Split (1)

train · 2.59M rows

text stringlengths 12 37.3k
He said there was a breach of Mr Shatter's rights because of the defective procedure that was adopted.
Mr Justice Ryan also said Mr Guerin was working under pressure dealing with such a large amount of documentary material under severe time constraint.
He said Mr Guerin was in error, but said he was very far from being personally critical of him in the overall context of what he had to do.
The matter will come back before the Court of Appeal later this month to decide what orders or declarations the court should make.
Taoiseach Enda Kenny said he acknowledged that the court had clearly found in favour of Mr Shatter, but said he had not read the judgment.
Asked if he accepted the contention by the former minister that Mr Kenny had indicated he had no confidence in him, prior to his resignation, Mr Kenny said people should read the letter Mr Shatter wrote, setting out the grounds as to why he considered he should retire from office.
When asked if he had ignored concerns expressed about the Guerin investigation, the Taoiseach said he would refer questions about this to "the very clear letter that was written by Alan himself".
Mr Kenny refused to say whether Mr Shatter was owed an apology in light of the Court of Appeal ruling.
He said lots of people lost their Dáil seats at the last election and this was a part of the democratic process.
The Taoiseach said the O'Higgins Report had confirmed that Mr Shatter had done his work well.
He said he was "fully in favour of his abilities as a minister" and that he gave him full credit for the manner in which he carried out his duties during his time in office.
Mr Guerin's report, published more than two years ago in May 2014, was a report to the Taoiseach about how allegations made by Sergeant Maurice McCabe about garda misconduct were handled.
Mr Shatter resigned as Minister for Justice the day after the report was published.
He claimed the report contained damaging findings and conclusions about him and he was not given any opportunity to rebut them or reply to them.
Mr Shatter went to the High Court, to try to have the findings relating to him quashed, but his case was comprehensively dismissed.
Mr Guerin had claimed he had been asked to carry out a "scoping report" to decide if a Commission of Inquiry was necessary.
The subsequent report by the commission, chaired by former High Court judge Kevin O'Higgins, found Mr Shatter had acted properly at all times.
Mr Guerin was given eight weeks to complete his work - it could have been extended if necessary but the Appeal Court said it was not open to him to embark on a process that would greatly exceed the time allowed.
Mr Justice Ryan found the Guerin Report made severe criticisms of Mr Shatter in the conduct of his office, which were seriously damaging to his good name.
The judge found it was open to Mr Guerin to carry out his work as a documentary review instead of conducting extensive interviews.
He was expressly authorised to interview people but not obliged to.
He said he did not think Mr Guerin could be criticised for deciding to proceed as he did.
But Mr Justice Ryan said none of the points highlighted by the High Court judge in relation to the nature of Mr Guerin's inquiry were a justification for abandoning every element of fair procedures.
Time constraints, the number of people involved and the nature of their involvement, and the general nature of the investigative process were all relevant matters when it came to deciding the nature of the protection required by law.
He said it was not lawful to decide there was no time or no sufficient time to allow for procedural rights to be exercised.
Mr Justice Ryan said that Mr Guerin had been asked to perform a Herculean task.
He said it was not easy to see how he could have completed his work in the time permitted if he had conducted his examination in accordance with the full range of fair procedures.
But he said that was not what Mr Shatter had sought.
The Appeal Court also ruled the report was not just a Senior Counsel's opinion.
He said Mr Guerin had been entrusted with an important and urgent undertaking on a matter of national concern.
He was entitled to express opinions and make judgments and reach conclusions, the judge found.
But there were consequences to whichever course he pursued, the court ruled.
There was no obligation to hear the other side in the event of potential criticism, if there was not going to be any criticism of particular people. But the situation was quite different if criticism of individuals was in question.
If it was a preliminary scoping report and no more, care was needed to keep opinions and conclusions appropriate to that function and it should not have said this person or these people made errors or should be criticised.
Mr Justice Ryan said the danger was that the intended preliminary inquiry might trespass on the remit of the proposed Commission of Investigation and in his view that was what happened in this case.
The judge said natural justice and fair procedures are required in inquiries such as that conducted by Mr Guerin, unless there were particular reasons for excluding them.
He said Mr Guerin was mistaken in thinking he was under no obligation to ensure the appropriate level of concern for Mr Shatter's position in light of what he was proposing to submit to the Government as his conclusions.
He said it must be considered absolutely fundamental that before a person is severely criticised in a significant public undertaking by an eminent person in a report to the Government, about a matter of urgent national importance, that he or she would be given at least some notice of the criticisms and opportunity to c...
The judge also disagreed with the High Court judge that Mr Shatter could not legally challenge a decision taken by a government of which he was a member.
Mr Justice Ryan said he did not think such a position made legal or Constitutional sense and did not accord with logic.
He said he also disagreed with the High Court that Mr Shatter's legal challenge was a "collateral attack" on the Commission of Inquiry set up after the Guerin Report.
Mr Justice Ryan said the High Court judge had made a legitimate criticism of Mr Shatter about an allegation of bias which Mr Shatter made against Mr Guerin and then later withdrew.
Mr Justice Ryan said Mr Shatter was too quick to jump to the wrong conclusion.
However, the judge said Mr Shatter had withdrawn the allegation, although he could have been more gracious.
He said law and justice and protection of human rights do not exist only for those who are moderate, careful and reasonable and ready to apologise when they should do so, and he also found fair procedures are not just there to protect people they are also there to improve the quality of the outcome of the investigative...
Mr Shatter said the Court of Appeal's decision was a huge relief.
He said he resigned his position after Taoiseach Enda Kenny said he could no longer express confidence in him.
The former minister said Mr Guerin made his findings without ever speaking with him or giving him the opportunity to address his concerns.
He said he was critical of this to the Taoiseach at the time of his resignation and in the Dáil, but the Taoiseach, and Frances Fitzgerald, his successor as Minister for Justice, had ignored his concerns.
Speaking on RTÉ's Six One, Mr Shatter said he believes legislation should be enacted to ensure that there are prescribed rules for the conduct of non-statutory informal inquiries in the future.
He said it is hoped, in the future, that no one conducting a non-statutory inquiry would be free to criticise individuals and damage their good name without giving them an opportunity to be heard.
He refused to be drawn on whether the Taoiseach should apologise to him, saying it is for the Taoiseach to consider how he should deal with the matter.
Mr Shatter said he hopes today's ruling will be an end to the litigation.
Earlier, he said the Guerin Report still remained in the public domain despite the report of the O'Higgins Commission of Investigation which totally contradicted the adverse conclusions about him in the earlier report.
Mr Shatter said he took the court proceedings to challenge the findings of the Guerin Report which did enormous damage to his good name and cost him his position as Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence.
He said this was a job he loved and a position he felt privileged to hold.
He said he had no doubt the report's conclusions had also contributed to the loss of his Dáil seat earlier this year.
However, he said he had also challenged the report to make sure that in future no one conducting a non-statutory inquiry would be free to criticise individuals and damage their good name without affording them an opportunity to be heard.
He said the Court of Appeal ruling had upheld and reaffirmed important constitutional values, central to our constitutional democracy.
Mr Shatter thanked the judges and his legal team.
He said he particularly thanked his family and close friends, saying the value of their support over the past two very difficult and stressful years could not be overestimated.
Israel: the age of permanent war?
For almost three years [after the 2006 Lebanon war], there were no illusions; we knew that we were training for Gaza. Unlike Lebanon, we knew that when we entered Gaza, the military goals and the execution of the missions in order to reach those goals would be methodical and well-prepared.
The IDF entered Gaza with realistic goals-significantly reduce Hamas’ ability to inflict damage on Israel and Israeli targets. We were told specifically that our goal was NOT to topple Hamas and was NOT to destroy all of its capabilities. Those goals would have been too difficult to achieve and would have set us up for...
This makes tactical sense, I suppose. But I worry about its long-term implications for the security of Israel, especially the notion of not fighting by the rules, which the article doesn’t really explain, but which I think if done badly could further undermine Western popular support for Israel.
Flights to Milwaukee begin in March and will go head-to-head with service by rival Alaska Air.
Delta Air Lines will add nonstop service between Seattle and Milwaukee, another route that will put it into direct competition with rival Alaska Airlines.
Delta’s Seattle-Milwaukee route will begin March 9, with Delta Connection affiliate SkyWest flying one daily round-trip flight on 76-seat Embraer E175 aircraft.
Delta will face direct competition from Alaska Air, which operates one daily round-trip flight between the cities on Embraer E175 jets. Alaska Air’s flights on the route also are operated by SkyWest, which flies as a regional partner for Alaska Air under a separate agreement.
Southwest currently flies nonstop between Milwaukee and Seattle, but its current nonstop service on the route is scheduled to end Jan. 4. That would leave Alaska Airlines as the sole carrier on the route until Delta’s route begins in March.
Delta and Alaska, of course, have been engaged in a multi-year turf battle at Seattle-Tacoma International (SEA). The carriers were once close partners, but Delta has since developed SEA as a significant hub, adding numerous routes that now compete head-to-head with Seattle-based Alaska.
The competition has sent passenger numbers soaring at SEA, which has reported a number of monthly and annual passenger records since 2010.
Reader Charles decided to be adventurous and try Firefox. He likes it, he says, save for one problem: "It crashes almost every time I use it and sometimes several times a session. I still prefer it over other programs but it sure is annoying. If I have any serious work to do, I go back to Internet Explorer."
Good call, Charles. I can't tell you how many times I've had to counsel users on this very problem. Usually it starts like this: "My browser keeps crashing, I think I have a virus."
Believe it or not, viruses aren't always to blame for browser problems. If your browser gets hijacked, meaning it goes to sites you don't want it to go to or seems impossible to control properly, that's indicative of some kind of malware infection.
But everyday crashes? That's more likely the result of bad code, either on the sites you're visiting or in one or more extensions you've installed (particularly in Firefox).
Stuff like this can be difficult to troubleshoot. So my first piece of advice to users in your boat is exactly what you've already done: try a different browser. If IE's giving you trouble, try Firefox. If Firefox doesn't work properly, try Google Chrome. (Heck, throw Opera and Safari into the mix. Any "different brows...
You're already halfway there, Charles. If IE works properly with sites that crash in Firefox, then some plug-in or extension in the latter is almost certainly to blame. Your only real option is to uninstall Firefox (preferably with a tool like Advanced Uninstaller, which should wipe all traces of it), reboot, and then ...
Then, before adding any plug-ins or extensions, see if the crashes continue. If not, install the add-ons you want--but only one at a time, and perhaps a few days apart.
I know all this is a hassle, but unless you're willing to abandon your buggy browser entirely, it's your best bet.
Summer is just around the corner so I have been busy trying to plan and prepare. I have been brainstorming with friends, getting my grant applications in order, discussing extended school year (ESY) with Jack's teacher, and trying to decide what activities will be on the schedule this summer.
Jack does extremely well during the school year. He excels with his structured routine of school five days a week, and Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA)/social group therapy three days a week. It makes life predictable and helps keep the number of meltdowns and behaviors to a minimum. Summer, unfortunately, gives more ...
The past two summers I have been learning and I always reflect back while preparing for the next. Jack's first summer break, he was still very young. He was four years old and his younger sibling, Peyton, was one. I was unaware of how difficult it would be to go from a six-hour, five-day-a-week schedule to, pretty much...
Jack did qualified for ESY, but since that only accounted for five of the 12-week summer, I found myself with lots of down time. Jack needs guidance to make play time productive, because playing by himself would lead to hours spent on his iPad or lining up cars and trains. The communication obstacle also made even a si...
Last summer was much better, but also came with its own challenges. My husband was going to be gone most of the season on business so I knew planning was going to be key. But I was at a loss for what would be beneficial and enjoyable for both my kids. Thankfully my amazing friend, Candace, came to my rescue.
She arranged a family class with Gymboree Play and Music for kids on the spectrum and siblings, which we attended once a week. She also arranged a weekly sensory jump with the local trampoline park, which was a big hit with both my kids. She introduced me to the world of grants, which are a great resource to help speci...
Planning our summers has become another important part of my job as a autism mom. I have two summers under my belt and many more ahead. I am blessed to have a wonderfully supportive family who plan trips to Texas to help. I have an amazing group of special need parent friends who are there to help plan and spend time w...
One thing on our agenda this summer is both kids will be taking swim lessons at Aqua Fit in Plano. I am excited about this opportunity and so is the owner Mimi Conner, who has expressed great interest at providing swim lessons for other autism and special need families in the future. I hope to find more to add to our s...
Follow me on Twitter, @les24d.
Syracuse, N.Y. -- The hockey community across the world has joined in a heart-tugging tribute to the victim of the Humboldt Broncos bus crash by leaving sticks outside their doors at night.
Fifteen people on that bus died in Friday's accident in Saskatchewan, and the thinking is some of them might need the equipment for the afterlife.
"They were putting sticks outside for wherever they are. If they wanted to play they could come pick one up, I think was the idea,'' said Syracuse Crunch goalie Connor Ingram.
Ingram, as a netminder, thought a different gesture was appropriate for him.
But if there was ever a time to look toward the healing powers of hope, faith and hockey, this is it.
Especially for players like Ingram.
Ingram grew up in Imperial, Saskatchewan, a little more than an hour from Humboldt. He played two seasons of youth hockey in the Broncos' program, as a 13- and 15-year-old.
Ingram, 21, said he knew four players on the Broncos' bus. One who died, Logan Schatz, was captain of the team.
In the picture that Ingram tweeted below from their days as teammates in junior hockey, Schatz is the one wearing the 'C.' Ingram is the goalie lying down in front.
Another player on the bus, Kaleb Dahlgren, is so close to Ingram that Ingram said Dahlgren would likely be his best man if he got married tomorrow. Dahlgren is recovering in the hospital.
"Connor's a tough guy. Certainly he's feeling a lot of emotion. There's no playbook or instruction for how you stickhandle through something like this,'' said Ingram's older brother, Bryce.

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.