MVH-Bench / README.md
SNU-ISLAB's picture
Update README.md
00f4158 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
5.54 kB
metadata
dataset_info:
  features:
    - name: group_id
      dtype: string
    - name: mvh_type
      dtype: string
    - name: category
      dtype: string
    - name: view_1
      dtype: image
    - name: view_2
      dtype: image
    - name: mc_questions
      list: string
    - name: mc_options
      list: string
    - name: mc_answers
      list: string
    - name: binary_questions
      list: string
    - name: binary_answers
      list: string
  splits:
    - name: validation
      num_bytes: 23895547
      num_examples: 80
    - name: test
      num_bytes: 196420891
      num_examples: 720
  download_size: 219687633
  dataset_size: 220316438
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: validation
        path: data/validation-*
      - split: test
        path: data/test-*
task_categories:
  - visual-question-answering
language:
  - en
tags:
  - multimodal,
  - multi-view,
  - hallucination,
  - multi-image,
  - egocentric,
  - exocentric,
  - visual-question-answering
pretty_name: MVH-Bench

MVH-Bench

MVH-Bench is the benchmark introduced in:

Revealing Multi-View Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Wooje Park*, Insu Lee*, Soohyun Kim, Jaeyun Jang, Minyoung Noh, Kyuhong Shim, and Byonghyo Shim (* Equal contribution)
EMNLP 2026 Main

Paper

MVH-Bench is a multi-view visual question answering benchmark designed to evaluate Multi-View Hallucination (MVH) in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs).

The dataset contains 4,800 question-answer pairs organized into 800 image-pair groups, with each group containing two multiple-choice questions and four binary questions.

Split Image-Pair Groups MC QA Binary QA Total QA
Validation 80 160 320 480
Test 720 1,440 2,880 4,320
Total 800 1,600 3,200 4,800

Categories

MVH-Bench contains two types of multi-view hallucination:

  • cross_view: hallucination caused by visual evidence from an incorrect viewpoint
  • cross_instance: hallucination caused by visual evidence from an incorrect instance

The benchmark contains four evaluation categories:

  • Action
  • Object
  • Numerical
  • Spatial

Each image-pair group contains two question formats:

  • Multiple Choice (MC)
  • Binary (Yes/No)

Dataset Structure

Each example corresponds to one image-pair group and contains the following fields:

  • group_id: unique group identifier
  • mvh_type: MVH type (cross_view or cross_instance)
  • category: question category
  • view_1: first image in the multi-view pair
  • view_2: second image in the multi-view pair
  • mc_questions: two multiple-choice questions
  • mc_options: three answer choices shared by the two MC questions
  • mc_answers: ground-truth answers for the two MC questions
  • binary_questions: four binary questions
  • binary_answers: ground-truth answers for the four binary questions

Usage

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset(
    "SNU-ISLAB/MVH-Bench",
    split="test",
)

sample = dataset[0]

print(sample["mvh_type"])
print(sample["category"])

print(sample["mc_questions"])
print(sample["mc_options"])
print(sample["mc_answers"])

print(sample["binary_questions"])
print(sample["binary_answers"])

view_1 = sample["view_1"]
view_2 = sample["view_2"]

The validation split can be loaded with:

validation = load_dataset(
    "SNU-ISLAB/MVH-Bench",
    split="validation",
)

Evaluation

For multiple-choice questions, we report:

  • Accuracy (Acc): accuracy over individual MC questions
  • Pair Accuracy (p-Acc): the proportion of image-pair groups in which both MC questions are answered correctly
  • Adversarial Error Rate (AER): among incorrect MC predictions, the proportion that select the adversarial alternative rather than the Neither option

For binary questions, we report:

  • Accuracy (Acc): accuracy over individual Yes/No questions
  • Pair Accuracy (p-Acc): the proportion of positive-negative question pairs in which both questions are answered correctly
  • Quad Accuracy (q-Acc): the proportion of image-pair groups in which all four binary questions are answered correctly
  • Yes Error Rate (YER): the proportion of erroneous binary predictions biased toward Yes

The overall MVH-Score jointly measures performance on the multiple-choice and binary evaluations:
MVH-Score = Binary Acc + Binary p-Acc + Binary q-Acc + MC Acc + MC p-Acc

AER and YER are reported as diagnostic error metrics and are not included in the MVH-Score.

Standardized evaluation for MVH-Bench is supported in lmms-eval.

Example

python -m lmms_eval \
  --model qwen2_5_vl \
  --model_args pretrained=Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct \
  --tasks mvh_bench \
  --batch_size 1

Available Tasks

  • mvh_bench: Full benchmark on the test split, including both cross-instance and cross-view evaluations
  • mvh_bench_val: Validation split
  • mvh_bench_cross_instance: Cross-instance subset of the test split
  • mvh_bench_cross_view: Cross-view subset of the test split

Citation

If you use MVH-Bench in your research, please cite:

@article{park2026revealing,
  title={Revealing Multi-View Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models},
  author={Park, Wooje and Lee, Insu and Kim, Soohyun and Jang, Jaeyun and Noh, Minyoung and Shim, Kyuhong and Shim, Byonghyo},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.23934},
  year={2026}
}