Unnamed: 0 int64 0 3.88k | id stringlengths 44 47 | autor stringclasses 181 values | title stringlengths 2 71 | rank int64 1 5 | maxRank int64 5 5 | source stringclasses 1 value | summary stringlengths 9 396 | body stringlengths 352 24.4k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3,300 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/299 | Bloody Will | Poseidon | 2 | 5 | muchocine | If you ask someone has seen her you think, you referred to see it on DVD if it appreciates your friendship | There is nothing worse in this maelstrom of remakes nonsense that try to copy a movie unforgettable for its time. "The Poseidon Adventure" of 1972, and turn it into a palomitero product that even bored.Wolfgang Petersen will not repeat the relative box office success of "The perfect storm" with "Poseidon". It will rather have to apologize to Warner Bros.. by the millions in losses that this film has caused. 160 million budget, 60 million fundraising. Is why I talk about fundraising?. Because it is directly proportional to the content of the film.Another day in Antena 3 think that they put a movie remake of the original of the 72. They could issue this version of Petersen and you have that it is also a telefilm. The situations are so mascadas that it's scary to ask how much has claimed its screenwriter.No emotion, less interpretations. From the beginning you know who smells like dead, and on top, the scene of the overturning of the transatlantic, main part of the story, it is millions of light years from the scene of the sinking of the Titanic, and that separate them almost ten years. A waste.Kurt Russel has always me fallen sympathetic. Its peak is "Blow to the Chinese small". Here is a character that splits the horns to come to the surface. Nothing relevant.But it is nor his companions make much. Richard Dreyfuss passable passable Josh Lucas, Emmy Rossum passable. This whole set of mediocrity has led to its poor fundraising, because if you ask someone that the seen that it feels, you referred to see it on DVD if it appreciates your friendship.Otherwise, and accidentally end up paying the entrance of this by-product do an experiment. Ends of seeing her and throw that has lasted. You seem an eternity its hour and a half of duration.Perfect for at home with the possibility of going to the bathroom, take pipes, and smoking you a couple of fags. Keep the money for the pirates, who have two weeks left... |
3,301 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/235 | Darko | American Dreamz | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A brave blow to the image of George Bush, the attitude of some press and the society capable of any stupidity in order to get the fame | Paul Weitz (American Pie) continues its maturation process with American Dreamz, a brave blow to the image of George Bush ("I did political to prove to my father that any idiot could do it"); the attitude of some press; to the society capable of any stupidity in order to get the fame, and the programs offered by this short-lived possibility to change people extract their innards to exhibit them in the television showcase. Perhaps spend too much time on the least mind, the songs of the contest, but Mandy Moore is a star in the U.S. and must pay the price.However, what is a novelty is that they have been so direct in his satire: after a process of makeup, actor Willem Dafoe, which cannot be further physically of Dick Cheney, is practically stuck to the Vice President. Wild MASH and trap 22, during the war of Viet Nam, took refuge in his setting in Korea and World War II. American Dreamz may not be more explicit. |
3,302 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/117 | Tito Chinchan | Truman Capote | 2 | 5 | muchocine | As a film it will be a wonder, but for the viewer of flat encephalogram and popcorn (I) becomes infumable | The poster for the film, seems that Truman is prepared in the barrier to shoot a lack. There, grabbing the urogenital area with this dull and mannered hand that holds an everlasting cigar. Incidentally, what sexy was tobacco before, right?The film is about the period of time in the life of Truman Capote, which invested in writing his masterpiece "A cold blood". One day, Truman in a newspaper read a horrible murder undertaken in a small town. Moving the people to write an article, but upon hearing of the alleged murderers, Capote gets excessively involved in what he sees as a tremendous literary Philo.The truth that the film I was disappointed enough, given that expected me something more exciting, and life that show us Capote is very boring. They teach us the obsession that reached by this story, and we profiled as it must have been this writer. But the truth that fails to engage, is long and not you understand well the bitch that gives for this crime. The performance of the actor who embodies Truman is very good, also highlighting Spanish dubbing makes fully repellent to this gentleman. The assassins also do very well its role, but it is that history is not so interesting as for almost two hours.In short, a long suckling pig smooth for a short siestecilla (or long meditation). I guess as a movie it will be a wonder, but for the viewer of flat encephalogram and popcorn (I) is infumable. |
3,303 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4374 | Christian Sandoval | La vida de Brian | 5 | 5 | muchocine | "The misadventures of an aspiring Messiah" | "The life of Brian" (1979) is the third film in the humorous group English Monty Python, consisting of John Cleese, Eric idle, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Michael Palin and Graham Chapman, who altogether, were commissioned to write the screenplay for the film. The address went to Terry Jones, who together with Terry Gilliam, had directed the previous film of the Pythons "in search of the Grail" (1975). The film was not without controversy because of the combination of comedy with religious themes. Despite this, it is considered as one of the best comedies of all time.In Judea, Brian (Graham Chapman) was born the same day as Jesus in a manger next. From the moment in which the Magi so confuse with the Messiah and after realizing his mistake, take away gifts loaded with it, the life of Brian is a series of misunderstandings and misfortunes. The truth is that he is not more than a unhappy poor, unemployed and that in addition it is constantly abochornado by his mother. Brian lives in an era in which Queen poverty and chaos, with men everywhere who claim to be the true Messiah, willing to follow parishioners to whom be and a myriad of small clandestine groups of Jews who conspire to catch the Romans. Brian will be completed involving in one of these groups and very reluctantly will be proclaimed Messiah then for "in search of the Grail" (1975), Eric idle suggested that the title of his next film should be "Jesus Christ, lust for glory". However, this was one of the many ideas that they arose in its creative meetings and was completed to discarding because the idea of making a mockery of Jesus simply would not work, because it was not a particularly funny character and the truth is that they felt that his speech was not something should taunt. Then it was thought several ideas again, as for example to make a film about Judas Iscariot, a type that was always late. Another idea was to film the life of Brian San, the disciple number thirteen. Finally and after documented reading the Bibla, this led to the idea of making a film about a contemporary type of Jesus, whose history loosely resemble to the life of the real Messiah. However shoot a plot with religious overtones them would not be easy. Once certain people linked to EMI producer responsible for financing the film, read the script, believing that the subject was blasphemous, they persuaded Lord Delfont, head of the EMI who was better to cancel the project. To see the situation in which the Pythons were left to rescue his friend Beatle George Harrison, who along with his friend Denis O´Brien banker, formed the production company Handmade Films, which finally funded the film. In gratitude, Harrison has a small cameo in the film.As it was expected, after premiering the film quickly was treated blasphemous by various groups of Catholics in the United States, while in England an organization called "Festival of light", persuaded several countries so they qualify the film for over 18 years. According to these groups, there was an excess of religious satire in the film and at the same time was the believers as hypocrites and fans. Also thought that during the course of the film, it is understood in a subtle way as many of the miracles performed by Jesus were nothing more than bizarre accidents that people interpreted as something else.Far the scene that more controversy caused was the final scene, showing the crucifixion of Brian. Christians criticized the fact that the film mofara of this landmark where supposed that Christ suffered and forgive the sinners as opposed to what happens in the film that instead, all those condemned to crucifixion are singing the song "Always look on the bright side of life" that had humorous dyes. Director Terry Jones said in an interview in which he asked him about this scene: "any religion that makes a form of torture an icon to that then they worship makes me feel honestly quite disgusted of any religion".Which best explains the error who commit all those who criticize the film however is John Cleese. For all it is an error of perspective. According to his own words truly funny is that someone has preached so passionate about love and peace so that then his followers spend two thousand years killing and torturing each other because they are unable to agree on the manner in which said it. The absurd has nothing to do with the teachings of the founder of the religion, but with what they did of them which came later. The irony of all this is that Jesus comes out only twice in the film, failing him, the center of the sketches, but people to your around, so it is difficult to understand how the film has could be interpreted as a mockery to Jesus. as in all the Python films, all members interpreted numerous roles either as Roman Centurions, parishioners in search of a Messiah who followed or as part of the "front of the people of Judea" which is a kind of terrorist organization that seeks to overthrow the Romans. The role of Brian the was given to Graham Chapman who came out of a series of problems caused by his alcoholism, which took him even to enter into a Scottish clinic because he suffered daily bouts of "tremens delirius".For the filming took advantage used in Monastir, Tunisia sets formerly used by director Franco Zeffirelli in his miniseries "Jesus of Nazareth" (1977).Director Terry Jones is responsible for that the film has a fluid rhythm and not get bored. Perhaps the only scene that could be considered as excess is the one that leave the aliens. The explanation of this particular scene was the influence of the recent success of the film George Lucas "The war of the galaxies" (1977). Actions are simply fantastic and there are some really hilarious scenes. As always, the opening credits, animated by Terry Gilliam are very good invoice and the songs of the film are equally good.The Python regard this film as the best of his filmography, and I think that I agree with them. While the British humor isn't everyone's taste, this is a film that definitely will make you laugh, something in the majority of polls it is situated as one of the best comedies in the history. |
3,304 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1930 | Alex Largo | Diario de un escándalo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | But what is "Diary of a scandal"? As a telefilm that clothes in two actresses who could well have led Oscar to which chose each. | Certainly, he was eager to see this film. Four nominations for the Oscars. Best, best supporting actress, best soundtrack and best screenplay. The film promised. But what is "Diary of a scandal"? As a telefilm that clothes in two actresses who could well have led Oscar to which chose each.The film does not know to film, does not know anything, is somewhat dull.The work of the director (of "Iris") is very correct. Although only that does not stand out on their own merits, and I very much doubt that Cate Blanchett and Judi Dench have nominations to the Oscars for the work of the director, but rather by their nature of actresses (Yes, with capital letters).And it is that this is the most notable. The actresses. Two actresses that lifted the film with impressive ease. Judi Dench creates a real monster, but a monster under the facade of a lonely and obsessive elderly woman. Dench undertake its role and makes it one of the two highlights of the tape. This nomination well could have earned her the Oscar, but the overstated performance of Helen Mirren took the statuette Dench already won as best secondary for "Shakespeare in Love".The script is quite disappointing. Although good, it should have been given more than Yes. More "cool" is the nomination for the Oscars as best adapted screenplay. Since then, will be as well adapted that they want to, but for an Oscar.La last of its nominations for the Oscars was for best soundtrack. Let's face it, is a good soundtrack. The problem is that the compositions of this man seem much, it is more, the scoring of "The hours", "The illusionist" and "Diary of a scandal", resemble much among themselves.In general a good telefilm, with a few actresses of infarction and the Oscars more nominations. |
3,305 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3522 | Matías Cobo | Leones por Corderos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | If it separates the straw of the facts dealt with in the film of the substantive arguments, the tape builds a solid speech about the growing social apathy in relation to those who govern us. | The Filmography of the director Robert Redford seems to be subconsciously equidistant of the Redford actor. Aware of having abandoned years ago his iconic role as seductive irresistible, this legend of the Hollywood star-system seems to want to prove that he has much say as director, something already proven notable prior work as a Quiz Show, the river of life or ordinary people. Now, with a tape clearly thesis and theatrical structure, Redford wishes to clear his opinion about the current political moment of his country. The imminence of elections to which Bush son no longer appear seems the main wake-up call that led to this tape. However, in the words of its Director, Lions for Lambs is intended to go beyond the socio-political situation in their arguments.And in my view that manages to go beyond mere criticism circumscribed to the questionable international role played by USA in the era post-11S. In fact, if separates the straw of the facts dealt with in the film of the substantive arguments, the tape builds a solid speech about the growing social apathy in relationship to those who govern us and build our destinies as peoples. It is true that Redford suffers from an excess of bias and builds stereotyped characters to lend the Ember to its sardine. But so too his brief footage seems to be designed to stay with a unique idea and avoid losing other accessory.Probably, the tape would receive a better grade if a play were, the environment where the Matthew Michael Carnahan script would have felt more comfortable. But I do not think that it is a waste of time to attend its screening. First, to ratify the existence of a dissenting public opinion of the Bush Administration's policy. Second, to attend a healthy exercise of self-criticism among a society that we condemn it as arrogant and overbearing. And third, to enjoy a splendid acting duel between two great as Meryl Streep and Tom Cruise. Magnificent, and dusted some of his best work as the Magnolia, is Cruise in his role as political leader capable of terrifying with its decisions and seduce with its magnetism in similar proportions.Although it is not a film for posterity, the viewing of Lions for Lambs is only advisable in these times. |
3,306 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/922 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Ficción | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Fiction explicit as few films I have seen the difficulty of humans to express love, let it flow and not to control the effects of his escape. | It was very easy fiction, with a few very simple mimbres, fell into complacency, in that the navel-gazing in which many films of this intimate draught fall. And avoids it fiction almost always: lyricism that we see that cleaning of feelings, is sincere, but overwhelming sometimes, and you feel self-conscious before this formidable display of emotions so to ras of epidermis, of people (that no characters) so honest with his life. Fiction explicit as few films I have seen the difficulty of humans to express love, let it flow and not to control the effects of his escape. CESC Gay is portrayed in the film director: Eduard Fernández immeasurable, now, I have no doubt, in an actor of fundamentals solídisimos, able to lift itself, a film in this our Spanish film so needy of attachments of superfluous additions. It is the story of a man who runs away from the city and take refuge in the House of a friend. It is the story of a reconciliation: that of a man with himself. Then fiction is not articulated as classical history, but it goes on with meekness and the words, gestures, silences, the looks are (especially) which lifted the film. The script is very short: doesn't almost bait. The merit that we leave the cinema with the impression of having seen a film and not a boring concatenamiento of cuarentones in a country house talks is the poetic pulse of a director on winning streak (in the city, his previous film was also a notable movie, or Krampack) and a cast (it says so, but the word sounds to starlettes in a staircase of a musci hall)(see, we do) in absolute State of grace (and this final sounds to San Juan de la Cruz, wrap a verse in a mystical trance, metaphysical loneliness of his retirement).We don't know if the director seeking inspiration and spiritual peace finds some of these shortcomings. It is important little. What is is the love: and immediately recognizes. Ultimately, the love story is sad. And the film: a remansada, Nice, contained and almost warm sadness makes us ask ourselves, without the stridency of the urgency for life, by stimuli make us to withstand it, enjoy it, fear her, occasionally.Recommended film in these times of Vertigo and confusion aesthetic, although shock than the characters, except for the veterinarian who makes Javier camera, occasionally speak in Catalan. There will be things of the policy, and this is a page of cinema. The own Gay was "appalled" when the Distributor came to to turn the Spanish in full force. In short, this is a page (I insist) on film and not can, by extension, at the time, by wanting to get into these byways. |
3,307 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3796 | Silvia Giner | 1408 | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Scares, intrigue, and a thread of suspense that is maintained throughout the film and not that ironic comedy so original that only King point know give to their stories. Few horror movies get me in tension until the end. | The fact that this film is based on a Stephen King story "1408", is synonymous with that for very badly adapted the book, the film is going to be good, because let's be clear, no one as King to fill us with the minds of terror. And it is precisely with what plays this film with the mind.Before proceeding with the critics want to say (because I read other reviews) that seems absurdísimo the commentary that the film "is loaded with topic of horror movies", for God's sake. first is the adaptation of a book, i.e. to the clichés of having them because I honestly do not see them, they are given by the book not for the film based on this.Continued. scares, intrigue, and a thread of suspense that is keeping throughout the film and as that point of ironic comedy so original that only King can't give to their stories. Few horror movies manage to be in tension from the beginning until the end.Mike Enslin the protagonist this brilliantly-intrpretado by John Cusack, an excellent actor who we saw not long since in Spain almost none of his films have been released. Pre-production has 8 titles to be released in 2008, the quality of this actor is undisputed, is an actor who is autodirige, reason why probably Swedish director Mikael Håfström chose him as protagonist and experience for both has had satisfactory since both repeated in 2009 with SHANGHAI showing us a period of the ' 40s that revolves around an American expat who return to Shanghai in the months prior to the facts which occurred Pearl port, due to the death of his friend. So I look forward to this title, I believe that I deserve punishment see this couple together again.Mikael, has proven to be a director novell but with lots of talent and good operation of the camera. |
3,308 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/119 | Jose Luis | Una vida iluminada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Eccentric history which becomes a fun and at times poignant road movie | Jonathan Safran, a rigid Jew, defines himself as a collector of objects, according to his own words, that is afraid to forget. Thus, by means of the most disimbolos objects contained in ziplock bags taped to the walls develops maps of the people around him. But there is a map which still has blank; his grandfather, with a couple of objects from it, still has a large part of his life indefinitely. When his grandmother dies, she receives a picture where his grandfather, being very young girl poses with a woman who according to included him except life, back in Ukraine, during the nazi invasion of that place.Jonathan decided to discover the past of his grandfather and find the woman of her photographed embarks on a journey to a distant and strange place, with the help of an old man who believes that he is blind, his grandson, who believes to know everything that is America and a psychotic dog named Samy Davis Jr. Jr., who accompany him looking for a people that nobody to heard and a woman that no one knowswithout imagining that, on that bumpy journey, you will find much more than what they expected.Liev Schreiber, an eternal secondary actor best remembered for the trilogy of Scream and Ambassador of fear, adapted and directed, for the first time, the famous eponymous novel by Jonathan Safran Foer, the eccentric history which becomes a fun and at times poignant road movie, starring a stoic Elijah wood, which makes it credible to a character that does not need rhetoric to make their voices heard and that on the contrary, as well as the tape becomes more enjoyable by their long exempted sequences of dialogue. And although it has some problems with the rhythm and dramatic parties were to some extent missed, this small tape is an excellent choice for home theater. |
3,309 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1432 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Ordet. La palabra | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Arriesgadísimo cinema, denial of the film almost because minimally cares of the usual conventions of film as art and is carried away by the spirit, by the word, by the theatrical... | Ordet is not a film for those who do not have a certain commitment to cinema as a vehicle of spiritual satisfaction. I am not referring to the film as a transmitter of values or cinema as mere show of mass moving in search of a purpose or film as candy to sweeten Sunday mornings with the family.Ordet is evidence that miracles exist: human behavior conforms to some spiritual canons and there are directors who have the sufficient sensitivity (and the appropriate master) for explicit with a minimum elements a philosophy, a metaphysics. Borgin, a peasant family politically correct and most beloved, addresses his life of bucolic retreat to the inevitable by a son obsessed by religion. There is a resurrection that we do not know if it sticks to the efficient reading of the word of God or a departure from script of the Danish Dreyer, who was a believer in volume and lomo and wrote screenplays such as who makes a pastoral or raises his Canticle that God give headquarters and hear his appeal. The father is the religious reference family and somehow transmitted these concerns to his eldest son: Johannes reads like a maniac to Kieerkegaard and it is believed, at times, Jesucristo. Ordet (the word) tells what all feel regardless of our moral filiation. Mine, for other scarce, if not, null, was left to carry the voice of Johannes apastelada and I consentí the flush of faith even by the two sparse hour. . Have faith, understood, not strictly due to mandate or religious devotion. Not this review has proposed doing an essay on the depths of the human soul. It is not the place and there is no commitment or knowledge on the subject to carry any thesis any port.The faith that profess the Borgin, in general, is a utilitarian faith: agreed to deal with the embites of the day, the hardness of the field, the Pilgrim feeling that another world can probably better exist. The only truly believes is the fool, the enlightened one, the voracious reader all transmutes it in obedience blind to the word. Dreyer films as if it were a theatrical representation: in very few occasions, I remember a camera is comfortably seated spectators. It is theatrical film without another obstacle to the dialogue fluid all the characters. This camera is, however, also roams the strict limits of a room when in the room what is relevant for the development of, on the other hand, very little (argumentativamente) plot. There is a scene in which the doctor and Johannes were ensarzan in a theological discussion acaloradoa. One requires that the faith is the salvation of the world and the doctor, burdened by his militant secularism, scientific, argues that the world is saved by the political action and critical materialism. All that well pespuntado by the movement of the camera, makes us to get involved in an absolute way in the thinking of every Boxer in this mystical combat.The viewer of this film is aware that this film is beyond any hierarchy: that more than film role is attending a willing moral revelation as if it were a movie, a reasoned and logical concatenated frame. Who has placed the film as a way of life should see Ordet at least once in life. This chronicler not asserts that each viewer get invaded by the subtlety of its purpose. There will be who see the numen and there will be who, having opposite, not perceived. And after all, I reason, faith is that. It is believed or not believed. The film is that: you're inside or only entertains you. The word, the word became flesh lucid, Vertigo of ideas.Another aspect to consider is the beauty of the scenes that happen outside the walls: the wind shaking the corn, modestísima choreography of clouds... Those details face the mental nature of the film (religion, redemption, meat, Salvation, the miracle that we know that you will get at any time) and the secret order of the universe, that does not require chants, prayers, or moral digressions to excite.It is necessary to insist on the halo of pure feeling that exhaled throughout the film. Dreyer is drunk of life. Ordet is an absolute monument to cinema with capital letters, a milestone, a real tribute to the moral nature of man above their deviations from their sins and their erratic stay in the world.Addenda: Ordet is an extreme film in many ways. Or is considered a work of art, it is my opinion, or a pain in the ass, a joke, an intolerable excess. If it is not, as always happens, you can not comment, so their opinion, look it up, give the great pleasure of sailing in this burial. |
3,310 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3387 | Patri | El sueño de Cassandra | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Interestingly, the number of tracks that Woody Allen is giving throughout the film on how he will end it, in the form of dialogues apparently unimportant. | Woody Allen is one of the few that never fails to its annual meeting released a film that may be better or worse, but is always superior to film garbage that invades us, I feel fortunate to be able to enjoy each year of the creativity of this man and I do not demand to carry out a masterpiece each time that it opens, because that would be a miracle, however it seems that many critics are intent on each piece of Woody Allen should be as good as mysterious murder in Manhattan or Annie Hall. The dream of Cassandra has received so many bad reviews that I went to the cinema to see her with questions about what was going to find me, and I started thinking that these criticisms were Foundation, the first half hour is really boring and nothing interesting happens at the beginning of the film, but when he really started the movie, I realized that was before another good movie that worth seeing and do pass a wonderful time in cinema. The introduction is too long and the end too short and abrupt, although the latter did not bother me at all, instead I created a sense known to just experiment with films and Hitchcock, Woody Allen as a certain burden of irony and complicity with the Viewer. The protagonists are Ewan McGregor, in this film makes a complicated role, a supposedly cold person and that proves capable of anything in order to get prosper economically, without apparently feeling remorse and Colin Farrell, who is his brother, a mechanic got in the game world and alcohol, which will trigger a series of events that are twisting sothe thing just like Greek tragedies to which referred several times in the film. The number of tracks that Woody Allen is giving throughout the film on how he will end it, in the form of dialogues apparently without importance, something that is also linked to the use of random element which decides on our lives, much more developed in Match Point, which only that failed for my taste was the actor is very interesting main (Ewan Mcgregor had embroidered it). With regard to Match Point, it must be said that the last three films of Woody Allen (Match Point, Scoop and the dream of Cassandra) seem to form a trilogy with the same obsessions and the same background.It seems that the "trilogy" has ended, so you know of the famous movie filmed in Barcelona, it seems it will follow the same paths. Do not be if someone else will be realized, but curiously, it seems to me that the actress who plays the girlfriend of Colin Farrel, is very much like Scarlett Johansson, was chosen on purpose? Unconsciously? Or are they mine imaginations? |
3,311 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1579 | Oscar Cantero | Un puente hacia Terabithia | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Another attempt of American industry to lead youth, monopoly fantasize film market since years ago, almost in exclusive, Harry Potter. Entertaining and well structured, but perhaps somewhat lack of pace at times. | Harry Potter marked a turning point in youth cinema, that it was not only a success unprecedented in this genre, but it also opened the way to an endless number of productions based in fantasy literature. Americans, to film little business vision but will be good, participated from the outset in the project based on the novels of J.K. Rowling, sensing the potential for development of the adventures of the young Wizard. Seven years later, J.K. Rowling is the first woman to have won more than one billion dollars by writing, and Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter) young with greater fortune of United Kingdom. But Americans still considering this saga as a primarily British product, by what are already some years seeking a genuinely Yankee alternative. The Chronicles of Narnia, or movie before us today are clear examples of this hard fight of American industry by leading the market of fantasy films. Bridge to Terabithia tells the story of a boy and his new classmate, who quickly become best friends, despite some initial setbacks. Complicity leads them to create a parallel to the real world of fantasy. In Terabithia will be rulers, will be facing the dark powers and meet incredible beings. The environment is superbly recreated, and both the picture and the interpretation of children is more than acceptable.Bridge to Terabithia is dynamic, entertaining and above all, an ode to friendship. Katherine Paterson wrote the novel in 1976, after the death of his son's best friend, to try to help him overcome the pain that he caused. And things, when done with affection, usually okay. |
3,312 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1671 | Ramón Besonias | Cartas desde Iwo Jima | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The truth is always written in the plural. A necessary film? unthinkable in the America of Bush - than good conciliator in this Spain our so desmemoriada with its history might encourage the spirit and so susceptible to the I am of Peter, I am John... | If flags of our fathers ran in continuing temporary fragmentations that danced between the reality (of the fateful battle field) and the drill (orchestrated by the powers that be of the moment), letters from Iwo Jima opts for presenting a more linear editing - and why not less discursive in its anti-war approaches and the presence always recurring memory of those who fell on the island (this time from letters that unnecessarily strove) (for sending their families)-, to the rhythm of a waltz as a slow waves (for who is not motivated, two hours and half it will be storm surge) without losing the feet on the island, evoking through letters and short scenes on the life of some characters the human side of the war in the Pacific, (common to both films) order to dismantle any ideology that leads to perpetuate the Manichean and hackneyed version the war hero, and in turn resize the true (or at least that gives us Eastwood) entity of heroism - most of the involuntary and casual - time of the soldier. This incessant effort deconstructor is and insurance will remain an effective and mature imprint in the Filmography of this great filmmaker.Now, what in flags of our fathers was a direct criticism of the political farce mounted around the heroes returned from Iwo Jima, here it declines Eastwood by an analysis more subtle and poetic of the absurdity of the war, focusing on the recreation of the event from the Japanese angle, or rather, looking for a sincere empathy with the experiences of the Japanese soldier who resisted the onslaught of American forces, but altogether devoid of criticism to the model of Japanese honour (with the suicide or suicide by dishonour as a backdrop) and, in turn, of self-criticism to American oblivion of a story that sold them (and we sold to us also indirectly) as good and bad, through war films of postwar. We must not forget the patriotic bloody Arenas (Sands of Iwo Jima), in which John Wayne calm as always saves America of the cursed charlies, while his dying soldiers fired with stoic penalty and plunges in to flag ' atop Mount Suribachi. Because of the unbearable Pearl Harbor (Michael Bay, 2001) or speak, right?In fact, few examples we have in the history of cinema that have dared to approach the Japanese point of view with respect and ideological nonsense. Include recent films such as the Empire of the Sun, by Steven Spielberg (who co-produced the film of which we speak), in which a young Christian Bale noted with admiration and curiosity to Japanese soldiers and their antler aircraft from his confinement in a concentration camp. Or the already legendary and not so distant in the Japanese Nagisa Oshima Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence, memory, where--from the unprejudiced look of a British soldier, interpreted with ease by David Bowie - already is given, in letters from Iwo Jima, an anthropological approach about the Japanese honour and sense of suicide, only that this time without the critical depth Eastwood stresses to describe the dehumanizing consequences of Japanese ancestral customs. The bridge on the River Kwai, David Lean, although to a lesser extent and with clear ideological positioning, we see how also appears to us the Japanese army humanized and understandable in their actions, in a strip and tug of war that it will lead towards the known end.However, there is no forget that letters from Iwo Jima is a film made by an American and focused a priori so her first visionen fellow, and then the rest of the so-called free world. It is not entirely a Japanese approach. But this does not only emphasize the courage of a narrative which shamelessly portrays the other (until recently the enemy) with a rigor and respect that reveal the universal intentions of Eastwood. This is used as a cultural bridge to the characters of general Kuribayashi (a prodigious Watanabe) and the Olympic and vitalista Baron Nishi. Both are accomplices of the Western Viewer, with which to identify their values and at the same time approaching conflicts typical of Japanese characters. For its part, the scared Baker, Saigo, serves as a thread conductor of all the plot - with which identify the rootlessness that produces on humans throughout war and the need to live that you encouraged in those who suffer from her - and in turn will be the innocent hand that will make possible the letters buried by time and historical oblivion be recovered so that we ourselves must not forget that these fragments left after the horror lived only everyday by way of wishes which fill our lives (a dog who escapes, skewing the hens of the neighbour; or a mother who asks his son to make only right and will protect them from bullets). We never stop being human, despite the horror of the war. The first dialog of the film opens with the following statement of the Baker Saigo: "this island is nothing sacred, for me her staying Americans".Also suggestive is the story of the military policeman Shimizu as Saigo no resists the absurdities that indiscriminately makes all conflict. For this reason, Shimizu is unable to kill the dog - and how much less a human being-. For its part, the character of the strict Lieutenant Ito is revealed as a pathetic grotesque of despechugado martial courage - a Japanese and impaired version of John Wayne - for whom if his fate is to sacrifice for the greater glory of the Emperor, will be the same fate who you rehúya and decries his sacrifice.It is this set of Russian dolls by way of small stories, placed in small facts about the general tapestry of the plot, which enriches so lucid and beautiful letters from Iwo Jima. At the same time enjoy also a more than ideal picture leaked in blue tones - sulfurar you as the volcanic island-, almost in black and white (the color of memories of those combatants). Eastwood knows what it does, and places the camera in the right place where count only what you want to, without further details that we despisten. Flat generals of the island are very beautiful, and quilting the tension of the scenes in the tunnels.Letters from Iwo Jima is a film needed - unthinkable in the America of Bush - which could well encourage the spirit conciliator in this Spain our so desmemoriada with its history and so susceptible to self I am Peter, I am John. Filmography of Eastwood is determined to unscrew, based on humanism without folds, clichés and prejudices of the old 20th century, where human beings are fragmented in good and bad by vested interests, ideologies, corrosive, and above all by our own fear to seek the truth, pelá and mondá, without additives. |
3,313 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/430 | Hartigan | Clerks 2 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A story that do not recover the magic of the original, but that does not stop being a tolerable continuation. | Twelve years later, the laborers return. Dante Hicks (Brian or?)(Halloran) and Randal Graves (Jeff Anderson) again put behind a counter to do what they like, without its trabajos-basura, laze and have witty conversations (or at least intended) on inconsequential and preferably offensive subjects. Does the original campus (replacing the original shop with a burger bar) joined Elias (Trevor Fehrman)? a fan of the transformers ultracatólico freak? and the two girls in the life of Dante: his girlfriend Emma (Jennifer Schwalbach, the director's wife) that is about to marry and whose parents seek to fix them life in Florida, and Becky (Rosario Dawson), the Manager of the premises with which he maintained an adventure. And how it can not be otherwise this being a product Kevin Smith, there teem Jay and the silent Bob (Jason Mewes and Smith himself), icons of the generation X or very worn jokes as fall you to everyone.Curious decision of Smith returned to where everything began. Clerks was an unprecedented independent cinema triumph and Smith catapulted to fame, but the director of New Jersey has failed since then connect with the public that exalted him. With the exception of the products only to fans of Jay and Bob, his last films (Chasing Amy and Jersey Girl) were sonados batacazos. We don't know if what the success or the age has lost to Kevin Smith, but the key to Clerks was in its irony, bad milk and bittersweet look on his generation. Since then, Smith seems to have been only saved the bad baba to his critics and demonstrates the need for sentimental plots which do not square and that leave one perplexed.Smith knows that it is his hooligan side that makes it special to his film. In Clerks 2 has tried to overcome the original but as it has not succeeded in creating more funny situations, these are simply more beasts. Frankly, one understands that a spectator to the tone of the dialogues is tempted to get up and go (without justifying the critic who starred in the famous scene). In Clerks, a person inadvertently had sexual intercourse with a corpse. In Clerks 2, a person has willingly considerably explicit with a donkey sex, while another masturbates at the time that apologizes to Jesus. Of the prank we have gone to the coarse brush, which will not dish taste for all.That is why the sentimental plot of the movie even more incongruous. Not only is conventional: is even ñoña. It is the triumph of love, family and friendship, the need to believe in yourself without being conditioned by the conventions. A final truly Disney, replacing the fairy godmothers by Jay and Bob in an acrid plot twist. Because that is what intuíamos with Mallrats and here are proven definitively: Smith is Disney with swearing. We dare to say that Clerks 2 is a family film with images as Dante's drooling before a toothless little girl that yours (again, the daughter of Smith), but see hard to keep the ears of children covered during the other half of the film, in which discusses the virtues of a sexual practice of alternate consecutively sodomy with oral sex.Smith is the Shyamalan of comedy. A director not merely has his own style, but is identified in aberrant levels with their own films and those locks himself in his personal universe, which seems able to secede. Smith grabs its players and its themes as fetishes, and thence out the successes and failures of the films. As successes highlight that, when it does not exceed, the humor of Smith reaches quotas of genius, well within its genre meta-freak. The generational clash between fans of the star wars and the Lord of the rings is hilarious, but one has the feeling that instead would be outside the cinema, not on screen. The main failure is however the inability to carry the film beyond the anecdote. The love triangle is particularly disastrous. I think wonderful Smith considered his wife as "the girl that everyone wanted in the Institute", but the reality is one and does not forgive. His role as blossom not simply strain. Dawson, for its part, seems to have only two records: sex bomb or girl freak, according to camera privilege their succulent Anatomy or his little graceful jaw (another trick is usually set if get you glasses or not). His romance with Dante seems completely forced, by many miraditas of lamb put you (does not help you create to hear the music of shark everytime Dawson smiles) and its conversion of cynical nihilist believer in love has the credibility of a euro of San Marino. The rest of the actors make the unique role that have ever made (I am not exaggerating, lean your chips: most or only working for Smith or Smiths) in a story that do not recover the magic of the original, but that does not stop being a tolerable continuation. |
3,314 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1106 | Rafa Martín | Rocky Balboa | 3 | 5 | muchocine | For a few glorious five minutes, Rocky Balboa has the best boxing scenes seen in years. You don't say much, given that the genre is not abundant. | There are times in which Rocky Balboa reminds me that old gets to look at works and explain to the foreman that the building is going to fall because the cement not curdled and as it collapses the very bastard with thirteen families inside which will load the OWL is him. You look to the poor Lord with affection and sympathy, but generally speaking, we usually spend their views by the lining of the balls. Rocky Balboa isn't the resurrection of Stallone (born in 1946), and even less when he returns to a saga which began personally more than thirty years (30, thirty seven Olympics). But it is a film that not offended anyone, performed correctísimamente, with a good script and, above all, a splendid photography and is a return to realistic in the first film and much of the second tone (up to Adrian wakes up from his coma, in Rocky II, and the first thing that tells her husband is it aniquile to Apollo Creed)(, from there, the Rocky series becomes Portaventura).Adrian has not been able to cheat death again. Us has died of cancer and Rocky Balboa still in his little world and living of the past, as Walter Sobchak. The clientele goes to his restaurant to hear their war stories, his brother-in-law Paulie continues to work on the same meat factory, his son has gone to the dark side and become stock exchange broker (could have been journalist, almost worse) and tries to rebuild his life with the girl who sent him to hell in the first installment, Marienow divorced and with another kid to slopes. Do this that comes the leap of faith: a computer program determines that, in the old days, it would have been capable of ending the unbeaten champion of world heavyweight, Mason?The Line? Dixon. Pifostio media that generates forces the Italian Colt to return to the ring and hence we have again. "Gonna Fly Now, staircases, sweat shirt and grey pants included.""I have 60, but to see who gets the vein as I."The first three quarters of an hour of the film are a pain in the right direction. Rocky talks with Marie. Rocky talk to Paulie. Rocky speaks to his son. His son speaks to his father. Rocky speaks to the son of Marie. Buy a new dog. And come to remember Mickey (the old deaf which trained him until that pushed you Mr. T and died in the third - Port Aventura, remember-), and the ice rink, the gym and the old bar, and that monumental ass. However, as all these scenes are very well shot, and it seems that they exude genuine emotions, the public who really knows that Rocky was always a saga about a poor sack of hosts who refused to fall when they said it, with its two balls, feel a lagrimita of nostalgia. There are really good moments, as everything about Adrian and Paulie, as well as talks with Marie (very good, Geraldine Hughes) and other completely unnecessary and that it could have cut, with the danger of turning the film into a medium (all the stuff of the son, played by the baleful Milo Ventimiglia, who does not know of the reality that surrounds him and if not there is the ultrasobrevalorada Heroes to prove it).What works in this part is the classical sense of Stallone and magnificent photography of j. Clark Mathis, which much resembles what was Robert Richardson in Casino, with colors everywhere and light sources from don't know where, they threaten to cause blindness to the actors. Sly has been in this business of film more of what I've been in this world and fuck that if it shows, because even the most boring dialogue is treated with sufficient care and MIME that we draw the attention. In addition to time when Rocky chistecitos are always ("I feel like a kangaroo, with all these things in your Pocket"), bad pure which are hilarious. Everything is treated with much care and that is not bad, but if you alargas too, it will be unbearable. And it is just at that moment that Stallone decided to launch the train with the structure that all devotees know: training, musical, after Assembly and hosts. Highlight above all the presence of Tony Burton, in the role of Duke, coach of the deceased Apollo Creed which is casca best monologue from the film ("? gonna you give the old trauma by forceful blow of a lifetime") and see Stallone, as Donkey Kong throwing barrels to gain strength, which is the only thing he has left the such Dixon is a miracle of genetics and hits you four hosts before your body receives the first.And for a few glorious five minutes, Rocky Balboa has the best boxing scenes seen in years. Not IE much, given that gender is not abundant, but those first five minutes, with a television planning (including pay-per-view logo) worth all of Ali. Stallone is still Boxer like me player of curling, but Antonio Tarver is a bad beast and although sings when hides the fist to not to let the rest of his life, Stallone incapacitated?Magic Man? know move (mainly because it has been the world's Lightweight Champion). Then director Stallone her shit completely, start to do strange things with the camera (black and white, slow enables camera, degraded, mounting to the Michael Bay). "For someone who has tried to maintain a calm tone and with his feet on the ground throughout the film, is a contradiction.""Potoma!"And you know what? To the peo. Better stay with the end where win or lose, everyone applauds Rocky saga comes to a happy conclusion, without "nothing in the basement", as it said Stallone, and with the feeling that we got rid of a real disaster, the heart and the efforts that had been in the filming. Rocky Balboa is the very best that has been done in years and leads to the desire to go back to the Viewer from ventitantos, who grew up with the best of the eighties action cinema, and now cannot but weep to see the show that give this bunch of cocoons made through action heroes. I those climbed them into the ring, so them fostiara Tito Rocky (and if it fails, I always have the option of jumping I? and my friend Fergie, the chainsaw). |
3,315 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3673 | Oscar Martínez | Chrysalis | 2 | 5 | muchocine | With a bland and predictable plot, its unique appeal lies in its setting. | Chrysalis is a thriller futuristic directed by Julien Leclercq and starring Albert Dupontel, Marie Guillard, Marthe Keller, Mélanie Thierry, Estelle Lefebure and Francis Renaud.Presentada in the official section Premiere in the last edition of the Sitges Festival, Chrysalis tells the story of Lieutenant David Hoffman, who returns to rejoin the service in the European police to trap a dangerous criminalsuspected of the murder of his wife months ago. A complicated investigation just leading him to a mysterious private clinic led by the unflappable Brügen Professor. In a world where the past can be implanted in the nerve center of the brain, the memories have become a very coveted good with a quite successful aesthetic halfway of cyberpunk, Chrysalis cannot remind us, at least in terms of aesthetics is concerned, to films like children of men or even the only one. In fact, the similarities between the directorial debut of Julien Leclercq and starring Jet Li nor are so outrageous, although Chrysalis is much more calm, although why not more interesting.The truth is that the fabric of Chrysalis - also relatively similar to the memory of the dead or even, why not, to total challenge - runs very slowly between bluish steel constructions and design furniture, making that a scant hour film and media reaches antojar quite longer. And it is that the alleged complexity of a plot that mixes memories, past, present and future is carried with a tedious simplicity, that history fails to call us at any time the attention, leaving us only specific fighting the Matrix Online and the previously mentioned scenery.Archetypal, and flat characters in dialogues canned and predictable, the atmosphere of film Chrysalis futuristic noir dissipates each minute of footage, producing a growing apathy in the spectator intensified, if possible, by its environmental austerity, because in (almost) any time we can see the real outside world of the near future, so only alleys, laboratories and interiors, which is why even his aesthetic preciosista ends becoming sterile.Thus, Chrysalis no longer a new film set in the near future whose beauty inspired - more or less - in this jewel called Blade runner is his only final attraction, something that has been happening a long with titles as the also French Renaissance, Natural city, Gattaca, children of men, Minority report or Equilibrium, while especially these last four possess a greater background to Julien Leclercq.Algo bland movie, the truth.I give a 4 10plants. |
3,316 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2384 | Oscar Cantero | El libro negro | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Acceptable historical drama that suffers from the typical defects in the Filmography of the returned Verhoven, and resulting in the existence of parallel plots more characteristic of the folletín than of anything else. | The black book is another film set in the times of the second world war and that the drama of the race it is Jewish in the then occupied Holland; and it does so through the life of a young Jewish joins the resistance after the murder of the family and infiltrates in a nazi headquarters which will live unsuspected situations.With a somewhat sensationalist treatment of certain aspects, indeed that it is staged in general a very divided society in which either by conviction, action or omission, the majority of people takes little compromised positions or directly in favor of the invaders.The work of documentation does seem to be very well done, and the recreation of environments and scenarios reaches more than acceptable levels. The argument, being good, loses intensity at times, and sometimes seems a little far-fetched, but maintains a positive tone quality in general.What it is true and is usual also in the films of Paul Verhoven, which leads to a sense of leaving cabos without tie, and has an excessive tendency to intersperse sex and secondary plots in parallel, as well as the fact that there are certain stoppages of play throughout the film and scenes that little or no contribute to the total.In any case, is a good production in which the conscientious work of the cast components supplied the above shortcomings, and get that spectator pass like a while entertaining, to know a part of the history of the 20th century in a Europe that so many lessons to the rest of the world in the field of civilization and values, but that has always been the focus of most important and destructive conflicts. |
3,317 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1958 | Daniel Galindo | Moscow Zero | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Entertainment is often incompatible with the cinematic perfection. It is what is happening with this new notch in the race of moon, filmmaker so atypical as criticized. | Dispar. This is the work of María Lidón, best known in the industry for his space nickname which gives idea of orbits in other parts. His gaze daring cinema today makes him worthy of praise and ridicule.Do the latter we will arrive soon, only allow me to recall the Moon filmography: began with castaways, an adventure on Mars incredible and worse told to follow later with Yo, puta, where combined with Sham documentary tone, with Daryl Hannah and Denise Richards.¿De where gets funding for their projects? What are your contacts in the scene? They must be interesting to count performers renowned as Val Kilmer and others listed by their worth, case of Joaquim de Almeida, which here does show her. That get so much money, the question that arises is why its oversights in the script and inconsistent interpretations of their actores-estrella, that border the pathos.The bowels of Moscow can generate one and dozens of worthy of reaching the film stories is something that does not take us suddenly. Why not get catch this descent to hell taking as input the Muscovite metropolitan transport? The dark, claustrophobic atmosphere spreads of a formal apathy resulting in repetitive levels, recurring music and a rough script that baby of two references already classics: the spine of the devil, by Guillermo del Toro, and the resounding 7337 film, about a group of children to 'hide' in a school during the Spanish civil war and. Up there we can count.Giving him the benefit of the doubt even? can be that Moon will not see many productions Spanish-, Moscow zero must trace the pre-críticas which usually generate this Director. It costs much to believe us that the depths of Moscow are controlled by urban tribes that appear and disappear by magic and attend the delusions of a kind obsessed with legends dating back to narrated 1920.Mal perplexed, this tale is much more acrid, if it is garnished with absurd winks: a priest kissing with a peculiar Guide to the underworld, the eternal struggle between the living and the dead by one place in the world (live, clear) and fast camera movements following stelae and shadows, the same as all bad horror film.By the way, directors friends of cinema, some of the best stories of the genus occur in full light of day, the case of who can kill a child? Hence there is no darkness that camufle the imperfections. |
3,318 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/990 | Jose Luis | Infiltrados | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A detective story that Scorsese transforms her into a memorable sample of the genre. | If ever going to give a prize Oscar Martin Scorsese as best Director, and finally acknowledge his excellent career, should they give it once, for his excellent work on the infiltrators, the tape that some consider already a masterpiece and a classic crime film? And perhaps these assertions are not so risky.On this occasion Scorsese, puts his masters to the order of a story that takes place in the streets of Boston, which could be one city, which succeeds in creating a direct dialogue with the public, rarely seen in his film.Based on the Taiwanese movie Internal Affairs, the story is about the rise of two policemen, one (Di Caprio) infiltrated the lines of the bloody Irish mafia, commanded no more and no less than by Costello (Jack Nicholson), and another (Damon), whose career rising is not more than with the intention of passing information to your own boss; Costello.A long history is narrated as each of the two characters they are involved in more complex situations, taking them to live trying to conceal his true identity constantly and playing his own skin every minute.The task force could not be unbeatable, Jack Nicholson, as the omnipotent mafia boss, filling his character of a cynicism bordering on fun, becoming an antithesis of the godfather of Marlon Brando. Leonardo Di Caprio performed the best performance of his career, far above his celebrated work on the Aviator, becoming the absolute protagonist drove the audience to the bag with just a few scenes. Matt Damon, his counterpart, completes the trio and Boston city, its streets, its various locations are backed by a very good cast that includes Mark Wahlberg, Martin Shen, Alec Baldwin and the beautiful ribbon, Vera Farmiga.La, become a character more, an atmosphere perfect for that the actions take place in the proper environment. And is there where passes one of the scenes more memorable, in Chinatown, where the characters of Damon and DiCaprio, very similar each other chase each other, trying to discover.With this tape in addition, Scorsese returns to the usual violence used in their first tape, this type of violence which in less than a minute, several characters have died with their heads reventadas bullets and that verbal violence that allows that the word fuck repeat 236 times. And it is also one of their tapes with a resulting rate and an overwhelming energy, which seems to be dedicated to all those who believe that he is a boring director.The only detail that many could refute him, is the end of the tape, which surely divides to the public in two, those who loved and those who hated and that could certainly be the subject of a lengthy discussion.In short, what appears to be a simple police story that someday has in channel five a Saturday night, is actually a complicated, intense and intelligent thriller, a tape that without doubt will be remembered for a long time, in the hands of any director may have been a rehash any but in the hands of a wise and experienced artistbecomes in a memorable and essential work. |
3,319 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3915 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Halloween El Origen | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Psychopaths at this point fill: real tired of this gross gang of mindless that spare no efforts to go scoring notches on the handle of his Toledo steel. Under fill, there is not a bad film. Or not good. | I am very out of prowess in sadism and vulgar guts that the psychopaths to the Leatherface or this Michael Myers have supplied the terror of the eighties (Carpenter, Hooper, Craven) and new terror of boasting modern, but fed by these old Brats (Zombie, Aja). I consider myself a sensible spectator, in what I can, soon advancing to the enthusiasm of excessive unless circumstances recommend a good dose of euphoria and healthy nonsense, comfortably installed in the certainty that the cinema is a formidable entertainment, a sublime art and an accomplice of all sink which do not consider it neither entertainment nor, of course, art to make it. Rather let me carry for very primary emotions, which then inevitably I transformed outside the cinema and more afternoon mutual (now) in impressions, notes that perhaps only threaten dialogue to the Viewer (I) with the chronicler with the stubborn type. Needless to say that I also. So a movie like this one, joy of the batch of vicious of the orthodoxy of the body count, gore light or the aberration in the form of multiple killers, has not left me trembling, or I've been acomplejado by the glow of mythical film (the night of Halloween, John Carpenter, 1.978). This prequel without complexes, ametrallada by the vigorous Rob Zombie pulse, sparing no violence nor is hooked to what would have been easy, that is, compose an exercise in cinema for teenagers with acne and some clueless easily impressionable and retina greedy battering, saws and all the paraphernalia of masks so dear by the troops of gross that we are discussing. Rather it outlines an honest assault on a predictable story of desastrada, extraordinarily salpimentada children of all Freudian topics that the gentle reader has seen in dozens of films cut by the same commercial scissor. This part of an absolute master of his vices: Zombie loves the slasher, spoils it, granted privileges of noble gender, and I do not go on to consider whether there is or not because there is no negligible formats (understand) or minor genres and everything is left rocking by the ingenuity, the Magisterium or simply the creative value of who invoice it. Zombie, whose music is not of any of my abundant devotions, is (on the contrary) a director with punch, we would say, one which has been able to understand without excessive time in the industry what convulsive way works and how it is possible to matrimoniar film entertainment, saleable, consumable without more punches or cultural subterfuge and, moreover, a technical packagenarrative and up acting more than decent. Nothing here alarm by their mediocrity, nothing is (however) bad of solemnity and there are even moments of estimable film, well planned and with solvency. This is why what Halloween, origin leaves a bittersweet memory. Much, ultimately, thinking how little that esparaba. The film highlights the autopilot when the calibration of knives and masks leave his prison and is dragging (are perhaps many minutes) until its unruly end where Myers does not die by much that is obceque writer and one Regiment of infantry or current rambos. That end, hit up the naúsea is that uncomfortable, which lowers grata (more or less) attracting its passable starting and its intermediate entertaining. Serves me sad consolation vision geek Brad Douriz and Malcolm McDowell, formidable actors distinguished in serie B, not C or Z or which the gentle reader decide and usual always appreciable Fund of catalogue of our videoclubs, cahoots by chance to capture Myers. And there is where it is impossible not to think what good couple of wicked would be, what waste of talent for evil giving these kind roles of men who defend a cause and die or are dying loved ones, but that has been my private movie fan aberration (open here) and does not require, in any way, endorse film. Otherwise, it will have to wait to that Zombie matures more and perhaps in learning that capture other more personal essences and stop twisting the topic, the classics (for who and the nomenclature) and mythical films. For the record, however, my passion (moderated) by John Carpenter. In short, drops a revision of the tape of the 78. It is already too much (much) that I do not see. |
3,320 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1788 | Pruden Rodríguez | Moscow Zero | 1 | 5 | muchocine | It adds nothing, do not have anything new, nor from a new point of view, it not hooked, not scared, am not intrigued, anyway... not get nothing of what you intend to, to tell the truth... I do not know what is exactly. | Moscow Zero. patatero. They will forgive me the easy joke, but it is that few films put him to egg and finally, I could not resist. Suffice it to say that the best of the film is that, one: saw in press pass (i.e., free) and two: it finished soon and I could go to the pass of "After the wedding", which turned out to be a peliculón. But that's another story.The case is that I left Moscow Zero as cold as I went (was rainy day). It adds nothing, do not have anything new, nor from a new point of view, it not hooked, not afraid, not intrigue, anyway. achieves nothing of what you intend to, but to tell the truth. I do not know what is exactly.The feature of the Spanish Director Moon (AKA María Lidón) is set in the subsoil of Moscow. There, father Owen is looking for a friend, the anthropologist Sergei Karparov, disappeared in strange circumstances when investigating the legends of the marginal society of Moscow underworld. In the search accompany three other men (do me not say who are exactly. a pair of mercenaries, a collaborator, something) and a woman (a vagrant that would have been the last Miss Spain Street). Together they travel dozens of narrow corridors, far left, far right, now I've seen a brand, now smell me that it is here. and meanwhile some mysterious children will be watching them from the shadows.Trite, empty and history with a smell of "The other". Parallel worlds where each one thinks that the demon is the other legends who want to seem very enigmatic and at the end. no surprises. Anyway, it is really boring. More claustrophobia causes fatigue and more than fear of laughter. The motivations of the characters are unclear and, in any case, are shallow. But as well as flat characters, there is a total absence of work in dialogues. Especially annoying monologues of Sergei Karparov, which is speaking only through the corridors as that does not want the thing: "Oh, an inscription." "I'm going to read it and explain it aloud." That Yes, we have to love story. After several hours hanging around by the happy galleries the vagrant decides to retire (is that everything is very scary and I can not remember to what came with the well that was eating rat wings.) (Better me again I by myself). Despite not having crossed practically Word with the prota (except a couple of indirect without coming to story) before leaving decides to plant a good morreo father Owen who, of course, receives the enchanted gift. Momentazo.NI even a couple of scares can take you. Everything is predictable. For example: Alec, one of the guides, sees a lantern that had been lost in a hole where you can only arm. He decided to take it and go!, the hole had trap. It takes out suddenly, screaming and looking at the brand of bite that has. All are concerned about what happened, but despite initial concern, just accepting that it has because of RIP with the stone. More careful the next time Alec!The only thing positive I can find to this is the faith that María Lidón puts in their projects. Something certainly does well to take them forward. Sold in advance in zillions countries, with a budget of 10 million dollars and a fairly interesting cast, Moscow Zero was filmed in real scenarios, the majority in the own Moscow. And already are three films with this. Finally, we hope that the third and fourth will the expired. Time leave us this pretentious grotesque, that someone dare to call cinema. |
3,321 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3419 | Silvia Giner | Resident Evil Extincion | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Need film being raised over 100 million dollars in USA. Resident Evil like "and long". 3 Movies of the saga of perhaps the most faithful to the game with that none of the 3 is an absolute parallelism. | This is not to assess a good script or is not pigeonhole this film between "good or bad", not because Resident Evil is much more than that. For all fans of the video game in which the trilogy is based, see on the big screen which will have surely been for us a good part of our adolescence (weekends full playing Resident Evil in the play) is outside all objectivity. Still I will try: Russell Mulcahy brings us this sequel which seems to be the last for the moment and that is not exactly true to the game, but some are so geeks that we are satisfied. This director who seems to be to settle in the genre as it has in preproduciión "Zen in the Art of Slaying Vampires" (not saying nothing.), gives us a breath of fresh air in the saga Resident Evil. I must confess that I do not I had liked excessively the previous ones, but this is different. In addition to being everything much more careful, photography, costume, makeup (sometimes you retouching digital in exajeradisimos makeup, there's first flat primerisimos mile seems that the face of wax, I do not know if it's intentional or not, but stay, is horrible) the arguento connects perfectly with the previous films, which they were not able to do consistentlyExtinction at least preserved the coherence not only in if same fate with his predecessors. Mile is much better directed and even seen a slight evolution in his character, calmer and to dominate the situation. We already know that it is not a great actress, but she is a good actress of action. It is still too thin for my taste and especially for the role, but they fix well poniendole an overdose of costume (poor mia so sheltered in the desert) with which it sure had to be raising chicks. In conclusion this is a kind of necessary film and the truth is that it has been collected over one hundred million dollars in USA. Resident Evil like "and long". Of the 3 movies, this is perhaps the most faithful to the game with any of the 3 is an absolute parallelism. |
3,322 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/384 | Dragon negro | Monster house | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A good movie that can enjoy both children and adults and is one pleasant entertainment, another animated film that surprises. | Recently digital animation film is that more pleasant surprises comes giving fun, entertaining films and with consistency, exceptions clear. But Monster House is another proof of that, the second film of animation from the hand of Robert Zemeckis, this time only performs tasks of executive producer, with the invaluable help of Steven Spielberg, leaving the direction the rookie Gil Kenan, will have more luck than the failed Polar Express Christmas story, as its theme is by far much more appealing than its previous.We are Monster House in the typical neighborhood of American houses, but one of these houses is not what appears in reality and its owner is an old Grump that does not allow anyone approaching or even to your garden. D.J. is the boy who lives in front of the mysterious House, and obsessed with her, gets the day observing and pointing every detail that happens. An accident will the old man disappears and the House is single, it is when D.J. and his friend Chowder will have to face seriously to the House, which seems to come alive at times.We could classify the horror film for children, but it is really a funny story that perfectly combines the history of fear with loaded with humor moments. There are scenes and notable moments as the first time that the two friends are with the girl and the two want to impress her or the couple of policemen that are the most surreal, for highlighting one.Monster House improvement at the level of animation results with Polar Express using the same technique, with real actors that should be every day a suit and special shoes and then makeup is them put a rubber head and a reflective points on the face to capture each of body movements and facial expressionsthen acting in a kind of set that was a totally empty box where developed its roles. Then would have step the process of animation and decorated. The characters are much more cartoony this time I even dare to say Burtonianos, and we have actors of the stature of Steve Buscemi giving life to the grumpy old haunted house or Jasón Lee making friends with the babysitter, but without doubt the most notable performance is that of Kathleen Turner giving life to the House.A good movie that can enjoy both children and adults and is one pleasant entertainment, another animated film that surprises, one of the best proposals for this weekend if we are going to the cinema. |
3,323 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3720 | JLO | Caja negra | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Ortega surprises us with a film at times baffling, intimate, minimalist, almost without a script visible but always vital to demonstrating that with few words or even gestures, you can say too. | Say to start the debutant director Luis Ortega is the son of the cantante-actor - political Palito Ortega and also brother of the also singer Emanuel want to set aside prejudices and put us squarely in his directorial debut, which seems by intention and tone, to break away from his family clan.What we say because his particular look does not accept any kind of fussiness, addressing something crude such as old age and the complex father/daughter relationships, grandmother/granddaughter. Ortega surprises us with a film at times baffling, intimate, minimalist, almost without a script visible but always vital to demonstrating that with few words or even gestures, you can say too. Dorotea (Dolores Fonzi, couple at the time of the director) must care alone for her grandmother and at the same time to rebuild the relationship with his father that just came out of prison and is a character seldom seen in our cinema. A weak person to the edge of the disabilities portrayed by Eduardo Couget (of aspect cacariturezco) director found through the streets of San Telmo begging and both in the film and in real life, living in the neighborhood Salvation Army. Without issuing judgment nor condemn the characters and with slow pace but fluid, portrays the suffering and solitary confinement, degradation and destitution in a natural way and at the same time, as if you were slightly Manus. Manners, without defined direction and even ambiguous repetitions of scenes, the video footage pales a little good successful photography. Punto y aparte for the lead role of the grandmother, a salient feature of the film played by Eugenia Bassi 99 years - not actress - owner of a lúcidez and humor enviable for its age, died five months after finishing the shooting, with a senile warmth who was remembered in the film year-end balance sheets.Luis Ortega then is another representative of new independent cinema Argentino, in the stylistic line of the Caetano, Perrone and Trapero, in a surprising and promising debut (22 years!) and with a second film (Monoblock, 2007) to explore on my part. |
3,324 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3745 | Ana Belén Pacheco | La brújula dorada | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Of time, and with only the first piece of the puzzle have the obligation to suspend this Christmas experiment that I have no doubt copará movie billboards and the gifts of the child menus of all fast food restaurant which boasts. | Perhaps me back older and already I do not like the infantiles-juveniles films of adventures. I was all praise for the Goonies, I who knew the dialogues of the Prodigioso Chip of memory, I I went to film the day of the premiere of the Lord of the rings, I I'm going disguised to all event self-respecting Star Wars, book I that I look forward to wield my wand when exit the next Harry Potter do something has happened between all this which has made losing perspective on fantasy films? I recognize that the Chronicles of Narnia seemed peñazo n (James McAvoy, excluding of course) and this new trilogy seem to absolutely follow the same steps.The Golden Compass is the first book of the dark matter, as they call the series of books about a world where humans coexist with their spirits that shaped animals called Dæmon (Yes, I also thought that the next step was to Picacho come out for a corner). Mysterious disappearances of children and the existence of a subject called "Dust" trigger the protector of Lyra Belacqua to leave to investigate phenomena in the highlands while the girl will travel with a mysterious and powerful woman. Everything portends a great adventure gets and say this is coming because it clearly does not have an end if that isn't a long prologue to the next adventure.I admit that I am a little upset before the brief and dull appearance of Bond, James Bond this tape and simultaneously intrigued about the decision to take Nicole Kidman as random roles after winning his Oscar. Now not you can trust a film with her in the cast as a guarantee of quality because it seems that your agent has taken a vacation to advise. The result is a long and boring movie but with a sensitive and precocious photography that leads from Oxford to the pole. It can not put you any formal hits the tape and do not dare to wear to the script without having read the novel that perhaps seen as a whole will have a certain grace. Of time, and with only the first piece of the puzzle have the obligation to suspend this Christmas experiment that I have no doubt copará movie billboards and the gifts of the child menus of all fast food restaurant which boasts. |
3,325 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3680 | Oscar Martínez | Promesas del Este | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Cronemberg portrays at the same time the most despicable and instincts laudable human under the instinct of survival as he is only able to do. | After having terrified many with films like came from inside of, rabies, Videodrome, Scanners or fly, the Canadian filmmaker David Cronemberg began to change registration already with the naked lunch (or even before), but was not until A history of violence when the dramatic concerns of the director were acclaimed worldwide.With Eastern promises, David Cronemberg returns to work together with Viggo Mortensen, who is accompanied on this occasion by Naomi Watts, Vincent Cassell, Armin Mueller-Stahl, Sinéad Cusack and Donald Sumpter. The film tells the story of the mysterious Nikolai, born in Russia, which works as a driver of one of the most important families of organized crime in Eastern Europe. Headed by Semyon, the charming owner of expensive Russian restaurant hidden behind a brutal and cold nature behind his smile, the fate of the family reeling due to Kirill, his crazy son, which makes more case to Nikolai than to his own father. But the cautious Nikolai life changes suddenly when he meets Anna, a midwife who works at a hospital in London. Anna is very affected by the situation in which was a teenager who dies giving birth, and decides to look for the family of the girl based on the newspaper that left written in Russian. To digging in the diary, Anna inadvertently triggers the wrath of the mafia.It can be that you for many, which I included before leaving to rest this criticism for a few hours before putting me to write it, Eastern promises is something less than A history of violence, much more direct and with fewer concessions. But, after recalling the story and dialogues, after recall certain sequences, some details, a server has chosen to change their minds.A shocking hyperrealism, Eastern promises is, as usual in the work of the Canadian, a sort of manners portrait of a sector of society, unknown to most, at the same time a reflection of the brutality inherent in the human being. With Viggo Mortensen taciturn in contrast with Vincent Cassel rather than convincing and, above all, with an Armin Mueller-Stahl truly superb, Eastern promises naked without any concession the animality of man unleashed by the power and the arrogance.Cronemberg portrays at the same time the most despicable and instincts laudable human under the instinct of survival, showing them under a false appearance reflects, on the one hand, through a bleak Viggo Mortenen capable of performing heinous acts with a terrifying estoicidad at the same time that does not hesitate to bring into play its own integrity in an altruistic Act and, on the other, with an Armin Mueller-Stahl under whose affability hides a capable of killing both by imposing its respect, a respect that is undermined by the acts of his own son and hide their sins ruthless being.On the other hand, can be said that the role of Naomi Watts is perhaps the least attractive of Eastern promises, representing the London citizen (read Western) current who discovers the sordidness of a London slum and unknown, almost marginal, in which a modern revision of the tyranny and slavery to survive under the figure of clans and mafias.Anyway, maybe that Eastern promises finf some slowness in your footage, in which the events occur with a chilling everyday, without excessive shocks or unexpected plot twists. And, as usual in the Filmography of the Canadian, their violence is filmed with an almost hurtful, aberrant harshness in some cases with a hyper-realism, a naturalism, tremendously impressive.Very good film.I give it a 8 out of 10. |
3,326 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3727 | Iñaki Bilbao | Mr Magorium y su tienda mágica | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Strange and extravagant film fantasy genre, something boring in general. | Film from the fantastic genre, but absolutely fantastic in terms of entertainment and good pastime.Perhaps what I am about to say is no more than the opinion of an adult referred to a movie aimed primarily at children and therefore should not be taken into much consideration, but the truth is that it is one of the most boring films that I remember seeing in recent times (and I've seen a few already).The thing frankly begins well, with imagination even or the less enough originality. I refer to the initial credit titles, where we are seeing to the components of the facets technical without that put they are assemblers or musicians or photography. We simply see their names along with animated obejtos give us to understand in what apartao are included, but we should be very attentive to perceive it. It is frankly good this way to display them.But when the story begins, everything changes something I do not know how to qualify. It is a film from the fantastic genre, but very strange, bizarre, extravagant, so I've not caught you the point or the comma. I have failed where to take her, the truth.It is a cluster of scenes animated (the store) that are displayed randomly, forming an amalgam of situations that are immersed in a whole, but something inenteligible.The dialogues, the characters, the message, the original, escape me as water between your toes. Much sentimentality, in my view quite cheap: that if you don't go (die) please. Yes, that I do so, it is my time, look in your interior. In short, Sanctimony butt in my opinion. Perhaps we must persevere in our dreams, to achieve them, perhaps all must not lose the illusions of childhood, perhaps... But what does, the truth is that, as the argument is represented, nor do I know or I imported a cumin, as it demonstrated that I can even say that I slept on one occasion. I guess they were two minutes only or so (when enter you Magorium in a hospital) .and was a break for me.No, I did not like this film, it has seemed very well fotografíado but no I was interested in no time, seeming to me a peñazo, by very good intentions you have. |
3,327 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3631 | Tito Chinchan | Starship Troopers: Héroe de la federación | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Unfortunate sequel where a group of soldiers are locked in a fortress, but the enemy instead of being outside is inside. By-product encompassed in serie B, I doubt that you like anyone to see that thinking that it is the second part of something. | Director: Phil Tippett. duration: hour and a half long, remember.Release date: May 18, 2004.Hoy have seen Ratatuille (as written) and at the end he speaks a food critic, commenting that after each creation, although your you can destroy it with your sharp verb, there is a team of people who have worked for her. This, is very cute if you see while mice do cooks and the family wins the hand of love, but if it happens to you when someone comes to sneak you a rehash cutrongo as a sequel to a film fresh, clever and witty script, you cabreas and not save on derogatory descriptions. In addition, that I am not a critic to salary, so say what gives me the win. EA.la film is the continuation of the first part (it seems obvious, but it could be a prequel or a saltacuela, i.e., I put the same name and I do what I get of the balls) where men are launching an offensive on a planet of bugs. No os espereis navecitas, or movement, everything that has happen happens in a kind of fortress of Tin, and the ship that comes at the beginning is nothing but a scene in the first movie. It's sad.I am quite outraged with this film. If it had been an original idea, without the name of a good movie followed by a gimmick, he would possibly her more kindly. But to make a sequel is presupposing that it will follow the storyline of the first. Or much less. This gives a twist to the serie B, touching if you want al gore, with moments of those that are not recommended for after dinner (except that give laughter). It's an agonizing atmosphere, that at no time curdled with a carrot in command, a girl believed rambo, a rambo believed harry the dirty, a general who has seen many movies West, and other purrielas who do this nothing more than an infamous product. ALE, as I said.In short, unfortunate sequel to the great Starship Troopers, where a group of soldiers are locked in a fortress, but the enemy instead of being outside is inside. By-product encompassed in serie B, I doubt that you like anyone to see that thinking that it is the second part of something.Cow poop.Besitos.P.D: A girl sleeps while attack you hundreds of bugs, millions of bullets are fired in his ear and nobody was surprised. Las palmas I know I do not touch. |
3,328 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/631 | José Córdoba | Pequeña miss sunshine | 4 | 5 | muchocine | An excellent, dramatic but fun, human, film shot and written with intelligence, demonstrating, once again, that the film does not require large budgets or was stories to reach the people. | Here we have the road movie of the year. With other genres like horror, comedy, road movies appear as one because, while they can frame normally in one of the genres masters, by calling them somehow, Yes is true that structure, for purposes, all calls road movies share characteristics. Little miss sunshine represents is an exemplary film in the genre. We have thus family protagonist, a set of losers (losers) so typical of American cinema: the father who has designed a methodology on how to reach success in nine steps and constantly awaiting a phone call confirming that his book will be published, the little girl obsessed with beauty contests plump, involving Grampathe depressed guy with trends suicide, teenage son constantly reads to Nietzche and takes nine months with a vote of silence and, finally, the mother, the character who tries to put a point of sanity in the matter. The trigger for the history is a child beauty pageant for which the small Olive has been chosen after a small carambola. As the economy is not buoyant, they decide to take all, although with reluctance, his filthy van and go two States of the United States of the America's deep South, before the girl get her dream of participating. As in all road movie, the fate is not important, but the journey itself same. The movie, which could be described with doses of comedy drama, revolves around the frustrations by not achieving success. The father is a man obsessed with being a winner, striving in that his method is foolproof, stubborn in refusing to acknowledge that he is a loser. This behavior affects all those who surround him, starting with their children, the teenager who hates his family of losers and wants to become a fighter pilot and the daughter who lives obsessed with beauty contests. The mother and grandfather opposed assume his stopover in society, although they have placed hopes on the girl child, in, at least she did make a triumphant. Meanwhile, the uncle, brilliantly played by Steve Carell, has taken the opposite step, it has gone from being a winner to be a loser. Despite the dramatic dyes the film is punctuated by a multitude of fun and hilarious, moments like this dilapidated van that ends up being one character from the movie or the child beauty pageant. The script is a success, the characters, despite their bizarre point, they seem close, understandable, human. Also presents a very suitable pace alternating comedy and drama, introducing innovative elements so that the fabric does not decay. The actors are very well, it shows that they have a good starting material and know get juice. From Greg Kinnear, bright as a father obsessed with the triumph, until Alan Arkin, a real robaplanos as the grandfather involving and addicted to porn. The address is also effective, without abusing the rapid Assembly and making great use of the panoramic format, a risky decision, with which the film has been shot. Get levels really very interesting, helped by excellent photography. The soundtrack is also very encouraging, many of their songs being instrumental arrangements of popular songs that add a fun and crazy point. In short, it's an excellent, dramatic but fun, human, film shot and written with intelligence, demonstrating, once again, that the film not required huge budgets or was stories to reach the people. Incidentally, for anti people studies, anti American cinema, this film winning several awards of independent cinema and the San Sebastian Festival audience award, it has been produced by a major Studio: 20th Century Fox, but it has been through a subsidiary Fox Searchlight. |
3,329 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3391 | Francisco Bellón | Elizabeth: La Edad de Oro | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Elizabeth: The golden age is a historical misrepresentation exercise as not seen in the film from the era in which Errol Flynn jumped in mesh around the screen. | In these times that since certain sectors is cry that it breaks Spain, the premiere of a movie like Elizabeth: the golden age will be doubly controversial. Perhaps for this reason, since Universal Pictures Spain have decided to change two sentences that appeared in the first folding trailer and replace them with less hurtful expressions. We say that it is doubly controversial because on its single tape give much to talk by its peculiar reading of the history. Yes, this is film, and even more, this is a film criticism and not a thesis on the history of late 16th century, but it is inevitable that the judgment on Elizabeth: the golden age is not deeply influenced by historical each viewer's notions. Firstly, it must be said that Shekhar Kapur not should not even know the expression historical accuracy, and even less its significance, and is that we strongly recommend that anyone who knows in depth history go to see the film, under penalty of severe mental or coronary disorders. The hagiographic treatment of Queen Elizabeth I was totally predictable (why if Mary continues to be Mary, Elizabeth I have to call her Elizabeth I?), as already happened in the original film, as it was hoped the ridicule of everything having to do with Spain, what contributes enthusiastically Jordi Mollà its unfortunate composition of Philip II. The tape has some scenes become pathetic, like the almost dreamlike and naïve implementation of Mary Stuart. The only positive points of Elizabeth: the golden age have their own name, and are Cate Blanchett, Geoffrey Rush, Clive Owen and Rhys Ifans.Elizabeth: the golden age is a historical misrepresentation exercise as not seen in the film from the era in which Errol Flynn jumped in mesh around the screen. Anyone who has a minimum historical notions will be swearing in Aramaic and cinema regretting deeply having wasted two hours of his life in such crappy. |
3,330 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1171 | Rafa Ferrer | Pequeña miss sunshine | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Film, tender, intimate, great, however, that fills us with much more than big studios and large budgets, astronomical and similar figures. | There are movies that we feel a series of fascination (why insofar as I write this word I remember an item of R.E.M. called Fascinating?) staff, a magic that surrounds them, films that have not a priori come accompanied by the time-tested and dare I call "sacrosanct" promotion campaign, those that we enter through the eyesthey crowd us the look and do we do finally fall into the temptation of viewing them although at first were not interested in them not going! I am referring to small films, tender, intimate, great, however, that fill us with much more than big studios and large budgets, astronomical and similar figures. And I want to talk about "Little miss sunshine" Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, who sincerely been my everything a film discovery and one of the great films of the past 2006. Winner of the prize of the public at the last festival of S.Sebastian and performed by Steve Carell, Toni Collette, Paul Dano, Greg Kinnear, Alan Arkin, Beth Grant, Abigail Breslin, sister of the young child actor Spencer Breslin. Once I've been able to watch her, I have to say that the film is amazing, of these that you fill from beginning to end, it is true that it is a wonder that surrounds you and not know how to express the impressive feeling that accompanies you, love, pleasure, complicity, affection towards the characters. However it is be there seeing how the things happen and enjoy like crazy with what is happening, slowly, slowly but surely. Finishing, do you a favor to the senses and take a look, certainly worthwhile! For once in life make you case and make me case! |
3,331 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/647 | Tito Chinchan | Crank | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Action since the born until he dies. Well developed and well clinched, only suitable for lovers of films of action and humor black and lumpy. | Read the entire host critique, without breathing, possibly running as an asshole and giving the biggest screams out. Accessory to break things.The film is a guy who gets up and sees that he has a DVD with TV. It gets and is that they have punctured you a very dodgy shit that you will send to suck less que canta a rooster to huevón click of the balls. Of a result which is lia to run and kill to find the asshole that she wants to Apollo and touch the badajo. Runs and runs, chinga and chinga until the bullshit of telefilmada that we see it completed and sales with desire to run and kill any child badly whilst bitch that you see on the street.Cagon mother who gave birth to the great crap of the shell of his mother, what movie more asshole shots, drugs, sex and music to all estrozo. Fucking son of screenwriter us puts squarely on the tape, with cane since the start. At the end we amaricona and seems well bitch shit, but hosts, which we will have to piss her, right? The story takes place between jeringuillazos adrenalíticos, shots of all types, cuts of hands, hack, fucked, blowjob and racing. And all of this box of these well grumosos partimientos ("do Te made a hand?") and well cinicotes, of which us like males with hairs on the Dick.In short, that I shit in the said to be that it gave birth to the son of the great shit he did is adrenalítica movie, that I had a putísima mother. I leave that I have to go to charge me bastards.In short again, jajajajajaja, I had to do so the criticism, I've not been able to resist. That film, that cane. Action since the born until he dies. Well developed and well clinched, only suitable for lovers of films of action and humor black and lumpy. I enjoyed as a dwarf, although the movie is not a wonder. And also well small!In conclusion, to say that I think that the writer you will give the letter K of the academia de la lengua, by fluid and careful language that uses. K Kagon your father son of the great bitch, of course. |
3,332 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1716 | Nüx | Paris je t'aime | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Film friendly and recommended, where we can find moments of a quality and dramatic richness excellent along with other very renqueantes within the narrative and rhythmic. | This film is the product of join eighteen stories set in each of the districts of the Gallic capital. In general, I thought it was a film extremely pleasant and entertaining, from treacly and forced romanticonas situations, as a priori one might assume. Different managers have taken the task seriously, detail and working their mini-obras to fund. The actors of the stature of Portman, Buscemi or Elijah Wood have achieved, likewise, connect with the audience in the record time that implies a short film.Firstly, I would stress the short film of the Coens, Tulleries, in which an innocent tourist, sitting on a bench of the subway will be mocked by a Parisian couple couple.Contrary to what expected, also find the short of Gus Van Sant, Le Marais, thought me of an exquisite taste. Therein a French boy believed to have found their soulmate abroad a boy that attends discourse that it excited, being aimed stunned and hieratic. The work of Tom Tykwer, with Natalie Portman as the protagonist, likewise, was one of them that I liked. Here is reflected the idea that true love able to overcome all borders that should stand.Another kind of love is that appreciate the Place des fêtes of Oliver Schmitz, curious name to call a short where the story revolves not only love but also surrounding the death; because even in these recent wind of life, love still present.Likewise, the Tour Eiffel of Sylvain Chomet deserves special mention. This is, in my view, the more fun and original shorts, in which tells the colorful story of love between two mimes misunderstood by society.The short film by Alfonso Cuarón, which reduces to the more than predictable conversation of a father with his daughter, found me one of the weak and most disappointing of all.In the same way, nor except the fury of my flamethrower of Christpher Doyle, Porte de Choisy, which I cannot say anything besides the fact that I did not understand. It is one of those incomprehensible shorts in essence that tend to be qualified as "alternative", "symbolic" or "conceptual".Perhaps you you ask what such of the Coixet. of the lot, more or less at the same level as the rest of them that I have not named.It is, in conclusion, a film friendly and recommended, where we will find moments of excellent along with other very renqueantes within the narrative and rhythmic quality and dramatic richness. |
3,333 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1471 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Pulse | 2 | 5 | muchocine | In the end. Entertaining film (hence no discussion) that is forgotten quickly. Everything should be in the vineyard of the Lord. If it weren't for the popcorn... | Few news recently brings horror to cast bells on the fly by the announcement of another product grown under the protection of the Japanese influence and pertrechado all the clichés of the genre without missing any. Press is not bad of solemnity. Nor is it good. And mediocre will be an adjective like next you long when one has come out of the film and think of cold what scam they have released. It is not badly made, without being well invoiced. You don't have a script of bells as much as the poster fill with enthusiasm by the bizarre image and the idea of metaphysical strain. The actors are not bright. Not bad. Mediocre is an adjective that comes as long when one has come out of the film and think of cold bla bla bla.The inclusion of a cyber threat gives a point of novelty that collapses immediately when the director (it is possible that does not have no idea of the name and that does not have any commitment to hear) launches fully to develop his story, which is short, which could give Yes case that overnight had fallen it the task of direct it. Wes Craven, Christophe Gans, still delighted with scares of Silent Hill?In the end. Entertaining film (hence no discussion) that is forgotten quickly. Everything should be in the vineyard of the Lord. Feel like then (that Yes) compensate for the error with some tape of more substance, of those who do not leave us and stick to the senses during several days. Apocalypto for this scribe this year. O El laberinto del fauno, to name a cuasinacional product. And lifetime Jezebel of William Wyler film, but this is good (how wonderful, how wonderful) which has this our Vice: to compensate us of loves lost with old loves. |
3,334 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3944 | Tito Chinchan | El equipo aahhgg | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Parody of the A-team film. As a film it is very bad, but as it is well set, know what you post to see her and has jokes of the bad guys that are making much laughter, so can be seen. For lovers of the genre. | Director: José Truchado Kings duration: 84 minutazos.Premiere: 1989.No is if I have spoken of the book that I have brought the Magi. Nothing less than "The guide of Spanish Cinema" a such Carlos Aguilar. It is basically an overview of all Spanish films in history, more than 6000. In the commentary for this film, throughout the book makes to give birth to Mariano Ozores, it goes on to say that if el cine de Mariano Ozores fits poorly with Mariano Ozores, imagine to José Truchado. Heh, heh, makes me laugh the commentary, which is partly right.The film is about a group of soldiers, after struggling in the war of the Viet Nam, engaged to sell as soldiers of fortune. Well, they really have different jobs, but it is my small tribute to the authentic team a. Total, which should help to one of his old company that is being harassed by a woman that sell you a horse. Script high standig, as you will see. By the way, the script is part of Antonio Ozores.El film the truth is supermalo, but to me these films make me grace. It has a very silly development, with many patochadas, but from time to time make a joke that you ries. Especially those of Antonio Ozores, which is a great gag humor. The characterization of the people of the parody is quite good, sobreactuada, but good. The scenery and costumes also resemble the original series.In short, film parody of the A-team. As a film it is very bad, but as it is well set, know what you post to see her and has jokes of the bad guys that are making much laughter, so can be seen. For lovers of the genre, of course.Besitos.P.D: Sharing comes "Bombi" than you will the younger does not have the remotest idea of who is.P.D.2: by cierto, strangely not get neither a tit;-) |
3,335 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3892 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Sé quien me mató | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Although end to start the year I dare to presage that it is going to be the worst tape ahead with a quality that almost no late to average telefilm. | What a joke of a movie. It is not that you do not hold or not it makes sense, it is posed I Know Who Killed Me is so shameful that when explained it at the end of the tape gives embarrassed.Lindsey Lohan plays on this occasion a typical young American: popular, pretty, talented and promising that it is suddenly kidnapped. When it appears half dead in a ditch is believed to be another person, a stripper's dark past. The police should do the recall because it is the only person who has escaped from captivity and the only clue to achieve capture the murderer is already recidivist in kidnapping and mutilation of other girls in the area.Yes, okay, we have seen it at other times, put some example saved with some commercial dignity for the collector of lovers, but what gives us this pseudo paranormal drama is more than anything else ridiculous. Not only the script da pena, in addition his poor performances are the perfect companion to accompany the fall of its leading young actress, probably chose the project under the influence of any psychoactive.Although end to start the year I dare to presage that it is going to be the worst tape ahead with a quality that almost no late to average telefilm. |
3,336 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3437 | Francisco Bellón | Villa Tranquila | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Quiet Villa is a fictional film which seems to a documentary, and although this scared many, is a fresh and different, which is addressed to that audience restless, Avid intelligent stories and tired of the artifice that lives the current film. | The current cinema, similar to the big studios tend to produce only films which in theory are a sure attraction for the box office, awards or critical, also are increasingly more willing eager filmmakers to make films transgressors, innovative or at least that are out of the ordinary. Taking advantage of this situation, there are also many pedantic directors who made films looking for strange thing for free.Jesús Mora belongs to the Group of eager filmmakers, and Villa Tranquila is his new work, a fictional story that seems more a documentary for the way in which it is shot, and above all, because the majority of actors appearing in it are interpreted themselves. At a glance, anyone might think that Villa Tranquila is a species of Buenos Aires version of city of God. However, Jesus Mora portrays this neighborhood on the outskirts of Buenos Aires with dignity and at no time looking for crime, poverty or drugs hype. The story is told with a pace slow, excessively in its first third, but this does not diminish its main virtue, realism and the positive and optimistic look that conveys.Quiet Villa is a fictional film which seems to a documentary, and although this scared many, is a fresh and different, which is addressed to that audience restless, Avid intelligent stories and tired of the artifice that lives the current film. |
3,337 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3089 | Andrés Pons | Carne muerta | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is clear that they are a group of friends which means practically amateurs made a feature film, which enjoyed some success on DVD and festivals. Small appreciation they deserve only because of the difficulty involved this type of product. | CONOR MCMAHON debuted in feature films with a couple of previous shorts starring the same actors who only have experience with this director. It is clear that they are a group of friends which means practically amateurs made a feature film I enjoyed some success in the DVD and festivals. Small appreciation they deserve only because of the difficulty involved this type of product.Another very different thing is practically non-existent quality in technical aspects. Makeup, photography, are of fireworks, does not help either poor interpretations of a wishful staff but really with zero quality.The strength lies in the originality of a little exploited script, mad cow Lions turning the population into ZOMBIES that attack plan. Al Gore resolves occasionally sorprendementé with dignity despite the poor media, the undead appear everywhere without giving Truce to survivors who maintain a fierce struggle giving a good pace at all times.A small production that keeps at least entertainment that makes it enjoyable, this Irish promises, then maybe with more resources in the future this trained to provide lightweight Divertimento solvents products among the most unabashed gore. A 6. |
3,338 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3594 | Andrés Pons | Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | US turns to offer a fun parody that starts the laughter of the audience from the start thanks to the freshness gives the director in a well developed script who knows how to take advantage of all their witty jokes. | It is back to collect the same team of actors, director, screenwriter of ZOMBIES PARTY parody films of action of pairs of policemen as used in HOLLYWOOD in for example the series lethal weapon among many others.Accompanied by former BOND Timothy Dalton or the winner of the oscar for iris Jim BROADBENT, us returns to offer a fun parody that starts the laughter of the audience from the start thanks to the freshness gives the director in a well developed script who knows how to take advantage of all their witty jokes.The actors have fun bringing needed humor to their crazy characters and incredible situations, only failing in the elongated unnecessary action scenes.Another hilarious comedy of a team that promises to provide many evenings of glory the comedy of high Couture. |
3,339 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3040 | Tito Chinchan | Perras callejeras | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Film kinki on a band of women in the Decade of 80 in Spain. Worst Infinítamente to its male version, can be seen, if only to be able to boast of having seen such tape. | The film of the 1980s in Spain was a true melting pot of styles and themes. From the films of social complaint, as "The crime of Cuenca" of the ill-fated Pilar Miró (Incidentally, that pathetic me is his son), until the despelote all already know. Making a hole between them, emerged that we could define as film kinki, which are histories of the suburbs of the large Spanish cities. Counting as exponent "Strays" tape, this director wanted to make a tribute (called arrimo my sardine to the Ember of others) and released this "street dogs" which has cost me a horror to find the given poster that has name of porn movie (perhaps I should see some of the latter).The film is about three girls (look like older paper interpreted) together to form a street gang and thus escape from the street with their drugs, beatings and prostitution. Things are going pretty well, until starting to think at levels higher, that does not cause them if not serious problems.It goes without saying that it is worthwhile to watch the movie to see the showcase of young breasts coming out, which are when the silicone was on the boards of the Windows. What level pechil, my mother. The argument is not that it is a wonder, but is not at all bad. The actors are a bit loose with some corrupt policemen that surprise you torrent, although we have some very good actor in minor roles. Dialogs are great, very old-fashioned, but great. For those who want to go through hard and actually are pure poetry. My average Zucchini was listening to the movie and I occasionally came to ask "Did say...?". Buenísimos. Resumiendo, film kinki on a band of women in the Decade of 80 in Spain. Worst Infinítamente to its male version, can be seen, if only to be able to boast of having seen such tape.A classic of the video store at the end of the 80.Besitos.P.D: "There are people who do things with his head." Other than with the heart. I nothing of the sort, I do by that asks me the pussy. Yes, Yes, fuck, what? "."Pd2: by the way, do the sexual act with underwear, what things. |
3,340 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/219 | Jesus Lens | Camino a Guantánamo | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The road to Guantánamo is one of those movies that justify, beyond the mere and lawful entertainment, which the Lumiere brothers invented this film. | In the past Berlin Festival, its release caused a sensation that the directors of the film, Michael Winterbottom and Mat Whitecross, were accompanied by the real protagonists of the film: three British Asian origin, to be at the least opportune place and at least suitable time, were arrested as jihadists protalibanes in Afghanistan and transferred to this kind of place anywhere that is Guantánamoan of the legal and humanitarian aberrations by which the beginning of twenty-first century will be marked in the history of infamy and the ignominy.The film has been presented as a documentary, but it is not. Nor it is intended to be so. The faces and voices of the real protagonists overlap actors who represent them in a spectacular and precise recreation of his Odyssey: in 2001, invited to a wedding in Pakistan, young and unconscious three somethings, thinking that the threats of the United States.UU. attack Afghanistan they would not materialize, they decide to travel to that country to take a look. They are stuck on full invasion, detained in Taliban territory and taken by followers of Bin Laden.Alternando the testimonies in first person of the real protagonists of history with its reconstruction drama, filmed in Iran, the film is visually very powerful, with these images that resemble the amateur video of a tourist who travels by land exotic and fascinating, border and in permanent tension. Later, the recreation of the detention camps in Kandahar, torture, Guantánamo. This is creepy, without that managers use no sentimental tricks to win public sympathy.It is enough for the simple description of a few facts and deplorable acts by who are considered defenders of democracy and which are only getting that, the mere vision of the stars and bars flag causes disgust, fear and shame. Combative cinema, committed, essential. |
3,341 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2104 | Ramón Balcells | Dame 10 razones | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A wonderful, small, but for anything simple and underestimated film, it certainly deserves more applause which he had received (well few). | I don't know the reason why I have always loved the road movies. And nor is it has seen many, but when I see some of them, it gives me a sense of brutal isolation. Give me 10 reasons (10 items or less, translating the original, much more suggestive title) is not that it is just a road-movie as which they are accustomed to seeing, but somehow, either because the two protagonists (almost absolute) van in a car for quite some time, or because the message of the film is like a journey by car. Whatever it is, seems what may seem, Brad Silberling film achieves what very few get (and very few try to): mix themes and do excellently in just 75 minutes.A surprising review appears in the poster: "You know who". The film, one way or another, been talking about this, precisely. Two rather isolated from the reality people (perhaps not so much as in the great Lost in Translation) they cross the path and, as they pass the hours of the day, van knowing more and more until you reach a mutual love. Thus, at a glance, the basic idea of the film may seem too classical, but I assure that Silberling beyond your own script to images with overflowing originality and sensitivity, so that it sometimes seems that you're with the protagonists living what they are experiencing. It may seem that of so short that it is the tape is less deep. Well gentlemen, not quite the opposite. Look, Spider-man 3 lasted about twice that give me 10 reasons, and this one, however, contains dose of intelligence and morals in abundance. And it is there need to know address, must be knowing how to write. And Brad Silberling, here, is a master (olvidémos their previous works, with the exception of the commitment!). Its fun and sad film has several really wonderful scenes, such as when the two protagonists are asking each other "ten items or less" (those 10 things they like and that not of his life). There, in that wonderful sequence, is you can appreciate the personality of both, their intentions, their fears, their concerns and learn, incidentally, a little about his own life, on their particularities (albeit a toaster). The film is at all times realistic, human, and no longer carried away by the typical winks of American independent films (here are great, but a little topical, little Miss Sunshine, which undoubtedly is, in general, more good film that Slibering, for reasons already described). There are scenes that are not only fun, but they are also masterfully shot, as the Freeman talking with everyone in the hiper-mercado or the same insulting the microphone of the first supermarket.Give me 10 reasons would not give me 10 reasons if not they would have interpreted these two ACEs of the interpretation: Morgan Freeman and Paz Vega. Can it what you expected? Because it's always: melancholic eyes, suggestions that you also affect tí (I mean to the public), and unforgettable phrases as the last. And on the other hand, I at least, it did not expect much. And fortunately, me I brought a pleasant surprise to see that the unbearable niñata of the other side of the bed knows act without scream. The chemistry that develops between them two is formidable, totally unusual to be two players of very different ages and sizes. Stress, above all, the daunting dialogue at the end, where both muestrans its facets more dramatic and romantic at the same time.A wonderful, small, but for anything simple and underestimated film, it certainly deserves more applause which he had received (well few). The two protagonists are undoubtedly superb and the dialogues that maintain should be heard more than once. And is that you give me 10 reasons not only surprised but that also you glad the day. |
3,342 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/745 | Beatriz Perez | Los fantasmas de Goya | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The character of Goya is non-existent, i.e. does not look anything. It is an excuse to give a title with packing adventures story. | Doing a couple of games of words we can say that Milos is not shaped and Goya does not look anything. Seven years after the appreciable, even pretentious, though?Do man on the Moon?, and decades after?Amadeus? and?Does one flew over the cuckoo's nest?, the Czech director returns with a nonsense of such dimensions that it is difficult to decide where to start to bring Manus to head:?The Goya's ghosts? (?(Do do Goya? s Ghosts?, 2006). Yesterday premiered in Madrid cinemas and tomorrow reaches the general Billboard. Perhaps the errors begin with the character of Goya is non-existent, i.e. it does not look anything. It is an excuse to give a title with packing adventures history which could be located in any other time. If only it was that and at a secondary level, very well, but is that above dare to show him as a buffoon that presence, without getting involved, the time that live you. His character is not that it lacks depth or motivation: simply does not exist, and you can do little Stellan Skarsgård (do the two new versions of?)The Exorcist?,?(Do the Caribbean Pirates: dead man's chest?) to fix it. Before well, convert to the temperamental Aragonese in a funny pintamonas and temperament. In addition, its clearly Scandinavian physicist achieved only provide more improbability for their anemic performance. But the fundamental problem, once again, is the script. The treated story is the classic 19th century Feuilleton of Fourth Division. Ya are us classics of the 19th century stultifying today in day?The Goya's ghosts? It is one even greater simplicity. The twist of script with which the conflict of the film arises is the most absurd that has seen in years and, as if that outside, the interpretation of Portman still leaves it more ridiculous. The thing is as follows: willing to "clean up Spain" according to the teachings of brother Lawrence (Javier Bardem), the henchmen of the Inquisition will a Madrid tavern where repaired in the curious behavior of Inés (Natalie Portman). This behavior is that, when they provide a succulent segovian suckling pig for dinner, she refuses with a grimace of posh girl that is neither credible nor is well performed. If foreign, it could react this way, but being Spanish, we would have seen this dish sometimes. A grimace that would make even Lindsey Lohan in?I want to be superfamosa?. So, seeing the inquisitors that she refuses to eat pork, come to the conclusion that it is a heretic who practiced rites judaizers. Or that is what he wants to make us believe the script. In fact stop her for being such a bad actress: when, seconds later in the same scene, want to do the "place" kissing the feet of a dwarf, the improbability is greater than if seriously Pamela Anderson to collect the prize Nobel. How Natalie Portman, who only knows a role has credibility as an actress, is something that goes beyond me. While still need to explain why Keira Knightley is superb in?Pride and prejudice? Leaving aside the bad acting, the problem lies in that it makes no sense that her stop why, is a twist of forzadísimo script.But the worst of the script is not mental simplicity of the story or its thick outline. The worst thing is that, for having "importance", also is take hand in hand with the history of Spain during the fifteen years covering the film. Obviously a stupid and simplistic story needs a historical context to simplify the history of Spain far as the insulting folklore.The first insult begins to focus the story on the Inquisition. While it is true that it is a relevant part of the history of Spain that does not feel particularly proud, it is also true that perpetuates the topic Anglo-Saxon Spain = Inqusición, so successful as to say that the history of England is summarized in the extramarital adventures of Charles and Diana. Secondly, simplify all the reforms that brought the invasion by Napoleon to leave them reduced to "a group of Lords very, very, but very bad, firing to the priests at mass". Thirdly, the expulsion of the French and the coronation of Ferdinand VII is sold as an instantaneous process that allowed the Spaniards to return to its authentic be: scream "Live the caenas!" and reinstate the Inquisition which we liked so much. If you want to ignore me, try to support which is probably the worst movie of the year and alucinen with the following number of things: the dual role of Natalie Portman, making crazy and disfigured mother and prostitute daughter it. Another trick of cheap script that makes that Natalie Portman will be found, a conveniently abandoned baby. How bad is the portrait that Goya painted by Javier Bardem. Pathetic "montage scenes" that are using paintings of Goya. One thing is that, as a Convention, we accept that English speak when in theory they are talking about Spanish or French, but then, why do we suddenly hear screaming in these languages?Only the work of the "dialogue coaches" saves: all Spanish players have a more than decent English accent. Do otherwise, things like?The Goya's ghosts? and?Alatriste? only give more greatness to which, against all odds, has risen as the best mega (co) production Spanish historical and adventures of the year:?The Borgia?. Do always assuming that?The labyrinth of the Faun? is in a different category.Should it have been titled?The daughter of the chaquetero?, in honor of the character played by Javier Bardem, true protagonist of the film and almost only thing salvageable from it. |
3,343 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1680 | Tito Chinchan | Extraños en un tren | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Essential classical film. Hitchcock us dips in the anguish of a poor man who sought only to separated from his wife and ends up becoming his life in hell. Tremedo clasicón. | Alfred Hitchcock, of which I will always remember the fear that I gave with the movie the birds, had a habit of leaving in all of his films. In a papelín helper, but always left. Well it seems to me, but man, perhaps a little more should select their roles. This comes up the train and give us a map of the butt of this gentleman that I doubt it is your best profile. If I were him, I would always draw in jacuzzis surrounded by ladies in leather and drinking champagne between her breasts, though he was the movie of birds, ja, ja, ja.The film is about two strangers who know casually on a train. One is a famous tennis player, is on the rise, the other a heavy fan heir to the first. Total, they engage in conversation and at any given time, the Crown tells him that if he kills women's tennis player, this must kill his father. It is the perfect crime, given that there is nothing that related crimes, and much less do suspect to the police who have been them. The tennis questions, but worse than the no.¿Que heir can tell this humble server on one of the masterpieces of cinema? The movie I really liked, but since then he notices it has age of retirement (56 Anita nothing less). The idea is superb, putting on the table a problem very well developed and executed. The actors do wonderful, and photography is very effective, aided by the soundtrack. But it also has things that give a bit of laughter, given that old it would be "evil" but now are childish. For example, to show us how bad is the heir, not think something else click the globe to a child. Muahahahaha, that is the sound made by the evil to the laugh.In short, essential classic film. Hitchcock us dips in the anguish of a poor man who sought only to separated from his wife and ends up becoming his life in hell. Tremedo clasicón. |
3,344 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2436 | Alex Largo | Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix | 4 | 5 | muchocine | To me, the truth, has caused me a pleasant surprise to know that this saga still has something to offer us. | Little is expected of this franchise whose unique (and blatant) objective was to squeeze the maximum fever by the teenage Wizard. Very little gave us the first part, child like few and, in my opinion, quite sosa. The second, although more dark not gave us a great movie. And the third. Let's say that the third was a "turning point" for the series. Suddenly a man appeared (the by all known Alfonso Cuarón) took many liberties with the plot and got a few scenes which, although good, a little desentonaban (occasionally with shoehorn). All films of the young Wizard has good and bad things, but the third had very good things (Alfonso Cuarón showed us (and we again demonstrate with the magnificent "sons of the men") was a director as the top of a pine and we offer a magnificent scene, the trip to the past) and things tremendously bad (the design of production left a lot to be desired)(, as well as the script). The fourth, although took liberties with the original plot of the book, was a pleasant and entertaining, movie only, exclusively that. Entertaining. Why is he could expect little of this fifth installment of Harry Potter. Imagine my surprise when today, in a Madrid press pass, the film offered me over (done muchísmo) than expected. Only the appearance of the logo of the Warner already makes it clear that the film is going to be much darker than the others. The logo, as the title appears in a whitish haze, and basically, what appears to be the prophecy. The film starts with Harry in the Park and discussion with Dudley. This scene serves more to remind us of the end of the fourth that for anything else. And then begins the movie. The movie takes a frenetic pace without pause from the Dementors attack. Although omitted large amount of details (and some really important, such as the fact that Petunia remembered the Dementors) the film offers the best scenes of the book with total consistency (something that was missing in an alarming way in the third and fourth). Arrival at Grimauld Place is curious, and in just 6 minutes condenses us everything that happens before the arrival at Hogwarts without let's lack great thing. Once arrived at Hogwarts we occurs quickly and in a very concise way to Dolores Umbridge, with a personality a tad exaggerated with respect to the book. The Dumbledore army gains importance with respect to the book and is very faithful to the idea of the book, even the change of "traitor" with respect to the book is completely consistent with a couple of new small details. Everything follows its normal course until we reach the end. The battle of the Ministry. Since the arrival to the Hall of prophecies until the end David Yates tells us, although with little experience, he knows much about this. Indeed, the entire scene that takes place in the Ministry is frankly superior to any scene in the series. Spectacular, dark and emotional. Since the attack of the death eaters in the Hall of prophecies, the battle in the Hall of the veil and the battle of Dumbledore and Voldemort. Frankly a few minutes that make that entry already worthwhile. The final scene of Dumbledore and Harry is very small and explanations are conspicuous by their absence, although, probably, those who have not read the novels not cast them in lack. No doubt the "culprit" that this delivers whatever is David Yates. Man faces the challenge of adapting the book longer and with more details with enthusiasm and desire (something that was missing in my view to Mike Newell), but above all with talent. I do not even come to think of the mess that could have been conducted if another director would have been at the forefront of this film. Yachts gives us a very good work after the cameras doing some moments resulting from the most emotive while the film has a devilish pace (too much for some). Highlight the amazing work being done at the end of the tape, especially with the battle of Voldemort and Dumbledore. A scene which, although in the book works very well, was very difficult to that function in the same way in the film. Picking up some elements of the book (the snake, the bubble of water.), David, gives us a scene entertaining and personality a palpable throughout the footage. The script on this occasion was carried out by Michael Goldenberg, who had just written 3 scripts before this, although it is not magnificent, is correct. Goldenberg, unlike Steve Kloves, synthesizes the dialogues, not the plot. What I mean, is that Kloves was more given to delete scenes. Goldenberg, almost all scenes of the book are in the movie, but, in return, has eaten large amount of details, for example, and perhaps the most unforgivable failure is that at no time was reveals the name of the person who pronounced the prophecy nor of which heard (Yes, is may sound strange but it is). Another totally different world are the actors. As a general rule, say that with respect to the book, the characters have very few changes and are very well reflected on screen. Daniel Radcliffe, Harry Potter: although it improves their performance with respect to the "Goblet of fire" (although there directly not acted) is not to throw rockets, but perhaps more surprising is that, in the final leg, his performance in no time strident, although during the footage "enjoying" a couple of moments that pulls any theory to keep serving in a position to land. As I said, his role in the last section, is more than passable (and there may be who say you do well). Although there is a moment during the possession of Voldemort, that. well, the truth, no one could have dropped this speech with little grace. Emma Watson, Hermione Granger: although to be unfairly branded bad actress, anyone who understand a little of the matter may not deny that his character in a brilliant way embodies. Watson makes us give a tremendously charismatic character with the new nuances that Hermione presented in the fifth book. Rupert Grint, Ron Weasley: although with slightly less prominence than usual, the case of Rupert is exactly the same than Watson, in fact, Trio protagonist, Emma and him are acquiescing with more note that Radcliffe, although improved, did not reach the level of these two. Michael Gambon, Albus Percial Wulfric Brian Dumbledore: as always, Gambon is superb. But rather than talk about the work of Gambon I like to talk about his character, a character who suffered a terrible change of personality and was turned into a clown in "The prisoner of Azkaban" and "The Goblet of fire" was somewhat dazed. Here, Dumbledore, returns to resemble the Dumbledore of Richard Harris, although with small amendments to not be too strident with respect to the previous. Ralph Fiennes, Lord Voldemort: without any doubt the best of the tape. Those who disliked the teatricalidad of Fiennes in "The Goblet of fire", they will have to swallow the words this time. The appearance of Voldemort in the movie is really wonderful. These effects of smoke in the face of Voldemort give necessary force the character to star in the best scene of the series. A scene (I mean the fight) where Fiennes does so many fuss as it did in the fourth. Although not thought that Yates was going to surprise it has done, and one of the causes is Lord Voldemort, which, as you can already see is better than ever. Imelda Staunton, Dolores Jane Umbridge: bad, twisted, sadistic. This is the character that gives us Staunton. Although, as I have said, something more exaggerated (mainly because it was more than necessary in this installment soon outline the characters), but at the end and after Umbridge. And that I was one of those not wanted in the role. Gary Olman, Sirius Black: though does not appear too, Black appears necessary so the end makes sense. Oldman offers us his talent in an outstanding manner as the godfather of Harry Potter and looking better than in "the prisoner of Azkaban", where, in a couple of moments sobreactuaba a little. Evanna Lynch, Luna Lovegood: without a doubt, not could have elected someone better, and it is that Evanna is Moon, at first can seem more crazy than normal (or at least in Original version seems it), but as the film progresses we find a very faithful portrait of moon. Also highlight the role of Luna in the film, as were many who feared that it ended being a flat character, but no, dedicate you their time and ends up being a character taken directly from the book. Now let's the characters with less footage and minor in General. Alan Rickman (Severus Snape) great, as it was in the first, the second, the third and the fourth. In this installment, Rickman shows us a facet more serious and "violent" Snape, especially in the scenes of Oclumancia. The character Filch stays along the same lines as in "Goblet of fire", that is used as a buffoon, but not in a way so sad and so degrading to character as happened with the fourth film, where the character Filch was mistreated. Here Filch is taken directly from the pages of the book and starred in some of the best gags. Neville has less prominence than expected, and although it tells us the misfortune of his parents and the motivations of Neville to improve does not have as many minutes on screen as for example moon. Tonks, somewhat bland, although the viewer congenia quickly with the character of Natalia Tena, appears very little and his name appears only named in passing on a couple of occasions. Bellatrix, although not enjoying great prominence, remains well profiled enough and so you hate, and Helena does a great job (and passes it on pipe) playing this woman who is truly crazy. Trelawney is something more round than usual, and quite more disadvantaged as it was in the third film, although, as I have said, the character is faithful to the book. And now, ending with others who are "behind the scenes": Nicholas Hooper, a great unknown in the world of the scoring to break into the scene with a great soundtrack that will delight in the film, providing great force to some moments. Special effects are really impressive, and the scene of the Ministry is what it is, in part, thanks to the superb special effects. Highlight to Grawp (who by the way is very but very well) and the effects of smoke (attention to the battle of the veil) in the order of the Phoenix, the death eaters and Voldemort. Another noteworthy aspect is the brilliant work of the production design team. That they do an incredible job, from new and fascinating creatures of the world of the boy wizard until the decorations of the Ministry, frankly stunning. To me, the truth, has caused me a pleasant surprise to know that this saga still has something to offer us. |
3,345 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3809 | Andrés Pons | August Underground | 1 | 5 | muchocine | There are other two continuations you miss by the same team and the third is the best because the delayed learned that it should leave the still camera so that at least we know what happens. | Sometimes I say, why not me along with four crackpots and shoot something? Do not I have no idea of directing? So what?I could shit on top of a type and then force him to eat her own shit, also we get if the situation so requires in a residence. We violaríamos some elderly women, we vomitamos them above, also eaten the vomiting.Since then nothing of script, so noticeable that it is amateur apparently gives very bad feeling neither assemble and distribution or anything at all. The camera will move as if fastened by a lame monkey.After some Nutter network will discover you, then I encumbrará author of cult, a type that without a budget and with other psychopaths to made a work of art.That is what happens with FRED VOGEL and his colleagues, not disgusts me the mutilation, shit, vomiting or violations of the film, the nene has already seen mondos of all kinds, sagas GORES as GUINEA PIG, swallow me and no need to bicarbonate. Maybe this quite sick or simply not it impresses me as nothing, but I am still not so bad to do this and believe me director.¿Saben what really disgusts me? What really shocked me and made me vomit? As a piece of meat with brain filled with shit say director if same as some talk of these terrorists and regarded as them filmmakers.It is not film, it has no script or anything to grab, it has no actors, it has no music and has not the slightest glimmer of human intelligence, that is shot by a few animals wanting to give the note, precisely this kind of people are what give bad name Al Gore because the garbage with a head does not give them to think that in that genre also occasionally you need to have something to tell.There are other two continuations you miss by the same team and the third is the best because the delayed learned that it should leave the still camera so that at least we know that pasa.¿Saben? They are considered authors of worship, some things are still beyond my mind. |
3,346 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3948 | Ramón Balcells | 1408 | 2 | 5 | muchocine | This is probably one of the biggest disappointments of the previous year. That heche to tremble Hafström if Kubrick resurrects... | Stephen King has been brought to the film on numerous occasions. Some of them have been a failure. 1408 isn't directed by Stanley Kubrick, that much is clear, but it is not sufficient excuse to not reach a level minimally well. It is, for the most part, disappointing. John Cusack never me has fallen especially well. Samuel l. Jackson Yes. Undoubtedly personal, the problem is that the latter appears little more of ten minutes, and the other during the film, although its presence does not end bother me at all. I see enough reason as to not have caught me in its seemingly interesting plot premise. Yes, the beginning is pretty good, but as he is advancing, the script will decline (and the room also). It is a film that has its moments (if not them bit him would be to be a real crappy), but most of them are or topical or meaningless. His biggest problem, undoubtedly, is the lack of suspense after the viewer has seen that anything can happen. From the resuscitation of the protagonist after die knifed (is only an example) the average wild fauna in the happy room appearance. All can occur, and thus it is impossible to believe her. And the script? Ducks, incoerente, bad, very bad. This is probably one of the biggest disappointments of the previous year. That heche to tremble Hafström if Kubrick resurrects. |
3,347 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3269 | Estesoyo | El número 23 | 1 | 5 | muchocine | The curse of the 23. By the time that he heard anything so stupid. Because of course, if you take your date of birth, her divides by 23, he sums multiplied by x 23 and subtractions you 23,000 and get you 4 more so it fits... you get 23! Uncle, is for shit is. | It is a strange film, this gimmick, as it is marked by the presence of the known and histrionic actor Jim Carrey. This tipejo has won the life (well since then, won because he has made a Fortune) doing all kinds of grimaces and antics, with greater or lesser grace. It is one of these actors makes humor by exhaustion. As these kids who do not stop do you grimaces and cuddle until exhausted you spend them a smile to make you stop in peace the fuck up. This type is the same. All the while putting faces, until it achieves that by pure weakness you escape a smile. Never occurred to me to see one of his movies again.Well, because the weary of Carrey, as it is already lined, now insists on that he wants to be an actor. There is who has been compared with Jerry Lewis, also made deplorable comedies in its infancy but then gave us a masterful interpretation. Found only in its beginnings: regrettable and a shame for the history of cinema. Carrey later insists in dramatic roles, with more penalty than glory.Here is a psychological thriller, or it seems at first. The story goes a guy who reads a novel that narrates his own life, that Yes, from a point of view fantastic and full of action in which is seen as a great success of private detective (in reality is dedicated to hunting animals loose around the city, go shit work by Jove!). In the book it is trapped by a curse related to the number 23 which begins to affect him in his real life. Here he painted well, and already was I thinking. is it possible that this clown has done something interesting? Well not. The story follows.The story follows. but the ideas were exhausted. Immediately sees that the book or his wife has written to try to return it crazy or has written the because it was mad. All comes down to the research of the author, which is in fact himself, by the family (including teen crio). That Yes, all well watered with a delusional surrealist: the curse of the numbers is no not lying women hiding corpses in the Park, the protagonist turns out to be amnesiac and nobody knows his past. Amazing uncle. This reminds me of the novels of Agatha Christie, in which at the end came a distant relative that had not appeared at this time and was the murderer. Shit decent of living with the rest of this website. The thing is that the guy is loaded to a girl at the University and was amnesiac of the scare. As his father was accounting, stay marked by numbers, in particular the 23, you see your. Then redo his life and married the first girl that is, it is also a goat as it seems. The thing has its charms, see for parties: 1) the curse of 23. By the time that he heard anything so stupid. Because obviously, if you choose your date of birth, her you divides by 23, add you multiplied by 2 23 subtractions le 23,000 and get you 4 more so it fits. you get 23! Uncle, is for shit is!(2) The mysterious amnesia. But as a pussy you can be married to a guy 17 years without knowing it is a crazy murderer? Damn, and with a son and everything. Above to protect him (sends eggs) is to unearth the victim of her husband so that they are not included. (I guess that being one with little knowledge of American culture did not know these ancestrales.3 costrumbres) search. Meet a former psychologist who treated him and see him. the neck was slit to not talk to him. ?¿. I hallucinate. I can not think anything to comment on, I was super-pasmado. It should be in the dictionary section for explanation of 'without rhyme or reason'. (4) The end: the guy comes and goes to jail. I tell you if you even thought to go see her. Do not uncle, is very bad.Joel Schumacher did, among others: last call, hidden young, Uun day of fury, a pair of Batman, anyway. especially action and pretty mediocre. But this now takes the award lifetime truño: mega-truño. After a career filled with movies, at least now we have clear which is the worst of all that they lapped.About the actors, the thing is funny. The son of the chalao they practically or focus, comes all the time in the background, and women take out especially when you are telling the story of the detective. and the truth is that it gains enough in picardias or Nightgown. But nothing, everything revolves around the Carrey, not just do neither well nor badly. Taking the pasta has the uncle the first thing that should be done is to select a good story and not trash like this. The truth is that you neither being more optimistic that I can save is shit of film. Total, other truño, another zero. |
3,348 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4039 | José A. Peig | La vida de los otros | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Film that combines with enormous ease various manifestations of human life into a coherent whole: feelings, ideology, power and influence, the intimate to the institutional, love and hate, trust and betrayal, beauty and art front of manipulation and oppression. | The coldness of a Machiavellian profile gives the sensitivity of the man which is what I wanted in a way forbidden by the laws of a secular theocracy step. The transformation is one of the reasons that better serve the explanation of the human fact, and here, the character known as Gerd Wiesler is a remarkable example of metamorphosis that operates from the intimacy and in reaction to an oppressive atmosphere. The construction of the character is a matter of creating environments and psychosocial contexts, not so much of outline its idiosyncrasies. Please take this as a good example. Little we know, really, about Gerd Wiesler, and this unknown area we find the best description of its multidimensional nature. The subtle narration implies omit the relevant meaning in the text base to let the implicit drama stay expressed in a set of interconnected phenomena. We don't need the text to explain the interior of the central character State, which would be his "objectification", simplifying the complexity of the drama. HGW and Gerd Wiesler are two signs that allude to a same story in different facets and dramatic meanings. Real humanity behind the institutional identity. In the early sequences, and through the expressiveness in the eyes of Ulrich Mühe, the expression of slavery was established in a hieratic profile. The flat end shows the released man. The expressiveness of the eyes of the actor is one of the dramatic centres throughout the footage. The eyes of Ulrich are interpretation and the feeling before the description of the Communist Germany, to whose sordidness and coldness is the austerity of the photography and the Mise en scène. Art (music, poetry) plays a crucial role in this metamorphosis evening between spying and loneliness. The speech renquea in Mannerist land: above the homeland and the ideology of this beauty. But at the end, rises in the last portrait of Gerd by buying the book which confirms - and you can see it expressed in its pages - their humanity, the end of an era and the beginning of another. Film that combines with enormous ease various manifestations of human life into a coherent whole: feelings, ideology, power and influence, the intimate to the institutional, love and hate, trust and betrayal, beauty and art front of manipulation and oppression. It is possible that you finf a certain Manichaeism, but this single trial indicates an attribute unavoidable if we look at the features of the story. We speak of Manichaeism when reality is simplified in two poles that do not transcend the topical idea. Florian Henckel Donnersmarck film, on the other hand, exposes all psychological and sociopolitical keys that justify and argue the characterization and development of characters placed in their corresponding fields. |
3,349 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2502 | Oscar Cantero | A golpes | 2 | 5 | muchocine | An offense free youth already itself has quite a few problems, and who does not deserve a paniaguado of State subsidies to come to stigmatize her. | With a title like this, and with the initial scenes, one well could imagine is to a film that revolves around the world of boxing. Nothing further from the truth.Shock is a social drama which chronicles the experiences of a group of girls to the vicissitudes of the life of the humble people, decide to devote to dock jewelry stores and other shops. A great example.With a simpleton, diffuse and weakly assembled argument, the film unfolds with difficulty, shuffling a final neither expected nor is expected, because the more approaches, less matter to a boring spectator.Giving an abhorrent picture of the humble and young people, the film uses all possible topics, probably because the charge for the script of this production is far from the world that seeks to portray; It is the only explanation I can find for so much free offense to a youth which already has quite a few difficulties to succeed a subsidized and paniaguado of the State come to stereotype her.Nothing to argue from the point strictly technical of the film, while in the interpretative aspect, the correction is the dominant note. Neither can be a much better these wicker basket.They will then tell you that Spanish Cinema triumphs not by fault of publishers, viewers, cinemas, etc. It is certainly the easiest, because much harder for these liberals of grout would recognize their inability to connect with the public and tell stories interesting and real and not canned junk written with the only desire to charge the Government aid. |
3,350 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2427 | JLO | El crimen del padre Amaro | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A small disappointment. By both rejuvenated and now strong new Mexican cinema, and the topic of this film gave for some more. | A small disappointment. By both rejuvenated and now strong new Mexican cinema, and the topic of this film gave for some more. Light years from the surprising at the time Amores Perros (Pulp Fiction to the Mexican) with the point of a Gael Garcia Bernal this time too loose or unconvincing in the role of father Amaro, a naive and malleable priest.Corruption within the bosom of the Church and its power (too similar already within the scope of a political party) is known to all (even by the own faithful) here reduced to a simple problem of skirts. Nothing new under the Sun with memories in mind more strong as Camila or El bird sings to death.The problem here is not the script (which in truth not spare you nothing) but the cinematic look, almost without view of depth, as a fact to the light and more like a soap opera that evening at a movie with glimpses of complaint. It tells father Amaro within the church growth and the discovery of things not so sanctas and its subsequent decline, renouncing the celibacy in the hands of a beautiful parishioner. Unrealistic characters in unreal situations, with side barely or poorly outlined. A guerrilla priest, an inept Mayor to say enough is enough, the same Amaro passing of naive to amoral in five minutes. Another example of how free is the character of a humble old man that occurs in the first few minutes, and that briefly reappears towards the end without any apparent justification. Its director, Carlos Carrera seems to take the text of Portuguese Queiroz (1896) too faithfully in its tone, flat and without explosion unless by some isolated scenes (returning to the meaningless) as those of a sick child or a hospital bleeding.Well managed that Yes, the grim aspect of a chapel of the town with its overabundance of images and whiff to business and a pronounced nihilism from beginning to end. Only its non-conformist meaning is the apparent reason for existence of this film. Amen. |
3,351 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/845 | Kiko de España | El ilusionista | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Who has been the luminaries of the New York Post stating that it is one of the best films of the year? | Boring, pompous, poorly performed? disappointment in the a priori interesting the illusionist fledged.Fat disappointment because there is only something worse than a bad movie: a movie bad and pretentious.This history? from a magician that? well? does going for? there a? flashback?There is argument nor the actors seem to be enjoying their work: Eduard Norton was never so bad (well, in The Score can if) and that if, as novelty offers an interpretation of the Steven Seagal school, that way of frown; Paul Giamatti should have a hole in your agenda, Sewell takes a ridiculous mustache and the Biel? leaves.Photography isn't all prodigious one expects, and the soundtrack of the Philip Glass alguno tries to look like Mr. M (add him a red hood also if you want to?), causing a surfeit of epic proportions in the Viewer.There is no emotion, or a more or less solid plot, and it shows horrors that unlike The Prestige, which was based on a novel by consistent, this one is based on a short story and if what I say is that this story would give for a single episode of The Twilight Zone rather than presenting a arrogant and sosavery bland movies for those who like their mothers.As El Zorro, but without action and humor, this is a serious and prestigious movie. Who has been the luminaries of the New York Post stating that it is one of the best films of the year?Do and indeed, of la moraleja which is sensed, best or speak, but suspect that the screenwriter is a type of dubious morality? It is so sadder that it is not worth compared with Christopher Notan. No I was bored so much in a cinema from Wolf, that gem of terror perpetrated Mike Nichols makes a few añazos. One of the several absolute of the season that has come before the other? |
3,352 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1110 | Plissken | Candida | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It ñoña, disjointed and boring, but it is worth seeing in action to the Candida. | The universe of Javier and Guillermo Fesser is the most atypical of our filmography. From 'That ritmillo' or 'The secdleto of the tdompleta' until 'El milagro de p. Tinto' have been able to build a kind of giant comic book where the man of the canister, the bungling, the Martians and the Narrator type NO-DO have an own entity, and the tontorrón and naïve humor disguises of surrealism and is highly effective. All this is to say that, Yes, I love the Fesser film work until 'p. Tinto' However, when they go out of their territory, the results considerably lower. 'Adventure of Mortadelo and Filemón', despite its brilliant appearance, went from being a collection of vignettes that reached to stun the painted. And 'Candida' repeated the same mistakes, more added one: the address is borne by Guillermo Fesser, who is clearly the least gifted of the two brothers to get behind the camera. The truth, pass the hipervitaminado pace and shantytowns of one to the parsimony and lack of Audacity to the other would already be enough to think this movie. But, unfortunately, there is more.The argument of 'Candida' could be as simple as "Forward things that happen to a lady that has to get his family to base of mopping floors". Because, simply, the narrative as such does not exist. Javier Fesser adapting the book by the endearing home employee catch-up, with a plot excuse I guess is based on the relationship between Candida and Guillermo Fesser (in the film become a stressed and antipatiquísimo anchor A3TV, poorly portrayed by Jorge Bosch), but ends up being more incredible that the saga of the p. Tinto. It features characters to then forget them, after releasing a couple of jokes about them. It unnecessarily lengthens the resolution of the plot, up to scratch in the fussiness. Try us to sell the story of redemption and never goes beyond the story of a few snobs with a bad conscience. I have not read the book, but really the life of Candida not does for more?The chapter of interpretations, better not speak. One assumes the amateurism of the protagonist (even so, which is more airy leaves) and several side, but really what Jorge Bosch has no name. To Raúl Peña (former UPA Dance) gives credibility to his junkie with four tricks everyone can apply to that type of character, we are or not actors. But it is what the that Bosch is painful, Furthermore he being the character with which the average viewer should identify.And having said all that, it could say that it is one of the worst movies that I have missed in the face in a long time. As you see, it is not the case. Simply because Candida, that character that rescued his gray anonymity Gomaespuma, rises above everything bad that has its "biopic" and get what they could not get or Viggo Mortensen in "Alatriste", for example: forget everything bad and laugh not she, but their peculiar vision of life. And that you do not leave the room with sense of manifest fraud. And forgive all the blunders at least for nearly two hours, to its around. Candida (and with it, all the Cándidas in the world have been) deserved tribute, certainly, but much better than this one.It ñoña, disjointed and boring, but it is worth seeing in action to the Candida. 5. |
3,353 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4190 | Carlos Giacomelli Puig | Los Crímenes de Oxford | 2 | 5 | muchocine | It is not to be wrong... not good. This is simply one bland thriller more, right, but those who fall into oblivion hopelessly as just its projection. A penalty. | After four years away from the big screen ("Crime Ferpecto" was their last release, as "The children's room" premiered on television as part of the "movies for No sleep"), Álex de la Iglesia returns with his more orthodox work to date and, therefore, more impersonal. Counting with renowned actors such as Elijah Wood, John Hurt and Leonor Watlting, "The crimes of Oxford" is a thriller based on the eponymous book by Guillermo Martínez. Mucho leads talking of "The crimes of Oxford", movie that finished awakening so much expectation before its premiere as views contrasted after him. On the one hand are those who defend it with the best work of the Church to date, while on the other are those who think just the opposite, it is one of the worst (if not the worst) film director.I, honestly, I dare not say that it is as below, for example, "Perdita Durango", although yes I can say is that I was more disappointed.And it isn't because the peculiar director has shelved its personality filming a thriller quite vulgar and current. The fact that sometimes a director to part their hallmark and roll something completely different from what we are accustomed does not have to be negative (as did David Lynch in, for example, "A history true").The problem of "The crimes of Oxford" is that it is not a good movie. It has many elements that certainly avoid that it becomes a failure total and absolute, as they could be a design of sober and elegant production, the performance of John Hurt, or some specific scenes that seem to Álex de la Iglesia tries to put something on their side (the long sequence that follows different characters without cutting planes, while distorted by CGI)(, it is the most remarkable), but many others who condemn it inevitably. Let's go by parts.For starters, the story than the movie planet, by very attractive enough in advance (discover the murderer through tracks and mathematical tricks), just proving basic, very simplistic, and with just a couple of mentions of the science of numbers. If were not enough, these winks are absurdly simple to solve, but despite this the characters seem to take eons to resolve them, no one would say that they are mathematical geniuses (forgive the bet of the mirrored numbers as an example).On the other hand, the script (with really sonrojantes situations) is unable to move at any time. Even at the time of the final resolution, everything is cold, distant. Nobody cares and know who is who, and even the same director seems to have more desire than anyone to finish.Nor is it saved from burning Elijah Wood, which continues with the aura of Hobbit beyond where treads, and fails to make its too credible character, always being Hurt below or the same Leonor Watling. Character of this, who quietly could have been eliminated of the Assembly, as its sole purpose is the heat staff (although also admit that had not been for her surely neither would paid for the film).Finally, stresses adversely mounting in general throughout the film. Everything happens too quickly, despite the relative tedium that follows continuously, with scenes happening in zacchia and atragantada manner. One floor of the bus because he sees his girl walking down the street, and to the tenth of a second already are fused in a fiery Kiss, despite that time before had appeared discussing. Read more: a character embarks on a plane, and with little time to move the finger, as appears the transport flying over the airport without there having been a temporary cut of medium. Almost gives the feeling that "the Assembly of the director" was originally more than two hours, and then in the production room they had been used and misused of the scissors.Thus, small flashes, "The crimes of Oxford" prevents that you can define bad, but unfortunately we can not say to be a good movie. This is simply one bland thriller more, right, but those who fall into oblivion hopelessly as just its projection. A penalty. |
3,354 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/194 | Jose Contreras | El código Da Vinci | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Said a critic that see "The Da Vinci Code" is so exciting as see your grandfather solving a Sudoku puzzle | After embracing Christianity, Constantine convened a Council at Nicaea to unite all the positions and point out heresies. One of the most important discussions was that raised the Arianism. The official position was that Christ was God, had not been created, like the rest of mortals. ARIUS, on the other hand argued that Christ was a creature. What importance can have Christ to be one thing or another? Mucha.SI Christ was human, his sacrifice has value, but not more than the many other people who have suffered. If Christ was God, and defends the Church, humiliation and torment of the cross is not an example of suffering, his sacrifice is the central point in history. This Act also, justifies the salvation. This whole issue was at stake at Nicaea, and also it is in "The Da Vinci Code".The film is the battle between a secret sect, the Priory of Sion, which has a proof that Christ was human, and the most conservative branch of the Church, Opus Dei, who fight to death to preserve orthodoxy.The story of this discussion has allowed Dan Brown to do with record sales of all time with his novel. However Ron Howard is maybe not him to go so well the accounts when you see the box office. That brings me to the difference between seeking a reader that passes the pages of an avid book for a reply and seeking a viewer intrigued by a mystery: slightly different things.The film is faithful to the book for his disgrace. It begins to pose questions and advances at the expense of more questions and turns. But the role of the protagonists is not cinematic, is rather intellectual. It is not a film characters, but enigmas. A critic said that see "The Da Vinci Code" is so exciting as see your grandfather solving a Sudoku puzzle. The film does not work if the characters do not imply to the bottom; they have to play it all. The novel, on the other hand, functioned as a puzzle as an intrigue affecting the religion, to culture, to the reader. The problem is not that chemistry between Tatou and Hanks there is no, the problem is that none of his characters live the movie. |
3,355 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3728 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Mr Magorium y su tienda mágica | 2 | 5 | muchocine | A tape to be see as a child and then is possible to have a good time. A fable with a careful aesthetic sense and a moral (and moralina, everything is said incidentally) hackneyed but effective. | Honestly it did not have the slightest intention of viewing this film but as I am a person of principles and me peak easily pick up the ball and very dutifully reported on it. With the terrible tagline of "inspired by Imaginarium" all adult Spanish Viewer will have so many prejudices that it is possible to lose a good Christmas divertimento. More in the tone of Hamleys, London, this magic Toyshop has a peculiarity is that not only the own shop is delighted and their toys come to life if not that people that they enter it just somehow changed by persistent boldness of owner of the same. This must be because having the experience of two hundred and thirty-four years to your back like the toy entrepreneur helps. The figure of Mr Magorium, Hoffman, is a delicious incentive for children, the hook for adults is their store manager Mahoney, played by Natalie Portman with certain boorishness and sosez will have to face the departure of Magorium, to assume their responsibilities and return to find the magic. In this larduo way will feature Eric, a child prodigy of nine collector of hats and asocial; and Henry, the accounting officer, or as affectionately call him "mutant" that it will also have to forget about their numbers and to see life with children's eyes again.It is obvious that we have a film you must see with as a child and in this case it is possible to have a good time. Perhaps that's the problem of Americans, where both critique and public did not understand the proposal and ensañaron with the tape off of child boring. If, for an adult falls into each and every one of the insurmountable topics suitable for all the public tapes but children enjoy, and even an adult to see the forced need to accompany his son can let his imagination fly and end up in places that never would have imagined is that we are a generation with great films of toy stores to our credit. Who not daydream with playing the Big piano? Or lock with Macaulay Culkin in the second part of Solo at home in the great toys? Perhaps if Mr Magorium would have formed part of our childhood now would be on this list as it is a fable with a careful aesthetic sense and a moral (and moralina, everything is said incidentally) hackneyed but effective. Away from other proposals more unsatisfactory as the magical nanny or A series of catastrophic misfortunes with the same wrapper but less premium Mr Magorium matter can be seen. It falls on many rookie mistakes and skips to the Bullfighter narrative logic but when one is 8 years old is not important. Only one concern. What would have happened if this tape fell into the hands of Tim Burton? |
3,356 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2098 | Rafa Ferrer | ¿Quién dice que es fácil? | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Anyway, I join all those who recommend, given that they are, roughly 1 hour and 45 min. very well invested time. | In 1988 Sabina reflected accurately "The man in the gray flannel suit", a declaration of intentions of what could well be the character of Diego Peretti, who already knew among others for the excellent "No sos vos, soy yo", with which this film shared director; on the other hand, the tape that accompanies serious moments with others of a sublime comedy, is, broadly, a new bet of Argentine cinema abroad, especially when this tape accompany the protagonists Willy Toledo and Laura Pamplona, the first known for his involvement in "The other side of the bed" (among others) and to it by 1000 appearances in television series.The film, perhaps, can become one of those small pearls of the 7th Art, slip, flat out in the collective memory, and it is that in this case, Word of mouth, helps popularize so magna and fun (that milk) film.Accompanying Peretti, we have Carolina Peleritti, as the character of Aldo antithesis, being someone else, one of these neighboring, so normal, ordinary and peaceful areas of which one, quickly, can fall in / encaprichar be.The argument, curious facilónmente, plasma at a stroke and a thousand references, and it is that we have from the bizarre obsessive Geek, that we have seen in "Virgin at 40", friend (also represented on countless tapes) pervert estupidamente, all this seasoned with a "sauce" of moments estrambóticamente comedians.I can not come to admit that he has haunted me the tape, and that since then and given my Geek-collectibles in DVD, this film will be part of my "Dvd-teca", but if you say that some strange spring has been activated within me, and the I've caught some attachment affection.Anyway, I join all those who recommend, given that they are, roughly 1 hour and 45 min. very well invested time. |
3,357 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3649 | José Antonio Bermúdez | 4 meses, 3 semanas y 2 días | 5 | 5 | muchocine | More beyond the dense subject of an illegal abortion and all that it entails, the Romanian film does not stop there (luckily). It contributes decisively Anamaria Marinca's performance. | A new emerging cinema as the Romanian is delighting that indiscreet Viewer, that seeks to discover new languages, new stories, new societies. So far a film seen only in festivals, that little by little gaining ground distribution circuit. Cristian Mungiu film is, above all things, an ode to friendship. The director is live. The story in real time, without just music, claustrophobic and spaces, occasionally with camera in hand all willing to tell us a raw story without concessions, without eyes moralist. The history of a clandestine abortion serves to make a portrait of a moment of transition, a marginal view of a post-Soviet country.Beyond of the dense subject of an illegal abortion and all that it entails, the Romanian film doesn't stop there (luckily). And, in this way, it becomes one of the best films of the year, winner of the Palme d'Or at the last edition of the Cannes Festival. It contributes decisively Anamaria Marinca's performance. A prodigy full of candor in a context so cold. His gaze is synonymous with hope. Their gestures denotes complicity. The film wouldn't exist without Marinca. His character the epicenter in a world in which everyone trying to survive. Without area. No time and decisions cannot wait. In a world on the verge of collapse have no more than running.Run in a room of a hotel in fourth. Run on dark streets without transit only. Run up to the top floor of a building in ruins. Run without escape. Run to overcome a commitment. Only friendship. The bond between the two, that way of understanding life. The umbilical cord that gives life, the only hope. Again, the look of Otilia. of Marinca. |
3,358 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/824 | Rafa Ferrer | Colegas en el bosque | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Colleagues in the forest does not have nor a couple of minutes that deserve the penalty to remember, or you encariñas with the characters, and Moreover, one passes the time and little lasting, looking forward to this end. | I am a lover of film animation, and it is that wherever I see, what's the animated film for children, it makes me want to boot the head of rennet, but, honestly, and for a time this part, this flurry of films bland, poorly, with a laughable argument but not power, with stories thousand views times, and where the buenhacer which leads (especially labour and care) a tape of animation behind, is vilified, because of an excess of little zeal when it comes to her, before, in my earliest childhood, how many films had a year of animation? Perhaps 2, maybe 3, but now, now every month, more or less planted us a couple of tapes, where, as I have already said, the originality is conspicuous by its absence, and is that "Colleagues in the forest" has no or a couple of minutes that deserve the penalty to remember, or you encariñas with the characters, and Moreover, one passes the time and little that lastslooking forward to this end.Warlords, cassettes of animation itself, but also tapes of (animation) of quality. |
3,359 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/265 | Ibán Manzano | Las colinas tienen ojos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Desert, loaded guns and so exaggerated duels as, fortunately, free wild | The children of America are, in any case, the protagonists of the hills have eyes; no longer by the family of mutants to survive in the desert, whose importance is deliberately diluted in the Aja remake; but rather on the other, the middle class, who crosses the same desert for very different reasons is that really seems to be of interest to the French filmmaker, and is that perhaps the version 2006 of the Wes Craven classic evolves for revenge cannibalism to spaghetti-western; with what this entails: desert, loaded guns and so exaggerated duels as, fortunately, free wild.AJA spits blood in a western in which the protagonists are ordinary people, like us, have built their progress on the indifference towards others; at least until that are assaulted in a claustrophobic space opened by the deformed face of horror: our fear of the (a) normal. Terror is masterfully summarized in the frame of a corpse estacada for the American flag, it defended the proud Democrats doing the tape, nodding but that Yes, not hesitate to take the retrograde Republican lead inside at the precise moment that feel that they have to make sure, whatever the case, the survival of their own; including cruelty. Well looked, perhaps not so different from those mutants. |
3,360 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/110 | Tito Chinchan | Zathura | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Adventures for the whole family, children see it and the parents are fried | Fuck that fear, imagine that you open the door and you find that you're in interplanetary space mounted in your own House and a brother to estrangularías. And with Tin Robbins's father.The film is about a family Restruct in which the father and the mother take turns to the offspring in regime "a week you and another me". A six-year-old son, another ten and a late teenager kid make up the trio of gruesome children that have to discover that the family is the most beautiful thing there is. Total, for reasons which are not the case, discovers the small a game called Zathura, which makes his house being transported into space as if it were a ship. Do adventures wait them? Can you return healthy and safe? Who knows.Buf, the idea is fine, but becomes very heavy and completely loses interest as it is advancing. It is intended as a story that has a small child, in which there is no coherence and anything goes. As fantasy, this is all very well, but as a movie you far in the argument and only look a succession of special effects without a clear link. The characters are excessively prototypical, with a divorced father who is on good terms with her ex and works until Saturday, a horrific child, another asesinable and a daughter to stamp her head against the bidet. And the very absurd and excessively moral end.In short, divertimento for the little ones. They are or for the elderly a bit heavy, with many moral burden and too many emotions without ton. |
3,361 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2298 | Antoni Messa | Corazones solitarios (Lonely Hearts) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A recommended title to extend a little more, the mythical existing on the macabre couple immortalized in the film Leonard Castle. | Lonely hearts is based on a real case happened between late 1940s and early 1950s, in the County of Nassau (EE.)(UU.). The story of a couple of crooks and murderers, Ray Fernandez and Martha Beck, who joined their forces in the art of deception to approach single women announced the search for a partner through magazines of contacts. A story which previously already had been taken to the cinema several times since, the first of them, the assassins of the honeymoon, a film considered cult which was directed in 1970 by Leonard Castle and in which the dates of the events were upgraded to carry the action at the same time in which it was filmed. The visual harshness and cold treatment that gave the couple of criminals were also the same constants of (for me) the best approach to the subject: he did Arturo Ripstein in deep crimson. In the title of the Mexican, opted to move the facts to his home country and for giving him an outstanding (though bitter and brutal) touch of black humour.The tape just released, directed by Todd Robinson, advocates focus on the police investigation before that in the thorough description of bloody acts of the criminal couple of lovers. Or, at least, in the section that shows the relationship between two police officers leading the case, where works best film. On the basis of the theoretical suicide of a lonely woman, Robinson pays a special attention to the obsessive behavior of the character played by a bright John Travolta, the agent Elmer C. Robinson, a man who, traumatized by the violent and unexpected death of his wife, will not cease in its efforts to sickly by demonstrate that, after the apparent suicide, are killer hands. A type this to not believe neither superiors nor his own partner of fatigue, James Gandolfini so great (in all aspects) as always.An attractive Salma Hayek and Jared Leto give life to the two lovers who ended up receiving the long nickname of the assassins of the lone hearts, the already mentioned Ray and Martha. And, precisely, in the choice of Salma Hayek to play the virulent Martha Beck, lies the great mistake of the tape since, as they demonstrated other past products, was a homely woman marked by an extreme obesity, exactly the opposite of what happens with the actress born in Veracruz. Outbursts of jealousy and the unit facing Ray Martinez, a woman so beautiful and sensual as the Hayek, difficult to believe, thus, some situations of high tension created between them and their victims, is I seem too forced to be credible. Yet and so, its director, with an elegant and unsuspected dryness resolves those murders which displayed on the screen.The courage to use one little girl as another of scapegoats bait of the criminal duo, is an unequivocal sign that such Todd Robinson has happened (luckily) of political correctness and the false moral Hollywood that, in recent years, attempts to keep children away from the actual extent of criminals mercilessly. A, almost strict rule, which had only have jumped to the Bullfighter people like Cronenberg, A history of violence, and Florent Emilio Siri in the magnificent prologue by Hostage. A way that compensate for the failed election of the protagonist of Frida who, incidentally, is not not bad in its correct working. To give more the pego, here should have placed that mustache looked under the nose of the Mexican writer again.Its setting in the North America of the 1940s and 1950s, the voice of the character of Gandolfini, his (almost close to the documentary) narrative sobriety and mental decay and morale of the detective Elmer C. Robinson, (although keeping distances) close to some of the titles born under the protection of film noir. His lack of pretensions, the serenity of a concise script and anything bizarre (written by the filmmaker himself and also real grandson of agent Robinson) and the simplicity of an actual production make this (and despite their mistakes), a recommended title to extend a little more, the mythical existing on the macabre couple immortalized in the film Leonard Castle. |
3,362 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2216 | Bruji | Oceans 13 | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The Ocean? s saga, as the Danny? s band, reality and fiction, has a team of white glove that works. | The Ocean? s saga, as the Danny? s band, has the ability to know dock at box office, while no one will understand, with precision, the methods used. Either by the proven technical virtuosity that demonstrates Steven Soderbergh camera in hand, by their impossible planes, impeccable montage that characterizes their tapes, savoir être Clooney, or by the stunning physical attractiveness of Brad Pitt; the truth and truth is that, in both cases, reality and fiction, we have a team of white glove that works.Bad counselor is the glorious, although come disguised as enthusiasm and preceded by justified pride. Nor, apparently, was really the pretentious assertion that, back in the 2nd century a. c., formulate Archimedes of Syracuse: "Give me a place to stand and I will move the Earth"; nor, of course, is true of Warner's belief in the 21st century, according to which, "with big stars, are good movies". This technique, - mostly used by producers in the 1960s in full decline of the system of studies already became obsolete. More, as Mankiewicz in women in Venice said, "It is not so easy to do jump the Bank in Las Vegas as lead a fantasy to Hollywood", and Steven, the traitor of independent cinema, dares with both fronts for - and custom - sing an old issue of Mecano. One in which the eleven is one; the twelve, the two; and so, the thirteen three.If from a strictly cinematic point of view you may not catalog the thirteen of "good", it is undeniable that soon are significant, such as attractive and guarantee effective synonyms to define it.Effective is, without a doubt, its irregular, changing and misleading narrative structure, at all times, to the attention of the Viewer is not telecommunications engineer, experienced dealer or casino Manager. Brilliant in the first part of the footage, get enviable skillfully combine the continuous flashbacks and intermittent vocals in off in some interlocking dialogues that overlap to the central axis of the argument. Attractive is the prodigious direction of actors that performs an expert in choral tapes that, in addition, it develops complex sequences of perfect planning which, unfortunately, go unnoticed when trying to follow the plot between shared screens. Elite is the photography, special chromatic contrast, who, until recently, he signed as Peter Andrews.Y is that, despite him anyone else, the ocean? s saga knows the classics, to major productions of the best war genre, the allocations of first line which culminated in the cinema of catastrophes, the author of recognized prestige accepting commissioned work to continue with his own filmographythe obsession with the details in the perfect robbery of Kubrick, the asphalt jungle, Huston.En this last time, we came to the point in which la flor y nata of low-life is excited when participants of a television contest win a House, at the time that adjust you the accounts to an ACE (to Al Pacino) kept the writers in the manga. Gone are the adventures of the Rat Pack, stories of van and zapatazo, to make way for some criminals cults and "glamorous" style catches a Hitchcock thief. Are you miss, however, social criticism, and the character of acid of the dialogues of the gang of eleven, perhaps because in them, something or much had to see someone named Billy Wilder. The attempt of denunciation of the precarious economic conditions for Mexican workers, which contrasts with the cash rate of American actors, fails to taste because of the ridiculous jokes that are spent at the expense of noble people.And that is, we assume, the farewell of "a few players analog in a digital world", in which Valencia is California and the Greco makes mischief; just at the very moment in which those who shook the hand of Frank Sinatra (and which not) begin to tire of "props for pure props", the VIP and the NIP, the troubled face of Clooney, Pitt handsome pose and the slot machines. In any case, we should not forget that our strong point (the ego) is always our weak point, and that "when someone is ashamed of what always has been, it loses its essence". Wise advice, although coming from the underworld. |
3,363 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3525 | Oscar Martínez | Bee movie | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It has certain effect and a corrosive acidity coups in some of their dialogues, but these small conatuses of genius naufragan in the meaningless sea of brilliance and originality which is, broadly, the Dreamworks film. | Bee movie is the new film by Dreamworks.Dirigida by Steve Hickner and Simon j. Smith, and based on a story of comedian Jerry Seinfeld, the film features the voices of Jerry Seinfeld himself and Renée Zellweger, in our country dubbed by Arturo Valls and María Adánez. the film account history of Barry B. Benson, a bee newly Graduate University found something disappointed your current occupation: making honey. One day he meets Vanessa, a florist in New York. Their relationship begins to flourish and, after discovering that humans steal honey bees then for comecrcializarla, Barry decides to sue them.It seems that, at least in this 2007, Dreamworks has been in the wake of Pixar, its direct competitor. Titles such as Shrek the third or this Bee movie have nothing to do next to this little gem of animation that has meant be Ratatouille, and even the purported largest desparpajo nor that acidity characteristic of the factory Spielberg have been able to deal with rival global product. So happened with the loose third installment of the, on the other hand, still profitable OGRE green, and little more than the same occurs with Bee movie, even though it is a somewhat more complete than its predecessor tape.Bee movie has really unforgettable moments, certain master effect blows, constant references to the world of the show and a corrosive acidity in some of their dialogues truly intelligent but, unfortunately, these small conatuses of genius naufragan in the meaningless sea of brilliance and originality which is, broadly, the film of Dreamworks.Siguiendo with maritime metaphors, could say that Bee movie will drift over your footageas if never achieved find North, with a story that changes course on several occasions without reaching fruition in no time. By the way, the dialectical spark of comedian Jerry Seinfeld makes us glimpse in lontananza something genius, timely blows of rudder which pretend to put course to land, but who are unable to avoid that the film should be into the sand in an I want to and I can not.Bee movie, as I said, seeks to both have fun effect blows and gags punctual as send a message of hope for all those who feel trapped in the world around them, noble intention (somewhat moralistic, although most of the films of animation pequen, even the focused supposedly more mature audiences), but fails to materialize at any time. Or gags with characters known as Sting or Ray Liotta, nor the humanization of an animal society (which we have already seen in other titles from Dreamworks as Antz, Chicken run or British) or acidic comments appearing intermittently in the film get rid of a desazonadora feeling that tells us that Bee movie not known at any time towards where you intend to go.As well, however, is a fun, with specific truly hilarious moments film dialogues occasionally uncouth and intelligent, but they seem to give off even a greater moralina than competitor products. In addition, the dubbing of Arturo Valls does not help much, the truth.I give it a 6 out of 10. |
3,364 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4180 | Carlos Giacomelli Puig | OSS 117: El Cairo, nido de espías | 3 | 5 | muchocine | A surprise any fan of the double zero agent should be lost, but also anyone eager to spend a bit of really nice. | Cairo is a real pressure cooker. English, French, spies and Soviets populate the city while the family of the deposed King Farouk and the sect of the Eagles of Cheops will compete for the power of the city. In the midst of all this hubbub, the French Republic decides to send the agent Hubert Bonisseur of Bath, aka OSS 117, to put a little order and step Jack investigate the mysterious death of the spy Jefferson.Toda a real mythology surrounds this gala film, that a delay of almost two years finally premieres in the Spanish charts. The character first appeared in the novels of Jean Bruce, which followed a series of film adaptations during no less than two decades were appearing in European cinemas until his disappearance probably by exhaustion of a character which could not compete against the Almighty 007.Por do so, return to the big screen of the French spy needed a changea wash of image that he would highlight in a time when action cinema is saturated as exhausted. Thus, "OSS 117." "Cairo, nest of spies" chooses to enter the ground also quite overused of parody, and becomes a scathing attack at the same time that charming homage to the James Bond Sean Connery who embodied forty-five years ago.But unlike other crude attempts, this time the proposal cannot draw attention for several reasons.First and foremost, be sensed that this great joke comes signed by a truly passionate team of the genus to which homage. Everything in it reminds to the mythical "Goldfinger" or "From Russia with love": the actor protagonist, Jean Dujardin, is a calque of James Bond, extent to be at times difficult to distinguish him from the Scottish actor: nail, literally, his grimacing as his surprising capacity for enarcar eyebrows, but it is that is surprisingly similar complexion (see the sequence of the sauna). More importantly its design and visual style. Not knowing that he made in 2006, the film could strain perfectly by one of the first in the Bond series. Photography, costumes, hairstyles, scenarios, and even movements of camera (these zooms) and levels, dress the film under a guise of mature flavor that makes remember with nostalgia times past.Another important card account the film is the humor employed away from easy jokes and thick brush, is mainly based on ignorance of the French to close to other cultures alien to yours. Because in fact, "OSS 117." is not simply a parody of 007, if not also the individual's French (and in general, West) as well as certain aspects of Eastern religions. Therefore, however much that is set in 1955, Michel Hazanavicius film no longer cutting current in your background, satirising rightly about the problems present today.Course, it is not the perfect comedy, and hold any downturn in pace can it against him (in the same way that happened, by the way, with the films of Sean Connery), but still continues to be the premiere of the week, a surprise that any fan of the double zero agent should be lost, but also anyone eager to spend a bit of really nice. |
3,365 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/681 | Elena Suárez | Ellos | 4 | 5 | muchocine | For a long time that a film of this genre did not cause me such an impression so that my body was revolviese against the seat. | For a long time that a film of this genre did not cause me such an impression so that my body was revolviese against the seat, as a child would do with his mother in search of protection. Specifically, the last time that pass as "evil" was seeing the masterpiece of Amenábar, the others. By the way, anyone be confused, although the titles are similar, the stories do not seem to anything.Fleeing from the clichés that often accompany these films and learning from the classics, the two directors (David Moreau and Xavier Palud) have a good product, emphasizing an exquisite use of the camera and the silences.Actors (Olivia Bonamy and Michael Cohën) we shall transmit a long night of anguish that shall come to pass in some appropriate scenarios where coexist of doubt, the terror and the instinct of survival. We are sure that there will be who, after seeing this movie, feel not so secure in your own home. |
3,366 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1806 | Alex Largo | Cry Wolf | 3 | 5 | muchocine | In the film, it is not a tele-film... A compliment that not you could miss to "The River King". It is rather a film you are passing in cinemas in summer at a meeting to the many of the night in the most remote room of cinema. | I saw this film with a total ignorance of the argument. After seeing, I can say that it has a simple argument. Moreover, the plot goes lurching between what already have seen thousand times and the crap that the teen horror film we are accustomed. But then we came to the end, at the second and real end of the film. then the film surprising (in fact is the only time that makes it) with a finish nobody expected (although the first see the League).In the film, it is not a tele-film. A compliment that not you could miss to "The River King". It is rather a film you are passing in cinemas in summer at a meeting to the many of the night in the most remote room of cinema. It is true, the film is nothing out of this world, but is entertaining, and is not so bad. And only the end already makes that the film worthwhile.There is no any noteworthy aspect in the movie, nothing to make her be special. Except the end already commented.Advice: If you are going to rent. do not preconceived ideas, not see with illusion or enthusiasm. Then the film will be enlightening. |
3,367 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1144 | Jose Contreras | La Caja Kovak | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Watching movies like this one does not lose hope that the Spanish film begins to take himself seriously. | The Kovak box has in common with "The silence of the lambs" the villain captures a dangerous role. Although Timothy Hutton has the privilege to save the girl, it is actually the villain, Kovak, who quite the history, is he who commands, even in the end. The villain is a bad caricaturizable, a somewhat limited bad with this desire to be a character in a book, but has a disturbing point when he himself wants to be the bad guy. Daniel Monzón has given a real tumble to Pirandello and Unamuno "fog". The character speaks with its Narrator, and does not conform to force him to write his final. Each time I like the flat virtuous sequence. The girl is in the shower and heard the fatal melody; the camera leaves the room through the window, descend to the bar without a court and follow the waiter suddenly turns so let's see how the same girl has fallen on the terrace. One feels crushed by the idea, by the images, and if you want, also by the trick of shooting such takes uncut.It's a good thriller. It is told with a clean deck, unmarked, in which the director is taking cards and more and more amazing, with an ending that is not deflated as a bluff. The outcome is characterising, tells the protagonist that he cannot be an observer. Monsoon, like so many others, has wanted to make a thriller at the height of Hollywood, and must say that at no time did the ridiculous, which is much to say. Watching movies like this one does not lose hope that the Spanish film begins to take himself seriously. |
3,368 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1429 | Alvaro Oliva | Noche en el museo | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Is the end the most child point throughout the film, but despite this?Night at the Museum? does becomes an interesting and recommended product for all those who enjoy adventures in the style of?Jumanji? | The simple idea of that at night, when all visitors are gone, the figures of a museum come to life, it is something that draws attention and that in one way or another, all us you have raised or thought about many things. This is the start of this film by Shawn Levy, (twelve in house, the Pink Panther), which has a very interesting cast and consecrated as Ben Stiller, Robin Williams, Carla Gugino, Owen Wilson, Dick Van Dike, Mickey Rooney and Bill Cobbs among others. Larry Daley, played by Stiller, is a divorced father, tired of walking work at work, and at the prospect of having to move and fail to see his son, decides to accept the post of night watchman at the Museum of natural history in New York. Once there you will know the vigilant old (Van Dike, Cobbs and the mythical Rooney) which will give you a couple of tips before leaving you "solo".After get used to the place and start to make the goose, Stiller realizes that something is not quite normal, and that all the creatures of the Museum come alive at night. From a Tyrannosaurus Rex to tiny legions of Romans, jeans and indigenous Maya, Attila and the Huns, passing by Vikings, Mammoths, Neanderthals and President Roosevelt, played by Robin Williams. Clear reminiscent of "Jumanji", although at a lower level, "Night at the Museum" is presented as an entertaining adventure for all ages, that it will be great seeing everything that happens in this Museum, and partly wishing that I had had this when we were small. Daley will need to deal with all the problems generated by the tenants of the Museum, as well as other plots and conflicts will arise, and that you will have to deal with before dawn.It is true that there are some gaps, rather loose parts of script or up inconsistencies, but no one comes or is intended to meet "The godfather", and especially the public to whom it is intended is not so demanding, abundantly and so the objectives and fields in which you have to highlight, it does. "Night at the Museum" has a few very good special effects, however has the supervisor of this Department of the trilogy of "The Lord of the rings", as well as the company "Rhythm & Hues", responsible for of "the Chronicles of Narnia: the lion, the Witch and the wardrobe".It also enhance production and art, team recreate a Museum of these dimensions is not easy task.The end is the most child throughout the film, but despite this, "Night at the Museum" becomes an interesting and recommended product for all those who enjoy adventure "Jumanji" style, at the same time that they remembered the stories and tales of his childhood and that they do not fail to enjoy this stage of their lives. |
3,369 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/497 | Beatriz Perez | Mi super ex novia | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is not a masterpiece nor is going to change lives. But it is a comedy and get what should get the comedies: making people laugh from start to finish. | Does Uma Thurman and Luke Wilson star?My super girlfriend? (?(My_super_ex-girlfriend'), a film by Ivan Reitman, one of the Kings of the eighties film comedy with titles like?Ghostbusters? or 'Meatball'. It is curiosísimo that this film premiered on our screens yesterday, exactly the same day that came out?Thanks for smoking? (?(Do Thank you for Smoking?), directed by the son of Ivan, Jason Reitman. Matt Saunders thinks that he has finally found the perfect bride, beautiful Jenny Johnson, who happens to be the superhero girl G. When Jenny proves to be too possessive and a little crazy, Matt does leave the relationship? But how to break with a woman who can fly, lift cars and make holes in the steel with its thermal vision?It was time that we could laugh with something of all this what called comedy, since this genus name is used for everything, even when products do not have even a funny moment in throughout his life. I get very heavy citing examples, but it is that they are so fresh, I can not help:?Do separate?,?The friends of the groom?, etc. With?My super girlfriend? not so. There here is very funny and very abundant points. If we evaluate with a fonómetro we could verify that the laughs are very high, especially in a particular scene. We also see that there is a very respectable amount of moments that make us laugh. But maybe we could check is that they distributed evenly until the end, because until now, comedies that could do to laugh and much during a short period of time, when they had already exploited the outrageous premise, turned in conventional films or even geeks and here the examples are not so fresh but clear:?Like God? do and others of that style or? what think women?.? This default for many movies, not only due to the sentimental message, also occurs because the writers start from an idea good, even great, but who have not can be exploited during one hour and three quarters. Rather than learn to flip that continue to make grace after exhausted, so exploit what they can and not get more ideas. In?My super girlfriend? they have been able to find humor both to the moments in which go out together, moments after cutting and even a reconciliation. The film is well shot, has a fast-paced rhythm. Reitman far exceeds the quality of his films of the 1990s, and manages to renew his style, which had only given good sample in the 1980s. There are directors, such as Ridley Scott, with those who can still smell lacquer of the 1980s in its filters and levels. Although Ivan Reitman made their major works in that decade?My super girlfriend? He has been fresh, youthful, contemporary. Yes saves then what that spirit to which I have already referred by which everything takes it a joke, which have no problem to do something fun from beginning to end. This film does not need to stop doing humor to show the ñoño message. A true romantic comedy must know combine the sentimental part with the fun, no turns: I now do jokes, now put the part of love. Predominates here comic, but love is an essential part of the plot and is not involved with shoehorn, or consists in that that makes the protagonist change in way of being and thinking for the worse. The actors are wonderful in their roles. Physically they are very appropriate and, in addition, interpreted of Vice. Luke Wilson is perhaps that stands out. We have already spoken this actor, comparing it to his brother, the un-poco - more-famous Owen. Luke, without being handsome, has a more normal face, so it can do roles of galán's comedy, which is where he always is. Fortunately, it also has a tremendous comic vis and achieved, on the one hand, to believe us that it overcomes the impressive Uma Thurman and on the other, we laugh with each of their gestures, while it conveys what he feels and what he thinks. UMA also plays a very suitable, the impressive G girl, who flies with miniskirt saving the city. The moments where you have to be scary, gives it and when it has to impose, imposes. Do do even manages to impersonate lovely girl looking for? as the friend of Luke describes? Librarian demure on the outside and ready to give a tumble on the inside. And that I speak of him, Rainn Wilson is the best in the side. Not is the brother of Luke and Owen (they have another, but is called Andrew). Her role is the friendly rogue of the protagonist, which boasts what League and encourages his colleague to also do so. Anna Faris, actress known by the?Scary Movies? It is also well in his character, is suitable and has much capacity for comedy. Wanda Sykes, who also came in?Clerks II? It has a tertiary role, but funny. And the supervillain Eddie Izzard, although it is not as good as the previous ones, is also very funny. Even dubbing is good. In any cinema in Madrid they put v. or, so I had to settle for the dubbed version, but I have to say that I not pulled from the movie. Another merit, I guess it will be a responsibility divided between the script, direction and performances, is both you be credible that Luke likes Uma as that, very shortly thereafter already find too crazy for him. Many times, when you want to a character change of opinion with respect to another, what they do is turn the second and show a lot of aspects which were not seen and that even contradict with what had appreciated until then, which is not only cheating, but it also prevents the identification. Here is achieved that it should move from fascination to rejection without problem. Even in a great film like?Do Manhattan?, Woody Allen, I find hard to believe me that he leave like Diane Keaton. Do if she enters a little inside the type of girl who represents Uma Thurman, still more clear examples would be the of?The beast of my girl?,?Yeopgijeogin geunyeo? (?(Do my Sassy Girl?)?Something wild?, etc. The theme of superheroes also needed to dust a little off their excessive importance and dealt with jokingly. ?The fantastic four? is it approached the Institute comedy, but not laughed so much of the subject like?My super girlfriend?. And also it was box thing that had to put the subject of sex in these movies. Who has not asked once what result given the superpowers in bed, especially since the Bandon Routh and Hugh Jackman, among others, performing for gifted beings? Here you can see what happens. And just after that demonstration when the best joke of the film takes place. Brilliant parody to the religious and unbearable moment of?Does did do Superman Returns? film that removing those things, I like?, it is said, that in which he is flying over the city and says that everyone ask for shouting a Savior. Here, when Uma Thurman takes Luke Wilson to fly over buildings, it hides other intentions. Also laughs a little Superman films with the issue of hidden identity. You must be blind and deaf to not realize that Clark is Superman. In?My super girlfriend? its appearance changes considerably more, but even she prevents him look at her when she rescues dressed as a superhero, as he knows that even the dumbest would realize. It is very funny about that superheroines costumes consist, not in more comfortable to fly robes or layer, but simply in sexy outfits more sexy than those who took jobs previously. If analyze well superheroes, in reality the go dressed in LaTeX is by mark, since they need nor the layers or not earn so much aerodinamismo with the leotards. But if fit, which conform. For me, there is no problem. I do not know if you know the term "Jump the shark". Applies to the moments in which the television series become delusional at all because they no longer know what else to do with their plots. At that time, you get something absurd and thereafter, the quality of the series lapses at all, so, either lost interest or it acquires a kitsch interest. For example, if in a SOAP Opera given by taking out aliens (do and this has happened, at least I remember of?)(Do the Colby?). He is called "Jump the Shark" because in the earlier series 'Happy Days' a character jumped over a shark when he was water skiing. In 'My super girlfriend' they do it literally. What better to declare openly that you are drawing a shark that nobody accused you of doing so? In the series?Does lost? (?(Lost?) also there is a moment in which "jump the shark". This joke metalinguistic alone in a scene already, hilarious, is another of the highlights of the film. If we already profound, even could be sublecturas in this film. The fear we feel people about relationships, to retaliation from the abandoned the commitment ex-amantes, etc? It could represent so magnified in this ex-girlfriend which is has powers, superoído and Super-speed. It is saying, you know exactly where you are, what you say, what do you do? and you can get in a heartbeat to where you find to destroy you. Even with this metaphor, the movie does not load to women nor comes to call them castradoras. Nor (the end of this sentence is A light SPOILER) resolved leaving the protagonist with a demure, sweet and weak girl as he sees in many film that is the perfect woman. (HERE NO LONGER THERE ARE SPOILERS) For an overview, I conclude by saying that this film is a masterpiece not going to change lives. But it is a comedy and get what should get the comedies: making people laugh from start to finish. It is often assumed to do comedy is very easy and therefore is the most reviled genus, but already say authors legendary and masters of the genre that is the hardest thing to do. And that is why it is necessary to appreciate products that have. So only with that, because it is much more advisable than those others I mentioned above. Maybe if everything that we sell as comedy they were comic things, because I would be 'My super girlfriend' and I think it is simply another more, another comedy that laugh and have a good time. But of course, after all the films that carry the label of comedy and then do not laugh even once, get one like this and it is a tremendous breath of fresh air. Is that we are, salts of euphoric cinema / or and happy. And there are times that is all what can ask you a film afternoon. If what you want is another result, tilts you for another film. But if you want to laugh, this is what to do. |
3,370 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2569 | José A. Peig | Réquiem por un sueño | 5 | 5 | muchocine | A spiral of psychic turbulence with a hypnotic effect that catches the viewer and makes it part of the bitterness. | Images. Sounds. Music. Words. Making art is to create a structure through the imagination, "double vision" of the artist, poetic visions that emerge in the interaction between the world and the intuitive eye of the creator. A Requiem is a composition, Darren Aronofsky composed with images and words to express a whirlwind of ideas and sensations, dreadful reflection on the problems of social or, better still, on the human being alienated and lost in an empty world is filling up with virtual realities of daydreaming. Dreaming of what you want, everything serves: drugs, television, sex, food, are the ways to an artificial paradise that immerses us in what we are not.The story is heartbreaking, not original, but for the perfect balance between form and substance. The parallel installation and Visual tricks configured a musicality in the succession of images that saves more than the intention of leaving "cao" to the Viewer. It is not effects, but cash. Aronofsky camera creates a penetrating vision of each psychological moment in each of the characters, using images of a sensuality sickening, using elements such as drugs and sex to emphasize the addictive drive that oppresses them. In this film, the spectacular visual artifice, bombastic psychedelia, they come to be the technique suitable for the representation of a conglomeration of individual hell articulated in an expression of collective tragedy, a drowned heartbeat that is moving towards the dream final, desperate flight forward. The death of the dream the same dream. Depending on the title, therefore, the basic idea is the lament to the underground of society, human frailty, the little that we are and how much that evil hurts us not to be more than what we are. But it is not only the pain, the gaze of Aronofsky composed various tones: pathos (represented in the character played by Ellen Burstyn, simply unforgettable), (the loss of the past with the consequent loneliness) melancholy and satire on American institutions, uses and customs. In short, an overwhelming composition encompassing both sensations such as concepts, impeccable balance between the emotional effect and the expression of an idea, a spiral of psychic turbulence with a hypnotic effect that catches the viewer and makes it part of the bitterness. Do not write more because there is no time, and also because there are no words to do it justice. |
3,371 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1928 | Francisco Bellón | La fuente de la vida | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Do is the source of life is divided into three stories, being the? real? the more powerful, interesting and best-armed of all. | Current film suffers a severe creative crisis, increasingly fewer films that could be considered original, and on the other hand abound copies or remakes remakes of earlier films. This problem is especially acute in Hollywood, although you can't know for sure if it is due to scarcity of writers with ideas or the scarcity of producers who dare to take forward different and innovative proposals.But it is also true that there are some directors are at the opposite pole, who in his desperate search for innovation and originality, spend the film limits. And Darren Aronofsky is one of them without any doubt. Try to explain what is the source of life is almost as difficult as calculated to infinity the number Pi, a task clearly comparable to the labours of Hercules. The film basically tells a story of love, loss and the search for a source that would prevent that loss. The source of life is divided into three stories, the "real" being the more powerful, interesting and best-armed of all; Here we can find the best moments of the film, some of a great Canora. The received story of the Conqueror and the Elizabeth Queen of Spain in the 16th century (great virtue show from the start which is a completely fictional vision of history) is well built, and manages to catch the viewer with the search of the myth of the fountain of eternal youth. In the third story Aronofsky is where fails completely, offering metaphysical ramblings without sense, and the theoretical poetry and beauty of this third story are totally invaluable, becoming a heavy ballast rather than a help. The truth is that the first twenty minutes, in which intermingle all three stories without ton or are left baffled up to the most enthusiastic spectator. But as the narrative becomes more linear and logical, the film greatly improves. However, when approaching the hour of truth in any history, Aronofsky will turn off the lights, and offers an ending that throws rushing past achievements.The best of the source of life, in addition to its short duration, is the magnificent work of Hugh Jackman, which continues to demonstrate his great interpretative gifts. For its part, Rachel Weisz (partner in real life of Darren Aronofsky) also does a good job with great naturalness that has always characterized him. |
3,372 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/534 | Beatriz Perez | World Trade Center | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Such is my disappointment and my bemusement after seeing last night World Trade Center, Oliver Stone, I do not know where begin to narrate the multiple reasons... | Actually, such is my disappointment and my bemusement after seeing last night World Trade Center, Oliver Stone, I do not know where begin to narrate the multiple reasons.First and foremost, for which they have not seen it yet I would recommend that you siguierais not reading this post in the first place because some may fall another spoiler (although what happens in the history is already known before) and then because if watching it without prejudice is already unbearable, I do not think as it may be with some slight negative idea in mind.I have to admit that the first half hour of World Trade Center (the same as enthusiastic in Cannes) is spectacular, reflecting the widespread confusion and lack of information and resources available to the forces of order, that they had never been able to imagine that in a city like New York happened an atrocity, and.Although it is already beginning to glimpse an apparent progressive estrangement of the facts, to focus on the characters actors, which are buried beneath the rubble of the building. And when I say seeming fall from grace, is not by chance, as the film omits such highlights as who conducted the attack, under the pretext of narration only what has happened to the policemen, but there is no shortage of television images of Bush proclaiming that no one can with them, nor other phrases featuring a marine (that comment more widely), who are embarrassed.We have buried heroes, their families, suspecting that they will not return to see them, and from here on, the film is limited to show a time to some, a time to others, just so that you do not sleep with any of the situations, so repetitive and boring, that one comes to feel guilty finished yawning to some events that were actually so terrible.I have no doubt the veracity of everything what it has Word Trade Center, but it cannot be for almost two hours to two types buried under rubble, repeating endlessly "Not you sleep" while their families go the day eating, without the slightest relevant comment, no comment on what is happening, or speculate on the situation, as if had a donkey earmuffs, which prevent them from see to its around.On top of the credibility, the victims and their wives, that as it is logical to think each other constantly, and vice versa, at the same time, share the same memories with a photography bathed in a sort of lighting whitish, worthy of the worst telefilm of a Sunday afternoon.But if there were enough with the monotony, the film includes also some shameful and ridiculous moments, even to provoke laughter in the room which taking into account the theme that I was trying to, sadly take it to the extreme of absurd parody to which leads it Oliver Stone.La first scene to forget, is when appears Jesucristo with a bottle of waterbetween colored lights, in the purest style Super Star, to make matters worse, repeated twice, if someone had not been still embarrassed. Certainly in the situation that was, the police saw Christ, and what did lack, but it was necessary to display it as well? Or better said it was necessary to display it?Apparently Yes, because what is clear as is advancing the film, it is that God is with the Americans, at all times, to manifest themselves even by a former marine, listening to your call in a church, under a huge cross (after seeing Bush on TV) and rushes to the hairdresser to shave his head, surely it is very useful for a rescue.This unfortunate character, is the hero of World Trade Center, because it is the find policemen (thanks to the warning of God), bypassing all the recommendations of the rescue teams. Do to make clear its position, in his first appearance on screen we see it proclaiming "Gentlemen, we are at war" (or something similar) and the last talking on a mobile (assume that with other marines also guided by God) to avenge the sucedido.¿Era necessary to put God in this? Because I understand that you name you for issues of faith, that is at all times already that ante despair praying most of the characters, but to talk about revenge? Find it me quite outrageous, especially taking into account that Oliver Stone has not tired of repeating that did not want position politically. Goodness! Because if it comes to position itself, would have left Bush doing the final barbecue, where all are happy, and that Nicolas Cage drops a speech on evil men, and good, that serves as a perfect icing for size nonsense.In the end credits, inter alia appears that the marine in question went to the Iraq war (which had already been quite clear), and finally the film dedicated to all victims of the offending, but at that time it is too late, because the majority of the people has left the room, after seeing a typical americanadathat did not no need that was located in the 11 September attacks.When learned me he was going to make this movie as soon, seemed not very right, because still latent footprint that remains of what happened, and if something is appreciated to Stone, is not having fallen in the morbid, nor having hurgado in the wounds with lurid images or shocking. For that we have already had the reality. But to do what he has done, nor it seems at all, which has been worthwhile. |
3,373 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2055 | Jesus Lens | Zodiac | 4 | 5 | muchocine | A story that, in a perfect exercise in cinematic wisdom, keeps you imantado to the armchair, embedded in the screen. And, then, to come out, when you mention the movie... so what has really happened in the two and a half hours of projection? Anything. | For me, what has surprised me most of "Zodiac", is that in his two and a half hours of footage, by removing the principle, absolutely nothing happens. And, taking into account that the film you hypnotizes you key the view on the screen, providing you with the five senses, there can be no better criticism.Advertising, and more taking into account that David Fincher also directed "Seven", this "Zodiac" has sold us as one movie, another one of assassins in series, it is a genre with its own entity in the USA film. But it is not that. Or Yes, but not only that.Because "Zodiac", is actually based on the crimes committed by a disturbed, on the West coast of the United States.UU., in the 1970s, but that the film is much more than the research carried out to capture him. Through his long, and yet, precise and need footage, "Zodiac" speaks of many more things than serial crimes and police investigations.It speaks to us of obsession, paranoia, the commitment and the madness. Makes us reflect on the role of the media and their responsibility to society on the success media, the desire for notoriety and the compulsive need to be (re) known.And all this without large pirotecnias with a containment of media and a rigurosismo formal as long we saw not on a screen. Cinema in its purest form in which everything is at the service of a complex, complicated and contradictory story as life itself. The music, an exceptional soundtrack that perfectly contextualizes you the history, production design, costumes, those characters who smoke as desperate and crowd of food garbage. all the details and all the elements in the service of the story, as always should be.A story that, in a perfect exercise in cinematic wisdom, keeps you imantado to the armchair, embedded in the screen. And then to come out, when you mention the film. What has happened really in the two and a half hours of projection? Anything. Or almost. There has been tension in the style of "24", there has been persecution, violent interrogations, no explosions.In the 1970s and San Francisco should not have forensic as neither medical Grissom as House. The experts calligraphers are so human that they drink, doubt and they are wrong. As well as police officers and journalists. And even own murderer.And so goes on a story that extends over more than thirty years, that comes to an end apotheosis? that no pyrotechnic - and let you open-mouthed that rarely lets you film a sediment to truth so sincere.And, of course, that hitchcockiana sequence in the obsessed artist goes to the House of a witness and, as in "Suspicion", neither he nor the viewer know what is going to bring that mysterious basement. An exercise in suspense to the surface that results from more enriching and informative.David Fincher confirms, therefore, as one of the biggest and best contemporary film directors. One of the few Directors that, today, you can trust to do feet. |
3,374 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1735 | Rafa Ferrer | Y si no, nos enfadamos | 3 | 5 | muchocine | No longer have 9 years (if more 20) and although the film is fun, is not the same, already said out there, that to where it left you not return... | I remember that when I was 8 or 9 years did works in my home, we rent just the upper floor of the House and while my parents fell to revise as the masons were with their chores to my let me locked in a room watching TV, a Sunday afternoon night in 2 issued this film, such would be laughing at the sight that my parents got running alerted by my children's laughter.Well, a day chatting with friends the vast majority had seen the tape, and remembered her with the same illusion/fun old, well, pulling Emule I got, and I returned her to see, the truth is that although I laughed quite, I no longer have 9 years (if more 20) and although the film is funIt is no longer the same, they already said out there, that to where it left you not return. |
3,375 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/14 | Ivan Sainz-Pardo | Match point | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Great Woody Allen | Is known that portrays the bourgeoisie as very few and that its regularity, associated with his prolific career as a filmmaker, rises it at the top. I have weakness by Allen, am not going to hide it. It is a counter of stories is exalted in his craft and his style visual with every one of his movies. This time is the turn of portraying the English gentry with a love story in quite conventional principle that also develops quite slowly. The director changes Jazz by the Opera House and wheel for the first time in England. Her portrays just as the can do, showing places typical, charismatic, but always without abusing and concentrated on support with the locations that the upper class environment. Johnatan Rhys Meyers embodies the young protagonist and does a good job, but sometimes come you to notice somewhat limited with these eyes all the time of falling asleep. Emily Mortimer, beautiful and successful in his role as wife of the protagonist. Scarlett Johansson leaves, as on the other hand also was expected, disarmingly sexy in her role as fatal, mysterious woman vulnerable to equal parts, closing this triangle of passion, deception and sex. On the other hand, other actors are also formidable, as Matthew Goode, in its sauce making little boy Pope.After seeing the movie, may not be very original point that this film is obviously and largely indebted of the previous "Crimes and misdemeanours", but maybe if it is compared with "The sixth sense". "Match Point" is narrated with pulse but with great parsimony. A rhythm that makes us wish that events happen once and for all. A sudden plot twist at the end, as the tape of M.Night Shyamalan, will be in charge of return to the tempo and make us vibrate. In "Match Point" also closes the history with the sports metaphor with which begins and one falls surrendered before the wisdom, the control and the hand of Allen, an intelligent writer, an orchestra conductor restless, extremely intuitive and truly loving their craft and each one of his own works.Nor hides his influences, or lack making: Dovstoievski, Bergman, Hitchcock, and much of the own Woody Allen for a very successful reflection on the fate, fate, the meaning of life, justice, morality, guilt, selfishness, love, sex and the nature of the social and professional advancement.Don't have to prove anything to anyone after their nearly three dozen films, but is appreciated and feels with each viewing, its willingness to continue being genuine and faithful and for not wanting to or allow disappoint his followers to maintain a remarkable quality in each of your appointments. Each autumn a very special gift always. Thanks Woody. |
3,376 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3018 | Ramón Balcells | Bajo las estrellas | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Dialogues are in memory, a character not only funny, also nice and human, and a few scenes so memorable as the dance in the kitchen. | While the proposal of Viscarret is not too risky, because the idea or the outline of the film are nothing compared to the imagination of patriotic Coixet, Amenábar or Almodóvar, is welcome to, this being a debut, get go branching paths until now never explored, apparently simple and very realistic. Dialogues are in memory, a character not only funny, also nice and human, and a few scenes so memorable as the dance in the kitchen. Under the stars is a title which I believe that it will happen to the history of the Spanish film, well because it is too independent (sometimes antonym of bad), or simply by telling a story that her we have heard more than once. But as I say, is the grace of the set and magnificent interpretations make, this, an exemplary debut.The beginning is somewhat typical, with the protagonist (a great Alberto San Juan) lost means that changes of aires when they tell him that his father is very serious. It is then when he travels to the town where he spent childhood and, as it is recalling, is exploring and opening in a freer world. You will also know the always wonderful Emma Suárez, which here proves that theirs is the drama. But also presence a comic air in the film, that touch that makes it simply delicious, while the surroundings where it is not precisely so charming. Also highlight the charming presence of small violet Rodríguez, a well-written paper and changes the lives of our beloved main character.And already by the way mention the correct script, which sometimes exceeds trying to address too many issues at once (for example, the story of the brother agonies spare, although in the end helps round out the main plot), but at the same time get a really successful melodramatic line. And it is not that this is a great movie, one of these masterpieces of cinema homeland such as labyrinth or Sampedro, but it is certainly a courageous proposal, something simple and very obviously creating something really charming. Under the stars is one of the most beautiful films I've seen in time, and this is appreciated. I have no more obliged to add the name of Viscarret in the list of Directors that promise. And it is that start is already much. |
3,377 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2526 | Tito Chinchan | Madagascar | 2 | 5 | muchocine | If you have small kids, lead them to it to see animals and colorful on the screen. If it is not the case, not gasteis money, unless you have a so infantiloide mind as mine. | See this film reminded me my earlier years, in which I spent summers playing risk. If things were going well, you had half the world and Madagascar gave you more or less the same, given that it was yours and no one could attack. If things went wrong, and you were lucky to have this region, you agazapabas you waiting for better times. Well, because the movie has nothing to do, but I was reminded of this nonsense.The film is about a few animals that live in a big city in a modern country. The star of the zoo is an a little bit proud Lion, that every day makes a show of ROARs and poses. His best friend is a zebra, which is neither as artist, nor wants to live where he lives. She wants to live in the wild world and have fun. Then appear a few penguins who are graciosísimos on par with bastards. A few monkeys that not is what paint but have its dotted. And a burning llorica with a hipopótama which is the unique string in the history. And then go them to things and at the end it ends well because it is a film for children. ALE.como well say, the film is for children. It's not like Shrek or the incredible. This is for children children. Do not go ugly bugs give fear, there are no scares, no complicated talks, or nothing at all. So if you like animated films for adults, nor are you happen to go. To my personally I liked. The main plot is a little roll and moralist, but the secondary plots are good. The Penguins are cachondísimos, and a little bastards. By the way, remind me of some folk, not be why. And the appearance of the lemurs is grandiose. Itself are stupid bugs, but they have a song that is very catchy. The lion and the Zebra are quite dull. The filetarías Zebra and lion you would give a kick in the crotch.In short, if you have small kids, lead them to it to see animals and colorful on the screen. If it is not the case, not gasteis money, unless you have a so infantiloide mind as mine.Besitos.P.D: That grace make me the problems of the lion because it is hungry and want to eat his best friend. And to solve it, they eat fish. That pussy have done you to the fish? They could have made the vegetarian lion and leave alone the fish. And when eaten juicy steaks at the zoo? Oh, we deceive children with tonteces. In the end.Pd2: Greet and sonreid. Greet and sonreid. |
3,378 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/510 | Plissken | El viento que agita la cebada | 4 | 5 | muchocine | Perhaps too refers to his another major work, but the intensity and the sadness that evokes the whole, beautiful photography, and inspired music make 'The wind that shakes the barley' a more than worthy winner of the Golden Palm, Cannes. | I do not care to acknowledge that Ken Loach is one of the directors that I has more excited with his films ('Ladybird, ladybird', 'Raining stones', 'land and liberty'.). Many accuse him of excessive didacticism to apply their leftist thesis in his films, others complain of manichaeans who are its characters. To me, what they want to tell you, I get a knot in my throat in most of the time. It will be political affinity (over the years, increasingly fewer) or simply identification with the characters, of humble origin and flesh and blood. The case is that with 'The wind that shakes the barley' (2006) Mr. Loach again achieve. Another llantina in the film 'The wind that shakes the barley' tells the story of two brothers, Damien (very successful Cillian Murphy) and Teddy (Padraic Delaney means…) O'Donovan, who are immersed in the struggle for the independence of Ireland in 1920. What at first is a fight against the invading English, becomes later in civil war, to divide the Irish side between those who support a peace treaty that subordinates them to United Kingdom and those who think that the Treaty should file the English king in its Augustan rectal cavity inside. Damien and Teddy will find themselves at the crossroads of cease fighting and accept the Treaty or pursuing the ideal of a Socialist Government for all Irishmen, blood and fire.Unlike 'Land and freedom', 'The wind that shakes the barley' focuses not so much on the political side but the effects war has on people. Damien, a medical student, becomes leader of a column of the IRA in the absence of his brother, having to make decisions that mark of by life. Also his brother Teddy, savagely (very wildly, one of those scenes that make a cover eyes) tortured by the English, becomes a defender of the Treaty of peace with his enemies. The families of the rebels suffer the punishments which may not inflict on the nationalists. English soldiers, after the nightmare that was the first world war, are killed by the IRA. Here, in more balanced way as 'Land and freedom', shows the objectification of all conflict, and the consequences of such objectification. On all sides.Loach also reflects on the use of violence, that is, terrorism. While in the first part of the film justifies this armed struggle by the violence and injustice of the "black and tans" English in the second part of the film shows us a few characters who, in his own words, "have crossed the line", and believe that turning back from the violence used there is not. Some other politician should see this movie to realize that the end of violence is not matter that someone tell "have stopped" and is already. But that is another debate, beyond of the film 'The wind that shakes the barley', altogether, perhaps too refers to his another major work, and perhaps the brutality of English mercenaries may seem that it is only to justify the armed struggle, but the intensity and the sadness that evokes the whole, beautiful photography (work of the great Barry Ackroyd), and inspired music (from the no less great George Fenton) make 'The wind that shakes the barley' one more that worthy winner of the Golden Palm, Cannes. 8. |
3,379 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/270 | Rafa Ferrer | El tigre y la nieve | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Stays in a brief sketch of the conflict in the Middle East where, unfortunately, and perhaps caused by a rather than abrupt mounting, everything is diluted like sugar in coffee | Benigni, is back after the hiper-premiada "life is beautiful" and the failure of its "Pinochio" in real image, tries with all his strength to certain doses of comedy, mixed with bitterness, but falls in the repetition and seems the script (in part) to his successful film, as well as the repetition of their "tics" and jokes of the other.Unfortunately Benigni, parking the freshness that had "life is beautiful" and with a very interesting topic as the conflict in the Middle East, stays in a brief note, where, unfortunately, and perhaps caused by a rather than abrupt mounting, everything is diluted like sugar in coffee.Great Jean Reno and Nicoletta Braschi, this latest film producer (you have to remember that it is the wife and Muse of director.) and a soundtrack; with a theme of Tom Waits of Fund, as in "life is beautiful" comes to tire in its repetition.In short, a film which will be remembered most as "life is 2 Bella" than by its original title. |
3,380 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/657 | Jose Contreras | La dalia negra | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I've always refused to accept the equation, universally accepted, according to which good cinema is equal to the sum of the recitals of the protagonists | I've always refused to accept the equation, universally accepted, according to which good cinema is equal to the sum of the recitals of the protagonists. Even though you want to insist, the performance of Johansson and Harnett leave nothing to be desired. Nor do I accept the excuse that they are not well-chosen. It's the narrative, it is always the narration. "The Black Dahlia" indifferent because it is poorly told.Two policemen share a deep friendship. Both are good fighters and get an unforgettable feat with a match to police. One of them is the boyfriend of Kay Lake (Johansson), the other wants, but respects his friend. One of them is obsessed with the murder of an actress in second row (the case of the Black Dahlia is a true story), the other is a mess with a millionaire.The triangle is not resolved because we do not know from where it is told, nor for who must take sides. We do not understand the dilemma of the protagonist between his heart and his loyalty to the friend. Later, Josh Harnett has to choose between the good woman and the depraved. But today no one is prepared to reject a character to have had homosexual trouble. James Ellroy homophobia is a problem of Ellroy, not ours. To surprise the Viewer, the action takes unexpected dyes and turns make us ask ourselves what we believed. The problem is that we did not expect anything, because during the first hour we have no characters with whom connect or an action clear to engage us, we have a few assumptions that can then fly into a thousand pieces. |
3,381 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/444 | Kiko de España | Manderlay | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Harder than Dogville, Von Trier shows, as it did in this, that the people we are some real shit, only that this time comes further, because they are not saved or cotton pickers. | People are fucking shit. This could be the title of the series in the head of this great son of the great whore that is Lars Von Trier. Manderlay, 2005, is the second of a trilogy which began Dogville (2003) and close von. Grace is now with pueblucho where slavery is still present and decides to intervene. Sometimes things, although we do them with good intentions, not should be fixed, the great plot twists of the film are responsible to prove it.Harder than Dogville, Von Trier shows, as it did in this, that the people we are some real shit, only that this time comes further, because they are not saved or cotton pickers. Almost all of the "present" elements remain invisible, but what dazzles at all times is a wonderful script and a few excellent interpretations on all a Bryce Dallas Howard, which I've love definitely and it is certainly the best work of Ron Howard. (Is it yours?) Well, redhead if) John Hurt is narrating the story, divided into nine parts or chapters.Strange is my relationship with the director, Dogville, Manderlay this or dancing in the darkness seem wonderful, what happens is that idiots seems to me one of the greatest offenses I have seen ever, which made me deny him until I saw "the musical" with Bjork. I greatly disgusts the intelectualoide movement who invented the smart people like him or Vinterberg and that, see you where, at the moment there is no trace. (Or in Dear Wendy is present somewhere fucking fucking oath?)I guess that when they discovered the pop music, the very asshole renounced its principles. And everyone wins. Great end credits. 9. PS: Go streak of outstanding, hopefully be kept, although I very much doubt. PD2: Despite rumors, not seen any animal killed in the movie, but if there was, there is the news. |
3,382 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2077 | Patri | El jardinero fiel | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The denunciation of the situation in Africa and how big drug companies experience their drugs with the Africans, with a suspense plot mixed with much skill. | The faithful gardener is a good film, mixed with great skill the denunciation of the situation in Africa and how big drug companies experience their drugs with the Africans, with a plot of suspense, which in principle may seem a bit convoluted, but is very well explained and the Viewer is not lost on the road. In other similar films, the plot is so liosa and full of names that no one learns anything of what has happened, however, this film is developed with clarity, despite being a complicated issue that touches at the end.During the first 40 minutes we enter in history, a great flashback in which we are told how the protagonists met and how they got to the current situation, may seem a too long preamble, but when it starts the other part of the film, all this is forgotten and you realize that it was necessary that prologue so long to know perfectly the story and not miss.Ralph Fiennes makes a good performance, his character undergoes an evolution very clear throughout the film, at the beginning is a diplomat and behaves as such, restrained and discreet, but as it is advancing the story increasingly express more emotions. Rachel Weisz is correct but not dazzling. |
3,383 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3645 | Rafa Ferrer | El club de los cinco | 5 | 5 | muchocine | An excellent classic eighties that is worth remembering. | On Friday, while playing the new Buzz of Playstation 2 (Buzz Hollywood) I found a film about one of my favorite directors, John Hudges where a reminder did a review on the most successful of his filmography, between this "Crooks at all pace" (film for which I have a strange adoration), "16 candles" and "El Club de los Cinco" another of those tapes that I have special affection.As a teenager, a summer night I found this tape, needless to say that I felt almost completely in love almost instantly Molly Ringwald, my heart and my teenage mind for quite some time, apart from the rest of the cast Emilio Estevez, Anthony Michael Hall, John Kapelos, Judd Nelson, Ally Sheedy, Paul Gleason. In addition to the main theme of the mythical film "Don't you forget about me." anthem of an entire generation of thirtysomethings between who I am.Among these 5 characters, on the other hand, it's easy to feel identified with one, the athlete, the ready but clumsy, the criminal, the Princess or the crazy idealistic, translating between them a simple group where this stuck almost the entire population. In addition to the argument, which goes from less (some boys in a school), to more during the hour and a half of footage, a tape that could perfectly represented in a theatre, go to be theatre to the more not being able to some Spanish theatrical producer have not thought about adaptation? Or even in the musical? jajajajaResumiendo: an excellent classic eighties that is worth remembering. |
3,384 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1589 | Rafa Ferrer | El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider) | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The story, unfortunately does not give much, and is quite linear. Palomitera, in the broadest sense of the word. | Umpteenth adaptation of a Marvel comic book on screen, which boasts an excellent deployment of special effects (as curious point that this film thought to occur in the 1980s, even there are some nice make-up tests by the network, but had not as advanced as the now effects).Nicolas Cage and Eva Mendes (the latter more pneumatic than ever), give life to the protagonists, Cage, as always, online, providing just enough and little else, Mendes showing her body serrano (seems sponsored by Wonderbra), on the other hand we have to Peter Fonda, and Sam Elliott, who begins to be usual in this type of film.The story, unfortunately does not give much, and is fairly linear, it is true that for those who have followed the adventures of the Ghostrider the world of the comic will be some things it family (including his alter-ego in Western), but certainly not will go down in the history of the cinema, since it is pure entertainment swallows popcorn and coca cola.The soundtrack highlights the theme "Riders in the Sky", famous for being one of the most mythical songs of Western film. The rest of the issues, as always (common in this type of film) sugarcane music.By the way why noses will not be behavior in public places a subject to study at school? Every day I like less going to the movies at times where the "pipiolos" can go to berrear with your colleagues. |
3,385 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2245 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | The messengers | 2 | 5 | muchocine | I have not ever seen a film so inevitably doomed to fill the shelves of the video shops. | I have not ever seen a film so inevitably doomed to fill the shelves of the video shops. Its eye-catching posters could cause customer recale boxed DVD and rent it. It could bring together a gang of teenagers, well crammed of potatoes in bag, soft drinks and dried fruits, that divertirían a big way with this ghost story from farm to return to the world of the living to cry revenge. It often happens. The most striking is that Sam Raimi, director brave and, apparently, already well released horror films producer, has seen something good in this infumable pastiche, that not scary and lost boldly and lack of modesty in hundreds, I said well, movies with similar ingredients. We appoint: House Bewitched, family problems and paid basements of scares. As he is about to start your shopping journey on DVD, take note the demanding reader and does not fall into the trap that I've committed. Devoted his splendid time to re-read the classics or start that novel that is without manipulating still or leave pollute the pure and inmarcesible beauty of M, the vampire of Dusseldorf. That as comes me this title? By necessity, out of sheer necessity. In any case, the range of possibilities is enormous. Life is a delight when one finds these small pleasures that engolosinan US leisure and produce these tickling in the pit of the stomach. The closest thing to love. |
3,386 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/931 | José A. Peig | Perros de paja | 5 | 5 | muchocine | Many inspirations and varied notes deserves and distills the viewing of this flawless film of Sam Peckinpah, an impressive construction of a social conflict of ideas and forms of principles against the instincts and what leads us to detach ourselves from any Convention. | "Straw dogs", shot to the convictions of enlightened consciousness and centuries of "humanizador" effort (why exclude violence of our psychological and biological background as a species if it has always shaped our humanity?), narrative earthquake in pursuit of sharp consequences in superb development of a specific atmosphere of indeterminate hatred, dehumanization in a loop of unfortunate and events sponsored by a climate of tense ambiguity. As when you presientes the hidden Wolf in the shadows and just to wait for the cluster of events to explode in a terrible truth. Urban nightmare, an unexpected hero, x-ray of violence history.Many inspirations and varied notes deserves and distills the viewing of this flawless film of Sam Peckinpah, an impressive construction of a social conflict of ideas and forms of principles against the instincts and what leads us to detach ourselves from any Convention.The idea part of something as well as a western urban, outlining a choral film in which occur within CITES different personajes-modelo: the American and his wife residing in a paragraph home, the gang of thugs, the mafia boss, the representative of the law, the victim and the verdugo innocent. It is astonishing to see as, even basing the typology of characters in very trite clichés, manages to overcome and enlarge this dimension to a range of gestures, thoughts and human emotions of enormous extent. The central character, the American WIMP played by Dustin Hoffman, strong supporter of law and rationality, this endowed with enormous complexity, complexity built with an ambigüo appear, an uncertainty in the confrontation against the adversities which progressively leads to an almost eerie metamorphosis, generated by an accumulation of acts of violence which oblige a makeshift restructuring of mental schemes. Shocking the subject is the path from the containment and initial coldness (correction in forms attitudinal and avoidance of conflict) until a final climax of authentic Madness (value and destruction, giving free rein to impulses).Significant in this regard is that the structure and the construction of the story are so millimeter precise that it gives the impression of inevitability, predestined from which at the beginning was already a potentially destructive situation (whose conclusion is outlined in a feeling after the death of a cat and the first takes of weapons to go hunting)(, a disguised but latent violence representation), and here reinforces the complexity of the central character, because it is difficult to determine to what extent their actions respond to a mere impulse according to exceptional circumstances either are the product of the repressed and ultimately released with a malevolent smile of satisfaction.In a film like this, the violence is not only staple of the action, is also a formal livelihood; Assembly used to assemble the sequence of the first frames already serves as notice with regard to what is approaching in the last stretch. And the same mounting already is starting, openly violent (a tomb, cemetery, children playing in the cemetery, a dog surrounded by children, tense and furtive glances, insinuated sex, etc). In the final stretch, this frenetic montage of faces, blood, grotesque faces, arms, transmitted what already home was latent and which likewise manifests itself in a corpus of images, flat Rapids, faces, eyes of hardness and uncertainty. The overlap that occurs between the montage of the first moments of the film (in which is hinted a potential development on later sexual and violent skirmishes) and montage in its final stretch is what gives the meaning of the same; It first outlines in power, culminating in fact. Containment is behind life and dynamism to the deployment carried out between party and party.The secondary cast, far from becoming a mere "padding", thanks to a masterful exercise in construction of characters, extends to a real and poignant humanity as life itself; see the scene of the rape, mix - happy redundancy - rape and true loving act, in which the same male instigator of the Act by a few moments, feels compassion and appreciation by and the situation of distress suffered by his companion, asking that not forced you to make use of the brutality, which will eventually give up and fold to a relationship that goes beyond a forced sexual act. And not to mention the dubious malignancy of a kept cabezilla motivated by the disappearance of his daughter.No topics, but a humanity encompassing all the x-ray of gruesome acts. Here, nor the bad guys are so bad, nor the good are so good, and why we we have a superb film in the realization, pace and Assembly, in the creation of a (rarefied) atmosphere of concern sustained from beginning to end, and in addition to all that (which is already enough), a Fund of enormous complexity, open to many readings and interpretations with regard to the law, the order, the defence of the oppressed, taking the law into their own hands, the debate about a possible use legitimate (?) of the violence.It is not a film that attempts to justify violence. It seeks neither to denounce. As it has been pointed out, the movie goes far beyond nailing their look in a scrupulous and comprehensive statement of facts (with a meticulous chain of causes and effects of a logic quite forceful, without denying that always can be discussed if the final transformation of the central character is believable or too much forced), pointing in many directions but manipulate the point of view of the spectator for none in particular what that final smile and disregard? by the unknown path?. The gaze of Peckinpah is an atonal harshness: things are simply, as they happen. Beyond everyone with his conscience. And without losing sight that is the sense of responsibility aware of the protagonist to the danger of beating of its rugged host what move you to use violence to protect him, in the name of reason and after the assassination of the sole representative of the law. Or that only an excuse?. Devastadora.para Finally, a reflection of part of a movie buff desperate: "Straw dogs" is commercial cinema, despite his intellectual maturity and the ambigüo of its ultimate meaning. It tells a story which in its more superficial lines can be understood by all types of public and keeps the suspense without ups and downs. And hence wanted to I go to stop; It is a perfect example of commercial film of high quality art, something very hard to find in the current Billboard. And from here I ask and demand the film God that punished the instigators of current conformism and banal mechanization that driving the process of creation and production of the film today, devoid of intellectual or artistic values. Tell interesting stories, but they are not more than the topic. "Straw dogs" is constructed with stereotypes, but managed with ease and multidimensionality. Is it so hard?. In our days, when one goes to the movies, has the impression that you are telling the same story with the same cliches. And I'm already sick. |
3,387 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2336 | Rafa Ferrer | Corazones solitarios (Lonely Hearts) | 3 | 5 | muchocine | curious e impressive tape of murders that are worth viewing. | With the mantra of "Based on a true story" but with many differences, have a Ribbon of the same Court (film noir) as the adaptation of the Best Seller of James Elroy "The Black Dahlia", told in Flashback and 2 parts principle (that honestly breaks the rhythm of both, a complete misadventure).Travolta plays the role of the grandfather of the director, in a manner quite unconvincing, and is that the film, dedicated to the father of this, recounts the investigation of the murders by the character played by the legendary actor of "Grease", which has already been embodied in the big screen several times.Accompanied to Travolta, James Gandolfini, away from his role as "soprano", Laura Dern, which after 14 years still see as Dr. Ellie Sattler's "Jurassic Park", Jared Letto, which still Recalling by "Requiem for a dream" (that arm agh) and his Raoul in "Panic room" of David Fincher, although I agree with all the criticisms that I read that more sensuality contributes on screen (without showing a hint of "meat") is Salma Hayek, although its similarity with the real Martha Beck is nothing short of non-EXISTENT, ah! didn't forget about the son of James Caan, the also actor Scott Caan, to which we have seen in tapes as "Into the Blue", with Paul Walker and Jessica Alba.Curioso is that this tape shows "bait" and in some moments (lime and sand, you know the curious American moralina), has a macabre corpses mixed with purinata decency, but that they were other times and that day today, females are would handle as do victims suffered on screen is also true.In end, a curious and impressive murders tape worth watch. |
3,388 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3831 | Andrés Pons | Escuela de pringaos | 1 | 5 | muchocine | Specialist Tod Philips already carried out Starsky and Hutch, trip bartkowiak, among some other returns to serve a mediocrity of any grace where development is terribly boring with moments that border the vulgarity and the non-existent narrative agility. | Some actors seem obsessed with load their careers or perhaps need urgent way turn check.Actor BILLY BOB THORNTON is has been carving one career where it shows their great skills in titles all recommended as a simple plan or MONSTER BALL among many others. Suddenly almost consecutively chains two comedietas far below his talent in question of balls and the current school of pringá you where accompanies JHON HEADER an actor aiming NAPOLEON DINAMITE ways although I think to stay pigeonholed in comedies of little nature.Specialist TOD PHILLIPS already carried out STARSKI and HUTH, bartkowiak trip between any other returns to serve a mediocrity of any grace where development is terribly boring with moments that border the vulgarity with zero narrative agility.Some really unfortunate interpreters attached to a terrible script leave this film at the height of the worst of the year. |
3,389 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/814 | Matías Cobo | The Queen | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The film is, above all, an acute reflection on a basic attribute for those who wield power: popularity. | A large number of titles of 'tv-movies' desktop, of dubious quality and repetitive invoice, usually attend the "based on true facts". For certain kinds of audiences, this is an incentive to sit on the couch during the nearly three hours that you can extend the viewing of the film, along with their respective advertising breaks. For others, myself included, it tends to be a mitigating circumstance to the tape that uses such claim. The magnificent film by Stephen Frears does not require the tagline of yore by the obvious that would be it. The Queen focuses its story in the days of May 1997 mediated between the first electoral victorial of Tony Blair and Lady Di died in a car accident in Paris. Interesting thing about its history is the dissection of how you lived those directly affected by the events of those days of questioning the monarchy and acclamation of the newcomer to Downing Street. So the film is, above all, an acute reflection on a basic attribute for those who wield power: popularity. A whimsical quality that not always smiles to those concerned with the record that they like and that leaves them suddenly and without prior explanation, with the same ease that one day arrived them.A third key character in the film, Lady Di is not interpreted by any actor: his presence is recreated through the enormous amount of available file images from it (something similar to what's done by Clooney in good night, and good luck with Senator McCarthy). Its long shadow will be agigantada by the mitómanas properties of his early death unfortunately for the Royal family. Queen Elizabeth II will live with displeasure the unanimous acclamation taxed his people someone to who she no longer considered as part of his family. Charles, Prince of Wales and ex-husband of Diana, is portrayed as a fragile man, afraid and unable to stand up to his mother. In view of the acclaim that the British fired his ex-wife, Carlos ventajista medrará so that their family report to all the possible honors a woman whom he tricked and whom he had divorced six months before his death. To make reason her mother will go to Blair, who will try to convenver the monarch of the convenience to dismiss Diana with the honors of "the Princess of the people" (adjective coined by Blair in his posthumous speech at the request of one of his aides earned him applause from the press).It goes without saying that a tape of these features, the importance of the interpretations is key and goes beyond the mere physical asemejación. The work of Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II is so exemplary that it could well be in a master class for students of interpretation. Because the dificutad to face a living character of much relevance, is added the stumbling block that this is an educated woman to millimeter dosed the display of feelings. So his performance achieved through subtle details, denote the State of mind of the monarch and, at the same time, the eagerness of this autocontrolarse and avoid that they arise those feelings that has autoprohibido show in public. In addition, the rest of the cast the clothes with great solvency London actress: from a model Michael Sheen as Tony Blair, until an effective James Cromwell as Prince Philip or a scathing Sylvia Syms in her role as Queen Mother.But it would be unfair if not also valorase the excellent screenplay Peter Morgan, witty and subtle in darts that launches a few and other characters. Because the easy would have been playing for work and have drawn up a profile osco and grumpy an envious of the fame of Diana Isabella II, and not try to make a weighted assessment, as in the film, from the points of view of other characters involved in the hehcos. Morgan succeeds and the director of Les Liaisons dangereuses moves like a fish in water in this portrait of alcove of nobles and rulers. |
3,390 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3 | Torbe | Stars Wars III La venganza de los Sith | 3 | 5 | muchocine | The sits and giving vader | The other day I went to see "the sioux" as I said my friend. The six movies trilogy comes to an end, and I will not go into considerations if it is good or bad, suda me, 2 hours and average of movie with good moments, and other soporíferos moments, and therefore cannot be said to be good, because endure these memos two his speeches in the nidito of love is a tochazo, and who get political another roll. But the war stories and some things are cool.The most outstanding of all is the mental shortage of the colaluca of Anakin, appearing in all the previous films as a ready guy, and here we see as it is bundled by Palpatine with burda chantajeadora, and is talk like a fool. Is anaquino sees (comes from Ana and quino, joaquin) has a dream and Palpatino tells that if you pass to the dark side (before is wrote with a B before the S) find remedy.Come on, I'm going to now go on the street to ask the good aunts see to see if they have dreamed of something bad and tell you that I have the solution to your dreams if they let me get them the tip. Already should be tolai to fall in a game so, because Anaquino falls as a Blackbird transalpinoBueno, and by that not talking about Palpatino, the evil emperor maloso? Often liante this made the old. not you have noticed that all this stuff there with the strangely reminiscent Mr Bush and his action in Iraq?That stating that you killing everyone will bring peace, that which is not with the, it is their enemy, and entangled people thing bad, even becoming with the power of his army of clones. Come on, I take my hat off to such Web mounted taking as an example what did Mr Bush in Irak.LOS JEDAISHarta grace makes me thing say JEDAI and not JEDI, as life has said. Return of the Jedi was said when we were children, and if someone said "the return of the jedai" was given two toñas by marica. 'Ve already talked previously about these beings that eat or fuck (someone has been fucking a jedi? and eat something?)I wonder, that pussy is habra inspired Daffy to do one thing well. Also gives equally whatever, a jedi can be a good aunt with big blue tits, or a guy fuck ugly esmirriao, or Yoda, which is a pepper green of Tudela with bastonLos Jedi are anything, until Jabba the hut could be jedi if I hurry, jajaDAR VADERMe catches attention changes give vader's hairstyle of a movie to another. If in the episode two seems a niño bien, aplicadito with his full of lacquer hairstyle, now we get done a few foxes, leif Garret crazy plan lost.Short hair to long hair, you know, long hair is synonym of bad guys. From there that said: "the Manes, the terror of the girls". Making a brief introspection about the character of Dart vader, dire that suit, inspired by the ancient samurai (especially the helmet) and all the stuff that are mounted with the espadita is calcada to roll with your katana Samurai (nothing to do with the child of the katana, by God!).The lightsaber laser are katanas, and it is not a sword, it is a samurai katanon.I miss what war stories as the beginning of the movie, which is the cock in vinegar (cock in vinegar). To see if they do more things of those, what bores me because they are the struggles of sables lasers, because you don't see a posh and it's always the same story: when the director wants to give, if not, it does not give even one.Do example: when this obiwan surrounded by thousand and his mother doesn't give even one, instead, when the clones rebel against the Jedi, saw that even two killed you one, but not had the Jedi a sixth sense that smell the danger?This movie has more holes in the script a cheese Gruyère (), but entertains, except for talks between anakino and pamela, often suckling pig, the Virgin, but it is all false that a wooden euro. Well, and now this, does not give for more this movie to suck out there, or better, that they suck us out there |
3,391 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1811 | Rafa Ferrer | Happy feet | 4 | 5 | muchocine | The secret life of the Emperor Penguin. Let you carry by the history, even if the end is a bit incredible makes dent in our corazoncitos... | Since childhood I felt a kind of special fascination towards penguins, don't know how to explain it, I always have them seen as friendly animals, elegant and simple that I fell in love since my earliest childhood, it is easy at home have more than one dozen penguins of all sizes and colors, as well as the most diverse materials, the reason why I did not see the film before her don't know, but events were postponing my viewing, so far, taking advantage of its release on DVD I have done.The tape, a prodigy of the 3D animation that gives a look almost real animals, received the Oscar for best animated film at the gala this year, stands out in its soundtrack songs sung by the actors that voice will put in V.O. from Brittany Murphy (making it really well), Elijah WoodRobin Williams, Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman, to the latter already her we hear singing in "Moulin Rouge" Baz Luhrmann, a tape that excites me.Polar, almost realistic landscapes (attention to the scene of the penguins walking through the Blizzard), and a fairly pronounced ecological language, and that, my dear readers, the man is the largest predator on Earth and as the workhorse of Attila, where we put the foot never regrow grass.With an excellent voice, despite the presence in different characters of the insufferable Carlos Latre, have a tape that will dazzle us in every way and is that the creation of all media (both water, as snow, ice, etc.) is more achieved, and apologize for repeating myself.If you attract the musical focuses you in the musical numbers from the film as well as its colorful choreographies, calcadas for the film of real actors, but you like, let you carry by the history, even if the end is a bit incredible makes dent in our corazoncitos. |
3,392 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2317 | Francisco Bellón | Crónicas | 3 | 5 | muchocine | Chronicles is a film that shows the darker side of the human soul in all its aspects at the same time posed hard topics in a stark manner, and that certainly will reflect anyone you see. | There are movies that it seems that they premiere at the most opportune moment possible by the political or social situation affecting a country. In the majority of cases, it's pure coincidence, and in others, it is tape that soon no one had paid attention and timely reach the screens at the ideal time. Chronicles is one of those films that encompass the second group, when it comes to Spanish screens with more than three years late.Denying that the current society lives mediated and that it depends in good part of the influences of television would be crazy. It would also deny the sordid and morbid sells, ethics gone part of the journalistic profession, and if he is not enough to turn on the idiot box at any time. Chronicles deals with very complex and sensitive, issues mostly related to the world of celebrity and entertainment. On the one hand, the film depicts the horrors being committed in countries of Latin America, impotence and police passivity before such cruelty, and the null (not sensationalist) newsworthy that cause these facts in the first world. On the other hand, chronicles denounced the attitude of the media, and raises the viewer questions where there to mark the boundary between the necessary informative rigour and morbid sensationalism and personal ambition. To achieve a greater impact on the Viewer, Sebastián Cordero offers a hard belt, sometimes excessively uneasy, that does not give or a second of respite. There are really stark scenes, such as the lynching initial, capable of putting the hair tip anyone. The work of actors is good as a whole, although it highlights an ambiguous and disturbing Damián Alcázar. Chronicles is a film that shows the darker side of the human soul in all its aspects at the same time posed hard topics in a stark manner, and that certainly will reflect anyone you see. |
3,393 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/799 | Uruloki | El ilusionista | 4 | 5 | muchocine | It manages to be entretenidísima and surprising. If anyone had doubts that go to see her, you will enjoy. | Yesterday afternoon we are encouraged to see the illusionist (2006), film directed by Neil Burger and based on a short Steven Millhauser, an American writer winning story of a Pulitzer Prize to the best work of fiction in 1997 and whose work often reflects these temporary phases where the evolution of a system marks a turning point in history. The work "Eisenheim the Illusionist" offers this detail showing us the change of the ancient magicians full of paraphernalia to the current, a world where mechanics is of vital importance in order to create the most incredible tricks and where the little theater, in mode actor that embauca, and minimalism make the illusion still much more amazing. Starring an underutilized Edward Norton, mira which is good actor and not noted for great films for starring roles, a growing Paul Giamatti, Rufus Sewell and the very interesting Jessica Biel, puts US in the Austria at the end of the 19th century. Eisenheim (Norton) is a young magician who, after falling in love Sofia (Biel), a young woman of a status well above its potential, disappears for many years to return, and using his tricks of magician, free girl with their social obligations with the Leopold Austria Prince (Sewell) regardless of the consequences that this will entail for theShe and the future of the country.The film has no pretensions and therefore manages to surprise and provide a result far superior to many of the films that have been seen in recent weeks. both De Palma and Scorsese so much so that in the end the adaptation of a short fiction story be the very best that you can see by the cinemas. With a curious picture of old film with true gradient on the edge, a fairly currado script, a musical composition by Philip Glass, the sea of interesting and a sincere atmosphere, achieved that it is entretenidísima and surprising. If anyone had doubts that go to see her, you will enjoy. |
3,394 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3523 | Ana Belén Pacheco | Leones por Corderos | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Omen you that your poster could never predict long Cruise, Streep much, much Redford, but a short career in the Spanish cinemas. | Lions for Lambs is one of those disappointments that are seen to come from afar. Maybe the irregularity of Tom Cruise when choosing roles and political diatribes of Redfort that lately it is not quite right and when he gets behind the camera is petulant and doctrinal to be tedious and sleepy.Several things not just materialize on the tape. The first is the error structure segments to address the political pamphlet: a Professor trying to take their students on the right track, some soldiers in full military operation and a Senator trying to sell the success of a military political strategy to the press. It does not fit. It is well orchestrated but has a Hollywood tufo remaining sensationalism to the proposal which is far from being a plausible. Now it is fashionable to say that war is evil. There are many ways to do so, in this film not have risked and have done so from all points of view, you see the war, you speak of the war and even justify you the war but in the end the European viewer not biting the hook of a bet rather mediocre when compared with the rest of the doctrinal anti-war films of the you recently.In fact, with this premise I omen you that its poster could never predict long Cruise, Streep much, much Redford, but a short career in theaters Spanish political cinema.? No, desktop cinema. |
3,395 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/965 | Manel Juanico | The rocky horror picture show | 5 | 5 | muchocine | I present?Do The Rocky Horror Picture Show?, what you leeréis then will change your lives? or rather cross-dressing them? you do not dream, live it! | When this blog was born, will be the film that really inspired me something more than one year now has done was "The Rocky Horror Picture Show". It is certainly my movie favorite inside of what I call "Other cinema", these cult films, different from the rest with a legion of fans who worship them for being what they are, be special, some fans that feel bugs rare to see this type of cinema but they feel proud of it. The film of which I speak today is the summum of this type of film, the epitome of what we might call cult film, his followers would kill for her, his love for the film is such that gather to see rooms upgraded, full of balloons, toilet paper, gloves rubber, confetti and transvestism. Watch this movie is a joy for the six senses, if I say six because with the five not enough to taste this wonder. I present "The Rocky Horror Picture Show", all that leeréis below will change your lives? or rather cross-dressing them? you do not dream, live it!Well, in principle give for granted that those who read this do not know much about the movie, if you're an expert in it I do not think that you find much new information, anyway you would encourage to continue reading and I encourage you to leave here a comment that contributes more than I can say, I'd like that this post reflect everything about this film. If instead you've never heard talk about this film, or sounds, but you have not seen, then I must say that you have to continue reading, do it by me, by the "other" film and this blog. Made this sort of introduction, something more long than usual (as required by the subject), then move on to item. We find ourselves in 1973, a musical is reaping success in the theatre "Royal Cort" in London. This work was what would be in the future "The Rocky Horror Picture Show", written by Richard O´Brien and directed by Jim Sharman. It is gradually becoming a cult work, i.e. viewers are going to see the work more than once, know the songs and part of it. A few months later it opens in California and is also very successful, which encourages producers Michael White and Lou Adler to propose to take her to the cinema. I would like to talk more about this work but the truth is I am not sufficiently informed to treat the theme, the argument, as the film was about two students nerds left in a world of decadence, rock´n roll, sex and science fiction. In a documentary that comes as an extra in the dvd released in Spain are some anecdotes of the work. I remember one that is when Meat Loaf attends the theatre to rehearse for the first time and meets with Tim Curry, who plays Dr. Frank b. FURTER, which later will talk further, dress with stockings and a leather suit. Meat Loaf has no idea that is going to work and leaves the theatre, saying that he does not want to participate in something so. Luckily at the end so convinced and later played a great role den film. For more stories similar I recommend you see this documentary and interviews that come on the dvd, there are really weird things, some them comment on here, but it is impossible to say it all. Let us focus then in what is "The Rocky Horror Picture Show", the film. We are going has make a kind of synopsis, without disclosing much but not hide anything. Brad and Janet are a couple of very simple, she very prudish and he quite seriously. After attending the wedding of a friend Brad asks marriage to Janet. His return is lost with the car and go to a strange mansion where is this holding a strange Convention. There get them Riff Raff a mysterious Butler and Magenta a maid of more eccentric. Invite them pass and they are in a room where there is a kind of party, everyone goes in disguise with strange costumes, hats of colors, glitter, facemasks, to Arab costumes. They begin to sing a song and dance. Frank will appear ´n Furter, the owner of the mansion dressed in leather and fishnet stockings, is presented to the guests and invites you to attend the presentation of their "work" is not more nor less than a sort of "Frankenstein" blond and with many muscles that he has created for your personal enjoyment. From here the in adventures that Brad and Janet will be living in the mansion they discover their sexuality hidden until then. MMM, missing much argument in this synopsis, more than all that there. We have other characters, Dr Scott, Eddie, Columbia? It is now when have to dig a little deeper. Here I will reveal some things it is better to not know before seeing the film, although for me the most important thing is not the argument itself, but everything else, the music, the choreography, the aesthetics. Visually it is really shocking and musically even more, so gaps that may exist of script are totally needs. So let's first of all, the "nerd" wedding, what nerd? As wikipedia defines as "traditionally is a very intelligent person, fascinated by knowledge, particularly scientific, characterized as a lonely person socially and socially awkward." Today, the term refers equally socially normal one, which presents a great knowledge of a topic not dominated by the common people. Many features attributed to a certain type of nerd usually go also United with Asperger syndrome, a form of mild autism, sometimes confused with sense of humor, and vice versa. ". So we have two nerds who attend the wedding of a fellow nerd University. We are in the city of Dentex, a curious Church, created expressly for the occasion, I understand only built the front for the making of the film, the interiors were filmed elsewhere. At the end of the wedding the bride throws the bouquet that will stop to Janet. Janet is performed by a young Susan Sarandon in one of his first performances for the big screen, and if I have not misunderstood, the only one in which he sings. In principle this role came to him by chance as he attended the casting only to greet Tim Curry, who was his friend. He was told to sing, but she said that she didn't know, his father was apparently a singer, but she not dared even to sing along. Still lost the shame and sang and went it so well that she got the role. The Janet character was defined by herself as "the fever of Saturday night of the naive version". Already presented all the characters and having an idea quite clear where we would have to conclude this species of monographic section of the film, but before I would like to provide a few more data, curiosities, or facts that occurred during filming. His voice is funny, very acute, which you've heard some of his songs in the movie you know what I mean, also you can listen to it for example in the video that I put below. Well, going by the of the bouquet, which I don't want to lose me as much information. It is then when Brad, played by Barry Bostwick, this already more experienced in musicals and well-known for his more than 50 characters played in television series, today in day proposes to Janet to her giving him a ring. Both this and Susan Sarandon had not participated in the play and with Meat Loaf form the American trio of production. Then begins the first musical number and is when some of the characters who will later come in the mansion. At this time already we see that it is not for nothing in a conventional musical, both the music and the choreography are totally different to that seen until then in musical type "Grease" or "West Side Story", although it may have some similar more with "Saturday night fever". Here's that first number musicalEn the scene later found the couple in a car, in the middle of a storm, listening on the radio to the resignation of Richard Nixon, something that is not at all random and places us in a time of transition deliberately. Many things are going to change? in the life of Brad and Janet. The car breaks down, and under the storm they envision the mansion and they sing a song that my particularly I love, especially when it appears out of the window the character of Riff Raff. Here is when did not find the mansion, one of the points most forts of the film and that it is of great importance in the aesthetic outcome. It's a mansion in ruins found the Interior Designer Brian Thomson and the artistic director Terry Ackland on the outskirts of London. The mansion was used on several occasions to shoot horror films. They did a great job adding modern elements such as an elevator, which was not really such, but a hydraulic system which gave the pego. All the decorative elements were carefully selected by the art team. You can see the video of this first contact with the mansion here. It is now when the door opens Riff Raff, the character played by Richard O´Brien, composer of the musical and true architect of this wonder. Curiously this was the first musical writing, and that is noted especially in the freshness and originality both lyrics and choreography. Richard O ´Brien has been very versatile during his career, being singer, songwriter, playwright and actor among other things. When Jim Sharman suggested him to write the music for the theatre wasn't it twice, so he wrote a damning, groundbreaking, controversial and of course fun. Rex, David Bowie, Sweet or Roxy Music, which certainly inspired quite Richard O´Brien in the creation of the work. Glam rock had a short duration, and while few have been groups that have gone down in history within that genre, was given much to talk about at the time by the daring of its costumes and staging. Remember, groups such as the New York Dolls, for example, one of my favorite bands. And here is when it really starts the fun, but first I want to submit another character from the film, Magenta, played by Patricia Quinn, who embodies a kind of Maid of the House. This actress has participated in another film that I love "The meaning of life" of the Python monthly. When he was offered the role he accepted because he was told that he would sing the song of the principle "Science Fiction" one of the best of the film, look at the letter that has no waste, a homage to the film series science fiction 1950s B. Because it is at the end he did not sing the song and has only four lines in the film, which says when Brad and Janet enter for the first time in the House. Patricia Quinn finally was satisfied that Jim Sharman suggested him to record his lips singing the song in a sequence that will go down in history and is one of the best known of "The Rocky Horror Picture Show", the introduction of what will be this huge reto-musical. The video is required viewing and what you can see below. As said before here it is when the fun begins, Brad and Janet are invited to go to a room where a strange Convention, are about the words, the choreography of the dance is superb, we studied every movement to the millimetre so stay perfect, I I never tire of seeing it, look at the characters in as moving at levelsthe colors, the props in general, is simply masterful, only to see him happy day, seriously, but you think try yourselves. (of course that the same is not see him here in small to see it in a film, I would pay whatever to see in the cinema, or a team home cinema sound to the fullest). And now is when he makes an appearance for the first time Frank´n Furter, this kind of Dr Frankenstein regalia that leaves no one indifferent. Brilliantly played by Tim Curry, it's one of the most endearing characters has given the world of celluloid. Tim Curry machismo cost him find the tone of voice to play Dr Frank´n Furter, it is said that until that not putting the socks could not catch the appropriate tone. Either way it was a brilliant role and his voice is impressive, both moved items and those who must express feeling. And what is this festival which is organized in a strange mansion, full of colorful characters?. Then to attend the birth of Rocky, the work of Frank´N Furter, who represents the sexual ideal, a blond boy, with a perfect body, a kind of modern Frankenstein intended to satisfy the carnal desires of the doctor. The art Department's work was very important in the birth of Rocky, Rocky is born within a kind of coffin with a liquid, the idea was being all colors of the Rainbow that was achieved when the doctor drops a kind of paints in tubes. The order was strictly decided by Ferry Ackland, artistic director who told Tim Curry which should whet to give this tonality. Birth of the creature, wrapped like a mummy, they sound these two songs. At the end of the second appears Meat Loaf, playing Eddie, nephew of Dr Even Scott who is brutally murdered by Frank. As a curiosity to say that Richard O´Brien wanted to eliminate that song because he said that it was impossible to sing it because it had too much lyrics and nobody could sing so fast. Meat Loaf did and I am perfect. The entry with the bike scene was extremely rugged, a member of the team broke a leg, which towards specialist dropped the bike over, Meat Loaf also fell with the bike, broke a camera, a disaster. Good luck in the end was so good. Say the videos that I do not have subtitles, not I could find them and I did not get to upload the videos to youtube having them there, I put these videos just so you see aesthetics and music, is essential to see the movie whole subtitled to fully enjoy it. I am missing three characters by presenting and I'll quickly in this paragraph. On the one hand have to Columbia, performed by Nell Campbell, who has an interesting tap dance dance in the opening scene. You will then have an important role during the development of the film. On the other hand this Dr Everett V. Scott, former Professor of Brad and Janet, which will prove to be a researcher of the Government that is dedicated to investigate aliens. Its role is really important, is the uncle of Eddie goes to the mansion to investigate her disappearance and the corpse is found in a scene which was very curious. In this scene they are dining almost all the characters in the film, a very special dinner in serving the meat of the corpse of Eddie. Well, as it turns out that in this sequence, at the table where they eat, below is the body of Eddie's own. The director they said nothing to the actors and when Frank takes the tablecloth is his mutilated body. The expressions of the faces of the actors are real and the scene stayed very well. The last character I want to make is that of the Narrator. "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" is narrated by Charles Gray and perhaps is what I least like the film, it seems to me that although this is a very personal opinion breaks the rhythm, a little. Who tells the story, it seems a serious character although he sometimes gets to dance as the characters. It is curious and sometimes even fun, but I am saying that I do not I just like. Already presented all the characters and having an idea quite clear where we would have to conclude this species of monographic section of the film, but before I would like to provide a few more data, curiosities, or facts that occurred during filming. E.g. Frank´n Furter character, apart from having clear references to Dr Frankenstein, according to director were based also on Ivan the terrible, snow white and Cruella Vill? There is nothing. More things, because in the studio shot where they had no heating, no toilets, the conditions were very bad. To complain of this Susan Sarandon who had to go in underwear throughout the film she was told "these American stars always complaining". Susan Sarandon caught pneumonia therefore their complaints were not unfounded. The problem was that they had to spend many hours of shooting that the makeup required long. Finally say that the film was a commercial failure, people were scandalized and left divisions, projections lasted very little and not even raised it had cost. The success he has come later, released in small cinemas where projected different films, such as "The night of the living dead" or projected in universities, was gradually forming a kind of cult film that has come down to today. Each year are festivals throughout the world paying homage the film to my I'd love to be able to attend one day one. Here I leave a video of one made in Madrid. Here is the blog of this representation. Well, I know that I have leaving the film halfway, missing tell many things that occur in the second part, but is not plan to tell absolutely everything, so if someone has not seen it probably has more to do it. Say that "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" was a continuation in 1981 "Shock Treatment", directed by Jim Sharman and many members of the reaparto of the above. The truth is that I have not seen that movie, by the images that I have seen on the internet does not seem to have all the quality of the first part, although the soundtrack I still enjoying it very much. I hope that this special has been to your liking and this time that I let some comments, I like you aportarais things that I have not said, or fixing bugs in my review, I have taken much time gathering information and can some thing her has been badly. Anyway almost all the commentary stems from my personal experience with this film, I've seen so many times that I no longer remember. |
3,396 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/691 | Ana | El diablo viste de Prada | 3 | 5 | muchocine | It is not a deep examination of conscience, but it is a valid reflection on the commitment that we make between life and career. | While fast walking in heels, is film avoids falling into easy clichés. It is not a deep examination of conscience, but it is a valid reflection on the commitment that we make between life and career. It forces us to look in a mirror, or at least a reflection of some dark glasses very fashion.Meryl Streep in the role of ruthless head manages to be subtle. Without ceasing to be, literally, the bad movie. What makes the character of Miranda Prietsley is as real as several heads I've had in my life. It is rumored that the character is based on Anna Wintour with whom the author of the novel, Lauren Weisberger, worked at Vogue magazine. Seems that Weisberger I can get good advantage of the opportunity.A smart girl gets a job far below it with which it barely earn enough to pay the rent. But takes it work to make things right, and learn how things are going. It ends does not fit with corporate slavery. They constantly repeat that other girls would kill for the opportunity. The opportunity to travel to Paris. But that's only because these girls still do not know that a thing is "go to Paris and see Paris" and another thing is to travel to Paris for work.I am not a snob of the film, obviously. Even so, buy is the Scorsese Film, it would be as compare to Helen Fielding with Dostoevsky. If you opt for Bridget Jones Needless to say that it is not Russian literature. Even so I had more novels like that and more movies like this. Because a fun movie is not easy. Which I have seen recently [Prime (shared secrets), The Family Stone (the jewel of the family) and Failure to Launch] were jerks. In contrast with the devil I I enjoyed a lot. The difference is in the attention to detail, or in this case to the accessories. |
3,397 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/808 | Daniel Galindo | Dead or alive | 2 | 5 | muchocine | Another more, another video that comes and crashes into the screen. Those responsible for this production are at least aware that are playing in a lower League. | Not noted by adolescent which is destined, consumption but by the homage to all those tapes that have its own entity and here leave remnants, Matrix and Tiger and dragon head.In the tradition of the adaptations of adventure games, this title is far away even those that have all the lose in the oblivion of time, as the irregular Alone in the dark and Silent Hill. With an argument that to be in front of the computer is more than enough, on their way to the cinema not offers some consistency. He has more than 30 movies behind him, only a previous shot outside Hong Kong (Transporter) and by what they have seen thanks to this, all dispensable. Corey Yuen is the director of an orchestra where instruments desafinan and the musicians laugh at themselves. The sense of humor that doesn't lack in this parody with bikinis, girls and much muscle that at times seems a vulgar copy of the House of flying daggers and Los Angeles of Charlie, forgiveness, wanted to say tribute.Bland and without any sense, DOA (thus, in confidence) shows that its leaders lack imagination but enjoy of a wonderful mechanism to make bearable infumable footage. It seems impossible that the history is not boring, but another thing is to have the little things positive to highlight, few truth: the argument calls for a flexible mounting to print pace to the action scenes. Do do the only thing that attracts our attention, both runnig pace in the end positions us to an unbalanced conglomerate of? peleítas? and struggles, shot with unwillingness to constituted the bulk of the script. A script, by the way, full of jokes facilones, sexist clichés and a mild attempt to turn the woman protagonist and not for its beauty or their wonder in the field of martial arts. You don't have the slightest interest. |
3,398 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2667 | Emilio Calvo de Mora | Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer | 2 | 5 | muchocine | The fantastic four and Silver Surfer is the perfect film for the summer. Without another claim that entertain. No other address than the obvious. | The narrative solvency of movies Marvel not adheres to century canons nor considered among its virtues fundancionales the please large segments of the audience. Their aesthetic concerns nor require the more ponderous (and perhaps leaden seal) intervention of a film buff gourmet to understand the message, put by case. Here there is no message or grilling cinéfago concerns. The high segment of the audience, already talludito staff, may refrain: won't get lost absolutely nothing. Singer, Raimi and Nolan have set the standard Marvel at high altitude, but there is still a well nourished payroll filmmakers unpretentious (Story) that only comply with the order and billed a spectacular product - is not difficult in the times in which we live – and simple consumption.The fantastic four and Silver Surfer is the perfect film for the summer. It's bringing together a gang of kids and give them a generous helping of superheroes and sidereal call. Looked at this way, the film is exemplary: not lost in ramblings on the loneliness of the hero, not enfanga his amenísimo speech with reflections on the goodness of the human being. The plot is shipped in a plisplás: nothing needless and nothing is lacking, as in a good film of Frank Capra. Honest and direct, therefore.The emotional and psychological contrasts of other Heroes (Spider-man, Batman, X-men) are here omitted deliberately from the libretto. Do not have to bear the statutory introduction: we know who each one and how is spent. So the plot starts more or less quickly and we enjoy (Yes) with a predictable, infantiloide and majestic avalanche of special effects. I don't think that anyone with some fingers in front look in this summer device aimed at something more oblivion. If the intervention of Stela Plateada/Silver Surfer, add you to this benign accumulation of Visual sweets because honey on pancakes, saying my grandmother. If the gentle reader was fan of the stories of Stan Lee and Jack Kirby has insured the entertainment. When you want to take a bath of purity, sure that will know where to go and what spiritual balsams take to comfort his sagging composure. |
3,399 | archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3086 | David Montag | Kárate a muerte en Torremolinos | 1 | 5 | muchocine | My favorite. For a server, it is the best bad ever movie. It has a something, an I do not know what, that makes it very special. As geek is a kind of greatness seems to emanate from it. | My favorite. For a server, it is the best bad ever movie. It has a something, an I do not know what, that makes it very special. As geek is a kind of greatness seems to emanate from it.Summarize them the argument: the Doctor Malvedades travels to Torremolinos to resurrect a monster half Octopus half spider crab called Jocántaro. Malvedades begins to kidnap Virgin for ritual sacrifice that he will rise again to the beast with the help of a few zombies karatecas but I have here that meets with the opposition of a few Catholic surfers trained by the ghost of master Miyagi, spectrum played by Jess Franco. are in agreement that argument only occur to a genius. Mad Genius, Yes, but genius at the end and after.It is not going over the non plus ultra of the freak. Beyond death in Torremolinos Karate is the unexplored. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.