Datasets:

---

Ramitha

/

sl-results-40-falcon-self

like 0

"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED)

"services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with Supreme Court Case Number FR No. 556/2011 petitioner has been exonerated on Octo(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the Supreme Court case number FR No. 556/2011 regarding petitioner's suspen(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The outcome of the Supreme Court case number FR No. 556/2011 regarding the petitioner's sus(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe Petitioner's constitutional rights violated in this case were Article 12(1) and 14(1(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the petitioner's case regarding his wrongful suspension from the Police Res(...TRUNCATED)

"The petitioner in Supreme Court Case No. FR No. 556/2011 had his services suspended from the Police(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Petitioner, his suspension and subsequent demobilization were in violation(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: \"The Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was (...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 claimed that his services we(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2041015625, -0.07861328125, 0.2578125, 0.1064453125, -0.1240234375, 0.05078125, 0.06689453125, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.251953125, -0.474609375, 0.3046875, 0.16015625, -0.0732421875, 0.2001953125, 0.0218505859375, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.236328125, -0.318359375, 0.2021484375, 0.044189453125, -0.1005859375, 0.171875, -0.030517578125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.298828125, -0.43359375, 0.427734375, 0.1826171875, -0.25, 0.2177734375, 0.1474609375, 0.2890625(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.30859375, -0.1884765625, 0.333984375, 0.1552734375, -0.1669921875, 0.1162109375, 0.064453125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0128173828125, -0.169921875, 0.30859375, 0.12158203125, -0.193359375, 0.046630859375, 0.1689453(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.265625, -0.33203125, 0.318359375, 0.1298828125, -0.1943359375, 0.0289306640625, 0.039794921875,(...TRUNCATED)

"[9.059906005859375e-05, -0.1591796875, 0.2890625, -0.10986328125, -0.08251953125, 0.2431640625, -0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.41796875, -0.31640625, 0.47265625, 0.1962890625, -0.287109375, 0.1728515625, -0.2158203125, 0.4(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.38671875, -0.400390625, 0.5625, 0.306640625, -0.15234375, 0.201171875, 0.07421875, 0.1298828125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.032470703125, -0.4765625, 0.2470703125, 0.047607421875, -0.1875, 0.2177734375, -0.04150390625, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.27734375, -0.31640625, 0.2333984375, 0.0274658203125, -0.08642578125, 0.26171875, -0.115234375,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.3828125, -0.41796875, 0.392578125, 0.25, -0.1357421875, 0.18359375, 0.044921875, 0.25, 0.170898(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED)

"The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED)

"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED)

"In SC Case No. 44/2011, questions such as \"(1) the interpretation of section 367 read with Order X(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal interpretation of section 367 read with Order XVIII Rule 3 of the Uniform Civil C(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: According to the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka in SC Case No. 44/2011, the legal interpretatio(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What questions were taken notice for by the Court in SC Case No. 44/2011 through its (...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text does not mention any questions taken notice for by the Court in SC Case No. 44/20(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the specific issues addressed in SC Case No. 44/2011 regarding the interpretation of sect(...TRUNCATED)

"SC Case No. 44/2011, E.P.A. Premasundara v. Seemasahitha Galoya Medapalatha Vivida Seva Samupakara (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, there is no explicit mention of the questions of law for which leave(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1005859375, 0.0859375, 0.1923828125, 0.029541015625, -0.0791015625, -0.03564453125, 0.188476562(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.216796875, -0.298828125, 0.1650390625, -0.0810546875, -0.3046875, 0.0140380859375, -0.003082275(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1845703125, -0.318359375, 0.2177734375, 0.02978515625, -0.302734375, 0.00946044921875, 0.052001(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2353515625, -0.177734375, 0.373046875, 0.189453125, -0.1845703125, 0.271484375, -0.015747070312(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1982421875, -0.07958984375, 0.150390625, -0.01361083984375, -0.1943359375, 0.1318359375, 0.0825(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.22265625, -0.04833984375, 0.453125, 0.2392578125, -0.0218505859375, 0.0233154296875, 0.09716796(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.15234375, -0.263671875, 0.15625, 0.1767578125, -0.0026397705078125, 0.12109375, -0.09033203125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2275390625, -0.0224609375, 0.53515625, 0.1484375, -0.216796875, -0.03564453125, -0.04248046875,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.55078125, -0.109375, 0.232421875, -0.1220703125, -0.15234375, -0.0118408203125, -0.0908203125, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.248046875, -0.333984375, 0.2451171875, -0.057861328125, -0.2021484375, -0.10888671875, -0.09863(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1376953125, 0.03466796875, 0.294921875, 0.08349609375, -0.2265625, -0.1337890625, -0.0849609375(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.279296875, -0.3203125, 0.328125, -0.0654296875, -0.205078125, 0.10693359375, -0.061767578125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.16796875, -0.09521484375, 0.298828125, 0.10107421875, -0.25390625, -0.00885009765625, -0.044921(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED)

"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED)

"In <sup>CASE Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the leading judgement of Mr Abeyewardana’s judgement,(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the legal issue at the center of Mr. Abeyewardana's judgement in the <sup>CASE Number S.C.(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe legal issue at the center of Mr. Abeyewardana's judgment in the S.C. Appeal No. 8/20(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What legal issue was the leading judgement of Mr Abeyewardana’s judgement in Case N(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The text does not specify the legal issue of Mr Abeyewardana’s judgement in Case Number S(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the key legal issue in Case No. S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 regarding the rights of Sri Lankan (...TRUNCATED)

"The key legal issue in Case No. S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was not explicitly stated in the provided sn(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 w(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court case number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was a dispute between two parties identified a(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.006256103515625, -0.00848388671875, 0.337890625, 0.08740234375, -0.02392578125, -0.0242919921875(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.15234375, -0.2109375, 0.24609375, -0.050048828125, -0.24609375, 0.0106201171875, 0.11376953125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2421875, -0.019775390625, 0.224609375, 0.134765625, -0.10400390625, 0.12353515625, -0.058837890(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07763671875, -0.2138671875, 0.498046875, -0.0255126953125, -0.1328125, -0.048828125, 0.1328125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.154296875, -0.1669921875, 0.248046875, -0.08056640625, -0.1240234375, -0.07177734375, 0.2519531(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0291748046875, -0.1025390625, 0.380859375, -0.09716796875, -0.1279296875, -0.01544189453125, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.049560546875, 0.030029296875, 0.38671875, 0.0732421875, 0.0108642578125, -0.031982421875, 0.110(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0908203125, -0.04638671875, 0.26953125, -0.00433349609375, -0.1787109375, -0.0703125, 0.0751953(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1015625, -0.302734375, 0.1767578125, -0.2275390625, -0.359375, 0.034423828125, -0.123046875, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0390625, -0.1904296875, 0.484375, 0.0966796875, -0.25390625, -0.08349609375, -0.04296875, 0.445(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0177001953125, 0.01165771484375, 0.37890625, 0.0947265625, -0.1962890625, -0.087890625, -0.08349(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.333984375, -0.15234375, 0.26953125, 0.33203125, -0.046630859375, 0.16015625, -0.048095703125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1533203125, -0.16015625, 0.4375, 0.111328125, -0.2451171875, -0.01708984375, -0.0908203125, 0.5(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED)

"In 2005 a judgement came from the Supreme Court of Appeal granting 20% damages to Trico Maritime wi(...TRUNCATED)

"were the key factors considered by the court in the Ceylinco Insurance case when determining the pa(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The court in the Ceylinco Insurance case considered several key factors when determining th(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:**\n\nDoes the mentioned arbitration awards in 1999 and 2005 appear to be in accordance (...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe text does not provide information about customary (national or foreign?) precede(...TRUNCATED)

"n the provided snippet, what were the customary precedents regarding arbitration awards, as referre(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Trico Maritime vs. Ceylinco Insurance case, the customary precedents regarding arbitration a(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The main issue in the case before the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1806640625, -0.01031494140625, 0.2353515625, -0.087890625, -0.030029296875, -0.138671875, -0.00(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2177734375, -0.33984375, 0.10302734375, 0.01806640625, -0.2470703125, 0.0732421875, -0.00573730(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.228515625, -0.19140625, 0.2431640625, -0.016845703125, -0.2021484375, 0.0556640625, -0.00201416(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.004241943359375, -0.1806640625, 0.2578125, -0.033447265625, -0.09521484375, 0.053466796875, 0.2(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0859375, -0.1357421875, -0.18359375, 0.10595703125, -0.1494140625, -0.0159912109375, -0.10351562(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1259765625, -0.1630859375, 0.2236328125, 0.00994873046875, -0.10693359375, 0.08349609375, 0.0336(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.14453125, -0.11328125, 0.205078125, -0.099609375, -0.052734375, 0.06787109375, 0.003204345703125(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.038330078125, 0.111328125, 0.2412109375, 0.06787109375, -0.08544921875, 0.01611328125, -0.093261(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.02294921875, -0.1025390625, 0.0267333984375, -0.0830078125, -0.2138671875, -0.045166015625, -0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.02099609375, -0.123046875, 0.185546875, -0.236328125, -0.259765625, 0.1787109375, -0.0123901367(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1240234375, -0.03759765625, 0.314453125, -0.06982421875, -0.0654296875, -0.004913330078125, -0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1337890625, -0.052001953125, 0.228515625, -0.099609375, -0.2314453125, 0.1328125, -0.1240234375,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.107421875, -0.1552734375, 0.236328125, -0.0439453125, -0.2021484375, 0.0128173828125, -0.047851(...TRUNCATED)

"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED)

"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)

"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED)

"In `SUPREme COnSTItUTION Appeal 1/1983;` Case No SC Appeal 11/85, a case decided in `1995` was held(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in S Nicawewa, SC Appeal Case 1/2005 regar(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in S Nicawewa, SC Appeal Case 1/2005 re(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The text does not mention any constitutional rights, therefore I cannot answer this questio(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the court's findings in the case of S.C. Appeal No. 1/2005 (Nicawewa) regarding the writ (...TRUNCATED)

"I apologize for the confusion, but the provided snippet does not contain any information regarding (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED)

"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.00848388671875, -0.10595703125, 0.34375, 0.1611328125, -0.00897216796875, 0.040283203125, 0.180(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0654296875, -0.27734375, 0.19140625, -0.1435546875, -0.322265625, 0.1142578125, 0.1416015625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.126953125, -0.2890625, 0.361328125, -0.07177734375, -0.283203125, 0.035400390625, 0.10107421875(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.130859375, -0.2890625, 0.2490234375, 0.06982421875, -0.12890625, 0.185546875, 0.134765625, 0.43(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.034912109375, -0.275390625, 0.302734375, 0.051025390625, -0.1591796875, 0.10888671875, 0.184570(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.040771484375, -0.2275390625, 0.337890625, 0.2373046875, -0.03857421875, 0.01031494140625, 0.1098(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1513671875, -0.2119140625, 0.396484375, 0.138671875, -0.26171875, 0.22265625, 0.201171875, 0.23(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.10107421875, 0.021240234375, 0.055908203125, 0.04345703125, -0.25390625, -0.06591796875, -0.1953(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.294921875, -0.10107421875, 0.45703125, -0.17578125, -0.09423828125, 0.1142578125, 0.02673339843(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.306640625, -0.146484375, 0.61328125, 0.2490234375, -0.26953125, 0.1650390625, -0.01007080078125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.08837890625, -0.359375, 0.345703125, -0.08447265625, -0.234375, -0.030517578125, 0.134765625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.142578125, -0.3828125, 0.384765625, -0.04443359375, -0.263671875, 0.005584716796875, 0.12890625(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.126953125, -0.2890625, 0.361328125, -0.07177734375, -0.283203125, 0.035400390625, 0.10107421875(...TRUNCATED)

"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED)

"SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the marked criteria for the post, the respondents claimed that the petitioner ha(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the basis for the respondents' claim that the petitioner has additional marks for direct re(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The basis for the respondents' claim that the petitioner has additional marks for direct re(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the relevant criteria for awarding marks for the post of Director of the Seed(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe relevant criteria for awarding marks for the post of Director of the Seed and Planti(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the marking scheme annexed to the petition, what experience of the petitioner, aside from (...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the petitioner's experience as a Research Officer in charge of the A(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: According to the snippet, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petit(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED)

"The Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 countered the Petitioner's claim by relyin(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.052001953125, 0.045166015625, 0.3125, 0.059814453125, -0.2294921875, 0.08740234375, -0.12988281(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07275390625, -0.33203125, 0.15625, 0.1728515625, 0.1494140625, 0.034423828125, 0.208984375, 0.3(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.162109375, -0.28125, 0.28125, -0.09521484375, 0.162109375, 0.015625, 0.1279296875, 0.314453125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.07275390625, -0.384765625, 0.275390625, 0.16015625, 0.138671875, 0.0028839111328125, 0.083007812(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0732421875, -0.1630859375, 0.337890625, 0.008056640625, 0.019775390625, 0.08837890625, 0.0634765(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.083984375, -0.1767578125, 0.416015625, 0.1064453125, 0.056640625, -0.0380859375, 0.2578125, 0.2(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0162353515625, -0.29296875, 0.302734375, 0.10791015625, 0.08935546875, -0.1416015625, 0.14746093(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1005859375, -0.25, 0.3671875, -0.034423828125, 0.23046875, 0.047119140625, 0.294921875, 0.46289(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07763671875, -0.40234375, 0.2080078125, -0.0810546875, 0.2373046875, -0.11572265625, 0.14453125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1767578125, -0.251953125, 0.2578125, -0.091796875, 0.2890625, -0.2138671875, 0.0615234375, 0.35(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1904296875, -0.248046875, 0.2138671875, -0.052734375, 0.11083984375, -0.007598876953125, 0.1425(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1376953125, -0.205078125, 0.310546875, -0.00433349609375, 0.06884765625, -0.0130615234375, 0.04(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.21484375, -0.345703125, 0.2177734375, 0.014404296875, 0.072265625, -0.058837890625, 0.009277343(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED)

"The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED)

"Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the verdict mentioned in the given snippet, the defendant-appellant raised objec(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the basis of the defendant-appellant's objection to the plaintiffs' land rights according (...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the basis of the defendant-appellant's objection to the plaintiff(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the primary purpose of the respondents' action in the District Court of Nego(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe respondents' primary purpose of action in the District Court of Negombo case was to (...TRUNCATED)

"What were the arguments made by both the appellant and respondents regarding their title to the lan(...TRUNCATED)

"The respondents, as the plaintiffs in the District Court of Negombo case, argued that they had inst(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument in the District Cour(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED)

"The appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land in question, known as Muthurajawela(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1162109375, -0.06787109375, 0.263671875, 0.043701171875, -0.10791015625, 0.2216796875, 0.0708007(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.171875, -0.3671875, 0.1572265625, 0.0233154296875, -0.1865234375, 0.140625, 0.06982421875, 0.54(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.027587890625, -0.1376953125, 0.126953125, -0.049072265625, -0.076171875, -0.0311279296875, 0.15(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.052490234375, -0.11572265625, 0.59765625, 0.0172119140625, -0.1650390625, 0.11865234375, 0.1923(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.034423828125, 0.0167236328125, 0.0712890625, -0.02734375, -0.0703125, 0.109375, -0.0234375, 0.29(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.076171875, 0.2470703125, 0.4453125, 0.1806640625, 0.042236328125, -0.109375, 0.03564453125, 0.0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1337890625, -0.240234375, 0.1689453125, 0.2265625, -0.1748046875, 0.291015625, 0.1259765625, 0.2(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0169677734375, -0.15625, 0.36328125, -0.0247802734375, -0.064453125, 0.05908203125, -0.13085937(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.09814453125, -0.142578125, 0.12890625, 0.06298828125, -0.08642578125, -0.037109375, 0.170898437(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1162109375, -0.27734375, 0.220703125, -0.033447265625, -0.16015625, 0.10009765625, 0.0612792968(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0419921875, -0.1943359375, 0.2490234375, -0.004852294921875, 0.06494140625, 0.0277099609375, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.06494140625, -0.150390625, 0.26953125, 0.0263671875, 0.05615234375, -0.015625, 0.046630859375, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1396484375, -0.25, 0.11572265625, -0.038330078125, -0.1904296875, 0.034912109375, 0.12060546875(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED)

"In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED)

"She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20 and the above interpretation by th(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the given snippet and answer, what question would you generate?\n\nA) Can you explain the (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: B) In light of the Supreme Court decision in Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20, how should th(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Whether the Accused-Appellant had the knowledge that her act would definitely lead to(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Accused-Appellant had no knowledge that her act would definitely lead to the death o(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the interpretation of the Court of Appeal in Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the interpretation of the Court of Appeal in Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED)

"The Supreme Court did not directly answer the question regarding the Court of Appeal's interpretati(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.01904296875, -0.068359375, 0.1689453125, 0.22265625, -0.13671875, -0.048095703125, 0.1650390625,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.08056640625, -0.3828125, 0.48828125, 0.06689453125, -0.0751953125, 0.26953125, 0.15234375, 0.08(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1298828125, -0.193359375, 0.1826171875, 0.038330078125, -0.0294189453125, 0.06787109375, 0.0461(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0164794921875, -0.388671875, 0.55859375, 0.0135498046875, -0.037841796875, 0.1650390625, 0.1748(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0478515625, -0.294921875, 0.380859375, -0.119140625, -0.033447265625, -0.14453125, 0.134765625,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0859375, -0.3203125, 0.6875, 0.10400390625, -0.23828125, 0.18359375, -0.07470703125, 0.416015625(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.08837890625, -0.328125, 0.408203125, 0.05078125, -0.1806640625, 0.09765625, 0.205078125, 0.32226(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07958984375, -0.5, 0.44140625, -0.060791015625, -0.04736328125, 0.265625, 0.12255859375, 0.2490(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.051513671875, -0.12890625, 0.33984375, 0.162109375, -0.146484375, 0.126953125, 0.130859375, 0.02(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.05419921875, -0.36328125, 0.41015625, -0.055908203125, -0.00396728515625, 0.130859375, 0.059814(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.01123046875, -0.224609375, 0.451171875, 0.07373046875, -0.2197265625, 0.1640625, 0.018432617187(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2060546875, -0.265625, 0.353515625, 0.0498046875, -0.16796875, 0.1630859375, 0.02880859375, 0.2(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.04833984375, -0.4140625, 0.484375, -0.08984375, -0.193359375, 0.0255126953125, 0.06494140625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED)

"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)

"have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with Supreme Court Case Number FR Application Nos 41/2016, the interpretation given t(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in FR Application No. 41/2016, and how doe(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in FR Application No. 41/2016 is the Co(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** How should the interpretation of Circular P3 be in favor of the children of the Petit(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe interpretation of Circular P3 in this case should be in favor of the children of(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the interpretation of Circular PI-III and Article 3 of the Fundamental Rights Application 5(...TRUNCATED)

"The interpretation of Circular PI-III and Article 3 of the Fundamental Rights Application 59/2010 r(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED)

"The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.03955078125, -0.0654296875, 0.2138671875, -0.0196533203125, -0.2119140625, -0.1611328125, 0.065(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1259765625, -0.2138671875, 0.240234375, 0.08203125, 0.064453125, 0.1923828125, -0.07421875, 0.2(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1513671875, -0.173828125, 0.333984375, 0.09912109375, -0.0223388671875, 0.00848388671875, -0.10(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.08837890625, -0.2236328125, 0.380859375, 0.384765625, 0.1328125, 0.2138671875, 0.1474609375, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.126953125, -0.1728515625, 0.193359375, 0.03515625, -0.1630859375, 0.017578125, 0.1240234375, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0233154296875, -0.0625, 0.33203125, 0.1611328125, -0.21875, 0.09130859375, 0.09228515625, 0.1621(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1328125, -0.12109375, 0.302734375, 0.310546875, 0.036865234375, 0.3125, -0.01495361328125, 0.02(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.018310546875, -0.1103515625, 0.3671875, 0.099609375, -0.03271484375, 0.26171875, 0.029052734375,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1494140625, -0.10205078125, 0.380859375, -0.00982666015625, 0.0478515625, 0.033447265625, -0.11(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1396484375, -0.1640625, 0.330078125, 0.322265625, -0.022705078125, 0.142578125, -0.042236328125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.00726318359375, -0.0107421875, 0.3984375, -0.056884765625, 0.041015625, -0.03369140625, -0.1591(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.181640625, -0.07421875, 0.296875, -0.0238037109375, 0.03955078125, 0.053955078125, -0.247070312(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.205078125, -0.1962890625, 0.2451171875, -0.0224609375, -0.0030059814453125, -0.044189453125, -0(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED)

"Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED)

"From the above passage, questions the preliminary objections involved are:\n1) Did the trial Court (...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal implication of the trial court's ruling on the preliminary objections raised by t(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The legal implication of the trial court's ruling on the preliminary objections raised by t(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe question related to the preliminary objections involved in the case is the time-(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the specific rules mentioned in the snippet that the Respondents argued were not complied(...TRUNCATED)

"The specific rules mentioned in the snippet that the Respondents argued were not complied with by t(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED)

"The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004. The first o(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.034912109375, 0.0869140625, 0.5546875, 0.19140625, -0.1103515625, 0.20703125, 0.1279296875, 0.0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2578125, -0.30078125, 0.4453125, 0.318359375, -0.11865234375, 0.1796875, 0.10302734375, 0.19433(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.265625, -0.1357421875, 0.5390625, 0.2451171875, -0.0908203125, 0.265625, 0.054443359375, 0.1542(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1396484375, -0.1357421875, 0.458984375, 0.076171875, -0.1953125, 0.0198974609375, 0.07666015625,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.03662109375, -0.1220703125, 0.1328125, 0.111328125, -0.2353515625, 0.26171875, 0.12451171875, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.142578125, -0.05810546875, 0.28125, 0.189453125, -0.012451171875, -0.039794921875, 0.0947265625(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.076171875, 0.107421875, 0.1884765625, 0.162109375, 0.08203125, -0.2197265625, -0.0135498046875, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0791015625, -0.1494140625, 0.1865234375, 0.1376953125, -0.310546875, 0.1923828125, -0.114257812(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.25, -0.3046875, 0.3515625, 0.130859375, -0.224609375, 0.1474609375, 0.005279541015625, 0.302734(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.05712890625, -0.0167236328125, 0.1806640625, 0.078125, -0.04736328125, -0.20703125, -0.04638671(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1533203125, -0.0732421875, 0.55078125, 0.224609375, -0.10888671875, 0.24609375, 0.11376953125, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1611328125, -0.1474609375, 0.5234375, 0.255859375, -0.1376953125, 0.2236328125, 0.08642578125, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.265625, -0.271484375, 0.482421875, 0.279296875, -0.1845703125, 0.146484375, 0.05517578125, 0.11(...TRUNCATED)