Datasets:

---

Recag

/

Rp_CommonC_231

like 0

ERROR: type should be string, got "https://profreg.medscape.com/px/getpracticeprofile.do?method=getProfessionalProfile&urlCache=aHR0cHM6Ly9lbWVkaWNpbmUubWVkc2NhcGUuY29tL2FydGljbGUvMTg4MzYwOC1vdmVydmlldw==\nBedside Ultrasonography for Pneumothorax\nAuthor: Randi Ozaki, MD; Chief Editor: Caroline R Taylor, MD more...\nSections Bedside Ultrasonography for Pneumothorax\nThis article discusses the theoretical and practical aspects of using bedside ultrasonography for pneumothorax. Although the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination has been part of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) for over a decade, [1] the addition of pneumothorax evaluation to this protocol to create the extended FAST (e-FAST) examination is a relatively new development.\nOver the past 15 years, the use of bedside ultrasonography in the emergency department (ED) has revolutionized patient care. [2] Trauma patients, who are particularly vulnerable to the complications of delayed diagnostic studies, have benefited tremendously from rapid ultrasound-guided evaluation at the bedside. [3, 4, 5] In 2011, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma updated their guidelines, giving a level 2 recommendation for the use of thoracic ultrasound to diagnose pneumothorax. [6]\nThe traditional initial evaluation of patients with a suspected traumatic pneumothorax was with chest radiography, typically performed with the patient in the supine position so as to preserve cervical spine immobilization. However, this method is grossly inadequate for detecting pneumothoraces, with sensitivities as low as 36–48% in some studies. [7] Given the low sensitivity of portable chest x-ray, ultrasound has also been suggested as an alternative to portable chest x-ray in the detection of traumatic pneumothorax. In a retrospective review performed at a level I trauma center, ultrasound was shown to predict the absence of pneumothorax with 93.8% sensitivity and a negative predictive value of 99.9% when compared to chest x-ray. One pneumothorax was missed on ultrasound that was visualized on chest x-ray; however, this was a small, low anterior pneumothorax that was not clinically significant. All patients in this study who required tube thoracostomy placement had pneumothoraces that were detected on ultrasound. These findings suggest that for clinically significant pneumothoraces, ultrasound is a feasible alternative or replacement for portable chest x-ray, as it is more readily available and has higher sensitivity. [8]\nIn a retrospective study, the diagnostic accuracy of the e-FAST was compared to that of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and of invasive interventions. With the use of CT scanning, 87 pneumothoraces were detected among the 763 lung fields studies; with the use of ultrasound, 67 of 87 pneumothoraces were detected. Of the 20 missed, 17 were considered mild and not life-threatening. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound in this study was found to have a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 99.8%. Although ultrasonography may not be as diagnostically accurate as CT scanning, CT is limited in unstable patients, and this limitation can result in delayed diagnosis and treatment. [9]\nAlthough bedside sonography was first implemented by emergency medicine physicians, it is now used by multiple specialties, including radiologists, [10] surgeons, and adult and pediatric intensivists. [11, 12] Furthermore, in addition to its traditional use in the ED, bedside ultrasound is starting to be used to confirm central line placement [13] and to monitor postoperative patients. [14, 15] Studies have also shown that bedside ultrasonography is a valuable tool in diagnosing iatrogenic pneumothoraces. [16] In the past few years, there has been an international effort to standardize the application of lung ultrasound, and in 2011, the International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) published a set of evidence-based recommendations for lung ultrasound, including the application of ultrasound for the detection of pneumothorax. [17]\nUltrasound use has also been suggested as a feasible diagnostic tool in the prehospital setting. In a transport vehicle, ambient noise and movement may limit physical exam and delay diagnosis. In a prospective, observational study, nonphysician aeromedical providers were trained to perform and interpret thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothoraces in adult trauma patients and adult medical patients requiring endotracheal intubation. Twenty pneumothoraces and one mainstem intubation were identified, of which 16 were correctly identified and the mainstem intubation was incorrectly diagnosed. Prehospital ultrasound had a sensitivity of 68% (95% confidence interval (CI) 46-85%), a specificity of 96% (95% CI 90-98%), and an overall accuracy of 91% (95% CI 85-95%). In comparison, ED ultrasound had a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 62-94%), a specificity of 98% (95% CI 93-99%), and an accuracy of 96% (95% CI 90-98%). [18]\nIt is critical to maintain a high suspicion for a pneumothorax in all trauma patients with a significant mechanism, as well as in nontrauma patients with a history or physical findings suggestive of the diagnosis.\nPneumothorax should be considered in the following clinical situations:\nPenetrating trauma to the thorax and abdomen\nBlunt trauma to the thorax or abdomen\nBlunt trauma with a significant mechanism (eg, a high-speed motor vehicle accident or a major fall)\nMultiple-trauma patients\nPost-procedures involving the thorax (eg, thoracentesis, internal jugular or subclavian central line placement)\nThe following signs are suggestive of pneumothorax:\nRespiratory distress\nDecreased or absent lung sounds, especially if unilateral\nResistance to ventilation (eg, patients who are \"hard to bag\")\nTachycardia (a nonspecific but common finding)\nJugular venous distention\nTracheal deviation (a late finding in tension pneumothorax)\nThe following symptoms are suggestive of pneumothorax:\nThere are no specific contraindications for bedside ultrasonography in the ED; clinical judgment should be used to determine its appropriate application. Patients with significant pulmonary disease and previous pneumothoraces may have altered findings on ultrasound examinations. In these special circumstances, patients should undergo definitive imaging with thoracic CT scanning when stable.\nSuccessful application of ultrasonography to the detection of pneumothorax requires a solid understanding of the basic anatomy and pathophysiology of the pulmonary system. Both lungs are divided into lobes. The gross functional subunits of each lung are called segments. The right lung comprises 10 segments: 3 in the right upper lobe (apical, anterior and medial), 2 in the right middle lobe (medial and lateral), and 5 in the right lower lobe (superior, medial, anterior, lateral, and posterior). The left lung comprises 8 segments: 4 in the left upper lobe (apicoposterior, anterior, superior lingula, and inferior lingula) and 4 in the left lower lobe (superior, anteromedial, lateral, and posterior). For more information about the relevant anatomy, see Lung Anatomy.\nNormally, the lungs are covered by a continuous serous membrane that folds back on itself to create 2 layers: the visceral pleura, which covers the lungs and adjoining structures, and the parietal pleura, which is attached to the chest wall. The pleural cavity is the \"potential\" space between these closely apposed layers and is normally filled with a small amount of pleural fluid, which allows for normal lung sliding during respiration. In normal circumstances, negative pressure prevents air from entering the pleural space.\nA pneumothorax occurs when air infiltrates the pleural cavity, either as a result of traumatic injury to the chest wall or spontaneously (spontaneous pneumothorax is historically believed to be caused by the rupture of pleural blebs). Although there are many risk factors that predispose patients to the development of a pneumothorax, most patients presenting to the ED have pneumothorax secondary to trauma.\nA particularly dangerous complication, the dreaded tension pneumothorax, can develop when an injury to the lung parenchyma or bronchus acts as a 1-way valve, allowing air to enter the pleural cavity but preventing it from escaping. A tension pneumothorax can develop rapidly and is greatly exacerbated by positive-pressure ventilation, posing a great danger to intubated patients. For all of these reasons, rapid detection of pneumothoraces in trauma patients is critical, and bedside ultrasonography is a fast, reliable means of accomplishing this task.\nThe following considerations should be kept in mind in the performance of the procedure (see Technique):\nSmall pneumothoraces tend to show the lung point in the anterior chest, whereas larger pneumothoraces have their transition areas on the lateral chest [19]\nSubcutaneous emphysema and pleural effusions may obscure visualization, and patients with these conditions should be examined with thoracic CT whenever possible\nIn intubated patients, the lack of pleural sliding and the absence of comet-tail artifacts do not always indicate a pneumothorax; mainstem intubation and poor ventilation should be considered in the differential (with mainstem intubation, most frequently on the right side, the other lung collapses completely, so that no lung sliding will be seen on the collapsed side)\nIt is often helpful to compare the 2 sides of the chest to each other; however, pneumothoraces may also occur bilaterally\nExpected outcomes\nThe use of ultrasonography to detect pneumothoraces was first described in 1987. [20] Since then, numerous studies have been published describing this application of ultrasonography and documenting its significantly better sensitivity and specificity in comparison with chest radiography. [21, 22, 23] According to the review by the ILC-LUS, lung ultrasound may be more effective at ruling out pneumothorax than ruling in the diagnosis, as compared to supine anterior chest radiography. [17] Although ultrasonography is widely used in emergency and critical care settings for rapid diagnosis of potentially life-threatening conditions, its utility and reliability remain controversial among some specialists. [24]\nIn a 2009 analysis of all published papers on the topic, the overall sensitivity of transthoracic ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax ranged from 58.9% to 100%, and the specificity ranged from 94% to 100%. [21] A standardized technique for performing the procedure and specific sonographic signs indicating a pneumothorax have been described and validated in the literature, and these have been incorporated into the core curriculum in emergency medicine. [25]\nA portable ultrasound machine with a high-frequency (5-10 MHz) linear probe is typically used. A curvilinear, low-frequency probe (2-5 MHz) is employed by some sonographers; although it is more difficult to use accurately, it allows the entire E-FAST examination to be performed without any switching of probes. Most studies evaluating the sensitivity of bedside ultrasonography in detecting pneumothoraces have used high-frequency linear probes, which are the standard recommendation for novice practitioners.\nSedation is typically not required for bedside ultrasonography. The patient should be placed in a supine position (see the image below). If it is clinically necessary, the patient may also be examined while sitting upright, but this positioning may reduce the sensitivity of ultrasonography for detecting small pneumothoraces.\nFor optimal pneumothorax evaluation, patient is examined in supine position.\nUltrasonographic evaluation for pneumothorax\nExamination should begin with the patient in a supine position and at the most superior portion of the chest, which should correspond to the least gravitationally dependent area of the thorax. This is usually in the third or fourth intercostal space in the mid-clavicular line. Although there is no absolute standard, examination of 2 or 3 interspaces is generally recommended for a complete examination. Increasing the number of interspaces evaluated on thoracic ultrasound will increase the sensitivity of the exam. [26]\nThe ribs are identified; these will appear hyperechoic, and their acoustic shadows will appear as hypoechoic rays extending from the ribs. The interspace between the 2 ribs is used as a fixed anatomic landmark during the examination. Next, the pleural line is identified; this is a hyperechoic line found at the inferior border of the space between the 2 ribs.\nUltrasonographic findings suggestive of a pneumothorax have been thoroughly researched and are well described in the literature. [27, 28, 29] The following is a summary of the most routinely used diagnostic signs.\nFindings suggestive of pneumothorax\nThe presence of a pneumothorax is characterized by the following findings: (1) the absence of pleural (lung) sliding; (2) the absence of so-called comet-tail artifacts, also referred to as B-lines; (3) the absence of a lung pulse; and (4) the presence of one or more lung points. [30, 17] The so-called lung point is a somewhat recently described sign that, although difficult to identify, is pathognomonic for a pneumothorax and can be used to measure the size of the pneumothorax.\nAbsence of pleural sliding and lung pulse\nIn normal patients, the pleural line represents both the parietal and visceral layers of the pleura, and back-and-forth sliding of that line is easily visualized during the respiratory cycle. The lung pulse refers to the subtle movement of the visceral upon the parietal pleural along with cardiac beats. [17] In the presence of a pneumothorax, air accumulates between the 2 layers and blocks transmission of sound waves, so that the sliding is not visualized. This phenomenon can be seen in real time in the 2-D mode but is more easily visualized by viewing a still image in M-mode (motion mode; see the video below).\nNormal pleural (lung) sliding, as seen in 2-D mode and M-mode.\nThe appearance of normal lung has been described as the seashore sign (see the first image below). This term refers to the change in appearance between soft tissue and lung, divided by the pleural line, a change resembling that between sand and sea waves. In the presence of a pneumothorax, this demarcation is lost, and the appearance on M-mode imaging is described as the stratosphere sign (see the second image below).\nM-mode ultrasonography showing seashore sign, indicating normal lungs. No pneumothorax exists.\nM-mode ultrasonography showing stratosphere sign, indicating pneumothorax.\nAbsence of comet tails\nComet tails are artifacts that are thought to be created when ultrasound waves bounce off the interface between the apposing visceral and parietal layers of the pleura. They appear as hypoechoic vertical raylike projections off the pleural line and are parallel to the rib shadows previously noted (see the image below).\nComet-tail artifact.\nThe presence of air in the pleural space inhibits the propagation of sound waves, preventing the appearance of comet tails. Comet-tail artifacts may be hard to visualize, requiring considerable patience; the transducer should be kept in a fixed location on the chest as the dynamic lung is observed sliding throughout the expiratory cycle. The presence of comet tails is 60% specific for the absence of pneumothorax. Combined with the absence of lung sliding, the absence of comet tails has a negative predictive value of 100% and a specificity of 96.5%.\nLung point\nThe lung point is a more recently described sign that is pathognomonic for the presence of a pneumothorax. [27] The lung point is the actual point at which the normal lung pattern (ie, lung sliding and comet-tail artifacts) is replaced by a pattern consistent with a pneumothorax (ie, no lung sliding and no comet-tail artifacts).\nThe lung point is a dynamic sign and, like the comet tails, can be visualized only by keeping the transducer in a fixed position and watching the pleura throughout the respiratory cycle. This point should be sought by longitudinally scanning the anterior, lateral, and posterior positions of the chest wall. Although it is the most specific sign of pneumothorax, it is also the hardest to visualize and may require an experienced operator to locate. Finding both transition zones (from normal lung to pneumothorax and then back again) allows calculation of pneumothorax size.\nComplications of Procedure\nBedside ultrasonography for pneumothorax has no complications, aside from incorrect diagnosis of the presence or absence of a pneumothorax without correct identification of associated signs (or the lack thereof). If the ultrasound study is inconclusive, a definitive study with thoracic CT scanning is recommended; this remains the criterion standard for identifying pneumothoraces.\nATLS: Advanced Trauma Life Support. Available at http://www.facs.org/trauma/atls/index.html.\nKendall JL, Hoffenberg SR, Smith RS. History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: the evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Crit Care Med. 2007 May. 35(5 Suppl):S126-30. [Medline].\nZhang M, Liu ZH, Yang JX, Gan JX, Xu SW, You XD, et al. Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma. Crit Care. 2006. 10(4):R112. [Medline]. [Full Text].\nNagarsheth K, Kurek S. Ultrasound detection of pneumothorax compared with chest x-ray and computed tomography scan. Am Surg. 2011 Apr. 77(4):480-4. [Medline].\nSummers SM, Chin EJ, Long BJ, Grisell RD, Knight JG, Grathwohl KW, et al. Computerized Diagnostic Assistant for the Automatic Detection of Pneumothorax on Ultrasound: A Pilot Study. West J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar. 17 (2):209-15. [Medline].\nMowery NT, Gunter OL, Collier BR, Diaz JJ Jr, Haut E, Hildreth A, et al. Practice management guidelines for management of hemothorax and occult pneumothorax. J Trauma. 2011 Feb. 70(2):510-8. [Medline].\nWilkerson RG, Stone MB. Sensitivity of bedside ultrasound and supine anteroposterior chest radiographs for the identification of pneumothorax after blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jan. 17(1):11-7. [Medline].\nSoult MC, Weireter LJ, Britt RC, Collins JN, Novosel TJ, Reed SF, et al. Can routine trauma bay chest x-ray be bypassed with an extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination?. Am Surg. 2015 Apr. 81 (4):336-40. [Medline].\nIanniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B, Miele V. First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Radiol Med. 2014 Sep. 119(9):674-80. [Medline].\nBrook OR, Beck-Razi N, Abadi S, Filatov J, Ilivitzki A, Litmanovich D, et al. Sonographic detection of pneumothorax by radiology residents as part of extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Jun. 28(6):749-55. [Medline].\nZago M. Time for a comprehensive ultrasound-enhanced trauma management. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009. 35(4):339-340. [Full Text].\nRippey JC, Royse AG. Ultrasound in trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Sep. 23(3):343-62. [Medline].\nMatsushima K, Frankel HL. Bedside ultrasound can safely eliminate the need for chest radiographs after central venous catheter placement: CVC sono in the surgical ICU (SICU). J Surg Res. 2010 Sep. 163(1):155-61. [Medline].\nStefanidis K, Dimopoulos S, Nanas S. Basic principles and current applications of lung ultrasonography in the intensive care unit. Respirology. 2011 Feb. 16(2):249-56. [Medline].\nElia F, Ferrari G, Molino P, Aprà F. Lung ultrasound in postprocedural pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jul. 17(7):e81-2. [Medline].\nShostak E, Brylka D, Krepp J, Pua B, Sanders A. Bedside sonography for detection of postprocedure pneumothorax. J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Jun. 32(6):1003-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].\nVolpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr. 38(4):577-91. [Medline].\nQuick JA, Uhlich RM, Ahmad S, Barnes SL, Coughenour JP. In-flight ultrasound identification of pneumothorax. Emerg Radiol. 2016 Feb. 23 (1):3-7. [Medline].\nFocus on: ultrasound detection of traumatic anterior pneumothorax. ACEP.org. Available at http://www.acep.org/publications.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&id=43362&fid=42760&Mo=No&taxid=112591.\nWernecke K, Galanski M, Peters PE, Hansen J. Pneumothorax: evaluation by ultrasound--preliminary results. J Thorac Imaging. 1987 Apr. 2(2):76-8. [Medline].\nAlsalim W, Lewis D. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: Is ultrasound or chest x ray best for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in the emergency department?. Emerg Med J. 2009 Jun. 26(6):434-5. [Medline].\nBlaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S. A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep. 12(9):844-9. [Medline].\nDing W, Shen Y, Yang J, He X, Zhang M. Diagnosis of pneumothorax by radiography and ultrasonography--a meta-analysis. Chest. 2011 May 5. [Medline].\nSmith J. Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST): should its role be reconsidered?. Postgrad Med J. 2010 May. 86(1015):285-91. [Medline].\nAmerican College of Emergency Physicians: Policy Statement: Emergency Ultrasound Guidelines. Available at http://www.acep.org/workarea/downloadasset.aspx?id=32878.\nNoble VE. Think ultrasound when evaluating for pneumothorax. J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Mar. 31(3):501-4. [Medline].\nLichtenstein D, Mezière G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The \"lung point\": an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct. 26(10):1434-40. [Medline].\nStone MB. Ultrasound diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008 Jan. 1(1):19-20. [Medline]. [Full Text].\nBarillari A, Kiuru S. Detection of spontaneous pneumothorax with chest ultrasound in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med. 2010 Jun. 5(3):253-5. [Medline].\nWeingart S. Pneumothorax. EMCrit.org. Available at http://emcrit.org/ultrasound/pneumo.htm.\nRandi Ozaki, MD Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Kings County Hospital Center\nRandi Ozaki, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine Residents' Association\nNinfa Mehta, MD, MPH Clinical Assistant Professor, Ultrasound Fellowship Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center\nNinfa Mehta, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, American Medical Student Association/Foundation, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin\nCaroline R Taylor, MD Associate Professor, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Chief, Diagnostic Imaging Service, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care System\nCaroline R Taylor, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America\nZina Semenovskaya, MD Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center College of Medicine\nencoded search term (Bedside Ultrasonography for Pneumothorax) and Bedside Ultrasonography for Pneumothorax\nA 26-Year-Old Man Who Has Been in a Motor Vehicle Collision\nAtelectasis Imaging\nCardiac Evaluation using Bedside Ultrasonography\nBarotrauma and Mechanical Ventilation\nRespiratory Distress Syndrome Imaging\nPerioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound--Do You Know Best Practices?\nFocused Cardiac Ultrasound in the Pediatric Perioperative Setting\nImaging the Injured Lung: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Use\nFocused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma (FAST): Slideshow\nProcedures Bedside Ultrasonography for Pneumothorax\n2001 /viewarticle/922001\n2002 424547-overview Procedures\nProcedures Pneumothorax\n2001 /viewarticle/899093 Journal Article\nJournal Article Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Inpatient Setting: A Tale of Four Patients"