alignllm-introduction
Collection
Introduction of AlignLLM evaluation method • 15 items • Updated
question string | answer string | snippet string | answerGenerated string | temperature float64 | model string | question_answerGenerated_llama string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama string | question_answerGenerated_gemma string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma string | question_answerGenerated_mistral string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_llama string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral string | question_emb string | snippet_emb string | answer_emb string | answerGenerated_emb string | question_answerGenerated_llama_emb string | question_answerGenerated_gemma_emb string | question_answerGenerated_mistral_emb string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama_emb string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_llama_emb string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb string | gold_standard_cos float64 | question_answerGenerated_llama_cos float64 | question_answerGenerated_gemma_cos float64 | question_answerGenerated_mistral_cos float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_llama_cos float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_cos float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_cos float64 | ILRSim float64 | answer_judge_cos_mean float64 | question_snippet_similarity float64 | iaa_fleiss_kappa float64 | iaa_fleiss_kappa_agreement float64 | iaa_fleiss_kappa_disagreement float64 | question_reconstruction_llama_error float64 | question_reconstruction_gemma_error float64 | question_reconstruction_mistral_error float64 | ILRError float64 | ILRAlign float64 | WILRAlign float64 | question_bm25_score_mean float64 | question_rouge_score_mean float64 | question_bleu_score_mean float64 | question_alignment float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED) | "services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED) | "In accordance with Supreme Court Case Number FR No. 556/2011 petitioner has been exonerated on Octo(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What was the outcome of the Supreme Court case number FR No. 556/2011 regarding petitioner's suspen(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: The outcome of the Supreme Court case number FR No. 556/2011 regarding the petitioner's sus(...TRUNCATED) | **Question:** What constitutional rights were violated by the Petitioner in this case? | "answer:\n\nThe Petitioner's constitutional rights violated in this case were Article 12(1) and 14(1(...TRUNCATED) | "What was the outcome of the petitioner's case regarding his wrongful suspension from the Police Res(...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioner in Supreme Court Case No. FR No. 556/2011 had his services suspended from the Police(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: According to the Petitioner, his suspension and subsequent demobilization were in violation(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: \"The Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was (...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 claimed that his services we(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2041015625, -0.07861328125, 0.2578125, 0.1064453125, -0.1240234375, 0.05078125, 0.06689453125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.251953125, -0.474609375, 0.3046875, 0.16015625, -0.0732421875, 0.2001953125, 0.0218505859375, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.236328125, -0.318359375, 0.2021484375, 0.044189453125, -0.1005859375, 0.171875, -0.030517578125(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.298828125, -0.43359375, 0.427734375, 0.1826171875, -0.25, 0.2177734375, 0.1474609375, 0.2890625(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.30859375, -0.1884765625, 0.333984375, 0.1552734375, -0.1669921875, 0.1162109375, 0.064453125, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0128173828125, -0.169921875, 0.30859375, 0.12158203125, -0.193359375, 0.046630859375, 0.1689453(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.265625, -0.33203125, 0.318359375, 0.1298828125, -0.1943359375, 0.0289306640625, 0.039794921875,(...TRUNCATED) | "[9.059906005859375e-05, -0.1591796875, 0.2890625, -0.10986328125, -0.08251953125, 0.2431640625, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.41796875, -0.31640625, 0.47265625, 0.1962890625, -0.287109375, 0.1728515625, -0.2158203125, 0.4(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.38671875, -0.400390625, 0.5625, 0.306640625, -0.15234375, 0.201171875, 0.07421875, 0.1298828125(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.032470703125, -0.4765625, 0.2470703125, 0.047607421875, -0.1875, 0.2177734375, -0.04150390625, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.27734375, -0.31640625, 0.2333984375, 0.0274658203125, -0.08642578125, 0.26171875, -0.115234375,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.3828125, -0.41796875, 0.392578125, 0.25, -0.1357421875, 0.18359375, 0.044921875, 0.25, 0.170898(...TRUNCATED) | 0.993125 | 0.999171 | 0.99763 | 0.999022 | 0.998354 | 0.998163 | 0.998905 | 0.998608 | 0.998474 | 0.99452 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.020058 | 0.057025 | 0.026051 | 0.034378 | 0.996574 | 0.996574 | 2.340854 | 1.050923 | 0.130598 | 0.998608 |
"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED) | "The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED) | "In SC Case No. 44/2011, questions such as \"(1) the interpretation of section 367 read with Order X(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What is the legal interpretation of section 367 read with Order XVIII Rule 3 of the Uniform Civil C(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: According to the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka in SC Case No. 44/2011, the legal interpretatio(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What questions were taken notice for by the Court in SC Case No. 44/2011 through its (...TRUNCATED) | "The provided text does not mention any questions taken notice for by the Court in SC Case No. 44/20(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the specific issues addressed in SC Case No. 44/2011 regarding the interpretation of sect(...TRUNCATED) | "SC Case No. 44/2011, E.P.A. Premasundara v. Seemasahitha Galoya Medapalatha Vivida Seva Samupakara (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED) | "The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, there is no explicit mention of the questions of law for which leave(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1005859375, 0.0859375, 0.1923828125, 0.029541015625, -0.0791015625, -0.03564453125, 0.188476562(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.216796875, -0.298828125, 0.1650390625, -0.0810546875, -0.3046875, 0.0140380859375, -0.003082275(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1845703125, -0.318359375, 0.2177734375, 0.02978515625, -0.302734375, 0.00946044921875, 0.052001(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2353515625, -0.177734375, 0.373046875, 0.189453125, -0.1845703125, 0.271484375, -0.015747070312(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1982421875, -0.07958984375, 0.150390625, -0.01361083984375, -0.1943359375, 0.1318359375, 0.0825(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.22265625, -0.04833984375, 0.453125, 0.2392578125, -0.0218505859375, 0.0233154296875, 0.09716796(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.15234375, -0.263671875, 0.15625, 0.1767578125, -0.0026397705078125, 0.12109375, -0.09033203125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2275390625, -0.0224609375, 0.53515625, 0.1484375, -0.216796875, -0.03564453125, -0.04248046875,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.55078125, -0.109375, 0.232421875, -0.1220703125, -0.15234375, -0.0118408203125, -0.0908203125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.248046875, -0.333984375, 0.2451171875, -0.057861328125, -0.2021484375, -0.10888671875, -0.09863(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1376953125, 0.03466796875, 0.294921875, 0.08349609375, -0.2265625, -0.1337890625, -0.0849609375(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.279296875, -0.3203125, 0.328125, -0.0654296875, -0.205078125, 0.10693359375, -0.061767578125, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.16796875, -0.09521484375, 0.298828125, 0.10107421875, -0.25390625, -0.00885009765625, -0.044921(...TRUNCATED) | 0.996668 | 0.997241 | 0.998421 | 0.997157 | 0.998756 | 0.997961 | 0.994523 | 0.997606 | 0.99708 | 0.991158 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.069188 | 0.042057 | 0.0737 | 0.061649 | 0.995242 | 0.995244 | 2.333333 | 0.738283 | 0.114567 | 0.997606 |
"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED) | "1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED) | "In <sup>CASE Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the leading judgement of Mr Abeyewardana’s judgement,(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What was the legal issue at the center of Mr. Abeyewardana's judgement in the <sup>CASE Number S.C.(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe legal issue at the center of Mr. Abeyewardana's judgment in the S.C. Appeal No. 8/20(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What legal issue was the leading judgement of Mr Abeyewardana’s judgement in Case N(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The text does not specify the legal issue of Mr Abeyewardana’s judgement in Case Number S(...TRUNCATED) | "What was the key legal issue in Case No. S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 regarding the rights of Sri Lankan (...TRUNCATED) | "The key legal issue in Case No. S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was not explicitly stated in the provided sn(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 w(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court case number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was a dispute between two parties identified a(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.006256103515625, -0.00848388671875, 0.337890625, 0.08740234375, -0.02392578125, -0.0242919921875(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.15234375, -0.2109375, 0.24609375, -0.050048828125, -0.24609375, 0.0106201171875, 0.11376953125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2421875, -0.019775390625, 0.224609375, 0.134765625, -0.10400390625, 0.12353515625, -0.058837890(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.07763671875, -0.2138671875, 0.498046875, -0.0255126953125, -0.1328125, -0.048828125, 0.1328125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.154296875, -0.1669921875, 0.248046875, -0.08056640625, -0.1240234375, -0.07177734375, 0.2519531(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0291748046875, -0.1025390625, 0.380859375, -0.09716796875, -0.1279296875, -0.01544189453125, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.049560546875, 0.030029296875, 0.38671875, 0.0732421875, 0.0108642578125, -0.031982421875, 0.110(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0908203125, -0.04638671875, 0.26953125, -0.00433349609375, -0.1787109375, -0.0703125, 0.0751953(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1015625, -0.302734375, 0.1767578125, -0.2275390625, -0.359375, 0.034423828125, -0.123046875, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0390625, -0.1904296875, 0.484375, 0.0966796875, -0.25390625, -0.08349609375, -0.04296875, 0.445(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0177001953125, 0.01165771484375, 0.37890625, 0.0947265625, -0.1962890625, -0.087890625, -0.08349(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.333984375, -0.15234375, 0.26953125, 0.33203125, -0.046630859375, 0.16015625, -0.048095703125, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1533203125, -0.16015625, 0.4375, 0.111328125, -0.2451171875, -0.01708984375, -0.0908203125, 0.5(...TRUNCATED) | 0.996986 | 0.998525 | 0.997002 | 0.998757 | 0.993443 | 0.997042 | 0.997222 | 0.998095 | 0.995902 | 0.994272 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.04451 | 0.072032 | 0.03517 | 0.050571 | 0.994554 | 0.994553 | 2.333333 | 1.271318 | 0.469556 | 0.998095 |
"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED) | "In 2005 a judgement came from the Supreme Court of Appeal granting 20% damages to Trico Maritime wi(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "were the key factors considered by the court in the Ceylinco Insurance case when determining the pa(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The court in the Ceylinco Insurance case considered several key factors when determining th(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:**\n\nDoes the mentioned arbitration awards in 1999 and 2005 appear to be in accordance (...TRUNCATED) | "**Answer:**\n\nThe text does not provide information about customary (national or foreign?) precede(...TRUNCATED) | "n the provided snippet, what were the customary precedents regarding arbitration awards, as referre(...TRUNCATED) | "In the Trico Maritime vs. Ceylinco Insurance case, the customary precedents regarding arbitration a(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The main issue in the case before the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1806640625, -0.01031494140625, 0.2353515625, -0.087890625, -0.030029296875, -0.138671875, -0.00(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2177734375, -0.33984375, 0.10302734375, 0.01806640625, -0.2470703125, 0.0732421875, -0.00573730(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.228515625, -0.19140625, 0.2431640625, -0.016845703125, -0.2021484375, 0.0556640625, -0.00201416(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.004241943359375, -0.1806640625, 0.2578125, -0.033447265625, -0.09521484375, 0.053466796875, 0.2(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0859375, -0.1357421875, -0.18359375, 0.10595703125, -0.1494140625, -0.0159912109375, -0.10351562(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1259765625, -0.1630859375, 0.2236328125, 0.00994873046875, -0.10693359375, 0.08349609375, 0.0336(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.14453125, -0.11328125, 0.205078125, -0.099609375, -0.052734375, 0.06787109375, 0.003204345703125(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.038330078125, 0.111328125, 0.2412109375, 0.06787109375, -0.08544921875, 0.01611328125, -0.093261(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.02294921875, -0.1025390625, 0.0267333984375, -0.0830078125, -0.2138671875, -0.045166015625, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.02099609375, -0.123046875, 0.185546875, -0.236328125, -0.259765625, 0.1787109375, -0.0123901367(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1240234375, -0.03759765625, 0.314453125, -0.06982421875, -0.0654296875, -0.004913330078125, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1337890625, -0.052001953125, 0.228515625, -0.099609375, -0.2314453125, 0.1328125, -0.1240234375,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.107421875, -0.1552734375, 0.236328125, -0.0439453125, -0.2021484375, 0.0128173828125, -0.047851(...TRUNCATED) | 0.994431 | 0.995917 | 0.996492 | 0.997229 | 0.998456 | 0.998433 | 0.999354 | 0.996546 | 0.998748 | 0.985607 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.098291 | 0.093192 | 0.066958 | 0.086147 | 0.992786 | 0.992787 | 2.393332 | 0.357926 | 0.049668 | 0.996546 |
"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED) | "The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED) | "1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED) | "In `SUPREme COnSTItUTION Appeal 1/1983;` Case No SC Appeal 11/85, a case decided in `1995` was held(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What is the legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in S Nicawewa, SC Appeal Case 1/2005 regar(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in S Nicawewa, SC Appeal Case 1/2005 re(...TRUNCATED) | **Question:** What constitutional rights are affected by the case in the snippet? | "Answer: The text does not mention any constitutional rights, therefore I cannot answer this questio(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the court's findings in the case of S.C. Appeal No. 1/2005 (Nicawewa) regarding the writ (...TRUNCATED) | "I apologize for the confusion, but the provided snippet does not contain any information regarding (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED) | "The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.00848388671875, -0.10595703125, 0.34375, 0.1611328125, -0.00897216796875, 0.040283203125, 0.180(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0654296875, -0.27734375, 0.19140625, -0.1435546875, -0.322265625, 0.1142578125, 0.1416015625, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.126953125, -0.2890625, 0.361328125, -0.07177734375, -0.283203125, 0.035400390625, 0.10107421875(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.130859375, -0.2890625, 0.2490234375, 0.06982421875, -0.12890625, 0.185546875, 0.134765625, 0.43(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.034912109375, -0.275390625, 0.302734375, 0.051025390625, -0.1591796875, 0.10888671875, 0.184570(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.040771484375, -0.2275390625, 0.337890625, 0.2373046875, -0.03857421875, 0.01031494140625, 0.1098(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1513671875, -0.2119140625, 0.396484375, 0.138671875, -0.26171875, 0.22265625, 0.201171875, 0.23(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.10107421875, 0.021240234375, 0.055908203125, 0.04345703125, -0.25390625, -0.06591796875, -0.1953(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.294921875, -0.10107421875, 0.45703125, -0.17578125, -0.09423828125, 0.1142578125, 0.02673339843(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.306640625, -0.146484375, 0.61328125, 0.2490234375, -0.26953125, 0.1650390625, -0.01007080078125(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.08837890625, -0.359375, 0.345703125, -0.08447265625, -0.234375, -0.030517578125, 0.134765625, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.142578125, -0.3828125, 0.384765625, -0.04443359375, -0.263671875, 0.005584716796875, 0.12890625(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.126953125, -0.2890625, 0.361328125, -0.07177734375, -0.283203125, 0.035400390625, 0.10107421875(...TRUNCATED) | 0.992393 | 0.996985 | 0.99542 | 0.997711 | 0.999581 | 0.999542 | 1 | 0.996705 | 0.999708 | 0.994292 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.072765 | 0.109502 | 0.054365 | 0.078877 | 0.992987 | 0.992988 | 2.349934 | 0.52589 | 0.114141 | 0.996705 |
"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED) | "SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED) | "In accordance with the marked criteria for the post, the respondents claimed that the petitioner ha(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What is the basis for the respondents' claim that the petitioner has additional marks for direct re(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: The basis for the respondents' claim that the petitioner has additional marks for direct re(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What is the relevant criteria for awarding marks for the post of Director of the Seed(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe relevant criteria for awarding marks for the post of Director of the Seed and Planti(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the marking scheme annexed to the petition, what experience of the petitioner, aside from (...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the petitioner's experience as a Research Officer in charge of the A(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: According to the snippet, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petit(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED) | "The Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 countered the Petitioner's claim by relyin(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.052001953125, 0.045166015625, 0.3125, 0.059814453125, -0.2294921875, 0.08740234375, -0.12988281(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.07275390625, -0.33203125, 0.15625, 0.1728515625, 0.1494140625, 0.034423828125, 0.208984375, 0.3(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.162109375, -0.28125, 0.28125, -0.09521484375, 0.162109375, 0.015625, 0.1279296875, 0.314453125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.07275390625, -0.384765625, 0.275390625, 0.16015625, 0.138671875, 0.0028839111328125, 0.083007812(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0732421875, -0.1630859375, 0.337890625, 0.008056640625, 0.019775390625, 0.08837890625, 0.0634765(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.083984375, -0.1767578125, 0.416015625, 0.1064453125, 0.056640625, -0.0380859375, 0.2578125, 0.2(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0162353515625, -0.29296875, 0.302734375, 0.10791015625, 0.08935546875, -0.1416015625, 0.14746093(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1005859375, -0.25, 0.3671875, -0.034423828125, 0.23046875, 0.047119140625, 0.294921875, 0.46289(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.07763671875, -0.40234375, 0.2080078125, -0.0810546875, 0.2373046875, -0.11572265625, 0.14453125(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1767578125, -0.251953125, 0.2578125, -0.091796875, 0.2890625, -0.2138671875, 0.0615234375, 0.35(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1904296875, -0.248046875, 0.2138671875, -0.052734375, 0.11083984375, -0.007598876953125, 0.1425(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1376953125, -0.205078125, 0.310546875, -0.00433349609375, 0.06884765625, -0.0130615234375, 0.04(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.21484375, -0.345703125, 0.2177734375, 0.014404296875, 0.072265625, -0.058837890625, 0.009277343(...TRUNCATED) | 0.99748 | 0.996766 | 0.997032 | 0.996131 | 0.999118 | 0.999715 | 0.997974 | 0.996643 | 0.998936 | 0.99621 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.079297 | 0.073165 | 0.094413 | 0.082292 | 0.993915 | 0.993916 | 2.333333 | 0.466232 | 0.024363 | 0.996643 |
"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED) | "Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED) | "In accordance with the verdict mentioned in the given snippet, the defendant-appellant raised objec(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What was the basis of the defendant-appellant's objection to the plaintiffs' land rights according (...TRUNCATED) | "answer: According to the snippet, the basis of the defendant-appellant's objection to the plaintiff(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What was the primary purpose of the respondents' action in the District Court of Nego(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe respondents' primary purpose of action in the District Court of Negombo case was to (...TRUNCATED) | "What were the arguments made by both the appellant and respondents regarding their title to the lan(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondents, as the plaintiffs in the District Court of Negombo case, argued that they had inst(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: According to the snippet, the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument in the District Cour(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land in question, known as Muthurajawela(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1162109375, -0.06787109375, 0.263671875, 0.043701171875, -0.10791015625, 0.2216796875, 0.0708007(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.171875, -0.3671875, 0.1572265625, 0.0233154296875, -0.1865234375, 0.140625, 0.06982421875, 0.54(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.027587890625, -0.1376953125, 0.126953125, -0.049072265625, -0.076171875, -0.0311279296875, 0.15(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.052490234375, -0.11572265625, 0.59765625, 0.0172119140625, -0.1650390625, 0.11865234375, 0.1923(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.034423828125, 0.0167236328125, 0.0712890625, -0.02734375, -0.0703125, 0.109375, -0.0234375, 0.29(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.076171875, 0.2470703125, 0.4453125, 0.1806640625, 0.042236328125, -0.109375, 0.03564453125, 0.0(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1337890625, -0.240234375, 0.1689453125, 0.2265625, -0.1748046875, 0.291015625, 0.1259765625, 0.2(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0169677734375, -0.15625, 0.36328125, -0.0247802734375, -0.064453125, 0.05908203125, -0.13085937(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.09814453125, -0.142578125, 0.12890625, 0.06298828125, -0.08642578125, -0.037109375, 0.170898437(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1162109375, -0.27734375, 0.220703125, -0.033447265625, -0.16015625, 0.10009765625, 0.0612792968(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0419921875, -0.1943359375, 0.2490234375, -0.004852294921875, 0.06494140625, 0.0277099609375, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.06494140625, -0.150390625, 0.26953125, 0.0263671875, 0.05615234375, -0.015625, 0.046630859375, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1396484375, -0.25, 0.11572265625, -0.038330078125, -0.1904296875, 0.034912109375, 0.12060546875(...TRUNCATED) | 0.997451 | 0.998995 | 0.997195 | 0.99757 | 0.999551 | 0.999601 | 0.998517 | 0.99792 | 0.999223 | 0.992032 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.030535 | 0.066625 | 0.064393 | 0.053851 | 0.99734 | 0.99734 | 2.424558 | 1.102757 | 0.409769 | 0.99792 |
"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED) | "She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED) | "In accordance with Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20 and the above interpretation by th(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "Based on the given snippet and answer, what question would you generate?\n\nA) Can you explain the (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: B) In light of the Supreme Court decision in Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20, how should th(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** Whether the Accused-Appellant had the knowledge that her act would definitely lead to(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Accused-Appellant had no knowledge that her act would definitely lead to the death o(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the interpretation of the Court of Appeal in Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the interpretation of the Court of Appeal in Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. APe. No. 20(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court did not directly answer the question regarding the Court of Appeal's interpretati(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.01904296875, -0.068359375, 0.1689453125, 0.22265625, -0.13671875, -0.048095703125, 0.1650390625,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.08056640625, -0.3828125, 0.48828125, 0.06689453125, -0.0751953125, 0.26953125, 0.15234375, 0.08(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1298828125, -0.193359375, 0.1826171875, 0.038330078125, -0.0294189453125, 0.06787109375, 0.0461(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0164794921875, -0.388671875, 0.55859375, 0.0135498046875, -0.037841796875, 0.1650390625, 0.1748(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0478515625, -0.294921875, 0.380859375, -0.119140625, -0.033447265625, -0.14453125, 0.134765625,(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0859375, -0.3203125, 0.6875, 0.10400390625, -0.23828125, 0.18359375, -0.07470703125, 0.416015625(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.08837890625, -0.328125, 0.408203125, 0.05078125, -0.1806640625, 0.09765625, 0.205078125, 0.32226(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.07958984375, -0.5, 0.44140625, -0.060791015625, -0.04736328125, 0.265625, 0.12255859375, 0.2490(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.051513671875, -0.12890625, 0.33984375, 0.162109375, -0.146484375, 0.126953125, 0.130859375, 0.02(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.05419921875, -0.36328125, 0.41015625, -0.055908203125, -0.00396728515625, 0.130859375, 0.059814(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.01123046875, -0.224609375, 0.451171875, 0.07373046875, -0.2197265625, 0.1640625, 0.018432617187(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2060546875, -0.265625, 0.353515625, 0.0498046875, -0.16796875, 0.1630859375, 0.02880859375, 0.2(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.04833984375, -0.4140625, 0.484375, -0.08984375, -0.193359375, 0.0255126953125, 0.06494140625, 0(...TRUNCATED) | 0.99219 | 0.989757 | 0.990328 | 0.997901 | 0.999464 | 0.997196 | 0.998015 | 0.992662 | 0.998225 | 0.995425 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.333333 | 0.269621 | 0.223374 | 0.054408 | 0.182468 | 0.993365 | 0.993368 | 2.333333 | 0.457646 | 0.150914 | 0.992662 |
"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED) | "have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED) | "In accordance with Supreme Court Case Number FR Application Nos 41/2016, the interpretation given t(...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What is the legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in FR Application No. 41/2016, and how doe(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe legal basis for the Supreme Court's decision in FR Application No. 41/2016 is the Co(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** How should the interpretation of Circular P3 be in favor of the children of the Petit(...TRUNCATED) | "**Answer:**\n\nThe interpretation of Circular P3 in this case should be in favor of the children of(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the interpretation of Circular PI-III and Article 3 of the Fundamental Rights Application 5(...TRUNCATED) | "The interpretation of Circular PI-III and Article 3 of the Fundamental Rights Application 59/2010 r(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.03955078125, -0.0654296875, 0.2138671875, -0.0196533203125, -0.2119140625, -0.1611328125, 0.065(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1259765625, -0.2138671875, 0.240234375, 0.08203125, 0.064453125, 0.1923828125, -0.07421875, 0.2(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1513671875, -0.173828125, 0.333984375, 0.09912109375, -0.0223388671875, 0.00848388671875, -0.10(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.08837890625, -0.2236328125, 0.380859375, 0.384765625, 0.1328125, 0.2138671875, 0.1474609375, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.126953125, -0.1728515625, 0.193359375, 0.03515625, -0.1630859375, 0.017578125, 0.1240234375, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.0233154296875, -0.0625, 0.33203125, 0.1611328125, -0.21875, 0.09130859375, 0.09228515625, 0.1621(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1328125, -0.12109375, 0.302734375, 0.310546875, 0.036865234375, 0.3125, -0.01495361328125, 0.02(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.018310546875, -0.1103515625, 0.3671875, 0.099609375, -0.03271484375, 0.26171875, 0.029052734375,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1494140625, -0.10205078125, 0.380859375, -0.00982666015625, 0.0478515625, 0.033447265625, -0.11(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1396484375, -0.1640625, 0.330078125, 0.322265625, -0.022705078125, 0.142578125, -0.042236328125(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.00726318359375, -0.0107421875, 0.3984375, -0.056884765625, 0.041015625, -0.03369140625, -0.1591(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.181640625, -0.07421875, 0.296875, -0.0238037109375, 0.03955078125, 0.053955078125, -0.247070312(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.205078125, -0.1962890625, 0.2451171875, -0.0224609375, -0.0030059814453125, -0.044189453125, -0(...TRUNCATED) | 0.992487 | 0.997965 | 0.990638 | 0.996864 | 0.999051 | 0.999003 | 0.999084 | 0.995156 | 0.999046 | 0.99677 | 0.333333 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.050432 | 0.22493 | 0.0755 | 0.116954 | 0.994774 | 0.994775 | 2.409409 | 0.576543 | 0.053689 | 0.995156 |
"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED) | "Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED) | "From the above passage, questions the preliminary objections involved are:\n1) Did the trial Court (...TRUNCATED) | 2 | falcon | "What is the legal implication of the trial court's ruling on the preliminary objections raised by t(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The legal implication of the trial court's ruling on the preliminary objections raised by t(...TRUNCATED) | **Question:** What is the question related to the preliminary objections involved in the case? | "**Answer:**\n\nThe question related to the preliminary objections involved in the case is the time-(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the specific rules mentioned in the snippet that the Respondents argued were not complied(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific rules mentioned in the snippet that the Respondents argued were not complied with by t(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004. The first o(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.034912109375, 0.0869140625, 0.5546875, 0.19140625, -0.1103515625, 0.20703125, 0.1279296875, 0.0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.2578125, -0.30078125, 0.4453125, 0.318359375, -0.11865234375, 0.1796875, 0.10302734375, 0.19433(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.265625, -0.1357421875, 0.5390625, 0.2451171875, -0.0908203125, 0.265625, 0.054443359375, 0.1542(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.1396484375, -0.1357421875, 0.458984375, 0.076171875, -0.1953125, 0.0198974609375, 0.07666015625,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.03662109375, -0.1220703125, 0.1328125, 0.111328125, -0.2353515625, 0.26171875, 0.12451171875, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.142578125, -0.05810546875, 0.28125, 0.189453125, -0.012451171875, -0.039794921875, 0.0947265625(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.076171875, 0.107421875, 0.1884765625, 0.162109375, 0.08203125, -0.2197265625, -0.0135498046875, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.0791015625, -0.1494140625, 0.1865234375, 0.1376953125, -0.310546875, 0.1923828125, -0.114257812(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.25, -0.3046875, 0.3515625, 0.130859375, -0.224609375, 0.1474609375, 0.005279541015625, 0.302734(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.05712890625, -0.0167236328125, 0.1806640625, 0.078125, -0.04736328125, -0.20703125, -0.04638671(...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1533203125, -0.0732421875, 0.55078125, 0.224609375, -0.10888671875, 0.24609375, 0.11376953125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.1611328125, -0.1474609375, 0.5234375, 0.255859375, -0.1376953125, 0.2236328125, 0.08642578125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-0.265625, -0.271484375, 0.482421875, 0.279296875, -0.1845703125, 0.146484375, 0.05517578125, 0.11(...TRUNCATED) | 0.997306 | 0.996406 | 0.99411 | 0.996676 | 0.99947 | 0.999023 | 0.998754 | 0.995731 | 0.999082 | 0.99443 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.333333 | 0.085755 | 0.144114 | 0.083624 | 0.104497 | 0.995965 | 0.995966 | 2.381205 | 0.901644 | 0.21821 | 0.995731 |