Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Operations
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open Set NNReal
namespace ENNReal
noncomputable section Inv
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
protected theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
#align ennreal.div_eq_inv_mul ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul
@[simp] theorem inv_zero : (0 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ = ∞ :=
show sInf { b : ℝ≥0∞ | 1 ≤ 0 * b } = ∞ by simp
#align ennreal.inv_zero ENNReal.inv_zero
@[simp] theorem inv_top : ∞⁻¹ = 0 :=
bot_unique <| le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun a (h : 0 < a) => sInf_le <| by simp [*, h.ne', top_mul]
#align ennreal.inv_top ENNReal.inv_top
theorem coe_inv_le : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ (↑r)⁻¹ :=
le_sInf fun b (hb : 1 ≤ ↑r * b) =>
coe_le_iff.2 <| by
rintro b rfl
apply NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
rwa [← coe_mul, ← coe_one, coe_le_coe] at hb
#align ennreal.coe_inv_le ENNReal.coe_inv_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) = (↑r)⁻¹ :=
coe_inv_le.antisymm <| sInf_le <| mem_setOf.2 <| by rw [← coe_mul, mul_inv_cancel hr, coe_one]
#align ennreal.coe_inv ENNReal.coe_inv
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inv_two : ((2⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = 2⁻¹ := by rw [coe_inv _root_.two_ne_zero, coe_two]
#align ennreal.coe_inv_two ENNReal.coe_inv_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_div (hr : r ≠ 0) : (↑(p / r) : ℝ≥0∞) = p / r := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul, coe_inv hr]
#align ennreal.coe_div ENNReal.coe_div
lemma coe_div_le : ↑(p / r) ≤ (p / r : ℝ≥0∞) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, coe_mul] using mul_le_mul_left' coe_inv_le _
theorem div_zero (h : a ≠ 0) : a / 0 = ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, h]
#align ennreal.div_zero ENNReal.div_zero
instance : DivInvOneMonoid ℝ≥0∞ :=
{ inferInstanceAs (DivInvMonoid ℝ≥0∞) with
inv_one := by simpa only [coe_inv one_ne_zero, coe_one] using coe_inj.2 inv_one }
protected theorem inv_pow : ∀ {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}, (a ^ n)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ ^ n
| _, 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, inv_one]
| ⊤, n + 1 => by simp [top_pow]
| (a : ℝ≥0), n + 1 => by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp [top_pow]
· have := pow_ne_zero (n + 1) ha
norm_cast
rw [inv_pow]
#align ennreal.inv_pow ENNReal.inv_pow
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a * a⁻¹ = 1 := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ht
norm_cast at h0; norm_cast
exact mul_inv_cancel h0
#align ennreal.mul_inv_cancel ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel
protected theorem inv_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (ht : a ≠ ∞) : a⁻¹ * a = 1 :=
mul_comm a a⁻¹ ▸ ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h0 ht
#align ennreal.inv_mul_cancel ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel
protected theorem div_mul_cancel (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : b / a * a = b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h0 hI, mul_one]
#align ennreal.div_mul_cancel ENNReal.div_mul_cancel
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' (h0 : a ≠ 0) (hI : a ≠ ∞) : a * (b / a) = b := by
rw [mul_comm, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel h0 hI]
#align ennreal.mul_div_cancel' ENNReal.mul_div_cancel'
-- Porting note: `simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc]` doesn't work in the following two
protected theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm, ← mul_assoc]
#align ennreal.mul_comm_div ENNReal.mul_comm_div
protected theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_comm]
#align ennreal.mul_div_right_comm ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm
instance : InvolutiveInv ℝ≥0∞ where
inv_inv a := by
by_cases a = 0 <;> cases a <;> simp_all [none_eq_top, some_eq_coe, -coe_inv, (coe_inv _).symm]
@[simp] protected lemma inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← inv_inj, inv_inv, inv_one]
@[simp] theorem inv_eq_top : a⁻¹ = ∞ ↔ a = 0 := inv_zero ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_top ENNReal.inv_eq_top
theorem inv_ne_top : a⁻¹ ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_top ENNReal.inv_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem inv_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x⁻¹ < ∞ ↔ 0 < x := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, inv_ne_top, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_top ENNReal.inv_lt_top
theorem div_lt_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h1 : x ≠ ∞) (h2 : y ≠ 0) : x / y < ∞ :=
mul_lt_top h1 (inv_ne_top.mpr h2)
#align ennreal.div_lt_top ENNReal.div_lt_top
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_eq_zero : a⁻¹ = 0 ↔ a = ∞ :=
inv_top ▸ inv_inj
#align ennreal.inv_eq_zero ENNReal.inv_eq_zero
protected theorem inv_ne_zero : a⁻¹ ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ ∞ := by simp
#align ennreal.inv_ne_zero ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
protected theorem div_pos (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ ∞) : 0 < a / b :=
ENNReal.mul_pos ha <| ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 hb
#align ennreal.div_pos ENNReal.div_pos
protected theorem mul_inv {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
(a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by
induction' b with b
· replace ha : a ≠ 0 := ha.neg_resolve_right rfl
simp [ha]
induction' a with a
· replace hb : b ≠ 0 := coe_ne_zero.1 (hb.neg_resolve_left rfl)
simp [hb]
by_cases h'a : a = 0
· simp only [h'a, top_mul, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zero_mul, Ne,
not_false_iff, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
by_cases h'b : b = 0
· simp only [h'b, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.coe_ne_top, mul_top, Ne, not_false_iff,
mul_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.inv_eq_zero]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← ENNReal.coe_inv, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'a, ← ENNReal.coe_inv h'b, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_inv_rev, mul_comm]
simp [h'a, h'b]
#align ennreal.mul_inv ENNReal.mul_inv
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
c * a / (c * b) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inl hc) (Or.inl hc'), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', one_mul]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_left ENNReal.mul_div_mul_left
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right (a b : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ 0) (hc' : c ≠ ⊤) :
a * c / (b * c) = a / b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv (Or.inr hc') (Or.inr hc), mul_mul_mul_comm,
ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hc hc', mul_one]
#align ennreal.mul_div_mul_right ENNReal.mul_div_mul_right
protected theorem sub_div (h : 0 < b → b < a → c ≠ 0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.sub_mul (by simpa using h)
#align ennreal.sub_div ENNReal.sub_div
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_pos : 0 < a⁻¹ ↔ a ≠ ∞ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans ENNReal.inv_ne_zero
#align ennreal.inv_pos ENNReal.inv_pos
theorem inv_strictAnti : StrictAnti (Inv.inv : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ≥0∞) := by
intro a b h
lift a to ℝ≥0 using h.ne_top
induction b; · simp
rw [coe_lt_coe] at h
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha); · simp [h]
rw [← coe_inv h.ne_bot, ← coe_inv ha, coe_lt_coe]
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv ha h
#align ennreal.inv_strict_anti ENNReal.inv_strictAnti
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_inv : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
inv_strictAnti.lt_iff_lt
#align ennreal.inv_lt_inv ENNReal.inv_lt_inv
theorem inv_lt_iff_inv_lt : a⁻¹ < b ↔ b⁻¹ < a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt ENNReal.inv_lt_iff_inv_lt
theorem lt_inv_iff_lt_inv : a < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_lt_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv ENNReal.lt_inv_iff_lt_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_inv : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
inv_strictAnti.le_iff_le
#align ennreal.inv_le_inv ENNReal.inv_le_inv
theorem inv_le_iff_inv_le : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ b⁻¹ ≤ a := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a b⁻¹
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_inv_le ENNReal.inv_le_iff_inv_le
theorem le_inv_iff_le_inv : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a⁻¹ := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using @ENNReal.inv_le_inv a⁻¹ b
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_le_inv ENNReal.le_inv_iff_le_inv
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_le_inv' (h : a ≤ b) : b⁻¹ ≤ a⁻¹ :=
ENNReal.inv_strictAnti.antitone h
@[gcongr] protected theorem inv_lt_inv' (h : a < b) : b⁻¹ < a⁻¹ := ENNReal.inv_strictAnti h
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_le_one : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a := by rw [inv_le_iff_inv_le, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_le_one ENNReal.inv_le_one
protected theorem one_le_inv : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 := by rw [le_inv_iff_le_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_le_inv ENNReal.one_le_inv
@[simp]
protected theorem inv_lt_one : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a := by rw [inv_lt_iff_inv_lt, inv_one]
#align ennreal.inv_lt_one ENNReal.inv_lt_one
@[simp]
protected theorem one_lt_inv : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 := by rw [lt_inv_iff_lt_inv, inv_one]
#align ennreal.one_lt_inv ENNReal.one_lt_inv
@[simps! apply]
def _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal : ℝ≥0∞ ≃o ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ where
map_rel_iff' := ENNReal.inv_le_inv
toEquiv := (Equiv.inv ℝ≥0∞).trans OrderDual.toDual
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal OrderIso.invENNReal
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply (a : ℝ≥0∞ᵒᵈ) :
OrderIso.invENNReal.symm a = (OrderDual.ofDual a)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align order_iso.inv_ennreal_symm_apply OrderIso.invENNReal_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem div_top : a / ∞ = 0 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_top, mul_zero]
#align ennreal.div_top ENNReal.div_top
-- Porting note: reordered 4 lemmas
theorem top_div : ∞ / a = if a = ∞ then 0 else ∞ := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv, top_mul']
#align ennreal.top_div ENNReal.top_div
theorem top_div_of_ne_top (h : a ≠ ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := by simp [top_div, h]
#align ennreal.top_div_of_ne_top ENNReal.top_div_of_ne_top
@[simp] theorem top_div_coe : ∞ / p = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.top_div_coe ENNReal.top_div_coe
theorem top_div_of_lt_top (h : a < ∞) : ∞ / a = ∞ := top_div_of_ne_top h.ne
#align ennreal.top_div_of_lt_top ENNReal.top_div_of_lt_top
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div : 0 / a = 0 := zero_mul a⁻¹
#align ennreal.zero_div ENNReal.zero_div
theorem div_eq_top : a / b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = 0 ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_eq_top]
#align ennreal.div_eq_top ENNReal.div_eq_top
protected theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) :
a ≤ c / b ↔ a * b ≤ c := by
induction' b with b
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using ht.neg_resolve_left rfl
rw [div_top, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha) <;> simp [*]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· have hc : c ≠ 0 := h0.neg_resolve_left rfl
simp [div_zero hc]
· rw [← coe_ne_zero] at hb
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right hb coe_ne_top, ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hb coe_ne_top]
#align ennreal.le_div_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le
protected theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
a / b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c * b := by
suffices a * b⁻¹ ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c / b⁻¹ by simpa [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le ?_ ?_).symm <;> simpa
#align ennreal.div_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul
protected theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (hb0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ ∞) (hbt : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ 0) :
c < a / b ↔ c * b < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul hb0 hbt)
#align ennreal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt ENNReal.lt_div_iff_mul_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / c ≤ b := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· have : a = 0 := by simpa [h0] using h
simp [*]
by_cases hinf : c = ∞; · simp [hinf]
exact (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul (Or.inl h0) (Or.inl hinf)).2 h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem div_le_of_le_mul' (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
div_le_of_le_mul <| mul_comm b c ▸ h
#align ennreal.div_le_of_le_mul' ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul'
protected theorem div_self_le_one : a / a ≤ 1 := div_le_of_le_mul <| by rw [one_mul]
theorem mul_le_of_le_div (h : a ≤ b / c) : a * c ≤ b := by
rw [← inv_inv c]
exact div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div
theorem mul_le_of_le_div' (h : a ≤ b / c) : c * a ≤ b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_le_of_le_div h
#align ennreal.mul_le_of_le_div' ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div'
protected theorem div_lt_iff (h0 : b ≠ 0 ∨ c ≠ 0) (ht : b ≠ ∞ ∨ c ≠ ∞) : c / b < a ↔ c < a * b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le h0 ht
#align ennreal.div_lt_iff ENNReal.div_lt_iff
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div (h : a < b / c) : a * c < b := by
contrapose! h
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div' (h : a < b / c) : c * a < b :=
mul_comm a c ▸ mul_lt_of_lt_div h
#align ennreal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div'
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul (h : a < b * c) : a / c < b :=
mul_lt_of_lt_div <| by rwa [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul' (h : a < b * c) : a / b < c :=
div_lt_of_lt_mul <| by rwa [mul_comm]
theorem inv_le_iff_le_mul (h₁ : b = ∞ → a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a = ∞ → b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ 1 ≤ a * b := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul, mul_comm]
exacts [or_not_of_imp h₁, not_or_of_imp h₂]
#align ennreal.inv_le_iff_le_mul ENNReal.inv_le_iff_le_mul
@[simp 900]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le : a ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ a * b ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_div, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le] <;>
· right
simp
#align ennreal.le_inv_iff_mul_le ENNReal.le_inv_iff_mul_le
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div (hab : a ≤ b) (hdc : d ≤ c) : a / c ≤ b / d :=
div_eq_mul_inv b d ▸ div_eq_mul_inv a c ▸ mul_le_mul' hab (ENNReal.inv_le_inv.mpr hdc)
#align ennreal.div_le_div ENNReal.div_le_div
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_left (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : c / b ≤ c / a :=
ENNReal.div_le_div le_rfl h
#align ennreal.div_le_div_left ENNReal.div_le_div_left
@[gcongr] protected theorem div_le_div_right (h : a ≤ b) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : a / c ≤ b / c :=
ENNReal.div_le_div h le_rfl
#align ennreal.div_le_div_right ENNReal.div_le_div_right
protected theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : a * b = 1) : a = b⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_one a, ← ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (right_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h), ← mul_assoc, h,
one_mul]
rintro rfl
simp [left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one h] at h
#align ennreal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left ENNReal.eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Inv.lean | 389 | 391 | theorem mul_le_iff_le_inv {a b r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr₀ : r ≠ 0) (hr₁ : r ≠ ∞) : r * a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ r⁻¹ * b := by |
rw [← @ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left _ a _ hr₀ hr₁, ← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hr₀ hr₁,
one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Nonempty
import Mathlib.Init.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
#align_import logic.function.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"29cb56a7b35f72758b05a30490e1f10bd62c35c1"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace Function
section
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
@[reducible, simp] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : β x := f x
#align function.eval Function.eval
theorem eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : eval x f = f x :=
rfl
#align function.eval_apply Function.eval_apply
theorem const_def {y : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ y) = const α y :=
rfl
#align function.const_def Function.const_def
theorem const_injective [Nonempty α] : Injective (const α : β → α → β) := fun y₁ y₂ h ↦
let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
congr_fun h x
#align function.const_injective Function.const_injective
@[simp]
theorem const_inj [Nonempty α] {y₁ y₂ : β} : const α y₁ = const α y₂ ↔ y₁ = y₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ const_injective h, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
#align function.const_inj Function.const_inj
#align function.id_def Function.id_def
-- Porting note: `Function.onFun` is now reducible
-- @[simp]
theorem onFun_apply (f : β → β → γ) (g : α → β) (a b : α) : onFun f g a b = f (g a) (g b) :=
rfl
#align function.on_fun_apply Function.onFun_apply
lemma hfunext {α α' : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : ∀a, β a} {f' : ∀a, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', HEq a a' → HEq (f a) (f' a')) : HEq f f' := by
subst hα
have : ∀a, HEq (f a) (f' a) := fun a ↦ h a a (HEq.refl a)
have : β = β' := by funext a; exact type_eq_of_heq (this a)
subst this
apply heq_of_eq
funext a
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
#align function.hfunext Function.hfunext
#align function.funext_iff Function.funext_iff
theorem ne_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : ∀ a, β a} : f₁ ≠ f₂ ↔ ∃ a, f₁ a ≠ f₂ a :=
funext_iff.not.trans not_forall
#align function.ne_iff Function.ne_iff
lemma funext_iff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {g : α → β} (x y : α) :
f x = g y ↔ f = g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ funext fun z ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Subsingleton.elim x z, Subsingleton.elim y z] at h
· rw [h, Subsingleton.elim x y]
protected theorem Bijective.injective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Injective f := hf.1
#align function.bijective.injective Function.Bijective.injective
protected theorem Bijective.surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Surjective f := hf.2
#align function.bijective.surjective Function.Bijective.surjective
theorem Injective.eq_iff (I : Injective f) {a b : α} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
⟨@I _ _, congr_arg f⟩
#align function.injective.eq_iff Function.Injective.eq_iff
theorem Injective.beq_eq {α β : Type*} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [BEq β] [LawfulBEq β] {f : α → β}
(I : Injective f) {a b : α} : (f a == f b) = (a == b) := by
by_cases h : a == b <;> simp [h] <;> simpa [I.eq_iff] using h
theorem Injective.eq_iff' (I : Injective f) {a b : α} {c : β} (h : f b = c) : f a = c ↔ a = b :=
h ▸ I.eq_iff
#align function.injective.eq_iff' Function.Injective.eq_iff'
theorem Injective.ne (hf : Injective f) {a₁ a₂ : α} : a₁ ≠ a₂ → f a₁ ≠ f a₂ :=
mt fun h ↦ hf h
#align function.injective.ne Function.Injective.ne
theorem Injective.ne_iff (hf : Injective f) {x y : α} : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨mt <| congr_arg f, hf.ne⟩
#align function.injective.ne_iff Function.Injective.ne_iff
theorem Injective.ne_iff' (hf : Injective f) {x y : α} {z : β} (h : f y = z) : f x ≠ z ↔ x ≠ y :=
h ▸ hf.ne_iff
#align function.injective.ne_iff' Function.Injective.ne_iff'
theorem not_injective_iff : ¬ Injective f ↔ ∃ a b, f a = f b ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp only [Injective, not_forall, exists_prop]
protected def Injective.decidableEq [DecidableEq β] (I : Injective f) : DecidableEq α :=
fun _ _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
#align function.injective.decidable_eq Function.Injective.decidableEq
theorem Injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Injective g :=
fun _ _ h ↦ I <| congr_arg f h
#align function.injective.of_comp Function.Injective.of_comp
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff (hf : Injective f) (g : γ → α) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨Injective.of_comp, hf.comp⟩
#align function.injective.of_comp_iff Function.Injective.of_comp_iff
theorem Injective.of_comp_right {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) (hg : Surjective g) :
Injective f := fun x y h ↦ by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hg x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hg y
exact congr_arg g (I h)
theorem Surjective.bijective₂_of_injective {g : γ → α} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : Surjective g)
(I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨I.of_comp_right hg, hf⟩, I.of_comp, hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff' (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨fun I ↦ I.of_comp_right hg.2, fun h ↦ h.comp hg.injective⟩
#align function.injective.of_comp_iff' Function.Injective.of_comp_iff'
theorem Injective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Function.Injective g) :
Function.Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
fun _ _ hgf ↦ funext fun i ↦ hg <| (congr_fun hgf i : _)
#align function.injective.comp_left Function.Injective.comp_left
theorem injective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : Injective f :=
fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align function.injective_of_subsingleton Function.injective_of_subsingleton
lemma Injective.dite (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
{f : {a : α // p a} → β} {f' : {a : α // ¬ p a} → β}
(hf : Injective f) (hf' : Injective f')
(im_disj : ∀ {x x' : α} {hx : p x} {hx' : ¬ p x'}, f ⟨x, hx⟩ ≠ f' ⟨x', hx'⟩) :
Function.Injective (fun x ↦ if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else f' ⟨x, h⟩) := fun x₁ x₂ h => by
dsimp only at h
by_cases h₁ : p x₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : p x₂
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; injection (hf h)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h.symm).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; injection (hf' h)
#align function.injective.dite Function.Injective.dite
theorem Surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Surjective f := fun y ↦
let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y
⟨g x, h⟩
#align function.surjective.of_comp Function.Surjective.of_comp
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨Surjective.of_comp, fun h ↦ h.comp hg⟩
#align function.surjective.of_comp_iff Function.Surjective.of_comp_iff
theorem Surjective.of_comp_left {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) (hf : Injective f) :
Surjective g := fun a ↦ let ⟨c, hc⟩ := S (f a); ⟨c, hf hc⟩
theorem Injective.bijective₂_of_surjective {g : γ → α} (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g)
(S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨hf, S.of_comp⟩, hg, S.of_comp_left hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff' (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective g :=
⟨fun S ↦ S.of_comp_left hf.1, hf.surjective.comp⟩
#align function.surjective.of_comp_iff' Function.Surjective.of_comp_iff'
instance decidableEqPFun (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, DecidableEq (α hp)] :
DecidableEq (∀ hp, α hp)
| f, g => decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
protected theorem Surjective.forall (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun h x ↦ h (f x), fun h y ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
hx ▸ h x⟩
#align function.surjective.forall Function.Surjective.forall
protected theorem Surjective.forall₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall
#align function.surjective.forall₂ Function.Surjective.forall₂
protected theorem Surjective.forall₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall₂
#align function.surjective.forall₃ Function.Surjective.forall₃
protected theorem Surjective.exists (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
#align function.surjective.exists Function.Surjective.exists
protected theorem Surjective.exists₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists
#align function.surjective.exists₂ Function.Surjective.exists₂
protected theorem Surjective.exists₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists₂
#align function.surjective.exists₃ Function.Surjective.exists₃
theorem Surjective.injective_comp_right (hf : Surjective f) : Injective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
fun _ _ h ↦ funext <| hf.forall.2 <| congr_fun h
#align function.surjective.injective_comp_right Function.Surjective.injective_comp_right
protected theorem Surjective.right_cancellable (hf : Surjective f) {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
hf.injective_comp_right.eq_iff
#align function.surjective.right_cancellable Function.Surjective.right_cancellable
theorem surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop (h : ∀ g₁ g₂ : β → Prop, g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f → g₁ = g₂) :
Surjective f := by
specialize h (fun y ↦ ∃ x, f x = y) (fun _ ↦ True) (funext fun x ↦ eq_true ⟨_, rfl⟩)
intro y; rw [congr_fun h y]; trivial
#align function.surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop Function.surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop
theorem bijective_iff_existsUnique (f : α → β) : Bijective f ↔ ∀ b : β, ∃! a : α, f a = b :=
⟨fun hf b ↦
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hf.surjective b
⟨a, ha, fun _ ha' ↦ hf.injective (ha'.trans ha.symm)⟩,
fun he ↦ ⟨fun {_a a'} h ↦ (he (f a')).unique h rfl, fun b ↦ (he b).exists⟩⟩
#align function.bijective_iff_exists_unique Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique
protected theorem Bijective.existsUnique {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (b : β) :
∃! a : α, f a = b :=
(bijective_iff_existsUnique f).mp hf b
#align function.bijective.exists_unique Function.Bijective.existsUnique
theorem Bijective.existsUnique_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃! y, p y) ↔ ∃! x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hpy, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf.surjective y
⟨x, by simpa [hx], fun z (hz : p (f z)) ↦ hf.injective <| hx.symm ▸ hy _ hz⟩,
fun ⟨x, hpx, hx⟩ ↦
⟨f x, hpx, fun y hy ↦
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hf.surjective y
hz ▸ congr_arg f (hx _ (by simpa [hz]))⟩⟩
#align function.bijective.exists_unique_iff Function.Bijective.existsUnique_iff
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Bijective f :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff' _ hg) (Surjective.of_comp_iff _ hg.surjective)
#align function.bijective.of_comp_iff Function.Bijective.of_comp_iff
theorem Bijective.of_comp_iff' {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Function.Bijective (f ∘ g) ↔ Function.Bijective g :=
and_congr (Injective.of_comp_iff hf.injective _) (Surjective.of_comp_iff' hf _)
#align function.bijective.of_comp_iff' Function.Bijective.of_comp_iff'
theorem cantor_surjective {α} (f : α → Set α) : ¬Surjective f
| h => let ⟨D, e⟩ := h {a | ¬ f a a}
@iff_not_self (D ∈ f D) <| iff_of_eq <| congr_arg (D ∈ ·) e
#align function.cantor_surjective Function.cantor_surjective
theorem cantor_injective {α : Type*} (f : Set α → α) : ¬Injective f
| i => cantor_surjective (fun a ↦ {b | ∀ U, a = f U → U b}) <|
RightInverse.surjective (fun U ↦ Set.ext fun _ ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ h U rfl, fun h _ e ↦ i e ▸ h⟩)
#align function.cantor_injective Function.cantor_injective
theorem not_surjective_Type {α : Type u} (f : α → Type max u v) : ¬Surjective f := by
intro hf
let T : Type max u v := Sigma f
cases hf (Set T) with | intro U hU =>
let g : Set T → T := fun s ↦ ⟨U, cast hU.symm s⟩
have hg : Injective g := by
intro s t h
suffices cast hU (g s).2 = cast hU (g t).2 by
simp only [cast_cast, cast_eq] at this
assumption
· congr
exact cantor_injective g hg
#align function.not_surjective_Type Function.not_surjective_Type
def IsPartialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (g : β → Option α) : Prop :=
∀ x y, g y = some x ↔ f x = y
#align function.is_partial_inv Function.IsPartialInv
theorem isPartialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x) : g (f x) = some x :=
(H _ _).2 rfl
#align function.is_partial_inv_left Function.isPartialInv_left
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) :
Injective f := fun _ _ h ↦
Option.some.inj <| ((H _ _).2 h).symm.trans ((H _ _).2 rfl)
#align function.injective_of_partial_inv Function.injective_of_isPartialInv
theorem injective_of_isPartialInv_right {α β} {f : α → β} {g} (H : IsPartialInv f g) (x y b)
(h₁ : b ∈ g x) (h₂ : b ∈ g y) : x = y :=
((H _ _).1 h₁).symm.trans ((H _ _).1 h₂)
#align function.injective_of_partial_inv_right Function.injective_of_isPartialInv_right
theorem LeftInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : f ∘ g = id :=
funext h
#align function.left_inverse.comp_eq_id Function.LeftInverse.comp_eq_id
theorem leftInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : LeftInverse f g ↔ f ∘ g = id :=
⟨LeftInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
#align function.left_inverse_iff_comp Function.leftInverse_iff_comp
theorem RightInverse.comp_eq_id {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : g ∘ f = id :=
funext h
#align function.right_inverse.comp_eq_id Function.RightInverse.comp_eq_id
theorem rightInverse_iff_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} : RightInverse f g ↔ g ∘ f = id :=
⟨RightInverse.comp_eq_id, congr_fun⟩
#align function.right_inverse_iff_comp Function.rightInverse_iff_comp
theorem LeftInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : LeftInverse f g)
(hh : LeftInverse h i) : LeftInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
fun a ↦ show h (f (g (i a))) = a by rw [hf (i a), hh a]
#align function.left_inverse.comp Function.LeftInverse.comp
theorem RightInverse.comp {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {h : β → γ} {i : γ → β} (hf : RightInverse f g)
(hh : RightInverse h i) : RightInverse (h ∘ f) (g ∘ i) :=
LeftInverse.comp hh hf
#align function.right_inverse.comp Function.RightInverse.comp
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse g f) : RightInverse f g :=
h
#align function.left_inverse.right_inverse Function.LeftInverse.rightInverse
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse g f) : LeftInverse f g :=
h
#align function.right_inverse.left_inverse Function.RightInverse.leftInverse
theorem LeftInverse.surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) : Surjective f :=
h.rightInverse.surjective
#align function.left_inverse.surjective Function.LeftInverse.surjective
theorem RightInverse.injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : RightInverse f g) : Injective f :=
h.leftInverse.injective
#align function.right_inverse.injective Function.RightInverse.injective
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g)
(hf : Injective f) : RightInverse f g :=
fun x ↦ hf <| h (f x)
#align function.left_inverse.right_inverse_of_injective Function.LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective
theorem LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g)
(hg : Surjective g) : RightInverse f g :=
fun x ↦ let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hg x; hy ▸ congr_arg g (h y)
#align function.left_inverse.right_inverse_of_surjective Function.LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse_of_surjective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse f g → Surjective f → LeftInverse f g :=
LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_surjective
#align function.right_inverse.left_inverse_of_surjective Function.RightInverse.leftInverse_of_surjective
theorem RightInverse.leftInverse_of_injective {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse f g → Injective g → LeftInverse f g :=
LeftInverse.rightInverse_of_injective
#align function.right_inverse.left_inverse_of_injective Function.RightInverse.leftInverse_of_injective
theorem LeftInverse.eq_rightInverse {f : α → β} {g₁ g₂ : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g₁ f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g₂ f) : g₁ = g₂ :=
calc
g₁ = g₁ ∘ f ∘ g₂ := by rw [h₂.comp_eq_id, comp_id]
_ = g₂ := by rw [← comp.assoc, h₁.comp_eq_id, id_comp]
#align function.left_inverse.eq_right_inverse Function.LeftInverse.eq_rightInverse
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable
noncomputable def partialInv {α β} (f : α → β) (b : β) : Option α :=
if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (Classical.choose h) else none
#align function.partial_inv Function.partialInv
theorem partialInv_of_injective {α β} {f : α → β} (I : Injective f) : IsPartialInv f (partialInv f)
| a, b =>
⟨fun h =>
have hpi : partialInv f b = if h : ∃ a, f a = b then some (Classical.choose h) else none :=
rfl
if h' : ∃ a, f a = b
then by rw [hpi, dif_pos h'] at h
injection h with h
subst h
apply Classical.choose_spec h'
else by rw [hpi, dif_neg h'] at h; contradiction,
fun e => e ▸ have h : ∃ a', f a' = f a := ⟨_, rfl⟩
(dif_pos h).trans (congr_arg _ (I <| Classical.choose_spec h))⟩
#align function.partial_inv_of_injective Function.partialInv_of_injective
theorem partialInv_left {α β} {f : α → β} (I : Injective f) : ∀ x, partialInv f (f x) = some x :=
isPartialInv_left (partialInv_of_injective I)
#align function.partial_inv_left Function.partialInv_left
end
section Update
variable {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {α' : Sort w} [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq α']
{f g : (a : α) → β a} {a : α} {b : β a}
def update (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) (v : β a') (a : α) : β a :=
if h : a = a' then Eq.ndrec v h.symm else f a
#align function.update Function.update
@[simp]
theorem update_same (a : α) (v : β a) (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a v a = v :=
dif_pos rfl
#align function.update_same Function.update_same
@[simp]
theorem update_noteq {a a' : α} (h : a ≠ a') (v : β a') (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a' v a = f a :=
dif_neg h
#align function.update_noteq Function.update_noteq
theorem update_apply {β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a' : α) (b : β) (a : α) :
update f a' b a = if a = a' then b else f a := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne a a' with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
#align function.update_apply Function.update_apply
@[nontriviality]
theorem update_eq_const_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (a : α) (v : α') (f : α → α') :
update f a v = const α v :=
funext fun a' ↦ Subsingleton.elim a a' ▸ update_same _ _ _
theorem surjective_eval {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [h : ∀ a, Nonempty (β a)] (a : α) :
Surjective (eval a : (∀ a, β a) → β a) := fun b ↦
⟨@update _ _ (Classical.decEq α) (fun a ↦ (h a).some) a b,
@update_same _ _ (Classical.decEq α) _ _ _⟩
#align function.surjective_eval Function.surjective_eval
theorem update_injective (f : ∀ a, β a) (a' : α) : Injective (update f a') := fun v v' h ↦ by
have := congr_fun h a'
rwa [update_same, update_same] at this
#align function.update_injective Function.update_injective
lemma forall_update_iff (f : ∀a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : ∀a, β a → Prop) :
(∀ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∧ ∀ x, x ≠ a → p x (f x) := by
rw [← and_forall_ne a, update_same]
simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align function.forall_update_iff Function.forall_update_iff
theorem exists_update_iff (f : ∀ a, β a) {a : α} {b : β a} (p : ∀ a, β a → Prop) :
(∃ x, p x (update f a b x)) ↔ p a b ∨ ∃ x ≠ a, p x (f x) := by
rw [← not_forall_not, forall_update_iff f fun a b ↦ ¬p a b]
simp [-not_and, not_and_or]
#align function.exists_update_iff Function.exists_update_iff
theorem update_eq_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : ∀ a, β a} :
update f a b = g ↔ b = g a ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, f x = g x :=
funext_iff.trans <| forall_update_iff _ fun x y ↦ y = g x
#align function.update_eq_iff Function.update_eq_iff
theorem eq_update_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {f g : ∀ a, β a} :
g = update f a b ↔ g a = b ∧ ∀ x ≠ a, g x = f x :=
funext_iff.trans <| forall_update_iff _ fun x y ↦ g x = y
#align function.eq_update_iff Function.eq_update_iff
@[simp] lemma update_eq_self_iff : update f a b = f ↔ b = f a := by simp [update_eq_iff]
#align function.update_eq_self_iff Function.update_eq_self_iff
@[simp] lemma eq_update_self_iff : f = update f a b ↔ f a = b := by simp [eq_update_iff]
#align function.eq_update_self_iff Function.eq_update_self_iff
lemma ne_update_self_iff : f ≠ update f a b ↔ f a ≠ b := eq_update_self_iff.not
#align function.ne_update_self_iff Function.ne_update_self_iff
lemma update_ne_self_iff : update f a b ≠ f ↔ b ≠ f a := update_eq_self_iff.not
#align function.update_ne_self_iff Function.update_ne_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem update_eq_self (a : α) (f : ∀ a, β a) : update f a (f a) = f :=
update_eq_iff.2 ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
#align function.update_eq_self Function.update_eq_self
theorem update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' {α'} (g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} {i : α} (a : β i)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) : (fun j ↦ (update g i a) (f j)) = fun j ↦ g (f j) :=
funext fun _ ↦ update_noteq (h _) _ _
#align function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' Function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne'
theorem update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne {α β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'} {i : α'} (a : β)
(h : ∀ x, f x ≠ i) : update g i a ∘ f = g ∘ f :=
update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne' g a h
#align function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne Function.update_comp_eq_of_forall_ne
theorem update_comp_eq_of_injective' (g : ∀ a, β a) {f : α' → α} (hf : Function.Injective f)
(i : α') (a : β (f i)) : (fun j ↦ update g (f i) a (f j)) = update (fun i ↦ g (f i)) i a :=
eq_update_iff.2 ⟨update_same _ _ _, fun _ hj ↦ update_noteq (hf.ne hj) _ _⟩
#align function.update_comp_eq_of_injective' Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective'
theorem update_comp_eq_of_injective {β : Sort*} (g : α' → β) {f : α → α'}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (i : α) (a : β) :
Function.update g (f i) a ∘ f = Function.update (g ∘ f) i a :=
update_comp_eq_of_injective' g hf i a
#align function.update_comp_eq_of_injective Function.update_comp_eq_of_injective
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Basic.lean | 651 | 657 | theorem apply_update {ι : Sort*} [DecidableEq ι] {α β : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, α i → β i)
(g : ∀ i, α i) (i : ι) (v : α i) (j : ι) :
f j (update g i v j) = update (fun k ↦ f k (g k)) i (f i v) j := by |
by_cases h:j = i
· subst j
simp
· simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Gauge
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Normed
open Metric Bornology Filter Set
open scoped NNReal Topology Pointwise
noncomputable section
section Module
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
def gaugeRescale (s t : Set E) (x : E) : E := (gauge s x / gauge t x) • x
theorem gaugeRescale_def (s t : Set E) (x : E) :
gaugeRescale s t x = (gauge s x / gauge t x) • x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem gaugeRescale_zero (s t : Set E) : gaugeRescale s t 0 = 0 := smul_zero _
theorem gaugeRescale_smul (s t : Set E) {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (x : E) :
gaugeRescale s t (c • x) = c • gaugeRescale s t x := by
simp only [gaugeRescale, gauge_smul_of_nonneg hc, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
rw [mul_div_mul_comm, mul_right_comm, div_self_mul_self]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [T1Space E]
theorem gaugeRescale_self_apply {s : Set E} (hsa : Absorbent ℝ s) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s)
(x : E) : gaugeRescale s s x = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx; · simp
rw [gaugeRescale, div_self, one_smul]
exact ((gauge_pos hsa hsb).2 hx).ne'
theorem gaugeRescale_self {s : Set E} (hsa : Absorbent ℝ s) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
gaugeRescale s s = id :=
funext <| gaugeRescale_self_apply hsa hsb
theorem gauge_gaugeRescale' (s : Set E) {t : Set E} {x : E} (hx : gauge t x ≠ 0) :
gauge t (gaugeRescale s t x) = gauge s x := by
rw [gaugeRescale, gauge_smul_of_nonneg (div_nonneg (gauge_nonneg _) (gauge_nonneg _)),
smul_eq_mul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hx]
theorem gauge_gaugeRescale (s : Set E) {t : Set E} (hta : Absorbent ℝ t) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t)
(x : E) : gauge t (gaugeRescale s t x) = gauge s x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· exact gauge_gaugeRescale' s ((gauge_pos hta htb).2 hx).ne'
theorem gauge_gaugeRescale_le (s t : Set E) (x : E) :
gauge t (gaugeRescale s t x) ≤ gauge s x := by
by_cases hx : gauge t x = 0
· simp [gaugeRescale, hx, gauge_nonneg]
· exact (gauge_gaugeRescale' s hx).le
theorem gaugeRescale_gaugeRescale {s t u : Set E} (hta : Absorbent ℝ t) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t)
(x : E) : gaugeRescale t u (gaugeRescale s t x) = gaugeRescale s u x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx; · simp
rw [gaugeRescale_def s t x, gaugeRescale_smul, gaugeRescale, gaugeRescale, smul_smul,
div_mul_div_cancel]
exacts [((gauge_pos hta htb).2 hx).ne', div_nonneg (gauge_nonneg _) (gauge_nonneg _)]
def gaugeRescaleEquiv (s t : Set E) (hsa : Absorbent ℝ s) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s)
(hta : Absorbent ℝ t) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t) : E ≃ E where
toFun := gaugeRescale s t
invFun := gaugeRescale t s
left_inv x := by rw [gaugeRescale_gaugeRescale, gaugeRescale_self_apply] <;> assumption
right_inv x := by rw [gaugeRescale_gaugeRescale, gaugeRescale_self_apply] <;> assumption
variable [TopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousSMul ℝ E] {s t : Set E}
theorem mapsTo_gaugeRescale_interior (h₀ : t ∈ 𝓝 0) (hc : Convex ℝ t) :
MapsTo (gaugeRescale s t) (interior s) (interior t) := fun x hx ↦ by
rw [← gauge_lt_one_iff_mem_interior] <;> try assumption
exact (gauge_gaugeRescale_le _ _ _).trans_lt (interior_subset_gauge_lt_one _ hx)
theorem mapsTo_gaugeRescale_closure {s t : Set E} (hsc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : s ∈ 𝓝 0)
(htc : Convex ℝ t) (ht₀ : 0 ∈ t) (hta : Absorbent ℝ t) :
MapsTo (gaugeRescale s t) (closure s) (closure t) := fun _x hx ↦
mem_closure_of_gauge_le_one htc ht₀ hta <| (gauge_gaugeRescale_le _ _ _).trans <|
(gauge_le_one_iff_mem_closure hsc hs₀).2 hx
theorem continuous_gaugeRescale {s t : Set E} (hs : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : s ∈ 𝓝 0)
(ht : Convex ℝ t) (ht₀ : t ∈ 𝓝 0) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t) :
Continuous (gaugeRescale s t) := by
have hta : Absorbent ℝ t := absorbent_nhds_zero ht₀
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x ↦ ?_
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· rw [ContinuousAt, gaugeRescale_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← comap_gauge_nhds_zero htb ht₀]
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, (· ∘ ·), gauge_gaugeRescale _ hta htb]
exact tendsto_gauge_nhds_zero hs₀
· exact ((continuousAt_gauge hs hs₀).div (continuousAt_gauge ht ht₀)
((gauge_pos hta htb).2 hx).ne').smul continuousAt_id
def gaugeRescaleHomeomorph (s t : Set E)
(hsc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : s ∈ 𝓝 0) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s)
(htc : Convex ℝ t) (ht₀ : t ∈ 𝓝 0) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t) : E ≃ₜ E where
toEquiv := gaugeRescaleEquiv s t (absorbent_nhds_zero hs₀) hsb (absorbent_nhds_zero ht₀) htb
continuous_toFun := by apply continuous_gaugeRescale <;> assumption
continuous_invFun := by apply continuous_gaugeRescale <;> assumption
theorem image_gaugeRescaleHomeomorph_interior {s t : Set E}
(hsc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : s ∈ 𝓝 0) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s)
(htc : Convex ℝ t) (ht₀ : t ∈ 𝓝 0) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t) :
gaugeRescaleHomeomorph s t hsc hs₀ hsb htc ht₀ htb '' interior s = interior t :=
Subset.antisymm (mapsTo_gaugeRescale_interior ht₀ htc).image_subset <| by
rw [← Homeomorph.preimage_symm, ← image_subset_iff]
exact (mapsTo_gaugeRescale_interior hs₀ hsc).image_subset
theorem image_gaugeRescaleHomeomorph_closure {s t : Set E}
(hsc : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : s ∈ 𝓝 0) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s)
(htc : Convex ℝ t) (ht₀ : t ∈ 𝓝 0) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t) :
gaugeRescaleHomeomorph s t hsc hs₀ hsb htc ht₀ htb '' closure s = closure t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (mapsTo_gaugeRescale_closure hsc hs₀ htc
(mem_of_mem_nhds ht₀) (absorbent_nhds_zero ht₀)).image_subset ?_
rw [← Homeomorph.preimage_symm, ← image_subset_iff]
exact (mapsTo_gaugeRescale_closure htc ht₀ hsc
(mem_of_mem_nhds hs₀) (absorbent_nhds_zero hs₀)).image_subset
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/GaugeRescale.lean | 149 | 170 | theorem exists_homeomorph_image_eq {s t : Set E}
(hsc : Convex ℝ s) (hsne : (interior s).Nonempty) (hsb : IsVonNBounded ℝ s)
(hst : Convex ℝ t) (htne : (interior t).Nonempty) (htb : IsVonNBounded ℝ t) :
∃ e : E ≃ₜ E, e '' interior s = interior t ∧ e '' closure s = closure t ∧
e '' frontier s = frontier t := by |
rsuffices ⟨e, h₁, h₂⟩ : ∃ e : E ≃ₜ E, e '' interior s = interior t ∧ e '' closure s = closure t
· refine ⟨e, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
simp_rw [← closure_diff_interior, image_diff e.injective, h₁, h₂]
rcases hsne with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases htne with ⟨y, hy⟩
set h : E ≃ₜ E := by
apply gaugeRescaleHomeomorph (-x +ᵥ s) (-y +ᵥ t) <;>
simp [← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, interior_vadd, mem_vadd_set_iff_neg_vadd_mem, *]
refine ⟨.trans (.addLeft (-x)) <| h.trans <| .addLeft y, ?_, ?_⟩
· calc
(fun a ↦ y + h (-x + a)) '' interior s = y +ᵥ h '' interior (-x +ᵥ s) := by
simp_rw [interior_vadd, ← image_vadd, image_image, vadd_eq_add]
_ = _ := by rw [image_gaugeRescaleHomeomorph_interior, interior_vadd, vadd_neg_vadd]
· calc
(fun a ↦ y + h (-x + a)) '' closure s = y +ᵥ h '' closure (-x +ᵥ s) := by
simp_rw [closure_vadd, ← image_vadd, image_image, vadd_eq_add]
_ = _ := by rw [image_gaugeRescaleHomeomorph_closure, closure_vadd, vadd_neg_vadd]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Option
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sum
#align_import combinatorics.hales_jewett from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1126441d6bccf98c81214a0780c73d499f6721fe"
open scoped Classical
universe u v
namespace Combinatorics
structure Line (α ι : Type*) where
idxFun : ι → Option α
proper : ∃ i, idxFun i = none
#align combinatorics.line Combinatorics.Line
namespace Line
-- This lets us treat a line `l : Line α ι` as a function `α → ι → α`.
instance (α ι) : CoeFun (Line α ι) fun _ => α → ι → α :=
⟨fun l x i => (l.idxFun i).getD x⟩
def IsMono {α ι κ} (C : (ι → α) → κ) (l : Line α ι) : Prop :=
∃ c, ∀ x, C (l x) = c
#align combinatorics.line.is_mono Combinatorics.Line.IsMono
def diagonal (α ι) [Nonempty ι] : Line α ι where
idxFun _ := none
proper := ⟨Classical.arbitrary ι, rfl⟩
#align combinatorics.line.diagonal Combinatorics.Line.diagonal
instance (α ι) [Nonempty ι] : Inhabited (Line α ι) :=
⟨diagonal α ι⟩
structure AlmostMono {α ι κ : Type*} (C : (ι → Option α) → κ) where
line : Line (Option α) ι
color : κ
has_color : ∀ x : α, C (line (some x)) = color
#align combinatorics.line.almost_mono Combinatorics.Line.AlmostMono
instance {α ι κ : Type*} [Nonempty ι] [Inhabited κ] :
Inhabited (AlmostMono fun _ : ι → Option α => (default : κ)) :=
⟨{ line := default
color := default
has_color := fun _ ↦ rfl}⟩
structure ColorFocused {α ι κ : Type*} (C : (ι → Option α) → κ) where
lines : Multiset (AlmostMono C)
focus : ι → Option α
is_focused : ∀ p ∈ lines, p.line none = focus
distinct_colors : (lines.map AlmostMono.color).Nodup
#align combinatorics.line.color_focused Combinatorics.Line.ColorFocused
instance {α ι κ} (C : (ι → Option α) → κ) : Inhabited (ColorFocused C) := by
refine ⟨⟨0, fun _ => none, fun h => ?_, Multiset.nodup_zero⟩⟩
simp only [Multiset.not_mem_zero, IsEmpty.forall_iff]
def map {α α' ι} (f : α → α') (l : Line α ι) : Line α' ι where
idxFun i := (l.idxFun i).map f
proper := ⟨l.proper.choose, by simp only [l.proper.choose_spec, Option.map_none']⟩
#align combinatorics.line.map Combinatorics.Line.map
def vertical {α ι ι'} (v : ι → α) (l : Line α ι') : Line α (Sum ι ι') where
idxFun := Sum.elim (some ∘ v) l.idxFun
proper := ⟨Sum.inr l.proper.choose, l.proper.choose_spec⟩
#align combinatorics.line.vertical Combinatorics.Line.vertical
def horizontal {α ι ι'} (l : Line α ι) (v : ι' → α) : Line α (Sum ι ι') where
idxFun := Sum.elim l.idxFun (some ∘ v)
proper := ⟨Sum.inl l.proper.choose, l.proper.choose_spec⟩
#align combinatorics.line.horizontal Combinatorics.Line.horizontal
def prod {α ι ι'} (l : Line α ι) (l' : Line α ι') : Line α (Sum ι ι') where
idxFun := Sum.elim l.idxFun l'.idxFun
proper := ⟨Sum.inl l.proper.choose, l.proper.choose_spec⟩
#align combinatorics.line.prod Combinatorics.Line.prod
theorem apply {α ι} (l : Line α ι) (x : α) : l x = fun i => (l.idxFun i).getD x :=
rfl
#align combinatorics.line.apply Combinatorics.Line.apply
theorem apply_none {α ι} (l : Line α ι) (x : α) (i : ι) (h : l.idxFun i = none) : l x i = x := by
simp only [Option.getD_none, h, l.apply]
#align combinatorics.line.apply_none Combinatorics.Line.apply_none
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/HalesJewett.lean | 179 | 180 | theorem apply_of_ne_none {α ι} (l : Line α ι) (x : α) (i : ι) (h : l.idxFun i ≠ none) :
some (l x i) = l.idxFun i := by | rw [l.apply, Option.getD_of_ne_none h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.PiLex
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.fin.tuple.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ef997baa41b5c428be3fb50089a7139bf4ee886b"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
#align fin.tuple0_le Fin.tuple0_le
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
#align fin.tail Fin.tail
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
#align fin.tail_def Fin.tail_def
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
#align fin.cons Fin.cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [tail, cons]
#align fin.tail_cons Fin.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_succ Fin.cons_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_zero Fin.cons_zero
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Type*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_noteq h', update_noteq this, cons_succ]
#align fin.cons_update Fin.cons_update
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
#align fin.cons_injective2 Fin.cons_injective2
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_cons {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
#align fin.cons_eq_cons Fin.cons_eq_cons
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
#align fin.cons_left_injective Fin.cons_left_injective
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
#align fin.cons_right_injective Fin.cons_right_injective
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_noteq, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
#align fin.update_cons_zero Fin.update_cons_zero
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: linter claims LHS doesn't simplify
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
#align fin.cons_self_tail Fin.cons_self_tail
-- Porting note: Mathport removes `_root_`?
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
#align fin.cons_cases Fin.consCases
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
#align fin.cons_cases_cons Fin.consCases_cons
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Type*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| n + 1, x => consCases (fun x₀ x ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
#align fin.cons_induction Fin.consInductionₓ -- Porting note: universes
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
#align fin.cons_injective_of_injective Fin.cons_injective_of_injective
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi, succ_ne_zero] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
#align fin.cons_injective_iff Fin.cons_injective_iff
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
#align fin.forall_fin_zero_pi Fin.forall_fin_zero_pi
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align fin.exists_fin_zero_pi Fin.exists_fin_zero_pi
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
#align fin.forall_fin_succ_pi Fin.forall_fin_succ_pi
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
#align fin.exists_fin_succ_pi Fin.exists_fin_succ_pi
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail, Fin.succ_ne_zero]
#align fin.tail_update_zero Fin.tail_update_zero
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
#align fin.tail_update_succ Fin.tail_update_succ
theorem comp_cons {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
#align fin.comp_cons Fin.comp_cons
theorem comp_tail {α : Type*} {β : Type*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
#align fin.comp_tail Fin.comp_tail
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
#align fin.le_cons Fin.le_cons
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
#align fin.cons_le Fin.cons_le
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
#align fin.cons_le_cons Fin.cons_le_cons
theorem pi_lex_lt_cons_cons {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ}
(s : ∀ {i : Fin n.succ}, α i → α i → Prop) :
Pi.Lex (· < ·) (@s) (Fin.cons x₀ x) (Fin.cons y₀ y) ↔
s x₀ y₀ ∨ x₀ = y₀ ∧ Pi.Lex (· < ·) (@fun i : Fin n ↦ @s i.succ) x y := by
simp_rw [Pi.Lex, Fin.exists_fin_succ, Fin.cons_succ, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.forall_fin_succ]
simp [and_assoc, exists_and_left]
#align fin.pi_lex_lt_cons_cons Fin.pi_lex_lt_cons_cons
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
#align fin.range_fin_succ Fin.range_fin_succ
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
#align fin.range_cons Fin.range_cons
section InsertNth
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} {β : Type v}
@[elab_as_elim]
def succAboveCases {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) : α j :=
if hj : j = i then Eq.rec x hj.symm
else
if hlt : j < i then @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hlt) (p _)
else @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _ (succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ <|
(Ne.lt_or_lt hj).resolve_left hlt) (p _)
#align fin.succ_above_cases Fin.succAboveCases
theorem forall_iff_succAbove {p : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∀ j, p j) ↔ p i ∧ ∀ j, p (i.succAbove j) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, fun _ ↦ h _⟩, fun h ↦ succAboveCases i h.1 h.2⟩
#align fin.forall_iff_succ_above Fin.forall_iff_succAbove
def insertNth (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j : Fin n, α (i.succAbove j)) (j : Fin (n + 1)) :
α j :=
succAboveCases i x p j
#align fin.insert_nth Fin.insertNth
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_same (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)) :
insertNth i x p i = x := by simp [insertNth, succAboveCases]
#align fin.insert_nth_apply_same Fin.insertNth_apply_same
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_apply_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : α i) (p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j))
(j : Fin n) : insertNth i x p (i.succAbove j) = p j := by
simp only [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg (succAbove_ne _ _), succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt]
split_ifs with hlt
· generalize_proofs H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : castPred ((succAbove i) j) H₁ = k
rw [castPred_succAbove _ _ hlt] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
· generalize_proofs H₁ H₂; revert H₂
generalize hk : pred (succAbove i j) H₁ = k
erw [pred_succAbove _ _ (le_of_not_lt hlt)] at hk; cases hk
intro; rfl
#align fin.insert_nth_apply_succ_above Fin.insertNth_apply_succAbove
@[simp]
theorem succAbove_cases_eq_insertNth : @succAboveCases.{u + 1} = @insertNth.{u} :=
rfl
#align fin.succ_above_cases_eq_insert_nth Fin.succAbove_cases_eq_insertNth
@[simp]
theorem insertNth_comp_succAbove (i : Fin (n + 1)) (x : β) (p : Fin n → β) :
insertNth i x p ∘ i.succAbove = p :=
funext (by unfold comp; exact insertNth_apply_succAbove i _ _)
#align fin.insert_nth_comp_succ_above Fin.insertNth_comp_succAbove
theorem insertNth_eq_iff {i : Fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)} {q : ∀ j, α j} :
i.insertNth x p = q ↔ q i = x ∧ p = fun j ↦ q (i.succAbove j) := by
simp [funext_iff, forall_iff_succAbove i, eq_comm]
#align fin.insert_nth_eq_iff Fin.insertNth_eq_iff
theorem eq_insertNth_iff {i : Fin (n + 1)} {x : α i} {p : ∀ j, α (i.succAbove j)} {q : ∀ j, α j} :
q = i.insertNth x p ↔ q i = x ∧ p = fun j ↦ q (i.succAbove j) :=
eq_comm.trans insertNth_eq_iff
#align fin.eq_insert_nth_iff Fin.eq_insertNth_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 818 | 822 | theorem insertNth_apply_below {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j < i) (x : α i)
(p : ∀ k, α (i.succAbove k)) :
i.insertNth x p j = @Eq.recOn _ _ (fun x _ ↦ α x) _
(succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h) (p <| j.castPred _) := by |
rw [insertNth, succAboveCases, dif_neg h.ne, dif_pos h]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Grade
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
#align_import data.finset.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Finset α) where
finsetIcc s t := t.powerset.filter (s ⊆ ·)
finsetIco s t := t.ssubsets.filter (s ⊆ ·)
finsetIoc s t := t.powerset.filter (s ⊂ ·)
finsetIoo s t := t.ssubsets.filter (s ⊂ ·)
finset_mem_Icc s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_powerset]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ico s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_ssubsets]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ioc s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_powerset]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ioo s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_ssubsets]
exact and_comm
theorem Icc_eq_filter_powerset : Icc s t = t.powerset.filter (s ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.Icc_eq_filter_powerset Finset.Icc_eq_filter_powerset
theorem Ico_eq_filter_ssubsets : Ico s t = t.ssubsets.filter (s ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.Ico_eq_filter_ssubsets Finset.Ico_eq_filter_ssubsets
theorem Ioc_eq_filter_powerset : Ioc s t = t.powerset.filter (s ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.Ioc_eq_filter_powerset Finset.Ioc_eq_filter_powerset
theorem Ioo_eq_filter_ssubsets : Ioo s t = t.ssubsets.filter (s ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.Ioo_eq_filter_ssubsets Finset.Ioo_eq_filter_ssubsets
theorem Iic_eq_powerset : Iic s = s.powerset :=
filter_true_of_mem fun t _ => empty_subset t
#align finset.Iic_eq_powerset Finset.Iic_eq_powerset
theorem Iio_eq_ssubsets : Iio s = s.ssubsets :=
filter_true_of_mem fun t _ => empty_subset t
#align finset.Iio_eq_ssubsets Finset.Iio_eq_ssubsets
variable {s t}
theorem Icc_eq_image_powerset (h : s ⊆ t) : Icc s t = (t \ s).powerset.image (s ∪ ·) := by
ext u
simp_rw [mem_Icc, mem_image, mem_powerset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
exact ⟨u \ s, sdiff_le_sdiff_right ht, sup_sdiff_cancel_right hs⟩
· rintro ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact ⟨le_sup_left, union_subset h <| hv.trans sdiff_subset⟩
#align finset.Icc_eq_image_powerset Finset.Icc_eq_image_powerset
theorem Ico_eq_image_ssubsets (h : s ⊆ t) : Ico s t = (t \ s).ssubsets.image (s ∪ ·) := by
ext u
simp_rw [mem_Ico, mem_image, mem_ssubsets]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
exact ⟨u \ s, sdiff_lt_sdiff_right ht hs, sup_sdiff_cancel_right hs⟩
· rintro ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact ⟨le_sup_left, sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left hv h⟩
#align finset.Ico_eq_image_ssubsets Finset.Ico_eq_image_ssubsets
theorem card_Icc_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Icc s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) := by
rw [← card_sdiff h, ← card_powerset, Icc_eq_image_powerset h, Finset.card_image_iff]
rintro u hu v hv (huv : s ⊔ u = s ⊔ v)
rw [mem_coe, mem_powerset] at hu hv
rw [← (disjoint_sdiff.mono_right hu : Disjoint s u).sup_sdiff_cancel_left, ←
(disjoint_sdiff.mono_right hv : Disjoint s v).sup_sdiff_cancel_left, huv]
#align finset.card_Icc_finset Finset.card_Icc_finset
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Interval.lean | 110 | 111 | theorem card_Ico_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ico s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 1 := by |
rw [card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc_finset h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Iterate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.Zify
#align_import data.nat.fib from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
namespace Nat
-- Porting note: Lean cannot find pp_nodot at the time of this port.
-- @[pp_nodot]
def fib (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((fun p : ℕ × ℕ => (p.snd, p.fst + p.snd))^[n] (0, 1)).fst
#align nat.fib Nat.fib
@[simp]
theorem fib_zero : fib 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.fib_zero Nat.fib_zero
@[simp]
theorem fib_one : fib 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.fib_one Nat.fib_one
@[simp]
theorem fib_two : fib 2 = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.fib_two Nat.fib_two
theorem fib_add_two {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) = fib n + fib (n + 1) := by
simp [fib, Function.iterate_succ_apply']
#align nat.fib_add_two Nat.fib_add_two
lemma fib_add_one : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → fib (n + 1) = fib (n - 1) + fib n
| _n + 1, _ => fib_add_two
theorem fib_le_fib_succ {n : ℕ} : fib n ≤ fib (n + 1) := by cases n <;> simp [fib_add_two]
#align nat.fib_le_fib_succ Nat.fib_le_fib_succ
@[mono]
theorem fib_mono : Monotone fib :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun _ => fib_le_fib_succ
#align nat.fib_mono Nat.fib_mono
@[simp] lemma fib_eq_zero : ∀ {n}, fib n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => Iff.rfl
| 1 => Iff.rfl
| n + 2 => by simp [fib_add_two, fib_eq_zero]
@[simp] lemma fib_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < fib n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.fib_pos Nat.fib_pos
theorem fib_add_two_sub_fib_add_one {n : ℕ} : fib (n + 2) - fib (n + 1) = fib n := by
rw [fib_add_two, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align nat.fib_add_two_sub_fib_add_one Nat.fib_add_two_sub_fib_add_one
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Fib/Basic.lean | 114 | 117 | theorem fib_lt_fib_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : fib n < fib (n + 1) := by |
rcases exists_add_of_le hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← tsub_pos_iff_lt, add_comm 2, add_right_comm, fib_add_two, add_tsub_cancel_right, fib_pos]
exact succ_pos n
|
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Copy
#align_import topology.sets.opens from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
open Filter Function Order Set
open Topology
variable {ι α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable (α)
structure Opens where
carrier : Set α
is_open' : IsOpen carrier
#align topological_space.opens TopologicalSpace.Opens
variable {α}
namespace Opens
instance : SetLike (Opens α) α where
coe := Opens.carrier
coe_injective' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ _ => by congr
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Opens α) (↑) IsOpen :=
⟨fun s h => ⟨⟨s, h⟩, rfl⟩⟩
theorem «forall» {p : Opens α → Prop} : (∀ U, p U) ↔ ∀ (U : Set α) (hU : IsOpen U), p ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
⟨fun h _ _ => h _, fun h _ => h _ _⟩
#align topological_space.opens.forall TopologicalSpace.Opens.forall
@[simp] theorem carrier_eq_coe (U : Opens α) : U.1 = ↑U := rfl
#align topological_space.opens.carrier_eq_coe TopologicalSpace.Opens.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk {U : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} : ↑(⟨U, hU⟩ : Opens α) = U :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.coe_mk TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {x : α} {U : Set α} {h : IsOpen U} : x ∈ mk U h ↔ x ∈ U := Iff.rfl
#align topological_space.opens.mem_mk TopologicalSpace.Opens.mem_mk
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] because LHS simplifies to `∃ x, x ∈ U`
protected theorem nonempty_coeSort {U : Opens α} : Nonempty U ↔ (U : Set α).Nonempty :=
Set.nonempty_coe_sort
#align topological_space.opens.nonempty_coe_sort TopologicalSpace.Opens.nonempty_coeSort
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma; todo: prove it for a `SetLike`?
protected theorem nonempty_coe {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ U :=
Iff.rfl
@[ext] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: replace with `∀ x, x ∈ U ↔ x ∈ V`
theorem ext {U V : Opens α} (h : (U : Set α) = V) : U = V :=
SetLike.coe_injective h
#align topological_space.opens.ext TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext
-- Porting note: removed @[simp], simp can prove it
theorem coe_inj {U V : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = V ↔ U = V :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.symm
#align topological_space.opens.coe_inj TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_inj
protected theorem isOpen (U : Opens α) : IsOpen (U : Set α) :=
U.is_open'
#align topological_space.opens.is_open TopologicalSpace.Opens.isOpen
@[simp] theorem mk_coe (U : Opens α) : mk (↑U) U.isOpen = U := rfl
#align topological_space.opens.mk_coe TopologicalSpace.Opens.mk_coe
def Simps.coe (U : Opens α) : Set α := U
#align topological_space.opens.simps.coe TopologicalSpace.Opens.Simps.coe
initialize_simps_projections Opens (carrier → coe)
nonrec def interior (s : Set α) : Opens α :=
⟨interior s, isOpen_interior⟩
#align topological_space.opens.interior TopologicalSpace.Opens.interior
theorem gc : GaloisConnection ((↑) : Opens α → Set α) interior := fun U _ =>
⟨fun h => interior_maximal h U.isOpen, fun h => le_trans h interior_subset⟩
#align topological_space.opens.gc TopologicalSpace.Opens.gc
def gi : GaloisCoinsertion (↑) (@interior α _) where
choice s hs := ⟨s, interior_eq_iff_isOpen.mp <| le_antisymm interior_subset hs⟩
gc := gc
u_l_le _ := interior_subset
choice_eq _s hs := le_antisymm hs interior_subset
#align topological_space.opens.gi TopologicalSpace.Opens.gi
instance : CompleteLattice (Opens α) :=
CompleteLattice.copy (GaloisCoinsertion.liftCompleteLattice gi)
-- le
(fun U V => (U : Set α) ⊆ V) rfl
-- top
⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ (ext interior_univ.symm)
-- bot
⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ rfl
-- sup
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∪ ↑V, U.2.union V.2⟩) rfl
-- inf
(fun U V => ⟨↑U ∩ ↑V, U.2.inter V.2⟩)
(funext₂ fun U V => ext (U.2.inter V.2).interior_eq.symm)
-- sSup
(fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isOpen_biUnion fun s _ => s.2⟩)
(funext fun _ => ext sSup_image.symm)
-- sInf
_ rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inf_mk {U V : Set α} {hU : IsOpen U} {hV : IsOpen V} :
(⟨U, hU⟩ ⊓ ⟨V, hV⟩ : Opens α) = ⟨U ⊓ V, IsOpen.inter hU hV⟩ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.mk_inf_mk TopologicalSpace.Opens.mk_inf_mk
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∩ ↑t :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.coe_inf TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : Opens α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∪ ↑t :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.coe_sup TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Opens α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.coe_bot TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_bot
@[simp] theorem mk_empty : (⟨∅, isOpen_empty⟩ : Opens α) = ⊥ := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = ∅ ↔ U = ⊥ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Opens α) : Set α) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.coe_top TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_top
@[simp] theorem mk_univ : (⟨univ, isOpen_univ⟩ : Opens α) = ⊤ := rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ {U : Opens α} : (U : Set α) = univ ↔ U = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective.eq_iff' rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {S : Set (Opens α)} : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋃ i ∈ S, ↑i :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.coe_Sup TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_sup (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.sup f) : Set α) = s.sup ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_sup (⟨⟨(↑), coe_sup⟩, coe_bot⟩ : SupBotHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
#align topological_space.opens.coe_finset_sup TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_finset_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_finset_inf (f : ι → Opens α) (s : Finset ι) : (↑(s.inf f) : Set α) = s.inf ((↑) ∘ f) :=
map_finset_inf (⟨⟨(↑), coe_inf⟩, coe_top⟩ : InfTopHom (Opens α) (Set α)) _ _
#align topological_space.opens.coe_finset_inf TopologicalSpace.Opens.coe_finset_inf
instance : Inhabited (Opens α) := ⟨⊥⟩
-- porting note (#10754): new instance
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Opens α) where
uniq _ := ext <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
-- porting note (#10754): new instance
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Opens α) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨⊥, ⊤, mt coe_inj.2 empty_ne_univ⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Topology/Sets/Opens.lean | 232 | 233 | theorem coe_iSup {ι} (s : ι → Opens α) : ((⨆ i, s i : Opens α) : Set α) = ⋃ i, s i := by |
simp [iSup]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
#align_import data.pnat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"09597669f02422ed388036273d8848119699c22f"
namespace PNat
open Nat
def gcd (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left (m : ℕ) n.pos⟩
#align pnat.gcd PNat.gcd
def lcm (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), by
let h := mul_pos n.pos m.pos
rw [← gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), mul_comm] at h
exact pos_of_dvd_of_pos (Dvd.intro (Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ)) rfl) h⟩
#align pnat.lcm PNat.lcm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem gcd_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (gcd n m : ℕ) = Nat.gcd n m :=
rfl
#align pnat.gcd_coe PNat.gcd_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lcm_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (lcm n m : ℕ) = Nat.lcm n m :=
rfl
#align pnat.lcm_coe PNat.lcm_coe
theorem gcd_dvd_left (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_dvd_left PNat.gcd_dvd_left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_dvd_right PNat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : k ∣ m) (hn : k ∣ n) : k ∣ gcd m n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_gcd (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
#align pnat.dvd_gcd PNat.dvd_gcd
theorem dvd_lcm_left (n m : ℕ+) : n ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.dvd_lcm_left PNat.dvd_lcm_left
theorem dvd_lcm_right (n m : ℕ+) : m ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.dvd_lcm_right PNat.dvd_lcm_right
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : m ∣ k) (hn : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
dvd_iff.2 (@Nat.lcm_dvd (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
#align pnat.lcm_dvd PNat.lcm_dvd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m * lcm n m = n * m :=
Subtype.eq (Nat.gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_mul_lcm PNat.gcd_mul_lcm
theorem eq_one_of_lt_two {n : ℕ+} : n < 2 → n = 1 := by
intro h; apply le_antisymm; swap
· apply PNat.one_le
· exact PNat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h
#align pnat.eq_one_of_lt_two PNat.eq_one_of_lt_two
section Coprime
def Coprime (m n : ℕ+) : Prop :=
m.gcd n = 1
#align pnat.coprime PNat.Coprime
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coprime_coe {m n : ℕ+} : Nat.Coprime ↑m ↑n ↔ m.Coprime n := by
unfold Nat.Coprime Coprime
rw [← coe_inj]
simp
#align pnat.coprime_coe PNat.coprime_coe
theorem Coprime.mul {k m n : ℕ+} : m.Coprime k → n.Coprime k → (m * n).Coprime k := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul
#align pnat.coprime.mul PNat.Coprime.mul
theorem Coprime.mul_right {k m n : ℕ+} : k.Coprime m → k.Coprime n → k.Coprime (m * n) := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul_right
#align pnat.coprime.mul_right PNat.Coprime.mul_right
theorem gcd_comm {m n : ℕ+} : m.gcd n = n.gcd m := by
apply eq
simp only [gcd_coe]
apply Nat.gcd_comm
#align pnat.gcd_comm PNat.gcd_comm
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : m ∣ n ↔ m.gcd n = m := by
rw [dvd_iff]
rw [Nat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd]
rw [← coe_inj]
simp
#align pnat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd PNat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Prime.lean | 217 | 219 | theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : m ∣ n ↔ n.gcd m = m := by |
rw [gcd_comm]
apply gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
#align_import data.polynomial.erase_lead from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fa256f00ce018e7b40e1dc756e403c86680bf448"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
def eraseLead (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.erase f.natDegree f
#align polynomial.erase_lead Polynomial.eraseLead
section EraseLead
theorem eraseLead_support (f : R[X]) : f.eraseLead.support = f.support.erase f.natDegree := by
simp only [eraseLead, support_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support Polynomial.eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_coeff (i : ℕ) :
f.eraseLead.coeff i = if i = f.natDegree then 0 else f.coeff i := by
simp only [eraseLead, coeff_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_natDegree : f.eraseLead.coeff f.natDegree = 0 := by simp [eraseLead_coeff]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_natDegree
theorem eraseLead_coeff_of_ne (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ f.natDegree) : f.eraseLead.coeff i = f.coeff i := by
simp [eraseLead_coeff, hi]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_of_ne Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_zero : eraseLead (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp only [eraseLead, erase_zero]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_zero
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (f.monomial_add_erase _)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/EraseLead.lean | 70 | 72 | theorem eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f := by |
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Opposites
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Presheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elements
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Final
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.KanExtension
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Over
#align_import category_theory.limits.presheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
section SmallCategory
variable {C : Type u₁} [SmallCategory C]
variable {ℰ : Type u₂} [Category.{u₁} ℰ]
variable (A : C ⥤ ℰ)
namespace ColimitAdj
@[simps!]
def restrictedYoneda : ℰ ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁ :=
yoneda ⋙ (whiskeringLeft _ _ (Type u₁)).obj (Functor.op A)
#align category_theory.colimit_adj.restricted_yoneda CategoryTheory.ColimitAdj.restrictedYoneda
def restrictedYonedaYoneda : restrictedYoneda (yoneda : C ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun P =>
NatIso.ofComponents (fun X => Equiv.toIso yonedaEquiv) @ fun X Y f =>
funext fun x => by
dsimp [yonedaEquiv]
have : x.app X (CategoryStruct.id (Opposite.unop X)) =
(x.app X (𝟙 (Opposite.unop X))) := rfl
rw [this]
rw [← FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ x f (𝟙 _)]
simp only [id_comp, Functor.op_obj, Opposite.unop_op, yoneda_obj_map, comp_id]
#align category_theory.colimit_adj.restricted_yoneda_yoneda CategoryTheory.ColimitAdj.restrictedYonedaYoneda
def restrictYonedaHomEquiv (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (E : ℰ)
{c : Cocone ((CategoryOfElements.π P).leftOp ⋙ A)} (t : IsColimit c) :
(c.pt ⟶ E) ≃ (P ⟶ (restrictedYoneda A).obj E) :=
((uliftTrivial _).symm ≪≫ t.homIso' E).toEquiv.trans
{ toFun := fun k =>
{ app := fun c p => k.1 (Opposite.op ⟨_, p⟩)
naturality := fun c c' f =>
funext fun p =>
(k.2
(Quiver.Hom.op ⟨f, rfl⟩ :
(Opposite.op ⟨c', P.map f p⟩ : P.Elementsᵒᵖ) ⟶ Opposite.op ⟨c, p⟩)).symm }
invFun := fun τ =>
{ val := fun p => τ.app p.unop.1 p.unop.2
property := @fun p p' f => by
simp_rw [← f.unop.2]
apply (congr_fun (τ.naturality f.unop.1) p'.unop.2).symm }
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨k₁, k₂⟩
ext
dsimp
congr 1
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩
rfl }
#align category_theory.colimit_adj.restrict_yoneda_hom_equiv CategoryTheory.ColimitAdj.restrictYonedaHomEquiv
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Presheaf.lean | 121 | 126 | theorem restrictYonedaHomEquiv_natural (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u₁) (E₁ E₂ : ℰ) (g : E₁ ⟶ E₂) {c : Cocone _}
(t : IsColimit c) (k : c.pt ⟶ E₁) :
restrictYonedaHomEquiv A P E₂ t (k ≫ g) =
restrictYonedaHomEquiv A P E₁ t k ≫ (restrictedYoneda A).map g := by |
ext x X
apply (assoc _ _ _).symm
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.quadratic_form.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9b2755b951bc323c962bd072cd447b375cf58101"
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {M₁ M₂ N₁ N₂ : Type*} {Mᵢ Nᵢ : ι → Type*}
namespace QuadraticForm
section Prod
section Pi
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Mᵢ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (Nᵢ i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (Mᵢ i)] [∀ i, Module R (Nᵢ i)]
def pi [Fintype ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) : QuadraticForm R (∀ i, Mᵢ i) :=
∑ i, (Q i).comp (LinearMap.proj i : _ →ₗ[R] Mᵢ i)
#align quadratic_form.pi QuadraticForm.pi
@[simp]
theorem pi_apply [Fintype ι] (Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) (x : ∀ i, Mᵢ i) :
pi Q x = ∑ i, Q i (x i) :=
sum_apply _ _ _
#align quadratic_form.pi_apply QuadraticForm.pi_apply
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Prod.lean | 257 | 261 | theorem pi_apply_single [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
(Q : ∀ i, QuadraticForm R (Mᵢ i)) (i : ι) (m : Mᵢ i) :
pi Q (Pi.single i m) = Q i m := by |
rw [pi_apply, Fintype.sum_eq_single i fun j hj => ?_, Pi.single_eq_same]
rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hj, map_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Basic
#align_import analysis.box_integral.partition.split from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Filter
open Function Set Filter
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι M : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace Box
variable {I : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ} {y : ι → ℝ}
def splitLower (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' I.lower (update I.upper i (min x (I.upper i)))
#align box_integral.box.split_lower BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitLower : (splitLower I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
rw [splitLower, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and, ← Pi.le_def,
le_update_iff, le_min_iff, and_assoc, and_forall_ne (p := fun j => y j ≤ upper I j) i, mem_def]
rw [and_comm (a := y i ≤ x)]
#align box_integral.box.coe_split_lower BoxIntegral.Box.coe_splitLower
theorem splitLower_le : I.splitLower i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_le BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_le
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitLower i x = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
rw [splitLower, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.upper fun j y => y ≤ I.lower j]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_eq_bot BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_self : I.splitLower i x = I ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
simp [splitLower, update_eq_iff]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_eq_self BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_eq_self
theorem splitLower_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, I.lower j < update I.upper i x j :=
(forall_update_iff I.upper fun j y => I.lower j < y).2
⟨h.1, fun j _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitLower i x = (⟨I.lower, update I.upper i x, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [splitLower, mk'_eq_coe, min_eq_left h.2.le,
update, and_self]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_def BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_def
def splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' (update I.lower i (max x (I.lower i))) I.upper
#align box_integral.box.split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitUpper : (splitUpper I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by
rw [splitUpper, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and,
forall_update_iff I.lower fun j z => z < y j, max_lt_iff, and_assoc (a := x < y i),
and_forall_ne (p := fun j => lower I j < y j) i, mem_def]
exact and_comm
#align box_integral.box.coe_split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.coe_splitUpper
theorem splitUpper_le : I.splitUpper i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_le BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_le
@[simp]
theorem splitUpper_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitUpper i x = ⊥ ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
rw [splitUpper, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.lower fun j y => I.upper j ≤ y]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_eq_bot BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem splitUpper_eq_self : I.splitUpper i x = I ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
simp [splitUpper, update_eq_iff]
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_eq_self BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_eq_self
theorem splitUpper_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, update I.lower i x j < I.upper j :=
(forall_update_iff I.lower fun j y => y < I.upper j).2
⟨h.2, fun j _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitUpper i x = (⟨update I.lower i x, I.upper, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [splitUpper, mk'_eq_coe, max_eq_left h.1.le,
update, and_self]
#align box_integral.box.split_upper_def BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper_def
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Split.lean | 139 | 144 | theorem disjoint_splitLower_splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) :
Disjoint (I.splitLower i x) (I.splitUpper i x) := by |
rw [← disjoint_withBotCoe, coe_splitLower, coe_splitUpper]
refine (Disjoint.inf_left' _ ?_).inf_right' _
rw [Set.disjoint_left]
exact fun y (hle : y i ≤ x) hlt => not_lt_of_le hle hlt
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
variable {l m n o : Type*}
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {α : Type v} {β : Type w}
namespace Matrix
def col (w : m → α) : Matrix m Unit α :=
of fun x _ => w x
#align matrix.col Matrix.col
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `col`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem col_apply (w : m → α) (i j) : col w i j = w i :=
rfl
#align matrix.col_apply Matrix.col_apply
def row (v : n → α) : Matrix Unit n α :=
of fun _ y => v y
#align matrix.row Matrix.row
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `row`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem row_apply (v : n → α) (i j) : row v i j = v j :=
rfl
#align matrix.row_apply Matrix.row_apply
theorem col_injective : Function.Injective (col : (m → α) → _) :=
fun _x _y h => funext fun i => congr_fun₂ h i ()
@[simp] theorem col_inj {v w : m → α} : col v = col w ↔ v = w := col_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem col_zero [Zero α] : col (0 : m → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem col_eq_zero [Zero α] (v : m → α) : col v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := col_inj
@[simp]
theorem col_add [Add α] (v w : m → α) : col (v + w) = col v + col w := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_add Matrix.col_add
@[simp]
theorem col_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : col (x • v) = x • col v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_smul Matrix.col_smul
theorem row_injective : Function.Injective (row : (n → α) → _) :=
fun _x _y h => funext fun j => congr_fun₂ h () j
@[simp] theorem row_inj {v w : n → α} : row v = row w ↔ v = w := row_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] theorem row_zero [Zero α] : row (0 : n → α) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem row_eq_zero [Zero α] (v : n → α) : row v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := row_inj
@[simp]
theorem row_add [Add α] (v w : m → α) : row (v + w) = row v + row w := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_add Matrix.row_add
@[simp]
theorem row_smul [SMul R α] (x : R) (v : m → α) : row (x • v) = x • row v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_smul Matrix.row_smul
@[simp]
theorem transpose_col (v : m → α) : (Matrix.col v)ᵀ = Matrix.row v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.transpose_col Matrix.transpose_col
@[simp]
theorem transpose_row (v : m → α) : (Matrix.row v)ᵀ = Matrix.col v := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.transpose_row Matrix.transpose_row
@[simp]
theorem conjTranspose_col [Star α] (v : m → α) : (col v)ᴴ = row (star v) := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.conj_transpose_col Matrix.conjTranspose_col
@[simp]
theorem conjTranspose_row [Star α] (v : m → α) : (row v)ᴴ = col (star v) := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.conj_transpose_row Matrix.conjTranspose_row
theorem row_vecMul [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
Matrix.row (v ᵥ* M) = Matrix.row v * M := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.row_vec_mul Matrix.row_vecMul
theorem col_vecMul [Fintype m] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : m → α) :
Matrix.col (v ᵥ* M) = (Matrix.row v * M)ᵀ := by
ext
rfl
#align matrix.col_vec_mul Matrix.col_vecMul
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/RowCol.lean | 129 | 132 | theorem col_mulVec [Fintype n] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix m n α) (v : n → α) :
Matrix.col (M *ᵥ v) = M * Matrix.col v := by |
ext
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.Trivialization
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightNhds
#align_import topology.fiber_bundle.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
variable {ι B F X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
open TopologicalSpace Filter Set Bundle Topology
-- Porting note(#5171): was @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure FiberBundleCore (ι : Type*) (B : Type*) [TopologicalSpace B] (F : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace F] where
baseSet : ι → Set B
isOpen_baseSet : ∀ i, IsOpen (baseSet i)
indexAt : B → ι
mem_baseSet_at : ∀ x, x ∈ baseSet (indexAt x)
coordChange : ι → ι → B → F → F
coordChange_self : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i, ∀ v, coordChange i i x v = v
continuousOn_coordChange : ∀ i j,
ContinuousOn (fun p : B × F => coordChange i j p.1 p.2) ((baseSet i ∩ baseSet j) ×ˢ univ)
coordChange_comp : ∀ i j k, ∀ x ∈ baseSet i ∩ baseSet j ∩ baseSet k, ∀ v,
(coordChange j k x) (coordChange i j x v) = coordChange i k x v
#align fiber_bundle_core FiberBundleCore
namespace FiberBundleCore
variable [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace F] (Z : FiberBundleCore ι B F)
@[nolint unusedArguments] -- Porting note(#5171): was has_nonempty_instance
def Index (_Z : FiberBundleCore ι B F) := ι
#align fiber_bundle_core.index FiberBundleCore.Index
@[nolint unusedArguments, reducible]
def Base (_Z : FiberBundleCore ι B F) := B
#align fiber_bundle_core.base FiberBundleCore.Base
@[nolint unusedArguments] -- Porting note(#5171): was has_nonempty_instance
def Fiber (_ : FiberBundleCore ι B F) (_x : B) := F
#align fiber_bundle_core.fiber FiberBundleCore.Fiber
instance topologicalSpaceFiber (x : B) : TopologicalSpace (Z.Fiber x) := ‹_›
#align fiber_bundle_core.topological_space_fiber FiberBundleCore.topologicalSpaceFiber
abbrev TotalSpace := Bundle.TotalSpace F Z.Fiber
#align fiber_bundle_core.total_space FiberBundleCore.TotalSpace
@[reducible, simp, mfld_simps]
def proj : Z.TotalSpace → B :=
Bundle.TotalSpace.proj
#align fiber_bundle_core.proj FiberBundleCore.proj
def trivChange (i j : ι) : PartialHomeomorph (B × F) (B × F) where
source := (Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j) ×ˢ univ
target := (Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j) ×ˢ univ
toFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange i j p.1 p.2⟩
invFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange j i p.1 p.2⟩
map_source' p hp := by simpa using hp
map_target' p hp := by simpa using hp
left_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_true, mem_univ] at hx
dsimp only
rw [coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self]
exacts [hx.1, ⟨⟨hx.1, hx.2⟩, hx.1⟩]
right_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_true_iff, mem_univ] at hx
dsimp only
rw [Z.coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self]
· exact hx.2
· simp [hx]
open_source := ((Z.isOpen_baseSet i).inter (Z.isOpen_baseSet j)).prod isOpen_univ
open_target := ((Z.isOpen_baseSet i).inter (Z.isOpen_baseSet j)).prod isOpen_univ
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_fst.continuousOn.prod (Z.continuousOn_coordChange i j)
continuousOn_invFun := by
simpa [inter_comm] using continuous_fst.continuousOn.prod (Z.continuousOn_coordChange j i)
#align fiber_bundle_core.triv_change FiberBundleCore.trivChange
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_trivChange_source (i j : ι) (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.trivChange i j).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i ∩ Z.baseSet j := by
erw [mem_prod]
simp
#align fiber_bundle_core.mem_triv_change_source FiberBundleCore.mem_trivChange_source
def localTrivAsPartialEquiv (i : ι) : PartialEquiv Z.TotalSpace (B × F) where
source := Z.proj ⁻¹' Z.baseSet i
target := Z.baseSet i ×ˢ univ
invFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange i (Z.indexAt p.1) p.1 p.2⟩
toFun p := ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt p.1) i p.1 p.2⟩
map_source' p hp := by
simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, and_true_iff, Set.mem_univ, Set.prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq] using hp
map_target' p hp := by
simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, and_true_iff, Set.mem_univ, Set.mem_prod] using hp
left_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
replace hx : x ∈ Z.baseSet i := hx
dsimp only
rw [Z.coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self] <;> apply_rules [mem_baseSet_at, mem_inter]
right_inv' := by
rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, and_true_iff, mem_univ] at hx
dsimp only
rw [Z.coordChange_comp, Z.coordChange_self]
exacts [hx, ⟨⟨hx, Z.mem_baseSet_at _⟩, hx⟩]
#align fiber_bundle_core.local_triv_as_local_equiv FiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv
variable (i : ι)
theorem mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_source (p : Z.TotalSpace) :
p ∈ (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).source ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i :=
Iff.rfl
#align fiber_bundle_core.mem_local_triv_as_local_equiv_source FiberBundleCore.mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_source
theorem mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_target (p : B × F) :
p ∈ (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).target ↔ p.1 ∈ Z.baseSet i := by
erw [mem_prod]
simp only [and_true_iff, mem_univ]
#align fiber_bundle_core.mem_local_triv_as_local_equiv_target FiberBundleCore.mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_target
theorem localTrivAsPartialEquiv_apply (p : Z.TotalSpace) :
(Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i) p = ⟨p.1, Z.coordChange (Z.indexAt p.1) i p.1 p.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align fiber_bundle_core.local_triv_as_local_equiv_apply FiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv_apply
| Mathlib/Topology/FiberBundle/Basic.lean | 528 | 540 | theorem localTrivAsPartialEquiv_trans (i j : ι) :
(Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv i).symm.trans (Z.localTrivAsPartialEquiv j) ≈
(Z.trivChange i j).toPartialEquiv := by |
constructor
· ext x
simp only [mem_localTrivAsPartialEquiv_target, mfld_simps]
rfl
· rintro ⟨x, v⟩ hx
simp only [trivChange, localTrivAsPartialEquiv, PartialEquiv.symm, true_and_iff,
Prod.mk.inj_iff, prod_mk_mem_set_prod_eq, PartialEquiv.trans_source, mem_inter_iff,
and_true_iff, mem_preimage, proj, mem_univ, eq_self_iff_true, (· ∘ ·),
PartialEquiv.coe_trans, TotalSpace.proj] at hx ⊢
simp only [Z.coordChange_comp, hx, mem_inter_iff, and_self_iff, mem_baseSet_at]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule
#align_import representation_theory.maschke from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Module MonoidAlgebra
namespace LinearMap
-- At first we work with any `[CommRing k]`, and add the assumption that
-- `[Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]` when it is required.
variable {k : Type u} [CommRing k] {G : Type u} [Group G]
variable {V : Type v} [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) V]
variable {W : Type w} [AddCommGroup W] [Module k W] [Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
variable [IsScalarTower k (MonoidAlgebra k G) W]
variable (π : W →ₗ[k] V)
def conjugate (g : G) : W →ₗ[k] V :=
.comp (.comp (GroupSMul.linearMap k V g⁻¹) π) (GroupSMul.linearMap k W g)
#align linear_map.conjugate LinearMap.conjugate
theorem conjugate_apply (g : G) (v : W) :
π.conjugate g v = MonoidAlgebra.single g⁻¹ (1 : k) • π (MonoidAlgebra.single g (1 : k) • v) :=
rfl
variable (i : V →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] W) (h : ∀ v : V, (π : W → V) (i v) = v)
section
theorem conjugate_i (g : G) (v : V) : (conjugate π g : W → V) (i v) = v := by
rw [conjugate_apply, ← i.map_smul, h, ← mul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_one, mul_left_inv,
← one_def, one_smul]
#align linear_map.conjugate_i LinearMap.conjugate_i
end
variable (G) [Fintype G]
def sumOfConjugates : W →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ g : G, π.conjugate g
#align linear_map.sum_of_conjugates LinearMap.sumOfConjugates
lemma sumOfConjugates_apply (v : W) : π.sumOfConjugates G v = ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v :=
LinearMap.sum_apply _ _ _
def sumOfConjugatesEquivariant : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V :=
MonoidAlgebra.equivariantOfLinearOfComm (π.sumOfConjugates G) fun g v => by
simp only [sumOfConjugates_apply, Finset.smul_sum, conjugate_apply]
refine Fintype.sum_bijective (· * g) (Group.mulRight_bijective g) _ _ fun i ↦ ?_
simp only [smul_smul, single_mul_single, mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left, one_mul]
#align linear_map.sum_of_conjugates_equivariant LinearMap.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant
theorem sumOfConjugatesEquivariant_apply (v : W) :
π.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant G v = ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v :=
π.sumOfConjugates_apply G v
section
variable [Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]
def equivariantProjection : W →ₗ[MonoidAlgebra k G] V :=
⅟(Fintype.card G : k) • π.sumOfConjugatesEquivariant G
#align linear_map.equivariant_projection LinearMap.equivariantProjection
theorem equivariantProjection_apply (v : W) :
π.equivariantProjection G v = ⅟(Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ g : G, π.conjugate g v := by
simp only [equivariantProjection, smul_apply, sumOfConjugatesEquivariant_apply]
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Maschke.lean | 129 | 133 | theorem equivariantProjection_condition (v : V) : (π.equivariantProjection G) (i v) = v := by |
rw [equivariantProjection_apply]
simp only [conjugate_i π i h]
rw [Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ, nsmul_eq_smul_cast k, smul_smul,
Invertible.invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.ToSquareZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivation
#align_import ring_theory.kaehler from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4b92a463033b5587bb011657e25e4710bfca7364"
suppress_compilation
section KaehlerDifferential
open scoped TensorProduct
open Algebra
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
abbrev KaehlerDifferential.ideal : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) :=
RingHom.ker (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S)
#align kaehler_differential.ideal KaehlerDifferential.ideal
variable {S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal (a : S) :
(1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] a - a ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) ∈ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
#align kaehler_differential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal
variable {R}
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
def Derivation.tensorProductTo (D : Derivation R S M) : S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift ((LinearMap.lsmul S (S →ₗ[R] M)).flip D.toLinearMap)
#align derivation.tensor_product_to Derivation.tensorProductTo
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul (D : Derivation R S M) (s t : S) :
D.tensorProductTo (s ⊗ₜ t) = s • D t := rfl
#align derivation.tensor_product_to_tmul Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul (D : Derivation R S M) (x y : S ⊗[R] S) :
D.tensorProductTo (x * y) =
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x • D.tensorProductTo y +
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R y • D.tensorProductTo x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [zero_mul, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [add_mul, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x₁ x₂
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [mul_zero, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [mul_add, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x y
simp only [TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo,
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, TensorProduct.lift.tmul',
TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul]
dsimp
rw [D.leibniz]
simp only [smul_smul, smul_add, mul_comm (x * y) x₁, mul_right_comm x₁ x₂, ← mul_assoc]
#align derivation.tensor_product_to_mul Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul
variable (R S)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal :
Submodule.span S (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· rintro x (hx : _ = _)
have : x - TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x := by
rw [hx, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]
rw [← this]
clear this hx
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [map_zero, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]; exact zero_mem _
· intro x y
have : x ⊗ₜ[R] y - (x * y) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x • ((1 : S) ⊗ₜ y - y ⊗ₜ (1 : S)) := by
simp_rw [smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul, this]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ x ?_
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact Set.mem_range_self y
· intro x y hx hy
rw [map_add, TensorProduct.add_tmul, ← sub_add_sub_comm]
exact add_mem hx hy
#align kaehler_differential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal :
Ideal.span (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· change (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S ≤ (Ideal.span _).restrictScalars S
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span]
conv_rhs => rw [← Submodule.span_span_of_tower S]
exact Submodule.subset_span
#align kaehler_differential.span_range_eq_ideal KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal
def KaehlerDifferential : Type v :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
#align kaehler_differential KaehlerDifferential
instance : AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential R S) := by
unfold KaehlerDifferential
infer_instance
instance KaehlerDifferential.module : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential R S) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.moduleOfTower _
#align kaehler_differential.module KaehlerDifferential.module
@[inherit_doc KaehlerDifferential]
notation:100 "Ω[" S "⁄" R "]" => KaehlerDifferential R S
instance : Nonempty (Ω[S⁄R]) := ⟨0⟩
instance KaehlerDifferential.module' {R' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [Algebra R' S]
[SMulCommClass R R' S] :
Module R' (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.module' _
#align kaehler_differential.module' KaehlerDifferential.module'
instance : IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.isScalarTower _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower {R₁ R₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂]
[Algebra R₁ S] [Algebra R₂ S] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[SMulCommClass R R₁ S] [SMulCommClass R R₂ S] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ S] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
#align kaehler_differential.is_scalar_tower_of_tower KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower' : IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
#align kaehler_differential.is_scalar_tower' KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower'
def KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S →ₗ[S ⊗[R] S] Ω[S⁄R] :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
#align kaehler_differential.from_ideal KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal
def KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap : S →ₗ[R] Ω[S⁄R] :=
((KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal R S).restrictScalars R).comp
((TensorProduct.includeRight.toLinearMap - TensorProduct.includeLeft.toLinearMap :
S →ₗ[R] S ⊗[R] S).codRestrict
((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars R)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R) :
_ →ₗ[R] _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_linear_map KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap
theorem KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_linear_map_apply KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply
def KaehlerDifferential.D : Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
{ toLinearMap := KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S
map_one_eq_zero' := by
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply, Ideal.toCotangent_apply]
congr
rw [sub_self]
leibniz' := fun a b => by
have : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul { x // x ∈ ideal R S } (Ω[S⁄R]) S (S ⊗[R] S) := inferInstance
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (M₂ := Ω[S⁄R]),
← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (M₂ := Ω[S⁄R]), ← map_add, Ideal.toCotangent_eq, pow_two]
convert Submodule.mul_mem_mul (KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R a : _)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R b : _) using 1
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk,
TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_sub, sub_mul, mul_comm b, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower,
smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ring_nf }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D KaehlerDifferential.D
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.D R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_apply KaehlerDifferential.D_apply
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation :
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = ⊤ := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩ := Ideal.toCotangent_surjective _ x
have : x ∈ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := hx
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal] at this
suffices ∃ hx, (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) by
exact this.choose_spec
refine Submodule.span_induction this ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine ⟨KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x, ?_⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply R S x⟩
· exact ⟨zero_mem _, Submodule.zero_mem _⟩
· rintro x y ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; exact ⟨add_mem hx₁ hy₁, Submodule.add_mem _ hx₂ hy₂⟩
· rintro r x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩;
exact ⟨((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S).smul_mem r hx₁,
Submodule.smul_mem _ r hx₂⟩
#align kaehler_differential.span_range_derivation KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation
variable {R S}
def Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential (D : Derivation R S M) : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M := by
refine LinearMap.comp ((((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) •
(⊤ : Submodule (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S))).restrictScalars S).liftQ ?_ ?_)
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv S _).symm.toLinearMap
· exact D.tensorProductTo.comp ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).subtype.restrictScalars S)
· intro x hx
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on hx ?_ ?_
· rintro x hx y -
rw [RingHom.mem_ker] at hx
dsimp
rw [Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul, hx, y.prop, zero_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· intro x y ex ey; rw [map_add, ex, ey, zero_add]
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply (D : Derivation R S M) (x) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x) =
D.tensorProductTo x := rfl
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential_apply Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Kaehler.lean | 287 | 293 | theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp (D : Derivation R S M) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = D := by |
ext a
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.D_apply]
refine (D.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply _).trans ?_
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, map_sub, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul,
one_smul, D.map_one_eq_zero, smul_zero, sub_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import topology.continuous_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
#align nhds_bind_nhds_within nhds_bind_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
#align eventually_nhds_nhds_within eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align eventually_nhds_within_iff eventually_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
#align frequently_nhds_within_iff frequently_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
#align mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
#align eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
#align nhds_within_eq nhdsWithin_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align nhds_within_univ nhdsWithin_univ
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s)
(t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
#align nhds_within_has_basis nhdsWithin_hasBasis
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
#align nhds_within_basis_open nhdsWithin_basis_open
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_compl diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_diff diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
#align nhds_of_nhds_within_of_nhds nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
#align nhds_within_eq_iff_eventually_eq nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
#align nhds_within_le_iff nhdsWithin_le_iff
-- Porting note: golfed, dropped an unneeded assumption
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced' preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced'ₓ
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
#align mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
#align self_mem_nhds_within self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
#align eventually_mem_nhds_within eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
#align inter_mem_nhds_within inter_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_mono (a : α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝[t] a :=
inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr h)
#align nhds_within_mono nhdsWithin_mono
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
#align pure_le_nhds_within pure_le_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
#align mem_of_mem_nhds_within mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds_within Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds_within tendsto_const_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
#align nhds_within_restrict'' nhdsWithin_restrict''
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
#align nhds_within_restrict' nhdsWithin_restrict'
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
#align nhds_within_restrict nhdsWithin_restrict
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
#align nhds_within_le_of_mem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
#align nhds_within_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within' nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin'
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds nhdsWithin_eq_nhds
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
#align is_open.nhds_within_eq IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced preimage_nhds_within_coinduced
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
#align nhds_within_empty nhdsWithin_empty
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
#align nhds_within_union nhdsWithin_union
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a :=
Set.Finite.induction_on hI (by simp) fun _ _ hT ↦ by
simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
#align nhds_within_bUnion nhdsWithin_biUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
#align nhds_within_sUnion nhdsWithin_sUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
#align nhds_within_Union nhdsWithin_iUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
#align nhds_within_inter nhdsWithin_inter
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
#align nhds_within_inter' nhdsWithin_inter'
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem' nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem'
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
#align nhds_within_singleton nhdsWithin_singleton
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
#align nhds_within_insert nhdsWithin_insert
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
#align mem_nhds_within_insert mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
#align insert_mem_nhds_iff insert_mem_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_within_compl_singleton_sup_pure nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure
theorem nhdsWithin_prod {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
#align nhds_within_prod nhdsWithin_prod
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq' nhdsWithin_pi_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq nhdsWithin_pi_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
#align nhds_within_pi_univ_eq nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : 𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq_bot nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : (𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_ne_bot nhdsWithin_pi_neBot
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
#align filter.tendsto.piecewise_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
#align filter.tendsto.if_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds_within map_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
#align eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhds_within eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhds_within tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
#align nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
#align is_closed.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
#align dense_range.nhds_within_ne_bot DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
#align mem_closure_pi mem_closure_pi
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
#align closure_pi_set closure_pi_set
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
#align dense_pi dense_pi
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_iff eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_of_eq_on eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
#align set.eq_on.eventually_eq_nhds_within Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
#align tendsto_nhds_within_congr tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_forall eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_range tendsto_nhdsWithin_range
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
#align filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds_within Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_eventually_nhds eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
#align mem_nhds_within_subtype mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
#align nhds_within_subtype nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
#align nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_coe nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
#align mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhds_within mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
#align continuous_on.continuous_within_at ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_within_at_univ continuousWithinAt_univ
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
#align continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 553 | 558 | theorem ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α} {y : β}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by |
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at *
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, Prod.map, nhds_prod_eq]
exact hf.prod_map hg
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Lattice
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Defs
#align_import measure_theory.pi_system from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
open MeasurableSpace Set
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory
def IsPiSystem {α} (C : Set (Set α)) : Prop :=
∀ᵉ (s ∈ C) (t ∈ C), (s ∩ t : Set α).Nonempty → s ∩ t ∈ C
#align is_pi_system IsPiSystem
theorem IsPiSystem.singleton {α} (S : Set α) : IsPiSystem ({S} : Set (Set α)) := by
intro s h_s t h_t _
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_s, Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 h_t, Set.inter_self,
Set.mem_singleton_iff]
#align is_pi_system.singleton IsPiSystem.singleton
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_empty {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert ∅ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
cases' hs with hs hs
· simp [hs]
· cases' ht with ht ht
· simp [ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
#align is_pi_system.insert_empty IsPiSystem.insert_empty
theorem IsPiSystem.insert_univ {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) :
IsPiSystem (insert Set.univ S) := by
intro s hs t ht hst
cases' hs with hs hs
· cases' ht with ht ht <;> simp [hs, ht]
· cases' ht with ht ht
· simp [hs, ht]
· exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (h_pi s hs t ht hst)
#align is_pi_system.insert_univ IsPiSystem.insert_univ
theorem IsPiSystem.comap {α β} {S : Set (Set β)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) (f : α → β) :
IsPiSystem { s : Set α | ∃ t ∈ S, f ⁻¹' t = s } := by
rintro _ ⟨s, hs_mem, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, ht_mem, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← Set.preimage_inter] at hst ⊢
exact ⟨s ∩ t, h_pi s hs_mem t ht_mem (nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage hst), rfl⟩
#align is_pi_system.comap IsPiSystem.comap
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le {α ι} (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) p) :
IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) := by
intro t1 ht1 t2 ht2 h
rw [Set.mem_iUnion] at ht1 ht2 ⊢
cases' ht1 with n ht1
cases' ht2 with m ht2
obtain ⟨k, hpnk, hpmk⟩ : ∃ k, p n ≤ p k ∧ p m ≤ p k := hp_directed n m
exact ⟨k, hp_pi k t1 (hpnk ht1) t2 (hpmk ht2) h⟩
#align is_pi_system_Union_of_directed_le isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le
theorem isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone {α ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] (p : ι → Set (Set α))
(hp_pi : ∀ n, IsPiSystem (p n)) (hp_mono : Monotone p) : IsPiSystem (⋃ n, p n) :=
isPiSystem_iUnion_of_directed_le p hp_pi (Monotone.directed_le hp_mono)
#align is_pi_system_Union_of_monotone isPiSystem_iUnion_of_monotone
inductive generatePiSystem {α} (S : Set (Set α)) : Set (Set α)
| base {s : Set α} (h_s : s ∈ S) : generatePiSystem S s
| inter {s t : Set α} (h_s : generatePiSystem S s) (h_t : generatePiSystem S t)
(h_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : generatePiSystem S (s ∩ t)
#align generate_pi_system generatePiSystem
theorem isPiSystem_generatePiSystem {α} (S : Set (Set α)) : IsPiSystem (generatePiSystem S) :=
fun _ h_s _ h_t h_nonempty => generatePiSystem.inter h_s h_t h_nonempty
#align is_pi_system_generate_pi_system isPiSystem_generatePiSystem
theorem subset_generatePiSystem_self {α} (S : Set (Set α)) : S ⊆ generatePiSystem S := fun _ =>
generatePiSystem.base
#align subset_generate_pi_system_self subset_generatePiSystem_self
theorem generatePiSystem_subset_self {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_S : IsPiSystem S) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ S := fun x h => by
induction' h with _ h_s s u _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u
· exact h_s
· exact h_S _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
#align generate_pi_system_subset_self generatePiSystem_subset_self
theorem generatePiSystem_eq {α} {S : Set (Set α)} (h_pi : IsPiSystem S) : generatePiSystem S = S :=
Set.Subset.antisymm (generatePiSystem_subset_self h_pi) (subset_generatePiSystem_self S)
#align generate_pi_system_eq generatePiSystem_eq
theorem generatePiSystem_mono {α} {S T : Set (Set α)} (hST : S ⊆ T) :
generatePiSystem S ⊆ generatePiSystem T := fun t ht => by
induction' ht with s h_s s u _ _ h_nonempty h_s h_u
· exact generatePiSystem.base (Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem hST h_s)
· exact isPiSystem_generatePiSystem T _ h_s _ h_u h_nonempty
#align generate_pi_system_mono generatePiSystem_mono
theorem generatePiSystem_measurableSet {α} [M : MeasurableSpace α] {S : Set (Set α)}
(h_meas_S : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) (h_in_pi : t ∈ generatePiSystem S) :
MeasurableSet t := by
induction' h_in_pi with s h_s s u _ _ _ h_s h_u
· apply h_meas_S _ h_s
· apply MeasurableSet.inter h_s h_u
#align generate_pi_system_measurable_set generatePiSystem_measurableSet
theorem generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem {α} {g : Set (Set α)} (t : Set α)
(ht : t ∈ generatePiSystem g) : MeasurableSet[generateFrom g] t :=
@generatePiSystem_measurableSet α (generateFrom g) g
(fun _ h_s_in_g => measurableSet_generateFrom h_s_in_g) t ht
#align generate_from_measurable_set_of_generate_pi_system generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem
theorem generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq {α} {g : Set (Set α)} :
generateFrom (generatePiSystem g) = generateFrom g := by
apply le_antisymm <;> apply generateFrom_le
· exact fun t h_t => generateFrom_measurableSet_of_generatePiSystem t h_t
· exact fun t h_t => measurableSet_generateFrom (generatePiSystem.base h_t)
#align generate_from_generate_pi_system_eq generateFrom_generatePiSystem_eq
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} (h_pi : ∀ b, IsPiSystem (g b))
(t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
induction' h_t with s h_s s t' h_gen_s h_gen_t' h_nonempty h_s h_t'
· rcases h_s with ⟨t', ⟨⟨b, rfl⟩, h_s_in_t'⟩⟩
refine ⟨{b}, fun _ => s, ?_⟩
simpa using h_s_in_t'
· rcases h_t' with ⟨T_t', ⟨f_t', ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
rcases h_s with ⟨T_s, ⟨f_s, ⟨rfl, h_s⟩⟩⟩
use T_s ∪ T_t', fun b : β =>
if b ∈ T_s then if b ∈ T_t' then f_s b ∩ f_t' b else f_s b
else if b ∈ T_t' then f_t' b else (∅ : Set α)
constructor
· ext a
simp_rw [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_iInter, Finset.mem_union, or_imp]
rw [← forall_and]
constructor <;> intro h1 b <;> by_cases hbs : b ∈ T_s <;> by_cases hbt : b ∈ T_t' <;>
specialize h1 b <;>
simp only [hbs, hbt, if_true, if_false, true_imp_iff, and_self_iff, false_imp_iff,
and_true_iff, true_and_iff] at h1 ⊢
all_goals exact h1
intro b h_b
split_ifs with hbs hbt hbt
· refine h_pi b (f_s b) (h_s b hbs) (f_t' b) (h_t' b hbt) (Set.Nonempty.mono ?_ h_nonempty)
exact Set.inter_subset_inter (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbs) (Set.biInter_subset_of_mem hbt)
· exact h_s b hbs
· exact h_t' b hbt
· rw [Finset.mem_union] at h_b
apply False.elim (h_b.elim hbs hbt)
#align mem_generate_pi_system_Union_elim mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim
theorem mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim' {α β} {g : β → Set (Set α)} {s : Set β}
(h_pi : ∀ b ∈ s, IsPiSystem (g b)) (t : Set α) (h_t : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b ∈ s, g b)) :
∃ (T : Finset β) (f : β → Set α), ↑T ⊆ s ∧ (t = ⋂ b ∈ T, f b) ∧ ∀ b ∈ T, f b ∈ g b := by
have : t ∈ generatePiSystem (⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b) := by
suffices h1 : ⋃ b : Subtype s, (g ∘ Subtype.val) b = ⋃ b ∈ s, g b by rwa [h1]
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.exists, Subtype.coe_mk]
rfl
rcases @mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim α (Subtype s) (g ∘ Subtype.val)
(fun b => h_pi b.val b.property) t this with
⟨T, ⟨f, ⟨rfl, h_t'⟩⟩⟩
refine
⟨T.image (fun x : s => (x : β)),
Function.extend (fun x : s => (x : β)) f fun _ : β => (∅ : Set α), by simp, ?_, ?_⟩
· ext a
constructor <;>
· simp (config := { proj := false }) only
[Set.mem_iInter, Subtype.forall, Finset.set_biInter_finset_image]
intro h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
have h2 := h1 b h_b h_b_in_T
revert h2
rw [Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply id
· intros b h_b
simp_rw [Finset.mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
at h_b
cases' h_b with h_b_w h_b_h
have h_b_alt : b = (Subtype.mk b h_b_w).val := rfl
rw [h_b_alt, Subtype.val_injective.extend_apply]
apply h_t'
apply h_b_h
#align mem_generate_pi_system_Union_elim' mem_generatePiSystem_iUnion_elim'
namespace MeasurableSpace
variable {α : Type*}
structure DynkinSystem (α : Type*) where
Has : Set α → Prop
has_empty : Has ∅
has_compl : ∀ {a}, Has a → Has aᶜ
has_iUnion_nat : ∀ {f : ℕ → Set α}, Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → (∀ i, Has (f i)) → Has (⋃ i, f i)
#align measurable_space.dynkin_system MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem
namespace DynkinSystem
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {d₁ d₂ : DynkinSystem α}, (∀ s : Set α, d₁.Has s ↔ d₂.Has s) → d₁ = d₂
| ⟨s₁, _, _, _⟩, ⟨s₂, _, _, _⟩, h => by
have : s₁ = s₂ := funext fun x => propext <| h x
subst this
rfl
#align measurable_space.dynkin_system.ext MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.ext
variable (d : DynkinSystem α)
theorem has_compl_iff {a} : d.Has aᶜ ↔ d.Has a :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using d.has_compl h, fun h => d.has_compl h⟩
#align measurable_space.dynkin_system.has_compl_iff MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.has_compl_iff
theorem has_univ : d.Has univ := by simpa using d.has_compl d.has_empty
#align measurable_space.dynkin_system.has_univ MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.has_univ
theorem has_iUnion {β} [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(h : ∀ i, d.Has (f i)) : d.Has (⋃ i, f i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
rw [← Encodable.iUnion_decode₂]
exact
d.has_iUnion_nat (Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_disjoint_on hd) fun n =>
Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_cases d.has_empty h
#align measurable_space.dynkin_system.has_Union MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.has_iUnion
theorem has_union {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : d.Has s₁) (h₂ : d.Has s₂) (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
d.Has (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]
exact d.has_iUnion (pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 h) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align measurable_space.dynkin_system.has_union MeasurableSpace.DynkinSystem.has_union
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/PiSystem.lean | 586 | 590 | theorem has_diff {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : d.Has s₁) (h₂ : d.Has s₂) (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) :
d.Has (s₁ \ s₂) := by |
apply d.has_compl_iff.1
simp only [diff_eq, compl_inter, compl_compl]
exact d.has_union (d.has_compl h₁) h₂ (disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import number_theory.divisors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
open scoped Classical
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
def divisors : Finset ℕ :=
Finset.filter (fun x : ℕ => x ∣ n) (Finset.Ico 1 (n + 1))
#align nat.divisors Nat.divisors
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ :=
Finset.filter (fun x : ℕ => x ∣ n) (Finset.Ico 1 n)
#align nat.proper_divisors Nat.properDivisors
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
Finset.filter (fun x => x.fst * x.snd = n) (Ico 1 (n + 1) ×ˢ Ico 1 (n + 1))
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : (Finset.range n.succ).filter (· ∣ n) = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
#align nat.filter_dvd_eq_divisors Nat.filter_dvd_eq_divisors
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
(Finset.range n).filter (· ∣ n) = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
#align nat.filter_dvd_eq_proper_divisors Nat.filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
#align nat.proper_divisors.not_self_mem Nat.properDivisors.not_self_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
#align nat.mem_proper_divisors Nat.mem_properDivisors
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
#align nat.insert_self_proper_divisors Nat.insert_self_properDivisors
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
#align nat.cons_self_proper_divisors Nat.cons_self_properDivisors
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true_iff, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
#align nat.mem_divisors Nat.mem_divisors
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
#align nat.one_mem_divisors Nat.one_mem_divisors
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
#align nat.mem_divisors_self Nat.mem_divisors_self
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, Finset.mem_Ico, Ne, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_product]
rw [and_comm]
apply and_congr_right
rintro rfl
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· rw [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.lt_add_one_iff]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp only [succ_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.1), succ_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.2),
true_and_iff]
exact
⟨Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.2),
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.1)⟩
#align nat.mem_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
cases' m with m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
#align nat.divisor_le Nat.divisor_le
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
#align nat.divisors_subset_of_dvd Nat.divisors_subset_of_dvd
theorem divisors_subset_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) (hdiff : m ≠ n) :
divisors m ⊆ properDivisors n := by
apply Finset.subset_iff.2
intro x hx
exact
Nat.mem_properDivisors.2
⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.1 hx).1.trans h,
lt_of_le_of_lt (divisor_le hx)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (divisor_le (Nat.mem_divisors.2 ⟨h, hzero⟩)) hdiff)⟩
#align nat.divisors_subset_proper_divisors Nat.divisors_subset_properDivisors
lemma divisors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {n m : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ∣ n) :
(n.divisors.filter (· ∣ m)) = m.divisors := by
ext k
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_divisors]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hkm⟩ ↦ ⟨hkm, ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hn hm⟩, fun ⟨hk, _⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hk.trans hm, hn⟩, hk⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem divisors_zero : divisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_zero Nat.divisors_zero
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_zero : properDivisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.proper_divisors_zero Nat.properDivisors_zero
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_divisors : (divisors n).Nonempty ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ hn ↦ by simp [hn] at hm, fun hn ↦ ⟨1, one_mem_divisors.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma divisors_eq_empty : divisors n = ∅ ↔ n = 0 :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans nonempty_divisors.not_left
theorem properDivisors_subset_divisors : properDivisors n ⊆ divisors n :=
filter_subset_filter _ <| Ico_subset_Ico_right n.le_succ
#align nat.proper_divisors_subset_divisors Nat.properDivisors_subset_divisors
@[simp]
theorem divisors_one : divisors 1 = {1} := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_one Nat.divisors_one
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_one : properDivisors 1 = ∅ := by rw [properDivisors, Ico_self, filter_empty]
#align nat.proper_divisors_one Nat.properDivisors_one
theorem pos_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.divisors) : 0 < m := by
cases m
· rw [mem_divisors, zero_dvd_iff (a := n)] at h
cases h.2 h.1
apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.pos_of_mem_divisors Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors
theorem pos_of_mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 0 < m :=
pos_of_mem_divisors (properDivisors_subset_divisors h)
#align nat.pos_of_mem_proper_divisors Nat.pos_of_mem_properDivisors
theorem one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt : 1 ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ 1 < n := by
rw [mem_properDivisors, and_iff_right (one_dvd _)]
#align nat.one_mem_proper_divisors_iff_one_lt Nat.one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt
@[simp]
lemma sup_divisors_id (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sup id = n := by
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ divisor_le) ?_
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· apply zero_le
· exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) <| mem_divisors_self n hn
lemma one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 1 < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (pos_of_mem_properDivisors h) (mem_properDivisors.1 h).2
lemma one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) :
1 < n / m := by
obtain ⟨h_dvd, h_lt⟩ := mem_properDivisors.mp h
rwa [Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt h_dvd, mul_one]
lemma mem_properDivisors_iff_exists {m n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
m ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ ∃ k > 1, n = m * k := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨n / m, one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors h, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_properDivisors.mp h).1).symm
· rintro ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hn
exact mem_properDivisors.mpr ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn.1) hk⟩
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_properDivisors : n.properDivisors.Nonempty ↔ 1 < n :=
⟨fun ⟨_m, hm⟩ ↦ one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors hm, fun hn ↦
⟨1, one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma properDivisors_eq_empty : n.properDivisors = ∅ ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_properDivisors, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_zero : divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal_zero Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal_zero
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_one : divisorsAntidiagonal 1 = {(1, 1)} := by
ext
simp [mul_eq_one, Prod.ext_iff]
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal_one Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal_one
-- @[simp]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.swap ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm, Prod.swap]
#align nat.swap_mem_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
-- Porting note: added below thm to replace the simp from the previous thm
@[simp]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal_aux {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.snd * x.fst = n ∧ ¬n = 0 ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm]
theorem fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.fst ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro _ h.1, h.2]
#align nat.fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal Nat.fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal
theorem snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.snd ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro_left _ h.1, h.2]
#align nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal Nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).map (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding = divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, Equiv.coe_prodComm,
Set.image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
ext
exact swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
#align nat.map_swap_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.fst = divisors n := by
ext
simp [Dvd.dvd, @eq_comm _ n (_ * _)]
#align nat.image_fst_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.snd = divisors n := by
rw [← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, map_eq_image, image_image]
exact image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
#align nat.image_snd_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal
theorem map_div_right_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (d, n / d), fun p₁ p₂ => congr_arg Prod.fst⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
ext ⟨d, nd⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, mem_divisors,
Prod.ext_iff, exists_prop, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, hn⟩, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt]
exact ⟨rfl, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨dvd_mul_right _ _, hn⟩, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt⟩
#align nat.map_div_right_divisors Nat.map_div_right_divisors
theorem map_div_left_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (n / d, d), fun p₁ p₂ => congr_arg Prod.snd⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
apply Finset.map_injective (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding
ext
rw [map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, ← map_div_right_divisors, Finset.map_map]
simp
#align nat.map_div_left_divisors Nat.map_div_left_divisors
theorem sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self :
∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = (∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i) + n := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· rw [← cons_self_properDivisors hn, Finset.sum_cons, add_comm]
#align nat.sum_divisors_eq_sum_proper_divisors_add_self Nat.sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self
def Perfect (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n ∧ 0 < n
#align nat.perfect Nat.Perfect
theorem perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors (h : 0 < n) : Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n :=
and_iff_left h
#align nat.perfect_iff_sum_proper_divisors Nat.perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors
theorem perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul (h : 0 < n) :
Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = 2 * n := by
rw [perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors h, sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self, two_mul]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h]
· apply add_right_cancel h
#align nat.perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul Nat.perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul
theorem mem_divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) {x : ℕ} :
x ∈ divisors (p ^ k) ↔ ∃ j ≤ k, x = p ^ j := by
rw [mem_divisors, Nat.dvd_prime_pow pp, and_iff_left (ne_of_gt (pow_pos pp.pos k))]
#align nat.mem_divisors_prime_pow Nat.mem_divisors_prime_pow
theorem Prime.divisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : divisors p = {1, p} := by
ext
rw [mem_divisors, dvd_prime pp, and_iff_left pp.ne_zero, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
#align nat.prime.divisors Nat.Prime.divisors
theorem Prime.properDivisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : properDivisors p = {1} := by
rw [← erase_insert properDivisors.not_self_mem, insert_self_properDivisors pp.ne_zero,
pp.divisors, pair_comm, erase_insert fun con => pp.ne_one (mem_singleton.1 con)]
#align nat.prime.proper_divisors Nat.Prime.properDivisors
theorem divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) :
divisors (p ^ k) = (Finset.range (k + 1)).map ⟨(p ^ ·), Nat.pow_right_injective pp.two_le⟩ := by
ext a
rw [mem_divisors_prime_pow pp]
simp [Nat.lt_succ, eq_comm]
#align nat.divisors_prime_pow Nat.divisors_prime_pow
theorem divisors_injective : Function.Injective divisors :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective sup_divisors_id
@[simp]
theorem divisors_inj {a b : ℕ} : a.divisors = b.divisors ↔ a = b :=
divisors_injective.eq_iff
theorem eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum {s : Finset ℕ} (hsub : s ⊆ n.properDivisors) :
((∑ x ∈ s, x) = ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x) → s = n.properDivisors := by
cases n
· rw [properDivisors_zero, subset_empty] at hsub
simp [hsub]
classical
rw [← sum_sdiff hsub]
intro h
apply Subset.antisymm hsub
rw [← sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
contrapose h
rw [← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h
apply ne_of_lt
rw [← zero_add (∑ x ∈ s, x), ← add_assoc, add_zero]
apply add_lt_add_right
have hlt :=
sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty h fun x hx => pos_of_mem_properDivisors (sdiff_subset hx)
simp only [sum_const_zero] at hlt
apply hlt
#align nat.eq_proper_divisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum Nat.eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum
theorem sum_properDivisors_dvd (h : (∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x) ∣ n) :
∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = 1 ∨ ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = n := by
cases' n with n
· simp
· cases' n with n
· simp at h
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro ne_n
have hlt : ∑ x ∈ n.succ.succ.properDivisors, x < n.succ.succ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos _) h) ne_n
symm
rw [← mem_singleton, eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum (singleton_subset_iff.2
(mem_properDivisors.2 ⟨h, hlt⟩)) (sum_singleton _ _), mem_properDivisors]
exact ⟨one_dvd _, Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.succ_pos _)⟩
#align nat.sum_proper_divisors_dvd Nat.sum_properDivisors_dvd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Prime.prod_properDivisors {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
∏ x ∈ p.properDivisors, f x = f 1 := by simp [h.properDivisors]
#align nat.prime.prod_proper_divisors Nat.Prime.prod_properDivisors
#align nat.prime.sum_proper_divisors Nat.Prime.sum_properDivisors
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 440 | 442 | theorem Prime.prod_divisors {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
∏ x ∈ p.divisors, f x = f p * f 1 := by |
rw [← cons_self_properDivisors h.ne_zero, prod_cons, h.prod_properDivisors]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.ConjFinite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Center
open MulAction ConjClasses
variable (G : Type*) [Group G]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/ClassEquation.lean | 31 | 35 | theorem sum_conjClasses_card_eq_card [Fintype <| ConjClasses G] [Fintype G]
[∀ x : ConjClasses G, Fintype x.carrier] :
∑ x : ConjClasses G, x.carrier.toFinset.card = Fintype.card G := by |
suffices (Σ x : ConjClasses G, x.carrier) ≃ G by simpa using (Fintype.card_congr this)
simpa [carrier_eq_preimage_mk] using Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv ConjClasses.mk
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Ordering.Lemmas
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.notation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b67044ba53af18680e1dd246861d9584e968495d"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Ordinal Order
-- Porting note: the generated theorem is warned by `simpNF`.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
inductive ONote : Type
| zero : ONote
| oadd : ONote → ℕ+ → ONote → ONote
deriving DecidableEq
#align onote ONote
compile_inductive% ONote
namespace ONote
instance : Zero ONote :=
⟨zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : zero = 0 :=
rfl
#align onote.zero_def ONote.zero_def
instance : Inhabited ONote :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One ONote :=
⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
def omega : ONote :=
oadd 1 1 0
#align onote.omega ONote.omega
@[simp]
noncomputable def repr : ONote → Ordinal.{0}
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
#align onote.repr ONote.repr
def toStringAux1 (e : ONote) (n : ℕ) (s : String) : String :=
if e = 0 then toString n
else (if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++ if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ toString n
#align onote.to_string_aux1 ONote.toStringAux1
def toString : ONote → String
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n 0 => toStringAux1 e n (toString e)
| oadd e n a => toStringAux1 e n (toString e) ++ " + " ++ toString a
#align onote.to_string ONote.toString
open Lean in
def repr' (prec : ℕ) : ONote → Format
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n a =>
Repr.addAppParen
("oadd " ++ (repr' max_prec e) ++ " " ++ Nat.repr (n : ℕ) ++ " " ++ (repr' max_prec a))
prec
#align onote.repr' ONote.repr
instance : ToString ONote :=
⟨toString⟩
instance : Repr ONote where
reprPrec o prec := repr' prec o
instance : Preorder ONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
theorem lt_def {x y : ONote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y :=
Iff.rfl
#align onote.lt_def ONote.lt_def
theorem le_def {x y : ONote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y :=
Iff.rfl
#align onote.le_def ONote.le_def
instance : WellFoundedRelation ONote :=
⟨(· < ·), InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf⟩
@[coe]
def ofNat : ℕ → ONote
| 0 => 0
| Nat.succ n => oadd 0 n.succPNat 0
#align onote.of_nat ONote.ofNat
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
@[simp] theorem ofNat_zero : ofNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_succ (n) : ofNat (Nat.succ n) = oadd 0 n.succPNat 0 :=
rfl
instance nat (n : ℕ) : OfNat ONote n where
ofNat := ofNat n
@[simp 1200]
theorem ofNat_one : ofNat 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align onote.of_nat_one ONote.ofNat_one
@[simp]
theorem repr_ofNat (n : ℕ) : repr (ofNat n) = n := by cases n <;> simp
#align onote.repr_of_nat ONote.repr_ofNat
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem repr_one : repr (ofNat 1) = (1 : ℕ) := repr_ofNat 1
#align onote.repr_one ONote.repr_one
theorem omega_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos).2 (natCast_le.2 n.2)
#align onote.omega_le_oadd ONote.omega_le_oadd
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ (ω ^ repr e) _ (opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos) (omega_le_oadd e n a)
#align onote.oadd_pos ONote.oadd_pos
def cmp : ONote → ONote → Ordering
| 0, 0 => Ordering.eq
| _, 0 => Ordering.gt
| 0, _ => Ordering.lt
| _o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), _o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) =>
(cmp e₁ e₂).orElse <| (_root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂).orElse (cmp a₁ a₂)
#align onote.cmp ONote.cmp
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = Ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0, 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, h => by injection h
| 0, oadd e n a, h => by injection h
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h => by
revert h; simp only [cmp]
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁
revert h; cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h
rw [_root_.cmp, cmpUsing_eq_eq] at h₂
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp h₂)
simp
#align onote.eq_of_cmp_eq ONote.eq_of_cmp_eq
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ONote) < 1 := by
simp only [lt_def, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
zero_lt_one]
#align onote.zero_lt_one ONote.zero_lt_one
inductive NFBelow : ONote → Ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NFBelow 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NFBelow e eb → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
#align onote.NF_below ONote.NFBelow
class NF (o : ONote) : Prop where
out : Exists (NFBelow o)
#align onote.NF ONote.NF
instance NF.zero : NF 0 :=
⟨⟨0, NFBelow.zero⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.zero ONote.NF.zero
theorem NFBelow.oadd {e n a b} : NF e → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => NFBelow.oadd' h
#align onote.NF_below.oadd ONote.NFBelow.oadd
theorem NFBelow.fst {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NF e := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
#align onote.NF_below.fst ONote.NFBelow.fst
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.fst
#align onote.NF.fst ONote.NF.fst
theorem NFBelow.snd {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NFBelow a (repr e) := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₂
#align onote.NF_below.snd ONote.NFBelow.snd
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NFBelow a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.snd
#align onote.NF.snd' ONote.NF.snd'
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.snd ONote.NF.snd
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n) (h₂ : NFBelow a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NFBelow.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.oadd ONote.NF.oadd
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (ONote.oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NFBelow.zero
#align onote.NF.oadd_zero ONote.NF.oadd_zero
theorem NFBelow.lt {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₃
#align onote.NF_below.lt ONote.NFBelow.lt
theorem NFBelow_zero : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (Ordinal.zero_le _), fun e => e.symm ▸ NFBelow.zero⟩
#align onote.NF_below_zero ONote.NFBelow_zero
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 := by
simpa [e0, NFBelow_zero] using h.snd'
#align onote.NF.zero_of_zero ONote.NF.zero_of_zero
theorem NFBelow.repr_lt {o b} (h : NFBelow o b) : repr o < ω ^ b := by
induction' h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH
· exact opow_pos _ omega_pos
· rw [repr]
apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) _).trans
rw [← opow_succ]
exact opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (succ_le_of_lt h₃)
#align onote.NF_below.repr_lt ONote.NFBelow.repr_lt
theorem NFBelow.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NFBelow o b₁) : NFBelow o b₂ := by
induction' h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ _ <;> constructor
exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
#align onote.NF_below.mono ONote.NFBelow.mono
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) :
NF (ONote.oadd e n a) → NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨b', h⟩⟩ => by (cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact NFBelow.oadd' h₁ h₂ H)
#align onote.NF.below_of_lt ONote.NF.below_of_lt
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NFBelow o b
| 0, _, _, _ => NFBelow.zero
| ONote.oadd _ _ _, _, H, h =>
h.below_of_lt <|
(opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (omega_le_oadd _ _ _) H
#align onote.NF.below_of_lt' ONote.NF.below_of_lt'
theorem nfBelow_ofNat : ∀ n, NFBelow (ofNat n) 1
| 0 => NFBelow.zero
| Nat.succ _ => NFBelow.oadd NF.zero NFBelow.zero zero_lt_one
#align onote.NF_below_of_nat ONote.nfBelow_ofNat
instance nf_ofNat (n) : NF (ofNat n) :=
⟨⟨_, nfBelow_ofNat n⟩⟩
#align onote.NF_of_nat ONote.nf_ofNat
instance nf_one : NF 1 := by rw [← ofNat_one]; infer_instance
#align onote.NF_one ONote.nf_one
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ (repr (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) _ _
(NF.below_of_lt h h₁).repr_lt (omega_le_oadd e₂ n₂ o₂)
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_1 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_1
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : ONote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+} (h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁ : ℕ) < n₂) :
oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ := by
simp only [lt_def, repr]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt) (le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _))
rwa [← mul_succ,Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left (opow_pos _ omega_pos), succ_le_iff, natCast_lt]
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_2 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_2
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) : oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ := by
rw [lt_def]; unfold repr
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ (repr a₁) _ h _
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_3 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_3
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : ONote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).Compares a b
| 0, 0, _, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0, oadd e n a, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂), h₁, h₂ => by -- TODO: golf
rw [cmp]
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
simp only [Ordering.Compares, gt_iff_lt] at IHe; revert IHe
cases cmp e₁ e₂
case lt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe
case gt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe
case eq =>
intro IHe; dsimp at IHe; subst IHe
unfold _root_.cmp; cases nh : cmpUsing (· < ·) (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;>
rw [cmpUsing, ite_eq_iff, not_lt] at nh
case lt =>
cases' nh with nh nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh.left
· rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; cases' nh.right with nh nh <;> cases nh <;> contradiction
case gt =>
cases' nh with nh nh
· cases nh; contradiction
· cases' nh with _ nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; cases' nh with nh nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh.left
· cases nh; contradiction
cases' nh with nh nh
· cases nh; contradiction
cases' nh with nhl nhr
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nhr
cases' nhr with nhr nhr
· cases nhr; contradiction
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp ⟨(not_lt_of_ge nhl), nhr.left⟩)
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd
revert IHa; cases cmp a₁ a₂ <;> intro IHa <;> dsimp at IHa
case lt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
case gt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
subst IHa; exact rfl
#align onote.cmp_compares ONote.cmp_compares
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun e => match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| Ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b) => (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| Ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b)=> (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| Ordering.eq, h => h,
congr_arg _⟩
#align onote.repr_inj ONote.repr_inj
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega_opow {b e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a))
(d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 (fun h => by injection h : ONote.oadd e n a ≠ 0)
have L := le_of_not_lt fun l => not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)
simp only [repr] at d
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff <| (opow_dvd_opow _ L).mul_right _).1 d⟩
#align onote.NF.of_dvd_omega_opow ONote.NF.of_dvd_omega_opow
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a := by
(rw [← opow_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega_opow)
#align onote.NF.of_dvd_omega ONote.NF.of_dvd_omega
def TopBelow (b : ONote) : ONote → Prop
| 0 => True
| oadd e _ _ => cmp e b = Ordering.lt
#align onote.top_below ONote.TopBelow
instance decidableTopBelow : DecidableRel TopBelow := by
intro b o
cases o <;> delta TopBelow <;> infer_instance
#align onote.decidable_top_below ONote.decidableTopBelow
theorem nfBelow_iff_topBelow {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ TopBelow b o
| 0 => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, trivial⟩, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
h₁.below_of_lt <| (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
#align onote.NF_below_iff_top_below ONote.nfBelow_iff_topBelow
instance decidableNF : DecidablePred NF
| 0 => isTrue NF.zero
| oadd e n a => by
have := decidableNF e
have := decidableNF a
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ TopBelow e a)
rw [← and_congr_right fun h => @nfBelow_iff_topBelow _ h _]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩
#align onote.decidable_NF ONote.decidableNF
def addAux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ+) (o : ONote) : ONote :=
match o with
| 0 => oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') =>
match cmp e e' with
| Ordering.lt => o'
| Ordering.eq => oadd e (n + n') a'
| Ordering.gt => oadd e n o'
def add : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, o => o
| oadd e n a, o => addAux e n (add a o)
#align onote.add ONote.add
instance : Add ONote :=
⟨add⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_add (o : ONote) : 0 + o = o :=
rfl
#align onote.zero_add ONote.zero_add
theorem oadd_add (e n a o) : oadd e n a + o = addAux e n (a + o) :=
rfl
#align onote.oadd_add ONote.oadd_add
def sub : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| o, 0 => o
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
match cmp e₁ e₂ with
| Ordering.lt => 0
| Ordering.gt => o₁
| Ordering.eq =>
match (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ with
| 0 => if n₁ = n₂ then sub a₁ a₂ else 0
| Nat.succ k => oadd e₁ k.succPNat a₁
#align onote.sub ONote.sub
instance : Sub ONote :=
⟨sub⟩
theorem add_nfBelow {b} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, NFBelow o₁ b → NFBelow o₂ b → NFBelow (o₁ + o₂) b
| 0, _, _, h₂ => h₂
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := add_nfBelow (h₁.snd.mono <| le_of_lt h₁.lt) h₂
simp [oadd_add]; revert h'; cases' a + o with e' n' a' <;> intro h'
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst NFBelow.zero h₁.lt
have : ((e.cmp e').Compares e e') := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h'.fst
cases h: cmp e e' <;> dsimp [addAux] <;> simp [h]
· exact h'
· simp [h] at this
subst e'
exact NFBelow.oadd h'.fst h'.snd h'.lt
· simp [h] at this
exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst (NF.below_of_lt this ⟨⟨_, h'⟩⟩) h₁.lt
#align onote.add_NF_below ONote.add_nfBelow
instance add_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ + o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, h₂⟩⟩ =>
⟨(le_total b₁ b₂).elim (fun h => ⟨b₂, add_nfBelow (h₁.mono h) h₂⟩) fun h =>
⟨b₁, add_nfBelow h₁ (h₂.mono h)⟩⟩
#align onote.add_NF ONote.add_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_add : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ + o₂) = repr o₁ + repr o₂
| 0, o, _, _ => by simp
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; have h' := repr_add a o
conv_lhs at h' => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
have nf := ONote.add_nf a o
conv at nf => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
conv in _ + o => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
cases' h : add a o with e' n' a' <;>
simp only [Add.add, add, addAux, h'.symm, h, add_assoc, repr] at nf h₁ ⊢
have := h₁.fst; haveI := nf.fst; have ee := cmp_compares e e'
cases he: cmp e e' <;> simp only [he, Ordering.compares_gt, Ordering.compares_lt,
Ordering.compares_eq, repr, gt_iff_lt, PNat.add_coe, Nat.cast_add] at ee ⊢
· rw [← add_assoc, @add_absorp _ (repr e') (ω ^ repr e' * (n' : ℕ))]
· have := (h₁.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt
unfold repr at this
cases he': e' <;> simp only [he', zero_def, opow_zero, repr, gt_iff_lt] at this ⊢ <;>
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) this
· simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e') omega_pos).2
(natCast_le.2 n'.pos)
· rw [ee, ← add_assoc, ← mul_add]
#align onote.repr_add ONote.repr_add
theorem sub_nfBelow : ∀ {o₁ o₂ b}, NFBelow o₁ b → NF o₂ → NFBelow (o₁ - o₂) b
| 0, o, b, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NFBelow.zero
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, h₁, _ => h₁
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := sub_nfBelow h₁.snd h₂.snd
simp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub] at h' ⊢
have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp [sub]
· apply NFBelow.zero
· simp only [h, Ordering.compares_eq] at this
subst e₂
cases (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> simp [sub]
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂ <;> simp [en]
· exact h'.mono (le_of_lt h₁.lt)
· exact NFBelow.zero
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd h₁.lt
· exact h₁
#align onote.sub_NF_below ONote.sub_nfBelow
instance sub_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ - o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, h₂ => ⟨⟨b₁, sub_nfBelow h₁ h₂⟩⟩
#align onote.sub_NF ONote.sub_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_sub : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ - o₂) = repr o₁ - repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (Ordinal.zero_sub _).symm
| oadd e n a, 0, _, _ => (Ordinal.sub_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; haveI := h₂.snd; have h' := repr_sub a₁ a₂
conv_lhs at h' => dsimp [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub]
conv_lhs => dsimp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub]; dsimp only [sub]
have ee := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp only [h] at ee
· rw [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2]
· rfl
exact le_of_lt (oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ ee)
· change e₁ = e₂ at ee
subst e₂
dsimp only
cases mn : (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> dsimp only
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂
· simpa [en]
· simp only [en, ite_false]
exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 <|
le_of_lt <|
oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ <|
lt_of_le_of_ne (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 mn) (mt PNat.eq en)).symm
· simp [Nat.succPNat]
rw [(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ mn).1 mn, add_comm,
Nat.cast_add, mul_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_cancel]
refine
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp h₂.snd'.repr_lt <| le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)).symm
simpa using mul_le_mul_left' (natCast_le.2 <| Nat.succ_pos _) _
· exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp (h₂.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt <| omega_le_oadd _ _ _).symm
#align onote.repr_sub ONote.repr_sub
def mul : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (mul o₁ a₂)
#align onote.mul ONote.mul
instance : Mul ONote :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : MulZeroClass ONote where
mul := (· * ·)
zero := 0
zero_mul o := by cases o <;> rfl
mul_zero o := by cases o <;> rfl
theorem oadd_mul (e₁ n₁ a₁ e₂ n₂ a₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * a₂) :=
rfl
#align onote.oadd_mul ONote.oadd_mul
theorem oadd_mul_nfBelow {e₁ n₁ a₁ b₁} (h₁ : NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) b₁) :
∀ {o₂ b₂}, NFBelow o₂ b₂ → NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * o₂) (repr e₁ + b₂)
| 0, b₂, _ => NFBelow.zero
| oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b₂, h₂ => by
have IH := oadd_mul_nfBelow h₁ h₂.snd
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp [e0, oadd_mul]
· apply NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr e₁)).2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Ordinal.zero_le _) h₂.lt)
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
apply NFBelow.oadd
· infer_instance
· rwa [repr_add]
· rw [repr_add, add_lt_add_iff_left]
exact h₂.lt
#align onote.oadd_mul_NF_below ONote.oadd_mul_nfBelow
instance mul_nf : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ * o₂)
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NF.zero
| oadd e n a, o, ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨_, oadd_mul_nfBelow hb₁ hb₂⟩⟩
#align onote.mul_NF ONote.mul_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_mul : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ * o₂) = repr o₁ * repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (zero_mul _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, 0, _, _ => (mul_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
have IH : repr (mul _ _) = _ := @repr_mul _ _ h₁ h₂.snd
conv =>
lhs
simp [(· * ·)]
have ao : repr a₁ + ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) = ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) := by
apply add_absorp h₁.snd'.repr_lt
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos _ omega_pos).2 (natCast_le.2 n₁.2)
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp [e0, mul]
· cases' Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero n₂.ne_zero with x xe
simp only [xe, h₂.zero_of_zero e0, repr, add_zero]
rw [natCast_succ x, add_mul_succ _ ao, mul_assoc]
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
simp only [Mul.mul, mul, e0, ite_false, repr.eq_2, repr_add, opow_add, IH, repr, mul_add]
rw [← mul_assoc]
congr 2
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [add_mul_limit ao (opow_isLimit_left omega_isLimit this), mul_assoc,
mul_omega_dvd (natCast_pos.2 n₁.pos) (nat_lt_omega _)]
simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
#align onote.repr_mul ONote.repr_mul
def split' : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split' a
(oadd (e - 1) n a', m)
#align onote.split' ONote.split'
def split : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split a
(oadd e n a', m)
#align onote.split ONote.split
def scale (x : ONote) : ONote → ONote
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => oadd (x + e) n (scale x a)
#align onote.scale ONote.scale
def mulNat : ONote → ℕ → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| oadd e n a, m + 1 => oadd e (n * m.succPNat) a
#align onote.mul_nat ONote.mulNat
def opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) : ℕ → ℕ → ONote
| _, 0 => 0
| 0, m + 1 => oadd e m.succPNat 0
| k + 1, m => scale (e + mulNat a0 k) a + (opowAux e a0 a k m)
#align onote.opow_aux ONote.opowAux
def opowAux2 (o₂ : ONote) (o₁ : ONote × ℕ) : ONote :=
match o₁ with
| (0, 0) => if o₂ = 0 then 1 else 0
| (0, 1) => 1
| (0, m + 1) =>
let (b', k) := split' o₂
oadd b' (m.succPNat ^ k) 0
| (a@(oadd a0 _ _), m) =>
match split o₂ with
| (b, 0) => oadd (a0 * b) 1 0
| (b, k + 1) =>
let eb := a0 * b
scale (eb + mulNat a0 k) a + opowAux eb a0 (mulNat a m) k m
def opow (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : ONote := opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁)
#align onote.opow ONote.opow
instance : Pow ONote ONote :=
⟨opow⟩
theorem opow_def (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : o₁ ^ o₂ = opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁) :=
rfl
#align onote.opow_def ONote.opow_def
theorem split_eq_scale_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → split o = (scale 1 o', m)
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; rfl
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· revert p
cases' h' : split' a with a' m'
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
simp only [split_eq_scale_split' h', and_imp]
have : 1 + (e - 1) = e := by
refine repr_inj.1 ?_
simp only [repr_add, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
repr_sub]
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
refine Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le ?_
have := one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this
exact this
intros
substs o' m
simp [scale, this]
#align onote.split_eq_scale_split' ONote.split_eq_scale_split'
theorem nf_repr_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → NF o' ∧ repr o = ω * repr o' + m
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; simp [NF.zero]
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp [h.zero_of_zero e0, NF.zero]
· revert p
cases' h' : split' a with a' m'
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
cases' nf_repr_split' h' with IH₁ IH₂
simp only [IH₂, and_imp]
intros
substs o' m
have : (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e = ω ^ (1 : Ordinal.{0}) * ω ^ (repr e - 1) := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)]
refine ⟨NF.oadd (by infer_instance) _ ?_, ?_⟩
· simp at this ⊢
refine
IH₁.below_of_lt'
((Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left omega_pos).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ m') ?_)
rw [← this, ← IH₂]
exact h.snd'.repr_lt
· rw [this]
simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
#align onote.NF_repr_split' ONote.nf_repr_split'
theorem scale_eq_mul (x) [NF x] : ∀ (o) [NF o], scale x o = oadd x 1 0 * o
| 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, h => by
simp only [HMul.hMul]; simp only [scale]
haveI := h.snd
by_cases e0 : e = 0
· simp_rw [scale_eq_mul]
simp [Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, e0, h.zero_of_zero,
show x + 0 = x from repr_inj.1 (by simp)]
· simp [e0, Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, (· * ·)]
#align onote.scale_eq_mul ONote.scale_eq_mul
instance nf_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : NF (scale x o) := by
rw [scale_eq_mul]
infer_instance
#align onote.NF_scale ONote.nf_scale
@[simp]
theorem repr_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : repr (scale x o) = ω ^ repr x * repr o := by
simp only [scale_eq_mul, repr_mul, repr, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero]
#align onote.repr_scale ONote.repr_scale
theorem nf_repr_split {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : NF o' ∧ repr o = repr o' + m := by
cases' e : split' o with a n
cases' nf_repr_split' e with s₁ s₂
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; substs o' n
simp only [repr_scale, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
opow_one, s₂.symm, and_true]
infer_instance
#align onote.NF_repr_split ONote.nf_repr_split
theorem split_dvd {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : ω ∣ repr o' := by
cases' e : split' o with a n
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; subst o'
cases nf_repr_split' e; simp
#align onote.split_dvd ONote.split_dvd
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Notation.lean | 801 | 806 | theorem split_add_lt {o e n a m} [NF o] (h : split o = (oadd e n a, m)) :
repr a + m < ω ^ repr e := by |
cases' nf_repr_split h with h₁ h₂
cases' h₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd h) with e0 d
apply principal_add_omega_opow _ h₁.snd'.repr_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_omega _) _)
simpa using opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.ring.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"76de8ae01554c3b37d66544866659ff174e66e1f"
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {R : Type x}
open Function
class Distrib (R : Type*) extends Mul R, Add R where
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align distrib Distrib
class LeftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
#align left_distrib_class LeftDistribClass
class RightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align right_distrib_class RightDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.leftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] : LeftDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.left_distrib⟩
#align distrib.left_distrib_class Distrib.leftDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.rightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] :
RightDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.right_distrib⟩
#align distrib.right_distrib_class Distrib.rightDistribClass
theorem left_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
LeftDistribClass.left_distrib a b c
#align left_distrib left_distrib
alias mul_add := left_distrib
#align mul_add mul_add
theorem right_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
(a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
RightDistribClass.right_distrib a b c
#align right_distrib right_distrib
alias add_mul := right_distrib
#align add_mul add_mul
theorem distrib_three_right [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c d : R) :
(a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d := by simp [right_distrib]
#align distrib_three_right distrib_three_right
class NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends AddCommMonoid α, Distrib α, MulZeroClass α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_semiring NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
class NonUnitalSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, SemigroupWithZero α
#align non_unital_semiring NonUnitalSemiring
class NonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, MulZeroOneClass α,
AddCommMonoidWithOne α
#align non_assoc_semiring NonAssocSemiring
class NonUnitalNonAssocRing (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_ring NonUnitalNonAssocRing
class NonUnitalRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonUnitalSemiring α
#align non_unital_ring NonUnitalRing
class NonAssocRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonAssocSemiring α,
AddCommGroupWithOne α
#align non_assoc_ring NonAssocRing
class Semiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalSemiring α, NonAssocSemiring α, MonoidWithZero α
#align semiring Semiring
class Ring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, AddCommGroup R, AddGroupWithOne R
#align ring Ring
section DistribMulOneClass
variable [Add α] [MulOneClass α]
theorem add_one_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (a + 1) * b = a * b + b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align add_one_mul add_one_mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean | 160 | 161 | theorem mul_add_one [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a := by |
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
#align_import order.filter.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
protected def prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter (α × β) :=
f.comap Prod.fst ⊓ g.comap Prod.snd
#align filter.prod Filter.prod
instance instSProd : SProd (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter (α × β)) where
sprod := Filter.prod
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
#align filter.prod_mem_prod Filter.prod_mem_prod
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
#align filter.mem_prod_iff Filter.mem_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_mem_prod_iff Filter.prod_mem_prod_iff
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
#align filter.mem_prod_principal Filter.mem_prod_principal
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align filter.mem_prod_top Filter.mem_prod_top
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
#align filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff Filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
erw [comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_prod Filter.comap_prod
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
#align filter.prod_top Filter.prod_top
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_right, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.sup_prod Filter.sup_prod
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_left, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.prod_sup Filter.prod_sup
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
#align filter.eventually_prod_iff Filter.eventually_prod_iff
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_fst Filter.tendsto_fst
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_snd Filter.tendsto_snd
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prod_mk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prod_mk tendsto_fst
#align filter.tendsto_prod_swap Filter.tendsto_prod_swap
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl Filter.Eventually.prod_inl
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr Filter.Eventually.prod_inr
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk Filter.Eventually.prod_mk
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_map {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_map Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_map
theorem EventuallyLE.prod_map {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
#align filter.eventually_le.prod_map Filter.EventuallyLE.prod_map
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
#align filter.eventually.curry Filter.Eventually.curry
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_left Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_left
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_right Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_right
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
#align filter.tendsto_diag Filter.tendsto_diag
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_left Filter.prod_iInf_left
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_right Filter.prod_iInf_right
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
#align filter.prod_mono Filter.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
#align filter.prod_mono_left Filter.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
#align filter.prod_mono_right Filter.prod_mono_right
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, comap_inf, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.prod_comap_comap_eq Filter.prod_comap_comap_eq
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
#align filter.prod_comm' Filter.prod_comm'
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
#align filter.prod_comm Filter.prod_comm
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
#align filter.map_fst_prod Filter.map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
#align filter.map_snd_prod Filter.map_snd_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_le_prod Filter.prod_le_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
#align filter.prod_inj Filter.prod_inj
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
#align filter.eventually_swap_iff Filter.eventually_swap_iff
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc, (· ∘ ·),
Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
#align filter.prod_assoc Filter.prod_assoc
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
#align filter.prod_assoc_symm Filter.prod_assoc_symm
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
#align filter.tendsto_prod_assoc Filter.tendsto_prodAssoc
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
#align filter.tendsto_prod_assoc_symm Filter.tendsto_prodAssoc_symm
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
#align filter.map_swap4_prod Filter.map_swap4_prod
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
#align filter.tendsto_swap4_prod Filter.tendsto_swap4_prod
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prod_mk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
#align filter.prod_map_map_eq Filter.prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
#align filter.prod_map_map_eq' Filter.prod_map_map_eq'
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
#align filter.le_prod_map_fst_snd Filter.le_prod_map_fst_snd
theorem Tendsto.prod_map {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
erw [Tendsto, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
#align filter.tendsto.prod_map Filter.Tendsto.prod_map
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
#align filter.map_prod Filter.map_prod
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
#align filter.prod_eq Filter.prod_eq
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
#align filter.prod_inf_prod Filter.prod_inf_prod
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal,
inf_principal]; rfl
#align filter.prod_principal_principal Filter.prod_principal_principal
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 422 | 423 | theorem pure_prod {a : α} {f : Filter β} : pure a ×ˢ f = map (Prod.mk a) f := by |
rw [prod_eq, map_pure, pure_seq_eq_map]
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.WittPolynomial
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.structure_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open MvPolynomial Set
open Finset (range)
open Finsupp (single)
-- This lemma reduces a bundled morphism to a "mere" function,
-- and consequently the simplifier cannot use a lot of powerful simp-lemmas.
-- We disable this locally, and probably it should be disabled globally in mathlib.
attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂Hom
variable {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} {idx : Type*} [CommRing R]
open scoped Witt
section PPrime
variable (p) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
noncomputable def wittStructureRat (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ :=
bind₁ (fun k => bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)
#align witt_structure_rat wittStructureRat
theorem wittStructureRat_prop (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (wittStructureRat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ :=
calc
bind₁ (wittStructureRat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) =
bind₁ (fun k => bind₁ (fun i => (rename (Prod.mk i)) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ)
(bind₁ (xInTermsOfW p ℚ) (W_ ℚ n)) := by
rw [bind₁_bind₁]; exact eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_rat _ _) rfl rfl
_ = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ := by
rw [bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial p _ n, bind₁_X_right]
#align witt_structure_rat_prop wittStructureRat_prop
theorem wittStructureRat_existsUnique (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) :
∃! φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ,
∀ n : ℕ, bind₁ φ (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ := by
refine ⟨wittStructureRat p Φ, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n; apply wittStructureRat_prop
· intro φ H
funext n
rw [show φ n = bind₁ φ (bind₁ (W_ ℚ) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) by
rw [bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW p, bind₁_X_right]]
rw [bind₁_bind₁]
exact eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_rat _ _) (funext H) rfl
#align witt_structure_rat_exists_unique wittStructureRat_existsUnique
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean | 164 | 175 | theorem wittStructureRat_rec_aux (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
wittStructureRat p Φ n * C ((p : ℚ) ^ n) =
bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℚ) ^ i) * wittStructureRat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by |
have := xInTermsOfW_aux p ℚ n
replace := congr_arg (bind₁ fun k : ℕ => bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) this
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right] at this
rw [wittStructureRat, this]; clear this
conv_lhs => simp only [AlgHom.map_sub, bind₁_X_right]
rw [sub_right_inj]
simp only [AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right, AlgHom.map_pow]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.WittPolynomial
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.structure_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open MvPolynomial Set
open Finset (range)
open Finsupp (single)
-- This lemma reduces a bundled morphism to a "mere" function,
-- and consequently the simplifier cannot use a lot of powerful simp-lemmas.
-- We disable this locally, and probably it should be disabled globally in mathlib.
attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂Hom
variable {p : ℕ} {R : Type*} {idx : Type*} [CommRing R]
open scoped Witt
section PPrime
variable (p) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
noncomputable def wittStructureRat (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ :=
bind₁ (fun k => bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)
#align witt_structure_rat wittStructureRat
theorem wittStructureRat_prop (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (wittStructureRat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ :=
calc
bind₁ (wittStructureRat p Φ) (W_ ℚ n) =
bind₁ (fun k => bind₁ (fun i => (rename (Prod.mk i)) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ)
(bind₁ (xInTermsOfW p ℚ) (W_ ℚ n)) := by
rw [bind₁_bind₁]; exact eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_rat _ _) rfl rfl
_ = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ := by
rw [bind₁_xInTermsOfW_wittPolynomial p _ n, bind₁_X_right]
#align witt_structure_rat_prop wittStructureRat_prop
theorem wittStructureRat_existsUnique (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) :
∃! φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℚ,
∀ n : ℕ, bind₁ φ (W_ ℚ n) = bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ := by
refine ⟨wittStructureRat p Φ, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n; apply wittStructureRat_prop
· intro φ H
funext n
rw [show φ n = bind₁ φ (bind₁ (W_ ℚ) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) by
rw [bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW p, bind₁_X_right]]
rw [bind₁_bind₁]
exact eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_rat _ _) (funext H) rfl
#align witt_structure_rat_exists_unique wittStructureRat_existsUnique
theorem wittStructureRat_rec_aux (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
wittStructureRat p Φ n * C ((p : ℚ) ^ n) =
bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℚ) ^ i) * wittStructureRat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
have := xInTermsOfW_aux p ℚ n
replace := congr_arg (bind₁ fun k : ℕ => bind₁ (fun i => rename (Prod.mk i) (W_ ℚ k)) Φ) this
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right] at this
rw [wittStructureRat, this]; clear this
conv_lhs => simp only [AlgHom.map_sub, bind₁_X_right]
rw [sub_right_inj]
simp only [AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_mul, bind₁_C_right, AlgHom.map_pow]
rfl
#align witt_structure_rat_rec_aux wittStructureRat_rec_aux
theorem wittStructureRat_rec (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℚ) (n : ℕ) :
wittStructureRat p Φ n =
C (1 / (p : ℚ) ^ n) *
(bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (W_ ℚ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℚ) ^ i) * wittStructureRat p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i)) := by
calc
wittStructureRat p Φ n = C (1 / (p : ℚ) ^ n) * (wittStructureRat p Φ n * C ((p : ℚ) ^ n)) := ?_
_ = _ := by rw [wittStructureRat_rec_aux]
rw [mul_left_comm, ← C_mul, div_mul_cancel₀, C_1, mul_one]
exact pow_ne_zero _ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hp.1.ne_zero)
#align witt_structure_rat_rec wittStructureRat_rec
noncomputable def wittStructureInt (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ :=
Finsupp.mapRange Rat.num (Rat.num_intCast 0) (wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) n)
#align witt_structure_int wittStructureInt
variable {p}
theorem bind₁_rename_expand_wittPolynomial (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ)
(IH :
∀ m : ℕ,
m < n + 1 →
map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (wittStructureInt p Φ m) =
wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) m) :
bind₁ (fun b => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (expand p (W_ ℤ n))) Φ =
bind₁ (fun i => expand p (wittStructureInt p Φ i)) (W_ ℤ n) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [map_bind₁, map_rename, map_expand, rename_expand, map_wittPolynomial]
have key := (wittStructureRat_prop p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) n).symm
apply_fun expand p at key
simp only [expand_bind₁] at key
rw [key]; clear key
apply eval₂Hom_congr' rfl _ rfl
rintro i hi -
rw [wittPolynomial_vars, Finset.mem_range] at hi
simp only [IH i hi]
#align bind₁_rename_expand_witt_polynomial bind₁_rename_expand_wittPolynomial
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean | 229 | 267 | theorem C_p_pow_dvd_bind₁_rename_wittPolynomial_sub_sum (Φ : MvPolynomial idx ℤ) (n : ℕ)
(IH :
∀ m : ℕ,
m < n →
map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) (wittStructureInt p Φ m) =
wittStructureRat p (map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Φ) m) :
(C ((p ^ n :) : ℤ) : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ) ∣
bind₁ (fun b : idx => rename (fun i => (b, i)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)) Φ -
∑ i ∈ range n, C ((p : ℤ) ^ i) * wittStructureInt p Φ i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by |
cases' n with n
· simp only [isUnit_one, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add, pow_zero, C_1, IsUnit.dvd,
Nat.cast_one, Nat.zero_eq]
-- prepare a useful equation for rewriting
have key := bind₁_rename_expand_wittPolynomial Φ n IH
apply_fun map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod (p ^ (n + 1)))) at key
conv_lhs at key => simp only [map_bind₁, map_rename, map_expand, map_wittPolynomial]
-- clean up and massage
rw [C_dvd_iff_zmod, RingHom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_bind₁]
simp only [map_rename, map_wittPolynomial, wittPolynomial_zmod_self]
rw [key]; clear key IH
rw [bind₁, aeval_wittPolynomial, map_sum, map_sum, Finset.sum_congr rfl]
intro k hk
rw [Finset.mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hk
-- Porting note (#11083): was much slower
-- simp only [← sub_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_sub, ← C_dvd_iff_zmod, C_eq_coe_nat, ← mul_sub, ←
-- Nat.cast_pow]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_sub, ← C_dvd_iff_zmod, C_eq_coe_nat, ← Nat.cast_pow,
← Nat.cast_pow, C_eq_coe_nat, ← mul_sub]
have : p ^ (n + 1) = p ^ k * p ^ (n - k + 1) := by
rw [← pow_add, ← add_assoc]; congr 2; rw [add_comm, ← tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le hk]
rw [this]
rw [Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_pow, Nat.cast_pow]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left ((p : MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ) ^ k)
rw [show p ^ (n + 1 - k) = p * p ^ (n - k) by rw [← pow_succ', ← tsub_add_eq_add_tsub hk]]
rw [pow_mul]
-- the machine!
apply dvd_sub_pow_of_dvd_sub
rw [← C_eq_coe_nat, C_dvd_iff_zmod, RingHom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, map_expand, RingHom.map_pow,
MvPolynomial.expand_zmod]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Submodule
#align_import algebra.lie.ideal_operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8983bec7cdf6cb2dd1f21315c8a34ab00d7b2f6d"
universe u v w w₁ w₂
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (I J : LieIdeal R L) (N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M₂)
section LieIdealOperations
instance hasBracket : Bracket (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun I N => lieSpan R L { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m }⟩
#align lie_submodule.has_bracket LieSubmodule.hasBracket
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lieSpan R L { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m } :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_span LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_span
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) =
Submodule.span R { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m } := by
apply le_antisymm
· let s := { m : M | ∃ (x : ↥I) (n : ↥N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m }
have aux : ∀ (y : L), ∀ m' ∈ Submodule.span R s, ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s := by
intro y m' hm'
refine Submodule.span_induction (R := R) (M := M) (s := s)
(p := fun m' ↦ ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s) hm' ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩; rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ ?_ ?_ <;> apply Submodule.subset_span
· use ⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n
· use x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩
· simp only [lie_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro m₁ m₂ hm₁ hm₂; rw [lie_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂
· intro t m'' hm''; rw [lie_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ t hm''
change _ ≤ ({ Submodule.span R s with lie_mem := fun hm' => aux _ _ hm' } : LieSubmodule R L M)
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
exact Submodule.subset_span
· rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply submodule_span_le_lieSpan
#align lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span' :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { m | ∃ x ∈ I, ∃ n ∈ N, ⁅x, n⁆ = m } := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
#align lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span' LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'
theorem lie_le_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N' := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩
exact h x hx m hm
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_iff LieSubmodule.lie_le_iff
theorem lie_coe_mem_lie (x : I) (m : N) : ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply subset_lieSpan; use x, m
#align lie_submodule.lie_coe_mem_lie LieSubmodule.lie_coe_mem_lie
theorem lie_mem_lie {x : L} {m : M} (hx : x ∈ I) (hm : m ∈ N) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
N.lie_coe_mem_lie I ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
#align lie_submodule.lie_mem_lie LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie
theorem lie_comm : ⁅I, J⁆ = ⁅J, I⁆ := by
suffices ∀ I J : LieIdeal R L, ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ ⁅J, I⁆ by exact le_antisymm (this I J) (this J I)
clear! I J; intro I J
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro x ⟨y, z, h⟩; rw [← h]
rw [← lie_skew, ← lie_neg, ← LieSubmodule.coe_neg]
apply lie_coe_mem_lie
#align lie_submodule.lie_comm LieSubmodule.lie_comm
theorem lie_le_right : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨x, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
exact N.lie_mem n.property
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_right LieSubmodule.lie_le_right
theorem lie_le_left : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I := by rw [lie_comm]; exact lie_le_right I J
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_left LieSubmodule.lie_le_left
theorem lie_le_inf : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I ⊓ J := by rw [le_inf_iff]; exact ⟨lie_le_left I J, lie_le_right J I⟩
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_inf LieSubmodule.lie_le_inf
@[simp]
theorem lie_bot : ⁅I, (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⁆ = ⊥ := by rw [eq_bot_iff]; apply lie_le_right
#align lie_submodule.lie_bot LieSubmodule.lie_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_lie : ⁅(⊥ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ = ⊥ := by
suffices ⁅(⊥ : LieIdeal R L), N⁆ ≤ ⊥ by exact le_bot_iff.mp this
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
change x ∈ (⊥ : LieIdeal R L) at hx; rw [mem_bot] at hx; simp [hx]
#align lie_submodule.bot_lie LieSubmodule.bot_lie
theorem lie_eq_bot_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅(x : L), m⁆ = 0 := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⁅x, m⁆ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h - ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩⟩
exact h x hx n hn
#align lie_submodule.lie_eq_bot_iff LieSubmodule.lie_eq_bot_iff
theorem mono_lie (h₁ : I ≤ J) (h₂ : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N'⁆ := by
intro m h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, mem_lieSpan] at h; rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, mem_lieSpan]
intro N hN; apply h; rintro m' ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, hm⟩; rw [← hm]; apply hN
use ⟨x, h₁ hx⟩, ⟨n, h₂ hn⟩
#align lie_submodule.mono_lie LieSubmodule.mono_lie
theorem mono_lie_left (h : I ≤ J) : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅J, N⁆ :=
mono_lie _ _ _ _ h (le_refl N)
#align lie_submodule.mono_lie_left LieSubmodule.mono_lie_left
theorem mono_lie_right (h : N ≤ N') : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N'⁆ :=
mono_lie _ _ _ _ (le_refl I) h
#align lie_submodule.mono_lie_right LieSubmodule.mono_lie_right
@[simp]
theorem lie_sup : ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ := by
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ := by
rw [sup_le_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_right <;> [exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right]
suffices ⁅I, N ⊔ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅I, N'⁆ by exact le_antisymm this h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, h⟩; erw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup]
erw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup] at hn; rcases hn with ⟨n₁, hn₁, n₂, hn₂, hn'⟩
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
use ⁅(x : L), (⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ : N')⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
simp [← h, ← hn']
#align lie_submodule.lie_sup LieSubmodule.lie_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_lie : ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ = ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ := by
have h : ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ := by
rw [sup_le_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_left <;> [exact le_sup_left; exact le_sup_right]
suffices ⁅I ⊔ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊔ ⁅J, N⁆ by exact le_antisymm this h
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, n, h⟩; erw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup]
erw [LieSubmodule.mem_sup] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨x₁, hx₁, x₂, hx₂, hx'⟩
use ⁅((⟨x₁, hx₁⟩ : I) : L), (n : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
use ⁅((⟨x₂, hx₂⟩ : J) : L), (n : N)⁆; constructor; · apply lie_coe_mem_lie
simp [← h, ← hx']
#align lie_submodule.sup_lie LieSubmodule.sup_lie
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem lie_inf : ⁅I, N ⊓ N'⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊓ ⁅I, N'⁆ := by
rw [le_inf_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_right <;> [exact inf_le_left; exact inf_le_right]
#align lie_submodule.lie_inf LieSubmodule.lie_inf
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem inf_lie : ⁅I ⊓ J, N⁆ ≤ ⁅I, N⁆ ⊓ ⁅J, N⁆ := by
rw [le_inf_iff]; constructor <;>
apply mono_lie_left <;> [exact inf_le_left; exact inf_le_right]
#align lie_submodule.inf_lie LieSubmodule.inf_lie
variable (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M₂)
theorem map_bracket_eq : map f ⁅I, N⁆ = ⁅I, map f N⁆ := by
rw [← coe_toSubmodule_eq_iff, coeSubmodule_map, lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span,
lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span, Submodule.map_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩, hm⟩⟩
simp only [LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap, LieModuleHom.map_lie] at hm
exact ⟨x, ⟨f n, (mem_map (f n)).mpr ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩⟩, hm⟩
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨m₂, hm₂ : m₂ ∈ map f N⟩, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := (mem_map m₂).mp hm₂
exact ⟨⁅x, n⁆, ⟨x, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩, by simp⟩
#align lie_submodule.map_bracket_eq LieSubmodule.map_bracket_eq
theorem map_comap_le : map f (comap f N₂) ≤ N₂ :=
(N₂ : Set M₂).image_preimage_subset f
#align lie_submodule.map_comap_le LieSubmodule.map_comap_le
theorem map_comap_eq (hf : N₂ ≤ f.range) : map f (comap f N₂) = N₂ := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset hf
#align lie_submodule.map_comap_eq LieSubmodule.map_comap_eq
theorem le_comap_map : N ≤ comap f (map f N) :=
(N : Set M).subset_preimage_image f
#align lie_submodule.le_comap_map LieSubmodule.le_comap_map
theorem comap_map_eq (hf : f.ker = ⊥) : comap f (map f N) = N := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
exact (N : Set M).preimage_image_eq (f.ker_eq_bot.mp hf)
#align lie_submodule.comap_map_eq LieSubmodule.comap_map_eq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/IdealOperations.lean | 235 | 238 | theorem comap_bracket_eq (hf₁ : f.ker = ⊥) (hf₂ : N₂ ≤ f.range) :
comap f ⁅I, N₂⁆ = ⁅I, comap f N₂⁆ := by |
conv_lhs => rw [← map_comap_eq N₂ f hf₂]
rw [← map_bracket_eq, comap_map_eq _ f hf₁]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
#align_import analysis.locally_convex.polar from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
open Topology
namespace LinearMap
section NormedRing
variable [NormedCommRing 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable (B : E →ₗ[𝕜] F →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜)
def polar (s : Set E) : Set F :=
{ y : F | ∀ x ∈ s, ‖B x y‖ ≤ 1 }
#align linear_map.polar LinearMap.polar
theorem polar_mem_iff (s : Set E) (y : F) : y ∈ B.polar s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ‖B x y‖ ≤ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.polar_mem_iff LinearMap.polar_mem_iff
theorem polar_mem (s : Set E) (y : F) (hy : y ∈ B.polar s) : ∀ x ∈ s, ‖B x y‖ ≤ 1 :=
hy
#align linear_map.polar_mem LinearMap.polar_mem
@[simp]
theorem zero_mem_polar (s : Set E) : (0 : F) ∈ B.polar s := fun _ _ => by
simp only [map_zero, norm_zero, zero_le_one]
#align linear_map.zero_mem_polar LinearMap.zero_mem_polar
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/Polar.lean | 73 | 75 | theorem polar_eq_iInter {s : Set E} : B.polar s = ⋂ x ∈ s, { y : F | ‖B x y‖ ≤ 1 } := by |
ext
simp only [polar_mem_iff, Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
#align_import linear_algebra.trace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4cf7ca0e69e048b006674cf4499e5c7d296a89e0"
noncomputable section
universe u v w
namespace LinearMap
open Matrix
open FiniteDimensional
open TensorProduct
section
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
variable {κ : Type*} [DecidableEq κ] [Fintype κ]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (c : Basis κ R M)
def traceAux : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
Matrix.traceLinearMap ι R R ∘ₗ ↑(LinearMap.toMatrix b b)
#align linear_map.trace_aux LinearMap.traceAux
-- Can't be `simp` because it would cause a loop.
theorem traceAux_def (b : Basis ι R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
traceAux R b f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.trace_aux_def LinearMap.traceAux_def
theorem traceAux_eq : traceAux R b = traceAux R c :=
LinearMap.ext fun f =>
calc
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) =
Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b ((LinearMap.id.comp f).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.id_comp, LinearMap.comp_id]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id * LinearMap.toMatrix c c f *
LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f * LinearMap.toMatrix b c LinearMap.id *
LinearMap.toMatrix c b LinearMap.id) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.trace_mul_comm]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c ((f.comp LinearMap.id).comp LinearMap.id)) := by
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ b, LinearMap.toMatrix_comp _ c]
_ = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix c c f) := by rw [LinearMap.comp_id, LinearMap.comp_id]
#align linear_map.trace_aux_eq LinearMap.traceAux_eq
open scoped Classical
variable (M)
def trace : (M →ₗ[R] M) →ₗ[R] R :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then traceAux R H.choose_spec.some else 0
#align linear_map.trace LinearMap.trace
variable {M}
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset {s : Finset M} (b : Basis s R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
have : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) := ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
rw [trace, dif_pos this, ← traceAux_def]
congr 1
apply traceAux_eq
#align linear_map.trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M f = Matrix.trace (LinearMap.toMatrix b b f) := by
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace_of_finset R b.reindexFinsetRange, ← traceAux_def, ← traceAux_def,
traceAux_eq R b b.reindexFinsetRange]
#align linear_map.trace_eq_matrix_trace LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace
theorem trace_mul_comm (f g : M →ₗ[R] M) : trace R M (f * g) = trace R M (g * f) :=
if H : ∃ s : Finset M, Nonempty (Basis s R M) then by
let ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := H
simp_rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, LinearMap.toMatrix_mul]
apply Matrix.trace_mul_comm
else by rw [trace, dif_neg H, LinearMap.zero_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply]
#align linear_map.trace_mul_comm LinearMap.trace_mul_comm
lemma trace_mul_cycle (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * g * h) = trace R M (h * f * g) := by
rw [LinearMap.trace_mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
lemma trace_mul_cycle' (f g h : M →ₗ[R] M) :
trace R M (f * (g * h)) = trace R M (h * (f * g)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, LinearMap.trace_mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem trace_conj (g : M →ₗ[R] M) (f : (M →ₗ[R] M)ˣ) :
trace R M (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = trace R M g := by
rw [trace_mul_comm]
simp
#align linear_map.trace_conj LinearMap.trace_conj
@[simp]
lemma trace_lie {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f g : Module.End R M) :
trace R M ⁅f, g⁆ = 0 := by
rw [Ring.lie_def, map_sub, trace_mul_comm]
exact sub_self _
end
section
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (N P : Type*) [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P]
variable {ι : Type*}
theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis [Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M M = contractLeft R M := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype ι
apply Basis.ext (Basis.tensorProduct (Basis.dualBasis b) b)
rintro ⟨i, j⟩
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Basis.tensorProduct_apply, Basis.coe_dualBasis, coe_comp]
rw [trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, toMatrix_dualTensorHom]
by_cases hij : i = j
· rw [hij]
simp
rw [Matrix.StdBasisMatrix.trace_zero j i (1 : R) hij]
simp [Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij]
#align linear_map.trace_eq_contract_of_basis LinearMap.trace_eq_contract_of_basis
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Trace.lean | 155 | 157 | theorem trace_eq_contract_of_basis' [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R M) :
LinearMap.trace R M = contractLeft R M ∘ₗ (dualTensorHomEquivOfBasis b).symm.toLinearMap := by |
simp [LinearEquiv.eq_comp_toLinearMap_symm, trace_eq_contract_of_basis b]
|
import Batteries.Data.HashMap.Basic
import Batteries.Data.Array.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.Nat.Lemmas
namespace Batteries.HashMap
namespace Imp
attribute [-simp] Bool.not_eq_true
namespace Buckets
@[ext] protected theorem ext : ∀ {b₁ b₂ : Buckets α β}, b₁.1.data = b₂.1.data → b₁ = b₂
| ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
theorem update_data (self : Buckets α β) (i d h) :
(self.update i d h).1.data = self.1.data.set i.toNat d := rfl
theorem exists_of_update (self : Buckets α β) (i d h) :
∃ l₁ l₂, self.1.data = l₁ ++ self.1[i] :: l₂ ∧ List.length l₁ = i.toNat ∧
(self.update i d h).1.data = l₁ ++ d :: l₂ := by
simp only [Array.data_length, Array.ugetElem_eq_getElem, Array.getElem_eq_data_get]
exact List.exists_of_set' h
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/HashMap/WF.lean | 29 | 33 | theorem update_update (self : Buckets α β) (i d d' h h') :
(self.update i d h).update i d' h' = self.update i d' h := by |
simp only [update, Array.uset, Array.data_length]
congr 1
rw [Array.set_set]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Equiv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Monotone
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import analysis.bounded_variation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology UniformConvergence
open Set MeasureTheory Filter
-- Porting note: sectioned variables because a `wlog` was broken due to extra variables in context
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
noncomputable def eVariationOn (f : α → E) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ p : ℕ × { u : ℕ → α // Monotone u ∧ ∀ i, u i ∈ s },
∑ i ∈ Finset.range p.1, edist (f (p.2.1 (i + 1))) (f (p.2.1 i))
#align evariation_on eVariationOn
def BoundedVariationOn (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :=
eVariationOn f s ≠ ∞
#align has_bounded_variation_on BoundedVariationOn
def LocallyBoundedVariationOn (f : α → E) (s : Set α) :=
∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → BoundedVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc a b)
#align has_locally_bounded_variation_on LocallyBoundedVariationOn
namespace eVariationOn
theorem nonempty_monotone_mem {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
Nonempty { u // Monotone u ∧ ∀ i : ℕ, u i ∈ s } := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => x, fun i j _ => le_rfl, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
#align evariation_on.nonempty_monotone_mem eVariationOn.nonempty_monotone_mem
theorem eq_of_edist_zero_on {f f' : α → E} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → edist (f x) (f' x) = 0) :
eVariationOn f s = eVariationOn f' s := by
dsimp only [eVariationOn]
congr 1 with p : 1
congr 1 with i : 1
rw [edist_congr_right (h <| p.snd.prop.2 (i + 1)), edist_congr_left (h <| p.snd.prop.2 i)]
#align evariation_on.eq_of_edist_zero_on eVariationOn.eq_of_edist_zero_on
theorem eq_of_eqOn {f f' : α → E} {s : Set α} (h : EqOn f f' s) :
eVariationOn f s = eVariationOn f' s :=
eq_of_edist_zero_on fun x xs => by rw [h xs, edist_self]
#align evariation_on.eq_of_eq_on eVariationOn.eq_of_eqOn
theorem sum_le (f : α → E) {s : Set α} (n : ℕ) {u : ℕ → α} (hu : Monotone u) (us : ∀ i, u i ∈ s) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f (u (i + 1))) (f (u i))) ≤ eVariationOn f s :=
le_iSup_of_le ⟨n, u, hu, us⟩ le_rfl
#align evariation_on.sum_le eVariationOn.sum_le
theorem sum_le_of_monotoneOn_Icc (f : α → E) {s : Set α} {m n : ℕ} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : MonotoneOn u (Icc m n)) (us : ∀ i ∈ Icc m n, u i ∈ s) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f (u (i + 1))) (f (u i))) ≤ eVariationOn f s := by
rcases le_total n m with hnm | hmn
· simp [Finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le hnm]
let π := projIcc m n hmn
let v i := u (π i)
calc
∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f (u (i + 1))) (f (u i))
= ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f (v (i + 1))) (f (v i)) :=
Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by
rw [Finset.mem_Ico] at hi
simp only [v, π, projIcc_of_mem hmn ⟨hi.1, hi.2.le⟩,
projIcc_of_mem hmn ⟨hi.1.trans i.le_succ, hi.2⟩]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f (v (i + 1))) (f (v i)) :=
Finset.sum_mono_set _ (Nat.Iio_eq_range ▸ Finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self)
_ ≤ eVariationOn f s :=
sum_le _ _ (fun i j h ↦ hu (π i).2 (π j).2 (monotone_projIcc hmn h)) fun i ↦ us _ (π i).2
#align evariation_on.sum_le_of_monotone_on_Icc eVariationOn.sum_le_of_monotoneOn_Icc
theorem sum_le_of_monotoneOn_Iic (f : α → E) {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} {u : ℕ → α}
(hu : MonotoneOn u (Iic n)) (us : ∀ i ≤ n, u i ∈ s) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f (u (i + 1))) (f (u i))) ≤ eVariationOn f s := by
simpa using sum_le_of_monotoneOn_Icc f (m := 0) (hu.mono Icc_subset_Iic_self) fun i hi ↦ us i hi.2
#align evariation_on.sum_le_of_monotone_on_Iic eVariationOn.sum_le_of_monotoneOn_Iic
theorem mono (f : α → E) {s t : Set α} (hst : t ⊆ s) : eVariationOn f t ≤ eVariationOn f s := by
apply iSup_le _
rintro ⟨n, ⟨u, hu, ut⟩⟩
exact sum_le f n hu fun i => hst (ut i)
#align evariation_on.mono eVariationOn.mono
theorem _root_.BoundedVariationOn.mono {f : α → E} {s : Set α} (h : BoundedVariationOn f s)
{t : Set α} (ht : t ⊆ s) : BoundedVariationOn f t :=
ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (eVariationOn.mono f ht)
#align has_bounded_variation_on.mono BoundedVariationOn.mono
theorem _root_.BoundedVariationOn.locallyBoundedVariationOn {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
(h : BoundedVariationOn f s) : LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s := fun _ _ _ _ =>
h.mono inter_subset_left
#align has_bounded_variation_on.has_locally_bounded_variation_on BoundedVariationOn.locallyBoundedVariationOn
theorem edist_le (f : α → E) {s : Set α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ eVariationOn f s := by
wlog hxy : y ≤ x generalizing x y
· rw [edist_comm]
exact this hy hx (le_of_not_le hxy)
let u : ℕ → α := fun n => if n = 0 then y else x
have hu : Monotone u := monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun
| 0 => hxy
| (_ + 1) => le_rfl
have us : ∀ i, u i ∈ s := fun
| 0 => hy
| (_ + 1) => hx
simpa only [Finset.sum_range_one] using sum_le f 1 hu us
#align evariation_on.edist_le eVariationOn.edist_le
theorem eq_zero_iff (f : α → E) {s : Set α} :
eVariationOn f s = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, edist (f x) (f y) = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h x xs y ys
rw [← le_zero_iff, ← h]
exact edist_le f xs ys
· rintro h
dsimp only [eVariationOn]
rw [ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
rintro ⟨n, u, um, us⟩
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i _ => h _ (us i.succ) _ (us i)
#align evariation_on.eq_zero_iff eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoundedVariation.lean | 177 | 181 | theorem constant_on {f : α → E} {s : Set α} (hf : (f '' s).Subsingleton) :
eVariationOn f s = 0 := by |
rw [eq_zero_iff]
rintro x xs y ys
rw [hf ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩ ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, edist_self]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import topology.metric_space.pi_nat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"49b7f94aab3a3bdca1f9f34c5d818afb253b3993"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right one_lt_two inv_le_inv zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
#align pi_nat.first_diff PiNat.firstDiff
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
#align pi_nat.apply_first_diff_ne PiNat.apply_firstDiff_ne
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_lt_first_diff PiNat.apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
#align pi_nat.first_diff_comm PiNat.firstDiff_comm
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 92 | 99 | theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by |
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.Data.List.Prime
#align_import data.polynomial.splits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {F : Type u} {K : Type v} {L : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
section Splits
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable (i : K →+* L)
def Splits (f : K[X]) : Prop :=
f.map i = 0 ∨ ∀ {g : L[X]}, Irreducible g → g ∣ f.map i → degree g = 1
#align polynomial.splits Polynomial.Splits
@[simp]
theorem splits_zero : Splits i (0 : K[X]) :=
Or.inl (Polynomial.map_zero i)
#align polynomial.splits_zero Polynomial.splits_zero
theorem splits_of_map_eq_C {f : K[X]} {a : L} (h : f.map i = C a) : Splits i f :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if ha : a = 0 then Or.inl (h.trans (ha.symm ▸ C_0))
else
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ =>
absurd hg.1 <|
Classical.not_not.2 <|
isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 <| by
have := congr_arg degree hp
rw [h, degree_C ha, degree_mul, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 0,
Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff] at this
exact this.1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_of_map_eq_C Polynomial.splits_of_map_eq_C
@[simp]
theorem splits_C (a : K) : Splits i (C a) :=
splits_of_map_eq_C i (map_C i)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_C Polynomial.splits_C
theorem splits_of_map_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree (f.map i) = 1) : Splits i f :=
Or.inr fun hg ⟨p, hp⟩ => by
have := congr_arg degree hp
simp [Nat.WithBot.add_eq_one_iff, hf, @eq_comm (WithBot ℕ) 1,
mt isUnit_iff_degree_eq_zero.2 hg.1] at this
tauto
#align polynomial.splits_of_map_degree_eq_one Polynomial.splits_of_map_degree_eq_one
theorem splits_of_degree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
if hif : degree (f.map i) ≤ 0 then splits_of_map_eq_C i (degree_le_zero_iff.mp hif)
else by
push_neg at hif
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, ← WithBot.coe_zero, WithBot.succ_coe, Nat.succ_eq_succ] at hif
exact splits_of_map_degree_eq_one i (le_antisymm ((degree_map_le i _).trans hf) hif)
#align polynomial.splits_of_degree_le_one Polynomial.splits_of_degree_le_one
theorem splits_of_degree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : degree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i hf.le
#align polynomial.splits_of_degree_eq_one Polynomial.splits_of_degree_eq_one
theorem splits_of_natDegree_le_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f ≤ 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_degree_le_one i (degree_le_of_natDegree_le hf)
#align polynomial.splits_of_nat_degree_le_one Polynomial.splits_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem splits_of_natDegree_eq_one {f : K[X]} (hf : natDegree f = 1) : Splits i f :=
splits_of_natDegree_le_one i (le_of_eq hf)
#align polynomial.splits_of_nat_degree_eq_one Polynomial.splits_of_natDegree_eq_one
theorem splits_mul {f g : K[X]} (hf : Splits i f) (hg : Splits i g) : Splits i (f * g) :=
letI := Classical.decEq L
if h : (f * g).map i = 0 then Or.inl h
else
Or.inr @fun p hp hpf =>
((irreducible_iff_prime.1 hp).2.2 _ _
(show p ∣ map i f * map i g by convert hpf; rw [Polynomial.map_mul])).elim
(hf.resolve_left (fun hf => by simp [hf] at h) hp)
(hg.resolve_left (fun hg => by simp [hg] at h) hp)
#align polynomial.splits_mul Polynomial.splits_mul
theorem splits_of_splits_mul' {f g : K[X]} (hfg : (f * g).map i ≠ 0) (h : Splits i (f * g)) :
Splits i f ∧ Splits i g :=
⟨Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_right _ _)),
Or.inr @fun g hgi hg =>
Or.resolve_left h hfg hgi (by rw [Polynomial.map_mul]; exact hg.trans (dvd_mul_left _ _))⟩
#align polynomial.splits_of_splits_mul' Polynomial.splits_of_splits_mul'
theorem splits_map_iff (j : L →+* F) {f : K[X]} : Splits j (f.map i) ↔ Splits (j.comp i) f := by
simp [Splits, Polynomial.map_map]
#align polynomial.splits_map_iff Polynomial.splits_map_iff
theorem splits_one : Splits i 1 :=
splits_C i 1
#align polynomial.splits_one Polynomial.splits_one
theorem splits_of_isUnit [IsDomain K] {u : K[X]} (hu : IsUnit u) : u.Splits i :=
(isUnit_iff.mp hu).choose_spec.2 ▸ splits_C _ _
#align polynomial.splits_of_is_unit Polynomial.splits_of_isUnit
theorem splits_X_sub_C {x : K} : (X - C x).Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ <| degree_X_sub_C_le _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_X_sub_C Polynomial.splits_X_sub_C
theorem splits_X : X.Splits i :=
splits_of_degree_le_one _ degree_X_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.splits_X Polynomial.splits_X
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Splits.lean | 146 | 151 | theorem splits_prod {ι : Type u} {s : ι → K[X]} {t : Finset ι} :
(∀ j ∈ t, (s j).Splits i) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x).Splits i := by |
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ => splits_one i) fun a t hat ih ht => ?_
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at ht; rw [Finset.prod_insert hat]
exact splits_mul i ht.1 (ih ht.2)
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.grading from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"34020e531ebc4e8aac6d449d9eecbcd1508ea8d0"
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
open scoped DirectSum
variable (Q)
def evenOdd (i : ZMod 2) : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
⨆ j : { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (j : ℕ)
#align clifford_algebra.even_odd CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd
theorem one_le_evenOdd_zero : 1 ≤ evenOdd Q 0 := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ ⟨0, Nat.cast_zero⟩)
exact (pow_zero _).ge
#align clifford_algebra.one_le_even_odd_zero CliffordAlgebra.one_le_evenOdd_zero
theorem range_ι_le_evenOdd_one : LinearMap.range (ι Q) ≤ evenOdd Q 1 := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ ⟨1, Nat.cast_one⟩)
exact (pow_one _).ge
#align clifford_algebra.range_ι_le_even_odd_one CliffordAlgebra.range_ι_le_evenOdd_one
theorem ι_mem_evenOdd_one (m : M) : ι Q m ∈ evenOdd Q 1 :=
range_ι_le_evenOdd_one Q <| LinearMap.mem_range_self _ m
#align clifford_algebra.ι_mem_even_odd_one CliffordAlgebra.ι_mem_evenOdd_one
theorem ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero (m₁ m₂ : M) : ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ ∈ evenOdd Q 0 :=
Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem ⟨2, rfl⟩
(by
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, pow_two]
exact
Submodule.mul_mem_mul (LinearMap.mem_range_self (ι Q) m₁)
(LinearMap.mem_range_self (ι Q) m₂))
#align clifford_algebra.ι_mul_ι_mem_even_odd_zero CliffordAlgebra.ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero
theorem evenOdd_mul_le (i j : ZMod 2) : evenOdd Q i * evenOdd Q j ≤ evenOdd Q (i + j) := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.iSup_eq_span, Submodule.span_mul_span]
apply Submodule.span_mono
simp_rw [Set.iUnion_mul, Set.mul_iUnion, Set.iUnion_subset_iff, Set.mul_subset_iff]
rintro ⟨xi, rfl⟩ ⟨yi, rfl⟩ x hx y hy
refine Set.mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨⟨xi + yi, Nat.cast_add _ _⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Nat.cast_add, pow_add]
exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align clifford_algebra.even_odd_mul_le CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd_mul_le
instance evenOdd.gradedMonoid : SetLike.GradedMonoid (evenOdd Q) where
one_mem := Submodule.one_le.mp (one_le_evenOdd_zero Q)
mul_mem _i _j _p _q hp hq := Submodule.mul_le.mp (evenOdd_mul_le Q _ _) _ hp _ hq
#align clifford_algebra.even_odd.graded_monoid CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd.gradedMonoid
-- Porting note: added `protected`
protected def GradedAlgebra.ι : M →ₗ[R] ⨁ i : ZMod 2, evenOdd Q i :=
DirectSum.lof R (ZMod 2) (fun i => ↥(evenOdd Q i)) 1 ∘ₗ (ι Q).codRestrict _ (ι_mem_evenOdd_one Q)
#align clifford_algebra.graded_algebra.ι CliffordAlgebra.GradedAlgebra.ι
theorem GradedAlgebra.ι_apply (m : M) :
GradedAlgebra.ι Q m = DirectSum.of (fun i => ↥(evenOdd Q i)) 1 ⟨ι Q m, ι_mem_evenOdd_one Q m⟩ :=
rfl
#align clifford_algebra.graded_algebra.ι_apply CliffordAlgebra.GradedAlgebra.ι_apply
nonrec theorem GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar (m : M) :
GradedAlgebra.ι Q m * GradedAlgebra.ι Q m = algebraMap R _ (Q m) := by
rw [GradedAlgebra.ι_apply Q, DirectSum.of_mul_of, DirectSum.algebraMap_apply]
exact DirectSum.of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq (Sigma.subtype_ext rfl <| ι_sq_scalar _ _)
#align clifford_algebra.graded_algebra.ι_sq_scalar CliffordAlgebra.GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar
theorem GradedAlgebra.lift_ι_eq (i' : ZMod 2) (x' : evenOdd Q i') :
-- Porting note: added a second `by apply`
lift Q ⟨by apply GradedAlgebra.ι Q, by apply GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar Q⟩ x' =
DirectSum.of (fun i => evenOdd Q i) i' x' := by
cases' x' with x' hx'
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, DirectSum.lof_eq_of]
induction hx' using Submodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem i x hx =>
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := i
-- Porting note: `dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at hx` doesn't work, use `change` instead
change x ∈ LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ i at hx
induction hx using Submodule.pow_induction_on_left' with
| algebraMap r =>
rw [AlgHom.commutes, DirectSum.algebraMap_apply]; rfl
| add x y i hx hy ihx ihy =>
-- Note: in #8386 `map_add` had to be specialized to avoid a timeout
-- (the definition was already very slow)
rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihx, ihy, ← AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rfl
| mem_mul m hm i x hx ih =>
obtain ⟨_, rfl⟩ := hm
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, ih, lift_ι_apply, GradedAlgebra.ι_apply Q, DirectSum.of_mul_of]
refine DirectSum.of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq (Sigma.subtype_ext ?_ ?_) <;>
dsimp only [GradedMonoid.mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
· rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
rfl
| zero =>
rw [AlgHom.map_zero]
apply Eq.symm
apply DFinsupp.single_eq_zero.mpr; rfl
| add x y hx hy ihx ihy =>
rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihx, ihy, ← AddMonoidHom.map_add]; rfl
#align clifford_algebra.graded_algebra.lift_ι_eq CliffordAlgebra.GradedAlgebra.lift_ι_eq
instance gradedAlgebra : GradedAlgebra (evenOdd Q) :=
GradedAlgebra.ofAlgHom (evenOdd Q)
-- while not necessary, the `by apply` makes this elaborate faster
(lift Q ⟨by apply GradedAlgebra.ι Q, by apply GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar Q⟩)
-- the proof from here onward is mostly similar to the `TensorAlgebra` case, with some extra
-- handling for the `iSup` in `evenOdd`.
(by
ext m
dsimp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, AlgHom.comp_apply,
AlgHom.id_apply]
rw [lift_ι_apply, GradedAlgebra.ι_apply Q, DirectSum.coeAlgHom_of, Subtype.coe_mk])
(by apply GradedAlgebra.lift_ι_eq Q)
#align clifford_algebra.graded_algebra CliffordAlgebra.gradedAlgebra
theorem iSup_ι_range_eq_top : ⨆ i : ℕ, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ i = ⊤ := by
rw [← (DirectSum.Decomposition.isInternal (evenOdd Q)).submodule_iSup_eq_top, eq_comm]
calc
-- Porting note: needs extra annotations, no longer unifies against the goal in the face of
-- ambiguity
⨆ (i : ZMod 2) (j : { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }), LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (j : ℕ) =
⨆ i : Σ i : ZMod 2, { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (i.2 : ℕ) := by
rw [iSup_sigma]
_ = ⨆ i : ℕ, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ i :=
Function.Surjective.iSup_congr (fun i => i.2) (fun i => ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩) fun _ => rfl
#align clifford_algebra.supr_ι_range_eq_top CliffordAlgebra.iSup_ι_range_eq_top
theorem evenOdd_isCompl : IsCompl (evenOdd Q 0) (evenOdd Q 1) :=
(DirectSum.Decomposition.isInternal (evenOdd Q)).isCompl zero_ne_one <| by
have : (Finset.univ : Finset (ZMod 2)) = {0, 1} := rfl
simpa using congr_arg ((↑) : Finset (ZMod 2) → Set (ZMod 2)) this
#align clifford_algebra.even_odd_is_compl CliffordAlgebra.evenOdd_isCompl
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Grading.lean | 162 | 201 | theorem evenOdd_induction (n : ZMod 2) {motive : ∀ x, x ∈ evenOdd Q n → Prop}
(range_ι_pow : ∀ (v) (h : v ∈ LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ n.val),
motive v (Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem ⟨n.val, n.natCast_zmod_val⟩ h))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, motive x hx → motive y hy → motive (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy))
(ι_mul_ι_mul :
∀ m₁ m₂ x hx,
motive x hx →
motive (ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ * x)
(zero_add n ▸ SetLike.mul_mem_graded (ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero Q m₁ m₂) hx))
(x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (hx : x ∈ evenOdd Q n) : motive x hx := by |
apply Submodule.iSup_induction' (C := motive) _ (range_ι_pow 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _)) add
refine Subtype.rec ?_
simp_rw [ZMod.natCast_eq_iff, add_comm n.val]
rintro n' ⟨k, rfl⟩ xv
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_mul]
intro hxv
induction hxv using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem a ha b hb =>
induction ha using Submodule.pow_induction_on_left' with
| algebraMap r =>
simp_rw [← Algebra.smul_def]
exact range_ι_pow _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hb)
| add x y n hx hy ihx ihy =>
simp_rw [add_mul]
apply add _ _ _ _ ihx ihy
| mem_mul x hx n'' y hy ihy =>
revert hx
simp_rw [pow_two]
intro hx2
induction hx2 using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
simp_rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at hm hn
obtain ⟨m₁, rfl⟩ := hm; obtain ⟨m₂, rfl⟩ := hn
simp_rw [mul_assoc _ y b]
exact ι_mul_ι_mul _ _ _ _ ihy
| add x hx y hy ihx ihy =>
simp_rw [add_mul]
apply add _ _ _ _ ihx ihy
| add x y hx hy ihx ihy =>
apply add _ _ _ _ ihx ihy
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.PID
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
#align_import group_theory.finite_abelian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"879155bff5af618b9062cbb2915347dafd749ad6"
open scoped DirectSum
private def directSumNeZeroMulHom {ι : Type} [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → ℕ) (n : ι → ℕ) :
(⨁ i : {i // n i ≠ 0}, ZMod (p i ^ n i)) →+ ⨁ i, ZMod (p i ^ n i) :=
DirectSum.toAddMonoid fun i ↦ DirectSum.of (fun i ↦ ZMod (p i ^ n i)) i
private def directSumNeZeroMulEquiv (ι : Type) [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → ℕ) (n : ι → ℕ) :
(⨁ i : {i // n i ≠ 0}, ZMod (p i ^ n i)) ≃+ ⨁ i, ZMod (p i ^ n i) where
toFun := directSumNeZeroMulHom p n
invFun := DirectSum.toAddMonoid fun i ↦
if h : n i = 0 then 0 else DirectSum.of (fun j : {i // n i ≠ 0} ↦ ZMod (p j ^ n j)) ⟨i, h⟩
left_inv x := by
induction' x using DirectSum.induction_on with i x x y hx hy
· simp
· rw [directSumNeZeroMulHom, DirectSum.toAddMonoid_of, DirectSum.toAddMonoid_of,
dif_neg i.prop]
· rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
right_inv x := by
induction' x using DirectSum.induction_on with i x x y hx hy
· rw [map_zero, map_zero]
· rw [DirectSum.toAddMonoid_of]
split_ifs with h
· simp [(ZMod.subsingleton_iff.2 $ by rw [h, pow_zero]).elim x 0]
· simp_rw [directSumNeZeroMulHom, DirectSum.toAddMonoid_of]
· rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
map_add' := map_add (directSumNeZeroMulHom p n)
universe u
variable (G : Type u)
namespace AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
theorem equiv_free_prod_directSum_zmod [hG : AddGroup.FG G] :
∃ (n : ℕ) (ι : Type) (_ : Fintype ι) (p : ι → ℕ) (_ : ∀ i, Nat.Prime <| p i) (e : ι → ℕ),
Nonempty <| G ≃+ (Fin n →₀ ℤ) × ⨁ i : ι, ZMod (p i ^ e i) := by
obtain ⟨n, ι, fι, p, hp, e, ⟨f⟩⟩ :=
@Module.equiv_free_prod_directSum _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Module.Finite.iff_addGroup_fg.mpr hG)
refine ⟨n, ι, fι, fun i => (p i).natAbs, fun i => ?_, e, ⟨?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime, ← irreducible_iff_prime]; exact hp i
exact
f.toAddEquiv.trans
((AddEquiv.refl _).prodCongr <|
DFinsupp.mapRange.addEquiv fun i =>
((Int.quotientSpanEquivZMod _).trans <|
ZMod.ringEquivCongr <| (p i).natAbs_pow _).toAddEquiv)
#align add_comm_group.equiv_free_prod_direct_sum_zmod AddCommGroup.equiv_free_prod_directSum_zmod
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FiniteAbelian.lean | 131 | 143 | theorem equiv_directSum_zmod_of_finite [Finite G] :
∃ (ι : Type) (_ : Fintype ι) (p : ι → ℕ) (_ : ∀ i, Nat.Prime <| p i) (e : ι → ℕ),
Nonempty <| G ≃+ ⨁ i : ι, ZMod (p i ^ e i) := by |
cases nonempty_fintype G
obtain ⟨n, ι, fι, p, hp, e, ⟨f⟩⟩ := equiv_free_prod_directSum_zmod G
cases' n with n
· have : Unique (Fin Nat.zero →₀ ℤ) :=
{ uniq := by simp only [Nat.zero_eq, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]; trivial }
exact ⟨ι, fι, p, hp, e, ⟨f.trans AddEquiv.uniqueProd⟩⟩
· haveI := @Fintype.prodLeft _ _ _ (Fintype.ofEquiv G f.toEquiv) _
exact
(Fintype.ofSurjective (fun f : Fin n.succ →₀ ℤ => f 0) fun a =>
⟨Finsupp.single 0 a, Finsupp.single_eq_same⟩).false.elim
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import order.height from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf27744463e9620ca4e4ebe951fe83530ae6949b"
open List hiding le_antisymm
open OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section LT
variable [LT α] [LT β] (s t : Set α)
def subchain : Set (List α) :=
{ l | l.Chain' (· < ·) ∧ ∀ i ∈ l, i ∈ s }
#align set.subchain Set.subchain
@[simp] -- porting note: new `simp`
theorem nil_mem_subchain : [] ∈ s.subchain := ⟨trivial, fun _ ↦ nofun⟩
#align set.nil_mem_subchain Set.nil_mem_subchain
variable {s} {l : List α} {a : α}
theorem cons_mem_subchain_iff :
(a::l) ∈ s.subchain ↔ a ∈ s ∧ l ∈ s.subchain ∧ ∀ b ∈ l.head?, a < b := by
simp only [subchain, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_cons, chain'_cons', and_left_comm, and_comm,
and_assoc]
#align set.cons_mem_subchain_iff Set.cons_mem_subchain_iff
@[simp] -- Porting note (#10756): new lemma + `simp`
theorem singleton_mem_subchain_iff : [a] ∈ s.subchain ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [cons_mem_subchain_iff]
instance : Nonempty s.subchain :=
⟨⟨[], s.nil_mem_subchain⟩⟩
variable (s)
noncomputable def chainHeight : ℕ∞ :=
⨆ l ∈ s.subchain, length l
#align set.chain_height Set.chainHeight
theorem chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype : s.chainHeight = ⨆ l : s.subchain, ↑l.1.length :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.chain_height_eq_supr_subtype Set.chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype
theorem exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight {n : ℕ} (hn : ↑n ≤ s.chainHeight) :
∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n := by
rcases (le_top : s.chainHeight ≤ ⊤).eq_or_lt with ha | ha <;>
rw [chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype] at ha
· obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩, h₃⟩ :=
not_bddAbove_iff'.mp (WithTop.iSup_coe_eq_top.1 ha) n
exact ⟨l.take n, ⟨h₁.take _, fun x h ↦ h₂ _ <| take_subset _ _ h⟩,
(l.length_take n).trans <| min_eq_left <| le_of_not_ge h₃⟩
· rw [ENat.iSup_coe_lt_top] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩, e : l.length = _⟩ := Nat.sSup_mem (Set.range_nonempty _) ha
refine
⟨l.take n, ⟨h₁.take _, fun x h ↦ h₂ _ <| take_subset _ _ h⟩,
(l.length_take n).trans <| min_eq_left <| ?_⟩
rwa [e, ← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), sSup_range, ENat.coe_iSup ha, ← chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype]
#align set.exists_chain_of_le_chain_height Set.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight
theorem le_chainHeight_TFAE (n : ℕ) :
TFAE [↑n ≤ s.chainHeight, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, n ≤ length l] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2; · exact s.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight
tfae_have 2 → 3; · rintro ⟨l, hls, he⟩; exact ⟨l, hls, he.ge⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1; · rintro ⟨l, hs, hn⟩; exact le_iSup₂_of_le l hs (WithTop.coe_le_coe.2 hn)
tfae_finish
#align set.le_chain_height_tfae Set.le_chainHeight_TFAE
variable {s t}
theorem le_chainHeight_iff {n : ℕ} : ↑n ≤ s.chainHeight ↔ ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n :=
(le_chainHeight_TFAE s n).out 0 1
#align set.le_chain_height_iff Set.le_chainHeight_iff
theorem length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain (hl : l ∈ s.subchain) : ↑l.length ≤ s.chainHeight :=
le_chainHeight_iff.mpr ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
#align set.length_le_chain_height_of_mem_subchain Set.length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain
theorem chainHeight_eq_top_iff : s.chainHeight = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n := by
refine ⟨fun h n ↦ le_chainHeight_iff.1 (le_top.trans_eq h.symm), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! h; obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := WithTop.ne_top_iff_exists.1 h
exact ⟨n + 1, fun l hs ↦ (Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 <| Nat.cast_le.1 <|
(length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain hs).trans_eq hn.symm).ne⟩
#align set.chain_height_eq_top_iff Set.chainHeight_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_chainHeight_iff : 1 ≤ s.chainHeight ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, Set.le_chainHeight_iff]
simp only [length_eq_one, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), @eq_comm _ _ [_], exists_exists_eq_and,
singleton_mem_subchain_iff, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.one_le_chain_height_iff Set.one_le_chainHeight_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Height.lean | 142 | 144 | theorem chainHeight_eq_zero_iff : s.chainHeight = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by |
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, one_le_chainHeight_iff,
nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 194 | 195 | theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by |
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Projection
import Mathlib.Order.JordanHolder
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Intervals
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
#align_import ring_theory.simple_module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cce7f68a7eaadadf74c82bbac20721cdc03a1cc1"
variable {ι : Type*} (R S : Type*) [Ring R] [Ring S] (M : Type*) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
abbrev IsSimpleModule :=
IsSimpleOrder (Submodule R M)
#align is_simple_module IsSimpleModule
abbrev IsSemisimpleModule :=
ComplementedLattice (Submodule R M)
#align is_semisimple_module IsSemisimpleModule
abbrev IsSemisimpleRing := IsSemisimpleModule R R
theorem RingEquiv.isSemisimpleRing (e : R ≃+* S) [IsSemisimpleRing R] : IsSemisimpleRing S :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap e.toSemilinearEquiv).complementedLattice
-- Making this an instance causes the linter to complain of "dangerous instances"
theorem IsSimpleModule.nontrivial [IsSimpleModule R M] : Nontrivial M :=
⟨⟨0, by
have h : (⊥ : Submodule R M) ≠ ⊤ := bot_ne_top
contrapose! h
ext x
simp [Submodule.mem_bot, Submodule.mem_top, h x]⟩⟩
#align is_simple_module.nontrivial IsSimpleModule.nontrivial
variable {m : Submodule R M} {N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] {R S M}
theorem LinearMap.isSimpleModule_iff_of_bijective [Module S N] {σ : R →+* S} [RingHomSurjective σ]
(l : M →ₛₗ[σ] N) (hl : Function.Bijective l) : IsSimpleModule R M ↔ IsSimpleModule S N :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComapOfBijective l hl).isSimpleOrder_iff
theorem IsSimpleModule.congr (l : M ≃ₗ[R] N) [IsSimpleModule R N] : IsSimpleModule R M :=
(Submodule.orderIsoMapComap l).isSimpleOrder
#align is_simple_module.congr IsSimpleModule.congr
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom : IsSimpleModule R m ↔ IsAtom m := by
rw [← Set.isSimpleOrder_Iic_iff_isAtom]
exact m.mapIic.isSimpleOrder_iff
#align is_simple_module_iff_is_atom isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom
theorem isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom : IsSimpleModule R (M ⧸ m) ↔ IsCoatom m := by
rw [← Set.isSimpleOrder_Ici_iff_isCoatom]
apply OrderIso.isSimpleOrder_iff
exact Submodule.comapMkQRelIso m
#align is_simple_module_iff_is_coatom isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom
theorem covBy_iff_quot_is_simple {A B : Submodule R M} (hAB : A ≤ B) :
A ⋖ B ↔ IsSimpleModule R (B ⧸ Submodule.comap B.subtype A) := by
set f : Submodule R B ≃o Set.Iic B := B.mapIic with hf
rw [covBy_iff_coatom_Iic hAB, isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom, ← OrderIso.isCoatom_iff f, hf]
simp [-OrderIso.isCoatom_iff, Submodule.map_comap_subtype, inf_eq_right.2 hAB]
#align covby_iff_quot_is_simple covBy_iff_quot_is_simple
namespace IsSimpleModule
@[simp]
theorem isAtom [IsSimpleModule R m] : IsAtom m :=
isSimpleModule_iff_isAtom.1 ‹_›
#align is_simple_module.is_atom IsSimpleModule.isAtom
variable [IsSimpleModule R M] (R)
open LinearMap
theorem span_singleton_eq_top {m : M} (hm : m ≠ 0) : Submodule.span R {m} = ⊤ :=
(eq_bot_or_eq_top _).resolve_left fun h ↦ hm (h.le <| Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self m)
instance (S : Submodule R M) : S.IsPrincipal where
principal' := by
obtain rfl | rfl := eq_bot_or_eq_top S
· exact ⟨0, Submodule.span_zero.symm⟩
have := IsSimpleModule.nontrivial R M
have ⟨m, hm⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
exact ⟨m, (span_singleton_eq_top R hm).symm⟩
theorem toSpanSingleton_surjective {m : M} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
Function.Surjective (toSpanSingleton R M m) := by
rw [← range_eq_top, ← span_singleton_eq_range, span_singleton_eq_top R hm]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/SimpleModule.lean | 129 | 132 | theorem ker_toSpanSingleton_isMaximal {m : M} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
Ideal.IsMaximal (ker (toSpanSingleton R M m)) := by |
rw [Ideal.isMaximal_def, ← isSimpleModule_iff_isCoatom]
exact congr (quotKerEquivOfSurjective _ <| toSpanSingleton_surjective R hm)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_neg_I Complex.arg_neg_I
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (abs.ne_zero h)]
#align complex.tan_arg Complex.tan_arg
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_nonneg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [abs.nonneg]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
#align complex.arg_eq_zero_iff Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
#align complex.arg_lt_pi_iff Complex.arg_lt_pi_iff
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_neg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
#align complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
if_pos hx
#align complex.arg_of_re_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
#align complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero Complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align complex.arg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
#align complex.arg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, abs_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
#align complex.arg_conj Complex.arg_conj
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
#align complex.arg_inv Complex.arg_inv
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma abs_eq_one_iff' : abs x = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [abs_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using abs_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
_root_.abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
#align complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 389 | 401 | theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by |
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
#align real.log Real.log
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
#align real.log_of_ne_zero Real.log_of_ne_zero
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.log_of_pos Real.log_of_pos
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align real.exp_log_eq_abs Real.exp_log_eq_abs
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.exp_log Real.exp_log
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.exp_log_of_neg Real.exp_log_of_neg
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
#align real.le_exp_log Real.le_exp_log
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
#align real.log_exp Real.log_exp
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.surj_on_log Real.surjOn_log
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.log_surjective Real.log_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
#align real.range_log Real.range_log
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align real.log_zero Real.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
#align real.log_one Real.log_one
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
#align real.log_abs Real.log_abs
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.log_neg_eq_log Real.log_neg_eq_log
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.sinh_log Real.sinh_log
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.cosh_log Real.cosh_log
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
#align real.surj_on_log' Real.surjOn_log'
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
#align real.log_mul Real.log_mul
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
#align real.log_div Real.log_div
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
#align real.log_inv Real.log_inv
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
#align real.log_le_log Real.log_le_log_iff
@[gcongr]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
#align real.log_lt_log Real.log_lt_log
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
#align real.log_lt_log_iff Real.log_lt_log_iff
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_iff_le_exp Real.log_le_iff_le_exp
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.le_log_iff_exp_le Real.le_log_iff_exp_le
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt
theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
#align real.log_pos_iff Real.log_pos_iff
theorem log_pos (hx : 1 < x) : 0 < log x :=
(log_pos_iff (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)).2 hx
#align real.log_pos Real.log_pos
theorem log_pos_of_lt_neg_one (hx : x < -1) : 0 < log x := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have : 1 < -x := by linarith
exact log_pos this
theorem log_neg_iff (h : 0 < x) : log x < 0 ↔ x < 1 := by
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff h zero_lt_one
#align real.log_neg_iff Real.log_neg_iff
theorem log_neg (h0 : 0 < x) (h1 : x < 1) : log x < 0 :=
(log_neg_iff h0).2 h1
#align real.log_neg Real.log_neg
theorem log_neg_of_lt_zero (h0 : x < 0) (h1 : -1 < x) : log x < 0 := by
rw [← neg_neg x, log_neg_eq_log]
have h0' : 0 < -x := by linarith
have h1' : -x < 1 := by linarith
exact log_neg h0' h1'
theorem log_nonneg_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 ≤ log x ↔ 1 ≤ x := by rw [← not_lt, log_neg_iff hx, not_lt]
#align real.log_nonneg_iff Real.log_nonneg_iff
theorem log_nonneg (hx : 1 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ log x :=
(log_nonneg_iff (zero_lt_one.trans_le hx)).2 hx
#align real.log_nonneg Real.log_nonneg
theorem log_nonpos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by rw [← not_lt, log_pos_iff hx, not_lt]
#align real.log_nonpos_iff Real.log_nonpos_iff
theorem log_nonpos_iff' (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 1 := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hx)
· simp [le_refl, zero_le_one]
exact log_nonpos_iff hx
#align real.log_nonpos_iff' Real.log_nonpos_iff'
theorem log_nonpos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h'x : x ≤ 1) : log x ≤ 0 :=
(log_nonpos_iff' hx).2 h'x
#align real.log_nonpos Real.log_nonpos
theorem log_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
if hn : n = 0 then
simp [hn]
else
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast Nat.one_le_of_lt <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
exact log_nonneg this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_nat_cast_nonneg := log_natCast_nonneg
theorem log_neg_natCast_nonneg (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ log (-n) := by
rw [← log_neg_eq_log, neg_neg]
exact log_natCast_nonneg _
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_neg_nat_cast_nonneg := log_neg_natCast_nonneg
theorem log_intCast_nonneg (n : ℤ) : 0 ≤ log n := by
cases lt_trichotomy 0 n with
| inl hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ n := mod_cast hn
exact log_nonneg this
| inr hn =>
cases hn with
| inl hn => simp [hn.symm]
| inr hn =>
have : (1 : ℝ) ≤ -n := by rw [← neg_zero, ← lt_neg] at hn; exact mod_cast hn
rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
exact log_nonneg this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias log_int_cast_nonneg := log_intCast_nonneg
theorem strictMonoOn_log : StrictMonoOn log (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ _ hxy => log_lt_log hx hxy
#align real.strict_mono_on_log Real.strictMonoOn_log
theorem strictAntiOn_log : StrictAntiOn log (Set.Iio 0) := by
rintro x (hx : x < 0) y (hy : y < 0) hxy
rw [← log_abs y, ← log_abs x]
refine log_lt_log (abs_pos.2 hy.ne) ?_
rwa [abs_of_neg hy, abs_of_neg hx, neg_lt_neg_iff]
#align real.strict_anti_on_log Real.strictAntiOn_log
theorem log_injOn_pos : Set.InjOn log (Set.Ioi 0) :=
strictMonoOn_log.injOn
#align real.log_inj_on_pos Real.log_injOn_pos
theorem log_lt_sub_one_of_pos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≠ 1) : log x < x - 1 := by
have h : log x ≠ 0 := by
rwa [← log_one, log_injOn_pos.ne_iff hx1]
exact mem_Ioi.mpr zero_lt_one
linarith [add_one_lt_exp h, exp_log hx1]
#align real.log_lt_sub_one_of_pos Real.log_lt_sub_one_of_pos
theorem eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 < x) (h₂ : log x = 0) : x = 1 :=
log_injOn_pos (Set.mem_Ioi.2 h₁) (Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one) (h₂.trans Real.log_one.symm)
#align real.eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero Real.eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero
theorem log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one {x : ℝ} (hx_pos : 0 < x) (hx : x ≠ 1) : log x ≠ 0 :=
mt (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero hx_pos) hx
#align real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one Real.log_ne_zero_of_pos_of_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem log_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : log x = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∨ x = 1 ∨ x = -1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (x_lt_zero | rfl | x_gt_zero)
· refine Or.inr (Or.inr (neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp ?_))
rw [← log_neg_eq_log x] at h
exact eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero (neg_pos.mpr x_lt_zero) h
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl (eq_one_of_pos_of_log_eq_zero x_gt_zero h))
· rintro (rfl | rfl | rfl) <;> simp only [log_one, log_zero, log_neg_eq_log]
#align real.log_eq_zero Real.log_eq_zero
theorem log_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : log x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ x ≠ -1 := by
simpa only [not_or] using log_eq_zero.not
#align real.log_ne_zero Real.log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [pow_succ, log_mul (pow_ne_zero _ hx) hx, ih, Nat.cast_succ, add_mul, one_mul]
#align real.log_pow Real.log_pow
@[simp]
theorem log_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : log (x ^ n) = n * log x := by
induction n
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast, log_pow, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [zpow_negSucc, log_inv, log_pow, Int.cast_negSucc, Nat.cast_add_one, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
#align real.log_zpow Real.log_zpow
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 315 | 317 | theorem log_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : log (√x) = log x / 2 := by |
rw [eq_div_iff, mul_comm, ← Nat.cast_two, ← log_pow, sq_sqrt hx]
exact two_ne_zero
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 806 | 811 | theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by |
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
#align orientation.det_rotation Orientation.det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
#align orientation.linear_equiv_det_rotation Orientation.linearEquiv_det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align orientation.rotation_symm Orientation.rotation_symm
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_zero Orientation.rotation_zero
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi Orientation.rotation_pi
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
#align orientation.rotation_pi_apply Orientation.rotation_pi_apply
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.rotation_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, ← mul_smul, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, add_smul,
sub_smul, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, smul_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, smul_neg]
ring_nf
abel
#align orientation.rotation_rotation Orientation.rotation_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) :
(o.rotation θ₁).trans (o.rotation θ₂) = o.rotation (θ₂ + θ₁) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => by rw [← rotation_rotation, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_trans Orientation.rotation_trans
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_left (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = conj (θ.expMapCircle : ℂ) * o.kahler x y := by
-- Porting note: this needed the `Complex.conj_ofReal` instead of `RCLike.conj_ofReal`;
-- I believe this is because the respective coercions are no longer defeq, and
-- `Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle` uses the `Complex` version.
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, map_mul, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, real_smul, kahler_rightAngleRotation_left,
Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle, Complex.conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rotation_left
theorem neg_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) : -o.rotation θ x = o.rotation (π + θ) x := by
rw [← o.rotation_pi_apply, rotation_rotation]
#align orientation.neg_rotation Orientation.neg_rotation
@[simp]
theorem neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two (x : V) :
-o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x := by
rw [neg_rotation, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half]
#align orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two
theorem neg_rotation_pi_div_two (x : V) : -o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x :=
(neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp <| o.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two _).symm
#align orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two
theorem kahler_rotation_left' (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = (-θ).expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [Real.Angle.expMapCircle_neg, coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, kahler_rotation_left]
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left' Orientation.kahler_rotation_left'
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_right (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler x (o.rotation θ y) = θ.expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, real_smul,
kahler_rightAngleRotation_right, Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_right Orientation.kahler_rotation_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) y = o.oangle x y - θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_left']
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y + θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_right]
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) x = -θ := by simp [hx]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_self_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ x) = θ := by simp [hx]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_self_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) y = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_oangle_right (x y : V) : o.oangle y (o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x) = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev]
simp
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_oangle_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_rotation Orientation.oangle_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.rotation θ x = x ↔ θ = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [eq_comm]
simpa [hx, h] using o.oangle_rotation_right hx hx θ
· intro h
simp [h]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero Orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
x = o.rotation θ x ↔ θ = 0 := by rw [← o.rotation_eq_self_iff_angle_eq_zero hx, eq_comm]
#align orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem rotation_eq_self_iff (x : V) (θ : Real.Angle) : o.rotation θ x = x ↔ x = 0 ∨ θ = 0 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff Orientation.rotation_eq_self_iff
theorem eq_rotation_self_iff (x : V) (θ : Real.Angle) : x = o.rotation θ x ↔ x = 0 ∨ θ = 0 := by
rw [← rotation_eq_self_iff, eq_comm]
#align orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff Orientation.eq_rotation_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq (x y : V) : o.rotation (o.oangle x y) x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← h, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
· intro h
rw [o.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq] <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq Orientation.rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq
theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(θ : Real.Angle) : o.oangle x y = θ ↔ y = (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) • o.rotation θ x := by
have hp := div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)
constructor
· rintro rfl
rw [← LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, ← o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos x y hp, eq_comm,
rotation_oangle_eq_iff_norm_eq, norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hp.le,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)]
· intro hye
rw [hye, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hp, o.oangle_rotation_self_right hx]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero
theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(θ : Real.Angle) : o.oangle x y = θ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • o.rotation θ x := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [o.oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero hx hy] at h
exact ⟨‖y‖ / ‖x‖, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hy) (norm_pos_iff.2 hx), h⟩
· rintro ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ hr, o.oangle_rotation_self_right hx]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero
theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_or_eq_zero {x y : V} (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x y = θ ↔
x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ y = (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) • o.rotation θ x ∨ θ = 0 ∧ (x = 0 ∨ y = 0) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx, eq_comm]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy, eq_comm]
· rw [o.oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero hx hy]
simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_or_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_norm_div_norm_smul_rotation_or_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_or_eq_zero {x y : V} (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x y = θ ↔
(x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • o.rotation θ x) ∨ θ = 0 ∧ (x = 0 ∨ y = 0) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx, eq_comm]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy, eq_comm]
· rw [o.oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_of_ne_zero hx hy]
simp [hx, hy]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_or_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_iff_eq_pos_smul_rotation_or_eq_zero
theorem exists_linearIsometryEquiv_eq_of_det_pos {f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V}
(hd : 0 < LinearMap.det (f.toLinearEquiv : V →ₗ[ℝ] V)) :
∃ θ : Real.Angle, f = o.rotation θ := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
use o.oangle x (f x)
apply LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv_injective
apply LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
symm
fin_cases i
· simp
have : o.oangle (J x) (f (J x)) = o.oangle x (f x) := by
simp only [oangle, o.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation f hd,
o.kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation]
simp [← this]
#align orientation.exists_linear_isometry_equiv_eq_of_det_pos Orientation.exists_linearIsometryEquiv_eq_of_det_pos
theorem rotation_map (θ : Real.Angle) (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') (x : V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).rotation θ x = f (o.rotation θ (f.symm x)) := by
simp [rotation_apply, o.rightAngleRotation_map]
#align orientation.rotation_map Orientation.rotation_map
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.rotation θ z = θ.expMapCircle * z := by
simp only [rotation_apply, Complex.rightAngleRotation, Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle, real_smul]
ring
#align complex.rotation Complex.rotation
theorem rotation_map_complex (θ : Real.Angle) (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x : V) :
f (o.rotation θ x) = θ.expMapCircle * f x := by
rw [← Complex.rotation, ← hf, o.rotation_map, LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_map_complex Orientation.rotation_map_complex
theorem rotation_neg_orientation_eq_neg (θ : Real.Angle) : (-o).rotation θ = o.rotation (-θ) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| by simp [rotation_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_neg_orientation_eq_neg Orientation.rotation_neg_orientation_eq_neg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 424 | 425 | theorem inner_rotation_pi_div_two_left (x : V) : ⟪o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x, x⟫ = 0 := by |
rw [rotation_pi_div_two, inner_rightAngleRotation_self]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle EuclideanGeometry.oangle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (o.continuousAt_oangle hf1 hf2).comp ((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_oangle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left_right
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3)).toEquiv]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affine_independent EuclideanGeometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.affine_independent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vector_span_eq EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_swap EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_swap
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_cyc3 EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_cyc3
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_right_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_left_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_to_real EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
#align euclidean_geometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rotate_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rotate_sign
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
#align sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
#align sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
#align wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
#align wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
by_cases hp₁'p₂ : p₁' = p₂; · rw [hp₁'p₂, wbtw_self_iff] at h; exact False.elim (hp₁p₂ h)
rw [← oangle_add hp₁'p₂ hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, h.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero, zero_add]
#align wbtw.oangle_eq_left Wbtw.oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_left h.ne_left
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_left Sbtw.oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by rw [oangle_rev, h.oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂, ← oangle_rev]
#align wbtw.oangle_eq_right Wbtw.oangle_eq_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_right h.ne_left
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_left
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₁) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_left]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₃ p₂) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases h : p₃ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_right
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_midpoint_rev_right (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ (midpoint ℝ p₂ p₃) = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [midpoint_comm, oangle_midpoint_right]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_midpoint_rev_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
{p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi, oangle_add_swap h.left_ne h.right_ne hp₃p₂]
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
{p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' + π := by
rw [← h.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi, oangle_add hp₁p₂ h.right_ne h.left_ne]
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_add_pi_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h₁ : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁')
(h₃ : Sbtw ℝ p₃ p₂ p₃') : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃' := by
rw [h₁.oangle_eq_add_pi_left h₃.left_ne, h₃.oangle_eq_add_pi_right h₁.right_ne, add_assoc,
Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, add_zero]
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_left_right
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁'} : Set P)) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁'p₂ : p₁' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rcases h.wbtw_or_wbtw_or_wbtw with (hw | hw | hw)
· have hw' : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₁' := ⟨hw, hp₁p₂.symm, hp₁'p₂.symm⟩
rw [hw'.oangle_eq_add_pi_left hp₃p₂, smul_add, Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi, add_zero]
· rw [hw.oangle_eq_left hp₁'p₂]
· rw [hw.symm.oangle_eq_left hp₁p₂]
#align collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P}
(h : Collinear ℝ ({p₃, p₂, p₃'} : Set P)) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) (hp₃'p₂ : p₃' ≠ p₂) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by
rw [oangle_rev, smul_neg, h.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂ hp₃'p₂, ← smul_neg, ← oangle_rev]
#align collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right Collinear.two_zsmul_oangle_eq_right
theorem dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint {p₁ p₂ p : P} (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p = dist p₂ p ↔
∃ r : ℝ, r • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ = p := by
refine ⟨fun hd => ?_, fun hr => ?_⟩
· have hi : ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, p -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 := by
rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, ←
mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm] at hd
simp_rw [vsub_midpoint, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₁ p, inner_sub_left, inner_add_right,
inner_smul_right, hd, real_inner_comm (p -ᵥ p₁)]
abel
rw [@Orientation.inner_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_or_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two V _ _ _ o,
or_iff_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 h.symm)] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [eq_comm, ← eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq] at hr
exact ⟨r, hr.symm⟩
· rcases hr with ⟨r, rfl⟩
simp_rw [@dist_eq_norm_vsub V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, left_vsub_midpoint, right_vsub_midpoint,
invOf_eq_inv, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, ← mul_self_inj (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_sub_sub_self]
simp [-neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint
open AffineSubspace
theorem _root_.Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (p₅ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) (hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P))
(hr : SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) (p₄ -ᵥ p₃)) : (∡ p₁ p₅ p₂).sign = (∡ p₃ p₅ p₄).sign := by
by_cases hc₅₁₂ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂} : Set P)
· have hc₅₁₂₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)) hp₁p₂).2 hc₅₁₂
have hc₅₃₄ : Collinear ℝ ({p₅, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
(hc.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _)))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _
(Set.mem_singleton _)))) hp₃p₄).1 hc₅₁₂₃₄
rw [Set.insert_comm] at hc₅₁₂ hc₅₃₄
have hs₁₅₂ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₁₂
have hs₃₅₄ := oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear.2 hc₅₃₄
rw [← Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at hs₁₅₂ hs₃₅₄
rw [hs₁₅₂, hs₃₅₄]
· let s : Set (P × P × P) :=
(fun x : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] × V => (x.1, p₅, x.2 +ᵥ (x.1 : P))) ''
Set.univ ×ˢ {v | SameRay ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) v ∧ v ≠ 0}
have hco : IsConnected s :=
haveI : ConnectedSpace line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] := AddTorsor.connectedSpace _ _
(isConnected_univ.prod (isConnected_setOf_sameRay_and_ne_zero
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm))).image _
(continuous_fst.subtype_val.prod_mk (continuous_const.prod_mk
(continuous_snd.vadd continuous_fst.subtype_val))).continuousOn
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) s := by
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff, Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, -⟩ := hv
rintro rfl
refine hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan ?_).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))
· exact hq
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ s → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff,
Prod.ext_iff] at hp
obtain ⟨q₁, q₅, q₂⟩ := p
dsimp only at hp ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨⟨q, hq⟩, v⟩, hv, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_setOf] at hv ⊢
obtain ⟨hvr, hv0⟩ := hv
rw [← exists_nonneg_left_iff_sameRay (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm)] at hvr
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := hvr
change q ∈ line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] at hq
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
refine affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem ?_ hq
(fun h => hc₅₁₂ ((collinear_insert_iff_of_mem_affineSpan h).2 (collinear_pair _ _ _))) ?_
· rwa [← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self, zero_sub, neg_ne_zero]
· refine vadd_mem_of_mem_direction ?_ hq
rw [direction_affineSpan]
exact smul_vsub_rev_mem_vectorSpan_pair _ _ _
have hp₁p₂s : (p₁, p₅, p₂) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₁, left_mem_affineSpan_pair ℝ _ _⟩, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟩,
⟨SameRay.rfl, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁p₂.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
have hp₃p₄s : (p₃, p₅, p₄) ∈ s := by
simp_rw [s, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_setOf, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff,
Prod.ext_iff]
refine ⟨⟨⟨p₃, hc.mem_affineSpan_of_mem_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert _ _))) hp₁p₂⟩, p₄ -ᵥ p₃⟩,
⟨hr, vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃p₄.symm⟩, ?_⟩
simp
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hco hf hsp hp₃p₄s hp₁p₂s
#align collinear.oangle_sign_of_same_ray_vsub Collinear.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by simpa using h.wbtw.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ h.left_ne h.ne_right h.wbtw.sameRay_vsub
#align sbtw.oangle_sign_eq Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₁ ≠ p₂) : (∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
haveI hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₁, p₃} : Set P) := by
simpa [Set.insert_comm p₂] using h.collinear
hc.oangle_sign_of_sameRay_vsub _ hne (h.left_ne_right_of_ne_left hne.symm) h.sameRay_vsub_left
#align wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ h.left_ne
#align sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_left
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃)
(hne : p₂ ≠ p₃) : (∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign := by
simp_rw [oangle_rev p₃, Real.Angle.sign_neg, h.symm.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_left _ hne.symm]
#align wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right Wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (p₄ : P) (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) :
(∡ p₂ p₄ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₄ p₃).sign :=
h.wbtw.oangle_sign_eq_of_ne_right _ h.ne_right
#align sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_right Sbtw.oangle_sign_eq_right
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.SSameSide.oangle_sign_eq {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃p₄ : s.SSameSide p₃ p₄) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
let sp : Set (P × P × P) := (fun p : P => (p₁, p, p₂)) '' {p | s.SSameSide p₃ p}
have hc : IsConnected sp := (isConnected_setOf_sSameSide hp₃p₄.2.1 hp₃p₄.nonempty).image _
(continuous_const.prod_mk (Continuous.Prod.mk_left _)).continuousOn
have hf : ContinuousOn (fun p : P × P × P => ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2) sp := by
refine ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun p hp => continuousAt_oangle ?_ ?_
all_goals
simp_rw [sp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf] at hp
obtain ⟨p', hp', rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only
rintro rfl
· exact hp'.2.2 hp₁
· exact hp'.2.2 hp₂
have hsp : ∀ p : P × P × P, p ∈ sp → ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2 ≠ π := by
intro p hp
simp_rw [sp, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_setOf] at hp
obtain ⟨p', hp', rfl⟩ := hp
dsimp only
rw [oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent]
exact affineIndependent_of_ne_of_mem_of_not_mem_of_mem h hp₁ hp'.2.2 hp₂
have hp₃ : (p₁, p₃, p₂) ∈ sp :=
Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (sSameSide_self_iff.2 ⟨hp₃p₄.nonempty, hp₃p₄.2.1⟩)
have hp₄ : (p₁, p₄, p₂) ∈ sp := Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hp₃p₄
convert Real.Angle.sign_eq_of_continuousOn hc hf hsp hp₃ hp₄
#align affine_subspace.s_same_side.oangle_sign_eq AffineSubspace.SSameSide.oangle_sign_eq
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 839 | 845 | theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.SOppSide.oangle_sign_eq_neg {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃p₄ : s.SOppSide p₃ p₄) :
(∡ p₁ p₄ p₂).sign = -(∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by |
have hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by rintro rfl; exact hp₃p₄.left_not_mem hp₁
rw [← (hp₃p₄.symm.trans (sOppSide_pointReflection hp₁ hp₃p₄.left_not_mem)).oangle_sign_eq hp₁ hp₂,
← oangle_rotate_sign p₁, ← oangle_rotate_sign p₁, oangle_swap₁₃_sign,
(sbtw_pointReflection_of_ne ℝ hp₁p₃).symm.oangle_sign_eq _]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import algebra.quandle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"28aa996fc6fb4317f0083c4e6daf79878d81be33"
open MulOpposite
universe u v
class Shelf (α : Type u) where
act : α → α → α
self_distrib : ∀ {x y z : α}, act x (act y z) = act (act x y) (act x z)
#align shelf Shelf
class UnitalShelf (α : Type u) extends Shelf α, One α :=
(one_act : ∀ a : α, act 1 a = a)
(act_one : ∀ a : α, act a 1 = a)
#align unital_shelf UnitalShelf
@[ext]
structure ShelfHom (S₁ : Type*) (S₂ : Type*) [Shelf S₁] [Shelf S₂] where
toFun : S₁ → S₂
map_act' : ∀ {x y : S₁}, toFun (Shelf.act x y) = Shelf.act (toFun x) (toFun y)
#align shelf_hom ShelfHom
#align shelf_hom.ext_iff ShelfHom.ext_iff
#align shelf_hom.ext ShelfHom.ext
class Rack (α : Type u) extends Shelf α where
invAct : α → α → α
left_inv : ∀ x, Function.LeftInverse (invAct x) (act x)
right_inv : ∀ x, Function.RightInverse (invAct x) (act x)
#align rack Rack
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃ " => Shelf.act
scoped[Quandles] infixr:65 " ◃⁻¹ " => Rack.invAct
scoped[Quandles] infixr:25 " →◃ " => ShelfHom
open Quandles
namespace Rack
variable {R : Type*} [Rack R]
-- Porting note: No longer a need for `Rack.self_distrib`
export Shelf (self_distrib)
-- porting note, changed name to `act'` to not conflict with `Shelf.act`
def act' (x : R) : R ≃ R where
toFun := Shelf.act x
invFun := invAct x
left_inv := left_inv x
right_inv := right_inv x
#align rack.act Rack.act'
@[simp]
theorem act'_apply (x y : R) : act' x y = x ◃ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_apply Rack.act'_apply
@[simp]
theorem act'_symm_apply (x y : R) : (act' x).symm y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.act_symm_apply Rack.act'_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_apply (x y : R) : (act' x)⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y :=
rfl
#align rack.inv_act_apply Rack.invAct_apply
@[simp]
theorem invAct_act_eq (x y : R) : x ◃⁻¹ x ◃ y = y :=
left_inv x y
#align rack.inv_act_act_eq Rack.invAct_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem act_invAct_eq (x y : R) : x ◃ x ◃⁻¹ y = y :=
right_inv x y
#align rack.act_inv_act_eq Rack.act_invAct_eq
theorem left_cancel (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃ y = x ◃ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel Rack.left_cancel
theorem left_cancel_inv (x : R) {y y' : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y' ↔ y = y' := by
constructor
· apply (act' x).symm.injective
rintro rfl
rfl
#align rack.left_cancel_inv Rack.left_cancel_inv
theorem self_distrib_inv {x y z : R} : x ◃⁻¹ y ◃⁻¹ z = (x ◃⁻¹ y) ◃⁻¹ x ◃⁻¹ z := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃⁻¹ y), right_inv, ← left_cancel x, right_inv, self_distrib]
repeat' rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_distrib_inv Rack.self_distrib_inv
theorem ad_conj {R : Type*} [Rack R] (x y : R) : act' (x ◃ y) = act' x * act' y * (act' x)⁻¹ := by
rw [eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]; ext z
apply self_distrib.symm
#align rack.ad_conj Rack.ad_conj
instance oppositeRack : Rack Rᵐᵒᵖ where
act x y := op (invAct (unop x) (unop y))
self_distrib := by
intro x y z
induction x using MulOpposite.rec'
induction y using MulOpposite.rec'
induction z using MulOpposite.rec'
simp only [op_inj, unop_op, op_unop]
rw [self_distrib_inv]
invAct x y := op (Shelf.act (unop x) (unop y))
left_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
right_inv := MulOpposite.rec' fun x => MulOpposite.rec' fun y => by simp
#align rack.opposite_rack Rack.oppositeRack
@[simp]
theorem op_act_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃ op y = op (x ◃⁻¹ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_act_op_eq Rack.op_act_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem op_invAct_op_eq {x y : R} : op x ◃⁻¹ op y = op (x ◃ y) :=
rfl
#align rack.op_inv_act_op_eq Rack.op_invAct_op_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_act_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by rw [← right_inv x y, ← self_distrib]
#align rack.self_act_act_eq Rack.self_act_act_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_invAct_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃⁻¹ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by
have h := @self_act_act_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
#align rack.self_inv_act_inv_act_eq Rack.self_invAct_invAct_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_act_invAct_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃ x) ◃⁻¹ y = x ◃⁻¹ y := by
rw [← left_cancel (x ◃ x)]
rw [right_inv]
rw [self_act_act_eq]
rw [right_inv]
#align rack.self_act_inv_act_eq Rack.self_act_invAct_eq
@[simp]
theorem self_invAct_act_eq {x y : R} : (x ◃⁻¹ x) ◃ y = x ◃ y := by
have h := @self_act_invAct_eq _ _ (op x) (op y)
simpa using h
#align rack.self_inv_act_act_eq Rack.self_invAct_act_eq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Quandle.lean | 306 | 312 | theorem self_act_eq_iff_eq {x y : R} : x ◃ x = y ◃ y ↔ x = y := by |
constructor; swap
· rintro rfl; rfl
intro h
trans (x ◃ x) ◃⁻¹ x ◃ x
· rw [← left_cancel (x ◃ x), right_inv, self_act_act_eq]
· rw [h, ← left_cancel (y ◃ y), right_inv, self_act_act_eq]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
#align_import measure_theory.measure.content from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {G : Type w} [TopologicalSpace G]
structure Content (G : Type w) [TopologicalSpace G] where
toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0
mono' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂ → toFun K₁ ≤ toFun K₂
sup_disjoint' :
∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂ → IsClosed (K₁ : Set G) → IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)
→ toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
sup_le' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
#align measure_theory.content MeasureTheory.Content
instance : Inhabited (Content G) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
mono' := by simp
sup_disjoint' := by simp
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
instance : CoeFun (Content G) fun _ => Compacts G → ℝ≥0∞ :=
⟨fun μ s => μ.toFun s⟩
namespace Content
variable (μ : Content G)
theorem apply_eq_coe_toFun (K : Compacts G) : μ K = μ.toFun K :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.content.apply_eq_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Content.apply_eq_coe_toFun
theorem mono (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ := by
simp [apply_eq_coe_toFun, μ.mono' _ _ h]
#align measure_theory.content.mono MeasureTheory.Content.mono
theorem sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂)
(h₁ : IsClosed (K₁ : Set G)) (h₂ : IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)) :
μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simp [apply_eq_coe_toFun, μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h]
#align measure_theory.content.sup_disjoint MeasureTheory.Content.sup_disjoint
theorem sup_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) : μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by
simp only [apply_eq_coe_toFun]
norm_cast
exact μ.sup_le' _ _
#align measure_theory.content.sup_le MeasureTheory.Content.sup_le
theorem lt_top (K : Compacts G) : μ K < ∞ :=
ENNReal.coe_lt_top
#align measure_theory.content.lt_top MeasureTheory.Content.lt_top
theorem empty : μ ⊥ = 0 := by
have := μ.sup_disjoint' ⊥ ⊥
simpa [apply_eq_coe_toFun] using this
#align measure_theory.content.empty MeasureTheory.Content.empty
def innerContent (U : Opens G) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (K : Compacts G) (_ : (K : Set G) ⊆ U), μ K
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent
theorem le_innerContent (K : Compacts G) (U : Opens G) (h2 : (K : Set G) ⊆ U) :
μ K ≤ μ.innerContent U :=
le_iSup_of_le K <| le_iSup (fun _ ↦ (μ.toFun K : ℝ≥0∞)) h2
#align measure_theory.content.le_inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.le_innerContent
theorem innerContent_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (h2 : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K :=
iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ _ (Subset.trans hK' h2)
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_le MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_le
theorem innerContent_of_isCompact {K : Set G} (h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : IsOpen K) :
μ.innerContent ⟨K, h2K⟩ = μ ⟨K, h1K⟩ :=
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun _ hK' => μ.mono _ ⟨K, h1K⟩ hK') (μ.le_innerContent _ _ Subset.rfl)
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_of_is_compact MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_of_isCompact
theorem innerContent_bot : μ.innerContent ⊥ = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
rw [← μ.empty]
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
have : K = ⊥ := by
ext1
rw [subset_empty_iff.mp hK, Compacts.coe_bot]
rw [this]
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_bot MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_bot
theorem innerContent_mono ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_mono MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_mono
theorem innerContent_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.innerContent U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.innerContent U ≤ μ K + ε := by
have h'ε := ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε
rcases le_or_lt (μ.innerContent U) ε with h | h
· exact ⟨⊥, empty_subset _, le_add_left h⟩
have h₂ := ENNReal.sub_lt_self hU h.ne_bot h'ε
conv at h₂ => rhs; rw [innerContent]
simp only [lt_iSup_iff] at h₂
rcases h₂ with ⟨U, h1U, h2U⟩; refine ⟨U, h1U, ?_⟩
rw [← tsub_le_iff_right]; exact le_of_lt h2U
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_exists_compact MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_exists_compact
theorem innerContent_iSup_nat [R1Space G] (U : ℕ → Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (⨆ i : ℕ, U i) ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent (U i) := by
have h3 : ∀ (t : Finset ℕ) (K : ℕ → Compacts G), μ (t.sup K) ≤ t.sum fun i => μ (K i) := by
intro t K
refine Finset.induction_on t ?_ ?_
· simp only [μ.empty, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sup_empty]
· intro n s hn ih
rw [Finset.sup_insert, Finset.sum_insert hn]
exact le_trans (μ.sup_le _ _) (add_le_add_left ih _)
refine iSup₂_le fun K hK => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
K.isCompact.elim_finite_subcover _ (fun i => (U i).isOpen) (by rwa [← Opens.coe_iSup])
rcases K.isCompact.finite_compact_cover t (SetLike.coe ∘ U) (fun i _ => (U i).isOpen) ht with
⟨K', h1K', h2K', h3K'⟩
let L : ℕ → Compacts G := fun n => ⟨K' n, h1K' n⟩
convert le_trans (h3 t L) _
· ext1
rw [Compacts.coe_finset_sup, Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
exact h3K'
refine le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum ?_) (ENNReal.sum_le_tsum t)
intro i _
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (L i))
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (h2K' i))
rfl
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_Sup_nat MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_iSup_nat
theorem innerContent_iUnion_nat [R1Space G] ⦃U : ℕ → Set G⦄
(hU : ∀ i : ℕ, IsOpen (U i)) :
μ.innerContent ⟨⋃ i : ℕ, U i, isOpen_iUnion hU⟩ ≤ ∑' i : ℕ, μ.innerContent ⟨U i, hU i⟩ := by
have := μ.innerContent_iSup_nat fun i => ⟨U i, hU i⟩
rwa [Opens.iSup_def] at this
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_Union_nat MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_iUnion_nat
theorem innerContent_comap (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(U : Opens G) : μ.innerContent (Opens.comap f.toContinuousMap U) = μ.innerContent U := by
refine (Compacts.equiv f).surjective.iSup_congr _ fun K => iSup_congr_Prop image_subset_iff ?_
intro hK
simp only [Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Compacts.equiv]
apply h
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_comap MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(U : Opens G) :
μ.innerContent (Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g).toContinuousMap U) = μ.innerContent U := by
convert μ.innerContent_comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) U
#align measure_theory.content.is_mul_left_invariant_inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent
#align measure_theory.content.is_add_left_invariant_inner_content MeasureTheory.Content.is_add_left_invariant_innerContent
@[to_additive]
theorem innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (K : Compacts G)
(hK : μ K ≠ 0) (U : Opens G) (hU : (U : Set G).Nonempty) : 0 < μ.innerContent U := by
have : (interior (U : Set G)).Nonempty := by rwa [U.isOpen.interior_eq]
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates K.2 this with ⟨s, hs⟩
suffices μ K ≤ s.card * μ.innerContent U by
exact (ENNReal.mul_pos_iff.mp <| hK.bot_lt.trans_le this).2
have : (K : Set G) ⊆ ↑(⨆ g ∈ s, Opens.comap (Homeomorph.mulLeft g).toContinuousMap U) := by
simpa only [Opens.iSup_def, Opens.coe_comap, Subtype.coe_mk]
refine (μ.le_innerContent _ _ this).trans ?_
refine
(rel_iSup_sum μ.innerContent μ.innerContent_bot (· ≤ ·) μ.innerContent_iSup_nat _ _).trans ?_
simp only [μ.is_mul_left_invariant_innerContent h3, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, le_refl]
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_pos_of_is_add_left_invariant MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_pos_of_is_add_left_invariant
theorem innerContent_mono' ⦃U V : Set G⦄ (hU : IsOpen U) (hV : IsOpen V) (h2 : U ⊆ V) :
μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ ≤ μ.innerContent ⟨V, hV⟩ :=
biSup_mono fun _ hK => hK.trans h2
#align measure_theory.content.inner_content_mono' MeasureTheory.Content.innerContent_mono'
section OuterMeasure
protected def outerMeasure : OuterMeasure G :=
inducedOuterMeasure (fun U hU => μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩) isOpen_empty μ.innerContent_bot
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure
variable [R1Space G]
theorem outerMeasure_opens (U : Opens G) : μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent U :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq' (fun _ => isOpen_iUnion) μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono U.2
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_opens MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_opens
theorem outerMeasure_of_isOpen (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) :
μ.outerMeasure U = μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
μ.outerMeasure_opens ⟨U, hU⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_of_is_open MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_of_isOpen
theorem outerMeasure_le (U : Opens G) (K : Compacts G) (hUK : (U : Set G) ⊆ K) :
μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens U).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le U K hUK
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_le MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_le
theorem le_outerMeasure_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ K ≤ μ.outerMeasure K := by
rw [Content.outerMeasure, inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf]
· exact le_iInf fun U => le_iInf fun hU => le_iInf <| μ.le_innerContent K ⟨U, hU⟩
· exact fun U hU => isOpen_iUnion hU
· exact μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat
· exact μ.innerContent_mono
#align measure_theory.content.le_outer_measure_compacts MeasureTheory.Content.le_outerMeasure_compacts
theorem outerMeasure_eq_iInf (A : Set G) :
μ.outerMeasure A = ⨅ (U : Set G) (hU : IsOpen U) (_ : A ⊆ U), μ.innerContent ⟨U, hU⟩ :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono A
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_eq_infi MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_eq_iInf
theorem outerMeasure_interior_compacts (K : Compacts G) : μ.outerMeasure (interior K) ≤ μ K :=
(μ.outerMeasure_opens <| Opens.interior K).le.trans <| μ.innerContent_le _ _ interior_subset
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_interior_compacts MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_interior_compacts
theorem outerMeasure_exists_compact {U : Opens G} (hU : μ.outerMeasure U ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ K : Compacts G, (K : Set G) ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure K + ε := by
rw [μ.outerMeasure_opens] at hU ⊢
rcases μ.innerContent_exists_compact hU hε with ⟨K, h1K, h2K⟩
exact ⟨K, h1K, le_trans h2K <| add_le_add_right (μ.le_outerMeasure_compacts K) _⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_exists_compact MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_exists_compact
theorem outerMeasure_exists_open {A : Set G} (hA : μ.outerMeasure A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U : Opens G, A ⊆ U ∧ μ.outerMeasure U ≤ μ.outerMeasure A + ε := by
rcases inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono hA
(ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hε) with
⟨U, hU, h2U, h3U⟩
exact ⟨⟨U, hU⟩, h2U, h3U⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_exists_open MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_exists_open
theorem outerMeasure_preimage (f : G ≃ₜ G) (h : ∀ ⦃K : Compacts G⦄, μ (K.map f f.continuous) = μ K)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure (f ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
refine inducedOuterMeasure_preimage _ μ.innerContent_iUnion_nat μ.innerContent_mono _
(fun _ => f.isOpen_preimage) ?_
intro s hs
convert μ.innerContent_comap f h ⟨s, hs⟩
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_preimage MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_preimage
theorem outerMeasure_lt_top_of_isCompact [WeaklyLocallyCompactSpace G]
{K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) :
μ.outerMeasure K < ∞ := by
rcases exists_compact_superset hK with ⟨F, h1F, h2F⟩
calc
μ.outerMeasure K ≤ μ.outerMeasure (interior F) := measure_mono h2F
_ ≤ μ ⟨F, h1F⟩ := by
apply μ.outerMeasure_le ⟨interior F, isOpen_interior⟩ ⟨F, h1F⟩ interior_subset
_ < ⊤ := μ.lt_top _
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_lt_top_of_is_compact MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_lt_top_of_isCompact
@[to_additive]
theorem is_mul_left_invariant_outerMeasure [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (g : G)
(A : Set G) : μ.outerMeasure ((g * ·) ⁻¹' A) = μ.outerMeasure A := by
convert μ.outerMeasure_preimage (Homeomorph.mulLeft g) (fun K => h g) A
#align measure_theory.content.is_mul_left_invariant_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Content.is_mul_left_invariant_outerMeasure
#align measure_theory.content.is_add_left_invariant_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Content.is_add_left_invariant_outerMeasure
theorem outerMeasure_caratheodory (A : Set G) :
MeasurableSet[μ.outerMeasure.caratheodory] A ↔
∀ U : Opens G, μ.outerMeasure (U ∩ A) + μ.outerMeasure (U \ A) ≤ μ.outerMeasure U := by
rw [Opens.forall]
apply inducedOuterMeasure_caratheodory
· apply innerContent_iUnion_nat
· apply innerContent_mono'
#align measure_theory.content.outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.Content.outerMeasure_caratheodory
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Content.lean | 341 | 345 | theorem outerMeasure_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant [Group G] [TopologicalGroup G]
(h3 : ∀ (g : G) {K : Compacts G}, μ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = μ K) (K : Compacts G)
(hK : μ K ≠ 0) {U : Set G} (h1U : IsOpen U) (h2U : U.Nonempty) : 0 < μ.outerMeasure U := by |
convert μ.innerContent_pos_of_is_mul_left_invariant h3 K hK ⟨U, h1U⟩ h2U
exact μ.outerMeasure_opens ⟨U, h1U⟩
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
#align_import linear_algebra.orientation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0c1d80f5a86b36c1db32e021e8d19ae7809d5b79"
noncomputable section
section OrderedCommSemiring
variable (R : Type*) [StrictOrderedCommSemiring R]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (ι ι' : Type*)
abbrev Orientation := Module.Ray R (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R)
#align orientation Orientation
class Module.Oriented where
positiveOrientation : Orientation R M ι
#align module.oriented Module.Oriented
export Module.Oriented (positiveOrientation)
variable {R M}
def Orientation.map (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R N ι :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domLCongr R R ι R e
#align orientation.map Orientation.map
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_apply (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.map ι e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.compLinearMap e.symm) (mt (v.compLinearEquiv_eq_zero_iff e.symm).mp hv) :=
rfl
#align orientation.map_apply Orientation.map_apply
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_refl : (Orientation.map ι <| LinearEquiv.refl R M) = Equiv.refl _ := by
rw [Orientation.map, AlternatingMap.domLCongr_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
#align orientation.map_refl Orientation.map_refl
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.map_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] N) :
(Orientation.map ι e).symm = Orientation.map ι e.symm := rfl
#align orientation.map_symm Orientation.map_symm
section Reindex
variable (R M) {ι ι'}
def Orientation.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι') : Orientation R M ι ≃ Orientation R M ι' :=
Module.Ray.map <| AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ R e
#align orientation.reindex Orientation.reindex
@[simp]
theorem Orientation.reindex_apply (e : ι ≃ ι') (v : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (hv : v ≠ 0) :
Orientation.reindex R M e (rayOfNeZero _ v hv) =
rayOfNeZero _ (v.domDomCongr e) (mt (v.domDomCongr_eq_zero_iff e).mp hv) :=
rfl
#align orientation.reindex_apply Orientation.reindex_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Orientation.lean | 100 | 101 | theorem Orientation.reindex_refl : (Orientation.reindex R M <| Equiv.refl ι) = Equiv.refl _ := by |
rw [Orientation.reindex, AlternatingMap.domDomCongrₗ_refl, Module.Ray.map_refl]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 114 | 119 | theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by |
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
#align_import data.polynomial.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
variable (f : R →+* S) (x : S)
irreducible_def eval₂ (p : R[X]) : S :=
p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e
#align polynomial.eval₂ Polynomial.eval₂
theorem eval₂_eq_sum {f : R →+* S} {x : S} : p.eval₂ f x = p.sum fun e a => f a * x ^ e := by
rw [eval₂_def]
#align polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum Polynomial.eval₂_eq_sum
theorem eval₂_congr {R S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] {f g : R →+* S} {s t : S}
{φ ψ : R[X]} : f = g → s = t → φ = ψ → eval₂ f s φ = eval₂ g t ψ := by
rintro rfl rfl rfl; rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_congr Polynomial.eval₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_at_zero : p.eval₂ f 0 = f (coeff p 0) := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [eval₂_eq_sum, zero_pow_eq, mul_ite, mul_zero,
mul_one, sum, Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, sum_ite_eq', ite_eq_left_iff,
RingHom.map_zero, imp_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true]
#align polynomial.eval₂_at_zero Polynomial.eval₂_at_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_zero : (0 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 0 := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_zero Polynomial.eval₂_zero
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C : (C a).eval₂ f x = f a := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_C Polynomial.eval₂_C
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X : X.eval₂ f x = x := by simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X Polynomial.eval₂_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_monomial {n : ℕ} {r : R} : (monomial n r).eval₂ f x = f r * x ^ n := by
simp [eval₂_eq_sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_monomial Polynomial.eval₂_monomial
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_pow {n : ℕ} : (X ^ n).eval₂ f x = x ^ n := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial]
convert eval₂_monomial f x (n := n) (r := 1)
simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_pow Polynomial.eval₂_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_add : (p + q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x + q.eval₂ f x := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum]
apply sum_add_index <;> simp [add_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_add Polynomial.eval₂_add
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_one : (1 : R[X]).eval₂ f x = 1 := by rw [← C_1, eval₂_C, f.map_one]
#align polynomial.eval₂_one Polynomial.eval₂_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit0 : (bit0 p).eval₂ f x = bit0 (p.eval₂ f x) := by rw [bit0, eval₂_add, bit0]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit0 Polynomial.eval₂_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_bit1 : (bit1 p).eval₂ f x = bit1 (p.eval₂ f x) := by
rw [bit1, eval₂_add, eval₂_bit0, eval₂_one, bit1]
#align polynomial.eval₂_bit1 Polynomial.eval₂_bit1
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_smul (g : R →+* S) (p : R[X]) (x : S) {s : R} :
eval₂ g x (s • p) = g s * eval₂ g x p := by
have A : p.natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := Nat.lt_succ_self _
have B : (s • p).natDegree < p.natDegree.succ := (natDegree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt A
rw [eval₂_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum, sum_over_range' _ _ _ A, sum_over_range' _ _ _ B] <;>
simp [mul_sum, mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.eval₂_smul Polynomial.eval₂_smul
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_C_X : eval₂ C X p = p :=
Polynomial.induction_on' p (fun p q hp hq => by simp [hp, hq]) fun n x => by
rw [eval₂_monomial, ← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul']
#align polynomial.eval₂_C_X Polynomial.eval₂_C_X
@[simps]
def eval₂AddMonoidHom : R[X] →+ S where
toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom
#align polynomial.eval₂_add_monoid_hom_apply Polynomial.eval₂AddMonoidHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).eval₂ f x = n := by
induction' n with n ih
-- Porting note: `Nat.zero_eq` is required.
· simp only [eval₂_zero, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· rw [n.cast_succ, eval₂_add, ih, eval₂_one, n.cast_succ]
#align polynomial.eval₂_nat_cast Polynomial.eval₂_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias eval₂_nat_cast := eval₂_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
lemma eval₂_ofNat {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (f : R →+* S) (a : S) :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R[X])).eval₂ f a = OfNat.ofNat n := by
simp [OfNat.ofNat]
variable [Semiring T]
theorem eval₂_sum (p : T[X]) (g : ℕ → T → R[X]) (x : S) :
(p.sum g).eval₂ f x = p.sum fun n a => (g n a).eval₂ f x := by
let T : R[X] →+ S :=
{ toFun := eval₂ f x
map_zero' := eval₂_zero _ _
map_add' := fun p q => eval₂_add _ _ }
have A : ∀ y, eval₂ f x y = T y := fun y => rfl
simp only [A]
rw [sum, map_sum, sum]
#align polynomial.eval₂_sum Polynomial.eval₂_sum
theorem eval₂_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (x : S) : eval₂ f x l.sum = (l.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_list_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) l
#align polynomial.eval₂_list_sum Polynomial.eval₂_list_sum
theorem eval₂_multiset_sum (s : Multiset R[X]) (x : S) :
eval₂ f x s.sum = (s.map (eval₂ f x)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) s
#align polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_multiset_sum
theorem eval₂_finset_sum (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R[X]) (x : S) :
(∑ i ∈ s, g i).eval₂ f x = ∑ i ∈ s, (g i).eval₂ f x :=
map_sum (eval₂AddMonoidHom f x) _ _
#align polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum Polynomial.eval₂_finset_sum
theorem eval₂_ofFinsupp {f : R →+* S} {x : S} {p : R[ℕ]} :
eval₂ f x (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = liftNC (↑f) (powersHom S x) p := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum, toFinsupp_sum, support, coeff]
rfl
#align polynomial.eval₂_of_finsupp Polynomial.eval₂_ofFinsupp
theorem eval₂_mul_noncomm (hf : ∀ k, Commute (f <| q.coeff k) x) :
eval₂ f x (p * q) = eval₂ f x p * eval₂ f x q := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp only [coeff] at hf
simp only [← ofFinsupp_mul, eval₂_ofFinsupp]
exact liftNC_mul _ _ p q fun {k n} _hn => (hf k).pow_right n
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm Polynomial.eval₂_mul_noncomm
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_mul_X : eval₂ f x (p * X) = eval₂ f x p * x := by
refine _root_.trans (eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ fun k => ?_) (by rw [eval₂_X])
rcases em (k = 1) with (rfl | hk)
· simp
· simp [coeff_X_of_ne_one hk]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_X Polynomial.eval₂_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_X_mul : eval₂ f x (X * p) = eval₂ f x p * x := by rw [X_mul, eval₂_mul_X]
#align polynomial.eval₂_X_mul Polynomial.eval₂_X_mul
theorem eval₂_mul_C' (h : Commute (f a) x) : eval₂ f x (p * C a) = eval₂ f x p * f a := by
rw [eval₂_mul_noncomm, eval₂_C]
intro k
by_cases hk : k = 0
· simp only [hk, h, coeff_C_zero, coeff_C_ne_zero]
· simp only [coeff_C_ne_zero hk, RingHom.map_zero, Commute.zero_left]
#align polynomial.eval₂_mul_C' Polynomial.eval₂_mul_C'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Eval.lean | 212 | 218 | theorem eval₂_list_prod_noncomm (ps : List R[X])
(hf : ∀ p ∈ ps, ∀ (k), Commute (f <| coeff p k) x) :
eval₂ f x ps.prod = (ps.map (Polynomial.eval₂ f x)).prod := by |
induction' ps using List.reverseRecOn with ps p ihp
· simp
· simp only [List.forall_mem_append, List.forall_mem_singleton] at hf
simp [eval₂_mul_noncomm _ _ hf.2, ihp hf.1]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
#align_import topology.uniform_space.equicontinuity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y Z α α' β β' γ 𝓕 : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[tZ : TopologicalSpace Z] [uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
#align equicontinuous_at EquicontinuousAt
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
#align set.equicontinuous_at Set.EquicontinuousAt
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
#align equicontinuous Equicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
#align set.equicontinuous Set.Equicontinuous
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
#align uniform_equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous Set.UniformEquicontinuous
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prod_map, ← map_comap]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prod_mk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_pair equicontinuousAt_iff_pair
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
#align uniform_equicontinuous.equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
#align equicontinuous_at.continuous_at EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous_at.continuous_at_of_mem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
#align equicontinuous.continuous Equicontinuous.continuous
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous_of_mem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align equicontinuous_at.comp EquicontinuousAt.comp
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous_at.mono Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
#align equicontinuous.comp Equicontinuous.comp
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous.mono Set.Equicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.comp UniformEquicontinuous.comp
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.mono Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_range equicontinuousAt_iff_range
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
#align equicontinuous_iff_range equicontinuous_iff_range
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
#align uniform_equicontinuous_at_iff_range uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_continuous_at equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
#align equicontinuous_iff_continuous equicontinuous_iff_continuous
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align uniform_equicontinuous_iff_uniform_continuous uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 588 | 593 | theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'}
{S : Set β} : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔
∀ k, UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by |
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uα := _)]
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sym
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.inc_matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bb168510ef455e9280a152e7f31673cabd3d7496"
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph Sym2
open Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (R : Type*) {α : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph α)
noncomputable def incMatrix [Zero R] [One R] : Matrix α (Sym2 α) R := fun a =>
(G.incidenceSet a).indicator 1
#align simple_graph.inc_matrix SimpleGraph.incMatrix
variable {R}
theorem incMatrix_apply [Zero R] [One R] {a : α} {e : Sym2 α} :
G.incMatrix R a e = (G.incidenceSet a).indicator 1 e :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.inc_matrix_apply SimpleGraph.incMatrix_apply
theorem incMatrix_apply' [Zero R] [One R] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableRel G.Adj] {a : α}
{e : Sym2 α} : G.incMatrix R a e = if e ∈ G.incidenceSet a then 1 else 0 := by
unfold incMatrix Set.indicator
convert rfl
#align simple_graph.inc_matrix_apply' SimpleGraph.incMatrix_apply'
section MulZeroOneClass
variable [MulZeroOneClass R] {a b : α} {e : Sym2 α}
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/IncMatrix.lean | 79 | 82 | theorem incMatrix_apply_mul_incMatrix_apply : G.incMatrix R a e * G.incMatrix R b e =
(G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b).indicator 1 e := by |
classical simp only [incMatrix, Set.indicator_apply, ite_zero_mul_ite_zero, Pi.one_apply, mul_one,
Set.mem_inter_iff]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Types
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
universe w v u t r
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits.Concrete
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
section Products
section WidePushout
open WidePushout
open WidePushoutShape
variable [ConcreteCategory.{v} C]
theorem widePushout_exists_rep {B : C} {α : Type _} {X : α → C} (f : ∀ j : α, B ⟶ X j)
[HasWidePushout.{v} B X f] [PreservesColimit (wideSpan B X f) (forget C)]
(x : ↑(widePushout B X f)) : (∃ y : B, head f y = x) ∨ ∃ (i : α) (y : X i), ι f i y = x := by
obtain ⟨_ | j, y, rfl⟩ := Concrete.colimit_exists_rep _ x
· left
use y
rfl
· right
use j, y
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.concrete.wide_pushout_exists_rep CategoryTheory.Limits.Concrete.widePushout_exists_rep
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ConcreteCategory.lean | 336 | 343 | theorem widePushout_exists_rep' {B : C} {α : Type _} [Nonempty α] {X : α → C}
(f : ∀ j : α, B ⟶ X j) [HasWidePushout.{v} B X f] [PreservesColimit (wideSpan B X f) (forget C)]
(x : ↑(widePushout B X f)) : ∃ (i : α) (y : X i), ι f i y = x := by |
rcases Concrete.widePushout_exists_rep f x with (⟨y, rfl⟩ | ⟨i, y, rfl⟩)
· inhabit α
use default, f _ y
simp only [← arrow_ι _ default, comp_apply]
· use i, y
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Sigma
#align_import data.finset.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
open Function Multiset
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace Finset
section SigmaLift
variable {α β γ : ι → Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
def sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β) :
Finset (Sigma γ) :=
dite (a.1 = b.1) (fun h => (f (h ▸ a.2) b.2).map <| Embedding.sigmaMk _) fun _ => ∅
#align finset.sigma_lift Finset.sigmaLift
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sigma.lean | 156 | 173 | theorem mem_sigmaLift (f : ∀ ⦃i⦄, α i → β i → Finset (γ i)) (a : Sigma α) (b : Sigma β)
(x : Sigma γ) :
x ∈ sigmaLift f a b ↔ ∃ (ha : a.1 = x.1) (hb : b.1 = x.1), x.2 ∈ f (ha ▸ a.2) (hb ▸ b.2) := by |
obtain ⟨⟨i, a⟩, j, b⟩ := a, b
obtain rfl | h := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· constructor
· simp_rw [sigmaLift]
simp only [dite_eq_ite, ite_true, mem_map, Embedding.sigmaMk_apply, forall_exists_index,
and_imp]
rintro x hx rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, hx⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, hx⟩
rw [sigmaLift, dif_pos rfl, mem_map]
exact ⟨_, hx, by simp [Sigma.ext_iff]⟩
· rw [sigmaLift, dif_neg h]
refine iff_of_false (not_mem_empty _) ?_
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, ⟨⟩, _⟩
exact h rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
#align_import algebra.polynomial.big_operators from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47adfab39a11a072db552f47594bf8ed2cf8a722"
open Finset
open Multiset
open Polynomial
universe u w
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type w}
namespace Polynomial
variable (s : Finset ι)
section Semiring
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S]
set_option backward.isDefEq.lazyProjDelta false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12535
theorem natDegree_list_sum_le (l : List S[X]) : natDegree l.sum ≤ (l.map natDegree).foldr max 0 :=
List.sum_le_foldr_max natDegree (by simp) natDegree_add_le _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_list_sum_le Polynomial.natDegree_list_sum_le
theorem natDegree_multiset_sum_le (l : Multiset S[X]) :
natDegree l.sum ≤ (l.map natDegree).foldr max max_left_comm 0 :=
Quotient.inductionOn l (by simpa using natDegree_list_sum_le)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_multiset_sum_le Polynomial.natDegree_multiset_sum_le
theorem natDegree_sum_le (f : ι → S[X]) :
natDegree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ s.fold max 0 (natDegree ∘ f) := by
simpa using natDegree_multiset_sum_le (s.val.map f)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_sum_le Polynomial.natDegree_sum_le
lemma natDegree_sum_le_of_forall_le {n : ℕ} (f : ι → S[X]) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, natDegree (f i) ≤ n) :
natDegree (∑ i ∈ s, f i) ≤ n :=
le_trans (natDegree_sum_le s f) <| (Finset.fold_max_le n).mpr <| by simpa
theorem degree_list_sum_le (l : List S[X]) : degree l.sum ≤ (l.map natDegree).maximum := by
by_cases h : l.sum = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree h]
suffices (l.map natDegree).maximum = ((l.map natDegree).foldr max 0 : ℕ) by
rw [this]
simpa using natDegree_list_sum_le l
rw [← List.foldr_max_of_ne_nil]
· congr
contrapose! h
rw [List.map_eq_nil] at h
simp [h]
#align polynomial.degree_list_sum_le Polynomial.degree_list_sum_le
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/BigOperators.lean | 80 | 83 | theorem natDegree_list_prod_le (l : List S[X]) : natDegree l.prod ≤ (l.map natDegree).sum := by |
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp
· simpa using natDegree_mul_le.trans (add_le_add_left IH _)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
-- In this file, we would like to use multi-character auto-implicits.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
mutual
inductive ExBase : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| atom (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
| sum (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
inductive ExProd : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| const (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
| mul {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
inductive ExSum : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| zero {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
| add {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
partial def ExBase.eq : ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq : ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq : ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
partial def ExBase.cmp : ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp : ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp : ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
partial def ExBase.cast : ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
partial def ExProd.cast : ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
partial def ExSum.cast : ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
expr : Q($α)
val : E expr
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] : Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) [CommSemiring R]
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
variable {sα}
def ExBase.toProd (va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
def ExProd.toSum (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) := .add v .zero
def ExProd.coeff : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
def evalAddOverlap (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) : Option (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) :=
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => none
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
partial def evalAdd (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) : Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) :=
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁ with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ := evalAdd va₂ vb₂
⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ := evalAdd va₂ vb₂
⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ := evalAdd va₂ vb
⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ := evalAdd va vb₂
⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 359 | 359 | theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by | simp [Nat.rawCast]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.hom_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_hom_whiskerRight
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeftIso
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerLeft
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRightIso
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 288 | 292 | theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by |
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
#align_import measure_theory.covering.vitali_family from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open Filter MeasureTheory Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α]
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure VitaliFamily {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) where
setsAt : α → Set (Set α)
measurableSet : ∀ x : α, ∀ s ∈ setsAt x, MeasurableSet s
nonempty_interior : ∀ x : α, ∀ s ∈ setsAt x, (interior s).Nonempty
nontrivial : ∀ (x : α), ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s ∈ setsAt x, s ⊆ closedBall x ε
covering : ∀ (s : Set α) (f : α → Set (Set α)),
(∀ x ∈ s, f x ⊆ setsAt x) → (∀ x ∈ s, ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ a ∈ f x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε) →
∃ t : Set (α × Set α), (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ (t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p ↦ p.2) ∧
(∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ t, p.2) = 0
#align vitali_family VitaliFamily
namespace VitaliFamily
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
def mono (v : VitaliFamily μ) (ν : Measure α) (hν : ν ≪ μ) : VitaliFamily ν where
__ := v
covering s f h h' :=
let ⟨t, ts, disj, mem_f, hμ⟩ := v.covering s f h h'
⟨t, ts, disj, mem_f, hν hμ⟩
#align vitali_family.mono VitaliFamily.mono
def FineSubfamilyOn (v : VitaliFamily μ) (f : α → Set (Set α)) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ ε > 0, ∃ a ∈ v.setsAt x ∩ f x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε
#align vitali_family.fine_subfamily_on VitaliFamily.FineSubfamilyOn
def enlarge (v : VitaliFamily μ) (δ : ℝ) (δpos : 0 < δ) : VitaliFamily μ where
setsAt x := v.setsAt x ∪ { a | MeasurableSet a ∧ (interior a).Nonempty ∧ ¬a ⊆ closedBall x δ }
measurableSet x a ha := by
cases' ha with ha ha
exacts [v.measurableSet _ _ ha, ha.1]
nonempty_interior x a ha := by
cases' ha with ha ha
exacts [v.nonempty_interior _ _ ha, ha.2.1]
nontrivial := by
intro x ε εpos
rcases v.nontrivial x ε εpos with ⟨a, ha, h'a⟩
exact ⟨a, mem_union_left _ ha, h'a⟩
covering := by
intro s f fset ffine
let g : α → Set (Set α) := fun x => f x ∩ v.setsAt x
have : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ ε : ℝ, ε > 0 → ∃ (a : Set α), a ∈ g x ∧ a ⊆ closedBall x ε := by
intro x hx ε εpos
obtain ⟨a, af, ha⟩ : ∃ a ∈ f x, a ⊆ closedBall x (min ε δ) :=
ffine x hx (min ε δ) (lt_min εpos δpos)
rcases fset x hx af with (h'a | h'a)
· exact ⟨a, ⟨af, h'a⟩, ha.trans (closedBall_subset_closedBall (min_le_left _ _))⟩
· refine False.elim (h'a.2.2 ?_)
exact ha.trans (closedBall_subset_closedBall (min_le_right _ _))
rcases v.covering s g (fun x _ => inter_subset_right) this with ⟨t, ts, tdisj, tg, μt⟩
exact ⟨t, ts, tdisj, fun p hp => (tg p hp).1, μt⟩
#align vitali_family.enlarge VitaliFamily.enlarge
variable (v : VitaliFamily μ)
def filterAt (x : α) : Filter (Set α) := (𝓝 x).smallSets ⊓ 𝓟 (v.setsAt x)
#align vitali_family.filter_at VitaliFamily.filterAt
theorem _root_.Filter.HasBasis.vitaliFamily {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {x : α}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : (v.filterAt x).HasBasis p (fun i ↦ {t ∈ v.setsAt x | t ⊆ s i}) := by
simpa only [← Set.setOf_inter_eq_sep] using h.smallSets.inf_principal _
theorem filterAt_basis_closedBall (x : α) :
(v.filterAt x).HasBasis (0 < ·) ({a ∈ v.setsAt x | a ⊆ closedBall x ·}) :=
nhds_basis_closedBall.vitaliFamily v
theorem mem_filterAt_iff {x : α} {s : Set (Set α)} :
s ∈ v.filterAt x ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∀ a ∈ v.setsAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε → a ∈ s := by
simp only [(v.filterAt_basis_closedBall x).mem_iff, ← and_imp, subset_def, mem_setOf]
#align vitali_family.mem_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.mem_filterAt_iff
instance filterAt_neBot (x : α) : (v.filterAt x).NeBot :=
(v.filterAt_basis_closedBall x).neBot_iff.2 <| v.nontrivial _ _
#align vitali_family.filter_at_ne_bot VitaliFamily.filterAt_neBot
theorem eventually_filterAt_iff {x : α} {P : Set α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, P a) ↔ ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∀ a ∈ v.setsAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε → P a :=
v.mem_filterAt_iff
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_iff
theorem tendsto_filterAt_iff {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {f : ι → Set α} {x : α} :
Tendsto f l (v.filterAt x) ↔
(∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ v.setsAt x) ∧ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ⊆ closedBall x ε := by
simp only [filterAt, tendsto_inf, nhds_basis_closedBall.smallSets.tendsto_right_iff,
tendsto_principal, and_comm, mem_powerset_iff]
#align vitali_family.tendsto_filter_at_iff VitaliFamily.tendsto_filterAt_iff
theorem eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, a ∈ v.setsAt x :=
(v.tendsto_filterAt_iff.mp tendsto_id).1
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_mem_sets VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt
theorem eventually_filterAt_subset_closedBall (x : α) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∀ᶠ a : Set α in v.filterAt x, a ⊆ closedBall x ε :=
(v.tendsto_filterAt_iff.mp tendsto_id).2 ε hε
#align vitali_family.eventually_filter_at_subset_closed_ball VitaliFamily.eventually_filterAt_subset_closedBall
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/VitaliFamily.lean | 264 | 265 | theorem eventually_filterAt_measurableSet (x : α) : ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, MeasurableSet a := by |
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x] with _ ha using v.measurableSet _ _ ha
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.SimplexCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Arrow
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Opposites
#align_import algebraic_topology.simplicial_object from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5ed51dc37c6b891b79314ee11a50adc2b1df6fd6"
open Opposite
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u v' u'
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def SimplicialObject :=
SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ ⥤ C
#align category_theory.simplicial_object CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject
@[simps!]
instance : Category (SimplicialObject C) := by
dsimp only [SimplicialObject]
infer_instance
namespace SimplicialObject
set_option quotPrecheck false in
scoped[Simplicial]
notation3:1000 X " _[" n "]" =>
(X : CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject _).obj (Opposite.op (SimplexCategory.mk n))
open Simplicial
instance {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [HasLimitsOfShape J C] :
HasLimitsOfShape J (SimplicialObject C) := by
dsimp [SimplicialObject]
infer_instance
instance [HasLimits C] : HasLimits (SimplicialObject C) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
instance {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [HasColimitsOfShape J C] :
HasColimitsOfShape J (SimplicialObject C) := by
dsimp [SimplicialObject]
infer_instance
instance [HasColimits C] : HasColimits (SimplicialObject C) :=
⟨inferInstance⟩
variable {C}
-- Porting note (#10688): added to ease automation
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {X Y : SimplicialObject C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(h : ∀ (n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ), f.app n = g.app n) : f = g :=
NatTrans.ext _ _ (by ext; apply h)
variable (X : SimplicialObject C)
def δ {n} (i : Fin (n + 2)) : X _[n + 1] ⟶ X _[n] :=
X.map (SimplexCategory.δ i).op
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ
def σ {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : X _[n] ⟶ X _[n + 1] :=
X.map (SimplexCategory.σ i).op
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.σ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.σ
def eqToIso {n m : ℕ} (h : n = m) : X _[n] ≅ X _[m] :=
X.mapIso (CategoryTheory.eqToIso (by congr))
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.eq_to_iso CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.eqToIso
@[simp]
theorem eqToIso_refl {n : ℕ} (h : n = n) : X.eqToIso h = Iso.refl _ := by
ext
simp [eqToIso]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.eq_to_iso_refl CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.eqToIso_refl
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ j) :
X.δ j.succ ≫ X.δ i = X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ X.δ j := by
dsimp [δ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ H]
#align category_theory.simplicial_object.δ_comp_δ CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SimplicialObject.lean | 114 | 119 | theorem δ_comp_δ' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : Fin.castSucc i < j) :
X.δ j ≫ X.δ i =
X.δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫
X.δ (j.pred fun (hj : j = 0) => by simp [hj, Fin.not_lt_zero] at H) := by |
dsimp [δ]
simp only [← X.map_comp, ← op_comp, SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ' H]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.midpoint from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open AffineMap AffineEquiv
section
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*} [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
def midpoint (x y : P) : P :=
lineMap x y (⅟ 2 : R)
#align midpoint midpoint
variable {R} {x y z : P}
@[simp]
theorem AffineMap.map_midpoint (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
#align affine_map.map_midpoint AffineMap.map_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.map_midpoint (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
#align affine_equiv.map_midpoint AffineEquiv.map_midpoint
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align affine_equiv.point_reflection_midpoint_left AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left
@[simp] -- Porting note: added variant with `Equiv.pointReflection` for `simp`
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
theorem midpoint_comm (x y : P) : midpoint R x y = midpoint R y x := by
rw [midpoint, ← lineMap_apply_one_sub, one_sub_invOf_two, midpoint]
#align midpoint_comm midpoint_comm
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
#align affine_equiv.point_reflection_midpoint_right AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right
@[simp] -- Porting note: added variant with `Equiv.pointReflection` for `simp`
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
theorem midpoint_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₃ p₄ = midpoint R (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) :=
lineMap_vsub_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
#align midpoint_vsub_midpoint midpoint_vsub_midpoint
theorem midpoint_vadd_midpoint (v v' : V) (p p' : P) :
midpoint R v v' +ᵥ midpoint R p p' = midpoint R (v +ᵥ p) (v' +ᵥ p') :=
lineMap_vadd_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
#align midpoint_vadd_midpoint midpoint_vadd_midpoint
theorem midpoint_eq_iff {x y z : P} : midpoint R x y = z ↔ pointReflection R z x = y :=
eq_comm.trans
((injective_pointReflection_left_of_module R x).eq_iff'
(AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left x y)).symm
#align midpoint_eq_iff midpoint_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_left (x y : P) :
midpoint R (Equiv.pointReflection x y) y = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 <| Equiv.pointReflection_involutive _ _
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_right (x y : P) :
midpoint R y (Equiv.pointReflection x y) = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) :=
lineMap_vsub_left _ _ _
#align midpoint_vsub_left midpoint_vsub_left
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, midpoint_vsub_left]
#align midpoint_vsub_right midpoint_vsub_right
@[simp]
theorem left_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) :=
left_vsub_lineMap _ _ _
#align left_vsub_midpoint left_vsub_midpoint
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Midpoint.lean | 129 | 130 | theorem right_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by |
rw [midpoint_comm, left_vsub_midpoint]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import topology.continuous_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
#align nhds_bind_nhds_within nhds_bind_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
#align eventually_nhds_nhds_within eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align eventually_nhds_within_iff eventually_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
#align frequently_nhds_within_iff frequently_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
#align mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
#align eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
#align nhds_within_eq nhdsWithin_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align nhds_within_univ nhdsWithin_univ
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s)
(t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
#align nhds_within_has_basis nhdsWithin_hasBasis
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
#align nhds_within_basis_open nhdsWithin_basis_open
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_compl diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_diff diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
#align nhds_of_nhds_within_of_nhds nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 121 | 123 | theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by |
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import set_theory.zfc.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0b3759a8ef0bd8239ecdaa5e1089add5feebe1a"
-- Porting note: Lean 3 uses `Set` for `ZFSet`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open Function (OfArity)
inductive PSet : Type (u + 1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → PSet) : PSet
#align pSet PSet
namespace PSet
def «Type» : PSet → Type u
| ⟨α, _⟩ => α
#align pSet.type PSet.Type
def Func : ∀ x : PSet, x.Type → PSet
| ⟨_, A⟩ => A
#align pSet.func PSet.Func
@[simp]
theorem mk_type (α A) : «Type» ⟨α, A⟩ = α :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_type PSet.mk_type
@[simp]
theorem mk_func (α A) : Func ⟨α, A⟩ = A :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_func PSet.mk_func
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : PSet, mk x.Type x.Func = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.eta PSet.eta
def Equiv : PSet → PSet → Prop
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => (∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, Equiv (A a) (B b))
#align pSet.equiv PSet.Equiv
theorem equiv_iff :
∀ {x y : PSet},
Equiv x y ↔ (∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)) ∧ ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ => Iff.rfl
#align pSet.equiv_iff PSet.equiv_iff
theorem Equiv.exists_left {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).1
#align pSet.equiv.exists_left PSet.Equiv.exists_left
theorem Equiv.exists_right {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).2
#align pSet.equiv.exists_right PSet.Equiv.exists_right
@[refl]
protected theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ x, Equiv x x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩, fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.refl PSet.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Equiv.rfl {x} : Equiv x x :=
Equiv.refl x
#align pSet.equiv.rfl PSet.Equiv.rfl
protected theorem Equiv.euc : ∀ {x y z}, Equiv x y → Equiv z y → Equiv x z
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨γβ, βγ⟩ =>
⟨ fun a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.euc ab bc⟩,
fun c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.euc ba cb⟩ ⟩
#align pSet.equiv.euc PSet.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y} : Equiv x y → Equiv y x :=
(Equiv.refl y).euc
#align pSet.equiv.symm PSet.Equiv.symm
protected theorem Equiv.comm {x y} : Equiv x y ↔ Equiv y x :=
⟨Equiv.symm, Equiv.symm⟩
#align pSet.equiv.comm PSet.Equiv.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : Equiv x y) (h2 : Equiv y z) : Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.equiv.trans PSet.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_of_isEmpty (x y : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] [IsEmpty y.Type] : Equiv x y :=
equiv_iff.2 <| by simp
#align pSet.equiv_of_is_empty PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty
instance setoid : Setoid PSet :=
⟨PSet.Equiv, Equiv.refl, Equiv.symm, Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.setoid PSet.setoid
protected def Subset (x y : PSet) : Prop :=
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (x.Func a) (y.Func b)
#align pSet.subset PSet.Subset
instance : HasSubset PSet :=
⟨PSet.Subset⟩
instance : IsRefl PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
instance : IsTrans PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun x y z hxy hyz a => by
cases' hxy a with b hb
cases' hyz b with c hc
exact ⟨c, hb.trans hc⟩⟩
theorem Equiv.ext : ∀ x y : PSet, Equiv x y ↔ x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.ext PSet.Equiv.ext
theorem Subset.congr_left : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun αγ b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a
⟨c, (Equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
fun βγ a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_left PSet.Subset.congr_left
theorem Subset.congr_right : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun γα c =>
let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
fun γβ c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨a, cb.trans (Equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_right PSet.Subset.congr_right
protected def Mem (x y : PSet.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ b, Equiv x (y.Func b)
#align pSet.mem PSet.Mem
instance : Membership PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.Mem⟩
theorem Mem.mk {α : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩
#align pSet.mem.mk PSet.Mem.mk
theorem func_mem (x : PSet) (i : x.Type) : x.Func i ∈ x := by
cases x
apply Mem.mk
#align pSet.func_mem PSet.func_mem
theorem Mem.ext : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, (∀ w : PSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → Equiv x y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩, h =>
⟨fun a => (h (A a)).1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.ext PSet.Mem.ext
theorem Mem.congr_right : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_right PSet.Mem.congr_right
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : PSet.{u}} : Equiv x y ↔ ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y :=
⟨Mem.congr_right,
match x, y with
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => fun h =>
⟨fun a => h.1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv_iff_mem PSet.equiv_iff_mem
theorem Mem.congr_left : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w
| _, _, h, ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_left PSet.Mem.congr_left
private theorem mem_wf_aux : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → Acc (· ∈ ·) y
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, H =>
⟨_, by
rintro ⟨γ, C⟩ ⟨b, hc⟩
cases' H.exists_right b with a ha
have H := ha.trans hc.symm
rw [mk_func] at H
exact mem_wf_aux H⟩
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨fun x => mem_wf_aux <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.mem_wf PSet.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation PSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : PSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align pSet.mem_asymm PSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : PSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align pSet.mem_irrefl PSet.mem_irrefl
def toSet (u : PSet.{u}) : Set PSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align pSet.to_set PSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : PSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.mem_to_set PSet.mem_toSet
protected def Nonempty (u : PSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align pSet.nonempty PSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : PSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_def PSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : PSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_of_mem PSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : PSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_to_set_iff PSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
theorem nonempty_type_iff_nonempty {x : PSet} : Nonempty x.Type ↔ PSet.Nonempty x :=
⟨fun ⟨i⟩ => ⟨_, func_mem _ i⟩, fun ⟨_, j, _⟩ => ⟨j⟩⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty PSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_type (x : PSet) [h : Nonempty x.Type] : PSet.Nonempty x :=
nonempty_type_iff_nonempty.1 h
#align pSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type PSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type
theorem Equiv.eq {x y : PSet} : Equiv x y ↔ toSet x = toSet y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans Set.ext_iff.symm
#align pSet.equiv.eq PSet.Equiv.eq
instance : Coe PSet (Set PSet) :=
⟨toSet⟩
protected def empty : PSet :=
⟨_, PEmpty.elim⟩
#align pSet.empty PSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection PSet :=
⟨PSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited PSet :=
⟨∅⟩
instance : IsEmpty («Type» ∅) :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : PSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : PSet.{u}) :=
IsEmpty.exists_iff.1
#align pSet.not_mem_empty PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align pSet.to_set_empty PSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : PSet.{u}) : (∅ : PSet) ⊆ x := fun x => x.elim
#align pSet.empty_subset PSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 370 | 370 | theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬PSet.Nonempty ∅ := by | simp [PSet.Nonempty]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.Translations
#align_import algebra.continued_fractions.terminated_stable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
namespace GeneralizedContinuedFraction
variable {K : Type*} {g : GeneralizedContinuedFraction K} {n m : ℕ}
theorem terminated_stable (n_le_m : n ≤ m) (terminated_at_n : g.TerminatedAt n) :
g.TerminatedAt m :=
g.s.terminated_stable n_le_m terminated_at_n
#align generalized_continued_fraction.terminated_stable GeneralizedContinuedFraction.terminated_stable
variable [DivisionRing K]
theorem continuantsAux_stable_step_of_terminated (terminated_at_n : g.TerminatedAt n) :
g.continuantsAux (n + 2) = g.continuantsAux (n + 1) := by
rw [terminatedAt_iff_s_none] at terminated_at_n
simp only [continuantsAux, Nat.add_eq, Nat.add_zero, terminated_at_n]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.continuants_aux_stable_step_of_terminated GeneralizedContinuedFraction.continuantsAux_stable_step_of_terminated
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/TerminatedStable.lean | 37 | 42 | theorem continuantsAux_stable_of_terminated (n_lt_m : n < m) (terminated_at_n : g.TerminatedAt n) :
g.continuantsAux m = g.continuantsAux (n + 1) := by |
refine Nat.le_induction rfl (fun k hnk hk => ?_) _ n_lt_m
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hnk with ⟨k, rfl⟩
refine (continuantsAux_stable_step_of_terminated ?_).trans hk
exact terminated_stable (Nat.le_add_right _ _) terminated_at_n
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ico Set.preimage_const_mul_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Icc Set.preimage_const_mul_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_uIcc (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c : α) :
(· * a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b / a, c / a]] :=
(lt_or_gt_of_ne ha).elim
(fun h => by
simp [← Icc_min_max, h, h.le, min_div_div_right_of_nonpos, max_div_div_right_of_nonpos])
fun ha : 0 < a => by simp [← Icc_min_max, ha, ha.le, min_div_div_right, max_div_div_right]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_uIcc Set.preimage_mul_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_uIcc (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c : α) :
(a * ·) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b / a, c / a]] := by
simp only [← preimage_mul_const_uIcc ha, mul_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_uIcc Set.preimage_const_mul_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_div_const_uIcc (ha : a ≠ 0) (b c : α) :
(fun x => x / a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b * a, c * a]] := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, preimage_mul_const_uIcc (inv_ne_zero ha), inv_inv]
#align set.preimage_div_const_uIcc Set.preimage_div_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_mul_const_uIcc (a b c : α) : (· * a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b * a, c * a]] :=
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha]
else calc
(fun x => x * a) '' [[b, c]] = (· * a⁻¹) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] :=
(Units.mk0 a ha).mulRight.image_eq_preimage _
_ = (fun x => x / a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] := by simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
_ = [[b * a, c * a]] := preimage_div_const_uIcc ha _ _
#align set.image_mul_const_uIcc Set.image_mul_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_mul_uIcc (a b c : α) : (a * ·) '' [[b, c]] = [[a * b, a * c]] := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using image_mul_const_uIcc a b c
#align set.image_const_mul_uIcc Set.image_const_mul_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_div_const_uIcc (a b c : α) : (fun x => x / a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b / a, c / a]] := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, image_mul_const_uIcc]
#align set.image_div_const_uIcc Set.image_div_const_uIcc
theorem image_mul_right_Icc' (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) :=
((Units.mk0 c h.ne').mulRight.image_eq_preimage _).trans (by simp [h, division_def])
#align set.image_mul_right_Icc' Set.image_mul_right_Icc'
theorem image_mul_right_Icc {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
(fun x => x * c) '' Icc a b = Icc (a * c) (b * c) := by
cases eq_or_lt_of_le hc
· subst c
simp [(nonempty_Icc.2 hab).image_const]
exact image_mul_right_Icc' a b ‹0 < c›
#align set.image_mul_right_Icc Set.image_mul_right_Icc
theorem image_mul_left_Icc' {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b c : α) :
(a * ·) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) := by
convert image_mul_right_Icc' b c h using 1 <;> simp only [mul_comm _ a]
#align set.image_mul_left_Icc' Set.image_mul_left_Icc'
theorem image_mul_left_Icc {a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
(a * ·) '' Icc b c = Icc (a * b) (a * c) := by
convert image_mul_right_Icc hbc ha using 1 <;> simp only [mul_comm _ a]
#align set.image_mul_left_Icc Set.image_mul_left_Icc
theorem image_mul_right_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) '' Ioo a b = Ioo (a * c) (b * c) :=
((Units.mk0 c h.ne').mulRight.image_eq_preimage _).trans (by simp [h, division_def])
#align set.image_mul_right_Ioo Set.image_mul_right_Ioo
theorem image_mul_left_Ioo {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b c : α) :
(a * ·) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a * b) (a * c) := by
convert image_mul_right_Ioo b c h using 1 <;> simp only [mul_comm _ a]
#align set.image_mul_left_Ioo Set.image_mul_left_Ioo
theorem inv_Ioo_0_left {a : α} (ha : 0 < a) : (Ioo 0 a)⁻¹ = Ioi a⁻¹ := by
ext x
exact
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ (inv_lt_inv ha h.1).2 h.2, fun h =>
⟨inv_pos.2 <| (inv_pos.2 ha).trans h,
inv_inv a ▸ (inv_lt_inv ((inv_pos.2 ha).trans h) (inv_pos.2 ha)).2 h⟩⟩
#align set.inv_Ioo_0_left Set.inv_Ioo_0_left
theorem inv_Ioi {a : α} (ha : 0 < a) : (Ioi a)⁻¹ = Ioo 0 a⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, inv_Ioo_0_left (inv_pos.2 ha), inv_inv]
#align set.inv_Ioi Set.inv_Ioi
theorem image_const_mul_Ioi_zero {k : Type*} [LinearOrderedField k] {x : k} (hx : 0 < x) :
(fun y => x * y) '' Ioi (0 : k) = Ioi 0 := by
erw [(Units.mk0 x hx.ne').mulLeft.image_eq_preimage, preimage_const_mul_Ioi 0 (inv_pos.mpr hx),
zero_div]
#align set.image_const_mul_Ioi_zero Set.image_const_mul_Ioi_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 871 | 875 | theorem image_affine_Icc' {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b c d : α) :
(a * · + b) '' Icc c d = Icc (a * c + b) (a * d + b) := by |
suffices (· + b) '' ((a * ·) '' Icc c d) = Icc (a * c + b) (a * d + b) by
rwa [Set.image_image] at this
rw [image_mul_left_Icc' h, image_add_const_Icc]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Mathlib
open Lean hiding Rat mkRat
open Meta
namespace Meta.NormNum
open Qq
theorem natPow_zero : Nat.pow a (nat_lit 0) = nat_lit 1 := rfl
theorem natPow_one : Nat.pow a (nat_lit 1) = a := Nat.pow_one _
theorem zero_natPow : Nat.pow (nat_lit 0) (Nat.succ b) = nat_lit 0 := rfl
theorem one_natPow : Nat.pow (nat_lit 1) b = nat_lit 1 := Nat.one_pow _
structure IsNatPowT (p : Prop) (a b c : Nat) : Prop where
run' : p → Nat.pow a b = c
theorem IsNatPowT.run
(p : IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a (nat_lit 1) = a) a b c) : Nat.pow a b = c := p.run' (Nat.pow_one _)
theorem IsNatPowT.trans (h1 : IsNatPowT p a b c) (h2 : IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a b = c) a b' c') :
IsNatPowT p a b' c' := ⟨h2.run' ∘ h1.run'⟩
theorem IsNatPowT.bit0 : IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a b = c) a (nat_lit 2 * b) (Nat.mul c c) :=
⟨fun h1 => by simp [two_mul, pow_add, ← h1]⟩
theorem IsNatPowT.bit1 :
IsNatPowT (Nat.pow a b = c) a (nat_lit 2 * b + nat_lit 1) (Nat.mul c (Nat.mul c a)) :=
⟨fun h1 => by simp [two_mul, pow_add, mul_assoc, ← h1]⟩
partial def evalNatPow (a b : Q(ℕ)) : (c : Q(ℕ)) × Q(Nat.pow $a $b = $c) :=
if b.natLit! = 0 then
haveI : $b =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
⟨q(nat_lit 1), q(natPow_zero)⟩
else if a.natLit! = 0 then
haveI : $a =Q 0 := ⟨⟩
have b' : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b.natLit! - 1)
haveI : $b =Q Nat.succ $b' := ⟨⟩
⟨q(nat_lit 0), q(zero_natPow)⟩
else if a.natLit! = 1 then
haveI : $a =Q 1 := ⟨⟩
⟨q(nat_lit 1), q(one_natPow)⟩
else if b.natLit! = 1 then
haveI : $b =Q 1 := ⟨⟩
⟨a, q(natPow_one)⟩
else
let ⟨c, p⟩ := go b.natLit!.log2 a (mkRawNatLit 1) a b _ .rfl
⟨c, q(($p).run)⟩
where
go (depth : Nat) (a b₀ c₀ b : Q(ℕ)) (p : Q(Prop)) (hp : $p =Q (Nat.pow $a $b₀ = $c₀)) :
(c : Q(ℕ)) × Q(IsNatPowT $p $a $b $c) :=
let b' := b.natLit!
if depth ≤ 1 then
let a' := a.natLit!
let c₀' := c₀.natLit!
if b' &&& 1 == 0 then
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c₀' * c₀')
haveI : $c =Q Nat.mul $c₀ $c₀ := ⟨⟩
haveI : $b =Q 2 * $b₀ := ⟨⟩
⟨c, q(IsNatPowT.bit0)⟩
else
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c₀' * (c₀' * a'))
haveI : $c =Q Nat.mul $c₀ (Nat.mul $c₀ $a) := ⟨⟩
haveI : $b =Q 2 * $b₀ + 1 := ⟨⟩
⟨c, q(IsNatPowT.bit1)⟩
else
let d := depth >>> 1
have hi : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b' >>> d)
let ⟨c1, p1⟩ := go (depth - d) a b₀ c₀ hi p (by exact hp)
let ⟨c2, p2⟩ := go d a hi c1 b q(Nat.pow $a $hi = $c1) ⟨⟩
⟨c2, q(($p1).trans $p2)⟩
theorem intPow_ofNat (h1 : Nat.pow a b = c) :
Int.pow (Int.ofNat a) b = Int.ofNat c := by simp [← h1]
theorem intPow_negOfNat_bit0 (h1 : Nat.pow a b' = c')
(hb : nat_lit 2 * b' = b) (hc : c' * c' = c) :
Int.pow (Int.negOfNat a) b = Int.ofNat c := by
rw [← hb, Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.pow_eq, pow_mul, neg_pow_two, ← pow_mul, two_mul, pow_add, ← hc,
← h1]
simp
theorem intPow_negOfNat_bit1 (h1 : Nat.pow a b' = c')
(hb : nat_lit 2 * b' + nat_lit 1 = b) (hc : c' * (c' * a) = c) :
Int.pow (Int.negOfNat a) b = Int.negOfNat c := by
rw [← hb, Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.negOfNat_eq, Int.pow_eq, pow_succ, pow_mul, neg_pow_two, ← pow_mul,
two_mul, pow_add, ← hc, ← h1]
simp [mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]
partial def evalIntPow (za : ℤ) (a : Q(ℤ)) (b : Q(ℕ)) : ℤ × (c : Q(ℤ)) × Q(Int.pow $a $b = $c) :=
have a' : Q(ℕ) := a.appArg!
if 0 ≤ za then
haveI : $a =Q .ofNat $a' := ⟨⟩
let ⟨c, p⟩ := evalNatPow a' b
⟨c.natLit!, q(.ofNat $c), q(intPow_ofNat $p)⟩
else
haveI : $a =Q .negOfNat $a' := ⟨⟩
let b' := b.natLit!
have b₀ : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (b' >>> 1)
let ⟨c₀, p⟩ := evalNatPow a' b₀
let c' := c₀.natLit!
if b' &&& 1 == 0 then
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c' * c')
have pc : Q($c₀ * $c₀ = $c) := (q(Eq.refl $c) : Expr)
have pb : Q(2 * $b₀ = $b) := (q(Eq.refl $b) : Expr)
⟨c.natLit!, q(.ofNat $c), q(intPow_negOfNat_bit0 $p $pb $pc)⟩
else
have c : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit (c' * (c' * a'.natLit!))
have pc : Q($c₀ * ($c₀ * $a') = $c) := (q(Eq.refl $c) : Expr)
have pb : Q(2 * $b₀ + 1 = $b) := (q(Eq.refl $b) : Expr)
⟨-c.natLit!, q(.negOfNat $c), q(intPow_negOfNat_bit1 $p $pb $pc)⟩
-- see note [norm_num lemma function equality]
theorem isNat_pow {α} [Semiring α] : ∀ {f : α → ℕ → α} {a : α} {b a' b' c : ℕ},
f = HPow.hPow → IsNat a a' → IsNat b b' → Nat.pow a' b' = c → IsNat (f a b) c
| _, _, _, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => ⟨by simp⟩
-- see note [norm_num lemma function equality]
theorem isInt_pow {α} [Ring α] : ∀ {f : α → ℕ → α} {a : α} {b : ℕ} {a' : ℤ} {b' : ℕ} {c : ℤ},
f = HPow.hPow → IsInt a a' → IsNat b b' → Int.pow a' b' = c → IsInt (f a b) c
| _, _, _, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨rfl⟩, ⟨rfl⟩, rfl => ⟨by simp⟩
-- see note [norm_num lemma function equality]
theorem isRat_pow {α} [Ring α] {f : α → ℕ → α} {a : α} {an cn : ℤ} {ad b b' cd : ℕ} :
f = HPow.hPow → IsRat a an ad → IsNat b b' →
Int.pow an b' = cn → Nat.pow ad b' = cd →
IsRat (f a b) cn cd := by
rintro rfl ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨rfl⟩ (rfl : an ^ b = _) (rfl : ad ^ b = _)
have := invertiblePow (ad:α) b
rw [← Nat.cast_pow] at this
use this; simp [invOf_pow, Commute.mul_pow]
@[norm_num (_ : α) ^ (_ : ℕ)]
def evalPow : NormNumExt where eval {u α} e := do
let .app (.app (f : Q($α → ℕ → $α)) (a : Q($α))) (b : Q(ℕ)) ← whnfR e | failure
let ⟨nb, pb⟩ ← deriveNat b q(instAddMonoidWithOneNat)
let sα ← inferSemiring α
let ra ← derive a
guard <|← withDefault <| withNewMCtxDepth <| isDefEq f q(HPow.hPow (α := $α))
haveI' : $e =Q $a ^ $b := ⟨⟩
haveI' : $f =Q HPow.hPow := ⟨⟩
let rec
core : Option (Result e) := do
match ra with
| .isBool .. => failure
| .isNat sα na pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
have ⟨c, r⟩ := evalNatPow na nb
return .isNat sα c q(isNat_pow (f := $f) (.refl $f) $pa $pb $r)
| .isNegNat rα .. =>
assumeInstancesCommute
let ⟨za, na, pa⟩ ← ra.toInt rα
have ⟨zc, c, r⟩ := evalIntPow za na nb
return .isInt rα c zc q(isInt_pow (f := $f) (.refl $f) $pa $pb $r)
| .isRat dα qa na da pa =>
assumeInstancesCommute
have ⟨zc, nc, r1⟩ := evalIntPow qa.num na nb
have ⟨dc, r2⟩ := evalNatPow da nb
let qc := mkRat zc dc.natLit!
return .isRat' dα qc nc dc q(isRat_pow (f := $f) (.refl $f) $pa $pb $r1 $r2)
core
theorem isNat_zpow_pos {α : Type*} [DivisionSemiring α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsNat b nb) (pe' : IsNat (a ^ nb) ne) :
IsNat (a ^ b) ne := by
rwa [pb.out, zpow_natCast]
theorem isNat_zpow_neg {α : Type*} [DivisionSemiring α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsInt b (Int.negOfNat nb)) (pe' : IsNat (a ^ nb)⁻¹ ne) :
IsNat (a ^ b) ne := by
rwa [pb.out, Int.cast_negOfNat, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
theorem isInt_zpow_pos {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsNat b nb) (pe' : IsInt (a ^ nb) (Int.negOfNat ne)) :
IsInt (a ^ b) (Int.negOfNat ne) := by
rwa [pb.out, zpow_natCast]
theorem isInt_zpow_neg {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb ne : ℕ}
(pb : IsInt b (Int.negOfNat nb)) (pe' : IsInt (a ^ nb)⁻¹ (Int.negOfNat ne)) :
IsInt (a ^ b) (Int.negOfNat ne) := by
rwa [pb.out, Int.cast_negOfNat, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/Pow.lean | 216 | 220 | theorem isRat_zpow_pos {α : Type*} [DivisionRing α] {a : α} {b : ℤ} {nb : ℕ}
{num : ℤ} {den : ℕ}
(pb : IsNat b nb) (pe' : IsRat (a^nb) num den) :
IsRat (a^b) num den := by |
rwa [pb.out, zpow_natCast]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
#align emetric.inf_edist EMetric.infEdist
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align emetric.inf_edist_empty EMetric.infEdist_empty
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
#align emetric.le_inf_edist EMetric.le_infEdist
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
#align emetric.inf_edist_union EMetric.infEdist_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
#align emetric.inf_edist_Union EMetric.infEdist_iUnion
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
#align emetric.inf_edist_singleton EMetric.infEdist_singleton
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
#align emetric.inf_edist_zero_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_zero_of_mem
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
#align emetric.inf_edist_anti EMetric.infEdist_anti
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align emetric.inf_edist_lt_iff EMetric.infEdist_lt_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 126 | 130 | theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun z _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by | simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Dual
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {R I J X Y : Set α}
section restrict
@[simps] def restrictIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := R
Indep I := M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ R
indep_empty := ⟨M.empty_indep, empty_subset _⟩
indep_subset := fun I J h hIJ ↦ ⟨h.1.subset hIJ, hIJ.trans h.2⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I I' ⟨hI, hIY⟩ (hIn : ¬ M.Basis' I R) (hI' : M.Basis' I' R)
rw [basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground] at hIn hI'
obtain ⟨B', hB', rfl⟩ := hI'.exists_base
obtain ⟨B, hB, hIB, hBIB'⟩ := hI.exists_base_subset_union_base hB'
rw [hB'.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual, diff_inter_diff] at hI'
have hss : M.E \ (B' ∪ (R ∩ M.E)) ⊆ M.E \ (B ∪ (R ∩ M.E)) := by
apply diff_subset_diff_right
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left subset_union_right, union_comm]
exact hBIB'.trans (union_subset_union_left _ (subset_inter hIY hI.subset_ground))
have hi : M✶.Indep (M.E \ (B ∪ (R ∩ M.E))) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists]
exact ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_right subset_union_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
have h_eq := hI'.eq_of_subset_indep hi hss
(diff_subset_diff_right subset_union_right)
rw [h_eq, ← diff_inter_diff, ← hB.inter_basis_iff_compl_inter_basis_dual] at hI'
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.subset_basis_of_subset
(subset_inter hIB (subset_inter hIY hI.subset_ground))
obtain rfl := hI'.indep.eq_of_basis hJ
have hIJ' : I ⊂ B ∩ (R ∩ M.E) := hIJ.ssubset_of_ne (fun he ↦ hIn (by rwa [he]))
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hIJ'
exact ⟨e, ⟨⟨(hBIB' he.1.1).elim (fun h ↦ (he.2 h).elim) id,he.1.2⟩, he.2⟩,
hI'.indep.subset (insert_subset he.1 hIJ), insert_subset he.1.2.1 hIY⟩
indep_maximal := by
rintro A hAX I ⟨hI, _⟩ hIA
obtain ⟨J, hJ, hIJ⟩ := hI.subset_basis'_of_subset hIA; use J
rw [mem_maximals_setOf_iff, and_iff_left hJ.subset, and_iff_left hIJ,
and_iff_right ⟨hJ.indep, hJ.subset.trans hAX⟩]
exact fun K ⟨⟨hK, _⟩, _, hKA⟩ hJK ↦ hJ.eq_of_subset_indep hK hJK hKA
subset_ground I := And.right
def restrict (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : Matroid α := (M.restrictIndepMatroid R).matroid
scoped infixl:65 " ↾ " => Matroid.restrict
@[simp] theorem restrict_indep_iff : (M ↾ R).Indep I ↔ M.Indep I ∧ I ⊆ R := Iff.rfl
theorem Indep.indep_restrict_of_subset (h : M.Indep I) (hIR : I ⊆ R) : (M ↾ R).Indep I :=
restrict_indep_iff.mpr ⟨h,hIR⟩
theorem Indep.of_restrict (hI : (M ↾ R).Indep I) : M.Indep I :=
(restrict_indep_iff.1 hI).1
@[simp] theorem restrict_ground_eq : (M ↾ R).E = R := rfl
theorem restrict_finite {R : Set α} (hR : R.Finite) : (M ↾ R).Finite :=
⟨hR⟩
@[simp] theorem restrict_dep_iff : (M ↾ R).Dep X ↔ ¬ M.Indep X ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [Dep, restrict_indep_iff, restrict_ground_eq]; tauto
@[simp] theorem restrict_ground_eq_self (M : Matroid α) : (M ↾ M.E) = M := by
refine eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl ?_; aesop
theorem restrict_restrict_eq {R₁ R₂ : Set α} (M : Matroid α) (hR : R₂ ⊆ R₁) :
(M ↾ R₁) ↾ R₂ = M ↾ R₂ := by
refine eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl ?_
simp only [restrict_ground_eq, restrict_indep_iff, and_congr_left_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ h _ _ ↦ h.trans hR
@[simp] theorem restrict_idem (M : Matroid α) (R : Set α) : M ↾ R ↾ R = M ↾ R := by
rw [M.restrict_restrict_eq Subset.rfl]
@[simp] theorem base_restrict_iff (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
(M ↾ X).Base I ↔ M.Basis I X := by
simp_rw [base_iff_maximal_indep, basis_iff', restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hX, and_assoc]
aesop
theorem base_restrict_iff' : (M ↾ X).Base I ↔ M.Basis' I X := by
simp_rw [Basis', base_iff_maximal_indep, mem_maximals_setOf_iff, restrict_indep_iff]
theorem Basis.restrict_base (h : M.Basis I X) : (M ↾ X).Base I := by
rw [basis_iff'] at h
simp_rw [base_iff_maximal_indep, restrict_indep_iff, and_imp, and_assoc, and_iff_right h.1.1,
and_iff_right h.1.2.1]
exact fun J hJ hJX hIJ ↦ h.1.2.2 _ hJ hIJ hJX
instance restrict_finiteRk [M.FiniteRk] (R : Set α) : (M ↾ R).FiniteRk :=
let ⟨_, hB⟩ := (M ↾ R).exists_base
hB.finiteRk_of_finite (hB.indep.of_restrict.finite)
instance restrict_finitary [Finitary M] (R : Set α) : Finitary (M ↾ R) := by
refine ⟨fun I hI ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [restrict_indep_iff] at *
rw [indep_iff_forall_finite_subset_indep]
exact ⟨fun J hJ hJfin ↦ (hI J hJ hJfin).1,
fun e heI ↦ singleton_subset_iff.1 (hI _ (by simpa) (toFinite _)).2⟩
@[simp] theorem Basis.base_restrict (h : M.Basis I X) : (M ↾ X).Base I :=
(base_restrict_iff h.subset_ground).mpr h
theorem Basis.basis_restrict_of_subset (hI : M.Basis I X) (hXY : X ⊆ Y) : (M ↾ Y).Basis I X := by
rwa [← base_restrict_iff, M.restrict_restrict_eq hXY, base_restrict_iff]
theorem basis'_restrict_iff : (M ↾ R).Basis' I X ↔ M.Basis' I (X ∩ R) ∧ I ⊆ R := by
simp_rw [Basis', mem_maximals_setOf_iff, restrict_indep_iff, subset_inter_iff, and_imp]; tauto
theorem basis_restrict_iff' : (M ↾ R).Basis I X ↔ M.Basis I (X ∩ M.E) ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [basis_iff_basis'_subset_ground, basis'_restrict_iff, restrict_ground_eq, and_congr_left_iff,
← basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground]
intro hXR
rw [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hXR, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h ↦ h.subset.trans hXR
theorem basis_restrict_iff (hR : R ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
(M ↾ R).Basis I X ↔ M.Basis I X ∧ X ⊆ R := by
rw [basis_restrict_iff', and_congr_left_iff]
intro hXR
rw [← basis'_iff_basis_inter_ground, basis'_iff_basis]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Restrict.lean | 198 | 203 | theorem restrict_eq_restrict_iff (M M' : Matroid α) (X : Set α) :
M ↾ X = M' ↾ X ↔ ∀ I, I ⊆ X → (M.Indep I ↔ M'.Indep I) := by |
refine ⟨fun h I hIX ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ eq_of_indep_iff_indep_forall rfl fun I (hI : I ⊆ X) ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← and_iff_left (a := (M.Indep I)) hIX, ← and_iff_left (a := (M'.Indep I)) hIX,
← restrict_indep_iff, h, restrict_indep_iff]
rw [restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hI, restrict_indep_iff, and_iff_left hI, h _ hI]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.function.l2_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"83a66c8775fa14ee5180c85cab98e970956401ad"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {α F : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem Memℒp.integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (h : Memℒp f 2 μ) : Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by
simpa [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] using h.norm_rpow two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_sq MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_sq
theorem memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm {f : α → F} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Memℒp f 2 μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ 2) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
convert (memℒp_norm_rpow_iff hf two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top).symm
· simp
· rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm MeasureTheory.memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm
theorem memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Memℒp f 2 μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by
convert memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm hf using 3
simp
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq MeasureTheory.memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq
end
namespace L2
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
theorem snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top (f : Lp F 2 μ) : snorm (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)) 1 μ < ∞ := by
have h_two : ENNReal.ofReal (2 : ℝ) = 2 := by simp [zero_le_one]
rw [snorm_norm_rpow f zero_lt_two, one_mul, h_two]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg zero_le_two (Lp.snorm_ne_top f)
#align measure_theory.L2.snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top MeasureTheory.L2.snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top
theorem snorm_inner_lt_top (f g : α →₂[μ] E) : snorm (fun x : α => ⟪f x, g x⟫) 1 μ < ∞ := by
have h : ∀ x, ‖⟪f x, g x⟫‖ ≤ ‖‖f x‖ ^ (2 : ℝ) + ‖g x‖ ^ (2 : ℝ)‖ := by
intro x
rw [← @Nat.cast_two ℝ, Real.rpow_natCast, Real.rpow_natCast]
calc
‖⟪f x, g x⟫‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ * ‖g x‖ := norm_inner_le_norm _ _
_ ≤ 2 * ‖f x‖ * ‖g x‖ :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_mul_of_one_le_left (norm_nonneg _) one_le_two)
(norm_nonneg _))
-- TODO(kmill): the type ascription is getting around an elaboration error
_ ≤ ‖(‖f x‖ ^ 2 + ‖g x‖ ^ 2 : ℝ)‖ := (two_mul_le_add_sq _ _).trans (le_abs_self _)
refine (snorm_mono_ae (ae_of_all _ h)).trans_lt ((snorm_add_le ?_ ?_ le_rfl).trans_lt ?_)
· exact ((Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
· exact ((Lp.aestronglyMeasurable g).norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
rw [ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top f, snorm_rpow_two_norm_lt_top g⟩
#align measure_theory.L2.snorm_inner_lt_top MeasureTheory.L2.snorm_inner_lt_top
section InnerProductSpace
open scoped ComplexConjugate
instance : Inner 𝕜 (α →₂[μ] E) :=
⟨fun f g => ∫ a, ⟪f a, g a⟫ ∂μ⟩
theorem inner_def (f g : α →₂[μ] E) : ⟪f, g⟫ = ∫ a : α, ⟪f a, g a⟫ ∂μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.L2.inner_def MeasureTheory.L2.inner_def
theorem integral_inner_eq_sq_snorm (f : α →₂[μ] E) :
∫ a, ⟪f a, f a⟫ ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (2 : ℝ) ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K]
norm_cast
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
rotate_left
· exact Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x => sq_nonneg _
· exact ((Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).norm.aemeasurable.pow_const _).aestronglyMeasurable
congr
ext1 x
have h_two : (2 : ℝ) = ((2 : ℕ) : ℝ) := by simp
rw [← Real.rpow_natCast _ 2, ← h_two, ←
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) zero_le_two, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.L2.integral_inner_eq_sq_snorm MeasureTheory.L2.integral_inner_eq_sq_snorm
private theorem norm_sq_eq_inner' (f : α →₂[μ] E) : ‖f‖ ^ 2 = RCLike.re ⟪f, f⟫ := by
have h_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = 2 := by simp
rw [inner_def, integral_inner_eq_sq_snorm, norm_def, ← ENNReal.toReal_pow, RCLike.ofReal_re,
ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal (ENNReal.pow_ne_top (Lp.snorm_ne_top f)) _]
· rw [← ENNReal.rpow_natCast, snorm_eq_snorm' two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top, snorm', ←
ENNReal.rpow_mul, one_div, h_two]
simp
· refine (lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top zero_lt_two ?_).ne
rw [← h_two, ← snorm_eq_snorm' two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top]
exact Lp.snorm_lt_top f
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L2Space.lean | 181 | 185 | theorem mem_L1_inner (f g : α →₂[μ] E) :
AEEqFun.mk (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫)
((Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).inner (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable g)) ∈
Lp 𝕜 1 μ := by |
simp_rw [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, snorm_aeeqFun]; exact snorm_inner_lt_top f g
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate
open Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
#align nnreal.rpow NNReal.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_pow NNReal.rpow_eq_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_rpow NNReal.coe_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
#align nnreal.rpow_zero NNReal.rpow_zero
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff NNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
#align nnreal.zero_rpow NNReal.zero_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
#align nnreal.rpow_one NNReal.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
#align nnreal.one_rpow NNReal.one_rpow
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
#align nnreal.rpow_add NNReal.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_add' NNReal.rpow_add'
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
#align nnreal.rpow_mul NNReal.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
#align nnreal.rpow_neg NNReal.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
#align nnreal.rpow_neg_one NNReal.rpow_neg_one
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
#align nnreal.rpow_sub NNReal.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_sub' NNReal.rpow_sub'
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_inv_rpow_self NNReal.rpow_inv_rpow_self
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_self_rpow_inv NNReal.rpow_self_rpow_inv
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
#align nnreal.inv_rpow NNReal.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
#align nnreal.div_rpow NNReal.div_rpow
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
#align nnreal.sqrt_eq_rpow NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
#align nnreal.rpow_nat_cast NNReal.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
#align nnreal.rpow_two NNReal.rpow_two
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
#align nnreal.mul_rpow NNReal.mul_rpow
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow NNReal.rpow_le_rpow
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_iff NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_iff NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff
theorem le_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
#align nnreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff NNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff
theorem rpow_one_div_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ (1 / z) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
#align nnreal.rpow_one_div_le_iff NNReal.rpow_one_div_le_iff
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
#align nnreal.rpow_pos NNReal.rpow_pos
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_one NNReal.rpow_lt_one
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_one NNReal.rpow_le_one
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg NNReal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos NNReal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
#align nnreal.one_lt_rpow NNReal.one_lt_rpow
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
#align nnreal.one_le_rpow NNReal.one_le_rpow
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
#align nnreal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg NNReal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
#align nnreal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos NNReal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
#align nnreal.rpow_le_self_of_le_one NNReal.rpow_le_self_of_le_one
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_left_injective NNReal.rpow_left_injective
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_rpow_iff NNReal.rpow_eq_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, _root_.inv_mul_cancel hx, rpow_one]⟩
#align nnreal.rpow_left_surjective NNReal.rpow_left_surjective
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
#align nnreal.rpow_left_bijective NNReal.rpow_left_bijective
theorem eq_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
#align nnreal.eq_rpow_one_div_iff NNReal.eq_rpow_one_div_iff
theorem rpow_one_div_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 / z) = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
#align nnreal.rpow_one_div_eq_iff NNReal.rpow_one_div_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
#align nnreal.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv NNReal.pow_rpow_inv_natCast
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
#align nnreal.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat NNReal.rpow_inv_natCast_pow
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 349 | 352 | theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by |
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
#align_import data.nat.factorization.prime_pow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
variable {R : Type*} [CommMonoidWithZero R] (n p : R) (k : ℕ)
theorem IsPrimePow.minFac_pow_factorization_eq {n : ℕ} (hn : IsPrimePow n) :
n.minFac ^ n.factorization n.minFac = n := by
obtain ⟨p, k, hp, hk, rfl⟩ := hn
rw [← Nat.prime_iff] at hp
rw [hp.pow_minFac hk.ne', hp.factorization_pow, Finsupp.single_eq_same]
#align is_prime_pow.min_fac_pow_factorization_eq IsPrimePow.minFac_pow_factorization_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/PrimePow.lean | 27 | 33 | theorem isPrimePow_of_minFac_pow_factorization_eq {n : ℕ}
(h : n.minFac ^ n.factorization n.minFac = n) (hn : n ≠ 1) : IsPrimePow n := by |
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn')
· simp_all
refine ⟨_, _, (Nat.minFac_prime hn).prime, ?_, h⟩
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.support_factorization, hn',
Nat.minFac_prime hn, Nat.minFac_dvd]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import data.part from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"80c43012d26f63026d362c3aba28f3c3bafb07e6"
open Function
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
Dom : Prop
get : Dom → α
#align part Part
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
#align part.to_option Part.toOption
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_some Part.toOption_isSome
@[simp] lemma toOption_isNone (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isNone ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_none Part.toOption_isNone
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
#align part.ext' Part.ext'
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align part.eta Part.eta
protected def Mem (a : α) (o : Part α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
#align part.mem Part.Mem
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
#align part.mem_eq Part.mem_eq
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
#align part.dom_iff_mem Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.get_mem Part.get_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.mem_mk_iff Part.mem_mk_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
#align part.ext Part.ext
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
#align part.none Part.none
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
#align part.not_mem_none Part.not_mem_none
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
#align part.some Part.some
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
#align part.some_dom Part.some_dom
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
#align part.mem_unique Part.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align part.mem.left_unique Part.Mem.left_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
#align part.get_eq_of_mem Part.get_eq_of_mem
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
#align part.subsingleton Part.subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
#align part.get_some Part.get_some
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_some Part.mem_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
#align part.mem_some_iff Part.mem_some_iff
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align part.eq_some_iff Part.eq_some_iff
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff Part.eq_none_iff
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff' Part.eq_none_iff'
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
#align part.not_none_dom Part.not_none_dom
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
#align part.some_ne_none Part.some_ne_none
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
#align part.none_ne_some Part.none_ne_some
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
#align part.ne_none_iff Part.ne_none_iff
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
#align part.eq_none_or_eq_some Part.eq_none_or_eq_some
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
#align part.some_injective Part.some_injective
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
#align part.some_inj Part.some_inj
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
#align part.some_get Part.some_get
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_eq_some Part.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
#align part.get_eq_get_of_eq Part.get_eq_get_of_eq
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_mem Part.get_eq_iff_mem
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
#align part.eq_get_iff_mem Part.eq_get_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
#align part.none_to_option Part.none_toOption
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
#align part.some_to_option Part.some_toOption
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
#align part.none_decidable Part.noneDecidable
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
#align part.some_decidable Part.someDecidable
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
#align part.get_or_else Part.getOrElse
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.get_or_else_of_dom Part.getOrElse_of_dom
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
#align part.get_or_else_of_not_dom Part.getOrElse_of_not_dom
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
#align part.get_or_else_none Part.getOrElse_none
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
#align part.get_or_else_some Part.getOrElse_some
-- Porting note: removed `simp`
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
#align part.mem_to_option Part.mem_toOption
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem, like `mem_toOption` but with LHS in `simp` normal form
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.dom.to_option Part.Dom.toOption
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
#align part.to_option_eq_none_iff Part.toOption_eq_none_iff
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
#align part.elim_to_option Part.elim_toOption
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
#align part.of_option Part.ofOption
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
#align part.mem_of_option Part.mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
#align part.of_option_dom Part.ofOption_dom
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
#align part.of_option_eq_get Part.ofOption_eq_get
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
#align part.mem_coe Part.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
#align part.coe_none Part.coe_none
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.coe_some Part.coe_some
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
#align part.induction_on Part.induction_on
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
#align part.of_option_decidable Part.ofOptionDecidable
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
#align part.to_of_option Part.to_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
#align part.of_to_option Part.of_toOption
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
#align part.equiv_option Part.equivOption
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl x y := id
le_trans x y z f g i := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm x y f g := Part.ext fun z => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
#align part.le_total_of_le_of_le Part.le_total_of_le_of_le
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
#align part.assert Part.assert
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
#align part.bind Part.bind
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
#align part.map Part.map
#align part.map_dom Part.map_Dom
#align part.map_get Part.map_get
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_map Part.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
#align part.mem_map_iff Part.mem_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.map_none Part.map_none
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
#align part.map_some Part.map_some
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_assert Part.mem_assert
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
#align part.mem_assert_iff Part.mem_assert_iff
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· aesop
#align part.assert_pos Part.assert_pos
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
#align part.assert_neg Part.assert_neg
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_bind Part.mem_bind
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
#align part.mem_bind_iff Part.mem_bind_iff
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
#align part.dom.bind Part.Dom.bind
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
#align part.dom.of_bind Part.Dom.of_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.bind_none Part.bind_none
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
#align part.bind_some Part.bind_some
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
#align part.bind_of_mem Part.bind_of_mem
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
#align part.bind_some_eq_map Part.bind_some_eq_map
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
#align part.bind_to_option Part.bind_toOption
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
#align part.bind_assoc Part.bind_assoc
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
#align part.bind_map Part.bind_map
@[simp]
theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
#align part.map_bind Part.map_bind
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o := by
erw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_map, bind_some_eq_map]
#align part.map_map Part.map_map
instance : Monad Part where
pure := @some
map := @map
bind := @Part.bind
instance : LawfulMonad
Part where
bind_pure_comp := @bind_some_eq_map
id_map f := by cases f; rfl
pure_bind := @bind_some
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc
map_const := by simp [Functor.mapConst, Functor.map]
--Porting TODO : In Lean3 these were automatic by a tactic
seqLeft_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
seqRight_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
pure_seq x y := ext'
(by simp [Seq.seq, Part.bind, assert, (· <$> ·), pure])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
bind_map x y := ext'
(by simp [(· >>= ·), Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, get, (· <$> ·)] )
(fun _ _ => rfl)
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ x : α, f x = x) (o) : map f o = o := by
rw [show f = id from funext H]; exact id_map o
#align part.map_id' Part.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem bind_some_right (x : Part α) : x.bind some = x := by
erw [bind_some_eq_map]; simp [map_id']
#align part.bind_some_right Part.bind_some_right
@[simp]
theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a :=
rfl
#align part.pure_eq_some Part.pure_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : (return a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.ret_eq_some Part.ret_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : f <$> o = map f o :=
rfl
#align part.map_eq_map Part.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : f >>= g = f.bind g :=
rfl
#align part.bind_eq_bind Part.bind_eq_bind
theorem bind_le {α} (x : Part α) (f : α → Part β) (y : Part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· intro a h' b
have h := h b
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp] at h
apply h _ h'
· intro b h'
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨a, h₀, h₁⟩
apply h _ h₀ _ h₁
#align part.bind_le Part.bind_le
-- Porting note: No MonadFail in Lean4 yet
-- instance : MonadFail Part :=
-- { Part.monad with fail := fun _ _ => none }
def restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (H : p → o.Dom) : Part α :=
⟨p, fun h => o.get (H h)⟩
#align part.restrict Part.restrict
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (h : p → o.Dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o := by
dsimp [restrict, mem_eq]; constructor
· rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
rintro ⟨h₀, _, h₂⟩; exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
#align part.mem_restrict Part.mem_restrict
unsafe def unwrap (o : Part α) : α :=
o.get lcProof
#align part.unwrap Part.unwrap
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ h : p, (f h).Dom → (assert p f).Dom :=
Exists.intro
#align part.assert_defined Part.assert_defined
theorem bind_defined {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} :
∀ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom → (f.bind g).Dom :=
assert_defined
#align part.bind_defined Part.bind_defined
@[simp]
theorem bind_dom {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : (f.bind g).Dom ↔ ∃ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.bind_dom Part.bind_dom
section Instances
@[to_additive]
instance [One α] : One (Part α) where one := pure 1
@[to_additive]
instance [Mul α] : Mul (Part α) where mul a b := (· * ·) <$> a <*> b
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] : Inv (Part α) where inv := map Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
instance [Div α] : Div (Part α) where div a b := (· / ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Mod α] : Mod (Part α) where mod a b := (· % ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Append α] : Append (Part α) where append a b := (· ++ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Inter α] : Inter (Part α) where inter a b := (· ∩ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Union α] : Union (Part α) where union a b := (· ∪ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [SDiff α] : SDiff (Part α) where sdiff a b := (· \ ·) <$> a <*> b
section
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorems to unfold definitions
theorem mul_def [Mul α] (a b : Part α) : a * b = bind a fun y ↦ map (y * ·) b := rfl
theorem one_def [One α] : (1 : Part α) = some 1 := rfl
theorem inv_def [Inv α] (a : Part α) : a⁻¹ = Part.map (· ⁻¹) a := rfl
theorem div_def [Div α] (a b : Part α) : a / b = bind a fun y => map (y / ·) b := rfl
theorem mod_def [Mod α] (a b : Part α) : a % b = bind a fun y => map (y % ·) b := rfl
theorem append_def [Append α] (a b : Part α) : a ++ b = bind a fun y => map (y ++ ·) b := rfl
theorem inter_def [Inter α] (a b : Part α) : a ∩ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∩ ·) b := rfl
theorem union_def [Union α] (a b : Part α) : a ∪ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∪ ·) b := rfl
theorem sdiff_def [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) : a \ b = bind a fun y => map (y \ ·) b := rfl
end
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one [One α] : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Part α) :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.one_mem_one Part.one_mem_one
#align part.zero_mem_zero Part.zero_mem_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma * mb ∈ a * b := ⟨⟨ha.1, hb.1⟩, by simp only [← ha.2, ← hb.2]; rfl⟩
#align part.mul_mem_mul Part.mul_mem_mul
#align part.add_mem_add Part.add_mem_add
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_mul_dom Part.left_dom_of_mul_dom
#align part.left_dom_of_add_dom Part.left_dom_of_add_dom
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_mul_dom Part.right_dom_of_mul_dom
#align part.right_dom_of_add_dom Part.right_dom_of_add_dom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_get_eq [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a * b)) :
(a * b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mul_dom hab) * b.get (right_dom_of_mul_dom hab) := rfl
#align part.mul_get_eq Part.mul_get_eq
#align part.add_get_eq Part.add_get_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem some_mul_some [Mul α] (a b : α) : some a * some b = some (a * b) := by simp [mul_def]
#align part.some_mul_some Part.some_mul_some
#align part.some_add_some Part.some_add_some
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv [Inv α] (a : Part α) (ma : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) : ma⁻¹ ∈ a⁻¹ := by
simp [inv_def]; aesop
#align part.inv_mem_inv Part.inv_mem_inv
#align part.neg_mem_neg Part.neg_mem_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_some [Inv α] (a : α) : (some a)⁻¹ = some a⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align part.inv_some Part.inv_some
#align part.neg_some Part.neg_some
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div [Div α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma / mb ∈ a / b := by simp [div_def]; aesop
#align part.div_mem_div Part.div_mem_div
#align part.sub_mem_sub Part.sub_mem_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_div_dom Part.left_dom_of_div_dom
#align part.left_dom_of_sub_dom Part.left_dom_of_sub_dom
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_div_dom Part.right_dom_of_div_dom
#align part.right_dom_of_sub_dom Part.right_dom_of_sub_dom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_get_eq [Div α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a / b)) :
(a / b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_div_dom hab) / b.get (right_dom_of_div_dom hab) := by
simp [div_def]; aesop
#align part.div_get_eq Part.div_get_eq
#align part.sub_get_eq Part.sub_get_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem some_div_some [Div α] (a b : α) : some a / some b = some (a / b) := by simp [div_def]
#align part.some_div_some Part.some_div_some
#align part.some_sub_some Part.some_sub_some
theorem mod_mem_mod [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma % mb ∈ a % b := by simp [mod_def]; aesop
#align part.mod_mem_mod Part.mod_mem_mod
theorem left_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_mod_dom Part.left_dom_of_mod_dom
theorem right_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_mod_dom Part.right_dom_of_mod_dom
@[simp]
theorem mod_get_eq [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a % b)) :
(a % b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mod_dom hab) % b.get (right_dom_of_mod_dom hab) := by
simp [mod_def]; aesop
#align part.mod_get_eq Part.mod_get_eq
theorem some_mod_some [Mod α] (a b : α) : some a % some b = some (a % b) := by simp [mod_def]
#align part.some_mod_some Part.some_mod_some
theorem append_mem_append [Append α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ++ mb ∈ a ++ b := by simp [append_def]; aesop
#align part.append_mem_append Part.append_mem_append
theorem left_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_append_dom Part.left_dom_of_append_dom
theorem right_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_append_dom Part.right_dom_of_append_dom
@[simp]
theorem append_get_eq [Append α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : (a ++ b).get hab =
a.get (left_dom_of_append_dom hab) ++ b.get (right_dom_of_append_dom hab) := by
simp [append_def]; aesop
#align part.append_get_eq Part.append_get_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 819 | 820 | theorem some_append_some [Append α] (a b : α) : some a ++ some b = some (a ++ b) := by |
simp [append_def]
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.GaussSum
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.quadratic_reciprocity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
open Nat
section Values
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
open ZMod
section Reciprocity
variable {p q : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] [Fact q.Prime]
namespace legendreSym
open ZMod
theorem quadratic_reciprocity (hp : p ≠ 2) (hq : q ≠ 2) (hpq : p ≠ q) :
legendreSym q p * legendreSym p q = (-1) ^ (p / 2 * (q / 2)) := by
have hp₁ := (Prime.eq_two_or_odd <| @Fact.out p.Prime _).resolve_left hp
have hq₁ := (Prime.eq_two_or_odd <| @Fact.out q.Prime _).resolve_left hq
have hq₂ : ringChar (ZMod q) ≠ 2 := (ringChar_zmod_n q).substr hq
have h :=
quadraticChar_odd_prime ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp) hq ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hpq)
rw [card p] at h
have nc : ∀ n r : ℕ, ((n : ℤ) : ZMod r) = n := fun n r => by norm_cast
have nc' : (((-1) ^ (p / 2) : ℤ) : ZMod q) = (-1) ^ (p / 2) := by norm_cast
rw [legendreSym, legendreSym, nc, nc, h, map_mul, mul_rotate', mul_comm (p / 2), ← pow_two,
quadraticChar_sq_one (prime_ne_zero q p hpq.symm), mul_one, pow_mul, χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow hp₁, nc',
map_pow, quadraticChar_neg_one hq₂, card q, χ₄_eq_neg_one_pow hq₁]
#align legendre_sym.quadratic_reciprocity legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity
theorem quadratic_reciprocity' (hp : p ≠ 2) (hq : q ≠ 2) :
legendreSym q p = (-1) ^ (p / 2 * (q / 2)) * legendreSym p q := by
rcases eq_or_ne p q with h | h
· subst p
rw [(eq_zero_iff q q).mpr (mod_cast natCast_self q), mul_zero]
· have qr := congr_arg (· * legendreSym p q) (quadratic_reciprocity hp hq h)
have : ((q : ℤ) : ZMod p) ≠ 0 := mod_cast prime_ne_zero p q h
simpa only [mul_assoc, ← pow_two, sq_one p this, mul_one] using qr
#align legendre_sym.quadratic_reciprocity' legendreSym.quadratic_reciprocity'
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/QuadraticReciprocity.lean | 150 | 153 | theorem quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four (hp : p % 4 = 1) (hq : q ≠ 2) :
legendreSym q p = legendreSym p q := by |
rw [quadratic_reciprocity' (Prime.mod_two_eq_one_iff_ne_two.mp (odd_of_mod_four_eq_one hp)) hq,
pow_mul, neg_one_pow_div_two_of_one_mod_four hp, one_pow, one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.IsPrimary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.Order.Minimal
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.minimal_prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
section
variable {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (I J : Ideal R)
protected def Ideal.minimalPrimes : Set (Ideal R) :=
minimals (· ≤ ·) { p | p.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p }
#align ideal.minimal_primes Ideal.minimalPrimes
variable (R) in
def minimalPrimes : Set (Ideal R) :=
Ideal.minimalPrimes ⊥
#align minimal_primes minimalPrimes
lemma minimalPrimes_eq_minimals : minimalPrimes R = minimals (· ≤ ·) (setOf Ideal.IsPrime) :=
congr_arg (minimals (· ≤ ·)) (by simp)
variable {I J}
theorem Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le [J.IsPrime] (e : I ≤ J) : ∃ p ∈ I.minimalPrimes, p ≤ J := by
suffices
∃ m ∈ { p : (Ideal R)ᵒᵈ | Ideal.IsPrime p ∧ I ≤ OrderDual.ofDual p },
OrderDual.toDual J ≤ m ∧ ∀ z ∈ { p : (Ideal R)ᵒᵈ | Ideal.IsPrime p ∧ I ≤ p }, m ≤ z → z = m by
obtain ⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := this
simp_rw [← @eq_comm _ p] at h₃
exact ⟨p, ⟨h₁, fun a b c => le_of_eq (h₃ a b c)⟩, h₂⟩
apply zorn_nonempty_partialOrder₀
swap
· refine ⟨show J.IsPrime by infer_instance, e⟩
rintro (c : Set (Ideal R)) hc hc' J' hJ'
refine
⟨OrderDual.toDual (sInf c),
⟨Ideal.sInf_isPrime_of_isChain ⟨J', hJ'⟩ hc'.symm fun x hx => (hc hx).1, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [OrderDual.ofDual_toDual, le_sInf_iff]
exact fun _ hx => (hc hx).2
· rintro z hz
rw [OrderDual.le_toDual]
exact sInf_le hz
#align ideal.exists_minimal_primes_le Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.radical_minimalPrimes : I.radical.minimalPrimes = I.minimalPrimes := by
rw [Ideal.minimalPrimes, Ideal.minimalPrimes]
ext p
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, b⟩
· refine ⟨⟨a, a.radical_le_iff.1 ha⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_imp] at *
exact fun _ h2 h3 h4 => b h2 (h2.radical_le_iff.2 h3) h4
· refine ⟨⟨a, a.radical_le_iff.2 ha⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, and_imp] at *
exact fun _ h2 h3 h4 => b h2 (h2.radical_le_iff.1 h3) h4
#align ideal.radical_minimal_primes Ideal.radical_minimalPrimes
@[simp]
theorem Ideal.sInf_minimalPrimes : sInf I.minimalPrimes = I.radical := by
rw [I.radical_eq_sInf]
apply le_antisymm
· intro x hx
rw [Ideal.mem_sInf] at hx ⊢
rintro J ⟨e, hJ⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := Ideal.exists_minimalPrimes_le e
exact hp' (hx hp)
· apply sInf_le_sInf _
intro I hI
exact hI.1.symm
#align ideal.Inf_minimal_primes Ideal.sInf_minimalPrimes
theorem Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes_of_injective {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (p) (H : p ∈ minimalPrimes R) :
∃ p' : Ideal S, p'.IsPrime ∧ p'.comap f = p := by
have := H.1.1
have : Nontrivial (Localization (Submonoid.map f p.primeCompl)) := by
refine ⟨⟨1, 0, ?_⟩⟩
convert (IsLocalization.map_injective_of_injective p.primeCompl (Localization.AtPrime p)
(Localization <| p.primeCompl.map f) hf).ne one_ne_zero
· rw [map_one]
· rw [map_zero]
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal (Localization (Submonoid.map f p.primeCompl))
refine ⟨M.comap (algebraMap S <| Localization (Submonoid.map f p.primeCompl)), inferInstance, ?_⟩
rw [Ideal.comap_comap, ← @IsLocalization.map_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Localization.isLocalization
_ _ _ _ p.primeCompl.le_comap_map _ Localization.isLocalization,
← Ideal.comap_comap]
suffices _ ≤ p by exact this.antisymm (H.2 ⟨inferInstance, bot_le⟩ this)
intro x hx
by_contra h
apply hM.ne_top
apply M.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem hx
apply IsUnit.map
apply IsLocalization.map_units _ (show p.primeCompl from ⟨x, h⟩)
#align ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimal_primes_of_injective Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes_of_injective
end
section
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {I J : Ideal R}
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/MinimalPrime.lean | 134 | 164 | theorem Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes {I : Ideal S} (f : R →+* S) (p)
(H : p ∈ (I.comap f).minimalPrimes) : ∃ p' : Ideal S, p'.IsPrime ∧ I ≤ p' ∧ p'.comap f = p := by |
have := H.1.1
let f' := (Ideal.Quotient.mk I).comp f
have e : RingHom.ker f' = I.comap f := by
ext1
exact Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero _
have : RingHom.ker (Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f') ≤ p := by
rw [Ideal.mk_ker, e]
exact H.1.2
suffices _ by
have ⟨p', hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Ideal.exists_comap_eq_of_mem_minimalPrimes_of_injective
(RingHom.kerLift_injective f') (p.map <| Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f') this
refine ⟨p'.comap <| Ideal.Quotient.mk I, Ideal.IsPrime.comap _, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact Ideal.mk_ker.symm.trans_le (Ideal.comap_mono bot_le)
· convert congr_arg (Ideal.comap <| Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f') hp₂
rwa [Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective (Ideal.Quotient.mk <| RingHom.ker f')
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective, eq_comm, sup_eq_left]
refine ⟨⟨?_, bot_le⟩, ?_⟩
· apply Ideal.map_isPrime_of_surjective _ this
exact Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
· rintro q ⟨hq, -⟩ hq'
rw [← Ideal.map_comap_of_surjective
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (RingHom.ker ((Ideal.Quotient.mk I).comp f)))
Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective q]
apply Ideal.map_mono
apply H.2
· refine ⟨inferInstance, (Ideal.mk_ker.trans e).symm.trans_le (Ideal.comap_mono bot_le)⟩
· refine (Ideal.comap_mono hq').trans ?_
rw [Ideal.comap_map_of_surjective]
exacts [sup_le rfl.le this, Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal NNReal MeasureTheory.Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
noncomputable
def Measure.withDensity {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ) (by simp) fun s hs hd =>
lintegral_iUnion hs hd _
#align measure_theory.measure.with_density MeasureTheory.Measure.withDensity
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_apply (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ :=
Measure.ofMeasurable_apply s hs
#align measure_theory.with_density_apply MeasureTheory.withDensity_apply
theorem withDensity_apply_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ μ.withDensity f s := by
let t := toMeasurable (μ.withDensity f) s
calc
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_set (subset_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)
_ = μ.withDensity f t :=
(withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable (withDensity μ f) s)).symm
_ = μ.withDensity f s := measure_toMeasurable s
theorem withDensity_apply' [SFinite μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
μ.withDensity f s = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (withDensity_apply_le f s)
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
μ.withDensity f s ≤ μ.withDensity f t := measure_mono (subset_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := withDensity_apply f (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
_ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by congr 1; exact restrict_toMeasurable_of_sFinite s
@[simp]
lemma withDensity_zero_left (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : (0 : Measure α).withDensity f = 0 := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs]
simp
theorem withDensity_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f = μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (ae_restrict_of_ae h)
#align measure_theory.with_density_congr_ae MeasureTheory.withDensity_congr_ae
lemma withDensity_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ.withDensity f ≤ μ.withDensity g := by
refine le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
refine set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs ?_
filter_upwards [hfg] with x h_le using fun _ ↦ h_le
theorem withDensity_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.add_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs,
← lintegral_add_left hf]
simp only [Pi.add_apply]
#align measure_theory.with_density_add_left MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_left
theorem withDensity_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
μ.withDensity (f + g) = μ.withDensity f + μ.withDensity g := by
simpa only [add_comm] using withDensity_add_left hg f
#align measure_theory.with_density_add_right MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_right
theorem withDensity_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ + ν).withDensity f = μ.withDensity f + ν.withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_add, lintegral_add_measure, Measure.add_apply]
#align measure_theory.with_density_add_measure MeasureTheory.withDensity_add_measure
theorem withDensity_sum {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : ι → Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(sum μ).withDensity f = sum fun n => (μ n).withDensity f := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply f hs, restrict_sum μ hs, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align measure_theory.with_density_sum MeasureTheory.withDensity_sum
theorem withDensity_smul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul r hf]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.with_density_smul MeasureTheory.withDensity_smul
theorem withDensity_smul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
μ.withDensity (r • f) = r • μ.withDensity f := by
refine Measure.ext fun s hs => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, ← lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.with_density_smul' MeasureTheory.withDensity_smul'
theorem withDensity_smul_measure (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(r • μ).withDensity f = r • μ.withDensity f := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, Measure.coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, withDensity_apply _ hs,
smul_eq_mul, set_lintegral_smul_measure]
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity f) :=
{ measure_univ_lt_top := by
rwa [withDensity_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_univ, lt_top_iff_ne_top] }
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_with_density MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_withDensity
theorem withDensity_absolutelyContinuous {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity f ≪ μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs₁ hs₂ => ?_
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs₁]
exact set_lintegral_measure_zero _ _ hs₂
#align measure_theory.with_density_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.withDensity_absolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_zero : μ.withDensity 0 = 0 := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
#align measure_theory.with_density_zero MeasureTheory.withDensity_zero
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_one : μ.withDensity 1 = μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
#align measure_theory.with_density_one MeasureTheory.withDensity_one
@[simp]
theorem withDensity_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : μ.withDensity (fun _ ↦ c) = c • μ := by
ext1 s hs
simp [withDensity_apply _ hs]
theorem withDensity_tsum {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, Measurable (f i)) :
μ.withDensity (∑' n, f n) = sum fun n => μ.withDensity (f n) := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs, withDensity_apply _ hs]
change ∫⁻ x in s, (∑' n, f n) x ∂μ = ∑' i : ℕ, ∫⁻ x, f i x ∂μ.restrict s
rw [← lintegral_tsum fun i => (h i).aemeasurable]
exact lintegral_congr fun x => tsum_apply (Pi.summable.2 fun _ => ENNReal.summable)
#align measure_theory.with_density_tsum MeasureTheory.withDensity_tsum
theorem withDensity_indicator {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator f) = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [withDensity_apply _ ht, lintegral_indicator _ hs, restrict_comm hs, ←
withDensity_apply _ ht]
#align measure_theory.with_density_indicator MeasureTheory.withDensity_indicator
theorem withDensity_indicator_one {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensity (s.indicator 1) = μ.restrict s := by
rw [withDensity_indicator hs, withDensity_one]
#align measure_theory.with_density_indicator_one MeasureTheory.withDensity_indicator_one
theorem withDensity_ofReal_mutuallySingular {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) ⟂ₘ
μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| -f x := by
set S : Set α := { x | f x < 0 }
have hS : MeasurableSet S := measurableSet_lt hf measurable_const
refine ⟨S, hS, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact (ae_restrict_mem hS).mono fun x hx => ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (le_of_lt hx)
· rw [withDensity_apply _ hS.compl, lintegral_eq_zero_iff hf.neg.ennreal_ofReal, EventuallyEq]
exact
(ae_restrict_mem hS.compl).mono fun x hx =>
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (not_lt.1 <| mt neg_pos.1 hx)
#align measure_theory.with_density_of_real_mutually_singular MeasureTheory.withDensity_ofReal_mutuallySingular
theorem restrict_withDensity {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply _ (ht.inter hs),
restrict_restrict ht]
#align measure_theory.restrict_with_density MeasureTheory.restrict_withDensity
theorem restrict_withDensity' [SFinite μ] (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(μ.withDensity f).restrict s = (μ.restrict s).withDensity f := by
ext1 t ht
rw [restrict_apply ht, withDensity_apply _ ht, withDensity_apply' _ (t ∩ s),
restrict_restrict ht]
lemma trim_withDensity {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable[m] f) :
(μ.withDensity f).trim hm = (μ.trim hm).withDensity f := by
refine @Measure.ext _ m _ _ (fun s hs ↦ ?_)
rw [withDensity_apply _ hs, restrict_trim _ _ hs, lintegral_trim _ hf, trim_measurableSet_eq _ hs,
withDensity_apply _ (hm s hs)]
lemma Measure.MutuallySingular.withDensity {ν : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ ⟂ₘ ν) :
μ.withDensity f ⟂ₘ ν :=
MutuallySingular.mono_ac h (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _) AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensity.lean | 233 | 236 | theorem withDensity_eq_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h : μ.withDensity f = 0) :
f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by |
rw [← lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf, ← set_lintegral_univ, ← withDensity_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ,
h, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.Basic
open Set Function
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section TotallyDisconnected
def IsTotallyDisconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ t, t ⊆ s → IsPreconnected t → t.Subsingleton
#align is_totally_disconnected IsTotallyDisconnected
theorem isTotallyDisconnected_empty : IsTotallyDisconnected (∅ : Set α) := fun _ ht _ _ x_in _ _ =>
(ht x_in).elim
#align is_totally_disconnected_empty isTotallyDisconnected_empty
theorem isTotallyDisconnected_singleton {x} : IsTotallyDisconnected ({x} : Set α) := fun _ ht _ =>
subsingleton_singleton.anti ht
#align is_totally_disconnected_singleton isTotallyDisconnected_singleton
@[mk_iff]
class TotallyDisconnectedSpace (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : Prop where
isTotallyDisconnected_univ : IsTotallyDisconnected (univ : Set α)
#align totally_disconnected_space TotallyDisconnectedSpace
theorem IsPreconnected.subsingleton [TotallyDisconnectedSpace α] {s : Set α}
(h : IsPreconnected s) : s.Subsingleton :=
TotallyDisconnectedSpace.isTotallyDisconnected_univ s (subset_univ s) h
#align is_preconnected.subsingleton IsPreconnected.subsingleton
instance Pi.totallyDisconnectedSpace {α : Type*} {β : α → Type*}
[∀ a, TopologicalSpace (β a)] [∀ a, TotallyDisconnectedSpace (β a)] :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace (∀ a : α, β a) :=
⟨fun t _ h2 =>
have this : ∀ a, IsPreconnected ((fun x : ∀ a, β a => x a) '' t) := fun a =>
h2.image (fun x => x a) (continuous_apply a).continuousOn
fun x x_in y y_in => funext fun a => (this a).subsingleton ⟨x, x_in, rfl⟩ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩⟩
#align pi.totally_disconnected_space Pi.totallyDisconnectedSpace
instance Prod.totallyDisconnectedSpace [TopologicalSpace β] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace α]
[TotallyDisconnectedSpace β] : TotallyDisconnectedSpace (α × β) :=
⟨fun t _ h2 =>
have H1 : IsPreconnected (Prod.fst '' t) := h2.image Prod.fst continuous_fst.continuousOn
have H2 : IsPreconnected (Prod.snd '' t) := h2.image Prod.snd continuous_snd.continuousOn
fun x hx y hy =>
Prod.ext (H1.subsingleton ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
(H2.subsingleton ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)⟩
#align prod.totally_disconnected_space Prod.totallyDisconnectedSpace
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace α] [TotallyDisconnectedSpace β] :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace (Sum α β) := by
refine ⟨fun s _ hs => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ | ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩ := Sum.isPreconnected_iff.1 hs
· exact ht.subsingleton.image _
· exact ht.subsingleton.image _
instance [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] [∀ i, TotallyDisconnectedSpace (π i)] :
TotallyDisconnectedSpace (Σi, π i) := by
refine ⟨fun s _ hs => ?_⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact subsingleton_empty
· obtain ⟨a, t, ht, rfl⟩ := Sigma.isConnected_iff.1 ⟨h, hs⟩
exact ht.isPreconnected.subsingleton.image _
-- Porting note: reformulated using `Pairwise`
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/TotallyDisconnected.lean | 93 | 104 | theorem isTotallyDisconnected_of_isClopen_set {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
(hX : Pairwise fun x y => ∃ (U : Set X), IsClopen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U) :
IsTotallyDisconnected (Set.univ : Set X) := by |
rintro S - hS
unfold Set.Subsingleton
by_contra! h_contra
rcases h_contra with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
obtain ⟨U, hU, hxU, hyU⟩ := hX hxy
specialize
hS U Uᶜ hU.2 hU.compl.2 (fun a _ => em (a ∈ U)) ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩
rw [inter_compl_self, Set.inter_empty] at hS
exact Set.not_nonempty_empty hS
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
#align_import data.list.dedup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d9e96a3e3e0894e93e10aff5244f4c96655bac1c"
universe u
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem dedup_nil : dedup [] = ([] : List α) :=
rfl
#align list.dedup_nil List.dedup_nil
theorem dedup_cons_of_mem' {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ dedup l) : dedup (a :: l) = dedup l :=
pwFilter_cons_of_neg <| by simpa only [forall_mem_ne, not_not] using h
#align list.dedup_cons_of_mem' List.dedup_cons_of_mem'
theorem dedup_cons_of_not_mem' {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∉ dedup l) :
dedup (a :: l) = a :: dedup l :=
pwFilter_cons_of_pos <| by simpa only [forall_mem_ne] using h
#align list.dedup_cons_of_not_mem' List.dedup_cons_of_not_mem'
@[simp]
theorem mem_dedup {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ dedup l ↔ a ∈ l := by
have := not_congr (@forall_mem_pwFilter α (· ≠ ·) _ ?_ a l)
· simpa only [dedup, forall_mem_ne, not_not] using this
· intros x y z xz
exact not_and_or.1 <| mt (fun h ↦ h.1.trans h.2) xz
#align list.mem_dedup List.mem_dedup
@[simp]
theorem dedup_cons_of_mem {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : dedup (a :: l) = dedup l :=
dedup_cons_of_mem' <| mem_dedup.2 h
#align list.dedup_cons_of_mem List.dedup_cons_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem dedup_cons_of_not_mem {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∉ l) : dedup (a :: l) = a :: dedup l :=
dedup_cons_of_not_mem' <| mt mem_dedup.1 h
#align list.dedup_cons_of_not_mem List.dedup_cons_of_not_mem
theorem dedup_sublist : ∀ l : List α, dedup l <+ l :=
pwFilter_sublist
#align list.dedup_sublist List.dedup_sublist
theorem dedup_subset : ∀ l : List α, dedup l ⊆ l :=
pwFilter_subset
#align list.dedup_subset List.dedup_subset
theorem subset_dedup (l : List α) : l ⊆ dedup l := fun _ => mem_dedup.2
#align list.subset_dedup List.subset_dedup
theorem nodup_dedup : ∀ l : List α, Nodup (dedup l) :=
pairwise_pwFilter
#align list.nodup_dedup List.nodup_dedup
theorem headI_dedup [Inhabited α] (l : List α) :
l.dedup.headI = if l.headI ∈ l.tail then l.tail.dedup.headI else l.headI :=
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by by_cases ha : a ∈ l <;> simp [ha, List.dedup_cons_of_mem]
#align list.head_dedup List.headI_dedup
theorem tail_dedup [Inhabited α] (l : List α) :
l.dedup.tail = if l.headI ∈ l.tail then l.tail.dedup.tail else l.tail.dedup :=
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by by_cases ha : a ∈ l <;> simp [ha, List.dedup_cons_of_mem]
#align list.tail_dedup List.tail_dedup
theorem dedup_eq_self {l : List α} : dedup l = l ↔ Nodup l :=
pwFilter_eq_self
#align list.dedup_eq_self List.dedup_eq_self
theorem dedup_eq_cons (l : List α) (a : α) (l' : List α) :
l.dedup = a :: l' ↔ a ∈ l ∧ a ∉ l' ∧ l.dedup.tail = l' := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨mem_dedup.1 (h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _), fun ha => ?_, by rw [h, tail_cons]⟩
have := count_pos_iff_mem.2 ha
have : count a l.dedup ≤ 1 := nodup_iff_count_le_one.1 (nodup_dedup l) a
rw [h, count_cons_self] at this
omega
· have := @List.cons_head!_tail α ⟨a⟩ _ (ne_nil_of_mem (mem_dedup.2 h.1))
have hal : a ∈ l.dedup := mem_dedup.2 h.1
rw [← this, mem_cons, or_iff_not_imp_right] at hal
exact this ▸ h.2.2.symm ▸ cons_eq_cons.2 ⟨(hal (h.2.2.symm ▸ h.2.1)).symm, rfl⟩
#align list.dedup_eq_cons List.dedup_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_nil (l : List α) : l.dedup = [] ↔ l = [] := by
induction' l with a l hl
· exact Iff.rfl
· by_cases h : a ∈ l
· simp only [List.dedup_cons_of_mem h, hl, List.ne_nil_of_mem h]
· simp only [List.dedup_cons_of_not_mem h, List.cons_ne_nil]
#align list.dedup_eq_nil List.dedup_eq_nil
protected theorem Nodup.dedup {l : List α} (h : l.Nodup) : l.dedup = l :=
List.dedup_eq_self.2 h
#align list.nodup.dedup List.Nodup.dedup
@[simp]
theorem dedup_idem {l : List α} : dedup (dedup l) = dedup l :=
pwFilter_idem
#align list.dedup_idempotent List.dedup_idem
| Mathlib/Data/List/Dedup.lean | 126 | 132 | theorem dedup_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : dedup (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ∪ dedup l₂ := by |
induction' l₁ with a l₁ IH; · rfl
simp only [cons_union] at *
rw [← IH, cons_append]
by_cases h : a ∈ dedup (l₁ ++ l₂)
· rw [dedup_cons_of_mem' h, insert_of_mem h]
· rw [dedup_cons_of_not_mem' h, insert_of_not_mem h]
|
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder
import Mathlib.Order.MinMax
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
#align_import algebra.order.monoid.canonical.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
class ExistsMulOfLE (α : Type u) [Mul α] [LE α] : Prop where
exists_mul_of_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → ∃ c : α, b = a * c
#align has_exists_mul_of_le ExistsMulOfLE
class ExistsAddOfLE (α : Type u) [Add α] [LE α] : Prop where
exists_add_of_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → ∃ c : α, b = a + c
#align has_exists_add_of_le ExistsAddOfLE
attribute [to_additive] ExistsMulOfLE
export ExistsMulOfLE (exists_mul_of_le)
export ExistsAddOfLE (exists_add_of_le)
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) Group.existsMulOfLE (α : Type u) [Group α] [LE α] : ExistsMulOfLE α :=
⟨fun {a b} _ => ⟨a⁻¹ * b, (mul_inv_cancel_left _ _).symm⟩⟩
#align group.has_exists_mul_of_le Group.existsMulOfLE
#align add_group.has_exists_add_of_le AddGroup.existsAddOfLE
class CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedAddCommMonoid α, OrderBot α where
protected exists_add_of_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → ∃ c, b = a + c
protected le_self_add : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a + b
#align canonically_ordered_add_monoid CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
#align canonically_ordered_add_monoid.to_order_bot CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid.toOrderBot
@[to_additive]
class CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid (α : Type*) extends OrderedCommMonoid α, OrderBot α where
protected exists_mul_of_le : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → ∃ c, b = a * c
protected le_self_mul : ∀ a b : α, a ≤ a * b
#align canonically_ordered_monoid CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid
#align canonically_ordered_monoid.to_order_bot CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid.existsMulOfLE (α : Type u)
[h : CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid α] : ExistsMulOfLE α :=
{ h with }
#align canonically_ordered_monoid.has_exists_mul_of_le CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid.existsMulOfLE
#align canonically_ordered_add_monoid.has_exists_add_of_le CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid.existsAddOfLE
section CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid
variable [CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem le_self_mul : a ≤ a * c :=
CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid.le_self_mul _ _
#align le_self_mul le_self_mul
#align le_self_add le_self_add
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_self : a ≤ b * a := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact le_self_mul
#align le_mul_self le_mul_self
#align le_add_self le_add_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem self_le_mul_right (a b : α) : a ≤ a * b :=
le_self_mul
#align self_le_mul_right self_le_mul_right
#align self_le_add_right self_le_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem self_le_mul_left (a b : α) : a ≤ b * a :=
le_mul_self
#align self_le_mul_left self_le_mul_left
#align self_le_add_left self_le_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_left : a * b ≤ c → a ≤ c :=
le_self_mul.trans
#align le_of_mul_le_left le_of_mul_le_left
#align le_of_add_le_left le_of_add_le_left
@[to_additive]
theorem le_of_mul_le_right : a * b ≤ c → b ≤ c :=
le_mul_self.trans
#align le_of_mul_le_right le_of_mul_le_right
#align le_of_add_le_right le_of_add_le_right
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_left : a ≤ b → a ≤ b * c :=
le_self_mul.trans'
#align le_mul_of_le_left le_mul_of_le_left
#align le_add_of_le_left le_add_of_le_left
@[to_additive]
theorem le_mul_of_le_right : a ≤ c → a ≤ b * c :=
le_mul_self.trans'
#align le_mul_of_le_right le_mul_of_le_right
#align le_add_of_le_right le_add_of_le_right
@[to_additive]
theorem le_iff_exists_mul : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ c, b = a * c :=
⟨exists_mul_of_le, by
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
exact le_self_mul⟩
#align le_iff_exists_mul le_iff_exists_mul
#align le_iff_exists_add le_iff_exists_add
@[to_additive]
theorem le_iff_exists_mul' : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ c, b = c * a := by
simp only [mul_comm _ a, le_iff_exists_mul]
#align le_iff_exists_mul' le_iff_exists_mul'
#align le_iff_exists_add' le_iff_exists_add'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zero_le]
theorem one_le (a : α) : 1 ≤ a :=
le_iff_exists_mul.mpr ⟨a, (one_mul _).symm⟩
#align one_le one_le
#align zero_le zero_le
@[to_additive]
theorem bot_eq_one : (⊥ : α) = 1 :=
le_antisymm bot_le (one_le ⊥)
#align bot_eq_one bot_eq_one
#align bot_eq_zero bot_eq_zero
--TODO: This is a special case of `mul_eq_one`. We need the instance
-- `CanonicallyOrderedCommMonoid α → Unique αˣ`
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff : a * b = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∧ b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff' (one_le _) (one_le _)
#align mul_eq_one_iff mul_eq_one_iff
#align add_eq_zero_iff add_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem le_one_iff_eq_one : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
(one_le a).le_iff_eq
#align le_one_iff_eq_one le_one_iff_eq_one
#align nonpos_iff_eq_zero nonpos_iff_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_lt_iff_ne_one : 1 < a ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
(one_le a).lt_iff_ne.trans ne_comm
#align one_lt_iff_ne_one one_lt_iff_ne_one
#align pos_iff_ne_zero pos_iff_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_or_one_lt (a : α) : a = 1 ∨ 1 < a := (one_le a).eq_or_lt.imp_left Eq.symm
#align eq_one_or_one_lt eq_one_or_one_lt
#align eq_zero_or_pos eq_zero_or_pos
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_pos_iff]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Canonical/Defs.lean | 242 | 243 | theorem one_lt_mul_iff : 1 < a * b ↔ 1 < a ∨ 1 < b := by |
simp only [one_lt_iff_ne_one, Ne, mul_eq_one_iff, not_and_or]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.BalancedCoreHull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Matrix
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Simple
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Determinant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
#align_import topology.algebra.module.finite_dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9425b6f8220e53b059f5a4904786c3c4b50fc057"
universe u v w x
noncomputable section
open Set FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace Filter
section NormedField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [hnorm : NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalAddGroup E] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E] {F : Type w} [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] [TopologicalSpace F] [TopologicalAddGroup F] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F] {F' : Type x}
[AddCommGroup F'] [Module 𝕜 F'] [TopologicalSpace F'] [TopologicalAddGroup F']
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F']
theorem unique_topology_of_t2 {t : TopologicalSpace 𝕜} (h₁ : @TopologicalAddGroup 𝕜 t _)
(h₂ : @ContinuousSMul 𝕜 𝕜 _ hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace t) (h₃ : @T2Space 𝕜 t) :
t = hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
-- Let `𝓣₀` denote the topology on `𝕜` induced by the norm, and `𝓣` be any T2 vector
-- topology on `𝕜`. To show that `𝓣₀ = 𝓣`, it suffices to show that they have the same
-- neighborhoods of 0.
refine TopologicalAddGroup.ext h₁ inferInstance (le_antisymm ?_ ?_)
· -- To show `𝓣 ≤ 𝓣₀`, we have to show that closed balls are `𝓣`-neighborhoods of 0.
rw [Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.ge_iff]
-- Let `ε > 0`. Since `𝕜` is nontrivially normed, we have `0 < ‖ξ₀‖ < ε` for some `ξ₀ : 𝕜`.
intro ε hε
rcases NormedField.exists_norm_lt 𝕜 hε with ⟨ξ₀, hξ₀, hξ₀ε⟩
-- Since `ξ₀ ≠ 0` and `𝓣` is T2, we know that `{ξ₀}ᶜ` is a `𝓣`-neighborhood of 0.
-- Porting note: added `mem_compl_singleton_iff.mpr`
have : {ξ₀}ᶜ ∈ @nhds 𝕜 t 0 := IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_compl_singleton <|
mem_compl_singleton_iff.mpr <| Ne.symm <| norm_ne_zero_iff.mp hξ₀.ne.symm
-- Thus, its balanced core `𝓑` is too. Let's show that the closed ball of radius `ε` contains
-- `𝓑`, which will imply that the closed ball is indeed a `𝓣`-neighborhood of 0.
have : balancedCore 𝕜 {ξ₀}ᶜ ∈ @nhds 𝕜 t 0 := balancedCore_mem_nhds_zero this
refine mem_of_superset this fun ξ hξ => ?_
-- Let `ξ ∈ 𝓑`. We want to show `‖ξ‖ < ε`. If `ξ = 0`, this is trivial.
by_cases hξ0 : ξ = 0
· rw [hξ0]
exact Metric.mem_closedBall_self hε.le
· rw [mem_closedBall_zero_iff]
-- Now suppose `ξ ≠ 0`. By contradiction, let's assume `ε < ‖ξ‖`, and show that
-- `ξ₀ ∈ 𝓑 ⊆ {ξ₀}ᶜ`, which is a contradiction.
by_contra! h
suffices (ξ₀ * ξ⁻¹) • ξ ∈ balancedCore 𝕜 {ξ₀}ᶜ by
rw [smul_eq_mul 𝕜, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel hξ0, mul_one] at this
exact not_mem_compl_iff.mpr (mem_singleton ξ₀) ((balancedCore_subset _) this)
-- For that, we use that `𝓑` is balanced : since `‖ξ₀‖ < ε < ‖ξ‖`, we have `‖ξ₀ / ξ‖ ≤ 1`,
-- hence `ξ₀ = (ξ₀ / ξ) • ξ ∈ 𝓑` because `ξ ∈ 𝓑`.
refine (balancedCore_balanced _).smul_mem ?_ hξ
rw [norm_mul, norm_inv, mul_inv_le_iff (norm_pos_iff.mpr hξ0), mul_one]
exact (hξ₀ε.trans h).le
· -- Finally, to show `𝓣₀ ≤ 𝓣`, we simply argue that `id = (fun x ↦ x • 1)` is continuous from
-- `(𝕜, 𝓣₀)` to `(𝕜, 𝓣)` because `(•) : (𝕜, 𝓣₀) × (𝕜, 𝓣) → (𝕜, 𝓣)` is continuous.
calc
@nhds 𝕜 hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace 0 =
map id (@nhds 𝕜 hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace 0) :=
map_id.symm
_ = map (fun x => id x • (1 : 𝕜)) (@nhds 𝕜 hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace 0) := by
conv_rhs =>
congr
ext
rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
_ ≤ @nhds 𝕜 t ((0 : 𝕜) • (1 : 𝕜)) :=
(@Tendsto.smul_const _ _ _ hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace t _ _ _ _ _
tendsto_id (1 : 𝕜))
_ = @nhds 𝕜 t 0 := by rw [zero_smul]
#align unique_topology_of_t2 unique_topology_of_t2
theorem LinearMap.continuous_of_isClosed_ker (l : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜)
(hl : IsClosed (LinearMap.ker l : Set E)) :
Continuous l := by
-- `l` is either constant or surjective. If it is constant, the result is trivial.
by_cases H : finrank 𝕜 (LinearMap.range l) = 0
· rw [Submodule.finrank_eq_zero, LinearMap.range_eq_bot] at H
rw [H]
exact continuous_zero
· -- In the case where `l` is surjective, we factor it as `φ : (E ⧸ l.ker) ≃ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜`. Note that
-- `E ⧸ l.ker` is T2 since `l.ker` is closed.
have : finrank 𝕜 (LinearMap.range l) = 1 :=
le_antisymm (finrank_self 𝕜 ▸ l.range.finrank_le) (zero_lt_iff.mpr H)
have hi : Function.Injective ((LinearMap.ker l).liftQ l (le_refl _)) := by
rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
exact Submodule.ker_liftQ_eq_bot _ _ _ (le_refl _)
have hs : Function.Surjective ((LinearMap.ker l).liftQ l (le_refl _)) := by
rw [← LinearMap.range_eq_top, Submodule.range_liftQ]
exact Submodule.eq_top_of_finrank_eq ((finrank_self 𝕜).symm ▸ this)
let φ : (E ⧸ LinearMap.ker l) ≃ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearEquiv.ofBijective ((LinearMap.ker l).liftQ l (le_refl _)) ⟨hi, hs⟩
have hlφ : (l : E → 𝕜) = φ ∘ (LinearMap.ker l).mkQ := by ext; rfl
-- Since the quotient map `E →ₗ[𝕜] (E ⧸ l.ker)` is continuous, the continuity of `l` will follow
-- form the continuity of `φ`.
suffices Continuous φ.toEquiv by
rw [hlφ]
exact this.comp continuous_quot_mk
-- The pullback by `φ.symm` of the quotient topology is a T2 topology on `𝕜`, because `φ.symm`
-- is injective. Since `φ.symm` is linear, it is also a vector space topology.
-- Hence, we know that it is equal to the topology induced by the norm.
have : induced φ.toEquiv.symm inferInstance = hnorm.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
refine unique_topology_of_t2 (topologicalAddGroup_induced φ.symm.toLinearMap)
(continuousSMul_induced φ.symm.toLinearMap) ?_
-- Porting note: was `rw [t2Space_iff]`
refine (@t2Space_iff 𝕜 (induced (↑(LinearEquiv.toEquiv φ).symm) inferInstance)).mpr ?_
exact fun x y hxy =>
@separated_by_continuous _ _ (induced _ _) _ _ _ continuous_induced_dom _ _
(φ.toEquiv.symm.injective.ne hxy)
-- Finally, the pullback by `φ.symm` is exactly the pushforward by `φ`, so we have to prove
-- that `φ` is continuous when `𝕜` is endowed with the pushforward by `φ` of the quotient
-- topology, which is trivial by definition of the pushforward.
rw [this.symm, Equiv.induced_symm]
exact continuous_coinduced_rng
#align linear_map.continuous_of_is_closed_ker LinearMap.continuous_of_isClosed_ker
theorem LinearMap.continuous_iff_isClosed_ker (l : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) :
Continuous l ↔ IsClosed (LinearMap.ker l : Set E) :=
⟨fun h => isClosed_singleton.preimage h, l.continuous_of_isClosed_ker⟩
#align linear_map.continuous_iff_is_closed_ker LinearMap.continuous_iff_isClosed_ker
theorem LinearMap.continuous_of_nonzero_on_open (l : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (s : Set E) (hs₁ : IsOpen s)
(hs₂ : s.Nonempty) (hs₃ : ∀ x ∈ s, l x ≠ 0) : Continuous l := by
refine l.continuous_of_isClosed_ker (l.isClosed_or_dense_ker.resolve_right fun hl => ?_)
rcases hs₂ with ⟨x, hx⟩
have : x ∈ interior (LinearMap.ker l : Set E)ᶜ := by
rw [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
exact mem_of_superset (hs₁.mem_nhds hx) hs₃
rwa [hl.interior_compl] at this
#align linear_map.continuous_of_nonzero_on_open LinearMap.continuous_of_nonzero_on_open
variable [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
private theorem continuous_equivFun_basis_aux [T2Space E] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
(ξ : Basis ι 𝕜 E) : Continuous ξ.equivFun := by
letI : UniformSpace E := TopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace E
letI : UniformAddGroup E := comm_topologicalAddGroup_is_uniform
induction' hn : Fintype.card ι with n IH generalizing ι E
· rw [Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff] at hn
exact continuous_of_const fun x y => funext hn.elim
· haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E := of_fintype_basis ξ
-- first step: thanks to the induction hypothesis, any n-dimensional subspace is equivalent
-- to a standard space of dimension n, hence it is complete and therefore closed.
have H₁ : ∀ s : Submodule 𝕜 E, finrank 𝕜 s = n → IsClosed (s : Set E) := by
intro s s_dim
letI : UniformAddGroup s := s.toAddSubgroup.uniformAddGroup
let b := Basis.ofVectorSpace 𝕜 s
have U : UniformEmbedding b.equivFun.symm.toEquiv := by
have : Fintype.card (Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex 𝕜 s) = n := by
rw [← s_dim]
exact (finrank_eq_card_basis b).symm
have : Continuous b.equivFun := IH b this
exact
b.equivFun.symm.uniformEmbedding b.equivFun.symm.toLinearMap.continuous_on_pi this
have : IsComplete (s : Set E) :=
completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.1 ((completeSpace_congr U).1 (by infer_instance))
exact this.isClosed
-- second step: any linear form is continuous, as its kernel is closed by the first step
have H₂ : ∀ f : E →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜, Continuous f := by
intro f
by_cases H : finrank 𝕜 (LinearMap.range f) = 0
· rw [Submodule.finrank_eq_zero, LinearMap.range_eq_bot] at H
rw [H]
exact continuous_zero
· have : finrank 𝕜 (LinearMap.ker f) = n := by
have Z := f.finrank_range_add_finrank_ker
rw [finrank_eq_card_basis ξ, hn] at Z
have : finrank 𝕜 (LinearMap.range f) = 1 :=
le_antisymm (finrank_self 𝕜 ▸ f.range.finrank_le) (zero_lt_iff.mpr H)
rw [this, add_comm, Nat.add_one] at Z
exact Nat.succ.inj Z
have : IsClosed (LinearMap.ker f : Set E) := H₁ _ this
exact LinearMap.continuous_of_isClosed_ker f this
rw [continuous_pi_iff]
intro i
change Continuous (ξ.coord i)
exact H₂ (ξ.coord i)
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/FiniteDimension.lean | 245 | 260 | theorem LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional [T2Space E] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E]
(f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F') : Continuous f := by |
-- for the proof, go to a model vector space `b → 𝕜` thanks to `continuous_equivFun_basis`, and
-- argue that all linear maps there are continuous.
let b := Basis.ofVectorSpace 𝕜 E
have A : Continuous b.equivFun := continuous_equivFun_basis_aux b
have B : Continuous (f.comp (b.equivFun.symm : (Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex 𝕜 E → 𝕜) →ₗ[𝕜] E)) :=
LinearMap.continuous_on_pi _
have :
Continuous
(f.comp (b.equivFun.symm : (Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex 𝕜 E → 𝕜) →ₗ[𝕜] E) ∘ b.equivFun) :=
B.comp A
convert this
ext x
dsimp
rw [Basis.equivFun_symm_apply, Basis.sum_repr]
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PrimitiveElement
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Minpoly
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois
#align_import ring_theory.norm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fecd3520d2a236856f254f27714b80dcfe28ea57"
universe u v w
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring S]
variable [Algebra R S]
variable {K L F : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Field F]
variable [Algebra K L] [Algebra K F]
variable {ι : Type w}
open FiniteDimensional
open LinearMap
open Matrix Polynomial
open scoped Matrix
namespace Algebra
variable (R)
noncomputable def norm : S →* R :=
LinearMap.det.comp (lmul R S).toRingHom.toMonoidHom
#align algebra.norm Algebra.norm
theorem norm_apply (x : S) : norm R x = LinearMap.det (lmul R S x) := rfl
#align algebra.norm_apply Algebra.norm_apply
theorem norm_eq_one_of_not_exists_basis (h : ¬∃ s : Finset S, Nonempty (Basis s R S)) (x : S) :
norm R x = 1 := by rw [norm_apply, LinearMap.det]; split_ifs <;> trivial
#align algebra.norm_eq_one_of_not_exists_basis Algebra.norm_eq_one_of_not_exists_basis
variable {R}
theorem norm_eq_one_of_not_module_finite (h : ¬Module.Finite R S) (x : S) : norm R x = 1 := by
refine norm_eq_one_of_not_exists_basis _ (mt ?_ h) _
rintro ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
exact Module.Finite.of_basis b
#align algebra.norm_eq_one_of_not_module_finite Algebra.norm_eq_one_of_not_module_finite
-- Can't be a `simp` lemma because it depends on a choice of basis
theorem norm_eq_matrix_det [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R S) (s : S) :
norm R s = Matrix.det (Algebra.leftMulMatrix b s) := by
rw [norm_apply, ← LinearMap.det_toMatrix b, ← toMatrix_lmul_eq]; rfl
#align algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det Algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det
theorem norm_algebraMap_of_basis [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R S) (x : R) :
norm R (algebraMap R S x) = x ^ Fintype.card ι := by
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [norm_apply, ← det_toMatrix b, lmul_algebraMap]
convert @det_diagonal _ _ _ _ _ fun _ : ι => x
· ext (i j); rw [toMatrix_lsmul]
· rw [Finset.prod_const, Finset.card_univ]
#align algebra.norm_algebra_map_of_basis Algebra.norm_algebraMap_of_basis
@[simp]
protected theorem norm_algebraMap {L : Type*} [Ring L] [Algebra K L] (x : K) :
norm K (algebraMap K L x) = x ^ finrank K L := by
by_cases H : ∃ s : Finset L, Nonempty (Basis s K L)
· rw [norm_algebraMap_of_basis H.choose_spec.some, finrank_eq_card_basis H.choose_spec.some]
· rw [norm_eq_one_of_not_exists_basis K H, finrank_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis, pow_zero]
rintro ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
exact H ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
#align algebra.norm_algebra_map Algebra.norm_algebraMap
open IntermediateField
variable (K)
theorem norm_eq_norm_adjoin [FiniteDimensional K L] [IsSeparable K L] (x : L) :
norm K x = norm K (AdjoinSimple.gen K x) ^ finrank K⟮x⟯ L := by
letI := isSeparable_tower_top_of_isSeparable K K⟮x⟯ L
let pbL := Field.powerBasisOfFiniteOfSeparable K⟮x⟯ L
let pbx := IntermediateField.adjoin.powerBasis (IsSeparable.isIntegral K x)
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen K x, norm_eq_matrix_det (pbx.basis.smul pbL.basis) _,
smul_leftMulMatrix_algebraMap, det_blockDiagonal, norm_eq_matrix_det pbx.basis]
simp only [Finset.card_fin, Finset.prod_const]
congr
rw [← PowerBasis.finrank, AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen K x]
#align algebra.norm_eq_norm_adjoin Algebra.norm_eq_norm_adjoin
variable {K}
section IntermediateField
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Norm.lean | 214 | 221 | theorem _root_.IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.norm_gen_eq_one {x : L} (hx : ¬IsIntegral K x) :
norm K (AdjoinSimple.gen K x) = 1 := by |
rw [norm_eq_one_of_not_exists_basis]
contrapose! hx
obtain ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩ := hx
refine .of_mem_of_fg K⟮x⟯.toSubalgebra ?_ x ?_
· exact (Submodule.fg_iff_finiteDimensional _).mpr (of_fintype_basis b)
· exact IntermediateField.subset_adjoin K _ (Set.mem_singleton x)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"728baa2f54e6062c5879a3e397ac6bac323e506f"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finsupp Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {ι : Type w} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section DivisionRing
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
@[simp]
theorem irreducible_mul_leadingCoeff_inv {p : K[X]} :
Irreducible (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) ↔ Irreducible p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact irreducible_mul_isUnit
(isUnit_C.mpr (IsUnit.mk0 _ (inv_ne_zero (leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp0))))
@[simp] lemma dvd_mul_leadingCoeff_inv {p q : K[X]} (hp0 : p ≠ 0) :
q ∣ p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹ ↔ q ∣ p :=
IsUnit.dvd_mul_right <| isUnit_C.mpr <| IsUnit.mk0 _ <|
inv_ne_zero <| leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp0
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Lemmas.lean | 438 | 440 | theorem monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv {p : K[X]} (h : p ≠ 0) : Monic (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) := by |
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C,
mul_inv_cancel (show leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 from mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h)]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
#align_import data.list.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f808feb6c18afddb25e66a71d317643cf7fb5fbb"
universe u v
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
#align list.keys List.keys
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.keys_nil List.keys_nil
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
#align list.keys_cons List.keys_cons
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem Sigma.fst
#align list.mem_keys_of_mem List.mem_keys_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
#align list.exists_of_mem_keys List.exists_of_mem_keys
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
#align list.mem_keys List.mem_keys
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
#align list.not_mem_keys List.not_mem_keys
theorem not_eq_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨b, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
#align list.not_eq_key List.not_eq_key
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
#align list.nodupkeys List.NodupKeys
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
#align list.nodupkeys_iff_pairwise List.nodupKeys_iff_pairwise
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
#align list.nodupkeys.pairwise_ne List.NodupKeys.pairwise_ne
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
#align list.nodupkeys_nil List.nodupKeys_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
#align list.nodupkeys_cons List.nodupKeys_cons
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
#align list.not_mem_keys_of_nodupkeys_cons List.not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
#align list.nodupkeys_of_nodupkeys_cons List.nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
#align list.nodupkeys.eq_of_fst_eq List.NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
#align list.nodupkeys.eq_of_mk_mem List.NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
#align list.nodupkeys_singleton List.nodupKeys_singleton
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
#align list.nodupkeys.sublist List.NodupKeys.sublist
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
#align list.nodupkeys.nodup List.NodupKeys.nodup
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
#align list.perm_nodupkeys List.perm_nodupKeys
theorem nodupKeys_join {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_join, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne]
#align list.nodupkeys_join List.nodupKeys_join
theorem nodup_enum_map_fst (l : List α) : (l.enum.map Prod.fst).Nodup := by simp [List.nodup_range]
#align list.nodup_enum_map_fst List.nodup_enum_map_fst
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
#align list.mem_ext List.mem_ext
variable [DecidableEq α]
-- Porting note: renaming to `dlookup` since `lookup` already exists
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
#align list.lookup List.dlookup
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
#align list.lookup_nil List.dlookup_nil
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
#align list.lookup_cons_eq List.dlookup_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
#align list.lookup_cons_ne List.dlookup_cons_ne
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
#align list.lookup_is_some List.dlookup_isSome
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
#align list.lookup_eq_none List.dlookup_eq_none
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
#align list.of_mem_lookup List.of_mem_dlookup
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
cases' Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h)) with b' h'
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
#align list.mem_lookup List.mem_dlookup
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
#align list.map_lookup_eq_find List.map_dlookup_eq_find
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
#align list.mem_lookup_iff List.mem_dlookup_iff
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
#align list.perm_lookup List.perm_dlookup
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
#align list.lookup_ext List.lookup_ext
def lookupAll (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (β a)
| [] => []
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then Eq.recOn h b :: lookupAll a l else lookupAll a l
#align list.lookup_all List.lookupAll
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_nil (a : α) : lookupAll a [] = @nil (β a) :=
rfl
#align list.lookup_all_nil List.lookupAll_nil
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookupAll a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = b :: lookupAll a l :=
dif_pos rfl
#align list.lookup_all_cons_eq List.lookupAll_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookupAll a (s :: l) = lookupAll a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
#align list.lookup_all_cons_ne List.lookupAll_cons_ne
theorem lookupAll_eq_nil {a : α} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, lookupAll a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp only [lookupAll_cons_eq, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and, not_or,
false_iff, not_forall, not_and, not_not]
use b
simp
· simp [h, lookupAll_eq_nil]
#align list.lookup_all_eq_nil List.lookupAll_eq_nil
theorem head?_lookupAll (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), head? (lookupAll a l) = dlookup a l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h; simp
· rw [lookupAll_cons_ne, dlookup_cons_ne, head?_lookupAll a l] <;> assumption
#align list.head_lookup_all List.head?_lookupAll
theorem mem_lookupAll {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ lookupAll a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
· simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
#align list.mem_lookup_all List.mem_lookupAll
theorem lookupAll_sublist (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (lookupAll a l).map (Sigma.mk a) <+ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp only [ne_eq, not_true, lookupAll_cons_eq, List.map]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons₂ _
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, lookupAll_cons_ne]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons _
#align list.lookup_all_sublist List.lookupAll_sublist
theorem lookupAll_length_le_one (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
length (lookupAll a l) ≤ 1 := by
have := Nodup.sublist ((lookupAll_sublist a l).map _) h
rw [map_map] at this
rwa [← nodup_replicate, ← map_const]
#align list.lookup_all_length_le_one List.lookupAll_length_le_one
theorem lookupAll_eq_dlookup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
lookupAll a l = (dlookup a l).toList := by
rw [← head?_lookupAll]
have h1 := lookupAll_length_le_one a h; revert h1
rcases lookupAll a l with (_ | ⟨b, _ | ⟨c, l⟩⟩) <;> intro h1 <;> try rfl
exact absurd h1 (by simp)
#align list.lookup_all_eq_lookup List.lookupAll_eq_dlookup
theorem lookupAll_nodup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) : (lookupAll a l).Nodup := by
(rw [lookupAll_eq_dlookup a h]; apply Option.toList_nodup)
#align list.lookup_all_nodup List.lookupAll_nodup
theorem perm_lookupAll (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookupAll a l₁ = lookupAll a l₂ := by
simp [lookupAll_eq_dlookup, nd₁, nd₂, perm_dlookup a nd₁ nd₂ p]
#align list.perm_lookup_all List.perm_lookupAll
def kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
lookmap fun s => if a = s.1 then some ⟨a, b⟩ else none
#align list.kreplace List.kreplace
theorem kreplace_of_forall_not (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)}
(H : ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l) : kreplace a b l = l :=
lookmap_of_forall_not _ <| by
rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h; dsimp; split_ifs
· subst a'
exact H _ h
· rfl
#align list.kreplace_of_forall_not List.kreplace_of_forall_not
theorem kreplace_self {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) : kreplace a b l = l := by
refine (lookmap_congr ?_).trans (lookmap_id' (Option.guard fun (s : Sigma β) => a = s.1) ?_ _)
· rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h'
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· subst a'
simp [nd.eq_of_mk_mem h h']
· rfl
· rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· simp
· rintro ⟨⟩
#align list.kreplace_self List.kreplace_self
theorem keys_kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (kreplace a b l).keys = l.keys :=
lookmap_map_eq _ _ <| by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₂⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with h <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [h]
#align list.keys_kreplace List.keys_kreplace
theorem kreplace_nodupKeys (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)} :
(kreplace a b l).NodupKeys ↔ l.NodupKeys := by simp [NodupKeys, keys_kreplace]
#align list.kreplace_nodupkeys List.kreplace_nodupKeys
theorem Perm.kreplace {a : α} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l₁.NodupKeys) :
l₁ ~ l₂ → kreplace a b l₁ ~ kreplace a b l₂ :=
perm_lookmap _ <| by
refine nd.pairwise_ne.imp ?_
intro x y h z h₁ w h₂
split_ifs at h₁ h₂ with h_2 h_1 <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂
exact (h (h_2.symm.trans h_1)).elim
#align list.perm.kreplace List.Perm.kreplace
def kerase (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
eraseP fun s => a = s.1
#align list.kerase List.kerase
-- Porting note (#10618): removing @[simp], `simp` can prove it
theorem kerase_nil {a} : @kerase _ β _ a [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.kerase_nil List.kerase_nil
@[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_eq {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a = s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = l := by simp [kerase, h]
#align list.kerase_cons_eq List.kerase_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_ne {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ≠ s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = s :: kerase a l := by simp [kerase, h]
#align list.kerase_cons_ne List.kerase_cons_ne
@[simp]
theorem kerase_of_not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∉ l.keys) : kerase a l = l := by
induction' l with _ _ ih <;> [rfl; (simp [not_or] at h; simp [h.1, ih h.2])]
#align list.kerase_of_not_mem_keys List.kerase_of_not_mem_keys
theorem kerase_sublist (a : α) (l : List (Sigma β)) : kerase a l <+ l :=
eraseP_sublist _
#align list.kerase_sublist List.kerase_sublist
theorem kerase_keys_subset (a) (l : List (Sigma β)) : (kerase a l).keys ⊆ l.keys :=
((kerase_sublist a l).map _).subset
#align list.kerase_keys_subset List.kerase_keys_subset
theorem mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase {a₁ a₂} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
a₁ ∈ (kerase a₂ l).keys → a₁ ∈ l.keys :=
@kerase_keys_subset _ _ _ _ _ _
#align list.mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase List.mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase
theorem exists_of_kerase {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ (b : β a) (l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)),
a ∉ l₁.keys ∧ l = l₁ ++ ⟨a, b⟩ :: l₂ ∧ kerase a l = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
induction l with
| nil => cases h
| cons hd tl ih =>
by_cases e : a = hd.1
· subst e
exact ⟨hd.2, [], tl, by simp, by cases hd; rfl, by simp⟩
· simp only [keys_cons, mem_cons] at h
cases' h with h h
· exact absurd h e
rcases ih h with ⟨b, tl₁, tl₂, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
exact ⟨b, hd :: tl₁, tl₂, not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem e h₁, by (rw [h₂]; rfl), by
simp [e, h₃]⟩
#align list.exists_of_kerase List.exists_of_kerase
@[simp]
theorem mem_keys_kerase_of_ne {a₁ a₂} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a₁ ≠ a₂) :
a₁ ∈ (kerase a₂ l).keys ↔ a₁ ∈ l.keys :=
(Iff.intro mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase) fun p =>
if q : a₂ ∈ l.keys then
match l, kerase a₂ l, exists_of_kerase q, p with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, rfl⟩, p => by simpa [keys, h] using p
else by simp [q, p]
#align list.mem_keys_kerase_of_ne List.mem_keys_kerase_of_ne
theorem keys_kerase {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (kerase a l).keys = l.keys.erase a := by
rw [keys, kerase, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_map, Function.comp]
simp only [beq_eq_decide]
congr
funext
simp
#align list.keys_kerase List.keys_kerase
theorem kerase_kerase {a a'} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
(kerase a' l).kerase a = (kerase a l).kerase a' := by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'; rfl
induction' l with x xs
· rfl
· by_cases a' = x.1
· subst a'
simp [kerase_cons_ne h, kerase_cons_eq rfl]
by_cases h' : a = x.1
· subst a
simp [kerase_cons_eq rfl, kerase_cons_ne (Ne.symm h)]
· simp [kerase_cons_ne, *]
#align list.kerase_kerase List.kerase_kerase
theorem NodupKeys.kerase (a : α) : NodupKeys l → (kerase a l).NodupKeys :=
NodupKeys.sublist <| kerase_sublist _ _
#align list.nodupkeys.kerase List.NodupKeys.kerase
theorem Perm.kerase {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l₁.NodupKeys) :
l₁ ~ l₂ → kerase a l₁ ~ kerase a l₂ := by
apply Perm.eraseP
apply (nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp
intros; simp_all
#align list.perm.kerase List.Perm.kerase
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_keys_kerase (a) {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
a ∉ (kerase a l).keys := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl ih =>
simp? at nd says simp only [nodupKeys_cons] at nd
by_cases h : a = hd.1
· subst h
simp [nd.1]
· simp [h, ih nd.2]
#align list.not_mem_keys_kerase List.not_mem_keys_kerase
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_kerase (a) {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
dlookup a (kerase a l) = none :=
dlookup_eq_none.mpr (not_mem_keys_kerase a nd)
#align list.lookup_kerase List.dlookup_kerase
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_kerase_ne {a a'} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ≠ a') :
dlookup a (kerase a' l) = dlookup a l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
cases' hd with ah bh
by_cases h₁ : a = ah <;> by_cases h₂ : a' = ah
· substs h₁ h₂
cases Ne.irrefl h
· subst h₁
simp [h₂]
· subst h₂
simp [h]
· simp [h₁, h₂, ih]
#align list.lookup_kerase_ne List.dlookup_kerase_ne
theorem kerase_append_left {a} :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}, a ∈ l₁.keys → kerase a (l₁ ++ l₂) = kerase a l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _, h => by cases h
| s :: l₁, l₂, h₁ => by
if h₂ : a = s.1 then simp [h₂]
else simp at h₁; cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁ <;> [exact absurd h₁ h₂; simp [h₂, kerase_append_left h₁]]
#align list.kerase_append_left List.kerase_append_left
theorem kerase_append_right {a} :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}, a ∉ l₁.keys → kerase a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ kerase a l₂
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _ :: l₁, l₂, h => by
simp only [keys_cons, mem_cons, not_or] at h
simp [h.1, kerase_append_right h.2]
#align list.kerase_append_right List.kerase_append_right
theorem kerase_comm (a₁ a₂) (l : List (Sigma β)) :
kerase a₂ (kerase a₁ l) = kerase a₁ (kerase a₂ l) :=
if h : a₁ = a₂ then by simp [h]
else
if ha₁ : a₁ ∈ l.keys then
if ha₂ : a₂ ∈ l.keys then
match l, kerase a₁ l, exists_of_kerase ha₁, ha₂ with
| _, _, ⟨b₁, l₁, l₂, a₁_nin_l₁, rfl, rfl⟩, _ =>
if h' : a₂ ∈ l₁.keys then by
simp [kerase_append_left h',
kerase_append_right (mt (mem_keys_kerase_of_ne h).mp a₁_nin_l₁)]
else by
simp [kerase_append_right h', kerase_append_right a₁_nin_l₁,
@kerase_cons_ne _ _ _ a₂ ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ _ (Ne.symm h)]
else by simp [ha₂, mt mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase ha₂]
else by simp [ha₁, mt mem_keys_of_mem_keys_kerase ha₁]
#align list.kerase_comm List.kerase_comm
theorem sizeOf_kerase [DecidableEq α] [SizeOf (Sigma β)] (x : α)
(xs : List (Sigma β)) : SizeOf.sizeOf (List.kerase x xs) ≤ SizeOf.sizeOf xs := by
simp only [SizeOf.sizeOf, _sizeOf_1]
induction' xs with y ys
· simp
· by_cases x = y.1 <;> simp [*]
#align list.sizeof_kerase List.sizeOf_kerase
def kinsert (a : α) (b : β a) (l : List (Sigma β)) : List (Sigma β) :=
⟨a, b⟩ :: kerase a l
#align list.kinsert List.kinsert
@[simp]
theorem kinsert_def {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : kinsert a b l = ⟨a, b⟩ :: kerase a l :=
rfl
#align list.kinsert_def List.kinsert_def
theorem mem_keys_kinsert {a a'} {b' : β a'} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
a ∈ (kinsert a' b' l).keys ↔ a = a' ∨ a ∈ l.keys := by by_cases h : a = a' <;> simp [h]
#align list.mem_keys_kinsert List.mem_keys_kinsert
theorem kinsert_nodupKeys (a) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
(kinsert a b l).NodupKeys :=
nodupKeys_cons.mpr ⟨not_mem_keys_kerase a nd, nd.kerase a⟩
#align list.kinsert_nodupkeys List.kinsert_nodupKeys
theorem Perm.kinsert {a} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
kinsert a b l₁ ~ kinsert a b l₂ :=
(p.kerase nd₁).cons _
#align list.perm.kinsert List.Perm.kinsert
theorem dlookup_kinsert {a} {b : β a} (l : List (Sigma β)) :
dlookup a (kinsert a b l) = some b := by
simp only [kinsert, dlookup_cons_eq]
#align list.lookup_kinsert List.dlookup_kinsert
theorem dlookup_kinsert_ne {a a'} {b' : β a'} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ≠ a') :
dlookup a (kinsert a' b' l) = dlookup a l := by simp [h]
#align list.lookup_kinsert_ne List.dlookup_kinsert_ne
def kextract (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a) × List (Sigma β)
| [] => (none, [])
| s :: l =>
if h : s.1 = a then (some (Eq.recOn h s.2), l)
else
let (b', l') := kextract a l
(b', s :: l')
#align list.kextract List.kextract
@[simp]
theorem kextract_eq_dlookup_kerase (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), kextract a l = (dlookup a l, kerase a l)
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
simp only [kextract]; dsimp; split_ifs with h
· subst a'
simp [kerase]
· simp [kextract, Ne.symm h, kextract_eq_dlookup_kerase a l, kerase]
#align list.kextract_eq_lookup_kerase List.kextract_eq_dlookup_kerase
def dedupKeys : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
List.foldr (fun x => kinsert x.1 x.2) []
#align list.dedupkeys List.dedupKeys
theorem dedupKeys_cons {x : Sigma β} (l : List (Sigma β)) :
dedupKeys (x :: l) = kinsert x.1 x.2 (dedupKeys l) :=
rfl
#align list.dedupkeys_cons List.dedupKeys_cons
theorem nodupKeys_dedupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : NodupKeys (dedupKeys l) := by
dsimp [dedupKeys]
generalize hl : nil = l'
have : NodupKeys l' := by
rw [← hl]
apply nodup_nil
clear hl
induction' l with x xs l_ih
· apply this
· cases x
simp only [foldr_cons, kinsert_def, nodupKeys_cons, ne_eq, not_true]
constructor
· simp only [keys_kerase]
apply l_ih.not_mem_erase
· exact l_ih.kerase _
#align list.nodupkeys_dedupkeys List.nodupKeys_dedupKeys
theorem dlookup_dedupKeys (a : α) (l : List (Sigma β)) : dlookup a (dedupKeys l) = dlookup a l := by
induction' l with l_hd _ l_ih
· rfl
cases' l_hd with a' b
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
rw [dedupKeys_cons, dlookup_kinsert, dlookup_cons_eq]
· rw [dedupKeys_cons, dlookup_kinsert_ne h, l_ih, dlookup_cons_ne]
exact h
#align list.lookup_dedupkeys List.dlookup_dedupKeys
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 671 | 679 | theorem sizeOf_dedupKeys [DecidableEq α] [SizeOf (Sigma β)]
(xs : List (Sigma β)) : SizeOf.sizeOf (dedupKeys xs) ≤ SizeOf.sizeOf xs := by |
simp only [SizeOf.sizeOf, _sizeOf_1]
induction' xs with x xs
· simp [dedupKeys]
· simp only [dedupKeys_cons, kinsert_def, Nat.add_le_add_iff_left, Sigma.eta]
trans
· apply sizeOf_kerase
· assumption
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Basic
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.trailing_degree from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"302eab4f46abb63de520828de78c04cb0f9b5836"
noncomputable section
open Function Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
def trailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ∞ :=
p.support.min
#align polynomial.trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => trailingDegree p < trailingDegree q :=
InvImage.wf trailingDegree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_lt_wf Polynomial.trailingDegree_lt_wf
def natTrailingDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(trailingDegree p).getD 0
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree
def trailingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natTrailingDegree p)
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff Polynomial.trailingCoeff
def TrailingMonic (p : R[X]) :=
trailingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.trailing_monic Polynomial.TrailingMonic
theorem TrailingMonic.def : TrailingMonic p ↔ trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.def Polynomial.TrailingMonic.def
instance TrailingMonic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (TrailingMonic p) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Decidable (trailingCoeff p = (1 : R))
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.decidable Polynomial.TrailingMonic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.TrailingMonic) : trailingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.trailing_monic.trailing_coeff Polynomial.TrailingMonic.trailingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_zero : trailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem trailingCoeff_zero : trailingCoeff (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_coeff_zero Polynomial.trailingCoeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_zero : natTrailingDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_zero
theorem trailingDegree_eq_top : trailingDegree p = ⊤ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.min_eq_top.1 h), fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_top Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_top
theorem trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree p = (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ :=
not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt trailingDegree_eq_top.1 hp))
have hn : trailingDegree p = n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natTrailingDegree, hn]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact WithTop.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.trailingDegree = n ↔ p.natTrailingDegree = n := by
constructor
· intro H
rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [trailingDegree_zero] at H
exact Option.noConfusion H
· intro H
rwa [trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq]
rintro rfl
rw [natTrailingDegree_zero] at H
rw [H] at hn
exact lt_irrefl _ hn
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_eq_iff_nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(h : trailingDegree p = n) : natTrailingDegree p = n :=
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := fun hp0 => by rw [hp0] at h; exact Option.noConfusion h
Option.some_inj.1 <|
show (natTrailingDegree p : ℕ∞) = n by rwa [← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp0]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree : ↑(natTrailingDegree p) ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, trailingDegree_zero]
exact le_top
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]}
(h : trailingDegree p = trailingDegree q) : natTrailingDegree p = natTrailingDegree q := by
unfold natTrailingDegree
rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_eq_of_trailing_degree_eq Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_eq_of_trailingDegree_eq
theorem trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : trailingDegree p ≤ n :=
show @LE.le ℕ∞ _ p.support.min n from min_le (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree p ≤ n := by
have : WithTop.some (natTrailingDegree p) = Nat.cast (natTrailingDegree p) := rfl
rw [← WithTop.coe_le_coe, this, ← trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree]
· exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
· intro h
subst h
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_ne_zero Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro h
by_contra hp
obtain ⟨n, hpn, hn⟩ := by simpa using min_mem_image_coe $ support_nonempty.2 hp
obtain rfl := (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).1 hn.symm
exact hpn h
· rintro rfl
simp
lemma coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : coeff p p.natTrailingDegree ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
coeff_natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not
@[simp] lemma natTrailingDegree_eq_zero : natTrailingDegree p = 0 ↔ p = 0 ∨ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
constructor
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
rintro h hp
rwa [← h, coeff_natTrailingDegree_ne_zero]
· rintro (rfl | h)
· simp
· exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 $ natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
lemma trailingDegree_eq_zero : trailingDegree p = 0 ↔ coeff p 0 ≠ 0 := by
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [WithTop.top_ne_zero (α := ℕ)]
· exact (trailingDegree_eq_iff_natTrailingDegree_eq hp).trans $
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.trans $ or_iff_right hp
lemma natTrailingDegree_ne_zero : natTrailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_eq_zero.not.trans $ by rw [not_or, not_ne_iff]
lemma trailingDegree_ne_zero : trailingDegree p ≠ 0 ↔ coeff p 0 = 0 :=
trailingDegree_eq_zero.not_left
@[simp] theorem trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree (h : coeff q (natTrailingDegree p) ≠ 0) :
trailingDegree q ≤ trailingDegree p := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp]
exact le_top
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp]
exact trailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_le_trailing_degree Polynomial.trailingDegree_le_trailingDegree
theorem trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne {n : ℕ} :
p.natTrailingDegree ≠ n → trailingDegree p ≠ n := by
-- Porting note: Needed to account for different coercion behaviour & add the lemma below
have : Nat.cast n = WithTop.some n := rfl
exact mt fun h => by rw [natTrailingDegree, h, this, ← WithTop.some_eq_coe, Option.getD_some]
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_ne_of_nat_trailing_degree_ne Polynomial.trailingDegree_ne_of_natTrailingDegree_ne
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le {n : ℕ} {hp : p ≠ 0}
(H : (n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree p) : n ≤ natTrailingDegree p := by
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp] at H
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp H
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_of_trailing_degree_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_of_trailingDegree_le
theorem natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree {hq : q ≠ 0}
(hpq : p.trailingDegree ≤ q.trailingDegree) : p.natTrailingDegree ≤ q.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0;
· rw [hp, natTrailingDegree_zero]
exact zero_le _
rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq] at hpq
exact WithTop.coe_le_coe.1 hpq
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_le_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_le_natTrailingDegree
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [trailingDegree, support_monomial n ha, min_singleton]
rfl
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.trailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [natTrailingDegree, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial
theorem natTrailingDegree_monomial_le : natTrailingDegree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (natTrailingDegree_monomial ha).le
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
theorem le_trailingDegree_monomial : ↑n ≤ trailingDegree (monomial n a) :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if ha : a = 0 then by simp [ha] else (trailingDegree_monomial ha).ge
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_monomial Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a) = (0 : ℕ∞) :=
trailingDegree_monomial ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C Polynomial.trailingDegree_C
theorem le_trailingDegree_C : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a) :=
le_trailingDegree_monomial
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.le_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.le_trailingDegree_C
theorem trailingDegree_one_le : (0 : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (1 : R[X]) := by
rw [← C_1]
exact le_trailingDegree_C
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_one_le Polynomial.trailingDegree_one_le
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_C (a : R) : natTrailingDegree (C a) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 natTrailingDegree_monomial_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_C Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_one : natTrailingDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natTrailingDegree_C 1
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_one Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem natTrailingDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natTrailingDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natTrailingDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_trailing_degree_nat_cast Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natTrailingDegree_nat_cast := natTrailingDegree_natCast
@[simp]
theorem trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, trailingDegree_monomial ha]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/TrailingDegree.lean | 294 | 297 | theorem le_trailingDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) :
(n : ℕ∞) ≤ trailingDegree (C a * X ^ n) := by |
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
exact le_trailingDegree_monomial
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
#align_import analysis.normed.mul_action from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
variable {α β : Type*}
section SeminormedAddGroup
variable [SeminormedAddGroup α] [SeminormedAddGroup β] [SMulZeroClass α β]
variable [BoundedSMul α β]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/MulAction.lean | 29 | 30 | theorem norm_smul_le (r : α) (x : β) : ‖r • x‖ ≤ ‖r‖ * ‖x‖ := by |
simpa [smul_zero] using dist_smul_pair r 0 x
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ p₁ p₂ : P}
nonrec def angle (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) (p3 -ᵥ p2)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle EuclideanGeometry.angle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp
((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_angle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_angle
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 61 | 64 | theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by |
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.IsFreeGroup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
#align_import group_theory.free_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9114ddffa023340c9ec86965e00cdd6fe26fcdf6"
open Set
variable {ι : Type*} (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, Monoid (M i)]
inductive Monoid.CoprodI.Rel : FreeMonoid (Σi, M i) → FreeMonoid (Σi, M i) → Prop
| of_one (i : ι) : Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, 1⟩) 1
| of_mul {i : ι} (x y : M i) :
Monoid.CoprodI.Rel (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x⟩ * FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, y⟩) (FreeMonoid.of ⟨i, x * y⟩)
#align free_product.rel Monoid.CoprodI.Rel
def Monoid.CoprodI : Type _ := (conGen (Monoid.CoprodI.Rel M)).Quotient
#align free_product Monoid.CoprodI
-- Porting note: could not de derived
instance : Monoid (Monoid.CoprodI M) := by
delta Monoid.CoprodI; infer_instance
instance : Inhabited (Monoid.CoprodI M) :=
⟨1⟩
namespace Monoid.CoprodI
@[ext]
structure Word where
toList : List (Σi, M i)
ne_one : ∀ l ∈ toList, Sigma.snd l ≠ 1
chain_ne : toList.Chain' fun l l' => Sigma.fst l ≠ Sigma.fst l'
#align free_product.word Monoid.CoprodI.Word
variable {M}
def of {i : ι} : M i →* CoprodI M where
toFun x := Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i x)
map_one' := (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_one i))
map_mul' x y := Eq.symm <| (Con.eq _).mpr (ConGen.Rel.of _ _ (CoprodI.Rel.of_mul x y))
#align free_product.of Monoid.CoprodI.of
theorem of_apply {i} (m : M i) : of m = Con.mk' _ (FreeMonoid.of <| Sigma.mk i m) :=
rfl
#align free_product.of_apply Monoid.CoprodI.of_apply
variable {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
-- Porting note: higher `ext` priority
@[ext 1100]
theorem ext_hom (f g : CoprodI M →* N) (h : ∀ i, f.comp (of : M i →* _) = g.comp of) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
FreeMonoid.hom_eq fun ⟨i, x⟩ => by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, ← of_apply, ← MonoidHom.comp_apply, ←
MonoidHom.comp_apply, h]; rfl
#align free_product.ext_hom Monoid.CoprodI.ext_hom
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift : (∀ i, M i →* N) ≃ (CoprodI M →* N) where
toFun fi :=
Con.lift _ (FreeMonoid.lift fun p : Σi, M i => fi p.fst p.snd) <|
Con.conGen_le <| by
simp_rw [Con.ker_rel]
rintro _ _ (i | ⟨x, y⟩)
· change FreeMonoid.lift _ (FreeMonoid.of _) = FreeMonoid.lift _ 1
simp only [MonoidHom.map_one, FreeMonoid.lift_eval_of]
· change
FreeMonoid.lift _ (FreeMonoid.of _ * FreeMonoid.of _) =
FreeMonoid.lift _ (FreeMonoid.of _)
simp only [MonoidHom.map_mul, FreeMonoid.lift_eval_of]
invFun f i := f.comp of
left_inv := by
intro fi
ext i x
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [MonoidHom.comp_apply, of_apply, Con.lift_mk', FreeMonoid.lift_eval_of]
right_inv := by
intro f
ext i x
rfl
#align free_product.lift Monoid.CoprodI.lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) i : (lift fi).comp of = fi i :=
congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_apply fi) i
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {N} [Monoid N] (fi : ∀ i, M i →* N) {i} (m : M i) : lift fi (of m) = fi i m :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_of ..) m
#align free_product.lift_of Monoid.CoprodI.lift_of
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of' {N} [Monoid N] (f : CoprodI M →* N) :
lift (fun i ↦ f.comp (of (i := i))) = f :=
lift.apply_symm_apply f
@[simp]
theorem lift_of' : lift (fun i ↦ (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = .id (CoprodI M) :=
lift_comp_of' (.id _)
theorem of_leftInverse [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
Function.LeftInverse (lift <| Pi.mulSingle i (MonoidHom.id (M i))) of := fun x => by
simp only [lift_of, Pi.mulSingle_eq_same, MonoidHom.id_apply]
#align free_product.of_left_inverse Monoid.CoprodI.of_leftInverse
theorem of_injective (i : ι) : Function.Injective (of : M i →* _) := by
classical exact (of_leftInverse i).injective
#align free_product.of_injective Monoid.CoprodI.of_injective
theorem mrange_eq_iSup {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) = ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) := by
rw [lift, Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Con.lift_range, FreeMonoid.mrange_lift,
range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
simp only [MonoidHom.mclosure_range]
#align free_product.mrange_eq_supr Monoid.CoprodI.mrange_eq_iSup
theorem lift_mrange_le {N} [Monoid N] (f : ∀ i, M i →* N) {s : Submonoid N} :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f) ≤ s ↔ ∀ i, MonoidHom.mrange (f i) ≤ s := by
simp [mrange_eq_iSup]
#align free_product.lift_mrange_le Monoid.CoprodI.lift_mrange_le
@[simp]
theorem iSup_mrange_of : ⨆ i, MonoidHom.mrange (of : M i →* CoprodI M) = ⊤ := by
simp [← mrange_eq_iSup]
@[simp]
theorem mclosure_iUnion_range_of :
Submonoid.closure (⋃ i, Set.range (of : M i →* CoprodI M)) = ⊤ := by
simp [Submonoid.closure_iUnion]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_left {C : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (one : C 1)
(mul : ∀ {i} (m : M i) x, C x → C (of m * x)) : C m := by
induction m using Submonoid.induction_of_closure_eq_top_left mclosure_iUnion_range_of with
| one => exact one
| mul x hx y ihy =>
obtain ⟨i, m, rfl⟩ : ∃ (i : ι) (m : M i), of m = x := by simpa using hx
exact mul m y ihy
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : CoprodI M → Prop} (m : CoprodI M) (h_one : C 1)
(h_of : ∀ (i) (m : M i), C (of m)) (h_mul : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C m := by
induction m using CoprodI.induction_left with
| one => exact h_one
| mul m x hx => exact h_mul _ _ (h_of _ _) hx
#align free_product.induction_on Monoid.CoprodI.induction_on
namespace Word
@[simps]
def empty : Word M where
toList := []
ne_one := by simp
chain_ne := List.chain'_nil
#align free_product.word.empty Monoid.CoprodI.Word.empty
instance : Inhabited (Word M) :=
⟨empty⟩
def prod (w : Word M) : CoprodI M :=
List.prod (w.toList.map fun l => of l.snd)
#align free_product.word.prod Monoid.CoprodI.Word.prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : prod (empty : Word M) = 1 :=
rfl
#align free_product.word.prod_empty Monoid.CoprodI.Word.prod_empty
def fstIdx (w : Word M) : Option ι :=
w.toList.head?.map Sigma.fst
#align free_product.word.fst_idx Monoid.CoprodI.Word.fstIdx
theorem fstIdx_ne_iff {w : Word M} {i} :
fstIdx w ≠ some i ↔ ∀ l ∈ w.toList.head?, i ≠ Sigma.fst l :=
not_iff_not.mp <| by simp [fstIdx]
#align free_product.word.fst_idx_ne_iff Monoid.CoprodI.Word.fstIdx_ne_iff
variable (M)
@[ext]
structure Pair (i : ι) where
head : M i
tail : Word M
fstIdx_ne : fstIdx tail ≠ some i
#align free_product.word.pair Monoid.CoprodI.Word.Pair
instance (i : ι) : Inhabited (Pair M i) :=
⟨⟨1, empty, by tauto⟩⟩
variable {M}
variable [∀ i, DecidableEq (M i)]
@[simps]
def cons {i} (m : M i) (w : Word M) (hmw : w.fstIdx ≠ some i) (h1 : m ≠ 1) : Word M :=
{ toList := ⟨i, m⟩ :: w.toList,
ne_one := by
simp only [List.mem_cons]
rintro l (rfl | hl)
· exact h1
· exact w.ne_one l hl
chain_ne := w.chain_ne.cons' (fstIdx_ne_iff.mp hmw) }
def rcons {i} (p : Pair M i) : Word M :=
if h : p.head = 1 then p.tail
else cons p.head p.tail p.fstIdx_ne h
#align free_product.word.rcons Monoid.CoprodI.Word.rcons
#noalign free_product.word.cons_eq_rcons
@[simp]
theorem prod_rcons {i} (p : Pair M i) : prod (rcons p) = of p.head * prod p.tail :=
if hm : p.head = 1 then by rw [rcons, dif_pos hm, hm, MonoidHom.map_one, one_mul]
else by rw [rcons, dif_neg hm, cons, prod, List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, prod]
#align free_product.word.prod_rcons Monoid.CoprodI.Word.prod_rcons
theorem rcons_inj {i} : Function.Injective (rcons : Pair M i → Word M) := by
rintro ⟨m, w, h⟩ ⟨m', w', h'⟩ he
by_cases hm : m = 1 <;> by_cases hm' : m' = 1
· simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm, dif_pos hm'] at he
aesop
· exfalso
simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm, dif_neg hm'] at he
rw [he] at h
exact h rfl
· exfalso
simp only [rcons, dif_pos hm', dif_neg hm] at he
rw [← he] at h'
exact h' rfl
· have : m = m' ∧ w.toList = w'.toList := by
simpa [cons, rcons, dif_neg hm, dif_neg hm', true_and_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
heq_iff_eq, ← Subtype.ext_iff_val] using he
rcases this with ⟨rfl, h⟩
congr
exact Word.ext _ _ h
#align free_product.word.rcons_inj Monoid.CoprodI.Word.rcons_inj
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/CoprodI.lean | 393 | 403 | theorem mem_rcons_iff {i j : ι} (p : Pair M i) (m : M j) :
⟨_, m⟩ ∈ (rcons p).toList ↔ ⟨_, m⟩ ∈ p.tail.toList ∨
m ≠ 1 ∧ (∃ h : i = j, m = h ▸ p.head) := by |
simp only [rcons, cons, ne_eq]
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst i
by_cases hm : m = p.head
· subst m
split_ifs <;> simp_all
· split_ifs <;> simp_all
· split_ifs <;> simp_all [Ne.symm hij]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import linear_algebra.quadratic_form.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d11f435d4e34a6cea0a1797d6b625b0c170be845"
universe u v w
variable {S T : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {M N : Type*}
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
section Polar
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M]
namespace QuadraticForm
def polar (f : M → R) (x y : M) :=
f (x + y) - f x - f y
#align quadratic_form.polar QuadraticForm.polar
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Basic.lean | 98 | 100 | theorem polar_add (f g : M → R) (x y : M) : polar (f + g) x y = polar f x y + polar g x y := by |
simp only [polar, Pi.add_apply]
abel
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Cardinal
variable {α : Type u} {c d : Cardinal.{u}}
noncomputable def toNat : Cardinal →*₀ ℕ :=
ENat.toNat.comp toENat
#align cardinal.to_nat Cardinal.toNat
#align cardinal.to_nat_hom Cardinal.toNat
@[simp] lemma toNat_toENat (a : Cardinal) : ENat.toNat (toENat a) = toNat a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) : toNat n = ENat.toNat n :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| toENat_ofENat n
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem toNat_natCast (n : ℕ) : toNat n = n := toNat_ofENat n
@[simp]
lemma toNat_eq_zero : toNat c = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
rw [← toNat_toENat, ENat.toNat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_top]
lemma toNat_ne_zero : toNat c ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := by simp [not_or]
@[simp] lemma toNat_pos : 0 < toNat c ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := pos_iff_ne_zero.trans toNat_ne_zero
theorem cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ↑(toNat c) = c := by
lift c to ℕ using h
rw [toNat_natCast]
#align cardinal.cast_to_nat_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0
theorem toNat_apply_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) :
toNat c = Classical.choose (lt_aleph0.1 h) :=
Nat.cast_injective <| by rw [cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 h, ← Classical.choose_spec (lt_aleph0.1 h)]
#align cardinal.to_nat_apply_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_apply_of_lt_aleph0
theorem toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : toNat c = 0 := by simp [h]
#align cardinal.to_nat_apply_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ToNat.lean | 60 | 61 | theorem cast_toNat_of_aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : ↑(toNat c) = (0 : Cardinal) := by |
rw [toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le h, Nat.cast_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
#align_import linear_algebra.vandermonde from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
open Equiv Finset
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
def vandermonde {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n → R) : Matrix (Fin n) (Fin n) R := fun i j => v i ^ (j : ℕ)
#align matrix.vandermonde Matrix.vandermonde
@[simp]
theorem vandermonde_apply {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n → R) (i j) : vandermonde v i j = v i ^ (j : ℕ) :=
rfl
#align matrix.vandermonde_apply Matrix.vandermonde_apply
@[simp]
theorem vandermonde_cons {n : ℕ} (v0 : R) (v : Fin n → R) :
vandermonde (Fin.cons v0 v : Fin n.succ → R) =
Fin.cons (fun (j : Fin n.succ) => v0 ^ (j : ℕ)) fun i => Fin.cons 1
fun j => v i * vandermonde v i j := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases (by simp) (fun i => ?_) i
refine Fin.cases (by simp) (fun j => ?_) j
simp [pow_succ']
#align matrix.vandermonde_cons Matrix.vandermonde_cons
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Vandermonde.lean | 59 | 64 | theorem vandermonde_succ {n : ℕ} (v : Fin n.succ → R) :
vandermonde v =
Fin.cons (fun (j : Fin n.succ) => v 0 ^ (j : ℕ)) fun i =>
Fin.cons 1 fun j => v i.succ * vandermonde (Fin.tail v) i j := by |
conv_lhs => rw [← Fin.cons_self_tail v, vandermonde_cons]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
#align_import linear_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
open Function
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*} {K₂ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
def range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align linear_map.range LinearMap.range
theorem range_coe [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : (range f : Set M₂) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_coe LinearMap.range_coe
theorem range_toAddSubmonoid [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
f.range.toAddSubmonoid = AddMonoidHom.mrange f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_to_add_submonoid LinearMap.range_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem mem_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.mem_range LinearMap.mem_range
theorem range_eq_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : range f = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
#align linear_map.range_eq_map LinearMap.range_eq_map
theorem mem_range_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (x : M) : f x ∈ range f :=
⟨x, rfl⟩
#align linear_map.mem_range_self LinearMap.mem_range_self
@[simp]
theorem range_id : range (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.range_id
#align linear_map.range_id LinearMap.range_id
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃]
(f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = map g (range f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
#align linear_map.range_comp LinearMap.range_comp
theorem range_comp_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) ≤ range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
#align linear_map.range_comp_le_range LinearMap.range_comp_le_range
theorem range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} : range f = ⊤ ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, Set.range_iff_surjective]
#align linear_map.range_eq_top LinearMap.range_eq_top
theorem range_le_iff_comap [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
#align linear_map.range_le_iff_comap LinearMap.range_le_iff_comap
theorem map_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset_range f p)
#align linear_map.map_le_range LinearMap.map_le_range
@[simp]
theorem range_neg {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : LinearMap.range (-f) = LinearMap.range f := by
change range ((-LinearMap.id : M₂ →ₗ[R₂] M₂).comp f) = _
rw [range_comp, Submodule.map_neg, Submodule.map_id]
#align linear_map.range_neg LinearMap.range_neg
lemma range_domRestrict_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (S : Submodule R M) :
LinearMap.range (f.domRestrict S) ≤ LinearMap.range f := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, rfl⟩
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self f y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_range {M M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M]
[AddCommGroup M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
LinearMap.range f.toIntLinearMap = AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule f.range := rfl
lemma _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_le [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : p ≤ LinearMap.range f) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset h
end
@[simps]
def iterateRange (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ℕ →o (Submodule R M)ᵒᵈ where
toFun n := LinearMap.range (f ^ n)
monotone' n m w x h := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp w
rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at h
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := h
rw [LinearMap.mem_range]
use (f ^ c) m
rw [pow_add, LinearMap.mul_apply]
#align linear_map.iterate_range LinearMap.iterateRange
abbrev rangeRestrict [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] LinearMap.range f :=
f.codRestrict (LinearMap.range f) (LinearMap.mem_range_self f)
#align linear_map.range_restrict LinearMap.rangeRestrict
instance fintypeRange [Fintype M] [DecidableEq M₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
#align linear_map.fintype_range LinearMap.fintypeRange
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
theorem range_codRestrict {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomSurjective τ₂₁] (p : Submodule R M)
(f : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) (hf) :
range (codRestrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype (LinearMap.range f) := by
simpa only [range_eq_map] using map_codRestrict _ _ _ _
#align linear_map.range_cod_restrict LinearMap.range_codRestrict
theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (q : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (comap f q) = range f ⊓ q :=
le_antisymm (le_inf map_le_range (map_comap_le _ _)) <| by
rintro _ ⟨⟨x, _, rfl⟩, hx⟩; exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
#align submodule.map_comap_eq Submodule.map_comap_eq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Range.lean | 179 | 180 | theorem _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {q : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : q ≤ range f) : map f (comap f q) = q := by | rwa [Submodule.map_comap_eq, inf_eq_right]
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.FLT.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.PythagoreanTriples
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import number_theory.fermat4 from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10b4e499f43088dd3bb7b5796184ad5216648ab1"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
def Fermat42 (a b c : ℤ) : Prop :=
a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ a ^ 4 + b ^ 4 = c ^ 2
#align fermat_42 Fermat42
theorem Int.coprime_of_sq_sum {r s : ℤ} (h2 : IsCoprime s r) : IsCoprime (r ^ 2 + s ^ 2) r := by
rw [sq, sq]
exact (IsCoprime.mul_left h2 h2).mul_add_left_left r
#align int.coprime_of_sq_sum Int.coprime_of_sq_sum
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/FLT/Four.lean | 159 | 162 | theorem Int.coprime_of_sq_sum' {r s : ℤ} (h : IsCoprime r s) :
IsCoprime (r ^ 2 + s ^ 2) (r * s) := by |
apply IsCoprime.mul_right (Int.coprime_of_sq_sum (isCoprime_comm.mp h))
rw [add_comm]; apply Int.coprime_of_sq_sum h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.pochhammer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"53b216bcc1146df1c4a0a86877890ea9f1f01589"
universe u v
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable (S : Type u) [Semiring S]
noncomputable def ascPochhammer : ℕ → S[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (ascPochhammer n).comp (X + 1)
#align pochhammer ascPochhammer
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero : ascPochhammer S 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pochhammer_zero ascPochhammer_zero
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_one : ascPochhammer S 1 = X := by simp [ascPochhammer]
#align pochhammer_one ascPochhammer_one
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 64 | 66 | theorem ascPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = X * (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by |
rw [ascPochhammer]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.measure.regular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
open Set Filter ENNReal Topology NNReal TopologicalSpace
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
def InnerRegularWRT {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (p q : Set α → Prop) :=
∀ ⦃U⦄, q U → ∀ r < μ U, ∃ K, K ⊆ U ∧ p K ∧ r < μ K
#align measure_theory.measure.inner_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.InnerRegularWRT
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
class OuterRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected outerRegular :
∀ ⦃A : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet A → ∀ r > μ A, ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.outer_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular.outerRegular
class Regular (μ : Measure α) extends IsFiniteMeasureOnCompacts μ, OuterRegular μ : Prop where
innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact IsOpen
#align measure_theory.measure.regular MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
class WeaklyRegular (μ : Measure α) extends OuterRegular μ : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsClosed IsOpen
#align measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular
#align measure_theory.measure.weakly_regular.inner_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.WeaklyRegular.innerRegular
class InnerRegular (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s)
class InnerRegularCompactLTTop (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
protected innerRegular : InnerRegularWRT μ IsCompact (fun s ↦ MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s ≠ ∞)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Regular.weaklyRegular [R1Space α] [Regular μ] :
WeaklyRegular μ where
innerRegular := fun _U hU r hr ↦
let ⟨K, KU, K_comp, hK⟩ := Regular.innerRegular hU r hr
⟨closure K, K_comp.closure_subset_of_isOpen hU KU, isClosed_closure,
hK.trans_le (measure_mono subset_closure)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.regular.weakly_regular MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular.weaklyRegular
namespace OuterRegular
instance zero : OuterRegular (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨fun A _ _r hr => ⟨univ, subset_univ A, isOpen_univ, hr⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.outer_regular.zero MeasureTheory.Measure.OuterRegular.zero
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : μ A < r) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < r := by
rcases OuterRegular.outerRegular (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ A) r
(by rwa [measure_toMeasurable]) with
⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, (subset_toMeasurable _ _).trans hAU, hUo, hU⟩
#align set.exists_is_open_lt_of_lt Set.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt
theorem _root_.Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] :
μ A = ⨅ (U : Set α) (_ : A ⊆ U) (_ : IsOpen U), μ U := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun s hs => le_iInf fun _ => μ.mono hs) ?_
refine le_of_forall_lt' fun r hr => ?_
simpa only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] using A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt r hr
#align set.measure_eq_infi_is_open Set.measure_eq_iInf_isOpen
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add [OuterRegular μ] (A : Set α) (hA : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < μ A + ε :=
A.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ (ENNReal.lt_add_right hA hε)
#align set.exists_is_open_lt_add Set.exists_isOpen_lt_add
theorem _root_.Set.exists_isOpen_le_add (A : Set α) (μ : Measure α) [OuterRegular μ] {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U ≤ μ A + ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne (μ A) ∞ with (H | H)
· exact ⟨univ, subset_univ _, isOpen_univ, by simp only [H, _root_.top_add, le_top]⟩
· rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add H hε with ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU⟩
exact ⟨U, AU, U_open, hU.le⟩
#align set.exists_is_open_le_add Set.exists_isOpen_le_add
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Regular.lean | 369 | 374 | theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.exists_isOpen_diff_lt [OuterRegular μ] {A : Set α}
(hA : MeasurableSet A) (hA' : μ A ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ U, U ⊇ A ∧ IsOpen U ∧ μ U < ∞ ∧ μ (U \ A) < ε := by |
rcases A.exists_isOpen_lt_add hA' hε with ⟨U, hAU, hUo, hU⟩
use U, hAU, hUo, hU.trans_le le_top
exact measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add hA hAU hA' hU
|
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
#align_import order.bounds.order_iso from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a59dad53320b73ef180174aae867addd707ef00e"
set_option autoImplicit true
open Set
namespace OrderIso
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (f : α ≃o β)
theorem upperBounds_image {s : Set α} : upperBounds (f '' s) = f '' upperBounds s :=
Subset.antisymm
(fun x hx =>
⟨f.symm x, fun _ hy => f.le_symm_apply.2 (hx <| mem_image_of_mem _ hy), f.apply_symm_apply x⟩)
f.monotone.image_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_image
#align order_iso.upper_bounds_image OrderIso.upperBounds_image
theorem lowerBounds_image {s : Set α} : lowerBounds (f '' s) = f '' lowerBounds s :=
@upperBounds_image αᵒᵈ βᵒᵈ _ _ f.dual _
#align order_iso.lower_bounds_image OrderIso.lowerBounds_image
-- Porting note: by simps were `fun _ _ => f.le_iff_le` and `fun _ _ => f.symm.le_iff_le`
@[simp]
theorem isLUB_image {s : Set α} {x : β} : IsLUB (f '' s) x ↔ IsLUB s (f.symm x) :=
⟨fun h => IsLUB.of_image (by simp) ((f.apply_symm_apply x).symm ▸ h), fun h =>
(IsLUB.of_image (by simp)) <| (f.symm_image_image s).symm ▸ h⟩
#align order_iso.is_lub_image OrderIso.isLUB_image
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/OrderIso.lean | 41 | 42 | theorem isLUB_image' {s : Set α} {x : α} : IsLUB (f '' s) (f x) ↔ IsLUB s x := by |
rw [isLUB_image, f.symm_apply_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.EuclideanDist
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ContinuousMapDense
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Paracompact
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique
#align_import analysis.fourier.riemann_lebesgue_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Complex Set FiniteDimensional
open scoped Filter Topology Real ENNReal FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace NNReal
variable {E V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : V → E}
section InnerProductSpace
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ V]
#align fourier_integrand_integrable Real.fourierIntegral_convergent_iff
variable [CompleteSpace E]
local notation3 "i" => fun (w : V) => (1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ 2) : ℝ) • w
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/RiemannLebesgueLemma.lean | 68 | 92 | theorem fourierIntegral_half_period_translate {w : V} (hw : w ≠ 0) :
(∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f (v + i w)) = -∫ v : V, 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f v := by |
have hiw : ⟪i w, w⟫ = 1 / 2 := by
rw [inner_smul_left, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, RCLike.ofReal_real_eq_id, id,
RCLike.conj_to_real, ← div_div, div_mul_cancel₀]
rwa [Ne, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
have :
(fun v : V => 𝐞 (-⟪v, w⟫) • f (v + i w)) =
fun v : V => (fun x : V => -(𝐞 (-⟪x, w⟫) • f x)) (v + i w) := by
ext1 v
simp_rw [inner_add_left, hiw, Submonoid.smul_def, Real.fourierChar_apply, neg_add, mul_add,
ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add]
have : 2 * π * -(1 / 2) = -π := by field_simp; ring
rw [this, ofReal_neg, neg_mul, exp_neg, exp_pi_mul_I, inv_neg, inv_one, mul_neg_one, neg_smul,
neg_neg]
rw [this]
-- Porting note:
-- The next three lines had just been
-- rw [integral_add_right_eq_self (fun (x : V) ↦ -(𝐞[-⟪x, w⟫]) • f x)
-- ((fun w ↦ (1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ (2 : ℕ))) • w) w)]
-- Unfortunately now we need to specify `volume`.
have := integral_add_right_eq_self (μ := volume) (fun (x : V) ↦ -(𝐞 (-⟪x, w⟫) • f x))
((fun w ↦ (1 / (2 * ‖w‖ ^ (2 : ℕ))) • w) w)
rw [this]
simp only [neg_smul, integral_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.UniformLimitsDeriv
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
#align_import analysis.calculus.series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Metric TopologicalSpace Function Asymptotics Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal
variable {α β 𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [CompleteSpace F] {u : α → ℝ}
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {f : α → E → F} {f' : α → E → E →L[𝕜] F} {g : α → 𝕜 → F} {g' : α → 𝕜 → F} {v : ℕ → α → ℝ}
{s : Set E} {t : Set 𝕜} {x₀ x : E} {y₀ y : 𝕜} {N : ℕ∞}
theorem summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (hs : IsOpen s)
(h's : IsPreconnected s) (hf : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hf0 : Summable (f · x₀))
(hx : x ∈ s) : Summable fun n => f n x := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset] at hf0 ⊢
have A : UniformCauchySeqOn (fun t : Finset α => fun x => ∑ i ∈ t, f' i x) atTop s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_tsum hu hf').uniformCauchySeqOn
-- Porting note: Lean 4 failed to find `f` by unification
refine cauchy_map_of_uniformCauchySeqOn_fderiv (f := fun t x ↦ ∑ i ∈ t, f i x)
hs h's A (fun t y hy => ?_) hx₀ hx hf0
exact HasFDerivAt.sum fun i _ => hf i y hy
#align summable_of_summable_has_fderiv_at_of_is_preconnected summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected
theorem summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (ht : IsOpen t)
(h't : IsPreconnected t) (hg : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hy₀ : y₀ ∈ t) (hg0 : Summable (g · y₀))
(hy : y ∈ t) : Summable fun n => g n y := by
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg
refine summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu ht h't hg ?_ hy₀ hg0 hy
simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
theorem hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (hs : IsOpen s)
(h's : IsPreconnected s) (hf : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, x ∈ s → ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀)
(hx : x ∈ s) : HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) (∑' n, f' n x) x := by
classical
have A :
∀ x : E, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun t : Finset α => ∑ n ∈ t, f n x) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n x)) := by
intro y hy
apply Summable.hasSum
exact summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu hs h's hf hf' hx₀ hf0 hy
refine hasFDerivAt_of_tendstoUniformlyOn hs (tendstoUniformlyOn_tsum hu hf')
(fun t y hy => ?_) A _ hx
exact HasFDerivAt.sum fun n _ => hf n y hy
#align has_fderiv_at_tsum_of_is_preconnected hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected
theorem hasDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected (hu : Summable u) (ht : IsOpen t)
(h't : IsPreconnected t) (hg : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, y ∈ t → ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hy₀ : y₀ ∈ t) (hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀)
(hy : y ∈ t) : HasDerivAt (fun z => ∑' n, g n z) (∑' n, g' n y) y := by
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg ⊢
convert hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected hu ht h't hg ?_ hy₀ hg0 hy
· exact (ContinuousLinearMap.smulRightL 𝕜 𝕜 F 1).map_tsum <|
.of_norm_bounded u hu fun n ↦ hg' n y hy
· simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
theorem summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt (hu : Summable u)
(hf : ∀ n x, HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x) (hf' : ∀ n x, ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n)
(hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀) (x : E) : Summable fun n => f n x := by
let _ : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
exact summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n x _ => hf n x) (fun n x _ => hf' n x) (mem_univ _) hf0 (mem_univ _)
#align summable_of_summable_has_fderiv_at summable_of_summable_hasFDerivAt
theorem summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt (hu : Summable u)
(hg : ∀ n y, HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y) (hg' : ∀ n y, ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n)
(hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀) (y : 𝕜) : Summable fun n => g n y := by
exact summable_of_summable_hasDerivAt_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n x _ => hg n x) (fun n x _ => hg' n x) (mem_univ _) hg0 (mem_univ _)
theorem hasFDerivAt_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hf : ∀ n x, HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) (hf0 : Summable fun n => f n x₀) (x : E) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => ∑' n, f n y) (∑' n, f' n x) x := by
let A : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
exact hasFDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n x _ => hf n x) (fun n x _ => hf' n x) (mem_univ _) hf0 (mem_univ _)
#align has_fderiv_at_tsum hasFDerivAt_tsum
theorem hasDerivAt_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hg : ∀ n y, HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) (hg0 : Summable fun n => g n y₀) (y : 𝕜) :
HasDerivAt (fun z => ∑' n, g n z) (∑' n, g' n y) y := by
exact hasDerivAt_tsum_of_isPreconnected hu isOpen_univ isPreconnected_univ
(fun n y _ => hg n y) (fun n y _ => hg' n y) (mem_univ _) hg0 (mem_univ _)
theorem differentiable_tsum (hu : Summable u) (hf : ∀ n x, HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n x) x)
(hf' : ∀ n x, ‖f' n x‖ ≤ u n) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => ∑' n, f n y := by
by_cases h : ∃ x₀, Summable fun n => f n x₀
· rcases h with ⟨x₀, hf0⟩
intro x
exact (hasFDerivAt_tsum hu hf hf' hf0 x).differentiableAt
· push_neg at h
have : (fun x => ∑' n, f n x) = 0 := by ext1 x; exact tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable (h x)
rw [this]
exact differentiable_const 0
#align differentiable_tsum differentiable_tsum
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/SmoothSeries.lean | 161 | 165 | theorem differentiable_tsum' (hu : Summable u) (hg : ∀ n y, HasDerivAt (g n) (g' n y) y)
(hg' : ∀ n y, ‖g' n y‖ ≤ u n) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun z => ∑' n, g n z := by |
simp_rw [hasDerivAt_iff_hasFDerivAt] at hg
refine differentiable_tsum hu hg ?_
simpa? says simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, norm_one, one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.preadditive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"986c4d5761f938b2e1c43c01f001b6d9d88c2055"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive CategoryTheory.MonoidalPreadditive
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensorLeft_additive
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensorRight_additive
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringLeft_additive
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringRight_additive
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : MonoidalFunctor D C) [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive_of_faithful CategoryTheory.monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem tensor_sum {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(f ⊗ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ⊗ g j := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, whiskerLeft_sum, Preadditive.comp_sum]
#align category_theory.tensor_sum CategoryTheory.tensor_sum
theorem sum_tensor {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ⊗ f = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ⊗ f := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, sum_whiskerRight, Preadditive.sum_comp]
#align category_theory.sum_tensor CategoryTheory.sum_tensor
-- In a closed monoidal category, this would hold because
-- `tensorLeft X` is a left adjoint and hence preserves all colimits.
-- In any case it is true in any preadditive category.
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorLeft X) where
preserves {J} :=
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← tensor_sum, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i]) } }
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorRight X) where
preserves {J} :=
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← sum_tensor, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i]) } }
variable [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
def leftDistributor {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) : X ⊗ ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ fun j => X ⊗ f j :=
(tensorLeft X).mapBiproduct f
#align category_theory.left_distributor CategoryTheory.leftDistributor
theorem leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom =
∑ j : J, (X ◁ biproduct.π f j) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.left_distributor_hom CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_hom
theorem leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) := by
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp, zero_comp,
Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp,
biproduct.ι_desc]
#align category_theory.left_distributor_inv CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = X ◁ biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(X ◁ biproduct.ι _ j) ≫ (leftDistributor X f).hom = biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc,
biproduct.ι_π, whiskerLeft_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_inv_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.π _ j) = biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.sum_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
biproduct.ι_π, whiskerLeft_dite, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ (leftDistributor X f).inv = X ◁ biproduct.ι _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
theorem leftDistributor_assoc {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X Y : C) (f : J → C) :
(asIso (𝟙 X) ⊗ leftDistributor Y f) ≪≫ leftDistributor X _ =
(α_ X Y (⨁ f)).symm ≪≫ leftDistributor (X ⊗ Y) f ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => α_ X Y _ := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, tensor_sum,
id_tensor_comp, tensorIso_hom, leftDistributor_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map,
biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero]
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π]
simp only [id_tensor_comp, tensor_dite, comp_dite]
simp
#align category_theory.left_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_assoc
def rightDistributor {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) : (⨁ f) ⊗ X ≅ ⨁ fun j => f j ⊗ X :=
(tensorRight X).mapBiproduct f
#align category_theory.right_distributor CategoryTheory.rightDistributor
theorem rightDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) :
(rightDistributor f X).hom =
∑ j : J, (biproduct.π f j ▷ X) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => f j ⊗ X) j := by
ext
dsimp [rightDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, ite_true]
#align category_theory.right_distributor_hom CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_hom
theorem rightDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) :
(rightDistributor f X).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) := by
ext
dsimp [rightDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [biproduct.ι_desc, Preadditive.comp_sum, ne_eq, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp, ite_true]
#align category_theory.right_distributor_inv CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem rightDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(rightDistributor f X).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = biproduct.π _ j ▷ X := by
simp [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_rightDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(biproduct.ι _ j ▷ X) ≫ (rightDistributor f X).hom = biproduct.ι (fun j => f j ⊗ X) j := by
simp [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
dite_whiskerRight, dite_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem rightDistributor_inv_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(rightDistributor f X).inv ≫ (biproduct.π _ j ▷ X) = biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.sum_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.comp_whiskerRight,
biproduct.ι_π, dite_whiskerRight, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_rightDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ (rightDistributor f X).inv = biproduct.ι _ j ▷ X := by
simp [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc,
dite_comp]
theorem rightDistributor_assoc {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X Y : C) :
(rightDistributor f X ⊗ asIso (𝟙 Y)) ≪≫ rightDistributor _ Y =
α_ (⨁ f) X Y ≪≫ rightDistributor f (X ⊗ Y) ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => (α_ _ X Y).symm := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, sum_tensor,
comp_tensor_id, tensorIso_hom, rightDistributor_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map,
biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← comp_tensor_id, biproduct.ι_π, dite_tensor, comp_dite]
simp
#align category_theory.right_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_assoc
theorem leftDistributor_rightDistributor_assoc {J : Type _} [Fintype J]
(X : C) (f : J → C) (Y : C) :
(leftDistributor X f ⊗ asIso (𝟙 Y)) ≪≫ rightDistributor _ Y =
α_ X (⨁ f) Y ≪≫
(asIso (𝟙 X) ⊗ rightDistributor _ Y) ≪≫
leftDistributor X _ ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => (α_ _ _ _).symm := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, sum_tensor,
tensor_sum, comp_tensor_id, tensorIso_hom, leftDistributor_hom, rightDistributor_hom,
biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map, biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero, Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← comp_tensor_id, ← id_tensor_comp_assoc, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
dite_comp, tensor_dite, dite_tensor]
simp
#align category_theory.left_distributor_right_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_rightDistributor_assoc
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext_left {J : Type} [Fintype J] {X Y : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⊗ ⨁ f ⟶ Y}
(w : ∀ j, (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) ≫ g = (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) ≫ h) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_epi (leftDistributor X f).inv).mp
ext
simp? [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp] says
simp only [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]
apply w
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext_right {J : Type} [Fintype J] {X Y : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⟶ Y ⊗ ⨁ f}
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ (Y ◁ biproduct.π f j) = h ≫ (Y ◁ biproduct.π f j)) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_mono (leftDistributor Y f).hom).mp
ext
simp? [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
comp_dite] says
simp only [leftDistributor_hom, Category.assoc, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
comp_zero, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
apply w
-- One might wonder how many iterated tensor products we need simp lemmas for.
-- The answer is two: this lemma is needed to verify the pentagon identity.
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext₂_left {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{X Y Z : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⊗ (Y ⊗ ⨁ f) ⟶ Z}
(w : ∀ j, (X ◁ (Y ◁ biproduct.ι f j)) ≫ g = (X ◁ (Y ◁ biproduct.ι f j)) ≫ h) :
g = h := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom).mp
ext
simp [w]
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext₂_right {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{X Y Z : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⟶ Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ ⨁ f)}
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ (Y ◁ (Z ◁ biproduct.π f j)) = h ≫ (Y ◁ (Z ◁ biproduct.π f j))) :
g = h := by
apply (cancel_mono (α_ _ _ _).inv).mp
ext
simp [w]
@[ext]
theorem rightDistributor_ext_left {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{f : J → C} {X Y : C} {g h : (⨁ f) ⊗ X ⟶ Y}
(w : ∀ j, (biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) ≫ g = (biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) ≫ h) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_epi (rightDistributor f X).inv).mp
ext
simp? [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp] says
simp only [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]
apply w
@[ext]
theorem rightDistributor_ext_right {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{f : J → C} {X Y : C} {g h : X ⟶ (⨁ f) ⊗ Y}
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ (biproduct.π f j ▷ Y) = h ≫ (biproduct.π f j ▷ Y)) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_mono (rightDistributor f Y).hom).mp
ext
simp? [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
comp_dite] says
simp only [rightDistributor_hom, Category.assoc, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
comp_zero, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
apply w
@[ext]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 352 | 358 | theorem rightDistributor_ext₂_left {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{f : J → C} {X Y Z : C} {g h : ((⨁ f) ⊗ X) ⊗ Y ⟶ Z}
(w : ∀ j, ((biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) ▷ Y) ≫ g = ((biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) ▷ Y) ≫ h) :
g = h := by |
apply (cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv).mp
ext
simp [w]
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Projections
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.FunctorCategories
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.FunctorExtension
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.p_infty from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive
CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject CategoryTheory.Idempotents Opposite Simplicial DoldKan
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {X : SimplicialObject C}
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/PInfty.lean | 36 | 42 | theorem P_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((P (q + 1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) = (P q).f n := by |
rcases n with (_|n)
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, P_f_0_eq]
· simp only [P_succ, add_right_eq_self, comp_add, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, comp_id]
exact (HigherFacesVanish.of_P q n).comp_Hσ_eq_zero (Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hqn)
|
import Mathlib.Order.Lattice
#align_import order.min_max from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70d50ecfd4900dd6d328da39ab7ebd516abe4025"
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
attribute [simp] max_eq_left max_eq_right min_eq_left min_eq_right
section
variable [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {a b c d : α}
-- translate from lattices to linear orders (sup → max, inf → min)
@[simp]
theorem le_min_iff : c ≤ min a b ↔ c ≤ a ∧ c ≤ b :=
le_inf_iff
#align le_min_iff le_min_iff
@[simp]
theorem le_max_iff : a ≤ max b c ↔ a ≤ b ∨ a ≤ c :=
le_sup_iff
#align le_max_iff le_max_iff
@[simp]
theorem min_le_iff : min a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∨ b ≤ c :=
inf_le_iff
#align min_le_iff min_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem max_le_iff : max a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
sup_le_iff
#align max_le_iff max_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_min_iff : a < min b c ↔ a < b ∧ a < c :=
lt_inf_iff
#align lt_min_iff lt_min_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_max_iff : a < max b c ↔ a < b ∨ a < c :=
lt_sup_iff
#align lt_max_iff lt_max_iff
@[simp]
theorem min_lt_iff : min a b < c ↔ a < c ∨ b < c :=
inf_lt_iff
#align min_lt_iff min_lt_iff
@[simp]
theorem max_lt_iff : max a b < c ↔ a < c ∧ b < c :=
sup_lt_iff
#align max_lt_iff max_lt_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem max_le_max : a ≤ c → b ≤ d → max a b ≤ max c d :=
sup_le_sup
#align max_le_max max_le_max
@[gcongr] theorem max_le_max_left (c) (h : a ≤ b) : max c a ≤ max c b := sup_le_sup_left h c
@[gcongr] theorem max_le_max_right (c) (h : a ≤ b) : max a c ≤ max b c := sup_le_sup_right h c
@[gcongr]
theorem min_le_min : a ≤ c → b ≤ d → min a b ≤ min c d :=
inf_le_inf
#align min_le_min min_le_min
@[gcongr] theorem min_le_min_left (c) (h : a ≤ b) : min c a ≤ min c b := inf_le_inf_left c h
@[gcongr] theorem min_le_min_right (c) (h : a ≤ b) : min a c ≤ min b c := inf_le_inf_right c h
theorem le_max_of_le_left : a ≤ b → a ≤ max b c :=
le_sup_of_le_left
#align le_max_of_le_left le_max_of_le_left
theorem le_max_of_le_right : a ≤ c → a ≤ max b c :=
le_sup_of_le_right
#align le_max_of_le_right le_max_of_le_right
theorem lt_max_of_lt_left (h : a < b) : a < max b c :=
h.trans_le (le_max_left b c)
#align lt_max_of_lt_left lt_max_of_lt_left
theorem lt_max_of_lt_right (h : a < c) : a < max b c :=
h.trans_le (le_max_right b c)
#align lt_max_of_lt_right lt_max_of_lt_right
theorem min_le_of_left_le : a ≤ c → min a b ≤ c :=
inf_le_of_left_le
#align min_le_of_left_le min_le_of_left_le
theorem min_le_of_right_le : b ≤ c → min a b ≤ c :=
inf_le_of_right_le
#align min_le_of_right_le min_le_of_right_le
theorem min_lt_of_left_lt (h : a < c) : min a b < c :=
(min_le_left a b).trans_lt h
#align min_lt_of_left_lt min_lt_of_left_lt
theorem min_lt_of_right_lt (h : b < c) : min a b < c :=
(min_le_right a b).trans_lt h
#align min_lt_of_right_lt min_lt_of_right_lt
lemma max_min_distrib_left (a b c : α) : max a (min b c) = min (max a b) (max a c) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align max_min_distrib_left max_min_distrib_left
lemma max_min_distrib_right (a b c : α) : max (min a b) c = min (max a c) (max b c) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align max_min_distrib_right max_min_distrib_right
lemma min_max_distrib_left (a b c : α) : min a (max b c) = max (min a b) (min a c) :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align min_max_distrib_left min_max_distrib_left
lemma min_max_distrib_right (a b c : α) : min (max a b) c = max (min a c) (min b c) :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align min_max_distrib_right min_max_distrib_right
theorem min_le_max : min a b ≤ max a b :=
le_trans (min_le_left a b) (le_max_left a b)
#align min_le_max min_le_max
@[simp]
theorem min_eq_left_iff : min a b = a ↔ a ≤ b :=
inf_eq_left
#align min_eq_left_iff min_eq_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem min_eq_right_iff : min a b = b ↔ b ≤ a :=
inf_eq_right
#align min_eq_right_iff min_eq_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_left_iff : max a b = a ↔ b ≤ a :=
sup_eq_left
#align max_eq_left_iff max_eq_left_iff
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_right_iff : max a b = b ↔ a ≤ b :=
sup_eq_right
#align max_eq_right_iff max_eq_right_iff
theorem min_cases (a b : α) : min a b = a ∧ a ≤ b ∨ min a b = b ∧ b < a := by
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· left
exact ⟨min_eq_left h, h⟩
· right
exact ⟨min_eq_right (le_of_lt (not_le.mp h)), not_le.mp h⟩
#align min_cases min_cases
theorem max_cases (a b : α) : max a b = a ∧ b ≤ a ∨ max a b = b ∧ a < b :=
@min_cases αᵒᵈ _ a b
#align max_cases max_cases
theorem min_eq_iff : min a b = c ↔ a = c ∧ a ≤ b ∨ b = c ∧ b ≤ a := by
constructor
· intro h
refine Or.imp (fun h' => ?_) (fun h' => ?_) (le_total a b) <;> exact ⟨by simpa [h'] using h, h'⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, h⟩ | ⟨rfl, h⟩) <;> simp [h]
#align min_eq_iff min_eq_iff
theorem max_eq_iff : max a b = c ↔ a = c ∧ b ≤ a ∨ b = c ∧ a ≤ b :=
@min_eq_iff αᵒᵈ _ a b c
#align max_eq_iff max_eq_iff
theorem min_lt_min_left_iff : min a c < min b c ↔ a < b ∧ a < c := by
simp_rw [lt_min_iff, min_lt_iff, or_iff_left (lt_irrefl _)]
exact and_congr_left fun h => or_iff_left_of_imp h.trans
#align min_lt_min_left_iff min_lt_min_left_iff
| Mathlib/Order/MinMax.lean | 196 | 197 | theorem min_lt_min_right_iff : min a b < min a c ↔ b < c ∧ b < a := by |
simp_rw [min_comm a, min_lt_min_left_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle EuclideanGeometry.oangle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (o.continuousAt_oangle hf1 hf2).comp ((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_oangle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left_right
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3)).toEquiv]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affine_independent EuclideanGeometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.affine_independent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vector_span_eq EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_swap EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_swap
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_cyc3 EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_cyc3
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_right_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_left_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_to_real EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
#align euclidean_geometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rotate_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rotate_sign
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
#align sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
#align sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
#align wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
#align wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ := by
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
by_cases hp₁'p₂ : p₁' = p₂; · rw [hp₁'p₂, wbtw_self_iff] at h; exact False.elim (hp₁p₂ h)
rw [← oangle_add hp₁'p₂ hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, h.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero, zero_add]
#align wbtw.oangle_eq_left Wbtw.oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_left {p₁ p₁' p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₁') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁' p₂ p₃ :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_left h.ne_left
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_left Sbtw.oangle_eq_left
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' := by rw [oangle_rev, h.oangle_eq_left hp₃p₂, ← oangle_rev]
#align wbtw.oangle_eq_right Wbtw.oangle_eq_right
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle_eq_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₃' : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₃') :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃' :=
h.wbtw.oangle_eq_right h.ne_left
#align sbtw.oangle_eq_right Sbtw.oangle_eq_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 585 | 587 | theorem oangle_midpoint_left (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by |
by_cases h : p₁ = p₂; · simp [h]
exact (sbtw_midpoint_of_ne ℝ h).symm.oangle_eq_left
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 352 | 354 | theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by |
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Submodule
#align_import algebra.lie.ideal_operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8983bec7cdf6cb2dd1f21315c8a34ab00d7b2f6d"
universe u v w w₁ w₂
namespace LieSubmodule
variable {R : Type u} {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {M₂ : Type w₁}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M₂] [LieRingModule L M₂] [LieModule R L M₂]
variable (N N' : LieSubmodule R L M) (I J : LieIdeal R L) (N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M₂)
section LieIdealOperations
instance hasBracket : Bracket (LieIdeal R L) (LieSubmodule R L M) :=
⟨fun I N => lieSpan R L { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m }⟩
#align lie_submodule.has_bracket LieSubmodule.hasBracket
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_span :
⁅I, N⁆ = lieSpan R L { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m } :=
rfl
#align lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_span LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_span
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) =
Submodule.span R { m | ∃ (x : I) (n : N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m } := by
apply le_antisymm
· let s := { m : M | ∃ (x : ↥I) (n : ↥N), ⁅(x : L), (n : M)⁆ = m }
have aux : ∀ (y : L), ∀ m' ∈ Submodule.span R s, ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s := by
intro y m' hm'
refine Submodule.span_induction (R := R) (M := M) (s := s)
(p := fun m' ↦ ⁅y, m'⁆ ∈ Submodule.span R s) hm' ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro m'' ⟨x, n, hm''⟩; rw [← hm'', leibniz_lie]
refine Submodule.add_mem _ ?_ ?_ <;> apply Submodule.subset_span
· use ⟨⁅y, ↑x⁆, I.lie_mem x.property⟩, n
· use x, ⟨⁅y, ↑n⁆, N.lie_mem n.property⟩
· simp only [lie_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· intro m₁ m₂ hm₁ hm₂; rw [lie_add]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ hm₁ hm₂
· intro t m'' hm''; rw [lie_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_mem _ t hm''
change _ ≤ ({ Submodule.span R s with lie_mem := fun hm' => aux _ _ hm' } : LieSubmodule R L M)
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]
exact Submodule.subset_span
· rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply submodule_span_le_lieSpan
#align lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span
theorem lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span' :
(↑⁅I, N⁆ : Submodule R M) = Submodule.span R { m | ∃ x ∈ I, ∃ n ∈ N, ⁅x, n⁆ = m } := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span]
congr
ext m
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx, n, hn, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩
#align lie_submodule.lie_ideal_oper_eq_linear_span' LieSubmodule.lieIdeal_oper_eq_linear_span'
theorem lie_le_iff : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ m ∈ N, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N' := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, LieSubmodule.lieSpan_le]
refine ⟨fun h x hx m hm => h ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩
exact h x hx m hm
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_iff LieSubmodule.lie_le_iff
theorem lie_coe_mem_lie (x : I) (m : N) : ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span]; apply subset_lieSpan; use x, m
#align lie_submodule.lie_coe_mem_lie LieSubmodule.lie_coe_mem_lie
theorem lie_mem_lie {x : L} {m : M} (hx : x ∈ I) (hm : m ∈ N) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ ⁅I, N⁆ :=
N.lie_coe_mem_lie I ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨m, hm⟩
#align lie_submodule.lie_mem_lie LieSubmodule.lie_mem_lie
theorem lie_comm : ⁅I, J⁆ = ⁅J, I⁆ := by
suffices ∀ I J : LieIdeal R L, ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ ⁅J, I⁆ by exact le_antisymm (this I J) (this J I)
clear! I J; intro I J
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro x ⟨y, z, h⟩; rw [← h]
rw [← lie_skew, ← lie_neg, ← LieSubmodule.coe_neg]
apply lie_coe_mem_lie
#align lie_submodule.lie_comm LieSubmodule.lie_comm
theorem lie_le_right : ⁅I, N⁆ ≤ N := by
rw [lieIdeal_oper_eq_span, lieSpan_le]; rintro m ⟨x, n, hn⟩; rw [← hn]
exact N.lie_mem n.property
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_right LieSubmodule.lie_le_right
theorem lie_le_left : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I := by rw [lie_comm]; exact lie_le_right I J
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_left LieSubmodule.lie_le_left
theorem lie_le_inf : ⁅I, J⁆ ≤ I ⊓ J := by rw [le_inf_iff]; exact ⟨lie_le_left I J, lie_le_right J I⟩
#align lie_submodule.lie_le_inf LieSubmodule.lie_le_inf
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/IdealOperations.lean | 131 | 131 | theorem lie_bot : ⁅I, (⊥ : LieSubmodule R L M)⁆ = ⊥ := by | rw [eq_bot_iff]; apply lie_le_right
|
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import order.heyting.boundary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70d50ecfd4900dd6d328da39ab7ebd516abe4025"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Coheyting
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
def boundary (a : α) : α :=
a ⊓ ￢a
#align coheyting.boundary Coheyting.boundary
scoped[Heyting] prefix:120 "∂ " => Coheyting.boundary
-- Porting note: Should the notation be automatically included in the current scope?
open Heyting
-- Porting note: Should hnot be named hNot?
theorem inf_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊓ ￢a = ∂ a :=
rfl
#align coheyting.inf_hnot_self Coheyting.inf_hnot_self
theorem boundary_le : ∂ a ≤ a :=
inf_le_left
#align coheyting.boundary_le Coheyting.boundary_le
theorem boundary_le_hnot : ∂ a ≤ ￢a :=
inf_le_right
#align coheyting.boundary_le_hnot Coheyting.boundary_le_hnot
@[simp]
theorem boundary_bot : ∂ (⊥ : α) = ⊥ := bot_inf_eq _
#align coheyting.boundary_bot Coheyting.boundary_bot
@[simp]
theorem boundary_top : ∂ (⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [boundary, hnot_top, inf_bot_eq]
#align coheyting.boundary_top Coheyting.boundary_top
theorem boundary_hnot_le (a : α) : ∂ (￢a) ≤ ∂ a :=
(inf_comm _ _).trans_le <| inf_le_inf_right _ hnot_hnot_le
#align coheyting.boundary_hnot_le Coheyting.boundary_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem boundary_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ∂ (￢￢a) = ∂ (￢a) := by
simp_rw [boundary, hnot_hnot_hnot, inf_comm]
#align coheyting.boundary_hnot_hnot Coheyting.boundary_hnot_hnot
@[simp]
theorem hnot_boundary (a : α) : ￢∂ a = ⊤ := by rw [boundary, hnot_inf_distrib, sup_hnot_self]
#align coheyting.hnot_boundary Coheyting.hnot_boundary
theorem boundary_inf (a b : α) : ∂ (a ⊓ b) = ∂ a ⊓ b ⊔ a ⊓ ∂ b := by
unfold boundary
rw [hnot_inf_distrib, inf_sup_left, inf_right_comm, ← inf_assoc]
#align coheyting.boundary_inf Coheyting.boundary_inf
theorem boundary_inf_le : ∂ (a ⊓ b) ≤ ∂ a ⊔ ∂ b :=
(boundary_inf _ _).trans_le <| sup_le_sup inf_le_left inf_le_right
#align coheyting.boundary_inf_le Coheyting.boundary_inf_le
theorem boundary_sup_le : ∂ (a ⊔ b) ≤ ∂ a ⊔ ∂ b := by
rw [boundary, inf_sup_right]
exact
sup_le_sup (inf_le_inf_left _ <| hnot_anti le_sup_left)
(inf_le_inf_left _ <| hnot_anti le_sup_right)
#align coheyting.boundary_sup_le Coheyting.boundary_sup_le
example (a b : Prop) : (a ∧ b ∨ ¬(a ∧ b)) ∧ ((a ∨ b) ∨ ¬(a ∨ b)) → a ∨ ¬a := by
rintro ⟨⟨ha, _⟩ | hnab, (ha | hb) | hnab⟩ <;> try exact Or.inl ha
· exact Or.inr fun ha => hnab ⟨ha, hb⟩
· exact Or.inr fun ha => hnab <| Or.inl ha
theorem boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left : ∂ a ≤ ∂ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ ∂ (a ⊓ b) := by
-- Porting note: the following simp generates the same term as mathlib3 if you remove
-- sup_inf_right from both. With sup_inf_right included, mathlib4 and mathlib3 generate
-- different terms
simp only [boundary, sup_inf_left, sup_inf_right, sup_right_idem, le_inf_iff, sup_assoc,
sup_comm _ a]
refine ⟨⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> try { exact le_sup_of_le_left inf_le_left } <;>
refine inf_le_of_right_le ?_
· rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, codisjoint_left_comm]
exact codisjoint_hnot_left
· refine le_sup_of_le_right ?_
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right]
exact codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_right (hnot_anti inf_le_left)
#align coheyting.boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left Coheyting.boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left
theorem boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_right : ∂ b ≤ ∂ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ ∂ (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [sup_comm a, inf_comm]
exact boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left
#align coheyting.boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_right Coheyting.boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_right
theorem boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf (a b : α) : ∂ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ ∂ (a ⊓ b) = ∂ a ⊔ ∂ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le boundary_sup_le boundary_inf_le) <|
sup_le boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_left
boundary_le_boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf_right
#align coheyting.boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf Coheyting.boundary_sup_sup_boundary_inf
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Boundary.lean | 132 | 132 | theorem boundary_idem (a : α) : ∂ ∂ a = ∂ a := by | rw [boundary, hnot_boundary, inf_top_eq]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.