Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
string
answer
string
snippet
string
answerGenerated
string
temperature
float64
model
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string
question_emb
string
snippet_emb
string
answer_emb
string
answerGenerated_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
gold_standard_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_falcon_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_gemma_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_mistral_cos
float64
judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_cos
float64
judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_cos
float64
judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_cos
float64
ILRSim
float64
answer_judge_cos_mean
float64
question_snippet_similarity
float64
iaa_fleiss_kappa
float64
iaa_fleiss_kappa_agreement
float64
iaa_fleiss_kappa_disagreement
float64
question_reconstruction_falcon_error
float64
question_reconstruction_gemma_error
float64
question_reconstruction_mistral_error
float64
ILRError
float64
ILRAlign
float64
WILRAlign
float64
question_bm25_score_mean
float64
question_rouge_score_mean
float64
question_bleu_score_mean
float64
question_alignment
float64
"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED)
"In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED)
"services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Suprem(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What were the grounds for the Petitioner's suspension and subsequent demobilization in the case of (...TRUNCATED)
"The grounds for the Petitioner's suspension and subsequent demobilization in the case of SC/FR/Appl(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the basis of the Petitioner's claim in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Applicat(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe Petitioner's claim in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 was based(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the Petitioner's argument in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 regardin(...TRUNCATED)
"The Petitioner argued before the Supreme Court in case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 that his suspe(...TRUNCATED)
"The petitioner claimed that he was falsely implicated in a shooting incident and was suspended. Aft(...TRUNCATED)
"answer: \"The Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was (...TRUNCATED)
"The Petitioner in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 claimed that his services we(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4853515625, -1.40625, 0.7509765625, -0.475341796875, -0.77978515625, -0.00719451904296875, 1.014(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.478515625, -1.95703125, 0.56640625, -0.158447265625, -1.2138671875, 0.5, 1.068359375, -1.2177734(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4560546875, -1.7861328125, 0.296630859375, 0.15966796875, -0.728515625, 0.438720703125, 1.144531(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.37109375, -2.107421875, 1.02734375, -0.0428466796875, -1.10546875, 0.59716796875, 1.052734375, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4189453125, -1.9677734375, 0.7060546875, -0.29296875, -1.091796875, -0.322509765625, 0.976074218(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3349609375, -0.931640625, 0.032257080078125, -0.5380859375, -0.491455078125, -0.40478515625, 1.0(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.171875, -1.87109375, 0.70166015625, -0.529296875, -1.01953125, 0.07373046875, 1.0625, -0.5351562(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6748046875, -1.748046875, 0.86669921875, -0.159423828125, -0.9033203125, 0.7158203125, 0.8374023(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.240234375, -2.09765625, 0.9169921875, -0.00661468505859375, -1.0634765625, 0.904296875, 0.411621(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6787109375, -1.8203125, 0.62451171875, 0.2403564453125, -1.0869140625, 0.446533203125, 1.2060546(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.69873046875, -1.8779296875, 0.7138671875, -0.329345703125, -0.533203125, 1.12109375, 0.711914062(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.94140625, -1.8876953125, 1.1240234375, 0.3515625, -0.8408203125, 0.2249755859375, 0.8564453125, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6083984375, -1.7705078125, 0.69921875, 0.05230712890625, -1.0439453125, 0.375732421875, 1.223632(...TRUNCATED)
0.903034
0.930429
0.896341
0.896464
0.854962
0.81637
0.954219
0.907744
0.875184
0.632492
1
1
0
0.075266
0.110516
0.123489
0.10309
0.919051
0.918984
2.474067
1.700326
1.002463
0.907744
"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED)
"The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED)
"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011?
"In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What are the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. (...TRUNCATED)
"The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC(...TRUNCATED)
"What are the specific legal issues that the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of S(...TRUNCATED)
"The Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 consid(...TRUNCATED)
"In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED)
"The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the provided snippet, there is no explicit mention of the questions of law for which leave(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3984375, -0.904296875, 0.25244140625, -0.53857421875, -1.0205078125, -0.387939453125, 1.47949218(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.9443359375, -1.185546875, -0.244873046875, 0.09429931640625, -0.326904296875, 0.396484375, 0.588(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7177734375, -1.7958984375, 0.4951171875, 0.50048828125, -0.9423828125, 1.064453125, 1.2724609375(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2587890625, -1.6201171875, 0.8544921875, -0.00012743473052978516, -0.62939453125, 0.822265625, 0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4755859375, -0.91748046875, 0.36474609375, -0.6279296875, -0.99169921875, -0.441162109375, 1.377(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4365234375, -0.796875, 0.3232421875, -0.66259765625, -0.8369140625, -0.2191162109375, 1.11035156(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.65966796875, -1.3857421875, 0.27001953125, -0.2227783203125, -0.07464599609375, 0.3525390625, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.548828125, -0.79443359375, 0.7666015625, 0.2042236328125, -0.87109375, 0.1522216796875, 1.100585(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5400390625, -1.9951171875, 0.75341796875, -0.12115478515625, -1.1767578125, 1.1904296875, 1.0205(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0625, -1.7138671875, 0.442626953125, 0.179931640625, -0.6591796875, 0.9248046875, 0.6025390625, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5185546875, -0.7763671875, 0.818359375, 0.1871337890625, -0.96875, 0.28662109375, 1.109375, -0.4(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4521484375, -1.4482421875, 0.89794921875, 0.269775390625, -1.046875, 0.9814453125, 1.25, 0.00082(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5458984375, -1.0283203125, 0.350830078125, 0.183837890625, -0.94677734375, 0.78271484375, 1.1064(...TRUNCATED)
0.821415
0.986619
0.926849
0.672077
0.86339
0.7664
0.799559
0.861849
0.809783
0.596836
0.333333
0
1
0.018073
0.091465
0.378073
0.162537
0.799063
0.809134
2.335631
1.903998
1.467401
0.861849
"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED)
"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED)
"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 a(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the impugned provision of the Buil(...TRUNCATED)
"In 2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka ruled that the impugned provision of the Building Tax Act, (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What key legal issues are addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal N(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the main legal issues that the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka considered in Case No. 8/2016, (...TRUNCATED)
"The main legal issues considered in Case No. 8/2016 by the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka were as follo(...TRUNCATED)
"In Case Number S.C Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka addressed several legal issues(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED)
"The Supreme Court case number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was a dispute between two parties identified a(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.634765625, -0.96875, -0.021759033203125, -0.95263671875, -0.7890625, -0.1915283203125, 1.4394531(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.94775390625, -1.2998046875, -0.470703125, -0.11309814453125, -0.181884765625, 0.283935546875, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.529296875, -1.7685546875, 0.9609375, 0.076416015625, -1.0908203125, 1.0546875, 1.1552734375, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1572265625, -1.458984375, 0.7119140625, 0.5576171875, -0.83837890625, 0.767578125, 0.5595703125,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4755859375, -1.0986328125, 0.279541015625, -0.18798828125, -0.775390625, -0.125, 1.19140625, 0.4(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.27734375, -0.849609375, -0.350341796875, -0.97216796875, -0.46435546875, 0.0165252685546875, 0.9(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2978515625, -1.8671875, 0.356689453125, -0.01177978515625, -0.315673828125, 0.451171875, 1.16894(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7861328125, -0.517578125, 0.324951171875, 0.0701904296875, -0.61083984375, 0.31640625, 1.2324218(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.109375, -1.783203125, 0.349609375, 0.308349609375, -0.58642578125, 1.3037109375, 0.96533203125, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2529296875, -1.4873046875, 0.8212890625, 0.271484375, -0.7744140625, 0.81689453125, 0.7236328125(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7861328125, -0.517578125, 0.324951171875, 0.0701904296875, -0.61083984375, 0.31640625, 1.2324218(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.8583984375, -1.9345703125, 0.1251220703125, 0.0738525390625, -0.66845703125, 1.2939453125, 1.007(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2783203125, -1.212890625, 0.8525390625, -0.08734130859375, -0.685546875, 0.68603515625, 0.727050(...TRUNCATED)
0.821441
0.821941
0.919536
0.712954
0.810953
0.768324
0.803117
0.818144
0.794131
0.58901
0
0.333333
0.666667
0.213185
0.09645
0.394062
0.234566
0.800906
0.801652
2.333333
1.518721
0.881552
0.818144
"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED)
"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)
"The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED)
"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the rationale behind the Supreme Court's decision in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 20(...TRUNCATED)
"The rationale behind the Supreme Court's decision in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04(...TRUNCATED)
"**Answer:**\n\nThe main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before (...TRUNCATED)
"What was the key dispute in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 at the Supre(...TRUNCATED)
"The key dispute in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 at the Supreme Court (...TRUNCATED)
"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the provided snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB(...TRUNCATED)
"The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.54296875, -0.4755859375, 0.17919921875, -0.50537109375, -0.59228515625, -0.20849609375, 0.743164(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.17578125, -2.337890625, 0.145751953125, 0.3896484375, -1.0, 0.71533203125, 0.66650390625, -1.024(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.666015625, -1.2841796875, 0.1109619140625, 0.300537109375, -0.82861328125, 0.458740234375, 1.043(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.333984375, -1.814453125, 0.263916015625, 0.440673828125, -0.7607421875, 0.78076171875, 0.7568359(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.548828125, -0.73486328125, -0.29931640625, -0.5791015625, -0.64794921875, -0.436279296875, 1.264(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4970703125, -0.55126953125, 0.11920166015625, -0.66796875, -0.55419921875, -0.322509765625, 0.49(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7353515625, -1.0205078125, -0.0291748046875, -0.184814453125, -0.375732421875, 0.09942626953125,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.607421875, -0.859375, 0.07745361328125, -0.238037109375, -0.77880859375, -0.016845703125, 0.3942(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.361328125, -1.1533203125, 0.263427734375, -0.363037109375, -0.91748046875, 0.259521484375, 0.624(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.236328125, -1.8359375, 0.4130859375, 0.2242431640625, -0.9814453125, 0.6591796875, 0.509765625, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.802734375, -1.1767578125, 0.38232421875, 0.1573486328125, -0.94140625, 0.2496337890625, 0.585449(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.83984375, -0.833984375, 0.41552734375, -0.11865234375, -0.80029296875, 0.1866455078125, 0.566894(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.04296875, -1.42578125, 0.09576416015625, 0.3154296875, -0.72021484375, 0.457763671875, 0.3776855(...TRUNCATED)
0.91725
0.925803
0.971147
0.938452
0.889032
0.887369
0.955364
0.945134
0.910588
0.538402
1
1
0
0.092921
0.036464
0.076118
0.068501
0.901302
0.901104
2.417883
1.830538
1.420468
0.945134
"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED)
"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)
"1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the verdict of the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. A(...TRUNCATED)
"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka have not yet ma(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What is the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 is Dr. Sh(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the composition of the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. (...TRUNCATED)
"The judicial panel for Supreme Court Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 consists of three judges: D(...TRUNCATED)
"In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Sr(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED)
"The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.185546875, -1.1240234375, 0.61328125, -0.453369140625, -0.599609375, -0.426025390625, 1.26757812(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.560546875, -1.2763671875, -0.044281005859375, 0.0426025390625, -0.1396484375, -0.14306640625, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2470703125, -1.2080078125, 0.48095703125, 0.04376220703125, -0.10406494140625, -0.126220703125, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1650390625, -1.1650390625, 0.497802734375, 0.0048980712890625, -0.08795166015625, -0.05709838867(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.865234375, -1.591796875, 1.1484375, -0.46630859375, -0.76220703125, -0.53759765625, 0.7875976562(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.431640625, -1.107421875, 0.449951171875, -0.60302734375, -0.53466796875, -0.3310546875, 0.606445(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.498046875, -1.1328125, 0.69921875, -0.25927734375, -0.88818359375, -0.20849609375, 1.03125, -0.0(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.7470703125, -0.98291015625, 0.38916015625, 0.254638671875, -0.161865234375, -0.255615234375, 0.6(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2685546875, -1.185546875, 0.258544921875, -0.6865234375, -1.2744140625, 0.783203125, 1.102539062(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.974609375, -1.01953125, 0.5234375, 0.29296875, -0.373046875, 0.035003662109375, 0.87939453125, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0390625, -0.98779296875, 0.3134765625, 0.0419921875, -0.06414794921875, -0.14453125, 0.710449218(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.68994140625, -1.5576171875, 0.67529296875, 0.2474365234375, -0.1435546875, 0.26513671875, 0.7846(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2470703125, -1.2080078125, 0.48095703125, 0.04376220703125, -0.10406494140625, -0.126220703125, (...TRUNCATED)
0.974798
0.889279
0.865002
0.886231
0.874605
0.961555
1
0.88017
0.945387
0.548209
1
0
1
0.128518
0.151235
0.136809
0.138854
0.887954
0.887647
2.335287
1.914286
1.671777
0.88017
"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED)
"SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The criteria that the respondents relied on to counter the petitioner's claim in the case S(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the relevant criteria for evaluating the experience of a person in the position of Director(...TRUNCATED)
"The relevant criteria for evaluating the experience of a person in the position of Director of SPMD(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What are the criteria that the respondents relied on to counter the petitioner's clai(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petitioner’s own petition,(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the specific criteria in the marking scheme used by the respondents to challenge the peti(...TRUNCATED)
"The specific criteria used by the respondents to challenge the petitioner's claim for additional ma(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the criteria of direct relevant(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED)
"The Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 countered the Petitioner's claim by relyin(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.841796875, -1.73046875, 0.01983642578125, -0.439453125, -1.2587890625, -0.58154296875, 1.0351562(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8408203125, -1.7236328125, 0.2037353515625, 0.8271484375, -1.337890625, 0.740234375, 0.267089843(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.978515625, -1.4892578125, 0.427734375, 0.1871337890625, -1.5849609375, 1.47265625, 0.25708007812(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.115234375, -1.2392578125, 0.76025390625, 0.2763671875, -1.41796875, 1.0625, 0.353271484375, -0.6(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1435546875, -0.81689453125, 0.85791015625, 0.052947998046875, -1.181640625, 0.07818603515625, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.943359375, -1.515625, 0.61328125, -0.669921875, -0.9501953125, -0.60400390625, 0.98828125, 0.134(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.23046875, -1.39453125, 1.1689453125, 0.0633544921875, -1.2490234375, -0.321044921875, 0.54248046(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.150390625, -1.12109375, 0.76953125, 0.21142578125, -1.2607421875, 1.326171875, 0.285400390625, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.482421875, -1.0126953125, 0.576171875, 0.6484375, -1.44921875, 1.404296875, 0.1563720703125, -1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.998046875, -1.396484375, 0.966796875, 0.72607421875, -1.794921875, 1.0771484375, 0.19140625, -1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.259765625, -1.146484375, 0.46240234375, 0.06915283203125, -1.6025390625, 1.3984375, 0.3422851562(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.1171875, -1.69140625, 0.118408203125, 0.1781005859375, -1.458984375, 1.32421875, 0.77392578125, (...TRUNCATED)
"[2.166015625, -1.2470703125, 0.5322265625, 0.0877685546875, -1.5634765625, 0.98095703125, 0.4245605(...TRUNCATED)
0.928559
0.514192
0.91726
0.699376
0.928658
0.958844
0.914961
0.710276
0.934154
0.609456
0
0.333333
0.666667
0.725557
0.089381
0.355754
0.390231
0.803958
0.824634
2.333333
1.257937
0.483795
0.710276
"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED)
"The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED)
"Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distric(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the appellant's evidence to support his claim for title to the land in the District Court o(...TRUNCATED)
"In the provided snippet, the appellant's evidence to support his claim for title includes the claim(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the main argument of the defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negomb(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case argued that he had prescri(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the arguments made by the defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case regar(...TRUNCATED)
"The defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case argued for his right to the land base(...TRUNCATED)
"The defendant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED)
"The appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land in question, known as Muthurajawela(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.51953125, -0.89208984375, 0.211669921875, 0.08563232421875, -0.0278778076171875, -0.126342773437(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.150390625, -2.2421875, 0.58935546875, 0.52490234375, -1.2333984375, 0.609375, 0.91943359375, -1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6015625, -1.9794921875, 0.837890625, 0.6142578125, -1.2041015625, 0.2103271484375, 0.7998046875,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.619140625, -2.029296875, 0.93701171875, 0.6142578125, -0.82763671875, 0.360107421875, 0.65234375(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.142578125, -1.4560546875, 0.83740234375, 0.548828125, -0.763671875, -0.38232421875, 0.517578125,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7529296875, -0.97705078125, 0.8251953125, -0.08935546875, -0.2109375, -0.27001953125, 0.56884765(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.181640625, -1.787109375, 0.98046875, 0.08563232421875, -0.39208984375, -0.33935546875, 1.1533203(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.28515625, -2.017578125, 0.86572265625, 0.7822265625, -0.96435546875, 0.379150390625, 0.648925781(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.654296875, -1.9189453125, 0.80029296875, 0.396240234375, -0.771484375, 0.254638671875, 0.625, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.71484375, -2.00390625, 0.884765625, 0.52978515625, -0.99560546875, 0.424072265625, 0.83447265625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.533203125, -1.7294921875, 0.79345703125, 0.486328125, -0.6142578125, 0.357666015625, 0.581542968(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.2265625, -1.8759765625, 0.458984375, 0.904296875, -0.63037109375, 0.77880859375, 0.8212890625, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.880859375, -1.9853515625, 0.66552734375, 0.64892578125, -0.92138671875, 0.6689453125, 0.66259765(...TRUNCATED)
0.968239
0.830893
0.824646
0.837199
0.862508
0.957383
0.941224
0.830913
0.920372
0.634904
1
0
1
0.197884
0.180172
0.196275
0.191444
0.894372
0.894372
2.333333
1.367423
0.99473
0.830913
"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED)
"In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED)
"She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the verdict of the Supreme Court on the case involving the alleged offence committed by the(...TRUNCATED)
"In light of the above information, the verdict of the Supreme Court on the case involving the alleg(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** Whether the Accused-Appellant had the knowledge that her act would definitely lead to(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe Accused-Appellant had no knowledge that her act would definitely lead to the death o(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the Supreme Court's ruling on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED)
"The Supreme Court's ruling on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Penal Code(...TRUNCATED)
"The Supreme Court held that the Appellant's act of committing the alleged offence cannot be classif(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED)
"The Supreme Court did not directly answer the question regarding the Court of Appeal's interpretati(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.12109375, -0.73193359375, 0.65478515625, -0.26025390625, -0.515625, 0.06396484375, 1.796875, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.21875, -1.3115234375, 1.115234375, 0.1185302734375, -0.8046875, 1.0615234375, 1.33203125, -1.540(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.75, -1.42578125, 0.93115234375, -0.10882568359375, -0.8701171875, 1.4521484375, 1.298828125, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8291015625, -1.2529296875, 0.8857421875, 0.160400390625, -0.486328125, 1.076171875, 1.27734375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6337890625, -1.7021484375, 1.376953125, -0.48388671875, -0.9365234375, 0.131591796875, 0.6308593(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7158203125, -1.173828125, 0.97412109375, -0.2105712890625, -0.6826171875, 0.701171875, -0.214477(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6689453125, -1.0771484375, 0.71923828125, -0.2086181640625, -0.29736328125, 0.833984375, 1.40625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.9921875, -1.1982421875, 1.2060546875, -0.01666259765625, -0.93505859375, 1.0654296875, 1.1269531(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.291015625, -1.8994140625, 1.07421875, -0.004604339599609375, -0.93896484375, 0.99072265625, 0.63(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.111328125, -1.2275390625, 0.95068359375, -0.137939453125, -0.64111328125, 1.0703125, 1.096679687(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.759765625, -0.9423828125, 0.6171875, -0.1617431640625, -0.32421875, 0.69775390625, 1.087890625, (...TRUNCATED)
"[2.232421875, -1.384765625, 1.0283203125, 0.243408203125, -0.6357421875, 1.673828125, 0.94384765625(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.05078125, -1.1025390625, 1.0859375, -0.332275390625, -0.6298828125, 1.314453125, 1.2802734375, -(...TRUNCATED)
0.937711
0.733911
0.454653
0.920853
0.897999
0.868025
0.924589
0.703139
0.896871
0.619807
0
0.333333
0.666667
0.369627
0.630669
0.098157
0.366151
0.791519
0.820717
2.333333
0.636864
0.197414
0.703139
"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED)
"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)
"have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the proper interpretation of Circular P3 in the given case and how does it impact the decis(...TRUNCATED)
"The proper interpretation of Circular P3 in the given case is that it is not applicable to the case(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** How does the interpretation of Circular P3 in this case impact the petitioners' child(...TRUNCATED)
"**Answer:**\n\nThe interpretation of Circular P3 in this case impacts the petitioners' children's a(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 regarding the interpretation of Circu(...TRUNCATED)
"The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 and its (...TRUNCATED)
"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED)
"The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.330078125, -1.1865234375, 0.275146484375, -0.2421875, -0.77099609375, 0.004730224609375, 1.11132(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.0625, -1.8251953125, 0.84814453125, 0.77294921875, -1.474609375, 0.52294921875, 1.056640625, -1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.9560546875, -1.515625, -0.0021076202392578125, 0.44677734375, -0.53271484375, 0.473876953125, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.71875, -1.28125, 0.505859375, 0.4765625, -1.3701171875, 0.373779296875, 1.0009765625, -0.4013671(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2216796875, -0.88720703125, 0.51025390625, -0.374755859375, -0.9404296875, -0.6279296875, 0.9355(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.138671875, -1.8837890625, 0.35546875, -0.9912109375, -0.359619140625, -0.84521484375, 1.35742187(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.109375, -1.7177734375, 0.454833984375, -0.22998046875, -1.4169921875, -0.34228515625, 1.33203125(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.9140625, -1.3427734375, 0.296142578125, -0.379638671875, -1.0302734375, 0.083984375, 1.650390625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.921875, -1.5810546875, 0.91943359375, 0.61865234375, -1.2099609375, 0.36474609375, 1.4609375, -1(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.859375, -1.5263671875, 0.69873046875, 0.422119140625, -1.0546875, 0.28662109375, 0.9228515625, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.88525390625, -1.1767578125, 0.254150390625, 0.432861328125, -0.42529296875, 0.258544921875, 0.44(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.84765625, -1.9833984375, 0.287353515625, 0.71826171875, -1.1962890625, 0.666015625, 1.1201171875(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.501953125, -1.6884765625, 0.1580810546875, 0.40576171875, -1.1171875, 0.443603515625, 0.88085937(...TRUNCATED)
0.80448
0.539521
0.446098
0.65815
0.930905
0.860496
0.908293
0.547923
0.899898
0.580069
0
0
1
0.601
0.681971
0.481697
0.588223
0.735327
0.744309
2.333333
0.454517
0.083292
0.547923
"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED)
"Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No. (...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the proper procedure for the filing of a petition under Rule 8(3) of the Supreme Court Rule(...TRUNCATED)
"The proper procedure for the filing of a petition under Rule 8(3) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1990 (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the cas(...TRUNCATED)
"**Answer:**\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appe(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appea(...TRUNCATED)
"The two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents (later referred to as the Resp(...TRUNCATED)
"The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents are that the appeal is time-barred(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED)
"The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004. The first o(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.412109375, -1.736328125, -0.2047119140625, -0.4970703125, -0.7978515625, -0.1485595703125, 1.324(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8330078125, -2.193359375, 0.44775390625, 0.392333984375, -1.09765625, 0.90576171875, 0.653320312(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2685546875, -1.658203125, 0.61865234375, 0.65576171875, -1.0068359375, 0.430419921875, 0.4943847(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3359375, -1.8798828125, 0.499755859375, 0.77099609375, -1.0458984375, 0.44091796875, 0.947265625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1708984375, -0.20556640625, 1.212890625, -0.5224609375, -1.1015625, -0.1212158203125, 1.36132812(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3994140625, -1.65234375, -0.181396484375, -0.5703125, -0.72412109375, -0.187255859375, 0.9565429(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.53515625, -1.71875, 0.2242431640625, -0.36376953125, -1.31640625, 0.1358642578125, 1.2958984375,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1552734375, -1.240234375, 0.03875732421875, -0.0091552734375, -1.041015625, 0.265625, 0.71289062(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.32421875, -1.767578125, 1.0537109375, 0.21923828125, -0.92529296875, 0.8564453125, 1.037109375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1962890625, -1.8505859375, 0.99267578125, 0.445556640625, -1.5478515625, 0.63427734375, 0.805664(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3125, -1.5087890625, 0.152099609375, 0.27197265625, -0.97265625, 0.158447265625, 1.06640625, 0.4(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3779296875, -2.23046875, 0.52099609375, 0.373779296875, -1.1923828125, 0.4599609375, 0.491699218(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8251953125, -2.05078125, 0.8623046875, 0.330322265625, -1.2666015625, 0.70751953125, 0.492919921(...TRUNCATED)
0.967907
0.683587
0.963611
0.940486
0.906736
0.900988
0.925418
0.862561
0.911047
0.707279
0.333333
0.666667
0.333333
0.38873
0.039469
0.070514
0.166238
0.877652
0.889772
2.333333
1.404516
0.875566
0.862561
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
8