Datasets:

---

Recag

/

Rp_CommonC_310

Like 0

ERROR: type should be string, got "https://www.vocera.com/gated_access.php/blog/hospital-secure-messaging-7-lessons-learned Skip to main content\nby Sean P. Spina\nDr. Sean Spina is the pharmacy clinical coordinator at Island Health, BC, Canada.\nAs I was going through the metal detector at the airport, I tossed my pager in the bin. The security official looked at me and said, “You work in healthcare, don’t you?”\nI asked, “Why do you say that?”\nShe said, “No one else uses pagers except for people in healthcare.”\nHer comment struck me; I thought, Wow. She is totally right.\nThis seemingly small exchange back in 2008 turned out to be the stimulus that pushed us down the path of transforming the way clinicians and pharmacists communicate at Island Health.\nThe Need: Effective Communication for Quality Care\nAt Island Health, our pharmacists are in both high demand and short supply. It was frustrating for me when a staff pharmacist would page a physician and then have to wait by a landline – a corded phone – for a return call.\nThe pharmacist would always be waiting a long while. This is because physicians are busy, and there was no way for the physician to know the urgency of the page. At some point the pharmacist would turn to a unit clerk or someone else and say, “Hey, when Dr. ABC calls back, can you tell them about this important drug issue we have with this patient.”\nI thought this whole indirect approach to communicating such critical information was inappropriate and could be detrimental to the quality and safety of patient care.\nApplying Scientific Rigor to Solving Communication\nWe set out to study the effect of integrated smartphone communication technology on the efficiency of communication between hospital clinicians. The technology we chose was the Vocera Collaboration Suite application, and our hypothesis was that implementing this technology would improve patient care.\nWe conducted a trial and study, which demonstrated that smartphones reduced the time required for pharmacists to answer drug information questions and improved pharmacists’ confidence and ability to resolve drug therapy problems1.\nI’m a pharmacist. All my training has been in clinical trial design and evaluation. Everything I do in my clinical world is based on literature. All the literature on which I make my therapeutic decisions is based on drug A versus drug B. If I’m going to order drug A, I always ask myself first, what are the benefits and what are the harms of drug A over drug B? It was not obvious to me that this approach was common practice in the technology world.\nI felt there would be a better, longer-standing impact and ability to extend and expand the smartphone program if we were to have objective data behind the implementation and not just say, “We really like it. It feels good.”\nAs we moved into this study, we realized Island Health staff were using a variety of different technologies including personal and corporate smartphones, pagers, and hands-free Vocera Badges. Pagers were becoming obsolete. We also discovered an absence of a master directory of Island Health employees’ mobile devices. This meant that if you called, texted, or paged a physician working with a patient, only your phone number would show up on the physician’s phone’s display. The physician wouldn’t know who was contacting them or the urgency.\nEnlisting Executive Support and Peer Engagement\nThe study was a strong collaboration between Island Health Pharmacy Services and our Information Management and Information Technology (IMIT) department; hospital physicians here in Victoria, Canada; as well as our senior executive with Island Health.\nOur project leads envisioned that collaboration between the clinicians and IMIT would be a key to the success of this project. We secured IMIT endorsement before proceeding, and they delivered intensive support to implement the technology.\nI’m not aware of a collaborative approach where you have pharmacists, physicians, nurses, and switch board operators all working together on a common project to improve patient care. We studied all those people in their real practice settings; we didn’t give them a falsified world, we didn’t give them smartphones to use just for the project. We built the system with the Vocera team to support them in their current practice. For the most part, 98% of the physicians use their own personal smartphones. We wanted to develop a system for their own personal smartphones because that’s what they do in the real world.\nIn order to do a project of this scale, it’s essential to have executive support and buy in. When you look at engaging physicians, it’s essential to have at least one key stakeholder, and we had 10 of them for this relatively small trial. I could go directly to those key stakeholders, who are department leaders. When we had challenges or barriers or issues come up, I could go to them for support.\nTraining, Support, and Physician Engagement\nA couple of Vocera support team members came and trained the research team for a day. After that, our team delivered one-on-one training to users or in group sessions. I used live training video tutorials or modules off my iPhone to show them how to use the Vocera app.\nThe IMIT team and I provided 24/7 support for the trial period. Both IBM and the Vocera team were available to support the project team as needed.\nPhysicians responded quickly and reported experiencing fewer interruptions. I was excited that the overall page turnaround time was statistically faster with Vocera Collaboration Suite.\nI felt it was pretty exciting data: 28% said they agreed or strongly agreed that Vocera Collaboration Suite improves patient care, 31% said they thought it improved patient safety and 38% said they thought it was faster care.2\nThe metric I like most is that 81% of the physicians agreed or strongly agreed that they’d like to continue using Vocera Collaboration Suite.2 That speaks volumes to me because if there are issues, people will just say, “Forget it, I don’t want to deal with it.”\nWhat physicians like most about texting with Vocera Collaboration Suite is that they receive more contextual information to decide whether the activity they are currently engaged in is more important or less important than this new message coming in to them.\nThey also like that there’s no loud beeping. They can discretely look at the information and make a decision in real time. They feel more comfortable because the app transmits information securely.\nNext Steps: Bridging Gaps Between Family Doctors and Hospital Physicians\nWe’re using Vocera Collaboration Suite in our next project, which is in the early pilot phases right now. We’re trying to bridge the gap between family doctors in the community and hospital-based clinicians, as patients transition between the community and the hospital, and from the hospital back to the community. The project will involve 250 to 300 people including physicians, pharmacists and switchboard operators.\nWe’re looking at quality-adjusted work hours for the clinicians. If we can give them back X amount of time in their day through more efficient communication, what does that mean? Is it quality time? Can they do something meaningful with the time? We’ve developed a scale to evaluate if this technology allows clinicians to get back quality meaningful time, as opposed to just a few seconds.\nWe’ve launched the pre-pilot with about 30 people. We’re regularly interacting with them to ask questions like, “How is this working for you? What do you need? Do you need to know this? Do you need to know that?”\nWe’re developing frequently asked questions, we’re going to develop videos, and then we’re going to launch and evaluate how the product performs.\nIntroducing New Technologies – Lessons Learned\nUse formal project protocol: It’s essential to do a formal evaluation with a formal project protocol. Our project improved dramatically by going through a research and ethics board for approval.\nUse scientific rigor: Once the project was underway, we realized we had to tweak our implementation in the ICU. For example, every nurse had their own sign-on. We ended up changing to a generic login for the whole ICU so everybody could communicate together. This underscores the value of scientific rigor; factors you don’t think about come out when you implement using a formal process.\nInvolve key stakeholders: If you expect that you’re going to have barriers or issues arise, it is important to involve and engage key stakeholders so you can rely on them to get through the issues.\nStart small, keep it simple: For the new pilot project we’re working on, we’ve heard loud and clear that we need to keep it simple and look at just a texting solution to get the physicians engaged in the project. Once they’re engaged in the project and comfortable using the technology, we can look at the wealth of other available options.\nChoose intuitive technology, and educate: Teaching and education are essential. People don’t read long documents; having a two minute video to clearly walk them through how to set up and use the app is more user-friendly. I’m a firm believer that an app should be very intuitive, but there are some key things physicians and clinicians and users need to be aware of.\nMeasure, measure, measure: If we make a change during a pilot project, we can really see what it means because we measure it.\nPublish and share: Publish the results in a peer review journal so others can learn from the experience. Welcome opportunities to present your research elsewhere, so others can learn from it.\nTo learn more, watch the Health Employers Association of British Columbia’s video about the project.\nPower JMH, Spina SP, Forbes DA et al. Integration of Smartphones into Clinical Pharmacy Practice: An Evaluation of the Impact on Pharmacists’ Efficiency. Health Policy and Technology 2014; 3: pp 296-305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2014.08.002\nWebb C, Spina SP, Young S. Integrating smartphone communication strategy and technology into clinical practice: A mixed methods research study. Health Policy and Technology 2016; 5: pp 370 - 375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.07.004\nHospital Communication: How Many Apps Does It Take to Make a Phone Call?\nReal-Time Healthcare Analytics: Monitor, Predict, Nudge, Act\nHealthcare Communication: 5 Simplified Workflows, 135 Seconds – Watch"