Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
#align ordnode.pos_size_of_mem Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem
theorem findMin'_dual : ∀ (t) (x : α), findMin' (dual t) x = findMax' x t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node _ _ x r, _ => findMin'_dual r x
#align ordnode.find_min'_dual Ordnode.findMin'_dual
theorem findMax'_dual (t) (x : α) : findMax' x (dual t) = findMin' t x := by
rw [← findMin'_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max'_dual Ordnode.findMax'_dual
theorem findMin_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, findMin (dual t) = findMax t
| nil => rfl
| node _ _ _ _ => congr_arg some <| findMin'_dual _ _
#align ordnode.find_min_dual Ordnode.findMin_dual
theorem findMax_dual (t : Ordnode α) : findMax (dual t) = findMin t := by
rw [← findMin_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max_dual Ordnode.findMax_dual
theorem dual_eraseMin : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (eraseMin t) = eraseMax (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ nil x r => rfl
| node _ (node sz l' y r') x r => by
rw [eraseMin, dual_balanceR, dual_eraseMin (node sz l' y r'), dual, dual, dual, eraseMax]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_min Ordnode.dual_eraseMin
theorem dual_eraseMax (t : Ordnode α) : dual (eraseMax t) = eraseMin (dual t) := by
rw [← dual_dual (eraseMin _), dual_eraseMin, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_max Ordnode.dual_eraseMax
theorem splitMin_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMin' l x r = (findMin' l x, eraseMin (node s l x r))
| _, nil, x, r => rfl
| _, node ls ll lx lr, x, r => by rw [splitMin', splitMin_eq ls ll lx lr, findMin', eraseMin]
#align ordnode.split_min_eq Ordnode.splitMin_eq
theorem splitMax_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMax' l x r = (eraseMax (node s l x r), findMax' x r)
| _, l, x, nil => rfl
| _, l, x, node ls ll lx lr => by rw [splitMax', splitMax_eq ls ll lx lr, findMax', eraseMax]
#align ordnode.split_max_eq Ordnode.splitMax_eq
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMin'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (t) (x : α), All P t → P x → P (findMin' t x)
| nil, _x, _, hx => hx
| node _ ll lx _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂, _⟩, _ => findMin'_all ll lx h₁ h₂
#align ordnode.find_min'_all Ordnode.findMin'_all
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMax'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) (t), P x → All P t → P (findMax' x t)
| _x, nil, hx, _ => hx
| _, node _ _ lx lr, _, ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩ => findMax'_all lx lr h₂ h₃
#align ordnode.find_max'_all Ordnode.findMax'_all
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_left (t : Ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_left Ordnode.merge_nil_left
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_right (t : Ordnode α) : merge nil t = t :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_right Ordnode.merge_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then balanceL (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then balanceR ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_node Ordnode.merge_node
theorem dual_insert [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (Ordnode.insert x t) = @Ordnode.insert αᵒᵈ _ _ x (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
have : @cmpLE αᵒᵈ _ _ x y = cmpLE y x := rfl
rw [Ordnode.insert, dual, Ordnode.insert, this, ← cmpLE_swap x y]
cases cmpLE x y <;>
simp [Ordering.swap, Ordnode.insert, dual_balanceL, dual_balanceR, dual_insert]
#align ordnode.dual_insert Ordnode.dual_insert
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r) : @balance α l x r = balance' l x r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· rw [sr.eq_node'] at hr ⊢
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr <;> cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotateL]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node']; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.2.1.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos))
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rw [sl.eq_node'] at hl ⊢
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node']; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.2.2.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· apply Nat.not_lt_zero
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos))
· simp [balance, balance']
symm; rw [if_neg]
· split_ifs with h h_1
· have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h
rwa [sr.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr
· rw [size, zero_add] at rd
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr
· exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateL]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node', sr.1]; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1]; abel
· have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1
rwa [sl.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr
· rw [size, zero_add] at ld
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr
· exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateR]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node', sl.1]; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1]; abel
· simp [node']
· exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sl.pos) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sr.pos))
#align ordnode.balance_eq_balance' Ordnode.balance_eq_balance'
theorem balanceL_eq_balance {l x r} (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r) (H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balanceL α l x r = balance l x r := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0 := by
have := H1 rfl
rwa [size, sr.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
rw [sr.eq_node']; rfl
· replace H2 : ¬rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos)
simp [balanceL, balance, H2]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance
def Raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n ∨ m = n + 1
#align ordnode.raised Ordnode.Raised
theorem raised_iff {n m} : Raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 := by
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, Nat.le_succ _⟩
· exact ⟨Nat.le_succ _, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁)
#align ordnode.raised_iff Ordnode.raised_iff
theorem Raised.dist_le {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist n m ≤ 1 := by
cases' raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2; rwa [Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, tsub_le_iff_left]
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le Ordnode.Raised.dist_le
theorem Raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist m n ≤ 1 := by
rw [Nat.dist_comm]; exact H.dist_le
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le' Ordnode.Raised.dist_le'
theorem Raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (k + n) (k + m) := by
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.add_left Ordnode.Raised.add_left
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 808 | 809 | theorem Raised.add_right (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (n + k) (m + k) := by |
rw [add_comm, add_comm m]; exact H.add_left _
|
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
#align_import topology.algebra.order.left_right from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
open Set Filter Topology
section TopologicalSpace
variable {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem nhds_left_sup_nhds_right (a : α) : 𝓝[≤] a ⊔ 𝓝[≥] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_union, Iic_union_Ici, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_left_sup_nhds_right nhds_left_sup_nhds_right
theorem nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right (a : α) : 𝓝[<] a ⊔ 𝓝[≥] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_union, Iio_union_Ici, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right
theorem nhds_left_sup_nhds_right' (a : α) : 𝓝[≤] a ⊔ 𝓝[>] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_union, Iic_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_left_sup_nhds_right' nhds_left_sup_nhds_right'
theorem nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right' (a : α) : 𝓝[<] a ⊔ 𝓝[>] a = 𝓝[≠] a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_union, Iio_union_Ioi]
#align nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right' nhds_left'_sup_nhds_right'
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRight.lean | 127 | 129 | theorem continuousAt_iff_continuous_left_right {a : α} {f : α → β} :
ContinuousAt f a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic a) a ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by |
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, ContinuousAt, ← tendsto_sup, nhds_left_sup_nhds_right]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.egorov from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [MetricSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
namespace Egorov
def notConvergentSeq [Preorder ι] (f : ι → α → β) (g : α → β) (n : ℕ) (j : ι) : Set α :=
⋃ (k) (_ : j ≤ k), { x | 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) }
#align measure_theory.egorov.not_convergent_seq MeasureTheory.Egorov.notConvergentSeq
variable {n : ℕ} {i j : ι} {s : Set α} {ε : ℝ} {f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem mem_notConvergentSeq_iff [Preorder ι] {x : α} :
x ∈ notConvergentSeq f g n j ↔ ∃ k ≥ j, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ) < dist (f k x) (g x) := by
simp_rw [notConvergentSeq, Set.mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_setOf]
#align measure_theory.egorov.mem_not_convergent_seq_iff MeasureTheory.Egorov.mem_notConvergentSeq_iff
theorem notConvergentSeq_antitone [Preorder ι] : Antitone (notConvergentSeq f g n) :=
fun _ _ hjk => Set.iUnion₂_mono' fun l hl => ⟨l, le_trans hjk hl, Set.Subset.rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.egorov.not_convergent_seq_antitone MeasureTheory.Egorov.notConvergentSeq_antitone
theorem measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι]
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
μ (s ∩ ⋂ j, notConvergentSeq f g n j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_atTop, ae_iff] at hfg
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← hfg]
refine measure_mono fun x => ?_
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, ge_iff_le, mem_notConvergentSeq_iff]
push_neg
rintro ⟨hmem, hx⟩
refine ⟨hmem, 1 / (n + 1 : ℝ), Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat, fun N => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂⟩ := hx N
exact ⟨n, hn₁, hn₂.le⟩
#align measure_theory.egorov.measure_inter_not_convergent_seq_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Egorov.measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero
theorem notConvergentSeq_measurableSet [Preorder ι] [Countable ι]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable[m] (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
MeasurableSet (notConvergentSeq f g n j) :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun k =>
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ =>
StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_lt stronglyMeasurable_const <| (hf k).dist hg
#align measure_theory.egorov.not_convergent_seq_measurable_set MeasureTheory.Egorov.notConvergentSeq_measurableSet
theorem measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero [SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι]
(hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
Tendsto (fun j => μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with h h
· have : (fun j => μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j)) = fun j => 0 := by
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [this]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
rw [← measure_inter_notConvergentSeq_eq_zero hfg n, Set.inter_iInter]
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => hsm.inter <| notConvergentSeq_measurableSet hf hg)
(fun k l hkl => Set.inter_subset_inter_right _ <| notConvergentSeq_antitone hkl)
⟨h.some, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hs (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left)⟩
#align measure_theory.egorov.measure_not_convergent_seq_tendsto_zero MeasureTheory.Egorov.measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero
variable [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι] [Countable ι]
theorem exists_notConvergentSeq_lt (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
∃ j : ι, μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n j) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n) := by
have ⟨N, hN⟩ := (ENNReal.tendsto_atTop ENNReal.zero_ne_top).1
(measure_notConvergentSeq_tendsto_zero hf hg hsm hs hfg n) (ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n)) (by
rw [gt_iff_lt, ENNReal.ofReal_pos]
exact mul_pos hε (pow_pos (by norm_num) n))
rw [zero_add] at hN
exact ⟨N, (hN N le_rfl).2⟩
#align measure_theory.egorov.exists_not_convergent_seq_lt MeasureTheory.Egorov.exists_notConvergentSeq_lt
def notConvergentSeqLTIndex (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) : ι :=
Classical.choose <| exists_notConvergentSeq_lt hε hf hg hsm hs hfg n
#align measure_theory.egorov.not_convergent_seq_lt_index MeasureTheory.Egorov.notConvergentSeqLTIndex
theorem notConvergentSeqLTIndex_spec (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) (n : ℕ) :
μ (s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n (notConvergentSeqLTIndex hε hf hg hsm hs hfg n)) ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ε * 2⁻¹ ^ n) :=
Classical.choose_spec <| exists_notConvergentSeq_lt hε hf hg hsm hs hfg n
#align measure_theory.egorov.not_convergent_seq_lt_index_spec MeasureTheory.Egorov.notConvergentSeqLTIndex_spec
def iUnionNotConvergentSeq (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) : Set α :=
⋃ n, s ∩ notConvergentSeq f g n (notConvergentSeqLTIndex (half_pos hε) hf hg hsm hs hfg n)
#align measure_theory.egorov.Union_not_convergent_seq MeasureTheory.Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq
theorem iUnionNotConvergentSeq_measurableSet (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
MeasurableSet <| iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg :=
MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => hsm.inter <| notConvergentSeq_measurableSet hf hg
#align measure_theory.egorov.Union_not_convergent_seq_measurable_set MeasureTheory.Egorov.iUnionNotConvergentSeq_measurableSet
theorem measure_iUnionNotConvergentSeq (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
μ (iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
refine le_trans (measure_iUnion_le _) (le_trans
(ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum <| notConvergentSeqLTIndex_spec (half_pos hε) hf hg hsm hs hfg) ?_)
simp_rw [ENNReal.ofReal_mul (half_pos hε).le]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ← ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg, inv_eq_one_div, tsum_geometric_two,
← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (half_pos hε).le, div_mul_cancel₀ ε two_ne_zero]
· intro n; positivity
· rw [inv_eq_one_div]
exact summable_geometric_two
#align measure_theory.egorov.measure_Union_not_convergent_seq MeasureTheory.Egorov.measure_iUnionNotConvergentSeq
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Egorov.lean | 160 | 165 | theorem iUnionNotConvergentSeq_subset (hε : 0 < ε) (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n))
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) (hsm : MeasurableSet s) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
iUnionNotConvergentSeq hε hf hg hsm hs hfg ⊆ s := by |
rw [iUnionNotConvergentSeq, ← Set.inter_iUnion]
exact Set.inter_subset_left
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Surreal.Basic
#align_import set_theory.surreal.dyadic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
universe u
namespace SetTheory
namespace PGame
def powHalf : ℕ → PGame
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => ⟨PUnit, PUnit, 0, fun _ => powHalf n⟩
#align pgame.pow_half SetTheory.PGame.powHalf
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_zero : powHalf 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_zero SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_zero
theorem powHalf_leftMoves (n) : (powHalf n).LeftMoves = PUnit := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_leftMoves
theorem powHalf_zero_rightMoves : (powHalf 0).RightMoves = PEmpty :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_zero_rightMoves
theorem powHalf_succ_rightMoves (n) : (powHalf (n + 1)).RightMoves = PUnit :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_rightMoves
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_moveLeft (n i) : (powHalf n).moveLeft i = 0 := by cases n <;> cases i <;> rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_move_left SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_moveLeft
@[simp]
theorem powHalf_succ_moveRight (n i) : (powHalf (n + 1)).moveRight i = powHalf n :=
rfl
#align pgame.pow_half_succ_move_right SetTheory.PGame.powHalf_succ_moveRight
instance uniquePowHalfLeftMoves (n) : Unique (powHalf n).LeftMoves := by
cases n <;> exact PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_pow_half_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniquePowHalfLeftMoves
instance isEmpty_powHalf_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (powHalf 0).RightMoves :=
inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)
#align pgame.is_empty_pow_half_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_powHalf_zero_rightMoves
instance uniquePowHalfSuccRightMoves (n) : Unique (powHalf (n + 1)).RightMoves :=
PUnit.unique
#align pgame.unique_pow_half_succ_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniquePowHalfSuccRightMoves
@[simp]
theorem birthday_half : birthday (powHalf 1) = 2 := by
rw [birthday_def]; simp
#align pgame.birthday_half SetTheory.PGame.birthday_half
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Surreal/Dyadic.lean | 90 | 95 | theorem numeric_powHalf (n) : (powHalf n).Numeric := by |
induction' n with n hn
· exact numeric_one
· constructor
· simpa using hn.moveLeft_lt default
· exact ⟨fun _ => numeric_zero, fun _ => hn⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
open Topology InnerProductSpace Set
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
variable {f : F → 𝕜} {f' x : F}
def HasGradientAtFilter (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) (L : Filter F) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x L
def HasGradientWithinAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' : F) (s : Set F) (x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
def HasGradientAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
def gradientWithin (f : F → 𝕜) (s : Set F) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)
def gradient (f : F → 𝕜) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderiv 𝕜 f x)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Gradient] notation "∇" => gradient
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped Gradient
variable {s : Set F} {L : Filter F}
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set F} :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {s : Set F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f frechet s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} :
HasFDerivAt f frechet x ↔ HasGradientAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
alias ⟨HasGradientWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt, _⟩ := hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt
alias ⟨HasGradientAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivAt.hasGradientAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ∇ f x = 0 := by
rw [gradient, fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
theorem HasGradientAt.unique {gradf gradg : F}
(hf : HasGradientAt f gradf x) (hg : HasGradientAt f gradg x) :
gradf = gradg :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).injective (hf.hasFDerivAt.unique hg.hasFDerivAt)
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, gradient, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderiv 𝕜 f x)]
exact h.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasGradientAt.differentiableAt (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasGradientWithinAt f (gradientWithin f s x) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, gradientWithin,
(toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)]
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasGradientWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_univ : HasGradientWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasGradientAt f f' x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt]
exact hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasGradientAt
theorem HasGradientAt.gradient (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) : ∇ f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasGradientAt.unique h
theorem gradient_eq {f' : F → F} (h : ∀ x, HasGradientAt f (f' x) x) : ∇ f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).gradient
open Filter
section Const
variable (c : 𝕜) (s x L)
theorem hasGradientAtFilter_const : HasGradientAtFilter (fun _ => c) 0 x L := by
rw [HasGradientAtFilter, map_zero]; apply hasFDerivAtFilter_const c x L
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_const : HasGradientWithinAt (fun _ => c) 0 s x :=
hasGradientAtFilter_const _ _ _
theorem hasGradientAt_const : HasGradientAt (fun _ => c) 0 x :=
hasGradientAtFilter_const _ _ _
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Gradient/Basic.lean | 313 | 314 | theorem gradient_const : ∇ (fun _ => c) x = 0 := by |
rw [gradient, fderiv_const, Pi.zero_apply, map_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Linear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ShortComplex.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.homology.homotopy from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"618ea3d5c99240cd7000d8376924906a148bf9ff"
universe v u
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Category Limits HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [Preadditive V]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} {C D E : HomologicalComplex V c}
variable (f g : C ⟶ D) (h k : D ⟶ E) (i : ι)
section
def dNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => C.d i (c.next i) ≫ f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.comp_add _ _ _ _ _ _
#align d_next dNext
def fromNext (i : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.xNext i ⟶ D.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f (c.next i) i) fun _ _ => rfl
#align from_next fromNext
@[simp]
theorem dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) :
dNext i f = C.dFrom i ≫ fromNext i f :=
rfl
#align d_next_eq_d_from_from_next dNext_eq_dFrom_fromNext
theorem dNext_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {i i' : ι} (w : c.Rel i i') :
dNext i f = C.d i i' ≫ f i' i := by
obtain rfl := c.next_eq' w
rfl
#align d_next_eq dNext_eq
lemma dNext_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel i (c.next i)) :
dNext i f = 0 := by
dsimp [dNext]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, zero_comp]
@[simp 1100]
theorem dNext_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f i ≫ dNext i g :=
(f.comm_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align d_next_comp_left dNext_comp_left
@[simp 1100]
theorem dNext_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (i : ι) :
(dNext i fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = dNext i f ≫ g.f i :=
(assoc _ _ _).symm
#align d_next_comp_right dNext_comp_right
def prevD (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.X j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j) ≫ D.d (c.prev j) j) fun _ _ =>
Preadditive.add_comp _ _ _ _ _ _
#align prev_d prevD
lemma prevD_eq_zero (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (i : ι) (hi : ¬ c.Rel (c.prev i) i) :
prevD i f = 0 := by
dsimp [prevD]
rw [shape _ _ _ hi, comp_zero]
def toPrev (j : ι) : (∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) →+ (C.X j ⟶ D.xPrev j) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => f j (c.prev j)) fun _ _ => rfl
#align to_prev toPrev
@[simp]
theorem prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (j : ι) :
prevD j f = toPrev j f ≫ D.dTo j :=
rfl
#align prev_d_eq_to_prev_d_to prevD_eq_toPrev_dTo
theorem prevD_eq (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) {j j' : ι} (w : c.Rel j' j) :
prevD j f = f j j' ≫ D.d j' j := by
obtain rfl := c.prev_eq' w
rfl
#align prev_d_eq prevD_eq
@[simp 1100]
theorem prevD_comp_left (f : C ⟶ D) (g : ∀ i j, D.X i ⟶ E.X j) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f.f i ≫ g i j) = f.f j ≫ prevD j g :=
assoc _ _ _
#align prev_d_comp_left prevD_comp_left
@[simp 1100]
theorem prevD_comp_right (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) (j : ι) :
(prevD j fun i j => f i j ≫ g.f j) = prevD j f ≫ g.f j := by
dsimp [prevD]
simp only [assoc, g.comm]
#align prev_d_comp_right prevD_comp_right
theorem dNext_nat (C D : ChainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
dNext i f = C.d i (i - 1) ≫ f (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [dNext]
cases i
· simp only [shape, ChainComplex.next_nat_zero, ComplexShape.down_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, zero_comp]
· congr <;> simp
#align d_next_nat dNext_nat
theorem prevD_nat (C D : CochainComplex V ℕ) (i : ℕ) (f : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) :
prevD i f = f i (i - 1) ≫ D.d (i - 1) i := by
dsimp [prevD]
cases i
· simp only [shape, CochainComplex.prev_nat_zero, ComplexShape.up_Rel, Nat.one_ne_zero,
not_false_iff, comp_zero]
· congr <;> simp
#align prev_d_nat prevD_nat
-- Porting note(#5171): removed @[has_nonempty_instance]
@[ext]
structure Homotopy (f g : C ⟶ D) where
hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j
zero : ∀ i j, ¬c.Rel j i → hom i j = 0 := by aesop_cat
comm : ∀ i, f.f i = dNext i hom + prevD i hom + g.f i := by aesop_cat
#align homotopy Homotopy
variable {f g}
namespace Homotopy
def equivSubZero : Homotopy f g ≃ Homotopy (f - g) 0 where
toFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun i j w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simp [h.comm] }
invFun h :=
{ hom := fun i j => h.hom i j
zero := fun i j w => h.zero _ _ w
comm := fun i => by simpa [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] using h.comm i }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
#align homotopy.equiv_sub_zero Homotopy.equivSubZero
@[simps]
def ofEq (h : f = g) : Homotopy f g where
hom := 0
zero _ _ _ := rfl
#align homotopy.of_eq Homotopy.ofEq
@[simps!, refl]
def refl (f : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy f f :=
ofEq (rfl : f = f)
#align homotopy.refl Homotopy.refl
@[simps!, symm]
def symm {f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy g f where
hom := -h.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.neg_apply, h.zero i j w, neg_zero]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_neg, AddMonoidHom.map_neg, h.comm, ← neg_add, ← add_assoc, neg_add_self,
zero_add]
#align homotopy.symm Homotopy.symm
@[simps!, trans]
def trans {e f g : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (k : Homotopy f g) : Homotopy e g where
hom := h.hom + k.hom
zero i j w := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h.zero i j w, k.zero i j w, zero_add]
comm i := by
rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, AddMonoidHom.map_add, h.comm, k.comm]
abel
#align homotopy.trans Homotopy.trans
@[simps!]
def add {f₁ g₁ f₂ g₂ : C ⟶ D} (h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) :
Homotopy (f₁ + f₂) (g₁ + g₂) where
hom := h₁.hom + h₂.hom
zero i j hij := by rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, h₁.zero i j hij, h₂.zero i j hij, add_zero]
comm i := by
simp only [HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, h₁.comm, h₂.comm, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
abel
#align homotopy.add Homotopy.add
@[simps!]
def smul {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Linear R V] (h : Homotopy f g) (a : R) :
Homotopy (a • f) (a • g) where
hom i j := a • h.hom i j
zero i j hij := by
dsimp
rw [h.zero i j hij, smul_zero]
comm i := by
dsimp
rw [h.comm]
dsimp [fromNext, toPrev]
simp only [smul_add, Linear.comp_smul, Linear.smul_comp]
@[simps]
def compRight {e f : C ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy e f) (g : D ⟶ E) : Homotopy (e ≫ g) (f ≫ g) where
hom i j := h.hom i j ≫ g.f j
zero i j w := by dsimp; rw [h.zero i j w, zero_comp]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_right, prevD_comp_right, Preadditive.add_comp,
comp_f, Preadditive.add_comp]
#align homotopy.comp_right Homotopy.compRight
@[simps]
def compLeft {f g : D ⟶ E} (h : Homotopy f g) (e : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (e ≫ f) (e ≫ g) where
hom i j := e.f i ≫ h.hom i j
zero i j w := by dsimp; rw [h.zero i j w, comp_zero]
comm i := by rw [comp_f, h.comm i, dNext_comp_left, prevD_comp_left, comp_f,
Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.comp_add]
#align homotopy.comp_left Homotopy.compLeft
@[simps!]
def comp {C₁ C₂ C₃ : HomologicalComplex V c} {f₁ g₁ : C₁ ⟶ C₂} {f₂ g₂ : C₂ ⟶ C₃}
(h₁ : Homotopy f₁ g₁) (h₂ : Homotopy f₂ g₂) : Homotopy (f₁ ≫ f₂) (g₁ ≫ g₂) :=
(h₁.compRight _).trans (h₂.compLeft _)
#align homotopy.comp Homotopy.comp
@[simps!]
def compRightId {f : C ⟶ C} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 C)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (f ≫ g) g :=
(h.compRight g).trans (ofEq <| id_comp _)
#align homotopy.comp_right_id Homotopy.compRightId
@[simps!]
def compLeftId {f : D ⟶ D} (h : Homotopy f (𝟙 D)) (g : C ⟶ D) : Homotopy (g ≫ f) g :=
(h.compLeft g).trans (ofEq <| comp_id _)
#align homotopy.comp_left_id Homotopy.compLeftId
def nullHomotopicMap (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) : C ⟶ D where
f i := dNext i hom + prevD i hom
comm' i j hij := by
have eq1 : prevD i hom ≫ D.d i j = 0 := by
simp only [prevD, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, assoc, d_comp_d, comp_zero]
have eq2 : C.d i j ≫ dNext j hom = 0 := by
simp only [dNext, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply, d_comp_d_assoc, zero_comp]
dsimp only
rw [dNext_eq hom hij, prevD_eq hom hij, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp, eq1, eq2,
add_zero, zero_add, assoc]
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap
def nullHomotopicMap' (h : ∀ i j, c.Rel j i → (C.X i ⟶ D.X j)) : C ⟶ D :=
nullHomotopicMap fun i j => dite (c.Rel j i) (h i j) fun _ => 0
#align homotopy.null_homotopic_map' Homotopy.nullHomotopicMap'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Homotopy.lean | 290 | 294 | theorem nullHomotopicMap_comp (hom : ∀ i j, C.X i ⟶ D.X j) (g : D ⟶ E) :
nullHomotopicMap hom ≫ g = nullHomotopicMap fun i j => hom i j ≫ g.f j := by |
ext n
dsimp [nullHomotopicMap, fromNext, toPrev, AddMonoidHom.mk'_apply]
simp only [Preadditive.add_comp, assoc, g.comm]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
#align_import measure_theory.card_measurable_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2b108e8e97ba393f22bf794989984ddcc1da89b"
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Cardinal Set
-- Porting note: fix universe below, not here
local notation "ω₁" => (WellOrder.α <| Quotient.out <| Cardinal.ord (aleph 1 : Cardinal))
namespace MeasurableSpace
def generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) : (ω₁ : Type u) → Set (Set α)
| i =>
let S := ⋃ j : Iio i, generateMeasurableRec s (j.1)
s ∪ {∅} ∪ compl '' S ∪ Set.range fun f : ℕ → S => ⋃ n, (f n).1
termination_by i => i
decreasing_by exact j.2
#align measurable_space.generate_measurable_rec MeasurableSpace.generateMeasurableRec
theorem self_subset_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : ω₁) :
s ⊆ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
apply_rules [subset_union_of_subset_left]
exact subset_rfl
#align measurable_space.self_subset_generate_measurable_rec MeasurableSpace.self_subset_generateMeasurableRec
theorem empty_mem_generateMeasurableRec (s : Set (Set α)) (i : ω₁) :
∅ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ (mem_singleton ∅)))
#align measurable_space.empty_mem_generate_measurable_rec MeasurableSpace.empty_mem_generateMeasurableRec
theorem compl_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i j : ω₁} (h : j < i) {t : Set α}
(ht : t ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) : tᶜ ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ ⟨t, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨j, h⟩, ht⟩, rfl⟩)
#align measurable_space.compl_mem_generate_measurable_rec MeasurableSpace.compl_mem_generateMeasurableRec
theorem iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec {s : Set (Set α)} {i : ω₁} {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf : ∀ n, ∃ j < i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s j) :
(⋃ n, f n) ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := by
unfold generateMeasurableRec
exact mem_union_right _ ⟨fun n => ⟨f n, let ⟨j, hj, hf⟩ := hf n; mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨j, hj⟩, hf⟩⟩, rfl⟩
#align measurable_space.Union_mem_generate_measurable_rec MeasurableSpace.iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec
theorem generateMeasurableRec_subset (s : Set (Set α)) {i j : ω₁} (h : i ≤ j) :
generateMeasurableRec s i ⊆ generateMeasurableRec s j := fun x hx => by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h with (rfl | h)
· exact hx
· convert iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec fun _ => ⟨i, h, hx⟩
exact (iUnion_const x).symm
#align measurable_space.generate_measurable_rec_subset MeasurableSpace.generateMeasurableRec_subset
theorem cardinal_generateMeasurableRec_le (s : Set (Set α)) (i : ω₁) :
#(generateMeasurableRec s i) ≤ max #s 2 ^ aleph0.{u} := by
apply (aleph 1).ord.out.wo.wf.induction i
intro i IH
have A := aleph0_le_aleph 1
have B : aleph 1 ≤ max #s 2 ^ aleph0.{u} :=
aleph_one_le_continuum.trans (power_le_power_right (le_max_right _ _))
have C : ℵ₀ ≤ max #s 2 ^ aleph0.{u} := A.trans B
have J : #(⋃ j : Iio i, generateMeasurableRec s j.1) ≤ max #s 2 ^ aleph0.{u} := by
refine (mk_iUnion_le _).trans ?_
have D : ⨆ j : Iio i, #(generateMeasurableRec s j) ≤ _ := ciSup_le' fun ⟨j, hj⟩ => IH j hj
apply (mul_le_mul' ((mk_subtype_le _).trans (aleph 1).mk_ord_out.le) D).trans
rw [mul_eq_max A C]
exact max_le B le_rfl
rw [generateMeasurableRec]
apply_rules [(mk_union_le _ _).trans, add_le_of_le C, mk_image_le.trans]
· exact (le_max_left _ _).trans (self_le_power _ one_lt_aleph0.le)
· rw [mk_singleton]
exact one_lt_aleph0.le.trans C
· apply mk_range_le.trans
simp only [mk_pi, prod_const, lift_uzero, mk_denumerable, lift_aleph0]
have := @power_le_power_right _ _ ℵ₀ J
rwa [← power_mul, aleph0_mul_aleph0] at this
#align measurable_space.cardinal_generate_measurable_rec_le MeasurableSpace.cardinal_generateMeasurableRec_le
theorem generateMeasurable_eq_rec (s : Set (Set α)) :
{ t | GenerateMeasurable s t } =
⋃ (i : (Quotient.out (aleph 1).ord).α), generateMeasurableRec s i := by
ext t; refine ⟨fun ht => ?_, fun ht => ?_⟩
· inhabit ω₁
induction' ht with u hu u _ IH f _ IH
· exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨default, self_subset_generateMeasurableRec s _ hu⟩
· exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨default, empty_mem_generateMeasurableRec s _⟩
· rcases mem_iUnion.1 IH with ⟨i, hi⟩
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := exists_gt i
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨j, compl_mem_generateMeasurableRec hj hi⟩
· have : ∀ n, ∃ i, f n ∈ generateMeasurableRec s i := fun n => by simpa using IH n
choose I hI using this
have : IsWellOrder (ω₁ : Type u) (· < ·) := isWellOrder_out_lt _
refine mem_iUnion.2
⟨Ordinal.enum (· < ·) (Ordinal.lsub fun n => Ordinal.typein.{u} (· < ·) (I n)) ?_,
iUnion_mem_generateMeasurableRec fun n => ⟨I n, ?_, hI n⟩⟩
· rw [Ordinal.type_lt]
refine Ordinal.lsub_lt_ord_lift ?_ fun i => Ordinal.typein_lt_self _
rw [mk_denumerable, lift_aleph0, isRegular_aleph_one.cof_eq]
exact aleph0_lt_aleph_one
· rw [← Ordinal.typein_lt_typein (· < ·), Ordinal.typein_enum]
apply Ordinal.lt_lsub fun n : ℕ => _
· rcases ht with ⟨t, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hx⟩
revert t
apply (aleph 1).ord.out.wo.wf.induction i
intro j H t ht
unfold generateMeasurableRec at ht
rcases ht with (((h | (rfl : t = ∅)) | ⟨u, ⟨-, ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩, hu⟩, rfl⟩) | ⟨f, rfl⟩)
· exact .basic t h
· exact .empty
· exact .compl u (H k hk u hu)
· refine .iUnion _ @fun n => ?_
obtain ⟨-, ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩, hf⟩ := (f n).prop
exact H k hk _ hf
#align measurable_space.generate_measurable_eq_rec MeasurableSpace.generateMeasurable_eq_rec
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/MeasurableSpace/Card.lean | 156 | 164 | theorem cardinal_generateMeasurable_le (s : Set (Set α)) :
#{ t | GenerateMeasurable s t } ≤ max #s 2 ^ aleph0.{u} := by |
rw [generateMeasurable_eq_rec]
apply (mk_iUnion_le _).trans
rw [(aleph 1).mk_ord_out]
refine le_trans (mul_le_mul' aleph_one_le_continuum
(ciSup_le' fun i => cardinal_generateMeasurableRec_le s i)) ?_
refine (mul_le_max_of_aleph0_le_left aleph0_le_continuum).trans (max_le ?_ le_rfl)
exact power_le_power_right (le_max_right _ _)
|
import Batteries.Data.Rat.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
namespace Rat
theorem ext : {p q : Rat} → p.num = q.num → p.den = q.den → p = q
| ⟨_,_,_,_⟩, ⟨_,_,_,_⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_den_one {r : Int} :
⟨r, 1, Nat.one_ne_zero, (Nat.coprime_one_right _)⟩ = (r : Rat) := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_num : (0 : Rat).num = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_den : (0 : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_num : (1 : Rat).num = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem one_den : (1 : Rat).den = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem maybeNormalize_eq {num den g} (den_nz reduced) :
maybeNormalize num den g den_nz reduced =
{ num := num.div g, den := den / g, den_nz, reduced } := by
unfold maybeNormalize; split
· subst g; simp
· rfl
theorem normalize.reduced' {num : Int} {den g : Nat} (den_nz : den ≠ 0)
(e : g = num.natAbs.gcd den) : (num / g).natAbs.Coprime (den / g) := by
rw [← Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd (e ▸ Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..))]
exact normalize.reduced den_nz e
theorem normalize_eq {num den} (den_nz) : normalize num den den_nz =
{ num := num / num.natAbs.gcd den
den := den / num.natAbs.gcd den
den_nz := normalize.den_nz den_nz rfl
reduced := normalize.reduced' den_nz rfl } := by
simp only [normalize, maybeNormalize_eq,
Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..))]
@[simp] theorem normalize_zero (nz) : normalize 0 d nz = 0 := by
simp [normalize, Int.zero_div, Int.natAbs_zero, Nat.div_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero nz)]; rfl
theorem mk_eq_normalize (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = normalize num den nz := by
simp [normalize_eq, c.gcd_eq_one]
theorem normalize_self (r : Rat) : normalize r.num r.den r.den_nz = r := (mk_eq_normalize ..).symm
theorem normalize_mul_left {a : Nat} (d0 : d ≠ 0) (a0 : a ≠ 0) :
normalize (↑a * n) (a * d) (Nat.mul_ne_zero a0 d0) = normalize n d d0 := by
simp [normalize_eq, mk'.injEq, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.gcd_mul_left,
Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero a0), Int.ofNat_mul,
Int.mul_ediv_mul_of_pos _ _ (Int.ofNat_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero a0)]
theorem normalize_mul_right {a : Nat} (d0 : d ≠ 0) (a0 : a ≠ 0) :
normalize (n * a) (d * a) (Nat.mul_ne_zero d0 a0) = normalize n d d0 := by
rw [← normalize_mul_left (d0 := d0) a0]; congr 1 <;> [apply Int.mul_comm; apply Nat.mul_comm]
theorem normalize_eq_iff (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
normalize n₁ d₁ z₁ = normalize n₂ d₂ z₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
constructor <;> intro h
· simp only [normalize_eq, mk'.injEq] at h
have' hn₁ := Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left n₁.natAbs d₁
have' hn₂ := Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left n₂.natAbs d₂
have' hd₁ := Int.ofNat_dvd.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_right n₁.natAbs d₁
have' hd₂ := Int.ofNat_dvd.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_right n₂.natAbs d₂
rw [← Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_trans hd₂ (Int.dvd_mul_left ..)),
Int.mul_ediv_assoc _ hd₂, ← Int.ofNat_ediv, ← h.2, Int.ofNat_ediv,
← Int.mul_ediv_assoc _ hd₁, Int.mul_ediv_assoc' _ hn₁,
Int.mul_right_comm, h.1, Int.ediv_mul_cancel hn₂]
· rw [← normalize_mul_right _ z₂, ← normalize_mul_left z₂ z₁, Int.mul_comm d₁, h]
theorem maybeNormalize_eq_normalize {num : Int} {den g : Nat} (den_nz reduced)
(hn : ↑g ∣ num) (hd : g ∣ den) :
maybeNormalize num den g den_nz reduced = normalize num den (mt (by simp [·]) den_nz) := by
simp only [maybeNormalize_eq, mk_eq_normalize, Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd hn]
have : g ≠ 0 := mt (by simp [·]) den_nz
rw [← normalize_mul_right _ this, Int.ediv_mul_cancel hn]
congr 1; exact Nat.div_mul_cancel hd
@[simp] theorem normalize_eq_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : normalize n d d0 = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
have' := normalize_eq_iff d0 Nat.one_ne_zero
rw [normalize_zero (d := 1)] at this; rw [this]; simp
theorem normalize_num_den' (num den nz) : ∃ d : Nat, d ≠ 0 ∧
num = (normalize num den nz).num * d ∧ den = (normalize num den nz).den * d := by
refine ⟨num.natAbs.gcd den, Nat.gcd_ne_zero_right nz, ?_⟩
simp [normalize_eq, Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.ofNat_dvd_left.2 <| Nat.gcd_dvd_left ..),
Nat.div_mul_cancel (Nat.gcd_dvd_right ..)]
theorem normalize_num_den (h : normalize n d z = ⟨n', d', z', c⟩) :
∃ m : Nat, m ≠ 0 ∧ n = n' * m ∧ d = d' * m := by
have := normalize_num_den' n d z; rwa [h] at this
theorem normalize_eq_mkRat {num den} (den_nz) : normalize num den den_nz = mkRat num den := by
simp [mkRat, den_nz]
theorem mkRat_num_den (z : d ≠ 0) (h : mkRat n d = ⟨n', d', z', c⟩) :
∃ m : Nat, m ≠ 0 ∧ n = n' * m ∧ d = d' * m :=
normalize_num_den ((normalize_eq_mkRat z).symm ▸ h)
theorem mkRat_def (n d) : mkRat n d = if d0 : d = 0 then 0 else normalize n d d0 := rfl
theorem mkRat_self (a : Rat) : mkRat a.num a.den = a := by
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat a.den_nz, normalize_self]
theorem mk_eq_mkRat (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = mkRat num den := by
simp [mk_eq_normalize, normalize_eq_mkRat]
@[simp] theorem zero_mkRat (n) : mkRat 0 n = 0 := by simp [mkRat_def]
@[simp] theorem mkRat_zero (n) : mkRat n 0 = 0 := by simp [mkRat_def]
theorem mkRat_eq_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : mkRat n d = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by simp [mkRat_def, d0]
theorem mkRat_ne_zero (d0 : d ≠ 0) : mkRat n d ≠ 0 ↔ n ≠ 0 := not_congr (mkRat_eq_zero d0)
theorem mkRat_mul_left {a : Nat} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : mkRat (↑a * n) (a * d) = mkRat n d := by
if d0 : d = 0 then simp [d0] else
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat d0, ← normalize_mul_left d0 a0, normalize_eq_mkRat]
theorem mkRat_mul_right {a : Nat} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : mkRat (n * a) (d * a) = mkRat n d := by
rw [← mkRat_mul_left (d := d) a0]; congr 1 <;> [apply Int.mul_comm; apply Nat.mul_comm]
theorem mkRat_eq_iff (z₁ : d₁ ≠ 0) (z₂ : d₂ ≠ 0) :
mkRat n₁ d₁ = mkRat n₂ d₂ ↔ n₁ * d₂ = n₂ * d₁ := by
rw [← normalize_eq_mkRat z₁, ← normalize_eq_mkRat z₂, normalize_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem divInt_ofNat (num den) : num /. (den : Nat) = mkRat num den := by
simp [divInt, normalize_eq_mkRat]
theorem mk_eq_divInt (num den nz c) : ⟨num, den, nz, c⟩ = num /. (den : Nat) := by
simp [mk_eq_mkRat]
theorem divInt_self (a : Rat) : a.num /. a.den = a := by rw [divInt_ofNat, mkRat_self]
@[simp] theorem zero_divInt (n) : 0 /. n = 0 := by cases n <;> simp [divInt]
@[simp] theorem divInt_zero (n) : n /. 0 = 0 := mkRat_zero n
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 144 | 152 | theorem neg_divInt_neg (num den) : -num /. -den = num /. den := by |
match den with
| Nat.succ n =>
simp only [divInt, Int.neg_ofNat_succ]
simp [normalize_eq_mkRat, Int.neg_neg]
| 0 => rfl
| Int.negSucc n =>
simp only [divInt, Int.neg_negSucc]
simp [normalize_eq_mkRat, Int.neg_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Commute
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Invertible
import Mathlib.Order.Synonym
#align_import algebra.field.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"05101c3df9d9cfe9430edc205860c79b6d660102"
open Function OrderDual Set
universe u
variable {α β K : Type*}
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid K] [HasDistribNeg K] {a b : K}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Field/Basic.lean | 96 | 98 | theorem one_div_neg_one_eq_neg_one : (1 : K) / -1 = -1 :=
have : -1 * -1 = (1 : K) := by | rw [neg_mul_neg, one_mul]
Eq.symm (eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right this)
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.join from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
attribute [simp] join
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem join_singleton (l : List α) : [l].join = l := by rw [join, join, append_nil]
#align list.join_singleton List.join_singleton
@[simp]
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] => iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| l :: L => by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
#align list.join_eq_nil List.join_eq_nil
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Join.lean | 38 | 41 | theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : List (List α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ := by |
induction L₁
· rfl
· simp [*]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
#align_import topology.urysohns_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Prop) where
protected C : Set X
protected U : Set X
protected P_C : P C
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P (closure v)
#align urysohns.CU Urysohns.CU
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Prop}
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C := c.P_C
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.left Urysohns.CU.left
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.right Urysohns.CU.right
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
#align urysohns.CU.subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.subset_right_C
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
#align urysohns.CU.approx Urysohns.CU.approx
theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_of_mem_C Urysohns.CU.approx_of_mem_C
theorem approx_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∉ c.U) : c.approx n x = 1 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· rw [← mem_compl_iff] at hx
exact indicator_of_mem hx _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [hx, fun hU => hx <| c.left_U_subset hU]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_of_nmem_U Urysohns.CU.approx_of_nmem_U
theorem approx_nonneg (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.approx n x := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
· simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv]
refine mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 zero_le_two) (add_nonneg ?_ ?_) <;> apply ihn
#align urysohns.CU.approx_nonneg Urysohns.CU.approx_nonneg
theorem approx_le_one (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : c.approx n x ≤ 1 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_apply_le' (fun _ => le_rfl) fun _ => zero_le_one
· simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv, smul_eq_mul, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
have := add_le_add (ihn (left c)) (ihn (right c))
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
norm_num at this
exact Iff.mpr (div_le_one zero_lt_two) this
#align urysohns.CU.approx_le_one Urysohns.CU.approx_le_one
theorem bddAbove_range_approx (c : CU P) (x : X) : BddAbove (range fun n => c.approx n x) :=
⟨1, fun _ ⟨n, hn⟩ => hn ▸ c.approx_le_one n x⟩
#align urysohns.CU.bdd_above_range_approx Urysohns.CU.bddAbove_range_approx
theorem approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C {c₁ c₂ : CU P} (h : c₁.U ⊆ c₂.C) (n₁ n₂ : ℕ) (x : X) :
c₂.approx n₂ x ≤ c₁.approx n₁ x := by
by_cases hx : x ∈ c₁.U
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x = 0 := approx_of_mem_C _ _ (h hx)
_ ≤ approx n₁ c₁ x := approx_nonneg _ _ _
· calc
approx n₂ c₂ x ≤ 1 := approx_le_one _ _ _
_ = approx n₁ c₁ x := (approx_of_nmem_U _ _ hx).symm
#align urysohns.CU.approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C Urysohns.CU.approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 210 | 218 | theorem approx_mem_Icc_right_left (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) :
c.approx n x ∈ Icc (c.right.approx n x) (c.left.approx n x) := by |
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact ⟨le_rfl, indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (compl_subset_compl.2 c.left_U_subset)
(fun _ => zero_le_one) _⟩
· simp only [approx, mem_Icc]
refine ⟨midpoint_le_midpoint ?_ (ihn _).1, midpoint_le_midpoint (ihn _).2 ?_⟩ <;>
apply approx_le_approx_of_U_sub_C
exacts [subset_closure, subset_closure]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 532 | 533 | theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by |
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.HahnSeries.Multiplication
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.PWO
#align_import ring_theory.hahn_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a484a7d0eade4e1268f4fb402859b6686037f965"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise Polynomial
noncomputable section
variable {Γ : Type*} {R : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
@[simps]
def toPowerSeries : HahnSeries ℕ R ≃+* PowerSeries R where
toFun f := PowerSeries.mk f.coeff
invFun f := ⟨fun n => PowerSeries.coeff R n f, (Nat.lt_wfRel.wf.isWF _).isPWO⟩
left_inv f := by
ext
simp
right_inv f := by
ext
simp
map_add' f g := by
ext
simp
map_mul' f g := by
ext n
simp only [PowerSeries.coeff_mul, PowerSeries.coeff_mk, mul_coeff, isPWO_support]
classical
refine (sum_filter_ne_zero _).symm.trans <| (sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ ↦ rfl).trans <|
sum_filter_ne_zero _
ext m
simp only [mem_antidiagonal, mem_addAntidiagonal, and_congr_left_iff, mem_filter,
mem_support]
rintro h
rw [and_iff_right (left_ne_zero_of_mul h), and_iff_right (right_ne_zero_of_mul h)]
#align hahn_series.to_power_series HahnSeries.toPowerSeries
theorem coeff_toPowerSeries {f : HahnSeries ℕ R} {n : ℕ} :
PowerSeries.coeff R n (toPowerSeries f) = f.coeff n :=
PowerSeries.coeff_mk _ _
#align hahn_series.coeff_to_power_series HahnSeries.coeff_toPowerSeries
theorem coeff_toPowerSeries_symm {f : PowerSeries R} {n : ℕ} :
(HahnSeries.toPowerSeries.symm f).coeff n = PowerSeries.coeff R n f :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.coeff_to_power_series_symm HahnSeries.coeff_toPowerSeries_symm
variable (Γ R) [StrictOrderedSemiring Γ]
def ofPowerSeries : PowerSeries R →+* HahnSeries Γ R :=
(HahnSeries.embDomainRingHom (Nat.castAddMonoidHom Γ) Nat.strictMono_cast.injective fun _ _ =>
Nat.cast_le).comp
(RingEquiv.toRingHom toPowerSeries.symm)
#align hahn_series.of_power_series HahnSeries.ofPowerSeries
variable {Γ} {R}
theorem ofPowerSeries_injective : Function.Injective (ofPowerSeries Γ R) :=
embDomain_injective.comp toPowerSeries.symm.injective
#align hahn_series.of_power_series_injective HahnSeries.ofPowerSeries_injective
theorem ofPowerSeries_apply (x : PowerSeries R) :
ofPowerSeries Γ R x =
HahnSeries.embDomain
⟨⟨((↑) : ℕ → Γ), Nat.strictMono_cast.injective⟩, by
simp only [Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
exact Nat.cast_le⟩
(toPowerSeries.symm x) :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.of_power_series_apply HahnSeries.ofPowerSeries_apply
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/PowerSeries.lean | 112 | 113 | theorem ofPowerSeries_apply_coeff (x : PowerSeries R) (n : ℕ) :
(ofPowerSeries Γ R x).coeff n = PowerSeries.coeff R n x := by | simp [ofPowerSeries_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e00d81bdcbf77c8188bbd18f5524ddc3ed8cac6"
namespace Nat
--@[pp_nodot] porting note: unknown attribute
def log (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b then log b (n / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : n / b < n := div_lt_self ((Nat.zero_lt_one.trans h.2).trans_le h.1) h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.log Nat.log
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 0 ↔ n < b ∨ b ≤ 1 := by
rw [log, dite_eq_right_iff]
simp only [Nat.add_eq_zero_iff, Nat.one_ne_zero, and_false, imp_false, not_and_or, not_le, not_lt]
#align nat.log_eq_zero_iff Nat.log_eq_zero_iff
theorem log_of_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : n < b) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl hb)
#align nat.log_of_lt Nat.log_of_lt
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inr hb)
#align nat.log_of_left_le_one Nat.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_pos_iff {b n : ℕ} : 0 < log b n ↔ b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b := by
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, log_eq_zero_iff, not_or, not_lt, not_le]
#align nat.log_pos_iff Nat.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hbn : b ≤ n) : 0 < log b n :=
log_pos_iff.2 ⟨hbn, hb⟩
#align nat.log_pos Nat.log_pos
theorem log_of_one_lt_of_le {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (hn : b ≤ n) : log b n = log b (n / b) + 1 := by
rw [log]
exact if_pos ⟨hn, h⟩
#align nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le Nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le
@[simp] lemma log_zero_left : ∀ n, log 0 n = 0 := log_of_left_le_one $ Nat.zero_le _
#align nat.log_zero_left Nat.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b 0 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (le_total 1 b)
#align nat.log_zero_right Nat.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ n, log 1 n = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align nat.log_one_left Nat.log_one_left
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b 1 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (lt_or_le _ _)
#align nat.log_one_right Nat.log_one_right
theorem pow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
b ^ x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ log b y := by
induction' y using Nat.strong_induction_on with y ih generalizing x
cases x with
| zero => dsimp; omega
| succ x =>
rw [log]; split_ifs with h
· have b_pos : 0 < b := lt_of_succ_lt hb
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih (y / b) (div_lt_self
(Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hy) hb) (Nat.div_pos h.1 b_pos).ne', le_div_iff_mul_le b_pos,
pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm]
· exact iff_of_false (fun hby => h ⟨(le_self_pow x.succ_ne_zero _).trans hby, hb⟩)
(not_succ_le_zero _)
#align nat.pow_le_iff_le_log Nat.pow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_pow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x ↔ log b y < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy)
#align nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt
theorem pow_le_of_le_log {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (h : x ≤ log b y) : b ^ x ≤ y := by
refine (le_or_lt b 1).elim (fun hb => ?_) fun hb => (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).2 h
rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.le_zero] at h
rwa [h, Nat.pow_zero, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.pow_le_of_le_log Nat.pow_le_of_le_log
theorem le_log_of_pow_le {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ x ≤ y) : x ≤ log b y := by
rcases ne_or_eq y 0 with (hy | rfl)
exacts [(pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).1 h, (h.not_lt (Nat.pow_pos (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb))).elim]
#align nat.le_log_of_pow_le Nat.le_log_of_pow_le
theorem pow_log_le_self (b : ℕ) {x : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
pow_le_of_le_log hx le_rfl
#align nat.pow_log_le_self Nat.pow_log_le_self
theorem log_lt_of_lt_pow {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x → log b y < x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_le_of_le_log hy)
#align nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow Nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow
theorem lt_pow_of_log_lt {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : log b y < x → y < b ^ x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (le_log_of_pow_le hb)
#align nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt
theorem lt_pow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x < b ^ (log b x).succ :=
lt_pow_of_log_lt hb (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self
theorem log_eq_iff {b m n : ℕ} (h : m ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) :
log b n = m ↔ b ^ m ≤ n ∧ n < b ^ (m + 1) := by
rcases em (1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) with (⟨hb, hn⟩ | hbn)
· rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← pow_le_iff_le_log, ← lt_pow_iff_log_lt, and_comm] <;>
assumption
have hm : m ≠ 0 := h.resolve_right hbn
rw [not_and_or, not_lt, Ne, not_not] at hbn
rcases hbn with (hb | rfl)
· obtain rfl | rfl := le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 hb
any_goals
simp only [ne_eq, zero_eq, reduceSucc, lt_self_iff_false, not_lt_zero, false_and, or_false]
at h
simp [h, eq_comm (a := 0), Nat.zero_pow (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 _)] <;> omega
· simp [@eq_comm _ 0, hm]
#align nat.log_eq_iff Nat.log_eq_iff
theorem log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow {b m n : ℕ} (h₁ : b ^ m ≤ n) (h₂ : n < b ^ (m + 1)) :
log b n = m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· rw [Nat.pow_one] at h₂
exact log_of_lt h₂
· exact (log_eq_iff (Or.inl hm)).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow Nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow
theorem log_pow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : log b (b ^ x) = x :=
log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow le_rfl (Nat.pow_lt_pow_right hb x.lt_succ_self)
#align nat.log_pow Nat.log_pow
theorem log_eq_one_iff' {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ b ≤ n ∧ n < b * b := by
rw [log_eq_iff (Or.inl Nat.one_ne_zero), Nat.pow_add, Nat.pow_one]
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff' Nat.log_eq_one_iff'
theorem log_eq_one_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ n < b * b ∧ 1 < b ∧ b ≤ n :=
log_eq_one_iff'.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, lt_mul_self_iff.1 (h.1.trans_lt h.2), h.1⟩, fun h => ⟨h.2.2, h.1⟩⟩
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff Nat.log_eq_one_iff
theorem log_mul_base {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : log b (n * b) = log b n + 1 := by
apply log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow <;> rw [pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm b]
exacts [Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (pow_log_le_self _ hn),
(Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb)).2 (lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _)]
#align nat.log_mul_base Nat.log_mul_base
theorem pow_log_le_add_one (b : ℕ) : ∀ x, b ^ log b x ≤ x + 1
| 0 => by rw [log_zero_right, Nat.pow_zero]
| x + 1 => (pow_log_le_self b x.succ_ne_zero).trans (x + 1).le_succ
#align nat.pow_log_le_add_one Nat.pow_log_le_add_one
theorem log_monotone {b : ℕ} : Monotone (log b) := by
refine monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => ?_
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
· exact le_log_of_pow_le hb (pow_log_le_add_one _ _)
#align nat.log_monotone Nat.log_monotone
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : log b n ≤ log b m :=
log_monotone h
#align nat.log_mono_right Nat.log_mono_right
@[mono]
theorem log_anti_left {b c n : ℕ} (hc : 1 < c) (hb : c ≤ b) : log b n ≤ log c n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · rw [log_zero_right, log_zero_right]
apply le_log_of_pow_le hc
calc
c ^ log b n ≤ b ^ log b n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hb _
_ ≤ n := pow_log_le_self _ hn
#align nat.log_anti_left Nat.log_anti_left
theorem log_antitone_left {n : ℕ} : AntitoneOn (fun b => log b n) (Set.Ioi 1) := fun _ hc _ _ hb =>
log_anti_left (Set.mem_Iio.1 hc) hb
#align nat.log_antitone_left Nat.log_antitone_left
@[simp]
theorem log_div_base (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b) = log b n - 1 := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.zero_sub]
cases' lt_or_le n b with h h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, log_of_lt h, log_zero_right]
rw [log_of_one_lt_of_le hb h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align nat.log_div_base Nat.log_div_base
@[simp]
theorem log_div_mul_self (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b * b) = log b n := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb]
cases' lt_or_le n b with h h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, Nat.zero_mul, log_zero_right, log_of_lt h]
rw [log_mul_base hb (Nat.div_pos h (by omega)).ne', log_div_base,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_iff.2 <| log_pos hb h)]
#align nat.log_div_mul_self Nat.log_div_mul_self
theorem add_pred_div_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : (n + b - 1) / b < n := by
rw [div_lt_iff_lt_mul (by omega), ← succ_le_iff, ← pred_eq_sub_one,
succ_pred_eq_of_pos (by omega)]
exact Nat.add_le_mul hn hb
-- Porting note: Was private in mathlib 3
-- #align nat.add_pred_div_lt Nat.add_pred_div_lt
--@[pp_nodot]
def clog (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n then clog b ((n + b - 1) / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : (n + b - 1) / b < n := add_pred_div_lt h.1 h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.clog Nat.clog
theorem clog_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : clog b n = 0 := by
rw [clog, dif_neg fun h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n => h.1.not_le hb]
#align nat.clog_of_left_le_one Nat.clog_of_left_le_one
theorem clog_of_right_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ 1) (b : ℕ) : clog b n = 0 := by
rw [clog, dif_neg fun h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n => h.2.not_le hn]
#align nat.clog_of_right_le_one Nat.clog_of_right_le_one
@[simp] lemma clog_zero_left (n : ℕ) : clog 0 n = 0 := clog_of_left_le_one (Nat.zero_le _) _
#align nat.clog_zero_left Nat.clog_zero_left
@[simp] lemma clog_zero_right (b : ℕ) : clog b 0 = 0 := clog_of_right_le_one (Nat.zero_le _) _
#align nat.clog_zero_right Nat.clog_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_left (n : ℕ) : clog 1 n = 0 :=
clog_of_left_le_one le_rfl _
#align nat.clog_one_left Nat.clog_one_left
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_right (b : ℕ) : clog b 1 = 0 :=
clog_of_right_le_one le_rfl _
#align nat.clog_one_right Nat.clog_one_right
theorem clog_of_two_le {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
clog b n = clog b ((n + b - 1) / b) + 1 := by rw [clog, dif_pos (⟨hb, hn⟩ : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n)]
#align nat.clog_of_two_le Nat.clog_of_two_le
theorem clog_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : 0 < clog b n := by
rw [clog_of_two_le hb hn]
exact zero_lt_succ _
#align nat.clog_pos Nat.clog_pos
theorem clog_eq_one {b n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) (h : n ≤ b) : clog b n = 1 := by
rw [clog_of_two_le (hn.trans h) hn, clog_of_right_le_one]
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul] <;> omega
#align nat.clog_eq_one Nat.clog_eq_one
theorem le_pow_iff_clog_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} : x ≤ b ^ y ↔ clog b x ≤ y := by
induction' x using Nat.strong_induction_on with x ih generalizing y
cases y
· rw [Nat.pow_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => (clog_of_right_le_one h b).le, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← not_lt]
contrapose!
exact clog_pos hb
have b_pos : 0 < b := zero_lt_of_lt hb
rw [clog]; split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih ((x + b - 1) / b) (add_pred_div_lt hb h.2),
Nat.div_le_iff_le_mul_add_pred b_pos, Nat.mul_comm b, ← Nat.pow_succ,
Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.succ_le_of_lt b_pos), Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
· exact iff_of_true ((not_lt.1 (not_and.1 h hb)).trans <| succ_le_of_lt <| Nat.pow_pos b_pos)
(zero_le _)
#align nat.le_pow_iff_clog_le Nat.le_pow_iff_clog_le
theorem pow_lt_iff_lt_clog {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} : b ^ y < x ↔ y < clog b x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_pow_iff_clog_le hb)
#align nat.pow_lt_iff_lt_clog Nat.pow_lt_iff_lt_clog
theorem clog_pow (b x : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) : clog b (b ^ x) = x :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z ↦ by rw [← le_pow_iff_clog_le hb, Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right hb]
#align nat.clog_pow Nat.clog_pow
theorem pow_pred_clog_lt_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℕ} (hx : 1 < x) :
b ^ (clog b x).pred < x := by
rw [← not_le, le_pow_iff_clog_le hb, not_le]
exact pred_lt (clog_pos hb hx).ne'
#align nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self Nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self
theorem le_pow_clog {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x ≤ b ^ clog b x :=
(le_pow_iff_clog_le hb).2 le_rfl
#align nat.le_pow_clog Nat.le_pow_clog
@[mono]
theorem clog_mono_right (b : ℕ) {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : clog b n ≤ clog b m := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [clog_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
· rw [← le_pow_iff_clog_le hb]
exact h.trans (le_pow_clog hb _)
#align nat.clog_mono_right Nat.clog_mono_right
@[mono]
theorem clog_anti_left {b c n : ℕ} (hc : 1 < c) (hb : c ≤ b) : clog b n ≤ clog c n := by
rw [← le_pow_iff_clog_le (lt_of_lt_of_le hc hb)]
calc
n ≤ c ^ clog c n := le_pow_clog hc _
_ ≤ b ^ clog c n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hb _
#align nat.clog_anti_left Nat.clog_anti_left
theorem clog_monotone (b : ℕ) : Monotone (clog b) := fun _ _ => clog_mono_right _
#align nat.clog_monotone Nat.clog_monotone
theorem clog_antitone_left {n : ℕ} : AntitoneOn (fun b : ℕ => clog b n) (Set.Ioi 1) :=
fun _ hc _ _ hb => clog_anti_left (Set.mem_Iio.1 hc) hb
#align nat.clog_antitone_left Nat.clog_antitone_left
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Log.lean | 349 | 359 | theorem log_le_clog (b n : ℕ) : log b n ≤ clog b n := by |
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt b 1
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [log_zero_right]
exact zero_le _
| succ n =>
exact (Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right hb).1
((pow_log_le_self b n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| le_pow_clog hb _)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 54 | 56 | theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by |
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
continuity
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
#align_import analysis.normed_space.add_torsor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"837f72de63ad6cd96519cde5f1ffd5ed8d280ad0"
noncomputable section
open NNReal Topology
open Filter
variable {α V P W Q : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [PseudoMetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [MetricSpace Q] [NormedAddTorsor W Q]
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V] [NormedSpace 𝕜 W]
open AffineMap
theorem AffineSubspace.isClosed_direction_iff (s : AffineSubspace 𝕜 Q) :
IsClosed (s.direction : Set W) ↔ IsClosed (s : Set Q) := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩); · simp [isClosed_singleton]
rw [← (IsometryEquiv.vaddConst x).toHomeomorph.symm.isClosed_image,
AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx]
rfl
#align affine_subspace.is_closed_direction_iff AffineSubspace.isClosed_direction_iff
@[simp]
theorem dist_center_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist p₁ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
simp [homothety_def, norm_smul, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, dist_comm]
#align dist_center_homothety dist_center_homothety
@[simp]
theorem nndist_center_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₁ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_center_homothety _ _ _
#align nndist_center_homothety nndist_center_homothety
@[simp]
theorem dist_homothety_center (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₁ = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_center_homothety]
#align dist_homothety_center dist_homothety_center
@[simp]
theorem nndist_homothety_center (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₁ = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_homothety_center _ _ _
#align nndist_homothety_center nndist_homothety_center
@[simp]
theorem dist_lineMap_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c₁ c₂ : 𝕜) :
dist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₁) (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₂) = dist c₁ c₂ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [dist_comm p₁ p₂]
simp only [lineMap_apply, dist_eq_norm_vsub, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right,
← sub_smul, norm_smul, vsub_eq_sub]
#align dist_line_map_line_map dist_lineMap_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem nndist_lineMap_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c₁ c₂ : 𝕜) :
nndist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₁) (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₂) = nndist c₁ c₂ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_lineMap_lineMap _ _ _ _
#align nndist_line_map_line_map nndist_lineMap_lineMap
theorem lipschitzWith_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) : LipschitzWith (nndist p₁ p₂) (lineMap p₁ p₂ : 𝕜 → P) :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun c₁ c₂ =>
((dist_lineMap_lineMap p₁ p₂ c₁ c₂).trans (mul_comm _ _)).le
#align lipschitz_with_line_map lipschitzWith_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem dist_lineMap_left (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) : dist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₁ = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
simpa only [lineMap_apply_zero, dist_zero_right] using dist_lineMap_lineMap p₁ p₂ c 0
#align dist_line_map_left dist_lineMap_left
@[simp]
theorem nndist_lineMap_left (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₁ = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_lineMap_left _ _ _
#align nndist_line_map_left nndist_lineMap_left
@[simp]
theorem dist_left_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) : dist p₁ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_lineMap_left _ _ _)
#align dist_left_line_map dist_left_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem nndist_left_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₁ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_left_lineMap _ _ _
#align nndist_left_line_map nndist_left_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem dist_lineMap_right (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
simpa only [lineMap_apply_one, dist_eq_norm'] using dist_lineMap_lineMap p₁ p₂ c 1
#align dist_line_map_right dist_lineMap_right
@[simp]
theorem nndist_lineMap_right (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_lineMap_right _ _ _
#align nndist_line_map_right nndist_lineMap_right
@[simp]
theorem dist_right_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) : dist p₂ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_lineMap_right _ _ _)
#align dist_right_line_map dist_right_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem nndist_right_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₂ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_right_lineMap _ _ _
#align nndist_right_line_map nndist_right_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem dist_homothety_self (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [homothety_eq_lineMap, dist_lineMap_right]
#align dist_homothety_self dist_homothety_self
@[simp]
theorem nndist_homothety_self (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_homothety_self _ _ _
#align nndist_homothety_self nndist_homothety_self
@[simp]
theorem dist_self_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist p₂ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_homothety_self]
#align dist_self_homothety dist_self_homothety
@[simp]
theorem nndist_self_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₂ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_self_homothety _ _ _
#align nndist_self_homothety nndist_self_homothety
@[simp] theorem dist_pointReflection_left (p q : P) :
dist (Equiv.pointReflection p q) p = dist p q := by
simp [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Equiv.pointReflection_vsub_left (G := V)]
@[simp] theorem dist_left_pointReflection (p q : P) :
dist p (Equiv.pointReflection p q) = dist p q :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_pointReflection_left _ _)
variable (𝕜) in
theorem dist_pointReflection_right (p q : P) :
dist (Equiv.pointReflection p q) q = ‖(2 : 𝕜)‖ * dist p q := by
simp [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Equiv.pointReflection_vsub_right (G := V),
nsmul_eq_smul_cast 𝕜, norm_smul]
variable (𝕜) in
theorem dist_right_pointReflection (p q : P) :
dist q (Equiv.pointReflection p q) = ‖(2 : 𝕜)‖ * dist p q :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_pointReflection_right 𝕜 _ _)
theorem antilipschitzWith_lineMap {p₁ p₂ : Q} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
AntilipschitzWith (nndist p₁ p₂)⁻¹ (lineMap p₁ p₂ : 𝕜 → Q) :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun c₁ c₂ => by
rw [dist_lineMap_lineMap, NNReal.coe_inv, ← dist_nndist, mul_left_comm,
inv_mul_cancel (dist_ne_zero.2 h), mul_one]
#align antilipschitz_with_line_map antilipschitzWith_lineMap
variable (𝕜)
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/AddTorsor.lean | 246 | 257 | theorem eventually_homothety_mem_of_mem_interior (x : Q) {s : Set Q} {y : Q} (hy : y ∈ interior s) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (1 : 𝕜), homothety x δ y ∈ s := by |
rw [(NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : 𝕜)).eventually_iff]
rcases eq_or_ne y x with h | h
· use 1
simp [h.symm, interior_subset hy]
have hxy : 0 < ‖y -ᵥ x‖ := by rwa [norm_pos_iff, vsub_ne_zero]
obtain ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := mem_interior.mp hy
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hyε⟩ := Metric.isOpen_iff.mp hu₂ y hu₃
refine ⟨ε / ‖y -ᵥ x‖, div_pos hε hxy, fun δ (hδ : ‖δ - 1‖ < ε / ‖y -ᵥ x‖) => hu₁ (hyε ?_)⟩
rw [lt_div_iff hxy, ← norm_smul, sub_smul, one_smul] at hδ
rwa [homothety_apply, Metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_vsub W, vadd_vsub_eq_sub_vsub]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α F F' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
open scoped Classical
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → F'} {s : Set α}
noncomputable irreducible_def condexp (m : MeasurableSpace α) {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) (f : α → F') : α → F' :=
if hm : m ≤ m0 then
if h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) ∧ Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else (@aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ m m0 μ hm h.1 _).mk
(@condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hm μ h.1 f)
else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.condexp MeasureTheory.condexp
-- We define notation `μ[f|m]` for the conditional expectation of `f` with respect to `m`.
scoped notation μ "[" f "|" m "]" => MeasureTheory.condexp m μ f
theorem condexp_of_not_le (hm_not : ¬m ≤ m0) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_neg hm_not]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_le MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_le
theorem condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) (hμm_not : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)) :
μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_pos hm, dif_neg]; push_neg; exact fun h => absurd h hμm_not
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
μ[f|m] =
if Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1.mk (condexpL1 hm μ f)
else 0 := by
rw [condexp, dif_pos hm]
simp only [hμm, Ne, true_and_iff]
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [dif_pos hf, if_pos hf]
· rw [dif_neg hf, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm, if_pos hfi, if_pos hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_const (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : F') [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
μ[fun _ : α => c|m] = fun _ => c :=
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _) (integrable_const c)
#align measure_theory.condexp_const MeasureTheory.condexp_const
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (f : α → F') :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1 hm μ f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [if_pos hfi]
by_cases hfm : StronglyMeasurable[m] f
· rw [if_pos hfm]
exact (condexpL1_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' hfm)
hfi).symm
· rw [if_neg hfm]
exact (AEStronglyMeasurable'.ae_eq_mk aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1).symm
rw [if_neg hfi, condexpL1_undef hfi]
exact (coeFn_zero _ _ _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1 MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1CLM F' hm μ (hf.toL1 f) := by
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [condexpL1_eq hf]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1_clm MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM
theorem condexp_undef (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_undef MeasureTheory.condexp_undef
@[simp]
theorem condexp_zero : μ[(0 : α → F')|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _) (integrable_zero _ _ _)
#align measure_theory.condexp_zero MeasureTheory.condexp_zero
theorem stronglyMeasurable_condexp : StronglyMeasurable[m] (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
split_ifs with hfi hfm
· exact hfm
· exact AEStronglyMeasurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk _
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_condexp MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_condexp
theorem condexp_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans
(Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (by rw [condexpL1_congr_ae hm h])
(condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm g).symm)
#align measure_theory.condexp_congr_ae MeasureTheory.condexp_congr_ae
theorem condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] f := by
refine ((condexp_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk).trans ?_).trans hf.ae_eq_mk.symm
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk
((integrable_congr hf.ae_eq_mk).mp hfi)]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable'
theorem integrable_condexp : Integrable (μ[f|m]) μ := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (integrable_condexpL1 f).congr (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).symm
#align measure_theory.integrable_condexp MeasureTheory.integrable_condexp
theorem setIntegral_condexp (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) : ∫ x in s, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) ((condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
exact setIntegral_condexpL1 hf hs
#align measure_theory.set_integral_condexp MeasureTheory.setIntegral_condexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")] alias set_integral_condexp := setIntegral_condexp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Basic.lean | 229 | 233 | theorem integral_condexp (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by |
suffices ∫ x in Set.univ, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in Set.univ, f x ∂μ by
simp_rw [integral_univ] at this; exact this
exact setIntegral_condexp hm hf (@MeasurableSet.univ _ m)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
#align_import algebra.group.ext from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e574b1a4e891376b0ef974b926da39e05da12a06"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem Monoid.ext {M : Type u} ⦃m₁ m₂ : Monoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ := by
have : m₁.toMulOneClass = m₂.toMulOneClass := MulOneClass.ext h_mul
have h₁ : m₁.one = m₂.one := congr_arg (·.one) this
let f : @MonoidHom M M m₁.toMulOneClass m₂.toMulOneClass :=
@MonoidHom.mk _ _ (_) _ (@OneHom.mk _ _ (_) _ id h₁)
(fun x y => congr_fun (congr_fun h_mul x) y)
have : m₁.npow = m₂.npow := by
ext n x
exact @MonoidHom.map_pow M M m₁ m₂ f x n
rcases m₁ with @⟨@⟨⟨_⟩⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
rcases m₂ with @⟨@⟨⟨_⟩⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
congr
#align monoid.ext Monoid.ext
#align add_monoid.ext AddMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@CommMonoid.toMonoid M) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ h
congr
#align comm_monoid.to_monoid_injective CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective
#align add_comm_monoid.to_add_monoid_injective AddCommMonoid.toAddMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem CommMonoid.ext {M : Type*} ⦃m₁ m₂ : CommMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) : m₁ = m₂ :=
CommMonoid.toMonoid_injective <| Monoid.ext h_mul
#align comm_monoid.ext CommMonoid.ext
#align add_comm_monoid.ext AddCommMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid M) := by
rintro @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ h
congr <;> injection h
#align left_cancel_monoid.to_monoid_injective LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective
#align add_left_cancel_monoid.to_add_monoid_injective AddLeftCancelMonoid.toAddMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem LeftCancelMonoid.ext {M : Type u} ⦃m₁ m₂ : LeftCancelMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ :=
LeftCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective <| Monoid.ext h_mul
#align left_cancel_monoid.ext LeftCancelMonoid.ext
#align add_left_cancel_monoid.ext AddLeftCancelMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid M) := by
rintro @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ @⟨@⟨⟩⟩ h
congr <;> injection h
#align right_cancel_monoid.to_monoid_injective RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective
#align add_right_cancel_monoid.to_add_monoid_injective AddRightCancelMonoid.toAddMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem RightCancelMonoid.ext {M : Type u} ⦃m₁ m₂ : RightCancelMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ :=
RightCancelMonoid.toMonoid_injective <| Monoid.ext h_mul
#align right_cancel_monoid.ext RightCancelMonoid.ext
#align add_right_cancel_monoid.ext AddRightCancelMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem CancelMonoid.toLeftCancelMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@CancelMonoid.toLeftCancelMonoid M) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ h
congr
#align cancel_monoid.to_left_cancel_monoid_injective CancelMonoid.toLeftCancelMonoid_injective
#align add_cancel_monoid.to_left_cancel_add_monoid_injective AddCancelMonoid.toAddLeftCancelMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem CancelMonoid.ext {M : Type*} ⦃m₁ m₂ : CancelMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ :=
CancelMonoid.toLeftCancelMonoid_injective <| LeftCancelMonoid.ext h_mul
#align cancel_monoid.ext CancelMonoid.ext
#align add_cancel_monoid.ext AddCancelMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem CancelCommMonoid.toCommMonoid_injective {M : Type u} :
Function.Injective (@CancelCommMonoid.toCommMonoid M) := by
rintro @⟨@⟨@⟨⟩⟩⟩ @⟨@⟨@⟨⟩⟩⟩ h
congr <;> {
injection h with h'
injection h' }
#align cancel_comm_monoid.to_comm_monoid_injective CancelCommMonoid.toCommMonoid_injective
#align add_cancel_comm_monoid.to_add_comm_monoid_injective AddCancelCommMonoid.toAddCommMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem CancelCommMonoid.ext {M : Type*} ⦃m₁ m₂ : CancelCommMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M)) :
m₁ = m₂ :=
CancelCommMonoid.toCommMonoid_injective <| CommMonoid.ext h_mul
#align cancel_comm_monoid.ext CancelCommMonoid.ext
#align add_cancel_comm_monoid.ext AddCancelCommMonoid.ext
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem DivInvMonoid.ext {M : Type*} ⦃m₁ m₂ : DivInvMonoid M⦄
(h_mul : (letI := m₁; HMul.hMul : M → M → M) = (letI := m₂; HMul.hMul : M → M → M))
(h_inv : (letI := m₁; Inv.inv : M → M) = (letI := m₂; Inv.inv : M → M)) : m₁ = m₂ := by
have h_mon := Monoid.ext h_mul
have h₁ : m₁.one = m₂.one := congr_arg (·.one) h_mon
let f : @MonoidHom M M m₁.toMulOneClass m₂.toMulOneClass :=
@MonoidHom.mk _ _ (_) _ (@OneHom.mk _ _ (_) _ id h₁)
(fun x y => congr_fun (congr_fun h_mul x) y)
have : m₁.npow = m₂.npow := congr_arg (·.npow) h_mon
have : m₁.zpow = m₂.zpow := by
ext m x
exact @MonoidHom.map_zpow' M M m₁ m₂ f (congr_fun h_inv) x m
have : m₁.div = m₂.div := by
ext a b
exact @map_div' _ _
(F := @MonoidHom _ _ (_) _) _ (id _) _
(@MonoidHom.instMonoidHomClass _ _ (_) _) f (congr_fun h_inv) a b
rcases m₁ with @⟨_, ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
rcases m₂ with @⟨_, ⟨_⟩, ⟨_⟩⟩
congr
#align div_inv_monoid.ext DivInvMonoid.ext
#align sub_neg_monoid.ext SubNegMonoid.ext
@[to_additive]
lemma Group.toDivInvMonoid_injective {G : Type*} : Injective (@Group.toDivInvMonoid G) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩; rfl
#align group.to_div_inv_monoid_injective Group.toDivInvMonoid_injective
#align add_group.to_sub_neg_add_monoid_injective AddGroup.toSubNegAddMonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Ext.lean | 167 | 175 | theorem Group.ext {G : Type*} ⦃g₁ g₂ : Group G⦄ (h_mul : g₁.mul = g₂.mul) : g₁ = g₂ := by |
have h₁ : g₁.one = g₂.one := congr_arg (·.one) (Monoid.ext h_mul)
let f : @MonoidHom G G g₁.toMulOneClass g₂.toMulOneClass :=
@MonoidHom.mk _ _ (_) _ (@OneHom.mk _ _ (_) _ id h₁)
(fun x y => congr_fun (congr_fun h_mul x) y)
exact
Group.toDivInvMonoid_injective
(DivInvMonoid.ext h_mul
(funext <| @MonoidHom.map_inv G G g₁ g₂.toDivisionMonoid f))
|
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Basic
#align_import order.ord_continuous from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
open Function OrderDual Set
def LeftOrdContinuous [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃x⦄, IsLUB s x → IsLUB (f '' s) (f x)
#align left_ord_continuous LeftOrdContinuous
def RightOrdContinuous [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α → β) :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄ ⦃x⦄, IsGLB s x → IsGLB (f '' s) (f x)
#align right_ord_continuous RightOrdContinuous
namespace LeftOrdContinuous
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α] [CompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
theorem map_sSup' (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (s : Set α) : f (sSup s) = sSup (f '' s) :=
(hf <| isLUB_sSup s).sSup_eq.symm
#align left_ord_continuous.map_Sup' LeftOrdContinuous.map_sSup'
| Mathlib/Order/OrdContinuous.lean | 131 | 132 | theorem map_sSup (hf : LeftOrdContinuous f) (s : Set α) : f (sSup s) = ⨆ x ∈ s, f x := by |
rw [hf.map_sSup', sSup_image]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Central
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
#align_import data.nat.choose.factorization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc9db541168768af03fe228703e758e649afdbfc"
namespace Nat
variable {p n k : ℕ}
theorem factorization_choose_le_log : (choose n k).factorization p ≤ log p n := by
by_cases h : (choose n k).factorization p = 0
· simp [h]
have hp : p.Prime := Not.imp_symm (choose n k).factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime h
have hkn : k ≤ n := by
refine le_of_not_lt fun hnk => h ?_
simp [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk]
rw [factorization_def _ hp, @padicValNat_def _ ⟨hp⟩ _ (choose_pos hkn)]
simp only [hp.multiplicity_choose hkn (lt_add_one _), PartENat.get_natCast]
exact (Finset.card_filter_le _ _).trans (le_of_eq (Nat.card_Ico _ _))
#align nat.factorization_choose_le_log Nat.factorization_choose_le_log
theorem pow_factorization_choose_le (hn : 0 < n) : p ^ (choose n k).factorization p ≤ n :=
pow_le_of_le_log hn.ne' factorization_choose_le_log
#align nat.pow_factorization_choose_le Nat.pow_factorization_choose_le
theorem factorization_choose_le_one (p_large : n < p ^ 2) : (choose n k).factorization p ≤ 1 := by
apply factorization_choose_le_log.trans
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn0); · simp
exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 (log_lt_of_lt_pow hn0 p_large)
#align nat.factorization_choose_le_one Nat.factorization_choose_le_one
theorem factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul (hp' : p ≠ 2) (hk : p ≤ k) (hk' : p ≤ n - k)
(hn : n < 3 * p) : (choose n k).factorization p = 0 := by
cases' em' p.Prime with hp hp
· exact factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime (choose n k) hp
cases' lt_or_le n k with hnk hkn
· simp [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk]
rw [factorization_def _ hp, @padicValNat_def _ ⟨hp⟩ _ (choose_pos hkn)]
simp only [hp.multiplicity_choose hkn (lt_add_one _), PartENat.get_natCast, Finset.card_eq_zero,
Finset.filter_eq_empty_iff, not_le]
intro i hi
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Finset.mem_Ico.mp hi).1 with (rfl | hi)
· rw [pow_one, ← add_lt_add_iff_left (2 * p), ← succ_mul, two_mul, add_add_add_comm]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt
(add_le_add
(add_le_add_right (le_mul_of_one_le_right' ((one_le_div_iff hp.pos).mpr hk)) (k % p))
(add_le_add_right (le_mul_of_one_le_right' ((one_le_div_iff hp.pos).mpr hk'))
((n - k) % p)))
(by rwa [div_add_mod, div_add_mod, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hkn])
· replace hn : n < p ^ i := by
have : 3 ≤ p := lt_of_le_of_ne hp.two_le hp'.symm
calc
n < 3 * p := hn
_ ≤ p * p := mul_le_mul_right' this p
_ = p ^ 2 := (sq p).symm
_ ≤ p ^ i := pow_le_pow_right hp.one_lt.le hi
rwa [mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hkn hn), mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt tsub_le_self hn),
add_tsub_cancel_of_le hkn]
#align nat.factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul Nat.factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul
theorem factorization_centralBinom_of_two_mul_self_lt_three_mul (n_big : 2 < n) (p_le_n : p ≤ n)
(big : 2 * n < 3 * p) : (centralBinom n).factorization p = 0 := by
refine factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul ?_ p_le_n (p_le_n.trans ?_) big
· omega
· rw [two_mul, add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align nat.factorization_central_binom_of_two_mul_self_lt_three_mul Nat.factorization_centralBinom_of_two_mul_self_lt_three_mul
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Factorization.lean | 100 | 103 | theorem factorization_factorial_eq_zero_of_lt (h : n < p) : (factorial n).factorization p = 0 := by |
induction' n with n hn; · simp
rw [factorial_succ, factorization_mul n.succ_ne_zero n.factorial_ne_zero, Finsupp.coe_add,
Pi.add_apply, hn (lt_of_succ_lt h), add_zero, factorization_eq_zero_of_lt h]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
#align_import information_theory.hamming from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"17ef379e997badd73e5eabb4d38f11919ab3c4b3"
section HammingDistNorm
open Finset Function
variable {α ι : Type*} {β : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (β i)]
variable {γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, DecidableEq (γ i)]
def hammingDist (x y : ∀ i, β i) : ℕ :=
(univ.filter fun i => x i ≠ y i).card
#align hamming_dist hammingDist
@[simp]
theorem hammingDist_self (x : ∀ i, β i) : hammingDist x x = 0 := by
rw [hammingDist, card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
exact fun _ _ H => H rfl
#align hamming_dist_self hammingDist_self
theorem hammingDist_nonneg {x y : ∀ i, β i} : 0 ≤ hammingDist x y :=
zero_le _
#align hamming_dist_nonneg hammingDist_nonneg
theorem hammingDist_comm (x y : ∀ i, β i) : hammingDist x y = hammingDist y x := by
simp_rw [hammingDist, ne_comm]
#align hamming_dist_comm hammingDist_comm
theorem hammingDist_triangle (x y z : ∀ i, β i) :
hammingDist x z ≤ hammingDist x y + hammingDist y z := by
classical
unfold hammingDist
refine le_trans (card_mono ?_) (card_union_le _ _)
rw [← filter_or]
exact monotone_filter_right _ fun i h ↦ (h.ne_or_ne _).imp_right Ne.symm
#align hamming_dist_triangle hammingDist_triangle
theorem hammingDist_triangle_left (x y z : ∀ i, β i) :
hammingDist x y ≤ hammingDist z x + hammingDist z y := by
rw [hammingDist_comm z]
exact hammingDist_triangle _ _ _
#align hamming_dist_triangle_left hammingDist_triangle_left
theorem hammingDist_triangle_right (x y z : ∀ i, β i) :
hammingDist x y ≤ hammingDist x z + hammingDist y z := by
rw [hammingDist_comm y]
exact hammingDist_triangle _ _ _
#align hamming_dist_triangle_right hammingDist_triangle_right
| Mathlib/InformationTheory/Hamming.lean | 85 | 87 | theorem swap_hammingDist : swap (@hammingDist _ β _ _) = hammingDist := by |
funext x y
exact hammingDist_comm _ _
|
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
namespace Tactic
namespace NormNum
theorem int_gcd_helper' {d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} (a b : ℤ) (h₁ : (d : ℤ) ∣ x) (h₂ : (d : ℤ) ∣ y)
(h₃ : x * a + y * b = d) : Int.gcd x y = d := by
refine Nat.dvd_antisymm ?_ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 (Int.dvd_gcd h₁ h₂))
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← h₃]
apply dvd_add
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left.mul_right _
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right.mul_right _
theorem nat_gcd_helper_dvd_left (x y : ℕ) (h : y % x = 0) : Nat.gcd x y = x :=
Nat.gcd_eq_left (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h)
theorem nat_gcd_helper_dvd_right (x y : ℕ) (h : x % y = 0) : Nat.gcd x y = y :=
Nat.gcd_eq_right (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero h)
theorem nat_gcd_helper_2 (d x y a b : ℕ) (hu : x % d = 0) (hv : y % d = 0)
(h : x * a = y * b + d) : Nat.gcd x y = d := by
rw [← Int.gcd_natCast_natCast]
apply int_gcd_helper' a (-b)
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.mpr (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hu))
(Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.mpr (Nat.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero hv))
rw [mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
exact mod_cast h
theorem nat_gcd_helper_1 (d x y a b : ℕ) (hu : x % d = 0) (hv : y % d = 0)
(h : y * b = x * a + d) : Nat.gcd x y = d :=
(Nat.gcd_comm _ _).trans <| nat_gcd_helper_2 _ _ _ _ _ hv hu h
theorem nat_gcd_helper_1' (x y a b : ℕ) (h : y * b = x * a + 1) :
Nat.gcd x y = 1 :=
nat_gcd_helper_1 1 _ _ _ _ (Nat.mod_one _) (Nat.mod_one _) h
theorem nat_gcd_helper_2' (x y a b : ℕ) (h : x * a = y * b + 1) :
Nat.gcd x y = 1 :=
nat_gcd_helper_2 1 _ _ _ _ (Nat.mod_one _) (Nat.mod_one _) h
theorem nat_lcm_helper (x y d m : ℕ) (hd : Nat.gcd x y = d)
(d0 : Nat.beq d 0 = false)
(dm : x * y = d * m) : Nat.lcm x y = m :=
mul_right_injective₀ (Nat.ne_of_beq_eq_false d0) <| by
dsimp only -- Porting note: the `dsimp only` was not necessary in Lean3.
rw [← dm, ← hd, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm]
theorem int_gcd_helper {x y : ℤ} {x' y' d : ℕ}
(hx : x.natAbs = x') (hy : y.natAbs = y') (h : Nat.gcd x' y' = d) :
Int.gcd x y = d := by subst_vars; rw [Int.gcd_def]
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/GCD.lean | 68 | 70 | theorem int_lcm_helper {x y : ℤ} {x' y' d : ℕ}
(hx : x.natAbs = x') (hy : y.natAbs = y') (h : Nat.lcm x' y' = d) :
Int.lcm x y = d := by | subst_vars; rw [Int.lcm_def]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.int.gcd from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a1a73351de8dd6c8d3d32b569c8e434b03ca47"
namespace Nat
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
#align nat.xgcd_aux Nat.xgcdAux
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
#align nat.xgcd_zero_left Nat.xgcd_zero_left
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
#align nat.xgcd_aux_rec Nat.xgcdAux_rec
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
#align nat.xgcd Nat.xgcd
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
#align nat.gcd_a Nat.gcdA
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
#align nat.gcd_b Nat.gcdB
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
#align nat.gcd_a_zero_left Nat.gcdA_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
#align nat.gcd_b_zero_left Nat.gcdB_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
#align nat.gcd_a_zero_right Nat.gcdA_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
#align nat.gcd_b_zero_right Nat.gcdB_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
#align nat.xgcd_aux_fst Nat.xgcdAux_fst
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
#align nat.xgcd_aux_val Nat.xgcdAux_val
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
#align nat.xgcd_val Nat.xgcd_val
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align nat.xgcd_aux_P Nat.xgcdAux_P
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 139 | 141 | theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by |
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
|
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
#align_import group_theory.exponent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
open scoped Classical
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
@[to_additive
"A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such\n
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def ExponentExists :=
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
#align monoid.exponent_exists Monoid.ExponentExists
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists AddMonoid.ExponentExists
@[to_additive
"The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that\n
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : ExponentExists G then Nat.find h else 0
#align monoid.exponent Monoid.exponent
#align add_monoid.exponent AddMonoid.exponent
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoid.exponent_additive :
AddMonoid.exponent (Additive G) = exponent G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exponent_multiplicative {G : Type*} [AddMonoid G] :
exponent (Multiplicative G) = AddMonoid.exponent G := rfl
open MulOpposite in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.MulOpposite.exponent : exponent (MulOpposite G) = exponent G := by
simp only [Monoid.exponent, ExponentExists]
congr!
all_goals exact ⟨(op_injective <| · <| op ·), (unop_injective <| · <| unop ·)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.isOfFinOrder (h : ExponentExists G) {g : G} : IsOfFinOrder g :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by peel 2 h; exact this g
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.orderOf_pos (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : 0 < orderOf g :=
h.isOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_ne_zero : exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ ExponentExists G := by
rw [exponent]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ]
--if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
· tauto
#align monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero Monoid.exponent_ne_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero AddMonoid.exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_ne_zero⟩ := exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-27"))]
theorem exponentExists_iff_ne_zero : ExponentExists G ↔ exponent G ≠ 0 := exponent_ne_zero.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos : 0 < exponent G ↔ ExponentExists G :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_pos⟩ := exponent_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.not_right
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : orderOf g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun h ↦ h.orderOf_pos g |>.ne' hg
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero
@[to_additive "The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that
`n • g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff_forall : exponent G = 0 ↔ ∀ n > 0, ∃ g : G, g ^ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [exponent_eq_zero_iff, ExponentExists]
push_neg
rfl
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 := by
by_cases h : ExponentExists G
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h]
exact (Nat.find_spec h).2 g
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero]
#align monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one
#align add_monoid.exponent_nsmul_eq_zero AddMonoid.exponent_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_mod_exponent {n : ℕ} (g : G) : g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G) :=
calc
g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G + exponent G * (n / exponent G)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = g ^ (n % exponent G) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_exponent_eq_one]
#align monoid.pow_eq_mod_exponent Monoid.pow_eq_mod_exponent
#align add_monoid.nsmul_eq_mod_exponent AddMonoid.nsmul_eq_mod_exponent
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos_of_exists (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
0 < exponent G :=
ExponentExists.exponent_pos ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
#align monoid.exponent_pos_of_exists Monoid.exponent_pos_of_exists
#align add_monoid.exponent_pos_of_exists AddMonoid.exponent_pos_of_exists
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min' (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) : exponent G ≤ n := by
rw [exponent, dif_pos]
· apply Nat.find_min'
exact ⟨hpos, hG⟩
· exact ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
#align monoid.exponent_min' Monoid.exponent_min'
#align add_monoid.exponent_min' AddMonoid.exponent_min'
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Exponent.lean | 185 | 188 | theorem exponent_min (m : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < m) (hm : m < exponent G) : ∃ g : G, g ^ m ≠ 1 := by |
by_contra! h
have hcon : exponent G ≤ m := exponent_min' m hpos h
omega
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/RingDivision.lean | 245 | 256 | theorem irreducible_of_monic (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f = 1 ∨ g = 1 := by |
refine
⟨fun h f g hf hg hp => (h.2 f g hp.symm).imp hf.eq_one_of_isUnit hg.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h =>
⟨hp1 ∘ hp.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun f g hfg =>
(h (g * C f.leadingCoeff) (f * C g.leadingCoeff) ?_ ?_ ?_).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one f _)
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one g _)⟩⟩
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, mul_comm, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← C_mul, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, hp.leadingCoeff, C_1, mul_one,
mul_comm, ← hfg]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Bounded
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.chain_of_divisors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
variable {M : Type*} [CancelCommMonoidWithZero M]
theorem Associates.isAtom_iff {p : Associates M} (h₁ : p ≠ 0) : IsAtom p ↔ Irreducible p :=
⟨fun hp =>
⟨by simpa only [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one] using hp.1, fun a b h =>
(hp.le_iff.mp ⟨_, h⟩).casesOn (fun ha => Or.inl (a.isUnit_iff_eq_one.mpr ha)) fun ha =>
Or.inr
(show IsUnit b by
rw [ha] at h
apply isUnit_of_associated_mul (show Associated (p * b) p by conv_rhs => rw [h]) h₁)⟩,
fun hp =>
⟨by simpa only [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, Associates.bot_eq_one] using hp.1,
fun b ⟨⟨a, hab⟩, hb⟩ =>
(hp.isUnit_or_isUnit hab).casesOn
(fun hb => show b = ⊥ by rwa [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, ← Associates.bot_eq_one] at hb)
fun ha =>
absurd
(show p ∣ b from
⟨(ha.unit⁻¹ : Units _), by rw [hab, mul_assoc, IsUnit.mul_val_inv ha, mul_one]⟩)
hb⟩⟩
#align associates.is_atom_iff Associates.isAtom_iff
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid multiplicity Irreducible Associates
namespace DivisorChain
theorem exists_chain_of_prime_pow {p : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : Prime p) :
∃ c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M,
c 1 = p ∧ StrictMono c ∧ ∀ {r : Associates M}, r ≤ p ^ n ↔ ∃ i, r = c i := by
refine ⟨fun i => p ^ (i : ℕ), ?_, fun n m h => ?_, @fun y => ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· dsimp only
rw [Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, pow_one]
exact Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr hn)
· exact Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.mp
⟨pow_ne_zero n hp.ne_zero, p ^ (m - n : ℕ),
not_isUnit_of_not_isUnit_dvd hp.not_unit (dvd_pow dvd_rfl (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h).ne'),
(pow_mul_pow_sub p h.le).symm⟩
· obtain ⟨i, i_le, hi⟩ := (dvd_prime_pow hp n).1 h
rw [associated_iff_eq] at hi
exact ⟨⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le i_le⟩, hi⟩
· rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨p ^ (n - i : ℕ), (pow_mul_pow_sub p (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp i.2)).symm⟩
#align divisor_chain.exists_chain_of_prime_pow DivisorChain.exists_chain_of_prime_pow
theorem element_of_chain_not_isUnit_of_index_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (i_pos : i ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c) : ¬IsUnit (c i) :=
DvdNotUnit.not_unit
(Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.2
(h₁ <| show (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < i from Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr i_pos))
#align divisor_chain.element_of_chain_not_is_unit_of_index_ne_zero DivisorChain.element_of_chain_not_isUnit_of_index_ne_zero
theorem first_of_chain_isUnit {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ} {c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M}
(h₁ : StrictMono c) (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) : IsUnit (c 0) := by
obtain ⟨i, hr⟩ := h₂.mp Associates.one_le
rw [Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one, ← Associates.le_one_iff, hr]
exact h₁.monotone (Fin.zero_le i)
#align divisor_chain.first_of_chain_is_unit DivisorChain.first_of_chain_isUnit
theorem second_of_chain_is_irreducible {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c) (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i)
(hq : q ≠ 0) : Irreducible (c 1) := by
cases' n with n; · contradiction
refine (Associates.isAtom_iff (ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hq (h₂.2 ⟨1, rfl⟩))).mp ⟨?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩
· exact ne_bot_of_gt (h₁ (show (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < 1 from Fin.one_pos))
obtain ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, rfl⟩ := h₂.1 (hb.le.trans (h₂.2 ⟨1, rfl⟩))
cases i
· exact (Associates.isUnit_iff_eq_one _).mp (first_of_chain_isUnit h₁ @h₂)
· simpa [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val] using h₁.lt_iff_lt.mp hb
#align divisor_chain.second_of_chain_is_irreducible DivisorChain.second_of_chain_is_irreducible
theorem eq_second_of_chain_of_prime_dvd {p q r : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c)
(h₂ : ∀ {r : Associates M}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) (hp : Prime p) (hr : r ∣ q) (hp' : p ∣ r) :
p = c 1 := by
cases' n with n
· contradiction
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := h₂.1 (dvd_trans hp' hr)
refine congr_arg c (eq_of_ge_of_not_gt ?_ fun hi => ?_)
· rw [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.succ_le_iff, ← Fin.val_zero' (n.succ + 1), ←
Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rintro rfl
exact hp.not_unit (first_of_chain_isUnit h₁ @h₂)
obtain rfl | ⟨j, rfl⟩ := i.eq_zero_or_eq_succ
· cases hi
refine
not_irreducible_of_not_unit_dvdNotUnit
(DvdNotUnit.not_unit
(Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.2 (h₁ (show (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < j from ?_))))
?_ hp.irreducible
· simpa [Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val] using hi
· refine Associates.dvdNotUnit_iff_lt.2 (h₁ ?_)
simpa only [Fin.coe_eq_castSucc] using Fin.lt_succ
#align divisor_chain.eq_second_of_chain_of_prime_dvd DivisorChain.eq_second_of_chain_of_prime_dvd
theorem card_subset_divisors_le_length_of_chain {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ}
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) {m : Finset (Associates M)}
(hm : ∀ r, r ∈ m → r ≤ q) : m.card ≤ n + 1 := by
classical
have mem_image : ∀ r : Associates M, r ≤ q → r ∈ Finset.univ.image c := by
intro r hr
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h₂.1 hr
exact Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, hi.symm⟩
rw [← Finset.card_fin (n + 1)]
exact (Finset.card_le_card fun x hx => mem_image x <| hm x hx).trans Finset.card_image_le
#align divisor_chain.card_subset_divisors_le_length_of_chain DivisorChain.card_subset_divisors_le_length_of_chain
variable [UniqueFactorizationMonoid M]
theorem element_of_chain_eq_pow_second_of_chain {q r : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c) (h₂ : ∀ {r}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i)
(hr : r ∣ q) (hq : q ≠ 0) : ∃ i : Fin (n + 1), r = c 1 ^ (i : ℕ) := by
classical
let i := Multiset.card (normalizedFactors r)
have hi : normalizedFactors r = Multiset.replicate i (c 1) := by
apply Multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem
intro b hb
refine
eq_second_of_chain_of_prime_dvd hn h₁ (@fun r' => h₂) (prime_of_normalized_factor b hb) hr
(dvd_of_mem_normalizedFactors hb)
have H : r = c 1 ^ i := by
have := UniqueFactorizationMonoid.normalizedFactors_prod (ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hq hr)
rw [associated_iff_eq, hi, Multiset.prod_replicate] at this
rw [this]
refine ⟨⟨i, ?_⟩, H⟩
have : (Finset.univ.image fun m : Fin (i + 1) => c 1 ^ (m : ℕ)).card = i + 1 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Finset.card_fin (i + 1)]
cases n
· contradiction
rw [Finset.card_image_iff]
refine Set.injOn_of_injective (fun m m' h => Fin.ext ?_)
refine
pow_injective_of_not_unit (element_of_chain_not_isUnit_of_index_ne_zero (by simp) h₁) ?_ h
exact Irreducible.ne_zero (second_of_chain_is_irreducible hn h₁ (@h₂) hq)
suffices H' : ∀ r ∈ Finset.univ.image fun m : Fin (i + 1) => c 1 ^ (m : ℕ), r ≤ q by
simp only [← Nat.succ_le_iff, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← this]
apply card_subset_divisors_le_length_of_chain (@h₂) H'
simp only [Finset.mem_image]
rintro r ⟨a, _, rfl⟩
refine dvd_trans ?_ hr
use c 1 ^ (i - (a : ℕ))
rw [pow_mul_pow_sub (c 1)]
· exact H
· exact Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp a.2
#align divisor_chain.element_of_chain_eq_pow_second_of_chain DivisorChain.element_of_chain_eq_pow_second_of_chain
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ChainOfDivisors.lean | 186 | 210 | theorem eq_pow_second_of_chain_of_has_chain {q : Associates M} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
{c : Fin (n + 1) → Associates M} (h₁ : StrictMono c)
(h₂ : ∀ {r : Associates M}, r ≤ q ↔ ∃ i, r = c i) (hq : q ≠ 0) : q = c 1 ^ n := by |
classical
obtain ⟨i, hi'⟩ := element_of_chain_eq_pow_second_of_chain hn h₁ (@fun r => h₂) (dvd_refl q) hq
convert hi'
refine (Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 i.prop).antisymm' (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ?_)
calc
n + 1 = (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin (n + 1))).card := (Finset.card_fin _).symm
_ = (Finset.univ.image c).card := (Finset.card_image_iff.mpr h₁.injective.injOn).symm
_ ≤ (Finset.univ.image fun m : Fin (i + 1) => c 1 ^ (m : ℕ)).card :=
(Finset.card_le_card ?_)
_ ≤ (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin (i + 1))).card := Finset.card_image_le
_ = i + 1 := Finset.card_fin _
intro r hr
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hr
have := h₂.2 ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [hi'] at this
have h := (dvd_prime_pow (show Prime (c 1) from ?_) i).1 this
· rcases h with ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩
refine Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨u, Finset.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
rw [associated_iff_eq] at hu'
rw [Fin.val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt_succ_of_le hu), hu']
· rw [← irreducible_iff_prime]
exact second_of_chain_is_irreducible hn h₁ (@h₂) hq
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.FiniteMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
#align_import measure_theory.measure.probability_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory
open Set
open Filter
open BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section ProbabilityMeasure
def ProbabilityMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsProbabilityMeasure μ }
#align measure_theory.probability_measure MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure
namespace ProbabilityMeasure
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
instance [Inhabited Ω] : Inhabited (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :=
⟨⟨Measure.dirac default, Measure.dirac.isProbabilityMeasure⟩⟩
-- Porting note: as with other subtype synonyms (e.g., `ℝ≥0`), we need a new function for the
-- coercion instead of relying on `Subtype.val`.
@[coe]
def toMeasure : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
instance : Coe (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) where
coe := toMeasure
instance (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : IsProbabilityMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) :=
μ.prop
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) : toMeasure ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_to_measure (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.val_eq_to_measure MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.val_eq_to_measure
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ProbabilityMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.coe_injective MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toMeasure_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective $ Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.coe_fn_eq_to_nnreal_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.coeFn_def
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := ProbabilityMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := ProbabilityMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_univ (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ν univ = 1 :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal ν.prop.measure_univ
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.coe_fn_univ MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.coeFn_univ
theorem coeFn_univ_ne_zero (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ν univ ≠ 0 := by
simp only [coeFn_univ, Ne, one_ne_zero, not_false_iff]
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.coe_fn_univ_ne_zero MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.coeFn_univ_ne_zero
def toFiniteMeasure (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω :=
⟨μ, inferInstance⟩
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.to_finite_measure MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toFiniteMeasure
@[simp] lemma coeFn_toFiniteMeasure (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) : ⇑μ.toFiniteMeasure = μ := rfl
lemma toFiniteMeasure_apply (μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
μ.toFiniteMeasure s = μ s := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_toMeasure (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
(ν.toFiniteMeasure : Measure Ω) = (ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.coe_comp_to_finite_measure_eq_coe MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.toMeasure_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_toMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_coeFn (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) :
(ν.toFiniteMeasure : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.coe_fn_comp_to_finite_measure_eq_coe_fn MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.coeFn_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_coeFn
@[simp]
theorem toFiniteMeasure_apply_eq_apply (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
ν.toFiniteMeasure s = ν s := rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/ProbabilityMeasure.lean | 193 | 196 | theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : ProbabilityMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s := by |
rw [← coeFn_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_coeFn, FiniteMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
toMeasure_comp_toFiniteMeasure_eq_toMeasure]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
#align_import analysis.normed_space.int from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5cc2dfdd3e92f340411acea4427d701dc7ed26f8"
namespace Int
theorem nnnorm_coe_units (e : ℤˣ) : ‖(e : ℤ)‖₊ = 1 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := units_eq_one_or e <;>
simp only [Units.coe_neg_one, Units.val_one, nnnorm_neg, nnnorm_one]
#align int.nnnorm_coe_units Int.nnnorm_coe_units
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Int.lean | 29 | 30 | theorem norm_coe_units (e : ℤˣ) : ‖(e : ℤ)‖ = 1 := by |
rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_coe_units, NNReal.coe_one]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
#align real.log Real.log
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
#align real.log_of_ne_zero Real.log_of_ne_zero
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.log_of_pos Real.log_of_pos
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align real.exp_log_eq_abs Real.exp_log_eq_abs
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.exp_log Real.exp_log
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.exp_log_of_neg Real.exp_log_of_neg
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
#align real.le_exp_log Real.le_exp_log
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
#align real.log_exp Real.log_exp
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.surj_on_log Real.surjOn_log
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.log_surjective Real.log_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
#align real.range_log Real.range_log
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align real.log_zero Real.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
#align real.log_one Real.log_one
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
#align real.log_abs Real.log_abs
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.log_neg_eq_log Real.log_neg_eq_log
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.sinh_log Real.sinh_log
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.cosh_log Real.cosh_log
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
#align real.surj_on_log' Real.surjOn_log'
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
#align real.log_mul Real.log_mul
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
#align real.log_div Real.log_div
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
#align real.log_inv Real.log_inv
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
#align real.log_le_log Real.log_le_log_iff
@[gcongr]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
#align real.log_lt_log Real.log_lt_log
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
#align real.log_lt_log_iff Real.log_lt_log_iff
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_iff_le_exp Real.log_le_iff_le_exp
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 165 | 165 | theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by | rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.DiscreteQuotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Cofiltered
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Konig
#align_import topology.category.Profinite.cofiltered_limit from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
namespace Profinite
open scoped Classical
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
-- This was a global instance prior to #13170. We may experiment with removing it.
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
universe u v
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [IsCofiltered J] {F : J ⥤ Profinite.{max u v}} (C : Cone F)
theorem exists_isClopen_of_cofiltered {U : Set C.pt} (hC : IsLimit C) (hU : IsClopen U) :
∃ (j : J) (V : Set (F.obj j)), IsClopen V ∧ U = C.π.app j ⁻¹' V := by
-- First, we have the topological basis of the cofiltered limit obtained by pulling back
-- clopen sets from the factors in the limit. By continuity, all such sets are again clopen.
have hB := TopCat.isTopologicalBasis_cofiltered_limit.{u, v} (F ⋙ Profinite.toTopCat)
(Profinite.toTopCat.mapCone C) (isLimitOfPreserves _ hC) (fun j => {W | IsClopen W}) ?_
(fun i => isClopen_univ) (fun i U1 U2 hU1 hU2 => hU1.inter hU2) ?_
rotate_left
· intro i
change TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis {W : Set (F.obj i) | IsClopen W}
apply isTopologicalBasis_isClopen
· rintro i j f V (hV : IsClopen _)
exact ⟨hV.1.preimage ((F ⋙ toTopCat).map f).continuous,
hV.2.preimage ((F ⋙ toTopCat).map f).continuous⟩
-- Porting note: `<;> continuity` fails
-- Using this, since `U` is open, we can write `U` as a union of clopen sets all of which
-- are preimages of clopens from the factors in the limit.
obtain ⟨S, hS, h⟩ := hB.open_eq_sUnion hU.2
clear hB
let j : S → J := fun s => (hS s.2).choose
let V : ∀ s : S, Set (F.obj (j s)) := fun s => (hS s.2).choose_spec.choose
have hV : ∀ s : S, IsClopen (V s) ∧ s.1 = C.π.app (j s) ⁻¹' V s := fun s =>
(hS s.2).choose_spec.choose_spec
-- Since `U` is also closed, hence compact, it is covered by finitely many of the
-- clopens constructed in the previous step.
have hUo : ∀ (i : ↑S), IsOpen ((fun s ↦ (forget Profinite).map (C.π.app (j s)) ⁻¹' V s) i) := by
intro s
exact (hV s).1.2.preimage (C.π.app (j s)).continuous
have hsU : U ⊆ ⋃ (i : ↑S), (fun s ↦ (forget Profinite).map (C.π.app (j s)) ⁻¹' V s) i := by
dsimp only
rw [h]
rintro x ⟨T, hT, hx⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨T, hT⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
dsimp only [forget_map_eq_coe]
rwa [← (hV ⟨T, hT⟩).2]
have := hU.1.isCompact.elim_finite_subcover (fun s : S => C.π.app (j s) ⁻¹' V s) hUo hsU
-- Porting note: same remark as after `hB`
-- We thus obtain a finite set `G : Finset J` and a clopen set of `F.obj j` for each
-- `j ∈ G` such that `U` is the union of the preimages of these clopen sets.
obtain ⟨G, hG⟩ := this
-- Since `J` is cofiltered, we can find a single `j0` dominating all the `j ∈ G`.
-- Pulling back all of the sets from the previous step to `F.obj j0` and taking a union,
-- we obtain a clopen set in `F.obj j0` which works.
obtain ⟨j0, hj0⟩ := IsCofiltered.inf_objs_exists (G.image j)
let f : ∀ s ∈ G, j0 ⟶ j s := fun s hs => (hj0 (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩)).some
let W : S → Set (F.obj j0) := fun s => if hs : s ∈ G then F.map (f s hs) ⁻¹' V s else Set.univ
-- Conclude, using the `j0` and the clopen set of `F.obj j0` obtained above.
refine ⟨j0, ⋃ (s : S) (_ : s ∈ G), W s, ?_, ?_⟩
· apply isClopen_biUnion_finset
intro s hs
dsimp [W]
rw [dif_pos hs]
exact ⟨(hV s).1.1.preimage (F.map _).continuous, (hV s).1.2.preimage (F.map _).continuous⟩
· ext x
constructor
· intro hx
simp_rw [W, Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.mem_iUnion]
obtain ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, _, ⟨hs, rfl⟩, hh⟩ := hG hx
refine ⟨s, hs, ?_⟩
rwa [dif_pos hs, ← Set.preimage_comp, ← Profinite.coe_comp, ← Functor.map_comp, C.w]
· intro hx
simp_rw [W, Set.preimage_iUnion, Set.mem_iUnion] at hx
obtain ⟨s, hs, hx⟩ := hx
rw [h]
refine ⟨s.1, s.2, ?_⟩
rw [(hV s).2]
rwa [dif_pos hs, ← Set.preimage_comp, ← Profinite.coe_comp, ← Functor.map_comp, C.w] at hx
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Profinite.exists_clopen_of_cofiltered Profinite.exists_isClopen_of_cofiltered
theorem exists_locallyConstant_fin_two (hC : IsLimit C) (f : LocallyConstant C.pt (Fin 2)) :
∃ (j : J) (g : LocallyConstant (F.obj j) (Fin 2)), f = g.comap (C.π.app _) := by
let U := f ⁻¹' {0}
have hU : IsClopen U := f.isLocallyConstant.isClopen_fiber _
obtain ⟨j, V, hV, h⟩ := exists_isClopen_of_cofiltered C hC hU
use j, LocallyConstant.ofIsClopen hV
apply LocallyConstant.locallyConstant_eq_of_fiber_zero_eq
simp only [Fin.isValue, Functor.const_obj_obj, LocallyConstant.coe_comap, Set.preimage_comp,
LocallyConstant.ofIsClopen_fiber_zero]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Profinite.exists_locally_constant_fin_two Profinite.exists_locallyConstant_fin_two
theorem exists_locallyConstant_finite_aux {α : Type*} [Finite α] (hC : IsLimit C)
(f : LocallyConstant C.pt α) : ∃ (j : J) (g : LocallyConstant (F.obj j) (α → Fin 2)),
(f.map fun a b => if a = b then (0 : Fin 2) else 1) = g.comap (C.π.app _) := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
let ι : α → α → Fin 2 := fun x y => if x = y then 0 else 1
let ff := (f.map ι).flip
have hff := fun a : α => exists_locallyConstant_fin_two _ hC (ff a)
choose j g h using hff
let G : Finset J := Finset.univ.image j
obtain ⟨j0, hj0⟩ := IsCofiltered.inf_objs_exists G
have hj : ∀ a, j a ∈ (Finset.univ.image j : Finset J) := by
intro a
simp only [Finset.mem_image, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, exists_apply_eq_apply]
let fs : ∀ a : α, j0 ⟶ j a := fun a => (hj0 (hj a)).some
let gg : α → LocallyConstant (F.obj j0) (Fin 2) := fun a => (g a).comap (F.map (fs _))
let ggg := LocallyConstant.unflip gg
refine ⟨j0, ggg, ?_⟩
have : f.map ι = LocallyConstant.unflip (f.map ι).flip := by simp
rw [this]; clear this
have :
LocallyConstant.comap (C.π.app j0) ggg =
LocallyConstant.unflip (LocallyConstant.comap (C.π.app j0) ggg).flip := by
simp
rw [this]; clear this
congr 1
ext1 a
change ff a = _
rw [h]
dsimp
ext1 x
change _ = (g a) ((C.π.app j0 ≫ F.map (fs a)) x)
rw [C.w]; rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Profinite.exists_locally_constant_finite_aux Profinite.exists_locallyConstant_finite_aux
theorem exists_locallyConstant_finite_nonempty {α : Type*} [Finite α] [Nonempty α]
(hC : IsLimit C) (f : LocallyConstant C.pt α) :
∃ (j : J) (g : LocallyConstant (F.obj j) α), f = g.comap (C.π.app _) := by
inhabit α
obtain ⟨j, gg, h⟩ := exists_locallyConstant_finite_aux _ hC f
let ι : α → α → Fin 2 := fun a b => if a = b then 0 else 1
let σ : (α → Fin 2) → α := fun f => if h : ∃ a : α, ι a = f then h.choose else default
refine ⟨j, gg.map σ, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, LocallyConstant.coe_comap, LocallyConstant.map_apply,
Function.comp_apply]
dsimp [σ]
have h1 : ι (f x) = gg (C.π.app j x) := by
change f.map (fun a b => if a = b then (0 : Fin 2) else 1) x = _
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [h]
rfl
have h2 : ∃ a : α, ι a = gg (C.π.app j x) := ⟨f x, h1⟩
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [dif_pos h2]
apply_fun ι
· rw [h2.choose_spec]
exact h1
· intro a b hh
have hhh := congr_fun hh a
dsimp [ι] at hhh
rw [if_pos rfl] at hhh
split_ifs at hhh with hh1
· exact hh1.symm
· exact False.elim (bot_ne_top hhh)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Profinite.exists_locally_constant_finite_nonempty Profinite.exists_locallyConstant_finite_nonempty
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/CofilteredLimit.lean | 200 | 235 | theorem exists_locallyConstant {α : Type*} (hC : IsLimit C) (f : LocallyConstant C.pt α) :
∃ (j : J) (g : LocallyConstant (F.obj j) α), f = g.comap (C.π.app _) := by |
let S := f.discreteQuotient
let ff : S → α := f.lift
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty S
· suffices ∃ j, IsEmpty (F.obj j) by
refine this.imp fun j hj => ?_
refine ⟨⟨hj.elim, fun A => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· suffices (fun a ↦ IsEmpty.elim hj a) ⁻¹' A = ∅ by
rw [this]
exact isOpen_empty
exact @Set.eq_empty_of_isEmpty _ hj _
· ext x
exact hj.elim' (C.π.app j x)
simp only [← not_nonempty_iff, ← not_forall]
intro h
haveI : ∀ j : J, Nonempty ((F ⋙ Profinite.toTopCat).obj j) := h
haveI : ∀ j : J, T2Space ((F ⋙ Profinite.toTopCat).obj j) := fun j =>
(inferInstance : T2Space (F.obj j))
haveI : ∀ j : J, CompactSpace ((F ⋙ Profinite.toTopCat).obj j) := fun j =>
(inferInstance : CompactSpace (F.obj j))
have cond := TopCat.nonempty_limitCone_of_compact_t2_cofiltered_system.{u}
(F ⋙ Profinite.toTopCat)
suffices Nonempty C.pt from IsEmpty.false (S.proj this.some)
let D := Profinite.toTopCat.mapCone C
have hD : IsLimit D := isLimitOfPreserves Profinite.toTopCat hC
have CD := (hD.conePointUniqueUpToIso (TopCat.limitConeIsLimit.{v, max u v} _)).inv
exact cond.map CD
· let f' : LocallyConstant C.pt S := ⟨S.proj, S.proj_isLocallyConstant⟩
obtain ⟨j, g', hj⟩ := exists_locallyConstant_finite_nonempty _ hC f'
refine ⟨j, ⟨ff ∘ g', g'.isLocallyConstant.comp _⟩, ?_⟩
ext1 t
apply_fun fun e => e t at hj
dsimp at hj ⊢
rw [← hj]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import data.real.irrational from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e7aaccf9b0182576cabdde36cf1b5ad3585b70d"
open Rat Real multiplicity
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
#align irrational Irrational
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 32 | 34 | theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by |
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_neg_I Complex.arg_neg_I
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (abs.ne_zero h)]
#align complex.tan_arg Complex.tan_arg
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_nonneg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [abs.nonneg]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
#align complex.arg_eq_zero_iff Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
#align complex.arg_lt_pi_iff Complex.arg_lt_pi_iff
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_neg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
#align complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
if_pos hx
#align complex.arg_of_re_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
#align complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero Complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align complex.arg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
#align complex.arg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, abs_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
#align complex.arg_conj Complex.arg_conj
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
#align complex.arg_inv Complex.arg_inv
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma abs_eq_one_iff' : abs x = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [abs_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using abs_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
_root_.abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
#align complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
#align complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff Complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff]
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
#align complex.arg_conj_coe_angle Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
#align complex.arg_inv_coe_angle Complex.arg_inv_coe_angle
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 468 | 480 | theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by |
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Control.Functor.Multivariate
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.M
import Mathlib.Data.QPF.Multivariate.Basic
#align_import data.qpf.multivariate.constructions.cofix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
universe u
open MvFunctor
namespace MvQPF
open TypeVec MvPFunctor
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type u} [mvf : MvFunctor F] [q : MvQPF F]
def corecF {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ fun x => repr (g x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.corecF MvQPF.corecF
theorem corecF_eq {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
M.dest q.P (corecF g x) = appendFun id (corecF g) <$$> repr (g x) := by
rw [corecF, M.dest_corec]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.corecF_eq MvQPF.corecF_eq
def IsPrecongr {α : TypeVec n} (r : q.P.M α → q.P.M α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x y⦄,
r x y →
abs (appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> M.dest q.P x) =
abs (appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> M.dest q.P y)
#align mvqpf.is_precongr MvQPF.IsPrecongr
def Mcongr {α : TypeVec n} (x y : q.P.M α) : Prop :=
∃ r, IsPrecongr r ∧ r x y
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.Mcongr MvQPF.Mcongr
def Cofix (F : TypeVec (n + 1) → Type u) [MvFunctor F] [q : MvQPF F] (α : TypeVec n) :=
Quot (@Mcongr _ F _ q α)
#align mvqpf.cofix MvQPF.Cofix
instance {α : TypeVec n} [Inhabited q.P.A] [∀ i : Fin2 n, Inhabited (α i)] :
Inhabited (Cofix F α) :=
⟨Quot.mk _ default⟩
def mRepr {α : TypeVec n} : q.P.M α → q.P.M α :=
corecF (abs ∘ M.dest q.P)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.Mrepr MvQPF.mRepr
def Cofix.map {α β : TypeVec n} (g : α ⟹ β) : Cofix F α → Cofix F β :=
Quot.lift (fun x : q.P.M α => Quot.mk Mcongr (g <$$> x))
(by
rintro aa₁ aa₂ ⟨r, pr, ra₁a₂⟩; apply Quot.sound
let r' b₁ b₂ := ∃ a₁ a₂ : q.P.M α, r a₁ a₂ ∧ b₁ = g <$$> a₁ ∧ b₂ = g <$$> a₂
use r'; constructor
· show IsPrecongr r'
rintro b₁ b₂ ⟨a₁, a₂, ra₁a₂, b₁eq, b₂eq⟩
let u : Quot r → Quot r' :=
Quot.lift (fun x : q.P.M α => Quot.mk r' (g <$$> x))
(by
intro a₁ a₂ ra₁a₂
apply Quot.sound
exact ⟨a₁, a₂, ra₁a₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
have hu : (Quot.mk r' ∘ fun x : q.P.M α => g <$$> x) = u ∘ Quot.mk r := by
ext x
rfl
rw [b₁eq, b₂eq, M.dest_map, M.dest_map, ← q.P.comp_map, ← q.P.comp_map]
rw [← appendFun_comp, id_comp, hu, ← comp_id g, appendFun_comp]
rw [q.P.comp_map, q.P.comp_map, abs_map, pr ra₁a₂, ← abs_map]
show r' (g <$$> aa₁) (g <$$> aa₂); exact ⟨aa₁, aa₂, ra₁a₂, rfl, rfl⟩)
#align mvqpf.cofix.map MvQPF.Cofix.map
instance Cofix.mvfunctor : MvFunctor (Cofix F) where map := @Cofix.map _ _ _ _
#align mvqpf.cofix.mvfunctor MvQPF.Cofix.mvfunctor
def Cofix.corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → Cofix F α := fun x =>
Quot.mk _ (corecF g x)
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec MvQPF.Cofix.corec
def Cofix.dest {α : TypeVec n} : Cofix F α → F (α.append1 (Cofix F α)) :=
Quot.lift (fun x => appendFun id (Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> abs (M.dest q.P x))
(by
rintro x y ⟨r, pr, rxy⟩
dsimp
have : ∀ x y, r x y → Mcongr x y := by
intro x y h
exact ⟨r, pr, h⟩
rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq _ _ this]
conv =>
lhs
rw [appendFun_comp_id, comp_map, ← abs_map, pr rxy, abs_map, ← comp_map,
← appendFun_comp_id])
#align mvqpf.cofix.dest MvQPF.Cofix.dest
def Cofix.abs {α} : q.P.M α → Cofix F α :=
Quot.mk _
#align mvqpf.cofix.abs MvQPF.Cofix.abs
def Cofix.repr {α} : Cofix F α → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ <| q.repr ∘ Cofix.dest
#align mvqpf.cofix.repr MvQPF.Cofix.repr
def Cofix.corec'₁ {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : ∀ {X}, (β → X) → F (α.append1 X)) (x : β) :
Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec (fun _ => g id) x
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec'₁ MvQPF.Cofix.corec'₁
def Cofix.corec' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 (Cofix F α ⊕ β))) (x : β) :
Cofix F α :=
let f : (α ::: Cofix F α) ⟹ (α ::: (Cofix F α ⊕ β)) := id ::: Sum.inl
Cofix.corec (Sum.elim (MvFunctor.map f ∘ Cofix.dest) g) (Sum.inr x : Cofix F α ⊕ β)
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec' MvQPF.Cofix.corec'
def Cofix.corec₁ {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u}
(g : ∀ {X}, (Cofix F α → X) → (β → X) → β → F (α ::: X)) (x : β) : Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec' (fun x => g Sum.inl Sum.inr x) x
#align mvqpf.cofix.corec₁ MvQPF.Cofix.corec₁
theorem Cofix.dest_corec {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
Cofix.dest (Cofix.corec g x) = appendFun id (Cofix.corec g) <$$> g x := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [Cofix.dest, Cofix.corec];
dsimp
rw [corecF_eq, abs_map, abs_repr, ← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp]; rfl
#align mvqpf.cofix.dest_corec MvQPF.Cofix.dest_corec
def Cofix.mk {α : TypeVec n} : F (α.append1 <| Cofix F α) → Cofix F α :=
Cofix.corec fun x => (appendFun id fun i : Cofix F α => Cofix.dest.{u} i) <$$> x
#align mvqpf.cofix.mk MvQPF.Cofix.mk
private theorem Cofix.bisim_aux {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop) (h' : ∀ x, r x x)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y →
appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest x = appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest y) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
intro x
rcases x; clear x; rename M (P F) α => x;
intro y
rcases y; clear y; rename M (P F) α => y;
intro rxy
apply Quot.sound
let r' := fun x y => r (Quot.mk _ x) (Quot.mk _ y)
have hr' : r' = fun x y => r (Quot.mk _ x) (Quot.mk _ y) := rfl
have : IsPrecongr r' := by
intro a b r'ab
have h₀ :
appendFun id (Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> MvQPF.abs (M.dest q.P a) =
appendFun id (Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr) <$$> MvQPF.abs (M.dest q.P b) := by
rw [appendFun_comp_id, comp_map, comp_map]; exact h _ _ r'ab
have h₁ : ∀ u v : q.P.M α, Mcongr u v → Quot.mk r' u = Quot.mk r' v := by
intro u v cuv
apply Quot.sound
dsimp [r', hr']
rw [Quot.sound cuv]
apply h'
let f : Quot r → Quot r' :=
Quot.lift (Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁)
(by
intro c
apply Quot.inductionOn
(motive := fun c =>
∀b, r c b → Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ c = Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ b) c
clear c
intro c d
apply Quot.inductionOn
(motive := fun d => r (Quot.mk Mcongr c) d →
Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ (Quot.mk Mcongr c) = Quot.lift (Quot.mk r') h₁ d) d
clear d
intro d rcd; apply Quot.sound; apply rcd)
have : f ∘ Quot.mk r ∘ Quot.mk Mcongr = Quot.mk r' := rfl
rw [← this, appendFun_comp_id, q.P.comp_map, q.P.comp_map, abs_map, abs_map, abs_map, abs_map,
h₀]
exact ⟨r', this, rxy⟩
theorem Cofix.bisim_rel {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y →
appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest x = appendFun id (Quot.mk r) <$$> Cofix.dest y) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
let r' (x y) := x = y ∨ r x y
intro x y rxy
apply Cofix.bisim_aux r'
· intro x
left
rfl
· intro x y r'xy
cases r'xy with
| inl h =>
rw [h]
| inr r'xy =>
have : ∀ x y, r x y → r' x y := fun x y h => Or.inr h
rw [← Quot.factor_mk_eq _ _ this]
dsimp [r']
rw [appendFun_comp_id]
rw [@comp_map _ _ _ q _ _ _ (appendFun id (Quot.mk r)),
@comp_map _ _ _ q _ _ _ (appendFun id (Quot.mk r))]
rw [h _ _ r'xy]
right; exact rxy
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim_rel MvQPF.Cofix.bisim_rel
theorem Cofix.bisim {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → LiftR (RelLast α r (i := _)) (Cofix.dest x) (Cofix.dest y)) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y := by
apply Cofix.bisim_rel
intro x y rxy
rcases (liftR_iff (fun a b => RelLast α r a b) (dest x) (dest y)).mp (h x y rxy)
with ⟨a, f₀, f₁, dxeq, dyeq, h'⟩
rw [dxeq, dyeq, ← abs_map, ← abs_map, MvPFunctor.map_eq, MvPFunctor.map_eq]
rw [← split_dropFun_lastFun f₀, ← split_dropFun_lastFun f₁]
rw [appendFun_comp_splitFun, appendFun_comp_splitFun]
rw [id_comp, id_comp]
congr 2 with (i j); cases' i with _ i
· apply Quot.sound
apply h' _ j
· change f₀ _ j = f₁ _ j
apply h' _ j
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim MvQPF.Cofix.bisim
open MvFunctor
theorem Cofix.bisim₂ {α : TypeVec n} (r : Cofix F α → Cofix F α → Prop)
(h : ∀ x y, r x y → LiftR' (RelLast' α r) (Cofix.dest x) (Cofix.dest y)) :
∀ x y, r x y → x = y :=
Cofix.bisim r <| by intros; rw [← LiftR_RelLast_iff]; apply h; assumption
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim₂ MvQPF.Cofix.bisim₂
theorem Cofix.bisim' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} (Q : β → Prop) (u v : β → Cofix F α)
(h : ∀ x, Q x → ∃ a f' f₀ f₁,
Cofix.dest (u x) = q.abs ⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₀⟩ ∧
Cofix.dest (v x) = q.abs ⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₁⟩ ∧
∀ i, ∃ x', Q x' ∧ f₀ i = u x' ∧ f₁ i = v x') :
∀ x, Q x → u x = v x := fun x Qx =>
let R := fun w z : Cofix F α => ∃ x', Q x' ∧ w = u x' ∧ z = v x'
Cofix.bisim R
(fun x y ⟨x', Qx', xeq, yeq⟩ => by
rcases h x' Qx' with ⟨a, f', f₀, f₁, ux'eq, vx'eq, h'⟩
rw [liftR_iff]
refine
⟨a, q.P.appendContents f' f₀, q.P.appendContents f' f₁, xeq.symm ▸ ux'eq,
yeq.symm ▸ vx'eq, ?_⟩
intro i; cases i
· apply h'
· intro j
apply Eq.refl)
_ _ ⟨x, Qx, rfl, rfl⟩
#align mvqpf.cofix.bisim' MvQPF.Cofix.bisim'
theorem Cofix.mk_dest {α : TypeVec n} (x : Cofix F α) : Cofix.mk (Cofix.dest x) = x := by
apply Cofix.bisim_rel (fun x y : Cofix F α => x = Cofix.mk (Cofix.dest y)) _ _ _ rfl;
dsimp
intro x y h
rw [h]
conv =>
lhs
congr
rfl
rw [Cofix.mk]
rw [Cofix.dest_corec]
rw [← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp, id_comp]
rw [← comp_map, ← appendFun_comp, id_comp, ← Cofix.mk]
congr
apply congrArg
funext x
apply Quot.sound;
rfl
#align mvqpf.cofix.mk_dest MvQPF.Cofix.mk_dest
theorem Cofix.dest_mk {α : TypeVec n} (x : F (α.append1 <| Cofix F α)) :
Cofix.dest (Cofix.mk x) = x := by
have : Cofix.mk ∘ Cofix.dest = @_root_.id (Cofix F α) := funext Cofix.mk_dest
rw [Cofix.mk, Cofix.dest_corec, ← comp_map, ← Cofix.mk, ← appendFun_comp, this, id_comp,
appendFun_id_id, MvFunctor.id_map]
#align mvqpf.cofix.dest_mk MvQPF.Cofix.dest_mk
theorem Cofix.ext {α : TypeVec n} (x y : Cofix F α) (h : x.dest = y.dest) : x = y := by
rw [← Cofix.mk_dest x, h, Cofix.mk_dest]
#align mvqpf.cofix.ext MvQPF.Cofix.ext
theorem Cofix.ext_mk {α : TypeVec n} (x y : F (α ::: Cofix F α)) (h : Cofix.mk x = Cofix.mk y) :
x = y := by rw [← Cofix.dest_mk x, h, Cofix.dest_mk]
#align mvqpf.cofix.ext_mk MvQPF.Cofix.ext_mk
section LiftRMap
theorem liftR_map {α β : TypeVec n} {F' : TypeVec n → Type u} [MvFunctor F'] [LawfulMvFunctor F']
(R : β ⊗ β ⟹ «repeat» n Prop) (x : F' α) (f g : α ⟹ β) (h : α ⟹ Subtype_ R)
(hh : subtypeVal _ ⊚ h = (f ⊗' g) ⊚ prod.diag) : LiftR' R (f <$$> x) (g <$$> x) := by
rw [LiftR_def]
exists h <$$> x
rw [MvFunctor.map_map, comp_assoc, hh, ← comp_assoc, fst_prod_mk, comp_assoc, fst_diag]
rw [MvFunctor.map_map, comp_assoc, hh, ← comp_assoc, snd_prod_mk, comp_assoc, snd_diag]
dsimp [LiftR']; constructor <;> rfl
#align mvqpf.liftr_map MvQPF.liftR_map
open Function
theorem liftR_map_last [lawful : LawfulMvFunctor F]
{α : TypeVec n} {ι ι'} (R : ι' → ι' → Prop)
(x : F (α ::: ι)) (f g : ι → ι') (hh : ∀ x : ι, R (f x) (g x)) :
LiftR' (RelLast' _ R) ((id ::: f) <$$> x) ((id ::: g) <$$> x) :=
let h : ι → { x : ι' × ι' // uncurry R x } := fun x => ⟨(f x, g x), hh x⟩
let b : (α ::: ι) ⟹ _ := @diagSub n α ::: h
let c :
(Subtype_ α.repeatEq ::: { x // uncurry R x }) ⟹
((fun i : Fin2 n => { x // ofRepeat (α.RelLast' R i.fs x) }) ::: Subtype (uncurry R)) :=
ofSubtype _ ::: id
have hh :
subtypeVal _ ⊚ toSubtype _ ⊚ fromAppend1DropLast ⊚ c ⊚ b =
((id ::: f) ⊗' (id ::: g)) ⊚ prod.diag := by
dsimp [b]
apply eq_of_drop_last_eq
· dsimp
simp only [prod_map_id, dropFun_prod, dropFun_appendFun, dropFun_diag, TypeVec.id_comp,
dropFun_toSubtype]
erw [toSubtype_of_subtype_assoc, TypeVec.id_comp]
clear liftR_map_last q mvf lawful F x R f g hh h b c
ext (i x) : 2
induction i with
| fz => rfl
| fs _ ih =>
apply ih
simp only [lastFun_from_append1_drop_last, lastFun_toSubtype, lastFun_appendFun,
lastFun_subtypeVal, Function.id_comp, lastFun_comp, lastFun_prod]
ext1
rfl
liftR_map _ _ _ _ (toSubtype _ ⊚ fromAppend1DropLast ⊚ c ⊚ b) hh
#align mvqpf.liftr_map_last MvQPF.liftR_map_last
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Constructions/Cofix.lean | 422 | 425 | theorem liftR_map_last' [LawfulMvFunctor F] {α : TypeVec n} {ι} (R : ι → ι → Prop) (x : F (α ::: ι))
(f : ι → ι) (hh : ∀ x : ι, R (f x) x) : LiftR' (RelLast' _ R) ((id ::: f) <$$> x) x := by |
have := liftR_map_last R x f id hh
rwa [appendFun_id_id, MvFunctor.id_map] at this
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Actions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.MulOpposite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import group_theory.coset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
open Function MulOpposite Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
#align left_coset HSMul.hSMul
#align left_add_coset HVAdd.hVAdd
#noalign right_coset
#noalign right_add_coset
-- Porting note: see https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.E2.9C.94.20to_additive.2Emap_namespace
run_cmd Lean.Elab.Command.liftCoreM <| ToAdditive.insertTranslation `QuotientGroup `QuotientAddGroup
namespace QuotientGroup
variable [Group α] (s : Subgroup α)
@[to_additive "The equivalence relation corresponding to the partition of a group by left cosets
of a subgroup."]
def leftRel : Setoid α :=
MulAction.orbitRel s.op α
#align quotient_group.left_rel QuotientGroup.leftRel
#align quotient_add_group.left_rel QuotientAddGroup.leftRel
variable {s}
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coset.lean | 302 | 308 | theorem leftRel_apply {x y : α} : @Setoid.r _ (leftRel s) x y ↔ x⁻¹ * y ∈ s :=
calc
(∃ a : s.op, y * MulOpposite.unop a = x) ↔ ∃ a : s, y * a = x :=
s.equivOp.symm.exists_congr_left
_ ↔ ∃ a : s, x⁻¹ * y = a⁻¹ := by |
simp only [inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, Subgroup.coe_inv, eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]
_ ↔ x⁻¹ * y ∈ s := by simp [exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem]
|
import Mathlib.Control.Bifunctor
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
#align_import logic.equiv.functor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9407b03373c8cd201df99d6bc5514fc2db44054f"
universe u v w
variable {α β : Type u}
open Equiv
namespace Bifunctor
variable {α' β' : Type v} (F : Type u → Type v → Type w) [Bifunctor F] [LawfulBifunctor F]
def mapEquiv (h : α ≃ β) (h' : α' ≃ β') : F α α' ≃ F β β' where
toFun := bimap h h'
invFun := bimap h.symm h'.symm
left_inv x := by simp [bimap_bimap, id_bimap]
right_inv x := by simp [bimap_bimap, id_bimap]
#align bifunctor.map_equiv Bifunctor.mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (h : α ≃ β) (h' : α' ≃ β') (x : F α α') :
(mapEquiv F h h' : F α α' ≃ F β β') x = bimap h h' x :=
rfl
#align bifunctor.map_equiv_apply Bifunctor.mapEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm_apply (h : α ≃ β) (h' : α' ≃ β') (y : F β β') :
(mapEquiv F h h' : F α α' ≃ F β β').symm y = bimap h.symm h'.symm y :=
rfl
#align bifunctor.map_equiv_symm_apply Bifunctor.mapEquiv_symm_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Functor.lean | 90 | 92 | theorem mapEquiv_refl_refl : mapEquiv F (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl α') = Equiv.refl (F α α') := by |
ext x
simp [id_bimap]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inverse
#align_import analysis.calculus.cont_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical NNReal Nat
local notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
universe u v w uD uE uF uG
attribute [local instance 1001]
NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup NormedSpace.toModule' AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid
open Set Fin Filter Function
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {D : Type uD} [NormedAddCommGroup D]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 D] {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type uF}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {G : Type uG} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
{X : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace 𝕜 X] {s s₁ t u : Set E} {f f₁ : E → F}
{g : F → G} {x x₀ : E} {c : F} {b : E × F → G} {m n : ℕ∞} {p : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F}
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) s x = 0 := by
induction i generalizing x with
| zero => ext; simp
| succ i IH =>
ext m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left, fderivWithin_congr (fun _ ↦ IH) (IH hx)]
rw [fderivWithin_const_apply _ (hs x hx)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun {n : ℕ} : (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ (0 : F)) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simpa [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ] using
iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x)
#align iterated_fderiv_zero_fun iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun
theorem contDiff_zero_fun : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => (0 : F) :=
contDiff_of_differentiable_iteratedFDeriv fun m _ => by
rw [iteratedFDeriv_zero_fun]
exact differentiable_const (0 : E[×m]→L[𝕜] F)
#align cont_diff_zero_fun contDiff_zero_fun
theorem contDiff_const {c : F} : ContDiff 𝕜 n fun _ : E => c := by
suffices h : ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ fun _ : E => c from h.of_le le_top
rw [contDiff_top_iff_fderiv]
refine ⟨differentiable_const c, ?_⟩
rw [fderiv_const]
exact contDiff_zero_fun
#align cont_diff_const contDiff_const
theorem contDiffOn_const {c : F} {s : Set E} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s :=
contDiff_const.contDiffOn
#align cont_diff_on_const contDiffOn_const
theorem contDiffAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) x :=
contDiff_const.contDiffAt
#align cont_diff_at_const contDiffAt_const
theorem contDiffWithinAt_const {c : F} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun _ : E => c) s x :=
contDiffAt_const.contDiffWithinAt
#align cont_diff_within_at_const contDiffWithinAt_const
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiff_const
#align cont_diff_of_subsingleton contDiff_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffAt_const
#align cont_diff_at_of_subsingleton contDiffAt_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffWithinAt_const
#align cont_diff_within_at_of_subsingleton contDiffWithinAt_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem contDiffOn_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton F] : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim f fun _ => 0]; exact contDiffOn_const
#align cont_diff_on_of_subsingleton contDiffOn_of_subsingleton
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 (n + 1) (fun _ : E ↦ c) s x = 0 := by
ext m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_right hs hx]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_congr (fun y hy ↦ fderivWithin_const_apply c (hs y hy)) hx]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_fun hs hx]
simp [ContinuousMultilinearMap.zero_apply (R := 𝕜)]
theorem iteratedFDeriv_succ_const (n : ℕ) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 (n + 1) fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simpa [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ] using
iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x)
#align iterated_fderiv_succ_const iteratedFDeriv_succ_const
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n (fun _ : E ↦ c) s x = 0 := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_const n c hs hx
theorem iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (c : F) :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n fun _ : E ↦ c) = 0 :=
funext fun x ↦ by simpa [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ] using
iteratedFDerivWithin_const_of_ne hn c uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x)
#align iterated_fderiv_const_of_ne iteratedFDeriv_const_of_ne
theorem IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff (hf : IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 f) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
suffices h : ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ f from h.of_le le_top
rw [contDiff_top_iff_fderiv]
refine ⟨hf.differentiable, ?_⟩
simp_rw [hf.fderiv]
exact contDiff_const
#align is_bounded_linear_map.cont_diff IsBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff (f : E →L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.isBoundedLinearMap.contDiff
#align continuous_linear_map.cont_diff ContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃L[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometry.contDiff (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
f.toContinuousLinearMap.contDiff
#align linear_isometry.cont_diff LinearIsometry.contDiff
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
(f : E →L[𝕜] F).contDiff
#align linear_isometry_equiv.cont_diff LinearIsometryEquiv.contDiff
theorem contDiff_id : ContDiff 𝕜 n (id : E → E) :=
IsBoundedLinearMap.id.contDiff
#align cont_diff_id contDiff_id
theorem contDiffWithinAt_id {s x} : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffWithinAt
#align cont_diff_within_at_id contDiffWithinAt_id
theorem contDiffAt_id {x} : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (id : E → E) x :=
contDiff_id.contDiffAt
#align cont_diff_at_id contDiffAt_id
theorem contDiffOn_id {s} : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (id : E → E) s :=
contDiff_id.contDiffOn
#align cont_diff_on_id contDiffOn_id
theorem IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff (hb : IsBoundedBilinearMap 𝕜 b) : ContDiff 𝕜 n b := by
suffices h : ContDiff 𝕜 ∞ b from h.of_le le_top
rw [contDiff_top_iff_fderiv]
refine ⟨hb.differentiable, ?_⟩
simp only [hb.fderiv]
exact hb.isBoundedLinearMap_deriv.contDiff
#align is_bounded_bilinear_map.cont_diff IsBoundedBilinearMap.contDiff
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (g ∘ f) (fun x k => g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (p x k)) s where
zero_eq x hx := congr_arg g (hf.zero_eq x hx)
fderivWithin m hm x hx := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx)
cont m hm := (ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜
(fun _ : Fin m => E) F G g).continuous.comp_continuousOn (hf.cont m hm)
#align has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.continuous_linear_map_comp HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.continuousLinearMap_comp
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := fun m hm ↦ by
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, _, hp.continuousLinearMap_comp g⟩
#align cont_diff_within_at.continuous_linear_map_comp ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp
theorem ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) x :=
ContDiffWithinAt.continuousLinearMap_comp g hf
#align cont_diff_at.continuous_linear_map_comp ContDiffAt.continuousLinearMap_comp
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousLinearMap_comp g
#align cont_diff_on.continuous_linear_map_comp ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp
theorem ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x => g (f x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.continuousLinearMap_comp _ (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf)
#align cont_diff.continuous_linear_map_comp ContDiff.continuousLinearMap_comp
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : (i : ℕ∞) ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
(((hf.ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).continuousLinearMap_comp g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn
hi hs hx).symm
#align continuous_linear_map.iterated_fderiv_within_comp_left ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →L[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : E) {i : ℕ} (hi : (i : ℕ∞) ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x = g.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x) := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
#align continuous_linear_map.iterated_fderiv_comp_left ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_left
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃L[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1 m
simp only [Nat.zero_eq, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, coe_coe]
· ext1 m
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have Z : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s) s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (g.compContinuousMultilinearMapL (fun _ : Fin i => E) ∘
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s) s x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
simp_rw [Z]
rw [(g.compContinuousMultilinearMapL fun _ : Fin i => E).comp_fderivWithin (hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
rw [iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.iterated_fderiv_within_comp_left ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : (i : ℕ∞) ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf hs hx hi
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
#align linear_isometry.norm_iterated_fderiv_within_comp_left LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left {f : E → F} (g : F →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G)
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : E) {i : ℕ} (hi : (i : ℕ∞) ≤ n) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) hi
#align linear_isometry.norm_iterated_fderiv_comp_left LinearIsometry.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x‖ := by
have :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) s x =
(g : F →L[𝕜] G).compContinuousMultilinearMap (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s x) :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f hs hx i
rw [this]
apply LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap g.toLinearIsometry
#align linear_isometry_equiv.norm_iterated_fderiv_within_comp_left LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left (g : F ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] G) (f : E → F) (x : E)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (g ∘ f) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f x‖ := by
rw [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_left f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ x) i
#align linear_isometry_equiv.norm_iterated_fderiv_comp_left LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_left
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s x ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x :=
⟨fun H => by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), e.symm.coe_coe, e.symm_apply_apply] using
H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e.symm : G →L[𝕜] F),
fun H => H.continuousLinearMap_comp (e : F →L[𝕜] G)⟩
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_cont_diff_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) x ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
simp only [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_cont_diff_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffAt_iff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) s ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
simp [ContDiffOn, e.comp_contDiffWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_cont_diff_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiffOn_iff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff (e : F ≃L[𝕜] G) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (e ∘ f) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
simp only [← contDiffOn_univ, e.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_cont_diff_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_contDiff_iff
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap (hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s)
(g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (f ∘ g) (fun x k => (p (g x) k).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g)
(g ⁻¹' s) := by
let A : ∀ m : ℕ, (E[×m]→L[𝕜] F) → G[×m]→L[𝕜] F := fun m h => h.compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g
have hA : ∀ m, IsBoundedLinearMap 𝕜 (A m) := fun m =>
isBoundedLinearMap_continuousMultilinearMap_comp_linear g
constructor
· intro x hx
simp only [(hf.zero_eq (g x) hx).symm, Function.comp_apply]
change (p (g x) 0 fun _ : Fin 0 => g 0) = p (g x) 0 0
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.map_zero]
rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (hA m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm (g x) hx).comp x g.hasFDerivWithinAt (Subset.refl _))
ext y v
change p (g x) (Nat.succ m) (g ∘ cons y v) = p (g x) m.succ (cons (g y) (g ∘ v))
rw [comp_cons]
· intro m hm
exact (hA m).continuous.comp_continuousOn <| (hf.cont m hm).comp g.continuous.continuousOn <|
Subset.refl _
#align has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.comp_continuous_linear_map HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.compContinuousLinearMap
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap {x : G} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s (g x)) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x := by
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
refine ⟨g ⁻¹' u, ?_, _, hp.compContinuousLinearMap g⟩
refine g.continuous.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin ?_ hu
exact (mapsTo_singleton.2 <| mem_singleton _).union_union (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
#align cont_diff_within_at.comp_continuous_linear_map ContDiffWithinAt.comp_continuousLinearMap
theorem ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (g : G →L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) := fun x hx => (hf (g x) hx).comp_continuousLinearMap g
#align cont_diff_on.comp_continuous_linear_map ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap
theorem ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap {f : E → F} {g : G →L[𝕜] E} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ g) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp_continuousLinearMap (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) _
#align cont_diff.comp_continuous_linear_map ContDiff.comp_continuousLinearMap
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right {f : E → F} (g : G →L[𝕜] E)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (h's : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (g ⁻¹' s)) {x : G}
(hx : g x ∈ s) {i : ℕ} (hi : (i : ℕ∞) ≤ n) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
(((hf.ftaylorSeriesWithin hs).compContinuousLinearMap g).eq_iteratedFDerivWithin_of_uniqueDiffOn
hi h's hx).symm
#align continuous_linear_map.iterated_fderiv_within_comp_right ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃L[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
induction' i with i IH generalizing x
· ext1
simp only [Nat.zero_eq, iteratedFDerivWithin_zero_apply, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
· ext1 m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply,
ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left]
have : fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s)) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
fderivWithin 𝕜
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapEquivL _ (fun _x : Fin i => g) ∘
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s ∘ g)) (g ⁻¹' s) x :=
fderivWithin_congr' (@IH) hx
rw [this, ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx)]
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe, comp_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMapEquivL_apply,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.compContinuousLinearMap_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin _ (g.uniqueDiffOn_preimage_iff.2 hs x hx),
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', coe_coe, comp_apply, tail_def, tail_def]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.iterated_fderiv_within_comp_right ContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G →L[𝕜] E) {f : E → F}
(hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (x : G) {i : ℕ} (hi : (i : ℕ∞) ≤ n) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x =
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
exact g.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right hf.contDiffOn uniqueDiffOn_univ uniqueDiffOn_univ
(mem_univ _) hi
#align continuous_linear_map.iterated_fderiv_comp_right ContinuousLinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_comp_right
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F)
(hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {x : G} (hx : g x ∈ s) (i : ℕ) :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)‖ := by
have : iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) (g ⁻¹' s) x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 i f s (g x)).compContinuousLinearMap fun _ => g :=
g.toContinuousLinearEquiv.iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f hs hx i
rw [this, ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_compContinuous_linearIsometryEquiv]
#align linear_isometry_equiv.norm_iterated_fderiv_within_comp_right LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_right (g : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E) (f : E → F) (x : G)
(i : ℕ) : ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i (f ∘ g) x‖ = ‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 i f (g x)‖ := by
simp only [← iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
apply g.norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_comp_right f uniqueDiffOn_univ (mem_univ (g x)) i
#align linear_isometry_equiv.norm_iterated_fderiv_comp_right LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_iteratedFDeriv_comp_right
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x := by
constructor
· intro H
simpa [← preimage_comp, (· ∘ ·)] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G)
· intro H
rw [← e.apply_symm_apply x, ← e.coe_coe] at H
exact H.comp_continuousLinearMap _
#align continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff_within_at_comp_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffAt_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e.symm x) ↔ ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
rw [← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← contDiffWithinAt_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffWithinAt_comp_iff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff_at_comp_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffAt_comp_iff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffOn_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) ↔ ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
⟨fun H => by simpa [(· ∘ ·)] using H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e.symm : E →L[𝕜] G), fun H =>
H.comp_continuousLinearMap (e : G →L[𝕜] E)⟩
#align continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff_on_comp_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiffOn_comp_iff
theorem ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff_comp_iff (e : G ≃L[𝕜] E) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (f ∘ e) ↔ ContDiff 𝕜 n f := by
rw [← contDiffOn_univ, ← contDiffOn_univ, ← preimage_univ]
exact e.contDiffOn_comp_iff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.cont_diff_comp_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.contDiff_comp_iff
theorem HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prod (hf : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n f p s) {g : E → G}
{q : E → FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E G} (hg : HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n g q s) :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn n (fun y => (f y, g y)) (fun y k => (p y k).prod (q y k)) s := by
set L := fun m => ContinuousMultilinearMap.prodL 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin m => E) F G
constructor
· intro x hx; rw [← hf.zero_eq x hx, ← hg.zero_eq x hx]; rfl
· intro m hm x hx
convert (L m).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
((hf.fderivWithin m hm x hx).prod (hg.fderivWithin m hm x hx))
· intro m hm
exact (L m).continuous.comp_continuousOn ((hf.cont m hm).prod (hg.cont m hm))
#align has_ftaylor_series_up_to_on.prod HasFTaylorSeriesUpToOn.prod
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.prod {s : Set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g s x) : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) s x := by
intro m hm
rcases hf m hm with ⟨u, hu, p, hp⟩
rcases hg m hm with ⟨v, hv, q, hq⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, Filter.inter_mem hu hv, _,
(hp.mono inter_subset_left).prod (hq.mono inter_subset_right)⟩
#align cont_diff_within_at.prod ContDiffWithinAt.prod
theorem ContDiffOn.prod {s : Set E} {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prod (hg x hx)
#align cont_diff_on.prod ContDiffOn.prod
theorem ContDiffAt.prod {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x)
(hg : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n g x) : ContDiffAt 𝕜 n (fun x : E => (f x, g x)) x :=
contDiffWithinAt_univ.1 <|
ContDiffWithinAt.prod (contDiffWithinAt_univ.2 hf) (contDiffWithinAt_univ.2 hg)
#align cont_diff_at.prod ContDiffAt.prod
theorem ContDiff.prod {f : E → F} {g : E → G} (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n fun x : E => (f x, g x) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.prod (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) (contDiffOn_univ.2 hg)
#align cont_diff.prod ContDiff.prod
private theorem ContDiffOn.comp_same_univ {Eu : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup Eu] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Eu]
{Fu : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup Fu] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Fu] {Gu : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup Gu]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 Gu] {s : Set Eu} {t : Set Fu} {g : Fu → Gu} {f : Eu → Fu}
(hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t) (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := by
induction' n using ENat.nat_induction with n IH Itop generalizing Eu Fu Gu
· rw [contDiffOn_zero] at hf hg ⊢
exact ContinuousOn.comp hg hf st
· rw [contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt] at hg ⊢
intro x hx
rcases (contDiffOn_succ_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt.1 hf) x hx with ⟨u, hu, f', hf', f'_diff⟩
rcases hg (f x) (st hx) with ⟨v, hv, g', hg', g'_diff⟩
rw [insert_eq_of_mem hx] at hu ⊢
have xu : x ∈ u := mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx hu
let w := s ∩ (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
have wv : w ⊆ f ⁻¹' v := fun y hy => hy.2.2
have wu : w ⊆ u := fun y hy => hy.2.1
have ws : w ⊆ s := fun y hy => hy.1
refine ⟨w, ?_, fun y => (g' (f y)).comp (f' y), ?_, ?_⟩
· show w ∈ 𝓝[s] x
apply Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin
apply Filter.inter_mem hu
apply ContinuousWithinAt.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
· rw [← continuousWithinAt_inter' hu]
exact (hf' x xu).differentiableWithinAt.continuousWithinAt.mono inter_subset_right
· apply nhdsWithin_mono _ _ hv
exact Subset.trans (image_subset_iff.mpr st) (subset_insert (f x) t)
· show ∀ y ∈ w, HasFDerivWithinAt (g ∘ f) ((g' (f y)).comp (f' y)) w y
rintro y ⟨-, yu, yv⟩
exact (hg' (f y) yv).comp y ((hf' y yu).mono wu) wv
· show ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun y => (g' (f y)).comp (f' y)) w
have A : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun y => g' (f y)) w :=
IH g'_diff ((hf.of_le (WithTop.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_succ n))).mono ws) wv
have B : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f' w := f'_diff.mono wu
have C : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun y => (g' (f y), f' y)) w := A.prod B
have D : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fun p : (Fu →L[𝕜] Gu) × (Eu →L[𝕜] Fu) => p.1.comp p.2) univ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.contDiff.contDiffOn
exact IH D C (subset_univ _)
· rw [contDiffOn_top] at hf hg ⊢
exact fun n => Itop n (hg n) (hf n) st
theorem ContDiffOn.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s := by
let Eu : Type max uE uF uG := ULift.{max uF uG} E
let Fu : Type max uE uF uG := ULift.{max uE uG} F
let Gu : Type max uE uF uG := ULift.{max uE uF} G
-- declare the isomorphisms
have isoE : Eu ≃L[𝕜] E := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
have isoF : Fu ≃L[𝕜] F := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
have isoG : Gu ≃L[𝕜] G := ContinuousLinearEquiv.ulift
-- lift the functions to the new spaces, check smoothness there, and then go back.
let fu : Eu → Fu := (isoF.symm ∘ f) ∘ isoE
have fu_diff : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n fu (isoE ⁻¹' s) := by
rwa [isoE.contDiffOn_comp_iff, isoF.symm.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
let gu : Fu → Gu := (isoG.symm ∘ g) ∘ isoF
have gu_diff : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n gu (isoF ⁻¹' t) := by
rwa [isoF.contDiffOn_comp_iff, isoG.symm.comp_contDiffOn_iff]
have main : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (gu ∘ fu) (isoE ⁻¹' s) := by
apply ContDiffOn.comp_same_univ gu_diff fu_diff
intro y hy
simp only [fu, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_apply, Function.comp_apply, mem_preimage]
rw [isoF.apply_symm_apply (f (isoE y))]
exact st hy
have : gu ∘ fu = (isoG.symm ∘ g ∘ f) ∘ isoE := by
ext y
simp only [fu, gu, Function.comp_apply]
rw [isoF.apply_symm_apply (f (isoE y))]
rwa [this, isoE.contDiffOn_comp_iff, isoG.symm.comp_contDiffOn_iff] at main
#align cont_diff_on.comp ContDiffOn.comp
theorem ContDiffOn.comp' {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g t)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
#align cont_diff_on.comp' ContDiffOn.comp'
theorem ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn {s : Set E} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g)
(hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s :=
(contDiffOn_univ.2 hg).comp hf subset_preimage_univ
#align cont_diff.comp_cont_diff_on ContDiff.comp_contDiffOn
theorem ContDiff.comp {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (hg : ContDiff 𝕜 n g) (hf : ContDiff 𝕜 n f) :
ContDiff 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) :=
contDiffOn_univ.1 <| ContDiffOn.comp (contDiffOn_univ.2 hg) (contDiffOn_univ.2 hf) (subset_univ _)
#align cont_diff.comp ContDiff.comp
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ContDiff/Basic.lean | 682 | 706 | theorem ContDiffWithinAt.comp {s : Set E} {t : Set F} {g : F → G} {f : E → F} (x : E)
(hg : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n g t (f x)) (hf : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (st : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n (g ∘ f) s x := by |
intro m hm
rcases hg.contDiffOn hm with ⟨u, u_nhd, _, hu⟩
rcases hf.contDiffOn hm with ⟨v, v_nhd, vs, hv⟩
have xmem : x ∈ f ⁻¹' u ∩ v :=
⟨(mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert (f x) _) u_nhd : _),
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_insert x s) v_nhd⟩
have : f ⁻¹' u ∈ 𝓝[insert x s] x := by
apply hf.continuousWithinAt.insert_self.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin'
apply nhdsWithin_mono _ _ u_nhd
rw [image_insert_eq]
exact insert_subset_insert (image_subset_iff.mpr st)
have Z :=
(hu.comp (hv.mono inter_subset_right) inter_subset_left).contDiffWithinAt
xmem m le_rfl
have : 𝓝[f ⁻¹' u ∩ v] x = 𝓝[insert x s] x := by
have A : f ⁻¹' u ∩ v = insert x s ∩ (f ⁻¹' u ∩ v) := by
apply Subset.antisymm _ inter_subset_right
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
simpa only [mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, hy2, and_true, true_and, vs hy2] using hy1
rw [A, ← nhdsWithin_restrict'']
exact Filter.inter_mem this v_nhd
rwa [insert_eq_of_mem xmem, this] at Z
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Star
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
#align_import topology.instances.matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
open Matrix
variable {X α l m n p S R : Type*} {m' n' : l → Type*}
instance [TopologicalSpace R] : TopologicalSpace (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.topologicalSpace
instance [TopologicalSpace R] [T2Space R] : T2Space (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.t2Space
section Continuity
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace R]
instance [SMul α R] [ContinuousConstSMul α R] : ContinuousConstSMul α (Matrix m n R) :=
inferInstanceAs (ContinuousConstSMul α (m → n → R))
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [SMul α R] [ContinuousSMul α R] : ContinuousSMul α (Matrix m n R) :=
inferInstanceAs (ContinuousSMul α (m → n → R))
instance [Add R] [ContinuousAdd R] : ContinuousAdd (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.continuousAdd
instance [Neg R] [ContinuousNeg R] : ContinuousNeg (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.continuousNeg
instance [AddGroup R] [TopologicalAddGroup R] : TopologicalAddGroup (Matrix m n R) :=
Pi.topologicalAddGroup
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_matrix [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → Matrix m n R}
(h : ∀ i j, Continuous fun a => f a i j) : Continuous f :=
continuous_pi fun _ => continuous_pi fun _ => h _ _
#align continuous_matrix continuous_matrix
theorem Continuous.matrix_elem {A : X → Matrix m n R} (hA : Continuous A) (i : m) (j : n) :
Continuous fun x => A x i j :=
(continuous_apply_apply i j).comp hA
#align continuous.matrix_elem Continuous.matrix_elem
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_map [TopologicalSpace S] {A : X → Matrix m n S} {f : S → R}
(hA : Continuous A) (hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun x => (A x).map f :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ => hf.comp <| hA.matrix_elem _ _
#align continuous.matrix_map Continuous.matrix_map
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_transpose {A : X → Matrix m n R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => (A x)ᵀ :=
continuous_matrix fun i j => hA.matrix_elem j i
#align continuous.matrix_transpose Continuous.matrix_transpose
theorem Continuous.matrix_conjTranspose [Star R] [ContinuousStar R] {A : X → Matrix m n R}
(hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => (A x)ᴴ :=
hA.matrix_transpose.matrix_map continuous_star
#align continuous.matrix_conj_transpose Continuous.matrix_conjTranspose
instance [Star R] [ContinuousStar R] : ContinuousStar (Matrix m m R) :=
⟨continuous_id.matrix_conjTranspose⟩
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_col {A : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => col (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun i _ => (continuous_apply i).comp hA
#align continuous.matrix_col Continuous.matrix_col
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_row {A : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => row (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ => (continuous_apply _).comp hA
#align continuous.matrix_row Continuous.matrix_row
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_diagonal [Zero R] [DecidableEq n] {A : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => diagonal (A x) :=
continuous_matrix fun i _ => ((continuous_apply i).comp hA).if_const _ continuous_zero
#align continuous.matrix_diagonal Continuous.matrix_diagonal
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_dotProduct [Fintype n] [Mul R] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R]
[ContinuousMul R] {A : X → n → R} {B : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => dotProduct (A x) (B x) :=
continuous_finset_sum _ fun i _ =>
((continuous_apply i).comp hA).mul ((continuous_apply i).comp hB)
#align continuous.matrix_dot_product Continuous.matrix_dotProduct
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_mul [Fintype n] [Mul R] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R]
[ContinuousMul R] {A : X → Matrix m n R} {B : X → Matrix n p R} (hA : Continuous A)
(hB : Continuous B) : Continuous fun x => A x * B x :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ =>
continuous_finset_sum _ fun _ _ => (hA.matrix_elem _ _).mul (hB.matrix_elem _ _)
#align continuous.matrix_mul Continuous.matrix_mul
instance [Fintype n] [Mul R] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R] [ContinuousMul R] :
ContinuousMul (Matrix n n R) :=
⟨continuous_fst.matrix_mul continuous_snd⟩
instance [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [TopologicalSemiring R] :
TopologicalSemiring (Matrix n n R) where
instance Matrix.topologicalRing [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [TopologicalRing R] :
TopologicalRing (Matrix n n R) where
#align matrix.topological_ring Matrix.topologicalRing
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_vecMulVec [Mul R] [ContinuousMul R] {A : X → m → R} {B : X → n → R}
(hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) : Continuous fun x => vecMulVec (A x) (B x) :=
continuous_matrix fun _ _ => ((continuous_apply _).comp hA).mul ((continuous_apply _).comp hB)
#align continuous.matrix_vec_mul_vec Continuous.matrix_vecMulVec
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_mulVec [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [ContinuousAdd R] [ContinuousMul R]
[Fintype n] {A : X → Matrix m n R} {B : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => A x *ᵥ B x :=
continuous_pi fun i => ((continuous_apply i).comp hA).matrix_dotProduct hB
#align continuous.matrix_mul_vec Continuous.matrix_mulVec
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_vecMul [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring R] [ContinuousAdd R] [ContinuousMul R]
[Fintype m] {A : X → m → R} {B : X → Matrix m n R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => A x ᵥ* B x :=
continuous_pi fun _i => hA.matrix_dotProduct <| continuous_pi fun _j => hB.matrix_elem _ _
#align continuous.matrix_vec_mul Continuous.matrix_vecMul
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_submatrix {A : X → Matrix l n R} (hA : Continuous A) (e₁ : m → l)
(e₂ : p → n) : Continuous fun x => (A x).submatrix e₁ e₂ :=
continuous_matrix fun _i _j => hA.matrix_elem _ _
#align continuous.matrix_submatrix Continuous.matrix_submatrix
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_reindex {A : X → Matrix l n R} (hA : Continuous A) (e₁ : l ≃ m)
(e₂ : n ≃ p) : Continuous fun x => reindex e₁ e₂ (A x) :=
hA.matrix_submatrix _ _
#align continuous.matrix_reindex Continuous.matrix_reindex
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_diag {A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) :
Continuous fun x => Matrix.diag (A x) :=
continuous_pi fun _ => hA.matrix_elem _ _
#align continuous.matrix_diag Continuous.matrix_diag
-- note this doesn't elaborate well from the above
theorem continuous_matrix_diag : Continuous (Matrix.diag : Matrix n n R → n → R) :=
show Continuous fun x : Matrix n n R => Matrix.diag x from continuous_id.matrix_diag
#align continuous_matrix_diag continuous_matrix_diag
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_trace [Fintype n] [AddCommMonoid R] [ContinuousAdd R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => trace (A x) :=
continuous_finset_sum _ fun _ _ => hA.matrix_elem _ _
#align continuous.matrix_trace Continuous.matrix_trace
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_det [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [TopologicalRing R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => (A x).det := by
simp_rw [Matrix.det_apply]
refine continuous_finset_sum _ fun l _ => Continuous.const_smul ?_ _
exact continuous_finset_prod _ fun l _ => hA.matrix_elem _ _
#align continuous.matrix_det Continuous.matrix_det
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_updateColumn [DecidableEq n] (i : n) {A : X → Matrix m n R}
{B : X → m → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => (A x).updateColumn i (B x) :=
continuous_matrix fun _j k =>
(continuous_apply k).comp <|
((continuous_apply _).comp hA).update i ((continuous_apply _).comp hB)
#align continuous.matrix_update_column Continuous.matrix_updateColumn
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_updateRow [DecidableEq m] (i : m) {A : X → Matrix m n R} {B : X → n → R}
(hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) : Continuous fun x => (A x).updateRow i (B x) :=
hA.update i hB
#align continuous.matrix_update_row Continuous.matrix_updateRow
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_cramer [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [TopologicalRing R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} {B : X → n → R} (hA : Continuous A) (hB : Continuous B) :
Continuous fun x => cramer (A x) (B x) :=
continuous_pi fun _ => (hA.matrix_updateColumn _ hB).matrix_det
#align continuous.matrix_cramer Continuous.matrix_cramer
@[continuity]
theorem Continuous.matrix_adjugate [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [TopologicalRing R]
{A : X → Matrix n n R} (hA : Continuous A) : Continuous fun x => (A x).adjugate :=
continuous_matrix fun _j k =>
(hA.matrix_transpose.matrix_updateColumn k continuous_const).matrix_det
#align continuous.matrix_adjugate Continuous.matrix_adjugate
theorem continuousAt_matrix_inv [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing R] [TopologicalRing R]
(A : Matrix n n R) (h : ContinuousAt Ring.inverse A.det) : ContinuousAt Inv.inv A :=
(h.comp continuous_id.matrix_det.continuousAt).smul continuous_id.matrix_adjugate.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_matrix_inv continuousAt_matrix_inv
-- lemmas about functions in `Data/Matrix/Block.lean`
section tsum
variable [Semiring α] [AddCommMonoid R] [TopologicalSpace R] [Module α R]
theorem HasSum.matrix_transpose {f : X → Matrix m n R} {a : Matrix m n R} (hf : HasSum f a) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x)ᵀ) aᵀ :=
(hf.map (Matrix.transposeAddEquiv m n R) continuous_id.matrix_transpose : _)
#align has_sum.matrix_transpose HasSum.matrix_transpose
theorem Summable.matrix_transpose {f : X → Matrix m n R} (hf : Summable f) :
Summable fun x => (f x)ᵀ :=
hf.hasSum.matrix_transpose.summable
#align summable.matrix_transpose Summable.matrix_transpose
@[simp]
theorem summable_matrix_transpose {f : X → Matrix m n R} :
(Summable fun x => (f x)ᵀ) ↔ Summable f :=
Summable.map_iff_of_equiv (Matrix.transposeAddEquiv m n R)
continuous_id.matrix_transpose continuous_id.matrix_transpose
#align summable_matrix_transpose summable_matrix_transpose
theorem Matrix.transpose_tsum [T2Space R] {f : X → Matrix m n R} : (∑' x, f x)ᵀ = ∑' x, (f x)ᵀ := by
by_cases hf : Summable f
· exact hf.hasSum.matrix_transpose.tsum_eq.symm
· have hft := summable_matrix_transpose.not.mpr hf
rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hft, transpose_zero]
#align matrix.transpose_tsum Matrix.transpose_tsum
theorem HasSum.matrix_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid R] [ContinuousStar R] {f : X → Matrix m n R}
{a : Matrix m n R} (hf : HasSum f a) : HasSum (fun x => (f x)ᴴ) aᴴ :=
(hf.map (Matrix.conjTransposeAddEquiv m n R) continuous_id.matrix_conjTranspose : _)
#align has_sum.matrix_conj_transpose HasSum.matrix_conjTranspose
theorem Summable.matrix_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid R] [ContinuousStar R] {f : X → Matrix m n R}
(hf : Summable f) : Summable fun x => (f x)ᴴ :=
hf.hasSum.matrix_conjTranspose.summable
#align summable.matrix_conj_transpose Summable.matrix_conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem summable_matrix_conjTranspose [StarAddMonoid R] [ContinuousStar R] {f : X → Matrix m n R} :
(Summable fun x => (f x)ᴴ) ↔ Summable f :=
Summable.map_iff_of_equiv (Matrix.conjTransposeAddEquiv m n R)
continuous_id.matrix_conjTranspose continuous_id.matrix_conjTranspose
#align summable_matrix_conj_transpose summable_matrix_conjTranspose
theorem Matrix.conjTranspose_tsum [StarAddMonoid R] [ContinuousStar R] [T2Space R]
{f : X → Matrix m n R} : (∑' x, f x)ᴴ = ∑' x, (f x)ᴴ := by
by_cases hf : Summable f
· exact hf.hasSum.matrix_conjTranspose.tsum_eq.symm
· have hft := summable_matrix_conjTranspose.not.mpr hf
rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hft, conjTranspose_zero]
#align matrix.conj_transpose_tsum Matrix.conjTranspose_tsum
theorem HasSum.matrix_diagonal [DecidableEq n] {f : X → n → R} {a : n → R} (hf : HasSum f a) :
HasSum (fun x => diagonal (f x)) (diagonal a) :=
hf.map (diagonalAddMonoidHom n R) continuous_id.matrix_diagonal
#align has_sum.matrix_diagonal HasSum.matrix_diagonal
theorem Summable.matrix_diagonal [DecidableEq n] {f : X → n → R} (hf : Summable f) :
Summable fun x => diagonal (f x) :=
hf.hasSum.matrix_diagonal.summable
#align summable.matrix_diagonal Summable.matrix_diagonal
@[simp]
theorem summable_matrix_diagonal [DecidableEq n] {f : X → n → R} :
(Summable fun x => diagonal (f x)) ↔ Summable f :=
Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse (Matrix.diagonalAddMonoidHom n R) (Matrix.diagAddMonoidHom n R)
continuous_id.matrix_diagonal continuous_matrix_diag fun A => diag_diagonal A
#align summable_matrix_diagonal summable_matrix_diagonal
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/Matrix.lean | 357 | 363 | theorem Matrix.diagonal_tsum [DecidableEq n] [T2Space R] {f : X → n → R} :
diagonal (∑' x, f x) = ∑' x, diagonal (f x) := by |
by_cases hf : Summable f
· exact hf.hasSum.matrix_diagonal.tsum_eq.symm
· have hft := summable_matrix_diagonal.not.mpr hf
rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hft]
exact diagonal_zero
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Totient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Simple
import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
#align_import group_theory.specific_groups.cyclic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0f6670b8af2dff699de1c0b4b49039b31bc13c46"
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {a : α}
section Cyclic
attribute [local instance] setFintype
open Subgroup
class IsAddCyclic (α : Type u) [AddGroup α] : Prop where
exists_generator : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ AddSubgroup.zmultiples g
#align is_add_cyclic IsAddCyclic
@[to_additive]
class IsCyclic (α : Type u) [Group α] : Prop where
exists_generator : ∃ g : α, ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g
#align is_cyclic IsCyclic
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) isCyclic_of_subsingleton [Group α] [Subsingleton α] : IsCyclic α :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x 1]
exact mem_zpowers 1⟩⟩
#align is_cyclic_of_subsingleton isCyclic_of_subsingleton
#align is_add_cyclic_of_subsingleton isAddCyclic_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem isCyclic_multiplicative_iff [AddGroup α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) ↔ IsAddCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isCyclic_multiplicative [AddGroup α] [IsAddCyclic α] : IsCyclic (Multiplicative α) :=
isCyclic_multiplicative_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem isAddCyclic_additive_iff [Group α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) ↔ IsCyclic α :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩, fun H ↦ ⟨H.1⟩⟩
instance isAddCyclic_additive [Group α] [IsCyclic α] : IsAddCyclic (Additive α) :=
isAddCyclic_additive_iff.mpr inferInstance
@[to_additive
"A cyclic group is always commutative. This is not an `instance` because often we have
a better proof of `AddCommGroup`."]
def IsCyclic.commGroup [hg : Group α] [IsCyclic α] : CommGroup α :=
{ hg with
mul_comm := fun x y =>
let ⟨_, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := hg x
let ⟨_, hm⟩ := hg y
hm ▸ hn ▸ zpow_mul_comm _ _ _ }
#align is_cyclic.comm_group IsCyclic.commGroup
#align is_add_cyclic.add_comm_group IsAddCyclic.addCommGroup
variable [Group α]
@[to_additive "A non-cyclic additive group is non-trivial."]
theorem Nontrivial.of_not_isCyclic (nc : ¬IsCyclic α) : Nontrivial α := by
contrapose! nc
exact @isCyclic_of_subsingleton _ _ (not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.mp nc)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_cyclic {G : Type*} [Group G] [h : IsCyclic G] (σ : G →* G) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ g : G, σ g = g ^ m := by
obtain ⟨h, hG⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := G)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hG (σ h)
refine ⟨m, fun g => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hG g
rw [MonoidHom.map_zpow, ← hm, ← zpow_mul, ← zpow_mul']
#align monoid_hom.map_cyclic MonoidHom.map_cyclic
#align monoid_add_hom.map_add_cyclic AddMonoidHom.map_addCyclic
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias
MonoidAddHom.map_add_cyclic := AddMonoidHom.map_addCyclic
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card [Fintype α] (x : α) (hx : orderOf x = Fintype.card α) :
IsCyclic α := by
classical
use x
simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
rw [← Fintype.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α), ← Fintype.card_zpowers] at hx
exact Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (Set.subset_univ _) (ge_of_eq hx)
#align is_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card
#align is_add_cyclic_of_order_of_eq_card isAddCyclic_of_addOrderOf_eq_card
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")]
alias isAddCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card := isAddCyclic_of_addOrderOf_eq_card
@[to_additive]
theorem Subgroup.eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G}
(H : Subgroup G) [hp : Fact (Fintype.card G).Prime] : H = ⊥ ∨ H = ⊤ := by
classical
have := card_subgroup_dvd_card H
rwa [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card (α := G), Nat.dvd_prime hp.1, ← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
← eq_bot_iff_card, card_eq_iff_eq_top] at this
@[to_additive "Any non-identity element of a finite group of prime order generates the group."]
theorem zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Fintype.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : zpowers g = ⊤ := by
subst h
have := (zpowers g).eq_bot_or_eq_top_of_prime_card
rwa [zpowers_eq_bot, or_iff_right hg] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_zpowers_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ zpowers g := by
simp_rw [zpowers_eq_top_of_prime_card h hg, Subgroup.mem_top]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_powers_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card G = p) {g g' : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : g' ∈ Submonoid.powers g := by
rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg
@[to_additive]
theorem powers_eq_top_of_prime_card {G : Type*} [Group G] {_ : Fintype G} {p : ℕ}
[hp : Fact p.Prime] (h : Fintype.card G = p) {g : G} (hg : g ≠ 1) : Submonoid.powers g = ⊤ := by
ext x
simp [mem_powers_of_prime_card h hg]
@[to_additive "A finite group of prime order is cyclic."]
theorem isCyclic_of_prime_card {α : Type u} [Group α] [Fintype α] {p : ℕ} [hp : Fact p.Prime]
(h : Fintype.card α = p) : IsCyclic α := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g ≠ 1 := Fintype.exists_ne_of_one_lt_card (h.symm ▸ hp.1.one_lt) 1
exact ⟨g, fun g' ↦ mem_zpowers_of_prime_card h hg⟩
#align is_cyclic_of_prime_card isCyclic_of_prime_card
#align is_add_cyclic_of_prime_card isAddCyclic_of_prime_card
@[to_additive]
theorem isCyclic_of_surjective {H G F : Type*} [Group H] [Group G] [hH : IsCyclic H]
[FunLike F H G] [MonoidHomClass F H G] (f : F) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
IsCyclic G := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hH
refine ⟨f x, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hf a
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hx a
exact ⟨n, (map_zpow _ _ _).symm⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers [Fintype α] {g : α} (hx : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) :
orderOf g = Fintype.card α := by
classical
rw [← Fintype.card_zpowers]
apply Fintype.card_of_finset'
simpa using hx
#align order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers
#align add_order_of_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zmultiples addOrderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zmultiples
@[to_additive]
lemma orderOf_generator_eq_natCard (h : ∀ x, x ∈ Subgroup.zpowers a) : orderOf a = Nat.card α :=
Nat.card_zpowers a ▸ (Nat.card_congr <| Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv h)
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic {G : Type*} [Group G] [Fintype G] [G_cyclic : IsCyclic G]
{k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Fintype.card G) : ∃ a : G, a ^ k ≠ 1 := by
rcases G_cyclic with ⟨a, ha⟩
use a
contrapose! k_lt_card_G
convert orderOf_le_of_pow_eq_one k_pos.bot_lt k_lt_card_G
rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← Nat.card_zpowers, eq_comm, card_eq_iff_eq_top, eq_top_iff]
exact fun x _ ↦ ha x
@[to_additive]
theorem Infinite.orderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers [Infinite α] {g : α}
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ zpowers g) : orderOf g = 0 := by
classical
rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff']
refine fun n hn hgn => ?_
have ho := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, hn, hgn⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset
(Finset.image (fun x => g ^ x) <| Finset.range <| orderOf g)
apply hx
rw [← ho.mem_powers_iff_mem_range_orderOf, Submonoid.mem_powers_iff]
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := h x
dsimp at hk
obtain ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩ := k.eq_nat_or_neg
· exact ⟨k, mod_cast hk⟩
rw [← zpow_mod_orderOf] at hk
have : 0 ≤ (-k % orderOf g : ℤ) := Int.emod_nonneg (-k) (mod_cast ho.orderOf_pos.ne')
refine ⟨(-k % orderOf g : ℤ).toNat, ?_⟩
rwa [← zpow_natCast, Int.toNat_of_nonneg this]
#align infinite.order_of_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers Infinite.orderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zpowers
#align infinite.add_order_of_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zmultiples Infinite.addOrderOf_eq_zero_of_forall_mem_zmultiples
@[to_additive]
instance Bot.isCyclic {α : Type u} [Group α] : IsCyclic (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
⟨⟨1, fun x => ⟨0, Subtype.eq <| (zpow_zero (1 : α)).trans <| Eq.symm (Subgroup.mem_bot.1 x.2)⟩⟩⟩
#align bot.is_cyclic Bot.isCyclic
#align bot.is_add_cyclic Bot.isAddCyclic
@[to_additive]
instance Subgroup.isCyclic {α : Type u} [Group α] [IsCyclic α] (H : Subgroup α) : IsCyclic H :=
haveI := Classical.propDecidable
let ⟨g, hg⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := α)
if hx : ∃ x : α, x ∈ H ∧ x ≠ (1 : α) then
let ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := hx
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hex : ∃ n : ℕ, 0 < n ∧ g ^ n ∈ H :=
⟨k.natAbs,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun h => hx₂ <| by
rw [← hk, Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp h, zpow_zero], by
cases' k with k k
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natAbs_cast k, ← zpow_natCast, ← Int.ofNat_eq_coe, hk]
exact hx₁
· rw [Int.natAbs_negSucc, ← Subgroup.inv_mem_iff H]; simp_all⟩
⟨⟨⟨g ^ Nat.find hex, (Nat.find_spec hex).2⟩, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hg x
have hk : g ^ k = x := hk
have hk₂ : g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) ∈ H := by
rw [zpow_mul]
apply H.zpow_mem
exact mod_cast (Nat.find_spec hex).2
have hk₃ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex : ℤ) ∈ H :=
(Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right H hk₂).1 <| by
rw [← zpow_add, Int.emod_add_ediv, hk]; exact hx
have hk₄ : k % Nat.find hex = (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs := by
rw [Int.natAbs_of_nonneg
(Int.emod_nonneg _ (Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))]
have hk₅ : g ^ (k % Nat.find hex).natAbs ∈ H := by rwa [← zpow_natCast, ← hk₄]
have hk₆ : (k % (Nat.find hex : ℤ)).natAbs = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h =>
Nat.find_min hex
(Int.ofNat_lt.1 <| by
rw [← hk₄]; exact Int.emod_lt_of_pos _ (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.find_spec hex).1))
⟨Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h, hk₅⟩
⟨k / (Nat.find hex : ℤ),
Subtype.ext_iff_val.2
(by
suffices g ^ ((Nat.find hex : ℤ) * (k / Nat.find hex : ℤ)) = x by simpa [zpow_mul]
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel'
(Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero (Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp hk₆)),
hk])⟩⟩⟩
else by
have : H = (⊥ : Subgroup α) :=
Subgroup.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => by simp at *; tauto, fun h => by rw [Subgroup.mem_bot.1 h]; exact H.one_mem⟩
subst this; infer_instance
#align subgroup.is_cyclic Subgroup.isCyclic
#align add_subgroup.is_add_cyclic AddSubgroup.isAddCyclic
open Finset Nat
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.exists_monoid_generator [Finite α] [IsCyclic α] :
∃ x : α, ∀ y : α, y ∈ Submonoid.powers x := by
simp_rw [mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers]
exact IsCyclic.exists_generator
#align is_cyclic.exists_monoid_generator IsCyclic.exists_monoid_generator
#align is_add_cyclic.exists_add_monoid_generator IsAddCyclic.exists_addMonoid_generator
@[to_additive]
lemma IsCyclic.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard [h : IsCyclic α] : ∃ g : α, orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h.exists_generator
use g
rw [← card_zpowers g, (eq_top_iff' (zpowers g)).mpr hg]
exact Nat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[to_additive]
lemma isCyclic_iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard [Finite α] :
IsCyclic α ↔ ∃ g : α, orderOf g = Nat.card α := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ h.exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := h
cases nonempty_fintype α
refine isCyclic_of_orderOf_eq_card g ?_
simp [hg]
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-04-20"))]
protected alias IsCyclic.iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard_of_Fintype :=
isCyclic_iff_exists_ofOrder_eq_natCard
section
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.image_range_orderOf (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ zpowers a) :
Finset.image (fun i => a ^ i) (range (orderOf a)) = univ := by
simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe] at ha
simp only [_root_.image_range_orderOf, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.mpr ha, Set.toFinset_univ]
#align is_cyclic.image_range_order_of IsCyclic.image_range_orderOf
#align is_add_cyclic.image_range_order_of IsAddCyclic.image_range_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCyclic.image_range_card (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ zpowers a) :
Finset.image (fun i => a ^ i) (range (Fintype.card α)) = univ := by
rw [← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers ha, IsCyclic.image_range_orderOf ha]
#align is_cyclic.image_range_card IsCyclic.image_range_card
#align is_add_cyclic.image_range_card IsAddCyclic.image_range_card
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SpecificGroups/Cyclic.lean | 385 | 393 | theorem IsCyclic.unique_zpow_zmod (ha : ∀ x : α, x ∈ zpowers a) (x : α) :
∃! n : ZMod (Fintype.card α), x = a ^ n.val := by |
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := ha x
refine ⟨n, (?_ : a ^ n = _), fun y (hy : a ^ n = _) ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← zpow_natCast, zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers ha,
Int.modEq_comm, Int.modEq_iff_add_fac, ← ZMod.intCast_eq_iff]
· rw [← zpow_natCast, zpow_eq_zpow_iff_modEq, orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers ha,
← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff] at hy
simp [hy]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.well_known from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8199f6717c150a7fe91c4534175f4cf99725978f"
namespace PowerSeries
section Field
variable (A A' : Type*) [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A']
open Nat
def exp : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !)
#align power_series.exp PowerSeries.exp
def sin : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then 0 else algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !)
#align power_series.sin PowerSeries.sin
def cos : PowerSeries A :=
mk fun n => if Even n then algebraMap ℚ A ((-1) ^ (n / 2) / n !) else 0
#align power_series.cos PowerSeries.cos
variable {A A'} [Ring A] [Ring A'] [Algebra ℚ A] [Algebra ℚ A'] (n : ℕ) (f : A →+* A')
@[simp]
theorem coeff_exp : coeff A n (exp A) = algebraMap ℚ A (1 / n !) :=
coeff_mk _ _
#align power_series.coeff_exp PowerSeries.coeff_exp
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_exp : constantCoeff A (exp A) = 1 := by
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_exp]
simp
#align power_series.constant_coeff_exp PowerSeries.constantCoeff_exp
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sin_bit0 : coeff A (bit0 n) (sin A) = 0 := by
rw [sin, coeff_mk, if_pos (even_bit0 n)]
#align power_series.coeff_sin_bit0 PowerSeries.coeff_sin_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_sin_bit1 : coeff A (bit1 n) (sin A) = (-1) ^ n * coeff A (bit1 n) (exp A) := by
rw [sin, coeff_mk, if_neg n.not_even_bit1, Nat.bit1_div_two, ← mul_one_div, map_mul, map_pow,
map_neg, map_one, coeff_exp]
#align power_series.coeff_sin_bit1 PowerSeries.coeff_sin_bit1
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_cos_bit0 : coeff A (bit0 n) (cos A) = (-1) ^ n * coeff A (bit0 n) (exp A) := by
rw [cos, coeff_mk, if_pos (even_bit0 n), Nat.bit0_div_two, ← mul_one_div, map_mul, map_pow,
map_neg, map_one, coeff_exp]
#align power_series.coeff_cos_bit0 PowerSeries.coeff_cos_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/WellKnown.lean | 201 | 202 | theorem coeff_cos_bit1 : coeff A (bit1 n) (cos A) = 0 := by |
rw [cos, coeff_mk, if_neg n.not_even_bit1]
|
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
#align nat.Inf_def Nat.sInf_def
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
#align nat.Sup_def Nat.sSup_def
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
#align set.infinite.nat.Sup_eq_zero Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 50 | 55 | theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by |
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, iff_true_iff, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false_iff, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
variable [MeasurableSpace β] {x : α} {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
open EMetric
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_eball : MeasurableSet (EMetric.ball x ε) :=
EMetric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet
#align measurable_set_eball measurableSet_eball
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_edist_right : Measurable (edist x) :=
(continuous_const.edist continuous_id).measurable
#align measurable_edist_right measurable_edist_right
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_edist_left : Measurable fun y => edist y x :=
(continuous_id.edist continuous_const).measurable
#align measurable_edist_left measurable_edist_left
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_infEdist {s : Set α} : Measurable fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_infEdist.measurable
#align measurable_inf_edist measurable_infEdist
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.infEdist {f : β → α} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
Measurable fun x => infEdist (f x) s :=
measurable_infEdist.comp hf
#align measurable.inf_edist Measurable.infEdist
open Metric EMetric
theorem tendsto_measure_cthickening {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : ∃ R > 0, μ (cthickening R s) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun r => μ (cthickening r s)) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 (μ (closure s))) := by
have A : Tendsto (fun r => μ (cthickening r s)) (𝓝[Ioi 0] 0) (𝓝 (μ (closure s))) := by
rw [closure_eq_iInter_cthickening]
exact
tendsto_measure_biInter_gt (fun r _ => isClosed_cthickening.measurableSet)
(fun i j _ ij => cthickening_mono ij _) hs
have B : Tendsto (fun r => μ (cthickening r s)) (𝓝[Iic 0] 0) (𝓝 (μ (closure s))) := by
apply Tendsto.congr' _ tendsto_const_nhds
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (α := ℝ)] with _ hr
rw [cthickening_of_nonpos hr]
convert B.sup A
exact (nhds_left_sup_nhds_right' 0).symm
#align tendsto_measure_cthickening tendsto_measure_cthickening
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Metric.lean | 159 | 163 | theorem tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(hs : ∃ R > 0, μ (cthickening R s) ≠ ∞) (h's : IsClosed s) :
Tendsto (fun r => μ (cthickening r s)) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 (μ s)) := by |
convert tendsto_measure_cthickening hs
exact h's.closure_eq.symm
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Liouville.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Irrational
#align_import number_theory.liouville.liouville_with from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
open Filter Metric Real Set
open scoped Filter Topology
def LiouvilleWith (p x : ℝ) : Prop :=
∃ C, ∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, ∃ m : ℤ, x ≠ m / n ∧ |x - m / n| < C / n ^ p
#align liouville_with LiouvilleWith
theorem liouvilleWith_one (x : ℝ) : LiouvilleWith 1 x := by
use 2
refine ((eventually_gt_atTop 0).mono fun n hn => ?_).frequently
have hn' : (0 : ℝ) < n := by simpa
have : x < ↑(⌊x * ↑n⌋ + 1) / ↑n := by
rw [lt_div_iff hn', Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one];
exact Int.lt_floor_add_one _
refine ⟨⌊x * n⌋ + 1, this.ne, ?_⟩
rw [abs_sub_comm, abs_of_pos (sub_pos.2 this), rpow_one, sub_lt_iff_lt_add',
add_div_eq_mul_add_div _ _ hn'.ne']
gcongr
calc _ ≤ x * n + 1 := by push_cast; gcongr; apply Int.floor_le
_ < x * n + 2 := by linarith
#align liouville_with_one liouvilleWith_one
namespace LiouvilleWith
variable {p q x y : ℝ} {r : ℚ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ}
theorem exists_pos (h : LiouvilleWith p x) :
∃ (C : ℝ) (_h₀ : 0 < C),
∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, 1 ≤ n ∧ ∃ m : ℤ, x ≠ m / n ∧ |x - m / n| < C / n ^ p := by
rcases h with ⟨C, hC⟩
refine ⟨max C 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le <| le_max_right _ _, ?_⟩
refine ((eventually_ge_atTop 1).and_frequently hC).mono ?_
rintro n ⟨hle, m, hne, hlt⟩
refine ⟨hle, m, hne, hlt.trans_le ?_⟩
gcongr
apply le_max_left
#align liouville_with.exists_pos LiouvilleWith.exists_pos
theorem mono (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hle : q ≤ p) : LiouvilleWith q x := by
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨C, hC.mono ?_⟩; rintro n ⟨hn, m, hne, hlt⟩
refine ⟨m, hne, hlt.trans_le <| ?_⟩
gcongr
exact_mod_cast hn
#align liouville_with.mono LiouvilleWith.mono
theorem frequently_lt_rpow_neg (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hlt : q < p) :
∃ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, ∃ m : ℤ, x ≠ m / n ∧ |x - m / n| < n ^ (-q) := by
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, _hC₀, hC⟩
have : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, C < n ^ (p - q) := by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), neg_sub, one_div] using
((tendsto_rpow_atTop (sub_pos.2 hlt)).comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop).eventually
(eventually_gt_atTop C)
refine (this.and_frequently hC).mono ?_
rintro n ⟨hnC, hn, m, hne, hlt⟩
replace hn : (0 : ℝ) < n := Nat.cast_pos.2 hn
refine ⟨m, hne, hlt.trans <| (div_lt_iff <| rpow_pos_of_pos hn _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [mul_comm, ← rpow_add hn, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align liouville_with.frequently_lt_rpow_neg LiouvilleWith.frequently_lt_rpow_neg
theorem mul_rat (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hr : r ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (x * r) := by
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, _hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨r.den ^ p * (|r| * C), (tendsto_id.nsmul_atTop r.pos).frequently (hC.mono ?_)⟩
rintro n ⟨_hn, m, hne, hlt⟩
have A : (↑(r.num * m) : ℝ) / ↑(r.den • id n) = m / n * r := by
simp [← div_mul_div_comm, ← r.cast_def, mul_comm]
refine ⟨r.num * m, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [A]; simp [hne, hr]
· rw [A, ← sub_mul, abs_mul]
simp only [smul_eq_mul, id, Nat.cast_mul]
calc _ < C / ↑n ^ p * |↑r| := by gcongr
_ = ↑r.den ^ p * (↑|r| * C) / (↑r.den * ↑n) ^ p := ?_
rw [mul_rpow, mul_div_mul_left, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc]
· simp only [Rat.cast_abs, le_refl]
all_goals positivity
#align liouville_with.mul_rat LiouvilleWith.mul_rat
theorem mul_rat_iff (hr : r ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (x * r) ↔ LiouvilleWith p x :=
⟨fun h => by
simpa only [mul_assoc, ← Rat.cast_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr, Rat.cast_one, mul_one] using
h.mul_rat (inv_ne_zero hr),
fun h => h.mul_rat hr⟩
#align liouville_with.mul_rat_iff LiouvilleWith.mul_rat_iff
theorem rat_mul_iff (hr : r ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (r * x) ↔ LiouvilleWith p x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_rat_iff hr]
#align liouville_with.rat_mul_iff LiouvilleWith.rat_mul_iff
theorem rat_mul (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hr : r ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (r * x) :=
(rat_mul_iff hr).2 h
#align liouville_with.rat_mul LiouvilleWith.rat_mul
theorem mul_int_iff (hm : m ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (x * m) ↔ LiouvilleWith p x := by
rw [← Rat.cast_intCast, mul_rat_iff (Int.cast_ne_zero.2 hm)]
#align liouville_with.mul_int_iff LiouvilleWith.mul_int_iff
theorem mul_int (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hm : m ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (x * m) :=
(mul_int_iff hm).2 h
#align liouville_with.mul_int LiouvilleWith.mul_int
theorem int_mul_iff (hm : m ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (m * x) ↔ LiouvilleWith p x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_int_iff hm]
#align liouville_with.int_mul_iff LiouvilleWith.int_mul_iff
theorem int_mul (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hm : m ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (m * x) :=
(int_mul_iff hm).2 h
#align liouville_with.int_mul LiouvilleWith.int_mul
theorem mul_nat_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (x * n) ↔ LiouvilleWith p x := by
rw [← Rat.cast_natCast, mul_rat_iff (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn)]
#align liouville_with.mul_nat_iff LiouvilleWith.mul_nat_iff
theorem mul_nat (h : LiouvilleWith p x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (x * n) :=
(mul_nat_iff hn).2 h
#align liouville_with.mul_nat LiouvilleWith.mul_nat
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Liouville/LiouvilleWith.lean | 174 | 175 | theorem nat_mul_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : LiouvilleWith p (n * x) ↔ LiouvilleWith p x := by |
rw [mul_comm, mul_nat_iff hn]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 289 | 289 | theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by | rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
#align_import topology.urysohns_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Urysohns
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
structure CU {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] (P : Set X → Prop) where
protected C : Set X
protected U : Set X
protected P_C : P C
protected closed_C : IsClosed C
protected open_U : IsOpen U
protected subset : C ⊆ U
protected hP : ∀ {c u : Set X}, IsClosed c → P c → IsOpen u → c ⊆ u →
∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ c ⊆ v ∧ closure v ⊆ u ∧ P (closure v)
#align urysohns.CU Urysohns.CU
namespace CU
variable {P : Set X → Prop}
@[simps C]
def left (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := c.C
U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
closed_C := c.closed_C
P_C := c.P_C
open_U := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.1
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.left Urysohns.CU.left
@[simps U]
def right (c : CU P) : CU P where
C := closure (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose
U := c.U
closed_C := isClosed_closure
P_C := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.2
open_U := c.open_U
subset := (c.hP c.closed_C c.P_C c.open_U c.subset).choose_spec.2.2.1
hP := c.hP
#align urysohns.CU.right Urysohns.CU.right
theorem left_U_subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.right.C :=
subset_closure
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset_right_C
theorem left_U_subset (c : CU P) : c.left.U ⊆ c.U :=
Subset.trans c.left_U_subset_right_C c.right.subset
#align urysohns.CU.left_U_subset Urysohns.CU.left_U_subset
theorem subset_right_C (c : CU P) : c.C ⊆ c.right.C :=
Subset.trans c.left.subset c.left_U_subset_right_C
#align urysohns.CU.subset_right_C Urysohns.CU.subset_right_C
noncomputable def approx : ℕ → CU P → X → ℝ
| 0, c, x => indicator c.Uᶜ 1 x
| n + 1, c, x => midpoint ℝ (approx n c.left x) (approx n c.right x)
#align urysohns.CU.approx Urysohns.CU.approx
theorem approx_of_mem_C (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∈ c.C) : c.approx n x = 0 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_of_not_mem (fun (hU : x ∈ c.Uᶜ) => hU <| c.subset hx) _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [c.subset_right_C hx, hx]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_of_mem_C Urysohns.CU.approx_of_mem_C
theorem approx_of_nmem_U (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) {x : X} (hx : x ∉ c.U) : c.approx n x = 1 := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· rw [← mem_compl_iff] at hx
exact indicator_of_mem hx _
· simp only [approx]
rw [ihn, ihn, midpoint_self]
exacts [hx, fun hU => hx <| c.left_U_subset hU]
#align urysohns.CU.approx_of_nmem_U Urysohns.CU.approx_of_nmem_U
| Mathlib/Topology/UrysohnsLemma.lean | 178 | 182 | theorem approx_nonneg (c : CU P) (n : ℕ) (x : X) : 0 ≤ c.approx n x := by |
induction' n with n ihn generalizing c
· exact indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
· simp only [approx, midpoint_eq_smul_add, invOf_eq_inv]
refine mul_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 zero_le_two) (add_nonneg ?_ ?_) <;> apply ihn
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ImageToKernel
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomologicalComplex
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GradedObject
#align_import algebra.homology.homology from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"618ea3d5c99240cd7000d8376924906a148bf9ff"
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} (C : HomologicalComplex V c)
open scoped Classical
open ZeroObject
noncomputable section
namespace HomologicalComplex
section Cycles
variable [HasKernels V]
abbrev cycles' (i : ι) : Subobject (C.X i) :=
kernelSubobject (C.dFrom i)
#align homological_complex.cycles HomologicalComplex.cycles'
theorem cycles'_eq_kernelSubobject {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) :
C.cycles' i = kernelSubobject (C.d i j) :=
C.kernel_from_eq_kernel r
#align homological_complex.cycles_eq_kernel_subobject HomologicalComplex.cycles'_eq_kernelSubobject
def cycles'IsoKernel {i j : ι} (r : c.Rel i j) : (C.cycles' i : V) ≅ kernel (C.d i j) :=
Subobject.isoOfEq _ _ (C.cycles'_eq_kernelSubobject r) ≪≫ kernelSubobjectIso (C.d i j)
#align homological_complex.cycles_iso_kernel HomologicalComplex.cycles'IsoKernel
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Homology.lean | 68 | 71 | theorem cycles_eq_top {i} (h : ¬c.Rel i (c.next i)) : C.cycles' i = ⊤ := by |
rw [eq_top_iff]
apply le_kernelSubobject
rw [C.dFrom_eq_zero h, comp_zero]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
#align_import data.set.ncard from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74c2af38a828107941029b03839882c5c6f87a04"
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := PartENat.withTopEquiv (PartENat.card s)
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, PartENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = PartENat.withTopEquiv (PartENat.card α) := by
rw [encard, PartENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, PartENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card,
PartENat.withTopEquiv_natCast, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) : encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ← PartENat.withTopEquiv.symm.injective.eq_iff, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
PartENat.withTopEquiv_symm_top, PartENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ← PartENat.withTopEquiv.symm.injective.eq_iff, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
PartENat.withTopEquiv_symm_zero, PartENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype,
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ← PartENat.withTopEquiv.symm.injective.eq_iff, Equiv.symm_apply_apply,
PartENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]; rfl
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
have e := (Equiv.Set.union (by rwa [subset_empty_iff, ← disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty])).symm
simp [encard, ← PartENat.card_congr e, PartENat.card_sum, PartENat.withTopEquiv]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
refine h.induction_on (by simp) ?_
rintro a t hat _ ht'
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_card (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_card
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_cancel_iff h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 189 | 190 | theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by |
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle EuclideanGeometry.oangle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (o.continuousAt_oangle hf1 hf2).comp ((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_oangle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left_right
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3)).toEquiv]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affine_independent EuclideanGeometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.affine_independent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vector_span_eq EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_swap EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_swap
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_cyc3 EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_cyc3
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_right_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_left_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_to_real EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
#align euclidean_geometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rotate_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rotate_sign
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
#align sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
#align sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
#align wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
#align wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
by_cases hp₁'p₂ : p₁' = p₂; · rw [hp₁'p₂, wbtw_self_iff] at h; exact False.elim (hp₁p₂ h)
rw [← oangle_add hp₁'p₂ hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, h.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero, zero_add]
#align wbtw.oangle_eq_left Wbtw.oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_left h.ne_left
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_left Sbtw.oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by rw [oangle_rev, h.oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂, ← oangle_rev]
#align wbtw.oangle_eq_right Wbtw.oangle_eq_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_right h.ne_left
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_left
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₁) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_left]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₃ p₂) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₃ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_right
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₃) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_right]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
{p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi, oangle_add_swap h.left_ne h.right_ne hp₃p₂]
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
{p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi, oangle_add hp₁p₂ h.right_ne h.left_ne]
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h₁ : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁')
(h₃ : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃' := by
rw [h₁.oangle_eq_add_pi_left h₃.left_ne, h₃.oangle_eq_add_pi_right h₁.right_ne, add_assoc,
Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, add_zero]
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁'} : Set P)) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁'p₂ : p₁' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rcases h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw with (hw | hw | hw)
· have hw' : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁' := ⟨hw, hp₁p₂.symm, hp₁'p₂.symm⟩
rw [hw'.oangle_eq_add_pi_left hp₃p₂, smul_add, Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi, add_zero]
· rw [hw.oangle_eq_left hp₁'p₂]
· rw [hw.symm.oangle_eq_left hp₁p₂]
#align collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₃, p₂, p₃'} : Set P)) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) (hp₃'p₂ : p₃' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by
rw [oangle_rev, smul_neg, h.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂ hp₃'p₂, ← smul_neg, ← oangle_rev]
#align collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint {p₁ p₂ p : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p = dist p₂ p ↔
∃ r : ℝ, r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ = p := by
refine ⟨fun hd => ?_, fun hr => ?_⟩
· have hi : ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, p -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, ←
mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm] at hd
simp_rw [vsub_midpoint, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₁ p, inner_sub_left, inner_add_right,
inner_smul_right, hd, real_inner_comm (p -ᵥ p₁)]
abel
rw [@Orientation.inner_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two V _ _ _ o,
or_iff_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 h.symm)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [eq_comm, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hr
exact ⟨r, hr.symm⟩
· rcases hr with ⟨r, rfl⟩
simp_rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, left_vsub_midpoint, right_vsub_midpoint,
invOf_eq_inv, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, ← mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_sub_self]
simp [-neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint
open AffineSubspace
theorem _root_.Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (p₅ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) (hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P))
(hr : SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) (p₄ -ᵥ p₃)) : (∡ p₁ p₅ p₂).sign = (∡ p₃ p₅ p₄).sign := by
by_cases hc₅₁₂ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂} : Set P)
· have hc₅₁₂₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)) hp₁p₂).2 hc₅₁₂
have hc₅₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _
(Set.mem_singleton _)))) hp₃p₄).1 hc₅₁₂₃₄
rw [Set.insert_comm] at hc₅₁₂ hc₅₃₄
have hs₁₅₂ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₁₂
have hs₃₅₄ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₃₄
rw [← Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at hs₁₅₂ hs₃₅₄
rw [hs₁₅₂, hs₃₅₄]
· let s : Set (P × P × P) :=
(fun x : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] × V => (x.1, p₅, x.2 +ᵥ (x.1 : P))) ''
Set.univ ×ˢ {v | SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) v ∧ v ≠ 0}
have hco : IsConnected s :=
haveI : ConnectedSpace line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] := AddTorsor.connectedSpace _ _
(isConnected_univ.prod (isConnected_setOf_sameRay_and_ne_zero
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm))).image _
(continuous_fst.subtype_val.prod_mk (continuous_const.prod_mk
(continuous_snd.vadd continuous_fst.subtype_val))).continuousOn
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) s := by
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff, Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, -⟩ := hv
rintro rfl
refine hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan ?_).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))
· exact hq
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ s → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff,
Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, hv0⟩ := hv
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
change q ∈ line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] at hq
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
refine affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem ?_ hq
(fun h => hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan h).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))) ?_
· rwa [← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self, zero_sub, neg_ne_zero]
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hp₁p₂s : (p₁, p₅, p₂) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₁, left_mem_affineSpan_pair ℝ _ _⟩, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟩,
⟨SameRay.rfl, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
have hp₃p₄s : (p₃, p₅, p₄) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₃, hc.mem_affineSpan_of_mem_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))) hp₁p₂⟩, p₄ -ᵥ p₃⟩,
⟨hr, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃p₄.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hco hf hsp hp₃p₄s hp₁p₂s
#align collinear.oangle_sign_of_same_ray_vsub Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by simpa using h.wbtw.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ h.left_ne h.ne_right h.wbtw.sameRay_vsub
#align sbtw.oangle_sign_eq Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₁ ≠ p₂) : (∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁, p₃} : Set P) := by
simpa [Set.insert_comm p₂] using h.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ hne (h.left_ne_right_of_ne_left hne.symm) h.sameRay_vsub_left
#align wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ h.left_ne
#align sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 794 | 796 | theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₂ ≠ p₃) : (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign := by |
simp_rw [oangle_rev p₃, Real.Angle.sign_neg, h.symm.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ hne.symm]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LocalExtr.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Rolle
#align_import analysis.calculus.local_extr from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
open Set Filter Topology
variable {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b l : ℝ}
theorem exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero (hab : a < b) (hfc : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b)
(hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, f' c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_isLocalExtr_Ioo hab hfc hfI
⟨c, cmem, hc.hasDerivAt_eq_zero <| hff' c cmem⟩
#align exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero
theorem exists_deriv_eq_zero (hab : a < b) (hfc : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, deriv f c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_isLocalExtr_Ioo hab hfc hfI
⟨c, cmem, hc.deriv_eq_zero⟩
#align exists_deriv_eq_zero exists_deriv_eq_zero
theorem exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero' (hab : a < b) (hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 l))
(hfb : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 l)) (hff' : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (f' x) x) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, f' c = 0 :=
let ⟨c, cmem, hc⟩ := exists_isLocalExtr_Ioo_of_tendsto hab
(fun x hx ↦ (hff' x hx).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) hfa hfb
⟨c, cmem, hc.hasDerivAt_eq_zero <| hff' c cmem⟩
#align exists_has_deriv_at_eq_zero' exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LocalExtr/Rolle.lean | 78 | 84 | theorem exists_deriv_eq_zero' (hab : a < b) (hfa : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 l))
(hfb : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] b) (𝓝 l)) : ∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, deriv f c = 0 := by |
by_cases h : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, DifferentiableAt ℝ f x
· exact exists_hasDerivAt_eq_zero' hab hfa hfb fun x hx => (h x hx).hasDerivAt
· obtain ⟨c, hc, hcdiff⟩ : ∃ x ∈ Ioo a b, ¬DifferentiableAt ℝ f x := by
push_neg at h; exact h
exact ⟨c, hc, deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt hcdiff⟩
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.restrict
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst : Limits.pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map pullback.snd.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.pullback_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.presieve.pullback_compatible_iff CategoryTheory.Presieve.pullbackCompatible_iff
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend
theorem extend_agrees {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : R f) :
x.sieveExtend f (le_generate R Y hf) = x f hf := by
have h := (le_generate R Y hf).choose_spec
unfold FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
rw [t h.choose (𝟙 _) _ hf _]
· simp
· rw [id_comp]
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
#align category_theory.presieve.extend_agrees CategoryTheory.Presieve.extend_agrees
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.restrict (le_generate R) = x := by
funext Y f hf
exact extend_agrees t hf
#align category_theory.presieve.restrict_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.restrict_extend
def FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y Z⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (hf), x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible
theorem compatible_iff_sieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
x.Compatible ↔ x.SieveCompatible := by
constructor
· intro h Y Z f g hf
simpa using h (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
· intro h Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ k
simp_rw [← h f₁ g₁ h₁, ← h f₂ g₂ h₂]
congr
#align category_theory.presieve.compatible_iff_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible {x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)}
(t : x.Compatible) : x.SieveCompatible :=
(compatible_iff_sieveCompatible x).1 t
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.to_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible
@[simp]
theorem extend_restrict {x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R)} (t : x.Compatible) :
(x.restrict (le_generate R)).sieveExtend = x := by
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at t
funext _ _ h
apply (t _ _ _).symm.trans
congr
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
#align category_theory.presieve.extend_restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.extend_restrict
theorem restrict_inj {x₁ x₂ : FamilyOfElements P (generate R)} (t₁ : x₁.Compatible)
(t₂ : x₂.Compatible) : x₁.restrict (le_generate R) = x₂.restrict (le_generate R) → x₁ = x₂ :=
fun h => by
rw [← extend_restrict t₁, ← extend_restrict t₂]
-- Porting note: congr fails to make progress
apply congr_arg
exact h
#align category_theory.presieve.restrict_inj CategoryTheory.Presieve.restrict_inj
@[simps]
noncomputable def compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible :
{ x : FamilyOfElements P R // x.Compatible } ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.sieveExtend, x.2.sieveExtend⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1.restrict (le_generate R), x.2.restrict _⟩
left_inv x := Subtype.ext (restrict_extend x.2)
right_inv x := Subtype.ext (extend_restrict x.2)
#align category_theory.presieve.compatible_equiv_generate_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible
theorem FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible (S : Sieve X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : S f) {Z} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf) := by
simpa using t (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_of_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible
section FunctorPullback
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C) {Z : D}
variable {T : Presieve (F.obj Z)} {x : FamilyOfElements P T}
def FamilyOfElements.functorPullback (x : FamilyOfElements P T) :
FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) (T.functorPullback F) := fun _ f hf => x (F.map f) hf
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.functor_pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.functorPullback
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 300 | 303 | theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback (h : x.Compatible) :
(x.functorPullback F).Compatible := by |
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
exact h (F.map g₁) (F.map g₂) h₁ h₂ (by simp only [← F.map_comp, eq])
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 362 | 362 | theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by | rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
#align_import linear_algebra.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"13bce9a6b6c44f6b4c91ac1c1d2a816e2533d395"
noncomputable section
universe u
open Function Set Submodule
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M' M'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
section Module
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
section
variable (ι R M)
structure Basis where
ofRepr ::
repr : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R
#align basis Basis
#align basis.repr Basis.repr
#align basis.of_repr Basis.ofRepr
end
instance uniqueBasis [Subsingleton R] : Unique (Basis ι R M) :=
⟨⟨⟨default⟩⟩, fun ⟨b⟩ => by rw [Subsingleton.elim b]⟩
#align unique_basis uniqueBasis
namespace Basis
instance : Inhabited (Basis ι R (ι →₀ R)) :=
⟨.ofRepr (LinearEquiv.refl _ _)⟩
variable (b b₁ : Basis ι R M) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M)
section repr
theorem repr_injective : Injective (repr : Basis ι R M → M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) := fun f g h => by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align basis.repr_injective Basis.repr_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Basis ι R M) ι M where
coe b i := b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i 1)
coe_injective' f g h := repr_injective <| LinearEquiv.symm_bijective.injective <|
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| by ext; exact congr_fun h _
#align basis.fun_like Basis.instFunLike
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofRepr (e : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) : ⇑(ofRepr e) = fun i => e.symm (Finsupp.single i 1) :=
rfl
#align basis.coe_of_repr Basis.coe_ofRepr
protected theorem injective [Nontrivial R] : Injective b :=
b.repr.symm.injective.comp fun _ _ => (Finsupp.single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : R) ≠ 0)).mp
#align basis.injective Basis.injective
theorem repr_symm_single_one : b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i 1) = b i :=
rfl
#align basis.repr_symm_single_one Basis.repr_symm_single_one
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basis.lean | 137 | 141 | theorem repr_symm_single : b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i c) = c • b i :=
calc
b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i c) = b.repr.symm (c • Finsupp.single i (1 : R)) := by |
{ rw [Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one] }
_ = c • b i := by rw [LinearEquiv.map_smul, repr_symm_single_one]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
#align_import probability.probability_mass_function.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ac69b290818724c159de091daa3acd31da0ee6d"
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
def PMF.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
{ f : α → ℝ≥0∞ // HasSum f 1 }
#align pmf PMF
namespace PMF
instance instFunLike : FunLike (PMF α) α ℝ≥0∞ where
coe p a := p.1 a
coe_injective' _ _ h := Subtype.eq h
#align pmf.fun_like PMF.instFunLike
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {p q : PMF α} (h : ∀ x, p x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
#align pmf.ext PMF.ext
theorem ext_iff {p q : PMF α} : p = q ↔ ∀ x, p x = q x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align pmf.ext_iff PMF.ext_iff
theorem hasSum_coe_one (p : PMF α) : HasSum p 1 :=
p.2
#align pmf.has_sum_coe_one PMF.hasSum_coe_one
@[simp]
theorem tsum_coe (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a = 1 :=
p.hasSum_coe_one.tsum_eq
#align pmf.tsum_coe PMF.tsum_coe
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top (p : PMF α) : ∑' a, p a ≠ ∞ :=
p.tsum_coe.symm ▸ ENNReal.one_ne_top
#align pmf.tsum_coe_ne_top PMF.tsum_coe_ne_top
theorem tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top (p : PMF α) (s : Set α) : ∑' a, s.indicator p a ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt
(tsum_le_tsum (fun _ => Set.indicator_apply_le fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable)
(lt_of_le_of_ne le_top p.tsum_coe_ne_top))
#align pmf.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top PMF.tsum_coe_indicator_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_zero (p : PMF α) : ⇑p ≠ 0 := fun hp =>
zero_ne_one ((tsum_zero.symm.trans (tsum_congr fun x => symm (congr_fun hp x))).trans p.tsum_coe)
#align pmf.coe_ne_zero PMF.coe_ne_zero
def support (p : PMF α) : Set α :=
Function.support p
#align pmf.support PMF.support
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : a ∈ p.support ↔ p a ≠ 0 := Iff.rfl
#align pmf.mem_support_iff PMF.mem_support_iff
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty (p : PMF α) : p.support.Nonempty :=
Function.support_nonempty_iff.2 p.coe_ne_zero
#align pmf.support_nonempty PMF.support_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem support_countable (p : PMF α) : p.support.Countable :=
Summable.countable_support_ennreal (tsum_coe_ne_top p)
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Basic.lean | 107 | 108 | theorem apply_eq_zero_iff (p : PMF α) (a : α) : p a = 0 ↔ a ∉ p.support := by |
rw [mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not]
|
import Mathlib.Tactic.Qify
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.DiophantineApproximation
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pell from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7ad820c4997738e2f542f8a20f32911f52020e26"
namespace Pell
open Zsqrtd
theorem is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary {d : ℤ} {a : ℤ√d} :
a.re ^ 2 - d * a.im ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a ∈ unitary (ℤ√d) := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff_mem_unitary, norm_def, sq, sq, ← mul_assoc]
#align pell.is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary Pell.is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary
-- We use `solution₁ d` to allow for a more general structure `solution d m` that
-- encodes solutions to `x^2 - d*y^2 = m` to be added later.
def Solution₁ (d : ℤ) : Type :=
↥(unitary (ℤ√d))
#align pell.solution₁ Pell.Solution₁
namespace Solution₁
variable {d : ℤ}
-- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020): manual deriving
instance instCommGroup : CommGroup (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (CommGroup (unitary (ℤ√d)))
#align pell.solution₁.comm_group Pell.Solution₁.instCommGroup
instance instHasDistribNeg : HasDistribNeg (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (HasDistribNeg (unitary (ℤ√d)))
#align pell.solution₁.has_distrib_neg Pell.Solution₁.instHasDistribNeg
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (Solution₁ d) :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (unitary (ℤ√d)))
#align pell.solution₁.inhabited Pell.Solution₁.instInhabited
instance : Coe (Solution₁ d) (ℤ√d) where coe := Subtype.val
protected def x (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).re
#align pell.solution₁.x Pell.Solution₁.x
protected def y (a : Solution₁ d) : ℤ :=
(a : ℤ√d).im
#align pell.solution₁.y Pell.Solution₁.y
theorem prop (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 - d * a.y ^ 2 = 1 :=
is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mpr a.property
#align pell.solution₁.prop Pell.Solution₁.prop
theorem prop_x (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x ^ 2 = 1 + d * a.y ^ 2 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
#align pell.solution₁.prop_x Pell.Solution₁.prop_x
theorem prop_y (a : Solution₁ d) : d * a.y ^ 2 = a.x ^ 2 - 1 := by rw [← a.prop]; ring
#align pell.solution₁.prop_y Pell.Solution₁.prop_y
@[ext]
theorem ext {a b : Solution₁ d} (hx : a.x = b.x) (hy : a.y = b.y) : a = b :=
Subtype.ext <| Zsqrtd.ext _ _ hx hy
#align pell.solution₁.ext Pell.Solution₁.ext
def mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : Solution₁ d where
val := ⟨x, y⟩
property := is_pell_solution_iff_mem_unitary.mp prop
#align pell.solution₁.mk Pell.Solution₁.mk
@[simp]
theorem x_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).x = x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_mk Pell.Solution₁.x_mk
@[simp]
theorem y_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (mk x y prop).y = y :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_mk Pell.Solution₁.y_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (x y : ℤ) (prop : x ^ 2 - d * y ^ 2 = 1) : (↑(mk x y prop) : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, y⟩ :=
Zsqrtd.ext _ _ (x_mk x y prop) (y_mk x y prop)
#align pell.solution₁.coe_mk Pell.Solution₁.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem x_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).x = 1 :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_one Pell.Solution₁.x_one
@[simp]
theorem y_one : (1 : Solution₁ d).y = 0 :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_one Pell.Solution₁.y_one
@[simp]
theorem x_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).x = a.x * b.x + d * (a.y * b.y) := by
rw [← mul_assoc]
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_mul Pell.Solution₁.x_mul
@[simp]
theorem y_mul (a b : Solution₁ d) : (a * b).y = a.x * b.y + a.y * b.x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_mul Pell.Solution₁.y_mul
@[simp]
theorem x_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.x = a.x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_inv Pell.Solution₁.x_inv
@[simp]
theorem y_inv (a : Solution₁ d) : a⁻¹.y = -a.y :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_inv Pell.Solution₁.y_inv
@[simp]
theorem x_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).x = -a.x :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.x_neg Pell.Solution₁.x_neg
@[simp]
theorem y_neg (a : Solution₁ d) : (-a).y = -a.y :=
rfl
#align pell.solution₁.y_neg Pell.Solution₁.y_neg
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Pell.lean | 209 | 214 | theorem eq_zero_of_d_neg (h₀ : d < 0) (a : Solution₁ d) : a.x = 0 ∨ a.y = 0 := by |
have h := a.prop
contrapose! h
have h1 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.1
have h2 := sq_pos_of_ne_zero h.2
nlinarith
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Completion
#align_import analysis.normed.group.hom_completion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"17ef379e997badd73e5eabb4d38f11919ab3c4b3"
noncomputable section
open Set NormedAddGroupHom UniformSpace
section Completion
variable {G : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] {H : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup H]
{K : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup K]
def NormedAddGroupHom.completion (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
NormedAddGroupHom (Completion G) (Completion H) :=
.ofLipschitz (f.toAddMonoidHom.completion f.continuous) f.lipschitz.completion_map
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion NormedAddGroupHom.completion
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (x : Completion G) :
f.completion x = Completion.map f x :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_def NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
(f.completion : Completion G → Completion H) = Completion.map f := rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_coe_to_fun NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun
-- Porting note: `@[simp]` moved to the next lemma
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (g : G) :
f.completion g = f g :=
Completion.map_coe f.uniformContinuous _
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_coe NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe' (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (g : G) :
Completion.map f g = f g :=
f.completion_coe g
@[simps]
def normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom :
NormedAddGroupHom G H →+ NormedAddGroupHom (Completion G) (Completion H) where
toFun := NormedAddGroupHom.completion
map_zero' := toAddMonoidHom_injective AddMonoidHom.completion_zero
map_add' f g := toAddMonoidHom_injective <|
f.toAddMonoidHom.completion_add g.toAddMonoidHom f.continuous g.continuous
#align normed_add_group_hom_completion_hom normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom
#align normed_add_group_hom_completion_hom_apply normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_id :
(NormedAddGroupHom.id G).completion = NormedAddGroupHom.id (Completion G) := by
ext x
rw [NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def, NormedAddGroupHom.coe_id, Completion.map_id]
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_id NormedAddGroupHom.completion_id
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_comp (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (g : NormedAddGroupHom H K) :
g.completion.comp f.completion = (g.comp f).completion := by
ext x
rw [NormedAddGroupHom.coe_comp, NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def,
NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun, NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun,
Completion.map_comp g.uniformContinuous f.uniformContinuous]
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_comp NormedAddGroupHom.completion_comp
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_neg (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
(-f).completion = -f.completion :=
map_neg (normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom : NormedAddGroupHom G H →+ _) f
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_neg NormedAddGroupHom.completion_neg
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_add (f g : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
(f + g).completion = f.completion + g.completion :=
normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom.map_add f g
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_add NormedAddGroupHom.completion_add
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_sub (f g : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
(f - g).completion = f.completion - g.completion :=
map_sub (normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom : NormedAddGroupHom G H →+ _) f g
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_sub NormedAddGroupHom.completion_sub
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.zero_completion : (0 : NormedAddGroupHom G H).completion = 0 :=
normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom.map_zero
#align normed_add_group_hom.zero_completion NormedAddGroupHom.zero_completion
@[simps] -- Porting note: added `@[simps]`
def NormedAddCommGroup.toCompl : NormedAddGroupHom G (Completion G) where
toFun := (↑)
map_add' := Completion.toCompl.map_add
bound' := ⟨1, by simp [le_refl]⟩
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_compl NormedAddCommGroup.toCompl
open NormedAddCommGroup
theorem NormedAddCommGroup.norm_toCompl (x : G) : ‖toCompl x‖ = ‖x‖ :=
Completion.norm_coe x
#align normed_add_comm_group.norm_to_compl NormedAddCommGroup.norm_toCompl
theorem NormedAddCommGroup.denseRange_toCompl : DenseRange (toCompl : G → Completion G) :=
Completion.denseInducing_coe.dense
#align normed_add_comm_group.dense_range_to_compl NormedAddCommGroup.denseRange_toCompl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/HomCompletion.lean | 155 | 156 | theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_toCompl (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
f.completion.comp toCompl = toCompl.comp f := by | ext x; simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
#align_import data.set.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
open Function
namespace Set
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun _ => And.decidable
#align set.decidable_mem_prod Set.decidableMemProd
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
#align set.prod_mono Set.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
#align set.prod_mono_left Set.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
#align set.prod_mono_right Set.prod_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
#align set.prod_self_subset_prod_self Set.prod_self_subset_prod_self
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
#align set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self Set.prod_self_ssubset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
#align set.prod_subset_iff Set.prod_subset_iff
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
#align set.forall_prod_set Set.forall_prod_set
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
#align set.exists_prod_set Set.exists_prod_set
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact and_false_iff _
#align set.prod_empty Set.prod_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_prod Set.empty_prod
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact true_and_iff _
#align set.univ_prod_univ Set.univ_prod_univ
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.univ_prod Set.univ_prod
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
#align set.prod_univ Set.prod_univ
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.singleton_prod Set.singleton_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
#align set.prod_singleton Set.prod_singleton
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by simp
#align set.singleton_prod_singleton Set.singleton_prod_singleton
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
#align set.union_prod Set.union_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
#align set.prod_union Set.prod_union
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.inter_prod Set.inter_prod
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
#align set.prod_inter Set.prod_inter
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align set.prod_inter_prod Set.prod_inter_prod
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)]
#align set.disjoint_prod Set.disjoint_prod
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_left (hs : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨ha₁, _⟩ ⟨ha₂, _⟩ => disjoint_left.1 hs ha₁ ha₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_left Set.Disjoint.set_prod_left
theorem Disjoint.set_prod_right (ht : Disjoint t₁ t₂) (s₁ s₂ : Set α) :
Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun ⟨_a, _b⟩ ⟨_, hb₁⟩ ⟨_, hb₂⟩ => disjoint_left.1 ht hb₁ hb₂
#align set.disjoint.set_prod_right Set.Disjoint.set_prod_right
theorem insert_prod : insert a s ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp]
#align set.insert_prod Set.insert_prod
theorem prod_insert : s ×ˢ insert b t = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ∪ s ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
-- porting note (#10745):
-- was `simp (config := { contextual := true }) [image, iff_def, or_imp, Imp.swap]`
simp only [mem_prod, mem_insert_iff, image, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.injEq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨hx, rfl|hy⟩ := h
· exact Or.inl ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx, hy⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl, rfl⟩|⟨hx, hy⟩ := h
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨hx, Or.inr hy⟩
#align set.prod_insert Set.prod_insert
theorem prod_preimage_eq {f : γ → α} {g : δ → β} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : γ × δ => (f p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_eq Set.prod_preimage_eq
theorem prod_preimage_left {f : γ → α} :
(f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ t = (fun p : γ × β => (f p.1, p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_left Set.prod_preimage_left
theorem prod_preimage_right {g : δ → β} :
s ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) = (fun p : α × δ => (p.1, g p.2)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t :=
rfl
#align set.prod_preimage_right Set.prod_preimage_right
theorem preimage_prod_map_prod (f : α → β) (g : γ → δ) (s : Set β) (t : Set δ) :
Prod.map f g ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = (f ⁻¹' s) ×ˢ (g ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_prod_map_prod Set.preimage_prod_map_prod
theorem mk_preimage_prod (f : γ → α) (g : γ → β) :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = f ⁻¹' s ∩ g ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.mk_preimage_prod Set.mk_preimage_prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = s := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left Set.mk_preimage_prod_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right Set.mk_preimage_prod_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty (hb : b ∉ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext a
simp [hb]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty (ha : a ∉ s) : Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext b
simp [ha]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_empty
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
(fun a => (a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then s else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Prod.mk a ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then t else ∅ := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (f : γ → α) :
(fun a => (f a, b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if b ∈ t then f ⁻¹' s else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_left_eq_if, prod_preimage_left, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_left_fn_eq_if
theorem mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (g : δ → β) :
(fun b => (a, g b)) ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = if a ∈ s then g ⁻¹' t else ∅ := by
rw [← mk_preimage_prod_right_eq_if, prod_preimage_right, preimage_preimage]
#align set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if Set.mk_preimage_prod_right_fn_eq_if
@[simp]
theorem preimage_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_comm]
#align set.preimage_swap_prod Set.preimage_swap_prod
@[simp]
theorem image_swap_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : Prod.swap '' s ×ˢ t = t ×ˢ s := by
rw [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, preimage_swap_prod]
#align set.image_swap_prod Set.image_swap_prod
theorem prod_image_image_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
(m₁ '' s) ×ˢ (m₂ '' t) = (fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) '' s ×ˢ t :=
ext <| by
simp [-exists_and_right, exists_and_right.symm, and_left_comm, and_assoc, and_comm]
#align set.prod_image_image_eq Set.prod_image_image_eq
theorem prod_range_range_eq {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_range_eq Set.prod_range_range_eq
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_prod_map {m₁ : α → γ} {m₂ : β → δ} : range (Prod.map m₁ m₂) = range m₁ ×ˢ range m₂ :=
prod_range_range_eq.symm
#align set.range_prod_map Set.range_prod_map
theorem prod_range_univ_eq {m₁ : α → γ} :
range m₁ ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = range fun p : α × β => (m₁ p.1, p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_range_univ_eq Set.prod_range_univ_eq
theorem prod_univ_range_eq {m₂ : β → δ} :
(univ : Set α) ×ˢ range m₂ = range fun p : α × β => (p.1, m₂ p.2) :=
ext <| by simp [range]
#align set.prod_univ_range_eq Set.prod_univ_range_eq
theorem range_pair_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
(range fun x => (f x, g x)) ⊆ range f ×ˢ range g := by
have : (fun x => (f x, g x)) = Prod.map f g ∘ fun x => (x, x) := funext fun x => rfl
rw [this, ← range_prod_map]
apply range_comp_subset_range
#align set.range_pair_subset Set.range_pair_subset
theorem Nonempty.prod : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
⟨(x, y), ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.prod Set.Nonempty.prod
theorem Nonempty.fst : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.1, hx.1⟩
#align set.nonempty.fst Set.Nonempty.fst
theorem Nonempty.snd : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨x.2, hx.2⟩
#align set.nonempty.snd Set.Nonempty.snd
@[simp]
theorem prod_nonempty_iff : (s ×ˢ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod h.2⟩
#align set.prod_nonempty_iff Set.prod_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_empty_iff : s ×ˢ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
simp only [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm, prod_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
#align set.prod_eq_empty_iff Set.prod_eq_empty_iff
theorem prod_sub_preimage_iff {W : Set γ} {f : α × β → γ} :
s ×ˢ t ⊆ f ⁻¹' W ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ t → f (a, b) ∈ W := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.prod_sub_preimage_iff Set.prod_sub_preimage_iff
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Set α} :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) '' s ⊆ (f '' s) ×ˢ (g '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact mk_mem_prod (mem_image_of_mem f hx) (mem_image_of_mem g hx)
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod
theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => (a, b)) '' s ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left Set.image_prod_mk_subset_prod_left
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 345 | 347 | theorem image_prod_mk_subset_prod_right (ha : a ∈ s) : Prod.mk a '' t ⊆ s ×ˢ t := by |
rintro _ ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha, hb⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section iInf
variable {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toNNReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toNNReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, top_toNNReal, NNReal.iInf_empty]
· lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [← coe_iInf, toNNReal_coe]
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_infi ENNReal.toNNReal_iInf
theorem toNNReal_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sInf s).toNNReal = sInf (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
-- Porting note: `← sInf_image'` had to be replaced by `← image_eq_range` as the lemmas are used
-- in a different order.
simpa only [← sInf_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iInf hf)
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_Inf ENNReal.toNNReal_sInf
theorem toNNReal_iSup (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iSup f).toNNReal = ⨆ i, (f i).toNNReal := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
simp_rw [toNNReal_coe]
by_cases h : BddAbove (range f)
· rw [← coe_iSup h, toNNReal_coe]
· rw [NNReal.iSup_of_not_bddAbove h, iSup_coe_eq_top.2 h, top_toNNReal]
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_supr ENNReal.toNNReal_iSup
theorem toNNReal_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (hs : ∀ r ∈ s, r ≠ ∞) :
(sSup s).toNNReal = sSup (ENNReal.toNNReal '' s) := by
have hf : ∀ i, ((↑) : s → ℝ≥0∞) i ≠ ∞ := fun ⟨r, rs⟩ => hs r rs
-- Porting note: `← sSup_image'` had to be replaced by `← image_eq_range` as the lemmas are used
-- in a different order.
simpa only [← sSup_range, ← image_eq_range, Subtype.range_coe_subtype] using (toNNReal_iSup hf)
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_Sup ENNReal.toNNReal_sSup
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 572 | 573 | theorem toReal_iInf (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) : (iInf f).toReal = ⨅ i, (f i).toReal := by |
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, toNNReal_iInf hf, NNReal.coe_iInf]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pi
open Function Set
structure AddConstMap (G H : Type*) [Add G] [Add H] (a : G) (b : H) where
protected toFun : G → H
map_add_const' (x : G) : toFun (x + a) = toFun x + b
@[inherit_doc]
scoped [AddConstMap] notation:25 G " →+c[" a ", " b "] " H => AddConstMap G H a b
class AddConstMapClass (F : Type*) (G H : outParam Type*) [Add G] [Add H]
(a : outParam G) (b : outParam H) extends DFunLike F G fun _ ↦ H where
map_add_const (f : F) (x : G) : f (x + a) = f x + b
namespace AddConstMapClass
attribute [simp] map_add_const
variable {F G H : Type*} {a : G} {b : H}
protected theorem semiconj [Add G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
Semiconj f (· + a) (· + b) :=
map_add_const f
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddConstMap/Basic.lean | 73 | 75 | theorem map_add_nsmul [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b := by |
simpa using (AddConstMapClass.semiconj f).iterate_right n x
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
open Function Set
open scoped ENNReal Classical
noncomputable section
variable {α β δ : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α} {a : α}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
def dirac (a : α) : Measure α := (OuterMeasure.dirac a).toMeasure (by simp)
#align measure_theory.measure.dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac
instance : MeasureSpace PUnit :=
⟨dirac PUnit.unit⟩
theorem le_dirac_apply {a} : s.indicator 1 a ≤ dirac a s :=
OuterMeasure.dirac_apply a s ▸ le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_dirac_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_dirac_apply
@[simp]
theorem dirac_apply' (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : dirac a s = s.indicator 1 a :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.dirac_apply' MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac_apply'
@[simp]
theorem dirac_apply_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : dirac a s = 1 := by
have : ∀ t : Set α, a ∈ t → t.indicator (1 : α → ℝ≥0∞) a = 1 := fun t ht => indicator_of_mem ht 1
refine le_antisymm (this univ trivial ▸ ?_) (this s h ▸ le_dirac_apply)
rw [← dirac_apply' a MeasurableSet.univ]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ s)
#align measure_theory.measure.dirac_apply_of_mem MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac_apply_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem dirac_apply [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (a : α) (s : Set α) :
dirac a s = s.indicator 1 a := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s; · rw [dirac_apply_of_mem h, indicator_of_mem h, Pi.one_apply]
rw [indicator_of_not_mem h, ← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
calc
dirac a s ≤ dirac a {a}ᶜ := measure_mono (subset_compl_comm.1 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 h)
_ = 0 := by simp [dirac_apply' _ (measurableSet_singleton _).compl]
#align measure_theory.measure.dirac_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac_apply
theorem map_dirac {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) : (dirac a).map f = dirac (f a) :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hs, map_apply hf hs, hf hs, indicator_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.map_dirac
lemma map_const (μ : Measure α) (c : β) : μ.map (fun _ ↦ c) = (μ Set.univ) • dirac c := by
ext s hs
simp only [aemeasurable_const, measurable_const, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply,
dirac_apply' _ hs, smul_eq_mul]
classical
rw [Measure.map_apply measurable_const hs, Set.preimage_const]
by_cases hsc : c ∈ s
· rw [(Set.indicator_eq_one_iff_mem _).mpr hsc, mul_one, if_pos hsc]
· rw [if_neg hsc, (Set.indicator_eq_zero_iff_not_mem _).mpr hsc, measure_empty, mul_zero]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Dirac.lean | 77 | 83 | theorem restrict_singleton (μ : Measure α) (a : α) : μ.restrict {a} = μ {a} • dirac a := by |
ext1 s hs
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· have : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by simpa
simp [*]
· have : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := inter_singleton_eq_empty.2 ha
simp [*]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 295 | 296 | theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by |
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.InsertNth
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
#align_import data.vector.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace Vector
variable {α : Type*}
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
#align vector.to_list_injective Vector.toList_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
#align vector.ext Vector.ext
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
#align vector.zero_subsingleton Vector.zero_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align vector.cons_val Vector.cons_val
#align vector.cons_head Vector.head_cons
#align vector.cons_tail Vector.tail_cons
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
#align vector.eq_cons_iff Vector.eq_cons_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 71 | 72 | theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by | rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).reverse = p.reverse.copy hv hu := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_copy
@[simp]
theorem reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).reverse = q.reverse.append p.reverse := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).reverse = cons (G.symm h) p.reverse := by simp [concat_eq_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_concat
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).length = 0 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).length = p.length + 1 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons
@[simp]
theorem length_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).length = p.length := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.length_copy
@[simp]
theorem length_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_append SimpleGraph.Walk.length_append
@[simp]
theorem length_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).length = p.length + 1 := length_append _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.length_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.length_concat
@[simp]
protected theorem length_reverseAux {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
(p.reverseAux q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverseAux
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.length = p.length := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverse
theorem eq_of_length_eq_zero {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 0 → u = v
| nil, _ => rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero
theorem adj_of_length_eq_one {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 1 → G.Adj u v
| cons h nil, _ => h
@[simp]
theorem exists_length_eq_zero_iff {u v : V} : (∃ p : G.Walk u v, p.length = 0) ↔ u = v := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact eq_of_length_eq_zero hp
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨nil, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {u : V} {p : G.Walk u u} : p.length = 0 ↔ p = nil := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.length_eq_zero_iff
theorem getVert_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (i : ℕ) :
(p.append q).getVert i = if i < p.length then p.getVert i else q.getVert (i - p.length) := by
induction p generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons h p ih => cases i <;> simp [getVert, ih, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
theorem getVert_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (i : ℕ) :
p.reverse.getVert i = p.getVert (p.length - i) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [reverse_cons, getVert_append, length_reverse, ih, length_cons]
split_ifs
next hi =>
rw [Nat.succ_sub hi.le]
simp [getVert]
next hi =>
obtain rfl | hi' := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_not_lt hi
· simp [getVert]
· rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hi') rfl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hi']
simp [getVert]
theorem concat_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v u) : p.concat h ≠ nil := by
cases p <;> simp [concat]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_ne_nil
theorem concat_inj {u v v' w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {h : G.Adj v w} {p' : G.Walk u v'}
{h' : G.Adj v' w} (he : p.concat h = p'.concat h') : ∃ hv : v = v', p.copy rfl hv = p' := by
induction p with
| nil =>
cases p'
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
simp only [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he.symm
| cons _ _ ih =>
rw [concat_cons] at he
cases p'
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he
· rw [concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := ih he
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_inj SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_inj
def support {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List V
| nil => [u]
| cons _ p => u :: p.support
#align simple_graph.walk.support SimpleGraph.Walk.support
def darts {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List G.Dart
| nil => []
| cons h p => ⟨(u, _), h⟩ :: p.darts
#align simple_graph.walk.darts SimpleGraph.Walk.darts
def edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : List (Sym2 V) := p.darts.map Dart.edge
#align simple_graph.walk.edges SimpleGraph.Walk.edges
@[simp]
theorem support_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).support = [u] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nil
@[simp]
theorem support_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).support = u :: p.support := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_cons
@[simp]
theorem support_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).support = p.support.concat w := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.support_concat
@[simp]
theorem support_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).support = p.support := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.support_copy
theorem support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support = p.support ++ p'.support.tail := by
induction p <;> cases p' <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.support_append
@[simp]
theorem support_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.support = p.support.reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [support_append, *]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.support_reverse
@[simp]
theorem support_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support ≠ [] := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_ne_nil
theorem tail_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support.tail = p.support.tail ++ p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, List.tail_append_of_ne_nil _ _ (support_ne_nil _)]
#align simple_graph.walk.tail_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.tail_support_append
theorem support_eq_cons {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support = u :: p.support.tail := by
cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem start_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.support := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.start_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.start_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support := by induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : { w | w ∈ p.support }.Nonempty :=
⟨u, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nonempty SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nonempty
theorem mem_support_iff {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
w ∈ p.support ↔ w = u ∨ w ∈ p.support.tail := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff
theorem mem_support_nil_iff {u v : V} : u ∈ (nil : G.Walk v v).support ↔ u = v := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_nil_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_nil_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_tail_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support.tail ↔ t ∈ p.support.tail ∨ t ∈ p'.support.tail := by
rw [tail_support_append, List.mem_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_tail_support_of_ne {u v : V} (h : u ≠ v) (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support.tail := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_cons_of_ne h p
simp
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem mem_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support ↔ t ∈ p.support ∨ t ∈ p'.support := by
simp only [mem_support_iff, mem_tail_support_append_iff]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne t v <;> obtain rfl | h' := eq_or_ne t u <;>
-- this `have` triggers the unusedHavesSuffices linter:
(try have := h'.symm) <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_append_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 633 | 635 | theorem subset_support_append_left {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : p.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by |
simp only [Walk.support_append, List.subset_append_left]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Adjoint
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LagrangeMultipliers
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.rayleigh from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped NNReal
open Module.End Metric
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable (T : E →L[𝕜] E)
noncomputable abbrev rayleighQuotient (x : E) := T.reApplyInnerSelf x / ‖(x : E)‖ ^ 2
theorem rayleigh_smul (x : E) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
rayleighQuotient T (c • x) = rayleighQuotient T x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
have : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hc]
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul, T.reApplyInnerSelf_smul]
ring
#align continuous_linear_map.rayleigh_smul ContinuousLinearMap.rayleigh_smul
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Rayleigh.lean | 67 | 80 | theorem image_rayleigh_eq_image_rayleigh_sphere {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
rayleighQuotient T '' {0}ᶜ = rayleighQuotient T '' sphere 0 r := by |
ext a
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx : x ≠ 0, hxT⟩
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
let c : 𝕜 := ↑‖x‖⁻¹ * r
have : c ≠ 0 := by simp [c, hx, hr.ne']
refine ⟨c • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· field_simp [c, norm_smul, abs_of_pos hr]
· rw [T.rayleigh_smul x this]
exact hxT
· rintro ⟨x, hx, hxT⟩
exact ⟨x, ne_zero_of_mem_sphere hr.ne' ⟨x, hx⟩, hxT⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.PeakFunction
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.euler_sine_prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open scoped Real Topology
open Real Set Filter intervalIntegral MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace
namespace EulerSine
section IntegralRecursion
variable {z : ℂ} {n : ℕ}
theorem antideriv_cos_comp_const_mul (hz : z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => Complex.sin (2 * z * y) / (2 * z)) (Complex.cos (2 * z * x)) x := by
have a : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y * (2 * z)) _ x := hasDerivAt_mul_const _
have b : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => Complex.sin (y * (2 * z))) _ x :=
HasDerivAt.comp (x : ℂ) (Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (x * (2 * z))) a
have c := b.comp_ofReal.div_const (2 * z)
field_simp at c; simp only [fun y => mul_comm y (2 * z)] at c
exact c
#align euler_sine.antideriv_cos_comp_const_mul EulerSine.antideriv_cos_comp_const_mul
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/EulerSineProd.lean | 49 | 56 | theorem antideriv_sin_comp_const_mul (hz : z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => -Complex.cos (2 * z * y) / (2 * z)) (Complex.sin (2 * z * x)) x := by |
have a : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y * (2 * z)) _ x := hasDerivAt_mul_const _
have b : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => Complex.cos (y * (2 * z))) _ x :=
HasDerivAt.comp (x : ℂ) (Complex.hasDerivAt_cos (x * (2 * z))) a
have c := (b.comp_ofReal.div_const (2 * z)).neg
field_simp at c; simp only [fun y => mul_comm y (2 * z)] at c
exact c
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
#align_import algebra.order.field.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84771a9f5f0bd5e5d6218811556508ddf476dcbd"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
@[simps! (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def OrderIso.mulLeft₀ (a : α) (ha : 0 < a) : α ≃o α :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft₀ a ha.ne' with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => mul_le_mul_left ha }
#align order_iso.mul_left₀ OrderIso.mulLeft₀
#align order_iso.mul_left₀_symm_apply OrderIso.mulLeft₀_symm_apply
#align order_iso.mul_left₀_apply OrderIso.mulLeft₀_apply
@[simps! (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def OrderIso.mulRight₀ (a : α) (ha : 0 < a) : α ≃o α :=
{ Equiv.mulRight₀ a ha.ne' with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => mul_le_mul_right ha }
#align order_iso.mul_right₀ OrderIso.mulRight₀
#align order_iso.mul_right₀_symm_apply OrderIso.mulRight₀_symm_apply
#align order_iso.mul_right₀_apply OrderIso.mulRight₀_apply
theorem le_div_iff (hc : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => div_mul_cancel₀ b (ne_of_lt hc).symm ▸ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hc.le, fun h =>
calc
a = a * c * (1 / c) := mul_mul_div a (ne_of_lt hc).symm
_ ≤ b * (1 / c) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_pos.2 hc).le
_ = b / c := (div_eq_mul_one_div b c).symm
⟩
#align le_div_iff le_div_iff
theorem le_div_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff hc]
#align le_div_iff' le_div_iff'
theorem div_le_iff (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b :=
⟨fun h =>
calc
a = a / b * b := by rw [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_lt hb).symm]
_ ≤ c * b := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hb.le
,
fun h =>
calc
a / b = a * (1 / b) := div_eq_mul_one_div a b
_ ≤ c * b * (1 / b) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_pos.2 hb).le
_ = c * b / b := (div_eq_mul_one_div (c * b) b).symm
_ = c := by refine (div_eq_iff (ne_of_gt hb)).mpr rfl
⟩
#align div_le_iff div_le_iff
theorem div_le_iff' (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [mul_comm, div_le_iff hb]
#align div_le_iff' div_le_iff'
lemma div_le_comm₀ (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a / c ≤ b := by
rw [div_le_iff hb, div_le_iff' hc]
theorem lt_div_iff (hc : 0 < c) : a < b / c ↔ a * c < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| div_le_iff hc
#align lt_div_iff lt_div_iff
theorem lt_div_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : a < b / c ↔ c * a < b := by rw [mul_comm, lt_div_iff hc]
#align lt_div_iff' lt_div_iff'
theorem div_lt_iff (hc : 0 < c) : b / c < a ↔ b < a * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_div_iff hc)
#align div_lt_iff div_lt_iff
theorem div_lt_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : b / c < a ↔ b < c * a := by rw [mul_comm, div_lt_iff hc]
#align div_lt_iff' div_lt_iff'
lemma div_lt_comm₀ (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < c ↔ a / c < b := by
rw [div_lt_iff hb, div_lt_iff' hc]
theorem inv_mul_le_iff (h : 0 < b) : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_one_div]
exact div_le_iff' h
#align inv_mul_le_iff inv_mul_le_iff
theorem inv_mul_le_iff' (h : 0 < b) : b⁻¹ * a ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by rw [inv_mul_le_iff h, mul_comm]
#align inv_mul_le_iff' inv_mul_le_iff'
theorem mul_inv_le_iff (h : 0 < b) : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b * c := by rw [mul_comm, inv_mul_le_iff h]
#align mul_inv_le_iff mul_inv_le_iff
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 110 | 110 | theorem mul_inv_le_iff' (h : 0 < b) : a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by | rw [mul_comm, inv_mul_le_iff' h]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Bilinear
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.mul from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d608fc5d4e69d4cc21885913fb573a88b0deb521"
open scoped Classical
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
section Mul
variable {𝔸 𝔸' : Type*} [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedCommRing 𝔸'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸']
{a b : E → 𝔸} {a' b' : E →L[𝕜] 𝔸} {c d : E → 𝔸'} {c' d' : E →L[𝕜] 𝔸'}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.mul' {x : E} (ha : HasStrictFDerivAt a a' x)
(hb : HasStrictFDerivAt b b' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => a y * b y) (a x • b' + a'.smulRight (b x)) x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).isBoundedBilinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt (a x, b x)).comp x
(ha.prod hb)
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.mul' HasStrictFDerivAt.mul'
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Mul.lean | 376 | 380 | theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.mul (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') x := by |
convert hc.mul' hd
ext z
apply mul_comm
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Encodable
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
#align_import linear_algebra.finsupp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
noncomputable section
open Set LinearMap Submodule
namespace Finsupp
variable {α : Type*} {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {R : Type*} {S : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P]
def lsingle (a : α) : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M :=
{ Finsupp.singleAddHom a with map_smul' := fun _ _ => (smul_single _ _ _).symm }
#align finsupp.lsingle Finsupp.lsingle
theorem lhom_ext ⦃φ ψ : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] N⦄ (h : ∀ a b, φ (single a b) = ψ (single a b)) : φ = ψ :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext h
#align finsupp.lhom_ext Finsupp.lhom_ext
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `LinearMap.ext`.
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' ⦃φ ψ : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] N⦄ (h : ∀ a, φ.comp (lsingle a) = ψ.comp (lsingle a)) :
φ = ψ :=
lhom_ext fun a => LinearMap.congr_fun (h a)
#align finsupp.lhom_ext' Finsupp.lhom_ext'
def lapply (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M :=
{ Finsupp.applyAddHom a with map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align finsupp.lapply Finsupp.lapply
@[simps]
def lcoeFun : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_add' x y := by
ext
simp
map_smul' x y := by
ext
simp
#align finsupp.lcoe_fun Finsupp.lcoeFun
@[simp]
theorem lsingle_apply (a : α) (b : M) : (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) b = single a b :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lsingle_apply Finsupp.lsingle_apply
@[simp]
theorem lapply_apply (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (lapply a : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M) f = f a :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lapply_apply Finsupp.lapply_apply
@[simp]
theorem lapply_comp_lsingle_same (a : α) : lapply a ∘ₗ lsingle a = (.id : M →ₗ[R] M) := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem lapply_comp_lsingle_of_ne (a a' : α) (h : a ≠ a') :
lapply a ∘ₗ lsingle a' = (0 : M →ₗ[R] M) := by ext; simp [h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem ker_lsingle (a : α) : ker (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot_of_injective (single_injective a)
#align finsupp.ker_lsingle Finsupp.ker_lsingle
theorem lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply (s t : Set α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
⨆ a ∈ s, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) ≤
⨅ a ∈ t, ker (lapply a : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M) := by
refine iSup_le fun a₁ => iSup_le fun h₁ => range_le_iff_comap.2 ?_
simp only [(ker_comp _ _).symm, eq_top_iff, SetLike.le_def, mem_ker, comap_iInf, mem_iInf]
intro b _ a₂ h₂
have : a₁ ≠ a₂ := fun eq => h.le_bot ⟨h₁, eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
exact single_eq_of_ne this
#align finsupp.lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply Finsupp.lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply
theorem iInf_ker_lapply_le_bot : ⨅ a, ker (lapply a : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M) ≤ ⊥ := by
simp only [SetLike.le_def, mem_iInf, mem_ker, mem_bot, lapply_apply]
exact fun a h => Finsupp.ext h
#align finsupp.infi_ker_lapply_le_bot Finsupp.iInf_ker_lapply_le_bot
theorem iSup_lsingle_range : ⨆ a, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 fun f _ => ?_
rw [← sum_single f]
exact sum_mem fun a _ => Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem a ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align finsupp.supr_lsingle_range Finsupp.iSup_lsingle_range
theorem disjoint_lsingle_lsingle (s t : Set α) (hs : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (⨆ a ∈ s, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M))
(⨆ a ∈ t, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M)) := by
-- Porting note: 2 placeholders are added to prevent timeout.
refine
(Disjoint.mono
(lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply s sᶜ ?_)
(lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply t tᶜ ?_))
?_
· apply disjoint_compl_right
· apply disjoint_compl_right
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
refine le_trans (le_iInf fun i => ?_) iInf_ker_lapply_le_bot
classical
by_cases his : i ∈ s
· by_cases hit : i ∈ t
· exact (hs.le_bot ⟨his, hit⟩).elim
exact inf_le_of_right_le (iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le _ hit)
exact inf_le_of_left_le (iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le _ his)
#align finsupp.disjoint_lsingle_lsingle Finsupp.disjoint_lsingle_lsingle
theorem span_single_image (s : Set M) (a : α) :
Submodule.span R (single a '' s) = (Submodule.span R s).map (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) := by
rw [← span_image]; rfl
#align finsupp.span_single_image Finsupp.span_single_image
variable (M R)
def supported (s : Set α) : Submodule R (α →₀ M) where
carrier := { p | ↑p.support ⊆ s }
add_mem' {p q} hp hq := by
classical
refine Subset.trans (Subset.trans (Finset.coe_subset.2 support_add) ?_) (union_subset hp hq)
rw [Finset.coe_union]
zero_mem' := by
simp only [subset_def, Finset.mem_coe, Set.mem_setOf_eq, mem_support_iff, zero_apply]
intro h ha
exact (ha rfl).elim
smul_mem' a p hp := Subset.trans (Finset.coe_subset.2 support_smul) hp
#align finsupp.supported Finsupp.supported
variable {M}
theorem mem_supported {s : Set α} (p : α →₀ M) : p ∈ supported M R s ↔ ↑p.support ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finsupp.mem_supported Finsupp.mem_supported
theorem mem_supported' {s : Set α} (p : α →₀ M) :
p ∈ supported M R s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, p x = 0 := by
haveI := Classical.decPred fun x : α => x ∈ s; simp [mem_supported, Set.subset_def, not_imp_comm]
#align finsupp.mem_supported' Finsupp.mem_supported'
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp.lean | 319 | 320 | theorem mem_supported_support (p : α →₀ M) : p ∈ Finsupp.supported M R (p.support : Set α) := by |
rw [Finsupp.mem_supported]
|
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_bihimp toDual_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_symm_diff ofDual_symmDiff
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
#align bihimp_comm bihimp_comm
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
#align bihimp_is_comm bihimp_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
#align bihimp_self bihimp_self
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 252 | 252 | theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by | rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
#align_import data.polynomial.coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2651125b48fc5c170ab1111afd0817c903b1fc6c"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p + q) n = coeff p n + coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_add, coeff]
exact Finsupp.add_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_add Polynomial.coeff_add
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_bit0 (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (bit0 p) n = bit0 (coeff p n) := by simp [bit0]
#align polynomial.coeff_bit0 Polynomial.coeff_bit0
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (r • p) n = r • coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, coeff]
exact Finsupp.smul_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_smul Polynomial.coeff_smul
theorem support_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) :
support (r • p) ⊆ support p := by
intro i hi
simp? [mem_support_iff] at hi ⊢ says simp only [mem_support_iff, coeff_smul, ne_eq] at hi ⊢
contrapose! hi
simp [hi]
#align polynomial.support_smul Polynomial.support_smul
open scoped Pointwise in
theorem card_support_mul_le : (p * q).support.card ≤ p.support.card * q.support.card := by
calc (p * q).support.card
_ = (p.toFinsupp * q.toFinsupp).support.card := by rw [← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
_ ≤ (p.toFinsupp.support + q.toFinsupp.support).card :=
Finset.card_le_card (AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p.toFinsupp q.toFinsupp)
_ ≤ p.support.card * q.support.card := Finset.card_image₂_le ..
@[simps]
def lsum {R A M : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring A] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R A] [Module R M]
(f : ℕ → A →ₗ[R] M) : A[X] →ₗ[R] M where
toFun p := p.sum (f · ·)
map_add' p q := sum_add_index p q _ (fun n => (f n).map_zero) fun n _ _ => (f n).map_add _ _
map_smul' c p := by
-- Porting note: added `dsimp only`; `beta_reduce` alone is not sufficient
dsimp only
rw [sum_eq_of_subset (f · ·) (fun n => (f n).map_zero) (support_smul c p)]
simp only [sum_def, Finset.smul_sum, coeff_smul, LinearMap.map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
#align polynomial.lsum Polynomial.lsum
#align polynomial.lsum_apply Polynomial.lsum_apply
variable (R)
def lcoeff (n : ℕ) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun p := coeff p n
map_add' p q := coeff_add p q n
map_smul' r p := coeff_smul r p n
#align polynomial.lcoeff Polynomial.lcoeff
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem lcoeff_apply (n : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : lcoeff R n f = coeff f n :=
rfl
#align polynomial.lcoeff_apply Polynomial.lcoeff_apply
@[simp]
theorem finset_sum_coeff {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (∑ b ∈ s, f b) n = ∑ b ∈ s, coeff (f b) n :=
map_sum (lcoeff R n) _ _
#align polynomial.finset_sum_coeff Polynomial.finset_sum_coeff
lemma coeff_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
l.sum.coeff n = (l.map (lcoeff R n)).sum :=
map_list_sum (lcoeff R n) _
lemma coeff_list_sum_map {ι : Type*} (l : List ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(l.map f).sum.coeff n = (l.map (fun a => (f a).coeff n)).sum := by
simp_rw [coeff_list_sum, List.map_map, Function.comp, lcoeff_apply]
theorem coeff_sum [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R → S[X]) :
coeff (p.sum f) n = p.sum fun a b => coeff (f a b) n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [Polynomial.sum, support, coeff]`.
simp [Polynomial.sum, support_ofFinsupp, coeff_ofFinsupp]
#align polynomial.coeff_sum Polynomial.coeff_sum
theorem coeff_mul (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * q) n = ∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q n _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
#align polynomial.coeff_mul Polynomial.coeff_mul
@[simp]
theorem mul_coeff_zero (p q : R[X]) : coeff (p * q) 0 = coeff p 0 * coeff q 0 := by simp [coeff_mul]
#align polynomial.mul_coeff_zero Polynomial.mul_coeff_zero
@[simps]
def constantCoeff : R[X] →+* R where
toFun p := coeff p 0
map_one' := coeff_one_zero
map_mul' := mul_coeff_zero
map_zero' := coeff_zero 0
map_add' p q := coeff_add p q 0
#align polynomial.constant_coeff Polynomial.constantCoeff
#align polynomial.constant_coeff_apply Polynomial.constantCoeff_apply
theorem isUnit_C {x : R} : IsUnit (C x) ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h => (congr_arg IsUnit coeff_C_zero).mp (h.map <| @constantCoeff R _), fun h => h.map C⟩
#align polynomial.is_unit_C Polynomial.isUnit_C
theorem coeff_mul_X_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (p * X) 0 = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_X_zero Polynomial.coeff_mul_X_zero
theorem coeff_X_mul_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (X * p) 0 = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.coeff_X_mul_zero Polynomial.coeff_X_mul_zero
theorem coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff (C x * X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then x else 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial]
congr 1
simp [eq_comm]
#align polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_C_mul_X (x : R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (C x * X : R[X]) n = if n = 1 then x else 0 := by
rw [← pow_one X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X Polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (p : R[X]) : coeff (C a * p) n = a * coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp_rw [← monomial_zero_left, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.single_zero_mul_apply p a n
#align polynomial.coeff_C_mul Polynomial.coeff_C_mul
theorem C_mul' (a : R) (f : R[X]) : C a * f = a • f := by
ext
rw [coeff_C_mul, coeff_smul, smul_eq_mul]
#align polynomial.C_mul' Polynomial.C_mul'
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff (p * C a) n = coeff p n * a := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp_rw [← monomial_zero_left, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_zero_apply p a n
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_C Polynomial.coeff_mul_C
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_natCast {a k : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (a : R[X])) k = coeff p k * (↑a : R) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_natCast_mul {a k : ℕ} :
coeff ((a : R[X]) * p) k = a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_ofNat {a k : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo a] :
coeff (p * (no_index (OfNat.ofNat a) : R[X])) k = coeff p k * OfNat.ofNat a := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] lemma coeff_ofNat_mul {a k : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo a] :
coeff ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat a) : R[X]) * p) k = OfNat.ofNat a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_intCast [Ring S] {p : S[X]} {a : ℤ} {k : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (a : S[X])) k = coeff p k * (↑a : S) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_intCast_mul [Ring S] {p : S[X]} {a : ℤ} {k : ℕ} :
coeff ((a : S[X]) * p) k = a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow (k n : ℕ) : coeff (X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [one_mul, RingHom.map_one, ← coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.coeff_X_pow Polynomial.coeff_X_pow
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Coeff.lean | 218 | 218 | theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff (X ^ n : R[X]) n = 1 := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
#align_import data.nat.factors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
attribute [instance 0] instBEqNat
def factors : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| 1 => []
| k + 2 =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
m :: factors ((k + 2) / m)
decreasing_by show (k + 2) / m < (k + 2); exact factors_lemma
#align nat.factors Nat.factors
@[simp]
theorem factors_zero : factors 0 = [] := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_zero Nat.factors_zero
@[simp]
theorem factors_one : factors 1 = [] := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_one Nat.factors_one
@[simp]
theorem factors_two : factors 2 = [2] := by simp [factors]
theorem prime_of_mem_factors {n : ℕ} : ∀ {p : ℕ}, (h : p ∈ factors n) → Prime p := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro p h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
have h₁ : p = m ∨ p ∈ factors ((k + 2) / m) :=
List.mem_cons.1 (by rwa [factors] at h)
exact Or.casesOn h₁ (fun h₂ => h₂.symm ▸ minFac_prime (by simp)) prime_of_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factors Nat.prime_of_mem_factors
theorem pos_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ factors n) : 0 < p :=
Prime.pos (prime_of_mem_factors h)
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factors Nat.pos_of_mem_factors
theorem prod_factors : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → List.prod (factors n) = n
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| k + 2 => fun _ =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
show (factors (k + 2)).prod = (k + 2) by
have h₁ : (k + 2) / m ≠ 0 := fun h => by
have : (k + 2) = 0 * m := (Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left (minFac_pos _) (minFac_dvd _)).1 h
rw [zero_mul] at this; exact (show k + 2 ≠ 0 by simp) this
rw [factors, List.prod_cons, prod_factors h₁, Nat.mul_div_cancel' (minFac_dvd _)]
#align nat.prod_factors Nat.prod_factors
theorem factors_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : p.factors = [p] := by
have : p = p - 2 + 2 := (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hp.two_le).mp rfl
rw [this, Nat.factors]
simp only [Eq.symm this]
have : Nat.minFac p = p := (Nat.prime_def_minFac.mp hp).2
simp only [this, Nat.factors, Nat.div_self (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
#align nat.factors_prime Nat.factors_prime
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factors.lean | 93 | 104 | theorem factors_chain {n : ℕ} :
∀ {a}, (∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → a ≤ p) → List.Chain (· ≤ ·) a (factors n) := by |
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro a h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
rw [factors]
refine List.Chain.cons ((le_minFac.2 h).resolve_left (by simp)) (factors_chain ?_)
exact fun p pp d => minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le (d.trans <| div_dvd_of_dvd <| minFac_dvd _)
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
#align ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt Ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
#align ordinal.mul_div_cancel Ordinal.mul_div_cancel
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
#align ordinal.div_one Ordinal.div_one
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
#align ordinal.div_self Ordinal.div_self
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
#align ordinal.mul_sub Ordinal.mul_sub
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply sub_isLimit h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact add_isLimit a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
#align ordinal.is_limit_add_iff Ordinal.isLimit_add_iff
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_add_iff Ordinal.dvd_add_iff
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
#align ordinal.div_mul_cancel Ordinal.div_mul_cancel
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
#align ordinal.le_of_dvd Ordinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
#align ordinal.dvd_antisymm Ordinal.dvd_antisymm
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.mod_def Ordinal.mod_def
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
#align ordinal.mod_le Ordinal.mod_le
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_zero Ordinal.mod_zero
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt Ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
#align ordinal.zero_mod Ordinal.zero_mod
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
#align ordinal.div_add_mod Ordinal.div_add_mod
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
#align ordinal.mod_lt Ordinal.mod_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_self Ordinal.mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_one Ordinal.mod_one
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
#align ordinal.mul_add_mod_self Ordinal.mul_add_mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
#align ordinal.mul_mod Ordinal.mul_mod
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
#align ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
#align ordinal.mod_mod Ordinal.mod_mod
def bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
∀ a < type r, α := fun a ha => f (enum r a ha)
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'
def bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} : (ι → α) → ∀ a < type (@WellOrderingRel ι), α :=
bfamilyOfFamily' WellOrderingRel
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily
def familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, α) : ι → α := fun i =>
f (typein r i)
(by
rw [← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i)
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'
def familyOfBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : o.out.α → α :=
familyOfBFamily' (· < ·) (type_lt o) f
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily Ordinal.familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
theorem bfamilyOfFamily'_typein {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily' r f (typein r i) (typein_lt_type r i) = f i := by
simp only [bfamilyOfFamily', enum_typein]
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family'_typein Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'_typein
@[simp]
theorem bfamilyOfFamily_typein {ι} (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily f (typein _ i) (typein_lt_type _ i) = f i :=
bfamilyOfFamily'_typein _ f i
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family_typein Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily_typein
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem familyOfBFamily'_enum {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) :
familyOfBFamily' r ho f (enum r i (by rwa [ho])) = f i hi := by
simp only [familyOfBFamily', typein_enum]
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily'_enum Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'_enum
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem familyOfBFamily_enum (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) :
familyOfBFamily o f
(enum (· < ·) i
(by
convert hi
exact type_lt _)) =
f i hi :=
familyOfBFamily'_enum _ (type_lt o) f _ _
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily_enum Ordinal.familyOfBFamily_enum
def brange (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : Set α :=
{ a | ∃ i hi, f i hi = a }
#align ordinal.brange Ordinal.brange
theorem mem_brange {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, α} {a} : a ∈ brange o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.mem_brange Ordinal.mem_brange
theorem mem_brange_self {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) : f i hi ∈ brange o f :=
⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
#align ordinal.mem_brange_self Ordinal.mem_brange_self
@[simp]
theorem range_familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : range (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = brange o f := by
refine Set.ext fun a => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, familyOfBFamily'_enum _ _ _ _ _⟩
#align ordinal.range_family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.range_familyOfBFamily'
@[simp]
theorem range_familyOfBFamily {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) : range (familyOfBFamily o f) = brange o f :=
range_familyOfBFamily' _ _ f
#align ordinal.range_family_of_bfamily Ordinal.range_familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
theorem brange_bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
brange _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = range f := by
refine Set.ext fun a => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
apply mem_range_self
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, bfamilyOfFamily'_typein _ _ _⟩
#align ordinal.brange_bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.brange_bfamilyOfFamily'
@[simp]
theorem brange_bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) : brange _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = range f :=
brange_bfamilyOfFamily' _ _
#align ordinal.brange_bfamily_of_family Ordinal.brange_bfamilyOfFamily
@[simp]
theorem brange_const {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) {c : α} : (brange o fun _ _ => c) = {c} := by
rw [← range_familyOfBFamily]
exact @Set.range_const _ o.out.α (out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho) c
#align ordinal.brange_const Ordinal.brange_const
theorem comp_bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α)
(g : α → β) : (fun i hi => g (bfamilyOfFamily' r f i hi)) = bfamilyOfFamily' r (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.comp_bfamilyOfFamily'
theorem comp_bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) (g : α → β) :
(fun i hi => g (bfamilyOfFamily f i hi)) = bfamilyOfFamily (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_bfamily_of_family Ordinal.comp_bfamilyOfFamily
theorem comp_familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ familyOfBFamily' r ho f = familyOfBFamily' r ho fun i hi => g (f i hi) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.comp_familyOfBFamily'
theorem comp_familyOfBFamily {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ familyOfBFamily o f = familyOfBFamily o fun i hi => g (f i hi) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_family_of_bfamily Ordinal.comp_familyOfBFamily
-- Porting note: Universes should be specified in `sup`s.
def sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
iSup f
#align ordinal.sup Ordinal.sup
@[simp]
theorem sSup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : sSup (Set.range f) = sup.{_, v} f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.Sup_eq_sup Ordinal.sSup_eq_sup
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
⟨(iSup (succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, by
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact le_of_lt (Cardinal.lt_ord.2 ((lt_succ _).trans_le
(le_ciSup (Cardinal.bddAbove_range.{_, v} _) _)))⟩
#align ordinal.bdd_above_range Ordinal.bddAbove_range
theorem le_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup.{_, v} f := fun i =>
le_csSup (bddAbove_range.{_, v} f) (mem_range_self i)
#align ordinal.le_sup Ordinal.le_sup
theorem sup_le_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : sup.{_, v} f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range.{_, v} f)).trans (by simp)
#align ordinal.sup_le_iff Ordinal.sup_le_iff
theorem sup_le {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : (∀ i, f i ≤ a) → sup.{_, v} f ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.sup_le Ordinal.sup_le
theorem lt_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : a < sup.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@sup_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_sup Ordinal.lt_sup
theorem ne_sup_iff_lt_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} :
(∀ i, f i ≠ sup.{_, v} f) ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup.{_, v} f :=
⟨fun hf _ => lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf _), fun hf _ => ne_of_lt (hf _)⟩
#align ordinal.ne_sup_iff_lt_sup Ordinal.ne_sup_iff_lt_sup
theorem sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ sup.{_, v} f) {a} (hao : a < sup.{_, v} f) : succ a < sup.{_, v} f := by
by_contra! hoa
exact
hao.not_le (sup_le fun i => le_of_lt_succ <| (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf i)).trans_le hoa)
#align ordinal.sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup Ordinal.sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} :
sup.{_, v} f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun h i => ?_, fun h =>
le_antisymm (sup_le fun i => Ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i)) (Ordinal.zero_le _)⟩
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← h]
exact le_sup f i
#align ordinal.sup_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.sup_eq_zero_iff
theorem IsNormal.sup {f : Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u w}} (H : IsNormal f) {ι : Type u}
(g : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) [Nonempty ι] : f (sup.{_, v} g) = sup.{_, w} (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
rw [sup_le_iff]; simp only [comp]; rw [H.le_set' Set.univ Set.univ_nonempty g] <;>
simp [sup_le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.sup Ordinal.IsNormal.sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_empty {ι} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : sup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
#align ordinal.sup_empty Ordinal.sup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_const {ι} [_hι : Nonempty ι] (o : Ordinal) : (sup fun _ : ι => o) = o :=
ciSup_const
#align ordinal.sup_const Ordinal.sup_const
@[simp]
theorem sup_unique {ι} [Unique ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : sup f = f default :=
ciSup_unique
#align ordinal.sup_unique Ordinal.sup_unique
theorem sup_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) : sup.{u, max v w} f ≤ sup.{v, max u w} g :=
sup_le fun i =>
match h (mem_range_self i) with
| ⟨_j, hj⟩ => hj ▸ le_sup _ _
#align ordinal.sup_le_of_range_subset Ordinal.sup_le_of_range_subset
theorem sup_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f = Set.range g) : sup.{u, max v w} f = sup.{v, max u w} g :=
(sup_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (sup_le_of_range_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.sup_eq_of_range_eq Ordinal.sup_eq_of_range_eq
@[simp]
theorem sup_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : Sum α β → Ordinal) :
sup.{max u v, w} f =
max (sup.{u, max v w} fun a => f (Sum.inl a)) (sup.{v, max u w} fun b => f (Sum.inr b)) := by
apply (sup_le_iff.2 _).antisymm (max_le_iff.2 ⟨_, _⟩)
· rintro (i | i)
· exact le_max_of_le_left (le_sup _ i)
· exact le_max_of_le_right (le_sup _ i)
all_goals
apply sup_le_of_range_subset.{_, max u v, w}
rintro i ⟨a, rfl⟩
apply mem_range_self
#align ordinal.sup_sum Ordinal.sup_sum
theorem unbounded_range_of_sup_ge {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β → α)
(h : type r ≤ sup.{u, u} (typein r ∘ f)) : Unbounded r (range f) :=
(not_bounded_iff _).1 fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
not_lt_of_le h <|
lt_of_le_of_lt
(sup_le fun y => le_of_lt <| (typein_lt_typein r).2 <| hx _ <| mem_range_self y)
(typein_lt_type r x)
#align ordinal.unbounded_range_of_sup_ge Ordinal.unbounded_range_of_sup_ge
theorem le_sup_shrink_equiv {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} (hs : Small.{u} s) (a) (ha : a ∈ s) :
a ≤ sup.{u, u} fun x => ((@equivShrink s hs).symm x).val := by
convert le_sup.{u, u} (fun x => ((@equivShrink s hs).symm x).val) ((@equivShrink s hs) ⟨a, ha⟩)
rw [symm_apply_apply]
#align ordinal.le_sup_shrink_equiv Ordinal.le_sup_shrink_equiv
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio o) :=
let f : o.out.α → Set.Iio o :=
fun x => ⟨typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
let hf : Surjective f := fun b =>
⟨enum (· < ·) b.val
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact b.prop),
Subtype.ext (typein_enum _ _)⟩
small_of_surjective hf
#align ordinal.small_Iio Ordinal.small_Iio
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_succ]
infer_instance
#align ordinal.small_Iic Ordinal.small_Iic
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => small_subset <| show s ⊆ Iic a from fun _x hx => h hx, fun h =>
⟨sup.{u, u} fun x => ((@equivShrink s h).symm x).val, le_sup_shrink_equiv h⟩⟩
#align ordinal.bdd_above_iff_small Ordinal.bddAbove_iff_small
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Ordinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
#align ordinal.bdd_above_of_small Ordinal.bddAbove_of_small
theorem sup_eq_sSup {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} (hs : Small.{u} s) :
(sup.{u, u} fun x => (@equivShrink s hs).symm x) = sSup s :=
let hs' := bddAbove_iff_small.2 hs
((csSup_le_iff' hs').2 (le_sup_shrink_equiv hs)).antisymm'
(sup_le fun _x => le_csSup hs' (Subtype.mem _))
#align ordinal.sup_eq_Sup Ordinal.sup_eq_sSup
theorem sSup_ord {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} (hs : BddAbove s) : (sSup s).ord = sSup (ord '' s) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
rw [csSup_le_iff'
(bddAbove_iff_small.2 (@small_image _ _ _ s (Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small.1 hs))),
ord_le, csSup_le_iff' hs]
simp [ord_le]
#align ordinal.Sup_ord Ordinal.sSup_ord
theorem iSup_ord {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
(iSup f).ord = ⨆ i, (f i).ord := by
unfold iSup
convert sSup_ord hf
-- Porting note: `change` is required.
conv_lhs => change range (ord ∘ f)
rw [range_comp]
#align ordinal.supr_ord Ordinal.iSup_ord
private theorem sup_le_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop)
[IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) ≤ sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_le fun i => by
cases'
typein_surj r'
(by
rw [ho', ← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i) with
j hj
simp_rw [familyOfBFamily', ← hj]
apply le_sup
theorem sup_eq_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
[IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_eq_of_range_eq.{u, u, v} (by simp)
#align ordinal.sup_eq_sup Ordinal.sup_eq_sup
def bsup (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.bsup Ordinal.bsup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.sup_eq_bsup Ordinal.sup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bsup' {o : Ordinal.{u}} {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
sup_eq_sup r _ ho _ f
#align ordinal.sup_eq_bsup' Ordinal.sup_eq_bsup'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem sSup_eq_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sSup (brange o f) = bsup.{_, v} o f := by
congr
rw [range_familyOfBFamily]
#align ordinal.Sup_eq_bsup Ordinal.sSup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_sup' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = sup.{_, v} f := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [← sup_eq_bsup' r, enum_typein,
familyOfBFamily', bfamilyOfFamily']
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_sup' Ordinal.bsup_eq_sup'
theorem bsup_eq_bsup {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι r']
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r' f) := by
rw [bsup_eq_sup', bsup_eq_sup']
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_bsup Ordinal.bsup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = sup.{_, v} f :=
bsup_eq_sup' _ f
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_sup Ordinal.bsup_eq_sup
@[congr]
theorem bsup_congr {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o₁, Ordinal.{max u v}) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
bsup.{_, v} o₁ f = bsup.{_, v} o₂ fun a h => f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm) := by
subst ho
-- Porting note: `rfl` is required.
rfl
#align ordinal.bsup_congr Ordinal.bsup_congr
theorem bsup_le_iff {o f a} : bsup.{u, v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.trans
⟨fun h i hi => by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
exact h _, fun h i => h _ _⟩
#align ordinal.bsup_le_iff Ordinal.bsup_le_iff
theorem bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal} {a} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≤ a) → bsup.{u, v} o f ≤ a :=
bsup_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.bsup_le Ordinal.bsup_le
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
#align ordinal.le_bsup Ordinal.le_bsup
theorem lt_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) {a} :
a < bsup.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a < f i hi := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@bsup_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_bsup Ordinal.lt_bsup
theorem IsNormal.bsup {f : Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u w}} (H : IsNormal f)
{o : Ordinal.{u}} :
∀ (g : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), o ≠ 0 → f (bsup.{_, v} o g) = bsup.{_, w} o fun a h => f (g a h) :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ g h => by
haveI := type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h
rw [← sup_eq_bsup' r, IsNormal.sup.{_, v, w} H, ← sup_eq_bsup' r] <;> rfl
#align ordinal.is_normal.bsup Ordinal.IsNormal.bsup
theorem lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≠ bsup.{_, v} o f) ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{_, v} o f :=
⟨fun hf _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne (le_bsup _ _ _) (hf _ _), fun hf _ _ => ne_of_lt (hf _ _)⟩
#align ordinal.lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup Ordinal.lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup
theorem bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i : Ordinal} (h : i < o), f i h ≠ bsup.{_, v} o f) (a) :
a < bsup.{_, v} o f → succ a < bsup.{_, v} o f := by
rw [← sup_eq_bsup] at *
exact sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup fun i => hf _
#align ordinal.bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup Ordinal.bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_zero_iff {o} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} : bsup o f = 0 ↔ ∀ i hi, f i hi = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h =>
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun i hi => Ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i hi)) (Ordinal.zero_le _)⟩
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← h]
exact le_bsup f i hi
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.bsup_eq_zero_iff
theorem lt_bsup_of_limit {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {a a'} (ha : a < o) (ha' : a' < o), a < a' → f a ha < f a' ha')
(ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) (i h) : f i h < bsup o f :=
(hf _ _ <| lt_succ i).trans_le (le_bsup f (succ i) <| ho _ h)
#align ordinal.lt_bsup_of_limit Ordinal.lt_bsup_of_limit
theorem bsup_succ_of_mono {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < succ o, Ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) : bsup _ f = f o (lt_succ o) :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun _i hi => hf _ _ <| le_of_lt_succ hi) (le_bsup _ _ _)
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_of_mono Ordinal.bsup_succ_of_mono
@[simp]
theorem bsup_zero (f : ∀ a < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : bsup 0 f = 0 :=
bsup_eq_zero_iff.2 fun i hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim
#align ordinal.bsup_zero Ordinal.bsup_zero
theorem bsup_const {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : o ≠ 0) (a : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(bsup.{_, v} o fun _ _ => a) = a :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) (le_bsup _ 0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho))
#align ordinal.bsup_const Ordinal.bsup_const
@[simp]
theorem bsup_one (f : ∀ a < (1 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : bsup 1 f = f 0 zero_lt_one := by
simp_rw [← sup_eq_bsup, sup_unique, familyOfBFamily, familyOfBFamily', typein_one_out]
#align ordinal.bsup_one Ordinal.bsup_one
theorem bsup_le_of_brange_subset {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : bsup.{u, max v w} o f ≤ bsup.{v, max u w} o' g :=
bsup_le fun i hi => by
obtain ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩ := h ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
rw [← hj']
apply le_bsup
#align ordinal.bsup_le_of_brange_subset Ordinal.bsup_le_of_brange_subset
theorem bsup_eq_of_brange_eq {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f = brange o' g) : bsup.{u, max v w} o f = bsup.{v, max u w} o' g :=
(bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_of_brange_eq Ordinal.bsup_eq_of_brange_eq
def lsub {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
sup (succ ∘ f)
#align ordinal.lsub Ordinal.lsub
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (succ ∘ f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub
theorem lsub_le_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
lsub.{_, v} f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i < a := by
convert sup_le_iff.{_, v} (f := succ ∘ f) (a := a) using 2
-- Porting note: `comp_apply` is required.
simp only [comp_apply, succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.lsub_le_iff Ordinal.lsub_le_iff
theorem lsub_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {a} : (∀ i, f i < a) → lsub f ≤ a :=
lsub_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.lsub_le Ordinal.lsub_le
theorem lt_lsub {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) (i) : f i < lsub f :=
succ_le_iff.1 (le_sup _ i)
#align ordinal.lt_lsub Ordinal.lt_lsub
theorem lt_lsub_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
a < lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@lsub_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_lsub_iff Ordinal.lt_lsub_iff
theorem sup_le_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : sup.{_, v} f ≤ lsub.{_, v} f :=
sup_le fun i => (lt_lsub f i).le
#align ordinal.sup_le_lsub Ordinal.sup_le_lsub
theorem lsub_le_sup_succ {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f ≤ succ (sup.{_, v} f) :=
lsub_le fun i => lt_succ_iff.2 (le_sup f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_le_sup_succ Ordinal.lsub_le_sup_succ
theorem sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ∨ succ (sup.{_, v} f) = lsub.{_, v} f := by
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (sup_le_lsub.{_, v} f) with h h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ((succ_le_of_lt h).antisymm (lsub_le_sup_succ f))
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub
theorem sup_succ_le_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (sup.{_, v} f) ≤ lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup.{_, v} f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_contra! hf
exact (succ_le_iff.1 h).ne ((sup_le_lsub f).antisymm (lsub_le (ne_sup_iff_lt_sup.1 hf)))
rintro ⟨_, hf⟩
rw [succ_le_iff, ← hf]
exact lt_lsub _ _
#align ordinal.sup_succ_le_lsub Ordinal.sup_succ_le_lsub
theorem sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (sup.{_, v} f) = lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup.{_, v} f :=
(lsub_le_sup_succ f).le_iff_eq.symm.trans (sup_succ_le_lsub f)
#align ordinal.sup_succ_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_succ_eq_lsub
theorem sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∀ a < lsub.{_, v} f, succ a < lsub.{_, v} f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hf => le_antisymm (sup_le_lsub f) (lsub_le fun i => ?_)⟩
· rw [← h]
exact fun a => sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup fun i => (lsub_le_iff.1 (le_of_eq h.symm) i).ne
by_contra! hle
have heq := (sup_succ_eq_lsub f).2 ⟨i, le_antisymm (le_sup _ _) hle⟩
have :=
hf _
(by
rw [← heq]
exact lt_succ (sup f))
rw [heq] at this
exact this.false
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ
theorem sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup.{_, v} f :=
⟨fun h i => by
rw [h]
apply lt_lsub, fun h => le_antisymm (sup_le_lsub f) (lsub_le h)⟩
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem lsub_empty {ι} [h : IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : lsub f = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, lsub_le_iff]
exact h.elim
#align ordinal.lsub_empty Ordinal.lsub_empty
theorem lsub_pos {ι : Type u} [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : 0 < lsub.{_, v} f :=
h.elim fun i => (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt (lt_lsub f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_pos Ordinal.lsub_pos
@[simp]
theorem lsub_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨fun i => ?_⟩, fun h => @lsub_empty _ h _⟩
have := @lsub_pos.{_, v} _ ⟨i⟩ f
rw [h] at this
exact this.false
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.lsub_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem lsub_const {ι} [Nonempty ι] (o : Ordinal) : (lsub fun _ : ι => o) = succ o :=
sup_const (succ o)
#align ordinal.lsub_const Ordinal.lsub_const
@[simp]
theorem lsub_unique {ι} [Unique ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : lsub f = succ (f default) :=
sup_unique _
#align ordinal.lsub_unique Ordinal.lsub_unique
theorem lsub_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) : lsub.{u, max v w} f ≤ lsub.{v, max u w} g :=
sup_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} (by convert Set.image_subset succ h <;> apply Set.range_comp)
#align ordinal.lsub_le_of_range_subset Ordinal.lsub_le_of_range_subset
theorem lsub_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f = Set.range g) : lsub.{u, max v w} f = lsub.{v, max u w} g :=
(lsub_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (lsub_le_of_range_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_of_range_eq Ordinal.lsub_eq_of_range_eq
@[simp]
theorem lsub_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : Sum α β → Ordinal) :
lsub.{max u v, w} f =
max (lsub.{u, max v w} fun a => f (Sum.inl a)) (lsub.{v, max u w} fun b => f (Sum.inr b)) :=
sup_sum _
#align ordinal.lsub_sum Ordinal.lsub_sum
theorem lsub_not_mem_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f ∉ Set.range f := fun ⟨i, h⟩ =>
h.not_lt (lt_lsub f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_not_mem_range Ordinal.lsub_not_mem_range
theorem nonempty_compl_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : (Set.range f)ᶜ.Nonempty :=
⟨_, lsub_not_mem_range.{_, v} f⟩
#align ordinal.nonempty_compl_range Ordinal.nonempty_compl_range
@[simp]
theorem lsub_typein (o : Ordinal) : lsub.{u, u} (typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop)) = o :=
(lsub_le.{u, u} typein_lt_self).antisymm
(by
by_contra! h
-- Porting note: `nth_rw` → `conv_rhs` & `rw`
conv_rhs at h => rw [← type_lt o]
simpa [typein_enum] using lt_lsub.{u, u} (typein (· < ·)) (enum (· < ·) _ h))
#align ordinal.lsub_typein Ordinal.lsub_typein
theorem sup_typein_limit {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a, a < o → succ a < o) :
sup.{u, u} (typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop)) = o := by
-- Porting note: `rwa` → `rw` & `assumption`
rw [(sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ.{u, u} (typein (· < ·))).2] <;> rw [lsub_typein o]; assumption
#align ordinal.sup_typein_limit Ordinal.sup_typein_limit
@[simp]
theorem sup_typein_succ {o : Ordinal} :
sup.{u, u} (typein ((· < ·) : (succ o).out.α → (succ o).out.α → Prop)) = o := by
cases'
sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub.{u, u}
(typein ((· < ·) : (succ o).out.α → (succ o).out.α → Prop)) with
h h
· rw [sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ] at h
simp only [lsub_typein] at h
exact (h o (lt_succ o)).false.elim
rw [← succ_eq_succ_iff, h]
apply lsub_typein
#align ordinal.sup_typein_succ Ordinal.sup_typein_succ
def blsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
bsup.{_, v} o fun a ha => succ (f a ha)
#align ordinal.blsub Ordinal.blsub
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_blsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(bsup.{_, v} o fun a ha => succ (f a ha)) = blsub.{_, v} o f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub
theorem lsub_eq_blsub' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = blsub.{_, v} o f :=
sup_eq_bsup'.{_, v} r ho fun a ha => succ (f a ha)
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub' Ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub'
theorem lsub_eq_lsub {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
[IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) := by
rw [lsub_eq_blsub', lsub_eq_blsub']
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_lsub Ordinal.lsub_eq_lsub
@[simp]
theorem lsub_eq_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) = blsub.{_, v} o f :=
lsub_eq_blsub' _ _ _
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub Ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub
@[simp]
theorem blsub_eq_lsub' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
bsup_eq_sup'.{_, v} r (succ ∘ f)
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub' Ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub'
theorem blsub_eq_blsub {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι r']
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r' f) := by
rw [blsub_eq_lsub', blsub_eq_lsub']
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_blsub Ordinal.blsub_eq_blsub
@[simp]
theorem blsub_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
blsub_eq_lsub' _ _
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub Ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub
@[congr]
theorem blsub_congr {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o₁, Ordinal.{max u v}) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
blsub.{_, v} o₁ f = blsub.{_, v} o₂ fun a h => f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm) := by
subst ho
-- Porting note: `rfl` is required.
rfl
#align ordinal.blsub_congr Ordinal.blsub_congr
theorem blsub_le_iff {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
blsub.{_, v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < a := by
convert bsup_le_iff.{_, v} (f := fun a ha => succ (f a ha)) (a := a) using 2
simp_rw [succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.blsub_le_iff Ordinal.blsub_le_iff
theorem blsub_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal} {a} : (∀ i h, f i h < a) → blsub o f ≤ a :=
blsub_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.blsub_le Ordinal.blsub_le
theorem lt_blsub {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) (i h) : f i h < blsub o f :=
blsub_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
#align ordinal.lt_blsub Ordinal.lt_blsub
theorem lt_blsub_iff {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
a < blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a ≤ f i hi := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@blsub_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_blsub_iff Ordinal.lt_blsub_iff
theorem bsup_le_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f ≤ blsub.{_, v} o f :=
bsup_le fun i h => (lt_blsub f i h).le
#align ordinal.bsup_le_blsub Ordinal.bsup_le_blsub
theorem blsub_le_bsup_succ {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} o f ≤ succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) :=
blsub_le fun i h => lt_succ_iff.2 (le_bsup f i h)
#align ordinal.blsub_le_bsup_succ Ordinal.blsub_le_bsup_succ
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f = blsub.{_, v} o f ∨ succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) = blsub.{_, v} o f := by
rw [← sup_eq_bsup, ← lsub_eq_blsub]
exact sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub _
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub
theorem bsup_succ_le_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) ≤ blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = bsup.{_, v} o f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_contra! hf
exact
ne_of_lt (succ_le_iff.1 h)
(le_antisymm (bsup_le_blsub f) (blsub_le (lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup.1 hf)))
rintro ⟨_, _, hf⟩
rw [succ_le_iff, ← hf]
exact lt_blsub _ _ _
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_le_blsub Ordinal.bsup_succ_le_blsub
theorem bsup_succ_eq_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) = blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
(blsub_le_bsup_succ f).le_iff_eq.symm.trans (bsup_succ_le_blsub f)
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_eq_blsub Ordinal.bsup_succ_eq_blsub
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,853 | 1,856 | theorem bsup_eq_blsub_iff_succ {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f = blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∀ a < blsub.{_, v} o f, succ a < blsub.{_, v} o f := by |
rw [← sup_eq_bsup, ← lsub_eq_blsub]
apply sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β] [OrderClosedTopology β] [Nonempty γ]
theorem Monotone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt' {f : α → β} {A : Set α} (Cf : ContinuousAt f (sSup A))
(Mf : Monotone f) (A_nonemp : A.Nonempty) (A_bdd : BddAbove A := by bddDefault) :
f (sSup A) = sSup (f '' A) :=
--This is a particular case of the more general `IsLUB.isLUB_of_tendsto`
.symm <| ((isLUB_csSup A_nonemp A_bdd).isLUB_of_tendsto (Mf.monotoneOn _) A_nonemp <|
Cf.mono_left inf_le_left).csSup_eq (A_nonemp.image f)
#align monotone.map_Sup_of_continuous_at' Monotone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt'
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/Monotone.lean | 41 | 45 | theorem Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {f : α → β} {g : ι → α}
(Cf : ContinuousAt f (iSup g)) (Mf : Monotone f)
(bdd : BddAbove (range g) := by | bddDefault) : f (⨆ i, g i) = ⨆ i, f (g i) := by
rw [iSup, Monotone.map_sSup_of_continuousAt' Cf Mf (range_nonempty g) bdd, ← range_comp, iSup]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Init.Core
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois
#align_import number_theory.cyclotomic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4b05d3f4f0601dca8abf99c4ec99187682ed0bba"
open Polynomial Algebra FiniteDimensional Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
#align is_cyclotomic_extension IsCyclotomicExtension
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_adjoin_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_adjoin_eq_top
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_singleton IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_singleton
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.empty IsCyclotomicExtension.empty
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one
variable {A B}
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
-- Porting note: Lean3 is able to infer `A`.
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top
variable (A B)
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· cases' hn with hn hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy) fun x y hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← AlgHom.map_pow, hn.2, AlgHom.map_one]⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.trans IsCyclotomicExtension.trans
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
-- Porting note: `R := A` was not needed.
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.subsingleton_iff IsCyclotomicExtension.subsingleton_iff
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.union_right IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.union_left IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left
variable {n S}
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := H.exists_prim_root hm
refine ⟨ζ ^ (x : ℕ), ?_⟩
convert hζ.pow_of_dvd x.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left (x : ℕ) s)
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, Nat.mul_div_left, PNat.pos]
· refine _root_.eq_top_iff.2 ?_
rw [← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top S A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hx
exact ⟨m, ⟨Or.inr hm.1, hm.2⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.of_union_of_dvd IsCyclotomicExtension.of_union_of_dvd
theorem iff_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine
⟨fun H => of_union_of_dvd A B h hS, fun H => (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact H.exists_prim_root (subset_union_left hs)
· rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, rfl | hm, hxpow⟩ := hx
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy, ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := h y hy
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, pow_mul, hxpow, one_pow]
· exact ⟨m, ⟨hm, hxpow⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_union_of_dvd IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_union_of_dvd
variable (n S)
theorem iff_union_singleton_one :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B := by
obtain hS | rfl := S.eq_empty_or_nonempty.symm
· exact iff_union_of_dvd _ _ (fun s _ => one_dvd _) hS
rw [empty_union]
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ⟨1, by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hs]⟩, ?_⟩
simp [adjoin_singleton_one, empty]
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => (not_mem_empty s hs).elim, ?_⟩
simp [@singleton_one A B _ _ _ H]
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_union_singleton_one IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_union_singleton_one
variable {A B}
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 265 | 268 | theorem singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B := by |
convert (iff_union_singleton_one _ A _).1 (singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top h)
simp
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 468 | 469 | theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by |
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import algebra.invertible from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"722b3b152ddd5e0cf21c0a29787c76596cb6b422"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
class Invertible [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) : Type u where
invOf : α
invOf_mul_self : invOf * a = 1
mul_invOf_self : a * invOf = 1
#align invertible Invertible
prefix:max
"⅟" =>-- This notation has the same precedence as `Inv.inv`.
Invertible.invOf
@[simp]
theorem invOf_mul_self' [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) {_ : Invertible a} : ⅟ a * a = 1 :=
Invertible.invOf_mul_self
theorem invOf_mul_self [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) [Invertible a] : ⅟ a * a = 1 :=
Invertible.invOf_mul_self
#align inv_of_mul_self invOf_mul_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_invOf_self' [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) {_ : Invertible a} : a * ⅟ a = 1 :=
Invertible.mul_invOf_self
theorem mul_invOf_self [Mul α] [One α] (a : α) [Invertible a] : a * ⅟ a = 1 :=
Invertible.mul_invOf_self
#align mul_inv_of_self mul_invOf_self
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Invertible/Defs.lean | 117 | 118 | theorem invOf_mul_self_assoc' [Monoid α] (a b : α) {_ : Invertible a} : ⅟ a * (a * b) = b := by |
rw [← mul_assoc, invOf_mul_self, one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Dual
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {R I J X Y : Set α}
section restrict
@[simps] def restrictIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := R
Indep I := M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ R
indep_empty := ⟨M.empty_indep, empty_subset _⟩
indep_subset := fun I J h hIJ ↦ ⟨h.1.subset hIJ, hIJ.trans h.2⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I I' ⟨hI, hIY⟩ (hIn : ¬ M.Basis' I R) (hI' : M.Basis' I' R)
rw [basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground] at hIn hI'
obtain ⟨B', hB', rfl⟩ := hI'.exists_base
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB, hBIB'⟩ := hI.exists_base_subset_union_base hB'
rw [hB'.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual, diff_inter_diff] at hI'
have hss : M.E \ (B' ∪ (R ∩ M.E)) ⊆ M.E \ (B ∪ (R ∩ M.E)) := by
apply diff_subset_diff_right
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left subset_union_right, union_comm]
exact hBIB'.trans (union_subset_union_left _ (subset_inter hIY hI.subset_ground))
have hi : M✶.Indep (M.E \ (B ∪ (R ∩ M.E))) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists]
exact ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_right subset_union_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
have h_eq := hI'.eq_of_subset_indep hi hss
(diff_subset_diff_right subset_union_right)
rw [h_eq, ← diff_inter_diff, ← hB.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual] at hI'
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.subset_basis_of_subset
(subset_inter hIB (subset_inter hIY hI.subset_ground))
obtain rfl := hI'.indep.eq_of_basis hJ
have hIJ' : I ⊂ B ∩ (R ∩ M.E) := hIJ.ssubset_of_ne (fun he ↦ hIn (by rwa [he]))
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hIJ'
exact ⟨e, ⟨⟨(hBIB' he.1.1).elim (fun h ↦ (he.2 h).elim) id,he.1.2⟩, he.2⟩,
hI'.indep.subset (insert_subset he.1 hIJ), insert_subset he.1.2.1 hIY⟩
indep_maximal := by
rintro A hAX I ⟨hI, _⟩ hIA
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.subset_basis'_of_subset hIA; use J
rw [mem_maximals_setOf_iff, and_iff_left hJ.subset, and_iff_left hIJ,
and_iff_right ⟨hJ.indep, hJ.subset.trans hAX⟩]
exact fun K ⟨⟨hK, _⟩, _, hKA⟩ hJK ↦ hJ.eq_of_subset_indep hK hJK hKA
subset_ground I := And.right
def restrict (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : Matroid α := (M.restrictIndepMatroid R).matroid
scoped infixl:65 " ↾ " => Matroid.restrict
@[simp] theorem restrict_indep_iff : (M ↾ R).Indep I ↔ M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ R := Iff.rfl
theorem Indep.indep_restrict_of_subset (h : M.Indep I) (hIR : I ⊆ R) : (M ↾ R).Indep I :=
restrict_indep_iff.mpr ⟨h,hIR⟩
theorem Indep.of_restrict (hI : (M ↾ R).Indep I) : M.Indep I :=
(restrict_indep_iff.1 hI).1
@[simp] theorem restrict_ground_eq : (M ↾ R).E = R := rfl
theorem restrict_finite {R : Set α} (hR : R.Finite) : (M ↾ R).Finite :=
⟨hR⟩
@[simp] theorem restrict_dep_iff : (M ↾ R).Dep X ↔ ¬ M.Indep X ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [Dep, restrict_indep_iff, restrict_ground_eq]; tauto
@[simp] theorem restrict_ground_eq_self (M : Matroid α) : (M ↾ M.E) = M := by
refine eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl ?_; aesop
theorem restrict_restrict_eq {R₁ R₂ : Set α} (M : Matroid α) (hR : R₂ ⊆ R₁) :
(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂ := by
refine eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl ?_
simp only [restrict_ground_eq, restrict_indep_iff, and_congr_left_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ h _ _ ↦ h.trans hR
@[simp] theorem restrict_idem (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : M ↾ R ↾ R = M ↾ R := by
rw [M.restrict_restrict_eq Subset.rfl]
@[simp] theorem base_restrict_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
(M ↾ X).Base I ↔ M.Basis I X := by
simp_rw [base_iff_maximal_indep, basis_iff', restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hX, and_assoc]
aesop
theorem base_restrict_iff' : (M ↾ X).Base I ↔ M.Basis' I X := by
simp_rw [Basis', base_iff_maximal_indep, mem_maximals_setOf_iff, restrict_indep_iff]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Restrict.lean | 159 | 163 | theorem Basis.restrict_base (h : M.Basis I X) : (M ↾ X).Base I := by |
rw [basis_iff'] at h
simp_rw [base_iff_maximal_indep, restrict_indep_iff, and_imp, and_assoc, and_iff_right h.1.1,
and_iff_right h.1.2.1]
exact fun J hJ hJX hIJ ↦ h.1.2.2 _ hJ hIJ hJX
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Canonical
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Preserves
universe v u w
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [FinitaryPreExtensive C]
class Presieve.Extensive {X : C} (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
arrows_nonempty_isColimit : ∃ (α : Type) (_ : Finite α) (Z : α → C) (π : (a : α) → (Z a ⟶ X)),
R = Presieve.ofArrows Z π ∧ Nonempty (IsColimit (Cofan.mk X π))
instance {X : C} (S : Presieve X) [S.Extensive] : S.hasPullbacks where
has_pullbacks := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨hc⟩⟩ := Presieve.Extensive.arrows_nonempty_isColimit (R := S)
intro _ _ _ _ _ hg
cases hg
apply FinitaryPreExtensive.hasPullbacks_of_is_coproduct hc
open Presieve Opposite
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coherent/ExtensiveSheaves.lean | 52 | 58 | theorem isSheafFor_extensive_of_preservesFiniteProducts {X : C} (S : Presieve X) [S.Extensive]
(F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) [PreservesFiniteProducts F] : S.IsSheafFor F := by |
obtain ⟨α, _, Z, π, rfl, ⟨hc⟩⟩ := Extensive.arrows_nonempty_isColimit (R := S)
have : (ofArrows Z (Cofan.mk X π).inj).hasPullbacks :=
(inferInstance : (ofArrows Z π).hasPullbacks)
cases nonempty_fintype α
exact isSheafFor_of_preservesProduct _ _ hc
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot
#align_import order.filter.small_sets from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
open Filter
open Filter Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace Filter
variable {l l' la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β}
def smallSets (l : Filter α) : Filter (Set α) :=
l.lift' powerset
#align filter.small_sets Filter.smallSets
theorem smallSets_eq_generate {f : Filter α} : f.smallSets = generate (powerset '' f.sets) := by
simp_rw [generate_eq_biInf, smallSets, iInf_image]
rfl
#align filter.small_sets_eq_generate Filter.smallSets_eq_generate
-- TODO: get more properties from the adjunction?
-- TODO: is there a general way to get a lower adjoint for the lift of an upper adjoint?
theorem bind_smallSets_gc :
GaloisConnection (fun L : Filter (Set α) ↦ L.bind principal) smallSets := by
intro L l
simp_rw [smallSets_eq_generate, le_generate_iff, image_subset_iff]
rfl
protected theorem HasBasis.smallSets {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : HasBasis l p s) :
HasBasis l.smallSets p fun i => 𝒫 s i :=
h.lift' monotone_powerset
#align filter.has_basis.small_sets Filter.HasBasis.smallSets
theorem hasBasis_smallSets (l : Filter α) :
HasBasis l.smallSets (fun t : Set α => t ∈ l) powerset :=
l.basis_sets.smallSets
#align filter.has_basis_small_sets Filter.hasBasis_smallSets
theorem tendsto_smallSets_iff {f : α → Set β} :
Tendsto f la lb.smallSets ↔ ∀ t ∈ lb, ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ⊆ t :=
(hasBasis_smallSets lb).tendsto_right_iff
#align filter.tendsto_small_sets_iff Filter.tendsto_smallSets_iff
theorem eventually_smallSets {p : Set α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, p s) ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, ∀ t, t ⊆ s → p t :=
eventually_lift'_iff monotone_powerset
#align filter.eventually_small_sets Filter.eventually_smallSets
theorem eventually_smallSets' {p : Set α → Prop} (hp : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) :
(∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, p s) ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, p s :=
eventually_smallSets.trans <|
exists_congr fun s => Iff.rfl.and ⟨fun H => H s Subset.rfl, fun hs _t ht => hp ht hs⟩
#align filter.eventually_small_sets' Filter.eventually_smallSets'
theorem frequently_smallSets {p : Set α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ s in l.smallSets, p s) ↔ ∀ t ∈ l, ∃ s, s ⊆ t ∧ p s :=
l.hasBasis_smallSets.frequently_iff
#align filter.frequently_small_sets Filter.frequently_smallSets
theorem frequently_smallSets_mem (l : Filter α) : ∃ᶠ s in l.smallSets, s ∈ l :=
frequently_smallSets.2 fun t ht => ⟨t, Subset.rfl, ht⟩
#align filter.frequently_small_sets_mem Filter.frequently_smallSets_mem
@[simp]
lemma tendsto_image_smallSets {f : α → β} :
Tendsto (f '' ·) la.smallSets lb.smallSets ↔ Tendsto f la lb := by
rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff]
refine forall₂_congr fun u hu ↦ ?_
rw [eventually_smallSets' fun s t hst ht ↦ (image_subset _ hst).trans ht]
simp only [image_subset_iff, exists_mem_subset_iff, mem_map]
alias ⟨_, Tendsto.image_smallSets⟩ := tendsto_image_smallSets
theorem HasAntitoneBasis.tendsto_smallSets {ι} [Preorder ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hl : l.HasAntitoneBasis s) : Tendsto s atTop l.smallSets :=
tendsto_smallSets_iff.2 fun _t ht => hl.eventually_subset ht
#align filter.has_antitone_basis.tendsto_small_sets Filter.HasAntitoneBasis.tendsto_smallSets
@[mono]
theorem monotone_smallSets : Monotone (@smallSets α) :=
monotone_lift' monotone_id monotone_const
#align filter.monotone_small_sets Filter.monotone_smallSets
@[simp]
theorem smallSets_bot : (⊥ : Filter α).smallSets = pure ∅ := by
rw [smallSets, lift'_bot, powerset_empty, principal_singleton]
exact monotone_powerset
#align filter.small_sets_bot Filter.smallSets_bot
@[simp]
theorem smallSets_top : (⊤ : Filter α).smallSets = ⊤ := by
rw [smallSets, lift'_top, powerset_univ, principal_univ]
#align filter.small_sets_top Filter.smallSets_top
@[simp]
theorem smallSets_principal (s : Set α) : (𝓟 s).smallSets = 𝓟 (𝒫 s) :=
lift'_principal monotone_powerset
#align filter.small_sets_principal Filter.smallSets_principal
theorem smallSets_comap_eq_comap_image (l : Filter β) (f : α → β) :
(comap f l).smallSets = comap (image f) l.smallSets := by
refine (gc_map_comap _).u_comm_of_l_comm (gc_map_comap _) bind_smallSets_gc bind_smallSets_gc ?_
simp [Function.comp, map_bind, bind_map]
theorem smallSets_comap (l : Filter β) (f : α → β) :
(comap f l).smallSets = l.lift' (powerset ∘ preimage f) :=
comap_lift'_eq2 monotone_powerset
#align filter.small_sets_comap Filter.smallSets_comap
theorem comap_smallSets (l : Filter β) (f : α → Set β) :
comap f l.smallSets = l.lift' (preimage f ∘ powerset) :=
comap_lift'_eq
#align filter.comap_small_sets Filter.comap_smallSets
theorem smallSets_iInf {f : ι → Filter α} : (iInf f).smallSets = ⨅ i, (f i).smallSets :=
lift'_iInf_of_map_univ (powerset_inter _ _) powerset_univ
#align filter.small_sets_infi Filter.smallSets_iInf
theorem smallSets_inf (l₁ l₂ : Filter α) : (l₁ ⊓ l₂).smallSets = l₁.smallSets ⊓ l₂.smallSets :=
lift'_inf _ _ powerset_inter
#align filter.small_sets_inf Filter.smallSets_inf
instance smallSets_neBot (l : Filter α) : NeBot l.smallSets := by
refine (lift'_neBot_iff ?_).2 fun _ _ => powerset_nonempty
exact monotone_powerset
#align filter.small_sets_ne_bot Filter.smallSets_neBot
theorem Tendsto.smallSets_mono {s t : α → Set β} (ht : Tendsto t la lb.smallSets)
(hst : ∀ᶠ x in la, s x ⊆ t x) : Tendsto s la lb.smallSets := by
rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff] at ht ⊢
exact fun u hu => (ht u hu).mp (hst.mono fun _ hst ht => hst.trans ht)
#align filter.tendsto.small_sets_mono Filter.Tendsto.smallSets_mono
theorem Tendsto.of_smallSets {s : α → Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : Tendsto s la lb.smallSets)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in la, f x ∈ s x) : Tendsto f la lb := fun t ht =>
hf.mp <| (tendsto_smallSets_iff.mp hs t ht).mono fun _ h₁ h₂ => h₁ h₂
#align filter.tendsto.of_small_sets Filter.Tendsto.of_smallSets
@[simp]
theorem eventually_smallSets_eventually {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, ∀ᶠ x in l', x ∈ s → p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l ⊓ l', p x :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, ∀ᶠ x in l', x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_smallSets' fun s t hst ht => ht.mono fun x hx hs => hx (hst hs)
_ ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, ∃ t ∈ l', ∀ x, x ∈ t → x ∈ s → p x := by simp only [eventually_iff_exists_mem]
_ ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l ⊓ l', p x := by simp only [eventually_inf, and_comm, mem_inter_iff, ← and_imp]
#align filter.eventually_small_sets_eventually Filter.eventually_smallSets_eventually
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/SmallSets.lean | 182 | 184 | theorem eventually_smallSets_forall {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, ∀ x ∈ s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, p x := by |
simpa only [inf_top_eq, eventually_top] using @eventually_smallSets_eventually α l ⊤ p
|
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.Says
#align_import data.set.intervals.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ba15165bd6927679be7c22d6091a87337e3cd0c"
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
def Ioo (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ioo Set.Ioo
def Ico (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b }
#align set.Ico Set.Ico
def Iio (a : α) :=
{ x | x < a }
#align set.Iio Set.Iio
def Icc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Icc Set.Icc
def Iic (b : α) :=
{ x | x ≤ b }
#align set.Iic Set.Iic
def Ioc (a b : α) :=
{ x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b }
#align set.Ioc Set.Ioc
def Ici (a : α) :=
{ x | a ≤ x }
#align set.Ici Set.Ici
def Ioi (a : α) :=
{ x | a < x }
#align set.Ioi Set.Ioi
theorem Ioo_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x < b } = Ioo a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioo_def Set.Ioo_def
theorem Ico_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x < b } = Ico a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ico_def Set.Ico_def
theorem Iio_def (a : α) : { x | x < a } = Iio a :=
rfl
#align set.Iio_def Set.Iio_def
theorem Icc_def (a b : α) : { x | a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b } = Icc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Icc_def Set.Icc_def
theorem Iic_def (b : α) : { x | x ≤ b } = Iic b :=
rfl
#align set.Iic_def Set.Iic_def
theorem Ioc_def (a b : α) : { x | a < x ∧ x ≤ b } = Ioc a b :=
rfl
#align set.Ioc_def Set.Ioc_def
theorem Ici_def (a : α) : { x | a ≤ x } = Ici a :=
rfl
#align set.Ici_def Set.Ici_def
theorem Ioi_def (a : α) : { x | a < x } = Ioi a :=
rfl
#align set.Ioi_def Set.Ioi_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioo : x ∈ Ioo a b ↔ a < x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioo Set.mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ico : x ∈ Ico a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ico Set.mem_Ico
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iio : x ∈ Iio b ↔ x < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iio Set.mem_Iio
@[simp]
theorem mem_Icc : x ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Icc Set.mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Iic : x ∈ Iic b ↔ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Iic Set.mem_Iic
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioc : x ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < x ∧ x ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioc Set.mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ici : x ∈ Ici a ↔ a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ici Set.mem_Ici
@[simp]
theorem mem_Ioi : x ∈ Ioi a ↔ a < x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_Ioi Set.mem_Ioi
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioo Set.decidableMemIoo
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ico Set.decidableMemIco
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iio Set.decidableMemIio
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Icc Set.decidableMemIcc
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Iic Set.decidableMemIic
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioc Set.decidableMemIoc
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ici Set.decidableMemIci
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
#align set.decidable_mem_Ioi Set.decidableMemIoi
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioo Set.left_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Ico Set.left_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.left_mem_Icc Set.left_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.left_mem_Ioc Set.left_mem_Ioc
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
#align set.left_mem_Ici Set.left_mem_Ici
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioo Set.right_mem_Ioo
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
#align set.right_mem_Ico Set.right_mem_Ico
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Icc Set.right_mem_Icc
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
#align set.right_mem_Ioc Set.right_mem_Ioc
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 222 | 222 | theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Basic
#align_import algebra.big_operators.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6c5f73fd6f6cc83122788a80a27cdd54663609f4"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {F ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] [CommMonoid β] {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} {m : Multiset ι} {f g : ι → α}
@[to_additive
"Sum of a multiset given a commutative additive monoid structure on `α`.
`sum {a, b, c} = a + b + c`"]
def prod : Multiset α → α :=
foldr (· * ·) (fun x y z => by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1
#align multiset.prod Multiset.prod
#align multiset.sum Multiset.sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldr (s : Multiset α) :
prod s = foldr (· * ·) (fun x y z => by simp [mul_left_comm]) 1 s :=
rfl
#align multiset.prod_eq_foldr Multiset.prod_eq_foldr
#align multiset.sum_eq_foldr Multiset.sum_eq_foldr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_foldl (s : Multiset α) :
prod s = foldl (· * ·) (fun x y z => by simp [mul_right_comm]) 1 s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).trans (by simp [mul_comm])
#align multiset.prod_eq_foldl Multiset.prod_eq_foldl
#align multiset.sum_eq_foldl Multiset.sum_eq_foldl
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem prod_coe (l : List α) : prod ↑l = l.prod :=
prod_eq_foldl _
#align multiset.coe_prod Multiset.prod_coe
#align multiset.coe_sum Multiset.sum_coe
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Multiset.lean | 66 | 68 | theorem prod_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.prod = s.prod := by |
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toList s]
rw [prod_coe]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
#align_import topology.shrinking_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
open Set Function
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
variable {ι X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [NormalSpace X]
namespace ShrinkingLemma
-- the trivial refinement needs `u` to be a covering
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet. @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
@[ext] structure PartialRefinement (u : ι → Set X) (s : Set X) where
toFun : ι → Set X
carrier : Set ι
protected isOpen : ∀ i, IsOpen (toFun i)
subset_iUnion : s ⊆ ⋃ i, toFun i
closure_subset : ∀ {i}, i ∈ carrier → closure (toFun i) ⊆ u i
apply_eq : ∀ {i}, i ∉ carrier → toFun i = u i
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement
namespace PartialRefinement
variable {u : ι → Set X} {s : Set X}
instance : CoeFun (PartialRefinement u s) fun _ => ι → Set X := ⟨toFun⟩
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.subset_Union ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.subset_iUnion
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.closure_subset ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.closure_subset
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.apply_eq ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.apply_eq
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.is_open ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.isOpen
protected theorem subset (v : PartialRefinement u s) (i : ι) : v i ⊆ u i :=
if h : i ∈ v.carrier then subset_closure.trans (v.closure_subset h) else (v.apply_eq h).le
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.subset ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.subset
instance : PartialOrder (PartialRefinement u s) where
le v₁ v₂ := v₁.carrier ⊆ v₂.carrier ∧ ∀ i ∈ v₁.carrier, v₁ i = v₂ i
le_refl v := ⟨Subset.refl _, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
le_trans v₁ v₂ v₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans h₁₂.1 h₂₃.1, fun i hi => (h₁₂.2 i hi).trans (h₂₃.2 i <| h₁₂.1 hi)⟩
le_antisymm v₁ v₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ :=
have hc : v₁.carrier = v₂.carrier := Subset.antisymm h₁₂.1 h₂₁.1
PartialRefinement.ext _ _
(funext fun x =>
if hx : x ∈ v₁.carrier then h₁₂.2 _ hx
else (v₁.apply_eq hx).trans (Eq.symm <| v₂.apply_eq <| hc ▸ hx))
hc
theorem apply_eq_of_chain {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} (hc : IsChain (· ≤ ·) c) {v₁ v₂}
(h₁ : v₁ ∈ c) (h₂ : v₂ ∈ c) {i} (hi₁ : i ∈ v₁.carrier) (hi₂ : i ∈ v₂.carrier) :
v₁ i = v₂ i :=
(hc.total h₁ h₂).elim (fun hle => hle.2 _ hi₁) (fun hle => (hle.2 _ hi₂).symm)
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.apply_eq_of_chain ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.apply_eq_of_chain
def chainSupCarrier (c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)) : Set ι :=
⋃ v ∈ c, carrier v
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.chain_Sup_carrier ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.chainSupCarrier
def find (c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)) (ne : c.Nonempty) (i : ι) : PartialRefinement u s :=
if hi : ∃ v ∈ c, i ∈ carrier v then hi.choose else ne.some
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.find ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.find
theorem find_mem {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} (i : ι) (ne : c.Nonempty) : find c ne i ∈ c := by
rw [find]
split_ifs with h
exacts [h.choose_spec.1, ne.some_mem]
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.find_mem ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.find_mem
theorem mem_find_carrier_iff {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} {i : ι} (ne : c.Nonempty) :
i ∈ (find c ne i).carrier ↔ i ∈ chainSupCarrier c := by
rw [find]
split_ifs with h
· have := h.choose_spec
exact iff_of_true this.2 (mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨_, this.1, this.2⟩)
· push_neg at h
refine iff_of_false (h _ ne.some_mem) ?_
simpa only [chainSupCarrier, mem_iUnion₂, not_exists]
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.mem_find_carrier_iff ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.mem_find_carrier_iff
theorem find_apply_of_mem {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} (hc : IsChain (· ≤ ·) c)
(ne : c.Nonempty) {i v} (hv : v ∈ c) (hi : i ∈ carrier v) : find c ne i i = v i :=
apply_eq_of_chain hc (find_mem _ _) hv ((mem_find_carrier_iff _).2 <| mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨v, hv, hi⟩)
hi
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.find_apply_of_mem ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.find_apply_of_mem
def chainSup (c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)) (hc : IsChain (· ≤ ·) c) (ne : c.Nonempty)
(hfin : ∀ x ∈ s, { i | x ∈ u i }.Finite) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, u i) : PartialRefinement u s where
toFun i := find c ne i i
carrier := chainSupCarrier c
isOpen i := (find _ _ _).isOpen i
subset_iUnion x hxs := mem_iUnion.2 <| by
rcases em (∃ i, i ∉ chainSupCarrier c ∧ x ∈ u i) with (⟨i, hi, hxi⟩ | hx)
· use i
simpa only [(find c ne i).apply_eq (mt (mem_find_carrier_iff _).1 hi)]
· simp_rw [not_exists, not_and, not_imp_not, chainSupCarrier, mem_iUnion₂] at hx
haveI : Nonempty (PartialRefinement u s) := ⟨ne.some⟩
choose! v hvc hiv using hx
rcases (hfin x hxs).exists_maximal_wrt v _ (mem_iUnion.1 (hU hxs)) with
⟨i, hxi : x ∈ u i, hmax : ∀ j, x ∈ u j → v i ≤ v j → v i = v j⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 ((v i).subset_iUnion hxs) with ⟨j, hj⟩
use j
have hj' : x ∈ u j := (v i).subset _ hj
have : v j ≤ v i := (hc.total (hvc _ hxi) (hvc _ hj')).elim (fun h => (hmax j hj' h).ge) id
simpa only [find_apply_of_mem hc ne (hvc _ hxi) (this.1 <| hiv _ hj')]
closure_subset hi := (find c ne _).closure_subset ((mem_find_carrier_iff _).2 hi)
apply_eq hi := (find c ne _).apply_eq (mt (mem_find_carrier_iff _).1 hi)
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.chain_Sup ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.chainSup
theorem le_chainSup {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} (hc : IsChain (· ≤ ·) c) (ne : c.Nonempty)
(hfin : ∀ x ∈ s, { i | x ∈ u i }.Finite) (hU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, u i) {v} (hv : v ∈ c) :
v ≤ chainSup c hc ne hfin hU :=
⟨fun _ hi => mem_biUnion hv hi, fun _ hi => (find_apply_of_mem hc _ hv hi).symm⟩
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.le_chain_Sup ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.le_chainSup
| Mathlib/Topology/ShrinkingLemma.lean | 174 | 204 | theorem exists_gt (v : PartialRefinement u s) (hs : IsClosed s) (i : ι) (hi : i ∉ v.carrier) :
∃ v' : PartialRefinement u s, v < v' := by |
have I : (s ∩ ⋂ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), (v j)ᶜ) ⊆ v i := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_inter_iff, mem_iInter, and_imp]
intro x hxs H
rcases mem_iUnion.1 (v.subset_iUnion hxs) with ⟨j, hj⟩
exact (em (j = i)).elim (fun h => h ▸ hj) fun h => (H j h hj).elim
have C : IsClosed (s ∩ ⋂ (j) (_ : j ≠ i), (v j)ᶜ) :=
IsClosed.inter hs (isClosed_biInter fun _ _ => isClosed_compl_iff.2 <| v.isOpen _)
rcases normal_exists_closure_subset C (v.isOpen i) I with ⟨vi, ovi, hvi, cvi⟩
refine ⟨⟨update v i vi, insert i v.carrier, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl| hne) <;> simp [*, v.isOpen]
· refine fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ?_
rcases em (∃ j ≠ i, x ∈ v j) with (⟨j, hji, hj⟩ | h)
· use j
rwa [update_noteq hji]
· push_neg at h
use i
rw [update_same]
exact hvi ⟨hx, mem_biInter h⟩
· rintro j (rfl | hj)
· rwa [update_same, ← v.apply_eq hi]
· rw [update_noteq (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi)]
exact v.closure_subset hj
· intro j hj
rw [mem_insert_iff, not_or] at hj
rw [update_noteq hj.1, v.apply_eq hj.2]
· refine ⟨subset_insert _ _, fun j hj => ?_⟩
exact (update_noteq (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hi) _ _).symm
· exact fun hle => hi (hle.1 <| mem_insert _ _)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Central
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
#align_import data.nat.choose.factorization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc9db541168768af03fe228703e758e649afdbfc"
namespace Nat
variable {p n k : ℕ}
theorem factorization_choose_le_log : (choose n k).factorization p ≤ log p n := by
by_cases h : (choose n k).factorization p = 0
· simp [h]
have hp : p.Prime := Not.imp_symm (choose n k).factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime h
have hkn : k ≤ n := by
refine le_of_not_lt fun hnk => h ?_
simp [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk]
rw [factorization_def _ hp, @padicValNat_def _ ⟨hp⟩ _ (choose_pos hkn)]
simp only [hp.multiplicity_choose hkn (lt_add_one _), PartENat.get_natCast]
exact (Finset.card_filter_le _ _).trans (le_of_eq (Nat.card_Ico _ _))
#align nat.factorization_choose_le_log Nat.factorization_choose_le_log
theorem pow_factorization_choose_le (hn : 0 < n) : p ^ (choose n k).factorization p ≤ n :=
pow_le_of_le_log hn.ne' factorization_choose_le_log
#align nat.pow_factorization_choose_le Nat.pow_factorization_choose_le
theorem factorization_choose_le_one (p_large : n < p ^ 2) : (choose n k).factorization p ≤ 1 := by
apply factorization_choose_le_log.trans
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn0); · simp
exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.1 (log_lt_of_lt_pow hn0 p_large)
#align nat.factorization_choose_le_one Nat.factorization_choose_le_one
theorem factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul (hp' : p ≠ 2) (hk : p ≤ k) (hk' : p ≤ n - k)
(hn : n < 3 * p) : (choose n k).factorization p = 0 := by
cases' em' p.Prime with hp hp
· exact factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime (choose n k) hp
cases' lt_or_le n k with hnk hkn
· simp [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk]
rw [factorization_def _ hp, @padicValNat_def _ ⟨hp⟩ _ (choose_pos hkn)]
simp only [hp.multiplicity_choose hkn (lt_add_one _), PartENat.get_natCast, Finset.card_eq_zero,
Finset.filter_eq_empty_iff, not_le]
intro i hi
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Finset.mem_Ico.mp hi).1 with (rfl | hi)
· rw [pow_one, ← add_lt_add_iff_left (2 * p), ← succ_mul, two_mul, add_add_add_comm]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt
(add_le_add
(add_le_add_right (le_mul_of_one_le_right' ((one_le_div_iff hp.pos).mpr hk)) (k % p))
(add_le_add_right (le_mul_of_one_le_right' ((one_le_div_iff hp.pos).mpr hk'))
((n - k) % p)))
(by rwa [div_add_mod, div_add_mod, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hkn])
· replace hn : n < p ^ i := by
have : 3 ≤ p := lt_of_le_of_ne hp.two_le hp'.symm
calc
n < 3 * p := hn
_ ≤ p * p := mul_le_mul_right' this p
_ = p ^ 2 := (sq p).symm
_ ≤ p ^ i := pow_le_pow_right hp.one_lt.le hi
rwa [mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt hkn hn), mod_eq_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt tsub_le_self hn),
add_tsub_cancel_of_le hkn]
#align nat.factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul Nat.factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul
theorem factorization_centralBinom_of_two_mul_self_lt_three_mul (n_big : 2 < n) (p_le_n : p ≤ n)
(big : 2 * n < 3 * p) : (centralBinom n).factorization p = 0 := by
refine factorization_choose_of_lt_three_mul ?_ p_le_n (p_le_n.trans ?_) big
· omega
· rw [two_mul, add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align nat.factorization_central_binom_of_two_mul_self_lt_three_mul Nat.factorization_centralBinom_of_two_mul_self_lt_three_mul
theorem factorization_factorial_eq_zero_of_lt (h : n < p) : (factorial n).factorization p = 0 := by
induction' n with n hn; · simp
rw [factorial_succ, factorization_mul n.succ_ne_zero n.factorial_ne_zero, Finsupp.coe_add,
Pi.add_apply, hn (lt_of_succ_lt h), add_zero, factorization_eq_zero_of_lt h]
#align nat.factorization_factorial_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.factorization_factorial_eq_zero_of_lt
theorem factorization_choose_eq_zero_of_lt (h : n < p) : (choose n k).factorization p = 0 := by
by_cases hnk : n < k; · simp [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk]
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (le_of_not_lt hnk),
factorization_div (factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (le_of_not_lt hnk)), Finsupp.coe_tsub,
Pi.sub_apply, factorization_factorial_eq_zero_of_lt h, zero_tsub]
#align nat.factorization_choose_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.factorization_choose_eq_zero_of_lt
theorem factorization_centralBinom_eq_zero_of_two_mul_lt (h : 2 * n < p) :
(centralBinom n).factorization p = 0 :=
factorization_choose_eq_zero_of_lt h
#align nat.factorization_central_binom_eq_zero_of_two_mul_lt Nat.factorization_centralBinom_eq_zero_of_two_mul_lt
theorem le_two_mul_of_factorization_centralBinom_pos
(h_pos : 0 < (centralBinom n).factorization p) : p ≤ 2 * n :=
le_of_not_lt (pos_iff_ne_zero.mp h_pos ∘ factorization_centralBinom_eq_zero_of_two_mul_lt)
#align nat.le_two_mul_of_factorization_central_binom_pos Nat.le_two_mul_of_factorization_centralBinom_pos
theorem prod_pow_factorization_choose (n k : ℕ) (hkn : k ≤ n) :
(∏ p ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), p ^ (Nat.choose n k).factorization p) = choose n k := by
conv => -- Porting note: was `nth_rw_rhs`
rhs
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (choose_pos hkn).ne']
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset
· intro p hp
rw [Finset.mem_range]
contrapose! hp
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Classical.not_not, factorization_choose_eq_zero_of_lt hp]
· intro p _ h2
simp [Classical.not_not.1 (mt Finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 h2)]
#align nat.prod_pow_factorization_choose Nat.prod_pow_factorization_choose
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Factorization.lean | 144 | 147 | theorem prod_pow_factorization_centralBinom (n : ℕ) :
(∏ p ∈ Finset.range (2 * n + 1), p ^ (centralBinom n).factorization p) = centralBinom n := by |
apply prod_pow_factorization_choose
omega
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
#align_import information_theory.hamming from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"17ef379e997badd73e5eabb4d38f11919ab3c4b3"
section HammingDistNorm
open Finset Function
variable {α ι : Type*} {β : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (β i)]
variable {γ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, DecidableEq (γ i)]
def hammingDist (x y : ∀ i, β i) : ℕ :=
(univ.filter fun i => x i ≠ y i).card
#align hamming_dist hammingDist
@[simp]
theorem hammingDist_self (x : ∀ i, β i) : hammingDist x x = 0 := by
rw [hammingDist, card_eq_zero, filter_eq_empty_iff]
exact fun _ _ H => H rfl
#align hamming_dist_self hammingDist_self
theorem hammingDist_nonneg {x y : ∀ i, β i} : 0 ≤ hammingDist x y :=
zero_le _
#align hamming_dist_nonneg hammingDist_nonneg
theorem hammingDist_comm (x y : ∀ i, β i) : hammingDist x y = hammingDist y x := by
simp_rw [hammingDist, ne_comm]
#align hamming_dist_comm hammingDist_comm
theorem hammingDist_triangle (x y z : ∀ i, β i) :
hammingDist x z ≤ hammingDist x y + hammingDist y z := by
classical
unfold hammingDist
refine le_trans (card_mono ?_) (card_union_le _ _)
rw [← filter_or]
exact monotone_filter_right _ fun i h ↦ (h.ne_or_ne _).imp_right Ne.symm
#align hamming_dist_triangle hammingDist_triangle
| Mathlib/InformationTheory/Hamming.lean | 71 | 74 | theorem hammingDist_triangle_left (x y z : ∀ i, β i) :
hammingDist x y ≤ hammingDist z x + hammingDist z y := by |
rw [hammingDist_comm z]
exact hammingDist_triangle _ _ _
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.subgraph from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c6ef6387ede9983aee397d442974e61f89dfd87b"
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
@[ext]
structure Subgraph {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) where
verts : Set V
Adj : V → V → Prop
adj_sub : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → G.Adj v w
edge_vert : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → v ∈ verts
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph -- Porting note: Originally `by obviously`
#align simple_graph.subgraph SimpleGraph.Subgraph
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph.Subgraph (Adj → adj)
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} {W : Type v}
@[simps]
protected def singletonSubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v}
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm _ _ := False.elim
#align simple_graph.singleton_subgraph SimpleGraph.singletonSubgraph
@[simps]
def subgraphOfAdj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v, w}
Adj a b := s(v, w) = s(a, b)
adj_sub h := by
rw [← G.mem_edgeSet, ← h]
exact hvw
edge_vert {a b} h := by
apply_fun fun e ↦ a ∈ e at h
simp only [Sym2.mem_iff, true_or, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h
exact h
#align simple_graph.subgraph_of_adj SimpleGraph.subgraphOfAdj
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph} {a b : V}
protected theorem loopless (G' : Subgraph G) : Irreflexive G'.Adj :=
fun v h ↦ G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub h)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.loopless SimpleGraph.Subgraph.loopless
theorem adj_comm (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : G'.Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj w v :=
⟨fun x ↦ G'.symm x, fun x ↦ G'.symm x⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj_comm SimpleGraph.Subgraph.adj_comm
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (G' : Subgraph G) {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj_symm SimpleGraph.Subgraph.adj_symm
protected theorem Adj.symm {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.symm SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.symm
protected theorem Adj.adj_sub {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
H.adj_sub h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.adj_sub SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.adj_sub
protected theorem Adj.fst_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ∈ H.verts :=
H.edge_vert h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.fst_mem SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.fst_mem
protected theorem Adj.snd_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : v ∈ H.verts :=
h.symm.fst_mem
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.snd_mem SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.snd_mem
protected theorem Adj.ne {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ≠ v :=
h.adj_sub.ne
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.ne SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.ne
@[simps]
protected def coe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph G'.verts where
Adj v w := G'.Adj v w
symm _ _ h := G'.symm h
loopless v h := loopless G v (G'.adj_sub h)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_adj_sub (G' : Subgraph G) (u v : G'.verts) (h : G'.coe.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.coe_adj_sub SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coe_adj_sub
-- Given `h : H.Adj u v`, then `h.coe : H.coe.Adj ⟨u, _⟩ ⟨v, _⟩`.
protected theorem Adj.coe {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) :
H.coe.Adj ⟨u, H.edge_vert h⟩ ⟨v, H.edge_vert h.symm⟩ := h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.coe
def IsSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, v ∈ G'.verts
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_spanning SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsSpanning
theorem isSpanning_iff {G' : Subgraph G} : G'.IsSpanning ↔ G'.verts = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_spanning_iff SimpleGraph.Subgraph.isSpanning_iff
@[simps]
protected def spanningCoe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := G'.Adj
symm := G'.symm
loopless v hv := G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub hv)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe
@[simp]
theorem Adj.of_spanningCoe {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : G'.verts} (h : G'.spanningCoe.Adj u v) :
G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.of_spanning_coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.of_spanningCoe
theorem spanningCoe_inj : G₁.spanningCoe = G₂.spanningCoe ↔ G₁.Adj = G₂.Adj := by
simp [Subgraph.spanningCoe]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_inj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe_inj
@[simps]
def spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.spanningCoe ≃g G'.coe where
toFun v := ⟨v, h v⟩
invFun v := v
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_equiv_coe_of_spanning SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning
def IsInduced (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ {v w : V}, v ∈ G'.verts → w ∈ G'.verts → G.Adj v w → G'.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_induced SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsInduced
def support (H : Subgraph G) : Set V := Rel.dom H.Adj
#align simple_graph.subgraph.support SimpleGraph.Subgraph.support
theorem mem_support (H : Subgraph G) {v : V} : v ∈ H.support ↔ ∃ w, H.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_support SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_support
theorem support_subset_verts (H : Subgraph G) : H.support ⊆ H.verts :=
fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ H.edge_vert h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.support_subset_verts SimpleGraph.Subgraph.support_subset_verts
def neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set V := {w | G'.Adj v w}
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet
theorem neighborSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
fun _ ↦ G'.adj_sub
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_subset SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_subset
theorem neighborSet_subset_verts (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G'.verts :=
fun _ h ↦ G'.edge_vert (adj_symm G' h)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_subset_verts SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_subset_verts
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : w ∈ G'.neighborSet v ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_neighbor_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_neighborSet
def coeNeighborSetEquiv {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) :
G'.coe.neighborSet v ≃ G'.neighborSet v where
toFun w := ⟨w, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨⟨w, G'.edge_vert (G'.adj_symm w.2)⟩, w.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.coe_neighbor_set_equiv SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coeNeighborSetEquiv
def edgeSet (G' : Subgraph G) : Set (Sym2 V) := Sym2.fromRel G'.symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet
theorem edgeSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) : G'.edgeSet ⊆ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ G'.adj_sub)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_subset SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_subset
@[simp]
theorem mem_edgeSet {G' : Subgraph G} {v w : V} : s(v, w) ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_edgeSet
theorem mem_verts_if_mem_edge {G' : Subgraph G} {e : Sym2 V} {v : V} (he : e ∈ G'.edgeSet)
(hv : v ∈ e) : v ∈ G'.verts := by
revert hv
refine Sym2.ind (fun v w he ↦ ?_) e he
intro hv
rcases Sym2.mem_iff.mp hv with (rfl | rfl)
· exact G'.edge_vert he
· exact G'.edge_vert (G'.symm he)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_verts_if_mem_edge SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_verts_if_mem_edge
def incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) := {e ∈ G'.edgeSet | v ∈ e}
#align simple_graph.subgraph.incidence_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) :
G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.incidenceSet v :=
fun _ h ↦ ⟨G'.edgeSet_subset h.1, h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.incidence_set_subset_incidence_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G'.edgeSet :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1
#align simple_graph.subgraph.incidence_set_subset SimpleGraph.Subgraph.incidenceSet_subset
abbrev vert (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) (h : v ∈ G'.verts) : G'.verts := ⟨v, h⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.vert SimpleGraph.Subgraph.vert
def copy (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : Subgraph G where
verts := V''
Adj := adj'
adj_sub := hadj.symm ▸ G'.adj_sub
edge_vert := hV.symm ▸ hadj.symm ▸ G'.edge_vert
symm := hadj.symm ▸ G'.symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.copy SimpleGraph.Subgraph.copy
theorem copy_eq (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : G'.copy V'' hV adj' hadj = G' :=
Subgraph.ext _ _ hV hadj
#align simple_graph.subgraph.copy_eq SimpleGraph.Subgraph.copy_eq
instance : Sup G.Subgraph where
sup G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊔ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => Or.elim hab (fun h => G₁.adj_sub h) fun h => G₂.adj_sub h
edge_vert := Or.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => Or.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
instance : Inf G.Subgraph where
inf G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊓ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => G₁.adj_sub hab.1
edge_vert := And.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
instance : Top G.Subgraph where
top :=
{ verts := Set.univ
Adj := G.Adj
adj_sub := id
edge_vert := @fun v _ _ => Set.mem_univ v
symm := G.symm }
instance : Bot G.Subgraph where
bot :=
{ verts := ∅
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm := fun _ _ => id }
instance : SupSet G.Subgraph where
sSup s :=
{ verts := ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => ∃ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b
adj_sub := by
rintro a b ⟨G', -, hab⟩
exact G'.adj_sub hab
edge_vert := by
rintro a b ⟨G', hG', hab⟩
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem hG' (G'.edge_vert hab)
symm := fun a b h => by simpa [adj_comm] using h }
instance : InfSet G.Subgraph where
sInf s :=
{ verts := ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G'⦄, G' ∈ s → Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b
adj_sub := And.right
edge_vert := fun hab => Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem fun G' hG' => G'.edge_vert <| hab.1 hG'
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) G.adj_symm }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∨ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.sup_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sup_adj
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∧ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.inf_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.inf_adj
@[simp]
theorem top_adj : (⊤ : Subgraph G).Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.top_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.top_adj
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_adj : ¬ (⊥ : Subgraph G).Adj a b :=
not_false
#align simple_graph.subgraph.not_bot_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.not_bot_adj
@[simp]
theorem verts_sup (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_sup
@[simp]
theorem verts_inf (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_inf
@[simp]
theorem verts_top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).verts = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_top SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_top
@[simp]
theorem verts_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).verts = ∅ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_bot SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_bot
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.Sup_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.Inf_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sInf_adj
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.supr_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.iSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ G.Adj a b := by
simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.infi_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.iInf_adj
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set G.Subgraph} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G', hG'⟩ := hs
exact fun h => G'.adj_sub (h _ hG')
#align simple_graph.subgraph.Inf_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sInf_adj_of_nonempty
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean | 415 | 418 | theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → G.Subgraph} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by |
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _)]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
#align_import data.real.sign from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
namespace Real
noncomputable def sign (r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if r < 0 then -1 else if 0 < r then 1 else 0
#align real.sign Real.sign
theorem sign_of_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : sign r = -1 := by rw [sign, if_pos hr]
#align real.sign_of_neg Real.sign_of_neg
theorem sign_of_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : sign r = 1 := by rw [sign, if_pos hr, if_neg hr.not_lt]
#align real.sign_of_pos Real.sign_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := by rw [sign, if_neg (lt_irrefl _), if_neg (lt_irrefl _)]
#align real.sign_zero Real.sign_zero
@[simp]
theorem sign_one : sign 1 = 1 :=
sign_of_pos <| by norm_num
#align real.sign_one Real.sign_one
theorem sign_apply_eq (r : ℝ) : sign r = -1 ∨ sign r = 0 ∨ sign r = 1 := by
obtain hn | rfl | hp := lt_trichotomy r (0 : ℝ)
· exact Or.inl <| sign_of_neg hn
· exact Or.inr <| Or.inl <| sign_zero
· exact Or.inr <| Or.inr <| sign_of_pos hp
#align real.sign_apply_eq Real.sign_apply_eq
theorem sign_apply_eq_of_ne_zero (r : ℝ) (h : r ≠ 0) : sign r = -1 ∨ sign r = 1 :=
h.lt_or_lt.imp sign_of_neg sign_of_pos
#align real.sign_apply_eq_of_ne_zero Real.sign_apply_eq_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {r : ℝ} : sign r = 0 ↔ r = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ sign_zero⟩
obtain hn | rfl | hp := lt_trichotomy r (0 : ℝ)
· rw [sign_of_neg hn, neg_eq_zero] at h
exact (one_ne_zero h).elim
· rfl
· rw [sign_of_pos hp] at h
exact (one_ne_zero h).elim
#align real.sign_eq_zero_iff Real.sign_eq_zero_iff
theorem sign_intCast (z : ℤ) : sign (z : ℝ) = ↑(Int.sign z) := by
obtain hn | rfl | hp := lt_trichotomy z (0 : ℤ)
· rw [sign_of_neg (Int.cast_lt_zero.mpr hn), Int.sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg hn, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_one]
· rw [Int.cast_zero, sign_zero, Int.sign_zero, Int.cast_zero]
· rw [sign_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr hp), Int.sign_eq_one_of_pos hp, Int.cast_one]
#align real.sign_int_cast Real.sign_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias sign_int_cast := sign_intCast
theorem sign_neg {r : ℝ} : sign (-r) = -sign r := by
obtain hn | rfl | hp := lt_trichotomy r (0 : ℝ)
· rw [sign_of_neg hn, sign_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr hn), neg_neg]
· rw [sign_zero, neg_zero, sign_zero]
· rw [sign_of_pos hp, sign_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.mpr hp)]
#align real.sign_neg Real.sign_neg
theorem sign_mul_nonneg (r : ℝ) : 0 ≤ sign r * r := by
obtain hn | rfl | hp := lt_trichotomy r (0 : ℝ)
· rw [sign_of_neg hn]
exact mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (by norm_num) hn.le
· rw [mul_zero]
· rw [sign_of_pos hp, one_mul]
exact hp.le
#align real.sign_mul_nonneg Real.sign_mul_nonneg
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Sign.lean | 101 | 104 | theorem sign_mul_pos_of_ne_zero (r : ℝ) (hr : r ≠ 0) : 0 < sign r * r := by |
refine lt_of_le_of_ne (sign_mul_nonneg r) fun h => hr ?_
have hs0 := (zero_eq_mul.mp h).resolve_right hr
exact sign_eq_zero_iff.mp hs0
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_same_ray_neg Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 447 | 466 | theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by |
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
#align ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt Ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
#align ordinal.mul_div_cancel Ordinal.mul_div_cancel
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
#align ordinal.div_one Ordinal.div_one
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
#align ordinal.div_self Ordinal.div_self
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
#align ordinal.mul_sub Ordinal.mul_sub
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply sub_isLimit h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact add_isLimit a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
#align ordinal.is_limit_add_iff Ordinal.isLimit_add_iff
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_add_iff Ordinal.dvd_add_iff
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
#align ordinal.div_mul_cancel Ordinal.div_mul_cancel
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
#align ordinal.le_of_dvd Ordinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
#align ordinal.dvd_antisymm Ordinal.dvd_antisymm
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.mod_def Ordinal.mod_def
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
#align ordinal.mod_le Ordinal.mod_le
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_zero Ordinal.mod_zero
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt Ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
#align ordinal.zero_mod Ordinal.zero_mod
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
#align ordinal.div_add_mod Ordinal.div_add_mod
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
#align ordinal.mod_lt Ordinal.mod_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_self Ordinal.mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_one Ordinal.mod_one
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
#align ordinal.mul_add_mod_self Ordinal.mul_add_mod_self
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,083 | 1,084 | theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by |
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
|
import ProofWidgets.Component.HtmlDisplay
open scoped ProofWidgets.Jsx -- ⟵ remember this!
def htmlLetters : Array ProofWidgets.Html :=
#[
<span style={json% {color: "red"}}>H</span>,
<span style={json% {color: "yellow"}}>T</span>,
<span style={json% {color: "green"}}>M</span>,
<span style={json% {color: "blue"}}>L</span>
]
def x := <b>You can use {...htmlLetters} {.text " "} in lean! {.text <| toString <| 4 + 5} <hr/> </b>
-- Put your cursor over this
#html x
| .lake/packages/proofwidgets/ProofWidgets/Demos/Jsx.lean | 18 | 24 | theorem ghjk : True := by |
-- Put your cursor over any of the `html!` lines
html! <b>What, HTML in Lean?! </b>
html! <i>And another!</i>
-- attributes and text nodes can be interpolated
html! <img src={ "https://" ++ "upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/Parrot_montage.jpg"} alt="parrots" />
trivial
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : Monotone (preimage f) := fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h
#align set.monotone_preimage Set.monotone_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f ⁻¹' s i :=
Set.ext <| by simp [preimage]
#align set.preimage_Union Set.preimage_iUnion
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,719 | 1,720 | theorem preimage_iUnion₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by | simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Basic
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {f : E → E'}
{s : Set E} {x : E}
section MFDerivFderiv
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_uniqueDiffWithinAt :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) s x ↔ UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x := by
simp only [UniqueMDiffWithinAt, mfld_simps]
#align unique_mdiff_within_at_iff_unique_diff_within_at uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_uniqueDiffWithinAt
alias ⟨UniqueMDiffWithinAt.uniqueDiffWithinAt, UniqueDiffWithinAt.uniqueMDiffWithinAt⟩ :=
uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_uniqueDiffWithinAt
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.unique_diff_within_at UniqueMDiffWithinAt.uniqueDiffWithinAt
#align unique_diff_within_at.unique_mdiff_within_at UniqueDiffWithinAt.uniqueMDiffWithinAt
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_iff_uniqueDiffOn : UniqueMDiffOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) s ↔ UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s := by
simp [UniqueMDiffOn, UniqueDiffOn, uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_uniqueDiffWithinAt]
#align unique_mdiff_on_iff_unique_diff_on uniqueMDiffOn_iff_uniqueDiffOn
alias ⟨UniqueMDiffOn.uniqueDiffOn, UniqueDiffOn.uniqueMDiffOn⟩ := uniqueMDiffOn_iff_uniqueDiffOn
#align unique_mdiff_on.unique_diff_on UniqueMDiffOn.uniqueDiffOn
#align unique_diff_on.unique_mdiff_on UniqueDiffOn.uniqueMDiffOn
-- Porting note (#10618): was `@[simp, mfld_simps]` but `simp` can prove it
theorem writtenInExtChartAt_model_space : writtenInExtChartAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') x f = f :=
rfl
#align written_in_ext_chart_model_space writtenInExtChartAt_model_space
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {f'} :
HasMFDerivWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x f' ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
simpa only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, and_iff_right_iff_imp, mfld_simps] using
HasFDerivWithinAt.continuousWithinAt
#align has_mfderiv_within_at_iff_has_fderiv_within_at hasMFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
alias ⟨HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt, HasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt⟩ :=
hasMFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.has_fderiv_within_at HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align has_fderiv_within_at.has_mfderiv_within_at HasFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem hasMFDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt {f'} :
HasMFDerivAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x f' ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ, hasMFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivWithinAt_univ]
#align has_mfderiv_at_iff_has_fderiv_at hasMFDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasMFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt, HasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt⟩ := hasMFDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
#align has_mfderiv_at.has_fderiv_at HasMFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
#align has_fderiv_at.has_mfderiv_at HasFDerivAt.hasMFDerivAt
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_differentiableWithinAt :
MDifferentiableWithinAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
simp only [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff', mfld_simps]
exact ⟨fun H => H.2, fun H => ⟨H.continuousWithinAt, H⟩⟩
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_iff_differentiable_within_at mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_differentiableWithinAt
alias ⟨MDifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt,
DifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt⟩ :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_differentiableWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.differentiable_within_at MDifferentiableWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.mdifferentiable_within_at DifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_differentiableAt :
MDifferentiableAt 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
simp only [mdifferentiableAt_iff, differentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]
exact ⟨fun H => H.2, fun H => ⟨H.continuousAt, H⟩⟩
#align mdifferentiable_at_iff_differentiable_at mdifferentiableAt_iff_differentiableAt
alias ⟨MDifferentiableAt.differentiableAt, DifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt⟩ :=
mdifferentiableAt_iff_differentiableAt
#align mdifferentiable_at.differentiable_at MDifferentiableAt.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.mdifferentiable_at DifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt
theorem mdifferentiableOn_iff_differentiableOn :
MDifferentiableOn 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_differentiableWithinAt]
#align mdifferentiable_on_iff_differentiable_on mdifferentiableOn_iff_differentiableOn
alias ⟨MDifferentiableOn.differentiableOn, DifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn⟩ :=
mdifferentiableOn_iff_differentiableOn
#align mdifferentiable_on.differentiable_on MDifferentiableOn.differentiableOn
#align differentiable_on.mdifferentiable_on DifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableOn
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/FDeriv.lean | 108 | 110 | theorem mdifferentiable_iff_differentiable :
MDifferentiable 𝓘(𝕜, E) 𝓘(𝕜, E') f ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by |
simp only [MDifferentiable, Differentiable, mdifferentiableAt_iff_differentiableAt]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 230 | 233 | theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by |
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Category.FinPartOrd
import Mathlib.Order.Category.LinOrd
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.RegularMono
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import order.category.NonemptyFinLinOrd from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fa4a805d16a9cd9c96e0f8edeb57dc5a07af1a19"
universe u v
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
class NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder (α : Type*) extends Fintype α, LinearOrder α where
Nonempty : Nonempty α := by infer_instance
#align nonempty_fin_lin_ord NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder
attribute [instance] NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder.Nonempty
instance (priority := 100) NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder.toBoundedOrder (α : Type*)
[NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder α] : BoundedOrder α :=
Fintype.toBoundedOrder α
#align nonempty_fin_lin_ord.to_bounded_order NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder.toBoundedOrder
instance PUnit.nonemptyFiniteLinearOrder : NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder PUnit where
#align punit.nonempty_fin_lin_ord PUnit.nonemptyFiniteLinearOrder
instance Fin.nonemptyFiniteLinearOrder (n : ℕ) : NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder (Fin (n + 1)) where
#align fin.nonempty_fin_lin_ord Fin.nonemptyFiniteLinearOrder
instance ULift.nonemptyFiniteLinearOrder (α : Type u) [NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder α] :
NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder (ULift.{v} α) :=
{ LinearOrder.lift' Equiv.ulift (Equiv.injective _) with }
#align ulift.nonempty_fin_lin_ord ULift.nonemptyFiniteLinearOrder
instance (α : Type*) [NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder α] : NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.fintype α with }
def NonemptyFinLinOrd :=
Bundled NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd NonemptyFinLinOrd
namespace NonemptyFinLinOrd
instance : BundledHom.ParentProjection @NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder :=
⟨⟩
deriving instance LargeCategory for NonemptyFinLinOrd
-- Porting note: probably see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
instance : ConcreteCategory NonemptyFinLinOrd :=
BundledHom.concreteCategory _
instance : CoeSort NonemptyFinLinOrd Type* :=
Bundled.coeSort
def of (α : Type*) [NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder α] : NonemptyFinLinOrd :=
Bundled.of α
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.of NonemptyFinLinOrd.of
@[simp]
theorem coe_of (α : Type*) [NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder α] : ↥(of α) = α :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.coe_of NonemptyFinLinOrd.coe_of
instance : Inhabited NonemptyFinLinOrd :=
⟨of PUnit⟩
instance (α : NonemptyFinLinOrd) : NonemptyFiniteLinearOrder α :=
α.str
instance hasForgetToLinOrd : HasForget₂ NonemptyFinLinOrd LinOrd :=
BundledHom.forget₂ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.has_forget_to_LinOrd NonemptyFinLinOrd.hasForgetToLinOrd
instance hasForgetToFinPartOrd : HasForget₂ NonemptyFinLinOrd FinPartOrd where
forget₂ :=
{ obj := fun X => FinPartOrd.of X
map := @fun X Y => id }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.has_forget_to_FinPartOrd NonemptyFinLinOrd.hasForgetToFinPartOrd
@[simps]
def Iso.mk {α β : NonemptyFinLinOrd.{u}} (e : α ≃o β) : α ≅ β where
hom := (e : OrderHom _ _)
inv := (e.symm : OrderHom _ _)
hom_inv_id := by
ext x
exact e.symm_apply_apply x
inv_hom_id := by
ext x
exact e.apply_symm_apply x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.iso.mk NonemptyFinLinOrd.Iso.mk
@[simps]
def dual : NonemptyFinLinOrd ⥤ NonemptyFinLinOrd where
obj X := of Xᵒᵈ
map := OrderHom.dual
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.dual NonemptyFinLinOrd.dual
@[simps functor inverse]
def dualEquiv : NonemptyFinLinOrd ≌ NonemptyFinLinOrd where
functor := dual
inverse := dual
unitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Iso.mk <| OrderIso.dualDual X
counitIso := NatIso.ofComponents fun X => Iso.mk <| OrderIso.dualDual X
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.dual_equiv NonemptyFinLinOrd.dualEquiv
instance {A B : NonemptyFinLinOrd.{u}} : FunLike (A ⟶ B) A B where
coe f := ⇑(show OrderHom A B from f)
coe_injective' _ _ h := by
ext x
exact congr_fun h x
-- porting note (#10670): this instance was not necessary in mathlib
instance {A B : NonemptyFinLinOrd.{u}} : OrderHomClass (A ⟶ B) A B where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone h
theorem mono_iff_injective {A B : NonemptyFinLinOrd.{u}} (f : A ⟶ B) :
Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f := by
refine ⟨?_, ConcreteCategory.mono_of_injective f⟩
intro
intro a₁ a₂ h
let X := NonemptyFinLinOrd.of (ULift (Fin 1))
let g₁ : X ⟶ A := ⟨fun _ => a₁, fun _ _ _ => by rfl⟩
let g₂ : X ⟶ A := ⟨fun _ => a₂, fun _ _ _ => by rfl⟩
change g₁ (ULift.up (0 : Fin 1)) = g₂ (ULift.up (0 : Fin 1))
have eq : g₁ ≫ f = g₂ ≫ f := by
ext
exact h
rw [cancel_mono] at eq
rw [eq]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align NonemptyFinLinOrd.mono_iff_injective NonemptyFinLinOrd.mono_iff_injective
-- Porting note: added to ease the following proof
lemma forget_map_apply {A B : NonemptyFinLinOrd.{u}} (f : A ⟶ B) (a : A) :
(forget NonemptyFinLinOrd).map f a = (f : OrderHom A B).toFun a := rfl
| Mathlib/Order/Category/NonemptyFinLinOrd.lean | 171 | 209 | theorem epi_iff_surjective {A B : NonemptyFinLinOrd.{u}} (f : A ⟶ B) :
Epi f ↔ Function.Surjective f := by |
constructor
· intro
dsimp only [Function.Surjective]
by_contra! hf'
rcases hf' with ⟨m, hm⟩
let Y := NonemptyFinLinOrd.of (ULift (Fin 2))
let p₁ : B ⟶ Y :=
⟨fun b => if b < m then ULift.up 0 else ULift.up 1, fun x₁ x₂ h => by
simp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
any_goals apply Fin.zero_le
· exfalso
exact h₁ (lt_of_le_of_lt h h₂)
· rfl⟩
let p₂ : B ⟶ Y :=
⟨fun b => if b ≤ m then ULift.up 0 else ULift.up 1, fun x₁ x₂ h => by
simp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
any_goals apply Fin.zero_le
· exfalso
exact h₁ (h.trans h₂)
· rfl⟩
have h : p₁ m = p₂ m := by
congr
rw [← cancel_epi f]
ext a
simp only [coe_of, comp_apply]
change ite _ _ _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
any_goals rfl
· exfalso
exact h₂ (le_of_lt h₁)
· exfalso
exact hm a (eq_of_le_of_not_lt h₂ h₁)
simp [Y, DFunLike.coe] at h
· intro h
exact ConcreteCategory.epi_of_surjective f h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.coprime.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"509de852e1de55e1efa8eacfa11df0823f26f226"
universe u v
section IsCoprime
variable {R : Type u} {I : Type v} [CommSemiring R] {x y z : R} {s : I → R} {t : Finset I}
section
theorem Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {m n : ℤ} : IsCoprime m n ↔ Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, h⟩
have : 1 = m * a + n * b := by rwa [mul_comm m, mul_comm n, eq_comm]
exact Nat.dvd_one.mp (Int.gcd_dvd_iff.mpr ⟨a, b, this⟩)
· rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, IsCoprime, Int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, mul_comm m, mul_comm n, Nat.cast_one]
intro h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Lemmas.lean | 42 | 43 | theorem Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime {m n : ℕ} : IsCoprime (m : ℤ) n ↔ Nat.Coprime m n := by |
rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Int.gcd_natCast_natCast]
|
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
open Set Function
open Pointwise
abbrev Ideal (R : Type u) [Semiring R] :=
Submodule R R
#align ideal Ideal
@[mk_iff]
class IsPrincipalIdealRing (R : Type u) [Semiring R] : Prop where
principal : ∀ S : Ideal R, S.IsPrincipal
#align is_principal_ideal_ring IsPrincipalIdealRing
attribute [instance] IsPrincipalIdealRing.principal
section Semiring
namespace Ideal
variable [Semiring α] (I : Ideal α) {a b : α}
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : α) ∈ I :=
Submodule.zero_mem I
#align ideal.zero_mem Ideal.zero_mem
protected theorem add_mem : a ∈ I → b ∈ I → a + b ∈ I :=
Submodule.add_mem I
#align ideal.add_mem Ideal.add_mem
variable (a)
theorem mul_mem_left : b ∈ I → a * b ∈ I :=
Submodule.smul_mem I a
#align ideal.mul_mem_left Ideal.mul_mem_left
variable {a}
@[ext]
theorem ext {I J : Ideal α} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
Submodule.ext h
#align ideal.ext Ideal.ext
theorem sum_mem (I : Ideal α) {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} :
(∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ I) → (∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ I :=
Submodule.sum_mem I
#align ideal.sum_mem Ideal.sum_mem
theorem eq_top_of_unit_mem (x y : α) (hx : x ∈ I) (h : y * x = 1) : I = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun z _ =>
calc
z = z * (y * x) := by simp [h]
_ = z * y * x := Eq.symm <| mul_assoc z y x
_ ∈ I := I.mul_mem_left _ hx
#align ideal.eq_top_of_unit_mem Ideal.eq_top_of_unit_mem
theorem eq_top_of_isUnit_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ I) (h : IsUnit x) : I = ⊤ :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := h.exists_left_inv
eq_top_of_unit_mem I x y hx hy
#align ideal.eq_top_of_is_unit_mem Ideal.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem
theorem eq_top_iff_one : I = ⊤ ↔ (1 : α) ∈ I :=
⟨by rintro rfl; trivial, fun h => eq_top_of_unit_mem _ _ 1 h (by simp)⟩
#align ideal.eq_top_iff_one Ideal.eq_top_iff_one
theorem ne_top_iff_one : I ≠ ⊤ ↔ (1 : α) ∉ I :=
not_congr I.eq_top_iff_one
#align ideal.ne_top_iff_one Ideal.ne_top_iff_one
@[simp]
theorem unit_mul_mem_iff_mem {x y : α} (hy : IsUnit y) : y * x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ I := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => I.mul_mem_left y h⟩
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hy.exists_left_inv
have := I.mul_mem_left y' h
rwa [← mul_assoc, hy', one_mul] at this
#align ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem
def span (s : Set α) : Ideal α :=
Submodule.span α s
#align ideal.span Ideal.span
@[simp]
theorem submodule_span_eq {s : Set α} : Submodule.span α s = Ideal.span s :=
rfl
#align ideal.submodule_span_eq Ideal.submodule_span_eq
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : span (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
Submodule.span_empty
#align ideal.span_empty Ideal.span_empty
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : span (Set.univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
Submodule.span_univ
#align ideal.span_univ Ideal.span_univ
theorem span_union (s t : Set α) : span (s ∪ t) = span s ⊔ span t :=
Submodule.span_union _ _
#align ideal.span_union Ideal.span_union
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set α) : span (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, span (s i) :=
Submodule.span_iUnion _
#align ideal.span_Union Ideal.span_iUnion
theorem mem_span {s : Set α} (x) : x ∈ span s ↔ ∀ p : Ideal α, s ⊆ p → x ∈ p :=
mem_iInter₂
#align ideal.mem_span Ideal.mem_span
theorem subset_span {s : Set α} : s ⊆ span s :=
Submodule.subset_span
#align ideal.subset_span Ideal.subset_span
theorem span_le {s : Set α} {I} : span s ≤ I ↔ s ⊆ I :=
Submodule.span_le
#align ideal.span_le Ideal.span_le
theorem span_mono {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → span s ≤ span t :=
Submodule.span_mono
#align ideal.span_mono Ideal.span_mono
@[simp]
theorem span_eq : span (I : Set α) = I :=
Submodule.span_eq _
#align ideal.span_eq Ideal.span_eq
@[simp]
theorem span_singleton_one : span ({1} : Set α) = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| subset_span <| mem_singleton _
#align ideal.span_singleton_one Ideal.span_singleton_one
theorem isCompactElement_top : CompleteLattice.IsCompactElement (⊤ : Ideal α) := by
simpa only [← span_singleton_one] using Submodule.singleton_span_isCompactElement 1
theorem mem_span_insert {s : Set α} {x y} :
x ∈ span (insert y s) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ z ∈ span s, x = a * y + z :=
Submodule.mem_span_insert
#align ideal.mem_span_insert Ideal.mem_span_insert
theorem mem_span_singleton' {x y : α} : x ∈ span ({y} : Set α) ↔ ∃ a, a * y = x :=
Submodule.mem_span_singleton
#align ideal.mem_span_singleton' Ideal.mem_span_singleton'
theorem span_singleton_le_iff_mem {x : α} : span {x} ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I :=
Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem _ _
#align ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem
theorem span_singleton_mul_left_unit {a : α} (h2 : IsUnit a) (x : α) :
span ({a * x} : Set α) = span {x} := by
apply le_antisymm <;> rw [span_singleton_le_iff_mem, mem_span_singleton']
exacts [⟨a, rfl⟩, ⟨_, h2.unit.inv_mul_cancel_left x⟩]
#align ideal.span_singleton_mul_left_unit Ideal.span_singleton_mul_left_unit
theorem span_insert (x) (s : Set α) : span (insert x s) = span ({x} : Set α) ⊔ span s :=
Submodule.span_insert x s
#align ideal.span_insert Ideal.span_insert
theorem span_eq_bot {s : Set α} : span s = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, (x : α) = 0 :=
Submodule.span_eq_bot
#align ideal.span_eq_bot Ideal.span_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem span_singleton_eq_bot {x} : span ({x} : Set α) = ⊥ ↔ x = 0 :=
Submodule.span_singleton_eq_bot
#align ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot
theorem span_singleton_ne_top {α : Type*} [CommSemiring α] {x : α} (hx : ¬IsUnit x) :
Ideal.span ({x} : Set α) ≠ ⊤ :=
(Ideal.ne_top_iff_one _).mpr fun h1 =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mp h1
hx ⟨⟨x, y, mul_comm y x ▸ hy, hy⟩, rfl⟩
#align ideal.span_singleton_ne_top Ideal.span_singleton_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem span_zero : span (0 : Set α) = ⊥ := by rw [← Set.singleton_zero, span_singleton_eq_bot]
#align ideal.span_zero Ideal.span_zero
@[simp]
theorem span_one : span (1 : Set α) = ⊤ := by rw [← Set.singleton_one, span_singleton_one]
#align ideal.span_one Ideal.span_one
theorem span_eq_top_iff_finite (s : Set α) :
span s = ⊤ ↔ ∃ s' : Finset α, ↑s' ⊆ s ∧ span (s' : Set α) = ⊤ := by
simp_rw [eq_top_iff_one]
exact ⟨Submodule.mem_span_finite_of_mem_span, fun ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ => span_mono h₁ h₂⟩
#align ideal.span_eq_top_iff_finite Ideal.span_eq_top_iff_finite
theorem mem_span_singleton_sup {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] {x y : S} {I : Ideal S} :
x ∈ Ideal.span {y} ⊔ I ↔ ∃ a : S, ∃ b ∈ I, a * y + b = x := by
rw [Submodule.mem_sup]
constructor
· rintro ⟨ya, hya, b, hb, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.mp hya
exact ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a * y, Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨a, rfl⟩, b, hb, rfl⟩
#align ideal.mem_span_singleton_sup Ideal.mem_span_singleton_sup
def ofRel (r : α → α → Prop) : Ideal α :=
Submodule.span α { x | ∃ a b, r a b ∧ x + b = a }
#align ideal.of_rel Ideal.ofRel
class IsPrime (I : Ideal α) : Prop where
ne_top' : I ≠ ⊤
mem_or_mem' : ∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I
#align ideal.is_prime Ideal.IsPrime
theorem isPrime_iff {I : Ideal α} : IsPrime I ↔ I ≠ ⊤ ∧ ∀ {x y : α}, x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2⟩⟩
#align ideal.is_prime_iff Ideal.isPrime_iff
theorem IsPrime.ne_top {I : Ideal α} (hI : I.IsPrime) : I ≠ ⊤ :=
hI.1
#align ideal.is_prime.ne_top Ideal.IsPrime.ne_top
theorem IsPrime.mem_or_mem {I : Ideal α} (hI : I.IsPrime) {x y : α} : x * y ∈ I → x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I :=
hI.2
#align ideal.is_prime.mem_or_mem Ideal.IsPrime.mem_or_mem
theorem IsPrime.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero {I : Ideal α} (hI : I.IsPrime) {x y : α} (h : x * y = 0) :
x ∈ I ∨ y ∈ I :=
hI.mem_or_mem (h.symm ▸ I.zero_mem)
#align ideal.is_prime.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero Ideal.IsPrime.mem_or_mem_of_mul_eq_zero
theorem IsPrime.mem_of_pow_mem {I : Ideal α} (hI : I.IsPrime) {r : α} (n : ℕ) (H : r ^ n ∈ I) :
r ∈ I := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [pow_zero] at H
exact (mt (eq_top_iff_one _).2 hI.1).elim H
· rw [pow_succ] at H
exact Or.casesOn (hI.mem_or_mem H) ih id
#align ideal.is_prime.mem_of_pow_mem Ideal.IsPrime.mem_of_pow_mem
theorem not_isPrime_iff {I : Ideal α} :
¬I.IsPrime ↔ I = ⊤ ∨ ∃ (x : α) (_hx : x ∉ I) (y : α) (_hy : y ∉ I), x * y ∈ I := by
simp_rw [Ideal.isPrime_iff, not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not, not_forall, not_or]
exact
or_congr Iff.rfl
⟨fun ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ => ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩, fun ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ =>
⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩⟩
#align ideal.not_is_prime_iff Ideal.not_isPrime_iff
theorem zero_ne_one_of_proper {I : Ideal α} (h : I ≠ ⊤) : (0 : α) ≠ 1 := fun hz =>
I.ne_top_iff_one.1 h <| hz ▸ I.zero_mem
#align ideal.zero_ne_one_of_proper Ideal.zero_ne_one_of_proper
theorem bot_prime [IsDomain α] : (⊥ : Ideal α).IsPrime :=
⟨fun h => one_ne_zero (by rwa [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_bot] at h), fun h =>
mul_eq_zero.mp (by simpa only [Submodule.mem_bot] using h)⟩
#align ideal.bot_prime Ideal.bot_prime
class IsMaximal (I : Ideal α) : Prop where
out : IsCoatom I
#align ideal.is_maximal Ideal.IsMaximal
theorem isMaximal_def {I : Ideal α} : I.IsMaximal ↔ IsCoatom I :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align ideal.is_maximal_def Ideal.isMaximal_def
theorem IsMaximal.ne_top {I : Ideal α} (h : I.IsMaximal) : I ≠ ⊤ :=
(isMaximal_def.1 h).1
#align ideal.is_maximal.ne_top Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top
theorem isMaximal_iff {I : Ideal α} :
I.IsMaximal ↔ (1 : α) ∉ I ∧ ∀ (J : Ideal α) (x), I ≤ J → x ∉ I → x ∈ J → (1 : α) ∈ J :=
isMaximal_def.trans <|
and_congr I.ne_top_iff_one <|
forall_congr' fun J => by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le];
exact
⟨fun H x h hx₁ hx₂ => J.eq_top_iff_one.1 <| H ⟨h, not_subset.2 ⟨_, hx₂, hx₁⟩⟩,
fun H ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
let ⟨x, xJ, xI⟩ := not_subset.1 h₂
J.eq_top_iff_one.2 <| H x h₁ xI xJ⟩
#align ideal.is_maximal_iff Ideal.isMaximal_iff
theorem IsMaximal.eq_of_le {I J : Ideal α} (hI : I.IsMaximal) (hJ : J ≠ ⊤) (IJ : I ≤ J) : I = J :=
eq_iff_le_not_lt.2 ⟨IJ, fun h => hJ (hI.1.2 _ h)⟩
#align ideal.is_maximal.eq_of_le Ideal.IsMaximal.eq_of_le
instance : IsCoatomic (Ideal α) := by
apply CompleteLattice.coatomic_of_top_compact
rw [← span_singleton_one]
exact Submodule.singleton_span_isCompactElement 1
theorem IsMaximal.coprime_of_ne {M M' : Ideal α} (hM : M.IsMaximal) (hM' : M'.IsMaximal)
(hne : M ≠ M') : M ⊔ M' = ⊤ := by
contrapose! hne with h
exact hM.eq_of_le hM'.ne_top (le_sup_left.trans_eq (hM'.eq_of_le h le_sup_right).symm)
#align ideal.is_maximal.coprime_of_ne Ideal.IsMaximal.coprime_of_ne
theorem exists_le_maximal (I : Ideal α) (hI : I ≠ ⊤) : ∃ M : Ideal α, M.IsMaximal ∧ I ≤ M :=
let ⟨m, hm⟩ := (eq_top_or_exists_le_coatom I).resolve_left hI
⟨m, ⟨⟨hm.1⟩, hm.2⟩⟩
#align ideal.exists_le_maximal Ideal.exists_le_maximal
variable (α)
theorem exists_maximal [Nontrivial α] : ∃ M : Ideal α, M.IsMaximal :=
let ⟨I, ⟨hI, _⟩⟩ := exists_le_maximal (⊥ : Ideal α) bot_ne_top
⟨I, hI⟩
#align ideal.exists_maximal Ideal.exists_maximal
variable {α}
instance [Nontrivial α] : Nontrivial (Ideal α) := by
rcases@exists_maximal α _ _ with ⟨M, hM, _⟩
exact nontrivial_of_ne M ⊤ hM
theorem maximal_of_no_maximal {P : Ideal α}
(hmax : ∀ m : Ideal α, P < m → ¬IsMaximal m) (J : Ideal α) (hPJ : P < J) : J = ⊤ := by
by_contra hnonmax
rcases exists_le_maximal J hnonmax with ⟨M, hM1, hM2⟩
exact hmax M (lt_of_lt_of_le hPJ hM2) hM1
#align ideal.maximal_of_no_maximal Ideal.maximal_of_no_maximal
theorem span_pair_comm {x y : α} : (span {x, y} : Ideal α) = span {y, x} := by
simp only [span_insert, sup_comm]
#align ideal.span_pair_comm Ideal.span_pair_comm
theorem mem_span_pair {x y z : α} : z ∈ span ({x, y} : Set α) ↔ ∃ a b, a * x + b * y = z :=
Submodule.mem_span_pair
#align ideal.mem_span_pair Ideal.mem_span_pair
@[simp]
theorem span_pair_add_mul_left {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {x y : R} (z : R) :
(span {x + y * z, y} : Ideal R) = span {x, y} := by
ext
rw [mem_span_pair, mem_span_pair]
exact
⟨fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ =>
⟨a, b + a * z, by
rw [← h]
ring1⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ =>
⟨a, b - a * z, by
rw [← h]
ring1⟩⟩
#align ideal.span_pair_add_mul_left Ideal.span_pair_add_mul_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Basic.lean | 390 | 392 | theorem span_pair_add_mul_right {R : Type u} [CommRing R] {x y : R} (z : R) :
(span {x, y + x * z} : Ideal R) = span {x, y} := by |
rw [span_pair_comm, span_pair_add_mul_left, span_pair_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
#align_import data.multiset.fintype from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3d9ab8faa9dea8f78155c6c27d62a621f4c152d"
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {m : Multiset α}
def Multiset.ToType (m : Multiset α) : Type _ := (x : α) × Fin (m.count x)
#align multiset.to_type Multiset.ToType
instance : CoeSort (Multiset α) (Type _) := ⟨Multiset.ToType⟩
example : DecidableEq m := inferInstanceAs <| DecidableEq ((x : α) × Fin (m.count x))
-- Porting note: syntactic equality
#noalign multiset.coe_sort_eq
@[reducible, match_pattern]
def Multiset.mkToType (m : Multiset α) (x : α) (i : Fin (m.count x)) : m :=
⟨x, i⟩
#align multiset.mk_to_type Multiset.mkToType
instance instCoeSortMultisetType.instCoeOutToType : CoeOut m α :=
⟨fun x ↦ x.1⟩
#align multiset.has_coe_to_sort.has_coe instCoeSortMultisetType.instCoeOutToTypeₓ
-- Porting note: syntactic equality
#noalign multiset.fst_coe_eq_coe
-- Syntactic equality
#noalign multiset.coe_eq
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem Multiset.coe_mk {x : α} {i : Fin (m.count x)} : ↑(m.mkToType x i) = x :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_mk Multiset.coe_mk
@[simp] lemma Multiset.coe_mem {x : m} : ↑x ∈ m := Multiset.count_pos.mp (by have := x.2.2; omega)
#align multiset.coe_mem Multiset.coe_mem
@[simp]
protected theorem Multiset.forall_coe (p : m → Prop) :
(∀ x : m, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (i : Fin (m.count x)), p ⟨x, i⟩ :=
Sigma.forall
#align multiset.forall_coe Multiset.forall_coe
@[simp]
protected theorem Multiset.exists_coe (p : m → Prop) :
(∃ x : m, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (i : Fin (m.count x)), p ⟨x, i⟩ :=
Sigma.exists
#align multiset.exists_coe Multiset.exists_coe
instance : Fintype { p : α × ℕ | p.2 < m.count p.1 } :=
Fintype.ofFinset
(m.toFinset.biUnion fun x ↦ (Finset.range (m.count x)).map ⟨Prod.mk x, Prod.mk.inj_left x⟩)
(by
rintro ⟨x, i⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_range,
Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Prod.mk.inj_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
simp only [← and_assoc, exists_eq_right, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun h ↦ Multiset.count_pos.mp (by omega))
def Multiset.toEnumFinset (m : Multiset α) : Finset (α × ℕ) :=
{ p : α × ℕ | p.2 < m.count p.1 }.toFinset
#align multiset.to_enum_finset Multiset.toEnumFinset
@[simp]
theorem Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset (m : Multiset α) (p : α × ℕ) :
p ∈ m.toEnumFinset ↔ p.2 < m.count p.1 :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align multiset.mem_to_enum_finset Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset
theorem Multiset.mem_of_mem_toEnumFinset {p : α × ℕ} (h : p ∈ m.toEnumFinset) : p.1 ∈ m :=
have := (m.mem_toEnumFinset p).mp h; Multiset.count_pos.mp (by omega)
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_to_enum_finset Multiset.mem_of_mem_toEnumFinset
@[mono]
theorem Multiset.toEnumFinset_mono {m₁ m₂ : Multiset α} (h : m₁ ≤ m₂) :
m₁.toEnumFinset ⊆ m₂.toEnumFinset := by
intro p
simp only [Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact gt_of_ge_of_gt (Multiset.le_iff_count.mp h p.1)
#align multiset.to_enum_finset_mono Multiset.toEnumFinset_mono
@[simp]
theorem Multiset.toEnumFinset_subset_iff {m₁ m₂ : Multiset α} :
m₁.toEnumFinset ⊆ m₂.toEnumFinset ↔ m₁ ≤ m₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Multiset.toEnumFinset_mono⟩
rw [Multiset.le_iff_count]
intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ m₁
· apply Nat.le_of_pred_lt
have : (x, m₁.count x - 1) ∈ m₁.toEnumFinset := by
rw [Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt (Multiset.count_pos.mpr hx))
simpa only [Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset] using h this
· simp [hx]
#align multiset.to_enum_finset_subset_iff Multiset.toEnumFinset_subset_iff
@[simps]
def Multiset.coeEmbedding (m : Multiset α) : m ↪ α × ℕ where
toFun x := (x, x.2)
inj' := by
intro ⟨x, i, hi⟩ ⟨y, j, hj⟩
rintro ⟨⟩
rfl
#align multiset.coe_embedding Multiset.coeEmbedding
@[simps]
def Multiset.coeEquiv (m : Multiset α) : m ≃ m.toEnumFinset where
toFun x :=
⟨m.coeEmbedding x, by
rw [Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact x.2.2⟩
invFun x :=
⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, by
rw [← Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset]
exact x.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, i, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, i⟩, h⟩
rfl
#align multiset.coe_equiv Multiset.coeEquiv
@[simp]
theorem Multiset.toEmbedding_coeEquiv_trans (m : Multiset α) :
m.coeEquiv.toEmbedding.trans (Function.Embedding.subtype _) = m.coeEmbedding := by ext <;> rfl
#align multiset.to_embedding_coe_equiv_trans Multiset.toEmbedding_coeEquiv_trans
@[irreducible]
instance Multiset.fintypeCoe : Fintype m :=
Fintype.ofEquiv m.toEnumFinset m.coeEquiv.symm
#align multiset.fintype_coe Multiset.fintypeCoe
theorem Multiset.map_univ_coeEmbedding (m : Multiset α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset m).map m.coeEmbedding = m.toEnumFinset := by
ext ⟨x, i⟩
simp only [Fin.exists_iff, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_univ, Multiset.coeEmbedding_apply,
Prod.mk.inj_iff, exists_true_left, Multiset.exists_coe, Multiset.coe_mk, Fin.val_mk,
exists_prop, exists_eq_right_right, exists_eq_right, Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset, iff_self_iff,
true_and_iff]
#align multiset.map_univ_coe_embedding Multiset.map_univ_coeEmbedding
theorem Multiset.toEnumFinset_filter_eq (m : Multiset α) (x : α) :
(m.toEnumFinset.filter fun p ↦ x = p.1) =
(Finset.range (m.count x)).map ⟨Prod.mk x, Prod.mk.inj_left x⟩ := by
ext ⟨y, i⟩
simp only [eq_comm, Finset.mem_filter, Multiset.mem_toEnumFinset, Finset.mem_map,
Finset.mem_range, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Prod.mk.inj_iff, exists_prop,
exists_eq_right_right', and_congr_left_iff]
rintro rfl
rfl
#align multiset.to_enum_finset_filter_eq Multiset.toEnumFinset_filter_eq
@[simp]
theorem Multiset.map_toEnumFinset_fst (m : Multiset α) : m.toEnumFinset.val.map Prod.fst = m := by
ext x
simp only [Multiset.count_map, ← Finset.filter_val, Multiset.toEnumFinset_filter_eq,
Finset.map_val, Finset.range_val, Multiset.card_map, Multiset.card_range]
#align multiset.map_to_enum_finset_fst Multiset.map_toEnumFinset_fst
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Fintype.lean | 213 | 215 | theorem Multiset.image_toEnumFinset_fst (m : Multiset α) :
m.toEnumFinset.image Prod.fst = m.toFinset := by |
rw [Finset.image, Multiset.map_toEnumFinset_fst]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.prod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00abe0695d8767201e6d008afa22393978bb324d"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open TopologicalSpace hiding generateFrom
open Filter hiding prod_eq map
variable {α α' β β' γ E : Type*}
theorem IsPiSystem.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsPiSystem C)
(hD : IsPiSystem D) : IsPiSystem (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [prod_inter_prod] at hst ⊢; rw [prod_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hC _ hs₁ _ hs₂ hst.1) (hD _ ht₁ _ ht₂ hst.2)
#align is_pi_system.prod IsPiSystem.prod
theorem IsCountablySpanning.prod {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) : IsCountablySpanning (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by
rcases hC, hD with ⟨⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩, t, h1t, h2t⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n.unpair.1 ×ˢ t n.unpair.2, fun n => mem_image2_of_mem (h1s _) (h1t _), ?_⟩
rw [iUnion_unpair_prod, h2s, h2t, univ_prod_univ]
#align is_countably_spanning.prod IsCountablySpanning.prod
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α'] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β']
variable [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ' : Measure α} {ν ν' : Measure β} {τ : Measure γ}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Prod/Basic.lean | 102 | 127 | theorem generateFrom_prod_eq {α β} {C : Set (Set α)} {D : Set (Set β)} (hC : IsCountablySpanning C)
(hD : IsCountablySpanning D) :
@Prod.instMeasurableSpace _ _ (generateFrom C) (generateFrom D) =
generateFrom (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) C D) := by |
apply le_antisymm
· refine sup_le ?_ ?_ <;> rw [comap_generateFrom] <;> apply generateFrom_le <;>
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
· rcases hD with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← prod_univ, ← h2t, prod_iUnion]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
intro n
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
exact ⟨s, hs, t n, h1t n, rfl⟩
· rcases hC with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← univ_prod, ← h2t, iUnion_prod_const]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
rintro n
apply measurableSet_generateFrom
exact mem_image2_of_mem (h1t n) hs
· apply generateFrom_le
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
dsimp only
rw [prod_eq]
apply (measurable_fst _).inter (measurable_snd _)
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom hs
· exact measurableSet_generateFrom ht
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Ineq
#align_import group_theory.perm.sign from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
universe u v
open Equiv Function Fintype Finset
variable {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {β : Type v}
namespace Equiv.Perm
def modSwap (i j : α) : Setoid (Perm α) :=
⟨fun σ τ => σ = τ ∨ σ = swap i j * τ, fun σ => Or.inl (refl σ), fun {σ τ} h =>
Or.casesOn h (fun h => Or.inl h.symm) fun h => Or.inr (by rw [h, swap_mul_self_mul]),
fun {σ τ υ} hστ hτυ => by
cases' hστ with hστ hστ <;> cases' hτυ with hτυ hτυ <;> try rw [hστ, hτυ, swap_mul_self_mul] <;>
simp [hστ, hτυ] -- Porting note: should close goals, but doesn't
· simp [hστ, hτυ]
· simp [hστ, hτυ]
· simp [hστ, hτυ]⟩
#align equiv.perm.mod_swap Equiv.Perm.modSwap
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (i j : α) :
DecidableRel (modSwap i j).r :=
fun _ _ => Or.decidable
def swapFactorsAux :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α),
(∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) → { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g }
| [] => fun f h =>
⟨[],
Equiv.ext fun x => by
rw [List.prod_nil]
exact (Classical.not_not.1 (mt h (List.not_mem_nil _))).symm,
by simp⟩
| x::l => fun f h =>
if hfx : x = f x then
swapFactorsAux l f fun {y} hy =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h hy)
else
let m :=
swapFactorsAux l (swap x (f x) * f) fun {y} hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h this.1)
⟨swap x (f x)::m.1, by
rw [List.prod_cons, m.2.1, ← mul_assoc, mul_def (swap x (f x)), swap_swap, ← one_def,
one_mul],
fun {g} hg => ((List.mem_cons).1 hg).elim (fun h => ⟨x, f x, hfx, h⟩) (m.2.2 _)⟩
#align equiv.perm.swap_factors_aux Equiv.Perm.swapFactorsAux
def swapFactors [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] (f : Perm α) :
{ l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
swapFactorsAux ((@univ α _).sort (· ≤ ·)) f fun {_ _} => (mem_sort _).2 (mem_univ _)
#align equiv.perm.swap_factors Equiv.Perm.swapFactors
def truncSwapFactors [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
Trunc { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (@univ α _).1 (fun l h => Trunc.mk (swapFactorsAux l f (h _)))
(show ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ (@univ α _).1 from fun _ _ => mem_univ _)
#align equiv.perm.trunc_swap_factors Equiv.Perm.truncSwapFactors
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on [Finite α] {P : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (swap x y * f)) → P f := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
cases' (truncSwapFactors f).out with l hl
induction' l with g l ih generalizing f
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [hl.left.symm, List.prod_nil, forall_true_iff]
· intro h1 hmul_swap
rcases hl.2 g (by simp) with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [← hl.1, List.prod_cons, hxy.2]
exact
hmul_swap _ _ _ hxy.1
(ih _ ⟨rfl, fun v hv => hl.2 _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hv)⟩ h1 hmul_swap)
#align equiv.perm.swap_induction_on Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on
theorem closure_isSwap [Finite α] : Subgroup.closure { σ : Perm α | IsSwap σ } = ⊤ := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
refine eq_top_iff.mpr fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := Subtype.mem (truncSwapFactors x).out
rw [← h1]
exact Subgroup.list_prod_mem _ fun y hy => Subgroup.subset_closure (h2 y hy)
#align equiv.perm.closure_is_swap Equiv.Perm.closure_isSwap
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on' [Finite α] {P : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (f * swap x y)) → P f := fun h1 IH =>
inv_inv f ▸ swap_induction_on f⁻¹ h1 fun f => IH f⁻¹
#align equiv.perm.swap_induction_on' Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on'
theorem isConj_swap {w x y z : α} (hwx : w ≠ x) (hyz : y ≠ z) : IsConj (swap w x) (swap y z) :=
isConj_iff.2
(have h :
∀ {y z : α},
y ≠ z → w ≠ z → swap w y * swap x z * swap w x * (swap w y * swap x z)⁻¹ = swap y z :=
fun {y z} hyz hwz => by
rw [mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, swap_inv, mul_assoc (swap w y), mul_assoc (swap w y), ←
mul_assoc _ (swap x z), swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwx hwz, ← mul_assoc,
swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwz.symm hyz.symm]
if hwz : w = z then
have hwy : w ≠ y := by rw [hwz]; exact hyz.symm
⟨swap w z * swap x y, by rw [swap_comm y z, h hyz.symm hwy]⟩
else ⟨swap w y * swap x z, h hyz hwz⟩)
#align equiv.perm.is_conj_swap Equiv.Perm.isConj_swap
def finPairsLT (n : ℕ) : Finset (Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) :=
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).sigma fun a => (range a).attachFin fun _ hm => (mem_range.1 hm).trans a.2
#align equiv.perm.fin_pairs_lt Equiv.Perm.finPairsLT
theorem mem_finPairsLT {n : ℕ} {a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n} : a ∈ finPairsLT n ↔ a.2 < a.1 := by
simp only [finPairsLT, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, true_and_iff, mem_attachFin, mem_range, mem_univ,
mem_sigma]
#align equiv.perm.mem_fin_pairs_lt Equiv.Perm.mem_finPairsLT
def signAux {n : ℕ} (a : Perm (Fin n)) : ℤˣ :=
∏ x ∈ finPairsLT n, if a x.1 ≤ a x.2 then -1 else 1
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux Equiv.Perm.signAux
@[simp]
theorem signAux_one (n : ℕ) : signAux (1 : Perm (Fin n)) = 1 := by
unfold signAux
conv => rhs; rw [← @Finset.prod_const_one _ _ (finPairsLT n)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun a ha => if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).not_le
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_one Equiv.Perm.signAux_one
def signBijAux {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) (a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n :=
if _ : f a.2 < f a.1 then ⟨f a.1, f a.2⟩ else ⟨f a.2, f a.1⟩
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux Equiv.Perm.signBijAux
theorem signBijAux_injOn {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
(finPairsLT n : Set (Σ _, Fin n)).InjOn (signBijAux f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ hb h
dsimp [signBijAux] at h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, mem_finPairsLT] at *
have : ¬b₁ < b₂ := hb.le.not_lt
split_ifs at h <;>
simp_all [(Equiv.injective f).eq_iff, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, heq_iff_eq]
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_inj Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_injOn
theorem signBijAux_surj {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a ∈ finPairsLT n, ∃ b ∈ finPairsLT n, signBijAux f b = a :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha =>
if hxa : f⁻¹ a₂ < f⁻¹ a₁ then
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₁, f⁻¹ a₂⟩, mem_finPairsLT.2 hxa, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha)]⟩
else
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₂, f⁻¹ a₁⟩,
mem_finPairsLT.2 <|
(le_of_not_gt hxa).lt_of_ne fun h => by
simp [mem_finPairsLT, f⁻¹.injective h, lt_irrefl] at ha, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).le.not_lt]⟩
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_surj Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_surj
theorem signBijAux_mem {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n, a ∈ finPairsLT n → signBijAux f a ∈ finPairsLT n :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha => by
unfold signBijAux
split_ifs with h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2 h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2
((le_of_not_gt h).lt_of_ne fun h => (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).ne (f.injective h.symm))
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_mem Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_mem
@[simp]
theorem signAux_inv {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux f⁻¹ = signAux f :=
prod_nbij (signBijAux f⁻¹) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj fun ⟨a, b⟩ hab ↦
if h : f⁻¹ b < f⁻¹ a then by
simp_all [signBijAux, dif_pos h, if_neg h.not_le, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).not_le]
else by
simp_all [signBijAux, if_pos (le_of_not_gt h), dif_neg h, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).le]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_inv Equiv.Perm.signAux_inv
theorem signAux_mul {n : ℕ} (f g : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux (f * g) = signAux f * signAux g := by
rw [← signAux_inv g]
unfold signAux
rw [← prod_mul_distrib]
refine prod_nbij (signBijAux g) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj ?_
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ hab
dsimp only [signBijAux]
rw [mul_apply, mul_apply]
rw [mem_finPairsLT] at hab
by_cases h : g b < g a
· rw [dif_pos h]
simp only [not_le_of_gt hab, mul_one, mul_ite, mul_neg, Perm.inv_apply_self, if_false]
· rw [dif_neg h, inv_apply_self, inv_apply_self, if_pos hab.le]
by_cases h₁ : f (g b) ≤ f (g a)
· have : f (g b) ≠ f (g a) := by
rw [Ne, f.injective.eq_iff, g.injective.eq_iff]
exact ne_of_lt hab
rw [if_pos h₁, if_neg (h₁.lt_of_ne this).not_le]
rfl
· rw [if_neg h₁, if_pos (lt_of_not_ge h₁).le]
rfl
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_mul Equiv.Perm.signAux_mul
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one' (n : ℕ) : signAux (swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1) = -1 :=
show _ = ∏ x ∈ {(⟨1, 0⟩ : Σ a : Fin (n + 2), Fin (n + 2))},
if (Equiv.swap 0 1) x.1 ≤ swap 0 1 x.2 then (-1 : ℤˣ) else 1 by
refine Eq.symm (prod_subset (fun ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [mem_finPairsLT, Fin.one_pos]) fun a ha₁ ha₂ => ?_)
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩
replace ha₁ : a₂ < a₁ := mem_finPairsLT.1 ha₁
dsimp only
rcases a₁.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· exact absurd a₂.zero_le ha₁.not_le
rcases a₂.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H')
· simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, mem_singleton, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at ha₂
have : 1 < a₁ := lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.succ_le_of_lt ha₁)
(Ne.symm (by intro h; apply ha₂; simp [h]))
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 0 = 1 := by simp
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) ha₂, h01, if_neg this.not_le]
· have le : 1 ≤ a₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt H'
have lt : 1 < a₁ := le.trans_lt ha₁
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 1 = 0 := by simp only [swap_apply_right]
rcases le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | lt')
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne H.ne' lt.ne', h01, if_neg H.not_le]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) (ne_of_gt lt),
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H') (ne_of_gt lt'), if_neg ha₁.not_le]
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
signAux (swap (⟨0, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩ : Fin n) ⟨1, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩) =
-1 := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· norm_num at hn
· norm_num at hn
· exact signAux_swap_zero_one' n
theorem signAux_swap : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x y : Fin n} (_hxy : x ≠ y), signAux (swap x y) = -1
| 0, x, y => by intro; exact Fin.elim0 x
| 1, x, y => by
dsimp [signAux, swap, swapCore]
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, not_true, ite_true, le_refl, prod_const,
IsEmpty.forall_iff]
| n + 2, x, y => fun hxy => by
have h2n : 2 ≤ n + 2 := by exact le_add_self
rw [← isConj_iff_eq, ← signAux_swap_zero_one h2n]
exact (MonoidHom.mk' signAux signAux_mul).map_isConj
(isConj_swap hxy (by exact of_decide_eq_true rfl))
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_swap Equiv.Perm.signAux_swap
def signAux2 : List α → Perm α → ℤˣ
| [], _ => 1
| x::l, f => if x = f x then signAux2 l f else -signAux2 l (swap x (f x) * f)
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux2 Equiv.Perm.signAux2
theorem signAux_eq_signAux2 {n : ℕ} :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α) (e : α ≃ Fin n) (_h : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l),
signAux ((e.symm.trans f).trans e) = signAux2 l f
| [], f, e, h => by
have : f = 1 := Equiv.ext fun y => Classical.not_not.1 (mt (h y) (List.not_mem_nil _))
rw [this, one_def, Equiv.trans_refl, Equiv.symm_trans_self, ← one_def, signAux_one, signAux2]
| x::l, f, e, h => by
rw [signAux2]
by_cases hfx : x = f x
· rw [if_pos hfx]
exact
signAux_eq_signAux2 l f _ fun y (hy : f y ≠ y) =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h y hy)
· have hy : ∀ y : α, (swap x (f x) * f) y ≠ y → y ∈ l := fun y hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h _ this.1)
have : (e.symm.trans (swap x (f x) * f)).trans e =
swap (e x) (e (f x)) * (e.symm.trans f).trans e := by
ext
rw [← Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, mul_def, Equiv.symm_trans_swap_trans, mul_def]
repeat (rw [trans_apply])
simp [swap, swapCore]
split_ifs <;> rfl
have hefx : e x ≠ e (f x) := mt e.injective.eq_iff.1 hfx
rw [if_neg hfx, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e hy, this, signAux_mul, signAux_swap hefx]
simp only [neg_neg, one_mul, neg_mul]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_eq_sign_aux2 Equiv.Perm.signAux_eq_signAux2
def signAux3 [Finite α] (f : Perm α) {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → ℤˣ :=
Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => signAux2 l f) fun l₁ l₂ h ↦ by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin α with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
refine Function.hfunext (forall_congr fun _ ↦ propext h.mem_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _ ↦ ?_
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => h₁ _, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => h₂ _]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux3 Equiv.Perm.signAux3
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Sign.lean | 335 | 351 | theorem signAux3_mul_and_swap [Finite α] (f g : Perm α) (s : Multiset α) (hs : ∀ x, x ∈ s) :
signAux3 (f * g) hs = signAux3 f hs * signAux3 g hs ∧
Pairwise fun x y => signAux3 (swap x y) hs = -1 := by |
obtain ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin α
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn with | _ l => ?_
show
signAux2 l (f * g) = signAux2 l f * signAux2 l g ∧
Pairwise fun x y => signAux2 l (swap x y) = -1
have hfg : (e.symm.trans (f * g)).trans e = (e.symm.trans f).trans e * (e.symm.trans g).trans e :=
Equiv.ext fun h => by simp [mul_apply]
constructor
· rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, ←
signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, ← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _,
hfg, signAux_mul]
· intro x y hxy
rw [← e.injective.ne_iff] at hxy
rw [← signAux_eq_signAux2 _ _ e fun _ _ => hs _, symm_trans_swap_trans, signAux_swap hxy]
|
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Satisfiability
#align_import model_theory.types from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98bd247d933fb581ff37244a5998bd33d81dd46d"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v w w'
open Cardinal Set
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
namespace Theory
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} (T : L.Theory) (α : Type w)
structure CompleteType where
toTheory : L[[α]].Theory
subset' : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊆ toTheory
isMaximal' : toTheory.IsMaximal
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.to_Theory FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.toTheory
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.subset' FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.subset'
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.is_maximal' FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.isMaximal'
variable {T α}
namespace CompleteType
attribute [coe] CompleteType.toTheory
instance Sentence.instSetLike : SetLike (T.CompleteType α) (L[[α]].Sentence) :=
⟨fun p => p.toTheory, fun p q h => by
cases p
cases q
congr ⟩
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.sentence.set_like FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.Sentence.instSetLike
theorem isMaximal (p : T.CompleteType α) : IsMaximal (p : L[[α]].Theory) :=
p.isMaximal'
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.is_maximal FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.isMaximal
theorem subset (p : T.CompleteType α) : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊆ (p : L[[α]].Theory) :=
p.subset'
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.subset FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.subset
theorem mem_or_not_mem (p : T.CompleteType α) (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) : φ ∈ p ∨ φ.not ∈ p :=
p.isMaximal.mem_or_not_mem φ
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.mem_or_not_mem FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.mem_or_not_mem
theorem mem_of_models (p : T.CompleteType α) {φ : L[[α]].Sentence}
(h : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊨ᵇ φ) : φ ∈ p :=
(p.mem_or_not_mem φ).resolve_right fun con =>
((models_iff_not_satisfiable _).1 h)
(p.isMaximal.1.mono (union_subset p.subset (singleton_subset_iff.2 con)))
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.mem_of_models FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.mem_of_models
theorem not_mem_iff (p : T.CompleteType α) (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) : φ.not ∈ p ↔ ¬φ ∈ p :=
⟨fun hf ht => by
have h : ¬IsSatisfiable ({φ, φ.not} : L[[α]].Theory) := by
rintro ⟨@⟨_, _, h, _⟩⟩
simp only [model_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, forall_eq] at h
exact h.2 h.1
refine h (p.isMaximal.1.mono ?_)
rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨ht, hf⟩, (p.mem_or_not_mem φ).resolve_left⟩
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.not_mem_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.not_mem_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_setOf_mem {φ : L[[α]].Sentence} :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | φ ∈ p }ᶜ = { p : T.CompleteType α | φ.not ∈ p } :=
ext fun _ => (not_mem_iff _ _).symm
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_type.compl_set_of_mem FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.compl_setOf_mem
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Types.lean | 115 | 126 | theorem setOf_subset_eq_empty_iff (S : L[[α]].Theory) :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | S ⊆ ↑p } = ∅ ↔
¬((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ∪ S).IsSatisfiable := by |
rw [iff_not_comm, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, Classical.not_not, Set.Nonempty]
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨⟨L[[α]].completeTheory h.some, (subset_union_left (t := S)).trans completeTheory.subset,
completeTheory.isMaximal (L[[α]]) h.some⟩,
(((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T).subset_union_right).trans completeTheory.subset⟩,
?_⟩
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact p.isMaximal.1.mono (union_subset p.subset hp)
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
#align_import order.liminf_limsup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ffde2d8a6e689149e44fd95fa862c23a57f8c780"
set_option autoImplicit true
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section Relation
def IsBounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ᶠ x in f, r x b
#align filter.is_bounded Filter.IsBounded
def IsBoundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsBounded r
#align filter.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBoundedUnder
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {f g : Filter α}
theorem isBounded_iff : f.IsBounded r ↔ ∃ s ∈ f.sets, ∃ b, s ⊆ { x | r x b } :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨{ a | r a b }, hb, b, Subset.refl _⟩) fun ⟨_, hs, b, hb⟩ =>
⟨b, mem_of_superset hs hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_iff Filter.isBounded_iff
theorem isBoundedUnder_of {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (∃ b, ∀ x, r (u x) b) → f.IsBoundedUnder r u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, r (u x) b from eventually_of_forall hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_of Filter.isBoundedUnder_of
theorem isBounded_bot : IsBounded r ⊥ ↔ Nonempty α := by simp [IsBounded, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_bounded_bot Filter.isBounded_bot
theorem isBounded_top : IsBounded r ⊤ ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x, r x t := by simp [IsBounded, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.is_bounded_top Filter.isBounded_top
theorem isBounded_principal (s : Set α) : IsBounded r (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x ∈ s, r x t := by
simp [IsBounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_bounded_principal Filter.isBounded_principal
theorem isBounded_sup [IsTrans α r] [IsDirected α r] :
IsBounded r f → IsBounded r g → IsBounded r (f ⊔ g)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ =>
let ⟨b, rb₁b, rb₂b⟩ := directed_of r b₁ b₂
⟨b, eventually_sup.mpr
⟨h₁.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₁b, h₂.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₂b⟩⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_sup Filter.isBounded_sup
theorem IsBounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : IsBounded r g → IsBounded r f
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, h hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.mono Filter.IsBounded.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono {f g : Filter β} {u : β → α} (h : f ≤ g) :
g.IsBoundedUnder r u → f.IsBoundedUnder r u := fun hg => IsBounded.mono (map_mono h) hg
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_le [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u) (hv : v ≤ᶠ[l] u) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l v := by
apply hu.imp
exact fun b hb => (eventually_map.1 hb).mp <| hv.mono fun x => le_trans
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_le Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u) (hv : u ≤ᶠ[l] v) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l v :=
IsBoundedUnder.mono_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu hv
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_ge Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge
theorem isBoundedUnder_const [IsRefl α r] {l : Filter β} {a : α} : IsBoundedUnder r l fun _ => a :=
⟨a, eventually_map.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => refl _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_const Filter.isBoundedUnder_const
theorem IsBounded.isBoundedUnder {q : β → β → Prop} {u : α → β}
(hu : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (u a₀) (u a₁)) : f.IsBounded r → f.IsBoundedUnder q u
| ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨u b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, q (u x) (u b) from h.mono fun x => hu x b⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBounded.isBoundedUnder
theorem IsBoundedUnder.comp {l : Filter γ} {q : β → β → Prop} {u : γ → α} {v : α → β}
(hv : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (v a₀) (v a₁)) : l.IsBoundedUnder r u → l.IsBoundedUnder q (v ∘ u)
| ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨v a, show ∀ᶠ x in map u l, q (v x) (v a) from h.mono fun x => hv x a⟩
lemma _root_.BddAbove.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddAbove (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_upperBounds] using hb⟩
lemma _root_.BddBelow.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddBelow (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hb⟩
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 157 | 165 | theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f := by |
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [eventually_map] at hb
obtain ⟨b', h⟩ := exists_gt b
have hb' := (tendsto_atTop.mp hf) b'
have : { x : α | f x ≤ b } ∩ { x : α | b' ≤ f x } = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x hx => (not_le_of_lt h) (le_trans hx.2 hx.1)
exact (nonempty_of_mem (hb.and hb')).ne_empty this
|
import Batteries.Data.RBMap.Alter
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
namespace Batteries
namespace RBNode
open RBColor
attribute [simp] fold foldl foldr Any forM foldlM Ordered
@[simp] theorem min?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.min? = t.max? := by
unfold RBNode.max?; split <;> simp [RBNode.min?]
unfold RBNode.min?; rw [min?.match_1.eq_3]
· apply min?_reverse
· simpa [reverse_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem max?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.max? = t.min? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_nil {x} : ¬x ∈ (.nil : RBNode α) := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
@[simp] theorem mem_node {y c a x b} :
y ∈ (.node c a x b : RBNode α) ↔ y = x ∨ y ∈ a ∨ y ∈ b := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
theorem All_def {t : RBNode α} : t.All p ↔ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_imp, forall_and, *]
theorem Any_def {t : RBNode α} : t.Any p ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_and_right, exists_or, *]
theorem memP_def : MemP cut t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_def : Mem cmp x t ↔ ∃ y ∈ t, cmp x y = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} (h : cmp x y = .eq) :
Mem cmp x t ↔ Mem cmp y t := by simp [Mem, TransCmp.cmp_congr_left' h]
theorem isOrdered_iff' [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t L R ↔
(∀ a ∈ L, t.All (cmpLT cmp a ·)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ R, t.All (cmpLT cmp · a)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ L, ∀ b ∈ R, cmpLT cmp a b) ∧
Ordered cmp t := by
induction t generalizing L R with
| nil =>
simp [isOrdered]; split <;> simp [cmpLT_iff]
next h => intro _ ha _ hb; cases h _ _ ha hb
| node _ l v r =>
simp [isOrdered, *]
exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨Ll, lv, Lv, ol⟩, ⟨vr, rR, vR, or⟩⟩ => ⟨
fun _ h => ⟨Lv _ h, Ll _ h, (Lv _ h).trans_l vr⟩,
fun _ h => ⟨vR _ h, (vR _ h).trans_r lv, rR _ h⟩,
fun _ hL _ hR => (Lv _ hL).trans (vR _ hR),
lv, vr, ol, or⟩,
fun ⟨hL, hR, _, lv, vr, ol, or⟩ => ⟨
⟨fun _ h => (hL _ h).2.1, lv, fun _ h => (hL _ h).1, ol⟩,
⟨vr, fun _ h => (hR _ h).2.2, fun _ h => (hR _ h).1, or⟩⟩⟩
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/RBMap/Lemmas.lean | 67 | 68 | theorem isOrdered_iff [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t ↔ Ordered cmp t := by | simp [isOrdered_iff']
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
#align is_closed_Union isClosed_iUnion_of_finite
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
#align is_closed_imp isClosed_imp
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
#align is_closed.not IsClosed.not
theorem mem_interior : x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp only [interior, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_interior mem_interiorₓ
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_interior : IsOpen (interior s) :=
isOpen_sUnion fun _ => And.left
#align is_open_interior isOpen_interior
theorem interior_subset : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ => And.right
#align interior_subset interior_subset
theorem interior_maximal (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align interior_maximal interior_maximal
theorem IsOpen.interior_eq (h : IsOpen s) : interior s = s :=
interior_subset.antisymm (interior_maximal (Subset.refl s) h)
#align is_open.interior_eq IsOpen.interior_eq
theorem interior_eq_iff_isOpen : interior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isOpen_interior, IsOpen.interior_eq⟩
#align interior_eq_iff_is_open interior_eq_iff_isOpen
theorem subset_interior_iff_isOpen : s ⊆ interior s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [interior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
#align subset_interior_iff_is_open subset_interior_iff_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.subset_interior_iff (h₁ : IsOpen s) : s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h interior_subset, fun h₂ => interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
#align is_open.subset_interior_iff IsOpen.subset_interior_iff
theorem subset_interior_iff : t ⊆ interior s ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨interior s, isOpen_interior, h, interior_subset⟩, fun ⟨_U, hU, htU, hUs⟩ =>
htU.trans (interior_maximal hUs hU)⟩
#align subset_interior_iff subset_interior_iff
lemma interior_subset_iff : interior s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t := by
simp [interior]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem interior_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (Subset.trans interior_subset h) isOpen_interior
#align interior_mono interior_mono
@[simp]
theorem interior_empty : interior (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isOpen_empty.interior_eq
#align interior_empty interior_empty
@[simp]
theorem interior_univ : interior (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isOpen_univ.interior_eq
#align interior_univ interior_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_eq_univ : interior s = univ ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => univ_subset_iff.mp <| h.symm.trans_le interior_subset, fun h => h.symm ▸ interior_univ⟩
#align interior_eq_univ interior_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_interior : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
isOpen_interior.interior_eq
#align interior_interior interior_interior
@[simp]
theorem interior_inter : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
(Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono) s t).antisymm <|
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) <|
isOpen_interior.inter isOpen_interior
#align interior_inter interior_inter
theorem Set.Finite.interior_biInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
hs.induction_on (by simp) <| by intros; simp [*]
theorem Set.Finite.interior_sInter {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, hS.interior_biInter]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.interior_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.interior_biInter f
#align finset.interior_Inter Finset.interior_iInter
@[simp]
theorem interior_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) := by
rw [← sInter_range, (finite_range f).interior_sInter, biInter_range]
#align interior_Inter interior_iInter_of_finite
theorem interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty (h₁ : IsClosed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) : interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have : interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s := fun x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : IsOpen u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun hx₂ : x ∉ s =>
have : u \ s ⊆ t := fun x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂
have : u \ s ⊆ interior t := by rwa [(IsOpen.sdiff hu₁ h₁).subset_interior_iff]
have : u \ s ⊆ ∅ := by rwa [h₂] at this
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
Subset.antisymm (interior_maximal this isOpen_interior) (interior_mono subset_union_left)
#align interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty
theorem isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_isOpen]
simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
#align is_open_iff_forall_mem_open isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open
theorem interior_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set X) : interior (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, interior (s i) :=
subset_iInter fun _ => interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
#align interior_Inter_subset interior_iInter_subset
theorem interior_iInter₂_subset (p : ι → Sort*) (s : ∀ i, p i → Set X) :
interior (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), interior (s i j) :=
(interior_iInter_subset _).trans <| iInter_mono fun _ => interior_iInter_subset _
#align interior_Inter₂_subset interior_iInter₂_subset
theorem interior_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set X)) : interior (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s :=
calc
interior (⋂₀ S) = interior (⋂ s ∈ S, s) := by rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
_ ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := interior_iInter₂_subset _ _
#align interior_sInter_subset interior_sInter_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' interior).HasBasis p fun i => interior (s i) :=
h.lift' fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono
theorem Filter.lift'_interior_le (l : Filter X) : l.lift' interior ≤ l := fun _s hs ↦
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (ho : ∀ i, p i → IsOpen (s i)) : l.lift' interior = l :=
le_antisymm l.lift'_interior_le <| h.lift'_interior.ge_iff.2 fun i hi ↦ by
simpa only [(ho i hi).interior_eq] using h.mem_of_mem hi
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_closure : IsClosed (closure s) :=
isClosed_sInter fun _ => And.left
#align is_closed_closure isClosed_closure
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter fun _ => And.right
#align subset_closure subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : X} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align not_mem_of_not_mem_closure not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
theorem closure_minimal (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align closure_minimal closure_minimal
theorem Disjoint.closure_left (hd : Disjoint s t) (ht : IsOpen t) :
Disjoint (closure s) t :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_left <| closure_minimal hd.subset_compl_right ht.isClosed_compl
#align disjoint.closure_left Disjoint.closure_left
theorem Disjoint.closure_right (hd : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
Disjoint s (closure t) :=
(hd.symm.closure_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.closure_right Disjoint.closure_right
theorem IsClosed.closure_eq (h : IsClosed s) : closure s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (Subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
#align is_closed.closure_eq IsClosed.closure_eq
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : closure s ⊆ s :=
closure_minimal (Subset.refl _) hs
#align is_closed.closure_subset IsClosed.closure_subset
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset_iff (h₁ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => closure_minimal h h₁⟩
#align is_closed.closure_subset_iff IsClosed.closure_subset_iff
theorem IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) :
x ∈ s ↔ closure ({x} : Set X) ⊆ s :=
(hs.closure_subset_iff.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff).symm
#align is_closed.mem_iff_closure_subset IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem closure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (Subset.trans h subset_closure) isClosed_closure
#align closure_mono closure_mono
theorem monotone_closure (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Monotone (@closure X _) := fun _ _ =>
closure_mono
#align monotone_closure monotone_closure
theorem diff_subset_closure_iff : s \ t ⊆ closure t ↔ s ⊆ closure t := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, union_eq_self_of_subset_left subset_closure]
#align diff_subset_closure_iff diff_subset_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : Set X) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure X).map_inf_le s t
#align closure_inter_subset_inter_closure closure_inter_subset_inter_closure
theorem isClosed_of_closure_subset (h : closure s ⊆ s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [subset_closure.antisymm h]; exact isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_of_closure_subset isClosed_of_closure_subset
theorem closure_eq_iff_isClosed : closure s = s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isClosed_closure, IsClosed.closure_eq⟩
#align closure_eq_iff_is_closed closure_eq_iff_isClosed
theorem closure_subset_iff_isClosed : closure s ⊆ s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨isClosed_of_closure_subset, IsClosed.closure_subset⟩
#align closure_subset_iff_is_closed closure_subset_iff_isClosed
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isClosed_empty.closure_eq
#align closure_empty closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty_iff (s : Set X) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, fun h => h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
#align closure_empty_iff closure_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_nonempty_iff : (closure s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, closure_empty_iff]
#align closure_nonempty_iff closure_nonempty_iff
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.of_closure, Set.Nonempty.closure⟩ := closure_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty.of_closure Set.Nonempty.of_closure
#align set.nonempty.closure Set.Nonempty.closure
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isClosed_univ.closure_eq
#align closure_univ closure_univ
@[simp]
theorem closure_closure : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
isClosed_closure.closure_eq
#align closure_closure closure_closure
theorem closure_eq_compl_interior_compl : closure s = (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [interior, closure, compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of]
simp only [compl_subset_compl, isOpen_compl_iff]
#align closure_eq_compl_interior_compl closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_union : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, compl_inter]
#align closure_union closure_union
theorem Set.Finite.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, hs.interior_biInter]
theorem Set.Finite.closure_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
closure (⋃₀ S) = ⋃ s ∈ S, closure s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hS.closure_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.closure_biUnion f
#align finset.closure_bUnion Finset.closure_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem closure_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) := by
rw [← sUnion_range, (finite_range _).closure_sUnion, biUnion_range]
#align closure_Union closure_iUnion_of_finite
theorem interior_subset_closure : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
Subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
#align interior_subset_closure interior_subset_closure
@[simp]
theorem interior_compl : interior sᶜ = (closure s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align interior_compl interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_compl : closure sᶜ = (interior s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align closure_compl closure_compl
theorem mem_closure_iff :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, IsOpen o → x ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h o oo ao =>
by_contradiction fun os =>
have : s ⊆ oᶜ := fun x xs xo => os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩
closure_minimal this (isClosed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
fun H _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun nc =>
let ⟨_, hc, hs⟩ := H _ h₁.isOpen_compl nc
hc (h₂ hs)⟩
#align mem_closure_iff mem_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff (h : IsOpen t) :
(closure s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hxcs, hxt⟩ => inter_comm t s ▸ mem_closure_iff.1 hxcs t h hxt, fun h =>
h.mono <| inf_le_inf_right t subset_closure⟩
#align closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff
theorem Filter.le_lift'_closure (l : Filter X) : l ≤ l.lift' closure :=
le_lift'.2 fun _ h => mem_of_superset h subset_closure
#align filter.le_lift'_closure Filter.le_lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' closure).HasBasis p fun i => closure (s i) :=
h.lift' (monotone_closure X)
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (hc : ∀ i, p i → IsClosed (s i)) : l.lift' closure = l :=
le_antisymm (h.ge_iff.2 fun i hi => (hc i hi).closure_eq ▸ mem_lift' (h.mem_of_mem hi))
l.le_lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure_eq_self Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot {l : Filter X} : l.lift' closure = ⊥ ↔ l = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique <| h ▸ l.le_lift'_closure, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ by rw [lift'_bot (monotone_closure _), closure_empty, principal_empty]⟩
#align filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot
theorem dense_iff_closure_eq : Dense s ↔ closure s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align dense_iff_closure_eq dense_iff_closure_eq
alias ⟨Dense.closure_eq, _⟩ := dense_iff_closure_eq
#align dense.closure_eq Dense.closure_eq
theorem interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl : interior s = ∅ ↔ Dense sᶜ := by
rw [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_compl, compl_univ_iff]
#align interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl
theorem Dense.interior_compl (h : Dense s) : interior sᶜ = ∅ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 <| by rwa [compl_compl]
#align dense.interior_compl Dense.interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem dense_closure : Dense (closure s) ↔ Dense s := by
rw [Dense, Dense, closure_closure]
#align dense_closure dense_closure
protected alias ⟨_, Dense.closure⟩ := dense_closure
alias ⟨Dense.of_closure, _⟩ := dense_closure
#align dense.of_closure Dense.of_closure
#align dense.closure Dense.closure
@[simp]
theorem dense_univ : Dense (univ : Set X) := fun _ => subset_closure trivial
#align dense_univ dense_univ
theorem dense_iff_inter_open :
Dense s ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U.Nonempty → (U ∩ s).Nonempty := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rintro U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (h _) U U_op x_in
· intro x
rw [mem_closure_iff]
intro U U_op x_in
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩
#align dense_iff_inter_open dense_iff_inter_open
alias ⟨Dense.inter_open_nonempty, _⟩ := dense_iff_inter_open
#align dense.inter_open_nonempty Dense.inter_open_nonempty
theorem Dense.exists_mem_open (hs : Dense s) {U : Set X} (ho : IsOpen U)
(hne : U.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ U :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho hne
⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩
#align dense.exists_mem_open Dense.exists_mem_open
theorem Dense.nonempty_iff (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty ↔ Nonempty X :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty _ isOpen_univ ⟨x, trivial⟩
⟨y, hy.2⟩⟩
#align dense.nonempty_iff Dense.nonempty_iff
theorem Dense.nonempty [h : Nonempty X] (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.nonempty_iff.2 h
#align dense.nonempty Dense.nonempty
@[mono]
theorem Dense.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : Dense s₁) : Dense s₂ := fun x =>
closure_mono h (hd x)
#align dense.mono Dense.mono
theorem dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open :
Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) ↔ ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro hd ho
exact (hd.inter_open_nonempty _ ho (singleton_nonempty _)).ne_empty (inter_compl_self _)
· refine fun ho => dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU hne => inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 fun hUx => ?_
obtain rfl : U = {x} := eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem.2 ⟨hne, hUx⟩
exact ho hU
#align dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_interior (s : Set X) : closure s \ interior s = frontier s :=
rfl
#align closure_diff_interior closure_diff_interior
lemma disjoint_interior_frontier : Disjoint (interior s) (frontier s) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← closure_diff_interior, diff_eq,
← inter_assoc, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, compl_inter_self, empty_inter]
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right_self, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset_closure]
#align closure_diff_frontier closure_diff_frontier
@[simp]
theorem self_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right, diff_eq_empty.2 subset_closure,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset, empty_union]
#align self_diff_frontier self_diff_frontier
theorem frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure : frontier s = closure s ∩ closure sᶜ := by
rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
#align frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure
theorem frontier_subset_closure : frontier s ⊆ closure s :=
diff_subset
#align frontier_subset_closure frontier_subset_closure
theorem IsClosed.frontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s ⊆ s :=
frontier_subset_closure.trans hs.closure_eq.subset
#align is_closed.frontier_subset IsClosed.frontier_subset
theorem frontier_closure_subset : frontier (closure s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff closure_closure.subset <| interior_mono subset_closure
#align frontier_closure_subset frontier_closure_subset
theorem frontier_interior_subset : frontier (interior s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff (closure_mono interior_subset) interior_interior.symm.subset
#align frontier_interior_subset frontier_interior_subset
@[simp]
theorem frontier_compl (s : Set X) : frontier sᶜ = frontier s := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
#align frontier_compl frontier_compl
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ : frontier (univ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_univ frontier_univ
@[simp]
theorem frontier_empty : frontier (∅ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_empty frontier_empty
theorem frontier_inter_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure t ∪ closure s ∩ frontier t := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union]
refine (inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t)).trans_eq ?_
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc,
inter_comm (closure t)]
#align frontier_inter_subset frontier_inter_subset
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 719 | 721 | theorem frontier_union_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure tᶜ ∪ closure sᶜ ∩ frontier t := by |
simpa only [frontier_compl, ← compl_union] using frontier_inter_subset sᶜ tᶜ
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.