Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,100 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2293 | Enrique Colmena | Historia de un crimen | 3 | 5 | muchocine | ?History of a crime? revisit the same place, the same episode, if it is true that the tone gives the director Douglas McGrath, is subtly different from that conferred Bennett Miller to?Truman Capote?. | Does not stop being curious the simultaneity of some projects reaching the film at the same time: remember cases high-profile, such as "Les Liaisons dangereuses" and "Valmont", that fantasy to the big screen the drama of Choderlos Laclos, or "1492." "Conquest of paradise" and "Christopher Columbus." "The discovery", who put on images at the same time the Columbian adventure. "Now returns to happen: little more than one year ago was released in Spain"Truman Capote"(see criticism in Criticalia), excellent approach to the life stage of the exquisite writer in which a quadruple murder in Kansas he subjugated to such an extent that, written his masterpiece"A blood cold", on the immortal story, never again he returned to writing anything new.""Historia de un crimen" revisit the same place, the same episode, while it is true that the tone gives the director Douglas McGrath, is subtly different from that conferred Bennett Miller to "Truman Capote": here the relationship between the writer and the murderer Perry reaches levels of physical intimacy that other film hardly aimedproving to be more evident the link previously suggested than anything else. Greater emphasis on the relationship of friendship, is also at times almost of hatred between Capote and writer Harper Lee, author of "To kill a Mockingbird", and the melifluo approach that forced Truman to reach the head of police in charge of the case and the village society of Kansas. It would be unfair to compare both versions, because the two are valuable and provide stimulating insights into the life and work of Capote, especially on that period of its existence, which literally changed life. In this case the director chooses to include fragments of alleged interviews with those people (performed by the corresponding actors) who knew him well, with which adheres to the concept of mixture of fiction and non-fiction which was the germ of the novel "in cold blood". It is true that Toby Jones, the actor who incarnates to Capote, opts for an interpretation of the writer less affected that which masterfully conducted Philip Seymour Hoffman in the other film, but both performances are excellent, without that it fit to censor his compositions. Yes it is true that, in this case, the distribution is extraordinary: appears as notable people such as Sigourney Weaver, Isabella Rossellini, Gwyneth Paltrow (this one in a slashing the cameo role), director Peter Bogdanovich (which recently makes more movies as an actor than as a filmmaker) and Sandra Bullock (which seems to have wisely reconducido his career since its inception ñoños more substantial characters)Jeff Daniels and Daniel Craig (so far from his character James Bond in "007 Casino Royale"). |
1,101 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1807 | Alex Largo | Laura | 5 | 5 | muchocine | I don't know who is the director. I do not know who are the actors. I do not know who are the writers. The only thing I can do to motivate them to see her is tell you more they wanted many now have the genius of days gone by, because if something makes gala the tape of his genius. | I saw Laura because they provided. I saw Laura boredom. I saw Laura without enthusiasm. I saw Laura without wanting to. I saw Laura. And after seeing Laura, only say would buy me on DVD, which removes boredom, you are excited, and that could see a thousand times.Let's go by parts. I don't know who is the director. I do not know who are the actors. I do not know who are the writers. I do not know who composed the soundtrack. Sorry for my ignorance. But the truth, do not think it necessary to enjoy this film.The truth: give me some laziness talk about this film. In addition, the note I gave speaks for itself. And I think that he says. pebbles I hear. said... IT IS A PELICULÓN.And is a peliculón at all (I said all) aspects. Direction, script, actors. All. The most admirable of the film is that (as almost all the great films of history) it has not lost its strength. What is more, it keeps it intact. And hit me with that force. I am not going to disclose nothing of the argument, but I hope that they see.The only thing I can do to motivate them to see her is tell you more they wanted many now have the genius of days gone by, because if something makes gala the tape of his genius. A genius that knows how to deal with the viewer and as shredding the history so that the end is exciting. And together, to make the film the seed on their own merits. |
1,102 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3582 | Jokin García | La habitacion de Fermat | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A Cube to the Spanish who not excited to the viewer but not sleep. | Pierre de Fermat was a French important mathematician of the 17TH century whose enigma was his last theorem, one of the most important in the history of mathematics. Furthermore, it is also the pennant of insert of this film, in which 4 brilliant minds are invited to a party that will have to solve a puzzle, and once there they realize that everything is a mortal trap, a sinister game in which the rules are clear: if they do not solve the enigmas which they are posing in the established time will die. Inevitable to remember other films such as Cube or Saw.Los protagonists of this film are Alejo Sauras (Los Serrano), who find it funny, used to seeing him as the surly son of Sunia, see here make genius of mathematics; Santi Millán (7 lives), Elena Ballesteros (Mata family), who already coincide with Alejo Sauras in "coffee alone, or with them", Lluis Homar (Borgia) and Frederick Luppi.La film can be seen, and its development is interesting, although sometimes it is a little tontorrona and the puzzles are too simplistic. Okay to allow the viewer play to find them, it seems that it is what it is, but as the characters mathematical geniuses, not very credible is that cost them so much discover them (okay, it may be argued that with the pressure no one thinks clearly) as a little silly is the enigma that allows the characters to "qualify" for the game (although this)(, also is true, that acquires a little sense to disclose the truth) at times gives the impression that her could have worked a little more, especially some mathematical topics and some detail thing fuck in hairs, the typical syndrome of "master plan of the evil in which if you fail a single piece is everything goes to the guano" now let's see if you hath been able to discover the enigma which provides access to the do deadly room, putting the number following (no seáis cheats and not look at the comments before know the answer) 5, 4, 2, 9, 8, 6, 7,? And tip it another: 2, 10, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19,? |
1,103 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/75 | Reinderdot | Truman Capote | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Hoffman will accomplish with this film the respect it deserves | A major portion of the blogosphere, is strongly seduced by what is called "New journalism". So when a film about Truman Capote starring jumps into the ring by the? so far, I think - underestimated Philip Seymour Hoffman, the least can do you is a short post.I think that Hoffman will succeed with this film the respect it deserves. "Capote" is not a comprehensive and historical biography of the intelligent, sarcastic and effeminate journalist, but an intense approach to a key moment in his life: the development of "In Cold Blood", last book of Capote (and subsequent film with Robert Blake's protagonist) and first piece framed in the genre "not fictional novel" that opened the door to the "new journalism" and/or "Gonzo journalism".This film is entirely of Philip Seymour Hoffman. Achieve what Nicholson in "About Schmidt", a total retinal detachment of your "real" image of actor and a total embodiment in the character. Not only the acute voice makes credible and the characteristic gestures, basic and key aspects of the character, but through their looks, gestures, reactions and intonations, manages to condense in less than two hours that the script could not do voluntarily. He did lack to see map of Capote's childhood, when he tells them in one of the most intimate moments of the film. If the film wanted to show to Capote, it has achieved, without specifically show all aspects of his life. Bennett Miller (director), Dan Futterman (script) based on the book by Gerald Clark have achieved, through Hoffman, outline its personality, life and work.Hoffman is also supported in other good and sober performances (Catherine Keener as writer Harper Lee, Clifton Collins Jr. as the convict Perry Smith and Chris Cooper as the detective Alvin Dewey, among others) "Capote" makes us make us the same question that has not been able to be answered in reality: were the events around the development of "In Cold Blood" which led the writer to its self-destruction through alcoholism? Considering that the writer in question is Truman Capote, this question makes this film an interesting audio-visual option. This option of the type that they reverberate and conclude in the search for other books, articles, reviews and film, to extend the original film beyond its footage. |
1,104 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/862 | Pablo López | Superman returns | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Technically it is a virguería, which no lapses in no time, but with one of the great pillars seriously damaged, that of the script. | The film itself is a fat churrete, history is more simplistic, flat, stupid, repetitive and inconsistent that we have seen in superhero movies (already alone tend to have some of these aspects), places emphasis on data that is more than spare sobreentienden and then left in the dark, or gives to know others that are not so obvious. The cast is correct. and point. Routh is Reeve or Spacey is Hackman, that to begin with, but to follow, it seems that the protagonist had always in mind 'get along' with the public doing a performance trying to resemble Christopher Reeve. Spacey is magnificent, and the role comes to or painted, but I think that it is somewhat untapped, has a couple of little scenes that really convinced me 100%.In the technical section should be noted above all gotten things and have the glorious and magnificent direction of Bryan Singer which gives the movie a perfect rhythm, a few action scenes (few) fantastic and wonderful images (perhaps with an excess of flat beams which to me I love them), certainly the best of the film. The picture is very good, with some really stunning pictures and more in IMAX. and more in 3D! and Ottman out quite graceful hard comparison test with the maestro Williams, creating a very good score for the footage.In short, a film which is technically a virguería, that no lapses in no time, but with one of the great pillars seriously damaged, that of the script, tedious, repetitive and simple until exhaustion. That Yes, entertaining is a long time. |
1,105 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1178 | Elena Suárez | Bobby | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Nominated for two as best film and best original song Golden Globes, finally there was none; something that even I can not ented, above all, in the first case that was Babel which won the award for best dramatic film. | Surely everyone could talk fluently about the figure of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, however, it is possible that we had more doubts if we were to do the same with his younger brother: Robert Francis Fitzgerald Kennedy.No worry, if them has been curious to learn more about this historical figure, can count on the invaluable help of twenty-two fictional characters that we presenterán Bobby in a subtle and intelligent way. Not us they become bored with a biography full of data and hieroglyphics; their own lives, their ideas and feelings IFF environment the message that the aspiring President released to the American public.This is, without a doubt, the greatest success of the film: reach the depths of an individual, what really is his being, his ideas and feelings but, in addition, this transmitted through the intimate stories of a group of people that match for various reasons in the Ambassador hotel. And do not believe that they are distant stories: love, infidelity, youth, old age, aspirations, disappointments; the good and bad of life with a common goal: have moments of happiness.Spectacular cast into perspective and acting was not disappointed anyone, all and I repeat, all, are exquisite. That certainly helps them a solid script which has been seasoned with witty dialogues that will make us enjoy 120 minutes in which we can observe the political changes that occurred in American Society of the 1960s. All this will be done in a way that is agile, leaving behind unnecessary, friends barroquismos always lack of creativity. Maybe - and this is a very personal note which does not reach the category of criticism - I had shortened the final speech of Robert Kennedy and, thus, would have been a more concise result.Nominated for two as best film and best original song Golden Globes, finally there was none; something that still can not ented, above all, in the first case that was Babel which won the award for best film drama, this last being a clear example of how to tell a story about feelings of how chaotic and Kafkaesque, something of which, fortunately, flees Bobby. |
1,106 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2401 | Alex Largo | La maldición de la flor dorada | 4 | 5 | muchocine | In general a film of high quality with a good story with a mise en scène that removes the hiccups and excellent work by Zhang after the cameras. | When I saw "The curse of the Golden Flower" did not know nor in passing its Director. All knew the film was that it had the participation of Gong Li, Chow Yun Fat, who had held a nomination for the Oscars for best costume and the criticism were divided into two groups: very good and which branded it of desilusionante.For this reason, when I started to see it, my expectations were very few.And precisely for this reason, as the film unfolded, my expectations were crushed by a monster with a speed that left me nailed on the site.And it is that the film has a solid script (which not outstanding), a remarkable work by the director, a few actors who eat the screen with a staging more spectacular (and without digital effects).Let's go by parts.As I said, the work of Yimou Zhang (director) is magnificent and full of enthusiasm (the scene of the guard of the emperor with the strings in the cliff is spectacular), something that is appreciated, that Zhang demonstrates very good taste when it comes to shooting the action scenes. Action scenes than ever are treacly or exaggerated, simply. fine. And it seems rather than fight the characters dance. With highly dangerous sharp objects, but it seems that they dance, that is such harmony of movements that you can not more than stay enthralled watching as they make those impossible stunts with amazing style and grace.The script is good, but not outstanding. The film is based more in the implementation stage and in history to note that in the script. The cast looks extremely good, although they are not her best roles show that they are a few immense players. Especially the two who head the cast, Gong Li (to which we saw not from "Corruption in Miami" and made a magnificent "Memoirs of a Geisha" role) and Chow Yun-Fat (which saw recently with teeth very dirty on a ship in the seas of the Caribbean). Both are very credible and correct action and are perhaps the two actors and two characters who Excel more in history.In the technical field stands out in two areas: in the locker room (amazing) and the (immense) sets. Both shows the hand of the director, which demonstrates a great MIME as regards the Mise en scène, as evidenced in "The House of the Flying Daggers".The soundtrack, although elite and correct, clashes occasionally and can be somewhat pompous.In general a film of high quality with a good story with a mise en scène that removes the hiccups and excellent work by Zhang after the cameras. |
1,107 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1511 | Javier Saz | The host | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Joon - ho Bong returns to mix genres with his characteristic humor, and create a monster very very enjoyable but somewhat unbalanced in its second half. | Thanks to MuchoCine.net see a morning pass "The Host" (?)(Do Gwoemul?, 2006) from Joon-ho Bong with very high expectations after his excellent "Memories of Murder" (2003), unusual mixture of detective story, comedy and sociological portrait. Here change the environment of the police for the monster-movies. If in "Memories of Murder" the result was notable and original (although I see some downturn in his long second Act) in "The Host" part find me too irregular. I will explain.The film begins with a great sequence of twenty minutes (excluding the flashback of do scientists?), the first act of the story, surpassing the achievements of any monster-movie self-respecting (except the "Them!", (1954, Gordon Douglas)). But under the guise of monster movie Bong Joon-ho is dedicated to your personal look about the characters and their environment. A ruthless and hilarious look. Do comedy, drama, action and complaint? This personal way of narrating works it in the first half of the film, but after a crucial event in the middle of the film, the balance between comedy and drama are descompensa and unnecessarily lengthens the plot (perhaps Pantry you twenty minutes of their two hours), and although in the outcome he dates the flight, let me a bittersweet taste in relation to the first hour of film.The presence of the monster is really purely circumstantial (monster movie) and it serves to Joon - ho Bong to show us the way (change) run through the characters after the key at the end of the first act event, the search undertaken is hampered by the environment in which they live. Joon-ho Bong ridiculed and denounced to the estates of his country, to health care, the Government, the army, the media and American interventionism.Visually brilliant, his narration is more visual verbal (the best gags are Visual) and achieves very plastic images (as his already recurring overhead slowed down with rain), albeit sometimes somewhat repetitive.Joon - ho Bong returns to mix genres with his characteristic humor, and create a monster very very enjoyable but somewhat unbalanced in its second half. (3 +) |
1,108 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3977 | Oscar Martínez | Alien vs Predator 2 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Terríblemente fun for fans and quite superior to its predecessor. That Yes, or soñéis to find something similar to the original movies. | Directed by Colin and Greg Strause special effects technicians, and starring John Ortiz, Steven Pasquale, Johnny Lewis, Reiko Aylesworth, David Paetkau and Chelah Horsdal among others, Aliens vs. Predator 2: requiem, is the second movie facing the two mythical alien creatures of the Fox.Cuando a ship Explorer Predator crashes, appears in a Colorado town. The Aliens on board escape and kill all the Predators except one. The last surviving Predator must now end with all the Aliens, as well as the terrifying Predalien who was begotten in the previous installment. Meanwhile, the inhabitants of the village are being needlessly trapped in the middle of the last confrontation between these two mythical creatures.As a faithful follower of the series and sickly collector of McFarlane Toys of the initiated sagas by Ridley Scott and John McTiernan, I have followed the development of this sequel with considerable interest from its origins, despite the weak outcome of previous delivery. One of the things that most called the attention of such production was the claim by managers that the film was going to be a tribute to the entire saga, from four at Depredador.Y 2 Alien movies go if it is.Objectively speaking, as film Aliens vs. Predator: requiem leaves much to be desired, especially if we compare it with great versions of Scott, Cameron and McTiernan (and Fincher, although reniege it himself), but as a staunch follower of both creatures, have to say that this second installment is terribly funny, bloody and, above all, full of winks. Finally, say winks is little, since it could ensure that its plot is built based on Parallels and tributes to the previous installments and will still say more, when Aliens vs Predator 2: requiem ceases to do so, quite lost.With blatantly archetypal characters, the Strause brothers leave us well clear from the outset who are true stars: the film starts immediately after the events in Aliens vs. Predator, when the alien inoculated in one of the predators completed its gestation process forcing the rest of the crew to return to Earth.A from there, and after giving us for the first time the planet Predator, starts the succession of tributes: a death (plane by plane) identical to the of Harry Dean Stanton in Alien, an ambush similar to the one suffered by the colonial marines in Aliens: the return (tank included) or a sort of Ripley trying to get safely to their particular Newta flat first also identical to the one of Ripley and the Alien of Fincher, the aquatic Alien by Jeunet, the discovery of a corpse scraped with a movement of also identical to the predator camera or another camera movement also identical to the opening credits of Predator 2, which gets the jungle to the citynot to mention the room trophies displayed at the end of that same second installment, are just a few examples of an infinite list.On the other hand, one must recognize that the special effects are very worked, while accused a too dark, and the prealien laugh quite less than the mutation also report that Jeunet released the manga in Alien Resurrection, in the film with more deaths per minute of the saga.Terríblemente fun for fans and quite superior to its predecessor. That Yes, or soñéis to find something similar to the original movies. |
1,109 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/352 | Bloody Will | Maleficio | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It will happen to the story as the film terror of the 2006, but with so much crappy Exorcist come less and nonsensical remakes, is appreciated more than consistent argument. | First before, pure lie and lasts of the TV spot that promotes the premiere, a hoax blatant to the Viewer. So that in 1818 not be what a curse, and is repeated in the present is the furthest of the essence of the film. The film is set in 1818, so you do not fall into my error: wait and see when it starts to happen the same in the current era, because it takes 50 seconds, as much of the footage.That said with the slap to the distributor already I can say one thing, would "The prophecy" of 2006 have maintained the tension as does "El Maleficio". Remove you a thing of the mind, this film is not "The Exorcist", or "The prophecy". You will not see heads turning nor possessed assassins. The girl running through the Woods on the announcement seems "Texas Chainsaw Massacre", and that, nothing at all. In this film the holder body goes beyond violating horrible torture in its objectives, and you can discover it as it passes the story and you acercáis at the end.Based on real facts (such as the teleplays of antena3), it tells the story of John Bell (Donald Sutherland) after violating the rules of his Church to the detriment of a neighbor, blame you this both to him and to his hijia. After this curse, the younger, Betsy Bell, will start a real calvary of possession which will bring the head to his mother (Sissy Spacek), brothers, and even a local teacher. But not everything is what it seems, and being evil has a role to play.It is true that the movie is full of clichés. Perhaps the interpretations are not just magnificent, and the use of a Steady-cam as a trick to give life to the spirit of the film is something chabacano. Even so, and as I said before, the tension is maintained effectively during the greater part of the footage. Those films whose surprise unveiled very at the end, is what is appreciated after warmed-over end where, with a prayer and holy water, everything ends.Once notified of the deception that can induce its trailer, get to the idea that it is a film that you hàra hang out, without great special effect and nothing to make a summer blockbuster, so it is a way of escape to both palomitero product.It will happen to the story as the film terror of the 2006, but with so much crappy Exorcist come less and nonsensical remakes, is appreciated more than consistent argument. |
1,110 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/974 | Ibán Manzano | Babel | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Babel is universal, jumps from continents, change language and flies through the air any kind of borders through a visual terrorism which injects oxygen to the image at a time called the libertarian reductionism. | One might think that the third movie Alejandro González Iñarritu is the poorly resolved synthesis worst defects of his previous works, Amores Perros and 21 grams greater, or that even Babel is the wound heal a film again cut the butterfly effect that leads to the more exasperated limits of their own realityunder the excuse of a world globalized, interconnected to the force and definitely disoriented. In fact it would be easy to assume that the Gallery of alien suffering vignettes that make up Babel follows the logic of a whimsical script which explores the border last as possible, instead of responding to the probable.But what separates Babel of films, including Crash, which shares form and Fund (the fear in our days), is that his manipulative collection of coincidences finally responds to a plurality of responses, pronounced in a multitude of languages alive (and killed), for a number of quasi-infinity of cultures; Meanwhile, that for its part, of Haggish devenía in sole and simplistic response under the illusive mirage of that same plurality in their interrelated stories. The director of Amores Perros has shot the climax to a trilogy about the pain marked by rewriting in modern key of Greek tragedy through the fractured narrative with Babel. But his latest work has a fundamental difference with the previous two, is not out of necessity but by vocation polyglot, i.e. that despite the torture that took their characters is deeply hopeful.Babel is universal, jumps from continents, change language and flies through the air any kind of borders through a visual terrorism which injects oxygen to the image at a time called the libertarian reductionism. His stark story joins the vital adventures of his characters in a point of multiple readings and many more directions under an inviolable axiom: the only way to escape that which we call fear, is through love and true pain. Something shared by all cultures speak the language they speak. |
1,111 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1036 | Ramón Balcells | El laberinto del fauno | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Film wonder can be, without doubt, or perhaps with Cuarón and Scorsese, one of the best films of the year. Do not hesitate to see it, maravillará them. | Just in the last year saw the first film of the, by then unknown, Mexican director Guillermo del Toro. Cronos was entitled, and was directed by the great actor Frederico Luppi. A film was beautiful, very poetic, and at the same time tragic and unpleasant. After several failures (all of them in Hollywood), the director signed his best film, El laberinto del Fauno, which describe her more or less as the previous.The tape blends perfectly the reality and fantasy. And is that it is situated in the Spanish war post, focusing on the life of Ofelia, a young girl whose mother is pregnant with Captain Vidal, his stepfather. When Carmen, the mother, being about to have the child, decides to go with her daughter to the village where her husband, so that your future child is born with it. Once there, in the middle of the guerrillas among the vestiges of Republican resistance and army captain, will create a nasty, cold and tense atmosphere for Ophelia. And one day, looking for the forest, discovers a labyrinth inhabited by a Faun who reveals a secret: she is actually a Princess, last of his lineage, which yours have long waiting. In order to return to the Magic Kingdom, the girl must face three tests will be gradually overcome. But the evidence will not be so easy for Ophelia, as it will not only have to use his intelligence (and the help of the book given to him by del fauno), but will also have to sacrifice their lives. Meanwhile, at the mill where Vidal has located its center of operations will occur parallel stories of Ophelia, as Mercedes, the housekeeper of the captain, that apparently meets everything that he sends.El laberinto del fauno is not (as you say) the Alice of Wonderland in Spanish, but a totally symbolic and poetic tale with real scenes of terror. What Guillermo del Toro wants to tell us, and here's the message of the film is as follows: reality is imposed before the fiction. It is a moral, if so you could say, terrible, but incredibly original if you know treat well. And here's the Bull is exceeded, in creativity. Each sequence has a meaning, real or imaginary, each has its beginning and its end, each scene shows his side more dark and bright at the same time. To represent this parallel (the fiction and reality), and placing us in the post war Spanish, excellent director of Photography Guillermo Navarro has opted to add dark shades and gray to the scenes where it appears the real world and the fact that the imaginary are really distressing and not very pleasant, leaving no band has added more picturesque in these colors. Attentive to the banquet scene, because there, all the colors are very own Mexicans (red, Orange, blue and yellow). And also look at the shades gives them night and day. In the first, are all more blue and orange, and in the second, green and grey. But first and foremost, it is a film overly (while not bad) dark. We, like all of the director. The film is sensitive and at the same time difficult, issues such as post war, death, the satisfaction of one's own, the imagination of a young girl and evil itself. And it is that few Directors are as William, and thus have their own style to have these issues. It is really difficult to play so many at the same time and that is you a tape like this, perfect, balanced, with sense. For their high quality, hope to win the Oscar to which chooses (best film estrangera). Altogether, the laberinto del fauno is unforgettable, either by his overflowing creativity and imagination by his talented and impeccable management. The incredible cast, does not include two or three, if not all. Both Sergi López (Vidal), the best role of her career, full of evil; Maribel Verdú, an actress that I never liked so far, shows, apart from having style acting, you do great (tuned to the forest scene); Doug Jones, playing one of the most difficult film roles masterfully, the Faun; Ariadna Gil, which we barely see it little (but more than Frederico Luppi, which appears exactly 5 seconds), but we enjoy her beautiful voice; Alex Angulo, that great actor that has a face of doctor; Roger Casamajor, as the brother of Mercedes (Verdú), in a wonderful role; and finally, the rookie (in starring roles) Ivana Baquero, a real prodigy girl that would give the same Goya. In short, as you can see, del Toro is has surrounded by the very best of the Spanish interpretation.Finally say that this wonderful film may be, without a doubt, or perhaps with Cuarón and Scorsese, one of the best films of the year. Do not hesitate to see it, maravillará them. |
1,112 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/132 | Tito Chinchan | Ice age 2 el deshielo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | I laughed much, I am excited and I've bored nothing at all | Wow, poor squirrel, how bad that was spent in the first and how bad that paints the second looking at the poster. And I still not explained as not her eaten, since you have to be already desfallecido so many adventures. What you eat? Angelico to penic which gives me (and what me rio, clear).The film is about a peculiar group, comprised of a sloth, a mammoth and a tiger of Sabre-tooths during the thaw. Given that the Valley in which they live will flood soon, all that inhabit begin a pilgrimage towards a supposed barge that will save them from the flood. By the way, mammoth suffers a crisis of loneliness, given that it realizes that he is the last of its species with life. Luckily, three zarigüellas (a large size) intersect in their way. In parallel, a squirrel fights his Acorn all who stand in his way.Well, the movie I loved. I laughed much, I am excited and I've bored nothing at all. All the characters I have loved, and have been removed many things that I liked not to the first. The sloth is very funny, considering his stellar moment and resolviendolo in a great way (especially for kids). Saber-toothed does not have a large role, although it leaves a lesson in overcoming very interesting (a little ñoña, but it is a film for children). And I love the mammoth, but not be well why. But best of all are the secondary characters, such as the zarigüellas or the worshipers of the sloth. Well, I'm lying, the best of the entire film is the story of the squirrel, which is made up of wonder. I'm a fan of her since the first time that I saw, and in this part has a role critical and very long.In short, a very nice movie for kids and you like minded young adults. The trouble is that it has scenes that can be scary to the kids. |
1,113 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/618 | Jesus Lens | El diablo viste de Prada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Delicious comedy made in Hollywood with all the attributes of genre cinema that takes advantage of overwhelming Yankee film machinery to provide an industrial product seamlessly, perfectly finished, wrapped and packaged. | Predictable. Wonderful and joyously predictable, "the Devil Wears Prada" is a delicious comedy film made in Hollywood with all the attributes of genre cinema that takes advantage of overwhelming Yankee film machinery to provide an industrial product seamlessly, perfectly finished, wrapped and packaged.Paradoxically, what I like most about this film is that, in theory, should get me: the Viewer always guess what will happen in the next sequence, and when it actually happens. glad. Because, like a blanket in winter or a fresh beer in the summer, there are things to be timeless, irremovable, indispensable. Like the script of a comedy, not by modern, is less classical.Let us in history: a young intellectual which drink wine and dine in warm bistros with other no less intellectual friends, goes to work as second Assistant a factotum of the publishing world of fashion, a universe that is not only alien, but laughable and, to some extent, negligible.But the ugly duckling, even with all the ballots to a labour barrigazo of órdago, begins to adapt to a universe that was not as stupid as it seemed. or Yes? We have the classic situations humorous that we have seen a thousand times, but so well resolved, with so much grace and freely bandied, that you can not spend the film with a permanent smile on the corner of the mouth. Scathing replicas, comical gaffes of leg, a little bit of love, unrequited love, beauty and style in spades. If mix class and the style of Audrey Hepburn in "breakfast at Tiffany? s" with life chaos of the other Hepburn, Katherine "The beast of my girl" or "Woman of the year", get that Anne Hathaway so special and attractive.And we have, of course, Meryl Streep, a genus in its own right. Streep, who was never what is said a beauty or a beauty, has been able to age better than all her companions generation. While Kathleen Turner drowns their arrobas in alcohol and the grandiose Michelle Pfeifer is missing in combat, Meryl has become a woman of arms taking, wasting class, power, force, vitriol and dressed in Prada, evil, hatred, cruelty, intelligence and, at a time, until your pinch of humanity.We have a film so simple and straightforward in its approach, as hilarious in its resolution. A movie that, without surprise with any display or tour de force story, is as effective as a tartazo full face, a slip in the middle of the street caused by a banana peel or a good slap in time. "The Devil Wears Prada" is a refreshing dive in the classic American comedy that, as we have been insisting can be enjoyed with the joy of a drink of water ice in a summer evening. Nice, tender, and happy. |
1,114 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1179 | Silvia | Hard candy | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film manages to catch the attention of the Viewer without having to resort to special effects, or changes of scenarios and with very few characters. | Desquiciante. Hard Candy is a psychological thriller that tells the story of a revenge. Cruel revenge of a teenager a photographer which considers guilty of sexual harassment. The film speaks about the danger of the network for many children who are subjected to harassment of paedophiles or paedophile. But in this case, the bully who will become prey to his "victim".Hayley and Jeff are known through a chat. Jeff has 30 years and Hayley is only a girl, but that does not preclude that they are to get to know. The title of the tape, Hard Candy (hard candy) is a colloquial term in Internet for underage girls. The meeting at home of photographer mark a turning point in the film after which becomes every a thriller full of psychological sadism whose environment is stifling above all thanks to the brilliant performances of Patrick Wilson and Ellen Page. The sarcastic dialogues? sometimes monologues-which keeps the protagonist with the photographer acting as an engine of the action of the story. It is surprising how the film comes to provoke disgust, malaise, discomfort, perhaps even nausea and all this without that there is not a single plane explicit nor unpleasant. The images suggest more than show, play with the spectator, awaken the panic and terror so it never looks.It's the first film as director David Slade, who has a remarkable experience in the world of advertising and video clips. And that advertising style is noticeable especially in aesthetic approach of the film (very sharp images, close-ups, etc.) The contrast of red colours (of the costumes for the girl) is frequent and the chromatic game between the Red Wall and the blood. In addition, the girl is dressed in a red outfit which hood, but in this case the tale is reversed and Riding Hood which snack to the Wolf. The film manages to catch the attention of the Viewer without having to resort to special effects, or changes of scenarios (practically the entirety of the history unfolds on the floor of the photographer) and with very few characters (most of the footage occupied the couple protagonist). To hook the viewer its greatest asset is the dialogue between the two characters, conversations that keep in suspense to anyone who is following the story.The home perhaps is something forced because the characters are given to know superficially and thriller arises somewhat sharply. But then the pace develops radically more slowly? than not tedious - but managing to keep the viewer in tension in the majority of the footage. A story that plays with the psyche of the Viewer, to make it go really wrong but without seeing a drop of blood more than any scratch. Another point in its favour is that it points to any of the two characters as good or bad. At times we do not know who is more terrifying for us: the teenager with dyes psychopaths or the photographer that entertains photographing naked girls. The film is limited to show us both to make the viewer who judge.The end is somewhat confusing as the justification for acts of the protagonists are not entirely clear. There is a lack of really understandable reasons does not show the protagonists, as Hayley seems to act simply for spite, without that we come to understand their real motivations. While they glimpse some justifications of their ways, it is also true that motives are not entirely credible. But although the story has some shortcomings in terms of likelihood (mature talks of the girl child are more characteristic of a university than a college student), the truth is that this lack of reality does not prevent that the Viewer is immersed in the distressing atmosphere and reach introduced himself in history. |
1,115 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/930 | Calaf | Happy feet | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The end becomes something innocent and utopian, but apart from good jokes, songs and musical numbers already worthwhile by itself alone. That Yes, has one that go with the mind of a child to be able to enjoy it. | One of the Christmas releases with more than likely success. Not in vain at the front is the Australian George Miller, creator and director of "Babe, the brave piglet". While some of you already know my weakness by child animation cinema, being objective, it has history, music, humor. entertain both children and adults. And thanks to the approach of the dance (it is almost a musical) brings something new and old at the same time, the classics of animation.It is not a purely child movie Ice Age style, but that as I have said, the dance is the cornerstone of the same, as element of communication, and against the background of the famous phrase of Chaplin: know yourself and try to be happy, but above all, know yourself. There are things in the story of the ugly duckling of the movie Billy Elliot, Darty Dancing in the dance, but then it was derived to the heroism of the protagonists of these stories, all this with a bit of social criticism in Hispanic communities and differentiating elements.The end becomes something innocent and utopian, but apart from good jokes, songs and musical numbers already worthwhile by itself alone. That Yes, you are one that go with the mind of a child to be able to enjoy, because if not, the nearly two hours more than one it will be long. |
1,116 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2108 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Candy | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Yet another film about the dangers of drugs. Here is portrayed the matter with sincerity, without embellishment. That is appreciated, but as lacks it a pinch of bad milk, acidity. | Love is an addiction and who is destroyed by get it, keep it or deny it. Candy portrays the physical and moral decline of two young people hooked to the heroin.As all predictable, Candy can be seen. Don't need that the script of a surprising return. We know at all times when of physical decadence and moral of the couple are. I'm not surprised see them prostitution or steal. Nor do they break all family ties or that sacrificed the love which seemed sincere and deep by the journey without return of the drug. These films are almost always similar: the bar on the Ribbon of Blake Edwards, days of wine and roses, is very high. Leaving Las Vegas raises a different speech: the destructive vocation.Candy and Dan, the couple from the movie, can't be kids who have discovered a deadly toy too soon. There is even a vision the couple naïve at times. When Dan gives a kind of robbery, there is an inevitable tufo comedy fool. When Candy is prostituted, the hidden camera carnal evidence: only the intuímos. Same goes with Dan when he does. It seems as if director wanted not to be overly coarse: borders the ends and precisely that decision lastra the film towards the asepsis, impiendo us involve something more. Days of wine and roses had strong scenes, but it was supplying with an immeasurable dramatic climax here, unfortunately, is not.The three parties comprising the film (heaven, Earth and hell) could be independent. The director (Neil Armfield) not amused at the expense of the viewer and offers a decent show, honored, written with deep respect, caring for the light and the dialogue, which is not abundant. The reciters in off of the poet Dan are peach in syrup: is could have dispensed of this poetic tone. On the other hand, the painter Candy writes on all the walls of the House in which they exposed and in those texts, future palimpsests of some unrelated to the plot tenants, are beautiful and very decently written. Heath Ledger and Abbie Cornish are not Robert Downey Jr. and Courtney Love, but manage to shake with her willful delivery. Geoffrey Rush as talludito friend, gay and drug addict, makes a fabulous role, but leaves shortly and we are eager to see more. Almost deserves a film he alone. It is not a masterpiece, at all. Not a notable film. It is left wanting for mediocrity, perhaps because the theme is very crushed and needed another way to be counted. This us we know. The andazas of the toxic couple is already enough view. Vicente Aleixandre said it better: "everything is apparently enough not surprised". Then that. |
1,117 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2355 | El mágico | Hostel 2 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Hostel 2 part of a terrifying premise and is only dedicated to enhance most frames that do not contribute much either in originality or create the necessary climate for a film of this kind. | Eli Roth I tell them, I do not think a great director, many critics believe that if didn't by friend Quentin Tarantino, not would be filming movies so often giving his fìlmico background is quite poor in terms of resources. "Hostel" in its first version had a good idea but was badly carried into practice. The idea of thinking in small European hostels where gangs of kidnappers capture people to serve on a platter to cynics and assassins with high purchasing power was chilling and very original. Who was not passed by the head that this could be true? That is the only point in favour of the two productions of Roth: depart from a brutally possible concept. From then on, as the director the weapon, is something else. In principle, this "Hostel 2", three American students in Rome choose a weekend where with one of his bandmates art trip. They are young, adventurous, uninhibited and wanting to try new experiences. The young woman (not named the actors because they are more than illustrious unknown and none has a future in the industry) is also conducting a "exotic getaway" and invites them to accompany her to a place where you can relax and forget the stress of the city. But there you will discover that there is an organization in the shadows is responsible for pricing their lives and provide the physical space for millionaires to navigate to massacre. Film values? Few, blood, a lot! Very, very strong scenes, viewers of weak stomachs, abstain! And a dull, listless, pace that barely reaches logic adrenaline levels when the deaths begin to occur. There are many unnecessary scene (the end, with the theme of football, for example ball) and little capacity to be original in the treatment of resources that the general idea of the story suggests. As I have already said, "Hostel 2" part of a terrifying premise and is only dedicated to enhance most frames that do not contribute much either in originality or create the necessary climate for a film of this kind (the black humor of Roth is weak and poor). To be honest, as an old friend of mine said, is only a film more "to soak the sandwich".I mean I? Loose part and we will wait to improve in the third, they say that the third is the expired not?the seasoned Viewer. |
1,118 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2228 | Ramón Besonias | La noche de los girasoles | 3 | 5 | muchocine | More than correct film. It entertains, worries, and almost unwittingly saddened, we plunge into the void where the characters are installed even after resolving the final drama. | On the contrary of what was happening in the recent forest of shadows, the night of the sunflowers is a drama resolved in an efficient and disturbing (despite its slow pace and little Hollywood) rural thriller where each and every one of the characters are immersed in a suffocating solitude which only the random event in an attempt to rape provided them excuses to release tension that threatens them. A couple stagnant in their relationship; a young man tied to an environment (the people) that he is Guy; a solo villager who refuses to leave his home after death his wife; a terrifying seller, embittered by the life he has had; a civil guard caradura, disgusted by his life of newly married? All are their misery through the tragedy that will be triggered.Without possessing the sense of staging or the expressive force of the landscape which does possess Fargo, the night of the sunflowers follows the path of this priceless portrait that draw the Coens deep America. Where Fargo is a police pregnant with sense of smell to the Sherlock Homes in this Spanish village appears a civil guard about to retire despite no less smell prefers to protect his daughter who enforce the law. And where in Fargo writes a classic script, without temporary fractures, in the film the rookie Sánchez-Cabezudo are a rashomónimo mounting without hurry (to the emotional rhythm of its protagonists) going drawing by subjective layers network events in which all the characters converge.The night of the sunflowers is one film more than correct. It entertains, worries, and almost unwittingly saddened, we plunge into the void where the characters are installed even after resolving the final drama. The scene in which the cavers return to the affected city and silent; This poor father presenting his resignation after silence (and pay) with the dark plan of his son-in-law named; This rapist returning to his home (as usual), delivered to the sisífica existence of sofa and TV. Or dramatic resignation of this son-in-law cloistered in his family prison. All of them make this film a thriller (one of the fear, that we say in Castilian) or police (civil guards in this case), almost desperate, sad drama about loneliness and its miseries.With the game on chance that vertebra the proposal for the Coens, never aimed to melancholy or existential drama, Sánchez-Cabezudo work does not play, and if we no or entertains. But it risks, coming out of the mere dialectical policía-asesino with a happy ending (so the Hollywood style) and opting for letting the Viewer without crutches that only interpret what is mere survival against loneliness.Still concerned see Manuel Morón (the father of the ball) of bad, very bad. Carmelo Gomez will of pearls that bland role as pusillanimous bursting of anger. The unknown Judith Diakhate is beautiful and accurate (in that order). Celso Bugallo keeps shrinking me with another natural but intense interpretation (as already did in Mar adentro). Also great Vicente Romero (recommended in the role of the Maquea in the TV movie father courage) and Walter Vidarte, a loco that the spectator soon consistent. |
1,119 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3704 | Andrés | Bésame tonto | 4 | 5 | muchocine | With their particular humor Wilder plays with two antagonistic Archetypes of male imagery: the wife and the bitch. | The relationship between husbands and wives is once again the focus of another notable comedy that many described as immoral. It was not for less, with their particular humor Wilder played with two antagonistic Archetypes of male imagery: the wife and the bitch. In order to ingratiate himself with the famous singer Dino (Dean Martin), the piano teacher Orville contractual prostitute Polly (Kim Novak), makes passing through his wife and delivery to your guest, waiting to be affected positively with the purchase of his songs. Meanwhile, Felicia, the wife, expelled from his home on pretexts, sticking a drunk at the bar rake "The navel" and ends up sleeping in the trailer of Polly, giving rise to a fun confusion of roles. |
1,120 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1295 | Vsancha | Rocky Balboa | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It is impossible not to enjoy with this movie those who pequeñazos we enjoying every bite of the Italian Colt. A loving and exciting tribute to a living myth. | Nobody, absolutely nobody, gave a hard by this Rocky; No one believed that Stallone was able to return to the series than were their first deliveries, as nobody gave a hard because Rocky plantase face in his final match; but Stallone has done, has created a product to the height of what was at the time the saga. It is a grand finale to a saga which did not deserve to end at Rocky V.Es impossible not to enjoy with this movie those who pequeñazos we enjoying every bite of the Italian Colt. "Rocky Balboa" is a nostalgic view of the myth, perhaps occasionally too steeped in nostalgia, but are their defects also part of their virtues; We see a Rocky full of ghosts of the past, more sore by the blows of life than by the quadrilateral, which only remain memories of a most brilliant past and a handful of anecdotes to tell customers of his bar. It is a continuous return to the past, a tribute to Rocky and the own Stallone, a beautiful and sometimes tontorrona but very honest reflection on the old glories and the passage of time.Commendable work of Stallone with this film. It could have been confined to sell us a match of an old Rocky and problems with drugs, with the famosote of turn; but his love for the character were prevented from and had to give it a fitting end to the saga. Perhaps as more negative point of the tape is that the rival lacks charisma and no falls short, but gives equal, because the absolute protagonist of this film is Rocky. It is definitely exciting and loving tribute to a living myth. |
1,121 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4102 | Renegado | Alien vs Predator 2 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film which happens to be a poor excuse to again confront two legendary characters from the science fiction film. Little and nothing of what is intended and expected in a job that does not do justice to the tradition of the respective sagas. | I must confess that you as a fan of comic books and stuff, crossovers (for those who don't know that it is, is when you agarrás two main characters Gros and do them interact in a same story) I love, I always enthusiastic and any of them is brought to the big screen will insurance with my presence.Unfortunately, as often happens, most of the time projects fail to be commensurate with the expectations they generate, and you end up going half disappointed and somewhat hot cinema.With this installment of the series happens something more or less like this. Both Alien and predator are two icons of science fiction film; two real "monsters" in the literal sense as in the metaphorical sense of the word, so it a confrontation between the two is supposed, obviously, be something spectacular.Their first meeting, in the first "AvP", did not seem all bad, but I remember that I felt the feeling that history could have been much more.The idea of an underground Temple in Antarctica, in which predators bred Aliens for use as training, found me something quite well thought of as a way to deal with both creatures, and a terrestrial scientific expedition to stay trapped there, in the middle of the war between similar species, gave the human involvement the justification needed to be part of everything without clash too.However almost as everything there was just good ideas.More than the feeling of confinement of certain scenes and a another fight between the bicharracos decision, the film offered not much more.As well, however, that first delivery was far better than the latter. This time the story begins just where the previous one ends, i.e. at the time when the lifeless body of the predator which, together with the human survivor, had fought the alien Queen (not, to Cristina not the Alien...)(is that it has less botox and is least bad) arises the parasitic aliencito that had been infected during one of the first fighting in the temple.Obviously, as it was seen this time, the bug this is a cross between two species that, as all know, the Aliens are parasites who adopt certain anatomical features of the host organism in which hatch.In this way, the new species is introduced in history: the Depredalien or Aliedador, or presiosa.Bueno as it is called to make more easy we put "Tito" and ready.The issue is that this new longer of chiquito is more bad than the plague and to sneak in the nave of predators, is loaded a few (apparently coming increasingly less trained) and weapon les a quilombo so great that causes that they hit the back and crash again in the Tierra.Mas precisely, fall into a wooded area close to a typical and quiet town mountain on the outskirts of Coloradoinhabited by those typical settlers of pueblito Highland with its typical life stories of Yankee film.Worst case, is that the predators had the ship full of bottles with living alien chicks (seen they collected them) so to crash escape them all through the forest to the cry of "that is left is a fucking!". "!!"As expected happens long up that a human half gilastro and quite rabble is close to the place with their mouths open to see what happens, just that one of these bugs violates it orally and implant you a sympathetic parasite in the middle of the chest.A from there and very shortly afterwards, thanks to these bugs reproduce as dirt and apparently become adults almost immediately, you're all full of Aliens everywhere.To all this, as the nave of the predators had a LoJack or something as well, to crashing automatically sends a signal of emergency to their planet of origin, which is received by a veteran predator calling to see everything that happened like crazy "cannot be!!!" - says the chabón - "I lent the car one night and these idiots collide me!." It is possible to che! That outrage!!! Now go to see "there just fits the hull, slightly arranged the braids and leaves to the farts to Earth hot re."Meanwhile here, rather, back in the village, they are happening inconsequential stories of its inhabitants for the film not troop otherwise than putting human characters (above quite poorly presented and interpreted) in the middle of the quilombo to give food to the Aliens.Para give an idea of where comes the hand are more or less: is the single guy who is in love with the pretty and popular girl who is girlfriend with the fachero and evil Flaccus who mistreats and mocks the simple boy whose former convict brother is now good and which, moreover, is friend of the people's Commissar was formerly Jet with him. There is separate one milica returns from Iraq and has to regain the love of his daughter anticipada that much does not register her because she grew up alone with dad.Or whether, appeared an Alien and is them he dined all together in the same scene, around the film lifted a little, but well, it wasn't.The issue is that not long after the accident, the predator owner of the star-shaped ship (his planet must stay here nomas because it didn't take anything), and it lies with the ship was all made ball, with the other deceased predators and above, realizes that escaped all the Aliens that had gathered.Is passed a hand through the face with gesture of annoyance while he mutters "that crazy shit!!!""and knowing that you have no other, it undertakes the mission to destroy all the Aliens and erase any trace of their passage through the planet (which uses a frasquito with a blue liquid that apparently is infinite)".Hence nomas, whoring means quietly and thinking that I could be at home watching television and taking a beer, weapon to the teeth with what he is and goes hunting, but not before breaking up the remains of the ship for no trace (and of course to collect the insurance).From there occur events that all hope and imagine a film of these. Aliens killing people, predator killing Aliens, fleeing, dying extras, actors much blood, screams, roars, shots, music of suspense, more extras dying, and other delights of the film pochoclero.In short, the film isn't nothing more than an excuse to return to deal with the characters.The script is loose, without too many surprises, full of clichés and with supposedly shocking scenes that fail to comply with this task.The special effects are well made but still we did not find anything new. Most of the fighting between the creatures occur in the dark (which is sometimes too much) it is quite difficult to distinguish who is who or who is winning.The role of the new species, the Depredalien (Tito) was needlessly wasted, that except for some features of its appearance is not very different from any other alien that one can find on the street.With regard to proceedings, was convened on this occasion young "stars" of successful series (which here is called a "string") pretending to reiterate what was done in the first installment was convened where not well-known actors to make the real protagonists monsters. However this time was not as actors not contributed anything to please, but rather some dots against, with characters that do not end or convince to generate the necessary sympathy as to make one want to eat that not they them.They are Steven Pasqualle as Dallas, Reiko Aylesworth (known for her role of Michelle Dressler in the series "24") as Nelly O'Brien, John Ortiz as sheriff Morales, Johnny Lewis as Ricky, and several more if they want to know who they are, you can see them in the end titles.The film was directed by brothers Colin and Greg Strause, who wore as directors of special effects in movies such as "300" and "X-Men 3", but that in this case demonstrated that to direct a film complete lack long way to go and much soup to take.Rating: 2 forsaken (Regular.) Most that are beyond the convening of both characters, the film does not do justice to the tradition of the respective sagas, or brings an improvement on the first delivery. Disordered rhythm, forced Vertigo, deaths and blood because if, and a too poor script, make this proposal something unfortunately historiographic and mediocre).Recommendations: If you is a fan of any of the two creatures and want to see them on the big screen again, go, but I warn you can leave disappointed.If you enjoyed watching people die because Yes, care three cucumbers the script or the direction, this film is theirs.If you are of those who enjoy classic suspense scenes of the old movies of Alien which suggests much more than what is shown and that kept him interested and tense, not go. In this film the alien they show all the time and you lose the grace.If you are that is outraged easy when he sees that two great characters are wasted on a bad story almost adolescent video "Friday the 13th" last type, not go. It can give a kick to the liver. |
1,122 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3113 | J-rules | La extraña que hay en tí | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Efectivista, determined to stockings and empty in content. This is how it can be generally summarized this movie, that if not for some excellent performances of Foster i Howard, would water everywhere. | The basis of the argument is quite good: "A couple who is walking in the Park at night, they receive a beating, i the woman carried out a personal transformation to try to overcome the loss of her boyfriend". Up here, everything is correct, but at the time we enter into this process, Jordan fails miserably.Let me explain: shows a change almost Flash, where Foster supplies its trauma i their fear made the society with a coldness i a skill when it comes to killing, brutal, who would be at the height of the own Hitman. All this, connects it with a history secundária, which leads Howard i his team of police, which adds nothing to the film, and to produce very sharp way, just with all the interpretative merit of Foster. (Let's see, if that is important to porqyé in one or another way history have meet Foster i Howard, but equally, Jordan, less subtle, all)Halfway, the film sufré important, rate cuts but solve them quite well with a few dead by Foster, i some excellent intercanvios between Foster i Howard. Finally, after waiting for an hour and half, Foster begins a brief, quick revenge and whole product just closing justita foma, and with a hasty end, more or less as criticism, and where there are four reflections cheap.After this, you say, and why I have to go see this movie do?. Therefore, why not everything is bad. We must stress the great performances of the protagonists and the chemistry that is created to its os is around, above all, with the scene of coffee; the simplicity of the script, which is currently appreciated seeing so many spins empty and unnecessary, justita one-way, and a despanante Foster. (More than one already would like to encejecer as well). |
1,123 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2694 | Ramón Balcells | Los Simpson: La Película | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The pace of the film is trepdiante, the jokes are still just as sparkling and beasts and Homer is in its sauce, always so rude and careless. | When I found out that the Simpsons would move to the big screen I took a huge disappointment. Along with many other fans of the series, I thought the yellow family would be destroyed and converted in 3D and, of course, that the grace and brutality of the series created by Matt Groening would miss. Very fortunately, the film directed by David Silverman is, without doubt, an episode of television led to the cinema and, of course, longer (although not believe that both, then only lasts about 80 minutes). The pace of the film is trepdiante, the jokes are still just as sparkling and beasts and Homer is in its sauce, always so rude and careless.With the Simpsons: The movie I laughed as I have ever seen for the first time on a movie screen drawings than in three dimensions and even I has missed the chord (this video of Marge). It is entretenidísima and no main character has been abused, although I find that the neighbouring Flanders has been softened somewhat on the number. The truth is that this movie which most recalls are numerous gags that confront us, because they are related to the family or the other side (unforgettable moment of the Terminator President). Perhaps this format of film, with a screenplay with development, knot and ending makes you feel different to see the Simpson family, but but to do a movie? And I recognize that part of having a great pace, the script is pretty good, despite having some other too familiar topic.The truth is that there is no much more to say about it, because unless you do not like the yellow family, the rest of the world you see will be, or at least that I think, satisfied. Perhaps the principle is somewhat uncontrolled, because you acrivillan too close to gags, half of which already you know them (malidta promotion!), and scenes that do not come too much beside the point. Yes, I know that Bart kickbike is great, but does not have much sense.So we have a movie very fun and entertaining with memorable gags and others not so much and yellow characters so ordinary, Catholic and hooligan as always. That Yes, some aspects could have been improved, because in some moments gives you the feeling of watching a few Simpsons somewhat manipulated for the more youthful audience. Also emphasize that there are several critical to American politics and gags that make reference to global warming which are not wasted. Yellow fever has landed into theaters with one more than satisfactory result. |
1,124 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1600 | Ramón Besonias | The host | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Well above the spectacular and popcorn maker, The host exorcise effectively the fears and desires of contemporary Korean society, inoculated by the deadly virus from the apathy and despair. | Turn off the TV and we eat to taste! The horror genre has given us little but exceptional moments of good political cinema? in my memory are the night of the living dead (Romero, 1968) or the invasion of the Snatchers of bodies (Siegel, 1956), and also the invaluable M, the vampire of Düsseldorf (Lang, 1931)-, even though they could not tune with the sensitivity of the public nothing receptive to link good show with intellectual metaphorat least the enjoyment by staging it will always thank. It is the case of The host, a more than good political movie, and a no less compelling and enjoyable (at times, but what moments!) horror film.As in Chronicle of a serial killer, Joon-Ho (not confused you, please, with John Woo) showed us that he knew combine intelligence with a thriller with intentions cross the pilgrims that adolescent gender issues, to give us a work that exudes a fierce critique of institutional delay and corruption that his country, South Korea without Fireworks. However, while on that occasion Joon-Ho leads his narration to a narrative poetic and bitter, without offering us hope or shelters who grab our mood, The host seems convinced that only from below, from the construction of a real active citizenship, can his country attacking the Leviathan that numbs and convinces her that the best option is to shut up and wait to the (non-existent) virus(by the way) for the delay and defeatism is thin.In this sense, the protagonist portrayed in the movie family becomes as a plural and lucid metaphor on the Korean citizen mood: clumsy father, boyish and almost always asleep; the unemployed Bachelor, idealistic and ashamed of his impoverished family; does sister medalist, acting always afternoon, sentenced to the sad bronze? And the girl, that girl presented by the director as the most capable of biting the beast from within and without browbeat, is the hope of a Korea as numb as his protagonist, so convinced of its uselessness as that father awakened only by the tragedy of seeing his daughter die.As in his previous film, Korean filmmaker gets without subtlety several fingers into the wound on the situation in his country. Only the boot and the closure of this film say it all. An official brought the Allied and envied United States? is the scene in which the medical team is block and simulates effectiveness to see how goes his American counterpart - worthy of Charlie is (us not forget) the trigger for the tragedy, coupled with the feeling of inferiority and the adocenamiento of the Korean citizen. The position of the director with respect to American interventionism is very clear, as is the vision of fragile, corrupt and little professional institutions, who makeup the reality. In this respect, appreciate the causticidad of the scene in which the officer sheathed in his yellow monkey turn on television to inform those affected.The host not can therefore be taken as a horror film to use (American), although scenes such as the attack of the beast in the park or the terrifying spitting of the animal in the sewer well worthy of shark or Alien (this is how we are presented with this movie posters and promotional videos). Well above the spectacular and popcorn maker (which already for just these reasons is a great proposal to enjoy two Sabbath hours), The host effectively exorcise fears and desires of contemporary Korean society, and by extension, as already did it the stylized V for vendetta, of all the countries of Western (and westernized), inoculated by the deadly virus from the apathy and despair. Perhaps the most beautiful of the film is the scene which the father (the entire family) struggles to get out of the bowels of the beast to his daughter. And the rain that wraps everything in Joon-Ho movies, as washing, who soaked, the darkness that surrounds them (does in Eastern iconography water seem to possess this dual role of Messenger of fate? see The ring or Dark water- and restituidora turn of the order). And this priest, approaching the child that her daughter rescued and that he himself shall adopt as its own. And, above all, the iconoclastic and ironic, final worthy of Billy Wilder. |
1,125 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3586 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Romanzo Criminale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The best: Stefano Accorsi and see that Italian cinema can copy the dynamics of American cinema and remain true to its principles. | There are films whose main problem is that they are not able to limit. They are so ambitious that they try to count too much and end up lost in the immensity of themselves. This is the case of Romanzo Criminale. Her story could have been a good drama, a Thriller extraordinary or an immeasurable story police or action but as not he opts for none of them is actually a standard example of the same. The side effect of this is that you need two and a half hours of footage to tell their story. A story that occasionally fool not knowing what character is the protagonist or who are the good and the bad. It is normal because the book was extremely extensive and the solution passed to eliminate characters or even join them. Rulli and Petraglia, writers of the film, had to make this mammoth adaptation. The Lebanese, the cold, the Dandy, the Commissioner Scialoja (a modern Javert), all they have a key role in the plot and they have been treated with very delicate strokes. They personalize the clichés of the genre film as well as Italian stereotypes which gives each of them a charisma without which the tape would not be half as effective. The Italy of the 1970s is the ideal setting for the narrative of Romanzo Criminale that recounts the exploits of a group of Roman criminals for thirty years living and sharing the Italian story until 1992: attacks, kidnappings, the murder of Aldo Moro, drugs, theft, blackmail, corruption despite their daily actions.The "band of the Magliana", takes its name from an area of Rome and is a really compact group, because they carry a lifetime together. These friendships that can make people reach unexpected limits. His coolness and actions that levaban out were really shocking that despite its operational cores and have controlled the mafia of the center of Italy they were excessively cautious, secret and violent. Trying personalized in a very insistent and convinced Commissioner justice across of what makes them will continue as it has evolved to make it difficult.There is something that the director has done tremendously well and exploit the idea of the Bandit to narrate the adventures of the characters and create a sympathy of the audience towards them also including the best resources of the social and documentary film with time images or sound recordings (such as the call of the Red Brigades to the family of Aldo Moro to tell them where to find his body)(, the attack of the Pope.). At first to have been the first Tarantino films (which were still bright and not just decent) will see a mount that will be very familiar and cools as the story progresses.The best: Stefano Accorsi (the last Kiss) and see that Italian cinema can copy the dynamics of American cinema and remain true to its principles.DATA of the film: He presented at the Berlin Film Festival. He won David di Donatello for best director of photography, design costumes, editing, production design, script, actor cast (Pierfrancesco Favino) and Visual effects. Premiere in Italy: 2005-09-30. Come to Spain if does it nothing in early 2008 dubbed. |
1,126 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2241 | Francisco Bellón | Bajo las estrellas | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Under the stars is a more than worthy first film, whose greatest exponent, apart from the prodigious work of Alberto San Juan, is its great realism. | A film generates high expectations before its release and is not a big Super production is good news for the set of the film. However, are not few occasions that these expectations may turn against, that it may not be equal to what the public (and the terrible and anti-social perfidious Albion so-called critical) had imagined. This may be the case under the stars, after sweeping to victory at the Malaga Film Festival has become one of the most anticipated titles of the Spanish film.Expectations created around under the stars are very large, both by his overwhelming I triumph in Malaga by the precedent set last year Daniel Sánchez-Arévalo. The film, which adapted the novel by Fernando Aramburu the trumpeter of the utopia, narrates the return home of a crápula, Benito Lacunza (Alberto San Juan), who on his return will find with many surprises, and not all pleasant. Sponsored by Fernando Trueba, Félix Viscarret performed an opera prima which deals with a complex, sensitive and thorny history. Shot as a comedy-drama, one of the greatest virtues of the tape is the strength of his script, which has a very well built and absolutely credible characters that anyone can identify. Since that starts the plot, the Viewer is immersed fully in it, experiencing the same experiences of the characters, laughing and suffer with them. In the movie there is a clear ambivalence between the drama and the comedy, battle the when no winner, which becomes a burden as they pass the minutes. There are some moments in the intensity of the history lapses, and in honor of the truth, the aesthetics of contemporary western that accompanies the first half of the film hurts more than it benefits; by this setting (music comes to become strident soon) there are levels reminiscent of the absurd and the pure surrealism. Apart from these details, the work of Viscarret is absolutely impeccable. The most remarkable low stars is the interpretation of Alberto San Juan, which endorses completely to this crápula tender and charming of Benito Lacunza.Bajo stars is a more than worthy first film, whose greatest exponent, apart from the prodigious work of Alberto San Juan, is its great realism. |
1,127 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3584 | Matías Cobo | Mataharis | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Although their stories are small and are glued to the real as a tire to asphalt, 'Mataharis' addresses from the lucidity of suggestion many and varied Affairs of eminently human content | Film is more wise and artistic as it suggests, displays, or sugestiona that when he indoctrinated, he lectured and judgment. Probably also conform more to the truth of his story when he creates his characters and stories under this premise of honesty. Icíar Bollaín film seems to evolve, and for good, on this path of plot minimalism which raises questions without offering definitive answers to the Viewer. Mataharis, his latest film subsequent to successful tape social complaint was Te doy mis ojos, delves into this way more polyhedral when speaking about the characters. Three actresses (Najwa Nimri, María Vázquez and Nuria González) embody other so many women at different stages of their lives, distinct much from the other, which should make decisions about how they want to be their life or how to redirect it in its current state.This issue of our decisions at specific crossroads as vital chisel, appear to be present at all times in the film. An example of this is found in the invaluable dialogue between the character of Nuria González, private detective and co-worker of the other two protagonists, with a client that has requested follow-up to his wife that he suspected an infidelity. Confirmed this, man, between shocked and depressed, he wondered aloud: "How has been able to do me this?". Detective Carmen, the friend then of the client, espeta him: "the important thing is not whether it is or not with another, the important thing is why".This sequence, together with others of the film delves into other plot axis: how a person who has lived for years is we can reveal as being strange and almost alien to our existence, noting the cruelty of an accompanied solitude.It is clear therefore that, although their stories are small and are glued to the real as a tire to asphalt, Mataharis addresses from the lucidity of suggestion many and varied Affairs of eminently human content. It will probably not come to the master, but this new work of the Madrid filmmaker confirmed as one voice more than interesting among our filmmakers. |
1,128 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/102 | Juan David | Zathura | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Adventure movie for kids quite entertaining | What first catches attention of Zathura is its similarity to Jumanji, which is not uncommon that this film supposed to be Jumanji 2 but when already failed the actors of the first part they decided to continue with the movie as if it were independent but still the Association is obvious, in fact the big difference between the two is that Jumanji possessed some history and this movie is rather a succession of adventures with a surprise ending which makes the movie rather improve.This time two brothers are left an afternoon alone at home by his father under the care of his teenage sister who sleeps only, in a match the small finds in the basement the Zathura game and convinces his brother to play. To their surprise home to start the game appears in the middle of the space where should continue playing facing aliens, meteorites and robots to go home and put aside their differences.ZATHURA is true kinship with children's films from my time in that sense rather appeals to nostalgia which could make it enjoyable with more adults however is mainly a film adventures for children and quite entertaining, even if the script is only an accumulation of episodes after others until the end where there is a discovery that puts the movie into perspective and gives some warmth and a messagesimple, but at the end and after message. |
1,129 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3392 | Francisco Bellón | La Torre de Suso | 3 | 5 | muchocine | La Torre de Suso is a breath of fresh air in the current film scene, a tender and beautiful film that goes to the heart of the viewer and so comforting. | When we say that a film touches on topics close to the spectators, the vast majority of them flee despavoridos and try to put the most possible ground between himself and theaters that project the aforementioned film. This is because almost all the times commented that a film, it turns depressing and totally disheartening, to have a certain look positive.But La Torre de Suso is a movie that touches on topics close to the spectators, but does so from the point of view of a comedy. A comedy human feelings and characters, but comedy and all, that it leaves a pleasant taste in the mouth at the end. The debut in the direction of Tom Fernandez, tanning television screenwriter, is a classical proposal which, ironically, is very rare in contemporary cinema. With a gentle and tender story, well built characters, as well as a fair and necessary drops of humor, Tom Fernandez has managed a cheerful film that revitalizes all those that do. And if all these ingredients add that the story is told from a certain magical realism, the result may not be but good. All actors play a magnificent job, although it should be noted Javier House, Gonzalo de Castro and a hilarious Malena Alterio.La Torre de Suso is a breath of fresh air in the current film scene, a tender and beautiful film that goes to the heart of the viewer and so comforting. And it also serves to demonstrate a realistic story that touch everyday topics from a gay point of view can be counted. |
1,130 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3946 | Andrés Pons | El ojete de Lulú | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A final touching al gore, a film very badly shot, technically curious but neglected in his argument is even unpleasant. | Corrupt TITO CHINCHAN one of the most prominent critics of much film reminded me of this film that I was not remembering. It is morning down to the dusty attic where I still keep a very dusty VHS collection and discover to my happiness the eyelet is located therein.JESUS FRANCO and LINA ROMAY is one of the most horny couples of Spanish cinema, the most prolific director I worked with his muse in many occasions from the tomb of the living dead or sex is insane also to produce him and working on various aspects in the own fantasies of Lina who directed above all pornography.A woodpecker for three or the chuponas leave no doubt of the arguments, certainly the most bizarre of all is this talkative asshole that leaves you completely speechless before such occurrence, proving that adult film of the era had an imagination far above the current. Of course the filming is terrible, penetrations or see and note the hand of JESUS with fucking Mania to get the ZOOM to each scene.A final touching Al GORE, a film very badly shot, technically curious but neglected in his argument is even unpleasant. |
1,131 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/630 | Caruco | El laberinto del fauno | 5 | 5 | muchocine | El laberinto del fauno is the masterpiece of Guillermo del Toro. A lesson in wisdom of storytelling in film; the quintessence of the imagination; and a masterful performances. | It must be said already. El laberinto del fauno is the masterpiece of Guillermo del Toro. And who subscribes to this recognizes that mortally became bored with the Devil's backbone, or disappointed with Hellboy. So, Cronos to part, the bar wasn't too high, still and admitting that the Mexican director has this so-called own universe and a very special touch.Had their possibilities this story, hybrid between horror and poetry; and the harsh environment of the reality, that of 1,944 post-war Spain, and the internal fantasy world of Ophelia, the young protagonist. Especially after his triumphant passage through the last Cannes film festival where, unfortunately, did not obtain any prize. So what? Instead they got a standing ovation from the audience of. more than 20 minutes!And expectations are met. or rather, unfulfilled for the better. Because, ladies and gentlemen, in agreement that it would be best that anyone interested in seeing the movie her discover if same, but is that we we have: a lesson in wisdom of storytelling in film; the quintessence of the imagination; and a masterful interpretations, especially in this brutal captain who plays an incomensurable Sergi López, the face of evil incarnate in fascism; but it is also the girl (Ivana Baquero), doctor (Alex Angulo) or a housewife keys helps to rebel militias (Maribel Verdú); a good handful, not just two or three, sinó ten, fifteen, twenty, of scenes and absolutely extraordinary moments; and a mounting and pace that no lapses in no time.Anyone who loves the fantasy genre, and cinema, faces, now, already, a work which will be of reference, with numerous references to classic tales, especially to "Alice's adventures in Wonderland". It does take advantage of minutia, archetypes, and stories that seemed mil views, worn. And yet the bull so he reinvents.A story Baroque, sinister and dark as it has defined it its author, who also stresses, with acuity, yours is a fable for disobedience within a social framework in conflict and repression. In estecaso, within the framework of a divided and lost, Spain with an oppressive power and blunt contro anyone who will skip the rules. In the laberinto del fauno is a 13-year-old girl who runs away from the sordid reality that surrounds. Orphan of father, mother (Ariadna Gil) forced a marriage commitment with a sadistic and vain character, Captain Vidal, who is only interested in his son expect the wife, and that no doubt it will be male. Basically a poor man who only knows killing, or a bitter make life impossible for those who surround him, "Vamos Serrano is a very worthy of die form!", yells at one of his officers when they persecute the maquis hidden in the forest.For example, one of the scraps of the genius of del Toro is located in the same presentation of Vidal's character. Shown with mild, but accurate strokes: looking at a broken clock (a reminder of the obsessions inherited by his father) to complain about the inpuntualidad to get his wife; and shortly after the hand of bad ways Ophelia by a slight misunderstanding of it.And this rural and isolated framework conducive to the evasion of Ophelia, the only is form of comfort it and maintain the purity of his innocence. For this reason, in an environment as black, Ophelia dreams with bugs, pale men with eyes on his hands, with giant toads, mandrágoras chillan, fauns aspect unattractive or hadas-insecto. Wondering the viewer what to be real in all this.Without disclosing anything, the answer given by the film itself. Fantasy, imagination poetry is, of course, first and foremost those who know to look. |
1,132 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/334 | Tito Chinchan | Los bingueros | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A cult of Spanish scurfy cinema film. In his time, he had more than a million and a half viewers in the film, is not feat. | You never have been to bingo? I've only been once and it was very funny. To begin with, an unbelievable, given stress that kid numbers accelerated and not gave me time or to scratch me nose. Then, in what your're honing the marker Carioca, a snowing sings line. And a fat, bingo. And your with stupid face. At the end of the day, apart from the money we lost, we we have a boligrafazo someone what, he threw it as we not mention in the evening, us. Played us nothing (except the boligrafazo), but to laugh.The film is about Fermín Cejuela (Esteso) and Amadeo Savoy (Pajares). The first was dedicated to pick up eggs and know if you have chick inside or not, standing for life. The second, worker's Bank with a burning desire to fortune. For various reasons, they reach his ears the possibility to get lots of money on bingo. So, by the ups and downs of the film scurfy, nothing less falling together, Pajares, Ozores and Esteso, that more can you ask?Well, we have to Pajares, Esteso and Ozores, the Kings of patria dandruff. And then small holdings, as the Normal Duval (or so says the IMDB), Florinda Chico and a black in balls which I think is called Africa. The subject shows US the sad Spain of transition, where the opening to the game meant that españolitos lost their savings. Insane script, with impossible phrases that disarm to the painted. And clearly, the plot hooks, given that it is impossible to know where it will go. In addition, has everything what is expected of a film of these gentlemen, women in leather, game, persecutions, easy jokes and dandruff on all sides.In short, a cult of Spanish scurfy cinema film. In his time, he had more than a million and a half viewers in the film, is not feat. And I say, if there is freakis who worship films of grotesque drawings with giant heads, as there will not be freakis of Pajares and Esteso? I, the first of them. The peak of the Iberian dandruff.Besitos.P.D: "do you say to the washer?" The cheapest sell. No, that says that we must change the drum. "Yeah, man, and the trumpet" with these dialogues, that leave?Pd2: "were the Franks Germans?" "The Franks were Galician from Ferrol!" patriotic humor on all sides. After saying that, grab a urinal and is going to shit.P.D.3: Strong, had a coach which he said "have given Me a clock, but I can not put" and you wondered, "why?" and answered descojonado of laughter "that is wall!". Damn, is that he pulled him out of this film.P.D.4: "If I have the black" says Esteso a black kid on top. That very fine humor. By the way, because always leaves a black in pelotas in Pajares films? Is it to give an exotic touch? I say that because in Spain, at that time, few were. |
1,133 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3955 | Iñaki Bilbao | El número 17 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Very entertaining film of the wizard of suspense in its stage, logically, English, because that is the year 1932. | "A man enters a large House which is for rent and discovers a corpse." But it is also a beautiful girl scared and a ratero. When they are talking about trying to be clarified, called at the door. They are a beautiful woman and two men, deaf and moulting. "But they aren't clean wheat."Very entertaining film of suspense in its stage, logically, English magician.Appreciating the constants that would always keep climax expressing, well sustained intrigue and suspense in some scenes.Well directed, yes you can see today, which makes true grace, the use of models, such as the intense scene of the train and the bus going in parallel. But we must take account of the year in which it is directed.Humor and action well combined and short duration, as it was customary then.It leaves good taste.It is Queenie in their main roles by Leon M. Lion, Anne Grey. John Stuart. Donald Calthrop, Barry Jones. Ann Casson, Henry Caine and Garry Marsh. It is British production and the year 1932. |
1,134 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1433 | Caty | Cadena Perpétua | 5 | 5 | muchocine | It is a pity that perhaps not will take none of the Oscars which was nominated (although already know how these awards), but his great reception among the public was perhaps the greatest reward that could be. | I remember that when I first saw "Perpetual chain" some years ago in a pass at dawn by La2, occurred, between the movie and me, one of these "arrows" that notes nothing more see the first images on the screen. And made me a lump in my throat at the end, when network and Andy at the end are. Since then, every time you passed the film on television, leaving what had in hands and gave me to see her.Finally, her I bought on DVD. Some days ago, I went back to take a look to write this article with some property and again began to feel the old knot often accompanied me when I had the opportunity to sit in front of her. With a screenplay based on a story by Stephen King, imprisonment of director Frank Darabont, really can be considered one of the great Decade of the 90.Andrew produciones Dufresne(Tim_Robbins) would not have much to highlight if what we saw on the street. Very correct, incorruptible to a great extent, is the Executive of a large bank.A common face, a common life. Run the 1940s. The fact is that the existence of this person gives a twist completely when he discovers that is deceived by his wife with a golf player. It is drunk. He comes to think of killing her. With the gun in hand, trembling, I thought if doing so or no.pero did not do so. Meanwhile, the same night someone murdered his wife and her lover leaving a lot of evidence that pointed to Andy. "Sentenced to two life sentences, he was taken to prison, where their dreams were locked under seven keys among violent prisoners and abusive guards.""Perpetual chain" could be seen as a film about a friendship, how Andy is in its partner network (Morgan Freeman) all the nobility and confidence that, in an environment so hostile seems impossible to imagine. But the truth is that the true leitmotif of the film is the feeling of hope. On how dreams persist living and intense for decades and decades, even in circumstances under which, the hopelessness and disappointment they would dent in anyone.At a time of the footage, one of the inmates more elderly, Brooks, finally receives his conditional. What should be very gratifying for the old librarian just transforming into shouts and tears. "After 50 years here, these walls is everything that the known", I would say network. And that was what was happening. The world outside, for the old Brooks had been transformed into a monster that devoured himself. The had already become accustomed to the jail. That was their world. Those walls were their freedom. Those prisoners were true friends. And that fear of living out of Shawshank prison make that Brooks would prefer to flee otherwise: hanging from a rope in her room rented nothing more going out into the street. But Andy didn't so not conformed. Even after two decades based on suffering the worst physical abusos-tanto as psychological - to which a human being can be subjected, the still kept the flame burning. "Beware, the hope is dangerous here inside" network warned. But Andy not heard. And hopeful continued. He didn't want great luxuries, only a simple life, a beach in Mexico, a ship old to navigate and earn enough to subsistir.y a beer in the Sun, exactly as that day on the roofs of the prison. Or like when Andy sneaks into the garita of the guard to put them through the speakers an album with "The marriage of Figaro" prisoners (I have no idea of what the hell sang those two italianas.y the truth is that I do not know it, good things don't need understand them.) I guess they were singing about something so beautiful that I could not express themselves with words, and precistamente is why made you the heart throb. I assure you that those voices you rising higher and further that no one living somewhere so gray could dream. was like a beautiful bird had entered our monotone cage and would have dissolved those muros.y for a brief moment until the last man in the prison felt libre.claro the warden that didn't like anything. (Andy he fell two weeks in the hole by that Act) and the same applies to hope: no matter how many beatings you receive, how much you humillen.ella, the hope is always there, guiding you and making you go ahead. And for men like Andrew Dufresne, hope never disappears.What most draws the attention of this production is the script, which is very well developed and worked, emphasising the harsh reality of who is behind the walls of a prison and has to survive knowing that it does not have nor the most remote possibility of going out into the street and above it is innocent. It presents all the situations that can occur in a jail, from discussions between prisoners until the corruption in officials and administrators. One of the strong points of its history is also the way in which the prison is reflected in such way that is a world quite apart from abroad, with values that do not have to be equal to our own, to free citizens. As for the characters, their dialogues are excellently prepared. While Andy demonstrates that hope that we talked about above, network assumes the role of the man who is there to comfort him and to show the reality where he lives, is more realistic, more resigned with his destino.y to the end just ilusionando with Andy, starring in an encounter that leaves completely without words at the end of the projection.The conclusion I got from this film is that we can imprison a person, to his body, but never can we imprison your mind, your spirit. It is a pity that perhaps not will take none of the Oscars which was nominated (although already know how these awards), but his great reception among the public was perhaps the greatest reward that could be. In 1966 Andrew Dufresne ran away from Shawshank prison. The only thing found was his inmate clothing stained clay, a tablet of SOAP and old hammer of gems practically spent so much use. I remember that I had thought that a man would take 600 years to dig a tunnel in the wall with him. The old Andy did in less than twenty. Andy loved to geology, I guess that you fit with his meticulous nature.For him, the time passed slowly, as in the Glacial era. Geology is the study of pressure and time and in fact, that's all we need: pressure and time, that and a big poster.As I said earlier, in jail a man makes almost anything to keep your mind occupied, the favorite pastime of Andy was to take pieces of that wall to the courtyard, handful to handful. The night of his escape, Andy did what was commanded: left the warden shoes like two mirrors. The guards, nor were evangelicals either, honestly, how often you look at the shoes wear another man?. Andy reached freedom dragging for 500 yards in a pipe full of crap that stank as I cannot or imaginar.o may not want to imagine me what. 500 yards, the length of five fields of football, almost half milla.a the next morning, more or less when Raquel Welch revealed her little secret, a man that no one had seen before entered the National Bank of Mainehitherto not existed only on paper. He wore his documentation in rule and his signing coincided with men they had front. "That morning Andy went through nearly a dozen banks, in total left the city with more than 370 thousand dollars of the money had been shutting warden Norton with an imaginary identity: their"compensation"by the age of 19". |
1,135 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2779 | Kiko de España | Matador | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Very funny, mounted of fear, with a lot of guideline posters most chik and an elaborate plot that takes not more than 90 minutes of good cinema. | Pop cinema, but seriously. "Matador", written and directed by Richard Shepard is one of the best of last season. And it is for several reasons. It has a marvelous pair of actors, with Pierce Brosnan brutally funny, wonderful, in the best performance of his career and the always effective Greg Kinnear in another emotional role of "looser".The story is original: a Hitman (Brosnan) "burned", as the last Zidane, and a businessman whom life no smiles especially (Kinnear) try out of a crisis by the loss of his son by his wife (the fantastic Hope Davis), known in the bar of a hotel of Mexico. (almost as "Lost in Translation")Since then forms including a fun (and freak) friendship.Pierce Brosnan leaves Bond the ballast and desmelena in a hilarious composition (including spoken English) accompanied by half of the odd couple, Kinnear.La photograph by David Tattersall ("The Green Mile" or the last three episodes of "Star Wars") is impeccable, with colors that are out of the screen and that seem taken from a movie by Almodovar (like the title), and the soundtrack is tremendous (begins with The Jam and ends with The Killers), although the score of Rolfe Kent reminds "Forrest Gump".Very funny, mounted of fear, with a lot of guideline posters most chik and an elaborate plot that takes not more than 90 minutes of good cinema.Highly recommended, the couple Brosnan/Kinnear, historical.A phrase: "does perhaps the men of success do not have blood on their hands.?" |
1,136 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/701 | Tito Chinchan | El principe de los ladrones | 3 | 5 | muchocine | You should have seen the poster before seeing the film, I would have saved the sleepy time. | You should have seen the poster before seeing the film, I would have saved the sleepy time.The film is about brothers, specifically two, one of them is in a horfanato and the other with a good family. So on the horfanato escape, rescue the other and they will find life in Venice. Seconds rather than eat them rats, appears another kid with a mask of pointy nose which leads them to its cache. None other than the Prince of thieves in person is the mysterious kid. One day, an order reaches his band of young thieves, which dinamitará the foundations of human reason (or something) so.Well, what to say that no you imagineis? A picture so the chavalada take the afternoon at the cinema and the parents acurruquen to take the siesta. A story facilitates, some very young characters and some very childish situations make elders we do something soporíferos to watching the movie. I finished not like, not by anything in particular, if not for that I had a preconceived idea very far from what I found. For next time, mind blank before seeing anything.In short, the muchachada will enjoy the adventures of this group of young thieves. Parents, I guarantee it.Rating: 3 out of 5 If you're a kid. If not with a 2 is that it kills. If you're from Mars may give him a ** ^ ¨¨ ^ ** on $$ %$ &$;) |
1,137 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3911 | Jokin García | American Gangster | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A history of mafia cops, gangsters and polis, excellent Bill and recommended viewing, with Denzel Washington as the best afternoons. | American Gangster is the story of the birth, rise and fall of Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington), the man who managed to form an Empire with heroin until becoming the owner of Harlem, and Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe), honest (to the extreme) police officer that toppled the rule of Lucas, taking him to jail, and uncovering a whole network of corrupt polícías comprising 75% of the strength of the Narcotics Department of New York, in the early 1970s, in a story that happened in reality.The film, despite its duration (more than 150 minutes), presents one invoice more than notable, and although perhaps it falls a little short in its drive toward the category of películón, WINS outweigh the good movie label.Very managed the work of Denzel Washington in his role of diplomatic and friendly mafia on the one hand, but with a very dark and violent side when the situation requires, managing to create a very charismatic character. Does not become so cool as in "Training Day" but it comes close.Instead the character of Crowe is left something behind, and although his work is not bad, not reaches the height of Denzel, staying in a kind of Elliot Ness came less, although beware, that I am not saying that this clash. That is simply left something behind. And Justice said that the few times that they manage to agree on screen it is precisely the best of the Australian.The cintanos tells the story from the two points of view, mobster and police, two stories entrecruzados in which Hunter and prey just match until almost the end of the film (with the interview between both one of the most interesting scenes) with all the elements of a good gangster film. And visually is very successful also with an aesthetic very well looked after, and the unique but of a Chase at the end of the film that seem shot by Danny Boyd a day of drunkenness.In short, it is not "The godfather" but one film more than correct and worthy of being considered film. |
1,138 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3712 | Yojimbo | Muerte de un Presidente | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Unfortunately this outburst of originality in the idea does not transform the work in a fascinating documentary. | The title and the introduction of this post imitate the provocative intention of the film. The proposal certainly original. Dangerous for some. Highly desired by others. In any case, a product that unleashes the curious to know what would be the time. Come on, one of the ingredients that would need to make a film in box office or very downloaded over the internet.Unfortunately this outburst of originality in the idea does not transform the work in a fascinating documentary. The main attraction of this documentary would be to see how the world is following the assassination of the President more donkey and powerful of the time. But is dedicated exclusively to invent a theory of the murderer.American cinema has been a turnaround significant when looking for enemies in their plots and wars. If previously the Stallones and Schwarzzeneggers which killed Iraqi and other ethnic groups that hated America, now the bad guys are always at home. A traitor. Some crazy considered patriotic. Some unconscious that trains barbarians which then undermine them.The documentary feeds and closes based on the figure of President Bush: his murderer is a soldier who returned traumatised war of Iraq and wanted to settle accounts the culprit. However, as the American intelligence services are not so smart, they blame a Muslim with a somewhat dark history of the assassination of the President.The main attraction for this documentary would be the impact of that murder in USA and the world. It would cease or continue the war of Iraq? Is it would expand to other countries? How it would affect the rest of the world? They honor and ensalzarían Americans a murdered Bush which Kennedy? This documentary does not get wet and does not answer to any of these questions. A pity. |
1,139 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1192 | Rafa Ferrer | En tierra de hombres | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Niki Caro, composed here a film (based on a true story), unique, poignant and though in some moments Disney seems "played" by the spirit. | Again a movie where Charlize Theron was nominated for an Oscar, but then Resse Witherspoon was that will take the cat to the water by the unbearable "on a tightrope", seems that you weight after her success in "Monster" where I won and played to Aileen Wournos (an assassin real, who died murdered in USA), this has begun to interest in more serious roles, mention besides his appearance more than forgettable "Æon Flux" which opened to a hole in the worst of this year 2006; but well, noe stamos here to comment on the career of Theron, but to talk about the film, which begins in a surprising way and ends almost at a "Increscendo" final one, fed up with devouring tapes "streams" you think master; again we have the "Monster" Charlize, accompanied by side of luxury, Sean Bean (the mythical Boromir of "The Lord of the rings"), Frances McDormand (which repeats this strange gesture that made the excellent "Fargo" of the Cohen brothers), or Woody Harrelson, completely unchecked from his typical roles of vididor.Niki Caro, composed here a film (based on a true story), unique, poignant and although at times seems "played" by the spirit of Disney (where good triumphs and everything ends up going to ask wedding), tape, and once again I subject in one of those phrases that my father used, longer poso.Well, that would have perhaps deserved the Oscar Theron, and not the "Monster" which was not bad. |
1,140 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3790 | Alvaro Oliva | Rec | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Do the great campaign of marketing, with its two great trailers, been that Spanish Cinema growing followers, even in movies (fantasy), and which?Rec? It has become one of the most blockbuster films of the year. | The new proposal of the duo after the documentary Operación Triunfo, Balagueró/Plaza, us closer to the reality, showing us the point of view of the camera of a night television program. While it is true that we want to sell this proposal as something innovative and original, nothing further from the truth, as this format "invented it" or exploded with the sensational "The project of the Blair Witch", something became the most profitable film in history. The feeling of closeness with the characters is very large, since we see the same as them, but one of the weaknesses of the film is Manuela Velasco. Despite receiving a nomination in the Goya, and winning the award for best actress at the last festival of Sitges, I can hardly believe I, and there we have a problem, and good fat. In addition, other characters do not make credible. The combination of terror, anxiety and anger, with diametrically opposed elements such as laughter, jokes and tranquility, are part of this proposal, that is true, it helps us to relax, and more, when we have a good time without having a static framing, not just work at all. Taking references to "28 weeks later", "The Blair witch project" Romero films, have sold us the film of terror of the moment, and the supposed most we were going to have an impact. I have to say, it is quite far from the reality, since they fail to get the fear in the body, nor feel empathy with the characters. That Yes, the great campaign of marketing, with its two great trailers, been that Spanish Cinema go increasing followers, even in movies (fantasy), and that "Rec" has become one of the films over the blockbuster of the year. |
1,141 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1927 | Francisco Bellón | Sunshine | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Sunshine is a hybrid of 2001: A Space Odyssey, Titanic (in advance we know that he won't stay or the pointer) and the final part, the shining. | When disaster films seemed finally eradicated forever, approached the new millennium, and a couple of years before Hollywood took to revive this type of tape. If first asteroid, epidemics, aliens, climate change, and the recurring stories in planes or ships. And when already it seemed that there was not any kind of disaster that could lead to the film, and that humanity had waged for ever this biblical plague, arrives Danny Boyle brings us Sunshine.Hablando of disasters, Sunshine gives us a really terrible approach, which our Sun cools and the Earth is facing a Solar winter. Come on, nor of the same centre of Bilbao in shirt going to withstand the cold if not putting remedy to the death of the Sun. An expedition composed of eight astronauts traveling on a ship, Icarus II (which chose the name was showcased, because if only already portends the tragedy), did the first, how not, fail, more than anything to give more sense of significance to this second mission. Although more that a ship is a giant bomb, to reactivate the core of our star. The film begins with a small apocalyptic discursito, although in the mind of the Viewer is the image of an astronaut on the back of the steering wheel shaking pump its shading cowboy through stars and shouting happily what yeeha!. Small reference to Stanley Kubrick, although the winks just not there, Sunshine is a hybrid between 2001: A Space Odyssey, Titanic (in advance we know that he won't stay or the pointer) and the final part, the shining. Because the film is transformed into his last act, a history of science fiction becomes a kind of space psycho-thriller. The tape has some calamitous details, as human error that triggers the fatalities, taking on the ship as effective computer (do not remember something?), it is unable to correct or even notice this.In its effort to constantly change gender and look for originality, Danny Boyle offers a bad remake of some of the classics of science fiction. And if outside little, remove from the ICU to a genre that was on its last legs, and it justly deserved to disappear. Because a disaster movie is a disaster in itself. |
1,142 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/826 | Oscar Cantero | Casino Royale | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Fast-paced action, bad very bad and special effects everywhere. Perhaps the words that best define vibrant and entertaining. But of course, this is matter of taste. | It goes without saying that I have always felt a strange fascination for James Bond. This twentieth first film of the adventures of the most famous secret agent of the world corresponds with the first novel published in 1953 by Ian Flemming, so we have here the first great work of the writers, which is the adapt the action, the technological means and language of more than fifty years to the present day. This installment has the great incentive to see for the first time the new protagonist, Daniel Craig, is the seventh actor to portray 007 and the first rubio, something which aroused the suspicions of many traditionalists, among whom I include myself. The sudden decision of Brosnan (previous shell) abandon the role, plunged producer in a serious problem, since he had been instrumental in the resurgence of the character, in a latent state since that Timothy Dalton play it for the last time in 1989. It is to be difficult in the times defending the role of a type that has no scruples when it comes to kill, drinks too much, smokes and uses women as mere objects. It is a brave gamble, and it seems that they have returned to hit with Craig and there who cataloged it as the best Bond since Connery. It seems to me, honestly, that lacks mordant and style, although interpretive level is quite well. The new Bond girl Eva Green French, still lacks a boil and Judi Dench is correct in his role of M, the strict head. Otherwise, the usual online: fast-paced action, bad very bad and special effects everywhere. Perhaps the words that best define vibrant and entertaining. But of course, this is matter of taste. |
1,143 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4262 | Kiko de España | Monstruoso | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Americans still do not have your Godzilla: the only thing they have done is put a costume to September 11. | Cloverfield has reached Spain just when the taquillazo has falter a bit in USA, but that is unimportant.Before you start a warning to all those who are "marearon" in [REC]: I non-hypocritical and recognize that if that bothered them to the Spanish they bear not the invention of the Abrams. At least in that right knowing the building out to tail and here the camera focusing on less, but that does not matter because we all know what we are going to see. Those who follow the blog know that The Host I did not like anything and that great Rob knows this better than anyone else, I had the honour (and nerves) appear live in your program and I have to admit that I like more Cloverfield, but neither is a movie of monsters and Americans still do not have your Godzilla: the only thing they have done is put a costume to September 11.SPOILER: at least in the of Bong Joon-Ho they explained the origin of the bug and not, do not bother me at all to not explain a hell in the movie end modest SPOILERRealmente, Cloverfield looks like Transformers and despite being little what we see is amazing, but always from the point of view of the camera that records the day in hell and clearIt moves quite. Level "credibility" has that must have a blockbuster (what is) pulling less (that level of the military launching a missile with the kids before dodging him and my mother), but take seriously. Too much. And that is because we have a movie "characters" in The Host, or as said the great Jordi Costa in El País this morning: a movie of love.Not counting the end credits the movie stays in 1970s and peak minutes (but staying to listen "to them", are wonderful) and the first fifteen and pico are absolutely inconsequential given the ellipsis of the tape, so that pulling an entire Act to submit to only children has a goal: sell (exquisite) soundtrack from the moviewith music by Gorillaz. dolls or Coconut Records, Kings of Leon will also sell. |
1,144 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1447 | Berto | 300 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Good news is printing after a first viewing. Aesthetic quality immerses us in the oppressive atmosphere of the art of Miller. Clouds, crepuscular light, dusty land, strong contrasts of light and full-size textures in the close-up. | Myth or reality? The history seen through the magnifying glass of the centuries? Little is known with certainty about the battle of Thermopylae, but one thing is certain: breathes epic on all four sides. Frank Miller spent years preparing his graphic story about the legendary Spartan epic against the Persian army of Xerxes and released one of his most famous books. Years later, we arrived in the form of film for enjoyment of all lovers of action cinema. 300 Spartan soldiers under the command of their King Leonidas stood up to one million Persians who, under the direction of the fearsome Xerxes invaded everything in its path back in the 5th century BC If the figures are or are not, if the Spartans were called by Athens or win them alone, if servants were or were to heart discovered? Removes you all these prejudices and dilemmas upon entering the cinema. The story here in libraries, only there is honour, blood, bravery, war and death. And Warner Bros., hand in hand with Zack Snyder, her presents to the eye in all its Majesty and visual impact.Courtesy of Warner Bros.. Entertainment Spain and the invaluable collaboration of www.muchocine.net, which we greatly appreciate the attention from these lines, had the privilege of attending the first screening of the "300" in Spain, to be released to the public on March 23. The projection was in original version, to be still in phase of dubbing.Good news is printing after a first viewing. Aesthetic quality immerses us in the oppressive atmosphere of the art of Miller. Clouds, crepuscular light, dusty land, strong contrasts of light and full-size textures in the close-up (bronze helmets and shields, fabric layers, red as the blood that splatters in what is, perhaps, the most literal reference to the comic) help us identify ourselves, for pure sensory proximity. Those who have the privilege of seeing her in the Imax version, I imagine that they will understand perfectly what I say. The plot, easily understandable, we also focused on the story told, let us not forget that it is as simple as the determination of a few soldiers on a mission with a unique and inevitable destination. And the script is right to not complicate it unnecessarily. On the one hand, the Warriors fight as heroes. They only do that, but they do like the best. On the other hand, citizenship of Sparta debate the future of their society under threat in the rear. Although it is true that the plot developed in the own Sparta gives credibility to the fact of the departure of only 300 men to confront an army as the Persian, in the development of the film it becomes in its ballast, in this kind of "intermediate" that leave rest to the warriors and lengthen the footage until the hour and fifty minutesapproximately, it seems something politically correct today, but that would not necessarily stifle the creativity of a work. Can be left here in the air a question: when are studies dare to make films of an hour? When we dare to ask them? I don't mean this to be long, much less. On the contrary, seem to pass flying the nearly two hours. But the pace of the film suffers. The game fast camera? slow motion is masterful and works very well in battles or the fabulous girl of the Oracle, but not in the script, which suffers stepping when the body asks for more. And already at the end, arises for me the great failure of the production: references that remind us, much more than what should to stay in simple references to Troy and, above all, Gladiator. A certain lack of originality, which Yes had shown throughout the film, that leaves us a little bitterness in the mouth. Something that was easily avoidable. I will not, however, remove merit to what is the great centre of gravity of the film. The scenes of extreme heroism impossible battles, are a spectacle rarely seen in the film. A great choreography that reaches its peak in the first Persian Horde that attacks against the Spartans and how are rejected and annihilated. The last stretch of the scene unfolds like a majestic and sublime ballet in a magnificent travelling of purely Greek profile. Soberbio.en which refers to the cast, I think a great success of the casting (although I do not know if bound by budget, since it had to carry the digital post-production almost whole piece) the exclusive choice of good actors in supporting roles, without stars, that that gives realism and credibility to the characters. It just overlooking our mind Faramir, son of the Seneschal of Góndor. Do in this way, the viewer focuses much more on the history and avoid what it happened in Sin City, a close reference to mention: that one is amused to find the features of Frodo in the villain in white glasses?Complies with Gerard Butler as King Leonidas, in a sober role, allowing either more fanfare than their blunt phrases, harangues and that Yes, a few glances of hatred to Xerxes that taladrarían their own Hoplite helmet. What it looks, and much, is body, like all fellow sufferers. Are the girls enjoyed with Brad Pitt in Troy here to dream a few weeks? [As an anecdote of the original version, it is curious that a Spartan king you escape from time to time some Scottish acentillo].On the other side, reigning over a sadistic plagued Persian army of monsters, mercenaries and slaves, is Emperor Xerxes, played by a Rodrigo Santoro who would recognize or his own mother, since this is the change of image to which has been subjected to this role. Owner of a disturbing harem, exercises of God on Earth, aided by its imposing supernatural figure. In this sense, one of the most colorful details of the film is all Persian imagery, based on segmented earrings, chains of gold, masks and their distorted voices to appear more serious, cavernous. This last seems to me a very good touch.Lena Headey is beautiful as Queen Gorgo, but he plays starring the bland part of the film. Next to it, is very convincing Dominic West as bad malísimo. As for the soundtrack, was one of the great unknowns surrounding the premiere after seeing the spectacular trailer with "Just like you imagined", Nine Inch Nails. They have finally opted for a classical composition of Tyler Bates (Typ. Snyder), who also drink other great soundtracks war, as Gladiator (again, especially in the voices) or La Delgada red line, who is approaching in moments of the first half of the tape. However, the moments more accomplished and forceful, much more chords for my taste with the images, are those where used more sugarcane rock. And that is, from my point of view, where the film is also guilty of narrow-minded. Another act of courage would have given to Trent Reznor, or someone similar, the possibility of creating a complete soundtrack that nothing would be reappointing the historical character of the film.It is true that to be based on a comic of such magnitude, nonetheless be a magnificent previously published storyboard for the film, was much constrict the freedoms of adaptation, but a greater balance in the plot or, even, focusing only on the battle would have given much more strength to the film. Her they acusarían long video clip, of distorting the Miller comic? It is possible, but I would have run the risk of doing something more daring and not stay with this regustillo to Gladiator that accompanies you in the last 15 minutes of film. Regustillo I also think that it was avoidable still adjusting to the comic.In short, and from my personal point of view, the film lacks courage where you left over craft and technique. Sometimes it is better to err on the side of avant-garde than of imitator of Ridley Scott (there are things that go beyond the "inspired by"). And the sediment that Zack Snyder is the of having lost a great opportunity. Eye that does not the of having made a bad film, which are two different things. For who go to the movies without wanting to see Citizen Kane, the result is more than notable.Do not miss, you will enjoy greatly. A film for the agenda of this spring. |
1,145 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2326 | Rafa Ferrer | Last Days | 1 | 5 | muchocine | I don't know how such crappy (after its success at Cannes) has come to premiere at Spain, but if you can, flee from it. | Does much (and that the film has been released for centuries in the rest of the world) I decided to see this (llamemoslo "Biopic" call it somehow), carried out by Gus Van Sant on the alleged last hours of the life of Kurt Cobain, the legendary vocalist of "Nirvana".Say that the film is a horrible is staying short, is supposed to be the last few days in his life, and Van Sant paints Cobain as a curious character dedicated to move one site to another without speaking a word (the script of the film is conspicuous by its absence, and they spend almost 10 min. until we hear the actors to emit any sound)the photography is excellent and the hypnotic (by say something good and be somewhat benevolent) music, the characterization of Michael Pitt is acojonante, that Yes, if to my ponen me a blond pelucón and me leave beard!I am also a Cobain! Well it would require something more, but hey.I do not know as such crappy (after its success at Cannes) has come to premiere at Spain, but if you flee from it. |
1,146 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3164 | José A. Peig | El Orfanato | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Synthesizing, failed movie, scares and suspense to go-go, imitating but plagiarizing earlier works. Beauty at the end, but somewhat forced and disjointed with the tone of most of his previous development. Nevertheless, it is an interesting and recommendable experiment of Mr Bayona. | Drinking from classics of the genre as the shining, Poltergeist, the changeling, or the more recent and popular the others of Alejandro Amenabar, Juan Antonio Bayona returns about the same topics to create a product, once again, that aims to justify in the giro plot (rather, it is a turning-point in the meanings) given in the last minutes of a film thatuntil that time, he was dying in his absolute puerility. The story opens with images that refer to the kindergarten, in a sense literally, including the idealization of the image of the past, with that group of children play involved in flower petals swept away by the wind. Photography emphasizes the ensoñador landscape, trees, haunted house, the sea and the lighthouse on a horizon that defines the boundaries of the space of the dream, children and friends (children) lost. This initial segment already hints that the narrative revolves around the lost childhood and the recovery of the past. The final segment becomes on the same grounds, then when the story discovers all their cards, as we shall see.The film progresses as if it were the typical comic about a haunted house that holds the memory of macabre events. We are witnessing a succession of passages and Mannerist tics of the genre in question, with levels, contraplanos, frames, scares, changes of pace, reasons and dialogues, an overwhelmingly puerile platitudes set by little originality that prevails at all levels: both the history and the way to tell the tale. Some dialogues can brand of emetics, and Visual tricks used by j. Bayonne, besides the fact that we have already seen them in a multitude of products similar (and better than this), appear at times unwelcome if we attend to the rhythms, and the proper dramatic progression. In other cases, they are too sudden for violating the same structure used tempo. This, finally, is quite logical if what is intended is kept in suspense to the viewer and capture their attention so not to lose those final minutes, the true raison d ' être of the product. Let us say it already. The orphanage is not a film about Paranormal and ghosts, although that the stratum of Mythology movie fan (and cinéfaga, might add) that uses as a base from which to create an intimate story, an introspective immersion in the tormented minds of Laura (Belén Rueda), the only true protagonist of the represented story. Motivated by the fantasies of Simon, the son adopted, and especially after the disappearance of this, begins a search for his past childhood. It is not trivial that Simon mentions Wendy as figuration of the own Laura. Therein lies the secret of the film. It is the spirit of Sr James Barrie which inspires the ultimate meaning, not that of H. P Lovecraft.Laura regained his childhood from the ashes of their dead friends. Interestingly, images of ash dust and bones found in a sinister corner of home meet the purpose of expressing the revival from the horror of death, according to the meanings game that presents us with the story in his Odyssey to the length and width of the corridors and loopholes of the orphanage. The search and reconstruction of the self and the memory of son lost - along with his imaginary friends, which are none other than the childhood of Laura friends - is, at the same time, search and retrieval of the lost childhood. Believe to see, another common place that in this case reminds us the recent work of M. Night Shyamalan. Note the reader Laura sequence in the basement with the body of Simon, newly found. Laura evokes the oblivion and the denial of the ghosts of the past (through a long circular travelling).The result is the discovery of the pútrido corpse of Simon. Forget the past is bury children, which means the child Simon's death. There is a sort of symbiosis between the life of Simon and the psychological state of Laura in a later sequence, when Laura comes into the children's bedroom, the old bed bathed by the light that enters through the window in the Center, then, sitting in the rocking chair, wished to return to the life of Simon. Then the friends of his childhood reappear, the light of the lighthouse returns to shine and textual words of Simon (the lost boys) children gather around themselves, as Wendy in j. Barrie classic and night profile of the external landscape, embellished with the light of the lighthouse, evokes the magic of the country never never. when the spouse of Laura returns to the orphanageIt has already died for the present and living in the past, in the dimension of the ghosts of indelible memories, in another time.The key scene (Laura-Wendy recovering "lost children" with an act of faith), and can be cheesy, this resolved with some dignity, and is the point towards which walk the entire structure and previous development. But although the worthy end strengthens considerably as a whole, ninety minutes of vulgarity with five minutes of a quite relative beauty they cannot justify. In any case, the claim of combining a horror story with a process of return and recovery of children, that mixture between a dramatic base text and a subtext of metaphorical nature does not have sufficient packaging, not to mention many elements of storytelling that are involved with shoehorn, most any other place that is loose.Synthesizing, failed movie, scares and suspense to go-go, imitating but plagiarizing earlier works. Beauty at the end, but somewhat forced and disjointed with the tone of most of his previous development. Nevertheless, it is an interesting and recommendable experiment of Mr Bayona. We risk even, say, slightly more suggestive and deep than the pretentious and overrated the laberinto del fauno, directed by who here produces, Guillermo del Toro. |
1,147 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/977 | Caruco | Réquiem (El exorcismo de Micaela) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It must be acknowledged that Sandra Hüller does very well, but when the movie gets interesting, VA. and ends. | Best film and actress in the Sitges festival critics award. Silver bear for best actress, Sandra Hüller in Berlin. 82 points out of 100 is the average American critics in Metacritic. And I that I have everything ready to go on pilgrimage to Lourdes, because this species of "The Exorcist: before the start", in version "Breaking the waves" (this Yes, masterpiece), found me a suckling pig Championship, and that which does not last and hour and a half.It had been sold, I don't know if for advertising reasons or less materialistic strategies, as the response in verismo key to "the exorcism of Emily Rose", of Scott Derrickson. Although it is not necessary to specify that any proposal is more "realistic" than a film intended for mass consumption.It was inspired by the alleged case of possession diábolica documented and recognised by the Church, of the young Anneliese Michel, who died in 1976 in the town of Klingenberg, malnutrition, exhaustion, wounds and practiced exorcisms.Fantasy vs. Realidad.Y what in the movie Derrickson, another peñazo, with some effective scene, was the popular and fanciful, version where the religious author of the exorcism was good; Here, and dealt with otherwise, version of author and close to the facts, the young priest speaking rather da grima, let's go! a doubtful fan. In contrast, also appears other cure, veteran and focused on its tasks.At a time when neither science nor faith could perhaps help her too, disease, or bad, Micaela (are epilepsy, schizophrenia, paranoia?), attacked the nerves and the mind in such a way that it not only has problems to adapt to University life or sex.It will also affect the rejection of Catholic conservatism that has instilled him, above all, his possessive mother, and that sense of sin and punishment, which makes it feel a martyr.If she believes see (or see) demons, souls in penalty and santas, is that education, which if had been born in some Asian country, instead, that would appear you would be pale girls long hair scratching walls and floors.A propósito de Schmid.El German Hans-Christina Schmid, Rookie, filmed a psychological test that refuses the special and sound in favour of a purported effects more emotion and authenticity.And you do 'dogma' style, that is with photography the most natural possible, camera carrying? zooms? seemingly improvised, abruto mount, and everything by way of documentary to bring us better in this remnant of life (fateful). And although the dogma productions have given very good results, is not the case of "Requiem (the exorcism of Micaela)".It must be acknowledged that Sandra Hüller do very well, especially when it marking the hands by the nerves, or that creepy that conveys when he can not approach a cross, or takes the language to his mother. But when the movie gets interesting, goes and ends. And I said, have attended a (cracked) piece of life, but without that will move us its history, by sleeping, and leaving means to develop both in the treatment of the script as the secondary characters.For the time being, what the procession to Lourdes like me I think and instead put two candles to Santa Catalina, in which Micaela felt devotion. ' Réquiéscat In Pace' (rest in peace). |
1,148 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/180 | Jesus Lens | V de Vendetta | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Visual and pyrotechnic show of the first order, with a devilish pace and absorbent and addictive images | Now that channel four returns us "V", the mythical alien series starring that sinister eats small white mice, premieres on screen granda "V for Vendetta", the adaptation of Alan Moore and David Lloyd.Me graphic novel like to start this review by saying that "V for Vendetta". It's a peliculón as the top of a pine! Extraordinary. Excellent. Magnificent. Colossal. Well, all those readers who fear a possible spoiler or plot boycott already know our opinion. But, without going into the substance of the argument, the film traces that make sensational and wonderful comment.First, Natalie Portman. Personally, my film same, dress hat (Wayne, Bogart, Mitchum, etc.) or is photographed in white and black, with these muses of the noir genre, poignant and disturbing (Lauren Bacall, Gloria Graham, Gene Tierney.) But from that beheld "Leon the professional" I fell love with a young actress. fine has gone. In "V for Vendetta", Natalie is outstanding and the film, considering it is starring a subject camouflaged behind a mask of porcelain, needed the visible human face to prove credible and identifiable. And that was very special. Mission accomplished.Then, the film has managed to update the graphic novel on which it is based talking about some issues very topical. Firstly, the dismal work carried out by the media of mass communication, rather than inform, make propaganda. Secondly, illegal detention camps, Larkhill becoming a reflection of Abu Ghraib, sinister including hoods. Thirdly, fear of the other, the different, the immigrant.And the mega-macro-hyper Government conspiracies to perpetuate itself in power, reducing the freedom of its citizens to this supposed dichotomy Libertad-Seguridad. And the eternal controversy on whether violence is a legitimate method of self-defense or not. Where ends the hero and begins the activist? Where is the boundary between it and the terrorist?There are many and of much depth the issues raised "V for vendetta", and does so through a visual and pyrotechnic show of the first order, with a devilish pace and absorbent and addictive images.So, if the substance and the form are so good. Why has mounted in cholera Alan Moore, the father of the creature, before the final film product? Perhaps because they wanted to use his name to promote the film. Or, say others, because the character of V is less subtle on-screen in bullet, less ambiguous, more kind Hollywood hero.Perhaps so, but repudiating the adaptability and heaping abuse on the film, as did Moore, seems excessive. Because the film is excellent, because it points toward topical issues, because it takes clear party for democracy and freedom. and because Anuca and I we had as the Indians, in Neptune, enjoying an old-style adventure film! |
1,149 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1069 | Dario Lavia | Doctor X | 3 | 5 | muchocine | One of the first terrifying films in technicolor (if not the first) was reported missing and developed a reputation for "lost masterpiece" for years. | One of the first terrifying films in technicolor (if not the first) was reported missing and developed a reputation for "lost masterpiece" for years. Reicén when a copy appeared in white and black could enhance better film, which certainly was that established the status of "Queen of el Grito" of Fay Wray (whose first onstage enters the library of his father, Dr. Xavier and paste flower of cry for no reason, just because "are you afraid"). In 1973, when a copy appeared in color, found the known (black-and-white) copy was filmed apart from the copy in color (which was aimed at the time at larger circuits). The police are baffled by a new crime of the "full moon killer", and Dr. Xavier (Lionel Atwill, one of the great classic horror "plugged") is called to perform the autopsy. The inspector in charge (usually cash Robert Warwick) explains to the doctor suspects that a member of its Academy of medical research is responsible for the crimes, so Xavier requested 48 hours to carry out its own investigation, so as to avoid a negative publicity that could harm his good name. In the midst of this we have a witty journalist (Lee Tracy) which seeks to get fresh information for his newspaper. Xavier takes the decision to leave his mansion in Blackstone Shoals, on Long Island, with his daughter, his retainers and the four suspected doctors, one allegedly free of any suspicion (Preston Foster) manco; other Germanic and given to poetry (Arthur Edmund Carewe); a third party with a possible history of cannibalism (John Wray); and one crippled (Harry Beresford). There he prepared a series of experiments that will reveal the identity of the murderer (who also undergoes the own Xavier). Announced at time of its premiere as a "film that will provide scares and laughs", the scares are well grounded in climates that director Michael Curtiz achieved through the use of bichromate color, especially during the experiment of Dr. Xavier and the final appearance of the "Monster". The laughter, which supposedly would have to be provided by the occurrences of the journalist and his romantic interlude with the beautiful daughter of the doctor, aren't as effective, perhaps by the forced chemistry between both characters, although certainly Tracy isn't anything wrong in his grimacing. Without having the insistent appearance in camera of the journalist, the film has its subtle profile of black humor, provided essentially by Atwill and their doctors (more delusional than the other one). The true burden is not humor but the fact that history is poorly told, with cracks in logic and lack of synchronization between the characters. In the next horror film of Curtiz, mystery of the Wax Museum (1933), the comic role of Tracy went to Glenda Farrell, whose mischievous journalist at least enjoyed best dialogues.Note: This review is on the copy in color. |
1,150 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4010 | Ivan Villamel | Cuento de Navidad | 4 | 5 | muchocine | In short, a feast for lovers and nostalgic the eighties film, with plenty of references. | Brilliant initiative which supposed from the once popular Narciso Ibañez Serrador, recover that spirit that imbuía their essential series "stories to not sleep", through a series of medium-length films of little more than one hour, intended to be distributed by television, with the fantastic theme and collaboration in tasks of direction of various promising growers of the genre in our country. Pity that the display of ignorance, contempt, and little attachment to the genre by Telecinco (possession of their rights to emit), us is private to enjoy on a majority basis, having to resort to the rent in the form of series B despised or in lieu thereof, to the compilation that has emerged recently in the shelves of retailers in sale of dvds.It is true that six projects, not all have been entirely satisfactory, resulting in the productions of the own Ibañez Serrador ("La Culpa"), and above all, Mateo Gil ("return to Moira") and Enrique Urbizu ("guess who I am"), mere samples of television limited, both in its final content and in the form of poor quality in general and why, products that should have survived solely on these television passes which never (or at least didn't put them in any normal hours). But it is also true that another trio of creators, perhaps the most gifted surely in this storytelling despite its flaws, they offered us three stories of the most suggestive, that transcended beyond the foodstuff or the television movie fan initiative, to know avail themselves if same as products unique and non-transferable. Balagueró offered a clever turn of the screw to the very problematic case of housing in our country with his "to enter to live", which gave vent to his usual brilliant capacity for the creation of coatings with a striking visual aspect and a story very well told, although the small defect that usually have their worksa script and a narrative too debtor on occasions of clichés, contrary to his brilliant visual capacity, even so, a more than interesting proposal for its part. On the other hand, Alex de la Iglesia offered us a story even better if it fits in the "Room of the child", full of moments of pure horror, suggestive and narrativamente impeccable, with a visual resource (from the visualization of the alternate reality through monitors) that gives rise to a scene in the ghostly child, really overwhelming, room in an excellent work. The latest work of "Movies to not sleep", had been signed by Paco Plaza, a great director formally and technically, but on the other hand, lacks in times of a narrative pulse and a personality marked the appearance visual, in contrast to his partner and friend, Balagueró (as I already mentioned in the review of REC).In this last story, Plaza us situated in the skin of a number of friends in the mid-1980s, the eve of the day of Christmas, in a Catalan coastal town (well known for a server by the way). When they discover the body of a woman dressed in Santa Claus into a deep pit in the middle of the forest, they are intended to provide aid to such unfortunate women, until they discover that you it's a dangerous criminal who has fled with a bounty of two billion pesetas. He then begins a dangerous game by the Group of friends, who takes them to treat it as its mascot, with the intention of knowing where hide the two million before releasing it to the police. Uppercase surprise can be considered this production of Paco Plaza, not so much by the quality treasures (which also), but by the fact of being a rare avis within an industry so stiffens as the Spanish. Plaza knows to give you all a tremendous personality, of a sunset in brilliant scene, which is his best movie solo without a doubt, with camera movements and visual resources even, that resemble the charismatic eighties film, one that an entire generation, among which myself, enjoyed despite their ambiguous ideology.All this contributes a script full of references to productions of that decade, from the most obvious and named by the protagonists of the story, as "Karate kid", "The A-team", "The fantastic car", "Dynasty", etc.hasta the most subtle introduced in the form of homage and reference to charismatic films such as "The bicivoladores", "The Goonies" (that gang bike by those greenish places), "Account with me" (the discovery of the corpse in the Woods) or the more stark slasher, which square clearly shows fan.Perhaps the great virtue of the history becomes your default for some thing to some extent understandable. It has always been said that there are two ways of making films, the first is closer to reality for once established the base, create a history fictitious with the objective of showing the obsessions or views of a creator. The other form of film-making, as they say, it's create cinema from the film, the cinephilia carried to the extreme as the basis for the story, as for example do the great John Carpenter, and above all, Quentin Tarantino (reaching the latter perform true pastiches of films little known for the vast majority, but recognizable by the most unbiased cinéfago)(, brilliantly).This last option is which has taken as a square base to create his reference film, a delicious movie and a wonderful tribute to an innocent Decade for many us, but full of magic and empathy with the stories that we had. Can play with the nostalgic aspect (not only movie buff but even making reference to the "Pink Panther" cakes, that popular the Simon game, or the series "V", etc) brilliantly, and there is where lies the great strength of the film, from nostalgia creates a history, on the other hand, possessing an impeccable narrative rhythm, a brilliant script references and ironic vision of that child passion (significant the fact that does not remove in the) (compose the faces of adults) distant enough to be effective.Outstanding work by the Group of young actors, a true delight listen dialogues so close and in turn so believable, being all of them at an exceptional level, perhaps maybe even, and a no less brilliant history Maru Valdivieso in the role of bad function. Little thing can lend you in face of this successful film, perhaps a fund structure and narrative elements and progression analysis would result a certain approach on its credibility in the history, but let us not forget, this is the toll to pay for to revere the time, in which thousands of stories transcurrian more on the path of accumulation and little likelihood that a coherent approach. So ultimately being so reference may not be liked by everyone, but even in that scene, Plaza shows a good taste in the Mise en scène, to not show true fact supposed that it has happened.In short, a feast for lovers and nostalgic the eighties film, with plenty of references that would walk in a long debate on the occasion of identifying them all (even posters of "Not desecrate the dead dream" and "The night of the blind terror" that decorate the room of one of the children), with truly bright scenes and a story that works perfectly so cinéfilo-festiva reference above. A great film, and probably, in its very essence as a reference to a series and a way of seeing the gender, the best of all the series of "films to not sleep". |
1,151 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1723 | Enrique Colmena | 300 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Do once clarified the blunders of some of our colleagues, so illustrious as ágrafos, and the memez feel offended for the sake of people that existed twenty-five centuries ago, we enter in the field:? 300? It is a quite comic book, a fast-paced action adventure and war is one of the first valid attempts to film the aesthetics of the game which today make all the rage in the world... | Let's go by parts: Let's break some of the presencing majaderías some illustrious colleagues of critique have said about this film: one, is not a film made against the Iran of the ultra-conservative President Ahmadinejad (remember that it threatens to turn his country into nuclear power and wiped off the map to the Israel State), for the simple reason that the new representative came to rule in August 2005 and "300" began shooting in September of that same year and, as you know lovers, a film (and less so mammoth like this) does not prepare one month to another; before Ahmadinejad was the reformist Khatami, which ran the country and relations with United States, although not totally, answers were developing clear restoration, until they reached the fundamentalist and jodió the invention. The second point to refute is the alleged lack of historical accuracy of the film; but let's see, illiterate mine, are dealing with a version of the comic Frank Miller wrote in 1998 libérrimamente inspired by the battle of Thermopylae, but without claiming to never have treatment tailored to the historical reality. Is that we will now ask rigour to a comic book? What will happen next, not to believe that the Kryptonite hurt Superman?Another thing: the rebound have caught the Iranians by the alleged ill treatment that gives the film its people are eager to humpback, not to say otherwise; the Persians who appear in the film were, supposedly, the inhabitants of Iran for more than two and a half thousand years; It is as if Spain us cabreáramos because the film release dómine sucks to the Iberians and Celts who populated our skin of a bull makes more or less this time. Once clarified the blunders of some of our colleagues, so illustrious as ágrafos, and the memez feel offended for the sake of people that existed twenty-five centuries ago, we enter in the field: "300" is a quite comic book, a thrilling adventure of action and war is one of the first valid attempts to film the aesthetics of the game which today make all the rage in the world: not only struggles, choreographed and ralentizadas as if a game to Play 2 or the brand new Play 3, but that even the scenery reminded powerfully virtual landscapes imagined by new creators of this art in the twenty-first century, which will have to go looking a numeral (to the way in which the film is the seventh art). Of course, the heroes led by King Leonidas are closer to the fantasy genre which history, with this iconography of supermen of the Neolithic, with their red coats, their heavy shields and fearsome javelins; not to mention already of these bodies carved with "body-building", with more abdominal muscles that we never thought could exist in the human body? Often, visually fascinating descuellan wonderful scenes, such as the rain of arrows, as it anticipates the emissary of Xerxes, literally darkens the sky, and that will have an estrambote formidable, iconic, conceptually speaking, in the final battle scene, when Leonidas faces impending death. Own visual creativity of the Miller, beautifully reproduced in the film comic brings us unforgettable characters, such as the own Xerxes, a Ramayana painted here as a cross between an NBA basketball player and a "drag-queen"; powerful instruments of war, as the fiercely dressed Rhino ride Persian soldiers; or scary characters, like the so-called Immortals, the personal guard of the dios-emperador, a tide of chilling closer to the zombie than man beings. To a comic book you cannot be philosophy, nor ideology, although those of always have rushed to columbrar that a film is pro-Bush to justify the invasion of Iraq and the (hypothetical) Iran. But the truth is that the central idea of this magnificent show, apart from the own joy visual see tremendous battles choreographed as if they were "Seven brides for seven brothers", is that we should always do right thing, what we think, whatever the cost, including life itself; and that must be done from the honesty, that rare Word: without doubt, today this is a revolutionary idea, in a nihilistic universe abomina effort, idolizes the beautiful task of navel-gazing and touching the nose and zascandilea outrageously with the scale of values of each. Not, if in the end will be that "300" is going to overtake on the left Lenin? |
1,152 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3861 | Kiko de España | Viaje a Darjeeling | 3 | 5 | muchocine | To be the comedy more tontuna and Anderson light known to little, normal movie indie cool season and not a masterpiece. Work less well. | The Darjeeling Limited is the coldest movie of Wes Anderson. This means that it is more like Little Miss Sunshine to The Royal Tenenbaums. Let me explain.The Anderson tapes are own stories that there is no adapted to the fictional film and though this film is also, and probably more than any of his other works, is the coldest and the less feeling reflected.It is a little strange because the performances are brilliant (splendid Wilson) but never one of the brothers you imported as well as Max Fischer, Richie Tenenbaum or Steve Zissou.Es the first "pure comedy" Anderson, perhaps why the lack of feeling.Great ideas and planazos (and zooms, clear) House brand are not missing, but on this occasion they seem stuck with shoehorn and almost they Squeak by Grand, but then the director is marked the best sequence of the film doing just that and leaving the viewer / hooliganderson that sweet and sour flavor that you have when your team plays sobrado doing the best party of the year and is left to tie. |
1,153 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1831 | Tito Chinchan | La bicicleta | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The film tells three stories which link in common is the bicycle. To see a Sunday morning while you play with your baby and is too early to have any kind of programming on TV. Long roll. | Already a few months ago I got an invitation to a preview of those that bombard us from muchocine. The film was called the bicycle and had a synopsis as exciting as reading the readings of the boats of shampoo when you go to the bathroom and you forget the brand. Today I'm back to being duped by the medium Zucchini "Ve" down now will I and I decided the baby must have a complete film training, so I think that this is well complemented by yesterday (Isi & Disi high voltage), right?The film tells the stories of three characters whose only link is a Dutch style bike (so they say). The bicycle is assumed to be the same (according to the synopsis, but cannot be), so the three stories live at different levels of space time, and unite to try to make this something of interest. A child trafficker, a Messenger girl and an elderly woman with new illusions are the conductive threads of the three.Puff, this is unbearable. To begin with, ICO funds already pulling me backwards. It begins the film and leave a few children of actors having left a camera, but nothing more. Then go about adults which is not to know Act for nothing. Luckily we have a couple of big players, that you like or not, admittedly they are. Sancho Gracia and Pilar Bardem. The stories do not have greater interest, and only the revindicativo sediment of the use of the bicycle against the tyranny of the oil. Nothing else, is that it is not even touching.In short, film which tells three stories which link in common is the bicycle. To see a Sunday morning while you play with your baby and is too early to have any kind of programming on TV. Long roll.Very weak, very weak.Besitos.P.D: It should be mandatory that all films made with funds ICO action scenes with actors and actresses in porretas. At least, though we we smell it is going to be shit, remove a joy for the visual.Pd2: Sure he likes to my |
1,154 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/821 | Kiko de España | El truco final (The Prestige) | 4 | 5 | muchocine | If not for a few drops of pace too obvious, it was for masterpiece, but stays in a notable high. | Difficult, very difficult to talk about the successes and failures of the new proposal Christopher Nolan without gutting over the account. Adapting a wonderful novel by Christopher Priest, Nolan makes suyacon an exemplary boot: the foreground of the film is beautiful, but as I say at the beginning that it will be very difficult to talk about the film without gutting it, above all of the part (supposed to be) clarification. The first hour of footage (reaches the 130´) it is simply masterful, with great characters that begin to differentiate themselves little by little then end up being equal, and is that the obsession of a man, and especially if this is magician, can be very dangerous. Both Jackman as Bale shine with their own light in his performance, staying Scarlett with a role secondary and more straitened than ever, something that my life grateful to Mr Nolan (Encorsetar: put corset, especially when it sticks much), leaving Michael Caine with a role somewhat confusing (especially in the final part of the film) and Sir David Bowie with the /visionario inventor Nikola Teslaa man (very, but very) ahead of his time.It should be noted the use of the camera on his shoulder, which is shocking in a product of this kind, where elaborate and artisanal levels (that is, of course), and also the atmosphere that surrounds the film, a kind of "movie of Scorsese with magicians instead of mobsters" is expected and precisely these wizards keep you in suspense as to a small child that presence a function. What happens is that we are no longer so children and know that the wizards are always saved an ACE in the sleeve.And the main fault of the film lies in this. And it is not for the classic (and abused already in demasía regardless of gender) Super giro final, because the viewer knows something is going to happen (on all the viewer who has read the novel), but because what happens is not, in my opinion, very well explained, and one leaves the film with a feeling similar to that which took at the end of Mementothat you understand the story "half", although there may be someone whom the end of the tape seems the last trick Nolan, make us feel like one of the characters in the film.In short, it is a highly recommended film, directed by one of the greatest talents the current American film starring two great actors that despite being superheroes (and will remain so) every time they are shown more effective and more records, backed by a great cast and a couple or three splendid moments of pure magic. If not for a few drops of pace too obvious, it was for masterpiece, but stays in a notable high.Note: The Prestige will be released with the title of the final trick. It takes longer. |
1,155 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2877 | Bruji | El señor de la guerra | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Talk about a great deal (really, it is) we accept sugar as a sweetener without calories, and include Cage in praise. | It is often the case that good intentions do not always translate into satisfactory results. On this occasion, to speak of good intentions, I am referring to the brave gamble of the director and the producers of Lord of war, want to address directly the international traffic of arms. A project that forced them to seek foreign investors for his film, not finding capital American because it is a controversial argument. However, usually happens also in film, that the grace of the matter isn't what it has, but the way in which has, on many occasions, and in this story he has blatantly failed "how" to do it. A clear example in which an exciting premise is ruined by an unfortunate script, an inappropriate approach and a little focused direction, which leave a lot to be desired. There is no point have been based on real facts,-such as the existence of military helicopters that were sold as material of rescue, the change of names and flag of ships of traffickers on the high seas, the strange departure from the prison of one of America's most powerful weapons mobsters or the looting of the arsenals of Soviet, after the demise of U.R.S.S.-If not they have been able to take any advantage. The history of Andrew Niccol begins with a close-up of Nicolas Cage (absolute protagonist) giving explanations, that no one has asked, about a life, that it is not yet known, to not know who; and it has two distinct parts. The first of these, especially tedious and clumsily told, is characterized by the appearance of a nagging voice that serves as a common thread, and far from being a critique of anything, becomes manual "the dealer perfect", with an explosion of technical data on the M60 (Rambo I favorite utensil) and the AK-47 (true weapon of mass destruction) that are only of interest who run an Armory. The first part of which all seduces is the idea of leaving the room.Deficiencies in the script (patents at all times) can be seen, for example, in the incredible thing is that a young Ukrainian immigrant who lives in a slum American, without previously knowing the business without contacts and mentors, you not only get entering the illegal traffic of weapons market, but that also can move freely without problems. It must be because in the Cage character figures of five different arms dealers have been condensed, and perhaps, that is also the reason which Don Nicolas ages nor lose professional faculties throughout history. In addition to the absolutely unreal protagonist, screenwriter will make every effort, from the outset, in issue supposedly witty phrases and they constitute definite statements. A goal which is not achieved. I do not know what may think the American Spectator about them, it is possible that even they mean something in that country, but to me little or nothing tell me statements as reflected in this story: "In the world there is a weapon for every twelve people, how are the other eleven assembled?", "the first time you sell a gun is like the first time you make love"": you don't know what you're doing, but it's exciting", "bad fall you in love with the woman of your dreams is that it is real", and other similar features. The woman that falls in love with, by the way, will be one of these trophy wives who are unaware of her husband's criminal activities, but that do not care them to live better than the Pope. And I wonder, is this another real character?. Since then, if so, this you should be called blind trust or excess of hypocrisy. When the naive wife find out the truth, a burst of dignity will prevent you from "fail as a human being", but... and until then?. In any case, a very different approach to adopt another breakthrough, that of Traffic which, for my taste, had a much more normal reaction. The second part of the film, much more promising than the previous one, arises from the fall of the Soviet Union, and in which the voiceover (which remains unbearable) is gradually disappearing. Let's say that we are entering a much more conventional narrative and what is becoming history.It features interpretive duels between Nicolas Cage and Ethan Hawke, between Nicolas Cage and Jared Leto; a great proposal for casting returns to spoil the director, doing work so splendid trio only 10% of their potential. Talk about a great deal (really, it is) we accept sugar as a sweetener without calories, and include Cage in praise. An actor hated by many film buffs, who hasn't done anything decent since Leaving Las Vegas; theory that is ratified with his latest works still not released in Spain, the phantom rider (that must be the version of Pirates of the Caribbean two-wheel drive) and the role of super hero who plays in the last patriotic outburst of Oliver Stone on the twin towers. Something good has also this second part, and is that him director already you will be catching the tranquillo be writer, and get what you had intended from the outset: write a strong sentence in that Cage, prestigiosísimo international dealer, instructs Ethan Hawke, faithful official of Interpol that "his head is the largest arms dealer in the world". Of course, to talk about his boss he is referring to the Antichrist, or what is the same, the President of the U.S.A. clear which. at this point in the footage, already is very difficult to reconcile both sides of the film? should remember that in the first, he urged to leave the cinema - and we think that the legend of the end "major supplier of weapons of the world are also the countries that are in the permanent UN Security Council" should have appeared just at the beginningbecause this not would have subtracted you originality to the story, and Yes would have provided you wisdom. In any case, this is the sad story of an impressive argument which had the misfortune to encounter a director and screenwriter who was suspend the subject of "How are things". A shame!. |
1,156 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3271 | Adrian Bravo | Gerry | 4 | 5 | muchocine | I think that the film is more valuable if we have that sometimes need stripping content images, to slow down the action to see beyond the Vortex and the microscopic details to pass to the fore. | We can go on tour and among the Brambles, find us with a Boulder. From here we have two options. Either hitting a kick to depart from the path, without stopping to think about the consequences, either bend us, hold it between the hands, feel the sharp edges and roughness of the surface, go home and open books of geology to categorize her. We can even save it in a shop window and make it our hobby and treasure, our perfect and wonderful Boulder. For approaching Gerry, first film of the trilogy about death (along with Elephant and Last Days), there is to know in advance of what foot limp, knowing if we are of them walking through the jungle with the machete ahead rebanando bamboo or have in mind to become entomologists, zoologists and observers of the behavior of primates. If we are the first, see Gerry will mean not see anything at all, or see the least. If we are the seconds, Gerry will become more than a vision, I would say in contemplation. The argument could not be simpler: two friends (Matt Damon just before losing the memory in "The case Bourne" and Casey Affleck) decide to take an excursion through the desert. As the road is going to be crowded of weekenders and they decide that it is offroad trekking, they deviate from the fixed path looking for solitude and wild nature. The problem is that they do not carry compass or maps of the area, not even "camperas" boots or provisions. When they realize that they are lost and they cannot give back because they have not taken precautions already is too late for them. And here ends the script. What illustrates perfectly what level can develop one idea, showing infinite edges which has a Boulder is that original drafts of the script for Van Sant was just a line to describe one of the somewhat rocambolescas situations that occur in the film, made on 20 pages in the review made by Casey Affleck. It is true that there is endless levels, could be considered soporíferos or bored, shot Gus Van Sant-style, but in austerity and simplicity of the images and the vision of a mocking and perverse desert that shows its teeth in exponential progression, hides all a collection of gestures, interactions, mood swings, assumptions of reality and dances of glances and madness between the two protagonists thatpossibly for being friends in real life, they are fully committed. The dialogue is minimal, but why not basic or insubstantial, though we do not always understand. Moreover, I think that you one of the purposes of the film is that we do not always understand why act like they do, or why they say what they say. There isn't any spark. I think that the film is more valuable if we realize that sometimes we need bare content images, need to slow down the action to see beyond the Vortex and that the microscopic details go to the fore. At the end of the desert you don't expect anything other than death, and it is no hurry to nail us the claws. Everything in time, saith the Lord of the scythe. |
1,157 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/330 | Tito Chinchan | Yo hice a Roque III | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Amazing script, great cast of actors, rustic decorated and surreal dialogues. An essential wonder in any Caspoteca self-respecting. | Damn, not is that they recorded new films, taking in the Spanish film library wonders like this. They had to Rocky and Roque with his "roquina", where you will stop.The film is two colleagues of the school that things are not going too well. One of them (Esteso) has women and children, while teammate (Pajares) lives of journal a doubtful please made him at the tender age of 6 years. Both work in a nonsense of a detergent Pilón, which causes the first joke of the film called. Roque (Pajares) was Boxer and champion of Melilla, although for many years. On the other hand, Frederick (Esteso) is a retired jockey since it has gained (and is old, that a kid is not). Total, Frederick decides to get rid of his companion tendiendole a trap that combat against the champion, to see if it wrecks. And there is Paco (Antonio Ozores) as the owner of the gym. And it is already bundled.Well, this is not going over the Spanish film. Damn, is very good, all absolutely everything. For starters, the cast of actors, which is the cream of our cinema. Then, the script is incredible, that there are no remaining. What mind has thought this? And originality of the title, which I say this? A wonder. In addition, if add you that nipples from time to time, dialogs are surreal, and the sets are "rustic" leave we face a masterpiece of the Iberian casposidad.In short, essential in any "caspoteca" self-respecting. Although to savor it well, well, it is best to have it recorded on VHS with the "fly" for Telecinco in the right bottom margin. Damn, I'm dying of laughter, that good!Mythical phrases from the movie "not be if fuck you or operating you Appendix, almost better first thing." "I have no neck, I'm poor". Only by hearing this, is worth seeing her. And to tell the truth, gives very good vibes see it. It is so silly that he is appreciated in this world so crazy that we played live. |
1,158 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/770 | Yul B. | Gal | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Do a documentary of short duration very? light?, overly artificial and hastily told. | It is usually more difficult to do a film based on real events in fictional facts. Especially because there is an implicit obligation to be as faithful as possible to the same. But it is that if these facts above are somewhat complex, the difficulty increases.In most of these cases it is necessary to do important work of synthesis to to sum up to the maximum account of events which in reality have lasted years (which we are discussing, 15). So it is logical and normal, that any tape of this genus is tell us the inspiring story of a rapid, almost frenetic form.And that is precisely what has happened with?GAL?. Throughout the entire film, one has the feeling that every moment of the plot there are fast and running, without allowing breaks, to give this time to treat the data immediately after and not leave nothing forgotten at the end. Part of the blame has it the length of the tape: only 100 minutes. Surprisingly little.There are, however, to recognize that the material on which this film is based is delicate: a sad episode in the recent history of Spain on the anti-terrorism liberation groups during the 1980s did the dirty war against the terrorist organization ETA. They were welcomed by the Ministry of Interior at the time, and were responsible for numerous killings and kidnappings, in some cases even against persons who did not belong to the terrorist organization.However, as it's a complicated structure, it would have been preferable to deal with it in a more partial way, without globalidades. Thus is had been able to enter deeper more highlights of this episode, even to argue, in the most rugged; as well as the personality of its main protagonists.The conclusion that is removed at the end of the tape is that a documentary of short duration, has been very? light?, overly artificial and hastily told. To Miguel Courtois, its director, he has fallen short work.What of? artificial? is an adjective addressed directly to the performances of the cast of the film.It must be borne in mind that none of the real people of the history has been literally depicted in?GAL?. All are more or less free versions of the characters directly involved in the case.But is that despite such freedom, no actor cast is saved from this lack of naturalness or credibility, not even the star Jordi Mollá. both José Garcia as Natalia Verbeke, which they give life to the journalists who uncovered the plot of the GAL, are caricatures of these pens.I do not know what is happening with Garcia, but his performance is really mediocre. Perhaps the dubbing post-production which is usually done in a few films (if any) which does not do justice, but does not give the likes of protagonist. In almost all scenes in which it has a text, he recites it as if had memorized it a few minutes earlier, and with very little naturalness.As for Natalia Verbeke, its shareholding in Spanish comedies make losing authenticity in a dramatic role. Put you effort, but fails to convince. It would be missing you encadenase several works of this same court, even more heartbreaking, to become credible in that row.And that I left half cold is Jordi Mollá, in his role as Ariza. In my opinion, sobreactúa. Or at least that is the impression given.Is not for their attitude or by its characterization, because that Yes has dominated it; It is your voice, too forced and unnatural wanting to give a tone so serious, hard and torn. This detail makes losing authenticity to the character in almost the majority of the scenes. Even sometimes it is comical. It is certainly not his best performance.The only strong point of the film is its technical aspect, called photography, editing, sound, soundtrack, etc. Everything together (except the flashbacks that sometimes baffle) builds a scenario very faithful to reality and ideal to clothe a very sinister plot.No wonder why as it was moving the film wishing with all my strength that no character opened mouth. What for?; to spoil her?. Do I still being with?The Wolf?. |
1,159 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3547 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Encantada: La Historia de Giselle | 2 | 5 | muchocine | No grace and no interest this cocktail disneliano for the holidays. | hen the animated characters escaping from their worlds of fiction and landing in London the thing was much more entertaining. Mary Poppins or the witch freshman managed to sing or speak with animals of two dimensions not only make normal if that were not very well regarded. But Giselle, Oh! That's another story. After meditating on this film so terribly boring and silly I decided to entertain me with the fantasy of the enchanted Prince (not teatrero James Marsden that is fashionable after Hairspray) if not with Patrick Dempsey what encourages tremendous Mr to get into the last production of the Disney? I hope that for the pleasure of sharing poster with the Sarandon (another that seems lost in this nonsense) or so that their children who have just come to the world (twins have played the poor) can soon see the movies of their Pope with pride but I just do not see the justification full-scale firecracker. Of the rest of the cast Amy Adams do not have any grace; Idina Mendez who sings as God (protagonist of Broadway musical and West End Wicked or Rent) has neither a scene of singing; Timothy Spall, who has been with Wormtail face until it dies of old nonsense!No grace and no interest this cocktail disneliano for the holidays. Many children with special effects and that they know little of the mythical tapes of Disney that enchanted, Giselle history plagiarism with impunity and little wisdom, and their parents making crossings on how badly that mature child cinema in the 21st century. |
1,160 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1092 | Ana | Pequeña miss sunshine | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The irony is the weapon of the losers and this group of losers this very well armed. | The irony is the weapon of the losers and this group of losers this very well armed. Little Miss Sunshine is endearing as Happiness [Solonz] is happy. The plot of this film is very simple, a road movie. The characters travel by road to Redondo Beach, California to encourage Olive participate in a beauty contest for girls. But that is not what it is. It's the characters who are all complex and more real than rare. Although they are quite rare and fall a little wrong. Above all the frustrated optimist [Greg Kinnear].Although fall ill it is much better to shame. And do laugh more, as the academic gay expert in Proust [Steve Carell] that fails the success as suicide. And of course the grandfather who sniffed heroin and loves pornography. He says above all obscenities, but also tells her granddaughter of seven years: "I'm madly in love with you, and it is not by your intelligence or by your personality;" "it is because you are beautiful inside and out."It is brave to make a movie with characters that I am not exactly good and they have few noble qualities. It's refreshing in a world in which we all be ever more equal and politically correct. A world that seems increasingly a beauty contest after another. Where have we forgotten to ask what is really beautiful, instead of leaving us to feed plastic aesthetics of advertising. This film is a call to say fuck? em and return to see the world through our own eyes.And there they go, in a yellow VW van that may seem a bit unreal, as if only they had chosen to be rare, but after meeting the Hoovers I think that this is the car they have, the other is a miata. They are not randomly selected geeks details, they arrive to talk about real life.In the end the strangest thing is what is real. Both girls involved in the beauty contest as their mothers are not actresses but beauty contests participants appearing in the film of her own volition. By which you might say that is a horror film, for me it is a comedy-drama (which is how conceived it the screenwriter) but also could say that it is a drama that makes people laugh (which is more the idea of managers). |
1,161 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1840 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Tristram Shandy | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Taken to chacota, it entertains. Lost in unrecoverable moments of bleak tedium. It has its place in the heart of the movie buff fact to, from time to time, take you the hair with so much grace and willingness. | Slightly escorada to the way in which Peter Greenaway understands the film, Tristram Shandy (A cock and bull story) not salpimenta its formal daring with continuous absurd, with regressions of the logic and unusual narrative corkscrews. The film is looked for in others and returns, proud, to his dramatic inconvenience to certain space culturalist between the satirical and placidly humorous, between the well contrivance irreverence and the disregard for content and make a round product.Michael Winterbottom comes a classic of the English novel with a reputation of being virtually untranslatable to the cinematographic language (the life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, Laurence Sterne), but not one avenible summary pattern of orthodoxy but agile and viperous decantation of the encyclopedic spirit, reforming the original towards a fragmentation imposed, embebecida film, modern historymetalingual, where the festive turmoil and, above all, a confesable celebration of language, since plot sustainable and archetypal almost there.Boring at the beginning, when we have the recording of the film serves as a leivmotiv of the film that we are witnessing, awakens when Winterbottom stumbles happily with the ins and outs, with the pure bambalina of actors that make actors. And here the film astonished, that does not mean that within the astonishment we atisbemos quality or joy. This young and already tanning filmmaker in some outstanding battles freak (Wonderland, code 46, 24 hour party people, road to Guantánamo or nine songs) works better as a dessert light and greedy, as less than as a first dish divertimento because it tastes with mocking complacency, knowing the difficulty of commitment and giving self-indulgent winks to the harmless nature of the product.The legitimate's wishes mix classical drama and speech metadiscursivo, let me the reader coining this excessive semantic claim, produce humor (there is, dear reader, there is in abundance, although not always hilarious and hilarious) and even criticism within the film into the film itself (first hilada with the last scene).Too bad that is not always understood and some spectators, among those who do not want to include me, the ninguneen because of its apparent (perhaps true) chaos. I do not know at all the original text, have enjoyed his first adaptation to the screen. |
1,162 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1972 | JLO | Tiempos Modernos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Modern times contains one of their best--or perhaps the best - start of any of his films. Chaplin shows in a few minutes, the alienation that plunges man industrialization and the wasteful use of own machines. | Modern times contains one of their best--or perhaps the best - start of any of his films. Chaplin shows in a few minutes, the alienation that plunges man industrialization and the wasteful use of own machines (up is "eaten" literally by one of them).All part of an idea of the clown after his visit and meeting with Mahatma Gandhi, a fervent advocate of the rights of man and of one of the most important crisis of the U.S. (1929), effects which lasted several years. A great moment of the film is the confusion as a leader at the head of a manifestation, along with several and achieved prison scenes (the use of drugs in the salt shaker is unpublished so far).Then Chaplin is lost in an incessant repetition of their own jokes, as providing a dignified farewell to his silent and eternal character, condensing the most successful sketches of some of his past films. Here again are the adventures in skates, drunkenness, the escalator, the smacks, etc; that so famous he did in his shorts at the beginning. At the end, he relents to pressure and messengers for the first time the tramp, making it non-existent - and with the horrible pre-recorded laughter of fund-another mockery to sound words. Thing to do already and with much better tino in city lights, in the opening scene of the speech. The typical end chapliniano starting to a destination of freedom and without end, does not provide anything more. It just leaves us the nod of the nostalgia of the repetition and his trademark.Summary: Carlitos suffers various setbacks with a factory machinery. He later protects a thief, they pass through together a strike, prison, setbacks in a large store and finally, acting together in a cabaret. |
1,163 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2023 | Paula Zurita | Borrachera de poder | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The film is too long. It is interesting and entertaining, but there comes a time where you the viewer want to end. | This film is perhaps the story of what we are accustomed to read in the press or see in the news. Entrepreneurs and politicians discovered more low and vicious actions. Malaya, in a certain way, would be a version impaired, although real, what you describe Chabrol. Does do, however, the director of the? French new wave?, looking for a film inspired by all and a none. And why in the beginning does not hesitate to emphasize that any resemblance to reality is only a coincidence. But Chabrol transcends the evidence and tries to discover the two parties involved in the game of Justice: the official and the res judicata. Judge Jean Charmant, starring Isabelle Huppert, investigates a case of economic corruption in a major business group. While discover information and will unravel the axes of action of officials, its success and its labour power increase. However, he gradually left his private life.In the 105 minutes lasting film, Claude Chabrol wishes to show the two sides of a reality. The conflict does not end with the accused. Chabrol experiment a little further and analyzes the behavior of an official who is also embedded power. Somehow, the director wants to demonstrate the power to catch anyone that SBI holding it for a few seconds between his hands.Jean Charmant, the judge is a woman of fragile and delicate appearance, qualities that fade with his strong character. Sometimes his attitude rubs with the cruel when he interrogates the poor Humeau, one of the accused. Judge removes up to the last detail: the clothes you saw the lover of the accused, the construction of a swimming pool, expenditures on hotels and fruit trees, in short, the public money used as its own. The judge, however, everytime it delves into his research, losing part of his private life. It only maintains a close relationship with Felix, the nephew of her husband, that, although everything remains an ambiguous relationship. Her husband, for his part, Philippe is relegated relegated from the life of the judge from the beginning, unless it decides to call the attention with a suicide attempt. But Jean Charmant is so blinded by his role and position that behaves in a distant way.In short, Chabrol shines in the relationships between the characters. Each one is so intense that it needs time to describe them. By the same token, the film is too long. It is interesting and entertaining, but there comes a time where you the viewer want to end. |
1,164 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/976 | Caruco | Eragon | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A telefilm without hint of some, ideal personality to any desktop on Saturday or Sunday. | What can expect from a novel written by a still immature young man that has came up with the idea at age 15, and saw published the book 20, together with what you can do some Hollywood screenwriter, which tend to treat viewers as if they should have no more than 12 years?And if the project is responsible for a Director, Stefen December, Rookie, and pulling to mediocre. What is the result? Well: "Eragon", the start of an (ahem!) new and great Trilogy for the Navidades.Pero'm going to skip the usual criticism for asserted another comment to game mode. So turn on tiptoe by saying that Stefen December is revealed as a filmmaker without spark, a mere Illustrator totally denied to use the floorplan and both for the action as the more intimate scenes. Or that used the Aerial panoramic landscapes and to place the characters became fashionable Peter Jackson with "The Lord of the rings". Although December used to stun us.Or that photography is a monotonous tone, and that everything that happens, dialogues included, is a topicazo that pulls back. On top of all this, I suggest the relationship that follows on the points in common with a trilogy that obvious, I will not mention the title.Star dracs.The beloved producer 20Th Century Fox is behind the project, and the protagonist is a young farmer orphan who lives with his uncle. It is also blond and seems endowed with a special value. And is not called Luke Skywalker sinó Eragon (Edward Speleers). Eragon hears fascinated by stories of a glorious past on riders and Dragons fighting against evil, go! as if were the Jedi in the? Clone Wars. Jeremy Irons, who recites his dialogue as if it play to Shakespeare, Brom, an instrument clear of Obi-Wan Kenobi.Arya (Sienna Guillory), although it did not unveil even in this film, is an elven Princess. And the young Eragon will be took by its beauty through dreams and visions (which not hologram), has, and will be launched into her rescue. Hence we have to Princess Leia Organa!Robert Carlyle portraying the fearsome sorcerer Durza. Perhaps to express themselves better after the weight of its make-up, Carlyle, with its huge risotadas clear us, if we didn't, is the villain of the function. Belongs to the category of the "it shadow", but it is really an excellent copy of sith.John Malkovich is King Galbatorix, the great evil that has been done with the power. It would be like the Emperor, but perhaps his (alleged) charisma you closer to Darth Vader.Hay a base for rebels, the vardenos, that are not hidden on the fourth Moon of the planet Yavin sinó in a rocky area of difficult access. Their leader, Ajihad (Djimon Hounsou), resembles Lando Calrissian.Se talks about the "magic" as if it were "the force". Some sword is very similar to the light sabers, and there are flashes instead of laser guns. Not missing a scene of career through a narrow passage. And reference is made to "fear", not as what can lead you to the dark side, but the courage (that not everything is going to be the same).The ancient dragon.R2D2 and C3PO have they have left them, but I understand that in the novel, not in the film, appears as a dwarf Orik.La dragon Saphira, the real star of the function!, strikes me as a kind of version of the Millennium Falcon, but endowed with life and with the capacity of hablar.¿Y Han Solo? As the projection progressed me towards this question. And I have to say also appears, Yes Sir!, in the forms of a young boy of black hair.Finally, I retomaré criticism for insisting that December is terrible in its decor, especially in combat sequences. "E fails even in important moments as this is the first time that Eragon rides to the Dragon (? and rhubarb any easy joke in this regard!).""Eragon" is a telefilm without hint of some, ideal personality to any desktop on Saturday or Sunday. And as it brings more sequels, a couple in portfolio, the question is if the second appears to Yoda. Taking into account the desparación of one of the characters, I would say Yes.If someone wants to contribute, or correct me, into something more, I appreciate his collaborations. |
1,165 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1637 | Kamala | Dreamgirls | 3 | 5 | muchocine | If you like musicals, you have to see Dreamgirls. The criticism is divided: that is superficial, on the one hand, it is fantastic on the other. I think it depends on the film tastes: If you like musicals, you'll love this movie. If you do not like, better go to see Bobby or Rocky Balboa. | If you like musicals, you have to see Dreamgirls. The criticism is divided: that is superficial, on the one hand, it is fantastic on the other. I think it depends on the film tastes: If you like musicals, you'll love this movie. If you do not like, better go to see Bobby or Rocky Balboa. Dreamgirls is the story of The Supremes, which is sweetened. Or rather, of Diana Ross & The Supremes. All the protagonists of the real history have his alter-ego of fiction.Dreamgirls is, above all, a musical of success on Broadway which premiered in 1981. The legendary Michael Bennett directed and choreographed the musical (there is an "in memoriam" do to him at the end of the movie and appears in the opening credits? although appears to be that this is forced in any adaptation of a musical film). The success of this musical was enormous. He won 6 Tonys for the year following (was nominated in 13 categories) and the agreement between critics and audiences on this occasion was total: was a fantastic show. Bill Condon, the director of the film, saw this legendary montage of Bennet when I was little. So did Eddy Murphy, who participated in the film playing a kind of Smokey Robinson. And it does it very well. Condon decided he could bring to the screen, preserving the good and giving freshness. Therefore requested 4 new songs to the man who composed the original music, Henry Krieger, and decided to find a huge ensemble cast: Jamie Foxx, which has a best gift of character, Curtis Taylor Jr. (i.e., a kind of Berry Gordy Jr., the man who created the Motown and The Supremes created) but, unfortunately, not seized. Is a very rich character: very intelligent, very active, very fast, very "aggressive Executive", a man with a vision for the future that uses to the of his around to achieve their goals; Jennifer Hudson (putting it on the place protagonist it deserves.) Detail on the sidelines: is the winner of American Idol, the OT of USA. Or, that is the "Pink" Yankee. (And gets in the movie) is Effie White (in The Supremes, Florence Ballard), the woman with a marvelous voice that is relegated by the voice of "white" taste, more nuanced, more light, Deena Jones (do Beyoncé Knowles, which here obviously makes Diana Ross? notice the similarity of names in pronunciation). Together with them, Anika Noni Rose, which is the third in the Group (Lorrell, i.e., Mary Wilson, who wrote a best-selling book telling his experience in The Supremes). It must also include Keith Robinson (C.C., brother of Effie, composer and choreographer? a mixture of the composer of the Holland-Dozier-Holland Motown and Smokey Robinson). Together with them, Danny Glover is Marty, representative of Jimmy "Thunder" Early (Eddy Murphy), a singer who comes to the white audience and will always be close to elimination. They are The Dreams, the girls, that will do.The film is a great musical. On many occasions you have the sensation of being in a theatre and want to applaud at the end of many of the musical numbers. But admit it, is not a great movie. The relationships between the characters only have intensity when the characters sing. For example, there is no passion or intensity in kissing or romantic relationships of Curtis and Effie or Curtis and Deena and Jimmy and Lorrell everything is very cold, very distant, very little real. Do you often wonder whether Curtis and Effis are couple, aren't, if CC and Michelle are?If the R & B is so intense, so passionate, so provocative why are relations between singers, musicians and artistic scene so puritanical? It makes not much sense. The "white" escandalizaban "black" music because had sex, there was passion, intensity, clarity, explicidad in the lyrics, the music, the movements? It is what attracted young people. If it is in the music and not the relationships between them, everything is very cold. This is the movie. But I wanted to speak here of the Supremes. And it is that, after getting into the history of The Supremes, the history of The Dreams seems light, very light, in fact. It seems that Diana Ross was pretty bad bug, something that Deena Jones in the movie, no. Interesadilla, but does not seem to bad bug. And from here, who has not seen the film, which is expected to see to read what follows. The film is very faithful to the broad outlines of the history of the Supremes (in fact, Diana Ross never wanted to see the musical and, however, Mary Wilson titled his autobiography "Dreamgirl: my life as a Supreme"). Apparently, it is true that one of the Supremes, in fact its founder, Florence Ballard, was relegated by the more pop voice of Diana Ross to get to the "white" lists of successes, objective of Berry Gordy. It is also true that Diana Ross was bundled with Gordy. Florence Ballard (pictured), relegated once, he continued in the group, but is depressed and began to drink until he was unable to perform. It was dismissed, but not recovered. Although he tried to pursue his musical career, he had no success and died in 1976, very poor. Truth is also that Holland-Dozier-Holland left Motown for a fight by royalties, not by what was doing with his music. The dispute was by property rights. It is true that The Supremes became Diana Ross & The Supremes, but some of the songs from The Supremes recorded without them (apparently, the song "do Someday we? ll be together", the ultimate success of The Supremes) was recorded by Diana Ross and other singers, not Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong, who had replaced Florence Ballard. Yes, it is true that Diana Ross reunited with Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong in 1983 to sing together "do Someday we? ll be together" in celebration of the 25th anniversary of Motown. While in the film they meet in love and company the four The Dreams, in real life incidents. During the television program broadcast by NBC, Ross pushed Wilson away from her and then took the microphone from the side of Wilson when she was inviting to Berry Gordy, sitting in a Theatre box, download and join everyone onstage. Although all these incidents were eliminated from the Edition that ran, were widely reported by the media.So ya see. The reality surpasses fiction. |
1,166 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4257 | Christian Sandoval | La noche de los muertos vivientes | 5 | 5 | muchocine | This film is one of those found in that select group of films screening required for all those lovers of cinema. and it represents a direct influence for a number of filmmakers who include John Carpenter, Sam Raimi, among others. | "The night of the living dead" (1968), is the first film by American director George Romero, which is considered a true classic of the genre of horror, which quickly became a cult film. The script was in charge of the same Romero in collaboration with John a. Russo, and is based on the novel "I am Legend", by writer Richard Matheson. Barbara (Judith O´Dea) and his brother decide to go to visit the grave of his father in a remote forest, but there they are attacked by a stranger. Barbara survives and manages to escape in his car to a nearby farm, where it is inside, is a partially mutilated body. While running frightened, he meets a man who explains to him that a group of strangers is attacking without apparent meaning people. Now they are surrounded by these strangers, so it will have to do our utmost to survive this macabre situation.George Romero began his career making short films and some commercial for "The Latent Image", a company that had been founded by John a. Russo and Russell Streiner. The trio eventually bored of making this kind of productions, and they decided to make an horror film. Based on the novel by Richard Matheson and other films of zombies, formed the script for his first tape about undead, for which got $114,000 dollars, through "Image Ten", producer who founded along with its two previous partners, more Karl Hardman and Marilyn Eastman.Obviamente due to the low budget that included, knew in advance it was quite complicated to make a film at the height of the classics of the genre with the the filmmakers had gone.In attempts to reduce costs, Romero had no choice that filmed the movie in black and white. This decision eventually gave good fruit at the level of criticism, since it provides a feature documentary type film, which denounces a kind of loss of social stability. Furthermore, the fact that this filmed in black and white gives a special charm, reinforcing the idea that we are dealing with a true classic. The counterpart of this decision, however, was that this represented serious problems to Romero and company, to find a study that would distribute the film. Columbia Pictures was the only firm interested in distributing the tape, but ended up rejecting the idea, because the film in black and white would disadvantage with the new TVs to color that existed in the market. The American International Pictures (AIP) also consider to distribute the film, but wanted that Romero shot another final and set more love scenes. Finally, the distribution ended her performing the "Walter Reade Organization", which changed the name of the tape of "Night of the Flesh Eaters" to "The night of the living dead".The construction of the script went through three phases. Initially, under the name of "Monster Flick", the film was a combination of horror with comedy, which told the story of a young aliens who visited Earth and made friends of some human teenagers. The second model of the script was the story of a young man having fled home, discovered that some corpses of people are being used as food plants by some aliens. The final script that was practically written entirely by Romero, already relates how some human corpses reanimated, feed on the flesh of the living.In an interview, Romero relates how this idea that a principle was a three-part short story, ended up giving place to this film and its two sequels which are: "Dawn of the dead" (1978) and "The day of the dead" (1985).Many people tend to emphasize the alleged socio-cultural background that has this tape, which is seen as a kind of direct criticism against racism. The fact that the protagonist of the film is an African American, played by the actor Duane Jones, in an era that racism was more latent than never, was a very risky move by Romero. Moreover, not content with this, the rest of the characters (they are all white) are pretty badly unemployed. The director leaves women as true hysterical, that do not contribute much to the defence of the House in which they are detained, but that rather they become a burden which makes more difficult things. Worse still is the character of Harry Cooper, played by Karl Hardman, who is outright racist, as well as being a rather selfish and coward, person which little cares about the future of the rest of his teammates in order to save his own skin. Despite all this, Romero has said on several occasions that the choice of Duane Jones as the protagonist, was only because he made a good casting, and not because of some kind of message against racism. Intentional or not, the message is easily percibible during the course of the film, in addition to the date of departure of the tape, coincided with the death of Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, so the parallel between the protagonist and the two men became more obvious.Much has been also the message against the capitalism that Romero has wanted to translate in his initial trilogy, is also possible to see in the fourth part of the saga "The land of the dead" (2005). Especially in the second part of the trilogy, is a critique of the consumer society, in fact the action takes place in a mall, while it seems to be the analogy between the zombie and the person average, moving to the beat of the rest of the flock, immersed in a system that leaves many real possibilities of free choice. Cannibalism represents the American Society of those years, that under such a system of competition, one can fall into attitudes, that for us to succeed, we must sink or "devour" which is beside our. That message is easily transportable to today's society, where the United States is the largest existing "Cannibal" today.The director has been argued sometimes that a film without a message, is not a film that worth.The tape was received quite varied form by critics that rejected by its effects sequences and gore cannibalism, while on the other hand, is praised as groundbreaking film, which was recognized by several critics as an immediate classic. During the course of the years, also the criticism that makes the film to American Society of the 1960s, stressing in particular the criticism towards the Government and both internal and external policies has praised.The film represents a direct influence for a number of filmmakers who include John Carpenter, Sam Raimi, among others. In 1999 the film was named as "significant culturally" by the library of Congress of the United States and was selected for preservation in the national register of films. Furthermore, also received recognition from the "American Film Institute", which placed it at place 93, in the list of the 100 greatest film of all time, produced in its hundredth anniversary.All the reasons given in this article give to understand that this tape is one of those found in that select group of films screening required for all those lovers of cinema. |
1,167 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/752 | Mario | Gojira (Godzilla) | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A classic of the fantasy film that has generated countless sequels and which should be recommended with contraindications. Need a good predisposition to seedy entertainment and fun without complexes. | August 1945: the most dramatic war episode the planet Earth has ever known is about to conclude. In the West, Germany had capitulated to the thrust of Soviets and allies, but in the East, the Empire of the rising sun was reluctant to sign the surrender. Emperor Hirohito still aspired to a treaty that does not deshonrara his people against the all-powerful American war machine. On the other hand, the United States of America were not willing to grant nor a day effort more than war. On August 6, 1945 drops the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, three days later another artifact does in Nagasaki. At that time, the world learned to where can human perfidy, and which is the power of destruction that it possesses. Japan would be marked by these events forever, and Godzilla is a good proof of that.Almost a decade later, director Ishirō Honda wore to the big screen the story of a Jurassic creature awakened in the 20th century, by the virulence of nuclear testing. The huge reptile (then not be spent about dinosaurs were precursors of birds) radioactivity it emanated through all the pores and, even, had developed a nuclear breath with immense destructive power. The monster, angered by the belligerent human activity, step on firm ground sweeping everything he gets ahead. While the human protagonists of the film discussed which would be the most appropriate course of action.On the one hand eminent paleontologist Dr. Yamane is opposed to the destruction of the shabby, arguing that its scientific study would be more useful to humanity. The rest of the country who, horrified, sees no way of destroying the grotesque animal would be opposed to it. Even his daughter will end up asking for help to the young Dr. Serizawa, creator of a new deadly weapon.The message of the tape is clear. Dr. Serizawa has discovered the desoxigenador of water, a tool which, through a completely implausible chemical process in which cut off the oxygen from the water do?, is capable of ending lifetime bathed in aqueous fluid where is immersed. Despite pressure from his friends the doctor refuses in resounding using the artifact against Godzilla, eventually ceding to the terrible disaster generated by the creature. His regret for having discovered a weapon of mass destruction in the hands of men could lead to unimaginable misfortunes, takes you to burn all evidence of his research and, ultimately, to ending the last container of such knowledge.Thus the film opts on one side, to the historical question of whether scientists who discovered nuclear fission had or not responsibility for the genocide of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. According to this version every man is responsible for his actions and should be required to amend them, even if the life in this.The destruction of Tokyo to paw, teeth, tail and radioactive breath by Godzilla is also very significant. In a time of war, in which Japan trying to escape from the crisis caused by the World War II, the razed city conjured up the miseries of the conflict and the nonsense about the misfortunes that it generated.Transferred to the screen with an excellent commissioning scene at frenetic pace (even from the current point of view) and with spectacular special effects for the time. The festival of fire models and toy car that burst, is delusional. The scenes of disaster do not have to envy nothing to which we currently see in our cinemas. Is notable the sequence in which Godzilla topples a tower from which several journalists taking pictures, as the bug approached, one of them live tells what is happening?The monster is directed towards us? Do not have escape? It's horrible, increasingly is closer? We are going to die! He is shaking the tower this is the end! Farewell to everyone? Good bye!?The film is a continuous reference to the classic King Kong (1933) Hollywood, despite the fact that on this occasion the stop-motion should be replaced by a simple costume and, apparently, it is also influenced by other American productions of the time. It's funny as, despite the implicit criticism of the USA, along the footage we see strong foreign influence in the post-war Japan, either in the clothing of the characters, in vehicles that used or directly, in the way of making films, which set his gaze at their old enemies.Ultimately, Godzilla is already a classic of fantasy films that has generated countless sequels to each more pajera, and which should be recommended with contraindications. Need a good predisposition to seedy entertainment and fun without complexes; from there, perhaps beyond of the Fireworks, you can glimpse an extraordinary movie. |
1,168 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3448 | Tito Chinchan | Las crónicas de Riddick | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Second installment of the muscular Riddick, that nothing less is assigned the task of saving the universe alone. Lastra Le it the length, but is a type of film with an audience of wide spectrum of a handles which kills and gracietas. | Director: David TwohyDuración: more than 2 hours, which was the Court of the director.Does premiere: August 24, 2004.Espectadores: 873.743 humanos.¿Quieres beings see Mr Diesel with a wig as the Melendi (with less alcohol in the blood)? Because clearly this is your movie. Too bad you have this waiter greñas, after meeting him always as the ass of a baby. By the way, I have a fellow in the Corral, the Spartan little, that looks quite like this type. I'm ask him to see if he is the son of Vin and I contracted for the next film. Who knows.The film is a guy with the eyes with cataract and stronger than vinegar which is retired on a distant planet. A good day they chase him about mercenaries, who want him to capture by a kind pays a bestiality by him. So after dispatching them with the tip of the Dick, he decides to go see such that both pays, to see if it is he owes money or what tripe has been broken. When he arrives there, the nocróferos, also arrive to destroy the planet, Galaxy, and the universe, for those rare reasons that have the powerful before shouting muahahahaha plan malevolent laughter.The alleged sequel comes after the origininal and surprising Pitch Black and we very disappointed. For starters, it is second delivery by the protagonist and an actor is the same, as if it could not be independent films. Totally. I I expect a continuation of the action of the first, but nothing at all. The strong point of the film are the decorations and in minor part wardrobe, you I has a medieval touch - space very curious. The trouble is that the action is tad erratic, the slightly loose plot and the result much longer than necessary.In short, second installment of the muscular Riddick, that nothing less is assigned the task of saving the universe alone. Lastra Le it the length, but is a type of film with an audience of wide spectrum of a handles which kills and gracietas. Quite acceptable.You lose much freshness of the original, but WINS effects.Besitos.P.D: The scene of the cup of tea is very good.Pd2: Gives equal what planet you are, will always be human.P.D.3: For those that you are interested in this information, my medium Zucchini fell asleep twice, different. Obviously, I've seen twice, for a change, heh, heh. |
1,169 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3450 | Rafa Ferrer | Leones por Corderos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Promises much more, it becomes much less, although if planting some foundations for what could be the political cinema of this Millennium. | Thanks to a draw in which only took part I, and only I won I (thanks Miles & Mary to 50% than good is that read me) went to see this movie, honestly, expected with some impatience and, once again, after viewing, I left quite cold, and it is that, after the promising start of the same, Reford, only get gently scratching the surface of the conflicta conflict that USA should begin to assume as "lost" and, like Viet Nam in his time, not be the bloody navel of the world, and see, although with some disappointment, as sometimes go with the Superman S to the chest, only happens in the movies.After this mini-reflexión, in a loud voice; those who know me (and here I'm going to support something that Mary told me yesterday), you know that I am very little friend of controversial and perhaps, I am the person in the world that least appears to be what I am, or think as I think, but my almost 31 spring is a little late to change right? And is that, (and I know I repeat myself), Reford tape, apply all possible clichés of the story, exaggerated at times, and boring in others (e.g. the character of Cruise comes to cause yawning in the audience), and removing a couple of details (the role of the soldiers) and all texts from the film appear in Castilian (blessed mounts)(, hopefully this repeated in the film from this film.), the rest of the tape, although excellently well designed stays in a bland experiment that could have been a little better, but it seems that, as said Valdano, someone has felt in the film "stage fright".It is a pity that a cast so compact, solidly built, and brought under the baton of Robert r. Miss those clichés, I said earlier and that, when it seems that one goes into a diatribe about the Iraq war and this battalion of interests created by Tito Bush and his henchmen, the tape, it slowed down both drythat ends up leaving the stupefied and gaping spectators in the audience.In short, promises much more, it becomes much less, although if planting some foundations for what could be the political cinema of this Millennium. |
1,170 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4097 | Natalia Eseverri | Los Crímenes de Oxford | 2 | 5 | muchocine | When someone wants to be out of what normally makes, you must first make sure that it is a good project. | The basis of a good film is in the script. That is an obvious axiom to every director and cinema connoisseur. Everything else, actors, pictures, mounting. they are additions that make the film to be perfect and that the message you want to convey through the script, is clear and spectacular.That is the failure of the Oxford murders, by very good direction employing by Álex de la Iglesia, imitating his admired Hitchcock in a blatant manner but which makes it a nice tribute, and for many good performances that have, part of the basis of a novel very loose, in which topical characters drift what could be a good story and it is an overwhelming disappointment.Many writers believe that the public can only be you won presentandole a few initial theories of some formulas to solve, that they are happening until you reach the final climax, where everything is resolved and after mislead the viewer with twenty thousand suspects, at the end the culprit was in front of your nose. And it may be true, but even so, this story must have a hook and an attractive pursuit, and above all a spectacular ending that leaves you no indifferent.Explanations of because these crimes were seemed loose, topical characters as the girl in love with the protagonist that is frustrate not get it or the vengeful student went unheeded by Professor star and drowns his sorrows in alcohol, are mere insignificant forgetfulness that add nothing and damage history in general, because you misleads but not to have a logical consequenceto resolve the film raised. That if, technically it is a lujazo of film, and interpretations of each of them are book, but without a good material behind, this is left empty and vain.I hope the Lord of the Church, going by his comic and ironic vein of the community or crime ferpecto, that there really wears their true stories and know very good advantage. |
1,171 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2101 | JLO | Oldboy | 5 | 5 | muchocine | My assessment of Oldboy would be from very good to excellent, something like as 9 points. Perhaps its final part is more melodramatic of the aconsejabale - to be perfect - but we will not be so stringent. | Indeed, the assessment of Oldboy would be from very good to excellent, something as 9 points. Perhaps its final part is more melodramatic of the aconsejabale - to be perfect - but we will not be so stringent. Oldboy is another example that when Asians want to, make another film has no raison d ' être. The script is impeccable at the beginning, with the capture of a man imprisoned for 15 years and without any kind of explanation, and then his release, nor any uninformed. The Assembly, the ellipsis, everything of a taste for economic of forms, without forgetting the beauty of the images. Oldboy (2003) awarded in Cannes, is the jamóm of a trilogy begun earlier by Sympathy For Mr. Vengeance (2002) and ending in Sympathy for Lady Vengueance (2005), all watered the same aesthetic violence, pain of loss, in a rare mood - dropper- and as their titles indicate, full and trouts revenge stories. Adaptation of a manga of cult (Yes!, another comics movie!), the Korean director Park Chan-wook florea own making style, both by theme. Scares their excessive fame of violence is not such, but Aa all lights Oldboy is unmissable. |
1,172 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2517 | JLO | Cuestión de pelotas | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Dodgeball is recommended on dvd for a Sunday afternoon. Just to see fast today and forget tomorrow. | Dodgeball ("ball game" on Argentina and only dvd) has each and every condiment of the current American Comedy: entertaining and light, endearing characters and too many stereotyped? and to generally poorly delineated - couples and ultimately actions: redondita and vacuous. Here is also the eternal fight between good and evil in a parody, which ultimately fails to conform to no one.An almost non-existent script which is pure pretext for cataract of jokes and funny situations (only of a times) but the brief cameo of Hank Azaria, William Shatner, David Hasselhoff and Chuck Norris troop only more grace. Everything else is a right direction of Thurber because it becomes almost invisible, the surprise with the hard Vince Vaughn in a role voorkeur in his career and a long, and sustained pace all together sounds like too little by the expectation and the cast.But the big problem of Dodgeball is the noticeable hiccup of Ben Stiller, in charge of the first great overacting of his career, out of tune, which stand out as one of the best comedians of the time. A rather boring character machietta and pulling heavy. Dodgeball is recommended on dvd for a Sunday afternoon. Just to see fast today and forget tomorrow. |
1,173 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3634 | Raccord | Una verdad incómoda | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A conference with a power point quite cumbersome, which is more sparing in ideas and with many more simplifications that a book of?Sciences of the Earth and the environment? of 2nd of Bachillerato. | A conference with a power point quite cumbersome, which is more sparing in ideas and with many more simplifications that a book of "Sciences of the Earth and environment" of 2º de Bachillerato. There is nothing new, nothing unknown or the attention of which was already reported previously; friend Al Gore brings nothing more than his relative charisma, to another on scientific consensus that has existed for 20 years.And it seems that everything in the documentary, and everything that has arisen around him a Marketing campaign. That I know (and anyone who see the extras of the DVD can check) Al Gore, has zero film knowledge (and until few years ago nor environmental, that he refused to us to sign the Kyoto Protocol when he was Vice President) so it is highly unlikely that either his film. It is rather a documentary about himself. What then that this impoverished documentary has become so famous? We are in full crisis of the Bush administration, there is no politically correct leaders (Kofi Annan and Nelson Mandela seems that they are retired and the Dalai Lama is no longer what it was since that is colegui of Sanchez Drago) and above all and most importantly, Bono desperately needs someone with whom make a picture. The cause of solidarity with Africa seems to last fashionable, and consciences bienpensantes need new ideas to "make this world a better place". It was logical that a documentary like this (as insufficient and so bottoms complacent with the powerful) struck in Princes of Asturias, Nobel and other raffles.And with this, Al Gore get a job of environmentalist lecturer around the world, becoming everyone's money and travelling in his private jet, which does not work precisely with solar panels. The lead by example, it seems that Che Guevara died with (cli). |
1,174 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4172 | Silvia Giner | Beowulf 3D | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Absolutely if it is worth going to see this movie in 3D. The effects are very well made and it is fun to enjoy them. You'll spend a while different and far from the typical bad film in 3D, this is different. | Absolutely if it is worth going to see this movie in 3D. The effects are very well made and it is fun to enjoy them. You'll spend a while different and far from the typical bad film in 3D, this is different. I recommend that you go to see the Kinepolis cinemas (which you can) or at least to a room that is enabled with THX (champion) and digital reproduction, that this is the best form to see a film in high definition. If you are going to a movie (and it is not the day of the premiere) coil will be reporducido already so many times that the quality will be significantly less.Beowulf is a hero of the eponymous Anglo-Saxon epic poem, which was written in old English alliterative verse. Its importance is comparable to the of the Nibelungenlied, Cantar de mío Cid, the song of Roland or Lebor Gabála Érenn. It has two major parts: the first occurs during the youth of Beowulf, and tells how comes to the aid of the Danes or Jutes, who suffered the attacks of a giant (Grendel), and after killing him, confronts his mother; in the second part Beowulf is already the King of the Geats and fight to death with a dragon.And in this fantastic adaptation to the big screen by hand of director Robert Zemeckis have a digitized Ray Winstone as "oh my God is good" making of Beowulf and which we will be able enjoy soon in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Another that has been digitized is the beautiful Angelina Jolie, which have given a few pounds more and unsa very successful curves that make digital model a genuine esc ultura far removed from the original model closest to the chupachúps look.They have already long us than the actors we are condemned to disappear and be replaced by digital, much cheaper and less gourmet than flesh and bone models, I had my doubts but after seeing BeoWulf I think I begin to worry. |
1,175 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/585 | Matías Cobo | El laberinto del fauno | 5 | 5 | muchocine | One of the best Spanish films in which del Toro is revealed as a narrator able to combine in the same story, the magic of the Fables and most horrible of the human condition. | He knew the facet of Guillermo del Toro as strong an action-horror film director that always permeates his particular and imaginative vision. But this magnificent film, that advance, is one of the best produced this year by the Spanish film, I found a great Narrator capable of bringing together, in the same story, the magic of the Fables and most horrible of the human condition. El laberinto del fauno is a film so atypical as bold in its dual narrative proposal. If the monsters of tale Ophelia (magnificent Ivana Baquero) is facing in his adventures are terrifying, not less so are some of human beings with whom person in a hostile reality. His mother Carmen (Ariadna Gil) tells him that it is more to so much "zarandaja", but she clings strongly to his personal universe, to the point of living almost abstracted from the ungrateful cotidianediad. Beat with commendable value tougher tests for his fable while living with dread new developments surrounding his life, his mother and his yet unborn brother.The use of imagination as escape from the most shocking reality, therefore, is one of the proposed issues by del Toro, who suffered the cruelest side of life firsthand during the abduction of his father. The film puts US in the coinciding with World War II post-war Spain. It is 1944 and there are still pockets of Republican troops, known as 'maquis', refugees in the mountains fighting against the Pro-Franco army. A splendid Sergi López put face to the despiado Captain Vidal, who command a few troops aimed at ending the Group of insurgents wagered on the slopes of the mountain. Carmen is a tailor's widow and the mother of Ophelia, a 13 year old girl addicted to fantastic tales. As a means of survival, Carmen married remarried capitál Vidal, who seems only interested in the welfare of the child which Carmen carries in her womb and is about to be born. And treated with contempt his wife and stepdaughter, sentenced to treat him slavishly to deal with these years of national famine and famine. Both travel to the mill where Vidal has its center of operations. There, Mercedes (large Maribel Verdú) directs the service of the House and the Doctor (Alex Angulo) takes care of the health status of Carmen, recently arrived after a long and hard journey along with Ofelia.Ofelia, alien to the ruthless hunt for Vidal (the interpretation of Lopez is the height, for example, of Ralph Fiennes in Schindler's list made of the sadistic Amon Goeth)You will discover the ruins of a maze in the forest. There you are with a Faun who recognizes it as a Princess. Although disbelieving at first, she agrees to face the three tests which returned it to his reign. It will run all sorts of dangers, but none aterrará you both his padastro and the dark world it represents. The State of health of Carmen is compounded as approaching birth and she is trapped between duty to attend to his mother and the evidence to be complete when the full moon arrives.Grim aesthetic and sometimes repulsive, El laberinto del fauno isn't a film the Chronicles of Narnia-style, despite having fauns and fairies in its history. Extreme violence shown or suggested by the ellipsis in the real story, as well as the aterrodora setting of the dream-like part, prevent that this is suitable for a child audience tape. But it is highly recommended for the rest.The Ribbon, its corollary, vindica the world of the imagiación and dreams as an antidote to the worst face of reality. Del Toro, here, it is almost a declaration of principles on his own vision of life. According to the Mexican, literature, film, or other art forms can facilitate us access to so exhilarating world, but, as noted in the tape, it will only be open to those who know to look. Why, maybe need to look through the eyes of a child. |
1,176 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4303 | Jaime Martínez | Donnie Darko | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Sobrevaloradísima excentridad wrapped in the form of mystery and psychological drama. All the enigma that appears at the beginning goes to deaf ears, losing all the suggestive and stimulating that was. | Sobrevaloradísima excentridad wrapped in the form of mystery and psychological drama. Is true that starts well, start very well, but little by little and measure that go is diluted so inscrutable to wanting to cover more topics which in truth can withstand the Richard Kelly film. To begin with, we have a mysterious and disturbed Jake Gyllenhaal (not hit anything) as the protagonist of the story; becoming pass through teenager Institute with twenty or so years. But that is not the best of all, it is best that attention! Drew Barrymore (Drew, you are almost on the same level as Sandra Bullock on my black list; have been the charming girl from ET?) makes her teacher! By God, if it may have him older than her in real life. At the moment a 0 for responsible for casting. Returning to the film, seems that you want to boot, hook the Viewer, hypnotize by the mystery that surrounds it, but everything remains in an I want to and I can not. Really want it to work, but fails. All the enigma that appears at the beginning goes to deaf ears, losing all the suggestive and stimulating that was. He wants to be independent cinema and at the same time attract the youth audience with the story of the problematic teenager in the typical American people. This is all very touched, so strain you of travel time, and go; We have movie. Not me so I swallow. Apart from all this, the pace is tedious and slow in equal parts, with scenes without sense (Smurfs) and amount of resources that lead to nowhere (scenes and Assembly with rate 100% videoclipero) and that fill in only minutes of footage. Let's go now to the good stuff. The interpretation of Gyllenhaal is elite and interesting. Empatizas quite well with his character, but do not know that it is what is happening. The music is great, fits perfectly in the "roll" that brings the movie. The initial idea is good, but as I said, is diluted as it progresses. He wants to play many existential and philosophical issues, and at the end just to not complete in depth none of them. The "evil rabbit" is impressive. For me, the best of the film by far. Manages to reflect the anguish and confusion he feels the protagonist. Everytime it appears the film manages to be real scary. Bravo for the people of design. Anyway, which part of a good premise but stays in a simple intent. The end is coming from far away, a little more than originality Sr.Kelly. The conversation of the Smurfs, smurfette and the sexuality that was intended to? Please, leave the job of absurd talks to the genius of Tarantino, and focus on his film; the public will thank you. Anyway, I do not know, found it me too pretentious in some moments, and especially in the last few minutes. Of subject matter similar to the great trapped in time, and the suggestive the butterfly effect. Certainly for me, it is the third of the three. Ultimately, sobrevaloradísima place at the tail. |
1,177 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3326 | Estesoyo | 300 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | 300 is a movie or a comic book? Difficult question by Jove. It seems a living crèche, with a lot of figurines that move from pose to pose. But what is no doubt is a truño more in this endless list... | The film is based on a comic book by Frank Miller, which neither reached me impact too. The most interesting was the presentation, in the form of book in hardcover and in landscape format, and as it is usual from his era Sin City, in glorious black and white. The most famous battle of the Greek Spartans, with certain historical mistakes that we can forgive for what licenses artistic and narrative tells us. but in the end, it isn't more than a comic book that there is a battle. It does not for more.Already from the outset depends on where they come: or you read the comic book or not. If have you read already you know what you'll find, and all you can say is whether it is true or not, and if you have not read. therefore do not uncle, because the film follows the comic book cartoon to cartoon. This reminds me of the Akira film. This film was accurate to the comic, but the good thing that I had was that two hours of film were equivalent to a hundred volumes, with what it cost then (and now I suppose) in time and money. Without any added value.And this is what happens to the movie '300'. It adds nothing to the comic. I even think that it cost me less read the comic book who see the movie. An alluring comic leave you a film of the lot. It is totally unnecessary. It is to see a boring video clip of a song: If you already liked you'll not like more and if not, then spend everything.It is incomprehensible to me as it has been able to wake up so many passions. It is nothing more than comic in movement, and with the same licenses that allow you to a comic: e.g. scene gore of the handles of the Leonidas dismemberment to the enemy left in the film, the characters are deformed in physiognomy both factions in their eagerness to resemble the comic book fighting are spectacular but unrealistic, enemies are stupid ass. The charm that might turn out to have the comic is lost to take him to the big screen.And the best are the dialogues. that if I can not kneel because it hurts the back of slaughtering your soldiers. that if we are fighting for freedom. I thought they were going to fall pro-American pamphlets of the sky. am not a historian, and not be if it really could be to say something like, but by God! they could have been otherwise! It so much that I almost have to leave the cinema with the aching ears thumping.History may impact especially to the American public accustomed to the vapid biographies of its nobel and his boring wars (that if against Indians or against themselves). But European history has many more stories and much more shocking than this. Now if you do not read anything and you think everything you said television, because you will hallucinate uncle.At least it is better than the adaptation of Sin City, I have no strength to see again. and that luckily I almost managed to forget already. But this only means that still need bad it could get worse.The director, Zack Snyde, becoming a specialist in shoot exactly as you are told. A mandate going. It has made the remake of 'The dawn of the dead', stuck to the original and now '300' nailed to the original. They can catch it for the remake of 'The orphanage', those who liked them continue liking because hara exactly the same.The actors will make me extremely boring, especially the Butler with the number of faces in the movie.So little more can tell you. initially not even her I liked to make a criticism, it was seeing her and forget her. I lost many hours watching film of shit not me inmuto. |
1,178 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/332 | Tito Chinchan | El erótico enmascarado | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The caspómetro low hours. More Pajares and less Estesos. | The film is about Manolo (student of mismísmo Fraga), a Professor of social sciences which will be promoted to a Ministry. It has several problems the cheerful teacher, given that is bundled with the daughter of the Minister, the youth was porn actor (tremendous tool, by the way) and currently has a problem of "virility". Therefore resorted to an eminent psychiatrist (Ozores) that will cure this lack of erections. On the one hand, the psychiatrist wants to divorce his wife while that haunts him a gay. On the other hand, they want to unseat this post Manolo, barbets details in his dark past. Come on, art and essay that they say.Juanito Navarro Senator Fernando Esteso erotic, Ozores psychiatrist, Maria Isbert, Chus Lampreade, etc, is that does not lack detail. The film itself is a tremendous firecracker, because, unlike others, it has too many gracietas. Although it has its dotted in some respects. It has nipples nipple jumping defying the laws of gravity, which faithfully reflect sexual freedom and the joy of the happy 1980s. It has subtle gracietas on the volatility of certain politicians, with their continuous changes of jacket and ideologies. It has its mess and it comedy, but it does not exceed. Well, a bit of science fiction there, and is that after watching fuck Ozores and Esteso one believes that it is possible to Dodge bullets or walk by the waters.In short, another one of the "Ozoril" genre, did not finish like me, although paraphrasing a very famous King "A naked well worth seeing the film" well, actually said Paris is well worth a mass, in relation to its passage to Christianity more recalcitrant about the Crown of France, but basically I wanted to say that, certainly.The caspómetro low hours. More Pajares and less Estesos.P.D: "is why remember me this Ayatollah Khomeini?", says Esteso before the mat of his girlfriend, so, without laughing or anything.Pd2: Fuck that grotesque of male bodies. That difference with the metrosexual being now.P.D.3: Intimate scene Ozores as a psychiatrist in his underwear to the annals of the history of the cinema.P.D.4: "Rooooojaaaaaa, when your rooooojaaaaaa you've done to you?"P.D.5: "I am less macho than Estíbaliz" large phrases for posterity. |
1,179 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/387 | Rafa Ferrer | United 93 | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A tape anthology, essential and get what he wants, without a doubt, delve into the consciousness of the Viewer. The silence of the patio of armchairs so made it clear. | When the film ends one stays silent, crestfallen and pensive, while the melt in black that ends the film by Paul Greengrass, seems to penetrate up to your temples, and is that the 11-S fatidico of the year 2001 change something for everyone, and as I read out there, all lost something, (as lost in my city the 11-M).The film mixes with master a drama, a thriller and a documentary, shaken and not blended, as said James Bond; Greengrass composed a tape where we see the characters not as heroes, but like any normal person, indeed, like one of us in that position; It makes us also us feel part of that flight, which suffer with what you feel in the air control, or decisions that were carried out that day.The actors, all unknown, in fact many of them are interpreted to themselves (go, are the "protagonists" of what happened), a script with scraps of history and much improvisation, and a history that, even knowing the end keeps you glued to the seat, a tape anthology, essential and who gets what he wants, without a doubt, delve into the consciousness of the Viewer.The silence of the patio of armchairs so made it clear. |
1,180 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/508 | Torbe | Alatriste | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The movie begins with all players sunk in a pond, and that premonicion more clear of what he was going to see... | If I went to see the movie in the cinema, which I don't hardly ever unless you are ready to see winning horse, i.e., any movie of interest general or that you have said many people that is sublime.If lei the first book of Alatriste of the Grump of Perez Reverte, a writer than not I just catch at all but it's an I jarto and so cool. The book was not evil, aventurillas and such. Jure read the second but the pornete and the life crazy that I has not allowed me to return to pages of this capitan to lived a time with a great attraction for me, I am passionate about all this cycle of the Americas.Y suddenly I hear that they will make a movie about Alatriste. And you are going to lead the Diaz Yanes, a director that I met in a Seville Holy week ago a lot of years and it left me with the talking. A guy very nice and accessible, so I wish you all the luck in the world with his movie.Then I see the movie finally, accompanied by a Romanian pussy and writer David Beard and I go both the sea of curious.At the entrance, buying into fucking me to sneak an infamous fat. He tells me that they have given 2 tickets and you are 3. His movie began at 1030 and the mia at 10. And were the 10!.Tell him that if he doesn't mind to wait for it to remove my posts because this begins already, and the aunt gets it edge by saying that no, that have given wrong your entries and bla bla bla.Before his idioticia, the force. I say that it will not happen before of my. Indeed, leaves which was front and she tries to get the ringleader, but I I am goose, I interpongo as the referee that it sits between two furgolistas that are being ostiar, got my tickets, the aunt calls me Digimundo and I the say a resounding "that I forget", by not reading the card or mount a chicken, as the movie began.He began well experience Alatriste, lives Dios!.The movie begins with all players sunk in a pond, and that premonicion more clear of what he was going to see!Ostia, which movie disappointment, as I bored! DiossssY that the first time not bad, but halfway, when it appears the Ariadna Gil throughout the movie will join in boredom more absolute. Do I have nothing against this great actress, gorgeous by the way, but is that?. Diossss than sovereign pain in the ass.I when I get bored in a movie and I have a pussy on the side, start to get besucon and heavy. I spend at the premiere of the movie Pret a Porter, pain in the ass that's the Altman. Had one known to the side and the di the movie, because I super-heavy ponia trying to get her hand. Later I saw her presenting a news and could not fail to forget that night. Average projection Pobretica.en decided to buy her drink and shit to the Romanian pussy because the poor was saying that I wanted to kill, as had led to see such movie. Luck was the beard Professor because to the less could discuss the play with the. I go to the puestecillo of sweets of the film and I find Manolo Escobar! DiooooooSSSSS! Do JajajajajaLe greet and say:-man Manolo, you remember of my? Do we saw in the hotel Calderon in Barcelona (is that is that you months has I saw him to Manolo in a hotel and greet him saying that was a living myth and about my car and all that)-man, Yes, haha, man? (I recognized!)-That incredible that you see here, you saw yesterday on TV, some time ago in Barcelona and now a puestecillo of the film. "This is a sign, Manolo-(the good man is laughs and something tells me so) who knows if there is something there, who knows.""Who knows if there is something there, who knows". Big words from a great Spain. subliminal message which bears relation with the movie I'm seeing. "Who knows if there is something there, who knows". I think that in Alatriste little had. The departure of nardo with Echanove Quevedo, that this highly successful with these hairs from jevy and these gafillas than him towards the Chinese eyes, the scene of the gold of the ship and, the final battle. And of course the costumes and sets, which is where has spent the Peel.And I wonder, this is not a movie of adventures? So by that not put more rhythm? Some gag, pussy, in the movie there are no chistecillo or gracieta. I hate the movies that could get chistecillos and not put them. What's going on? That by not putting humor the movie is better?The Romanian made an odious comparison, I said that days before had seen Pirates of the Caribbean and that you had liked, and this movie instead not. The pirates has humor, rhythm, things happen and it is not as unpleasant as the of Alatriste, which do not stop kill all God in a pretty nasty way. And the role of the aunts in the movie? Os you have set? All chungas or whores. Who hates women? Reverte or Diaz Yanes? Because often seven that have made them to the female gender with this movie. And no feminist said nothing.And to finish, a special for Vigo Mortenssen mention! If Swedish seemed! Do not fuck with me! If the Spanish only is the name, Vigo!Hell, if you want the movie to seem Spanish 100%, gets a prota Spanish!. Ernesto Alterio or Antonio Resines, among others. But it looks if there are players out there. Do anyway, we live in the country of the here is everything, so queeeeeee worth? that you give ass to all! |
1,181 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2969 | Naty Buqué | La fuente de la vida | 1 | 5 | muchocine | A crappy for drug addicts with little imagination. | The fountain, Aronofsky, is about fear, the fight against and the concept of death, in a film divided into three independent diegéticamente parties, means-tested, however two of them, from the meaning, a main.Here are the reasons why this film is radically horrible, hackneyed, stupid, corny, unbearable: 1. The two minor story lines work as an allegorical representation of obvious and unnecessary that underestimates the capacity of understanding of the Viewer, that is to not only see how are repeated in the form of allegory (i.e. correspondence to one of the main elements of the central plot and these two) exactly the same meanings as in the main, but, as if it were not enough, in this same part must hear, from a scientific course, atrocities (due to its lack of verisimilitude say it) like "death is a disease like any and I can cure it" (we are going already understood that the man the death does not sit well, but they won't of say stuff). 2. Aesthetics ochentoso-futurista in one of the minor stories causes nausea. It seems that we are seeing a video clip of low-budget Daft Punk instead of an Aronofsky.3 film. The radical mixture of concepts, beliefs, religioso-filosóficas trends operating in the film as a "everything gives equal". The important thing is to oppose the Western scientism (bad bad bad) anything. Do and then put to the Mayans and a peeled meditating as good, total? the post is to accept death, else are unimportant details (which makes me doubt the seriousness of the treatment of the kabalah, which nothing know, Pi). 4. The thematic trite romanticista-antipositivista (i.e., at most, 19th century, gentlemen) anchored in a trite love tragedy, without input of any kind to any of the two clichés (except, of course, that man becomes a peeled and women in a tree in one of the three stories). 5. Several monkeys appear to have been tortured during the filming.In short, a crappy for drug addicts with little imagination. |
1,182 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/721 | Alvaro Oliva | Scoop | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is not the masterpiece of Allen, but that does not matter so that the result is a fresh, fun, comedy that fulfills its duties and that makes us to stress that we we have one of the best directors of the current panorama. | Returns the great Woody Allen, as every year, following its successful "Match Point". On this occasion occurs under the arm with "Scoop", a comedy that is a mix between "Manhattan murder mystery" and "The curse of the Jade Scorpion".The argument is quite simple: in a magic show, the great Splendini (Woody Allen) choose Sondra Pransky (Scarlett Johansson) to do a trick. During the same, the young Pransky (which is a student of journalism) appears a famous journalist, who has just died, and gives it a world first: the murderer of the tarot is Peter Lyman (Hugh Jackman).From this point Allen and Johansson become nail and meat when it comes to investigate the alleged serial killer. The director of "banana" is an expert in the comedy, and us here makes it clear that their situations, dialogues and other events we are more fun. It is appreciated that have chosen himself to embody the great Splendini, as it is a privilege to be able to see him on screen, and unfortunately in his previous films not we had been able to delight us with their presence.Again it embodies a kind of endearing with which we are identified and that you take affection in the first moments of the film. His connection with Johansson is almost perfect, and this time can enjoy the great work of the actress, very beleaguered after "The Black Dahlia", and that in these areas, and/or under the tutelage of Allen is fine and shows that apart from being pretty is good actress. "The third protagonist is Hugh Jackman, who more than anything is limited to portraying the son of one of the best English families, with the consequent game of glances and smiles of a handsome, rich and strong, type something that is not difficult to achieve.""Scoop" is not the masterpiece of Allen, but that does not matter so that the result is a fresh, fun, comedy that fulfills its duties and that makes us to stress that we we have one of the best directors of the current scene and of all time. |
1,183 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1313 | Puspus | El truco final (The Prestige) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Unfortunately for Nolan, his new show isn't at the height of his ambition and presents numerous errors that tarnished, at least partially, its final result. | Something must have happened to Christopher Nolan to interest both by the characters tormented, set to fire by the death of a loved one. Both the protagonist of "Memento" and the renovated Bruce Wayne of "Batman Begins", passing by the Police guilty of "Insomnia", all are traumatized by the murder of someone close. And this is repeated with the nineteenth-century magician it nails Hugh Jackman in this entertaining "The final trick". They are the marks of the Nolan House. As the careful photography, the leisurely pace (sometimes too), the superb direction of actors, the segmentation of the narrative "tempo". and we cannot forget that, that vocation always play with the Viewer. "The final trick" has been conceived as a gigantic, monstrous, magic number. Michael Caine, at the beginning of the tape, already warns us: "I want that you are vigilant," inviting us in this way to participate in it. And from there, starts the function. Three acts: "The presentation", where the main characters of the story, their different characters, know your goals. "The performance", in which the script tricks begin to happen is and the story revolves, turns and spins until it almost gave of face to face against the floor. And finally, "the prestige", or what is the same: the conclusion, that last great trick that should leave with their mouths open and make us break out in a tremendous ovation. Unfortunately for Nolan, his new show isn't at the height of his ambition and presents numerous errors that tarnished, at least partially, its final result. To begin with, the personalities of the two magicians in question (despite being correctly interpreted) are seen very on top. Their motivations, their paranoia, aren't me real and take away this dramatic load to the film. Second, according to the mandatory nut laps are multiplying, merman also in credibility and capacity for surprise.Bad thing this for a complicated toy that should be exciting. But the greater failure of the film, what he denied that coveted applause, he resides in its last second, in that "chis-pún" in which Chris Nolan has based much of his film. The "Prestige" of this feature entitled "The final trick" probably yes do us open the eyes of astonishment, but I am afraid that it will not anyone satisfied.It is not acceptable that a film that has kept in a realistic line throughout its extensive footage is discovered, at its peak as an absurd sci-fi fantasy. This is a trap not deserved that loads the good presentation of the set. In this regard, Nolan is a bit like the character of Hugh Jackman: lacks magic but knows how to sell his show. We will see in the second Batman. |
1,184 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/156 | Andrés | Stoned | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A script quite light with phrases such as 'the problem of the happiness is boring' | I know this is first time a fiction film recreates the Rolling Stones with this since we have reason enough to want to see it, is not it?. "Stoned" (2005) from Stephen Woolley tries to tell the "real" story of the death of Brian Jones, the founder of the band was found dead at the bottom of your pool. At first everyone thought that it was a faux leg of Jones, who spent all day drugged, but Frank Thorogood, a type who worked at his home, confessed "on his deathbed" having him killed. This is the version which takes the film.The thing sounded interesting but is a difficult challenge. To begin we have to as well known as the Stones, as characters, stars and a major episode in the mythology of the rock: the death of Jones. I.e., the public's expectations are high and I think that many feel that they have tried them to sell cat by liebre.¿Que we have here? A film about rock stars. They are so like each other! First we ask ourselves who will be sufficiently similar to so-and-so to interpret it? After: the difficult beginnings, great opportunity, the fans, drugs (essential and nearly protagonists), loss of control, decadence, Salvation or death. The End.Si well "Stoned" is not a film about the Rolling Stones, but Jones, are recreated some facts with other members of the band. Thus we can see the actors who interpret to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, both with low profile and very few lines, but you can not ask more (would have been worse, I think). The action is concentrated in the months prior to the death of Jones, his dismissal of the band and the quick collapse of drugs and in the pool.To animate the story director spices up his film with beautiful people, naked bulk, musical sequences, showy travel of LSD, i.e. all the paraphernalia of the 60s, to at least entertain the eye and ear. A script quite light with phrases such as "the problem of the happiness is boring", so try to summarize the philosophy of Jones, and some touches of documentary (newspaper, filming of the time cuts) and so you go to report something and then not you come to surprise and can answer with certainty to the question: who killed Brian Jones? |
1,185 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2105 | Antoni Messa | Premonition (Siete días) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Premonition is a new and effective return of nut on a fairly recurring theme in the current fantasy film: loops, holes and jumps in time. | The routine of this page know of my non-existent devotion by Sandra Bullock. Perhaps this is the primary reason why, until now, had not yet seen Premonition (7 days), a film of fantastic coordinates after that, unexpectedly, hides one of the most compact of the protagonist of Miss agent Especial.Realizada by German Mennan Yapo, tape is - among other things - the intention to relaunch the eclipsed figure of one of the brides of America have been faster than destronadas; a Bullock, willing to put aside his ridiculous collection of mohines, bet to give a more natural interpretation the tormented character who gives life and on which, no doubt, lies most of the weight of its plot: the central axis on which turns his well-structured screenplay. Therefore the maligned actress gets into the skin of Linda, a married woman and with two small daughters that, overnight, you will see radically change its existence when they communicated by the death of her husband because of a car accident. Inexplicable way and the next day of receiving the fatal news, her husband sunset to her vera sleeping in the same bed.Premonition is a new and effective return of nut on a fairly recurring theme in the current fantasy film: loops, holes and jumps in time. The recent (and failed) Déjà Vu or the ingenious trapped in time, are their clearest relating two, while Bill Kelly, its screenwriter, bet by approaching more directly the melodrama of tragic dyes that action or comedy, placing the tormented Linda into a nightmare without output apparent. And it is that that poor woman, who does not know for sure whether her husband is alive or dead, must fight, every day and with his immediate environment, to move from his mind a macabre and devastating ordeal which seems to have no end.The possibility of changing the future anticipation of certain well-known events, is another of the (typical) advantages that plays a film which, despite not offering big surprises along its projection, boasts a very academic narrative, visual and interpretative correction. The ease to create disturbing atmosphere and the courage to dare with The End with some nasty and not as standard as it would be presumed, recoil somewhat to this product from other works of similar characteristics. Sometimes, as evidenced in this case, the well used clichés can work perfectly. Even taking the Bullock as the protagonist.Hope is the last thing that is lost. Maybe in a few years, until Sandra Bullock becomes a good actress. At least, in this film, has been a strong commitment to change its negative image. |
1,186 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2626 | Iñaki Bilbao | Fast food nation | 3 | 5 | muchocine | In fact, it's a "small" film despite the argument and the important quantity and quality of performers involved therein. | Interesting film of Richard Linklater, always willing to put in solfa various estates, allegedly untouchables in the United States. Fast food chains, food called trash, are one of them.Linklater here, addresses the issue of pollution of burgers, from different points of view. Perhaps too, which makes the whole not round which would have been necessary.Sins of ambitious, so to speak, to the mix, perhaps because they go hand in hand especially in the border with Mexico, work in factories in preparation of the product, with the inhuman, humiliating and very hard work of Mexican immigrants working in it as cheap and silent workforce (most works without papers).The film, however, is entertaining and interesting at all times, and there are abundant good scenes and dialogues. Moments like the work in the food chain, the conversation of the Executive with the link in the factory (excellent Bruce Willis), or the last ten minutes, manifest clearly the excellence of this important film, criticism of a corrupt system that threatens public health.However, it is clear that the film is uneven, and the somewhat erratic events. The employee rate is Linklater House brand, but it makes that few, has but recognizable downtime.In addition, not all characters have the sufficient importance in the plot. None left, but there are important differences between them.In general terms, "Fast Food Nation" to spare fulfils its role, which is the State a fact which should be changed immediately. But of course that it will fail, both because it is impossible the film to change completely the public awareness of, and because it does not, for my taste, the force required. Since, in reality, he is a "small" despite the argument tape and the important quantity and quality of the performers they involved therein. |
1,187 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4226 | Ethan | En un lugar solitario | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Violence becomes more evident, the point of view of Gloria Grahame importance and alternates with the Bogart until final resolution. | The tape is one of the two masterpieces that gave the director of devotion to excellence, Nicholas Ray, Humphrey Bogart and his production company "Santana" (the other is knock on any door). It is not surprising that Gloria Grahame - one of the big black ladies on celluloid - outside the protagonist since two years before he married the filmmaker. The marriage did not last long, but was very soundly its wedding with her last husband, Anthony Ray, the son of Nicholas then. It seems that everything remained in family. In a lonely place are multiple movies in a single, hence its enormous appeal for any film buff. First is a fierce criticism of the own Hollywood: the protagonist is a bitter writer who does not hesitate to confront the producers, directors and stars throwing them on face his lack of professionalism, whether by commercial interests or by simple arribismo. Somehow can be considered an autobiographical work that the own Ray suffered theirs to bring forward their personal projects. But it is also a tape where it appears one of the favorite themes of Nicholas Ray: the difficulties of the couple (a violent Humphrey Bogart and Gloria Grahame) to live your love story in a hostile environment. In this case, the pressure of the police - who believes that Bogart is the murderer of a Chambermaid - not let this co-existence comes to good term. "I was born when me besaste." I died when you left me. "I have only experienced the few weeks that I've loved" are phrases pronounced him as her throughout the film. The situation will be repeated in later works by the same author. Thus, in Johnny Guitar, Sterling Hayden and Joan Crawford were trying to live his love in the past and at the time of the action, but the social environment, the ambition and the dark background to Johnny as a gunman, made that it is impossible to live together. The same applied them to the characters that embodied James Dean and Natalie Wood in rebel without a cause, this time the pressure exercised her own friends and family. Finally, it is interesting to note as Ray uses different points of view in the plot. Not only that of the protagonist, as it is the case in most of the classic films of the time, but that as the violence becomes more obvious, the point of view of Gloria Grahame importance and alternates with the Bogart until final resolution. And it is the actress performed one of their best performances. Away from his tumultuous marriages and of its concern for their physical appearance - filled lips to give them enhanced so that more than one ended with his mouth full of cotton after having kissed - Gloria Grahame was very serious in her work and an excellent professional that garnered major awards, including an oscar of the Academy. In a lonely place is an essential film for all film buffs in general and for the lovers of the Nicholas Ray film in particular. It is a film that can be analyzed all the elements then Ray will develop in later films; but it is also a tape to enjoy the images of the plot and. Gloria Grahame. |
1,188 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1012 | José A. Peig | Dentro del laberinto | 3 | 5 | muchocine | There are rubber puppets, but they have life, lyricism, freshness and a dimension that gives them a point more than the cliché reality. It is a full demonstration that can make poetry with a show of the Muppets. | There are films that are myths of past eras because they invoke them and we return to a State of being buried by the passage of time, but still latent. In our era, fairy tales are told in pictures. Thus we have reached the heart stories such as the Skywalker, the Goonies and the case of this Labyrinth, delicious entertainment film. In fact, it is the equivalent of Lewis Carroll (Alice in the country of wonders) films from masses. When this film came to billboards - in the eighty-six, if I am not mistaken - I would have about eight years. I left amazed cinema. It is a waste of magic and fantasy. Only films such as the adaptation of the neverending story made Petersen or return of the jedi (there, I was six years old, he won the mask of Vader.y everything else is history already) equalled her power of fascination. So, obviously, to a boy like me, belonging to the era ochentera. Today, from the prism of a different one and at more advanced ages era, do not happen to be mere films for children. However.Both films Star Wars and this production directed by Jim Henson(vaya_pérdida_prematura,_aquel_mago_de_las_marionetas) Lucasian resist the passage of time and with them I can return to the center of my innocence. And Labyrinth is not no masterpiece, but it is a marvel of design, ambience, humor, characterization of characters, music (heavenly David Bowie) and lyrical background. Not in vain, lies a love poem that floats eternally in a world governed by the Jarrett King, in love with heroin which he wanted to give the paradise of dreams for their fear and loyalty. The film is built on the myth of the labyrinth, allegory of the road to the interior of our secrets. The path of life is like a maze whose Center contains a reward. Who provides it? who will victorious in his adventure of countless dangers that leads to the city of the Goblins?. Sara retrieves his brother and found new friends. Jarret, become nocturnal bird notes distant Sara happiness through the window of your room. Jarrett returns, alone, to the Moon in search of other dreams to sell in exchange for love.Moreover, this new tale of Alice in the Wonderland country is a lesson of artisan illusionism, made with much love and vocation, demonstrating that the current infographics methods are not essential to recreate worlds fantastic and full of life. There are rubber puppets, but they have life, lyricism, freshness and a dimension that gives them a point more than the cliché reality. See Hagle or Ludo, perspire tenderness, they are endearing in their gestures. It is a full demonstration that can make poetry with a show of the Muppets.And also a demonstration that is not essential to be original to entertain. Just a product with its own personality. We have already mentioned; drink of Lewis Carroll. Also in "The wizard of Oz" and similar. But this "Labyrinth" has the personal required of a craftsman as skilled in visual and in the management of the typical profiles of a fantasy world. We remarquemos this, therefore to the nonsense of "Eragon" tale. We are not asking to "Eragon" (or any other similar products that also drink from previous and classic works) to be original, just demand a minimum of interest when it comes to revisit and/or inspired by the classics.Personality and charisma of an artist of the likes of David Bowie put the icing to a substantially child film, a joyful delight even for adults, although it has sections failed as the stupid final battle in the city of the elves, a complete anticlimax that breaks a development which, up to that point of the footage, handled, with perfect balancethe more child elements with some oniric dyes, humor, and the tension of the adventure passage, achieving a viewing stimulant for viewers of all ages. By innumerable dangers, me I have found its way to the Castle beyond the Goblin city there. |
1,189 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2591 | Rafa Ferrer | Death Proof | 2 | 5 | muchocine | While Rodriguez tape is excellent and seems to always cut on the same pattern, it hurts me say that the Tarantino (however much liked at Cannes), seems really dull, vacuous and emptiness of his filmography. | While Rodriguez tape is excellent and seems to always cut on the same pattern, it hurts me to say that the Tarantino (however much liked at Cannes), seems really dull, vacuous and emptiness of his filmography and is that much to add a new lack of rolls, as well as an excellent home to us reconcila with 70s cinema and therefore with the "Black exploitation", and even autohomenajearse in some other time, with scenes, very tarantinianas.Lost in a tape with much dialogue and little, very little action, where even though put effort and filling it with good music (to my taste with Cameron Crowe are the best "bandasondistas" from the Hollywood scene), with another cameo of himself Quentin, and where in spite of repeated both McGowan and Marley Shelton in small roles fails to entertain the Viewer.Besides, the presence of Kurt Russell as villain has little, very little entity and it seems more like a poor man without any grace, that a "bad maloso" that give us and we generate something more than a proverbial sentence since their first min. on screen, and is the film above to take long to catch a little bit of rhythm.In short, the Tarantino of the Grindhouse segment loses strength every minute that passes, disappointed, certainly after the well that one passes in the tape of Rodriguez. |
1,190 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3690 | Jeremy Fox | La Luna en Botella | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Not only we have the more risky project of the Spanish film so far this year; It is that most personal of recent times is one of the films. | Brave was the first word that came to mind when I saw the first trailer of the Moon in the bottle, a film by a director that I, in my ignorance, it had never heard at the time. Brave because the aforementioned teaser gave to understand that we live to a different tape in the Spanish scene although some questions about whether it would not be a cheater announcement left open or if it would not respond to an attempt to imitate other directors ("Delicatessen" came to mind) rather than an own vision.Now that I've seen the movie, if someone asks me what I thought to leave the screening you have to answer frankly: Grojo, you are a brave man!Because not only we have the more risky project of the Spanish film so far this year; It is that most personal of recent times is one of the films. If only for that reason, they already deserve much applause Grojo as screenwriter and director as producers who put money for that dream possible.And dreams, is precisely what is the movie. Those impossible dreams we all have. Or should I say almost everyone there in the film, as in life, who no longer dream. It is faith in the impossible, in the cosmic utopia, which moves the hearts of the protagonists of the film and which moved, I have no doubt, to Grojo to write the screenplay and fight to bring forward against all odds. Dreams must be pursued them and no matter the amount of times and ways that tell you "NO", because sometimes only occasionally, the stars are placed in a row, the miracle occurs and you hear a redemptive and final "Yes".At this point already you you may have noticed that is a film by and for dreamers. Therein lies its strength and hence, in part, also its weakness. Because the tape has a dot of innocence that is appreciated in times they run but that, at the time, can move her from certain types of public more given to "realism". The film is Yes, innocent because innocent is dream in a world which strives to topple utopias every day. If you are not willing to believe in the impossible you should not see this film.Unfortunately the tape is not perfect. I think it would have needed more spending when it comes to filming because I have the feeling that there are ideas that have been in the dark and others that have not been all the well that could have had more time/money. Of course, money in the promotion has been missing but that, in addition to endemic Spanish film is also due to the economic problems of Sogecine currently.Nor I am convinced all the resolution of the story of Rossignol (Dominique Pinon) and his two comrades. I could not explain it but despite seem to me a good ending, there is something in the gear that I finished fit. Speaking of late, also of the history of Zeta (Edu Soto) is for me something rushed and helpings.Edu Soto is in fact, one of the things that I do not like because, although their factions fit with the character and follow to his personality, his interpretation does not convince me and seems loose most of the function. I do not know if it is by him or not but its history with Alicia (Bárbara Goenaga) is somewhat ñoña, but to me I won't be annoying.On the other hand the actors are good and especially the side as Leigh Zimmerman (Irene), who sings a beautiful song, Michael Jenn (Kurt), Federico Luppi (Rubén Cumplido), Usun Yoon (Michelle) or a Dominique Pinon which is especially brilliant.I also like and, above all, amuses me the vision of art and famous artists offered the tape. Details malicious as of the profession of the protagonist (writes great books that have signed authors famous and uninspired) or the artist who makes a giant egg for a city square and wondered if he should not have done a cube but if something would remind you of the film, in addition to its beautiful and utopian history and the tremendous courage to have brought forward a project like thisIt is its visual brilliance and their ability to create a personal world in which Grojo manages to convince us that everything is possible and that maybe, someday, we also can put the Moon in a bottle.Final rating: 7 out of 10. |
1,191 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1677 | Yojimbo | Concursante | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Rodrigo Cortes, who seems delighted to have been known, us tide and fool with a varied but not excessively original visual style. | His short film 15 days, an interesting account of a "survivor" of modern society, was a good range and a very elaborate letter for the next step: the film. However, for all those with this short film we knew and we also admire other directors, this debut has become disappointing.Circus Martín Martín (own by Medem names game), is the largest prize winner in a game show. However this stroke of luck will turn against him in the most unexpected way.A premise as this could give much game. However, Rodrigo Cortes, who seems delighted to have been known, us tide and fool with a varied but not excessively original visual style.All those who appreciate the work and style of Tony Scott and Oliver Stone can be seen in this film his long shadow: Assembly, mixture of image styles (from effects for film 8 mm up to animated pictures through chained) and verbiage that, in this case, does not define the character and takes forward the story. Ah! History, of course. Because although the history can be summarized briefly, what more doubts I causes of this film is the message that the director and screenwriter wants to give: do we live in a society of penpusher? is having a stroke of luck bad? is being rich a curse? There is way to change nothing of what surrounds us no? I think that one of the questions only has an easy answer.Seeing the end of the film gives the impression of you want to have a drama with comedic moments. You want to do cry by a character that we do not know whether it is avaricioso or simply Economist.In short, a film which aims to give a masterful lesson in how screwed we are in capitalism but with a protagonist (Sbaraglia) who can not take it. |
1,192 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2425 | Francisco Bellón | Yo | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I is a film that will lift passions among the spectators who see, and offers a good range of questions, reflections and readings that will vary depending on the eye that judges. | For several years is fashion the term independent film, which includes all those movies theoretically carried out without the support of the big studios. A so vague but at the same time as inclusive definition which is quite snobbish. And if still entails certain logical talk about United States independent film, talk about Spain independent film is absurd. For there is independence of industry, first there must be the industry as tal. when a film crossing the threshold between originality and innovation and delves into strange and incomprehensible? Perhaps the difference is only situated in a film can win in various film festivals in which to compete. For example, when David Lynch at the Cannes Festival presented his then-latest work, Mulholland Drive, the first question asked in the press conference was but what is Mulholland Drive? The directorial debut of Rafa Cortés, I, has got something similar. It's a really strange story that has no feet or head. But you have been chosen as the Fipresci revelation of the year and be presented at the Cannes Festival, automatically has become a cult film, when previously it did not nor distribution. I will not leave indifferent anybody, there will be spectators to connect immediately with the proposal that raises the film, and them will have that soon they will be asking for the time. Rafa Cortés you cannot be denied their good do as director, and to deal with her debut in the film. Still lacks Polish many aspects, but it creates an atmosphere that surrounds altogether, conveying that feeling of strain and restlessness lives Hans. Nor can say nothing to the impeccable interpretation of Álex Brendemühl, screenwriter as well as protagonist.I is a film that will lift passions among the spectators who see, and offers a good range of questions, reflections and readings that will vary depending on the eye that judges. For some, cult film, for others a real waste of time. |
1,193 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4277 | Dragon negro | Monstruoso | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The idea of show special effects through an amateur camera transmits this sense of reality long lost in the film, used already as we are to any type of digital effect. | The experiment Cloverfield, consisting of narrating the destruction of New York through the camera of an amateur and under the point of view of some young people who were at full party salda very gratifying way. After so many months of bombarding us with online advertising, the film had become one of the most anticipated of the season, with all that that implies, but this time if that has been at the height of so much anticipation.We are in a farewell party of Rob going to work to Japan the next day. This prologue of the action, although it may do something long, is absolutely necessary to know the characters, their relationships and motivations, and then develop the story once started the attack. Once it begins the destruction, the film progresses at frenetic pace without barely pause.The greatest achievement of the film lies precisely in this massive destruction, the idea of show special effects through an amateur camera transmits this sense of reality long lost in the film, used as as we are to any type of digital effect, it is becoming increasingly more difficult to surprise us and make us feel that what is happening is real. Cloverfield gets that same without having to show the destruction to detail, but with sudden and recuperated, camera movements although it must also be said that there are many more effects, and very good and effective, which in principle could be expected.In the script, one almost was has resigned to accept in every movie have to be the typical love story that moves to the main character and is the central axis of the script. But it is in this case not to bother too much and if something can reproach is as predictable as a dull finish. Cloverfield is a great movie, leaves you stuck to the seat thanks to his stunning images, and even tell us the same story of sacrifice staff in search of true love, at least is told dramatically and manages to achieve that this destruction is taken very seriously. That Yes, go prepared to film because the feeling of dizziness during the film there is no who remove you the. |
1,194 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/558 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | World Trade Center | 2 | 5 | muchocine | And may have been an explicit and tough film, it is a friendly and minimalist vision of an act that has positioned itself, by sad merits in the patriotic landmark in recent American history. | Best of the last film of the controversial Oliver Stone is that it doesn't have a film by Oliver Stone and moves it away from any possibility of that can link it with the controversy. Isn't the American oven for rolls and the wound of the 11-s is still open, and gangrenando, in their own way, the geopolitics this nebulous concept of game of chess between rulers where one wrong move piece can cause a cataclysm in my town, put by case.World Trade Center avoids entering the barbarity of terrorism. And may have been an explicit and tough film, is a friendly and minimalist vision of an act that has positioned itself, by sad merits in the patriotic landmark in recent American history (world, I might add). Do not see the aircraft impact on the twin towers: perceive the rumor of the impact, the dull and gloomy sound producing. Everything gets rocked by a sense documentalist advancing in excess to the sweet pamphlet of a Discovery Channel with much budget. All us sounds like soft: would like perhaps a tougher vision, best narrated, more attached to life. World Trade Center is a film of Bill flat that not hooks with the reality of the emotion, while film Oliver Stone, that scourge of the yankee tradition, that traitor to the stablishment that same is dropped by Cuba to take a cigar with Fidel Castro and make another laudatory pamphlet that questioned the assassination on Elm Street giving a punch on the table of the Orthodox.One could abstract already learned iconography (impact of aircraft, bodies falling from the upper floors) and see World Trade Center as a catastrophe movie more. The two cops (McLoughlin and Jimeno) are characters in a drama content. They are partially credible. We believe, however, the collapse of a way of life, the evidence that those debris will be born a century new and that we will see the delivery. We saw him on CNN, live, or the gentle reader favorite chain, but Oliver Stone now gives us one turn of the screw and mounted a show between the irrelevant and sublime of the lives of a number of people who are struggling, above all, save life. Why we abstract us and consider that the film is a fiction and that there is behind a reliable correlation of facts that we all know and all, in one way or another, we were.Excessive footage could have been reduced if they had eliminated the trash of the sentimental life of the cops, not interested and make us lose the primary sense of the film. All this the impression that Oliver Stone would have gotten in a room to warn him. Have said you: "Look, Oliver, you're a great guy and is already well in making films that put the staff of bad milk." Give yourself a break. Tell the country that God exists and that he was there, among the rubble. For the world to know that Americans are noble people and good people. There is a hidden truth. There is a conspiracy theory. Oliver, uncle, rest a little. To maybe even gives us benefits, which is high time "." And Oliver, man, forgives, abides by the request and we loose this tale that is soft, proper, sober, but without that bit of bad grapes we all ask.In very small accounts, those who want the Oliver Stone film, we do not gustaremos of this movie. Paragraphs fans of the film, the film is good, clean as the Sunrise which close.World Trade Center, in the hands of Stone, with Nicolas Cage's tiny and domestic hero, smacks of redemption to liturgy. If Michael Mann had been in charge, we would have an accelerated, hyper-realist, extreme version without falling into al gore, and it of course, exempt from any religious point. I wonder what would make Tarantino. It would be very curious to see what these towers of faith would be our friend Quentin, where to stick the kick. |
1,195 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2302 | Dragon negro | Lo que no se ve | 2 | 5 | muchocine | New test in the direction of David S. Goyer which after the disaster of Blade Trinity, seems to have improved a bit, but even he has left much way to make a good movie. | Nick is a misunderstood guy who wants to flee to London to study a writing course and Annie is the girl problems of the Institute. Both will have an encounter because of the friend of Nick that owes money to the girl. After this the girl going to believe that Nick is guilty of accuse, to denounce the police which will be to go after and accidentally end up killing him. But Nick will return as a ghost and the girl seems to be the only one who can perceive, but this really just not made very clear in the film.New test in the direction of David S. Goyer which after the disaster of Blade Trinity, seems to have improved a bit, but even he has left much way to make a movie good, something worrying considering that his next project is the spinoff of Magneto. The film manages to have a very interesting presentation of characters and at the beginning of become the boy Ghost is something quite well reflected. But reaches a point in which the sequences they become cansinas and when it enters game the girl and his repentance, and the strange link established between the two just did not materialize.While Goyer moves away from the aesthetic videoclipera in this film, still much abusing put songs during all the footage and practically every five minutes, where, among others, are groups such as Death Cab For Cutie, Broken Social Scene, Snow Patrol, or A Perfect Circle. The film stays in a lost opportunity to go further and offer something that come out of the topics and ends up being a product that serves only to pass the time and that if we are not very pretentious. |
1,196 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4066 | Bruji | La Strada | 5 | 5 | muchocine | No one had ever tempted to comment on two movies at the same time? That is the essence of souls in the street. | No one had ever tempted to comment on two movies at the same time? That is the essence of souls in the street.Gelsomina has soul of girl and why is only comfortable in the circus. It was sold to Zampanó, a strongman with little brains, to make lover, Assistant, clown and escrow. And, little by little, with the innocence of children, is going realizing that his mission in life is to care for the strongman because if he does not she. who will do so?Augustus has a soul without conscience. For this reason it is only comfortable among thugs. It is sold to life, a forzuda of little brains to make scammer, Trickster, dishonest and collector. And, little by little, with the self-consciousness of the weary is going realizing that his mission in life is to take care of another life, because if it does him. who will do so?, Gelsomina candor in la mirada, expressiveness in the face, wanting to be useful in the middle of a permanent wandering on roads of second and third peoples. Peace has her only when he leaves to his look of illusion, and knows that his suffering is the only apparent happiness of a man who not the ama, that no repairs it more to their advantage. A man that, one day, looking at the stars, will realize that lacks that more shines; which, with only his soul, guided you as man for the only time in his life. And will it collapse. He alone, collapse exhausted and surrendered, the pain of raising its unavoidable share of failure and remorse.Augustus takes the hard look, expressiveness in the face, wanting to cheat with scams of little mounts on discrete farms of helpless people. Can't find peace except the spotted, a little there in the distance, his beautiful and forgotten daughter need money for their transition to the University, and knows that his suffering is shame for her, which is the slab that he has to wear when police he treads the heels of accusing him of thief, fraudster, useless, of vividor, nothing.And one day, looking to the top of a path, you will notice that the happiness of a song from a family who returns from work is a reflection of what should have done you man and abandoned by the easy life, without conscience money. And will it collapse. "Will it collapse alone, exhausted and surrendered with the pain ripping without awareness that money is lost time.""" Souls without conscience".""La strada".Souls in the street. |
1,197 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2887 | Rafa Ferrer | Atrapado en el tiempo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A modern classic not aging at all. | Taking advantage, not only my wedding anniversary, but the cosmopolitan channel has returned to replace some modern "classics", I encountered, again, this jewel of the current film, and, I had forgotten is magnificent is the tape of Bill Murray, Andie MacDowell, Chris Elliott, led by the always brilliant Harold Ramis, is also true that at times it can grate the recurrence of situationsgiven that Murray and we all relived again and again the same day, though, also that grated note his attractive touch, and the evolution of the life of this over and over again.Highlights as well as Murray (who was going to say to this man that Sofia Coppola was going to rediscover as "serious actor") Andie MacDowell at the time which was one of the beautiful faces of cinema (now a past to be typical of independent cinema), and Chris Elliot, in his time of highly topical for the series "Get life".The only downside I see is that someone not between "the game" of the same, and the repetition of situations seem a sovereign stupidity can occur, but is not typical, and Murray in elgunos time is too sobreactuado, but well, also sobreactuan others and are famous throughout the world.There is a real freak towards the film, with an official website about the famous Groundhog Phil and where resolve us doubts about it, by the way, the Groundhog Day is February 2, if anyone was curious. |
1,198 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/488 | Kiko de España | El caso Slevin | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The note is affected by a couple of under, but the movie has a frenetic pace (the initial flashback is spectacular) and | With a budget of something less than 20 million euros, and a young team of production, Josh Harnett including recounts through uncasting in State of grace (in particular a huge Ben Kingsley, his best performance in years, forget about the overrated "Sexy beast"), the adventure of Slevin, a kid found in wrong time and place?After a trailer in which it appeared that Guy Ritchie could start to sue everyone, the movie is with great ease and saves the visual impasse without remembering just in English, very nearly, achieving a unique style, although the genus ande sobrado "aesthetes". History, bizarre where they exist, achieved tying up without too many traps (although any, hail) and liked in its passage by Sundance, where a remarkable future you have ventured to its director. The screenplay by Jason Smilovic persuaded actors, as Willis, he confessed in his umpteenth role of murderer.In the USA has raised almost its budget (which isn't anything wrong taking into account that it was released almost at the same time here, the last nine day), and Spain takes nearly two million since its premiere day seven, so no one will regret to make accounts.The note is affected by a couple of under, but the movie has a frenetic pace (the initial flashback is spectacular) and "walls swamped most beautiful recent cinema", A phrase: "Charles Chaplin participated in a tournament of imitators of Charlie and came third." This is an anecdote. A 6´5. |
1,199 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2099 | Rafa Ferrer | La maldición de la flor dorada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Amazing spectacle for the senses, with a so strange as laughable argument, which is more associated to the clamoring of desktop to a tape of noble invoice. | I must admit first thing, my reluctance towards Eastern cinema, and it is that from Kitano until Jet Li, personally "made in Hong Kong" cinema bores me supremely, and while other (more) shell shocked the virtues of this new wave of film, to me, (the less) bored me greatly, while it is true that both told me about this tape, that led I have not very clear for that reason, I have prepared to watch her.It is visually overwhelming, just that soundly, given that if the tape were silent, nor mind too and is that the landscapes are so beautiful and are so well photographed and lit, one with eyes like dishes, and like if were seeing an advertisement for paradisiacos places, it cannot but exclaim over and over again a resounding!OHHHHHH! While at times the tape has a rather theatrical cut, and is that you removing these so perfect scenarios (real or digital?), all its dialogues could have been interpreted in a stall under a patio of armchairs current and because.Disservice makes his argument, more worthy of a Venezuelan soap opera that a tape of these features, a pity that some lances, despite the convoluted plot are so predictable, and it's easy to make in less than an hour of viewing, a Feliz with the genealogical tree of the main protagonists.Zhang Yimou, aimed at a large group of actors (do the extras also count?) among which stands out a superb Chow Yun-Fat, and the beautiful Gong Li, which I fell madly in "Memoirs of a Geisha", one of the few films set in the distant Orient in my DVDteca.Hay that see what they like to Asiansfighting style "Matrix" and it is the school of Yuen Wo-ping, has caused havoc in the country of the rising sun, probably this is not the dancer of the tape, so quiet, does not lack you tiréis all my jugular, one at a time, what neck for everyone, that if, between the flying ninjas and the archers "mora you" one passes as a baby with a caramel.A negative note to his awful dubbing (Yes, I've seen dubbed what? my knowledge of Mandarin, to day, fail for both), and is that a tape of so beautiful Bill (reminds me at times to "perfume" by poetic images), you could have cared a little more voices, and is that which announces the characters in Palace, reminds me with his voice Florentino Fernández in the saga "Austin Powers" so that one little seriousness can put you to the viewing.Every time I see one of the female performers I put one and again the same question do not assume that the Oriental has little chest? Or this film is perhaps an disguised advertisement for Wonder Bra?In short, an amazing spectacle for the senses, with an argument so strange as laughable, that are most associated with the clamoring of desktop than to a tape of noble invoice. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.