Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Subfield
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.RankNullity
#align_import linear_algebra.dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a5f8186becdbc826190ced4312f8199f9db6a5"
noncomputable section
universe u₀ u v v' v'' u₁' w w'
variable {K R : Type u} {V V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type v} {V' V'₁ : Type v'} {V'' : Type v''}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set
section Module
section Basis
open FiniteDimensional
variable [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
theorem linearIndependent_of_top_le_span_of_card_eq_finrank {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → V}
(spans : ⊤ ≤ span K (Set.range b)) (card_eq : Fintype.card ι = finrank K V) :
LinearIndependent K b :=
linearIndependent_iff'.mpr fun s g dependent i i_mem_s => by
classical
by_contra gx_ne_zero
-- We'll derive a contradiction by showing `b '' (univ \ {i})` of cardinality `n - 1`
-- spans a vector space of dimension `n`.
refine not_le_of_gt (span_lt_top_of_card_lt_finrank
(show (b '' (Set.univ \ {i})).toFinset.card < finrank K V from ?_)) ?_
· calc
(b '' (Set.univ \ {i})).toFinset.card = ((Set.univ \ {i}).toFinset.image b).card := by
rw [Set.toFinset_card, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
_ ≤ (Set.univ \ {i}).toFinset.card := Finset.card_image_le
_ = (Finset.univ.erase i).card := (congr_arg Finset.card (Finset.ext (by simp [and_comm])))
_ < Finset.univ.card := Finset.card_erase_lt_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ i)
_ = finrank K V := card_eq
-- We already have that `b '' univ` spans the whole space,
-- so we only need to show that the span of `b '' (univ \ {i})` contains each `b j`.
refine spans.trans (span_le.mpr ?_)
rintro _ ⟨j, rfl, rfl⟩
-- The case that `j ≠ i` is easy because `b j ∈ b '' (univ \ {i})`.
by_cases j_eq : j = i
swap
· refine subset_span ⟨j, (Set.mem_diff _).mpr ⟨Set.mem_univ _, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
exact mt Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp j_eq
-- To show `b i ∈ span (b '' (univ \ {i}))`, we use that it's a weighted sum
-- of the other `b j`s.
rw [j_eq, SetLike.mem_coe, show b i = -((g i)⁻¹ • (s.erase i).sum fun j => g j • b j) from _]
· refine neg_mem (smul_mem _ _ (sum_mem fun k hk => ?_))
obtain ⟨k_ne_i, _⟩ := Finset.mem_erase.mp hk
refine smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨k, ?_, rfl⟩)
simp_all only [Set.mem_univ, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, and_self, not_false_eq_true]
-- To show `b i` is a weighted sum of the other `b j`s, we'll rewrite this sum
-- to have the form of the assumption `dependent`.
apply eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left
calc
(b i + (g i)⁻¹ • (s.erase i).sum fun j => g j • b j) =
(g i)⁻¹ • (g i • b i + (s.erase i).sum fun j => g j • b j) := by
rw [smul_add, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel gx_ne_zero, one_smul]
_ = (g i)⁻¹ • (0 : V) := congr_arg _ ?_
_ = 0 := smul_zero _
-- And then it's just a bit of manipulation with finite sums.
rwa [← Finset.insert_erase i_mem_s, Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _)] at dependent
#align linear_independent_of_top_le_span_of_card_eq_finrank linearIndependent_of_top_le_span_of_card_eq_finrank
theorem linearIndependent_iff_card_eq_finrank_span {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → V} :
LinearIndependent K b ↔ Fintype.card ι = (Set.range b).finrank K := by
constructor
· intro h
exact (finrank_span_eq_card h).symm
· intro hc
let f := Submodule.subtype (span K (Set.range b))
let b' : ι → span K (Set.range b) := fun i =>
⟨b i, mem_span.2 fun p hp => hp (Set.mem_range_self _)⟩
have hs : ⊤ ≤ span K (Set.range b') := by
intro x
have h : span K (f '' Set.range b') = map f (span K (Set.range b')) := span_image f
have hf : f '' Set.range b' = Set.range b := by
ext x
simp [f, Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range]
rw [hf] at h
have hx : (x : V) ∈ span K (Set.range b) := x.property
conv at hx =>
arg 2
rw [h]
simpa [f, mem_map] using hx
have hi : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥ := ker_subtype _
convert (linearIndependent_of_top_le_span_of_card_eq_finrank hs hc).map' _ hi
#align linear_independent_iff_card_eq_finrank_span linearIndependent_iff_card_eq_finrank_span
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean | 196 | 198 | theorem linearIndependent_iff_card_le_finrank_span {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {b : ι → V} :
LinearIndependent K b ↔ Fintype.card ι ≤ (Set.range b).finrank K := by |
rw [linearIndependent_iff_card_eq_finrank_span, (finrank_range_le_card _).le_iff_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 562 | 563 | theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by |
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Dedup
#align_import data.multiset.bind from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
universe v
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ δ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
def join : Multiset (Multiset α) → Multiset α :=
sum
#align multiset.join Multiset.join
theorem coe_join :
∀ L : List (List α), join (L.map ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α)) = L.join
| [] => rfl
| l :: L => by
exact congr_arg (fun s : Multiset α => ↑l + s) (coe_join L)
#align multiset.coe_join Multiset.coe_join
@[simp]
theorem join_zero : @join α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.join_zero Multiset.join_zero
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s S) : @join α (s ::ₘ S) = s + join S :=
sum_cons _ _
#align multiset.join_cons Multiset.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem join_add (S T) : @join α (S + T) = join S + join T :=
sum_add _ _
#align multiset.join_add Multiset.join_add
@[simp]
theorem singleton_join (a) : join ({a} : Multiset (Multiset α)) = a :=
sum_singleton _
#align multiset.singleton_join Multiset.singleton_join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {a S} : a ∈ @join α S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) <| by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_and_right, exists_or]
#align multiset.mem_join Multiset.mem_join
@[simp]
theorem card_join (S) : card (@join α S) = sum (map card S) :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) (by simp)
#align multiset.card_join Multiset.card_join
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (S : Multiset (Multiset α)) :
map f (join S) = join (map (map f) S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_join [CommMonoid α] {S : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
prod (join S) = prod (map prod S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem rel_join {r : α → β → Prop} {s t} (h : Rel (Rel r) s t) : Rel r s.join t.join := by
induction h with
| zero => simp
| cons hab hst ih => simpa using hab.add ih
#align multiset.rel_join Multiset.rel_join
section Bind
variable (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) (f g : α → Multiset β)
def bind (s : Multiset α) (f : α → Multiset β) : Multiset β :=
(s.map f).join
#align multiset.bind Multiset.bind
@[simp]
theorem coe_bind (l : List α) (f : α → List β) : (@bind α β l fun a => f a) = l.bind f := by
rw [List.bind, ← coe_join, List.map_map]
rfl
#align multiset.coe_bind Multiset.coe_bind
@[simp]
theorem zero_bind : bind 0 f = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.zero_bind Multiset.zero_bind
@[simp]
theorem cons_bind : (a ::ₘ s).bind f = f a + s.bind f := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.cons_bind Multiset.cons_bind
@[simp]
theorem singleton_bind : bind {a} f = f a := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.singleton_bind Multiset.singleton_bind
@[simp]
theorem add_bind : (s + t).bind f = s.bind f + t.bind f := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.add_bind Multiset.add_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_zero : s.bind (fun _ => 0 : α → Multiset β) = 0 := by simp [bind, join, nsmul_zero]
#align multiset.bind_zero Multiset.bind_zero
@[simp]
theorem bind_add : (s.bind fun a => f a + g a) = s.bind f + s.bind g := by simp [bind, join]
#align multiset.bind_add Multiset.bind_add
@[simp]
theorem bind_cons (f : α → β) (g : α → Multiset β) :
(s.bind fun a => f a ::ₘ g a) = map f s + s.bind g :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc])
#align multiset.bind_cons Multiset.bind_cons
@[simp]
theorem bind_singleton (f : α → β) : (s.bind fun x => ({f x} : Multiset β)) = map f s :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by rw [zero_bind, map_zero]) (by simp [singleton_add])
#align multiset.bind_singleton Multiset.bind_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b s} {f : α → Multiset β} : b ∈ bind s f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a := by
simp [bind]
#align multiset.mem_bind Multiset.mem_bind
@[simp]
theorem card_bind : card (s.bind f) = (s.map (card ∘ f)).sum := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.card_bind Multiset.card_bind
theorem bind_congr {f g : α → Multiset β} {m : Multiset α} :
(∀ a ∈ m, f a = g a) → bind m f = bind m g := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [bind]
#align multiset.bind_congr Multiset.bind_congr
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Bind.lean | 170 | 174 | theorem bind_hcongr {β' : Type v} {m : Multiset α} {f : α → Multiset β} {f' : α → Multiset β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀ a ∈ m, HEq (f a) (f' a)) : HEq (bind m f) (bind m f') := by |
subst h
simp only [heq_eq_eq] at hf
simp [bind_congr hf]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Grpd
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Homotopy.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebraic_topology.fundamental_groupoid.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d7987cda72abc473c7cdbbb075170e9ac620042"
open CategoryTheory
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable {x₀ x₁ : X}
noncomputable section
open unitInterval
namespace Path
namespace Homotopy
section
def reflTransSymmAux (x : I × I) : ℝ :=
if (x.2 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then x.1 * 2 * x.2 else x.1 * (2 - 2 * x.2)
#align path.homotopy.refl_trans_symm_aux Path.Homotopy.reflTransSymmAux
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_reflTransSymmAux : Continuous reflTransSymmAux := by
refine continuous_if_le ?_ ?_ (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) ?_
· continuity
· continuity
· continuity
· continuity
intro x hx
norm_num [hx, mul_assoc]
#align path.homotopy.continuous_refl_trans_symm_aux Path.Homotopy.continuous_reflTransSymmAux
theorem reflTransSymmAux_mem_I (x : I × I) : reflTransSymmAux x ∈ I := by
dsimp only [reflTransSymmAux]
split_ifs
· constructor
· apply mul_nonneg
· apply mul_nonneg
· unit_interval
· norm_num
· unit_interval
· rw [mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_one
· unit_interval
· apply mul_nonneg
· norm_num
· unit_interval
· linarith
· constructor
· apply mul_nonneg
· unit_interval
linarith [unitInterval.nonneg x.2, unitInterval.le_one x.2]
· apply mul_le_one
· unit_interval
· linarith [unitInterval.nonneg x.2, unitInterval.le_one x.2]
· linarith [unitInterval.nonneg x.2, unitInterval.le_one x.2]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align path.homotopy.refl_trans_symm_aux_mem_I Path.Homotopy.reflTransSymmAux_mem_I
def reflTransSymm (p : Path x₀ x₁) : Homotopy (Path.refl x₀) (p.trans p.symm) where
toFun x := p ⟨reflTransSymmAux x, reflTransSymmAux_mem_I x⟩
continuous_toFun := by continuity
map_zero_left := by simp [reflTransSymmAux]
map_one_left x := by
dsimp only [reflTransSymmAux, Path.coe_toContinuousMap, Path.trans]
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rw [Path.extend, Set.IccExtend_of_mem]
· norm_num
· rw [unitInterval.mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two]
exact ⟨unitInterval.nonneg x, h⟩
· rw [Path.symm, Path.extend, Set.IccExtend_of_mem]
· simp only [Set.Icc.coe_one, one_mul, coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply]
congr 1
ext
norm_num [sub_sub_eq_add_sub]
· rw [unitInterval.two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff]
exact ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, unitInterval.le_one x⟩
prop' t x hx := by
simp only [Set.mem_singleton_iff, Set.mem_insert_iff] at hx
simp only [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, coe_toContinuousMap, Path.refl_apply]
cases hx with
| inl hx
| inr hx =>
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
rw [hx]
norm_num [reflTransSymmAux]
#align path.homotopy.refl_trans_symm Path.Homotopy.reflTransSymm
def reflSymmTrans (p : Path x₀ x₁) : Homotopy (Path.refl x₁) (p.symm.trans p) :=
(reflTransSymm p.symm).cast rfl <| congr_arg _ (Path.symm_symm _)
#align path.homotopy.refl_symm_trans Path.Homotopy.reflSymmTrans
end
section Assoc
def transAssocReparamAux (t : I) : ℝ :=
if (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 4 then 2 * t else if (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then t + 1 / 4 else 1 / 2 * (t + 1)
#align path.homotopy.trans_assoc_reparam_aux Path.Homotopy.transAssocReparamAux
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_transAssocReparamAux : Continuous transAssocReparamAux := by
refine continuous_if_le ?_ ?_ (Continuous.continuousOn ?_)
(continuous_if_le ?_ ?_
(Continuous.continuousOn ?_) (Continuous.continuousOn ?_) ?_).continuousOn
?_ <;>
[continuity; continuity; continuity; continuity; continuity; continuity; continuity; skip;
skip] <;>
· intro x hx
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num [hx]
#align path.homotopy.continuous_trans_assoc_reparam_aux Path.Homotopy.continuous_transAssocReparamAux
theorem transAssocReparamAux_mem_I (t : I) : transAssocReparamAux t ∈ I := by
unfold transAssocReparamAux
split_ifs <;> constructor <;> linarith [unitInterval.le_one t, unitInterval.nonneg t]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align path.homotopy.trans_assoc_reparam_aux_mem_I Path.Homotopy.transAssocReparamAux_mem_I
theorem transAssocReparamAux_zero : transAssocReparamAux 0 = 0 := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num [transAssocReparamAux]
#align path.homotopy.trans_assoc_reparam_aux_zero Path.Homotopy.transAssocReparamAux_zero
theorem transAssocReparamAux_one : transAssocReparamAux 1 = 1 := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num [transAssocReparamAux]
#align path.homotopy.trans_assoc_reparam_aux_one Path.Homotopy.transAssocReparamAux_one
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/FundamentalGroupoid/Basic.lean | 214 | 253 | theorem trans_assoc_reparam {x₀ x₁ x₂ x₃ : X} (p : Path x₀ x₁) (q : Path x₁ x₂) (r : Path x₂ x₃) :
(p.trans q).trans r =
(p.trans (q.trans r)).reparam
(fun t => ⟨transAssocReparamAux t, transAssocReparamAux_mem_I t⟩) (by continuity)
(Subtype.ext transAssocReparamAux_zero) (Subtype.ext transAssocReparamAux_one) := by |
ext x
simp only [transAssocReparamAux, Path.trans_apply, mul_inv_cancel_left₀, not_le,
Function.comp_apply, Ne, not_false_iff, bit0_eq_zero, one_ne_zero, mul_ite, Subtype.coe_mk,
Path.coe_reparam]
-- TODO: why does split_ifs not reduce the ifs??????
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅
· rfl
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· have h : 2 * (2 * (x : ℝ)) - 1 = 2 * (2 * (↑x + 1 / 4) - 1) := by linarith
simp [h₂, h₁, h, dif_neg (show ¬False from id), dif_pos True.intro, if_false, if_true]
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· exfalso
linarith
· congr
ring
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Box.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
#align_import analysis.box_integral.box.subbox_induction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Finset Function Filter Metric Classical Topology Filter ENNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
namespace Box
variable {ι : Type*} {I J : Box ι}
def splitCenterBox (I : Box ι) (s : Set ι) : Box ι where
lower := s.piecewise (fun i ↦ (I.lower i + I.upper i) / 2) I.lower
upper := s.piecewise I.upper fun i ↦ (I.lower i + I.upper i) / 2
lower_lt_upper i := by
dsimp only [Set.piecewise]
split_ifs <;> simp only [left_lt_add_div_two, add_div_two_lt_right, I.lower_lt_upper]
#align box_integral.box.split_center_box BoxIntegral.Box.splitCenterBox
theorem mem_splitCenterBox {s : Set ι} {y : ι → ℝ} :
y ∈ I.splitCenterBox s ↔ y ∈ I ∧ ∀ i, (I.lower i + I.upper i) / 2 < y i ↔ i ∈ s := by
simp only [splitCenterBox, mem_def, ← forall_and]
refine forall_congr' fun i ↦ ?_
dsimp only [Set.piecewise]
split_ifs with hs <;> simp only [hs, iff_true_iff, iff_false_iff, not_lt]
exacts [⟨fun H ↦ ⟨⟨(left_lt_add_div_two.2 (I.lower_lt_upper i)).trans H.1, H.2⟩, H.1⟩,
fun H ↦ ⟨H.2, H.1.2⟩⟩,
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨⟨H.1, H.2.trans (add_div_two_lt_right.2 (I.lower_lt_upper i)).le⟩, H.2⟩,
fun H ↦ ⟨H.1.1, H.2⟩⟩]
#align box_integral.box.mem_split_center_box BoxIntegral.Box.mem_splitCenterBox
theorem splitCenterBox_le (I : Box ι) (s : Set ι) : I.splitCenterBox s ≤ I :=
fun _ hx ↦ (mem_splitCenterBox.1 hx).1
#align box_integral.box.split_center_box_le BoxIntegral.Box.splitCenterBox_le
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Box/SubboxInduction.lean | 69 | 75 | theorem disjoint_splitCenterBox (I : Box ι) {s t : Set ι} (h : s ≠ t) :
Disjoint (I.splitCenterBox s : Set (ι → ℝ)) (I.splitCenterBox t) := by |
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro y ⟨hs, ht⟩; apply h
ext i
rw [mem_coe, mem_splitCenterBox] at hs ht
rw [← hs.2, ← ht.2]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e96bdfbd1e8c98a09ff75f7ac6204d142debc840"
open Affine Pointwise
open Set
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {k : Type*} [Ring k]
variable {V P V₁ P₁ V₂ P₂ : Type*}
variable [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [AffineSpace V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module k V₁] [AddTorsor V₁ P₁]
variable [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AddTorsor V₂ P₂]
protected def pointwiseAddAction : AddAction V (AffineSubspace k P) where
vadd x S := S.map (AffineEquiv.constVAdd k P x)
zero_vadd p := ((congr_arg fun f => p.map f) <| AffineMap.ext <| zero_vadd _).trans p.map_id
add_vadd _ _ p :=
((congr_arg fun f => p.map f) <| AffineMap.ext <| add_vadd _ _).trans (p.map_map _ _).symm
#align affine_subspace.pointwise_add_action AffineSubspace.pointwiseAddAction
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] AffineSubspace.pointwiseAddAction
open Pointwise
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem pointwise_vadd_eq_map (v : V) (s : AffineSubspace k P) :
v +ᵥ s = s.map (AffineEquiv.constVAdd k P v) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_pointwise_vadd (v : V) (s : AffineSubspace k P) :
((v +ᵥ s : AffineSubspace k P) : Set P) = v +ᵥ (s : Set P) :=
rfl
#align affine_subspace.coe_pointwise_vadd AffineSubspace.coe_pointwise_vadd
theorem vadd_mem_pointwise_vadd_iff {v : V} {s : AffineSubspace k P} {p : P} :
v +ᵥ p ∈ v +ᵥ s ↔ p ∈ s :=
vadd_mem_vadd_set_iff
#align affine_subspace.vadd_mem_pointwise_vadd_iff AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_pointwise_vadd_iff
theorem pointwise_vadd_bot (v : V) : v +ᵥ (⊥ : AffineSubspace k P) = ⊥ := by
ext; simp [pointwise_vadd_eq_map, map_bot]
#align affine_subspace.pointwise_vadd_bot AffineSubspace.pointwise_vadd_bot
theorem pointwise_vadd_direction (v : V) (s : AffineSubspace k P) :
(v +ᵥ s).direction = s.direction := by
rw [pointwise_vadd_eq_map, map_direction]
exact Submodule.map_id _
#align affine_subspace.pointwise_vadd_direction AffineSubspace.pointwise_vadd_direction
theorem pointwise_vadd_span (v : V) (s : Set P) : v +ᵥ affineSpan k s = affineSpan k (v +ᵥ s) :=
map_span _ s
#align affine_subspace.pointwise_vadd_span AffineSubspace.pointwise_vadd_span
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Pointwise.lean | 74 | 79 | theorem map_pointwise_vadd (f : P₁ →ᵃ[k] P₂) (v : V₁) (s : AffineSubspace k P₁) :
(v +ᵥ s).map f = f.linear v +ᵥ s.map f := by |
erw [pointwise_vadd_eq_map, pointwise_vadd_eq_map, map_map, map_map]
congr 1
ext
exact f.map_vadd _ _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Idempotents
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NoncommRing
#align_import analysis.normed_space.M_structure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d11893b411025250c8e61ff2f12ccbd7ee35ab15"
variable (X : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup X]
variable {M : Type*} [Ring M] [Module M X]
-- Porting note: Mathlib3 uses names with uppercase 'L' for L-projections
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
structure IsLprojection (P : M) : Prop where
proj : IsIdempotentElem P
Lnorm : ∀ x : X, ‖x‖ = ‖P • x‖ + ‖(1 - P) • x‖
#align is_Lprojection IsLprojection
structure IsMprojection (P : M) : Prop where
proj : IsIdempotentElem P
Mnorm : ∀ x : X, ‖x‖ = max ‖P • x‖ ‖(1 - P) • x‖
#align is_Mprojection IsMprojection
variable {X}
namespace IsLprojection
-- Porting note: The literature always uses uppercase 'L' for L-projections
theorem Lcomplement {P : M} (h : IsLprojection X P) : IsLprojection X (1 - P) :=
⟨h.proj.one_sub, fun x => by
rw [add_comm, sub_sub_cancel]
exact h.Lnorm x⟩
#align is_Lprojection.Lcomplement IsLprojection.Lcomplement
theorem Lcomplement_iff (P : M) : IsLprojection X P ↔ IsLprojection X (1 - P) :=
⟨Lcomplement, fun h => sub_sub_cancel 1 P ▸ h.Lcomplement⟩
#align is_Lprojection.Lcomplement_iff IsLprojection.Lcomplement_iff
theorem commute [FaithfulSMul M X] {P Q : M} (h₁ : IsLprojection X P) (h₂ : IsLprojection X Q) :
Commute P Q := by
have PR_eq_RPR : ∀ R : M, IsLprojection X R → P * R = R * P * R := fun R h₃ => by
-- Porting note: Needed to fix function, which changes indent of following lines
refine @eq_of_smul_eq_smul _ X _ _ _ _ fun x => by
rw [← norm_sub_eq_zero_iff]
have e1 : ‖R • x‖ ≥ ‖R • x‖ + 2 • ‖(P * R) • x - (R * P * R) • x‖ :=
calc
‖R • x‖ = ‖R • P • R • x‖ + ‖(1 - R) • P • R • x‖ +
(‖(R * R) • x - R • P • R • x‖ + ‖(1 - R) • (1 - P) • R • x‖) := by
rw [h₁.Lnorm, h₃.Lnorm, h₃.Lnorm ((1 - P) • R • x), sub_smul 1 P, one_smul, smul_sub,
mul_smul]
_ = ‖R • P • R • x‖ + ‖(1 - R) • P • R • x‖ +
(‖R • x - R • P • R • x‖ + ‖((1 - R) * R) • x - (1 - R) • P • R • x‖) := by
rw [h₃.proj.eq, sub_smul 1 P, one_smul, smul_sub, mul_smul]
_ = ‖R • P • R • x‖ + ‖(1 - R) • P • R • x‖ +
(‖R • x - R • P • R • x‖ + ‖(1 - R) • P • R • x‖) := by
rw [sub_mul, h₃.proj.eq, one_mul, sub_self, zero_smul, zero_sub, norm_neg]
_ = ‖R • P • R • x‖ + ‖R • x - R • P • R • x‖ + 2 • ‖(1 - R) • P • R • x‖ := by abel
_ ≥ ‖R • x‖ + 2 • ‖(P * R) • x - (R * P * R) • x‖ := by
rw [GE.ge]
have :=
add_le_add_right (norm_le_insert' (R • x) (R • P • R • x)) (2 • ‖(1 - R) • P • R • x‖)
simpa only [mul_smul, sub_smul, one_smul] using this
rw [GE.ge] at e1
-- Porting note: Bump index in nth_rewrite
nth_rewrite 2 [← add_zero ‖R • x‖] at e1
rw [add_le_add_iff_left, two_smul, ← two_mul] at e1
rw [le_antisymm_iff]
refine ⟨?_, norm_nonneg _⟩
rwa [← mul_zero (2 : ℝ), mul_le_mul_left (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)] at e1
have QP_eq_QPQ : Q * P = Q * P * Q := by
have e1 : P * (1 - Q) = P * (1 - Q) - (Q * P - Q * P * Q) :=
calc
P * (1 - Q) = (1 - Q) * P * (1 - Q) := by rw [PR_eq_RPR (1 - Q) h₂.Lcomplement]
_ = P * (1 - Q) - (Q * P - Q * P * Q) := by noncomm_ring
rwa [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_right_eq_self, sub_eq_zero] at e1
show P * Q = Q * P
rw [QP_eq_QPQ, PR_eq_RPR Q h₂]
#align is_Lprojection.commute IsLprojection.commute
theorem mul [FaithfulSMul M X] {P Q : M} (h₁ : IsLprojection X P) (h₂ : IsLprojection X Q) :
IsLprojection X (P * Q) := by
refine ⟨IsIdempotentElem.mul_of_commute (h₁.commute h₂) h₁.proj h₂.proj, ?_⟩
intro x
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
‖x‖ = ‖(P * Q) • x + (x - (P * Q) • x)‖ := by rw [add_sub_cancel ((P * Q) • x) x]
_ ≤ ‖(P * Q) • x‖ + ‖x - (P * Q) • x‖ := by apply norm_add_le
_ = ‖(P * Q) • x‖ + ‖(1 - P * Q) • x‖ := by rw [sub_smul, one_smul]
· calc
‖x‖ = ‖P • Q • x‖ + (‖Q • x - P • Q • x‖ + ‖x - Q • x‖) := by
rw [h₂.Lnorm x, h₁.Lnorm (Q • x), sub_smul, one_smul, sub_smul, one_smul, add_assoc]
_ ≥ ‖P • Q • x‖ + ‖Q • x - P • Q • x + (x - Q • x)‖ :=
((add_le_add_iff_left ‖P • Q • x‖).mpr (norm_add_le (Q • x - P • Q • x) (x - Q • x)))
_ = ‖(P * Q) • x‖ + ‖(1 - P * Q) • x‖ := by
rw [sub_add_sub_cancel', sub_smul, one_smul, mul_smul]
#align is_Lprojection.mul IsLprojection.mul
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/MStructure.lean | 165 | 168 | theorem join [FaithfulSMul M X] {P Q : M} (h₁ : IsLprojection X P) (h₂ : IsLprojection X Q) :
IsLprojection X (P + Q - P * Q) := by |
convert (Lcomplement_iff _).mp (h₁.Lcomplement.mul h₂.Lcomplement) using 1
noncomm_ring
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Impartial
#align_import set_theory.game.nim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
-- Uses `noncomputable!` to avoid `rec_fn_macro only allowed in meta definitions` VM error
noncomputable def nim : Ordinal.{u} → PGame.{u}
| o₁ =>
let f o₂ :=
have _ : Ordinal.typein o₁.out.r o₂ < o₁ := Ordinal.typein_lt_self o₂
nim (Ordinal.typein o₁.out.r o₂)
⟨o₁.out.α, o₁.out.α, f, f⟩
termination_by o => o
#align pgame.nim SetTheory.PGame.nim
open Ordinal
theorem nim_def (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
nim o =
PGame.mk o.out.α o.out.α (fun o₂ => nim (Ordinal.typein (· < ·) o₂)) fun o₂ =>
nim (Ordinal.typein (· < ·) o₂) := by
rw [nim]; rfl
#align pgame.nim_def SetTheory.PGame.nim_def
theorem leftMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).LeftMoves = o.out.α := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_nim
theorem rightMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).RightMoves = o.out.α := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_nim
theorem moveLeft_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
HEq (nim o).moveLeft fun i : o.out.α => nim (typein (· < ·) i) := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.move_left_nim_heq SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim_hEq
theorem moveRight_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
HEq (nim o).moveRight fun i : o.out.α => nim (typein (· < ·) i) := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.move_right_nim_heq SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim_hEq
noncomputable def toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).LeftMoves :=
(enumIsoOut o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (leftMoves_nim o).symm)
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim
noncomputable def toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).RightMoves :=
(enumIsoOut o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (rightMoves_nim o).symm)
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves) :
↑(toLeftMovesNim.symm i) < o :=
(toLeftMovesNim.symm i).prop
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim_symm_lt SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).RightMoves) :
↑(toRightMovesNim.symm i) < o :=
(toRightMovesNim.symm i).prop
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim_symm_lt SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim_symm_lt
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_nim' {o : Ordinal.{u}} (i) :
(nim o).moveLeft i = nim (toLeftMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveLeft_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
#align pgame.move_left_nim' SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim'
theorem moveLeft_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNim i) = nim i := by simp
#align pgame.move_left_nim SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_nim' {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight i = nim (toRightMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveRight_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
#align pgame.move_right_nim' SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim'
theorem moveRight_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight (toRightMovesNim i) = nim i := by simp
#align pgame.move_right_nim SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim
@[elab_as_elim]
def leftMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).LeftMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toLeftMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
#align pgame.left_moves_nim_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.leftMovesNimRecOn
@[elab_as_elim]
def rightMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).RightMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).RightMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toRightMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toRightMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
#align pgame.right_moves_nim_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.rightMovesNimRecOn
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).LeftMoves := by
rw [nim_def]
exact Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
#align pgame.is_empty_nim_zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_nim_zero_leftMoves
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).RightMoves := by
rw [nim_def]
exact Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
#align pgame.is_empty_nim_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_nim_zero_rightMoves
def nimZeroRelabelling : nim 0 ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
#align pgame.nim_zero_relabelling SetTheory.PGame.nimZeroRelabelling
theorem nim_zero_equiv : nim 0 ≈ 0 :=
Equiv.isEmpty _
#align pgame.nim_zero_equiv SetTheory.PGame.nim_zero_equiv
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneLeftMoves : Unique (nim 1).LeftMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| leftMoves_nim 1).unique
#align pgame.unique_nim_one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueNimOneLeftMoves
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneRightMoves : Unique (nim 1).RightMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| rightMoves_nim 1).unique
#align pgame.unique_nim_one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueNimOneRightMoves
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_leftMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).LeftMoves) = @toLeftMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
#align pgame.default_nim_one_left_moves_eq SetTheory.PGame.default_nim_one_leftMoves_eq
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_rightMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).RightMoves) = @toRightMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
#align pgame.default_nim_one_right_moves_eq SetTheory.PGame.default_nim_one_rightMoves_eq
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toLeftMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim_one_symm SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim_one_symm
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toRightMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim_one_symm SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim_one_symm
theorem nim_one_moveLeft (x) : (nim 1).moveLeft x = nim 0 := by simp
#align pgame.nim_one_move_left SetTheory.PGame.nim_one_moveLeft
theorem nim_one_moveRight (x) : (nim 1).moveRight x = nim 0 := by simp
#align pgame.nim_one_move_right SetTheory.PGame.nim_one_moveRight
def nimOneRelabelling : nim 1 ≡r star := by
rw [nim_def]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun i => ?_, fun j => ?_⟩
any_goals dsimp; apply Equiv.equivOfUnique
all_goals simp; exact nimZeroRelabelling
#align pgame.nim_one_relabelling SetTheory.PGame.nimOneRelabelling
theorem nim_one_equiv : nim 1 ≈ star :=
nimOneRelabelling.equiv
#align pgame.nim_one_equiv SetTheory.PGame.nim_one_equiv
@[simp]
theorem nim_birthday (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).birthday = o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim_def, birthday_def]
dsimp
rw [max_eq_right le_rfl]
convert lsub_typein o with i
exact IH _ (typein_lt_self i)
#align pgame.nim_birthday SetTheory.PGame.nim_birthday
@[simp]
theorem neg_nim (o : Ordinal) : -nim o = nim o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim_def]; dsimp; congr <;> funext i <;> exact IH _ (Ordinal.typein_lt_self i)
#align pgame.neg_nim SetTheory.PGame.neg_nim
instance nim_impartial (o : Ordinal) : Impartial (nim o) := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [impartial_def, neg_nim]
refine ⟨equiv_rfl, fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩ <;> simpa using IH _ (typein_lt_self _)
#align pgame.nim_impartial SetTheory.PGame.nim_impartial
theorem nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : nim o ‖ 0 := by
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_lf, nim_def, lf_zero_le]
rw [← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] at ho
exact ⟨(Ordinal.principalSegOut ho).top, by simp⟩
#align pgame.nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero SetTheory.PGame.nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_equiv_zero_iff (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : (nim o₁ + nim o₂ ≈ 0) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
constructor
· refine not_imp_not.1 fun hne : _ ≠ _ => (Impartial.not_equiv_zero_iff (nim o₁ + nim o₂)).2 ?_
wlog h : o₁ < o₂
· exact (fuzzy_congr_left add_comm_equiv).1 (this _ _ hne.symm (hne.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h))
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_gf, zero_lf_le, nim_def o₂]
refine ⟨toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inr ?_), ?_⟩
· exact (Ordinal.principalSegOut h).top
· -- Porting note: squeezed simp
simpa only [Ordinal.typein_top, Ordinal.type_lt, PGame.add_moveLeft_inr, PGame.moveLeft_mk]
using (Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)).2
· rintro rfl
exact Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)
#align pgame.nim_add_equiv_zero_iff SetTheory.PGame.nim_add_equiv_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : nim o₁ + nim o₂ ‖ 0 ↔ o₁ ≠ o₂ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, Impartial.not_fuzzy_zero_iff, nim_add_equiv_zero_iff]
#align pgame.nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff SetTheory.PGame.nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem nim_equiv_iff_eq {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : (nim o₁ ≈ nim o₂) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
rw [Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero, nim_add_equiv_zero_iff]
#align pgame.nim_equiv_iff_eq SetTheory.PGame.nim_equiv_iff_eq
noncomputable def grundyValue : PGame.{u} → Ordinal.{u}
| G => Ordinal.mex.{u, u} fun i => grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)
termination_by G => G
#align pgame.grundy_value SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue
theorem grundyValue_eq_mex_left (G : PGame) :
grundyValue G = Ordinal.mex.{u, u} fun i => grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) := by rw [grundyValue]
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_mex_left SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_mex_left
theorem equiv_nim_grundyValue : ∀ (G : PGame.{u}) [G.Impartial], G ≈ nim (grundyValue G)
| G => by
rw [Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero, ← Impartial.forall_leftMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero]
intro i
apply leftMoves_add_cases i
· intro i₁
rw [add_moveLeft_inl]
apply
(fuzzy_congr_left (add_congr_left (Equiv.symm (equiv_nim_grundyValue (G.moveLeft i₁))))).1
rw [nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff]
intro heq
rw [eq_comm, grundyValue_eq_mex_left G] at heq
-- Porting note: added universe annotation, argument
have h := Ordinal.ne_mex.{u, u} (fun i ↦ grundyValue (moveLeft G i))
rw [heq] at h
exact (h i₁).irrefl
· intro i₂
rw [add_moveLeft_inr, ← Impartial.exists_left_move_equiv_iff_fuzzy_zero]
revert i₂
rw [nim_def]
intro i₂
have h' :
∃ i : G.LeftMoves,
grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) = Ordinal.typein (Quotient.out (grundyValue G)).r i₂ := by
revert i₂
rw [grundyValue_eq_mex_left]
intro i₂
have hnotin : _ ∉ _ := fun hin =>
(le_not_le_of_lt (Ordinal.typein_lt_self i₂)).2 (csInf_le' hin)
simpa using hnotin
cases' h' with i hi
use toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inl i)
rw [add_moveLeft_inl, moveLeft_mk]
apply Equiv.trans (add_congr_left (equiv_nim_grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)))
simpa only [hi] using Impartial.add_self (nim (grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)))
termination_by G => G
decreasing_by all_goals pgame_wf_tac
#align pgame.equiv_nim_grundy_value SetTheory.PGame.equiv_nim_grundyValue
theorem grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim {G : PGame} [G.Impartial] {o : Ordinal} :
grundyValue G = o ↔ (G ≈ nim o) :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact equiv_nim_grundyValue G,
by intro h; rw [← nim_equiv_iff_eq]; exact Equiv.trans (Equiv.symm (equiv_nim_grundyValue G)) h⟩
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_iff_equiv_nim SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim
@[simp]
theorem nim_grundyValue (o : Ordinal.{u}) : grundyValue (nim o) = o :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 PGame.equiv_rfl
#align pgame.nim_grundy_value SetTheory.PGame.nim_grundyValue
theorem grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv (G H : PGame) [G.Impartial] [H.Impartial] :
grundyValue G = grundyValue H ↔ (G ≈ H) :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.trans (equiv_congr_left.1 (equiv_nim_grundyValue H) _).symm
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_iff_equiv SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_zero : grundyValue 0 = 0 :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 (Equiv.symm nim_zero_equiv)
#align pgame.grundy_value_zero SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_zero
theorem grundyValue_iff_equiv_zero (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : grundyValue G = 0 ↔ (G ≈ 0) := by
rw [← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv, grundyValue_zero]
#align pgame.grundy_value_iff_equiv_zero SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_iff_equiv_zero
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_star : grundyValue star = 1 :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 (Equiv.symm nim_one_equiv)
#align pgame.grundy_value_star SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_star
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_neg (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : grundyValue (-G) = grundyValue G := by
rw [grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim, neg_equiv_iff, neg_nim, ← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim]
#align pgame.grundy_value_neg SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_neg
theorem grundyValue_eq_mex_right :
∀ (G : PGame) [G.Impartial],
grundyValue G = Ordinal.mex.{u, u} fun i => grundyValue (G.moveRight i)
| ⟨l, r, L, R⟩, _ => by
rw [← grundyValue_neg, grundyValue_eq_mex_left]
congr
ext i
haveI : (R i).Impartial := @Impartial.moveRight_impartial ⟨l, r, L, R⟩ _ i
apply grundyValue_neg
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_mex_right SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_mex_right
-- Todo: this actually generalizes to all ordinals, by defining `Ordinal.lxor` as the pairwise
-- `Nat.xor` of base `ω` Cantor normal forms.
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_nim_add_nim (n m : ℕ) :
grundyValue (nim.{u} n + nim.{u} m) = n ^^^ m := by
-- We do strong induction on both variables.
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n hn generalizing m
induction' m using Nat.strong_induction_on with m hm
rw [grundyValue_eq_mex_left]
refine (Ordinal.mex_le_of_ne.{u, u} fun i => ?_).antisymm
(Ordinal.le_mex_of_forall fun ou hu => ?_)
-- The Grundy value `n ^^^ m` can't be reached by left moves.
· apply leftMoves_add_cases i <;>
· -- A left move leaves us with a Grundy value of `k ^^^ m` for `k < n`, or
-- `n ^^^ k` for `k < m`.
refine fun a => leftMovesNimRecOn a fun ok hk => ?_
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Ordinal.lt_omega.1 (hk.trans (Ordinal.nat_lt_omega _))
simp only [add_moveLeft_inl, add_moveLeft_inr, moveLeft_nim', Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
-- The inequality follows from injectivity.
rw [natCast_lt] at hk
first
| rw [hn _ hk]
| rw [hm _ hk]
refine fun h => hk.ne ?_
rw [Ordinal.natCast_inj] at h
first
| rwa [Nat.xor_left_inj] at h
| rwa [Nat.xor_right_inj] at h
-- Every other smaller Grundy value can be reached by left moves.
· -- If `u < m ^^^ n`, then either `u ^^^ n < m` or `u ^^^ m < n`.
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := Ordinal.lt_omega.1 (hu.trans (Ordinal.nat_lt_omega _))
replace hu := Ordinal.natCast_lt.1 hu
cases' Nat.lt_xor_cases hu with h h
-- In the first case, reducing the `m` pile to `u ^^^ n` gives the desired Grundy value.
· refine ⟨toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inl <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨_, Ordinal.natCast_lt.2 h⟩), ?_⟩
simp [Nat.xor_cancel_right, hn _ h]
-- In the second case, reducing the `n` pile to `u ^^^ m` gives the desired Grundy value.
· refine ⟨toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inr <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨_, Ordinal.natCast_lt.2 h⟩), ?_⟩
have : n ^^^ (u ^^^ n) = u := by rw [Nat.xor_comm u, Nat.xor_cancel_left]
simpa [hm _ h] using this
#align pgame.grundy_value_nim_add_nim SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_nim_add_nim
theorem nim_add_nim_equiv {n m : ℕ} : nim n + nim m ≈ nim (n ^^^ m) := by
rw [← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim, grundyValue_nim_add_nim]
#align pgame.nim_add_nim_equiv SetTheory.PGame.nim_add_nim_equiv
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Nim.lean | 405 | 409 | theorem grundyValue_add (G H : PGame) [G.Impartial] [H.Impartial] {n m : ℕ} (hG : grundyValue G = n)
(hH : grundyValue H = m) : grundyValue (G + H) = n ^^^ m := by |
rw [← nim_grundyValue (n ^^^ m), grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv]
refine Equiv.trans ?_ nim_add_nim_equiv
convert add_congr (equiv_nim_grundyValue G) (equiv_nim_grundyValue H) <;> simp only [hG, hH]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import number_theory.divisors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
open scoped Classical
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
def divisors : Finset ℕ :=
Finset.filter (fun x : ℕ => x ∣ n) (Finset.Ico 1 (n + 1))
#align nat.divisors Nat.divisors
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ :=
Finset.filter (fun x : ℕ => x ∣ n) (Finset.Ico 1 n)
#align nat.proper_divisors Nat.properDivisors
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
Finset.filter (fun x => x.fst * x.snd = n) (Ico 1 (n + 1) ×ˢ Ico 1 (n + 1))
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : (Finset.range n.succ).filter (· ∣ n) = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
#align nat.filter_dvd_eq_divisors Nat.filter_dvd_eq_divisors
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
(Finset.range n).filter (· ∣ n) = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
#align nat.filter_dvd_eq_proper_divisors Nat.filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
#align nat.proper_divisors.not_self_mem Nat.properDivisors.not_self_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
#align nat.mem_proper_divisors Nat.mem_properDivisors
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
#align nat.insert_self_proper_divisors Nat.insert_self_properDivisors
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
#align nat.cons_self_proper_divisors Nat.cons_self_properDivisors
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true_iff, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
#align nat.mem_divisors Nat.mem_divisors
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
#align nat.one_mem_divisors Nat.one_mem_divisors
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
#align nat.mem_divisors_self Nat.mem_divisors_self
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, Finset.mem_Ico, Ne, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_product]
rw [and_comm]
apply and_congr_right
rintro rfl
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· rw [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.lt_add_one_iff]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp only [succ_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.1), succ_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.2),
true_and_iff]
exact
⟨Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.2),
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.1)⟩
#align nat.mem_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
cases' m with m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
#align nat.divisor_le Nat.divisor_le
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
#align nat.divisors_subset_of_dvd Nat.divisors_subset_of_dvd
theorem divisors_subset_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) (hdiff : m ≠ n) :
divisors m ⊆ properDivisors n := by
apply Finset.subset_iff.2
intro x hx
exact
Nat.mem_properDivisors.2
⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.1 hx).1.trans h,
lt_of_le_of_lt (divisor_le hx)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (divisor_le (Nat.mem_divisors.2 ⟨h, hzero⟩)) hdiff)⟩
#align nat.divisors_subset_proper_divisors Nat.divisors_subset_properDivisors
lemma divisors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {n m : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ∣ n) :
(n.divisors.filter (· ∣ m)) = m.divisors := by
ext k
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_divisors]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hkm⟩ ↦ ⟨hkm, ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hn hm⟩, fun ⟨hk, _⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hk.trans hm, hn⟩, hk⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem divisors_zero : divisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_zero Nat.divisors_zero
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_zero : properDivisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.proper_divisors_zero Nat.properDivisors_zero
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_divisors : (divisors n).Nonempty ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ hn ↦ by simp [hn] at hm, fun hn ↦ ⟨1, one_mem_divisors.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma divisors_eq_empty : divisors n = ∅ ↔ n = 0 :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans nonempty_divisors.not_left
theorem properDivisors_subset_divisors : properDivisors n ⊆ divisors n :=
filter_subset_filter _ <| Ico_subset_Ico_right n.le_succ
#align nat.proper_divisors_subset_divisors Nat.properDivisors_subset_divisors
@[simp]
theorem divisors_one : divisors 1 = {1} := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_one Nat.divisors_one
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_one : properDivisors 1 = ∅ := by rw [properDivisors, Ico_self, filter_empty]
#align nat.proper_divisors_one Nat.properDivisors_one
theorem pos_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.divisors) : 0 < m := by
cases m
· rw [mem_divisors, zero_dvd_iff (a := n)] at h
cases h.2 h.1
apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.pos_of_mem_divisors Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors
theorem pos_of_mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 0 < m :=
pos_of_mem_divisors (properDivisors_subset_divisors h)
#align nat.pos_of_mem_proper_divisors Nat.pos_of_mem_properDivisors
theorem one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt : 1 ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ 1 < n := by
rw [mem_properDivisors, and_iff_right (one_dvd _)]
#align nat.one_mem_proper_divisors_iff_one_lt Nat.one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt
@[simp]
lemma sup_divisors_id (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sup id = n := by
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ divisor_le) ?_
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· apply zero_le
· exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) <| mem_divisors_self n hn
lemma one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 1 < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (pos_of_mem_properDivisors h) (mem_properDivisors.1 h).2
lemma one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) :
1 < n / m := by
obtain ⟨h_dvd, h_lt⟩ := mem_properDivisors.mp h
rwa [Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt h_dvd, mul_one]
lemma mem_properDivisors_iff_exists {m n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
m ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ ∃ k > 1, n = m * k := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨n / m, one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors h, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_properDivisors.mp h).1).symm
· rintro ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hn
exact mem_properDivisors.mpr ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn.1) hk⟩
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_properDivisors : n.properDivisors.Nonempty ↔ 1 < n :=
⟨fun ⟨_m, hm⟩ ↦ one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors hm, fun hn ↦
⟨1, one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma properDivisors_eq_empty : n.properDivisors = ∅ ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_properDivisors, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_zero : divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal_zero Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal_zero
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_one : divisorsAntidiagonal 1 = {(1, 1)} := by
ext
simp [mul_eq_one, Prod.ext_iff]
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal_one Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal_one
-- @[simp]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.swap ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm, Prod.swap]
#align nat.swap_mem_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
-- Porting note: added below thm to replace the simp from the previous thm
@[simp]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal_aux {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.snd * x.fst = n ∧ ¬n = 0 ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm]
theorem fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.fst ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro _ h.1, h.2]
#align nat.fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal Nat.fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal
theorem snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.snd ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro_left _ h.1, h.2]
#align nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal Nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).map (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding = divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, Equiv.coe_prodComm,
Set.image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
ext
exact swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
#align nat.map_swap_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.fst = divisors n := by
ext
simp [Dvd.dvd, @eq_comm _ n (_ * _)]
#align nat.image_fst_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.snd = divisors n := by
rw [← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, map_eq_image, image_image]
exact image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
#align nat.image_snd_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal
theorem map_div_right_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (d, n / d), fun p₁ p₂ => congr_arg Prod.fst⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
ext ⟨d, nd⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, mem_divisors,
Prod.ext_iff, exists_prop, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, hn⟩, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt]
exact ⟨rfl, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨dvd_mul_right _ _, hn⟩, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt⟩
#align nat.map_div_right_divisors Nat.map_div_right_divisors
theorem map_div_left_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (n / d, d), fun p₁ p₂ => congr_arg Prod.snd⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
apply Finset.map_injective (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding
ext
rw [map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, ← map_div_right_divisors, Finset.map_map]
simp
#align nat.map_div_left_divisors Nat.map_div_left_divisors
theorem sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self :
∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = (∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i) + n := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· rw [← cons_self_properDivisors hn, Finset.sum_cons, add_comm]
#align nat.sum_divisors_eq_sum_proper_divisors_add_self Nat.sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self
def Perfect (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n ∧ 0 < n
#align nat.perfect Nat.Perfect
theorem perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors (h : 0 < n) : Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n :=
and_iff_left h
#align nat.perfect_iff_sum_proper_divisors Nat.perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors
theorem perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul (h : 0 < n) :
Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = 2 * n := by
rw [perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors h, sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self, two_mul]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h]
· apply add_right_cancel h
#align nat.perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul Nat.perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul
theorem mem_divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) {x : ℕ} :
x ∈ divisors (p ^ k) ↔ ∃ j ≤ k, x = p ^ j := by
rw [mem_divisors, Nat.dvd_prime_pow pp, and_iff_left (ne_of_gt (pow_pos pp.pos k))]
#align nat.mem_divisors_prime_pow Nat.mem_divisors_prime_pow
theorem Prime.divisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : divisors p = {1, p} := by
ext
rw [mem_divisors, dvd_prime pp, and_iff_left pp.ne_zero, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
#align nat.prime.divisors Nat.Prime.divisors
theorem Prime.properDivisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : properDivisors p = {1} := by
rw [← erase_insert properDivisors.not_self_mem, insert_self_properDivisors pp.ne_zero,
pp.divisors, pair_comm, erase_insert fun con => pp.ne_one (mem_singleton.1 con)]
#align nat.prime.proper_divisors Nat.Prime.properDivisors
theorem divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) :
divisors (p ^ k) = (Finset.range (k + 1)).map ⟨(p ^ ·), Nat.pow_right_injective pp.two_le⟩ := by
ext a
rw [mem_divisors_prime_pow pp]
simp [Nat.lt_succ, eq_comm]
#align nat.divisors_prime_pow Nat.divisors_prime_pow
theorem divisors_injective : Function.Injective divisors :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective sup_divisors_id
@[simp]
theorem divisors_inj {a b : ℕ} : a.divisors = b.divisors ↔ a = b :=
divisors_injective.eq_iff
theorem eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum {s : Finset ℕ} (hsub : s ⊆ n.properDivisors) :
((∑ x ∈ s, x) = ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x) → s = n.properDivisors := by
cases n
· rw [properDivisors_zero, subset_empty] at hsub
simp [hsub]
classical
rw [← sum_sdiff hsub]
intro h
apply Subset.antisymm hsub
rw [← sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset]
contrapose h
rw [← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h
apply ne_of_lt
rw [← zero_add (∑ x ∈ s, x), ← add_assoc, add_zero]
apply add_lt_add_right
have hlt :=
sum_lt_sum_of_nonempty h fun x hx => pos_of_mem_properDivisors (sdiff_subset hx)
simp only [sum_const_zero] at hlt
apply hlt
#align nat.eq_proper_divisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum Nat.eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum
theorem sum_properDivisors_dvd (h : (∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x) ∣ n) :
∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = 1 ∨ ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = n := by
cases' n with n
· simp
· cases' n with n
· simp at h
· rw [or_iff_not_imp_right]
intro ne_n
have hlt : ∑ x ∈ n.succ.succ.properDivisors, x < n.succ.succ :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos _) h) ne_n
symm
rw [← mem_singleton, eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum (singleton_subset_iff.2
(mem_properDivisors.2 ⟨h, hlt⟩)) (sum_singleton _ _), mem_properDivisors]
exact ⟨one_dvd _, Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.succ_pos _)⟩
#align nat.sum_proper_divisors_dvd Nat.sum_properDivisors_dvd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Prime.prod_properDivisors {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
∏ x ∈ p.properDivisors, f x = f 1 := by simp [h.properDivisors]
#align nat.prime.prod_proper_divisors Nat.Prime.prod_properDivisors
#align nat.prime.sum_proper_divisors Nat.Prime.sum_properDivisors
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Prime.prod_divisors {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {p : ℕ} {f : ℕ → α} (h : p.Prime) :
∏ x ∈ p.divisors, f x = f p * f 1 := by
rw [← cons_self_properDivisors h.ne_zero, prod_cons, h.prod_properDivisors]
#align nat.prime.prod_divisors Nat.Prime.prod_divisors
#align nat.prime.sum_divisors Nat.Prime.sum_divisors
theorem properDivisors_eq_singleton_one_iff_prime : n.properDivisors = {1} ↔ n.Prime := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro h
refine Nat.prime_def_lt''.mpr ⟨?_, fun m hdvd => ?_⟩
· match n with
| 0 => contradiction
| 1 => contradiction
| Nat.succ (Nat.succ n) => simp [succ_le_succ]
· rw [← mem_singleton, ← h, mem_properDivisors]
have := Nat.le_of_dvd ?_ hdvd
· simp [hdvd, this]
exact (le_iff_eq_or_lt.mp this).symm
· by_contra!
simp only [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp this, this] at h
contradiction
· exact fun h => Prime.properDivisors h
#align nat.proper_divisors_eq_singleton_one_iff_prime Nat.properDivisors_eq_singleton_one_iff_prime
theorem sum_properDivisors_eq_one_iff_prime : ∑ x ∈ n.properDivisors, x = 1 ↔ n.Prime := by
cases' n with n
· simp [Nat.not_prime_zero]
· cases n
· simp [Nat.not_prime_one]
· rw [← properDivisors_eq_singleton_one_iff_prime]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ sum_singleton _ _⟩
rw [@eq_comm (Finset ℕ) _ _]
apply
eq_properDivisors_of_subset_of_sum_eq_sum
(singleton_subset_iff.2
(one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 (succ_lt_succ (Nat.succ_pos _))))
((sum_singleton _ _).trans h.symm)
#align nat.sum_proper_divisors_eq_one_iff_prime Nat.sum_properDivisors_eq_one_iff_prime
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 479 | 491 | theorem mem_properDivisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) {x : ℕ} :
x ∈ properDivisors (p ^ k) ↔ ∃ (j : ℕ) (_ : j < k), x = p ^ j := by |
rw [mem_properDivisors, Nat.dvd_prime_pow pp, ← exists_and_right]
simp only [exists_prop, and_assoc]
apply exists_congr
intro a
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨_h_left, rfl, h_right⟩
rw [Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt] at h_right
exact ⟨h_right, rfl⟩
· rcases h with ⟨h_left, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt]
simp [h_left, le_of_lt]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.CircleIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.integral.circle_transform from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d11893b411025250c8e61ff2f12ccbd7ee35ab15"
open Set MeasureTheory Metric Filter Function
open scoped Interval Real
noncomputable section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] (R : ℝ) (z w : ℂ)
namespace Complex
def circleTransform (f : ℂ → E) (θ : ℝ) : E :=
(2 * ↑π * I)⁻¹ • deriv (circleMap z R) θ • (circleMap z R θ - w)⁻¹ • f (circleMap z R θ)
#align complex.circle_transform Complex.circleTransform
def circleTransformDeriv (f : ℂ → E) (θ : ℝ) : E :=
(2 * ↑π * I)⁻¹ • deriv (circleMap z R) θ • ((circleMap z R θ - w) ^ 2)⁻¹ • f (circleMap z R θ)
#align complex.circle_transform_deriv Complex.circleTransformDeriv
theorem circleTransformDeriv_periodic (f : ℂ → E) :
Periodic (circleTransformDeriv R z w f) (2 * π) := by
have := periodic_circleMap
simp_rw [Periodic] at *
intro x
simp_rw [circleTransformDeriv, this]
congr 2
simp [this]
#align complex.circle_transform_deriv_periodic Complex.circleTransformDeriv_periodic
theorem circleTransformDeriv_eq (f : ℂ → E) : circleTransformDeriv R z w f =
fun θ => (circleMap z R θ - w)⁻¹ • circleTransform R z w f θ := by
ext
simp_rw [circleTransformDeriv, circleTransform, ← mul_smul, ← mul_assoc]
ring_nf
rw [inv_pow]
congr
ring
#align complex.circle_transform_deriv_eq Complex.circleTransformDeriv_eq
theorem integral_circleTransform (f : ℂ → E) :
(∫ θ : ℝ in (0)..2 * π, circleTransform R z w f θ) =
(2 * ↑π * I)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(z, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z := by
simp_rw [circleTransform, circleIntegral, deriv_circleMap, circleMap]
simp
#align complex.integral_circle_transform Complex.integral_circleTransform
theorem continuous_circleTransform {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) {f : ℂ → E} {z w : ℂ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f <| sphere z R) (hw : w ∈ ball z R) :
Continuous (circleTransform R z w f) := by
apply_rules [Continuous.smul, continuous_const]
· simp_rw [deriv_circleMap]
apply_rules [Continuous.mul, continuous_circleMap 0 R, continuous_const]
· exact continuous_circleMap_inv hw
· apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous hf (continuous_circleMap z R)
exact fun _ => (circleMap_mem_sphere _ hR.le) _
#align complex.continuous_circle_transform Complex.continuous_circleTransform
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleTransform.lean | 86 | 90 | theorem continuous_circleTransformDeriv {R : ℝ} (hR : 0 < R) {f : ℂ → E} {z w : ℂ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (sphere z R)) (hw : w ∈ ball z R) :
Continuous (circleTransformDeriv R z w f) := by |
rw [circleTransformDeriv_eq]
exact (continuous_circleMap_inv hw).smul (continuous_circleTransform hR hf hw)
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.WeakDual
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.HasOuterApproxClosed
#align_import measure_theory.measure.finite_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory
open Set
open Filter
open BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace FiniteMeasure
section FiniteMeasure
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
def _root_.MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure (Ω : Type*) [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Type _ :=
{ μ : Measure Ω // IsFiniteMeasure μ }
#align measure_theory.finite_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure
-- Porting note: as with other subtype synonyms (e.g., `ℝ≥0`, we need a new function for the
-- coercion instead of relying on `Subtype.val`.
@[coe]
def toMeasure : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω := Subtype.val
instance instCoe : Coe (FiniteMeasure Ω) (MeasureTheory.Measure Ω) where
coe := toMeasure
instance isFiniteMeasure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure Ω) :=
μ.prop
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.isFiniteMeasure
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ν.val = (ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.val_eq_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.val_eq_toMeasure
theorem toMeasure_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_injective MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_injective
instance instFunLike : FunLike (FiniteMeasure Ω) (Set Ω) ℝ≥0 where
coe μ s := ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal
coe_injective' μ ν h := toMeasure_injective $ Measure.ext fun s _ ↦ by
simpa [ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff, measure_ne_top] using congr_fun h s
lemma coeFn_def (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ = fun s ↦ ((μ : Measure Ω) s).toNNReal := rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_eq_to_nnreal_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_def
lemma coeFn_mk (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ = fun s ↦ (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma mk_apply (μ : Measure Ω) (hμ) (s : Set Ω) :
DFunLike.coe (F := FiniteMeasure Ω) ⟨μ, hμ⟩ s = (μ s).toNNReal := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure (ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(ν s : ℝ≥0∞) = (ν : Measure Ω) s :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_lt_top (↑ν) s).ne
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.ennreal_coe_fn_eq_coe_fn_to_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure
theorem apply_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {s₁ s₂ : Set Ω} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := by
change ((μ : Measure Ω) s₁).toNNReal ≤ ((μ : Measure Ω) s₂).toNNReal
have key : (μ : Measure Ω) s₁ ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) s₂ := (μ : Measure Ω).mono h
apply (ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal (measure_ne_top _ s₁) (measure_ne_top _ s₂)).mpr key
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.apply_mono MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.apply_mono
def mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ℝ≥0 :=
μ univ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass
@[simp] theorem apply_le_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) : μ s ≤ μ.mass := by
simpa using apply_mono μ (subset_univ s)
@[simp]
theorem ennreal_mass {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} : (μ.mass : ℝ≥0∞) = (μ : Measure Ω) univ :=
ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure μ Set.univ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.ennreal_mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.ennreal_mass
instance instZero : Zero (FiniteMeasure Ω) where zero := ⟨0, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureZero⟩
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.instZero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : FiniteMeasure Ω) = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_mass : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).mass = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_mass
@[simp]
theorem mass_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun μ_mass => ?_, fun hμ => by simp only [hμ, zero_mass]⟩
apply toMeasure_injective
apply Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.mp
rwa [← ennreal_mass, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass_zero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff
theorem mass_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.mass ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := by
rw [not_iff_not]
exact FiniteMeasure.mass_zero_iff μ
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.mass_nonzero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.mass_nonzero_iff
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → (μ : Measure Ω) s = (ν : Measure Ω) s) : μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
ext1 s s_mble
exact h s s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.eq_of_forall_measure_apply_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.eq_of_forall_toMeasure_apply_eq
theorem eq_of_forall_apply_eq (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω)
(h : ∀ s : Set Ω, MeasurableSet s → μ s = ν s) : μ = ν := by
ext1 s s_mble
simpa [ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) (h s s_mble)
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.eq_of_forall_apply_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.eq_of_forall_apply_eq
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd : Add (FiniteMeasure Ω) where add μ ν := ⟨μ + ν, MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureAdd⟩
variable {R : Type*} [SMul R ℝ≥0] [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0∞]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul : SMul R (FiniteMeasure Ω) where
smul (c : R) μ := ⟨c • (μ : Measure Ω), MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureSMulOfNNRealTower⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_zero : ((↑) : FiniteMeasure Ω → Measure Ω) 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_zero
-- Porting note: with `simp` here the `coeFn` lemmas below fall prey to `simpNF`: the LHS simplifies
@[norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(μ + ν) = (↑μ + ↑ν : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toMeasure_smul (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : ↑(c • μ) = c • (μ : Measure Ω) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasure_smul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_add (μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω) : (⇑(μ + ν) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = (⇑μ + ⇑ν : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_inj, ne_eq, ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure,
ENNReal.coe_add]
norm_cast
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_add MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coeFn_smul [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) :
(⇑(c • μ) : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) = c • (⇑μ : Set Ω → ℝ≥0) := by
funext; simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ENNReal.coe_smul]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_smul MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.coeFn_smul
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
toMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid (↑) toMeasure_zero toMeasure_add fun _ _ => toMeasure_smul _ _
@[simps]
def toMeasureAddMonoidHom : FiniteMeasure Ω →+ Measure Ω where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := toMeasure_zero
map_add' := toMeasure_add
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_add_monoid_hom MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.toMeasureAddMonoidHom
instance {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω] : Module ℝ≥0 (FiniteMeasure Ω) :=
Function.Injective.module _ toMeasureAddMonoidHom toMeasure_injective toMeasure_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0] (c : R) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (s : Set Ω) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s := by
rw [coeFn_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.coe_fn_smul_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.smul_apply
def restrict (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : FiniteMeasure Ω where
val := (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A
property := MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasureRestrict (μ : Measure Ω) A
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict
theorem restrict_measure_eq (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) :
(μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) = (μ : Measure Ω).restrict A :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_measure_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_measure_eq
theorem restrict_apply_measure (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω}
(s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : (μ.restrict A : Measure Ω) s = (μ : Measure Ω) (s ∩ A) :=
Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_apply_measure MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_apply_measure
theorem restrict_apply (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) {s : Set Ω} (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ.restrict A) s = μ (s ∩ A) := by
apply congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal
exact Measure.restrict_apply s_mble
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_mass (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : (μ.restrict A).mass = μ A := by
simp only [mass, restrict_apply μ A MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_mass MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_mass
theorem restrict_eq_zero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A = 0 ↔ μ A = 0 := by
rw [← mass_zero_iff, restrict_mass]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_eq_zero_iff
theorem restrict_nonzero_iff (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (A : Set Ω) : μ.restrict A ≠ 0 ↔ μ A ≠ 0 := by
rw [← mass_nonzero_iff, restrict_mass]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.restrict_nonzero_iff MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.restrict_nonzero_iff
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω]
theorem ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] [BorelSpace Ω]
{μ ν : FiniteMeasure Ω} (h : ∀ (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0), ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ν) :
μ = ν := by
apply Subtype.ext
change (μ : Measure Ω) = (ν : Measure Ω)
exact ext_of_forall_lintegral_eq_of_IsFiniteMeasure h
def testAgainstNN (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0 :=
(∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω)).toNNReal
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_coe_eq {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω} {f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} :
(μ.testAgainstNN f : ℝ≥0∞) = ∫⁻ ω, f ω ∂(μ : Measure Ω) :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (f.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal _).ne
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_coe_eq MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_coe_eq
theorem testAgainstNN_const (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (c : ℝ≥0) :
μ.testAgainstNN (BoundedContinuousFunction.const Ω c) = c * μ.mass := by
simp [← ENNReal.coe_inj]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_const MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_const
theorem testAgainstNN_mono (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) {f g : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0} (f_le_g : (f : Ω → ℝ≥0) ≤ g) :
μ.testAgainstNN f ≤ μ.testAgainstNN g := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, testAgainstNN_coe_eq]
gcongr
apply f_le_g
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_mono MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_mono
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_zero (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [zero_mul] using μ.testAgainstNN_const 0
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_zero MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_zero
@[simp]
theorem testAgainstNN_one (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) : μ.testAgainstNN 1 = μ.mass := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, coe_one, Pi.one_apply, ENNReal.coe_one, lintegral_one]
rfl
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.test_against_nn_one MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.testAgainstNN_one
@[simp]
theorem zero_testAgainstNN_apply (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN f = 0 := by
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_zero, lintegral_zero_measure, ENNReal.zero_toNNReal]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.test_against_nn_apply MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_testAgainstNN_apply
theorem zero_testAgainstNN : (0 : FiniteMeasure Ω).testAgainstNN = 0 := by
funext;
simp only [zero_testAgainstNN_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.zero.test_against_nn MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.zero_testAgainstNN
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/FiniteMeasure.lean | 379 | 382 | theorem smul_testAgainstNN_apply (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : FiniteMeasure Ω) (f : Ω →ᵇ ℝ≥0) :
(c • μ).testAgainstNN f = c • μ.testAgainstNN f := by |
simp only [testAgainstNN, toMeasure_smul, smul_eq_mul, ← ENNReal.smul_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def,
lintegral_smul_measure]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import data.part from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"80c43012d26f63026d362c3aba28f3c3bafb07e6"
open Function
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
Dom : Prop
get : Dom → α
#align part Part
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
#align part.to_option Part.toOption
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_some Part.toOption_isSome
@[simp] lemma toOption_isNone (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isNone ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_none Part.toOption_isNone
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
#align part.ext' Part.ext'
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align part.eta Part.eta
protected def Mem (a : α) (o : Part α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
#align part.mem Part.Mem
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
#align part.mem_eq Part.mem_eq
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
#align part.dom_iff_mem Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.get_mem Part.get_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.mem_mk_iff Part.mem_mk_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
#align part.ext Part.ext
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
#align part.none Part.none
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
#align part.not_mem_none Part.not_mem_none
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
#align part.some Part.some
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
#align part.some_dom Part.some_dom
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
#align part.mem_unique Part.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align part.mem.left_unique Part.Mem.left_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
#align part.get_eq_of_mem Part.get_eq_of_mem
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
#align part.subsingleton Part.subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
#align part.get_some Part.get_some
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_some Part.mem_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
#align part.mem_some_iff Part.mem_some_iff
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align part.eq_some_iff Part.eq_some_iff
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff Part.eq_none_iff
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff' Part.eq_none_iff'
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
#align part.not_none_dom Part.not_none_dom
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
#align part.some_ne_none Part.some_ne_none
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
#align part.none_ne_some Part.none_ne_some
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
#align part.ne_none_iff Part.ne_none_iff
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
#align part.eq_none_or_eq_some Part.eq_none_or_eq_some
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
#align part.some_injective Part.some_injective
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
#align part.some_inj Part.some_inj
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
#align part.some_get Part.some_get
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_eq_some Part.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
#align part.get_eq_get_of_eq Part.get_eq_get_of_eq
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_mem Part.get_eq_iff_mem
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
#align part.eq_get_iff_mem Part.eq_get_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
#align part.none_to_option Part.none_toOption
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
#align part.some_to_option Part.some_toOption
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
#align part.none_decidable Part.noneDecidable
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
#align part.some_decidable Part.someDecidable
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
#align part.get_or_else Part.getOrElse
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.get_or_else_of_dom Part.getOrElse_of_dom
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
#align part.get_or_else_of_not_dom Part.getOrElse_of_not_dom
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
#align part.get_or_else_none Part.getOrElse_none
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
#align part.get_or_else_some Part.getOrElse_some
-- Porting note: removed `simp`
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
#align part.mem_to_option Part.mem_toOption
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem, like `mem_toOption` but with LHS in `simp` normal form
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.dom.to_option Part.Dom.toOption
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
#align part.to_option_eq_none_iff Part.toOption_eq_none_iff
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
#align part.elim_to_option Part.elim_toOption
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
#align part.of_option Part.ofOption
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
#align part.mem_of_option Part.mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
#align part.of_option_dom Part.ofOption_dom
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
#align part.of_option_eq_get Part.ofOption_eq_get
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
#align part.mem_coe Part.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
#align part.coe_none Part.coe_none
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.coe_some Part.coe_some
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
#align part.induction_on Part.induction_on
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
#align part.of_option_decidable Part.ofOptionDecidable
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
#align part.to_of_option Part.to_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
#align part.of_to_option Part.of_toOption
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
#align part.equiv_option Part.equivOption
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl x y := id
le_trans x y z f g i := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm x y f g := Part.ext fun z => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
#align part.le_total_of_le_of_le Part.le_total_of_le_of_le
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
#align part.assert Part.assert
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
#align part.bind Part.bind
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
#align part.map Part.map
#align part.map_dom Part.map_Dom
#align part.map_get Part.map_get
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_map Part.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
#align part.mem_map_iff Part.mem_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.map_none Part.map_none
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
#align part.map_some Part.map_some
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_assert Part.mem_assert
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
#align part.mem_assert_iff Part.mem_assert_iff
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· aesop
#align part.assert_pos Part.assert_pos
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
#align part.assert_neg Part.assert_neg
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_bind Part.mem_bind
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
#align part.mem_bind_iff Part.mem_bind_iff
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
#align part.dom.bind Part.Dom.bind
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
#align part.dom.of_bind Part.Dom.of_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.bind_none Part.bind_none
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
#align part.bind_some Part.bind_some
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
#align part.bind_of_mem Part.bind_of_mem
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
#align part.bind_some_eq_map Part.bind_some_eq_map
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
#align part.bind_to_option Part.bind_toOption
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
#align part.bind_assoc Part.bind_assoc
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
#align part.bind_map Part.bind_map
@[simp]
theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
#align part.map_bind Part.map_bind
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : map g (map f o) = map (g ∘ f) o := by
erw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_map, bind_some_eq_map]
#align part.map_map Part.map_map
instance : Monad Part where
pure := @some
map := @map
bind := @Part.bind
instance : LawfulMonad
Part where
bind_pure_comp := @bind_some_eq_map
id_map f := by cases f; rfl
pure_bind := @bind_some
bind_assoc := @bind_assoc
map_const := by simp [Functor.mapConst, Functor.map]
--Porting TODO : In Lean3 these were automatic by a tactic
seqLeft_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqLeft.seqLeft, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
seqRight_eq x y := ext'
(by simp [SeqRight.seqRight, Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, const, (· <$> ·), and_comm])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
pure_seq x y := ext'
(by simp [Seq.seq, Part.bind, assert, (· <$> ·), pure])
(fun _ _ => rfl)
bind_map x y := ext'
(by simp [(· >>= ·), Part.bind, assert, Seq.seq, get, (· <$> ·)] )
(fun _ _ => rfl)
theorem map_id' {f : α → α} (H : ∀ x : α, f x = x) (o) : map f o = o := by
rw [show f = id from funext H]; exact id_map o
#align part.map_id' Part.map_id'
@[simp]
theorem bind_some_right (x : Part α) : x.bind some = x := by
erw [bind_some_eq_map]; simp [map_id']
#align part.bind_some_right Part.bind_some_right
@[simp]
theorem pure_eq_some (a : α) : pure a = some a :=
rfl
#align part.pure_eq_some Part.pure_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem ret_eq_some (a : α) : (return a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.ret_eq_some Part.ret_eq_some
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : f <$> o = map f o :=
rfl
#align part.map_eq_map Part.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : f >>= g = f.bind g :=
rfl
#align part.bind_eq_bind Part.bind_eq_bind
theorem bind_le {α} (x : Part α) (f : α → Part β) (y : Part β) :
x >>= f ≤ y ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ x → f a ≤ y := by
constructor <;> intro h
· intro a h' b
have h := h b
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff, exists_imp] at h
apply h _ h'
· intro b h'
simp only [exists_prop, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨a, h₀, h₁⟩
apply h _ h₀ _ h₁
#align part.bind_le Part.bind_le
-- Porting note: No MonadFail in Lean4 yet
-- instance : MonadFail Part :=
-- { Part.monad with fail := fun _ _ => none }
def restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (H : p → o.Dom) : Part α :=
⟨p, fun h => o.get (H h)⟩
#align part.restrict Part.restrict
@[simp]
theorem mem_restrict (p : Prop) (o : Part α) (h : p → o.Dom) (a : α) :
a ∈ restrict p o h ↔ p ∧ a ∈ o := by
dsimp [restrict, mem_eq]; constructor
· rintro ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
exact ⟨h₀, ⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
rintro ⟨h₀, _, h₂⟩; exact ⟨h₀, h₂⟩
#align part.mem_restrict Part.mem_restrict
unsafe def unwrap (o : Part α) : α :=
o.get lcProof
#align part.unwrap Part.unwrap
theorem assert_defined {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ h : p, (f h).Dom → (assert p f).Dom :=
Exists.intro
#align part.assert_defined Part.assert_defined
theorem bind_defined {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} :
∀ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom → (f.bind g).Dom :=
assert_defined
#align part.bind_defined Part.bind_defined
@[simp]
theorem bind_dom {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : (f.bind g).Dom ↔ ∃ h : f.Dom, (g (f.get h)).Dom :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.bind_dom Part.bind_dom
section Instances
@[to_additive]
instance [One α] : One (Part α) where one := pure 1
@[to_additive]
instance [Mul α] : Mul (Part α) where mul a b := (· * ·) <$> a <*> b
@[to_additive]
instance [Inv α] : Inv (Part α) where inv := map Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
instance [Div α] : Div (Part α) where div a b := (· / ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Mod α] : Mod (Part α) where mod a b := (· % ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Append α] : Append (Part α) where append a b := (· ++ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Inter α] : Inter (Part α) where inter a b := (· ∩ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [Union α] : Union (Part α) where union a b := (· ∪ ·) <$> a <*> b
instance [SDiff α] : SDiff (Part α) where sdiff a b := (· \ ·) <$> a <*> b
section
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorems to unfold definitions
theorem mul_def [Mul α] (a b : Part α) : a * b = bind a fun y ↦ map (y * ·) b := rfl
theorem one_def [One α] : (1 : Part α) = some 1 := rfl
theorem inv_def [Inv α] (a : Part α) : a⁻¹ = Part.map (· ⁻¹) a := rfl
theorem div_def [Div α] (a b : Part α) : a / b = bind a fun y => map (y / ·) b := rfl
theorem mod_def [Mod α] (a b : Part α) : a % b = bind a fun y => map (y % ·) b := rfl
theorem append_def [Append α] (a b : Part α) : a ++ b = bind a fun y => map (y ++ ·) b := rfl
theorem inter_def [Inter α] (a b : Part α) : a ∩ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∩ ·) b := rfl
theorem union_def [Union α] (a b : Part α) : a ∪ b = bind a fun y => map (y ∪ ·) b := rfl
theorem sdiff_def [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) : a \ b = bind a fun y => map (y \ ·) b := rfl
end
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mem_one [One α] : (1 : α) ∈ (1 : Part α) :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.one_mem_one Part.one_mem_one
#align part.zero_mem_zero Part.zero_mem_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_mul [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma * mb ∈ a * b := ⟨⟨ha.1, hb.1⟩, by simp only [← ha.2, ← hb.2]; rfl⟩
#align part.mul_mem_mul Part.mul_mem_mul
#align part.add_mem_add Part.add_mem_add
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_mul_dom Part.left_dom_of_mul_dom
#align part.left_dom_of_add_dom Part.left_dom_of_add_dom
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_mul_dom [Mul α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a * b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_mul_dom Part.right_dom_of_mul_dom
#align part.right_dom_of_add_dom Part.right_dom_of_add_dom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_get_eq [Mul α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a * b)) :
(a * b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mul_dom hab) * b.get (right_dom_of_mul_dom hab) := rfl
#align part.mul_get_eq Part.mul_get_eq
#align part.add_get_eq Part.add_get_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem some_mul_some [Mul α] (a b : α) : some a * some b = some (a * b) := by simp [mul_def]
#align part.some_mul_some Part.some_mul_some
#align part.some_add_some Part.some_add_some
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mem_inv [Inv α] (a : Part α) (ma : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) : ma⁻¹ ∈ a⁻¹ := by
simp [inv_def]; aesop
#align part.inv_mem_inv Part.inv_mem_inv
#align part.neg_mem_neg Part.neg_mem_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_some [Inv α] (a : α) : (some a)⁻¹ = some a⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align part.inv_some Part.inv_some
#align part.neg_some Part.neg_some
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_div [Div α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma / mb ∈ a / b := by simp [div_def]; aesop
#align part.div_mem_div Part.div_mem_div
#align part.sub_mem_sub Part.sub_mem_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem left_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_div_dom Part.left_dom_of_div_dom
#align part.left_dom_of_sub_dom Part.left_dom_of_sub_dom
@[to_additive]
theorem right_dom_of_div_dom [Div α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a / b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_div_dom Part.right_dom_of_div_dom
#align part.right_dom_of_sub_dom Part.right_dom_of_sub_dom
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_get_eq [Div α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a / b)) :
(a / b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_div_dom hab) / b.get (right_dom_of_div_dom hab) := by
simp [div_def]; aesop
#align part.div_get_eq Part.div_get_eq
#align part.sub_get_eq Part.sub_get_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem some_div_some [Div α] (a b : α) : some a / some b = some (a / b) := by simp [div_def]
#align part.some_div_some Part.some_div_some
#align part.some_sub_some Part.some_sub_some
theorem mod_mem_mod [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma % mb ∈ a % b := by simp [mod_def]; aesop
#align part.mod_mem_mod Part.mod_mem_mod
theorem left_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_mod_dom Part.left_dom_of_mod_dom
theorem right_dom_of_mod_dom [Mod α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a % b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_mod_dom Part.right_dom_of_mod_dom
@[simp]
theorem mod_get_eq [Mod α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a % b)) :
(a % b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_mod_dom hab) % b.get (right_dom_of_mod_dom hab) := by
simp [mod_def]; aesop
#align part.mod_get_eq Part.mod_get_eq
theorem some_mod_some [Mod α] (a b : α) : some a % some b = some (a % b) := by simp [mod_def]
#align part.some_mod_some Part.some_mod_some
theorem append_mem_append [Append α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ++ mb ∈ a ++ b := by simp [append_def]; aesop
#align part.append_mem_append Part.append_mem_append
theorem left_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_append_dom Part.left_dom_of_append_dom
theorem right_dom_of_append_dom [Append α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_append_dom Part.right_dom_of_append_dom
@[simp]
theorem append_get_eq [Append α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ++ b)) : (a ++ b).get hab =
a.get (left_dom_of_append_dom hab) ++ b.get (right_dom_of_append_dom hab) := by
simp [append_def]; aesop
#align part.append_get_eq Part.append_get_eq
theorem some_append_some [Append α] (a b : α) : some a ++ some b = some (a ++ b) := by
simp [append_def]
#align part.some_append_some Part.some_append_some
theorem inter_mem_inter [Inter α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ∩ mb ∈ a ∩ b := by simp [inter_def]; aesop
#align part.inter_mem_inter Part.inter_mem_inter
theorem left_dom_of_inter_dom [Inter α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_inter_dom Part.left_dom_of_inter_dom
theorem right_dom_of_inter_dom [Inter α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_inter_dom Part.right_dom_of_inter_dom
@[simp]
theorem inter_get_eq [Inter α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ∩ b)) :
(a ∩ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_inter_dom hab) ∩ b.get (right_dom_of_inter_dom hab) := by
simp [inter_def]; aesop
#align part.inter_get_eq Part.inter_get_eq
theorem some_inter_some [Inter α] (a b : α) : some a ∩ some b = some (a ∩ b) := by
simp [inter_def]
#align part.some_inter_some Part.some_inter_some
theorem union_mem_union [Union α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma ∪ mb ∈ a ∪ b := by simp [union_def]; aesop
#align part.union_mem_union Part.union_mem_union
theorem left_dom_of_union_dom [Union α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_union_dom Part.left_dom_of_union_dom
theorem right_dom_of_union_dom [Union α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_union_dom Part.right_dom_of_union_dom
@[simp]
theorem union_get_eq [Union α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a ∪ b)) :
(a ∪ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_union_dom hab) ∪ b.get (right_dom_of_union_dom hab) := by
simp [union_def]; aesop
#align part.union_get_eq Part.union_get_eq
theorem some_union_some [Union α] (a b : α) : some a ∪ some b = some (a ∪ b) := by simp [union_def]
#align part.some_union_some Part.some_union_some
theorem sdiff_mem_sdiff [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) (ma mb : α) (ha : ma ∈ a) (hb : mb ∈ b) :
ma \ mb ∈ a \ b := by simp [sdiff_def]; aesop
#align part.sdiff_mem_sdiff Part.sdiff_mem_sdiff
theorem left_dom_of_sdiff_dom [SDiff α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a \ b)) : a.Dom := hab.1
#align part.left_dom_of_sdiff_dom Part.left_dom_of_sdiff_dom
theorem right_dom_of_sdiff_dom [SDiff α] {a b : Part α} (hab : Dom (a \ b)) : b.Dom := hab.2
#align part.right_dom_of_sdiff_dom Part.right_dom_of_sdiff_dom
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_get_eq [SDiff α] (a b : Part α) (hab : Dom (a \ b)) :
(a \ b).get hab = a.get (left_dom_of_sdiff_dom hab) \ b.get (right_dom_of_sdiff_dom hab) := by
simp [sdiff_def]; aesop
#align part.sdiff_get_eq Part.sdiff_get_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 878 | 878 | theorem some_sdiff_some [SDiff α] (a b : α) : some a \ some b = some (a \ b) := by | simp [sdiff_def]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
#align_import ring_theory.localization.integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
open Polynomial
namespace IsLocalization
section IntegerNormalization
open Polynomial
variable [IsLocalization M S]
open scoped Classical
noncomputable def coeffIntegerNormalization (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) : R :=
if hi : i ∈ p.support then
Classical.choose
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
else 0
#align is_localization.coeff_integer_normalization IsLocalization.coeffIntegerNormalization
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) (h : coeff p i = 0) :
coeffIntegerNormalization M p i = 0 := by
simp only [coeffIntegerNormalization, h, mem_support_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
dif_neg, not_false_iff]
#align is_localization.coeff_integer_normalization_of_not_mem_support IsLocalization.coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ)
(h : coeffIntegerNormalization M p i ≠ 0) : i ∈ p.support := by
contrapose h
rw [Ne, Classical.not_not, coeffIntegerNormalization, dif_neg h]
#align is_localization.coeff_integer_normalization_mem_support IsLocalization.coeffIntegerNormalization_mem_support
noncomputable def integerNormalization (p : S[X]) : R[X] :=
∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (coeffIntegerNormalization M p i)
#align is_localization.integer_normalization IsLocalization.integerNormalization
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Integral.lean | 74 | 77 | theorem integerNormalization_coeff (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) :
(integerNormalization M p).coeff i = coeffIntegerNormalization M p i := by |
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [integerNormalization, coeff_monomial,
coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Function
import Mathlib.Init.Order.Defs
#align_import data.bool.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4658a649d216f57e99621708b09dcb3dcccbd23"
namespace Bool
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias decide_True := decide_true_eq_true
#align bool.to_bool_true decide_true_eq_true
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias decide_False := decide_false_eq_false
#align bool.to_bool_false decide_false_eq_false
#align bool.to_bool_coe Bool.decide_coe
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias coe_decide := decide_eq_true_iff
#align bool.coe_to_bool decide_eq_true_iff
@[deprecated decide_eq_true_iff (since := "2024-06-07")]
alias of_decide_iff := decide_eq_true_iff
#align bool.of_to_bool_iff decide_eq_true_iff
#align bool.tt_eq_to_bool_iff true_eq_decide_iff
#align bool.ff_eq_to_bool_iff false_eq_decide_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias decide_not := decide_not
#align bool.to_bool_not decide_not
#align bool.to_bool_and Bool.decide_and
#align bool.to_bool_or Bool.decide_or
#align bool.to_bool_eq decide_eq_decide
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias not_false' := false_ne_true
#align bool.not_ff Bool.false_ne_true
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias eq_iff_eq_true_iff := eq_iff_iff
#align bool.default_bool Bool.default_bool
theorem dichotomy (b : Bool) : b = false ∨ b = true := by cases b <;> simp
#align bool.dichotomy Bool.dichotomy
theorem forall_bool' {p : Bool → Prop} (b : Bool) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p b ∧ p !b :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h _, h _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ x ↦ by cases b <;> cases x <;> assumption⟩
@[simp]
theorem forall_bool {p : Bool → Prop} : (∀ b, p b) ↔ p false ∧ p true :=
forall_bool' false
#align bool.forall_bool Bool.forall_bool
theorem exists_bool' {p : Bool → Prop} (b : Bool) : (∃ x, p x) ↔ p b ∨ p !b :=
⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by cases x <;> cases b <;> first | exact .inl ‹_› | exact .inr ‹_›,
fun h ↦ by cases h <;> exact ⟨_, ‹_›⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem exists_bool {p : Bool → Prop} : (∃ b, p b) ↔ p false ∨ p true :=
exists_bool' false
#align bool.exists_bool Bool.exists_bool
#align bool.decidable_forall_bool Bool.instDecidableForallOfDecidablePred
#align bool.decidable_exists_bool Bool.instDecidableExistsOfDecidablePred
#align bool.cond_eq_ite Bool.cond_eq_ite
#align bool.cond_to_bool Bool.cond_decide
#align bool.cond_bnot Bool.cond_not
theorem not_ne_id : not ≠ id := fun h ↦ false_ne_true <| congrFun h true
#align bool.bnot_ne_id Bool.not_ne_id
#align bool.coe_bool_iff Bool.coe_iff_coe
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias eq_true_of_ne_false := eq_true_of_ne_false
#align bool.eq_tt_of_ne_ff eq_true_of_ne_false
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias eq_false_of_ne_true := eq_false_of_ne_true
#align bool.eq_ff_of_ne_tt eq_true_of_ne_false
#align bool.bor_comm Bool.or_comm
#align bool.bor_assoc Bool.or_assoc
#align bool.bor_left_comm Bool.or_left_comm
theorem or_inl {a b : Bool} (H : a) : a || b := by simp [H]
#align bool.bor_inl Bool.or_inl
theorem or_inr {a b : Bool} (H : b) : a || b := by cases a <;> simp [H]
#align bool.bor_inr Bool.or_inr
#align bool.band_comm Bool.and_comm
#align bool.band_assoc Bool.and_assoc
#align bool.band_left_comm Bool.and_left_comm
theorem and_elim_left : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a && b → a := by decide
#align bool.band_elim_left Bool.and_elim_left
theorem and_intro : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a → b → a && b := by decide
#align bool.band_intro Bool.and_intro
theorem and_elim_right : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a && b → b := by decide
#align bool.band_elim_right Bool.and_elim_right
#align bool.band_bor_distrib_left Bool.and_or_distrib_left
#align bool.band_bor_distrib_right Bool.and_or_distrib_right
#align bool.bor_band_distrib_left Bool.or_and_distrib_left
#align bool.bor_band_distrib_right Bool.or_and_distrib_right
#align bool.bnot_ff Bool.not_false
#align bool.bnot_tt Bool.not_true
lemma eq_not_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a = !b ↔ a ≠ b := by decide
#align bool.eq_bnot_iff Bool.eq_not_iff
lemma not_eq_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, !a = b ↔ a ≠ b := by decide
#align bool.bnot_eq_iff Bool.not_eq_iff
#align bool.not_eq_bnot Bool.not_eq_not
#align bool.bnot_not_eq Bool.not_not_eq
theorem ne_not {a b : Bool} : a ≠ !b ↔ a = b :=
not_eq_not
#align bool.ne_bnot Bool.ne_not
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-07")] alias not_ne := not_not_eq
#align bool.bnot_ne Bool.not_not_eq
lemma not_ne_self : ∀ b : Bool, (!b) ≠ b := by decide
#align bool.bnot_ne_self Bool.not_ne_self
lemma self_ne_not : ∀ b : Bool, b ≠ !b := by decide
#align bool.self_ne_bnot Bool.self_ne_not
lemma eq_or_eq_not : ∀ a b, a = b ∨ a = !b := by decide
#align bool.eq_or_eq_bnot Bool.eq_or_eq_not
-- Porting note: naming issue again: these two `not` are different.
theorem not_iff_not : ∀ {b : Bool}, !b ↔ ¬b := by simp
#align bool.bnot_iff_not Bool.not_iff_not
theorem eq_true_of_not_eq_false' {a : Bool} : !a = false → a = true := by
cases a <;> decide
#align bool.eq_tt_of_bnot_eq_ff Bool.eq_true_of_not_eq_false'
theorem eq_false_of_not_eq_true' {a : Bool} : !a = true → a = false := by
cases a <;> decide
#align bool.eq_ff_of_bnot_eq_tt Bool.eq_false_of_not_eq_true'
#align bool.band_bnot_self Bool.and_not_self
#align bool.bnot_band_self Bool.not_and_self
#align bool.bor_bnot_self Bool.or_not_self
#align bool.bnot_bor_self Bool.not_or_self
theorem bne_eq_xor : bne = xor := by funext a b; revert a b; decide
#align bool.bxor_comm Bool.xor_comm
attribute [simp] xor_assoc
#align bool.bxor_assoc Bool.xor_assoc
#align bool.bxor_left_comm Bool.xor_left_comm
#align bool.bxor_bnot_left Bool.not_xor
#align bool.bxor_bnot_right Bool.xor_not
#align bool.bxor_bnot_bnot Bool.not_xor_not
#align bool.bxor_ff_left Bool.false_xor
#align bool.bxor_ff_right Bool.xor_false
#align bool.band_bxor_distrib_left Bool.and_xor_distrib_left
#align bool.band_bxor_distrib_right Bool.and_xor_distrib_right
theorem xor_iff_ne : ∀ {x y : Bool}, xor x y = true ↔ x ≠ y := by decide
#align bool.bxor_iff_ne Bool.xor_iff_ne
#align bool.bnot_band Bool.not_and
#align bool.bnot_bor Bool.not_or
#align bool.bnot_inj Bool.not_inj
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Bool where
le_refl := by decide
le_trans := by decide
le_antisymm := by decide
le_total := by decide
decidableLE := inferInstance
decidableEq := inferInstance
decidableLT := inferInstance
lt_iff_le_not_le := by decide
max_def := by decide
min_def := by decide
#align bool.linear_order Bool.linearOrder
#align bool.ff_le Bool.false_le
#align bool.le_tt Bool.le_true
theorem lt_iff : ∀ {x y : Bool}, x < y ↔ x = false ∧ y = true := by decide
#align bool.lt_iff Bool.lt_iff
@[simp]
theorem false_lt_true : false < true :=
lt_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
#align bool.ff_lt_tt Bool.false_lt_true
theorem le_iff_imp : ∀ {x y : Bool}, x ≤ y ↔ x → y := by decide
#align bool.le_iff_imp Bool.le_iff_imp
theorem and_le_left : ∀ x y : Bool, (x && y) ≤ x := by decide
#align bool.band_le_left Bool.and_le_left
theorem and_le_right : ∀ x y : Bool, (x && y) ≤ y := by decide
#align bool.band_le_right Bool.and_le_right
| Mathlib/Data/Bool/Basic.lean | 227 | 227 | theorem le_and : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, x ≤ y → x ≤ z → x ≤ (y && z) := by | decide
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentialImage
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Slice
#align_import category_theory.equivalence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9aba7801eeecebb61f58a5763c2b6dd1b47dc6ef"
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor NatIso Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
@[ext]
structure Equivalence (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] where mk' ::
functor : C ⥤ D
inverse : D ⥤ C
unitIso : 𝟭 C ≅ functor ⋙ inverse
counitIso : inverse ⋙ functor ≅ 𝟭 D
functor_unitIso_comp :
∀ X : C, functor.map (unitIso.hom.app X) ≫ counitIso.hom.app (functor.obj X) =
𝟙 (functor.obj X) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_iso_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unitIso_comp
infixr:10 " ≌ " => Equivalence
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Equivalence
abbrev unit (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 C ⟶ e.functor ⋙ e.inverse :=
e.unitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit
abbrev counit (e : C ≌ D) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⟶ 𝟭 D :=
e.counitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit
abbrev unitInv (e : C ≌ D) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
e.unitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv
abbrev counitInv (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 D ⟶ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor :=
e.counitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unit = unit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counit = counit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unitInv = unit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counitInv = counit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counitInv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem functor_unit_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) ≫ e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) :=
e.functor_unitIso_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unit_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counitInv_functor_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) ≫ e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X) ≪≫ e.counitIso.app (e.functor.obj X))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.functor_unit_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_functor_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_functor_comp
theorem counitInv_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.counitIso.app _), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_app_functor
theorem counit_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X)), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit_app_functor
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem unit_inverse_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≫ e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
rw [← id_comp (e.inverse.map _), ← map_id e.inverse, ← counitInv_functor_comp, map_comp]
dsimp
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.unitIso.app _) (e.inverse.map (e.functor.map _)), app_hom, app_inv]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 1 2 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 4 =>
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app _)) (e.unitInv.app _)]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counit.naturality]
erw [(e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counitIso.inv.naturality, map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 5 => erw [← map_comp (e.functor ⋙ e.inverse), (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [← e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, ← e.counitIso.inv.naturality, (e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id,
map_id]
erw [id_comp, (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id]; rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inverse_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit_inverse_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inverse_counitInv_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) ≫ e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.unitIso.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≪≫ e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.unit_inverse_comp Y
#align category_theory.equivalence.inverse_counit_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.inverse_counitInv_comp
theorem unit_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counitInv.app Y) := by
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app Y)), unit_inverse_comp]
dsimp
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_app_inverse CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit_app_inverse
theorem unitInv_app_inverse (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unitInv.app (e.inverse.obj Y) = e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.unitIso.app _), unit_inverse_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv_app_inverse CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv_app_inverse
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem fun_inv_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : D) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.functor.map (e.inverse.map f) = e.counit.app X ≫ f ≫ e.counitInv.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_2 e.counitIso f).symm
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_map CategoryTheory.Equivalence.fun_inv_map
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem inv_fun_map (e : C ≌ D) (X Y : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
e.inverse.map (e.functor.map f) = e.unitInv.app X ≫ f ≫ e.unit.app Y :=
(NatIso.naturality_1 e.unitIso f).symm
#align category_theory.equivalence.inv_fun_map CategoryTheory.Equivalence.inv_fun_map
section
-- In this section we convert an arbitrary equivalence to a half-adjoint equivalence.
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D)
def adjointifyη : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := by
calc
𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G := η
_ ≅ F ⋙ 𝟭 D ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (leftUnitor G).symm
_ ≅ F ⋙ (G ⋙ F) ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (isoWhiskerRight ε.symm G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerLeft F (associator G F G)
_ ≅ (F ⋙ G) ⋙ F ⋙ G := (associator F G (F ⋙ G)).symm
_ ≅ 𝟭 C ⋙ F ⋙ G := isoWhiskerRight η.symm (F ⋙ G)
_ ≅ F ⋙ G := leftUnitor (F ⋙ G)
#align category_theory.equivalence.adjointify_η CategoryTheory.Equivalence.adjointifyη
@[reassoc]
theorem adjointify_η_ε (X : C) :
F.map ((adjointifyη η ε).hom.app X) ≫ ε.hom.app (F.obj X) = 𝟙 (F.obj X) := by
dsimp [adjointifyη,Trans.trans]
simp only [comp_id, assoc, map_comp]
have := ε.hom.naturality (F.map (η.inv.app X)); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [← assoc _ _ (F.map _)]
have := ε.hom.naturality (ε.inv.app <| F.obj X); dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
have := (ε.app <| F.obj X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]; clear this
rw [id_comp]; have := (F.mapIso <| η.app X).hom_inv_id; dsimp at this; rw [this]
#align category_theory.equivalence.adjointify_η_ε CategoryTheory.Equivalence.adjointify_η_ε
end
protected def mk (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ C) (η : 𝟭 C ≅ F ⋙ G) (ε : G ⋙ F ≅ 𝟭 D) : C ≌ D :=
⟨F, G, adjointifyη η ε, ε, adjointify_η_ε η ε⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.mk CategoryTheory.Equivalence.mk
@[refl, simps]
def refl : C ≌ C :=
⟨𝟭 C, 𝟭 C, Iso.refl _, Iso.refl _, fun _ => Category.id_comp _⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.refl CategoryTheory.Equivalence.refl
instance : Inhabited (C ≌ C) :=
⟨refl⟩
@[symm, simps]
def symm (e : C ≌ D) : D ≌ C :=
⟨e.inverse, e.functor, e.counitIso.symm, e.unitIso.symm, e.inverse_counitInv_comp⟩
#align category_theory.equivalence.symm CategoryTheory.Equivalence.symm
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E]
@[trans, simps]
def trans (e : C ≌ D) (f : D ≌ E) : C ≌ E where
functor := e.functor ⋙ f.functor
inverse := f.inverse ⋙ e.inverse
unitIso := by
refine Iso.trans e.unitIso ?_
exact isoWhiskerLeft e.functor (isoWhiskerRight f.unitIso e.inverse)
counitIso := by
refine Iso.trans ?_ f.counitIso
exact isoWhiskerLeft f.inverse (isoWhiskerRight e.counitIso f.functor)
-- We wouldn't have needed to give this proof if we'd used `Equivalence.mk`,
-- but we choose to avoid using that here, for the sake of good structure projection `simp`
-- lemmas.
functor_unitIso_comp X := by
dsimp
rw [← f.functor.map_comp_assoc, e.functor.map_comp, ← counitInv_app_functor, fun_inv_map,
Iso.inv_hom_id_app_assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id_app, counit_app_functor, ← Functor.map_comp]
erw [comp_id, Iso.hom_inv_id_app, Functor.map_id]
#align category_theory.equivalence.trans CategoryTheory.Equivalence.trans
def funInvIdAssoc (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⋙ F ≅ F :=
(Functor.associator _ _ _).symm ≪≫ isoWhiskerRight e.unitIso.symm F ≪≫ F.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc
@[simp]
theorem funInvIdAssoc_hom_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).hom.app X = F.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence.fun_inv_id_assoc_hom_app CategoryTheory.Equivalence.funInvIdAssoc_hom_app
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Equivalence.lean | 331 | 334 | theorem funInvIdAssoc_inv_app (e : C ≌ D) (F : C ⥤ E) (X : C) :
(funInvIdAssoc e F).inv.app X = F.map (e.unit.app X) := by |
dsimp [funInvIdAssoc]
aesop_cat
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EuclideanDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
noncomputable section
universe u
variable {K : Type u}
namespace RatFunc
section IntDegree
open Polynomial
variable [Field K]
def intDegree (x : RatFunc K) : ℤ :=
natDegree x.num - natDegree x.denom
#align ratfunc.int_degree RatFunc.intDegree
@[simp]
theorem intDegree_zero : intDegree (0 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by
rw [intDegree, num_zero, natDegree_zero, denom_zero, natDegree_one, sub_self]
#align ratfunc.int_degree_zero RatFunc.intDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem intDegree_one : intDegree (1 : RatFunc K) = 0 := by
rw [intDegree, num_one, denom_one, sub_self]
#align ratfunc.int_degree_one RatFunc.intDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem intDegree_C (k : K) : intDegree (C k) = 0 := by
rw [intDegree, num_C, natDegree_C, denom_C, natDegree_one, sub_self]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.int_degree_C RatFunc.intDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem intDegree_X : intDegree (X : RatFunc K) = 1 := by
rw [intDegree, num_X, Polynomial.natDegree_X, denom_X, Polynomial.natDegree_one,
Int.ofNat_one, Int.ofNat_zero, sub_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in #align ratfunc.int_degree_X RatFunc.intDegree_X
@[simp]
theorem intDegree_polynomial {p : K[X]} :
intDegree (algebraMap K[X] (RatFunc K) p) = natDegree p := by
rw [intDegree, RatFunc.num_algebraMap, RatFunc.denom_algebraMap, Polynomial.natDegree_one,
Int.ofNat_zero, sub_zero]
#align ratfunc.int_degree_polynomial RatFunc.intDegree_polynomial
theorem intDegree_mul {x y : RatFunc K} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
intDegree (x * y) = intDegree x + intDegree y := by
simp only [intDegree, add_sub, sub_add, sub_sub_eq_add_sub, sub_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add]
norm_cast
rw [← Polynomial.natDegree_mul x.denom_ne_zero y.denom_ne_zero, ←
Polynomial.natDegree_mul (RatFunc.num_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero hx hy))
(mul_ne_zero x.denom_ne_zero y.denom_ne_zero),
← Polynomial.natDegree_mul (RatFunc.num_ne_zero hx) (RatFunc.num_ne_zero hy), ←
Polynomial.natDegree_mul (mul_ne_zero (RatFunc.num_ne_zero hx) (RatFunc.num_ne_zero hy))
(x * y).denom_ne_zero,
RatFunc.num_denom_mul]
#align ratfunc.int_degree_mul RatFunc.intDegree_mul
@[simp]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/RatFunc/Degree.lean | 85 | 91 | theorem intDegree_neg (x : RatFunc K) : intDegree (-x) = intDegree x := by |
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rw [hx, neg_zero]
· rw [intDegree, intDegree, ← natDegree_neg x.num]
exact
natDegree_sub_eq_of_prod_eq (num_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr hx)) (denom_ne_zero (-x))
(neg_ne_zero.mpr (num_ne_zero hx)) (denom_ne_zero x) (num_denom_neg x)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.ExpChar
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
#align_import algebra.char_p.two from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7f1ba1a333d66eed531ecb4092493cd1b6715450"
variable {R ι : Type*}
namespace CharTwo
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [CharP R 2]
theorem two_eq_zero : (2 : R) = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_two, CharP.cast_eq_zero]
#align char_two.two_eq_zero CharTwo.two_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem add_self_eq_zero (x : R) : x + x = 0 := by rw [← two_smul R x, two_eq_zero, zero_smul]
#align char_two.add_self_eq_zero CharTwo.add_self_eq_zero
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit0_eq_zero : (bit0 : R → R) = 0 := by
funext
exact add_self_eq_zero _
#align char_two.bit0_eq_zero CharTwo.bit0_eq_zero
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem bit0_apply_eq_zero (x : R) : (bit0 x : R) = 0 := by simp
#align char_two.bit0_apply_eq_zero CharTwo.bit0_apply_eq_zero
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit1_eq_one : (bit1 : R → R) = 1 := by
funext
simp [bit1]
#align char_two.bit1_eq_one CharTwo.bit1_eq_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
| Mathlib/Algebra/CharP/Two.lean | 55 | 55 | theorem bit1_apply_eq_one (x : R) : (bit1 x : R) = 1 := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.BilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Minpoly
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Trace
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.PrimitiveElement
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.MinpolyDiv
#align_import ring_theory.trace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
universe u v w z
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [CommRing T]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra R T]
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
variable {ι κ : Type w} [Fintype ι]
open FiniteDimensional
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
open LinearMap
open Matrix
open scoped Matrix
namespace Algebra
variable (b : Basis ι R S)
variable (R S)
noncomputable def trace : S →ₗ[R] R :=
(LinearMap.trace R S).comp (lmul R S).toLinearMap
#align algebra.trace Algebra.trace
variable {S}
-- Not a `simp` lemma since there are more interesting ways to rewrite `trace R S x`,
-- for example `trace_trace`
theorem trace_apply (x) : trace R S x = LinearMap.trace R S (lmul R S x) :=
rfl
#align algebra.trace_apply Algebra.trace_apply
theorem trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis (h : ¬∃ s : Finset S, Nonempty (Basis s R S)) :
trace R S = 0 := by ext s; simp [trace_apply, LinearMap.trace, h]
#align algebra.trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis Algebra.trace_eq_zero_of_not_exists_basis
variable {R}
-- Can't be a `simp` lemma because it depends on a choice of basis
theorem trace_eq_matrix_trace [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι R S) (s : S) :
trace R S s = Matrix.trace (Algebra.leftMulMatrix b s) := by
rw [trace_apply, LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace _ b, ← toMatrix_lmul_eq]; rfl
#align algebra.trace_eq_matrix_trace Algebra.trace_eq_matrix_trace
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Trace.lean | 115 | 119 | theorem trace_algebraMap_of_basis (x : R) : trace R S (algebraMap R S x) = Fintype.card ι • x := by |
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [trace_apply, LinearMap.trace_eq_matrix_trace R b, Matrix.trace]
convert Finset.sum_const x
simp [-coe_lmul_eq_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.RestrictScalars
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.comp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section Composition
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {s' t' : Set 𝕜'} {h : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {h₁ : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {h₂ : 𝕜' → 𝕜'} {h' h₂' : 𝕜'}
{h₁' : 𝕜} {g₁ : 𝕜' → F} {g₁' : F} {L' : Filter 𝕜'} {y : 𝕜'} (x)
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh hL).hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_deriv_at_filter.scomp HasDerivAtFilter.scomp
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hy : y = h x) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') : HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hh.continuousAt, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall hs⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp_has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivAt x hh hs
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| hh.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp HasDerivWithinAt.scomp
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hst
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh hh.continuousAt
#align has_deriv_at.scomp HasDerivAt.scomp
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh).hasStrictDerivAt
#align has_strict_deriv_at.scomp HasStrictDerivAt.scomp
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) : HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
HasDerivWithinAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivWithinAt hh (mapsTo_univ _ _)
#align has_deriv_at.scomp_has_deriv_within_at HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivWithinAt x hh
theorem derivWithin.scomp (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' g₁ t' (h x))
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s t') (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
derivWithin (g₁ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h s x • derivWithin g₁ t' (h x) :=
(HasDerivWithinAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivWithinAt hh.hasDerivWithinAt hs).derivWithin hxs
#align deriv_within.scomp derivWithin.scomp
theorem derivWithin.scomp_of_eq (hg : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜' g₁ t' y)
(hh : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 h s x) (hs : MapsTo h s t') (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hy : y = h x) :
derivWithin (g₁ ∘ h) s x = derivWithin h s x • derivWithin g₁ t' (h x) := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact derivWithin.scomp x hg hh hs hxs
theorem deriv.scomp (hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' g₁ (h x)) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) :
deriv (g₁ ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g₁ (h x) :=
(HasDerivAt.scomp x hg.hasDerivAt hh.hasDerivAt).deriv
#align deriv.scomp deriv.scomp
theorem deriv.scomp_of_eq
(hg : DifferentiableAt 𝕜' g₁ y) (hh : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 h x) (hy : y = h x) :
deriv (g₁ ∘ h) x = deriv h x • deriv g₁ (h x) := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact deriv.scomp x hg hh
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x) {L'' : Filter E}
(hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' (f x) L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L'')
(hL : Tendsto f L'' L') : HasFDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x L'' := by
convert (hh₂.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hf hL
ext x
simp [mul_comm]
#align has_deriv_at_filter.comp_has_fderiv_at_filter HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter_of_eq
{f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x) {L'' : Filter E}
(hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' y L') (hf : HasFDerivAtFilter f f' x L'')
(hL : Tendsto f L'' L') (hy : y = f x) : HasFDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x L'' := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hL
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [HasStrictDerivAt] at hh
convert (hh.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hf
ext x
simp [mul_comm]
#align has_strict_deriv_at.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt
theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) : HasFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hf.continuousAt
#align has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_at HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf hf.continuousWithinAt
#align has_deriv_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s} (x)
(hh : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s t} (x)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' t (f x)) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x :=
hh.comp_hasFDerivAtFilter x hf <| hf.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.comp_has_fderiv_within_at HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_of_eq {f : E → 𝕜'} {f' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'} {s t} (x)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' t y) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hst : MapsTo f s t)
(hy : y = f x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ f) (h₂' • f') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh; exact hh.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf hst
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x L := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh hL
#align has_deriv_at_filter.comp HasDerivAtFilter.comp
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.comp_of_eq (hh₂ : HasDerivAtFilter h₂ h₂' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAtFilter (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x L := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s s') :
HasDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') s x := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.comp HasDerivWithinAt.comp
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.comp_of_eq (hh₂ : HasDerivWithinAt h₂ h₂' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') s x := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh hst
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.comp (hh₂ : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' (h x)) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) :
HasDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x :=
hh₂.comp x hh hh.continuousAt
#align has_deriv_at.comp HasDerivAt.comp
theorem HasDerivAt.comp_of_eq
(hh₂ : HasDerivAt h₂ h₂' y) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x := by
rw [hy] at hh₂; exact hh₂.comp x hh
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Comp.lean | 267 | 270 | theorem HasStrictDerivAt.comp (hh₂ : HasStrictDerivAt h₂ h₂' (h x)) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (h₂ ∘ h) (h₂' * h') x := by |
rw [mul_comm]
exact hh₂.scomp x hh
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
#align_import data.nat.gcd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
namespace Nat
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
#align nat.gcd_greatest Nat.gcd_greatest
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m * k) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + m * k), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (k * m + n) = gcd m n := by simp [add_comm _ n]
#align nat.gcd_mul_right_add_right Nat.gcd_mul_right_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (m * k + n) = gcd m n := by simp [add_comm _ n]
#align nat.gcd_mul_left_add_right Nat.gcd_mul_left_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + k * n) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_right_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_left Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + n * k) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_left_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_left Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (k * n + m) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_add_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_mul_right_add_left Nat.gcd_mul_right_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (n * k + m) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_add_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_mul_left_add_left Nat.gcd_mul_left_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_self_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m) = gcd m n :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (gcd_add_mul_right_right m n 1)
#align nat.gcd_add_self_right Nat.gcd_add_self_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_self_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_self_left Nat.gcd_add_self_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_add_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) m = gcd n m := by rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_left]
#align nat.gcd_self_add_left Nat.gcd_self_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_add_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (m + n) = gcd m n := by
rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_right]
#align nat.gcd_self_add_right Nat.gcd_self_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd (n - m) m = gcd n m := by
calc
gcd (n - m) m = gcd (n - m + m) m := by rw [← gcd_add_self_left (n - m) m]
_ = gcd n m := by rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_sub_self_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd m (n - m) = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_sub_self_left h, gcd_comm]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_sub_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd (n - m) n = gcd m n := by
have := Nat.sub_add_cancel h
rw [gcd_comm m n, ← this, gcd_add_self_left (n - m) m]
have : gcd (n - m) n = gcd (n - m) m := by
nth_rw 2 [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
convert this
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_sub_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd n (n - m) = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_self_sub_left h, gcd_comm]
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align nat.lcm_dvd_mul Nat.lcm_dvd_mul
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
#align nat.lcm_dvd_iff Nat.lcm_dvd_iff
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
#align nat.lcm_pos Nat.lcm_pos
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff h, dvd_div_iff h, ← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
instance (m n : ℕ) : Decidable (Coprime m n) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (gcd m n = 1))
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 150 | 151 | theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by |
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α F F' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
open scoped Classical
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → F'} {s : Set α}
noncomputable irreducible_def condexp (m : MeasurableSpace α) {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) (f : α → F') : α → F' :=
if hm : m ≤ m0 then
if h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) ∧ Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else (@aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ m m0 μ hm h.1 _).mk
(@condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hm μ h.1 f)
else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.condexp MeasureTheory.condexp
-- We define notation `μ[f|m]` for the conditional expectation of `f` with respect to `m`.
scoped notation μ "[" f "|" m "]" => MeasureTheory.condexp m μ f
theorem condexp_of_not_le (hm_not : ¬m ≤ m0) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_neg hm_not]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_le MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_le
theorem condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) (hμm_not : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)) :
μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_pos hm, dif_neg]; push_neg; exact fun h => absurd h hμm_not
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
μ[f|m] =
if Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1.mk (condexpL1 hm μ f)
else 0 := by
rw [condexp, dif_pos hm]
simp only [hμm, Ne, true_and_iff]
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [dif_pos hf, if_pos hf]
· rw [dif_neg hf, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm, if_pos hfi, if_pos hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_const (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : F') [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
μ[fun _ : α => c|m] = fun _ => c :=
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _) (integrable_const c)
#align measure_theory.condexp_const MeasureTheory.condexp_const
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (f : α → F') :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1 hm μ f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [if_pos hfi]
by_cases hfm : StronglyMeasurable[m] f
· rw [if_pos hfm]
exact (condexpL1_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' hfm)
hfi).symm
· rw [if_neg hfm]
exact (AEStronglyMeasurable'.ae_eq_mk aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1).symm
rw [if_neg hfi, condexpL1_undef hfi]
exact (coeFn_zero _ _ _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1 MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1CLM F' hm μ (hf.toL1 f) := by
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [condexpL1_eq hf]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1_clm MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM
theorem condexp_undef (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_undef MeasureTheory.condexp_undef
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Basic.lean | 169 | 176 | theorem condexp_zero : μ[(0 : α → F')|m] = 0 := by |
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _) (integrable_zero _ _ _)
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.is_diag from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"55e2dfde0cff928ce5c70926a3f2c7dee3e2dd99"
namespace Matrix
variable {α β R n m : Type*}
open Function
open Matrix Kronecker
def IsDiag [Zero α] (A : Matrix n n α) : Prop :=
Pairwise fun i j => A i j = 0
#align matrix.is_diag Matrix.IsDiag
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_diagonal [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] (d : n → α) : (diagonal d).IsDiag := fun _ _ =>
Matrix.diagonal_apply_ne _
#align matrix.is_diag_diagonal Matrix.isDiag_diagonal
theorem IsDiag.diagonal_diag [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsDiag) :
diagonal (diag A) = A :=
ext fun i j => by
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq, diag]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij, h hij]
#align matrix.is_diag.diagonal_diag Matrix.IsDiag.diagonal_diag
theorem isDiag_iff_diagonal_diag [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix n n α) :
A.IsDiag ↔ diagonal (diag A) = A :=
⟨IsDiag.diagonal_diag, fun hd => hd ▸ isDiag_diagonal (diag A)⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_iff_diagonal_diag Matrix.isDiag_iff_diagonal_diag
theorem isDiag_of_subsingleton [Zero α] [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) : A.IsDiag :=
fun i j h => (h <| Subsingleton.elim i j).elim
#align matrix.is_diag_of_subsingleton Matrix.isDiag_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_zero [Zero α] : (0 : Matrix n n α).IsDiag := fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align matrix.is_diag_zero Matrix.isDiag_zero
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_one [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] : (1 : Matrix n n α).IsDiag := fun _ _ =>
one_apply_ne
#align matrix.is_diag_one Matrix.isDiag_one
theorem IsDiag.map [Zero α] [Zero β] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) {f : α → β} (hf : f 0 = 0) :
(A.map f).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hf]
#align matrix.is_diag.map Matrix.IsDiag.map
theorem IsDiag.neg [AddGroup α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) : (-A).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h]
#align matrix.is_diag.neg Matrix.IsDiag.neg
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_neg_iff [AddGroup α] {A : Matrix n n α} : (-A).IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨fun ha _ _ h => neg_eq_zero.1 (ha h), IsDiag.neg⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_neg_iff Matrix.isDiag_neg_iff
theorem IsDiag.add [AddZeroClass α] {A B : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) (hb : B.IsDiag) :
(A + B).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hb h]
#align matrix.is_diag.add Matrix.IsDiag.add
theorem IsDiag.sub [AddGroup α] {A B : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) (hb : B.IsDiag) :
(A - B).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hb h]
#align matrix.is_diag.sub Matrix.IsDiag.sub
theorem IsDiag.smul [Monoid R] [AddMonoid α] [DistribMulAction R α] (k : R) {A : Matrix n n α}
(ha : A.IsDiag) : (k • A).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h]
#align matrix.is_diag.smul Matrix.IsDiag.smul
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_smul_one (n) [Semiring α] [DecidableEq n] (k : α) :
(k • (1 : Matrix n n α)).IsDiag :=
isDiag_one.smul k
#align matrix.is_diag_smul_one Matrix.isDiag_smul_one
theorem IsDiag.transpose [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) : Aᵀ.IsDiag := fun _ _ h =>
ha h.symm
#align matrix.is_diag.transpose Matrix.IsDiag.transpose
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_transpose_iff [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} : Aᵀ.IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨IsDiag.transpose, IsDiag.transpose⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_transpose_iff Matrix.isDiag_transpose_iff
theorem IsDiag.conjTranspose [Semiring α] [StarRing α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) :
Aᴴ.IsDiag :=
ha.transpose.map (star_zero _)
#align matrix.is_diag.conj_transpose Matrix.IsDiag.conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_conjTranspose_iff [Semiring α] [StarRing α] {A : Matrix n n α} :
Aᴴ.IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨fun ha => by
convert ha.conjTranspose
simp, IsDiag.conjTranspose⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_conj_transpose_iff Matrix.isDiag_conjTranspose_iff
theorem IsDiag.submatrix [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) {f : m → n}
(hf : Injective f) : (A.submatrix f f).IsDiag := fun _ _ h => ha (hf.ne h)
#align matrix.is_diag.submatrix Matrix.IsDiag.submatrix
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/IsDiag.lean | 143 | 149 | theorem IsDiag.kronecker [MulZeroClass α] {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix n n α} (hA : A.IsDiag)
(hB : B.IsDiag) : (A ⊗ₖ B).IsDiag := by |
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ h
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff, Ne, not_and_or] at h
cases' h with hac hbd
· simp [hA hac]
· simp [hB hbd]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL1
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α F F' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
open scoped Classical
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → F'} {s : Set α}
noncomputable irreducible_def condexp (m : MeasurableSpace α) {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) (f : α → F') : α → F' :=
if hm : m ≤ m0 then
if h : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) ∧ Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else (@aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ m m0 μ hm h.1 _).mk
(@condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hm μ h.1 f)
else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.condexp MeasureTheory.condexp
-- We define notation `μ[f|m]` for the conditional expectation of `f` with respect to `m`.
scoped notation μ "[" f "|" m "]" => MeasureTheory.condexp m μ f
theorem condexp_of_not_le (hm_not : ¬m ≤ m0) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_neg hm_not]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_le MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_le
theorem condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) (hμm_not : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)) :
μ[f|m] = 0 := by rw [condexp, dif_pos hm, dif_neg]; push_neg; exact fun h => absurd h hμm_not
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_not_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_sigmaFinite (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] :
μ[f|m] =
if Integrable f μ then
if StronglyMeasurable[m] f then f
else aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1.mk (condexpL1 hm μ f)
else 0 := by
rw [condexp, dif_pos hm]
simp only [hμm, Ne, true_and_iff]
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [dif_pos hf, if_pos hf]
· rw [dif_neg hf, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.condexp_of_sigmaFinite
theorem condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm, if_pos hfi, if_pos hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_const (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : F') [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
μ[fun _ : α => c|m] = fun _ => c :=
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _) (integrable_const c)
#align measure_theory.condexp_const MeasureTheory.condexp_const
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (f : α → F') :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1 hm μ f := by
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [if_pos hfi]
by_cases hfm : StronglyMeasurable[m] f
· rw [if_pos hfm]
exact (condexpL1_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' hfm)
hfi).symm
· rw [if_neg hfm]
exact (AEStronglyMeasurable'.ae_eq_mk aestronglyMeasurable'_condexpL1).symm
rw [if_neg hfi, condexpL1_undef hfi]
exact (coeFn_zero _ _ _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1 MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1
theorem condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] condexpL1CLM F' hm μ (hf.toL1 f) := by
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [condexpL1_eq hf]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_condexp_L1_clm MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1CLM
theorem condexp_undef (hf : ¬Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite, if_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.condexp_undef MeasureTheory.condexp_undef
@[simp]
theorem condexp_zero : μ[(0 : α → F')|m] = 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact
condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (@stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _) (integrable_zero _ _ _)
#align measure_theory.condexp_zero MeasureTheory.condexp_zero
theorem stronglyMeasurable_condexp : StronglyMeasurable[m] (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
rw [condexp_of_sigmaFinite hm]
split_ifs with hfi hfm
· exact hfm
· exact AEStronglyMeasurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk _
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_condexp MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_condexp
theorem condexp_congr_ae (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).trans
(Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (by rw [condexpL1_congr_ae hm h])
(condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm g).symm)
#align measure_theory.condexp_congr_ae MeasureTheory.condexp_congr_ae
theorem condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable' (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → F'}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hfi : Integrable f μ) : μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ] f := by
refine ((condexp_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk).trans ?_).trans hf.ae_eq_mk.symm
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable hm hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk
((integrable_congr hf.ae_eq_mk).mp hfi)]
#align measure_theory.condexp_of_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.condexp_of_aestronglyMeasurable'
theorem integrable_condexp : Integrable (μ[f|m]) μ := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; exact integrable_zero _ _ _
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (integrable_condexpL1 f).congr (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).symm
#align measure_theory.integrable_condexp MeasureTheory.integrable_condexp
theorem setIntegral_condexp (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) : ∫ x in s, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
rw [setIntegral_congr_ae (hm s hs) ((condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm f).mono fun x hx _ => hx)]
exact setIntegral_condexpL1 hf hs
#align measure_theory.set_integral_condexp MeasureTheory.setIntegral_condexp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")] alias set_integral_condexp := setIntegral_condexp
theorem integral_condexp (hm : m ≤ m0) [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
suffices ∫ x in Set.univ, (μ[f|m]) x ∂μ = ∫ x in Set.univ, f x ∂μ by
simp_rw [integral_univ] at this; exact this
exact setIntegral_condexp hm hf (@MeasurableSet.univ _ m)
#align measure_theory.integral_condexp MeasureTheory.integral_condexp
theorem ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
{f g : α → F'} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg_int_finite : ∀ s, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → IntegrableOn g s μ)
(hg_eq : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet[m] s → μ s < ∞ → ∫ x in s, g x ∂μ = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) : g =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm hg_int_finite
(fun s _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn) (fun s hs hμs => ?_) hgm
(StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' stronglyMeasurable_condexp)
rw [hg_eq s hs hμs, setIntegral_condexp hm hf hs]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_set_integral_eq := ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq
theorem condexp_bot' [hμ : NeZero μ] (f : α → F') :
μ[f|⊥] = fun _ => (μ Set.univ).toReal⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
by_cases hμ_finite : IsFiniteMeasure μ
swap
· have h : ¬SigmaFinite (μ.trim bot_le) := by rwa [sigmaFinite_trim_bot_iff]
rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ_finite
rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite bot_le h]
simp only [hμ_finite, ENNReal.top_toReal, inv_zero, zero_smul]
rfl
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [integral_undef hf, smul_zero, condexp_undef hf]; rfl
have h_meas : StronglyMeasurable[⊥] (μ[f|⊥]) := stronglyMeasurable_condexp
obtain ⟨c, h_eq⟩ := stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff.mp h_meas
rw [h_eq]
have h_integral : ∫ x, (μ[f|⊥]) x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ := integral_condexp bot_le hf
simp_rw [h_eq, integral_const] at h_integral
rw [← h_integral, ← smul_assoc, smul_eq_mul, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul]
rw [Ne, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨NeZero.ne _, measure_ne_top μ Set.univ⟩
#align measure_theory.condexp_bot' MeasureTheory.condexp_bot'
theorem condexp_bot_ae_eq (f : α → F') :
μ[f|⊥] =ᵐ[μ] fun _ => (μ Set.univ).toReal⁻¹ • ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· rw [ae_zero]; exact eventually_bot
· exact eventually_of_forall <| congr_fun (condexp_bot' f)
#align measure_theory.condexp_bot_ae_eq MeasureTheory.condexp_bot_ae_eq
theorem condexp_bot [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → F') : μ[f|⊥] = fun _ => ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
refine (condexp_bot' f).trans ?_; rw [measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, inv_one, one_smul]
#align measure_theory.condexp_bot MeasureTheory.condexp_bot
theorem condexp_add (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
μ[f + g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] + μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; simp
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; simp
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).trans ?_
rw [condexpL1_add hf hg]
exact (coeFn_add _ _).trans
((condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).symm.add (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).symm)
#align measure_theory.condexp_add MeasureTheory.condexp_add
theorem condexp_finset_sum {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α → F'}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) : μ[∑ i ∈ s, f i|m] =ᵐ[μ] ∑ i ∈ s, μ[f i|m] := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s his heq hf
· rw [Finset.sum_empty, Finset.sum_empty, condexp_zero]
· rw [Finset.sum_insert his, Finset.sum_insert his]
exact (condexp_add (hf i <| Finset.mem_insert_self i s) <|
integrable_finset_sum' _ fun j hmem => hf j <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hmem).trans
((EventuallyEq.refl _ _).add (heq fun j hmem => hf j <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hmem))
#align measure_theory.condexp_finset_sum MeasureTheory.condexp_finset_sum
theorem condexp_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F') : μ[c • f|m] =ᵐ[μ] c • μ[f|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; simp
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; simp
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
refine (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).trans ?_
rw [condexpL1_smul c f]
refine (@condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 _ _ _ _ _ m _ _ hm _ f).mp ?_
refine (coeFn_smul c (condexpL1 hm μ f)).mono fun x hx1 hx2 => ?_
simp only [hx1, hx2, Pi.smul_apply]
#align measure_theory.condexp_smul MeasureTheory.condexp_smul
theorem condexp_neg (f : α → F') : μ[-f|m] =ᵐ[μ] -μ[f|m] := by
letI : Module ℝ (α → F') := @Pi.module α (fun _ => F') ℝ _ _ fun _ => inferInstance
calc
μ[-f|m] = μ[(-1 : ℝ) • f|m] := by rw [neg_one_smul ℝ f]
_ =ᵐ[μ] (-1 : ℝ) • μ[f|m] := condexp_smul (-1) f
_ = -μ[f|m] := neg_one_smul ℝ (μ[f|m])
#align measure_theory.condexp_neg MeasureTheory.condexp_neg
theorem condexp_sub (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
μ[f - g|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] - μ[g|m] := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact (condexp_add hf hg.neg).trans (EventuallyEq.rfl.add (condexp_neg g))
#align measure_theory.condexp_sub MeasureTheory.condexp_sub
theorem condexp_condexp_of_le {m₁ m₂ m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hm₁₂ : m₁ ≤ m₂)
(hm₂ : m₂ ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm₂)] : μ[μ[f|m₂]|m₁] =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m₁] := by
by_cases hμm₁ : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hm₁₂.trans hm₂))
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite (hm₁₂.trans hm₂) hμm₁]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim (hm₁₂.trans hm₂)) := hμm₁
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_undef hf, condexp_zero]; rfl
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' (hm₁₂.trans hm₂)
(fun s _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn)
(fun s _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn) ?_
(StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' stronglyMeasurable_condexp)
(StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' stronglyMeasurable_condexp)
intro s hs _
rw [setIntegral_condexp (hm₁₂.trans hm₂) integrable_condexp hs]
rw [setIntegral_condexp (hm₁₂.trans hm₂) hf hs, setIntegral_condexp hm₂ hf (hm₁₂ s hs)]
#align measure_theory.condexp_condexp_of_le MeasureTheory.condexp_condexp_of_le
theorem condexp_mono {E} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup E] [CompleteSpace E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[OrderedSMul ℝ E] {f g : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
μ[f|m] ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[g|m] := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
exact (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).trans_le
((condexpL1_mono hf hg hfg).trans_eq (condexp_ae_eq_condexpL1 hm _).symm)
#align measure_theory.condexp_mono MeasureTheory.condexp_mono
theorem condexp_nonneg {E} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup E] [CompleteSpace E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[OrderedSMul ℝ E] {f : α → E} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
· rw [(condexp_zero.symm : (0 : α → E) = μ[0|m])]
exact condexp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hfint hf
· rw [condexp_undef hfint]
#align measure_theory.condexp_nonneg MeasureTheory.condexp_nonneg
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Basic.lean | 372 | 377 | theorem condexp_nonpos {E} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup E] [CompleteSpace E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[OrderedSMul ℝ E] {f : α → E} (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : μ[f|m] ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 := by |
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
· rw [(condexp_zero.symm : (0 : α → E) = μ[0|m])]
exact condexp_mono hfint (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf
· rw [condexp_undef hfint]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pythagorean_triples from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
#align sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
#align int.sq_ne_two_mod_four Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
#align pythagorean_triple PythagoreanTriple
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple_comm pythagoreanTriple_comm
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align pythagorean_triple.zero PythagoreanTriple.zero
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem eq : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
#align pythagorean_triple.eq PythagoreanTriple.eq
@[symm]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 73 | 73 | theorem symm : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by | rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpOrder
#align_import measure_theory.function.l1_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ccdbfb6e5614667af5aa3ab2d50885e0ef44a46f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} [MeasurableSpace δ]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup β]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup γ]
namespace MeasureTheory
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by simp only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by
simp only [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_edist_triangle {f g h : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hh : AEStronglyMeasurable h μ) :
(∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (h a) ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, edist (g a) (h a) ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_left' (hf.edist hh)]
refine lintegral_mono fun a => ?_
apply edist_triangle_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_edist_triangle MeasureTheory.lintegral_edist_triangle
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_zero : (∫⁻ _ : α, ‖(0 : β)‖₊ ∂μ) = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_left {f : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (g : α → γ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_left' hf.ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_right (f : α → β) {g : α → γ} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' _ hg.ennnorm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_neg {f : α → β} : (∫⁻ a, ‖(-f) a‖₊ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, nnnorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg
def HasFiniteIntegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
(∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ ((∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_norm MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, edist_dist, dist_zero_right]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_edist MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) < ∞ := by
rw [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg h]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_real MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : HasFiniteIntegral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ ‖g a‖) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm] at *
calc
(∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal ‖g a‖ ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun a h => ofReal_le_ofReal h)
_ < ∞ := hg
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : HasFiniteIntegral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hg.mono <| h.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono' MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono'
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hf.mono <| EventuallyEq.le <| EventuallyEq.symm h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.congr' MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.congr'
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_congr' MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_congr'
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hf.congr' <| h.fun_comp norm
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.congr MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.congr
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_congr' <| h.fun_comp norm
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_congr MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_congr
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff {c : β} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ := by
simp [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_const, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ENNReal.mul_eq_top,
or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_const_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : β) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => c) μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff.2 (Or.inr <| measure_lt_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_const MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_const
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {C : ℝ}
(hC : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ C) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
(hasFiniteIntegral_const C).mono' hC
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_of_bounded MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.of_finite [Finite α] [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype α
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded <| ae_of_all μ <| norm_le_pi_norm f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias hasFiniteIntegral_of_fintype := HasFiniteIntegral.of_finite
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono' hμ le_rfl) h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : HasFiniteIntegral f μ)
(hν : HasFiniteIntegral f ν) : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_add_measure] at *
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨hμ, hν⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_right <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.left_of_add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ν :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_left <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.right_of_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_add_measure {f : α → β} :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν) ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ ∧ HasFiniteIntegral f ν :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(hc : c ≠ ∞) : HasFiniteIntegral f (c • μ) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_smul_measure] at *
exact mul_lt_top hc h.ne
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.smul_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.smul_measure
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (0 : Measure α) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_zero_measure, zero_lt_top]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure
variable (α β μ)
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_zero : HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => (0 : β)) μ := by
simp [HasFiniteIntegral]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_zero MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_zero
variable {α β μ}
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.neg {f : α → β} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (-f) μ := by simpa [HasFiniteIntegral] using hfi
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.neg MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.neg
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_neg_iff {f : α → β} : HasFiniteIntegral (-f) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, HasFiniteIntegral.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_neg_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_neg_iff
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.norm {f : α → β} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ := by
have eq : (fun a => (nnnorm ‖f a‖ : ℝ≥0∞)) = fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
funext
rw [nnnorm_norm]
rwa [HasFiniteIntegral, eq]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.norm MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_congr' <| eventually_of_forall fun x => norm_norm (f x)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_norm_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x).toReal) μ := by
have :
∀ x, (‖(f x).toReal‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨(f x).toReal, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg⟩ := by
intro x
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg]
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, this]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono fun x => ?_) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hf)
by_cases hfx : f x = ∞
· simp [hfx]
· lift f x to ℝ≥0 using hfx with fx h
simp [← h, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) := by
refine isFiniteMeasure_withDensity ((lintegral_mono fun x => ?_).trans_lt hfi).ne
exact Real.ofReal_le_ennnorm (f x)
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_withDensity_ofReal
-- variable [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace δ]
def Integrable {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ ∧ HasFiniteIntegral f μ
#align measure_theory.integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable
theorem memℒp_one_iff_integrable {f : α → β} : Memℒp f 1 μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [Integrable, HasFiniteIntegral, Memℒp, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable MeasureTheory.memℒp_one_iff_integrable
theorem Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem Integrable.aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.aemeasurable
theorem Integrable.hasFiniteIntegral {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hf.2
#align measure_theory.integrable.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.Integrable.hasFiniteIntegral
theorem Integrable.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ ‖g a‖) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.hasFiniteIntegral.mono h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono
theorem Integrable.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.hasFiniteIntegral.mono' h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono' MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono'
theorem Integrable.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : Integrable g μ :=
⟨hg, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.congr' h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.congr' MeasureTheory.Integrable.congr'
theorem integrable_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) :
Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h2f => h2f.congr' hg h, fun h2g => h2g.congr' hf <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_congr' MeasureTheory.integrable_congr'
theorem Integrable.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Integrable g μ :=
⟨hf.1.congr h, hf.2.congr h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.congr MeasureTheory.Integrable.congr
theorem integrable_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr h, fun hg => hg.congr h.symm⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_congr MeasureTheory.integrable_congr
theorem integrable_const_iff {c : β} : Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ := by
have : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun _ : α => c) μ := aestronglyMeasurable_const
rw [Integrable, and_iff_right this, hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff]
#align measure_theory.integrable_const_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem integrable_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : β) : Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ :=
integrable_const_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| measure_lt_top _ _
#align measure_theory.integrable_const MeasureTheory.integrable_const
@[simp]
theorem Integrable.of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
(μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → β) : Integrable (fun a ↦ f a) μ :=
⟨(StronglyMeasurable.of_finite f).aestronglyMeasurable, .of_finite⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")] alias integrable_of_fintype := Integrable.of_finite
theorem Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow
theorem Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Integrable (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) μ := by
by_cases h_zero : p = 0
· simp [h_zero, integrable_const]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, integrable_const]
exact hf.integrable_norm_rpow h_zero h_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow'
theorem Integrable.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨h.aestronglyMeasurable.mono_measure hμ, h.hasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure hμ⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono_measure
theorem Integrable.of_measure_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ)
{f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable f μ' := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.of_measure_le_smul c hc hμ'_le
#align measure_theory.integrable.of_measure_le_smul MeasureTheory.Integrable.of_measure_le_smul
theorem Integrable.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
Integrable f (μ + ν) := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hμ hν ⊢
refine ⟨hμ.aestronglyMeasurable.add_measure hν.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [snorm_one_add_measure, ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨hμ.snorm_lt_top, hν.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.add_measure
theorem Integrable.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f (μ + ν)) : Integrable f μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.left_of_add_measure
#align measure_theory.integrable.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.left_of_add_measure
theorem Integrable.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
Integrable f ν := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.right_of_add_measure
#align measure_theory.integrable.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.right_of_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integrable_add_measure {f : α → β} :
Integrable f (μ + ν) ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable f ν :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_add_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integrable_zero_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → β} :
Integrable f (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero_measure f, hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure f⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_zero_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_zero_measure
theorem integrable_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → β} {μ : ι → Measure α}
{s : Finset ι} : Integrable f (∑ i ∈ s, μ i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable f (μ i) := by
induction s using Finset.induction_on <;> simp [*]
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum_measure
theorem Integrable.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c • μ) := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.smul_measure hc
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_measure
theorem Integrable.smul_measure_nnreal {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0} :
Integrable f (c • μ) := by
apply h.smul_measure
simp
theorem integrable_smul_measure {f : α → β} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c • μ) ↔ Integrable f μ :=
⟨fun h => by
simpa only [smul_smul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h₁ h₂, one_smul] using
h.smul_measure (ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 h₁),
fun h => h.smul_measure h₂⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_smul_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_smul_measure
theorem integrable_inv_smul_measure {f : α → β} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c⁻¹ • μ) ↔ Integrable f μ :=
integrable_smul_measure (by simpa using h₂) (by simpa using h₁)
#align measure_theory.integrable_inv_smul_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_inv_smul_measure
theorem Integrable.to_average {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) : Integrable f ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [smul_zero]
· apply h.smul_measure
simpa
#align measure_theory.integrable.to_average MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average
theorem integrable_average [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} :
Integrable f ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) ↔ Integrable f μ :=
(eq_or_ne μ 0).by_cases (fun h => by simp [h]) fun h =>
integrable_smul_measure (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 <| measure_ne_top _ _)
(ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 <| mt Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.1 h)
#align measure_theory.integrable_average MeasureTheory.integrable_average
theorem integrable_map_measure {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ)) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Integrable g (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Integrable (g ∘ f) μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact memℒp_map_measure_iff hg hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_map_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_map_measure
theorem Integrable.comp_aemeasurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : Integrable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
(integrable_map_measure hg.aestronglyMeasurable hf).mp hg
#align measure_theory.integrable.comp_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.comp_aemeasurable
theorem Integrable.comp_measurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : Integrable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : Measurable f) : Integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
hg.comp_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.integrable.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.comp_measurable
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrable_map_iff {f : α → δ} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
{g : δ → β} : Integrable g (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Integrable (g ∘ f) μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact hf.memℒp_map_measure_iff
#align measurable_embedding.integrable_map_iff MeasurableEmbedding.integrable_map_iff
theorem integrable_map_equiv (f : α ≃ᵐ δ) (g : δ → β) :
Integrable g (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Integrable (g ∘ f) μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact f.memℒp_map_measure_iff
#align measure_theory.integrable_map_equiv MeasureTheory.integrable_map_equiv
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp {ν : Measure δ} {g : δ → β} {f : α → δ}
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν) :
Integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ Integrable g ν := by
rw [← hf.map_eq] at hg ⊢
exact (integrable_map_measure hg hf.measurable.aemeasurable).symm
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.integrable_comp MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb {f : α → δ} {ν} (h₁ : MeasurePreserving f μ ν)
(h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding f) {g : δ → β} : Integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ Integrable g ν :=
h₁.map_eq ▸ Iff.symm h₂.integrable_map_iff
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.integrable_comp_emb MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb
theorem lintegral_edist_lt_top {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_edist_triangle hf.aestronglyMeasurable aestronglyMeasurable_zero)
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 <| by
simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist]
exact ⟨hf.hasFiniteIntegral, hg.hasFiniteIntegral⟩)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_edist_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_edist_lt_top
variable (α β μ)
@[simp]
theorem integrable_zero : Integrable (fun _ => (0 : β)) μ := by
simp [Integrable, aestronglyMeasurable_const]
#align measure_theory.integrable_zero MeasureTheory.integrable_zero
variable {α β μ}
theorem Integrable.add' {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (f + g) μ :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, ‖f a + g a‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => by
-- After leanprover/lean4#2734, we need to do beta reduction before `exact mod_cast`
beta_reduce
exact mod_cast nnnorm_add_le _ _
_ = _ := lintegral_nnnorm_add_left hf.aestronglyMeasurable _
_ < ∞ := add_lt_top.2 ⟨hf.hasFiniteIntegral, hg.hasFiniteIntegral⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add' MeasureTheory.Integrable.add'
theorem Integrable.add {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (f + g) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.add hg.aestronglyMeasurable, hf.add' hg⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add MeasureTheory.Integrable.add
theorem integrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) : Integrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Finset.sum_induction f (fun g => Integrable g μ) (fun _ _ => Integrable.add)
(integrable_zero _ _ _) hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum'
theorem integrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) : Integrable (fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by
simpa only [← Finset.sum_apply] using integrable_finset_sum' s hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum
theorem Integrable.neg {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (-f) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.neg, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.neg MeasureTheory.Integrable.neg
@[simp]
theorem integrable_neg_iff {f : α → β} : Integrable (-f) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, Integrable.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_neg_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_neg_iff
@[simp]
lemma integrable_add_iff_integrable_right {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f + g + (-f) by simp only [add_neg_cancel_comm] ▸ h.add hf.neg,
fun h ↦ hf.add h⟩
@[simp]
lemma integrable_add_iff_integrable_left {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (g + f) μ ↔ Integrable g μ := by
rw [add_comm, integrable_add_iff_integrable_right hf]
lemma integrable_left_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ}
(h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(h_int : Integrable (f + g) μ) : Integrable f μ := by
refine h_int.mono' h_meas ?_
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with a haf hag
exact (Real.norm_of_nonneg haf).symm ▸ (le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).mpr hag
lemma integrable_right_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ}
(h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(h_int : Integrable (f + g) μ) : Integrable g μ :=
integrable_left_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg
((AEStronglyMeasurable.add_iff_right h_meas).mp h_int.aestronglyMeasurable)
hg hf (add_comm f g ▸ h_int)
lemma integrable_add_iff_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ} (h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨integrable_left_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg h_meas hf hg h,
integrable_right_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg h_meas hf hg h⟩, fun ⟨hf, hg⟩ ↦ hf.add hg⟩
lemma integrable_add_iff_of_nonpos {f g : α → ℝ} (h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) (hg : g ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ := by
rw [← integrable_neg_iff, ← integrable_neg_iff (f := f), ← integrable_neg_iff (f := g), neg_add]
exact integrable_add_iff_of_nonneg h_meas.neg (hf.mono (fun _ ↦ neg_nonneg_of_nonpos))
(hg.mono (fun _ ↦ neg_nonneg_of_nonpos))
@[simp]
lemma integrable_add_const_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {c : β} :
Integrable (fun x ↦ f x + c) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
integrable_add_iff_integrable_left (integrable_const _)
@[simp]
lemma integrable_const_add_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {c : β} :
Integrable (fun x ↦ c + f x) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
integrable_add_iff_integrable_right (integrable_const _)
theorem Integrable.sub {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (f - g) μ := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.integrable.sub MeasureTheory.Integrable.sub
theorem Integrable.norm {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.norm, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.norm⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.norm MeasureTheory.Integrable.norm
theorem Integrable.inf {β} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⊓ g) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact hf.inf hg
#align measure_theory.integrable.inf MeasureTheory.Integrable.inf
theorem Integrable.sup {β} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⊔ g) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact hf.sup hg
#align measure_theory.integrable.sup MeasureTheory.Integrable.sup
theorem Integrable.abs {β} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun a => |f a|) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.abs
#align measure_theory.integrable.abs MeasureTheory.Integrable.abs
theorem Integrable.bdd_mul {F : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing F] {f g : α → F} (hint : Integrable g μ)
(hm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hfbdd : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
Integrable (fun x => f x * g x) μ := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· rw [μ.eq_zero_of_isEmpty]
exact integrable_zero_measure
· refine ⟨hm.mul hint.1, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := hfbdd
have hCnonneg : 0 ≤ C := le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (hC hα.some)
have : (fun x => ‖f x * g x‖₊) ≤ fun x => ⟨C, hCnonneg⟩ * ‖g x‖₊ := by
intro x
simp only [nnnorm_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hC x) (zero_le _)
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono_nnreal this) ?_
simp only [ENNReal.coe_mul]
rw [lintegral_const_mul' _ _ ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (ne_of_lt hint.2)
#align measure_theory.integrable.bdd_mul MeasureTheory.Integrable.bdd_mul
theorem Integrable.essSup_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Integrable f μ) {g : α → 𝕜} (g_aestronglyMeasurable : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(ess_sup_g : essSup (fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ ≠ ∞) :
Integrable (fun x : α => g x • f x) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at *
refine ⟨g_aestronglyMeasurable.smul hf.1, ?_⟩
have h : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) / 1 = 1 / ∞ + 1 / 1 := by norm_num
have hg' : snorm g ∞ μ ≠ ∞ := by rwa [snorm_exponent_top]
calc
snorm (fun x : α => g x • f x) 1 μ ≤ _ := by
simpa using MeasureTheory.snorm_smul_le_mul_snorm hf.1 g_aestronglyMeasurable h
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.mul_lt_top hg' hf.2.ne
#align measure_theory.integrable.ess_sup_smul MeasureTheory.Integrable.essSup_smul
theorem Integrable.smul_essSup {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β]
{f : α → 𝕜} (hf : Integrable f μ) {g : α → β}
(g_aestronglyMeasurable : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(ess_sup_g : essSup (fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ ≠ ∞) :
Integrable (fun x : α => f x • g x) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at *
refine ⟨hf.1.smul g_aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have h : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) / 1 = 1 / 1 + 1 / ∞ := by norm_num
have hg' : snorm g ∞ μ ≠ ∞ := by rwa [snorm_exponent_top]
calc
snorm (fun x : α => f x • g x) 1 μ ≤ _ := by
simpa using MeasureTheory.snorm_smul_le_mul_snorm g_aestronglyMeasurable hf.1 h
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.mul_lt_top hf.2.ne hg'
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_ess_sup MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_essSup
theorem integrable_norm_iff {f : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Integrable (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [Integrable, and_iff_right hf, and_iff_right hf.norm, hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
#align measure_theory.integrable_norm_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_norm_iff
theorem integrable_of_norm_sub_le {f₀ f₁ : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hf₁_m : AEStronglyMeasurable f₁ μ)
(hf₀_i : Integrable f₀ μ) (hg_i : Integrable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f₀ a - f₁ a‖ ≤ g a) :
Integrable f₁ μ :=
haveI : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f₁ a‖ ≤ ‖f₀ a‖ + g a := by
apply h.mono
intro a ha
calc
‖f₁ a‖ ≤ ‖f₀ a‖ + ‖f₀ a - f₁ a‖ := norm_le_insert _ _
_ ≤ ‖f₀ a‖ + g a := add_le_add_left ha _
Integrable.mono' (hf₀_i.norm.add hg_i) hf₁_m this
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_norm_sub_le MeasureTheory.integrable_of_norm_sub_le
theorem Integrable.prod_mk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (fun x => (f x, g x)) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.prod_mk hg.aestronglyMeasurable,
(hf.norm.add' hg.norm).mono <|
eventually_of_forall fun x =>
calc
max ‖f x‖ ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ + ‖g x‖ := max_le_add_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ ≤ ‖‖f x‖ + ‖g x‖‖ := le_abs_self _⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.prod_mk MeasureTheory.Integrable.prod_mk
theorem Memℒp.integrable {q : ℝ≥0∞} (hq1 : 1 ≤ q) {f : α → β} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hfq : Memℒp f q μ) : Integrable f μ :=
memℒp_one_iff_integrable.mp (hfq.memℒp_of_exponent_le hq1)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable
theorem Integrable.measure_norm_ge_lt_top {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
μ { x | ε ≤ ‖f x‖ } < ∞ := by
rw [show { x | ε ≤ ‖f x‖ } = { x | ENNReal.ofReal ε ≤ ‖f x‖₊ } by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm]]
refine (meas_ge_le_mul_pow_snorm μ one_ne_zero ENNReal.one_ne_top hf.1 ?_).trans_lt ?_
· simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hε
apply ENNReal.mul_lt_top
· simpa only [ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one, Ne, ENNReal.inv_eq_top,
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hε
simpa only [ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one] using
(memℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 hf).snorm_ne_top
#align measure_theory.integrable.measure_ge_lt_top MeasureTheory.Integrable.measure_norm_ge_lt_top
lemma Integrable.measure_norm_gt_lt_top {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
μ {x | ε < ‖f x‖} < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (fun _ h ↦ (Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ h).le)) (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top hε)
lemma Integrable.measure_ge_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) :
μ {a : α | ε ≤ f a} < ∞ := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono ?_) (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top ε_pos)
intro x hx
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
exact hx.trans (le_abs_self _)
lemma Integrable.measure_le_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ} (c_neg : c < 0) :
μ {a : α | f a ≤ c} < ∞ := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono ?_) (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top (show 0 < -c by linarith))
intro x hx
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
exact (show -c ≤ - f x by linarith).trans (neg_le_abs _)
lemma Integrable.measure_gt_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) :
μ {a : α | ε < f a} < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (fun _ hx ↦ (Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ hx).le))
(Integrable.measure_ge_lt_top hf ε_pos)
lemma Integrable.measure_lt_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ} (c_neg : c < 0) :
μ {a : α | f a < c} < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (fun _ hx ↦ (Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ hx).le))
(Integrable.measure_le_lt_top hf c_neg)
theorem LipschitzWith.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {K K'} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : LipschitzWith K g) (hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
Integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable, hg.memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz hg' g0]
#align measure_theory.lipschitz_with.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz MeasureTheory.LipschitzWith.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz
theorem Integrable.real_toNNReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun x => ((f x).toNNReal : ℝ)) μ := by
refine
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable.real_toNNReal.coe_nnreal_real.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ((hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm _).1 hf.hasFiniteIntegral)
apply lintegral_mono
intro x
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal, abs_le, le_abs_self]
#align measure_theory.integrable.real_to_nnreal MeasureTheory.Integrable.real_toNNReal
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L1Space.lean | 927 | 931 | theorem ofReal_toReal_ae_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
(fun x => ENNReal.ofReal (f x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] f := by |
filter_upwards [hf]
intro x hx
simp only [hx.ne, ofReal_toReal, Ne, not_false_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid.VertexGroup
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Groupoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import category_theory.groupoid.subgroupoid from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
namespace CategoryTheory
open Set Groupoid
universe u v
variable {C : Type u} [Groupoid C]
@[ext]
structure Subgroupoid (C : Type u) [Groupoid C] where
arrows : ∀ c d : C, Set (c ⟶ d)
protected inv : ∀ {c d} {p : c ⟶ d}, p ∈ arrows c d → Groupoid.inv p ∈ arrows d c
protected mul : ∀ {c d e} {p}, p ∈ arrows c d → ∀ {q}, q ∈ arrows d e → p ≫ q ∈ arrows c e
#align category_theory.subgroupoid CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid
namespace Subgroupoid
variable (S : Subgroupoid C)
theorem inv_mem_iff {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) :
Groupoid.inv f ∈ S.arrows d c ↔ f ∈ S.arrows c d := by
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_inv] using S.inv h
· apply S.inv
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inv_mem_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inv_mem_iff
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {c d e : C} {f : c ⟶ d} {g : d ⟶ e} (hf : f ∈ S.arrows c d) :
f ≫ g ∈ S.arrows c e ↔ g ∈ S.arrows d e := by
constructor
· rintro h
suffices Groupoid.inv f ≫ f ≫ g ∈ S.arrows d e by
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc] using this
apply S.mul (S.inv hf) h
· apply S.mul hf
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mul_mem_cancel_left CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mul_mem_cancel_left
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {c d e : C} {f : c ⟶ d} {g : d ⟶ e} (hg : g ∈ S.arrows d e) :
f ≫ g ∈ S.arrows c e ↔ f ∈ S.arrows c d := by
constructor
· rintro h
suffices (f ≫ g) ≫ Groupoid.inv g ∈ S.arrows c d by
simpa only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id, Category.assoc] using this
apply S.mul h (S.inv hg)
· exact fun hf => S.mul hf hg
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mul_mem_cancel_right CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mul_mem_cancel_right
def objs : Set C :=
{c : C | (S.arrows c c).Nonempty}
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.objs CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.objs
theorem mem_objs_of_src {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : c ∈ S.objs :=
⟨f ≫ Groupoid.inv f, S.mul h (S.inv h)⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_objs_of_src CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_objs_of_src
theorem mem_objs_of_tgt {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : d ∈ S.objs :=
⟨Groupoid.inv f ≫ f, S.mul (S.inv h) h⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_objs_of_tgt CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_objs_of_tgt
theorem id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy (c : C) : c ∈ objs S → 𝟙 c ∈ S.arrows c c := by
rintro ⟨γ, hγ⟩
convert S.mul hγ (S.inv hγ)
simp only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy
theorem id_mem_of_src {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : 𝟙 c ∈ S.arrows c c :=
id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy S c (mem_objs_of_src S h)
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.id_mem_of_src CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.id_mem_of_src
theorem id_mem_of_tgt {c d : C} {f : c ⟶ d} (h : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : 𝟙 d ∈ S.arrows d d :=
id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy S d (mem_objs_of_tgt S h)
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.id_mem_of_tgt CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.id_mem_of_tgt
def asWideQuiver : Quiver C :=
⟨fun c d => Subtype <| S.arrows c d⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.as_wide_quiver CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.asWideQuiver
@[simps comp_coe, simps (config := .lemmasOnly) inv_coe]
instance coe : Groupoid S.objs where
Hom a b := S.arrows a.val b.val
id a := ⟨𝟙 a.val, id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy S a.val a.prop⟩
comp p q := ⟨p.val ≫ q.val, S.mul p.prop q.prop⟩
inv p := ⟨Groupoid.inv p.val, S.inv p.prop⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.coe CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_inv_coe' {c d : S.objs} (p : c ⟶ d) :
(CategoryTheory.inv p).val = CategoryTheory.inv p.val := by
simp only [← inv_eq_inv, coe_inv_coe]
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.coe_inv_coe' CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.coe_inv_coe'
def hom : S.objs ⥤ C where
obj c := c.val
map f := f.val
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.hom CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.hom
theorem hom.inj_on_objects : Function.Injective (hom S).obj := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ hcd
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]; exact hcd
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.hom.inj_on_objects CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.hom.inj_on_objects
theorem hom.faithful : ∀ c d, Function.Injective fun f : c ⟶ d => (hom S).map f := by
rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ ⟨d, hd⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ hfg; exact Subtype.eq hfg
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.hom.faithful CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.hom.faithful
def vertexSubgroup {c : C} (hc : c ∈ S.objs) : Subgroup (c ⟶ c) where
carrier := S.arrows c c
mul_mem' hf hg := S.mul hf hg
one_mem' := id_mem_of_nonempty_isotropy _ _ hc
inv_mem' hf := S.inv hf
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.vertex_subgroup CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.vertexSubgroup
@[coe] def toSet (S : Subgroupoid C) : Set (Σ c d : C, c ⟶ d) :=
{F | F.2.2 ∈ S.arrows F.1 F.2.1}
instance : SetLike (Subgroupoid C) (Σ c d : C, c ⟶ d) where
coe := toSet
coe_injective' := fun ⟨S, _, _⟩ ⟨T, _, _⟩ h => by ext c d f; apply Set.ext_iff.1 h ⟨c, d, f⟩
theorem mem_iff (S : Subgroupoid C) (F : Σ c d, c ⟶ d) : F ∈ S ↔ F.2.2 ∈ S.arrows F.1 F.2.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_iff
theorem le_iff (S T : Subgroupoid C) : S ≤ T ↔ ∀ {c d}, S.arrows c d ⊆ T.arrows c d := by
rw [SetLike.le_def, Sigma.forall]; exact forall_congr' fun c => Sigma.forall
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.le_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.le_iff
instance : Top (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨{ arrows := fun _ _ => Set.univ
mul := by intros; trivial
inv := by intros; trivial }⟩
theorem mem_top {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) : f ∈ (⊤ : Subgroupoid C).arrows c d :=
trivial
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_top CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_top
theorem mem_top_objs (c : C) : c ∈ (⊤ : Subgroupoid C).objs := by
dsimp [Top.top, objs]
simp only [univ_nonempty]
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_top_objs CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_top_objs
instance : Bot (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨{ arrows := fun _ _ => ∅
mul := False.elim
inv := False.elim }⟩
instance : Inhabited (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : Inf (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨fun S T =>
{ arrows := fun c d => S.arrows c d ∩ T.arrows c d
inv := fun hp ↦ ⟨S.inv hp.1, T.inv hp.2⟩
mul := fun hp _ hq ↦ ⟨S.mul hp.1 hq.1, T.mul hp.2 hq.2⟩ }⟩
instance : InfSet (Subgroupoid C) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ arrows := fun c d => ⋂ S ∈ s, Subgroupoid.arrows S c d
inv := fun hp ↦ by rw [mem_iInter₂] at hp ⊢; exact fun S hS => S.inv (hp S hS)
mul := fun hp _ hq ↦ by
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hp hq ⊢;
exact fun S hS => S.mul (hp S hS) (hq S hS) }⟩
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem mem_sInf_arrows {s : Set (Subgroupoid C)} {c d : C} {p : c ⟶ d} :
p ∈ (sInf s).arrows c d ↔ ∀ S ∈ s, p ∈ S.arrows c d :=
mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_sInf {s : Set (Subgroupoid C)} {p : Σ c d : C, c ⟶ d} :
p ∈ sInf s ↔ ∀ S ∈ s, p ∈ S :=
mem_sInf_arrows
instance : CompleteLattice (Subgroupoid C) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subgroupoid C) (by
refine fun s => ⟨fun S Ss F => ?_, fun T Tl F fT => ?_⟩ <;> simp only [mem_sInf]
exacts [fun hp => hp S Ss, fun S Ss => Tl Ss fT]) with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun S => empty_subset _
top := ⊤
le_top := fun S => subset_univ _
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun R S T RS RT _ pR => ⟨RS pR, RT pR⟩
inf_le_left := fun R S _ => And.left
inf_le_right := fun R S _ => And.right }
theorem le_objs {S T : Subgroupoid C} (h : S ≤ T) : S.objs ⊆ T.objs := fun s ⟨γ, hγ⟩ =>
⟨γ, @h ⟨s, s, γ⟩ hγ⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.le_objs CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.le_objs
def inclusion {S T : Subgroupoid C} (h : S ≤ T) : S.objs ⥤ T.objs where
obj s := ⟨s.val, le_objs h s.prop⟩
map f := ⟨f.val, @h ⟨_, _, f.val⟩ f.prop⟩
map_id _ := rfl
map_comp _ _ := rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inclusion CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inclusion
theorem inclusion_inj_on_objects {S T : Subgroupoid C} (h : S ≤ T) :
Function.Injective (inclusion h).obj := fun ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩ => by
simpa only [inclusion, Subtype.mk_eq_mk] using id
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inclusion_inj_on_objects CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inclusion_inj_on_objects
theorem inclusion_faithful {S T : Subgroupoid C} (h : S ≤ T) (s t : S.objs) :
Function.Injective fun f : s ⟶ t => (inclusion h).map f := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ⟨g, hg⟩ => by
-- Porting note: was `...; simpa only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk] using id`
dsimp only [inclusion]; rw [Subtype.mk_eq_mk, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]; exact id
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inclusion_faithful CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inclusion_faithful
theorem inclusion_refl {S : Subgroupoid C} : inclusion (le_refl S) = 𝟭 S.objs :=
Functor.hext (fun _ => rfl) fun _ _ _ => HEq.refl _
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inclusion_refl CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inclusion_refl
theorem inclusion_trans {R S T : Subgroupoid C} (k : R ≤ S) (h : S ≤ T) :
inclusion (k.trans h) = inclusion k ⋙ inclusion h :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inclusion_trans CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inclusion_trans
theorem inclusion_comp_embedding {S T : Subgroupoid C} (h : S ≤ T) : inclusion h ⋙ T.hom = S.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.inclusion_comp_embedding CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.inclusion_comp_embedding
inductive Discrete.Arrows : ∀ c d : C, (c ⟶ d) → Prop
| id (c : C) : Discrete.Arrows c c (𝟙 c)
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.discrete.arrows CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.Discrete.Arrows
def discrete : Subgroupoid C where
arrows c d := {p | Discrete.Arrows c d p}
inv := by rintro _ _ _ ⟨⟩; simp only [inv_eq_inv, IsIso.inv_id]; constructor
mul := by rintro _ _ _ _ ⟨⟩ _ ⟨⟩; rw [Category.comp_id]; constructor
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.discrete CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.discrete
theorem mem_discrete_iff {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) :
f ∈ discrete.arrows c d ↔ ∃ h : c = d, f = eqToHom h :=
⟨by rintro ⟨⟩; exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, by rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩; constructor⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_discrete_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_discrete_iff
structure IsWide : Prop where
wide : ∀ c, 𝟙 c ∈ S.arrows c c
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_wide CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsWide
theorem isWide_iff_objs_eq_univ : S.IsWide ↔ S.objs = Set.univ := by
constructor
· rintro h
ext x; constructor <;> simp only [top_eq_univ, mem_univ, imp_true_iff, forall_true_left]
apply mem_objs_of_src S (h.wide x)
· rintro h
refine ⟨fun c => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨γ, γS⟩ := (le_of_eq h.symm : ⊤ ⊆ S.objs) (Set.mem_univ c)
exact id_mem_of_src S γS
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_wide_iff_objs_eq_univ CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.isWide_iff_objs_eq_univ
theorem IsWide.id_mem {S : Subgroupoid C} (Sw : S.IsWide) (c : C) : 𝟙 c ∈ S.arrows c c :=
Sw.wide c
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_wide.id_mem CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsWide.id_mem
theorem IsWide.eqToHom_mem {S : Subgroupoid C} (Sw : S.IsWide) {c d : C} (h : c = d) :
eqToHom h ∈ S.arrows c d := by cases h; simp only [eqToHom_refl]; apply Sw.id_mem c
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_wide.eq_to_hom_mem CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsWide.eqToHom_mem
structure IsNormal extends IsWide S : Prop where
conj : ∀ {c d} (p : c ⟶ d) {γ : c ⟶ c}, γ ∈ S.arrows c c → Groupoid.inv p ≫ γ ≫ p ∈ S.arrows d d
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_normal CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.conj' {S : Subgroupoid C} (Sn : IsNormal S) :
∀ {c d} (p : d ⟶ c) {γ : c ⟶ c}, γ ∈ S.arrows c c → p ≫ γ ≫ Groupoid.inv p ∈ S.arrows d d :=
fun p γ hs => by convert Sn.conj (Groupoid.inv p) hs; simp
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_normal.conj' CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsNormal.conj'
theorem IsNormal.conjugation_bij (Sn : IsNormal S) {c d} (p : c ⟶ d) :
Set.BijOn (fun γ : c ⟶ c => Groupoid.inv p ≫ γ ≫ p) (S.arrows c c) (S.arrows d d) := by
refine ⟨fun γ γS => Sn.conj p γS, fun γ₁ _ γ₂ _ h => ?_, fun δ δS =>
⟨p ≫ δ ≫ Groupoid.inv p, Sn.conj' p δS, ?_⟩⟩
· simpa only [inv_eq_inv, Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id,
IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc] using p ≫= h =≫ inv p
· simp only [inv_eq_inv, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id,
IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_normal.conjugation_bij CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsNormal.conjugation_bij
theorem top_isNormal : IsNormal (⊤ : Subgroupoid C) :=
{ wide := fun _ => trivial
conj := fun _ _ _ => trivial }
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.top_is_normal CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.top_isNormal
theorem sInf_isNormal (s : Set <| Subgroupoid C) (sn : ∀ S ∈ s, IsNormal S) : IsNormal (sInf s) :=
{ wide := by simp_rw [sInf, mem_iInter₂]; exact fun c S Ss => (sn S Ss).wide c
conj := by simp_rw [sInf, mem_iInter₂]; exact fun p γ hγ S Ss => (sn S Ss).conj p (hγ S Ss) }
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.Inf_is_normal CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.sInf_isNormal
theorem discrete_isNormal : (@discrete C _).IsNormal :=
{ wide := fun c => by constructor
conj := fun f γ hγ => by
cases hγ
simp only [inv_eq_inv, Category.id_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id]; constructor }
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.discrete_is_normal CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.discrete_isNormal
theorem IsNormal.vertexSubgroup (Sn : IsNormal S) (c : C) (cS : c ∈ S.objs) :
(S.vertexSubgroup cS).Normal where
conj_mem x hx y := by rw [mul_assoc]; exact Sn.conj' y hx
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_normal.vertex_subgroup CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.IsNormal.vertexSubgroup
section Hom
variable {D : Type*} [Groupoid D] (φ : C ⥤ D)
def comap (S : Subgroupoid D) : Subgroupoid C where
arrows c d := {f : c ⟶ d | φ.map f ∈ S.arrows (φ.obj c) (φ.obj d)}
inv hp := by rw [mem_setOf, inv_eq_inv, φ.map_inv, ← inv_eq_inv]; exact S.inv hp
mul := by
intros
simp only [mem_setOf, Functor.map_comp]
apply S.mul <;> assumption
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.comap CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.comap
theorem comap_mono (S T : Subgroupoid D) : S ≤ T → comap φ S ≤ comap φ T := fun ST _ =>
@ST ⟨_, _, _⟩
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.comap_mono CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.comap_mono
theorem isNormal_comap {S : Subgroupoid D} (Sn : IsNormal S) : IsNormal (comap φ S) where
wide c := by rw [comap, mem_setOf, Functor.map_id]; apply Sn.wide
conj f γ hγ := by
simp_rw [inv_eq_inv f, comap, mem_setOf, Functor.map_comp, Functor.map_inv, ← inv_eq_inv]
exact Sn.conj _ hγ
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.is_normal_comap CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.isNormal_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp {E : Type*} [Groupoid E] (ψ : D ⥤ E) : comap (φ ⋙ ψ) = comap φ ∘ comap ψ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.comap_comp CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.comap_comp
def ker : Subgroupoid C :=
comap φ discrete
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.ker CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.ker
theorem mem_ker_iff {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) :
f ∈ (ker φ).arrows c d ↔ ∃ h : φ.obj c = φ.obj d, φ.map f = eqToHom h :=
mem_discrete_iff (φ.map f)
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_ker_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_ker_iff
theorem ker_isNormal : (ker φ).IsNormal :=
isNormal_comap φ discrete_isNormal
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.ker_is_normal CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.ker_isNormal
@[simp]
theorem ker_comp {E : Type*} [Groupoid E] (ψ : D ⥤ E) : ker (φ ⋙ ψ) = comap φ (ker ψ) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.ker_comp CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.ker_comp
inductive Map.Arrows (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S : Subgroupoid C) : ∀ c d : D, (c ⟶ d) → Prop
| im {c d : C} (f : c ⟶ d) (hf : f ∈ S.arrows c d) : Map.Arrows hφ S (φ.obj c) (φ.obj d) (φ.map f)
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.map.arrows CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.Map.Arrows
theorem Map.arrows_iff (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S : Subgroupoid C) {c d : D} (f : c ⟶ d) :
Map.Arrows φ hφ S c d f ↔
∃ (a b : C) (g : a ⟶ b) (ha : φ.obj a = c) (hb : φ.obj b = d) (_hg : g ∈ S.arrows a b),
f = eqToHom ha.symm ≫ φ.map g ≫ eqToHom hb := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨g, hg⟩; exact ⟨_, _, g, rfl, rfl, hg, eq_conj_eqToHom _⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, g, rfl, rfl, hg, rfl⟩; rw [← eq_conj_eqToHom]; constructor; exact hg
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.map.arrows_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.Map.arrows_iff
def map (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S : Subgroupoid C) : Subgroupoid D where
arrows c d := {x | Map.Arrows φ hφ S c d x}
inv := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨⟩
rw [inv_eq_inv, ← Functor.map_inv, ← inv_eq_inv]
constructor; apply S.inv; assumption
mul := by
rintro _ _ _ _ ⟨f, hf⟩ q hq
obtain ⟨c₃, c₄, g, he, rfl, hg, gq⟩ := (Map.arrows_iff φ hφ S q).mp hq
cases hφ he; rw [gq, ← eq_conj_eqToHom, ← φ.map_comp]
constructor; exact S.mul hf hg
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.map CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.map
theorem mem_map_iff (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S : Subgroupoid C) {c d : D} (f : c ⟶ d) :
f ∈ (map φ hφ S).arrows c d ↔
∃ (a b : C) (g : a ⟶ b) (ha : φ.obj a = c) (hb : φ.obj b = d) (_hg : g ∈ S.arrows a b),
f = eqToHom ha.symm ≫ φ.map g ≫ eqToHom hb :=
Map.arrows_iff φ hφ S f
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.mem_map_iff CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.mem_map_iff
theorem galoisConnection_map_comap (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) :
GaloisConnection (map φ hφ) (comap φ) := by
rintro S T; simp_rw [le_iff]; constructor
· exact fun h c d f fS => h (Map.Arrows.im f fS)
· rintro h _ _ g ⟨a, gφS⟩
exact h gφS
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.galois_connection_map_comap CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.galoisConnection_map_comap
theorem map_mono (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S T : Subgroupoid C) :
S ≤ T → map φ hφ S ≤ map φ hφ T := fun h => (galoisConnection_map_comap φ hφ).monotone_l h
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.map_mono CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.map_mono
theorem le_comap_map (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S : Subgroupoid C) :
S ≤ comap φ (map φ hφ S) :=
(galoisConnection_map_comap φ hφ).le_u_l S
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.le_comap_map CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.le_comap_map
theorem map_comap_le (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (T : Subgroupoid D) :
map φ hφ (comap φ T) ≤ T :=
(galoisConnection_map_comap φ hφ).l_u_le T
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.map_comap_le CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.map_comap_le
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (S : Subgroupoid C)
(T : Subgroupoid D) : map φ hφ S ≤ T ↔ S ≤ comap φ T :=
(galoisConnection_map_comap φ hφ).le_iff_le
#align category_theory.subgroupoid.map_le_iff_le_comap CategoryTheory.Subgroupoid.map_le_iff_le_comap
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Groupoid/Subgroupoid.lean | 532 | 541 | theorem mem_map_objs_iff (hφ : Function.Injective φ.obj) (d : D) :
d ∈ (map φ hφ S).objs ↔ ∃ c ∈ S.objs, φ.obj c = d := by |
dsimp [objs, map]
constructor
· rintro ⟨f, hf⟩
change Map.Arrows φ hφ S d d f at hf; rw [Map.arrows_iff] at hf
obtain ⟨c, d, g, ec, ed, eg, gS, eg⟩ := hf
exact ⟨c, ⟨mem_objs_of_src S eg, ec⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, ⟨γ, γS⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨φ.map γ, ⟨γ, γS⟩⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
#align_import geometry.euclidean.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
open Set
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
variable [NormedAddTorsor V P]
noncomputable section
namespace AffineSubspace
variable {c c₁ c₂ p₁ p₂ : P}
def perpBisector (p₁ p₂ : P) : AffineSubspace ℝ P :=
.comap ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst ℝ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂)).symm : P →ᵃ[ℝ] V) <|
(LinearMap.ker (innerₛₗ ℝ (p₂ -ᵥ p₁))).toAffineSubspace
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero' :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪p₂ -ᵥ p₁, c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂⟫ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 :=
inner_eq_zero_symm
theorem mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_pointReflection_vsub_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ p₂ ↔ ⟪Equiv.pointReflection c p₁ -ᵥ p₂, p₂ -ᵥ p₁⟫ = 0 := by
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, Equiv.pointReflection_apply,
vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, ← smul_add, real_inner_smul_left, vadd_vsub_assoc]
simp
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/PerpBisector.lean | 59 | 63 | theorem mem_perpBisector_pointReflection_iff_inner_eq_zero :
c ∈ perpBisector p₁ (Equiv.pointReflection p₂ p₁) ↔ ⟪c -ᵥ p₂, p₁ -ᵥ p₂⟫ = 0 := by |
rw [mem_perpBisector_iff_inner_eq_zero, midpoint_pointReflection_right,
Equiv.pointReflection_apply, vadd_vsub_assoc, inner_add_right, add_self_eq_zero,
← neg_eq_zero, ← inner_neg_right, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical.Defs
#align_import algebra.order.field.canonical.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ee0c179cd3c8a45aa5bffbf1b41d8dbede452865"
variable {α : Type*}
section CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield
variable [CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Canonical/Basic.lean | 22 | 22 | theorem tsub_div (a b c : α) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c := by | simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, tsub_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.EventuallyConst
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.IterateMapComap
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OrzechProperty
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
#align_import ring_theory.noetherian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"210657c4ea4a4a7b234392f70a3a2a83346dfa90"
open Set Filter Pointwise
-- Porting note: should this be renamed to `Noetherian`?
class IsNoetherian (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] : Prop where
noetherian : ∀ s : Submodule R M, s.FG
#align is_noetherian IsNoetherian
attribute [inherit_doc IsNoetherian] IsNoetherian.noetherian
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R P]
open IsNoetherian
theorem isNoetherian_def : IsNoetherian R M ↔ ∀ s : Submodule R M, s.FG :=
⟨fun h => h.noetherian, IsNoetherian.mk⟩
#align is_noetherian_def isNoetherian_def
theorem isNoetherian_submodule {N : Submodule R M} :
IsNoetherian R N ↔ ∀ s : Submodule R M, s ≤ N → s.FG := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨hn⟩ => fun s hs =>
have : s ≤ LinearMap.range N.subtype := N.range_subtype.symm ▸ hs
Submodule.map_comap_eq_self this ▸ (hn _).map _,
fun h => ⟨fun s => ?_⟩⟩
have f := (Submodule.equivMapOfInjective N.subtype Subtype.val_injective s).symm
have h₁ := h (s.map N.subtype) (Submodule.map_subtype_le N s)
have h₂ : (⊤ : Submodule R (s.map N.subtype)).map f = ⊤ := by simp
have h₃ := ((Submodule.fg_top _).2 h₁).map (↑f : _ →ₗ[R] s)
exact (Submodule.fg_top _).1 (h₂ ▸ h₃)
#align is_noetherian_submodule isNoetherian_submodule
theorem isNoetherian_submodule_left {N : Submodule R M} :
IsNoetherian R N ↔ ∀ s : Submodule R M, (N ⊓ s).FG :=
isNoetherian_submodule.trans ⟨fun H _ => H _ inf_le_left, fun H _ hs => inf_of_le_right hs ▸ H _⟩
#align is_noetherian_submodule_left isNoetherian_submodule_left
theorem isNoetherian_submodule_right {N : Submodule R M} :
IsNoetherian R N ↔ ∀ s : Submodule R M, (s ⊓ N).FG :=
isNoetherian_submodule.trans ⟨fun H _ => H _ inf_le_right, fun H _ hs => inf_of_le_left hs ▸ H _⟩
#align is_noetherian_submodule_right isNoetherian_submodule_right
instance isNoetherian_submodule' [IsNoetherian R M] (N : Submodule R M) : IsNoetherian R N :=
isNoetherian_submodule.2 fun _ _ => IsNoetherian.noetherian _
#align is_noetherian_submodule' isNoetherian_submodule'
theorem isNoetherian_of_le {s t : Submodule R M} [ht : IsNoetherian R t] (h : s ≤ t) :
IsNoetherian R s :=
isNoetherian_submodule.mpr fun _ hs' => isNoetherian_submodule.mp ht _ (le_trans hs' h)
#align is_noetherian_of_le isNoetherian_of_le
variable (M)
theorem isNoetherian_of_surjective (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (hf : LinearMap.range f = ⊤) [IsNoetherian R M] :
IsNoetherian R P :=
⟨fun s =>
have : (s.comap f).map f = s := Submodule.map_comap_eq_self <| hf.symm ▸ le_top
this ▸ (noetherian _).map _⟩
#align is_noetherian_of_surjective isNoetherian_of_surjective
variable {M}
instance isNoetherian_quotient {R} [Ring R] {M} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
(N : Submodule R M) [IsNoetherian R M] : IsNoetherian R (M ⧸ N) :=
isNoetherian_of_surjective _ _ (LinearMap.range_eq_top.mpr N.mkQ_surjective)
#align submodule.quotient.is_noetherian isNoetherian_quotient
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-27"), nolint defLemma]
alias Submodule.Quotient.isNoetherian := isNoetherian_quotient
theorem isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv (f : M ≃ₗ[R] P) [IsNoetherian R M] : IsNoetherian R P :=
isNoetherian_of_surjective _ f.toLinearMap f.range
#align is_noetherian_of_linear_equiv isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv
theorem isNoetherian_top_iff : IsNoetherian R (⊤ : Submodule R M) ↔ IsNoetherian R M := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv (LinearEquiv.ofTop (⊤ : Submodule R M) rfl)
· exact isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv (LinearEquiv.ofTop (⊤ : Submodule R M) rfl).symm
#align is_noetherian_top_iff isNoetherian_top_iff
theorem isNoetherian_of_injective [IsNoetherian R P] (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
IsNoetherian R M :=
isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f hf).symm
#align is_noetherian_of_injective isNoetherian_of_injective
theorem fg_of_injective [IsNoetherian R P] {N : Submodule R M} (f : M →ₗ[R] P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : N.FG :=
haveI := isNoetherian_of_injective f hf
IsNoetherian.noetherian N
#align fg_of_injective fg_of_injective
end
section
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R P]
open IsNoetherian
theorem isNoetherian_of_ker_bot [IsNoetherian R P] (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) :
IsNoetherian R M :=
isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f <| LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mp hf).symm
#align is_noetherian_of_ker_bot isNoetherian_of_ker_bot
theorem fg_of_ker_bot [IsNoetherian R P] {N : Submodule R M} (f : M →ₗ[R] P)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) : N.FG :=
haveI := isNoetherian_of_ker_bot f hf
IsNoetherian.noetherian N
#align fg_of_ker_bot fg_of_ker_bot
instance isNoetherian_prod [IsNoetherian R M] [IsNoetherian R P] : IsNoetherian R (M × P) :=
⟨fun s =>
Submodule.fg_of_fg_map_of_fg_inf_ker (LinearMap.snd R M P) (noetherian _) <|
have : s ⊓ LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.snd R M P) ≤ LinearMap.range (LinearMap.inl R M P) :=
fun x ⟨_, hx2⟩ => ⟨x.1, Prod.ext rfl <| Eq.symm <| LinearMap.mem_ker.1 hx2⟩
Submodule.map_comap_eq_self this ▸ (noetherian _).map _⟩
#align is_noetherian_prod isNoetherian_prod
instance isNoetherian_pi {R ι : Type*} {M : ι → Type*}
[Ring R] [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)] [Finite ι]
[∀ i, IsNoetherian R (M i)] : IsNoetherian R (∀ i, M i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
suffices on_finset : ∀ s : Finset ι, IsNoetherian R (∀ i : s, M i) by
let coe_e := Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv <| @Finset.mem_univ ι _
letI : IsNoetherian R (∀ i : Finset.univ, M (coe_e i)) := on_finset Finset.univ
exact isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv (LinearEquiv.piCongrLeft R M coe_e)
intro s
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has ih
· exact ⟨fun s => by
have : s = ⊥ := by simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [this]
apply Submodule.fg_bot⟩
refine
@isNoetherian_of_linearEquiv R (M a × ((i : s) → M i)) _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ <|
@isNoetherian_prod R (M a) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih
refine
{ toFun := fun f i =>
(Finset.mem_insert.1 i.2).by_cases
(fun h : i.1 = a => show M i.1 from Eq.recOn h.symm f.1)
(fun h : i.1 ∈ s => show M i.1 from f.2 ⟨i.1, h⟩),
invFun := fun f =>
(f ⟨a, Finset.mem_insert_self _ _⟩, fun i => f ⟨i.1, Finset.mem_insert_of_mem i.2⟩),
map_add' := ?_,
map_smul' := ?_
left_inv := ?_,
right_inv := ?_ }
· intro f g
ext i
unfold Or.by_cases
cases' i with i hi
rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 hi with (rfl | h)
· change _ = _ + _
simp only [dif_pos]
rfl
· change _ = _ + _
have : ¬i = a := by
rintro rfl
exact has h
simp only [dif_neg this, dif_pos h]
rfl
· intro c f
ext i
unfold Or.by_cases
cases' i with i hi
rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 hi with (rfl | h)
· dsimp
simp only [dif_pos]
· dsimp
have : ¬i = a := by
rintro rfl
exact has h
simp only [dif_neg this, dif_pos h]
· intro f
apply Prod.ext
· simp only [Or.by_cases, dif_pos]
· ext ⟨i, his⟩
have : ¬i = a := by
rintro rfl
exact has his
simp only [Or.by_cases, this, not_false_iff, dif_neg]
· intro f
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 hi with (rfl | h)
· simp only [Or.by_cases, dif_pos]
· have : ¬i = a := by
rintro rfl
exact has h
simp only [Or.by_cases, dif_neg this, dif_pos h]
#align is_noetherian_pi isNoetherian_pi
instance isNoetherian_pi' {R ι M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Finite ι]
[IsNoetherian R M] : IsNoetherian R (ι → M) :=
isNoetherian_pi
#align is_noetherian_pi' isNoetherian_pi'
end
open IsNoetherian Submodule Function
section
universe w
variable {R M P : Type*} {N : Type w} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N]
[Module R N] [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P]
theorem isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded :
IsNoetherian R M ↔ WellFounded ((· > ·) : Submodule R M → Submodule R M → Prop) := by
have := (CompleteLattice.wellFounded_characterisations <| Submodule R M).out 0 3
-- Porting note: inlining this makes rw complain about it being a metavariable
rw [this]
exact
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => fun k => (fg_iff_compact k).mp (h k), fun h =>
⟨fun k => (fg_iff_compact k).mpr (h k)⟩⟩
#align is_noetherian_iff_well_founded isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded
theorem isNoetherian_iff_fg_wellFounded :
IsNoetherian R M ↔
WellFounded
((· > ·) : { N : Submodule R M // N.FG } → { N : Submodule R M // N.FG } → Prop) := by
let α := { N : Submodule R M // N.FG }
constructor
· intro H
let f : α ↪o Submodule R M := OrderEmbedding.subtype _
exact OrderEmbedding.wellFounded f.dual (isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp H)
· intro H
constructor
intro N
obtain ⟨⟨N₀, h₁⟩, e : N₀ ≤ N, h₂⟩ :=
WellFounded.has_min H { N' : α | N'.1 ≤ N } ⟨⟨⊥, Submodule.fg_bot⟩, @bot_le _ _ _ N⟩
convert h₁
refine (e.antisymm ?_).symm
by_contra h₃
obtain ⟨x, hx₁ : x ∈ N, hx₂ : x ∉ N₀⟩ := Set.not_subset.mp h₃
apply hx₂
rw [eq_of_le_of_not_lt (le_sup_right : N₀ ≤ _) (h₂
⟨_, Submodule.FG.sup ⟨{x}, by rw [Finset.coe_singleton]⟩ h₁⟩ <|
sup_le ((Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem _ _).mpr hx₁) e)]
exact (le_sup_left : (R ∙ x) ≤ _) (Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self _)
#align is_noetherian_iff_fg_well_founded isNoetherian_iff_fg_wellFounded
variable (R M)
theorem wellFounded_submodule_gt (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] :
∀ [IsNoetherian R M], WellFounded ((· > ·) : Submodule R M → Submodule R M → Prop) :=
isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp ‹_›
#align well_founded_submodule_gt wellFounded_submodule_gt
variable {R M}
theorem set_has_maximal_iff_noetherian :
(∀ a : Set <| Submodule R M, a.Nonempty → ∃ M' ∈ a, ∀ I ∈ a, ¬M' < I) ↔ IsNoetherian R M := by
rw [isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded, WellFounded.wellFounded_iff_has_min]
#align set_has_maximal_iff_noetherian set_has_maximal_iff_noetherian
theorem monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian :
(∀ f : ℕ →o Submodule R M, ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → f n = f m) ↔ IsNoetherian R M := by
rw [isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded, WellFounded.monotone_chain_condition]
#align monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian
theorem eventuallyConst_of_isNoetherian [IsNoetherian R M] (f : ℕ →o Submodule R M) :
atTop.EventuallyConst f := by
simp_rw [eventuallyConst_atTop, eq_comm]
exact (monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian.mpr inferInstance) f
theorem IsNoetherian.induction [IsNoetherian R M] {P : Submodule R M → Prop}
(hgt : ∀ I, (∀ J > I, P J) → P I) (I : Submodule R M) : P I :=
WellFounded.recursion (wellFounded_submodule_gt R M) I hgt
#align is_noetherian.induction IsNoetherian.induction
end
section
universe w
variable {R M P : Type*} {N : Type w} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup N]
[Module R N] [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P] [IsNoetherian R M]
lemma Submodule.finite_ne_bot_of_independent {ι : Type*} {N : ι → Submodule R M}
(h : CompleteLattice.Independent N) :
Set.Finite {i | N i ≠ ⊥} :=
CompleteLattice.WellFounded.finite_ne_bot_of_independent
(isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp inferInstance) h
theorem LinearIndependent.finite_of_isNoetherian [Nontrivial R] {ι} {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) : Finite ι := by
have hwf := isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.mp (by infer_instance : IsNoetherian R M)
refine CompleteLattice.WellFounded.finite_of_independent hwf hv.independent_span_singleton
fun i contra => ?_
apply hv.ne_zero i
have : v i ∈ R ∙ v i := Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self (v i)
rwa [contra, Submodule.mem_bot] at this
#align linear_independent.finite_of_is_noetherian LinearIndependent.finite_of_isNoetherian
theorem LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian [Nontrivial R] {s : Set M}
(hi : LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M)) : s.Finite :=
@Set.toFinite _ _ hi.finite_of_isNoetherian
#align linear_independent.set_finite_of_is_noetherian LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian
@[deprecated]
alias finite_of_linearIndependent := LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian
#align finite_of_linear_independent LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian
theorem isNoetherian_of_range_eq_ker [IsNoetherian R P]
(f : M →ₗ[R] N) (g : N →ₗ[R] P) (h : LinearMap.range f = LinearMap.ker g) :
IsNoetherian R N :=
isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded.2 <|
wellFounded_gt_exact_sequence
(wellFounded_submodule_gt R _) (wellFounded_submodule_gt R _)
(LinearMap.range f)
(Submodule.map (f.ker.liftQ f <| le_rfl))
(Submodule.comap (f.ker.liftQ f <| le_rfl))
(Submodule.comap g.rangeRestrict) (Submodule.map g.rangeRestrict)
(Submodule.gciMapComap <| LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mp <|
Submodule.ker_liftQ_eq_bot _ _ _ (le_refl _))
(Submodule.giMapComap g.surjective_rangeRestrict)
(by simp [Submodule.map_comap_eq, inf_comm, Submodule.range_liftQ])
(by simp [Submodule.comap_map_eq, h])
#align is_noetherian_of_range_eq_ker isNoetherian_of_range_eq_ker
theorem LinearMap.eventually_disjoint_ker_pow_range_pow (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
∀ᶠ n in atTop, Disjoint (LinearMap.ker (f ^ n)) (LinearMap.range (f ^ n)) := by
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → LinearMap.ker (f ^ n) = LinearMap.ker (f ^ m)⟩ :=
monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian.mpr inferInstance f.iterateKer
refine eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun m hm ↦ disjoint_iff.mpr ?_⟩
rw [← hn _ hm, Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
rintro - ⟨hx, ⟨x, rfl⟩⟩
apply LinearMap.pow_map_zero_of_le hm
replace hx : x ∈ LinearMap.ker (f ^ (n + m)) := by
simpa [f.pow_apply n, f.pow_apply m, ← f.pow_apply (n + m), ← iterate_add_apply] using hx
rwa [← hn _ (n.le_add_right m)] at hx
#align is_noetherian.exists_endomorphism_iterate_ker_inf_range_eq_bot LinearMap.eventually_disjoint_ker_pow_range_pow
lemma LinearMap.eventually_iSup_ker_pow_eq (f : M →ₗ[R] M) :
∀ᶠ n in atTop, ⨆ m, LinearMap.ker (f ^ m) = LinearMap.ker (f ^ n) := by
obtain ⟨n, hn : ∀ m, n ≤ m → ker (f ^ n) = ker (f ^ m)⟩ :=
monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian.mpr inferInstance f.iterateKer
refine eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨n, fun m hm ↦ ?_⟩
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun l ↦ ?_) (le_iSup (fun i ↦ LinearMap.ker (f ^ i)) m)
rcases le_or_lt m l with h | h
· rw [← hn _ (hm.trans h), hn _ hm]
· exact f.iterateKer.monotone h.le
theorem IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_of_injective (i f : N →ₗ[R] M)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : Surjective f) : Injective f := by
haveI := isNoetherian_of_injective i hi
obtain ⟨n, H⟩ := monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian.2 ‹_›
⟨_, monotone_nat_of_le_succ <| f.iterateMapComap_le_succ i ⊥ (by simp)⟩
exact LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.1 <| bot_unique <|
f.ker_le_of_iterateMapComap_eq_succ i ⊥ n (H _ (Nat.le_succ _)) hf hi
theorem IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_of_submodule
{N : Submodule R M} (f : N →ₗ[R] M) (hf : Surjective f) : Injective f :=
IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_of_injective N.subtype f N.injective_subtype hf
theorem IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_endomorphism (f : M →ₗ[R] M)
(s : Surjective f) : Injective f :=
IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_of_injective _ f (LinearEquiv.refl _ _).injective s
#align is_noetherian.injective_of_surjective_endomorphism IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_endomorphism
theorem IsNoetherian.bijective_of_surjective_endomorphism (f : M →ₗ[R] M)
(s : Surjective f) : Bijective f :=
⟨IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_endomorphism f s, s⟩
#align is_noetherian.bijective_of_surjective_endomorphism IsNoetherian.bijective_of_surjective_endomorphism
theorem IsNoetherian.disjoint_partialSups_eventually_bot
(f : ℕ → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ n, Disjoint (partialSups f n) (f (n + 1))) :
∃ n : ℕ, ∀ m, n ≤ m → f m = ⊥ := by
-- A little off-by-one cleanup first:
suffices t : ∃ n : ℕ, ∀ m, n ≤ m → f (m + 1) = ⊥ by
obtain ⟨n, w⟩ := t
use n + 1
rintro (_ | m) p
· cases p
· apply w
exact Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp p
obtain ⟨n, w⟩ := monotone_stabilizes_iff_noetherian.mpr inferInstance (partialSups f)
exact
⟨n, fun m p =>
(h m).eq_bot_of_ge <| sup_eq_left.1 <| (w (m + 1) <| le_add_right p).symm.trans <| w m p⟩
#align is_noetherian.disjoint_partial_sups_eventually_bot IsNoetherian.disjoint_partialSups_eventually_bot
theorem IsNoetherian.subsingleton_of_prod_injective (f : M × N →ₗ[R] M)
(i : Injective f) : Subsingleton N := .intro fun x y ↦ by
have h := IsNoetherian.injective_of_surjective_of_injective f _ i LinearMap.fst_surjective
simpa using h (show LinearMap.fst R M N (0, x) = LinearMap.fst R M N (0, y) from rfl)
@[simps!]
def IsNoetherian.equivPUnitOfProdInjective (f : M × N →ₗ[R] M)
(i : Injective f) : N ≃ₗ[R] PUnit.{w + 1} :=
haveI := IsNoetherian.subsingleton_of_prod_injective f i
.ofSubsingleton _ _
#align is_noetherian.equiv_punit_of_prod_injective IsNoetherian.equivPUnitOfProdInjective
end
abbrev IsNoetherianRing (R) [Semiring R] :=
IsNoetherian R R
#align is_noetherian_ring IsNoetherianRing
theorem isNoetherianRing_iff {R} [Semiring R] : IsNoetherianRing R ↔ IsNoetherian R R :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_noetherian_ring_iff isNoetherianRing_iff
theorem isNoetherianRing_iff_ideal_fg (R : Type*) [Semiring R] :
IsNoetherianRing R ↔ ∀ I : Ideal R, I.FG :=
isNoetherianRing_iff.trans isNoetherian_def
#align is_noetherian_ring_iff_ideal_fg isNoetherianRing_iff_ideal_fg
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 80) isNoetherian_of_finite (R M) [Finite M] [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] : IsNoetherian R M :=
⟨fun s => ⟨(s : Set M).toFinite.toFinset, by rw [Set.Finite.coe_toFinset, Submodule.span_eq]⟩⟩
#align is_noetherian_of_finite isNoetherian_of_finite
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) isNoetherian_of_subsingleton (R M) [Subsingleton R] [Semiring R]
[AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] : IsNoetherian R M :=
haveI := Module.subsingleton R M
isNoetherian_of_finite R M
#align is_noetherian_of_subsingleton isNoetherian_of_subsingleton
theorem isNoetherian_of_submodule_of_noetherian (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
(N : Submodule R M) (h : IsNoetherian R M) : IsNoetherian R N := by
rw [isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded] at h ⊢
exact OrderEmbedding.wellFounded (Submodule.MapSubtype.orderEmbedding N).dual h
#align is_noetherian_of_submodule_of_noetherian isNoetherian_of_submodule_of_noetherian
theorem isNoetherian_of_tower (R) {S M} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [SMul R S]
[Module S M] [Module R M] [IsScalarTower R S M] (h : IsNoetherian R M) : IsNoetherian S M := by
rw [isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded] at h ⊢
exact (Submodule.restrictScalarsEmbedding R S M).dual.wellFounded h
#align is_noetherian_of_tower isNoetherian_of_tower
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Noetherian.lean | 576 | 608 | theorem isNoetherian_of_fg_of_noetherian {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
(N : Submodule R M) [I : IsNoetherianRing R] (hN : N.FG) : IsNoetherian R N := by |
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := hN
haveI := Classical.decEq M
haveI := Classical.decEq R
have : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∈ N := fun x hx => hs ▸ Submodule.subset_span hx
refine
@isNoetherian_of_surjective
R ((↑s : Set M) → R) N _ _ _ (Pi.module _ _ _) _ ?_ ?_ isNoetherian_pi
· fapply LinearMap.mk
· fapply AddHom.mk
· exact fun f => ⟨∑ i ∈ s.attach, f i • i.1, N.sum_mem fun c _ => N.smul_mem _ <| this _ c.2⟩
· intro f g
apply Subtype.eq
change (∑ i ∈ s.attach, (f i + g i) • _) = _
simp only [add_smul, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
rfl
· intro c f
apply Subtype.eq
change (∑ i ∈ s.attach, (c • f i) • _) = _
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_smul]
exact Finset.smul_sum.symm
· rw [LinearMap.range_eq_top]
rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
change n ∈ N at hn
rw [← hs, ← Set.image_id (s : Set M), Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at hn
rcases hn with ⟨l, hl1, hl2⟩
refine ⟨fun x => l x, Subtype.ext ?_⟩
change (∑ i ∈ s.attach, l i • (i : M)) = n
rw [s.sum_attach fun i ↦ l i • i, ← hl2,
Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum, eq_comm]
refine Finset.sum_subset hl1 fun x _ hx => ?_
rw [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.1 hx, zero_smul]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Indicator
#align_import algebra.big_operators.finsupp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"842328d9df7e96fd90fc424e115679c15fb23a71"
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α ι γ A B C : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] [AddCommMonoid B] [AddCommMonoid C]
variable {t : ι → A → C} (h0 : ∀ i, t i 0 = 0) (h1 : ∀ i x y, t i (x + y) = t i x + t i y)
variable {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι →₀ A} (i : ι)
variable (g : ι →₀ A) (k : ι → A → γ → B) (x : γ)
variable {β M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
section SumProd
@[to_additive "`sum f g` is the sum of `g a (f a)` over the support of `f`. "]
def prod [Zero M] [CommMonoid N] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) : N :=
∏ a ∈ f.support, g a (f a)
#align finsupp.prod Finsupp.prod
#align finsupp.sum Finsupp.sum
variable [Zero M] [Zero M'] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_support_subset (f : α →₀ M) {s : Finset α} (hs : f.support ⊆ s) (g : α → M → N)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i 0 = 1) : f.prod g = ∏ x ∈ s, g x (f x) := by
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x hxs hx => h x hxs ▸ (congr_arg (g x) ?_)
exact not_mem_support_iff.1 hx
#align finsupp.prod_of_support_subset Finsupp.prod_of_support_subset
#align finsupp.sum_of_support_subset Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → N) (h : ∀ i, g i 0 = 1) :
f.prod g = ∏ i, g i (f i) :=
f.prod_of_support_subset (subset_univ _) g fun x _ => h x
#align finsupp.prod_fintype Finsupp.prod_fintype
#align finsupp.sum_fintype Finsupp.sum_fintype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_single_index {a : α} {b : M} {h : α → M → N} (h_zero : h a 0 = 1) :
(single a b).prod h = h a b :=
calc
(single a b).prod h = ∏ x ∈ {a}, h x (single a b x) :=
prod_of_support_subset _ support_single_subset h fun x hx =>
(mem_singleton.1 hx).symm ▸ h_zero
_ = h a b := by simp
#align finsupp.prod_single_index Finsupp.prod_single_index
#align finsupp.sum_single_index Finsupp.sum_single_index
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mapRange_index {f : M → M'} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {h : α → M' → N}
(h0 : ∀ a, h a 0 = 1) : (mapRange f hf g).prod h = g.prod fun a b => h a (f b) :=
Finset.prod_subset support_mapRange fun _ _ H => by rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 H, h0]
#align finsupp.prod_map_range_index Finsupp.prod_mapRange_index
#align finsupp.sum_map_range_index Finsupp.sum_mapRange_index
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_zero_index {h : α → M → N} : (0 : α →₀ M).prod h = 1 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.prod_zero_index Finsupp.prod_zero_index
#align finsupp.sum_zero_index Finsupp.sum_zero_index
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm (f : α →₀ M) (g : β →₀ M') (h : α → M → β → M' → N) :
(f.prod fun x v => g.prod fun x' v' => h x v x' v') =
g.prod fun x' v' => f.prod fun x v => h x v x' v' :=
Finset.prod_comm
#align finsupp.prod_comm Finsupp.prod_comm
#align finsupp.sum_comm Finsupp.sum_comm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_eq [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : α → M → N) :
(f.prod fun x v => ite (a = x) (b x v) 1) = ite (a ∈ f.support) (b a (f a)) 1 := by
dsimp [Finsupp.prod]
rw [f.support.prod_ite_eq]
#align finsupp.prod_ite_eq Finsupp.prod_ite_eq
#align finsupp.sum_ite_eq Finsupp.sum_ite_eq
-- @[simp]
theorem sum_ite_self_eq [DecidableEq α] {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α →₀ N) (a : α) :
(f.sum fun x v => ite (a = x) v 0) = f a := by
classical
convert f.sum_ite_eq a fun _ => id
simp [ite_eq_right_iff.2 Eq.symm]
#align finsupp.sum_ite_self_eq Finsupp.sum_ite_self_eq
-- Porting note: Added this thm to replace the simp in the previous one. Need to add [DecidableEq N]
@[simp]
theorem sum_ite_self_eq_aux [DecidableEq α] {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α →₀ N) (a : α) :
(if a ∈ f.support then f a else 0) = f a := by
simp only [mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_eq_left_iff, not_not]
exact fun h ↦ h.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A restatement of `sum_ite_eq` with the equality test reversed."]
theorem prod_ite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : α → M → N) :
(f.prod fun x v => ite (x = a) (b x v) 1) = ite (a ∈ f.support) (b a (f a)) 1 := by
dsimp [Finsupp.prod]
rw [f.support.prod_ite_eq']
#align finsupp.prod_ite_eq' Finsupp.prod_ite_eq'
#align finsupp.sum_ite_eq' Finsupp.sum_ite_eq'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem sum_ite_self_eq' [DecidableEq α] {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] (f : α →₀ N) (a : α) :
(f.sum fun x v => ite (x = a) v 0) = f a := by
classical
convert f.sum_ite_eq' a fun _ => id
simp [ite_eq_right_iff.2 Eq.symm]
#align finsupp.sum_ite_self_eq' Finsupp.sum_ite_self_eq'
@[simp]
theorem prod_pow [Fintype α] (f : α →₀ ℕ) (g : α → N) :
(f.prod fun a b => g a ^ b) = ∏ a, g a ^ f a :=
f.prod_fintype _ fun _ ↦ pow_zero _
#align finsupp.prod_pow Finsupp.prod_pow
@[to_additive
"If `g` maps a second argument of 0 to 0, summing it over the
result of `onFinset` is the same as summing it over the original `Finset`."]
theorem onFinset_prod {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {g : α → M → N} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s)
(hg : ∀ a, g a 0 = 1) : (onFinset s f hf).prod g = ∏ a ∈ s, g a (f a) :=
Finset.prod_subset support_onFinset_subset <| by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [*]
#align finsupp.on_finset_prod Finsupp.onFinset_prod
#align finsupp.on_finset_sum Finsupp.onFinset_sum
@[to_additive
" Taking a sum over `f : α →₀ M` is the same as adding the value on a
single element `y ∈ f.support` to the sum over `erase y f`. "]
theorem mul_prod_erase (f : α →₀ M) (y : α) (g : α → M → N) (hyf : y ∈ f.support) :
g y (f y) * (erase y f).prod g = f.prod g := by
classical
rw [Finsupp.prod, Finsupp.prod, ← Finset.mul_prod_erase _ _ hyf, Finsupp.support_erase,
Finset.prod_congr rfl]
intro h hx
rw [Finsupp.erase_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx)]
#align finsupp.mul_prod_erase Finsupp.mul_prod_erase
#align finsupp.add_sum_erase Finsupp.add_sum_erase
@[to_additive
" Generalization of `Finsupp.add_sum_erase`: if `g` maps a second argument of 0
to 0, then its sum over `f : α →₀ M` is the same as adding the value on any element
`y : α` to the sum over `erase y f`. "]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finsupp.lean | 186 | 191 | theorem mul_prod_erase' (f : α →₀ M) (y : α) (g : α → M → N) (hg : ∀ i : α, g i 0 = 1) :
g y (f y) * (erase y f).prod g = f.prod g := by |
classical
by_cases hyf : y ∈ f.support
· exact Finsupp.mul_prod_erase f y g hyf
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp hyf, hg y, erase_of_not_mem_support hyf, one_mul]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
#align_import topology.metric_space.infsep from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5316314b553dcf8c6716541851517c1a9715e22b"
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
#align set.einfsep Set.einfsep
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
#align set.le_einfsep_iff Set.le_einfsep_iff
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_zero Set.einfsep_zero
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
#align set.einfsep_pos Set.einfsep_pos
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 64 | 66 | theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by |
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LocalExtr
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IntermediateValue
import Mathlib.Topology.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
#align_import topology.algebra.order.compact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3efd324a3a31eaa40c9d5bfc669c4fafee5f9423"
open Filter OrderDual TopologicalSpace Function Set
open scoped Filter Topology
class CompactIccSpace (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
isCompact_Icc : ∀ {a b : α}, IsCompact (Icc a b)
#align compact_Icc_space CompactIccSpace
export CompactIccSpace (isCompact_Icc)
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: make it the definition
lemma CompactIccSpace.mk' [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α]
(h : ∀ {a b : α}, a ≤ b → IsCompact (Icc a b)) : CompactIccSpace α where
isCompact_Icc {a b} := by_cases h fun hab => by rw [Icc_eq_empty hab]; exact isCompact_empty
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: drop one `'`
lemma CompactIccSpace.mk'' [TopologicalSpace α] [PartialOrder α]
(h : ∀ {a b : α}, a < b → IsCompact (Icc a b)) : CompactIccSpace α :=
.mk' fun hab => hab.eq_or_lt.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [CompactIccSpace α] : CompactIccSpace (αᵒᵈ) where
isCompact_Icc := by
intro a b
convert isCompact_Icc (α := α) (a := b) (b := a) using 1
exact dual_Icc (α := α)
instance (priority := 100) ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toCompactIccSpace (α : Type*)
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] :
CompactIccSpace α := by
refine .mk'' fun {a b} hlt => ?_
rcases le_or_lt a b with hab | hab
swap
· simp [hab]
refine isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds.2 fun f hf => ?_
contrapose! hf
rw [le_principal_iff]
have hpt : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, {x} ∉ f := fun x hx hxf =>
hf x hx ((le_pure_iff.2 hxf).trans (pure_le_nhds x))
set s := { x ∈ Icc a b | Icc a x ∉ f }
have hsb : b ∈ upperBounds s := fun x hx => hx.1.2
have sbd : BddAbove s := ⟨b, hsb⟩
have ha : a ∈ s := by simp [s, hpt, hab]
rcases hab.eq_or_lt with (rfl | _hlt)
· exact ha.2
-- Porting note: the `obtain` below was instead
-- `set c := Sup s`
-- `have hsc : IsLUB s c := isLUB_csSup ⟨a, ha⟩ sbd`
obtain ⟨c, hsc⟩ : ∃ c, IsLUB s c := ⟨sSup s, isLUB_csSup ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hsb⟩⟩
have hc : c ∈ Icc a b := ⟨hsc.1 ha, hsc.2 hsb⟩
specialize hf c hc
have hcs : c ∈ s := by
rcases hc.1.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt); · assumption
refine ⟨hc, fun hcf => hf fun U hU => ?_⟩
rcases (mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' hlt).1 (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds hU)
with ⟨x, hxc, hxU⟩
rcases ((hsc.frequently_mem ⟨a, ha⟩).and_eventually
(Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic ⟨hxc, le_rfl⟩)).exists with ⟨y, ⟨_hyab, hyf⟩, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset (f.diff_mem_iff.2 ⟨hcf, hyf⟩) (Subset.trans ?_ hxU)
rw [diff_subset_iff]
exact Subset.trans Icc_subset_Icc_union_Ioc <| union_subset_union Subset.rfl <|
Ioc_subset_Ioc_left hy.1.le
rcases hc.2.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· exact hcs.2
exfalso
refine hf fun U hU => ?_
rcases (mem_nhdsWithin_Ici_iff_exists_mem_Ioc_Ico_subset hlt).1
(mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds hU) with
⟨y, hxy, hyU⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ hyU; clear! U
have hy : y ∈ Icc a b := ⟨hc.1.trans hxy.1.le, hxy.2⟩
by_cases hay : Icc a y ∈ f
· refine mem_of_superset (f.diff_mem_iff.2 ⟨f.diff_mem_iff.2 ⟨hay, hcs.2⟩, hpt y hy⟩) ?_
rw [diff_subset_iff, union_comm, Ico_union_right hxy.1.le, diff_subset_iff]
exact Icc_subset_Icc_union_Icc
· exact ((hsc.1 ⟨hy, hay⟩).not_lt hxy.1).elim
#align conditionally_complete_linear_order.to_compact_Icc_space ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toCompactIccSpace
instance {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, CompactIccSpace (α i)] : CompactIccSpace (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun {a b} => (pi_univ_Icc a b ▸ isCompact_univ_pi) fun _ => isCompact_Icc⟩
instance Pi.compact_Icc_space' {α β : Type*} [Preorder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[CompactIccSpace β] : CompactIccSpace (α → β) :=
inferInstance
#align pi.compact_Icc_space' Pi.compact_Icc_space'
instance {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [CompactIccSpace α] [Preorder β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [CompactIccSpace β] : CompactIccSpace (α × β) :=
⟨fun {a b} => (Icc_prod_eq a b).symm ▸ isCompact_Icc.prod isCompact_Icc⟩
theorem isCompact_uIcc {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [CompactIccSpace α]
{a b : α} : IsCompact (uIcc a b) :=
isCompact_Icc
#align is_compact_uIcc isCompact_uIcc
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) compactSpace_of_completeLinearOrder {α : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] : CompactSpace α :=
⟨by simp only [← Icc_bot_top, isCompact_Icc]⟩
#align compact_space_of_complete_linear_order compactSpace_of_completeLinearOrder
section
variable {α : Type*} [Preorder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [CompactIccSpace α]
instance compactSpace_Icc (a b : α) : CompactSpace (Icc a b) :=
isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp isCompact_Icc
#align compact_space_Icc compactSpace_Icc
end
section LinearOrder
variable {α β γ : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
theorem IsCompact.exists_isLeast [ClosedIicTopology α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(ne_s : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x, IsLeast s x := by
haveI : Nonempty s := ne_s.to_subtype
suffices (s ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, Iic x).Nonempty from
⟨this.choose, this.choose_spec.1, mem_iInter₂.mp this.choose_spec.2⟩
rw [biInter_eq_iInter]
by_contra H
rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at H
rcases hs.elim_directed_family_closed (fun x : s => Iic ↑x) (fun x => isClosed_Iic) H
(Monotone.directed_ge fun _ _ h => Iic_subset_Iic.mpr h) with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mpr hx ⟨x, x.2, le_rfl⟩
#align is_compact.exists_is_least IsCompact.exists_isLeast
theorem IsCompact.exists_isGreatest [ClosedIciTopology α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(ne_s : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x, IsGreatest s x :=
IsCompact.exists_isLeast (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ne_s
#align is_compact.exists_is_greatest IsCompact.exists_isGreatest
theorem IsCompact.exists_isGLB [ClosedIicTopology α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(ne_s : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, IsGLB s x :=
(hs.exists_isLeast ne_s).imp (fun x (hx : IsLeast s x) => ⟨hx.1, hx.isGLB⟩)
#align is_compact.exists_is_glb IsCompact.exists_isGLB
theorem IsCompact.exists_isLUB [ClosedIciTopology α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
(ne_s : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, IsLUB s x :=
IsCompact.exists_isGLB (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ne_s
#align is_compact.exists_is_lub IsCompact.exists_isLUB
theorem cocompact_le_atBot_atTop [CompactIccSpace α] :
cocompact α ≤ atBot ⊔ atTop := by
refine fun s hs ↦ mem_cocompact.mpr <| (isEmpty_or_nonempty α).casesOn ?_ ?_ <;> intro
· exact ⟨∅, isCompact_empty, fun x _ ↦ (IsEmpty.false x).elim⟩
· obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hs.1
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := mem_atTop_sets.mp hs.2
refine ⟨Icc t u, isCompact_Icc, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
exact (not_and_or.mp hx).casesOn (fun h ↦ ht x (le_of_not_le h)) fun h ↦ hu x (le_of_not_le h)
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Compact.lean | 215 | 221 | theorem cocompact_le_atBot [OrderTop α] [CompactIccSpace α] :
cocompact α ≤ atBot := by |
refine fun _ hs ↦ mem_cocompact.mpr <| (isEmpty_or_nonempty α).casesOn ?_ ?_ <;> intro
· exact ⟨∅, isCompact_empty, fun x _ ↦ (IsEmpty.false x).elim⟩
· obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hs
refine ⟨Icc t ⊤, isCompact_Icc, fun _ hx ↦ ?_⟩
exact (not_and_or.mp hx).casesOn (fun h ↦ ht _ (le_of_not_le h)) (fun h ↦ (h le_top).elim)
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 462 | 462 | theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by | simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
#align_import measure_theory.measure.content from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
open Set TopologicalSpace
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {G : Type w} [TopologicalSpace G]
structure Content (G : Type w) [TopologicalSpace G] where
toFun : Compacts G → ℝ≥0
mono' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂ → toFun K₁ ≤ toFun K₂
sup_disjoint' :
∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂ → IsClosed (K₁ : Set G) → IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)
→ toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
sup_le' : ∀ K₁ K₂ : Compacts G, toFun (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ toFun K₁ + toFun K₂
#align measure_theory.content MeasureTheory.Content
instance : Inhabited (Content G) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
mono' := by simp
sup_disjoint' := by simp
sup_le' := by simp }⟩
instance : CoeFun (Content G) fun _ => Compacts G → ℝ≥0∞ :=
⟨fun μ s => μ.toFun s⟩
namespace Content
variable (μ : Content G)
theorem apply_eq_coe_toFun (K : Compacts G) : μ K = μ.toFun K :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.content.apply_eq_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Content.apply_eq_coe_toFun
theorem mono (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) : μ K₁ ≤ μ K₂ := by
simp [apply_eq_coe_toFun, μ.mono' _ _ h]
#align measure_theory.content.mono MeasureTheory.Content.mono
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Content.lean | 102 | 105 | theorem sup_disjoint (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) (h : Disjoint (K₁ : Set G) K₂)
(h₁ : IsClosed (K₁ : Set G)) (h₂ : IsClosed (K₂ : Set G)) :
μ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = μ K₁ + μ K₂ := by |
simp [apply_eq_coe_toFun, μ.sup_disjoint' _ _ h]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Prod
#align_import order.filter.n_ary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"78f647f8517f021d839a7553d5dc97e79b508dea"
open Function Set
open Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' : Type*} {m : α → β → γ} {f f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
{g g₁ g₂ : Filter β} {h h₁ h₂ : Filter γ} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {u : Set γ}
{v : Set δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ}
def map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : Filter γ :=
((f ×ˢ g).map (uncurry m)).copy { s | ∃ u ∈ f, ∃ v ∈ g, image2 m u v ⊆ s } fun _ ↦ by
simp only [mem_map, mem_prod_iff, image2_subset_iff, prod_subset_iff]; rfl
#align filter.map₂ Filter.map₂
@[simp 900]
theorem mem_map₂_iff : u ∈ map₂ m f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, image2 m s t ⊆ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_map₂_iff Filter.mem_map₂_iff
theorem image2_mem_map₂ (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : image2 m s t ∈ map₂ m f g :=
⟨_, hs, _, ht, Subset.rfl⟩
#align filter.image2_mem_map₂ Filter.image2_mem_map₂
theorem map_prod_eq_map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.map (fun p : α × β => m p.1 p.2) (f ×ˢ g) = map₂ m f g := by
rw [map₂, copy_eq, uncurry_def]
#align filter.map_prod_eq_map₂ Filter.map_prod_eq_map₂
theorem map_prod_eq_map₂' (m : α × β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
Filter.map m (f ×ˢ g) = map₂ (fun a b => m (a, b)) f g :=
map_prod_eq_map₂ (curry m) f g
#align filter.map_prod_eq_map₂' Filter.map_prod_eq_map₂'
@[simp]
theorem map₂_mk_eq_prod (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) : map₂ Prod.mk f g = f ×ˢ g := by
simp only [← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_id']
#align filter.map₂_mk_eq_prod Filter.map₂_mk_eq_prod
-- lemma image2_mem_map₂_iff (hm : injective2 m) : image2 m s t ∈ map₂ m f g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ g :=
-- ⟨by { rintro ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h⟩, rw image2_subset_image2_iff hm at h,
-- exact ⟨mem_of_superset hu h.1, mem_of_superset hv h.2⟩ }, λ h, image2_mem_map₂ h.1 h.2⟩
theorem map₂_mono (hf : f₁ ≤ f₂) (hg : g₁ ≤ g₂) : map₂ m f₁ g₁ ≤ map₂ m f₂ g₂ :=
fun _ ⟨s, hs, t, ht, hst⟩ => ⟨s, hf hs, t, hg ht, hst⟩
#align filter.map₂_mono Filter.map₂_mono
theorem map₂_mono_left (h : g₁ ≤ g₂) : map₂ m f g₁ ≤ map₂ m f g₂ :=
map₂_mono Subset.rfl h
#align filter.map₂_mono_left Filter.map₂_mono_left
theorem map₂_mono_right (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : map₂ m f₁ g ≤ map₂ m f₂ g :=
map₂_mono h Subset.rfl
#align filter.map₂_mono_right Filter.map₂_mono_right
@[simp]
theorem le_map₂_iff {h : Filter γ} :
h ≤ map₂ m f g ↔ ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ f → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ g → image2 m s t ∈ h :=
⟨fun H _ hs _ ht => H <| image2_mem_map₂ hs ht, fun H _ ⟨_, hs, _, ht, hu⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (H hs ht) hu⟩
#align filter.le_map₂_iff Filter.le_map₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem map₂_eq_bot_iff : map₂ m f g = ⊥ ↔ f = ⊥ ∨ g = ⊥ := by simp [← map_prod_eq_map₂]
#align filter.map₂_eq_bot_iff Filter.map₂_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_left : map₂ m ⊥ g = ⊥ := map₂_eq_bot_iff.2 <| .inl rfl
#align filter.map₂_bot_left Filter.map₂_bot_left
@[simp]
theorem map₂_bot_right : map₂ m f ⊥ = ⊥ := map₂_eq_bot_iff.2 <| .inr rfl
#align filter.map₂_bot_right Filter.map₂_bot_right
@[simp]
theorem map₂_neBot_iff : (map₂ m f g).NeBot ↔ f.NeBot ∧ g.NeBot := by simp [neBot_iff, not_or]
#align filter.map₂_ne_bot_iff Filter.map₂_neBot_iff
protected theorem NeBot.map₂ (hf : f.NeBot) (hg : g.NeBot) : (map₂ m f g).NeBot :=
map₂_neBot_iff.2 ⟨hf, hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.map₂ Filter.NeBot.map₂
instance map₂.neBot [NeBot f] [NeBot g] : NeBot (map₂ m f g) := .map₂ ‹_› ‹_›
theorem NeBot.of_map₂_left (h : (map₂ m f g).NeBot) : f.NeBot :=
(map₂_neBot_iff.1 h).1
#align filter.ne_bot.of_map₂_left Filter.NeBot.of_map₂_left
theorem NeBot.of_map₂_right (h : (map₂ m f g).NeBot) : g.NeBot :=
(map₂_neBot_iff.1 h).2
#align filter.ne_bot.of_map₂_right Filter.NeBot.of_map₂_right
theorem map₂_sup_left : map₂ m (f₁ ⊔ f₂) g = map₂ m f₁ g ⊔ map₂ m f₂ g := by
simp_rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, sup_prod, map_sup]
#align filter.map₂_sup_left Filter.map₂_sup_left
theorem map₂_sup_right : map₂ m f (g₁ ⊔ g₂) = map₂ m f g₁ ⊔ map₂ m f g₂ := by
simp_rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, prod_sup, map_sup]
#align filter.map₂_sup_right Filter.map₂_sup_right
theorem map₂_inf_subset_left : map₂ m (f₁ ⊓ f₂) g ≤ map₂ m f₁ g ⊓ map₂ m f₂ g :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ map₂_mono_right) f₁ f₂
#align filter.map₂_inf_subset_left Filter.map₂_inf_subset_left
theorem map₂_inf_subset_right : map₂ m f (g₁ ⊓ g₂) ≤ map₂ m f g₁ ⊓ map₂ m f g₂ :=
Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ map₂_mono_left) g₁ g₂
#align filter.map₂_inf_subset_right Filter.map₂_inf_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem map₂_pure_left : map₂ m (pure a) g = g.map (m a) := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, pure_prod, map_map]; rfl
#align filter.map₂_pure_left Filter.map₂_pure_left
@[simp]
theorem map₂_pure_right : map₂ m f (pure b) = f.map (m · b) := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, prod_pure, map_map]; rfl
#align filter.map₂_pure_right Filter.map₂_pure_right
theorem map₂_pure : map₂ m (pure a) (pure b) = pure (m a b) := by rw [map₂_pure_right, map_pure]
#align filter.map₂_pure Filter.map₂_pure
theorem map₂_swap (m : α → β → γ) (f : Filter α) (g : Filter β) :
map₂ m f g = map₂ (fun a b => m b a) g f := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, prod_comm, map_map, ← map_prod_eq_map₂, Function.comp_def]
#align filter.map₂_swap Filter.map₂_swap
@[simp]
theorem map₂_left [NeBot g] : map₂ (fun x _ => x) f g = f := by
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_fst_prod]
#align filter.map₂_left Filter.map₂_left
@[simp]
theorem map₂_right [NeBot f] : map₂ (fun _ y => y) f g = g := by rw [map₂_swap, map₂_left]
#align filter.map₂_right Filter.map₂_right
#noalign filter.map₃
#noalign filter.map₂_map₂_left
#noalign filter.map₂_map₂_right
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/NAry.lean | 167 | 169 | theorem map_map₂ (m : α → β → γ) (n : γ → δ) :
(map₂ m f g).map n = map₂ (fun a b => n (m a b)) f g := by |
rw [← map_prod_eq_map₂, ← map_prod_eq_map₂, map_map]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 199 | 200 | theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by |
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import number_theory.divisors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
open scoped Classical
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (n : ℕ)
def divisors : Finset ℕ :=
Finset.filter (fun x : ℕ => x ∣ n) (Finset.Ico 1 (n + 1))
#align nat.divisors Nat.divisors
def properDivisors : Finset ℕ :=
Finset.filter (fun x : ℕ => x ∣ n) (Finset.Ico 1 n)
#align nat.proper_divisors Nat.properDivisors
def divisorsAntidiagonal : Finset (ℕ × ℕ) :=
Finset.filter (fun x => x.fst * x.snd = n) (Ico 1 (n + 1) ×ˢ Ico 1 (n + 1))
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_divisors (h : n ≠ 0) : (Finset.range n.succ).filter (· ∣ n) = n.divisors := by
ext
simp only [divisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
#align nat.filter_dvd_eq_divisors Nat.filter_dvd_eq_divisors
@[simp]
theorem filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
(Finset.range n).filter (· ∣ n) = n.properDivisors := by
ext
simp only [properDivisors, mem_filter, mem_range, mem_Ico, and_congr_left_iff, iff_and_self]
exact fun ha _ => succ_le_iff.mpr (pos_of_dvd_of_pos ha h.bot_lt)
#align nat.filter_dvd_eq_proper_divisors Nat.filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors
theorem properDivisors.not_self_mem : ¬n ∈ properDivisors n := by simp [properDivisors]
#align nat.proper_divisors.not_self_mem Nat.properDivisors.not_self_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ properDivisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ n < m := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [properDivisors]
simp only [and_comm, ← filter_dvd_eq_properDivisors hm, mem_filter, mem_range]
#align nat.mem_proper_divisors Nat.mem_properDivisors
theorem insert_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) : insert n (properDivisors n) = divisors n := by
rw [divisors, properDivisors, Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 h),
Finset.filter_insert, if_pos (dvd_refl n)]
#align nat.insert_self_proper_divisors Nat.insert_self_properDivisors
theorem cons_self_properDivisors (h : n ≠ 0) :
cons n (properDivisors n) properDivisors.not_self_mem = divisors n := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, insert_self_properDivisors h]
#align nat.cons_self_proper_divisors Nat.cons_self_properDivisors
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisors {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m ↔ n ∣ m ∧ m ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne m 0 with (rfl | hm); · simp [divisors]
simp only [hm, Ne, not_false_iff, and_true_iff, ← filter_dvd_eq_divisors hm, mem_filter,
mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
exact le_of_dvd hm.bot_lt
#align nat.mem_divisors Nat.mem_divisors
theorem one_mem_divisors : 1 ∈ divisors n ↔ n ≠ 0 := by simp
#align nat.one_mem_divisors Nat.one_mem_divisors
theorem mem_divisors_self (n : ℕ) (h : n ≠ 0) : n ∈ n.divisors :=
mem_divisors.2 ⟨dvd_rfl, h⟩
#align nat.mem_divisors_self Nat.mem_divisors_self
theorem dvd_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : n ∈ divisors m) : n ∣ m := by
cases m
· apply dvd_zero
· simp [mem_divisors.1 h]
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors Nat.dvd_of_mem_divisors
@[simp]
theorem mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x.fst * x.snd = n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
simp only [divisorsAntidiagonal, Finset.mem_Ico, Ne, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_product]
rw [and_comm]
apply and_congr_right
rintro rfl
constructor <;> intro h
· contrapose! h
simp [h]
· rw [Nat.lt_add_one_iff, Nat.lt_add_one_iff]
rw [mul_eq_zero, not_or] at h
simp only [succ_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.1), succ_le_of_lt (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.2),
true_and_iff]
exact
⟨Nat.le_mul_of_pos_right _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.2),
Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h.1)⟩
#align nat.mem_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
lemma ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 ∧ p.2 ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨hp₁, hp₂⟩ := Nat.mem_divisorsAntidiagonal.mp hp
exact mul_ne_zero_iff.mp (hp₁.symm ▸ hp₂)
lemma left_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.1 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).1
lemma right_ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {p : ℕ × ℕ} (hp : p ∈ n.divisorsAntidiagonal) :
p.2 ≠ 0 :=
(ne_zero_of_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal hp).2
theorem divisor_le {m : ℕ} : n ∈ divisors m → n ≤ m := by
cases' m with m
· simp
· simp only [mem_divisors, Nat.succ_ne_zero m, and_true_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.succ_pos m)
#align nat.divisor_le Nat.divisor_le
theorem divisors_subset_of_dvd {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) : divisors m ⊆ divisors n :=
Finset.subset_iff.2 fun _x hx => Nat.mem_divisors.mpr ⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.mp hx).1.trans h, hzero⟩
#align nat.divisors_subset_of_dvd Nat.divisors_subset_of_dvd
theorem divisors_subset_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (hzero : n ≠ 0) (h : m ∣ n) (hdiff : m ≠ n) :
divisors m ⊆ properDivisors n := by
apply Finset.subset_iff.2
intro x hx
exact
Nat.mem_properDivisors.2
⟨(Nat.mem_divisors.1 hx).1.trans h,
lt_of_le_of_lt (divisor_le hx)
(lt_of_le_of_ne (divisor_le (Nat.mem_divisors.2 ⟨h, hzero⟩)) hdiff)⟩
#align nat.divisors_subset_proper_divisors Nat.divisors_subset_properDivisors
lemma divisors_filter_dvd_of_dvd {n m : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hm : m ∣ n) :
(n.divisors.filter (· ∣ m)) = m.divisors := by
ext k
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_divisors]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, hkm⟩ ↦ ⟨hkm, ne_zero_of_dvd_ne_zero hn hm⟩, fun ⟨hk, _⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hk.trans hm, hn⟩, hk⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem divisors_zero : divisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_zero Nat.divisors_zero
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_zero : properDivisors 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.proper_divisors_zero Nat.properDivisors_zero
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_divisors : (divisors n).Nonempty ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨m, hm⟩ hn ↦ by simp [hn] at hm, fun hn ↦ ⟨1, one_mem_divisors.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma divisors_eq_empty : divisors n = ∅ ↔ n = 0 :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans nonempty_divisors.not_left
theorem properDivisors_subset_divisors : properDivisors n ⊆ divisors n :=
filter_subset_filter _ <| Ico_subset_Ico_right n.le_succ
#align nat.proper_divisors_subset_divisors Nat.properDivisors_subset_divisors
@[simp]
theorem divisors_one : divisors 1 = {1} := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_one Nat.divisors_one
@[simp]
theorem properDivisors_one : properDivisors 1 = ∅ := by rw [properDivisors, Ico_self, filter_empty]
#align nat.proper_divisors_one Nat.properDivisors_one
theorem pos_of_mem_divisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.divisors) : 0 < m := by
cases m
· rw [mem_divisors, zero_dvd_iff (a := n)] at h
cases h.2 h.1
apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.pos_of_mem_divisors Nat.pos_of_mem_divisors
theorem pos_of_mem_properDivisors {m : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 0 < m :=
pos_of_mem_divisors (properDivisors_subset_divisors h)
#align nat.pos_of_mem_proper_divisors Nat.pos_of_mem_properDivisors
theorem one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt : 1 ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ 1 < n := by
rw [mem_properDivisors, and_iff_right (one_dvd _)]
#align nat.one_mem_proper_divisors_iff_one_lt Nat.one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt
@[simp]
lemma sup_divisors_id (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sup id = n := by
refine le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ divisor_le) ?_
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· apply zero_le
· exact Finset.le_sup (f := id) <| mem_divisors_self n hn
lemma one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) : 1 < n :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (pos_of_mem_properDivisors h) (mem_properDivisors.1 h).2
lemma one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors {m n : ℕ} (h : m ∈ n.properDivisors) :
1 < n / m := by
obtain ⟨h_dvd, h_lt⟩ := mem_properDivisors.mp h
rwa [Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt h_dvd, mul_one]
lemma mem_properDivisors_iff_exists {m n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
m ∈ n.properDivisors ↔ ∃ k > 1, n = m * k := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨n / m, one_lt_div_of_mem_properDivisors h, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· exact (Nat.mul_div_cancel' (mem_properDivisors.mp h).1).symm
· rintro ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩
rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at hn
exact mem_properDivisors.mpr ⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, lt_mul_of_one_lt_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn.1) hk⟩
@[simp]
lemma nonempty_properDivisors : n.properDivisors.Nonempty ↔ 1 < n :=
⟨fun ⟨_m, hm⟩ ↦ one_lt_of_mem_properDivisors hm, fun hn ↦
⟨1, one_mem_properDivisors_iff_one_lt.2 hn⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma properDivisors_eq_empty : n.properDivisors = ∅ ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_properDivisors, not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_zero : divisorsAntidiagonal 0 = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal_zero Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal_zero
@[simp]
theorem divisorsAntidiagonal_one : divisorsAntidiagonal 1 = {(1, 1)} := by
ext
simp [mul_eq_one, Prod.ext_iff]
#align nat.divisors_antidiagonal_one Nat.divisorsAntidiagonal_one
-- @[simp]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.swap ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm, Prod.swap]
#align nat.swap_mem_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
-- Porting note: added below thm to replace the simp from the previous thm
@[simp]
theorem swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal_aux {x : ℕ × ℕ} :
x.snd * x.fst = n ∧ ¬n = 0 ↔ x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, mul_comm]
theorem fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.fst ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro _ h.1, h.2]
#align nat.fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal Nat.fst_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal
theorem snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal {x : ℕ × ℕ} (h : x ∈ divisorsAntidiagonal n) :
x.snd ∈ divisors n := by
rw [mem_divisorsAntidiagonal] at h
simp [Dvd.intro_left _ h.1, h.2]
#align nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal Nat.snd_mem_divisors_of_mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal :
(divisorsAntidiagonal n).map (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding = divisorsAntidiagonal n := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding, Equiv.coe_prodComm,
Set.image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]
ext
exact swap_mem_divisorsAntidiagonal
#align nat.map_swap_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.fst = divisors n := by
ext
simp [Dvd.dvd, @eq_comm _ n (_ * _)]
#align nat.image_fst_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal : (divisorsAntidiagonal n).image Prod.snd = divisors n := by
rw [← map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, map_eq_image, image_image]
exact image_fst_divisorsAntidiagonal
#align nat.image_snd_divisors_antidiagonal Nat.image_snd_divisorsAntidiagonal
theorem map_div_right_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (d, n / d), fun p₁ p₂ => congr_arg Prod.fst⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
ext ⟨d, nd⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_divisorsAntidiagonal, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, mem_divisors,
Prod.ext_iff, exists_prop, and_left_comm, exists_eq_left]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨⟨k, rfl⟩, hn⟩, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt]
exact ⟨rfl, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨dvd_mul_right _ _, hn⟩, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ (left_ne_zero_of_mul hn).bot_lt⟩
#align nat.map_div_right_divisors Nat.map_div_right_divisors
theorem map_div_left_divisors :
n.divisors.map ⟨fun d => (n / d, d), fun p₁ p₂ => congr_arg Prod.snd⟩ =
n.divisorsAntidiagonal := by
apply Finset.map_injective (Equiv.prodComm _ _).toEmbedding
ext
rw [map_swap_divisorsAntidiagonal, ← map_div_right_divisors, Finset.map_map]
simp
#align nat.map_div_left_divisors Nat.map_div_left_divisors
theorem sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self :
∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = (∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i) + n := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
· rw [← cons_self_properDivisors hn, Finset.sum_cons, add_comm]
#align nat.sum_divisors_eq_sum_proper_divisors_add_self Nat.sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self
def Perfect (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n ∧ 0 < n
#align nat.perfect Nat.Perfect
theorem perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors (h : 0 < n) : Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ properDivisors n, i = n :=
and_iff_left h
#align nat.perfect_iff_sum_proper_divisors Nat.perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors
theorem perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul (h : 0 < n) :
Perfect n ↔ ∑ i ∈ divisors n, i = 2 * n := by
rw [perfect_iff_sum_properDivisors h, sum_divisors_eq_sum_properDivisors_add_self, two_mul]
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [h]
· apply add_right_cancel h
#align nat.perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul Nat.perfect_iff_sum_divisors_eq_two_mul
theorem mem_divisors_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (k : ℕ) {x : ℕ} :
x ∈ divisors (p ^ k) ↔ ∃ j ≤ k, x = p ^ j := by
rw [mem_divisors, Nat.dvd_prime_pow pp, and_iff_left (ne_of_gt (pow_pos pp.pos k))]
#align nat.mem_divisors_prime_pow Nat.mem_divisors_prime_pow
theorem Prime.divisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : divisors p = {1, p} := by
ext
rw [mem_divisors, dvd_prime pp, and_iff_left pp.ne_zero, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton]
#align nat.prime.divisors Nat.Prime.divisors
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Divisors.lean | 377 | 379 | theorem Prime.properDivisors {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : properDivisors p = {1} := by |
rw [← erase_insert properDivisors.not_self_mem, insert_self_properDivisors pp.ne_zero,
pp.divisors, pair_comm, erase_insert fun con => pp.ne_one (mem_singleton.1 con)]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Basic
#align_import data.real.cau_seq_completion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cf4c49c445991489058260d75dae0ff2b1abca28"
namespace CauSeq.Completion
open CauSeq
section
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
variable {β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- TODO: rename this to `CauSeq.Completion` instead of `CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy`.
def Cauchy :=
@Quotient (CauSeq _ abv) CauSeq.equiv
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cau_seq.completion.Cauchy CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy
variable {abv}
def mk : CauSeq _ abv → Cauchy abv :=
Quotient.mk''
#align cau_seq.completion.mk CauSeq.Completion.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk (f : CauSeq _ abv) : @Eq (Cauchy abv) ⟦f⟧ (mk f) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_eq_mk CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq_mk
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq _ abv} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_eq CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq
def ofRat (x : β) : Cauchy abv :=
mk (const abv x)
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat CauSeq.Completion.ofRat
instance : Zero (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨ofRat 0⟩
instance : One (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨ofRat 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨0⟩
theorem ofRat_zero : (ofRat 0 : Cauchy abv) = 0 :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_zero CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_zero
theorem ofRat_one : (ofRat 1 : Cauchy abv) = 1 :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_one CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} : mk f = 0 ↔ LimZero f := by
have : mk f = 0 ↔ LimZero (f - 0) := Quotient.eq
rwa [sub_zero] at this
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_eq_zero CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq_zero
instance : Add (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map₂ (· + ·)) fun _ _ hf _ _ hg => add_equiv_add hf hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_add (f g : CauSeq β abv) : mk f + mk g = mk (f + g) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_add CauSeq.Completion.mk_add
instance : Neg (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map Neg.neg) fun _ _ hf => neg_equiv_neg hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_neg (f : CauSeq β abv) : -mk f = mk (-f) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_neg CauSeq.Completion.mk_neg
instance : Mul (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map₂ (· * ·)) fun _ _ hf _ _ hg => mul_equiv_mul hf hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mul (f g : CauSeq β abv) : mk f * mk g = mk (f * g) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_mul CauSeq.Completion.mk_mul
instance : Sub (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨(Quotient.map₂ Sub.sub) fun _ _ hf _ _ hg => sub_equiv_sub hf hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_sub (f g : CauSeq β abv) : mk f - mk g = mk (f - g) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_sub CauSeq.Completion.mk_sub
instance {γ : Type*} [SMul γ β] [IsScalarTower γ β β] : SMul γ (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun c => (Quotient.map (c • ·)) fun _ _ hf => smul_equiv_smul _ hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_smul {γ : Type*} [SMul γ β] [IsScalarTower γ β β] (c : γ) (f : CauSeq β abv) :
c • mk f = mk (c • f) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_smul CauSeq.Completion.mk_smul
instance : Pow (Cauchy abv) ℕ :=
⟨fun x n => Quotient.map (· ^ n) (fun _ _ hf => pow_equiv_pow hf _) x⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_pow (n : ℕ) (f : CauSeq β abv) : mk f ^ n = mk (f ^ n) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_pow CauSeq.Completion.mk_pow
instance : NatCast (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun n => mk n⟩
instance : IntCast (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun n => mk n⟩
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_natCast (n : ℕ) : (ofRat n : Cauchy abv) = n :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_nat_cast CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_natCast
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_intCast (z : ℤ) : (ofRat z : Cauchy abv) = z :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_int_cast CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_intCast
theorem ofRat_add (x y : β) :
ofRat (x + y) = (ofRat x + ofRat y : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_add _ _)
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_add CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_add
theorem ofRat_neg (x : β) : ofRat (-x) = (-ofRat x : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_neg _)
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_neg CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_neg
theorem ofRat_mul (x y : β) :
ofRat (x * y) = (ofRat x * ofRat y : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_mul _ _)
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_mul CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_mul
private theorem zero_def : 0 = @mk _ _ _ _ abv _ 0 :=
rfl
private theorem one_def : 1 = @mk _ _ _ _ abv _ 1 :=
rfl
instance Cauchy.ring : Ring (Cauchy abv) :=
Function.Surjective.ring mk (surjective_quotient_mk' _) zero_def.symm one_def.symm
(fun _ _ => (mk_add _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_mul _ _).symm) (fun _ => (mk_neg _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_sub _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_pow _ _).symm) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
@[simps]
def ofRatRingHom : β →+* (Cauchy abv) where
toFun := ofRat
map_zero' := ofRat_zero
map_one' := ofRat_one
map_add' := ofRat_add
map_mul' := ofRat_mul
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_ring_hom CauSeq.Completion.ofRatRingHom
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_ring_hom_apply CauSeq.Completion.ofRatRingHom_apply
theorem ofRat_sub (x y : β) : ofRat (x - y) = (ofRat x - ofRat y : Cauchy abv) :=
congr_arg mk (const_sub _ _)
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_sub CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_sub
end
section
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
variable {β : Type*} [CommRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
instance Cauchy.commRing : CommRing (Cauchy abv) :=
Function.Surjective.commRing mk (surjective_quotient_mk' _) zero_def.symm one_def.symm
(fun _ _ => (mk_add _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_mul _ _).symm) (fun _ => (mk_neg _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_sub _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm) (fun _ _ => (mk_smul _ _).symm)
(fun _ _ => (mk_pow _ _).symm) (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
end
open scoped Classical
section
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
variable {β : Type*} [DivisionRing β] {abv : β → α} [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast (Cauchy abv) where nnratCast q := ofRat q
instance instRatCast : RatCast (Cauchy abv) where ratCast q := ofRat q
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofRat_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : ofRat (q : β) = (q : Cauchy abv) := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma ofRat_ratCast (q : ℚ) : ofRat (q : β) = (q : Cauchy abv) := rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_rat_cast CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_ratCast
noncomputable instance : Inv (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨fun x =>
(Quotient.liftOn x fun f => mk <| if h : LimZero f then 0 else inv f h) fun f g fg => by
have := limZero_congr fg
by_cases hf : LimZero f
· simp [hf, this.1 hf, Setoid.refl]
· have hg := mt this.2 hf
simp only [hf, dite_false, hg]
have If : mk (inv f hf) * mk f = 1 := mk_eq.2 (inv_mul_cancel hf)
have Ig : mk (inv g hg) * mk g = 1 := mk_eq.2 (inv_mul_cancel hg)
have Ig' : mk g * mk (inv g hg) = 1 := mk_eq.2 (mul_inv_cancel hg)
rw [mk_eq.2 fg, ← Ig] at If
rw [← mul_one (mk (inv f hf)), ← Ig', ← mul_assoc, If, mul_assoc, Ig', mul_one]⟩
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem inv_zero : (0 : (Cauchy abv))⁻¹ = 0 :=
congr_arg mk <| by rw [dif_pos] <;> [rfl; exact zero_limZero]
#align cau_seq.completion.inv_zero CauSeq.Completion.inv_zero
@[simp]
theorem inv_mk {f} (hf) : (@mk α _ β _ abv _ f)⁻¹ = mk (inv f hf) :=
congr_arg mk <| by rw [dif_neg]
#align cau_seq.completion.inv_mk CauSeq.Completion.inv_mk
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Completion.lean | 238 | 241 | theorem cau_seq_zero_ne_one : ¬(0 : CauSeq _ abv) ≈ 1 := fun h =>
have : LimZero (1 - 0 : CauSeq _ abv) := Setoid.symm h
have : LimZero 1 := by | simpa
by apply one_ne_zero <| const_limZero.1 this
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
#align real.tan_add Real.tan_add
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
#align real.tan_add' Real.tan_add'
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
#align real.tan_two_mul Real.tan_two_mul
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
#align real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two Real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
exact continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun x => id
#align real.continuous_on_tan Real.continuousOn_tan
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
#align real.continuous_tan Real.continuous_tan
theorem continuousOn_tan_Ioo : ContinuousOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
refine ContinuousOn.mono continuousOn_tan fun x => ?_
simp only [and_imp, mem_Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [cos_eq_zero_iff]
rintro hx_gt hx_lt ⟨r, hxr_eq⟩
rcases le_or_lt 0 r with h | h
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_lt
refine hx_lt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
simp [h]
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_gt
refine hx_gt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
have hr_le : r ≤ -1 := by rwa [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right] at h
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm, ← le_div_iff]
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg]; norm_cast
· exact zero_lt_two
#align real.continuous_on_tan_Ioo Real.continuousOn_tan_Ioo
theorem surjOn_tan : SurjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) univ :=
have := neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos
continuousOn_tan_Ioo.surjOn_of_tendsto (nonempty_Ioo.2 this)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot this]; exact tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop this]; exact tendsto_tan_pi_div_two)
#align real.surj_on_tan Real.surjOn_tan
theorem tan_surjective : Function.Surjective tan := fun _ => surjOn_tan.subset_range trivial
#align real.tan_surjective Real.tan_surjective
theorem image_tan_Ioo : tan '' Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1 surjOn_tan
#align real.image_tan_Ioo Real.image_tan_Ioo
def tanOrderIso : Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o ℝ :=
(strictMonoOn_tan.orderIso _ _).trans <|
(OrderIso.setCongr _ _ image_tan_Ioo).trans OrderIso.Set.univ
#align real.tan_order_iso Real.tanOrderIso
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
tanOrderIso.symm x
#align real.arctan Real.arctan
@[simp]
theorem tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
tanOrderIso.apply_symm_apply x
#align real.tan_arctan Real.tan_arctan
theorem arctan_mem_Ioo (x : ℝ) : arctan x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arctan_mem_Ioo Real.arctan_mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem range_arctan : range arctan = Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
((EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _).trans Subtype.range_coe
#align real.range_arctan Real.range_arctan
theorem arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| tanOrderIso.symm_apply_apply ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arctan_tan Real.arctan_tan
theorem cos_arctan_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < cos (arctan x) :=
cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x
#align real.cos_arctan_pos Real.cos_arctan_pos
theorem cos_sq_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) ^ 2 = 1 / (1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x).ne', tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_sq_arctan Real.cos_sq_arctan
theorem sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [← tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
#align real.sin_arctan Real.sin_arctan
theorem cos_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) = 1 / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_arctan Real.cos_arctan
theorem arctan_lt_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arctan x < π / 2 :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).2
#align real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two Real.arctan_lt_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) < arctan x :=
(arctan_mem_Ioo x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arctan
theorem arctan_eq_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arctan x = arcsin (x / √(1 + x ^ 2)) :=
Eq.symm <| arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (sin_arctan x) (mem_Icc_of_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x)
#align real.arctan_eq_arcsin Real.arctan_eq_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_arctan {x : ℝ} (h : x ∈ Ioo (-(1 : ℝ)) 1) :
arcsin x = arctan (x / √(1 - x ^ 2)) := by
rw_mod_cast [arctan_eq_arcsin, div_pow, sq_sqrt, one_add_div, div_div, ← sqrt_mul,
mul_div_cancel₀, sub_add_cancel, sqrt_one, div_one] <;> simp at h <;> nlinarith [h.1, h.2]
#align real.arcsin_eq_arctan Real.arcsin_eq_arctan
@[simp]
theorem arctan_zero : arctan 0 = 0 := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin]
#align real.arctan_zero Real.arctan_zero
@[mono]
theorem arctan_strictMono : StrictMono arctan := tanOrderIso.symm.strictMono
theorem arctan_injective : arctan.Injective := arctan_strictMono.injective
@[simp]
theorem arctan_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arctan x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
.trans (by rw [arctan_zero]) arctan_injective.eq_iff
theorem tendsto_arctan_atTop : Tendsto arctan atTop (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atTop.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atTop
theorem tendsto_arctan_atBot : Tendsto arctan atBot (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) :=
tendsto_Ioo_atBot.mp tanOrderIso.symm.tendsto_atBot
theorem arctan_eq_of_tan_eq {x y : ℝ} (h : tan x = y) (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arctan y = x :=
injOn_tan (arctan_mem_Ioo _) hx (by rw [tan_arctan, h])
#align real.arctan_eq_of_tan_eq Real.arctan_eq_of_tan_eq
@[simp]
theorem arctan_one : arctan 1 = π / 4 :=
arctan_eq_of_tan_eq tan_pi_div_four <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.arctan_one Real.arctan_one
@[simp]
theorem arctan_neg (x : ℝ) : arctan (-x) = -arctan x := by simp [arctan_eq_arcsin, neg_div]
#align real.arctan_neg Real.arctan_neg
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 201 | 206 | theorem arctan_eq_arccos {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : arctan x = arccos (√(1 + x ^ 2))⁻¹ := by |
rw [arctan_eq_arcsin, arccos_eq_arcsin]; swap; · exact inv_nonneg.2 (sqrt_nonneg _)
congr 1
rw_mod_cast [← sqrt_inv, sq_sqrt, ← one_div, one_sub_div, add_sub_cancel_left, sqrt_div,
sqrt_sq h]
all_goals positivity
|
import Mathlib.Init.Align
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
#align_import geometry.manifold.charted_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"431589bce478b2229eba14b14a283250428217db"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace Topology
universe u
variable {H : Type u} {H' : Type*} {M : Type*} {M' : Type*} {M'' : Type*}
scoped[Manifold] infixr:100 " ≫ₕ " => PartialHomeomorph.trans
scoped[Manifold] infixr:100 " ≫ " => PartialEquiv.trans
open Set PartialHomeomorph Manifold -- Porting note: Added `Manifold`
section Groupoid
structure StructureGroupoid (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] where
members : Set (PartialHomeomorph H H)
trans' : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ∈ members → e ≫ₕ e' ∈ members
symm' : ∀ e : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e.symm ∈ members
id_mem' : PartialHomeomorph.refl H ∈ members
locality' : ∀ e : PartialHomeomorph H H,
(∀ x ∈ e.source, ∃ s, IsOpen s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ members) → e ∈ members
mem_of_eqOnSource' : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H, e ∈ members → e' ≈ e → e' ∈ members
#align structure_groupoid StructureGroupoid
variable [TopologicalSpace H]
instance : Membership (PartialHomeomorph H H) (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun (e : PartialHomeomorph H H) (G : StructureGroupoid H) ↦ e ∈ G.members⟩
instance (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] :
SetLike (StructureGroupoid H) (PartialHomeomorph H H) where
coe s := s.members
coe_injective' N O h := by cases N; cases O; congr
instance : Inf (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun G G' => StructureGroupoid.mk
(members := G.members ∩ G'.members)
(trans' := fun e e' he he' =>
⟨G.trans' e e' he.left he'.left, G'.trans' e e' he.right he'.right⟩)
(symm' := fun e he => ⟨G.symm' e he.left, G'.symm' e he.right⟩)
(id_mem' := ⟨G.id_mem', G'.id_mem'⟩)
(locality' := by
intro e hx
apply (mem_inter_iff e G.members G'.members).mpr
refine And.intro (G.locality' e ?_) (G'.locality' e ?_)
all_goals
intro x hex
rcases hx x hex with ⟨s, hs⟩
use s
refine And.intro hs.left (And.intro hs.right.left ?_)
· exact hs.right.right.left
· exact hs.right.right.right)
(mem_of_eqOnSource' := fun e e' he hee' =>
⟨G.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he.left hee', G'.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he.right hee'⟩)⟩
instance : InfSet (StructureGroupoid H) :=
⟨fun S => StructureGroupoid.mk
(members := ⋂ s ∈ S, s.members)
(trans' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e e' he he' i hi
exact i.trans' e e' (he i hi) (he' i hi))
(symm' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e he i hi
exact i.symm' e (he i hi))
(id_mem' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro i _
exact i.id_mem')
(locality' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e he i hi
refine i.locality' e ?_
intro x hex
rcases he x hex with ⟨s, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, ⟨hs.left, ⟨hs.right.left, hs.right.right i hi⟩⟩⟩)
(mem_of_eqOnSource' := by
simp only [mem_iInter]
intro e e' he he'e
exact fun i hi => i.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' (he i hi) he'e)⟩
theorem StructureGroupoid.trans (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (he' : e' ∈ G) : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ G :=
G.trans' e e' he he'
#align structure_groupoid.trans StructureGroupoid.trans
theorem StructureGroupoid.symm (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G) :
e.symm ∈ G :=
G.symm' e he
#align structure_groupoid.symm StructureGroupoid.symm
theorem StructureGroupoid.id_mem (G : StructureGroupoid H) : PartialHomeomorph.refl H ∈ G :=
G.id_mem'
#align structure_groupoid.id_mem StructureGroupoid.id_mem
theorem StructureGroupoid.locality (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(h : ∀ x ∈ e.source, ∃ s, IsOpen s ∧ x ∈ s ∧ e.restr s ∈ G) : e ∈ G :=
G.locality' e h
#align structure_groupoid.locality StructureGroupoid.locality
theorem StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource (G : StructureGroupoid H) {e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H}
(he : e ∈ G) (h : e' ≈ e) : e' ∈ G :=
G.mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he h
#align structure_groupoid.eq_on_source StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource
theorem StructureGroupoid.mem_iff_of_eqOnSource {G : StructureGroupoid H}
{e e' : PartialHomeomorph H H} (h : e ≈ e') : e ∈ G ↔ e' ∈ G :=
⟨fun he ↦ G.mem_of_eqOnSource he (Setoid.symm h), fun he' ↦ G.mem_of_eqOnSource he' h⟩
instance StructureGroupoid.partialOrder : PartialOrder (StructureGroupoid H) :=
PartialOrder.lift StructureGroupoid.members fun a b h ↦ by
cases a
cases b
dsimp at h
induction h
rfl
#align structure_groupoid.partial_order StructureGroupoid.partialOrder
theorem StructureGroupoid.le_iff {G₁ G₂ : StructureGroupoid H} : G₁ ≤ G₂ ↔ ∀ e, e ∈ G₁ → e ∈ G₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align structure_groupoid.le_iff StructureGroupoid.le_iff
def idGroupoid (H : Type u) [TopologicalSpace H] : StructureGroupoid H where
members := {PartialHomeomorph.refl H} ∪ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ }
trans' e e' he he' := by
cases' he with he he
· simpa only [mem_singleton_iff.1 he, refl_trans]
· have : (e ≫ₕ e').source ⊆ e.source := sep_subset _ _
rw [he] at this
have : e ≫ₕ e' ∈ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ } := eq_bot_iff.2 this
exact (mem_union _ _ _).2 (Or.inr this)
symm' e he := by
cases' (mem_union _ _ _).1 he with E E
· simp [mem_singleton_iff.mp E]
· right
simpa only [e.toPartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target.symm, mfld_simps] using E
id_mem' := mem_union_left _ rfl
locality' e he := by
rcases e.source.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· right
exact h
· left
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases he x hx with ⟨s, open_s, xs, hs⟩
have x's : x ∈ (e.restr s).source := by
rw [restr_source, open_s.interior_eq]
exact ⟨hx, xs⟩
cases' hs with hs hs
· replace hs : PartialHomeomorph.restr e s = PartialHomeomorph.refl H := by
simpa only using hs
have : (e.restr s).source = univ := by
rw [hs]
simp
have : e.toPartialEquiv.source ∩ interior s = univ := this
have : univ ⊆ interior s := by
rw [← this]
exact inter_subset_right
have : s = univ := by rwa [open_s.interior_eq, univ_subset_iff] at this
simpa only [this, restr_univ] using hs
· exfalso
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hs
rwa [hs] at x's
mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he he'e := by
cases' he with he he
· left
have : e = e' := by
refine eq_of_eqOnSource_univ (Setoid.symm he'e) ?_ ?_ <;>
rw [Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 he] <;> rfl
rwa [← this]
· right
have he : e.toPartialEquiv.source = ∅ := he
rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, EqOnSource.source_eq he'e]
#align id_groupoid idGroupoid
instance instStructureGroupoidOrderBot : OrderBot (StructureGroupoid H) where
bot := idGroupoid H
bot_le := by
intro u f hf
have hf : f ∈ {PartialHomeomorph.refl H} ∪ { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | e.source = ∅ } := hf
simp only [singleton_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_insert_iff] at hf
cases' hf with hf hf
· rw [hf]
apply u.id_mem
· apply u.locality
intro x hx
rw [hf, mem_empty_iff_false] at hx
exact hx.elim
instance : Inhabited (StructureGroupoid H) := ⟨idGroupoid H⟩
structure Pregroupoid (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] where
property : (H → H) → Set H → Prop
comp : ∀ {f g u v}, property f u → property g v →
IsOpen u → IsOpen v → IsOpen (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v) → property (g ∘ f) (u ∩ f ⁻¹' v)
id_mem : property id univ
locality :
∀ {f u}, IsOpen u → (∀ x ∈ u, ∃ v, IsOpen v ∧ x ∈ v ∧ property f (u ∩ v)) → property f u
congr : ∀ {f g : H → H} {u}, IsOpen u → (∀ x ∈ u, g x = f x) → property f u → property g u
#align pregroupoid Pregroupoid
def Pregroupoid.groupoid (PG : Pregroupoid H) : StructureGroupoid H where
members := { e : PartialHomeomorph H H | PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target }
trans' e e' he he' := by
constructor
· apply PG.comp he.1 he'.1 e.open_source e'.open_source
apply e.continuousOn_toFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e.open_source e'.open_source
· apply PG.comp he'.2 he.2 e'.open_target e.open_target
apply e'.continuousOn_invFun.isOpen_inter_preimage e'.open_target e.open_target
symm' e he := ⟨he.2, he.1⟩
id_mem' := ⟨PG.id_mem, PG.id_mem⟩
locality' e he := by
constructor
· refine PG.locality e.open_source fun x xu ↦ ?_
rcases he x xu with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩
refine ⟨s, s_open, xs, ?_⟩
convert hs.1 using 1
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.restr]
rw [s_open.interior_eq]
· refine PG.locality e.open_target fun x xu ↦ ?_
rcases he (e.symm x) (e.map_target xu) with ⟨s, s_open, xs, hs⟩
refine ⟨e.target ∩ e.symm ⁻¹' s, ?_, ⟨xu, xs⟩, ?_⟩
· exact ContinuousOn.isOpen_inter_preimage e.continuousOn_invFun e.open_target s_open
· rw [← inter_assoc, inter_self]
convert hs.2 using 1
dsimp [PartialHomeomorph.restr]
rw [s_open.interior_eq]
mem_of_eqOnSource' e e' he ee' := by
constructor
· apply PG.congr e'.open_source ee'.2
simp only [ee'.1, he.1]
· have A := EqOnSource.symm' ee'
apply PG.congr e'.symm.open_source A.2
-- Porting note: was
-- convert he.2
-- rw [A.1]
-- rfl
rw [A.1, symm_toPartialEquiv, PartialEquiv.symm_source]
exact he.2
#align pregroupoid.groupoid Pregroupoid.groupoid
theorem mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid {PG : Pregroupoid H} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} :
e ∈ PG.groupoid ↔ PG.property e e.source ∧ PG.property e.symm e.target :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ChartedSpace.lean | 419 | 423 | theorem groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le (PG₁ PG₂ : Pregroupoid H)
(h : ∀ f s, PG₁.property f s → PG₂.property f s) : PG₁.groupoid ≤ PG₂.groupoid := by |
refine StructureGroupoid.le_iff.2 fun e he ↦ ?_
rw [mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid] at he ⊢
exact ⟨h _ _ he.1, h _ _ he.2⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Star.Spectrum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Quotient
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Units
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Ideals
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.StoneWeierstrass
#align_import analysis.normed_space.star.gelfand_duality from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e65771194f9e923a70dfb49b6ca7be6e400d8b6f"
open WeakDual
open scoped NNReal
section ComplexBanachAlgebra
open Ideal
variable {A : Type*} [NormedCommRing A] [NormedAlgebra ℂ A] [CompleteSpace A] (I : Ideal A)
[Ideal.IsMaximal I]
noncomputable def Ideal.toCharacterSpace : characterSpace ℂ A :=
CharacterSpace.equivAlgHom.symm <|
((NormedRing.algEquivComplexOfComplete
(letI := Quotient.field I; isUnit_iff_ne_zero (G₀ := A ⧸ I))).symm : A ⧸ I →ₐ[ℂ] ℂ).comp <|
Quotient.mkₐ ℂ I
#align ideal.to_character_space Ideal.toCharacterSpace
theorem Ideal.toCharacterSpace_apply_eq_zero_of_mem {a : A} (ha : a ∈ I) :
I.toCharacterSpace a = 0 := by
unfold Ideal.toCharacterSpace
simp only [CharacterSpace.equivAlgHom_symm_coe, AlgHom.coe_comp, AlgHom.coe_coe,
Quotient.mkₐ_eq_mk, Function.comp_apply, NormedRing.algEquivComplexOfComplete_symm_apply]
simp_rw [Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr ha, spectrum.zero_eq]
exact Set.eq_of_mem_singleton (Set.singleton_nonempty (0 : ℂ)).some_mem
#align ideal.to_character_space_apply_eq_zero_of_mem Ideal.toCharacterSpace_apply_eq_zero_of_mem
theorem WeakDual.CharacterSpace.exists_apply_eq_zero {a : A} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) :
∃ f : characterSpace ℂ A, f a = 0 := by
obtain ⟨M, hM, haM⟩ := (span {a}).exists_le_maximal (span_singleton_ne_top ha)
exact
⟨M.toCharacterSpace,
M.toCharacterSpace_apply_eq_zero_of_mem
(haM (mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨1, (mul_one a).symm⟩))⟩
#align weak_dual.character_space.exists_apply_eq_zero WeakDual.CharacterSpace.exists_apply_eq_zero
theorem WeakDual.CharacterSpace.mem_spectrum_iff_exists {a : A} {z : ℂ} :
z ∈ spectrum ℂ a ↔ ∃ f : characterSpace ℂ A, f a = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := WeakDual.CharacterSpace.exists_apply_eq_zero hz
simp only [map_sub, sub_eq_zero, AlgHomClass.commutes] at hf
exact ⟨_, hf.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact AlgHom.apply_mem_spectrum f a
#align weak_dual.character_space.mem_spectrum_iff_exists WeakDual.CharacterSpace.mem_spectrum_iff_exists
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Star/GelfandDuality.lean | 119 | 123 | theorem spectrum.gelfandTransform_eq (a : A) :
spectrum ℂ (gelfandTransform ℂ A a) = spectrum ℂ a := by |
ext z
rw [ContinuousMap.spectrum_eq_range, WeakDual.CharacterSpace.mem_spectrum_iff_exists]
exact Iff.rfl
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.LocalizationLocalization
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Submodule
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.TFAE
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.dvr from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
structure IsDedekindDomainDvr : Prop where
isNoetherianRing : IsNoetherianRing A
is_dvr_at_nonzero_prime : ∀ P ≠ (⊥ : Ideal A), ∀ _ : P.IsPrime,
DiscreteValuationRing (Localization.AtPrime P)
#align is_dedekind_domain_dvr IsDedekindDomainDvr
theorem Ring.DimensionLEOne.localization {R : Type*} (Rₘ : Type*) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R]
[CommRing Rₘ] [Algebra R Rₘ] {M : Submonoid R} [IsLocalization M Rₘ] (hM : M ≤ R⁰)
[h : Ring.DimensionLEOne R] : Ring.DimensionLEOne Rₘ := ⟨by
intro p hp0 hpp
refine Ideal.isMaximal_def.mpr ⟨hpp.ne_top, Ideal.maximal_of_no_maximal fun P hpP hPm => ?_⟩
have hpP' : (⟨p, hpp⟩ : { p : Ideal Rₘ // p.IsPrime }) < ⟨P, hPm.isPrime⟩ := hpP
rw [← (IsLocalization.orderIsoOfPrime M Rₘ).lt_iff_lt] at hpP'
haveI : Ideal.IsPrime (Ideal.comap (algebraMap R Rₘ) p) :=
((IsLocalization.orderIsoOfPrime M Rₘ) ⟨p, hpp⟩).2.1
haveI : Ideal.IsPrime (Ideal.comap (algebraMap R Rₘ) P) :=
((IsLocalization.orderIsoOfPrime M Rₘ) ⟨P, hPm.isPrime⟩).2.1
have hlt : Ideal.comap (algebraMap R Rₘ) p < Ideal.comap (algebraMap R Rₘ) P := hpP'
refine h.not_lt_lt ⊥ (Ideal.comap _ _) (Ideal.comap _ _) ⟨?_, hlt⟩
exact IsLocalization.bot_lt_comap_prime _ _ hM _ hp0⟩
#align ring.dimension_le_one.localization Ring.DimensionLEOne.localization
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Dvr.lean | 88 | 108 | theorem IsLocalization.isDedekindDomain [IsDedekindDomain A] {M : Submonoid A} (hM : M ≤ A⁰)
(Aₘ : Type*) [CommRing Aₘ] [IsDomain Aₘ] [Algebra A Aₘ] [IsLocalization M Aₘ] :
IsDedekindDomain Aₘ := by |
have h : ∀ y : M, IsUnit (algebraMap A (FractionRing A) y) := by
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
exact IsUnit.mk0 _ (mt IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero (hM hy)))
letI : Algebra Aₘ (FractionRing A) := RingHom.toAlgebra (IsLocalization.lift h)
haveI : IsScalarTower A Aₘ (FractionRing A) :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq fun x => (IsLocalization.lift_eq h x).symm
haveI : IsFractionRing Aₘ (FractionRing A) :=
IsFractionRing.isFractionRing_of_isDomain_of_isLocalization M _ _
refine (isDedekindDomain_iff _ (FractionRing A)).mpr ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· infer_instance
· exact IsLocalization.isNoetherianRing M _ (by infer_instance)
· exact Ring.DimensionLEOne.localization Aₘ hM
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨⟨y, y_mem⟩, hy⟩ := hx.exists_multiple_integral_of_isLocalization M _
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (isIntegrallyClosed_iff _).mp IsDedekindRing.toIsIntegralClosure hy
refine ⟨IsLocalization.mk' Aₘ z ⟨y, y_mem⟩, (IsLocalization.lift_mk'_spec _ _ _ _).mpr ?_⟩
rw [hz, ← Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
#align_import data.polynomial.expand from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
universe u v w
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (p q : ℕ)
noncomputable def expand : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ (eval₂RingHom C (X ^ p) : R[X] →+* R[X]) with commutes' := fun _ => eval₂_C _ _ }
#align polynomial.expand Polynomial.expand
theorem coe_expand : (expand R p : R[X] → R[X]) = eval₂ C (X ^ p) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_expand Polynomial.coe_expand
variable {R}
theorem expand_eq_comp_X_pow {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.comp (X ^ p) := rfl
theorem expand_eq_sum {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.sum fun e a => C a * (X ^ p) ^ e := by
simp [expand, eval₂]
#align polynomial.expand_eq_sum Polynomial.expand_eq_sum
@[simp]
theorem expand_C (r : R) : expand R p (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_C Polynomial.expand_C
@[simp]
theorem expand_X : expand R p X = X ^ p :=
eval₂_X _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_X Polynomial.expand_X
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (r : R) : expand R p (monomial q r) = monomial (q * p) r := by
simp_rw [← smul_X_eq_monomial, AlgHom.map_smul, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, mul_comm, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_monomial Polynomial.expand_monomial
theorem expand_expand (f : R[X]) : expand R p (expand R q f) = expand R (p * q) f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by simp_rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by simp_rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
simp_rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_expand Polynomial.expand_expand
theorem expand_mul (f : R[X]) : expand R (p * q) f = expand R p (expand R q f) :=
(expand_expand p q f).symm
#align polynomial.expand_mul Polynomial.expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem expand_zero (f : R[X]) : expand R 0 f = C (eval 1 f) := by simp [expand]
#align polynomial.expand_zero Polynomial.expand_zero
@[simp]
theorem expand_one (f : R[X]) : expand R 1 f = f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_one]
#align polynomial.expand_one Polynomial.expand_one
theorem expand_pow (f : R[X]) : expand R (p ^ q) f = (expand R p)^[q] f :=
Nat.recOn q (by rw [pow_zero, expand_one, Function.iterate_zero, id]) fun n ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', pow_succ', expand_mul, ih]
#align polynomial.expand_pow Polynomial.expand_pow
theorem derivative_expand (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.derivative (expand R p f) =
expand R p (Polynomial.derivative f) * (p * (X ^ (p - 1) : R[X])) := by
rw [coe_expand, derivative_eval₂_C, derivative_pow, C_eq_natCast, derivative_X, mul_one]
#align polynomial.derivative_expand Polynomial.derivative_expand
theorem coeff_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff n = if p ∣ n then f.coeff (n / p) else 0 := by
simp only [expand_eq_sum]
simp_rw [coeff_sum, ← pow_mul, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial, sum]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (n / p), Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ hb2
rw [if_neg]
intro hb3
apply hb2
rw [← hb3, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left b hp]
· intro hn
rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hn]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro k _
rw [if_neg]
exact fun hkn => h ⟨k, hkn.symm⟩
#align polynomial.coeff_expand Polynomial.coeff_expand
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (n * p) = f.coeff n := by
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_mul_left _ _), Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul' {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (p * n) = f.coeff n := by rw [mul_comm, coeff_expand_mul hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul' Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul'
theorem expand_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : Function.Injective (expand R n) := fun g g' H =>
ext fun k => by rw [← coeff_expand_mul hn, H, coeff_expand_mul hn]
#align polynomial.expand_injective Polynomial.expand_injective
theorem expand_inj {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f g : R[X]} : expand R p f = expand R p g ↔ f = g :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff
#align polynomial.expand_inj Polynomial.expand_inj
theorem expand_eq_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff' (map_zero _)
#align polynomial.expand_eq_zero Polynomial.expand_eq_zero
theorem expand_ne_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f ≠ 0 ↔ f ≠ 0 :=
(expand_eq_zero hp).not
#align polynomial.expand_ne_zero Polynomial.expand_ne_zero
theorem expand_eq_C {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} {r : R} : expand R p f = C r ↔ f = C r := by
rw [← expand_C, expand_inj hp, expand_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_eq_C Polynomial.expand_eq_C
theorem natDegree_expand (p : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : (expand R p f).natDegree = f.natDegree * p := by
rcases p.eq_zero_or_pos with hp | hp
· rw [hp, coe_expand, pow_zero, mul_zero, ← C_1, eval₂_hom, natDegree_C]
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, AlgHom.map_zero, natDegree_zero, zero_mul]
have hf1 : expand R p f ≠ 0 := mt (expand_eq_zero hp).1 hf
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
convert (degree_eq_natDegree hf1).symm -- Porting note: was `rw [degree_eq_natDegree hf1]`
symm
refine le_antisymm ((degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun n hn => ?_) ?_
· rw [coeff_expand hp]
split_ifs with hpn
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
contrapose! hn
erw [WithBot.coe_le_coe, ← Nat.div_mul_cancel hpn]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right p hn
· rfl
· refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
erw [coeff_expand_mul hp, ← leadingCoeff]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hf
#align polynomial.nat_degree_expand Polynomial.natDegree_expand
theorem leadingCoeff_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) :
(expand R p f).leadingCoeff = f.leadingCoeff := by
simp_rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_expand, coeff_expand_mul hp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Expand.lean | 179 | 180 | theorem monic_expand_iff {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) : (expand R p f).Monic ↔ f.Monic := by |
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff_expand hp]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.equalizers from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4698e35ca56a0d4fa53aa5639c3364e0a77f4eba"
section
open CategoryTheory Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash -- Porting note: no tidy nor cases_bash
universe v v₂ u u₂
inductive WalkingParallelPair : Type
| zero
| one
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
open WalkingParallelPair
inductive WalkingParallelPairHom : WalkingParallelPair → WalkingParallelPair → Type
| left : WalkingParallelPairHom zero one
| right : WalkingParallelPairHom zero one
| id (X : WalkingParallelPair) : WalkingParallelPairHom X X
deriving DecidableEq
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPairHom
attribute [-simp, nolint simpNF] WalkingParallelPairHom.id.sizeOf_spec
instance : Inhabited (WalkingParallelPairHom zero one) where default := WalkingParallelPairHom.left
open WalkingParallelPairHom
def WalkingParallelPairHom.comp :
-- Porting note: changed X Y Z to implicit to match comp fields in precategory
∀ { X Y Z : WalkingParallelPair } (_ : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y)
(_ : WalkingParallelPairHom Y Z), WalkingParallelPairHom X Z
| _, _, _, id _, h => h
| _, _, _, left, id one => left
| _, _, _, right, id one => right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_hom.comp CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPairHom.comp
-- Porting note: adding these since they are simple and aesop couldn't directly prove them
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.id_comp
{X Y : WalkingParallelPair} (g : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y) : comp (id X) g = g :=
rfl
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.comp_id
{X Y : WalkingParallelPair} (f : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y) : comp f (id Y) = f := by
cases f <;> rfl
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.assoc {X Y Z W : WalkingParallelPair}
(f : WalkingParallelPairHom X Y) (g: WalkingParallelPairHom Y Z)
(h : WalkingParallelPairHom Z W) : comp (comp f g) h = comp f (comp g h) := by
cases f <;> cases g <;> cases h <;> rfl
instance walkingParallelPairHomCategory : SmallCategory WalkingParallelPair where
Hom := WalkingParallelPairHom
id := id
comp := comp
comp_id := comp_id
id_comp := id_comp
assoc := assoc
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_hom_category CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairHomCategory
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairHom_id (X : WalkingParallelPair) : WalkingParallelPairHom.id X = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_hom_id CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairHom_id
-- Porting note: simpNF asked me to do this because the LHS of the non-primed version reduced
@[simp]
theorem WalkingParallelPairHom.id.sizeOf_spec' (X : WalkingParallelPair) :
(WalkingParallelPairHom._sizeOf_inst X X).sizeOf (𝟙 X) = 1 + sizeOf X := by cases X <;> rfl
def walkingParallelPairOp : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ where
obj x := op <| by cases x; exacts [one, zero]
map f := by
cases f <;> apply Quiver.Hom.op
exacts [left, right, WalkingParallelPairHom.id _]
map_comp := by rintro _ _ _ (_|_|_) g <;> cases g <;> rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOp
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_zero : walkingParallelPairOp.obj zero = op one := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOp_zero
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_one : walkingParallelPairOp.obj one = op zero := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_one CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOp_one
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_left :
walkingParallelPairOp.map left = @Quiver.Hom.op _ _ zero one left := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_left CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOp_left
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOp_right :
walkingParallelPairOp.map right = @Quiver.Hom.op _ _ zero one right := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_right CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOp_right
@[simps functor inverse]
def walkingParallelPairOpEquiv : WalkingParallelPair ≌ WalkingParallelPairᵒᵖ where
functor := walkingParallelPairOp
inverse := walkingParallelPairOp.leftOp
unitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => eqToIso (by cases j <;> rfl))
(by rintro _ _ (_ | _ | _) <;> simp)
counitIso :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => eqToIso (by
induction' j with X
cases X <;> rfl))
(fun {i} {j} f => by
induction' i with i
induction' j with j
let g := f.unop
have : f = g.op := rfl
rw [this]
cases i <;> cases j <;> cases g <;> rfl)
functor_unitIso_comp := fun j => by cases j <;> rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOpEquiv
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_unitIso_zero :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.unitIso.app zero = Iso.refl zero := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_equiv_unit_iso_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_unitIso_zero
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_unitIso_one :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.unitIso.app one = Iso.refl one := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_equiv_unit_iso_one CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_unitIso_one
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_counitIso_zero :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.counitIso.app (op zero) = Iso.refl (op zero) := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_equiv_counit_iso_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_counitIso_zero
@[simp]
theorem walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_counitIso_one :
walkingParallelPairOpEquiv.counitIso.app (op one) = Iso.refl (op one) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_parallel_pair_op_equiv_counit_iso_one CategoryTheory.Limits.walkingParallelPairOpEquiv_counitIso_one
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y : C}
def parallelPair (f g : X ⟶ Y) : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C where
obj x :=
match x with
| zero => X
| one => Y
map h :=
match h with
| WalkingParallelPairHom.id _ => 𝟙 _
| left => f
| right => g
-- `sorry` can cope with this, but it's too slow:
map_comp := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨⟩ g <;> cases g <;> {dsimp; simp}
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_obj_zero (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).obj zero = X := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_obj_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair_obj_zero
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_obj_one (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).obj one = Y := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_obj_one CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair_obj_one
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_map_left (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).map left = f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_map_left CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair_map_left
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_map_right (f g : X ⟶ Y) : (parallelPair f g).map right = g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_map_right CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair_map_right
@[simp]
theorem parallelPair_functor_obj {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (j : WalkingParallelPair) :
(parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right)).obj j = F.obj j := by cases j <;> rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_functor_obj CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair_functor_obj
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoParallelPair (F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ parallelPair (F.map left) (F.map right) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => eqToIso <| by cases j <;> rfl) (by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_parallel_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoParallelPair
def parallelPairHom {X' Y' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⟶ X') (q : Y ⟶ Y')
(wf : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (wg : g ≫ q = p ≫ g') : parallelPair f g ⟶ parallelPair f' g' where
app j :=
match j with
| zero => p
| one => q
naturality := by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩ <;> {dsimp; simp [wf,wg]}
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPairHom
@[simp]
theorem parallelPairHom_app_zero {X' Y' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⟶ X')
(q : Y ⟶ Y') (wf : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (wg : g ≫ q = p ≫ g') :
(parallelPairHom f g f' g' p q wf wg).app zero = p :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPairHom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem parallelPairHom_app_one {X' Y' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⟶ X')
(q : Y ⟶ Y') (wf : f ≫ q = p ≫ f') (wg : g ≫ q = p ≫ g') :
(parallelPairHom f g f' g' p q wf wg).app one = q :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPairHom_app_one
@[simps!]
def parallelPair.ext {F G : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (zero : F.obj zero ≅ G.obj zero)
(one : F.obj one ≅ G.obj one) (left : F.map left ≫ one.hom = zero.hom ≫ G.map left)
(right : F.map right ≫ one.hom = zero.hom ≫ G.map right) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(by
rintro ⟨j⟩
exacts [zero, one])
(by rintro _ _ ⟨_⟩ <;> simp [left, right])
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair.ext
@[simps!]
def parallelPair.eqOfHomEq {f g f' g' : X ⟶ Y} (hf : f = f') (hg : g = g') :
parallelPair f g ≅ parallelPair f' g' :=
parallelPair.ext (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simp [hf]) (by simp [hg])
#align category_theory.limits.parallel_pair.eq_of_hom_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.parallelPair.eqOfHomEq
abbrev Fork (f g : X ⟶ Y) :=
Cone (parallelPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.fork CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork
abbrev Cofork (f g : X ⟶ Y) :=
Cocone (parallelPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.cofork CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork
variable {f g : X ⟶ Y}
def Fork.ι (t : Fork f g) :=
t.π.app zero
#align category_theory.limits.fork.ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ι
@[simp]
theorem Fork.app_zero_eq_ι (t : Fork f g) : t.π.app zero = t.ι :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.fork.app_zero_eq_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.app_zero_eq_ι
def Cofork.π (t : Cofork f g) :=
t.ι.app one
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.π CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.π
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.app_one_eq_π (t : Cofork f g) : t.ι.app one = t.π :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.app_one_eq_π CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.app_one_eq_π
@[simp]
theorem Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left (s : Fork f g) : s.π.app one = s.ι ≫ f := by
rw [← s.app_zero_eq_ι, ← s.w left, parallelPair_map_left]
#align category_theory.limits.fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left
@[reassoc]
theorem Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right (s : Fork f g) : s.π.app one = s.ι ≫ g := by
rw [← s.app_zero_eq_ι, ← s.w right, parallelPair_map_right]
#align category_theory.limits.fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left (s : Cofork f g) : s.ι.app zero = f ≫ s.π := by
rw [← s.app_one_eq_π, ← s.w left, parallelPair_map_left]
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left
@[reassoc]
theorem Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right (s : Cofork f g) : s.ι.app zero = g ≫ s.π := by
rw [← s.app_one_eq_π, ← s.w right, parallelPair_map_right]
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right
@[simps]
def Fork.ofι {P : C} (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) : Fork f g where
pt := P
π :=
{ app := fun X => by
cases X
· exact ι
· exact ι ≫ f
naturality := fun {X} {Y} f =>
by cases X <;> cases Y <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp; assumption }
#align category_theory.limits.fork.of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ofι
@[simps]
def Cofork.ofπ {P : C} (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = g ≫ π) : Cofork f g where
pt := P
ι :=
{ app := fun X => WalkingParallelPair.casesOn X (f ≫ π) π
naturality := fun i j f => by cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [w] }
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.of_π CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.ofπ
-- See note [dsimp, simp]
@[simp]
theorem Fork.ι_ofι {P : C} (ι : P ⟶ X) (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) : (Fork.ofι ι w).ι = ι :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.fork.ι_of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ι_ofι
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.π_ofπ {P : C} (π : Y ⟶ P) (w : f ≫ π = g ≫ π) : (Cofork.ofπ π w).π = π :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.π_of_π CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.π_ofπ
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Fork.condition (t : Fork f g) : t.ι ≫ f = t.ι ≫ g := by
rw [← t.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left, ← t.app_one_eq_ι_comp_right]
#align category_theory.limits.fork.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.condition
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Cofork.condition (t : Cofork f g) : f ≫ t.π = g ≫ t.π := by
rw [← t.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left, ← t.app_zero_eq_comp_π_right]
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.condition
theorem Fork.equalizer_ext (s : Fork f g) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ s.pt} (h : k ≫ s.ι = l ≫ s.ι) :
∀ j : WalkingParallelPair, k ≫ s.π.app j = l ≫ s.π.app j
| zero => h
| one => by
have : k ≫ ι s ≫ f = l ≫ ι s ≫ f := by
simp only [← Category.assoc]; exact congrArg (· ≫ f) h
rw [s.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left, this]
#align category_theory.limits.fork.equalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.equalizer_ext
theorem Cofork.coequalizer_ext (s : Cofork f g) {W : C} {k l : s.pt ⟶ W}
(h : Cofork.π s ≫ k = Cofork.π s ≫ l) : ∀ j : WalkingParallelPair, s.ι.app j ≫ k = s.ι.app j ≫ l
| zero => by simp only [s.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left, Category.assoc, h]
| one => h
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.coequalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.coequalizer_ext
theorem Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h : k ≫ Fork.ι s = l ≫ Fork.ι s) : k = l :=
hs.hom_ext <| Fork.equalizer_ext _ h
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} {k l : s.pt ⟶ W}
(h : Cofork.π s ≫ k = Cofork.π s ≫ l) : k = l :=
hs.hom_ext <| Cofork.coequalizer_ext _ h
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι {s t : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) : hs.lift t ≫ s.ι = t.ι :=
hs.fac _ _
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.lift_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc {s t : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) : s.π ≫ hs.desc t = t.π :=
hs.fac _ _
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.π_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc
-- Porting note: `Fork.IsLimit.lift` was added in order to ease the port
def Fork.IsLimit.lift {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
W ⟶ s.pt :=
hs.lift (Fork.ofι _ h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Fork.IsLimit.lift_ι' {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
Fork.IsLimit.lift hs k h ≫ Fork.ι s = k :=
hs.fac _ _
def Fork.IsLimit.lift' {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X) (h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
{ l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ Fork.ι s = k } :=
⟨Fork.IsLimit.lift hs k h, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.lift'
-- Porting note: `Cofork.IsColimit.desc` was added in order to ease the port
def Cofork.IsColimit.desc {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : s.pt ⟶ W :=
hs.desc (Cofork.ofπ _ h)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma Cofork.IsColimit.π_desc' {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : Cofork.π s ≫ Cofork.IsColimit.desc hs k h = k :=
hs.fac _ _
def Cofork.IsColimit.desc' {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // Cofork.π s ≫ l = k } :=
⟨Cofork.IsColimit.desc hs k h, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.desc'
theorem Fork.IsLimit.existsUnique {s : Fork f g} (hs : IsLimit s) {W : C} (k : W ⟶ X)
(h : k ≫ f = k ≫ g) : ∃! l : W ⟶ s.pt, l ≫ Fork.ι s = k :=
⟨hs.lift <| Fork.ofι _ h, hs.fac _ _, fun _ hm =>
Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext hs <| hm.symm ▸ (hs.fac (Fork.ofι _ h) WalkingParallelPair.zero).symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.existsUnique
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.existsUnique {s : Cofork f g} (hs : IsColimit s) {W : C} (k : Y ⟶ W)
(h : f ≫ k = g ≫ k) : ∃! d : s.pt ⟶ W, Cofork.π s ≫ d = k :=
⟨hs.desc <| Cofork.ofπ _ h, hs.fac _ _, fun _ hm =>
Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext hs <| hm.symm ▸ (hs.fac (Cofork.ofπ _ h) WalkingParallelPair.one).symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.existsUnique
@[simps]
def Fork.IsLimit.mk (t : Fork f g) (lift : ∀ s : Fork f g, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : Fork f g, lift s ≫ Fork.ι t = Fork.ι s)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Fork f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : m ≫ t.ι = s.ι), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j =>
WalkingParallelPair.casesOn j (fac s) <| by
erw [← s.w left, ← t.w left, ← Category.assoc, fac]; rfl
uniq := fun s m j => by aesop}
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.mk
def Fork.IsLimit.mk' {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (t : Fork f g)
(create : ∀ s : Fork f g, { l // l ≫ t.ι = s.ι ∧ ∀ {m}, m ≫ t.ι = s.ι → m = l }) : IsLimit t :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) fun s _ w => (create s).2.2 w
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.mk' CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.mk'
def Cofork.IsColimit.mk (t : Cofork f g) (desc : ∀ s : Cofork f g, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(fac : ∀ s : Cofork f g, Cofork.π t ≫ desc s = Cofork.π s)
(uniq : ∀ (s : Cofork f g) (m : t.pt ⟶ s.pt) (_ : t.π ≫ m = s.π), m = desc s) : IsColimit t :=
{ desc
fac := fun s j =>
WalkingParallelPair.casesOn j (by erw [← s.w left, ← t.w left, Category.assoc, fac]; rfl)
(fac s)
uniq := by aesop }
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.mk
def Cofork.IsColimit.mk' {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (t : Cofork f g)
(create : ∀ s : Cofork f g, { l : t.pt ⟶ s.pt // t.π ≫ l = s.π
∧ ∀ {m}, t.π ≫ m = s.π → m = l }) : IsColimit t :=
Cofork.IsColimit.mk t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) fun s _ w =>
(create s).2.2 w
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.mk' CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.mk'
noncomputable def Fork.IsLimit.ofExistsUnique {t : Fork f g}
(hs : ∀ s : Fork f g, ∃! l : s.pt ⟶ t.pt, l ≫ Fork.ι t = Fork.ι s) : IsLimit t := by
choose d hd hd' using hs
exact Fork.IsLimit.mk _ d hd fun s m hm => hd' _ _ hm
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.of_exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.ofExistsUnique
noncomputable def Cofork.IsColimit.ofExistsUnique {t : Cofork f g}
(hs : ∀ s : Cofork f g, ∃! d : t.pt ⟶ s.pt, Cofork.π t ≫ d = Cofork.π s) : IsColimit t := by
choose d hd hd' using hs
exact Cofork.IsColimit.mk _ d hd fun s m hm => hd' _ _ hm
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.of_exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.ofExistsUnique
@[simps]
def Fork.IsLimit.homIso {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Fork f g} (ht : IsLimit t) (Z : C) :
(Z ⟶ t.pt) ≃ { h : Z ⟶ X // h ≫ f = h ≫ g } where
toFun k := ⟨k ≫ t.ι, by simp only [Category.assoc, t.condition]⟩
invFun h := (Fork.IsLimit.lift' ht _ h.prop).1
left_inv k := Fork.IsLimit.hom_ext ht (Fork.IsLimit.lift' _ _ _).prop
right_inv h := Subtype.ext (Fork.IsLimit.lift' ht _ _).prop
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.homIso
theorem Fork.IsLimit.homIso_natural {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Fork f g} (ht : IsLimit t)
{Z Z' : C} (q : Z' ⟶ Z) (k : Z ⟶ t.pt) :
(Fork.IsLimit.homIso ht _ (q ≫ k) : Z' ⟶ X) = q ≫ (Fork.IsLimit.homIso ht _ k : Z ⟶ X) :=
Category.assoc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.fork.is_limit.hom_iso_natural CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.IsLimit.homIso_natural
@[simps]
def Cofork.IsColimit.homIso {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Cofork f g} (ht : IsColimit t) (Z : C) :
(t.pt ⟶ Z) ≃ { h : Y ⟶ Z // f ≫ h = g ≫ h } where
toFun k := ⟨t.π ≫ k, by simp only [← Category.assoc, t.condition]⟩
invFun h := (Cofork.IsColimit.desc' ht _ h.prop).1
left_inv k := Cofork.IsColimit.hom_ext ht (Cofork.IsColimit.desc' _ _ _).prop
right_inv h := Subtype.ext (Cofork.IsColimit.desc' ht _ _).prop
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.homIso
theorem Cofork.IsColimit.homIso_natural {X Y : C} {f g : X ⟶ Y} {t : Cofork f g} {Z Z' : C}
(q : Z ⟶ Z') (ht : IsColimit t) (k : t.pt ⟶ Z) :
(Cofork.IsColimit.homIso ht _ (k ≫ q) : Y ⟶ Z') =
(Cofork.IsColimit.homIso ht _ k : Y ⟶ Z) ≫ q :=
(Category.assoc _ _ _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.is_colimit.hom_iso_natural CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.IsColimit.homIso_natural
def Cone.ofFork {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Fork (F.map left) (F.map right)) : Cone F where
pt := t.pt
π :=
{ app := fun X => t.π.app X ≫ eqToHom (by aesop)
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp [t.condition]}}
#align category_theory.limits.cone.of_fork CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.ofFork
def Cocone.ofCofork {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cofork (F.map left) (F.map right)) :
Cocone F where
pt := t.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun X => eqToHom (by aesop) ≫ t.ι.app X
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp [t.condition]}}
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.of_cofork CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.ofCofork
@[simp]
theorem Cone.ofFork_π {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Fork (F.map left) (F.map right)) (j) :
(Cone.ofFork t).π.app j = t.π.app j ≫ eqToHom (by aesop) := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cone.of_fork_π CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.ofFork_π
@[simp]
theorem Cocone.ofCofork_ι {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cofork (F.map left) (F.map right))
(j) : (Cocone.ofCofork t).ι.app j = eqToHom (by aesop) ≫ t.ι.app j := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.of_cofork_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.ofCofork_ι
def Fork.ofCone {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) : Fork (F.map left) (F.map right) where
pt := t.pt
π := { app := fun X => t.π.app X ≫ eqToHom (by aesop)
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp}}
#align category_theory.limits.fork.of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ofCone
def Cofork.ofCocone {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
Cofork (F.map left) (F.map right) where
pt := t.pt
ι := { app := fun X => eqToHom (by aesop) ≫ t.ι.app X
naturality := by rintro _ _ (_|_|_) <;> {dsimp; simp}}
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.ofCocone
@[simp]
theorem Fork.ofCone_π {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) (j) :
(Fork.ofCone t).π.app j = t.π.app j ≫ eqToHom (by aesop) := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.fork.of_cone_π CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ofCone_π
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.ofCocone_ι {F : WalkingParallelPair ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) (j) :
(Cofork.ofCocone t).ι.app j = eqToHom (by aesop) ≫ t.ι.app j := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.of_cocone_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.ofCocone_ι
@[simp]
theorem Fork.ι_postcompose {f' g' : X ⟶ Y} {α : parallelPair f g ⟶ parallelPair f' g'}
{c : Fork f g} : Fork.ι ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) = c.ι ≫ α.app _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.fork.ι_postcompose CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ι_postcompose
@[simp]
theorem Cofork.π_precompose {f' g' : X ⟶ Y} {α : parallelPair f g ⟶ parallelPair f' g'}
{c : Cofork f' g'} : Cofork.π ((Cocones.precompose α).obj c) = α.app _ ≫ c.π :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.π_precompose CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.π_precompose
@[simps]
def Fork.mkHom {s t : Fork f g} (k : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (w : k ≫ t.ι = s.ι) : s ⟶ t where
hom := k
w := by
rintro ⟨_ | _⟩
· exact w
· simp only [Fork.app_one_eq_ι_comp_left,← Category.assoc]
congr
#align category_theory.limits.fork.mk_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.mkHom
@[simps]
def Fork.ext {s t : Fork f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w : i.hom ≫ t.ι = s.ι := by aesop_cat) :
s ≅ t where
hom := Fork.mkHom i.hom w
inv := Fork.mkHom i.inv (by rw [← w, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc])
#align category_theory.limits.fork.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.ext
def ForkOfι.ext {P : C} {ι ι' : P ⟶ X} (w : ι ≫ f = ι ≫ g) (w' : ι' ≫ f = ι' ≫ g) (h : ι = ι') :
Fork.ofι ι w ≅ Fork.ofι ι' w' :=
Fork.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp [h])
def Fork.isoForkOfι (c : Fork f g) : c ≅ Fork.ofι c.ι c.condition :=
Fork.ext (by simp only [Fork.ofι_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj]; rfl) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.fork.iso_fork_of_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.Fork.isoForkOfι
def Fork.isLimitOfIsos {X' Y' : C} (c : Fork f g) (hc : IsLimit c)
{f' g' : X' ⟶ Y'} (c' : Fork f' g')
(e₀ : X ≅ X') (e₁ : Y ≅ Y') (e : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(comm₁ : e₀.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ e₁.hom := by aesop_cat)
(comm₂ : e₀.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ e₁.hom := by aesop_cat)
(comm₃ : e.hom ≫ c'.ι = c.ι ≫ e₀.hom := by aesop_cat) : IsLimit c' :=
let i : parallelPair f g ≅ parallelPair f' g' := parallelPair.ext e₀ e₁ comm₁.symm comm₂.symm
(IsLimit.equivOfNatIsoOfIso i c c' (Fork.ext e comm₃)) hc
@[simps]
def Cofork.mkHom {s t : Cofork f g} (k : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (w : s.π ≫ k = t.π) : s ⟶ t where
hom := k
w := by
rintro ⟨_ | _⟩
· simp [Cofork.app_zero_eq_comp_π_left, w]
· exact w
#align category_theory.limits.cofork.mk_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.Cofork.mkHom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Equalizers.lean | 730 | 731 | theorem Fork.hom_comp_ι {s t : Fork f g} (f : s ⟶ t) : f.hom ≫ t.ι = s.ι := by |
cases s; cases t; cases f; aesop
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Alternating.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.determinant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c3019c79074b0619edb4b27553a91b2e82242395"
universe u v w z
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function
namespace Matrix
open Matrix
variable {m n : Type*} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R]
local notation "ε " σ:arg => ((sign σ : ℤ) : R)
def detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization ((MultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra R n R).compLinearMap LinearMap.proj)
#align matrix.det_row_alternating Matrix.detRowAlternating
abbrev det (M : Matrix n n R) : R :=
detRowAlternating M
#align matrix.det Matrix.det
theorem det_apply (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • ∏ i, M (σ i) i :=
MultilinearMap.alternatization_apply _ M
#align matrix.det_apply Matrix.det_apply
-- This is what the old definition was. We use it to avoid having to change the old proofs below
theorem det_apply' (M : Matrix n n R) : M.det = ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) i := by
simp [det_apply, Units.smul_def]
#align matrix.det_apply' Matrix.det_apply'
@[simp]
theorem det_diagonal {d : n → R} : det (diagonal d) = ∏ i, d i := by
rw [det_apply']
refine (Finset.sum_eq_single 1 ?_ ?_).trans ?_
· rintro σ - h2
cases' not_forall.1 (mt Equiv.ext h2) with x h3
convert mul_zero (ε σ)
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (mem_univ x)
exact if_neg h3
· simp
· simp
#align matrix.det_diagonal Matrix.det_diagonal
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem det_zero (_ : Nonempty n) : det (0 : Matrix n n R) = 0 :=
(detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_zero
#align matrix.det_zero Matrix.det_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_one : det (1 : Matrix n n R) = 1 := by rw [← diagonal_one]; simp [-diagonal_one]
#align matrix.det_one Matrix.det_one
theorem det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] {A : Matrix n n R} : det A = 1 := by simp [det_apply]
#align matrix.det_is_empty Matrix.det_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem coe_det_isEmpty [IsEmpty n] : (det : Matrix n n R → R) = Function.const _ 1 := by
ext
exact det_isEmpty
#align matrix.coe_det_is_empty Matrix.coe_det_isEmpty
theorem det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 0) : det A = 1 :=
haveI : IsEmpty n := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h
det_isEmpty
#align matrix.det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero Matrix.det_eq_one_of_card_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem det_unique {n : Type*} [Unique n] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n] (A : Matrix n n R) :
det A = A default default := by simp [det_apply, univ_unique]
#align matrix.det_unique Matrix.det_unique
theorem det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n R) (k : n) :
det A = A k k := by
have := uniqueOfSubsingleton k
convert det_unique A
#align matrix.det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton Matrix.det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton
theorem det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one {A : Matrix n n R} (h : Fintype.card n = 1) (k : n) :
det A = A k k :=
haveI : Subsingleton n := Fintype.card_le_one_iff_subsingleton.mp h.le
det_eq_elem_of_subsingleton _ _
#align matrix.det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one Matrix.det_eq_elem_of_card_eq_one
theorem det_mul_aux {M N : Matrix n n R} {p : n → n} (H : ¬Bijective p) :
(∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ x, M (σ x) (p x) * N (p x) x) = 0 := by
obtain ⟨i, j, hpij, hij⟩ : ∃ i j, p i = p j ∧ i ≠ j := by
rw [← Finite.injective_iff_bijective, Injective] at H
push_neg at H
exact H
exact
sum_involution (fun σ _ => σ * Equiv.swap i j)
(fun σ _ => by
have : (∏ x, M (σ x) (p x)) = ∏ x, M ((σ * Equiv.swap i j) x) (p x) :=
Fintype.prod_equiv (swap i j) _ _ (by simp [apply_swap_eq_self hpij])
simp [this, sign_swap hij, -sign_swap', prod_mul_distrib])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr mul_swap_eq_iff).mpr hij) (fun _ _ => mem_univ _) fun σ _ =>
mul_swap_involutive i j σ
#align matrix.det_mul_aux Matrix.det_mul_aux
@[simp]
theorem det_mul (M N : Matrix n n R) : det (M * N) = det M * det N :=
calc
det (M * N) = ∑ p : n → n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i := by
simp only [det_apply', mul_apply, prod_univ_sum, mul_sum, Fintype.piFinset_univ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
_ =
∑ p ∈ (@univ (n → n) _).filter Bijective,
∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (p i) * N (p i) i :=
(Eq.symm <|
sum_subset (filter_subset _ _) fun f _ hbij =>
det_mul_aux <| by simpa only [true_and_iff, mem_filter, mem_univ] using hbij)
_ = ∑ τ : Perm n, ∑ σ : Perm n, ε σ * ∏ i, M (σ i) (τ i) * N (τ i) i :=
sum_bij (fun p h ↦ Equiv.ofBijective p (mem_filter.1 h).2) (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _)
(fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ by injection h)
(fun b _ ↦ ⟨b, mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_univ _, b.bijective⟩, coe_fn_injective rfl⟩) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * ε τ * ∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j) := by
simp only [mul_comm, mul_left_comm, prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
_ = ∑ σ : Perm n, ∑ τ : Perm n, (∏ i, N (σ i) i) * (ε σ * ε τ) * ∏ i, M (τ i) i :=
(sum_congr rfl fun σ _ =>
Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.mulRight σ⁻¹) _ _ fun τ => by
have : (∏ j, M (τ j) (σ j)) = ∏ j, M ((τ * σ⁻¹) j) j := by
rw [← (σ⁻¹ : _ ≃ _).prod_comp]
simp only [Equiv.Perm.coe_mul, apply_inv_self, Function.comp_apply]
have h : ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε τ :=
calc
ε σ * ε (τ * σ⁻¹) = ε (τ * σ⁻¹ * σ) := by
rw [mul_comm, sign_mul (τ * σ⁻¹)]
simp only [Int.cast_mul, Units.val_mul]
_ = ε τ := by simp only [inv_mul_cancel_right]
simp_rw [Equiv.coe_mulRight, h]
simp only [this])
_ = det M * det N := by
simp only [det_apply', Finset.mul_sum, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
#align matrix.det_mul Matrix.det_mul
def detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R →* R where
toFun := det
map_one' := det_one
map_mul' := det_mul
#align matrix.det_monoid_hom Matrix.detMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_detMonoidHom : (detMonoidHom : Matrix n n R → R) = det :=
rfl
#align matrix.coe_det_monoid_hom Matrix.coe_detMonoidHom
theorem det_mul_comm (M N : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N) = det (N * M) := by
rw [det_mul, det_mul, mul_comm]
#align matrix.det_mul_comm Matrix.det_mul_comm
theorem det_mul_left_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * (N * P)) = det (N * (M * P)) := by
rw [← Matrix.mul_assoc, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm M N, ← det_mul]
#align matrix.det_mul_left_comm Matrix.det_mul_left_comm
theorem det_mul_right_comm (M N P : Matrix m m R) : det (M * N * P) = det (M * P * N) := by
rw [Matrix.mul_assoc, Matrix.mul_assoc, det_mul, det_mul_comm N P, ← det_mul]
#align matrix.det_mul_right_comm Matrix.det_mul_right_comm
-- TODO(mathlib4#6607): fix elaboration so that the ascription isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det ((M : Matrix _ _ _) * N * (↑M⁻¹ : Matrix _ _ _)) = det N := by
rw [det_mul_right_comm, Units.mul_inv, one_mul]
#align matrix.det_units_conj Matrix.det_units_conj
-- TODO(mathlib4#6607): fix elaboration so that the ascription isn't needed
theorem det_units_conj' (M : (Matrix m m R)ˣ) (N : Matrix m m R) :
det ((↑M⁻¹ : Matrix _ _ _) * N * (↑M : Matrix _ _ _)) = det N :=
det_units_conj M⁻¹ N
#align matrix.det_units_conj' Matrix.det_units_conj'
@[simp]
theorem det_transpose (M : Matrix n n R) : Mᵀ.det = M.det := by
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
refine Fintype.sum_bijective _ inv_involutive.bijective _ _ ?_
intro σ
rw [sign_inv]
congr 1
apply Fintype.prod_equiv σ
intros
simp
#align matrix.det_transpose Matrix.det_transpose
theorem det_permute (σ : Perm n) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M.submatrix σ id).det = Perm.sign σ * M.det :=
((detRowAlternating : (n → R) [⋀^n]→ₗ[R] R).map_perm M σ).trans (by simp [Units.smul_def])
#align matrix.det_permute Matrix.det_permute
theorem det_permute' (σ : Perm n) (M : Matrix n n R) :
(M.submatrix id σ).det = Perm.sign σ * M.det := by
rw [← det_transpose, transpose_submatrix, det_permute, det_transpose]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Determinant/Basic.lean | 246 | 255 | theorem det_submatrix_equiv_self (e : n ≃ m) (A : Matrix m m R) :
det (A.submatrix e e) = det A := by |
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
apply Fintype.sum_equiv (Equiv.permCongr e)
intro σ
rw [Equiv.Perm.sign_permCongr e σ]
congr 1
apply Fintype.prod_equiv e
intro i
rw [Equiv.permCongr_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, submatrix_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 435 | 440 | theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by |
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
|
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
#align_import data.multiset.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b2c89893177f66a48daf993b7ba5ef7cddeff8c9"
namespace Multiset
section Pi
variable {α : Type*}
open Function
def Pi.empty (δ : α → Sort*) : ∀ a ∈ (0 : Multiset α), δ a :=
nofun
#align multiset.pi.empty Multiset.Pi.empty
universe u v
variable [DecidableEq α] {β : α → Type u} {δ : α → Sort v}
def Pi.cons (m : Multiset α) (a : α) (b : δ a) (f : ∀ a ∈ m, δ a) : ∀ a' ∈ a ::ₘ m, δ a' :=
fun a' ha' => if h : a' = a then Eq.ndrec b h.symm else f a' <| (mem_cons.1 ha').resolve_left h
#align multiset.pi.cons Multiset.Pi.cons
theorem Pi.cons_same {m : Multiset α} {a : α} {b : δ a} {f : ∀ a ∈ m, δ a} (h : a ∈ a ::ₘ m) :
Pi.cons m a b f a h = b :=
dif_pos rfl
#align multiset.pi.cons_same Multiset.Pi.cons_same
theorem Pi.cons_ne {m : Multiset α} {a a' : α} {b : δ a} {f : ∀ a ∈ m, δ a} (h' : a' ∈ a ::ₘ m)
(h : a' ≠ a) : Pi.cons m a b f a' h' = f a' ((mem_cons.1 h').resolve_left h) :=
dif_neg h
#align multiset.pi.cons_ne Multiset.Pi.cons_ne
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Pi.lean | 49 | 58 | theorem Pi.cons_swap {a a' : α} {b : δ a} {b' : δ a'} {m : Multiset α} {f : ∀ a ∈ m, δ a}
(h : a ≠ a') : HEq (Pi.cons (a' ::ₘ m) a b (Pi.cons m a' b' f))
(Pi.cons (a ::ₘ m) a' b' (Pi.cons m a b f)) := by |
apply hfunext rfl
simp only [heq_iff_eq]
rintro a'' _ rfl
refine hfunext (by rw [Multiset.cons_swap]) fun ha₁ ha₂ _ => ?_
rcases ne_or_eq a'' a with (h₁ | rfl)
on_goal 1 => rcases eq_or_ne a'' a' with (rfl | h₂)
all_goals simp [*, Pi.cons_same, Pi.cons_ne]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RieszLemma
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
#align_import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9425b6f8220e53b059f5a4904786c3c4b50fc057"
universe u v w x
noncomputable section
open Set FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace Filter Asymptotics Classical Topology
NNReal Metric
section CompleteField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type x}
[AddCommGroup F'] [Module 𝕜 F'] [TopologicalSpace F'] [TopologicalAddGroup F']
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => f.det := by
change Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E)
-- Porting note: this could be easier with `det_cases`
by_cases h : ∃ s : Finset E, Nonempty (Basis (↥s) 𝕜 E)
· rcases h with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
simp_rw [LinearMap.det_eq_det_toMatrix_of_finset b]
refine Continuous.matrix_det ?_
exact
((LinearMap.toMatrix b b).toLinearMap.comp
(ContinuousLinearMap.coeLM 𝕜)).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
· -- Porting note: was `unfold LinearMap.det`
rw [LinearMap.det_def]
simpa only [h, MonoidHom.one_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff] using continuous_const
#align continuous_linear_map.continuous_det ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det
irreducible_def lipschitzExtensionConstant (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : ℝ≥0 :=
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
max (‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊) 1
#align lipschitz_extension_constant lipschitzExtensionConstant
theorem lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : 0 < lipschitzExtensionConstant E' := by
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant]
exact zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _)
#align lipschitz_extension_constant_pos lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos
theorem LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] {s : Set α} {f : α → E'}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) :
∃ g : α → E', LipschitzWith (lipschitzExtensionConstant E' * K) g ∧ EqOn f g s := by
let ι : Type _ := Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex ℝ E'
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
have LA : LipschitzWith ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A := by apply A.lipschitz
have L : LipschitzOnWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) (A ∘ f) s :=
LA.comp_lipschitzOnWith hf
obtain ⟨g, hg, gs⟩ :
∃ g : α → ι → ℝ, LipschitzWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) g ∧ EqOn (A ∘ f) g s :=
L.extend_pi
refine ⟨A.symm ∘ g, ?_, ?_⟩
· have LAsymm : LipschitzWith ‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A.symm := by
apply A.symm.lipschitz
apply (LAsymm.comp hg).weaken
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant, ← mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) le_rfl
· intro x hx
have : A (f x) = g x := gs hx
simp only [(· ∘ ·), ← this, A.symm_apply_apply]
#align lipschitz_on_with.extend_finite_dimension LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension
theorem LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) : ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial E
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, AntilipschitzWith.of_subsingleton⟩
· rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot] at hf
let e : E ≃L[𝕜] LinearMap.range f := (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
exact ⟨_, e.nnnorm_symm_pos, e.antilipschitz⟩
#align linear_map.exists_antilipschitz_with LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith
open Function in
theorem LinearMap.injective_iff_antilipschitz [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
Injective f ↔ ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
constructor
· rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
exact f.exists_antilipschitzWith
· rintro ⟨K, -, H⟩
exact H.injective
open Function in
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.isOpen_injective [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] :
IsOpen { L : E →L[𝕜] F | Injective L } := by
rw [isOpen_iff_eventually]
rintro φ₀ hφ₀
rcases φ₀.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mp hφ₀ with ⟨K, K_pos, H⟩
have : ∀ᶠ φ in 𝓝 φ₀, ‖φ - φ₀‖₊ < K⁻¹ := eventually_nnnorm_sub_lt _ <| inv_pos_of_pos K_pos
filter_upwards [this] with φ hφ
apply φ.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mpr
exact ⟨(K⁻¹ - ‖φ - φ₀‖₊)⁻¹, inv_pos_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt hφ),
H.add_sub_lipschitzWith (φ - φ₀).lipschitz hφ⟩
protected theorem LinearIndependent.eventually {ι} [Finite ι] {f : ι → E}
(hf : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) : ∀ᶠ g in 𝓝 f, LinearIndependent 𝕜 g := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
simp only [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff'] at hf ⊢
rcases LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith _ hf with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
have : Tendsto (fun g : ι → E => ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖) (𝓝 f) (𝓝 <| ∑ i, ‖f i - f i‖) :=
tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ =>
Tendsto.norm <| ((continuous_apply i).tendsto _).sub tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [sub_self, norm_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero] at this
refine (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds <| inv_pos.2 K0)).mono fun g hg => ?_
replace hg : ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖₊ < K⁻¹ := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe]
push_cast
exact hg
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
refine (hK.add_sub_lipschitzWith (LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun v u => ?_) hg).injective
simp only [dist_eq_norm, LinearMap.lsum_apply, Pi.sub_apply, LinearMap.sum_apply,
LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.proj_apply, LinearMap.smulRight_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, ←
Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, ← sub_smul, NNReal.coe_sum, coe_nnnorm, Finset.sum_mul]
refine norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun i _ => ?_
rw [norm_smul, mul_comm]
gcongr
exact norm_le_pi_norm (v - u) i
#align linear_independent.eventually LinearIndependent.eventually
theorem isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
IsOpen { f : ι → E | LinearIndependent 𝕜 f } :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun _ => LinearIndependent.eventually
#align is_open_set_of_linear_independent isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent
theorem isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank (n : ℕ) :
IsOpen { f : E →L[𝕜] F | ↑n ≤ (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).rank } := by
simp only [LinearMap.le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset, setOf_exists, ← exists_prop]
refine isOpen_biUnion fun t _ => ?_
have : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] F => fun x : (t : Set E) => f x :=
continuous_pi fun x => (ContinuousLinearMap.apply 𝕜 F (x : E)).continuous
exact isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent.preimage this
#align is_open_set_of_nat_le_rank isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank
theorem Basis.opNNNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} (M : ℝ≥0)
(hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖₊ ≤ M) : ‖u‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * M :=
u.opNNNorm_le_bound _ fun e => by
set φ := v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap
calc
‖u e‖₊ = ‖u (∑ i, v.equivFun e i • v i)‖₊ := by rw [v.sum_equivFun]
_ = ‖∑ i, v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := by simp [map_sum, LinearMap.map_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := nnnorm_sum_le _ _
_ = ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * ‖u (v i)‖₊ := by simp only [nnnorm_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * M := by gcongr; apply hu
_ = (∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊) * M := by rw [Finset.sum_mul]
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) * M := by
gcongr
calc
∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖φ e‖₊ := Pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm _
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) := nsmul_le_nsmul_right (φ.le_opNNNorm e) _
_ = Fintype.card ι • ‖φ‖₊ * M * ‖e‖₊ := by simp only [smul_mul_assoc, mul_right_comm]
#align basis.op_nnnorm_le Basis.opNNNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.op_nnnorm_le := Basis.opNNNorm_le
theorem Basis.opNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}
(hM : 0 ≤ M) (hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖ ≤ M) :
‖u‖ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖ * M := by
simpa using NNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr (v.opNNNorm_le ⟨M, hM⟩ hu)
#align basis.op_norm_le Basis.opNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.op_norm_le := Basis.opNorm_le
theorem Basis.exists_opNNNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
∃ C > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ {u : E →L[𝕜] F} (M : ℝ≥0), (∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖₊ ≤ M) → ‖u‖₊ ≤ C * M := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
exact
⟨max (Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊) 1,
zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), fun {u} M hu =>
(v.opNNNorm_le M hu).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) (zero_le M)⟩
#align basis.exists_op_nnnorm_le Basis.exists_opNNNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.exists_op_nnnorm_le := Basis.exists_opNNNorm_le
theorem Basis.exists_opNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) :
∃ C > (0 : ℝ), ∀ {u : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}, 0 ≤ M → (∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖ ≤ M) → ‖u‖ ≤ C * M := by
obtain ⟨C, hC, h⟩ := v.exists_opNNNorm_le (F := F)
-- Porting note: used `Subtype.forall'` below
refine ⟨C, hC, ?_⟩
intro u M hM H
simpa using h ⟨M, hM⟩ H
#align basis.exists_op_norm_le Basis.exists_opNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.exists_op_norm_le := Basis.exists_opNorm_le
instance [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] [SecondCountableTopology F] :
SecondCountableTopology (E →L[𝕜] F) := by
set d := FiniteDimensional.finrank 𝕜 E
suffices
∀ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ n : (E →L[𝕜] F) → Fin d → ℕ, ∀ f g : E →L[𝕜] F, n f = n g → dist f g ≤ ε from
Metric.secondCountable_of_countable_discretization fun ε ε_pos =>
⟨Fin d → ℕ, by infer_instance, this ε ε_pos⟩
intro ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨u : ℕ → F, hu : DenseRange u⟩ := exists_dense_seq F
let v := FiniteDimensional.finBasis 𝕜 E
obtain
⟨C : ℝ, C_pos : 0 < C, hC :
∀ {φ : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}, 0 ≤ M → (∀ i, ‖φ (v i)‖ ≤ M) → ‖φ‖ ≤ C * M⟩ :=
v.exists_opNorm_le (E := E) (F := F)
have h_2C : 0 < 2 * C := mul_pos zero_lt_two C_pos
have hε2C : 0 < ε / (2 * C) := div_pos ε_pos h_2C
have : ∀ φ : E →L[𝕜] F, ∃ n : Fin d → ℕ, ‖φ - (v.constrL <| u ∘ n)‖ ≤ ε / 2 := by
intro φ
have : ∀ i, ∃ n, ‖φ (v i) - u n‖ ≤ ε / (2 * C) := by
simp only [norm_sub_rev]
intro i
have : φ (v i) ∈ closure (range u) := hu _
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ‖u n - φ (v i)‖ < ε / (2 * C) := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis Metric.nhds_basis_ball] at this
specialize this (ε / (2 * C)) hε2C
simpa [dist_eq_norm]
exact ⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩
choose n hn using this
use n
replace hn : ∀ i : Fin d, ‖(φ - (v.constrL <| u ∘ n)) (v i)‖ ≤ ε / (2 * C) := by simp [hn]
have : C * (ε / (2 * C)) = ε / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt h_2C)]
specialize hC (le_of_lt hε2C) hn
rwa [this] at hC
choose n hn using this
set Φ := fun φ : E →L[𝕜] F => v.constrL <| u ∘ n φ
change ∀ z, dist z (Φ z) ≤ ε / 2 at hn
use n
intro x y hxy
calc
dist x y ≤ dist x (Φ x) + dist (Φ x) y := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist x (Φ x) + dist y (Φ y) := by simp [Φ, hxy, dist_comm]
_ ≤ ε := by linarith [hn x, hn y]
theorem AffineSubspace.closed_of_finiteDimensional {P : Type*} [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor E P] (s : AffineSubspace 𝕜 P) [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 s.direction] :
IsClosed (s : Set P) :=
s.isClosed_direction_iff.mp s.direction.closed_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_subspace.closed_of_finite_dimensional AffineSubspace.closed_of_finiteDimensional
section Riesz
theorem exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {R : ℝ} (hR : ‖c‖ < R)
(h : ¬FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E) (s : Finset E) : ∃ x : E, ‖x‖ ≤ R ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, 1 ≤ ‖y - x‖ := by
let F := Submodule.span 𝕜 (s : Set E)
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F :=
Module.finite_def.2
((Submodule.fg_top _).2 (Submodule.fg_def.2 ⟨s, Finset.finite_toSet _, rfl⟩))
have Fclosed : IsClosed (F : Set E) := Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional _
have : ∃ x, x ∉ F := by
contrapose! h
have : (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) = F := by
ext x
simp [h]
have : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) := by rwa [this]
exact Module.finite_def.2 ((Submodule.fg_top _).1 (Module.finite_def.1 this))
obtain ⟨x, xR, hx⟩ : ∃ x : E, ‖x‖ ≤ R ∧ ∀ y : E, y ∈ F → 1 ≤ ‖x - y‖ :=
riesz_lemma_of_norm_lt hc hR Fclosed this
have hx' : ∀ y : E, y ∈ F → 1 ≤ ‖y - x‖ := by
intro y hy
rw [← norm_neg]
simpa using hx y hy
exact ⟨x, xR, fun y hy => hx' _ (Submodule.subset_span hy)⟩
#align exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset
theorem exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub' {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖) {R : ℝ} (hR : ‖c‖ < R)
(h : ¬FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E) :
∃ f : ℕ → E, (∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ R) ∧ Pairwise fun m n => 1 ≤ ‖f m - f n‖ := by
have : IsSymm E fun x y : E => 1 ≤ ‖x - y‖ := by
constructor
intro x y hxy
rw [← norm_neg]
simpa
apply
exists_seq_of_forall_finset_exists' (fun x : E => ‖x‖ ≤ R) fun (x : E) (y : E) => 1 ≤ ‖x - y‖
rintro s -
exact exists_norm_le_le_norm_sub_of_finset hc hR h s
#align exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub' exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub'
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/FiniteDimension.lean | 444 | 449 | theorem exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub (h : ¬FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E) :
∃ (R : ℝ) (f : ℕ → E), 1 < R ∧ (∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ R) ∧ Pairwise fun m n => 1 ≤ ‖f m - f n‖ := by |
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ : ∃ c : 𝕜, 1 < ‖c‖ := NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜
have A : ‖c‖ < ‖c‖ + 1 := by linarith
rcases exists_seq_norm_le_one_le_norm_sub' hc A h with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨‖c‖ + 1, f, hc.trans A, hf.1, hf.2⟩
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.Presheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
#align_import algebraic_geometry.presheafed_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
open Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor TopCat TopologicalSpace
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.auto_cases_opens
-- We would replace this by:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opens
-- although it doesn't appear to help in this file, in any case.
-- Porting note: we used to have:
-- local attribute [tidy] tactic.op_induction'
-- A possible replacement would be:
-- attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Opposite
-- but this would probably require https://github.com/JLimperg/aesop/issues/59
-- In any case, it doesn't seem necessary here.
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
-- Porting note: `PresheafSpace.{w} C` is the type of topological spaces in `Type w` equipped
-- with a presheaf with values in `C`; then there is a total of three universe parameters
-- in `PresheafSpace.{w, v, u} C`, where `C : Type u` and `Category.{v} C`.
-- In mathlib3, some definitions in this file unnecessarily assumed `w=v`. This restriction
-- has been removed.
structure PresheafedSpace where
carrier : TopCat
protected presheaf : carrier.Presheaf C
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace
variable {C}
namespace PresheafedSpace
-- Porting note: using `Coe` here triggers an error, `CoeOut` seems an acceptable alternative
instance coeCarrier : CoeOut (PresheafedSpace C) TopCat where coe X := X.carrier
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.coe_carrier AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.coeCarrier
attribute [coe] PresheafedSpace.carrier
-- Porting note: we add this instance, as Lean does not reliably use the `CoeOut` instance above
-- in downstream files.
instance : CoeSort (PresheafedSpace C) Type* where coe := fun X => X.carrier
-- Porting note: the following lemma is removed because it is a syntactic tauto
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#noalign algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.as_coe
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the `simpVarHead` linter complains
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_coe (carrier) (presheaf) :
(({ carrier
presheaf } : PresheafedSpace C) : TopCat) = carrier :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.mk_coe AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.mk_coe
instance (X : PresheafedSpace C) : TopologicalSpace X :=
X.carrier.str
def const (X : TopCat) (Z : C) : PresheafedSpace C where
carrier := X
presheaf := (Functor.const _).obj Z
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.const AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.const
instance [Inhabited C] : Inhabited (PresheafedSpace C) :=
⟨const (TopCat.of PEmpty) default⟩
structure Hom (X Y : PresheafedSpace C) where
base : (X : TopCat) ⟶ (Y : TopCat)
c : Y.presheaf ⟶ base _* X.presheaf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.hom AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom
-- Porting note: eventually, the ext lemma shall be applied to terms in `X ⟶ Y`
-- rather than `Hom X Y`, this one was renamed `Hom.ext` instead of `ext`,
-- and the more practical lemma `ext` is defined just after the definition
-- of the `Category` instance
@[ext]
theorem Hom.ext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : Hom X Y) (w : α.base = β.base)
(h : α.c ≫ whiskerRight (eqToHom (by rw [w])) _ = β.c) : α = β := by
rcases α with ⟨base, c⟩
rcases β with ⟨base', c'⟩
dsimp at w
subst w
dsimp at h
erw [whiskerRight_id', comp_id] at h
subst h
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.ext AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext
-- TODO including `injections` would make tidy work earlier.
theorem hext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : Hom X Y) (w : α.base = β.base) (h : HEq α.c β.c) :
α = β := by
cases α
cases β
congr
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.hext AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.hext
-- Porting note: `eqToHom` is no longer necessary in the definition of `c`
def id (X : PresheafedSpace C) : Hom X X where
base := 𝟙 (X : TopCat)
c := 𝟙 _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.id AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.id
instance homInhabited (X : PresheafedSpace C) : Inhabited (Hom X X) :=
⟨id X⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.hom_inhabited AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.homInhabited
def comp {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : Hom X Y) (β : Hom Y Z) : Hom X Z where
base := α.base ≫ β.base
c := β.c ≫ (Presheaf.pushforward _ β.base).map α.c
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.comp AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp
theorem comp_c {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : Hom X Y) (β : Hom Y Z) :
(comp α β).c = β.c ≫ (Presheaf.pushforward _ β.base).map α.c :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c
variable (C)
section
attribute [local simp] id comp
-- Porting note: in mathlib3, `tidy` could (almost) prove the category axioms, but proofs
-- were included because `tidy` was slow. Here, `aesop_cat` succeeds reasonably quickly
-- for `comp_id` and `assoc`
instance categoryOfPresheafedSpaces : Category (PresheafedSpace C) where
Hom := Hom
id := id
comp := comp
id_comp _ := by
dsimp
ext
· dsimp
simp
· dsimp
simp only [map_id, whiskerRight_id', assoc]
erw [comp_id, comp_id]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.category_of_PresheafedSpaces AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.categoryOfPresheafedSpaces
variable {C}
-- Porting note: adding an ext lemma.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5229
@[ext]
theorem ext {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (α β : X ⟶ Y) (w : α.base = β.base)
(h : α.c ≫ whiskerRight (eqToHom (by rw [w])) _ = β.c) : α = β :=
Hom.ext α β w h
end
variable {C}
attribute [local simp] eqToHom_map
@[simp]
theorem id_base (X : PresheafedSpace C) : (𝟙 X : X ⟶ X).base = 𝟙 (X : TopCat) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.id_base AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.id_base
-- Porting note: `eqToHom` is no longer needed in the statements of `id_c` and `id_c_app`
theorem id_c (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
(𝟙 X : X ⟶ X).c = 𝟙 X.presheaf :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.id_c AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.id_c
@[simp]
theorem id_c_app (X : PresheafedSpace C) (U) :
(𝟙 X : X ⟶ X).c.app U = X.presheaf.map (𝟙 U) := by
rw [id_c, map_id]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.id_c_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.id_c_app
@[simp]
theorem comp_base {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(f ≫ g).base = f.base ≫ g.base :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_base AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_base
instance (X Y : PresheafedSpace C) : CoeFun (X ⟶ Y) fun _ => (↑X → ↑Y) :=
⟨fun f => f.base⟩
-- Porting note: removed as this is a syntactic tauto
--theorem coe_to_fun_eq {X Y : PresheafedSpace.{v, v, u} C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : (f : ↑X → ↑Y) = f.base :=
-- rfl
#noalign algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.coe_to_fun_eq
-- The `reassoc` attribute was added despite the LHS not being a composition of two homs,
-- for the reasons explained in the docstring.
-- Porting note: as there is no composition in the LHS it is purposely `@[reassoc, simp]` rather
-- than `@[reassoc (attr := simp)]`
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_c_app {X Y Z : PresheafedSpace C} (α : X ⟶ Y) (β : Y ⟶ Z) (U) :
(α ≫ β).c.app U = β.c.app U ≫ α.c.app (op ((Opens.map β.base).obj (unop U))) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app
theorem congr_app {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} {α β : X ⟶ Y} (h : α = β) (U) :
α.c.app U = β.c.app U ≫ X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by subst h; rfl)) := by
subst h
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.congr_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.congr_app
section
variable (C)
@[simps]
def forget : PresheafedSpace C ⥤ TopCat where
obj X := (X : TopCat)
map f := f.base
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.forget AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.forget
end
section Restrict
@[simps]
def restrict {U : TopCat} (X : PresheafedSpace C) {f : U ⟶ (X : TopCat)}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) : PresheafedSpace C where
carrier := U
presheaf := h.isOpenMap.functor.op ⋙ X.presheaf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.restrict
@[simps]
def ofRestrict {U : TopCat} (X : PresheafedSpace C) {f : U ⟶ (X : TopCat)}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) : X.restrict h ⟶ X where
base := f
c :=
{ app := fun V => X.presheaf.map (h.isOpenMap.adjunction.counit.app V.unop).op
naturality := fun U V f =>
show _ = _ ≫ X.presheaf.map _ by
rw [← map_comp, ← map_comp]
rfl }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.of_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.ofRestrict
instance ofRestrict_mono {U : TopCat} (X : PresheafedSpace C) (f : U ⟶ X.1) (hf : OpenEmbedding f) :
Mono (X.ofRestrict hf) := by
haveI : Mono f := (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mpr hf.inj
constructor
intro Z g₁ g₂ eq
ext1
· have := congr_arg PresheafedSpace.Hom.base eq
simp only [PresheafedSpace.comp_base, PresheafedSpace.ofRestrict_base] at this
rw [cancel_mono] at this
exact this
· ext V
have hV : (Opens.map (X.ofRestrict hf).base).obj (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj V) = V := by
ext1
exact Set.preimage_image_eq _ hf.inj
haveI :
IsIso (hf.isOpenMap.adjunction.counit.app (unop (op (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj V)))) :=
NatIso.isIso_app_of_isIso
(whiskerLeft hf.isOpenMap.functor hf.isOpenMap.adjunction.counit) V
have := PresheafedSpace.congr_app eq (op (hf.isOpenMap.functor.obj V))
simp only [PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, PresheafedSpace.ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc,
cancel_epi] at this
have h : _ ≫ _ = _ ≫ _ ≫ _ :=
congr_arg (fun f => (X.restrict hf).presheaf.map (eqToHom hV).op ≫ f) this
erw [g₁.c.naturality, g₂.c.naturality_assoc] at h
simp only [Presheaf.pushforwardObj_map, eqToHom_op, Category.assoc, eqToHom_map,
eqToHom_trans] at h
rw [← IsIso.comp_inv_eq, inv_eqToHom, Category.assoc, eqToHom_trans] at h
rw [NatTrans.comp_app]
simpa using h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.of_restrict_mono AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.ofRestrict_mono
theorem restrict_top_presheaf (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
(X.restrict (Opens.openEmbedding ⊤)).presheaf =
(Opens.inclusionTopIso X.carrier).inv _* X.presheaf := by
dsimp
rw [Opens.inclusion_top_functor X.carrier]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.restrict_top_presheaf AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.restrict_top_presheaf
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/PresheafedSpace.lean | 422 | 435 | theorem ofRestrict_top_c (X : PresheafedSpace C) :
(X.ofRestrict (Opens.openEmbedding ⊤)).c =
eqToHom
(by
rw [restrict_top_presheaf, ← Presheaf.Pushforward.comp_eq]
erw [Iso.inv_hom_id]
rw [Presheaf.Pushforward.id_eq]) := by |
/- another approach would be to prove the left hand side
is a natural isomorphism, but I encountered a universe
issue when `apply NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app`. -/
ext
dsimp [ofRestrict]
erw [eqToHom_map, eqToHom_app]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.pochhammer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"53b216bcc1146df1c4a0a86877890ea9f1f01589"
universe u v
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
section Ring
variable (R : Type u) [Ring R]
noncomputable def descPochhammer : ℕ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (descPochhammer n).comp (X - 1)
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_zero : descPochhammer R 0 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_one : descPochhammer R 1 = X := by simp [descPochhammer]
theorem descPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
descPochhammer R (n + 1) = X * (descPochhammer R n).comp (X - 1) := by
rw [descPochhammer]
theorem monic_descPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial R] [NoZeroDivisors R] :
Monic <| descPochhammer R n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have h : leadingCoeff (X - 1 : R[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_sub_C 1
have : natDegree (X - (1 : R[X])) ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_sub_C (1 : R)
rw [descPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_comp this, hn, monic_X,
one_mul, one_mul, h, one_pow]
section
variable {R} {T : Type v} [Ring T]
@[simp]
theorem descPochhammer_map (f : R →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(descPochhammer R n).map f = descPochhammer T n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [ih, descPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
end
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem descPochhammer_eval_cast (n : ℕ) (k : ℤ) :
(((descPochhammer ℤ n).eval k : ℤ) : R) = ((descPochhammer R n).eval k : R) := by
rw [← descPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℤ R), eval_map, ← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ R)]
simp only [algebraMap_int_eq, eq_intCast, eval₂_at_intCast, Nat.cast_id, eq_natCast, Int.cast_id]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 289 | 293 | theorem descPochhammer_eval_zero {n : ℕ} :
(descPochhammer R n).eval 0 = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by |
cases n
· simp
· simp [X_mul, Nat.succ_ne_zero, descPochhammer_succ_left]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
#align_import topology.uniform_space.uniform_convergence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2705404e701abc6b3127da906f40bae062a169c9"
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
{g : ι → α}
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformlyOnFilter
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_iff_tendsto tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly_on TendstoUniformlyOn
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 106 | 111 | theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by |
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Basic
#align_import data.set.pairwise.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4c2ed622f43768eff32608d4a0f8a6cec1c047d"
open Function Set Order
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*} {κ : Sort*} {r p q : α → α → Prop}
section Pairwise
variable {f g : ι → α} {s t u : Set α} {a b : α}
namespace Set
theorem pairwise_iUnion {f : κ → Set α} (h : Directed (· ⊆ ·) f) :
(⋃ n, f n).Pairwise r ↔ ∀ n, (f n).Pairwise r := by
constructor
· intro H n
exact Pairwise.mono (subset_iUnion _ _) H
· intro H i hi j hj hij
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hi with ⟨m, hm⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hj with ⟨n, hn⟩
rcases h m n with ⟨p, mp, np⟩
exact H p (mp hm) (np hn) hij
#align set.pairwise_Union Set.pairwise_iUnion
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pairwise/Lattice.lean | 39 | 41 | theorem pairwise_sUnion {r : α → α → Prop} {s : Set (Set α)} (h : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) s) :
(⋃₀ s).Pairwise r ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, Set.Pairwise a r := by |
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion, pairwise_iUnion h.directed_val, SetCoe.forall]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.IdealOperations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Quotient
#align_import algebra.lie.normalizer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"938fead7abdc0cbbca8eba7a1052865a169dc102"
variable {R L M M' : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M'] [LieRingModule L M'] [LieModule R L M']
namespace LieSubmodule
variable (N : LieSubmodule R L M) {N₁ N₂ : LieSubmodule R L M}
def normalizer : LieSubmodule R L M where
carrier := {m | ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N}
add_mem' hm₁ hm₂ x := by rw [lie_add]; exact N.add_mem' (hm₁ x) (hm₂ x)
zero_mem' x := by simp
smul_mem' t m hm x := by rw [lie_smul]; exact N.smul_mem' t (hm x)
lie_mem {x m} hm y := by rw [leibniz_lie]; exact N.add_mem' (hm ⁅y, x⁆) (N.lie_mem (hm y))
#align lie_submodule.normalizer LieSubmodule.normalizer
@[simp]
theorem mem_normalizer (m : M) : m ∈ N.normalizer ↔ ∀ x : L, ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ N :=
Iff.rfl
#align lie_submodule.mem_normalizer LieSubmodule.mem_normalizer
@[simp]
theorem le_normalizer : N ≤ N.normalizer := by
intro m hm
rw [mem_normalizer]
exact fun x => N.lie_mem hm
#align lie_submodule.le_normalizer LieSubmodule.le_normalizer
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Normalizer.lean | 70 | 71 | theorem normalizer_inf : (N₁ ⊓ N₂).normalizer = N₁.normalizer ⊓ N₂.normalizer := by |
ext; simp [← forall_and]
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.CoprodI
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coprod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Complement
namespace Monoid
open CoprodI Subgroup Coprod Function List
variable {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} {H : Type*} {K : Type*} [Monoid K]
def PushoutI.con [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) :
Con (Coprod (CoprodI G) H) :=
conGen (fun x y : Coprod (CoprodI G) H =>
∃ i x', x = inl (of (φ i x')) ∧ y = inr x')
def PushoutI [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] (φ : ∀ i, H →* G i) : Type _ :=
(PushoutI.con φ).Quotient
namespace PushoutI
section Monoid
variable [∀ i, Monoid (G i)] [Monoid H] {φ : ∀ i, H →* G i}
protected instance mul : Mul (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
protected instance one : One (PushoutI φ) := by
delta PushoutI; infer_instance
instance monoid : Monoid (PushoutI φ) :=
{ Con.monoid _ with
toMul := PushoutI.mul
toOne := PushoutI.one }
def of (i : ι) : G i →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp <| inl.comp CoprodI.of
variable (φ) in
def base : H →* PushoutI φ :=
(Con.mk' _).comp inr
theorem of_comp_eq_base (i : ι) : (of i).comp (φ i) = (base φ) := by
ext x
apply (Con.eq _).2
refine ConGen.Rel.of _ _ ?_
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
variable (φ) in
theorem of_apply_eq_base (i : ι) (x : H) : of i (φ i x) = base φ x := by
rw [← MonoidHom.comp_apply, of_comp_eq_base]
def lift (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k) :
PushoutI φ →* K :=
Con.lift _ (Coprod.lift (CoprodI.lift f) k) <| by
apply Con.conGen_le fun x y => ?_
rintro ⟨i, x', rfl, rfl⟩
simp only [DFunLike.ext_iff, MonoidHom.coe_comp, comp_apply] at hf
simp [hf]
@[simp]
theorem lift_of (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
{i : ι} (g : G i) : (lift f k hf) (of i g : PushoutI φ) = f i g := by
delta PushoutI lift of
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe,
lift_apply_inl, CoprodI.lift_of]
@[simp]
theorem lift_base (f : ∀ i, G i →* K) (k : H →* K)
(hf : ∀ i, (f i).comp (φ i) = k)
(g : H) : (lift f k hf) (base φ g : PushoutI φ) = k g := by
delta PushoutI lift base
simp only [MonoidHom.coe_comp, Con.coe_mk', comp_apply, Con.lift_coe, lift_apply_inr]
-- `ext` attribute should be lower priority then `hom_ext_nonempty`
@[ext 1199]
theorem hom_ext {f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _))
(hbase : f.comp (base φ) = g.comp (base φ)) : f = g :=
(MonoidHom.cancel_right Con.mk'_surjective).mp <|
Coprod.hom_ext
(CoprodI.ext_hom _ _ h)
hbase
@[ext high]
theorem hom_ext_nonempty [hn : Nonempty ι]
{f g : PushoutI φ →* K}
(h : ∀ i, f.comp (of i : G i →* _) = g.comp (of i : G i →* _)) : f = g :=
hom_ext h <| by
cases hn with
| intro i =>
ext
rw [← of_comp_eq_base i, ← MonoidHom.comp_assoc, h, MonoidHom.comp_assoc]
@[simps]
def homEquiv :
(PushoutI φ →* K) ≃ { f : (Π i, G i →* K) × (H →* K) // ∀ i, (f.1 i).comp (φ i) = f.2 } :=
{ toFun := fun f => ⟨(fun i => f.comp (of i), f.comp (base φ)),
fun i => by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, of_comp_eq_base]⟩
invFun := fun f => lift f.1.1 f.1.2 f.2,
left_inv := fun _ => hom_ext (by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
(by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff])
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => by simp [DFunLike.ext_iff, Function.funext_iff] }
def ofCoprodI : CoprodI G →* PushoutI φ :=
CoprodI.lift of
@[simp]
theorem ofCoprodI_of (i : ι) (g : G i) :
(ofCoprodI (CoprodI.of g) : PushoutI φ) = of i g := by
simp [ofCoprodI]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PushoutI.lean | 167 | 184 | theorem induction_on {motive : PushoutI φ → Prop}
(x : PushoutI φ)
(of : ∀ (i : ι) (g : G i), motive (of i g))
(base : ∀ h, motive (base φ h))
(mul : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x * y)) : motive x := by |
delta PushoutI PushoutI.of PushoutI.base at *
induction x using Con.induction_on with
| H x =>
induction x using Coprod.induction_on with
| inl g =>
induction g using CoprodI.induction_on with
| h_of i g => exact of i g
| h_mul x y ihx ihy =>
rw [map_mul]
exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
| h_one => simpa using base 1
| inr h => exact base h
| mul x y ihx ihy => exact mul _ _ ihx ihy
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.charpoly.linear_map from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"62c0a4ef1441edb463095ea02a06e87f3dfe135c"
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
variable (b : ι → M) (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤)
open Polynomial Matrix
def PiToModule.fromMatrix [DecidableEq ι] : Matrix ι ι R →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
(LinearMap.llcomp R _ _ _ (Fintype.total R R b)).comp algEquivMatrix'.symm.toLinearMap
#align pi_to_module.from_matrix PiToModule.fromMatrix
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A w = Fintype.total R R b (A *ᵥ w) :=
rfl
#align pi_to_module.from_matrix_apply PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply
theorem PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (A : Matrix ι ι R) (j : ι) :
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A (Pi.single j 1) = ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i := by
rw [PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply, Fintype.total_apply, Matrix.mulVec_single]
simp_rw [mul_one]
#align pi_to_module.from_matrix_apply_single_one PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one
def PiToModule.fromEnd : Module.End R M →ₗ[R] (ι → R) →ₗ[R] M :=
LinearMap.lcomp _ _ (Fintype.total R R b)
#align pi_to_module.from_End PiToModule.fromEnd
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply (f : Module.End R M) (w : ι → R) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f w = f (Fintype.total R R b w) :=
rfl
#align pi_to_module.from_End_apply PiToModule.fromEnd_apply
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one [DecidableEq ι] (f : Module.End R M) (i : ι) :
PiToModule.fromEnd R b f (Pi.single i 1) = f (b i) := by
rw [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply]
congr
convert Fintype.total_apply_single (S := R) R b i (1 : R)
rw [one_smul]
#align pi_to_module.from_End_apply_single_one PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one
theorem PiToModule.fromEnd_injective (hb : Submodule.span R (Set.range b) = ⊤) :
Function.Injective (PiToModule.fromEnd R b) := by
intro x y e
ext m
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : m ∈ LinearMap.range (Fintype.total R R b) := by
rw [(Fintype.range_total R b).trans hb]
exact Submodule.mem_top
exact (LinearMap.congr_fun e m : _)
#align pi_to_module.from_End_injective PiToModule.fromEnd_injective
section
variable {R} [DecidableEq ι]
def Matrix.Represents (A : Matrix ι ι R) (f : Module.End R M) : Prop :=
PiToModule.fromMatrix R b A = PiToModule.fromEnd R b f
#align matrix.represents Matrix.Represents
variable {b}
theorem Matrix.Represents.congr_fun {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(x) : Fintype.total R R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.total R R b x) :=
LinearMap.congr_fun h x
#align matrix.represents.congr_fun Matrix.Represents.congr_fun
theorem Matrix.represents_iff {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔ ∀ x, Fintype.total R R b (A *ᵥ x) = f (Fintype.total R R b x) :=
⟨fun e x => e.congr_fun x, fun H => LinearMap.ext fun x => H x⟩
#align matrix.represents_iff Matrix.represents_iff
theorem Matrix.represents_iff' {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} :
A.Represents b f ↔ ∀ j, ∑ i : ι, A i j • b i = f (b j) := by
constructor
· intro h i
have := LinearMap.congr_fun h (Pi.single i 1)
rwa [PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one, PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one] at this
· intro h
-- Porting note: was `ext`
refine LinearMap.pi_ext' (fun i => LinearMap.ext_ring ?_)
simp_rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_single, PiToModule.fromEnd_apply_single_one,
PiToModule.fromMatrix_apply_single_one]
apply h
#align matrix.represents_iff' Matrix.represents_iff'
theorem Matrix.Represents.mul {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A * A').Represents b (f * f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, _root_.map_mul]
ext
dsimp [PiToModule.fromEnd]
rw [← h'.congr_fun, ← h.congr_fun]
rfl
#align matrix.represents.mul Matrix.Represents.mul
theorem Matrix.Represents.one : (1 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 1 := by
delta Matrix.Represents PiToModule.fromMatrix
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.toLinearMap_apply, _root_.map_one]
ext
rfl
#align matrix.represents.one Matrix.Represents.one
theorem Matrix.Represents.add {A A' : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : Matrix.Represents b A' f') : (A + A').Represents b (f + f') := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h h' ⊢; rw [map_add, map_add, h, h']
#align matrix.represents.add Matrix.Represents.add
theorem Matrix.Represents.zero : (0 : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b 0 := by
delta Matrix.Represents
rw [map_zero, map_zero]
#align matrix.represents.zero Matrix.Represents.zero
theorem Matrix.Represents.smul {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(r : R) : (r • A).Represents b (r • f) := by
delta Matrix.Represents at h ⊢
rw [_root_.map_smul, _root_.map_smul, h]
#align matrix.represents.smul Matrix.Represents.smul
theorem Matrix.Represents.algebraMap (r : R) :
(algebraMap _ (Matrix ι ι R) r).Represents b (algebraMap _ (Module.End R M) r) := by
simpa only [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] using Matrix.Represents.one.smul r
theorem Matrix.Represents.eq {A : Matrix ι ι R} {f f' : Module.End R M} (h : A.Represents b f)
(h' : A.Represents b f') : f = f' :=
PiToModule.fromEnd_injective R b hb (h.symm.trans h')
#align matrix.represents.eq Matrix.Represents.eq
variable (b R)
def Matrix.isRepresentation : Subalgebra R (Matrix ι ι R) where
carrier := { A | ∃ f : Module.End R M, A.Represents b f }
mul_mem' := fun ⟨f₁, e₁⟩ ⟨f₂, e₂⟩ => ⟨f₁ * f₂, e₁.mul e₂⟩
one_mem' := ⟨1, Matrix.Represents.one⟩
add_mem' := fun ⟨f₁, e₁⟩ ⟨f₂, e₂⟩ => ⟨f₁ + f₂, e₁.add e₂⟩
zero_mem' := ⟨0, Matrix.Represents.zero⟩
algebraMap_mem' r := ⟨algebraMap _ _ r, .algebraMap _⟩
#align matrix.is_representation Matrix.isRepresentation
noncomputable def Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd :
Matrix.isRepresentation R b →ₐ[R] Module.End R M where
toFun A := A.2.choose
map_one' := (1 : Matrix.isRepresentation R b).2.choose_spec.eq hb Matrix.Represents.one
map_mul' A₁ A₂ := (A₁ * A₂).2.choose_spec.eq hb (A₁.2.choose_spec.mul A₂.2.choose_spec)
map_zero' := (0 : Matrix.isRepresentation R b).2.choose_spec.eq hb Matrix.Represents.zero
map_add' A₁ A₂ := (A₁ + A₂).2.choose_spec.eq hb (A₁.2.choose_spec.add A₂.2.choose_spec)
commutes' r :=
(algebraMap _ (Matrix.isRepresentation R b) r).2.choose_spec.eq hb (.algebraMap r)
#align matrix.is_representation.to_End Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_represents (A : Matrix.isRepresentation R b) :
(A : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b (Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb A) :=
A.2.choose_spec
#align matrix.is_representation.to_End_represents Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_represents
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents (A : Matrix.isRepresentation R b)
{f : Module.End R M} (h : (A : Matrix ι ι R).Represents b f) :
Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb A = f :=
A.2.choose_spec.eq hb h
#align matrix.is_representation.eq_to_End_of_represents Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents
theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal (f : Module.End R M) (I : Ideal R)
(hI : LinearMap.range f ≤ I • ⊤) :
∃ M, Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb M = f ∧ ∀ i j, M.1 i j ∈ I := by
have : ∀ x, f x ∈ LinearMap.range (Ideal.finsuppTotal ι M I b) := by
rw [Ideal.range_finsuppTotal, hb]
exact fun x => hI (LinearMap.mem_range_self f x)
choose bM' hbM' using this
let A : Matrix ι ι R := fun i j => bM' (b j) i
have : A.Represents b f := by
rw [Matrix.represents_iff']
dsimp [A]
intro j
specialize hbM' (b j)
rwa [Ideal.finsuppTotal_apply_eq_of_fintype] at hbM'
exact
⟨⟨A, f, this⟩, Matrix.isRepresentation.eq_toEnd_of_represents R b hb ⟨A, f, this⟩ this,
fun i j => (bM' (b j) i).prop⟩
#align matrix.is_representation.to_End_exists_mem_ideal Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/LinearMap.lean | 211 | 215 | theorem Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_surjective :
Function.Surjective (Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd R b hb) := by |
intro f
obtain ⟨M, e, -⟩ := Matrix.isRepresentation.toEnd_exists_mem_ideal R b hb f ⊤ (by simp)
exact ⟨M, e⟩
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
#align_import topology.metric_space.infsep from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5316314b553dcf8c6716541851517c1a9715e22b"
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
#align set.einfsep Set.einfsep
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
#align set.le_einfsep_iff Set.le_einfsep_iff
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_zero Set.einfsep_zero
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
#align set.einfsep_pos Set.einfsep_pos
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
#align set.einfsep_top Set.einfsep_top
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_lt_top Set.einfsep_lt_top
theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
#align set.einfsep_ne_top Set.einfsep_ne_top
theorem einfsep_lt_iff {d} :
s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < d := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_lt_iff Set.einfsep_lt_iff
theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.einfsep < ∞) : s.Nontrivial := by
rcases einfsep_lt_top.1 hs with ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy, _⟩
exact ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩
#align set.nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top Set.nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top
theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top (hs : s.einfsep ≠ ∞) : s.Nontrivial :=
nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr hs)
#align set.nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top Set.nontrivial_of_einfsep_ne_top
theorem Subsingleton.einfsep (hs : s.Subsingleton) : s.einfsep = ∞ := by
rw [einfsep_top]
exact fun _ hx _ hy hxy => (hxy <| hs hx hy).elim
#align set.subsingleton.einfsep Set.Subsingleton.einfsep
theorem le_einfsep_image_iff {d} {f : β → α} {s : Set β} : d ≤ einfsep (f '' s)
↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x ≠ f y → d ≤ edist (f x) (f y) := by
simp_rw [le_einfsep_iff, forall_mem_image]
#align set.le_einfsep_image_iff Set.le_einfsep_image_iff
theorem le_edist_of_le_einfsep {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hd : d ≤ s.einfsep) : d ≤ edist x y :=
le_einfsep_iff.1 hd x hx y hy hxy
#align set.le_edist_of_le_einfsep Set.le_edist_of_le_einfsep
theorem einfsep_le_edist_of_mem {x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y) :
s.einfsep ≤ edist x y :=
le_edist_of_le_einfsep hx hy hxy le_rfl
#align set.einfsep_le_edist_of_mem Set.einfsep_le_edist_of_mem
theorem einfsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le {d x} (hx : x ∈ s) {y} (hy : y ∈ s) (hxy : x ≠ y)
(hxy' : edist x y ≤ d) : s.einfsep ≤ d :=
le_trans (einfsep_le_edist_of_mem hx hy hxy) hxy'
#align set.einfsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le Set.einfsep_le_of_mem_of_edist_le
theorem le_einfsep {d} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y) : d ≤ s.einfsep :=
le_einfsep_iff.2 h
#align set.le_einfsep Set.le_einfsep
@[simp]
theorem einfsep_empty : (∅ : Set α).einfsep = ∞ :=
subsingleton_empty.einfsep
#align set.einfsep_empty Set.einfsep_empty
@[simp]
theorem einfsep_singleton : ({x} : Set α).einfsep = ∞ :=
subsingleton_singleton.einfsep
#align set.einfsep_singleton Set.einfsep_singleton
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 132 | 133 | theorem einfsep_iUnion_mem_option {ι : Type*} (o : Option ι) (s : ι → Set α) :
(⋃ i ∈ o, s i).einfsep = ⨅ i ∈ o, (s i).einfsep := by | cases o <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
#align_import measure_theory.group.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped Classical ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SigmaFinite ν] [SigmaFinite μ] {s : Set G}
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
#align measurable_equiv.shear_mul_right MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight
#align measurable_equiv.shear_add_right MeasurableEquiv.shearAddRight
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
#align measurable_equiv.shear_div_right MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight
#align measurable_equiv.shear_sub_right MeasurableEquiv.shearSubRight
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.eventually_of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prod_mk_right
apply measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.measurable_measure_mul_right MeasureTheory.measurable_measure_mul_right
#align measure_theory.measurable_measure_add_right MeasureTheory.measurable_measure_add_right
variable [MeasurableInv G]
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_inv_mul MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_neg_add MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_inv_mul_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_neg_add_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_mul_prod_inv MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_add_prod_neg MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_inv MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_inv
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_neg MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
#align measure_theory.measure_inv_null MeasureTheory.measure_inv_null
#align measure_theory.measure_neg_null MeasureTheory.measure_neg_null
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.inv_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.inv_absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.neg_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.neg_absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_inv MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_inv
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_neg MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_add_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_right_null MeasureTheory.measure_mul_right_null
#align measure_theory.measure_add_right_null MeasureTheory.measure_add_right_null
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_right_ne_zero MeasureTheory.measure_mul_right_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure_add_right_ne_zero MeasureTheory.measure_add_right_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_mul_right MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_add_right MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
erw [← map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_div_left MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_sub_left MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_sub_left
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← set_lintegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator _ sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
· exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
∀ x : G, Measurable fun y => ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y :=
fun x => measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm)
have : ∀ x y, s.indicator (fun _ : G => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun b : G => 1) y := by
intro x y; symm; convert indicator_comp_right (M := ℝ≥0∞) fun y => y * x using 2; ext1; rfl
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (ms _), lintegral_indicator _ (measurable_mul_const _ sm),
set_lintegral_one]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.measure_mul_lintegral_eq
#align measure_theory.measure_add_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.measure_add_lintegral_eq
@[to_additive
" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. "]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s sm hνs => ?_
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm 1 measurable_one
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνs,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞), measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false_iff] at h1
exact h1
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_of_is_mul_left_invariant MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_of_is_add_left_invariant MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_of_isAddLeftInvariant
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine ae_of_forall_measure_lt_top_ae_restrict' ν.inv _ ?_
intro A hA _ h3A
simp only [ν.inv_apply] at h3A
apply ae_lt_top (measurable_measure_mul_right ν sm)
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm (A⁻¹.indicator 1) (measurable_one.indicator hA.inv)
rw [lintegral_indicator _ hA.inv] at h1
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, set_lintegral_one, ← image_inv, indicator_image inv_injective, image_inv, ←
indicator_mul_right _ fun x => ν ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s), Function.comp, Pi.one_apply,
mul_one] at h1
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ hA, ← h1]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs h3A.ne
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top
@[to_additive]
theorem ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero [IsMulLeftInvariant ν]
(sm : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ν ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) < ∞ := by
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top ν ν sm h3s).filter_mono ?_
refine (absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant μ ν ?_).ae_le
refine mt ?_ h2s
intro hν
rw [hν, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero
@[to_additive
"A technical lemma relating two different measures. This is basically [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. Note that
if `f` is the characteristic function of a measurable set `t` this states that `μ t = c * μ s` for a
constant `c` that does not depend on `μ`.
Note: There is a gap in the last step of the proof in [Halmos]. In the last line, the equality
`g(-x) + ν(s - x) = f(x)` holds if we can prove that `0 < ν(s - x) < ∞`. The first inequality
follows from §59, Th. D, but the second inequality is not justified. We prove this inequality for
almost all `x` in `MeasureTheory.ae_measure_preimage_add_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero`."]
theorem measure_lintegral_div_measure [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0)
(h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun x => x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s) ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
set g := fun y => f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun x => x * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)
have hg : Measurable g :=
(hf.comp measurable_inv).div ((measurable_measure_mul_right ν sm).comp measurable_inv)
simp_rw [measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm g hg, g, inv_inv]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
refine (ae_measure_preimage_mul_right_lt_top_of_ne_zero μ ν sm h2s h3s).mono fun x hx => ?_
simp_rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (measure_mul_right_ne_zero ν h2s _) hx.ne]
#align measure_theory.measure_lintegral_div_measure MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure
#align measure_theory.measure_lintegral_sub_measure MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_sub_measure
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_measure_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] {s t : Set G} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0) (h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) : μ s * ν t = ν s * μ t := by
have h1 :=
measure_lintegral_div_measure ν ν hs h2s h3s (t.indicator fun _ => 1)
(measurable_const.indicator ht)
have h2 :=
measure_lintegral_div_measure μ ν hs h2s h3s (t.indicator fun _ => 1)
(measurable_const.indicator ht)
rw [lintegral_indicator _ ht, set_lintegral_one] at h1 h2
rw [← h1, mul_left_comm, h2]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_measure_eq MeasureTheory.measure_mul_measure_eq
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_eq MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_eq
@[to_additive
" Left invariant Borel measures on an additive measurable group are unique (up to a scalar). "]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 355 | 359 | theorem measure_eq_div_smul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h2s : ν s ≠ 0)
(h3s : ν s ≠ ∞) : μ = (μ s / ν s) • ν := by |
ext1 t ht
rw [smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm,
measure_mul_measure_eq μ ν hs ht h2s h3s, mul_div_assoc, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' h2s h3s]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun.DomAct
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped ENNReal
namespace DomMulAct
variable {M N α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace N]
[MeasurableSpace α] [NormedAddCommGroup E] {μ : MeasureTheory.Measure α} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section SMul
variable [SMul M α] [SMulInvariantMeasure M α μ] [MeasurableSMul M α]
@[to_additive]
instance : SMul Mᵈᵐᵃ (Lp E p μ) where
smul c f := Lp.compMeasurePreserving (mk.symm c • ·) (measurePreserving_smul _ _) f
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_Lp_val (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (f : Lp E p μ) : (c • f).1 = c • f.1 := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_Lp_ae_eq (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • f =ᵐ[μ] (f <| mk.symm c • ·) :=
Lp.coeFn_compMeasurePreserving _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_smul_toLp (c : M) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
mk c • hf.toLp f =
(hf.comp_measurePreserving <| measurePreserving_smul c μ).toLp (f <| c • ·) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_Lp_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) (a : E) :
c • Lp.const p μ a = Lp.const p μ a :=
rfl
instance [SMul N α] [SMulCommClass M N α] [SMulInvariantMeasure N α μ] [MeasurableSMul N α] :
SMulCommClass Mᵈᵐᵃ Nᵈᵐᵃ (Lp E p μ) :=
Subtype.val_injective.smulCommClass (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] : SMulCommClass Mᵈᵐᵃ 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
Subtype.val_injective.smulCommClass (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) fun _ _ ↦ rfl
instance [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 Mᵈᵐᵃ (Lp E p μ) :=
.symm _ _ _
-- We don't have a typeclass for additive versions of the next few lemmas
-- Should we add `AddDistribAddAction` with `to_additive` both from `MulDistribMulAction`
-- and `DistribMulAction`?
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSpace/DomAct/Basic.lean | 70 | 71 | theorem smul_Lp_add (c : Mᵈᵐᵃ) : ∀ f g : Lp E p μ, c • (f + g) = c • f + c • g := by |
rintro ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 100 | 104 | theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by |
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
|
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import data.real.irrational from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e7aaccf9b0182576cabdde36cf1b5ad3585b70d"
open Rat Real multiplicity
def Irrational (x : ℝ) :=
x ∉ Set.range ((↑) : ℚ → ℝ)
#align irrational Irrational
theorem irrational_iff_ne_rational (x : ℝ) : Irrational x ↔ ∀ a b : ℤ, x ≠ a / b := by
simp only [Irrational, Rat.forall, cast_mk, not_exists, Set.mem_range, cast_intCast, cast_div,
eq_comm]
#align irrational_iff_ne_rational irrational_iff_ne_rational
theorem Transcendental.irrational {r : ℝ} (tr : Transcendental ℚ r) : Irrational r := by
rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact tr (isAlgebraic_algebraMap a)
#align transcendental.irrational Transcendental.irrational
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Irrational.lean | 50 | 65 | theorem irrational_nrt_of_notint_nrt {x : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (m : ℤ) (hxr : x ^ n = m)
(hv : ¬∃ y : ℤ, x = y) (hnpos : 0 < n) : Irrational x := by |
rintro ⟨⟨N, D, P, C⟩, rfl⟩
rw [← cast_pow] at hxr
have c1 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [Int.cast_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero]
exact P
have c2 : ((D : ℤ) : ℝ) ^ n ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ c1
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, cast_pow, cast_mk, div_pow, div_eq_iff_mul_eq c2, ← Int.cast_pow,
← Int.cast_pow, ← Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_inj] at hxr
have hdivn : (D : ℤ) ^ n ∣ N ^ n := Dvd.intro_left m hxr
rw [← Int.dvd_natAbs, ← Int.natCast_pow, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.natAbs_pow,
Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff hnpos.ne'] at hdivn
obtain rfl : D = 1 := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_right hdivn, C.gcd_eq_one]
refine hv ⟨N, ?_⟩
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, Int.ofNat_one, divInt_one, cast_intCast]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import data.nat.part_enat from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
open Part hiding some
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
#align part_enat PartENat
namespace PartENat
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
#align part_enat.some PartENat.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_some PartENat.dom_some
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm x y := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add x := Part.ext' (true_and_iff _) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero x := Part.ext' (and_true_iff _) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc x y z := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (true_and_iff _).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
#align part_enat.some_eq_coe PartENat.some_eq_natCast
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
#align part_enat.coe_inj PartENat.natCast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
#align part_enat.dom_coe PartENat.dom_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Sup PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
#align part_enat.le_def PartENat.le_def
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
#align part_enat.cases_on' PartENat.casesOn'
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
#align part_enat.cases_on PartENat.casesOn
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (false_and_iff _) fun h => h.left.elim
#align part_enat.top_add PartENat.top_add
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
#align part_enat.add_top PartENat.add_top
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
#align part_enat.coe_get PartENat.natCast_get
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_coe' PartENat.get_natCast'
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
#align part_enat.get_coe PartENat.get_natCast
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_add_get PartENat.coe_add_get
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_add PartENat.get_add
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_zero PartENat.get_zero
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.get_one PartENat.get_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)).Dom) :
Part.get (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) h = (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x)) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_some PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
#align part_enat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_of_dom PartENat.dom_of_le_of_dom
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_some PartENat.dom_of_le_some
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
#align part_enat.dom_of_le_coe PartENat.dom_of_le_natCast
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (by rw [le_def])
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
#align part_enat.decidable_le PartENat.decidableLe
-- Porting note: Removed. Use `Nat.castAddMonoidHom` instead.
#noalign part_enat.coe_hom
#noalign part_enat.coe_coe_hom
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
cases' h with hx' h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
#align part_enat.lt_def PartENat.lt_def
noncomputable instance orderedAddCommMonoid : OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder, PartENat.addCommMonoid with
add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
#align part_enat.semilattice_sup PartENat.semilatticeSup
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
#align part_enat.order_bot PartENat.orderBot
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
#align part_enat.order_top PartENat.orderTop
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
#align part_enat.coe_le_coe PartENat.coe_le_coe
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
#align part_enat.coe_lt_coe PartENat.coe_lt_coe
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
#align part_enat.get_le_get PartENat.get_le_get
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
#align part_enat.le_coe_iff PartENat.le_coe_iff
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_iff PartENat.lt_coe_iff
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_le_iff PartENat.coe_le_iff
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
#align part_enat.coe_lt_iff PartENat.coe_lt_iff
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
#align part_enat.eq_zero_iff PartENat.eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
#align part_enat.ne_zero_iff PartENat.ne_zero_iff
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
#align part_enat.dom_of_lt PartENat.dom_of_lt
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
#align part_enat.top_eq_none PartENat.top_eq_none
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
#align part_enat.coe_lt_top PartENat.natCast_lt_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.coe_ne_top PartENat.natCast_ne_top
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (no_index (OfNat.ofNat x : PartENat)) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
#align part_enat.not_is_max_coe PartENat.not_isMax_natCast
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff PartENat.ne_top_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
#align part_enat.ne_top_iff_dom PartENat.ne_top_iff_dom
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
#align part_enat.not_dom_iff_eq_top PartENat.not_dom_iff_eq_top
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
#align part_enat.ne_top_of_lt PartENat.ne_top_of_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_lt
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
#align part_enat.eq_top_iff_forall_le PartENat.eq_top_iff_forall_le
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [iff_true_iff, le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
#align part_enat.pos_iff_one_le PartENat.pos_iff_one_le
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
-- Porting note: was `max_def := @sup_eq_maxDefault _ _ (id _) _ }`
max_def := fun a b => by
change (fun a b => a ⊔ b) a b = _
rw [@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (id _) _]
rfl }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup, PartENat.orderBot,
PartENat.orderedAddCommMonoid with
le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun a =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
#align part_enat.eq_coe_sub_of_add_eq_coe PartENat.eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
-- Porting note: was apply_mod_cast natCast_lt_top
norm_cast; apply natCast_lt_top
norm_cast at h
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h`
norm_cast; apply add_lt_add_right h
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_right PartENat.add_lt_add_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_right PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
#align part_enat.add_lt_add_iff_left PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
#align part_enat.lt_add_iff_pos_right PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
#align part_enat.lt_add_one PartENat.lt_add_one
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.le_of_lt_add_one PartENat.le_of_lt_add_one
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.succ_le_of_lt; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_of_lt PartENat.add_one_le_of_lt
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_of_succ_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.add_one_le_iff_lt PartENat.add_one_le_iff_lt
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
#align part_enat.coe_succ_le_succ_iff PartENat.coe_succ_le_iff
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction' y using PartENat.casesOn with n
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
-- Porting note: was `apply_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le; apply_mod_cast h`
norm_cast; apply Nat.lt_succ_of_le; norm_cast at h
#align part_enat.lt_add_one_iff_lt PartENat.lt_add_one_iff_lt
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
#align part_enat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le PartENat.lt_coe_succ_iff_le
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
#align part_enat.add_eq_top_iff PartENat.add_eq_top_iff
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
#align part_enat.add_right_cancel_iff PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
#align part_enat.add_left_cancel_iff PartENat.add_left_cancel_iff
section WithTop
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
#align part_enat.to_with_top PartENat.toWithTop
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top PartENat.toWithTop_top
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
#align part_enat.to_with_top_top' PartENat.toWithTop_top'
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align part_enat.to_with_top_zero PartENat.toWithTop_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 605 | 606 | theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by |
convert toWithTop_zero
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
#align_import number_theory.ramification_inertia from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"039a089d2a4b93c761b234f3e5f5aeb752bac60f"
namespace Ideal
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {S : Type v} [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S)
variable (p : Ideal R) (P : Ideal S)
open FiniteDimensional
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
section DecEq
open scoped Classical
noncomputable def ramificationIdx : ℕ := sSup {n | map f p ≤ P ^ n}
#align ideal.ramification_idx Ideal.ramificationIdx
variable {f p P}
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_find (h : ∃ n, ∀ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ n) :
ramificationIdx f p P = Nat.find h :=
Nat.sSup_def h
#align ideal.ramification_idx_eq_find Ideal.ramificationIdx_eq_find
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_zero (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k ∧ n < k) :
ramificationIdx f p P = 0 :=
dif_neg (by push_neg; exact h)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_eq_zero Ideal.ramificationIdx_eq_zero
theorem ramificationIdx_spec {n : ℕ} (hle : map f p ≤ P ^ n) (hgt : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ (n + 1)) :
ramificationIdx f p P = n := by
let Q : ℕ → Prop := fun m => ∀ k : ℕ, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ m
have : Q n := by
intro k hk
refine le_of_not_lt fun hnk => ?_
exact hgt (hk.trans (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hnk))
rw [ramificationIdx_eq_find ⟨n, this⟩]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_min' _ this) (le_of_not_gt fun h : Nat.find _ < n => ?_)
obtain this' := Nat.find_spec ⟨n, this⟩
exact h.not_le (this' _ hle)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_spec Ideal.ramificationIdx_spec
theorem ramificationIdx_lt {n : ℕ} (hgt : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ n) : ramificationIdx f p P < n := by
cases' n with n n
· simp at hgt
· rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff]
have : ∀ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ n := by
refine fun k hk => le_of_not_lt fun hnk => ?_
exact hgt (hk.trans (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hnk))
rw [ramificationIdx_eq_find ⟨n, this⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨n, this⟩ this
#align ideal.ramification_idx_lt Ideal.ramificationIdx_lt
@[simp]
theorem ramificationIdx_bot : ramificationIdx f ⊥ P = 0 :=
dif_neg <| not_exists.mpr fun n hn => n.lt_succ_self.not_le (hn _ (by simp))
#align ideal.ramification_idx_bot Ideal.ramificationIdx_bot
@[simp]
theorem ramificationIdx_of_not_le (h : ¬map f p ≤ P) : ramificationIdx f p P = 0 :=
ramificationIdx_spec (by simp) (by simpa using h)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_of_not_le Ideal.ramificationIdx_of_not_le
theorem ramificationIdx_ne_zero {e : ℕ} (he : e ≠ 0) (hle : map f p ≤ P ^ e)
(hnle : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ (e + 1)) : ramificationIdx f p P ≠ 0 := by
rwa [ramificationIdx_spec hle hnle]
#align ideal.ramification_idx_ne_zero Ideal.ramificationIdx_ne_zero
theorem le_pow_of_le_ramificationIdx {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ ramificationIdx f p P) :
map f p ≤ P ^ n := by
contrapose! hn
exact ramificationIdx_lt hn
#align ideal.le_pow_of_le_ramification_idx Ideal.le_pow_of_le_ramificationIdx
theorem le_pow_ramificationIdx : map f p ≤ P ^ ramificationIdx f p P :=
le_pow_of_le_ramificationIdx (le_refl _)
#align ideal.le_pow_ramification_idx Ideal.le_pow_ramificationIdx
theorem le_comap_pow_ramificationIdx : p ≤ comap f (P ^ ramificationIdx f p P) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.mp le_pow_ramificationIdx
#align ideal.le_comap_pow_ramification_idx Ideal.le_comap_pow_ramificationIdx
theorem le_comap_of_ramificationIdx_ne_zero (h : ramificationIdx f p P ≠ 0) : p ≤ comap f P :=
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.mp <| le_pow_ramificationIdx.trans <| Ideal.pow_le_self <| h
#align ideal.le_comap_of_ramification_idx_ne_zero Ideal.le_comap_of_ramificationIdx_ne_zero
variable (f p P)
attribute [local instance] Ideal.Quotient.field
noncomputable def inertiaDeg [p.IsMaximal] : ℕ :=
if hPp : comap f P = p then
@finrank (R ⧸ p) (S ⧸ P) _ _ <|
@Algebra.toModule _ _ _ _ <|
RingHom.toAlgebra <|
Ideal.Quotient.lift p ((Ideal.Quotient.mk P).comp f) fun _ ha =>
Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr <| mem_comap.mp <| hPp.symm ▸ ha
else 0
#align ideal.inertia_deg Ideal.inertiaDeg
-- Useful for the `nontriviality` tactic using `comap_eq_of_scalar_tower_quotient`.
@[simp]
theorem inertiaDeg_of_subsingleton [hp : p.IsMaximal] [hQ : Subsingleton (S ⧸ P)] :
inertiaDeg f p P = 0 := by
have := Ideal.Quotient.subsingleton_iff.mp hQ
subst this
exact dif_neg fun h => hp.ne_top <| h.symm.trans comap_top
#align ideal.inertia_deg_of_subsingleton Ideal.inertiaDeg_of_subsingleton
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/RamificationInertia.lean | 206 | 216 | theorem inertiaDeg_algebraMap [Algebra R S] [Algebra (R ⧸ p) (S ⧸ P)]
[IsScalarTower R (R ⧸ p) (S ⧸ P)] [hp : p.IsMaximal] :
inertiaDeg (algebraMap R S) p P = finrank (R ⧸ p) (S ⧸ P) := by |
nontriviality S ⧸ P using inertiaDeg_of_subsingleton, finrank_zero_of_subsingleton
have := comap_eq_of_scalar_tower_quotient (algebraMap (R ⧸ p) (S ⧸ P)).injective
rw [inertiaDeg, dif_pos this]
congr
refine Algebra.algebra_ext _ _ fun x' => Quotient.inductionOn' x' fun x => ?_
change Ideal.Quotient.lift p _ _ (Ideal.Quotient.mk p x) = algebraMap _ _ (Ideal.Quotient.mk p x)
rw [Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, ← Ideal.Quotient.algebraMap_eq P, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq,
← Ideal.Quotient.algebraMap_eq, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
#align_import data.num.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
set_option linter.deprecated false
-- Porting note: Required for the notation `-[n+1]`.
open Int Function
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 712 | 712 | theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by | cases b <;> cases n <;> rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Block
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.AlgebraTower
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Tower
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.to_lin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0e2aab2b0d521f060f62a14d2cf2e2c54e8491d6"
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
section ToMatrixRight
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {l m n : Type*}
def Matrix.vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) : (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R where
toFun x := x ᵥ* M
map_add' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ add_dotProduct _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := funext fun _ ↦ smul_dotProduct _ _ _
#align matrix.vec_mul_linear Matrix.vecMulLinear
@[simp] theorem Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) (x : m → R) :
M.vecMulLinear x = x ᵥ* M := rfl
theorem Matrix.coe_vecMulLinear [Fintype m] (M : Matrix m n R) :
(M.vecMulLinear : _ → _) = M.vecMul := rfl
variable [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m]
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_stdBasis (M : Matrix m n R) (i j) :
(LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) i 1 ᵥ* M) j = M i j := by
have : (∑ i', (if i = i' then 1 else 0) * M i' j) = M i j := by
simp_rw [boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp only [vecMul, dotProduct]
convert this
split_ifs with h <;> simp only [stdBasis_apply]
· rw [h, Function.update_same]
· rw [Function.update_noteq (Ne.symm h), Pi.zero_apply]
#align matrix.vec_mul_std_basis Matrix.vecMul_stdBasis
theorem range_vecMulLinear (M : Matrix m n R) :
LinearMap.range M.vecMulLinear = span R (range M) := by
letI := Classical.decEq m
simp_rw [range_eq_map, ← iSup_range_stdBasis, Submodule.map_iSup, range_eq_map, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span, image_image, image_singleton,
Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply, iSup_span, range_eq_iUnion, iUnion_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.stdBasis, coe_single]
unfold vecMul
simp_rw [single_dotProduct, one_mul]
theorem Matrix.vecMul_injective_iff {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Matrix m n R} :
Function.Injective M.vecMul ↔ LinearIndependent R (fun i ↦ M i) := by
rw [← coe_vecMulLinear]
simp only [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff,
LinearMap.mem_ker, vecMulLinear_apply]
refine ⟨fun h c h0 ↦ congr_fun <| h c ?_, fun h c h0 ↦ funext <| h c ?_⟩
· rw [← h0]
ext i
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
· rw [← h0]
ext j
simp [vecMul, dotProduct]
def LinearMap.toMatrixRight' : ((m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] Matrix m n R where
toFun f i j := f (stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) i 1) j
invFun := Matrix.vecMulLinear
right_inv M := by
ext i j
simp only [Matrix.vecMul_stdBasis, Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply]
left_inv f := by
apply (Pi.basisFun R m).ext
intro j; ext i
simp only [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.vecMul_stdBasis, Matrix.vecMulLinear_apply]
map_add' f g := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.add_apply, LinearMap.add_apply, Matrix.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
ext i j
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply, Matrix.smul_apply]
#align linear_map.to_matrix_right' LinearMap.toMatrixRight'
abbrev Matrix.toLinearMapRight' : Matrix m n R ≃ₗ[Rᵐᵒᵖ] (m → R) →ₗ[R] n → R :=
LinearEquiv.symm LinearMap.toMatrixRight'
#align matrix.to_linear_map_right' Matrix.toLinearMapRight'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_apply (M : Matrix m n R) (v : m → R) :
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight') M v = v ᵥ* M := rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_map_right'_apply Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_apply
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) =
(Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N).comp (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _x ↦ (vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map_right'_mul Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply [Fintype l] [DecidableEq l] (M : Matrix l m R)
(N : Matrix m n R) (x) :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (M * N) x =
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' N (Matrix.toLinearMapRight' M x) :=
(vecMul_vecMul _ M N).symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map_right'_mul_apply Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_mul_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ToLin.lean | 173 | 176 | theorem Matrix.toLinearMapRight'_one :
Matrix.toLinearMapRight' (1 : Matrix m m R) = LinearMap.id := by |
ext
simp [LinearMap.one_apply, stdBasis_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
#align_import algebra.order.field.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84771a9f5f0bd5e5d6218811556508ddf476dcbd"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
@[simps! (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def OrderIso.mulLeft₀ (a : α) (ha : 0 < a) : α ≃o α :=
{ Equiv.mulLeft₀ a ha.ne' with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => mul_le_mul_left ha }
#align order_iso.mul_left₀ OrderIso.mulLeft₀
#align order_iso.mul_left₀_symm_apply OrderIso.mulLeft₀_symm_apply
#align order_iso.mul_left₀_apply OrderIso.mulLeft₀_apply
@[simps! (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def OrderIso.mulRight₀ (a : α) (ha : 0 < a) : α ≃o α :=
{ Equiv.mulRight₀ a ha.ne' with map_rel_iff' := @fun _ _ => mul_le_mul_right ha }
#align order_iso.mul_right₀ OrderIso.mulRight₀
#align order_iso.mul_right₀_symm_apply OrderIso.mulRight₀_symm_apply
#align order_iso.mul_right₀_apply OrderIso.mulRight₀_apply
theorem le_div_iff (hc : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => div_mul_cancel₀ b (ne_of_lt hc).symm ▸ mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h hc.le, fun h =>
calc
a = a * c * (1 / c) := mul_mul_div a (ne_of_lt hc).symm
_ ≤ b * (1 / c) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_pos.2 hc).le
_ = b / c := (div_eq_mul_one_div b c).symm
⟩
#align le_div_iff le_div_iff
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 58 | 58 | theorem le_div_iff' (hc : 0 < c) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by | rw [mul_comm, le_div_iff hc]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.preadditive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"986c4d5761f938b2e1c43c01f001b6d9d88c2055"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive CategoryTheory.MonoidalPreadditive
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensorLeft_additive
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensorRight_additive
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringLeft_additive
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringRight_additive
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : MonoidalFunctor D C) [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive_of_faithful CategoryTheory.monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 113 | 115 | theorem tensor_sum {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(f ⊗ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ⊗ g j := by |
simp only [tensorHom_def, whiskerLeft_sum, Preadditive.comp_sum]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.HasseDeriv
#align_import data.polynomial.taylor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X])
def taylor (r : R) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun f := f.comp (X + C r)
map_add' f g := add_comp
map_smul' c f := by simp only [smul_eq_C_mul, C_mul_comp, RingHom.id_apply]
#align polynomial.taylor Polynomial.taylor
theorem taylor_apply : taylor r f = f.comp (X + C r) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.taylor_apply Polynomial.taylor_apply
@[simp]
theorem taylor_X : taylor r X = X + C r := by simp only [taylor_apply, X_comp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.taylor_X Polynomial.taylor_X
@[simp]
theorem taylor_C (x : R) : taylor r (C x) = C x := by simp only [taylor_apply, C_comp]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.taylor_C Polynomial.taylor_C
@[simp]
theorem taylor_zero' : taylor (0 : R) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp only [taylor_apply, add_zero, comp_X, _root_.map_zero, LinearMap.id_comp,
Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp]
#align polynomial.taylor_zero' Polynomial.taylor_zero'
theorem taylor_zero (f : R[X]) : taylor 0 f = f := by rw [taylor_zero', LinearMap.id_apply]
#align polynomial.taylor_zero Polynomial.taylor_zero
@[simp]
theorem taylor_one : taylor r (1 : R[X]) = C 1 := by rw [← C_1, taylor_C]
#align polynomial.taylor_one Polynomial.taylor_one
@[simp]
theorem taylor_monomial (i : ℕ) (k : R) : taylor r (monomial i k) = C k * (X + C r) ^ i := by
simp [taylor_apply]
#align polynomial.taylor_monomial Polynomial.taylor_monomial
theorem taylor_coeff (n : ℕ) : (taylor r f).coeff n = (hasseDeriv n f).eval r :=
show (lcoeff R n).comp (taylor r) f = (leval r).comp (hasseDeriv n) f by
congr 1; clear! f; ext i
simp only [leval_apply, mul_one, one_mul, eval_monomial, LinearMap.comp_apply, coeff_C_mul,
hasseDeriv_monomial, taylor_apply, monomial_comp, C_1, (commute_X (C r)).add_pow i,
map_sum]
simp only [lcoeff_apply, ← C_eq_natCast, mul_assoc, ← C_pow, ← C_mul, coeff_mul_C,
(Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, coeff_X_pow, boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_range]
split_ifs with h; · rfl
push_neg at h; rw [Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt h, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
#align polynomial.taylor_coeff Polynomial.taylor_coeff
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_zero : (taylor r f).coeff 0 = f.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_zero, LinearMap.id_apply]
#align polynomial.taylor_coeff_zero Polynomial.taylor_coeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem taylor_coeff_one : (taylor r f).coeff 1 = f.derivative.eval r := by
rw [taylor_coeff, hasseDeriv_one]
#align polynomial.taylor_coeff_one Polynomial.taylor_coeff_one
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_taylor (p : R[X]) (r : R) : natDegree (taylor r p) = natDegree p := by
refine map_natDegree_eq_natDegree _ ?_
nontriviality R
intro n c c0
simp [taylor_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_eq_of_mul_ne_zero, natDegree_pow_X_add_C, c0]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_taylor Polynomial.natDegree_taylor
@[simp]
theorem taylor_mul {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (p q : R[X]) :
taylor r (p * q) = taylor r p * taylor r q := by simp only [taylor_apply, mul_comp]
#align polynomial.taylor_mul Polynomial.taylor_mul
@[simps!]
def taylorAlgHom {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
AlgHom.ofLinearMap (taylor r) (taylor_one r) (taylor_mul r)
#align polynomial.taylor_alg_hom Polynomial.taylorAlgHom
theorem taylor_taylor {R} [CommSemiring R] (f : R[X]) (r s : R) :
taylor r (taylor s f) = taylor (r + s) f := by
simp only [taylor_apply, comp_assoc, map_add, add_comp, X_comp, C_comp, C_add, add_assoc]
#align polynomial.taylor_taylor Polynomial.taylor_taylor
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Taylor.lean | 121 | 123 | theorem taylor_eval {R} [CommSemiring R] (r : R) (f : R[X]) (s : R) :
(taylor r f).eval s = f.eval (s + r) := by |
simp only [taylor_apply, eval_comp, eval_C, eval_X, eval_add]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.chebyshev from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d774451114d6045faeb6751c396bea1eb9058946"
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `T` `U` `X`
open Polynomial
variable (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def T : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * T (n + 1) - T n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * T (-n) - T (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T Polynomial.Chebyshev.T
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induct (motive : ℤ → Prop)
(zero : motive 0)
(one : motive 1)
(add_two : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (↑n + 1) → motive ↑n → motive (↑n + 2))
(neg_add_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (-↑n) → motive (-↑n + 1) → motive (-↑n - 1)) :
∀ (a : ℤ), motive a :=
T.induct Unit motive zero one add_two fun n hn hnm => by
simpa only [Int.negSucc_eq, neg_add] using neg_add_one n hn hnm
@[simp]
theorem T_add_two : ∀ n, T R (n + 2) = 2 * X * T R (n + 1) - T R n
| (k : ℕ) => T.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) T.eq_4 R k
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_add_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_add_two
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Chebyshev.lean | 90 | 91 | theorem T_add_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n - 1) := by |
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
#align_import analysis.convex.star from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜) [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (x : E) (s : Set E)
def StarConvex : Prop :=
∀ ⦃y : E⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ s
#align star_convex StarConvex
variable {𝕜 x s} {t : Set E}
theorem starConvex_iff_segment_subset : StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s := by
constructor
· rintro h y hy z ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
exact h hy ha hb hab
· rintro h y hy a b ha hb hab
exact h hy ⟨a, b, ha, hb, hab, rfl⟩
#align star_convex_iff_segment_subset starConvex_iff_segment_subset
theorem StarConvex.segment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) : [x -[𝕜] y] ⊆ s :=
starConvex_iff_segment_subset.1 h hy
#align star_convex.segment_subset StarConvex.segment_subset
theorem StarConvex.openSegment_subset (h : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) {y : E} (hy : y ∈ s) :
openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ s :=
(openSegment_subset_segment 𝕜 x y).trans (h.segment_subset hy)
#align star_convex.open_segment_subset StarConvex.openSegment_subset
theorem starConvex_iff_pointwise_add_subset :
StarConvex 𝕜 x s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → a • {x} + b • s ⊆ s := by
refine
⟨?_, fun h y hy a b ha hb hab =>
h ha hb hab (add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set <| mem_singleton _) ⟨_, hy, rfl⟩)⟩
rintro hA a b ha hb hab w ⟨au, ⟨u, rfl : u = x, rfl⟩, bv, ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact hA hv ha hb hab
#align star_convex_iff_pointwise_add_subset starConvex_iff_pointwise_add_subset
theorem starConvex_empty (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x ∅ := fun _ hy => hy.elim
#align star_convex_empty starConvex_empty
theorem starConvex_univ (x : E) : StarConvex 𝕜 x univ := fun _ _ _ _ _ _ _ => trivial
#align star_convex_univ starConvex_univ
theorem StarConvex.inter (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) : StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab => ⟨hs hy.left ha hb hab, ht hy.right ha hb hab⟩
#align star_convex.inter StarConvex.inter
theorem starConvex_sInter {S : Set (Set E)} (h : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂₀ S) := fun _ hy _ _ ha hb hab s hs => h s hs (hy s hs) ha hb hab
#align star_convex_sInter starConvex_sInter
theorem starConvex_iInter {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (h : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋂ i, s i) :=
sInter_range s ▸ starConvex_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align star_convex_Inter starConvex_iInter
theorem StarConvex.union (hs : StarConvex 𝕜 x s) (ht : StarConvex 𝕜 x t) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (s ∪ t) := by
rintro y (hy | hy) a b ha hb hab
· exact Or.inl (hs hy ha hb hab)
· exact Or.inr (ht hy ha hb hab)
#align star_convex.union StarConvex.union
theorem starConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hs : ∀ i, StarConvex 𝕜 x (s i)) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro y hy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hy ⊢
obtain ⟨i, hy⟩ := hy
exact ⟨i, hs i hy ha hb hab⟩
#align star_convex_Union starConvex_iUnion
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Star.lean | 136 | 139 | theorem starConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StarConvex 𝕜 x s) :
StarConvex 𝕜 x (⋃₀ S) := by |
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact starConvex_iUnion fun s => hS _ s.2
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 573 | 573 | theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by | rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
#align_import set_theory.game.impartial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2e0975f6a25dd3fbfb9e41556a77f075f6269748"
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
def ImpartialAux : PGame → Prop
| G => (G ≈ -G) ∧ (∀ i, ImpartialAux (G.moveLeft i)) ∧ ∀ j, ImpartialAux (G.moveRight j)
termination_by G => G -- Porting note: Added `termination_by`
#align pgame.impartial_aux SetTheory.PGame.ImpartialAux
theorem impartialAux_def {G : PGame} :
G.ImpartialAux ↔
(G ≈ -G) ∧ (∀ i, ImpartialAux (G.moveLeft i)) ∧ ∀ j, ImpartialAux (G.moveRight j) := by
rw [ImpartialAux]
#align pgame.impartial_aux_def SetTheory.PGame.impartialAux_def
class Impartial (G : PGame) : Prop where
out : ImpartialAux G
#align pgame.impartial SetTheory.PGame.Impartial
theorem impartial_iff_aux {G : PGame} : G.Impartial ↔ G.ImpartialAux :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align pgame.impartial_iff_aux SetTheory.PGame.impartial_iff_aux
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Impartial.lean | 50 | 52 | theorem impartial_def {G : PGame} :
G.Impartial ↔ (G ≈ -G) ∧ (∀ i, Impartial (G.moveLeft i)) ∧ ∀ j, Impartial (G.moveRight j) := by |
simpa only [impartial_iff_aux] using impartialAux_def
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
#align_import analysis.sum_integral_comparisons from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
open Set MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace
variable {x₀ : ℝ} {a b : ℕ} {f : ℝ → ℝ}
| Mathlib/Analysis/SumIntegralComparisons.lean | 47 | 70 | theorem AntitoneOn.integral_le_sum (hf : AntitoneOn f (Icc x₀ (x₀ + a))) :
(∫ x in x₀..x₀ + a, f x) ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range a, f (x₀ + i) := by |
have hint : ∀ k : ℕ, k < a → IntervalIntegrable f volume (x₀ + k) (x₀ + (k + 1 : ℕ)) := by
intro k hk
refine (hf.mono ?_).intervalIntegrable
rw [uIcc_of_le]
· apply Icc_subset_Icc
· simp only [le_add_iff_nonneg_right, Nat.cast_nonneg]
· simp only [add_le_add_iff_left, Nat.cast_le, Nat.succ_le_of_lt hk]
· simp only [add_le_add_iff_left, Nat.cast_le, Nat.le_succ]
calc
∫ x in x₀..x₀ + a, f x = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range a, ∫ x in x₀ + i..x₀ + (i + 1 : ℕ), f x := by
convert (intervalIntegral.sum_integral_adjacent_intervals hint).symm
simp only [Nat.cast_zero, add_zero]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ Finset.range a, ∫ _ in x₀ + i..x₀ + (i + 1 : ℕ), f (x₀ + i) := by
apply Finset.sum_le_sum fun i hi => ?_
have ia : i < a := Finset.mem_range.1 hi
refine intervalIntegral.integral_mono_on (by simp) (hint _ ia) (by simp) fun x hx => ?_
apply hf _ _ hx.1
· simp only [ia.le, mem_Icc, le_add_iff_nonneg_right, Nat.cast_nonneg, add_le_add_iff_left,
Nat.cast_le, and_self_iff]
· refine mem_Icc.2 ⟨le_trans (by simp) hx.1, le_trans hx.2 ?_⟩
simp only [add_le_add_iff_left, Nat.cast_le, Nat.succ_le_of_lt ia]
_ = ∑ i ∈ Finset.range a, f (x₀ + i) := by simp
|
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
#align_import algebra.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a07d750983b94c530ab69a726862c2ab6802b38c"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
variable {α β G M : Type*}
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
#align comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative CommMagma.to_isCommutative
#align add_comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative AddCommMagma.to_isCommutative
section MulOneClass
variable {M : Type u} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h:P <;> simp [h]
#align ite_mul_one ite_mul_one
#align ite_add_zero ite_add_zero
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 153 | 155 | theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by |
by_cases h:P <;> simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.type from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47adfab39a11a072db552f47594bf8ed2cf8a722"
namespace Equiv.Perm
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type Equiv.Perm.cycleType
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_def Equiv.Perm.cycleType_def
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq' Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq'
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, (· ∘ ·)]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq_zero Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq_zero
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_one Equiv.Perm.cycleType_one
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
#align equiv.perm.card_cycle_type_eq_zero Equiv.Perm.card_cycleType_eq_zero
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
#align equiv.perm.two_le_of_mem_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.two_le_of_mem_cycleType
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
#align equiv.perm.one_lt_of_mem_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.one_lt_of_mem_cycleType
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = [σ.support.card] :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle.cycle_type Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.cycleType
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 110 | 119 | theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by |
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use σ.support.card, σ
simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
open Finset
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} [DecidableEq V] (G : SimpleGraph V) (s t : V)
namespace Iso
variable {G} {W : Type*} {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G ≃g G')
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Operations.lean | 35 | 39 | theorem card_edgeFinset_eq [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G'.edgeSet] :
G.edgeFinset.card = G'.edgeFinset.card := by |
apply Finset.card_eq_of_equiv
simp only [Set.mem_toFinset]
exact f.mapEdgeSet
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.GeometryOfNumbers
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.VolumeOfBalls
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.Basic
#align_import number_theory.number_field.canonical_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60da01b41bbe4206f05d34fd70c8dd7498717a30"
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace FiniteDimensional
local notation "E" K =>
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
section convexBodyLT'
open Metric ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Classical
variable (f : InfinitePlace K → ℝ≥0) (w₀ : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w})
abbrev convexBodyLT' : Set (E K) :=
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w } ↦ ball 0 (f w))) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi (fun w : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w } ↦
if w = w₀ then {x | |x.re| < 1 ∧ |x.im| < (f w : ℝ) ^ 2} else ball 0 (f w)))
theorem convexBodyLT'_mem {x : K} :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀ ↔
(∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w ≠ w₀ → w x < f w) ∧
|(w₀.val.embedding x).re| < 1 ∧ |(w₀.val.embedding x).im| < (f w₀: ℝ) ^ 2 := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ,
forall_true_left, Pi.ringHom_apply, apply_ite, mem_ball_zero_iff, ← Complex.norm_real,
embedding_of_isReal_apply, norm_embedding_eq, Subtype.forall, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨fun w h_ne ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ ⟨fun w hw ↦ ?_, fun w hw ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· by_cases hw : IsReal w
· exact norm_embedding_eq w _ ▸ h₁ w hw
· specialize h₂ w (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw)
rwa [if_neg (by exact Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_ne)] at h₂
· simpa [if_true] using h₂ w₀.val w₀.prop
· exact h₁ w (ne_of_isReal_isComplex hw w₀.prop)
· by_cases h_ne : w = w₀
· simpa [h_ne]
· rw [if_neg (by exact Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 h_ne)]
exact h₁ w h_ne
theorem convexBodyLT'_neg_mem (x : E K) (hx : x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀) :
-x ∈ convexBodyLT' K f w₀ := by
simp [Set.mem_prod, Prod.fst_neg, Set.mem_pi, Set.mem_univ, Pi.neg_apply,
mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_neg, Real.norm_eq_abs, forall_true_left, Subtype.forall,
Prod.snd_neg, Complex.norm_eq_abs] at hx ⊢
convert hx using 3
split_ifs <;> simp
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/ConvexBody.lean | 196 | 202 | theorem convexBodyLT'_convex : Convex ℝ (convexBodyLT' K f w₀) := by |
refine Convex.prod (convex_pi (fun _ _ => convex_ball _ _)) (convex_pi (fun _ _ => ?_))
split_ifs
· simp_rw [abs_lt]
refine Convex.inter ((convex_halfspace_re_gt _).inter (convex_halfspace_re_lt _))
((convex_halfspace_im_gt _).inter (convex_halfspace_im_lt _))
· exact convex_ball _ _
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.jacobi_symbol from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74a27133cf29446a0983779e37c8f829a85368f3"
section Jacobi
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.factors.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf => prime_of_mem_factors pf).prod
#align jacobi_sym jacobiSym
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
-- Porting note: Without the following line, Lean expected `|` on several lines, e.g. line 102.
open NumberTheorySymbols
namespace jacobiSym
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, factors_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
#align jacobi_sym.zero_right jacobiSym.zero_right
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, factors_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
#align jacobi_sym.one_right jacobiSym.one_right
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, factors_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one, List.pmap]
#align legendre_sym.to_jacobi_sym jacobiSym.legendreSym.to_jacobiSym
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_factors_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append, List.prod_append]
case h => exact fun p hp => (List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_factors prime_of_mem_factors
case _ => rfl
#align jacobi_sym.mul_right' jacobiSym.mul_right'
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
#align jacobi_sym.mul_right jacobiSym.mul_right
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom.mrange.copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm];
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_factors hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
#align jacobi_sym.trichotomy jacobiSym.trichotomy
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
-- Porting note: The line 150 was added because Lean does not synthesize the instance
-- `[Fact (Nat.Prime p)]` automatically (it is needed for `legendreSym.at_one`)
letI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_factors hp⟩
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
#align jacobi_sym.one_left jacobiSym.one_left
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _];
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (factors b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_factors x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_factors x.2} a₂)
#align jacobi_sym.mul_left jacobiSym.mul_left
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
-- Porting note: Initially, `and_assoc'` and `and_comm'` were used on line 164 but they have
-- been deprecated so we replace them with `and_assoc` and `and_comm`
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_factors (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, and_comm])
#align jacobi_sym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
cases' eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
#align jacobi_sym.ne_zero jacobiSym.ne_zero
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
#align jacobi_sym.eq_zero_iff jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_ofNat]; exact hb.ne'
#align jacobi_sym.zero_left jacobiSym.zero_left
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
#align jacobi_sym.eq_one_or_neg_one jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
#align jacobi_sym.pow_left jacobiSym.pow_left
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction' e with e ih
· rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
· cases' eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
#align jacobi_sym.pow_right jacobiSym.pow_right
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
cases' eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
#align jacobi_sym.sq_one jacobiSym.sq_one
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 227 | 227 | theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by | rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.factorial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
namespace Nat
def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| succ n => succ n * factorial n
#align nat.factorial Nat.factorial
scoped notation:10000 n "!" => Nat.factorial n
section Factorial
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_zero Nat.factorial_zero
theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n ! :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_succ Nat.factorial_succ
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_one Nat.factorial_one
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_two Nat.factorial_two
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : 0 < n) : n * (n - 1)! = n ! :=
Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hn) ▸ rfl
#align nat.mul_factorial_pred Nat.mul_factorial_pred
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| succ n => Nat.mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
#align nat.factorial_pos Nat.factorial_pos
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n ! ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
#align nat.factorial_ne_zero Nat.factorial_ne_zero
theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ∣ n ! := by
induction' h with n _ ih
· exact Nat.dvd_refl _
· exact Nat.dvd_trans ih (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align nat.factorial_dvd_factorial Nat.factorial_dvd_factorial
theorem dvd_factorial : ∀ {m n}, 0 < m → m ≤ n → m ∣ n !
| succ _, _, _, h => Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
#align nat.dvd_factorial Nat.dvd_factorial
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem factorial_le {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ≤ n ! :=
le_of_dvd (factorial_pos _) (factorial_dvd_factorial h)
#align nat.factorial_le Nat.factorial_le
theorem factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial : ∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ! * (m + 1) ^ n ≤ (m + n)!
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n + 1 => by
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm (_ + 1), Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial (succ_le_succ (le_add_right _ _))
#align nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial Nat.factorial_mul_pow_le_factorial
theorem factorial_lt (hn : 0 < n) : n ! < m ! ↔ n < m := by
refine ⟨fun h => not_le.mp fun hmn => Nat.not_le_of_lt h (factorial_le hmn), fun h => ?_⟩
have : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → n ! < (n + 1)! := by
intro k hk
rw [factorial_succ, succ_mul, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos]
exact Nat.mul_pos hk k.factorial_pos
induction' h with k hnk ih generalizing hn
· exact this hn
· exact lt_trans (ih hn) $ this <| lt_trans hn <| lt_of_succ_le hnk
#align nat.factorial_lt Nat.factorial_lt
@[gcongr]
lemma factorial_lt_of_lt {m n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (h : n < m) : n ! < m ! := (factorial_lt hn).mpr h
@[simp] lemma one_lt_factorial : 1 < n ! ↔ 1 < n := factorial_lt Nat.one_pos
#align nat.one_lt_factorial Nat.one_lt_factorial
@[simp]
theorem factorial_eq_one : n ! = 1 ↔ n ≤ 1 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← not_lt, ← one_lt_factorial, h]
apply lt_irrefl
· rintro (_|_|_) <;> rfl
#align nat.factorial_eq_one Nat.factorial_eq_one
theorem factorial_inj (hn : 1 < n) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, congr_arg _⟩
obtain hnm | rfl | hnm := lt_trichotomy n m
· rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
· rfl
rw [← one_lt_factorial, h, one_lt_factorial] at hn
rw [← factorial_lt <| lt_of_succ_lt hn, h] at hnm
cases lt_irrefl _ hnm
#align nat.factorial_inj Nat.factorial_inj
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Basic.lean | 132 | 135 | theorem factorial_inj' (h : 1 < n ∨ 1 < m) : n ! = m ! ↔ n = m := by |
obtain hn|hm := h
· exact factorial_inj hn
· rw [eq_comm, factorial_inj hm, eq_comm]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.BesicovitchVectorSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.ApproximatesLinearOn
#align_import measure_theory.function.jacobian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b84aee748341da06a6d78491367e2c0e9f15e8a5"
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Filter Set FiniteDimensional Asymptotics
TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology Pointwise
variable {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {s : Set E} {f : E → E} {f' : E → E →L[ℝ] E}
theorem exists_closed_cover_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt [SecondCountableTopology F]
(f : E → F) (s : Set E) (f' : E → E →L[ℝ] F) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x)
(r : (E →L[ℝ] F) → ℝ≥0) (rpos : ∀ A, r A ≠ 0) :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] F),
(∀ n, IsClosed (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) ∧
(∀ n, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (r (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) := by
-- exclude the trivial case where `s` is empty
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· refine ⟨fun _ => ∅, fun _ => 0, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;> simp
-- we will use countably many linear maps. Select these from all the derivatives since the
-- space of linear maps is second-countable
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ :
∃ T : Set s,
T.Countable ∧ ⋃ x ∈ T, ball (f' (x : E)) (r (f' x)) = ⋃ x : s, ball (f' x) (r (f' x)) :=
TopologicalSpace.isOpen_iUnion_countable _ fun x => isOpen_ball
-- fix a sequence `u` of positive reals tending to zero.
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
-- `M n z` is the set of points `x` such that `f y - f x` is close to `f' z (y - x)` for `y`
-- in the ball of radius `u n` around `x`.
let M : ℕ → T → Set E := fun n z =>
{x | x ∈ s ∧ ∀ y ∈ s ∩ ball x (u n), ‖f y - f x - f' z (y - x)‖ ≤ r (f' z) * ‖y - x‖}
-- As `f` is differentiable everywhere on `s`, the sets `M n z` cover `s` by design.
have s_subset : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ (n : ℕ) (z : T), x ∈ M n z := by
intro x xs
obtain ⟨z, zT, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ T, f' x ∈ ball (f' (z : E)) (r (f' z)) := by
have : f' x ∈ ⋃ z ∈ T, ball (f' (z : E)) (r (f' z)) := by
rw [hT]
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, xs⟩, ?_⟩
simpa only [mem_ball, Subtype.coe_mk, dist_self] using (rpos (f' x)).bot_lt
rwa [mem_iUnion₂, bex_def] at this
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ‖f' x - f' z‖ + ε ≤ r (f' z) := by
refine ⟨r (f' z) - ‖f' x - f' z‖, ?_, le_of_eq (by abel)⟩
simpa only [sub_pos] using mem_ball_iff_norm.mp hz
obtain ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩ :
∃ (δ : ℝ), 0 < δ ∧ ball x δ ∩ s ⊆ {y | ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖} :=
Metric.mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 ((hf' x xs).isLittleO.def εpos)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < δ := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ δpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ⟨z, zT⟩, ⟨xs, ?_⟩⟩
intro y hy
calc
‖f y - f x - (f' z) (y - x)‖ = ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x) + (f' x - f' z) (y - x)‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sub', map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
abel
_ ≤ ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ + ‖(f' x - f' z) (y - x)‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖ + ‖f' x - f' z‖ * ‖y - x‖ := by
refine add_le_add (hδ ?_) (ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm _ _)
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (ball_subset_ball hn.le) hy
_ ≤ r (f' z) * ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [← add_mul, add_comm]
gcongr
-- the sets `M n z` are relatively closed in `s`, as all the conditions defining it are clearly
-- closed
have closure_M_subset : ∀ n z, s ∩ closure (M n z) ⊆ M n z := by
rintro n z x ⟨xs, hx⟩
refine ⟨xs, fun y hy => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, aM, a_lim⟩ : ∃ a : ℕ → E, (∀ k, a k ∈ M n z) ∧ Tendsto a atTop (𝓝 x) :=
mem_closure_iff_seq_limit.1 hx
have L1 :
Tendsto (fun k : ℕ => ‖f y - f (a k) - (f' z) (y - a k)‖) atTop
(𝓝 ‖f y - f x - (f' z) (y - x)‖) := by
apply Tendsto.norm
have L : Tendsto (fun k => f (a k)) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
apply (hf' x xs).continuousWithinAt.tendsto.comp
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ a_lim
exact eventually_of_forall fun k => (aM k).1
apply Tendsto.sub (tendsto_const_nhds.sub L)
exact ((f' z).continuous.tendsto _).comp (tendsto_const_nhds.sub a_lim)
have L2 : Tendsto (fun k : ℕ => (r (f' z) : ℝ) * ‖y - a k‖) atTop (𝓝 (r (f' z) * ‖y - x‖)) :=
(tendsto_const_nhds.sub a_lim).norm.const_mul _
have I : ∀ᶠ k in atTop, ‖f y - f (a k) - (f' z) (y - a k)‖ ≤ r (f' z) * ‖y - a k‖ := by
have L : Tendsto (fun k => dist y (a k)) atTop (𝓝 (dist y x)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.dist a_lim
filter_upwards [(tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ hy.2]
intro k hk
exact (aM k).2 y ⟨hy.1, hk⟩
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto L1 L2 I
-- choose a dense sequence `d p`
rcases TopologicalSpace.exists_dense_seq E with ⟨d, hd⟩
-- split `M n z` into subsets `K n z p` of small diameters by intersecting with the ball
-- `closedBall (d p) (u n / 3)`.
let K : ℕ → T → ℕ → Set E := fun n z p => closure (M n z) ∩ closedBall (d p) (u n / 3)
-- on the sets `K n z p`, the map `f` is well approximated by `f' z` by design.
have K_approx : ∀ (n) (z : T) (p), ApproximatesLinearOn f (f' z) (s ∩ K n z p) (r (f' z)) := by
intro n z p x hx y hy
have yM : y ∈ M n z := closure_M_subset _ _ ⟨hy.1, hy.2.1⟩
refine yM.2 _ ⟨hx.1, ?_⟩
calc
dist x y ≤ dist x (d p) + dist y (d p) := dist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ ≤ u n / 3 + u n / 3 := add_le_add hx.2.2 hy.2.2
_ < u n := by linarith [u_pos n]
-- the sets `K n z p` are also closed, again by design.
have K_closed : ∀ (n) (z : T) (p), IsClosed (K n z p) := fun n z p =>
isClosed_closure.inter isClosed_ball
-- reindex the sets `K n z p`, to let them only depend on an integer parameter `q`.
obtain ⟨F, hF⟩ : ∃ F : ℕ → ℕ × T × ℕ, Function.Surjective F := by
haveI : Encodable T := T_count.toEncodable
have : Nonempty T := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases s_subset x xs with ⟨n, z, _⟩
exact ⟨z⟩
inhabit ↥T
exact ⟨_, Encodable.surjective_decode_iget (ℕ × T × ℕ)⟩
-- these sets `t q = K n z p` will do
refine
⟨fun q => K (F q).1 (F q).2.1 (F q).2.2, fun q => f' (F q).2.1, fun n => K_closed _ _ _,
fun x xs => ?_, fun q => K_approx _ _ _, fun _ q => ⟨(F q).2.1, (F q).2.1.1.2, rfl⟩⟩
-- the only fact that needs further checking is that they cover `s`.
-- we already know that any point `x ∈ s` belongs to a set `M n z`.
obtain ⟨n, z, hnz⟩ : ∃ (n : ℕ) (z : T), x ∈ M n z := s_subset x xs
-- by density, it also belongs to a ball `closedBall (d p) (u n / 3)`.
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ : ∃ p : ℕ, x ∈ closedBall (d p) (u n / 3) := by
have : Set.Nonempty (ball x (u n / 3)) := by simp only [nonempty_ball]; linarith [u_pos n]
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ : ∃ p : ℕ, d p ∈ ball x (u n / 3) := hd.exists_mem_open isOpen_ball this
exact ⟨p, (mem_ball'.1 hp).le⟩
-- choose `q` for which `t q = K n z p`.
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ : ∃ q, F q = (n, z, p) := hF _
-- then `x` belongs to `t q`.
apply mem_iUnion.2 ⟨q, _⟩
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [K, hq, mem_inter_iff, hp, and_true]
exact subset_closure hnz
#align exists_closed_cover_approximates_linear_on_of_has_fderiv_within_at exists_closed_cover_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] (μ : Measure E) [IsAddHaarMeasure μ]
theorem exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt [SecondCountableTopology F]
(f : E → F) (s : Set E) (f' : E → E →L[ℝ] F) (hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x)
(r : (E →L[ℝ] F) → ℝ≥0) (rpos : ∀ A, r A ≠ 0) :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] F),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n) ∧
(∀ n, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (r (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) := by
rcases exists_closed_cover_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' r rpos with
⟨t, A, t_closed, st, t_approx, ht⟩
refine
⟨disjointed t, A, disjoint_disjointed _,
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => (t_closed n).measurableSet, ?_, ?_, ht⟩
· rw [iUnion_disjointed]; exact st
· intro n; exact (t_approx n).mono_set (inter_subset_inter_right _ (disjointed_subset _ _))
#align exists_partition_approximates_linear_on_of_has_fderiv_within_at exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt
namespace MeasureTheory
theorem addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt (A : E →L[ℝ] E) {m : ℝ≥0}
(hm : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0),
∀ (s : Set E) (f : E → E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A s δ → μ (f '' s) ≤ m * μ s := by
apply nhdsWithin_le_nhds
let d := ENNReal.ofReal |A.det|
-- construct a small neighborhood of `A '' (closedBall 0 1)` with measure comparable to
-- the determinant of `A`.
obtain ⟨ε, hε, εpos⟩ :
∃ ε : ℝ, μ (closedBall 0 ε + A '' closedBall 0 1) < m * μ (closedBall 0 1) ∧ 0 < ε := by
have HC : IsCompact (A '' closedBall 0 1) :=
(ProperSpace.isCompact_closedBall _ _).image A.continuous
have L0 :
Tendsto (fun ε => μ (cthickening ε (A '' closedBall 0 1))) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (μ (A '' closedBall 0 1))) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds
exact tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isCompact HC
have L1 :
Tendsto (fun ε => μ (closedBall 0 ε + A '' closedBall 0 1)) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (μ (A '' closedBall 0 1))) := by
apply L0.congr' _
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with r hr
rw [← HC.add_closedBall_zero (le_of_lt hr), add_comm]
have L2 :
Tendsto (fun ε => μ (closedBall 0 ε + A '' closedBall 0 1)) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 (d * μ (closedBall 0 1))) := by
convert L1
exact (addHaar_image_continuousLinearMap _ _ _).symm
have I : d * μ (closedBall 0 1) < m * μ (closedBall 0 1) :=
(ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_right (measure_closedBall_pos μ _ zero_lt_one).ne'
measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne).2
hm
have H :
∀ᶠ b : ℝ in 𝓝[>] 0, μ (closedBall 0 b + A '' closedBall 0 1) < m * μ (closedBall 0 1) :=
(tendsto_order.1 L2).2 _ I
exact (H.and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have : Iio (⟨ε, εpos.le⟩ : ℝ≥0) ∈ 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0) := by apply Iio_mem_nhds; exact εpos
filter_upwards [this]
-- fix a function `f` which is close enough to `A`.
intro δ hδ s f hf
simp only [mem_Iio, ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk] at hδ
-- This function expands the volume of any ball by at most `m`
have I : ∀ x r, x ∈ s → 0 ≤ r → μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall x r)) ≤ m * μ (closedBall x r) := by
intro x r xs r0
have K : f '' (s ∩ closedBall x r) ⊆ A '' closedBall 0 r + closedBall (f x) (ε * r) := by
rintro y ⟨z, ⟨zs, zr⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm] at zr
apply Set.mem_add.2 ⟨A (z - x), _, f z - f x - A (z - x) + f x, _, _⟩
· apply mem_image_of_mem
simpa only [dist_eq_norm, mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, sub_zero] using zr
· rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm, add_sub_cancel_right]
calc
‖f z - f x - A (z - x)‖ ≤ δ * ‖z - x‖ := hf _ zs _ xs
_ ≤ ε * r := by gcongr
· simp only [map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
abel
have :
A '' closedBall 0 r + closedBall (f x) (ε * r) =
{f x} + r • (A '' closedBall 0 1 + closedBall 0 ε) := by
rw [smul_add, ← add_assoc, add_comm {f x}, add_assoc, smul_closedBall _ _ εpos.le, smul_zero,
singleton_add_closedBall_zero, ← image_smul_set ℝ E E A, smul_closedBall _ _ zero_le_one,
smul_zero, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg r0, mul_one, mul_comm]
rw [this] at K
calc
μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall x r)) ≤ μ ({f x} + r • (A '' closedBall 0 1 + closedBall 0 ε)) :=
measure_mono K
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (A '' closedBall 0 1 + closedBall 0 ε) := by
simp only [abs_of_nonneg r0, addHaar_smul, image_add_left, abs_pow, singleton_add,
measure_preimage_add]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (r ^ finrank ℝ E) * (m * μ (closedBall 0 1)) := by
rw [add_comm]; gcongr
_ = m * μ (closedBall x r) := by simp only [addHaar_closedBall' μ _ r0]; ring
-- covering `s` by closed balls with total measure very close to `μ s`, one deduces that the
-- measure of `f '' s` is at most `m * (μ s + a)` for any positive `a`.
have J : ∀ᶠ a in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞), μ (f '' s) ≤ m * (μ s + a) := by
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with a ha
rw [mem_Ioi] at ha
obtain ⟨t, r, t_count, ts, rpos, st, μt⟩ :
∃ (t : Set E) (r : E → ℝ),
t.Countable ∧
t ⊆ s ∧
(∀ x : E, x ∈ t → 0 < r x) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) ∧
(∑' x : ↥t, μ (closedBall (↑x) (r ↑x))) ≤ μ s + a :=
Besicovitch.exists_closedBall_covering_tsum_measure_le μ ha.ne' (fun _ => Ioi 0) s
fun x _ δ δpos => ⟨δ / 2, by simp [half_pos δpos, δpos]⟩
haveI : Encodable t := t_count.toEncodable
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ x : t, f '' (s ∩ closedBall x (r x))) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion] at st
apply measure_mono
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
exact image_subset _ (subset_inter (Subset.refl _) st)
_ ≤ ∑' x : t, μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall x (r x))) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' x : t, m * μ (closedBall x (r x)) :=
(ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => I x (r x) (ts x.2) (rpos x x.2).le)
_ ≤ m * (μ s + a) := by rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]; gcongr
-- taking the limit in `a`, one obtains the conclusion
have L : Tendsto (fun a => (m : ℝ≥0∞) * (μ s + a)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (m * (μ s + 0))) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_const_nhds.add tendsto_id)
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
rw [add_zero] at L
exact ge_of_tendsto L J
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt
theorem mul_le_addHaar_image_of_lt_det (A : E →L[ℝ] E) {m : ℝ≥0}
(hm : (m : ℝ≥0∞) < ENNReal.ofReal |A.det|) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0),
∀ (s : Set E) (f : E → E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A s δ → (m : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ μ (f '' s) := by
apply nhdsWithin_le_nhds
-- The assumption `hm` implies that `A` is invertible. If `f` is close enough to `A`, it is also
-- invertible. One can then pass to the inverses, and deduce the estimate from
-- `addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt` applied to `f⁻¹` and `A⁻¹`.
-- exclude first the trivial case where `m = 0`.
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (zero_le m) with (rfl | mpos)
· filter_upwards
simp only [forall_const, zero_mul, imp_true_iff, zero_le, ENNReal.coe_zero]
have hA : A.det ≠ 0 := by
intro h; simp only [h, ENNReal.not_lt_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, abs_zero] at hm
-- let `B` be the continuous linear equiv version of `A`.
let B := A.toContinuousLinearEquivOfDetNeZero hA
-- the determinant of `B.symm` is bounded by `m⁻¹`
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E).det| < (m⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, abs_inv, Real.toNNReal_inv, ContinuousLinearEquiv.det_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_toContinuousLinearEquivOfDetNeZero, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe] at hm ⊢
exact NNReal.inv_lt_inv mpos.ne' hm
-- therefore, we may apply `addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt` to `B.symm` and `m⁻¹`.
obtain ⟨δ₀, δ₀pos, hδ₀⟩ :
∃ δ : ℝ≥0,
0 < δ ∧
∀ (t : Set E) (g : E → E),
ApproximatesLinearOn g (B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E) t δ → μ (g '' t) ≤ ↑m⁻¹ * μ t := by
have :
∀ᶠ δ : ℝ≥0 in 𝓝[>] 0,
∀ (t : Set E) (g : E → E),
ApproximatesLinearOn g (B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E) t δ → μ (g '' t) ≤ ↑m⁻¹ * μ t :=
addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ B.symm I
rcases (this.and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ₀, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨δ₀, h', h⟩
-- record smallness conditions for `δ` that will be needed to apply `hδ₀` below.
have L1 : ∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0), Subsingleton E ∨ δ < ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ := by
by_cases h : Subsingleton E
· simp only [h, true_or_iff, eventually_const]
simp only [h, false_or_iff]
apply Iio_mem_nhds
simpa only [h, false_or_iff, inv_pos] using B.subsingleton_or_nnnorm_symm_pos
have L2 :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0), ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ * (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ - δ)⁻¹ * δ < δ₀ := by
have :
Tendsto (fun δ => ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ * (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ - δ)⁻¹ * δ) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ * (‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊⁻¹ - 0)⁻¹ * 0)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne ‖(B.symm : E →L[ℝ] E)‖₊ 0 with (H | H)
· simpa only [H, zero_mul] using tendsto_const_nhds
refine Tendsto.mul (tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_) tendsto_id
refine (Tendsto.sub tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_id).inv₀ ?_
simpa only [tsub_zero, inv_eq_zero, Ne] using H
simp only [mul_zero] at this
exact (tendsto_order.1 this).2 δ₀ δ₀pos
-- let `δ` be small enough, and `f` approximated by `B` up to `δ`.
filter_upwards [L1, L2]
intro δ h1δ h2δ s f hf
have hf' : ApproximatesLinearOn f (B : E →L[ℝ] E) s δ := by convert hf
let F := hf'.toPartialEquiv h1δ
-- the condition to be checked can be reformulated in terms of the inverse maps
suffices H : μ (F.symm '' F.target) ≤ (m⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) * μ F.target by
change (m : ℝ≥0∞) * μ F.source ≤ μ F.target
rwa [← F.symm_image_target_eq_source, mul_comm, ← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_comm, ← ENNReal.coe_inv mpos.ne']
· apply Or.inl
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using mpos.ne'
· simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
-- as `f⁻¹` is well approximated by `B⁻¹`, the conclusion follows from `hδ₀`
-- and our choice of `δ`.
exact hδ₀ _ _ ((hf'.to_inv h1δ).mono_num h2δ.le)
#align measure_theory.mul_le_add_haar_image_of_lt_det MeasureTheory.mul_le_addHaar_image_of_lt_det
theorem _root_.ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le {A : E →L[ℝ] E} {δ : ℝ≥0}
(hf : ApproximatesLinearOn f A s δ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (f' : E → E →L[ℝ] E)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f' x - A‖₊ ≤ δ := by
filter_upwards [Besicovitch.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div μ s, ae_restrict_mem hs]
-- start from a Lebesgue density point `x`, belonging to `s`.
intro x hx xs
-- consider an arbitrary vector `z`.
apply ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ δ.2 fun z => ?_
-- to show that `‖(f' x - A) z‖ ≤ δ ‖z‖`, it suffices to do it up to some error that vanishes
-- asymptotically in terms of `ε > 0`.
suffices H : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ‖(f' x - A) z‖ ≤ (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ε by
have :
Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ => ((δ : ℝ) + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ε) (𝓝[>] 0)
(𝓝 ((δ + 0) * (‖z‖ + 0) + ‖f' x - A‖ * 0)) :=
Tendsto.mono_left (Continuous.tendsto (by continuity) 0) nhdsWithin_le_nhds
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero] at this
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto tendsto_const_nhds this
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
exact H
-- fix a positive `ε`.
intro ε εpos
-- for small enough `r`, the rescaled ball `r • closedBall z ε` intersects `s`, as `x` is a
-- density point
have B₁ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ), (s ∩ ({x} + r • closedBall z ε)).Nonempty :=
eventually_nonempty_inter_smul_of_density_one μ s x hx _ measurableSet_closedBall
(measure_closedBall_pos μ z εpos).ne'
obtain ⟨ρ, ρpos, hρ⟩ :
∃ ρ > 0, ball x ρ ∩ s ⊆ {y : E | ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖} :=
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.1 ((hf' x xs).isLittleO.def εpos)
-- for small enough `r`, the rescaled ball `r • closedBall z ε` is included in the set where
-- `f y - f x` is well approximated by `f' x (y - x)`.
have B₂ : ∀ᶠ r in 𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ), {x} + r • closedBall z ε ⊆ ball x ρ := by
apply nhdsWithin_le_nhds
exact eventually_singleton_add_smul_subset isBounded_closedBall (ball_mem_nhds x ρpos)
-- fix a small positive `r` satisfying the above properties, as well as a corresponding `y`.
obtain ⟨r, ⟨y, ⟨ys, hy⟩⟩, rρ, rpos⟩ :
∃ r : ℝ,
(s ∩ ({x} + r • closedBall z ε)).Nonempty ∧ {x} + r • closedBall z ε ⊆ ball x ρ ∧ 0 < r :=
(B₁.and (B₂.and self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists
-- write `y = x + r a` with `a ∈ closedBall z ε`.
obtain ⟨a, az, ya⟩ : ∃ a, a ∈ closedBall z ε ∧ y = x + r • a := by
simp only [mem_smul_set, image_add_left, mem_preimage, singleton_add] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨a, az, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, az, by simp only [ha, add_neg_cancel_left]⟩
have norm_a : ‖a‖ ≤ ‖z‖ + ε :=
calc
‖a‖ = ‖z + (a - z)‖ := by simp only [add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ ‖z‖ + ‖a - z‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ‖z‖ + ε := add_le_add_left (mem_closedBall_iff_norm.1 az) _
-- use the approximation properties to control `(f' x - A) a`, and then `(f' x - A) z` as `z` is
-- close to `a`.
have I : r * ‖(f' x - A) a‖ ≤ r * (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) :=
calc
r * ‖(f' x - A) a‖ = ‖(f' x - A) (r • a)‖ := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg rpos.le]
_ = ‖f y - f x - A (y - x) - (f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x))‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [ya, add_sub_cancel_left, sub_sub_sub_cancel_left, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sub',
eq_self_iff_true, sub_left_inj, Pi.sub_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.map_smul, smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖f y - f x - A (y - x)‖ + ‖f y - f x - (f' x) (y - x)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ * ‖y - x‖ + ε * ‖y - x‖ := (add_le_add (hf _ ys _ xs) (hρ ⟨rρ hy, ys⟩))
_ = r * (δ + ε) * ‖a‖ := by
simp only [ya, add_sub_cancel_left, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg rpos.le]
ring
_ ≤ r * (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) := by gcongr
calc
‖(f' x - A) z‖ = ‖(f' x - A) a + (f' x - A) (z - a)‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sub', map_sub, Pi.sub_apply]
abel
_ ≤ ‖(f' x - A) a‖ + ‖(f' x - A) (z - a)‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ‖z - a‖ := by
apply add_le_add
· rw [mul_assoc] at I; exact (mul_le_mul_left rpos).1 I
· apply ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm
_ ≤ (δ + ε) * (‖z‖ + ε) + ‖f' x - A‖ * ε := by
rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm'] at az
gcongr
#align approximates_linear_on.norm_fderiv_sub_le ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le
theorem addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn_of_addHaar_eq_zero (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s)
(hs : μ s = 0) : μ (f '' s) = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
have :
∀ A : E →L[ℝ] E, ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧
∀ (t : Set E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A t δ →
μ (f '' t) ≤ (Real.toNNReal |A.det| + 1 : ℝ≥0) * μ t := by
intro A
let m : ℝ≥0 := Real.toNNReal |A.det| + 1
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m := by
simp only [m, ENNReal.ofReal, lt_add_iff_pos_right, zero_lt_one, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
rcases ((addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ A I).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨δ, h', fun t ht => h t f ht⟩
choose δ hδ using this
obtain ⟨t, A, _, _, t_cover, ht, -⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (δ (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = fderivWithin ℝ f s y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s (fderivWithin ℝ f s)
(fun x xs => (hf x xs).hasFDerivWithinAt) δ fun A => (hδ A).1.ne'
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ n, f '' (s ∩ t n)) := by
apply measure_mono
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
exact image_subset f (subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover)
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (f '' (s ∩ t n)) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (Real.toNNReal |(A n).det| + 1 : ℝ≥0) * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
apply ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_
apply (hδ (A n)).2
exact ht n
_ ≤ ∑' n, ((Real.toNNReal |(A n).det| + 1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) * 0 := by
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => mul_le_mul_left' ?_ _
exact le_trans (measure_mono inter_subset_left) (le_of_eq hs)
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, mul_zero]
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_eq_zero_of_differentiable_on_of_add_haar_eq_zero MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_differentiableOn_of_addHaar_eq_zero
theorem addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero_aux
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (R : ℝ) (hs : s ⊆ closedBall 0 R) (ε : ℝ≥0)
(εpos : 0 < ε) (h'f' : ∀ x ∈ s, (f' x).det = 0) : μ (f '' s) ≤ ε * μ (closedBall 0 R) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | h's); · simp only [measure_empty, zero_le, image_empty]
have :
∀ A : E →L[ℝ] E, ∃ δ : ℝ≥0, 0 < δ ∧
∀ (t : Set E), ApproximatesLinearOn f A t δ →
μ (f '' t) ≤ (Real.toNNReal |A.det| + ε : ℝ≥0) * μ t := by
intro A
let m : ℝ≥0 := Real.toNNReal |A.det| + ε
have I : ENNReal.ofReal |A.det| < m := by
simp only [m, ENNReal.ofReal, lt_add_iff_pos_right, εpos, ENNReal.coe_lt_coe]
rcases ((addHaar_image_le_mul_of_det_lt μ A I).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨δ, h, h'⟩
exact ⟨δ, h', fun t ht => h t f ht⟩
choose δ hδ using this
obtain ⟨t, A, t_disj, t_meas, t_cover, ht, Af'⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) (δ (A n))) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' δ fun A => (hδ A).1.ne'
calc
μ (f '' s) ≤ μ (⋃ n, f '' (s ∩ t n)) := by
rw [← image_iUnion, ← inter_iUnion]
gcongr
exact subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (f '' (s ∩ t n)) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ ∑' n, (Real.toNNReal |(A n).det| + ε : ℝ≥0) * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
gcongr
exact (hδ (A _)).2 _ (ht _)
_ = ∑' n, ε * μ (s ∩ t n) := by
congr with n
rcases Af' h's n with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
simp only [hy, h'f' y ys, Real.toNNReal_zero, abs_zero, zero_add]
_ ≤ ε * ∑' n, μ (closedBall 0 R ∩ t n) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
gcongr
_ = ε * μ (⋃ n, closedBall 0 R ∩ t n) := by
rw [measure_iUnion]
· exact pairwise_disjoint_mono t_disj fun n => inter_subset_right
· intro n
exact measurableSet_closedBall.inter (t_meas n)
_ ≤ ε * μ (closedBall 0 R) := by
rw [← inter_iUnion]
exact mul_le_mul_left' (measure_mono inter_subset_left) _
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderiv_within_eq_zero_aux MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero_aux
theorem addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) (h'f' : ∀ x ∈ s, (f' x).det = 0) :
μ (f '' s) = 0 := by
suffices H : ∀ R, μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall 0 R)) = 0 by
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
rw [← iUnion_inter_closedBall_nat s 0]
calc
μ (f '' ⋃ n : ℕ, s ∩ closedBall 0 n) ≤ ∑' n : ℕ, μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall 0 n)) := by
rw [image_iUnion]; exact measure_iUnion_le _
_ ≤ 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
intro R
have A : ∀ (ε : ℝ≥0), 0 < ε → μ (f '' (s ∩ closedBall 0 R)) ≤ ε * μ (closedBall 0 R) :=
fun ε εpos =>
addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero_aux μ
(fun x hx => (hf' x hx.1).mono inter_subset_left) R inter_subset_right ε εpos
fun x hx => h'f' x hx.1
have B : Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => (ε : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (closedBall 0 R)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) := by
have :
Tendsto (fun ε : ℝ≥0 => (ε : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (closedBall 0 R)) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (((0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (closedBall 0 R))) :=
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 tendsto_id)
(Or.inr measure_closedBall_lt_top.ne)
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.coe_zero] at this
exact Tendsto.mono_left this nhdsWithin_le_nhds
apply le_antisymm _ (zero_le _)
apply ge_of_tendsto B
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin]
exact A
#align measure_theory.add_haar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderiv_within_eq_zero MeasureTheory.addHaar_image_eq_zero_of_det_fderivWithin_eq_zero
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/Jacobian.lean | 694 | 748 | theorem aemeasurable_fderivWithin (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf' : ∀ x ∈ s, HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' x) s x) : AEMeasurable f' (μ.restrict s) := by |
/- It suffices to show that `f'` can be uniformly approximated by a measurable function.
Fix `ε > 0`. Thanks to `exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt`, one
can find a countable measurable partition of `s` into sets `s ∩ t n` on which `f` is well
approximated by linear maps `A n`. On almost all of `s ∩ t n`, it follows from
`ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le` that `f'` is uniformly approximated by `A n`, which
gives the conclusion. -/
-- fix a precision `ε`
refine aemeasurable_of_unif_approx fun ε εpos => ?_
let δ : ℝ≥0 := ⟨ε, le_of_lt εpos⟩
have δpos : 0 < δ := εpos
-- partition `s` into sets `s ∩ t n` on which `f` is approximated by linear maps `A n`.
obtain ⟨t, A, t_disj, t_meas, t_cover, ht, _⟩ :
∃ (t : ℕ → Set E) (A : ℕ → E →L[ℝ] E),
Pairwise (Disjoint on t) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, MeasurableSet (t n)) ∧
(s ⊆ ⋃ n : ℕ, t n) ∧
(∀ n : ℕ, ApproximatesLinearOn f (A n) (s ∩ t n) δ) ∧
(s.Nonempty → ∀ n, ∃ y ∈ s, A n = f' y) :=
exists_partition_approximatesLinearOn_of_hasFDerivWithinAt f s f' hf' (fun _ => δ) fun _ =>
δpos.ne'
-- define a measurable function `g` which coincides with `A n` on `t n`.
obtain ⟨g, g_meas, hg⟩ :
∃ g : E → E →L[ℝ] E, Measurable g ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ) (x : E), x ∈ t n → g x = A n :=
exists_measurable_piecewise t t_meas (fun n _ => A n) (fun n => measurable_const) <|
t_disj.mono fun i j h => by simp only [h.inter_eq, eqOn_empty]
refine ⟨g, g_meas.aemeasurable, ?_⟩
-- reduce to checking that `f'` and `g` are close on almost all of `s ∩ t n`, for all `n`.
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂sum fun n ↦ μ.restrict (s ∩ t n), dist (g x) (f' x) ≤ ε by
have : μ.restrict s ≤ sum fun n => μ.restrict (s ∩ t n) := by
have : s = ⋃ n, s ∩ t n := by
rw [← inter_iUnion]
exact Subset.antisymm (subset_inter Subset.rfl t_cover) inter_subset_left
conv_lhs => rw [this]
exact restrict_iUnion_le
exact ae_mono this H
-- fix such an `n`.
refine ae_sum_iff.2 fun n => ?_
-- on almost all `s ∩ t n`, `f' x` is close to `A n` thanks to
-- `ApproximatesLinearOn.norm_fderiv_sub_le`.
have E₁ : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂μ.restrict (s ∩ t n), ‖f' x - A n‖₊ ≤ δ :=
(ht n).norm_fderiv_sub_le μ (hs.inter (t_meas n)) f' fun x hx =>
(hf' x hx.1).mono inter_subset_left
-- moreover, `g x` is equal to `A n` there.
have E₂ : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂μ.restrict (s ∩ t n), g x = A n := by
suffices H : ∀ᵐ x : E ∂μ.restrict (t n), g x = A n from
ae_mono (restrict_mono inter_subset_right le_rfl) H
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (t_meas n)]
exact hg n
-- putting these two properties together gives the conclusion.
filter_upwards [E₁, E₂] with x hx1 hx2
rw [← nndist_eq_nnnorm] at hx1
rw [hx2, dist_comm]
exact hx1
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.list.sublists from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ccad6d5093bd2f5c6ca621fc74674cce51355af6"
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Nat
namespace List
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_nil : sublists' (@nil α) = [[]] :=
rfl
#align list.sublists'_nil List.sublists'_nil
@[simp]
theorem sublists'_singleton (a : α) : sublists' [a] = [[], [a]] :=
rfl
#align list.sublists'_singleton List.sublists'_singleton
#noalign list.map_sublists'_aux
#noalign list.sublists'_aux_append
#noalign list.sublists'_aux_eq_sublists'
-- Porting note: Not the same as `sublists'_aux` from Lean3
def sublists'Aux (a : α) (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)) : List (List α) :=
r₁.foldl (init := r₂) fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]
#align list.sublists'_aux List.sublists'Aux
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sublists.lean | 52 | 59 | theorem sublists'Aux_eq_array_foldl (a : α) : ∀ (r₁ r₂ : List (List α)),
sublists'Aux a r₁ r₂ = ((r₁.toArray).foldl (init := r₂.toArray)
(fun r l => r.push (a :: l))).toList := by |
intro r₁ r₂
rw [sublists'Aux, Array.foldl_eq_foldl_data]
have := List.foldl_hom Array.toList (fun r l => r.push (a :: l))
(fun r l => r ++ [a :: l]) r₁ r₂.toArray (by simp)
simpa using this
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConcreteCategory
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
#align_import topology.category.Top.limits.products from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
-- Porting note: every ML3 decl has an uppercase letter
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
abbrev piπ {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) : TopCat.of (∀ i, α i) ⟶ α i :=
⟨fun f => f i, continuous_apply i⟩
#align Top.pi_π TopCat.piπ
@[simps! pt π_app]
def piFan {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : Fan α :=
Fan.mk (TopCat.of (∀ i, α i)) (piπ.{v,u} α)
#align Top.pi_fan TopCat.piFan
def piFanIsLimit {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : IsLimit (piFan α) where
lift S :=
{ toFun := fun s i => S.π.app ⟨i⟩ s
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi (fun i => (S.π.app ⟨i⟩).2) }
uniq := by
intro S m h
apply ContinuousMap.ext; intro x
funext i
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
dsimp
rw [ContinuousMap.coe_mk, ← h ⟨i⟩]
rfl
fac s j := rfl
#align Top.pi_fan_is_limit TopCat.piFanIsLimit
def piIsoPi {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : ∏ᶜ α ≅ TopCat.of (∀ i, α i) :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (piFanIsLimit.{v, u} α)
-- Specifying the universes in `piFanIsLimit` wasn't necessary when we had `TopCatMax`
#align Top.pi_iso_pi TopCat.piIsoPi
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem piIsoPi_inv_π {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) :
(piIsoPi α).inv ≫ Pi.π α i = piπ α i := by simp [piIsoPi]
#align Top.pi_iso_pi_inv_π TopCat.piIsoPi_inv_π
theorem piIsoPi_inv_π_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
(Pi.π α i : _) ((piIsoPi α).inv x) = x i :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (piIsoPi_inv_π α i) x
#align Top.pi_iso_pi_inv_π_apply TopCat.piIsoPi_inv_π_apply
-- Porting note: needing the type ascription on `∏ᶜ α : TopCat.{max v u}` is unfortunate.
theorem piIsoPi_hom_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι)
(x : (∏ᶜ α : TopCat.{max v u})) : (piIsoPi α).hom x i = (Pi.π α i : _) x := by
have := piIsoPi_inv_π α i
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq] at this
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom this x
#align Top.pi_iso_pi_hom_apply TopCat.piIsoPi_hom_apply
-- Porting note: Lean doesn't automatically reduce TopCat.of X|>.α to X now
abbrev sigmaι {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) : α i ⟶ TopCat.of (Σi, α i) := by
refine ContinuousMap.mk ?_ ?_
· dsimp
apply Sigma.mk i
· dsimp; continuity
#align Top.sigma_ι TopCat.sigmaι
@[simps! pt ι_app]
def sigmaCofan {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : Cofan α :=
Cofan.mk (TopCat.of (Σi, α i)) (sigmaι α)
#align Top.sigma_cofan TopCat.sigmaCofan
def sigmaCofanIsColimit {ι : Type v} (β : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : IsColimit (sigmaCofan β) where
desc S :=
{ toFun := fun (s : of (Σ i, β i)) => S.ι.app ⟨s.1⟩ s.2
continuous_toFun := continuous_sigma fun i => (S.ι.app ⟨i⟩).continuous_toFun }
uniq := by
intro S m h
ext ⟨i, x⟩
simp only [hom_apply, ← h]
congr
fac s j := by
cases j
aesop_cat
#align Top.sigma_cofan_is_colimit TopCat.sigmaCofanIsColimit
def sigmaIsoSigma {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) : ∐ α ≅ TopCat.of (Σi, α i) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).coconePointUniqueUpToIso (sigmaCofanIsColimit.{v, u} α)
-- Specifying the universes in `sigmaCofanIsColimit` wasn't necessary when we had `TopCatMax`
#align Top.sigma_iso_sigma TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) :
Sigma.ι α i ≫ (sigmaIsoSigma α).hom = sigmaι α i := by simp [sigmaIsoSigma]
#align Top.sigma_iso_sigma_hom_ι TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι
theorem sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : α i) :
(sigmaIsoSigma α).hom ((Sigma.ι α i : _) x) = Sigma.mk i x :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι α i) x
#align Top.sigma_iso_sigma_hom_ι_apply TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply
theorem sigmaIsoSigma_inv_apply {ι : Type v} (α : ι → TopCat.{max v u}) (i : ι) (x : α i) :
(sigmaIsoSigma α).inv ⟨i, x⟩ = (Sigma.ι α i : _) x := by
rw [← sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply, ← comp_app, ← comp_app, Iso.hom_inv_id,
Category.comp_id]
#align Top.sigma_iso_sigma_inv_apply TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma_inv_apply
-- Porting note: cannot use .topologicalSpace in place .str
theorem induced_of_isLimit {F : J ⥤ TopCat.{max v u}} (C : Cone F) (hC : IsLimit C) :
C.pt.str = ⨅ j, (F.obj j).str.induced (C.π.app j) := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (hC.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limitConeInfiIsLimit F))
refine homeo.inducing.induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (⨅ j : J, _) = _
simp [induced_iInf, induced_compose]
rfl
#align Top.induced_of_is_limit TopCat.induced_of_isLimit
theorem limit_topology (F : J ⥤ TopCat.{max v u}) :
(limit F).str = ⨅ j, (F.obj j).str.induced (limit.π F j) :=
induced_of_isLimit _ (limit.isLimit F)
#align Top.limit_topology TopCat.limit_topology
section Prod
-- Porting note: why is autoParam not firing?
abbrev prodFst {X Y : TopCat.{u}} : TopCat.of (X × Y) ⟶ X :=
⟨Prod.fst, by continuity⟩
#align Top.prod_fst TopCat.prodFst
abbrev prodSnd {X Y : TopCat.{u}} : TopCat.of (X × Y) ⟶ Y :=
⟨Prod.snd, by continuity⟩
#align Top.prod_snd TopCat.prodSnd
def prodBinaryFan (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : BinaryFan X Y :=
BinaryFan.mk prodFst prodSnd
#align Top.prod_binary_fan TopCat.prodBinaryFan
def prodBinaryFanIsLimit (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : IsLimit (prodBinaryFan X Y) where
lift := fun S : BinaryFan X Y => {
toFun := fun s => (S.fst s, S.snd s)
-- Porting note: continuity failed again here. Lean cannot infer
-- ContinuousMapClass (X ⟶ Y) X Y for X Y : TopCat which may be one of the problems
continuous_toFun := Continuous.prod_mk
(BinaryFan.fst S).continuous_toFun (BinaryFan.snd S).continuous_toFun }
fac := by
rintro S (_ | _) <;> {dsimp; ext; rfl}
uniq := by
intro S m h
-- Porting note: used to be `ext x`
refine ContinuousMap.ext (fun (x : ↥(S.pt)) => Prod.ext ?_ ?_)
· specialize h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
apply_fun fun e => e x at h
exact h
· specialize h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
apply_fun fun e => e x at h
exact h
#align Top.prod_binary_fan_is_limit TopCat.prodBinaryFanIsLimit
def prodIsoProd (X Y : TopCat.{u}) : X ⨯ Y ≅ TopCat.of (X × Y) :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (prodBinaryFanIsLimit X Y)
#align Top.prod_iso_prod TopCat.prodIsoProd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prodIsoProd_hom_fst (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).hom ≫ prodFst = Limits.prod.fst := by
simp [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, prodIsoProd]
rfl
#align Top.prod_iso_prod_hom_fst TopCat.prodIsoProd_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prodIsoProd_hom_snd (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).hom ≫ prodSnd = Limits.prod.snd := by
simp [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, prodIsoProd]
rfl
#align Top.prod_iso_prod_hom_snd TopCat.prodIsoProd_hom_snd
-- Porting note: need to force Lean to coerce X × Y to a type
theorem prodIsoProd_hom_apply {X Y : TopCat.{u}} (x : ↑ (X ⨯ Y)) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).hom x = ((Limits.prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) x,
(Limits.prod.snd : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) x) := by
-- Porting note: ext didn't pick this up
apply Prod.ext
· exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (prodIsoProd_hom_fst X Y) x
· exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (prodIsoProd_hom_snd X Y) x
#align Top.prod_iso_prod_hom_apply TopCat.prodIsoProd_hom_apply
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise]
theorem prodIsoProd_inv_fst (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).inv ≫ Limits.prod.fst = prodFst := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align Top.prod_iso_prod_inv_fst TopCat.prodIsoProd_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise]
theorem prodIsoProd_inv_snd (X Y : TopCat.{u}) :
(prodIsoProd X Y).inv ≫ Limits.prod.snd = prodSnd := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align Top.prod_iso_prod_inv_snd TopCat.prodIsoProd_inv_snd
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Products.lean | 238 | 246 | theorem prod_topology {X Y : TopCat.{u}} :
(X ⨯ Y).str =
induced (Limits.prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) X.str ⊓
induced (Limits.prod.snd : X ⨯ Y ⟶ _) Y.str := by |
let homeo := homeoOfIso (prodIsoProd X Y)
refine homeo.inducing.induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (_ ⊓ _) = _
simp [induced_compose]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Init.Control.Combinators
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Util.CompileInductive
import Aesop
#align_import data.option.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f340f229b1f461aa1c8ee11e0a172d0a3b301a4a"
universe u
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
theorem coe_def : (fun a ↦ ↑a : α → Option α) = some :=
rfl
#align option.coe_def Option.coe_def
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {y : β} {o : Option α} : y ∈ o.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, f x = y := by simp
#align option.mem_map Option.mem_map
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Option.mem_def`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {o : Option α} :
f a ∈ o.map f ↔ a ∈ o := by
aesop
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
#align option.forall_mem_map Option.forall_mem_map
theorem exists_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
#align option.exists_mem_map Option.exists_mem_map
theorem coe_get {o : Option α} (h : o.isSome) : ((Option.get _ h : α) : Option α) = o :=
Option.some_get h
#align option.coe_get Option.coe_get
theorem eq_of_mem_of_mem {a : α} {o1 o2 : Option α} (h1 : a ∈ o1) (h2 : a ∈ o2) : o1 = o2 :=
h1.trans h2.symm
#align option.eq_of_mem_of_mem Option.eq_of_mem_of_mem
theorem Mem.leftUnique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Option α → Prop) :=
fun _ _ _=> mem_unique
#align option.mem.left_unique Option.Mem.leftUnique
theorem some_injective (α : Type*) : Function.Injective (@some α) := fun _ _ ↦ some_inj.mp
#align option.some_injective Option.some_injective
theorem map_injective {f : α → β} (Hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective (Option.map f)
| none, none, _ => rfl
| some a₁, some a₂, H => by rw [Hf (Option.some.inj H)]
#align option.map_injective Option.map_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_some (f : α → β) : Option.map f ∘ some = some ∘ f :=
rfl
#align option.map_comp_some Option.map_comp_some
@[simp]
theorem none_bind' (f : α → Option β) : none.bind f = none :=
rfl
#align option.none_bind' Option.none_bind'
@[simp]
theorem some_bind' (a : α) (f : α → Option β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
rfl
#align option.some_bind' Option.some_bind'
theorem bind_eq_some' {x : Option α} {f : α → Option β} {b : β} :
x.bind f = some b ↔ ∃ a, x = some a ∧ f a = some b := by
cases x <;> simp
#align option.bind_eq_some' Option.bind_eq_some'
#align option.bind_eq_none' Option.bind_eq_none'
theorem bind_congr {f g : α → Option β} {x : Option α}
(h : ∀ a ∈ x, f a = g a) : x.bind f = x.bind g := by
cases x <;> simp only [some_bind, none_bind, mem_def, h]
@[congr]
theorem bind_congr' {f g : α → Option β} {x y : Option α} (hx : x = y)
(hf : ∀ a ∈ y, f a = g a) : x.bind f = y.bind g :=
hx.symm ▸ bind_congr hf
theorem joinM_eq_join : joinM = @join α :=
funext fun _ ↦ rfl
#align option.join_eq_join Option.joinM_eq_join
theorem bind_eq_bind' {α β : Type u} {f : α → Option β} {x : Option α} : x >>= f = x.bind f :=
rfl
#align option.bind_eq_bind Option.bind_eq_bind'
theorem map_coe {α β} {a : α} {f : α → β} : f <$> (a : Option α) = ↑(f a) :=
rfl
#align option.map_coe Option.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_coe' {a : α} {f : α → β} : Option.map f (a : Option α) = ↑(f a) :=
rfl
#align option.map_coe' Option.map_coe'
theorem map_injective' : Function.Injective (@Option.map α β) := fun f g h ↦
funext fun x ↦ some_injective _ <| by simp only [← map_some', h]
#align option.map_injective' Option.map_injective'
@[simp]
theorem map_inj {f g : α → β} : Option.map f = Option.map g ↔ f = g :=
map_injective'.eq_iff
#align option.map_inj Option.map_inj
attribute [simp] map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_id {f : α → α} : Option.map f = id ↔ f = id :=
map_injective'.eq_iff' map_id
#align option.map_eq_id Option.map_eq_id
theorem map_comm {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} {g₁ : β → δ} {g₂ : γ → δ} (h : g₁ ∘ f₁ = g₂ ∘ f₂)
(a : α) :
(Option.map f₁ a).map g₁ = (Option.map f₂ a).map g₂ := by rw [map_map, h, ← map_map]
#align option.map_comm Option.map_comm
@[simp]
theorem seq_some {α β} {a : α} {f : α → β} : some f <*> some a = some (f a) :=
rfl
#align option.seq_some Option.seq_some
@[simp]
theorem some_orElse' (a : α) (x : Option α) : (some a).orElse (fun _ ↦ x) = some a :=
rfl
#align option.some_orelse' Option.some_orElse'
#align option.some_orelse Option.some_orElse
@[simp]
theorem none_orElse' (x : Option α) : none.orElse (fun _ ↦ x) = x := by cases x <;> rfl
#align option.none_orelse' Option.none_orElse'
#align option.none_orelse Option.none_orElse
@[simp]
theorem orElse_none' (x : Option α) : x.orElse (fun _ ↦ none) = x := by cases x <;> rfl
#align option.orelse_none' Option.orElse_none'
#align option.orelse_none Option.orElse_none
#align option.is_some_none Option.isSome_none
#align option.is_some_some Option.isSome_some
#align option.is_some_iff_exists Option.isSome_iff_exists
#align option.is_none_none Option.isNone_none
#align option.is_none_some Option.isNone_some
#align option.not_is_some Option.not_isSome
#align option.not_is_some_iff_eq_none Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none
#align option.ne_none_iff_is_some Option.ne_none_iff_isSome
| Mathlib/Data/Option/Basic.lean | 322 | 323 | theorem exists_ne_none {p : Option α → Prop} : (∃ x ≠ none, p x) ↔ (∃ x : α, p x) := by |
simp only [← exists_prop, bex_ne_none]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.list.nat_antidiagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7b78d1776212a91ecc94cf601f83bdcc46b04213"
open List Function Nat
namespace List
namespace Nat
def antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : List (ℕ × ℕ) :=
(range (n + 1)).map fun i ↦ (i, n - i)
#align list.nat.antidiagonal List.Nat.antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem mem_antidiagonal {n : ℕ} {x : ℕ × ℕ} : x ∈ antidiagonal n ↔ x.1 + x.2 = n := by
rw [antidiagonal, mem_map]; constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
rw [mem_range, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hi
exact Nat.add_sub_cancel' hi
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨x.fst, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_range]
omega
· exact Prod.ext rfl (by simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left])
#align list.nat.mem_antidiagonal List.Nat.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem length_antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : (antidiagonal n).length = n + 1 := by
rw [antidiagonal, length_map, length_range]
#align list.nat.length_antidiagonal List.Nat.length_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_zero : antidiagonal 0 = [(0, 0)] :=
rfl
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_zero List.Nat.antidiagonal_zero
theorem nodup_antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : Nodup (antidiagonal n) :=
(nodup_range _).map ((@LeftInverse.injective ℕ (ℕ × ℕ) Prod.fst fun i ↦ (i, n - i)) fun _ ↦ rfl)
#align list.nat.nodup_antidiagonal List.Nat.nodup_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem antidiagonal_succ {n : ℕ} :
antidiagonal (n + 1) = (0, n + 1) :: (antidiagonal n).map (Prod.map Nat.succ id) := by
simp only [antidiagonal, range_succ_eq_map, map_cons, true_and_iff, Nat.add_succ_sub_one,
Nat.add_zero, id, eq_self_iff_true, Nat.sub_zero, map_map, Prod.map_mk]
apply congr rfl (congr rfl _)
ext; simp
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_succ List.Nat.antidiagonal_succ
theorem antidiagonal_succ' {n : ℕ} :
antidiagonal (n + 1) = (antidiagonal n).map (Prod.map id Nat.succ) ++ [(n + 1, 0)] := by
simp only [antidiagonal, range_succ, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, map_append, append_assoc,
Nat.sub_self, singleton_append, map_map, map]
congr 1
apply map_congr
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [le_of_lt, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.sub_add_comm]
#align list.nat.antidiagonal_succ' List.Nat.antidiagonal_succ'
| Mathlib/Data/List/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 85 | 92 | theorem antidiagonal_succ_succ' {n : ℕ} :
antidiagonal (n + 2) =
(0, n + 2) :: (antidiagonal n).map (Prod.map Nat.succ Nat.succ) ++ [(n + 2, 0)] := by |
rw [antidiagonal_succ']
simp only [antidiagonal_succ, map_cons, Prod.map_apply, id_eq, map_map, cons_append, cons.injEq,
append_cancel_right_eq, true_and]
ext
simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.GlueData
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Opens
import Mathlib.Tactic.Generalize
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
#align_import topology.gluing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace TopCat
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure GlueData extends GlueData TopCat where
f_open : ∀ i j, OpenEmbedding (f i j)
f_mono := fun i j => (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mpr (f_open i j).toEmbedding.inj
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data TopCat.GlueData
namespace GlueData
variable (D : GlueData.{u})
local notation "𝖣" => D.toGlueData
theorem π_surjective : Function.Surjective 𝖣.π :=
(TopCat.epi_iff_surjective 𝖣.π).mp inferInstance
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.π_surjective TopCat.GlueData.π_surjective
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set 𝖣.glued) : IsOpen U ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (𝖣.ι i ⁻¹' U) := by
delta CategoryTheory.GlueData.ι
simp_rw [← Multicoequalizer.ι_sigmaπ 𝖣.diagram]
rw [← (homeoOfIso (Multicoequalizer.isoCoequalizer 𝖣.diagram).symm).isOpen_preimage]
rw [coequalizer_isOpen_iff]
dsimp only [GlueData.diagram_l, GlueData.diagram_left, GlueData.diagram_r, GlueData.diagram_right,
parallelPair_obj_one]
rw [colimit_isOpen_iff.{_,u}] -- Porting note: changed `.{u}` to `.{_,u}`. fun fact: the proof
-- breaks down if this `rw` is merged with the `rw` above.
constructor
· intro h j; exact h ⟨j⟩
· intro h j; cases j; apply h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.is_open_iff TopCat.GlueData.isOpen_iff
theorem ι_jointly_surjective (x : 𝖣.glued) : ∃ (i : _) (y : D.U i), 𝖣.ι i y = x :=
𝖣.ι_jointly_surjective (forget TopCat) x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.ι_jointly_surjective TopCat.GlueData.ι_jointly_surjective
def Rel (a b : Σ i, ((D.U i : TopCat) : Type _)) : Prop :=
a = b ∨ ∃ x : D.V (a.1, b.1), D.f _ _ x = a.2 ∧ D.f _ _ (D.t _ _ x) = b.2
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.rel TopCat.GlueData.Rel
theorem rel_equiv : Equivalence D.Rel :=
⟨fun x => Or.inl (refl x), by
rintro a b (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨x, e₁, e₂⟩)
exacts [Or.inl rfl, Or.inr ⟨D.t _ _ x, e₂, by erw [← e₁, D.t_inv_apply]⟩], by
-- previous line now `erw` after #13170
rintro ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨j, b⟩ ⟨k, c⟩ (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨x, e₁, e₂⟩)
· exact id
rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨y, e₃, e₄⟩)
· exact Or.inr ⟨x, e₁, e₂⟩
let z := (pullbackIsoProdSubtype (D.f j i) (D.f j k)).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, e₂.trans e₃.symm⟩
have eq₁ : (D.t j i) ((pullback.fst : _ ⟶ D.V (j, i)) z) = x := by
dsimp only [coe_of, z]
erw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply, D.t_inv_apply]-- now `erw` after #13170
have eq₂ : (pullback.snd : _ ⟶ D.V _) z = y := pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply _ _ _
clear_value z
right
use (pullback.fst : _ ⟶ D.V (i, k)) (D.t' _ _ _ z)
dsimp only at *
substs eq₁ eq₂ e₁ e₃ e₄
have h₁ : D.t' j i k ≫ pullback.fst ≫ D.f i k = pullback.fst ≫ D.t j i ≫ D.f i j := by
rw [← 𝖣.t_fac_assoc]; congr 1; exact pullback.condition
have h₂ : D.t' j i k ≫ pullback.fst ≫ D.t i k ≫ D.f k i = pullback.snd ≫ D.t j k ≫ D.f k j := by
rw [← 𝖣.t_fac_assoc]
apply @Epi.left_cancellation _ _ _ _ (D.t' k j i)
rw [𝖣.cocycle_assoc, 𝖣.t_fac_assoc, 𝖣.t_inv_assoc]
exact pullback.condition.symm
exact ⟨ContinuousMap.congr_fun h₁ z, ContinuousMap.congr_fun h₂ z⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.rel_equiv TopCat.GlueData.rel_equiv
open CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingParallelPair
theorem eqvGen_of_π_eq
-- Porting note: was `{x y : ∐ D.U} (h : 𝖣.π x = 𝖣.π y)`
{x y : sigmaObj (β := D.toGlueData.J) (C := TopCat) D.toGlueData.U}
(h : 𝖣.π x = 𝖣.π y) :
EqvGen
-- Porting note: was (Types.CoequalizerRel 𝖣.diagram.fstSigmaMap 𝖣.diagram.sndSigmaMap)
(Types.CoequalizerRel
(X := sigmaObj (β := D.toGlueData.diagram.L) (C := TopCat) (D.toGlueData.diagram).left)
(Y := sigmaObj (β := D.toGlueData.diagram.R) (C := TopCat) (D.toGlueData.diagram).right)
𝖣.diagram.fstSigmaMap 𝖣.diagram.sndSigmaMap)
x y := by
delta GlueData.π Multicoequalizer.sigmaπ at h
-- Porting note: inlined `inferInstance` instead of leaving as a side goal.
replace h := (TopCat.mono_iff_injective (Multicoequalizer.isoCoequalizer 𝖣.diagram).inv).mp
inferInstance h
let diagram := parallelPair 𝖣.diagram.fstSigmaMap 𝖣.diagram.sndSigmaMap ⋙ forget _
have : colimit.ι diagram one x = colimit.ι diagram one y := by
dsimp only [coequalizer.π, ContinuousMap.toFun_eq_coe] at h
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← ι_preservesColimitsIso_hom, forget_map_eq_coe, types_comp_apply, h]
simp
rfl
have :
(colimit.ι diagram _ ≫ colim.map _ ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone _).hom) _ =
(colimit.ι diagram _ ≫ colim.map _ ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone _).hom) _ :=
(congr_arg
(colim.map (diagramIsoParallelPair diagram).hom ≫
(colimit.isoColimitCocone (Types.coequalizerColimit _ _)).hom)
this :
_)
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [eqToHom_refl, types_comp_apply, colimit.ι_map_assoc,
-- diagramIsoParallelPair_hom_app, colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom, types_id_apply] at this
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [colimit.ι_map_assoc, diagramIsoParallelPair_hom_app, eqToHom_refl,
colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom, types_comp_apply, types_id_apply, types_comp_apply,
types_id_apply] at this
exact Quot.eq.1 this
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.eqv_gen_of_π_eq TopCat.GlueData.eqvGen_of_π_eq
theorem ι_eq_iff_rel (i j : D.J) (x : D.U i) (y : D.U j) :
𝖣.ι i x = 𝖣.ι j y ↔ D.Rel ⟨i, x⟩ ⟨j, y⟩ := by
constructor
· delta GlueData.ι
simp_rw [← Multicoequalizer.ι_sigmaπ]
intro h
rw [←
show _ = Sigma.mk i x from ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (sigmaIsoSigma.{_, u} D.U).inv_hom_id _]
rw [←
show _ = Sigma.mk j y from ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (sigmaIsoSigma.{_, u} D.U).inv_hom_id _]
change InvImage D.Rel (sigmaIsoSigma.{_, u} D.U).hom _ _
rw [← (InvImage.equivalence _ _ D.rel_equiv).eqvGen_iff]
refine EqvGen.mono ?_ (D.eqvGen_of_π_eq h : _)
rintro _ _ ⟨x⟩
obtain ⟨⟨⟨i, j⟩, y⟩, rfl⟩ :=
(ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso (sigmaIsoSigma.{u, u} _).inv).2 x
unfold InvImage MultispanIndex.fstSigmaMap MultispanIndex.sndSigmaMap
simp only [forget_map_eq_coe]
erw [TopCat.comp_app, sigmaIsoSigma_inv_apply, ← comp_apply, ← comp_apply,
colimit.ι_desc_assoc, ← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, colimit.ι_desc_assoc]
-- previous line now `erw` after #13170
erw [sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply, sigmaIsoSigma_hom_ι_apply]
exact Or.inr ⟨y, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
· rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨z, e₁, e₂⟩)
· rfl
dsimp only at *
-- Porting note: there were `subst e₁` and `subst e₂`, instead of the `rw`
rw [← e₁, ← e₂] at *
erw [D.glue_condition_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- now `rfl` after #13170
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.ι_eq_iff_rel TopCat.GlueData.ι_eq_iff_rel
theorem ι_injective (i : D.J) : Function.Injective (𝖣.ι i) := by
intro x y h
rcases (D.ι_eq_iff_rel _ _ _ _).mp h with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨_, e₁, e₂⟩)
· rfl
· dsimp only at *
-- Porting note: there were `cases e₁` and `cases e₂`, instead of the `rw`
rw [← e₁, ← e₂]
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.ι_injective TopCat.GlueData.ι_injective
instance ι_mono (i : D.J) : Mono (𝖣.ι i) :=
(TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mpr (D.ι_injective _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Top.glue_data.ι_mono TopCat.GlueData.ι_mono
| Mathlib/Topology/Gluing.lean | 254 | 274 | theorem image_inter (i j : D.J) :
Set.range (𝖣.ι i) ∩ Set.range (𝖣.ι j) = Set.range (D.f i j ≫ 𝖣.ι _) := by |
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x₁, eq₁⟩, ⟨x₂, eq₂⟩⟩
obtain ⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨y, e₁, -⟩ := (D.ι_eq_iff_rel _ _ _ _).mp (eq₁.trans eq₂.symm)
· exact ⟨inv (D.f i i) x₁, by
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [eq₁]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
rw [TopCat.comp_app]
erw [CategoryTheory.IsIso.inv_hom_id_apply]
rw [eq₁]⟩
· -- Porting note: was
-- dsimp only at *; substs e₁ eq₁; exact ⟨y, by simp⟩
dsimp only at *
substs eq₁
exact ⟨y, by simp [e₁]⟩
· rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨D.f i j x, hx⟩, ⟨D.f j i (D.t _ _ x), ?_⟩⟩
erw [D.glue_condition_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
exact hx
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Pi
#align_import order.filter.germ from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem const_eventuallyEq' [NeBot l] {a b : β} : (∀ᶠ _ in l, a = b) ↔ a = b :=
eventually_const
#align filter.const_eventually_eq' Filter.const_eventuallyEq'
theorem const_eventuallyEq [NeBot l] {a b : β} : ((fun _ => a) =ᶠ[l] fun _ => b) ↔ a = b :=
@const_eventuallyEq' _ _ _ _ a b
#align filter.const_eventually_eq Filter.const_eventuallyEq
def germSetoid (l : Filter α) (β : Type*) : Setoid (α → β) where
r := EventuallyEq l
iseqv := ⟨EventuallyEq.refl _, EventuallyEq.symm, EventuallyEq.trans⟩
#align filter.germ_setoid Filter.germSetoid
def Germ (l : Filter α) (β : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (germSetoid l β)
#align filter.germ Filter.Germ
def productSetoid (l : Filter α) (ε : α → Type*) : Setoid ((a : _) → ε a) where
r f g := ∀ᶠ a in l, f a = g a
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl, fun h => h.mono fun _ => Eq.symm,
fun h1 h2 => h1.congr (h2.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl)⟩
#align filter.product_setoid Filter.productSetoid
-- Porting note: removed @[protected]
def Product (l : Filter α) (ε : α → Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (productSetoid l ε)
#align filter.product Filter.Product
namespace Germ
-- Porting note: added
@[coe]
def ofFun : (α → β) → (Germ l β) := @Quotient.mk' _ (germSetoid _ _)
instance : CoeTC (α → β) (Germ l β) :=
⟨ofFun⟩
@[coe] -- Porting note: removed `HasLiftT` instance
def const {l : Filter α} (b : β) : (Germ l β) := ofFun fun _ => b
instance coeTC : CoeTC β (Germ l β) :=
⟨const⟩
def IsConstant {l : Filter α} (P : Germ l β) : Prop :=
P.liftOn (fun f ↦ ∃ b : β, f =ᶠ[l] (fun _ ↦ b)) <| by
suffices ∀ f g : α → β, ∀ b : β, f =ᶠ[l] g → (f =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ b) → (g =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ b) from
fun f g h ↦ propext ⟨fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, this f g b h hb⟩, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, h.trans hb⟩⟩
exact fun f g b hfg hf ↦ (hfg.symm).trans hf
theorem isConstant_coe {l : Filter α} {b} (h : ∀ x', f x' = b) : (↑f : Germ l β).IsConstant :=
⟨b, eventually_of_forall (fun x ↦ h x)⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Germ.lean | 132 | 133 | theorem isConstant_coe_const {l : Filter α} {b : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ b : Germ l β).IsConstant := by |
use b
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Clopen
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
#align_import topology.connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d101e93197bb5f6ea89bd7ba386b7f7dff1f3903"
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
#align is_preconnected IsPreconnected
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
#align is_connected IsConnected
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
#align is_connected.nonempty IsConnected.nonempty
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
#align is_connected.is_preconnected IsConnected.isPreconnected
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
#align is_preirreducible.is_preconnected IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
#align is_irreducible.is_connected IsIrreducible.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_empty isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
#align is_connected_singleton isConnected_singleton
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_singleton isPreconnected_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.is_preconnected Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
#align is_preconnected_of_forall isPreconnected_of_forall
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
#align is_preconnected_of_forall_pair isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
#align is_preconnected_sUnion isPreconnected_sUnion
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
#align is_preconnected_Union isPreconnected_iUnion
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
#align is_preconnected.union IsPreconnected.union
theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
#align is_preconnected.union' IsPreconnected.union'
theorem IsConnected.union {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (Hs : IsConnected s)
(Ht : IsConnected t) : IsConnected (s ∪ t) := by
rcases H with ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, mem_union_left t (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx)⟩, ?_⟩
exact Hs.isPreconnected.union x (mem_of_mem_inter_left hx) (mem_of_mem_inter_right hx)
Ht.isPreconnected
#align is_connected.union IsConnected.union
theorem IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed {S : Set (Set α)} (K : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(H : ∀ s ∈ S, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ S) := by
rintro u v hu hv Huv ⟨a, ⟨s, hsS, has⟩, hau⟩ ⟨b, ⟨t, htS, hbt⟩, hbv⟩
obtain ⟨r, hrS, hsr, htr⟩ : ∃ r ∈ S, s ⊆ r ∧ t ⊆ r := K s hsS t htS
have Hnuv : (r ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty :=
H _ hrS u v hu hv ((subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS).trans Huv) ⟨a, hsr has, hau⟩ ⟨b, htr hbt, hbv⟩
have Kruv : r ∩ (u ∩ v) ⊆ ⋃₀ S ∩ (u ∩ v) := inter_subset_inter_left _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hrS)
exact Hnuv.mono Kruv
#align is_preconnected.sUnion_directed IsPreconnected.sUnion_directed
theorem IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) := by
let R := fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t
have P : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen R i j →
∃ p, p ⊆ t ∧ i ∈ p ∧ j ∈ p ∧ IsPreconnected (⋃ j ∈ p, s j) := fun i hi j hj h => by
induction h with
| refl =>
refine ⟨{i}, singleton_subset_iff.mpr hi, mem_singleton i, mem_singleton i, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_singleton]
exact H i hi
| @tail j k _ hjk ih =>
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := ih hjk.2
refine ⟨insert k p, insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨hj, hpt⟩, mem_insert_of_mem k hip,
mem_insert k p, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_insert]
refine (H k hj).union' (hjk.1.mono ?_) hp
rw [inter_comm]
exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hjp)
refine isPreconnected_of_forall_pair ?_
intro x hx y hy
obtain ⟨i : ι, hi : i ∈ t, hxi : x ∈ s i⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hx
obtain ⟨j : ι, hj : j ∈ t, hyj : y ∈ s j⟩ := mem_iUnion₂.1 hy
obtain ⟨p, hpt, hip, hjp, hp⟩ := P i hi j hj (K i hi j hj)
exact ⟨⋃ j ∈ p, s j, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hpt, mem_biUnion hip hxi,
mem_biUnion hjp hyj, hp⟩
#align is_preconnected.bUnion_of_refl_trans_gen IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen
theorem IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {t : Set ι} {s : ι → Set α}
(ht : t.Nonempty) (H : ∀ i ∈ t, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i, i ∈ t → ∀ j, j ∈ t → ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty ∧ i ∈ t) i j) :
IsConnected (⋃ n ∈ t, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_biUnion.2 <| ⟨ht.some, ht.some_mem, (H _ ht.some_mem).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i hi => (H i hi).isPreconnected) K⟩
#align is_connected.bUnion_of_refl_trans_gen IsConnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen
theorem IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) :
IsPreconnected (⋃ n, s n) := by
rw [← biUnion_univ]
exact IsPreconnected.biUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i _ => H i) fun i _ j _ => by
simpa [mem_univ] using K i j
#align is_preconnected.Union_of_refl_trans_gen IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen
theorem IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen {ι : Type*} [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(H : ∀ i, IsConnected (s i))
(K : ∀ i j, ReflTransGen (fun i j : ι => (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty) i j) : IsConnected (⋃ n, s n) :=
⟨nonempty_iUnion.2 <| Nonempty.elim ‹_› fun i : ι => ⟨i, (H _).nonempty⟩,
IsPreconnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen (fun i => (H i).isPreconnected) K⟩
#align is_connected.Union_of_refl_trans_gen IsConnected.iUnion_of_reflTransGen
protected theorem IsPreconnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsPreconnected t :=
fun u v hu hv htuv ⟨_y, hyt, hyu⟩ ⟨_z, hzt, hzv⟩ =>
let ⟨p, hpu, hps⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hyt) u hu hyu
let ⟨q, hqv, hqs⟩ := mem_closure_iff.1 (Ktcs hzt) v hv hzv
let ⟨r, hrs, hruv⟩ := H u v hu hv (Subset.trans Kst htuv) ⟨p, hps, hpu⟩ ⟨q, hqs, hqv⟩
⟨r, Kst hrs, hruv⟩
#align is_preconnected.subset_closure IsPreconnected.subset_closure
protected theorem IsConnected.subset_closure {s : Set α} {t : Set α} (H : IsConnected s)
(Kst : s ⊆ t) (Ktcs : t ⊆ closure s) : IsConnected t :=
⟨Nonempty.mono Kst H.left, IsPreconnected.subset_closure H.right Kst Ktcs⟩
#align is_connected.subset_closure IsConnected.subset_closure
protected theorem IsPreconnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s) :
IsPreconnected (closure s) :=
IsPreconnected.subset_closure H subset_closure Subset.rfl
#align is_preconnected.closure IsPreconnected.closure
protected theorem IsConnected.closure {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) : IsConnected (closure s) :=
IsConnected.subset_closure H subset_closure <| Subset.rfl
#align is_connected.closure IsConnected.closure
protected theorem IsPreconnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsPreconnected s)
(f : α → β) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) := by
-- Unfold/destruct definitions in hypotheses
rintro u v hu hv huv ⟨_, ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩, xu⟩ ⟨_, ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩, yv⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf u hu with ⟨u', hu', u'_eq⟩
rcases continuousOn_iff'.1 hf v hv with ⟨v', hv', v'_eq⟩
-- Reformulate `huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v` in terms of `u'` and `v'`
replace huv : s ⊆ u' ∪ v' := by
rw [image_subset_iff, preimage_union] at huv
replace huv := subset_inter huv Subset.rfl
rw [union_inter_distrib_right, u'_eq, v'_eq, ← union_inter_distrib_right] at huv
exact (subset_inter_iff.1 huv).1
-- Now `s ⊆ u' ∪ v'`, so we can apply `‹IsPreconnected s›`
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ : (s ∩ (u' ∩ v')).Nonempty := by
refine H u' v' hu' hv' huv ⟨x, ?_⟩ ⟨y, ?_⟩ <;> rw [inter_comm]
exacts [u'_eq ▸ ⟨xu, xs⟩, v'_eq ▸ ⟨yv, ys⟩]
rw [← inter_self s, inter_assoc, inter_left_comm s u', ← inter_assoc, inter_comm s, inter_comm s,
← u'_eq, ← v'_eq] at hz
exact ⟨f z, ⟨z, hz.1.2, rfl⟩, hz.1.1, hz.2.1⟩
#align is_preconnected.image IsPreconnected.image
protected theorem IsConnected.image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} (H : IsConnected s) (f : α → β)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsConnected (f '' s) :=
⟨image_nonempty.mpr H.nonempty, H.isPreconnected.image f hf⟩
#align is_connected.image IsConnected.image
theorem isPreconnected_closed_iff {s : Set α} :
IsPreconnected s ↔ ∀ t t', IsClosed t → IsClosed t' →
s ⊆ t ∪ t' → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → (s ∩ t').Nonempty → (s ∩ (t ∩ t')).Nonempty :=
⟨by
rintro h t t' ht ht' htt' ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ ⟨y, ys, yt'⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xt' : x ∉ t' := (h' xs).resolve_left (absurd xt)
have yt : y ∉ t := (h' ys).resolve_right (absurd yt')
have := h _ _ ht.isOpen_compl ht'.isOpen_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yt⟩ ⟨x, xs, xt'⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty htt'.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq,
by
rintro h u v hu hv huv ⟨x, xs, xu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, ← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_inter]
intro h'
have xv : x ∉ v := (h' xs).elim (absurd xu) id
have yu : y ∉ u := (h' ys).elim id (absurd yv)
have := h _ _ hu.isClosed_compl hv.isClosed_compl h' ⟨y, ys, yu⟩ ⟨x, xs, xv⟩
rw [← compl_union] at this
exact this.ne_empty huv.disjoint_compl_right.inter_eq⟩
#align is_preconnected_closed_iff isPreconnected_closed_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 361 | 370 | theorem Inducing.isPreconnected_image [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
(hf : Inducing f) : IsPreconnected (f '' s) ↔ IsPreconnected s := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.image _ hf.continuous.continuousOn⟩
rintro u v hu' hv' huv ⟨x, hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨y, hys, hyv⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hu' with ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
rcases hf.isOpen_iff.1 hv' with ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
replace huv : f '' s ⊆ u ∪ v := by rwa [image_subset_iff]
rcases h u v hu hv huv ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hxs, hxu⟩ ⟨f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hys, hyv⟩ with
⟨_, ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩, hzuv⟩
exact ⟨z, hzs, hzuv⟩
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le'
theorem lintegral_sub_le (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub_le' f g hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h : ∃ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ g x) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, Ne, Classical.not_not]
exact ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le h_le hfi hg h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) {s : Set α} (hμs : μ s ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt hg hfi h_le <|
((frequently_ae_mem_iff.2 hμs).and_eventually h).mono fun _x hx => (hx.2 hx.1).ne
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on
theorem lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
rw [Ne, ← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
refine lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on hg hfi (ae_le_of_ae_lt h) hμ ?_
simpa using h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono
theorem set_lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ 0) (hg : Measurable g) (hfi : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono (by simp [hs]) hg.aemeasurable hfi ((ae_restrict_iff' hsm).mpr h)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_strict_mono
theorem lintegral_iInf_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ ≤ᵐ[μ] f n) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
have fn_le_f0 : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
have fn_le_f0' : ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ := iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
(ENNReal.sub_right_inj h_fin fn_le_f0 fn_le_f0').1 <|
show ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ from
calc
∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_sub (measurable_iInf h_meas)
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun a => iInf_le _ _)).symm
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ := congr rfl (funext fun a => ENNReal.sub_iInf)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup_ae (fun n => (h_meas 0).sub (h_meas n)) fun n =>
(h_mono n).mono fun a ha => tsub_le_tsub le_rfl ha)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
(have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ a ≤ f n a := ae_all_iff.2 h_mono
have h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f 0 a := fun n =>
h_mono.mono fun a h => by
induction' n with n ih
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans (h n) ih
congr_arg iSup <|
funext fun n =>
lintegral_sub (h_meas _) (ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono_ae <| h_mono n)
(h_mono n))
_ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := ENNReal.sub_iInf.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_ae
theorem lintegral_iInf {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_anti : Antitone f)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iInf_ae h_meas (fun n => ae_of_all _ <| h_anti n.le_succ) h_fin
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf
theorem lintegral_iInf' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_anti : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a)) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iInf_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Antitone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_anti
have h_ae_seq_mono : Antitone (aeSeq h_meas p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet h_meas p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet h_meas hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iInf h_meas hp).symm]
simp_rw [iInf_apply]
rw [lintegral_iInf (aeSeq.measurable h_meas p) h_ae_seq_mono]
· congr
exact funext fun n ↦ lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp n)
· rwa [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp 0)]
theorem lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [Countable β]
{f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b))
(hf_int : ∀ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_directed : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp only [iInf_of_empty, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.top_mul (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.mpr hμ)]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨅ b, f b a = ⨅ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
refine fun a =>
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun n => iInf_le _ _)
(le_iInf fun b => iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) ?_)
exact h_directed.sequence_le b a
-- Porting note: used `∘` below to deal with its reduced reducibility
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by simp only [this, Function.comp_apply]
_ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_iInf ?_ h_directed.sequence_anti]
· exact hf_int _
· exact fun n => hf _
_ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun b => ?_) (le_iInf fun n => ?_)
· exact iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.sequence_le b)
· exact iInf_le (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
#align lintegral_infi_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable
theorem lintegral_liminf_le' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
calc
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat]
_ = ⨆ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup' (fun n => aemeasurable_biInf _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ h_meas i))
(ae_of_all μ fun a n m hnm => iInf_le_iInf_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi))
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := iSup_mono fun n => le_iInf₂_lintegral _
_ = atTop.liminf fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le'
theorem lintegral_liminf_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
lintegral_liminf_le' fun n => (h_meas n).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le
theorem limsup_lintegral_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_bound : ∀ n, f n ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ :=
calc
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
_ ≤ ⨅ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := iInf_mono fun n => iSup₂_lintegral_le _
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
refine (lintegral_iInf ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro n
exact measurable_biSup _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ hf_meas i)
· intro n m hnm a
exact iSup_le_iSup_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi
· refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin (lintegral_mono_ae ?_)
refine (ae_all_iff.2 h_bound).mono fun n hn => ?_
exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => hn i
_ = ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ := by simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat]
#align measure_theory.limsup_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.limsup_lintegral_le
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) :=
tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
(calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n : ℕ => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.liminf_eq.symm
_ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop := lintegral_liminf_le hF_meas
)
(calc
limsup (fun n : ℕ => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
limsup_lintegral_le hF_meas h_bound h_fin
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.limsup_eq
)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) := by
have : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a ∂μ := fun n =>
lintegral_congr_ae (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk
simp_rw [this]
apply
tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence bound (fun n => (hF_meas n).measurable_mk) _ h_fin
· have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := fun n => (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk.symm
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := ae_all_iff.mpr this
filter_upwards [this, h_lim] with a H H'
simp_rw [H]
exact H'
· intro n
filter_upwards [h_bound n, (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk] with a H H'
rwa [H'] at H
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence'
theorem tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {F : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (bound : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, F n a ≤ bound a)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl := by
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
exact xl
have h := inter_mem hF_meas h_bound
replace h := hxl _ h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact bound
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).1
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).2
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· assumption
· refine h_lim.mono fun a h_lim => ?_
apply @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) fun n => F n a
· assumption
rw [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
assumption
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_anti : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h0 : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
have : Antitone fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij ↦
lintegral_mono_ae (h_anti.mono fun x hx ↦ hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf this
rw [← lintegral_iInf' hf h_anti h0]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_anti, h_tendsto] with _ hx_anti hx_tendsto
using tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iInf hx_anti)
section
open Encodable
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,237 | 1,255 | theorem lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b)) (h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by |
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp [iSup_of_empty]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨆ b, f b a = ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
intro a
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun b => ?_) (iSup_le fun n => le_iSup (fun n => f n a) _)
exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (h_directed.le_sequence b a)
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ := by simp only [this]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => hf _) h_directed.sequence_mono)
_ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun b => ?_)
· exact le_iSup (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
· exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.le_sequence b)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 615 | 616 | theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by |
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
section CartesianProduct
section Pi
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {F' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (F' i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (F' i)] {φ : ∀ i, E → F' i} {φ' : ∀ i, E →L[𝕜] F' i} {Φ : E → ∀ i, F' i}
{Φ' : E →L[𝕜] ∀ i, F' i}
@[simp]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_pi' :
HasStrictFDerivAt Φ Φ' x ↔ ∀ i, HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') x := by
simp only [HasStrictFDerivAt, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_pi]
exact isLittleO_pi
#align has_strict_fderiv_at_pi' hasStrictFDerivAt_pi'
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_pi'' (hφ : ∀ i, HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt Φ Φ' x := hasStrictFDerivAt_pi'.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, F' i) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) (proj i) f := by
let id' := ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (∀ i, F' i)
have h := ((hasStrictFDerivAt_pi'
(Φ := fun (f : ∀ i, F' i) (i' : ι) => f i') (Φ':=id') (x:=f))).1
have h' : comp (proj i) id' = proj i := by rfl
rw [← h']; apply h; apply hasStrictFDerivAt_id
@[simp 1100] -- Porting note: increased priority to make lint happy
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_pi :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x i => φ i x) (ContinuousLinearMap.pi φ') x ↔
∀ i, HasStrictFDerivAt (φ i) (φ' i) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_pi'
#align has_strict_fderiv_at_pi hasStrictFDerivAt_pi
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_pi' :
HasFDerivAtFilter Φ Φ' x L ↔
∀ i, HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') x L := by
simp only [hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_pi]
exact isLittleO_pi
#align has_fderiv_at_filter_pi' hasFDerivAtFilter_pi'
theorem hasFDerivAtFilter_pi :
HasFDerivAtFilter (fun x i => φ i x) (ContinuousLinearMap.pi φ') x L ↔
∀ i, HasFDerivAtFilter (φ i) (φ' i) x L :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_pi'
#align has_fderiv_at_filter_pi hasFDerivAtFilter_pi
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivAt_pi' :
HasFDerivAt Φ Φ' x ↔ ∀ i, HasFDerivAt (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_pi'
#align has_fderiv_at_pi' hasFDerivAt_pi'
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_pi'' (hφ : ∀ i, HasFDerivAt (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') x) :
HasFDerivAt Φ Φ' x := hasFDerivAt_pi'.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, F' i) :
HasFDerivAt (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) (proj i) f := by
apply HasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
apply hasStrictFDerivAt_apply
theorem hasFDerivAt_pi :
HasFDerivAt (fun x i => φ i x) (ContinuousLinearMap.pi φ') x ↔
∀ i, HasFDerivAt (φ i) (φ' i) x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_pi
#align has_fderiv_at_pi hasFDerivAt_pi
@[simp]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_pi' :
HasFDerivWithinAt Φ Φ' s x ↔ ∀ i, HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_pi'
#align has_fderiv_within_at_pi' hasFDerivWithinAt_pi'
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_pi''
(hφ : ∀ i, HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x => Φ x i) ((proj i).comp Φ') s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt Φ Φ' s x := hasFDerivWithinAt_pi'.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, F' i) (s' : Set (∀ i, F' i)) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) (proj i) s' f := by
let id' := ContinuousLinearMap.id 𝕜 (∀ i, F' i)
have h := ((hasFDerivWithinAt_pi'
(Φ := fun (f : ∀ i, F' i) (i' : ι) => f i') (Φ':=id') (x:=f) (s:=s'))).1
have h' : comp (proj i) id' = proj i := by rfl
rw [← h']; apply h; apply hasFDerivWithinAt_id
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_pi :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x i => φ i x) (ContinuousLinearMap.pi φ') s x ↔
∀ i, HasFDerivWithinAt (φ i) (φ' i) s x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_pi
#align has_fderiv_within_at_pi hasFDerivWithinAt_pi
@[simp]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_pi :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 Φ s x ↔ ∀ i, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => Φ x i) s x :=
⟨fun h i => (hasFDerivWithinAt_pi'.1 h.hasFDerivWithinAt i).differentiableWithinAt, fun h =>
(hasFDerivWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => (h i).hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt⟩
#align differentiable_within_at_pi differentiableWithinAt_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_pi'' (hφ : ∀ i, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => Φ x i) s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 Φ s x := differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, F' i) (s' : Set (∀ i, F' i)) :
DifferentiableWithinAt (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) s' f := by
apply HasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
fun_prop
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_pi : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 Φ x ↔ ∀ i, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => Φ x i) x :=
⟨fun h i => (hasFDerivAt_pi'.1 h.hasFDerivAt i).differentiableAt, fun h =>
(hasFDerivAt_pi.2 fun i => (h i).hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt⟩
#align differentiable_at_pi differentiableAt_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_pi'' (hφ : ∀ i, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => Φ x i) x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 Φ x := differentiableAt_pi.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_apply (i : ι) (f : ∀ i, F' i) :
DifferentiableAt (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) f := by
have h := ((differentiableAt_pi (𝕜:=𝕜)
(Φ := fun (f : ∀ i, F' i) (i' : ι) => f i') (x:=f))).1
apply h; apply differentiableAt_id
theorem differentiableOn_pi : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 Φ s ↔ ∀ i, DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => Φ x i) s :=
⟨fun h i x hx => differentiableWithinAt_pi.1 (h x hx) i, fun h x hx =>
differentiableWithinAt_pi.2 fun i => h i x hx⟩
#align differentiable_on_pi differentiableOn_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableOn_pi'' (hφ : ∀ i, DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => Φ x i) s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 Φ s := differentiableOn_pi.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableOn_apply (i : ι) (s' : Set (∀ i, F' i)) :
DifferentiableOn (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) s' := by
have h := ((differentiableOn_pi (𝕜:=𝕜)
(Φ := fun (f : ∀ i, F' i) (i' : ι) => f i') (s:=s'))).1
apply h; apply differentiableOn_id
theorem differentiable_pi : Differentiable 𝕜 Φ ↔ ∀ i, Differentiable 𝕜 fun x => Φ x i :=
⟨fun h i x => differentiableAt_pi.1 (h x) i, fun h x => differentiableAt_pi.2 fun i => h i x⟩
#align differentiable_pi differentiable_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiable_pi'' (hφ : ∀ i, Differentiable 𝕜 fun x => Φ x i) :
Differentiable 𝕜 Φ := differentiable_pi.2 hφ
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Prod.lean | 547 | 548 | theorem differentiable_apply (i : ι) :
Differentiable (𝕜:=𝕜) (fun f : ∀ i, F' i => f i) := by | intro x; apply differentiableAt_apply
|
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
open Nat
namespace List
section countP
variable (p q : α → Bool)
@[simp] theorem countP_nil : countP p [] = 0 := rfl
protected theorem countP_go_eq_add (l) : countP.go p l n = n + countP.go p l 0 := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => rfl
| cons head tail ih =>
unfold countP.go
rw [ih (n := n + 1), ih (n := n), ih (n := 1)]
if h : p head then simp [h, Nat.add_assoc] else simp [h]
@[simp] theorem countP_cons_of_pos (l) (pa : p a) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l + 1 := by
have : countP.go p (a :: l) 0 = countP.go p l 1 := show cond .. = _ by rw [pa]; rfl
unfold countP
rw [this, Nat.add_comm, List.countP_go_eq_add]
@[simp] theorem countP_cons_of_neg (l) (pa : ¬p a) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l := by
simp [countP, countP.go, pa]
theorem countP_cons (a : α) (l) : countP p (a :: l) = countP p l + if p a then 1 else 0 := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
theorem length_eq_countP_add_countP (l) : length l = countP p l + countP (fun a => ¬p a) l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x h ih =>
if h : p x then
rw [countP_cons_of_pos _ _ h, countP_cons_of_neg _ _ _, length, ih]
· rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm _ 1, Nat.add_assoc]
· simp only [h, not_true_eq_false, decide_False, not_false_eq_true]
else
rw [countP_cons_of_pos (fun a => ¬p a) _ _, countP_cons_of_neg _ _ h, length, ih]
· rfl
· simp only [h, not_false_eq_true, decide_True]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Count.lean | 60 | 66 | theorem countP_eq_length_filter (l) : countP p l = length (filter p l) := by |
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x l ih =>
if h : p x
then rw [countP_cons_of_pos p l h, ih, filter_cons_of_pos l h, length]
else rw [countP_cons_of_neg p l h, ih, filter_cons_of_neg l h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
#align_import data.nat.multiplicity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ceb887ddf3344dab425292e497fa2af91498437c"
open Finset Nat multiplicity
open Nat
namespace Nat
theorem multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd {m n b : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 1) (hn : 0 < n) (hb : log m n < b) :
multiplicity m n = ↑((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => m ^ i ∣ n).card :=
calc
multiplicity m n = ↑(Ico 1 <| (multiplicity m n).get (finite_nat_iff.2 ⟨hm, hn⟩) + 1).card := by
simp
_ = ↑((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => m ^ i ∣ n).card :=
congr_arg _ <|
congr_arg card <|
Finset.ext fun i => by
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← @PartENat.coe_le_coe i,
PartENat.natCast_get, ← pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, and_right_comm]
refine (and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hb).symm
cases' m with m
· rw [zero_pow, zero_dvd_iff] at h
exacts [(hn.ne' h.2).elim, one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 h.1]
exact le_log_of_pow_le (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.2 ⟨m.succ_ne_zero, hm⟩)
(le_of_dvd hn h.2)
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd Nat.multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd
namespace Prime
theorem multiplicity_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : multiplicity p 1 = 0 :=
multiplicity.one_right hp.prime.not_unit
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_one Nat.Prime.multiplicity_one
theorem multiplicity_mul {p m n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
multiplicity p (m * n) = multiplicity p m + multiplicity p n :=
multiplicity.mul hp.prime
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_mul Nat.Prime.multiplicity_mul
theorem multiplicity_pow {p m n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
multiplicity p (m ^ n) = n • multiplicity p m :=
multiplicity.pow hp.prime
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_pow Nat.Prime.multiplicity_pow
theorem multiplicity_self {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : multiplicity p p = 1 :=
multiplicity.multiplicity_self hp.prime.not_unit hp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_self Nat.Prime.multiplicity_self
theorem multiplicity_pow_self {p n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : multiplicity p (p ^ n) = n :=
multiplicity.multiplicity_pow_self hp.ne_zero hp.prime.not_unit n
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_pow_self Nat.Prime.multiplicity_pow_self
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Multiplicity.lean | 108 | 123 | theorem multiplicity_factorial {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
∀ {n b : ℕ}, log p n < b → multiplicity p n ! = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, n / p ^ i : ℕ)
| 0, b, _ => by simp [Ico, hp.multiplicity_one]
| n + 1, b, hb =>
calc
multiplicity p (n + 1)! = multiplicity p n ! + multiplicity p (n + 1) := by |
rw [factorial_succ, hp.multiplicity_mul, add_comm]
_ = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, n / p ^ i : ℕ) +
((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n + 1).card := by
rw [multiplicity_factorial hp ((log_mono_right <| le_succ _).trans_lt hb), ←
multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd hp.ne_one (succ_pos _) hb]
_ = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, (n / p ^ i + if p ^ i ∣ n + 1 then 1 else 0) : ℕ) := by
rw [sum_add_distrib, sum_boole]
simp
_ = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, (n + 1) / p ^ i : ℕ) :=
congr_arg _ <| Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => (succ_div _ _).symm
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Faces
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Basic
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.projections from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Preadditive
CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject Opposite CategoryTheory.Idempotents
open Simplicial DoldKan
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {X : SimplicialObject C}
noncomputable def P : ℕ → (K[X] ⟶ K[X])
| 0 => 𝟙 _
| q + 1 => P q ≫ (𝟙 _ + Hσ q)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.P
-- Porting note: `P_zero` and `P_succ` have been added to ease the port, because
-- `unfold P` would sometimes unfold to a `match` rather than the induction formula
lemma P_zero : (P 0 : K[X] ⟶ K[X]) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
lemma P_succ (q : ℕ) : (P (q+1) : K[X] ⟶ K[X]) = P q ≫ (𝟙 _ + Hσ q) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem P_f_0_eq (q : ℕ) : ((P q).f 0 : X _[0] ⟶ X _[0]) = 𝟙 _ := by
induction' q with q hq
· rfl
· simp only [P_succ, HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
HomologicalComplex.id_f, id_comp, hq, Hσ_eq_zero, add_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_f_0_eq AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.P_f_0_eq
def Q (q : ℕ) : K[X] ⟶ K[X] :=
𝟙 _ - P q
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Q AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Q
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/Projections.lean | 75 | 77 | theorem P_add_Q (q : ℕ) : P q + Q q = 𝟙 K[X] := by |
rw [Q]
abel
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Curry
#align_import analysis.calculus.uniform_limits_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
open Filter
open scoped uniformity Filter Topology
section LimitsOfDerivatives
variable {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] {f : ι → E → G}
{g : E → G} {f' : ι → E → E →L[𝕜] G} {g' : E → E →L[𝕜] G} {x : E}
theorem uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_of_fderiv (hf' : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter f' l (𝓝 x))
(hf : ∀ᶠ n : ι × E in l ×ˢ 𝓝 x, HasFDerivAt (f n.1) (f' n.1 n.2) n.2)
(hfg : Cauchy (map (fun n => f n x) l)) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter f l (𝓝 x) := by
letI : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
rw [SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_zero] at hf' ⊢
suffices
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (n : ι × ι) (z : E) => f n.1 z - f n.2 z - (f n.1 x - f n.2 x)) 0
(l ×ˢ l) (𝓝 x) ∧
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (n : ι × ι) (_ : E) => f n.1 x - f n.2 x) 0 (l ×ˢ l) (𝓝 x) by
have := this.1.add this.2
rw [add_zero] at this
exact this.congr (by simp)
constructor
· -- This inequality follows from the mean value theorem. To apply it, we will need to shrink our
-- neighborhood to small enough ball
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff] at hf' ⊢
intro ε hε
have := (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually (hf.prod_mk hf)).diag_of_prod_right
obtain ⟨a, b, c, d, e⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.1 ((hf' ε hε).and this)
obtain ⟨R, hR, hR'⟩ := Metric.nhds_basis_ball.eventually_iff.mp d
let r := min 1 R
have hr : 0 < r := by simp [r, hR]
have hr' : ∀ ⦃y : E⦄, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → c y := fun y hy =>
hR' (lt_of_lt_of_le (Metric.mem_ball.mp hy) (min_le_right _ _))
have hxy : ∀ y : E, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → ‖y - x‖ < 1 := by
intro y hy
rw [Metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at hy
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hy (min_le_left _ _)
have hxyε : ∀ y : E, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → ε * ‖y - x‖ < ε := by
intro y hy
exact (mul_lt_iff_lt_one_right hε.lt).mpr (hxy y hy)
-- With a small ball in hand, apply the mean value theorem
refine
eventually_prod_iff.mpr
⟨_, b, fun e : E => Metric.ball x r e,
eventually_mem_set.mpr (Metric.nhds_basis_ball.mem_of_mem hr), fun {n} hn {y} hy => ?_⟩
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, dist_zero_left] at e ⊢
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (hxyε y hy)
exact
Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun y hy => ((e hn (hr' hy)).2.1.sub (e hn (hr' hy)).2.2).hasFDerivWithinAt)
(fun y hy => (e hn (hr' hy)).1.le) (convex_ball x r) (Metric.mem_ball_self hr) hy
· -- This is just `hfg` run through `eventually_prod_iff`
refine Metric.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff.mpr fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := (Metric.cauchy_iff.mp hfg).2 ε hε
exact
eventually_prod_iff.mpr
⟨fun n : ι × ι => f n.1 x ∈ t ∧ f n.2 x ∈ t,
eventually_prod_iff.mpr ⟨_, ht, _, ht, fun {n} hn {n'} hn' => ⟨hn, hn'⟩⟩,
fun _ => True,
by simp,
fun {n} hn {y} _ => by simpa [norm_sub_rev, dist_eq_norm] using ht' _ hn.1 _ hn.2⟩
#align uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_of_fderiv uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_of_fderiv
theorem uniformCauchySeqOn_ball_of_fderiv {r : ℝ} (hf' : UniformCauchySeqOn f' l (Metric.ball x r))
(hf : ∀ n : ι, ∀ y : E, y ∈ Metric.ball x r → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n y) y)
(hfg : Cauchy (map (fun n => f n x) l)) : UniformCauchySeqOn f l (Metric.ball x r) := by
letI : NormedSpace ℝ E := NormedSpace.restrictScalars ℝ 𝕜 _
have : NeBot l := (cauchy_map_iff.1 hfg).1
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with (hr | hr)
· simp only [Metric.ball_eq_empty.2 hr, UniformCauchySeqOn, Set.mem_empty_iff_false,
IsEmpty.forall_iff, eventually_const, imp_true_iff]
rw [SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_zero] at hf' ⊢
suffices
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (n : ι × ι) (z : E) => f n.1 z - f n.2 z - (f n.1 x - f n.2 x)) 0
(l ×ˢ l) (Metric.ball x r) ∧
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (n : ι × ι) (_ : E) => f n.1 x - f n.2 x) 0
(l ×ˢ l) (Metric.ball x r) by
have := this.1.add this.2
rw [add_zero] at this
refine this.congr ?_
filter_upwards with n z _ using (by simp)
constructor
· -- This inequality follows from the mean value theorem
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff] at hf' ⊢
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨q, hqpos, hq⟩ : ∃ q : ℝ, 0 < q ∧ q * r < ε := by
simp_rw [mul_comm]
exact exists_pos_mul_lt hε.lt r
apply (hf' q hqpos.gt).mono
intro n hn y hy
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm, Pi.zero_apply, zero_sub, norm_neg] at hn ⊢
have mvt :=
Convex.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_hasFDerivWithin_le
(fun z hz => ((hf n.1 z hz).sub (hf n.2 z hz)).hasFDerivWithinAt) (fun z hz => (hn z hz).le)
(convex_ball x r) (Metric.mem_ball_self hr) hy
refine lt_of_le_of_lt mvt ?_
have : q * ‖y - x‖ < q * r :=
mul_lt_mul' rfl.le (by simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using Metric.mem_ball.mp hy) (norm_nonneg _)
hqpos
exact this.trans hq
· -- This is just `hfg` run through `eventually_prod_iff`
refine Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff.mpr fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩ := (Metric.cauchy_iff.mp hfg).2 ε hε
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
refine ⟨fun n => f n x ∈ t, ht, fun n => f n x ∈ t, ht, ?_⟩
intro n hn n' hn' z _
rw [dist_eq_norm, Pi.zero_apply, zero_sub, norm_neg, ← dist_eq_norm]
exact ht' _ hn _ hn'
#align uniform_cauchy_seq_on_ball_of_fderiv uniformCauchySeqOn_ball_of_fderiv
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/UniformLimitsDeriv.lean | 226 | 251 | theorem cauchy_map_of_uniformCauchySeqOn_fderiv {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) (h's : IsPreconnected s)
(hf' : UniformCauchySeqOn f' l s) (hf : ∀ n : ι, ∀ y : E, y ∈ s → HasFDerivAt (f n) (f' n y) y)
{x₀ x : E} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hfg : Cauchy (map (fun n => f n x₀) l)) :
Cauchy (map (fun n => f n x) l) := by |
have : NeBot l := (cauchy_map_iff.1 hfg).1
let t := { y | y ∈ s ∧ Cauchy (map (fun n => f n y) l) }
suffices H : s ⊆ t from (H hx).2
have A : ∀ x ε, x ∈ t → Metric.ball x ε ⊆ s → Metric.ball x ε ⊆ t := fun x ε xt hx y hy =>
⟨hx hy,
(uniformCauchySeqOn_ball_of_fderiv (hf'.mono hx) (fun n y hy => hf n y (hx hy))
xt.2).cauchy_map
hy⟩
have open_t : IsOpen t := by
rw [Metric.isOpen_iff]
intro x hx
rcases Metric.isOpen_iff.1 hs x hx.1 with ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩
exact ⟨ε, εpos, A x ε hx hε⟩
have st_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty := ⟨x₀, hx₀, ⟨hx₀, hfg⟩⟩
suffices H : closure t ∩ s ⊆ t from h's.subset_of_closure_inter_subset open_t st_nonempty H
rintro x ⟨xt, xs⟩
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ (ε : ℝ), ε > 0 ∧ Metric.ball x ε ⊆ s := Metric.isOpen_iff.1 hs x xs
obtain ⟨y, yt, hxy⟩ : ∃ (y : E), y ∈ t ∧ dist x y < ε / 2 :=
Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 xt _ (half_pos εpos)
have B : Metric.ball y (ε / 2) ⊆ Metric.ball x ε := by
apply Metric.ball_subset_ball'; rw [dist_comm]; linarith
exact A y (ε / 2) yt (B.trans hε) (Metric.mem_ball.2 hxy)
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.FreeAndStrongRankCondition
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.DivisionRing
#align_import linear_algebra.finite_dimensional from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e95e4f92c8f8da3c7f693c3ec948bcf9b6683f51"
universe u v v' w
open Cardinal Submodule Module Function
abbrev FiniteDimensional (K V : Type*) [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] :=
Module.Finite K V
#align finite_dimensional FiniteDimensional
variable {K : Type u} {V : Type v}
namespace FiniteDimensional
open IsNoetherian
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] {V₂ : Type v'} [AddCommGroup V₂]
[Module K V₂]
theorem of_injective (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (w : Function.Injective f) [FiniteDimensional K V₂] :
FiniteDimensional K V :=
have : IsNoetherian K V₂ := IsNoetherian.iff_fg.mpr ‹_›
Module.Finite.of_injective f w
#align finite_dimensional.of_injective FiniteDimensional.of_injective
theorem of_surjective (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (w : Function.Surjective f) [FiniteDimensional K V] :
FiniteDimensional K V₂ :=
Module.Finite.of_surjective f w
#align finite_dimensional.of_surjective FiniteDimensional.of_surjective
variable (K V)
instance finiteDimensional_pi {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] : FiniteDimensional K (ι → K) :=
Finite.pi
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_pi FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_pi
instance finiteDimensional_pi' {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] (M : ι → Type*) [∀ i, AddCommGroup (M i)]
[∀ i, Module K (M i)] [∀ i, FiniteDimensional K (M i)] : FiniteDimensional K (∀ i, M i) :=
Finite.pi
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_pi' FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_pi'
noncomputable def fintypeOfFintype [Fintype K] [FiniteDimensional K V] : Fintype V :=
Module.fintypeOfFintype (@finsetBasis K V _ _ _ (iff_fg.2 inferInstance))
#align finite_dimensional.fintype_of_fintype FiniteDimensional.fintypeOfFintype
theorem finite_of_finite [Finite K] [FiniteDimensional K V] : Finite V := by
cases nonempty_fintype K
haveI := fintypeOfFintype K V
infer_instance
#align finite_dimensional.finite_of_finite FiniteDimensional.finite_of_finite
variable {K V}
theorem of_fintype_basis {ι : Type w} [Finite ι] (h : Basis ι K V) : FiniteDimensional K V :=
Module.Finite.of_basis h
#align finite_dimensional.of_fintype_basis FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis
noncomputable def fintypeBasisIndex {ι : Type*} [FiniteDimensional K V] (b : Basis ι K V) :
Fintype ι :=
@Fintype.ofFinite _ (Module.Finite.finite_basis b)
#align finite_dimensional.fintype_basis_index FiniteDimensional.fintypeBasisIndex
noncomputable instance [FiniteDimensional K V] : Fintype (Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex K V) := by
letI : IsNoetherian K V := IsNoetherian.iff_fg.2 inferInstance
infer_instance
theorem of_finite_basis {ι : Type w} {s : Set ι} (h : Basis s K V) (hs : Set.Finite s) :
FiniteDimensional K V :=
haveI := hs.fintype
of_fintype_basis h
#align finite_dimensional.of_finite_basis FiniteDimensional.of_finite_basis
instance finiteDimensional_submodule [FiniteDimensional K V] (S : Submodule K V) :
FiniteDimensional K S := by
letI : IsNoetherian K V := iff_fg.2 ?_
· exact
iff_fg.1
(IsNoetherian.iff_rank_lt_aleph0.2
(lt_of_le_of_lt (rank_submodule_le _) (_root_.rank_lt_aleph0 K V)))
· infer_instance
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_submodule FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_submodule
instance finiteDimensional_quotient [FiniteDimensional K V] (S : Submodule K V) :
FiniteDimensional K (V ⧸ S) :=
Module.Finite.quotient K S
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_quotient FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_quotient
variable (K V)
theorem finrank_eq_rank' [FiniteDimensional K V] : (finrank K V : Cardinal.{v}) = Module.rank K V :=
finrank_eq_rank _ _
#align finite_dimensional.finrank_eq_rank' FiniteDimensional.finrank_eq_rank'
variable {K V}
theorem finrank_of_infinite_dimensional (h : ¬FiniteDimensional K V) : finrank K V = 0 :=
FiniteDimensional.finrank_of_not_finite h
#align finite_dimensional.finrank_of_infinite_dimensional FiniteDimensional.finrank_of_infinite_dimensional
theorem of_finrank_pos (h : 0 < finrank K V) : FiniteDimensional K V :=
Module.finite_of_finrank_pos h
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_of_finrank FiniteDimensional.of_finrank_pos
theorem of_finrank_eq_succ {n : ℕ} (hn : finrank K V = n.succ) :
FiniteDimensional K V :=
Module.finite_of_finrank_eq_succ hn
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_of_finrank_eq_succ FiniteDimensional.of_finrank_eq_succ
theorem of_fact_finrank_eq_succ (n : ℕ) [hn : Fact (finrank K V = n + 1)] :
FiniteDimensional K V :=
of_finrank_eq_succ hn.out
#align finite_dimensional.fact_finite_dimensional_of_finrank_eq_succ FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_succ
theorem finiteDimensional_iff_of_rank_eq_nsmul {W} [AddCommGroup W] [Module K W] {n : ℕ}
(hn : n ≠ 0) (hVW : Module.rank K V = n • Module.rank K W) :
FiniteDimensional K V ↔ FiniteDimensional K W :=
Module.finite_iff_of_rank_eq_nsmul hn hVW
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_iff_of_rank_eq_nsmul FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_iff_of_rank_eq_nsmul
theorem finrank_eq_card_basis' [FiniteDimensional K V] {ι : Type w} (h : Basis ι K V) :
(finrank K V : Cardinal.{w}) = #ι :=
Module.mk_finrank_eq_card_basis h
#align finite_dimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis' FiniteDimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis'
theorem _root_.LinearIndependent.lt_aleph0_of_finiteDimensional {ι : Type w} [FiniteDimensional K V]
{v : ι → V} (h : LinearIndependent K v) : #ι < ℵ₀ :=
h.lt_aleph0_of_finite
#align finite_dimensional.lt_aleph_0_of_linear_independent LinearIndependent.lt_aleph0_of_finiteDimensional
@[deprecated (since := "2023-12-27")]
alias lt_aleph0_of_linearIndependent := LinearIndependent.lt_aleph0_of_finiteDimensional
theorem _root_.Submodule.eq_top_of_finrank_eq [FiniteDimensional K V] {S : Submodule K V}
(h : finrank K S = finrank K V) : S = ⊤ := by
haveI : IsNoetherian K V := iff_fg.2 inferInstance
set bS := Basis.ofVectorSpace K S with bS_eq
have : LinearIndependent K ((↑) : ((↑) '' Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex K S : Set V) → V) :=
LinearIndependent.image_subtype (f := Submodule.subtype S)
(by simpa [bS] using bS.linearIndependent) (by simp)
set b := Basis.extend this with b_eq
-- Porting note: `letI` now uses `this` so we need to give different names
letI i1 : Fintype (this.extend _) :=
(LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian (by simpa [b] using b.linearIndependent)).fintype
letI i2 : Fintype (((↑) : S → V) '' Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex K S) :=
(LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian this).fintype
letI i3 : Fintype (Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex K S) :=
(LinearIndependent.set_finite_of_isNoetherian
(by simpa [bS] using bS.linearIndependent)).fintype
have : (↑) '' Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex K S = this.extend (Set.subset_univ _) :=
Set.eq_of_subset_of_card_le (this.subset_extend _)
(by
rw [Set.card_image_of_injective _ Subtype.coe_injective, ← finrank_eq_card_basis bS, ←
finrank_eq_card_basis b, h])
rw [← b.span_eq, b_eq, Basis.coe_extend, Subtype.range_coe, ← this, ← Submodule.coeSubtype,
span_image]
have := bS.span_eq
rw [bS_eq, Basis.coe_ofVectorSpace, Subtype.range_coe] at this
rw [this, Submodule.map_top (Submodule.subtype S), range_subtype]
#align finite_dimensional.eq_top_of_finrank_eq Submodule.eq_top_of_finrank_eq
#align submodule.eq_top_of_finrank_eq Submodule.eq_top_of_finrank_eq
variable (K)
instance finiteDimensional_self : FiniteDimensional K K := inferInstance
#align finite_dimensional.finite_dimensional_self FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_self
theorem span_of_finite {A : Set V} (hA : Set.Finite A) : FiniteDimensional K (Submodule.span K A) :=
Module.Finite.span_of_finite K hA
#align finite_dimensional.span_of_finite FiniteDimensional.span_of_finite
instance span_singleton (x : V) : FiniteDimensional K (K ∙ x) :=
Module.Finite.span_singleton K x
#align finite_dimensional.span_singleton FiniteDimensional.span_singleton
instance span_finset (s : Finset V) : FiniteDimensional K (span K (s : Set V)) :=
Module.Finite.span_finset K s
#align finite_dimensional.span_finset FiniteDimensional.span_finset
instance (f : V →ₗ[K] V₂) (p : Submodule K V) [FiniteDimensional K p] :
FiniteDimensional K (p.map f) :=
Module.Finite.map _ _
variable {K}
section
open Finset
section
variable {L : Type*} [LinearOrderedField L]
variable {W : Type v} [AddCommGroup W] [Module L W]
theorem exists_relation_sum_zero_pos_coefficient_of_finrank_succ_lt_card [FiniteDimensional L W]
{t : Finset W} (h : finrank L W + 1 < t.card) :
∃ f : W → L, ∑ e ∈ t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∑ e ∈ t, f e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, 0 < f x := by
obtain ⟨f, sum, total, nonzero⟩ :=
Module.exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_finrank_succ_lt_card h
exact ⟨f, sum, total, exists_pos_of_sum_zero_of_exists_nonzero f total nonzero⟩
#align finite_dimensional.exists_relation_sum_zero_pos_coefficient_of_rank_succ_lt_card FiniteDimensional.exists_relation_sum_zero_pos_coefficient_of_finrank_succ_lt_card
end
end
@[simps repr_apply]
noncomputable def basisSingleton (ι : Type*) [Unique ι] (h : finrank K V = 1) (v : V)
(hv : v ≠ 0) : Basis ι K V :=
let b := FiniteDimensional.basisUnique ι h
let h : b.repr v default ≠ 0 := mt FiniteDimensional.basisUnique_repr_eq_zero_iff.mp hv
Basis.ofRepr
{ toFun := fun w => Finsupp.single default (b.repr w default / b.repr v default)
invFun := fun f => f default • v
map_add' := by simp [add_div]
map_smul' := by simp [mul_div]
left_inv := fun w => by
apply_fun b.repr using b.repr.toEquiv.injective
apply_fun Equiv.finsuppUnique
simp only [LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ, Finsupp.coe_smul, Finsupp.single_eq_same,
smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply, Equiv.finsuppUnique_apply]
exact div_mul_cancel₀ _ h
right_inv := fun f => by
ext
simp only [LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ, Finsupp.coe_smul, Finsupp.single_eq_same,
RingHom.id_apply, smul_eq_mul, Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ h }
#align finite_dimensional.basis_singleton FiniteDimensional.basisSingleton
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FiniteDimensional.lean | 332 | 335 | theorem basisSingleton_apply (ι : Type*) [Unique ι] (h : finrank K V = 1) (v : V) (hv : v ≠ 0)
(i : ι) : basisSingleton ι h v hv i = v := by |
cases Unique.uniq ‹Unique ι› i
simp [basisSingleton]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 347 | 348 | theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by | simp [reverse]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import topology.continuous_on from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
#align nhds_bind_nhds_within nhds_bind_nhdsWithin
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
#align eventually_nhds_nhds_within eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align eventually_nhds_within_iff eventually_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
#align frequently_nhds_within_iff frequently_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
#align mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
#align eventually_nhds_within_nhds_within eventually_nhdsWithin_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
#align nhds_within_eq nhdsWithin_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align nhds_within_univ nhdsWithin_univ
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set α} {a : α} (h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s)
(t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
#align nhds_within_has_basis nhdsWithin_hasBasis
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
#align nhds_within_basis_open nhdsWithin_basis_open
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within mem_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_compl diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
#align diff_mem_nhds_within_diff diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
#align nhds_of_nhds_within_of_nhds nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
#align mem_nhds_within_iff_eventually_eq mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
#align nhds_within_eq_iff_eventually_eq nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
#align nhds_within_le_iff nhdsWithin_le_iff
-- Porting note: golfed, dropped an unneeded assumption
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced' preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced'ₓ
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
#align mem_nhds_within_of_mem_nhds mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
#align self_mem_nhds_within self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
#align eventually_mem_nhds_within eventually_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
#align inter_mem_nhds_within inter_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_mono (a : α) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝[t] a :=
inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr h)
#align nhds_within_mono nhdsWithin_mono
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
#align pure_le_nhds_within pure_le_nhdsWithin
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
#align mem_of_mem_nhds_within mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds_within Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds_within tendsto_const_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
#align nhds_within_restrict'' nhdsWithin_restrict''
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
#align nhds_within_restrict' nhdsWithin_restrict'
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
#align nhds_within_restrict nhdsWithin_restrict
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
#align nhds_within_le_of_mem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
#align nhds_within_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within' nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin'
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds_within nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
#align nhds_within_eq_nhds nhdsWithin_eq_nhds
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
#align is_open.nhds_within_eq IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
#align preimage_nhds_within_coinduced preimage_nhds_within_coinduced
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
#align nhds_within_empty nhdsWithin_empty
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
#align nhds_within_union nhdsWithin_union
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a :=
Set.Finite.induction_on hI (by simp) fun _ _ hT ↦ by
simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
#align nhds_within_bUnion nhdsWithin_biUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
#align nhds_within_sUnion nhdsWithin_sUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
#align nhds_within_Union nhdsWithin_iUnion
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
#align nhds_within_inter nhdsWithin_inter
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
#align nhds_within_inter' nhdsWithin_inter'
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
#align nhds_within_inter_of_mem' nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem'
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
#align nhds_within_singleton nhdsWithin_singleton
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
#align nhds_within_insert nhdsWithin_insert
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
#align mem_nhds_within_insert mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
insert a t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a := by simp [mem_of_superset h]
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_insert
theorem insert_mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝[≠] a := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, mem_inf_principal, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left,
insert_def]
#align insert_mem_nhds_iff insert_mem_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure (a : α) : 𝓝[≠] a ⊔ pure a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_singleton, ← nhdsWithin_union, compl_union_self, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align nhds_within_compl_singleton_sup_pure nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_sup_pure
theorem nhdsWithin_prod {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{s u : Set α} {t v : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] a) (hv : v ∈ 𝓝[t] b) :
u ×ˢ v ∈ 𝓝[s ×ˢ t] (a, b) := by
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod hu hv
#align nhds_within_prod nhdsWithin_prod
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq' {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i) ⊓ ⨅ (_ : i ∈ I), 𝓟 (s i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, comap_inf, comap_iInf, pi_def, comap_principal, ←
iInf_principal_finite hI, ← iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq' nhdsWithin_pi_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
(hI : I.Finite) (s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi I s] x =
(⨅ i ∈ I, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i)) ⊓
⨅ (i) (_ : i ∉ I), comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝 (x i)) := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, Filter.pi, pi_def, ← iInf_principal_finite hI, comap_inf,
comap_principal, eval]
rw [iInf_split _ fun i => i ∈ I, inf_right_comm]
simp only [iInf_inf_eq]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq nhdsWithin_pi_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)]
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) (x : ∀ i, α i) :
𝓝[pi univ s] x = ⨅ i, comap (fun x => x i) (𝓝[s i] x i) := by
simpa [nhdsWithin] using nhdsWithin_pi_eq finite_univ s x
#align nhds_within_pi_univ_eq nhdsWithin_pi_univ_eq
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : 𝓝[pi I s] x = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] x i = ⊥ := by
simp only [nhdsWithin, nhds_pi, pi_inf_principal_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_eq_bot nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot
theorem nhdsWithin_pi_neBot {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : (𝓝[pi I s] x).NeBot ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, (𝓝[s i] x i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff, nhdsWithin_pi_eq_bot]
#align nhds_within_pi_ne_bot nhdsWithin_pi_neBot
theorem Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {t : Set α} [∀ x, Decidable (x ∈ t)]
{a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ t] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ tᶜ] a) l) : Tendsto (piecewise t f g) (𝓝[s] a) l := by
apply Tendsto.piecewise <;> rwa [← nhdsWithin_inter']
#align filter.tendsto.piecewise_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.piecewise_nhdsWithin
theorem Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {a : α}
{s : Set α} {l : Filter β} (h₀ : Tendsto f (𝓝[s ∩ { x | p x }] a) l)
(h₁ : Tendsto g (𝓝[s ∩ { x | ¬p x }] a) l) :
Tendsto (fun x => if p x then f x else g x) (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h₀.piecewise_nhdsWithin h₁
#align filter.tendsto.if_nhds_within Filter.Tendsto.if_nhdsWithin
theorem map_nhdsWithin (f : α → β) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
map f (𝓝[s] a) = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (f '' (t ∩ s)) :=
((nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds_within map_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left {f : α → β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} {l : Filter β} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝[t] a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left <| nhdsWithin_mono a hst
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_left tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_left
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right {f : β → α} {l : Filter β} {a : α} {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[t] a) :=
h.mono_right (nhdsWithin_mono a hst)
#align tendsto_nhds_within_mono_right tendsto_nhdsWithin_mono_right
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f (𝓝 a) l) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l :=
h.mono_left inf_le_left
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
theorem eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ∈ s := by
simp_rw [nhdsWithin_eq, tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, tendsto_principal, mem_inter_iff,
eventually_and] at h
exact (h univ ⟨mem_univ a, isOpen_univ⟩).2
#align eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhds_within eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : β → α} {a : α} {s : Set α} {l : Filter β}
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
h.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhds_within tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem {s : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ s) : NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 <| subset_closure hx
#align nhds_within_ne_bot_of_mem nhdsWithin_neBot_of_mem
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) {x : α}
(hx : NeBot <| 𝓝[s] x) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_eq ▸ mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.2 hx
#align is_closed.mem_of_nhds_within_ne_bot IsClosed.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α} (h : DenseRange f) (x : α) :
NeBot (𝓝[range f] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.1 (h x)
#align dense_range.nhds_within_ne_bot DenseRange.nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem mem_closure_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {I : Set ι}
{s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} {x : ∀ i, α i} : x ∈ closure (pi I s) ↔ ∀ i ∈ I, x i ∈ closure (s i) := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, nhdsWithin_pi_neBot]
#align mem_closure_pi mem_closure_pi
theorem closure_pi_set {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (I : Set ι)
(s : ∀ i, Set (α i)) : closure (pi I s) = pi I fun i => closure (s i) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_pi
#align closure_pi_set closure_pi_set
theorem dense_pi {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)}
(I : Set ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ I, Dense (s i)) : Dense (pi I s) := by
simp only [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_pi_set, pi_congr rfl fun i hi => (hs i hi).closure_eq,
pi_univ]
#align dense_pi dense_pi
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
mem_inf_principal
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_iff eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_iff
theorem eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_eq_nhds_within_of_eq_on eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g :=
eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn h
#align set.eq_on.eventually_eq_nhds_within Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} {a : α} {l : Filter β}
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = g x) (hf : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l) : Tendsto g (𝓝[s] a) l :=
(tendsto_congr' <| eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin_of_eqOn hfg).1 hf
#align tendsto_nhds_within_congr tendsto_nhdsWithin_congr
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall {s : Set α} {a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_inf_of_right h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_forall eventually_nhdsWithin_of_forall
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α}
(f : β → α) (h1 : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) (h2 : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) : Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h1, tendsto_principal.2 h2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[s] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) ∧ ∀ᶠ n in l, f n ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h, eventually_mem_of_tendsto_nhdsWithin h⟩, fun h =>
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ h.1 h.2⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff
@[simp]
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_range {a : α} {l : Filter β} {f : β → α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝[range f] a) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => h.mono_right inf_le_left, fun h =>
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall mem_range_self⟩⟩
#align tendsto_nhds_within_range tendsto_nhdsWithin_range
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} {a : α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] a] g)
(hmem : a ∈ s) : f a = g a :=
h.self_of_nhdsWithin hmem
#align filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds_within Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhdsWithin
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α}
{a : α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h
#align eventually_nhds_within_of_eventually_nhds eventually_nhdsWithin_of_eventually_nhds
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_subtype {s : Set α} {a : { x // x ∈ s }} {t u : Set { x // x ∈ s }} :
t ∈ 𝓝[u] a ↔ t ∈ comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' u] a) := by
rw [nhdsWithin, nhds_subtype, principal_subtype, ← comap_inf, ← nhdsWithin]
#align mem_nhds_within_subtype mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_subtype (s : Set α) (a : { x // x ∈ s }) (t : Set { x // x ∈ s }) :
𝓝[t] a = comap ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝[(↑) '' t] a) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => mem_nhdsWithin_subtype
#align nhds_within_subtype nhdsWithin_subtype
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) :
𝓝[s] a = map ((↑) : s → α) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) :=
(map_nhds_subtype_val ⟨a, h⟩).symm
#align nhds_within_eq_map_subtype_coe nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe
theorem mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set α} {a : s} {t : Set s} :
t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ (↑) '' t ∈ 𝓝[s] (a : α) := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, image_mem_map_iff Subtype.val_injective]
#align mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhds_within mem_nhds_subtype_iff_nhdsWithin
theorem preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype {s t : Set α} {a : s} : (↑) ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] ↑a := by
rw [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
#align preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem eventually_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∀ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
preimage_coe_mem_nhds_subtype
theorem frequently_nhds_subtype_iff (s : Set α) (a : s) (P : α → Prop) :
(∃ᶠ x : s in 𝓝 a, P x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, P x :=
eventually_nhds_subtype_iff s a (¬ P ·) |>.not
theorem tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (f : α → β) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) l ↔ Tendsto (s.restrict f) (𝓝 ⟨a, h⟩) l := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_map_subtype_coe h, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
#align tendsto_nhds_within_iff_subtype tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [TopologicalSpace δ]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : x ∈ s) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
hf x hx
#align continuous_on.continuous_within_at ContinuousOn.continuousWithinAt
theorem continuousWithinAt_univ (f : α → β) (x : α) :
ContinuousWithinAt f Set.univ x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_within_at_univ continuousWithinAt_univ
theorem continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ {f : α → β} : Continuous f ↔ ContinuousOn f univ := by
simp [continuous_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousOn, ContinuousAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align continuous_iff_continuous_on_univ continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict (f : α → β) {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x ∈ s) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt (s.restrict f) ⟨x, h⟩ :=
tendsto_nhdsWithin_iff_subtype h f _
#align continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at_restrict continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[t] f x) :=
tendsto_inf.2 ⟨h, tendsto_principal.2 <| mem_inf_of_right <| mem_principal.2 <| ht⟩
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
h.tendsto_nhdsWithin (mapsTo_image _ _)
#align continuous_within_at.tendsto_nhds_within_image ContinuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α} {y : β}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t y) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at *
rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq, Prod.map, nhds_prod_eq]
exact hf.prod_map hg
#align continuous_within_at.prod_map ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) {b | (x.1, b) ∈ s} x.2 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β]
{f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) {a | (a, x.2) ∈ s} x.1 := by
rw [← x.eta]; simp_rw [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, prod_pure,
← map_inf_principal_preimage]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨x.1, ·⟩) x.2 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuousAt_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {x : α × β} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ⟨·, x.2⟩) x.1 := by
simp_rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ]; exact continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ a, ContinuousOn (f ⟨a, ·⟩) {b | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_left]; rfl
theorem continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} {s : Set (α × β)} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b, ContinuousOn (f ⟨·, b⟩) {a | (a, b) ∈ s} := by
simp_rw [ContinuousOn, Prod.forall, continuousWithinAt_prod_of_discrete_right]; apply forall_swap
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ a, Continuous (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_left
theorem continuous_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Continuous (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]; exact continuousOn_prod_of_discrete_right
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_left [DiscreteTopology α] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ a, IsOpenMap (f ⟨a, ·⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, nhds_prod_eq, nhds_discrete, pure_prod, map_map]
rfl
theorem isOpenMap_prod_of_discrete_right [DiscreteTopology β] {f : α × β → γ} :
IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ b, IsOpenMap (f ⟨·, b⟩) := by
simp_rw [isOpenMap_iff_nhds_le, Prod.forall, forall_swap (α := α) (β := β), nhds_prod_eq,
nhds_discrete, prod_pure, map_map]; rfl
theorem continuousWithinAt_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (fun y => f y i) s x :=
tendsto_pi_nhds
#align continuous_within_at_pi continuousWithinAt_pi
theorem continuousOn_pi {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} : ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (fun y => f y i) s :=
⟨fun h i x hx => tendsto_pi_nhds.1 (h x hx) i, fun h x hx => tendsto_pi_nhds.2 fun i => h i x hx⟩
#align continuous_on_pi continuousOn_pi
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_pi' {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, π i} {s : Set α} (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn (fun y => f y i) s) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
continuousOn_pi.2 hf
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : α → π i} {a : α} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) {g : α → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s a) : ContinuousWithinAt (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) s a :=
hf.tendsto.fin_insertNth i hg
#align continuous_within_at.fin_insert_nth ContinuousWithinAt.fin_insertNth
nonrec theorem ContinuousOn.fin_insertNth {n} {π : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (π i)] (i : Fin (n + 1)) {f : α → π i} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {g : α → ∀ j : Fin n, π (i.succAbove j)} (hg : ContinuousOn g s) :
ContinuousOn (fun a => i.insertNth (f a) (g a)) s := fun a ha =>
(hf a ha).fin_insertNth i (hg a ha)
#align continuous_on.fin_insert_nth ContinuousOn.fin_insertNth
theorem continuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → f x ∈ t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := by
simp only [ContinuousOn, ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds, mem_nhdsWithin]
#align continuous_on_iff continuousOn_iff
theorem continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ Continuous (s.restrict f) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, continuous_iff_continuousAt]; constructor
· rintro h ⟨x, xs⟩
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mp (h x xs)
intro h x xs
exact (continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt_restrict f xs).mpr (h ⟨x, xs⟩)
#align continuous_on_iff_continuous_restrict continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
-- Porting note: 2 new lemmas
alias ⟨ContinuousOn.restrict, _⟩ := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict
theorem ContinuousOn.restrict_mapsTo {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : MapsTo f s t) : Continuous (ht.restrict f s t) :=
hf.restrict.codRestrict _
theorem continuousOn_iff' {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsOpen t → ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsOpen (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isOpen_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff]
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨u, ou, useq⟩
exact ⟨u, ou, by simpa only [Set.inter_comm, eq_comm] using useq⟩
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_def]; simp only [this]
#align continuous_on_iff' continuousOn_iff'
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_dom {α β : Type*} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₁) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₂ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
map_mono (inf_le_inf_right _ <| nhds_mono h₁) (h₂ x hx hu)
#align continuous_on.mono_dom ContinuousOn.mono_dom
theorem ContinuousOn.mono_rng {α β : Type*} {t₁ : TopologicalSpace α} {t₂ t₃ : TopologicalSpace β}
(h₁ : t₂ ≤ t₃) {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (h₂ : @ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₂ f s) :
@ContinuousOn α β t₁ t₃ f s := fun x hx _u hu =>
h₂ x hx <| nhds_mono h₁ hu
#align continuous_on.mono_rng ContinuousOn.mono_rng
theorem continuousOn_iff_isClosed {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ t : Set β, IsClosed t → ∃ u, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
have : ∀ t, IsClosed (s.restrict f ⁻¹' t) ↔ ∃ u : Set α, IsClosed u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s := by
intro t
rw [isClosed_induced_iff, Set.restrict_eq, Set.preimage_comp]
simp only [Subtype.preimage_coe_eq_preimage_coe_iff, eq_comm, Set.inter_comm s]
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict, continuous_iff_isClosed]; simp only [this]
#align continuous_on_iff_is_closed continuousOn_iff_isClosed
theorem ContinuousOn.prod_map {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g t) : ContinuousOn (Prod.map f g) (s ×ˢ t) :=
fun ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨hx, hy⟩ => ContinuousWithinAt.prod_map (hf x hx) (hg y hy)
#align continuous_on.prod_map ContinuousOn.prod_map
theorem continuous_of_cover_nhds {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ x : α, ∃ i, s i ∈ 𝓝 x) (hf : ∀ i, ContinuousOn f (s i)) :
Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x ↦ let ⟨i, hi⟩ := hs x; by
rw [ContinuousAt, ← nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hi]
exact hf _ _ (mem_of_mem_nhds hi)
#align continuous_of_cover_nhds continuous_of_cover_nhds
theorem continuousOn_empty (f : α → β) : ContinuousOn f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
#align continuous_on_empty continuousOn_empty
@[simp]
theorem continuousOn_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ContinuousOn f {a} :=
forall_eq.2 <| by
simpa only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_left] using fun s =>
mem_of_mem_nhds
#align continuous_on_singleton continuousOn_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) :
ContinuousOn f s :=
hs.induction_on (continuousOn_empty f) (continuousOn_singleton f)
#align set.subsingleton.continuous_on Set.Subsingleton.continuousOn
theorem nhdsWithin_le_comap {x : α} {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (ctsf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
𝓝[s] x ≤ comap f (𝓝[f '' s] f x) :=
ctsf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_image.le_comap
#align nhds_within_le_comap nhdsWithin_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem comap_nhdsWithin_range {α} (f : α → β) (y : β) : comap f (𝓝[range f] y) = comap f (𝓝 y) :=
comap_inf_principal_range
#align comap_nhds_within_range comap_nhdsWithin_range
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x)
(hs : s ⊆ t) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono x hs)
#align continuous_within_at.mono ContinuousWithinAt.mono
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) (hs : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
h.mono_left (nhdsWithin_le_of_mem hs)
#align continuous_within_at.mono_of_mem ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem
theorem continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, h]
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter' {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict'' s h]
#align continuous_within_at_inter' continuousWithinAt_inter'
theorem continuousWithinAt_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∩ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_restrict' s h]
#align continuous_within_at_inter continuousWithinAt_inter
theorem continuousWithinAt_union {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt f t x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_union, tendsto_sup]
#align continuous_within_at_union continuousWithinAt_union
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.union {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x)
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s ∪ t) x :=
continuousWithinAt_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
#align continuous_within_at.union ContinuousWithinAt.union
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
haveI := mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 hx
mem_closure_of_tendsto h <| mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_preimage_image f s)
#align continuous_within_at.mem_closure_image ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure_image
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} {A : Set β}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hA : MapsTo f s A) : f x ∈ closure A :=
closure_mono (image_subset_iff.2 hA) (h.mem_closure_image hx)
#align continuous_within_at.mem_closure ContinuousWithinAt.mem_closure
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
(h : MapsTo f s t) (hc : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) := fun x hx => (hc x hx).mem_closure hx h
#align set.maps_to.closure_of_continuous_within_at Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousWithinAt
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousOn {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hc : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) : MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) :=
h.closure_of_continuousWithinAt fun x hx => (hc x hx).mono subset_closure
#align set.maps_to.closure_of_continuous_on Set.MapsTo.closure_of_continuousOn
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.image_closure {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
((mapsTo_image f s).closure_of_continuousWithinAt hf).image_subset
#align continuous_within_at.image_closure ContinuousWithinAt.image_closure
theorem ContinuousOn.image_closure {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
ContinuousWithinAt.image_closure fun x hx => (hf x hx).mono subset_closure
#align continuous_on.image_closure ContinuousOn.image_closure
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_singleton {f : α → β} {x : α} : ContinuousWithinAt f {x} x := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_singleton, tendsto_pure_nhds]
#align continuous_within_at_singleton continuousWithinAt_singleton
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_insert_self {f : α → β} {x : α} {s : Set α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f (insert x s) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
simp only [← singleton_union, continuousWithinAt_union, continuousWithinAt_singleton,
true_and_iff]
#align continuous_within_at_insert_self continuousWithinAt_insert_self
alias ⟨_, ContinuousWithinAt.insert_self⟩ := continuousWithinAt_insert_self
#align continuous_within_at.insert_self ContinuousWithinAt.insert_self
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
(ht : ContinuousWithinAt f t x) : ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ t) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
⟨fun h => (h.union ht).mono <| by simp only [diff_union_self, subset_union_left], fun h =>
h.mono diff_subset⟩
#align continuous_within_at.diff_iff ContinuousWithinAt.diff_iff
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_diff_self {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f (s \ {x}) x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
continuousWithinAt_singleton.diff_iff
#align continuous_within_at_diff_self continuousWithinAt_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_compl_self {f : α → β} {a : α} :
ContinuousWithinAt f {a}ᶜ a ↔ ContinuousAt f a := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, continuousWithinAt_diff_self, continuousWithinAt_univ]
#align continuous_within_at_compl_self continuousWithinAt_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_update_same [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} {y : β} :
ContinuousWithinAt (update f x y) s x ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y) :=
calc
ContinuousWithinAt (update f x y) s x ↔ Tendsto (update f x y) (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y) := by
{ rw [← continuousWithinAt_diff_self, ContinuousWithinAt, update_same] }
_ ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y) :=
tendsto_congr' <| eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall
fun z hz => update_noteq hz.2 _ _
#align continuous_within_at_update_same continuousWithinAt_update_same
@[simp]
theorem continuousAt_update_same [DecidableEq α] {f : α → β} {x : α} {y : β} :
ContinuousAt (Function.update f x y) x ↔ Tendsto f (𝓝[≠] x) (𝓝 y) := by
rw [← continuousWithinAt_univ, continuousWithinAt_update_same, compl_eq_univ_diff]
#align continuous_at_update_same continuousAt_update_same
theorem IsOpenMap.continuousOn_image_of_leftInvOn {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : IsOpenMap (s.restrict f)) {finv : β → α} (hleft : LeftInvOn finv f s) :
ContinuousOn finv (f '' s) := by
refine continuousOn_iff'.2 fun t ht => ⟨f '' (t ∩ s), ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← image_restrict]
exact h _ (ht.preimage continuous_subtype_val)
· rw [inter_eq_self_of_subset_left (image_subset f inter_subset_right), hleft.image_inter']
#align is_open_map.continuous_on_image_of_left_inv_on IsOpenMap.continuousOn_image_of_leftInvOn
theorem IsOpenMap.continuousOn_range_of_leftInverse {f : α → β} (hf : IsOpenMap f) {finv : β → α}
(hleft : Function.LeftInverse finv f) : ContinuousOn finv (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact (hf.restrict isOpen_univ).continuousOn_image_of_leftInvOn fun x _ => hleft x
#align is_open_map.continuous_on_range_of_left_inverse IsOpenMap.continuousOn_range_of_leftInverse
theorem ContinuousOn.congr_mono {f g : α → β} {s s₁ : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(h' : EqOn g f s₁) (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s) : ContinuousOn g s₁ := by
intro x hx
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
have A := (h x (h₁ hx)).mono h₁
unfold ContinuousWithinAt at A
rw [← h' hx] at A
exact A.congr' h'.eventuallyEq_nhdsWithin.symm
#align continuous_on.congr_mono ContinuousOn.congr_mono
theorem ContinuousOn.congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s :=
h.congr_mono h' (Subset.refl _)
#align continuous_on.congr ContinuousOn.congr
theorem continuousOn_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h' : EqOn g f s) :
ContinuousOn g s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
⟨fun h => ContinuousOn.congr h h'.symm, fun h => h.congr h'⟩
#align continuous_on_congr continuousOn_congr
theorem ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
ContinuousWithinAt.mono ((continuousWithinAt_univ f x).2 h) (subset_univ _)
#align continuous_at.continuous_within_at ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ↔ ContinuousAt f x := by
rw [← univ_inter s, continuousWithinAt_inter h, continuousWithinAt_univ]
#align continuous_within_at_iff_continuous_at continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt hs).mp h
#align continuous_within_at.continuous_at ContinuousWithinAt.continuousAt
theorem IsOpen.continuousOn_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : IsOpen s) :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ContinuousAt f a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ => continuousWithinAt_iff_continuousAt ∘ hs.mem_nhds
#align is_open.continuous_on_iff IsOpen.continuousOn_iff
theorem ContinuousOn.continuousAt {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : ContinuousOn f s)
(hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : ContinuousAt f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).continuousAt hx
#align continuous_on.continuous_at ContinuousOn.continuousAt
theorem ContinuousAt.continuousOn {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hcont : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) :
ContinuousOn f s := fun x hx => (hcont x hx).continuousWithinAt
#align continuous_at.continuous_on ContinuousAt.continuousOn
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (h : MapsTo f s t) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.tendsto.comp (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin h)
#align continuous_within_at.comp ContinuousWithinAt.comp
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.comp' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {x : α}
(hg : ContinuousWithinAt g t (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) x :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
#align continuous_within_at.comp' ContinuousWithinAt.comp'
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(hg : ContinuousAt g (f x)) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) : ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f) s x :=
hg.continuousWithinAt.comp hf (mapsTo_univ _ _)
#align continuous_at.comp_continuous_within_at ContinuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
theorem ContinuousOn.comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) s := fun x hx =>
ContinuousWithinAt.comp (hg _ (h hx)) (hf x hx) h
#align continuous_on.comp ContinuousOn.comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp'' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : Set.MapsTo f s t) : ContinuousOn (fun x => g (f x)) s :=
ContinuousOn.comp hg hf h
theorem ContinuousOn.mono {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (h : t ⊆ s) :
ContinuousOn f t := fun x hx => (hf x (h hx)).mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono _ h)
#align continuous_on.mono ContinuousOn.mono
theorem antitone_continuousOn {f : α → β} : Antitone (ContinuousOn f) := fun _s _t hst hf =>
hf.mono hst
#align antitone_continuous_on antitone_continuousOn
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousOn.comp' {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hg : ContinuousOn g t)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (g ∘ f) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) :=
hg.comp (hf.mono inter_subset_left) inter_subset_right
#align continuous_on.comp' ContinuousOn.comp'
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 958 | 960 | theorem Continuous.continuousOn {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : Continuous f) : ContinuousOn f s := by |
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ] at h
exact h.mono (subset_univ _)
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Maps
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.subgraph from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c6ef6387ede9983aee397d442974e61f89dfd87b"
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
@[ext]
structure Subgraph {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) where
verts : Set V
Adj : V → V → Prop
adj_sub : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → G.Adj v w
edge_vert : ∀ {v w : V}, Adj v w → v ∈ verts
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph -- Porting note: Originally `by obviously`
#align simple_graph.subgraph SimpleGraph.Subgraph
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph.Subgraph (Adj → adj)
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} {W : Type v}
@[simps]
protected def singletonSubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v}
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm _ _ := False.elim
#align simple_graph.singleton_subgraph SimpleGraph.singletonSubgraph
@[simps]
def subgraphOfAdj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : G.Subgraph where
verts := {v, w}
Adj a b := s(v, w) = s(a, b)
adj_sub h := by
rw [← G.mem_edgeSet, ← h]
exact hvw
edge_vert {a b} h := by
apply_fun fun e ↦ a ∈ e at h
simp only [Sym2.mem_iff, true_or, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h
exact h
#align simple_graph.subgraph_of_adj SimpleGraph.subgraphOfAdj
namespace Subgraph
variable {G : SimpleGraph V} {G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph} {a b : V}
protected theorem loopless (G' : Subgraph G) : Irreflexive G'.Adj :=
fun v h ↦ G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub h)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.loopless SimpleGraph.Subgraph.loopless
theorem adj_comm (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : G'.Adj v w ↔ G'.Adj w v :=
⟨fun x ↦ G'.symm x, fun x ↦ G'.symm x⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj_comm SimpleGraph.Subgraph.adj_comm
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (G' : Subgraph G) {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj_symm SimpleGraph.Subgraph.adj_symm
protected theorem Adj.symm {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : V} (h : G'.Adj u v) : G'.Adj v u :=
G'.symm h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.symm SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.symm
protected theorem Adj.adj_sub {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
H.adj_sub h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.adj_sub SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.adj_sub
protected theorem Adj.fst_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ∈ H.verts :=
H.edge_vert h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.fst_mem SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.fst_mem
protected theorem Adj.snd_mem {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : v ∈ H.verts :=
h.symm.fst_mem
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.snd_mem SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.snd_mem
protected theorem Adj.ne {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) : u ≠ v :=
h.adj_sub.ne
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.ne SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.ne
@[simps]
protected def coe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph G'.verts where
Adj v w := G'.Adj v w
symm _ _ h := G'.symm h
loopless v h := loopless G v (G'.adj_sub h)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_adj_sub (G' : Subgraph G) (u v : G'.verts) (h : G'.coe.Adj u v) : G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.coe_adj_sub SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coe_adj_sub
-- Given `h : H.Adj u v`, then `h.coe : H.coe.Adj ⟨u, _⟩ ⟨v, _⟩`.
protected theorem Adj.coe {H : G.Subgraph} {u v : V} (h : H.Adj u v) :
H.coe.Adj ⟨u, H.edge_vert h⟩ ⟨v, H.edge_vert h.symm⟩ := h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.coe
def IsSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ v : V, v ∈ G'.verts
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_spanning SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsSpanning
theorem isSpanning_iff {G' : Subgraph G} : G'.IsSpanning ↔ G'.verts = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_spanning_iff SimpleGraph.Subgraph.isSpanning_iff
@[simps]
protected def spanningCoe (G' : Subgraph G) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := G'.Adj
symm := G'.symm
loopless v hv := G.loopless v (G'.adj_sub hv)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe
@[simp]
theorem Adj.of_spanningCoe {G' : Subgraph G} {u v : G'.verts} (h : G'.spanningCoe.Adj u v) :
G.Adj u v :=
G'.adj_sub h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.adj.of_spanning_coe SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Adj.of_spanningCoe
theorem spanningCoe_inj : G₁.spanningCoe = G₂.spanningCoe ↔ G₁.Adj = G₂.Adj := by
simp [Subgraph.spanningCoe]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_inj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe_inj
@[simps]
def spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning (G' : Subgraph G) (h : G'.IsSpanning) :
G'.spanningCoe ≃g G'.coe where
toFun v := ⟨v, h v⟩
invFun v := v
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_equiv_coe_of_spanning SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoeEquivCoeOfSpanning
def IsInduced (G' : Subgraph G) : Prop :=
∀ {v w : V}, v ∈ G'.verts → w ∈ G'.verts → G.Adj v w → G'.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.subgraph.is_induced SimpleGraph.Subgraph.IsInduced
def support (H : Subgraph G) : Set V := Rel.dom H.Adj
#align simple_graph.subgraph.support SimpleGraph.Subgraph.support
theorem mem_support (H : Subgraph G) {v : V} : v ∈ H.support ↔ ∃ w, H.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_support SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_support
theorem support_subset_verts (H : Subgraph G) : H.support ⊆ H.verts :=
fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ H.edge_vert h
#align simple_graph.subgraph.support_subset_verts SimpleGraph.Subgraph.support_subset_verts
def neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set V := {w | G'.Adj v w}
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet
theorem neighborSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
fun _ ↦ G'.adj_sub
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_subset SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_subset
theorem neighborSet_subset_verts (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.neighborSet v ⊆ G'.verts :=
fun _ h ↦ G'.edge_vert (adj_symm G' h)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_subset_verts SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_subset_verts
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v w : V) : w ∈ G'.neighborSet v ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_neighbor_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_neighborSet
def coeNeighborSetEquiv {G' : Subgraph G} (v : G'.verts) :
G'.coe.neighborSet v ≃ G'.neighborSet v where
toFun w := ⟨w, w.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨⟨w, G'.edge_vert (G'.adj_symm w.2)⟩, w.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.coe_neighbor_set_equiv SimpleGraph.Subgraph.coeNeighborSetEquiv
def edgeSet (G' : Subgraph G) : Set (Sym2 V) := Sym2.fromRel G'.symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet
theorem edgeSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) : G'.edgeSet ⊆ G.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ ↦ G'.adj_sub)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_subset SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_subset
@[simp]
theorem mem_edgeSet {G' : Subgraph G} {v w : V} : s(v, w) ∈ G'.edgeSet ↔ G'.Adj v w := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_edgeSet
theorem mem_verts_if_mem_edge {G' : Subgraph G} {e : Sym2 V} {v : V} (he : e ∈ G'.edgeSet)
(hv : v ∈ e) : v ∈ G'.verts := by
revert hv
refine Sym2.ind (fun v w he ↦ ?_) e he
intro hv
rcases Sym2.mem_iff.mp hv with (rfl | rfl)
· exact G'.edge_vert he
· exact G'.edge_vert (G'.symm he)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.mem_verts_if_mem_edge SimpleGraph.Subgraph.mem_verts_if_mem_edge
def incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) := {e ∈ G'.edgeSet | v ∈ e}
#align simple_graph.subgraph.incidence_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) :
G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.incidenceSet v :=
fun _ h ↦ ⟨G'.edgeSet_subset h.1, h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.incidence_set_subset_incidence_set SimpleGraph.Subgraph.incidenceSet_subset_incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_subset (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) : G'.incidenceSet v ⊆ G'.edgeSet :=
fun _ h ↦ h.1
#align simple_graph.subgraph.incidence_set_subset SimpleGraph.Subgraph.incidenceSet_subset
abbrev vert (G' : Subgraph G) (v : V) (h : v ∈ G'.verts) : G'.verts := ⟨v, h⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.vert SimpleGraph.Subgraph.vert
def copy (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : Subgraph G where
verts := V''
Adj := adj'
adj_sub := hadj.symm ▸ G'.adj_sub
edge_vert := hV.symm ▸ hadj.symm ▸ G'.edge_vert
symm := hadj.symm ▸ G'.symm
#align simple_graph.subgraph.copy SimpleGraph.Subgraph.copy
theorem copy_eq (G' : Subgraph G) (V'' : Set V) (hV : V'' = G'.verts)
(adj' : V → V → Prop) (hadj : adj' = G'.Adj) : G'.copy V'' hV adj' hadj = G' :=
Subgraph.ext _ _ hV hadj
#align simple_graph.subgraph.copy_eq SimpleGraph.Subgraph.copy_eq
instance : Sup G.Subgraph where
sup G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊔ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => Or.elim hab (fun h => G₁.adj_sub h) fun h => G₂.adj_sub h
edge_vert := Or.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => Or.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
instance : Inf G.Subgraph where
inf G₁ G₂ :=
{ verts := G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts
Adj := G₁.Adj ⊓ G₂.Adj
adj_sub := fun hab => G₁.adj_sub hab.1
edge_vert := And.imp (fun h => G₁.edge_vert h) fun h => G₂.edge_vert h
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp G₁.adj_symm G₂.adj_symm }
instance : Top G.Subgraph where
top :=
{ verts := Set.univ
Adj := G.Adj
adj_sub := id
edge_vert := @fun v _ _ => Set.mem_univ v
symm := G.symm }
instance : Bot G.Subgraph where
bot :=
{ verts := ∅
Adj := ⊥
adj_sub := False.elim
edge_vert := False.elim
symm := fun _ _ => id }
instance : SupSet G.Subgraph where
sSup s :=
{ verts := ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => ∃ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b
adj_sub := by
rintro a b ⟨G', -, hab⟩
exact G'.adj_sub hab
edge_vert := by
rintro a b ⟨G', hG', hab⟩
exact Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem hG' (G'.edge_vert hab)
symm := fun a b h => by simpa [adj_comm] using h }
instance : InfSet G.Subgraph where
sInf s :=
{ verts := ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G'
Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G'⦄, G' ∈ s → Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b
adj_sub := And.right
edge_vert := fun hab => Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem fun G' hG' => G'.edge_vert <| hab.1 hG'
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) G.adj_symm }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∨ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.sup_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sup_adj
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).Adj a b ↔ G₁.Adj a b ∧ G₂.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.inf_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.inf_adj
@[simp]
theorem top_adj : (⊤ : Subgraph G).Adj a b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.top_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.top_adj
@[simp]
theorem not_bot_adj : ¬ (⊥ : Subgraph G).Adj a b :=
not_false
#align simple_graph.subgraph.not_bot_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.not_bot_adj
@[simp]
theorem verts_sup (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∪ G₂.verts :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_sup
@[simp]
theorem verts_inf (G₁ G₂ : G.Subgraph) : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).verts = G₁.verts ∩ G₂.verts :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_inf
@[simp]
theorem verts_top : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).verts = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_top SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_top
@[simp]
theorem verts_bot : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).verts = ∅ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_bot SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_bot
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.Sup_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set G.Subgraph} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b) ∧ G.Adj a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.Inf_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sInf_adj
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.supr_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.iSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ G.Adj a b := by
simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.infi_adj SimpleGraph.Subgraph.iInf_adj
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set G.Subgraph} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G' ∈ s, Adj G' a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G', hG'⟩ := hs
exact fun h => G'.adj_sub (h _ hG')
#align simple_graph.subgraph.Inf_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.Subgraph.sInf_adj_of_nonempty
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → G.Subgraph} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _)]
simp
#align simple_graph.subgraph.infi_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.Subgraph.iInf_adj_of_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem verts_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).verts = ⋃ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_Sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_sSup
@[simp]
theorem verts_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sInf s).verts = ⋂ G' ∈ s, verts G' :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_Inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_sInf
@[simp]
theorem verts_iSup {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨆ i, f i).verts = ⋃ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_supr SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_iSup
@[simp]
theorem verts_iInf {f : ι → G.Subgraph} : (⨅ i, f i).verts = ⋂ i, (f i).verts := by simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.verts_infi SimpleGraph.Subgraph.verts_iInf
theorem verts_spanningCoe_injective :
(fun G' : Subgraph G => (G'.verts, G'.spanningCoe)).Injective := by
intro G₁ G₂ h
rw [Prod.ext_iff] at h
exact Subgraph.ext _ _ h.1 (spanningCoe_inj.1 h.2)
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
{ show DistribLattice G.Subgraph from
verts_spanningCoe_injective.distribLattice _
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun x y => x.verts ⊆ y.verts ∧ ∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w }
instance : BoundedOrder (Subgraph G) where
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top x := ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun _ _ => x.adj_sub⟩
bot_le _ := ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
-- Note that subgraphs do not form a Boolean algebra, because of `verts`.
instance : CompletelyDistribLattice G.Subgraph :=
{ Subgraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
top := ⊤
bot := ⊥
le_top := fun G' => ⟨Set.subset_univ _, fun a b => G'.adj_sub⟩
bot_le := fun G' => ⟨Set.empty_subset _, fun a b => False.elim⟩
sSup := sSup
-- Porting note: needed `apply` here to modify elaboration; previously the term itself was fine.
le_sSup := fun s G' hG' => ⟨by apply Set.subset_iUnion₂ G' hG', fun a b hab => ⟨G', hG', hab⟩⟩
sSup_le := fun s G' hG' =>
⟨Set.iUnion₂_subset fun H hH => (hG' _ hH).1, by
rintro a b ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact (hG' _ hH).2 hab⟩
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun s G' hG' => ⟨Set.iInter₂_subset G' hG', fun a b hab => hab.1 hG'⟩
le_sInf := fun s G' hG' =>
⟨Set.subset_iInter₂ fun H hH => (hG' _ hH).1, fun a b hab =>
⟨fun H hH => (hG' _ hH).2 hab, G'.adj_sub hab⟩⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => Subgraph.ext _ _ (by simpa using iInf_iSup_eq)
(by ext; simp [Classical.skolem]) }
@[simps]
instance subgraphInhabited : Inhabited (Subgraph G) := ⟨⊥⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.subgraph_inhabited SimpleGraph.Subgraph.subgraphInhabited
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sup {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊔ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∪ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_sup
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_inf {H H' : G.Subgraph} (v : V) :
(H ⊓ H').neighborSet v = H.neighborSet v ∩ H'.neighborSet v := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_inf
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_top (v : V) : (⊤ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = G.neighborSet v := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_top SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_top
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_bot (v : V) : (⊥ : G.Subgraph).neighborSet v = ∅ := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_bot SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_bot
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sSup s).neighborSet v = ⋃ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v := by
ext
simp
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_Sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_sSup
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(sInf s).neighborSet v = (⋂ G' ∈ s, neighborSet G' v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by
ext
simp
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_Inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_sInf
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨆ i, f i).neighborSet v = ⋃ i, (f i).neighborSet v := by simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_supr SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_iSup
@[simp]
theorem neighborSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) (v : V) :
(⨅ i, f i).neighborSet v = (⋂ i, (f i).neighborSet v) ∩ G.neighborSet v := by simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.neighbor_set_infi SimpleGraph.Subgraph.neighborSet_iInf
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = G.edgeSet := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_top SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_top
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_bot SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊓ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∩ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_inf
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} : (H₁ ⊔ H₂).edgeSet = H₁.edgeSet ∪ H₂.edgeSet :=
Set.ext <| Sym2.ind (by simp)
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_sup
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sSup (s : Set G.Subgraph) : (sSup s).edgeSet = ⋃ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G' := by
ext e
induction e using Sym2.ind
simp
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_Sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_sSup
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sInf (s : Set G.Subgraph) :
(sInf s).edgeSet = (⋂ G' ∈ s, edgeSet G') ∩ G.edgeSet := by
ext e
induction e using Sym2.ind
simp
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_Inf SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_sInf
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iSup (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨆ i, f i).edgeSet = ⋃ i, (f i).edgeSet := by simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_supr SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_iSup
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_iInf (f : ι → G.Subgraph) :
(⨅ i, f i).edgeSet = (⋂ i, (f i).edgeSet) ∩ G.edgeSet := by
simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_infi SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_iInf
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_top : (⊤ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = G := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_top SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe_top
@[simp]
theorem spanningCoe_bot : (⊥ : Subgraph G).spanningCoe = ⊥ := rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_bot SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe_bot
@[simps]
def _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) : G.Subgraph where
verts := Set.univ
Adj := H.Adj
adj_sub e := h e
edge_vert _ := Set.mem_univ _
symm := H.symm
#align simple_graph.to_subgraph SimpleGraph.toSubgraph
theorem support_mono {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.support ⊆ H'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h.2
#align simple_graph.subgraph.support_mono SimpleGraph.Subgraph.support_mono
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.toSubgraph.isSpanning (H : SimpleGraph V) (h : H ≤ G) :
(toSubgraph H h).IsSpanning :=
Set.mem_univ
#align simple_graph.to_subgraph.is_spanning SimpleGraph.toSubgraph.isSpanning
theorem spanningCoe_le_of_le {H H' : Subgraph G} (h : H ≤ H') : H.spanningCoe ≤ H'.spanningCoe :=
h.2
#align simple_graph.subgraph.spanning_coe_le_of_le SimpleGraph.Subgraph.spanningCoe_le_of_le
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g G where
toFun v := ↑v
invFun v := ⟨v, trivial⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.top_equiv SimpleGraph.Subgraph.topEquiv
def botEquiv : (⊥ : Subgraph G).coe ≃g (⊥ : SimpleGraph Empty) where
toFun v := v.property.elim
invFun v := v.elim
left_inv := fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h.elim
right_inv v := v.elim
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.subgraph.bot_equiv SimpleGraph.Subgraph.botEquiv
theorem edgeSet_mono {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : H₁ ≤ H₂) : H₁.edgeSet ≤ H₂.edgeSet :=
Sym2.ind h.2
#align simple_graph.subgraph.edge_set_mono SimpleGraph.Subgraph.edgeSet_mono
theorem _root_.Disjoint.edgeSet {H₁ H₂ : Subgraph G} (h : Disjoint H₁ H₂) :
Disjoint H₁.edgeSet H₂.edgeSet :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| by simpa using edgeSet_mono h.le_bot
#align disjoint.edge_set Disjoint.edgeSet
@[simps]
protected def map {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) : G'.Subgraph where
verts := f '' H.verts
Adj := Relation.Map H.Adj f f
adj_sub := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact f.map_rel (H.adj_sub h)
edge_vert := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (H.edge_vert h)
symm := by
rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨v, u, H.symm h, rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.map SimpleGraph.Subgraph.map
theorem map_monotone {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') : Monotone (Subgraph.map f) := by
intro H H' h
constructor
· intro
simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro v hv rfl
exact ⟨_, h.1 hv, rfl⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨u, v, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, h.2 ha, rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.map_monotone SimpleGraph.Subgraph.map_monotone
theorem map_sup {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') {H H' : G.Subgraph} :
(H ⊔ H').map f = H.map f ⊔ H'.map f := by
ext1
· simp only [Set.image_union, map_verts, verts_sup]
· ext
simp only [Relation.Map, map_adj, sup_adj]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, h | h, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨_, _, h, rfl, rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨a, b, h, rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, b, h, rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, Or.inl h, rfl, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, Or.inr h, rfl, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.map_sup SimpleGraph.Subgraph.map_sup
@[simps]
protected def comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G'.Subgraph) : G.Subgraph where
verts := f ⁻¹' H.verts
Adj u v := G.Adj u v ∧ H.Adj (f u) (f v)
adj_sub h := h.1
edge_vert h := Set.mem_preimage.1 (H.edge_vert h.2)
symm _ _ h := ⟨G.symm h.1, H.symm h.2⟩
#align simple_graph.subgraph.comap SimpleGraph.Subgraph.comap
theorem comap_monotone {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') : Monotone (Subgraph.comap f) := by
intro H H' h
constructor
· intro
simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
apply h.1
· intro v w
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [comap_adj, and_imp, true_and_iff]
intro
apply h.2
#align simple_graph.subgraph.comap_monotone SimpleGraph.Subgraph.comap_monotone
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Subgraph.lean | 698 | 710 | theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {G' : SimpleGraph W} (f : G →g G') (H : G.Subgraph) (H' : G'.Subgraph) :
H.map f ≤ H' ↔ H ≤ H'.comap f := by |
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨fun v hv ↦ ?_, fun v w hvw ↦ ?_⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨fun v ↦ ?_, fun v w ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· simp only [comap_verts, Set.mem_preimage]
exact h.1 ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
· simp only [H.adj_sub hvw, comap_adj, true_and_iff]
exact h.2 ⟨v, w, hvw, rfl, rfl⟩
· simp only [map_verts, Set.mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro w hw rfl
exact h.1 hw
· simp only [Relation.Map, map_adj, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
rintro u u' hu rfl rfl
exact (h.2 hu).2
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.Geometry.RingedSpace.LocallyRingedSpace
#align_import algebraic_geometry.open_immersion.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"533f62f4dd62a5aad24a04326e6e787c8f7e98b1"
-- Porting note: due to `PresheafedSpace`, `SheafedSpace` and `LocallyRingedSpace`
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory Opposite
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
universe v v₁ v₂ u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
class PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
base_open : OpenEmbedding f.base
c_iso : ∀ U : Opens X, IsIso (f.c.app (op (base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U)))
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
abbrev SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : SheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f
#align algebraic_geometry.SheafedSpace.is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
abbrev LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion {X Y : LocallyRingedSpace} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop :=
SheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion f.1
#align algebraic_geometry.LocallyRingedSpace.is_open_immersion AlgebraicGeometry.LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
namespace PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
open PresheafedSpace
local notation "IsOpenImmersion" => PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion
attribute [instance] IsOpenImmersion.c_iso
section
variable {X Y : PresheafedSpace C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (H : IsOpenImmersion f)
abbrev openFunctor :=
H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.open_functor AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.openFunctor
@[simps! hom_c_app]
noncomputable def isoRestrict : X ≅ Y.restrict H.base_open :=
PresheafedSpace.isoOfComponents (Iso.refl _) <| by
symm
fapply NatIso.ofComponents
· intro U
refine asIso (f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj (unop U)))) ≪≫ X.presheaf.mapIso (eqToIso ?_)
induction U using Opposite.rec' with | h U => ?_
cases U
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor, Functor.op, Opens.map]
congr 2
erw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]
rfl
· intro U V i
simp only [CategoryTheory.eqToIso.hom, TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj_map, Category.assoc,
Functor.op_map, Iso.trans_hom, asIso_hom, Functor.mapIso_hom, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.iso_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict
@[simp]
theorem isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict : H.isoRestrict.hom ≫ Y.ofRestrict _ = f := by
-- Porting note: `ext` did not pick up `NatTrans.ext`
refine PresheafedSpace.Hom.ext _ _ rfl <| NatTrans.ext _ _ <| funext fun x => ?_
simp only [isoRestrict_hom_c_app, NatTrans.comp_app, eqToHom_refl,
ofRestrict_c_app, Category.assoc, whiskerRight_id']
erw [Category.comp_id, comp_c_app, f.c.naturality_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
trans f.c.app x ≫ X.presheaf.map (𝟙 _)
· congr 1
· erw [X.presheaf.map_id, Category.comp_id]
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.iso_restrict_hom_of_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict
@[simp]
theorem isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict : H.isoRestrict.inv ≫ f = Y.ofRestrict _ := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.iso_restrict_inv_of_restrict AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.isoRestrict_inv_ofRestrict
instance mono [H : IsOpenImmersion f] : Mono f := by
rw [← H.isoRestrict_hom_ofRestrict]; apply mono_comp
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.mono AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.mono
instance comp {Z : PresheafedSpace C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [hf : IsOpenImmersion f] (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[hg : IsOpenImmersion g] : IsOpenImmersion (f ≫ g) where
base_open := hg.base_open.comp hf.base_open
c_iso U := by
generalize_proofs h
dsimp only [AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.comp_c_app, unop_op, Functor.op, comp_base,
TopCat.Presheaf.pushforwardObj_obj, Opens.map_comp_obj]
-- Porting note: was `apply (config := { instances := False }) ...`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2273
have : IsIso (g.c.app (op <| (h.functor).obj U)) := by
have : h.functor.obj U = hg.openFunctor.obj (hf.openFunctor.obj U) := by
ext1
dsimp only [IsOpenMap.functor_obj_coe]
-- Porting note: slightly more hand holding here: `g ∘ f` and `fun x => g (f x)`
erw [comp_base, coe_comp, show g.base ∘ f.base = fun x => g.base (f.base x) from rfl,
← Set.image_image] -- now `erw` after #13170
rw [this]
infer_instance
have : IsIso (f.c.app (op <| (Opens.map g.base).obj ((IsOpenMap.functor h).obj U))) := by
have : (Opens.map g.base).obj (h.functor.obj U) = hf.openFunctor.obj U := by
ext1
dsimp only [Opens.map_coe, IsOpenMap.functor_obj_coe, comp_base]
-- Porting note: slightly more hand holding here: `g ∘ f` and `fun x => g (f x)`
erw [coe_comp, show g.base ∘ f.base = fun x => g.base (f.base x) from rfl,
← Set.image_image g.base f.base, Set.preimage_image_eq _ hg.base_open.inj]
-- now `erw` after #13170
rw [this]
infer_instance
apply IsIso.comp_isIso
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.comp AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp
noncomputable def invApp (U : Opens X) :
X.presheaf.obj (op U) ⟶ Y.presheaf.obj (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)) :=
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by
-- Porting note: was just `simp [opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- I think this is because `Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj` can't see through a
-- structure
congr; ext
dsimp [openFunctor, IsOpenMap.functor]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj])) ≫
inv (f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)))
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.inv_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_naturality {U V : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ} (i : U ⟶ V) :
X.presheaf.map i ≫ H.invApp (unop V) =
H.invApp (unop U) ≫ Y.presheaf.map (H.openFunctor.op.map i) := by
simp only [invApp, ← Category.assoc]
rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq]
-- Porting note: `simp` can't pick up `f.c.naturality`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
simp only [Category.assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [f.c.naturality]
simp only [IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc, ← X.presheaf.map_comp]
erw [← X.presheaf.map_comp]
congr 1
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.inv_naturality AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_naturality
instance (U : Opens X) : IsIso (H.invApp U) := by delta invApp; infer_instance
theorem inv_invApp (U : Opens X) :
inv (H.invApp U) =
f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)) ≫
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by
-- Porting note: was just `simp [opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- I think this is because `Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj` can't see through a
-- structure
apply congr_arg (op ·); ext
dsimp [openFunctor, IsOpenMap.functor]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj])) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (H.invApp U), IsIso.hom_inv_id]
delta invApp
simp [← Functor.map_comp]
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.inv_inv_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.inv_invApp
@[simp, reassoc, elementwise]
theorem invApp_app (U : Opens X) :
H.invApp U ≫ f.c.app (op (H.openFunctor.obj U)) =
X.presheaf.map (eqToHom (by
-- Porting note: was just `simp [opens.map, Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj]`
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5026
-- I think this is because `Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj` can't see through a
-- structure
apply congr_arg (op ·); ext
dsimp [openFunctor, IsOpenMap.functor]
rw [Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj])) := by
rw [invApp, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id]
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.inv_app_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.invApp_app
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem app_invApp (U : Opens Y) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
((homOfLE (Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1)).op :
op U ⟶ op (H.openFunctor.obj ((Opens.map f.base).obj U))) := by
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
#align algebraic_geometry.PresheafedSpace.is_open_immersion.app_inv_app AlgebraicGeometry.PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.app_invApp
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/Geometry/RingedSpace/OpenImmersion.lean | 257 | 267 | theorem app_inv_app' (U : Opens Y) (hU : (U : Set Y) ⊆ Set.range f.base) :
f.c.app (op U) ≫ H.invApp ((Opens.map f.base).obj U) =
Y.presheaf.map
(eqToHom
(by
apply le_antisymm
· exact Set.image_preimage_subset f.base U.1
· rw [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe]
refine LE.le.trans_eq ?_ (@Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range _ _ f.base U.1).symm
exact Set.subset_inter_iff.mpr ⟨fun _ h => h, hU⟩)).op := by |
erw [← Category.assoc]; rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, f.c.naturality]; congr
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import data.finsupp.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"842328d9df7e96fd90fc424e115679c15fb23a71"
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
support : Finset α
toFun : α → M
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
#align finsupp Finsupp
#align finsupp.support Finsupp.support
#align finsupp.to_fun Finsupp.toFun
#align finsupp.mem_support_to_fun Finsupp.mem_support_toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
#align finsupp.fun_like Finsupp.instFunLike
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →₀ M) fun _ => α → M :=
inferInstance
#align finsupp.has_coe_to_fun Finsupp.instCoeFun
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align finsupp.ext Finsupp.ext
#align finsupp.ext_iff DFunLike.ext_iff
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
#align finsupp.coe_fn_inj DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align finsupp.coe_fn_injective DFunLike.coe_injective
#align finsupp.congr_fun DFunLike.congr_fun
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.coe_mk Finsupp.coe_mk
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
#align finsupp.has_zero Finsupp.instZero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
#align finsupp.coe_zero Finsupp.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.zero_apply Finsupp.zero_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finsupp.support_zero Finsupp.support_zero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
#align finsupp.inhabited Finsupp.instInhabited
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
#align finsupp.mem_support_iff Finsupp.mem_support_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
#align finsupp.fun_support_eq Finsupp.fun_support_eq
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
#align finsupp.not_mem_support_iff Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
#align finsupp.coe_eq_zero Finsupp.coe_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 188 | 195 | theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by | rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Data.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Combination
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.independent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
open scoped Affine
section AffineIndependent
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*}
def AffineIndependent (p : ι → P) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0
#align affine_independent AffineIndependent
theorem affineIndependent_def (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 → s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align affine_independent_def affineIndependent_def
theorem affineIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (p : ι → P) : AffineIndependent k p :=
fun _ _ h _ i hi => Fintype.eq_of_subsingleton_of_sum_eq h i hi
#align affine_independent_of_subsingleton affineIndependent_of_subsingleton
theorem affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ w : ι → k, ∑ i, w i = 0 → Finset.univ.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) → ∀ i, w i = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h w hw hs i => h Finset.univ w hw hs i (Finset.mem_univ _)
· intro h s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset _ _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hs
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s)] at hw
replace h := h ((↑s : Set ι).indicator w) hw hs i
simpa [hi] using h
#align affine_independent_iff_of_fintype affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype
theorem affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub (p : ι → P) (i1 : ι) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ LinearIndependent k fun i : { x // x ≠ i1 } => (p i -ᵥ p i1 : V) := by
classical
constructor
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
set f : ι → k := fun x => if hx : x = i1 then -∑ y ∈ s, g y else g ⟨x, hx⟩ with hfdef
let s2 : Finset ι := insert i1 (s.map (Embedding.subtype _))
have hfg : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, g x = f x := by
intro x
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
erw [dif_neg x.property, Subtype.coe_eta]
rw [hfg]
have hf : ∑ ι ∈ s2, f ι = 0 := by
rw [Finset.sum_insert
(Finset.not_mem_map_subtype_of_not_property s (Classical.not_not.2 rfl)),
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => (hfg x).symm]
rw [hfdef]
dsimp only
rw [dif_pos rfl]
exact neg_add_self _
have hs2 : s2.weightedVSub p f = (0 : V) := by
set f2 : ι → V := fun x => f x • (p x -ᵥ p i1) with hf2def
set g2 : { x // x ≠ i1 } → V := fun x => g x • (p x -ᵥ p i1)
have hf2g2 : ∀ x : { x // x ≠ i1 }, f2 x = g2 x := by
simp only [g2, hf2def]
refine fun x => ?_
rw [hfg]
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s2 f p hf (p i1),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply,
Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding fun x _ => hf2g2 x]
exact hg
exact h s2 f hf hs2 i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_map.2 ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
· intro h
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at h
intro s w hw hs i hi
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p hw (p i1), ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase w p i1, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply] at hs
let f : ι → V := fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i1)
have hs2 : (∑ i ∈ (s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1, f i) = 0 := by
rw [← hs]
convert Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem f fun x => Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
have h2 := h ((s.erase i1).subtype fun i => i ≠ i1) (fun x => w x) hs2
simp_rw [Finset.mem_subtype] at h2
have h2b : ∀ i ∈ s, i ≠ i1 → w i = 0 := fun i his hi =>
h2 ⟨i, hi⟩ (Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hi his)
exact Finset.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw h2b i hi
#align affine_independent_iff_linear_independent_vsub affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub
theorem affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub {s : Set P} {p₁ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) :
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : s → P) ↔
LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → V) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k (fun p => p : s → P) ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩]
constructor
· intro h
have hv : ∀ v : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}), (v : V) +ᵥ p₁ ∈ s \ {p₁} := fun v =>
(vsub_left_injective p₁).mem_set_image.1 ((vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm ▸ v.property)
let f : (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) → { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } := fun x =>
⟨⟨(x : V) +ᵥ p₁, Set.mem_of_mem_diff (hv x)⟩, fun hx =>
Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff (hv x) (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (vadd_right_cancel p₁ (Subtype.ext_iff.1 (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
ext v
exact (vadd_vsub (v : V) p₁).symm
· intro h
let f : { x : s // x ≠ ⟨p₁, hp₁⟩ } → (fun p : P => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (s \ {p₁}) := fun x =>
⟨((x : s) : P) -ᵥ p₁, ⟨x, ⟨⟨(x : s).property, fun hx => x.property (Subtype.ext hx)⟩, rfl⟩⟩⟩
convert h.comp f fun x1 x2 hx =>
Subtype.ext (Subtype.ext (vsub_left_cancel (Subtype.ext_iff.1 hx)))
#align affine_independent_set_iff_linear_independent_vsub affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub
theorem linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton {s : Set V}
(hs : ∀ v ∈ s, v ≠ (0 : V)) (p₁ : P) : LinearIndependent k (fun v => v : s → V) ↔
AffineIndependent k (fun p => p : ({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s : Set P) → P) := by
rw [affineIndependent_set_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k
(Set.mem_union_left _ (Set.mem_singleton p₁))]
have h : (fun p => (p -ᵥ p₁ : V)) '' (({p₁} ∪ (fun v => v +ᵥ p₁) '' s) \ {p₁}) = s := by
simp_rw [Set.union_diff_left, Set.image_diff (vsub_left_injective p₁), Set.image_image,
Set.image_singleton, vsub_self, vadd_vsub, Set.image_id']
exact Set.diff_singleton_eq_self fun h => hs 0 h rfl
rw [h]
#align linear_independent_set_iff_affine_independent_vadd_union_singleton linearIndependent_set_iff_affineIndependent_vadd_union_singleton
theorem affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s1 s2 : Finset ι) (w1 w2 : ι → k),
∑ i ∈ s1, w1 i = 1 →
∑ i ∈ s2, w2 i = 1 →
s1.affineCombination k p w1 = s2.affineCombination k p w2 →
Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 = Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 := by
classical
constructor
· intro ha s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 heq
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s1 ∪ s2
· rw [← sub_eq_zero]
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w1 (s1.subset_union_left (s₂:=s2))] at hw1
rw [← Finset.sum_indicator_subset w2 (s1.subset_union_right)] at hw2
have hws : (∑ i ∈ s1 ∪ s2, (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) i) = 0 := by
simp [hw1, hw2]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (s1.subset_union_left (s₂:=s2)),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p s1.subset_union_right,
← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, Finset.affineCombination_vsub] at heq
exact ha (s1 ∪ s2) (Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 - Set.indicator (↑s2) w2) hws heq i hi
· rw [← Finset.mem_coe, Finset.coe_union] at hi
have h₁ : Set.indicator (↑s1) w1 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_left _ i ↑s1 ↑s2) hi) h
have h₂ : Set.indicator (↑s2) w2 i = 0 := by
simp only [Set.indicator, Finset.mem_coe, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro h
by_contra
exact (mt (@Set.mem_union_right _ i ↑s2 ↑s1) hi) h
simp [h₁, h₂]
· intro ha s w hw hs i0 hi0
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i0 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
rw [Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi0]
simp only [Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, const_apply]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i0 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi0 (Function.update_same _ _ _)
fun _ _ hne => Function.update_noteq hne _ _
let w2 := w + w1
have hw2 : ∑ i ∈ s, w2 i = 1 := by
simp_all only [w2, Pi.add_apply, Finset.sum_add_distrib, zero_add]
have hw2s : s.affineCombination k p w2 = p i0 := by
simp_all only [w2, ← Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, zero_vadd]
replace ha := ha s s w2 w1 hw2 hw1 (hw1s.symm ▸ hw2s)
have hws : w2 i0 - w1 i0 = 0 := by
rw [← Finset.mem_coe] at hi0
rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w2, ← Set.indicator_of_mem hi0 w1, ha, sub_self]
simpa [w2] using hws
#align affine_independent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affine_combination_eq affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq
theorem affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
AffineIndependent k p ↔ ∀ w1 w2 : ι → k, ∑ i, w1 i = 1 → ∑ i, w2 i = 1 →
Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w1 = Finset.univ.affineCombination k p w2 → w1 = w2 := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq]
constructor
· intro h w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
simpa only [Set.indicator_univ, Finset.coe_univ] using h _ _ w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
· intro h s1 s2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 hweq
have hw1' : (∑ i, (s1 : Set ι).indicator w1 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s1)]
have hw2' : (∑ i, (s2 : Set ι).indicator w2 i) = 1 := by
rwa [Finset.sum_indicator_subset _ (Finset.subset_univ s2)]
rw [Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w1 p (Finset.subset_univ s1),
Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset w2 p (Finset.subset_univ s2)] at hweq
exact h _ _ hw1' hw2' hweq
#align affine_independent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affine_combination_eq affineIndependent_iff_eq_of_fintype_affineCombination_eq
variable {k}
theorem AffineIndependent.units_lineMap {p : ι → P} (hp : AffineIndependent k p) (j : ι)
(w : ι → Units k) : AffineIndependent k fun i => AffineMap.lineMap (p j) (p i) (w i : k) := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub k _ j] at hp ⊢
simp only [AffineMap.lineMap_vsub_left, AffineMap.coe_const, AffineMap.lineMap_same, const_apply]
exact hp.units_smul fun i => w i
#align affine_independent.units_line_map AffineIndependent.units_lineMap
theorem AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s₁, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s₂, w₂ i = 1) (h : s₁.affineCombination k p w₁ = s₂.affineCombination k p w₂) :
Set.indicator (↑s₁) w₁ = Set.indicator (↑s₂) w₂ :=
(affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq k p).1 ha s₁ s₂ w₁ w₂ hw₁ hw₂ h
#align affine_independent.indicator_eq_of_affine_combination_eq AffineIndependent.indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq
protected theorem AffineIndependent.injective [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : Function.Injective p := by
intro i j hij
rw [affineIndependent_iff_linearIndependent_vsub _ _ j] at ha
by_contra hij'
refine ha.ne_zero ⟨i, hij'⟩ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.mpr ?_)
simp_all only [ne_eq]
#align affine_independent.injective AffineIndependent.injective
theorem AffineIndependent.comp_embedding {ι2 : Type*} (f : ι2 ↪ ι) {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) : AffineIndependent k (p ∘ f) := by
classical
intro fs w hw hs i0 hi0
let fs' := fs.map f
let w' i := if h : ∃ i2, f i2 = i then w h.choose else 0
have hw' : ∀ i2 : ι2, w' (f i2) = w i2 := by
intro i2
have h : ∃ i : ι2, f i = f i2 := ⟨i2, rfl⟩
have hs : h.choose = i2 := f.injective h.choose_spec
simp_rw [w', dif_pos h, hs]
have hw's : ∑ i ∈ fs', w' i = 0 := by
rw [← hw, Finset.sum_map]
simp [hw']
have hs' : fs'.weightedVSub p w' = (0 : V) := by
rw [← hs, Finset.weightedVSub_map]
congr with i
simp_all only [comp_apply, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, exists_eq, dite_true]
rw [← ha fs' w' hw's hs' (f i0) ((Finset.mem_map' _).2 hi0), hw']
#align affine_independent.comp_embedding AffineIndependent.comp_embedding
protected theorem AffineIndependent.subtype {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) (s : Set ι) :
AffineIndependent k fun i : s => p i :=
ha.comp_embedding (Embedding.subtype _)
#align affine_independent.subtype AffineIndependent.subtype
protected theorem AffineIndependent.range {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent k p) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P) := by
let f : Set.range p → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let fe : Set.range p ↪ ι := ⟨f, fun x₁ x₂ he => Subtype.ext (hf x₁ ▸ hf x₂ ▸ he ▸ rfl)⟩
convert ha.comp_embedding fe
ext
simp [fe, hf]
#align affine_independent.range AffineIndependent.range
theorem affineIndependent_equiv {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') {p : ι' → P} :
AffineIndependent k (p ∘ e) ↔ AffineIndependent k p := by
refine ⟨?_, AffineIndependent.comp_embedding e.toEmbedding⟩
intro h
have : p = p ∘ e ∘ e.symm.toEmbedding := by
ext
simp
rw [this]
exact h.comp_embedding e.symm.toEmbedding
#align affine_independent_equiv affineIndependent_equiv
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mono {s t : Set P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : t → P)) (hs : s ⊆ t) :
AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : s → P) :=
ha.comp_embedding (s.embeddingOfSubset t hs)
#align affine_independent.mono AffineIndependent.mono
theorem AffineIndependent.of_set_of_injective {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k (fun x => x : Set.range p → P)) (hi : Function.Injective p) :
AffineIndependent k p :=
ha.comp_embedding
(⟨fun i => ⟨p i, Set.mem_range_self _⟩, fun _ _ h => hi (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.1 h)⟩ :
ι ↪ Set.range p)
#align affine_independent.of_set_of_injective AffineIndependent.of_set_of_injective
theorem AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} {p0 : P} (hp0s1 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s1))
(hp0s2 : p0 ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s2)) : ∃ i : ι, i ∈ s1 ∩ s2 := by
rw [Set.image_eq_range] at hp0s1 hp0s2
rw [mem_affineSpan_iff_eq_affineCombination, ←
Finset.eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype] at hp0s1 hp0s2
rcases hp0s1 with ⟨fs1, hfs1, w1, hw1, hp0s1⟩
rcases hp0s2 with ⟨fs2, hfs2, w2, hw2, hp0s2⟩
rw [affineIndependent_iff_indicator_eq_of_affineCombination_eq] at ha
replace ha := ha fs1 fs2 w1 w2 hw1 hw2 (hp0s1 ▸ hp0s2)
have hnz : ∑ i ∈ fs1, w1 i ≠ 0 := hw1.symm ▸ one_ne_zero
rcases Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero hnz with ⟨i, hifs1, hinz⟩
simp_rw [← Set.indicator_of_mem (Finset.mem_coe.2 hifs1) w1, ha] at hinz
use i, hfs1 hifs1
exact hfs2 (Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero hinz)
#align affine_independent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affine_span AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan
theorem AffineIndependent.affineSpan_disjoint_of_disjoint [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) {s1 s2 : Set ι} (hd : Disjoint s1 s2) :
Disjoint (affineSpan k (p '' s1) : Set P) (affineSpan k (p '' s2)) := by
refine Set.disjoint_left.2 fun p0 hp0s1 hp0s2 => ?_
cases' ha.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan hp0s1 hp0s2 with i hi
exact Set.disjoint_iff.1 hd hi
#align affine_independent.affine_span_disjoint_of_disjoint AffineIndependent.affineSpan_disjoint_of_disjoint
@[simp]
protected theorem AffineIndependent.mem_affineSpan_iff [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (i : ι) (s : Set ι) : p i ∈ affineSpan k (p '' s) ↔ i ∈ s := by
constructor
· intro hs
have h :=
AffineIndependent.exists_mem_inter_of_exists_mem_inter_affineSpan ha hs
(mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _)))
rwa [← Set.nonempty_def, Set.inter_singleton_nonempty] at h
· exact fun h => mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_image_of_mem p h)
#align affine_independent.mem_affine_span_iff AffineIndependent.mem_affineSpan_iff
theorem AffineIndependent.not_mem_affineSpan_diff [Nontrivial k] {p : ι → P}
(ha : AffineIndependent k p) (i : ι) (s : Set ι) : p i ∉ affineSpan k (p '' (s \ {i})) := by
simp [ha]
#align affine_independent.not_mem_affine_span_diff AffineIndependent.not_mem_affineSpan_diff
theorem exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind {t : Finset V}
(h : ¬AffineIndependent k ((↑) : t → V)) :
∃ f : V → k, ∑ e ∈ t, f e • e = 0 ∧ ∑ e ∈ t, f e = 0 ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, f x ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [affineIndependent_iff_of_fintype] at h
simp only [exists_prop, not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨w, hw, hwt, i, hi⟩ := h
simp only [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ w ((↑) : t → V) hw 0,
vsub_eq_sub, Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sub_zero] at hwt
let f : ∀ x : V, x ∈ t → k := fun x hx => w ⟨x, hx⟩
refine ⟨fun x => if hx : x ∈ t then f x hx else (0 : k), ?_, ?_, by use i; simp [hi]⟩
on_goal 1 =>
suffices (∑ e ∈ t, dite (e ∈ t) (fun hx => f e hx • e) fun _ => 0) = 0 by
convert this
rename V => x
by_cases hx : x ∈ t <;> simp [hx]
all_goals
simp only [Finset.sum_dite_of_true fun _ h => h, Finset.mk_coe, hwt, hw]
#align exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind exists_nontrivial_relation_sum_zero_of_not_affine_ind
variable {s : Finset ι} {w w₁ w₂ : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
theorem affineIndependent_iff {ι} {p : ι → V} :
AffineIndependent k p ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), s.sum w = 0 → ∑ e ∈ s, w e • p e = 0 → ∀ e ∈ s, w e = 0 :=
forall₃_congr fun s w hw => by simp [s.weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination hw]
#align affine_independent_iff affineIndependent_iff
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero (hp : AffineIndependent k p)
(hw₀ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i = 0) : ∀ i ∈ s, w i = 0 :=
affineIndependent_iff.1 hp _ _ hw₀ hw₁
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_of_sum_eq_sum (hp : AffineIndependent k p)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i) (hwp : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i • p i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i • p i) :
∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i := by
refine fun i hi ↦ sub_eq_zero.1 (hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero (w := w₁ - w₂) ?_ ?_ _ hi) <;>
simpa [sub_mul, sub_smul, sub_eq_zero]
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype {s : Finset V}
(hp : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) {w : V → k} (hw₀ : ∑ x ∈ s, w x = 0)
(hw₁ : ∑ x ∈ s, w x • x = 0) : ∀ x ∈ s, w x = 0 := by
rw [← sum_attach] at hw₀ hw₁
exact fun x hx ↦ hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero hw₀ hw₁ ⟨x, hx⟩ (mem_univ _)
lemma AffineIndependent.eq_of_sum_eq_sum_subtype {s : Finset V}
(hp : AffineIndependent k ((↑) : s → V)) {w₁ w₂ : V → k} (hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i)
(hwp : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i • i = ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i • i) : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i := by
refine fun i hi => sub_eq_zero.1 (hp.eq_zero_of_sum_eq_zero_subtype (w := w₁ - w₂) ?_ ?_ _ hi) <;>
simpa [sub_mul, sub_smul, sub_eq_zero]
theorem weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p) {w w₁ w₂ : ι → k}
{s : Finset ι} (hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) :
s.weightedVSub p w ∈
vectorSpan k ({s.affineCombination k p w₁, s.affineCombination k p w₂} : Set P) ↔
∃ r : k, ∀ i ∈ s, w i = r * (w₁ i - w₂ i) := by
rw [mem_vectorSpan_pair]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
refine ⟨r, fun i hi => ?_⟩
rw [s.affineCombination_vsub, ← s.weightedVSub_const_smul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub] at hr
have hw' : (∑ j ∈ s, (r • (w₁ - w₂) - w) j) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Pi.sub_apply, smul_sub, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ←
Finset.smul_sum, hw, hw₁, hw₂, sub_self]
have hr' := h s _ hw' hr i hi
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← smul_eq_mul]
exact hr'
· rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
refine ⟨r, ?_⟩
let w' i := r * (w₁ i - w₂ i)
change ∀ i ∈ s, w i = w' i at hr
rw [s.weightedVSub_congr hr fun _ _ => rfl, s.affineCombination_vsub, ←
s.weightedVSub_const_smul]
congr
#align weighted_vsub_mem_vector_span_pair weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Independent.lean | 550 | 560 | theorem affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair {p : ι → P} (h : AffineIndependent k p)
{w w₁ w₂ : ι → k} {s : Finset ι} (_ : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1)
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k p w ∈ line[k, s.affineCombination k p w₁, s.affineCombination k p w₂] ↔
∃ r : k, ∀ i ∈ s, w i = r * (w₂ i - w₁ i) + w₁ i := by |
rw [← vsub_vadd (s.affineCombination k p w) (s.affineCombination k p w₁),
AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_iff_mem_direction _ (left_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _),
direction_affineSpan, s.affineCombination_vsub, Set.pair_comm,
weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan_pair h _ hw₂ hw₁]
· simp only [Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
· simp_all only [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, sub_self]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.