Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.simple_func from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
structure SimpleFunc.{u, v} (α : Type u) [MeasurableSpace α] (β : Type v) where
toFun : α → β
measurableSet_fiber' : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (toFun ⁻¹' {x})
finite_range' : (Set.range toFun).Finite
#align measure_theory.simple_func MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
#align measure_theory.simple_func.to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.toFun
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range'
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →ₛ β) fun _ => α → β :=
⟨toFun⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instCoeFun
theorem coe_injective ⦃f g : α →ₛ β⦄ (H : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g := by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_injective MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ₛ β} (H : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
coe_injective <| funext H
#align measure_theory.simple_func.ext MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ext
theorem finite_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (Set.range f).Finite :=
f.finite_range'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range
theorem measurableSet_fiber (f : α →ₛ β) (x : β) : MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {x}) :=
f.measurableSet_fiber' x
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem apply_mk (f : α → β) (h h') (x : α) : SimpleFunc.mk f h h' x = f x :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.apply_mk MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.apply_mk
def ofFinite [Finite α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (f : α → β) : α →ₛ β where
toFun := f
measurableSet_fiber' x := (toFinite (f ⁻¹' {x})).measurableSet
finite_range' := Set.finite_range f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")] alias ofFintype := ofFinite
def ofIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : α →ₛ β := ofFinite isEmptyElim
#align measure_theory.simple_func.of_is_empty MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.ofIsEmpty
protected def range (f : α →ₛ β) : Finset β :=
f.finite_range.toFinset
#align measure_theory.simple_func.range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {b} : b ∈ f.range ↔ b ∈ range f :=
Finite.mem_toFinset _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range
theorem mem_range_self (f : α →ₛ β) (x : α) : f x ∈ f.range :=
mem_range.2 ⟨x, rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range_self MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range_self
@[simp]
theorem coe_range (f : α →ₛ β) : (↑f.range : Set β) = Set.range f :=
f.finite_range.coe_toFinset
#align measure_theory.simple_func.coe_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.coe_range
theorem mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero {f : α →ₛ β} {x : β} {μ : Measure α} (H : μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) ≠ 0) :
x ∈ f.range :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero H
mem_range.2 ⟨a, ha⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.mem_range_of_measure_ne_zero
theorem forall_mem_range {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∀ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) := by
simp only [mem_range, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.forall_mem_range MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.forall_mem_range
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFunc.lean | 129 | 130 | theorem exists_range_iff {f : α →ₛ β} {p : β → Prop} : (∃ y ∈ f.range, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) := by |
simpa only [mem_range, exists_prop] using Set.exists_range_iff
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Image
theorem image_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α} : (f '' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f '' s i := by
ext1 x
simp only [mem_image, mem_iUnion, ← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left]
-- Porting note: `exists_swap` causes a `simp` loop in Lean4 so we use `rw` instead.
rw [exists_swap]
#align set.image_Union Set.image_iUnion
theorem image_iUnion₂ (f : α → β) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iUnion]
#align set.image_Union₂ Set.image_iUnion₂
theorem univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : Set (Subtype p)) = ⋃ (x) (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩} :=
Set.ext fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by simp [h]
#align set.univ_subtype Set.univ_subtype
theorem range_eq_iUnion {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = ⋃ i, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [@eq_comm α a]
#align set.range_eq_Union Set.range_eq_iUnion
theorem image_eq_iUnion (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = ⋃ i ∈ s, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [@eq_comm β b]
#align set.image_eq_Union Set.image_eq_iUnion
theorem biUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋃ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) :=
iSup_range
#align set.bUnion_range Set.biUnion_range
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,681 | 1,682 | theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋃ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) := by | simpa using biUnion_range
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_singleton Nat.ofDigits_singleton
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_one_cons Nat.ofDigits_one_cons
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
#align nat.of_digits_append Nat.ofDigits_append
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
#align nat.coe_of_digits Nat.coe_ofDigits
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
#align nat.coe_int_of_digits Nat.coe_int_ofDigits
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
#align nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero Nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
#align nat.digits_of_digits Nat.digits_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
cases' b with b
· cases' n with n
· rfl
· change ofDigits 0 [n + 1] = n + 1
dsimp [ofDigits]
· cases' b with b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· apply Nat.strongInductionOn n _
clear n
intro n h
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
#align nat.of_digits_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
#align nat.of_digits_one Nat.ofDigits_one
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
#align nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero Nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
#align nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
#align nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div Nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
#align nat.digits_last Nat.digits_getLast
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
#align nat.digits.injective Nat.digits.injective
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
#align nat.digits_inj_iff Nat.digits_inj_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· have hb0 : b ≠ 0 := (Nat.succ_le_iff.1 hb).ne_bot
simp [h, log_eq_zero_iff, ← Nat.div_eq_zero_iff hb0.bot_lt]
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
#align nat.digits_len Nat.digits_len
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
#align nat.last_digit_ne_zero Nat.getLast_digit_ne_zero
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH d hd
cases' n with n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by simp)
-- Porting note: Previous code (single line) contained linarith.
-- . exact IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) (by linarith)) hd
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
#align nat.digits_lt_base' Nat.digits_lt_base'
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
#align nat.digits_lt_base Nat.digits_lt_base
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length'
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits' Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits'
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.of_digits_digits_append_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits_append_digits
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp [List.replicate_add]
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append' _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp_arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
#align nat.digits_len_le_digits_len_succ Nat.digits_len_le_digits_len_succ
theorem le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
#align nat.le_digits_len_le Nat.le_digits_len_le
@[mono]
theorem ofDigits_monotone {p q : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : p ≤ q) : ofDigits p L ≤ ofDigits q L := by
induction' L with _ _ hi
· rfl
· simp only [ofDigits, cast_id, add_le_add_iff_left]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul h hi
theorem sum_le_ofDigits {p : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : 1 ≤ p) : L.sum ≤ ofDigits p L :=
(ofDigits_one L).symm ▸ ofDigits_monotone L h
theorem digit_sum_le (p n : ℕ) : List.sum (digits p n) ≤ n := by
induction' n with n
· exact digits_zero _ ▸ Nat.le_refl (List.sum [])
· induction' p with p
· rw [digits_zero_succ, List.sum_cons, List.sum_nil, add_zero]
· nth_rw 2 [← ofDigits_digits p.succ (n + 1)]
rw [← ofDigits_one <| digits p.succ n.succ]
exact ofDigits_monotone (digits p.succ n.succ) <| Nat.succ_pos p
theorem pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : l ≠ []) (hl2 : l.getLast hl ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ l.length ≤ (b + 2) * ofDigits (b + 2) l := by
rw [← List.dropLast_append_getLast hl]
simp only [List.length_append, List.length, zero_add, List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_append,
List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_singleton, add_comm (l.length - 1), pow_add, pow_one]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
have : 0 < l.getLast hl := by rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero]
convert Nat.mul_le_mul_left ((b + 2) ^ (l.length - 1)) this using 1
rw [Nat.mul_one]
#align nat.pow_length_le_mul_of_digits Nat.pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le' (b m : ℕ) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length ≤ (b + 2) * m := by
have : digits (b + 2) m ≠ [] := digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm
convert @pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits b (digits (b+2) m)
this (getLast_digit_ne_zero _ hm)
rw [ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.base_pow_length_digits_le' Nat.base_pow_length_digits_le'
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le (b m : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) :
m ≠ 0 → b ^ (digits b m).length ≤ b * m := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact base_pow_length_digits_le' b m
#align nat.base_pow_length_digits_le Nat.base_pow_length_digits_le
lemma ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail {p : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ)
(w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) : ofDigits p digits / p = ofDigits p digits.tail := by
induction' digits with hd tl
· simp [ofDigits]
· refine Eq.trans (add_mul_div_left hd _ hpos) ?_
rw [Nat.div_eq_of_lt <| w₁ _ <| List.mem_cons_self _ _, zero_add]
rfl
lemma ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop
{p : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) :
ofDigits p digits / p ^ i = ofDigits p (digits.drop i) := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· rw [Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, hi, ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail hpos
(List.drop i digits) fun x hx ↦ w₁ x <| List.mem_of_mem_drop hx, ← List.drop_one,
List.drop_drop, add_comm]
lemma self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop {p : ℕ} (i n : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ p):
n / p ^ i = ofDigits p ((p.digits n).drop i) := by
convert ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop i (zero_lt_of_lt h) (p.digits n)
(fun l hl ↦ digits_lt_base h hl)
exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
open Finset
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ}
(L : List ℕ) {h_nonempty} (h_ne_zero : L.getLast h_nonempty ≠ 0) (h_lt : ∀ l ∈ L, l < p) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range L.length, (ofDigits p L) / p ^ i.succ = (ofDigits p L) - L.sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· induction' L with hd tl ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· simp only [List.length_cons, List.sum_cons, self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h,
digits_ofDigits p h (hd :: tl) h_lt (fun _ => h_ne_zero)]
simp only [ofDigits]
rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.cast_id]
simp only [List.drop, List.drop_length]
obtain rfl | h' := em <| tl = []
· simp [ofDigits]
· have w₁' := fun l hl ↦ h_lt l <| List.mem_cons_of_mem hd hl
have w₂' := fun (h : tl ≠ []) ↦ (List.getLast_cons h) ▸ h_ne_zero
have ih := ih (w₂' h') w₁'
simp only [self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h, digits_ofDigits p h tl w₁' w₂',
← Nat.one_add] at ih
have := sum_singleton (fun x ↦ ofDigits p <| tl.drop x) tl.length
rw [← Ico_succ_singleton, List.drop_length, ofDigits] at this
have h₁ : 1 ≤ tl.length := List.length_pos.mpr h'
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ <| h₁, ← add_zero (∑ x ∈ Ico _ _, ofDigits p (tl.drop x)),
← this, sum_Ico_consecutive _ h₁ <| (le_add_right tl.length 1),
← sum_Ico_add _ 0 tl.length 1,
Ico_zero_eq_range, mul_add, mul_add, ih, range_one, sum_singleton, List.drop, ofDigits,
mul_zero, add_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc <| sum_le_ofDigits _ <| Nat.le_of_lt h]
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul <| ofDigits p tl]
rw [← add_mul, one_eq_succ_zero, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| zero_lt_of_lt h,
Nat.add_sub_add_left]
· simp [ofDigits_one]
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases L
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits]
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (log p n).succ, n / p ^ i.succ = n - (p.digits n).sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· convert sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits (p.digits n) (getLast_digit_ne_zero p hn) <|
(fun l a ↦ digits_lt_base h a)
· refine (digits_len p n h hn).symm
all_goals exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
· simp
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases n
all_goals simp
theorem digits_two_eq_bits (n : ℕ) : digits 2 n = n.bits.map fun b => cond b 1 0 := by
induction' n using Nat.binaryRecFromOne with b n h ih
· simp
· rfl
rw [bits_append_bit _ _ fun hn => absurd hn h]
cases b
· rw [digits_def' one_lt_two]
· simpa [Nat.bit, Nat.bit0_val n]
· simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero, Nat.bit0_eq_zero]
· simpa [Nat.bit, Nat.bit1_val n, add_comm, digits_add 2 one_lt_two 1 n, Nat.add_mul_div_left]
#align nat.digits_two_eq_bits Nat.digits_two_eq_bits
-- This is really a theorem about polynomials.
theorem dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits {α : Type*} [CommRing α] {a b k : α} (h : k ∣ a - b)
(L : List ℕ) : k ∣ ofDigits a L - ofDigits b L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· change k ∣ 0 - 0
simp
· simp only [ofDigits, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
exact dvd_mul_sub_mul h ih
#align nat.dvd_of_digits_sub_of_digits Nat.dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_modEq' (b b' : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [MOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [MOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Nat.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod]
#align nat.of_digits_modeq' Nat.ofDigits_modEq'
theorem ofDigits_modEq (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [MOD k] :=
ofDigits_modEq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq k).symm L
#align nat.of_digits_modeq Nat.ofDigits_modEq
theorem ofDigits_mod (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_modEq b k L
#align nat.of_digits_mod Nat.ofDigits_mod
theorem ofDigits_mod_eq_head! (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) : ofDigits b l % b = l.head! % b := by
induction l <;> simp [Nat.ofDigits, Int.ModEq]
theorem head!_digits {b n : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 1) : (Nat.digits b n).head! = n % b := by
by_cases hb : 1 < b
· rcases n with _ | n
· simp
· nth_rw 2 [← Nat.ofDigits_digits b (n + 1)]
rw [Nat.ofDigits_mod_eq_head! _ _]
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.digits_lt_base hb <| List.head!_mem_self <|
Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).symm
· rcases n with _ | _ <;> simp_all [show b = 0 by omega]
theorem ofDigits_zmodeq' (b b' : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [ZMOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [ZMOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Int.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod]
#align nat.of_digits_zmodeq' Nat.ofDigits_zmodeq'
theorem ofDigits_zmodeq (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [ZMOD k] :=
ofDigits_zmodeq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq ↑k).symm L
#align nat.of_digits_zmodeq Nat.ofDigits_zmodeq
theorem ofDigits_zmod (b : ℤ) (k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_zmodeq b k L
#align nat.of_digits_zmod Nat.ofDigits_zmod
theorem modEq_digits_sum (b b' : ℕ) (h : b' % b = 1) (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits b' n).sum [MOD b] := by
rw [← ofDigits_one]
conv =>
congr
· skip
· rw [← ofDigits_digits b' n]
convert ofDigits_modEq b' b (digits b' n)
exact h.symm
#align nat.modeq_digits_sum Nat.modEq_digits_sum
theorem modEq_three_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 3] :=
modEq_digits_sum 3 10 (by norm_num) n
#align nat.modeq_three_digits_sum Nat.modEq_three_digits_sum
theorem modEq_nine_digits_sum (n : ℕ) : n ≡ (digits 10 n).sum [MOD 9] :=
modEq_digits_sum 9 10 (by norm_num) n
#align nat.modeq_nine_digits_sum Nat.modEq_nine_digits_sum
theorem zmodeq_ofDigits_digits (b b' : ℕ) (c : ℤ) (h : b' ≡ c [ZMOD b]) (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ ofDigits c (digits b' n) [ZMOD b] := by
conv =>
congr
· skip
· rw [← ofDigits_digits b' n]
rw [coe_int_ofDigits]
apply ofDigits_zmodeq' _ _ _ h
#align nat.zmodeq_of_digits_digits Nat.zmodeq_ofDigits_digits
theorem ofDigits_neg_one :
∀ L : List ℕ, ofDigits (-1 : ℤ) L = (L.map fun n : ℕ => (n : ℤ)).alternatingSum
| [] => rfl
| [n] => by simp [ofDigits, List.alternatingSum]
| a :: b :: t => by
simp only [ofDigits, List.alternatingSum, List.map_cons, ofDigits_neg_one t]
ring
#align nat.of_digits_neg_one Nat.ofDigits_neg_one
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 734 | 737 | theorem modEq_eleven_digits_sum (n : ℕ) :
n ≡ ((digits 10 n).map fun n : ℕ => (n : ℤ)).alternatingSum [ZMOD 11] := by |
have t := zmodeq_ofDigits_digits 11 10 (-1 : ℤ) (by unfold Int.ModEq; rfl) n
rwa [ofDigits_neg_one] at t
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3fb84046afd187b710170887195d50bada934ee"
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiable
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_on ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp.assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, iso.symm_comp_self]
rfl
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
rw [A, B]
exact iso.symm.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H⟩
convert iso.symm.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H using 1 <;>
ext z <;> apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x := by
rw [← iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· rw [fderiv.comp_fderivWithin x iso.differentiableAt h hxs, iso.fderiv]
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x := mt iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ]
exact iso.comp_fderivWithin uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv
lemma _root_.fderivWithin_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G))
(hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) s x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
change fderivWithin 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) s x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hs]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
change fderiv 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp' (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) =
fun x ↦ (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp L f x
theorem comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.differentiableWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 ((f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.differentiableWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (iso x) := by
simp only [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff,
preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableOn_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun H y hy => ?_, fun H y hy => iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.2 (H _ hy)⟩
rw [← iso.apply_symm_apply y, ← comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
apply H
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiable_iff {f : F → G} :
Differentiable 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [← differentiableOn_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.hasFDerivWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
have A : f = (f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm := by
rw [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm]
rfl
have B : f' = (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)).comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
rw [A, B]
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.hasFDerivWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) f' (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc,
iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff', preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 254 | 264 | theorem comp_right_fderivWithin {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ⁻¹' s) x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 f s (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by |
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x)
· exact (iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff.2 h.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x := by
intro h'
exact h (iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h')
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp]
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.FDeriv
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
open Bundle Set Topology
section SpecificFunctions
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] {E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] (I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H'') {M'' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M''] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I'' M'']
variable {s : Set M} {x : M}
section Const
variable {c : M'}
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/SpecificFunctions.lean | 184 | 187 | theorem hasMFDerivAt_const (c : M') (x : M) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' (fun _ : M => c) x (0 : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' c) := by |
refine ⟨continuous_const.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [writtenInExtChartAt, (· ∘ ·), hasFDerivWithinAt_const]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
#align norm_div_le norm_div_le
#align norm_sub_le norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
#align norm_div_le_of_le norm_div_le_of_le
#align norm_sub_le_of_le norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm' dist_le_norm_add_norm'
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm dist_le_norm_add_norm
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le' abs_norm_sub_norm_le'
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le abs_norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
#align norm_sub_norm_le' norm_sub_norm_le'
#align norm_sub_norm_le norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
#align dist_norm_norm_le' dist_norm_norm_le'
#align dist_norm_norm_le dist_norm_norm_le
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 652 | 655 | theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by |
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.count from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
section Count
variable [DecidablePred p]
def count (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(List.range n).countP p
#align nat.count Nat.count
@[simp]
theorem count_zero : count p 0 = 0 := by
rw [count, List.range_zero, List.countP, List.countP.go]
#align nat.count_zero Nat.count_zero
def CountSet.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i // i < n ∧ p i } := by
apply Fintype.ofFinset ((Finset.range n).filter p)
intro x
rw [mem_filter, mem_range]
rfl
#align nat.count_set.fintype Nat.CountSet.fintype
scoped[Count] attribute [instance] Nat.CountSet.fintype
open Count
theorem count_eq_card_filter_range (n : ℕ) : count p n = ((range n).filter p).card := by
rw [count, List.countP_eq_length_filter]
rfl
#align nat.count_eq_card_filter_range Nat.count_eq_card_filter_range
theorem count_eq_card_fintype (n : ℕ) : count p n = Fintype.card { k : ℕ // k < n ∧ p k } := by
rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, ← Fintype.card_ofFinset, ← CountSet.fintype]
rfl
#align nat.count_eq_card_fintype Nat.count_eq_card_fintype
theorem count_succ (n : ℕ) : count p (n + 1) = count p n + if p n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [count, List.range_succ, h]
#align nat.count_succ Nat.count_succ
@[mono]
theorem count_monotone : Monotone (count p) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n ↦ by by_cases h : p n <;> simp [count_succ, h]
#align nat.count_monotone Nat.count_monotone
theorem count_add (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count p a + count (fun k ↦ p (a + k)) b := by
have : Disjoint ((range a).filter p) (((range b).map <| addLeftEmbedding a).filter p) := by
apply disjoint_filter_filter
rw [Finset.disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
rintro x hx ⟨c, _, rfl⟩
exact (self_le_add_right _ _).not_lt hx
simp_rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, range_add, filter_union, card_union_of_disjoint this,
filter_map, addLeftEmbedding, card_map]
rfl
#align nat.count_add Nat.count_add
theorem count_add' (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count (fun k ↦ p (k + b)) a + count p b := by
rw [add_comm, count_add, add_comm]
simp_rw [add_comm b]
#align nat.count_add' Nat.count_add'
theorem count_one : count p 1 = if p 0 then 1 else 0 := by simp [count_succ]
#align nat.count_one Nat.count_one
theorem count_succ' (n : ℕ) :
count p (n + 1) = count (fun k ↦ p (k + 1)) n + if p 0 then 1 else 0 := by
rw [count_add', count_one]
#align nat.count_succ' Nat.count_succ'
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem count_lt_count_succ_iff {n : ℕ} : count p n < count p (n + 1) ↔ p n := by
by_cases h : p n <;> simp [count_succ, h]
#align nat.count_lt_count_succ_iff Nat.count_lt_count_succ_iff
theorem count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff {n : ℕ} : count p (n + 1) = count p n + 1 ↔ p n := by
by_cases h : p n <;> simp [h, count_succ]
#align nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff Nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff
theorem count_succ_eq_count_iff {n : ℕ} : count p (n + 1) = count p n ↔ ¬p n := by
by_cases h : p n <;> simp [h, count_succ]
#align nat.count_succ_eq_count_iff Nat.count_succ_eq_count_iff
alias ⟨_, count_succ_eq_succ_count⟩ := count_succ_eq_succ_count_iff
#align nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count Nat.count_succ_eq_succ_count
alias ⟨_, count_succ_eq_count⟩ := count_succ_eq_count_iff
#align nat.count_succ_eq_count Nat.count_succ_eq_count
theorem count_le_cardinal (n : ℕ) : (count p n : Cardinal) ≤ Cardinal.mk { k | p k } := by
rw [count_eq_card_fintype, ← Cardinal.mk_fintype]
exact Cardinal.mk_subtype_mono fun x hx ↦ hx.2
#align nat.count_le_cardinal Nat.count_le_cardinal
theorem lt_of_count_lt_count {a b : ℕ} (h : count p a < count p b) : a < b :=
(count_monotone p).reflect_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_count_lt_count Nat.lt_of_count_lt_count
theorem count_strict_mono {m n : ℕ} (hm : p m) (hmn : m < n) : count p m < count p n :=
(count_lt_count_succ_iff.2 hm).trans_le <| count_monotone _ (Nat.succ_le_iff.2 hmn)
#align nat.count_strict_mono Nat.count_strict_mono
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Count.lean | 133 | 137 | theorem count_injective {m n : ℕ} (hm : p m) (hn : p n) (heq : count p m = count p n) : m = n := by |
by_contra! h : m ≠ n
wlog hmn : m < n
· exact this hn hm heq.symm h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left hmn)
· simpa [heq] using count_strict_mono hm hmn
|
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 694 | 700 | theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by |
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Polynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolynomialExp
#align_import analysis.calculus.bump_function_inner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology
open Polynomial Real Filter Set Function
open scoped Polynomial
def expNegInvGlue (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if x ≤ 0 then 0 else exp (-x⁻¹)
#align exp_neg_inv_glue expNegInvGlue
namespace expNegInvGlue
theorem zero_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : expNegInvGlue x = 0 := by simp [expNegInvGlue, hx]
#align exp_neg_inv_glue.zero_of_nonpos expNegInvGlue.zero_of_nonpos
@[simp] -- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem zero : expNegInvGlue 0 = 0 := zero_of_nonpos le_rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/SmoothTransition.lean | 53 | 54 | theorem pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < expNegInvGlue x := by |
simp [expNegInvGlue, not_le.2 hx, exp_pos]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order
#align_import topology.maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
open Set Filter Function
open TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} {Z : Type*} {ι : Type*} {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
section OpenMap
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
namespace IsOpenMap
protected theorem id : IsOpenMap (@id X) := fun s hs => by rwa [image_id]
#align is_open_map.id IsOpenMap.id
protected theorem comp (hg : IsOpenMap g) (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
IsOpenMap (g ∘ f) := fun s hs => by rw [image_comp]; exact hg _ (hf _ hs)
#align is_open_map.comp IsOpenMap.comp
| Mathlib/Topology/Maps.lean | 338 | 340 | theorem isOpen_range (hf : IsOpenMap f) : IsOpen (range f) := by |
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf _ isOpen_univ
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import combinatorics.composition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
blocks : List ℕ
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
#align composition Composition
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
#align composition_as_set CompositionAsSet
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
#align composition.length Composition.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
#align composition.blocks_length Composition.blocks_length
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
#align composition.blocks_fun Composition.blocksFun
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
#align composition.of_fn_blocks_fun Composition.ofFn_blocksFun
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
#align composition.sum_blocks_fun Composition.sum_blocksFun
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _ _
#align composition.blocks_fun_mem_blocks Composition.blocksFun_mem_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
#align composition.one_le_blocks Composition.one_le_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) i h)
#align composition.one_le_blocks' Composition.one_le_blocks'
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
#align composition.blocks_pos' Composition.blocks_pos'
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
#align composition.one_le_blocks_fun Composition.one_le_blocksFun
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
#align composition.length_le Composition.length_le
theorem length_pos_of_pos (h : 0 < n) : 0 < c.length := by
apply length_pos_of_sum_pos
convert h
exact c.blocks_sum
#align composition.length_pos_of_pos Composition.length_pos_of_pos
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
#align composition.size_up_to Composition.sizeUpTo
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
#align composition.size_up_to_zero Composition.sizeUpTo_zero
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_all_of_le h
#align composition.size_up_to_of_length_le Composition.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
#align composition.size_up_to_length Composition.sizeUpTo_length
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align composition.size_up_to_le Composition.sizeUpTo_le
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
#align composition.size_up_to_succ Composition.sizeUpTo_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
#align composition.size_up_to_succ' Composition.sizeUpTo_succ'
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
#align composition.size_up_to_strict_mono Composition.sizeUpTo_strict_mono
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
#align composition.monotone_size_up_to Composition.monotone_sizeUpTo
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
#align composition.boundary Composition.boundary
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_zero Composition.boundary_zero
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_last Composition.boundary_last
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
#align composition.boundaries Composition.boundaries
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
#align composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length Composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
#align composition.to_composition_as_set Composition.toCompositionAsSet
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align composition.order_emb_of_fin_boundaries Composition.orderEmbOfFin_boundaries
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ _).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
#align composition.embedding Composition.embedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_embedding Composition.coe_embedding
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
#align composition.index_exists Composition.index_exists
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
#align composition.index Composition.index
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
#align composition.lt_size_up_to_index_succ Composition.lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
#align composition.size_up_to_index_le Composition.sizeUpTo_index_le
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
#align composition.inv_embedding Composition.invEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_inv_embedding Composition.coe_invEmbedding
theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
#align composition.embedding_comp_inv Composition.embedding_comp_inv
theorem mem_range_embedding_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin c.length} :
j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i) ↔ c.sizeUpTo i ≤ j ∧ (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i : ℕ).succ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases Set.mem_range.2 h with ⟨k, hk⟩
rw [Fin.ext_iff] at hk
dsimp at hk
rw [← hk]
simp [sizeUpTo_succ', k.is_lt]
· intro h
apply Set.mem_range.2
refine ⟨⟨j - c.sizeUpTo i, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [tsub_lt_iff_left, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact h.2
· exact h.1
· rw [Fin.ext_iff]
exact add_tsub_cancel_of_le h.1
#align composition.mem_range_embedding_iff Composition.mem_range_embedding_iff
theorem disjoint_range {i₁ i₂ : Fin c.length} (h : i₁ ≠ i₂) :
Disjoint (Set.range (c.embedding i₁)) (Set.range (c.embedding i₂)) := by
classical
wlog h' : i₁ < i₂
· exact (this c h.symm (h.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h')).symm
by_contra d
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ :
∃ x : Fin n, x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₁) ∧ x ∈ Set.range (c.embedding i₂) :=
Set.not_disjoint_iff.1 d
have A : (i₁ : ℕ).succ ≤ i₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h'
apply lt_irrefl (x : ℕ)
calc
(x : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (i₁ : ℕ).succ := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₁).2
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo (i₂ : ℕ) := monotone_sum_take _ A
_ ≤ x := (c.mem_range_embedding_iff.1 hx₂).1
#align composition.disjoint_range Composition.disjoint_range
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 399 | 402 | theorem mem_range_embedding (j : Fin n) : j ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) := by |
have : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) ∈ Set.range (c.embedding (c.index j)) :=
Set.mem_range_self _
rwa [c.embedding_comp_inv j] at this
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.witt_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c3019c79074b0619edb4b27553a91b2e82242395"
open MvPolynomial
open Finset hiding map
open Finsupp (single)
--attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂_hom
variable (p : ℕ)
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [DecidableEq R]
noncomputable def wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ R :=
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), monomial (single i (p ^ (n - i))) ((p : R) ^ i)
#align witt_polynomial wittPolynomial
theorem wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
wittPolynomial p R n = ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), C ((p : R) ^ i) * X i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i -
rw [monomial_eq, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
rw [pow_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align witt_polynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
open Witt
open MvPolynomial
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map_wittPolynomial (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) : map f (W n) = W n := by
rw [wittPolynomial, map_sum, wittPolynomial]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [map_monomial, RingHom.map_pow, map_natCast]
#align map_witt_polynomial map_wittPolynomial
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittPolynomial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
constantCoeff (wittPolynomial p R n) = 0 := by
simp only [wittPolynomial, map_sum, constantCoeff_monomial]
rw [sum_eq_zero]
rintro i _
rw [if_neg]
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_gt (pow_pos hp.1.pos _)
#align constant_coeff_witt_polynomial constantCoeff_wittPolynomial
@[simp]
theorem wittPolynomial_zero : wittPolynomial p R 0 = X 0 := by
simp only [wittPolynomial, X, sum_singleton, range_one, pow_zero, zero_add, tsub_self]
#align witt_polynomial_zero wittPolynomial_zero
@[simp]
theorem wittPolynomial_one : wittPolynomial p R 1 = C (p : R) * X 1 + X 0 ^ p := by
simp only [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm, range_one, sum_singleton,
one_mul, pow_one, C_1, pow_zero, tsub_self, tsub_zero]
#align witt_polynomial_one wittPolynomial_one
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/WittPolynomial.lean | 146 | 148 | theorem aeval_wittPolynomial {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] (f : ℕ → A) (n : ℕ) :
aeval f (W_ R n) = ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : A) ^ i * f i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by |
simp [wittPolynomial, AlgHom.map_sum, aeval_monomial, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
#align_import dynamics.circle.rotation_number.translation_number from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open scoped Classical
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
structure CircleDeg1Lift extends ℝ →o ℝ : Type where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
#align circle_deg1_lift CircleDeg1Lift
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mk CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mk
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
#align circle_deg1_lift.monotone CircleDeg1Lift.monotone
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
#align circle_deg1_lift.mono CircleDeg1Lift.mono
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
#align circle_deg1_lift.strict_mono_iff_injective CircleDeg1Lift.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_one
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_one_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_one_add
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.coe_inj -- Use `DFunLike.coe_inj`
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext CircleDeg1Lift.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext_iff CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one f := rfl
one_mul f := rfl
mul_assoc f₁ f₂ f₃ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mul CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_apply CircleDeg1Lift.mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_one CircleDeg1Lift.coe_one
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_has_coe_to_fun CircleDeg1Lift.unitsHasCoeToFun
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.units_coe -- now LHS = RHS
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_inv_apply_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_inv_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_apply_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_apply_inv_apply
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' f g := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_symm CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_inv CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_inv
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.is_unit_iff_bijective CircleDeg1Lift.isUnit_iff_bijective
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_pow CircleDeg1Lift.coe_pow
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.semiconj_by_iff_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.semiconjBy_iff_semiconj
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_iff_commute CircleDeg1Lift.commute_iff_commute
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => Multiplicative.toAdd x + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate CircleDeg1Lift.translate
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_inv_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_pow
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_iterate CircleDeg1Lift.translate_iterate
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_nat_add
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_nat
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_nat
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_int
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_int_add
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_add
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_int
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_nat_add
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_nat
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_of_map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq CircleDeg1Lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm f₁ f₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf f₁ f₂ f₃ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.sup_apply CircleDeg1Lift.sup_apply
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.inf_apply CircleDeg1Lift.inf_apply
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_monotone
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_mono CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_mono
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_mono CircleDeg1Lift.pow_mono
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.pow_monotone
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_le_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_le_of_map_zero
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_le
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.floor_map_map_zero_le
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_lt
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_of_map_zero
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_map_zero
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_floor_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_floor_map_map_zero
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_map_zero
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_bot CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atBot
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_top CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atTop
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.continuous_iff_surjective CircleDeg1Lift.continuous_iff_surjective
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_le_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_le_iff
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff
theorem le_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x ↔ x + m ≤ f x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_lt_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_pos_iff
theorem lt_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m < f^[n] x ↔ x + m < f x := by
simpa only [not_le] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_le_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff
theorem mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero (n : ℕ) : ↑n * ⌊f 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f^[n] 0⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ← zero_add ((n : ℝ) * _)]
apply le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
simp [floor_le]
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero CircleDeg1Lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero
noncomputable section
def transnumAuxSeq (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
(f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq
def translationNumber : ℝ :=
limUnder atTop f.transnumAuxSeq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber
end
-- TODO: choose two different symbols for `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber` and the future
-- `circle_mono_homeo.rotation_number`, then make them `localized notation`s
local notation "τ" => translationNumber
theorem transnumAuxSeq_def : f.transnumAuxSeq = fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_def CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_def
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux {τ' : ℝ} (h : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 τ')) :
τ f = τ' :=
h.limUnder_eq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto_aux CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n] 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <| by
simpa [(· ∘ ·), transnumAuxSeq_def, coe_pow] using
h.comp (Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀ CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n + 1] 0 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ <| (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast h)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀'
theorem transnumAuxSeq_zero : f.transnumAuxSeq 0 = f 0 := by simp [transnumAuxSeq]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_zero CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_zero
theorem transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt (n : ℕ) :
dist (f.transnumAuxSeq n) (f.transnumAuxSeq (n + 1)) < 1 / 2 / 2 ^ n := by
have : 0 < (2 ^ (n + 1) : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
rw [div_div, ← pow_succ', ← abs_of_pos this]
replace := abs_pos.2 (ne_of_gt this)
convert (div_lt_div_right this).2 ((f ^ 2 ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (f ^ 2 ^ n)) using 1
simp_rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq]
rw [← abs_div, sub_div, pow_succ, pow_succ', ← two_mul, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
pow_mul, sq, mul_apply]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_dist_lt CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_aux : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(cauchySeq_of_le_geometric_two 1 fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n).tendsto_limUnder
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
theorem dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le : dist (f 0) (τ f) ≤ 1 :=
f.transnumAuxSeq_zero ▸
dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ 1 (fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n)
f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux (x : ℕ → ℝ) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) (x n) ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => x (2 ^ n) / 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
apply f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.congr_dist (squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) _ _)
· exact fun n => C / 2 ^ n
· intro n
have : 0 < (2 ^ n : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
convert (div_le_div_right this).2 (H (2 ^ n)) using 1
rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq, ← sub_div, abs_div, abs_of_pos this, Real.dist_eq]
· exact mul_zero C ▸ tendsto_const_nhds.mul <| tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp <|
tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_of_dist_bounded_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) ((g ^ n) 0) ≤ C) : τ f = τ g :=
Eq.symm <| g.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <|
f.tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux _ C H
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_dist_bounded CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_one : τ 1 = 0 :=
translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ _ <| by simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_one CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_one
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (H : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
τ g₁ = τ g₂ :=
translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded 2 fun n =>
le_of_lt <| dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy <| H.pow_right n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift}
(H : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) : τ g₁ = τ g₂ :=
translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.2 H
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconj
theorem translationNumber_mul_of_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Commute f g) :
τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_
(f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.add g.tendsto_translationNumber_aux)
simp only [transnumAuxSeq, ← add_div]
refine (f * g).tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux
(fun n ↦ (f ^ n) 0 + (g ^ n) 0) 1 fun n ↦ ?_
rw [h.mul_pow, dist_comm]
exact le_of_lt ((f ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (g ^ n))
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_mul_of_commute CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_units_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : τ ↑f⁻¹ = -τ f :=
eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero.2 <| by
simp [← translationNumber_mul_of_commute (Commute.refl _).units_inv_left]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_units_inv CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, τ (f ^ n) = n * τ f
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, translationNumber_mul_of_commute (Commute.pow_self f n),
translationNumber_pow n, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, one_mul]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_pow
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_zpow (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ∀ n : ℤ, τ (f ^ n : Units _) = n * τ f
| (n : ℕ) => by simp [translationNumber_pow f n]
| -[n+1] => by simp; ring
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_conj_eq (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (g : CircleDeg1Lift) :
τ (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = τ g :=
(translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy (f.mk_semiconjBy g)).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_conj_eq CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_conj_eq
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_conj_eq' (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (g : CircleDeg1Lift) :
τ (↑f⁻¹ * g * f) = τ g :=
translationNumber_conj_eq f⁻¹ g
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_conj_eq' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_conj_eq'
theorem dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le (n : ℕ) :
dist ((f ^ n) 0) (n * f.translationNumber) ≤ 1 :=
f.translationNumber_pow n ▸ (f ^ n).dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le
theorem tendsto_translation_number₀' :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (n + 1) : CircleDeg1Lift) 0 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
refine
tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) (fun n => ?_)
((tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1).comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1))
dsimp
have : (0 : ℝ) < n + 1 := n.cast_add_one_pos
rw [Real.dist_eq, div_sub' _ _ _ (ne_of_gt this), abs_div, ← Real.dist_eq, abs_of_pos this,
Nat.cast_add_one, div_le_div_right this, ← Nat.cast_add_one]
apply dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number₀' CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number₀'
theorem tendsto_translation_number₀ : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (f ^ n) 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast f.tendsto_translation_number₀')
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number₀ CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number₀
theorem tendsto_translationNumber (x : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((f ^ n) x - x) / n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
rw [← translationNumber_conj_eq' (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)]
refine (tendsto_translation_number₀ _).congr fun n ↦ ?_
simp [sub_eq_neg_add, Units.conj_pow']
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber
theorem tendsto_translation_number' (x : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((f ^ (n + 1) : CircleDeg1Lift) x - x) / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
mod_cast (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (f.tendsto_translationNumber x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number' CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number'
theorem translationNumber_mono : Monotone τ := fun f g h =>
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' f.tendsto_translation_number₀ g.tendsto_translation_number₀ fun n => by
gcongr; exact pow_mono h _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_mono CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mono
theorem translationNumber_translate (x : ℝ) : τ (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x) = x :=
translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' _ <| by
simp only [translate_iterate, translate_apply, add_zero, Nat.cast_succ,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (M₀ := ℝ) _ (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), tendsto_const_nhds]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_translate CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_translate
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, f x ≤ x + z) : τ f ≤ z :=
translationNumber_translate z ▸ translationNumber_mono fun x => (hz x).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_le {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, x + z ≤ f x) : z ≤ τ f :=
translationNumber_translate z ▸ translationNumber_mono fun x => (add_comm _ _).trans_le (hz x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_le
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) : τ f ≤ m :=
le_of_tendsto' (f.tendsto_translation_number' x) fun n =>
(div_le_iff' (n.cast_add_one_pos : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr <| sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <|
(coe_pow f (n + 1)).symm ▸ @Nat.cast_add_one ℝ _ n ▸ f.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int h (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add_nat {x : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) : τ f ≤ m :=
@translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f x m h
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_nat
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) : ↑m ≤ τ f :=
ge_of_tendsto' (f.tendsto_translation_number' x) fun n =>
(le_div_iff (n.cast_add_one_pos : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr <| le_sub_iff_add_le'.2 <| by
simp only [coe_pow, mul_comm (m : ℝ), ← Nat.cast_add_one, f.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map h]
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_int_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_nat_le {x : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) : ↑m ≤ τ f :=
@le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f x m h
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_nat_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_nat_le
theorem translationNumber_of_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) : τ f = m :=
le_antisymm (translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f <| le_of_eq h)
(le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f <| le_of_eq h.symm)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_of_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_of_eq_add_int
theorem floor_sub_le_translationNumber (x : ℝ) : ↑⌊f x - x⌋ ≤ τ f :=
le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f <| le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 (floor_le <| f x - x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_sub_le_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.floor_sub_le_translationNumber
theorem translationNumber_le_ceil_sub (x : ℝ) : τ f ≤ ⌈f x - x⌉ :=
translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f <| sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 (le_ceil <| f x - x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_ceil_sub CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_ceil_sub
theorem map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int {n : ℤ} (h : τ f < n) (x : ℝ) : f x < x + n :=
not_le.1 <| mt f.le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le <| not_le.2 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_of_translation_number_lt_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int
theorem map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_nat {n : ℕ} (h : τ f < n) (x : ℝ) : f x < x + n :=
@map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int f n h x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_of_translation_number_lt_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_nat
theorem map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one (x : ℝ) : f x < x + ⌊τ f⌋ + 1 := by
rw [add_assoc]
norm_cast
refine map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int _ ?_ _
push_cast
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_add_floor_translation_number_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one
theorem map_lt_add_translationNumber_add_one (x : ℝ) : f x < x + τ f + 1 :=
calc
f x < x + ⌊τ f⌋ + 1 := f.map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one x
_ ≤ x + τ f + 1 := by gcongr; apply floor_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_add_translation_number_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_add_translationNumber_add_one
theorem lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber {n : ℤ} (h : ↑n < τ f) (x : ℝ) : x + n < f x :=
not_le.1 <| mt f.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int <| not_le.2 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_of_int_lt_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber
theorem lt_map_of_nat_lt_translationNumber {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n < τ f) (x : ℝ) : x + n < f x :=
@lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber f n h x
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_of_nat_lt_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_of_nat_lt_translationNumber
theorem translationNumber_of_map_pow_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} (h : (f ^ n) x = x + m)
(hn : 0 < n) : τ f = m / n := by
have := (f ^ n).translationNumber_of_eq_add_int h
rwa [translationNumber_pow, mul_comm, ← eq_div_iff] at this
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_of_map_pow_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_of_map_pow_eq_add_int
theorem forall_map_sub_of_Icc (P : ℝ → Prop) (h : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, P (f x - x)) (x : ℝ) :
P (f x - x) :=
f.map_fract_sub_fract_eq x ▸ h _ ⟨fract_nonneg _, le_of_lt (fract_lt_one _)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.forall_map_sub_of_Icc CircleDeg1Lift.forall_map_sub_of_Icc
theorem translationNumber_lt_of_forall_lt_add (hf : Continuous f) {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, f x < x + z) :
τ f < z := by
obtain ⟨x, -, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, f y - y ≤ f x - x :=
isCompact_Icc.exists_isMaxOn (nonempty_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
(hf.sub continuous_id).continuousOn
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 <| hz x)
apply translationNumber_le_of_le_add
simp only [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact f.forall_map_sub_of_Icc (fun a => a ≤ f x - x) hx
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_lt_of_forall_lt_add CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_lt_of_forall_lt_add
theorem lt_translationNumber_of_forall_add_lt (hf : Continuous f) {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, x + z < f x) :
z < τ f := by
obtain ⟨x, -, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, f x - x ≤ f y - y
· exact isCompact_Icc.exists_isMinOn (nonempty_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
(hf.sub continuous_id).continuousOn
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.2 <| hz x) ?_
apply le_translationNumber_of_add_le
simp only [← le_sub_iff_add_le']
exact f.forall_map_sub_of_Icc _ hx
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_translation_number_of_forall_add_lt CircleDeg1Lift.lt_translationNumber_of_forall_add_lt
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 930 | 937 | theorem exists_eq_add_translationNumber (hf : Continuous f) : ∃ x, f x = x + τ f := by |
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ x, f x ≤ x + τ f := by
by_contra! H
exact lt_irrefl _ (f.lt_translationNumber_of_forall_add_lt hf H)
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ : ∃ x, x + τ f ≤ f x := by
by_contra! H
exact lt_irrefl _ (f.translationNumber_lt_of_forall_lt_add hf H)
exact intermediate_value_univ₂ hf (continuous_id.add continuous_const) ha hb
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.NatAntidiagonal
#align_import algebra.big_operators.nat_antidiagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
variable {M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N]
namespace Finset
namespace Nat
theorem prod_antidiagonal_succ {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ × ℕ → M} :
(∏ p ∈ antidiagonal (n + 1), f p)
= f (0, n + 1) * ∏ p ∈ antidiagonal n, f (p.1 + 1, p.2) := by
rw [antidiagonal_succ, prod_cons, prod_map]; rfl
#align finset.nat.prod_antidiagonal_succ Finset.Nat.prod_antidiagonal_succ
theorem sum_antidiagonal_succ {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ × ℕ → N} :
(∑ p ∈ antidiagonal (n + 1), f p) = f (0, n + 1) + ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, f (p.1 + 1, p.2) :=
@prod_antidiagonal_succ (Multiplicative N) _ _ _
#align finset.nat.sum_antidiagonal_succ Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_succ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_antidiagonal_swap {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ × ℕ → M} :
∏ p ∈ antidiagonal n, f p.swap = ∏ p ∈ antidiagonal n, f p := by
conv_lhs => rw [← map_swap_antidiagonal, Finset.prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.nat.prod_antidiagonal_swap Finset.Nat.prod_antidiagonal_swap
#align finset.nat.sum_antidiagonal_swap Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_swap
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 42 | 45 | theorem prod_antidiagonal_succ' {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ × ℕ → M} : (∏ p ∈ antidiagonal (n + 1), f p) =
f (n + 1, 0) * ∏ p ∈ antidiagonal n, f (p.1, p.2 + 1) := by |
rw [← prod_antidiagonal_swap, prod_antidiagonal_succ, ← prod_antidiagonal_swap]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 137 | 138 | theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by | rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.measure.giry_monad from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"56f4cd1ef396e9fd389b5d8371ee9ad91d163625"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open ENNReal
open scoped Classical
open Set Filter
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
instance instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace (Measure α) :=
⨆ (s : Set α) (_ : MeasurableSet s), (borel ℝ≥0∞).comap fun μ => μ s
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_space MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableSpace
theorem measurable_coe {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun μ : Measure α => μ s :=
Measurable.of_comap_le <| le_iSup_of_le s <| le_iSup_of_le hs <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_coe MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_coe
theorem measurable_of_measurable_coe (f : β → Measure α)
(h : ∀ (s : Set α), MeasurableSet s → Measurable fun b => f b s) : Measurable f :=
Measurable.of_le_map <|
iSup₂_le fun s hs =>
MeasurableSpace.comap_le_iff_le_map.2 <| by rw [MeasurableSpace.map_comp]; exact h s hs
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe
instance instMeasurableAdd₂ {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} : MeasurableAdd₂ (Measure α) := by
refine ⟨Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
refine Measurable.add ?_ ?_
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp measurable_fst
· exact (Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp measurable_snd
#align measure_theory.measure.has_measurable_add₂ MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableAdd₂
theorem measurable_measure {μ : α → Measure β} :
Measurable μ ↔ ∀ (s : Set β), MeasurableSet s → Measurable fun b => μ b s :=
⟨fun hμ _s hs => (measurable_coe hs).comp hμ, measurable_of_measurable_coe μ⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_measure
theorem measurable_map (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun μ : Measure α => map f μ := by
refine measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [map_apply hf hs]
exact measurable_coe (hf hs)
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_map MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_map
theorem measurable_dirac : Measurable (Measure.dirac : α → Measure α) := by
refine measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator hs
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_dirac
theorem measurable_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable fun μ : Measure α => ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral, hf, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
refine measurable_iSup fun n => Finset.measurable_sum _ fun i _ => ?_
refine Measurable.const_mul ?_ _
exact measurable_coe ((SimpleFunc.eapprox f n).measurableSet_preimage _)
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_lintegral MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_lintegral
def join (m : Measure (Measure α)) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => ∫⁻ μ, μ s ∂m)
(by simp only [measure_empty, lintegral_const, zero_mul])
(by
intro f hf h
simp_rw [measure_iUnion h hf]
apply lintegral_tsum
intro i; exact (measurable_coe (hf i)).aemeasurable)
#align measure_theory.measure.join MeasureTheory.Measure.join
@[simp]
theorem join_apply {m : Measure (Measure α)} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
join m s = ∫⁻ μ, μ s ∂m :=
Measure.ofMeasurable_apply s hs
#align measure_theory.measure.join_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.join_apply
@[simp]
theorem join_zero : (0 : Measure (Measure α)).join = 0 := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [hs, join_apply, lintegral_zero_measure, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.join_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.join_zero
theorem measurable_join : Measurable (join : Measure (Measure α) → Measure α) :=
measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => by
simp only [join_apply hs]; exact measurable_lintegral (measurable_coe hs)
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_join MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_join
theorem lintegral_join {m : Measure (Measure α)} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂join m = ∫⁻ μ, ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ∂m := by
simp_rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, SimpleFunc.lintegral,
join_apply (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_preimage _ _)]
suffices
∀ (s : ℕ → Finset ℝ≥0∞) (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞ → Measure α → ℝ≥0∞), (∀ n r, Measurable (f n r)) →
Monotone (fun n μ => ∑ r ∈ s n, r * f n r μ) →
⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ s n, r * ∫⁻ μ, f n r μ ∂m = ∫⁻ μ, ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ s n, r * f n r μ ∂m by
refine
this (fun n => SimpleFunc.range (SimpleFunc.eapprox f n))
(fun n r μ => μ (SimpleFunc.eapprox f n ⁻¹' {r})) ?_ ?_
· exact fun n r => measurable_coe (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_preimage _ _)
· exact fun n m h μ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (SimpleFunc.monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
intro s f hf hm
rw [lintegral_iSup _ hm]
swap
· exact fun n => Finset.measurable_sum _ fun r _ => (hf _ _).const_mul _
congr
funext n
rw [lintegral_finset_sum (s n)]
· simp_rw [lintegral_const_mul _ (hf _ _)]
· exact fun r _ => (hf _ _).const_mul _
#align measure_theory.measure.lintegral_join MeasureTheory.Measure.lintegral_join
def bind (m : Measure α) (f : α → Measure β) : Measure β :=
join (map f m)
#align measure_theory.measure.bind MeasureTheory.Measure.bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_zero_left (f : α → Measure β) : bind 0 f = 0 := by simp [bind]
#align measure_theory.measure.bind_zero_left MeasureTheory.Measure.bind_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem bind_zero_right (m : Measure α) : bind m (0 : α → Measure β) = 0 := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [bind, hs, join_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
rw [lintegral_map (measurable_coe hs) measurable_zero]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, coe_zero, lintegral_const, zero_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure.bind_zero_right MeasureTheory.Measure.bind_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem bind_zero_right' (m : Measure α) : bind m (fun _ => 0 : α → Measure β) = 0 :=
bind_zero_right m
#align measure_theory.measure.bind_zero_right' MeasureTheory.Measure.bind_zero_right'
@[simp]
theorem bind_apply {m : Measure α} {f : α → Measure β} {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable f) : bind m f s = ∫⁻ a, f a s ∂m := by
rw [bind, join_apply hs, lintegral_map (measurable_coe hs) hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.bind_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.bind_apply
theorem measurable_bind' {g : α → Measure β} (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun m => bind m g :=
measurable_join.comp (measurable_map _ hg)
#align measure_theory.measure.measurable_bind' MeasureTheory.Measure.measurable_bind'
theorem lintegral_bind {m : Measure α} {μ : α → Measure β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : Measurable μ)
(hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂bind m μ = ∫⁻ a, ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ a ∂m :=
(lintegral_join hf).trans (lintegral_map (measurable_lintegral hf) hμ)
#align measure_theory.measure.lintegral_bind MeasureTheory.Measure.lintegral_bind
theorem bind_bind {γ} [MeasurableSpace γ] {m : Measure α} {f : α → Measure β} {g : β → Measure γ}
(hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : bind (bind m f) g = bind m fun a => bind (f a) g := by
ext1 s hs
erw [bind_apply hs hg, bind_apply hs ((measurable_bind' hg).comp hf),
lintegral_bind hf ((measurable_coe hs).comp hg)]
conv_rhs => enter [2, a]; erw [bind_apply hs hg]
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.bind_bind MeasureTheory.Measure.bind_bind
theorem bind_dirac {f : α → Measure β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) : bind (dirac a) f = f a := by
ext1 s hs
erw [bind_apply hs hf, lintegral_dirac' a ((measurable_coe hs).comp hf)]
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.bind_dirac MeasureTheory.Measure.bind_dirac
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/GiryMonad.lean | 205 | 208 | theorem dirac_bind {m : Measure α} : bind m dirac = m := by |
ext1 s hs
simp only [bind_apply hs measurable_dirac, dirac_apply' _ hs, lintegral_indicator 1 hs,
Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Diagonal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
namespace MorphismProperty
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
def StableUnderBaseChange (P : MorphismProperty C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃X Y Y' S : C⦄ ⦃f : X ⟶ S⦄ ⦃g : Y ⟶ S⦄ ⦃f' : Y' ⟶ Y⦄ ⦃g' : Y' ⟶ X⦄ (_ : IsPullback f' g' g f)
(_ : P g), P g'
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange
def StableUnderCobaseChange (P : MorphismProperty C) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃A A' B B' : C⦄ ⦃f : A ⟶ A'⦄ ⦃g : A ⟶ B⦄ ⦃f' : B ⟶ B'⦄ ⦃g' : A' ⟶ B'⦄ (_ : IsPushout g f f' g')
(_ : P f), P f'
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.mk {P : MorphismProperty C} [HasPullbacks C] (hP₁ : RespectsIso P)
(hP₂ : ∀ (X Y S : C) (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) (_ : P g), P (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X)) :
StableUnderBaseChange P := fun X Y Y' S f g f' g' sq hg => by
let e := sq.flip.isoPullback
rw [← hP₁.cancel_left_isIso e.inv, sq.flip.isoPullback_inv_fst]
exact hP₂ _ _ _ f g hg
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.mk CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.mk
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.respectsIso {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderBaseChange P) :
RespectsIso P := by
apply RespectsIso.of_respects_arrow_iso
intro f g e
exact hP (IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso (CommSq.mk e.inv.w))
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.respects_iso CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.respectsIso
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.fst {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderBaseChange P)
{X Y S : C} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [HasPullback f g] (H : P g) :
P (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
hP (IsPullback.of_hasPullback f g).flip H
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.fst CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.fst
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.snd {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderBaseChange P)
{X Y S : C} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [HasPullback f g] (H : P f) :
P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
hP (IsPullback.of_hasPullback f g) H
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.snd CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.snd
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.baseChange_obj [HasPullbacks C] {P : MorphismProperty C}
(hP : StableUnderBaseChange P) {S S' : C} (f : S' ⟶ S) (X : Over S) (H : P X.hom) :
P ((Over.baseChange f).obj X).hom :=
hP.snd X.hom f H
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.base_change_obj CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.baseChange_obj
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.baseChange_map [HasPullbacks C] {P : MorphismProperty C}
(hP : StableUnderBaseChange P) {S S' : C} (f : S' ⟶ S) {X Y : Over S} (g : X ⟶ Y)
(H : P g.left) : P ((Over.baseChange f).map g).left := by
let e :=
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso Y.hom f g.left ≪≫
pullback.congrHom (g.w.trans (Category.comp_id _)) rfl
have : e.inv ≫ pullback.snd = ((Over.baseChange f).map g).left := by
ext <;> dsimp [e] <;> simp
rw [← this, hP.respectsIso.cancel_left_isIso]
exact hP.snd _ _ H
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.base_change_map CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.baseChange_map
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.pullback_map [HasPullbacks C] {P : MorphismProperty C}
(hP : StableUnderBaseChange P) [P.IsStableUnderComposition] {S X X' Y Y' : C} {f : X ⟶ S}
{g : Y ⟶ S} {f' : X' ⟶ S} {g' : Y' ⟶ S} {i₁ : X ⟶ X'} {i₂ : Y ⟶ Y'} (h₁ : P i₁) (h₂ : P i₂)
(e₁ : f = i₁ ≫ f') (e₂ : g = i₂ ≫ g') :
P (pullback.map f g f' g' i₁ i₂ (𝟙 _) ((Category.comp_id _).trans e₁)
((Category.comp_id _).trans e₂)) := by
have :
pullback.map f g f' g' i₁ i₂ (𝟙 _) ((Category.comp_id _).trans e₁)
((Category.comp_id _).trans e₂) =
((pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫
((Over.baseChange _).map (Over.homMk _ e₂.symm : Over.mk g ⟶ Over.mk g')).left) ≫
(pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫
((Over.baseChange g').map (Over.homMk _ e₁.symm : Over.mk f ⟶ Over.mk f')).left := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> simp
rw [this]
apply P.comp_mem <;> rw [hP.respectsIso.cancel_left_isIso]
exacts [hP.baseChange_map _ (Over.homMk _ e₂.symm : Over.mk g ⟶ Over.mk g') h₂,
hP.baseChange_map _ (Over.homMk _ e₁.symm : Over.mk f ⟶ Over.mk f') h₁]
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.pullback_map CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.pullback_map
theorem StableUnderCobaseChange.mk {P : MorphismProperty C} [HasPushouts C] (hP₁ : RespectsIso P)
(hP₂ : ∀ (A B A' : C) (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A ⟶ B) (_ : P f), P (pushout.inr : B ⟶ pushout f g)) :
StableUnderCobaseChange P := fun A A' B B' f g f' g' sq hf => by
let e := sq.flip.isoPushout
rw [← hP₁.cancel_right_isIso _ e.hom, sq.flip.inr_isoPushout_hom]
exact hP₂ _ _ _ f g hf
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change.mk CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange.mk
theorem StableUnderCobaseChange.respectsIso {P : MorphismProperty C}
(hP : StableUnderCobaseChange P) : RespectsIso P :=
RespectsIso.of_respects_arrow_iso _ fun _ _ e => hP (IsPushout.of_horiz_isIso (CommSq.mk e.hom.w))
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change.respects_iso CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange.respectsIso
theorem StableUnderCobaseChange.inl {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderCobaseChange P)
{A B A' : C} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A ⟶ B) [HasPushout f g] (H : P g) :
P (pushout.inl : A' ⟶ pushout f g) :=
hP (IsPushout.of_hasPushout f g) H
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change.inl CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange.inl
theorem StableUnderCobaseChange.inr {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderCobaseChange P)
{A B A' : C} (f : A ⟶ A') (g : A ⟶ B) [HasPushout f g] (H : P f) :
P (pushout.inr : B ⟶ pushout f g) :=
hP (IsPushout.of_hasPushout f g).flip H
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change.inr CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange.inr
theorem StableUnderCobaseChange.op {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderCobaseChange P) :
StableUnderBaseChange P.op := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sq hg => hP sq.unop hg
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change.op CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange.op
theorem StableUnderCobaseChange.unop {P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ} (hP : StableUnderCobaseChange P) :
StableUnderBaseChange P.unop := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sq hg => hP sq.op hg
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_cobase_change.unop CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderCobaseChange.unop
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.op {P : MorphismProperty C} (hP : StableUnderBaseChange P) :
StableUnderCobaseChange P.op := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sq hf => hP sq.unop hf
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.op CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.op
theorem StableUnderBaseChange.unop {P : MorphismProperty Cᵒᵖ} (hP : StableUnderBaseChange P) :
StableUnderCobaseChange P.unop := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ sq hf => hP sq.op hf
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_base_change.unop CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange.unop
section
variable (W : MorphismProperty C)
def IsStableUnderLimitsOfShape (J : Type*) [Category J] : Prop :=
∀ (X₁ X₂ : J ⥤ C) (c₁ : Cone X₁) (c₂ : Cone X₂)
(_ : IsLimit c₁) (h₂ : IsLimit c₂) (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (_ : W.functorCategory J f),
W (h₂.lift (Cone.mk _ (c₁.π ≫ f)))
variable {W}
lemma IsStableUnderLimitsOfShape.lim_map {J : Type*} [Category J]
(hW : W.IsStableUnderLimitsOfShape J) {X Y : J ⥤ C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) [HasLimitsOfShape J C] (hf : W.functorCategory _ f) :
W (lim.map f) :=
hW X Y _ _ (limit.isLimit X) (limit.isLimit Y) f hf
variable (W)
abbrev IsStableUnderProductsOfShape (J : Type*) := W.IsStableUnderLimitsOfShape (Discrete J)
lemma IsStableUnderProductsOfShape.mk (J : Type*)
(hW₀ : W.RespectsIso) [HasProductsOfShape J C]
(hW : ∀ (X₁ X₂ : J → C) (f : ∀ j, X₁ j ⟶ X₂ j) (_ : ∀ (j : J), W (f j)),
W (Pi.map f)) : W.IsStableUnderProductsOfShape J := by
intro X₁ X₂ c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂ f hf
let φ := fun j => f.app (Discrete.mk j)
have hf' := hW _ _ φ (fun j => hf (Discrete.mk j))
refine (hW₀.arrow_mk_iso_iff ?_).2 hf'
refine Arrow.isoMk
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc₁ (limit.isLimit X₁) ≪≫ (Pi.isoLimit _).symm)
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc₂ (limit.isLimit X₂) ≪≫ (Pi.isoLimit _).symm) ?_
apply limit.hom_ext
rintro ⟨j⟩
simp
class IsStableUnderFiniteProducts : Prop :=
isStableUnderProductsOfShape (J : Type) [Finite J] : W.IsStableUnderProductsOfShape J
lemma isStableUnderProductsOfShape_of_isStableUnderFiniteProducts
(J : Type) [Finite J] [W.IsStableUnderFiniteProducts] :
W.IsStableUnderProductsOfShape J :=
IsStableUnderFiniteProducts.isStableUnderProductsOfShape J
end
section Universally
def universally (P : MorphismProperty C) : MorphismProperty C := fun X Y f =>
∀ ⦃X' Y' : C⦄ (i₁ : X' ⟶ X) (i₂ : Y' ⟶ Y) (f' : X' ⟶ Y') (_ : IsPullback f' i₁ i₂ f), P f'
#align category_theory.morphism_property.universally CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.universally
theorem universally_respectsIso (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.universally.RespectsIso := by
constructor
· intro X Y Z e f hf X' Z' i₁ i₂ f' H
have : IsPullback (𝟙 _) (i₁ ≫ e.hom) i₁ e.inv :=
IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso
⟨by rw [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc, e.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]⟩
exact hf _ _ _
(by simpa only [Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Category.id_comp] using this.paste_horiz H)
· intro X Y Z e f hf X' Z' i₁ i₂ f' H
have : IsPullback (𝟙 _) i₂ (i₂ ≫ e.inv) e.inv :=
IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨Category.id_comp _⟩
exact hf _ _ _ (by simpa only [Category.assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id,
Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id] using H.paste_horiz this)
#align category_theory.morphism_property.universally_respects_iso CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.universally_respectsIso
theorem universally_stableUnderBaseChange (P : MorphismProperty C) :
P.universally.StableUnderBaseChange := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H h₁ _ _ _ _ _ H' =>
h₁ _ _ _ (H'.paste_vert H.flip)
#align category_theory.morphism_property.universally_stable_under_base_change CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.universally_stableUnderBaseChange
instance IsStableUnderComposition.universally [HasPullbacks C] (P : MorphismProperty C)
[hP : P.IsStableUnderComposition] : P.universally.IsStableUnderComposition where
comp_mem {X Y Z} f g hf hg X' Z' i₁ i₂ f' H := by
have := pullback.lift_fst _ _ (H.w.trans (Category.assoc _ _ _).symm)
rw [← this] at H ⊢
apply P.comp_mem _ _ _ (hg _ _ _ <| IsPullback.of_hasPullback _ _)
exact hf _ _ _ (H.of_right (pullback.lift_snd _ _ _) (IsPullback.of_hasPullback i₂ g))
#align category_theory.morphism_property.stable_under_composition.universally CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition.universally
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/MorphismProperty/Limits.lean | 285 | 287 | theorem universally_le (P : MorphismProperty C) : P.universally ≤ P := by |
intro X Y f hf
exact hf (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) _ (IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]⟩)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
#align_import data.set.function from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"996b0ff959da753a555053a480f36e5f264d4207"
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {π : α → Type*}
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Function
namespace Set
section restrict
def restrict (s : Set α) (f : ∀ a : α, π a) : ∀ a : s, π a := fun x => f x
#align set.restrict Set.restrict
theorem restrict_eq (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s.restrict f = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_eq Set.restrict_eq
@[simp]
theorem restrict_apply (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (x : s) : s.restrict f x = f x :=
rfl
#align set.restrict_apply Set.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_eq_iff {f : ∀ a, π a} {s : Set α} {g : ∀ a : s, π a} :
restrict s f = g ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : a ∈ s), f a = g ⟨a, ha⟩ :=
funext_iff.trans Subtype.forall
#align set.restrict_eq_iff Set.restrict_eq_iff
theorem eq_restrict_iff {s : Set α} {f : ∀ a : s, π a} {g : ∀ a, π a} :
f = restrict s g ↔ ∀ (a) (ha : a ∈ s), f ⟨a, ha⟩ = g a :=
funext_iff.trans Subtype.forall
#align set.eq_restrict_iff Set.eq_restrict_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_restrict (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : Set.range (s.restrict f) = f '' s :=
(range_comp _ _).trans <| congr_arg (f '' ·) Subtype.range_coe
#align set.range_restrict Set.range_restrict
theorem image_restrict (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) :
s.restrict f '' (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) = f '' (t ∩ s) := by
rw [restrict_eq, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.image_restrict Set.image_restrict
@[simp]
theorem restrict_dite {s : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β)
(g : ∀ a ∉ s, β) :
(s.restrict fun a => if h : a ∈ s then f a h else g a h) = (fun a : s => f a a.2) :=
funext fun a => dif_pos a.2
#align set.restrict_dite Set.restrict_dite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_dite_compl {s : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] (f : ∀ a ∈ s, β)
(g : ∀ a ∉ s, β) :
(sᶜ.restrict fun a => if h : a ∈ s then f a h else g a h) = (fun a : (sᶜ : Set α) => g a a.2) :=
funext fun a => dif_neg a.2
#align set.restrict_dite_compl Set.restrict_dite_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_ite (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
(s.restrict fun a => if a ∈ s then f a else g a) = s.restrict f :=
restrict_dite _ _
#align set.restrict_ite Set.restrict_ite
@[simp]
theorem restrict_ite_compl (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
(sᶜ.restrict fun a => if a ∈ s then f a else g a) = sᶜ.restrict g :=
restrict_dite_compl _ _
#align set.restrict_ite_compl Set.restrict_ite_compl
@[simp]
theorem restrict_piecewise (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
s.restrict (piecewise s f g) = s.restrict f :=
restrict_ite _ _ _
#align set.restrict_piecewise Set.restrict_piecewise
@[simp]
theorem restrict_piecewise_compl (f g : α → β) (s : Set α) [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ s)] :
sᶜ.restrict (piecewise s f g) = sᶜ.restrict g :=
restrict_ite_compl _ _ _
#align set.restrict_piecewise_compl Set.restrict_piecewise_compl
theorem restrict_extend_range (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
(range f).restrict (extend f g g') = fun x => g x.coe_prop.choose := by
classical
exact restrict_dite _ _
#align set.restrict_extend_range Set.restrict_extend_range
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend_compl_range (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
(range f)ᶜ.restrict (extend f g g') = g' ∘ Subtype.val := by
classical
exact restrict_dite_compl _ _
#align set.restrict_extend_compl_range Set.restrict_extend_compl_range
theorem range_extend_subset (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
range (extend f g g') ⊆ range g ∪ g' '' (range f)ᶜ := by
classical
rintro _ ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [extend_def]
split_ifs with h
exacts [Or.inl (mem_range_self _), Or.inr (mem_image_of_mem _ h)]
#align set.range_extend_subset Set.range_extend_subset
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Function.lean | 139 | 143 | theorem range_extend {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : α → γ) (g' : β → γ) :
range (extend f g g') = range g ∪ g' '' (range f)ᶜ := by |
refine (range_extend_subset _ _ _).antisymm ?_
rintro z (⟨x, rfl⟩ | ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩)
exacts [⟨f x, hf.extend_apply _ _ _⟩, ⟨y, extend_apply' _ _ _ hy⟩]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Inhabit
#align_import data.prod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d07245fd37786daa997af4f1a73a49fa3b748408"
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem Prod.map_apply (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) (p : α × β) : Prod.map f g p = (f p.1, g p.2) := rfl
#align prod_map Prod.map_apply
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-08")] alias Prod_map := Prod.map_apply
namespace Prod
@[simp]
theorem mk.eta : ∀ {p : α × β}, (p.1, p.2) = p
| (_, _) => rfl
@[simp]
theorem «forall» {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x, p x) ↔ ∀ a b, p (a, b) :=
⟨fun h a b ↦ h (a, b), fun h ⟨a, b⟩ ↦ h a b⟩
#align prod.forall Prod.forall
@[simp]
theorem «exists» {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x, p x) ↔ ∃ a b, p (a, b) :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, h⟩, fun ⟨a, b, h⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩⟩
#align prod.exists Prod.exists
theorem forall' {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x : α × β, p x.1 x.2) ↔ ∀ a b, p a b :=
Prod.forall
#align prod.forall' Prod.forall'
theorem exists' {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x : α × β, p x.1 x.2) ↔ ∃ a b, p a b :=
Prod.exists
#align prod.exists' Prod.exists'
@[simp]
theorem snd_comp_mk (x : α) : Prod.snd ∘ (Prod.mk x : β → α × β) = id :=
rfl
#align prod.snd_comp_mk Prod.snd_comp_mk
@[simp]
theorem fst_comp_mk (x : α) : Prod.fst ∘ (Prod.mk x : β → α × β) = Function.const β x :=
rfl
#align prod.fst_comp_mk Prod.fst_comp_mk
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem map_mk (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) (a : α) (b : β) : map f g (a, b) = (f a, g b) :=
rfl
#align prod.map_mk Prod.map_mk
theorem map_fst (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) (p : α × β) : (map f g p).1 = f p.1 :=
rfl
#align prod.map_fst Prod.map_fst
theorem map_snd (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) (p : α × β) : (map f g p).2 = g p.2 :=
rfl
#align prod.map_snd Prod.map_snd
theorem map_fst' (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : Prod.fst ∘ map f g = f ∘ Prod.fst :=
funext <| map_fst f g
#align prod.map_fst' Prod.map_fst'
theorem map_snd' (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) : Prod.snd ∘ map f g = g ∘ Prod.snd :=
funext <| map_snd f g
#align prod.map_snd' Prod.map_snd'
theorem map_comp_map {ε ζ : Type*} (f : α → β) (f' : γ → δ) (g : β → ε) (g' : δ → ζ) :
Prod.map g g' ∘ Prod.map f f' = Prod.map (g ∘ f) (g' ∘ f') :=
rfl
#align prod.map_comp_map Prod.map_comp_map
theorem map_map {ε ζ : Type*} (f : α → β) (f' : γ → δ) (g : β → ε) (g' : δ → ζ) (x : α × γ) :
Prod.map g g' (Prod.map f f' x) = Prod.map (g ∘ f) (g' ∘ f') x :=
rfl
#align prod.map_map Prod.map_map
-- Porting note: mathlib3 proof uses `by cc` for the mpr direction
-- Porting note: `@[simp]` tag removed because auto-generated `mk.injEq` simplifies LHS
-- @[simp]
theorem mk.inj_iff {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} : (a₁, b₁) = (a₂, b₂) ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ :=
Iff.of_eq (mk.injEq _ _ _ _)
#align prod.mk.inj_iff Prod.mk.inj_iff
theorem mk.inj_left {α β : Type*} (a : α) : Function.Injective (Prod.mk a : β → α × β) := by
intro b₁ b₂ h
simpa only [true_and, Prod.mk.inj_iff, eq_self_iff_true] using h
#align prod.mk.inj_left Prod.mk.inj_left
theorem mk.inj_right {α β : Type*} (b : β) :
Function.Injective (fun a ↦ Prod.mk a b : α → α × β) := by
intro b₁ b₂ h
simpa only [and_true, eq_self_iff_true, mk.inj_iff] using h
#align prod.mk.inj_right Prod.mk.inj_right
lemma mk_inj_left {a : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} : (a, b₁) = (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ = b₂ := (mk.inj_left _).eq_iff
#align prod.mk_inj_left Prod.mk_inj_left
lemma mk_inj_right {a₁ a₂ : α} {b : β} : (a₁, b) = (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ = a₂ := (mk.inj_right _).eq_iff
#align prod.mk_inj_right Prod.mk_inj_right
| Mathlib/Data/Prod/Basic.lean | 122 | 123 | theorem ext_iff {p q : α × β} : p = q ↔ p.1 = q.1 ∧ p.2 = q.2 := by |
rw [mk.inj_iff]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.EckmannHilton
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
#align_import category_theory.preadditive.of_biproducts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"061ea99a5610cfc72c286aa930d3c1f47f74f3d0"
noncomputable section
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasBinaryBiproducts C]
section
variable (X Y : C)
@[simp]
def leftAdd (f g : X ⟶ Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y)
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.left_add CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.leftAdd
@[simp]
def rightAdd (f g : X ⟶ Y) : X ⟶ Y :=
biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) ≫ biprod.desc f g
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.right_add CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.rightAdd
local infixr:65 " +ₗ " => leftAdd X Y
local infixr:65 " +ᵣ " => rightAdd X Y
theorem isUnital_leftAdd : EckmannHilton.IsUnital (· +ₗ ·) 0 := by
have hr : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.lift (0 : X ⟶ Y) f = f ≫ biprod.inr := by
intro f
ext
· aesop_cat
· simp [biprod.lift_fst, Category.assoc, biprod.inr_fst, comp_zero]
have hl : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.lift f (0 : X ⟶ Y) = f ≫ biprod.inl := by
intro f
ext
· aesop_cat
· simp [biprod.lift_snd, Category.assoc, biprod.inl_snd, comp_zero]
exact {
left_id := fun f => by simp [hr f, leftAdd, Category.assoc, Category.comp_id, biprod.inr_desc],
right_id := fun f => by simp [hl f, leftAdd, Category.assoc, Category.comp_id, biprod.inl_desc]
}
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.is_unital_left_add CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.isUnital_leftAdd
theorem isUnital_rightAdd : EckmannHilton.IsUnital (· +ᵣ ·) 0 := by
have h₂ : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.desc (0 : X ⟶ Y) f = biprod.snd ≫ f := by
intro f
ext
· aesop_cat
· simp only [biprod.inr_desc, BinaryBicone.inr_snd_assoc]
have h₁ : ∀ f : X ⟶ Y, biprod.desc f (0 : X ⟶ Y) = biprod.fst ≫ f := by
intro f
ext
· aesop_cat
· simp only [biprod.inr_desc, BinaryBicone.inr_fst_assoc, zero_comp]
exact {
left_id := fun f => by simp [h₂ f, rightAdd, biprod.lift_snd_assoc, Category.id_comp],
right_id := fun f => by simp [h₁ f, rightAdd, biprod.lift_fst_assoc, Category.id_comp]
}
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.is_unital_right_add CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.isUnital_rightAdd
theorem distrib (f g h k : X ⟶ Y) : (f +ᵣ g) +ₗ h +ᵣ k = (f +ₗ h) +ᵣ g +ₗ k := by
let diag : X ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Y := biprod.lift (biprod.desc f g) (biprod.desc h k)
have hd₁ : biprod.inl ≫ diag = biprod.lift f h := by ext <;> simp [diag]
have hd₂ : biprod.inr ≫ diag = biprod.lift g k := by ext <;> simp [diag]
have h₁ : biprod.lift (f +ᵣ g) (h +ᵣ k) = biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) ≫ diag := by
ext <;> aesop_cat
have h₂ : diag ≫ biprod.desc (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) = biprod.desc (f +ₗ h) (g +ₗ k) := by
ext <;> simp [reassoc_of% hd₁, reassoc_of% hd₂]
rw [leftAdd, h₁, Category.assoc, h₂, rightAdd]
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.distrib CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.distrib
def addCommMonoidHomOfHasBinaryBiproducts : AddCommMonoid (X ⟶ Y) where
add := (· +ᵣ ·)
add_assoc :=
(EckmannHilton.mul_assoc (isUnital_leftAdd X Y) (isUnital_rightAdd X Y) (distrib X Y)).assoc
zero := 0
zero_add := (isUnital_rightAdd X Y).left_id
add_zero := (isUnital_rightAdd X Y).right_id
add_comm :=
(EckmannHilton.mul_comm (isUnital_leftAdd X Y) (isUnital_rightAdd X Y) (distrib X Y)).comm
nsmul := letI : Add (X ⟶ Y) := ⟨(· +ᵣ ·)⟩; nsmulRec
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.add_comm_monoid_hom_of_has_binary_biproducts CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.addCommMonoidHomOfHasBinaryBiproducts
end
section
variable {X Y Z : C}
attribute [local instance] addCommMonoidHomOfHasBinaryBiproducts
theorem add_eq_right_addition (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f + g = biprod.lift (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) ≫ biprod.desc f g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.add_eq_right_addition CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.add_eq_right_addition
theorem add_eq_left_addition (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f + g = biprod.lift f g ≫ biprod.desc (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) :=
congr_fun₂ (EckmannHilton.mul (isUnital_leftAdd X Y) (isUnital_rightAdd X Y) (distrib X Y)).symm f
g
#align category_theory.semiadditive_of_binary_biproducts.add_eq_left_addition CategoryTheory.SemiadditiveOfBinaryBiproducts.add_eq_left_addition
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/OfBiproducts.lean | 129 | 132 | theorem add_comp (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : (f + g) ≫ h = f ≫ h + g ≫ h := by |
simp only [add_eq_right_addition, Category.assoc]
congr
ext <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Order
#align_import data.finsupp.multiset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59694bd07f0a39c5beccba34bd9f413a160782bf"
open Finset
variable {α β ι : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
def toMultiset : (α →₀ ℕ) →+ Multiset α where
toFun f := Finsupp.sum f fun a n => n • {a}
-- Porting note: times out if h is not specified
map_add' _f _g := sum_add_index' (h := fun a n => n • ({a} : Multiset α))
(fun _ ↦ zero_nsmul _) (fun _ ↦ add_nsmul _)
map_zero' := sum_zero_index
theorem toMultiset_zero : toMultiset (0 : α →₀ ℕ) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.to_multiset_zero Finsupp.toMultiset_zero
theorem toMultiset_add (m n : α →₀ ℕ) : toMultiset (m + n) = toMultiset m + toMultiset n :=
toMultiset.map_add m n
#align finsupp.to_multiset_add Finsupp.toMultiset_add
theorem toMultiset_apply (f : α →₀ ℕ) : toMultiset f = f.sum fun a n => n • {a} :=
rfl
#align finsupp.to_multiset_apply Finsupp.toMultiset_apply
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_single (a : α) (n : ℕ) : toMultiset (single a n) = n • {a} := by
rw [toMultiset_apply, sum_single_index]; apply zero_nsmul
#align finsupp.to_multiset_single Finsupp.toMultiset_single
theorem toMultiset_sum {f : ι → α →₀ ℕ} (s : Finset ι) :
Finsupp.toMultiset (∑ i ∈ s, f i) = ∑ i ∈ s, Finsupp.toMultiset (f i) :=
map_sum Finsupp.toMultiset _ _
#align finsupp.to_multiset_sum Finsupp.toMultiset_sum
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Multiset.lean | 61 | 63 | theorem toMultiset_sum_single (s : Finset ι) (n : ℕ) :
Finsupp.toMultiset (∑ i ∈ s, single i n) = n • s.val := by |
simp_rw [toMultiset_sum, Finsupp.toMultiset_single, sum_nsmul, sum_multiset_singleton]
|
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Quotients
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter
#align_import model_theory.ultraproducts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f1ae620609496a37534c2ab3640b641d5be8b6f0"
universe u v
variable {α : Type*} (M : α → Type*) (u : Ultrafilter α)
open FirstOrder Filter
open Filter
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} [∀ a, L.Structure (M a)]
namespace Ultraproduct
instance setoidPrestructure : L.Prestructure ((u : Filter α).productSetoid M) :=
{ (u : Filter α).productSetoid M with
toStructure :=
{ funMap := fun {n} f x a => funMap f fun i => x i a
RelMap := fun {n} r x => ∀ᶠ a : α in u, RelMap r fun i => x i a }
fun_equiv := fun {n} f x y xy => by
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 xy) fun a ha => ?_
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at ha
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ha]
rel_equiv := fun {n} r x y xy => by
rw [← iff_eq_eq]
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hy => ?_⟩
· refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx (iInter_mem.2 xy)) ?_
rintro a ⟨ha1, ha2⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at *
rw [← funext ha2]
exact ha1
· refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hy (iInter_mem.2 xy)) ?_
rintro a ⟨ha1, ha2⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at *
rw [funext ha2]
exact ha1 }
#align first_order.language.ultraproduct.setoid_prestructure FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.setoidPrestructure
variable {M} {u}
instance «structure» : L.Structure ((u : Filter α).Product M) :=
Language.quotientStructure
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.ultraproduct.Structure FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.structure
theorem funMap_cast {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → ∀ a, M a) :
(funMap f fun i => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M)) =
(fun a => funMap f fun i => x i a : (u : Filter α).Product M) := by
apply funMap_quotient_mk'
#align first_order.language.ultraproduct.fun_map_cast FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.funMap_cast
theorem term_realize_cast {β : Type*} (x : β → ∀ a, M a) (t : L.Term β) :
(t.realize fun i => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M)) =
(fun a => t.realize fun i => x i a : (u : Filter α).Product M) := by
convert @Term.realize_quotient_mk' L _ ((u : Filter α).productSetoid M)
(Ultraproduct.setoidPrestructure M u) _ t x using 2
ext a
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ t_ih => simp only [Term.realize, t_ih]; rfl
#align first_order.language.ultraproduct.term_realize_cast FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.term_realize_cast
variable [∀ a : α, Nonempty (M a)]
theorem boundedFormula_realize_cast {β : Type*} {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula β n)
(x : β → ∀ a, M a) (v : Fin n → ∀ a, M a) :
(φ.Realize (fun i : β => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M))
(fun i => (v i : (u : Filter α).Product M))) ↔
∀ᶠ a : α in u, φ.Realize (fun i : β => x i a) fun i => v i a := by
letI := (u : Filter α).productSetoid M
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m _ _ ih ih' k φ ih
· simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, eventually_const]
· have h2 : ∀ a : α, (Sum.elim (fun i : β => x i a) fun i => v i a) = fun i => Sum.elim x v i a :=
fun a => funext fun i => Sum.casesOn i (fun i => rfl) fun i => rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, h2, term_realize_cast]
erw [(Sum.comp_elim ((↑) : (∀ a, M a) → (u : Filter α).Product M) x v).symm,
term_realize_cast, term_realize_cast]
exact Quotient.eq''
· have h2 : ∀ a : α, (Sum.elim (fun i : β => x i a) fun i => v i a) = fun i => Sum.elim x v i a :=
fun a => funext fun i => Sum.casesOn i (fun i => rfl) fun i => rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, h2]
erw [(Sum.comp_elim ((↑) : (∀ a, M a) → (u : Filter α).Product M) x v).symm]
conv_lhs => enter [2, i]; erw [term_realize_cast]
apply relMap_quotient_mk'
· simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ih v, ih' v]
rw [Ultrafilter.eventually_imp]
· simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize]
apply Iff.trans (b := ∀ m : ∀ a : α, M a,
φ.Realize (fun i : β => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M))
(Fin.snoc (((↑) : (∀ a, M a) → (u : Filter α).Product M) ∘ v)
(m : (u : Filter α).Product M)))
· exact Quotient.forall
have h' :
∀ (m : ∀ a, M a) (a : α),
(fun i : Fin (k + 1) => (Fin.snoc v m : _ → ∀ a, M a) i a) =
Fin.snoc (fun i : Fin k => v i a) (m a) := by
refine fun m a => funext (Fin.reverseInduction ?_ fun i _ => ?_)
· simp only [Fin.snoc_last]
· simp only [Fin.snoc_castSucc]
simp only [← Fin.comp_snoc]
simp only [Function.comp, ih, h']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· contrapose! h
simp_rw [← Ultrafilter.eventually_not, not_forall] at h
refine
⟨fun a : α =>
Classical.epsilon fun m : M a =>
¬φ.Realize (fun i => x i a) (Fin.snoc (fun i => v i a) m),
?_⟩
rw [← Ultrafilter.eventually_not]
exact Filter.mem_of_superset h fun a ha => Classical.epsilon_spec ha
· rw [Filter.eventually_iff] at *
exact Filter.mem_of_superset h fun a ha => ha (m a)
#align first_order.language.ultraproduct.bounded_formula_realize_cast FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.boundedFormula_realize_cast
theorem realize_formula_cast {β : Type*} (φ : L.Formula β) (x : β → ∀ a, M a) :
(φ.Realize fun i => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M)) ↔
∀ᶠ a : α in u, φ.Realize fun i => x i a := by
simp_rw [Formula.Realize, ← boundedFormula_realize_cast φ x, iff_eq_eq]
exact congr rfl (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align first_order.language.ultraproduct.realize_formula_cast FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.realize_formula_cast
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Ultraproducts.lean | 156 | 160 | theorem sentence_realize (φ : L.Sentence) :
(u : Filter α).Product M ⊨ φ ↔ ∀ᶠ a : α in u, M a ⊨ φ := by |
simp_rw [Sentence.Realize]
erw [← realize_formula_cast φ, iff_eq_eq]
exact congr rfl (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.variables from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Vars
def vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.toFinset
#align mv_polynomial.vars MvPolynomial.vars
theorem vars_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.vars = p.degrees.toFinset := by
rw [vars]
convert rfl
#align mv_polynomial.vars_def MvPolynomial.vars_def
@[simp]
theorem vars_0 : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
#align mv_polynomial.vars_0 MvPolynomial.vars_0
@[simp]
theorem vars_monomial (h : r ≠ 0) : (monomial s r).vars = s.support := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ h, Finsupp.toFinset_toMultiset]
#align mv_polynomial.vars_monomial MvPolynomial.vars_monomial
@[simp]
theorem vars_C : (C r : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.vars_C MvPolynomial.vars_C
@[simp]
theorem vars_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = {n} := by
rw [X, vars_monomial (one_ne_zero' R), Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℕ)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.vars_X MvPolynomial.vars_X
theorem mem_vars (i : σ) : i ∈ p.vars ↔ ∃ d ∈ p.support, i ∈ d.support := by
classical simp only [vars_def, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_degrees, mem_support_iff, exists_prop]
#align mv_polynomial.mem_vars MvPolynomial.mem_vars
theorem mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {x : σ →₀ ℕ} (H : x ∈ f.support)
{v : σ} (h : v ∉ vars f) : x v = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact (mem_vars v).mpr ⟨x, H, Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr h⟩
#align mv_polynomial.mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero MvPolynomial.mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero
theorem vars_add_subset [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).vars ⊆ p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
intro x hx
simp only [vars_def, Finset.mem_union, Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hx ⊢
simpa using Multiset.mem_of_le (degrees_add _ _) hx
#align mv_polynomial.vars_add_subset MvPolynomial.vars_add_subset
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Variables.lean | 115 | 119 | theorem vars_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.vars q.vars) :
(p + q).vars = p.vars ∪ q.vars := by |
refine (vars_add_subset p q).antisymm fun x hx => ?_
simp only [vars_def, Multiset.disjoint_toFinset] at h hx ⊢
rwa [degrees_add_of_disjoint h, Multiset.toFinset_union]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
import Mathlib.Data.List.Enum
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.List.Zip
#align_import data.list.range from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7b78d1776212a91ecc94cf601f83bdcc46b04213"
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u}
@[simp] theorem range'_one {step} : range' s 1 step = [s] := rfl
#align list.length_range' List.length_range'
#align list.range'_eq_nil List.range'_eq_nil
#align list.mem_range' List.mem_range'_1
#align list.map_add_range' List.map_add_range'
#align list.map_sub_range' List.map_sub_range'
#align list.chain_succ_range' List.chain_succ_range'
#align list.chain_lt_range' List.chain_lt_range'
theorem pairwise_lt_range' : ∀ s n (step := 1) (_ : 0 < step := by simp),
Pairwise (· < ·) (range' s n step)
| _, 0, _, _ => Pairwise.nil
| s, n + 1, _, h => chain_iff_pairwise.1 (chain_lt_range' s n h)
#align list.pairwise_lt_range' List.pairwise_lt_range'
theorem nodup_range' (s n : ℕ) (step := 1) (h : 0 < step := by simp) : Nodup (range' s n step) :=
(pairwise_lt_range' s n step h).imp _root_.ne_of_lt
#align list.nodup_range' List.nodup_range'
#align list.range'_append List.range'_append
#align list.range'_sublist_right List.range'_sublist_right
#align list.range'_subset_right List.range'_subset_right
#align list.nth_range' List.get?_range'
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem nthLe_range' {n m step} (i) (H : i < (range' n m step).length) :
nthLe (range' n m step) i H = n + step * i := get_range' i H
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem nthLe_range'_1 {n m} (i) (H : i < (range' n m).length) :
nthLe (range' n m) i H = n + i := by simp
#align list.nth_le_range' List.nthLe_range'_1
#align list.range'_concat List.range'_concat
#align list.range_core List.range.loop
#align list.range_core_range' List.range_loop_range'
#align list.range_eq_range' List.range_eq_range'
#align list.range_succ_eq_map List.range_succ_eq_map
#align list.range'_eq_map_range List.range'_eq_map_range
#align list.length_range List.length_range
#align list.range_eq_nil List.range_eq_nil
theorem pairwise_lt_range (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· < ·) (range n) := by
simp (config := {decide := true}) only [range_eq_range', pairwise_lt_range']
#align list.pairwise_lt_range List.pairwise_lt_range
theorem pairwise_le_range (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· ≤ ·) (range n) :=
Pairwise.imp (@le_of_lt ℕ _) (pairwise_lt_range _)
#align list.pairwise_le_range List.pairwise_le_range
theorem take_range (m n : ℕ) : take m (range n) = range (min m n) := by
apply List.ext_get
· simp
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) [← get_take, Nat.lt_min]
theorem nodup_range (n : ℕ) : Nodup (range n) := by
simp (config := {decide := true}) only [range_eq_range', nodup_range']
#align list.nodup_range List.nodup_range
#align list.range_sublist List.range_sublist
#align list.range_subset List.range_subset
#align list.mem_range List.mem_range
#align list.not_mem_range_self List.not_mem_range_self
#align list.self_mem_range_succ List.self_mem_range_succ
#align list.nth_range List.get?_range
#align list.range_succ List.range_succ
#align list.range_zero List.range_zero
theorem chain'_range_succ (r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) :
Chain' r (range n.succ) ↔ ∀ m < n, r m m.succ := by
rw [range_succ]
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [range_succ]
simp only [append_assoc, singleton_append, chain'_append_cons_cons, chain'_singleton,
and_true_iff]
rw [hn, forall_lt_succ]
#align list.chain'_range_succ List.chain'_range_succ
theorem chain_range_succ (r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) (n a : ℕ) :
Chain r a (range n.succ) ↔ r a 0 ∧ ∀ m < n, r m m.succ := by
rw [range_succ_eq_map, chain_cons, and_congr_right_iff, ← chain'_range_succ, range_succ_eq_map]
exact fun _ => Iff.rfl
#align list.chain_range_succ List.chain_range_succ
#align list.range_add List.range_add
#align list.iota_eq_reverse_range' List.iota_eq_reverse_range'
#align list.length_iota List.length_iota
theorem pairwise_gt_iota (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· > ·) (iota n) := by
simpa only [iota_eq_reverse_range', pairwise_reverse] using pairwise_lt_range' 1 n
#align list.pairwise_gt_iota List.pairwise_gt_iota
theorem nodup_iota (n : ℕ) : Nodup (iota n) :=
(pairwise_gt_iota n).imp _root_.ne_of_gt
#align list.nodup_iota List.nodup_iota
#align list.mem_iota List.mem_iota
#align list.reverse_range' List.reverse_range'
def finRange (n : ℕ) : List (Fin n) :=
(range n).pmap Fin.mk fun _ => List.mem_range.1
#align list.fin_range List.finRange
@[simp]
theorem finRange_zero : finRange 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align list.fin_range_zero List.finRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mem_finRange {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) : a ∈ finRange n :=
mem_pmap.2
⟨a.1, mem_range.2 a.2, by
cases a
rfl⟩
#align list.mem_fin_range List.mem_finRange
theorem nodup_finRange (n : ℕ) : (finRange n).Nodup :=
(Pairwise.pmap (nodup_range n) _) fun _ _ _ _ => @Fin.ne_of_vne _ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩
#align list.nodup_fin_range List.nodup_finRange
@[simp]
theorem length_finRange (n : ℕ) : (finRange n).length = n := by
rw [finRange, length_pmap, length_range]
#align list.length_fin_range List.length_finRange
@[simp]
theorem finRange_eq_nil {n : ℕ} : finRange n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_finRange]
#align list.fin_range_eq_nil List.finRange_eq_nil
theorem pairwise_lt_finRange (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· < ·) (finRange n) :=
(List.pairwise_lt_range n).pmap (by simp) (by simp)
theorem pairwise_le_finRange (n : ℕ) : Pairwise (· ≤ ·) (finRange n) :=
(List.pairwise_le_range n).pmap (by simp) (by simp)
#align list.enum_from_map_fst List.enumFrom_map_fst
#align list.enum_map_fst List.enum_map_fst
theorem enum_eq_zip_range (l : List α) : l.enum = (range l.length).zip l :=
zip_of_prod (enum_map_fst _) (enum_map_snd _)
#align list.enum_eq_zip_range List.enum_eq_zip_range
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Range.lean | 182 | 183 | theorem unzip_enum_eq_prod (l : List α) : l.enum.unzip = (range l.length, l) := by |
simp only [enum_eq_zip_range, unzip_zip, length_range]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.set.intervals.monoid from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"aba57d4d3dae35460225919dcd82fe91355162f9"
namespace Set
variable {M : Type*} [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid M] [ExistsAddOfLE M] (a b c d : M)
theorem Ici_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ici a) (Ici (a + d)) := by
refine
⟨fun x h => add_le_add_right (mem_Ici.mp h) _, (add_left_injective d).injOn, fun _ h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ici.mp h)
rw [mem_Ici, add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right] at h
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw [add_right_comm]⟩
#align set.Ici_add_bij Set.Ici_add_bij
theorem Ioi_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ioi a) (Ioi (a + d)) := by
refine
⟨fun x h => add_lt_add_right (mem_Ioi.mp h) _, fun _ _ _ _ h => add_right_cancel h, fun _ h =>
?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ioi.mp h).le
rw [mem_Ioi, add_right_comm, add_lt_add_iff_right] at h
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw [add_right_comm]⟩
#align set.Ioi_add_bij Set.Ioi_add_bij
theorem Icc_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Icc a b) (Icc (a + d) (b + d)) := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iic]
exact
(Ici_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_le_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
le_of_add_le_add_right hx.2
#align set.Icc_add_bij Set.Icc_add_bij
theorem Ioo_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ioo a b) (Ioo (a + d) (b + d)) := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iio]
exact
(Ioi_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_lt_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
lt_of_add_lt_add_right hx.2
#align set.Ioo_add_bij Set.Ioo_add_bij
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Set/Monoid.lean | 58 | 62 | theorem Ioc_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ioc a b) (Ioc (a + d) (b + d)) := by |
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ioi_inter_Iic]
exact
(Ioi_add_bij a d).inter_mapsTo (fun x hx => add_le_add_right hx _) fun x hx =>
le_of_add_le_add_right hx.2
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 196 | 197 | theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by | rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import topology.metric_space.pi_nat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"49b7f94aab3a3bdca1f9f34c5d818afb253b3993"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open TopologicalSpace Set Metric Filter Function
attribute [local simp] pow_le_pow_iff_right one_lt_two inv_le_inv zero_le_two zero_lt_two
variable {E : ℕ → Type*}
namespace PiNat
irreducible_def firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : ℕ :=
if h : x ≠ y then Nat.find (ne_iff.1 h) else 0
#align pi_nat.first_diff PiNat.firstDiff
theorem apply_firstDiff_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) :
x (firstDiff x y) ≠ y (firstDiff x y) := by
rw [firstDiff_def, dif_pos h]
exact Nat.find_spec (ne_iff.1 h)
#align pi_nat.apply_first_diff_ne PiNat.apply_firstDiff_ne
theorem apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (hn : n < firstDiff x y) : x n = y n := by
rw [firstDiff_def] at hn
split_ifs at hn with h
· convert Nat.find_min (ne_iff.1 h) hn
simp
· exact (not_lt_zero' hn).elim
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_lt_first_diff PiNat.apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff
theorem firstDiff_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : firstDiff x y = firstDiff y x := by
simp only [firstDiff_def, ne_comm]
#align pi_nat.first_diff_comm PiNat.firstDiff_comm
theorem min_firstDiff_le (x y z : ∀ n, E n) (h : x ≠ z) :
min (firstDiff x y) (firstDiff y z) ≤ firstDiff x z := by
by_contra! H
rw [lt_min_iff] at H
refine apply_firstDiff_ne h ?_
calc
x (firstDiff x z) = y (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.1
_ = z (firstDiff x z) := apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff H.2
#align pi_nat.min_first_diff_le PiNat.min_firstDiff_le
def cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : Set (∀ n, E n) :=
{ y | ∀ i, i < n → y i = x i }
#align pi_nat.cylinder PiNat.cylinder
theorem cylinder_eq_pi (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
cylinder x n = Set.pi (Finset.range n : Set ℕ) fun i : ℕ => {x i} := by
ext y
simp [cylinder]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_pi PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_zero (x : ∀ n, E n) : cylinder x 0 = univ := by simp [cylinder_eq_pi]
#align pi_nat.cylinder_zero PiNat.cylinder_zero
theorem cylinder_anti (x : ∀ n, E n) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : cylinder x n ⊆ cylinder x m :=
fun _y hy i hi => hy i (hi.trans_le h)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_anti PiNat.cylinder_anti
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder_iff {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ ∀ i < n, y i = x i :=
Iff.rfl
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff
theorem self_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : x ∈ cylinder x n := by simp
#align pi_nat.self_mem_cylinder PiNat.self_mem_cylinder
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_eq {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ cylinder y n = cylinder x n := by
constructor
· intro hy
apply Subset.antisymm
· intro z hz i hi
rw [← hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro z hz i hi
rw [hy i hi]
exact hz i hi
· intro h
rw [← h]
exact self_mem_cylinder _ _
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_eq PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_eq
theorem mem_cylinder_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ x ∈ cylinder y n := by
simp [mem_cylinder_iff_eq, eq_comm]
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_comm PiNat.mem_cylinder_comm
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff {x y : ∀ n, E n} (hne : x ≠ y) (i : ℕ) :
x ∈ cylinder y i ↔ i ≤ firstDiff x y := by
constructor
· intro h
by_contra!
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (h _ this)
· intro hi j hj
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hj.trans_le hi)
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_le_first_diff PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_le_firstDiff
theorem mem_cylinder_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) : x ∈ cylinder y (firstDiff x y) := fun _i hi =>
apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff hi
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_first_diff PiNat.mem_cylinder_firstDiff
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff (x y : ∀ n, E n) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ firstDiff x y) :
cylinder x n = cylinder y n := by
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq]
intro i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le hn)
#align pi_nat.cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_first_diff PiNat.cylinder_eq_cylinder_of_le_firstDiff
theorem iUnion_cylinder_update (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) :
⋃ k, cylinder (update x n k) (n + 1) = cylinder x n := by
ext y
simp only [mem_cylinder_iff, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩ i hi
simpa [hi.ne] using hk i (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi)
· intro H
refine ⟨y n, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rcases Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hi with (h'i | rfl)
· simp [H i h'i, h'i.ne]
· simp
#align pi_nat.Union_cylinder_update PiNat.iUnion_cylinder_update
theorem update_mem_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) (y : E n) : update x n y ∈ cylinder x n :=
mem_cylinder_iff.2 fun i hi => by simp [hi.ne]
#align pi_nat.update_mem_cylinder PiNat.update_mem_cylinder
protected def dist : Dist (∀ n, E n) :=
⟨fun x y => if x ≠ y then (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y else 0⟩
#align pi_nat.has_dist PiNat.dist
attribute [local instance] PiNat.dist
theorem dist_eq_of_ne {x y : ∀ n, E n} (h : x ≠ y) : dist x y = (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ firstDiff x y := by
simp [dist, h]
#align pi_nat.dist_eq_of_ne PiNat.dist_eq_of_ne
protected theorem dist_self (x : ∀ n, E n) : dist x x = 0 := by simp [dist]
#align pi_nat.dist_self PiNat.dist_self
protected theorem dist_comm (x y : ∀ n, E n) : dist x y = dist y x := by
simp [dist, @eq_comm _ x y, firstDiff_comm]
#align pi_nat.dist_comm PiNat.dist_comm
protected theorem dist_nonneg (x y : ∀ n, E n) : 0 ≤ dist x y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· simp [dist]
· simp [dist, h, zero_le_two]
#align pi_nat.dist_nonneg PiNat.dist_nonneg
theorem dist_triangle_nonarch (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x z with (rfl | hxz)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self x, PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hxy)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y z with (rfl | hyz)
· simp
simp only [dist_eq_of_ne, hxz, hxy, hyz, inv_le_inv, one_div, inv_pow, zero_lt_two, Ne,
not_false_iff, le_max_iff, pow_le_pow_iff_right, one_lt_two, pow_pos,
min_le_iff.1 (min_firstDiff_le x y z hxz)]
#align pi_nat.dist_triangle_nonarch PiNat.dist_triangle_nonarch
protected theorem dist_triangle (x y z : ∀ n, E n) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
calc
dist x z ≤ max (dist x y) (dist y z) := dist_triangle_nonarch x y z
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y z := max_le_add_of_nonneg (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _) (PiNat.dist_nonneg _ _)
#align pi_nat.dist_triangle PiNat.dist_triangle
protected theorem eq_of_dist_eq_zero (x y : ∀ n, E n) (hxy : dist x y = 0) : x = y := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h); · rfl
simp [dist_eq_of_ne h] at hxy
#align pi_nat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
theorem mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} :
y ∈ cylinder x n ↔ dist y x ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_self]
suffices (∀ i : ℕ, i < n → y i = x i) ↔ n ≤ firstDiff y x by simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
constructor
· intro hy
by_contra! H
exact apply_firstDiff_ne hne (hy _ H)
· intro h i hi
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_le h)
#align pi_nat.mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le PiNat.mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le
theorem apply_eq_of_dist_lt {x y : ∀ n, E n} {n : ℕ} (h : dist x y < (1 / 2) ^ n) {i : ℕ}
(hi : i ≤ n) : x i = y i := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· rfl
have : n < firstDiff x y := by
simpa [dist_eq_of_ne hne, inv_lt_inv, pow_lt_pow_iff_right, one_lt_two] using h
exact apply_eq_of_lt_firstDiff (hi.trans_lt this)
#align pi_nat.apply_eq_of_dist_lt PiNat.apply_eq_of_dist_lt
theorem lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder {α : Type*}
[PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : (∀ n, E n) → α} :
(∀ x y : ∀ n, E n, dist (f x) (f y) ≤ dist x y) ↔
∀ x y n, y ∈ cylinder x n → dist (f x) (f y) ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
constructor
· intro H x y n hxy
apply (H x y).trans
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hxy
· intro H x y
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· simp [PiNat.dist_nonneg]
rw [dist_eq_of_ne hne]
apply H x y (firstDiff x y)
rw [firstDiff_comm]
exact mem_cylinder_firstDiff _ _
#align pi_nat.lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder PiNat.lipschitz_with_one_iff_forall_dist_image_le_of_mem_cylinder
variable (E)
variable [∀ n, TopologicalSpace (E n)] [∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n)]
theorem isOpen_cylinder (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ) : IsOpen (cylinder x n) := by
rw [PiNat.cylinder_eq_pi]
exact isOpen_set_pi (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun a _ => isOpen_discrete _
#align pi_nat.is_open_cylinder PiNat.isOpen_cylinder
theorem isTopologicalBasis_cylinders :
IsTopologicalBasis { s : Set (∀ n, E n) | ∃ (x : ∀ n, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n } := by
apply isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro u ⟨x, n, rfl⟩
apply isOpen_cylinder
· intro x u hx u_open
obtain ⟨v, ⟨U, F, -, rfl⟩, xU, Uu⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { S : Set (∀ i : ℕ, E i) | ∃ (U : ∀ i : ℕ, Set (E i)) (F : Finset ℕ),
(∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → U i ∈ { s : Set (E i) | IsOpen s }) ∧ S = (F : Set ℕ).pi U },
x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
(isTopologicalBasis_pi fun n : ℕ => isTopologicalBasis_opens).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx
u_open
rcases Finset.bddAbove F with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine ⟨cylinder x (n + 1), ⟨x, n + 1, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder _ _, Subset.trans ?_ Uu⟩
intro y hy
suffices ∀ i : ℕ, i ∈ F → y i ∈ U i by simpa
intro i hi
have : y i = x i := mem_cylinder_iff.1 hy i ((hn hi).trans_lt (lt_add_one n))
rw [this]
simp only [Set.mem_pi, Finset.mem_coe] at xU
exact xU i hi
#align pi_nat.is_topological_basis_cylinders PiNat.isTopologicalBasis_cylinders
variable {E}
theorem isOpen_iff_dist (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs x hx
obtain ⟨v, ⟨y, n, rfl⟩, h'x, h's⟩ :
∃ v ∈ { s | ∃ (x : ∀ n : ℕ, E n) (n : ℕ), s = cylinder x n }, x ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ s :=
(isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).exists_subset_of_mem_open hx hs
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_eq.1 h'x] at h's
exact
⟨(1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n, by simp, fun y hy => h's fun i hi => (apply_eq_of_dist_lt hy hi.le).symm⟩
· intro h
refine (isTopologicalBasis_cylinders E).isOpen_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_
rcases h x hx with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos one_half_lt_one
refine ⟨cylinder x n, ⟨x, n, rfl⟩, self_mem_cylinder x n, fun y hy => hε y ?_⟩
rw [PiNat.dist_comm]
exact (mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hy).trans_lt hn
#align pi_nat.is_open_iff_dist PiNat.isOpen_iff_dist
protected def metricSpace : MetricSpace (∀ n, E n) :=
MetricSpace.ofDistTopology dist PiNat.dist_self PiNat.dist_comm PiNat.dist_triangle
isOpen_iff_dist PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero
#align pi_nat.metric_space PiNat.metricSpace
protected def metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity {E : ℕ → Type*} [∀ n, UniformSpace (E n)]
(h : ∀ n, uniformity (E n) = 𝓟 idRel) : MetricSpace (∀ n, E n) :=
haveI : ∀ n, DiscreteTopology (E n) := fun n => discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity (h n)
{ dist_triangle := PiNat.dist_triangle
dist_comm := PiNat.dist_comm
dist_self := PiNat.dist_self
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := PiNat.eq_of_dist_eq_zero _ _
edist_dist := fun _ _ ↦ by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace := Pi.uniformSpace _
uniformity_dist := by
simp [Pi.uniformity, comap_iInf, gt_iff_lt, preimage_setOf_eq, comap_principal,
PseudoMetricSpace.uniformity_dist, h, idRel]
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one εpos (by norm_num)
apply
@mem_iInf_of_iInter _ _ _ _ _ (Finset.range n).finite_toSet fun i =>
{ p : (∀ n : ℕ, E n) × ∀ n : ℕ, E n | p.fst i = p.snd i }
· simp only [mem_principal, setOf_subset_setOf, imp_self, imp_true_iff]
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hxy
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_range, iInter_coe_set, mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq]
at hxy
apply lt_of_le_of_lt _ hn
rw [← mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le, mem_cylinder_iff]
exact hxy
· simp only [le_iInf_iff, le_principal_iff]
intro n
refine mem_iInf_of_mem ((1 / 2) ^ n : ℝ) ?_
refine mem_iInf_of_mem (by positivity) ?_
simp only [mem_principal, setOf_subset_setOf, Prod.forall]
intro x y hxy
exact apply_eq_of_dist_lt hxy le_rfl }
#align pi_nat.metric_space_of_discrete_uniformity PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity
def metricSpaceNatNat : MetricSpace (ℕ → ℕ) :=
PiNat.metricSpaceOfDiscreteUniformity fun _ => rfl
#align pi_nat.metric_space_nat_nat PiNat.metricSpaceNatNat
attribute [local instance] PiNat.metricSpace
protected theorem completeSpace : CompleteSpace (∀ n, E n) := by
refine Metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences (fun n => (1 / 2) ^ n) (by simp) ?_
intro u hu
refine ⟨fun n => u n n, tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun i => ?_⟩
refine tendsto_const_nhds.congr' ?_
filter_upwards [Filter.Ici_mem_atTop i] with n hn
exact apply_eq_of_dist_lt (hu i i n le_rfl hn) le_rfl
#align pi_nat.complete_space PiNat.completeSpace
theorem exists_disjoint_cylinder {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) : ∃ n, Disjoint s (cylinder x n) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
have A : 0 < infDist x s := (hs.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos hne).1 hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ n < infDist x s := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one A one_half_lt_one
refine ⟨n, disjoint_left.2 fun y ys hy => ?_⟩
apply lt_irrefl (infDist x s)
calc
infDist x s ≤ dist x y := infDist_le_dist_of_mem ys
_ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n := by
rw [mem_cylinder_comm] at hy
exact mem_cylinder_iff_dist_le.1 hy
_ < infDist x s := hn
#align pi_nat.exists_disjoint_cylinder PiNat.exists_disjoint_cylinder
def shortestPrefixDiff {E : ℕ → Type*} (x : ∀ n, E n) (s : Set (∀ n, E n)) : ℕ :=
if h : ∃ n, Disjoint s (cylinder x n) then Nat.find h else 0
#align pi_nat.shortest_prefix_diff PiNat.shortestPrefixDiff
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PiNat.lean | 510 | 519 | theorem firstDiff_lt_shortestPrefixDiff {s : Set (∀ n, E n)} (hs : IsClosed s) {x y : ∀ n, E n}
(hx : x ∉ s) (hy : y ∈ s) : firstDiff x y < shortestPrefixDiff x s := by |
have A := exists_disjoint_cylinder hs hx
rw [shortestPrefixDiff, dif_pos A]
have B := Nat.find_spec A
contrapose! B
rw [not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
rw [mem_cylinder_comm]
exact cylinder_anti y B (mem_cylinder_firstDiff x y)
|
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pointwise
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
#align_import algebra.group.unique_prods from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
@[to_additive
"Let `G` be a Type with addition, let `A B : Finset G` be finite subsets and
let `a0 b0 : G` be two elements. `UniqueAdd A B a0 b0` asserts `a0 + b0` can be written in at
most one way as a sum of an element from `A` and an element from `B`."]
def UniqueMul {G} [Mul G] (A B : Finset G) (a0 b0 : G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, a ∈ A → b ∈ B → a * b = a0 * b0 → a = a0 ∧ b = b0
#align unique_mul UniqueMul
#align unique_add UniqueAdd
namespace UniqueMul
variable {G H : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] {A B : Finset G} {a0 b0 : G}
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality, simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/UniqueProds.lean | 67 | 68 | theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton G] : UniqueMul A B a0 b0 := by |
simp [UniqueMul, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 546 | 549 | theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by |
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Arg
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic.eval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5bfbcca0a7ffdd21cf1682e59106d6c942434a32"
namespace Polynomial
open Finset Nat
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_cyclotomic_prime {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} [hn : Fact p.Prime] :
eval 1 (cyclotomic p R) = p := by
simp only [cyclotomic_prime, eval_X, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, eval_pow, eval_finset_sum,
Finset.card_range, smul_one_eq_cast]
#align polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime Polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) {p : ℕ}
[Fact p.Prime] : eval₂ f 1 (cyclotomic p R) = p := by simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime Polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} (k : ℕ)
[hn : Fact p.Prime] : eval 1 (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) R) = p := by
simp only [cyclotomic_prime_pow_eq_geom_sum hn.out, eval_X, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, eval_pow,
eval_finset_sum, Finset.card_range, smul_one_eq_cast]
#align polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow Polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S)
{p : ℕ} (k : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] : eval₂ f 1 (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) R) = p := by simp
#align polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow Polynomial.eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow
private theorem cyclotomic_neg_one_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) {R} [LinearOrderedCommRing R] :
0 < eval (-1 : R) (cyclotomic n R) := by
haveI := NeZero.of_gt hn
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg, eval_intCast_map, Int.coe_castRingHom,
Int.cast_pos]
suffices 0 < eval (↑(-1 : ℤ)) (cyclotomic n ℝ) by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int n ℝ, eval_intCast_map, Int.coe_castRingHom] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_pos] using this
simp only [Int.cast_one, Int.cast_neg]
have h0 := cyclotomic_coeff_zero ℝ hn.le
rw [coeff_zero_eq_eval_zero] at h0
by_contra! hx
have := intermediate_value_univ (-1) 0 (cyclotomic n ℝ).continuous
obtain ⟨y, hy : IsRoot _ y⟩ := this (show (0 : ℝ) ∈ Set.Icc _ _ by simpa [h0] using hx)
rw [@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff] at hy
rw [hy.eq_orderOf] at hn
exact hn.not_le LinearOrderedRing.orderOf_le_two
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Eval.lean | 70 | 111 | theorem cyclotomic_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) {R} [LinearOrderedCommRing R] (x : R) :
0 < eval x (cyclotomic n R) := by |
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n ih
have hn' : 0 < n := pos_of_gt hn
have hn'' : 1 < n := one_lt_two.trans hn
have := prod_cyclotomic_eq_geom_sum hn' R
apply_fun eval x at this
rw [← cons_self_properDivisors hn'.ne', Finset.erase_cons_of_ne _ hn''.ne', Finset.prod_cons,
eval_mul, eval_geom_sum] at this
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, x ^ i) with (h | h | h)
· apply pos_of_mul_pos_left
· rwa [this]
rw [eval_prod]
refine Finset.prod_nonneg fun i hi => ?_
simp only [Finset.mem_erase, mem_properDivisors] at hi
rw [geom_sum_pos_iff hn'.ne'] at h
cases' h with hk hx
· refine (ih _ hi.2.2 (Nat.two_lt_of_ne ?_ hi.1 ?_)).le <;> rintro rfl
· exact hn'.ne' (zero_dvd_iff.mp hi.2.1)
· exact even_iff_not_odd.mp (even_iff_two_dvd.mpr hi.2.1) hk
· rcases eq_or_ne i 2 with (rfl | hk)
· simpa only [eval_X, eval_one, cyclotomic_two, eval_add] using hx.le
refine (ih _ hi.2.2 (Nat.two_lt_of_ne ?_ hi.1 hk)).le
rintro rfl
exact hn'.ne' <| zero_dvd_iff.mp hi.2.1
· rw [eq_comm, geom_sum_eq_zero_iff_neg_one hn'.ne'] at h
exact h.1.symm ▸ cyclotomic_neg_one_pos hn
· apply pos_of_mul_neg_left
· rwa [this]
rw [geom_sum_neg_iff hn'.ne'] at h
have h2 : 2 ∈ n.properDivisors.erase 1 := by
rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_properDivisors]
exact ⟨by decide, even_iff_two_dvd.mp h.1, hn⟩
rw [eval_prod, ← Finset.prod_erase_mul _ _ h2]
apply mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos
· refine Finset.prod_nonneg fun i hi => le_of_lt ?_
simp only [Finset.mem_erase, mem_properDivisors] at hi
refine ih _ hi.2.2.2 (Nat.two_lt_of_ne ?_ hi.2.1 hi.1)
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hi
exact hn'.ne' hi.2.2.1
· simpa only [eval_X, eval_one, cyclotomic_two, eval_add] using h.right.le
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
#align_import geometry.manifold.mfderiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle
section DerivativesProperties
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₀ f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at_univ uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
#align unique_mdiff_within_at_iff uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.mono UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.inter' UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter'
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.inter UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
#align is_open.unique_mdiff_within_at IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
#align unique_mdiff_on.inter UniqueMDiffOn.inter
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
#align is_open.unique_mdiff_on IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
#align unique_mdiff_on_univ uniqueMDiffOn_univ
variable [Is : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] [I's : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M']
[I''s : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I'' M'']
{f' f₀' f₁' : TangentSpace I x →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I' (f x)}
{g' : TangentSpace I' (f x) →L[𝕜] TangentSpace I'' (g (f x))}
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' := by
-- Porting note: didn't need `convert` because of finding instances by unification
convert U.eq h.2 h₁.2
#align unique_mdiff_within_at.eq UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.eq (U : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (hx : x ∈ s) (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(h₁ : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁') : f' = f₁' :=
UniqueMDiffWithinAt.eq (U _ hx) h h₁
#align unique_mdiff_on.eq UniqueMDiffOn.eq
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_iff mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x' ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ Set.range I) ((extChartAt I x) x') :=
(differentiable_within_at_localInvariantProp I I').liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart
(StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x) hx (StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ y)
hy
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_iff_of_mem_source mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source
theorem mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = 0 := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
#align mfderiv_within_zero_of_not_mdifferentiable_within_at mfderivWithin_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt (h : ¬MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x = 0 := by simp only [mfderiv, h, if_neg, not_false_iff]
#align mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiable_at mfderiv_zero_of_not_mdifferentiableAt
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') (hst : s ⊆ t) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst,
HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 (inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono hst) (Subset.refl _))⟩
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.mono HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono
theorem HasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' :=
⟨ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt h.1, HasFDerivWithinAt.mono h.2 inter_subset_right⟩
#align has_mfderiv_at.has_mfderiv_within_at HasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.mdifferentiable_within_at HasMFDerivWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem HasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
rw [mdifferentiableAt_iff]
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨f', h.2⟩⟩
#align has_mfderiv_at.mdifferentiable_at HasMFDerivAt.mdifferentiableAt
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f univ x f' ↔ HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
simp only [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivAt, continuousWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]
#align has_mfderiv_within_at_univ hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem hasMFDerivAt_unique (h₀ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₀') (h₁ : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₁') :
f₀' = f₁' := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h₀ h₁
exact (uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).eq h₀ h₁
#align has_mfderiv_at_unique hasMFDerivAt_unique
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq,
hasFDerivWithinAt_inter', continuousWithinAt_inter' h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin I h
#align has_mfderiv_within_at_inter' hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter'
theorem hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x f' ↔ HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := by
rw [HasMFDerivWithinAt, HasMFDerivWithinAt, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq, hasFDerivWithinAt_inter,
continuousWithinAt_inter h]
exact extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds I h
#align has_mfderiv_within_at_inter hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.union (hs : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(ht : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f') : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f (s ∪ t) x f' := by
constructor
· exact ContinuousWithinAt.union hs.1 ht.1
· convert HasFDerivWithinAt.union hs.2 ht.2 using 1
simp only [union_inter_distrib_right, preimage_union]
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.union HasMFDerivWithinAt.union
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (ht : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f t x f' :=
(hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter' ht).1 (h.mono inter_subset_right)
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.nhds_within HasMFDerivWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f' := by
rwa [← univ_inter s, hasMFDerivWithinAt_inter hs, hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.has_mfderiv_at HasMFDerivWithinAt.hasMFDerivAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x (mfderivWithin I I' f s x) := by
refine ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.2
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.has_mfderiv_within_at MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
protected theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f : _) ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
simp only [mfderivWithin, h, if_pos]
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.mfderiv_within MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin
theorem MDifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x (mfderiv I I' f x) := by
refine ⟨h.continuousAt, ?_⟩
simp only [mfderiv, h, if_pos, mfld_simps]
exact DifferentiableWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
#align mdifferentiable_at.has_mfderiv_at MDifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt
protected theorem MDifferentiableAt.mfderiv (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderiv I I' f x =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f : _) (range I) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
simp only [mfderiv, h, if_pos]
#align mdifferentiable_at.mfderiv MDifferentiableAt.mfderiv
protected theorem HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') : mfderiv I I' f x = f' :=
(hasMFDerivAt_unique h h.mdifferentiableAt.hasMFDerivAt).symm
#align has_mfderiv_at.mfderiv HasMFDerivAt.mfderiv
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = f' := by
ext
rw [hxs.eq h h.mdifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt]
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.mfderiv_within HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin
theorem MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hxs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x := by
apply HasMFDerivWithinAt.mfderivWithin _ hxs
exact h.hasMFDerivAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable.mfderiv_within MDifferentiable.mfderivWithin
theorem mfderivWithin_subset (st : s ⊆ t) (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderivWithin I I' f t x :=
((MDifferentiableWithinAt.hasMFDerivWithinAt h).mono st).mfderivWithin hs
#align mfderiv_within_subset mfderivWithin_subset
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.mono MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_univ mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
(differentiable_within_at_localInvariantProp I I').liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_inter mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
(differentiable_within_at_localInvariantProp I I').liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
#align mdifferentiable_within_at_inter' mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
#align mdifferentiable_at.mdifferentiable_within_at MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.mdifferentiable_at MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
#align mdifferentiable_on.mono MDifferentiableOn.mono
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
#align mdifferentiable_on_univ mdifferentiableOn_univ
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
#align mdifferentiable.mdifferentiable_on MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
#align mdifferentiable_on_of_locally_mdifferentiable_on mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mfderivWithin_univ : mfderivWithin I I' f univ = mfderiv I I' f := by
ext x : 1
simp only [mfderivWithin, mfderiv, mfld_simps]
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ]
#align mfderiv_within_univ mfderivWithin_univ
theorem mfderivWithin_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f (s ∩ t) x = mfderivWithin I I' f s x := by
rw [mfderivWithin, mfderivWithin, extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter ht,
fderivWithin_inter (extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhds I ht)]
#align mfderiv_within_inter mfderivWithin_inter
theorem mfderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x := by
rw [← mfderivWithin_univ, ← univ_inter s, mfderivWithin_inter h]
lemma mfderivWithin_of_isOpen (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x :=
mfderivWithin_of_mem_nhds (hs.mem_nhds hx)
theorem mfderivWithin_eq_mfderiv (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
mfderivWithin I I' f s x = mfderiv I I' f x := by
rw [← mfderivWithin_univ]
exact mfderivWithin_subset (subset_univ _) hs h.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source {x' : M} {y : M'}
(hx : x' ∈ (chartAt H x).source) (hy : f x' ∈ (chartAt H' y).source) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x' ↔
ContinuousAt f x' ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' y ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (Set.range I)
((extChartAt I x) x') :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.symm.trans <|
(mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_of_mem_source hx hy).trans <| by
rw [continuousWithinAt_univ, Set.preimage_univ, Set.univ_inter]
#align mdifferentiable_at_iff_of_mem_source mdifferentiableAt_iff_of_mem_source
-- Porting note: moved from `ContMDiffMFDeriv`
variable {n : ℕ∞}
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
suffices h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) x by
rwa [mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter'] at h
apply hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
exact extChartAt_source_mem_nhds I' (f x)
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff]
exact ⟨hf.1.mono inter_subset_left, (hf.2.differentiableWithinAt hn).mono (by mfld_set_tac)⟩
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.mdifferentiable_within_at ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : ContMDiffAt I I' n f x) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.1 <| ContMDiffWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt hf hn
#align cont_mdiff_at.mdifferentiable_at ContMDiffAt.mdifferentiableAt
theorem ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : ContMDiffOn I I' n f s) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt hn
#align cont_mdiff_on.mdifferentiable_on ContMDiffOn.mdifferentiableOn
theorem ContMDiff.mdifferentiable (hf : ContMDiff I I' n f) (hn : 1 ≤ n) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
fun x => (hf x).mdifferentiableAt hn
#align cont_mdiff.mdifferentiable ContMDiff.mdifferentiable
nonrec theorem SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : SmoothWithinAt I I' f s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
hf.mdifferentiableWithinAt le_top
#align smooth_within_at.mdifferentiable_within_at SmoothWithinAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
nonrec theorem SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt (hf : SmoothAt I I' f x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.mdifferentiableAt le_top
#align smooth_at.mdifferentiable_at SmoothAt.mdifferentiableAt
nonrec theorem SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn (hf : SmoothOn I I' f s) : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
hf.mdifferentiableOn le_top
#align smooth_on.mdifferentiable_on SmoothOn.mdifferentiableOn
theorem Smooth.mdifferentiable (hf : Smooth I I' f) : MDifferentiable I I' f :=
ContMDiff.mdifferentiable hf le_top
#align smooth.mdifferentiable Smooth.mdifferentiable
theorem Smooth.mdifferentiableAt (hf : Smooth I I' f) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf.mdifferentiable x
#align smooth.mdifferentiable_at Smooth.mdifferentiableAt
theorem Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt (hf : Smooth I I' f) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
hf.mdifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align smooth.mdifferentiable_within_at Smooth.mdifferentiableWithinAt
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.continuousWithinAt (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.1
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.continuous_within_at HasMFDerivWithinAt.continuousWithinAt
theorem HasMFDerivAt.continuousAt (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') : ContinuousAt f x :=
h.1
#align has_mfderiv_at.continuous_at HasMFDerivAt.continuousAt
theorem MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) : ContinuousOn f s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).continuousWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_on.continuous_on MDifferentiableOn.continuousOn
theorem MDifferentiable.continuous (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x => (h x).continuousAt
#align mdifferentiable.continuous MDifferentiable.continuous
theorem tangentMapWithin_subset {p : TangentBundle I M} (st : s ⊆ t)
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s p.1) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t p.1) :
tangentMapWithin I I' f s p = tangentMapWithin I I' f t p := by
simp only [tangentMapWithin, mfld_simps]
rw [mfderivWithin_subset st hs h]
#align tangent_map_within_subset tangentMapWithin_subset
theorem tangentMapWithin_univ : tangentMapWithin I I' f univ = tangentMap I I' f := by
ext p : 1
simp only [tangentMapWithin, tangentMap, mfld_simps]
#align tangent_map_within_univ tangentMapWithin_univ
theorem tangentMapWithin_eq_tangentMap {p : TangentBundle I M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s p.1)
(h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f p.1) : tangentMapWithin I I' f s p = tangentMap I I' f p := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
rw [← tangentMapWithin_univ]
exact tangentMapWithin_subset (subset_univ _) hs h
#align tangent_map_within_eq_tangent_map tangentMapWithin_eq_tangentMap
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMapWithin_proj {p : TangentBundle I M} :
(tangentMapWithin I I' f s p).proj = f p.proj :=
rfl
#align tangent_map_within_proj tangentMapWithin_proj
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem tangentMap_proj {p : TangentBundle I M} : (tangentMap I I' f p).proj = f p.proj :=
rfl
#align tangent_map_proj tangentMap_proj
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prod hg.1, hf.2.prod hg.2⟩
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.prod_mk MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hg : MDifferentiableAt I I'' g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prod hg.1, hf.2.prod hg.2⟩
#align mdifferentiable_at.prod_mk MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s)
(hg : MDifferentiableOn I I'' g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I (I'.prod I'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prod_mk (hg x hx)
#align mdifferentiable_on.prod_mk MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk
theorem MDifferentiable.prod_mk {f : M → M'} {g : M → M''} (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I I'' g) : MDifferentiable I (I'.prod I'') fun x => (f x, g x) := fun x =>
(hf x).prod_mk (hg x)
#align mdifferentiable.prod_mk MDifferentiable.prod_mk
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s x)
(hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s x :=
⟨hf.1.prod hg.1, hf.2.prod hg.2⟩
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.prod_mk_space MDifferentiableWithinAt.prod_mk_space
theorem MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f x) (hg : MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g x) :
MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) x :=
⟨hf.1.prod hg.1, hf.2.prod hg.2⟩
#align mdifferentiable_at.prod_mk_space MDifferentiableAt.prod_mk_space
theorem MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''}
(hf : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f s) (hg : MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g s) :
MDifferentiableOn I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') (fun x => (f x, g x)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).prod_mk_space (hg x hx)
#align mdifferentiable_on.prod_mk_space MDifferentiableOn.prod_mk_space
theorem MDifferentiable.prod_mk_space {f : M → E'} {g : M → E''} (hf : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E') f)
(hg : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E'') g) : MDifferentiable I 𝓘(𝕜, E' × E'') fun x => (f x, g x) :=
fun x => (hf x).prod_mk_space (hg x)
#align mdifferentiable.prod_mk_space MDifferentiable.prod_mk_space
theorem HasMFDerivAt.congr_mfderiv (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') (h' : f' = f₁') :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f₁' :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_mfderiv (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (h' : f' = f₁') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f₁' :=
h' ▸ h
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f₁ s x f' := by
refine ⟨ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h.1 h₁ hx, ?_⟩
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h.2
· have :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' {y | f₁ y = f y} ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin I h₁
apply Filter.mem_of_superset this fun y => _
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [hx, mfld_simps]
· simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono (h : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f')
(ht : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f₁ t x f' :=
(h.mono h₁).congr_of_eventuallyEq (Filter.mem_inf_of_right ht) hx
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.congr_mono HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono
theorem HasMFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
HasMFDerivAt I I' f₁ x f' := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at h ⊢
apply h.congr_of_eventuallyEq _ (mem_of_mem_nhds h₁ : _)
rwa [nhdsWithin_univ]
#align has_mfderiv_at.congr_of_eventually_eq HasMFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f₁ s x :=
(h.hasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx).mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.congr_of_eventually_eq MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
variable (I I')
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff (h₁ : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f₁ s x := by
constructor
· intro h
apply h.congr_of_eventuallyEq h₁ hx
· intro h
apply h.congr_of_eventuallyEq _ hx.symm
apply h₁.mono
intro y
apply Eq.symm
#align filter.eventually_eq.mdifferentiable_within_at_iff Filter.EventuallyEq.mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff
variable {I I'}
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(ht : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f₁ t x :=
(HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasMFDerivWithinAt ht hx h₁).mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.congr_mono MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr_mono
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(ht : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f₁ s x :=
(HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasMFDerivWithinAt ht hx (Subset.refl _)).mdifferentiableWithinAt
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.congr MDifferentiableWithinAt.congr
theorem MDifferentiableOn.congr_mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (h' : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x)
(h₁ : t ⊆ s) : MDifferentiableOn I I' f₁ t := fun x hx =>
(h x (h₁ hx)).congr_mono h' (h' x hx) h₁
#align mdifferentiable_on.congr_mono MDifferentiableOn.congr_mono
theorem MDifferentiableAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x)
(hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f₁ x :=
(h.hasMFDerivAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hL).mdifferentiableAt
#align mdifferentiable_at.congr_of_eventually_eq MDifferentiableAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin_congr_mono (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ t, f₁ x = f x) (hx : f₁ x = f x) (hxt : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x) (h₁ : t ⊆ s) :
mfderivWithin I I' f₁ t x = (mfderivWithin I I' f s x : _) :=
(HasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_mono h.hasMFDerivWithinAt hs hx h₁).mfderivWithin hxt
#align mdifferentiable_within_at.mfderiv_within_congr_mono MDifferentiableWithinAt.mfderivWithin_congr_mono
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.mfderivWithin_eq (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] f)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : mfderivWithin I I' f₁ s x = (mfderivWithin I I' f s x : _) := by
by_cases h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x
· exact (h.hasMFDerivWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq hL hx).mfderivWithin hs
· unfold mfderivWithin
rw [if_neg h, if_neg]
rwa [← hL.mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff I I' hx]
#align filter.eventually_eq.mfderiv_within_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.mfderivWithin_eq
theorem mfderivWithin_congr (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (hL : ∀ x ∈ s, f₁ x = f x)
(hx : f₁ x = f x) : mfderivWithin I I' f₁ s x = (mfderivWithin I I' f s x : _) :=
Filter.EventuallyEq.mfderivWithin_eq hs (Filter.eventuallyEq_of_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin hL) hx
#align mfderiv_within_congr mfderivWithin_congr
theorem tangentMapWithin_congr (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = f₁ x) (p : TangentBundle I M) (hp : p.1 ∈ s)
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s p.1) :
tangentMapWithin I I' f s p = tangentMapWithin I I' f₁ s p := by
refine TotalSpace.ext _ _ (h p.1 hp) ?_
-- This used to be `simp only`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [tangentMapWithin, h p.1 hp, tangentMapWithin, mfderivWithin_congr hs h (h _ hp)]
#align tangent_map_within_congr tangentMapWithin_congr
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.mfderiv_eq (hL : f₁ =ᶠ[𝓝 x] f) :
mfderiv I I' f₁ x = (mfderiv I I' f x : _) := by
have A : f₁ x = f x := (mem_of_mem_nhds hL : _)
rw [← mfderivWithin_univ, ← mfderivWithin_univ]
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at hL
exact hL.mfderivWithin_eq (uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I) A
#align filter.eventually_eq.mfderiv_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.mfderiv_eq
theorem mfderiv_congr_point {x' : M} (h : x = x') :
@Eq (E →L[𝕜] E') (mfderiv I I' f x) (mfderiv I I' f x') := by subst h; rfl
#align mfderiv_congr_point mfderiv_congr_point
theorem mfderiv_congr {f' : M → M'} (h : f = f') :
@Eq (E →L[𝕜] E') (mfderiv I I' f x) (mfderiv I I' f' x) := by subst h; rfl
#align mfderiv_congr mfderiv_congr
theorem writtenInExtChartAt_comp (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
{y | writtenInExtChartAt I I'' x (g ∘ f) y =
(writtenInExtChartAt I' I'' (f x) g ∘ writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f) y} ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x := by
apply
@Filter.mem_of_superset _ _ (f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) _
(extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin I
(h.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _ _)))
mfld_set_tac
#align written_in_ext_chart_comp writtenInExtChartAt_comp
variable (x)
theorem HasMFDerivWithinAt.comp (hg : HasMFDerivWithinAt I' I'' g u (f x) g')
(hf : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') (hst : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' u) :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I'' (g ∘ f) s x (g'.comp f') := by
refine ⟨ContinuousWithinAt.comp hg.1 hf.1 hst, ?_⟩
have A :
HasFDerivWithinAt (writtenInExtChartAt I' I'' (f x) g ∘ writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
(ContinuousLinearMap.comp g' f' : E →L[𝕜] E'') ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
have :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source) ∈
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin I
(hf.1.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds _ _))
unfold HasMFDerivWithinAt at *
rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_inter' this, ← extChartAt_preimage_inter_eq] at hf ⊢
have : writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f ((extChartAt I x) x) = (extChartAt I' (f x)) (f x) := by
simp only [mfld_simps]
rw [← this] at hg
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.comp ((extChartAt I x) x) hg.2 hf.2 _
intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
have : f (((chartAt H x).symm : H → M) (I.symm y)) ∈ u := hst hy.1.1
simp only [hy, this, mfld_simps]
apply A.congr_of_eventuallyEq (writtenInExtChartAt_comp hf.1)
simp only [mfld_simps]
#align has_mfderiv_within_at.comp HasMFDerivWithinAt.comp
theorem HasMFDerivAt.comp (hg : HasMFDerivAt I' I'' g (f x) g') (hf : HasMFDerivAt I I' f x f') :
HasMFDerivAt I I'' (g ∘ f) x (g'.comp f') := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact HasMFDerivWithinAt.comp x (hg.mono (subset_univ _)) hf subset_preimage_univ
#align has_mfderiv_at.comp HasMFDerivAt.comp
theorem HasMFDerivAt.comp_hasMFDerivWithinAt (hg : HasMFDerivAt I' I'' g (f x) g')
(hf : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f') :
HasMFDerivWithinAt I I'' (g ∘ f) s x (g'.comp f') := by
rw [← hasMFDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact HasMFDerivWithinAt.comp x (hg.mono (subset_univ _)) hf subset_preimage_univ
#align has_mfderiv_at.comp_has_mfderiv_within_at HasMFDerivAt.comp_hasMFDerivWithinAt
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 711 | 718 | theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.comp (hg : MDifferentiableWithinAt I' I'' g u (f x))
(hf : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x) (h : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' u) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I'' (g ∘ f) s x := by |
rcases hf.2 with ⟨f', hf'⟩
have F : HasMFDerivWithinAt I I' f s x f' := ⟨hf.1, hf'⟩
rcases hg.2 with ⟨g', hg'⟩
have G : HasMFDerivWithinAt I' I'' g u (f x) g' := ⟨hg.1, hg'⟩
exact (HasMFDerivWithinAt.comp x G F h).mdifferentiableWithinAt
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
set_option autoImplicit true
open Set
open scoped ENNReal Classical
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
def count : Measure α :=
sum dirac
#align measure_theory.measure.count MeasureTheory.Measure.count
theorem le_count_apply : ∑' _ : s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ count s :=
calc
(∑' _ : s, 1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑' i, indicator s 1 i := tsum_subtype s 1
_ ≤ ∑' i, dirac i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => le_dirac_apply
_ ≤ count s := le_sum_apply _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_count_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_count_apply
theorem count_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : count s = ∑' i : s, 1 := by
simp only [count, sum_apply, hs, dirac_apply', ← tsum_subtype s (1 : α → ℝ≥0∞), Pi.one_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem count_empty : count (∅ : Set α) = 0 := by rw [count_apply MeasurableSet.empty, tsum_empty]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.count_empty
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset' {s : Finset α} (s_mble : MeasurableSet (s : Set α)) :
count (↑s : Set α) = s.card :=
calc
count (↑s : Set α) = ∑' i : (↑s : Set α), 1 := count_apply s_mble
_ = ∑ i ∈ s, 1 := s.tsum_subtype 1
_ = s.card := by simp
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finset' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finset'
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Finset α) :
count (↑s : Set α) = s.card :=
count_apply_finset' s.measurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finset MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finset
theorem count_apply_finite' {s : Set α} (s_fin : s.Finite) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
count s = s_fin.toFinset.card := by
simp [←
@count_apply_finset' _ _ s_fin.toFinset (by simpa only [Finite.coe_toFinset] using s_mble)]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finite' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finite'
theorem count_apply_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite) :
count s = hs.toFinset.card := by rw [← count_apply_finset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_finite MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_finite
theorem count_apply_infinite (hs : s.Infinite) : count s = ∞ := by
refine top_unique (le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n => ?_)
rcases hs.exists_subset_card_eq n with ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
calc
(t.card : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ t, 1 := by simp
_ = ∑' i : (t : Set α), 1 := (t.tsum_subtype 1).symm
_ ≤ count (t : Set α) := le_count_apply
_ ≤ count s := measure_mono ht
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_infinite MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_infinite
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_eq_top' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s = ∞ ↔ s.Infinite := by
by_cases hs : s.Finite
· simp [Set.Infinite, hs, count_apply_finite' hs s_mble]
· change s.Infinite at hs
simp [hs, count_apply_infinite]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_eq_top' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_eq_top'
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_eq_top [MeasurableSingletonClass α] : count s = ∞ ↔ s.Infinite := by
by_cases hs : s.Finite
· exact count_apply_eq_top' hs.measurableSet
· change s.Infinite at hs
simp [hs, count_apply_infinite]
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_eq_top MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_lt_top' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s < ∞ ↔ s.Finite :=
calc
count s < ∞ ↔ count s ≠ ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
_ ↔ ¬s.Infinite := not_congr (count_apply_eq_top' s_mble)
_ ↔ s.Finite := Classical.not_not
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_lt_top' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_lt_top'
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_lt_top [MeasurableSingletonClass α] : count s < ∞ ↔ s.Finite :=
calc
count s < ∞ ↔ count s ≠ ∞ := lt_top_iff_ne_top
_ ↔ ¬s.Infinite := not_congr count_apply_eq_top
_ ↔ s.Finite := Classical.not_not
#align measure_theory.measure.count_apply_lt_top MeasureTheory.Measure.count_apply_lt_top
theorem empty_of_count_eq_zero' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) (hsc : count s = 0) : s = ∅ := by
have hs : s.Finite := by
rw [← count_apply_lt_top' s_mble, hsc]
exact WithTop.zero_lt_top
simpa [count_apply_finite' hs s_mble] using hsc
#align measure_theory.measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero'
theorem empty_of_count_eq_zero [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (hsc : count s = 0) : s = ∅ := by
have hs : s.Finite := by
rw [← count_apply_lt_top, hsc]
exact WithTop.zero_lt_top
simpa [count_apply_finite _ hs] using hsc
#align measure_theory.measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.empty_of_count_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_zero_iff' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨empty_of_count_eq_zero' s_mble, fun h => h.symm ▸ count_empty⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.count_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_zero_iff [MeasurableSingletonClass α] : count s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨empty_of_count_eq_zero, fun h => h.symm ▸ count_empty⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.count_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.count_eq_zero_iff
theorem count_ne_zero' (hs' : s.Nonempty) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, count_eq_zero_iff' s_mble]
exact hs'.ne_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.count_ne_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.count_ne_zero'
theorem count_ne_zero [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (hs' : s.Nonempty) : count s ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, count_eq_zero_iff]
exact hs'.ne_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.count_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.count_ne_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Count.lean | 150 | 153 | theorem count_singleton' {a : α} (ha : MeasurableSet ({a} : Set α)) : count ({a} : Set α) = 1 := by |
rw [count_apply_finite' (Set.finite_singleton a) ha, Set.Finite.toFinset]
simp [@toFinset_card _ _ (Set.finite_singleton a).fintype,
@Fintype.card_unique _ _ (Set.finite_singleton a).fintype]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.EpiMono
#align_import category_theory.adjunction.evaluation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"937c692d73f5130c7fecd3fd32e81419f4e04eb7"
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} D]
noncomputable section
section
variable [∀ a b : C, HasCoproductsOfShape (a ⟶ b) D]
@[simps]
def evaluationLeftAdjoint (c : C) : D ⥤ C ⥤ D where
obj d :=
{ obj := fun t => ∐ fun _ : c ⟶ t => d
map := fun f => Sigma.desc fun g => (Sigma.ι fun _ => d) <| g ≫ f}
map {_ d₂} f :=
{ app := fun e => Sigma.desc fun h => f ≫ Sigma.ι (fun _ => d₂) h
naturality := by
intros
dsimp
ext
simp }
#align category_theory.evaluation_left_adjoint CategoryTheory.evaluationLeftAdjoint
@[simps! unit_app counit_app_app]
def evaluationAdjunctionRight (c : C) : evaluationLeftAdjoint D c ⊣ (evaluation _ _).obj c :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun d F =>
{ toFun := fun f => Sigma.ι (fun _ => d) (𝟙 _) ≫ f.app c
invFun := fun f =>
{ app := fun e => Sigma.desc fun h => f ≫ F.map h
naturality := by
intros
dsimp
ext
simp }
left_inv := by
intro f
ext x
dsimp
ext g
simp only [colimit.ι_desc, Cofan.mk_ι_app, Category.assoc, ← f.naturality,
evaluationLeftAdjoint_obj_map, colimit.ι_desc_assoc,
Discrete.functor_obj, Cofan.mk_pt, Discrete.natTrans_app, Category.id_comp]
right_inv := fun f => by
dsimp
simp }
-- This used to be automatic before leanprover/lean4#2644
homEquiv_naturality_right := by intros; dsimp; simp }
#align category_theory.evaluation_adjunction_right CategoryTheory.evaluationAdjunctionRight
instance evaluationIsRightAdjoint (c : C) : ((evaluation _ D).obj c).IsRightAdjoint :=
⟨_, ⟨evaluationAdjunctionRight _ _⟩⟩
#align category_theory.evaluation_is_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.evaluationIsRightAdjoint
theorem NatTrans.mono_iff_mono_app {F G : C ⥤ D} (η : F ⟶ G) : Mono η ↔ ∀ c, Mono (η.app c) := by
constructor
· intro h c
exact (inferInstance : Mono (((evaluation _ _).obj c).map η))
· intro _
apply NatTrans.mono_of_mono_app
#align category_theory.nat_trans.mono_iff_mono_app CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mono_iff_mono_app
end
section
variable [∀ a b : C, HasProductsOfShape (a ⟶ b) D]
@[simps]
def evaluationRightAdjoint (c : C) : D ⥤ C ⥤ D where
obj d :=
{ obj := fun t => ∏ᶜ fun _ : t ⟶ c => d
map := fun f => Pi.lift fun g => Pi.π _ <| f ≫ g }
map f :=
{ app := fun t => Pi.lift fun g => Pi.π _ g ≫ f
naturality := by
intros
dsimp
ext
simp }
#align category_theory.evaluation_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.evaluationRightAdjoint
@[simps! unit_app_app counit_app]
def evaluationAdjunctionLeft (c : C) : (evaluation _ _).obj c ⊣ evaluationRightAdjoint D c :=
Adjunction.mkOfHomEquiv
{ homEquiv := fun F d =>
{ toFun := fun f =>
{ app := fun t => Pi.lift fun g => F.map g ≫ f
naturality := by
intros
dsimp
ext
simp }
invFun := fun f => f.app _ ≫ Pi.π _ (𝟙 _)
left_inv := fun f => by
dsimp
simp
right_inv := by
intro f
ext x
dsimp
ext g
simp only [Discrete.functor_obj, NatTrans.naturality_assoc,
evaluationRightAdjoint_obj_obj, evaluationRightAdjoint_obj_map, limit.lift_π,
Fan.mk_pt, Fan.mk_π_app, Discrete.natTrans_app, Category.comp_id] } }
#align category_theory.evaluation_adjunction_left CategoryTheory.evaluationAdjunctionLeft
instance evaluationIsLeftAdjoint (c : C) : ((evaluation _ D).obj c).IsLeftAdjoint :=
⟨_, ⟨evaluationAdjunctionLeft _ _⟩⟩
#align category_theory.evaluation_is_left_adjoint CategoryTheory.evaluationIsLeftAdjoint
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Evaluation.lean | 140 | 145 | theorem NatTrans.epi_iff_epi_app {F G : C ⥤ D} (η : F ⟶ G) : Epi η ↔ ∀ c, Epi (η.app c) := by |
constructor
· intro h c
exact (inferInstance : Epi (((evaluation _ _).obj c).map η))
· intros
apply NatTrans.epi_of_epi_app
|
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import group_theory.p_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
open Fintype MulAction
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
def IsPGroup : Prop :=
∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, g ^ p ^ k = 1
#align is_p_group IsPGroup
variable {p} {G}
namespace IsPGroup
theorem iff_orderOf [hp : Fact p.Prime] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ k :=
forall_congr' fun g =>
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ =>
Exists.imp (fun _ h => h.right)
((Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)),
Exists.imp fun k hk => by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
#align is_p_group.iff_order_of IsPGroup.iff_orderOf
theorem of_card [Fintype G] {n : ℕ} (hG : card G = p ^ n) : IsPGroup p G := fun g =>
⟨n, by rw [← hG, pow_card_eq_one]⟩
#align is_p_group.of_card IsPGroup.of_card
theorem of_bot : IsPGroup p (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
of_card (by rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Subgroup.card_bot, pow_zero])
#align is_p_group.of_bot IsPGroup.of_bot
theorem iff_card [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype G] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, card G = p ^ n := by
have hG : card G ≠ 0 := card_ne_zero
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => of_card hn⟩
suffices ∀ q ∈ Nat.factors (card G), q = p by
use (card G).factors.length
rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← List.eq_replicate_of_mem this, Nat.prod_factors hG]
intro q hq
obtain ⟨hq1, hq2⟩ := (Nat.mem_factors hG).mp hq
haveI : Fact q.Prime := ⟨hq1⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card q hq2
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (iff_orderOf.mp h) g
exact (hq1.pow_eq_iff.mp (hg.symm.trans hk).symm).1.symm
#align is_p_group.iff_card IsPGroup.iff_card
alias ⟨exists_card_eq, _⟩ := iff_card
section GIsPGroup
variable (hG : IsPGroup p G)
theorem of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : H →* G) (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
simp_rw [IsPGroup, ← hϕ.eq_iff, ϕ.map_pow, ϕ.map_one]
exact fun h => hG (ϕ h)
#align is_p_group.of_injective IsPGroup.of_injective
theorem to_subgroup (H : Subgroup G) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_injective H.subtype Subtype.coe_injective
#align is_p_group.to_subgroup IsPGroup.to_subgroup
theorem of_surjective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G →* H) (hϕ : Function.Surjective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by
refine fun h => Exists.elim (hϕ h) fun g hg => Exists.imp (fun k hk => ?_) (hG g)
rw [← hg, ← ϕ.map_pow, hk, ϕ.map_one]
#align is_p_group.of_surjective IsPGroup.of_surjective
theorem to_quotient (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] : IsPGroup p (G ⧸ H) :=
hG.of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk' H) Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''
#align is_p_group.to_quotient IsPGroup.to_quotient
theorem of_equiv {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : G ≃* H) : IsPGroup p H :=
hG.of_surjective ϕ.toMonoidHom ϕ.surjective
#align is_p_group.of_equiv IsPGroup.of_equiv
theorem orderOf_coprime {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : (orderOf g).Coprime n :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG g
(hn.pow_left k).coprime_dvd_left (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)
#align is_p_group.order_of_coprime IsPGroup.orderOf_coprime
noncomputable def powEquiv {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) : G ≃ G :=
let h : ∀ g : G, (Nat.card (Subgroup.zpowers g)).Coprime n := fun g =>
(Nat.card_zpowers g).symm ▸ hG.orderOf_coprime hn g
{ toFun := (· ^ n)
invFun := fun g => (powCoprime (h g)).symm ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩
left_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <|
(powCoprime (h (g ^ n))).left_inv
⟨g, _, Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).left_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩⟩
right_inv := fun g =>
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| (powCoprime (h g)).right_inv ⟨g, Subgroup.mem_zpowers g⟩ }
#align is_p_group.pow_equiv IsPGroup.powEquiv
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) : hG.powEquiv hn g = g ^ n :=
rfl
#align is_p_group.pow_equiv_apply IsPGroup.powEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem powEquiv_symm_apply {n : ℕ} (hn : p.Coprime n) (g : G) :
(hG.powEquiv hn).symm g = g ^ (orderOf g).gcdB n := by rw [← Nat.card_zpowers]; rfl
#align is_p_group.pow_equiv_symm_apply IsPGroup.powEquiv_symm_apply
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
noncomputable abbrev powEquiv' {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) : G ≃ G :=
powEquiv hG (hp.out.coprime_iff_not_dvd.mpr hn)
#align is_p_group.pow_equiv' IsPGroup.powEquiv'
theorem index (H : Subgroup G) [H.FiniteIndex] : ∃ n : ℕ, H.index = p ^ n := by
haveI := H.normalCore.fintypeQuotientOfFiniteIndex
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp (hG.to_quotient H.normalCore)
obtain ⟨k, _, hk2⟩ :=
(Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp
((congr_arg _ (H.normalCore.index_eq_card.trans hn)).mp
(Subgroup.index_dvd_of_le H.normalCore_le))
exact ⟨k, hk2⟩
#align is_p_group.index IsPGroup.index
theorem card_eq_or_dvd : Nat.card G = 1 ∨ p ∣ Nat.card G := by
cases fintypeOrInfinite G
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := iff_card.mp hG
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, hn]
cases' n with n n
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨p ^ n, by rw [pow_succ']⟩
· rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite]
exact Or.inr ⟨0, rfl⟩
#align is_p_group.card_eq_or_dvd IsPGroup.card_eq_or_dvd
theorem nontrivial_iff_card [Fintype G] : Nontrivial G ↔ ∃ n > 0, card G = p ^ n :=
⟨fun hGnt =>
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := iff_card.1 hG
⟨k,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero fun hk0 => by
rw [hk0, pow_zero] at hk; exact Fintype.one_lt_card.ne' hk,
hk⟩,
fun ⟨k, hk0, hk⟩ =>
one_lt_card_iff_nontrivial.1 <|
hk.symm ▸ one_lt_pow (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt (ne_of_gt hk0)⟩
#align is_p_group.nontrivial_iff_card IsPGroup.nontrivial_iff_card
variable {α : Type*} [MulAction G α]
theorem card_orbit (a : α) [Fintype (orbit G a)] : ∃ n : ℕ, card (orbit G a) = p ^ n := by
let ϕ := orbitEquivQuotientStabilizer G a
haveI := Fintype.ofEquiv (orbit G a) ϕ
haveI := (stabilizer G a).finiteIndex_of_finite_quotient
rw [card_congr ϕ, ← Subgroup.index_eq_card]
exact hG.index (stabilizer G a)
#align is_p_group.card_orbit IsPGroup.card_orbit
variable (α) [Fintype α]
theorem card_modEq_card_fixedPoints [Fintype (fixedPoints G α)] :
card α ≡ card (fixedPoints G α) [MOD p] := by
classical
calc
card α = card (Σy : Quotient (orbitRel G α), { x // Quotient.mk'' x = y }) :=
card_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv (@Quotient.mk'' _ (orbitRel G α))).symm
_ = ∑ a : Quotient (orbitRel G α), card { x // Quotient.mk'' x = a } := card_sigma
_ ≡ ∑ _a : fixedPoints G α, 1 [MOD p] := ?_
_ = _ := by simp
rw [← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat p, Nat.cast_sum, Nat.cast_sum]
have key :
∀ x,
card { y // (Quotient.mk'' y : Quotient (orbitRel G α)) = Quotient.mk'' x } =
card (orbit G x) :=
fun x => by simp only [Quotient.eq'']; congr
refine
Eq.symm
(Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero (fun a _ _ => Quotient.mk'' a.1) (fun _ _ _ => Finset.mem_univ _)
(fun a₁ _ _ a₂ _ _ h =>
Subtype.eq (mem_fixedPoints'.mp a₂.2 a₁.1 (Quotient.exact' h)))
(fun b => Quotient.inductionOn' b fun b _ hb => ?_) fun a ha _ => by
rw [key, mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.mp a.2])
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hG.card_orbit b
have : k = 0 :=
Nat.le_zero.1
(Nat.le_of_lt_succ
(lt_of_not_ge
(mt (pow_dvd_pow p)
(by
rwa [pow_one, ← hk, ← Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, ← ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat, ← key,
Nat.cast_zero]))))
exact
⟨⟨b, mem_fixedPoints_iff_card_orbit_eq_one.2 <| by rw [hk, this, pow_zero]⟩,
Finset.mem_univ _, ne_of_eq_of_ne Nat.cast_one one_ne_zero, rfl⟩
#align is_p_group.card_modeq_card_fixed_points IsPGroup.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints
theorem nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card (hpα : ¬p ∣ card α) [Finite (fixedPoints G α)] :
(fixedPoints G α).Nonempty :=
@Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype _ _
(by
cases nonempty_fintype (fixedPoints G α)
rw [← card_pos_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hpα
rw [← Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd, ← hpα]
exact hG.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints α)
#align is_p_group.nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card IsPGroup.nonempty_fixed_point_of_prime_not_dvd_card
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PGroup.lean | 232 | 241 | theorem exists_fixed_point_of_prime_dvd_card_of_fixed_point (hpα : p ∣ card α) {a : α}
(ha : a ∈ fixedPoints G α) : ∃ b, b ∈ fixedPoints G α ∧ a ≠ b := by |
cases nonempty_fintype (fixedPoints G α)
have hpf : p ∣ card (fixedPoints G α) :=
Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd.mp ((hG.card_modEq_card_fixedPoints α).symm.trans hpα.modEq_zero_nat)
have hα : 1 < card (fixedPoints G α) :=
(Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).one_lt.trans_le (Nat.le_of_dvd (card_pos_iff.2 ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩) hpf)
exact
let ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, hba⟩ := exists_ne_of_one_lt_card hα ⟨a, ha⟩
⟨b, hb, fun hab => hba (by simp_rw [hab])⟩
|
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_symm_diff toDual_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_bihimp ofDual_bihimp
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
#align symm_diff_comm symmDiff_comm
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
#align symm_diff_is_comm symmDiff_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
#align symm_diff_self symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_bot symmDiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
#align bot_symm_diff bot_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
#align symm_diff_eq_bot symmDiff_eq_bot
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_le symmDiff_of_le
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_ge symmDiff_of_ge
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
#align symm_diff_le symmDiff_le
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align symm_diff_le_iff symmDiff_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
#align symm_diff_le_sup symmDiff_le_sup
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.symm_diff_eq_sup Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff symmDiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_inf symmDiff_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
#align symm_diff_sdiff_eq_sup symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_eq_sup sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
#align symm_diff_sup_inf symmDiff_sup_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align inf_sup_symm_diff inf_sup_symmDiff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 204 | 205 | theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by |
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
#align orientation.det_rotation Orientation.det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
#align orientation.linear_equiv_det_rotation Orientation.linearEquiv_det_rotation
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align orientation.rotation_symm Orientation.rotation_symm
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_zero Orientation.rotation_zero
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi Orientation.rotation_pi
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
#align orientation.rotation_pi_apply Orientation.rotation_pi_apply
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.rotation_pi_div_two
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 162 | 168 | theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by |
simp only [o.rotation_apply, ← mul_smul, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, add_smul,
sub_smul, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, smul_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, smul_neg]
ring_nf
abel
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.zmod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74ad1c88c77e799d2fea62801d1dbbd698cff1b7"
assert_not_exists Submodule
open Function
namespace ZMod
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
#align zmod.val ZMod.val
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
#align zmod.val_lt ZMod.val_lt
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
#align zmod.val_le ZMod.val_le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
#align zmod.val_zero ZMod.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
#align zmod.val_one' ZMod.val_one'
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
#align zmod.val_neg' ZMod.val_neg'
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
#align zmod.val_mul' ZMod.val_mul'
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_ofNat a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
#align zmod.val_nat_cast ZMod.val_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
theorem val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast_of_lt := val_natCast_of_lt
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff' := by
intro k
cases' n with n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
#align zmod.add_order_of_one ZMod.addOrderOf_one
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
cases' a with a
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe ZMod.addOrderOf_coe
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe' ZMod.addOrderOf_coe'
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
#align zmod.ring_char_zmod_n ZMod.ringChar_zmod_n
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
#align zmod.nat_cast_self ZMod.natCast_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
#align zmod.nat_cast_self' ZMod.natCast_self'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self' := natCast_self'
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
#align zmod.cast ZMod.cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
#align zmod.cast_zero ZMod.cast_zero
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.cast_eq_val ZMod.cast_eq_val
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.fst_zmod_cast Prod.fst_zmod_cast
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.snd_zmod_cast Prod.snd_zmod_cast
end
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_val ZMod.natCast_zmod_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_val := natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
#align zmod.nat_cast_right_inverse ZMod.natCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_rightInverse := natCast_rightInverse
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_surjective ZMod.natCast_zmod_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_surjective := natCast_zmod_surjective
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
erw [Int.cast_natCast, Fin.cast_val_eq_self]
#align zmod.int_cast_zmod_cast ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_cast := intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
#align zmod.int_cast_right_inverse ZMod.intCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_rightInverse := intCast_rightInverse
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.int_cast_surjective ZMod.intCast_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_surjective := intCast_surjective
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
#align zmod.cast_id ZMod.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
#align zmod.cast_id' ZMod.cast_id'
variable (R) [Ring R]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.nat_cast_comp_val ZMod.natCast_comp_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_comp_val := natCast_comp_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
#align zmod.int_cast_comp_cast ZMod.intCast_comp_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_comp_cast := intCast_comp_cast
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
#align zmod.nat_cast_val ZMod.natCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_val := natCast_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
#align zmod.int_cast_cast ZMod.intCast_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_cast := intCast_cast
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
cases' n with n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.ofNat_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
#align zmod.coe_add_eq_ite ZMod.cast_add_eq_ite
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff := intCast_eq_intCast_iff
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff' ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff' := intCast_eq_intCast_iff'
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.nat_coe_eq_nat_coe_iff ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_nat_cast_iff := natCast_eq_natCast_iff
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.nat_coe_eq_nat_coe_iff' ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_nat_cast_iff' := natCast_eq_natCast_iff'
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd := intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff_dvd_sub ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff_dvd_sub := intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd := natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
#align zmod.val_int_cast ZMod.val_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_int_cast := val_intCast
theorem coe_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
#align zmod.coe_int_cast ZMod.coe_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_int_cast := coe_intCast
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
#align zmod.val_neg_one ZMod.val_neg_one
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
cases' n with n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align zmod.cast_neg_one ZMod.cast_neg_one
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
#align zmod.cast_sub_one ZMod.cast_sub_one
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
#align zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_iff ZMod.natCast_eq_iff
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
#align zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_iff ZMod.intCast_eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias nat_coe_zmod_eq_iff := natCast_eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias int_coe_zmod_eq_iff := intCast_eq_iff
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
#align zmod.int_cast_mod ZMod.intCast_mod
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_mod := intCast_mod
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.ker_int_cast_add_hom ZMod.ker_intCastAddHom
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ker_int_castAddHom := ker_intCastAddHom
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
-- Porting note: commented
-- unseal Int.NonNeg
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
#align zmod.nat_cast_to_nat ZMod.natCast_toNat
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_toNat := natCast_toNat
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
#align zmod.val_injective ZMod.val_injective
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
#align zmod.val_one_eq_one_mod ZMod.val_one_eq_one_mod
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
#align zmod.val_one ZMod.val_one
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
#align zmod.val_add ZMod.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.val]; apply Int.natAbs_add_le
· simp [ZMod.val_add]; apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
#align zmod.val_mul ZMod.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
#align zmod.nontrivial ZMod.nontrivial
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
#align zmod.nontrivial' ZMod.nontrivial'
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
#align zmod.inv ZMod.inv
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
#align zmod.inv_zero ZMod.inv_zero
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
cases' n with n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
#align zmod.mul_inv_eq_gcd ZMod.mul_inv_eq_gcd
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 836 | 840 | theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by |
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.ContinuantsRecurrence
import Mathlib.Algebra.ContinuedFractions.TerminatedStable
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import algebra.continued_fractions.convergents_equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
variable {K : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace GeneralizedContinuedFraction
variable {g : GeneralizedContinuedFraction K} {s : Stream'.Seq <| Pair K}
section Squash
section WithDivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing K]
def squashSeq (s : Stream'.Seq <| Pair K) (n : ℕ) : Stream'.Seq (Pair K) :=
match Prod.mk (s.get? n) (s.get? (n + 1)) with
| ⟨some gp_n, some gp_succ_n⟩ =>
Stream'.Seq.nats.zipWith
-- return the squashed value at position `n`; otherwise, do nothing.
(fun n' gp => if n' = n then ⟨gp_n.a, gp_n.b + gp_succ_n.a / gp_succ_n.b⟩ else gp) s
| _ => s
#align generalized_continued_fraction.squash_seq GeneralizedContinuedFraction.squashSeq
theorem squashSeq_eq_self_of_terminated (terminated_at_succ_n : s.TerminatedAt (n + 1)) :
squashSeq s n = s := by
change s.get? (n + 1) = none at terminated_at_succ_n
cases s_nth_eq : s.get? n <;> simp only [*, squashSeq]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.squash_seq_eq_self_of_terminated GeneralizedContinuedFraction.squashSeq_eq_self_of_terminated
theorem squashSeq_nth_of_not_terminated {gp_n gp_succ_n : Pair K} (s_nth_eq : s.get? n = some gp_n)
(s_succ_nth_eq : s.get? (n + 1) = some gp_succ_n) :
(squashSeq s n).get? n = some ⟨gp_n.a, gp_n.b + gp_succ_n.a / gp_succ_n.b⟩ := by
simp [*, squashSeq]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.squash_seq_nth_of_not_terminated GeneralizedContinuedFraction.squashSeq_nth_of_not_terminated
theorem squashSeq_nth_of_lt {m : ℕ} (m_lt_n : m < n) : (squashSeq s n).get? m = s.get? m := by
cases s_succ_nth_eq : s.get? (n + 1) with
| none => rw [squashSeq_eq_self_of_terminated s_succ_nth_eq]
| some =>
obtain ⟨gp_n, s_nth_eq⟩ : ∃ gp_n, s.get? n = some gp_n :=
s.ge_stable n.le_succ s_succ_nth_eq
obtain ⟨gp_m, s_mth_eq⟩ : ∃ gp_m, s.get? m = some gp_m :=
s.ge_stable (le_of_lt m_lt_n) s_nth_eq
simp [*, squashSeq, m_lt_n.ne]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.squash_seq_nth_of_lt GeneralizedContinuedFraction.squashSeq_nth_of_lt
theorem squashSeq_succ_n_tail_eq_squashSeq_tail_n :
(squashSeq s (n + 1)).tail = squashSeq s.tail n := by
cases s_succ_succ_nth_eq : s.get? (n + 2) with
| none =>
cases s_succ_nth_eq : s.get? (n + 1) <;>
simp only [squashSeq, Stream'.Seq.get?_tail, s_succ_nth_eq, s_succ_succ_nth_eq]
| some gp_succ_succ_n =>
obtain ⟨gp_succ_n, s_succ_nth_eq⟩ : ∃ gp_succ_n, s.get? (n + 1) = some gp_succ_n :=
s.ge_stable (n + 1).le_succ s_succ_succ_nth_eq
-- apply extensionality with `m` and continue by cases `m = n`.
ext1 m
cases' Decidable.em (m = n) with m_eq_n m_ne_n
· simp [*, squashSeq]
· cases s_succ_mth_eq : s.get? (m + 1)
· simp only [*, squashSeq, Stream'.Seq.get?_tail, Stream'.Seq.get?_zipWith,
Option.map₂_none_right]
· simp [*, squashSeq]
#align generalized_continued_fraction.squash_seq_succ_n_tail_eq_squash_seq_tail_n GeneralizedContinuedFraction.squashSeq_succ_n_tail_eq_squashSeq_tail_n
| Mathlib/Algebra/ContinuedFractions/ConvergentsEquiv.lean | 155 | 181 | theorem succ_succ_nth_convergent'_aux_eq_succ_nth_convergent'_aux_squashSeq :
convergents'Aux s (n + 2) = convergents'Aux (squashSeq s n) (n + 1) := by |
cases s_succ_nth_eq : s.get? <| n + 1 with
| none =>
rw [squashSeq_eq_self_of_terminated s_succ_nth_eq,
convergents'Aux_stable_step_of_terminated s_succ_nth_eq]
| some gp_succ_n =>
induction n generalizing s gp_succ_n with
| zero =>
obtain ⟨gp_head, s_head_eq⟩ : ∃ gp_head, s.head = some gp_head :=
s.ge_stable zero_le_one s_succ_nth_eq
have : (squashSeq s 0).head = some ⟨gp_head.a, gp_head.b + gp_succ_n.a / gp_succ_n.b⟩ :=
squashSeq_nth_of_not_terminated s_head_eq s_succ_nth_eq
simp_all [convergents'Aux, Stream'.Seq.head, Stream'.Seq.get?_tail]
| succ m IH =>
obtain ⟨gp_head, s_head_eq⟩ : ∃ gp_head, s.head = some gp_head :=
s.ge_stable (m + 2).zero_le s_succ_nth_eq
suffices
gp_head.a / (gp_head.b + convergents'Aux s.tail (m + 2)) =
convergents'Aux (squashSeq s (m + 1)) (m + 2)
by simpa only [convergents'Aux, s_head_eq]
have : convergents'Aux s.tail (m + 2) = convergents'Aux (squashSeq s.tail m) (m + 1) := by
refine IH gp_succ_n ?_
simpa [Stream'.Seq.get?_tail] using s_succ_nth_eq
have : (squashSeq s (m + 1)).head = some gp_head :=
(squashSeq_nth_of_lt m.succ_pos).trans s_head_eq
simp_all [convergents'Aux, squashSeq_succ_n_tail_eq_squashSeq_tail_n]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.TrailingDegree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
#align_import data.polynomial.reverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"44de64f183393284a16016dfb2a48ac97382f2bd"
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
def revAtFun (N i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun Polynomial.revAtFun
theorem revAtFun_invol {N i : ℕ} : revAtFun N (revAtFun N i) = i := by
unfold revAtFun
split_ifs with h j
· exact tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h
· exfalso
apply j
exact Nat.sub_le N i
· rfl
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_invol Polynomial.revAtFun_invol
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Reverse.lean | 50 | 52 | theorem revAtFun_inj {N : ℕ} : Function.Injective (revAtFun N) := by |
intro a b hab
rw [← @revAtFun_invol N a, hab, revAtFun_invol]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
#align_import computability.encoding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b6395b3a5acd655b16385fa0cdbf1961d6c34b3e"
universe u v
open Cardinal
namespace Computability
structure Encoding (α : Type u) where
Γ : Type v
encode : α → List Γ
decode : List Γ → Option α
decode_encode : ∀ x, decode (encode x) = some x
#align computability.encoding Computability.Encoding
| Mathlib/Computability/Encoding.lean | 43 | 45 | theorem Encoding.encode_injective {α : Type u} (e : Encoding α) : Function.Injective e.encode := by |
refine fun _ _ h => Option.some_injective _ ?_
rw [← e.decode_encode, ← e.decode_encode, h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Pow
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Ring
open Mathlib.Meta Qq NormNum Lean.Meta AtomM
open Lean (MetaM Expr mkRawNatLit)
def instCommSemiringNat : CommSemiring ℕ := inferInstance
def sℕ : Q(CommSemiring ℕ) := q(instCommSemiringNat)
-- In this file, we would like to use multi-character auto-implicits.
set_option relaxedAutoImplicit true
mutual
inductive ExBase : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| atom (id : ℕ) : ExBase sα e
| sum (_ : ExSum sα e) : ExBase sα e
inductive ExProd : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| const (value : ℚ) (hyp : Option Expr := none) : ExProd sα e
| mul {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {x : Q($α)} {e : Q(ℕ)} {b : Q($α)} :
ExBase sα x → ExProd sℕ e → ExProd sα b → ExProd sα q($x ^ $e * $b)
inductive ExSum : ∀ {α : Q(Type u)}, Q(CommSemiring $α) → (e : Q($α)) → Type
| zero {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} : ExSum sα q(0 : $α)
| add {α : Q(Type u)} {sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)} {a b : Q($α)} :
ExProd sα a → ExSum sα b → ExSum sα q($a + $b)
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
partial def ExBase.eq : ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Bool
| .atom i, .atom j => i == j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.eq b
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExProd.eq : ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Bool
| .const i _, .const j _ => i == j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂ && a₃.eq b₃
| _, _ => false
@[inherit_doc ExBase.eq]
partial def ExSum.eq : ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Bool
| .zero, .zero => true
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => a₁.eq b₁ && a₂.eq b₂
| _, _ => false
end
mutual -- partial only to speed up compilation
partial def ExBase.cmp : ExBase sα a → ExBase sα b → Ordering
| .atom i, .atom j => compare i j
| .sum a, .sum b => a.cmp b
| .atom .., .sum .. => .lt
| .sum .., .atom .. => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExProd.cmp : ExProd sα a → ExProd sα b → Ordering
| .const i _, .const j _ => compare i j
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃, .mul b₁ b₂ b₃ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂) |>.then (a₃.cmp b₃)
| .const _ _, .mul .. => .lt
| .mul .., .const _ _ => .gt
@[inherit_doc ExBase.cmp]
partial def ExSum.cmp : ExSum sα a → ExSum sα b → Ordering
| .zero, .zero => .eq
| .add a₁ a₂, .add b₁ b₂ => (a₁.cmp b₁).then (a₂.cmp b₂)
| .zero, .add .. => .lt
| .add .., .zero => .gt
end
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExBase sα) e) := ⟨default, .atom 0⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExSum sα) e) := ⟨_, .zero⟩
instance : Inhabited (Σ e, (ExProd sα) e) := ⟨default, .const 0 none⟩
mutual
partial def ExBase.cast : ExBase sα a → Σ a, ExBase sβ a
| .atom i => ⟨a, .atom i⟩
| .sum a => let ⟨_, vb⟩ := a.cast; ⟨_, .sum vb⟩
partial def ExProd.cast : ExProd sα a → Σ a, ExProd sβ a
| .const i h => ⟨a, .const i h⟩
| .mul a₁ a₂ a₃ => ⟨_, .mul a₁.cast.2 a₂ a₃.cast.2⟩
partial def ExSum.cast : ExSum sα a → Σ a, ExSum sβ a
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero⟩
| .add a₁ a₂ => ⟨_, .add a₁.cast.2 a₂.cast.2⟩
end
structure Result {α : Q(Type u)} (E : Q($α) → Type) (e : Q($α)) where
expr : Q($α)
val : E expr
proof : Q($e = $expr)
instance [Inhabited (Σ e, E e)] : Inhabited (Result E e) :=
let ⟨e', v⟩ : Σ e, E e := default; ⟨e', v, default⟩
variable {α : Q(Type u)} (sα : Q(CommSemiring $α)) [CommSemiring R]
def ExProd.mkNat (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q(($lit).rawCast : $α), .const n none⟩
def ExProd.mkNegNat (_ : Q(Ring $α)) (n : ℕ) : (e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
let lit : Q(ℕ) := mkRawNatLit n
⟨q((Int.negOfNat $lit).rawCast : $α), .const (-n) none⟩
def ExProd.mkRat (_ : Q(DivisionRing $α)) (q : ℚ) (n : Q(ℤ)) (d : Q(ℕ)) (h : Expr) :
(e : Q($α)) × ExProd sα e :=
⟨q(Rat.rawCast $n $d : $α), .const q h⟩
section
variable {sα}
def ExBase.toProd (va : ExBase sα a) (vb : ExProd sℕ b) :
ExProd sα q($a ^ $b * (nat_lit 1).rawCast) := .mul va vb (.const 1 none)
def ExProd.toSum (v : ExProd sα e) : ExSum sα q($e + 0) := .add v .zero
def ExProd.coeff : ExProd sα e → ℚ
| .const q _ => q
| .mul _ _ v => v.coeff
end
inductive Overlap (e : Q($α)) where
| zero (_ : Q(IsNat $e (nat_lit 0)))
| nonzero (_ : Result (ExProd sα) e)
theorem add_overlap_pf (x : R) (e) (pq_pf : a + b = c) :
x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b = x ^ e * c := by subst_vars; simp [mul_add]
theorem add_overlap_pf_zero (x : R) (e) :
IsNat (a + b) (nat_lit 0) → IsNat (x ^ e * a + x ^ e * b) (nat_lit 0)
| ⟨h⟩ => ⟨by simp [h, ← mul_add]⟩
def evalAddOverlap (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) : Option (Overlap sα q($a + $b)) :=
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb => do
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let res ← NormNum.evalAdd.core q($a + $b) q(HAdd.hAdd) a b ra rb
match res with
| .isNat _ (.lit (.natVal 0)) p => pure <| .zero p
| rc =>
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ ← rc.toRatNZ
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
pure <| .nonzero ⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ => do
guard (va₁.eq vb₁ && va₂.eq vb₂)
match ← evalAddOverlap va₃ vb₃ with
| .zero p => pure <| .zero (q(add_overlap_pf_zero $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)
| .nonzero ⟨_, vc, p⟩ =>
pure <| .nonzero ⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(add_overlap_pf $a₁ $a₂ $p) : Expr)⟩
| _, _ => none
theorem add_pf_zero_add (b : R) : 0 + b = b := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_zero (a : R) : a + 0 = a := by simp
theorem add_pf_add_overlap
(_ : a₁ + b₁ = c₁) (_ : a₂ + b₂ = c₂) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c₁ + c₂ := by
subst_vars; simp [add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem add_pf_add_overlap_zero
(h : IsNat (a₁ + b₁) (nat_lit 0)) (h₄ : a₂ + b₂ = c) : (a₁ + a₂ : R) + (b₁ + b₂) = c := by
subst_vars; rw [add_add_add_comm, h.1, Nat.cast_zero, add_pf_zero_add]
theorem add_pf_add_lt (a₁ : R) (_ : a₂ + b = c) : (a₁ + a₂) + b = a₁ + c := by simp [*, add_assoc]
theorem add_pf_add_gt (b₁ : R) (_ : a + b₂ = c) : a + (b₁ + b₂) = b₁ + c := by
subst_vars; simp [add_left_comm]
partial def evalAdd (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) : Result (ExSum sα) q($a + $b) :=
match va, vb with
| .zero, vb => ⟨b, vb, q(add_pf_zero_add $b)⟩
| va, .zero => ⟨a, va, q(add_pf_add_zero $a)⟩
| .add (a := a₁) (b := _a₂) va₁ va₂, .add (a := b₁) (b := _b₂) vb₁ vb₂ =>
match evalAddOverlap sα va₁ vb₁ with
| some (.nonzero ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩) =>
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ := evalAdd va₂ vb₂
⟨_, .add vc₁ vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| some (.zero pc₁) =>
let ⟨c₂, vc₂, pc₂⟩ := evalAdd va₂ vb₂
⟨c₂, vc₂, q(add_pf_add_overlap_zero $pc₁ $pc₂)⟩
| none =>
if let .lt := va₁.cmp vb₁ then
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($_a₂ + ($b₁ + $_b₂) = $_c))⟩ := evalAdd va₂ vb
⟨_, .add va₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_lt $a₁ $pc)⟩
else
let ⟨_c, vc, (pc : Q($a₁ + $_a₂ + $_b₂ = $_c))⟩ := evalAdd va vb₂
⟨_, .add vb₁ vc, q(add_pf_add_gt $b₁ $pc)⟩
theorem one_mul (a : R) : (nat_lit 1).rawCast * a = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_one (a : R) : a * (nat_lit 1).rawCast = a := by simp [Nat.rawCast]
theorem mul_pf_left (a₁ : R) (a₂) (_ : a₃ * b = c) : (a₁ ^ a₂ * a₃ : R) * b = a₁ ^ a₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_assoc]
theorem mul_pf_right (b₁ : R) (b₂) (_ : a * b₃ = c) : a * (b₁ ^ b₂ * b₃) = b₁ ^ b₂ * c := by
subst_vars; rw [mul_left_comm]
theorem mul_pp_pf_overlap (x : R) (_ : ea + eb = e) (_ : a₂ * b₂ = c) :
(x ^ ea * a₂ : R) * (x ^ eb * b₂) = x ^ e * c := by
subst_vars; simp [pow_add, mul_mul_mul_comm]
partial def evalMulProd (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExProd sα b) : Result (ExProd sα) q($a * $b) :=
match va, vb with
| .const za ha, .const zb hb =>
if za = 1 then
⟨b, .const zb hb, (q(one_mul $b) : Expr)⟩
else if zb = 1 then
⟨a, .const za ha, (q(mul_one $a) : Expr)⟩
else
let ra := Result.ofRawRat za a ha; let rb := Result.ofRawRat zb b hb
let rc := (NormNum.evalMul.core q($a * $b) q(HMul.hMul) _ _
q(CommSemiring.toSemiring) ra rb).get!
let ⟨zc, hc⟩ := rc.toRatNZ.get!
let ⟨c, pc⟩ := rc.toRawEq
⟨c, .const zc hc, pc⟩
| .mul (x := a₁) (e := a₂) va₁ va₂ va₃, .const _ _ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ := evalMulProd va₃ vb
⟨_, .mul va₁ va₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_left $a₁ $a₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .const _ _, .mul (x := b₁) (e := b₂) vb₁ vb₂ vb₃ =>
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ := evalMulProd va vb₃
⟨_, .mul vb₁ vb₂ vc, (q(mul_pf_right $b₁ $b₂ $pc) : Expr)⟩
| .mul (x := xa) (e := ea) vxa vea va₂, .mul (x := xb) (e := eb) vxb veb vb₂ => Id.run do
if vxa.eq vxb then
if let some (.nonzero ⟨_, ve, pe⟩) := evalAddOverlap sℕ vea veb then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ := evalMulProd va₂ vb₂
return ⟨_, .mul vxa ve vc, (q(mul_pp_pf_overlap $xa $pe $pc) : Expr)⟩
if let .lt := (vxa.cmp vxb).then (vea.cmp veb) then
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ := evalMulProd va₂ vb
⟨_, .mul vxa vea vc, (q(mul_pf_left $xa $ea $pc) : Expr)⟩
else
let ⟨_, vc, pc⟩ := evalMulProd va vb₂
⟨_, .mul vxb veb vc, (q(mul_pf_right $xb $eb $pc) : Expr)⟩
theorem mul_zero (a : R) : a * 0 = 0 := by simp
theorem mul_add (_ : (a : R) * b₁ = c₁) (_ : a * b₂ = c₂) (_ : c₁ + 0 + c₂ = d) :
a * (b₁ + b₂) = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.mul_add]
def evalMul₁ (va : ExProd sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) : Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) :=
match vb with
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero, q(mul_zero $a)⟩
| .add vb₁ vb₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ := evalMulProd sα va vb₁
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ := evalMul₁ va vb₂
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ := evalAdd sα vc₁.toSum vc₂
⟨_, vd, q(mul_add $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
theorem zero_mul (b : R) : 0 * b = 0 := by simp
theorem add_mul (_ : (a₁ : R) * b = c₁) (_ : a₂ * b = c₂) (_ : c₁ + c₂ = d) :
(a₁ + a₂) * b = d := by subst_vars; simp [_root_.add_mul]
def evalMul (va : ExSum sα a) (vb : ExSum sα b) : Result (ExSum sα) q($a * $b) :=
match va with
| .zero => ⟨_, .zero, q(zero_mul $b)⟩
| .add va₁ va₂ =>
let ⟨_, vc₁, pc₁⟩ := evalMul₁ sα va₁ vb
let ⟨_, vc₂, pc₂⟩ := evalMul va₂ vb
let ⟨_, vd, pd⟩ := evalAdd sα vc₁ vc₂
⟨_, vd, q(add_mul $pc₁ $pc₂ $pd)⟩
| Mathlib/Tactic/Ring/Basic.lean | 451 | 451 | theorem natCast_nat (n) : ((Nat.rawCast n : ℕ) : R) = Nat.rawCast n := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ico_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ioc_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIocMod
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
#align real.angle.to_real Real.Angle.toReal
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe Real.Angle.toReal_coe
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
#align real.angle.to_real_injective Real.Angle.toReal_injective
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
#align real.angle.to_real_inj Real.Angle.toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
#align real.angle.coe_to_real Real.Angle.coe_toReal
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
#align real.angle.neg_pi_lt_to_real Real.Angle.neg_pi_lt_toReal
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
#align real.angle.to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.toReal_le_pi
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.abs_toReal_le_pi
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
#align real.angle.to_Ioc_mod_to_real Real.Angle.toIocMod_toReal
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_zero Real.Angle.toReal_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 592 | 594 | theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by |
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RingHomProperties
#align_import ring_theory.ring_hom.finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b5aecf07a179c60b6b37c1ac9da952f3b565c785"
namespace RingHom
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct Algebra.TensorProduct
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RingHom/Finite.lean | 23 | 25 | theorem finite_stableUnderComposition : StableUnderComposition @Finite := by |
introv R hf hg
exact hg.comp hf
|
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
#align_import data.real.sign from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
namespace Real
noncomputable def sign (r : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if r < 0 then -1 else if 0 < r then 1 else 0
#align real.sign Real.sign
theorem sign_of_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : sign r = -1 := by rw [sign, if_pos hr]
#align real.sign_of_neg Real.sign_of_neg
theorem sign_of_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : sign r = 1 := by rw [sign, if_pos hr, if_neg hr.not_lt]
#align real.sign_of_pos Real.sign_of_pos
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Sign.lean | 43 | 43 | theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := by | rw [sign, if_neg (lt_irrefl _), if_neg (lt_irrefl _)]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLatticeIntervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Monotone
#align_import topology.algebra.order.intermediate_value from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
open Filter OrderDual TopologicalSpace Function Set
open Topology Filter
universe u v w
section
variable {X : Type u} {α : Type v} [TopologicalSpace X] [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OrderClosedTopology α]
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂ [PreconnectedSpace X] {a b : X} {f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (hb : g b ≤ f b) : ∃ x, f x = g x := by
obtain ⟨x, _, hfg, hgf⟩ : (univ ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x ∧ g x ≤ f x }).Nonempty :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 PreconnectedSpace.isPreconnected_univ _ _ (isClosed_le hf hg)
(isClosed_le hg hf) (fun _ _ => le_total _ _) ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩ ⟨b, trivial, hb⟩
exact ⟨x, le_antisymm hfg hgf⟩
#align intermediate_value_univ₂ intermediate_value_univ₂
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ [PreconnectedSpace X] {a : X} {l : Filter X} [NeBot l]
{f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (he : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) :
∃ x, f x = g x :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := he.exists; intermediate_value_univ₂ hf hg ha h
#align intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ [PreconnectedSpace X] {l₁ l₂ : Filter X} [NeBot l₁]
[NeBot l₂] {f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (he₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l₁] g)
(he₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l₂] f) : ∃ x, f x = g x :=
let ⟨_, h₁⟩ := he₁.exists
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := he₂.exists
intermediate_value_univ₂ hf hg h₁ h₂
#align intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : X}
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f g : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(ha' : f a ≤ g a) (hb' : g b ≤ f b) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂ s α _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ _ _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf) (continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hg) ha'
hb'
⟨x, x.2, hx⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f g : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (ha' : f a ≤ g a) (he : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x := by
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf hg
obtain ⟨b, h⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ _
(comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl) _ _ hf hg ha' (he.comap _)
exact ⟨b, b.prop, h⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
{l₁ l₂ : Filter X} [NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f g : X → α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (he₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l₁] g) (he₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l₂] f) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x := by
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf hg
obtain ⟨b, h⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) _ _
(comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl₁) (comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl₂) _ _ hf hg
(he₁.comap _) (he₂.comap _)
exact ⟨b, b.prop, h⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : X} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' s := fun _x hx =>
hs.intermediate_value₂ ha hb hf continuousOn_const hx.1 hx.2
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value IsPreconnected.intermediate_value
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) {v : α}
(ht : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : Ico (f a) v ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl hf continuousOn_const h.1
(eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h.2 ht)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ico IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) {v : α}
(ht : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : Ioc v (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
(hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl continuousOn_const hf h.2
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h.1 ht)).imp fun _ h => h.imp_right Eq.symm
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v₁ v₂ : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ (𝓝 v₁)) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ (𝓝 v₂)) :
Ioo v₁ v₂ ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h.1 ht₁) (eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h.2 ht₂)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : Tendsto f l atTop) : Ici (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl hf continuousOn_const h (tendsto_atTop.1 ht y)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ici IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iic {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : Tendsto f l atBot) : Iic (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
(hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl continuousOn_const hf h (tendsto_atBot.1 ht y)).imp
fun _ h => h.imp_right Eq.symm
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iic IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iic
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ (𝓝 v)) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ atTop) : Ioi v ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h ht₁) (tendsto_atTop.1 ht₂ y)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iio {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ atBot) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ (𝓝 v)) : Iio v ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const (tendsto_atBot.1 ht₁ y)
(eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h ht₂)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iio IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iio
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iii {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ atBot) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ atTop) : univ ⊆ f '' s := fun y _ =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const (tendsto_atBot.1 ht₁ y)
(tendsto_atTop.1 ht₂ y)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iii IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iii
theorem intermediate_value_univ [PreconnectedSpace X] (a b : X) {f : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ range f := fun _ hx => intermediate_value_univ₂ hf continuous_const hx.1 hx.2
#align intermediate_value_univ intermediate_value_univ
theorem mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge [PreconnectedSpace X] {c : α} {f : X → α}
(hf : Continuous f) (h₁ : ∃ a, f a ≤ c) (h₂ : ∃ b, c ≤ f b) : c ∈ range f :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁; let ⟨b, hb⟩ := h₂; intermediate_value_univ a b hf ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge
theorem IsPreconnected.Icc_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) : Icc a b ⊆ s := by
simpa only [image_id] using hs.intermediate_value ha hb continuousOn_id
#align is_preconnected.Icc_subset IsPreconnected.Icc_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.ordConnected {s : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected s) : OrdConnected s :=
⟨fun _ hx _ hy => h.Icc_subset hx hy⟩
#align is_preconnected.ord_connected IsPreconnected.ordConnected
theorem IsConnected.Icc_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsConnected s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) : Icc a b ⊆ s :=
hs.2.Icc_subset ha hb
#align is_connected.Icc_subset IsConnected.Icc_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : ¬BddBelow s)
(ha : ¬BddAbove s) : s = univ := by
refine eq_univ_of_forall fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := not_bddBelow_iff.1 hb x
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bddAbove_iff.1 ha x
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
#align is_preconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded IsPreconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded
end
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] [Nonempty γ]
theorem IsConnected.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsConnected s) (hb : BddBelow s)
(ha : BddAbove s) : Ioo (sInf s) (sSup s) ⊆ s := fun _x hx =>
let ⟨_y, ys, hy⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_csInf hs.nonempty hb)).1 hx.1
let ⟨_z, zs, hz⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff (isLUB_csSup hs.nonempty ha)).1 hx.2
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨hy.le, hz.le⟩
#align is_connected.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset IsConnected.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset
theorem eq_Icc_csInf_csSup_of_connected_bdd_closed {s : Set α} (hc : IsConnected s)
(hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (hcl : IsClosed s) : s = Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
(subset_Icc_csInf_csSup hb ha).antisymm <|
hc.Icc_subset (hcl.csInf_mem hc.nonempty hb) (hcl.csSup_mem hc.nonempty ha)
#align eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed eq_Icc_csInf_csSup_of_connected_bdd_closed
theorem IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : BddBelow s)
(ha : ¬BddAbove s) : Ioi (sInf s) ⊆ s := fun x hx =>
have sne : s.Nonempty := nonempty_of_not_bddAbove ha
let ⟨_y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := (isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_csInf sne hb)).1 hx
let ⟨_z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bddAbove_iff.1 ha x
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨hy.le, hz.le⟩
#align is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.Iio_csSup_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : ¬BddBelow s)
(ha : BddAbove s) : Iio (sSup s) ⊆ s :=
IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ha hb
#align is_preconnected.Iio_cSup_subset IsPreconnected.Iio_csSup_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.mem_intervals {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ∈
({Icc (sInf s) (sSup s), Ico (sInf s) (sSup s), Ioc (sInf s) (sSup s), Ioo (sInf s) (sSup s),
Ici (sInf s), Ioi (sInf s), Iic (sSup s), Iio (sSup s), univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· apply_rules [Or.inr, mem_singleton]
have hs' : IsConnected s := ⟨hne, hs⟩
by_cases hb : BddBelow s <;> by_cases ha : BddAbove s
· refine mem_of_subset_of_mem ?_ <| mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset
(hs'.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset hb ha) (subset_Icc_csInf_csSup hb ha)
simp only [insert_subset_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, true_or, or_true,
singleton_subset_iff, and_self]
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr ?_
cases'
mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Ioi_csInf_subset hb ha) fun x hx => csInf_le hb hx with
hs hs
· exact Or.inl hs
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hs)
· iterate 6 apply Or.inr
cases' mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Iio_csSup_subset hb ha) fun x hx => le_csSup ha hx
with hs hs
· exact Or.inl hs
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hs)
· iterate 8 apply Or.inr
exact Or.inl (hs.eq_univ_of_unbounded hb ha)
#align is_preconnected.mem_intervals IsPreconnected.mem_intervals
theorem setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered :
{ s : Set α | IsPreconnected s } ⊆
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) := by
intro s hs
rcases hs.mem_intervals with (hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs) <;> rw [hs] <;>
simp only [union_insert, union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_union, mem_range, Prod.exists,
uncurry_apply_pair, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or, or_true, exists_apply_eq_apply2]
#align set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hab : a ≤ b) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, (s ∩ Ioc x b).Nonempty) : b ∈ s := by
let S := s ∩ Icc a b
replace ha : a ∈ S := ⟨ha, left_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
have Sbd : BddAbove S := ⟨b, fun z hz => hz.2.2⟩
let c := sSup (s ∩ Icc a b)
have c_mem : c ∈ S := hs.csSup_mem ⟨_, ha⟩ Sbd
have c_le : c ≤ b := csSup_le ⟨_, ha⟩ fun x hx => hx.2.2
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le c_le with hc hc
· exact hc ▸ c_mem.1
exfalso
rcases hgt c ⟨c_mem.1, c_mem.2.1, hc⟩ with ⟨x, xs, cx, xb⟩
exact not_lt_of_le (le_csSup Sbd ⟨xs, le_trans (le_csSup Sbd ha) (le_of_lt cx), xb⟩) cx
#align is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt
theorem IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, ∀ y ∈ Ioi x, (s ∩ Ioc x y).Nonempty) : Icc a b ⊆ s := by
intro y hy
have : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a y) := by
suffices s ∩ Icc a y = s ∩ Icc a b ∩ Icc a y by
rw [this]
exact IsClosed.inter hs isClosed_Icc
rw [inter_assoc]
congr
exact (inter_eq_self_of_subset_right <| Icc_subset_Icc_right hy.2).symm
exact
IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt this ha hy.1 fun x hx =>
hgt x ⟨hx.1, Ico_subset_Ico_right hy.2 hx.2⟩ y hx.2.2
#align is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt
variable [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
theorem IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin {a b : α} {s : Set α}
(hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b)) (ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, s ∈ 𝓝[>] x) :
Icc a b ⊆ s := by
apply hs.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩ y hyxb
have : s ∩ Ioc x y ∈ 𝓝[>] x :=
inter_mem (hgt x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩) (Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hyxb⟩)
exact (nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨b, hxab.2⟩).nonempty_of_mem this
#align is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem isPreconnected_Icc_aux (x y : α) (s t : Set α) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hs : IsClosed s)
(ht : IsClosed t) (hab : Icc a b ⊆ s ∪ t) (hx : x ∈ Icc a b ∩ s) (hy : y ∈ Icc a b ∩ t) :
(Icc a b ∩ (s ∩ t)).Nonempty := by
have xyab : Icc x y ⊆ Icc a b := Icc_subset_Icc hx.1.1 hy.1.2
by_contra hst
suffices Icc x y ⊆ s from
hst ⟨y, xyab <| right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, this <| right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, hy.2⟩
apply (IsClosed.inter hs isClosed_Icc).Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin hx.2
rintro z ⟨zs, hz⟩
have zt : z ∈ tᶜ := fun zt => hst ⟨z, xyab <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hz, zs, zt⟩
have : tᶜ ∩ Ioc z y ∈ 𝓝[>] z := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi hz.2]
exact mem_nhdsWithin.2 ⟨tᶜ, ht.isOpen_compl, zt, Subset.rfl⟩
apply mem_of_superset this
have : Ioc z y ⊆ s ∪ t := fun w hw => hab (xyab ⟨le_trans hz.1 (le_of_lt hw.1), hw.2⟩)
exact fun w ⟨wt, wzy⟩ => (this wzy).elim id fun h => (wt h).elim
#align is_preconnected_Icc_aux isPreconnected_Icc_aux
theorem isPreconnected_Icc : IsPreconnected (Icc a b) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2
(by
rintro s t hs ht hab ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
-- This used to use `wlog`, but it was causing timeouts.
rcases le_total x y with h | h
· exact isPreconnected_Icc_aux x y s t h hs ht hab hx hy
· rw [inter_comm s t]
rw [union_comm s t] at hab
exact isPreconnected_Icc_aux y x t s h ht hs hab hy hx)
#align is_preconnected_Icc isPreconnected_Icc
theorem isPreconnected_uIcc : IsPreconnected (uIcc a b) :=
isPreconnected_Icc
#align is_preconnected_uIcc isPreconnected_uIcc
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : s.OrdConnected) : IsPreconnected s :=
isPreconnected_of_forall_pair fun x hx y hy =>
⟨uIcc x y, h.uIcc_subset hx hy, left_mem_uIcc, right_mem_uIcc, isPreconnected_uIcc⟩
#align set.ord_connected.is_preconnected Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected
theorem isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected {s : Set α} : IsPreconnected s ↔ OrdConnected s :=
⟨IsPreconnected.ordConnected, Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected⟩
#align is_preconnected_iff_ord_connected isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected
theorem isPreconnected_Ici : IsPreconnected (Ici a) :=
ordConnected_Ici.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ici isPreconnected_Ici
theorem isPreconnected_Iic : IsPreconnected (Iic a) :=
ordConnected_Iic.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Iic isPreconnected_Iic
theorem isPreconnected_Iio : IsPreconnected (Iio a) :=
ordConnected_Iio.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Iio isPreconnected_Iio
theorem isPreconnected_Ioi : IsPreconnected (Ioi a) :=
ordConnected_Ioi.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioi isPreconnected_Ioi
theorem isPreconnected_Ioo : IsPreconnected (Ioo a b) :=
ordConnected_Ioo.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioo isPreconnected_Ioo
theorem isPreconnected_Ioc : IsPreconnected (Ioc a b) :=
ordConnected_Ioc.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioc isPreconnected_Ioc
theorem isPreconnected_Ico : IsPreconnected (Ico a b) :=
ordConnected_Ico.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ico isPreconnected_Ico
theorem isConnected_Ici : IsConnected (Ici a) :=
⟨nonempty_Ici, isPreconnected_Ici⟩
#align is_connected_Ici isConnected_Ici
theorem isConnected_Iic : IsConnected (Iic a) :=
⟨nonempty_Iic, isPreconnected_Iic⟩
#align is_connected_Iic isConnected_Iic
theorem isConnected_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : IsConnected (Ioi a) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioi, isPreconnected_Ioi⟩
#align is_connected_Ioi isConnected_Ioi
theorem isConnected_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : IsConnected (Iio a) :=
⟨nonempty_Iio, isPreconnected_Iio⟩
#align is_connected_Iio isConnected_Iio
theorem isConnected_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsConnected (Icc a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Icc.2 h, isPreconnected_Icc⟩
#align is_connected_Icc isConnected_Icc
theorem isConnected_Ioo (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ioo a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioo.2 h, isPreconnected_Ioo⟩
#align is_connected_Ioo isConnected_Ioo
theorem isConnected_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ioc a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioc.2 h, isPreconnected_Ioc⟩
#align is_connected_Ioc isConnected_Ioc
theorem isConnected_Ico (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ico a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ico.2 h, isPreconnected_Ico⟩
#align is_connected_Ico isConnected_Ico
instance (priority := 100) ordered_connected_space : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨ordConnected_univ.isPreconnected⟩
#align ordered_connected_space ordered_connected_space
theorem setOf_isPreconnected_eq_of_ordered :
{ s : Set α | IsPreconnected s } =
-- bounded intervals
range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) := by
refine Subset.antisymm setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered ?_
simp only [subset_def, forall_mem_range, uncurry, or_imp, forall_and, mem_union,
mem_setOf_eq, insert_eq, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq, forall_true_iff, and_true_iff,
isPreconnected_Icc, isPreconnected_Ico, isPreconnected_Ioc, isPreconnected_Ioo,
isPreconnected_Ioi, isPreconnected_Iio, isPreconnected_Ici, isPreconnected_Iic,
isPreconnected_univ, isPreconnected_empty]
#align set_of_is_preconnected_eq_of_ordered setOf_isPreconnected_eq_of_ordered
lemma isTotallyDisconnected_iff_lt {s : Set α} :
IsTotallyDisconnected s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x < y → ∃ z ∉ s, z ∈ Ioo x y := by
simp only [IsTotallyDisconnected, isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected, ← not_nontrivial_iff,
nontrivial_iff_exists_lt, not_exists, not_and]
refine ⟨fun h x hx y hy hxy ↦ ?_, fun h t hts ht x hx y hy hxy ↦ ?_⟩
· simp_rw [← not_ordConnected_inter_Icc_iff hx hy]
exact fun hs ↦ h _ inter_subset_left hs _ ⟨hx, le_rfl, hxy.le⟩ _ ⟨hy, hxy.le, le_rfl⟩ hxy
· obtain ⟨z, h1z, h2z⟩ := h x (hts hx) y (hts hy) hxy
exact h1z <| hts <| ht.1 hx hy ⟨h2z.1.le, h2z.2.le⟩
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderClosedTopology δ]
theorem intermediate_value_Icc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Icc a b :=
isPreconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
#align intermediate_value_Icc intermediate_value_Icc
theorem intermediate_value_Icc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Icc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Icc a b :=
isPreconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
#align intermediate_value_Icc' intermediate_value_Icc'
theorem intermediate_value_uIcc {a b : α} {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (uIcc a b)) :
uIcc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' uIcc a b := by
cases le_total (f a) (f b) <;> simp [*, isPreconnected_uIcc.intermediate_value]
#align intermediate_value_uIcc intermediate_value_uIcc
theorem intermediate_value_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ico (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ico a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_lt_of_le (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ico _ _ ⟨refl a, hlt⟩
(right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ico intermediate_value_Ico
theorem intermediate_value_Ico' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ioc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ico a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_lt_of_le (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ico _ _ ⟨refl a, hlt⟩
(right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ico' intermediate_value_Ico'
theorem intermediate_value_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ioc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ioc a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_le_of_lt (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioc _ _ ⟨hlt, refl b⟩
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioc intermediate_value_Ioc
theorem intermediate_value_Ioc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ico (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ioc a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_le_of_lt (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioc _ _ ⟨hlt, refl b⟩
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioc' intermediate_value_Ioc'
theorem intermediate_value_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ioo (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ioo a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_lt_of_lt (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioo _ _
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) (right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) inf_le_right inf_le_right _
(hf.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) _ _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioo intermediate_value_Ioo
theorem intermediate_value_Ioo' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ioo (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ioo a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_lt_of_lt (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioo _ _
(right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) (left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) inf_le_right inf_le_right _
(hf.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) _ _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioo' intermediate_value_Ioo'
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_Icc {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : SurjOn f s (Icc (f a) (f b)) :=
hs.isPreconnected.intermediate_value ha hb hf
#align continuous_on.surj_on_Icc ContinuousOn.surjOn_Icc
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/IntermediateValue.lean | 612 | 615 | theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_uIcc {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
SurjOn f s (uIcc (f a) (f b)) := by |
rcases le_total (f a) (f b) with hab | hab <;> simp [hf.surjOn_Icc, *]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
#align_import topology.category.Top.limits.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
-- Porting note: every ML3 decl has an uppercase letter
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
abbrev pullbackFst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ X :=
⟨Prod.fst ∘ Subtype.val, by
apply Continuous.comp <;> set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in continuity⟩
#align Top.pullback_fst TopCat.pullbackFst
lemma pullbackFst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackFst f g x = x.1.1 := rfl
abbrev pullbackSnd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ Y :=
⟨Prod.snd ∘ Subtype.val, by
apply Continuous.comp <;> set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in continuity⟩
#align Top.pullback_snd TopCat.pullbackSnd
lemma pullbackSnd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackSnd f g x = x.1.2 := rfl
def pullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackFst f g) (pullbackSnd f g)
(by
dsimp [pullbackFst, pullbackSnd, Function.comp_def]
ext ⟨x, h⟩
-- Next 2 lines were
-- `rw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk, comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]`
-- `exact h` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply]
congr!)
#align Top.pullback_cone TopCat.pullbackCone
def pullbackConeIsLimit (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : IsLimit (pullbackCone f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _
(by
intro S
constructor; swap
· exact
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨S.fst x, S.snd x⟩, by simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom S.condition x⟩
continuous_toFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk <| Continuous.prod_mk ?_ ?_
· exact (PullbackCone.fst S)|>.continuous_toFun
· exact (PullbackCone.snd S)|>.continuous_toFun
}
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
· intro m h₁ h₂
-- Porting note: used to be ext x
apply ContinuousMap.ext; intro x
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₂ x)
#align Top.pullback_cone_is_limit TopCat.pullbackConeIsLimit
def pullbackIsoProdSubtype (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
pullback f g ≅ TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackConeIsLimit f g)
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullbackFst f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_fst TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).fst :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst f g) x
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_fst_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = pullbackSnd f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_snd TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
(pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).snd :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd f g) x
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_snd_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackFst f g = pullback.fst := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_fst TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackSnd f g = pullback.snd := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_snd TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd
-- Porting note: why do I need to tell Lean to coerce pullback to a type
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(x : ConcreteCategory.forget.obj (pullback f g)) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom x =
⟨⟨(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) x, (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) x⟩, by
simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition x⟩ := by
apply Subtype.ext; apply Prod.ext
exacts [ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst f g) x,
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd f g) x]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply
theorem pullback_topology {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullback f g).str =
induced (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) X.str ⊓
induced (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g)
refine homeo.inducing.induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (induced _ ( (induced Prod.fst X.str) ⊓ (induced Prod.snd Y.str))) = _
simp only [induced_compose, induced_inf]
congr
#align Top.pullback_topology TopCat.pullback_topology
theorem range_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) =
{ x | (Limits.prod.fst ≫ f) x = (Limits.prod.snd ≫ g) x } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
change (_ ≫ _ ≫ f) _ = (_ ≫ _ ≫ g) _ -- new `change` after #13170
simp [pullback.condition]
· rintro (h : f (_, _).1 = g (_, _).2)
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h⟩
change (forget TopCat).map _ _ = _ -- new `change` after #13170
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, limit.lift_π] <;> -- now `erw` after #13170
-- This used to be `simp` before leanprover/lean4#2644
aesop_cat
#align Top.range_pullback_to_prod TopCat.range_pullback_to_prod
noncomputable
def pullbackHomeoPreimage
{X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
(f : X → Z) (hf : Continuous f) (g : Y → Z) (hg : Embedding g) :
{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ≃ₜ f ⁻¹' Set.range g where
toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x.1.1, _, x.2.symm⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x.1, Exists.choose x.2⟩, (Exists.choose_spec x.2).symm⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext <;> dsimp
apply hg.inj
convert x.prop
exact Exists.choose_spec (p := fun y ↦ g y = f (↑x : X × Y).1) _
right_inv := fun x ↦ rfl
continuous_toFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
exact continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
refine continuous_prod_mk.mpr ⟨continuous_subtype_val, hg.toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr ?_⟩
convert hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
ext x
exact Exists.choose_spec x.2
theorem inducing_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Inducing <| ⇑(prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) :=
⟨by simp [topologicalSpace_coe, prod_topology, pullback_topology, induced_compose, ← coe_comp]⟩
#align Top.inducing_pullback_to_prod TopCat.inducing_pullback_to_prod
theorem embedding_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Embedding <| ⇑(prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) :=
⟨inducing_pullback_to_prod f g, (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
#align Top.embedding_pullback_to_prod TopCat.embedding_pullback_to_prod
theorem range_pullback_map {W X Y Z S T : TopCat} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Set.range (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) =
(pullback.fst : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range i₁ ∩
(pullback.snd : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range i₂ := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range]
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, comp_apply]
exact ⟨exists_apply_eq_apply _ _, exists_apply_eq_apply _ _⟩
rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
have : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂ := by
apply (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp H₃
erw [← comp_apply, eq₁, ← comp_apply, eq₂, -- now `erw` after #13170
comp_apply, comp_apply, hx₁, hx₂, ← comp_apply, pullback.condition]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f₁ f₂).inv ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, this⟩
change (forget TopCat).map _ _ = _
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;>
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
simp only [Category.assoc, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one]
· simp only [cospan_one, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [pullbackFst_apply, hx₁]
rw [← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl, comp_apply (g := g₁)]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
· simp only [cospan_left, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [hx₁] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
· simp only [cospan_right, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [hx₂] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
#align Top.range_pullback_map TopCat.range_pullback_map
theorem pullback_fst_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) = { x : X | ∃ y : Y, f x = g y } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨(y : (forget TopCat).obj _), rfl⟩
use (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) y
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition y
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
#align Top.pullback_fst_range TopCat.pullback_fst_range
theorem pullback_snd_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) = { y : Y | ∃ x : X, f x = g y } := by
ext y
constructor
· rintro ⟨(x : (forget TopCat).obj _), rfl⟩
use (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) x
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition x
· rintro ⟨x, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply]
#align Top.pullback_snd_range TopCat.pullback_snd_range
theorem pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings {W X Y Z S T : TopCat.{u}} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S)
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) {i₁ : W ⟶ Y} {i₂ : X ⟶ Z} (H₁ : Embedding i₁) (H₂ : Embedding i₂)
(i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Embedding (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine
embedding_of_embedding_compose (ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
(show Continuous (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ Y ⨯ Z) from
ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun _)
?_
suffices
Embedding (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd ≫ Limits.prod.map i₁ i₂ : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _) by
simpa [← coe_comp] using this
rw [coe_comp]
exact Embedding.comp (embedding_prod_map H₁ H₂) (embedding_pullback_to_prod _ _)
#align Top.pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings TopCat.pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings
theorem pullback_map_openEmbedding_of_open_embeddings {W X Y Z S T : TopCat.{u}} (f₁ : W ⟶ S)
(f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) {i₁ : W ⟶ Y} {i₂ : X ⟶ Z} (H₁ : OpenEmbedding i₁)
(H₂ : OpenEmbedding i₂) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) : OpenEmbedding (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
constructor
· apply
pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ H₁.toEmbedding H₂.toEmbedding i₃ eq₁ eq₂
· rw [range_pullback_map]
apply IsOpen.inter <;> apply Continuous.isOpen_preimage
· apply ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun
· exact H₁.isOpen_range
· apply ContinuousMap.continuous_toFun
· exact H₂.isOpen_range
#align Top.pullback_map_open_embedding_of_open_embeddings TopCat.pullback_map_openEmbedding_of_open_embeddings
theorem snd_embedding_of_left_embedding {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} (H : Embedding f) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Embedding <| ⇑(pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.snd : pullback (𝟙 S) g ⟶ _))).embedding.comp
(pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings (i₂ := 𝟙 Y)
f g (𝟙 S) g H (homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).embedding (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
erw [← coe_comp]
simp
#align Top.snd_embedding_of_left_embedding TopCat.snd_embedding_of_left_embedding
theorem fst_embedding_of_right_embedding {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) {g : Y ⟶ S}
(H : Embedding g) : Embedding <| ⇑(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.fst : pullback f (𝟙 S) ⟶ _))).embedding.comp
(pullback_map_embedding_of_embeddings (i₁ := 𝟙 X)
f g f (𝟙 _) (homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).embedding H (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
erw [← coe_comp]
simp
#align Top.fst_embedding_of_right_embedding TopCat.fst_embedding_of_right_embedding
theorem embedding_of_pullback_embeddings {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} {g : Y ⟶ S} (H₁ : Embedding f)
(H₂ : Embedding g) : Embedding (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by
convert H₂.comp (snd_embedding_of_left_embedding H₁ g)
erw [← coe_comp]
rw [← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inr]
rfl
#align Top.embedding_of_pullback_embeddings TopCat.embedding_of_pullback_embeddings
theorem snd_openEmbedding_of_left_openEmbedding {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} (H : OpenEmbedding f)
(g : Y ⟶ S) : OpenEmbedding <| ⇑(pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.snd : pullback (𝟙 S) g ⟶ _))).openEmbedding.comp
(pullback_map_openEmbedding_of_open_embeddings (i₂ := 𝟙 Y) f g (𝟙 _) g H
(homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).openEmbedding (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
erw [← coe_comp]
simp
#align Top.snd_open_embedding_of_left_open_embedding TopCat.snd_openEmbedding_of_left_openEmbedding
theorem fst_openEmbedding_of_right_openEmbedding {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) {g : Y ⟶ S}
(H : OpenEmbedding g) : OpenEmbedding <| ⇑(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) := by
convert (homeoOfIso (asIso (pullback.fst : pullback f (𝟙 S) ⟶ _))).openEmbedding.comp
(pullback_map_openEmbedding_of_open_embeddings (i₁ := 𝟙 X) f g f (𝟙 _)
(homeoOfIso (Iso.refl _)).openEmbedding H (𝟙 _) rfl (by simp))
erw [← coe_comp]
simp
#align Top.fst_open_embedding_of_right_open_embedding TopCat.fst_openEmbedding_of_right_openEmbedding
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Pullbacks.lean | 368 | 374 | theorem openEmbedding_of_pullback_open_embeddings {X Y S : TopCat} {f : X ⟶ S} {g : Y ⟶ S}
(H₁ : OpenEmbedding f) (H₂ : OpenEmbedding g) :
OpenEmbedding (limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.one) := by |
convert H₂.comp (snd_openEmbedding_of_left_openEmbedding H₁ g)
erw [← coe_comp]
rw [← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inr]
rfl
|
import Batteries.Data.Char
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.String.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Misc
import Batteries.Tactic.SeqFocus
namespace String
attribute [ext] ext
theorem lt_trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : String} : s₁ < s₂ → s₂ < s₃ → s₁ < s₃ :=
List.lt_trans' (α := Char) Nat.lt_trans
(fun h1 h2 => Nat.not_lt.2 <| Nat.le_trans (Nat.not_lt.1 h2) (Nat.not_lt.1 h1))
theorem lt_antisymm {s₁ s₂ : String} (h₁ : ¬s₁ < s₂) (h₂ : ¬s₂ < s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext <| List.lt_antisymm' (α := Char)
(fun h1 h2 => Char.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 h2) (Nat.not_lt.1 h1)) h₁ h₂
instance : Batteries.TransOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq
String.lt_irrefl String.lt_trans String.lt_antisymm
instance : Batteries.LTOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq
String.lt_irrefl String.lt_trans String.lt_antisymm
instance : Batteries.BEqOrd String := .compareOfLessAndEq String.lt_irrefl
@[simp] theorem mk_length (s : List Char) : (String.mk s).length = s.length := rfl
attribute [simp] toList -- prefer `String.data` over `String.toList` in lemmas
private theorem add_csize_pos : 0 < i + csize c :=
Nat.add_pos_right _ (csize_pos c)
private theorem ne_add_csize_add_self : i ≠ n + csize c + i :=
Nat.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left add_csize_pos)
private theorem ne_self_add_add_csize : i ≠ i + (n + csize c) :=
Nat.ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right add_csize_pos)
@[inline] def utf8Len : List Char → Nat := utf8ByteSize.go
@[simp] theorem utf8ByteSize.go_eq : utf8ByteSize.go = utf8Len := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8ByteSize_mk (cs) : utf8ByteSize ⟨cs⟩ = utf8Len cs := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_nil : utf8Len [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_cons (c cs) : utf8Len (c :: cs) = utf8Len cs + csize c := rfl
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_append (cs₁ cs₂) : utf8Len (cs₁ ++ cs₂) = utf8Len cs₁ + utf8Len cs₂ := by
induction cs₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.add_right_comm]
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_reverseAux (cs₁ cs₂) :
utf8Len (cs₁.reverseAux cs₂) = utf8Len cs₁ + utf8Len cs₂ := by
induction cs₁ generalizing cs₂ <;> simp [*, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm]
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_reverse (cs) : utf8Len cs.reverse = utf8Len cs := utf8Len_reverseAux ..
@[simp] theorem utf8Len_eq_zero : utf8Len l = 0 ↔ l = [] := by
cases l <;> simp [Nat.ne_of_gt add_csize_pos]
section
open List
theorem utf8Len_le_of_sublist : ∀ {cs₁ cs₂}, cs₁ <+ cs₂ → utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂
| _, _, .slnil => Nat.le_refl _
| _, _, .cons _ h => Nat.le_trans (utf8Len_le_of_sublist h) (Nat.le_add_right ..)
| _, _, .cons₂ _ h => Nat.add_le_add_right (utf8Len_le_of_sublist h) _
theorem utf8Len_le_of_infix (h : cs₁ <:+: cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
theorem utf8Len_le_of_suffix (h : cs₁ <:+ cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
theorem utf8Len_le_of_prefix (h : cs₁ <+: cs₂) : utf8Len cs₁ ≤ utf8Len cs₂ :=
utf8Len_le_of_sublist h.sublist
end
@[simp] theorem endPos_eq (cs : List Char) : endPos ⟨cs⟩ = ⟨utf8Len cs⟩ := rfl
theorem endPos_eq_zero : ∀ (s : String), endPos s = 0 ↔ s = ""
| ⟨_⟩ => Pos.ext_iff.trans <| utf8Len_eq_zero.trans ext_iff.symm
theorem isEmpty_iff (s : String) : isEmpty s ↔ s = "" :=
(beq_iff_eq ..).trans (endPos_eq_zero _)
def utf8InductionOn {motive : List Char → Pos → Sort u}
(s : List Char) (i p : Pos)
(nil : ∀ i, motive [] i)
(eq : ∀ c cs, motive (c :: cs) p)
(ind : ∀ (c : Char) cs i, i ≠ p → motive cs (i + c) → motive (c :: cs) i) :
motive s i :=
match s with
| [] => nil i
| c::cs =>
if h : i = p then
h ▸ eq c cs
else ind c cs i h (utf8InductionOn cs (i + c) p nil eq ind)
theorem utf8GetAux_add_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i p n : Nat) :
utf8GetAux s ⟨i + n⟩ ⟨p + n⟩ = utf8GetAux s ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ := by
apply utf8InductionOn s ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ (motive := fun s i =>
utf8GetAux s ⟨i.byteIdx + n⟩ ⟨p + n⟩ = utf8GetAux s i ⟨p⟩) <;>
simp [utf8GetAux]
intro c cs ⟨i⟩ h ih
simp [Pos.ext_iff, Pos.addChar_eq] at h ⊢
simp [Nat.add_right_cancel_iff, h]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm]
exact ih
theorem utf8GetAux_addChar_right_cancel (s : List Char) (i p : Pos) (c : Char) :
utf8GetAux s (i + c) (p + c) = utf8GetAux s i p := utf8GetAux_add_right_cancel ..
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/String/Lemmas.lean | 148 | 157 | theorem utf8GetAux_of_valid (cs cs' : List Char) {i p : Nat} (hp : i + utf8Len cs = p) :
utf8GetAux (cs ++ cs') ⟨i⟩ ⟨p⟩ = cs'.headD default := by |
match cs, cs' with
| [], [] => rfl
| [], c::cs' => simp [← hp, utf8GetAux]
| c::cs, cs' =>
simp [utf8GetAux, -List.headD_eq_head?]; rw [if_neg]
case hnc => simp [← hp, Pos.ext_iff]; exact ne_self_add_add_csize
refine utf8GetAux_of_valid cs cs' ?_
simpa [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm] using hp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Bounds
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic -- Porting note: `LinearOrderedField`, etc
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
#align_import algebra.order.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
open Function Set
open Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note: Swapped the place of `CompleteLattice` and `ConditionallyCompleteLattice`
-- due to simpNF problem between `sSup_xx` `csSup_xx`.
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
section Group
variable [Group α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)]
(s t : Set α)
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Pointwise.lean | 61 | 63 | theorem sSup_inv (s : Set α) : sSup s⁻¹ = (sInf s)⁻¹ := by |
rw [← image_inv, sSup_image]
exact ((OrderIso.inv α).map_sInf _).symm
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
#align_import algebra.module.zlattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3e83f0fa4391c8740f7d773a7a9b74e311ae2a3"
noncomputable section
namespace Zspan
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSet Submodule Bornology
variable {E ι : Type*}
section NormedLatticeField
variable {K : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField K]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
variable (b : Basis ι K E)
theorem span_top : span K (span ℤ (Set.range b) : Set E) = ⊤ := by simp [span_span_of_tower]
def fundamentalDomain : Set E := {m | ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1}
#align zspan.fundamental_domain Zspan.fundamentalDomain
@[simp]
theorem mem_fundamentalDomain {m : E} :
m ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1 := Iff.rfl
#align zspan.mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.mem_fundamentalDomain
theorem map_fundamentalDomain {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace K F] (f : E ≃ₗ[K] F) :
f '' (fundamentalDomain b) = fundamentalDomain (b.map f) := by
ext x
rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.map_repr, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, ← mem_fundamentalDomain,
show f.symm x = f.toEquiv.symm x by rfl, ← Set.mem_image_equiv]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fundamentalDomain_reindex {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
fundamentalDomain (b.reindex e) = fundamentalDomain b := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.repr_reindex_apply]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr' e]
simp_rw [implies_true]
lemma fundamentalDomain_pi_basisFun [Fintype ι] :
fundamentalDomain (Pi.basisFun ℝ ι) = Set.pi Set.univ fun _ : ι ↦ Set.Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
ext; simp
variable [FloorRing K]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι]
def floor (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌊b.repr m i⌋ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.floor Zspan.floor
def ceil (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌈b.repr m i⌉ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.ceil Zspan.ceil
@[simp]
theorem repr_floor_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (floor b m) i = ⌊b.repr m i⌋ := by
classical simp only [floor, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_floor_apply Zspan.repr_floor_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_ceil_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (ceil b m) i = ⌈b.repr m i⌉ := by
classical simp only [ceil, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_ceil_apply Zspan.repr_ceil_apply
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (floor b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_floor_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.floor_intCast z)
#align zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (ceil b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_ceil_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.ceil_intCast z)
#align zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem
def fract (m : E) : E := m - floor b m
#align zspan.fract Zspan.fract
theorem fract_apply (m : E) : fract b m = m - floor b m := rfl
#align zspan.fract_apply Zspan.fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_fract_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (fract b m) i = Int.fract (b.repr m i) := by
rw [fract, map_sub, Finsupp.coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply, repr_floor_apply, Int.fract]
#align zspan.repr_fract_apply Zspan.repr_fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (m : E) : fract b (fract b m) = fract b m :=
Basis.ext_elem b fun _ => by classical simp only [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_fract]
#align zspan.fract_fract Zspan.fract_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_zspan_add (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (v + m) = fract b m := by
classical
refine (Basis.ext_elem_iff b).mpr fun i => ?_
simp_rw [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_fract]
use (b.restrictScalars ℤ).repr ⟨v, h⟩ i
rw [map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_tsub_cancel_right,
← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ K) _, Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply, coe_mk]
#align zspan.fract_zspan_add Zspan.fract_zspan_add
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Zlattice/Basic.lean | 166 | 167 | theorem fract_add_zspan (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (m + v) = fract b m := by | rw [add_comm, fract_zspan_add b m h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.MulOpposite
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Basic
#align_import group_theory.subgroup.mul_opposite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f93c11933efbc3c2f0299e47b8ff83e9b539cbf6"
variable {ι : Sort*} {G : Type*} [Group G]
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Pull an additive subgroup back to an opposite additive subgroup along `AddOpposite.unop`"]
protected def op (H : Subgroup G) : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ where
carrier := MulOpposite.unop ⁻¹' (H : Set G)
one_mem' := H.one_mem
mul_mem' ha hb := H.mul_mem hb ha
inv_mem' := H.inv_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_op {x : Gᵐᵒᵖ} {S : Subgroup G} : x ∈ S.op ↔ x.unop ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma op_toSubmonoid (H : Subgroup G) :
H.op.toSubmonoid = H.toSubmonoid.op :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simps)
"Pull an opposite additive subgroup back to an additive subgroup along `AddOpposite.op`"]
protected def unop (H : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : Subgroup G where
carrier := MulOpposite.op ⁻¹' (H : Set Gᵐᵒᵖ)
one_mem' := H.one_mem
mul_mem' := fun ha hb => H.mul_mem hb ha
inv_mem' := H.inv_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_unop {x : G} {S : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : x ∈ S.unop ↔ MulOpposite.op x ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma unop_toSubmonoid (H : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) :
H.unop.toSubmonoid = H.toSubmonoid.unop :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_op (S : Subgroup G) : S.op.unop = S := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_unop (S : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : S.unop.op = S := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem op_le_iff {S₁ : Subgroup G} {S₂ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : S₁.op ≤ S₂ ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂.unop :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[to_additive]
theorem le_op_iff {S₁ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} {S₂ : Subgroup G} : S₁ ≤ S₂.op ↔ S₁.unop ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_le_op_iff {S₁ S₂ : Subgroup G} : S₁.op ≤ S₂.op ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.op_surjective.forall
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_le_unop_iff {S₁ S₂ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ} : S₁.unop ≤ S₂.unop ↔ S₁ ≤ S₂ :=
MulOpposite.unop_surjective.forall
@[to_additive (attr := simps) "An additive subgroup `H` of `G` determines an additive subgroup
`H.op` of the opposite additive group `Gᵃᵒᵖ`."]
def opEquiv : Subgroup G ≃o Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ where
toFun := Subgroup.op
invFun := Subgroup.unop
left_inv := unop_op
right_inv := op_unop
map_rel_iff' := op_le_op_iff
#align subgroup.opposite Subgroup.opEquiv
#align add_subgroup.opposite AddSubgroup.opEquiv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).op = ⊥ := opEquiv.map_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ).unop = ⊥ := opEquiv.symm.map_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem op_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).op = ⊤ := opEquiv.map_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem unop_top : (⊤ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ).unop = ⊤ := opEquiv.symm.map_top
@[to_additive]
theorem op_sup (S₁ S₂ : Subgroup G) : (S₁ ⊔ S₂).op = S₁.op ⊔ S₂.op :=
opEquiv.map_sup _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_sup (S₁ S₂ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : (S₁ ⊔ S₂).unop = S₁.unop ⊔ S₂.unop :=
opEquiv.symm.map_sup _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem op_inf (S₁ S₂ : Subgroup G) : (S₁ ⊓ S₂).op = S₁.op ⊓ S₂.op := opEquiv.map_inf _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_inf (S₁ S₂ : Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : (S₁ ⊓ S₂).unop = S₁.unop ⊓ S₂.unop :=
opEquiv.symm.map_inf _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem op_sSup (S : Set (Subgroup G)) : (sSup S).op = sSup (.unop ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.map_sSup_eq_sSup_symm_preimage _
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_sSup (S : Set (Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ)) : (sSup S).unop = sSup (.op ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.symm.map_sSup_eq_sSup_symm_preimage _
@[to_additive]
theorem op_sInf (S : Set (Subgroup G)) : (sInf S).op = sInf (.unop ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.map_sInf_eq_sInf_symm_preimage _
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_sInf (S : Set (Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ)) : (sInf S).unop = sInf (.op ⁻¹' S) :=
opEquiv.symm.map_sInf_eq_sInf_symm_preimage _
@[to_additive]
theorem op_iSup (S : ι → Subgroup G) : (iSup S).op = ⨆ i, (S i).op := opEquiv.map_iSup _
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_iSup (S : ι → Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : (iSup S).unop = ⨆ i, (S i).unop :=
opEquiv.symm.map_iSup _
@[to_additive]
theorem op_iInf (S : ι → Subgroup G) : (iInf S).op = ⨅ i, (S i).op := opEquiv.map_iInf _
@[to_additive]
theorem unop_iInf (S : ι → Subgroup Gᵐᵒᵖ) : (iInf S).unop = ⨅ i, (S i).unop :=
opEquiv.symm.map_iInf _
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/MulOpposite.lean | 151 | 154 | theorem op_closure (s : Set G) : (closure s).op = closure (MulOpposite.unop ⁻¹' s) := by |
simp_rw [closure, op_sInf, Set.preimage_setOf_eq, Subgroup.unop_coe]
congr with a
exact MulOpposite.unop_surjective.forall
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ico_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ioc_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIocMod
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
#align real.angle.to_real Real.Angle.toReal
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe Real.Angle.toReal_coe
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
#align real.angle.to_real_injective Real.Angle.toReal_injective
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
#align real.angle.to_real_inj Real.Angle.toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
#align real.angle.coe_to_real Real.Angle.coe_toReal
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
#align real.angle.neg_pi_lt_to_real Real.Angle.neg_pi_lt_toReal
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
#align real.angle.to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.toReal_le_pi
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.abs_toReal_le_pi
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
#align real.angle.to_Ioc_mod_to_real Real.Angle.toIocMod_toReal
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_zero Real.Angle.toReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_pi Real.Angle.toReal_pi
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_iff
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_neg_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff' h',
le_div_iff' h']
#align real.angle.nsmul_to_real_eq_mul Real.Angle.nsmul_toReal_eq_mul
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;>
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
#align real.angle.sin_to_real Real.Angle.sin_toReal
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
#align real.angle.cos_to_real Real.Angle.cos_toReal
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
#align real.angle.cos_nonneg_iff_abs_to_real_le_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.cos_pos_iff_abs_to_real_lt_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_to_real Real.Angle.cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
#align real.angle.tan Real.Angle.tan
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.tan_eq_sin_div_cos Real.Angle.tan_eq_sin_div_cos
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
#align real.angle.tan_coe Real.Angle.tan_coe
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
#align real.angle.tan_zero Real.Angle.tan_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can now prove it
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
#align real.angle.tan_coe_pi Real.Angle.tan_coe_pi
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
#align real.angle.tan_periodic Real.Angle.tan_periodic
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
#align real.angle.tan_add_pi Real.Angle.tan_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.tan_sub_pi Real.Angle.tan_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
#align real.angle.tan_to_real Real.Angle.tan_toReal
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
#align real.angle.tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
#align real.angle.tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi Real.Angle.tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
#align real.angle.tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi Real.Angle.tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
#align real.angle.sign Real.Angle.sign
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
#align real.angle.sign_zero Real.Angle.sign_zero
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
#align real.angle.sign_coe_pi Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
#align real.angle.sign_neg Real.Angle.sign_neg
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
#align real.angle.sign_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sign_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sign_add_pi Real.Angle.sign_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
#align real.angle.sign_pi_add Real.Angle.sign_pi_add
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sign_sub_pi Real.Angle.sign_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
#align real.angle.sign_pi_sub Real.Angle.sign_pi_sub
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sign_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sign_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_neg_iff_sign_neg Real.Angle.toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
#align real.angle.to_real_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg Real.Angle.toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem sign_toReal {θ : Angle} (h : θ ≠ π) : SignType.sign θ.toReal = θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (ht | ht | ht)
· simp [ht, toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 ht]
· simp [sign, ht, ← sin_toReal]
· rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_pos ht,
sign_pos
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi ht ((toReal_le_pi θ).lt_of_ne (toReal_eq_pi_iff.not.2 h)))]
#align real.angle.sign_to_real Real.Angle.sign_toReal
theorem coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} (h : 0 ≤ θ.sign) : ↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [abs_eq_self.2 (toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg.2 h), coe_toReal]
#align real.angle.coe_abs_to_real_of_sign_nonneg Real.Angle.coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonneg
theorem neg_coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonpos {θ : Angle} (h : θ.sign ≤ 0) : -↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [SignType.nonpos_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h)
· rw [abs_of_neg (toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.2 h), coe_neg, neg_neg, coe_toReal]
· rw [sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [abs_of_pos Real.pi_pos]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_abs_to_real_of_sign_nonpos Real.Angle.neg_coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonpos
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 945 | 963 | theorem eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq {θ ψ : Angle} :
θ = ψ ↔ θ.sign = ψ.sign ∧ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by |
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩;
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h with ⟨hs, hr⟩
rw [abs_eq_abs] at hr
rcases hr with (hr | hr)
· exact toReal_injective hr
· by_cases h : θ = π
· rw [h, toReal_pi, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal ψ).ne hr)
· by_cases h' : ψ = π
· rw [h', toReal_pi] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal θ).ne hr.symm)
· rw [← sign_toReal h, ← sign_toReal h', hr, Left.sign_neg, SignType.neg_eq_self_iff,
_root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hs
rw [hs, toReal_zero, neg_zero, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hr
rw [hr, hs]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
#align ordnode.pos_size_of_mem Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem
theorem findMin'_dual : ∀ (t) (x : α), findMin' (dual t) x = findMax' x t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node _ _ x r, _ => findMin'_dual r x
#align ordnode.find_min'_dual Ordnode.findMin'_dual
theorem findMax'_dual (t) (x : α) : findMax' x (dual t) = findMin' t x := by
rw [← findMin'_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max'_dual Ordnode.findMax'_dual
theorem findMin_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, findMin (dual t) = findMax t
| nil => rfl
| node _ _ _ _ => congr_arg some <| findMin'_dual _ _
#align ordnode.find_min_dual Ordnode.findMin_dual
theorem findMax_dual (t : Ordnode α) : findMax (dual t) = findMin t := by
rw [← findMin_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max_dual Ordnode.findMax_dual
theorem dual_eraseMin : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (eraseMin t) = eraseMax (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ nil x r => rfl
| node _ (node sz l' y r') x r => by
rw [eraseMin, dual_balanceR, dual_eraseMin (node sz l' y r'), dual, dual, dual, eraseMax]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_min Ordnode.dual_eraseMin
theorem dual_eraseMax (t : Ordnode α) : dual (eraseMax t) = eraseMin (dual t) := by
rw [← dual_dual (eraseMin _), dual_eraseMin, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_max Ordnode.dual_eraseMax
theorem splitMin_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMin' l x r = (findMin' l x, eraseMin (node s l x r))
| _, nil, x, r => rfl
| _, node ls ll lx lr, x, r => by rw [splitMin', splitMin_eq ls ll lx lr, findMin', eraseMin]
#align ordnode.split_min_eq Ordnode.splitMin_eq
theorem splitMax_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMax' l x r = (eraseMax (node s l x r), findMax' x r)
| _, l, x, nil => rfl
| _, l, x, node ls ll lx lr => by rw [splitMax', splitMax_eq ls ll lx lr, findMax', eraseMax]
#align ordnode.split_max_eq Ordnode.splitMax_eq
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMin'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (t) (x : α), All P t → P x → P (findMin' t x)
| nil, _x, _, hx => hx
| node _ ll lx _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂, _⟩, _ => findMin'_all ll lx h₁ h₂
#align ordnode.find_min'_all Ordnode.findMin'_all
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMax'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) (t), P x → All P t → P (findMax' x t)
| _x, nil, hx, _ => hx
| _, node _ _ lx lr, _, ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩ => findMax'_all lx lr h₂ h₃
#align ordnode.find_max'_all Ordnode.findMax'_all
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_left (t : Ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_left Ordnode.merge_nil_left
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_right (t : Ordnode α) : merge nil t = t :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_right Ordnode.merge_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then balanceL (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then balanceR ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_node Ordnode.merge_node
theorem dual_insert [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (Ordnode.insert x t) = @Ordnode.insert αᵒᵈ _ _ x (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
have : @cmpLE αᵒᵈ _ _ x y = cmpLE y x := rfl
rw [Ordnode.insert, dual, Ordnode.insert, this, ← cmpLE_swap x y]
cases cmpLE x y <;>
simp [Ordering.swap, Ordnode.insert, dual_balanceL, dual_balanceR, dual_insert]
#align ordnode.dual_insert Ordnode.dual_insert
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r) : @balance α l x r = balance' l x r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· rw [sr.eq_node'] at hr ⊢
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr <;> cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotateL]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node']; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.2.1.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos))
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rw [sl.eq_node'] at hl ⊢
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node']; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.2.2.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· apply Nat.not_lt_zero
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos))
· simp [balance, balance']
symm; rw [if_neg]
· split_ifs with h h_1
· have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h
rwa [sr.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr
· rw [size, zero_add] at rd
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr
· exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateL]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node', sr.1]; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1]; abel
· have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1
rwa [sl.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr
· rw [size, zero_add] at ld
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr
· exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateR]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node', sl.1]; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1]; abel
· simp [node']
· exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sl.pos) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sr.pos))
#align ordnode.balance_eq_balance' Ordnode.balance_eq_balance'
theorem balanceL_eq_balance {l x r} (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r) (H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balanceL α l x r = balance l x r := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0 := by
have := H1 rfl
rwa [size, sr.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
rw [sr.eq_node']; rfl
· replace H2 : ¬rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos)
simp [balanceL, balance, H2]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance
def Raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n ∨ m = n + 1
#align ordnode.raised Ordnode.Raised
theorem raised_iff {n m} : Raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 := by
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, Nat.le_succ _⟩
· exact ⟨Nat.le_succ _, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁)
#align ordnode.raised_iff Ordnode.raised_iff
theorem Raised.dist_le {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist n m ≤ 1 := by
cases' raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2; rwa [Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, tsub_le_iff_left]
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le Ordnode.Raised.dist_le
theorem Raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist m n ≤ 1 := by
rw [Nat.dist_comm]; exact H.dist_le
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le' Ordnode.Raised.dist_le'
theorem Raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (k + n) (k + m) := by
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.add_left Ordnode.Raised.add_left
theorem Raised.add_right (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (n + k) (m + k) := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm m]; exact H.add_left _
#align ordnode.raised.add_right Ordnode.Raised.add_right
theorem Raised.right {l x₁ x₂ r₁ r₂} (H : Raised (size r₁) (size r₂)) :
Raised (size (@node' α l x₁ r₁)) (size (@node' α l x₂ r₂)) := by
rw [node', size_node, size_node]; generalize size r₂ = m at H ⊢
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.right Ordnode.Raised.right
theorem balanceL_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceL α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← balance_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr, balanceL_eq_balance sl sr]
· intro l0; rw [l0] at H
rcases H with (⟨_, ⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm
exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 (balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm)
· intro l1 _
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩ | ⟨r', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) H) (mul_pos (by decide) l1 : (0 : ℕ) < _)
· exact le_trans H₂ (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (raised_iff.1 e).1)
· cases raised_iff.1 e; unfold delta; omega
· exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 H₂
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance'
theorem balance_sz_dual {l r}
(H : (∃ l', Raised (@size α l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (@size α r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size (dual r)) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size (dual l))) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size (dual l)) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size (dual r)) r' := by
rw [size_dual, size_dual]
exact
H.symm.imp (Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
(Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
#align ordnode.balance_sz_dual Ordnode.balance_sz_dual
theorem size_balanceL {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_l Ordnode.size_balanceL
theorem all_balanceL {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceL α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_l Ordnode.all_balanceL
theorem balanceR_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceR α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceR l x r), dual_balanceR,
balanceL_eq_balance' hr.dual hl.dual sr.dual sl.dual (balance_sz_dual H), ← dual_balance',
dual_dual]
#align ordnode.balance_r_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceR_eq_balance'
theorem size_balanceR {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_r Ordnode.size_balanceR
theorem all_balanceR {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceR α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_r Ordnode.all_balanceR
section
variable [Preorder α]
def Bounded : Ordnode α → WithBot α → WithTop α → Prop
| nil, some a, some b => a < b
| nil, _, _ => True
| node _ l x r, o₁, o₂ => Bounded l o₁ x ∧ Bounded r (↑x) o₂
#align ordnode.bounded Ordnode.Bounded
theorem Bounded.dual :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → @Bounded αᵒᵈ _ (dual t) o₂ o₁
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨Or.dual, ol.dual⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.dual Ordnode.Bounded.dual
theorem Bounded.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} :
Bounded t o₁ o₂ ↔ @Bounded αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) o₂ o₁ :=
⟨Bounded.dual, fun h => by
have := Bounded.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.dual_iff Ordnode.Bounded.dual_iff
theorem Bounded.weak_left : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded t ⊥ o₂
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₂ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨ol.weak_left, Or⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.weak_left Ordnode.Bounded.weak_left
theorem Bounded.weak_right : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded t o₁ ⊤
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₁ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨ol, Or.weak_right⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.weak_right Ordnode.Bounded.weak_right
theorem Bounded.weak {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t o₁ o₂) : Bounded t ⊥ ⊤ :=
h.weak_left.weak_right
#align ordnode.bounded.weak Ordnode.Bounded.weak
theorem Bounded.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o}, Bounded t y o → Bounded t x o
| nil, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| nil, some _, h => lt_of_le_of_lt xy h
| node _ _ _ _, _o, ⟨ol, or⟩ => ⟨ol.mono_left xy, or⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mono_left Ordnode.Bounded.mono_left
theorem Bounded.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o}, Bounded t o x → Bounded t o y
| nil, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| nil, some _, h => lt_of_lt_of_le h xy
| node _ _ _ _, _o, ⟨ol, or⟩ => ⟨ol, or.mono_right xy⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mono_right Ordnode.Bounded.mono_right
theorem Bounded.to_lt : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {x y : α}, Bounded t x y → x < y
| nil, _, _, h => h
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => lt_trans h₁.to_lt h₂.to_lt
#align ordnode.bounded.to_lt Ordnode.Bounded.to_lt
theorem Bounded.to_nil {t : Ordnode α} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil o₁ o₂
| none, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| some _, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| some _, some _, h => h.to_lt
#align ordnode.bounded.to_nil Ordnode.Bounded.to_nil
theorem Bounded.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t₁ o₁ x → Bounded t₂ x o₂ → Bounded t₂ o₁ o₂
| none, _, _, h₂ => h₂.weak_left
| some _, _, h₁, h₂ => h₂.mono_left (le_of_lt h₁.to_lt)
#align ordnode.bounded.trans_left Ordnode.Bounded.trans_left
theorem Bounded.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t₁ o₁ x → Bounded t₂ x o₂ → Bounded t₁ o₁ o₂
| _, none, h₁, _ => h₁.weak_right
| _, some _, h₁, h₂ => h₁.mono_right (le_of_lt h₂.to_lt)
#align ordnode.bounded.trans_right Ordnode.Bounded.trans_right
theorem Bounded.mem_lt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, Bounded t o x → All (· < x) t
| nil, _, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.mem_lt.imp fun _ h => lt_trans h h₂.to_lt, h₂.to_lt, h₂.mem_lt⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mem_lt Ordnode.Bounded.mem_lt
theorem Bounded.mem_gt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, Bounded t x o → All (· > x) t
| nil, _, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁.mem_gt, h₁.to_lt, h₂.mem_gt.imp fun _ => lt_trans h₁.to_lt⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mem_gt Ordnode.Bounded.mem_gt
theorem Bounded.of_lt :
∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil o₁ x → All (· < x) t → Bounded t o₁ x
| nil, _, _, _, _, hn, _ => hn
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, _, ⟨_, al₂, al₃⟩ => ⟨h₁, h₂.of_lt al₂ al₃⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.of_lt Ordnode.Bounded.of_lt
theorem Bounded.of_gt :
∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil x o₂ → All (· > x) t → Bounded t x o₂
| nil, _, _, _, _, hn, _ => hn
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, _, ⟨al₁, al₂, _⟩ => ⟨h₁.of_gt al₂ al₁, h₂⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.of_gt Ordnode.Bounded.of_gt
theorem Bounded.to_sep {t₁ t₂ o₁ o₂} {x : α}
(h₁ : Bounded t₁ o₁ (x : WithTop α)) (h₂ : Bounded t₂ (x : WithBot α) o₂) :
t₁.All fun y => t₂.All fun z : α => y < z := by
refine h₁.mem_lt.imp fun y yx => ?_
exact h₂.mem_gt.imp fun z xz => lt_trans yx xz
#align ordnode.bounded.to_sep Ordnode.Bounded.to_sep
end
section
variable [Preorder α]
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
#align ordnode.valid' Ordnode.Valid'
#align ordnode.valid'.ord Ordnode.Valid'.ord
#align ordnode.valid'.sz Ordnode.Valid'.sz
#align ordnode.valid'.bal Ordnode.Valid'.bal
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
#align ordnode.valid Ordnode.Valid
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.mono_left Ordnode.Valid'.mono_left
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.mono_right Ordnode.Valid'.mono_right
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.trans_left Ordnode.Valid'.trans_left
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.trans_right Ordnode.Valid'.trans_right
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.of_lt Ordnode.Valid'.of_lt
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.of_gt Ordnode.Valid'.of_gt
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.valid Ordnode.Valid'.valid
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'_nil Ordnode.valid'_nil
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
#align ordnode.valid_nil Ordnode.valid_nil
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.node Ordnode.Valid'.node
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, o₁, o₂, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l x r, o₁, o₂, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.dual Ordnode.Valid'.dual
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.dual_iff Ordnode.Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
#align ordnode.valid.dual Ordnode.Valid.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
#align ordnode.valid.dual_iff Ordnode.Valid.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.left Ordnode.Valid'.left
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.right Ordnode.Valid'.right
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
#align ordnode.valid.left Ordnode.Valid.left
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
#align ordnode.valid.right Ordnode.Valid.right
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
#align ordnode.valid.size_eq Ordnode.Valid.size_eq
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
#align ordnode.valid'.node' Ordnode.Valid'.node'
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
#align ordnode.valid'_singleton Ordnode.valid'_singleton
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
#align ordnode.valid_singleton Ordnode.valid_singleton
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
#align ordnode.valid'.node3_l Ordnode.Valid'.node3L
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
#align ordnode.valid'.node3_r Ordnode.Valid'.node3R
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₁ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₁
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₂ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₂
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₃ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₃
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₄ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₄
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₅ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₅
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
cases' m with s ml z mr; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l Ordnode.Valid'.node4L
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₁ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₂ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₃ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₄ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
erw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_r Ordnode.Valid'.rotateR
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 1,308 | 1,315 | theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by |
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Tree.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Core
import Mathlib.Util.SynthesizeUsing
import Mathlib.Util.Qq
open Lean Parser Tactic Mathlib Meta NormNum Qq
initialize registerTraceClass `CancelDenoms
namespace CancelDenoms
theorem mul_subst {α} [CommRing α] {n1 n2 k e1 e2 t1 t2 : α}
(h1 : n1 * e1 = t1) (h2 : n2 * e2 = t2) (h3 : n1 * n2 = k) : k * (e1 * e2) = t1 * t2 := by
rw [← h3, mul_comm n1, mul_assoc n2, ← mul_assoc n1, h1,
← mul_assoc n2, mul_comm n2, mul_assoc, h2]
#align cancel_factors.mul_subst CancelDenoms.mul_subst
theorem div_subst {α} [Field α] {n1 n2 k e1 e2 t1 : α}
(h1 : n1 * e1 = t1) (h2 : n2 / e2 = 1) (h3 : n1 * n2 = k) : k * (e1 / e2) = t1 := by
rw [← h3, mul_assoc, mul_div_left_comm, h2, ← mul_assoc, h1, mul_comm, one_mul]
#align cancel_factors.div_subst CancelDenoms.div_subst
theorem cancel_factors_eq_div {α} [Field α] {n e e' : α}
(h : n * e = e') (h2 : n ≠ 0) : e = e' / n :=
eq_div_of_mul_eq h2 <| by rwa [mul_comm] at h
#align cancel_factors.cancel_factors_eq_div CancelDenoms.cancel_factors_eq_div
theorem add_subst {α} [Ring α] {n e1 e2 t1 t2 : α} (h1 : n * e1 = t1) (h2 : n * e2 = t2) :
n * (e1 + e2) = t1 + t2 := by simp [left_distrib, *]
#align cancel_factors.add_subst CancelDenoms.add_subst
theorem sub_subst {α} [Ring α] {n e1 e2 t1 t2 : α} (h1 : n * e1 = t1) (h2 : n * e2 = t2) :
n * (e1 - e2) = t1 - t2 := by simp [left_distrib, *, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align cancel_factors.sub_subst CancelDenoms.sub_subst
theorem neg_subst {α} [Ring α] {n e t : α} (h1 : n * e = t) : n * -e = -t := by simp [*]
#align cancel_factors.neg_subst CancelDenoms.neg_subst
theorem pow_subst {α} [CommRing α] {n e1 t1 k l : α} {e2 : ℕ}
(h1 : n * e1 = t1) (h2 : l * n ^ e2 = k) : k * (e1 ^ e2) = l * t1 ^ e2 := by
rw [← h2, ← h1, mul_pow, mul_assoc]
theorem inv_subst {α} [Field α] {n k e : α} (h2 : e ≠ 0) (h3 : n * e = k) :
k * (e ⁻¹) = n := by rw [← div_eq_mul_inv, ← h3, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h2]
theorem cancel_factors_lt {α} [LinearOrderedField α] {a b ad bd a' b' gcd : α}
(ha : ad * a = a') (hb : bd * b = b') (had : 0 < ad) (hbd : 0 < bd) (hgcd : 0 < gcd) :
(a < b) = (1 / gcd * (bd * a') < 1 / gcd * (ad * b')) := by
rw [mul_lt_mul_left, ← ha, ← hb, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm bd, mul_lt_mul_left]
· exact mul_pos had hbd
· exact one_div_pos.2 hgcd
#align cancel_factors.cancel_factors_lt CancelDenoms.cancel_factors_lt
theorem cancel_factors_le {α} [LinearOrderedField α] {a b ad bd a' b' gcd : α}
(ha : ad * a = a') (hb : bd * b = b') (had : 0 < ad) (hbd : 0 < bd) (hgcd : 0 < gcd) :
(a ≤ b) = (1 / gcd * (bd * a') ≤ 1 / gcd * (ad * b')) := by
rw [mul_le_mul_left, ← ha, ← hb, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm bd, mul_le_mul_left]
· exact mul_pos had hbd
· exact one_div_pos.2 hgcd
#align cancel_factors.cancel_factors_le CancelDenoms.cancel_factors_le
| Mathlib/Tactic/CancelDenoms/Core.lean | 89 | 102 | theorem cancel_factors_eq {α} [Field α] {a b ad bd a' b' gcd : α} (ha : ad * a = a')
(hb : bd * b = b') (had : ad ≠ 0) (hbd : bd ≠ 0) (hgcd : gcd ≠ 0) :
(a = b) = (1 / gcd * (bd * a') = 1 / gcd * (ad * b')) := by |
rw [← ha, ← hb, ← mul_assoc bd, ← mul_assoc ad, mul_comm bd]
ext; constructor
· rintro rfl
rfl
· intro h
simp only [← mul_assoc] at h
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_ne_zero ?_ ?_) h
on_goal 1 => apply mul_ne_zero
on_goal 1 => apply div_ne_zero
· exact one_ne_zero
all_goals assumption
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.AddCharacter
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.ZModChar
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.gauss_sum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3f4be1fcb5376c4948d7f095bec45350bfb9d1a"
universe u v
open AddChar MulChar
section GaussSumDef
-- `R` is the domain of the characters
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [Fintype R]
-- `R'` is the target of the characters
variable {R' : Type v} [CommRing R']
def gaussSum (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') : R' :=
∑ a, χ a * ψ a
#align gauss_sum gaussSum
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/GaussSum.lean | 74 | 78 | theorem gaussSum_mulShift (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') (a : Rˣ) :
χ a * gaussSum χ (mulShift ψ a) = gaussSum χ ψ := by |
simp only [gaussSum, mulShift_apply, Finset.mul_sum]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc, ← map_mul]
exact Fintype.sum_bijective _ a.mulLeft_bijective _ _ fun x => rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
#align_import ring_theory.hahn_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a484a7d0eade4e1268f4fb402859b6686037f965"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
@[ext]
structure HahnSeries (Γ : Type*) (R : Type*) [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R] where
coeff : Γ → R
isPWO_support' : (Function.support coeff).IsPWO
#align hahn_series HahnSeries
variable {Γ : Type*} {R : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Zero
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : HahnSeries Γ R → Γ → R) :=
HahnSeries.ext
#align hahn_series.coeff_injective HahnSeries.coeff_injective
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj {x y : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = y.coeff ↔ x = y :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
#align hahn_series.coeff_inj HahnSeries.coeff_inj
nonrec def support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Set Γ :=
support x.coeff
#align hahn_series.support HahnSeries.support
@[simp]
theorem isPWO_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsPWO :=
x.isPWO_support'
#align hahn_series.is_pwo_support HahnSeries.isPWO_support
@[simp]
theorem isWF_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsWF :=
x.isPWO_support.isWF
#align hahn_series.is_wf_support HahnSeries.isWF_support
@[simp]
theorem mem_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (a : Γ) : a ∈ x.support ↔ x.coeff a ≠ 0 :=
Iff.refl _
#align hahn_series.mem_support HahnSeries.mem_support
instance : Zero (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨{ coeff := 0
isPWO_support' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨fun a b => a.ext b (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_coeff {a : Γ} : (0 : HahnSeries Γ R).coeff a = 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.zero_coeff HahnSeries.zero_coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff' rfl
#align hahn_series.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
mt (fun x0 => (x0.symm ▸ zero_coeff : x.coeff g = 0)) h
#align hahn_series.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero HahnSeries.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : support (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ∅ :=
Function.support_zero
#align hahn_series.support_zero HahnSeries.support_zero
@[simp]
nonrec theorem support_nonempty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support.Nonempty ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [support, support_nonempty_iff, Ne, coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff]
#align hahn_series.support_nonempty_iff HahnSeries.support_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support = ∅ ↔ x = 0 :=
support_eq_empty_iff.trans coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
#align hahn_series.support_eq_empty_iff HahnSeries.support_eq_empty_iff
def ofIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R)) :
HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
coeff := fun g => coeff (coeff x g.1) g.2
isPWO_support' := by
refine Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.subsetProdLex ?_ ?_
· refine Set.IsPWO.mono x.isPWO_support' ?_
simp_rw [Set.image_subset_iff, support_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Function.mem_support]
exact fun _ ↦ ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
· exact fun a => by simpa [Function.mem_support, ne_eq] using (x.coeff a).isPWO_support'
@[simp]
lemma mk_eq_zero (f : Γ → R) (h) : HahnSeries.mk f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [HahnSeries.ext_iff]
rfl
def toIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R) :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) where
coeff := fun g => {
coeff := fun g' => coeff x (g, g')
isPWO_support' := Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g
}
isPWO_support' := by
have h₁ : (Function.support fun g => HahnSeries.mk (fun g' => x.coeff (g, g'))
(Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g)) = Function.support
fun g => fun g' => x.coeff (g, g') := by
simp only [Function.support, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero]
rw [h₁, Function.support_curry' x.coeff]
exact Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.imageProdLex x.isPWO_support'
@[simps]
def iterateEquiv {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) ≃ HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
toFun := ofIterate
invFun := toIterate
left_inv := congrFun rfl
right_inv := congrFun rfl
def single (a : Γ) : ZeroHom R (HahnSeries Γ R) where
toFun r :=
{ coeff := Pi.single a r
isPWO_support' := (Set.isPWO_singleton a).mono Pi.support_single_subset }
map_zero' := HahnSeries.ext _ _ (Pi.single_zero _)
#align hahn_series.single HahnSeries.single
variable {a b : Γ} {r : R}
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_same (a : Γ) (r : R) : (single a r).coeff a = r :=
Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ => R) a r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_same HahnSeries.single_coeff_same
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_of_ne (h : b ≠ a) : (single a r).coeff b = 0 :=
Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) h r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_of_ne HahnSeries.single_coeff_of_ne
theorem single_coeff : (single a r).coeff b = if b = a then r else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align hahn_series.single_coeff HahnSeries.single_coeff
@[simp]
theorem support_single_of_ne (h : r ≠ 0) : support (single a r) = {a} :=
Pi.support_single_of_ne h
#align hahn_series.support_single_of_ne HahnSeries.support_single_of_ne
theorem support_single_subset : support (single a r) ⊆ {a} :=
Pi.support_single_subset
#align hahn_series.support_single_subset HahnSeries.support_single_subset
theorem eq_of_mem_support_single {b : Γ} (h : b ∈ support (single a r)) : b = a :=
support_single_subset h
#align hahn_series.eq_of_mem_support_single HahnSeries.eq_of_mem_support_single
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): simp can prove it
theorem single_eq_zero : single a (0 : R) = 0 :=
(single a).map_zero
#align hahn_series.single_eq_zero HahnSeries.single_eq_zero
theorem single_injective (a : Γ) : Function.Injective (single a : R → HahnSeries Γ R) :=
fun r s rs => by rw [← single_coeff_same a r, ← single_coeff_same a s, rs]
#align hahn_series.single_injective HahnSeries.single_injective
theorem single_ne_zero (h : r ≠ 0) : single a r ≠ 0 := fun con =>
h (single_injective a (con.trans single_eq_zero.symm))
#align hahn_series.single_ne_zero HahnSeries.single_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero_iff {a : Γ} {r : R} : single a r = 0 ↔ r = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff _ <| single_injective a
#align hahn_series.single_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.single_eq_zero_iff
instance [Nonempty Γ] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨r, s, rs⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
inhabit Γ
refine ⟨single default r, single default s, fun con => rs ?_⟩
rw [← single_coeff_same (default : Γ) r, con, single_coeff_same]⟩
section Domain
variable {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ']
def embDomain (f : Γ ↪o Γ') : HahnSeries Γ R → HahnSeries Γ' R := fun x =>
{ coeff := fun b : Γ' => if h : b ∈ f '' x.support then x.coeff (Classical.choose h) else 0
isPWO_support' :=
(x.isPWO_support.image_of_monotone f.monotone).mono fun b hb => by
contrapose! hb
rw [Function.mem_support, dif_neg hb, Classical.not_not] }
#align hahn_series.emb_domain HahnSeries.embDomain
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_coeff {f : Γ ↪o Γ'} {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {a : Γ} :
(embDomain f x).coeff (f a) = x.coeff a := by
rw [embDomain]
dsimp only
by_cases ha : a ∈ x.support
· rw [dif_pos (Set.mem_image_of_mem f ha)]
exact congr rfl (f.injective (Classical.choose_spec (Set.mem_image_of_mem f ha)).2)
· rw [dif_neg, Classical.not_not.1 fun c => ha ((mem_support _ _).2 c)]
contrapose! ha
obtain ⟨b, hb1, hb2⟩ := (Set.mem_image _ _ _).1 ha
rwa [f.injective hb2] at hb1
#align hahn_series.emb_domain_coeff HahnSeries.embDomain_coeff
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_mk_coeff {f : Γ → Γ'} (hfi : Function.Injective f)
(hf : ∀ g g' : Γ, f g ≤ f g' ↔ g ≤ g') {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {a : Γ} :
(embDomain ⟨⟨f, hfi⟩, hf _ _⟩ x).coeff (f a) = x.coeff a :=
embDomain_coeff
#align hahn_series.emb_domain_mk_coeff HahnSeries.embDomain_mk_coeff
theorem embDomain_notin_image_support {f : Γ ↪o Γ'} {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {b : Γ'}
(hb : b ∉ f '' x.support) : (embDomain f x).coeff b = 0 :=
dif_neg hb
#align hahn_series.emb_domain_notin_image_support HahnSeries.embDomain_notin_image_support
theorem support_embDomain_subset {f : Γ ↪o Γ'} {x : HahnSeries Γ R} :
support (embDomain f x) ⊆ f '' x.support := by
intro g hg
contrapose! hg
rw [mem_support, embDomain_notin_image_support hg, Classical.not_not]
#align hahn_series.support_emb_domain_subset HahnSeries.support_embDomain_subset
theorem embDomain_notin_range {f : Γ ↪o Γ'} {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {b : Γ'} (hb : b ∉ Set.range f) :
(embDomain f x).coeff b = 0 :=
embDomain_notin_image_support fun con => hb (Set.image_subset_range _ _ con)
#align hahn_series.emb_domain_notin_range HahnSeries.embDomain_notin_range
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Basic.lean | 395 | 397 | theorem embDomain_zero {f : Γ ↪o Γ'} : embDomain f (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = 0 := by |
ext
simp [embDomain_notin_image_support]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrongEpi
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.LiftingProperties.Adjunction
#align_import category_theory.functor.epi_mono from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
open CategoryTheory
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃}
[Category.{v₃} E]
class PreservesMonomorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f], Mono (F.map f)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.PreservesMonomorphisms
instance map_mono (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesMonomorphisms F] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
Mono (F.map f) :=
PreservesMonomorphisms.preserves f
#align category_theory.functor.map_mono CategoryTheory.Functor.map_mono
class PreservesEpimorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f], Epi (F.map f)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.PreservesEpimorphisms
instance map_epi (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesEpimorphisms F] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] :
Epi (F.map f) :=
PreservesEpimorphisms.preserves f
#align category_theory.functor.map_epi CategoryTheory.Functor.map_epi
class ReflectsMonomorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
reflects : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), Mono (F.map f) → Mono f
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsMonomorphisms
theorem mono_of_mono_map (F : C ⥤ D) [ReflectsMonomorphisms F] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(h : Mono (F.map f)) : Mono f :=
ReflectsMonomorphisms.reflects f h
#align category_theory.functor.mono_of_mono_map CategoryTheory.Functor.mono_of_mono_map
class ReflectsEpimorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
reflects : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), Epi (F.map f) → Epi f
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsEpimorphisms
theorem epi_of_epi_map (F : C ⥤ D) [ReflectsEpimorphisms F] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(h : Epi (F.map f)) : Epi f :=
ReflectsEpimorphisms.reflects f h
#align category_theory.functor.epi_of_epi_map CategoryTheory.Functor.epi_of_epi_map
instance preservesMonomorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [PreservesMonomorphisms F]
[PreservesMonomorphisms G] : PreservesMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
preserves f h := by
rw [comp_map]
exact inferInstance
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_comp
instance preservesEpimorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [PreservesEpimorphisms F]
[PreservesEpimorphisms G] : PreservesEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
preserves f h := by
rw [comp_map]
exact inferInstance
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms_comp
instance reflectsMonomorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [ReflectsMonomorphisms F]
[ReflectsMonomorphisms G] : ReflectsMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
reflects _ h := F.mono_of_mono_map (G.mono_of_mono_map h)
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms_comp
instance reflectsEpimorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [ReflectsEpimorphisms F]
[ReflectsEpimorphisms G] : ReflectsEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
reflects _ h := F.epi_of_epi_map (G.epi_of_epi_map h)
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms_comp
theorem preservesEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G)] [ReflectsEpimorphisms G] : PreservesEpimorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => G.epi_of_epi_map <| show Epi ((F ⋙ G).map f) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G)] [ReflectsMonomorphisms G] : PreservesMonomorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => G.mono_of_mono_map <| show Mono ((F ⋙ G).map f) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem reflectsEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesEpimorphisms G] [ReflectsEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G)] : ReflectsEpimorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => (F ⋙ G).epi_of_epi_map <| show Epi (G.map (F.map f)) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem reflectsMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesMonomorphisms G] [ReflectsMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G)] : ReflectsMonomorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => (F ⋙ G).mono_of_mono_map <| show Mono (G.map (F.map f)) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [PreservesMonomorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesMonomorphisms G :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
haveI : Mono (F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom) := mono_comp _ _
convert (mono_comp _ _ : Mono ((α.app X).inv ≫ F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom))
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso
theorem preservesMonomorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesMonomorphisms F ↔ PreservesMonomorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms.iso_iff
theorem preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [PreservesEpimorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesEpimorphisms G :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
haveI : Epi (F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom) := epi_comp _ _
convert (epi_comp _ _ : Epi ((α.app X).inv ≫ F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom))
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso
theorem preservesEpimorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesEpimorphisms F ↔ PreservesEpimorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms.iso_iff
theorem reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [ReflectsMonomorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsMonomorphisms G :=
{ reflects := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
apply F.mono_of_mono_map
haveI : Mono (G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv) := mono_comp _ _
convert (mono_comp _ _ : Mono ((α.app X).hom ≫ G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv))
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso
theorem reflectsMonomorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsMonomorphisms F ↔ ReflectsMonomorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms.iso_iff
theorem reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [ReflectsEpimorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsEpimorphisms G :=
{ reflects := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
apply F.epi_of_epi_map
haveI : Epi (G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv) := epi_comp _ _
convert (epi_comp _ _ : Epi ((α.app X).hom ≫ G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv))
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso
theorem reflectsEpimorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsEpimorphisms F ↔ ReflectsEpimorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms.iso_iff
theorem preservesEpimorphsisms_of_adjunction {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G) :
PreservesEpimorphisms F :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f hf =>
⟨by
intro Z g h H
replace H := congr_arg (adj.homEquiv X Z) H
rwa [adj.homEquiv_naturality_left, adj.homEquiv_naturality_left, cancel_epi,
Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq] at H⟩ }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphsisms_of_adjunction CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphsisms_of_adjunction
instance (priority := 100) preservesEpimorphisms_of_isLeftAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsLeftAdjoint F] :
PreservesEpimorphisms F :=
preservesEpimorphsisms_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint F)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms_of_is_left_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms_of_isLeftAdjoint
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_adjunction {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G) :
PreservesMonomorphisms G :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f hf =>
⟨by
intro Z g h H
replace H := congr_arg (adj.homEquiv Z Y).symm H
rwa [adj.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm, adj.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm, cancel_mono,
Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq] at H⟩ }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_of_adjunction CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_of_adjunction
instance (priority := 100) preservesMonomorphisms_of_isRightAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsRightAdjoint F] :
PreservesMonomorphisms F :=
preservesMonomorphisms_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint F)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_of_is_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_of_isRightAdjoint
instance (priority := 100) reflectsMonomorphisms_of_faithful (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] :
ReflectsMonomorphisms F where
reflects {X} {Y} f hf :=
⟨fun {Z} g h hgh =>
F.map_injective ((cancel_mono (F.map f)).1 (by rw [← F.map_comp, hgh, F.map_comp]))⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms_of_faithful CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms_of_faithful
instance (priority := 100) reflectsEpimorphisms_of_faithful (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] :
ReflectsEpimorphisms F where
reflects {X} {Y} f hf :=
⟨fun {Z} g h hgh =>
F.map_injective ((cancel_epi (F.map f)).1 (by rw [← F.map_comp, hgh, F.map_comp]))⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms_of_faithful CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms_of_faithful
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
noncomputable def splitEpiEquiv [Full F] [Faithful F] : SplitEpi f ≃ SplitEpi (F.map f) where
toFun f := f.map F
invFun s := ⟨F.preimage s.section_, by
apply F.map_injective
simp only [map_comp, map_preimage, map_id]
apply SplitEpi.id⟩
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv x := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.functor.split_epi_equiv CategoryTheory.Functor.splitEpiEquiv
@[simp]
theorem isSplitEpi_iff [Full F] [Faithful F] : IsSplitEpi (F.map f) ↔ IsSplitEpi f := by
constructor
· intro h
exact IsSplitEpi.mk' ((splitEpiEquiv F f).invFun h.exists_splitEpi.some)
· intro h
exact IsSplitEpi.mk' ((splitEpiEquiv F f).toFun h.exists_splitEpi.some)
#align category_theory.functor.is_split_epi_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.isSplitEpi_iff
noncomputable def splitMonoEquiv [Full F] [Faithful F] : SplitMono f ≃ SplitMono (F.map f) where
toFun f := f.map F
invFun s := ⟨F.preimage s.retraction, by
apply F.map_injective
simp only [map_comp, map_preimage, map_id]
apply SplitMono.id⟩
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv x := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.functor.split_mono_equiv CategoryTheory.Functor.splitMonoEquiv
@[simp]
theorem isSplitMono_iff [Full F] [Faithful F] : IsSplitMono (F.map f) ↔ IsSplitMono f := by
constructor
· intro h
exact IsSplitMono.mk' ((splitMonoEquiv F f).invFun h.exists_splitMono.some)
· intro h
exact IsSplitMono.mk' ((splitMonoEquiv F f).toFun h.exists_splitMono.some)
#align category_theory.functor.is_split_mono_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.isSplitMono_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Functor/EpiMono.lean | 264 | 269 | theorem epi_map_iff_epi [hF₁ : PreservesEpimorphisms F] [hF₂ : ReflectsEpimorphisms F] :
Epi (F.map f) ↔ Epi f := by |
constructor
· exact F.epi_of_epi_map
· intro h
exact F.map_epi f
|
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Real
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
#align_import topology.metric_space.emetric_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
open Set Filter Classical
open scoped Uniformity Topology Filter NNReal ENNReal Pointwise
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X : Type*}
theorem uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity [LinearOrder β] {U : Filter (α × α)} (z : β)
(D : α → α → β) (H : ∀ s, s ∈ U ↔ ∃ ε > z, ∀ {a b : α}, D a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s) :
U = ⨅ ε > z, 𝓟 { p : α × α | D p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
HasBasis.eq_biInf ⟨fun s => by simp only [H, subset_def, Prod.forall, mem_setOf]⟩
#align uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity
@[ext]
class EDist (α : Type*) where
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞
#align has_edist EDist
export EDist (edist)
def uniformSpaceOfEDist (edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞) (edist_self : ∀ x : α, edist x x = 0)
(edist_comm : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = edist y x)
(edist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, edist x z ≤ edist x y + edist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle fun ε ε0 =>
⟨ε / 2, ENNReal.half_pos ε0.ne', fun _ h₁ _ h₂ =>
(ENNReal.add_lt_add h₁ h₂).trans_eq (ENNReal.add_halves _)⟩
#align uniform_space_of_edist uniformSpaceOfEDist
-- the uniform structure is embedded in the emetric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
class PseudoEMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends EDist α : Type u where
edist_self : ∀ x : α, edist x x = 0
edist_comm : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = edist y x
edist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, edist x z ≤ edist x y + edist y z
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := uniformSpaceOfEDist edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle
uniformity_edist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by rfl
#align pseudo_emetric_space PseudoEMetricSpace
attribute [instance] PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace
@[ext]
protected theorem PseudoEMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoEMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toEDist = m'.toEDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with ed _ _ _ U hU
cases' m' with ed' _ _ _ U' hU'
congr 1
exact UniformSpace.ext (((show ed = ed' from h) ▸ hU).trans hU'.symm)
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
export PseudoEMetricSpace (edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle)
attribute [simp] edist_self
theorem edist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : edist x y ≤ edist z x + edist z y := by
rw [edist_comm z]; apply edist_triangle
#align edist_triangle_left edist_triangle_left
theorem edist_triangle_right (x y z : α) : edist x y ≤ edist x z + edist y z := by
rw [edist_comm y]; apply edist_triangle
#align edist_triangle_right edist_triangle_right
theorem edist_congr_right {x y z : α} (h : edist x y = 0) : edist x z = edist y z := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← zero_add (edist y z), ← h]
apply edist_triangle
· rw [edist_comm] at h
rw [← zero_add (edist x z), ← h]
apply edist_triangle
#align edist_congr_right edist_congr_right
theorem edist_congr_left {x y z : α} (h : edist x y = 0) : edist z x = edist z y := by
rw [edist_comm z x, edist_comm z y]
apply edist_congr_right h
#align edist_congr_left edist_congr_left
-- new theorem
theorem edist_congr {w x y z : α} (hl : edist w x = 0) (hr : edist y z = 0) :
edist w y = edist x z :=
(edist_congr_right hl).trans (edist_congr_left hr)
theorem edist_triangle4 (x y z t : α) : edist x t ≤ edist x y + edist y z + edist z t :=
calc
edist x t ≤ edist x z + edist z t := edist_triangle x z t
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z + edist z t := add_le_add_right (edist_triangle x y z) _
#align edist_triangle4 edist_triangle4
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) := by
induction n, h using Nat.le_induction with
| base => rw [Finset.Ico_self, Finset.sum_empty, edist_self]
| succ n hle ihn =>
calc
edist (f m) (f (n + 1)) ≤ edist (f m) (f n) + edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, _) + _ := add_le_add ihn le_rfl
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m (n + 1), _ := by
{ rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hle, Finset.sum_insert, add_comm]; simp }
#align edist_le_Ico_sum_edist edist_le_Ico_sum_edist
theorem edist_le_range_sum_edist (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, edist (f i) (f (i + 1)) :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f (Nat.zero_le n)
#align edist_le_range_sum_edist edist_le_range_sum_edist
theorem edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k → k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f m) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico m n, d i :=
le_trans (edist_le_Ico_sum_edist f hmn) <|
Finset.sum_le_sum fun _k hk => hd (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).1 (Finset.mem_Ico.1 hk).2
#align edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le
theorem edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le {f : ℕ → α} (n : ℕ) {d : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(hd : ∀ {k}, k < n → edist (f k) (f (k + 1)) ≤ d k) :
edist (f 0) (f n) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, d i :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ edist_le_Ico_sum_of_edist_le (zero_le n) fun _ => hd
#align edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le edist_le_range_sum_of_edist_le
theorem uniformity_pseudoedist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist
#align uniformity_pseudoedist uniformity_pseudoedist
theorem uniformSpace_edist :
‹PseudoEMetricSpace α›.toUniformSpace =
uniformSpaceOfEDist edist edist_self edist_comm edist_triangle :=
UniformSpace.ext uniformity_pseudoedist
#align uniform_space_edist uniformSpace_edist
theorem uniformity_basis_edist :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
(@uniformSpace_edist α _).symm ▸ UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun ⟨1, one_pos⟩ _ _ _ _ _
#align uniformity_basis_edist uniformity_basis_edist
theorem mem_uniformity_edist {s : Set (α × α)} :
s ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ ε > 0, ∀ {a b : α}, edist a b < ε → (a, b) ∈ s :=
uniformity_basis_edist.mem_uniformity_iff
#align mem_uniformity_edist mem_uniformity_edist
protected theorem EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_edist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases hf ε ε₀ with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x hx => hε <| lt_of_lt_of_le hx.out H⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, H⟩
#align emetric.mk_uniformity_basis EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis
protected theorem EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le {β : Type*} {p : β → Prop} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf₀ : ∀ x, p x → 0 < f x) (hf : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x, p x ∧ f x ≤ ε) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun x => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ f x } := by
refine ⟨fun s => uniformity_basis_edist.mem_iff.trans ?_⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨ε, ε₀, hε⟩
rcases exists_between ε₀ with ⟨ε', hε'⟩
rcases hf ε' hε'.1 with ⟨i, hi, H⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, fun x hx => hε <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans hx.out H) hε'.2⟩
· exact fun ⟨i, hi, H⟩ => ⟨f i, hf₀ i hi, fun x hx => H (le_of_lt hx.out)⟩
#align emetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => id) fun ε ε₀ => ⟨ε, ε₀, le_refl ε⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_le uniformity_basis_edist_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist' (ε' : ℝ≥0∞) (hε' : 0 < ε') :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => ε ∈ Ioo 0 ε') fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => And.left) fun ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := exists_between hε'
⟨min ε δ, ⟨lt_min ε₀ hδ.1, lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) hδ.2⟩, min_le_left _ _⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist' uniformity_basis_edist'
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_le' (ε' : ℝ≥0∞) (hε' : 0 < ε') :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0∞ => ε ∈ Ioo 0 ε') fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => And.left) fun ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := exists_between hε'
⟨min ε δ, ⟨lt_min ε₀ hδ.1, lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_right _ _) hδ.2⟩, min_le_left _ _⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_le' uniformity_basis_edist_le'
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ => ENNReal.coe_pos.2) fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ε₀
⟨δ, ENNReal.coe_pos.1 hδ.1, le_of_lt hδ.2⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis_le (fun _ => ENNReal.coe_pos.2) fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨δ, hδ⟩ := ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 ε₀
⟨δ, ENNReal.coe_pos.1 hδ.1, le_of_lt hδ.2⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le uniformity_basis_edist_nnreal_le
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < (↑n)⁻¹ } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun n _ ↦ ENNReal.inv_pos.2 <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top n) fun _ε ε₀ ↦
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_inv_nat_lt (ne_of_gt ε₀)
⟨n, trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat uniformity_basis_edist_inv_nat
theorem uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun _ => True) fun n : ℕ => { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < 2⁻¹ ^ n } :=
EMetric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ => ENNReal.pow_pos (ENNReal.inv_pos.2 ENNReal.two_ne_top) _)
fun _ε ε₀ =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := ENNReal.exists_inv_two_pow_lt (ne_of_gt ε₀)
⟨n, trivial, le_of_lt hn⟩
#align uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow uniformity_basis_edist_inv_two_pow
theorem edist_mem_uniformity {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε0 : 0 < ε) : { p : α × α | edist p.1 p.2 < ε } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
mem_uniformity_edist.2 ⟨ε, ε0, id⟩
#align edist_mem_uniformity edist_mem_uniformity
open EMetric
def PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity {α} [U : UniformSpace α] (m : PseudoEMetricSpace α)
(H : 𝓤[U] = 𝓤[PseudoEMetricSpace.toUniformSpace]) : PseudoEMetricSpace α where
edist := @edist _ m.toEDist
edist_self := edist_self
edist_comm := edist_comm
edist_triangle := edist_triangle
toUniformSpace := U
uniformity_edist := H.trans (@PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist α _)
#align pseudo_emetric_space.replace_uniformity PseudoEMetricSpace.replaceUniformity
def PseudoEMetricSpace.induced {α β} (f : α → β) (m : PseudoEMetricSpace β) :
PseudoEMetricSpace α where
edist x y := edist (f x) (f y)
edist_self _ := edist_self _
edist_comm _ _ := edist_comm _ _
edist_triangle _ _ _ := edist_triangle _ _ _
toUniformSpace := UniformSpace.comap f m.toUniformSpace
uniformity_edist := (uniformity_basis_edist.comap (Prod.map f f)).eq_biInf
#align pseudo_emetric_space.induced PseudoEMetricSpace.induced
instance {α : Type*} {p : α → Prop} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : PseudoEMetricSpace (Subtype p) :=
PseudoEMetricSpace.induced Subtype.val ‹_›
theorem Subtype.edist_eq {p : α → Prop} (x y : Subtype p) : edist x y = edist (x : α) y := rfl
#align subtype.edist_eq Subtype.edist_eq
instance Prod.pseudoEMetricSpaceMax [PseudoEMetricSpace β] : PseudoEMetricSpace (α × β) where
edist x y := edist x.1 y.1 ⊔ edist x.2 y.2
edist_self x := by simp
edist_comm x y := by simp [edist_comm]
edist_triangle x y z :=
max_le (le_trans (edist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)))
(le_trans (edist_triangle _ _ _) (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _)))
uniformity_edist := uniformity_prod.trans <| by
simp [PseudoEMetricSpace.uniformity_edist, ← iInf_inf_eq, setOf_and]
toUniformSpace := inferInstance
#align prod.pseudo_emetric_space_max Prod.pseudoEMetricSpaceMax
theorem Prod.edist_eq [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (x y : α × β) :
edist x y = max (edist x.1 y.1) (edist x.2 y.2) :=
rfl
#align prod.edist_eq Prod.edist_eq
namespace EMetric
variable {x y z : α} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α}
def ball (x : α) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) : Set α :=
{ y | edist y x < ε }
#align emetric.ball EMetric.ball
@[simp] theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ edist y x < ε := Iff.rfl
#align emetric.mem_ball EMetric.mem_ball
theorem mem_ball' : y ∈ ball x ε ↔ edist x y < ε := by rw [edist_comm, mem_ball]
#align emetric.mem_ball' EMetric.mem_ball'
def closedBall (x : α) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :=
{ y | edist y x ≤ ε }
#align emetric.closed_ball EMetric.closedBall
@[simp] theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ edist y x ≤ ε := Iff.rfl
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball EMetric.mem_closedBall
theorem mem_closedBall' : y ∈ closedBall x ε ↔ edist x y ≤ ε := by rw [edist_comm, mem_closedBall]
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball' EMetric.mem_closedBall'
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_top (x : α) : closedBall x ∞ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => mem_setOf.2 le_top
#align emetric.closed_ball_top EMetric.closedBall_top
theorem ball_subset_closedBall : ball x ε ⊆ closedBall x ε := fun _ h => le_of_lt h.out
#align emetric.ball_subset_closed_ball EMetric.ball_subset_closedBall
theorem pos_of_mem_ball (hy : y ∈ ball x ε) : 0 < ε :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le _) hy
#align emetric.pos_of_mem_ball EMetric.pos_of_mem_ball
theorem mem_ball_self (h : 0 < ε) : x ∈ ball x ε := by
rwa [mem_ball, edist_self]
#align emetric.mem_ball_self EMetric.mem_ball_self
theorem mem_closedBall_self : x ∈ closedBall x ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall, edist_self]; apply zero_le
#align emetric.mem_closed_ball_self EMetric.mem_closedBall_self
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Basic.lean | 583 | 583 | theorem mem_ball_comm : x ∈ ball y ε ↔ y ∈ ball x ε := by | rw [mem_ball', mem_ball]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
#align_import order.filter.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
open Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section Prod
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β}
protected def prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter (α × β) :=
f.comap Prod.fst ⊓ g.comap Prod.snd
#align filter.prod Filter.prod
instance instSProd : SProd (Filter α) (Filter β) (Filter (α × β)) where
sprod := Filter.prod
theorem prod_mem_prod (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g :=
inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hs) (preimage_mem_comap ht)
#align filter.prod_mem_prod Filter.prod_mem_prod
theorem mem_prod_iff {s : Set (α × β)} {f : Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ×ˢ t₂ ⊆ s := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t₁, ⟨s₁, hs₁, hts₁⟩, t₂, ⟨s₂, hs₂, hts₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, fun p ⟨h, h'⟩ => ⟨hts₁ h, hts₂ h'⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨t₁, ht₁, t₂, ht₂, h⟩
exact mem_inf_of_inter (preimage_mem_comap ht₁) (preimage_mem_comap ht₂) h
#align filter.mem_prod_iff Filter.mem_prod_iff
@[simp]
theorem prod_mem_prod_iff [f.NeBot] [g.NeBot] : s ×ˢ t ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_s', hs', _t', ht', H⟩ := mem_prod_iff.1 h
(prod_subset_prod_iff.1 H).elim
(fun ⟨hs's, ht't⟩ => ⟨mem_of_superset hs' hs's, mem_of_superset ht' ht't⟩) fun h =>
h.elim (fun hs'e => absurd hs'e (nonempty_of_mem hs').ne_empty) fun ht'e =>
absurd ht'e (nonempty_of_mem ht').ne_empty,
fun h => prod_mem_prod h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_mem_prod_iff Filter.prod_mem_prod_iff
theorem mem_prod_principal {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ 𝓟 t ↔ { a | ∀ b ∈ t, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← @exists_mem_subset_iff _ f, mem_prod_iff]
refine exists_congr fun u => Iff.rfl.and ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨t, mem_principal_self t, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨v, v_in, hv⟩ a a_in b b_in
exact hv (mk_mem_prod a_in <| v_in b_in)
· rintro ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩
exact h hx y hy
#align filter.mem_prod_principal Filter.mem_prod_principal
theorem mem_prod_top {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) ↔ { a | ∀ b, (a, b) ∈ s } ∈ f := by
rw [← principal_univ, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align filter.mem_prod_top Filter.mem_prod_top
theorem eventually_prod_principal_iff {p : α × β → Prop} {s : Set β} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x : α in f, ∀ y : β, y ∈ s → p (x, y) := by
rw [eventually_iff, eventually_iff, mem_prod_principal]
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]
#align filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff Filter.eventually_prod_principal_iff
theorem comap_prod (f : α → β × γ) (b : Filter β) (c : Filter γ) :
comap f (b ×ˢ c) = comap (Prod.fst ∘ f) b ⊓ comap (Prod.snd ∘ f) c := by
erw [comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Filter.comap_comap]
#align filter.comap_prod Filter.comap_prod
theorem prod_top : f ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter β) = f.comap Prod.fst := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, inf_top_eq]
#align filter.prod_top Filter.prod_top
theorem top_prod : (⊤ : Filter α) ×ˢ g = g.comap Prod.snd := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_top, top_inf_eq]
theorem sup_prod (f₁ f₂ : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : (f₁ ⊔ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊔ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_right, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.sup_prod Filter.sup_prod
theorem prod_sup (f : Filter α) (g₁ g₂ : Filter β) : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊔ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_sup, inf_sup_left, ← Filter.prod, ← Filter.prod]
#align filter.prod_sup Filter.prod_sup
theorem eventually_prod_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔
∃ pa : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f, pa x) ∧ ∃ pb : β → Prop, (∀ᶠ y in g, pb y) ∧
∀ {x}, pa x → ∀ {y}, pb y → p (x, y) := by
simpa only [Set.prod_subset_iff] using @mem_prod_iff α β p f g
#align filter.eventually_prod_iff Filter.eventually_prod_iff
theorem tendsto_fst : Tendsto Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) f :=
tendsto_inf_left tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_fst Filter.tendsto_fst
theorem tendsto_snd : Tendsto Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) g :=
tendsto_inf_right tendsto_comap
#align filter.tendsto_snd Filter.tendsto_snd
theorem Tendsto.fst {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).1) f g :=
tendsto_fst.comp H
theorem Tendsto.snd {h : Filter γ} {m : α → β × γ} (H : Tendsto m f (g ×ˢ h)) :
Tendsto (fun a ↦ (m a).2) f h :=
tendsto_snd.comp H
theorem Tendsto.prod_mk {h : Filter γ} {m₁ : α → β} {m₂ : α → γ}
(h₁ : Tendsto m₁ f g) (h₂ : Tendsto m₂ f h) : Tendsto (fun x => (m₁ x, m₂ x)) f (g ×ˢ h) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
#align filter.tendsto.prod_mk Filter.Tendsto.prod_mk
theorem tendsto_prod_swap : Tendsto (Prod.swap : α × β → β × α) (f ×ˢ g) (g ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_snd.prod_mk tendsto_fst
#align filter.tendsto_prod_swap Filter.tendsto_prod_swap
theorem Eventually.prod_inl {la : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in la, p x) (lb : Filter β) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).1 :=
tendsto_fst.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inl Filter.Eventually.prod_inl
theorem Eventually.prod_inr {lb : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in lb, p x) (la : Filter α) :
∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p (x : α × β).2 :=
tendsto_snd.eventually h
#align filter.eventually.prod_inr Filter.Eventually.prod_inr
theorem Eventually.prod_mk {la : Filter α} {pa : α → Prop} (ha : ∀ᶠ x in la, pa x) {lb : Filter β}
{pb : β → Prop} (hb : ∀ᶠ y in lb, pb y) : ∀ᶠ p in la ×ˢ lb, pa (p : α × β).1 ∧ pb p.2 :=
(ha.prod_inl lb).and (hb.prod_inr la)
#align filter.eventually.prod_mk Filter.Eventually.prod_mk
theorem EventuallyEq.prod_map {δ} {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa =ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb =ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb =ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
(Eventually.prod_mk ha hb).mono fun _ h => Prod.ext h.1 h.2
#align filter.eventually_eq.prod_map Filter.EventuallyEq.prod_map
theorem EventuallyLE.prod_map {δ} [LE γ] [LE δ] {la : Filter α} {fa ga : α → γ} (ha : fa ≤ᶠ[la] ga)
{lb : Filter β} {fb gb : β → δ} (hb : fb ≤ᶠ[lb] gb) :
Prod.map fa fb ≤ᶠ[la ×ˢ lb] Prod.map ga gb :=
Eventually.prod_mk ha hb
#align filter.eventually_le.prod_map Filter.EventuallyLE.prod_map
theorem Eventually.curry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α × β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in la ×ˢ lb, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in la, ∀ᶠ y in lb, p (x, y) := by
rcases eventually_prod_iff.1 h with ⟨pa, ha, pb, hb, h⟩
exact ha.mono fun a ha => hb.mono fun b hb => h ha hb
#align filter.eventually.curry Filter.Eventually.curry
protected lemma Frequently.uncurry {la : Filter α} {lb : Filter β} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in la, ∃ᶠ y in lb, p x y) : ∃ᶠ xy in la ×ˢ lb, p xy.1 xy.2 :=
mt (fun h ↦ by simpa only [not_frequently] using h.curry) h
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod {p : α × α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ i in f ×ˢ f, p i) :
∀ᶠ i in f, p (i, i) := by
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
apply (ht.and hs).mono fun x hx => hst hx.1 hx.2
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_left {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : (α × α) × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in (f ×ˢ f) ×ˢ g, p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p ((x.1, x.1), x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.diag_of_prod.prod_mk hs).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_left Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_left
theorem Eventually.diag_of_prod_right {f : Filter α} {g : Filter γ} {p : α × γ × γ → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ g), p x) → ∀ᶠ x : α × γ in f ×ˢ g, p (x.1, x.2, x.2) := by
intro h
obtain ⟨t, ht, s, hs, hst⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 h
exact (ht.prod_mk hs.diag_of_prod).mono fun x hx => by simp only [hst hx.1 hx.2]
#align filter.eventually.diag_of_prod_right Filter.Eventually.diag_of_prod_right
theorem tendsto_diag : Tendsto (fun i => (i, i)) f (f ×ˢ f) :=
tendsto_iff_eventually.mpr fun _ hpr => hpr.diag_of_prod
#align filter.tendsto_diag Filter.tendsto_diag
theorem prod_iInf_left [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Filter α} {g : Filter β} :
(⨅ i, f i) ×ˢ g = ⨅ i, f i ×ˢ g := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, iInf_inf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_left Filter.prod_iInf_left
theorem prod_iInf_right [Nonempty ι] {f : Filter α} {g : ι → Filter β} :
(f ×ˢ ⨅ i, g i) = ⨅ i, f ×ˢ g i := by
dsimp only [SProd.sprod]
rw [Filter.prod, comap_iInf, inf_iInf]
simp only [Filter.prod, eq_self_iff_true]
#align filter.prod_infi_right Filter.prod_iInf_right
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem prod_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ :=
inf_le_inf (comap_mono hf) (comap_mono hg)
#align filter.prod_mono Filter.prod_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (g : Filter β) {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) : f₁ ×ˢ g ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g :=
Filter.prod_mono hf rfl.le
#align filter.prod_mono_left Filter.prod_mono_left
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (f : Filter α) {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} (hf : g₁ ≤ g₂) : f ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f ×ˢ g₂ :=
Filter.prod_mono rfl.le hf
#align filter.prod_mono_right Filter.prod_mono_right
theorem prod_comap_comap_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : β₁ → α₁} {m₂ : β₂ → α₂} :
comap m₁ f₁ ×ˢ comap m₂ f₂ = comap (fun p : β₁ × β₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, comap_inf, (· ∘ ·)]
#align filter.prod_comap_comap_eq Filter.prod_comap_comap_eq
theorem prod_comm' : f ×ˢ g = comap Prod.swap (g ×ˢ f) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), inf_comm, Prod.swap, comap_inf]
#align filter.prod_comm' Filter.prod_comm'
theorem prod_comm : f ×ˢ g = map (fun p : β × α => (p.2, p.1)) (g ×ˢ f) := by
rw [prod_comm', ← map_swap_eq_comap_swap]
rfl
#align filter.prod_comm Filter.prod_comm
theorem mem_prod_iff_left {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ f, ∀ᶠ y in g, ∀ x ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
simp only [mem_prod_iff, prod_subset_iff]
refine exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and <| Iff.trans ?_ exists_mem_subset_iff
exact exists_congr fun _ => Iff.rfl.and forall₂_swap
theorem mem_prod_iff_right {s : Set (α × β)} :
s ∈ f ×ˢ g ↔ ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ s := by
rw [prod_comm, mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_fst_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot g] : map Prod.fst (f ×ˢ g) = f := by
ext s
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff_left, mem_preimage, eventually_const, ← subset_def,
exists_mem_subset_iff]
#align filter.map_fst_prod Filter.map_fst_prod
@[simp]
theorem map_snd_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) [NeBot f] : map Prod.snd (f ×ˢ g) = g := by
rw [prod_comm, map_map]; apply map_fst_prod
#align filter.map_snd_prod Filter.map_snd_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_le_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ ≤ f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨map_fst_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_fst.mono_left h, map_snd_prod f₁ g₁ ▸ tendsto_snd.mono_left h⟩,
fun h => prod_mono h.1 h.2⟩
#align filter.prod_le_prod Filter.prod_le_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_inj {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} [NeBot f₁] [NeBot g₁] :
f₁ ×ˢ g₁ = f₂ ×ˢ g₂ ↔ f₁ = f₂ ∧ g₁ = g₂ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.1 ▸ h.2 ▸ rfl⟩
have hle : f₁ ≤ f₂ ∧ g₁ ≤ g₂ := prod_le_prod.1 h.le
haveI := neBot_of_le hle.1; haveI := neBot_of_le hle.2
exact ⟨hle.1.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).1, hle.2.antisymm <| (prod_le_prod.1 h.ge).2⟩
#align filter.prod_inj Filter.prod_inj
theorem eventually_swap_iff {p : α × β → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x : α × β in f ×ˢ g, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ y : β × α in g ×ˢ f, p y.swap := by
rw [prod_comm]; rfl
#align filter.eventually_swap_iff Filter.eventually_swap_iff
theorem prod_assoc (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) = f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h) := by
simp_rw [← comap_equiv_symm, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc, (· ∘ ·),
Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply]
#align filter.prod_assoc Filter.prod_assoc
theorem prod_assoc_symm (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) (h : Filter γ) :
map (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) = (f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h := by
simp_rw [map_equiv_symm, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap, inf_assoc,
Function.comp, Equiv.prodAssoc_apply]
#align filter.prod_assoc_symm Filter.prod_assoc_symm
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) :=
(prod_assoc f g h).le
#align filter.tendsto_prod_assoc Filter.tendsto_prodAssoc
theorem tendsto_prodAssoc_symm {h : Filter γ} :
Tendsto (Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ).symm (f ×ˢ (g ×ˢ h)) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ h) :=
(prod_assoc_symm f g h).le
#align filter.tendsto_prod_assoc_symm Filter.tendsto_prodAssoc_symm
theorem map_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
map (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k)) =
(f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k) := by
simp_rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, comap_comap]; ac_rfl
#align filter.map_swap4_prod Filter.map_swap4_prod
theorem tendsto_swap4_prod {h : Filter γ} {k : Filter δ} :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × γ × δ => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) ((f ×ˢ g) ×ˢ (h ×ˢ k))
((f ×ˢ h) ×ˢ (g ×ˢ k)) :=
map_swap4_prod.le
#align filter.tendsto_swap4_prod Filter.tendsto_swap4_prod
theorem prod_map_map_eq.{u, v, w, x} {α₁ : Type u} {α₂ : Type v} {β₁ : Type w} {β₂ : Type x}
{f₁ : Filter α₁} {f₂ : Filter α₂} {m₁ : α₁ → β₁} {m₂ : α₂ → β₂} :
map m₁ f₁ ×ˢ map m₂ f₂ = map (fun p : α₁ × α₂ => (m₁ p.1, m₂ p.2)) (f₁ ×ˢ f₂) :=
le_antisymm
(fun s hs =>
let ⟨s₁, hs₁, s₂, hs₂, h⟩ := mem_prod_iff.mp hs
mem_of_superset (prod_mem_prod (image_mem_map hs₁) (image_mem_map hs₂)) <|
by rwa [prod_image_image_eq, image_subset_iff])
((tendsto_map.comp tendsto_fst).prod_mk (tendsto_map.comp tendsto_snd))
#align filter.prod_map_map_eq Filter.prod_map_map_eq
theorem prod_map_map_eq' {α₁ : Type*} {α₂ : Type*} {β₁ : Type*} {β₂ : Type*} (f : α₁ → α₂)
(g : β₁ → β₂) (F : Filter α₁) (G : Filter β₁) :
map f F ×ˢ map g G = map (Prod.map f g) (F ×ˢ G) :=
prod_map_map_eq
#align filter.prod_map_map_eq' Filter.prod_map_map_eq'
theorem prod_map_left (f : α → β) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter γ) :
map f F ×ˢ G = map (Prod.map f id) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem prod_map_right (f : β → γ) (F : Filter α) (G : Filter β) :
F ×ˢ map f G = map (Prod.map id f) (F ×ˢ G) := by
rw [← prod_map_map_eq', map_id]
theorem le_prod_map_fst_snd {f : Filter (α × β)} : f ≤ map Prod.fst f ×ˢ map Prod.snd f :=
le_inf le_comap_map le_comap_map
#align filter.le_prod_map_fst_snd Filter.le_prod_map_fst_snd
theorem Tendsto.prod_map {δ : Type*} {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {a : Filter α} {b : Filter β}
{c : Filter γ} {d : Filter δ} (hf : Tendsto f a c) (hg : Tendsto g b d) :
Tendsto (Prod.map f g) (a ×ˢ b) (c ×ˢ d) := by
erw [Tendsto, ← prod_map_map_eq]
exact Filter.prod_mono hf hg
#align filter.tendsto.prod_map Filter.Tendsto.prod_map
protected theorem map_prod (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map m (f ×ˢ g) = (f.map fun a b => m (a, b)).seq g := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_map, mem_prod_iff, mem_map_seq_iff, exists_and_left]
intro s
constructor
· exact fun ⟨t, ht, s, hs, h⟩ => ⟨s, hs, t, ht, fun x hx y hy => @h ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩⟩
· exact fun ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩ => ⟨t, ht, s, hs, fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => h x hx y hy⟩
#align filter.map_prod Filter.map_prod
theorem prod_eq : f ×ˢ g = (f.map Prod.mk).seq g := f.map_prod id g
#align filter.prod_eq Filter.prod_eq
theorem prod_inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} :
(f₁ ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g₂) = (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) := by
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_inf, inf_comm, inf_assoc, inf_left_comm]
#align filter.prod_inf_prod Filter.prod_inf_prod
theorem inf_prod {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} : (f₁ ⊓ f₂) ×ˢ g = (f₁ ×ˢ g) ⊓ (f₂ ×ˢ g) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
theorem prod_inf {g₁ g₂ : Filter β} : f ×ˢ (g₁ ⊓ g₂) = (f ×ˢ g₁) ⊓ (f ×ˢ g₂) := by
rw [prod_inf_prod, inf_idem]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Prod.lean | 416 | 418 | theorem prod_principal_principal {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : 𝓟 s ×ˢ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ×ˢ t) := by |
simp only [SProd.sprod, Filter.prod, comap_principal, principal_eq_iff_eq, comap_principal,
inf_principal]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
#align_import algebra.free_monoid.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"657df4339ae6ceada048c8a2980fb10e393143ec"
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {M : Type*} [Monoid M] {N : Type*} [Monoid N]
@[to_additive "Free nonabelian additive monoid over a given alphabet"]
def FreeMonoid (α) := List α
#align free_monoid FreeMonoid
#align free_add_monoid FreeAddMonoid
namespace FreeMonoid
@[to_additive "The identity equivalence between `FreeAddMonoid α` and `List α`."]
def toList : FreeMonoid α ≃ List α := Equiv.refl _
#align free_monoid.to_list FreeMonoid.toList
#align free_add_monoid.to_list FreeAddMonoid.toList
@[to_additive "The identity equivalence between `List α` and `FreeAddMonoid α`."]
def ofList : List α ≃ FreeMonoid α := Equiv.refl _
#align free_monoid.of_list FreeMonoid.ofList
#align free_add_monoid.of_list FreeAddMonoid.ofList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toList_symm : (@toList α).symm = ofList := rfl
#align free_monoid.to_list_symm FreeMonoid.toList_symm
#align free_add_monoid.to_list_symm FreeAddMonoid.toList_symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofList_symm : (@ofList α).symm = toList := rfl
#align free_monoid.of_list_symm FreeMonoid.ofList_symm
#align free_add_monoid.of_list_symm FreeAddMonoid.ofList_symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toList_ofList (l : List α) : toList (ofList l) = l := rfl
#align free_monoid.to_list_of_list FreeMonoid.toList_ofList
#align free_add_monoid.to_list_of_list FreeAddMonoid.toList_ofList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofList_toList (xs : FreeMonoid α) : ofList (toList xs) = xs := rfl
#align free_monoid.of_list_to_list FreeMonoid.ofList_toList
#align free_add_monoid.of_list_to_list FreeAddMonoid.ofList_toList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toList_comp_ofList : @toList α ∘ ofList = id := rfl
#align free_monoid.to_list_comp_of_list FreeMonoid.toList_comp_ofList
#align free_add_monoid.to_list_comp_of_list FreeAddMonoid.toList_comp_ofList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofList_comp_toList : @ofList α ∘ toList = id := rfl
#align free_monoid.of_list_comp_to_list FreeMonoid.ofList_comp_toList
#align free_add_monoid.of_list_comp_to_list FreeAddMonoid.ofList_comp_toList
@[to_additive]
instance : CancelMonoid (FreeMonoid α) where
one := ofList []
mul x y := ofList (toList x ++ toList y)
mul_one := List.append_nil
one_mul := List.nil_append
mul_assoc := List.append_assoc
mul_left_cancel _ _ _ := List.append_cancel_left
mul_right_cancel _ _ _ := List.append_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (FreeMonoid α) := ⟨1⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toList_one : toList (1 : FreeMonoid α) = [] := rfl
#align free_monoid.to_list_one FreeMonoid.toList_one
#align free_add_monoid.to_list_zero FreeAddMonoid.toList_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofList_nil : ofList ([] : List α) = 1 := rfl
#align free_monoid.of_list_nil FreeMonoid.ofList_nil
#align free_add_monoid.of_list_nil FreeAddMonoid.ofList_nil
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toList_mul (xs ys : FreeMonoid α) : toList (xs * ys) = toList xs ++ toList ys := rfl
#align free_monoid.to_list_mul FreeMonoid.toList_mul
#align free_add_monoid.to_list_add FreeAddMonoid.toList_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofList_append (xs ys : List α) : ofList (xs ++ ys) = ofList xs * ofList ys := rfl
#align free_monoid.of_list_append FreeMonoid.ofList_append
#align free_add_monoid.of_list_append FreeAddMonoid.ofList_append
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/FreeMonoid/Basic.lean | 111 | 112 | theorem toList_prod (xs : List (FreeMonoid α)) : toList xs.prod = (xs.map toList).join := by |
induction xs <;> simp [*, List.join]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.ZPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Deriv
#align_import analysis.convex.specific_functions.deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a16665637b378379689c566204817ae792ac8b39"
open Real Set
open scoped NNReal
theorem strictConvexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : StrictConvexOn ℝ (Ici 0) fun x : ℝ => x ^ n := by
apply StrictMonoOn.strictConvexOn_of_deriv (convex_Ici _) (continuousOn_pow _)
rw [deriv_pow', interior_Ici]
exact fun x (hx : 0 < x) y _ hxy => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
(pow_lt_pow_left hxy hx.le <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn) (by positivity)
#align strict_convex_on_pow strictConvexOn_pow
theorem Even.strictConvexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) (h : n ≠ 0) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ Set.univ fun x : ℝ => x ^ n := by
apply StrictMono.strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv (continuous_pow n)
rw [deriv_pow']
replace h := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
exact StrictMono.const_mul (Odd.strictMono_pow <| Nat.Even.sub_odd h hn <| Nat.odd_iff.2 rfl)
(Nat.cast_pos.2 h)
#align even.strict_convex_on_pow Even.strictConvexOn_pow
theorem Finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even {α β : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing β] {f : α → β}
[DecidablePred fun x => f x ≤ 0] {s : Finset α} (h0 : Even (s.filter fun x => f x ≤ 0).card) :
0 ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
calc
0 ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, (if f x ≤ 0 then (-1 : β) else 1) * f x :=
Finset.prod_nonneg fun x _ => by
split_ifs with hx
· simp [hx]
simp? at hx ⊢ says simp only [not_le, one_mul] at hx ⊢
exact le_of_lt hx
_ = _ := by
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_ite, Finset.prod_const_one, mul_one,
Finset.prod_const, neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, Nat.even_iff.1 h0, pow_zero, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even Finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even
theorem int_prod_range_nonneg (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (hn : Even n) :
0 ≤ ∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, (m - k) := by
rcases hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
induction' n with n ihn
· simp
rw [← two_mul] at ihn
rw [← two_mul, mul_add, mul_one, ← one_add_one_eq_two, ← add_assoc,
Finset.prod_range_succ, Finset.prod_range_succ, mul_assoc]
refine mul_nonneg ihn ?_; generalize (1 + 1) * n = k
rcases le_or_lt m k with hmk | hmk
· have : m ≤ k + 1 := hmk.trans (lt_add_one (k : ℤ)).le
convert mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos_of_le hmk) _
convert sub_nonpos_of_le this
· exact mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le hmk.le) (sub_nonneg_of_le hmk)
#align int_prod_range_nonneg int_prod_range_nonneg
theorem int_prod_range_pos {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) (hm : m ∉ Ico (0 : ℤ) n) :
0 < ∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, (m - k) := by
refine (int_prod_range_nonneg m n hn).lt_of_ne fun h => hm ?_
rw [eq_comm, Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff] at h
obtain ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 h]
exact ⟨Int.ofNat_zero_le _, Int.ofNat_lt.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 ha⟩
#align int_prod_range_pos int_prod_range_pos
theorem strictConvexOn_zpow {m : ℤ} (hm₀ : m ≠ 0) (hm₁ : m ≠ 1) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) fun x : ℝ => x ^ m := by
apply strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos' (convex_Ioi 0)
· exact (continuousOn_zpow₀ m).mono fun x hx => ne_of_gt hx
intro x hx
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [iter_deriv_zpow]
refine mul_pos ?_ (zpow_pos_of_pos hx _)
norm_cast
refine int_prod_range_pos (by decide) fun hm => ?_
rw [← Finset.coe_Ico] at hm
norm_cast at hm
fin_cases hm <;> simp_all -- Porting note: `simp_all` was `cc`
#align strict_convex_on_zpow strictConvexOn_zpow
section SqrtMulLog
theorem hasDerivAt_sqrt_mul_log {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun x => √x * log x) ((2 + log x) / (2 * √x)) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_sqrt hx).mul (hasDerivAt_log hx) using 1
rw [add_div, div_mul_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero, ← div_eq_mul_inv, sqrt_div_self', add_comm,
one_div, one_div, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
#align has_deriv_at_sqrt_mul_log hasDerivAt_sqrt_mul_log
theorem deriv_sqrt_mul_log (x : ℝ) :
deriv (fun x => √x * log x) x = (2 + log x) / (2 * √x) := by
cases' lt_or_le 0 x with hx hx
· exact (hasDerivAt_sqrt_mul_log hx.ne').deriv
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx, mul_zero, div_zero]
refine HasDerivWithinAt.deriv_eq_zero ?_ (uniqueDiffOn_Iic 0 x hx)
refine (hasDerivWithinAt_const x _ 0).congr_of_mem (fun x hx => ?_) hx
rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx, zero_mul]
#align deriv_sqrt_mul_log deriv_sqrt_mul_log
theorem deriv_sqrt_mul_log' :
(deriv fun x => √x * log x) = fun x => (2 + log x) / (2 * √x) :=
funext deriv_sqrt_mul_log
#align deriv_sqrt_mul_log' deriv_sqrt_mul_log'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/SpecificFunctions/Deriv.lean | 137 | 151 | theorem deriv2_sqrt_mul_log (x : ℝ) :
deriv^[2] (fun x => √x * log x) x = -log x / (4 * √x ^ 3) := by |
simp only [Nat.iterate, deriv_sqrt_mul_log']
rcases le_or_lt x 0 with hx | hx
· rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx, zero_pow three_ne_zero, mul_zero, div_zero]
refine HasDerivWithinAt.deriv_eq_zero ?_ (uniqueDiffOn_Iic 0 x hx)
refine (hasDerivWithinAt_const _ _ 0).congr_of_mem (fun x hx => ?_) hx
rw [sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos hx, mul_zero, div_zero]
· have h₀ : √x ≠ 0 := sqrt_ne_zero'.2 hx
convert (((hasDerivAt_log hx.ne').const_add 2).div ((hasDerivAt_sqrt hx.ne').const_mul 2) <|
mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero h₀).deriv using 1
nth_rw 3 [← mul_self_sqrt hx.le]
generalize √x = sqx at h₀ -- else field_simp rewrites sqrt x * sqrt x back to x
field_simp
ring
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.ZPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Deriv
#align_import analysis.convex.specific_functions.deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a16665637b378379689c566204817ae792ac8b39"
open Real Set
open scoped NNReal
theorem strictConvexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : StrictConvexOn ℝ (Ici 0) fun x : ℝ => x ^ n := by
apply StrictMonoOn.strictConvexOn_of_deriv (convex_Ici _) (continuousOn_pow _)
rw [deriv_pow', interior_Ici]
exact fun x (hx : 0 < x) y _ hxy => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
(pow_lt_pow_left hxy hx.le <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt hn) (by positivity)
#align strict_convex_on_pow strictConvexOn_pow
theorem Even.strictConvexOn_pow {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) (h : n ≠ 0) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ Set.univ fun x : ℝ => x ^ n := by
apply StrictMono.strictConvexOn_univ_of_deriv (continuous_pow n)
rw [deriv_pow']
replace h := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
exact StrictMono.const_mul (Odd.strictMono_pow <| Nat.Even.sub_odd h hn <| Nat.odd_iff.2 rfl)
(Nat.cast_pos.2 h)
#align even.strict_convex_on_pow Even.strictConvexOn_pow
theorem Finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even {α β : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing β] {f : α → β}
[DecidablePred fun x => f x ≤ 0] {s : Finset α} (h0 : Even (s.filter fun x => f x ≤ 0).card) :
0 ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
calc
0 ≤ ∏ x ∈ s, (if f x ≤ 0 then (-1 : β) else 1) * f x :=
Finset.prod_nonneg fun x _ => by
split_ifs with hx
· simp [hx]
simp? at hx ⊢ says simp only [not_le, one_mul] at hx ⊢
exact le_of_lt hx
_ = _ := by
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Finset.prod_ite, Finset.prod_const_one, mul_one,
Finset.prod_const, neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two, Nat.even_iff.1 h0, pow_zero, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even Finset.prod_nonneg_of_card_nonpos_even
theorem int_prod_range_nonneg (m : ℤ) (n : ℕ) (hn : Even n) :
0 ≤ ∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, (m - k) := by
rcases hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
induction' n with n ihn
· simp
rw [← two_mul] at ihn
rw [← two_mul, mul_add, mul_one, ← one_add_one_eq_two, ← add_assoc,
Finset.prod_range_succ, Finset.prod_range_succ, mul_assoc]
refine mul_nonneg ihn ?_; generalize (1 + 1) * n = k
rcases le_or_lt m k with hmk | hmk
· have : m ≤ k + 1 := hmk.trans (lt_add_one (k : ℤ)).le
convert mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos_of_le hmk) _
convert sub_nonpos_of_le this
· exact mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le hmk.le) (sub_nonneg_of_le hmk)
#align int_prod_range_nonneg int_prod_range_nonneg
theorem int_prod_range_pos {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : Even n) (hm : m ∉ Ico (0 : ℤ) n) :
0 < ∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, (m - k) := by
refine (int_prod_range_nonneg m n hn).lt_of_ne fun h => hm ?_
rw [eq_comm, Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff] at h
obtain ⟨a, ha, h⟩ := h
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 h]
exact ⟨Int.ofNat_zero_le _, Int.ofNat_lt.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 ha⟩
#align int_prod_range_pos int_prod_range_pos
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/SpecificFunctions/Deriv.lean | 98 | 110 | theorem strictConvexOn_zpow {m : ℤ} (hm₀ : m ≠ 0) (hm₁ : m ≠ 1) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ (Ioi 0) fun x : ℝ => x ^ m := by |
apply strictConvexOn_of_deriv2_pos' (convex_Ioi 0)
· exact (continuousOn_zpow₀ m).mono fun x hx => ne_of_gt hx
intro x hx
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [iter_deriv_zpow]
refine mul_pos ?_ (zpow_pos_of_pos hx _)
norm_cast
refine int_prod_range_pos (by decide) fun hm => ?_
rw [← Finset.coe_Ico] at hm
norm_cast at hm
fin_cases hm <;> simp_all -- Porting note: `simp_all` was `cc`
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.determinant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c3019c79074b0619edb4b27553a91b2e82242395"
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
open Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
#align matrix.det_row_alternating Matrix.detRowAlternating
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
#align matrix.det Matrix.det
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
#align matrix.det_apply Matrix.det_apply
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
#align matrix.det_apply' Matrix.det_apply'
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
cases' not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2) with x h3
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
#align matrix.det_diagonal Matrix.det_diagonal
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
#align matrix.det_zero Matrix.det_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
#align matrix.det_one Matrix.det_one
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
#align matrix.det_is_empty Matrix.det_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
ext
exact det_isEmpty
#align matrix.coe_det_is_empty Matrix.coe_det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 0) : det A = 1 :=
haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
det_isEmpty
#align matrix.det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero Matrix.det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_unique {n : Type*} [Unique n] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) :
det A = A default default := by simp [det_apply, univ_unique]
#align matrix.det_unique Matrix.det_unique
theorem det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n R) (k : n) :
det A = A k k := by
have := uniqueOfSubsingleton k
convert det_unique A
#align matrix.det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton Matrix.det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton
theorem det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) (k : n) :
det A = A k k :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
#align matrix.det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one Matrix.det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one
theorem det_mul_aux {M N : Matrix n n R} {p : n → n} (H : ¬Bijective p) :
(∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ x, M (σ x) (p x) * N (p x) x) = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, j, hpij, hij⟩ : ∃ i j, p i = p j ∧ i ≠ j := by
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_bijective, Injective] at H
push_neg at H
exact H
exact
sum_involution (fun σ _ => σ * Equiv.swap i j)
(fun σ _ => by
have : (∏ x, M (σ x) (p x)) = ∏ x, M ((σ * Equiv.swap i j) x) (p x) :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (swap i j) _ _ (by simp [apply_swap_eq_self hpij])
simp [this, sign_swap hij, -sign_swap', prod_mul_distrib])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr mul_swap_eq_iff).mpr hij) (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun σ _ =>
mul_swap_involutive i j σ
#align matrix.det_mul_aux Matrix.det_mul_aux
@[simp]
theorem det_mul (M N : Matrix n n R) : det (M * N) = det M * det N :=
calc
det (M * N) = ∑ p : n → n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
simp only [det_apply', mul_apply, prod_univ_sum, mul_sum, Fintype.piFinset_univ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ =
∑ p ∈ (@univ (n → n) _).filter Bijective,
∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i :=
(Eq.symm <|
sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun f _ hbij =>
det_mul_aux <| by simpa only [true_and_iff, mem_filter, mem_univ] using hbij)
_ = ∑ τ : Perm n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (τ i) * N (τ i) i :=
sum_bij (fun p h ↦ Equiv.ofBijective p (mem_filter.1 h).2) (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _)
(fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ by injection h)
(fun b _ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _, b.bijective⟩, coe_fn_injective rfl⟩) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * ε τ * ∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j) := by
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * (ε σ * ε τ) * ∏ i, M (τ i) i :=
(sum_congr rfl fun σ _ =>
Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.mulRight σ⁻¹) _ _ fun τ => by
have : (∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j)) = ∏ j, M ((τ * σ⁻¹) j) j := by
rw [← (σ⁻¹ : _ ≃ _).prod_comp]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, apply_inv_self, Function.comp_apply]
have h : ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε τ :=
calc
ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε (τ * σ⁻¹ * σ) := by
rw [mul_comm, sign_mul (τ * σ⁻¹)]
simp only [Int.cast_mul, Units.val_mul]
_ = ε τ := by simp only [inv_mul_cancel_right]
simp_rw [Equiv.coe_mulRight, h]
simp only [this])
_ = det M * det N := by
simp only [det_apply', Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
#align matrix.det_mul Matrix.det_mul
def detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →* R where
toFun := det
map_one' := det_one
map_mul' := det_mul
#align matrix.det_monoid_hom Matrix.detMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_detMonoidHom : (detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R → R) = det :=
rfl
#align matrix.coe_det_monoid_hom Matrix.coe_detMonoidHom
theorem det_mul_comm (M N : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
#align matrix.det_mul_comm Matrix.det_mul_comm
theorem det_mul_left_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * (N * P)) = det (N * (M * P)) := by
rw [← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm M N, ← det_mul]
#align matrix.det_mul_left_comm Matrix.det_mul_left_comm
theorem det_mul_right_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N * P) = det (M * P * N) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm N P, ← det_mul]
#align matrix.det_mul_right_comm Matrix.det_mul_right_comm
-- TODO(mathlib4#6607): fix elaboration so that the ascription isn't needed
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 209 | 211 | theorem det_units_conj (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det ((M : Matrix _ _ _) * N * (↑M⁻¹ : Matrix _ _ _)) = det N := by |
rw [det_mul_right_comm, Units.mul_inv, one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Image
#align_import data.finset.card from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- TODO: After a lot more work,
-- assert_not_exists OrderedCommMonoid
open Function Multiset Nat
variable {α β R : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
def card (s : Finset α) : ℕ :=
Multiset.card s.1
#align finset.card Finset.card
theorem card_def (s : Finset α) : s.card = Multiset.card s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_def Finset.card_def
@[simp] lemma card_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.card s.1 = s.card := rfl
#align finset.card_val Finset.card_val
@[simp]
theorem card_mk {m nodup} : (⟨m, nodup⟩ : Finset α).card = Multiset.card m :=
rfl
#align finset.card_mk Finset.card_mk
@[simp]
theorem card_empty : card (∅ : Finset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.card_empty Finset.card_empty
@[gcongr]
theorem card_le_card : s ⊆ t → s.card ≤ t.card :=
Multiset.card_le_card ∘ val_le_iff.mpr
#align finset.card_le_of_subset Finset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := by apply card_le_card
#align finset.card_mono Finset.card_mono
@[simp] lemma card_eq_zero : s.card = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := card_eq_zero.trans val_eq_zero
lemma card_ne_zero : s.card ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := card_eq_zero.ne.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
lemma card_pos : 0 < s.card ↔ s.Nonempty := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_ne_zero
#align finset.card_eq_zero Finset.card_eq_zero
#align finset.card_pos Finset.card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_pos⟩ := card_pos
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.card_ne_zero⟩ := card_ne_zero
#align finset.nonempty.card_pos Finset.Nonempty.card_pos
theorem card_ne_zero_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s.card ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr card_eq_zero).2 <| ne_empty_of_mem h
#align finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem Finset.card_ne_zero_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Finset α) = 1 :=
Multiset.card_singleton _
#align finset.card_singleton Finset.card_singleton
theorem card_singleton_inter [DecidableEq α] : ({a} ∩ s).card ≤ 1 := by
cases' Finset.decidableMem a s with h h
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
· simp [Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_singleton_inter Finset.card_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).card = s.card + 1 :=
Multiset.card_cons _ _
#align finset.card_cons Finset.card_cons
section InsertErase
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem card_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).card = s.card + 1 := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h, card_cons]
#align finset.card_insert_of_not_mem Finset.card_insert_of_not_mem
theorem card_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : card (insert a s) = s.card := by rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align finset.card_insert_of_mem Finset.card_insert_of_mem
theorem card_insert_le (a : α) (s : Finset α) : card (insert a s) ≤ s.card + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
exact Nat.le_succ _
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.card_insert_le Finset.card_insert_le
section
variable {a b c d e f : α}
theorem card_le_two : card {a, b} ≤ 2 := card_insert_le _ _
theorem card_le_three : card {a, b, c} ≤ 3 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_two)
theorem card_le_four : card {a, b, c, d} ≤ 4 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_three)
theorem card_le_five : card {a, b, c, d, e} ≤ 5 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_four)
theorem card_le_six : card {a, b, c, d, e, f} ≤ 6 :=
(card_insert_le _ _).trans (Nat.succ_le_succ card_le_five)
end
theorem card_insert_eq_ite : card (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.card else s.card + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [card_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [card_insert_of_not_mem h, if_neg h]
#align finset.card_insert_eq_ite Finset.card_insert_eq_ite
@[simp]
theorem card_pair_eq_one_or_two : ({a,b} : Finset α).card = 1 ∨ ({a,b} : Finset α).card = 2 := by
simp [card_insert_eq_ite]
tauto
@[simp]
theorem card_pair (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Finset α).card = 2 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
#align finset.card_doubleton Finset.card_pair
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-04")] alias card_doubleton := Finset.card_pair
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card = s.card - 1 :=
Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
#align finset.card_erase_of_mem Finset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem cast_card_erase_of_mem {R} [AddGroupWithOne R] {s : Finset α} (hs : a ∈ s) :
((s.erase a).card : R) = s.card - 1 := by
rw [card_erase_of_mem hs, Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rw [Nat.add_one_le_iff, Finset.card_pos]
exact ⟨a, hs⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card + 1 = s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_add_one
#align finset.card_erase_add_one Finset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem : a ∈ s → (s.erase a).card < s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
#align finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le : (s.erase a).card ≤ s.card :=
Multiset.card_erase_le
#align finset.card_erase_le Finset.card_erase_le
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Card.lean | 190 | 194 | theorem pred_card_le_card_erase : s.card - 1 ≤ (s.erase a).card := by |
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· exact (card_erase_of_mem h).ge
· rw [erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
exact Nat.sub_le _ _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Finite.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.mv_polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
open Set LinearMap Submodule
open Polynomial
universe u v
variable (σ : Type u) (R : Type v) [CommSemiring R] (p m : ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
section Degree
variable {σ}
def restrictSupport (s : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.supported _ _ s
def basisRestrictSupport (s : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)) : Basis s R (restrictSupport R s) where
repr := Finsupp.supportedEquivFinsupp s
theorem restrictSupport_mono {s t : Set (σ →₀ ℕ)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
restrictSupport R s ≤ restrictSupport R t := Finsupp.supported_mono h
variable (σ)
def restrictTotalDegree (m : ℕ) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
restrictSupport R { n | (n.sum fun _ e => e) ≤ m }
#align mv_polynomial.restrict_total_degree MvPolynomial.restrictTotalDegree
def restrictDegree (m : ℕ) : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
restrictSupport R { n | ∀ i, n i ≤ m }
#align mv_polynomial.restrict_degree MvPolynomial.restrictDegree
variable {R}
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 107 | 110 | theorem mem_restrictTotalDegree (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p ∈ restrictTotalDegree σ R m ↔ p.totalDegree ≤ m := by |
rw [totalDegree, Finset.sup_le_iff]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.QuadraticForm.IsometryEquiv
suppress_compilation
universe uR uM₁ uM₂ uM₃ uM₄
variable {R : Type uR} {M₁ : Type uM₁} {M₂ : Type uM₂} {M₃ : Type uM₃} {M₄ : Type uM₄}
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace QuadraticForm
variable [CommRing R]
variable [AddCommGroup M₁] [AddCommGroup M₂] [AddCommGroup M₃] [AddCommGroup M₄]
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M₃] [Module R M₄] [Invertible (2 : R)]
@[simp]
theorem tmul_comp_tensorMap
{Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁} {Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂}
{Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃} {Q₄ : QuadraticForm R M₄}
(f : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂) (g : Q₃ →qᵢ Q₄) :
(Q₂.tmul Q₄).comp (TensorProduct.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap) = Q₁.tmul Q₃ := by
have h₁ : Q₁ = Q₂.comp f.toLinearMap := QuadraticForm.ext fun x => (f.map_app x).symm
have h₃ : Q₃ = Q₄.comp g.toLinearMap := QuadraticForm.ext fun x => (g.map_app x).symm
refine (QuadraticForm.associated_rightInverse R).injective ?_
ext m₁ m₃ m₁' m₃'
simp [-associated_apply, h₁, h₃, associated_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem tmul_tensorMap_apply
{Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁} {Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂}
{Q₃ : QuadraticForm R M₃} {Q₄ : QuadraticForm R M₄}
(f : Q₁ →qᵢ Q₂) (g : Q₃ →qᵢ Q₄) (x : M₁ ⊗[R] M₃) :
Q₂.tmul Q₄ (TensorProduct.map f.toLinearMap g.toLinearMap x) = Q₁.tmul Q₃ x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (tmul_comp_tensorMap f g) x
section tensorComm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/TensorProduct/Isometries.lean | 79 | 85 | theorem tmul_comp_tensorComm (Q₁ : QuadraticForm R M₁) (Q₂ : QuadraticForm R M₂) :
(Q₂.tmul Q₁).comp (TensorProduct.comm R M₁ M₂) = Q₁.tmul Q₂ := by |
refine (QuadraticForm.associated_rightInverse R).injective ?_
ext m₁ m₂ m₁' m₂'
dsimp [-associated_apply]
simp only [associated_tmul, QuadraticForm.associated_comp]
exact mul_comm _ _
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.NormedSpace
#align_import analysis.mellin_transform from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"917c3c072e487b3cccdbfeff17e75b40e45f66cb"
open MeasureTheory Set Filter Asymptotics TopologicalSpace
open Real
open Complex hiding exp log abs_of_nonneg
open scoped Topology
noncomputable section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
section MellinConvergent
theorem mellin_convergent_iff_norm [NormedSpace ℂ E] {f : ℝ → E} {T : Set ℝ} (hT : T ⊆ Ioi 0)
(hT' : MeasurableSet T) (hfc : AEStronglyMeasurable f <| volume.restrict <| Ioi 0) {s : ℂ} :
IntegrableOn (fun t : ℝ => (t : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) • f t) T ↔
IntegrableOn (fun t : ℝ => t ^ (s.re - 1) * ‖f t‖) T := by
have : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t : ℝ => (t : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) • f t) (volume.restrict T) := by
refine ((ContinuousAt.continuousOn ?_).aestronglyMeasurable hT').smul (hfc.mono_set hT)
exact fun t ht => continuousAt_ofReal_cpow_const _ _ (Or.inr <| ne_of_gt (hT ht))
rw [IntegrableOn, ← integrable_norm_iff this, ← IntegrableOn]
refine integrableOn_congr_fun (fun t ht => ?_) hT'
simp_rw [norm_smul, Complex.norm_eq_abs, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (hT ht), sub_re, one_re]
#align mellin_convergent_iff_norm mellin_convergent_iff_norm
| Mathlib/Analysis/MellinTransform.lean | 210 | 231 | theorem mellin_convergent_top_of_isBigO {f : ℝ → ℝ}
(hfc : AEStronglyMeasurable f <| volume.restrict (Ioi 0)) {a s : ℝ}
(hf : f =O[atTop] (· ^ (-a))) (hs : s < a) :
∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ IntegrableOn (fun t : ℝ => t ^ (s - 1) * f t) (Ioi c) := by |
obtain ⟨d, hd'⟩ := hf.isBigOWith
simp_rw [IsBigOWith, eventually_atTop] at hd'
obtain ⟨e, he⟩ := hd'
have he' : 0 < max e 1 := zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _)
refine ⟨max e 1, he', ?_, ?_⟩
· refine AEStronglyMeasurable.mul ?_ (hfc.mono_set (Ioi_subset_Ioi he'.le))
refine (ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun t ht => ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioi
exact continuousAt_rpow_const _ _ (Or.inl <| (he'.trans ht).ne')
· have : ∀ᵐ t : ℝ ∂volume.restrict (Ioi <| max e 1),
‖t ^ (s - 1) * f t‖ ≤ t ^ (s - 1 + -a) * d := by
refine (ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioi).mono fun t ht => ?_
have ht' : 0 < t := he'.trans ht
rw [norm_mul, rpow_add ht', ← norm_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg ht'.le (-a)), mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ d, norm_of_nonneg (rpow_nonneg ht'.le _)]
gcongr
exact he t ((le_max_left e 1).trans_lt ht).le
refine (HasFiniteIntegral.mul_const ?_ _).mono' this
exact (integrableOn_Ioi_rpow_of_lt (by linarith) he').hasFiniteIntegral
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.MonoOver
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
#align_import category_theory.subobject.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
def Subobject (X : C) :=
ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X)
#align category_theory.subobject CategoryTheory.Subobject
instance (X : C) : PartialOrder (Subobject X) := by
dsimp only [Subobject]
infer_instance
namespace Subobject
-- Porting note: made it a def rather than an abbreviation
-- because Lean would make it too transparent
def mk {X A : C} (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject X :=
(toThinSkeleton _).obj (MonoOver.mk' f)
#align category_theory.subobject.mk CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk
section
attribute [local ext] CategoryTheory.Comma
protected theorem ind {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], p (Subobject.mk f)) (P : Subobject X) : p P := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn'
intro a
exact h a.arrow
#align category_theory.subobject.ind CategoryTheory.Subobject.ind
protected theorem ind₂ {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g],
p (Subobject.mk f) (Subobject.mk g))
(P Q : Subobject X) : p P Q := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn₂'
intro a b
exact h a.arrow b.arrow
#align category_theory.subobject.ind₂ CategoryTheory.Subobject.ind₂
end
protected def lift {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α)
(h :
∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A ≅ B),
i.hom ≫ g = f → F f = F g) :
Subobject X → α := fun P =>
Quotient.liftOn' P (fun m => F m.arrow) fun m n ⟨i⟩ =>
h m.arrow n.arrow ((MonoOver.forget X ⋙ Over.forget X).mapIso i) (Over.w i.hom)
#align category_theory.subobject.lift CategoryTheory.Subobject.lift
@[simp]
protected theorem lift_mk {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α) {h A}
(f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject.lift F h (Subobject.mk f) = F f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subobject.lift_mk CategoryTheory.Subobject.lift_mk
noncomputable def equivMonoOver (X : C) : Subobject X ≌ MonoOver X :=
ThinSkeleton.equivalence _
#align category_theory.subobject.equiv_mono_over CategoryTheory.Subobject.equivMonoOver
noncomputable def representative {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ MonoOver X :=
(equivMonoOver X).functor
#align category_theory.subobject.representative CategoryTheory.Subobject.representative
noncomputable def representativeIso {X : C} (A : MonoOver X) :
representative.obj ((toThinSkeleton _).obj A) ≅ A :=
(equivMonoOver X).counitIso.app A
#align category_theory.subobject.representative_iso CategoryTheory.Subobject.representativeIso
noncomputable def underlying {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ C :=
representative ⋙ MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _
#align category_theory.subobject.underlying CategoryTheory.Subobject.underlying
instance : CoeOut (Subobject X) C where coe Y := underlying.obj Y
-- Porting note: removed as it has become a syntactic tautology
-- @[simp]
-- theorem underlying_as_coe {X : C} (P : Subobject X) : underlying.obj P = P :=
-- rfl
-- #align category_theory.subobject.underlying_as_coe CategoryTheory.Subobject.underlying_as_coe
noncomputable def underlyingIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : (Subobject.mk f : C) ≅ X :=
(MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _).mapIso (representativeIso (MonoOver.mk' f))
#align category_theory.subobject.underlying_iso CategoryTheory.Subobject.underlyingIso
noncomputable def arrow {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : (Y : C) ⟶ X :=
(representative.obj Y).obj.hom
#align category_theory.subobject.arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.arrow
instance arrow_mono {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : Mono Y.arrow :=
(representative.obj Y).property
#align category_theory.subobject.arrow_mono CategoryTheory.Subobject.arrow_mono
@[simp]
theorem arrow_congr {A : C} (X Y : Subobject A) (h : X = Y) :
eqToHom (congr_arg (fun X : Subobject A => (X : C)) h) ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow := by
induction h
simp
#align category_theory.subobject.arrow_congr CategoryTheory.Subobject.arrow_congr
@[simp]
theorem representative_coe (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y : C) = (Y : C) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subobject.representative_coe CategoryTheory.Subobject.representative_coe
@[simp]
theorem representative_arrow (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y).arrow = Y.arrow :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subobject.representative_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.representative_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlying_arrow {X : C} {Y Z : Subobject X} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
underlying.map f ≫ arrow Z = arrow Y :=
Over.w (representative.map f)
#align category_theory.subobject.underlying_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.underlying_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_arrow {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ (Subobject.mk f).arrow = f :=
Over.w _
#align category_theory.subobject.underlying_iso_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.underlyingIso_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).hom ≫ f = (mk f).arrow :=
(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).1 (underlyingIso_arrow f).symm
#align category_theory.subobject.underlying_iso_hom_comp_eq_mk CategoryTheory.Subobject.underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_comp_arrow_eq {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} {f g : X ⟶ P}
(h : f ≫ P.arrow = g ≫ P.arrow) : f = g :=
(cancel_mono P.arrow).mp h
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_of_comp_arrow_eq CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_of_comp_arrow_eq
theorem mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂] (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
(w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) : mk f₁ ≤ mk f₂ :=
⟨MonoOver.homMk _ w⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm
@[simp]
theorem mk_arrow (P : Subobject X) : mk P.arrow = P :=
Quotient.inductionOn' P fun Q => by
obtain ⟨e⟩ := @Quotient.mk_out' _ (isIsomorphicSetoid _) Q
exact Quotient.sound' ⟨MonoOver.isoMk (Iso.refl _) ≪≫ e⟩
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_arrow
theorem le_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C)) (w : f ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) :
X ≤ Y := by
convert mk_le_mk_of_comm _ w <;> simp
#align category_theory.subobject.le_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.le_of_comm
theorem le_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : (X : C) ⟶ A)
(w : g ≫ f = X.arrow) : X ≤ mk f :=
le_of_comm (g ≫ (underlyingIso f).inv) <| by simp [w]
#align category_theory.subobject.le_mk_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.le_mk_of_comm
theorem mk_le_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : A ⟶ (X : C))
(w : g ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f ≤ X :=
le_of_comm ((underlyingIso f).hom ≫ g) <| by simp [w]
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_le_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_le_of_comm
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ≅ (Y : C))
(w : f.hom ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) : X = Y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_comm f.hom w) <| le_of_comm f.inv <| f.inv_comp_eq.2 w.symm
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_of_comm
-- Porting note (#11182): removed @[ext]
theorem eq_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : (X : C) ≅ A)
(w : i.hom ≫ f = X.arrow) : X = mk f :=
eq_of_comm (i.trans (underlyingIso f).symm) <| by simp [w]
#align category_theory.subobject.eq_mk_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.eq_mk_of_comm
-- Porting note (#11182): removed @[ext]
theorem mk_eq_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : A ≅ (X : C))
(w : i.hom ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f = X :=
Eq.symm <| eq_mk_of_comm _ i.symm <| by rw [Iso.symm_hom, Iso.inv_comp_eq, w]
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_eq_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_eq_of_comm
-- Porting note (#11182): removed @[ext]
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A₁ ≅ A₂)
(w : i.hom ≫ g = f) : mk f = mk g :=
eq_mk_of_comm _ ((underlyingIso f).trans i) <| by simp [w]
#align category_theory.subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm
-- We make `X` and `Y` explicit arguments here so that when `ofLE` appears in goal statements
-- it is possible to see its source and target
-- (`h` will just display as `_`, because it is in `Prop`).
def ofLE {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C) :=
underlying.map <| h.hom
#align category_theory.subobject.of_le CategoryTheory.Subobject.ofLE
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_arrow {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (h : X ≤ Y) : ofLE X Y h ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow :=
underlying_arrow _
#align category_theory.subobject.of_le_arrow CategoryTheory.Subobject.ofLE_arrow
instance {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : Mono (ofLE X Y h) := by
fconstructor
intro Z f g w
replace w := w =≫ Y.arrow
ext
simpa using w
theorem ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂]
(g : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) :
ofLE _ _ (mk_le_mk_of_comm g w) = (underlyingIso _).hom ≫ g ≫ (underlyingIso _).inv := by
ext
simp [w]
#align category_theory.subobject.of_le_mk_le_mk_of_comm CategoryTheory.Subobject.ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm
def ofLEMk {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) : (X : C) ⟶ A :=
ofLE X (mk f) h ≫ (underlyingIso f).hom
#align category_theory.subobject.of_le_mk CategoryTheory.Subobject.ofLEMk
instance {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) :
Mono (ofLEMk X f h) := by
dsimp only [ofLEMk]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofLEMk_comp {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) :
ofLEMk X f h ≫ f = X.arrow := by simp [ofLEMk]
#align category_theory.subobject.of_le_mk_comp CategoryTheory.Subobject.ofLEMk_comp
def ofMkLE {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f ≤ X) : A ⟶ (X : C) :=
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ ofLE (mk f) X h
#align category_theory.subobject.of_mk_le CategoryTheory.Subobject.ofMkLE
instance {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f ≤ X) :
Mono (ofMkLE f X h) := by
dsimp only [ofMkLE]
infer_instance
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Basic.lean | 364 | 365 | theorem ofMkLE_arrow {B A : C} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] {X : Subobject B} (h : mk f ≤ X) :
ofMkLE f X h ≫ X.arrow = f := by | simp [ofMkLE]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Clique
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Partition
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.coloring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open Fintype Function
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {n : ℕ}
abbrev Coloring (α : Type v) := G →g (⊤ : SimpleGraph α)
#align simple_graph.coloring SimpleGraph.Coloring
variable {G} {α β : Type*} (C : G.Coloring α)
theorem Coloring.valid {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) : C v ≠ C w :=
C.map_rel h
#align simple_graph.coloring.valid SimpleGraph.Coloring.valid
@[match_pattern]
def Coloring.mk (color : V → α) (valid : ∀ {v w : V}, G.Adj v w → color v ≠ color w) :
G.Coloring α :=
⟨color, @valid⟩
#align simple_graph.coloring.mk SimpleGraph.Coloring.mk
def Coloring.colorClass (c : α) : Set V := { v : V | C v = c }
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_class SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClass
def Coloring.colorClasses : Set (Set V) := (Setoid.ker C).classes
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClasses
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClass (v : V) : v ∈ C.colorClass (C v) := rfl
#align simple_graph.coloring.mem_color_class SimpleGraph.Coloring.mem_colorClass
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition : Setoid.IsPartition C.colorClasses :=
Setoid.isPartition_classes (Setoid.ker C)
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes_is_partition SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClasses_isPartition
theorem Coloring.mem_colorClasses {v : V} : C.colorClass (C v) ∈ C.colorClasses :=
⟨v, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.coloring.mem_color_classes SimpleGraph.Coloring.mem_colorClasses
theorem Coloring.colorClasses_finite [Finite α] : C.colorClasses.Finite :=
Setoid.finite_classes_ker _
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes_finite SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorClasses_finite
theorem Coloring.card_colorClasses_le [Fintype α] [Fintype C.colorClasses] :
Fintype.card C.colorClasses ≤ Fintype.card α := by
simp [colorClasses]
-- Porting note: brute force instance declaration `[Fintype (Setoid.classes (Setoid.ker C))]`
haveI : Fintype (Setoid.classes (Setoid.ker C)) := by assumption
convert Setoid.card_classes_ker_le C
#align simple_graph.coloring.card_color_classes_le SimpleGraph.Coloring.card_colorClasses_le
theorem Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass {c : α} {v w : V} (hv : v ∈ C.colorClass c)
(hw : w ∈ C.colorClass c) : ¬G.Adj v w := fun h => C.valid h (Eq.trans hv (Eq.symm hw))
#align simple_graph.coloring.not_adj_of_mem_color_class SimpleGraph.Coloring.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass
theorem Coloring.color_classes_independent (c : α) : IsAntichain G.Adj (C.colorClass c) :=
fun _ hv _ hw _ => C.not_adj_of_mem_colorClass hv hw
#align simple_graph.coloring.color_classes_independent SimpleGraph.Coloring.color_classes_independent
-- TODO make this computable
noncomputable instance [Fintype V] [Fintype α] : Fintype (Coloring G α) := by
classical
change Fintype (RelHom G.Adj (⊤ : SimpleGraph α).Adj)
apply Fintype.ofInjective _ RelHom.coe_fn_injective
variable (G)
def Colorable (n : ℕ) : Prop := Nonempty (G.Coloring (Fin n))
#align simple_graph.colorable SimpleGraph.Colorable
def coloringOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty V] : G.Coloring α :=
Coloring.mk isEmptyElim fun {v} => isEmptyElim v
#align simple_graph.coloring_of_is_empty SimpleGraph.coloringOfIsEmpty
theorem colorable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty V] (n : ℕ) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨G.coloringOfIsEmpty⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable_of_is_empty SimpleGraph.colorable_of_isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_of_colorable_zero (h : G.Colorable 0) : IsEmpty V := by
constructor
intro v
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := h.some v
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ hi
#align simple_graph.is_empty_of_colorable_zero SimpleGraph.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero
def selfColoring : G.Coloring V := Coloring.mk id fun {_ _} => G.ne_of_adj
#align simple_graph.self_coloring SimpleGraph.selfColoring
noncomputable def chromaticNumber : ℕ∞ := ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞)
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_biInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n ∈ setOf G.Colorable, (n : ℕ∞) := rfl
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_iInf {G : SimpleGraph V} :
G.chromaticNumber = ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) := by
rw [chromaticNumber, iInf_subtype]
lemma Colorable.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf {G : SimpleGraph V} {n} (h : G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber = sInf {n' : ℕ | G.Colorable n'} := by
rw [ENat.coe_sInf, chromaticNumber]
exact ⟨_, h⟩
def recolorOfEmbedding {α β : Type*} (f : α ↪ β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β where
toFun C := (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C
inj' := by -- this was strangely painful; seems like missing lemmas about embeddings
intro C C' h
dsimp only at h
ext v
apply (Embedding.completeGraph f).inj'
change ((Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp C) v = _
rw [h]
rfl
#align simple_graph.recolor_of_embedding SimpleGraph.recolorOfEmbedding
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfEmbedding f) = (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp := rfl
def recolorOfEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α ≃ β) : G.Coloring α ≃ G.Coloring β where
toFun := G.recolorOfEmbedding f.toEmbedding
invFun := G.recolorOfEmbedding f.symm.toEmbedding
left_inv C := by
ext v
apply Equiv.symm_apply_apply
right_inv C := by
ext v
apply Equiv.apply_symm_apply
#align simple_graph.recolor_of_equiv SimpleGraph.recolorOfEquiv
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfEquiv (f : α ≃ β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfEquiv f) = (Embedding.completeGraph f).toHom.comp := rfl
noncomputable def recolorOfCardLE {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β]
(hn : Fintype.card α ≤ Fintype.card β) : G.Coloring α ↪ G.Coloring β :=
G.recolorOfEmbedding <| (Function.Embedding.nonempty_of_card_le hn).some
#align simple_graph.recolor_of_card_le SimpleGraph.recolorOfCardLE
@[simp] lemma coe_recolorOfCardLE [Fintype α] [Fintype β] (hαβ : card α ≤ card β) :
⇑(G.recolorOfCardLE hαβ) =
(Embedding.completeGraph (Embedding.nonempty_of_card_le hαβ).some).toHom.comp := rfl
variable {G}
theorem Colorable.mono {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) (hc : G.Colorable n) : G.Colorable m :=
⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simp [h]) hc.some⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable.mono SimpleGraph.Colorable.mono
theorem Coloring.colorable [Fintype α] (C : G.Coloring α) : G.Colorable (Fintype.card α) :=
⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simp) C⟩
#align simple_graph.coloring.to_colorable SimpleGraph.Coloring.colorable
theorem colorable_of_fintype (G : SimpleGraph V) [Fintype V] : G.Colorable (Fintype.card V) :=
G.selfColoring.colorable
#align simple_graph.colorable_of_fintype SimpleGraph.colorable_of_fintype
noncomputable def Colorable.toColoring [Fintype α] {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n)
(hn : n ≤ Fintype.card α) : G.Coloring α := by
rw [← Fintype.card_fin n] at hn
exact G.recolorOfCardLE hn hc.some
#align simple_graph.colorable.to_coloring SimpleGraph.Colorable.toColoring
theorem Colorable.of_embedding {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'} (f : G ↪g G') {n : ℕ}
(h : G'.Colorable n) : G.Colorable n :=
⟨(h.toColoring (by simp)).comp f⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable.of_embedding SimpleGraph.Colorable.of_embedding
theorem colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring (n : ℕ) :
G.Colorable n ↔ ∃ C : G.Coloring ℕ, ∀ v, C v < n := by
constructor
· rintro hc
have C : G.Coloring (Fin n) := hc.toColoring (by simp)
let f := Embedding.completeGraph (@Fin.valEmbedding n)
use f.toHom.comp C
intro v
cases' C with color valid
exact Fin.is_lt (color v)
· rintro ⟨C, Cf⟩
refine ⟨Coloring.mk ?_ ?_⟩
· exact fun v => ⟨C v, Cf v⟩
· rintro v w hvw
simp only [Fin.mk_eq_mk, Ne]
exact C.valid hvw
#align simple_graph.colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring SimpleGraph.colorable_iff_exists_bdd_nat_coloring
theorem colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) :
{ n : ℕ | G.Colorable n }.Nonempty :=
⟨n, hc⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable SimpleGraph.colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable
theorem chromaticNumber_bddBelow : BddBelow { n : ℕ | G.Colorable n } :=
⟨0, fun _ _ => zero_le _⟩
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_bdd_below SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_bddBelow
theorem Colorable.chromaticNumber_le {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) : G.chromaticNumber ≤ n := by
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf]
norm_cast
apply csInf_le chromaticNumber_bddBelow
exact hc
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_le_of_colorable SimpleGraph.Colorable.chromaticNumber_le
theorem chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n, G.Colorable n := by
rw [chromaticNumber]
convert_to ⨅ n : {m | G.Colorable m}, (n : ℕ∞) ≠ ⊤ ↔ _
· rw [iInf_subtype]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, ENat.iInf_coe_lt_top]
simp
theorem chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable {n : ℕ} : G.chromaticNumber ≤ n ↔ G.Colorable n := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, Colorable.chromaticNumber_le⟩
have : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤ := (trans h (WithTop.coe_lt_top n)).ne
rw [chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists] at this
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this
rw [hm.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_le] at h
have := Nat.sInf_mem (⟨m, hm⟩ : {n' | G.Colorable n'}.Nonempty)
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at this
exact this.mono h
@[deprecated Colorable.chromaticNumber_le (since := "2024-03-21")]
theorem chromaticNumber_le_card [Fintype α] (C : G.Coloring α) :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ Fintype.card α := C.colorable.chromaticNumber_le
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_le_card SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_le_card
theorem colorable_chromaticNumber {m : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable m) :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
classical
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.sInf_def]
· apply Nat.find_spec
· exact colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable hc
#align simple_graph.colorable_chromatic_number SimpleGraph.colorable_chromaticNumber
theorem colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype (G : SimpleGraph V) [Finite V] :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
cases nonempty_fintype V
exact colorable_chromaticNumber G.colorable_of_fintype
#align simple_graph.colorable_chromatic_number_of_fintype SimpleGraph.colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype
theorem chromaticNumber_le_one_of_subsingleton (G : SimpleGraph V) [Subsingleton V] :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable]
refine ⟨Coloring.mk (fun _ => 0) ?_⟩
intros v w
cases Subsingleton.elim v w
simp
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_le_one_of_subsingleton SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_le_one_of_subsingleton
theorem chromaticNumber_eq_zero_of_isempty (G : SimpleGraph V) [IsEmpty V] :
G.chromaticNumber = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_zero, chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable]
apply colorable_of_isEmpty
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_eq_zero_of_isempty SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_eq_zero_of_isempty
theorem isEmpty_of_chromaticNumber_eq_zero (G : SimpleGraph V) [Finite V]
(h : G.chromaticNumber = 0) : IsEmpty V := by
have h' := G.colorable_chromaticNumber_of_fintype
rw [h] at h'
exact G.isEmpty_of_colorable_zero h'
#align simple_graph.is_empty_of_chromatic_number_eq_zero SimpleGraph.isEmpty_of_chromaticNumber_eq_zero
theorem chromaticNumber_pos [Nonempty V] {n : ℕ} (hc : G.Colorable n) : 0 < G.chromaticNumber := by
rw [hc.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_pos]
apply le_csInf (colorable_set_nonempty_of_colorable hc)
intro m hm
by_contra h'
simp only [not_le] at h'
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hm.some (Classical.arbitrary V)
have h₁: i < 0 := lt_of_lt_of_le hi (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h')
exact Nat.not_lt_zero _ h₁
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_pos SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_pos
theorem colorable_of_chromaticNumber_ne_top (h : G.chromaticNumber ≠ ⊤) :
G.Colorable (ENat.toNat G.chromaticNumber) := by
rw [chromaticNumber_ne_top_iff_exists] at h
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h
exact colorable_chromaticNumber hn
#align simple_graph.colorable_of_chromatic_number_pos SimpleGraph.colorable_of_chromaticNumber_ne_top
theorem Colorable.mono_left {G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') {n : ℕ} (hc : G'.Colorable n) :
G.Colorable n :=
⟨hc.some.comp (Hom.mapSpanningSubgraphs h)⟩
#align simple_graph.colorable.mono_left SimpleGraph.Colorable.mono_left
theorem chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
(h : ∀ n, G'.Colorable n → G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber ≤ G'.chromaticNumber := by
rw [chromaticNumber, chromaticNumber]
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf_iff]
intro m hc
have := h _ hc
rw [← chromaticNumber_le_iff_colorable] at this
exact this
#align simple_graph.colorable.chromatic_number_le_of_forall_imp SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp
theorem chromaticNumber_mono (G' : SimpleGraph V)
(h : G ≤ G') : G.chromaticNumber ≤ G'.chromaticNumber :=
chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp fun _ => Colorable.mono_left h
#align simple_graph.colorable.chromatic_number_mono SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_mono
theorem chromaticNumber_mono_of_embedding {V' : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
(f : G ↪g G') : G.chromaticNumber ≤ G'.chromaticNumber :=
chromaticNumber_le_of_forall_imp fun _ => Colorable.of_embedding f
#align simple_graph.colorable.chromatic_number_mono_of_embedding SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_mono_of_embedding
lemma card_le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective [Fintype α] :
card α ≤ G.chromaticNumber ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring α, Surjective C := by
refine ⟨fun h C ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [C.colorable.chromaticNumber_eq_sInf, Nat.cast_le] at h
intro i
by_contra! hi
let D : G.Coloring {a // a ≠ i} := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨C v, hi v⟩, (C.valid · <| congr_arg Subtype.val ·)⟩
classical
exact Nat.not_mem_of_lt_sInf ((Nat.pred_lt' <| card_pos_iff.2 ⟨i⟩).trans_le h)
⟨G.recolorOfEquiv (equivOfCardEq <| by simp [Nat.pred_eq_sub_one]) D⟩
· simp only [chromaticNumber, Set.mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf_iff, Nat.cast_le, exists_prop]
rintro i ⟨C⟩
contrapose! h
refine ⟨G.recolorOfCardLE (by simpa using h.le) C, fun hC ↦ ?_⟩
dsimp at hC
simpa [h.not_le] using Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ hC.of_comp
lemma le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective :
n ≤ G.chromaticNumber ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring (Fin n), Surjective C := by
simp [← card_le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective]
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_card_iff_forall_surjective [Fintype α] (hG : G.Colorable (card α)) :
G.chromaticNumber = card α ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring α, Surjective C := by
rw [← hG.chromaticNumber_le.ge_iff_eq, card_le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective]
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_eq_card_of_forall_surj SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_eq_card_iff_forall_surjective
lemma chromaticNumber_eq_iff_forall_surjective (hG : G.Colorable n) :
G.chromaticNumber = n ↔ ∀ C : G.Coloring (Fin n), Surjective C := by
rw [← hG.chromaticNumber_le.ge_iff_eq, le_chromaticNumber_iff_forall_surjective]
theorem chromaticNumber_bot [Nonempty V] : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).chromaticNumber = 1 := by
have : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Colorable 1 := ⟨.mk 0 $ by simp⟩
exact this.chromaticNumber_le.antisymm $ ENat.one_le_iff_pos.2 $ chromaticNumber_pos this
#align simple_graph.chromatic_number_bot SimpleGraph.chromaticNumber_bot
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Coloring.lean | 421 | 428 | theorem chromaticNumber_top [Fintype V] : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).chromaticNumber = Fintype.card V := by |
rw [chromaticNumber_eq_card_iff_forall_surjective (selfColoring _).colorable]
intro C
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_surjective]
intro v w
contrapose
intro h
exact C.valid h
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate
open Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
#align nnreal.rpow NNReal.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_pow NNReal.rpow_eq_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_rpow NNReal.coe_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
#align nnreal.rpow_zero NNReal.rpow_zero
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff NNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
#align nnreal.zero_rpow NNReal.zero_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
#align nnreal.rpow_one NNReal.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
#align nnreal.one_rpow NNReal.one_rpow
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
#align nnreal.rpow_add NNReal.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_add' NNReal.rpow_add'
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
#align nnreal.rpow_mul NNReal.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
#align nnreal.rpow_neg NNReal.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
#align nnreal.rpow_neg_one NNReal.rpow_neg_one
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
#align nnreal.rpow_sub NNReal.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_sub' NNReal.rpow_sub'
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_inv_rpow_self NNReal.rpow_inv_rpow_self
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_self_rpow_inv NNReal.rpow_self_rpow_inv
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
#align nnreal.inv_rpow NNReal.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
#align nnreal.div_rpow NNReal.div_rpow
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
#align nnreal.sqrt_eq_rpow NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
#align nnreal.rpow_nat_cast NNReal.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
#align nnreal.rpow_two NNReal.rpow_two
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
#align nnreal.mul_rpow NNReal.mul_rpow
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 197 | 201 | theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by |
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.normed_space.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
open Metric Set
open Pointwise Topology
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
variable [NormedField 𝕜]
section SeminormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
theorem smul_ball {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : E) (r : ℝ) : c • ball x r = ball (c • x) (‖c‖ * r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hc]
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_smul_smul₀ hc x]
simp [← div_eq_inv_mul, div_lt_iff (norm_pos_iff.2 hc), mul_comm _ r, dist_smul₀]
#align smul_ball smul_ball
theorem smul_unitBall {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) : c • ball (0 : E) (1 : ℝ) = ball (0 : E) ‖c‖ := by
rw [_root_.smul_ball hc, smul_zero, mul_one]
#align smul_unit_ball smul_unitBall
theorem smul_sphere' {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
c • sphere x r = sphere (c • x) (‖c‖ * r) := by
ext y
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hc]
conv_lhs => rw [← inv_smul_smul₀ hc x]
simp only [mem_sphere, dist_smul₀, norm_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_iff (norm_pos_iff.2 hc).ne',
mul_comm r]
#align smul_sphere' smul_sphere'
theorem smul_closedBall' {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
c • closedBall x r = closedBall (c • x) (‖c‖ * r) := by
simp only [← ball_union_sphere, Set.smul_set_union, _root_.smul_ball hc, smul_sphere' hc]
#align smul_closed_ball' smul_closedBall'
theorem set_smul_sphere_zero {s : Set 𝕜} (hs : 0 ∉ s) (r : ℝ) :
s • sphere (0 : E) r = (‖·‖) ⁻¹' ((‖·‖ * r) '' s) :=
calc
s • sphere (0 : E) r = ⋃ c ∈ s, c • sphere (0 : E) r := iUnion_smul_left_image.symm
_ = ⋃ c ∈ s, sphere (0 : E) (‖c‖ * r) := iUnion₂_congr fun c hc ↦ by
rw [smul_sphere' (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc hs), smul_zero]
_ = (‖·‖) ⁻¹' ((‖·‖ * r) '' s) := by ext; simp [eq_comm]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.smul₀ {s : Set E} (hs : IsBounded s) (c : 𝕜) : IsBounded (c • s) :=
(lipschitzWith_smul c).isBounded_image hs
#align metric.bounded.smul Bornology.IsBounded.smul₀
theorem eventually_singleton_add_smul_subset {x : E} {s : Set E} (hs : Bornology.IsBounded s)
{u : Set E} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), {x} + r • s ⊆ u := by
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ closedBall x ε ⊆ u := nhds_basis_closedBall.mem_iff.1 hu
obtain ⟨R, Rpos, hR⟩ : ∃ R : ℝ, 0 < R ∧ s ⊆ closedBall 0 R := hs.subset_closedBall_lt 0 0
have : Metric.closedBall (0 : 𝕜) (ε / R) ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜) := closedBall_mem_nhds _ (div_pos εpos Rpos)
filter_upwards [this] with r hr
simp only [image_add_left, singleton_add]
intro y hy
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z : E, z ∈ s ∧ r • z = -x + y := by simpa [mem_smul_set] using hy
have I : ‖r • z‖ ≤ ε :=
calc
‖r • z‖ = ‖r‖ * ‖z‖ := norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ε / R * R :=
(mul_le_mul (mem_closedBall_zero_iff.1 hr) (mem_closedBall_zero_iff.1 (hR zs))
(norm_nonneg _) (div_pos εpos Rpos).le)
_ = ε := by field_simp
have : y = x + r • z := by simp only [hz, add_neg_cancel_left]
apply hε
simpa only [this, dist_eq_norm, add_sub_cancel_left, mem_closedBall] using I
#align eventually_singleton_add_smul_subset eventually_singleton_add_smul_subset
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {x y z : E} {δ ε : ℝ}
theorem smul_unitBall_of_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : r • ball (0 : E) 1 = ball (0 : E) r := by
rw [smul_unitBall hr.ne', Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le]
#align smul_unit_ball_of_pos smul_unitBall_of_pos
lemma Ioo_smul_sphere_zero {a b r : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hr : 0 < r) :
Ioo a b • sphere (0 : E) r = ball 0 (b * r) \ closedBall 0 (a * r) := by
have : EqOn (‖·‖) id (Ioo a b) := fun x hx ↦ abs_of_pos (ha.trans_lt hx.1)
rw [set_smul_sphere_zero (by simp [ha.not_lt]), ← image_image (· * r), this.image_eq, image_id,
image_mul_right_Ioo _ _ hr]
ext x; simp [and_comm]
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_eq (x z : E) {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hab : a + b = 1) :
∃ y, dist x y = b * dist x z ∧ dist y z = a * dist x z := by
use a • x + b • z
nth_rw 1 [← one_smul ℝ x]
nth_rw 4 [← one_smul ℝ z]
simp [dist_eq_norm, ← hab, add_smul, ← smul_sub, norm_smul_of_nonneg, ha, hb]
#align exists_dist_eq exists_dist_eq
theorem exists_dist_le_le (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (h : dist x z ≤ ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y ≤ δ ∧ dist y z ≤ ε := by
obtain rfl | hε' := hε.eq_or_lt
· exact ⟨z, by rwa [zero_add] at h, (dist_self _).le⟩
have hεδ := add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hε' hδ
refine (exists_dist_eq x z (div_nonneg hε <| add_nonneg hε hδ)
(div_nonneg hδ <| add_nonneg hε hδ) <| by
rw [← add_div, div_self hεδ.ne']).imp
fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy.1, hy.2, div_mul_comm, div_mul_comm ε]
rw [← div_le_one hεδ] at h
exact ⟨mul_le_of_le_one_left hδ h, mul_le_of_le_one_left hε h⟩
#align exists_dist_le_le exists_dist_le_le
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_le_lt (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 < ε) (h : dist x z < ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y ≤ δ ∧ dist y z < ε := by
refine (exists_dist_eq x z (div_nonneg hε.le <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ)
(div_nonneg hδ <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ) <| by
rw [← add_div, div_self (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hε hδ).ne']).imp
fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy.1, hy.2, div_mul_comm, div_mul_comm ε]
rw [← div_lt_one (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hε hδ)] at h
exact ⟨mul_le_of_le_one_left hδ h.le, mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hε h⟩
#align exists_dist_le_lt exists_dist_le_lt
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_lt_le (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (h : dist x z < ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y < δ ∧ dist y z ≤ ε := by
obtain ⟨y, yz, xy⟩ :=
exists_dist_le_lt hε hδ (show dist z x < δ + ε by simpa only [dist_comm, add_comm] using h)
exact ⟨y, by simp [dist_comm x y, dist_comm y z, *]⟩
#align exists_dist_lt_le exists_dist_lt_le
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem exists_dist_lt_lt (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 < ε) (h : dist x z < ε + δ) :
∃ y, dist x y < δ ∧ dist y z < ε := by
refine (exists_dist_eq x z (div_nonneg hε.le <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ.le)
(div_nonneg hδ.le <| add_nonneg hε.le hδ.le) <| by
rw [← add_div, div_self (add_pos hε hδ).ne']).imp
fun y hy => ?_
rw [hy.1, hy.2, div_mul_comm, div_mul_comm ε]
rw [← div_lt_one (add_pos hε hδ)] at h
exact ⟨mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hδ h, mul_lt_of_lt_one_left hε h⟩
#align exists_dist_lt_lt exists_dist_lt_lt
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem disjoint_ball_ball_iff (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 < ε) :
Disjoint (ball x δ) (ball y ε) ↔ δ + ε ≤ dist x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => le_of_not_lt fun hxy => ?_, ball_disjoint_ball⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxy
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_dist_lt_lt hδ hε hxy
rw [dist_comm] at hxz
exact h.le_bot ⟨hxz, hzy⟩
#align disjoint_ball_ball_iff disjoint_ball_ball_iff
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem disjoint_ball_closedBall_iff (hδ : 0 < δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
Disjoint (ball x δ) (closedBall y ε) ↔ δ + ε ≤ dist x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => le_of_not_lt fun hxy => ?_, ball_disjoint_closedBall⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxy
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_dist_lt_le hδ hε hxy
rw [dist_comm] at hxz
exact h.le_bot ⟨hxz, hzy⟩
#align disjoint_ball_closed_ball_iff disjoint_ball_closedBall_iff
-- This is also true for `ℚ`-normed spaces
theorem disjoint_closedBall_ball_iff (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 < ε) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (ball y ε) ↔ δ + ε ≤ dist x y := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_ball_closedBall_iff hε hδ, add_comm, dist_comm]
#align disjoint_closed_ball_ball_iff disjoint_closedBall_ball_iff
theorem disjoint_closedBall_closedBall_iff (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) (hε : 0 ≤ ε) :
Disjoint (closedBall x δ) (closedBall y ε) ↔ δ + ε < dist x y := by
refine ⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge fun hxy => ?_, closedBall_disjoint_closedBall⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxy
obtain ⟨z, hxz, hzy⟩ := exists_dist_le_le hδ hε hxy
rw [dist_comm] at hxz
exact h.le_bot ⟨hxz, hzy⟩
#align disjoint_closed_ball_closed_ball_iff disjoint_closedBall_closedBall_iff
open EMetric ENNReal
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_thickening (hδ : 0 < δ) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
infEdist x (thickening δ s) = infEdist x s - ENNReal.ofReal δ := by
obtain hs | hs := lt_or_le (infEdist x s) (ENNReal.ofReal δ)
· rw [infEdist_zero_of_mem, tsub_eq_zero_of_le hs.le]
exact hs
refine (tsub_le_iff_right.2 infEdist_le_infEdist_thickening_add).antisymm' ?_
refine le_sub_of_add_le_right ofReal_ne_top ?_
refine le_infEdist.2 fun z hz => le_of_forall_lt' fun r h => ?_
cases' r with r
· exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 <| infEdist_ne_top ⟨z, self_subset_thickening hδ _ hz⟩,
ofReal_lt_top⟩
have hr : 0 < ↑r - δ := by
refine sub_pos_of_lt ?_
have := hs.trans_lt ((infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hz).trans_lt h)
rw [ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hδ.le] at this
exact mod_cast this
rw [edist_lt_coe, ← dist_lt_coe, ← add_sub_cancel δ ↑r] at h
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyz⟩ := exists_dist_lt_lt hr hδ h
refine (ENNReal.add_lt_add_right ofReal_ne_top <|
infEdist_lt_iff.2 ⟨_, mem_thickening_iff.2 ⟨_, hz, hyz⟩, edist_lt_ofReal.2 hxy⟩).trans_le ?_
rw [← ofReal_add hr.le hδ.le, sub_add_cancel, ofReal_coe_nnreal]
#align inf_edist_thickening infEdist_thickening
@[simp]
theorem thickening_thickening (hε : 0 < ε) (hδ : 0 < δ) (s : Set E) :
thickening ε (thickening δ s) = thickening (ε + δ) s :=
(thickening_thickening_subset _ _ _).antisymm fun x => by
simp_rw [mem_thickening_iff]
rintro ⟨z, hz, hxz⟩
rw [add_comm] at hxz
obtain ⟨y, hxy, hyz⟩ := exists_dist_lt_lt hε hδ hxz
exact ⟨y, ⟨_, hz, hyz⟩, hxy⟩
#align thickening_thickening thickening_thickening
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_thickening (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (hδ : 0 < δ) (s : Set E) :
cthickening ε (thickening δ s) = cthickening (ε + δ) s :=
(cthickening_thickening_subset hε _ _).antisymm fun x => by
simp_rw [mem_cthickening_iff, ENNReal.ofReal_add hε hδ.le, infEdist_thickening hδ]
exact tsub_le_iff_right.2
#align cthickening_thickening cthickening_thickening
-- Note: `interior (cthickening δ s) ≠ thickening δ s` in general
@[simp]
theorem closure_thickening (hδ : 0 < δ) (s : Set E) :
closure (thickening δ s) = cthickening δ s := by
rw [← cthickening_zero, cthickening_thickening le_rfl hδ, zero_add]
#align closure_thickening closure_thickening
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Pointwise.lean | 304 | 308 | theorem infEdist_cthickening (δ : ℝ) (s : Set E) (x : E) :
infEdist x (cthickening δ s) = infEdist x s - ENNReal.ofReal δ := by |
obtain hδ | hδ := le_or_lt δ 0
· rw [cthickening_of_nonpos hδ, infEdist_closure, ofReal_of_nonpos hδ, tsub_zero]
· rw [← closure_thickening hδ, infEdist_closure, infEdist_thickening hδ]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
#align_import analysis.normed.group.infinite_sum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9a59dcb7a2d06bf55da57b9030169219980660cd"
open Topology NNReal
open Finset Filter Metric
variable {ι α E F : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm {f : ι → E} :
(CauchySeq fun s : Finset ι => ∑ i ∈ s, f i) ↔
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s : Finset ι, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → ‖∑ i ∈ t, f i‖ < ε := by
rw [cauchySeq_finset_iff_sum_vanishing, nhds_basis_ball.forall_iff]
· simp only [ball_zero_eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· rintro s t hst ⟨s', hs'⟩
exact ⟨s', fun t' ht' => hst <| hs' _ ht'⟩
#align cauchy_seq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm
theorem summable_iff_vanishing_norm [CompleteSpace E] {f : ι → E} :
Summable f ↔ ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ s : Finset ι, ∀ t, Disjoint t s → ‖∑ i ∈ t, f i‖ < ε := by
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset, cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm]
#align summable_iff_vanishing_norm summable_iff_vanishing_norm
theorem cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded_eventually {f : ι → E} {g : ι → ℝ} (hg : Summable g)
(h : ∀ᶠ i in cofinite, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : CauchySeq fun s => ∑ i ∈ s, f i := by
refine cauchySeq_finset_iff_vanishing_norm.2 fun ε hε => ?_
rcases summable_iff_vanishing_norm.1 hg ε hε with ⟨s, hs⟩
classical
refine ⟨s ∪ h.toFinset, fun t ht => ?_⟩
have : ∀ i ∈ t, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i := by
intro i hi
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, not_or, h.mem_toFinset, Set.mem_compl_iff,
Classical.not_not] at ht
exact (ht hi).2
calc
‖∑ i ∈ t, f i‖ ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, g i := norm_sum_le_of_le _ this
_ ≤ ‖∑ i ∈ t, g i‖ := le_abs_self _
_ < ε := hs _ (ht.mono_right le_sup_left)
#align cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded_eventually cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded_eventually
theorem cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → E} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : Summable g)
(h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : CauchySeq fun s : Finset ι => ∑ i ∈ s, f i :=
cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded_eventually hg <| eventually_of_forall h
#align cauchy_seq_finset_of_norm_bounded cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded
theorem cauchySeq_range_of_norm_bounded {f : ℕ → E} (g : ℕ → ℝ)
(hg : CauchySeq fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i) (hf : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) :
CauchySeq fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, f i := by
refine Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.2 fun ε hε => ?_
refine (Metric.cauchySeq_iff'.1 hg ε hε).imp fun N hg n hn => ?_
specialize hg n hn
rw [dist_eq_norm, ← sum_Ico_eq_sub _ hn] at hg ⊢
calc
‖∑ k ∈ Ico N n, f k‖ ≤ ∑ k ∈ _, ‖f k‖ := norm_sum_le _ _
_ ≤ ∑ k ∈ _, g k := sum_le_sum fun x _ => hf x
_ ≤ ‖∑ k ∈ _, g k‖ := le_abs_self _
_ < ε := hg
#align cauchy_seq_range_of_norm_bounded cauchySeq_range_of_norm_bounded
theorem cauchySeq_finset_of_summable_norm {f : ι → E} (hf : Summable fun a => ‖f a‖) :
CauchySeq fun s : Finset ι => ∑ a ∈ s, f a :=
cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded _ hf fun _i => le_rfl
#align cauchy_seq_finset_of_summable_norm cauchySeq_finset_of_summable_norm
theorem hasSum_of_subseq_of_summable {f : ι → E} (hf : Summable fun a => ‖f a‖) {s : α → Finset ι}
{p : Filter α} [NeBot p] (hs : Tendsto s p atTop) {a : E}
(ha : Tendsto (fun b => ∑ i ∈ s b, f i) p (𝓝 a)) : HasSum f a :=
tendsto_nhds_of_cauchySeq_of_subseq (cauchySeq_finset_of_summable_norm hf) hs ha
#align has_sum_of_subseq_of_summable hasSum_of_subseq_of_summable
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm {f : ℕ → E} {a : E} (hf : Summable fun i => ‖f i‖) :
HasSum f a ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.tendsto_sum_nat, fun h => hasSum_of_subseq_of_summable hf tendsto_finset_range h⟩
#align has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_summable_norm
theorem Summable.of_norm_bounded [CompleteSpace E] {f : ι → E} (g : ι → ℝ) (hg : Summable g)
(h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : Summable f := by
rw [summable_iff_cauchySeq_finset]
exact cauchySeq_finset_of_norm_bounded g hg h
#align summable_of_norm_bounded Summable.of_norm_bounded
theorem HasSum.norm_le_of_bounded {f : ι → E} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : E} {b : ℝ} (hf : HasSum f a)
(hg : HasSum g b) (h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : ‖a‖ ≤ b := by
classical exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hf.norm hg fun _s ↦ norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun i _hi ↦ h i
#align has_sum.norm_le_of_bounded HasSum.norm_le_of_bounded
theorem tsum_of_norm_bounded {f : ι → E} {g : ι → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hg : HasSum g a)
(h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖ ≤ g i) : ‖∑' i : ι, f i‖ ≤ a := by
by_cases hf : Summable f
· exact hf.hasSum.norm_le_of_bounded hg h
· rw [tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable hf, norm_zero]
classical exact ge_of_tendsto' hg fun s => sum_nonneg fun i _hi => (norm_nonneg _).trans (h i)
#align tsum_of_norm_bounded tsum_of_norm_bounded
theorem norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm {f : ι → E} (hf : Summable fun i => ‖f i‖) :
‖∑' i, f i‖ ≤ ∑' i, ‖f i‖ :=
tsum_of_norm_bounded hf.hasSum fun _i => le_rfl
#align norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/InfiniteSum.lean | 146 | 149 | theorem tsum_of_nnnorm_bounded {f : ι → E} {g : ι → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} (hg : HasSum g a)
(h : ∀ i, ‖f i‖₊ ≤ g i) : ‖∑' i : ι, f i‖₊ ≤ a := by |
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← NNReal.hasSum_coe, coe_nnnorm] at *
exact tsum_of_norm_bounded hg h
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.hom_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_hom_whiskerRight
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeftIso
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerLeft
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRightIso
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h ≫ (α_ f' g h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ η ▷ g ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_comp_symm {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
(f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ η ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_middle CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_middle
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_middle CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_middle
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
(f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ g ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_right
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_right
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_whiskerLeft_symm (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom = (λ_ f).hom ≫ η := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (λ_ g).inv = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_inv_naturality
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ≫ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor_inv_naturality
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id_symm
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : 𝟙 a ◁ η = 𝟙 a ◁ θ ↔ η = θ := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iff CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_iff
theorem whiskerRight_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : η ▷ 𝟙 b = θ ▷ 𝟙 b ↔ η = θ := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iff CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_iff
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_whiskerRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ f).hom ▷ g = (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).hom ≫ (λ_ (f ≫ g)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, whiskerLeft_comp, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ←
cancel_epi ((α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _), pentagon_assoc, triangle, ← associator_naturality_middle, ←
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, triangle, associator_naturality_left]
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_whiskerRight
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ f).inv ▷ g = (λ_ (f ≫ g)).inv ≫ (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (ρ_ g).hom = (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).inv ≫ (ρ_ (f ≫ g)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv, ←
cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv), pentagon_inv_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right, ←
associator_inv_naturality_middle, ← whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right,
associator_inv_naturality_right]
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_rightUnitor
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ (f ≫ g)).inv ≫ (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_right_unitor_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 459 | 460 | theorem leftUnitor_comp (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ (f ≫ g)).hom = (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).inv ≫ (λ_ f).hom ▷ g := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
#align_import data.set.pointwise.list_of_fn from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
namespace Set
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
variable [Monoid α] {s t : Set α} {a : α} {m n : ℕ}
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/ListOfFn.lean | 26 | 31 | theorem mem_prod_list_ofFn {a : α} {s : Fin n → Set α} :
a ∈ (List.ofFn s).prod ↔ ∃ f : ∀ i : Fin n, s i, (List.ofFn fun i ↦ (f i : α)).prod = a := by |
induction' n with n ih generalizing a
· simp_rw [List.ofFn_zero, List.prod_nil, Fin.exists_fin_zero_pi, eq_comm, Set.mem_one]
· simp_rw [List.ofFn_succ, List.prod_cons, Fin.exists_fin_succ_pi, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ,
mem_mul, @ih, exists_exists_eq_and, SetCoe.exists, exists_prop]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
#align_import data.nat.choose.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
open Nat
namespace Nat
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 => choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
#align nat.choose Nat.choose
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align nat.choose_zero_right Nat.choose_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.choose_zero_succ Nat.choose_zero_succ
theorem choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) :=
rfl
#align nat.choose_succ_succ Nat.choose_succ_succ
theorem choose_succ_succ' (n k : ℕ) : choose (n + 1) (k + 1) = choose n k + choose n (k + 1) :=
rfl
theorem choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _, 0, hk => absurd hk (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| 0, k + 1, _ => choose_zero_succ _
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => by
have hnk : n < k := lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk
have hnk1 : n < k + 1 := lt_of_succ_lt hk
rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
#align nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 := by
induction n <;> simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
#align nat.choose_self Nat.choose_self
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.choose_succ_self Nat.choose_succ_self
@[simp]
lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n := by induction n <;> simp [*, choose, Nat.add_comm]
#align nat.choose_one_right Nat.choose_one_right
-- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number
theorem triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * (n + 1 - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n := by
rw [← add_mul_div_left, Nat.mul_comm 2 n, ← Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_comm]
cases n <;> rfl; apply zero_lt_succ
#align nat.triangle_succ Nat.triangle_succ
theorem choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [triangle_succ n, choose, ih]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
#align nat.choose_two_right Nat.choose_two_right
theorem choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0, _, hk => by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; decide
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => Nat.add_pos_left (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) _
#align nat.choose_pos Nat.choose_pos
theorem choose_eq_zero_iff {n k : ℕ} : n.choose k = 0 ↔ n < k :=
⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge (mt Nat.choose_pos h.symm.not_lt), Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt⟩
#align nat.choose_eq_zero_iff Nat.choose_eq_zero_iff
theorem succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0, 0 => by decide
| 0, k + 1 => by simp [choose]
| n + 1, 0 => by simp [choose, mul_succ, succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_comm]
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), Nat.add_mul, ← succ_mul_choose_eq n, mul_succ, ←
succ_mul_choose_eq n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_add, ← choose_succ_succ, ← succ_mul]
#align nat.succ_mul_choose_eq Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq
theorem choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * k ! * (n - k)! = n !
| 0, _, hk => by simp [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, succ k, hk => by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ | hk₁
· have h : choose n k * k.succ ! * (n - k)! = (k + 1) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₁ : (n - k)! = (n - k) * (n - k.succ)! := by
rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), factorial_succ]
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * k.succ ! * ((n - k) * (n - k.succ)!) = (n - k) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_lt_succ hk₁)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₃ : k * n ! ≤ n * n ! := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)
rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, Nat.add_mul,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, factorial_succ, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, Nat.add_assoc,
← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_comm]
· rw [hk₁]; simp [hk₁, Nat.mul_comm, choose, Nat.sub_self]
#align nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial
theorem choose_mul {n k s : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n) (hsk : s ≤ k) :
n.choose k * k.choose s = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) :=
have h : 0 < (n - k)! * (k - s)! * s ! := by apply_rules [factorial_pos, Nat.mul_pos]
Nat.mul_right_cancel h <|
calc
n.choose k * k.choose s * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) =
n.choose k * (k.choose s * s ! * (k - s)!) * (n - k)! := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc _ s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (n - k)!, Nat.mul_comm s !]
_ = n ! := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hsk, choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hkn]
_ = n.choose s * s ! * ((n - s).choose (k - s) * (k - s)! * (n - s - (k - s))!) := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.sub_le_sub_right hkn _),
choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (hsk.trans hkn)]
_ = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right hsk, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (k - s)!, Nat.mul_comm s !, Nat.mul_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
#align nat.choose_mul Nat.choose_mul
theorem choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) :
choose n k = n ! / (k ! * (n - k)!) := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]
exact (mul_div_left _ (Nat.mul_pos (factorial_pos _) (factorial_pos _))).symm
#align nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial Nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial
theorem add_choose (i j : ℕ) : (i + j).choose j = (i + j)! / (i ! * j !) := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.le_add_left j i), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_comm]
#align nat.add_choose Nat.add_choose
theorem add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (i j : ℕ) :
(i + j).choose j * i ! * j ! = (i + j)! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_right_comm]
#align nat.add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial Nat.add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : k ! * (n - k)! ∣ n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]; exact Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _
#align nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial Nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add (i j : ℕ) : i ! * j ! ∣ (i + j)! := by
suffices i ! * (i + j - i) ! ∣ (i + j)! by
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left i j] at this
exact factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add Nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add
@[simp]
theorem choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n - k) = choose n k := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial hk, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.sub_le _ _),
Nat.sub_sub_self hk, Nat.mul_comm]
#align nat.choose_symm Nat.choose_symm
theorem choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : Nat.choose n a = Nat.choose n b := by
suffices choose n (n - b) = choose n b by
rw [h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right] at this; rwa [h]
exact choose_symm (h ▸ le_add_left _ _)
#align nat.choose_symm_of_eq_add Nat.choose_symm_of_eq_add
theorem choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a + b) a = choose (a + b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
#align nat.choose_symm_add Nat.choose_symm_add
theorem choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m := by
apply choose_symm_of_eq_add
rw [Nat.add_comm m 1, Nat.add_assoc 1 m m, Nat.add_comm (2 * m) 1, Nat.two_mul m]
#align nat.choose_symm_half Nat.choose_symm_half
theorem choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) := by
have e : (n + 1) * choose n k = choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) + choose n k * (k + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm (choose _ _), ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq]
rw [← Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
#align nat.choose_succ_right_eq Nat.choose_succ_right_eq
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self_right : ∀ n : ℕ, (n + 1).choose n = n + 1
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_succ_self_right n, choose_self]
#align nat.choose_succ_self_right Nat.choose_succ_self_right
theorem choose_mul_succ_eq (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k * (n + 1) = (n + 1).choose k * (n + 1 - k) := by
cases k with
| zero => simp
| succ k =>
obtain hk | hk := le_or_lt (k + 1) (n + 1)
· rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, ← choose_succ_right_eq, ← succ_sub_succ,
Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ hk)]
· rw [choose_eq_zero_of_lt hk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (n.lt_succ_self.trans hk), Nat.zero_mul,
Nat.zero_mul]
#align nat.choose_mul_succ_eq Nat.choose_mul_succ_eq
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) :
(n + 1).ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k).choose k := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n + k - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial <| Nat.le_add_left k n, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
← factorial_mul_ascFactorial, Nat.mul_comm]
#align nat.asc_factorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose Nat.ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose
theorem ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' (n k : ℕ) :
n.ascFactorial k = k ! * (n + k - 1).choose k := by
cases n
· cases k
· rw [ascFactorial_zero, choose_zero_right, factorial_zero, Nat.mul_one]
· simp only [zero_ascFactorial, zero_eq, Nat.zero_add, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.le_zero_eq, Nat.sub_zero, choose_succ_self, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
simp only [succ_add_sub_one]
theorem factorial_dvd_ascFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.ascFactorial k :=
⟨(n + k - 1).choose k, ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _⟩
#align nat.factorial_dvd_asc_factorial Nat.factorial_dvd_ascFactorial
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k).choose k = (n + 1).ascFactorial k / k ! := by
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel k.factorial_pos
rw [← ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' <| factorial_dvd_ascFactorial _ _).symm
#align nat.choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial Nat.choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial
theorem choose_eq_asc_factorial_div_factorial' (n k : ℕ) :
(n + k - 1).choose k = n.ascFactorial k / k ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right k.factorial_ne_zero (ascFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose' _ _).symm
theorem descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose (n k : ℕ) : n.descFactorial k = k ! * n.choose k := by
obtain h | h := Nat.lt_or_ge n k
· rw [descFactorial_eq_zero_iff_lt.2 h, choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.mul_zero]
rw [Nat.mul_comm]
apply Nat.mul_right_cancel (n - k).factorial_pos
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial h, ← factorial_mul_descFactorial h, Nat.mul_comm]
#align nat.desc_factorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose
theorem factorial_dvd_descFactorial (n k : ℕ) : k ! ∣ n.descFactorial k :=
⟨n.choose k, descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose _ _⟩
#align nat.factorial_dvd_desc_factorial Nat.factorial_dvd_descFactorial
theorem choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial (n k : ℕ) : n.choose k = n.descFactorial k / k ! :=
Nat.eq_div_of_mul_eq_right k.factorial_ne_zero (descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose _ _).symm
#align nat.choose_eq_desc_factorial_div_factorial Nat.choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial
def fast_choose n k := Nat.descFactorial n k / Nat.factorial k
@[csimp] lemma choose_eq_fast_choose : Nat.choose = fast_choose :=
funext (fun _ => funext (Nat.choose_eq_descFactorial_div_factorial _))
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Basic.lean | 296 | 302 | theorem choose_le_succ_of_lt_half_left {r n : ℕ} (h : r < n / 2) :
choose n r ≤ choose n (r + 1) := by |
refine Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt (h.trans_le (n.div_le_self 2)))
rw [← choose_succ_right_eq]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
rw [← Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt, ← Nat.mul_two]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h Nat.zero_lt_two) (n.div_mul_le_self 2)
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
#align_import ring_theory.class_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"565eb991e264d0db702722b4bde52ee5173c9950"
variable {R K L : Type*} [CommRing R]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [DecidableEq L]
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
variable [Algebra K L] [FiniteDimensional K L]
variable [Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R K L]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open IsLocalization IsFractionRing FractionalIdeal Units
section
variable (R K)
irreducible_def toPrincipalIdeal : Kˣ →* (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)ˣ :=
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨spanSingleton _ x, spanSingleton _ x⁻¹, by
simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.mul_inv', spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton], by
simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.inv_mul', spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]⟩
map_mul' := fun x y =>
ext (by simp only [Units.val_mk, Units.val_mul, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton])
map_one' := ext (by simp only [spanSingleton_one, Units.val_mk, Units.val_one]) }
#align to_principal_ideal toPrincipalIdeal
variable {R K}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/ClassGroup.lean | 61 | 63 | theorem coe_toPrincipalIdeal (x : Kˣ) :
(toPrincipalIdeal R K x : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = spanSingleton _ (x : K) := by |
simp only [toPrincipalIdeal]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le'
theorem lintegral_sub_le (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub_le' f g hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h : ∃ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ g x) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, Ne, Classical.not_not]
exact ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le h_le hfi hg h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) {s : Set α} (hμs : μ s ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt hg hfi h_le <|
((frequently_ae_mem_iff.2 hμs).and_eventually h).mono fun _x hx => (hx.2 hx.1).ne
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on
theorem lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
rw [Ne, ← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
refine lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on hg hfi (ae_le_of_ae_lt h) hμ ?_
simpa using h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono
theorem set_lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ 0) (hg : Measurable g) (hfi : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono (by simp [hs]) hg.aemeasurable hfi ((ae_restrict_iff' hsm).mpr h)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_strict_mono
theorem lintegral_iInf_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ ≤ᵐ[μ] f n) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
have fn_le_f0 : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
have fn_le_f0' : ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ := iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
(ENNReal.sub_right_inj h_fin fn_le_f0 fn_le_f0').1 <|
show ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ from
calc
∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_sub (measurable_iInf h_meas)
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun a => iInf_le _ _)).symm
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ := congr rfl (funext fun a => ENNReal.sub_iInf)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup_ae (fun n => (h_meas 0).sub (h_meas n)) fun n =>
(h_mono n).mono fun a ha => tsub_le_tsub le_rfl ha)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
(have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ a ≤ f n a := ae_all_iff.2 h_mono
have h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f 0 a := fun n =>
h_mono.mono fun a h => by
induction' n with n ih
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans (h n) ih
congr_arg iSup <|
funext fun n =>
lintegral_sub (h_meas _) (ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono_ae <| h_mono n)
(h_mono n))
_ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := ENNReal.sub_iInf.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_ae
theorem lintegral_iInf {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_anti : Antitone f)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iInf_ae h_meas (fun n => ae_of_all _ <| h_anti n.le_succ) h_fin
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf
theorem lintegral_iInf' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_anti : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a)) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iInf_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Antitone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_anti
have h_ae_seq_mono : Antitone (aeSeq h_meas p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet h_meas p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet h_meas hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iInf h_meas hp).symm]
simp_rw [iInf_apply]
rw [lintegral_iInf (aeSeq.measurable h_meas p) h_ae_seq_mono]
· congr
exact funext fun n ↦ lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp n)
· rwa [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp 0)]
theorem lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [Countable β]
{f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b))
(hf_int : ∀ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_directed : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp only [iInf_of_empty, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.top_mul (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.mpr hμ)]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨅ b, f b a = ⨅ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
refine fun a =>
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun n => iInf_le _ _)
(le_iInf fun b => iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) ?_)
exact h_directed.sequence_le b a
-- Porting note: used `∘` below to deal with its reduced reducibility
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by simp only [this, Function.comp_apply]
_ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_iInf ?_ h_directed.sequence_anti]
· exact hf_int _
· exact fun n => hf _
_ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun b => ?_) (le_iInf fun n => ?_)
· exact iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.sequence_le b)
· exact iInf_le (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
#align lintegral_infi_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_liminf_le' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
calc
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat]
_ = ⨆ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup' (fun n => aemeasurable_biInf _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ h_meas i))
(ae_of_all μ fun a n m hnm => iInf_le_iInf_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi))
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := iSup_mono fun n => le_iInf₂_lintegral _
_ = atTop.liminf fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le'
theorem lintegral_liminf_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
lintegral_liminf_le' fun n => (h_meas n).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le
theorem limsup_lintegral_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_bound : ∀ n, f n ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ :=
calc
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
_ ≤ ⨅ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := iInf_mono fun n => iSup₂_lintegral_le _
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
refine (lintegral_iInf ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro n
exact measurable_biSup _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ hf_meas i)
· intro n m hnm a
exact iSup_le_iSup_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi
· refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin (lintegral_mono_ae ?_)
refine (ae_all_iff.2 h_bound).mono fun n hn => ?_
exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => hn i
_ = ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ := by simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat]
#align measure_theory.limsup_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.limsup_lintegral_le
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) :=
tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
(calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n : ℕ => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.liminf_eq.symm
_ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop := lintegral_liminf_le hF_meas
)
(calc
limsup (fun n : ℕ => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
limsup_lintegral_le hF_meas h_bound h_fin
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.limsup_eq
)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) := by
have : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a ∂μ := fun n =>
lintegral_congr_ae (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk
simp_rw [this]
apply
tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence bound (fun n => (hF_meas n).measurable_mk) _ h_fin
· have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := fun n => (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk.symm
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := ae_all_iff.mpr this
filter_upwards [this, h_lim] with a H H'
simp_rw [H]
exact H'
· intro n
filter_upwards [h_bound n, (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk] with a H H'
rwa [H'] at H
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence'
theorem tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {F : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (bound : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, F n a ≤ bound a)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl := by
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
exact xl
have h := inter_mem hF_meas h_bound
replace h := hxl _ h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact bound
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).1
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).2
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· assumption
· refine h_lim.mono fun a h_lim => ?_
apply @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) fun n => F n a
· assumption
rw [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
assumption
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_anti : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h0 : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
have : Antitone fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij ↦
lintegral_mono_ae (h_anti.mono fun x hx ↦ hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf this
rw [← lintegral_iInf' hf h_anti h0]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_anti, h_tendsto] with _ hx_anti hx_tendsto
using tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iInf hx_anti)
section
open Encodable
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b)) (h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp [iSup_of_empty]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨆ b, f b a = ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
intro a
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun b => ?_) (iSup_le fun n => le_iSup (fun n => f n a) _)
exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (h_directed.le_sequence b a)
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ := by simp only [this]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => hf _) h_directed.sequence_mono)
_ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun b => ?_)
· exact le_iSup (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
· exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.le_sequence b)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b, AEMeasurable (f b) μ)
(h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (β → ENNReal) → Prop := fun x f' => Directed LE.le f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := by
filter_upwards [] with x i j
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed i j
exact ⟨z, hz₁ x, hz₂ x⟩
have h_ae_seq_directed : Directed LE.le (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro b₁ b₂
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed b₁ b₂
refine ⟨z, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· repeat rw [aeSeq.aeSeq_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx]
apply_rules [hz₁, hz₂]
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
convert lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_directed using 1
· simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
· congr 1
ext1 b
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
apply EventuallyEq.symm
exact aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed
end
theorem lintegral_tsum [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑' i, f i a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [lintegral_iSup_directed]
· simp [lintegral_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => hf i]
· intro b
exact Finset.aemeasurable_sum _ fun i _ => hf i
· intro s t
use s ∪ t
constructor
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_left
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tsum MeasureTheory.lintegral_tsum
open Measure
theorem lintegral_iUnion₀ [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_iUnion_ae hd hm, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion₀
theorem lintegral_iUnion [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iUnion₀ (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion₀ {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : t.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, lintegral_iUnion₀ (SetCoe.forall'.1 hm) (hd.subtype _ _)]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, MeasurableSet (s i)) (hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion₀ ht (fun i hi => (hm i hi).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on t)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t b) μ)
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [← Finset.mem_coe, lintegral_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hm hd, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} (hd : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t b)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint (fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet) f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset
theorem lintegral_iUnion_le [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ ≤ ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_sum_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' restrict_iUnion_le le_rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion_le
theorem lintegral_union {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {A B : Set α} (hB : MeasurableSet B) (hAB : Disjoint A B) :
∫⁻ a in A ∪ B, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in A, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in B, f a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union hAB hB, lintegral_add_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_union MeasureTheory.lintegral_union
theorem lintegral_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s ∪ t, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' (restrict_union_le _ _) le_rfl
theorem lintegral_inter_add_diff {B : Set α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (A : Set α) (hB : MeasurableSet B) :
∫⁻ x in A ∩ B, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in A \ B, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, restrict_inter_add_diff _ hB]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.lintegral_inter_add_diff
theorem lintegral_add_compl (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {A : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in Aᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, Measure.restrict_add_restrict_compl hA]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_compl MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_compl
theorem lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ x, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
have hm : MeasurableSet { x | f x ≤ g x } := measurableSet_le hf hg
rw [← lintegral_add_compl (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) hm]
simp only [← compl_setOf, ← not_le]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm ?_) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm.compl ?_)
exacts [ae_of_all _ fun x => max_eq_right (a := f x) (b := g x),
ae_of_all _ fun x (hx : ¬ f x ≤ g x) => max_eq_left (not_le.1 hx).le]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_max MeasureTheory.lintegral_max
theorem set_lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in s, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_max hf hg, restrict_restrict, restrict_restrict, inter_comm s, inter_comm s]
exacts [measurableSet_lt hg hf, measurableSet_le hf hg]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_max MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_max
theorem lintegral_map {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
erw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral (hf.comp hg)]
congr with n : 1
convert SimpleFunc.lintegral_map _ hg
ext1 x; simp only [eapprox_comp hf hg, coe_comp]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map MeasureTheory.lintegral_map
theorem lintegral_map' {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f (Measure.map g μ)) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂Measure.map g μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂Measure.map (hg.mk g) μ := by
congr 1
exact Measure.map_congr hg.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f (hg.mk g a) ∂μ := lintegral_map hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f (g a) ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| hg.ae_eq_mk.symm.fun_comp _
_ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae (ae_eq_comp hg hf.ae_eq_mk.symm)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map' MeasureTheory.lintegral_map'
theorem lintegral_map_le {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup_le fun h'i => ?_
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (i ∘ g) (hi.comp hg) ?_
exact le_iSup_of_le (fun x => h'i (g x)) (le_of_eq (lintegral_map hi hg))
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_map_le
theorem lintegral_comp [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : lintegral μ (f ∘ g) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ :=
(lintegral_map hf hg).symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_comp MeasureTheory.lintegral_comp
theorem set_lintegral_map [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ y in s, f y ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ x in g ⁻¹' s, f (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_map hg hs, lintegral_map hf hg]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_map MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_map
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,427 | 1,431 | theorem lintegral_indicator_const_comp {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) (f a) ∂μ = c * μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by |
erw [lintegral_comp (measurable_const.indicator hs) hf, lintegral_indicator_const hs,
Measure.map_apply hf hs]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle EuclideanGeometry.oangle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (o.continuousAt_oangle hf1 hf2).comp ((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_oangle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left_right
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ := by
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ := by
rw [← (vsub_left_injective p₂).ne_iff]; exact o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero h
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) : p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₁ ≠ p₂ :=
left_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) : p₃ ≠ p₂ :=
right_ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.right_ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
p₁ ≠ p₃ :=
left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign ≠ 0)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.left_ne_right_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = -∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ + ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_oangle_rev _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0 ∧ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ π ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] := by
rw [oangle, o.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub ℝ _ (1 : Fin 3), ←
linearIndependent_equiv (finSuccAboveEquiv (1 : Fin 3)).toEquiv]
convert Iff.rfl
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affine_independent EuclideanGeometry.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ∨ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_or, oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent,
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear
theorem oangle_sign_eq_zero_iff_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 0 ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) := by
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff, oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear]
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₁, p₂, p₃] ↔ AffineIndependent ℝ ![p₄, p₅, p₆] := by
simp_rw [← oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_affineIndependent, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.affine_independent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.affineIndependent_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆) :
Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃} : Set P) ↔ Collinear ℝ ({p₄, p₅, p₆} : Set P) := by
simp_rw [← oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_collinear, ← Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align euclidean_geometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq EuclideanGeometry.collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₁, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₄, p₅} : Set P))
(h₃₂₆₅ : vectorSpan ℝ ({p₃, p₂} : Set P) = vectorSpan ℝ ({p₆, p₅} : Set P)) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
simp_rw [vectorSpan_pair] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact o.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vector_span_eq EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P}
(h₁₂₄₅ : line[ℝ, p₁, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₄, p₅]) (h₃₂₆₅ : line[ℝ, p₃, p₂] ∥ line[ℝ, p₆, p₅]) :
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ := by
rw [AffineSubspace.affineSpan_pair_parallel_iff_vectorSpan_eq] at h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
exact two_zsmul_oangle_of_vectorSpan_eq h₁₂₄₅ h₃₂₆₅
#align euclidean_geometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel EuclideanGeometry.two_zsmul_oangle_of_parallel
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₁ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_add_swap (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_swap EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_swap
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∡ p₂ p p₃ :=
o.oangle_sub_left (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₃ - ∡ p₂ p p₃ = ∡ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_sub_right (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_sub_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ + ∡ p₂ p p₃ + ∡ p₃ p p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_add_cyc3 (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_add_cyc3 EuclideanGeometry.oangle_add_cyc3
theorem oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₂ p₃ p₁,
o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hn : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, oangle]
convert o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ h using 1
· rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₃, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, o.oangle_neg_neg]
· rw [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]; simp
· simpa using hn
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).toReal| < π / 2 := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at h
rw [oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₃ p₂ p₁]
exact o.abs_oangle_sub_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_right_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ p₃) : |(∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq h ▸ abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h
#align euclidean_geometry.abs_oangle_left_to_real_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq EuclideanGeometry.abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₁ p p₂) = Real.cos (∠ p₁ p p₂) :=
o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = ∠ p₁ p p₂ ∨ ∡ p₁ p p₂ = -∠ p₁ p p₂ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∠ p₁ p p₂ = |(∡ p₁ p p₂).toReal| :=
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_to_real EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P}
(h : (∡ p₁ p p₂).sign = 0) : p₁ = p ∨ p₂ = p ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ∨ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = π := by
convert o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero h <;> simp
#align euclidean_geometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆)
(hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ p₆ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃ : p₃ ≠ p₂)
(hp₄ : p₄ ≠ p₅) (hp₆ : p₆ ≠ p₅) (hs : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₄ p₅ p₆).sign) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₄ p₅ p₆ ↔ ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∡ p₄ p₅ p₆ :=
o.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₃) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₄)
(vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₆) hs
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = 1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = -1) :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = -∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
o.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one h
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {p p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ≠ p) (hp₂ : p₂ ≠ p) :
∡ p₁ p p₂ = 0 ↔ ∠ p₁ p p₂ = 0 :=
o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₁) (vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
o.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle, ← InnerProductGeometry.inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two]
exact o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(-π / 2)) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π / 2 := by
rw [angle_comm]
exact angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_swap₁₂_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₂ p₁ p₃).sign := by
rw [eq_comm, oangle, oangle, ← o.oangle_neg_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left p₁ p₃ p₂, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₃ p₂, sub_eq_add_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₁, add_comm, ← @neg_one_smul ℝ]
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul ℝ (p₁ -ᵥ p₂)]
rw [o.oangle_sign_smul_add_smul_right]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₂_sign
theorem oangle_swap₁₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₃ p₂ p₁).sign := by
rw [oangle_rev, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_neg]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₁₃_sign
theorem oangle_swap₂₃_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : -(∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign = (∡ p₁ p₃ p₂).sign := by
rw [oangle_swap₁₃_sign, ← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_swap₂₃_sign
theorem oangle_rotate_sign (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃).sign := by
rw [← oangle_swap₁₂_sign, oangle_swap₁₃_sign]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_rotate_sign EuclideanGeometry.oangle_rotate_sign
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi, angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw EuclideanGeometry.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π :=
oangle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw.2 h
#align sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi, ← h.oangle₁₂₃_eq_pi]
#align sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi Sbtw.oangle₃₂₁_eq_pi
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
by_cases hp₂p₁ : p₂ = p₁; · simp [hp₂p₁]
by_cases hp₃p₁ : p₃ = p₁; · simp [hp₃p₁]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₂p₁ hp₃p₁]
exact h.angle₂₁₃_eq_zero_of_ne hp₂p₁
#align wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero, h.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero]
#align wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₂₁₃_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₂₃₁_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Wbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.symm.oangle₃₁₂_eq_zero
#align wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
theorem _root_.Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∡ p₁ p₃ p₂ = 0 :=
h.wbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
#align sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero Sbtw.oangle₁₃₂_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 545 | 550 | theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_wbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} :
∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 ↔ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₁ p₃ ∨ Wbtw ℝ p₂ p₃ p₁ := by |
by_cases hp₁p₂ : p₁ = p₂; · simp [hp₁p₂]
by_cases hp₃p₂ : p₃ = p₂; · simp [hp₃p₂]
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero hp₁p₂ hp₃p₂, angle_eq_zero_iff_ne_and_wbtw]
simp [hp₁p₂, hp₃p₂]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
#align_import data.multiset.fold from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
namespace Multiset
variable {α β : Type*}
section Fold
variable (op : α → α → α) [hc : Std.Commutative op] [ha : Std.Associative op]
local notation a " * " b => op a b
def fold : α → Multiset α → α :=
foldr op (left_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc)
#align multiset.fold Multiset.fold
theorem fold_eq_foldr (b : α) (s : Multiset α) :
fold op b s = foldr op (left_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc) b s :=
rfl
#align multiset.fold_eq_foldr Multiset.fold_eq_foldr
@[simp]
theorem coe_fold_r (b : α) (l : List α) : fold op b l = l.foldr op b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_fold_r Multiset.coe_fold_r
theorem coe_fold_l (b : α) (l : List α) : fold op b l = l.foldl op b :=
(coe_foldr_swap op _ b l).trans <| by simp [hc.comm]
#align multiset.coe_fold_l Multiset.coe_fold_l
theorem fold_eq_foldl (b : α) (s : Multiset α) :
fold op b s = foldl op (right_comm _ hc.comm ha.assoc) b s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => coe_fold_l _ _ _
#align multiset.fold_eq_foldl Multiset.fold_eq_foldl
@[simp]
theorem fold_zero (b : α) : (0 : Multiset α).fold op b = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.fold_zero Multiset.fold_zero
@[simp]
theorem fold_cons_left : ∀ (b a : α) (s : Multiset α), (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = a * s.fold op b :=
foldr_cons _ _
#align multiset.fold_cons_left Multiset.fold_cons_left
theorem fold_cons_right (b a : α) (s : Multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = s.fold op b * a := by
simp [hc.comm]
#align multiset.fold_cons_right Multiset.fold_cons_right
theorem fold_cons'_right (b a : α) (s : Multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = s.fold op (b * a) := by
rw [fold_eq_foldl, foldl_cons, ← fold_eq_foldl]
#align multiset.fold_cons'_right Multiset.fold_cons'_right
theorem fold_cons'_left (b a : α) (s : Multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).fold op b = s.fold op (a * b) := by
rw [fold_cons'_right, hc.comm]
#align multiset.fold_cons'_left Multiset.fold_cons'_left
theorem fold_add (b₁ b₂ : α) (s₁ s₂ : Multiset α) :
(s₁ + s₂).fold op (b₁ * b₂) = s₁.fold op b₁ * s₂.fold op b₂ :=
Multiset.induction_on s₂ (by rw [add_zero, fold_zero, ← fold_cons'_right, ← fold_cons_right op])
(fun a b h => by rw [fold_cons_left, add_cons, fold_cons_left, h, ← ha.assoc, hc.comm a,
ha.assoc])
#align multiset.fold_add Multiset.fold_add
theorem fold_bind {ι : Type*} (s : Multiset ι) (t : ι → Multiset α) (b : ι → α) (b₀ : α) :
(s.bind t).fold op ((s.map b).fold op b₀) =
(s.map fun i => (t i).fold op (b i)).fold op b₀ := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with a ha ih
· rw [zero_bind, map_zero, map_zero, fold_zero]
· rw [cons_bind, map_cons, map_cons, fold_cons_left, fold_cons_left, fold_add, ih]
#align multiset.fold_bind Multiset.fold_bind
theorem fold_singleton (b a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).fold op b = a * b :=
foldr_singleton _ _ _ _
#align multiset.fold_singleton Multiset.fold_singleton
theorem fold_distrib {f g : β → α} (u₁ u₂ : α) (s : Multiset β) :
(s.map fun x => f x * g x).fold op (u₁ * u₂) = (s.map f).fold op u₁ * (s.map g).fold op u₂ :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (fun a b h => by
rw [map_cons, fold_cons_left, h, map_cons, fold_cons_left, map_cons,
fold_cons_right, ha.assoc, ← ha.assoc (g a), hc.comm (g a),
ha.assoc, hc.comm (g a), ha.assoc])
#align multiset.fold_distrib Multiset.fold_distrib
theorem fold_hom {op' : β → β → β} [Std.Commutative op'] [Std.Associative op'] {m : α → β}
(hm : ∀ x y, m (op x y) = op' (m x) (m y)) (b : α) (s : Multiset α) :
(s.map m).fold op' (m b) = m (s.fold op b) :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [hm])
#align multiset.fold_hom Multiset.fold_hom
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Fold.lean | 108 | 110 | theorem fold_union_inter [DecidableEq α] (s₁ s₂ : Multiset α) (b₁ b₂ : α) :
((s₁ ∪ s₂).fold op b₁ * (s₁ ∩ s₂).fold op b₂) = s₁.fold op b₁ * s₂.fold op b₂ := by |
rw [← fold_add op, union_add_inter, fold_add op]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
#align_import data.set.pairwise.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4c2ed622f43768eff32608d4a0f8a6cec1c047d"
open Function Order Set
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*} {r p q : α → α → Prop}
section Pairwise
variable {f g : ι → α} {s t u : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem pairwise_on_bool (hr : Symmetric r) {a b : α} :
Pairwise (r on fun c => cond c a b) ↔ r a b := by simpa [Pairwise, Function.onFun] using @hr a b
#align pairwise_on_bool pairwise_on_bool
theorem pairwise_disjoint_on_bool [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] {a b : α} :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun c => cond c a b) ↔ Disjoint a b :=
pairwise_on_bool Disjoint.symm
#align pairwise_disjoint_on_bool pairwise_disjoint_on_bool
theorem Symmetric.pairwise_on [LinearOrder ι] (hr : Symmetric r) (f : ι → α) :
Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → r (f m) (f n) :=
⟨fun h _m _n hmn => h hmn.ne, fun h _m _n hmn => hmn.lt_or_lt.elim (@h _ _) fun h' => hr (h h')⟩
#align symmetric.pairwise_on Symmetric.pairwise_on
theorem pairwise_disjoint_on [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] [LinearOrder ι] (f : ι → α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) ↔ ∀ ⦃m n⦄, m < n → Disjoint (f m) (f n) :=
Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm f
#align pairwise_disjoint_on pairwise_disjoint_on
theorem pairwise_disjoint_mono [SemilatticeInf α] [OrderBot α] (hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(h : g ≤ f) : Pairwise (Disjoint on g) :=
hs.mono fun i j hij => Disjoint.mono (h i) (h j) hij
#align pairwise_disjoint.mono pairwise_disjoint_mono
namespace Set
theorem Pairwise.mono (h : t ⊆ s) (hs : s.Pairwise r) : t.Pairwise r :=
fun _x xt _y yt => hs (h xt) (h yt)
#align set.pairwise.mono Set.Pairwise.mono
theorem Pairwise.mono' (H : r ≤ p) (hr : s.Pairwise r) : s.Pairwise p :=
hr.imp H
#align set.pairwise.mono' Set.Pairwise.mono'
theorem pairwise_top (s : Set α) : s.Pairwise ⊤ :=
pairwise_of_forall s _ fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.pairwise_top Set.pairwise_top
protected theorem Subsingleton.pairwise (h : s.Subsingleton) (r : α → α → Prop) : s.Pairwise r :=
fun _x hx _y hy hne => (hne (h hx hy)).elim
#align set.subsingleton.pairwise Set.Subsingleton.pairwise
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_empty (r : α → α → Prop) : (∅ : Set α).Pairwise r :=
subsingleton_empty.pairwise r
#align set.pairwise_empty Set.pairwise_empty
@[simp]
theorem pairwise_singleton (a : α) (r : α → α → Prop) : Set.Pairwise {a} r :=
subsingleton_singleton.pairwise r
#align set.pairwise_singleton Set.pairwise_singleton
theorem pairwise_iff_of_refl [IsRefl α r] : s.Pairwise r ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → r a b :=
forall₄_congr fun _ _ _ _ => or_iff_not_imp_left.symm.trans <| or_iff_right_of_imp of_eq
#align set.pairwise_iff_of_refl Set.pairwise_iff_of_refl
alias ⟨Pairwise.of_refl, _⟩ := pairwise_iff_of_refl
#align set.pairwise.of_refl Set.Pairwise.of_refl
theorem Nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall [IsEquiv α r] {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z := by
constructor
· rcases hs with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine fun H => ⟨f y, fun x hx => ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | hne)
· apply IsRefl.refl
· exact H hx hy hne
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ x hx y hy _
exact @IsTrans.trans α r _ (f x) z (f y) (hz _ hx) (IsSymm.symm _ _ <| hz _ hy)
#align set.nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall Set.Nonempty.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
theorem Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → ι} :
(s.Pairwise fun x y => f x = f y) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
hs.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
#align set.nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq Set.Nonempty.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq
theorem pairwise_iff_exists_forall [Nonempty ι] (s : Set α) (f : α → ι) {r : ι → ι → Prop}
[IsEquiv ι r] : s.Pairwise (r on f) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, r (f x) z := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· simp
· exact hne.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
#align set.pairwise_iff_exists_forall Set.pairwise_iff_exists_forall
theorem pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq [Nonempty ι] (s : Set α) (f : α → ι) :
(s.Pairwise fun x y => f x = f y) ↔ ∃ z, ∀ x ∈ s, f x = z :=
pairwise_iff_exists_forall s f
#align set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq Set.pairwise_eq_iff_exists_eq
theorem pairwise_union :
(s ∪ t).Pairwise r ↔
s.Pairwise r ∧ t.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by
simp only [Set.Pairwise, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
exact
⟨fun H => ⟨H.1.1, H.2.2, H.1.2, fun x hx y hy hne => H.2.1 y hy x hx hne.symm⟩,
fun H => ⟨⟨H.1, H.2.2.1⟩, fun x hx y hy hne => H.2.2.2 y hy x hx hne.symm, H.2.1⟩⟩
#align set.pairwise_union Set.pairwise_union
theorem pairwise_union_of_symmetric (hr : Symmetric r) :
(s ∪ t).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ t.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b → r a b :=
pairwise_union.trans <| by simp only [hr.iff, and_self_iff]
#align set.pairwise_union_of_symmetric Set.pairwise_union_of_symmetric
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pairwise/Basic.lean | 151 | 154 | theorem pairwise_insert :
(insert a s).Pairwise r ↔ s.Pairwise r ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b ∧ r b a := by |
simp only [insert_eq, pairwise_union, pairwise_singleton, true_and_iff, mem_singleton_iff,
forall_eq]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Content
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Compact
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
noncomputable section
open Set Inv Function TopologicalSpace MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal Classical ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
namespace haar
-- Porting note: Even in `noncomputable section`, a definition with `to_additive` require
-- `noncomputable` to generate an additive definition.
-- Please refer to leanprover/lean4#2077.
@[to_additive addIndex "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index`"]
noncomputable def index (K V : Set G) : ℕ :=
sInf <| Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex
@[to_additive addIndex_empty]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Basic.lean | 102 | 104 | theorem index_empty {V : Set G} : index ∅ V = 0 := by |
simp only [index, Nat.sInf_eq_zero]; left; use ∅
simp only [Finset.card_empty, empty_subset, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Slope
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.slope from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter TopologicalSpace
open Filter Set
section NormedField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
theorem hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope {x : 𝕜} {L : Filter 𝕜} :
HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 f') :=
calc HasDerivAtFilter f f' x L
↔ Tendsto (fun y ↦ slope f x y - (y - x)⁻¹ • (y - x) • f') L (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto, ← norm_inv, ← norm_smul,
← tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, slope_def_module, smul_sub]
_ ↔ Tendsto (fun y ↦ slope f x y - (y - x)⁻¹ • (y - x) • f') (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 0) :=
.symm <| tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq <| by simp
_ ↔ Tendsto (fun y ↦ slope f x y - f') (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 0) := tendsto_congr' <| by
refine (EqOn.eventuallyEq fun y hy ↦ ?_).filter_mono inf_le_right
rw [inv_smul_smul₀ (sub_ne_zero.2 hy) f']
_ ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (L ⊓ 𝓟 {x}ᶜ) (𝓝 f') := by
rw [← nhds_translation_sub f', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
#align has_deriv_at_filter_iff_tendsto_slope hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 f') := by
simp only [HasDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin, diff_eq, ← inf_assoc, inf_principal.symm]
exact hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope' (hs : x ∉ s) :
HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 f') := by
rw [hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope, diff_singleton_eq_self hs]
#align has_deriv_within_at_iff_tendsto_slope' hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope'
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope : HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[≠] x) (𝓝 f') :=
hasDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto_slope
#align has_deriv_at_iff_tendsto_slope hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope
theorem hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero :
HasDerivAt f f' x ↔ Tendsto (fun t ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t) - f x)) (𝓝[≠] 0) (𝓝 f') := by
have : 𝓝[≠] x = Filter.map (fun t ↦ x + t) (𝓝[≠] 0) := by
simp [nhdsWithin, map_add_left_nhds_zero x, Filter.map_inf, add_right_injective x]
simp [hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope, this, slope, Function.comp]
alias ⟨HasDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero, _⟩ := hasDerivAt_iff_tendsto_slope_zero
theorem HasDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_right [PartialOrder 𝕜] (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
Tendsto (fun t ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t) - f x)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhds_right'_le_nhds_ne 0)
theorem HasDerivAt.tendsto_slope_zero_left [PartialOrder 𝕜] (h : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
Tendsto (fun t ↦ t⁻¹ • (f (x + t) - f x)) (𝓝[<] 0) (𝓝 f') :=
h.tendsto_slope_zero.mono_left (nhds_left'_le_nhds_ne 0)
theorem range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
(f : 𝕜 → F) {s t : Set 𝕜} (h : s ⊆ closure (s ∩ t)) :
range (derivWithin f s) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span 𝕜 (f '' t)) := by
rintro - ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_neBot (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) with H|H
· simp [derivWithin, fderivWithin, H]
exact subset_closure (zero_mem _)
by_cases H' : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x; swap
· rw [derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt H']
exact subset_closure (zero_mem _)
have I : (𝓝[(s ∩ t) \ {x}] x).NeBot := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot] at H ⊢
have A : closure (s \ {x}) ⊆ closure (closure (s ∩ t) \ {x}) :=
closure_mono (diff_subset_diff_left h)
have B : closure (s ∩ t) \ {x} ⊆ closure ((s ∩ t) \ {x}) := by
convert closure_diff; exact closure_singleton.symm
simpa using A.trans (closure_mono B) H
have : Tendsto (slope f x) (𝓝[(s ∩ t) \ {x}] x) (𝓝 (derivWithin f s x)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left (hasDerivWithinAt_iff_tendsto_slope.1 H'.hasDerivWithinAt)
rw [inter_comm, inter_diff_assoc]
exact nhdsWithin_mono _ inter_subset_right
rw [← closure_closure, ← Submodule.topologicalClosure_coe]
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto this
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with y hy
simp only [slope, vsub_eq_sub, SetLike.mem_coe]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.sub_mem _ ?_ ?_)
· apply Submodule.le_topologicalClosure
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hy.1.2
· apply Submodule.closure_subset_topologicalClosure_span
suffices A : f x ∈ closure (f '' (s ∩ t)) from
closure_mono (image_subset _ inter_subset_right) A
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image
· apply H'.continuousWithinAt.mono inter_subset_left
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot]
exact I.mono (nhdsWithin_mono _ diff_subset)
theorem range_deriv_subset_closure_span_image
(f : 𝕜 → F) {t : Set 𝕜} (h : Dense t) :
range (deriv f) ⊆ closure (Submodule.span 𝕜 (f '' t)) := by
rw [← derivWithin_univ]
apply range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image
simp [dense_iff_closure_eq.1 h]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Slope.lean | 145 | 151 | theorem isSeparable_range_derivWithin [SeparableSpace 𝕜] (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) :
IsSeparable (range (derivWithin f s)) := by |
obtain ⟨t, ts, t_count, ht⟩ : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ Set.Countable t ∧ s ⊆ closure t :=
(IsSeparable.of_separableSpace s).exists_countable_dense_subset
have : s ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) := by rwa [inter_eq_self_of_subset_right ts]
apply IsSeparable.mono _ (range_derivWithin_subset_closure_span_image f this)
exact (Countable.image t_count f).isSeparable.span.closure
|
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.NoncommPiCoprod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Peel
#align_import group_theory.exponent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"52fa514ec337dd970d71d8de8d0fd68b455a1e54"
universe u
variable {G : Type u}
open scoped Classical
namespace Monoid
section Monoid
variable (G) [Monoid G]
@[to_additive
"A predicate on an additive monoid saying that there is a positive integer `n` such\n
that `n • g = 0` for all `g`."]
def ExponentExists :=
∃ n, 0 < n ∧ ∀ g : G, g ^ n = 1
#align monoid.exponent_exists Monoid.ExponentExists
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists AddMonoid.ExponentExists
@[to_additive
"The exponent of an additive group is the smallest positive integer `n` such that\n
`n • g = 0` for all `g ∈ G` if it exists, otherwise it is zero by convention."]
noncomputable def exponent :=
if h : ExponentExists G then Nat.find h else 0
#align monoid.exponent Monoid.exponent
#align add_monoid.exponent AddMonoid.exponent
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoid.exponent_additive :
AddMonoid.exponent (Additive G) = exponent G := rfl
@[simp]
theorem exponent_multiplicative {G : Type*} [AddMonoid G] :
exponent (Multiplicative G) = AddMonoid.exponent G := rfl
open MulOpposite in
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.MulOpposite.exponent : exponent (MulOpposite G) = exponent G := by
simp only [Monoid.exponent, ExponentExists]
congr!
all_goals exact ⟨(op_injective <| · <| op ·), (unop_injective <| · <| unop ·)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.isOfFinOrder (h : ExponentExists G) {g : G} : IsOfFinOrder g :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by peel 2 h; exact this g
@[to_additive]
theorem ExponentExists.orderOf_pos (h : ExponentExists G) (g : G) : 0 < orderOf g :=
h.isOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_ne_zero : exponent G ≠ 0 ↔ ExponentExists G := by
rw [exponent]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, @not_lt_zero' ℕ]
--if this isn't done this way, `to_additive` freaks
· tauto
#align monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero Monoid.exponent_ne_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_exists_iff_ne_zero AddMonoid.exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_ne_zero⟩ := exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-27"))]
theorem exponentExists_iff_ne_zero : ExponentExists G ↔ exponent G ≠ 0 := exponent_ne_zero.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_pos : 0 < exponent G ↔ ExponentExists G :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans exponent_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
protected alias ⟨_, ExponentExists.exponent_pos⟩ := exponent_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff : exponent G = 0 ↔ ¬ExponentExists G :=
exponent_ne_zero.not_right
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero {g : G} (hg : orderOf g = 0) : exponent G = 0 :=
exponent_eq_zero_iff.mpr fun h ↦ h.orderOf_pos g |>.ne' hg
#align monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero Monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero
#align add_monoid.exponent_eq_zero_of_order_zero AddMonoid.exponent_eq_zero_addOrder_zero
@[to_additive "The exponent is zero iff for all nonzero `n`, one can find a `g` such that
`n • g ≠ 0`."]
theorem exponent_eq_zero_iff_forall : exponent G = 0 ↔ ∀ n > 0, ∃ g : G, g ^ n ≠ 1 := by
rw [exponent_eq_zero_iff, ExponentExists]
push_neg
rfl
@[to_additive exponent_nsmul_eq_zero]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Exponent.lean | 151 | 155 | theorem pow_exponent_eq_one (g : G) : g ^ exponent G = 1 := by |
by_cases h : ExponentExists G
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_pos h]
exact (Nat.find_spec h).2 g
· simp_rw [exponent, dif_neg h, pow_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.order.rearrangement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3f25363ae62cb169e72cd6b8b1ac97bacf21ca7"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section SMul
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Rearrangement.lean | 62 | 108 | theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by |
classical
revert hσ σ hfg
-- Porting note: Specify `p` to get around `∀ {σ}` in the current goal.
apply Finset.induction_on_max_value (fun i ↦ toLex (g i, f i))
(p := fun t ↦ ∀ {σ : Perm ι}, MonovaryOn f g t → { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ t →
(∑ i ∈ t, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i • g i) s
· simp only [le_rfl, Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
intro a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ
set τ : Perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
intro x hx
simp only [τ, Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.swap_comp_apply] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h₁ h₂
· obtain rfl | hax := eq_or_ne x a
· contradiction
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hax <| h.symm.trans h₁) hax
· exact (hx <| σ.injective h₂.symm).elim
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ hx) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h₂)
specialize hind (hfg.subset <| subset_insert _ _) hτs
simp_rw [sum_insert has]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left hind _)
obtain hσa | hσa := eq_or_ne a (σ a)
· rw [hτ, ← hσa, swap_self, trans_refl]
have h1s : σ⁻¹ a ∈ s := by
rw [Ne, ← inv_eq_iff_eq] at hσa
refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hσa ?_) hσa
rwa [apply_inv_self, eq_comm] at h
simp only [← s.sum_erase_add _ h1s, add_comm]
rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
simp only [hτ, swap_apply_left, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, apply_inv_self]
refine add_le_add (smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' ?_ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_).le
· specialize hamax (σ⁻¹ a) h1s
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hfg (mem_insert_of_mem h1s) (mem_insert_self _ _) hamax
· exact hamax.2
· specialize hamax (σ a) (mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ <| σ.injective.ne hσa.symm) hσa.symm)
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hamax.le
· exact hamax.1.le
· rw [mem_erase, Ne, eq_inv_iff_eq] at hx
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx.1 (σ.injective.ne _)]
rintro rfl
exact has hx.2
|
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Instances
#align_import data.multiset.functor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
universe u
namespace Multiset
open List
instance functor : Functor Multiset where map := @map
@[simp]
theorem fmap_def {α' β'} {s : Multiset α'} (f : α' → β') : f <$> s = s.map f :=
rfl
#align multiset.fmap_def Multiset.fmap_def
instance : LawfulFunctor Multiset where
id_map := by simp
comp_map := by simp
map_const {_ _} := rfl
open LawfulTraversable CommApplicative
variable {F : Type u → Type u} [Applicative F] [CommApplicative F]
variable {α' β' : Type u} (f : α' → F β')
def traverse : Multiset α' → F (Multiset β') := by
refine Quotient.lift (Functor.map Coe.coe ∘ Traversable.traverse f) ?_
introv p; unfold Function.comp
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| @cons x l₁ l₂ _ h =>
have :
Multiset.cons <$> f x <*> Coe.coe <$> Traversable.traverse f l₁ =
Multiset.cons <$> f x <*> Coe.coe <$> Traversable.traverse f l₂ := by rw [h]
simpa [functor_norm] using this
| swap x y l =>
have :
(fun a b (l : List β') ↦ (↑(a :: b :: l) : Multiset β')) <$> f y <*> f x =
(fun a b l ↦ ↑(a :: b :: l)) <$> f x <*> f y := by
rw [CommApplicative.commutative_map]
congr
funext a b l
simpa [flip] using Perm.swap a b l
simp [(· ∘ ·), this, functor_norm, Coe.coe]
| trans => simp [*]
#align multiset.traverse Multiset.traverse
instance : Monad Multiset :=
{ Multiset.functor with
pure := fun x ↦ {x}
bind := @bind }
@[simp]
theorem pure_def {α} : (pure : α → Multiset α) = singleton :=
rfl
#align multiset.pure_def Multiset.pure_def
@[simp]
theorem bind_def {α β} : (· >>= ·) = @bind α β :=
rfl
#align multiset.bind_def Multiset.bind_def
instance : LawfulMonad Multiset := LawfulMonad.mk'
(bind_pure_comp := fun _ _ ↦ by simp only [pure_def, bind_def, bind_singleton, fmap_def])
(id_map := fun _ ↦ by simp only [fmap_def, id_eq, map_id'])
(pure_bind := fun _ _ ↦ by simp only [pure_def, bind_def, singleton_bind])
(bind_assoc := @bind_assoc)
open Functor
open Traversable LawfulTraversable
@[simp]
theorem lift_coe {α β : Type*} (x : List α) (f : List α → β)
(h : ∀ a b : List α, a ≈ b → f a = f b) : Quotient.lift f h (x : Multiset α) = f x :=
Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
#align multiset.lift_coe Multiset.lift_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_coe {α β} (h : α → β) :
Functor.map h ∘ Coe.coe = (Coe.coe ∘ Functor.map h : List α → Multiset β) := by
funext; simp only [Function.comp_apply, Coe.coe, fmap_def, map_coe, List.map_eq_map]
#align multiset.map_comp_coe Multiset.map_comp_coe
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Functor.lean | 102 | 105 | theorem id_traverse {α : Type*} (x : Multiset α) : traverse (pure : α → Id α) x = x := by |
refine Quotient.inductionOn x ?_
intro
simp [traverse, Coe.coe]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Doubling
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
#align_import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.eq_haar from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
open TopologicalSpace Set Filter Metric Bornology
open scoped ENNReal Pointwise Topology NNReal
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01 : PositiveCompacts ℝ where
carrier := Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by simp_rw [interior_Icc, nonempty_Ioo, zero_lt_one]
#align topological_space.positive_compacts.Icc01 TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.Icc01
universe u
def TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 (ι : Type*) [Finite ι] :
PositiveCompacts (ι → ℝ) where
carrier := pi univ fun _ => Icc 0 1
isCompact' := isCompact_univ_pi fun _ => isCompact_Icc
interior_nonempty' := by
simp only [interior_pi_set, Set.toFinite, interior_Icc, univ_pi_nonempty_iff, nonempty_Ioo,
imp_true_iff, zero_lt_one]
#align topological_space.positive_compacts.pi_Icc01 TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
(Pi.basisFun ℝ ι).parallelepiped = TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by
refine Eq.trans ?_ ((uIcc_of_le ?_).trans (Set.pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm)
· classical convert parallelepiped_single (ι := ι) 1
· exact zero_le_one
#align basis.parallelepiped_basis_fun Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun
theorem Basis.parallelepiped_eq_map {ι E : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] (b : Basis ι ℝ E) :
b.parallelepiped = (PositiveCompacts.piIcc01 ι).map b.equivFun.symm
b.equivFunL.symm.continuous b.equivFunL.symm.isOpenMap := by
classical
rw [← Basis.parallelepiped_basisFun, ← Basis.parallelepiped_map]
congr with x
simp
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
theorem Basis.map_addHaar {ι E F : Type*} [Fintype ι] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [MeasurableSpace E] [MeasurableSpace F] [BorelSpace E]
[BorelSpace F] [SecondCountableTopology F] [SigmaCompactSpace F]
(b : Basis ι ℝ E) (f : E ≃L[ℝ] F) :
map f b.addHaar = (b.map f.toLinearEquiv).addHaar := by
have : IsAddHaarMeasure (map f b.addHaar) :=
AddEquiv.isAddHaarMeasure_map b.addHaar f.toAddEquiv f.continuous f.symm.continuous
rw [eq_comm, Basis.addHaar_eq_iff, Measure.map_apply f.continuous.measurable
(PositiveCompacts.isCompact _).measurableSet, Basis.coe_parallelepiped, Basis.coe_map]
erw [← image_parallelepiped, f.toEquiv.preimage_image, addHaar_self]
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure TopologicalSpace.PositiveCompacts FiniteDimensional
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume : addHaarMeasure Icc01 = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume Icc01).symm; simp [Icc01]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_measure_eq_volume MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume
theorem addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
addHaarMeasure (piIcc01 ι) = volume := by
convert (addHaarMeasure_unique volume (piIcc01 ι)).symm
simp only [piIcc01, volume_pi_pi fun _ => Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, PositiveCompacts.coe_mk,
Compacts.coe_mk, Finset.prod_const_one, ENNReal.ofReal_one, Real.volume_Icc, one_smul, sub_zero]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_measure_eq_volume_pi MeasureTheory.addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove this instance?
instance isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi (ι : Type*) [Fintype ι] :
IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (ι → ℝ)) :=
inferInstance
#align measure_theory.is_add_haar_measure_volume_pi MeasureTheory.isAddHaarMeasure_volume_pi
namespace Measure
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (sb : IsBounded s) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl ∞
calc
∞ = ∑' _ : ℕ, μ s := (ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero h).symm
_ = ∑' n : ℕ, μ ({u n} + s) := by
congr 1; ext1 n; simp only [image_add_left, measure_preimage_add, singleton_add]
_ = μ (⋃ n, {u n} + s) := Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion hs fun n => by
simpa only [image_add_left, singleton_add] using measurable_id.const_add _ h's
_ = μ (range u + s) := by rw [← iUnion_add, iUnion_singleton_eq_range]
_ < ∞ := (hu.add sb).measure_lt_top
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux
theorem addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E)
[IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {s : Set E} (u : ℕ → E) (hu : IsBounded (range u))
(hs : Pairwise (Disjoint on fun n => {u n} + s)) (h's : MeasurableSet s) : μ s = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 R) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (s ∩ closedBall 0 n) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
intro R
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates_aux μ u
(isBounded_closedBall.subset inter_subset_right) hu _ (h's.inter measurableSet_closedBall)
refine pairwise_disjoint_mono hs fun n => ?_
exact add_subset_add Subset.rfl inter_subset_left
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates
theorem addHaar_submodule {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E]
[BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] (s : Submodule ℝ E)
(hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ∉ s := by
simpa only [Submodule.eq_top_iff', not_exists, Ne, not_forall] using hs
obtain ⟨c, cpos, cone⟩ : ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ c < 1 := ⟨1 / 2, by norm_num, by norm_num⟩
have A : IsBounded (range fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) :=
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => c ^ n • x) atTop (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ) • x)) :=
(tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one cpos.le cone).smul_const x
isBounded_range_of_tendsto _ this
apply addHaar_eq_zero_of_disjoint_translates μ _ A _
(Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional s).measurableSet
intro m n hmn
simp only [Function.onFun, image_add_left, singleton_add, disjoint_left, mem_preimage,
SetLike.mem_coe]
intro y hym hyn
have A : (c ^ n - c ^ m) • x ∈ s := by
convert s.sub_mem hym hyn using 1
simp only [sub_smul, neg_sub_neg, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub]
have H : c ^ n - c ^ m ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [sub_eq_zero, Ne] using (pow_right_strictAnti cpos cone).injective.ne hmn.symm
have : x ∈ s := by
convert s.smul_mem (c ^ n - c ^ m)⁻¹ A
rw [smul_smul, inv_mul_cancel H, one_smul]
exact hx this
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_submodule MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_submodule
theorem addHaar_affineSubspace {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
(s : AffineSubspace ℝ E) (hs : s ≠ ⊤) : μ s = 0 := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· rw [AffineSubspace.bot_coe, measure_empty]
rw [Ne, ← AffineSubspace.direction_eq_top_iff_of_nonempty hne] at hs
rcases hne with ⟨x, hx : x ∈ s⟩
simpa only [AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx, vsub_eq_sub, sub_eq_add_neg,
image_add_right, neg_neg, measure_preimage_add_right] using addHaar_submodule μ s.direction hs
#align measure_theory.measure.add_haar_affine_subspace MeasureTheory.Measure.addHaar_affineSubspace
theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] {f : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ}
(hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) (μ : Measure (ι → ℝ)) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal (abs (LinearMap.det f)⁻¹) • μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
have := addHaarMeasure_unique μ (piIcc01 ι)
rw [this, addHaarMeasure_eq_volume_pi, Measure.map_smul,
Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi hf, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_linear_map_add_haar_pi_eq_smul_add_haar MeasureTheory.Measure.map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean | 242 | 267 | theorem map_linearMap_addHaar_eq_smul_addHaar {f : E →ₗ[ℝ] E} (hf : LinearMap.det f ≠ 0) :
Measure.map f μ = ENNReal.ofReal |(LinearMap.det f)⁻¹| • μ := by |
-- we reduce to the case of `E = ι → ℝ`, for which we have already proved the result using
-- matrices in `map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar`.
let ι := Fin (finrank ℝ E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by infer_instance
have : finrank ℝ E = finrank ℝ (ι → ℝ) := by simp [ι]
have e : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ := LinearEquiv.ofFinrankEq E (ι → ℝ) this
-- next line is to avoid `g` getting reduced by `simp`.
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ : ∃ g, g = (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).comp (f.comp (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E)) := ⟨_, rfl⟩
have gdet : LinearMap.det g = LinearMap.det f := by rw [hg]; exact LinearMap.det_conj f e
rw [← gdet] at hf ⊢
have fg : f = (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).comp (g.comp (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ)) := by
ext x
simp only [LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, hg]
simp only [fg, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearMap.coe_comp]
have Ce : Continuous e := (e : E →ₗ[ℝ] ι → ℝ).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
have Cg : Continuous g := LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional g
have Cesymm : Continuous e.symm := (e.symm : (ι → ℝ) →ₗ[ℝ] E).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
rw [← map_map Cesymm.measurable (Cg.comp Ce).measurable, ← map_map Cg.measurable Ce.measurable]
haveI : IsAddHaarMeasure (map e μ) := (e : E ≃+ (ι → ℝ)).isAddHaarMeasure_map μ Ce Cesymm
have ecomp : e.symm ∘ e = id := by
ext x; simp only [id, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
rw [map_linearMap_addHaar_pi_eq_smul_addHaar hf (map e μ), Measure.map_smul,
map_map Cesymm.measurable Ce.measurable, ecomp, Measure.map_id]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Midpoint
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.midpoint_zero from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"78261225eb5cedc61c5c74ecb44e5b385d13b733"
open AffineMap AffineEquiv
theorem lineMap_inv_two {R : Type*} {V P : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] (a b : P) : lineMap a b (2⁻¹ : R) = midpoint R a b :=
rfl
#align line_map_inv_two lineMap_inv_two
theorem lineMap_one_half {R : Type*} {V P : Type*} [DivisionRing R] [CharZero R] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] (a b : P) : lineMap a b (1 / 2 : R) = midpoint R a b := by
rw [one_div, lineMap_inv_two]
#align line_map_one_half lineMap_one_half
theorem homothety_invOf_two {R : Type*} {V P : Type*} [CommRing R] [Invertible (2 : R)]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] (a b : P) :
homothety a (⅟ 2 : R) b = midpoint R a b :=
rfl
#align homothety_inv_of_two homothety_invOf_two
theorem homothety_inv_two {k : Type*} {V P : Type*} [Field k] [CharZero k] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [AddTorsor V P] (a b : P) : homothety a (2⁻¹ : k) b = midpoint k a b :=
rfl
#align homothety_inv_two homothety_inv_two
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/MidpointZero.lean | 45 | 47 | theorem homothety_one_half {k : Type*} {V P : Type*} [Field k] [CharZero k] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [AddTorsor V P] (a b : P) : homothety a (1 / 2 : k) b = midpoint k a b := by |
rw [one_div, homothety_inv_two]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
#align_import order.filter.countable_Inter from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b9e46fe101fc897fb2e7edaf0bf1f09ea49eb81a"
open Set Filter
open Filter
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
class CountableInterFilter (l : Filter α) : Prop where
countable_sInter_mem : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l) → ⋂₀ S ∈ l
#align countable_Inter_filter CountableInterFilter
variable {l : Filter α} [CountableInterFilter l]
theorem countable_sInter_mem {S : Set (Set α)} (hSc : S.Countable) : ⋂₀ S ∈ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l :=
⟨fun hS _s hs => mem_of_superset hS (sInter_subset_of_mem hs),
CountableInterFilter.countable_sInter_mem _ hSc⟩
#align countable_sInter_mem countable_sInter_mem
theorem countable_iInter_mem [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ l :=
sInter_range s ▸ (countable_sInter_mem (countable_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align countable_Inter_mem countable_iInter_mem
theorem countable_bInter_mem {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable) {s : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} :
(⋂ i, ⋂ hi : i ∈ S, s i ‹_›) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, ∀ hi : i ∈ S, s i ‹_› ∈ l := by
rw [biInter_eq_iInter]
haveI := hS.toEncodable
exact countable_iInter_mem.trans Subtype.forall
#align countable_bInter_mem countable_bInter_mem
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CountableInter.lean | 65 | 68 | theorem eventually_countable_forall [Countable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p x i) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p x i := by |
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using
@countable_iInter_mem _ _ l _ _ fun i => { x | p x i }
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.MeasurableIntegral
#align_import probability.kernel.composition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b92d54a05ee592aa2c6181a4e76b1bb7cc45d0b"
open MeasureTheory
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
namespace kernel
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
section CompositionProduct
variable {γ : Type*} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {s : Set (β × γ)}
noncomputable def compProdFun (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) (a : α) (s : Set (β × γ)) :
ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun
theorem compProdFun_empty (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) (a : α) :
compProdFun κ η a ∅ = 0 := by
simp only [compProdFun, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, Set.setOf_false, measure_empty,
MeasureTheory.lintegral_const, zero_mul]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_empty ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_empty
theorem compProdFun_iUnion (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α)
(f : ℕ → Set (β × γ)) (hf_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
compProdFun κ η a (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, compProdFun κ η a (f i) := by
have h_Union :
(fun b => η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ ⋃ i, f i}) = fun b =>
η (a, b) (⋃ i, {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ f i}) := by
ext1 b
congr with c
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [compProdFun, h_Union]
have h_tsum :
(fun b => η (a, b) (⋃ i, {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ f i})) = fun b =>
∑' i, η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ f i} := by
ext1 b
rw [measure_iUnion]
· intro i j hij s hsi hsj c hcs
have hbci : {(b, c)} ⊆ f i := by rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff]; exact hsi hcs
have hbcj : {(b, c)} ⊆ f j := by rw [Set.singleton_subset_iff]; exact hsj hcs
simpa only [Set.bot_eq_empty, Set.le_eq_subset, Set.singleton_subset_iff,
Set.mem_empty_iff_false] using hf_disj hij hbci hbcj
· -- Porting note: behavior of `@` changed relative to lean 3, was
-- exact fun i => (@measurable_prod_mk_left β γ _ _ b) _ (hf_meas i)
exact fun i => (@measurable_prod_mk_left β γ _ _ b) (hf_meas i)
rw [h_tsum, lintegral_tsum]
· rfl
· intro i
have hm : MeasurableSet {p : (α × β) × γ | (p.1.2, p.2) ∈ f i} :=
measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd (hf_meas i)
exact ((measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left hm).comp measurable_prod_mk_left).aemeasurable
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_Union ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_iUnion
theorem compProdFun_tsum_right (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : compProdFun κ η a s = ∑' n, compProdFun κ (seq η n) a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun, (measure_sum_seq η _).symm]
have :
∫⁻ b, Measure.sum (fun n => seq η n (a, b)) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a =
∫⁻ b, ∑' n, seq η n (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a := by
congr
ext1 b
rw [Measure.sum_apply]
exact measurable_prod_mk_left hs
rw [this, lintegral_tsum]
exact fun n => ((measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left (κ := (seq η n))
((measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd) hs)).comp measurable_prod_mk_left).aemeasurable
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_tsum_right ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_tsum_right
theorem compProdFun_tsum_left (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (a : α)
(s : Set (β × γ)) : compProdFun κ η a s = ∑' n, compProdFun (seq κ n) η a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun, (measure_sum_seq κ _).symm, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_tsum_left ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_tsum_left
theorem compProdFun_eq_tsum (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
compProdFun κ η a s = ∑' (n) (m), compProdFun (seq κ n) (seq η m) a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun_tsum_left κ η a s, compProdFun_tsum_right _ η a hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_fun_eq_tsum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProdFun_eq_tsum
theorem measurable_compProdFun_of_finite (κ : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsFiniteKernel η] (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun a => compProdFun κ η a s := by
simp only [compProdFun]
have h_meas : Measurable (Function.uncurry fun a b => η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) := by
have :
(Function.uncurry fun a b => η (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) = fun p =>
η p {c : γ | (p.2, c) ∈ s} := by
ext1 p
rw [Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
rw [this]
exact measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left (measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd hs)
exact h_meas.lintegral_kernel_prod_right
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable_comp_prod_fun_of_finite ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable_compProdFun_of_finite
theorem measurable_compProdFun (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (hs : MeasurableSet s) : Measurable fun a => compProdFun κ η a s := by
simp_rw [compProdFun_tsum_right κ η _ hs]
refine Measurable.ennreal_tsum fun n => ?_
simp only [compProdFun]
have h_meas : Measurable (Function.uncurry fun a b => seq η n (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) := by
have :
(Function.uncurry fun a b => seq η n (a, b) {c : γ | (b, c) ∈ s}) = fun p =>
seq η n p {c : γ | (p.2, c) ∈ s} := by
ext1 p
rw [Function.uncurry_apply_pair]
rw [this]
exact measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left (measurable_fst.snd.prod_mk measurable_snd hs)
exact h_meas.lintegral_kernel_prod_right
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable_comp_prod_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable_compProdFun
open scoped Classical
noncomputable def compProd (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ) : kernel α (β × γ) :=
if h : IsSFiniteKernel κ ∧ IsSFiniteKernel η then
{ val := fun a ↦
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => compProdFun κ η a s) (compProdFun_empty κ η a)
(@compProdFun_iUnion _ _ _ _ _ _ κ η h.2 a)
property := by
have : IsSFiniteKernel κ := h.1
have : IsSFiniteKernel η := h.2
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
have :
(fun a =>
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => compProdFun κ η a s) (compProdFun_empty κ η a)
(compProdFun_iUnion κ η a) s) =
fun a => compProdFun κ η a s := by
ext1 a; rwa [Measure.ofMeasurable_apply]
rw [this]
exact measurable_compProdFun κ η hs }
else 0
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd
scoped[ProbabilityTheory] infixl:100 " ⊗ₖ " => ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd
theorem compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = compProdFun κ η a s := by
rw [compProd, dif_pos]
swap
· constructor <;> infer_instance
change
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => compProdFun κ η a s) (compProdFun_empty κ η a)
(compProdFun_iUnion κ η a) s =
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a
rw [Measure.ofMeasurable_apply _ hs]
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_apply_eq_comp_prod_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun
theorem compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_left (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
(h : ¬ IsSFiniteKernel κ) :
κ ⊗ₖ η = 0 := by
rw [compProd, dif_neg]
simp [h]
theorem compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_right (κ : kernel α β) (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
(h : ¬ IsSFiniteKernel η) :
κ ⊗ₖ η = 0 := by
rw [compProd, dif_neg]
simp [h]
theorem compProd_apply (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(κ ⊗ₖ η) a s = ∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a :=
compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun κ η a hs
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_prod_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.compProd_apply
theorem le_compProd_apply (κ : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (η : kernel (α × β) γ)
[IsSFiniteKernel η] (a : α) (s : Set (β × γ)) :
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a ≤ (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s :=
calc
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s} ∂κ a ≤
∫⁻ b, η (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s} ∂κ a :=
lintegral_mono fun _ => measure_mono fun _ h_mem => subset_toMeasurable _ _ h_mem
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a (toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s) :=
(kernel.compProd_apply_eq_compProdFun κ η a (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)).symm
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s := measure_toMeasurable s
#align probability_theory.kernel.le_comp_prod_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.le_compProd_apply
@[simp]
lemma compProd_zero_left (κ : kernel (α × β) γ) :
(0 : kernel α β) ⊗ₖ κ = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsSFiniteKernel κ
· ext a s hs
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ hs]
simp
· rw [kernel.compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_right _ _ h]
@[simp]
lemma compProd_zero_right (κ : kernel α β) (γ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace γ] :
κ ⊗ₖ (0 : kernel (α × β) γ) = 0 := by
by_cases h : IsSFiniteKernel κ
· ext a s hs
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ hs]
simp
· rw [kernel.compProd_of_not_isSFiniteKernel_left _ _ h]
open scoped ProbabilityTheory
section Comp
variable {γ : Type*} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : β → γ} {g : γ → α}
noncomputable def comp (η : kernel β γ) (κ : kernel α β) : kernel α γ where
val a := (κ a).bind η
property := (Measure.measurable_bind' (kernel.measurable _)).comp (kernel.measurable _)
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp ProbabilityTheory.kernel.comp
scoped[ProbabilityTheory] infixl:100 " ∘ₖ " => ProbabilityTheory.kernel.comp
theorem comp_apply (η : kernel β γ) (κ : kernel α β) (a : α) : (η ∘ₖ κ) a = (κ a).bind η :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.comp_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.comp_apply
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Composition.lean | 1,062 | 1,064 | theorem comp_apply' (η : kernel β γ) (κ : kernel α β) (a : α) {s : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(η ∘ₖ κ) a s = ∫⁻ b, η b s ∂κ a := by |
rw [comp_apply, Measure.bind_apply hs (kernel.measurable _)]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ
#align_import order.filter.filter_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2738d2ca56cbc63be80c3bd48e9ed90ad94e947d"
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {φ : Ultrafilter α}
open scoped Classical
namespace Filter
local notation3 "∀* "(...)", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p (Ultrafilter.toFilter φ)) => r
namespace Germ
open Ultrafilter
local notation "β*" => Germ (φ : Filter α) β
instance instGroupWithZero [GroupWithZero β] : GroupWithZero β* where
__ := instDivInvMonoid
__ := instMonoidWithZero
mul_inv_cancel f := inductionOn f fun f hf ↦ coe_eq.2 <| (φ.em fun y ↦ f y = 0).elim
(fun H ↦ (hf <| coe_eq.2 H).elim) fun H ↦ H.mono fun x ↦ mul_inv_cancel
inv_zero := coe_eq.2 <| by simp only [Function.comp, inv_zero, EventuallyEq.rfl]
instance instDivisionSemiring [DivisionSemiring β] : DivisionSemiring β* where
toSemiring := instSemiring
__ := instGroupWithZero
nnqsmul := _
instance instDivisionRing [DivisionRing β] : DivisionRing β* where
__ := instRing
__ := instDivisionSemiring
qsmul := _
instance instSemifield [Semifield β] : Semifield β* where
__ := instCommSemiring
__ := instDivisionSemiring
instance instField [Field β] : Field β* where
__ := instCommRing
__ := instDivisionRing
theorem coe_lt [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} : (f : β*) < g ↔ ∀* x, f x < g x := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_not_le, eventually_and, coe_le, eventually_not, EventuallyLE]
#align filter.germ.coe_lt Filter.Germ.coe_lt
theorem coe_pos [Preorder β] [Zero β] {f : α → β} : 0 < (f : β*) ↔ ∀* x, 0 < f x :=
coe_lt
#align filter.germ.coe_pos Filter.Germ.coe_pos
theorem const_lt [Preorder β] {x y : β} : x < y → (↑x : β*) < ↑y :=
coe_lt.mpr ∘ liftRel_const
#align filter.germ.const_lt Filter.Germ.const_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem const_lt_iff [Preorder β] {x y : β} : (↑x : β*) < ↑y ↔ x < y :=
coe_lt.trans liftRel_const_iff
#align filter.germ.const_lt_iff Filter.Germ.const_lt_iff
theorem lt_def [Preorder β] : ((· < ·) : β* → β* → Prop) = LiftRel (· < ·) := by
ext ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩
exact coe_lt
#align filter.germ.lt_def Filter.Germ.lt_def
instance isTotal [LE β] [IsTotal β (· ≤ ·)] : IsTotal β* (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun f g =>
inductionOn₂ f g fun _f _g => eventually_or.1 <| eventually_of_forall fun _x => total_of _ _ _⟩
noncomputable instance instLinearOrder [LinearOrder β] : LinearOrder β* :=
Lattice.toLinearOrder _
@[to_additive]
noncomputable instance linearOrderedCommGroup [LinearOrderedCommGroup β] :
LinearOrderedCommGroup β* where
__ := instOrderedCommGroup
__ := instLinearOrder
instance instStrictOrderedSemiring [StrictOrderedSemiring β] : StrictOrderedSemiring β* where
__ := instOrderedSemiring
__ := instOrderedAddCancelCommMonoid
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left x y z := inductionOn₃ x y z fun _f _g _h hfg hh ↦
coe_lt.2 <| (coe_lt.1 hh).mp <| (coe_lt.1 hfg).mono fun _a ↦ mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right x y z := inductionOn₃ x y z fun _f _g _h hfg hh ↦
coe_lt.2 <| (coe_lt.1 hh).mp <| (coe_lt.1 hfg).mono fun _a ↦ mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
instance instStrictOrderedCommSemiring [StrictOrderedCommSemiring β] :
StrictOrderedCommSemiring β* where
__ := instStrictOrderedSemiring
__ := instOrderedCommSemiring
instance instStrictOrderedRing [StrictOrderedRing β] : StrictOrderedRing β* where
__ := instRing
__ := instStrictOrderedSemiring
zero_le_one := const_le zero_le_one
mul_pos x y := inductionOn₂ x y fun _f _g hf hg ↦
coe_pos.2 <| (coe_pos.1 hg).mp <| (coe_pos.1 hf).mono fun _x ↦ mul_pos
instance instStrictOrderedCommRing [StrictOrderedCommRing β] : StrictOrderedCommRing β* where
__ := instStrictOrderedRing
__ := instOrderedCommRing
noncomputable instance instLinearOrderedRing [LinearOrderedRing β] : LinearOrderedRing β* where
__ := instStrictOrderedRing
__ := instLinearOrder
noncomputable instance instLinearOrderedField [LinearOrderedField β] : LinearOrderedField β* where
__ := instLinearOrderedRing
__ := instField
noncomputable instance instLinearOrderedCommRing [LinearOrderedCommRing β] :
LinearOrderedCommRing β* where
__ := instLinearOrderedRing
__ := instCommMonoid
theorem max_def [LinearOrder β] (x y : β*) : max x y = map₂ max x y :=
inductionOn₂ x y fun a b => by
rcases le_total (a : β*) b with h | h
· rw [max_eq_right h, map₂_coe, coe_eq]
exact h.mono fun i hi => (max_eq_right hi).symm
· rw [max_eq_left h, map₂_coe, coe_eq]
exact h.mono fun i hi => (max_eq_left hi).symm
#align filter.germ.max_def Filter.Germ.max_def
theorem min_def [K : LinearOrder β] (x y : β*) : min x y = map₂ min x y :=
inductionOn₂ x y fun a b => by
rcases le_total (a : β*) b with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left h, map₂_coe, coe_eq]
exact h.mono fun i hi => (min_eq_left hi).symm
· rw [min_eq_right h, map₂_coe, coe_eq]
exact h.mono fun i hi => (min_eq_right hi).symm
#align filter.germ.min_def Filter.Germ.min_def
theorem abs_def [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] (x : β*) : |x| = map abs x :=
inductionOn x fun _a => rfl
#align filter.germ.abs_def Filter.Germ.abs_def
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/FilterProduct.lean | 161 | 162 | theorem const_max [LinearOrder β] (x y : β) : (↑(max x y : β) : β*) = max ↑x ↑y := by |
rw [max_def, map₂_const]
|
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Quotient
#align_import group_theory.complement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
open Set
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H K : Subgroup G) (S T : Set G)
@[to_additive "`S` and `T` are complements if `(+) : S × T → G` is a bijection"]
def IsComplement : Prop :=
Function.Bijective fun x : S × T => x.1.1 * x.2.1
#align subgroup.is_complement Subgroup.IsComplement
#align add_subgroup.is_complement AddSubgroup.IsComplement
@[to_additive "`H` and `K` are complements if `(+) : H × K → G` is a bijection"]
abbrev IsComplement' :=
IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G)
#align subgroup.is_complement' Subgroup.IsComplement'
#align add_subgroup.is_complement' AddSubgroup.IsComplement'
@[to_additive "The set of left-complements of `T : Set G`"]
def leftTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ S : Set G | IsComplement S T }
#align subgroup.left_transversals Subgroup.leftTransversals
#align add_subgroup.left_transversals AddSubgroup.leftTransversals
@[to_additive "The set of right-complements of `S : Set G`"]
def rightTransversals : Set (Set G) :=
{ T : Set G | IsComplement S T }
#align subgroup.right_transversals Subgroup.rightTransversals
#align add_subgroup.right_transversals AddSubgroup.rightTransversals
variable {H K S T}
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_def : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement (H : Set G) (K : Set G) :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.is_complement'_def Subgroup.isComplement'_def
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_def AddSubgroup.isComplement'_def
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_iff_existsUnique :
IsComplement S T ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
Function.bijective_iff_existsUnique _
#align subgroup.is_complement_iff_exists_unique Subgroup.isComplement_iff_existsUnique
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_iff_exists_unique AddSubgroup.isComplement_iff_existsUnique
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement.existsUnique (h : IsComplement S T) (g : G) :
∃! x : S × T, x.1.1 * x.2.1 = g :=
isComplement_iff_existsUnique.mp h g
#align subgroup.is_complement.exists_unique Subgroup.IsComplement.existsUnique
#align add_subgroup.is_complement.exists_unique AddSubgroup.IsComplement.existsUnique
@[to_additive]
theorem IsComplement'.symm (h : IsComplement' H K) : IsComplement' K H := by
let ϕ : H × K ≃ K × H :=
Equiv.mk (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩) (fun x => ⟨x.2⁻¹, x.1⁻¹⟩)
(fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)) fun x => Prod.ext (inv_inv _) (inv_inv _)
let ψ : G ≃ G := Equiv.mk (fun g : G => g⁻¹) (fun g : G => g⁻¹) inv_inv inv_inv
suffices hf : (ψ ∘ fun x : H × K => x.1.1 * x.2.1) = (fun x : K × H => x.1.1 * x.2.1) ∘ ϕ by
rw [isComplement'_def, IsComplement, ← Equiv.bijective_comp ϕ]
apply (congr_arg Function.Bijective hf).mp -- Porting note: This was a `rw` in mathlib3
rwa [ψ.comp_bijective]
exact funext fun x => mul_inv_rev _ _
#align subgroup.is_complement'.symm Subgroup.IsComplement'.symm
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'.symm AddSubgroup.IsComplement'.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement'_comm : IsComplement' H K ↔ IsComplement' K H :=
⟨IsComplement'.symm, IsComplement'.symm⟩
#align subgroup.is_complement'_comm Subgroup.isComplement'_comm
#align add_subgroup.is_complement'_comm AddSubgroup.isComplement'_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_singleton {g : G} : IsComplement (univ : Set G) {g} :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ h => Prod.ext (Subtype.ext (mul_right_cancel h)) rfl, fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨x * g⁻¹, ⟨⟩⟩, g, rfl⟩, inv_mul_cancel_right x g⟩⟩
#align subgroup.is_complement_top_singleton Subgroup.isComplement_univ_singleton
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_top_singleton AddSubgroup.isComplement_univ_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_univ {g : G} : IsComplement ({g} : Set G) univ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_, rfl⟩, _⟩ h => Prod.ext rfl (Subtype.ext (mul_left_cancel h)), fun x =>
⟨⟨⟨g, rfl⟩, g⁻¹ * x, ⟨⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel_left g x⟩⟩
#align subgroup.is_complement_singleton_top Subgroup.isComplement_singleton_univ
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_singleton_top AddSubgroup.isComplement_singleton_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_left {g : G} : IsComplement {g} S ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => (congr_arg _ h).mpr isComplement_singleton_univ⟩
obtain ⟨⟨⟨z, rfl : z = g⟩, y, _⟩, hy⟩ := h.2 (g * x)
rwa [← mul_left_cancel hy]
#align subgroup.is_complement_singleton_left Subgroup.isComplement_singleton_left
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_singleton_left AddSubgroup.isComplement_singleton_left
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_singleton_right {g : G} : IsComplement S {g} ↔ S = univ := by
refine
⟨fun h => top_le_iff.mp fun x _ => ?_, fun h => h ▸ isComplement_univ_singleton⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h.2 (x * g)
conv_rhs at hy => rw [← show y.2.1 = g from y.2.2]
rw [← mul_right_cancel hy]
exact y.1.2
#align subgroup.is_complement_singleton_right Subgroup.isComplement_singleton_right
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_singleton_right AddSubgroup.isComplement_singleton_right
@[to_additive]
theorem isComplement_univ_left : IsComplement univ S ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.2.1, a.2.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩, ⟨a, ha⟩⟩ : (⊤ : Set G) × S) = ⟨⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((inv_mul_self a).trans (inv_mul_self b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).2
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_univ_singleton
#align subgroup.is_complement_top_left Subgroup.isComplement_univ_left
#align add_subgroup.is_complement_top_left AddSubgroup.isComplement_univ_left
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Complement.lean | 158 | 167 | theorem isComplement_univ_right : IsComplement S univ ↔ ∃ g : G, S = {g} := by |
refine
⟨fun h => Set.exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.mpr ⟨?_, fun a ha b hb => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, _⟩ := h.2 1
exact ⟨a.1.1, a.1.2⟩
· have : (⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨_, mem_top a⁻¹⟩⟩ : S × (⊤ : Set G)) = ⟨⟨b, hb⟩, ⟨_, mem_top b⁻¹⟩⟩ :=
h.1 ((mul_inv_self a).trans (mul_inv_self b).symm)
exact Subtype.ext_iff.mp (Prod.ext_iff.mp this).1
· rintro ⟨g, rfl⟩
exact isComplement_singleton_univ
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Bilinear
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.mul from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d608fc5d4e69d4cc21885913fb573a88b0deb521"
open scoped Classical
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
section SMul
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F]
variable {c : E → 𝕜'} {c' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.smul (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp x <| hc.prod hf
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.smul HasStrictFDerivAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.smul (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x <| hc.prod hf
#align has_fderiv_within_at.smul HasFDerivWithinAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.smul (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp x <| hc.prod hf
#align has_fderiv_at.smul HasFDerivAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.smul (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.smul DifferentiableWithinAt.smul
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul hf.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.smul DifferentiableAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.smul (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).smul (hf x hx)
#align differentiable_on.smul DifferentiableOn.smul
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.smul (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c y • f y := fun x => (hc x).smul (hf x)
#align differentiable.smul Differentiable.smul
theorem fderivWithin_smul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s x =
c x • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).smulRight (f x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_smul fderivWithin_smul
theorem fderiv_smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) x = c x • fderiv 𝕜 f x + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smulRight (f x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul hf.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
#align fderiv_smul fderiv_smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.smul_const (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (f : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f) (c'.smulRight f) x := by
simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (hasStrictFDerivAt_const f x)
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.smul_const HasStrictFDerivAt.smul_const
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Mul.lean | 313 | 315 | theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.smul_const (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (f : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f) (c'.smulRight f) s x := by |
simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (hasFDerivWithinAt_const f x s)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Derivation
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.pderiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
universe u v
namespace MvPolynomial
open Set Function Finsupp
variable {R : Type u} {σ : Type v} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section PDeriv
variable [CommSemiring R]
def pderiv (i : σ) : Derivation R (MvPolynomial σ R) (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
mkDerivation R <| Pi.single i 1
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv MvPolynomial.pderiv
theorem pderiv_def [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) : pderiv i = mkDerivation R (Pi.single i 1) := by
unfold pderiv; congr!
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_def MvPolynomial.pderiv_def
@[simp]
theorem pderiv_monomial {i : σ} :
pderiv i (monomial s a) = monomial (s - single i 1) (a * s i) := by
classical
simp only [pderiv_def, mkDerivation_monomial, Finsupp.smul_sum, smul_eq_mul, ← smul_mul_assoc,
← (monomial _).map_smul]
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single i (fun j _ hne => ?_) fun hi => ?_).trans ?_
· simp [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hne]
· rw [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff] at hi; simp [hi]
· simp
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_monomial MvPolynomial.pderiv_monomial
theorem pderiv_C {i : σ} : pderiv i (C a) = 0 :=
derivation_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_C MvPolynomial.pderiv_C
theorem pderiv_one {i : σ} : pderiv i (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := pderiv_C
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_one MvPolynomial.pderiv_one
@[simp]
theorem pderiv_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) :
pderiv i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = Pi.single (f := fun j => _) i 1 j := by
rw [pderiv_def, mkDerivation_X]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.pderiv_X MvPolynomial.pderiv_X
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/PDeriv.lean | 96 | 96 | theorem pderiv_X_self (i : σ) : pderiv i (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by | classical simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.InjectiveResolution
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.HomotopyCategory
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import category_theory.abelian.injective_resolution from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Category Limits
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
open Injective
namespace InjectiveResolution
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `InjectiveResolution`
section
variable [HasZeroObject C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
def descFZero {Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution Y) (J : InjectiveResolution Z) :
J.cocomplex.X 0 ⟶ I.cocomplex.X 0 :=
factorThru (f ≫ I.ι.f 0) (J.ι.f 0)
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_f_zero CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descFZero
end
section Abelian
variable [Abelian C]
lemma exact₀ {Z : C} (I : InjectiveResolution Z) :
(ShortComplex.mk _ _ I.ι_f_zero_comp_complex_d).Exact :=
ShortComplex.exact_of_f_is_kernel _ I.isLimitKernelFork
def descFOne {Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution Y) (J : InjectiveResolution Z) :
J.cocomplex.X 1 ⟶ I.cocomplex.X 1 :=
J.exact₀.descToInjective (descFZero f I J ≫ I.cocomplex.d 0 1)
(by dsimp; simp [← assoc, assoc, descFZero])
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_f_one CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descFOne
@[simp]
theorem descFOne_zero_comm {Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution Y)
(J : InjectiveResolution Z) :
J.cocomplex.d 0 1 ≫ descFOne f I J = descFZero f I J ≫ I.cocomplex.d 0 1 := by
apply J.exact₀.comp_descToInjective
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_f_one_zero_comm CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descFOne_zero_comm
def descFSucc {Y Z : C} (I : InjectiveResolution Y) (J : InjectiveResolution Z) (n : ℕ)
(g : J.cocomplex.X n ⟶ I.cocomplex.X n) (g' : J.cocomplex.X (n + 1) ⟶ I.cocomplex.X (n + 1))
(w : J.cocomplex.d n (n + 1) ≫ g' = g ≫ I.cocomplex.d n (n + 1)) :
Σ'g'' : J.cocomplex.X (n + 2) ⟶ I.cocomplex.X (n + 2),
J.cocomplex.d (n + 1) (n + 2) ≫ g'' = g' ≫ I.cocomplex.d (n + 1) (n + 2) :=
⟨(J.exact_succ n).descToInjective
(g' ≫ I.cocomplex.d (n + 1) (n + 2)) (by simp [reassoc_of% w]),
(J.exact_succ n).comp_descToInjective _ _⟩
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_f_succ CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descFSucc
def desc {Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution Y) (J : InjectiveResolution Z) :
J.cocomplex ⟶ I.cocomplex :=
CochainComplex.mkHom _ _ (descFZero f _ _) (descFOne f _ _) (descFOne_zero_comm f I J).symm
fun n ⟨g, g', w⟩ => ⟨(descFSucc I J n g g' w.symm).1, (descFSucc I J n g g' w.symm).2.symm⟩
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.desc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem desc_commutes {Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution Y)
(J : InjectiveResolution Z) : J.ι ≫ desc f I J = (CochainComplex.single₀ C).map f ≫ I.ι := by
ext
simp [desc, descFOne, descFZero]
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_commutes CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.desc_commutes
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma desc_commutes_zero {Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ Y)
(I : InjectiveResolution Y) (J : InjectiveResolution Z) :
J.ι.f 0 ≫ (desc f I J).f 0 = f ≫ I.ι.f 0 :=
(HomologicalComplex.congr_hom (desc_commutes f I J) 0).trans (by simp)
-- Now that we've checked this property of the descent, we can seal away the actual definition.
def descHomotopyZeroZero {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι ≫ f = 0) : I.cocomplex.X 1 ⟶ J.cocomplex.X 0 :=
I.exact₀.descToInjective (f.f 0) (congr_fun (congr_arg HomologicalComplex.Hom.f comm) 0)
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_homotopy_zero_zero CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descHomotopyZeroZero
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma comp_descHomotopyZeroZero {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι ≫ f = 0) :
I.cocomplex.d 0 1 ≫ descHomotopyZeroZero f comm = f.f 0 :=
I.exact₀.comp_descToInjective _ _
def descHomotopyZeroOne {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι ≫ f = (0 : _ ⟶ J.cocomplex)) :
I.cocomplex.X 2 ⟶ J.cocomplex.X 1 :=
(I.exact_succ 0).descToInjective (f.f 1 - descHomotopyZeroZero f comm ≫ J.cocomplex.d 0 1)
(by rw [Preadditive.comp_sub, comp_descHomotopyZeroZero_assoc f comm,
HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm, sub_self])
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_homotopy_zero_one CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descHomotopyZeroOne
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma comp_descHomotopyZeroOne {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι ≫ f = (0 : _ ⟶ J.cocomplex)) :
I.cocomplex.d 1 2 ≫ descHomotopyZeroOne f comm =
f.f 1 - descHomotopyZeroZero f comm ≫ J.cocomplex.d 0 1 :=
(I.exact_succ 0).comp_descToInjective _ _
def descHomotopyZeroSucc {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (n : ℕ) (g : I.cocomplex.X (n + 1) ⟶ J.cocomplex.X n)
(g' : I.cocomplex.X (n + 2) ⟶ J.cocomplex.X (n + 1))
(w : f.f (n + 1) = I.cocomplex.d (n + 1) (n + 2) ≫ g' + g ≫ J.cocomplex.d n (n + 1)) :
I.cocomplex.X (n + 3) ⟶ J.cocomplex.X (n + 2) :=
(I.exact_succ (n + 1)).descToInjective (f.f (n + 2) - g' ≫ J.cocomplex.d _ _) (by
dsimp
rw [Preadditive.comp_sub, ← HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm, w, Preadditive.add_comp,
Category.assoc, Category.assoc, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d, comp_zero,
add_zero, sub_self])
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_homotopy_zero_succ CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descHomotopyZeroSucc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma comp_descHomotopyZeroSucc {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (n : ℕ) (g : I.cocomplex.X (n + 1) ⟶ J.cocomplex.X n)
(g' : I.cocomplex.X (n + 2) ⟶ J.cocomplex.X (n + 1))
(w : f.f (n + 1) = I.cocomplex.d (n + 1) (n + 2) ≫ g' + g ≫ J.cocomplex.d n (n + 1)) :
I.cocomplex.d (n+2) (n+3) ≫ descHomotopyZeroSucc f n g g' w =
f.f (n + 2) - g' ≫ J.cocomplex.d _ _ :=
(I.exact_succ (n+1)).comp_descToInjective _ _
def descHomotopyZero {Y Z : C} {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(f : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι ≫ f = 0) : Homotopy f 0 :=
Homotopy.mkCoinductive _ (descHomotopyZeroZero f comm) (by simp)
(descHomotopyZeroOne f comm) (by simp) (fun n ⟨g, g', w⟩ =>
⟨descHomotopyZeroSucc f n g g' (by simp only [w, add_comm]), by simp⟩)
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_homotopy_zero CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descHomotopyZero
def descHomotopy {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) {I : InjectiveResolution Y} {J : InjectiveResolution Z}
(g h : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (g_comm : I.ι ≫ g = (CochainComplex.single₀ C).map f ≫ J.ι)
(h_comm : I.ι ≫ h = (CochainComplex.single₀ C).map f ≫ J.ι) : Homotopy g h :=
Homotopy.equivSubZero.invFun (descHomotopyZero _ (by simp [g_comm, h_comm]))
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_homotopy CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descHomotopy
def descIdHomotopy (X : C) (I : InjectiveResolution X) :
Homotopy (desc (𝟙 X) I I) (𝟙 I.cocomplex) := by
apply descHomotopy (𝟙 X) <;> simp
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_id_homotopy CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descIdHomotopy
def descCompHomotopy {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (I : InjectiveResolution X)
(J : InjectiveResolution Y) (K : InjectiveResolution Z) :
Homotopy (desc (f ≫ g) K I) (desc f J I ≫ desc g K J) := by
apply descHomotopy (f ≫ g) <;> simp
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.desc_comp_homotopy CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.descCompHomotopy
-- We don't care about the actual definitions of these homotopies.
def homotopyEquiv {X : C} (I J : InjectiveResolution X) :
HomotopyEquiv I.cocomplex J.cocomplex where
hom := desc (𝟙 X) J I
inv := desc (𝟙 X) I J
homotopyHomInvId := (descCompHomotopy (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) I J I).symm.trans <| by
simpa [id_comp] using descIdHomotopy _ _
homotopyInvHomId := (descCompHomotopy (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) J I J).symm.trans <| by
simpa [id_comp] using descIdHomotopy _ _
#align category_theory.InjectiveResolution.homotopy_equiv CategoryTheory.InjectiveResolution.homotopyEquiv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/InjectiveResolution.lean | 206 | 207 | theorem homotopyEquiv_hom_ι {X : C} (I J : InjectiveResolution X) :
I.ι ≫ (homotopyEquiv I J).hom = J.ι := by | simp [homotopyEquiv]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_neg_I Complex.arg_neg_I
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (abs.ne_zero h)]
#align complex.tan_arg Complex.tan_arg
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_nonneg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [abs.nonneg]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
#align complex.arg_eq_zero_iff Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
#align complex.arg_lt_pi_iff Complex.arg_lt_pi_iff
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_neg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
#align complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
if_pos hx
#align complex.arg_of_re_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
#align complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero Complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align complex.arg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
#align complex.arg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, abs_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
#align complex.arg_conj Complex.arg_conj
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
#align complex.arg_inv Complex.arg_inv
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma abs_eq_one_iff' : abs x = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [abs_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using abs_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
_root_.abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
#align complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
#align complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff Complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff]
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
#align complex.arg_conj_coe_angle Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
#align complex.arg_inv_coe_angle Complex.arg_inv_coe_angle
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_coe_angle {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : (arg (-x) : Real.Angle) = arg x + π := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg hi, Real.Angle.coe_add]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le, ←
Real.Angle.coe_add, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· exact False.elim (hx (ext hr hi))
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr),
Real.Angle.coe_zero, zero_add]
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos hi, Real.Angle.coe_sub, Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi]
#align complex.arg_neg_coe_angle Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
have hi : toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ θ
ring
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I hr hi using 3
simp [toIocMod, cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi, sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod hr, toIocMod_sub_self, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor,
zsmul_eq_mul]
ring_nf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (r * (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I)) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
induction' θ using Real.Angle.induction_on with θ
rw [Real.Angle.cos_coe, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋
exact mod_cast arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub hr θ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 541 | 549 | theorem arg_mul_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x * y) : Real.Angle) = arg x + arg y := by |
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (mul_pos (abs.pos hx) (abs.pos hy))
(arg x + arg y : Real.Angle) using
3
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_add, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.cos_coe, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin,
cos_add_sin_I, ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (exp _), ← mul_assoc (abs y : ℂ), abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I, mul_comm y, ←
mul_assoc, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Internal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import algebra.monoid_algebra.grading from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"feb99064803fd3108e37c18b0f77d0a8344677a3"
noncomputable section
namespace AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {M : Type*} {ι : Type*} {R : Type*}
section
variable (R) [CommSemiring R]
abbrev gradeBy (f : M → ι) (i : ι) : Submodule R R[M] where
carrier := { a | ∀ m, m ∈ a.support → f m = i }
zero_mem' m h := by cases h
add_mem' {a b} ha hb m h := by
classical exact (Finset.mem_union.mp (Finsupp.support_add h)).elim (ha m) (hb m)
smul_mem' a m h := Set.Subset.trans Finsupp.support_smul h
#align add_monoid_algebra.grade_by AddMonoidAlgebra.gradeBy
abbrev grade (m : M) : Submodule R R[M] :=
gradeBy R id m
#align add_monoid_algebra.grade AddMonoidAlgebra.grade
theorem gradeBy_id : gradeBy R (id : M → M) = grade R := rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.grade_by_id AddMonoidAlgebra.gradeBy_id
theorem mem_gradeBy_iff (f : M → ι) (i : ι) (a : R[M]) :
a ∈ gradeBy R f i ↔ (a.support : Set M) ⊆ f ⁻¹' {i} := by rfl
#align add_monoid_algebra.mem_grade_by_iff AddMonoidAlgebra.mem_gradeBy_iff
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Grading.lean | 67 | 69 | theorem mem_grade_iff (m : M) (a : R[M]) : a ∈ grade R m ↔ a.support ⊆ {m} := by |
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finset.coe_singleton]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Order
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2d5739b61641ee4e7e53eca5688a08f66f2e6a60"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Ring
variable [Ring R]
protected def inv.aux : R → R⟦X⟧ → R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.inv.aux
#align power_series.inv.aux PowerSeries.inv.aux
theorem coeff_inv_aux (n : ℕ) (a : R) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
coeff R n (inv.aux a φ) =
if n = 0 then a
else
-a *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (inv.aux a φ) else 0 := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [coeff, inv.aux, MvPowerSeries.coeff_inv_aux]
simp only [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
split_ifs; · rfl
congr 1
symm
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun (a, b) ↦ (single () a, single () b))
fun (f, g) ↦ (f (), g ())
· aesop
· aesop
· aesop
· aesop
· rintro ⟨i, j⟩ _hij
obtain H | H := le_or_lt n j
· aesop
rw [if_pos H, if_pos]
· rfl
refine ⟨?_, fun hh ↦ H.not_le ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨⟩
simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using le_of_lt H
· simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_same] using hh ()
#align power_series.coeff_inv_aux PowerSeries.coeff_inv_aux
def invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) : R⟦X⟧ :=
MvPowerSeries.invOfUnit φ u
#align power_series.inv_of_unit PowerSeries.invOfUnit
theorem coeff_invOfUnit (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) :
coeff R n (invOfUnit φ u) =
if n = 0 then ↑u⁻¹
else
-↑u⁻¹ *
∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n,
if x.2 < n then coeff R x.1 φ * coeff R x.2 (invOfUnit φ u) else 0 :=
coeff_inv_aux n (↑u⁻¹ : R) φ
#align power_series.coeff_inv_of_unit PowerSeries.coeff_invOfUnit
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Inverse.lean | 100 | 102 | theorem constantCoeff_invOfUnit (φ : R⟦X⟧) (u : Rˣ) :
constantCoeff R (invOfUnit φ u) = ↑u⁻¹ := by |
rw [← coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply, coeff_invOfUnit, if_pos rfl]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.PiLex
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.fin.tuple.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ef997baa41b5c428be3fb50089a7139bf4ee886b"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
#align fin.tuple0_le Fin.tuple0_le
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
#align fin.tail Fin.tail
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
#align fin.tail_def Fin.tail_def
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
#align fin.cons Fin.cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [tail, cons]
#align fin.tail_cons Fin.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_succ Fin.cons_succ
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 82 | 82 | theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by | simp [cons]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Unique
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable (A : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} A]
abbrev HasWeakSheafify : Prop := (sheafToPresheaf J A).IsRightAdjoint
class HasSheafify : Prop where
isRightAdjoint : HasWeakSheafify J A
isLeftExact : Nonempty (PreservesFiniteLimits ((sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint))
instance [HasSheafify J A] : HasWeakSheafify J A := HasSheafify.isRightAdjoint
noncomputable section
instance [HasSheafify J A] : PreservesFiniteLimits ((sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint) :=
HasSheafify.isLeftExact.some
theorem HasSheafify.mk' {F : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A} (adj : F ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A)
[PreservesFiniteLimits F] : HasSheafify J A where
isRightAdjoint := ⟨F, ⟨adj⟩⟩
isLeftExact := ⟨by
have : (sheafToPresheaf J A).IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
exact ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ preservesLimitsOfShapeOfNatIso
(adj.leftAdjointUniq (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint (sheafToPresheaf J A)))⟩⟩
def presheafToSheaf [HasWeakSheafify J A] : (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) ⥤ Sheaf J A :=
(sheafToPresheaf J A).leftAdjoint
instance [HasSheafify J A] : PreservesFiniteLimits (presheafToSheaf J A) :=
HasSheafify.isLeftExact.some
def sheafificationAdjunction [HasWeakSheafify J A] :
presheafToSheaf J A ⊣ sheafToPresheaf J A := Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint _
instance [HasWeakSheafify J A] : (presheafToSheaf J A).IsLeftAdjoint :=
⟨_, ⟨sheafificationAdjunction J A⟩⟩
end
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] [HasWeakSheafify J D]
noncomputable abbrev sheafify (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D :=
presheafToSheaf J D |>.obj P |>.val
noncomputable abbrev toSheafify (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : P ⟶ sheafify J P :=
sheafificationAdjunction J D |>.unit.app P
@[simp]
theorem sheafificationAdjunction_unit_app (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
(sheafificationAdjunction J D).unit.app P = toSheafify J P := rfl
noncomputable abbrev sheafifyMap {P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) : sheafify J P ⟶ sheafify J Q :=
presheafToSheaf J D |>.map η |>.val
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheafification.lean | 96 | 97 | theorem sheafifyMap_id (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) : sheafifyMap J (𝟙 P) = 𝟙 (sheafify J P) := by |
simp [sheafifyMap, sheafify]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
#align_import ring_theory.hahn_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a484a7d0eade4e1268f4fb402859b6686037f965"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
@[ext]
structure HahnSeries (Γ : Type*) (R : Type*) [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R] where
coeff : Γ → R
isPWO_support' : (Function.support coeff).IsPWO
#align hahn_series HahnSeries
variable {Γ : Type*} {R : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Zero
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : HahnSeries Γ R → Γ → R) :=
HahnSeries.ext
#align hahn_series.coeff_injective HahnSeries.coeff_injective
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj {x y : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = y.coeff ↔ x = y :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
#align hahn_series.coeff_inj HahnSeries.coeff_inj
nonrec def support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Set Γ :=
support x.coeff
#align hahn_series.support HahnSeries.support
@[simp]
theorem isPWO_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsPWO :=
x.isPWO_support'
#align hahn_series.is_pwo_support HahnSeries.isPWO_support
@[simp]
theorem isWF_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsWF :=
x.isPWO_support.isWF
#align hahn_series.is_wf_support HahnSeries.isWF_support
@[simp]
theorem mem_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (a : Γ) : a ∈ x.support ↔ x.coeff a ≠ 0 :=
Iff.refl _
#align hahn_series.mem_support HahnSeries.mem_support
instance : Zero (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨{ coeff := 0
isPWO_support' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨fun a b => a.ext b (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_coeff {a : Γ} : (0 : HahnSeries Γ R).coeff a = 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.zero_coeff HahnSeries.zero_coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff' rfl
#align hahn_series.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
mt (fun x0 => (x0.symm ▸ zero_coeff : x.coeff g = 0)) h
#align hahn_series.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero HahnSeries.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : support (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ∅ :=
Function.support_zero
#align hahn_series.support_zero HahnSeries.support_zero
@[simp]
nonrec theorem support_nonempty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support.Nonempty ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [support, support_nonempty_iff, Ne, coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff]
#align hahn_series.support_nonempty_iff HahnSeries.support_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support = ∅ ↔ x = 0 :=
support_eq_empty_iff.trans coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
#align hahn_series.support_eq_empty_iff HahnSeries.support_eq_empty_iff
def ofIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R)) :
HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
coeff := fun g => coeff (coeff x g.1) g.2
isPWO_support' := by
refine Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.subsetProdLex ?_ ?_
· refine Set.IsPWO.mono x.isPWO_support' ?_
simp_rw [Set.image_subset_iff, support_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Function.mem_support]
exact fun _ ↦ ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
· exact fun a => by simpa [Function.mem_support, ne_eq] using (x.coeff a).isPWO_support'
@[simp]
lemma mk_eq_zero (f : Γ → R) (h) : HahnSeries.mk f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [HahnSeries.ext_iff]
rfl
def toIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R) :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) where
coeff := fun g => {
coeff := fun g' => coeff x (g, g')
isPWO_support' := Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g
}
isPWO_support' := by
have h₁ : (Function.support fun g => HahnSeries.mk (fun g' => x.coeff (g, g'))
(Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g)) = Function.support
fun g => fun g' => x.coeff (g, g') := by
simp only [Function.support, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero]
rw [h₁, Function.support_curry' x.coeff]
exact Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.imageProdLex x.isPWO_support'
@[simps]
def iterateEquiv {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) ≃ HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
toFun := ofIterate
invFun := toIterate
left_inv := congrFun rfl
right_inv := congrFun rfl
def single (a : Γ) : ZeroHom R (HahnSeries Γ R) where
toFun r :=
{ coeff := Pi.single a r
isPWO_support' := (Set.isPWO_singleton a).mono Pi.support_single_subset }
map_zero' := HahnSeries.ext _ _ (Pi.single_zero _)
#align hahn_series.single HahnSeries.single
variable {a b : Γ} {r : R}
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_same (a : Γ) (r : R) : (single a r).coeff a = r :=
Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ => R) a r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_same HahnSeries.single_coeff_same
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_of_ne (h : b ≠ a) : (single a r).coeff b = 0 :=
Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) h r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_of_ne HahnSeries.single_coeff_of_ne
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Basic.lean | 188 | 189 | theorem single_coeff : (single a r).coeff b = if b = a then r else 0 := by |
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.MooreComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.FunctorCategories
#align_import algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88bca0ce5d22ebfd9e73e682e51d60ea13b48347"
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Idempotents
open Opposite
open Simplicial
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace AlternatingFaceMapComplex
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
variable (X : SimplicialObject C)
variable (Y : SimplicialObject C)
@[simp]
def objD (n : ℕ) : X _[n + 1] ⟶ X _[n] :=
∑ i : Fin (n + 2), (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ) • X.δ i
#align algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex.obj_d AlgebraicTopology.AlternatingFaceMapComplex.objD
theorem d_squared (n : ℕ) : objD X (n + 1) ≫ objD X n = 0 := by
-- we start by expanding d ≫ d as a double sum
dsimp
simp only [comp_sum, sum_comp, ← Finset.sum_product']
-- then, we decompose the index set P into a subset S and its complement Sᶜ
let P := Fin (n + 2) × Fin (n + 3)
let S := Finset.univ.filter fun ij : P => (ij.2 : ℕ) ≤ (ij.1 : ℕ)
erw [← Finset.sum_add_sum_compl S, ← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← Finset.sum_neg_distrib]
let φ : ∀ ij : P, ij ∈ S → P := fun ij hij =>
(Fin.castLT ij.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Finset.mem_filter.mp hij).right (Fin.is_lt ij.1)), ij.1.succ)
apply Finset.sum_bij φ
· -- φ(S) is contained in Sᶜ
intro ij hij
simp only [S, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.compl_filter, Finset.mem_filter, true_and_iff,
Fin.val_succ, Fin.coe_castLT] at hij ⊢
linarith
· -- φ : S → Sᶜ is injective
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij ⟨i', j'⟩ hij' h
rw [Prod.mk.inj_iff]
exact ⟨by simpa using congr_arg Prod.snd h,
by simpa [Fin.castSucc_castLT] using congr_arg Fin.castSucc (congr_arg Prod.fst h)⟩
· -- φ : S → Sᶜ is surjective
rintro ⟨i', j'⟩ hij'
simp only [S, Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Prod.forall, ge_iff_le, Finset.compl_filter,
not_le, Finset.mem_filter, true_and] at hij'
refine ⟨(j'.pred <| ?_, Fin.castSucc i'), ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
simp only [Fin.val_zero, not_lt_zero'] at hij'
· simpa only [S, Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Prod.forall, ge_iff_le, Finset.mem_filter,
Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.coe_pred, true_and] using Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hij'
· simp only [φ, Fin.castLT_castSucc, Fin.succ_pred]
· -- identification of corresponding terms in both sums
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
dsimp
simp only [zsmul_comp, comp_zsmul, smul_smul, ← neg_smul]
congr 1
· simp only [Fin.val_succ, pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg, neg_neg, mul_one]
apply mul_comm
· rw [CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ'']
simpa [S] using hij
#align algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex.d_squared AlgebraicTopology.AlternatingFaceMapComplex.d_squared
def obj : ChainComplex C ℕ :=
ChainComplex.of (fun n => X _[n]) (objD X) (d_squared X)
#align algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex.obj AlgebraicTopology.AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj
@[simp]
theorem obj_X (X : SimplicialObject C) (n : ℕ) : (AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj X).X n = X _[n] :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex.obj_X AlgebraicTopology.AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj_X
@[simp]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/AlternatingFaceMapComplex.lean | 132 | 135 | theorem obj_d_eq (X : SimplicialObject C) (n : ℕ) :
(AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj X).d (n + 1) n
= ∑ i : Fin (n + 2), (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ) • X.δ i := by |
apply ChainComplex.of_d
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.