Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
#align_import ring_theory.class_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"565eb991e264d0db702722b4bde52ee5173c9950"
variable {R K L : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [DecidableEq L]
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
variable [Algebra K L] [FiniteDimensional K L]
variable [Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R K L]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open IsLocalization IsFractionRing FractionalIdeal Units
section
variable (R K)
irreducible_def toPrincipalIdeal : Kˣ →* (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ :=
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨spanSingleton _ x, spanSingleton _ x⁻¹, by
simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.mul_inv', spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton], by
simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.inv_mul', spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]⟩
map_mul' := fun x y =>
ext (by simp only [Units.val_mk, Units.val_mul, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton])
map_one' := ext (by simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.val_mk, Units.val_one]) }
#align to_principal_ideal toPrincipalIdeal
variable {R K}
@[simp]
theorem coe_toPrincipalIdeal (x : Kˣ) :
(toPrincipalIdeal R K x : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = spanSingleton _ (x : K) := by
simp only [toPrincipalIdeal]; rfl
#align coe_to_principal_ideal coe_toPrincipalIdeal
@[simp]
theorem toPrincipalIdeal_eq_iff {I : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ} {x : Kˣ} :
toPrincipalIdeal R K x = I ↔ spanSingleton R⁰ (x : K) = I := by
simp only [toPrincipalIdeal]; exact Units.ext_iff
#align to_principal_ideal_eq_iff toPrincipalIdeal_eq_iff
theorem mem_principal_ideals_iff {I : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ} :
I ∈ (toPrincipalIdeal R K).range ↔ ∃ x : K, spanSingleton R⁰ x = I := by
simp only [MonoidHom.mem_range, toPrincipalIdeal_eq_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
· exact ⟨x, hx⟩
· refine ⟨Units.mk0 x ?_, hx⟩
rintro rfl
simp [I.ne_zero.symm] at hx
#align mem_principal_ideals_iff mem_principal_ideals_iff
instance PrincipalIdeals.normal : (toPrincipalIdeal R K).range.Normal :=
Subgroup.normal_of_comm _
#align principal_ideals.normal PrincipalIdeals.normal
end
variable (R)
variable [IsDomain R]
def ClassGroup :=
(FractionalIdeal R⁰ (FractionRing R))ˣ ⧸ (toPrincipalIdeal R (FractionRing R)).range
#align class_group ClassGroup
noncomputable instance : CommGroup (ClassGroup R) :=
QuotientGroup.Quotient.commGroup (toPrincipalIdeal R (FractionRing R)).range
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (ClassGroup R) := ⟨1⟩
variable {R}
noncomputable def ClassGroup.mk : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ →* ClassGroup R :=
(QuotientGroup.mk' (toPrincipalIdeal R (FractionRing R)).range).comp
(Units.map (FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv R⁰ K (FractionRing R)))
#align class_group.mk ClassGroup.mk
-- Can't be `@[simp]` because it can't figure out the quotient relation.
theorem ClassGroup.Quot_mk_eq_mk (I : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ (FractionRing R))ˣ) :
Quot.mk _ I = ClassGroup.mk I := by
rw [ClassGroup.mk, canonicalEquiv_self, RingEquiv.coe_monoidHom_refl, Units.map_id]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [MonoidHom.comp_apply]
rw [MonoidHom.id_apply, QuotientGroup.mk'_apply]
rfl
theorem ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk {I J : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ <| FractionRing R)ˣ} :
ClassGroup.mk I = ClassGroup.mk J ↔
∃ x : (FractionRing R)ˣ, I * toPrincipalIdeal R (FractionRing R) x = J := by
erw [QuotientGroup.mk'_eq_mk', canonicalEquiv_self, Units.map_id, Set.exists_range_iff]
rfl
#align class_group.mk_eq_mk ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk
theorem ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal {I J : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ <| FractionRing R)ˣ}
{I' J' : Ideal R} (hI : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ <| FractionRing R) = I')
(hJ : (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ <| FractionRing R) = J') :
ClassGroup.mk I = ClassGroup.mk J ↔
∃ x y : R, x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ Ideal.span {x} * I' = Ideal.span {y} * J' := by
rw [ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Units.val_mul, hI, coe_toPrincipalIdeal, mul_comm,
spanSingleton_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal] at hJ
exact ⟨_, _, sec_fst_ne_zero (R := R) le_rfl x.ne_zero,
sec_snd_ne_zero (R := R) le_rfl (x : FractionRing R), hJ⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hx, hy, h⟩
have : IsUnit (mk' (FractionRing R) x ⟨y, mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero hy⟩) := by
simpa only [isUnit_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, mk'_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero] using hx
refine ⟨this.unit, ?_⟩
rw [mul_comm, ← Units.eq_iff, Units.val_mul, coe_toPrincipalIdeal]
convert
(mk'_mul_coeIdeal_eq_coeIdeal (FractionRing R) <| mem_nonZeroDivisors_of_ne_zero hy).2 h
#align class_group.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ClassGroup.lean | 147 | 161 | theorem ClassGroup.mk_eq_one_of_coe_ideal {I : (FractionalIdeal R⁰ <| FractionRing R)ˣ}
{I' : Ideal R} (hI : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ <| FractionRing R) = I') :
ClassGroup.mk I = 1 ↔ ∃ x : R, x ≠ 0 ∧ I' = Ideal.span {x} := by |
rw [← _root_.map_one (ClassGroup.mk (R := R) (K := FractionRing R)),
ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal hI (?_ : _ = ↑(⊤ : Ideal R))]
any_goals rfl
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, y, hx, hy, h⟩
rw [Ideal.mul_top] at h
rcases Ideal.mem_span_singleton_mul.mp ((Ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem _).mp h.ge) with
⟨i, _hi, rfl⟩
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, Ideal.span_singleton_mul_right_inj hx] at h
exact ⟨i, right_ne_zero_of_mul hy, h⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨1, x, one_ne_zero, hx, by rw [Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.top_mul, Ideal.mul_top]⟩
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import topology.uniform_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"195fcd60ff2bfe392543bceb0ec2adcdb472db4c"
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
def idRel {α : Type*} :=
{ p : α × α | p.1 = p.2 }
#align id_rel idRel
@[simp]
theorem mem_idRel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @idRel α ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_id_rel mem_idRel
@[simp]
theorem idRel_subset {s : Set (α × α)} : idRel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s := by
simp [subset_def]
#align id_rel_subset idRel_subset
def compRel (r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)) :=
{ p : α × α | ∃ z : α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂ }
#align comp_rel compRel
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Uniformity] infixl:62 " ○ " => compRel
open Uniformity
@[simp]
theorem mem_compRel {α : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)} {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ r₁ ○ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_comp_rel mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem swap_idRel : Prod.swap '' idRel = @idRel α :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simpa [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap] using eq_comm
#align swap_id_rel swap_idRel
theorem Monotone.compRel [Preorder β] {f g : β → Set (α × α)} (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ○ g x := fun _ _ h _ ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
#align monotone.comp_rel Monotone.compRel
@[mono]
theorem compRel_mono {f g h k : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : f ⊆ h) (h₂ : g ⊆ k) : f ○ g ⊆ h ○ k :=
fun _ ⟨z, h, h'⟩ => ⟨z, h₁ h, h₂ h'⟩
#align comp_rel_mono compRel_mono
theorem prod_mk_mem_compRel {a b c : α} {s t : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ s ○ t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
#align prod_mk_mem_comp_rel prod_mk_mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem id_compRel {r : Set (α × α)} : idRel ○ r = r :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
#align id_comp_rel id_compRel
theorem compRel_assoc {r s t : Set (α × α)} : r ○ s ○ t = r ○ (s ○ t) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩; simp only [mem_compRel]; tauto
#align comp_rel_assoc compRel_assoc
theorem left_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ t) : s ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨_x, y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨y, xy_in, h <| rfl⟩
#align left_subset_comp_rel left_subset_compRel
theorem right_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : t ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨x, _y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨x, h <| rfl, xy_in⟩
#align right_subset_comp_rel right_subset_compRel
theorem subset_comp_self {s : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
left_subset_compRel h
#align subset_comp_self subset_comp_self
theorem subset_iterate_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) (n : ℕ) :
t ⊆ (s ○ ·)^[n] t := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing t
exacts [Subset.rfl, (right_subset_compRel h).trans ihn]
#align subset_iterate_comp_rel subset_iterate_compRel
def SymmetricRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Prop :=
Prod.swap ⁻¹' V = V
#align symmetric_rel SymmetricRel
def symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Set (α × α) :=
V ∩ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V
#align symmetrize_rel symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetric_symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : SymmetricRel (symmetrizeRel V) := by
simp [SymmetricRel, symmetrizeRel, preimage_inter, inter_comm, ← preimage_comp]
#align symmetric_symmetrize_rel symmetric_symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetrizeRel_subset_self (V : Set (α × α)) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ V :=
sep_subset _ _
#align symmetrize_rel_subset_self symmetrizeRel_subset_self
@[mono]
theorem symmetrize_mono {V W : Set (α × α)} (h : V ⊆ W) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ symmetrizeRel W :=
inter_subset_inter h <| preimage_mono h
#align symmetrize_mono symmetrize_mono
theorem SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ V ↔ (y, x) ∈ V :=
Set.ext_iff.1 hV (y, x)
#align symmetric_rel.mk_mem_comm SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm
theorem SymmetricRel.eq {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' U = U :=
hU
#align symmetric_rel.eq SymmetricRel.eq
theorem SymmetricRel.inter {U V : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) (hV : SymmetricRel V) :
SymmetricRel (U ∩ V) := by rw [SymmetricRel, preimage_inter, hU.eq, hV.eq]
#align symmetric_rel.inter SymmetricRel.inter
structure UniformSpace.Core (α : Type u) where
uniformity : Filter (α × α)
refl : 𝓟 idRel ≤ uniformity
symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
#align uniform_space.core UniformSpace.Core
protected theorem UniformSpace.Core.comp_mem_uniformity_sets {c : Core α} {s : Set (α × α)}
(hs : s ∈ c.uniformity) : ∃ t ∈ c.uniformity, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| c.comp hs
def UniformSpace.Core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : Filter (α × α)) (refl : ∀ r ∈ U, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, Prod.swap ⁻¹' r ∈ U) (comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, t ○ t ⊆ r) :
UniformSpace.Core α :=
⟨U, fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm, fun _r ru =>
let ⟨_s, hs, hsr⟩ := comp _ ru
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) hsr⟩
#align uniform_space.core.mk' UniformSpace.Core.mk'
def UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis {α : Type u} (B : FilterBasis (α × α))
(refl : ∀ r ∈ B, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r) (symm : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ Prod.swap ⁻¹' r)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ○ t ⊆ r) : UniformSpace.Core α where
uniformity := B.filter
refl := B.hasBasis.ge_iff.mpr fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 <| refl _ ru
symm := (B.hasBasis.tendsto_iff B.hasBasis).mpr symm
comp := (HasBasis.le_basis_iff (B.hasBasis.lift' (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id))
B.hasBasis).2 comp
#align uniform_space.core.mk_of_basis UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis
def UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) :
TopologicalSpace α :=
.mkOfNhds fun x ↦ .comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity
#align uniform_space.core.to_topological_space UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace
theorem UniformSpace.Core.ext :
∀ {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace.Core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align uniform_space.core_eq UniformSpace.Core.ext
theorem UniformSpace.Core.nhds_toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : Core α) (x : α) :
@nhds α u.toTopologicalSpace x = comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity := by
apply TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun _ ↦ (basis_sets _).comap _)
· exact fun a U hU ↦ u.refl hU rfl
· intro a U hU
rcases u.comp_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with b hb
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with c hc
exact hVU ⟨b, hb, hc⟩
-- the topological structure is embedded in the uniform structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
class UniformSpace (α : Type u) extends TopologicalSpace α where
protected uniformity : Filter (α × α)
protected symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
protected comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
protected nhds_eq_comap_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) uniformity
#align uniform_space UniformSpace
#noalign uniform_space.mk' -- Can't be a `match_pattern`, so not useful anymore
def uniformity (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Filter (α × α) :=
@UniformSpace.uniformity α _
#align uniformity uniformity
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤[" u "]" => @uniformity _ u
@[inherit_doc] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: should we drop the `uniformity` def?
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤" => uniformity
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCoreEq {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := t
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq UniformSpace.ofCoreEq
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCore {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofCoreEq u _ rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core UniformSpace.ofCore
abbrev UniformSpace.toCore (u : UniformSpace α) : UniformSpace.Core α where
__ := u
refl := by
rintro U hU ⟨x, y⟩ (rfl : x = y)
have : Prod.mk x ⁻¹' U ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact preimage_mem_comap hU
convert mem_of_mem_nhds this
theorem UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace (u : UniformSpace α) :
u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by
rw [u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u.toCore.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace
@[deprecated UniformSpace.mk (since := "2024-03-20")]
def UniformSpace.ofNhdsEqComap (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (_t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : ∀ x, 𝓝 x = u.uniformity.comap (Prod.mk x)) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := h
@[ext]
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u₁] = 𝓤[u₂]) : u₁ = u₂ := by
have : u₁.toTopologicalSpace = u₂.toTopologicalSpace := TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [u₁.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u₂.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact congr_arg (comap _) h
cases u₁; cases u₂; congr
#align uniform_space_eq UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext_iff {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} :
u₁ = u₂ ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤[u₁] ↔ s ∈ 𝓤[u₂] :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore (u : UniformSpace α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace) : .ofCoreEq u.toCore t h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore
abbrev UniformSpace.replaceTopology {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := i
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
#align uniform_space.replace_topology UniformSpace.replaceTopology
theorem UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : u.replaceTopology h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.replace_topology_eq UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq
-- Porting note: rfc: use `UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis`? This will change defeq here and there
def UniformSpace.ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [OrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
UniformSpace α :=
.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 { x | d x.1 x.2 < r }
refl := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => principal_mono.2 <| idRel_subset.2 fun x => by simpa [refl]
symm := tendsto_iInf_iInf fun r => tendsto_iInf_iInf fun _ => tendsto_principal_principal.2
fun x hx => by rwa [mem_setOf, symm]
comp := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => let ⟨δ, h0, hδr⟩ := half r hr; le_principal_iff.2 <|
mem_of_superset
(mem_lift' <| mem_iInf_of_mem δ <| mem_iInf_of_mem h0 <| mem_principal_self _)
fun (x, z) ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩ => (triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (hδr _ h₁ _ h₂) }
#align uniform_space.of_fun UniformSpace.ofFun
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(h₀ : ∃ x : β, 0 < x) (d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
𝓤[.ofFun d refl symm triangle half].HasBasis ((0 : β) < ·) (fun ε => { x | d x.1 x.2 < ε }) :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun ε₁ h₁ ε₂ h₂ => ⟨min ε₁ ε₂, lt_min h₁ h₂, fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_left _ _),
fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_right _ _)⟩) h₀
#align uniform_space.has_basis_of_fun UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity nhds_eq_comap_uniformity
theorem isOpen_uniformity {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
#align is_open_uniformity isOpen_uniformity
theorem refl_le_uniformity : 𝓟 idRel ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@UniformSpace.toCore α _).refl
#align refl_le_uniformity refl_le_uniformity
instance uniformity.neBot [Nonempty α] : NeBot (𝓤 α) :=
diagonal_nonempty.principal_neBot.mono refl_le_uniformity
#align uniformity.ne_bot uniformity.neBot
theorem refl_mem_uniformity {x : α} {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : (x, x) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h rfl
#align refl_mem_uniformity refl_mem_uniformity
theorem mem_uniformity_of_eq {x y : α} {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (hx : x = y) : (x, y) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h hx
#align mem_uniformity_of_eq mem_uniformity_of_eq
theorem symm_le_uniformity : map (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 _) ≤ 𝓤 _ :=
UniformSpace.symm
#align symm_le_uniformity symm_le_uniformity
theorem comp_le_uniformity : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
UniformSpace.comp
#align comp_le_uniformity comp_le_uniformity
theorem lift'_comp_uniformity : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s) = 𝓤 α :=
comp_le_uniformity.antisymm <| le_lift'.2 fun _s hs ↦ mem_of_superset hs <|
subset_comp_self <| idRel_subset.2 fun _ ↦ refl_mem_uniformity hs
theorem tendsto_swap_uniformity : Tendsto (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 α) :=
symm_le_uniformity
#align tendsto_swap_uniformity tendsto_swap_uniformity
theorem comp_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| comp_le_uniformity hs
#align comp_mem_uniformity_sets comp_mem_uniformity_sets
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction' n with n ihn generalizing s
· simpa
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
#align eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
#align eventually_uniformity_comp_subset eventually_uniformity_comp_subset
theorem Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_trans {l : Filter β} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : β → α}
(h₁₂ : Tendsto (fun x => (f₁ x, f₂ x)) l (𝓤 α))
(h₂₃ : Tendsto (fun x => (f₂ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α)) : Tendsto (fun x => (f₁ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α) := by
refine le_trans (le_lift'.2 fun s hs => mem_map.2 ?_) comp_le_uniformity
filter_upwards [mem_map.1 (h₁₂ hs), mem_map.1 (h₂₃ hs)] with x hx₁₂ hx₂₃ using ⟨_, hx₁₂, hx₂₃⟩
#align filter.tendsto.uniformity_trans Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_trans
theorem Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_symm {l : Filter β} {f : β → α × α} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓤 α)) :
Tendsto (fun x => ((f x).2, (f x).1)) l (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.uniformity_symm Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_symm
theorem tendsto_diag_uniformity (f : β → α) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f x)) l (𝓤 α) := fun _s hs =>
mem_map.2 <| univ_mem' fun _ => refl_mem_uniformity hs
#align tendsto_diag_uniformity tendsto_diag_uniformity
theorem tendsto_const_uniformity {a : α} {f : Filter β} : Tendsto (fun _ => (a, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_diag_uniformity (fun _ => a) f
#align tendsto_const_uniformity tendsto_const_uniformity
theorem symm_of_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have : preimage Prod.swap s ∈ 𝓤 α := symm_le_uniformity hs
⟨s ∩ preimage Prod.swap s, inter_mem hs this, fun _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, h₁⟩, inter_subset_left⟩
#align symm_of_uniformity symm_of_uniformity
theorem comp_symm_of_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
let ⟨t', ht', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := symm_of_uniformity ht₁
⟨t', ht', ht'₁ _ _, Subset.trans (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id ht'₂) ht₂⟩
#align comp_symm_of_uniformity comp_symm_of_uniformity
theorem uniformity_le_symm : 𝓤 α ≤ @Prod.swap α α <$> 𝓤 α := by
rw [map_swap_eq_comap_swap]; exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.le_comap
#align uniformity_le_symm uniformity_le_symm
theorem uniformity_eq_symm : 𝓤 α = @Prod.swap α α <$> 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm uniformity_le_symm symm_le_uniformity
#align uniformity_eq_symm uniformity_eq_symm
@[simp]
theorem comap_swap_uniformity : comap (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) = 𝓤 α :=
(congr_arg _ uniformity_eq_symm).trans <| comap_map Prod.swap_injective
#align comap_swap_uniformity comap_swap_uniformity
theorem symmetrize_mem_uniformity {V : Set (α × α)} (h : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : symmetrizeRel V ∈ 𝓤 α := by
apply (𝓤 α).inter_sets h
rw [← image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, uniformity_eq_symm]
exact image_mem_map h
#align symmetrize_mem_uniformity symmetrize_mem_uniformity
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun s : Set (α × α) => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun t t_in =>
⟨symmetrizeRel t, symmetrize_mem_uniformity t_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel t,
symmetrizeRel_subset_self t⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_symmetric UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric
theorem uniformity_lift_le_swap {g : Set (α × α) → Filter β} {f : Filter β} (hg : Monotone g)
(h : ((𝓤 α).lift fun s => g (preimage Prod.swap s)) ≤ f) : (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ f :=
calc
(𝓤 α).lift g ≤ (Filter.map (@Prod.swap α α) <| 𝓤 α).lift g :=
lift_mono uniformity_le_symm le_rfl
_ ≤ _ := by rw [map_lift_eq2 hg, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact h
#align uniformity_lift_le_swap uniformity_lift_le_swap
theorem uniformity_lift_le_comp {f : Set (α × α) → Filter β} (h : Monotone f) :
((𝓤 α).lift fun s => f (s ○ s)) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f :=
calc
((𝓤 α).lift fun s => f (s ○ s)) = ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s).lift f := by
rw [lift_lift'_assoc]
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id
· exact h
_ ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f := lift_mono comp_le_uniformity le_rfl
#align uniformity_lift_le_comp uniformity_lift_le_comp
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem comp3_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ (t ○ t) ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_t', ht', ht's⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
let ⟨t, ht, htt'⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets ht'
⟨t, ht, (compRel_mono ((subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity ht)).trans htt') htt').trans ht's⟩
theorem comp_le_uniformity3 : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ (s ○ s)) ≤ 𝓤 α := fun _ h =>
let ⟨_t, htU, ht⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity h
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' htU) ht
#align comp_le_uniformity3 comp_le_uniformity3
theorem comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨w, w_in, w_sub⟩ : ∃ w ∈ 𝓤 α, w ○ w ⊆ s := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
use symmetrizeRel w, symmetrize_mem_uniformity w_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel w
have : symmetrizeRel w ⊆ w := symmetrizeRel_subset_self w
calc symmetrizeRel w ○ symmetrizeRel w
_ ⊆ w ○ w := by mono
_ ⊆ s := w_sub
#align comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
theorem subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity h)
#align subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity
theorem comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨w, w_in, _, w_sub⟩
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets w_in with ⟨t, t_in, t_symm, t_sub⟩
use t, t_in, t_symm
have : t ⊆ t ○ t := subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity t_in
-- Porting note: Needed the following `have`s to make `mono` work
have ht := Subset.refl t
have hw := Subset.refl w
calc
t ○ t ○ t ⊆ w ○ t := by mono
_ ⊆ w ○ (t ○ t) := by mono
_ ⊆ w ○ w := by mono
_ ⊆ s := w_sub
#align comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
def UniformSpace.ball (x : β) (V : Set (β × β)) : Set β :=
Prod.mk x ⁻¹' V
#align uniform_space.ball UniformSpace.ball
open UniformSpace (ball)
theorem UniformSpace.mem_ball_self (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : x ∈ ball x V :=
refl_mem_uniformity hV
#align uniform_space.mem_ball_self UniformSpace.mem_ball_self
theorem mem_ball_comp {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y z} (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) :
z ∈ ball x (V ○ W) :=
prod_mk_mem_compRel h h'
#align mem_ball_comp mem_ball_comp
theorem ball_subset_of_comp_subset {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y} (h : x ∈ ball y W) (h' : W ○ W ⊆ V) :
ball x W ⊆ ball y V := fun _z z_in => h' (mem_ball_comp h z_in)
#align ball_subset_of_comp_subset ball_subset_of_comp_subset
theorem ball_mono {V W : Set (β × β)} (h : V ⊆ W) (x : β) : ball x V ⊆ ball x W :=
preimage_mono h
#align ball_mono ball_mono
theorem ball_inter (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) = ball x V ∩ ball x W :=
preimage_inter
#align ball_inter ball_inter
theorem ball_inter_left (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) ⊆ ball x V :=
ball_mono inter_subset_left x
#align ball_inter_left ball_inter_left
theorem ball_inter_right (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) ⊆ ball x W :=
ball_mono inter_subset_right x
#align ball_inter_right ball_inter_right
theorem mem_ball_symmetry {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y} :
x ∈ ball y V ↔ y ∈ ball x V :=
show (x, y) ∈ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V ↔ (x, y) ∈ V by
unfold SymmetricRel at hV
rw [hV]
#align mem_ball_symmetry mem_ball_symmetry
theorem ball_eq_of_symmetry {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x} :
ball x V = { y | (y, x) ∈ V } := by
ext y
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hV]
exact Iff.rfl
#align ball_eq_of_symmetry ball_eq_of_symmetry
theorem mem_comp_of_mem_ball {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y z : β} (hV : SymmetricRel V)
(hx : x ∈ ball z V) (hy : y ∈ ball z W) : (x, y) ∈ V ○ W := by
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hV] at hx
exact ⟨z, hx, hy⟩
#align mem_comp_of_mem_ball mem_comp_of_mem_ball
theorem UniformSpace.isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align uniform_space.is_open_ball UniformSpace.isOpen_ball
theorem UniformSpace.isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) :
IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
theorem mem_comp_comp {V W M : Set (β × β)} (hW' : SymmetricRel W) {p : β × β} :
p ∈ V ○ M ○ W ↔ (ball p.1 V ×ˢ ball p.2 W ∩ M).Nonempty := by
cases' p with x y
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨w, hpw, hwz⟩, hzy⟩
exact ⟨(w, z), ⟨hpw, by rwa [mem_ball_symmetry hW']⟩, hwz⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨w, z⟩, ⟨w_in, z_in⟩, hwz⟩
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hW'] at z_in
exact ⟨z, ⟨w, w_in, hwz⟩, z_in⟩
#align mem_comp_comp mem_comp_comp
theorem mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
#align mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right
theorem mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ { p : α × α | p.2 = x → p.1 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_symm, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right]
simp only [map_def, mem_map, preimage_setOf_eq, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap]
#align mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem {x : α} {T : Set α} (hx : x ∈ T) (S : Set α) :
𝓝[S] x = (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (T ×ˢ S)).comap (Prod.mk x) := by
simp [nhdsWithin, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, hx]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} (S : Set α) :
𝓝[S] x = (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (univ ×ˢ S)).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem (mem_univ _) S
theorem isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set α} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s := by
simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap, ball]
#align is_open_iff_ball_subset isOpen_iff_ball_subset
theorem nhds_basis_uniformity' {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{x : α} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p fun i => ball x (s i) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact h.comap (Prod.mk x)
#align nhds_basis_uniformity' nhds_basis_uniformity'
theorem nhds_basis_uniformity {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{x : α} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p fun i => { y | (y, x) ∈ s i } := by
replace h := h.comap Prod.swap
rw [comap_swap_uniformity] at h
exact nhds_basis_uniformity' h
#align nhds_basis_uniformity nhds_basis_uniformity
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity' {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap fun y => (y, x) :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_of_same_basis <| (𝓤 α).basis_sets.comap _
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity' nhds_eq_comap_uniformity'
theorem UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff {x : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap]
simp_rw [ball]
#align uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff
theorem UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds (x : α) ⦃V : Set (α × α)⦄ (V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff]
exact ⟨V, V_in, Subset.rfl⟩
#align uniform_space.ball_mem_nhds UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds
theorem UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhdsWithin {x : α} {S : Set α} ⦃V : Set (α × α)⦄ (x_in : x ∈ S)
(V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝[S] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem x_in, mem_comap]
exact ⟨V, V_in, Subset.rfl⟩
theorem UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩
use symmetrizeRel V, symmetrize_mem_uniformity V_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel V
exact Subset.trans (ball_mono (symmetrizeRel_subset_self V) x) V_sub
· rintro ⟨V, V_in, _, V_sub⟩
exact ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩
#align uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff_symm UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds (x : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) (fun s : Set (α × α) => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s :=
⟨fun t => by simp [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm, and_assoc]⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_nhds UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds
open UniformSpace
theorem UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball {s : Set α} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ {V}, V ∈ 𝓤 α → SymmetricRel V → (s ∩ ball x V).Nonempty := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (hasBasis_nhds x), Set.Nonempty]
#align uniform_space.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball
theorem UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_ball {s : Set α} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ {V}, V ∈ 𝓤 α → (ball x V ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets)]
#align uniform_space.mem_closure_iff_ball UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_ball
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 806 | 813 | theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by |
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
#align_import data.set.equitable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
def EquitableOn [LE β] [Add β] [One β] (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a₁ a₂⦄, a₁ ∈ s → a₂ ∈ s → f a₁ ≤ f a₂ + 1
#align set.equitable_on Set.EquitableOn
@[simp]
theorem equitableOn_empty [LE β] [Add β] [One β] (f : α → β) : EquitableOn ∅ f := fun a _ ha =>
(Set.not_mem_empty a ha).elim
#align set.equitable_on_empty Set.equitableOn_empty
theorem equitableOn_iff_exists_le_le_add_one {s : Set α} {f : α → ℕ} :
s.EquitableOn f ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ f a ∧ f a ≤ b + 1 := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ x y hx hy => (hb x hx).2.trans (add_le_add_right (hb y hy).1 _)⟩
obtain rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩ := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
intro hs
by_cases h : ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≤ f y
· exact ⟨f x, fun y hy => ⟨h _ hy, hs hy hx⟩⟩
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨w, hw, hwx⟩ := h
refine ⟨f w, fun y hy => ⟨Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ ?_, hs hy hw⟩⟩
rw [(Nat.succ_le_of_lt hwx).antisymm (hs hx hw)]
exact hs hx hy
#align set.equitable_on_iff_exists_le_le_add_one Set.equitableOn_iff_exists_le_le_add_one
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Equitable.lean | 57 | 59 | theorem equitableOn_iff_exists_image_subset_icc {s : Set α} {f : α → ℕ} :
s.EquitableOn f ↔ ∃ b, f '' s ⊆ Icc b (b + 1) := by |
simpa only [image_subset_iff] using equitableOn_iff_exists_le_le_add_one
|
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Interval
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Binomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.HahnSeries.PowerSeries
import Mathlib.RingTheory.HahnSeries.Summable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
#align_import ring_theory.laurent_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
universe u
open scoped Classical
open HahnSeries Polynomial
noncomputable section
abbrev LaurentSeries (R : Type u) [Zero R] :=
HahnSeries ℤ R
#align laurent_series LaurentSeries
variable {R : Type*}
namespace LaurentSeries
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance : Coe (PowerSeries R) (LaurentSeries R) :=
⟨HahnSeries.ofPowerSeries ℤ R⟩
#noalign laurent_series.coe_power_series
@[simp]
theorem coeff_coe_powerSeries (x : PowerSeries R) (n : ℕ) :
HahnSeries.coeff (x : LaurentSeries R) n = PowerSeries.coeff R n x := by
rw [ofPowerSeries_apply_coeff]
#align laurent_series.coeff_coe_power_series LaurentSeries.coeff_coe_powerSeries
def powerSeriesPart (x : LaurentSeries R) : PowerSeries R :=
PowerSeries.mk fun n => x.coeff (x.order + n)
#align laurent_series.power_series_part LaurentSeries.powerSeriesPart
@[simp]
theorem powerSeriesPart_coeff (x : LaurentSeries R) (n : ℕ) :
PowerSeries.coeff R n x.powerSeriesPart = x.coeff (x.order + n) :=
PowerSeries.coeff_mk _ _
#align laurent_series.power_series_part_coeff LaurentSeries.powerSeriesPart_coeff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/LaurentSeries.lean | 106 | 108 | theorem powerSeriesPart_zero : powerSeriesPart (0 : LaurentSeries R) = 0 := by |
ext
simp [(PowerSeries.coeff _ _).map_zero] -- Note: this doesn't get picked up any more
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Squarefree.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
#align_import field_theory.separable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S]
def Separable (f : R[X]) : Prop :=
IsCoprime f (derivative f)
#align polynomial.separable Polynomial.Separable
theorem separable_def (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ IsCoprime f (derivative f) :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.separable_def Polynomial.separable_def
theorem separable_def' (f : R[X]) : f.Separable ↔ ∃ a b : R[X], a * f + b * (derivative f) = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.separable_def' Polynomial.separable_def'
theorem not_separable_zero [Nontrivial R] : ¬Separable (0 : R[X]) := by
rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
simp only [derivative_zero, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_ne_one] at h
#align polynomial.not_separable_zero Polynomial.not_separable_zero
theorem Separable.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] {f : R[X]} (h : f.Separable) : f ≠ 0 :=
(not_separable_zero <| · ▸ h)
@[simp]
theorem separable_one : (1 : R[X]).Separable :=
isCoprime_one_left
#align polynomial.separable_one Polynomial.separable_one
@[nontriviality]
theorem separable_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (f : R[X]) : f.Separable := by
simp [Separable, IsCoprime, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align polynomial.separable_of_subsingleton Polynomial.separable_of_subsingleton
theorem separable_X_add_C (a : R) : (X + C a).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
exact isCoprime_one_right
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_X_add_C Polynomial.separable_X_add_C
theorem separable_X : (X : R[X]).Separable := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_X]
exact isCoprime_one_right
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_X Polynomial.separable_X
theorem separable_C (r : R) : (C r).Separable ↔ IsUnit r := by
rw [separable_def, derivative_C, isCoprime_zero_right, isUnit_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.separable_C Polynomial.separable_C
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Separable.lean | 87 | 89 | theorem Separable.of_mul_left {f g : R[X]} (h : (f * g).Separable) : f.Separable := by |
have := h.of_mul_left_left; rw [derivative_mul] at this
exact IsCoprime.of_mul_right_left (IsCoprime.of_add_mul_left_right this)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_C Polynomial.eval₂_C
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X Polynomial.eval₂_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = f r * x ^ n := by
simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_monomial Polynomial.eval₂_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n).eval₂ f x = x ^ n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial]
convert eval₂_monomial f x (n := n) (r := 1)
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_pow Polynomial.eval₂_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum]
apply sum_add_index <;> simp [add_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_add Polynomial.eval₂_add
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_one : (1 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 1 := by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.eval₂_one Polynomial.eval₂_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) := by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit0 Polynomial.eval₂_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) := by
rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit1 Polynomial.eval₂_bit1
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p := by
have A : p.natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := Nat.lt_succ_self _
have B : (s • p).natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := (natDegree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt A
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range' _ _ _ A, sum_over_range' _ _ _ B] <;>
simp [mul_sum, mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.eval₂_smul Polynomial.eval₂_smul
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C_X : eval₂ C X p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on' p (fun p q hp hq => by simp [hp, hq]) fun n x => by
rw [eval₂_monomial, ← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul']
#align polynomial.eval₂_C_X Polynomial.eval₂_C_X
@[simps]
def eval₂AddMonoidHom : R[X] →+ S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom_apply Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).eval₂ f x = n := by
induction' n with n ih
-- Porting note: `Nat.zero_eq` is required.
· simp only [eval₂_zero, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· rw [n.cast_succ, eval₂_add, ih, eval₂_one, n.cast_succ]
#align polynomial.eval₂_nat_cast Polynomial.eval₂_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_nat_cast := eval₂_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_ofNat {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (f : R →+* S) (a : S) :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R[X])).eval₂ f a = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp [OfNat.ofNat]
variable [Semiring T]
theorem eval₂_sum (p : T[X]) (g : ℕ → T → R[X]) (x : S) :
(p.sum g).eval₂ f x = p.sum fun n a => (g n a).eval₂ f x := by
let T : R[X] →+ S :=
{ toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' := fun p q => eval₂_add _ _ }
have A : ∀ y, eval₂ f x y = T y := fun y => rfl
simp only [A]
rw [sum, map_sum, sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_sum Polynomial.eval₂_sum
theorem eval₂_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (x : S) : eval₂ f x l.sum = (l.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_list_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) l
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_sum Polynomial.eval₂_list_sum
theorem eval₂_multiset_sum (s : Multiset R[X]) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x s.sum = (s.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) s
#align polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum
theorem eval₂_finset_sum (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : S) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
map_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum
theorem eval₂_ofFinsupp {f : R →+* S} {x : S} {p : R[ℕ]} :
eval₂ f x (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = liftNC (↑f) (powersHom S x) p := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, toFinsupp_sum, support, coeff]
rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_of_finsupp Polynomial.eval₂_ofFinsupp
theorem eval₂_mul_noncomm (hf : ∀ k, Commute (f <| q.coeff k) x) :
eval₂ f x (p * q) = eval₂ f x p * eval₂ f x q := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff] at hf
simp only [← ofFinsupp_mul, eval₂_ofFinsupp]
exact liftNC_mul _ _ p q fun {k n} _hn => (hf k).pow_right n
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul_X : eval₂ f x (p * X) = eval₂ f x p * x := by
refine _root_.trans (eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun k => ?_) (by rw [eval₂_X])
rcases em (k = 1) with (rfl | hk)
· simp
· simp [coeff_X_of_ne_one hk]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_X Polynomial.eval₂_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_mul : eval₂ f x (X * p) = eval₂ f x p * x := by rw [X_mul, eval₂_mul_X]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_mul Polynomial.eval₂_X_mul
theorem eval₂_mul_C' (h : Commute (f a) x) : eval₂ f x (p * C a) = eval₂ f x p * f a := by
rw [eval₂_mul_noncomm, eval₂_C]
intro k
by_cases hk : k = 0
· simp only [hk, h, coeff_C_zero, coeff_C_ne_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero hk, RingHom.map_zero, Commute.zero_left]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_C' Polynomial.eval₂_mul_C'
theorem eval₂_list_prod_noncomm (ps : List R[X])
(hf : ∀ p ∈ ps, ∀ (k), Commute (f <| coeff p k) x) :
eval₂ f x ps.prod = (ps.map (Polynomial.eval₂ f x)).prod := by
induction' ps using List.reverseRecOn with ps p ihp
· simp
· simp only [List.forall_mem_append, List.forall_mem_singleton] at hf
simp [eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ hf.2, ihp hf.1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_prod_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_list_prod_noncomm
@[simps]
def eval₂RingHom' (f : R →+* S) (x : S) (hf : ∀ a, Commute (f a) x) : R[X] →+* S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_mul' _p q := eval₂_mul_noncomm f x fun k => hf <| coeff q k
map_one' := eval₂_one _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_ring_hom' Polynomial.eval₂RingHom'
end
section Eval₂
section
variable [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
theorem eval₂_eq_sum_range :
p.eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (p.natDegree + 1), f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i :=
_root_.trans (congr_arg _ p.as_sum_range)
(_root_.trans (eval₂_finset_sum f _ _ x) (congr_arg _ (by simp)))
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range
theorem eval₂_eq_sum_range' (f : R →+* S) {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : p.natDegree < n) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x p = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f (p.coeff i) * x ^ i := by
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, p.sum_over_range' _ _ hn]
intro i
rw [f.map_zero, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range' Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum_range'
end
section
variable [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul : (p * q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x * q.eval₂ f x :=
eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun _k => Commute.all _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul Polynomial.eval₂_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 270 | 272 | theorem eval₂_mul_eq_zero_of_left (q : R[X]) (hp : p.eval₂ f x = 0) : (p * q).eval₂ f x = 0 := by |
rw [eval₂_mul f x]
exact mul_eq_zero_of_left hp (q.eval₂ f x)
|
import Batteries.Classes.SatisfiesM
namespace Array
theorem SatisfiesM_foldlM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat → β → Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive 0 init) {f : β → α → m β}
(hf : ∀ i : Fin as.size, ∀ b, motive i.1 b → SatisfiesM (motive (i.1 + 1)) (f b as[i])) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (as.foldlM f init) := by
let rec go {i j b} (h₁ : j ≤ as.size) (h₂ : as.size ≤ i + j) (H : motive j b) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (foldlM.loop f as as.size (Nat.le_refl _) i j b) := by
unfold foldlM.loop; split
· next hj =>
split
· cases Nat.not_le_of_gt (by simp [hj]) h₂
· exact (hf ⟨j, hj⟩ b H).bind fun _ => go hj (by rwa [Nat.succ_add] at h₂)
· next hj => exact Nat.le_antisymm h₁ (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ .pure H
simp [foldlM]; exact go (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.le_refl _) h0
theorem SatisfiesM_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(motive : Nat → Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, motive i.1 → SatisfiesM (p i · ∧ motive (i + 1)) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => motive as.size ∧ ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) := by
rw [mapM_eq_foldlM]
refine SatisfiesM_foldlM (m := m) (β := Array β)
(motive := fun i arr => motive i ∧ arr.size = i ∧ ∀ i h2, p i (arr[i.1]'h2)) ?z ?s
|>.imp fun ⟨h₁, eq, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, eq, fun _ _ => h₂ ..⟩
· case z => exact ⟨h0, rfl, nofun⟩
· case s =>
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ arr ⟨ih₁, eq, ih₂⟩
refine (hs _ ih₁).map fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, by simp [eq], fun j hj => ?_⟩
simp [get_push] at hj ⊢; split; {apply ih₂}
cases j; cases (Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ hj).resolve_left ‹_›; cases eq; exact h₁
theorem SatisfiesM_mapM' [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, SatisfiesM (p i) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) :=
(SatisfiesM_mapM _ _ (fun _ => True) trivial _ (fun _ h => (hs _).imp (⟨·, h⟩))).imp (·.2)
theorem size_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) :
SatisfiesM (fun arr => arr.size = as.size) (Array.mapM f as) :=
(SatisfiesM_mapM' _ _ (fun _ _ => True) (fun _ => .trivial)).imp (·.1)
theorem SatisfiesM_anyM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop)
(hstart : start ≤ min stop as.size) (tru : Prop) (fal : Nat → Prop) (h0 : fal start)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, i.1 < stop → fal i.1 →
SatisfiesM (bif · then tru else fal (i + 1)) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => bif res then tru else fal (min stop as.size))
(anyM p as start stop) := by
let rec go {stop j} (hj' : j ≤ stop) (hstop : stop ≤ as.size) (h0 : fal j)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, i.1 < stop → fal i.1 →
SatisfiesM (bif · then tru else fal (i + 1)) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => bif res then tru else fal stop)
(anyM.loop p as stop hstop j) := by
unfold anyM.loop; split
· next hj =>
exact (hp ⟨j, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj hstop⟩ hj h0).bind fun
| true, h => .pure h
| false, h => go hj hstop h hp
· next hj => exact .pure <| Nat.le_antisymm hj' (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ h0
termination_by stop - j
simp only [Array.anyM_eq_anyM_loop]
exact go hstart _ h0 fun i hi => hp i <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hi <| Nat.min_le_left ..
theorem SatisfiesM_anyM_iff_exists [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) (q : Fin as.size → Prop)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 → i.1 < stop → SatisfiesM (· = true ↔ q i) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => res = true ↔ ∃ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < stop ∧ q i)
(anyM p as start stop) := by
cases Nat.le_total start (min stop as.size) with
| inl hstart =>
refine (SatisfiesM_anyM _ _ _ _ hstart
(fal := fun j => start ≤ j ∧ ¬ ∃ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < j ∧ q i)
(tru := ∃ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < stop ∧ q i) ?_ ?_).imp ?_
· exact ⟨Nat.le_refl _, fun ⟨i, h₁, h₂, _⟩ => (Nat.not_le_of_gt h₂ h₁).elim⟩
· refine fun i h₂ ⟨h₁, h₃⟩ => (hp _ h₁ h₂).imp fun hq => ?_
unfold cond; split <;> simp at hq
· exact ⟨_, h₁, h₂, hq⟩
· refine ⟨Nat.le_succ_of_le h₁, h₃.imp fun ⟨j, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ => ⟨j, h₃, ?_, h₅⟩⟩
refine Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h₄) fun e => hq (Fin.eq_of_val_eq e ▸ h₅)
· intro
| true, h => simp only [true_iff]; exact h
| false, h =>
simp only [false_iff]
exact h.2.imp fun ⟨j, h₁, h₂, hq⟩ => ⟨j, h₁, Nat.lt_min.2 ⟨h₂, j.2⟩, hq⟩
| inr hstart =>
rw [anyM_stop_le_start (h := hstart)]
refine .pure ?_; simp; intro j h₁ h₂
cases Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_trans hstart h₁) (Nat.lt_min.2 ⟨h₂, j.2⟩)
theorem SatisfiesM_foldrM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat → β → Prop)
{init : β} (h0 : motive as.size init) {f : α → β → m β}
(hf : ∀ i : Fin as.size, ∀ b, motive (i.1 + 1) b → SatisfiesM (motive i.1) (f as[i] b)) :
SatisfiesM (motive 0) (as.foldrM f init) := by
let rec go {i b} (hi : i ≤ as.size) (H : motive i b) :
SatisfiesM (motive 0) (foldrM.fold f as 0 i hi b) := by
unfold foldrM.fold; simp; split
· next hi => exact .pure (hi ▸ H)
· next hi =>
split; {simp at hi}
· next i hi' =>
exact (hf ⟨i, hi'⟩ b H).bind fun _ => go _
simp [foldrM]; split; {exact go _ h0}
· next h => exact .pure (Nat.eq_zero_of_not_pos h ▸ h0)
theorem SatisfiesM_mapIdxM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : Fin as.size → α → m β)
(motive : Nat → Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, motive i.1 → SatisfiesM (p i · ∧ motive (i + 1)) (f i as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => motive as.size ∧ ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapIdxM as f) := by
let rec go {bs i j h} (h₁ : j = bs.size) (h₂ : ∀ i h h', p ⟨i, h⟩ bs[i]) (hm : motive j) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => motive as.size ∧ ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapIdxM.map as f i j h bs) := by
induction i generalizing j bs with simp [mapIdxM.map]
| zero =>
have := (Nat.zero_add _).symm.trans h
exact .pure ⟨this ▸ hm, h₁ ▸ this, fun _ _ => h₂ ..⟩
| succ i ih =>
refine (hs _ (by exact hm)).bind fun b hb => ih (by simp [h₁]) (fun i hi hi' => ?_) hb.2
simp at hi'; simp [get_push]; split
· next h => exact h₂ _ _ h
· next h => cases h₁.symm ▸ (Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ hi').resolve_left h; exact hb.1
simp [mapIdxM]; exact go rfl nofun h0
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Array/Monadic.lean | 150 | 154 | theorem size_modifyM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (f : α → m α) :
SatisfiesM (·.size = a.size) (a.modifyM i f) := by |
unfold modifyM; split
· exact .bind_pre <| .of_true fun _ => .pure <| by simp only [size_set]
· exact .pure rfl
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.KanExtension
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Opens
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Unique
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import topology.sheaves.presheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5dc6092d09e5e489106865241986f7f2ad28d4c8"
set_option autoImplicit true
universe w v u
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Opposite
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
namespace TopCat
-- Porting note(#5171): was @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def Presheaf (X : TopCat.{w}) : Type max u v w :=
(Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf TopCat.Presheaf
instance (X : TopCat.{w}) : Category (Presheaf.{w, v, u} C X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Category ((Opens X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C : Type max u v w))
variable {C}
namespace Presheaf
@[simp] theorem comp_app {P Q R : Presheaf C X} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) :
(f ≫ g).app U = f.app U ≫ g.app U := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): added an `ext` lemma,
-- since `NatTrans.ext` can not see through the definition of `Presheaf`.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5229
@[ext]
lemma ext {P Q : Presheaf C X} {f g : P ⟶ Q} (w : ∀ U : Opens X, f.app (op U) = g.app (op U)) :
f = g := by
apply NatTrans.ext
ext U
induction U with | _ U => ?_
apply w
attribute [local instance] CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort
CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
macro "sheaf_restrict" : attr =>
`(attr|aesop safe 50 apply (rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
attribute [sheaf_restrict] bot_le le_top le_refl inf_le_left inf_le_right
le_sup_left le_sup_right
macro (name := restrict_tac) "restrict_tac" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic| first | assumption |
aesop $c*
(config := { terminal := true
assumptionTransparency := .reducible
enableSimp := false })
(rule_sets := [-default, -builtin, $(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
macro (name := restrict_tac?) "restrict_tac?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop? $c*
(config := { terminal := true
assumptionTransparency := .reducible
enableSimp := false
maxRuleApplications := 300 })
(rule_sets := [-default, -builtin, $(Lean.mkIdent `Restrict):ident]))
attribute[aesop 10% (rule_sets := [Restrict])] le_trans
attribute[aesop safe destruct (rule_sets := [Restrict])] Eq.trans_le
attribute[aesop safe -50 (rule_sets := [Restrict])] Aesop.BuiltinRules.assumption
example {X} [CompleteLattice X] (v : Nat → X) (w x y z : X) (e : v 0 = v 1) (_ : v 1 = v 2)
(h₀ : v 1 ≤ x) (_ : x ≤ z ⊓ w) (h₂ : x ≤ y ⊓ z) : v 0 ≤ y := by
restrict_tac
def restrict {X : TopCat} {C : Type*} [Category C] [ConcreteCategory C] {F : X.Presheaf C}
{V : Opens X} (x : F.obj (op V)) {U : Opens X} (h : U ⟶ V) : F.obj (op U) :=
F.map h.op x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.restrict TopCat.Presheaf.restrict
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] infixl:80 " |_ₕ " => TopCat.Presheaf.restrict
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] notation:80 x " |_ₗ " U " ⟪" e "⟫ " =>
@TopCat.Presheaf.restrict _ _ _ _ _ _ x U (@homOfLE (Opens _) _ U _ e)
open AlgebraicGeometry
abbrev restrictOpen {X : TopCat} {C : Type*} [Category C] [ConcreteCategory C] {F : X.Presheaf C}
{V : Opens X} (x : F.obj (op V)) (U : Opens X)
(e : U ≤ V := by restrict_tac) :
F.obj (op U) :=
x |_ₗ U ⟪e⟫
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.restrict_open TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpen
scoped[AlgebraicGeometry] infixl:80 " |_ " => TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpen
-- Porting note: linter tells this lemma is no going to be picked up by the simplifier, hence
-- `@[simp]` is removed
theorem restrict_restrict {X : TopCat} {C : Type*} [Category C] [ConcreteCategory C]
{F : X.Presheaf C} {U V W : Opens X} (e₁ : U ≤ V) (e₂ : V ≤ W) (x : F.obj (op W)) :
x |_ V |_ U = x |_ U := by
delta restrictOpen restrict
rw [← comp_apply, ← Functor.map_comp]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.restrict_restrict TopCat.Presheaf.restrict_restrict
-- Porting note: linter tells this lemma is no going to be picked up by the simplifier, hence
-- `@[simp]` is removed
theorem map_restrict {X : TopCat} {C : Type*} [Category C] [ConcreteCategory C]
{F G : X.Presheaf C} (e : F ⟶ G) {U V : Opens X} (h : U ≤ V) (x : F.obj (op V)) :
e.app _ (x |_ U) = e.app _ x |_ U := by
delta restrictOpen restrict
rw [← comp_apply, NatTrans.naturality, comp_apply]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.map_restrict TopCat.Presheaf.map_restrict
def pushforwardObj {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) : Y.Presheaf C :=
(Opens.map f).op ⋙ ℱ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_obj TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj
infixl:80 " _* " => pushforwardObj
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardObj_obj {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ) :
(f _* ℱ).obj U = ℱ.obj ((Opens.map f).op.obj U) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_obj_obj TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj_obj
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardObj_map {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) {U V : (Opens Y)ᵒᵖ}
(i : U ⟶ V) : (f _* ℱ).map i = ℱ.map ((Opens.map f).op.map i) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_obj_map TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj_map
def pushforwardEq {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
f _* ℱ ≅ g _* ℱ :=
isoWhiskerRight (NatIso.op (Opens.mapIso f g h).symm) ℱ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_eq TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardEq
theorem pushforward_eq' {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
f _* ℱ = g _* ℱ := by rw [h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_eq' TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_eq'
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardEq_hom_app {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y}
(h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(pushforwardEq h ℱ).hom.app U =
ℱ.map (by dsimp [Functor.op]; apply Quiver.Hom.op; apply eqToHom; rw [h]) := by
simp [pushforwardEq]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_eq_hom_app TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardEq_hom_app
theorem pushforward_eq'_hom_app {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C)
(U) : NatTrans.app (eqToHom (pushforward_eq' h ℱ)) U = ℱ.map (eqToHom (by rw [h])) := by
rw [eqToHom_app, eqToHom_map]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_eq'_hom_app TopCat.Presheaf.pushforward_eq'_hom_app
-- Porting note: This lemma is promoted to a higher priority to short circuit the simplifier
@[simp (high)]
theorem pushforwardEq_rfl {X Y : TopCat.{w}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) (U) :
(pushforwardEq (rfl : f = f) ℱ).hom.app (op U) = 𝟙 _ := by
dsimp [pushforwardEq]
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_eq_rfl TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardEq_rfl
theorem pushforwardEq_eq {X Y : TopCat.{w}} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (h₁ h₂ : f = g) (ℱ : X.Presheaf C) :
ℱ.pushforwardEq h₁ = ℱ.pushforwardEq h₂ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward_eq_eq TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardEq_eq
namespace Pushforward
variable {X : TopCat.{w}} (ℱ : X.Presheaf C)
def id : 𝟙 X _* ℱ ≅ ℱ :=
isoWhiskerRight (NatIso.op (Opens.mapId X).symm) ℱ ≪≫ Functor.leftUnitor _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward.id TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.id
theorem id_eq : 𝟙 X _* ℱ = ℱ := by
unfold pushforwardObj
rw [Opens.map_id_eq]
erw [Functor.id_comp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward.id_eq TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.id_eq
-- Porting note: This lemma is promoted to a higher priority to short circuit the simplifier
@[simp (high)]
theorem id_hom_app' (U) (p) : (id ℱ).hom.app (op ⟨U, p⟩) = ℱ.map (𝟙 (op ⟨U, p⟩)) := by
dsimp [id]
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward.id_hom_app' TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.id_hom_app'
-- Porting note:
-- the proof below could be `by aesop_cat` if
-- https://github.com/JLimperg/aesop/issues/59
-- can be resolved, and we add:
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opposite
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opens
@[simp]
theorem id_hom_app (U) : (id ℱ).hom.app U = ℱ.map (eqToHom (Opens.op_map_id_obj U)) := by
-- was `tidy`, see porting note above.
induction U
apply id_hom_app'
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.presheaf.pushforward.id_hom_app TopCat.Presheaf.Pushforward.id_hom_app
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/Presheaf.lean | 273 | 275 | theorem id_inv_app' (U) (p) : (id ℱ).inv.app (op ⟨U, p⟩) = ℱ.map (𝟙 (op ⟨U, p⟩)) := by |
dsimp [id]
simp [CategoryStruct.comp]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Projective
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.ExtraDegeneracy
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Ext
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Rep
#align_import representation_theory.group_cohomology.resolution from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cec81510e48e579bde6acd8568c06a87af045b63"
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {k G : Type u} [CommRing k] {n : ℕ}
open CategoryTheory
local notation "Gⁿ" => Fin n → G
set_option quotPrecheck false
local notation "Gⁿ⁺¹" => Fin (n + 1) → G
namespace groupCohomology.resolution
open Finsupp hiding lift
open MonoidalCategory
open Fin (partialProd)
section Basis
variable (k G n) [Group G]
section Action
open Action
def actionDiagonalSucc (G : Type u) [Group G] :
∀ n : ℕ, diagonal G (n + 1) ≅ leftRegular G ⊗ Action.mk (Fin n → G) 1
| 0 =>
diagonalOneIsoLeftRegular G ≪≫
(ρ_ _).symm ≪≫ tensorIso (Iso.refl _) (tensorUnitIso (Equiv.equivOfUnique PUnit _).toIso)
| n + 1 =>
diagonalSucc _ _ ≪≫
tensorIso (Iso.refl _) (actionDiagonalSucc G n) ≪≫
leftRegularTensorIso _ _ ≪≫
tensorIso (Iso.refl _)
(mkIso (Equiv.piFinSuccAbove (fun _ => G) 0).symm.toIso fun _ => rfl)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align group_cohomology.resolution.Action_diagonal_succ groupCohomology.resolution.actionDiagonalSucc
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/GroupCohomology/Resolution.lean | 108 | 124 | theorem actionDiagonalSucc_hom_apply {G : Type u} [Group G] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → G) :
(actionDiagonalSucc G n).hom.hom f = (f 0, fun i => (f (Fin.castSucc i))⁻¹ * f i.succ) := by |
induction' n with n hn
· exact Prod.ext rfl (funext fun x => Fin.elim0 x)
· refine Prod.ext rfl (funext fun x => ?_)
/- Porting note (#11039): broken proof was
· dsimp only [actionDiagonalSucc]
simp only [Iso.trans_hom, comp_hom, types_comp_apply, diagonalSucc_hom_hom,
leftRegularTensorIso_hom_hom, tensorIso_hom, mkIso_hom_hom, Equiv.toIso_hom,
Action.tensorHom, Equiv.piFinSuccAbove_symm_apply, tensor_apply, types_id_apply,
tensor_rho, MonoidHom.one_apply, End.one_def, hn fun j : Fin (n + 1) => f j.succ,
Fin.insertNth_zero']
refine' Fin.cases (Fin.cons_zero _ _) (fun i => _) x
· simp only [Fin.cons_succ, mul_left_inj, inv_inj, Fin.castSucc_fin_succ] -/
dsimp [actionDiagonalSucc]
erw [hn (fun (j : Fin (n + 1)) => f j.succ)]
exact Fin.cases rfl (fun i => rfl) x
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DFinsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
#align_import linear_algebra.finsupp_vector_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59628387770d82eb6f6dd7b7107308aa2509ec95"
noncomputable section
open Set LinearMap Submodule
open scoped Cardinal
universe u v w
namespace Finsupp
section Ring
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {ι : Type*}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FinsuppVectorSpace.lean | 34 | 51 | theorem linearIndependent_single {φ : ι → Type*} {f : ∀ ι, φ ι → M}
(hf : ∀ i, LinearIndependent R (f i)) :
LinearIndependent R fun ix : Σi, φ i => single ix.1 (f ix.1 ix.2) := by |
apply @linearIndependent_iUnion_finite R _ _ _ _ ι φ fun i x => single i (f i x)
· intro i
have h_disjoint : Disjoint (span R (range (f i))) (ker (lsingle i)) := by
rw [ker_lsingle]
exact disjoint_bot_right
apply (hf i).map h_disjoint
· intro i t _ hit
refine (disjoint_lsingle_lsingle {i} t (disjoint_singleton_left.2 hit)).mono ?_ ?_
· rw [span_le]
simp only [iSup_singleton]
rw [range_coe]
apply range_comp_subset_range _ (lsingle i)
· refine iSup₂_mono fun i hi => ?_
rw [span_le, range_coe]
apply range_comp_subset_range _ (lsingle i)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.StrictConvexSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqOfIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
#align_import analysis.convex.integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set E} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} {g : E → ℝ} {C : ℝ}
theorem Convex.integral_mem [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hsc : IsClosed s)
(hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : (∫ x, f x ∂μ) ∈ s := by
borelize E
rcases hfi.aestronglyMeasurable with ⟨g, hgm, hfg⟩
haveI : SeparableSpace (range g ∩ s : Set E) :=
(hgm.isSeparable_range.mono inter_subset_left).separableSpace
obtain ⟨y₀, h₀⟩ : (range g ∩ s).Nonempty := by
rcases (hf.and hfg).exists with ⟨x₀, h₀⟩
exact ⟨f x₀, by simp only [h₀.2, mem_range_self], h₀.1⟩
rw [integral_congr_ae hfg]; rw [integrable_congr hfg] at hfi
have hg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x ∈ closure (range g ∩ s) := by
filter_upwards [hfg.rw (fun _ y => y ∈ s) hf] with x hx
apply subset_closure
exact ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩
set G : ℕ → SimpleFunc α E := SimpleFunc.approxOn _ hgm.measurable (range g ∩ s) y₀ h₀
have : Tendsto (fun n => (G n).integral μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫ x, g x ∂μ) :=
tendsto_integral_approxOn_of_measurable hfi _ hg _ (integrable_const _)
refine hsc.mem_of_tendsto this (eventually_of_forall fun n => hs.sum_mem ?_ ?_ ?_)
· exact fun _ _ => ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
· rw [← ENNReal.toReal_sum, (G n).sum_range_measure_preimage_singleton, measure_univ,
ENNReal.one_toReal]
exact fun _ _ => measure_ne_top _ _
· simp only [SimpleFunc.mem_range, forall_mem_range]
intro x
apply (range g).inter_subset_right
exact SimpleFunc.approxOn_mem hgm.measurable h₀ _ _
#align convex.integral_mem Convex.integral_mem
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Integral.lean | 87 | 90 | theorem Convex.average_mem [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [NeZero μ] (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hsc : IsClosed s)
(hfs : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ s) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : (⨍ x, f x ∂μ) ∈ s := by |
refine hs.integral_mem hsc (ae_mono' ?_ hfs) hfi.to_average
exact AbsolutelyContinuous.smul (refl _) _
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.EqualizerSheafCondition
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
def IsSheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike in
def IsSeparated (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) [ConcreteCategory A] : Prop :=
∀ (X : C) (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ J X) (x y : P.obj (op X)),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : S f), P.map f.op x = P.map f.op y) → x = y
section LimitSheafCondition
open Presieve Presieve.FamilyOfElements Limits
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) {X : C} (S : Sieve X) (R : Presieve X) (E : Aᵒᵖ)
@[simps]
def conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily :
(S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P).cones.obj E ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) (S : Presieve X) // x.SieveCompatible } where
toFun π :=
⟨fun Y f h => π.app (op ⟨Over.mk f, h⟩), fun X Y f g hf => by
apply (id_comp _).symm.trans
dsimp
exact π.naturality (Quiver.Hom.op (Over.homMk _ (by rfl)))⟩
invFun x :=
{ app := fun f => x.1 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2
naturality := fun f f' g => by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (x.2 f.unop.1.hom g.unop.left f.unop.2)
dsimp
rw [id_comp]
convert rfl
rw [Over.w] }
left_inv π := rfl
right_inv x := rfl
#align category_theory.presheaf.cones_equiv_sieve_compatible_family CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily
-- These lemmas have always been bad (#7657), but leanprover/lean4#2644 made `simp` start noticing
attribute [nolint simpNF] CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily_apply_coe
CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily_symm_apply_app
variable {P S E} {x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows} (hx : SieveCompatible x)
@[simp]
def _root_.CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone :
Cone (S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P) where
pt := E.unop
π := (conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S E).invFun ⟨x, hx⟩
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_compatible.cone CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone
def homEquivAmalgamation :
(hx.cone ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op) ≃ { t // x.IsAmalgamation t } where
toFun l := ⟨l.hom, fun _ f hf => l.w (op ⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩)⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, fun f => t.2 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align category_theory.presheaf.hom_equiv_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presheaf.homEquivAmalgamation
variable (P S)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheaf.lean | 147 | 162 | theorem isLimit_iff_isSheafFor :
Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSheafFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows := by |
dsimp [IsSheafFor]; simp_rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
rw [((Cone.isLimitEquivIsTerminal _).trans (isTerminalEquivUnique _ _)).nonempty_congr]
rw [Classical.nonempty_pi]; constructor
· intro hu E x hx
specialize hu hx.cone
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation hx).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr] at hu
exact (unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique _).1 hu
· rintro h ⟨E, π⟩
let eqv := conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S (op E)
rw [← eqv.left_inv π]
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation (eqv π).2).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr]
rw [unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique]
exact h _ _ (eqv π).2
|
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
#align_import computability.reduce from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d13b3a4a392ea7273dfa4727dbd1892e26cfd518"
universe u v w
open Function
def ManyOneReducible {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) :=
∃ f, Computable f ∧ ∀ a, p a ↔ q (f a)
#align many_one_reducible ManyOneReducible
@[inherit_doc ManyOneReducible]
infixl:1000 " ≤₀ " => ManyOneReducible
theorem ManyOneReducible.mk {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} (q : β → Prop)
(h : Computable f) : (fun a => q (f a)) ≤₀ q :=
⟨f, h, fun _ => Iff.rfl⟩
#align many_one_reducible.mk ManyOneReducible.mk
@[refl]
theorem manyOneReducible_refl {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) : p ≤₀ p :=
⟨id, Computable.id, by simp⟩
#align many_one_reducible_refl manyOneReducible_refl
@[trans]
theorem ManyOneReducible.trans {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ]
{p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} : p ≤₀ q → q ≤₀ r → p ≤₀ r
| ⟨f, c₁, h₁⟩, ⟨g, c₂, h₂⟩ =>
⟨g ∘ f, c₂.comp c₁,
fun a => ⟨fun h => by erw [← h₂, ← h₁]; assumption, fun h => by rwa [h₁, h₂]⟩⟩
#align many_one_reducible.trans ManyOneReducible.trans
theorem reflexive_manyOneReducible {α} [Primcodable α] : Reflexive (@ManyOneReducible α α _ _) :=
manyOneReducible_refl
#align reflexive_many_one_reducible reflexive_manyOneReducible
theorem transitive_manyOneReducible {α} [Primcodable α] : Transitive (@ManyOneReducible α α _ _) :=
fun _ _ _ => ManyOneReducible.trans
#align transitive_many_one_reducible transitive_manyOneReducible
def OneOneReducible {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] (p : α → Prop) (q : β → Prop) :=
∃ f, Computable f ∧ Injective f ∧ ∀ a, p a ↔ q (f a)
#align one_one_reducible OneOneReducible
@[inherit_doc OneOneReducible]
infixl:1000 " ≤₁ " => OneOneReducible
theorem OneOneReducible.mk {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {f : α → β} (q : β → Prop)
(h : Computable f) (i : Injective f) : (fun a => q (f a)) ≤₁ q :=
⟨f, h, i, fun _ => Iff.rfl⟩
#align one_one_reducible.mk OneOneReducible.mk
@[refl]
theorem oneOneReducible_refl {α} [Primcodable α] (p : α → Prop) : p ≤₁ p :=
⟨id, Computable.id, injective_id, by simp⟩
#align one_one_reducible_refl oneOneReducible_refl
@[trans]
theorem OneOneReducible.trans {α β γ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] [Primcodable γ] {p : α → Prop}
{q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} : p ≤₁ q → q ≤₁ r → p ≤₁ r
| ⟨f, c₁, i₁, h₁⟩, ⟨g, c₂, i₂, h₂⟩ =>
⟨g ∘ f, c₂.comp c₁, i₂.comp i₁, fun a =>
⟨fun h => by erw [← h₂, ← h₁]; assumption, fun h => by rwa [h₁, h₂]⟩⟩
#align one_one_reducible.trans OneOneReducible.trans
theorem OneOneReducible.to_many_one {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {p : α → Prop}
{q : β → Prop} : p ≤₁ q → p ≤₀ q
| ⟨f, c, _, h⟩ => ⟨f, c, h⟩
#align one_one_reducible.to_many_one OneOneReducible.to_many_one
theorem OneOneReducible.of_equiv {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {e : α ≃ β} (q : β → Prop)
(h : Computable e) : (q ∘ e) ≤₁ q :=
OneOneReducible.mk _ h e.injective
#align one_one_reducible.of_equiv OneOneReducible.of_equiv
| Mathlib/Computability/Reduce.lean | 111 | 113 | theorem OneOneReducible.of_equiv_symm {α β} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable β] {e : α ≃ β}
(q : β → Prop) (h : Computable e.symm) : q ≤₁ (q ∘ e) := by |
convert OneOneReducible.of_equiv _ h; funext; simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Endomorphism
#align_import category_theory.conj from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
def homCongr {X Y X₁ Y₁ : C} (α : X ≅ X₁) (β : Y ≅ Y₁) : (X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) where
toFun f := α.inv ≫ f ≫ β.hom
invFun f := α.hom ≫ f ≫ β.inv
left_inv f :=
show α.hom ≫ (α.inv ≫ f ≫ β.hom) ≫ β.inv = f by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, β.hom_inv_id, α.hom_inv_id_assoc, Category.comp_id]
right_inv f :=
show α.inv ≫ (α.hom ≫ f ≫ β.inv) ≫ β.hom = f by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, β.inv_hom_id, α.inv_hom_id_assoc, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr
-- @[simp, nolint simpNF] Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
@[simp]
theorem homCongr_apply {X Y X₁ Y₁ : C} (α : X ≅ X₁) (β : Y ≅ Y₁) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
α.homCongr β f = α.inv ≫ f ≫ β.hom := by
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr_apply CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr_apply
theorem homCongr_comp {X Y Z X₁ Y₁ Z₁ : C} (α : X ≅ X₁) (β : Y ≅ Y₁) (γ : Z ≅ Z₁) (f : X ⟶ Y)
(g : Y ⟶ Z) : α.homCongr γ (f ≫ g) = α.homCongr β f ≫ β.homCongr γ g := by simp
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr_comp CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr_comp
theorem homCongr_refl {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (Iso.refl X).homCongr (Iso.refl Y) f = f := by simp
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr_refl CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr_refl
theorem homCongr_trans {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ X₃ Y₃ : C} (α₁ : X₁ ≅ X₂) (β₁ : Y₁ ≅ Y₂) (α₂ : X₂ ≅ X₃)
(β₂ : Y₂ ≅ Y₃) (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) :
(α₁ ≪≫ α₂).homCongr (β₁ ≪≫ β₂) f = (α₁.homCongr β₁).trans (α₂.homCongr β₂) f := by simp
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr_trans CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr_trans
@[simp]
theorem homCongr_symm {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (α : X₁ ≅ X₂) (β : Y₁ ≅ Y₂) :
(α.homCongr β).symm = α.symm.homCongr β.symm :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.hom_congr_symm CategoryTheory.Iso.homCongr_symm
def isoCongr {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ≅ X₂) (g : Y₁ ≅ Y₂) : (X₁ ≅ Y₁) ≃ (X₂ ≅ Y₂) where
toFun h := f.symm.trans <| h.trans <| g
invFun h := f.trans <| h.trans <| g.symm
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
def isoCongrLeft {X₁ X₂ Y : C} (f : X₁ ≅ X₂) : (X₁ ≅ Y) ≃ (X₂ ≅ Y) :=
isoCongr f (Iso.refl _)
def isoCongrRight {X Y₁ Y₂ : C} (g : Y₁ ≅ Y₂) : (X ≅ Y₁) ≃ (X ≅ Y₂) :=
isoCongr (Iso.refl _) g
variable {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y)
def conj : End X ≃* End Y :=
{ homCongr α α with map_mul' := fun f g => homCongr_comp α α α g f }
#align category_theory.iso.conj CategoryTheory.Iso.conj
theorem conj_apply (f : End X) : α.conj f = α.inv ≫ f ≫ α.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.conj_apply CategoryTheory.Iso.conj_apply
@[simp]
theorem conj_comp (f g : End X) : α.conj (f ≫ g) = α.conj f ≫ α.conj g :=
α.conj.map_mul g f
#align category_theory.iso.conj_comp CategoryTheory.Iso.conj_comp
@[simp]
theorem conj_id : α.conj (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 Y :=
α.conj.map_one
#align category_theory.iso.conj_id CategoryTheory.Iso.conj_id
@[simp]
theorem refl_conj (f : End X) : (Iso.refl X).conj f = f := by
rw [conj_apply, Iso.refl_inv, Iso.refl_hom, Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.iso.refl_conj CategoryTheory.Iso.refl_conj
@[simp]
theorem trans_conj {Z : C} (β : Y ≅ Z) (f : End X) : (α ≪≫ β).conj f = β.conj (α.conj f) :=
homCongr_trans α α β β f
#align category_theory.iso.trans_conj CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_conj
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Conj.lean | 124 | 125 | theorem symm_self_conj (f : End X) : α.symm.conj (α.conj f) = f := by |
rw [← trans_conj, α.self_symm_id, refl_conj]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.circulant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
variable {α β m n R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open Function
open Matrix
def circulant [Sub n] (v : n → α) : Matrix n n α :=
of fun i j => v (i - j)
#align matrix.circulant Matrix.circulant
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `circulant`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem circulant_apply [Sub n] (v : n → α) (i j) : circulant v i j = v (i - j) := rfl
#align matrix.circulant_apply Matrix.circulant_apply
theorem circulant_col_zero_eq [AddGroup n] (v : n → α) (i : n) : circulant v i 0 = v i :=
congr_arg v (sub_zero _)
#align matrix.circulant_col_zero_eq Matrix.circulant_col_zero_eq
theorem circulant_injective [AddGroup n] : Injective (circulant : (n → α) → Matrix n n α) := by
intro v w h
ext k
rw [← circulant_col_zero_eq v, ← circulant_col_zero_eq w, h]
#align matrix.circulant_injective Matrix.circulant_injective
theorem Fin.circulant_injective : ∀ n, Injective fun v : Fin n → α => circulant v
| 0 => by simp [Injective]
| n + 1 => Matrix.circulant_injective
#align matrix.fin.circulant_injective Matrix.Fin.circulant_injective
@[simp]
theorem circulant_inj [AddGroup n] {v w : n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
circulant_injective.eq_iff
#align matrix.circulant_inj Matrix.circulant_inj
@[simp]
theorem Fin.circulant_inj {n} {v w : Fin n → α} : circulant v = circulant w ↔ v = w :=
(Fin.circulant_injective n).eq_iff
#align matrix.fin.circulant_inj Matrix.Fin.circulant_inj
theorem transpose_circulant [AddGroup n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᵀ = circulant fun i => v (-i) := by ext; simp
#align matrix.transpose_circulant Matrix.transpose_circulant
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Circulant.lean | 85 | 86 | theorem conjTranspose_circulant [Star α] [AddGroup n] (v : n → α) :
(circulant v)ᴴ = circulant (star fun i => v (-i)) := by | ext; simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.TrailingDegree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
#align_import data.polynomial.reverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"44de64f183393284a16016dfb2a48ac97382f2bd"
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
def revAtFun (N i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun Polynomial.revAtFun
theorem revAtFun_invol {N i : ℕ} : revAtFun N (revAtFun N i) = i := by
unfold revAtFun
split_ifs with h j
· exact tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h
· exfalso
apply j
exact Nat.sub_le N i
· rfl
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_invol Polynomial.revAtFun_invol
theorem revAtFun_inj {N : ℕ} : Function.Injective (revAtFun N) := by
intro a b hab
rw [← @revAtFun_invol N a, hab, revAtFun_invol]
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_inj Polynomial.revAtFun_inj
def revAt (N : ℕ) : Function.Embedding ℕ ℕ where
toFun i := ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
inj' := revAtFun_inj
#align polynomial.rev_at Polynomial.revAt
@[simp]
theorem revAtFun_eq (N i : ℕ) : revAtFun N i = revAt N i :=
rfl
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_eq Polynomial.revAtFun_eq
@[simp]
theorem revAt_invol {N i : ℕ} : (revAt N) (revAt N i) = i :=
revAtFun_invol
#align polynomial.rev_at_invol Polynomial.revAt_invol
@[simp]
theorem revAt_le {N i : ℕ} (H : i ≤ N) : revAt N i = N - i :=
if_pos H
#align polynomial.rev_at_le Polynomial.revAt_le
lemma revAt_eq_self_of_lt {N i : ℕ} (h : N < i) : revAt N i = i := by simp [revAt, Nat.not_le.mpr h]
theorem revAt_add {N O n o : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) (ho : o ≤ O) :
revAt (N + O) (n + o) = revAt N n + revAt O o := by
rcases Nat.le.dest hn with ⟨n', rfl⟩
rcases Nat.le.dest ho with ⟨o', rfl⟩
repeat' rw [revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
rw [add_assoc, add_left_comm n' o, ← add_assoc, revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
repeat' rw [add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align polynomial.rev_at_add Polynomial.revAt_add
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem revAt_zero (N : ℕ) : revAt N 0 = N := by simp
#align polynomial.rev_at_zero Polynomial.revAt_zero
noncomputable def reflect (N : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f⟩
#align polynomial.reflect Polynomial.reflect
theorem reflect_support (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) :
(reflect N f).support = Finset.image (revAt N) f.support := by
rcases f with ⟨⟩
ext1
simp only [reflect, support_ofFinsupp, support_embDomain, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_image]
#align polynomial.reflect_support Polynomial.reflect_support
@[simp]
theorem coeff_reflect (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) (i : ℕ) : coeff (reflect N f) i = f.coeff (revAt N i) := by
rcases f with ⟨f⟩
simp only [reflect, coeff]
calc
Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f i = Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f (revAt N (revAt N i)) := by
rw [revAt_invol]
_ = f (revAt N i) := Finsupp.embDomain_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_reflect Polynomial.coeff_reflect
@[simp]
theorem reflect_zero {N : ℕ} : reflect N (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.reflect_zero Polynomial.reflect_zero
@[simp]
theorem reflect_eq_zero_iff {N : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : reflect N (f : R[X]) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [ofFinsupp_eq_zero, reflect, embDomain_eq_zero, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.reflect_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.reflect_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem reflect_add (f g : R[X]) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (f + g) = reflect N f + reflect N g := by
ext
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_reflect]
#align polynomial.reflect_add Polynomial.reflect_add
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C_mul (f : R[X]) (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r * f) = C r * reflect N f := by
ext
simp only [coeff_reflect, coeff_C_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.reflect_C_mul Polynomial.reflect_C_mul
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this (once `reflect_monomial` is in simp scope)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Reverse.lean | 146 | 155 | theorem reflect_C_mul_X_pow (N n : ℕ) {c : R} : reflect N (C c * X ^ n) = C c * X ^ revAt N n := by |
ext
rw [reflect_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_X_pow, coeff_reflect]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, revAt_invol, coeff_X_pow_self]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp]
intro a
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← C_1] at a
apply h
rw [← mem_support_C_mul_X_pow a, revAt_invol]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ThickenedIndicator
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Compact
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HahnBanach.SeparatingDual
#align_import measure_theory.integral.setIntegral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"24e0c85412ff6adbeca08022c25ba4876eedf37a"
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Function RCLike
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal
variable {X Y E F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X]
namespace MeasureTheory
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
{f g : X → E} {s t : Set X} {μ ν : Measure X} {l l' : Filter X}
theorem setIntegral_congr_ae₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae ((ae_restrict_iff'₀ hs).2 h)
#align measure_theory.set_integral_congr_ae₀ MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_ae₀
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_congr_ae₀ := setIntegral_congr_ae₀
theorem setIntegral_congr_ae (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 h)
#align measure_theory.set_integral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_ae
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_congr_ae := setIntegral_congr_ae
theorem setIntegral_congr₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (h : EqOn f g s) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
setIntegral_congr_ae₀ hs <| eventually_of_forall h
#align measure_theory.set_integral_congr₀ MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr₀
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_congr₀ := setIntegral_congr₀
theorem setIntegral_congr (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : EqOn f g s) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
setIntegral_congr_ae hs <| eventually_of_forall h
#align measure_theory.set_integral_congr MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_congr := setIntegral_congr
theorem setIntegral_congr_set_ae (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set hst]
#align measure_theory.set_integral_congr_set_ae MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_set_ae
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_congr_set_ae := setIntegral_congr_set_ae
theorem integral_union_ae (hst : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_union₀ hst ht, integral_add_measure hfs hft]
#align measure_theory.integral_union_ae MeasureTheory.integral_union_ae
theorem integral_union (hst : Disjoint s t) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hft : IntegrableOn f t μ) : ∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
integral_union_ae hst.aedisjoint ht.nullMeasurableSet hfs hft
#align measure_theory.integral_union MeasureTheory.integral_union
theorem integral_diff (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hts : t ⊆ s) :
∫ x in s \ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← integral_union, diff_union_of_subset hts]
exacts [disjoint_sdiff_self_left, ht, hfs.mono_set diff_subset, hfs.mono_set hts]
#align measure_theory.integral_diff MeasureTheory.integral_diff
theorem integral_inter_add_diff₀ (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in s \ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← Measure.restrict_inter_add_diff₀ s ht, integral_add_measure]
· exact Integrable.mono_measure hfs (Measure.restrict_mono inter_subset_left le_rfl)
· exact Integrable.mono_measure hfs (Measure.restrict_mono diff_subset le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.integral_inter_add_diff₀ MeasureTheory.integral_inter_add_diff₀
theorem integral_inter_add_diff (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hfs : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in s \ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_inter_add_diff₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet hfs
#align measure_theory.integral_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.integral_inter_add_diff
theorem integral_finset_biUnion {ι : Type*} (t : Finset ι) {s : ι → Set X}
(hs : ∀ i ∈ t, MeasurableSet (s i)) (h's : Set.Pairwise (↑t) (Disjoint on s))
(hf : ∀ i ∈ t, IntegrableOn f (s i) μ) :
∫ x in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f x ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ t, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ := by
induction' t using Finset.induction_on with a t hat IH hs h's
· simp
· simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Finset.forall_mem_insert, Set.pairwise_insert,
Finset.set_biUnion_insert] at hs hf h's ⊢
rw [integral_union _ _ hf.1 (integrableOn_finset_iUnion.2 hf.2)]
· rw [Finset.sum_insert hat, IH hs.2 h's.1 hf.2]
· simp only [disjoint_iUnion_right]
exact fun i hi => (h's.2 i hi (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi hat).symm).1
· exact Finset.measurableSet_biUnion _ hs.2
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_bUnion MeasureTheory.integral_finset_biUnion
theorem integral_fintype_iUnion {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {s : ι → Set X}
(hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) (h's : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hf : ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (s i) μ) : ∫ x in ⋃ i, s i, f x ∂μ = ∑ i, ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ := by
convert integral_finset_biUnion Finset.univ (fun i _ => hs i) _ fun i _ => hf i
· simp
· simp [pairwise_univ, h's]
#align measure_theory.integral_fintype_Union MeasureTheory.integral_fintype_iUnion
theorem integral_empty : ∫ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, integral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.integral_empty MeasureTheory.integral_empty
theorem integral_univ : ∫ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.integral_univ MeasureTheory.integral_univ
theorem integral_add_compl₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [
← integral_union_ae disjoint_compl_right.aedisjoint hs.compl hfi.integrableOn hfi.integrableOn,
union_compl_self, integral_univ]
#align measure_theory.integral_add_compl₀ MeasureTheory.integral_add_compl₀
theorem integral_add_compl (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
integral_add_compl₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_add_compl MeasureTheory.integral_add_compl
theorem integral_indicator (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hfi : IntegrableOn f s μ; swap
· rw [integral_undef hfi, integral_undef]
rwa [integrable_indicator_iff hs]
calc
∫ x, indicator s f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, indicator s f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, indicator s f x ∂μ :=
(integral_add_compl hs (hfi.integrable_indicator hs)).symm
_ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, 0 ∂μ :=
(congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (integral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_restrict hs))
(integral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl hs)))
_ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by simp
#align measure_theory.integral_indicator MeasureTheory.integral_indicator
theorem setIntegral_indicator (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫ x in s, t.indicator f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s ∩ t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_indicator ht, Measure.restrict_restrict ht, Set.inter_comm]
#align measure_theory.set_integral_indicator MeasureTheory.setIntegral_indicator
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_indicator := setIntegral_indicator
theorem ofReal_setIntegral_one_of_measure_ne_top {X : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace X}
{μ : Measure X} {s : Set X} (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in s, (1 : ℝ) ∂μ) = μ s :=
calc
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in s, (1 : ℝ) ∂μ) = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in s, ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ ∂μ) := by
simp only [norm_one]
_ = ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ := by
rw [ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm (integrableOn_const.2 (Or.inr hs.lt_top))]
simp only [nnnorm_one, ENNReal.coe_one]
_ = μ s := set_lintegral_one _
#align measure_theory.of_real_set_integral_one_of_measure_ne_top MeasureTheory.ofReal_setIntegral_one_of_measure_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ofReal_set_integral_one_of_measure_ne_top := ofReal_setIntegral_one_of_measure_ne_top
theorem ofReal_setIntegral_one {X : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace X} (μ : Measure X)
[IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set X) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ _ in s, (1 : ℝ) ∂μ) = μ s :=
ofReal_setIntegral_one_of_measure_ne_top (measure_ne_top μ s)
#align measure_theory.of_real_set_integral_one MeasureTheory.ofReal_setIntegral_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ofReal_set_integral_one := ofReal_setIntegral_one
theorem integral_piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hg : IntegrableOn g sᶜ μ) :
∫ x, s.piecewise f g x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in sᶜ, g x ∂μ := by
rw [← Set.indicator_add_compl_eq_piecewise,
integral_add' (hf.integrable_indicator hs) (hg.integrable_indicator hs.compl),
integral_indicator hs, integral_indicator hs.compl]
#align measure_theory.integral_piecewise MeasureTheory.integral_piecewise
theorem tendsto_setIntegral_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
{s : ι → Set X} (hsm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) (h_mono : Monotone s)
(hfi : IntegrableOn f (⋃ n, s n) μ) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x in ⋃ n, s n, f x ∂μ)) := by
have hfi' : ∫⁻ x in ⋃ n, s n, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ < ∞ := hfi.2
set S := ⋃ i, s i
have hSm : MeasurableSet S := MeasurableSet.iUnion hsm
have hsub : ∀ {i}, s i ⊆ S := @(subset_iUnion s)
rw [← withDensity_apply _ hSm] at hfi'
set ν := μ.withDensity fun x => ‖f x‖₊ with hν
refine Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.tendsto_right_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le
have : ∀ᶠ i in atTop, ν (s i) ∈ Icc (ν S - ε) (ν S + ε) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion h_mono (ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds hfi'.ne (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne')
filter_upwards [this] with i hi
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm', ← integral_diff (hsm i) hfi hsub, ← coe_nnnorm, NNReal.coe_le_coe, ←
ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
refine (ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _).trans ?_
rw [← withDensity_apply _ (hSm.diff (hsm _)), ← hν, measure_diff hsub (hsm _)]
exacts [tsub_le_iff_tsub_le.mp hi.1,
(hi.2.trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hfi', ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩).ne]
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_integral_of_monotone MeasureTheory.tendsto_setIntegral_of_monotone
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_monotone := tendsto_setIntegral_of_monotone
theorem tendsto_setIntegral_of_antitone {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
{s : ι → Set X} (hsm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) (h_anti : Antitone s)
(hfi : ∃ i, IntegrableOn f (s i) μ) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x in ⋂ n, s n, f x ∂μ)) := by
set S := ⋂ i, s i
have hSm : MeasurableSet S := MeasurableSet.iInter hsm
have hsub i : S ⊆ s i := iInter_subset _ _
set ν := μ.withDensity fun x => ‖f x‖₊ with hν
refine Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.tendsto_right_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le
rcases hfi with ⟨i₀, hi₀⟩
have νi₀ : ν (s i₀) ≠ ∞ := by
simpa [hsm i₀, ν, ENNReal.ofReal, norm_toNNReal] using hi₀.norm.lintegral_lt_top.ne
have νS : ν S ≠ ∞ := ((measure_mono (hsub i₀)).trans_lt νi₀.lt_top).ne
have : ∀ᶠ i in atTop, ν (s i) ∈ Icc (ν S - ε) (ν S + ε) := by
apply tendsto_measure_iInter hsm h_anti ⟨i₀, νi₀⟩
apply ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds νS (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne'
filter_upwards [this, Ici_mem_atTop i₀] with i hi h'i
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm, ← integral_diff hSm (hi₀.mono_set (h_anti h'i)) (hsub i),
← coe_nnnorm, NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
refine (ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _).trans ?_
rw [← withDensity_apply _ ((hsm _).diff hSm), ← hν, measure_diff (hsub i) hSm νS]
exact tsub_le_iff_left.2 hi.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_antitone := tendsto_setIntegral_of_antitone
theorem hasSum_integral_iUnion_ae {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set X}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hfi : IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
HasSum (fun n => ∫ x in s n, f x ∂μ) (∫ x in ⋃ n, s n, f x ∂μ) := by
simp only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_iUnion_ae hd hm] at hfi ⊢
exact hasSum_integral_measure hfi
#align measure_theory.has_sum_integral_Union_ae MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_iUnion_ae
theorem hasSum_integral_iUnion {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set X}
(hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i)) (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s))
(hfi : IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
HasSum (fun n => ∫ x in s n, f x ∂μ) (∫ x in ⋃ n, s n, f x ∂μ) :=
hasSum_integral_iUnion_ae (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) (hd.mono fun _ _ h => h.aedisjoint)
hfi
#align measure_theory.has_sum_integral_Union MeasureTheory.hasSum_integral_iUnion
theorem integral_iUnion {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set X} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (hfi : IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, s i) μ) :
∫ x in ⋃ n, s n, f x ∂μ = ∑' n, ∫ x in s n, f x ∂μ :=
(HasSum.tsum_eq (hasSum_integral_iUnion hm hd hfi)).symm
#align measure_theory.integral_Union MeasureTheory.integral_iUnion
theorem integral_iUnion_ae {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set X}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s))
(hfi : IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, s i) μ) : ∫ x in ⋃ n, s n, f x ∂μ = ∑' n, ∫ x in s n, f x ∂μ :=
(HasSum.tsum_eq (hasSum_integral_iUnion_ae hm hd hfi)).symm
#align measure_theory.integral_Union_ae MeasureTheory.integral_iUnion_ae
theorem setIntegral_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero (ht_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ t → f x = 0) :
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict t); swap
· rw [integral_undef]
contrapose! hf
exact hf.1
have : ∫ x in t, hf.mk f x ∂μ = 0 := by
refine integral_eq_zero_of_ae ?_
rw [EventuallyEq,
ae_restrict_iff (hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.measurableSet_eq_fun stronglyMeasurable_zero)]
filter_upwards [ae_imp_of_ae_restrict hf.ae_eq_mk, ht_eq] with x hx h'x h''x
rw [← hx h''x]
exact h'x h''x
rw [← this]
exact integral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero := setIntegral_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero
theorem setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero (ht_eq : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = 0) :
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = 0 :=
setIntegral_eq_zero_of_ae_eq_zero (eventually_of_forall ht_eq)
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero := setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero
theorem integral_union_eq_left_of_ae_aux (ht_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x = 0)
(haux : StronglyMeasurable f) (H : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) :
∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
let k := f ⁻¹' {0}
have hk : MeasurableSet k := by borelize E; exact haux.measurable (measurableSet_singleton _)
have h's : IntegrableOn f s μ := H.mono subset_union_left le_rfl
have A : ∀ u : Set X, ∫ x in u ∩ k, f x ∂μ = 0 := fun u =>
setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero fun x hx => hx.2
rw [← integral_inter_add_diff hk h's, ← integral_inter_add_diff hk H, A, A, zero_add, zero_add,
union_diff_distrib, union_comm]
apply setIntegral_congr_set_ae
rw [union_ae_eq_right]
apply measure_mono_null diff_subset
rw [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem]
filter_upwards [ae_imp_of_ae_restrict ht_eq] with x hx h'x using h'x.2 (hx h'x.1)
#align measure_theory.integral_union_eq_left_of_ae_aux MeasureTheory.integral_union_eq_left_of_ae_aux
theorem integral_union_eq_left_of_ae (ht_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict t, f x = 0) :
∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
have ht : IntegrableOn f t μ := by apply integrableOn_zero.congr_fun_ae; symm; exact ht_eq
by_cases H : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ; swap
· rw [integral_undef H, integral_undef]; simpa [integrableOn_union, ht] using H
let f' := H.1.mk f
calc
∫ x : X in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x : X in s ∪ t, f' x ∂μ := integral_congr_ae H.1.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫ x in s, f' x ∂μ := by
apply
integral_union_eq_left_of_ae_aux _ H.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk (H.congr_fun_ae H.1.ae_eq_mk)
filter_upwards [ht_eq,
ae_mono (Measure.restrict_mono subset_union_right le_rfl) H.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx h'x
rw [← h'x, hx]
_ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_congr_ae
(ae_mono (Measure.restrict_mono subset_union_left le_rfl) H.1.ae_eq_mk.symm)
#align measure_theory.integral_union_eq_left_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_union_eq_left_of_ae
theorem integral_union_eq_left_of_forall₀ {f : X → E} (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(ht_eq : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = 0) : ∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_union_eq_left_of_ae ((ae_restrict_iff'₀ ht).2 (eventually_of_forall ht_eq))
#align measure_theory.integral_union_eq_left_of_forall₀ MeasureTheory.integral_union_eq_left_of_forall₀
theorem integral_union_eq_left_of_forall {f : X → E} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(ht_eq : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = 0) : ∫ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
integral_union_eq_left_of_forall₀ ht.nullMeasurableSet ht_eq
#align measure_theory.integral_union_eq_left_of_forall MeasureTheory.integral_union_eq_left_of_forall
theorem setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero_aux (hts : s ⊆ t)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ t \ s → f x = 0) (haux : StronglyMeasurable f)
(h'aux : IntegrableOn f t μ) : ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
let k := f ⁻¹' {0}
have hk : MeasurableSet k := by borelize E; exact haux.measurable (measurableSet_singleton _)
calc
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in t ∩ k, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in t \ k, f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_inter_add_diff hk h'aux]
_ = ∫ x in t \ k, f x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_, zero_add]; exact hx.2
_ = ∫ x in s \ k, f x ∂μ := by
apply setIntegral_congr_set_ae
filter_upwards [h't] with x hx
change (x ∈ t \ k) = (x ∈ s \ k)
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, eq_iff_iff, and_congr_left_iff, mem_diff]
intro h'x
by_cases xs : x ∈ s
· simp only [xs, hts xs]
· simp only [xs, iff_false_iff]
intro xt
exact h'x (hx ⟨xt, xs⟩)
_ = ∫ x in s ∩ k, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in s \ k, f x ∂μ := by
have : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ k, f x = 0 := fun x hx => hx.2
rw [setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero this, zero_add]
_ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by rw [integral_inter_add_diff hk (h'aux.mono hts le_rfl)]
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero_aux MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero_aux
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero_aux :=
setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero_aux
theorem setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (hts : s ⊆ t)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ t \ s → f x = 0) : ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases h : IntegrableOn f t μ; swap
· have : ¬IntegrableOn f s μ := fun H => h (H.of_ae_diff_eq_zero ht h't)
rw [integral_undef h, integral_undef this]
let f' := h.1.mk f
calc
∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in t, f' x ∂μ := integral_congr_ae h.1.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫ x in s, f' x ∂μ := by
apply
setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero_aux hts _ h.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk
(h.congr h.1.ae_eq_mk)
filter_upwards [h't, ae_imp_of_ae_restrict h.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx h'x h''x
rw [← h'x h''x.1, hx h''x]
_ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
apply integral_congr_ae
apply ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset hts
exact h.1.ae_eq_mk.symm
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero := setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero
theorem setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_forall_diff_eq_zero (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hts : s ⊆ t)
(h't : ∀ x ∈ t \ s, f x = 0) : ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ :=
setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero ht.nullMeasurableSet hts
(eventually_of_forall fun x hx => h't x hx)
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_of_subset_of_forall_diff_eq_zero MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_forall_diff_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_of_subset_of_forall_diff_eq_zero :=
setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_forall_diff_eq_zero
theorem setIntegral_eq_integral_of_ae_compl_eq_zero (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s → f x = 0) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
symm
nth_rw 1 [← integral_univ]
apply setIntegral_eq_of_subset_of_ae_diff_eq_zero nullMeasurableSet_univ (subset_univ _)
filter_upwards [h] with x hx h'x using hx h'x.2
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_integral_of_ae_compl_eq_zero MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_integral_of_ae_compl_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_integral_of_ae_compl_eq_zero := setIntegral_eq_integral_of_ae_compl_eq_zero
theorem setIntegral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) :
∫ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
setIntegral_eq_integral_of_ae_compl_eq_zero (eventually_of_forall h)
#align measure_theory.set_integral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero MeasureTheory.setIntegral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero :=
setIntegral_eq_integral_of_forall_compl_eq_zero
theorem setIntegral_neg_eq_setIntegral_nonpos [LinearOrder E] {f : X → E}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ x in {x | f x < 0}, f x ∂μ = ∫ x in {x | f x ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ := by
have h_union : {x | f x ≤ 0} = {x | f x < 0} ∪ {x | f x = 0} := by
simp_rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, setOf_or]
rw [h_union]
have B : NullMeasurableSet {x | f x = 0} μ :=
hf.nullMeasurableSet_eq_fun aestronglyMeasurable_zero
symm
refine integral_union_eq_left_of_ae ?_
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem₀ B] with x hx using hx
#align measure_theory.set_integral_neg_eq_set_integral_nonpos MeasureTheory.setIntegral_neg_eq_setIntegral_nonpos
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_neg_eq_set_integral_nonpos := setIntegral_neg_eq_setIntegral_nonpos
theorem integral_norm_eq_pos_sub_neg {f : X → ℝ} (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in {x | f x ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ :=
have h_meas : NullMeasurableSet {x | 0 ≤ f x} μ :=
aestronglyMeasurable_const.nullMeasurableSet_le hfi.1
calc
∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, ‖f x‖ ∂μ + ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, ‖f x‖ ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_add_compl₀ h_meas hfi.norm]
_ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ + ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, ‖f x‖ ∂μ := by
congr 1
refine setIntegral_congr₀ h_meas fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr _]
exact hx
_ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}ᶜ, f x ∂μ := by
congr 1
rw [← integral_neg]
refine setIntegral_congr₀ h_meas.compl fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_neg_self.mpr _]
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.nmem_setOf_iff] at hx
linarith
_ = ∫ x in {x | 0 ≤ f x}, f x ∂μ - ∫ x in {x | f x ≤ 0}, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← setIntegral_neg_eq_setIntegral_nonpos hfi.1, compl_setOf]; simp only [not_le]
#align measure_theory.integral_norm_eq_pos_sub_neg MeasureTheory.integral_norm_eq_pos_sub_neg
theorem setIntegral_const [CompleteSpace E] (c : E) : ∫ _ in s, c ∂μ = (μ s).toReal • c := by
rw [integral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_integral_const MeasureTheory.setIntegral_const
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_const := setIntegral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_indicator_const [CompleteSpace E] (e : E) ⦃s : Set X⦄ (s_meas : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x : X, s.indicator (fun _ : X => e) x ∂μ = (μ s).toReal • e := by
rw [integral_indicator s_meas, ← setIntegral_const]
#align measure_theory.integral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.integral_indicator_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_indicator_one ⦃s : Set X⦄ (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫ x, s.indicator 1 x ∂μ = (μ s).toReal :=
(integral_indicator_const 1 hs).trans ((smul_eq_mul _).trans (mul_one _))
#align measure_theory.integral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.integral_indicator_one
theorem setIntegral_indicatorConstLp [CompleteSpace E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (e : E) :
∫ x in s, indicatorConstLp p ht hμt e x ∂μ = (μ (t ∩ s)).toReal • e :=
calc
∫ x in s, indicatorConstLp p ht hμt e x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, t.indicator (fun _ => e) x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_congr_ae hs (indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
_ = (μ (t ∩ s)).toReal • e := by rw [integral_indicator_const _ ht, Measure.restrict_apply ht]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.set_integral_indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.setIntegral_indicatorConstLp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_indicatorConstLp := setIntegral_indicatorConstLp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 555 | 562 | theorem integral_indicatorConstLp [CompleteSpace E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (e : E) :
∫ x, indicatorConstLp p ht hμt e x ∂μ = (μ t).toReal • e :=
calc
∫ x, indicatorConstLp p ht hμt e x ∂μ = ∫ x in univ, indicatorConstLp p ht hμt e x ∂μ := by |
rw [integral_univ]
_ = (μ (t ∩ univ)).toReal • e := setIntegral_indicatorConstLp MeasurableSet.univ ht hμt e
_ = (μ t).toReal • e := by rw [inter_univ]
|
import Mathlib.Init.ZeroOne
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
#align_import data.set.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
open Function
universe u v w x
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebraSet : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align set.top_eq_univ Set.top_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.bot_eq_empty Set.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.sup_eq_union Set.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.inf_eq_inter Set.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.le_eq_subset Set.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.lt_eq_ssubset Set.lt_eq_ssubset
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.le_iff_subset Set.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.lt_iff_ssubset Set.lt_iff_ssubset
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.le HasSubset.Subset.le
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
#align has_ssubset.ssubset.lt HasSSubset.SSubset.lt
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift Set.PiSetCoe.canLift
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift' Set.PiSetCoe.canLift'
end Set
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
#align subtype.mem Subtype.mem
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
#align eq.subset Eq.subset
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
theorem ext_iff {s t : Set α} : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h x => by rw [h], ext⟩
#align set.ext_iff Set.ext_iff
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
#align set.mem_of_mem_of_subset Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
#align set.forall_in_swap Set.forall_in_swap
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_set_of Set.mem_setOf
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
#align has_mem.mem.out Membership.mem.out
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nmem_set_of_iff Set.nmem_setOf_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_mem_eq Set.setOf_mem_eq
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_set Set.setOf_set
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_app_iff Set.setOf_app_iff
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_def Set.mem_def
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
#align set.set_of_bijective Set.setOf_bijective
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_subset_set_of Set.setOf_subset_setOf
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_and Set.setOf_and
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_or Set.setOf_or
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
#align set.subset_def Set.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
#align set.ssubset_def Set.ssubset_def
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
#align set.subset.refl Set.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
#align set.subset.rfl Set.Subset.rfl
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
#align set.subset.trans Set.Subset.trans
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
#align set.mem_of_eq_of_mem Set.mem_of_eq_of_mem
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm Set.Subset.antisymm
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm_iff Set.Subset.antisymm_iff
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
#align set.eq_of_subset_of_subset Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
#align set.mem_of_subset_of_mem Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
#align set.not_mem_subset Set.not_mem_subset
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align set.not_subset Set.not_subset
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
#align set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset Set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
#align set.exists_of_ssubset Set.exists_of_ssubset
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
#align set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
#align set.ssubset_iff_of_subset Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
#align set.not_mem_empty Set.not_mem_empty
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_not_mem Set.not_not_mem
-- Porting note: we seem to need parentheses at `(↥s)`,
-- even if we increase the right precedence of `↥` in `Mathlib.Tactic.Coe`.
-- Porting note: removed `simp` as it is competing with `nonempty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty (↥s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align set.nonempty_coe_sort Set.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align set.nonempty.coe_sort Set.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nonempty_def Set.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_mem Set.nonempty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
#align set.nonempty.not_subset_empty Set.Nonempty.not_subset_empty
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
#align set.nonempty.some Set.Nonempty.some
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
#align set.nonempty.some_mem Set.Nonempty.some_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
#align set.nonempty.mono Set.Nonempty.mono
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_not_subset Set.nonempty_of_not_subset
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset Set.nonempty_of_ssubset
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.of_diff Set.Nonempty.of_diff
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset' Set.nonempty_of_ssubset'
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.nonempty.inl Set.Nonempty.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.nonempty.inr Set.Nonempty.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
#align set.union_nonempty Set.union_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.left Set.Nonempty.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
#align set.nonempty.right Set.Nonempty.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.inter_nonempty Set.inter_nonempty
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty Set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.univ_nonempty Set.univ_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
#align set.nonempty.to_subtype Set.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align set.nonempty.to_type Set.Nonempty.to_type
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
#align set.univ.nonempty Set.univ.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
#align set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
#align set.empty_def Set.empty_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_empty_iff_false Set.mem_empty_iff_false
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_false Set.setOf_false
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
#align set.empty_subset Set.empty_subset
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
#align set.subset_empty_iff Set.subset_empty_iff
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
#align set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
#align set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
#align set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty Set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
#align set.eq_empty_of_is_empty Set.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
#align set.unique_empty Set.uniqueEmpty
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
#align set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.ne_empty Set.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
#align set.not_nonempty_empty Set.not_nonempty_empty
-- Porting note: removing `@[simp]` as it is competing with `isEmpty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.is_empty_coe_sort Set.isEmpty_coe_sort
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
#align set.eq_empty_or_nonempty Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
#align set.subset_eq_empty Set.subset_eq_empty
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
#align set.ball_empty_iff Set.forall_mem_empty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_empty_iff := forall_mem_empty
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.empty_ssubset Set.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align set.nonempty.empty_ssubset Set.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_true Set.setOf_true
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
#align set.univ_eq_empty_iff Set.univ_eq_empty_iff
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
#align set.empty_ne_univ Set.empty_ne_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.subset_univ Set.subset_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
#align set.univ_subset_iff Set.univ_subset_iff
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
#align set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset Set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
#align set.eq_univ_iff_forall Set.eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
#align set.eq_univ_of_forall Set.eq_univ_of_forall
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
#align set.nonempty.eq_univ Set.Nonempty.eq_univ
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
#align set.eq_univ_of_subset Set.eq_univ_of_subset
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.exists_mem_of_nonempty Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem Set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem Set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
#align set.univ_unique Set.univ_unique
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
#align set.ssubset_univ_iff Set.ssubset_univ_iff
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
#align set.nontrivial_of_nonempty Set.nontrivial_of_nonempty
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.union_def Set.union_def
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
#align set.mem_union_left Set.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_union_right Set.mem_union_right
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
#align set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union Set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
#align set.mem_union.elim Set.MemUnion.elim
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_union Set.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
#align set.union_self Set.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => or_false_iff _
#align set.union_empty Set.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => false_or_iff _
#align set.empty_union Set.empty_union
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
#align set.union_comm Set.union_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.union_assoc Set.union_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
#align set.union_is_assoc Set.union_isAssoc
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
#align set.union_is_comm Set.union_isComm
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_left_comm Set.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
#align set.union_right_comm Set.union_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
#align set.union_eq_left_iff_subset Set.union_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
#align set.union_eq_right_iff_subset Set.union_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.subset_union_left Set.subset_union_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_union_right Set.subset_union_right
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
#align set.union_subset Set.union_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
#align set.union_subset_iff Set.union_subset_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.union_subset_union Set.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align set.union_subset_union_left Set.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align set.union_subset_union_right Set.union_subset_union_right
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_left Set.subset_union_of_subset_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_right Set.subset_union_of_subset_right
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align set.union_congr_left Set.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align set.union_congr_right Set.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_left Set.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_right Set.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
#align set.union_empty_iff Set.union_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
#align set.union_univ Set.union_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
#align set.univ_union Set.univ_union
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.inter_def Set.inter_def
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_inter_iff Set.mem_inter_iff
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.mem_inter Set.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_left Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_right Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
#align set.inter_self Set.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => and_false_iff _
#align set.inter_empty Set.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_inter Set.empty_inter
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.inter_comm Set.inter_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
#align set.inter_assoc Set.inter_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
#align set.inter_is_assoc Set.inter_isAssoc
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
#align set.inter_is_comm Set.inter_isComm
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
#align set.inter_left_comm Set.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
#align set.inter_right_comm Set.inter_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.inter_subset_left Set.inter_subset_left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
#align set.inter_subset_right Set.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
#align set.subset_inter Set.subset_inter
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
#align set.subset_inter_iff Set.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
#align set.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align set.inter_congr_left Set.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align set.inter_congr_right Set.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
#align set.inter_univ Set.inter_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
#align set.univ_inter Set.univ_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.inter_subset_inter Set.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
#align set.inter_subset_inter_left Set.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
#align set.inter_subset_inter_right Set.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
#align set.union_inter_cancel_left Set.union_inter_cancel_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
#align set.union_inter_cancel_right Set.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
#align set.inter_set_of_eq_sep Set.inter_setOf_eq_sep
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.set_of_inter_eq_sep Set.setOf_inter_eq_sep
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_left Set.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_right Set.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_left Set.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_right Set.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_left Set.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_right Set.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_left Set.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_right Set.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.union_union_union_comm Set.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_inter_comm Set.inter_inter_inter_comm
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.insert_def Set.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x s := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_insert Set.subset_insert
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : x ∈ insert x s :=
Or.inl rfl
#align set.mem_insert Set.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : Set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_insert_of_mem Set.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
id
#align set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne : b ∈ insert a s → b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
Or.resolve_left
#align set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert : b ∈ insert a s → b ∉ s → b = a :=
Or.resolve_right
#align set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_insert_iff Set.mem_insert_iff
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_right_of_imp fun e => e.symm ▸ h
#align set.insert_eq_of_mem Set.insert_eq_of_mem
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem {s : Set α} (t : Set α) {a : α} : a ∉ s → s ≠ insert a t :=
mt fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
#align set.ne_insert_of_not_mem Set.ne_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align set.insert_eq_self Set.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align set.insert_ne_self Set.insert_ne_self
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_insert_iff, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align set.insert_subset Set.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha, hs⟩
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t := fun _ => Or.imp_right (@h _)
#align set.insert_subset_insert Set.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] theorem insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => ?_, insert_subset_insert⟩
rcases h (subset_insert _ _ hx) with (rfl | hxt)
exacts [(ha hx).elim, hxt]
#align set.insert_subset_insert_iff Set.insert_subset_insert_iff
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
forall₂_congr fun _ hb => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha
#align set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem ssubset_iff_insert {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := by
simp only [insert_subset_iff, exists_and_right, ssubset_def, not_subset]
aesop
#align set.ssubset_iff_insert Set.ssubset_iff_insert
theorem ssubset_insert {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_insert.2 ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align set.ssubset_insert Set.ssubset_insert
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.insert_comm Set.insert_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_insert _ _
#align set.insert_idem Set.insert_idem
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.insert_union Set.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_insert Set.union_insert
@[simp]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert a s⟩
#align set.insert_nonempty Set.insert_nonempty
instance (a : α) (s : Set α) : Nonempty (insert a s : Set α) :=
(insert_nonempty a s).to_subtype
theorem insert_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_and_left
#align set.insert_inter_distrib Set.insert_inter_distrib
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_or_distrib_left
#align set.insert_union_distrib Set.insert_union_distrib
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert a s) ha,
congr_arg (fun x => insert x s)⟩
#align set.insert_inj Set.insert_inj
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x)
(x) (h : x ∈ s) : P x :=
H _ (Or.inr h)
#align set.forall_of_forall_insert Set.forall_of_forall_insert
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a)
(x) (h : x ∈ insert a s) : P x :=
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ ha) (H _)
#align set.forall_insert_of_forall Set.forall_insert_of_forall
theorem exists_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ (P a ∨ ∃ x ∈ s, P x) := by
simp [mem_insert_iff, or_and_right, exists_and_left, exists_or]
#align set.bex_insert_iff Set.exists_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias bex_insert_iff := exists_mem_insert
theorem forall_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
forall₂_or_left.trans <| and_congr_left' forall_eq
#align set.ball_insert_iff Set.forall_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_insert_iff := forall_mem_insert
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Set α) :=
⟨fun x => Set.ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, mem_insert_iff, or_false]
exact Iff.rfl⟩
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) = insert a ∅ :=
(insert_emptyc_eq a).symm
#align set.singleton_def Set.singleton_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : Set α) ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_singleton_iff Set.mem_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { n | n = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton' {a : α} : { x | a = x } = {a} :=
ext fun _ => eq_comm
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton' Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton'
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
--Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute
theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Set α) :=
@rfl _ _
#align set.mem_singleton Set.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Set α)) : x = y :=
h
#align set.eq_of_mem_singleton Set.eq_of_mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : Set α) ↔ x = y :=
ext_iff.trans eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
#align set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
singleton_eq_singleton_iff.mp
#align set.singleton_injective Set.singleton_injective
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : Set α) :=
H
#align set.mem_singleton_of_eq Set.mem_singleton_of_eq
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = ({x} : Set α) ∪ s :=
rfl
#align set.insert_eq Set.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, rfl⟩
#align set.singleton_nonempty Set.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty _).ne_empty
#align set.singleton_ne_empty Set.singleton_ne_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Set α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align set.empty_ssubset_singleton Set.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
forall_eq
#align set.singleton_subset_iff Set.singleton_subset_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align set.singleton_subset_singleton Set.singleton_subset_singleton
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { b | b = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton Set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_union Set.singleton_union
@[simp]
theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.union_singleton Set.union_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_nonempty : ({a} ∩ s).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, mem_inter_iff, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
#align set.singleton_inter_nonempty Set.singleton_inter_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_nonempty : (s ∩ {a}).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_singleton_nonempty Set.inter_singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans singleton_inter_nonempty.not
#align set.singleton_inter_eq_empty Set.singleton_inter_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
#align set.inter_singleton_eq_empty Set.inter_singleton_eq_empty
theorem nmem_singleton_empty {s : Set α} : s ∉ ({∅} : Set (Set α)) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.nmem_singleton_empty Set.nmem_singleton_empty
instance uniqueSingleton (a : α) : Unique (↥({a} : Set α)) :=
⟨⟨⟨a, mem_singleton a⟩⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.eq h⟩
#align set.unique_singleton Set.uniqueSingleton
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_comm.trans <| and_congr_left' singleton_subset_iff
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.trans <|
and_congr_left fun H => ⟨fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => H x h ▸ h⟩
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
-- while `simp` is capable of proving this, it is not capable of turning the LHS into the RHS.
@[simp]
theorem default_coe_singleton (x : α) : (default : ({x} : Set α)) = ⟨x, rfl⟩ :=
rfl
#align set.default_coe_singleton Set.default_coe_singleton
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {α : Type*} {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.subset_singleton_iff Set.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff_eq {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨fun _ => Or.inl rfl, fun _ => empty_subset _⟩
· simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, hs, hs.ne_empty]
#align set.subset_singleton_iff_eq Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq
theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff (h : s.Nonempty) : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff_eq.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Set.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊂ {x} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [ssubset_iff_subset_ne, subset_singleton_iff_eq, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h => h ▸ (singleton_ne_empty _).symm
#align set.ssubset_singleton_iff Set.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Set α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton {α} [Subsingleton α] (s t : Set α) [Nonempty s]
[Nonempty t] : s = t :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.trans nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.symm
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {α} [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} (t : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) [Nonempty t] : s = t :=
have := hs.to_subtype; eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton s t
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_zero [Subsingleton α] [Zero α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {0} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {0} h
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_one [Subsingleton α] [One α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {1} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {1} h
protected theorem disjoint_iff : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le
#align set.disjoint_iff Set.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
theorem _root_.Disjoint.inter_eq : Disjoint s t → s ∩ t = ∅ :=
Disjoint.eq_bot
#align disjoint.inter_eq Disjoint.inter_eq
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => not_and
#align set.disjoint_left Set.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align set.disjoint_right Set.disjoint_right
lemma not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Set.disjoint_iff.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ not_not
#align set.not_disjoint_iff Set.not_disjoint_iff
lemma not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬ Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := not_disjoint_iff
#align set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align set.nonempty.not_disjoint Set.Nonempty.not_disjoint
lemma disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Set α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
(em _).imp_right not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter.1
#align set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
lemma disjoint_iff_forall_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ t → a ≠ b := by
simp only [Ne, disjoint_left, @imp_not_comm _ (_ = _), forall_eq']
#align set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne Set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne
alias ⟨_root_.Disjoint.ne_of_mem, _⟩ := disjoint_iff_forall_ne
#align disjoint.ne_of_mem Disjoint.ne_of_mem
lemma disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_left h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_left Set.disjoint_of_subset_left
lemma disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_right h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_right Set.disjoint_of_subset_right
lemma disjoint_of_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h : Disjoint s₂ t₂) : Disjoint s₁ t₁ :=
h.mono hs ht
#align set.disjoint_of_subset Set.disjoint_of_subset
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := disjoint_sup_left
#align set.disjoint_union_left Set.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := disjoint_sup_right
#align set.disjoint_union_right Set.disjoint_union_right
@[simp] lemma disjoint_empty (s : Set α) : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
#align set.disjoint_empty Set.disjoint_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_disjoint (s : Set α) : Disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
#align set.empty_disjoint Set.empty_disjoint
@[simp] lemma univ_disjoint : Disjoint univ s ↔ s = ∅ := top_disjoint
#align set.univ_disjoint Set.univ_disjoint
@[simp] lemma disjoint_univ : Disjoint s univ ↔ s = ∅ := disjoint_top
#align set.disjoint_univ Set.disjoint_univ
lemma disjoint_sdiff_left : Disjoint (t \ s) s := disjoint_sdiff_self_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_left Set.disjoint_sdiff_left
lemma disjoint_sdiff_right : Disjoint s (t \ s) := disjoint_sdiff_self_right
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_right Set.disjoint_sdiff_right
-- TODO: prove this in terms of a lattice lemma
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_inter Set.disjoint_sdiff_inter
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
#align set.diff_union_diff_cancel Set.diff_union_diff_cancel
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
#align set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union Set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union
@[simp default+1]
lemma disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s := by simp [Set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]
#align set.disjoint_singleton_left Set.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align set.disjoint_singleton_right Set.disjoint_singleton_right
lemma disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Set α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
simp
#align set.disjoint_singleton Set.disjoint_singleton
lemma subset_diff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u := le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align set.subset_diff Set.subset_diff
lemma ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t \ {a} := by
simp [ssubset_iff_insert, subset_diff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_left Set.inter_diff_distrib_left
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_right Set.inter_diff_distrib_right
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_def Set.compl_def
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
#align set.mem_compl Set.mem_compl
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_set_of Set.compl_setOf
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_compl Set.not_mem_of_mem_compl
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_mem_compl_iff Set.not_mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
#align set.inter_compl_self Set.inter_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
#align set.compl_inter_self Set.compl_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
#align set.compl_empty Set.compl_empty
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
#align set.compl_union Set.compl_union
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
#align set.compl_inter Set.compl_inter
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
#align set.compl_univ Set.compl_univ
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
#align set.compl_empty_iff Set.compl_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
#align set.compl_univ_iff Set.compl_univ_iff
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.compl_ne_univ Set.compl_ne_univ
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
#align set.nonempty_compl Set.nonempty_compl
@[simp] lemma nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : Set.Nonempty {x}ᶜ := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_ne x
exact ⟨y, by simp [hy]⟩
theorem mem_compl_singleton_iff {a x : α} : x ∈ ({a} : Set α)ᶜ ↔ x ≠ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_compl_singleton_iff Set.mem_compl_singleton_iff
theorem compl_singleton_eq (a : α) : ({a} : Set α)ᶜ = { x | x ≠ a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_singleton_eq Set.compl_singleton_eq
@[simp]
theorem compl_ne_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({ x | x ≠ a } : Set α)ᶜ = {a} :=
compl_compl _
#align set.compl_ne_eq_singleton Set.compl_ne_eq_singleton
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
#align set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl Set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
#align set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl Set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
#align set.union_compl_self Set.union_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
#align set.compl_union_self Set.compl_union_self
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
#align set.compl_subset_comm Set.compl_subset_comm
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
#align set.subset_compl_comm Set.subset_compl_comm
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.compl_subset_compl Set.compl_subset_compl
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint t s :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_left (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_right (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset : Disjoint sᶜ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
disjoint_compl_left_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset : Disjoint s tᶜ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
disjoint_compl_right_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_right⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.subset_compl_right Disjoint.subset_compl_right
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_left⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.subset_compl_left Disjoint.subset_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left⟩ := disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_left HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right⟩ := disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_right HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
#align set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset Set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
#align set.compl_subset_iff_union Set.compl_subset_iff_union
@[simp]
theorem subset_compl_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s :=
subset_compl_comm.trans singleton_subset_iff
#align set.subset_compl_singleton_iff Set.subset_compl_singleton_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
#align set.inter_subset Set.inter_subset
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
#align set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff Set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
#align set.not_mem_diff_of_mem Set.not_mem_diff_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_diff Set.mem_of_mem_diff
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_diff Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
#align set.diff_eq_compl_inter Set.diff_eq_compl_inter
theorem nonempty_diff {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty_diff Set.nonempty_diff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
#align set.diff_subset Set.diff_subset
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
#align set.union_diff_cancel' Set.union_diff_cancel'
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align set.union_diff_cancel Set.union_diff_cancel
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_left Set.union_diff_cancel_left
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_right Set.union_diff_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align set.union_diff_left Set.union_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align set.union_diff_right Set.union_diff_right
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
#align set.union_diff_distrib Set.union_diff_distrib
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inf_sdiff_assoc
#align set.inter_diff_assoc Set.inter_diff_assoc
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
#align set.inter_diff_self Set.inter_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
#align set.inter_union_diff Set.inter_union_diff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 1,837 | 1,839 | theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by |
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Uniform
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open Topology ComplexConjugate
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
class Inner (𝕜 E : Type*) where
inner : E → E → 𝕜
#align has_inner Inner
export Inner (inner)
notation3:max "⟪" x ", " y "⟫_" 𝕜:max => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
class InnerProductSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] extends
NormedSpace 𝕜 E, Inner 𝕜 E where
norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner x x)
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space InnerProductSpace
-- @[nolint HasNonemptyInstance] porting note: I don't think we have this linter anymore
structure InnerProductSpace.Core (𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] extends Inner 𝕜 F where
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x)
definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space.core InnerProductSpace.Core
attribute [class] InnerProductSpace.Core
def InnerProductSpace.toCore [NormedAddCommGroup E] [c : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E :=
{ c with
nonneg_re := fun x => by
rw [← InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner]
apply sq_nonneg
definite := fun x hx =>
norm_eq_zero.1 <| pow_eq_zero (n := 2) <| by
rw [InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, hx, map_zero] }
#align inner_product_space.to_core InnerProductSpace.toCore
namespace InnerProductSpace.Core
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation "normSqK" => @RCLike.normSq 𝕜 _
local notation "reK" => @RCLike.re 𝕜 _
local notation "ext_iff" => @RCLike.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
def toInner' : Inner 𝕜 F :=
c.toInner
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_inner' InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner'
attribute [local instance] toInner'
def normSq (x : F) :=
reK ⟪x, x⟫
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq
local notation "normSqF" => @normSq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.conj_symm x y
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_conj_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_conj_symm
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
c.nonneg_re _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_nonneg InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_im (x : F) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]
simp [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_im InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_right
theorem ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (normSqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [ext_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [ofReal_re]; rfl, by simp only [inner_self_im, ofReal_im]⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.coe_norm_sq_eq_inner_self InnerProductSpace.Core.ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : F) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_re_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : F) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_im_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left];
simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_symm, RingHom.map_mul]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_right
theorem inner_zero_left (x : F) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left];
simp only [zero_mul, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_left
theorem inner_zero_right (x : F) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_right
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨c.definite _, by
rintro rfl
exact inner_zero_left _⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_zero
theorem normSq_eq_zero {x : F} : normSqF x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans
(by simp only [normSq, ext_iff, map_zero, inner_self_im, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff])
(@inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ x)
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_ne_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ne_zero
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : F) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_re_to_K InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_symm
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : F) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_left
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : F) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_right
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 286 | 287 | theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by |
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left, inner_neg_left]
|
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
#align_import group_theory.exponent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
open scoped Classical
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
@[to_additive
"A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such\n
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def ExponentExists :=
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
#align monoid.exponent_exists Monoid.ExponentExists
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists AddMonoid.ExponentExists
@[to_additive
"The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that\n
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : ExponentExists G then Nat.find h else 0
#align monoid.exponent Monoid.exponent
#align add_monoid.exponent AddMonoid.exponent
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoid.exponent_additive :
AddMonoid.exponent (Additive G) = exponent G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exponent_multiplicative {G : Type*} [AddMonoid G] :
exponent (Multiplicative G) = AddMonoid.exponent G := rfl
open MulOpposite in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.MulOpposite.exponent : exponent (MulOpposite G) = exponent G := by
simp only [Monoid.exponent, ExponentExists]
congr!
all_goals exact ⟨(op_injective <| · <| op ·), (unop_injective <| · <| unop ·)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.isOfFinOrder (h : ExponentExists G) {g : G} : IsOfFinOrder g :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by peel 2 h; exact this g
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.orderOf_pos (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : 0 < orderOf g :=
h.isOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_ne_zero : exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ ExponentExists G := by
rw [exponent]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ]
--if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
· tauto
#align monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero Monoid.exponent_ne_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero AddMonoid.exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_ne_zero⟩ := exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-27"))]
theorem exponentExists_iff_ne_zero : ExponentExists G ↔ exponent G ≠ 0 := exponent_ne_zero.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos : 0 < exponent G ↔ ExponentExists G :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_pos⟩ := exponent_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.not_right
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : orderOf g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun h ↦ h.orderOf_pos g |>.ne' hg
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero
@[to_additive "The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that
`n • g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff_forall : exponent G = 0 ↔ ∀ n > 0, ∃ g : G, g ^ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [exponent_eq_zero_iff, ExponentExists]
push_neg
rfl
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 := by
by_cases h : ExponentExists G
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h]
exact (Nat.find_spec h).2 g
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero]
#align monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one
#align add_monoid.exponent_nsmul_eq_zero AddMonoid.exponent_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_mod_exponent {n : ℕ} (g : G) : g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G) :=
calc
g ^ n = g ^ (n % exponent G + exponent G * (n / exponent G)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = g ^ (n % exponent G) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, pow_exponent_eq_one]
#align monoid.pow_eq_mod_exponent Monoid.pow_eq_mod_exponent
#align add_monoid.nsmul_eq_mod_exponent AddMonoid.nsmul_eq_mod_exponent
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos_of_exists (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) :
0 < exponent G :=
ExponentExists.exponent_pos ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
#align monoid.exponent_pos_of_exists Monoid.exponent_pos_of_exists
#align add_monoid.exponent_pos_of_exists AddMonoid.exponent_pos_of_exists
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min' (n : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < n) (hG : ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1) : exponent G ≤ n := by
rw [exponent, dif_pos]
· apply Nat.find_min'
exact ⟨hpos, hG⟩
· exact ⟨n, hpos, hG⟩
#align monoid.exponent_min' Monoid.exponent_min'
#align add_monoid.exponent_min' AddMonoid.exponent_min'
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_min (m : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < m) (hm : m < exponent G) : ∃ g : G, g ^ m ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h
have hcon : exponent G ≤ m := exponent_min' m hpos h
omega
#align monoid.exponent_min Monoid.exponent_min
#align add_monoid.exponent_min AddMonoid.exponent_min
@[to_additive AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_iff]
theorem exp_eq_one_iff : exponent G = 1 ↔ Subsingleton G := by
refine ⟨fun eq_one => ⟨fun a b => ?a_eq_b⟩, fun h => le_antisymm ?le ?ge⟩
· rw [← pow_one a, ← pow_one b, ← eq_one, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one, Monoid.pow_exponent_eq_one]
· apply exponent_min' _ Nat.one_pos
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt
apply exponent_pos_of_exists 1 Nat.one_pos
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton]
theorem exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton [hs : Subsingleton G] : exponent G = 1 :=
exp_eq_one_iff.mpr hs
#align monoid.exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton Monoid.exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton
#align add_monoid.exp_eq_zero_of_subsingleton AddMonoid.exp_eq_one_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive addOrder_dvd_exponent]
theorem order_dvd_exponent (g : G) : orderOf g ∣ exponent G :=
orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one <| pow_exponent_eq_one g
#align monoid.order_dvd_exponent Monoid.order_dvd_exponent
#align add_monoid.add_order_dvd_exponent AddMonoid.addOrder_dvd_exponent
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_le_exponent (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : orderOf g ≤ exponent G :=
Nat.le_of_dvd h.exponent_pos (order_dvd_exponent g)
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one {n : ℕ} : exponent G ∣ n ↔ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1 := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp
constructor
· intro h g
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero] at h
rw [pow_eq_mod_exponent, h, pow_zero]
· intro hG
by_contra h
rw [Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero, ← Ne, ← pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
have h₂ : n % exponent G < exponent G := Nat.mod_lt _ (exponent_pos_of_exists n hpos hG)
have h₃ : exponent G ≤ n % exponent G := by
apply exponent_min' _ h
simp_rw [← pow_eq_mod_exponent]
exact hG
exact h₂.not_le h₃
@[to_additive]
alias ⟨_, exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one⟩ := exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one
#align monoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one Monoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_pow_eq_one
#align add_monoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_nsmul_eq_zero AddMonoid.exponent_dvd_of_forall_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_dvd {n : ℕ} : exponent G ∣ n ↔ ∀ g : G, orderOf g ∣ n := by
simp_rw [exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one, orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
variable (G)
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-27"))]
theorem exponent_dvd_of_forall_orderOf_dvd (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ g : G, orderOf g ∣ n) : exponent G ∣ n :=
exponent_dvd.mpr h
@[to_additive]
theorem lcm_orderOf_dvd_exponent [Fintype G] :
(Finset.univ : Finset G).lcm orderOf ∣ exponent G := by
apply Finset.lcm_dvd
intro g _
exact order_dvd_exponent g
#align monoid.lcm_order_of_dvd_exponent Monoid.lcm_orderOf_dvd_exponent
#align add_monoid.lcm_add_order_of_dvd_exponent AddMonoid.lcm_addOrderOf_dvd_exponent
@[to_additive exists_addOrderOf_eq_pow_padic_val_nat_add_exponent]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Exponent.lean | 261 | 286 | theorem _root_.Nat.Prime.exists_orderOf_eq_pow_factorization_exponent {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
∃ g : G, orderOf g = p ^ (exponent G).factorization p := by |
haveI := Fact.mk hp
rcases eq_or_ne ((exponent G).factorization p) 0 with (h | h)
· refine ⟨1, by rw [h, pow_zero, orderOf_one]⟩
have he : 0 < exponent G :=
Ne.bot_lt fun ht => by
rw [ht] at h
apply h
rw [bot_eq_zero, Nat.factorization_zero, Finsupp.zero_apply]
rw [← Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g : G, g ^ (exponent G / p) ≠ 1 := by
suffices key : ¬exponent G ∣ exponent G / p by
rwa [exponent_dvd_iff_forall_pow_eq_one, not_forall] at key
exact fun hd =>
hp.one_lt.not_le
((mul_le_iff_le_one_left he).mp <|
Nat.le_of_dvd he <| Nat.mul_dvd_of_dvd_div (Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactors h) hd)
obtain ⟨k, hk : exponent G = p ^ _ * k⟩ := Nat.ord_proj_dvd _ _
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp h)
refine ⟨g ^ k, ?_⟩
rw [ht]
apply orderOf_eq_prime_pow
· rwa [hk, mul_comm, ht, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.pos, pow_mul] at hg
· rw [← Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← ht, ← pow_mul, mul_comm, ← hk]
exact pow_exponent_eq_one g
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.alexandroff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
open Set Filter Topology
variable {X : Type*}
def OnePoint (X : Type*) :=
Option X
#align alexandroff OnePoint
instance [Repr X] : Repr (OnePoint X) :=
⟨fun o _ =>
match o with
| none => "∞"
| some a => "↑" ++ repr a⟩
namespace OnePoint
@[match_pattern] def infty : OnePoint X := none
#align alexandroff.infty OnePoint.infty
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "∞" => OnePoint.infty
@[coe, match_pattern] def some : X → OnePoint X := Option.some
instance : CoeTC X (OnePoint X) := ⟨some⟩
instance : Inhabited (OnePoint X) := ⟨∞⟩
instance [Fintype X] : Fintype (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Fintype (Option X))
instance infinite [Infinite X] : Infinite (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Infinite (Option X))
#align alexandroff.infinite OnePoint.infinite
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
Option.some_injective X
#align alexandroff.coe_injective OnePoint.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : X} : (x : OnePoint X) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
#align alexandroff.coe_eq_coe OnePoint.coe_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_infty (x : X) : (x : OnePoint X) ≠ ∞ :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.coe_ne_infty OnePoint.coe_ne_infty
@[simp]
theorem infty_ne_coe (x : X) : ∞ ≠ (x : OnePoint X) :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.infty_ne_coe OnePoint.infty_ne_coe
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec {C : OnePoint X → Sort*} (h₁ : C ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x : X, C x) :
∀ z : OnePoint X, C z
| ∞ => h₁
| (x : X) => h₂ x
#align alexandroff.rec OnePoint.rec
theorem isCompl_range_coe_infty : IsCompl (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) {∞} :=
isCompl_range_some_none X
#align alexandroff.is_compl_range_coe_infty OnePoint.isCompl_range_coe_infty
-- Porting note: moved @[simp] to a new lemma
theorem range_coe_union_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∪ {∞} = univ :=
range_some_union_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_union_infty OnePoint.range_coe_union_infty
@[simp]
theorem insert_infty_range_coe : insert ∞ (range (@some X)) = univ :=
insert_none_range_some _
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_inter_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∩ {∞} = ∅ :=
range_some_inter_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_inter_infty OnePoint.range_coe_inter_infty
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_coe : (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X))ᶜ = {∞} :=
compl_range_some X
#align alexandroff.compl_range_coe OnePoint.compl_range_coe
theorem compl_infty : ({∞}ᶜ : Set (OnePoint X)) = range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
(@isCompl_range_coe_infty X).symm.compl_eq
#align alexandroff.compl_infty OnePoint.compl_infty
theorem compl_image_coe (s : Set X) : ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ = (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [coe_injective.compl_image_eq, compl_range_coe]
#align alexandroff.compl_image_coe OnePoint.compl_image_coe
theorem ne_infty_iff_exists {x : OnePoint X} : x ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ y : X, (y : OnePoint X) = x := by
induction x using OnePoint.rec <;> simp
#align alexandroff.ne_infty_iff_exists OnePoint.ne_infty_iff_exists
instance canLift : CanLift (OnePoint X) X (↑) fun x => x ≠ ∞ :=
WithTop.canLift
#align alexandroff.can_lift OnePoint.canLift
theorem not_mem_range_coe_iff {x : OnePoint X} : x ∉ range some ↔ x = ∞ := by
rw [← mem_compl_iff, compl_range_coe, mem_singleton_iff]
#align alexandroff.not_mem_range_coe_iff OnePoint.not_mem_range_coe_iff
theorem infty_not_mem_range_coe : ∞ ∉ range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
not_mem_range_coe_iff.2 rfl
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_range_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_range_coe
theorem infty_not_mem_image_coe {s : Set X} : ∞ ∉ ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) '' s :=
not_mem_subset (image_subset_range _ _) infty_not_mem_range_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_image_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_infty : ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' {∞} = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align alexandroff.coe_preimage_infty OnePoint.coe_preimage_infty
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
instance : TopologicalSpace (OnePoint X) where
IsOpen s := (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) ∧
IsOpen (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro ⟨hms, hs⟩ ⟨hmt, ht⟩
refine ⟨?_, hs.inter ht⟩
rintro ⟨hms', hmt'⟩
simpa [compl_inter] using (hms hms').union (hmt hmt')
isOpen_sUnion S ho := by
suffices IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' ⋃₀ S : Set X) by
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rintro ⟨s, hsS : s ∈ S, hs : ∞ ∈ s⟩
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset ((ho s hsS).1 hs) this.isClosed_compl ?_
exact compl_subset_compl.mpr (preimage_mono <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hsS)
rw [preimage_sUnion]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun s hs => (ho s hs).2
variable {s : Set (OnePoint X)} {t : Set X}
theorem isOpen_def :
IsOpen s ↔ (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ) ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) :=
Iff.rfl
#align alexandroff.is_open_def OnePoint.isOpen_def
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem' (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem' OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem'
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_of_mem' h, isClosed_compl_iff, and_comm]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem
theorem isOpen_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_not_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) : IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
have : ∞ ∉ sᶜ := fun H => H h
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_not_mem this, ← isOpen_compl_iff, preimage_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_mem (mem_compl h), ← preimage_compl, compl_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_image_coe {s : Set X} : IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_not_mem infty_not_mem_image_coe, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.is_open_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_image_coe
theorem isOpen_compl_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_mem, ← preimage_compl, compl_compl, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
exact infty_not_mem_image_coe
#align alexandroff.is_open_compl_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_compl_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsClosed ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_compl_image_coe]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_image_coe OnePoint.isClosed_image_coe
def opensOfCompl (s : Set X) (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsCompact s) :
TopologicalSpace.Opens (OnePoint X) :=
⟨((↑) '' s)ᶜ, isOpen_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
#align alexandroff.opens_of_compl OnePoint.opensOfCompl
theorem infty_mem_opensOfCompl {s : Set X} (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsCompact s) :
∞ ∈ opensOfCompl s h₁ h₂ :=
mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_mem_opens_of_compl OnePoint.infty_mem_opensOfCompl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
continuous_def.mpr fun _s hs => hs.right
#align alexandroff.continuous_coe OnePoint.continuous_coe
theorem isOpenMap_coe : IsOpenMap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) := fun _ => isOpen_image_coe.2
#align alexandroff.is_open_map_coe OnePoint.isOpenMap_coe
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_coe coe_injective isOpenMap_coe
#align alexandroff.open_embedding_coe OnePoint.openEmbedding_coe
theorem isOpen_range_coe : IsOpen (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) :=
openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range
#align alexandroff.is_open_range_coe OnePoint.isOpen_range_coe
theorem isClosed_infty : IsClosed ({∞} : Set (OnePoint X)) := by
rw [← compl_range_coe, isClosed_compl_iff]
exact isOpen_range_coe
#align alexandroff.is_closed_infty OnePoint.isClosed_infty
theorem nhds_coe_eq (x : X) : 𝓝 ↑x = map ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq x).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_coe_eq OnePoint.nhds_coe_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_coe_image (s : Set X) (x : X) :
𝓝[(↑) '' s] (x : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (𝓝[s] x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq _ _).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_coe_image OnePoint.nhdsWithin_coe_image
theorem nhdsWithin_coe (s : Set (OnePoint X)) (x : X) : 𝓝[s] ↑x = map (↑) (𝓝[(↑) ⁻¹' s] x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq _ _).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_coe OnePoint.nhdsWithin_coe
theorem comap_coe_nhds (x : X) : comap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x :=
(openEmbedding_coe.toInducing.nhds_eq_comap x).symm
#align alexandroff.comap_coe_nhds OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds
instance nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot (x : X) [h : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
NeBot (𝓝[≠] (x : OnePoint X)) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_coe, preimage, coe_eq_coe] using h.map some
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_coe_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq : 𝓝[≠] (∞ : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (coclosedCompact X) := by
refine (nhdsWithin_basis_open ∞ _).ext (hasBasis_coclosedCompact.map _) ?_ ?_
· rintro s ⟨hs, hso⟩
refine ⟨_, (isOpen_iff_of_mem hs).mp hso, ?_⟩
simp [Subset.rfl]
· rintro s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe, isOpen_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩, ?_⟩
simp [compl_image_coe, ← diff_eq, subset_preimage_image]
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_eq OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq
instance nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (∞ : OnePoint X)) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq]
infer_instance
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot
instance (priority := 900) nhdsWithin_compl_neBot [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] [NoncompactSpace X]
(x : OnePoint X) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
OnePoint.rec OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot
(fun y => OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot y) x
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_neBot
theorem nhds_infty_eq : 𝓝 (∞ : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (coclosedCompact X) ⊔ pure ∞ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq, nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure]
#align alexandroff.nhds_infty_eq OnePoint.nhds_infty_eq
theorem hasBasis_nhds_infty :
(𝓝 (∞ : OnePoint X)).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s) fun s =>
(↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [nhds_infty_eq]
exact (hasBasis_coclosedCompact.map _).sup_pure _
#align alexandroff.has_basis_nhds_infty OnePoint.hasBasis_nhds_infty
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe_nhds_infty : comap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 ∞) = coclosedCompact X := by
simp [nhds_infty_eq, comap_sup, comap_map coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.comap_coe_nhds_infty OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds_infty
theorem le_nhds_infty {f : Filter (OnePoint X)} :
f ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → IsCompact s → (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} ∈ f := by
simp only [hasBasis_nhds_infty.ge_iff, and_imp]
#align alexandroff.le_nhds_infty OnePoint.le_nhds_infty
theorem ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty {f : Ultrafilter (OnePoint X)} :
(f : Filter (OnePoint X)) ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → IsCompact s → (↑) '' s ∉ f := by
simp only [le_nhds_infty, ← compl_image_coe, Ultrafilter.mem_coe,
Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem]
#align alexandroff.ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty OnePoint.ultrafilter_le_nhds_infty
theorem tendsto_nhds_infty' {α : Type*} {f : OnePoint X → α} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ∞) l ↔ Tendsto f (pure ∞) l ∧ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑)) (coclosedCompact X) l := by
simp [nhds_infty_eq, and_comm]
#align alexandroff.tendsto_nhds_infty' OnePoint.tendsto_nhds_infty'
theorem tendsto_nhds_infty {α : Type*} {f : OnePoint X → α} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ∞) l ↔
∀ s ∈ l, f ∞ ∈ s ∧ ∃ t : Set X, IsClosed t ∧ IsCompact t ∧ MapsTo (f ∘ (↑)) tᶜ s :=
tendsto_nhds_infty'.trans <| by
simp only [tendsto_pure_left, hasBasis_coclosedCompact.tendsto_left_iff, forall_and,
and_assoc, exists_prop]
#align alexandroff.tendsto_nhds_infty OnePoint.tendsto_nhds_infty
theorem continuousAt_infty' {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : OnePoint X → Y} :
ContinuousAt f ∞ ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑)) (coclosedCompact X) (𝓝 (f ∞)) :=
tendsto_nhds_infty'.trans <| and_iff_right (tendsto_pure_nhds _ _)
#align alexandroff.continuous_at_infty' OnePoint.continuousAt_infty'
theorem continuousAt_infty {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : OnePoint X → Y} :
ContinuousAt f ∞ ↔
∀ s ∈ 𝓝 (f ∞), ∃ t : Set X, IsClosed t ∧ IsCompact t ∧ MapsTo (f ∘ (↑)) tᶜ s :=
continuousAt_infty'.trans <| by simp only [hasBasis_coclosedCompact.tendsto_left_iff, and_assoc]
#align alexandroff.continuous_at_infty OnePoint.continuousAt_infty
theorem continuousAt_coe {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : OnePoint X → Y} {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑)) x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, nhds_coe_eq, tendsto_map'_iff, ContinuousAt]; rfl
#align alexandroff.continuous_at_coe OnePoint.continuousAt_coe
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactification/OnePoint.lean | 388 | 390 | theorem denseRange_coe [NoncompactSpace X] : DenseRange ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) := by |
rw [DenseRange, ← compl_infty]
exact dense_compl_singleton _
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Combination
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
open Finset Set
variable {ι 𝕜 E : Type*} [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {f : ι → E}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Radon.lean | 26 | 50 | theorem radon_partition (h : ¬ AffineIndependent 𝕜 f) :
∃ I, (convexHull 𝕜 (f '' I) ∩ convexHull 𝕜 (f '' Iᶜ)).Nonempty := by |
rw [affineIndependent_iff] at h
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨s, w, h_wsum, h_vsum, nonzero_w_index, h1, h2⟩ := h
let I : Finset ι := s.filter fun i ↦ 0 ≤ w i
let J : Finset ι := s.filter fun i ↦ w i < 0
let p : E := centerMass I w f -- point of intersection
have hJI : ∑ j ∈ J, w j + ∑ i ∈ I, w i = 0 := by
simpa only [h_wsum, not_lt] using sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not s (fun i ↦ w i < 0) w
have hI : 0 < ∑ i ∈ I, w i := by
rcases exists_pos_of_sum_zero_of_exists_nonzero _ h_wsum ⟨nonzero_w_index, h1, h2⟩
with ⟨pos_w_index, h1', h2'⟩
exact sum_pos' (fun _i hi ↦ (mem_filter.1 hi).2)
⟨pos_w_index, by simp only [I, mem_filter, h1', h2'.le, and_self, h2']⟩
have hp : centerMass J w f = p := Finset.centerMass_of_sum_add_sum_eq_zero hJI <| by
simpa only [← h_vsum, not_lt] using sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not s (fun i ↦ w i < 0) _
refine ⟨I, p, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact centerMass_mem_convexHull _ (fun _i hi ↦ (mem_filter.mp hi).2) hI
(fun _i hi ↦ Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
rw [← hp]
refine centerMass_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos _ (fun _ hi ↦ (mem_filter.mp hi).2.le) ?_
(fun _i hi ↦ Set.mem_image_of_mem _ fun hi' ↦ ?_)
· linarith only [hI, hJI]
· exact (mem_filter.mp hi').2.not_lt (mem_filter.mp hi).2
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fec1d95fc61c750c1ddbb5b1f7f48b8e811a80d7"
noncomputable section
universe v u u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
inductive WalkingPair : Type
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair
open WalkingPair
def WalkingPair.swap : WalkingPair ≃ WalkingPair where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
invFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_left : WalkingPair.swap left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_right : WalkingPair.swap right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt : WalkingPair.swap.symm left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff : WalkingPair.swap.symm right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff
def WalkingPair.equivBool : WalkingPair ≃ Bool where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j true false
-- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
invFun b := Bool.recOn b right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv b := by cases b; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left : WalkingPair.equivBool left = true :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right : WalkingPair.equivBool right = false :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm true = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm false = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false
variable {C : Type u}
def pairFunction (X Y : C) : WalkingPair → C := fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_left (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_left
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_right (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y right = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_right
variable [Category.{v} C]
def pair (X Y : C) : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C :=
Discrete.functor fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair CategoryTheory.Limits.pair
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨left⟩ = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_left
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨right⟩ = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_right
section
variable {F G : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨left⟩)
(g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨right⟩)
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
def mapPair : F ⟶ G where
app j := Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
naturality := fun ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_left : (mapPair f g).app ⟨left⟩ = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_left CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_left
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_right : (mapPair f g).app ⟨right⟩ = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_right CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_right
@[simps!]
def mapPairIso (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨left⟩) (g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨right⟩) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g)
(fun ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPairIso
end
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoPair (F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) :=
mapPairIso (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoPair
section
variable {D : Type u} [Category.{v} D]
def pairComp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagramIsoPair _
#align category_theory.limits.pair_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pairComp
end
abbrev BinaryFan (X Y : C) :=
Cone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan
abbrev BinaryFan.fst {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.fst
abbrev BinaryFan.snd {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.fst :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.snd :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_right
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y)
(lift : ∀ {T : C} (_ : T ⟶ X) (_ : T ⟶ Y), T ⟶ s.pt)
(hl₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.fst = f)
(hl₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.snd = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (m : T ⟶ s.pt) (_ : m ≫ s.fst = f) (_ : m ≫ s.snd = g),
m = lift f g) :
IsLimit s :=
Limits.IsLimit.mk (fun t => lift (BinaryFan.fst t) (BinaryFan.snd t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hl₁ _ _
· exact hl₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk
theorem BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) {f g : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext
abbrev BinaryCofan (X Y : C) := Cocone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan
abbrev BinaryCofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inl
abbrev BinaryCofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inr
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_right
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y)
(desc : ∀ {T : C} (_ : X ⟶ T) (_ : Y ⟶ T), s.pt ⟶ T)
(hd₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inl ≫ desc f g = f)
(hd₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inr ≫ desc f g = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (m : s.pt ⟶ T) (_ : s.inl ≫ m = f) (_ : s.inr ≫ m = g),
m = desc f g) :
IsColimit s :=
Limits.IsColimit.mk (fun t => desc (BinaryCofan.inl t) (BinaryCofan.inr t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hd₁ _ _
· exact hd₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk
theorem BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s)
{f g : s.pt ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext
variable {X Y : C}
section
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
@[simps pt]
def BinaryFan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : BinaryFan X Y where
pt := P
π :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk
@[simps pt]
def BinaryCofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : BinaryCofan X Y where
pt := P
ι :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_fst {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).fst = π₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_snd {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).snd = π₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inl {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inl = ι₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inr {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inr = ι₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inr
def isoBinaryFanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryFan.mk c.fst c.snd :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_fan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryFanMk
def isoBinaryCofanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryCofan.mk c.inl c.inr :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_cofan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryCofanMk
def BinaryFan.isLimitMk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (lift : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryFan X Y) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk fst snd) :=
{ lift := lift
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitMk
def BinaryCofan.isColimitMk {W : C} {inl : X ⟶ W} {inr : Y ⟶ W}
(desc : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryCofan X Y) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk inl inr) :=
{ desc := desc
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
@[simps]
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g } :=
⟨h.lift <| BinaryFan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift'
@[simps]
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨h.desc <| BinaryCofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc'
def BinaryFan.isLimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryFan X Y} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => hc.lift (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitFlip
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal Y) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.fst := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' H (𝟙 X) (h.from X)
exact
⟨⟨l,
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext H (by simpa [hl, -Category.comp_id] using Category.comp_id _)
(h.hom_ext _ _),
hl⟩⟩
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f _ => f ≫ inv c.fst) (fun _ _ => by simp)
(fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ => by simp [← e]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal X) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.snd := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst h (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some).ofIsoLimit (isoBinaryFanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : X ⟶ X')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (c.fst ≫ f) c.snd) := by
fapply BinaryFan.isLimitMk
· exact fun s => h.lift (BinaryFan.mk (s.fst ≫ inv f) s.snd)
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [Category.comp_id,BinaryFan.π_app_left,IsIso.inv_hom_id,
BinaryFan.mk_fst,IsLimit.fac_assoc,eq_self_iff_true,Category.assoc]
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,eq_self_iff_true,IsLimit.fac]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: simpa timed out here also
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext h
· simpa only
[BinaryFan.π_app_left,BinaryFan.mk_fst,Category.assoc,IsLimit.fac,IsIso.eq_comp_inv]
· simpa only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,IsLimit.fac]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : Y ⟶ Y')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.fst (c.snd ≫ f)) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitFlip <| BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso
def BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial Y) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inl := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' H (𝟙 X) (h.to X)
refine ⟨⟨l, hl, BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext H (?_) (h.hom_ext _ _)⟩⟩
rw [Category.comp_id]
have e : (inl c ≫ l) ≫ inl c = 𝟙 X ≫ inl c := congrArg (·≫inl c) hl
rwa [Category.assoc,Category.id_comp] at e
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f _ => inv c.inl ≫ f)
(fun _ _ => IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc _ _) (fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ =>
(IsIso.eq_inv_comp _).mpr e⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial X) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inr := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl h (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some).ofIsoColimit (isoBinaryCofanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : X' ⟶ X)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (f ≫ c.inl) c.inr) := by
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s => h.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (inv f ≫ s.inl) s.inr)
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
apply BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext h
· rw [← cancel_epi f]
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc] using e₁
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
· simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : Y' ⟶ Y)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inl (f ≫ c.inr)) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip <| BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso
abbrev HasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) :=
HasLimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_product CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryProduct
abbrev HasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) :=
HasColimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryCoproduct
abbrev prod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :=
limit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prod
abbrev coprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :=
colimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod
notation:20 X " ⨯ " Y:20 => prod X Y
notation:20 X " ⨿ " Y:20 => coprod X Y
abbrev prod.fst {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.fst
abbrev prod.snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.snd
abbrev coprod.inl {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl
abbrev coprod.inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr
def prodIsProd (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) prod.snd) :=
(limit.isLimit _).ofIsoLimit (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
))
#align category_theory.limits.prod_is_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prodIsProd
def coprodIsCoprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) coprod.inr) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).ofIsoColimit (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
))
#align category_theory.limits.coprod_is_coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprodIsCoprod
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] {f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y}
(h₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext (limit.isLimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.prod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.hom_ext
@[ext 1100]
theorem coprod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] {f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W}
(h₁ : coprod.inl ≫ f = coprod.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : coprod.inr ≫ f = coprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (colimit.isColimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.hom_ext
abbrev prod.lift {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y :=
limit.lift _ (BinaryFan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift
abbrev diag (X : C) [HasBinaryProduct X X] : X ⟶ X ⨯ X :=
prod.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.diag CategoryTheory.Limits.diag
abbrev coprod.desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (BinaryCofan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc
abbrev codiag (X : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] : X ⨿ X ⟶ X :=
coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.codiag
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.fst = f :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.snd = g :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc f g = f :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc f g = g :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono f] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono g] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_snd _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi f] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inl_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi g] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inr_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right
def prod.lift' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
{ l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y // l ≫ prod.fst = f ∧ l ≫ prod.snd = g } :=
⟨prod.lift f g, prod.lift_fst _ _, prod.lift_snd _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift'
def coprod.desc' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
{ l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W // coprod.inl ≫ l = f ∧ coprod.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨coprod.desc f g, coprod.inl_desc _ _, coprod.inr_desc _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc'
def prod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z :=
limMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map
def coprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z :=
colimMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map
section CoprodLemmas
-- @[reassoc (attr := simp)]
@[simp] -- Porting note: removing reassoc tag since result is not hygienic (two h's)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/BinaryProducts.lean | 837 | 839 | theorem coprod.desc_comp {V W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : X ⟶ V)
(h : Y ⟶ V) : coprod.desc g h ≫ f = coprod.desc (g ≫ f) (h ≫ f) := by |
ext <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
#align_import data.list.prod_sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dd71334db81d0bd444af1ee339a29298bef40734"
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
@[simp]
theorem nil_product (l : List β) : (@nil α) ×ˢ l = [] :=
rfl
#align list.nil_product List.nil_product
@[simp]
theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
(a :: l₁) ×ˢ l₂ = map (fun b => (a, b)) l₂ ++ (l₁ ×ˢ l₂) :=
rfl
#align list.product_cons List.product_cons
@[simp]
theorem product_nil : ∀ l : List α, l ×ˢ (@nil β) = []
| [] => rfl
| _ :: l => by simp [product_cons, product_nil l]
#align list.product_nil List.product_nil
@[simp]
theorem mem_product {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ := by
simp_all [SProd.sprod, product, mem_bind, mem_map, Prod.ext_iff, exists_prop, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
#align list.mem_product List.mem_product
| Mathlib/Data/List/ProdSigma.lean | 51 | 56 | theorem length_product (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
length (l₁ ×ˢ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ := by |
induction' l₁ with x l₁ IH
· exact (Nat.zero_mul _).symm
· simp only [length, product_cons, length_append, IH, Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul, length_map,
Nat.add_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
#align_import topology.uniform_space.equicontinuity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y Z α α' β β' γ 𝓕 : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[tZ : TopologicalSpace Z] [uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
#align equicontinuous_at EquicontinuousAt
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
#align set.equicontinuous_at Set.EquicontinuousAt
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
#align equicontinuous Equicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
#align set.equicontinuous Set.Equicontinuous
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
#align uniform_equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous Set.UniformEquicontinuous
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prod_map, ← map_comap]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prod_mk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_pair equicontinuousAt_iff_pair
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
#align uniform_equicontinuous.equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
#align equicontinuous_at.continuous_at EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous_at.continuous_at_of_mem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
#align equicontinuous.continuous Equicontinuous.continuous
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous_of_mem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align equicontinuous_at.comp EquicontinuousAt.comp
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous_at.mono Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
#align equicontinuous.comp Equicontinuous.comp
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous.mono Set.Equicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.comp UniformEquicontinuous.comp
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.mono Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_range equicontinuousAt_iff_range
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
#align equicontinuous_iff_range equicontinuous_iff_range
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
#align uniform_equicontinuous_at_iff_range uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_continuous_at equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
#align equicontinuous_iff_continuous equicontinuous_iff_continuous
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align uniform_equicontinuous_iff_uniform_continuous uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 583 | 586 | theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by |
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.zmod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74ad1c88c77e799d2fea62801d1dbbd698cff1b7"
assert_not_exists Submodule
open Function
namespace ZMod
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
#align zmod.val ZMod.val
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
#align zmod.val_lt ZMod.val_lt
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
#align zmod.val_le ZMod.val_le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
#align zmod.val_zero ZMod.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
#align zmod.val_one' ZMod.val_one'
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
#align zmod.val_neg' ZMod.val_neg'
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
#align zmod.val_mul' ZMod.val_mul'
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_ofNat a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
#align zmod.val_nat_cast ZMod.val_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
theorem val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast_of_lt := val_natCast_of_lt
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff' := by
intro k
cases' n with n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
#align zmod.add_order_of_one ZMod.addOrderOf_one
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
cases' a with a
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe ZMod.addOrderOf_coe
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe' ZMod.addOrderOf_coe'
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 137 | 139 | theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by |
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Fin2
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.typevec from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
universe u v w
@[pp_with_univ]
def TypeVec (n : ℕ) :=
Fin2 n → Type*
#align typevec TypeVec
instance {n} : Inhabited (TypeVec.{u} n) :=
⟨fun _ => PUnit⟩
namespace TypeVec
variable {n : ℕ}
def Arrow (α β : TypeVec n) :=
∀ i : Fin2 n, α i → β i
#align typevec.arrow TypeVec.Arrow
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixl:40 " ⟹ " => TypeVec.Arrow
open MvFunctor
@[ext]
theorem Arrow.ext {α β : TypeVec n} (f g : α ⟹ β) :
(∀ i, f i = g i) → f = g := by
intro h; funext i; apply h
instance Arrow.inhabited (α β : TypeVec n) [∀ i, Inhabited (β i)] : Inhabited (α ⟹ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => default⟩
#align typevec.arrow.inhabited TypeVec.Arrow.inhabited
def id {α : TypeVec n} : α ⟹ α := fun _ x => x
#align typevec.id TypeVec.id
def comp {α β γ : TypeVec n} (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) : α ⟹ γ := fun i x => g i (f i x)
#align typevec.comp TypeVec.comp
@[inherit_doc] scoped[MvFunctor] infixr:80 " ⊚ " => TypeVec.comp -- type as \oo
@[simp]
theorem id_comp {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : id ⊚ f = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.id_comp TypeVec.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_id {α β : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) : f ⊚ id = f :=
rfl
#align typevec.comp_id TypeVec.comp_id
theorem comp_assoc {α β γ δ : TypeVec n} (h : γ ⟹ δ) (g : β ⟹ γ) (f : α ⟹ β) :
(h ⊚ g) ⊚ f = h ⊚ g ⊚ f :=
rfl
#align typevec.comp_assoc TypeVec.comp_assoc
def append1 (α : TypeVec n) (β : Type*) : TypeVec (n + 1)
| Fin2.fs i => α i
| Fin2.fz => β
#align typevec.append1 TypeVec.append1
@[inherit_doc] infixl:67 " ::: " => append1
def drop (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : TypeVec n := fun i => α i.fs
#align typevec.drop TypeVec.drop
def last (α : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1)) : Type _ :=
α Fin2.fz
#align typevec.last TypeVec.last
instance last.inhabited (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) [Inhabited (α Fin2.fz)] : Inhabited (last α) :=
⟨show α Fin2.fz from default⟩
#align typevec.last.inhabited TypeVec.last.inhabited
theorem drop_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} {i : Fin2 n} : drop (append1 α β) i = α i :=
rfl
#align typevec.drop_append1 TypeVec.drop_append1
theorem drop_append1' {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : drop (append1 α β) = α :=
funext fun _ => drop_append1
#align typevec.drop_append1' TypeVec.drop_append1'
theorem last_append1 {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type*} : last (append1 α β) = β :=
rfl
#align typevec.last_append1 TypeVec.last_append1
@[simp]
theorem append1_drop_last (α : TypeVec (n + 1)) : append1 (drop α) (last α) = α :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
#align typevec.append1_drop_last TypeVec.append1_drop_last
@[elab_as_elim]
def append1Cases {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (γ) : C γ := by
rw [← @append1_drop_last _ γ]; apply H
#align typevec.append1_cases TypeVec.append1Cases
@[simp]
theorem append1_cases_append1 {C : TypeVec (n + 1) → Sort u} (H : ∀ α β, C (append1 α β)) (α β) :
@append1Cases _ C H (append1 α β) = H α β :=
rfl
#align typevec.append1_cases_append1 TypeVec.append1_cases_append1
def splitFun {α α' : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : drop α ⟹ drop α') (g : last α → last α') : α ⟹ α'
| Fin2.fs i => f i
| Fin2.fz => g
#align typevec.split_fun TypeVec.splitFun
def appendFun {α α' : TypeVec n} {β β' : Type*} (f : α ⟹ α') (g : β → β') :
append1 α β ⟹ append1 α' β' :=
splitFun f g
#align typevec.append_fun TypeVec.appendFun
@[inherit_doc] infixl:0 " ::: " => appendFun
def dropFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : drop α ⟹ drop β := fun i => f i.fs
#align typevec.drop_fun TypeVec.dropFun
def lastFun {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} (f : α ⟹ β) : last α → last β :=
f Fin2.fz
#align typevec.last_fun TypeVec.lastFun
-- Porting note: Lean wasn't able to infer the motive in term mode
def nilFun {α : TypeVec 0} {β : TypeVec 0} : α ⟹ β := fun i => by apply Fin2.elim0 i
#align typevec.nil_fun TypeVec.nilFun
| Mathlib/Data/TypeVec.lean | 171 | 177 | theorem eq_of_drop_last_eq {α β : TypeVec (n + 1)} {f g : α ⟹ β} (h₀ : dropFun f = dropFun g)
(h₁ : lastFun f = lastFun g) : f = g := by |
-- Porting note: FIXME: congr_fun h₀ <;> ext1 ⟨⟩ <;> apply_assumption
refine funext (fun x => ?_)
cases x
· apply h₁
· apply congr_fun h₀
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 329 | 332 | theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by |
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.calculus.diff_cont_on_cl from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
open Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E F G : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {f g : E → F} {s t : Set E} {x : E}
structure DiffContOnCl (f : E → F) (s : Set E) : Prop where
protected differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s
protected continuousOn : ContinuousOn f (closure s)
#align diff_cont_on_cl DiffContOnCl
variable {𝕜}
theorem DifferentiableOn.diffContOnCl (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f (closure s)) : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 f s :=
⟨h.mono subset_closure, h.continuousOn⟩
#align differentiable_on.diff_cont_on_cl DifferentiableOn.diffContOnCl
theorem Differentiable.diffContOnCl (h : Differentiable 𝕜 f) : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 f s :=
⟨h.differentiableOn, h.continuous.continuousOn⟩
#align differentiable.diff_cont_on_cl Differentiable.diffContOnCl
theorem IsClosed.diffContOnCl_iff (hs : IsClosed s) : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 f s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
⟨fun h => h.differentiableOn, fun h => ⟨h, hs.closure_eq.symm ▸ h.continuousOn⟩⟩
#align is_closed.diff_cont_on_cl_iff IsClosed.diffContOnCl_iff
theorem diffContOnCl_univ : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 f univ ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
isClosed_univ.diffContOnCl_iff.trans differentiableOn_univ
#align diff_cont_on_cl_univ diffContOnCl_univ
theorem diffContOnCl_const {c : F} : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 (fun _ : E => c) s :=
⟨differentiableOn_const c, continuousOn_const⟩
#align diff_cont_on_cl_const diffContOnCl_const
namespace DiffContOnCl
theorem comp {g : G → E} {t : Set G} (hf : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 f s) (hg : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 g t)
(h : MapsTo g t s) : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 (f ∘ g) t :=
⟨hf.1.comp hg.1 h, hf.2.comp hg.2 <| h.closure_of_continuousOn hg.2⟩
#align diff_cont_on_cl.comp DiffContOnCl.comp
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/DiffContOnCl.lean | 64 | 70 | theorem continuousOn_ball [NormedSpace ℝ E] {x : E} {r : ℝ} (h : DiffContOnCl 𝕜 f (ball x r)) :
ContinuousOn f (closedBall x r) := by |
rcases eq_or_ne r 0 with (rfl | hr)
· rw [closedBall_zero]
exact continuousOn_singleton f x
· rw [← closure_ball x hr]
exact h.continuousOn
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
#align_import analysis.ODE.gronwall from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Metric Set Asymptotics Filter Real
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal
noncomputable def gronwallBound (δ K ε x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if K = 0 then δ + ε * x else δ * exp (K * x) + ε / K * (exp (K * x) - 1)
#align gronwall_bound gronwallBound
theorem gronwallBound_K0 (δ ε : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ 0 ε = fun x => δ + ε * x :=
funext fun _ => if_pos rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gronwall_bound_K0 gronwallBound_K0
theorem gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 {δ K ε : ℝ} (hK : K ≠ 0) :
gronwallBound δ K ε = fun x => δ * exp (K * x) + ε / K * (exp (K * x) - 1) :=
funext fun _ => if_neg hK
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align gronwall_bound_of_K_ne_0 gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0
theorem hasDerivAt_gronwallBound (δ K ε x : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (gronwallBound δ K ε) (K * gronwallBound δ K ε x + ε) x := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· subst K
simp only [gronwallBound_K0, zero_mul, zero_add]
convert ((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul ε).const_add δ
rw [mul_one]
· simp only [gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 hK]
convert (((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul K).exp.const_mul δ).add
((((hasDerivAt_id x).const_mul K).exp.sub_const 1).const_mul (ε / K)) using 1
simp only [id, mul_add, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_comm _ K, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hK]
ring
#align has_deriv_at_gronwall_bound hasDerivAt_gronwallBound
theorem hasDerivAt_gronwallBound_shift (δ K ε x a : ℝ) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => gronwallBound δ K ε (y - a)) (K * gronwallBound δ K ε (x - a) + ε) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_gronwallBound δ K ε _).comp x ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub_const a) using 1
rw [id, mul_one]
#align has_deriv_at_gronwall_bound_shift hasDerivAt_gronwallBound_shift
theorem gronwallBound_x0 (δ K ε : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ K ε 0 = δ := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· simp only [gronwallBound, if_pos hK, mul_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [gronwallBound, if_neg hK, mul_zero, exp_zero, sub_self, mul_one,
add_zero]
#align gronwall_bound_x0 gronwallBound_x0
theorem gronwallBound_ε0 (δ K x : ℝ) : gronwallBound δ K 0 x = δ * exp (K * x) := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· simp only [gronwallBound_K0, hK, zero_mul, exp_zero, add_zero, mul_one]
· simp only [gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 hK, zero_div, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align gronwall_bound_ε0 gronwallBound_ε0
theorem gronwallBound_ε0_δ0 (K x : ℝ) : gronwallBound 0 K 0 x = 0 := by
simp only [gronwallBound_ε0, zero_mul]
#align gronwall_bound_ε0_δ0 gronwallBound_ε0_δ0
theorem gronwallBound_continuous_ε (δ K x : ℝ) : Continuous fun ε => gronwallBound δ K ε x := by
by_cases hK : K = 0
· simp only [gronwallBound_K0, hK]
exact continuous_const.add (continuous_id.mul continuous_const)
· simp only [gronwallBound_of_K_ne_0 hK]
exact continuous_const.add ((continuous_id.mul continuous_const).mul continuous_const)
#align gronwall_bound_continuous_ε gronwallBound_continuous_ε
theorem le_gronwallBound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {δ K ε : ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, (z - x)⁻¹ * (f z - f x) < r)
(ha : f a ≤ δ) (bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f' x ≤ K * f x + ε) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x ≤ gronwallBound δ K ε (x - a) := by
have H : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∀ ε' ∈ Ioi ε, f x ≤ gronwallBound δ K ε' (x - a) := by
intro x hx ε' hε'
apply image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary hf hf'
· rwa [sub_self, gronwallBound_x0]
· exact fun x => hasDerivAt_gronwallBound_shift δ K ε' x a
· intro x hx hfB
rw [← hfB]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (bound x hx)
exact add_lt_add_left (mem_Ioi.1 hε') _
· exact hx
intro x hx
change f x ≤ (fun ε' => gronwallBound δ K ε' (x - a)) ε
convert continuousWithinAt_const.closure_le _ _ (H x hx)
· simp only [closure_Ioi, left_mem_Ici]
exact (gronwallBound_continuous_ε δ K (x - a)).continuousWithinAt
#align le_gronwall_bound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le le_gronwallBound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le
theorem norm_le_gronwallBound_of_norm_deriv_right_le {f f' : ℝ → E} {δ K ε : ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ δ) (bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ + ε) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x‖ ≤ gronwallBound δ K ε (x - a) :=
le_gronwallBound_of_liminf_deriv_right_le (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf)
(fun x hx _r hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le hr) ha bound
#align norm_le_gronwall_bound_of_norm_deriv_right_le norm_le_gronwallBound_of_norm_deriv_right_le
variable {v : ℝ → E → E} {s : ℝ → Set E} {K : ℝ≥0} {f g f' g' : ℝ → E} {a b t₀ : ℝ} {εf εg δ : ℝ}
(hv : ∀ t, LipschitzOnWith K (v t) (s t))
theorem dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' t) (Ici t) t)
(f_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (f' t) (v t (f t)) ≤ εf)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (g' t) (Ici t) t)
(g_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (g' t) (v t (g t)) ≤ εg)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, g t ∈ s t)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ gronwallBound δ K (εf + εg) (t - a) := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm] at ha ⊢
have h_deriv : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt (fun t => f t - g t) (f' t - g' t) (Ici t) t :=
fun t ht => (hf' t ht).sub (hg' t ht)
apply norm_le_gronwallBound_of_norm_deriv_right_le (hf.sub hg) h_deriv ha
intro t ht
have := dist_triangle4_right (f' t) (g' t) (v t (f t)) (v t (g t))
have hv := (hv t).dist_le_mul _ (hfs t ht) _ (hgs t ht)
rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm]
refine this.trans ((add_le_add (add_le_add (f_bound t ht) (g_bound t ht)) hv).trans ?_)
rw [add_comm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem
theorem dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE
(hv : ∀ t, LipschitzWith K (v t))
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' t) (Ici t) t)
(f_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (f' t) (v t (f t)) ≤ εf)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (g' t) (Ici t) t)
(g_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (g' t) (v t (g t)) ≤ εg)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ gronwallBound δ K (εf + εg) (t - a) :=
have hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ @univ E := fun _ _ => trivial
dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem (fun t => (hv t).lipschitzOnWith _) hf hf'
f_bound hfs hg hg' g_bound (fun _ _ => trivial) ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE
theorem dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b)) (hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, g t ∈ s t) (ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ δ * exp (K * (t - a)) := by
have f_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (v t (f t)) (v t (f t)) ≤ 0 := by intros; rw [dist_self]
have g_bound : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, dist (v t (g t)) (v t (g t)) ≤ 0 := by intros; rw [dist_self]
intro t ht
have :=
dist_le_of_approx_trajectories_ODE_of_mem hv hf hf' f_bound hfs hg hg' g_bound hgs ha t ht
rwa [zero_add, gronwallBound_ε0] at this
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem_set dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem
theorem dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE
(hv : ∀ t, LipschitzWith K (v t))
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(ha : dist (f a) (g a) ≤ δ) :
∀ t ∈ Icc a b, dist (f t) (g t) ≤ δ * exp (K * (t - a)) :=
have hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ @univ E := fun _ _ => trivial
dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem (fun t => (hv t).lipschitzOnWith _) hf hf' hfs hg
hg' (fun _ _ => trivial) ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE
theorem ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc_right
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (v t (f t)) (Ici t) t)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (v t (g t)) (Ici t) t)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ico a b, g t ∈ s t)
(ha : f a = g a) :
EqOn f g (Icc a b) := fun t ht ↦ by
have := dist_le_of_trajectories_ODE_of_mem hv hf hf' hfs hg hg' hgs (dist_le_zero.2 ha) t ht
rwa [zero_mul, dist_le_zero] at this
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_set ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc_right
theorem ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc_left
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ioc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (v t (f t)) (Iic t) t)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ioc a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ioc a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (v t (g t)) (Iic t) t)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ioc a b, g t ∈ s t)
(hb : f b = g b) :
EqOn f g (Icc a b) := by
have hv' t : LipschitzOnWith K (Neg.neg ∘ (v (-t))) (s (-t)) := by
rw [← one_mul K]
exact LipschitzWith.id.neg.comp_lipschitzOnWith (hv _)
have hmt1 : MapsTo Neg.neg (Icc (-b) (-a)) (Icc a b) :=
fun _ ht ↦ ⟨le_neg.mp ht.2, neg_le.mp ht.1⟩
have hmt2 : MapsTo Neg.neg (Ico (-b) (-a)) (Ioc a b) :=
fun _ ht ↦ ⟨lt_neg.mp ht.2, neg_le.mp ht.1⟩
have hmt3 (t : ℝ) : MapsTo Neg.neg (Ici t) (Iic (-t)) :=
fun _ ht' ↦ mem_Iic.mpr <| neg_le_neg ht'
suffices EqOn (f ∘ Neg.neg) (g ∘ Neg.neg) (Icc (-b) (-a)) by
rw [eqOn_comp_right_iff] at this
convert this
simp
apply ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc_right hv'
(hf.comp continuousOn_neg hmt1) _ (fun _ ht ↦ hfs _ (hmt2 ht))
(hg.comp continuousOn_neg hmt1) _ (fun _ ht ↦ hgs _ (hmt2 ht)) (by simp [hb])
· intros t ht
convert HasFDerivWithinAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt t (hf' (-t) (hmt2 ht))
(hasDerivAt_neg t).hasDerivWithinAt (hmt3 t)
simp
· intros t ht
convert HasFDerivWithinAt.comp_hasDerivWithinAt t (hg' (-t) (hmt2 ht))
(hasDerivAt_neg t).hasDerivWithinAt (hmt3 t)
simp
| Mathlib/Analysis/ODE/Gronwall.lean | 299 | 322 | theorem ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc
(ht : t₀ ∈ Ioo a b)
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hf' : ∀ t ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt f (v t (f t)) t)
(hfs : ∀ t ∈ Ioo a b, f t ∈ s t)
(hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b))
(hg' : ∀ t ∈ Ioo a b, HasDerivAt g (v t (g t)) t)
(hgs : ∀ t ∈ Ioo a b, g t ∈ s t)
(heq : f t₀ = g t₀) :
EqOn f g (Icc a b) := by |
rw [← Icc_union_Icc_eq_Icc (le_of_lt ht.1) (le_of_lt ht.2)]
apply EqOn.union
· have hss : Ioc a t₀ ⊆ Ioo a b := Ioc_subset_Ioo_right ht.2
exact ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc_left hv
(hf.mono <| Icc_subset_Icc_right <| le_of_lt ht.2)
(fun _ ht' ↦ (hf' _ (hss ht')).hasDerivWithinAt) (fun _ ht' ↦ (hfs _ (hss ht')))
(hg.mono <| Icc_subset_Icc_right <| le_of_lt ht.2)
(fun _ ht' ↦ (hg' _ (hss ht')).hasDerivWithinAt) (fun _ ht' ↦ (hgs _ (hss ht'))) heq
· have hss : Ico t₀ b ⊆ Ioo a b := Ico_subset_Ioo_left ht.1
exact ODE_solution_unique_of_mem_Icc_right hv
(hf.mono <| Icc_subset_Icc_left <| le_of_lt ht.1)
(fun _ ht' ↦ (hf' _ (hss ht')).hasDerivWithinAt) (fun _ ht' ↦ (hfs _ (hss ht')))
(hg.mono <| Icc_subset_Icc_left <| le_of_lt ht.1)
(fun _ ht' ↦ (hg' _ (hss ht')).hasDerivWithinAt) (fun _ ht' ↦ (hgs _ (hss ht'))) heq
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
#align_import topology.category.Top.limits.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
-- Porting note: every ML3 decl has an uppercase letter
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
abbrev pullbackFst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ X :=
⟨Prod.fst ∘ Subtype.val, by
apply Continuous.comp <;> set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in continuity⟩
#align Top.pullback_fst TopCat.pullbackFst
lemma pullbackFst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackFst f g x = x.1.1 := rfl
abbrev pullbackSnd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ Y :=
⟨Prod.snd ∘ Subtype.val, by
apply Continuous.comp <;> set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in continuity⟩
#align Top.pullback_snd TopCat.pullbackSnd
lemma pullbackSnd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackSnd f g x = x.1.2 := rfl
def pullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackFst f g) (pullbackSnd f g)
(by
dsimp [pullbackFst, pullbackSnd, Function.comp_def]
ext ⟨x, h⟩
-- Next 2 lines were
-- `rw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk, comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]`
-- `exact h` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply]
congr!)
#align Top.pullback_cone TopCat.pullbackCone
def pullbackConeIsLimit (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : IsLimit (pullbackCone f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _
(by
intro S
constructor; swap
· exact
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨S.fst x, S.snd x⟩, by simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom S.condition x⟩
continuous_toFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk <| Continuous.prod_mk ?_ ?_
· exact (PullbackCone.fst S)|>.continuous_toFun
· exact (PullbackCone.snd S)|>.continuous_toFun
}
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
· intro m h₁ h₂
-- Porting note: used to be ext x
apply ContinuousMap.ext; intro x
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₂ x)
#align Top.pullback_cone_is_limit TopCat.pullbackConeIsLimit
def pullbackIsoProdSubtype (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
pullback f g ≅ TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackConeIsLimit f g)
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullbackFst f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_fst TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).fst :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst f g) x
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_fst_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = pullbackSnd f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_snd TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
(pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).snd :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd f g) x
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_snd_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackFst f g = pullback.fst := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_fst TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackSnd f g = pullback.snd := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_snd TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd
-- Porting note: why do I need to tell Lean to coerce pullback to a type
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(x : ConcreteCategory.forget.obj (pullback f g)) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom x =
⟨⟨(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) x, (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) x⟩, by
simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition x⟩ := by
apply Subtype.ext; apply Prod.ext
exacts [ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst f g) x,
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd f g) x]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply
theorem pullback_topology {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullback f g).str =
induced (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) X.str ⊓
induced (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g)
refine homeo.inducing.induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (induced _ ( (induced Prod.fst X.str) ⊓ (induced Prod.snd Y.str))) = _
simp only [induced_compose, induced_inf]
congr
#align Top.pullback_topology TopCat.pullback_topology
theorem range_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) =
{ x | (Limits.prod.fst ≫ f) x = (Limits.prod.snd ≫ g) x } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
change (_ ≫ _ ≫ f) _ = (_ ≫ _ ≫ g) _ -- new `change` after #13170
simp [pullback.condition]
· rintro (h : f (_, _).1 = g (_, _).2)
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h⟩
change (forget TopCat).map _ _ = _ -- new `change` after #13170
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, limit.lift_π] <;> -- now `erw` after #13170
-- This used to be `simp` before leanprover/lean4#2644
aesop_cat
#align Top.range_pullback_to_prod TopCat.range_pullback_to_prod
noncomputable
def pullbackHomeoPreimage
{X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
(f : X → Z) (hf : Continuous f) (g : Y → Z) (hg : Embedding g) :
{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ≃ₜ f ⁻¹' Set.range g where
toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x.1.1, _, x.2.symm⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x.1, Exists.choose x.2⟩, (Exists.choose_spec x.2).symm⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext <;> dsimp
apply hg.inj
convert x.prop
exact Exists.choose_spec (p := fun y ↦ g y = f (↑x : X × Y).1) _
right_inv := fun x ↦ rfl
continuous_toFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
exact continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
refine continuous_prod_mk.mpr ⟨continuous_subtype_val, hg.toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr ?_⟩
convert hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
ext x
exact Exists.choose_spec x.2
theorem inducing_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Inducing <| ⇑(prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) :=
⟨by simp [topologicalSpace_coe, prod_topology, pullback_topology, induced_compose, ← coe_comp]⟩
#align Top.inducing_pullback_to_prod TopCat.inducing_pullback_to_prod
theorem embedding_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Embedding <| ⇑(prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) :=
⟨inducing_pullback_to_prod f g, (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
#align Top.embedding_pullback_to_prod TopCat.embedding_pullback_to_prod
theorem range_pullback_map {W X Y Z S T : TopCat} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Set.range (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) =
(pullback.fst : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range i₁ ∩
(pullback.snd : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range i₂ := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range]
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, comp_apply]
exact ⟨exists_apply_eq_apply _ _, exists_apply_eq_apply _ _⟩
rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
have : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂ := by
apply (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp H₃
erw [← comp_apply, eq₁, ← comp_apply, eq₂, -- now `erw` after #13170
comp_apply, comp_apply, hx₁, hx₂, ← comp_apply, pullback.condition]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f₁ f₂).inv ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, this⟩
change (forget TopCat).map _ _ = _
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;>
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
simp only [Category.assoc, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one]
· simp only [cospan_one, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [pullbackFst_apply, hx₁]
rw [← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl, comp_apply (g := g₁)]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
· simp only [cospan_left, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [hx₁] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
· simp only [cospan_right, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [hx₂] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
#align Top.range_pullback_map TopCat.range_pullback_map
theorem pullback_fst_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) = { x : X | ∃ y : Y, f x = g y } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨(y : (forget TopCat).obj _), rfl⟩
use (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) y
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition y
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
#align Top.pullback_fst_range TopCat.pullback_fst_range
theorem pullback_snd_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) = { y : Y | ∃ x : X, f x = g y } := by
ext y
constructor
· rintro ⟨(x : (forget TopCat).obj _), rfl⟩
use (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) x
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition x
· rintro ⟨x, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
#align Top.pullback_snd_range TopCat.pullback_snd_range
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Pullbacks.lean | 284 | 297 | theorem pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings {W X Y Z S T : TopCat.{u}} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S)
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) {i₁ : W ⟶ Y} {i₂ : X ⟶ Z} (H₁ : Embedding i₁) (H₂ : Embedding i₂)
(i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Embedding (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by |
refine
embedding_of_embedding_compose (ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
(show Continuous (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ Y ⨯ Z) from
ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
?_
suffices
Embedding (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd ≫ Limits.prod.map i₁ i₂ : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _) by
simpa [← coe_comp] using this
rw [coe_comp]
exact Embedding.comp (embedding_prod_map H₁ H₂) (embedding_pullback_to_prod _ _)
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.restrict
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst : Limits.pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map pullback.snd.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.pullback_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.presieve.pullback_compatible_iff CategoryTheory.Presieve.pullbackCompatible_iff
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 186 | 191 | theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by |
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
|
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
#align_import probability.cond_count from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"117e93f82b5f959f8193857370109935291f0cc4"
noncomputable section
open ProbabilityTheory
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
def condCount (s : Set Ω) : Measure Ω :=
Measure.count[|s]
#align probability_theory.cond_count ProbabilityTheory.condCount
@[simp]
theorem condCount_empty_meas : (condCount ∅ : Measure Ω) = 0 := by simp [condCount]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_empty_meas ProbabilityTheory.condCount_empty_meas
theorem condCount_empty {s : Set Ω} : condCount s ∅ = 0 := by simp
#align probability_theory.cond_count_empty ProbabilityTheory.condCount_empty
theorem finite_of_condCount_ne_zero {s t : Set Ω} (h : condCount s t ≠ 0) : s.Finite := by
by_contra hs'
simp [condCount, cond, Measure.count_apply_infinite hs'] at h
#align probability_theory.finite_of_cond_count_ne_zero ProbabilityTheory.finite_of_condCount_ne_zero
theorem condCount_univ [Fintype Ω] {s : Set Ω} :
condCount Set.univ s = Measure.count s / Fintype.card Ω := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, ← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, Set.univ_inter]
congr
rw [← Finset.coe_univ, Measure.count_apply, Finset.univ.tsum_subtype' fun _ => (1 : ENNReal)]
· simp [Finset.card_univ]
· exact (@Finset.coe_univ Ω _).symm ▸ MeasurableSet.univ
#align probability_theory.cond_count_univ ProbabilityTheory.condCount_univ
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass Ω]
theorem condCount_isProbabilityMeasure {s : Set Ω} (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (condCount s) :=
{ measure_univ := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, Set.inter_univ, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel]
· exact fun h => hs'.ne_empty <| Measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero h
· exact (Measure.count_apply_lt_top.2 hs).ne }
#align probability_theory.cond_count_is_probability_measure ProbabilityTheory.condCount_isProbabilityMeasure
theorem condCount_singleton (ω : Ω) (t : Set Ω) [Decidable (ω ∈ t)] :
condCount {ω} t = if ω ∈ t then 1 else 0 := by
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ (measurableSet_singleton ω), Measure.count_singleton, inv_one,
one_mul]
split_ifs
· rw [(by simpa : ({ω} : Set Ω) ∩ t = {ω}), Measure.count_singleton]
· rw [(by simpa : ({ω} : Set Ω) ∩ t = ∅), Measure.count_empty]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_singleton ProbabilityTheory.condCount_singleton
variable {s t u : Set Ω}
theorem condCount_inter_self (hs : s.Finite) : condCount s (s ∩ t) = condCount s t := by
rw [condCount, cond_inter_self _ hs.measurableSet]
#align probability_theory.cond_count_inter_self ProbabilityTheory.condCount_inter_self
| Mathlib/Probability/CondCount.lean | 104 | 107 | theorem condCount_self (hs : s.Finite) (hs' : s.Nonempty) : condCount s s = 1 := by |
rw [condCount, cond_apply _ hs.measurableSet, Set.inter_self, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel]
· exact fun h => hs'.ne_empty <| Measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero h
· exact (Measure.count_apply_lt_top.2 hs).ne
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.nhds_set from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Filter Topology
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Filter X}
{s t s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set X} {x : X}
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal (X) [TopologicalSpace (X × X)] :
𝓝ˢ (diagonal X) = ⨆ (x : X), 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhdsSet, ← range_diag, ← range_comp]
rfl
#align nhds_set_diagonal nhdsSet_diagonal
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∀ x : X, x ∈ t → s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [nhdsSet, Filter.mem_sSup, forall_mem_image]
#align mem_nhds_set_iff_forall mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall
lemma nhdsSet_le : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ f ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ f := by simp [nhdsSet]
theorem bUnion_mem_nhdsSet {t : X → Set X} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ∈ 𝓝 x) : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => mem_of_superset (h x hx) <|
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun x _ => t x) x hx -- Porting note: fails to find `s`
#align bUnion_mem_nhds_set bUnion_mem_nhdsSet
theorem subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet : s ⊆ interior t ↔ t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall, subset_interior_iff_nhds]
#align subset_interior_iff_mem_nhds_set subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet
theorem disjoint_principal_nhdsSet : Disjoint (𝓟 s) (𝓝ˢ t) ↔ Disjoint (closure s) t := by
rw [disjoint_principal_left, ← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, interior_compl,
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_principal : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓟 t) ↔ Disjoint s (closure t) := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_principal_nhdsSet, disjoint_comm]
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, subset_interior_iff]
#align mem_nhds_set_iff_exists mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists
theorem eventually_nhdsSet_iff_exists {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) ↔ ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ t → p x :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists
theorem eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall
theorem hasBasis_nhdsSet (s : Set X) : (𝓝ˢ s).HasBasis (fun U => IsOpen U ∧ s ⊆ U) fun U => U :=
⟨fun t => by simp [mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists, and_assoc]⟩
#align has_basis_nhds_set hasBasis_nhdsSet
@[simp]
lemma lift'_nhdsSet_interior (s : Set X) : (𝓝ˢ s).lift' interior = 𝓝ˢ s :=
(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).lift'_interior_eq_self fun _ ↦ And.left
lemma Filter.HasBasis.nhdsSet_interior {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {t : Set X}
(h : (𝓝ˢ t).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝ˢ t).HasBasis p (interior <| s ·) :=
lift'_nhdsSet_interior t ▸ h.lift'_interior
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet (hU : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, hU.interior_eq]
#align is_open.mem_nhds_set IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet_self (ho : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := ho.mem_nhdsSet.mpr Subset.rfl
theorem principal_le_nhdsSet : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓝ˢ s := fun _s hs =>
(subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.mpr hs).trans interior_subset
#align principal_le_nhds_set principal_le_nhdsSet
theorem subset_of_mem_nhdsSet (h : t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s) : s ⊆ t := principal_le_nhdsSet h
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsSet {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) : ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
principal_le_nhdsSet h
nonrec theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.self_of_nhdsSet {f g : X → Y} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) : EqOn f g s :=
h.self_of_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff : 𝓝ˢ s = 𝓟 s ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← principal_le_nhdsSet.le_iff_eq, le_principal_iff, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall,
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
#align nhds_set_eq_principal_iff nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.nhdsSet_eq⟩ := nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff
#align is_open.nhds_set_eq IsOpen.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_interior : 𝓝ˢ (interior s) = 𝓟 (interior s) :=
isOpen_interior.nhdsSet_eq
#align nhds_set_interior nhdsSet_interior
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_singleton : 𝓝ˢ {x} = 𝓝 x := by simp [nhdsSet]
#align nhds_set_singleton nhdsSet_singleton
theorem mem_nhdsSet_interior : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ (interior s) :=
subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.mp Subset.rfl
#align mem_nhds_set_interior mem_nhdsSet_interior
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_empty : 𝓝ˢ (∅ : Set X) = ⊥ := by rw [isOpen_empty.nhdsSet_eq, principal_empty]
#align nhds_set_empty nhdsSet_empty
| Mathlib/Topology/NhdsSet.lean | 135 | 135 | theorem mem_nhdsSet_empty : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ (∅ : Set X) := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ExtendToLocalization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationSubring
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.ValuedField
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.TypeTags
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.adic_valuation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical DiscreteValuation
open Multiplicative IsDedekindDomain
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDedekindDomain R] {K : Type*} [Field K]
[Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
namespace IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
def intValuationDef (r : R) : ℤₘ₀ :=
if r = 0 then 0
else
↑(Multiplicative.ofAdd
(-(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ))
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.intValuationDef
theorem intValuationDef_if_pos {r : R} (hr : r = 0) : v.intValuationDef r = 0 :=
if_pos hr
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_def_if_pos IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.intValuationDef_if_pos
theorem intValuationDef_if_neg {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
v.intValuationDef r =
Multiplicative.ofAdd
(-(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) :=
if_neg hr
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_def_if_neg IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.intValuationDef_if_neg
theorem int_valuation_ne_zero (x : R) (hx : x ≠ 0) : v.intValuationDef x ≠ 0 := by
rw [intValuationDef, if_neg hx]
exact WithZero.coe_ne_zero
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_ne_zero IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.int_valuation_ne_zero
theorem int_valuation_ne_zero' (x : nonZeroDivisors R) : v.intValuationDef x ≠ 0 :=
v.int_valuation_ne_zero x (nonZeroDivisors.coe_ne_zero x)
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_ne_zero' IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.int_valuation_ne_zero'
theorem int_valuation_zero_le (x : nonZeroDivisors R) : 0 < v.intValuationDef x := by
rw [v.intValuationDef_if_neg (nonZeroDivisors.coe_ne_zero x)]
exact WithZero.zero_lt_coe _
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_zero_le IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.int_valuation_zero_le
theorem int_valuation_le_one (x : R) : v.intValuationDef x ≤ 1 := by
rw [intValuationDef]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rw [if_pos hx]; exact WithZero.zero_le 1
· rw [if_neg hx, ← WithZero.coe_one, ← ofAdd_zero, WithZero.coe_le_coe, ofAdd_le,
Right.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact Int.natCast_nonneg _
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_le_one IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.int_valuation_le_one
theorem int_valuation_lt_one_iff_dvd (r : R) :
v.intValuationDef r < 1 ↔ v.asIdeal ∣ Ideal.span {r} := by
rw [intValuationDef]
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← WithZero.coe_one, ← ofAdd_zero, WithZero.coe_lt_coe, ofAdd_lt, neg_lt_zero, ←
Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_lt, zero_lt_iff]
have h : (Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
exact hr
apply Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd h (by apply v.irreducible)
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_lt_one_iff_dvd IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.int_valuation_lt_one_iff_dvd
theorem int_valuation_le_pow_iff_dvd (r : R) (n : ℕ) :
v.intValuationDef r ≤ Multiplicative.ofAdd (-(n : ℤ)) ↔ v.asIdeal ^ n ∣ Ideal.span {r} := by
rw [intValuationDef]
split_ifs with hr
· simp_rw [hr, Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, zero_le', Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [WithZero.coe_le_coe, ofAdd_le, neg_le_neg_iff, Int.ofNat_le, Ideal.dvd_span_singleton, ←
Associates.le_singleton_iff,
Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le (Associates.mk_ne_zero'.mpr hr)
(by apply v.associates_irreducible)]
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation_le_pow_iff_dvd IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.int_valuation_le_pow_iff_dvd
theorem IntValuation.map_zero' : v.intValuationDef 0 = 0 :=
v.intValuationDef_if_pos (Eq.refl 0)
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation.map_zero' IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.IntValuation.map_zero'
theorem IntValuation.map_one' : v.intValuationDef 1 = 1 := by
rw [v.intValuationDef_if_neg (zero_ne_one.symm : (1 : R) ≠ 0), Ideal.span_singleton_one, ←
Ideal.one_eq_top, Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one,
Associates.count_zero (by apply v.associates_irreducible), Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero, ofAdd_zero,
WithZero.coe_one]
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation.map_one' IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.IntValuation.map_one'
theorem IntValuation.map_mul' (x y : R) :
v.intValuationDef (x * y) = v.intValuationDef x * v.intValuationDef y := by
simp only [intValuationDef]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rw [hx, zero_mul, if_pos (Eq.refl _), zero_mul]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· rw [hy, mul_zero, if_pos (Eq.refl _), mul_zero]
· rw [if_neg hx, if_neg hy, if_neg (mul_ne_zero hx hy), ← WithZero.coe_mul, WithZero.coe_inj, ←
ofAdd_add, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Associates.mk_mul_mk, ← neg_add,
Associates.count_mul (by apply Associates.mk_ne_zero'.mpr hx)
(by apply Associates.mk_ne_zero'.mpr hy) (by apply v.associates_irreducible)]
rfl
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.int_valuation.map_mul' IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.IntValuation.map_mul'
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/AdicValuation.lean | 178 | 183 | theorem IntValuation.le_max_iff_min_le {a b c : ℕ} :
Multiplicative.ofAdd (-c : ℤ) ≤
max (Multiplicative.ofAdd (-a : ℤ)) (Multiplicative.ofAdd (-b : ℤ)) ↔
min a b ≤ c := by |
rw [le_max_iff, ofAdd_le, ofAdd_le, neg_le_neg_iff, neg_le_neg_iff, Int.ofNat_le, Int.ofNat_le,
← min_le_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Order.Units
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Ineq
#align_import group_theory.perm.sign from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
universe u v
open Equiv Function Fintype Finset
variable {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α] {β : Type v}
namespace Equiv.Perm
def modSwap (i j : α) : Setoid (Perm α) :=
⟨fun σ τ => σ = τ ∨ σ = swap i j * τ, fun σ => Or.inl (refl σ), fun {σ τ} h =>
Or.casesOn h (fun h => Or.inl h.symm) fun h => Or.inr (by rw [h, swap_mul_self_mul]),
fun {σ τ υ} hστ hτυ => by
cases' hστ with hστ hστ <;> cases' hτυ with hτυ hτυ <;> try rw [hστ, hτυ, swap_mul_self_mul] <;>
simp [hστ, hτυ] -- Porting note: should close goals, but doesn't
· simp [hστ, hτυ]
· simp [hστ, hτυ]
· simp [hστ, hτυ]⟩
#align equiv.perm.mod_swap Equiv.Perm.modSwap
noncomputable instance {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (i j : α) :
DecidableRel (modSwap i j).r :=
fun _ _ => Or.decidable
def swapFactorsAux :
∀ (l : List α) (f : Perm α),
(∀ {x}, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) → { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g }
| [] => fun f h =>
⟨[],
Equiv.ext fun x => by
rw [List.prod_nil]
exact (Classical.not_not.1 (mt h (List.not_mem_nil _))).symm,
by simp⟩
| x::l => fun f h =>
if hfx : x = f x then
swapFactorsAux l f fun {y} hy =>
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem (fun h : y = x => by simp [h, hfx.symm] at hy) (h hy)
else
let m :=
swapFactorsAux l (swap x (f x) * f) fun {y} hy =>
have : f y ≠ y ∧ y ≠ x := ne_and_ne_of_swap_mul_apply_ne_self hy
List.mem_of_ne_of_mem this.2 (h this.1)
⟨swap x (f x)::m.1, by
rw [List.prod_cons, m.2.1, ← mul_assoc, mul_def (swap x (f x)), swap_swap, ← one_def,
one_mul],
fun {g} hg => ((List.mem_cons).1 hg).elim (fun h => ⟨x, f x, hfx, h⟩) (m.2.2 _)⟩
#align equiv.perm.swap_factors_aux Equiv.Perm.swapFactorsAux
def swapFactors [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] (f : Perm α) :
{ l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
swapFactorsAux ((@univ α _).sort (· ≤ ·)) f fun {_ _} => (mem_sort _).2 (mem_univ _)
#align equiv.perm.swap_factors Equiv.Perm.swapFactors
def truncSwapFactors [Fintype α] (f : Perm α) :
Trunc { l : List (Perm α) // l.prod = f ∧ ∀ g ∈ l, IsSwap g } :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (@univ α _).1 (fun l h => Trunc.mk (swapFactorsAux l f (h _)))
(show ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ (@univ α _).1 from fun _ _ => mem_univ _)
#align equiv.perm.trunc_swap_factors Equiv.Perm.truncSwapFactors
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on [Finite α] {P : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (swap x y * f)) → P f := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
cases' (truncSwapFactors f).out with l hl
induction' l with g l ih generalizing f
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [hl.left.symm, List.prod_nil, forall_true_iff]
· intro h1 hmul_swap
rcases hl.2 g (by simp) with ⟨x, y, hxy⟩
rw [← hl.1, List.prod_cons, hxy.2]
exact
hmul_swap _ _ _ hxy.1
(ih _ ⟨rfl, fun v hv => hl.2 _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hv)⟩ h1 hmul_swap)
#align equiv.perm.swap_induction_on Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on
theorem closure_isSwap [Finite α] : Subgroup.closure { σ : Perm α | IsSwap σ } = ⊤ := by
cases nonempty_fintype α
refine eq_top_iff.mpr fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨h1, h2⟩ := Subtype.mem (truncSwapFactors x).out
rw [← h1]
exact Subgroup.list_prod_mem _ fun y hy => Subgroup.subset_closure (h2 y hy)
#align equiv.perm.closure_is_swap Equiv.Perm.closure_isSwap
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem swap_induction_on' [Finite α] {P : Perm α → Prop} (f : Perm α) :
P 1 → (∀ f x y, x ≠ y → P f → P (f * swap x y)) → P f := fun h1 IH =>
inv_inv f ▸ swap_induction_on f⁻¹ h1 fun f => IH f⁻¹
#align equiv.perm.swap_induction_on' Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on'
theorem isConj_swap {w x y z : α} (hwx : w ≠ x) (hyz : y ≠ z) : IsConj (swap w x) (swap y z) :=
isConj_iff.2
(have h :
∀ {y z : α},
y ≠ z → w ≠ z → swap w y * swap x z * swap w x * (swap w y * swap x z)⁻¹ = swap y z :=
fun {y z} hyz hwz => by
rw [mul_inv_rev, swap_inv, swap_inv, mul_assoc (swap w y), mul_assoc (swap w y), ←
mul_assoc _ (swap x z), swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwx hwz, ← mul_assoc,
swap_mul_swap_mul_swap hwz.symm hyz.symm]
if hwz : w = z then
have hwy : w ≠ y := by rw [hwz]; exact hyz.symm
⟨swap w z * swap x y, by rw [swap_comm y z, h hyz.symm hwy]⟩
else ⟨swap w y * swap x z, h hyz hwz⟩)
#align equiv.perm.is_conj_swap Equiv.Perm.isConj_swap
def finPairsLT (n : ℕ) : Finset (Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) :=
(univ : Finset (Fin n)).sigma fun a => (range a).attachFin fun _ hm => (mem_range.1 hm).trans a.2
#align equiv.perm.fin_pairs_lt Equiv.Perm.finPairsLT
theorem mem_finPairsLT {n : ℕ} {a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n} : a ∈ finPairsLT n ↔ a.2 < a.1 := by
simp only [finPairsLT, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, true_and_iff, mem_attachFin, mem_range, mem_univ,
mem_sigma]
#align equiv.perm.mem_fin_pairs_lt Equiv.Perm.mem_finPairsLT
def signAux {n : ℕ} (a : Perm (Fin n)) : ℤˣ :=
∏ x ∈ finPairsLT n, if a x.1 ≤ a x.2 then -1 else 1
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux Equiv.Perm.signAux
@[simp]
theorem signAux_one (n : ℕ) : signAux (1 : Perm (Fin n)) = 1 := by
unfold signAux
conv => rhs; rw [← @Finset.prod_const_one _ _ (finPairsLT n)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun a ha => if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).not_le
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_one Equiv.Perm.signAux_one
def signBijAux {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) (a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n) : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n :=
if _ : f a.2 < f a.1 then ⟨f a.1, f a.2⟩ else ⟨f a.2, f a.1⟩
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux Equiv.Perm.signBijAux
theorem signBijAux_injOn {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
(finPairsLT n : Set (Σ _, Fin n)).InjOn (signBijAux f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha ⟨b₁, b₂⟩ hb h
dsimp [signBijAux] at h
rw [Finset.mem_coe, mem_finPairsLT] at *
have : ¬b₁ < b₂ := hb.le.not_lt
split_ifs at h <;>
simp_all [(Equiv.injective f).eq_iff, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, heq_iff_eq]
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
· exact absurd this (not_le.mpr ha)
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_inj Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_injOn
theorem signBijAux_surj {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a ∈ finPairsLT n, ∃ b ∈ finPairsLT n, signBijAux f b = a :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha =>
if hxa : f⁻¹ a₂ < f⁻¹ a₁ then
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₁, f⁻¹ a₂⟩, mem_finPairsLT.2 hxa, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha)]⟩
else
⟨⟨f⁻¹ a₂, f⁻¹ a₁⟩,
mem_finPairsLT.2 <|
(le_of_not_gt hxa).lt_of_ne fun h => by
simp [mem_finPairsLT, f⁻¹.injective h, lt_irrefl] at ha, by
dsimp [signBijAux]
rw [apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self, if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).le.not_lt]⟩
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_surj Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_surj
theorem signBijAux_mem {n : ℕ} {f : Perm (Fin n)} :
∀ a : Σ_ : Fin n, Fin n, a ∈ finPairsLT n → signBijAux f a ∈ finPairsLT n :=
fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ha => by
unfold signBijAux
split_ifs with h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2 h
· exact mem_finPairsLT.2
((le_of_not_gt h).lt_of_ne fun h => (mem_finPairsLT.1 ha).ne (f.injective h.symm))
#align equiv.perm.sign_bij_aux_mem Equiv.Perm.signBijAux_mem
@[simp]
theorem signAux_inv {n : ℕ} (f : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux f⁻¹ = signAux f :=
prod_nbij (signBijAux f⁻¹) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj fun ⟨a, b⟩ hab ↦
if h : f⁻¹ b < f⁻¹ a then by
simp_all [signBijAux, dif_pos h, if_neg h.not_le, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_neg (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).not_le]
else by
simp_all [signBijAux, if_pos (le_of_not_gt h), dif_neg h, apply_inv_self, apply_inv_self,
if_pos (mem_finPairsLT.1 hab).le]
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_inv Equiv.Perm.signAux_inv
theorem signAux_mul {n : ℕ} (f g : Perm (Fin n)) : signAux (f * g) = signAux f * signAux g := by
rw [← signAux_inv g]
unfold signAux
rw [← prod_mul_distrib]
refine prod_nbij (signBijAux g) signBijAux_mem signBijAux_injOn signBijAux_surj ?_
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ hab
dsimp only [signBijAux]
rw [mul_apply, mul_apply]
rw [mem_finPairsLT] at hab
by_cases h : g b < g a
· rw [dif_pos h]
simp only [not_le_of_gt hab, mul_one, mul_ite, mul_neg, Perm.inv_apply_self, if_false]
· rw [dif_neg h, inv_apply_self, inv_apply_self, if_pos hab.le]
by_cases h₁ : f (g b) ≤ f (g a)
· have : f (g b) ≠ f (g a) := by
rw [Ne, f.injective.eq_iff, g.injective.eq_iff]
exact ne_of_lt hab
rw [if_pos h₁, if_neg (h₁.lt_of_ne this).not_le]
rfl
· rw [if_neg h₁, if_pos (lt_of_not_ge h₁).le]
rfl
#align equiv.perm.sign_aux_mul Equiv.Perm.signAux_mul
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one' (n : ℕ) : signAux (swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1) = -1 :=
show _ = ∏ x ∈ {(⟨1, 0⟩ : Σ a : Fin (n + 2), Fin (n + 2))},
if (Equiv.swap 0 1) x.1 ≤ swap 0 1 x.2 then (-1 : ℤˣ) else 1 by
refine Eq.symm (prod_subset (fun ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [mem_finPairsLT, Fin.one_pos]) fun a ha₁ ha₂ => ?_)
rcases a with ⟨a₁, a₂⟩
replace ha₁ : a₂ < a₁ := mem_finPairsLT.1 ha₁
dsimp only
rcases a₁.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H)
· exact absurd a₂.zero_le ha₁.not_le
rcases a₂.zero_le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | H')
· simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, mem_singleton, Sigma.mk.inj_iff] at ha₂
have : 1 < a₁ := lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.succ_le_of_lt ha₁)
(Ne.symm (by intro h; apply ha₂; simp [h]))
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 0 = 1 := by simp
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) ha₂, h01, if_neg this.not_le]
· have le : 1 ≤ a₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt H'
have lt : 1 < a₁ := le.trans_lt ha₁
have h01 : Equiv.swap (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 1 = 0 := by simp only [swap_apply_right]
rcases le.eq_or_lt with (rfl | lt')
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne H.ne' lt.ne', h01, if_neg H.not_le]
· rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H) (ne_of_gt lt),
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (ne_of_gt H') (ne_of_gt lt'), if_neg ha₁.not_le]
private theorem signAux_swap_zero_one {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
signAux (swap (⟨0, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩ : Fin n) ⟨1, lt_of_lt_of_le (by decide) hn⟩) =
-1 := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· norm_num at hn
· norm_num at hn
· exact signAux_swap_zero_one' n
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Sign.lean | 278 | 288 | theorem signAux_swap : ∀ {n : ℕ} {x y : Fin n} (_hxy : x ≠ y), signAux (swap x y) = -1
| 0, x, y => by intro; exact Fin.elim0 x
| 1, x, y => by
dsimp [signAux, swap, swapCore]
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, not_true, ite_true, le_refl, prod_const,
IsEmpty.forall_iff]
| n + 2, x, y => fun hxy => by
have h2n : 2 ≤ n + 2 := by | exact le_add_self
rw [← isConj_iff_eq, ← signAux_swap_zero_one h2n]
exact (MonoidHom.mk' signAux signAux_mul).map_isConj
(isConj_swap hxy (by exact of_decide_eq_true rfl))
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Extr
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ExtrClosure
#align_import analysis.complex.abs_max from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open TopologicalSpace Metric Set Filter Asymptotics Function MeasureTheory AffineMap Bornology
open scoped Topology Filter NNReal Real
universe u v w
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℂ F]
local postfix:100 "̂" => UniformSpace.Completion
namespace Complex
theorem norm_max_aux₁ [CompleteSpace F] {f : ℂ → F} {z w : ℂ}
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z (dist w z)))
(hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (closedBall z (dist w z)) z) : ‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ := by
-- Consider a circle of radius `r = dist w z`.
set r : ℝ := dist w z
have hw : w ∈ closedBall z r := mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl
-- Assume the converse. Since `‖f w‖ ≤ ‖f z‖`, we have `‖f w‖ < ‖f z‖`.
refine (isMaxOn_iff.1 hz _ hw).antisymm (not_lt.1 ?_)
rintro hw_lt : ‖f w‖ < ‖f z‖
have hr : 0 < r := dist_pos.2 (ne_of_apply_ne (norm ∘ f) hw_lt.ne)
-- Due to Cauchy integral formula, it suffices to prove the following inequality.
suffices ‖∮ ζ in C(z, r), (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ < 2 * π * ‖f z‖ by
refine this.ne ?_
have A : (∮ ζ in C(z, r), (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ) = (2 * π * I : ℂ) • f z :=
hd.circleIntegral_sub_inv_smul (mem_ball_self hr)
simp [A, norm_smul, Real.pi_pos.le]
suffices ‖∮ ζ in C(z, r), (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ < 2 * π * r * (‖f z‖ / r) by
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hr.ne'] at this
have hsub : sphere z r ⊆ closedBall z r := sphere_subset_closedBall
refine circleIntegral.norm_integral_lt_of_norm_le_const_of_lt hr ?_ ?_ ⟨w, rfl, ?_⟩
· show ContinuousOn (fun ζ : ℂ => (ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ) (sphere z r)
refine ((continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const).inv₀ ?_).smul (hd.continuousOn_ball.mono hsub)
exact fun ζ hζ => sub_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_mem_sphere hζ hr.ne')
· show ∀ ζ ∈ sphere z r, ‖(ζ - z)⁻¹ • f ζ‖ ≤ ‖f z‖ / r
rintro ζ (hζ : abs (ζ - z) = r)
rw [le_div_iff hr, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_eq_abs, hζ, mul_comm, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ hr.ne']
exact hz (hsub hζ)
show ‖(w - z)⁻¹ • f w‖ < ‖f z‖ / r
rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_eq_abs, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (div_lt_div_right hr).2 hw_lt
#align complex.norm_max_aux₁ Complex.norm_max_aux₁
theorem norm_max_aux₂ {f : ℂ → F} {z w : ℂ} (hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z (dist w z)))
(hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (closedBall z (dist w z)) z) : ‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ := by
set e : F →L[ℂ] F̂ := UniformSpace.Completion.toComplL
have he : ∀ x, ‖e x‖ = ‖x‖ := UniformSpace.Completion.norm_coe
replace hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ e ∘ f) (closedBall z (dist w z)) z := by
simpa only [IsMaxOn, (· ∘ ·), he] using hz
simpa only [he, (· ∘ ·)]
using norm_max_aux₁ (e.differentiable.comp_diffContOnCl hd) hz
#align complex.norm_max_aux₂ Complex.norm_max_aux₂
theorem norm_max_aux₃ {f : ℂ → F} {z w : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (hr : dist w z = r)
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z r)) (hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (ball z r) z) : ‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ := by
subst r
rcases eq_or_ne w z with (rfl | hne); · rfl
rw [← dist_ne_zero] at hne
exact norm_max_aux₂ hd (closure_ball z hne ▸ hz.closure hd.continuousOn.norm)
#align complex.norm_max_aux₃ Complex.norm_max_aux₃
theorem norm_eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn {f : E → F} {z : E} {r : ℝ}
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (ball z r)) (hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (ball z r) z) :
EqOn (norm ∘ f) (const E ‖f z‖) (closedBall z r) := by
intro w hw
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_comm] at hw
rcases eq_or_ne z w with (rfl | hne); · rfl
set e := (lineMap z w : ℂ → E)
have hde : Differentiable ℂ e := (differentiable_id.smul_const (w - z)).add_const z
suffices ‖(f ∘ e) (1 : ℂ)‖ = ‖(f ∘ e) (0 : ℂ)‖ by simpa [e]
have hr : dist (1 : ℂ) 0 = 1 := by simp
have hball : MapsTo e (ball 0 1) (ball z r) := by
refine ((lipschitzWith_lineMap z w).mapsTo_ball (mt nndist_eq_zero.1 hne) 0 1).mono
Subset.rfl ?_
simpa only [lineMap_apply_zero, mul_one, coe_nndist] using ball_subset_ball hw
exact norm_max_aux₃ hr (hd.comp hde.diffContOnCl hball)
(hz.comp_mapsTo hball (lineMap_apply_zero z w))
#align complex.norm_eq_on_closed_ball_of_is_max_on Complex.norm_eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn
theorem norm_eq_norm_of_isMaxOn_of_ball_subset {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {z w : E}
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f s) (hz : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) s z) (hsub : ball z (dist w z) ⊆ s) :
‖f w‖ = ‖f z‖ :=
norm_eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn (hd.mono hsub) (hz.on_subset hsub) (mem_closedBall.2 le_rfl)
#align complex.norm_eq_norm_of_is_max_on_of_ball_subset Complex.norm_eq_norm_of_isMaxOn_of_ball_subset
theorem norm_eventually_eq_of_isLocalMax {f : E → F} {c : E}
(hd : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝 c, DifferentiableAt ℂ f z) (hc : IsLocalMax (norm ∘ f) c) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 c, ‖f y‖ = ‖f c‖ := by
rcases nhds_basis_closedBall.eventually_iff.1 (hd.and hc) with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩
exact nhds_basis_closedBall.eventually_iff.2
⟨r, hr₀, norm_eqOn_closedBall_of_isMaxOn (DifferentiableOn.diffContOnCl fun x hx =>
(hr <| closure_ball_subset_closedBall hx).1.differentiableWithinAt) fun x hx =>
(hr <| ball_subset_closedBall hx).2⟩
#align complex.norm_eventually_eq_of_is_local_max Complex.norm_eventually_eq_of_isLocalMax
theorem isOpen_setOf_mem_nhds_and_isMaxOn_norm {f : E → F} {s : Set E}
(hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f s) : IsOpen {z | s ∈ 𝓝 z ∧ IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) s z} := by
refine isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun z hz => (eventually_eventually_nhds.2 hz.1).and ?_
replace hd : ∀ᶠ w in 𝓝 z, DifferentiableAt ℂ f w := hd.eventually_differentiableAt hz.1
exact (norm_eventually_eq_of_isLocalMax hd <| hz.2.isLocalMax hz.1).mono fun x hx y hy =>
le_trans (hz.2 hy).out hx.ge
#align complex.is_open_set_of_mem_nhds_and_is_max_on_norm Complex.isOpen_setOf_mem_nhds_and_isMaxOn_norm
theorem norm_eqOn_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn {f : E → F} {U : Set E} {c : E}
(hc : IsPreconnected U) (ho : IsOpen U) (hd : DifferentiableOn ℂ f U) (hcU : c ∈ U)
(hm : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) U c) : EqOn (norm ∘ f) (const E ‖f c‖) U := by
set V := U ∩ {z | IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) U z}
have hV : ∀ x ∈ V, ‖f x‖ = ‖f c‖ := fun x hx => le_antisymm (hm hx.1) (hx.2 hcU)
suffices U ⊆ V from fun x hx => hV x (this hx)
have hVo : IsOpen V := by
simpa only [ho.mem_nhds_iff, setOf_and, setOf_mem_eq]
using isOpen_setOf_mem_nhds_and_isMaxOn_norm hd
have hVne : (U ∩ V).Nonempty := ⟨c, hcU, hcU, hm⟩
set W := U ∩ {z | ‖f z‖ ≠ ‖f c‖}
have hWo : IsOpen W := hd.continuousOn.norm.isOpen_inter_preimage ho isOpen_ne
have hdVW : Disjoint V W := disjoint_left.mpr fun x hxV hxW => hxW.2 (hV x hxV)
have hUVW : U ⊆ V ∪ W := fun x hx =>
(eq_or_ne ‖f x‖ ‖f c‖).imp (fun h => ⟨hx, fun y hy => (hm hy).out.trans_eq h.symm⟩)
(And.intro hx)
exact hc.subset_left_of_subset_union hVo hWo hdVW hUVW hVne
#align complex.norm_eq_on_of_is_preconnected_of_is_max_on Complex.norm_eqOn_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn
theorem norm_eqOn_closure_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn {f : E → F} {U : Set E} {c : E}
(hc : IsPreconnected U) (ho : IsOpen U) (hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f U) (hcU : c ∈ U)
(hm : IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) U c) : EqOn (norm ∘ f) (const E ‖f c‖) (closure U) :=
(norm_eqOn_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn hc ho hd.differentiableOn hcU hm).of_subset_closure
hd.continuousOn.norm continuousOn_const subset_closure Subset.rfl
#align complex.norm_eq_on_closure_of_is_preconnected_of_is_max_on Complex.norm_eqOn_closure_of_isPreconnected_of_isMaxOn
variable [Nontrivial E]
theorem exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_norm [FiniteDimensional ℂ E] {f : E → F} {U : Set E}
(hb : IsBounded U) (hne : U.Nonempty) (hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f U) :
∃ z ∈ frontier U, IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (closure U) z := by
have hc : IsCompact (closure U) := hb.isCompact_closure
obtain ⟨w, hwU, hle⟩ : ∃ w ∈ closure U, IsMaxOn (norm ∘ f) (closure U) w :=
hc.exists_isMaxOn hne.closure hd.continuousOn.norm
rw [closure_eq_interior_union_frontier, mem_union] at hwU
cases' hwU with hwU hwU; rotate_left; · exact ⟨w, hwU, hle⟩
have : interior U ≠ univ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top hc.ne_univ interior_subset_closure
rcases exists_mem_frontier_infDist_compl_eq_dist hwU this with ⟨z, hzU, hzw⟩
refine ⟨z, frontier_interior_subset hzU, fun x hx => (hle hx).out.trans_eq ?_⟩
refine (norm_eq_norm_of_isMaxOn_of_ball_subset hd (hle.on_subset subset_closure) ?_).symm
rw [dist_comm, ← hzw]
exact ball_infDist_compl_subset.trans interior_subset
#align complex.exists_mem_frontier_is_max_on_norm Complex.exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_norm
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/AbsMax.lean | 387 | 406 | theorem norm_le_of_forall_mem_frontier_norm_le {f : E → F} {U : Set E} (hU : IsBounded U)
(hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f U) {C : ℝ} (hC : ∀ z ∈ frontier U, ‖f z‖ ≤ C) {z : E}
(hz : z ∈ closure U) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by |
rw [closure_eq_self_union_frontier, union_comm, mem_union] at hz
cases' hz with hz hz; · exact hC z hz
/- In case of a finite dimensional domain, one can just apply
`Complex.exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_norm`. To make it work in any Banach space, we restrict
the function to a line first. -/
rcases exists_ne z with ⟨w, hne⟩
set e := (lineMap z w : ℂ → E)
have hde : Differentiable ℂ e := (differentiable_id.smul_const (w - z)).add_const z
have hL : AntilipschitzWith (nndist z w)⁻¹ e := antilipschitzWith_lineMap hne.symm
replace hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' U) :=
hd.comp hde.diffContOnCl (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
have h₀ : (0 : ℂ) ∈ e ⁻¹' U := by simpa only [e, mem_preimage, lineMap_apply_zero]
rcases exists_mem_frontier_isMaxOn_norm (hL.isBounded_preimage hU) ⟨0, h₀⟩ hd with ⟨ζ, hζU, hζ⟩
calc
‖f z‖ = ‖f (e 0)‖ := by simp only [e, lineMap_apply_zero]
_ ≤ ‖f (e ζ)‖ := hζ (subset_closure h₀)
_ ≤ C := hC _ (hde.continuous.frontier_preimage_subset _ hζU)
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLatticeIntervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Monotone
#align_import topology.algebra.order.intermediate_value from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
open Filter OrderDual TopologicalSpace Function Set
open Topology Filter
universe u v w
section
variable {X : Type u} {α : Type v} [TopologicalSpace X] [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OrderClosedTopology α]
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂ [PreconnectedSpace X] {a b : X} {f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (hb : g b ≤ f b) : ∃ x, f x = g x := by
obtain ⟨x, _, hfg, hgf⟩ : (univ ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x ∧ g x ≤ f x }).Nonempty :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 PreconnectedSpace.isPreconnected_univ _ _ (isClosed_le hf hg)
(isClosed_le hg hf) (fun _ _ => le_total _ _) ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩ ⟨b, trivial, hb⟩
exact ⟨x, le_antisymm hfg hgf⟩
#align intermediate_value_univ₂ intermediate_value_univ₂
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ [PreconnectedSpace X] {a : X} {l : Filter X} [NeBot l]
{f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (he : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) :
∃ x, f x = g x :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := he.exists; intermediate_value_univ₂ hf hg ha h
#align intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ [PreconnectedSpace X] {l₁ l₂ : Filter X} [NeBot l₁]
[NeBot l₂] {f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (he₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l₁] g)
(he₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l₂] f) : ∃ x, f x = g x :=
let ⟨_, h₁⟩ := he₁.exists
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := he₂.exists
intermediate_value_univ₂ hf hg h₁ h₂
#align intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : X}
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f g : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(ha' : f a ≤ g a) (hb' : g b ≤ f b) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂ s α _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ _ _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf) (continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hg) ha'
hb'
⟨x, x.2, hx⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f g : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (ha' : f a ≤ g a) (he : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x := by
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf hg
obtain ⟨b, h⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ _
(comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl) _ _ hf hg ha' (he.comap _)
exact ⟨b, b.prop, h⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
{l₁ l₂ : Filter X} [NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f g : X → α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (he₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l₁] g) (he₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l₂] f) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x := by
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf hg
obtain ⟨b, h⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) _ _
(comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl₁) (comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl₂) _ _ hf hg
(he₁.comap _) (he₂.comap _)
exact ⟨b, b.prop, h⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : X} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' s := fun _x hx =>
hs.intermediate_value₂ ha hb hf continuousOn_const hx.1 hx.2
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value IsPreconnected.intermediate_value
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) {v : α}
(ht : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : Ico (f a) v ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl hf continuousOn_const h.1
(eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h.2 ht)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ico IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) {v : α}
(ht : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : Ioc v (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
(hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl continuousOn_const hf h.2
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h.1 ht)).imp fun _ h => h.imp_right Eq.symm
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v₁ v₂ : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ (𝓝 v₁)) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ (𝓝 v₂)) :
Ioo v₁ v₂ ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h.1 ht₁) (eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h.2 ht₂)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : Tendsto f l atTop) : Ici (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl hf continuousOn_const h (tendsto_atTop.1 ht y)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ici IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iic {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : Tendsto f l atBot) : Iic (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
(hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl continuousOn_const hf h (tendsto_atBot.1 ht y)).imp
fun _ h => h.imp_right Eq.symm
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iic IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iic
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ (𝓝 v)) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ atTop) : Ioi v ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h ht₁) (tendsto_atTop.1 ht₂ y)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iio {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ atBot) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ (𝓝 v)) : Iio v ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const (tendsto_atBot.1 ht₁ y)
(eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h ht₂)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iio IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iio
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iii {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ atBot) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ atTop) : univ ⊆ f '' s := fun y _ =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const (tendsto_atBot.1 ht₁ y)
(tendsto_atTop.1 ht₂ y)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iii IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iii
theorem intermediate_value_univ [PreconnectedSpace X] (a b : X) {f : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ range f := fun _ hx => intermediate_value_univ₂ hf continuous_const hx.1 hx.2
#align intermediate_value_univ intermediate_value_univ
theorem mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge [PreconnectedSpace X] {c : α} {f : X → α}
(hf : Continuous f) (h₁ : ∃ a, f a ≤ c) (h₂ : ∃ b, c ≤ f b) : c ∈ range f :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁; let ⟨b, hb⟩ := h₂; intermediate_value_univ a b hf ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge
theorem IsPreconnected.Icc_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) : Icc a b ⊆ s := by
simpa only [image_id] using hs.intermediate_value ha hb continuousOn_id
#align is_preconnected.Icc_subset IsPreconnected.Icc_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.ordConnected {s : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected s) : OrdConnected s :=
⟨fun _ hx _ hy => h.Icc_subset hx hy⟩
#align is_preconnected.ord_connected IsPreconnected.ordConnected
theorem IsConnected.Icc_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsConnected s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) : Icc a b ⊆ s :=
hs.2.Icc_subset ha hb
#align is_connected.Icc_subset IsConnected.Icc_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : ¬BddBelow s)
(ha : ¬BddAbove s) : s = univ := by
refine eq_univ_of_forall fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := not_bddBelow_iff.1 hb x
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bddAbove_iff.1 ha x
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
#align is_preconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded IsPreconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded
end
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] [Nonempty γ]
theorem IsConnected.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsConnected s) (hb : BddBelow s)
(ha : BddAbove s) : Ioo (sInf s) (sSup s) ⊆ s := fun _x hx =>
let ⟨_y, ys, hy⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_csInf hs.nonempty hb)).1 hx.1
let ⟨_z, zs, hz⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff (isLUB_csSup hs.nonempty ha)).1 hx.2
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨hy.le, hz.le⟩
#align is_connected.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset IsConnected.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset
theorem eq_Icc_csInf_csSup_of_connected_bdd_closed {s : Set α} (hc : IsConnected s)
(hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (hcl : IsClosed s) : s = Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
(subset_Icc_csInf_csSup hb ha).antisymm <|
hc.Icc_subset (hcl.csInf_mem hc.nonempty hb) (hcl.csSup_mem hc.nonempty ha)
#align eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed eq_Icc_csInf_csSup_of_connected_bdd_closed
theorem IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : BddBelow s)
(ha : ¬BddAbove s) : Ioi (sInf s) ⊆ s := fun x hx =>
have sne : s.Nonempty := nonempty_of_not_bddAbove ha
let ⟨_y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := (isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_csInf sne hb)).1 hx
let ⟨_z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bddAbove_iff.1 ha x
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨hy.le, hz.le⟩
#align is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.Iio_csSup_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : ¬BddBelow s)
(ha : BddAbove s) : Iio (sSup s) ⊆ s :=
IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ha hb
#align is_preconnected.Iio_cSup_subset IsPreconnected.Iio_csSup_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.mem_intervals {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ∈
({Icc (sInf s) (sSup s), Ico (sInf s) (sSup s), Ioc (sInf s) (sSup s), Ioo (sInf s) (sSup s),
Ici (sInf s), Ioi (sInf s), Iic (sSup s), Iio (sSup s), univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· apply_rules [Or.inr, mem_singleton]
have hs' : IsConnected s := ⟨hne, hs⟩
by_cases hb : BddBelow s <;> by_cases ha : BddAbove s
· refine mem_of_subset_of_mem ?_ <| mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset
(hs'.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset hb ha) (subset_Icc_csInf_csSup hb ha)
simp only [insert_subset_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, true_or, or_true,
singleton_subset_iff, and_self]
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr ?_
cases'
mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Ioi_csInf_subset hb ha) fun x hx => csInf_le hb hx with
hs hs
· exact Or.inl hs
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hs)
· iterate 6 apply Or.inr
cases' mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Iio_csSup_subset hb ha) fun x hx => le_csSup ha hx
with hs hs
· exact Or.inl hs
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hs)
· iterate 8 apply Or.inr
exact Or.inl (hs.eq_univ_of_unbounded hb ha)
#align is_preconnected.mem_intervals IsPreconnected.mem_intervals
theorem setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered :
{ s : Set α | IsPreconnected s } ⊆
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) := by
intro s hs
rcases hs.mem_intervals with (hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs) <;> rw [hs] <;>
simp only [union_insert, union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_union, mem_range, Prod.exists,
uncurry_apply_pair, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or, or_true, exists_apply_eq_apply2]
#align set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hab : a ≤ b) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, (s ∩ Ioc x b).Nonempty) : b ∈ s := by
let S := s ∩ Icc a b
replace ha : a ∈ S := ⟨ha, left_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
have Sbd : BddAbove S := ⟨b, fun z hz => hz.2.2⟩
let c := sSup (s ∩ Icc a b)
have c_mem : c ∈ S := hs.csSup_mem ⟨_, ha⟩ Sbd
have c_le : c ≤ b := csSup_le ⟨_, ha⟩ fun x hx => hx.2.2
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le c_le with hc hc
· exact hc ▸ c_mem.1
exfalso
rcases hgt c ⟨c_mem.1, c_mem.2.1, hc⟩ with ⟨x, xs, cx, xb⟩
exact not_lt_of_le (le_csSup Sbd ⟨xs, le_trans (le_csSup Sbd ha) (le_of_lt cx), xb⟩) cx
#align is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt
theorem IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, ∀ y ∈ Ioi x, (s ∩ Ioc x y).Nonempty) : Icc a b ⊆ s := by
intro y hy
have : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a y) := by
suffices s ∩ Icc a y = s ∩ Icc a b ∩ Icc a y by
rw [this]
exact IsClosed.inter hs isClosed_Icc
rw [inter_assoc]
congr
exact (inter_eq_self_of_subset_right <| Icc_subset_Icc_right hy.2).symm
exact
IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt this ha hy.1 fun x hx =>
hgt x ⟨hx.1, Ico_subset_Ico_right hy.2 hx.2⟩ y hx.2.2
#align is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt
variable [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
theorem IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin {a b : α} {s : Set α}
(hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b)) (ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, s ∈ 𝓝[>] x) :
Icc a b ⊆ s := by
apply hs.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩ y hyxb
have : s ∩ Ioc x y ∈ 𝓝[>] x :=
inter_mem (hgt x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩) (Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hyxb⟩)
exact (nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨b, hxab.2⟩).nonempty_of_mem this
#align is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem isPreconnected_Icc_aux (x y : α) (s t : Set α) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hs : IsClosed s)
(ht : IsClosed t) (hab : Icc a b ⊆ s ∪ t) (hx : x ∈ Icc a b ∩ s) (hy : y ∈ Icc a b ∩ t) :
(Icc a b ∩ (s ∩ t)).Nonempty := by
have xyab : Icc x y ⊆ Icc a b := Icc_subset_Icc hx.1.1 hy.1.2
by_contra hst
suffices Icc x y ⊆ s from
hst ⟨y, xyab <| right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, this <| right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, hy.2⟩
apply (IsClosed.inter hs isClosed_Icc).Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin hx.2
rintro z ⟨zs, hz⟩
have zt : z ∈ tᶜ := fun zt => hst ⟨z, xyab <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hz, zs, zt⟩
have : tᶜ ∩ Ioc z y ∈ 𝓝[>] z := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi hz.2]
exact mem_nhdsWithin.2 ⟨tᶜ, ht.isOpen_compl, zt, Subset.rfl⟩
apply mem_of_superset this
have : Ioc z y ⊆ s ∪ t := fun w hw => hab (xyab ⟨le_trans hz.1 (le_of_lt hw.1), hw.2⟩)
exact fun w ⟨wt, wzy⟩ => (this wzy).elim id fun h => (wt h).elim
#align is_preconnected_Icc_aux isPreconnected_Icc_aux
theorem isPreconnected_Icc : IsPreconnected (Icc a b) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2
(by
rintro s t hs ht hab ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
-- This used to use `wlog`, but it was causing timeouts.
rcases le_total x y with h | h
· exact isPreconnected_Icc_aux x y s t h hs ht hab hx hy
· rw [inter_comm s t]
rw [union_comm s t] at hab
exact isPreconnected_Icc_aux y x t s h ht hs hab hy hx)
#align is_preconnected_Icc isPreconnected_Icc
theorem isPreconnected_uIcc : IsPreconnected (uIcc a b) :=
isPreconnected_Icc
#align is_preconnected_uIcc isPreconnected_uIcc
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : s.OrdConnected) : IsPreconnected s :=
isPreconnected_of_forall_pair fun x hx y hy =>
⟨uIcc x y, h.uIcc_subset hx hy, left_mem_uIcc, right_mem_uIcc, isPreconnected_uIcc⟩
#align set.ord_connected.is_preconnected Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected
theorem isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected {s : Set α} : IsPreconnected s ↔ OrdConnected s :=
⟨IsPreconnected.ordConnected, Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected⟩
#align is_preconnected_iff_ord_connected isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected
theorem isPreconnected_Ici : IsPreconnected (Ici a) :=
ordConnected_Ici.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ici isPreconnected_Ici
theorem isPreconnected_Iic : IsPreconnected (Iic a) :=
ordConnected_Iic.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Iic isPreconnected_Iic
theorem isPreconnected_Iio : IsPreconnected (Iio a) :=
ordConnected_Iio.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Iio isPreconnected_Iio
theorem isPreconnected_Ioi : IsPreconnected (Ioi a) :=
ordConnected_Ioi.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioi isPreconnected_Ioi
theorem isPreconnected_Ioo : IsPreconnected (Ioo a b) :=
ordConnected_Ioo.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioo isPreconnected_Ioo
theorem isPreconnected_Ioc : IsPreconnected (Ioc a b) :=
ordConnected_Ioc.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioc isPreconnected_Ioc
theorem isPreconnected_Ico : IsPreconnected (Ico a b) :=
ordConnected_Ico.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ico isPreconnected_Ico
theorem isConnected_Ici : IsConnected (Ici a) :=
⟨nonempty_Ici, isPreconnected_Ici⟩
#align is_connected_Ici isConnected_Ici
theorem isConnected_Iic : IsConnected (Iic a) :=
⟨nonempty_Iic, isPreconnected_Iic⟩
#align is_connected_Iic isConnected_Iic
theorem isConnected_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : IsConnected (Ioi a) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioi, isPreconnected_Ioi⟩
#align is_connected_Ioi isConnected_Ioi
theorem isConnected_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : IsConnected (Iio a) :=
⟨nonempty_Iio, isPreconnected_Iio⟩
#align is_connected_Iio isConnected_Iio
theorem isConnected_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsConnected (Icc a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Icc.2 h, isPreconnected_Icc⟩
#align is_connected_Icc isConnected_Icc
theorem isConnected_Ioo (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ioo a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioo.2 h, isPreconnected_Ioo⟩
#align is_connected_Ioo isConnected_Ioo
theorem isConnected_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ioc a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioc.2 h, isPreconnected_Ioc⟩
#align is_connected_Ioc isConnected_Ioc
theorem isConnected_Ico (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ico a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ico.2 h, isPreconnected_Ico⟩
#align is_connected_Ico isConnected_Ico
instance (priority := 100) ordered_connected_space : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨ordConnected_univ.isPreconnected⟩
#align ordered_connected_space ordered_connected_space
theorem setOf_isPreconnected_eq_of_ordered :
{ s : Set α | IsPreconnected s } =
-- bounded intervals
range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) := by
refine Subset.antisymm setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered ?_
simp only [subset_def, forall_mem_range, uncurry, or_imp, forall_and, mem_union,
mem_setOf_eq, insert_eq, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq, forall_true_iff, and_true_iff,
isPreconnected_Icc, isPreconnected_Ico, isPreconnected_Ioc, isPreconnected_Ioo,
isPreconnected_Ioi, isPreconnected_Iio, isPreconnected_Ici, isPreconnected_Iic,
isPreconnected_univ, isPreconnected_empty]
#align set_of_is_preconnected_eq_of_ordered setOf_isPreconnected_eq_of_ordered
lemma isTotallyDisconnected_iff_lt {s : Set α} :
IsTotallyDisconnected s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x < y → ∃ z ∉ s, z ∈ Ioo x y := by
simp only [IsTotallyDisconnected, isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected, ← not_nontrivial_iff,
nontrivial_iff_exists_lt, not_exists, not_and]
refine ⟨fun h x hx y hy hxy ↦ ?_, fun h t hts ht x hx y hy hxy ↦ ?_⟩
· simp_rw [← not_ordConnected_inter_Icc_iff hx hy]
exact fun hs ↦ h _ inter_subset_left hs _ ⟨hx, le_rfl, hxy.le⟩ _ ⟨hy, hxy.le, le_rfl⟩ hxy
· obtain ⟨z, h1z, h2z⟩ := h x (hts hx) y (hts hy) hxy
exact h1z <| hts <| ht.1 hx hy ⟨h2z.1.le, h2z.2.le⟩
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderClosedTopology δ]
theorem intermediate_value_Icc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Icc a b :=
isPreconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
#align intermediate_value_Icc intermediate_value_Icc
theorem intermediate_value_Icc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Icc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Icc a b :=
isPreconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
#align intermediate_value_Icc' intermediate_value_Icc'
theorem intermediate_value_uIcc {a b : α} {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (uIcc a b)) :
uIcc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' uIcc a b := by
cases le_total (f a) (f b) <;> simp [*, isPreconnected_uIcc.intermediate_value]
#align intermediate_value_uIcc intermediate_value_uIcc
theorem intermediate_value_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ico (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ico a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_lt_of_le (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ico _ _ ⟨refl a, hlt⟩
(right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ico intermediate_value_Ico
theorem intermediate_value_Ico' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ioc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ico a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_lt_of_le (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ico _ _ ⟨refl a, hlt⟩
(right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ico' intermediate_value_Ico'
theorem intermediate_value_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ioc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ioc a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_le_of_lt (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioc _ _ ⟨hlt, refl b⟩
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioc intermediate_value_Ioc
theorem intermediate_value_Ioc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ico (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ioc a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_le_of_lt (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioc _ _ ⟨hlt, refl b⟩
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioc' intermediate_value_Ioc'
theorem intermediate_value_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ioo (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ioo a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_lt_of_lt (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioo _ _
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) (right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) inf_le_right inf_le_right _
(hf.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) _ _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioo intermediate_value_Ioo
theorem intermediate_value_Ioo' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ioo (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ioo a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_lt_of_lt (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioo _ _
(right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) (left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) inf_le_right inf_le_right _
(hf.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) _ _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioo' intermediate_value_Ioo'
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_Icc {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : SurjOn f s (Icc (f a) (f b)) :=
hs.isPreconnected.intermediate_value ha hb hf
#align continuous_on.surj_on_Icc ContinuousOn.surjOn_Icc
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_uIcc {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
SurjOn f s (uIcc (f a) (f b)) := by
rcases le_total (f a) (f b) with hab | hab <;> simp [hf.surjOn_Icc, *]
#align continuous_on.surj_on_uIcc ContinuousOn.surjOn_uIcc
theorem Continuous.surjective {f : α → δ} (hf : Continuous f) (h_top : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(h_bot : Tendsto f atBot atBot) : Function.Surjective f := fun p =>
mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge hf (h_bot.eventually (eventually_le_atBot p)).exists
(h_top.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop p)).exists
#align continuous.surjective Continuous.surjective
theorem Continuous.surjective' {f : α → δ} (hf : Continuous f) (h_top : Tendsto f atBot atTop)
(h_bot : Tendsto f atTop atBot) : Function.Surjective f :=
Continuous.surjective (α := αᵒᵈ) hf h_top h_bot
#align continuous.surjective' Continuous.surjective'
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto {f : α → δ} {s : Set α} [OrdConnected s] (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hbot : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atBot atBot)
(htop : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atTop atTop) : SurjOn f s univ :=
haveI := Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty hs.to_subtype
surjOn_iff_surjective.2 <| hf.restrict.surjective htop hbot
#align continuous_on.surj_on_of_tendsto ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto' {f : α → δ} {s : Set α} [OrdConnected s] (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hbot : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atBot atTop)
(htop : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atTop atBot) : SurjOn f s univ :=
ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto (δ := δᵒᵈ) hs hf hbot htop
#align continuous_on.surj_on_of_tendsto' ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto'
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/IntermediateValue.lean | 654 | 671 | theorem Continuous.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder [BoundedOrder α] {f : α → δ}
(hf_c : Continuous f) (hf : f ⊥ ≤ f ⊤) (hf_i : Injective f) : StrictMono f := by |
intro a b hab
by_contra! h
have H : f b < f a := lt_of_le_of_ne h <| hf_i.ne hab.ne'
by_cases ha : f a ≤ f ⊥
· obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioc le_top hf_c.continuousOn ⟨H.trans_le ha, hf⟩
have : u = ⊥ := hf_i hu.2
aesop
· by_cases hb : f ⊥ < f b
· obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioo bot_le hf_c.continuousOn ⟨hb, H⟩
rw [hf_i hu.2] at hu
exact (hab.trans hu.1.2).false
· push_neg at ha hb
replace hb : f b < f ⊥ := lt_of_le_of_ne hb <| hf_i.ne (lt_of_lt_of_le' hab bot_le).ne'
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioo' hab.le hf_c.continuousOn ⟨hb, ha⟩
have : u = ⊥ := hf_i hu.2
aesop
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b7c740e25651db0ba63648fbae9f9d6f941e31b"
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [_root_.abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by continuity) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
exact this
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 275 | 280 | theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by |
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import data.finsupp.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"842328d9df7e96fd90fc424e115679c15fb23a71"
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
support : Finset α
toFun : α → M
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
#align finsupp Finsupp
#align finsupp.support Finsupp.support
#align finsupp.to_fun Finsupp.toFun
#align finsupp.mem_support_to_fun Finsupp.mem_support_toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
#align finsupp.fun_like Finsupp.instFunLike
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →₀ M) fun _ => α → M :=
inferInstance
#align finsupp.has_coe_to_fun Finsupp.instCoeFun
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align finsupp.ext Finsupp.ext
#align finsupp.ext_iff DFunLike.ext_iff
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
#align finsupp.coe_fn_inj DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align finsupp.coe_fn_injective DFunLike.coe_injective
#align finsupp.congr_fun DFunLike.congr_fun
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.coe_mk Finsupp.coe_mk
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
#align finsupp.has_zero Finsupp.instZero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
#align finsupp.coe_zero Finsupp.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.zero_apply Finsupp.zero_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finsupp.support_zero Finsupp.support_zero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
#align finsupp.inhabited Finsupp.instInhabited
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
#align finsupp.mem_support_iff Finsupp.mem_support_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
#align finsupp.fun_support_eq Finsupp.fun_support_eq
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
#align finsupp.not_mem_support_iff Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
#align finsupp.coe_eq_zero Finsupp.coe_eq_zero
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
#align finsupp.ext_iff' Finsupp.ext_iff'
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
#align finsupp.support_eq_empty Finsupp.support_eq_empty
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 203 | 204 | theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by |
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Inv
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
section Real
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
theorem toReal_add (ha : a ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : (a + b).toReal = a.toReal + b.toReal := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
rfl
#align ennreal.to_real_add ENNReal.toReal_add
theorem toReal_sub_of_le {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : b ≤ a) (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
(a - b).toReal = a.toReal - b.toReal := by
lift b to ℝ≥0 using ne_top_of_le_ne_top ha h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_sub, ENNReal.coe_toReal, NNReal.coe_sub (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mp h)]
#align ennreal.to_real_sub_of_le ENNReal.toReal_sub_of_le
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Real.lean | 50 | 55 | theorem le_toReal_sub {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (hb : b ≠ ∞) : a.toReal - b.toReal ≤ (a - b).toReal := by |
lift b to ℝ≥0 using hb
induction a
· simp
· simp only [← coe_sub, NNReal.sub_def, Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_toReal]
exact le_max_left _ _
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.concrete from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α}
theorem formPerm_disjoint_iff (hl : Nodup l) (hl' : Nodup l') (hn : 2 ≤ l.length)
(hn' : 2 ≤ l'.length) : Perm.Disjoint (formPerm l) (formPerm l') ↔ l.Disjoint l' := by
rw [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, List.Disjoint]
constructor
· rintro h x hx hx'
specialize h x
rw [formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl _ hx, formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl' _ hx'] at h
omega
· intro h x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l
on_goal 1 => by_cases hx' : x ∈ l'
· exact (h hx hx').elim
all_goals have := formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ ‹_›; tauto
#align list.form_perm_disjoint_iff List.formPerm_disjoint_iff
theorem isCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) : IsCycle (formPerm l) := by
cases' l with x l
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num at hn
induction' l with y l generalizing x
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num at hn
· use x
constructor
· rwa [formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_cons_self _ _)]
· intro w hw
have : w ∈ x::y::l := mem_of_formPerm_ne_self _ _ hw
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := get_of_mem this
use k
rw [← hk]
simp only [zpow_natCast, formPerm_pow_apply_head _ _ hl k, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt k.isLt]
#align list.is_cycle_form_perm List.isCycle_formPerm
theorem pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
Pairwise l.formPerm.SameCycle l :=
Pairwise.imp_mem.mpr
(pairwise_of_forall fun _ _ hx hy =>
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).sameCycle ((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hx).mpr hn)
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hy).mpr hn))
#align list.pairwise_same_cycle_form_perm List.pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 97 | 102 | theorem cycleOf_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) (x) :
cycleOf l.attach.formPerm x = l.attach.formPerm :=
have hn : 2 ≤ l.attach.length := by | rwa [← length_attach] at hn
have hl : l.attach.Nodup := by rwa [← nodup_attach] at hl
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).cycleOf_eq
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_attach _ _)).mpr hn)
|
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
#align_import topology.uniform_space.equicontinuity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y Z α α' β β' γ 𝓕 : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[tZ : TopologicalSpace Z] [uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
#align equicontinuous_at EquicontinuousAt
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
#align set.equicontinuous_at Set.EquicontinuousAt
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
#align equicontinuous Equicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
#align set.equicontinuous Set.Equicontinuous
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
#align uniform_equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous Set.UniformEquicontinuous
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prod_map, ← map_comap]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prod_mk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_pair equicontinuousAt_iff_pair
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
#align uniform_equicontinuous.equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
#align equicontinuous_at.continuous_at EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous_at.continuous_at_of_mem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
#align equicontinuous.continuous Equicontinuous.continuous
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous_of_mem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align equicontinuous_at.comp EquicontinuousAt.comp
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous_at.mono Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
#align equicontinuous.comp Equicontinuous.comp
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous.mono Set.Equicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.comp UniformEquicontinuous.comp
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.mono Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_range equicontinuousAt_iff_range
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
#align equicontinuous_iff_range equicontinuous_iff_range
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
#align uniform_equicontinuous_at_iff_range uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_continuous_at equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
#align equicontinuous_iff_continuous equicontinuous_iff_continuous
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align uniform_equicontinuous_iff_uniform_continuous uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'}
{S : Set β} : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔
∀ k, UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uα := _)]
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := t k) F S x₀) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S x₀ := by
simp [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold ContinuousWithinAt nhdsWithin at hk ⊢
rw [nhds_iInf]
exact hk.mono_left <| inf_le_inf_right _ <| iInf_le _ k
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousAt (tX := t k) F x₀) :
EquicontinuousAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F x₀ := by
rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
exact equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom hk
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{k : κ} (hk : Equicontinuous (tX := t k) F) :
Equicontinuous (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F :=
fun x ↦ equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom (hk x)
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousOn (tX := t k) F S) :
EquicontinuousOn (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S :=
fun x hx ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom (hk x hx)
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 619 | 623 | theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_dom {u : κ → UniformSpace β'} {F : ι → β' → α}
{k : κ} (hk : UniformEquicontinuous (uβ := u k) F) :
UniformEquicontinuous (uβ := ⨅ k, u k) F := by |
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uβ := _)] at hk ⊢
exact uniformContinuous_iInf_dom hk
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
#align_import linear_algebra.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6d584f1709bedbed9175bd9350df46599bdd7213"
noncomputable section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
variable (p q : Submodule R E)
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module S M] (m : Submodule S M)
namespace LinearMap
variable {p}
open Submodule
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
ker (id - p.subtype.comp f) = p := by
ext x
simp only [comp_apply, mem_ker, subtype_apply, sub_apply, id_apply, sub_eq_zero]
exact ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ Submodule.coe_mem _, fun hx => by erw [hf ⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩
#align linear_map.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj LinearMap.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj
theorem range_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 fun x => ⟨x, hf x⟩
#align linear_map.range_eq_of_proj LinearMap.range_eq_of_proj
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projection.lean | 52 | 62 | theorem isCompl_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : IsCompl p (ker f) := by |
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hpx, hfx⟩
erw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, hf ⟨x, hpx⟩, mk_eq_zero] at hfx
simp only [hfx, SetLike.mem_coe, zero_mem]
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
intro x _
rw [mem_sup']
refine ⟨f x, ⟨x - f x, ?_⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
rw [mem_ker, LinearMap.map_sub, hf, sub_self]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Braided.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Monoidal.Basic
#align_import algebra.category.Module.monoidal.symmetric from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74403a3b2551b0970855e14ef5e8fd0d6af1bfc2"
suppress_compilation
universe v w x u
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
namespace ModuleCat
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
def braiding (M N : ModuleCat.{u} R) : M ⊗ N ≅ N ⊗ M :=
LinearEquiv.toModuleIso (TensorProduct.comm R M N)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Module.braiding ModuleCat.braiding
namespace MonoidalCategory
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/ModuleCat/Monoidal/Symmetric.lean | 34 | 38 | theorem braiding_naturality {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ : ModuleCat.{u} R} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (Y₁.braiding Y₂).hom = (X₁.braiding X₂).hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) := by |
apply TensorProduct.ext'
intro x y
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.factorization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
-- Workaround for lean4#2038
attribute [-instance] instBEqNat
open Nat Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
def factorization (n : ℕ) : ℕ →₀ ℕ where
support := n.primeFactors
toFun p := if p.Prime then padicValNat p n else 0
mem_support_toFun := by simp [not_or]; aesop
#align nat.factorization Nat.factorization
@[simp] lemma support_factorization (n : ℕ) : (factorization n).support = n.primeFactors := rfl
theorem factorization_def (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : n.factorization p = padicValNat p n := by
simpa [factorization] using absurd pp
#align nat.factorization_def Nat.factorization_def
@[simp]
theorem factors_count_eq {n p : ℕ} : n.factors.count p = n.factorization p := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn0)
· simp [factorization, count]
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt prime_of_mem_factors pp)]
simp [factorization, pp]
simp only [factorization_def _ pp]
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
exact List.le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.mp le_rfl |>.subperm
· rw [← lt_add_one_iff, lt_iff_not_ge, ge_iff_le,
le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
intro h
have := h.count_le p
simp at this
#align nat.factors_count_eq Nat.factors_count_eq
theorem factorization_eq_factors_multiset (n : ℕ) :
n.factorization = Multiset.toFinsupp (n.factors : Multiset ℕ) := by
ext p
simp
#align nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset Nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset
theorem multiplicity_eq_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
multiplicity p n = n.factorization p := by
simp [factorization, pp, padicValNat_def' pp.ne_one hn.bot_lt]
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization Nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization
@[simp]
theorem factorization_prod_pow_eq_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization.prod (· ^ ·) = n := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp only [← prod_toMultiset, factorization, Multiset.prod_coe, Multiset.toFinsupp_toMultiset]
exact prod_factors hn
#align nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self
theorem eq_of_factorization_eq {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ p : ℕ, a.factorization p = b.factorization p) : a = b :=
eq_of_perm_factors ha hb (by simpa only [List.perm_iff_count, factors_count_eq] using h)
#align nat.eq_of_factorization_eq Nat.eq_of_factorization_eq
theorem factorization_inj : Set.InjOn factorization { x : ℕ | x ≠ 0 } := fun a ha b hb h =>
eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => by simp [h]
#align nat.factorization_inj Nat.factorization_inj
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero : factorization 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_zero Nat.factorization_zero
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one : factorization 1 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_one Nat.factorization_one
#noalign nat.support_factorization
#align nat.factor_iff_mem_factorization Nat.mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factorization Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factorization Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.le_of_mem_factorization Nat.le_of_mem_primeFactors
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff (n p : ℕ) :
n.factorization p = 0 ↔ ¬p.Prime ∨ ¬p ∣ n ∨ n = 0 := by
simp_rw [← not_mem_support_iff, support_factorization, mem_primeFactors, not_and_or, not_ne_iff]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = 0 := by simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hp]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : n.factorization p = 0 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 0 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_zero
#align nat.factorization_zero_right Nat.factorization_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
#align nat.factorization_one_right Nat.factorization_one_right
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_factors <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
#align nat.dvd_of_factorization_pos Nat.dvd_of_factorization_pos
theorem Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : p ∣ n) :
0 < n.factorization p := by
rwa [← factors_count_eq, count_pos_iff_mem, mem_factors_iff_dvd hn hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd Nat.Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hr : ¬p ∣ r) :
(p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
apply factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd
rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (Dvd.intro i rfl)]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero_iff.mp hr0).2
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff' Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem factorization_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).factorization = a.factorization + b.factorization := by
ext p
simp only [add_apply, ← factors_count_eq, perm_iff_count.mp (perm_factors_mul ha hb) p,
count_append]
#align nat.factorization_mul Nat.factorization_mul
#align nat.factorization_mul_support Nat.primeFactors_mul
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
#align nat.prod_factorization_eq_prod_factors Nat.prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
theorem factorization_prod {α : Type*} {S : Finset α} {g : α → ℕ} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ≠ 0) :
(S.prod g).factorization = S.sum fun x => (g x).factorization := by
classical
ext p
refine Finset.induction_on' S ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro x T hxS hTS hxT IH
have hT : T.prod g ≠ 0 := prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr fun x hx => hS x (hTS hx)
simp [prod_insert hxT, sum_insert hxT, ← IH, factorization_mul (hS x hxS) hT]
#align nat.factorization_prod Nat.factorization_prod
@[simp]
theorem factorization_pow (n k : ℕ) : factorization (n ^ k) = k • n.factorization := by
induction' k with k ih; · simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [Nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, factorization_mul hn (pow_ne_zero _ hn), ih,
add_smul, one_smul, add_comm]
#align nat.factorization_pow Nat.factorization_pow
@[simp]
protected theorem Prime.factorization {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization = single p 1 := by
ext q
rw [← factors_count_eq, factors_prime hp, single_apply, count_singleton', if_congr eq_comm] <;>
rfl
#align nat.prime.factorization Nat.Prime.factorization
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_self Nat.Prime.factorization_self
theorem Prime.factorization_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : (p ^ k).factorization = single p k := by
simp [hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_pow Nat.Prime.factorization_pow
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
-- Porting note: explicitly added `Finsupp.prod_single_index`
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
simp
#align nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single Nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
#align nat.prime.eq_of_factorization_pos Nat.Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos
theorem prod_pow_factorization_eq_self {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ f.support → Prime p) :
(f.prod (· ^ ·)).factorization = f := by
have h : ∀ x : ℕ, x ∈ f.support → x ^ f x ≠ 0 := fun p hp =>
pow_ne_zero _ (Prime.ne_zero (hf p hp))
simp only [Finsupp.prod, factorization_prod h]
conv =>
rhs
rw [(sum_single f).symm]
exact sum_congr rfl fun p hp => Prime.factorization_pow (hf p hp)
#align nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self Nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
#align nat.eq_factorization_iff Nat.eq_factorization_iff
def factorizationEquiv : ℕ+ ≃ { f : ℕ →₀ ℕ | ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p } where
toFun := fun ⟨n, _⟩ => ⟨n.factorization, fun _ => prime_of_mem_primeFactors⟩
invFun := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
⟨f.prod _, prod_pow_pos_of_zero_not_mem_support fun H => not_prime_zero (hf 0 H)⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => Subtype.ext <| factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hx.ne.symm
right_inv := fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => Subtype.ext <| prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf
#align nat.factorization_equiv Nat.factorizationEquiv
theorem factorizationEquiv_apply (n : ℕ+) : (factorizationEquiv n).1 = n.1.factorization := by
cases n
rfl
#align nat.factorization_equiv_apply Nat.factorizationEquiv_apply
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
#align nat.factorization_equiv_inv_apply Nat.factorizationEquiv_inv_apply
-- Porting note: Lean 4 thinks we need `HPow` without this
set_option quotPrecheck false in
notation "ord_proj[" p "] " n:arg => p ^ Nat.factorization n p
notation "ord_compl[" p "] " n:arg => n / ord_proj[p] n
@[simp]
theorem ord_proj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ord_proj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
#align nat.ord_proj_of_not_prime Nat.ord_proj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ord_compl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ord_compl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
#align nat.ord_compl_of_not_prime Nat.ord_compl_of_not_prime
theorem ord_proj_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ord_proj[p] n ∣ n := by
if hp : p.Prime then ?_ else simp [hp]
rw [← factors_count_eq]
apply dvd_of_factors_subperm (pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero)
rw [hp.factors_pow, List.subperm_ext_iff]
intro q hq
simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hq]
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd
theorem ord_proj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ord_proj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
#align nat.ord_proj_pos Nat.ord_proj_pos
theorem ord_proj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ord_proj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_proj_le Nat.ord_proj_le
theorem ord_compl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ord_compl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p hn) (ord_proj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
#align nat.ord_compl_pos Nat.ord_compl_pos
theorem ord_compl_le (n p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
#align nat.ord_compl_le Nat.ord_compl_le
theorem ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ord_proj[p] n * ord_compl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self Nat.ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self
theorem ord_proj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ord_proj[p] (a * b) = ord_proj[p] a * ord_proj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
#align nat.ord_proj_mul Nat.ord_proj_mul
theorem ord_compl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] (a * b) = ord_compl[p] a * ord_compl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ord_proj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ord_proj_dvd a p) (ord_proj_dvd b p)]
#align nat.ord_compl_mul Nat.ord_compl_mul
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_factorization Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactors
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ord_proj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
lt_pow_self pp.one_lt _
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
#align nat.factorization_lt Nat.factorization_lt
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ord_proj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
#align nat.factorization_le_of_le_pow Nat.factorization_le_of_le_pow
theorem factorization_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
d.factorization ≤ n.factorization ↔ d ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro hdn
set K := n.factorization - d.factorization with hK
use K.prod (· ^ ·)
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, ← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hd,
← Finsupp.prod_add_index' pow_zero pow_add, hK, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hdn]
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [factorization_mul hd (right_ne_zero_of_mul hn)]
simp
#align nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
#align nat.factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd Nat.factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd
theorem pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : p.Prime) :
¬p ^ (n.factorization p + 1) ∣ n := by
intro h
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos hp.pos _).ne' hn] at h
simpa [hp.factorization] using h p
#align nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd Nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
#align nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_left Nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_left
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
#align nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_right Nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_right
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
#align nat.prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization Nat.Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ord_proj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
#align nat.prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj Nat.Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
#align nat.exists_factorization_lt_of_lt Nat.exists_factorization_lt_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
#align nat.factorization_div Nat.factorization_div
theorem dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ord_proj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
#align nat.dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd Nat.dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ord_compl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ord_compl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ord_compl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ord_proj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
#align nat.not_dvd_ord_compl Nat.not_dvd_ord_compl
theorem coprime_ord_compl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ord_compl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ord_compl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
#align nat.coprime_ord_compl Nat.coprime_ord_compl
theorem factorization_ord_compl (n p : ℕ) :
(ord_compl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
-- Porting note: needed to solve side goal explicitly
rw [Finsupp.erase_of_not_mem_support] <;> simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ord_compl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ord_proj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
#align nat.factorization_ord_compl Nat.factorization_ord_compl
-- `ord_compl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ord_compl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ord_compl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ord_compl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
#align nat.dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd Nat.dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
multiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
(multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩)
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
#align nat.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd Nat.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := fun H => Nat.lt_asymm hd_lt_n ((Nat.div_eq_zero_iff hd.bot_lt).mp H)
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
cases' exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2) with p hp
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
#align nat.dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub Nat.dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub
theorem ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ord_proj[p] a ∣ ord_proj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd
theorem ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ord_proj[p] a ∣ ord_proj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ord_compl[p] a ∣ ord_compl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p ha0) (ord_proj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p hb0) (ord_proj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ord_compl a p, factorization_ord_compl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ord_compl[p] a ∣ ord_compl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (lt_two_pow n).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ord_proj_dvd _ _)
#align nat.dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd Nat.dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
simpa [prod_factors hn] using Multiset.toFinset_prod_dvd_prod (n.factors : Multiset ℕ)
#align nat.prod_prime_factors_dvd Nat.prod_primeFactors_dvd
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.factors ∧ p ∈ b.factors := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_factors this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
#align nat.factorization_gcd Nat.factorization_gcd
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
#align nat.factorization_lcm Nat.factorization_lcm
def factorizationLCMLeft (a b : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(Nat.lcm a b).factorization.prod fun p n ↦
if b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p then p ^ n else 1
def factorizationLCMRight (a b : ℕ) :=
(Nat.lcm a b).factorization.prod fun p n ↦
if b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p then 1 else p ^ n
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
#align nat.prod_factors_gcd_mul_prod_factors_mul Nat.prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul
#align nat.sum_factors_gcd_add_sum_factors_mul Nat.sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
#align nat.set_of_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization Nat.setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = (Ico 1 n).filter fun i : ℕ => p ^ i ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
#align nat.Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd Nat.Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = ((Ico 1 n).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n).card := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
#align nat.factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd Nat.factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
((Ico 1 n).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n) = (Icc 1 b).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
#align nat.Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq Nat.Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq
theorem factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p + b.factorization p := by
simp only [← factors_count_eq, perm_iff_count.mp (perm_factors_mul_of_coprime hab), count_append]
#align nat.factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime Nat.factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime
theorem factorization_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).factorization = a.factorization + b.factorization := by
ext q
rw [Finsupp.add_apply, factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab]
#align nat.factorization_mul_of_coprime Nat.factorization_mul_of_coprime
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 822 | 825 | theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) (hpa : p ∈ a.factors) :
(a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by |
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← factors_count_eq, ← factors_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_factors_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Congruence
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.quotient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
universe u v w
namespace Ideal
open Set
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R) {a b : R}
variable {S : Type v}
-- Note that at present `Ideal` means a left-ideal,
-- so this quotient is only useful in a commutative ring.
-- We should develop quotients by two-sided ideals as well.
@[instance] abbrev instHasQuotient : HasQuotient R (Ideal R) :=
Submodule.hasQuotient
namespace Quotient
variable {I} {x y : R}
instance one (I : Ideal R) : One (R ⧸ I) :=
⟨Submodule.Quotient.mk 1⟩
#align ideal.quotient.has_one Ideal.Quotient.one
protected def ringCon (I : Ideal R) : RingCon R :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.con I.toAddSubgroup with
mul' := fun {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂} h₁ h₂ => by
rw [Submodule.quotientRel_r_def] at h₁ h₂ ⊢
have F := I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left a₂ h₁) (I.mul_mem_right b₁ h₂)
have : a₁ * a₂ - b₁ * b₂ = a₂ * (a₁ - b₁) + (a₂ - b₂) * b₁ := by
rw [mul_sub, sub_mul, sub_add_sub_cancel, mul_comm, mul_comm b₁]
rwa [← this] at F }
#align ideal.quotient.ring_con Ideal.Quotient.ringCon
instance commRing (I : Ideal R) : CommRing (R ⧸ I) :=
inferInstanceAs (CommRing (Quotient.ringCon I).Quotient)
#align ideal.quotient.comm_ring Ideal.Quotient.commRing
-- Sanity test to make sure no diamonds have emerged in `commRing`
example : (commRing I).toAddCommGroup = Submodule.Quotient.addCommGroup I := rfl
-- this instance is harder to find than the one via `Algebra α (R ⧸ I)`, so use a lower priority
instance (priority := 100) isScalarTower_right {α} [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] :
IsScalarTower α (R ⧸ I) (R ⧸ I) :=
(Quotient.ringCon I).isScalarTower_right
#align ideal.quotient.is_scalar_tower_right Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
instance smulCommClass {α} [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] [SMulCommClass α R R] :
SMulCommClass α (R ⧸ I) (R ⧸ I) :=
(Quotient.ringCon I).smulCommClass
#align ideal.quotient.smul_comm_class Ideal.Quotient.smulCommClass
instance smulCommClass' {α} [SMul α R] [IsScalarTower α R R] [SMulCommClass R α R] :
SMulCommClass (R ⧸ I) α (R ⧸ I) :=
(Quotient.ringCon I).smulCommClass'
#align ideal.quotient.smul_comm_class' Ideal.Quotient.smulCommClass'
def mk (I : Ideal R) : R →+* R ⧸ I where
toFun a := Submodule.Quotient.mk a
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
#align ideal.quotient.mk Ideal.Quotient.mk
instance {I : Ideal R} : Coe R (R ⧸ I) :=
⟨Ideal.Quotient.mk I⟩
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext [NonAssocSemiring S] ⦃f g : R ⧸ I →+* S⦄ (h : f.comp (mk I) = g.comp (mk I)) :
f = g :=
RingHom.ext fun x => Quotient.inductionOn' x <| (RingHom.congr_fun h : _)
#align ideal.quotient.ring_hom_ext Ideal.Quotient.ringHom_ext
instance inhabited : Inhabited (R ⧸ I) :=
⟨mk I 37⟩
#align ideal.quotient.inhabited Ideal.Quotient.inhabited
protected theorem eq : mk I x = mk I y ↔ x - y ∈ I :=
Submodule.Quotient.eq I
#align ideal.quotient.eq Ideal.Quotient.eq
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk (x : R) : (Submodule.Quotient.mk x : R ⧸ I) = mk I x := rfl
#align ideal.quotient.mk_eq_mk Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk
theorem eq_zero_iff_mem {I : Ideal R} : mk I a = 0 ↔ a ∈ I :=
Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero _
#align ideal.quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem
theorem eq_zero_iff_dvd (x y : R) : Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span ({x} : Set R)) y = 0 ↔ x ∣ y := by
rw [Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
@[simp]
lemma mk_singleton_self (x : R) : mk (Ideal.span {x}) x = 0 := by
rw [eq_zero_iff_dvd]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem (x y : R) : mk I x = mk I y ↔ x - y ∈ I := by
rw [← eq_zero_iff_mem, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem zero_eq_one_iff {I : Ideal R} : (0 : R ⧸ I) = 1 ↔ I = ⊤ :=
eq_comm.trans <| eq_zero_iff_mem.trans (eq_top_iff_one _).symm
#align ideal.quotient.zero_eq_one_iff Ideal.Quotient.zero_eq_one_iff
theorem zero_ne_one_iff {I : Ideal R} : (0 : R ⧸ I) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ ⊤ :=
not_congr zero_eq_one_iff
#align ideal.quotient.zero_ne_one_iff Ideal.Quotient.zero_ne_one_iff
protected theorem nontrivial {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ ⊤) : Nontrivial (R ⧸ I) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, zero_ne_one_iff.2 hI⟩⟩
#align ideal.quotient.nontrivial Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Quotient.lean | 152 | 154 | theorem subsingleton_iff {I : Ideal R} : Subsingleton (R ⧸ I) ↔ I = ⊤ := by |
rw [eq_top_iff_one, ← subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one, eq_comm, ← (mk I).map_one,
Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Zlattice.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Embeddings
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.FractionalIdeal
#align_import number_theory.number_field.canonical_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60da01b41bbe4206f05d34fd70c8dd7498717a30"
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace FiniteDimensional Finset
local notation "E" K =>
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
noncomputable def _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding : K →+* (E K) :=
RingHom.prod (Pi.ringHom fun w => embedding_of_isReal w.prop)
(Pi.ringHom fun w => w.val.embedding)
instance [NumberField K] : Nontrivial (E K) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
obtain hw | hw := w.isReal_or_isComplex
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_left
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_right
protected theorem finrank [NumberField K] : finrank ℝ (E K) = finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [finrank_prod, finrank_pi, finrank_pi_fintype, Complex.finrank_real_complex, sum_const,
card_univ, ← NrRealPlaces, ← NrComplexPlaces, ← card_real_embeddings, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm, ← card_complex_embeddings, ← NumberField.Embeddings.card K ℂ,
Fintype.card_subtype_compl, Nat.add_sub_of_le (Fintype.card_subtype_le _)]
theorem _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.mixedEmbedding K) := by
exact RingHom.injective _
noncomputable section norm
open scoped Classical
variable {K}
def normAtPlace (w : InfinitePlace K) : (E K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := if hw : IsReal w then ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ else ‖x.2 ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩‖
map_zero' := by simp
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' x y := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_nonneg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : E K) :
0 ≤ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_nonneg _
theorem normAtPlace_neg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : E K) :
normAtPlace w (- x) = normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_add_le (w : InfinitePlace K) (x y : E K) :
normAtPlace w (x + y) ≤ normAtPlace w x + normAtPlace w y := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_add_le _ _
theorem normAtPlace_smul (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : E K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w (c • x) = |c| * normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs
· rw [Prod.smul_fst, Pi.smul_apply, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
· rw [Prod.smul_snd, Pi.smul_apply, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, Complex.norm_eq_abs]
theorem normAtPlace_real (w : InfinitePlace K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (E K)) = |c| := by
rw [show ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (E K)) = c • 1 by ext <;> simp, normAtPlace_smul, map_one,
mul_one]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : E K):
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, dif_pos]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) (x : E K) :
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.2 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
dif_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr hw)]
@[simp]
theorem normAtPlace_apply (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
normAtPlace w (mixedEmbedding K x) = w x := by
simp_rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, mixedEmbedding,
RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply, norm_embedding_of_isReal, norm_embedding_eq, dite_eq_ite,
ite_id]
theorem normAtPlace_eq_zero {x : E K} :
(∀ w, normAtPlace w x = 0) ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· ext w
· exact norm_eq_zero'.mp (normAtPlace_apply_isReal w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· exact norm_eq_zero'.mp (normAtPlace_apply_isComplex w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· simp_rw [h, map_zero, implies_true]
variable [NumberField K]
theorem nnnorm_eq_sup_normAtPlace (x : E K) :
‖x‖₊ = univ.sup fun w ↦ ⟨normAtPlace w x, normAtPlace_nonneg w x⟩ := by
rw [show (univ : Finset (InfinitePlace K)) = (univ.image
(fun w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} ↦ w.1)) ∪
(univ.image (fun w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} ↦ w.1))
by ext; simp [isReal_or_isComplex], sup_union, univ.sup_image, univ.sup_image, sup_eq_max,
Prod.nnnorm_def', Pi.nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr
· ext w
simp [normAtPlace_apply_isReal w.prop]
· ext w
simp [normAtPlace_apply_isComplex w.prop]
theorem norm_eq_sup'_normAtPlace (x : E K) :
‖x‖ = univ.sup' univ_nonempty fun w ↦ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_eq_sup_normAtPlace, ← sup'_eq_sup univ_nonempty, ← NNReal.val_eq_coe,
← OrderHom.Subtype.val_coe, map_finset_sup', OrderHom.Subtype.val_coe]
rfl
protected def norm : (E K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := ∏ w, (normAtPlace w x) ^ (mult w)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_pow, prod_const_one]
map_zero' := by simp [mult]
map_mul' _ _ := by simp only [map_mul, mul_pow, prod_mul_distrib]
protected theorem norm_apply (x : E K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = ∏ w, (normAtPlace w x) ^ (mult w) := rfl
protected theorem norm_nonneg (x : E K) :
0 ≤ mixedEmbedding.norm x := univ.prod_nonneg fun _ _ ↦ pow_nonneg (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _) _
protected theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {x : E K} :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = 0 ↔ ∃ w, normAtPlace w x = 0 := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, prod_eq_zero_iff,
mem_univ, true_and, pow_eq_zero_iff mult_ne_zero]
protected theorem norm_ne_zero_iff {x : E K} :
mixedEmbedding.norm x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ w, normAtPlace w x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp_rw [ne_eq, mixedEmbedding.norm_eq_zero_iff, not_not, not_forall, not_not]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/Basic.lean | 356 | 359 | theorem norm_smul (c : ℝ) (x : E K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm (c • x) = |c| ^ finrank ℚ K * (mixedEmbedding.norm x) := by |
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm_apply, normAtPlace_smul, mul_pow, prod_mul_distrib,
prod_pow_eq_pow_sum, sum_mult_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).reverse = p.reverse.copy hv hu := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_copy
@[simp]
theorem reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).reverse = q.reverse.append p.reverse := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).reverse = cons (G.symm h) p.reverse := by simp [concat_eq_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_concat
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).length = 0 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).length = p.length + 1 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons
@[simp]
theorem length_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).length = p.length := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.length_copy
@[simp]
theorem length_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_append SimpleGraph.Walk.length_append
@[simp]
theorem length_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).length = p.length + 1 := length_append _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.length_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.length_concat
@[simp]
protected theorem length_reverseAux {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
(p.reverseAux q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverseAux
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.length = p.length := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverse
theorem eq_of_length_eq_zero {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 0 → u = v
| nil, _ => rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero
theorem adj_of_length_eq_one {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 1 → G.Adj u v
| cons h nil, _ => h
@[simp]
theorem exists_length_eq_zero_iff {u v : V} : (∃ p : G.Walk u v, p.length = 0) ↔ u = v := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact eq_of_length_eq_zero hp
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨nil, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {u : V} {p : G.Walk u u} : p.length = 0 ↔ p = nil := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.length_eq_zero_iff
theorem getVert_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (i : ℕ) :
(p.append q).getVert i = if i < p.length then p.getVert i else q.getVert (i - p.length) := by
induction p generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons h p ih => cases i <;> simp [getVert, ih, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
theorem getVert_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (i : ℕ) :
p.reverse.getVert i = p.getVert (p.length - i) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [reverse_cons, getVert_append, length_reverse, ih, length_cons]
split_ifs
next hi =>
rw [Nat.succ_sub hi.le]
simp [getVert]
next hi =>
obtain rfl | hi' := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_not_lt hi
· simp [getVert]
· rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hi') rfl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hi']
simp [getVert]
theorem concat_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v u) : p.concat h ≠ nil := by
cases p <;> simp [concat]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_ne_nil
theorem concat_inj {u v v' w : V} {p : G.Walk u v} {h : G.Adj v w} {p' : G.Walk u v'}
{h' : G.Adj v' w} (he : p.concat h = p'.concat h') : ∃ hv : v = v', p.copy rfl hv = p' := by
induction p with
| nil =>
cases p'
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
simp only [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he.symm
| cons _ _ ih =>
rw [concat_cons] at he
cases p'
· exfalso
simp only [concat_nil, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
exact concat_ne_nil _ _ he
· rw [concat_cons, cons.injEq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, he⟩ := he
rw [heq_iff_eq] at he
obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := ih he
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_inj SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_inj
def support {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List V
| nil => [u]
| cons _ p => u :: p.support
#align simple_graph.walk.support SimpleGraph.Walk.support
def darts {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → List G.Dart
| nil => []
| cons h p => ⟨(u, _), h⟩ :: p.darts
#align simple_graph.walk.darts SimpleGraph.Walk.darts
def edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : List (Sym2 V) := p.darts.map Dart.edge
#align simple_graph.walk.edges SimpleGraph.Walk.edges
@[simp]
theorem support_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).support = [u] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nil
@[simp]
theorem support_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).support = u :: p.support := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_cons
@[simp]
theorem support_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).support = p.support.concat w := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.support_concat
@[simp]
theorem support_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).support = p.support := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.support_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.support_copy
theorem support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support = p.support ++ p'.support.tail := by
induction p <;> cases p' <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.support_append
@[simp]
theorem support_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.support = p.support.reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [support_append, *]
#align simple_graph.walk.support_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.support_reverse
@[simp]
theorem support_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support ≠ [] := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_ne_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.support_ne_nil
theorem tail_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').support.tail = p.support.tail ++ p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, List.tail_append_of_ne_nil _ _ (support_ne_nil _)]
#align simple_graph.walk.tail_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.tail_support_append
theorem support_eq_cons {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support = u :: p.support.tail := by
cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.support_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.support_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem start_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.support := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.start_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.start_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support := by induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_support SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_support
@[simp]
theorem support_nonempty {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : { w | w ∈ p.support }.Nonempty :=
⟨u, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.support_nonempty SimpleGraph.Walk.support_nonempty
theorem mem_support_iff {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
w ∈ p.support ↔ w = u ∨ w ∈ p.support.tail := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_iff
theorem mem_support_nil_iff {u v : V} : u ∈ (nil : G.Walk v v).support ↔ u = v := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_nil_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_nil_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_tail_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support.tail ↔ t ∈ p.support.tail ∨ t ∈ p'.support.tail := by
rw [tail_support_append, List.mem_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_tail_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem end_mem_tail_support_of_ne {u v : V} (h : u ≠ v) (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.support.tail := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_cons_of_ne h p
simp
#align simple_graph.walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.end_mem_tail_support_of_ne
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem mem_support_append_iff {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
t ∈ (p.append p').support ↔ t ∈ p.support ∨ t ∈ p'.support := by
simp only [mem_support_iff, mem_tail_support_append_iff]
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne t v <;> obtain rfl | h' := eq_or_ne t u <;>
-- this `have` triggers the unusedHavesSuffices linter:
(try have := h'.symm) <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_support_append_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_support_append_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_left {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : p.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
simp only [Walk.support_append, List.subset_append_left]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_left SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_support_append_right {V : Type u} {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v w : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) : q.support ⊆ (p.append q).support := by
intro h
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_support_append_iff, or_true_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align simple_graph.walk.subset_support_append_right SimpleGraph.Walk.subset_support_append_right
theorem coe_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail := by cases p <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support
theorem coe_support_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = {u} + p.support.tail + p'.support.tail := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add, coe_support]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append
theorem coe_support_append' [DecidableEq V] {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
((p.append p').support : Multiset V) = p.support + p'.support - {v} := by
rw [support_append, ← Multiset.coe_add]
simp only [coe_support]
rw [add_comm ({v} : Multiset V)]
simp only [← add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align simple_graph.walk.coe_support_append' SimpleGraph.Walk.coe_support_append'
theorem chain_adj_support {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk v w), List.Chain G.Adj u p.support
| nil => List.Chain.cons h List.Chain.nil
| cons h' p => List.Chain.cons h (chain_adj_support h' p)
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_adj_support
theorem chain'_adj_support {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.Adj p.support
| nil => List.Chain.nil
| cons h p => chain_adj_support h p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_adj_support SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_adj_support
theorem chain_dartAdj_darts {d : G.Dart} {v w : V} (h : d.snd = v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
List.Chain G.DartAdj d p.darts := by
induction p generalizing d with
| nil => exact List.Chain.nil
-- Porting note: needed to defer `h` and `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h' p ih => exact List.Chain.cons (by exact h) (ih (by rfl))
#align simple_graph.walk.chain_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain_dartAdj_darts
theorem chain'_dartAdj_darts {u v : V} : ∀ (p : G.Walk u v), List.Chain' G.DartAdj p.darts
| nil => trivial
-- Porting note: needed to defer `rfl` to help elaboration
| cons h p => chain_dartAdj_darts (by rfl) p
#align simple_graph.walk.chain'_dart_adj_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.chain'_dartAdj_darts
theorem edges_subset_edgeSet {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) ⦃e : Sym2 V⦄, e ∈ p.edges → e ∈ G.edgeSet
| cons h' p', e, h => by
cases h
· exact h'
next h' => exact edges_subset_edgeSet p' h'
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_subset_edge_set SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_subset_edgeSet
theorem adj_of_mem_edges {u v x y : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : s(x, y) ∈ p.edges) : G.Adj x y :=
edges_subset_edgeSet p h
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_of_mem_edges
@[simp]
theorem darts_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).darts = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nil
@[simp]
theorem darts_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).darts = ⟨(u, v), h⟩ :: p.darts := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_cons
@[simp]
theorem darts_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).darts = p.darts.concat ⟨(v, w), h⟩ := by
induction p <;> simp [*, concat_nil]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_concat
@[simp]
theorem darts_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).darts = p.darts := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_copy
@[simp]
theorem darts_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').darts = p.darts ++ p'.darts := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_append
@[simp]
theorem darts_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.reverse.darts = (p.darts.map Dart.symm).reverse := by
induction p <;> simp [*, Sym2.eq_swap]
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_reverse
theorem mem_darts_reverse {u v : V} {d : G.Dart} {p : G.Walk u v} :
d ∈ p.reverse.darts ↔ d.symm ∈ p.darts := by simp
#align simple_graph.walk.mem_darts_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.mem_darts_reverse
theorem cons_map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : (u :: p.darts.map (·.snd)) = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_map_snd_darts
theorem map_snd_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.snd) = p.support.tail := by
simpa using congr_arg List.tail (cons_map_snd_darts p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_snd_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_snd_darts
theorem map_fst_darts_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) :
p.darts.map (·.fst) ++ [v] = p.support := by
induction p <;> simp! [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts_append SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts_append
theorem map_fst_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.map (·.fst) = p.support.dropLast := by
simpa! using congr_arg List.dropLast (map_fst_darts_append p)
#align simple_graph.walk.map_fst_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.map_fst_darts
@[simp]
theorem edges_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).edges = [] := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nil
@[simp]
theorem edges_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).edges = s(u, v) :: p.edges := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_cons
@[simp]
theorem edges_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).edges = p.edges.concat s(v, w) := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_concat
@[simp]
theorem edges_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).edges = p.edges := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_copy
@[simp]
theorem edges_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (p' : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append p').edges = p.edges ++ p'.edges := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_append SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_append
@[simp]
theorem edges_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.edges = p.edges.reverse := by
simp [edges, List.map_reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_support {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.support.length = p.length + 1 := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_support SimpleGraph.Walk.length_support
@[simp]
theorem length_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.darts.length = p.length := by
induction p <;> simp [*]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.length_darts
@[simp]
theorem length_edges {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.edges.length = p.length := by simp [edges]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.length_edges
theorem dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}, d ∈ p.darts → d.fst ∈ p.support
| cons h p', d, hd => by
simp only [support_cons, darts_cons, List.mem_cons] at hd ⊢
rcases hd with (rfl | hd)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) {d : G.Dart}
(h : d ∈ p.darts) : d.snd ∈ p.support := by
simpa using p.reverse.dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts (by simp [h] : d.symm ∈ p.reverse.darts)
#align simple_graph.walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts SimpleGraph.Walk.dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts
theorem fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
t ∈ p.support := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, he⟩ := List.mem_map.mp he
rw [dart_edge_eq_mk'_iff'] at he
rcases he with (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
· exact dart_snd_mem_support_of_mem_darts _ hd
#align simple_graph.walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges {t u v w : V} (p : G.Walk v w) (he : s(t, u) ∈ p.edges) :
u ∈ p.support := by
rw [Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact p.fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges he
#align simple_graph.walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges SimpleGraph.Walk.snd_mem_support_of_mem_edges
theorem darts_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.darts.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [darts_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (dart_fst_mem_support_of_mem_darts p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.darts_nodup_of_support_nodup
theorem edges_nodup_of_support_nodup {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) :
p.edges.Nodup := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ p' ih =>
simp only [edges_cons, support_cons, List.nodup_cons] at h ⊢
exact ⟨fun h' => h.1 (fst_mem_support_of_mem_edges p' h'), ih h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup SimpleGraph.Walk.edges_nodup_of_support_nodup
inductive Nil : {v w : V} → G.Walk v w → Prop
| nil {u : V} : Nil (nil : G.Walk u u)
variable {u v w : V}
@[simp] lemma nil_nil : (nil : G.Walk u u).Nil := Nil.nil
@[simp] lemma not_nil_cons {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} : ¬ (cons h p).Nil := nofun
instance (p : G.Walk v w) : Decidable p.Nil :=
match p with
| nil => isTrue .nil
| cons _ _ => isFalse nofun
protected lemma Nil.eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil → v = w | .nil => rfl
lemma not_nil_of_ne {p : G.Walk v w} : v ≠ w → ¬ p.Nil := mt Nil.eq
lemma nil_iff_support_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.support = [v] := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma nil_iff_length_eq {p : G.Walk v w} : p.Nil ↔ p.length = 0 := by
cases p <;> simp
lemma not_nil_iff {p : G.Walk v w} :
¬ p.Nil ↔ ∃ (u : V) (h : G.Adj v u) (q : G.Walk u w), p = cons h q := by
cases p <;> simp [*]
lemma nil_iff_eq_nil : ∀ {p : G.Walk v v}, p.Nil ↔ p = nil
| .nil | .cons _ _ => by simp
alias ⟨Nil.eq_nil, _⟩ := nil_iff_eq_nil
@[elab_as_elim]
def notNilRec {motive : {u w : V} → (p : G.Walk u w) → (h : ¬ p.Nil) → Sort*}
(cons : {u v w : V} → (h : G.Adj u v) → (q : G.Walk v w) → motive (cons h q) not_nil_cons)
(p : G.Walk u w) : (hp : ¬ p.Nil) → motive p hp :=
match p with
| nil => fun hp => absurd .nil hp
| .cons h q => fun _ => cons h q
def sndOfNotNil (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : V :=
p.notNilRec (@fun _ u _ _ _ => u) hp
@[simp] lemma adj_sndOfNotNil {p : G.Walk v w} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
G.Adj v (p.sndOfNotNil hp) :=
p.notNilRec (fun h _ => h) hp
def tail (p : G.Walk u v) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Walk (p.sndOfNotNil hp) v :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ q => q) hp
@[simps]
def firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) : G.Dart where
fst := v
snd := p.sndOfNotNil hp
adj := p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp
lemma edge_firstDart (p : G.Walk v w) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.firstDart hp).edge = s(v, p.sndOfNotNil hp) := rfl
variable {x y : V} -- TODO: rename to u, v, w instead?
@[simp] lemma cons_tail_eq (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
cons (p.adj_sndOfNotNil hp) (p.tail hp) = p :=
p.notNilRec (fun _ _ => rfl) hp
@[simp] lemma cons_support_tail (p : G.Walk x y) (hp : ¬p.Nil) :
x :: (p.tail hp).support = p.support := by
rw [← support_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma length_tail_add_one {p : G.Walk x y} (hp : ¬ p.Nil) :
(p.tail hp).length + 1 = p.length := by
rw [← length_cons, cons_tail_eq]
@[simp] lemma nil_copy {x' y' : V} {p : G.Walk x y} (hx : x = x') (hy : y = y') :
(p.copy hx hy).Nil = p.Nil := by
subst_vars; rfl
@[simp] lemma support_tail (p : G.Walk v v) (hp) :
(p.tail hp).support = p.support.tail := by
rw [← cons_support_tail p hp, List.tail_cons]
@[mk_iff isTrail_def]
structure IsTrail {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : Prop where
edges_nodup : p.edges.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_def
structure IsPath {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsPath.isTrail {p : Walk G u v}(h : IsPath p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.isTrail
@[mk_iff isCircuit_def]
structure IsCircuit {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsTrail p : Prop where
ne_nil : p ≠ nil
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_def
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_trail : is_trail p` in structure
protected lemma IsCircuit.isTrail {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCircuit p) : IsTrail p := h.toIsTrail
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit.to_trail SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCircuit.isTrail
structure IsCycle {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) extends IsCircuit p : Prop where
support_nodup : p.support.tail.Nodup
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle
-- Porting note: used to use `extends to_circuit : is_circuit p` in structure
protected lemma IsCycle.isCircuit {p : Walk G u u} (h : IsCycle p) : IsCircuit p := h.toIsCircuit
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle.to_circuit SimpleGraph.Walk.IsCycle.isCircuit
@[simp]
theorem isTrail_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isTrail_copy
theorem IsPath.mk' {u v : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : p.support.Nodup) : p.IsPath :=
⟨⟨edges_nodup_of_support_nodup h⟩, h⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path.mk' SimpleGraph.Walk.IsPath.mk'
theorem isPath_def {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.IsPath ↔ p.support.Nodup :=
⟨IsPath.support_nodup, IsPath.mk'⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_def
@[simp]
theorem isPath_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).IsPath ↔ p.IsPath := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_path_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isPath_copy
@[simp]
theorem isCircuit_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCircuit ↔ p.IsCircuit := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_circuit_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCircuit_copy
lemma IsCircuit.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCircuit p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
theorem isCycle_def {u : V} (p : G.Walk u u) :
p.IsCycle ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ p ≠ nil ∧ p.support.tail.Nodup :=
Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h.1.1, h.1.2, h.2⟩) fun h => ⟨⟨h.1, h.2.1⟩, h.2.2⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_def SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_def
@[simp]
theorem isCycle_copy {u u'} (p : G.Walk u u) (hu : u = u') :
(p.copy hu hu).IsCycle ↔ p.IsCycle := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.is_cycle_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.isCycle_copy
lemma IsCycle.not_nil {p : G.Walk v v} (hp : IsCycle p) : ¬ p.Nil := (hp.ne_nil ·.eq_nil)
@[simp]
theorem IsTrail.nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).IsTrail :=
⟨by simp [edges]⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.nil SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.nil
theorem IsTrail.of_cons {u v w : V} {h : G.Adj u v} {p : G.Walk v w} :
(cons h p).IsTrail → p.IsTrail := by simp [isTrail_def]
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.of_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.of_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_isTrail_iff {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail ∧ s(u, v) ∉ p.edges := by simp [isTrail_def, and_comm]
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_is_trail_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_isTrail_iff
theorem IsTrail.reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : p.IsTrail) : p.reverse.IsTrail := by
simpa [isTrail_def] using h
#align simple_graph.walk.is_trail.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.IsTrail.reverse
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 1,042 | 1,046 | theorem reverse_isTrail_iff {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.IsTrail ↔ p.IsTrail := by |
constructor <;>
· intro h
convert h.reverse _
try rw [reverse_reverse]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
#align real.tan_add Real.tan_add
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
#align real.tan_add' Real.tan_add'
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
#align real.tan_two_mul Real.tan_two_mul
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
#align real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two Real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
exact continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun x => id
#align real.continuous_on_tan Real.continuousOn_tan
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
#align real.continuous_tan Real.continuous_tan
theorem continuousOn_tan_Ioo : ContinuousOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
refine ContinuousOn.mono continuousOn_tan fun x => ?_
simp only [and_imp, mem_Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [cos_eq_zero_iff]
rintro hx_gt hx_lt ⟨r, hxr_eq⟩
rcases le_or_lt 0 r with h | h
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_lt
refine hx_lt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
simp [h]
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_gt
refine hx_gt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
have hr_le : r ≤ -1 := by rwa [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right] at h
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm, ← le_div_iff]
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg]; norm_cast
· exact zero_lt_two
#align real.continuous_on_tan_Ioo Real.continuousOn_tan_Ioo
theorem surjOn_tan : SurjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) univ :=
have := neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos
continuousOn_tan_Ioo.surjOn_of_tendsto (nonempty_Ioo.2 this)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot this]; exact tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop this]; exact tendsto_tan_pi_div_two)
#align real.surj_on_tan Real.surjOn_tan
theorem tan_surjective : Function.Surjective tan := fun _ => surjOn_tan.subset_range trivial
#align real.tan_surjective Real.tan_surjective
theorem image_tan_Ioo : tan '' Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1 surjOn_tan
#align real.image_tan_Ioo Real.image_tan_Ioo
def tanOrderIso : Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o ℝ :=
(strictMonoOn_tan.orderIso _ _).trans <|
(OrderIso.setCongr _ _ image_tan_Ioo).trans OrderIso.Set.univ
#align real.tan_order_iso Real.tanOrderIso
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
tanOrderIso.symm x
#align real.arctan Real.arctan
@[simp]
theorem tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
tanOrderIso.apply_symm_apply x
#align real.tan_arctan Real.tan_arctan
theorem arctan_mem_Ioo (x : ℝ) : arctan x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arctan_mem_Ioo Real.arctan_mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem range_arctan : range arctan = Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
((EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _).trans Subtype.range_coe
#align real.range_arctan Real.range_arctan
theorem arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| tanOrderIso.symm_apply_apply ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arctan_tan Real.arctan_tan
theorem cos_arctan_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < cos (arctan x) :=
cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x
#align real.cos_arctan_pos Real.cos_arctan_pos
theorem cos_sq_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) ^ 2 = 1 / (1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x).ne', tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_sq_arctan Real.cos_sq_arctan
theorem sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [← tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
#align real.sin_arctan Real.sin_arctan
theorem cos_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) = 1 / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_arctan Real.cos_arctan
theorem arctan_lt_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arctan x < π / 2 :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).2
#align real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) < arctan x :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan
theorem arctan_eq_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arctan x = arcsin (x / √(1 + x ^ 2)) :=
Eq.symm <| arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arctan x) (mem_Icc_of_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x)
#align real.arctan_eq_arcsin Real.arctan_eq_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_arctan {x : ℝ} (h : x ∈ Ioo (-(1 : ℝ)) 1) :
arcsin x = arctan (x / √(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw_mod_cast [arctan_eq_arcsin, div_pow, sq_sqrt, one_add_div, div_div, ← sqrt_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀, sub_add_cancel, sqrt_one, div_one] <;> simp at h <;> nlinarith [h.1, h.2]
#align real.arcsin_eq_arctan Real.arcsin_eq_arctan
@[simp]
theorem arctan_zero : arctan 0 = 0 := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin]
#align real.arctan_zero Real.arctan_zero
@[mono]
theorem arctan_strictMono : StrictMono arctan := tanOrderIso.symm.strictMono
theorem arctan_injective : arctan.Injective := arctan_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem arctan_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arctan x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
.trans (by rw [arctan_zero]) arctan_injective.eq_iff
theorem tendsto_arctan_atTop : Tendsto arctan atTop (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atTop.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atTop
theorem tendsto_arctan_atBot : Tendsto arctan atBot (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atBot.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atBot
theorem arctan_eq_of_tan_eq {x y : ℝ} (h : tan x = y) (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arctan y = x :=
injOn_tan (arctan_mem_Ioo _) hx (by rw [tan_arctan, h])
#align real.arctan_eq_of_tan_eq Real.arctan_eq_of_tan_eq
@[simp]
theorem arctan_one : arctan 1 = π / 4 :=
arctan_eq_of_tan_eq tan_pi_div_four <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.arctan_one Real.arctan_one
@[simp]
theorem arctan_neg (x : ℝ) : arctan (-x) = -arctan x := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin, neg_div]
#align real.arctan_neg Real.arctan_neg
theorem arctan_eq_arccos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arctan x = arccos (√(1 + x ^ 2))⁻¹ := by
rw [arctan_eq_arcsin, arccos_eq_arcsin]; swap; · exact inv_nonneg.2 (sqrt_nonneg _)
congr 1
rw_mod_cast [← sqrt_inv, sq_sqrt, ← one_div, one_sub_div, add_sub_cancel_left, sqrt_div,
sqrt_sq h]
all_goals positivity
#align real.arctan_eq_arccos Real.arctan_eq_arccos
-- The junk values for `arccos` and `sqrt` make this true even for `1 < x`.
theorem arccos_eq_arctan {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) : arccos x = arctan (√(1 - x ^ 2) / x) := by
rw [arccos, eq_comm]
refine arctan_eq_of_tan_eq ?_ ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw_mod_cast [tan_pi_div_two_sub, tan_arcsin, inv_div]
· linarith only [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x, pi_pos]
· linarith only [arcsin_pos.2 h]
#align real.arccos_eq_arctan Real.arccos_eq_arctan
theorem arctan_inv_of_pos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) : arctan x⁻¹ = π / 2 - arctan x := by
rw [← arctan_tan (x := _ - _), tan_pi_div_two_sub, tan_arctan]
· norm_num
exact (arctan_lt_pi_div_two x).trans (half_lt_self_iff.mpr pi_pos)
· rw [sub_lt_self_iff, ← arctan_zero]
exact tanOrderIso.symm.strictMono h
theorem arctan_inv_of_neg {x : ℝ} (h : x < 0) : arctan x⁻¹ = -(π / 2) - arctan x := by
have := arctan_inv_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr h)
rwa [inv_neg, arctan_neg, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, neg_sub', arctan_neg, neg_neg] at this
section ArctanAdd
lemma arctan_ne_mul_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : ∀ (k : ℤ), arctan x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
by_contra!
obtain ⟨k, h⟩ := this
obtain ⟨lb, ub⟩ := arctan_mem_Ioo x
rw [h, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, mul_div_assoc, mul_lt_mul_right (by positivity)] at lb
rw [h, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, mul_lt_mul_right (by positivity)] at ub
norm_cast at lb ub; change -1 < _ at lb; omega
lemma arctan_add_arctan_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (h : x * y < 1) : arctan x + arctan y < π / 2 := by
cases' le_or_lt y 0 with hy hy
· rw [← add_zero (π / 2), ← arctan_zero]
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (arctan_lt_pi_div_two _) (tanOrderIso.symm.monotone hy)
· rw [← lt_div_iff hy, ← inv_eq_one_div] at h
replace h : arctan x < arctan y⁻¹ := tanOrderIso.symm.strictMono h
rwa [arctan_inv_of_pos hy, lt_tsub_iff_right] at h
theorem arctan_add {x y : ℝ} (h : x * y < 1) :
arctan x + arctan y = arctan ((x + y) / (1 - x * y)) := by
rw [← arctan_tan (x := _ + _)]
· congr
conv_rhs => rw [← tan_arctan x, ← tan_arctan y]
exact tan_add' ⟨arctan_ne_mul_pi_div_two, arctan_ne_mul_pi_div_two⟩
· rw [neg_lt, neg_add, ← arctan_neg, ← arctan_neg]
rw [← neg_mul_neg] at h
exact arctan_add_arctan_lt_pi_div_two h
· exact arctan_add_arctan_lt_pi_div_two h
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 258 | 268 | theorem arctan_add_eq_add_pi {x y : ℝ} (h : 1 < x * y) (hx : 0 < x) :
arctan x + arctan y = arctan ((x + y) / (1 - x * y)) + π := by |
have hy : 0 < y := by
have := mul_pos_iff.mp (zero_lt_one.trans h)
simpa [hx, hx.asymm]
have k := arctan_add (mul_inv x y ▸ inv_lt_one h)
rw [arctan_inv_of_pos hx, arctan_inv_of_pos hy, show _ + _ = π - (arctan x + arctan y) by ring,
sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add', sub_eq_add_neg, ← arctan_neg, add_comm] at k
convert k.symm using 3
field_simp
rw [show -x + -y = -(x + y) by ring, show x * y - 1 = -(1 - x * y) by ring, neg_div_neg_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e00d81bdcbf77c8188bbd18f5524ddc3ed8cac6"
namespace Nat
--@[pp_nodot] porting note: unknown attribute
def log (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b then log b (n / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : n / b < n := div_lt_self ((Nat.zero_lt_one.trans h.2).trans_le h.1) h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.log Nat.log
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 0 ↔ n < b ∨ b ≤ 1 := by
rw [log, dite_eq_right_iff]
simp only [Nat.add_eq_zero_iff, Nat.one_ne_zero, and_false, imp_false, not_and_or, not_le, not_lt]
#align nat.log_eq_zero_iff Nat.log_eq_zero_iff
theorem log_of_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : n < b) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inl hb)
#align nat.log_of_lt Nat.log_of_lt
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n) : log b n = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (Or.inr hb)
#align nat.log_of_left_le_one Nat.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_pos_iff {b n : ℕ} : 0 < log b n ↔ b ≤ n ∧ 1 < b := by
rw [Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, log_eq_zero_iff, not_or, not_lt, not_le]
#align nat.log_pos_iff Nat.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hbn : b ≤ n) : 0 < log b n :=
log_pos_iff.2 ⟨hbn, hb⟩
#align nat.log_pos Nat.log_pos
theorem log_of_one_lt_of_le {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (hn : b ≤ n) : log b n = log b (n / b) + 1 := by
rw [log]
exact if_pos ⟨hn, h⟩
#align nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le Nat.log_of_one_lt_of_le
@[simp] lemma log_zero_left : ∀ n, log 0 n = 0 := log_of_left_le_one $ Nat.zero_le _
#align nat.log_zero_left Nat.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b 0 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (le_total 1 b)
#align nat.log_zero_right Nat.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ n, log 1 n = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align nat.log_one_left Nat.log_one_left
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b 1 = 0 :=
log_eq_zero_iff.2 (lt_or_le _ _)
#align nat.log_one_right Nat.log_one_right
theorem pow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) :
b ^ x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ log b y := by
induction' y using Nat.strong_induction_on with y ih generalizing x
cases x with
| zero => dsimp; omega
| succ x =>
rw [log]; split_ifs with h
· have b_pos : 0 < b := lt_of_succ_lt hb
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih (y / b) (div_lt_self
(Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hy) hb) (Nat.div_pos h.1 b_pos).ne', le_div_iff_mul_le b_pos,
pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm]
· exact iff_of_false (fun hby => h ⟨(le_self_pow x.succ_ne_zero _).trans hby, hb⟩)
(not_succ_le_zero _)
#align nat.pow_le_iff_le_log Nat.pow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_pow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x ↔ log b y < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy)
#align nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_iff_log_lt
theorem pow_le_of_le_log {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (h : x ≤ log b y) : b ^ x ≤ y := by
refine (le_or_lt b 1).elim (fun hb => ?_) fun hb => (pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).2 h
rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.le_zero] at h
rwa [h, Nat.pow_zero, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.pow_le_of_le_log Nat.pow_le_of_le_log
theorem le_log_of_pow_le {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (h : b ^ x ≤ y) : x ≤ log b y := by
rcases ne_or_eq y 0 with (hy | rfl)
exacts [(pow_le_iff_le_log hb hy).1 h, (h.not_lt (Nat.pow_pos (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb))).elim]
#align nat.le_log_of_pow_le Nat.le_log_of_pow_le
theorem pow_log_le_self (b : ℕ) {x : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x :=
pow_le_of_le_log hx le_rfl
#align nat.pow_log_le_self Nat.pow_log_le_self
theorem log_lt_of_lt_pow {b x y : ℕ} (hy : y ≠ 0) : y < b ^ x → log b y < x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (pow_le_of_le_log hy)
#align nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow Nat.log_lt_of_lt_pow
theorem lt_pow_of_log_lt {b x y : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : log b y < x → y < b ^ x :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (le_log_of_pow_le hb)
#align nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt Nat.lt_pow_of_log_lt
theorem lt_pow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : x < b ^ (log b x).succ :=
lt_pow_of_log_lt hb (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self
theorem log_eq_iff {b m n : ℕ} (h : m ≠ 0 ∨ 1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) :
log b n = m ↔ b ^ m ≤ n ∧ n < b ^ (m + 1) := by
rcases em (1 < b ∧ n ≠ 0) with (⟨hb, hn⟩ | hbn)
· rw [le_antisymm_iff, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← pow_le_iff_le_log, ← lt_pow_iff_log_lt, and_comm] <;>
assumption
have hm : m ≠ 0 := h.resolve_right hbn
rw [not_and_or, not_lt, Ne, not_not] at hbn
rcases hbn with (hb | rfl)
· obtain rfl | rfl := le_one_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_one.1 hb
any_goals
simp only [ne_eq, zero_eq, reduceSucc, lt_self_iff_false, not_lt_zero, false_and, or_false]
at h
simp [h, eq_comm (a := 0), Nat.zero_pow (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 _)] <;> omega
· simp [@eq_comm _ 0, hm]
#align nat.log_eq_iff Nat.log_eq_iff
theorem log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow {b m n : ℕ} (h₁ : b ^ m ≤ n) (h₂ : n < b ^ (m + 1)) :
log b n = m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm)
· rw [Nat.pow_one] at h₂
exact log_of_lt h₂
· exact (log_eq_iff (Or.inl hm)).2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow Nat.log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow
theorem log_pow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (x : ℕ) : log b (b ^ x) = x :=
log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow le_rfl (Nat.pow_lt_pow_right hb x.lt_succ_self)
#align nat.log_pow Nat.log_pow
theorem log_eq_one_iff' {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ b ≤ n ∧ n < b * b := by
rw [log_eq_iff (Or.inl Nat.one_ne_zero), Nat.pow_add, Nat.pow_one]
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff' Nat.log_eq_one_iff'
theorem log_eq_one_iff {b n : ℕ} : log b n = 1 ↔ n < b * b ∧ 1 < b ∧ b ≤ n :=
log_eq_one_iff'.trans
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, lt_mul_self_iff.1 (h.1.trans_lt h.2), h.1⟩, fun h => ⟨h.2.2, h.1⟩⟩
#align nat.log_eq_one_iff Nat.log_eq_one_iff
theorem log_mul_base {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : log b (n * b) = log b n + 1 := by
apply log_eq_of_pow_le_of_lt_pow <;> rw [pow_succ', Nat.mul_comm b]
exacts [Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (pow_log_le_self _ hn),
(Nat.mul_lt_mul_right (Nat.zero_lt_one.trans hb)).2 (lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _)]
#align nat.log_mul_base Nat.log_mul_base
theorem pow_log_le_add_one (b : ℕ) : ∀ x, b ^ log b x ≤ x + 1
| 0 => by rw [log_zero_right, Nat.pow_zero]
| x + 1 => (pow_log_le_self b x.succ_ne_zero).trans (x + 1).le_succ
#align nat.pow_log_le_add_one Nat.pow_log_le_add_one
theorem log_monotone {b : ℕ} : Monotone (log b) := by
refine monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n => ?_
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb]
exact zero_le _
· exact le_log_of_pow_le hb (pow_log_le_add_one _ _)
#align nat.log_monotone Nat.log_monotone
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : log b n ≤ log b m :=
log_monotone h
#align nat.log_mono_right Nat.log_mono_right
@[mono]
theorem log_anti_left {b c n : ℕ} (hc : 1 < c) (hb : c ≤ b) : log b n ≤ log c n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · rw [log_zero_right, log_zero_right]
apply le_log_of_pow_le hc
calc
c ^ log b n ≤ b ^ log b n := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hb _
_ ≤ n := pow_log_le_self _ hn
#align nat.log_anti_left Nat.log_anti_left
theorem log_antitone_left {n : ℕ} : AntitoneOn (fun b => log b n) (Set.Ioi 1) := fun _ hc _ _ hb =>
log_anti_left (Set.mem_Iio.1 hc) hb
#align nat.log_antitone_left Nat.log_antitone_left
@[simp]
theorem log_div_base (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b) = log b n - 1 := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb, Nat.zero_sub]
cases' lt_or_le n b with h h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, log_of_lt h, log_zero_right]
rw [log_of_one_lt_of_le hb h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align nat.log_div_base Nat.log_div_base
@[simp]
theorem log_div_mul_self (b n : ℕ) : log b (n / b * b) = log b n := by
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rw [log_of_left_le_one hb, log_of_left_le_one hb]
cases' lt_or_le n b with h h
· rw [div_eq_of_lt h, Nat.zero_mul, log_zero_right, log_of_lt h]
rw [log_mul_base hb (Nat.div_pos h (by omega)).ne', log_div_base,
Nat.sub_add_cancel (succ_le_iff.2 <| log_pos hb h)]
#align nat.log_div_mul_self Nat.log_div_mul_self
theorem add_pred_div_lt {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : (n + b - 1) / b < n := by
rw [div_lt_iff_lt_mul (by omega), ← succ_le_iff, ← pred_eq_sub_one,
succ_pred_eq_of_pos (by omega)]
exact Nat.add_le_mul hn hb
-- Porting note: Was private in mathlib 3
-- #align nat.add_pred_div_lt Nat.add_pred_div_lt
--@[pp_nodot]
def clog (b : ℕ) : ℕ → ℕ
| n => if h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n then clog b ((n + b - 1) / b) + 1 else 0
decreasing_by
-- putting this in the def triggers the `unusedHavesSuffices` linter:
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries/issues/428
have : (n + b - 1) / b < n := add_pred_div_lt h.1 h.2
decreasing_trivial
#align nat.clog Nat.clog
theorem clog_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : clog b n = 0 := by
rw [clog, dif_neg fun h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n => h.1.not_le hb]
#align nat.clog_of_left_le_one Nat.clog_of_left_le_one
theorem clog_of_right_le_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ 1) (b : ℕ) : clog b n = 0 := by
rw [clog, dif_neg fun h : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n => h.2.not_le hn]
#align nat.clog_of_right_le_one Nat.clog_of_right_le_one
@[simp] lemma clog_zero_left (n : ℕ) : clog 0 n = 0 := clog_of_left_le_one (Nat.zero_le _) _
#align nat.clog_zero_left Nat.clog_zero_left
@[simp] lemma clog_zero_right (b : ℕ) : clog b 0 = 0 := clog_of_right_le_one (Nat.zero_le _) _
#align nat.clog_zero_right Nat.clog_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_left (n : ℕ) : clog 1 n = 0 :=
clog_of_left_le_one le_rfl _
#align nat.clog_one_left Nat.clog_one_left
@[simp]
theorem clog_one_right (b : ℕ) : clog b 1 = 0 :=
clog_of_right_le_one le_rfl _
#align nat.clog_one_right Nat.clog_one_right
theorem clog_of_two_le {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) :
clog b n = clog b ((n + b - 1) / b) + 1 := by rw [clog, dif_pos (⟨hb, hn⟩ : 1 < b ∧ 1 < n)]
#align nat.clog_of_two_le Nat.clog_of_two_le
theorem clog_pos {b n : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hn : 2 ≤ n) : 0 < clog b n := by
rw [clog_of_two_le hb hn]
exact zero_lt_succ _
#align nat.clog_pos Nat.clog_pos
theorem clog_eq_one {b n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) (h : n ≤ b) : clog b n = 1 := by
rw [clog_of_two_le (hn.trans h) hn, clog_of_right_le_one]
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul] <;> omega
#align nat.clog_eq_one Nat.clog_eq_one
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Log.lean | 290 | 304 | theorem le_pow_iff_clog_le {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x y : ℕ} : x ≤ b ^ y ↔ clog b x ≤ y := by |
induction' x using Nat.strong_induction_on with x ih generalizing y
cases y
· rw [Nat.pow_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => (clog_of_right_le_one h b).le, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← not_lt]
contrapose!
exact clog_pos hb
have b_pos : 0 < b := zero_lt_of_lt hb
rw [clog]; split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, ← ih ((x + b - 1) / b) (add_pred_div_lt hb h.2),
Nat.div_le_iff_le_mul_add_pred b_pos, Nat.mul_comm b, ← Nat.pow_succ,
Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.succ_le_of_lt b_pos), Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
· exact iff_of_true ((not_lt.1 (not_and.1 h hb)).trans <| succ_le_of_lt <| Nat.pow_pos b_pos)
(zero_le _)
|
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
#align_import data.qpf.multivariate.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
universe u
open MvFunctor
class MvQPF {n : ℕ} (F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type*) [MvFunctor F] where
P : MvPFunctor.{u} n
abs : ∀ {α}, P α → F α
repr : ∀ {α}, F α → P α
abs_repr : ∀ {α} (x : F α), abs (repr x) = x
abs_map : ∀ {α β} (f : α ⟹ β) (p : P α), abs (f <$$> p) = f <$$> abs p
#align mvqpf MvQPF
namespace MvQPF
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} n → Type*} [MvFunctor F] [q : MvQPF F]
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
protected theorem id_map {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) : TypeVec.id <$$> x = x := by
rw [← abs_repr x]
cases' repr x with a f
rw [← abs_map]
rfl
#align mvqpf.id_map MvQPF.id_map
@[simp]
theorem comp_map {α β γ : TypeVec n} (f : α ⟹ β) (g : β ⟹ γ) (x : F α) :
(g ⊚ f) <$$> x = g <$$> f <$$> x := by
rw [← abs_repr x]
cases' repr x with a f
rw [← abs_map, ← abs_map, ← abs_map]
rfl
#align mvqpf.comp_map MvQPF.comp_map
instance (priority := 100) lawfulMvFunctor : LawfulMvFunctor F where
id_map := @MvQPF.id_map n F _ _
comp_map := @comp_map n F _ _
#align mvqpf.is_lawful_mvfunctor MvQPF.lawfulMvFunctor
-- Lifting predicates and relations
theorem liftP_iff {α : TypeVec n} (p : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → Prop) (x : F α) :
LiftP p x ↔ ∃ a f, x = abs ⟨a, f⟩ ∧ ∀ i j, p (f i j) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
cases' h : repr y with a f
use a, fun i j => (f i j).val
constructor
· rw [← hy, ← abs_repr y, h, ← abs_map]; rfl
intro i j
apply (f i j).property
rintro ⟨a, f, h₀, h₁⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i j => ⟨f i j, h₁ i j⟩⟩
rw [← abs_map, h₀]; rfl
#align mvqpf.liftp_iff MvQPF.liftP_iff
theorem liftR_iff {α : TypeVec n} (r : ∀ {i}, α i → α i → Prop) (x y : F α) :
LiftR r x y ↔ ∃ a f₀ f₁, x = abs ⟨a, f₀⟩ ∧ y = abs ⟨a, f₁⟩ ∧ ∀ i j, r (f₀ i j) (f₁ i j) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨u, xeq, yeq⟩
cases' h : repr u with a f
use a, fun i j => (f i j).val.fst, fun i j => (f i j).val.snd
constructor
· rw [← xeq, ← abs_repr u, h, ← abs_map]; rfl
constructor
· rw [← yeq, ← abs_repr u, h, ← abs_map]; rfl
intro i j
exact (f i j).property
rintro ⟨a, f₀, f₁, xeq, yeq, h⟩
use abs ⟨a, fun i j => ⟨(f₀ i j, f₁ i j), h i j⟩⟩
dsimp; constructor
· rw [xeq, ← abs_map]; rfl
rw [yeq, ← abs_map]; rfl
#align mvqpf.liftr_iff MvQPF.liftR_iff
open Set
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
theorem mem_supp {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) (i) (u : α i) :
u ∈ supp x i ↔ ∀ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x → u ∈ f i '' univ := by
rw [supp]; dsimp; constructor
· intro h a f haf
have : LiftP (fun i u => u ∈ f i '' univ) x := by
rw [liftP_iff]
refine ⟨a, f, haf.symm, ?_⟩
intro i u
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)
exact h this
intro h p; rw [liftP_iff]
rintro ⟨a, f, xeq, h'⟩
rcases h a f xeq.symm with ⟨i, _, hi⟩
rw [← hi]; apply h'
#align mvqpf.mem_supp MvQPF.mem_supp
theorem supp_eq {α : TypeVec n} {i} (x : F α) :
supp x i = { u | ∀ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x → u ∈ f i '' univ } := by ext; apply mem_supp
#align mvqpf.supp_eq MvQPF.supp_eq
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Basic.lean | 184 | 207 | theorem has_good_supp_iff {α : TypeVec n} (x : F α) :
(∀ p, LiftP p x ↔ ∀ (i), ∀ u ∈ supp x i, p i u) ↔
∃ a f, abs ⟨a, f⟩ = x ∧ ∀ i a' f', abs ⟨a', f'⟩ = x → f i '' univ ⊆ f' i '' univ := by |
constructor
· intro h
have : LiftP (supp x) x := by rw [h]; introv; exact id
rw [liftP_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨a, f, xeq, h'⟩
refine ⟨a, f, xeq.symm, ?_⟩
intro a' f' h''
rintro hu u ⟨j, _h₂, hfi⟩
have hh : u ∈ supp x a' := by rw [← hfi]; apply h'
exact (mem_supp x _ u).mp hh _ _ hu
rintro ⟨a, f, xeq, h⟩ p; rw [liftP_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a', f', xeq', h'⟩ i u usuppx
rcases (mem_supp x _ u).mp (@usuppx) a' f' xeq'.symm with ⟨i, _, f'ieq⟩
rw [← f'ieq]
apply h'
intro h'
refine ⟨a, f, xeq.symm, ?_⟩; intro j y
apply h'; rw [mem_supp]
intro a' f' xeq'
apply h _ a' f' xeq'
apply mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.PiLex
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.fin.tuple.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ef997baa41b5c428be3fb50089a7139bf4ee886b"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
#align fin.tuple0_le Fin.tuple0_le
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
#align fin.tail Fin.tail
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
#align fin.tail_def Fin.tail_def
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
#align fin.cons Fin.cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [tail, cons]
#align fin.tail_cons Fin.tail_cons
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 78 | 78 | theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by | simp [cons]
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.IsSplittingField
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Algebra
#align_import field_theory.splitting_field.construction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3f4be1fcb5376c4948d7f095bec45350bfb9d1a"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Field F]
open Polynomial
section SplittingField
def factor (f : K[X]) : K[X] :=
if H : ∃ g, Irreducible g ∧ g ∣ f then Classical.choose H else X
#align polynomial.factor Polynomial.factor
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/SplittingField/Construction.lean | 55 | 59 | theorem irreducible_factor (f : K[X]) : Irreducible (factor f) := by |
rw [factor]
split_ifs with H
· exact (Classical.choose_spec H).1
· exact irreducible_X
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.reverse_singleton List.reverse_singleton
#align list.reverse_append List.reverse_append
#align list.reverse_concat List.reverse_concat
#align list.reverse_reverse List.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
#align list.reverse_involutive List.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
#align list.reverse_injective List.reverse_injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
#align list.reverse_surjective List.reverse_surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
#align list.reverse_bijective List.reverse_bijective
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : List α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_inj List.reverse_inj
theorem reverse_eq_iff {l l' : List α} : l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_iff List.reverse_eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_nil List.reverse_eq_nil_iff
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
#align list.concat_eq_reverse_cons List.concat_eq_reverse_cons
#align list.length_reverse List.length_reverse
-- Porting note: This one was @[simp] in mathlib 3,
-- but Lean contains a competing simp lemma reverse_map.
-- For now we remove @[simp] to avoid simplification loops.
-- TODO: Change Lean lemma to match mathlib 3?
theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
(reverse_map f l).symm
#align list.map_reverse List.map_reverse
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
#align list.map_reverse_core List.map_reverseAux
#align list.mem_reverse List.mem_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2
⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
#align list.reverse_replicate List.reverse_replicate
-- Porting note: this does not work as desired
-- attribute [simp] List.isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_iff_eq_nil {l : List α} : l.isEmpty ↔ l = [] := by cases l <;> simp [isEmpty]
#align list.empty_iff_eq_nil List.isEmpty_iff_eq_nil
#align list.length_init List.length_dropLast
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
∀ h : l ≠ nil, getLast (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil a l) = getLast l h := by
induction l <;> intros
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.last_cons List.getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l _ (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp only [getLast_append]
#align list.last_append_singleton List.getLast_append_singleton
-- Porting note: name should be fixed upstream
theorem getLast_append' (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l₁ l₂ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· simp
· simp only [cons_append]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
exact ih
#align list.last_append List.getLast_append'
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (concat_ne_nil a l) = a :=
getLast_concat ..
#align list.last_concat List.getLast_concat'
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
#align list.last_singleton List.getLast_singleton'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
#align list.last_cons_cons List.getLast_cons_cons
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], h => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
#align list.init_append_last List.dropLast_append_getLast
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
#align list.last_congr List.getLast_congr
#align list.last_mem List.getLast_mem
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ (length_replicate _ _)) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
#align list.last_replicate_succ List.getLast_replicate_succ
-- Porting note: Moved earlier in file, for use in subsequent lemmas.
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_cons_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
getLast? (a :: b :: l) = getLast? (b :: l) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isNone : ∀ {l : List α}, (getLast? l).isNone ↔ l = []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isNone (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_none List.getLast?_isNone
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isSome : ∀ {l : List α}, l.getLast?.isSome ↔ l ≠ []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isSome (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_some List.getLast?_isSome
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
#align list.mem_last'_eq_last List.mem_getLast?_eq_getLast
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
#align list.last'_eq_last_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
#align list.mem_last'_cons List.mem_getLast?_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_getLast? {l : List α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.getLast?) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := mem_getLast?_eq_getLast ha
h₂.symm ▸ getLast_mem _
#align list.mem_of_mem_last' List.mem_of_mem_getLast?
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
#align list.init_append_last' List.dropLast_append_getLast?
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [a] => rfl
| [a, b] => rfl
| [a, b, c] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
#align list.ilast_eq_last' List.getLastI_eq_getLast?
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], a, l₂ => rfl
| [b], a, l₂ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
#align list.last'_append_cons List.getLast?_append_cons
#align list.last'_cons_cons List.getLast?_cons_cons
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
#align list.last'_append_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem getLast?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
#align list.last'_append List.getLast?_append
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head_eq_head' List.head!_eq_head?
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_head List.surjective_head!
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
#align list.surjective_head' List.surjective_head?
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_tail List.surjective_tail
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
#align list.eq_cons_of_mem_head' List.eq_cons_of_mem_head?
theorem mem_of_mem_head? {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l.head?) : x ∈ l :=
(eq_cons_of_mem_head? h).symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
#align list.mem_of_mem_head' List.mem_of_mem_head?
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
#align list.head_cons List.head!_cons
#align list.tail_nil List.tail_nil
#align list.tail_cons List.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.head_append List.head!_append
theorem head?_append {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) : x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
#align list.head'_append List.head?_append
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
#align list.head'_append_of_ne_nil List.head?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
#align list.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
#align list.cons_head'_tail List.cons_head?_tail
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| a :: l, _ => rfl
#align list.head_mem_head' List.head!_mem_head?
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
#align list.cons_head_tail List.cons_head!_tail
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head! l.tail
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
#align list.head_mem_self List.head!_mem_self
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 851 | 852 | theorem head_mem {l : List α} : ∀ (h : l ≠ nil), l.head h ∈ l := by |
cases l <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import number_theory.zsqrtd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
re : ℤ
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
#align zsqrtd Zsqrtd
#align zsqrtd.ext Zsqrtd.ext_iff
prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
#align zsqrtd.of_int Zsqrtd.ofInt
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.of_int_re Zsqrtd.ofInt_re
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.of_int_im Zsqrtd.ofInt_im
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.zero_re Zsqrtd.zero_re
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.zero_im Zsqrtd.zero_im
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.one_re Zsqrtd.one_re
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.one_im Zsqrtd.one_im
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd Zsqrtd.sqrtd
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd_re Zsqrtd.sqrtd_re
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.sqrtd_im Zsqrtd.sqrtd_im
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_def Zsqrtd.add_def
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_re Zsqrtd.add_re
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.add_im Zsqrtd.add_im
#noalign zsqrtd.bit0_re
#noalign zsqrtd.bit0_im
#noalign zsqrtd.bit1_re
#noalign zsqrtd.bit1_im
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.neg_re Zsqrtd.neg_re
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.neg_im Zsqrtd.neg_im
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.mul_re Zsqrtd.mul_re
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.mul_im Zsqrtd.mul_im
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
add_left_neg := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_mk Zsqrtd.star_mk
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_re Zsqrtd.star_re
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.star_im Zsqrtd.star_im
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive x := Zsqrtd.ext _ _ rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add a b := Zsqrtd.ext _ _ rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, (Zsqrtd.ext_iff 0 1).not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_re Zsqrtd.natCast_re
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_im Zsqrtd.natCast_im
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_nat_val Zsqrtd.natCast_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_re Zsqrtd.intCast_re
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_im Zsqrtd.intCast_im
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align zsqrtd.coe_int_val Zsqrtd.intCast_val
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 293 | 293 | theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by | ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.OpenImmersion
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe v v₁ v₂ u u₁
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v} C]
section
variable (X : Scheme.{u})
notation3:90 f:91 "⁻¹ᵁ " U:90 => (Opens.map (f : LocallyRingedSpace.Hom _ _).val.base).obj U
notation3:60 X:60 " ∣_ᵤ " U:61 => Scheme.restrict X (U : Opens X).openEmbedding
abbrev Scheme.ιOpens {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : Opens X.carrier) : X ∣_ᵤ U ⟶ X := X.ofRestrict _
lemma Scheme.ofRestrict_val_c_app_self {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : Opens X) :
(X.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding).1.c.app (op U) = X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by simp)).op := rfl
lemma Scheme.eq_restrict_presheaf_map_eqToHom {X : Scheme.{u}} (U : Opens X) {V W : Opens U}
(e : U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V = U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj W) :
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom e).op =
(X ∣_ᵤ U).presheaf.map (eqToHom <| U.openEmbedding.functor_obj_injective e).op := rfl
instance ΓRestrictAlgebra {X : Scheme.{u}} {Y : TopCat.{u}} {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : OpenEmbedding f) :
Algebra (Scheme.Γ.obj (op X)) (Scheme.Γ.obj (op <| X.restrict hf)) :=
(Scheme.Γ.map (X.ofRestrict hf).op).toAlgebra
#align algebraic_geometry.Γ_restrict_algebra AlgebraicGeometry.ΓRestrictAlgebra
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen' (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X) (r : Scheme.Γ.obj (op <| X ∣_ᵤ U)) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X ∣_ᵤ U).basicOpen r) = X.basicOpen
(X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op r) := by
refine (Scheme.image_basicOpen (X.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding) r).trans ?_
erw [← Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq _ _ (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top).op]
rw [← comp_apply, ← CategoryTheory.Functor.map_comp, ← op_comp, eqToHom_trans, eqToHom_refl,
op_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id]
congr
exact PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.ofRestrict_invApp _ _ _
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X) (r : Scheme.Γ.obj (op <| X ∣_ᵤ U)) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X ∣_ᵤ U).basicOpen r) = X.basicOpen r := by
rw [Scheme.map_basicOpen', Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq]
lemma Scheme.map_basicOpen_map (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X) (r : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X ∣_ᵤ U).basicOpen <|
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.openEmbedding_obj_top).op r) = X.basicOpen r := by
rw [Scheme.map_basicOpen', Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq, Scheme.basicOpen_res_eq]
-- Porting note: `simps` can't synthesize `obj_left, obj_hom, mapLeft`
-- @[simps obj_left obj_hom mapLeft]
def Scheme.restrictFunctor : Opens X ⥤ Over X where
obj U := Over.mk (ιOpens U)
map {U V} i :=
Over.homMk
(IsOpenImmersion.lift (ιOpens V) (ιOpens U) <| by
dsimp [restrict, ofRestrict, LocallyRingedSpace.ofRestrict, Opens.coe_inclusion]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
exact i.le)
(IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac _ _ _)
map_id U := by
ext1
dsimp only [Over.homMk_left, Over.id_left]
rw [← cancel_mono (ιOpens U), Category.id_comp,
IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac]
map_comp {U V W} i j := by
ext1
dsimp only [Over.homMk_left, Over.comp_left]
rw [← cancel_mono (ιOpens W), Category.assoc]
iterate 3 rw [IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor
@[simp] lemma Scheme.restrictFunctor_obj_left (U : Opens X) :
(X.restrictFunctor.obj U).left = X ∣_ᵤ U := rfl
@[simp] lemma Scheme.restrictFunctor_obj_hom (U : Opens X) :
(X.restrictFunctor.obj U).hom = Scheme.ιOpens U := rfl
@[simp] lemma Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_left {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).left = IsOpenImmersion.lift (ιOpens V) (ιOpens U) (by
dsimp [ofRestrict, LocallyRingedSpace.ofRestrict, Opens.inclusion]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]; rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
exact i.le) := rfl
-- Porting note: the `by ...` used to be automatically done by unification magic
@[reassoc]
theorem Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).1 ≫ ιOpens V = ιOpens U :=
IsOpenImmersion.lift_fac _ _ (by
dsimp [restrict, ofRestrict, LocallyRingedSpace.ofRestrict]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
exact i.le)
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor_map_ofRestrict AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict
theorem Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_base {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).1.1.base = (Opens.toTopCat _).map i := by
ext a; refine Subtype.ext ?_ -- Porting note: `ext` did not pick up `Subtype.ext`
exact (congr_arg (fun f : X.restrict U.openEmbedding ⟶ X => f.1.base a)
(X.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict i))
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor_map_base AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_base
theorem Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_app_aux {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) (W : Opens V) :
U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((X.restrictFunctor.map i).1 ⁻¹ᵁ W) ≤
V.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj W := by
simp only [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, IsOpenMap.functor_obj_coe, Set.image_subset_iff,
Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_base, Opens.map_coe, Opens.inclusion_apply]
rintro _ h
exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor_map_app_aux AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_app_aux
theorem Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_app {U V : Opens X} (i : U ⟶ V) (W : Opens V) :
(X.restrictFunctor.map i).1.1.c.app (op W) =
X.presheaf.map (homOfLE <| X.restrictFunctor_map_app_aux i W).op := by
have e₁ :=
Scheme.congr_app (X.restrictFunctor_map_ofRestrict i)
(op <| V.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj W)
rw [Scheme.comp_val_c_app] at e₁
-- Porting note: `Opens.map_functor_eq` need more help
have e₂ := (X.restrictFunctor.map i).1.val.c.naturality (eqToHom <| W.map_functor_eq (U := V)).op
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp] at e₂
dsimp [restrict] at e₁ e₂ ⊢
rw [e₂, W.adjunction_counit_map_functor (U := V), ← IsIso.eq_inv_comp, IsIso.inv_comp_eq,
← IsIso.eq_comp_inv] at e₁
simp_rw [eqToHom_map (Opens.map _), eqToHom_map (IsOpenMap.functor _), ← Functor.map_inv,
← Functor.map_comp] at e₁
rw [e₁]
congr 1
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor_map_app AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_app
@[simps!]
def Scheme.restrictFunctorΓ : X.restrictFunctor.op ⋙ (Over.forget X).op ⋙ Scheme.Γ ≅ X.presheaf :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun U => X.presheaf.mapIso ((eqToIso (unop U).openEmbedding_obj_top).symm.op : _))
(by
intro U V i
dsimp [-Scheme.restrictFunctor_map_left]
rw [X.restrictFunctor_map_app, ← Functor.map_comp, ← Functor.map_comp]
congr 1)
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_functor_Γ AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictFunctorΓ
noncomputable
def Scheme.restrictRestrictComm (X : Scheme.{u}) (U V : Opens X.carrier) :
X ∣_ᵤ U ∣_ᵤ ιOpens U ⁻¹ᵁ V ≅ X ∣_ᵤ V ∣_ᵤ ιOpens V ⁻¹ᵁ U := by
refine IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (ιOpens _ ≫ ιOpens U) (ιOpens _ ≫ ιOpens V) ?_
simp only [Scheme.restrict_carrier, Scheme.ofRestrict_val_base, Scheme.comp_coeBase,
TopCat.coe_comp, Opens.coe_inclusion, Set.range_comp, Opens.map]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
dsimp
rw [Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val, Set.inter_comm]
noncomputable
def Scheme.restrictRestrict (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X.carrier) (V : Opens (X ∣_ᵤ U).carrier) :
X ∣_ᵤ U ∣_ᵤ V ≅ X ∣_ᵤ U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V := by
refine IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (ιOpens _ ≫ ιOpens U) (ιOpens _) ?_
simp only [Scheme.restrict_carrier, Scheme.ofRestrict_val_base, Scheme.comp_coeBase,
TopCat.coe_comp, Opens.coe_inclusion, Set.range_comp, Opens.map]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_val]
rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Scheme.restrictRestrict_hom_restrict (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X.carrier)
(V : Opens (X ∣_ᵤ U).carrier) :
(X.restrictRestrict U V).hom ≫ ιOpens _ = ιOpens V ≫ ιOpens U :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_hom_fac _ _ _
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma Scheme.restrictRestrict_inv_restrict_restrict (X : Scheme.{u}) (U : Opens X.carrier)
(V : Opens (X ∣_ᵤ U).carrier) :
(X.restrictRestrict U V).inv ≫ ιOpens V ≫ ιOpens U = ιOpens _ :=
IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq_inv_fac _ _ _
noncomputable
def Scheme.restrictIsoOfEq (X : Scheme.{u}) {U V : Opens X.carrier} (e : U = V) :
X ∣_ᵤ U ≅ X ∣_ᵤ V := by
exact IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (ιOpens U) (ιOpens V) (by rw [e])
end
noncomputable abbrev Scheme.restrictMapIso {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f]
(U : Opens Y) : X ∣_ᵤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U ≅ Y ∣_ᵤ U := by
apply IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq (f := X.ofRestrict _ ≫ f)
(H := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp (hf := inferInstance) (hg := inferInstance))
(Y.ofRestrict _) _
dsimp [restrict]
rw [Set.range_comp, Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_coe]
refine @Set.image_preimage_eq _ _ f.1.base U.1 ?_
rw [← TopCat.epi_iff_surjective]
infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.restrict_map_iso AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.restrictMapIso
section MorphismRestrict
def pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
pullback f (Scheme.ιOpens U) ≅ X ∣_ᵤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U := by
refine IsOpenImmersion.isoOfRangeEq pullback.fst (X.ofRestrict _) ?_
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_fst_of_right]
dsimp [Opens.coe_inclusion, Scheme.restrict]
rw [Subtype.range_val, Subtype.range_coe]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.pullback_restrict_iso_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
(pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict f U).inv ≫ pullback.fst = X.ofRestrict _ := by
delta pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict; simp
#align algebraic_geometry.pullback_restrict_iso_restrict_inv_fst AlgebraicGeometry.pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_hom_restrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
(pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict f U).hom ≫ Scheme.ιOpens (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) = pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict; simp
#align algebraic_geometry.pullback_restrict_iso_restrict_hom_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_hom_restrict
def morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) : X ∣_ᵤ f ⁻¹ᵁ U ⟶ Y ∣_ᵤ U :=
(pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict f U).inv ≫ pullback.snd
#align algebraic_geometry.morphism_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.morphismRestrict
infixl:85 " ∣_ " => morphismRestrict
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_hom_morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(U : Opens Y) : (pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict f U).hom ≫ f ∣_ U = pullback.snd :=
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc _ _
#align algebraic_geometry.pullback_restrict_iso_restrict_hom_morphism_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_hom_morphismRestrict
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem morphismRestrict_ι {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
(f ∣_ U) ≫ Scheme.ιOpens U = Scheme.ιOpens (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) ≫ f := by
delta morphismRestrict
rw [Category.assoc, pullback.condition.symm, pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.morphism_restrict_ι AlgebraicGeometry.morphismRestrict_ι
theorem isPullback_morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
IsPullback (f ∣_ U) (Scheme.ιOpens (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)) (Scheme.ιOpens U) f := by
delta morphismRestrict
rw [← Category.id_comp f]
refine
(IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨?_⟩).paste_horiz
(IsPullback.of_hasPullback f (Y.ofRestrict U.openEmbedding)).flip
-- Porting note: changed `rw` to `erw`
erw [pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst]; rw [Category.comp_id]
#align algebraic_geometry.is_pullback_morphism_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.isPullback_morphismRestrict
theorem morphismRestrict_comp {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (U : Opens Z) :
(f ≫ g) ∣_ U = f ∣_ g ⁻¹ᵁ U ≫ g ∣_ U := by
delta morphismRestrict
rw [← pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_snd]
simp_rw [← Category.assoc]
congr 1
rw [← cancel_mono pullback.fst]
simp_rw [Category.assoc]
rw [pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst, pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst, ←
pullback.condition, pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst_assoc,
pullbackRestrictIsoRestrict_inv_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.morphism_restrict_comp AlgebraicGeometry.morphismRestrict_comp
instance {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (U : Opens Y) : IsIso (f ∣_ U) := by
delta morphismRestrict; infer_instance
theorem morphismRestrict_base_coe {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) (x) :
@Coe.coe U Y (⟨fun x => x.1⟩) ((f ∣_ U).1.base x) = f.1.base x.1 :=
congr_arg (fun f => PresheafedSpace.Hom.base (LocallyRingedSpace.Hom.val f) x)
(morphismRestrict_ι f U)
#align algebraic_geometry.morphism_restrict_base_coe AlgebraicGeometry.morphismRestrict_base_coe
theorem morphismRestrict_val_base {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
⇑(f ∣_ U).1.base = U.1.restrictPreimage f.1.base :=
funext fun x => Subtype.ext (morphismRestrict_base_coe f U x)
#align algebraic_geometry.morphism_restrict_val_base AlgebraicGeometry.morphismRestrict_val_base
theorem image_morphismRestrict_preimage {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) (V : Opens U) :
(f ⁻¹ᵁ U).openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj ((f ∣_ U) ⁻¹ᵁ V) =
f ⁻¹ᵁ (U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V) := by
ext1
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hx' : (f ∣_ U).1.base _ ∈ V, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨_, hx⟩, ?_, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this rewrite was not necessary
rw [SetLike.mem_coe]
convert hx'
-- Porting note: `ext1` is not compiling
refine Subtype.ext ?_
exact (morphismRestrict_base_coe f U ⟨x, hx⟩).symm
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hx' : _ ∈ V.1, rfl : x = _⟩
refine ⟨⟨_, hx⟩, (?_ : (f ∣_ U).1.base ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈ V.1), rfl⟩
convert hx'
-- Porting note: `ext1` is compiling
refine Subtype.ext ?_
exact morphismRestrict_base_coe f U ⟨x, hx⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.image_morphism_restrict_preimage AlgebraicGeometry.image_morphismRestrict_preimage
theorem morphismRestrict_c_app {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) (V : Opens U) :
(f ∣_ U).1.c.app (op V) =
f.1.c.app (op (U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V)) ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (image_morphismRestrict_preimage f U V)).op := by
have :=
Scheme.congr_app (morphismRestrict_ι f U) (op (U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V))
rw [Scheme.comp_val_c_app, Scheme.comp_val_c_app_assoc] at this
have e : (Opens.map U.inclusion).obj (U.openEmbedding.isOpenMap.functor.obj V) = V := by
ext1; exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.coe_injective
have : _ ≫ X.presheaf.map _ = _ :=
(((f ∣_ U).1.c.naturality (eqToHom e).op).symm.trans ?_).trans this
· rw [← IsIso.eq_comp_inv, ← Functor.map_inv, Category.assoc] at this
rw [this]
congr 1
erw [← X.presheaf.map_comp, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
· change Y.presheaf.map _ ≫ _ = Y.presheaf.map _ ≫ _
congr 1
#align algebraic_geometry.morphism_restrict_c_app AlgebraicGeometry.morphismRestrict_c_app
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Restrict.lean | 359 | 365 | theorem Γ_map_morphismRestrict {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) :
Scheme.Γ.map (f ∣_ U).op =
Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom <| U.openEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op ≫
f.1.c.app (op U) ≫ X.presheaf.map (eqToHom <| (f ⁻¹ᵁ U).openEmbedding_obj_top).op := by |
rw [Scheme.Γ_map_op, morphismRestrict_c_app f U ⊤, f.val.c.naturality_assoc]
erw [← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fec1d95fc61c750c1ddbb5b1f7f48b8e811a80d7"
noncomputable section
universe v u u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
inductive WalkingPair : Type
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair
open WalkingPair
def WalkingPair.swap : WalkingPair ≃ WalkingPair where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
invFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_left : WalkingPair.swap left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_right : WalkingPair.swap right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt : WalkingPair.swap.symm left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff : WalkingPair.swap.symm right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff
def WalkingPair.equivBool : WalkingPair ≃ Bool where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j true false
-- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
invFun b := Bool.recOn b right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv b := by cases b; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left : WalkingPair.equivBool left = true :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right : WalkingPair.equivBool right = false :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm true = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm false = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false
variable {C : Type u}
def pairFunction (X Y : C) : WalkingPair → C := fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_left (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_left
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_right (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y right = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_right
variable [Category.{v} C]
def pair (X Y : C) : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C :=
Discrete.functor fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair CategoryTheory.Limits.pair
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨left⟩ = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_left
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨right⟩ = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_right
section
variable {F G : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨left⟩)
(g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨right⟩)
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
def mapPair : F ⟶ G where
app j := Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
naturality := fun ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_left : (mapPair f g).app ⟨left⟩ = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_left CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_left
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_right : (mapPair f g).app ⟨right⟩ = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_right CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_right
@[simps!]
def mapPairIso (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨left⟩) (g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨right⟩) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g)
(fun ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPairIso
end
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoPair (F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) :=
mapPairIso (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoPair
section
variable {D : Type u} [Category.{v} D]
def pairComp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagramIsoPair _
#align category_theory.limits.pair_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pairComp
end
abbrev BinaryFan (X Y : C) :=
Cone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan
abbrev BinaryFan.fst {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.fst
abbrev BinaryFan.snd {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.fst :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.snd :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_right
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y)
(lift : ∀ {T : C} (_ : T ⟶ X) (_ : T ⟶ Y), T ⟶ s.pt)
(hl₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.fst = f)
(hl₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.snd = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (m : T ⟶ s.pt) (_ : m ≫ s.fst = f) (_ : m ≫ s.snd = g),
m = lift f g) :
IsLimit s :=
Limits.IsLimit.mk (fun t => lift (BinaryFan.fst t) (BinaryFan.snd t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hl₁ _ _
· exact hl₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk
theorem BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) {f g : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext
abbrev BinaryCofan (X Y : C) := Cocone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan
abbrev BinaryCofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inl
abbrev BinaryCofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inr
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_right
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y)
(desc : ∀ {T : C} (_ : X ⟶ T) (_ : Y ⟶ T), s.pt ⟶ T)
(hd₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inl ≫ desc f g = f)
(hd₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inr ≫ desc f g = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (m : s.pt ⟶ T) (_ : s.inl ≫ m = f) (_ : s.inr ≫ m = g),
m = desc f g) :
IsColimit s :=
Limits.IsColimit.mk (fun t => desc (BinaryCofan.inl t) (BinaryCofan.inr t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hd₁ _ _
· exact hd₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk
theorem BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s)
{f g : s.pt ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext
variable {X Y : C}
section
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
@[simps pt]
def BinaryFan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : BinaryFan X Y where
pt := P
π :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk
@[simps pt]
def BinaryCofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : BinaryCofan X Y where
pt := P
ι :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_fst {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).fst = π₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_snd {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).snd = π₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inl {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inl = ι₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inr {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inr = ι₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inr
def isoBinaryFanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryFan.mk c.fst c.snd :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_fan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryFanMk
def isoBinaryCofanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryCofan.mk c.inl c.inr :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_cofan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryCofanMk
def BinaryFan.isLimitMk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (lift : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryFan X Y) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk fst snd) :=
{ lift := lift
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitMk
def BinaryCofan.isColimitMk {W : C} {inl : X ⟶ W} {inr : Y ⟶ W}
(desc : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryCofan X Y) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk inl inr) :=
{ desc := desc
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
@[simps]
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g } :=
⟨h.lift <| BinaryFan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift'
@[simps]
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨h.desc <| BinaryCofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc'
def BinaryFan.isLimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryFan X Y} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => hc.lift (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitFlip
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal Y) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.fst := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' H (𝟙 X) (h.from X)
exact
⟨⟨l,
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext H (by simpa [hl, -Category.comp_id] using Category.comp_id _)
(h.hom_ext _ _),
hl⟩⟩
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f _ => f ≫ inv c.fst) (fun _ _ => by simp)
(fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ => by simp [← e]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal X) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.snd := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst h (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some).ofIsoLimit (isoBinaryFanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : X ⟶ X')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (c.fst ≫ f) c.snd) := by
fapply BinaryFan.isLimitMk
· exact fun s => h.lift (BinaryFan.mk (s.fst ≫ inv f) s.snd)
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [Category.comp_id,BinaryFan.π_app_left,IsIso.inv_hom_id,
BinaryFan.mk_fst,IsLimit.fac_assoc,eq_self_iff_true,Category.assoc]
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,eq_self_iff_true,IsLimit.fac]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: simpa timed out here also
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext h
· simpa only
[BinaryFan.π_app_left,BinaryFan.mk_fst,Category.assoc,IsLimit.fac,IsIso.eq_comp_inv]
· simpa only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,IsLimit.fac]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : Y ⟶ Y')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.fst (c.snd ≫ f)) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitFlip <| BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso
def BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial Y) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inl := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' H (𝟙 X) (h.to X)
refine ⟨⟨l, hl, BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext H (?_) (h.hom_ext _ _)⟩⟩
rw [Category.comp_id]
have e : (inl c ≫ l) ≫ inl c = 𝟙 X ≫ inl c := congrArg (·≫inl c) hl
rwa [Category.assoc,Category.id_comp] at e
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f _ => inv c.inl ≫ f)
(fun _ _ => IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc _ _) (fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ =>
(IsIso.eq_inv_comp _).mpr e⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial X) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inr := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl h (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some).ofIsoColimit (isoBinaryCofanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : X' ⟶ X)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (f ≫ c.inl) c.inr) := by
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s => h.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (inv f ≫ s.inl) s.inr)
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
apply BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext h
· rw [← cancel_epi f]
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc] using e₁
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
· simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : Y' ⟶ Y)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inl (f ≫ c.inr)) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip <| BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso
abbrev HasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) :=
HasLimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_product CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryProduct
abbrev HasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) :=
HasColimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryCoproduct
abbrev prod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :=
limit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prod
abbrev coprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :=
colimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod
notation:20 X " ⨯ " Y:20 => prod X Y
notation:20 X " ⨿ " Y:20 => coprod X Y
abbrev prod.fst {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.fst
abbrev prod.snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.snd
abbrev coprod.inl {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl
abbrev coprod.inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr
def prodIsProd (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) prod.snd) :=
(limit.isLimit _).ofIsoLimit (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
))
#align category_theory.limits.prod_is_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prodIsProd
def coprodIsCoprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) coprod.inr) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).ofIsoColimit (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
))
#align category_theory.limits.coprod_is_coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprodIsCoprod
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] {f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y}
(h₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext (limit.isLimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.prod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.hom_ext
@[ext 1100]
theorem coprod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] {f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W}
(h₁ : coprod.inl ≫ f = coprod.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : coprod.inr ≫ f = coprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (colimit.isColimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.hom_ext
abbrev prod.lift {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y :=
limit.lift _ (BinaryFan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift
abbrev diag (X : C) [HasBinaryProduct X X] : X ⟶ X ⨯ X :=
prod.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.diag CategoryTheory.Limits.diag
abbrev coprod.desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (BinaryCofan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc
abbrev codiag (X : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] : X ⨿ X ⟶ X :=
coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.codiag
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.fst = f :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.snd = g :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc f g = f :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc f g = g :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono f] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono g] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_snd _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi f] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inl_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi g] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inr_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right
def prod.lift' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
{ l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y // l ≫ prod.fst = f ∧ l ≫ prod.snd = g } :=
⟨prod.lift f g, prod.lift_fst _ _, prod.lift_snd _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift'
def coprod.desc' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
{ l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W // coprod.inl ≫ l = f ∧ coprod.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨coprod.desc f g, coprod.inl_desc _ _, coprod.inr_desc _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc'
def prod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z :=
limMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map
def coprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z :=
colimMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map
section ProdLemmas
-- Making the reassoc version of this a simp lemma seems to be more harmful than helpful.
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem prod.comp_lift {V W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : W ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ prod.lift g h = prod.lift (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.comp_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_lift
#align category_theory.limits.prod.comp_lift_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_lift_assoc
theorem prod.comp_diag {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct Y Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ diag Y = prod.lift f f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.comp_diag CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_diag
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_fst {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst ≫ f :=
limMap_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_fst_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_fst_assoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_snd {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.snd = prod.snd ≫ g :=
limMap_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_snd_assoc
@[simp]
theorem prod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : prod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_id_id
@[simp]
theorem prod.lift_fst_snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
prod.lift prod.fst prod.snd = 𝟙 (X ⨯ Y) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.lift_map {V W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : V ⟶ W)
(g : V ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) (k : X ⟶ Z) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.lift (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_map
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_map_assoc
@[simp]
theorem prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W Y] [HasBinaryProduct X Z]
(g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) : prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ g) (prod.snd ≫ g') = prod.map g g' := by
rw [← prod.lift_map]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `map_fst` and `map_snd` can still work just
-- as well.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C} [HasBinaryProduct A₁ B₁] [HasBinaryProduct A₂ B₂]
[HasBinaryProduct A₃ B₃] (f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
prod.map f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_map
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_map_assoc
-- TODO: is it necessary to weaken the assumption here?
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/BinaryProducts.lean | 765 | 767 | theorem prod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] :
prod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 B) = prod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ prod.map (𝟙 Y) f := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import probability.kernel.integral_comp_prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0d694db494dd4f9aa57f2714b6e4c82b4ebc113"
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal MeasureTheory Filter ProbabilityTheory ProbabilityTheory.kernel
variable {α β γ E : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
{mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {κ : kernel α β} [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
{η : kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η] {a : α}
namespace ProbabilityTheory
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left (a : α) {s : Set (β × γ)} (h2s : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun b => (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal) (κ a) := by
let t := toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg]
calc
∫⁻ b, ENNReal.ofReal (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal ∂κ a
_ ≤ ∫⁻ b, η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' t) ∂κ a := by
refine lintegral_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [ae_kernel_lt_top a h2s] with b hb
rw [ofReal_toReal hb.ne]
exact measure_mono (preimage_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _))
_ ≤ (κ ⊗ₖ η) a t := le_compProd_apply _ _ _ _
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s := measure_toMeasurable s
_ < ⊤ := h2s.lt_top
#align probability_theory.has_finite_integral_prod_mk_left ProbabilityTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left
theorem integrable_kernel_prod_mk_left (a : α) {s : Set (β × γ)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun b => (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal) (κ a) := by
constructor
· exact (measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left' hs a).ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left a h2s
#align probability_theory.integrable_kernel_prod_mk_left ProbabilityTheory.integrable_kernel_prod_mk_left
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd [NormedSpace ℝ E]
⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) :=
⟨fun x => ∫ y, hf.mk f (x, y) ∂η (a, x), hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.integral_kernel_prod_right'', by
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd hf.ae_eq_mk] with _ hx using integral_congr_ae hx⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.integral_kernel_comp_prod MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.compProd_mk_left {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f : β × γ → δ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x)) := by
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx using
⟨fun y => hf.mk f (x, y), hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left, hx⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.comp_prod_mk_left MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.compProd_mk_left
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (h1f : StronglyMeasurable f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, HasFiniteIntegral (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x))) ∧
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral]
rw [kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ h1f.ennnorm]
have : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ y ∂η (a, x), 0 ≤ ‖f (x, y)‖ := fun x => eventually_of_forall fun y => norm_nonneg _
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (this _)
(h1f.norm.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left).aestronglyMeasurable,
ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
have : ∀ {p q r : Prop} (_ : r → p), (r ↔ p ∧ q) ↔ p → (r ↔ q) := fun {p q r} h1 => by
rw [← and_congr_right_iff, and_iff_right_of_imp h1]
rw [this]
· intro h2f; rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
filter_upwards [h2f] with x hx
rw [ofReal_toReal]; rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]; exact hx
· intro h2f; refine ae_lt_top ?_ h2f.ne; exact h1f.ennnorm.lintegral_kernel_prod_right''
#align probability_theory.has_finite_integral_comp_prod_iff ProbabilityTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff' ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄
(h1f : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, HasFiniteIntegral (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x))) ∧
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) := by
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_congr h1f.ae_eq_mk,
hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff h1f.stronglyMeasurable_mk]
apply and_congr
· apply eventually_congr
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd h1f.ae_eq_mk.symm] with x hx using
hasFiniteIntegral_congr hx
· apply hasFiniteIntegral_congr
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd h1f.ae_eq_mk.symm] with _ hx using
integral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hx _)
#align probability_theory.has_finite_integral_comp_prod_iff' ProbabilityTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff'
theorem integrable_compProd_iff ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, Integrable (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x))) ∧
Integrable (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) := by
simp only [Integrable, hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff' hf, hf.norm.integral_kernel_compProd,
hf, hf.compProd_mk_left, eventually_and, true_and_iff]
#align probability_theory.integrable_comp_prod_iff ProbabilityTheory.integrable_compProd_iff
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.compProd_mk_left_ae ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) : ∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, Integrable (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x)) :=
((integrable_compProd_iff hf.aestronglyMeasurable).mp hf).1
#align measure_theory.integrable.comp_prod_mk_left_ae MeasureTheory.Integrable.compProd_mk_left_ae
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_norm_compProd ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) : Integrable (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) :=
((integrable_compProd_iff hf.aestronglyMeasurable).mp hf).2
#align measure_theory.integrable.integral_norm_comp_prod MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_norm_compProd
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_compProd [NormedSpace ℝ E]
⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
Integrable (fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) :=
Integrable.mono hf.integral_norm_compProd hf.aestronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd <|
eventually_of_forall fun x =>
(norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans_eq <|
(norm_of_nonneg <|
integral_nonneg_of_ae <|
eventually_of_forall fun y => (norm_nonneg (f (x, y)) : _)).symm
#align measure_theory.integrable.integral_comp_prod MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_compProd
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[CompleteSpace E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
theorem kernel.integral_fn_integral_add ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (F : E → E')
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) (hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) + g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a =
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) + ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.compProd_mk_left_ae, hg.compProd_mk_left_ae] with _ h2f h2g
simp [integral_add h2f h2g]
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_fn_integral_add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_fn_integral_add
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/IntegralCompProd.lean | 167 | 173 | theorem kernel.integral_fn_integral_sub ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (F : E → E')
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) (hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) - g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a =
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) - ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a := by |
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.compProd_mk_left_ae, hg.compProd_mk_left_ae] with _ h2f h2g
simp [integral_sub h2f h2g]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 462 | 462 | theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by | rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.IsPrimary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.Order.Minimal
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.minimal_prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
section
variable {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (I J : Ideal R)
protected def Ideal.minimalPrimes : Set (Ideal R) :=
minimals (· ≤ ·) { p | p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p }
#align ideal.minimal_primes Ideal.minimalPrimes
variable (R) in
def minimalPrimes : Set (Ideal R) :=
Ideal.minimalPrimes ⊥
#align minimal_primes minimalPrimes
lemma minimalPrimes_eq_minimals : minimalPrimes R = minimals (· ≤ ·) (setOf Ideal.IsPrime) :=
congr_arg (minimals (· ≤ ·)) (by simp)
variable {I J}
theorem Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le [J.IsPrime] (e : I ≤ J) : ∃ p ∈ I.minimalPrimes, p ≤ J := by
suffices
∃ m ∈ { p : (Ideal R)ᵒᵈ | Ideal.IsPrime p ∧ I ≤ OrderDual.ofDual p },
OrderDual.toDual J ≤ m ∧ ∀ z ∈ { p : (Ideal R)ᵒᵈ | Ideal.IsPrime p ∧ I ≤ p }, m ≤ z → z = m by
obtain ⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := this
simp_rw [← @eq_comm _ p] at h₃
exact ⟨p, ⟨h₁, fun a b c => le_of_eq (h₃ a b c)⟩, h₂⟩
apply zorn_nonempty_partialOrder₀
swap
· refine ⟨show J.IsPrime by infer_instance, e⟩
rintro (c : Set (Ideal R)) hc hc' J' hJ'
refine
⟨OrderDual.toDual (sInf c),
⟨Ideal.sInf_isPrime_of_isChain ⟨J', hJ'⟩ hc'.symm fun x hx => (hc hx).1, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [OrderDual.ofDual_toDual, le_sInf_iff]
exact fun _ hx => (hc hx).2
· rintro z hz
rw [OrderDual.le_toDual]
exact sInf_le hz
#align ideal.exists_minimal_primes_le Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.radical_minimalPrimes : I.radical.minimalPrimes = I.minimalPrimes := by
rw [Ideal.minimalPrimes, Ideal.minimalPrimes]
ext p
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, b⟩
· refine ⟨⟨a, a.radical_le_iff.1 ha⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_imp] at *
exact fun _ h2 h3 h4 => b h2 (h2.radical_le_iff.2 h3) h4
· refine ⟨⟨a, a.radical_le_iff.2 ha⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_imp] at *
exact fun _ h2 h3 h4 => b h2 (h2.radical_le_iff.1 h3) h4
#align ideal.radical_minimal_primes Ideal.radical_minimalPrimes
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.sInf_minimalPrimes : sInf I.minimalPrimes = I.radical := by
rw [I.radical_eq_sInf]
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
rw [Ideal.mem_sInf] at hx ⊢
rintro J ⟨e, hJ⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le e
exact hp' (hx hp)
· apply sInf_le_sInf _
intro I hI
exact hI.1.symm
#align ideal.Inf_minimal_primes Ideal.sInf_minimalPrimes
theorem Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes_of_injective {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (p) (H : p ∈ minimalPrimes R) :
∃ p' : Ideal S, p'.IsPrime ∧ p'.comap f = p := by
have := H.1.1
have : Nontrivial (Localization (Submonoid.map f p.primeCompl)) := by
refine ⟨⟨1, 0, ?_⟩⟩
convert (IsLocalization.map_injective_of_injective p.primeCompl (Localization.AtPrime p)
(Localization <| p.primeCompl.map f) hf).ne one_ne_zero
· rw [map_one]
· rw [map_zero]
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal (Localization (Submonoid.map f p.primeCompl))
refine ⟨M.comap (algebraMap S <| Localization (Submonoid.map f p.primeCompl)), inferInstance, ?_⟩
rw [Ideal.comap_comap, ← @IsLocalization.map_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Localization.isLocalization
_ _ _ _ p.primeCompl.le_comap_map _ Localization.isLocalization,
← Ideal.comap_comap]
suffices _ ≤ p by exact this.antisymm (H.2 ⟨inferInstance, bot_le⟩ this)
intro x hx
by_contra h
apply hM.ne_top
apply M.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem hx
apply IsUnit.map
apply IsLocalization.map_units _ (show p.primeCompl from ⟨x, h⟩)
#align ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimal_primes_of_injective Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes_of_injective
end
section
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {I J : Ideal R}
theorem Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes {I : Ideal S} (f : R →+* S) (p)
(H : p ∈ (I.comap f).minimalPrimes) : ∃ p' : Ideal S, p'.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p' ∧ p'.comap f = p := by
have := H.1.1
let f' := (Ideal.Quotient.mk I).comp f
have e : RingHom.ker f' = I.comap f := by
ext1
exact Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero _
have : RingHom.ker (Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f') ≤ p := by
rw [Ideal.mk_ker, e]
exact H.1.2
suffices _ by
have ⟨p', hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes_of_injective
(RingHom.kerLift_injective f') (p.map <| Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f') this
refine ⟨p'.comap <| Ideal.Quotient.mk I, Ideal.IsPrime.comap _, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact Ideal.mk_ker.symm.trans_le (Ideal.comap_mono bot_le)
· convert congr_arg (Ideal.comap <| Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f') hp₂
rwa [Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f')
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, eq_comm, sup_eq_left]
refine ⟨⟨?_, bot_le⟩, ?_⟩
· apply Ideal.map_isPrime_of_surjective _ this
exact Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
· rintro q ⟨hq, -⟩ hq'
rw [← Ideal.map_comap_of_surjective
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (RingHom.ker ((Ideal.Quotient.mk I).comp f)))
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective q]
apply Ideal.map_mono
apply H.2
· refine ⟨inferInstance, (Ideal.mk_ker.trans e).symm.trans_le (Ideal.comap_mono bot_le)⟩
· refine (Ideal.comap_mono hq').trans ?_
rw [Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective]
exacts [sup_le rfl.le this, Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective]
#align ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimal_primes Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes
theorem Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_comap_eq {I : Ideal S} (f : R →+* S) (p)
(H : p ∈ (I.comap f).minimalPrimes) : ∃ p' ∈ I.minimalPrimes, Ideal.comap f p' = p := by
obtain ⟨p', h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes f p H
obtain ⟨q, hq, hq'⟩ := Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le h₂
refine ⟨q, hq, Eq.symm ?_⟩
have := hq.1.1
have := (Ideal.comap_mono hq').trans_eq h₃
exact (H.2 ⟨inferInstance, Ideal.comap_mono hq.1.2⟩ this).antisymm this
#align ideal.exists_minimal_primes_comap_eq Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_comap_eq
theorem Ideal.minimal_primes_comap_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
{I J : Ideal S} (h : J ∈ I.minimalPrimes) : J.comap f ∈ (I.comap f).minimalPrimes := by
have := h.1.1
refine ⟨⟨inferInstance, Ideal.comap_mono h.1.2⟩, ?_⟩
rintro K ⟨hK, e₁⟩ e₂
have : RingHom.ker f ≤ K := (Ideal.comap_mono bot_le).trans e₁
rw [← sup_eq_left.mpr this, RingHom.ker_eq_comap_bot, ← Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective f hf]
apply Ideal.comap_mono _
apply h.2 _ _
· exact ⟨Ideal.map_isPrime_of_surjective hf this, Ideal.le_map_of_comap_le_of_surjective f hf e₁⟩
· exact Ideal.map_le_of_le_comap e₂
#align ideal.mimimal_primes_comap_of_surjective Ideal.minimal_primes_comap_of_surjective
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/MinimalPrime.lean | 190 | 198 | theorem Ideal.comap_minimalPrimes_eq_of_surjective {f : R →+* S} (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(I : Ideal S) : (I.comap f).minimalPrimes = Ideal.comap f '' I.minimalPrimes := by |
ext J
constructor
· intro H
obtain ⟨p, h, rfl⟩ := Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_comap_eq f J H
exact ⟨p, h, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨J, hJ, rfl⟩
exact Ideal.minimal_primes_comap_of_surjective hf hJ
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.order.rearrangement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3f25363ae62cb169e72cd6b8b1ac97bacf21ca7"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section SMul
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
classical
revert hσ σ hfg
-- Porting note: Specify `p` to get around `∀ {σ}` in the current goal.
apply Finset.induction_on_max_value (fun i ↦ toLex (g i, f i))
(p := fun t ↦ ∀ {σ : Perm ι}, MonovaryOn f g t → { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ t →
(∑ i ∈ t, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i • g i) s
· simp only [le_rfl, Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
intro a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ
set τ : Perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
intro x hx
simp only [τ, Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.swap_comp_apply] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h₁ h₂
· obtain rfl | hax := eq_or_ne x a
· contradiction
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hax <| h.symm.trans h₁) hax
· exact (hx <| σ.injective h₂.symm).elim
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ hx) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h₂)
specialize hind (hfg.subset <| subset_insert _ _) hτs
simp_rw [sum_insert has]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left hind _)
obtain hσa | hσa := eq_or_ne a (σ a)
· rw [hτ, ← hσa, swap_self, trans_refl]
have h1s : σ⁻¹ a ∈ s := by
rw [Ne, ← inv_eq_iff_eq] at hσa
refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hσa ?_) hσa
rwa [apply_inv_self, eq_comm] at h
simp only [← s.sum_erase_add _ h1s, add_comm]
rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
simp only [hτ, swap_apply_left, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, apply_inv_self]
refine add_le_add (smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' ?_ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_).le
· specialize hamax (σ⁻¹ a) h1s
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hfg (mem_insert_of_mem h1s) (mem_insert_self _ _) hamax
· exact hamax.2
· specialize hamax (σ a) (mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ <| σ.injective.ne hσa.symm) hσa.symm)
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hamax.le
· exact hamax.1.le
· rw [mem_erase, Ne, eq_inv_iff_eq] at hx
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx.1 (σ.injective.ne _)]
rintro rfl
exact has hx.2
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
classical
refine ⟨not_imp_not.1 fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ (hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ).antisymm ?_⟩
· rw [MonovaryOn] at h
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hgxy, hfxy⟩ := h
set τ : Perm ι := (Equiv.swap x y).trans σ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
refine (set_support_mul_subset σ <| swap x y).trans (Set.union_subset hσ fun z hz ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ := swap_apply_ne_self_iff.1 hz <;> assumption
refine ((hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hτs).trans_lt' ?_).ne
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· cases lt_irrefl _ hfxy
simp only [τ, ← s.sum_erase_add _ hx,
← (s.erase x).sum_erase_add _ (mem_erase.2 ⟨hxy.symm, hy⟩),
add_assoc, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, swap_apply_right, swap_apply_left]
refine add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun z hz ↦ ?_).le
(smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul hfxy hgxy)
simp_rw [mem_erase] at hz
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hz.2.1 hz.1]
· convert h.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul ((set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ) using 1
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, apply_inv_self]
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ ¬MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ]
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
convert hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
(show { x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x } ⊆ s by simp only [set_support_inv_eq, hσ]) using 1
exact σ.sum_comp' s (fun i j ↦ f i • g j) hσ
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by
have hσinv : { x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := (set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ
refine (Iff.trans ?_ <| hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσinv).trans
⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· apply eq_iff_eq_cancel_right.2
rw [σ.sum_comp' s (fun i j ↦ f i • g j) hσ]
congr
· convert h.comp_right σ
· rw [comp.assoc, inv_def, symm_comp_self, comp_id]
· rw [σ.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq, Set.image_perm hσ]
· convert h.comp_right σ.symm
· rw [comp.assoc, self_comp_symm, comp_id]
· rw [σ.symm.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq]
exact Set.image_perm hσinv
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ ¬MonovaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ]
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i) :=
hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ AntivaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s :=
(hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ).trans monovaryOn_toDual_right
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ↔ ¬AntivaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm,
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm hσ]
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i :=
hfg.dual_right.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ AntivaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s :=
(hfg.dual_right.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ).trans monovaryOn_toDual_right
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) < ∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) ↔ ¬AntivaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff hσ, eq_comm, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul hσ]
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
variable [Fintype ι]
theorem Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : Monovary f g) :
(∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i, f i • g i :=
(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _
#align monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Rearrangement.lean | 254 | 256 | theorem Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : Monovary f g) :
((∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ Monovary f (g ∘ σ) := by |
simp [(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Kleene
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Join
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
#align_import computability.language from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a239cd3e7ac2c7cde36c913808f9d40c411344f6"
open List Set Computability
universe v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
def Language (α) :=
Set (List α)
#align language Language
instance : Membership (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.Mem⟩
instance : Singleton (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.singleton⟩
instance : Insert (List α) (Language α) := ⟨Set.insert⟩
instance : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Language α) := Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra
namespace Language
variable {l m : Language α} {a b x : List α}
-- Porting note: `reducible` attribute cannot be local.
-- attribute [local reducible] Language
instance : Zero (Language α) :=
⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
instance : One (Language α) :=
⟨{[]}⟩
instance : Inhabited (Language α) := ⟨(∅ : Set _)⟩
instance : Add (Language α) :=
⟨((· ∪ ·) : Set (List α) → Set (List α) → Set (List α))⟩
instance : Mul (Language α) :=
⟨image2 (· ++ ·)⟩
theorem zero_def : (0 : Language α) = (∅ : Set _) :=
rfl
#align language.zero_def Language.zero_def
theorem one_def : (1 : Language α) = ({[]} : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
#align language.one_def Language.one_def
theorem add_def (l m : Language α) : l + m = (l ∪ m : Set (List α)) :=
rfl
#align language.add_def Language.add_def
theorem mul_def (l m : Language α) : l * m = image2 (· ++ ·) l m :=
rfl
#align language.mul_def Language.mul_def
instance : KStar (Language α) := ⟨fun l ↦ {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l}⟩
lemma kstar_def (l : Language α) : l∗ = {x | ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l} :=
rfl
#align language.kstar_def Language.kstar_def
-- Porting note: `reducible` attribute cannot be local,
-- so this new theorem is required in place of `Set.ext`.
@[ext]
theorem ext {l m : Language α} (h : ∀ (x : List α), x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ m) : l = m :=
Set.ext h
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (x : List α) : x ∉ (0 : Language α) :=
id
#align language.not_mem_zero Language.not_mem_zero
@[simp]
theorem mem_one (x : List α) : x ∈ (1 : Language α) ↔ x = [] := by rfl
#align language.mem_one Language.mem_one
theorem nil_mem_one : [] ∈ (1 : Language α) :=
Set.mem_singleton _
#align language.nil_mem_one Language.nil_mem_one
theorem mem_add (l m : Language α) (x : List α) : x ∈ l + m ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ m :=
Iff.rfl
#align language.mem_add Language.mem_add
theorem mem_mul : x ∈ l * m ↔ ∃ a ∈ l, ∃ b ∈ m, a ++ b = x :=
mem_image2
#align language.mem_mul Language.mem_mul
theorem append_mem_mul : a ∈ l → b ∈ m → a ++ b ∈ l * m :=
mem_image2_of_mem
#align language.append_mem_mul Language.append_mem_mul
theorem mem_kstar : x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ L : List (List α), x = L.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align language.mem_kstar Language.mem_kstar
theorem join_mem_kstar {L : List (List α)} (h : ∀ y ∈ L, y ∈ l) : L.join ∈ l∗ :=
⟨L, rfl, h⟩
#align language.join_mem_kstar Language.join_mem_kstar
theorem nil_mem_kstar (l : Language α) : [] ∈ l∗ :=
⟨[], rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
#align language.nil_mem_kstar Language.nil_mem_kstar
instance instSemiring : Semiring (Language α) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := union_assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := empty_union
add_zero := union_empty
add_comm := union_comm
mul := (· * ·)
mul_assoc _ _ _ := image2_assoc append_assoc
zero_mul _ := image2_empty_left
mul_zero _ := image2_empty_right
one := 1
one_mul l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
mul_one l := by simp [mul_def, one_def]
natCast n := if n = 0 then 0 else 1
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ n := by cases n <;> simp [Nat.cast, add_def, zero_def]
left_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_right
right_distrib _ _ _ := image2_union_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem add_self (l : Language α) : l + l = l :=
sup_idem _
#align language.add_self Language.add_self
def map (f : α → β) : Language α →+* Language β where
toFun := image (List.map f)
map_zero' := image_empty _
map_one' := image_singleton
map_add' := image_union _
map_mul' _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| map_append _
#align language.map Language.map
@[simp]
theorem map_id (l : Language α) : map id l = l := by simp [map]
#align language.map_id Language.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (l : Language α) : map g (map f l) = map (g ∘ f) l := by
simp [map, image_image]
#align language.map_map Language.map_map
lemma mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty {x : List α} :
x ∈ l∗ ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, rfl, h⟩
refine ⟨S.filter fun l ↦ !List.isEmpty l, by simp, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
-- Porting note: The previous code was:
-- rw [mem_filter, empty_iff_eq_nil] at hy
rw [mem_filter, Bool.not_eq_true', ← Bool.bool_iff_false, isEmpty_iff_eq_nil] at hy
exact ⟨h y hy.1, hy.2⟩
· rintro ⟨S, hx, h⟩
exact ⟨S, hx, fun y hy ↦ (h y hy).1⟩
theorem kstar_def_nonempty (l : Language α) :
l∗ = { x | ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.join ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l ∧ y ≠ [] } := by
ext x; apply mem_kstar_iff_exists_nonempty
#align language.kstar_def_nonempty Language.kstar_def_nonempty
theorem le_iff (l m : Language α) : l ≤ m ↔ l + m = m :=
sup_eq_right.symm
#align language.le_iff Language.le_iff
theorem le_mul_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : Language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ * l₂ ≤ m₁ * m₂ := by
intro h₁ h₂ x hx
simp only [mul_def, exists_and_left, mem_image2, image_prod] at hx ⊢
tauto
#align language.le_mul_congr Language.le_mul_congr
theorem le_add_congr {l₁ l₂ m₁ m₂ : Language α} : l₁ ≤ m₁ → l₂ ≤ m₂ → l₁ + l₂ ≤ m₁ + m₂ :=
sup_le_sup
#align language.le_add_congr Language.le_add_congr
theorem mem_iSup {ι : Sort v} {l : ι → Language α} {x : List α} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, l i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ l i :=
mem_iUnion
#align language.mem_supr Language.mem_iSup
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) * m = ⨆ i, l i * m :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
#align language.supr_mul Language.iSup_mul
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort v} (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(m * ⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m * l i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
#align language.mul_supr Language.mul_iSup
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort v} [Nonempty ι] (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(⨆ i, l i) + m = ⨆ i, l i + m :=
iSup_sup
#align language.supr_add Language.iSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort v} [Nonempty ι] (l : ι → Language α) (m : Language α) :
(m + ⨆ i, l i) = ⨆ i, m + l i :=
sup_iSup
#align language.add_supr Language.add_iSup
| Mathlib/Computability/Language.lean | 234 | 249 | theorem mem_pow {l : Language α} {x : List α} {n : ℕ} :
x ∈ l ^ n ↔ ∃ S : List (List α), x = S.join ∧ S.length = n ∧ ∀ y ∈ S, y ∈ l := by |
induction' n with n ihn generalizing x
· simp only [mem_one, pow_zero, length_eq_zero]
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨[], rfl, rfl, fun _ h ↦ by contradiction⟩
· rintro ⟨_, rfl, rfl, _⟩
rfl
· simp only [pow_succ', mem_mul, ihn]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, ⟨S, rfl, rfl, hS⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: S, rfl, rfl, forall_mem_cons.2 ⟨ha, hS⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, S⟩, rfl, hn, hS⟩ <;> cases hn
rw [forall_mem_cons] at hS
exact ⟨a, hS.1, _, ⟨S, rfl, rfl, hS.2⟩, rfl⟩
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.quadratic_form.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9b2755b951bc323c962bd072cd447b375cf58101"
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M₁ M₂ N₁ N₂ : Type*} {Mᵢ Nᵢ : ι → Type*}
namespace QuadraticForm
section Prod
section Pi
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Mᵢ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Nᵢ i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (Mᵢ i)] [∀ i, Module R (Nᵢ i)]
def pi [Fintype ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) : QuadraticForm R (∀ i, Mᵢ i) :=
∑ i, (Q i).comp (LinearMap.proj i : _ →ₗ[R] Mᵢ i)
#align quadratic_form.pi QuadraticForm.pi
@[simp]
theorem pi_apply [Fintype ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) (x : ∀ i, Mᵢ i) :
pi Q x = ∑ i, Q i (x i) :=
sum_apply _ _ _
#align quadratic_form.pi_apply QuadraticForm.pi_apply
theorem pi_apply_single [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
(Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) (i : ι) (m : Mᵢ i) :
pi Q (Pi.single i m) = Q i m := by
rw [pi_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i fun j hj => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hj, map_zero]
@[simps toLinearEquiv]
def IsometryEquiv.pi [Fintype ι]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)} {Q' : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Nᵢ i)}
(e : ∀ i, (Q i).IsometryEquiv (Q' i)) : (pi Q).IsometryEquiv (pi Q') where
map_app' x := by
simp only [pi_apply, LinearEquiv.piCongrRight, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe,
IsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, IsometryEquiv.map_app]
toLinearEquiv := LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun i => (e i : Mᵢ i ≃ₗ[R] Nᵢ i)
#align quadratic_form.isometry.pi QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv.pi
@[simps!]
def Isometry.single [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) (i : ι) :
Q i →qᵢ pi Q where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.single i
map_app' := pi_apply_single _ _
@[simps!]
def Isometry.proj [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (Q : QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) :
pi (Pi.single i Q) →qᵢ Q where
toLinearMap := LinearMap.proj i
map_app' m := by
dsimp
rw [pi_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i (fun j hij => ?_), Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hij, zero_apply]
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- ignore the bogus "Left-hand side does not simplify" lint error
theorem Isometry.proj_comp_single_of_same [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
(i : ι) (Q : QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) :
(proj i Q).comp (single _ i) = .ofEq (Pi.single_eq_same _ _) :=
ext fun _ => Pi.single_eq_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem Isometry.proj_comp_single_of_ne [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
{i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (Q : QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) :
(proj i Q).comp (single _ j) = (0 : 0 →qᵢ Q).comp (ofEq (Pi.single_eq_of_ne h.symm _)) :=
ext fun _ => Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
theorem Equivalent.pi [Fintype ι] {Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)}
{Q' : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Nᵢ i)} (e : ∀ i, (Q i).Equivalent (Q' i)) :
(pi Q).Equivalent (pi Q') :=
⟨IsometryEquiv.pi fun i => Classical.choice (e i)⟩
#align quadratic_form.equivalent.pi QuadraticForm.Equivalent.pi
theorem anisotropic_of_pi [Fintype ι] {R} [OrderedCommRing R] [∀ i, Module R (Mᵢ i)]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)} (h : (pi Q).Anisotropic) : ∀ i, (Q i).Anisotropic := by
simp_rw [Anisotropic, pi_apply, Function.funext_iff, Pi.zero_apply] at h
intro i x hx
classical
have := h (Pi.single i x) ?_ i
· rw [Pi.single_eq_same] at this
exact this
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro j _
by_cases hji : j = i
· subst hji; rw [Pi.single_eq_same, hx]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hji, map_zero]
#align quadratic_form.anisotropic_of_pi QuadraticForm.anisotropic_of_pi
theorem nonneg_pi_iff [Fintype ι] {R} [OrderedCommRing R] [∀ i, Module R (Mᵢ i)]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)} : (∀ x, 0 ≤ pi Q x) ↔ ∀ i x, 0 ≤ Q i x := by
simp_rw [pi, sum_apply, comp_apply, LinearMap.proj_apply]
constructor
-- TODO: does this generalize to a useful lemma independent of `QuadraticForm`?
· intro h i x
classical
convert h (Pi.single i x) using 1
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i (Finset.mem_univ _) fun j _ hji => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hji, map_zero]
· rintro h x
exact Finset.sum_nonneg fun i _ => h i (x i)
#align quadratic_form.nonneg_pi_iff QuadraticForm.nonneg_pi_iff
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Prod.lean | 342 | 353 | theorem posDef_pi_iff [Fintype ι] {R} [OrderedCommRing R] [∀ i, Module R (Mᵢ i)]
{Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)} : (pi Q).PosDef ↔ ∀ i, (Q i).PosDef := by |
simp_rw [posDef_iff_nonneg, nonneg_pi_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hle, ha⟩
intro i
exact ⟨hle i, anisotropic_of_pi ha i⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨fun i => (h i).1, fun x hx => funext fun i => (h i).2 _ ?_⟩
rw [pi_apply, Finset.sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg fun j _ => ?_] at hx
· exact hx _ (Finset.mem_univ _)
exact (h j).1 _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
#align_import data.nat.factors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
attribute [instance 0] instBEqNat
def factors : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| 1 => []
| k + 2 =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
m :: factors ((k + 2) / m)
decreasing_by show (k + 2) / m < (k + 2); exact factors_lemma
#align nat.factors Nat.factors
@[simp]
theorem factors_zero : factors 0 = [] := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_zero Nat.factors_zero
@[simp]
theorem factors_one : factors 1 = [] := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_one Nat.factors_one
@[simp]
theorem factors_two : factors 2 = [2] := by simp [factors]
theorem prime_of_mem_factors {n : ℕ} : ∀ {p : ℕ}, (h : p ∈ factors n) → Prime p := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro p h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
have h₁ : p = m ∨ p ∈ factors ((k + 2) / m) :=
List.mem_cons.1 (by rwa [factors] at h)
exact Or.casesOn h₁ (fun h₂ => h₂.symm ▸ minFac_prime (by simp)) prime_of_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factors Nat.prime_of_mem_factors
theorem pos_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ factors n) : 0 < p :=
Prime.pos (prime_of_mem_factors h)
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factors Nat.pos_of_mem_factors
theorem prod_factors : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → List.prod (factors n) = n
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| k + 2 => fun _ =>
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
show (factors (k + 2)).prod = (k + 2) by
have h₁ : (k + 2) / m ≠ 0 := fun h => by
have : (k + 2) = 0 * m := (Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left (minFac_pos _) (minFac_dvd _)).1 h
rw [zero_mul] at this; exact (show k + 2 ≠ 0 by simp) this
rw [factors, List.prod_cons, prod_factors h₁, Nat.mul_div_cancel' (minFac_dvd _)]
#align nat.prod_factors Nat.prod_factors
theorem factors_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) : p.factors = [p] := by
have : p = p - 2 + 2 := (tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hp.two_le).mp rfl
rw [this, Nat.factors]
simp only [Eq.symm this]
have : Nat.minFac p = p := (Nat.prime_def_minFac.mp hp).2
simp only [this, Nat.factors, Nat.div_self (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
#align nat.factors_prime Nat.factors_prime
theorem factors_chain {n : ℕ} :
∀ {a}, (∀ p, Prime p → p ∣ n → a ≤ p) → List.Chain (· ≤ ·) a (factors n) := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| k + 2 =>
intro a h
let m := minFac (k + 2)
have : (k + 2) / m < (k + 2) := factors_lemma
rw [factors]
refine List.Chain.cons ((le_minFac.2 h).resolve_left (by simp)) (factors_chain ?_)
exact fun p pp d => minFac_le_of_dvd pp.two_le (d.trans <| div_dvd_of_dvd <| minFac_dvd _)
#align nat.factors_chain Nat.factors_chain
theorem factors_chain_2 (n) : List.Chain (· ≤ ·) 2 (factors n) :=
factors_chain fun _ pp _ => pp.two_le
#align nat.factors_chain_2 Nat.factors_chain_2
theorem factors_chain' (n) : List.Chain' (· ≤ ·) (factors n) :=
@List.Chain'.tail _ _ (_ :: _) (factors_chain_2 _)
#align nat.factors_chain' Nat.factors_chain'
theorem factors_sorted (n : ℕ) : List.Sorted (· ≤ ·) (factors n) :=
List.chain'_iff_pairwise.1 (factors_chain' _)
#align nat.factors_sorted Nat.factors_sorted
theorem factors_add_two (n : ℕ) :
factors (n + 2) = minFac (n + 2) :: factors ((n + 2) / minFac (n + 2)) := by rw [factors]
#align nat.factors_add_two Nat.factors_add_two
@[simp]
theorem factors_eq_nil (n : ℕ) : n.factors = [] ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
· rw [factors] at h
injection h
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· exact factors_zero
· exact factors_one
#align nat.factors_eq_nil Nat.factors_eq_nil
open scoped List in
theorem eq_of_perm_factors {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (h : a.factors ~ b.factors) :
a = b := by simpa [prod_factors ha, prod_factors hb] using List.Perm.prod_eq h
#align nat.eq_of_perm_factors Nat.eq_of_perm_factors
section
open List
theorem mem_factors_iff_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : Prime p) : p ∈ factors n ↔ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun h => prod_factors hn ▸ List.dvd_prod h, fun h =>
mem_list_primes_of_dvd_prod (prime_iff.mp hp) (fun _ h => prime_iff.mp (prime_of_mem_factors h))
((prod_factors hn).symm ▸ h)⟩
#align nat.mem_factors_iff_dvd Nat.mem_factors_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.factors) : p ∣ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· exact dvd_zero p
· rwa [← mem_factors_iff_dvd hn.ne' (prime_of_mem_factors h)]
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_factors Nat.dvd_of_mem_factors
theorem mem_factors {n p} (hn : n ≠ 0) : p ∈ factors n ↔ Prime p ∧ p ∣ n :=
⟨fun h => ⟨prime_of_mem_factors h, dvd_of_mem_factors h⟩, fun ⟨hprime, hdvd⟩ =>
(mem_factors_iff_dvd hn hprime).mpr hdvd⟩
#align nat.mem_factors Nat.mem_factors
@[simp] lemma mem_factors' {n p} : p ∈ n.factors ↔ p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
cases n <;> simp [mem_factors, *]
theorem le_of_mem_factors {n p : ℕ} (h : p ∈ n.factors) : p ≤ n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· rw [factors_zero] at h
cases h
· exact le_of_dvd hn (dvd_of_mem_factors h)
#align nat.le_of_mem_factors Nat.le_of_mem_factors
theorem factors_unique {n : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (h₁ : prod l = n) (h₂ : ∀ p ∈ l, Prime p) :
l ~ factors n := by
refine perm_of_prod_eq_prod ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [h₁]
refine (prod_factors ?_).symm
rintro rfl
rw [prod_eq_zero_iff] at h₁
exact Prime.ne_zero (h₂ 0 h₁) rfl
· simp_rw [← prime_iff]
exact h₂
· simp_rw [← prime_iff]
exact fun p => prime_of_mem_factors
#align nat.factors_unique Nat.factors_unique
theorem Prime.factors_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) :
(p ^ n).factors = List.replicate n p := by
symm
rw [← List.replicate_perm]
apply Nat.factors_unique (List.prod_replicate n p)
intro q hq
rwa [eq_of_mem_replicate hq]
#align nat.prime.factors_pow Nat.Prime.factors_pow
theorem eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hpos : n ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ {d}, Nat.Prime d → d ∣ n → d = p) : n = p ^ n.factors.length := by
set k := n.factors.length
rw [← prod_factors hpos, ← prod_replicate k p,
eq_replicate_of_mem fun d hd => h (prime_of_mem_factors hd) (dvd_of_mem_factors hd)]
#align nat.eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd Nat.eq_prime_pow_of_unique_prime_dvd
theorem perm_factors_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).factors ~ a.factors ++ b.factors := by
refine (factors_unique ?_ ?_).symm
· rw [List.prod_append, prod_factors ha, prod_factors hb]
· intro p hp
rw [List.mem_append] at hp
cases' hp with hp' hp' <;> exact prime_of_mem_factors hp'
#align nat.perm_factors_mul Nat.perm_factors_mul
theorem perm_factors_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).factors ~ a.factors ++ b.factors := by
rcases a.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | ha)
· simp [(coprime_zero_left _).mp hab]
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· simp [(coprime_zero_right _).mp hab]
exact perm_factors_mul ha.ne' hb.ne'
#align nat.perm_factors_mul_of_coprime Nat.perm_factors_mul_of_coprime
theorem factors_sublist_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≠ 0) : n.factors <+ (n * k).factors := by
cases' n with hn
· simp [zero_mul]
apply sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted _ (factors_sorted _) (factors_sorted _)
simp only [(perm_factors_mul (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) h).subperm_left]
exact (sublist_append_left _ _).subperm
#align nat.factors_sublist_right Nat.factors_sublist_right
theorem factors_sublist_of_dvd {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∣ k) (h' : k ≠ 0) : n.factors <+ k.factors := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := h
exact factors_sublist_right (right_ne_zero_of_mul h')
#align nat.factors_sublist_of_dvd Nat.factors_sublist_of_dvd
theorem factors_subset_right {n k : ℕ} (h : k ≠ 0) : n.factors ⊆ (n * k).factors :=
(factors_sublist_right h).subset
#align nat.factors_subset_right Nat.factors_subset_right
theorem factors_subset_of_dvd {n k : ℕ} (h : n ∣ k) (h' : k ≠ 0) : n.factors ⊆ k.factors :=
(factors_sublist_of_dvd h h').subset
#align nat.factors_subset_of_dvd Nat.factors_subset_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_factors_subperm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a.factors <+~ b.factors) : a ∣ b := by
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· exact dvd_zero _
rcases a with (_ | _ | a)
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· exact one_dvd _
-- Porting note: previous proof
--use (b.factors.diff a.succ.succ.factors).prod
use (@List.diff _ instBEqOfDecidableEq b.factors a.succ.succ.factors).prod
nth_rw 1 [← Nat.prod_factors ha]
rw [← List.prod_append,
List.Perm.prod_eq <| List.subperm_append_diff_self_of_count_le <| List.subperm_ext_iff.mp h,
Nat.prod_factors hb.ne']
#align nat.dvd_of_factors_subperm Nat.dvd_of_factors_subperm
theorem replicate_subperm_factors_iff {a b n : ℕ} (ha : Prime a) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
replicate n a <+~ factors b ↔ a ^ n ∣ b := by
induction n generalizing b with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
constructor
· rw [List.subperm_iff]
rintro ⟨u, hu1, hu2⟩
rw [← Nat.prod_factors hb, ← hu1.prod_eq, ← prod_replicate]
exact hu2.prod_dvd_prod
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [Ne, pow_succ', mul_assoc, mul_eq_zero, _root_.not_or] at hb
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc, replicate_succ, (Nat.perm_factors_mul hb.1 hb.2).subperm_left,
factors_prime ha, singleton_append, subperm_cons, ih hb.2]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
end
theorem mem_factors_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) {p : ℕ} :
p ∈ (a * b).factors ↔ p ∈ a.factors ∨ p ∈ b.factors := by
rw [mem_factors (mul_ne_zero ha hb), mem_factors ha, mem_factors hb, ← and_or_left]
simpa only [and_congr_right_iff] using Prime.dvd_mul
#align nat.mem_factors_mul Nat.mem_factors_mul
theorem coprime_factors_disjoint {a b : ℕ} (hab : a.Coprime b) :
List.Disjoint a.factors b.factors := by
intro q hqa hqb
apply not_prime_one
rw [← eq_one_of_dvd_coprimes hab (dvd_of_mem_factors hqa) (dvd_of_mem_factors hqb)]
exact prime_of_mem_factors hqa
#align nat.coprime_factors_disjoint Nat.coprime_factors_disjoint
theorem mem_factors_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) (p : ℕ) :
p ∈ (a * b).factors ↔ p ∈ a.factors ∪ b.factors := by
rcases a.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | ha)
· simp [(coprime_zero_left _).mp hab]
rcases b.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hb)
· simp [(coprime_zero_right _).mp hab]
rw [mem_factors_mul ha.ne' hb.ne', List.mem_union_iff]
#align nat.mem_factors_mul_of_coprime Nat.mem_factors_mul_of_coprime
open List
theorem mem_factors_mul_left {p a b : ℕ} (hpa : p ∈ a.factors) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
p ∈ (a * b).factors := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp at hpa
apply (mem_factors_mul ha hb).2 (Or.inl hpa)
#align nat.mem_factors_mul_left Nat.mem_factors_mul_left
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factors.lean | 313 | 316 | theorem mem_factors_mul_right {p a b : ℕ} (hpb : p ∈ b.factors) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
p ∈ (a * b).factors := by |
rw [mul_comm]
exact mem_factors_mul_left hpb ha
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
open scoped Topology
variable {X Y A} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace A]
theorem embedding_toPullbackDiag (f : X → Y) : Embedding (toPullbackDiag f) :=
Embedding.mk' _ (injective_toPullbackDiag f) fun x ↦ by
rw [toPullbackDiag, nhds_induced, Filter.comap_comap, nhds_prod_eq, Filter.comap_prod]
erw [Filter.comap_id, inf_idem]
lemma Continuous.mapPullback {X₁ X₂ Y₁ Y₂ Z₁ Z₂}
[TopologicalSpace X₁] [TopologicalSpace X₂] [TopologicalSpace Z₁] [TopologicalSpace Z₂]
{f₁ : X₁ → Y₁} {g₁ : Z₁ → Y₁} {f₂ : X₂ → Y₂} {g₂ : Z₂ → Y₂}
{mapX : X₁ → X₂} (contX : Continuous mapX) {mapY : Y₁ → Y₂}
{mapZ : Z₁ → Z₂} (contZ : Continuous mapZ)
{commX : f₂ ∘ mapX = mapY ∘ f₁} {commZ : g₂ ∘ mapZ = mapY ∘ g₁} :
Continuous (Function.mapPullback mapX mapY mapZ commX commZ) := by
refine continuous_induced_rng.mpr (continuous_prod_mk.mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩) <;>
apply_rules [continuous_fst, continuous_snd, continuous_subtype_val, Continuous.comp]
def IsSeparatedMap (f : X → Y) : Prop := ∀ x₁ x₂, f x₁ = f x₂ →
x₁ ≠ x₂ → ∃ s₁ s₂, IsOpen s₁ ∧ IsOpen s₂ ∧ x₁ ∈ s₁ ∧ x₂ ∈ s₂ ∧ Disjoint s₁ s₂
lemma t2space_iff_isSeparatedMap (y : Y) : T2Space X ↔ IsSeparatedMap fun _ : X ↦ y :=
⟨fun ⟨t2⟩ _ _ _ hne ↦ t2 hne, fun sep ↦ ⟨fun x₁ x₂ hne ↦ sep x₁ x₂ rfl hne⟩⟩
lemma T2Space.isSeparatedMap [T2Space X] (f : X → Y) : IsSeparatedMap f := fun _ _ _ ↦ t2_separation
lemma Function.Injective.isSeparatedMap {f : X → Y} (inj : f.Injective) : IsSeparatedMap f :=
fun _ _ he hne ↦ (hne (inj he)).elim
lemma isSeparatedMap_iff_disjoint_nhds {f : X → Y} : IsSeparatedMap f ↔
∀ x₁ x₂, f x₁ = f x₂ → x₁ ≠ x₂ → Disjoint (𝓝 x₁) (𝓝 x₂) :=
forall₃_congr fun x x' _ ↦ by simp only [(nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff (nhds_basis_opens x'),
exists_prop, ← exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
lemma isSeparatedMap_iff_nhds {f : X → Y} : IsSeparatedMap f ↔
∀ x₁ x₂, f x₁ = f x₂ → x₁ ≠ x₂ → ∃ s₁ ∈ 𝓝 x₁, ∃ s₂ ∈ 𝓝 x₂, Disjoint s₁ s₂ := by
simp_rw [isSeparatedMap_iff_disjoint_nhds, Filter.disjoint_iff]
open Set Filter in
theorem isSeparatedMap_iff_isClosed_diagonal {f : X → Y} :
IsSeparatedMap f ↔ IsClosed f.pullbackDiagonal := by
simp_rw [isSeparatedMap_iff_nhds, ← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds,
Subtype.forall, Prod.forall, nhds_induced, nhds_prod_eq]
refine forall₄_congr fun x₁ x₂ _ _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨t, ht, t_sub⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· simp_rw [← Filter.disjoint_iff, ← compl_diagonal_mem_prod] at h
exact ⟨_, h, subset_rfl⟩
· obtain ⟨s₁, h₁, s₂, h₂, s_sub⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp ht
exact ⟨s₁, h₁, s₂, h₂, disjoint_left.2 fun x h₁ h₂ ↦ @t_sub ⟨(x, x), rfl⟩ (s_sub ⟨h₁, h₂⟩) rfl⟩
theorem isSeparatedMap_iff_closedEmbedding {f : X → Y} :
IsSeparatedMap f ↔ ClosedEmbedding (toPullbackDiag f) := by
rw [isSeparatedMap_iff_isClosed_diagonal, ← range_toPullbackDiag]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨embedding_toPullbackDiag f, h⟩, fun h ↦ h.isClosed_range⟩
theorem isSeparatedMap_iff_isClosedMap {f : X → Y} :
IsSeparatedMap f ↔ IsClosedMap (toPullbackDiag f) :=
isSeparatedMap_iff_closedEmbedding.trans
⟨ClosedEmbedding.isClosedMap, closedEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_closed
(embedding_toPullbackDiag f).continuous (injective_toPullbackDiag f)⟩
open Function.Pullback in
theorem IsSeparatedMap.pullback {f : X → Y} (sep : IsSeparatedMap f) (g : A → Y) :
IsSeparatedMap (@snd X Y A f g) := by
rw [isSeparatedMap_iff_isClosed_diagonal] at sep ⊢
rw [← preimage_map_fst_pullbackDiagonal]
refine sep.preimage (Continuous.mapPullback ?_ ?_) <;>
apply_rules [continuous_fst, continuous_subtype_val, Continuous.comp]
theorem IsSeparatedMap.comp_left {f : X → Y} (sep : IsSeparatedMap f) {g : Y → A}
(inj : g.Injective) : IsSeparatedMap (g ∘ f) := fun x₁ x₂ he ↦ sep x₁ x₂ (inj he)
theorem IsSeparatedMap.comp_right {f : X → Y} (sep : IsSeparatedMap f) {g : A → X}
(cont : Continuous g) (inj : g.Injective) : IsSeparatedMap (f ∘ g) := by
rw [isSeparatedMap_iff_isClosed_diagonal] at sep ⊢
rw [← inj.preimage_pullbackDiagonal]
exact sep.preimage (cont.mapPullback cont)
def IsLocallyInjective (f : X → Y) : Prop := ∀ x : X, ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ U.InjOn f
lemma Function.Injective.IsLocallyInjective {f : X → Y} (inj : f.Injective) :
IsLocallyInjective f := fun _ ↦ ⟨_, isOpen_univ, trivial, fun _ _ _ _ ↦ @inj _ _⟩
lemma isLocallyInjective_iff_nhds {f : X → Y} :
IsLocallyInjective f ↔ ∀ x : X, ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 x, U.InjOn f := by
constructor <;> intro h x
· obtain ⟨U, ho, hm, hi⟩ := h x; exact ⟨U, ho.mem_nhds hm, hi⟩
· obtain ⟨U, hn, hi⟩ := h x
exact ⟨interior U, isOpen_interior, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.mpr hn, hi.mono interior_subset⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/SeparatedMap.lean | 131 | 142 | theorem isLocallyInjective_iff_isOpen_diagonal {f : X → Y} :
IsLocallyInjective f ↔ IsOpen f.pullbackDiagonal := by |
simp_rw [isLocallyInjective_iff_nhds, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds,
Subtype.forall, Prod.forall, nhds_induced, nhds_prod_eq, Filter.mem_comap]
refine ⟨?_, fun h x ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro h x x' hx (rfl : x = x')
obtain ⟨U, hn, hi⟩ := h x
exact ⟨_, Filter.prod_mem_prod hn hn, fun {p} hp ↦ hi hp.1 hp.2 p.2⟩
· obtain ⟨t, ht, t_sub⟩ := h x x rfl rfl
obtain ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, prod_sub⟩ := Filter.mem_prod_iff.mp ht
exact ⟨t₁ ∩ t₂, Filter.inter_mem h₁ h₂,
fun x₁ h₁ x₂ h₂ he ↦ @t_sub ⟨(x₁, x₂), he⟩ (prod_sub ⟨h₁.1, h₂.2⟩)⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pi.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.ConvexBody
-- TODO. Rewrite some of the FLT results on the disciminant using the definitions and results of
-- this file
namespace NumberField
open FiniteDimensional NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace Matrix
open scoped Classical Real nonZeroDivisors
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
noncomputable abbrev discr : ℤ := Algebra.discr ℤ (RingOfIntegers.basis K)
theorem coe_discr : (discr K : ℚ) = Algebra.discr ℚ (integralBasis K) :=
(Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization ℤ _ K (RingOfIntegers.basis K)).symm
theorem discr_ne_zero : discr K ≠ 0 := by
rw [← (Int.cast_injective (α := ℚ)).ne_iff, coe_discr]
exact Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis ℚ (integralBasis K)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Discriminant.lean | 50 | 53 | theorem discr_eq_discr {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
Algebra.discr ℤ b = discr K := by |
let b₀ := Basis.reindex (RingOfIntegers.basis K) (Basis.indexEquiv (RingOfIntegers.basis K) b)
rw [Algebra.discr_eq_discr (𝓞 K) b b₀, Basis.coe_reindex, Algebra.discr_reindex]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
#align_import number_theory.pell_matiyasevic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"795b501869b9fa7aa716d5fdadd00c03f983a605"
namespace Pell
open Nat
section
variable {d : ℤ}
def IsPell : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨x, y⟩ => x * x - d * y * y = 1
#align pell.is_pell Pell.IsPell
theorem isPell_norm : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b * star b = 1
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff, IsPell, mul_comm]; ring_nf
#align pell.is_pell_norm Pell.isPell_norm
theorem isPell_iff_mem_unitary : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ b ∈ unitary (ℤ√d)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by rw [unitary.mem_iff, isPell_norm, mul_comm (star _), and_self_iff]
#align pell.is_pell_iff_mem_unitary Pell.isPell_iff_mem_unitary
theorem isPell_mul {b c : ℤ√d} (hb : IsPell b) (hc : IsPell c) : IsPell (b * c) :=
isPell_norm.2 (by simp [mul_comm, mul_left_comm c, mul_assoc,
star_mul, isPell_norm.1 hb, isPell_norm.1 hc])
#align pell.is_pell_mul Pell.isPell_mul
theorem isPell_star : ∀ {b : ℤ√d}, IsPell b ↔ IsPell (star b)
| ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp [IsPell, Zsqrtd.star_mk]
#align pell.is_pell_star Pell.isPell_star
end
section
-- Porting note: was parameter in Lean3
variable {a : ℕ} (a1 : 1 < a)
private def d (_a1 : 1 < a) :=
a * a - 1
@[simp]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d a1 :=
tsub_pos_of_lt (mul_lt_mul a1 (le_of_lt a1) (by decide) (Nat.zero_le _) : 1 * 1 < a * a)
#align pell.d_pos Pell.d_pos
-- TODO(lint): Fix double namespace issue
--@[nolint dup_namespace]
def pell : ℕ → ℕ × ℕ
-- Porting note: used pattern matching because `Nat.recOn` is noncomputable
| 0 => (1, 0)
| n+1 => ((pell n).1 * a + d a1 * (pell n).2, (pell n).1 + (pell n).2 * a)
#align pell.pell Pell.pell
def xn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).1
#align pell.xn Pell.xn
def yn (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(pell a1 n).2
#align pell.yn Pell.yn
@[simp]
theorem pell_val (n : ℕ) : pell a1 n = (xn a1 n, yn a1 n) :=
show pell a1 n = ((pell a1 n).1, (pell a1 n).2) from
match pell a1 n with
| (_, _) => rfl
#align pell.pell_val Pell.pell_val
@[simp]
theorem xn_zero : xn a1 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pell.xn_zero Pell.xn_zero
@[simp]
theorem yn_zero : yn a1 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align pell.yn_zero Pell.yn_zero
@[simp]
theorem xn_succ (n : ℕ) : xn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n * a + d a1 * yn a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.xn_succ Pell.xn_succ
@[simp]
theorem yn_succ (n : ℕ) : yn a1 (n + 1) = xn a1 n + yn a1 n * a :=
rfl
#align pell.yn_succ Pell.yn_succ
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem xn_one : xn a1 1 = a := by simp
#align pell.xn_one Pell.xn_one
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem yn_one : yn a1 1 = 1 := by simp
#align pell.yn_one Pell.yn_one
def xz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
xn a1 n
#align pell.xz Pell.xz
def yz (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
yn a1 n
#align pell.yz Pell.yz
section
def az (a : ℕ) : ℤ :=
a
#align pell.az Pell.az
end
theorem asq_pos : 0 < a * a :=
le_trans (le_of_lt a1)
(by have := @Nat.mul_le_mul_left 1 a a (le_of_lt a1); rwa [mul_one] at this)
#align pell.asq_pos Pell.asq_pos
theorem dz_val : ↑(d a1) = az a * az a - 1 :=
have : 1 ≤ a * a := asq_pos a1
by rw [Pell.d, Int.ofNat_sub this]; rfl
#align pell.dz_val Pell.dz_val
@[simp]
theorem xz_succ (n : ℕ) : (xz a1 (n + 1)) = xz a1 n * az a + d a1 * yz a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.xz_succ Pell.xz_succ
@[simp]
theorem yz_succ (n : ℕ) : yz a1 (n + 1) = xz a1 n + yz a1 n * az a :=
rfl
#align pell.yz_succ Pell.yz_succ
def pellZd (n : ℕ) : ℤ√(d a1) :=
⟨xn a1 n, yn a1 n⟩
#align pell.pell_zd Pell.pellZd
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_re (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).re = xn a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.pell_zd_re Pell.pellZd_re
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_im (n : ℕ) : (pellZd a1 n).im = yn a1 n :=
rfl
#align pell.pell_zd_im Pell.pellZd_im
theorem isPell_nat {x y : ℕ} : IsPell (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ↔ x * x - d a1 * y * y = 1 :=
⟨fun h =>
Nat.cast_inj.1
(by rw [Int.ofNat_sub (Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat <| Int.le.intro_sub _ h)]; exact h),
fun h =>
show ((x * x : ℕ) - (d a1 * y * y : ℕ) : ℤ) = 1 by
rw [← Int.ofNat_sub <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ h, h]; rfl⟩
#align pell.is_pell_nat Pell.isPell_nat
@[simp]
theorem pellZd_succ (n : ℕ) : pellZd a1 (n + 1) = pellZd a1 n * ⟨a, 1⟩ := by ext <;> simp
#align pell.pell_zd_succ Pell.pellZd_succ
theorem isPell_one : IsPell (⟨a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) :=
show az a * az a - d a1 * 1 * 1 = 1 by simp [dz_val]
#align pell.is_pell_one Pell.isPell_one
theorem isPell_pellZd : ∀ n : ℕ, IsPell (pellZd a1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
let o := isPell_one a1
simp; exact Pell.isPell_mul (isPell_pellZd n) o
#align pell.is_pell_pell_zd Pell.isPell_pellZd
@[simp]
theorem pell_eqz (n : ℕ) : xz a1 n * xz a1 n - d a1 * yz a1 n * yz a1 n = 1 :=
isPell_pellZd a1 n
#align pell.pell_eqz Pell.pell_eqz
@[simp]
theorem pell_eq (n : ℕ) : xn a1 n * xn a1 n - d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n = 1 :=
let pn := pell_eqz a1 n
have h : (↑(xn a1 n * xn a1 n) : ℤ) - ↑(d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n) = 1 := by
repeat' rw [Int.ofNat_mul]; exact pn
have hl : d a1 * yn a1 n * yn a1 n ≤ xn a1 n * xn a1 n :=
Nat.cast_le.1 <| Int.le.intro _ <| add_eq_of_eq_sub' <| Eq.symm h
Nat.cast_inj.1 (by rw [Int.ofNat_sub hl]; exact h)
#align pell.pell_eq Pell.pell_eq
instance dnsq : Zsqrtd.Nonsquare (d a1) :=
⟨fun n h =>
have : n * n + 1 = a * a := by rw [← h]; exact Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (asq_pos a1)
have na : n < a := Nat.mul_self_lt_mul_self_iff.1 (by rw [← this]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self _)
have : (n + 1) * (n + 1) ≤ n * n + 1 := by rw [this]; exact Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self na
have : n + n ≤ 0 :=
@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ (n * n + 1) _ (by ring_nf at this ⊢; assumption)
Nat.ne_of_gt (d_pos a1) <| by
rwa [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero ((Nat.le_add_left _ _).trans this)] at h⟩
#align pell.dnsq Pell.dnsq
theorem xn_ge_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, a ^ n ≤ xn a1 n
| 0 => le_refl 1
| n + 1 => by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, xn_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (xn_ge_a_pow n)) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align pell.xn_ge_a_pow Pell.xn_ge_a_pow
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PellMatiyasevic.lean | 269 | 278 | theorem n_lt_a_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, n < a ^ n
| 0 => Nat.le_refl 1
| n + 1 => by
have IH := n_lt_a_pow n
have : a ^ n + a ^ n ≤ a ^ n * a := by |
rw [← mul_two]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ a1
simp only [_root_.pow_succ, gt_iff_lt]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ this
exact add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le IH (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) IH)
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.ProperSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Cauchy
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Uniformity Topology Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
namespace Metric
#align metric.bounded Bornology.IsBounded
section Bounded
variable {x : α} {s t : Set α} {r : ℝ}
#noalign metric.bounded_iff_is_bounded
#align metric.bounded_empty Bornology.isBounded_empty
#align metric.bounded_iff_mem_bounded Bornology.isBounded_iff_forall_mem
#align metric.bounded.mono Bornology.IsBounded.subset
theorem isBounded_closedBall : IsBounded (closedBall x r) :=
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨r + r, fun y hy z hz =>
calc dist y z ≤ dist y x + dist z x := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ r + r := add_le_add hy hz⟩
#align metric.bounded_closed_ball Metric.isBounded_closedBall
theorem isBounded_ball : IsBounded (ball x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset ball_subset_closedBall
#align metric.bounded_ball Metric.isBounded_ball
theorem isBounded_sphere : IsBounded (sphere x r) :=
isBounded_closedBall.subset sphere_subset_closedBall
#align metric.bounded_sphere Metric.isBounded_sphere
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
⟨fun h ↦ (isBounded_iff.1 (h.insert c)).imp fun _r hr _x hx ↦ hr (.inr hx) (mem_insert _ _),
fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_closedBall.subset hr⟩
#align metric.bounded_iff_subset_ball Metric.isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) :
∃ r, s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
(isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).1 h
#align metric.bounded.subset_ball Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ ball c r :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := h.subset_closedBall c
⟨max r a + 1, (le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _), hr.trans <| closedBall_subset_ball <|
(le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_ball (h : IsBounded s) (c : α) : ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
(h.subset_ball_lt 0 c).imp fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem isBounded_iff_subset_ball (c : α) : IsBounded s ↔ ∃ r, s ⊆ ball c r :=
⟨(IsBounded.subset_ball · c), fun ⟨_r, hr⟩ ↦ isBounded_ball.subset hr⟩
theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt (h : IsBounded s) (a : ℝ) (c : α) :
∃ r, a < r ∧ s ⊆ closedBall c r :=
let ⟨r, har, hr⟩ := h.subset_ball_lt a c
⟨r, har, hr.trans ball_subset_closedBall⟩
#align metric.bounded.subset_ball_lt Bornology.IsBounded.subset_closedBall_lt
theorem isBounded_closure_of_isBounded (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
let ⟨C, h⟩ := isBounded_iff.1 h
isBounded_iff.2 ⟨C, fun _a ha _b hb => isClosed_Iic.closure_subset <|
map_mem_closure₂ continuous_dist ha hb h⟩
#align metric.bounded_closure_of_bounded Metric.isBounded_closure_of_isBounded
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.closure (h : IsBounded s) : IsBounded (closure s) :=
isBounded_closure_of_isBounded h
#align metric.bounded.closure Bornology.IsBounded.closure
@[simp]
theorem isBounded_closure_iff : IsBounded (closure s) ↔ IsBounded s :=
⟨fun h => h.subset subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align metric.bounded_closure_iff Metric.isBounded_closure_iff
#align metric.bounded_union Bornology.isBounded_union
#align metric.bounded.union Bornology.IsBounded.union
#align metric.bounded_bUnion Bornology.isBounded_biUnion
#align metric.bounded.prod Bornology.IsBounded.prod
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_closedBall (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (closedBall c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall c).trans <| by simp⟩
theorem hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball (c : α) :
(cobounded α).HasBasis (fun _ ↦ True) (fun r ↦ (ball c r)ᶜ) :=
⟨compl_surjective.forall.2 fun _ ↦ (isBounded_iff_subset_ball c).trans <| by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem comap_dist_right_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist · c) atTop = cobounded α :=
(atTop_basis.comap _).eq_of_same_basis <| by
simpa only [compl_def, mem_ball, not_lt] using hasBasis_cobounded_compl_ball c
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Bounded.lean | 133 | 134 | theorem comap_dist_left_atTop (c : α) : comap (dist c) atTop = cobounded α := by |
simpa only [dist_comm _ c] using comap_dist_right_atTop c
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
#align_import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
#align real.volume_eq_stieltjes_id Real.volume_eq_stieltjes_id
theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
#align real.volume_val Real.volume_val
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Ico Real.volume_Ico
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Icc Real.volume_Icc
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Ioo Real.volume_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_Ioc Real.volume_Ioc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [volume_val]
#align real.volume_singleton Real.volume_singleton
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this, after mathlib4#4628
theorem volume_univ : volume (univ : Set ℝ) = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r =>
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Icc (0 : ℝ) r) := by simp
_ ≤ volume univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align real.volume_univ Real.volume_univ
@[simp]
theorem volume_ball (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.ball a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [ball_eq_Ioo, volume_Ioo, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
#align real.volume_ball Real.volume_ball
@[simp]
theorem volume_closedBall (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, volume_Icc, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
#align real.volume_closed_ball Real.volume_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_ball (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [Metric.emetric_ball_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_ball_nnreal, volume_ball, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
#align real.volume_emetric_ball Real.volume_emetric_ball
@[simp]
theorem volume_emetric_closedBall (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr)
· rw [EMetric.closedBall_top, volume_univ, two_mul, _root_.top_add]
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
rw [Metric.emetric_closedBall_nnreal, volume_closedBall, two_mul, ← NNReal.coe_add,
ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ENNReal.coe_add, two_mul]
#align real.volume_emetric_closed_ball Real.volume_emetric_closedBall
instance noAtoms_volume : NoAtoms (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun _ => volume_singleton⟩
#align real.has_no_atoms_volume Real.noAtoms_volume
@[simp]
theorem volume_interval {a b : ℝ} : volume (uIcc a b) = ofReal |b - a| := by
rw [← Icc_min_max, volume_Icc, max_sub_min_eq_abs]
#align real.volume_interval Real.volume_interval
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioi {a : ℝ} : volume (Ioi a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo a (a + n)) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Ioi a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
#align real.volume_Ioi Real.volume_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ici {a : ℝ} : volume (Ici a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Ioi_ae_eq_Ici]; simp
#align real.volume_Ici Real.volume_Ici
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iio {a : ℝ} : volume (Iio a) = ∞ :=
top_unique <|
le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n =>
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Ioo (a - n) a) := by simp
_ ≤ volume (Iio a) := measure_mono Ioo_subset_Iio_self
#align real.volume_Iio Real.volume_Iio
@[simp]
theorem volume_Iic {a : ℝ} : volume (Iic a) = ∞ := by rw [← measure_congr Iio_ae_eq_Iic]; simp
#align real.volume_Iic Real.volume_Iic
instance locallyFinite_volume : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure ℝ) :=
⟨fun x =>
⟨Ioo (x - 1) (x + 1),
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨sub_lt_self _ zero_lt_one, lt_add_of_pos_right _ zero_lt_one⟩, by
simp only [Real.volume_Ioo, ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top]⟩⟩
#align real.locally_finite_volume Real.locallyFinite_volume
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Icc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Icc Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Icc
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ico x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Ico Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ico
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioc x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Ioc Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioc
instance isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo (x y : ℝ) : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Ioo x y)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align real.is_finite_measure_restrict_Ioo Real.isFiniteMeasure_restrict_Ioo
theorem volume_le_diam (s : Set ℝ) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s := by
by_cases hs : Bornology.IsBounded s
· rw [Real.ediam_eq hs, ← volume_Icc]
exact volume.mono hs.subset_Icc_sInf_sSup
· rw [Metric.ediam_of_unbounded hs]; exact le_top
#align real.volume_le_diam Real.volume_le_diam
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real {p : ℝ → Prop} {a : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < volume { x | p x } := by
rcases h.exists_Ioo_subset with ⟨l, u, hx, hs⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (measure_mono hs)
simpa [-mem_Ioo] using hx.1.trans hx.2
#align filter.eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real Filter.Eventually.volume_pos_of_nhds_real
theorem volume_Icc_pi {a b : ι → ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) := by
rw [← pi_univ_Icc, volume_pi_pi]
simp only [Real.volume_Icc]
#align real.volume_Icc_pi Real.volume_Icc_pi
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc_pi_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (Icc a b)).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_Icc_pi, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_Icc_pi_to_real Real.volume_Icc_pi_toReal
theorem volume_pi_Ioo {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioo_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
#align real.volume_pi_Ioo Real.volume_pi_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioo_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioo (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioo, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_pi_Ioo_to_real Real.volume_pi_Ioo_toReal
theorem volume_pi_Ioc {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ioc_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
#align real.volume_pi_Ioc Real.volume_pi_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ioc_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ioc (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ioc, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_pi_Ioc_to_real Real.volume_pi_Ioc_toReal
theorem volume_pi_Ico {a b : ι → ℝ} :
volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i)) = ∏ i, ENNReal.ofReal (b i - a i) :=
(measure_congr Measure.univ_pi_Ico_ae_eq_Icc).trans volume_Icc_pi
#align real.volume_pi_Ico Real.volume_pi_Ico
@[simp]
theorem volume_pi_Ico_toReal {a b : ι → ℝ} (h : a ≤ b) :
(volume (pi univ fun i => Ico (a i) (b i))).toReal = ∏ i, (b i - a i) := by
simp only [volume_pi_Ico, ENNReal.toReal_prod, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sub_nonneg.2 (h _))]
#align real.volume_pi_Ico_to_real Real.volume_pi_Ico_toReal
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_ball (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
volume (Metric.ball a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_ball a hr, volume_ball, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr.le) _).symm
#align real.volume_pi_ball Real.volume_pi_ball
@[simp]
nonrec theorem volume_pi_closedBall (a : ι → ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ENNReal.ofReal ((2 * r) ^ Fintype.card ι) := by
simp only [MeasureTheory.volume_pi_closedBall a hr, volume_closedBall, Finset.prod_const]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_pow (mul_nonneg zero_le_two hr) _).symm
#align real.volume_pi_closed_ball Real.volume_pi_closedBall
theorem volume_pi_le_prod_diam (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) :
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
calc
volume s ≤ volume (pi univ fun i => closure (Function.eval i '' s)) :=
volume.mono <|
Subset.trans (subset_pi_eval_image univ s) <| pi_mono fun _ _ => subset_closure
_ = ∏ i, volume (closure <| Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_pi _
_ ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => (volume_le_diam _).trans_eq (EMetric.diam_closure _)
#align real.volume_pi_le_prod_diam Real.volume_pi_le_prod_diam
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 281 | 287 | theorem volume_pi_le_diam_pow (s : Set (ι → ℝ)) : volume s ≤ EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι :=
calc
volume s ≤ ∏ i : ι, EMetric.diam (Function.eval i '' s) := volume_pi_le_prod_diam s
_ ≤ ∏ _i : ι, (1 : ℝ≥0) * EMetric.diam s :=
(Finset.prod_le_prod' fun i _ => (LipschitzWith.eval i).ediam_image_le s)
_ = EMetric.diam s ^ Fintype.card ι := by |
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, Finset.prod_const, Fintype.card]
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.Basic
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
open Nat
section Euler
section Legendre
open ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
def legendreSym (a : ℤ) : ℤ :=
quadraticChar (ZMod p) a
#align legendre_sym legendreSym
namespace legendreSym
theorem eq_pow (a : ℤ) : (legendreSym p a : ZMod p) = (a : ZMod p) ^ (p / 2) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (ringChar (ZMod p)) 2 with hc | hc
· by_cases ha : (a : ZMod p) = 0
· rw [legendreSym, ha, quadraticChar_zero,
zero_pow (Nat.div_pos (@Fact.out p.Prime).two_le (succ_pos 1)).ne']
norm_cast
· have := (ringChar_zmod_n p).symm.trans hc
-- p = 2
subst p
rw [legendreSym, quadraticChar_eq_one_of_char_two hc ha]
revert ha
push_cast
generalize (a : ZMod 2) = b; fin_cases b
· tauto
· simp
· convert quadraticChar_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two' hc (a : ZMod p)
exact (card p).symm
#align legendre_sym.eq_pow legendreSym.eq_pow
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ∨ legendreSym p a = -1 :=
quadraticChar_dichotomy ha
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_or_neg_one legendreSym.eq_one_or_neg_one
theorem eq_neg_one_iff_not_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬legendreSym p a = 1 :=
quadraticChar_eq_neg_one_iff_not_one ha
#align legendre_sym.eq_neg_one_iff_not_one legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff_not_one
theorem eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = 0 ↔ (a : ZMod p) = 0 :=
quadraticChar_eq_zero_iff
#align legendre_sym.eq_zero_iff legendreSym.eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem at_zero : legendreSym p 0 = 0 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_zero, MulChar.map_zero]
#align legendre_sym.at_zero legendreSym.at_zero
@[simp]
theorem at_one : legendreSym p 1 = 1 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_one, MulChar.map_one]
#align legendre_sym.at_one legendreSym.at_one
protected theorem mul (a b : ℤ) : legendreSym p (a * b) = legendreSym p a * legendreSym p b := by
simp [legendreSym, Int.cast_mul, map_mul, quadraticCharFun_mul]
#align legendre_sym.mul legendreSym.mul
@[simps]
def hom : ℤ →*₀ ℤ where
toFun := legendreSym p
map_zero' := at_zero p
map_one' := at_one p
map_mul' := legendreSym.mul p
#align legendre_sym.hom legendreSym.hom
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a ^ 2 = 1 :=
quadraticChar_sq_one ha
#align legendre_sym.sq_one legendreSym.sq_one
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p (a ^ 2) = 1 := by
dsimp only [legendreSym]
rw [Int.cast_pow]
exact quadraticChar_sq_one' ha
#align legendre_sym.sq_one' legendreSym.sq_one'
protected theorem mod (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = legendreSym p (a % p) := by
simp only [legendreSym, intCast_mod]
#align legendre_sym.mod legendreSym.mod
theorem eq_one_iff {a : ℤ} (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 ↔ IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
quadraticChar_one_iff_isSquare ha0
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_iff legendreSym.eq_one_iff
theorem eq_one_iff' {a : ℕ} (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ↔ IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [eq_one_iff]
· norm_cast
· exact mod_cast ha0
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_iff' legendreSym.eq_one_iff'
theorem eq_neg_one_iff {a : ℤ} : legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
quadraticChar_neg_one_iff_not_isSquare
#align legendre_sym.eq_neg_one_iff legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/Basic.lean | 207 | 208 | theorem eq_neg_one_iff' {a : ℕ} : legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by |
rw [eq_neg_one_iff]; norm_cast
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ p₁ p₂ : P}
nonrec def angle (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) (p3 -ᵥ p2)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle EuclideanGeometry.angle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp
((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_angle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_angle
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
#align affine_isometry.angle_map AffineIsometry.angle_map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.angle_coe {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (p₁ p₂ p₃ : s) :
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
∠ (p₁ : P) (p₂ : P) (p₃ : P) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
s.subtypeₐᵢ.angle_map p₁ p₂ p₃
#align affine_subspace.angle_coe AffineSubspace.angle_coe
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vadd (v : V) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) (v +ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVAdd ℝ P v).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_vadd EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_vadd
@[simp]
theorem angle_vadd_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (p : P) : ∠ (v₁ +ᵥ p) (v₂ +ᵥ p) (v₃ +ᵥ p) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_vadd_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_vadd_const
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vsub (p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (p -ᵥ p₁) (p -ᵥ p₂) (p -ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVSub ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_vsub EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_vsub
@[simp]
theorem angle_vsub_const (p₁ p₂ p₃ p : P) : ∠ (p₁ -ᵥ p) (p₂ -ᵥ p) (p₃ -ᵥ p) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).symm.toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_vsub_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_vsub_const
@[simp]
theorem angle_add_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ + v) (v₂ + v) (v₃ + v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_vadd_const _ _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_add_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_add_const
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_add (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v + v₁) (v + v₂) (v + v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_const_vadd _ _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_add EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_add
@[simp]
theorem angle_sub_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ - v) (v₂ - v) (v₃ - v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_vsub_const v₁ v₂ v₃ v
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_sub_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_sub_const
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_sub (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v - v₁) (v - v₂) (v - v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_const_vsub v v₁ v₂ v₃
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_sub EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_sub
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (-v₁) (-v₂) (-v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using angle_const_sub 0 v₁ v₂ v₃
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_neg EuclideanGeometry.angle_neg
nonrec theorem angle_comm (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = ∠ p3 p2 p1 :=
angle_comm _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_comm EuclideanGeometry.angle_comm
nonrec theorem angle_nonneg (p1 p2 p3 : P) : 0 ≤ ∠ p1 p2 p3 :=
angle_nonneg _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_nonneg EuclideanGeometry.angle_nonneg
nonrec theorem angle_le_pi (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ∠ p1 p2 p3 ≤ π :=
angle_le_pi _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_le_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_le_pi
@[simp] lemma angle_self_left (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p₀ p₀ p = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [vsub_self]
exact angle_zero_left _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_left EuclideanGeometry.angle_self_left
@[simp] lemma angle_self_right (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p p₀ p₀ = π / 2 := by rw [angle_comm, angle_self_left]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_right EuclideanGeometry.angle_self_right
theorem angle_self_of_ne (h : p ≠ p₀) : ∠ p p₀ p = 0 := angle_self $ vsub_ne_zero.2 h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_of_ne EuclideanGeometry.angle_self_of_ne
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-14")] alias angle_eq_left := angle_self_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-14")] alias angle_eq_right := angle_self_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-14")] alias angle_eq_of_ne := angle_self_of_ne
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) : ∠ p2 p1 p3 = 0 := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨hp1p2, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
unfold angle
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_ne_zero] at hp1p2
use hp1p2, -r + 1, add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p1 p2, smul_neg]
simp [← hpr]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) :
∠ p2 p3 p1 = 0 := by
rw [angle_comm] at h
exact angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi (p1 : P) {p2 p3 p4 : P} (h : ∠ p2 p3 p4 = π) :
∠ p1 p2 p3 = ∠ p1 p2 p4 := by
unfold angle at *
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
rw [eq_comm]
convert angle_smul_right_of_pos (p1 -ᵥ p2) (p3 -ᵥ p2) (add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one)
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p2 p3, smul_neg, neg_smul, ← hpr]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi
nonrec theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi (p1 : P) {p2 p3 p4 : P} (h : ∠ p2 p3 p4 = π) :
∠ p1 p3 p2 + ∠ p1 p3 p4 = π := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_comm p1 p3 p2, angle_comm p1 p3 p4]
unfold angle
exact angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi _ h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 : P} (hapc : ∠ p1 p5 p3 = π)
(hbpd : ∠ p2 p5 p4 = π) : ∠ p1 p5 p2 = ∠ p3 p5 p4 := by
linarith [angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p1 hbpd, angle_comm p4 p5 p1,
angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p4 hapc, angle_comm p4 p5 p3]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) : dist p1 p2 ≠ 0 := by
by_contra heq
rw [dist_eq_zero] at heq
rw [heq, angle_self_left] at h
exact Real.pi_ne_zero (by linarith)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) : dist p3 p2 ≠ 0 :=
left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi <| (angle_comm _ _ _).trans h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) :
dist p1 p3 = dist p1 p2 + dist p3 p2 := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (hp1p2 : p1 ≠ p2) (hp3p2 : p3 ≠ p2) :
dist p1 p3 = dist p1 p2 + dist p3 p2 ↔ ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi (fun he => hp1p2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
hp3p2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_of_angle_eq_zero {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = 0) :
dist p1 p3 = |dist p1 p2 - dist p3 p2| := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_of_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_iff_angle_eq_zero {p1 p2 p3 : P} (hp1p2 : p1 ≠ p2) (hp3p2 : p3 ≠ p2) :
dist p1 p3 = |dist p1 p2 - dist p3 p2| ↔ ∠ p1 p2 p3 = 0 := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero (fun he => hp1p2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he))
fun he => hp3p2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_iff_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem angle_midpoint_eq_pi (p1 p2 : P) (hp1p2 : p1 ≠ p2) : ∠ p1 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) p2 = π := by
simp only [angle, left_vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, right_vsub_midpoint, inv_pos, zero_lt_two,
angle_smul_right_of_pos, angle_smul_left_of_pos]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p1 p2]
apply angle_self_neg_of_nonzero
simpa only [ne_eq, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_midpoint_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_midpoint_eq_pi
theorem angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : dist p3 p1 = dist p3 p2) :
∠ p3 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) p1 = π / 2 := by
let m : P := midpoint ℝ p1 p2
have h1 : p3 -ᵥ p1 = p3 -ᵥ m - (p1 -ᵥ m) := (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p3 p1 m).symm
have h2 : p3 -ᵥ p2 = p3 -ᵥ m + (p1 -ᵥ m) := by
rw [left_vsub_midpoint, ← midpoint_vsub_right, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p3 p1, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p3 p2, h1, h2] at h
exact (norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (p3 -ᵥ m) (p1 -ᵥ m)).mp h.symm
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem angle_right_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : dist p3 p1 = dist p3 p2) :
∠ p3 (midpoint ℝ p1 p2) p2 = π / 2 := by
rw [midpoint_comm p1 p2, angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h.symm]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_right_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.angle_right_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff]
rcases h with ⟨⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, hp₂⟩, hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃⟩
refine ⟨vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂p₁.symm, -(1 - r) / r, ?_⟩
have hr0' : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₁
simp at hp₂p₁
have hr1' : r ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₃
simp at hp₂p₃
replace hr0 := hr0.lt_of_ne hr0'.symm
replace hr1 := hr1.lt_of_ne hr1'
refine ⟨div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 (sub_pos.2 hr1)) hr0, ?_⟩
rw [← hp₂, AffineMap.lineMap_apply, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self,
zero_sub, smul_neg, smul_smul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hr0', neg_smul, neg_neg, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ←
add_smul, sub_add_cancel, one_smul]
#align sbtw.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi Sbtw.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [← h.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi, angle_comm]
#align sbtw.angle₃₂₁_eq_pi Sbtw.angle₃₂₁_eq_pi
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi⟩
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff]
rintro ⟨hp₁p₂, r, hr, hp₃p₂⟩
refine ⟨⟨1 / (1 - r), ⟨div_nonneg zero_le_one (sub_nonneg.2 (hr.le.trans zero_le_one)),
(div_le_one (sub_pos.2 (hr.trans zero_lt_one))).2 ((le_sub_self_iff 1).2 hr.le)⟩, ?_⟩,
(vsub_ne_zero.1 hp₁p₂).symm, ?_⟩
· rw [← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hp₃p₂
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, hp₃p₂, vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, smul_neg, ←
neg_smul, smul_add, smul_smul, ← add_smul, eq_comm, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
convert (one_smul ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁)).symm
field_simp [(sub_pos.2 (hr.trans zero_lt_one)).ne.symm]
ring
· rw [ne_comm, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, hp₃p₂, smul_ne_zero_iff]
exact ⟨hr.ne, hp₁p₂⟩
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) :
∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
rw [angle, angle_eq_zero_iff]
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, rfl⟩
have hr0' : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp at hp₂p₁
replace hr0 := hr0.lt_of_ne hr0'.symm
refine ⟨vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂p₁, r⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hr0, ?_⟩
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self, add_zero, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hr0',
one_smul]
#align wbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne Wbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_left
#align sbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero Sbtw.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) :
∠ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by rw [← h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁, angle_comm]
#align wbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne Wbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_left
#align sbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero Sbtw.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₃
#align wbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne Wbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_right
#align sbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero Sbtw.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero_of_ne {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₃
#align wbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero_of_ne Wbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero_of_ne
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero_of_ne h.ne_right
#align sbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero Sbtw.angle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ p₁ ≠ p₂ ∧ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ p₃ ≠ p₂ ∧ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
constructor
· rw [angle, angle_eq_zero_iff]
rintro ⟨hp₁p₂, r, hr0, hp₃p₂⟩
rcases le_or_lt 1 r with (hr1 | hr1)
· refine Or.inl ⟨vsub_ne_zero.1 hp₁p₂, r⁻¹, ⟨(inv_pos.2 hr0).le, inv_le_one hr1⟩, ?_⟩
rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, hp₃p₂, smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hr0.ne.symm, one_smul,
vsub_vadd]
· refine Or.inr ⟨?_, r, ⟨hr0.le, hr1.le⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V, hp₃p₂, smul_ne_zero_iff]
exact ⟨hr0.ne.symm, hp₁p₂⟩
· rw [AffineMap.lineMap_apply, ← hp₃p₂, vsub_vadd]
· rintro (⟨hp₁p₂, h⟩ | ⟨hp₃p₂, h⟩)
· exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₁p₂
· exact h.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne hp₃p₂
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff_eq_and_ne_or_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ p₁ = p₃ ∧ p₁ ≠ p₂ ∨ Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₁p₃ : p₁ = p₃; · simp [hp₁p₃]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₁p₃, Ne.symm hp₁p₃, Sbtw, hp₃p₂]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_zero_iff_eq_and_ne_or_sbtw EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_zero_iff_eq_and_ne_or_sbtw
theorem collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂ ∨ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· replace h := h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw
by_cases h₁₂ : p₁ = p₂
· exact Or.inl h₁₂
by_cases h₃₂ : p₃ = p₂
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl h₃₂)
rw [or_iff_right h₁₂, or_iff_right h₃₂]
rcases h with (h | h | h)
· exact Or.inr (angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 ⟨h, Ne.symm h₁₂, Ne.symm h₃₂⟩)
· exact Or.inl (h.angle₃₁₂_eq_zero_of_ne h₃₂)
· exact Or.inl (h.angle₂₃₁_eq_zero_of_ne h₁₂)
· rcases h with (rfl | rfl | h | h)
· simpa using collinear_pair ℝ p₁ p₃
· simpa using collinear_pair ℝ p₁ p₃
· rw [angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw] at h
rcases h with (⟨-, h⟩ | ⟨-, h⟩)
· rw [Set.insert_comm]
exact h.collinear
· rw [Set.insert_comm, Set.pair_comm]
exact h.collinear
· rw [angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw] at h
exact h.wbtw.collinear
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi
theorem collinear_of_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) :=
collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl h
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_of_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.collinear_of_angle_eq_zero
theorem collinear_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) :=
collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.collinear_of_angle_eq_pi
theorem angle_ne_zero_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 :=
mt collinear_of_angle_eq_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_ne_zero_of_not_collinear EuclideanGeometry.angle_ne_zero_of_not_collinear
theorem angle_ne_pi_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π :=
mt collinear_of_angle_eq_pi h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_ne_pi_of_not_collinear EuclideanGeometry.angle_ne_pi_of_not_collinear
theorem angle_pos_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
0 < ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(angle_nonneg _ _ _).lt_of_ne (angle_ne_zero_of_not_collinear h).symm
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_pos_of_not_collinear EuclideanGeometry.angle_pos_of_not_collinear
theorem angle_lt_pi_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ < π :=
(angle_le_pi _ _ _).lt_of_ne <| angle_ne_pi_of_not_collinear h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_lt_pi_of_not_collinear EuclideanGeometry.angle_lt_pi_of_not_collinear
nonrec theorem cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Real.cos (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = 1 ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 :=
cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero
nonrec theorem cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Real.cos (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 :=
cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
nonrec theorem cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Real.cos (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = -1 ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi
nonrec theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Real.sin (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi
nonrec theorem sin_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Real.sin (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = 1 ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 :=
sin_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_sin_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ p₁ = p₂ ∨ p₃ = p₂ ∨ Real.sin (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = 0 := by
rw [sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi,
collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi]
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_sin_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.collinear_iff_eq_or_eq_or_sin_eq_zero
theorem sin_pos_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
0 < Real.sin (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) :=
Real.sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (angle_pos_of_not_collinear h) (angle_lt_pi_of_not_collinear h)
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_pos_of_not_collinear EuclideanGeometry.sin_pos_of_not_collinear
theorem sin_ne_zero_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P)) :
Real.sin (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (sin_pos_of_not_collinear h)
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_ne_zero_of_not_collinear EuclideanGeometry.sin_ne_zero_of_not_collinear
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 537 | 541 | theorem collinear_of_sin_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Real.sin (∠ p₁ p₂ p₃) = 0) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by |
revert h
contrapose
exact sin_ne_zero_of_not_collinear
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
#align_import category_theory.subobject.limits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"956af7c76589f444f2e1313911bad16366ea476d"
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
section Equalizer
variable (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasEqualizer f g]
abbrev equalizerSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (equalizer.ι f g)
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject
def equalizerSubobjectIso : (equalizerSubobject f g : C) ≅ equalizer f g :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (equalizer.ι f g)
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobjectIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).hom ≫ equalizer.ι f g = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Limits.lean | 56 | 58 | theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow' :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).inv ≫ (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow = equalizer.ι f g := by |
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Logic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.Tactic.Coe
set_option autoImplicit true
-- We align Lean 3 lemmas with lemmas in `Init.SimpLemmas` in Lean 4.
#align band_self Bool.and_self
#align band_tt Bool.and_true
#align band_ff Bool.and_false
#align tt_band Bool.true_and
#align ff_band Bool.false_and
#align bor_self Bool.or_self
#align bor_tt Bool.or_true
#align bor_ff Bool.or_false
#align tt_bor Bool.true_or
#align ff_bor Bool.false_or
#align bnot_bnot Bool.not_not
namespace Bool
#align bool.cond_tt Bool.cond_true
#align bool.cond_ff Bool.cond_false
#align cond_a_a Bool.cond_self
attribute [simp] xor_self
#align bxor_self Bool.xor_self
#align bxor_tt Bool.xor_true
#align bxor_ff Bool.xor_false
#align tt_bxor Bool.true_xor
#align ff_bxor Bool.false_xor
| Mathlib/Init/Data/Bool/Lemmas.lean | 48 | 48 | theorem true_eq_false_eq_False : ¬true = false := by | decide
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import data.fin.tuple.nat_antidiagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
namespace List.Nat
def antidiagonalTuple : ∀ k, ℕ → List (Fin k → ℕ)
| 0, 0 => [![]]
| 0, _ + 1 => []
| k + 1, n =>
(List.Nat.antidiagonal n).bind fun ni =>
(antidiagonalTuple k ni.2).map fun x => Fin.cons ni.1 x
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_zero : antidiagonalTuple 0 0 = [![]] :=
rfl
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple_zero_zero List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : antidiagonalTuple 0 (n + 1) = [] :=
rfl
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple_zero_succ List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_zero_succ
theorem mem_antidiagonalTuple {n : ℕ} {k : ℕ} {x : Fin k → ℕ} :
x ∈ antidiagonalTuple k n ↔ ∑ i, x i = n := by
induction x using Fin.consInduction generalizing n with
| h0 =>
cases n
· decide
· simp [eq_comm]
| h x₀ x ih =>
simp_rw [Fin.sum_cons]
rw [antidiagonalTuple] -- Porting note: simp_rw doesn't use the equation lemma properly
simp_rw [List.mem_bind, List.mem_map,
List.Nat.mem_antidiagonal, Fin.cons_eq_cons, exists_eq_right_right, ih,
@eq_comm _ _ (Prod.snd _), and_comm (a := Prod.snd _ = _),
← Prod.mk.inj_iff (a₁ := Prod.fst _), exists_eq_right]
#align list.nat.mem_antidiagonal_tuple List.Nat.mem_antidiagonalTuple
theorem nodup_antidiagonalTuple (k n : ℕ) : List.Nodup (antidiagonalTuple k n) := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing n
· cases n
· simp
· simp [eq_comm]
simp_rw [antidiagonalTuple, List.nodup_bind]
constructor
· intro i _
exact (ih i.snd).map (Fin.cons_right_injective (α := fun _ => ℕ) i.fst)
induction' n with n n_ih
· exact List.pairwise_singleton _ _
· rw [List.Nat.antidiagonal_succ]
refine List.Pairwise.cons (fun a ha x hx₁ hx₂ => ?_) (n_ih.map _ fun a b h x hx₁ hx₂ => ?_)
· rw [List.mem_map] at hx₁ hx₂ ha
obtain ⟨⟨a, -, rfl⟩, ⟨x₁, -, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, -, h⟩⟩ := ha, hx₁, hx₂
rw [Fin.cons_eq_cons] at h
injection h.1
· rw [List.mem_map] at hx₁ hx₂
obtain ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂, h₁₂⟩⟩ := hx₁, hx₂
dsimp at h₁₂
rw [Fin.cons_eq_cons, Nat.succ_inj'] at h₁₂
obtain ⟨h₁₂, rfl⟩ := h₁₂
rw [h₁₂] at h
exact h (List.mem_map_of_mem _ hx₁) (List.mem_map_of_mem _ hx₂)
#align list.nat.nodup_antidiagonal_tuple List.Nat.nodup_antidiagonalTuple
theorem antidiagonalTuple_zero_right : ∀ k, antidiagonalTuple k 0 = [0]
| 0 => (congr_arg fun x => [x]) <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
| k + 1 => by
rw [antidiagonalTuple, antidiagonal_zero, List.bind_singleton, antidiagonalTuple_zero_right k,
List.map_singleton]
exact congr_arg (fun x => [x]) Matrix.cons_zero_zero
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple_zero_right List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonalTuple_one (n : ℕ) : antidiagonalTuple 1 n = [![n]] := by
simp_rw [antidiagonalTuple, antidiagonal, List.range_succ, List.map_append, List.map_singleton,
tsub_self, List.append_bind, List.bind_singleton, List.map_bind]
conv_rhs => rw [← List.nil_append [![n]]]
congr 1
simp_rw [List.bind_eq_nil, List.mem_range, List.map_eq_nil]
intro x hx
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hx
rw [add_assoc, add_tsub_cancel_left, antidiagonalTuple_zero_succ]
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_tuple_one List.Nat.antidiagonalTuple_one
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 142 | 147 | theorem antidiagonalTuple_two (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonalTuple 2 n = (antidiagonal n).map fun i => ![i.1, i.2] := by |
rw [antidiagonalTuple]
simp_rw [antidiagonalTuple_one, List.map_singleton]
rw [List.map_eq_bind]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Interval
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.ADE_inequality from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0a0ec35061ed9960bf0e7ffb0335f44447b58977"
namespace ADEInequality
open Multiset
-- Porting note: ADE is a special name, exceptionally in upper case in Lean3
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
def A' (q r : ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ+ :=
{1, q, r}
#align ADE_inequality.A' ADEInequality.A'
def A (r : ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ+ :=
A' 1 r
#align ADE_inequality.A ADEInequality.A
def D' (r : ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ+ :=
{2, 2, r}
#align ADE_inequality.D' ADEInequality.D'
def E' (r : ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ+ :=
{2, 3, r}
#align ADE_inequality.E' ADEInequality.E'
def E6 : Multiset ℕ+ :=
E' 3
#align ADE_inequality.E6 ADEInequality.E6
def E7 : Multiset ℕ+ :=
E' 4
#align ADE_inequality.E7 ADEInequality.E7
def E8 : Multiset ℕ+ :=
E' 5
#align ADE_inequality.E8 ADEInequality.E8
def sumInv (pqr : Multiset ℕ+) : ℚ :=
Multiset.sum (pqr.map fun (x : ℕ+) => x⁻¹)
#align ADE_inequality.sum_inv ADEInequality.sumInv
theorem sumInv_pqr (p q r : ℕ+) : sumInv {p, q, r} = (p : ℚ)⁻¹ + (q : ℚ)⁻¹ + (r : ℚ)⁻¹ := by
simp only [sumInv, add_zero, insert_eq_cons, add_assoc, map_cons, sum_cons,
map_singleton, sum_singleton]
#align ADE_inequality.sum_inv_pqr ADEInequality.sumInv_pqr
def Admissible (pqr : Multiset ℕ+) : Prop :=
(∃ q r, A' q r = pqr) ∨ (∃ r, D' r = pqr) ∨ E' 3 = pqr ∨ E' 4 = pqr ∨ E' 5 = pqr
#align ADE_inequality.admissible ADEInequality.Admissible
theorem admissible_A' (q r : ℕ+) : Admissible (A' q r) :=
Or.inl ⟨q, r, rfl⟩
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_A' ADEInequality.admissible_A'
theorem admissible_D' (n : ℕ+) : Admissible (D' n) :=
Or.inr <| Or.inl ⟨n, rfl⟩
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_D' ADEInequality.admissible_D'
theorem admissible_E'3 : Admissible (E' 3) :=
Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_E'3 ADEInequality.admissible_E'3
theorem admissible_E'4 : Admissible (E' 4) :=
Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_E'4 ADEInequality.admissible_E'4
theorem admissible_E'5 : Admissible (E' 5) :=
Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_E'5 ADEInequality.admissible_E'5
theorem admissible_E6 : Admissible E6 :=
admissible_E'3
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_E6 ADEInequality.admissible_E6
theorem admissible_E7 : Admissible E7 :=
admissible_E'4
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_E7 ADEInequality.admissible_E7
theorem admissible_E8 : Admissible E8 :=
admissible_E'5
#align ADE_inequality.admissible_E8 ADEInequality.admissible_E8
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ADEInequality.lean | 160 | 172 | theorem Admissible.one_lt_sumInv {pqr : Multiset ℕ+} : Admissible pqr → 1 < sumInv pqr := by |
rw [Admissible]
rintro (⟨p', q', H⟩ | ⟨n, H⟩ | H | H | H)
· rw [← H, A', sumInv_pqr, add_assoc]
simp only [lt_add_iff_pos_right, PNat.one_coe, inv_one, Nat.cast_one]
apply add_pos <;> simp only [PNat.pos, Nat.cast_pos, inv_pos]
· rw [← H, D', sumInv_pqr]
conv_rhs => simp only [OfNat.ofNat, PNat.mk_coe]
norm_num
all_goals
rw [← H, E', sumInv_pqr]
conv_rhs => simp only [OfNat.ofNat, PNat.mk_coe]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.ZPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Deriv
#align_import analysis.convex.specific_functions.deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a16665637b378379689c566204817ae792ac8b39"
open Real Set
open scoped NNReal
theorem strictConvexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : StrictConvexOn ℝ (Ici 0) fun x : ℝ => x ^ n := by
apply StrictMonoOn.strictConvexOn_of_deriv (convex_Ici _) (continuousOn_pow _)
rw [deriv_pow', interior_Ici]
exact fun x (hx : 0 < x) y _ hxy => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
(pow_lt_pow_left hxy hx.le <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn) (by positivity)
#align strict_convex_on_pow strictConvexOn_pow
theorem Even.strictConvexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) (h : n ≠ 0) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ Set.univ fun x : ℝ => x ^ n := by
apply StrictMono.strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv (continuous_pow n)
rw [deriv_pow']
replace h := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
exact StrictMono.const_mul (Odd.strictMono_pow <| Nat.Even.sub_odd h hn <| Nat.odd_iff.2 rfl)
(Nat.cast_pos.2 h)
#align even.strict_convex_on_pow Even.strictConvexOn_pow
theorem Finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even {α β : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing β] {f : α → β}
[DecidablePred fun x => f x ≤ 0] {s : Finset α} (h0 : Even (s.filter fun x => f x ≤ 0).card) :
0 ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
calc
0 ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, (if f x ≤ 0 then (-1 : β) else 1) * f x :=
Finset.prod_nonneg fun x _ => by
split_ifs with hx
· simp [hx]
simp? at hx ⊢ says simp only [not_le, one_mul] at hx ⊢
exact le_of_lt hx
_ = _ := by
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_ite, Finset.prod_const_one, mul_one,
Finset.prod_const, neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, Nat.even_iff.1 h0, pow_zero, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even Finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/SpecificFunctions/Deriv.lean | 72 | 85 | theorem int_prod_range_nonneg (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (hn : Even n) :
0 ≤ ∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, (m - k) := by |
rcases hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
induction' n with n ihn
· simp
rw [← two_mul] at ihn
rw [← two_mul, mul_add, mul_one, ← one_add_one_eq_two, ← add_assoc,
Finset.prod_range_succ, Finset.prod_range_succ, mul_assoc]
refine mul_nonneg ihn ?_; generalize (1 + 1) * n = k
rcases le_or_lt m k with hmk | hmk
· have : m ≤ k + 1 := hmk.trans (lt_add_one (k : ℤ)).le
convert mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos_of_le hmk) _
convert sub_nonpos_of_le this
· exact mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le hmk.le) (sub_nonneg_of_le hmk)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Denumerable
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
#align_import data.real.cardinality from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e7aaccf9b0182576cabdde36cf1b5ad3585b70d"
open Nat Set
open Cardinal
noncomputable section
namespace Cardinal
variable {c : ℝ} {f g : ℕ → Bool} {n : ℕ}
def cantorFunctionAux (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
cond (f n) (c ^ n) 0
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_true (h : f n = true) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_tt Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_true
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_false (h : f n = false) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0 := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_ff Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_false
theorem cantorFunctionAux_nonneg (h : 0 ≤ c) : 0 ≤ cantorFunctionAux c f n := by
cases h' : f n <;> simp [h']
apply pow_nonneg h
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_nonneg Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_nonneg
theorem cantorFunctionAux_eq (h : f n = g n) :
cantorFunctionAux c f n = cantorFunctionAux c g n := by simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_eq Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_eq
theorem cantorFunctionAux_zero (f : ℕ → Bool) : cantorFunctionAux c f 0 = cond (f 0) 1 0 := by
cases h : f 0 <;> simp [h]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_zero Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_zero
theorem cantorFunctionAux_succ (f : ℕ → Bool) :
(fun n => cantorFunctionAux c f (n + 1)) = fun n =>
c * cantorFunctionAux c (fun n => f (n + 1)) n := by
ext n
cases h : f (n + 1) <;> simp [h, _root_.pow_succ']
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_succ Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_succ
theorem summable_cantor_function (f : ℕ → Bool) (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) :
Summable (cantorFunctionAux c f) := by
apply (summable_geometric_of_lt_one h1 h2).summable_of_eq_zero_or_self
intro n; cases h : f n <;> simp [h]
#align cardinal.summable_cantor_function Cardinal.summable_cantor_function
def cantorFunction (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) : ℝ :=
∑' n, cantorFunctionAux c f n
#align cardinal.cantor_function Cardinal.cantorFunction
theorem cantorFunction_le (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) (h3 : ∀ n, f n → g n) :
cantorFunction c f ≤ cantorFunction c g := by
apply tsum_le_tsum _ (summable_cantor_function f h1 h2) (summable_cantor_function g h1 h2)
intro n; cases h : f n
· simp [h, cantorFunctionAux_nonneg h1]
replace h3 : g n = true := h3 n h; simp [h, h3]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_le Cardinal.cantorFunction_le
theorem cantorFunction_succ (f : ℕ → Bool) (h1 : 0 ≤ c) (h2 : c < 1) :
cantorFunction c f = cond (f 0) 1 0 + c * cantorFunction c fun n => f (n + 1) := by
rw [cantorFunction, tsum_eq_zero_add (summable_cantor_function f h1 h2)]
rw [cantorFunctionAux_succ, tsum_mul_left, cantorFunctionAux, _root_.pow_zero]
rfl
#align cardinal.cantor_function_succ Cardinal.cantorFunction_succ
theorem increasing_cantorFunction (h1 : 0 < c) (h2 : c < 1 / 2) {n : ℕ} {f g : ℕ → Bool}
(hn : ∀ k < n, f k = g k) (fn : f n = false) (gn : g n = true) :
cantorFunction c f < cantorFunction c g := by
have h3 : c < 1 := by
apply h2.trans
norm_num
induction' n with n ih generalizing f g
· let f_max : ℕ → Bool := fun n => Nat.rec false (fun _ _ => true) n
have hf_max : ∀ n, f n → f_max n := by
intro n hn
cases n
· rw [fn] at hn
contradiction
apply rfl
let g_min : ℕ → Bool := fun n => Nat.rec true (fun _ _ => false) n
have hg_min : ∀ n, g_min n → g n := by
intro n hn
cases n
· rw [gn]
simp at hn
apply (cantorFunction_le (le_of_lt h1) h3 hf_max).trans_lt
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (cantorFunction_le (le_of_lt h1) h3 hg_min)
have : c / (1 - c) < 1 := by
rw [div_lt_one, lt_sub_iff_add_lt]
· convert _root_.add_lt_add h2 h2
norm_num
rwa [sub_pos]
convert this
· rw [cantorFunction_succ _ (le_of_lt h1) h3, div_eq_mul_inv, ←
tsum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt h1) h3]
apply zero_add
· refine (tsum_eq_single 0 ?_).trans ?_
· intro n hn
cases n
· contradiction
rfl
· exact cantorFunctionAux_zero _
rw [cantorFunction_succ f (le_of_lt h1) h3, cantorFunction_succ g (le_of_lt h1) h3]
rw [hn 0 <| zero_lt_succ n]
apply add_lt_add_left
rw [mul_lt_mul_left h1]
exact ih (fun k hk => hn _ <| Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) fn gn
#align cardinal.increasing_cantor_function Cardinal.increasing_cantorFunction
theorem cantorFunction_injective (h1 : 0 < c) (h2 : c < 1 / 2) :
Function.Injective (cantorFunction c) := by
intro f g hfg
classical
by_contra h
revert hfg
have : ∃ n, f n ≠ g n := by
rw [← not_forall]
intro h'
apply h
ext
apply h'
let n := Nat.find this
have hn : ∀ k : ℕ, k < n → f k = g k := by
intro k hk
apply of_not_not
exact Nat.find_min this hk
cases fn : f n
· apply _root_.ne_of_lt
refine increasing_cantorFunction h1 h2 hn fn ?_
apply Bool.eq_true_of_not_eq_false
rw [← fn]
apply Ne.symm
exact Nat.find_spec this
· apply _root_.ne_of_gt
refine increasing_cantorFunction h1 h2 (fun k hk => (hn k hk).symm) ?_ fn
apply Bool.eq_false_of_not_eq_true
rw [← fn]
apply Ne.symm
exact Nat.find_spec this
#align cardinal.cantor_function_injective Cardinal.cantorFunction_injective
theorem mk_real : #ℝ = 𝔠 := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Real.equivCauchy.cardinal_eq]
apply mk_quotient_le.trans
apply (mk_subtype_le _).trans_eq
rw [← power_def, mk_nat, mkRat, aleph0_power_aleph0]
· convert mk_le_of_injective (cantorFunction_injective _ _)
· rw [← power_def, mk_bool, mk_nat, two_power_aleph0]
· exact 1 / 3
· norm_num
· norm_num
#align cardinal.mk_real Cardinal.mk_real
theorem mk_univ_real : #(Set.univ : Set ℝ) = 𝔠 := by rw [mk_univ, mk_real]
#align cardinal.mk_univ_real Cardinal.mk_univ_real
theorem not_countable_real : ¬(Set.univ : Set ℝ).Countable := by
rw [← le_aleph0_iff_set_countable, not_le, mk_univ_real]
apply cantor
#align cardinal.not_countable_real Cardinal.not_countable_real
theorem mk_Ioi_real (a : ℝ) : #(Ioi a) = 𝔠 := by
refine le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) ?_
rw [← not_lt]
intro h
refine _root_.ne_of_lt ?_ mk_univ_real
have hu : Iio a ∪ {a} ∪ Ioi a = Set.univ := by
convert @Iic_union_Ioi ℝ _ _
exact Iio_union_right
rw [← hu]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (mk_union_le _ _) ?_
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right (mk_union_le _ _) _) ?_
have h2 : (fun x => a + a - x) '' Ioi a = Iio a := by
convert @image_const_sub_Ioi ℝ _ _ _
simp
rw [← h2]
refine add_lt_of_lt (cantor _).le ?_ h
refine add_lt_of_lt (cantor _).le (mk_image_le.trans_lt h) ?_
rw [mk_singleton]
exact one_lt_aleph0.trans (cantor _)
#align cardinal.mk_Ioi_real Cardinal.mk_Ioi_real
theorem mk_Ici_real (a : ℝ) : #(Ici a) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Ioi_real a ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Ioi_subset_Ici_self)
#align cardinal.mk_Ici_real Cardinal.mk_Ici_real
theorem mk_Iio_real (a : ℝ) : #(Iio a) = 𝔠 := by
refine le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) ?_
have h2 : (fun x => a + a - x) '' Iio a = Ioi a := by
simp only [image_const_sub_Iio, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact mk_Ioi_real a ▸ h2 ▸ mk_image_le
#align cardinal.mk_Iio_real Cardinal.mk_Iio_real
theorem mk_Iic_real (a : ℝ) : #(Iic a) = 𝔠 :=
le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) (mk_Iio_real a ▸ mk_le_mk_of_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self)
#align cardinal.mk_Iic_real Cardinal.mk_Iic_real
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Cardinality.lean | 265 | 273 | theorem mk_Ioo_real {a b : ℝ} (h : a < b) : #(Ioo a b) = 𝔠 := by |
refine le_antisymm (mk_real ▸ mk_set_le _) ?_
have h1 : #((fun x => x - a) '' Ioo a b) ≤ #(Ioo a b) := mk_image_le
refine le_trans ?_ h1
rw [image_sub_const_Ioo, sub_self]
replace h := sub_pos_of_lt h
have h2 : #(Inv.inv '' Ioo 0 (b - a)) ≤ #(Ioo 0 (b - a)) := mk_image_le
refine le_trans ?_ h2
rw [image_inv, inv_Ioo_0_left h, mk_Ioi_real]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
#align_import analysis.calculus.bump_function_inner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
noncomputable section
open Function Filter Set Metric MeasureTheory FiniteDimensional Measure
open scoped Topology
namespace ContDiffBump
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [HasContDiffBump E]
[MeasurableSpace E] {c : E} (f : ContDiffBump c) {x : E} {n : ℕ∞} {μ : Measure E}
protected def normed (μ : Measure E) : E → ℝ := fun x => f x / ∫ x, f x ∂μ
#align cont_diff_bump.normed ContDiffBump.normed
theorem normed_def {μ : Measure E} (x : E) : f.normed μ x = f x / ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
rfl
#align cont_diff_bump.normed_def ContDiffBump.normed_def
theorem nonneg_normed (x : E) : 0 ≤ f.normed μ x :=
div_nonneg f.nonneg <| integral_nonneg f.nonneg'
#align cont_diff_bump.nonneg_normed ContDiffBump.nonneg_normed
theorem contDiff_normed {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiff ℝ n (f.normed μ) :=
f.contDiff.div_const _
#align cont_diff_bump.cont_diff_normed ContDiffBump.contDiff_normed
theorem continuous_normed : Continuous (f.normed μ) :=
f.continuous.div_const _
#align cont_diff_bump.continuous_normed ContDiffBump.continuous_normed
theorem normed_sub (x : E) : f.normed μ (c - x) = f.normed μ (c + x) := by
simp_rw [f.normed_def, f.sub]
#align cont_diff_bump.normed_sub ContDiffBump.normed_sub
theorem normed_neg (f : ContDiffBump (0 : E)) (x : E) : f.normed μ (-x) = f.normed μ x := by
simp_rw [f.normed_def, f.neg]
#align cont_diff_bump.normed_neg ContDiffBump.normed_neg
variable [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
protected theorem integrable : Integrable f μ :=
f.continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport f.hasCompactSupport
#align cont_diff_bump.integrable ContDiffBump.integrable
protected theorem integrable_normed : Integrable (f.normed μ) μ :=
f.integrable.div_const _
#align cont_diff_bump.integrable_normed ContDiffBump.integrable_normed
variable [μ.IsOpenPosMeasure]
theorem integral_pos : 0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
refine (integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg f.nonneg' f.integrable).mpr ?_
rw [f.support_eq]
exact measure_ball_pos μ c f.rOut_pos
#align cont_diff_bump.integral_pos ContDiffBump.integral_pos
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/BumpFunction/Normed.lean | 75 | 77 | theorem integral_normed : ∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1 := by |
simp_rw [ContDiffBump.normed, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm (f _), ← smul_eq_mul, integral_smul]
exact inv_mul_cancel f.integral_pos.ne'
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.intervals.disjoint from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort u} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
open Set
open OrderDual (toDual)
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioi b) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ha hb => (h.trans_lt hb).not_le ha
#align set.Iic_disjoint_Ioi Set.Iic_disjoint_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Iio_disjoint_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iio a) (Ici b) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ ha hb => (h.trans_lt' ha).not_le hb
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioi h).mono le_rfl Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
#align set.Iic_disjoint_Ioc Set.Iic_disjoint_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc b c) :=
(Iic_disjoint_Ioc le_rfl).mono Ioc_subset_Iic_self le_rfl
#align set.Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same Set.Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_same
@[simp]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_same : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.mpr fun _ hab hbc => hab.2.not_le hbc.1
#align set.Ico_disjoint_Ico_same Set.Ico_disjoint_Ico_same
@[simp]
theorem Ici_disjoint_Iic : Disjoint (Ici a) (Iic b) ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, Ici_inter_Iic, Icc_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.Ici_disjoint_Iic Set.Ici_disjoint_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ici : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ici b) ↔ ¬b ≤ a :=
disjoint_comm.trans Ici_disjoint_Iic
#align set.Iic_disjoint_Ici Set.Iic_disjoint_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioi (h : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioi c) :=
disjoint_left.mpr (fun _ hx hy ↦ (hx.2.trans h).not_lt hy)
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioi_same : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioi b) :=
Ioc_disjoint_Ioi le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iic : ⋃ a : α, Iic a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ⟨x, right_mem_Iic⟩
#align set.Union_Iic Set.iUnion_Iic
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ici : ⋃ a : α, Ici a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x => ⟨x, left_mem_Ici⟩
#align set.Union_Ici Set.iUnion_Ici
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_right (a : α) : ⋃ b, Icc a b = Ici a := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic, inter_univ]
#align set.Union_Icc_right Set.iUnion_Icc_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_right (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ioc a b = Ioi a := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iic, inter_univ]
#align set.Union_Ioc_right Set.iUnion_Ioc_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Icc_left (b : α) : ⋃ a, Icc a b = Iic b := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ici, univ_inter]
#align set.Union_Icc_left Set.iUnion_Icc_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_left (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ico a b = Iio b := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ici, univ_inter]
#align set.Union_Ico_left Set.iUnion_Ico_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Iio [NoMaxOrder α] : ⋃ a : α, Iio a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 exists_gt
#align set.Union_Iio Set.iUnion_Iio
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioi [NoMinOrder α] : ⋃ a : α, Ioi a = univ :=
iUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 exists_lt
#align set.Union_Ioi Set.iUnion_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ico_right [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ico a b = Ici a := by
simp only [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio, inter_univ]
#align set.Union_Ico_right Set.iUnion_Ico_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioo_right [NoMaxOrder α] (a : α) : ⋃ b, Ioo a b = Ioi a := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← inter_iUnion, iUnion_Iio, inter_univ]
#align set.Union_Ioo_right Set.iUnion_Ioo_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_Ioc_left [NoMinOrder α] (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ioc a b = Iic b := by
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ioi, univ_inter]
#align set.Union_Ioc_left Set.iUnion_Ioc_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Disjoint.lean | 132 | 133 | theorem iUnion_Ioo_left [NoMinOrder α] (b : α) : ⋃ a, Ioo a b = Iio b := by |
simp only [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← iUnion_inter, iUnion_Ioi, univ_inter]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
#align_import logic.equiv.fintype from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9407b03373c8cd201df99d6bc5514fc2db44054f"
section Fintype
variable {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq β] (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : α ↪ β)
def Function.Embedding.toEquivRange : α ≃ Set.range f :=
⟨fun a => ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩, f.invOfMemRange, fun _ => by simp, fun _ => by simp⟩
#align function.embedding.to_equiv_range Function.Embedding.toEquivRange
@[simp]
theorem Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_apply (a : α) :
f.toEquivRange a = ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩ :=
rfl
#align function.embedding.to_equiv_range_apply Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Fintype.lean | 50 | 51 | theorem Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_symm_apply_self (a : α) :
f.toEquivRange.symm ⟨f a, Set.mem_range_self a⟩ = a := by | simp [Equiv.symm_apply_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.ring.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"76de8ae01554c3b37d66544866659ff174e66e1f"
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {R : Type x}
open Function
class Distrib (R : Type*) extends Mul R, Add R where
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align distrib Distrib
class LeftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
#align left_distrib_class LeftDistribClass
class RightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align right_distrib_class RightDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.leftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] : LeftDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.left_distrib⟩
#align distrib.left_distrib_class Distrib.leftDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.rightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] :
RightDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.right_distrib⟩
#align distrib.right_distrib_class Distrib.rightDistribClass
theorem left_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
LeftDistribClass.left_distrib a b c
#align left_distrib left_distrib
alias mul_add := left_distrib
#align mul_add mul_add
theorem right_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
(a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
RightDistribClass.right_distrib a b c
#align right_distrib right_distrib
alias add_mul := right_distrib
#align add_mul add_mul
theorem distrib_three_right [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c d : R) :
(a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d := by simp [right_distrib]
#align distrib_three_right distrib_three_right
class NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends AddCommMonoid α, Distrib α, MulZeroClass α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_semiring NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
class NonUnitalSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, SemigroupWithZero α
#align non_unital_semiring NonUnitalSemiring
class NonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, MulZeroOneClass α,
AddCommMonoidWithOne α
#align non_assoc_semiring NonAssocSemiring
class NonUnitalNonAssocRing (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_ring NonUnitalNonAssocRing
class NonUnitalRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonUnitalSemiring α
#align non_unital_ring NonUnitalRing
class NonAssocRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonAssocSemiring α,
AddCommGroupWithOne α
#align non_assoc_ring NonAssocRing
class Semiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalSemiring α, NonAssocSemiring α, MonoidWithZero α
#align semiring Semiring
class Ring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, AddCommGroup R, AddGroupWithOne R
#align ring Ring
section DistribMulOneClass
variable [Add α] [MulOneClass α]
theorem add_one_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (a + 1) * b = a * b + b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align add_one_mul add_one_mul
theorem mul_add_one [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a := by
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
#align mul_add_one mul_add_one
theorem one_add_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (1 + a) * b = b + a * b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align one_add_mul one_add_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean | 168 | 169 | theorem mul_one_add [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (1 + b) = a + a * b := by |
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [MeasurableSpace M]
@[to_additive conv "Additive convolution of measures."]
noncomputable def mconv (μ : Measure M) (ν : Measure M) :
Measure M := Measure.map (fun x : M × M ↦ x.1 * x.2) (μ.prod ν)
scoped[MeasureTheory] infix:80 " ∗ " => MeasureTheory.Measure.mconv
scoped[MeasureTheory] infix:80 " ∗ " => MeasureTheory.Measure.conv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dirac_one_mconv [MeasurableMul₂ M] (μ : Measure M) [SFinite μ] :
(Measure.dirac 1) ∗ μ = μ := by
unfold mconv
rw [MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac_prod, map_map]
· simp only [Function.comp_def, one_mul, map_id']
all_goals { measurability }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mconv_dirac_one [MeasurableMul₂ M]
(μ : Measure M) [SFinite μ] : μ ∗ (Measure.dirac 1) = μ := by
unfold mconv
rw [MeasureTheory.Measure.prod_dirac, map_map]
· simp only [Function.comp_def, mul_one, map_id']
all_goals { measurability }
@[to_additive (attr := simp) conv_zero]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Convolution.lean | 59 | 61 | theorem mconv_zero (μ : Measure M) : (0 : Measure M) ∗ μ = (0 : Measure M) := by |
unfold mconv
simp
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.DotProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
#align_import data.matrix.rank from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"17219820a8aa8abe85adf5dfde19af1dd1bd8ae7"
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
open FiniteDimensional
variable {l m n o R : Type*} [Fintype n] [Fintype o]
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R]
noncomputable def rank (A : Matrix m n R) : ℕ :=
finrank R <| LinearMap.range A.mulVecLin
#align matrix.rank Matrix.rank
@[simp]
theorem rank_one [StrongRankCondition R] [DecidableEq n] :
rank (1 : Matrix n n R) = Fintype.card n := by
rw [rank, mulVecLin_one, LinearMap.range_id, finrank_top, finrank_pi]
#align matrix.rank_one Matrix.rank_one
@[simp]
theorem rank_zero [Nontrivial R] : rank (0 : Matrix m n R) = 0 := by
rw [rank, mulVecLin_zero, LinearMap.range_zero, finrank_bot]
#align matrix.rank_zero Matrix.rank_zero
theorem rank_le_card_width [StrongRankCondition R] (A : Matrix m n R) :
A.rank ≤ Fintype.card n := by
haveI : Module.Finite R (n → R) := Module.Finite.pi
haveI : Module.Free R (n → R) := Module.Free.pi _ _
exact A.mulVecLin.finrank_range_le.trans_eq (finrank_pi _)
#align matrix.rank_le_card_width Matrix.rank_le_card_width
theorem rank_le_width [StrongRankCondition R] {m n : ℕ} (A : Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) R) :
A.rank ≤ n :=
A.rank_le_card_width.trans <| (Fintype.card_fin n).le
#align matrix.rank_le_width Matrix.rank_le_width
theorem rank_mul_le_left [StrongRankCondition R] (A : Matrix m n R) (B : Matrix n o R) :
(A * B).rank ≤ A.rank := by
rw [rank, rank, mulVecLin_mul]
exact Cardinal.toNat_le_toNat (LinearMap.rank_comp_le_left _ _) (rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
#align matrix.rank_mul_le_left Matrix.rank_mul_le_left
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Rank.lean | 77 | 81 | theorem rank_mul_le_right [StrongRankCondition R] (A : Matrix m n R) (B : Matrix n o R) :
(A * B).rank ≤ B.rank := by |
rw [rank, rank, mulVecLin_mul]
exact finrank_le_finrank_of_rank_le_rank (LinearMap.lift_rank_comp_le_right _ _)
(rank_lt_aleph0 _ _)
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
#align_import measure_theory.pi_system from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
open MeasurableSpace Set
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory
def IsPiSystem {α} (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∀ᵉ (s ∈ C) (t ∈ C), (s ∩ t : Set α).Nonempty → s ∩ t ∈ C
#align is_pi_system IsPiSystem
theorem IsPiSystem.singleton {α} (S : Set α) : IsPiSystem ({S} : Set (Set α)) := by
intro s h_s t h_t _
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_s, Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_t, Set.inter_self,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
#align is_pi_system.singleton IsPiSystem.singleton
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_empty {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert ∅ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
cases' hs with hs hs
· simp [hs]
· cases' ht with ht ht
· simp [ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
#align is_pi_system.insert_empty IsPiSystem.insert_empty
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_univ {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert Set.univ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
cases' hs with hs hs
· cases' ht with ht ht <;> simp [hs, ht]
· cases' ht with ht ht
· simp [hs, ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
#align is_pi_system.insert_univ IsPiSystem.insert_univ
theorem IsPiSystem.comap {α β} {S : Set (Set β)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) (f : α → β) :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | ∃ t ∈ S, f ⁻¹' t = s } := by
rintro _ ⟨s, hs_mem, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, ht_mem, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← Set.preimage_inter] at hst ⊢
exact ⟨s ∩ t, h_pi s hs_mem t ht_mem (nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hst), rfl⟩
#align is_pi_system.comap IsPiSystem.comap
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le {α ι} (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) p) :
IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) := by
intro t1 ht1 t2 ht2 h
rw [Set.mem_iUnion] at ht1 ht2 ⊢
cases' ht1 with n ht1
cases' ht2 with m ht2
obtain ⟨k, hpnk, hpmk⟩ : ∃ k, p n ≤ p k ∧ p m ≤ p k := hp_directed n m
exact ⟨k, hp_pi k t1 (hpnk ht1) t2 (hpmk ht2) h⟩
#align is_pi_system_Union_of_directed_le isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone {α ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_mono : Monotone p) : IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) :=
isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le p hp_pi (Monotone.directed_le hp_mono)
#align is_pi_system_Union_of_monotone isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone
inductive generatePiSystem {α} (S : Set (Set α)) : Set (Set α)
| base {s : Set α} (h_s : s ∈ S) : generatePiSystem S s
| inter {s t : Set α} (h_s : generatePiSystem S s) (h_t : generatePiSystem S t)
(h_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : generatePiSystem S (s ∩ t)
#align generate_pi_system generatePiSystem
theorem isPiSystem_generatePiSystem {α} (S : Set (Set α)) : IsPiSystem (generatePiSystem S) :=
fun _ h_s _ h_t h_nonempty => generatePiSystem.inter h_s h_t h_nonempty
#align is_pi_system_generate_pi_system isPiSystem_generatePiSystem
theorem subset_generatePiSystem_self {α} (S : Set (Set α)) : S ⊆ generatePiSystem S := fun _ =>
generatePiSystem.base
#align subset_generate_pi_system_self subset_generatePiSystem_self
theorem generatePiSystem_subset_self {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_S : IsPiSystem S) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ S := fun x h => by
induction' h with _ h_s s u _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u
· exact h_s
· exact h_S _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
#align generate_pi_system_subset_self generatePiSystem_subset_self
theorem generatePiSystem_eq {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) : generatePiSystem S = S :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (generatePiSystem_subset_self h_pi) (subset_generatePiSystem_self S)
#align generate_pi_system_eq generatePiSystem_eq
theorem generatePiSystem_mono {α} {S T : Set (Set α)} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ generatePiSystem T := fun t ht => by
induction' ht with s h_s s u _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u
· exact generatePiSystem.base (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hST h_s)
· exact isPiSystem_generatePiSystem T _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
#align generate_pi_system_mono generatePiSystem_mono
theorem generatePiSystem_measurableSet {α} [M : MeasurableSpace α] {S : Set (Set α)}
(h_meas_S : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) (h_in_pi : t ∈ generatePiSystem S) :
MeasurableSet t := by
induction' h_in_pi with s h_s s u _ _ _ h_s h_u
· apply h_meas_S _ h_s
· apply MeasurableSet.inter h_s h_u
#align generate_pi_system_measurable_set generatePiSystem_measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem {α} {g : Set (Set α)} (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ generatePiSystem g) : MeasurableSet[generateFrom g] t :=
@generatePiSystem_measurableSet α (generateFrom g) g
(fun _ h_s_in_g => measurableSet_generateFrom h_s_in_g) t ht
#align generate_from_measurable_set_of_generate_pi_system generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem
theorem generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq {α} {g : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (generatePiSystem g) = generateFrom g := by
apply le_antisymm <;> apply generateFrom_le
· exact fun t h_t => generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem t h_t
· exact fun t h_t => measurableSet_generateFrom (generatePiSystem.base h_t)
#align generate_from_generate_pi_system_eq generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} (h_pi : ∀ b, IsPiSystem (g b))
(t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
induction' h_t with s h_s s t' h_gen_s h_gen_t' h_nonempty h_s h_t'
· rcases h_s with ⟨t', ⟨⟨b, rfl⟩, h_s_in_t'⟩⟩
refine ⟨{b}, fun _ => s, ?_⟩
simpa using h_s_in_t'
· rcases h_t' with ⟨T_t', ⟨f_t', ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
rcases h_s with ⟨T_s, ⟨f_s, ⟨rfl, h_s⟩⟩⟩
use T_s ∪ T_t', fun b : β =>
if b ∈ T_s then if b ∈ T_t' then f_s b ∩ f_t' b else f_s b
else if b ∈ T_t' then f_t' b else (∅ : Set α)
constructor
· ext a
simp_rw [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, Finset.mem_union, or_imp]
rw [← forall_and]
constructor <;> intro h1 b <;> by_cases hbs : b ∈ T_s <;> by_cases hbt : b ∈ T_t' <;>
specialize h1 b <;>
simp only [hbs, hbt, if_true, if_false, true_imp_iff, and_self_iff, false_imp_iff,
and_true_iff, true_and_iff] at h1 ⊢
all_goals exact h1
intro b h_b
split_ifs with hbs hbt hbt
· refine h_pi b (f_s b) (h_s b hbs) (f_t' b) (h_t' b hbt) (Set.Nonempty.mono ?_ h_nonempty)
exact Set.inter_subset_inter (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbs) (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbt)
· exact h_s b hbs
· exact h_t' b hbt
· rw [Finset.mem_union] at h_b
apply False.elim (h_b.elim hbs hbt)
#align mem_generate_pi_system_Union_elim mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim' {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} {s : Set β}
(h_pi : ∀ b ∈ s, IsPiSystem (g b)) (t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b ∈ s, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), ↑T ⊆ s ∧ (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
have : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b) := by
suffices h1 : ⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b = ⋃ b ∈ s, g b by rwa [h1]
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
rfl
rcases @mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim α (Subtype s) (g ∘ Subtype.val)
(fun b => h_pi b.val b.property) t this with
⟨T, ⟨f, ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
refine
⟨T.image (fun x : s => (x : β)),
Function.extend (fun x : s => (x : β)) f fun _ : β => (∅ : Set α), by simp, ?_, ?_⟩
· ext a
constructor <;>
· simp (config := { proj := false }) only
[Set.mem_iInter, Subtype.forall, Finset.set_biInter_finset_image]
intro h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
have h2 := h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
revert h2
rw [Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply id
· intros b h_b
simp_rw [Finset.mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
at h_b
cases' h_b with h_b_w h_b_h
have h_b_alt : b = (Subtype.mk b h_b_w).val := rfl
rw [h_b_alt, Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply h_t'
apply h_b_h
#align mem_generate_pi_system_Union_elim' mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'
section UnionInter
variable {α ι : Type*}
def piiUnionInter (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (S : Set ι) : Set (Set α) :=
{ s : Set α |
∃ (t : Finset ι) (_ : ↑t ⊆ S) (f : ι → Set α) (_ : ∀ x, x ∈ t → f x ∈ π x), s = ⋂ x ∈ t, f x }
#align pi_Union_Inter piiUnionInter
theorem piiUnionInter_singleton (π : ι → Set (Set α)) (i : ι) :
piiUnionInter π {i} = π i ∪ {univ} := by
ext1 s
simp only [piiUnionInter, exists_prop, mem_union]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨t, hti, f, hfπ, rfl⟩
simp only [subset_singleton_iff, Finset.mem_coe] at hti
by_cases hi : i ∈ t
· have ht_eq_i : t = {i} := by
ext1 x
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun h => hti x h, fun h => h.symm ▸ hi⟩
simp only [ht_eq_i, Finset.mem_singleton, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
exact Or.inl (hfπ i hi)
· have ht_empty : t = ∅ := by
ext1 x
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iff_false_iff]
exact fun hx => hi (hti x hx ▸ hx)
-- Porting note: `Finset.not_mem_empty` required
simp [ht_empty, Finset.not_mem_empty, iInter_false, iInter_univ, Set.mem_singleton univ,
or_true_iff]
· cases' h with hs hs
· refine ⟨{i}, ?_, fun _ => s, ⟨fun x hx => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [Finset.coe_singleton]
· rw [Finset.mem_singleton] at hx
rwa [hx]
· simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
· refine ⟨∅, ?_⟩
simpa only [Finset.coe_empty, subset_singleton_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, IsEmpty.forall_iff,
imp_true_iff, Finset.not_mem_empty, iInter_false, iInter_univ, true_and_iff,
exists_const] using hs
#align pi_Union_Inter_singleton piiUnionInter_singleton
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/PiSystem.lean | 395 | 405 | theorem piiUnionInter_singleton_left (s : ι → Set α) (S : Set ι) :
piiUnionInter (fun i => ({s i} : Set (Set α))) S =
{ s' : Set α | ∃ (t : Finset ι) (_ : ↑t ⊆ S), s' = ⋂ i ∈ t, s i } := by |
ext1 s'
simp_rw [piiUnionInter, Set.mem_singleton_iff, exists_prop, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨t, htS, h_eq⟩ => ⟨t, htS, s, fun _ _ => rfl, h_eq⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, htS, f, hft_eq, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨t, htS, ?_⟩
congr! 3
apply hft_eq
assumption
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
#align_import data.set.n_ary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5e526d18cea33550268dcbbddcb822d5cde40654"
open Function
namespace Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*} {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
variable {s s' : Set α} {t t' : Set β} {u u' : Set γ} {v : Set δ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c c' : γ}
{d d' : δ}
theorem mem_image2_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image2 f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨a', ha', b', hb', h⟩
rcases hf h with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨ha', hb'⟩, fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
#align set.mem_image2_iff Set.mem_image2_iff
theorem image2_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t' := by
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
exact mem_image2_of_mem (hs ha) (ht hb)
#align set.image2_subset Set.image2_subset
theorem image2_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s t' :=
image2_subset Subset.rfl ht
#align set.image2_subset_left Set.image2_subset_left
theorem image2_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image2 f s t ⊆ image2 f s' t :=
image2_subset hs Subset.rfl
#align set.image2_subset_right Set.image2_subset_right
theorem image_subset_image2_left (hb : b ∈ t) : (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ ha => mem_image2_of_mem ha hb
#align set.image_subset_image2_left Set.image_subset_image2_left
theorem image_subset_image2_right (ha : a ∈ s) : f a '' t ⊆ image2 f s t :=
forall_mem_image.2 fun _ => mem_image2_of_mem ha
#align set.image_subset_image2_right Set.image_subset_image2_right
theorem forall_image2_iff {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image2 f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) :=
⟨fun h x hx y hy => h _ ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ h x hx y hy⟩
#align set.forall_image2_iff Set.forall_image2_iff
@[simp]
theorem image2_subset_iff {u : Set γ} : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_image2_iff
#align set.image2_subset_iff Set.image2_subset_iff
theorem image2_subset_iff_left : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (fun b => f a b) '' t ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage]
#align set.image2_subset_iff_left Set.image2_subset_iff_left
theorem image2_subset_iff_right : image2 f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (fun a => f a b) '' s ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, subset_def, mem_preimage, @forall₂_swap α]
#align set.image2_subset_iff_right Set.image2_subset_iff_right
variable (f)
-- Porting note: Removing `simp` - LHS does not simplify
lemma image_prod : (fun x : α × β ↦ f x.1 x.2) '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
ext fun _ ↦ by simp [and_assoc]
#align set.image_prod Set.image_prod
@[simp] lemma image_uncurry_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : uncurry f '' s ×ˢ t = image2 f s t :=
image_prod _
#align set.image_uncurry_prod Set.image_uncurry_prod
@[simp] lemma image2_mk_eq_prod : image2 Prod.mk s t = s ×ˢ t := ext <| by simp
#align set.image2_mk_eq_prod Set.image2_mk_eq_prod
-- Porting note: Removing `simp` - LHS does not simplify
lemma image2_curry (f : α × β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 (fun a b ↦ f (a, b)) s t = f '' s ×ˢ t := by
simp [← image_uncurry_prod, uncurry]
#align set.image2_curry Set.image2_curry
theorem image2_swap (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => f b a) t s := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨b, hb, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align set.image2_swap Set.image2_swap
variable {f}
theorem image2_union_left : image2 f (s ∪ s') t = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_prod, union_prod, image_union]
#align set.image2_union_left Set.image2_union_left
theorem image2_union_right : image2 f s (t ∪ t') = image2 f s t ∪ image2 f s t' := by
rw [← image2_swap, image2_union_left, image2_swap f, image2_swap f]
#align set.image2_union_right Set.image2_union_right
lemma image2_inter_left (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f (s ∩ s') t = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, inter_prod, image_inter hf.uncurry]
#align set.image2_inter_left Set.image2_inter_left
lemma image2_inter_right (hf : Injective2 f) :
image2 f s (t ∩ t') = image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' := by
simp_rw [← image_uncurry_prod, prod_inter, image_inter hf.uncurry]
#align set.image2_inter_right Set.image2_inter_right
@[simp]
theorem image2_empty_left : image2 f ∅ t = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.image2_empty_left Set.image2_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem image2_empty_right : image2 f s ∅ = ∅ :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.image2_empty_right Set.image2_empty_right
theorem Nonempty.image2 : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (image2 f s t).Nonempty :=
fun ⟨_, ha⟩ ⟨_, hb⟩ => ⟨_, mem_image2_of_mem ha hb⟩
#align set.nonempty.image2 Set.Nonempty.image2
@[simp]
theorem image2_nonempty_iff : (image2 f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_, a, ha, b, hb, _⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, b, hb⟩, fun h => h.1.image2 h.2⟩
#align set.image2_nonempty_iff Set.image2_nonempty_iff
theorem Nonempty.of_image2_left (h : (Set.image2 f s t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image2_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
#align set.nonempty.of_image2_left Set.Nonempty.of_image2_left
theorem Nonempty.of_image2_right (h : (Set.image2 f s t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image2_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
#align set.nonempty.of_image2_right Set.Nonempty.of_image2_right
@[simp]
theorem image2_eq_empty_iff : image2 f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image2_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
simp [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
#align set.image2_eq_empty_iff Set.image2_eq_empty_iff
theorem Subsingleton.image2 (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) (f : α → β → γ) :
(image2 f s t).Subsingleton := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply (hs.prod ht).image
theorem image2_inter_subset_left : image2 f (s ∩ s') t ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s' t :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ image2_subset_right) s s'
#align set.image2_inter_subset_left Set.image2_inter_subset_left
theorem image2_inter_subset_right : image2 f s (t ∩ t') ⊆ image2 f s t ∩ image2 f s t' :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ image2_subset_left) t t'
#align set.image2_inter_subset_right Set.image2_inter_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem image2_singleton_left : image2 f {a} t = f a '' t :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.image2_singleton_left Set.image2_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem image2_singleton_right : image2 f s {b} = (fun a => f a b) '' s :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.image2_singleton_right Set.image2_singleton_right
theorem image2_singleton : image2 f {a} {b} = {f a b} := by simp
#align set.image2_singleton Set.image2_singleton
@[simp]
theorem image2_insert_left : image2 f (insert a s) t = (fun b => f a b) '' t ∪ image2 f s t := by
rw [insert_eq, image2_union_left, image2_singleton_left]
#align set.image2_insert_left Set.image2_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem image2_insert_right : image2 f s (insert b t) = (fun a => f a b) '' s ∪ image2 f s t := by
rw [insert_eq, image2_union_right, image2_singleton_right]
#align set.image2_insert_right Set.image2_insert_right
@[congr]
theorem image2_congr (h : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t := by
ext
constructor <;> rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ <;> exact ⟨a, ha, b, hb, by rw [h a ha b hb]⟩
#align set.image2_congr Set.image2_congr
theorem image2_congr' (h : ∀ a b, f a b = f' a b) : image2 f s t = image2 f' s t :=
image2_congr fun a _ b _ => h a b
#align set.image2_congr' Set.image2_congr'
#noalign set.image3
#noalign set.mem_image3
#noalign set.image3_mono
#noalign set.image3_congr
#noalign set.image3_congr'
#noalign set.image2_image2_left
#noalign set.image2_image2_right
theorem image_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (g : γ → δ) :
g '' image2 f s t = image2 (fun a b => g (f a b)) s t := by
simp only [← image_prod, image_image]
#align set.image_image2 Set.image_image2
theorem image2_image_left (f : γ → β → δ) (g : α → γ) :
image2 f (g '' s) t = image2 (fun a b => f (g a) b) s t := by
ext; simp
#align set.image2_image_left Set.image2_image_left
theorem image2_image_right (f : α → γ → δ) (g : β → γ) :
image2 f s (g '' t) = image2 (fun a b => f a (g b)) s t := by
ext; simp
#align set.image2_image_right Set.image2_image_right
@[simp]
theorem image2_left (h : t.Nonempty) : image2 (fun x _ => x) s t = s := by
simp [nonempty_def.mp h, ext_iff]
#align set.image2_left Set.image2_left
@[simp]
theorem image2_right (h : s.Nonempty) : image2 (fun _ y => y) s t = t := by
simp [nonempty_def.mp h, ext_iff]
#align set.image2_right Set.image2_right
lemma image2_range (f : α' → β' → γ) (g : α → α') (h : β → β') :
image2 f (range g) (range h) = range fun x : α × β ↦ f (g x.1) (h x.2) := by
simp_rw [← image_univ, image2_image_left, image2_image_right, ← image_prod, univ_prod_univ]
theorem image2_assoc {f : δ → γ → ε} {g : α → β → δ} {f' : α → ε' → ε} {g' : β → γ → ε'}
(h_assoc : ∀ a b c, f (g a b) c = f' a (g' b c)) :
image2 f (image2 g s t) u = image2 f' s (image2 g' t u) :=
eq_of_forall_subset_iff fun _ ↦ by simp only [image2_subset_iff, forall_image2_iff, h_assoc]
#align set.image2_assoc Set.image2_assoc
theorem image2_comm {g : β → α → γ} (h_comm : ∀ a b, f a b = g b a) : image2 f s t = image2 g t s :=
(image2_swap _ _ _).trans <| by simp_rw [h_comm]
#align set.image2_comm Set.image2_comm
| Mathlib/Data/Set/NAry.lean | 248 | 252 | theorem image2_left_comm {f : α → δ → ε} {g : β → γ → δ} {f' : α → γ → δ'} {g' : β → δ' → ε}
(h_left_comm : ∀ a b c, f a (g b c) = g' b (f' a c)) :
image2 f s (image2 g t u) = image2 g' t (image2 f' s u) := by |
rw [image2_swap f', image2_swap f]
exact image2_assoc fun _ _ _ => h_left_comm _ _ _
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentialImage
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Slice
#align_import category_theory.equivalence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9aba7801eeecebb61f58a5763c2b6dd1b47dc6ef"
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor NatIso Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
@[ext]
structure Equivalence (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] where mk' ::
functor : C ⥤ D
inverse : D ⥤ C
unitIso : 𝟭 C ≅ functor ⋙ inverse
counitIso : inverse ⋙ functor ≅ 𝟭 D
functor_unitIso_comp :
∀ X : C, functor.map (unitIso.hom.app X) ≫ counitIso.hom.app (functor.obj X) =
𝟙 (functor.obj X) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_iso_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unitIso_comp
infixr:10 " ≌ " => Equivalence
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Equivalence
abbrev unit (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 C ⟶ e.functor ⋙ e.inverse :=
e.unitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit
abbrev counit (e : C ≌ D) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⟶ 𝟭 D :=
e.counitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit
abbrev unitInv (e : C ≌ D) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
e.unitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv
abbrev counitInv (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 D ⟶ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor :=
e.counitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unit = unit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counit = counit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unitInv = unit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counitInv = counit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counitInv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem functor_unit_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) ≫ e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) :=
e.functor_unitIso_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unit_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counitInv_functor_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) ≫ e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X) ≪≫ e.counitIso.app (e.functor.obj X))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.functor_unit_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_functor_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_functor_comp
theorem counitInv_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.counitIso.app _), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_app_functor
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Equivalence.lean | 173 | 176 | theorem counit_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by |
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X)), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Shift
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.IteratedDeriv.Defs
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
{R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 R F] [ContinuousConstSMul R F]
{n : ℕ} {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) {f g : 𝕜 → F}
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_add (hf : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n g s) :
iteratedDerivWithin n (f + g) s x =
iteratedDerivWithin n f s x + iteratedDerivWithin n g s x := by
simp_rw [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin_add_apply hf hg h hx,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.add_apply]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_congr (hfg : Set.EqOn f g s) :
Set.EqOn (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) (iteratedDerivWithin n g s) s := by
induction n generalizing f g with
| zero => rwa [iteratedDerivWithin_zero]
| succ n IH =>
intro y hy
have : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s y := h.uniqueDiffWithinAt hy
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_succ this, iteratedDerivWithin_succ this]
exact derivWithin_congr (IH hfg) (IH hfg hy)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/IteratedDeriv/Lemmas.lean | 40 | 46 | theorem iteratedDerivWithin_const_add (hn : 0 < n) (c : F) :
iteratedDerivWithin n (fun z => c + f z) s x = iteratedDerivWithin n f s x := by |
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := n.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne'
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_succ' h hx, iteratedDerivWithin_succ' h hx]
refine iteratedDerivWithin_congr h ?_ hx
intro y hy
exact derivWithin_const_add (h.uniqueDiffWithinAt hy) _
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
#align_import data.polynomial.expand from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
universe u v w
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (p q : ℕ)
noncomputable def expand : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ (eval₂RingHom C (X ^ p) : R[X] →+* R[X]) with commutes' := fun _ => eval₂_C _ _ }
#align polynomial.expand Polynomial.expand
theorem coe_expand : (expand R p : R[X] → R[X]) = eval₂ C (X ^ p) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_expand Polynomial.coe_expand
variable {R}
theorem expand_eq_comp_X_pow {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.comp (X ^ p) := rfl
theorem expand_eq_sum {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.sum fun e a => C a * (X ^ p) ^ e := by
simp [expand, eval₂]
#align polynomial.expand_eq_sum Polynomial.expand_eq_sum
@[simp]
theorem expand_C (r : R) : expand R p (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_C Polynomial.expand_C
@[simp]
theorem expand_X : expand R p X = X ^ p :=
eval₂_X _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_X Polynomial.expand_X
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (r : R) : expand R p (monomial q r) = monomial (q * p) r := by
simp_rw [← smul_X_eq_monomial, AlgHom.map_smul, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, mul_comm, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_monomial Polynomial.expand_monomial
theorem expand_expand (f : R[X]) : expand R p (expand R q f) = expand R (p * q) f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by simp_rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by simp_rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
simp_rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_expand Polynomial.expand_expand
theorem expand_mul (f : R[X]) : expand R (p * q) f = expand R p (expand R q f) :=
(expand_expand p q f).symm
#align polynomial.expand_mul Polynomial.expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem expand_zero (f : R[X]) : expand R 0 f = C (eval 1 f) := by simp [expand]
#align polynomial.expand_zero Polynomial.expand_zero
@[simp]
theorem expand_one (f : R[X]) : expand R 1 f = f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_one]
#align polynomial.expand_one Polynomial.expand_one
theorem expand_pow (f : R[X]) : expand R (p ^ q) f = (expand R p)^[q] f :=
Nat.recOn q (by rw [pow_zero, expand_one, Function.iterate_zero, id]) fun n ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', pow_succ', expand_mul, ih]
#align polynomial.expand_pow Polynomial.expand_pow
theorem derivative_expand (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.derivative (expand R p f) =
expand R p (Polynomial.derivative f) * (p * (X ^ (p - 1) : R[X])) := by
rw [coe_expand, derivative_eval₂_C, derivative_pow, C_eq_natCast, derivative_X, mul_one]
#align polynomial.derivative_expand Polynomial.derivative_expand
theorem coeff_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff n = if p ∣ n then f.coeff (n / p) else 0 := by
simp only [expand_eq_sum]
simp_rw [coeff_sum, ← pow_mul, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial, sum]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (n / p), Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ hb2
rw [if_neg]
intro hb3
apply hb2
rw [← hb3, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left b hp]
· intro hn
rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hn]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro k _
rw [if_neg]
exact fun hkn => h ⟨k, hkn.symm⟩
#align polynomial.coeff_expand Polynomial.coeff_expand
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (n * p) = f.coeff n := by
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_mul_left _ _), Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Expand.lean | 127 | 128 | theorem coeff_expand_mul' {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (p * n) = f.coeff n := by | rw [mul_comm, coeff_expand_mul hp]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_mod self_sub_toIocMod
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_to_Ico_div_zsmul toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_to_Ioc_div_zsmul toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ico_mod toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_to_Ioc_mod toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
#align to_Ico_mod_eq_iff toIcoMod_eq_iff
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
#align to_Ioc_mod_eq_iff toIocMod_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_left toIcoDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_left toIocDiv_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_left toIcoMod_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_left toIocMod_apply_left
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ico_div_apply_right toIcoDiv_apply_right
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
#align to_Ioc_div_apply_right toIocDiv_apply_right
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
#align to_Ico_mod_apply_right toIcoMod_apply_right
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
#align to_Ioc_mod_apply_right toIocMod_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul toIcoDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_div_add_zsmul' toIcoDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul toIocDiv_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_div_add_zsmul' toIocDiv_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_add toIcoDiv_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_add toIocDiv_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_zsmul' toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul toIocDiv_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_zsmul' toIocDiv_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right toIcoDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_add_right' toIcoDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right toIocDiv_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_add_right' toIocDiv_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ico_div_add_left toIcoDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ico_div_add_left' toIcoDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left toIocDiv_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
#align to_Ioc_div_add_left' toIocDiv_add_left'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub toIcoDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_div_sub' toIcoDiv_sub'
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub toIocDiv_sub
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_div_sub' toIocDiv_sub'
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ico_div_sub_eq_to_Ico_div_add' toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add'
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align to_Ioc_div_sub_eq_to_Ioc_div_add' toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add'
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
#align to_Ico_div_neg toIcoDiv_neg
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ico_div_neg' toIcoDiv_neg'
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align to_Ioc_div_neg toIocDiv_neg
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
#align to_Ioc_div_neg' toIocDiv_neg'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul toIcoMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_zsmul' toIcoMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul toIocMod_add_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_zsmul' toIocMod_add_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add toIcoMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_zsmul_add' toIcoMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (m • p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zsmul_add toIocMod_zsmul_add
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_zsmul_add' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (m • p + a) b = m • p + toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_zsmul', add_comm]
#align to_Ioc_mod_zsmul_add' toIocMod_zsmul_add'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_zsmul toIcoMod_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoMod_add_zsmul']
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_zsmul' toIcoMod_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b - m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_zsmul toIocMod_sub_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a - m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b - m • p := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocMod_add_zsmul']
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_zsmul' toIocMod_sub_zsmul'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (b + p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right toIcoMod_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (a + p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ico_mod_add_right' toIcoMod_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (b + p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right toIocMod_add_right
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocMod hp (a + p) b = toIocMod hp a b + p := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocMod_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
#align to_Ioc_mod_add_right' toIocMod_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a (p + b) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_left toIcoMod_add_left
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp (p + a) b = p + toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_right', add_comm]
#align to_Ico_mod_add_left' toIcoMod_add_left'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 505 | 506 | theorem toIocMod_add_left (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a (p + b) = toIocMod hp a b := by |
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_right]
|
import Batteries.Data.Fin.Basic
namespace Fin
attribute [norm_cast] val_last
protected theorem le_antisymm_iff {x y : Fin n} : x = y ↔ x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans Nat.le_antisymm_iff
protected theorem le_antisymm {x y : Fin n} (h1 : x ≤ y) (h2 : y ≤ x) : x = y :=
Fin.le_antisymm_iff.2 ⟨h1, h2⟩
@[simp] theorem coe_clamp (n m : Nat) : (clamp n m : Nat) = min n m := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_enum (n) : (enum n).size = n := Array.size_ofFn ..
@[simp] theorem enum_zero : (enum 0) = #[] := by simp [enum, Array.ofFn, Array.ofFn.go]
@[simp] theorem getElem_enum (i) (h : i < (enum n).size) : (enum n)[i] = ⟨i, size_enum n ▸ h⟩ :=
Array.getElem_ofFn ..
@[simp] theorem length_list (n) : (list n).length = n := by simp [list]
@[simp] theorem get_list (i : Fin (list n).length) : (list n).get i = i.cast (length_list n) := by
cases i; simp only [list]; rw [← Array.getElem_eq_data_get, getElem_enum, cast_mk]
@[simp] theorem list_zero : list 0 = [] := by simp [list]
theorem list_succ (n) : list (n+1) = 0 :: (list n).map Fin.succ := by
apply List.ext_get; simp; intro i; cases i <;> simp
theorem list_succ_last (n) : list (n+1) = (list n).map castSucc ++ [last n] := by
rw [list_succ]
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
rw [list_succ, List.map_cons castSucc, ih]
simp [Function.comp_def, succ_castSucc]
theorem list_reverse (n) : (list n).reverse = (list n).map rev := by
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih =>
conv => lhs; rw [list_succ_last]
conv => rhs; rw [list_succ]
simp [List.reverse_map, ih, Function.comp_def, rev_succ]
theorem foldl_loop_lt (f : α → Fin n → α) (x) (h : m < n) :
foldl.loop n f x m = foldl.loop n f (f x ⟨m, h⟩) (m+1) := by
rw [foldl.loop, dif_pos h]
theorem foldl_loop_eq (f : α → Fin n → α) (x) : foldl.loop n f x n = x := by
rw [foldl.loop, dif_neg (Nat.lt_irrefl _)]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Fin/Lemmas.lean | 66 | 73 | theorem foldl_loop (f : α → Fin (n+1) → α) (x) (h : m < n+1) :
foldl.loop (n+1) f x m = foldl.loop n (fun x i => f x i.succ) (f x ⟨m, h⟩) m := by |
if h' : m < n then
rw [foldl_loop_lt _ _ h, foldl_loop_lt _ _ h', foldl_loop]; rfl
else
cases Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h) (Nat.not_lt.1 h')
rw [foldl_loop_lt, foldl_loop_eq, foldl_loop_eq]
termination_by n - m
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.alexandroff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
open Set Filter Topology
variable {X : Type*}
def OnePoint (X : Type*) :=
Option X
#align alexandroff OnePoint
instance [Repr X] : Repr (OnePoint X) :=
⟨fun o _ =>
match o with
| none => "∞"
| some a => "↑" ++ repr a⟩
namespace OnePoint
@[match_pattern] def infty : OnePoint X := none
#align alexandroff.infty OnePoint.infty
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "∞" => OnePoint.infty
@[coe, match_pattern] def some : X → OnePoint X := Option.some
instance : CoeTC X (OnePoint X) := ⟨some⟩
instance : Inhabited (OnePoint X) := ⟨∞⟩
instance [Fintype X] : Fintype (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Fintype (Option X))
instance infinite [Infinite X] : Infinite (OnePoint X) :=
inferInstanceAs (Infinite (Option X))
#align alexandroff.infinite OnePoint.infinite
theorem coe_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
Option.some_injective X
#align alexandroff.coe_injective OnePoint.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_coe {x y : X} : (x : OnePoint X) = y ↔ x = y :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
#align alexandroff.coe_eq_coe OnePoint.coe_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_infty (x : X) : (x : OnePoint X) ≠ ∞ :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.coe_ne_infty OnePoint.coe_ne_infty
@[simp]
theorem infty_ne_coe (x : X) : ∞ ≠ (x : OnePoint X) :=
nofun
#align alexandroff.infty_ne_coe OnePoint.infty_ne_coe
@[elab_as_elim]
protected def rec {C : OnePoint X → Sort*} (h₁ : C ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x : X, C x) :
∀ z : OnePoint X, C z
| ∞ => h₁
| (x : X) => h₂ x
#align alexandroff.rec OnePoint.rec
theorem isCompl_range_coe_infty : IsCompl (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) {∞} :=
isCompl_range_some_none X
#align alexandroff.is_compl_range_coe_infty OnePoint.isCompl_range_coe_infty
-- Porting note: moved @[simp] to a new lemma
theorem range_coe_union_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∪ {∞} = univ :=
range_some_union_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_union_infty OnePoint.range_coe_union_infty
@[simp]
theorem insert_infty_range_coe : insert ∞ (range (@some X)) = univ :=
insert_none_range_some _
@[simp]
theorem range_coe_inter_infty : range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ∩ {∞} = ∅ :=
range_some_inter_none X
#align alexandroff.range_coe_inter_infty OnePoint.range_coe_inter_infty
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_coe : (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X))ᶜ = {∞} :=
compl_range_some X
#align alexandroff.compl_range_coe OnePoint.compl_range_coe
theorem compl_infty : ({∞}ᶜ : Set (OnePoint X)) = range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
(@isCompl_range_coe_infty X).symm.compl_eq
#align alexandroff.compl_infty OnePoint.compl_infty
theorem compl_image_coe (s : Set X) : ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ = (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [coe_injective.compl_image_eq, compl_range_coe]
#align alexandroff.compl_image_coe OnePoint.compl_image_coe
theorem ne_infty_iff_exists {x : OnePoint X} : x ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ y : X, (y : OnePoint X) = x := by
induction x using OnePoint.rec <;> simp
#align alexandroff.ne_infty_iff_exists OnePoint.ne_infty_iff_exists
instance canLift : CanLift (OnePoint X) X (↑) fun x => x ≠ ∞ :=
WithTop.canLift
#align alexandroff.can_lift OnePoint.canLift
theorem not_mem_range_coe_iff {x : OnePoint X} : x ∉ range some ↔ x = ∞ := by
rw [← mem_compl_iff, compl_range_coe, mem_singleton_iff]
#align alexandroff.not_mem_range_coe_iff OnePoint.not_mem_range_coe_iff
theorem infty_not_mem_range_coe : ∞ ∉ range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
not_mem_range_coe_iff.2 rfl
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_range_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_range_coe
theorem infty_not_mem_image_coe {s : Set X} : ∞ ∉ ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) '' s :=
not_mem_subset (image_subset_range _ _) infty_not_mem_range_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_not_mem_image_coe OnePoint.infty_not_mem_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_preimage_infty : ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' {∞} = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align alexandroff.coe_preimage_infty OnePoint.coe_preimage_infty
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
instance : TopologicalSpace (OnePoint X) where
IsOpen s := (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)ᶜ) ∧
IsOpen (((↑) : X → OnePoint X) ⁻¹' s)
isOpen_univ := by simp
isOpen_inter s t := by
rintro ⟨hms, hs⟩ ⟨hmt, ht⟩
refine ⟨?_, hs.inter ht⟩
rintro ⟨hms', hmt'⟩
simpa [compl_inter] using (hms hms').union (hmt hmt')
isOpen_sUnion S ho := by
suffices IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' ⋃₀ S : Set X) by
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rintro ⟨s, hsS : s ∈ S, hs : ∞ ∈ s⟩
refine IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset ((ho s hsS).1 hs) this.isClosed_compl ?_
exact compl_subset_compl.mpr (preimage_mono <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hsS)
rw [preimage_sUnion]
exact isOpen_biUnion fun s hs => (ho s hs).2
variable {s : Set (OnePoint X)} {t : Set X}
theorem isOpen_def :
IsOpen s ↔ (∞ ∈ s → IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ) ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) :=
Iff.rfl
#align alexandroff.is_open_def OnePoint.isOpen_def
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem' (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem' OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem'
theorem isOpen_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) :
IsOpen s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X)ᶜ := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_of_mem' h, isClosed_compl_iff, and_comm]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_mem
theorem isOpen_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) : IsOpen s ↔ IsOpen ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
simp [isOpen_def, h]
#align alexandroff.is_open_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isOpen_iff_of_not_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_mem (h : ∞ ∈ s) : IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
have : ∞ ∉ sᶜ := fun H => H h
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_not_mem this, ← isOpen_compl_iff, preimage_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_mem
theorem isClosed_iff_of_not_mem (h : ∞ ∉ s) :
IsClosed s ↔ IsClosed ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) ∧ IsCompact ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set X) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_of_mem (mem_compl h), ← preimage_compl, compl_compl]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_iff_of_not_mem OnePoint.isClosed_iff_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_image_coe {s : Set X} : IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_not_mem infty_not_mem_image_coe, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.is_open_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_image_coe
theorem isOpen_compl_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsOpen ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X))ᶜ ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_of_mem, ← preimage_compl, compl_compl, preimage_image_eq _ coe_injective]
exact infty_not_mem_image_coe
#align alexandroff.is_open_compl_image_coe OnePoint.isOpen_compl_image_coe
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_image_coe {s : Set X} :
IsClosed ((↑) '' s : Set (OnePoint X)) ↔ IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_compl_image_coe]
#align alexandroff.is_closed_image_coe OnePoint.isClosed_image_coe
def opensOfCompl (s : Set X) (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsCompact s) :
TopologicalSpace.Opens (OnePoint X) :=
⟨((↑) '' s)ᶜ, isOpen_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
#align alexandroff.opens_of_compl OnePoint.opensOfCompl
theorem infty_mem_opensOfCompl {s : Set X} (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsCompact s) :
∞ ∈ opensOfCompl s h₁ h₂ :=
mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe
#align alexandroff.infty_mem_opens_of_compl OnePoint.infty_mem_opensOfCompl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
continuous_def.mpr fun _s hs => hs.right
#align alexandroff.continuous_coe OnePoint.continuous_coe
theorem isOpenMap_coe : IsOpenMap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) := fun _ => isOpen_image_coe.2
#align alexandroff.is_open_map_coe OnePoint.isOpenMap_coe
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) :=
openEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_open continuous_coe coe_injective isOpenMap_coe
#align alexandroff.open_embedding_coe OnePoint.openEmbedding_coe
theorem isOpen_range_coe : IsOpen (range ((↑) : X → OnePoint X)) :=
openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range
#align alexandroff.is_open_range_coe OnePoint.isOpen_range_coe
theorem isClosed_infty : IsClosed ({∞} : Set (OnePoint X)) := by
rw [← compl_range_coe, isClosed_compl_iff]
exact isOpen_range_coe
#align alexandroff.is_closed_infty OnePoint.isClosed_infty
theorem nhds_coe_eq (x : X) : 𝓝 ↑x = map ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq x).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_coe_eq OnePoint.nhds_coe_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_coe_image (s : Set X) (x : X) :
𝓝[(↑) '' s] (x : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (𝓝[s] x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq _ _).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_coe_image OnePoint.nhdsWithin_coe_image
theorem nhdsWithin_coe (s : Set (OnePoint X)) (x : X) : 𝓝[s] ↑x = map (↑) (𝓝[(↑) ⁻¹' s] x) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhdsWithin_preimage_eq _ _).symm
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_coe OnePoint.nhdsWithin_coe
theorem comap_coe_nhds (x : X) : comap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 x :=
(openEmbedding_coe.toInducing.nhds_eq_comap x).symm
#align alexandroff.comap_coe_nhds OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds
instance nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot (x : X) [h : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] :
NeBot (𝓝[≠] (x : OnePoint X)) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin_coe, preimage, coe_eq_coe] using h.map some
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_coe_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq : 𝓝[≠] (∞ : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (coclosedCompact X) := by
refine (nhdsWithin_basis_open ∞ _).ext (hasBasis_coclosedCompact.map _) ?_ ?_
· rintro s ⟨hs, hso⟩
refine ⟨_, (isOpen_iff_of_mem hs).mp hso, ?_⟩
simp [Subset.rfl]
· rintro s ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨_, ⟨mem_compl infty_not_mem_image_coe, isOpen_compl_image_coe.2 ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩, ?_⟩
simp [compl_image_coe, ← diff_eq, subset_preimage_image]
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_eq OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq
instance nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (∞ : OnePoint X)) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq]
infer_instance
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_infty_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot
instance (priority := 900) nhdsWithin_compl_neBot [∀ x : X, NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] [NoncompactSpace X]
(x : OnePoint X) : NeBot (𝓝[≠] x) :=
OnePoint.rec OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_infty_neBot
(fun y => OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_coe_neBot y) x
#align alexandroff.nhds_within_compl_ne_bot OnePoint.nhdsWithin_compl_neBot
theorem nhds_infty_eq : 𝓝 (∞ : OnePoint X) = map (↑) (coclosedCompact X) ⊔ pure ∞ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_compl_infty_eq, nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure]
#align alexandroff.nhds_infty_eq OnePoint.nhds_infty_eq
theorem hasBasis_nhds_infty :
(𝓝 (∞ : OnePoint X)).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s) fun s =>
(↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} := by
rw [nhds_infty_eq]
exact (hasBasis_coclosedCompact.map _).sup_pure _
#align alexandroff.has_basis_nhds_infty OnePoint.hasBasis_nhds_infty
@[simp]
theorem comap_coe_nhds_infty : comap ((↑) : X → OnePoint X) (𝓝 ∞) = coclosedCompact X := by
simp [nhds_infty_eq, comap_sup, comap_map coe_injective]
#align alexandroff.comap_coe_nhds_infty OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds_infty
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactification/OnePoint.lean | 346 | 348 | theorem le_nhds_infty {f : Filter (OnePoint X)} :
f ≤ 𝓝 ∞ ↔ ∀ s : Set X, IsClosed s → IsCompact s → (↑) '' sᶜ ∪ {∞} ∈ f := by |
simp only [hasBasis_nhds_infty.ge_iff, and_imp]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.AffineMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LocalExtr.Rolle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Normed
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
#align_import analysis.calculus.mean_value from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Metric Set Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Filter
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
change Icc a b ⊆ { x | f x ≤ B x }
set s := { x | f x ≤ B x } ∩ Icc a b
have A : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f x, B x)) (Icc a b) := hf.prod hB
have : IsClosed s := by
simp only [s, inter_comm]
exact A.preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed isClosed_Icc OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'
apply this.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxB : f x ≤ B x, xab⟩ y hy
cases' hxB.lt_or_eq with hxB hxB
· -- If `f x < B x`, then all we need is continuity of both sides
refine nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem ?_ (Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hy⟩))
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[Icc a b] x, f x < B x :=
A x (Ico_subset_Icc_self xab) (IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd) hxB)
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[>] x, f x < B x := nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi xab) this
exact this.mono fun y => le_of_lt
· rcases exists_between (bound x xab hxB) with ⟨r, hfr, hrB⟩
specialize hf' x xab r hfr
have HB : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, r < slope B x z :=
(hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' <| lt_irrefl x).1 (hB' x xab).Ioi_of_Ici
(Ioi_mem_nhds hrB)
obtain ⟨z, hfz, hzB, hz⟩ : ∃ z, slope f x z < r ∧ r < slope B x z ∧ z ∈ Ioc x y :=
(hf'.and_eventually (HB.and (Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hy⟩))).exists
refine ⟨z, ?_, hz⟩
have := (hfz.trans hzB).le
rwa [slope_def_field, slope_def_field, div_le_div_right (sub_pos.2 hz.1), hxB,
sub_le_sub_iff_right] at this
#align image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary'
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
#align image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary
theorem image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary {f : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) {B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
-- `bound` actually says `liminf (f z - f x) / (z - x) ≤ B' x`
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, B' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope f x z < r) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x := by
have Hr : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ∀ r > 0, f x ≤ B x + r * (x - a) := fun x hx r hr => by
apply image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf bound
· rwa [sub_self, mul_zero, add_zero]
· exact hB.add (continuousOn_const.mul (continuousOn_id.sub continuousOn_const))
· intro x hx
exact (hB' x hx).add (((hasDerivWithinAt_id x (Ici x)).sub_const a).const_mul r)
· intro x _ _
rw [mul_one]
exact (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 hr
exact hx
intro x hx
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => B x + r * (x - a)) (Ioi 0) 0 :=
continuousWithinAt_const.add (continuousWithinAt_id.mul continuousWithinAt_const)
convert continuousWithinAt_const.closure_le _ this (Hr x hx) using 1 <;> simp
#align image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
#align image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary'
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
#align image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary image_le_of_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary
theorem image_le_of_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f f' : ℝ → ℝ} {a b : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : f a ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, f' x ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → f x ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary hf ha hB hB' fun x hx _ hr =>
(hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_le (lt_of_le_of_lt (bound x hx) hr)
#align image_le_of_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary image_le_of_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary
section
variable {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ}
theorem image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℝ → E} {f' : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
-- `hf'` actually says `liminf (‖f z‖ - ‖f x‖) / (z - x) ≤ f' x`
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ∀ r, f' x < r → ∃ᶠ z in 𝓝[>] x, slope (norm ∘ f) x z < r)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → f' x < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_lt_deriv_boundary' (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) hf' ha hB
hB' bound
#align image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_liminf_right_slope_norm_lt_deriv_boundary hf
(fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le hr) ha hB hB' bound
#align image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary'
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f x‖ = B x → ‖f' x‖ < B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
#align image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_lt_deriv_boundary
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ContinuousOn B (Icc a b))
(hB' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt B (B' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_le_of_liminf_slope_right_le_deriv_boundary (continuous_norm.comp_continuousOn hf) ha hB hB'
fun x hx _ hr => (hf' x hx).liminf_right_slope_norm_le ((bound x hx).trans_lt hr)
#align image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary'
theorem image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary {f' : ℝ → E}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
{B B' : ℝ → ℝ} (ha : ‖f a‖ ≤ B a) (hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B (B' x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ B' x) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ Icc a b → ‖f x‖ ≤ B x :=
image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary' hf hf' ha
(fun x _ => (hB x).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt) (fun x _ => (hB x).hasDerivWithinAt) bound
#align image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Ici x) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
let g x := f x - f a
have hg : ContinuousOn g (Icc a b) := hf.sub continuousOn_const
have hg' : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt g (f' x) (Ici x) x := by
intro x hx
simpa using (hf' x hx).sub (hasDerivWithinAt_const _ _ _)
let B x := C * (x - a)
have hB : ∀ x, HasDerivAt B C x := by
intro x
simpa using (hasDerivAt_const x C).mul ((hasDerivAt_id x).sub (hasDerivAt_const x a))
convert image_norm_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_deriv_boundary hg hg' _ hB bound
simp only [g, B]; rw [sub_self, norm_zero, sub_self, mul_zero]
#align norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc a b) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment (fun x hx => (hf x hx).continuousWithinAt)
(fun x hx => ?_) bound
exact (hf x <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hx).mono_of_mem (Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici hx)
#align norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment'
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment {C : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ C) :
∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ C * (x - a) := by
refine norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' ?_ bound
exact fun x hx => (hf x hx).hasDerivWithinAt
#align norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' {f' : ℝ → E} {C : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, HasDerivWithinAt f (f' x) (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x)
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖f' x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
#align norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01' norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01'
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01 {C : ℝ}
(hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1))
(bound : ∀ x ∈ Ico (0 : ℝ) 1, ‖derivWithin f (Icc (0 : ℝ) 1) x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f 1 - f 0‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [sub_zero, mul_one] using
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment hf bound 1 (right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
#align norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01 norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment_01
theorem constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero (hcont : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, HasDerivWithinAt f 0 (Ici x) x) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := by
have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - f a‖ ≤ 0 * (x - a) := fun x hx =>
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_right_le_segment hcont hderiv (fun _ _ => norm_zero.le) x hx
simpa only [zero_mul, norm_le_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero] using this
#align constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero constant_of_has_deriv_right_zero
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/MeanValue.lean | 401 | 406 | theorem constant_of_derivWithin_zero (hdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (Icc a b))
(hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, derivWithin f (Icc a b) x = 0) : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := by |
have H : ∀ x ∈ Ico a b, ‖derivWithin f (Icc a b) x‖ ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [norm_le_zero_iff] using fun x hx => hderiv x hx
simpa only [zero_mul, norm_le_zero_iff, sub_eq_zero] using fun x hx =>
norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment hdiff H x hx
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.mul from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section Mul
variable {𝕜' 𝔸 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸]
{c d : 𝕜 → 𝔸} {c' d' : 𝔸} {u v : 𝕜 → 𝕜'}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mul (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hd : HasDerivWithinAt d d' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') s x := by
have := (HasFDerivWithinAt.mul' hc hd).hasDerivWithinAt
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, one_smul, one_smul,
add_comm] at this
#align has_deriv_within_at.mul HasDerivWithinAt.mul
theorem HasDerivAt.mul (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasDerivAt d d' x) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.mul hd
#align has_deriv_at.mul HasDerivAt.mul
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.mul (hc : HasStrictDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictDerivAt d d' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c' * d x + c x * d') x := by
have := (HasStrictFDerivAt.mul' hc hd).hasStrictDerivAt
rwa [ContinuousLinearMap.add_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, one_smul, one_smul,
add_comm] at this
#align has_strict_deriv_at.mul HasStrictDerivAt.mul
theorem derivWithin_mul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
derivWithin (fun y => c y * d y) s x = derivWithin c s x * d x + c x * derivWithin d s x :=
(hc.hasDerivWithinAt.mul hd.hasDerivWithinAt).derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within_mul derivWithin_mul
@[simp]
theorem deriv_mul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
deriv (fun y => c y * d y) x = deriv c x * d x + c x * deriv d x :=
(hc.hasDerivAt.mul hd.hasDerivAt).deriv
#align deriv_mul deriv_mul
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.mul_const (hc : HasDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (d : 𝔸) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y * d) (c' * d) s x := by
convert hc.mul (hasDerivWithinAt_const x s d) using 1
rw [mul_zero, add_zero]
#align has_deriv_within_at.mul_const HasDerivWithinAt.mul_const
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Mul.lean | 248 | 251 | theorem HasDerivAt.mul_const (hc : HasDerivAt c c' x) (d : 𝔸) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => c y * d) (c' * d) x := by |
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hc.mul_const d
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
#align is_closed_Union isClosed_iUnion_of_finite
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
#align is_closed_imp isClosed_imp
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
#align is_closed.not IsClosed.not
theorem mem_interior : x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp only [interior, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_interior mem_interiorₓ
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_interior : IsOpen (interior s) :=
isOpen_sUnion fun _ => And.left
#align is_open_interior isOpen_interior
theorem interior_subset : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ => And.right
#align interior_subset interior_subset
theorem interior_maximal (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align interior_maximal interior_maximal
theorem IsOpen.interior_eq (h : IsOpen s) : interior s = s :=
interior_subset.antisymm (interior_maximal (Subset.refl s) h)
#align is_open.interior_eq IsOpen.interior_eq
theorem interior_eq_iff_isOpen : interior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isOpen_interior, IsOpen.interior_eq⟩
#align interior_eq_iff_is_open interior_eq_iff_isOpen
theorem subset_interior_iff_isOpen : s ⊆ interior s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [interior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
#align subset_interior_iff_is_open subset_interior_iff_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.subset_interior_iff (h₁ : IsOpen s) : s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h interior_subset, fun h₂ => interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
#align is_open.subset_interior_iff IsOpen.subset_interior_iff
theorem subset_interior_iff : t ⊆ interior s ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨interior s, isOpen_interior, h, interior_subset⟩, fun ⟨_U, hU, htU, hUs⟩ =>
htU.trans (interior_maximal hUs hU)⟩
#align subset_interior_iff subset_interior_iff
lemma interior_subset_iff : interior s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t := by
simp [interior]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem interior_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (Subset.trans interior_subset h) isOpen_interior
#align interior_mono interior_mono
@[simp]
theorem interior_empty : interior (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isOpen_empty.interior_eq
#align interior_empty interior_empty
@[simp]
theorem interior_univ : interior (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isOpen_univ.interior_eq
#align interior_univ interior_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_eq_univ : interior s = univ ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => univ_subset_iff.mp <| h.symm.trans_le interior_subset, fun h => h.symm ▸ interior_univ⟩
#align interior_eq_univ interior_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_interior : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
isOpen_interior.interior_eq
#align interior_interior interior_interior
@[simp]
theorem interior_inter : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
(Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono) s t).antisymm <|
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) <|
isOpen_interior.inter isOpen_interior
#align interior_inter interior_inter
theorem Set.Finite.interior_biInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
hs.induction_on (by simp) <| by intros; simp [*]
theorem Set.Finite.interior_sInter {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, hS.interior_biInter]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.interior_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.interior_biInter f
#align finset.interior_Inter Finset.interior_iInter
@[simp]
theorem interior_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) := by
rw [← sInter_range, (finite_range f).interior_sInter, biInter_range]
#align interior_Inter interior_iInter_of_finite
theorem interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty (h₁ : IsClosed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) : interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have : interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s := fun x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : IsOpen u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun hx₂ : x ∉ s =>
have : u \ s ⊆ t := fun x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂
have : u \ s ⊆ interior t := by rwa [(IsOpen.sdiff hu₁ h₁).subset_interior_iff]
have : u \ s ⊆ ∅ := by rwa [h₂] at this
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
Subset.antisymm (interior_maximal this isOpen_interior) (interior_mono subset_union_left)
#align interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty
theorem isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_isOpen]
simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
#align is_open_iff_forall_mem_open isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open
theorem interior_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set X) : interior (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, interior (s i) :=
subset_iInter fun _ => interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
#align interior_Inter_subset interior_iInter_subset
theorem interior_iInter₂_subset (p : ι → Sort*) (s : ∀ i, p i → Set X) :
interior (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), interior (s i j) :=
(interior_iInter_subset _).trans <| iInter_mono fun _ => interior_iInter_subset _
#align interior_Inter₂_subset interior_iInter₂_subset
theorem interior_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set X)) : interior (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s :=
calc
interior (⋂₀ S) = interior (⋂ s ∈ S, s) := by rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
_ ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := interior_iInter₂_subset _ _
#align interior_sInter_subset interior_sInter_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' interior).HasBasis p fun i => interior (s i) :=
h.lift' fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono
theorem Filter.lift'_interior_le (l : Filter X) : l.lift' interior ≤ l := fun _s hs ↦
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (ho : ∀ i, p i → IsOpen (s i)) : l.lift' interior = l :=
le_antisymm l.lift'_interior_le <| h.lift'_interior.ge_iff.2 fun i hi ↦ by
simpa only [(ho i hi).interior_eq] using h.mem_of_mem hi
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_closure : IsClosed (closure s) :=
isClosed_sInter fun _ => And.left
#align is_closed_closure isClosed_closure
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter fun _ => And.right
#align subset_closure subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : X} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align not_mem_of_not_mem_closure not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
theorem closure_minimal (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align closure_minimal closure_minimal
theorem Disjoint.closure_left (hd : Disjoint s t) (ht : IsOpen t) :
Disjoint (closure s) t :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_left <| closure_minimal hd.subset_compl_right ht.isClosed_compl
#align disjoint.closure_left Disjoint.closure_left
theorem Disjoint.closure_right (hd : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
Disjoint s (closure t) :=
(hd.symm.closure_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.closure_right Disjoint.closure_right
theorem IsClosed.closure_eq (h : IsClosed s) : closure s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (Subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
#align is_closed.closure_eq IsClosed.closure_eq
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : closure s ⊆ s :=
closure_minimal (Subset.refl _) hs
#align is_closed.closure_subset IsClosed.closure_subset
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset_iff (h₁ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => closure_minimal h h₁⟩
#align is_closed.closure_subset_iff IsClosed.closure_subset_iff
theorem IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) :
x ∈ s ↔ closure ({x} : Set X) ⊆ s :=
(hs.closure_subset_iff.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff).symm
#align is_closed.mem_iff_closure_subset IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem closure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (Subset.trans h subset_closure) isClosed_closure
#align closure_mono closure_mono
theorem monotone_closure (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Monotone (@closure X _) := fun _ _ =>
closure_mono
#align monotone_closure monotone_closure
theorem diff_subset_closure_iff : s \ t ⊆ closure t ↔ s ⊆ closure t := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, union_eq_self_of_subset_left subset_closure]
#align diff_subset_closure_iff diff_subset_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : Set X) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure X).map_inf_le s t
#align closure_inter_subset_inter_closure closure_inter_subset_inter_closure
theorem isClosed_of_closure_subset (h : closure s ⊆ s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [subset_closure.antisymm h]; exact isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_of_closure_subset isClosed_of_closure_subset
theorem closure_eq_iff_isClosed : closure s = s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isClosed_closure, IsClosed.closure_eq⟩
#align closure_eq_iff_is_closed closure_eq_iff_isClosed
theorem closure_subset_iff_isClosed : closure s ⊆ s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨isClosed_of_closure_subset, IsClosed.closure_subset⟩
#align closure_subset_iff_is_closed closure_subset_iff_isClosed
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isClosed_empty.closure_eq
#align closure_empty closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty_iff (s : Set X) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, fun h => h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
#align closure_empty_iff closure_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_nonempty_iff : (closure s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, closure_empty_iff]
#align closure_nonempty_iff closure_nonempty_iff
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.of_closure, Set.Nonempty.closure⟩ := closure_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty.of_closure Set.Nonempty.of_closure
#align set.nonempty.closure Set.Nonempty.closure
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isClosed_univ.closure_eq
#align closure_univ closure_univ
@[simp]
theorem closure_closure : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
isClosed_closure.closure_eq
#align closure_closure closure_closure
theorem closure_eq_compl_interior_compl : closure s = (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [interior, closure, compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of]
simp only [compl_subset_compl, isOpen_compl_iff]
#align closure_eq_compl_interior_compl closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_union : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, compl_inter]
#align closure_union closure_union
theorem Set.Finite.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, hs.interior_biInter]
theorem Set.Finite.closure_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
closure (⋃₀ S) = ⋃ s ∈ S, closure s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hS.closure_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.closure_biUnion f
#align finset.closure_bUnion Finset.closure_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem closure_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) := by
rw [← sUnion_range, (finite_range _).closure_sUnion, biUnion_range]
#align closure_Union closure_iUnion_of_finite
theorem interior_subset_closure : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
Subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
#align interior_subset_closure interior_subset_closure
@[simp]
theorem interior_compl : interior sᶜ = (closure s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align interior_compl interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_compl : closure sᶜ = (interior s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align closure_compl closure_compl
theorem mem_closure_iff :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, IsOpen o → x ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h o oo ao =>
by_contradiction fun os =>
have : s ⊆ oᶜ := fun x xs xo => os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩
closure_minimal this (isClosed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
fun H _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun nc =>
let ⟨_, hc, hs⟩ := H _ h₁.isOpen_compl nc
hc (h₂ hs)⟩
#align mem_closure_iff mem_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff (h : IsOpen t) :
(closure s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hxcs, hxt⟩ => inter_comm t s ▸ mem_closure_iff.1 hxcs t h hxt, fun h =>
h.mono <| inf_le_inf_right t subset_closure⟩
#align closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff
theorem Filter.le_lift'_closure (l : Filter X) : l ≤ l.lift' closure :=
le_lift'.2 fun _ h => mem_of_superset h subset_closure
#align filter.le_lift'_closure Filter.le_lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' closure).HasBasis p fun i => closure (s i) :=
h.lift' (monotone_closure X)
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (hc : ∀ i, p i → IsClosed (s i)) : l.lift' closure = l :=
le_antisymm (h.ge_iff.2 fun i hi => (hc i hi).closure_eq ▸ mem_lift' (h.mem_of_mem hi))
l.le_lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure_eq_self Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot {l : Filter X} : l.lift' closure = ⊥ ↔ l = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique <| h ▸ l.le_lift'_closure, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ by rw [lift'_bot (monotone_closure _), closure_empty, principal_empty]⟩
#align filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot
theorem dense_iff_closure_eq : Dense s ↔ closure s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align dense_iff_closure_eq dense_iff_closure_eq
alias ⟨Dense.closure_eq, _⟩ := dense_iff_closure_eq
#align dense.closure_eq Dense.closure_eq
theorem interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl : interior s = ∅ ↔ Dense sᶜ := by
rw [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_compl, compl_univ_iff]
#align interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl
theorem Dense.interior_compl (h : Dense s) : interior sᶜ = ∅ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 <| by rwa [compl_compl]
#align dense.interior_compl Dense.interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem dense_closure : Dense (closure s) ↔ Dense s := by
rw [Dense, Dense, closure_closure]
#align dense_closure dense_closure
protected alias ⟨_, Dense.closure⟩ := dense_closure
alias ⟨Dense.of_closure, _⟩ := dense_closure
#align dense.of_closure Dense.of_closure
#align dense.closure Dense.closure
@[simp]
theorem dense_univ : Dense (univ : Set X) := fun _ => subset_closure trivial
#align dense_univ dense_univ
theorem dense_iff_inter_open :
Dense s ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U.Nonempty → (U ∩ s).Nonempty := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rintro U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (h _) U U_op x_in
· intro x
rw [mem_closure_iff]
intro U U_op x_in
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩
#align dense_iff_inter_open dense_iff_inter_open
alias ⟨Dense.inter_open_nonempty, _⟩ := dense_iff_inter_open
#align dense.inter_open_nonempty Dense.inter_open_nonempty
theorem Dense.exists_mem_open (hs : Dense s) {U : Set X} (ho : IsOpen U)
(hne : U.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ U :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho hne
⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩
#align dense.exists_mem_open Dense.exists_mem_open
theorem Dense.nonempty_iff (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty ↔ Nonempty X :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty _ isOpen_univ ⟨x, trivial⟩
⟨y, hy.2⟩⟩
#align dense.nonempty_iff Dense.nonempty_iff
theorem Dense.nonempty [h : Nonempty X] (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.nonempty_iff.2 h
#align dense.nonempty Dense.nonempty
@[mono]
theorem Dense.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : Dense s₁) : Dense s₂ := fun x =>
closure_mono h (hd x)
#align dense.mono Dense.mono
theorem dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open :
Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) ↔ ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro hd ho
exact (hd.inter_open_nonempty _ ho (singleton_nonempty _)).ne_empty (inter_compl_self _)
· refine fun ho => dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU hne => inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 fun hUx => ?_
obtain rfl : U = {x} := eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem.2 ⟨hne, hUx⟩
exact ho hU
#align dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_interior (s : Set X) : closure s \ interior s = frontier s :=
rfl
#align closure_diff_interior closure_diff_interior
lemma disjoint_interior_frontier : Disjoint (interior s) (frontier s) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← closure_diff_interior, diff_eq,
← inter_assoc, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, compl_inter_self, empty_inter]
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right_self, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset_closure]
#align closure_diff_frontier closure_diff_frontier
@[simp]
theorem self_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right, diff_eq_empty.2 subset_closure,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset, empty_union]
#align self_diff_frontier self_diff_frontier
theorem frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure : frontier s = closure s ∩ closure sᶜ := by
rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
#align frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure
theorem frontier_subset_closure : frontier s ⊆ closure s :=
diff_subset
#align frontier_subset_closure frontier_subset_closure
theorem IsClosed.frontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s ⊆ s :=
frontier_subset_closure.trans hs.closure_eq.subset
#align is_closed.frontier_subset IsClosed.frontier_subset
theorem frontier_closure_subset : frontier (closure s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff closure_closure.subset <| interior_mono subset_closure
#align frontier_closure_subset frontier_closure_subset
theorem frontier_interior_subset : frontier (interior s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff (closure_mono interior_subset) interior_interior.symm.subset
#align frontier_interior_subset frontier_interior_subset
@[simp]
theorem frontier_compl (s : Set X) : frontier sᶜ = frontier s := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
#align frontier_compl frontier_compl
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ : frontier (univ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_univ frontier_univ
@[simp]
theorem frontier_empty : frontier (∅ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_empty frontier_empty
theorem frontier_inter_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure t ∪ closure s ∩ frontier t := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union]
refine (inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t)).trans_eq ?_
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc,
inter_comm (closure t)]
#align frontier_inter_subset frontier_inter_subset
theorem frontier_union_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure tᶜ ∪ closure sᶜ ∩ frontier t := by
simpa only [frontier_compl, ← compl_union] using frontier_inter_subset sᶜ tᶜ
#align frontier_union_subset frontier_union_subset
theorem IsClosed.frontier_eq (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s = s \ interior s := by
rw [frontier, hs.closure_eq]
#align is_closed.frontier_eq IsClosed.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : frontier s = closure s \ s := by
rw [frontier, hs.interior_eq]
#align is_open.frontier_eq IsOpen.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ frontier s = ∅ := by
rw [hs.frontier_eq, inter_diff_self]
#align is_open.inter_frontier_eq IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq
theorem isClosed_frontier : IsClosed (frontier s) := by
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure]; exact IsClosed.inter isClosed_closure isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_frontier isClosed_frontier
theorem interior_frontier (h : IsClosed s) : interior (frontier s) = ∅ := by
have A : frontier s = s \ interior s := h.frontier_eq
have B : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s := by rw [A]; exact interior_mono diff_subset
have C : interior (frontier s) ⊆ frontier s := interior_subset
have : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s ∩ (s \ interior s) :=
subset_inter B (by simpa [A] using C)
rwa [inter_diff_self, subset_empty_iff] at this
#align interior_frontier interior_frontier
theorem closure_eq_interior_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = interior s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel interior_subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_interior_union_frontier closure_eq_interior_union_frontier
theorem closure_eq_self_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel' interior_subset subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_self_union_frontier closure_eq_self_union_frontier
theorem Disjoint.frontier_left (ht : IsOpen t) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (frontier s) t :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right.1 <|
frontier_subset_closure.trans <| closure_minimal (disjoint_left.1 hd) <| isClosed_compl_iff.2 ht
#align disjoint.frontier_left Disjoint.frontier_left
theorem Disjoint.frontier_right (hs : IsOpen s) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint s (frontier t) :=
(hd.symm.frontier_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.frontier_right Disjoint.frontier_right
theorem frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior :
frontier s = (interior s)ᶜ ∩ (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [← frontier_compl, ← closure_compl, ← diff_eq, closure_diff_interior]
#align frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior
theorem compl_frontier_eq_union_interior :
(frontier s)ᶜ = interior s ∪ interior sᶜ := by
rw [frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior]
simp only [compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align compl_frontier_eq_union_interior compl_frontier_eq_union_interior
theorem nhds_def' (x : X) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsOpen s) (_ : x ∈ s), 𝓟 s := by
simp only [nhds_def, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (x ∈ _), iInf_and]
#align nhds_def' nhds_def'
theorem nhds_basis_opens (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s) fun s => s := by
rw [nhds_def]
exact hasBasis_biInf_principal
(fun s ⟨has, hs⟩ t ⟨hat, ht⟩ =>
⟨s ∩ t, ⟨⟨has, hat⟩, IsOpen.inter hs ht⟩, ⟨inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right⟩⟩)
⟨univ, ⟨mem_univ x, isOpen_univ⟩⟩
#align nhds_basis_opens nhds_basis_opens
theorem nhds_basis_closeds (x : X) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => x ∉ s ∧ IsClosed s) compl :=
⟨fun t => (nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.trans <|
compl_surjective.exists.trans <| by simp only [isOpen_compl_iff, mem_compl_iff]⟩
#align nhds_basis_closeds nhds_basis_closeds
@[simp]
theorem lift'_nhds_interior (x : X) : (𝓝 x).lift' interior = 𝓝 x :=
(nhds_basis_opens x).lift'_interior_eq_self fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_interior {x : X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p (interior <| s ·) :=
lift'_nhds_interior x ▸ h.lift'_interior
theorem le_nhds_iff {f} : f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ∀ s : Set X, x ∈ s → IsOpen s → s ∈ f := by simp [nhds_def]
#align le_nhds_iff le_nhds_iff
theorem nhds_le_of_le {f} (h : x ∈ s) (o : IsOpen s) (sf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : 𝓝 x ≤ f := by
rw [nhds_def]; exact iInf₂_le_of_le s ⟨h, o⟩ sf
#align nhds_le_of_le nhds_le_of_le
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t :=
(nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.trans <| exists_congr fun _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, h.1.2, h.1.1⟩, fun h => ⟨⟨h.2.2, h.2.1⟩, h.1⟩⟩
#align mem_nhds_iff mem_nhds_iffₓ
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) ↔ ∃ t : Set X, (∀ x ∈ t, p x) ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t :=
mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [subset_def, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
#align eventually_nhds_iff eventually_nhds_iff
theorem mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds : x ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_interior.trans mem_nhds_iff.symm
#align mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds
theorem map_nhds {f : X → α} :
map f (𝓝 x) = ⨅ s ∈ { s : Set X | x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s }, 𝓟 (f '' s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds map_nhds
theorem mem_of_mem_nhds : s ∈ 𝓝 x → x ∈ s := fun H =>
let ⟨_t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 H; ht hs
#align mem_of_mem_nhds mem_of_mem_nhds
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhds {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhds h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhds
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhds (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, Subset.refl _, hs, hx⟩
#align is_open.mem_nhds IsOpen.mem_nhds
protected theorem IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨mem_of_mem_nhds, fun hx => mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hs, hx⟩⟩
#align is_open.mem_nhds_iff IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff
theorem IsClosed.compl_mem_nhds (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∉ s) : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x :=
hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds (mem_compl hx)
#align is_closed.compl_mem_nhds IsClosed.compl_mem_nhds
theorem IsOpen.eventually_mem (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds hs hx
#align is_open.eventually_mem IsOpen.eventually_mem
theorem nhds_basis_opens' (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsOpen s) fun x => x := by
convert nhds_basis_opens x using 2
exact and_congr_left_iff.2 IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff
#align nhds_basis_opens' nhds_basis_opens'
theorem exists_open_set_nhds {U : Set X} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, U ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ V : Set X, s ⊆ V ∧ IsOpen V ∧ V ⊆ U :=
⟨interior U, fun x hx => mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| h x hx, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
#align exists_open_set_nhds exists_open_set_nhds
theorem exists_open_set_nhds' {U : Set X} (h : U ∈ ⨆ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x) :
∃ V : Set X, s ⊆ V ∧ IsOpen V ∧ V ⊆ U :=
exists_open_set_nhds (by simpa using h)
#align exists_open_set_nhds' exists_open_set_nhds'
theorem Filter.Eventually.eventually_nhds {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x :=
let ⟨t, htp, hto, ha⟩ := eventually_nhds_iff.1 h
eventually_nhds_iff.2 ⟨t, fun _x hx => eventually_nhds_iff.2 ⟨t, htp, hto, hx⟩, hto, ha⟩
#align filter.eventually.eventually_nhds Filter.Eventually.eventually_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhds {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x :=
⟨fun h => h.self_of_nhds, fun h => h.eventually_nhds⟩
#align eventually_eventually_nhds eventually_eventually_nhds
@[simp]
theorem frequently_frequently_nhds {p : X → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∃ᶠ x'' in 𝓝 x', p x'') ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_frequently, eventually_eventually_nhds]
#align frequently_frequently_nhds frequently_frequently_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhds : (∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, s ∈ 𝓝 x') ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
#align eventually_mem_nhds eventually_mem_nhds
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhds : (𝓝 x).bind 𝓝 = 𝓝 x :=
Filter.ext fun _ => eventually_eventually_nhds
#align nhds_bind_nhds nhds_bind_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventuallyEq_nhds {f g : X → α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f =ᶠ[𝓝 y] g) ↔ f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
#align eventually_eventually_eq_nhds eventually_eventuallyEq_nhds
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhds {f g : X → α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : f x = g x :=
h.self_of_nhds
#align filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventuallyLE_nhds [LE α] {f g : X → α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 y] g) ↔ f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 x] g :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
#align eventually_eventually_le_nhds eventually_eventuallyLE_nhds
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eventuallyEq_nhds {f g : X → α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f =ᶠ[𝓝 y] g :=
h.eventually_nhds
#align filter.eventually_eq.eventually_eq_nhds Filter.EventuallyEq.eventuallyEq_nhds
theorem Filter.EventuallyLE.eventuallyLE_nhds [LE α] {f g : X → α} (h : f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 y] g :=
h.eventually_nhds
#align filter.eventually_le.eventually_le_nhds Filter.EventuallyLE.eventuallyLE_nhds
theorem all_mem_nhds (x : X) (P : Set X → Prop) (hP : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, P s) ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → x ∈ s → P s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).forall_iff hP).trans <| by simp only [@and_comm (x ∈ _), and_imp]
#align all_mem_nhds all_mem_nhds
theorem all_mem_nhds_filter (x : X) (f : Set X → Set α) (hf : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → f s ⊆ f t)
(l : Filter α) : (∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, f s ∈ l) ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → x ∈ s → f s ∈ l :=
all_mem_nhds _ _ fun s t ssubt h => mem_of_superset h (hf s t ssubt)
#align all_mem_nhds_filter all_mem_nhds_filter
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : α → X} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → x ∈ s → f ⁻¹' s ∈ l :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h) _
#align tendsto_nhds tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop_nhds [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {f : α → X} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x) ↔ ∀ U : Set X, x ∈ U → IsOpen U → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → f n ∈ U :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (nhds_basis_opens x)).trans <| by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, true_and_iff, mem_Ici, ge_iff_le]
#align tendsto_at_top_nhds tendsto_atTop_nhds
theorem tendsto_const_nhds {f : Filter α} : Tendsto (fun _ : α => x) f (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr fun _ _ ha => univ_mem' fun _ => ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_const_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι]
{u : ι → X} {i₀ : ι} (h : ∀ i ≥ i₀, u i = x) : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) :=
Tendsto.congr' (EventuallyEq.symm (eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨i₀, h⟩)) tendsto_const_nhds
#align tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_eventually_const {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeInf ι] [Nonempty ι]
{u : ι → X} {i₀ : ι} (h : ∀ i ≤ i₀, u i = x) : Tendsto u atBot (𝓝 x) :=
Tendsto.congr' (EventuallyEq.symm (eventually_atBot.mpr ⟨i₀, h⟩)) tendsto_const_nhds
#align tendsto_at_bot_of_eventually_const tendsto_atBot_of_eventually_const
theorem pure_le_nhds : pure ≤ (𝓝 : X → Filter X) := fun _ _ hs => mem_pure.2 <| mem_of_mem_nhds hs
#align pure_le_nhds pure_le_nhds
theorem tendsto_pure_nhds (f : α → X) (a : α) : Tendsto f (pure a) (𝓝 (f a)) :=
(tendsto_pure_pure f a).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
#align tendsto_pure_nhds tendsto_pure_nhds
theorem OrderTop.tendsto_atTop_nhds [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] (f : α → X) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 (f ⊤)) :=
(tendsto_atTop_pure f).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
#align order_top.tendsto_at_top_nhds OrderTop.tendsto_atTop_nhds
@[simp]
instance nhds_neBot : NeBot (𝓝 x) :=
neBot_of_le (pure_le_nhds x)
#align nhds_ne_bot nhds_neBot
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq {l : Filter α} {f : α → X} (h : ∀ᶠ x' in l, f x' = x) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' (.symm h)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.tendsto {l : Filter α} {f : α → X} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ x) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq hf
theorem ClusterPt.neBot {F : Filter X} (h : ClusterPt x F) : NeBot (𝓝 x ⊓ F) :=
h
#align cluster_pt.ne_bot ClusterPt.neBot
theorem Filter.HasBasis.clusterPt_iff {ιX ιF} {pX : ιX → Prop} {sX : ιX → Set X} {pF : ιF → Prop}
{sF : ιF → Set X} {F : Filter X} (hX : (𝓝 x).HasBasis pX sX) (hF : F.HasBasis pF sF) :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, pX i → ∀ ⦃j⦄, pF j → (sX i ∩ sF j).Nonempty :=
hX.inf_basis_neBot_iff hF
#align filter.has_basis.cluster_pt_iff Filter.HasBasis.clusterPt_iff
theorem clusterPt_iff {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ∀ ⦃U : Set X⦄, U ∈ 𝓝 x → ∀ ⦃V⦄, V ∈ F → (U ∩ V).Nonempty :=
inf_neBot_iff
#align cluster_pt_iff clusterPt_iff
theorem clusterPt_iff_not_disjoint {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) F := by
rw [disjoint_iff, ClusterPt, neBot_iff]
theorem clusterPt_principal_iff :
ClusterPt x (𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, (U ∩ s).Nonempty :=
inf_principal_neBot_iff
#align cluster_pt_principal_iff clusterPt_principal_iff
theorem clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently :
ClusterPt x (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s := by
simp only [clusterPt_principal_iff, frequently_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff]
#align cluster_pt_principal_iff_frequently clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently
theorem ClusterPt.of_le_nhds {f : Filter X} (H : f ≤ 𝓝 x) [NeBot f] : ClusterPt x f := by
rwa [ClusterPt, inf_eq_right.mpr H]
#align cluster_pt.of_le_nhds ClusterPt.of_le_nhds
theorem ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' {f : Filter X} (H : f ≤ 𝓝 x) (_hf : NeBot f) :
ClusterPt x f :=
ClusterPt.of_le_nhds H
#align cluster_pt.of_le_nhds' ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
theorem ClusterPt.of_nhds_le {f : Filter X} (H : 𝓝 x ≤ f) : ClusterPt x f := by
simp only [ClusterPt, inf_eq_left.mpr H, nhds_neBot]
#align cluster_pt.of_nhds_le ClusterPt.of_nhds_le
theorem ClusterPt.mono {f g : Filter X} (H : ClusterPt x f) (h : f ≤ g) : ClusterPt x g :=
NeBot.mono H <| inf_le_inf_left _ h
#align cluster_pt.mono ClusterPt.mono
theorem ClusterPt.of_inf_left {f g : Filter X} (H : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ g) : ClusterPt x f :=
H.mono inf_le_left
#align cluster_pt.of_inf_left ClusterPt.of_inf_left
theorem ClusterPt.of_inf_right {f g : Filter X} (H : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ g) :
ClusterPt x g :=
H.mono inf_le_right
#align cluster_pt.of_inf_right ClusterPt.of_inf_right
theorem Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff {f : Ultrafilter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔ ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨f.le_of_inf_neBot', fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds h⟩
#align ultrafilter.cluster_pt_iff Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff
theorem clusterPt_iff_ultrafilter {f : Filter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔
∃ u : Ultrafilter X, u ≤ f ∧ u ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [ClusterPt, ← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]
theorem mapClusterPt_def {ι : Type*} (x : X) (F : Filter ι) (u : ι → X) :
MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ClusterPt x (map u F) := Iff.rfl
theorem mapClusterPt_iff {ι : Type*} (x : X) (F : Filter ι) (u : ι → X) :
MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ᶠ a in F, u a ∈ s := by
simp_rw [MapClusterPt, ClusterPt, inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left, frequently_map]
rfl
#align map_cluster_pt_iff mapClusterPt_iff
theorem mapClusterPt_iff_ultrafilter {ι : Type*} (x : X) (F : Filter ι) (u : ι → X) :
MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ∃ U : Ultrafilter ι, U ≤ F ∧ Tendsto u U (𝓝 x) := by
simp_rw [MapClusterPt, ClusterPt, ← Filter.push_pull', map_neBot_iff, tendsto_iff_comap,
← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]
theorem mapClusterPt_comp {X α β : Type*} {x : X} [TopologicalSpace X] {F : Filter α} {φ : α → β}
{u : β → X} : MapClusterPt x F (u ∘ φ) ↔ MapClusterPt x (map φ F) u := Iff.rfl
theorem mapClusterPt_of_comp {F : Filter α} {φ : β → α} {p : Filter β}
{u : α → X} [NeBot p] (h : Tendsto φ p F) (H : Tendsto (u ∘ φ) p (𝓝 x)) :
MapClusterPt x F u := by
have :=
calc
map (u ∘ φ) p = map u (map φ p) := map_map
_ ≤ map u F := map_mono h
have : map (u ∘ φ) p ≤ 𝓝 x ⊓ map u F := le_inf H this
exact neBot_of_le this
#align map_cluster_pt_of_comp mapClusterPt_of_comp
theorem acc_iff_cluster (x : X) (F : Filter X) : AccPt x F ↔ ClusterPt x (𝓟 {x}ᶜ ⊓ F) := by
rw [AccPt, nhdsWithin, ClusterPt, inf_assoc]
#align acc_iff_cluster acc_iff_cluster
theorem acc_principal_iff_cluster (x : X) (C : Set X) :
AccPt x (𝓟 C) ↔ ClusterPt x (𝓟 (C \ {x})) := by
rw [acc_iff_cluster, inf_principal, inter_comm, diff_eq]
#align acc_principal_iff_cluster acc_principal_iff_cluster
theorem accPt_iff_nhds (x : X) (C : Set X) : AccPt x (𝓟 C) ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ y ∈ U ∩ C, y ≠ x := by
simp [acc_principal_iff_cluster, clusterPt_principal_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, and_assoc,
@and_comm (¬_ = x)]
#align acc_pt_iff_nhds accPt_iff_nhds
theorem accPt_iff_frequently (x : X) (C : Set X) : AccPt x (𝓟 C) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ≠ x ∧ y ∈ C := by
simp [acc_principal_iff_cluster, clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently, and_comm]
#align acc_pt_iff_frequently accPt_iff_frequently
theorem AccPt.mono {F G : Filter X} (h : AccPt x F) (hFG : F ≤ G) : AccPt x G :=
NeBot.mono h (inf_le_inf_left _ hFG)
#align acc_pt.mono AccPt.mono
theorem interior_eq_nhds' : interior s = { x | s ∈ 𝓝 x } :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_interior, mem_nhds_iff, mem_setOf_eq]
#align interior_eq_nhds' interior_eq_nhds'
theorem interior_eq_nhds : interior s = { x | 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓟 s } :=
interior_eq_nhds'.trans <| by simp only [le_principal_iff]
#align interior_eq_nhds interior_eq_nhds
@[simp]
theorem interior_mem_nhds : interior s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
⟨fun h => mem_of_superset h interior_subset, fun h =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_interior (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 h)⟩
#align interior_mem_nhds interior_mem_nhds
theorem interior_setOf_eq {p : X → Prop} : interior { x | p x } = { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y } :=
interior_eq_nhds'
#align interior_set_of_eq interior_setOf_eq
theorem isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhds {p : X → Prop} : IsOpen { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y } := by
simp only [← interior_setOf_eq, isOpen_interior]
#align is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhds
theorem subset_interior_iff_nhds {V : Set X} : s ⊆ interior V ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, V ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
#align subset_interior_iff_nhds subset_interior_iff_nhds
theorem isOpen_iff_nhds : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓟 s :=
calc
IsOpen s ↔ s ⊆ interior s := subset_interior_iff_isOpen.symm
_ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓟 s := by simp_rw [interior_eq_nhds, subset_def, mem_setOf]
#align is_open_iff_nhds isOpen_iff_nhds
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_nhds {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ x, @nhds _ t x = @nhds _ t' x :=
⟨fun H x ↦ congrFun (congrArg _ H) _, fun H ↦ by ext; simp_rw [@isOpen_iff_nhds _ _ _, H]⟩
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_nhds
theorem isOpen_iff_mem_nhds : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_iff_nhds.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr_right fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align is_open_iff_mem_nhds isOpen_iff_mem_nhds
theorem isOpen_iff_eventually : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds
#align is_open_iff_eventually isOpen_iff_eventually
theorem isOpen_iff_ultrafilter :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ (l : Ultrafilter X), ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ l := by
simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, ← mem_iff_ultrafilter]
#align is_open_iff_ultrafilter isOpen_iff_ultrafilter
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure (x : X) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) ↔ 𝓝 x = pure x := by
constructor
· intro h
apply le_antisymm _ (pure_le_nhds x)
rw [le_pure_iff]
exact h.mem_nhds (mem_singleton x)
· intro h
simp [isOpen_iff_nhds, h]
#align is_open_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds (x : X) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) ↔ 𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ := by
rw [isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure, nhdsWithin, ← mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, ← le_pure_iff,
nhds_neBot.le_pure_iff]
#align is_open_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds
theorem mem_closure_iff_frequently : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s := by
rw [Filter.Frequently, Filter.Eventually, ← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds,
closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, mem_compl_iff, compl_def]
#align mem_closure_iff_frequently mem_closure_iff_frequently
alias ⟨_, Filter.Frequently.mem_closure⟩ := mem_closure_iff_frequently
#align filter.frequently.mem_closure Filter.Frequently.mem_closure
theorem isClosed_iff_frequently : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ x, (∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s) → x ∈ s := by
rw [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
rw [mem_closure_iff_frequently]
#align is_closed_iff_frequently isClosed_iff_frequently
theorem isClosed_setOf_clusterPt {f : Filter X} : IsClosed { x | ClusterPt x f } := by
simp only [ClusterPt, inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left, setOf_forall, imp_iff_not_or]
refine isClosed_iInter fun p => IsClosed.union ?_ ?_ <;> apply isClosed_compl_iff.2
exacts [isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhds, isOpen_const]
#align is_closed_set_of_cluster_pt isClosed_setOf_clusterPt
theorem mem_closure_iff_clusterPt : x ∈ closure s ↔ ClusterPt x (𝓟 s) :=
mem_closure_iff_frequently.trans clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently.symm
#align mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt mem_closure_iff_clusterPt
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot : x ∈ closure s ↔ 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 s ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.trans neBot_iff
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias mem_closure_iff_nhds_neBot := mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot : x ∈ closure s ↔ NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot
lemma not_mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_eq_bot : x ∉ closure s ↔ 𝓝[s] x = ⊥ := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot]
theorem dense_compl_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) := by
intro y
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot]
· exact subset_closure hne
#align dense_compl_singleton dense_compl_singleton
-- Porting note (#10618): was a `@[simp]` lemma but `simp` can prove it
theorem closure_compl_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : closure {x}ᶜ = (univ : Set X) :=
(dense_compl_singleton x).closure_eq
#align closure_compl_singleton closure_compl_singleton
@[simp]
theorem interior_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : interior {x} = (∅ : Set X) :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 (dense_compl_singleton x)
#align interior_singleton interior_singleton
theorem not_isOpen_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) :=
dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open.1 (dense_compl_singleton x)
#align not_is_open_singleton not_isOpen_singleton
theorem closure_eq_cluster_pts : closure s = { a | ClusterPt a (𝓟 s) } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_iff_clusterPt
#align closure_eq_cluster_pts closure_eq_cluster_pts
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 x, (t ∩ s).Nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.trans clusterPt_principal_iff
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds mem_closure_iff_nhds
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds' : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ y : s, ↑y ∈ t := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhds, Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right, SetCoe.exists, exists_prop]
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds' mem_closure_iff_nhds'
theorem mem_closure_iff_comap_neBot :
x ∈ closure s ↔ NeBot (comap ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x)) := by
simp_rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds, comap_neBot_iff, Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right,
SetCoe.exists, exists_prop]
#align mem_closure_iff_comap_ne_bot mem_closure_iff_comap_neBot
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} (h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) :
x ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → (s i ∩ t).Nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.trans <|
(h.clusterPt_iff (hasBasis_principal _)).trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, forall_const]
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis'
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} (h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) :
x ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ y ∈ t, y ∈ s i :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' h).trans <| by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop, and_comm]
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis
theorem clusterPt_iff_forall_mem_closure {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ∀ s ∈ F, x ∈ closure s := by
simp_rw [ClusterPt, inf_neBot_iff, mem_closure_iff_nhds]
rw [forall₂_swap]
theorem clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ pure x ≤ (F.lift' closure) := by
simp_rw [clusterPt_iff_forall_mem_closure,
(hasBasis_pure _).le_basis_iff F.basis_sets.lift'_closure, id, singleton_subset_iff, true_and,
exists_const]
theorem clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure' {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ (F.lift' closure ⊓ pure x).NeBot := by
rw [clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure, ← Ultrafilter.coe_pure, inf_comm, Ultrafilter.inf_neBot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem clusterPt_lift'_closure_iff {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x (F.lift' closure) ↔ ClusterPt x F := by
simp [clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure, lift'_lift'_assoc (monotone_closure X) (monotone_closure X)]
theorem mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ u : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ u ∧ ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_comm]
#align mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter
theorem isClosed_iff_clusterPt : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ a, ClusterPt a (𝓟 s) → a ∈ s :=
calc
IsClosed s ↔ closure s ⊆ s := closure_subset_iff_isClosed.symm
_ ↔ ∀ a, ClusterPt a (𝓟 s) → a ∈ s := by simp only [subset_def, mem_closure_iff_clusterPt]
#align is_closed_iff_cluster_pt isClosed_iff_clusterPt
theorem isClosed_iff_ultrafilter : IsClosed s ↔
∀ x, ∀ u : Ultrafilter X, ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ u → x ∈ s := by
simp [isClosed_iff_clusterPt, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff]
theorem isClosed_iff_nhds :
IsClosed s ↔ ∀ x, (∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, (U ∩ s).Nonempty) → x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [isClosed_iff_clusterPt, ClusterPt, inf_principal_neBot_iff]
#align is_closed_iff_nhds isClosed_iff_nhds
lemma isClosed_iff_forall_filter :
IsClosed s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ F : Filter X, F.NeBot → F ≤ 𝓟 s → F ≤ 𝓝 x → x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [isClosed_iff_clusterPt]
exact ⟨fun hs x F F_ne FS Fx ↦ hs _ <| NeBot.mono F_ne (le_inf Fx FS),
fun hs x hx ↦ hs x (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 s) hx inf_le_right inf_le_left⟩
theorem IsClosed.interior_union_left (_ : IsClosed s) :
interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s ∪ interior t := fun a ⟨u, ⟨⟨hu₁, hu₂⟩, ha⟩⟩ =>
(Classical.em (a ∈ s)).imp_right fun h =>
mem_interior.mpr
⟨u ∩ sᶜ, fun _x hx => (hu₂ hx.1).resolve_left hx.2, IsOpen.inter hu₁ IsClosed.isOpen_compl,
⟨ha, h⟩⟩
#align is_closed.interior_union_left IsClosed.interior_union_left
theorem IsClosed.interior_union_right (h : IsClosed t) :
interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ interior s ∪ t := by
simpa only [union_comm _ t] using h.interior_union_left
#align is_closed.interior_union_right IsClosed.interior_union_right
theorem IsOpen.inter_closure (h : IsOpen s) : s ∩ closure t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
compl_subset_compl.mp <| by
simpa only [← interior_compl, compl_inter] using IsClosed.interior_union_left h.isClosed_compl
#align is_open.inter_closure IsOpen.inter_closure
theorem IsOpen.closure_inter (h : IsOpen t) : closure s ∩ t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using h.inter_closure
#align is_open.closure_inter IsOpen.closure_inter
theorem Dense.open_subset_closure_inter (hs : Dense s) (ht : IsOpen t) :
t ⊆ closure (t ∩ s) :=
calc
t = t ∩ closure s := by rw [hs.closure_eq, inter_univ]
_ ⊆ closure (t ∩ s) := ht.inter_closure
#align dense.open_subset_closure_inter Dense.open_subset_closure_inter
theorem mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union (h : x ∈ closure (s₁ ∪ s₂))
(h₁ : s₁ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x) : x ∈ closure s₂ := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot] at *
rwa [← sup_principal, inf_sup_left, inf_principal_eq_bot.mpr h₁, bot_sup_eq] at h
#align mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union
theorem Dense.inter_of_isOpen_left (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) (hso : IsOpen s) :
Dense (s ∩ t) := fun x =>
closure_minimal hso.inter_closure isClosed_closure <| by simp [hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
#align dense.inter_of_open_left Dense.inter_of_isOpen_left
theorem Dense.inter_of_isOpen_right (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) (hto : IsOpen t) :
Dense (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_of_isOpen_left hs hto
#align dense.inter_of_open_right Dense.inter_of_isOpen_right
theorem Dense.inter_nhds_nonempty (hs : Dense s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨U, hsub, ho, hx⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 ht
(hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho ⟨x, hx⟩).mono fun _y hy => ⟨hy.2, hsub hy.1⟩
#align dense.inter_nhds_nonempty Dense.inter_nhds_nonempty
theorem closure_diff : closure s \ closure t ⊆ closure (s \ t) :=
calc
closure s \ closure t = (closure t)ᶜ ∩ closure s := by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
_ ⊆ closure ((closure t)ᶜ ∩ s) := (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr <| isClosed_closure).inter_closure
_ = closure (s \ closure t) := by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
_ ⊆ closure (s \ t) := closure_mono <| diff_subset_diff (Subset.refl s) subset_closure
#align closure_diff closure_diff
theorem Filter.Frequently.mem_of_closed (h : ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s)
(hs : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_subset h.mem_closure
#align filter.frequently.mem_of_closed Filter.Frequently.mem_of_closed
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α}
(hs : IsClosed s) (h : ∃ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) : x ∈ s :=
(hf.frequently <| show ∃ᶠ x in b, (fun y => y ∈ s) (f x) from h).mem_of_closed hs
#align is_closed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto IsClosed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α} [NeBot b]
(hs : IsClosed s) (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hs.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h.frequently hf
#align is_closed.mem_of_tendsto IsClosed.mem_of_tendsto
theorem mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) : x ∈ closure s :=
(hf.frequently h).mem_closure
#align mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto
theorem mem_closure_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α} [NeBot b]
(hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : x ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto h.frequently hf
#align mem_closure_of_tendsto mem_closure_of_tendsto
theorem tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq {f : α → X} {l : Filter α} {s : Set α}
(h : ∀ a ∉ s, f a = x) : Tendsto f (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_comap, tendsto_iff_comap]
replace h : 𝓟 sᶜ ≤ comap f (𝓝 x) := by
rintro U ⟨t, ht, htU⟩ x hx
have : f x ∈ t := (h x hx).symm ▸ mem_of_mem_nhds ht
exact htU this
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, le_trans inf_le_left⟩
have := sup_le h' h
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ, inf_top_eq, sup_le_iff]
at this
exact this.1
#align tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq
open Topology
section Continuous
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
open TopologicalSpace
-- The curly braces are intentional, so this definition works well with simp
-- when topologies are not those provided by instances.
theorem continuous_def {_ : TopologicalSpace X} {_ : TopologicalSpace Y} {f : X → Y} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨fun hf => hf.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align continuous_def continuous_def
variable {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {x : X} {y : Y}
theorem IsOpen.preimage (hf : Continuous f) {t : Set Y} (h : IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf.isOpen_preimage t h
#align is_open.preimage IsOpen.preimage
theorem continuous_congr {g : X → Y} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous g :=
.of_eq <| congrArg _ <| funext h
theorem Continuous.congr {g : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (h' : ∀ x, f x = g x) : Continuous g :=
continuous_congr h' |>.mp h
#align continuous.congr Continuous.congr
theorem ContinuousAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
#align continuous_at.tendsto ContinuousAt.tendsto
theorem continuousAt_def : ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ A ∈ 𝓝 (f x), f ⁻¹' A ∈ 𝓝 x :=
Iff.rfl
#align continuous_at_def continuousAt_def
theorem continuousAt_congr {g : X → Y} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt g x := by
simp only [ContinuousAt, tendsto_congr' h, h.eq_of_nhds]
#align continuous_at_congr continuousAt_congr
theorem ContinuousAt.congr {g : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
ContinuousAt g x :=
(continuousAt_congr h).1 hf
#align continuous_at.congr ContinuousAt.congr
theorem ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds {t : Set Y} (h : ContinuousAt f x)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 x :=
h ht
#align continuous_at.preimage_mem_nhds ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds
theorem ContinuousAt.eventually_mem {f : X → Y} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) {s : Set Y}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y ∈ s :=
hf hs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-15")]
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,563 | 1,567 | theorem eventuallyEq_zero_nhds {M₀} [Zero M₀] {f : X → M₀} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 0 ↔ x ∉ closure (Function.support f) := by |
rw [← mem_compl_iff, ← interior_compl, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, Function.compl_support,
EventuallyEq, eventually_iff]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates_le Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates_le
theorem head_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (head s) :=
get?_terminates_le (Nat.zero_le n)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates {s : WSeq α} {n} (T : Terminates (get? s n)) :
Terminates (destruct s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).1 <| head_terminates_of_get?_terminates T
#align stream.wseq.destruct_terminates_of_nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.destruct_terminates_of_get?_terminates
theorem mem_rec_on {C : WSeq α → Prop} {a s} (M : a ∈ s) (h1 : ∀ b s', a = b ∨ C s' → C (cons b s'))
(h2 : ∀ s, C s → C (think s)) : C s := by
apply Seq.mem_rec_on M
intro o s' h; cases' o with b
· apply h2
cases h
· contradiction
· assumption
· apply h1
apply Or.imp_left _ h
intro h
injection h
#align stream.wseq.mem_rec_on Stream'.WSeq.mem_rec_on
@[simp]
theorem mem_think (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ think s ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases' s with f al
change (some (some a) ∈ some none::f) ↔ some (some a) ∈ f
constructor <;> intro h
· apply (Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h).resolve_left
intro
injections
· apply Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ h
#align stream.wseq.mem_think Stream'.WSeq.mem_think
theorem eq_or_mem_iff_mem {s : WSeq α} {a a' s'} :
some (a', s') ∈ destruct s → (a ∈ s ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ s') := by
generalize e : destruct s = c; intro h
revert s
apply Computation.memRecOn h <;> [skip; intro c IH] <;> intro s <;>
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
intro m <;>
have := congr_arg Computation.destruct m <;>
simp at this
· cases' this with i1 i2
rw [i1, i2]
cases' s' with f al
dsimp only [cons, (· ∈ ·), WSeq.Mem, Seq.Mem, Seq.cons]
have h_a_eq_a' : a = a' ↔ some (some a) = some (some a') := by simp
rw [h_a_eq_a']
refine ⟨Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons, fun o => ?_⟩
· cases' o with e m
· rw [e]
apply Stream'.mem_cons
· exact Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· simp [IH this]
#align stream.wseq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem Stream'.WSeq.eq_or_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons_iff (s : WSeq α) (b) {a} : a ∈ cons b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
eq_or_mem_iff_mem <| by simp [ret_mem]
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_iff Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_iff
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {s : WSeq α} (b) {a} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inr h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem mem_cons (s : WSeq α) (a) : a ∈ cons a s :=
(mem_cons_iff _ _).2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align stream.wseq.mem_cons Stream'.WSeq.mem_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_tail {s : WSeq α} {a} : a ∈ tail s → a ∈ s := by
intro h; have := h; cases' h with n e; revert s; simp only [Stream'.get]
induction' n with n IH <;> intro s <;> induction' s using WSeq.recOn with x s s <;>
simp <;> intro m e <;>
injections
· exact Or.inr m
· exact Or.inr m
· apply IH m
rw [e]
cases tail s
rfl
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_tail Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_tail
theorem mem_of_mem_dropn {s : WSeq α} {a} : ∀ {n}, a ∈ drop s n → a ∈ s
| 0, h => h
| n + 1, h => @mem_of_mem_dropn s a n (mem_of_mem_tail h)
#align stream.wseq.mem_of_mem_dropn Stream'.WSeq.mem_of_mem_dropn
theorem get?_mem {s : WSeq α} {a n} : some a ∈ get? s n → a ∈ s := by
revert s; induction' n with n IH <;> intro s h
· -- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, h1, h2⟩
cases' o with o
· injection h2
injection h2 with h'
cases' o with a' s'
exact (eq_or_mem_iff_mem h1).2 (Or.inl h'.symm)
· have := @IH (tail s)
rw [get?_tail] at this
exact mem_of_mem_tail (this h)
#align stream.wseq.nth_mem Stream'.WSeq.get?_mem
theorem exists_get?_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : ∃ n, some a ∈ get? s n := by
apply mem_rec_on h
· intro a' s' h
cases' h with h h
· exists 0
simp only [get?, drop, head_cons]
rw [h]
apply ret_mem
· cases' h with n h
exists n + 1
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [get?]`.
simpa [get?]
· intro s' h
cases' h with n h
exists n
simp only [get?, dropn_think, head_think]
apply think_mem h
#align stream.wseq.exists_nth_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_get?_of_mem
theorem exists_dropn_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ n s', some (a, s') ∈ destruct (drop s n) :=
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
⟨n, by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ with ⟨⟨o, om⟩⟩
have := Computation.mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ om) h
cases' o with o
· injection this
injection this with i
cases' o with a' s'
dsimp at i
rw [i] at om
exact ⟨_, om⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_dropn_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.exists_dropn_of_mem
theorem liftRel_dropn_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) :
∀ n, Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct (drop s n)) (destruct (drop t n))
| 0 => liftRel_destruct H
| n + 1 => by
simp only [LiftRelO, drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, destruct_tail, tail.aux]
apply liftRel_bind
· apply liftRel_dropn_destruct H n
exact fun {a b} o =>
match a, b, o with
| none, none, _ => by
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
| some (a, s), some (b, t), ⟨_, h2⟩ => by simpa [tail.aux] using liftRel_destruct h2
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_dropn_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_dropn_destruct
theorem exists_of_liftRel_left {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {a} (h : a ∈ s) :
∃ b, b ∈ t ∧ R a b := by
let ⟨n, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
-- Porting note: This line is required to infer metavariables in
-- `Computation.exists_of_mem_map`.
dsimp only [get?, head] at h
let ⟨some (_, s'), sd, rfl⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h
let ⟨some (b, t'), td, ⟨ab, _⟩⟩ := (liftRel_dropn_destruct H n).left sd
exact ⟨b, get?_mem (Computation.mem_map (Prod.fst.{v, v} <$> ·) td), ab⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_left Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_left
theorem exists_of_liftRel_right {R : α → β → Prop} {s t} (H : LiftRel R s t) {b} (h : b ∈ t) :
∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ R a b := by rw [← LiftRel.swap] at H; exact exists_of_liftRel_left H h
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_lift_rel_right Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_liftRel_right
theorem head_terminates_of_mem {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : a ∈ s) : Terminates (head s) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem h
head_terminates_of_get?_terminates ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_mem Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_mem
theorem of_mem_append {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ append s₁ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ :=
Seq.of_mem_append
#align stream.wseq.of_mem_append Stream'.WSeq.of_mem_append
theorem mem_append_left {s₁ s₂ : WSeq α} {a : α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ append s₁ s₂ :=
Seq.mem_append_left
#align stream.wseq.mem_append_left Stream'.WSeq.mem_append_left
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} : ∀ {s : WSeq α}, b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b
| ⟨g, al⟩, h => by
let ⟨o, om, oe⟩ := Seq.exists_of_mem_map h
cases' o with a
· injection oe
injection oe with h'
exact ⟨a, om, h'⟩
#align stream.wseq.exists_of_mem_map Stream'.WSeq.exists_of_mem_map
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_nil (R : α → β → Prop) : LiftRel R nil nil := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_nil Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_nil
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_cons (R : α → β → Prop) (a b s t) :
LiftRel R (cons a s) (cons b t) ↔ R a b ∧ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff]
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [-liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_cons Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_cons
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_left (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R (think s) t ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_left Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_left
@[simp]
theorem liftRel_think_right (R : α → β → Prop) (s t) : LiftRel R s (think t) ↔ LiftRel R s t := by
rw [liftRel_destruct_iff, liftRel_destruct_iff]; simp
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_think_right Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_think_right
theorem cons_congr {s t : WSeq α} (a : α) (h : s ~ʷ t) : cons a s ~ʷ cons a t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.cons_congr Stream'.WSeq.cons_congr
theorem think_equiv (s : WSeq α) : think s ~ʷ s := by unfold Equiv; simpa using Equiv.refl _
#align stream.wseq.think_equiv Stream'.WSeq.think_equiv
theorem think_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : think s ~ʷ think t := by
unfold Equiv; simpa using h
#align stream.wseq.think_congr Stream'.WSeq.think_congr
theorem head_congr : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → head s ~ head t := by
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → ∀ {o}, o ∈ head s → o ∈ head t from fun s t h o =>
⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
intro s t h o ho
rcases @Computation.exists_of_mem_map _ _ _ _ (destruct s) ho with ⟨ds, dsm, dse⟩
rw [← dse]
cases' destruct_congr h with l r
rcases l dsm with ⟨dt, dtm, dst⟩
cases' ds with a <;> cases' dt with b
· apply Computation.mem_map _ dtm
· cases b
cases dst
· cases a
cases dst
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
rw [dst.left]
exact @Computation.mem_map _ _ (@Functor.map _ _ (α × WSeq α) _ Prod.fst)
(some (b, t')) (destruct t) dtm
#align stream.wseq.head_congr Stream'.WSeq.head_congr
theorem flatten_equiv {c : Computation (WSeq α)} {s} (h : s ∈ c) : flatten c ~ʷ s := by
apply Computation.memRecOn h
· simp [Equiv.refl]
· intro s'
apply Equiv.trans
simp [think_equiv]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_equiv Stream'.WSeq.flatten_equiv
theorem liftRel_flatten {R : α → β → Prop} {c1 : Computation (WSeq α)} {c2 : Computation (WSeq β)}
(h : c1.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c2) : LiftRel R (flatten c1) (flatten c2) :=
let S s t := ∃ c1 c2, s = flatten c1 ∧ t = flatten c2 ∧ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRel R) c1 c2
⟨S, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩, fun {s t} h =>
match s, t, h with
| _, _, ⟨c1, c2, rfl, rfl, h⟩ => by
simp only [destruct_flatten]; apply liftRel_bind _ _ h
intro a b ab; apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ (liftRel_destruct ab)
intro a b; apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t h; refine ⟨Computation.pure s, Computation.pure t, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
-- Porting note: These 2 theorems should be excluded.
simp [h, -liftRel_pure_left, -liftRel_pure_right]⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_flatten Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_flatten
theorem flatten_congr {c1 c2 : Computation (WSeq α)} :
Computation.LiftRel Equiv c1 c2 → flatten c1 ~ʷ flatten c2 :=
liftRel_flatten
#align stream.wseq.flatten_congr Stream'.WSeq.flatten_congr
theorem tail_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : tail s ~ʷ tail t := by
apply flatten_congr
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]; rw [← Computation.bind_pure, ← Computation.bind_pure]
apply liftRel_bind _ _ (destruct_congr h)
intro a b h; simp only [comp_apply, liftRel_pure]
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· cases h
· cases a
cases h
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
exact h.right
#align stream.wseq.tail_congr Stream'.WSeq.tail_congr
theorem dropn_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : drop s n ~ʷ drop t n := by
induction n <;> simp [*, tail_congr, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_congr Stream'.WSeq.dropn_congr
theorem get?_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (n) : get? s n ~ get? t n :=
head_congr (dropn_congr h _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_congr Stream'.WSeq.get?_congr
theorem mem_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) (a) : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ t :=
suffices ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → a ∈ s → a ∈ t from ⟨this h, this h.symm⟩
fun {_ _} h as =>
let ⟨_, hn⟩ := exists_get?_of_mem as
get?_mem ((get?_congr h _ _).1 hn)
#align stream.wseq.mem_congr Stream'.WSeq.mem_congr
theorem productive_congr {s t : WSeq α} (h : s ~ʷ t) : Productive s ↔ Productive t := by
simp only [productive_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun n => terminates_congr <| get?_congr h _
#align stream.wseq.productive_congr Stream'.WSeq.productive_congr
theorem Equiv.ext {s t : WSeq α} (h : ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n) : s ~ʷ t :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ n, get? s n ~ get? t n, h, fun {s t} h => by
refine liftRel_def.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← head_terminates_iff, ← head_terminates_iff]
exact terminates_congr (h 0)
· intro a b ma mb
cases' a with a <;> cases' b with b
· trivial
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb))
· cases' a with a s'
cases' b with b t'
injection mem_unique (Computation.mem_map _ ma) ((h 0 _).2 (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) with
ab
refine ⟨ab, fun n => ?_⟩
refine
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ ma)) n).symm.trans
((?_ : get? (tail s) n ~ get? (tail t) n).trans
(get?_congr (flatten_equiv (Computation.mem_map _ mb)) n))
rw [get?_tail, get?_tail]
apply h⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.ext Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.ext
theorem length_eq_map (s : WSeq α) : length s = Computation.map List.length (toList s) := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s')) (l.length, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map List.length (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l, s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l, s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.length_eq_map Stream'.WSeq.length_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList [] = (nil : WSeq α) :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.of_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.ofList_nil
@[simp]
theorem ofList_cons (a : α) (l) : ofList (a::l) = cons a (ofList l) :=
show Seq.map some (Seq.ofList (a::l)) = Seq.cons (some a) (Seq.map some (Seq.ofList l)) by simp
#align stream.wseq.of_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.ofList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_nil (l : List α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, nil) = Computation.pure l.reverse :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList'_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList'_cons (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) (a : α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, cons a s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (a::l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, cons]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList'_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList'_think (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, think s) =
(Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l, s)).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by simp [toList, think]
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_think Stream'.WSeq.toList'_think
theorem toList'_map (l : List α) (s : WSeq α) :
Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a :: l, s')) (l, s) = (l.reverse ++ ·) <$> toList s := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 =>
∃ (l' : List α) (s : WSeq α),
c1 = Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l' ++ l, s) ∧
c2 = Computation.map (l.reverse ++ ·) (Computation.corec (fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s')) (l', s)))
?_ ⟨[], s, rfl, rfl⟩
intro s1 s2 h; rcases h with ⟨l', s, h⟩; rw [h.left, h.right]
induction' s using WSeq.recOn with a s s <;> simp [toList, nil, cons, think, length]
· refine ⟨a::l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
· refine ⟨l', s, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.to_list'_map Stream'.WSeq.toList'_map
@[simp]
theorem toList_cons (a : α) (s) : toList (cons a s) = (List.cons a <$> toList s).think :=
destruct_eq_think <| by
unfold toList
simp only [toList'_cons, Computation.destruct_think, Sum.inr.injEq]
rw [toList'_map]
simp only [List.reverse_cons, List.reverse_nil, List.nil_append, List.singleton_append]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_cons Stream'.WSeq.toList_cons
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure [] :=
destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.to_list_nil Stream'.WSeq.toList_nil
theorem toList_ofList (l : List α) : l ∈ toList (ofList l) := by
induction' l with a l IH <;> simp [ret_mem]; exact think_mem (Computation.mem_map _ IH)
#align stream.wseq.to_list_of_list Stream'.WSeq.toList_ofList
@[simp]
theorem destruct_ofSeq (s : Seq α) :
destruct (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure (s.head.map fun a => (a, ofSeq s.tail)) :=
destruct_eq_pure <| by
simp only [destruct, Seq.destruct, Option.map_eq_map, ofSeq, Computation.corec_eq, rmap,
Seq.head]
rw [show Seq.get? (some <$> s) 0 = some <$> Seq.get? s 0 by apply Seq.map_get?]
cases' Seq.get? s 0 with a
· rfl
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [destruct]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.destruct_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem head_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : head (ofSeq s) = Computation.pure s.head := by
simp only [head, Option.map_eq_map, destruct_ofSeq, Computation.map_pure, Option.map_map]
cases Seq.head s <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.head_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.head_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : tail (ofSeq s) = ofSeq s.tail := by
simp only [tail, destruct_ofSeq, map_pure', flatten_pure]
induction' s using Seq.recOn with x s <;> simp only [ofSeq, Seq.tail_nil, Seq.head_nil,
Option.map_none', Seq.tail_cons, Seq.head_cons, Option.map_some']
· rfl
#align stream.wseq.tail_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.tail_ofSeq
@[simp]
theorem dropn_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : ∀ n, drop (ofSeq s) n = ofSeq (s.drop n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
simp only [drop, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, Seq.drop]
rw [dropn_ofSeq s n, tail_ofSeq]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.dropn_ofSeq
theorem get?_ofSeq (s : Seq α) (n) : get? (ofSeq s) n = Computation.pure (Seq.get? s n) := by
dsimp [get?]; rw [dropn_ofSeq, head_ofSeq, Seq.head_dropn]
#align stream.wseq.nth_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.get?_ofSeq
instance productive_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : Productive (ofSeq s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_ofSeq]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.productive_ofSeq
theorem toSeq_ofSeq (s : Seq α) : toSeq (ofSeq s) = s := by
apply Subtype.eq; funext n
dsimp [toSeq]; apply get_eq_of_mem
rw [get?_ofSeq]; apply ret_mem
#align stream.wseq.to_seq_of_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq_ofSeq
def ret (a : α) : WSeq α :=
ofList [a]
#align stream.wseq.ret Stream'.WSeq.ret
@[simp]
theorem map_nil (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
#align stream.wseq.map_nil Stream'.WSeq.map_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (cons a s) = cons (f a) (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_cons Stream'.WSeq.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_think (f : α → β) (s) : map f (think s) = think (map f s) :=
Seq.map_cons _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.map_think Stream'.WSeq.map_think
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 1,419 | 1,419 | theorem map_id (s : WSeq α) : map id s = s := by | simp [map]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory.Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
noncomputable
def Measure.withDensity {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ) (by simp) fun s hs hd =>
lintegral_iUnion hs hd _
#align measure_theory.measure.with_density MeasureTheory.Measure.withDensity
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_apply (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
Measure.ofMeasurable_apply s hs
#align measure_theory.with_density_apply MeasureTheory.withDensity_apply
theorem withDensity_apply_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ μ.withDensity f s := by
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
calc
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_set (subset_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)
_ = μ.withDensity f t :=
(withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)).symm
_ = μ.withDensity f s := measure_toMeasurable s
theorem withDensity_apply' [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (withDensity_apply_le f s)
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
μ.withDensity f s ≤ μ.withDensity f t := measure_mono (subset_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by congr 1; exact restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite s
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero_left (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : (0 : Measure α).withDensity f = 0 := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
simp
theorem withDensity_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f = μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae h)
#align measure_theory.with_density_congr_ae MeasureTheory.withDensity_congr_ae
lemma withDensity_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f ≤ μ.withDensity g := by
refine le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
refine set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x h_le using fun _ ↦ h_le
theorem withDensity_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.add_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs,
← lintegral_add_left hf]
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
#align measure_theory.with_density_add_left MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_left
theorem withDensity_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
simpa only [add_comm] using withDensity_add_left hg f
#align measure_theory.with_density_add_right MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_right
theorem withDensity_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ + ν).withDensity f = μ.withDensity f + ν.withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_add, lintegral_add_measure, Measure.add_apply]
#align measure_theory.with_density_add_measure MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_measure
theorem withDensity_sum {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : ι → Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(sum μ).withDensity f = sum fun n => (μ n).withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_sum μ hs, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align measure_theory.with_density_sum MeasureTheory.withDensity_sum
theorem withDensity_smul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul r hf]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.with_density_smul MeasureTheory.withDensity_smul
theorem withDensity_smul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.with_density_smul' MeasureTheory.withDensity_smul'
theorem withDensity_smul_measure (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(r • μ).withDensity f = r • μ.withDensity f := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, set_lintegral_smul_measure]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity f) :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top := by
rwa [withDensity_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_univ, lt_top_iff_ne_top] }
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_with_density MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_withDensity
theorem withDensity_absolutelyContinuous {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity f ≪ μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs₁ hs₂ => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs₁]
exact set_lintegral_measure_zero _ _ hs₂
#align measure_theory.with_density_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_zero : μ.withDensity 0 = 0 := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
#align measure_theory.with_density_zero MeasureTheory.withDensity_zero
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_one : μ.withDensity 1 = μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
#align measure_theory.with_density_one MeasureTheory.withDensity_one
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : μ.withDensity (fun _ ↦ c) = c • μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
theorem withDensity_tsum {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, Measurable (f i)) :
μ.withDensity (∑' n, f n) = sum fun n => μ.withDensity (f n) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
change ∫⁻ x in s, (∑' n, f n) x ∂μ = ∑' i : ℕ, ∫⁻ x, f i x ∂μ.restrict s
rw [← lintegral_tsum fun i => (h i).aemeasurable]
exact lintegral_congr fun x => tsum_apply (Pi.summable.2 fun _ => ENNReal.summable)
#align measure_theory.with_density_tsum MeasureTheory.withDensity_tsum
theorem withDensity_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator f) = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [withDensity_apply _ ht, lintegral_indicator _ hs, restrict_comm hs, ←
withDensity_apply _ ht]
#align measure_theory.with_density_indicator MeasureTheory.withDensity_indicator
theorem withDensity_indicator_one {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator 1) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [withDensity_indicator hs, withDensity_one]
#align measure_theory.with_density_indicator_one MeasureTheory.withDensity_indicator_one
theorem withDensity_ofReal_mutuallySingular {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) ⟂ₘ
μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| -f x := by
set S : Set α := { x | f x < 0 }
have hS : MeasurableSet S := measurableSet_lt hf measurable_const
refine ⟨S, hS, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact (ae_restrict_mem hS).mono fun x hx => ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (le_of_lt hx)
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS.compl, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.neg.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact
(ae_restrict_mem hS.compl).mono fun x hx =>
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (not_lt.1 <| mt neg_pos.1 hx)
#align measure_theory.with_density_of_real_mutually_singular MeasureTheory.withDensity_ofReal_mutuallySingular
theorem restrict_withDensity {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply _ (ht.inter hs),
restrict_restrict ht]
#align measure_theory.restrict_with_density MeasureTheory.restrict_withDensity
theorem restrict_withDensity' [SFinite μ] (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply' _ (t ∩ s),
restrict_restrict ht]
lemma trim_withDensity {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable[m] f) :
(μ.withDensity f).trim hm = (μ.trim hm).withDensity f := by
refine @Measure.ext _ m _ _ (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, restrict_trim _ _ hs, lintegral_trim _ hf, trim_measurableSet_eq _ hs,
withDensity_apply _ (hm s hs)]
lemma Measure.MutuallySingular.withDensity {ν : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ ⟂ₘ ν) :
μ.withDensity f ⟂ₘ ν :=
MutuallySingular.mono_ac h (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _) AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
theorem withDensity_eq_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : μ.withDensity f = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf, ← set_lintegral_univ, ← withDensity_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ,
h, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.with_density_eq_zero MeasureTheory.withDensity_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.withDensity f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
⟨withDensity_eq_zero hf, fun h => withDensity_zero (μ := μ) ▸ withDensity_congr_ae h⟩
theorem withDensity_apply_eq_zero' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.withDensity f s = 0 ↔ μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s) = 0 := by
constructor
· intro hs
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
apply measure_mono_null (inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s))
have A : μ.withDensity f t = 0 := by rw [measure_toMeasurable, hs]
rw [withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ s),
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (AEMeasurable.restrict hf),
EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff'₀, ae_iff] at A
swap
· simp only [measurableSet_toMeasurable, MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, mem_setOf_eq, Filter.mem_mk] at A
convert A using 2
ext x
simp only [and_comm, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_setOf_eq,
mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
· intro hs
let t := toMeasurable μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s)
have A : s ⊆ t ∪ { x | f x = 0 } := by
intro x hx
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (fx | fx)
· simp only [fx, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, or_true_iff]
· left
apply subset_toMeasurable _ _
exact ⟨fx, hx⟩
apply measure_mono_null A (measure_union_null _ _)
· apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
rwa [measure_toMeasurable]
rcases hf with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
have t : {x | f x = 0} =ᵐ[μ.withDensity f] {x | g x = 0} := by
apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
filter_upwards [hfg] with a ha
rw [eq_iff_iff]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h] at ha; exact ha.symm,
fun h ↦ by rw [h] at ha; exact ha⟩
rw [measure_congr t, withDensity_congr_ae hfg]
have M : MeasurableSet { x : α | g x = 0 } := hg (measurableSet_singleton _)
rw [withDensity_apply _ M, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hg]
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem M]
simp only [imp_self, Pi.zero_apply, imp_true_iff]
theorem withDensity_apply_eq_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity f s = 0 ↔ μ ({ x | f x ≠ 0 } ∩ s) = 0 :=
withDensity_apply_eq_zero' <| hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.with_density_apply_eq_zero MeasureTheory.withDensity_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_withDensity_iff' {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0 → p x := by
rw [ae_iff, ae_iff, withDensity_apply_eq_zero' hf, iff_iff_eq]
congr
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_forall]
theorem ae_withDensity_iff {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ 0 → p x :=
ae_withDensity_iff' <| hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.ae_with_density_iff MeasureTheory.ae_withDensity_iff
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensity.lean | 303 | 317 | theorem ae_withDensity_iff_ae_restrict' {p : α → Prop} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ.withDensity f, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict { x | f x ≠ 0 }, p x := by |
rw [ae_withDensity_iff' hf, ae_restrict_iff'₀]
· simp only [mem_setOf]
· rcases hf with ⟨g, hg, hfg⟩
have nonneg_eq_ae : {x | g x ≠ 0} =ᵐ[μ] {x | f x ≠ 0} := by
filter_upwards [hfg] with a ha
simp only [eq_iff_iff]
exact ⟨fun (h : g a ≠ 0) ↦ by rwa [← ha] at h,
fun (h : f a ≠ 0) ↦ by rwa [ha] at h⟩
exact NullMeasurableSet.congr
(MeasurableSet.nullMeasurableSet
<| hg (measurableSet_singleton _)).compl
nonneg_eq_ae
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Control.Functor
#align_import control.applicative from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70d50ecfd4900dd6d328da39ab7ebd516abe4025"
universe u v w
section Lemmas
open Function
variable {F : Type u → Type v}
variable [Applicative F] [LawfulApplicative F]
variable {α β γ σ : Type u}
| Mathlib/Control/Applicative.lean | 31 | 33 | theorem Applicative.map_seq_map (f : α → β → γ) (g : σ → β) (x : F α) (y : F σ) :
f <$> x <*> g <$> y = ((· ∘ g) ∘ f) <$> x <*> y := by |
simp [flip, functor_norm]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pythagorean_triples from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
#align sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
#align int.sq_ne_two_mod_four Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
#align pythagorean_triple PythagoreanTriple
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple_comm pythagoreanTriple_comm
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align pythagorean_triple.zero PythagoreanTriple.zero
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem eq : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
#align pythagorean_triple.eq PythagoreanTriple.eq
@[symm]
theorem symm : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple.symm PythagoreanTriple.symm
theorem mul (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul PythagoreanTriple.mul
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 87 | 93 | theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by |
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iic Set.image_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioi Set.image_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iio Set.image_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 474 | 475 | theorem image_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by |
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.