner's services were suspended on March 6, 1999, due to an incident of shootin(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Petitioner, his suspension and subsequent demobilization were in violation(...TRUNCATED)

"The petitioner claimed that he was falsely implicated in a shooting incident and was suspended. Aft(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: \"The Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.7709121704101562, 0.7668946981430054, 1.0915045738220215, -0.3064374327659607, 2.902823448181152(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.813631296157837, 0.3998943269252777, -0.24464191496372223, 0.3380472660064697, 3.967390775680542(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8102317452430725, 1.7455753087997437, -0.6149107217788696, -1.30384361743927, 3.9251441955566406(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1672158241271973, -0.33603858947753906, 0.17670421302318573, -0.8434018492698669, 3.783940553665(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.739954948425293, 0.17549367249011993, 0.07720596343278885, -0.0759623646736145, 2.45994973182678(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0415055751800537, -0.009929205290973186, 0.40040168166160583, -1.0412479639053345, 4.14114713668(...TRUNCATED)

"[5.270904064178467, 0.7022268176078796, 0.8247108459472656, -2.011455535888672, 1.5681792497634888,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8450982570648193, -1.0642192363739014, 1.3134865760803223, -1.205040454864502, 2.648050546646118(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.6674046516418457, -0.15323573350906372, -0.15104340016841888, -2.2150321006774902, 4.18778133392(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.918818712234497, 0.5606067180633545, 1.9469153881072998, -2.6345701217651367, 0.443979948759079,(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.617764472961426, -0.962127685546875, 0.9909602403640747, -0.5914303660392761, 2.7599995136260986(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.049391984939575, -1.6914348602294922, 0.22431696951389313, 0.1962553709745407, 3.581763505935669(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.797466516494751, -1.231181025505066, 1.4768726825714111, -1.4829097986221313, 2.761399507522583,(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED)

"The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED)

"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, there are two parties involved in this case: E.P.A. Premasundara and(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, what was the specific legal issue(s) raised by the appellant in the (...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the specific legal issue raised by the appellant in the Supreme Cour(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of E.P.A. Premasundara v. Kumarigama Uhana, leave to appeal was granted in relation to (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the legal case described in the provided snippet, and what are the main parti(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe legal case described in the provided snippet is an appeal against the judgment o(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED)

"In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.668245792388916, 1.9506795406341553, -0.2955102026462555, -0.57252037525177, 0.14052772521972656(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.37964072823524475, 4.311244964599609, -1.8652290105819702, -1.7932164669036865, 2.33788776397705(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5645225644111633, 3.231071710586548, -1.6539479494094849, -1.2607285976409912, 2.01615047454834,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.32840046286582947, 1.8982383012771606, -1.304435133934021, -1.6091288328170776, 2.02462196350097(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.638224720954895, 2.159508228302002, 0.8399714231491089, -1.112804651260376, -0.03069294244050979(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.7252949476242065, -0.8609148859977722, -0.7539186477661133, -4.228659629821777, 1.32062530517578(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9488596320152283, 1.2971891164779663, -1.3865976333618164, -1.8790782690048218, 3.56451725959777(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.4783589541912079, 3.2813332080841064, -1.2535243034362793, -3.6934237480163574, 1.0159111022949(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.8602062463760376, 3.4399871826171875, 0.14142942428588867, -1.7831308841705322, 3.8192875385284(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.4527059495449066, 1.0708246231079102, 0.4024951756000519, -2.2101547718048096, 4.297654151916504(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.7432382106781006, 1.7849302291870117, -1.3214088678359985, -2.01318097114563, 2.6102888584136963(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.834442377090454, 1.4034428596496582, -0.42719629406929016, -1.2613567113876343, 2.23671555519104(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.22521710395813, 1.926895260810852, -1.3542574644088745, -0.23595258593559265, 2.491783618927002,(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED)

"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court case number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was heard in connection with several law suits(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the legal issues at stake in the Supreme Court case S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 regarding the (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe legal issues at stake in the Supreme Court case S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 were:\n\n1. P(...TRUNCATED)

"What legal issues were addressed in the mentioned Supreme Court case involving Nadaraja Rajendra an(...TRUNCATED)

"In the mentioned Supreme Court case involving Nadaraja Rajendra and Thevathasan Sritharan in Colomb(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What legal issues might have been addressed in the Supreme Court case number S.C. App(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, I cannot answer the question as the text does not contain any inform(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 w(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka addressed several legal issues(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.009406566619873, 0.8218401074409485, -0.5290337800979614, -0.017912402749061584, 1.9936319589614(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.594658613204956, 3.729414224624634, -2.401832342147827, -2.1473731994628906, 1.6878812313079834,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7117047905921936, 0.8904199004173279, -2.1205685138702393, -1.1297231912612915, 2.75330877304077(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3828470706939697, 1.2110966444015503, -0.8740275502204895, -1.3800594806671143, 1.33968663215637(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4541797637939453, 2.6809449195861816, 0.21533025801181793, -2.2256579399108887, 1.86930656433105(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.1285688877105713, 0.649122953414917, 0.2469157725572586, -1.7142952680587769, 3.7683093547821045(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0034732818603516, 1.1234326362609863, 0.8433194756507874, -0.47995856404304504, 2.53956794738769(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.22465181350708, 1.741833209991455, -0.6706552505493164, -2.3905558586120605, 2.0295612812042236,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.227471113204956, 2.6008384227752686, -1.3720163106918335, -2.2452733516693115, 2.606876850128174(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8462453484535217, 0.0785287469625473, -1.143142819404602, -1.7693638801574707, 3.614631175994873(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4066717624664307, 1.2288596630096436, -1.48434579372406, -2.151949405670166, 2.1035611629486084,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.6876698732376099, 0.7631193399429321, -1.4424675703048706, -1.9575135707855225, 3.8381996154785(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.907239556312561, -1.2057090997695923, -1.0322376489639282, -2.030205011367798, 2.826215028762817(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the basis on which the Ceylinco Insurance applied to the High Court of Colombo to set asid(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet provided, the basis on which Ceylinco Insurance applied to the High Court of C(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the rationale behind the Ceylinco Insurance's application to the High Court to set aside th(...TRUNCATED)

"The rationale behind Ceylinco Insurance's application to set aside the arbitration awards is that t(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The main issue in the case before the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.876460075378418, 1.755306601524353, 1.045732021331787, -0.6103132963180542, 1.1343841552734375, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.9400760531425476, 1.3699281215667725, -1.7240854501724243, -1.7852979898452759, 4.3907794952392(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.07330448180437088, 1.5362974405288696, -1.2164126634597778, -1.64785897731781, 2.042574644088745(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.01356125995516777, 0.65180903673172, -1.4965054988861084, -2.5683510303497314, 2.679568767547607(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.7794643044471741, 0.8078106641769409, -0.5444138646125793, 0.07521309703588486, 6.2198758125305(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1316256523132324, 1.634177327156067, 1.2162173986434937, -1.5492323637008667, 1.3272680044174194(...TRUNCATED)

"[-2.344032049179077, -0.15260431170463562, -2.0597996711730957, -2.3610873222351074, 4.250713825225(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.06018621101975441, 1.5810729265213013, 0.45673254132270813, -3.70257568359375, 1.73613321781158(...TRUNCATED)

"[-1.4284616708755493, 1.047892451286316, -0.9973410367965698, 0.9103870987892151, 4.436463832855225(...TRUNCATED)

"[-2.2363741397857666, -0.3992011845111847, -2.5224814414978027, -1.5105043649673462, 3.453151941299(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.24911077320575714, 2.336111068725586, -0.07313837110996246, -3.188124656677246, 1.84787225723266(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.43827593326568604, 1.6093802452087402, 0.3540533185005188, -2.6718196868896484, 1.28536379337310(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.16200141608715057, -0.22629636526107788, -0.4430082142353058, -3.2032549381256104, 4.14903020858(...TRUNCATED)

"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED)

"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)

"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED)

"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the names of the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. A(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The names of the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. App(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the name of the four judges on the panel for the case S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 in the Democra(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the four judges on the panel were Nikawewa, Moragollagama, Paha(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Sr(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6474357843399048, 0.6964972615242004, 0.7756362557411194, -0.0732327252626419, 3.529158115386963(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.522343635559082, 3.899329423904419, -1.5287988185882568, -2.5361075401306152, 0.7912911772727966(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.463613510131836, 1.9216727018356323, -1.3451460599899292, -1.1060583591461182, 2.211231708526611(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.463613510131836, 1.9216727018356323, -1.3451460599899292, -1.1060583591461182, 2.211231708526611(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.438117742538452, 0.13574109971523285, 0.7225733995437622, -1.425629734992981, 1.9739394187927246(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.3074448108673096, 0.6242135167121887, -0.5967556834220886, -1.8385405540466309, 2.98871302604675(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2809926271438599, 1.2632331848144531, 0.4224119186401367, -0.1157897561788559, 3.290171623229980(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5784657001495361, 2.620143413543701, -1.783281683921814, -0.796110212802887, 2.2101504802703857,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.831965923309326, 1.77842378616333, -1.1379178762435913, -2.380709409713745, 1.0354260206222534, (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9404081702232361, 2.1268417835235596, -1.9826068878173828, -0.3962988257408142, 1.88248324394226(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5784657001495361, 2.620143413543701, -1.783281683921814, -0.796110212802887, 2.2101504802703857,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8991451263427734, 1.5071135759353638, -2.2024691104888916, -0.9769462943077087, 1.82613122463226(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4103114604949951, 2.1395246982574463, -1.9035618305206299, -0.8017234206199646, 1.79764318466186(...TRUNCATED)

"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED)

"SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED)

"The Respondents challenged the Petitioner's claims by relying on the marking scheme provided in the(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the criteria used by the Respondents to challenge the Petitioner's claims of additional m(...TRUNCATED)

"criteria used by the Respondents to challenge the Petitioner's claims of additional marks in the SP(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the direct relevant experience held by the petitioner in the position of Director of the Se(...TRUNCATED)

"The direct relevant experience held by the petitioner in the position of Director of the Seed and P(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the primary focus of the marking scheme criteria for awarding marks in posts (...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe primary focus of the marking scheme criteria for awarding marks in posts in the Seed(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: According to the snippet, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petit(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the criteria of direct relevant(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.5148322582244873, 0.45838403701782227, 0.3328988552093506, -0.5556311011314392, 2.11454391479492(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.909816324710846, 3.597468376159668, -1.3542767763137817, 0.023683127015829086, 3.963069200515747(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.106536388397217, 0.9568238854408264, -1.4795995950698853, -2.6058738231658936, 2.680094718933105(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4828495979309082, 1.2210720777511597, -0.2972952127456665, -1.058638095855713, 3.015774488449096(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1096216440200806, 0.4474615752696991, 0.661426842212677, -1.9116840362548828, 2.91666841506958, (...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3725366592407227, 0.40541186928749084, 1.5356789827346802, -1.2869956493377686, 2.30484509468078(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.6775546073913574, -0.9522736668586731, 1.5211268663406372, -0.9731476902961731, 3.19912505149841(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4244683980941772, 1.1696866750717163, 0.05688600242137909, -1.3347251415252686, 2.43568706512451(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1679301261901855, 0.12408671528100967, -0.10763136297464371, -2.6775898933410645, 3.784919261932(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9329270124435425, 0.8134748935699463, -1.884331464767456, -1.297325849533081, 2.641939163208008,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.757672071456909, -0.4548463523387909, -1.0591356754302979, -2.3366661071777344, 2.86423635482788(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9496558904647827, 1.2246710062026978, -1.3656376600265503, -2.58471941947937, 2.883253335952759,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.2982242107391357, -0.06339988857507706, -1.098979115486145, -2.1780648231506348, 1.5134117603302(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED)

"The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED)

"Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED)

"The appellant argued that he had prescription title to the land in question, specifically Muthuraja(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the basis of the appellant's argument regarding prescription title to the land in question(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the answer provided, the basis of the appellant's argument regarding prescript(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the basis of the appellant's claim for title to the land in question, specifically Muthuraj(...TRUNCATED)

"The basis of the appellant's claim for title to the land in question, specifically Muthurajawela, i(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the main issue in the District Court case involving the land described in Sc(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe main issue in the District Court case involving the land described in Schedule II to(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument in the District Cour(...TRUNCATED)

"The defendant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.5817885398864746, 2.3257224559783936, 0.8880720734596252, -1.3346577882766724, 5.372858047485352(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.6078605651855469, 2.2013778686523438, -2.373924493789673, 0.7517554759979248, 5.83242654800415, (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.017944097518921, 3.5845117568969727, -0.8646590113639832, -1.0038816928863525, 5.497158050537109(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.275151014328003, 2.1316328048706055, -1.3965693712234497, -0.39344456791877747, 3.83628225326538(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3505427837371826, 3.188690423965454, 0.15190783143043518, -1.4404085874557495, 2.331447124481201(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4574501514434814, 0.3950853943824768, 0.7836148738861084, -1.6773951053619385, 3.145288467407226(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.052992105484009, 2.153592824935913, 0.8843894600868225, -1.0272923707962036, 3.7938385009765625,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8324711918830872, 0.669416069984436, -1.1988075971603394, -0.3100430369377136, 4.764561653137207(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3392060995101929, 2.9833810329437256, -1.010764479637146, -2.8614141941070557, 3.031589508056640(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5131624937057495, 2.029550313949585, 0.04912169650197029, -1.0397460460662842, 4.157310485839844(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1254220008850098, 2.8762760162353516, -0.33425381779670715, -2.121932029724121, 5.63073205947876(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.877036690711975, 1.5705026388168335, 0.45291784405708313, -0.6566256284713745, 6.025970458984375(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2195475101470947, 2.262916326522827, 0.2755608856678009, -2.1703555583953857, 5.31020450592041, (...TRUNCATED)

"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED)

"She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of Section 297 of the Penal Code in Case Number SC Ap(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the given snippet and answer, what question would you ask to further clarify the issue and(...TRUNCATED)

"Please select one of the options (A-D) to ask to further clarify the issue and lead to the given an(...TRUNCATED)

"In light of the above information, the Appellant's act of assaulting the deceased with a pair of sc(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Whether the Accused-Appellant had the knowledge that her act would definitely lead to(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Accused-Appellant had no knowledge that her act would definitely lead to the death o(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court held that the Appellant's act of committing the alleged offence cannot be classif(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.975341558456421, 2.9047160148620605, 0.040127720683813095, -0.8074741363525391, 2.81976079940795(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.058722496032715, 3.889874219894409, -0.639028012752533, -1.353960394859314, 0.796196699142456, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.7821173667907715, 2.484675884246826, -0.41789790987968445, -2.5172533988952637, 1.07997250556945(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.0133986473083496, 0.0748237743973732, 0.529254674911499, -1.6487529277801514, 2.634032726287842,(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.385092258453369, 2.104341506958008, 0.28690433502197266, -0.6063346266746521, 2.2866857051849365(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.708493232727051, 2.4106557369232178, 0.41030460596084595, -2.0199551582336426, 2.214003801345825(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.867586612701416, -0.4457056224346161, -0.3387729525566101, -1.9508813619613647, 3.46184682846069(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.115772724151611, 0.7648487091064453, 0.6945191621780396, -2.0680062770843506, 2.5428922176361084(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.9306259155273438, 1.4796429872512817, 0.003756616497412324, -3.364821672439575, 1.84310674667358(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.290816068649292, 1.0648047924041748, 0.2031533569097519, -0.9360177516937256, 2.474745035171509,(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.278257846832275, 1.966468095779419, 1.000391960144043, -2.865586042404175, 2.7215750217437744, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.8114964962005615, 1.531463384628296, -0.05161069706082344, -2.3961222171783447, 1.41129362583160(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.8362600803375244, 1.7938573360443115, 0.808657169342041, -2.595609426498413, 3.2299673557281494,(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)

"have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal basis for the judge's decision in the case SC FR Application 41/2016, and how doe(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe legal basis for the judge's decision in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 is the Co(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the rationale behind the 1st Respondent's decision to deny admission to the petitioners' ch(...TRUNCATED)

"The rationale behind the 1st Respondent's decision to deny admission to the petitioners' children b(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Dem(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1104570627212524, 3.4724817276000977, -1.0680694580078125, -2.4400599002838135, 2.21065950393676(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.033918436616659164, 1.5617090463638306, -1.0276423692703247, -1.143194317817688, 3.934888839721(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.6340014934539795, 1.9942651987075806, -1.1645104885101318, -1.824273943901062, 3.38872528076171(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.623734176158905, 0.014366107061505318, 0.2723471224308014, -2.280707359313965, 3.039528608322143(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3781280517578125, -0.6142629981040955, 0.8946294784545898, -1.485796332359314, 2.936207771301269(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.470024824142456, 0.7844156622886658, 1.7500295639038086, -2.8642709255218506, 1.2977951765060425(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.601331949234009, 0.8834541440010071, -0.2832755446434021, -0.4629853665828705, 2.859275579452514(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.4364657402038574, 0.4287593960762024, 1.214146375656128, -3.557955741882324, 1.265890121459961,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5680447816848755, -1.4117987155914307, -0.040012359619140625, -1.9434313774108887, 1.59988534450(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.43496620655059814, -0.21133928000926971, -0.04718524217605591, -1.788895845413208, 3.61726689338(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.41468700766563416, 0.6052225232124329, 1.3493741750717163, -3.171586275100708, 1.15561687946319(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.12145765125751495, 1.4958099126815796, -0.5057035088539124, -1.356189489364624, 3.6987504959106(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6516095399856567, -1.4022867679595947, -0.05951793119311333, -2.9789810180664062, 3.555974960327(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED)

"Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004. The first o(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in SC Appeal No. 85/(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the proper procedure for the non-compliance of Rules 3 and 7 of the Supreme Court Rules, 19(...TRUNCATED)

"The proper procedure for non-compliance with Rules 3 and 7 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1990 in rela(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What are the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in SC Appea(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in SC Appeal No. 85(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in (...TRUNCATED)

"The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents are that the appeal is time-barred(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3160781860351562, -0.36298924684524536, -0.4241160452365875, -1.1069163084030151, 0.947704851627(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4698712825775146, 0.6416577100753784, -1.3529961109161377, 0.6187921762466431, 1.676846027374267(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.357375383377075, -0.14539943635463715, -0.07925627380609512, 1.3838481903076172, 3.1561095714569(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.490432620048523, -0.3204382061958313, -0.12716485559940338, 0.343889981508255, 2.522980213165283(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.714239239692688, -0.7194346785545349, -1.246325969696045, -0.2334154099225998, 2.347479343414306(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.236308574676514, 0.10031018406152725, -0.13072896003723145, -2.059603452682495, 1.46604704856872(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.6801795959472656, 0.6757263541221619, -0.5311008095741272, -0.8484159111976624, 1.47640192508697(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.557132601737976, -0.18603940308094025, -0.5300395488739014, -1.3859856128692627, 2.5376605987548(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7185227274894714, 0.004563606809824705, -0.37734705209732056, -0.30154332518577576, 1.3247293233(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9523349404335022, -1.2080132961273193, -0.17948250472545624, 0.3370257616043091, 1.8233666419982(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.9759156703948975, -0.45467409491539, -0.33353543281555176, -0.8309109807014465, 2.55620288848876(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.993354320526123, 0.5551925301551819, -0.5120095610618591, 1.8796842098236084, 2.204171657562256,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6610304117202759, -1.1934703588485718, 0.40233859419822693, 0.38816431164741516, 2.2459170818328(...TRUNCATED)