text stringlengths 0 58 |
|---|
accuracy: 0.673394495412844 |
f1: 0.7532347504621072 |
mcc: 0.2731513822415415 |
accuracy: 0.43989405052974734 |
accuracy: 0.6862745098039216 |
f1: 0.8095238095238095 |
mcc: 0.10227299881383177 |
accuracy: 0.5742574257425742 |
f1: 0.07194244604316546 |
mcc: 0.021875612870243824 |
accuracy: 0.7104625278258718 |
f1: 0.600668622501194 |
mcc: 0.37415736608969374 |
accuracy: 0.5107913669064749 |
f1: 0.48484848484848486 |
mcc: 0.019941920640703076 |
accuracy: 0.6923076923076923 |
f1: 0.5294117647058824 |
mcc: 0.3221899920504105 |
TEMPERATURE: 1.00 |
### FIELD ACCURACY |
syntax: 62.32 |
morphology: 70.77 |
syntax/semantics: 63.44 |
semantics: 58.39 |
### UID ACCURACY |
adjunct_island: 79.85 |
anaphor_gender_agreement: 70.65 |
anaphor_number_agreement: 81.31 |
animate_subject_passive: 69.72 |
animate_subject_trans: 82.56 |
causative: 49.63 |
complex_NP_island: 53.66 |
coordinate_structure_constraint_complex_left_branch: 31.35 |
coordinate_structure_constraint_object_extraction: 54.27 |
determiner_noun_agreement_1: 83.85 |
determiner_noun_agreement_2: 84.96 |
determiner_noun_agreement_irregular_1: 71.81 |
determiner_noun_agreement_irregular_2: 83.54 |
determiner_noun_agreement_with_adjective_1: 78.14 |
determiner_noun_agreement_with_adj_2: 84.38 |
determiner_noun_agreement_with_adj_irregular_1: 77.72 |
determiner_noun_agreement_with_adj_irregular_2: 78.45 |
distractor_agreement_relational_noun: 47.08 |
distractor_agreement_relative_clause: 40.07 |
drop_argument: 71.09 |
ellipsis_n_bar_1: 67.46 |
ellipsis_n_bar_2: 69.57 |
existential_there_object_raising: 65.02 |
existential_there_quantifiers_1: 92.37 |
existential_there_quantifiers_2: 45.66 |
existential_there_subject_raising: 69.70 |
expletive_it_object_raising: 68.12 |
inchoative: 42.81 |
intransitive: 64.06 |
irregular_past_participle_adjectives: 51.72 |
irregular_past_participle_verbs: 72.93 |
irregular_plural_subject_verb_agreement_1: 66.17 |
irregular_plural_subject_verb_agreement_2: 68.83 |
left_branch_island_echo_question: 49.63 |
left_branch_island_simple_question: 44.69 |
matrix_question_npi_licensor_present: 11.30 |
npi_present_1: 31.90 |
npi_present_2: 44.97 |
only_npi_licensor_present: 45.01 |
only_npi_scope: 38.71 |
passive_1: 79.05 |
passive_2: 73.86 |
principle_A_case_1: 100.00 |
principle_A_case_2: 72.68 |
principle_A_c_command: 59.41 |
principle_A_domain_1: 93.76 |
principle_A_domain_2: 61.53 |
principle_A_domain_3: 52.71 |
principle_A_reconstruction: 37.33 |
regular_plural_subject_verb_agreement_1: 68.76 |
regular_plural_subject_verb_agreement_2: 61.80 |
sentential_negation_npi_licensor_present: 98.69 |
sentential_negation_npi_scope: 52.24 |
sentential_subject_island: 44.12 |
superlative_quantifiers_1: 72.83 |
superlative_quantifiers_2: 79.41 |
tough_vs_raising_1: 36.92 |
tough_vs_raising_2: 81.30 |
transitive: 64.40 |
wh_island: 57.50 |
wh_questions_object_gap: 67.40 |
wh_questions_subject_gap: 87.08 |
wh_questions_subject_gap_long_distance: 88.68 |
wh_vs_that_no_gap: 92.10 |
wh_vs_that_no_gap_long_distance: 97.26 |
wh_vs_that_with_gap: 34.82 |
wh_vs_that_with_gap_long_distance: 10.99 |
### LINGUISTICS_TERM ACCURACY |
island_effects: 51.89 |
anaphor_agreement: 75.87 |
s-selection: 76.24 |
bind1 — BabyLM 2026 Strict-Small entry: full evaluation artifacts
Complete, per-item evaluation outputs for the
SecludedCorner/bind1-babylm2026-strict-small
entry and its ablation families, released so that every number we report is downloadable and
recomputable — including the negative results.
All outputs were produced by the official babylm-eval pipeline (zero-shot backend causal;
GLUE via the official fine-tuning protocol). Reports are the pipeline's own
best_temperature_report.txt; predictions are per-item.
Model families included (35 evaluation targets)
| Directory pattern | What it is | What it shows |
|---|---|---|
hf_loop2_full(_sN) |
the entry architecture, trained loop depth T=3, seeds 0–3 | main results |
hf_loop2_T1/T2/T4(_sN) |
same weights, forced inference depth T=1/2/4 | the T-sweep: iteration helps grammar in all seeds, erodes healthy-write entity tracking, and partially rebuilds the one collapsed write |
hf_loop2_sever(_sN) |
same weights, verdict-to-trust edge zeroed at inference | inference-inertness of the feedback edge (4/4 seeds) |
hf_loop2_novg(_sN) (+_ti1) |
retrained from scratch with the edge frozen | training-scaffold evidence (seed-conditional: 3/4) |
hf_baseline_full(_sN) |
size-matched plain-decoder monolith, seeds 0–3 | the paired control for every claim |
hf_loop_full |
the earlier bypassed variant (v=1.0, loop inert) | the audit-caught failure kept as a diagnostic |
Internal (logical) experiment ids map to these physical names as
bind1_tt3_sN = hf_loop2_full(_sN), bind1_tt3_sN_ti{K} = hf_loop2_T{K}(_sN),
mono_sN = hf_baseline_full(_sN), bind1_tt3_sN_novg = hf_loop2_novg(_sN).
Layout
results/<model>/zero_shot/causal/<task>/<subset>/
best_temperature_report.txt # official aggregate report
predictions.json # per-item predictions
results/hf_loop2_full/finetune/<task>/results.txt # official GLUE protocol (entry)
results/hf_baseline_full/finetune/<task>/results.txt # official GLUE protocol (control)
scripts/oracle_best_of_T.py # best-of-T oracle + chance-null recovery analysis
scripts/make_t_variant.py # builds the forced-T inference variants (config-only clones)
patches/compute_results_per_item_is_correct.diff # additive patch to the official pipeline
Per-item correctness (is_correct)
Entity-tracking predictions.json records include pred_idx / gold_idx / is_correct,
added by the additive patch in patches/ (the official id/pred fields and all scoring
logic are untouched; patched reruns reproduce the official aggregates exactly, 12/12 checked).
This is what makes the chance-null analysis possible: for answers the single-pass model got
wrong and iteration changed, a memoryless re-roll lands on gold ~25% of the time (5 options).
Recovery at ~25% = re-rolled noise; recovery far above = real signal. Both verdicts occur in
this data — ~25% in the three healthy-write seeds, 37–45% in the collapsed-write seed —
which is the evidence behind the model card's "iteration as a backup pathway" note.
Recompute it yourself:
python scripts/oracle_best_of_T.py bind1_tt3_s0 # any of s0..s3
(The script expects the experiment-archive layout; adapt the paths at the top, or read the
predictions files directly — the schema is one JSON object per subset with a predictions list.)
Scope note
This dataset now covers both the entry generation's ablation families and the
training-time-depth study (hf_bind1_tt1_s0..s9: ten seeds trained single-pass — the
capability never forms; see the ablations model repo for the loadable checkpoints). Nothing in this dataset
was selected post-hoc: every ablation family we ran on the entry generation is present,
including the ones that falsified our own pre-registered predictions.
Citation
Yulin Yang (ORCID 0009-0007-4827-8449). A Microkernel Language Model: Reasoning as Mutually-Supporting Aggregates, and Why Its Parts Must Be Judged Together. BabyLM Challenge 2026 (Strict-Small track) submission.
- Downloads last month
- -