Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
model
stringclasses
10 values
native_seed
float64
0
1
⌀
native_lo
float64
0
1
⌀
native_hi
float64
0
1
⌀
native_pooled
float64
0
1
native_n
int64
0
519
native_rej
int64
0
8
native_n_seeds
int64
0
8
native_hint_seed
float64
0.35
0.89
⌀
native_hint_lo
float64
0.07
0.78
⌀
native_hint_hi
float64
0.66
0.98
⌀
native_hint_pooled
float64
0.29
0.96
⌀
native_hint_n
float64
35
317
⌀
native_hint_rej
float64
0
3
⌀
native_hint_n_seeds
float64
8
8
⌀
text_tools_seed
float64
0.34
1
text_tools_lo
float64
0.09
1
text_tools_hi
float64
0.5
1
text_tools_pooled
float64
0.3
1
text_tools_n
int64
8
110
text_tools_rej
int64
0
8
text_tools_n_seeds
int64
8
8
qwen2.5-coder:0.5b
0
0
0
0
9
0
8
0.346
0.067
0.659
0.287
317
2
8
0.344
0.094
0.594
0.852
54
1
8
qwen2.5-coder:1.5b
0.375
0.125
0.75
0.237
519
3
8
0.583
0.312
0.833
0.906
53
1
8
0.742
0.492
0.975
0.955
110
1
8
qwen2.5-coder:3b
0.228
0
0.549
0.786
42
0
8
0.823
0.575
0.979
0.96
176
3
8
0.837
0.702
0.958
0.896
77
1
8
qwen2.5-coder:7b
0.589
0.319
0.837
0.793
174
2
8
0.885
0.781
0.969
0.8
35
0
8
0.912
0.825
0.979
0.889
36
0
8
qwen2.5-coder:14b
0.595
0.383
0.772
0.737
57
0
8
0.796
0.625
0.944
0.708
89
0
8
0.915
0.856
0.979
0.882
34
0
8
llama3.2:latest
0.6
0.375
0.8
0.625
16
0
8
0.823
0.709
0.921
0.892
65
0
8
0.438
0.312
0.5
0.467
15
0
8
phi3:latest
null
null
null
0
0
8
0
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
0.375
0.125
0.75
0.3
10
0
8
gemma3:4b
null
null
null
0
0
8
0
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
gemma3:270m
null
null
null
0
0
8
0
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
0.375
0.125
0.75
0.375
8
4
8
deepseek-v4-flash
1
1
1
1
61
0
8
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
1
1
1
1
57
0
8

Serving-Stack Confounds in Local Tool-Use Evaluation

Result tables for Measuring the Serving Stack Instead of the Model: Hidden Confounds in Local Tool-Use Evaluation (Lijuan Tang, Yuemeng Zheng; REALM Workshop @ EMNLP 2026).

Per-seed protocol fidelity under three serving conditions

What this measures

Protocol fidelity = the rate of valid, in-schema tool calls over the turns the model actually produced. Requests the server refused (for example Ollama's HTTP 400 does not support tools for Phi-3 and Gemma-3) are counted separately as rejected and excluded from the denominator. A naive analysis that counts them as model non-calls reports a capable model at 0% even though it never ran.

Serving conditions:

condition tools= sent text tool list in prompt
native (default) yes no
native_hint yes yes
text_tools / tt no yes

All local models run on Ollama 0.30.8 with default (Q4_K_M) quantization; deepseek-v4-flash is a cloud anchor. A "seed" indexes a task instance; decoding is sampled at T=1.0.

Configs

serving_modes (default): aggregation task, 8 seeds, three conditions

For each condition prefix (native, native_hint, text_tools):

column meaning
<cond>_seed per-seed mean fidelity
<cond>_lo, <cond>_hi seed-level bootstrap 95% CI
<cond>_pooled turn-pooled fidelity
<cond>_n model-produced turns in the pool
<cond>_rej rejected requests (excluded from the denominator)
<cond>_n_seeds seeds with at least one produced turn

Empty cells mean the condition was not run or the rate is undefined (every request was rejected).

chain_compare: dependency-chain task, 4 seeds

native_* and tt_* (text-tools) with _seed (per-seed mean), _pool (turn-pooled), _n (turns), _rej (rejected requests).

crossstack: same tools= request on four serving stacks

One row per model; each cell is the outcome on that stack: 200_native (native tool_calls), 200_text / 200_text_json_block (call returned as text), 200_runs_text (request accepted, model runs), 200_prose_nocall / 200_text_prose (prose, no call), HTTP400_rejected (Ollama per-model gating), HTTP400_no_parser (vLLM without --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser), not_probed, n/a. vllm_configured is vLLM with tool parsing enabled. The vLLM and SGLang probes cover only the models shown.

humaneval_probe: single-turn replication on 6 HumanEval problems

native_gating is the Ollama response to tools= (- = not probed), then text_tools_valid of n problems produced a valid call under the text-tools protocol.

Citation

@inproceedings{tang-zheng-2026-measuring,
    title = "Measuring the Serving Stack Instead of the Model: Hidden Confounds in Local Tool-Use Evaluation",
    author = "Tang, Lijuan  and
      Zheng, Yuemeng",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second Workshop for {RE}search on Agent Language Models ({REALM} 2026)",
    month = oct,
    year = "2026",
    address = "Budapest, Hungary",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.realm-1.7/",
    doi = "10.18653/2026.realm-1.7",
    pages = "86--94"
}
Downloads last month
50

Paper for SandyTang/serving-confound-results