RuFinQA-CoT / README.md
ArabovMK's picture
Update README.md
6a19679 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.78 kB
metadata
language:
  - ru
license: mit
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K
task_categories:
  - question-answering
  - text-generation
  - table-question-answering
pretty_name: RuFinQA-CoT
tags:
  - russian
  - finance
  - llm-evaluation
  - chain-of-thought
  - benchmarking
  - reasoning
  - cot
  - financial-analysis

🏦 RuFinQA-CoT

RuFinQA-CoT is a Russian benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on financial analysis tasks with Ground-Truth Chain-of-Thought.

πŸ“Š Overview

  • Total questions: 44,627
  • Task types: 7
  • Skills: 12
  • Difficulty levels: 3
  • Version: 3.3.0
  • Language: Russian

🎯 Task Types

Type Count Share Description
factoid 12,255 27.5% Fact extraction from company data
arithmetic 12,021 26.9% Financial metric calculation (ROA, ROE, CR)
multistep 7,799 17.5% Multi-step reasoning
comparison 4,085 9.2% Year-over-year metric comparison
analytical 4,059 9.1% Financial metric interpretation
reasoning 4,052 9.1% Capital structure analysis (leverage)
adversarial 356 0.8% Robustness tests against anomalies

πŸ“ˆ Difficulty Distribution

Level Count Share
hard 16,292 36.5%
medium 16,080 36.0%
easy 12,255 27.5%

πŸ”— Chain-of-Thought Structure

Each question contains annotated reasoning steps:

{
  "reasoning_steps": [
    {
      "step": 1,
      "description": "Extract values from the financial report",
      "intermediate_result": "bal_1600 = 633.696, inc_2400 = 44.691",
      "is_critical": true
    },
    {
      "step": 2,
      "description": "Apply the ROA formula",
      "intermediate_result": "ROA = 44.691 / 633.696",
      "is_critical": true
    },
    {
      "step": 3,
      "description": "Compute the result",
      "intermediate_result": "ROA = 0.0705 (7.05%)",
      "is_critical": true
    }
  ],
  "cot_text": "Step 1: ... β†’ ...\nStep 2: ... β†’ ...\n\nAnswer: ...",
  "final_answer": "ROA = 44.691 / 633.696 = 0.0705 (7.05%)"
}

πŸ“ Data Structure

Each record contains:

Field Type Description
id string Unique question identifier
type string Task type (arithmetic/factoid/...)
skill string Evaluated skill
difficulty string Difficulty level (easy/medium/hard)
question string Question in Russian
context dict Context (TIN, year, financial data)
reasoning_steps list Ground-Truth reasoning steps
cot_text string Textual representation of CoT
final_answer string Final answer
numeric_answer float Numeric answer (for arithmetic)
tolerance float Tolerance for numeric evaluation
evaluation string Evaluation metric type

πŸš€ Usage

Loading the Benchmark

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("arabovs-ai-lab/RuFinQA-CoT", split="train")
print(f"Total questions: {len(dataset)}")
print(dataset[0])

Example Usage for LLM Evaluation

import json
from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("arabovs-ai-lab/RuFinQA-CoT", split="train")

# Filter by task type
arithmetic_tasks = [d for d in dataset if d['type'] == 'arithmetic']
print(f"Arithmetic tasks: {len(arithmetic_tasks)}")

# Sample question
sample = arithmetic_tasks[0]
print(f"Question: {sample['question']}")
print(f"Expected answer: {sample['final_answer']}")
print(f"CoT:\n{sample['cot_text']}")

Model Evaluation

# Simple evaluation example
def evaluate_numeric(prediction: str, ground_truth: float, tolerance: float) -> bool:
    import re
    numbers = [float(x) for x in re.findall(r'-?\d+\.?\d*', prediction)]
    return any(abs(n - ground_truth) <= tolerance for n in numbers)

# Check model output
model_output = "ROA = 0.0705 (7.05%)"
is_correct = evaluate_numeric(model_output, 0.0705, 0.001)
print(f"Answer is correct: {is_correct}")

πŸ€– Evaluated Models

Model evaluations will be added in future releases.

πŸ”¬ Benchmark Features

  1. Ground-Truth CoT: Each question contains annotated reasoning steps with an is_critical flag for critical steps
  2. Stratification: Questions are stratified by type, skill, and difficulty
  3. Metadata: Complete information about version, distribution, and metrics
  4. Multiple evaluation types: cot_numeric, cot_text, cot_exact, cot_keyword, cot_reasoning
  5. Adversarial examples: Robustness tests against negative values and anomalies
  6. Realistic data: Anonymized financial reports of Russian companies

πŸ“š Applications

  • Evaluating LLM reasoning capabilities
  • CoT distillation for financial tasks
  • Model comparison on Russian language
  • Investigating the impact of difficulty on answer quality
  • Testing robustness against anomalous data

πŸ“„ License

MIT

πŸ“š Citation

If you use this dataset in your work, please cite:

@misc{rufinqacot2026,
  author = {Arabov, Mullosharaf K.},
  title = {RuFinQA-CoT: A Russian Financial Benchmark with Ground-Truth Chain-of-Thought for LLM Evaluation},
  year = {2026},
  publisher = {Hugging Face},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/arabovs-ai-lab/RuFinQA-CoT}},
}

πŸ‘€ Author

Mullosharaf K. Arabov
PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor
Department of Data Analysis and Programming Technologies
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

πŸ”— Links


Automatically generated from the RuFinQA-CoT evaluation pipeline.