Shanmuk4622's picture
Generate dataset card + paper tables + plots (21 files)
a55962d verified
metadata
license: apache-2.0
language:
  - en
tags:
  - energy-aware-training
  - image-classification
  - model-efficiency
  - ablation-study
  - effnetv2_s
datasets:
  - cifar10
  - cifar100
  - tiny-imagenet
library_name: pytorch
pretty_name: 'E2AM ablation: EfficientNetV2-S'

E2AM Ablation Results: EfficientNetV2-S

Energy-aware training ablation study for EfficientNetV2-S across three image-classification datasets: CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet.

Each dataset has 15 training variants (8 individual-method M0..M7, 7 cumulative ablation C0..C6) at 50 epochs, plus a 5-variant deployment pipeline (FP32 baseline, structured pruning, pruning+finetune, INT8 quantization, pruned+INT8).

Status: 45 completed variants, 0 partial.

Quick links

Headline results

Dataset Best variant Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (sec)
CIFAR-10 C5_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr_l1 0.9040 0.9977 0.1006 0.0478 4909
CIFAR-100 C4_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr 0.7096 0.9251 0.0954 0.0453 4587
Tiny-ImageNet M7_full_e2am 0.5805 0.8162 0.2005 0.0952 9683

Cross-dataset comparison

How the same training variants behave across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet.

Accuracy By Variant Across Datasets

accuracy_by_variant_across_datasets

Energy By Variant Across Datasets

energy_by_variant_across_datasets

Per-dataset results

CIFAR-10

M-matrix (individual methods)

Variant Epochs Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (s) Status
M0_baseline_fp32 50 0.7565 0.9839 0.2080 0.0988 9714 completed
M1_cache_only 50 0.7582 0.9851 0.1963 0.0932 9440 completed
M2_amp_only 50 0.8013 0.9909 0.0986 0.0469 4775 completed
M3_grad_accum_only 50 0.8036 0.9903 0.1955 0.0928 9403 completed
M4_l1_sparsity_only 50 0.7394 0.9837 0.2097 0.0996 9834 completed
M5_adaptive_lr_only 50 0.8841 0.9969 0.1963 0.0933 9454 completed
M6_eag_only 50 0.7590 0.9854 0.2080 0.0988 9713 completed
M7_full_e2am 50 0.8974 0.9967 0.1005 0.0477 4847 completed

C-matrix (cumulative ablation)

Variant Epochs Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (s) Status
C0_baseline 50 0.7569 0.9865 0.1988 0.0944 9591 completed
C1_cache 50 0.7472 0.9862 0.1985 0.0943 9556 completed
C2_cache_amp 50 0.8068 0.9913 0.0988 0.0469 4824 completed
C3_cache_amp_gradaccum 50 0.8345 0.9937 0.0988 0.0469 4810 completed
C4_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr 50 0.8973 0.9971 0.0989 0.0470 4825 completed
C5_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr_l1 50 0.9040 0.9977 0.1006 0.0478 4909 completed
C6_full_e2am 50 0.9040 0.9977 0.1007 0.0478 4915 completed

accuracy_bar.png

energy_bar.png

co2_bar.png

accuracy_vs_energy_scatter.png

CIFAR-100

M-matrix (individual methods)

Variant Epochs Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (s) Status
M0_baseline_fp32 50 0.3900 0.7104 0.1990 0.0945 9332 completed
M1_cache_only 50 0.4190 0.7465 0.1992 0.0946 9689 completed
M2_amp_only 50 0.5240 0.8238 0.0956 0.0454 4608 completed
M3_grad_accum_only 50 0.5408 0.8365 0.1984 0.0943 9629 completed
M4_l1_sparsity_only 50 0.4378 0.7671 0.2019 0.0959 9629 completed
M5_adaptive_lr_only 50 0.5975 0.8641 0.1995 0.0948 9678 completed
M6_eag_only 50 0.4010 0.7281 0.1999 0.0950 9520 completed
M7_full_e2am 50 0.7090 0.9254 0.1025 0.0487 4970 completed

C-matrix (cumulative ablation)

Variant Epochs Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (s) Status
C0_baseline 50 0.4075 0.7359 0.1999 0.0950 9529 completed
C1_cache 50 0.4502 0.7700 0.1998 0.0949 9533 completed
C2_cache_amp 50 0.5411 0.8401 0.0982 0.0466 4756 completed
C3_cache_amp_gradaccum 50 0.6111 0.8775 0.0953 0.0453 4578 completed
C4_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr 50 0.7096 0.9251 0.0954 0.0453 4587 completed
C5_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr_l1 50 0.7016 0.9205 0.0968 0.0460 4672 completed
C6_full_e2am 50 0.7017 0.9191 0.0999 0.0475 4812 completed

accuracy_bar.png

energy_bar.png

co2_bar.png

accuracy_vs_energy_scatter.png

Tiny-ImageNet

M-matrix (individual methods)

Variant Epochs Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (s) Status
M0_baseline_fp32 50 0.2462 0.5170 0.3952 0.1877 18949 completed
M1_cache_only 50 0.2451 0.5128 0.3944 0.1873 19008 completed
M2_amp_only 50 0.3541 0.6305 0.1937 0.0920 9387 completed
M3_grad_accum_only 50 0.3467 0.6401 0.3921 0.1863 18791 completed
M4_l1_sparsity_only 50 0.2440 0.5172 0.4054 0.1926 19502 completed
M5_adaptive_lr_only 50 0.4611 0.7419 0.3979 0.1890 19208 completed
M6_eag_only 50 0.2606 0.5416 0.3992 0.1896 19319 completed
M7_full_e2am 50 0.5805 0.8162 0.2005 0.0952 9683 completed

C-matrix (cumulative ablation)

Variant Epochs Top-1 Top-5 Energy (kWh) CO₂ (kg) Time (s) Status
C0_baseline 50 0.2475 0.5199 0.4119 0.1957 19800 completed
C1_cache 50 0.2502 0.5186 0.4014 0.1907 19312 completed
C2_cache_amp 50 0.3465 0.6300 0.1980 0.0940 9633 completed
C3_cache_amp_gradaccum 50 0.4436 0.7242 0.2012 0.0956 9766 completed
C4_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr 50 0.5738 0.8162 0.2026 0.0963 9831 completed
C5_cache_amp_gradaccum_adaptivelr_l1 50 0.5708 0.8125 0.2053 0.0975 9943 completed
C6_full_e2am 50 0.5708 0.8125 0.2053 0.0975 9939 completed

accuracy_bar.png

energy_bar.png

co2_bar.png

accuracy_vs_energy_scatter.png

Deployment results

No deployment results in this repo yet.

Methodology

Model: EfficientNetV2-S (~20.2M params).

Training protocol: from scratch, SGD with momentum 0.9, weight decay 5e-4, initial LR 0.1, 50 epochs, 1 warmup epoch. All variants share the same protocol so ablation comparison stays apples-to-apples across the matrix.

Input: native dataset resolution upsampled to 128x128 in-model via nn.Upsample (FX-traceable to keep D3/D4 INT8 quantization possible).

Optimization toggles (the 5 individual methods and their cumulative combinations):

Method Mechanism
Tensor cache Training images held in RAM as a normalized float tensor
AMP torch.cuda.amp.autocast + GradScaler
Grad accum (x2) Accumulate gradients across 2 mini-batches
L1 sparsity Lambda * sum(
Cosine LR lr(t) = lr_max * 0.5 * (1 + cos(pi*t/T))
EAG early-stop Energy-Aware Gain: stop when accuracy gain per joule plateaus

Energy measurement: GPU power sampled at 1 Hz via nvidia-smi --query-gpu=power.draw. Energy = trapezoidal integration over power-vs-time. CO₂ = energy_kWh * 0.475 (global average grid intensity).

Hardware: Single NVIDIA T4 (14.5 GB) on Kaggle.

Repository structure

runs/
  cifar10/
  cifar100/
  tiny_imagenet/
    individual_methods/M0..M7/   (history.csv, metrics_summary.json,
                                  best_model.pt, last_model.pt, config.yaml)
    cumulative_ablation/C0..C6/  (same)
paper_tables/                     (6 unified CSV tables)
comparison_plots/<dataset>/       (per-dataset plots)
comparison_plots/cross_dataset/   (cross-dataset plots)
README.md                         (this file)

Reproducibility

Each variant directory has a config.yaml with the exact configuration used. To reproduce:

  1. huggingface-cli download Shanmuk4622/E2AM_EfficientNetV2_S --repo-type dataset
  2. Load the e2am.py library and call the appropriate config factory
  3. Run e2am.train_one_run(cfg)

Limitations

  • Energy measurement is GPU-only (via nvidia-smi); CPU/memory power not included
  • Pruning is mask-based; no wall-clock speedup without sparsity-aware runtime
  • INT8 (D3/D4) is CPU FX static quantization (fbgemm); may fail on transformer blocks. Failures logged in metrics.json rather than crashing.
  • Single-T4 reproduction; multi-GPU not validated
  • SGD@0.1 is suboptimal for some architectures; the paper compares variant-to-variant deltas which remain meaningful regardless

Citation

@misc{e2am_ablation_effnetv2s,
  title  = {E2AM: Energy-Aware Adaptive Model Training Ablation Study (EfficientNetV2-S)},
  author = {Shanmuk},
  year   = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/Shanmuk4622/E2AM_EfficientNetV2_S}},
}

This README was auto-generated on 2026-06-06 12:40 UTC. Source repo: Shanmuk4622/E2AM_EfficientNetV2_S