alignllm-introduction
Collection
Introduction of AlignLLM evaluation method • 15 items • Updated
question string | answer string | snippet string | answerGenerated string | temperature float64 | model string | question_answerGenerated_falcon string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon string | question_answerGenerated_gemma string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma string | question_answerGenerated_mistral string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral string | question_emb string | snippet_emb string | answer_emb string | answerGenerated_emb string | question_answerGenerated_falcon_emb string | question_answerGenerated_gemma_emb string | question_answerGenerated_mistral_emb string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb string | gold_standard_cos float64 | question_answerGenerated_falcon_cos float64 | question_answerGenerated_gemma_cos float64 | question_answerGenerated_mistral_cos float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_cos float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_cos float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_cos float64 | ILRSim float64 | answer_judge_cos_mean float64 | question_snippet_similarity float64 | iaa_fleiss_kappa float64 | iaa_fleiss_kappa_agreement float64 | iaa_fleiss_kappa_disagreement float64 | question_reconstruction_falcon_error float64 | question_reconstruction_gemma_error float64 | question_reconstruction_mistral_error float64 | ILRError float64 | ILRAlign float64 | WILRAlign float64 | question_bm25_score_mean float64 | question_rouge_score_mean float64 | question_bleu_score_mean float64 | question_alignment float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED) | "services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Suprem(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What were the grounds for the Petitioner's suspension and subsequent demobilization in the case of (...TRUNCATED) | "The grounds for the Petitioner's suspension and subsequent demobilization in the case of SC/FR/Appl(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What was the basis of the Petitioner's claim in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Applicat(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe Petitioner's claim in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 was based(...TRUNCATED) | "What was the Petitioner's argument in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 regardin(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner argued before the Supreme Court in case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 that his suspe(...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioner claimed that he was falsely implicated in a shooting incident and was suspended. Aft(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: \"The Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was (...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 claimed that his services we(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4853515625, -1.40625, 0.7509765625, -0.475341796875, -0.77978515625, -0.00719451904296875, 1.014(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.478515625, -1.95703125, 0.56640625, -0.158447265625, -1.2138671875, 0.5, 1.068359375, -1.2177734(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4560546875, -1.7861328125, 0.296630859375, 0.15966796875, -0.728515625, 0.438720703125, 1.144531(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.37109375, -2.107421875, 1.02734375, -0.0428466796875, -1.10546875, 0.59716796875, 1.052734375, -(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4189453125, -1.9677734375, 0.7060546875, -0.29296875, -1.091796875, -0.322509765625, 0.976074218(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.3349609375, -0.931640625, 0.032257080078125, -0.5380859375, -0.491455078125, -0.40478515625, 1.0(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.171875, -1.87109375, 0.70166015625, -0.529296875, -1.01953125, 0.07373046875, 1.0625, -0.5351562(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.6748046875, -1.748046875, 0.86669921875, -0.159423828125, -0.9033203125, 0.7158203125, 0.8374023(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.240234375, -2.09765625, 0.9169921875, -0.00661468505859375, -1.0634765625, 0.904296875, 0.411621(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.6787109375, -1.8203125, 0.62451171875, 0.2403564453125, -1.0869140625, 0.446533203125, 1.2060546(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.69873046875, -1.8779296875, 0.7138671875, -0.329345703125, -0.533203125, 1.12109375, 0.711914062(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.94140625, -1.8876953125, 1.1240234375, 0.3515625, -0.8408203125, 0.2249755859375, 0.8564453125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.6083984375, -1.7705078125, 0.69921875, 0.05230712890625, -1.0439453125, 0.375732421875, 1.223632(...TRUNCATED) | 0.903034 | 0.930429 | 0.896341 | 0.896464 | 0.854962 | 0.81637 | 0.954219 | 0.907744 | 0.875184 | 0.632492 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.075266 | 0.110516 | 0.123489 | 0.10309 | 0.919051 | 0.918984 | 2.474067 | 1.700326 | 1.002463 | 0.907744 |
"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED) | "The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011? | "In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What are the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. (...TRUNCATED) | "The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the specific legal issues that the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of S(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 consid(...TRUNCATED) | "In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED) | "The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, there is no explicit mention of the questions of law for which leave(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.3984375, -0.904296875, 0.25244140625, -0.53857421875, -1.0205078125, -0.387939453125, 1.47949218(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.9443359375, -1.185546875, -0.244873046875, 0.09429931640625, -0.326904296875, 0.396484375, 0.588(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.7177734375, -1.7958984375, 0.4951171875, 0.50048828125, -0.9423828125, 1.064453125, 1.2724609375(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2587890625, -1.6201171875, 0.8544921875, -0.00012743473052978516, -0.62939453125, 0.822265625, 0(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4755859375, -0.91748046875, 0.36474609375, -0.6279296875, -0.99169921875, -0.441162109375, 1.377(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4365234375, -0.796875, 0.3232421875, -0.66259765625, -0.8369140625, -0.2191162109375, 1.11035156(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.65966796875, -1.3857421875, 0.27001953125, -0.2227783203125, -0.07464599609375, 0.3525390625, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.548828125, -0.79443359375, 0.7666015625, 0.2042236328125, -0.87109375, 0.1522216796875, 1.100585(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.5400390625, -1.9951171875, 0.75341796875, -0.12115478515625, -1.1767578125, 1.1904296875, 1.0205(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.0625, -1.7138671875, 0.442626953125, 0.179931640625, -0.6591796875, 0.9248046875, 0.6025390625, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.5185546875, -0.7763671875, 0.818359375, 0.1871337890625, -0.96875, 0.28662109375, 1.109375, -0.4(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4521484375, -1.4482421875, 0.89794921875, 0.269775390625, -1.046875, 0.9814453125, 1.25, 0.00082(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.5458984375, -1.0283203125, 0.350830078125, 0.183837890625, -0.94677734375, 0.78271484375, 1.1064(...TRUNCATED) | 0.821415 | 0.986619 | 0.926849 | 0.672077 | 0.86339 | 0.7664 | 0.799559 | 0.861849 | 0.809783 | 0.596836 | 0.333333 | 0 | 1 | 0.018073 | 0.091465 | 0.378073 | 0.162537 | 0.799063 | 0.809134 | 2.335631 | 1.903998 | 1.467401 | 0.861849 |
"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED) | "1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 a(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the impugned provision of the Buil(...TRUNCATED) | "In 2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka ruled that the impugned provision of the Building Tax Act, (...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What key legal issues are addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal N(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the main legal issues that the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka considered in Case No. 8/2016, (...TRUNCATED) | "The main legal issues considered in Case No. 8/2016 by the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka were as follo(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka addressed several legal issues(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court case number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was a dispute between two parties identified a(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.634765625, -0.96875, -0.021759033203125, -0.95263671875, -0.7890625, -0.1915283203125, 1.4394531(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.94775390625, -1.2998046875, -0.470703125, -0.11309814453125, -0.181884765625, 0.283935546875, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.529296875, -1.7685546875, 0.9609375, 0.076416015625, -1.0908203125, 1.0546875, 1.1552734375, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.1572265625, -1.458984375, 0.7119140625, 0.5576171875, -0.83837890625, 0.767578125, 0.5595703125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4755859375, -1.0986328125, 0.279541015625, -0.18798828125, -0.775390625, -0.125, 1.19140625, 0.4(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.27734375, -0.849609375, -0.350341796875, -0.97216796875, -0.46435546875, 0.0165252685546875, 0.9(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2978515625, -1.8671875, 0.356689453125, -0.01177978515625, -0.315673828125, 0.451171875, 1.16894(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.7861328125, -0.517578125, 0.324951171875, 0.0701904296875, -0.61083984375, 0.31640625, 1.2324218(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.109375, -1.783203125, 0.349609375, 0.308349609375, -0.58642578125, 1.3037109375, 0.96533203125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2529296875, -1.4873046875, 0.8212890625, 0.271484375, -0.7744140625, 0.81689453125, 0.7236328125(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.7861328125, -0.517578125, 0.324951171875, 0.0701904296875, -0.61083984375, 0.31640625, 1.2324218(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.8583984375, -1.9345703125, 0.1251220703125, 0.0738525390625, -0.66845703125, 1.2939453125, 1.007(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2783203125, -1.212890625, 0.8525390625, -0.08734130859375, -0.685546875, 0.68603515625, 0.727050(...TRUNCATED) | 0.821441 | 0.821941 | 0.919536 | 0.712954 | 0.810953 | 0.768324 | 0.803117 | 0.818144 | 0.794131 | 0.58901 | 0 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.213185 | 0.09645 | 0.394062 | 0.234566 | 0.800906 | 0.801652 | 2.333333 | 1.518721 | 0.881552 | 0.818144 |
"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the rationale behind the Supreme Court's decision in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 20(...TRUNCATED) | "The rationale behind the Supreme Court's decision in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC (...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04(...TRUNCATED) | "**Answer:**\n\nThe main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before (...TRUNCATED) | "What was the key dispute in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 at the Supre(...TRUNCATED) | "The key dispute in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 at the Supreme Court (...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.54296875, -0.4755859375, 0.17919921875, -0.50537109375, -0.59228515625, -0.20849609375, 0.743164(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.17578125, -2.337890625, 0.145751953125, 0.3896484375, -1.0, 0.71533203125, 0.66650390625, -1.024(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.666015625, -1.2841796875, 0.1109619140625, 0.300537109375, -0.82861328125, 0.458740234375, 1.043(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.333984375, -1.814453125, 0.263916015625, 0.440673828125, -0.7607421875, 0.78076171875, 0.7568359(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.548828125, -0.73486328125, -0.29931640625, -0.5791015625, -0.64794921875, -0.436279296875, 1.264(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.4970703125, -0.55126953125, 0.11920166015625, -0.66796875, -0.55419921875, -0.322509765625, 0.49(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.7353515625, -1.0205078125, -0.0291748046875, -0.184814453125, -0.375732421875, 0.09942626953125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.607421875, -0.859375, 0.07745361328125, -0.238037109375, -0.77880859375, -0.016845703125, 0.3942(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.361328125, -1.1533203125, 0.263427734375, -0.363037109375, -0.91748046875, 0.259521484375, 0.624(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.236328125, -1.8359375, 0.4130859375, 0.2242431640625, -0.9814453125, 0.6591796875, 0.509765625, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.802734375, -1.1767578125, 0.38232421875, 0.1573486328125, -0.94140625, 0.2496337890625, 0.585449(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.83984375, -0.833984375, 0.41552734375, -0.11865234375, -0.80029296875, 0.1866455078125, 0.566894(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.04296875, -1.42578125, 0.09576416015625, 0.3154296875, -0.72021484375, 0.457763671875, 0.3776855(...TRUNCATED) | 0.91725 | 0.925803 | 0.971147 | 0.938452 | 0.889032 | 0.887369 | 0.955364 | 0.945134 | 0.910588 | 0.538402 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.092921 | 0.036464 | 0.076118 | 0.068501 | 0.901302 | 0.901104 | 2.417883 | 1.830538 | 1.420468 | 0.945134 |
"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED) | "The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED) | "1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the verdict of the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. A(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka have not yet ma(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What is the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 is Dr. Sh(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the composition of the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. (...TRUNCATED) | "The judicial panel for Supreme Court Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 consists of three judges: D(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Sr(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED) | "The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.185546875, -1.1240234375, 0.61328125, -0.453369140625, -0.599609375, -0.426025390625, 1.26757812(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.560546875, -1.2763671875, -0.044281005859375, 0.0426025390625, -0.1396484375, -0.14306640625, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2470703125, -1.2080078125, 0.48095703125, 0.04376220703125, -0.10406494140625, -0.126220703125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.1650390625, -1.1650390625, 0.497802734375, 0.0048980712890625, -0.08795166015625, -0.05709838867(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.865234375, -1.591796875, 1.1484375, -0.46630859375, -0.76220703125, -0.53759765625, 0.7875976562(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.431640625, -1.107421875, 0.449951171875, -0.60302734375, -0.53466796875, -0.3310546875, 0.606445(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.498046875, -1.1328125, 0.69921875, -0.25927734375, -0.88818359375, -0.20849609375, 1.03125, -0.0(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.7470703125, -0.98291015625, 0.38916015625, 0.254638671875, -0.161865234375, -0.255615234375, 0.6(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2685546875, -1.185546875, 0.258544921875, -0.6865234375, -1.2744140625, 0.783203125, 1.102539062(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.974609375, -1.01953125, 0.5234375, 0.29296875, -0.373046875, 0.035003662109375, 0.87939453125, -(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.0390625, -0.98779296875, 0.3134765625, 0.0419921875, -0.06414794921875, -0.14453125, 0.710449218(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.68994140625, -1.5576171875, 0.67529296875, 0.2474365234375, -0.1435546875, 0.26513671875, 0.7846(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2470703125, -1.2080078125, 0.48095703125, 0.04376220703125, -0.10406494140625, -0.126220703125, (...TRUNCATED) | 0.974798 | 0.889279 | 0.865002 | 0.886231 | 0.874605 | 0.961555 | 1 | 0.88017 | 0.945387 | 0.548209 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.128518 | 0.151235 | 0.136809 | 0.138854 | 0.887954 | 0.887647 | 2.335287 | 1.914286 | 1.671777 | 0.88017 |
"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED) | "SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The criteria that the respondents relied on to counter the petitioner's claim in the case S(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the relevant criteria for evaluating the experience of a person in the position of Director(...TRUNCATED) | "The relevant criteria for evaluating the experience of a person in the position of Director of SPMD(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What are the criteria that the respondents relied on to counter the petitioner's clai(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petitioner’s own petition,(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the specific criteria in the marking scheme used by the respondents to challenge the peti(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific criteria used by the respondents to challenge the petitioner's claim for additional ma(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the criteria of direct relevant(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED) | "The Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 countered the Petitioner's claim by relyin(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.841796875, -1.73046875, 0.01983642578125, -0.439453125, -1.2587890625, -0.58154296875, 1.0351562(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.8408203125, -1.7236328125, 0.2037353515625, 0.8271484375, -1.337890625, 0.740234375, 0.267089843(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.978515625, -1.4892578125, 0.427734375, 0.1871337890625, -1.5849609375, 1.47265625, 0.25708007812(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.115234375, -1.2392578125, 0.76025390625, 0.2763671875, -1.41796875, 1.0625, 0.353271484375, -0.6(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.1435546875, -0.81689453125, 0.85791015625, 0.052947998046875, -1.181640625, 0.07818603515625, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.943359375, -1.515625, 0.61328125, -0.669921875, -0.9501953125, -0.60400390625, 0.98828125, 0.134(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.23046875, -1.39453125, 1.1689453125, 0.0633544921875, -1.2490234375, -0.321044921875, 0.54248046(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.150390625, -1.12109375, 0.76953125, 0.21142578125, -1.2607421875, 1.326171875, 0.285400390625, -(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.482421875, -1.0126953125, 0.576171875, 0.6484375, -1.44921875, 1.404296875, 0.1563720703125, -1.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.998046875, -1.396484375, 0.966796875, 0.72607421875, -1.794921875, 1.0771484375, 0.19140625, -1.(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.259765625, -1.146484375, 0.46240234375, 0.06915283203125, -1.6025390625, 1.3984375, 0.3422851562(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.1171875, -1.69140625, 0.118408203125, 0.1781005859375, -1.458984375, 1.32421875, 0.77392578125, (...TRUNCATED) | "[2.166015625, -1.2470703125, 0.5322265625, 0.0877685546875, -1.5634765625, 0.98095703125, 0.4245605(...TRUNCATED) | 0.928559 | 0.514192 | 0.91726 | 0.699376 | 0.928658 | 0.958844 | 0.914961 | 0.710276 | 0.934154 | 0.609456 | 0 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.725557 | 0.089381 | 0.355754 | 0.390231 | 0.803958 | 0.824634 | 2.333333 | 1.257937 | 0.483795 | 0.710276 |
"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED) | "Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distric(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the appellant's evidence to support his claim for title to the land in the District Court o(...TRUNCATED) | "In the provided snippet, the appellant's evidence to support his claim for title includes the claim(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What was the main argument of the defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negomb(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case argued that he had prescri(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the arguments made by the defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case regar(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case argued for his right to the land base(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land in question, known as Muthurajawela(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.51953125, -0.89208984375, 0.211669921875, 0.08563232421875, -0.0278778076171875, -0.126342773437(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.150390625, -2.2421875, 0.58935546875, 0.52490234375, -1.2333984375, 0.609375, 0.91943359375, -1.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.6015625, -1.9794921875, 0.837890625, 0.6142578125, -1.2041015625, 0.2103271484375, 0.7998046875,(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.619140625, -2.029296875, 0.93701171875, 0.6142578125, -0.82763671875, 0.360107421875, 0.65234375(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.142578125, -1.4560546875, 0.83740234375, 0.548828125, -0.763671875, -0.38232421875, 0.517578125,(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.7529296875, -0.97705078125, 0.8251953125, -0.08935546875, -0.2109375, -0.27001953125, 0.56884765(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.181640625, -1.787109375, 0.98046875, 0.08563232421875, -0.39208984375, -0.33935546875, 1.1533203(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.28515625, -2.017578125, 0.86572265625, 0.7822265625, -0.96435546875, 0.379150390625, 0.648925781(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.654296875, -1.9189453125, 0.80029296875, 0.396240234375, -0.771484375, 0.254638671875, 0.625, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.71484375, -2.00390625, 0.884765625, 0.52978515625, -0.99560546875, 0.424072265625, 0.83447265625(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.533203125, -1.7294921875, 0.79345703125, 0.486328125, -0.6142578125, 0.357666015625, 0.581542968(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.2265625, -1.8759765625, 0.458984375, 0.904296875, -0.63037109375, 0.77880859375, 0.8212890625, -(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.880859375, -1.9853515625, 0.66552734375, 0.64892578125, -0.92138671875, 0.6689453125, 0.66259765(...TRUNCATED) | 0.968239 | 0.830893 | 0.824646 | 0.837199 | 0.862508 | 0.957383 | 0.941224 | 0.830913 | 0.920372 | 0.634904 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.197884 | 0.180172 | 0.196275 | 0.191444 | 0.894372 | 0.894372 | 2.333333 | 1.367423 | 0.99473 | 0.830913 |
"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED) | "She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the verdict of the Supreme Court on the case involving the alleged offence committed by the(...TRUNCATED) | "In light of the above information, the verdict of the Supreme Court on the case involving the alleg(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** Whether the Accused-Appellant had the knowledge that her act would definitely lead to(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Accused-Appellant had no knowledge that her act would definitely lead to the death o(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the Supreme Court's ruling on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court's ruling on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Penal Code(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court held that the Appellant's act of committing the alleged offence cannot be classif(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court did not directly answer the question regarding the Court of Appeal's interpretati(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.12109375, -0.73193359375, 0.65478515625, -0.26025390625, -0.515625, 0.06396484375, 1.796875, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.21875, -1.3115234375, 1.115234375, 0.1185302734375, -0.8046875, 1.0615234375, 1.33203125, -1.540(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.75, -1.42578125, 0.93115234375, -0.10882568359375, -0.8701171875, 1.4521484375, 1.298828125, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.8291015625, -1.2529296875, 0.8857421875, 0.160400390625, -0.486328125, 1.076171875, 1.27734375, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.6337890625, -1.7021484375, 1.376953125, -0.48388671875, -0.9365234375, 0.131591796875, 0.6308593(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.7158203125, -1.173828125, 0.97412109375, -0.2105712890625, -0.6826171875, 0.701171875, -0.214477(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.6689453125, -1.0771484375, 0.71923828125, -0.2086181640625, -0.29736328125, 0.833984375, 1.40625(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.9921875, -1.1982421875, 1.2060546875, -0.01666259765625, -0.93505859375, 1.0654296875, 1.1269531(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.291015625, -1.8994140625, 1.07421875, -0.004604339599609375, -0.93896484375, 0.99072265625, 0.63(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.111328125, -1.2275390625, 0.95068359375, -0.137939453125, -0.64111328125, 1.0703125, 1.096679687(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.759765625, -0.9423828125, 0.6171875, -0.1617431640625, -0.32421875, 0.69775390625, 1.087890625, (...TRUNCATED) | "[2.232421875, -1.384765625, 1.0283203125, 0.243408203125, -0.6357421875, 1.673828125, 0.94384765625(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.05078125, -1.1025390625, 1.0859375, -0.332275390625, -0.6298828125, 1.314453125, 1.2802734375, -(...TRUNCATED) | 0.937711 | 0.733911 | 0.454653 | 0.920853 | 0.897999 | 0.868025 | 0.924589 | 0.703139 | 0.896871 | 0.619807 | 0 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.369627 | 0.630669 | 0.098157 | 0.366151 | 0.791519 | 0.820717 | 2.333333 | 0.636864 | 0.197414 | 0.703139 |
"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED) | "have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the proper interpretation of Circular P3 in the given case and how does it impact the decis(...TRUNCATED) | "The proper interpretation of Circular P3 in the given case is that it is not applicable to the case(...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** How does the interpretation of Circular P3 in this case impact the petitioners' child(...TRUNCATED) | "**Answer:**\n\nThe interpretation of Circular P3 in this case impacts the petitioners' children's a(...TRUNCATED) | "What was the main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 regarding the interpretation of Circu(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 and its (...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.330078125, -1.1865234375, 0.275146484375, -0.2421875, -0.77099609375, 0.004730224609375, 1.11132(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.0625, -1.8251953125, 0.84814453125, 0.77294921875, -1.474609375, 0.52294921875, 1.056640625, -1.(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.9560546875, -1.515625, -0.0021076202392578125, 0.44677734375, -0.53271484375, 0.473876953125, 0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.71875, -1.28125, 0.505859375, 0.4765625, -1.3701171875, 0.373779296875, 1.0009765625, -0.4013671(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2216796875, -0.88720703125, 0.51025390625, -0.374755859375, -0.9404296875, -0.6279296875, 0.9355(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.138671875, -1.8837890625, 0.35546875, -0.9912109375, -0.359619140625, -0.84521484375, 1.35742187(...TRUNCATED) | "[2.109375, -1.7177734375, 0.454833984375, -0.22998046875, -1.4169921875, -0.34228515625, 1.33203125(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.9140625, -1.3427734375, 0.296142578125, -0.379638671875, -1.0302734375, 0.083984375, 1.650390625(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.921875, -1.5810546875, 0.91943359375, 0.61865234375, -1.2099609375, 0.36474609375, 1.4609375, -1(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.859375, -1.5263671875, 0.69873046875, 0.422119140625, -1.0546875, 0.28662109375, 0.9228515625, -(...TRUNCATED) | "[0.88525390625, -1.1767578125, 0.254150390625, 0.432861328125, -0.42529296875, 0.258544921875, 0.44(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.84765625, -1.9833984375, 0.287353515625, 0.71826171875, -1.1962890625, 0.666015625, 1.1201171875(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.501953125, -1.6884765625, 0.1580810546875, 0.40576171875, -1.1171875, 0.443603515625, 0.88085937(...TRUNCATED) | 0.80448 | 0.539521 | 0.446098 | 0.65815 | 0.930905 | 0.860496 | 0.908293 | 0.547923 | 0.899898 | 0.580069 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.601 | 0.681971 | 0.481697 | 0.588223 | 0.735327 | 0.744309 | 2.333333 | 0.454517 | 0.083292 | 0.547923 |
"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED) | "Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No. (...TRUNCATED) | 0.1 | llama | "What is the proper procedure for the filing of a petition under Rule 8(3) of the Supreme Court Rule(...TRUNCATED) | "The proper procedure for the filing of a petition under Rule 8(3) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1990 (...TRUNCATED) | "**Question:** What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the cas(...TRUNCATED) | "**Answer:**\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appe(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appea(...TRUNCATED) | "The two preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents (later referred to as the Resp(...TRUNCATED) | "The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents are that the appeal is time-barred(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004. The first o(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.412109375, -1.736328125, -0.2047119140625, -0.4970703125, -0.7978515625, -0.1485595703125, 1.324(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.8330078125, -2.193359375, 0.44775390625, 0.392333984375, -1.09765625, 0.90576171875, 0.653320312(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.2685546875, -1.658203125, 0.61865234375, 0.65576171875, -1.0068359375, 0.430419921875, 0.4943847(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.3359375, -1.8798828125, 0.499755859375, 0.77099609375, -1.0458984375, 0.44091796875, 0.947265625(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.1708984375, -0.20556640625, 1.212890625, -0.5224609375, -1.1015625, -0.1212158203125, 1.36132812(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.3994140625, -1.65234375, -0.181396484375, -0.5703125, -0.72412109375, -0.187255859375, 0.9565429(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.53515625, -1.71875, 0.2242431640625, -0.36376953125, -1.31640625, 0.1358642578125, 1.2958984375,(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.1552734375, -1.240234375, 0.03875732421875, -0.0091552734375, -1.041015625, 0.265625, 0.71289062(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.32421875, -1.767578125, 1.0537109375, 0.21923828125, -0.92529296875, 0.8564453125, 1.037109375, (...TRUNCATED) | "[1.1962890625, -1.8505859375, 0.99267578125, 0.445556640625, -1.5478515625, 0.63427734375, 0.805664(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.3125, -1.5087890625, 0.152099609375, 0.27197265625, -0.97265625, 0.158447265625, 1.06640625, 0.4(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.3779296875, -2.23046875, 0.52099609375, 0.373779296875, -1.1923828125, 0.4599609375, 0.491699218(...TRUNCATED) | "[1.8251953125, -2.05078125, 0.8623046875, 0.330322265625, -1.2666015625, 0.70751953125, 0.492919921(...TRUNCATED) | 0.967907 | 0.683587 | 0.963611 | 0.940486 | 0.906736 | 0.900988 | 0.925418 | 0.862561 | 0.911047 | 0.707279 | 0.333333 | 0.666667 | 0.333333 | 0.38873 | 0.039469 | 0.070514 | 0.166238 | 0.877652 | 0.889772 | 2.333333 | 1.404516 | 0.875566 | 0.862561 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3