title stringlengths 5 133 | category stringclasses 6
values | subcategory stringclasses 14
values | venue stringlengths 3 27 | year stringdate 2025-01-01 00:00:00 2026-01-01 00:00:00 | note stringlengths 0 164 | paper_url stringlengths 0 46 | code_url stringlengths 0 60 | dataset_url stringclasses 4
values | project_url stringclasses 3
values | doi_url stringclasses 4
values | other_urls stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization | Failure Taxonomy | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08638 | https://github.com/patronus-ai/trail-benchmark | ||||||
Aegis: Taxonomy and Optimizations for Overcoming Agent-environment Failures in LLM Agents | Failure Taxonomy | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19504 | |||||||
Exploring Autonomous Agents: A Closer Look at Why They Fail When Completing Tasks | Failure Taxonomy | ASE | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13143 | |||||||
Where LLM Agents Fail and How They Can Learn From Failures | Failure Taxonomy | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25370 | https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/AgentDebug | ||||||
Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? | Failure Taxonomy | ICLR Workshop | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13657 | https://github.com/multi-agent-systems-failure-taxonomy/MAST | ||||||
How Do LLMs Fail In Agentic Scenarios? A Qualitative Analysis of Success and Failure Scenarios of Various LLMs in Agentic Simulations | Failure Taxonomy | NeurIPS | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07497 | |||||||
AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories | Failure Taxonomy | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02475 | |||||||
Demystifying the Lifecycle of Failures in Platform-Orchestrated Agentic Workflows | Failure Taxonomy | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23735v2 | |||||||
AgentEval: DAG-Structured Step-Level Evaluation for Agentic Workflows with Error Propagation Tracking | Failure Taxonomy | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23581 | |||||||
Who is Introducing the Failure? Automatically Attributing Failures of Multi-Agent Systems via Spectrum Analysis (FAMAS) | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Pattern Analysis-Based | ESEC/FSE | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13782 | ||||||
Traceability and Accountability in Role-Specialized Multi-Agent LLM Pipelines | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Pattern Analysis-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07614 | https://sites.google.com/view/mas-gain2025/home | |||||
CORRECT: Condensed eRror Recognition via Knowledge Transfer in Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Pattern Analysis-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24088 | ||||||
Scope Delineation Before Localization (SDBL) | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Pattern Analysis-Based | AAAI | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15374 | https://github.com/JarvisPei/SCOPE | |||||
AgentEval: DAG-Structured Step-Level Evaluation for Agentic Workflows with Error Propagation Tracking | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Pattern Analysis-Based | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23581 | ||||||
ProMAS: Proactive Error Forecasting for Multi-Agent Systems Using Markov Transition Dynamics | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Pattern Analysis-Based | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20260 | ||||||
Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | ICML | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00212 | https://github.com/ag2ai/Agents_Failure_Attribution | |||||
Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution (ECHO) | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | NeurIPS | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04886 | ||||||
RAFFLES: Reasoning-based Attribution of Faults for LLM Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | NeurIPS Workshop | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06822 | ||||||
Automatic Failure Attribution and Critical Step Prediction based on Causal Inference (CDC-MAS) | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08682 | ||||||
Abduct, Act, Predict: Scaffolding Causal Inference for Automated Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | NeurIPS | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10401 | https://github.com/ResearAI/A2P | |||||
From Flat Logs to Causal Graphs: Hierarchical Failure Attribution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23701 | ||||||
AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectories | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02475 | ||||||
CodeTracer: Towards Traceable Agent States for Failure Attribution | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11641 | ||||||
ERRORPROBE: Towards Self-Improving Error Diagnosis in Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | LLM Reasoning-Based | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17658 | ||||||
AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems? | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Model Fine-Tuning-Based | ICLR | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03312 | https://github.com/bingreeky/AgenTracer | |||||
GraphTracer: Graph-Guided Failure Tracing in LLM Agents | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Model Fine-Tuning-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10581 | ||||||
Aegis: Automated Error Generation and Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Model Fine-Tuning-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14295 | ||||||
DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Dynamic Runtime-Based | ICLR | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06749 | https://mbjinx.github.io/DoVer_Web/ | |||||
AgentDebug (Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures) | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Dynamic Runtime-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25370 | https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/AgentDebug | |||||
TraceElephant: Seeing the Whole Elephant for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Dynamic Runtime-Based | ACL | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22708 | https://github.com/TraceElephant/TraceElephant | |||||
Demystifying the Lifecycle of Failures in Platform-Orchestrated Agentic Workflows | Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | Dynamic Runtime-Based | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23735v2 | ||||||
Aegis: Taxonomy and Optimizations for Overcoming Agent-Environment Failures in LLM Agents | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Structural and Workflow Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19504 | ||||||
Maestro: Joint Graph & Config Optimization for Reliable AI Agents | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Structural and Workflow Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04642 | ||||||
Failure-Driven Workflow Refinement (CE-Graph) | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Structural and Workflow Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10035 | ||||||
Instruction-Level Weight Shaping (ILWS) | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Structural and Workflow Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00251 | ||||||
SCOPE: Prompt Evolution for Enhancing Agent Effectiveness | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Agent Internal Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15374 | https://github.com/JarvisPei/SCOPE | |||||
AgentDevel: Reframing Self-Evolving LLM Agents as Release Engineering | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Agent Internal Optimization | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04620 | ||||||
ReCreate: Reasoning and Creating Domain Agents Driven by Experience | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Agent Internal Optimization | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11100 | https://github.com/zz-haooo/ReCreate | |||||
SEAlign: Alignment Training for Software Engineering Agent | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Agent Internal Optimization | ICSE | 2026 | |||||||
Trajectory-Informed Memory Generation for Self-Improving Agent Systems | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Agent Internal Optimization | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10600 | ||||||
Trace2Skill: Distill Trajectory-Local Lessons into Transferable Agent Skills | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Agent Internal Optimization | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25158 | ||||||
Improving the Efficiency of LLM Agent Systems through Trajectory Reduction (AgentDiet) | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Runtime and Supervisory Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23586 | ||||||
Stop Wasting Your Tokens: Towards Efficient Runtime Multi-Agent Systems (SUPERVISOR AGENT) | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Runtime and Supervisory Optimization | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26585 | ||||||
Wink: Recovering from Misbehaviors in Coding Agents | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Runtime and Supervisory Optimization | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17037 | ||||||
Process-Centric Analysis of Agentic Software Systems | Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | Runtime and Supervisory Optimization | OOPSLA | 2026 | |||||||
AgentSight: System-Level Observability for AI Agents using eBPF | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | System-Level Monitoring and Passive Diagnosis | Workshop | 2025 | https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3766882.3767169 | https://github.com/eunomia-bpf/agentsight | https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3766882.3767169 | ||||
Taming Uncertainty via Automation: Observing, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Systems | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | System-Level Monitoring and Passive Diagnosis | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11277 | ||||||
AgentDiagnose: An Open Toolkit for Diagnosing LLM Agent Trajectories | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | System-Level Monitoring and Passive Diagnosis | EMNLP | 2025 | https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-demos.15/ | https://github.com/oootttyyy/AgentDiagnose | |||||
Agent Trajectory Explorer: Visualizing and Providing Feedback on Agent Trajectories | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | System-Level Monitoring and Passive Diagnosis | AAAI | 2025 | https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35350 | https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35350 | |||||
Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems (AGDebugger) | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | Interactive Analysis and Active Debugging | CHI | 2025 | https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713581 | https://github.com/microsoft/agdebugger | https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713581 | ||||
XAgen: An Explainability Tool for Identifying and Correcting Failures in Multi-Agent Workflows | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | Interactive Analysis and Active Debugging | CHI | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17896 | ||||||
DiLLS: Interactive Diagnosis of LLM-based Multi-agent Systems via Layered Summary of Agent Behaviors | Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | Interactive Analysis and Active Debugging | CHI | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05446 | ||||||
AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Process and Span-Level Error Localization | arXiv | 2026 | 1,000 tool-augmented agent trajectories with 8,509 human-labeled step annotations for step-level process quality diagnosis. | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.14465 | https://github.com/RUCBM/AgentProcessBench | ||||
CodeTracer / CodeTraceBench: Towards Traceable Agent States | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Process and Span-Level Error Localization | arXiv; Hugging Face Dataset | 2026 | 4,316 coding-agent trajectories with human-verified stage- and step-level annotations for failure localization. | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11641 | https://huggingface.co/datasets/NJU-LINK/CodeTraceBench | ||||
TELBench / DRIFT: Where Do Deep-Research Agents Go Wrong? Span-Level Error Localization in Agent Trajectories | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Process and Span-Level Error Localization | arXiv; Hugging Face Dataset | 2026 | 1,000 expert-verified deep-research trajectories with semantic spans and harmful error-span annotations. | https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02060 | https://github.com/NJU-LINK/DRIFT | https://huggingface.co/datasets/NJU-LINK/TELBench | |||
ContextBench: A Benchmark for Context Retrieval in Coding Agents | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Context Retrieval Benchmarks | arXiv | 2026 | 1,136 issue-resolution tasks across 66 repositories and 8 programming languages, with 4,548 files, 23,116 blocks, and 522,115 lines of human-verified gold contexts. | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05892 | https://github.com/EuniAI/ContextBench | ||||
Who&When | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | ICML | 2025 | 127 trajectories | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00212 | https://github.com/ag2ai/Agents_Failure_Attribution | ||||
TRAIL | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | arXiv | 2025 | 148 trajectories | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08638 | https://github.com/patronus-ai/trail-benchmark | ||||
AgentErrorBench | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | arXiv | 2025 | 200 trajectories | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25370 | https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/AgentDebug | ||||
TraceElephant | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | ACL | 2026 | 220 trajectories, full observability + reproducible environment | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22708 | https://github.com/TraceElephant/TraceElephant | ||||
Demystifying the Lifecycle of Failures in Platform-Orchestrated Agentic Workflows | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | arXiv | 2025 | 307 trajectories, lifecycle-level annotation + repair strategy | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23735v2 | |||||
AgentRx | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | arXiv | 2026 | first unrecoverable failure step annotation | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02475 | |||||
CodeTraceBench | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | arXiv | 2026 | software-engineering agent traces for debugging and patching | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11641 | |||||
MP-Bench | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Real-World Failure Collection | arXiv | 2026 | multi-perspective attribution with failure reason and ideal action annotations | https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25001 | |||||
Aegis | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Synthetic Data via Error Injection | arXiv | 2025 | 9,533 trajectories | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14295 | |||||
CORRECT-Error | Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | Synthetic Data via Error Injection | arXiv | 2025 | 2,000+ trajectories | https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24088 | |||||
Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories | Others and Empirical Studies | ASE | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18824 | |||||||
MAESTRO: Multi-Agent Evaluation Suite for Testing, Reliability, and Observability | Others and Empirical Studies | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00481 | https://github.com/sands-lab/maestro | ||||||
Trajectory Guard — A Lightweight, Sequence-Aware Model for Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Agentic AI | Others and Empirical Studies | AAAI Workshop | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00516 | |||||||
From Features to Actions: Explainability in Traditional and Agentic AI Systems | Others and Empirical Studies | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06841 | https://vectorinstitute.github.io/unified-xai-evaluation-framework/ | ||||||
Signals: Trajectory Sampling and Triage for Agentic Interactions | Others and Empirical Studies | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00356 | |||||||
Beyond Final Code: A Process-Oriented Error Analysis of Software Development Agents in Real-World GitHub Scenarios | Others and Empirical Studies | arXiv | 2025 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12374 | |||||||
Beyond Resolution Rates: Behavioral Drivers of Coding Agent Success and Failure | Others and Empirical Studies | arXiv | 2026 | https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02547 |
A Survey for LLM Agent Trajectory Analysis
This dataset repository hosts the survey paper A Survey for LLM Agent Trajectory Analysis: From Failure Attribution to Enhancement and a structured metadata snapshot of the companion paper collection from Awesome-LLM-Agent-Trajectory-Analysis.
The repository is intended for discovery, citation, and lightweight analysis of the literature around LLM agent trajectory analysis, including failure attribution, trajectory-based debugging, repair, optimization, monitoring tools, and benchmarks.
Note: this is a paper and literature-metadata repository. It is not a raw LLM-agent trajectory corpus.
Contents
| Path | Description |
|---|---|
LLMAgentTraceAnalysisSurvey.pdf |
The survey paper PDF. |
data/papers.jsonl |
Structured paper/tool/benchmark metadata extracted from the companion awesome-list. |
data/papers.csv |
CSV version of the same metadata for spreadsheet use. |
metadata/awesome_list.md |
Snapshot of the upstream GitHub README used to generate the structured files. |
metadata/paper_collection_summary.json |
Category counts and source metadata for the generated paper list. |
metadata/upstream_LICENSE |
MIT license file from the companion GitHub awesome-list repository. |
assets/cover.png |
Cover image used by the dataset card. |
scripts/build_paper_metadata.py |
Reproducible script for rebuilding data/papers.* from metadata/awesome_list.md. |
Dataset Summary
The survey organizes LLM agent trajectory analysis along five main dimensions:
- Failure Taxonomy
- Failure Attribution
- System Enhancement and Optimization
- Trajectory Monitoring and Analysis Tools
- Datasets and Benchmarks
The survey reports 55 retained papers from 1,652 initially retrieved papers. The structured files in this repository contain 73 classified records because some works appear in multiple taxonomy roles and the benchmark section includes dataset/benchmark entries in addition to paper entries.
Data Fields
Each row in data/papers.jsonl and data/papers.csv contains:
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
title |
Paper, tool, dataset, or benchmark title. |
category |
Top-level taxonomy category from the companion awesome-list. |
subcategory |
Fine-grained taxonomy bucket, when available. |
venue |
Venue or source label parsed from the upstream badge text. |
year |
Publication or listing year parsed from the upstream badge text. |
paper_url |
Paper URL, including arXiv, DOI, ACM DL, or ACL Anthology links. |
code_url |
GitHub repository URL, when listed. |
dataset_url |
Dataset page URL, when listed. |
project_url |
Project or homepage URL, when listed. |
doi_url |
DOI URL, when available. |
other_urls |
Additional URLs that do not fit the fields above. |
note |
Short note from the upstream list, commonly benchmark size or annotation detail. |
Category Counts
| Category | Records |
|---|---|
| Failure Taxonomy | 9 |
| Failure Attribution Methods for LLM Agents | 22 |
| Enhancement, Optimization, and Repair | 14 |
| Trajectory Monitoring, Debugging, and Analysis Tools | 7 |
| Datasets and Benchmarks for Failure Attribution and Repair | 14 |
| Others and Empirical Studies | 7 |
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset(
"RobinChen2001/A-Survey-for-LLM-Agent-Trajectory-Analysis",
"papers",
)
print(ds["train"][0])
You can also use the CSV file directly:
import pandas as pd
papers = pd.read_csv("data/papers.csv")
print(papers.groupby("category").size())
Source
- Companion GitHub repository: IcyFeather233/Awesome-LLM-Agent-Trajectory-Analysis
- Survey PDF in this repository:
LLMAgentTraceAnalysisSurvey.pdf - ResearchGate page: A Survey for LLM Agent Trajectory Analysis: From Failure Attribution to Enhancement
Snapshot prepared on 2026-07-09 from the upstream GitHub repository.
Updating the Metadata
After refreshing metadata/awesome_list.md from the companion GitHub repository, rebuild the structured files with:
python3 scripts/build_paper_metadata.py
This regenerates:
data/papers.jsonldata/papers.csvmetadata/paper_collection_summary.json
Citation
@article{wang2026surveytrajectory,
title={A Survey for LLM Agent Trajectory Analysis: From Failure Attribution to Enhancement},
author={Wang, Junjie and Wang, Yawen and Chen, Mengzhuo and Xie, Xiaofei and Chen, Chunyang and Mu, Fangwen and Liu, Zhe and Wang, Qing},
year={2026}
}
Contact
For questions, suggestions, or collaboration opportunities:
- Junjie Wang: junjie@iscas.ac.cn
- Mengzhuo Chen: chenmengzhuo2023@iscas.ac.cn
License
The dataset card metadata declares cc-by-4.0 for this Hugging Face repository. The companion awesome-list repository is released under MIT; its license snapshot is included at metadata/upstream_LICENSE. External papers, code repositories, datasets, and project pages linked from the metadata retain their own licenses.
- Downloads last month
- 246