Context stringlengths 57 6.04k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 1.49k | end int64 18 1.5k | theorem stringlengths 25 1.55k | proof stringlengths 5 7.36k | num_lines int64 1 150 | complexity_score float64 2.72 139,370,958,066,637,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000B | diff_level int64 0 2 | file_diff_level float64 0 2 | theorem_same_file int64 1 32 | rank_file int64 0 2.51k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
#align_import category_theory.sites.plus from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
namespace CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open Opposite
universe w v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {D : Type w} [Category.{max v u} D]
noncomputable section
variable [∀ (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)]
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D)
@[simps]
def diagram (X : C) : (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj S := multiequalizer (S.unop.index P)
map {S _} f :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun I => Multiequalizer.ι (S.unop.index P) (I.map f.unop)) fun I =>
Multiequalizer.condition (S.unop.index P) (I.map f.unop)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagram
@[simps]
def diagramPullback {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : J.diagram P Y ⟶ (J.pullback f).op ⋙ J.diagram P X where
app S :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun I => Multiequalizer.ι (S.unop.index P) I.base) fun I =>
Multiequalizer.condition (S.unop.index P) I.base
naturality S T f := Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun I => by dsimp; simp; rfl)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_pullback CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramPullback
@[simps]
def diagramNatTrans {P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (X : C) : J.diagram P X ⟶ J.diagram Q X where
app W :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun i => Multiequalizer.ι _ _ ≫ η.app _) (fun i => by
dsimp only
erw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← η.naturality, ← η.naturality,
Multiequalizer.condition_assoc]
rfl)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_nat_trans CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramNatTrans
@[simp]
theorem diagramNatTrans_id (X : C) (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
J.diagramNatTrans (𝟙 P) X = 𝟙 (J.diagram P X) := by
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
dsimp
simp only [limit.lift_π, Multifork.ofι_pt, Multifork.ofι_π_app, Category.id_comp]
erw [Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_nat_trans_id CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramNatTrans_id
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Plus.lean | 81 | 86 | theorem diagramNatTrans_zero [Preadditive D] (X : C) (P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
J.diagramNatTrans (0 : P ⟶ Q) X = 0 := by |
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
dsimp
rw [zero_comp, Multiequalizer.lift_ι, comp_zero]
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,407 |
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
#align_import category_theory.sites.plus from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
namespace CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open Opposite
universe w v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
variable {D : Type w} [Category.{max v u} D]
noncomputable section
variable [∀ (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)]
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D)
@[simps]
def diagram (X : C) : (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ ⥤ D where
obj S := multiequalizer (S.unop.index P)
map {S _} f :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun I => Multiequalizer.ι (S.unop.index P) (I.map f.unop)) fun I =>
Multiequalizer.condition (S.unop.index P) (I.map f.unop)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagram
@[simps]
def diagramPullback {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : J.diagram P Y ⟶ (J.pullback f).op ⋙ J.diagram P X where
app S :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun I => Multiequalizer.ι (S.unop.index P) I.base) fun I =>
Multiequalizer.condition (S.unop.index P) I.base
naturality S T f := Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun I => by dsimp; simp; rfl)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_pullback CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramPullback
@[simps]
def diagramNatTrans {P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (X : C) : J.diagram P X ⟶ J.diagram Q X where
app W :=
Multiequalizer.lift _ _ (fun i => Multiequalizer.ι _ _ ≫ η.app _) (fun i => by
dsimp only
erw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← η.naturality, ← η.naturality,
Multiequalizer.condition_assoc]
rfl)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_nat_trans CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramNatTrans
@[simp]
theorem diagramNatTrans_id (X : C) (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
J.diagramNatTrans (𝟙 P) X = 𝟙 (J.diagram P X) := by
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
dsimp
simp only [limit.lift_π, Multifork.ofι_pt, Multifork.ofι_π_app, Category.id_comp]
erw [Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_nat_trans_id CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramNatTrans_id
@[simp]
theorem diagramNatTrans_zero [Preadditive D] (X : C) (P Q : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
J.diagramNatTrans (0 : P ⟶ Q) X = 0 := by
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
dsimp
rw [zero_comp, Multiequalizer.lift_ι, comp_zero]
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.diagram_nat_trans_zero CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.diagramNatTrans_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Plus.lean | 90 | 95 | theorem diagramNatTrans_comp {P Q R : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (η : P ⟶ Q) (γ : Q ⟶ R) (X : C) :
J.diagramNatTrans (η ≫ γ) X = J.diagramNatTrans η X ≫ J.diagramNatTrans γ X := by |
ext : 2
refine Multiequalizer.hom_ext _ _ _ (fun i => ?_)
dsimp
simp
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,407 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b2ff9a3d7a15fd5b0f060b135421d6a89a999c2f"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 40 | 54 | theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by |
refine ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable'
| 12 | 162,754.791419 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,408 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b2ff9a3d7a15fd5b0f060b135421d6a89a999c2f"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable'
#align measure_theory.rn_deriv_ae_eq_condexp MeasureTheory.rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp
-- TODO: the following couple of lemmas should be generalized and proved using Jensen's inequality
-- for the conditional expectation (not in mathlib yet) .
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 59 | 89 | theorem snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm (f : α → ℝ) : snorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm f 1 μ := by |
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hsig : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hsig, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
calc
snorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm (μ[(|f|)|m]) 1 μ := by
refine snorm_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [condexp_mono hf hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, f x ≤ |f x|)),
EventuallyLE.trans (condexp_neg f).symm.le
(condexp_mono hf.neg hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => neg_le_abs (f x): ∀ x, -f x ≤ |f x|)))] with x hx₁ hx₂
exact abs_le_abs hx₁ hx₂
_ = snorm f 1 μ := by
rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ←
ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal (ne_of_lt integrable_condexp.2) (ne_of_lt hf.2), ←
integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
(stronglyMeasurable_condexp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.1]
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw [← integral_condexp hm hf.abs]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[(|f|)|m] := by
rw [← condexp_zero]
exact condexp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => abs_nonneg (f x) : ∀ x, 0 ≤ |f x|))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
exact abs_eq_self.2 hx
| 30 | 10,686,474,581,524.463 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,408 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b2ff9a3d7a15fd5b0f060b135421d6a89a999c2f"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable'
#align measure_theory.rn_deriv_ae_eq_condexp MeasureTheory.rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp
-- TODO: the following couple of lemmas should be generalized and proved using Jensen's inequality
-- for the conditional expectation (not in mathlib yet) .
theorem snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm (f : α → ℝ) : snorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm f 1 μ := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hsig : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hsig, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
calc
snorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm (μ[(|f|)|m]) 1 μ := by
refine snorm_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [condexp_mono hf hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, f x ≤ |f x|)),
EventuallyLE.trans (condexp_neg f).symm.le
(condexp_mono hf.neg hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => neg_le_abs (f x): ∀ x, -f x ≤ |f x|)))] with x hx₁ hx₂
exact abs_le_abs hx₁ hx₂
_ = snorm f 1 μ := by
rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ←
ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal (ne_of_lt integrable_condexp.2) (ne_of_lt hf.2), ←
integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
(stronglyMeasurable_condexp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.1]
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw [← integral_condexp hm hf.abs]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[(|f|)|m] := by
rw [← condexp_zero]
exact condexp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => abs_nonneg (f x) : ∀ x, 0 ≤ |f x|))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
exact abs_eq_self.2 hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm MeasureTheory.snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 92 | 113 | theorem integral_abs_condexp_le (f : α → ℝ) : ∫ x, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, |f x| ∂μ := by |
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap
· simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero]
positivity
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
swap
· simp only [condexp_undef hfint, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_zero]
positivity
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal] <;> simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
exact snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm _
· exact integrable_condexp.2.ne
· exact hfint.2.ne
· filter_upwards with x using abs_nonneg _
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact hfint.1.norm
· filter_upwards with x using abs_nonneg _
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact (stronglyMeasurable_condexp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable.norm
| 21 | 1,318,815,734.483215 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,408 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b2ff9a3d7a15fd5b0f060b135421d6a89a999c2f"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable'
#align measure_theory.rn_deriv_ae_eq_condexp MeasureTheory.rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp
-- TODO: the following couple of lemmas should be generalized and proved using Jensen's inequality
-- for the conditional expectation (not in mathlib yet) .
theorem snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm (f : α → ℝ) : snorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm f 1 μ := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
by_cases hsig : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hsig, snorm_zero]; exact zero_le _
calc
snorm (μ[f|m]) 1 μ ≤ snorm (μ[(|f|)|m]) 1 μ := by
refine snorm_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [condexp_mono hf hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => le_abs_self (f x) : ∀ x, f x ≤ |f x|)),
EventuallyLE.trans (condexp_neg f).symm.le
(condexp_mono hf.neg hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => neg_le_abs (f x): ∀ x, -f x ≤ |f x|)))] with x hx₁ hx₂
exact abs_le_abs hx₁ hx₂
_ = snorm f 1 μ := by
rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ←
ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal (ne_of_lt integrable_condexp.2) (ne_of_lt hf.2), ←
integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
(stronglyMeasurable_condexp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable,
← integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.1]
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw [← integral_condexp hm hf.abs]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[(|f|)|m] := by
rw [← condexp_zero]
exact condexp_mono (integrable_zero _ _ _) hf.abs
(ae_of_all μ (fun x => abs_nonneg (f x) : ∀ x, 0 ≤ |f x|))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
exact abs_eq_self.2 hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm MeasureTheory.snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm
theorem integral_abs_condexp_le (f : α → ℝ) : ∫ x, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, |f x| ∂μ := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap
· simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero]
positivity
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
swap
· simp only [condexp_undef hfint, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_zero]
positivity
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae, integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal] <;> simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, ← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
exact snorm_one_condexp_le_snorm _
· exact integrable_condexp.2.ne
· exact hfint.2.ne
· filter_upwards with x using abs_nonneg _
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact hfint.1.norm
· filter_upwards with x using abs_nonneg _
· simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact (stronglyMeasurable_condexp.mono hm).aestronglyMeasurable.norm
#align measure_theory.integral_abs_condexp_le MeasureTheory.integral_abs_condexp_le
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 116 | 138 | theorem setIntegral_abs_condexp_le {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (f : α → ℝ) :
∫ x in s, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ ≤ ∫ x in s, |f x| ∂μ := by |
by_cases hnm : m ≤ m0
swap
· simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hnm, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_zero]
positivity
by_cases hfint : Integrable f μ
swap
· simp only [condexp_undef hfint, Pi.zero_apply, abs_zero, integral_const, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_zero]
positivity
have : ∫ x in s, |(μ[f|m]) x| ∂μ = ∫ x, |(μ[s.indicator f|m]) x| ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_indicator (hnm _ hs)]
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
have : (fun x => |(μ[s.indicator f|m]) x|) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => |s.indicator (μ[f|m]) x| :=
(condexp_indicator hfint hs).fun_comp abs
refine EventuallyEq.trans (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_) this.symm
rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs]
rw [this, ← integral_indicator (hnm _ hs)]
refine (integral_abs_condexp_le _).trans
(le_of_eq <| integral_congr_ae <| eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
simp_rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
| 21 | 1,318,815,734.483215 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,408 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Projective
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Projective
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Basic
#align_import algebra.category.Module.projective from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"201a3f4a0e59b5f836fe8a6c1a462ee674327211"
universe v u u'
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open LinearMap
open ModuleCat
open scoped Module
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/ModuleCat/Projective.lean | 31 | 41 | theorem IsProjective.iff_projective {R : Type u} [Ring R] {P : Type max u v} [AddCommGroup P]
[Module R P] : Module.Projective R P ↔ Projective (ModuleCat.of R P) := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· letI : Module.Projective R (ModuleCat.of R P) := h
exact ⟨fun E X epi => Module.projective_lifting_property _ _
((ModuleCat.epi_iff_surjective _).mp epi)⟩
· refine Module.Projective.of_lifting_property.{u,v} ?_
intro E X mE mX sE sX f g s
haveI : Epi (↟f) := (ModuleCat.epi_iff_surjective (↟f)).mpr s
letI : Projective (ModuleCat.of R P) := h
exact ⟨Projective.factorThru (↟g) (↟f), Projective.factorThru_comp (↟g) (↟f)⟩
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,409 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses
#align_import measure_theory.decomposition.unsigned_hahn from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0f1becb755b3d008b242c622e248a70556ad19e6"
open Set Filter
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ ν : Measure α}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Decomposition/UnsignedHahn.lean | 37 | 176 | theorem hahn_decomposition [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] :
∃ s,
MeasurableSet s ∧
(∀ t, MeasurableSet t → t ⊆ s → ν t ≤ μ t) ∧ ∀ t, MeasurableSet t → t ⊆ sᶜ → μ t ≤ ν t := by |
let d : Set α → ℝ := fun s => ((μ s).toNNReal : ℝ) - (ν s).toNNReal
let c : Set ℝ := d '' { s | MeasurableSet s }
let γ : ℝ := sSup c
have hμ : ∀ s, μ s ≠ ∞ := measure_ne_top μ
have hν : ∀ s, ν s ≠ ∞ := measure_ne_top ν
have to_nnreal_μ : ∀ s, ((μ s).toNNReal : ℝ≥0∞) = μ s := fun s => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal <| hμ _
have to_nnreal_ν : ∀ s, ((ν s).toNNReal : ℝ≥0∞) = ν s := fun s => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal <| hν _
have d_split : ∀ s t, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet t → d s = d (s \ t) + d (s ∩ t) := by
intro s t _hs ht
dsimp only [d]
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff s ht, ← measure_inter_add_diff s ht,
ENNReal.toNNReal_add (hμ _) (hμ _), ENNReal.toNNReal_add (hν _) (hν _), NNReal.coe_add,
NNReal.coe_add]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
abel
have d_Union :
∀ s : ℕ → Set α, Monotone s → Tendsto (fun n => d (s n)) atTop (𝓝 (d (⋃ n, s n))) := by
intro s hm
refine Tendsto.sub ?_ ?_ <;>
refine NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal ?_).comp <| tendsto_measure_iUnion hm
· exact hμ _
· exact hν _
have d_Inter :
∀ s : ℕ → Set α,
(∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) →
(∀ n m, n ≤ m → s m ⊆ s n) → Tendsto (fun n => d (s n)) atTop (𝓝 (d (⋂ n, s n))) := by
intro s hs hm
refine Tendsto.sub ?_ ?_ <;>
refine
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <|
(ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal <| ?_).comp <| tendsto_measure_iInter hs hm ?_
exacts [hμ _, ⟨0, hμ _⟩, hν _, ⟨0, hν _⟩]
have bdd_c : BddAbove c := by
use (μ univ).toNNReal
rintro r ⟨s, _hs, rfl⟩
refine le_trans (sub_le_self _ <| NNReal.coe_nonneg _) ?_
rw [NNReal.coe_le_coe, ← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, to_nnreal_μ, to_nnreal_μ]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
have c_nonempty : c.Nonempty := Nonempty.image _ ⟨_, MeasurableSet.empty⟩
have d_le_γ : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → d s ≤ γ := fun s hs => le_csSup bdd_c ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s ∧ γ - (1 / 2) ^ n < d s := by
intro n
have : γ - (1 / 2) ^ n < γ := sub_lt_self γ (pow_pos (half_pos zero_lt_one) n)
rcases exists_lt_of_lt_csSup c_nonempty this with ⟨r, ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, hlt⟩
exact ⟨s, hs, hlt⟩
rcases Classical.axiom_of_choice this with ⟨e, he⟩
change ℕ → Set α at e
have he₁ : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (e n) := fun n => (he n).1
have he₂ : ∀ n, γ - (1 / 2) ^ n < d (e n) := fun n => (he n).2
let f : ℕ → ℕ → Set α := fun n m => (Finset.Ico n (m + 1)).inf e
have hf : ∀ n m, MeasurableSet (f n m) := by
intro n m
simp only [f, Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (to_countable _) fun i _ => he₁ _
have f_subset_f : ∀ {a b c d}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → f a d ⊆ f b c := by
intro a b c d hab hcd
simp_rw [f, Finset.inf_eq_iInf]
exact biInter_subset_biInter_left (Finset.Ico_subset_Ico hab <| Nat.succ_le_succ hcd)
have f_succ : ∀ n m, n ≤ m → f n (m + 1) = f n m ∩ e (m + 1) := by
intro n m hnm
have : n ≤ m + 1 := le_of_lt (Nat.succ_le_succ hnm)
simp_rw [f, Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico this, Finset.inf_insert, Set.inter_comm]
rfl
have le_d_f : ∀ n m, m ≤ n → γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m + (1 / 2) ^ n ≤ d (f m n) := by
intro n m h
refine Nat.le_induction ?_ ?_ n h
· have := he₂ m
simp_rw [f, Nat.Ico_succ_singleton, Finset.inf_singleton]
linarith
· intro n (hmn : m ≤ n) ih
have : γ + (γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m + (1 / 2) ^ (n + 1)) ≤ γ + d (f m (n + 1)) := by
calc
γ + (γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m + (1 / 2) ^ (n + 1)) =
γ + (γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m + ((1 / 2) ^ n - (1 / 2) ^ (n + 1))) := by
rw [pow_succ, mul_one_div, _root_.sub_half]
_ = γ - (1 / 2) ^ (n + 1) + (γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m + (1 / 2) ^ n) := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg]; abel
_ ≤ d (e (n + 1)) + d (f m n) := add_le_add (le_of_lt <| he₂ _) ih
_ ≤ d (e (n + 1)) + d (f m n \ e (n + 1)) + d (f m (n + 1)) := by
rw [f_succ _ _ hmn, d_split (f m n) (e (n + 1)) (hf _ _) (he₁ _), add_assoc]
_ = d (e (n + 1) ∪ f m n) + d (f m (n + 1)) := by
rw [d_split (e (n + 1) ∪ f m n) (e (n + 1)), union_diff_left, union_inter_cancel_left]
· abel
· exact (he₁ _).union (hf _ _)
· exact he₁ _
_ ≤ γ + d (f m (n + 1)) := add_le_add_right (d_le_γ _ <| (he₁ _).union (hf _ _)) _
exact (add_le_add_iff_left γ).1 this
let s := ⋃ m, ⋂ n, f m n
have γ_le_d_s : γ ≤ d s := by
have hγ : Tendsto (fun m : ℕ => γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m) atTop (𝓝 γ) := by
suffices Tendsto (fun m : ℕ => γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m) atTop (𝓝 (γ - 2 * 0)) by
simpa only [mul_zero, tsub_zero]
exact
tendsto_const_nhds.sub <|
tendsto_const_nhds.mul <|
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (le_of_lt <| half_pos <| zero_lt_one)
(half_lt_self zero_lt_one)
have hd : Tendsto (fun m => d (⋂ n, f m n)) atTop (𝓝 (d (⋃ m, ⋂ n, f m n))) := by
refine d_Union _ ?_
exact fun n m hnm =>
subset_iInter fun i => Subset.trans (iInter_subset (f n) i) <| f_subset_f hnm <| le_rfl
refine le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' hγ hd fun m => ?_
have : Tendsto (fun n => d (f m n)) atTop (𝓝 (d (⋂ n, f m n))) := by
refine d_Inter _ ?_ ?_
· intro n
exact hf _ _
· intro n m hnm
exact f_subset_f le_rfl hnm
refine ge_of_tendsto this (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨m, fun n hmn => ?_⟩)
change γ - 2 * (1 / 2) ^ m ≤ d (f m n)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_d_f _ _ hmn)
exact le_add_of_le_of_nonneg le_rfl (pow_nonneg (le_of_lt <| half_pos <| zero_lt_one) _)
have hs : MeasurableSet s := MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => MeasurableSet.iInter fun m => hf _ _
refine ⟨s, hs, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro t ht hts
have : 0 ≤ d t :=
(add_le_add_iff_left γ).1 <|
calc
γ + 0 ≤ d s := by rw [add_zero]; exact γ_le_d_s
_ = d (s \ t) + d t := by rw [d_split _ _ hs ht, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hts]
_ ≤ γ + d t := add_le_add (d_le_γ _ (hs.diff ht)) le_rfl
rw [← to_nnreal_μ, ← to_nnreal_ν, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe]
simpa only [d, le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add] using this
· intro t ht hts
have : d t ≤ 0 :=
(add_le_add_iff_left γ).1 <|
calc
γ + d t ≤ d s + d t := by gcongr
_ = d (s ∪ t) := by
rw [d_split _ _ (hs.union ht) ht, union_diff_right, union_inter_cancel_right,
(subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left.1 hts).sdiff_eq_left]
_ ≤ γ + 0 := by rw [add_zero]; exact d_le_γ _ (hs.union ht)
rw [← to_nnreal_μ, ← to_nnreal_ν, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe]
simpa only [d, sub_le_iff_le_add, zero_add] using this
| 134 | 15,684,135,116,819,640,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,410 |
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder
import Mathlib.Mathport.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
#align_import data.sigma.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1fc36cc9c8264e6e81253f88be7fb2cb6c92d76a"
namespace Sigma
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
-- Porting note: I made this `le` instead of `LE` because the output type is `Prop`
protected inductive le [∀ i, LE (α i)] : ∀ _a _b : Σ i, α i, Prop
| fiber (i : ι) (a b : α i) : a ≤ b → Sigma.le ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩
#align sigma.le Sigma.le
protected inductive lt [∀ i, LT (α i)] : ∀ _a _b : Σi, α i, Prop
| fiber (i : ι) (a b : α i) : a < b → Sigma.lt ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩
#align sigma.lt Sigma.lt
protected instance LE [∀ i, LE (α i)] : LE (Σi, α i) where
le := Sigma.le
protected instance LT [∀ i, LT (α i)] : LT (Σi, α i) where
lt := Sigma.lt
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk_iff [∀ i, LE (α i)] {i : ι} {a b : α i} : (⟨i, a⟩ : Sigma α) ≤ ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ => h, Sigma.le.fiber _ _ _⟩
#align sigma.mk_le_mk_iff Sigma.mk_le_mk_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt_mk_iff [∀ i, LT (α i)] {i : ι} {a b : α i} : (⟨i, a⟩ : Sigma α) < ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ => h, Sigma.lt.fiber _ _ _⟩
#align sigma.mk_lt_mk_iff Sigma.mk_lt_mk_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Sigma/Order.lean | 79 | 86 | theorem le_def [∀ i, LE (α i)] {a b : Σi, α i} : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ h : a.1 = b.1, h.rec a.2 ≤ b.2 := by |
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, b, h⟩
exact ⟨rfl, h⟩
· obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := a
obtain ⟨j, b⟩ := b
rintro ⟨rfl : i = j, h⟩
exact le.fiber _ _ _ h
| 7 | 1,096.633158 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,411 |
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder
import Mathlib.Mathport.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
#align_import data.sigma.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1fc36cc9c8264e6e81253f88be7fb2cb6c92d76a"
namespace Sigma
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
-- Porting note: I made this `le` instead of `LE` because the output type is `Prop`
protected inductive le [∀ i, LE (α i)] : ∀ _a _b : Σ i, α i, Prop
| fiber (i : ι) (a b : α i) : a ≤ b → Sigma.le ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩
#align sigma.le Sigma.le
protected inductive lt [∀ i, LT (α i)] : ∀ _a _b : Σi, α i, Prop
| fiber (i : ι) (a b : α i) : a < b → Sigma.lt ⟨i, a⟩ ⟨i, b⟩
#align sigma.lt Sigma.lt
protected instance LE [∀ i, LE (α i)] : LE (Σi, α i) where
le := Sigma.le
protected instance LT [∀ i, LT (α i)] : LT (Σi, α i) where
lt := Sigma.lt
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_mk_iff [∀ i, LE (α i)] {i : ι} {a b : α i} : (⟨i, a⟩ : Sigma α) ≤ ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ => h, Sigma.le.fiber _ _ _⟩
#align sigma.mk_le_mk_iff Sigma.mk_le_mk_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt_mk_iff [∀ i, LT (α i)] {i : ι} {a b : α i} : (⟨i, a⟩ : Sigma α) < ⟨i, b⟩ ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ => h, Sigma.lt.fiber _ _ _⟩
#align sigma.mk_lt_mk_iff Sigma.mk_lt_mk_iff
theorem le_def [∀ i, LE (α i)] {a b : Σi, α i} : a ≤ b ↔ ∃ h : a.1 = b.1, h.rec a.2 ≤ b.2 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, b, h⟩
exact ⟨rfl, h⟩
· obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := a
obtain ⟨j, b⟩ := b
rintro ⟨rfl : i = j, h⟩
exact le.fiber _ _ _ h
#align sigma.le_def Sigma.le_def
| Mathlib/Data/Sigma/Order.lean | 89 | 96 | theorem lt_def [∀ i, LT (α i)] {a b : Σi, α i} : a < b ↔ ∃ h : a.1 = b.1, h.rec a.2 < b.2 := by |
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, b, h⟩
exact ⟨rfl, h⟩
· obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := a
obtain ⟨j, b⟩ := b
rintro ⟨rfl : i = j, h⟩
exact lt.fiber _ _ _ h
| 7 | 1,096.633158 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,411 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
#align_import data.real.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dde670c9a3f503647fd5bfdf1037bad526d3397a"
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
section MulActionWithZero
variable [MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ] {a : α}
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pointwise.lean | 37 | 46 | theorem Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (s : Set ℝ) : sInf (a • s) = a • sInf s := by |
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sInf_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csInf_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddBelow s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRight ha').map_csInf' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow (mt (bddBelow_smul_iff_of_pos ha').1 h),
Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow h, smul_zero]
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,412 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
#align_import data.real.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dde670c9a3f503647fd5bfdf1037bad526d3397a"
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
section MulActionWithZero
variable [MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ] {a : α}
theorem Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (s : Set ℝ) : sInf (a • s) = a • sInf s := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sInf_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csInf_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddBelow s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRight ha').map_csInf' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow (mt (bddBelow_smul_iff_of_pos ha').1 h),
Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow h, smul_zero]
#align real.Inf_smul_of_nonneg Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg
theorem Real.smul_iInf_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (f : ι → ℝ) : (a • ⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, a • f i :=
(Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg ha _).symm.trans <| congr_arg sInf <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align real.smul_infi_of_nonneg Real.smul_iInf_of_nonneg
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pointwise.lean | 53 | 62 | theorem Real.sSup_smul_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) (s : Set ℝ) : sSup (a • s) = a • sSup s := by |
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sSup_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csSup_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddAbove s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRight ha').map_csSup' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove (mt (bddAbove_smul_iff_of_pos ha').1 h),
Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove h, smul_zero]
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,412 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
#align_import data.real.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dde670c9a3f503647fd5bfdf1037bad526d3397a"
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
section Module
variable [Module α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ] {a : α}
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pointwise.lean | 75 | 84 | theorem Real.sInf_smul_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (s : Set ℝ) : sInf (a • s) = a • sSup s := by |
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sInf_empty, Real.sSup_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csInf_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddAbove s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRightDual ℝ ha').map_csSup' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow (mt (bddBelow_smul_iff_of_neg ha').1 h),
Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove h, smul_zero]
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,412 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
#align_import data.real.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dde670c9a3f503647fd5bfdf1037bad526d3397a"
open Set
open Pointwise
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
section Module
variable [Module α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ] {a : α}
theorem Real.sInf_smul_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (s : Set ℝ) : sInf (a • s) = a • sSup s := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sInf_empty, Real.sSup_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csInf_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddAbove s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRightDual ℝ ha').map_csSup' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow (mt (bddBelow_smul_iff_of_neg ha').1 h),
Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove h, smul_zero]
#align real.Inf_smul_of_nonpos Real.sInf_smul_of_nonpos
theorem Real.smul_iSup_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (f : ι → ℝ) : (a • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨅ i, a • f i :=
(Real.sInf_smul_of_nonpos ha _).symm.trans <| congr_arg sInf <| (range_comp _ _).symm
#align real.smul_supr_of_nonpos Real.smul_iSup_of_nonpos
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pointwise.lean | 91 | 100 | theorem Real.sSup_smul_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) (s : Set ℝ) : sSup (a • s) = a • sInf s := by |
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [smul_set_empty, Real.sSup_empty, Real.sInf_empty, smul_zero]
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul_set hs, zero_smul]
exact csSup_singleton 0
by_cases h : BddBelow s
· exact ((OrderIso.smulRightDual ℝ ha').map_csInf' hs h).symm
· rw [Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove (mt (bddAbove_smul_iff_of_neg ha').1 h),
Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow h, smul_zero]
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,412 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HahnBanach.SeparatingDual
#align_import analysis.calculus.parametric_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter Metric
open scoped Topology Filter
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
variable {F : H → α → E} {x₀ : H} {bound : α → ℝ} {ε : ℝ}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/ParametricIntegral.lean | 75 | 155 | theorem hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_loc_of_lip' {F' : α → H →L[𝕜] E} (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (hF_int : Integrable (F x₀) μ)
(hF'_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable F' μ)
(h_lipsch : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ bound a * ‖x - x₀‖)
(bound_integrable : Integrable (bound : α → ℝ) μ)
(h_diff : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, HasFDerivAt (F · a) (F' a) x₀) :
Integrable F' μ ∧ HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) x₀ := by |
have x₀_in : x₀ ∈ ball x₀ ε := mem_ball_self ε_pos
have nneg : ∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ := fun x ↦ inv_nonneg.mpr (norm_nonneg _)
set b : α → ℝ := fun a ↦ |bound a|
have b_int : Integrable b μ := bound_integrable.norm
have b_nonneg : ∀ a, 0 ≤ b a := fun a ↦ abs_nonneg _
replace h_lipsch : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ b a * ‖x - x₀‖ :=
h_lipsch.mono fun a ha x hx ↦
(ha x hx).trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_abs_self _) (norm_nonneg _)
have hF_int' : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ ε, Integrable (F x) μ := fun x x_in ↦ by
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x₀ a - F x a‖ ≤ ε * b a := by
simp only [norm_sub_rev (F x₀ _)]
refine h_lipsch.mono fun a ha ↦ (ha x x_in).trans ?_
rw [mul_comm ε]
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at x_in
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left x_in.le (b_nonneg _)
exact integrable_of_norm_sub_le (hF_meas x x_in) hF_int
(bound_integrable.norm.const_mul ε) this
have hF'_int : Integrable F' μ :=
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F' a‖ ≤ b a := by
apply (h_diff.and h_lipsch).mono
rintro a ⟨ha_diff, ha_lip⟩
exact ha_diff.le_of_lip' (b_nonneg a) (mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos) <| ha_lip)
b_int.mono' hF'_meas this
refine ⟨hF'_int, ?_⟩
/- Discard the trivial case where `E` is not complete, as all integrals vanish. -/
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial H with hH|hH
· have : Subsingleton (H →L[𝕜] E) := inferInstance
convert hasFDerivAt_of_subsingleton _ x₀
· have : ¬(CompleteSpace (H →L[𝕜] E)) := by
simpa [SeparatingDual.completeSpace_continuousLinearMap_iff] using hE
simp only [integral, hE, ↓reduceDite, this]
exact hasFDerivAt_const 0 x₀
have h_ball : ball x₀ ε ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := ball_mem_nhds x₀ ε_pos
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖((∫ a, F x a ∂μ) - ∫ a, F x₀ a ∂μ) - (∫ a, F' a ∂μ) (x - x₀)‖ =
‖∫ a, ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀)) ∂μ‖ := by
apply mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds _ ε_pos)
intro x x_in; simp only
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← norm_smul_of_nonneg (nneg _), integral_smul, integral_sub, integral_sub,
← ContinuousLinearMap.integral_apply hF'_int]
exacts [hF_int' x x_in, hF_int, (hF_int' x x_in).sub hF_int,
hF'_int.apply_continuousLinearMap _]
rw [hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto, tendsto_congr' this, ← tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero, ←
show (∫ a : α, ‖x₀ - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x₀ a - F x₀ a - (F' a) (x₀ - x₀)) ∂μ) = 0 by simp]
apply tendsto_integral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
· filter_upwards [h_ball] with _ x_in
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul
exact ((hF_meas _ x_in).sub (hF_meas _ x₀_in)).sub (hF'_meas.apply_continuousLinearMap _)
· refine mem_of_superset h_ball fun x hx ↦ ?_
apply (h_diff.and h_lipsch).mono
on_goal 1 => rintro a ⟨-, ha_bound⟩
show ‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))‖ ≤ b a + ‖F' a‖
replace ha_bound : ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ ≤ b a * ‖x - x₀‖ := ha_bound x hx
calc
‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))‖ =
‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a) - ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • F' a (x - x₀)‖ := by rw [smul_sub]
_ ≤ ‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a)‖ + ‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • F' a (x - x₀)‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ = ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖F x a - F x₀ a‖ + ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖F' a (x - x₀)‖ := by
rw [norm_smul_of_nonneg, norm_smul_of_nonneg] <;> exact nneg _
_ ≤ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * (b a * ‖x - x₀‖) + ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * (‖F' a‖ * ‖x - x₀‖) := by
gcongr; exact (F' a).le_opNorm _
_ ≤ b a + ‖F' a‖ := ?_
simp only [← div_eq_inv_mul]
apply_rules [add_le_add, div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul] <;> first | rfl | positivity
· exact b_int.add hF'_int.norm
· apply h_diff.mono
intro a ha
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))) (𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 0) by simpa
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have : (fun x ↦ ‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ * ‖F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀)‖) = fun x ↦
‖‖x - x₀‖⁻¹ • (F x a - F x₀ a - F' a (x - x₀))‖ := by
ext x
rw [norm_smul_of_nonneg (nneg _)]
rwa [hasFDerivAt_iff_tendsto, this] at ha
| 74 | 137,338,297,954,017,610,000,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,413 |
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Final
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Countable
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Defs
open CategoryTheory Opposite CountableCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] (J : Type*) [Countable J]
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
class HasCountableLimits : Prop where
out (J : Type) [SmallCategory J] [CountableCategory J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteLimits_of_hasCountableLimits [HasCountableLimits C] :
HasFiniteLimits C where
out J := HasCountableLimits.out J
instance (priority := 100) hasCountableLimits_of_hasLimits [HasLimits C] :
HasCountableLimits C where
out := inferInstance
universe v in
instance [Category.{v} J] [CountableCategory J] [HasCountableLimits C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
have : HasLimitsOfShape (HomAsType J) C := HasCountableLimits.out (HomAsType J)
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (homAsTypeEquiv J)
class HasCountableColimits : Prop where
out (J : Type) [SmallCategory J] [CountableCategory J] : HasColimitsOfShape J C
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteColimits_of_hasCountableColimits [HasCountableColimits C] :
HasFiniteColimits C where
out J := HasCountableColimits.out J
instance (priority := 100) hasCountableColimits_of_hasColimits [HasColimits C] :
HasCountableColimits C where
out := inferInstance
universe v in
instance [Category.{v} J] [CountableCategory J] [HasCountableColimits C] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
have : HasColimitsOfShape (HomAsType J) C := HasCountableColimits.out (HomAsType J)
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (homAsTypeEquiv J)
section Preorder
attribute [local instance] IsCofiltered.nonempty
variable {C} [Preorder J] [IsCofiltered J]
noncomputable def sequentialFunctor_obj : ℕ → J := fun
| .zero => (exists_surjective_nat _).choose 0
| .succ n => (IsCofilteredOrEmpty.cone_objs ((exists_surjective_nat _).choose n)
(sequentialFunctor_obj n)).choose
theorem sequentialFunctor_map : Antitone (sequentialFunctor_obj J) :=
antitone_nat_of_succ_le fun n ↦
leOfHom (IsCofilteredOrEmpty.cone_objs ((exists_surjective_nat _).choose n)
(sequentialFunctor_obj J n)).choose_spec.choose_spec.choose
noncomputable def sequentialFunctor : ℕᵒᵖ ⥤ J where
obj n := sequentialFunctor_obj J (unop n)
map h := homOfLE (sequentialFunctor_map J (leOfHom h.unop))
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Countable.lean | 102 | 106 | theorem sequentialFunctor_initial_aux (j : J) : ∃ (n : ℕ), sequentialFunctor_obj J n ≤ j := by |
obtain ⟨m, h⟩ := (exists_surjective_nat _).choose_spec j
refine ⟨m + 1, ?_⟩
simpa [h] using leOfHom (IsCofilteredOrEmpty.cone_objs ((exists_surjective_nat _).choose m)
(sequentialFunctor_obj J m)).choose_spec.choose
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,414 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.SignedLebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensityVectorMeasure
#align_import measure_theory.decomposition.radon_nikodym from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fc75855907eaa8ff39791039710f567f37d4556f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
variable {α β : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Decomposition/RadonNikodym.lean | 56 | 66 | theorem withDensity_rnDeriv_eq (μ ν : Measure α) [HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ν] (h : μ ≪ ν) :
ν.withDensity (rnDeriv μ ν) = μ := by |
suffices μ.singularPart ν = 0 by
conv_rhs => rw [haveLebesgueDecomposition_add μ ν, this, zero_add]
suffices μ.singularPart ν Set.univ = 0 by simpa using this
have h_sing := mutuallySingular_singularPart μ ν
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl h_sing.measurableSet_nullSet]
simp only [MutuallySingular.measure_nullSet, zero_add]
refine le_antisymm ?_ (zero_le _)
refine (singularPart_le μ ν ?_ ).trans_eq ?_
exact h h_sing.measure_compl_nullSet
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,415 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Adjoint
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LagrangeMultipliers
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.rayleigh from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped NNReal
open Module.End Metric
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable (T : E →L[𝕜] E)
noncomputable abbrev rayleighQuotient (x : E) := T.reApplyInnerSelf x / ‖(x : E)‖ ^ 2
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Rayleigh.lean | 57 | 64 | theorem rayleigh_smul (x : E) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
rayleighQuotient T (c • x) = rayleighQuotient T x := by |
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
have : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hc]
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul, T.reApplyInnerSelf_smul]
ring
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,416 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Adjoint
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LagrangeMultipliers
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.rayleigh from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped NNReal
open Module.End Metric
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable (T : E →L[𝕜] E)
noncomputable abbrev rayleighQuotient (x : E) := T.reApplyInnerSelf x / ‖(x : E)‖ ^ 2
theorem rayleigh_smul (x : E) {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
rayleighQuotient T (c • x) = rayleighQuotient T x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
have : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hc]
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
field_simp [norm_smul, T.reApplyInnerSelf_smul]
ring
#align continuous_linear_map.rayleigh_smul ContinuousLinearMap.rayleigh_smul
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Rayleigh.lean | 67 | 80 | theorem image_rayleigh_eq_image_rayleigh_sphere {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
rayleighQuotient T '' {0}ᶜ = rayleighQuotient T '' sphere 0 r := by |
ext a
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx : x ≠ 0, hxT⟩
have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
let c : 𝕜 := ↑‖x‖⁻¹ * r
have : c ≠ 0 := by simp [c, hx, hr.ne']
refine ⟨c • x, ?_, ?_⟩
· field_simp [c, norm_smul, abs_of_pos hr]
· rw [T.rayleigh_smul x this]
exact hxT
· rintro ⟨x, hx, hxT⟩
exact ⟨x, ne_zero_of_mem_sphere hr.ne' ⟨x, hx⟩, hxT⟩
| 12 | 162,754.791419 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,416 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Adjoint
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LagrangeMultipliers
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.rayleigh from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped NNReal
open Module.End Metric
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
section Real
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Rayleigh.lean | 107 | 114 | theorem _root_.LinearMap.IsSymmetric.hasStrictFDerivAt_reApplyInnerSelf {T : F →L[ℝ] F}
(hT : (T : F →ₗ[ℝ] F).IsSymmetric) (x₀ : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt T.reApplyInnerSelf (2 • (innerSL ℝ (T x₀))) x₀ := by |
convert T.hasStrictFDerivAt.inner ℝ (hasStrictFDerivAt_id x₀) using 1
ext y
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, fderivInnerCLM_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.prod_apply, innerSL_apply, id, ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply,
hT.apply_clm x₀ y, real_inner_comm _ x₀, two_smul]
| 5 | 148.413159 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,416 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Calculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Adjoint
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LagrangeMultipliers
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.rayleigh from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped NNReal
open Module.End Metric
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
section Real
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
theorem _root_.LinearMap.IsSymmetric.hasStrictFDerivAt_reApplyInnerSelf {T : F →L[ℝ] F}
(hT : (T : F →ₗ[ℝ] F).IsSymmetric) (x₀ : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt T.reApplyInnerSelf (2 • (innerSL ℝ (T x₀))) x₀ := by
convert T.hasStrictFDerivAt.inner ℝ (hasStrictFDerivAt_id x₀) using 1
ext y
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, fderivInnerCLM_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.prod_apply, innerSL_apply, id, ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply,
hT.apply_clm x₀ y, real_inner_comm _ x₀, two_smul]
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.has_strict_fderiv_at_re_apply_inner_self LinearMap.IsSymmetric.hasStrictFDerivAt_reApplyInnerSelf
variable [CompleteSpace F] {T : F →L[ℝ] F}
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Rayleigh.lean | 119 | 138 | theorem linearly_dependent_of_isLocalExtrOn (hT : IsSelfAdjoint T) {x₀ : F}
(hextr : IsLocalExtrOn T.reApplyInnerSelf (sphere (0 : F) ‖x₀‖) x₀) :
∃ a b : ℝ, (a, b) ≠ 0 ∧ a • x₀ + b • T x₀ = 0 := by |
have H : IsLocalExtrOn T.reApplyInnerSelf {x : F | ‖x‖ ^ 2 = ‖x₀‖ ^ 2} x₀ := by
convert hextr
ext x
simp [dist_eq_norm]
-- find Lagrange multipliers for the function `T.re_apply_inner_self` and the
-- hypersurface-defining function `fun x ↦ ‖x‖ ^ 2`
obtain ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩ :=
IsLocalExtrOn.exists_multipliers_of_hasStrictFDerivAt_1d H (hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq x₀)
(hT.isSymmetric.hasStrictFDerivAt_reApplyInnerSelf x₀)
refine ⟨a, b, h₁, ?_⟩
apply (InnerProductSpace.toDualMap ℝ F).injective
simp only [LinearIsometry.map_add, LinearIsometry.map_smul, LinearIsometry.map_zero]
-- Note: #8386 changed `map_smulₛₗ` into `map_smulₛₗ _`
simp only [map_smulₛₗ _, RCLike.conj_to_real]
change a • innerSL ℝ x₀ + b • innerSL ℝ (T x₀) = 0
apply smul_right_injective (F →L[ℝ] ℝ) (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0)
simpa only [two_smul, smul_add, add_smul, add_zero] using h₂
| 17 | 24,154,952.753575 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,416 |
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Charpoly.Coeff
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.charpoly.minpoly from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7ae139f966795f684fc689186f9ccbaedd31bf31"
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Polynomial Matrix
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {n : Type v} [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable {N : Type w} [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N]
open Finset
section PowerBasis
open Algebra
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Charpoly/Minpoly.lean | 83 | 92 | theorem charpoly_leftMulMatrix {S : Type*} [Ring S] [Algebra R S] (h : PowerBasis R S) :
(leftMulMatrix h.basis h.gen).charpoly = minpoly R h.gen := by |
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R; · apply Subsingleton.elim
apply minpoly.unique' R h.gen (charpoly_monic _)
· apply (injective_iff_map_eq_zero (G := S) (leftMulMatrix _)).mp
(leftMulMatrix_injective h.basis)
rw [← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply, aeval_self_charpoly]
refine fun q hq => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h0 => ?_
rw [Matrix.charpoly_degree_eq_dim, Fintype.card_fin] at hq
contrapose! hq; exact h.dim_le_degree_of_root h0 hq
| 8 | 2,980.957987 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,417 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
#align_import analysis.specific_limits.floor_pow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b9eaaa7686280fad8cce467f5c3c57ee6ce77f8"
open Filter Finset
open Topology
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/FloorPow.lean | 28 | 182 | theorem tendsto_div_of_monotone_of_exists_subseq_tendsto_div (u : ℕ → ℝ) (l : ℝ)
(hmono : Monotone u)
(hlim : ∀ a : ℝ, 1 < a → ∃ c : ℕ → ℕ, (∀ᶠ n in atTop, (c (n + 1) : ℝ) ≤ a * c n) ∧
Tendsto c atTop atTop ∧ Tendsto (fun n => u (c n) / c n) atTop (𝓝 l)) :
Tendsto (fun n => u n / n) atTop (𝓝 l) := by |
/- To check the result up to some `ε > 0`, we use a sequence `c` for which the ratio
`c (N+1) / c N` is bounded by `1 + ε`. Sandwiching a given `n` between two consecutive values of
`c`, say `c N` and `c (N+1)`, one can then bound `u n / n` from above by `u (c N) / c (N - 1)`
and from below by `u (c (N - 1)) / c N` (using that `u` is monotone), which are both comparable
to the limit `l` up to `1 + ε`.
We give a version of this proof by clearing out denominators first, to avoid discussing the sign
of different quantities. -/
have lnonneg : 0 ≤ l := by
rcases hlim 2 one_lt_two with ⟨c, _, ctop, clim⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n => u 0 / c n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.div_atTop (tendsto_natCast_atTop_iff.2 ctop)
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' this clim fun n => ?_
gcongr
exact hmono (zero_le _)
have A : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n - n * l ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * n := by
intro ε εpos
rcases hlim (1 + ε) ((lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 εpos) with ⟨c, cgrowth, ctop, clim⟩
have L : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, u (c n) - c n * l ≤ ε * c n := by
rw [← tendsto_sub_nhds_zero_iff, ← Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_iff ℝ,
Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at clim
filter_upwards [clim εpos, ctop (Ioi_mem_atTop 0)] with n hn cnpos'
have cnpos : 0 < c n := cnpos'
calc
u (c n) - c n * l = (u (c n) / c n - l) * c n := by
simp only [cnpos.ne', Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff, field_simps]
_ ≤ ε * c n := by
gcongr
refine (le_abs_self _).trans ?_
simpa using hn
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ :
∃ a : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, a ≤ b → (c (b + 1) : ℝ) ≤ (1 + ε) * c b ∧ u (c b) - c b * l ≤ ε * c b :=
eventually_atTop.1 (cgrowth.and L)
let M := ((Finset.range (a + 1)).image fun i => c i).max' (by simp)
filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop M] with n hn
have exN : ∃ N, n < c N := by
rcases (tendsto_atTop.1 ctop (n + 1)).exists with ⟨N, hN⟩
exact ⟨N, by linarith only [hN]⟩
let N := Nat.find exN
have ncN : n < c N := Nat.find_spec exN
have aN : a + 1 ≤ N := by
by_contra! h
have cNM : c N ≤ M := by
apply le_max'
apply mem_image_of_mem
exact mem_range.2 h
exact lt_irrefl _ ((cNM.trans hn).trans_lt ncN)
have Npos : 0 < N := lt_of_lt_of_le Nat.succ_pos' aN
have cNn : c (N - 1) ≤ n := by
have : N - 1 < N := Nat.pred_lt Npos.ne'
simpa only [not_lt] using Nat.find_min exN this
have IcN : (c N : ℝ) ≤ (1 + ε) * c (N - 1) := by
have A : a ≤ N - 1 := by
apply @Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right a 1 (N - 1)
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel Npos]
exact aN
have B : N - 1 + 1 = N := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos Npos
have := (ha _ A).1
rwa [B] at this
calc
u n - n * l ≤ u (c N) - c (N - 1) * l := by gcongr; exact hmono ncN.le
_ = u (c N) - c N * l + (c N - c (N - 1)) * l := by ring
_ ≤ ε * c N + ε * c (N - 1) * l := by
gcongr
· exact (ha N (a.le_succ.trans aN)).2
· linarith only [IcN]
_ ≤ ε * ((1 + ε) * c (N - 1)) + ε * c (N - 1) * l := by gcongr
_ = ε * (1 + ε + l) * c (N - 1) := by ring
_ ≤ ε * (1 + ε + l) * n := by gcongr
have B : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, (n : ℝ) * l - u n ≤ ε * (1 + l) * n := by
intro ε εpos
rcases hlim (1 + ε) ((lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 εpos) with ⟨c, cgrowth, ctop, clim⟩
have L : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, (c n : ℝ) * l - u (c n) ≤ ε * c n := by
rw [← tendsto_sub_nhds_zero_iff, ← Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_iff ℝ,
Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff] at clim
filter_upwards [clim εpos, ctop (Ioi_mem_atTop 0)] with n hn cnpos'
have cnpos : 0 < c n := cnpos'
calc
(c n : ℝ) * l - u (c n) = -(u (c n) / c n - l) * c n := by
simp only [cnpos.ne', Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, not_false_iff, neg_sub, field_simps]
_ ≤ ε * c n := by
gcongr
refine le_trans (neg_le_abs _) ?_
simpa using hn
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ :
∃ a : ℕ,
∀ b : ℕ, a ≤ b → (c (b + 1) : ℝ) ≤ (1 + ε) * c b ∧ (c b : ℝ) * l - u (c b) ≤ ε * c b :=
eventually_atTop.1 (cgrowth.and L)
let M := ((Finset.range (a + 1)).image fun i => c i).max' (by simp)
filter_upwards [Ici_mem_atTop M] with n hn
have exN : ∃ N, n < c N := by
rcases (tendsto_atTop.1 ctop (n + 1)).exists with ⟨N, hN⟩
exact ⟨N, by linarith only [hN]⟩
let N := Nat.find exN
have ncN : n < c N := Nat.find_spec exN
have aN : a + 1 ≤ N := by
by_contra! h
have cNM : c N ≤ M := by
apply le_max'
apply mem_image_of_mem
exact mem_range.2 h
exact lt_irrefl _ ((cNM.trans hn).trans_lt ncN)
have Npos : 0 < N := lt_of_lt_of_le Nat.succ_pos' aN
have aN' : a ≤ N - 1 := by
apply @Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right a 1 (N - 1)
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel Npos]
exact aN
have cNn : c (N - 1) ≤ n := by
have : N - 1 < N := Nat.pred_lt Npos.ne'
simpa only [not_lt] using Nat.find_min exN this
calc
(n : ℝ) * l - u n ≤ c N * l - u (c (N - 1)) := by
gcongr
exact hmono cNn
_ ≤ (1 + ε) * c (N - 1) * l - u (c (N - 1)) := by
gcongr
have B : N - 1 + 1 = N := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos Npos
simpa [B] using (ha _ aN').1
_ = c (N - 1) * l - u (c (N - 1)) + ε * c (N - 1) * l := by ring
_ ≤ ε * c (N - 1) + ε * c (N - 1) * l := add_le_add (ha _ aN').2 le_rfl
_ = ε * (1 + l) * c (N - 1) := by ring
_ ≤ ε * (1 + l) * n := by gcongr
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun d hd => ?_, fun d hd => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨ε, hε, εpos⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, d + ε * (1 + l) < l ∧ 0 < ε := by
have L : Tendsto (fun ε => d + ε * (1 + l)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (d + 0 * (1 + l))) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds
exact tendsto_const_nhds.add (tendsto_id.mul tendsto_const_nhds)
simp only [zero_mul, add_zero] at L
exact (((tendsto_order.1 L).2 l hd).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
filter_upwards [B ε εpos, Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with n hn npos
simp_rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
calc
d < (n : ℝ)⁻¹ * n * (l - ε * (1 + l)) := by
rw [inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
· linarith only [hε]
· exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt npos)
_ = (n : ℝ)⁻¹ * (n * l - ε * (1 + l) * n) := by ring
_ ≤ (n : ℝ)⁻¹ * u n := by gcongr; linarith only [hn]
· obtain ⟨ε, hε, εpos⟩ : ∃ ε : ℝ, l + ε * (1 + ε + l) < d ∧ 0 < ε := by
have L : Tendsto (fun ε => l + ε * (1 + ε + l)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (l + 0 * (1 + 0 + l))) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ nhdsWithin_le_nhds
exact
tendsto_const_nhds.add
(tendsto_id.mul ((tendsto_const_nhds.add tendsto_id).add tendsto_const_nhds))
simp only [zero_mul, add_zero] at L
exact (((tendsto_order.1 L).2 d hd).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
filter_upwards [A ε εpos, Ioi_mem_atTop 0] with n hn (npos : 0 < n)
calc
u n / n ≤ (n * l + ε * (1 + ε + l) * n) / n := by gcongr; linarith only [hn]
_ = (l + ε * (1 + ε + l)) := by field_simp; ring
_ < d := hε
| 150 | 139,370,958,066,637,970,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,418 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.Basic
#align_import field_theory.finite.polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5aa3c1de9f3c642eac76e11071c852766f220fd0"
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*}
theorem C_dvd_iff_zmod (n : ℕ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ ℤ) :
C (n : ℤ) ∣ φ ↔ map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod n)) φ = 0 :=
C_dvd_iff_map_hom_eq_zero _ _ (CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n) _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.C_dvd_iff_zmod MvPolynomial.C_dvd_iff_zmod
section frobenius
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Finite/Polynomial.lean | 33 | 38 | theorem frobenius_zmod (f : MvPolynomial σ (ZMod p)) : frobenius _ p f = expand p f := by |
apply induction_on f
· intro a; rw [expand_C, frobenius_def, ← C_pow, ZMod.pow_card]
· simp only [AlgHom.map_add, RingHom.map_add]; intro _ _ hf hg; rw [hf, hg]
· simp only [expand_X, RingHom.map_mul, AlgHom.map_mul]
intro _ _ hf; rw [hf, frobenius_def]
| 5 | 148.413159 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,419 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
#align_import algebra.algebra.subalgebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b915e9392ecb2a861e1e766f0e1df6ac481188ca"
namespace Subalgebra
open Algebra
variable {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
variable (S' : Subalgebra R S)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Operations.lean | 40 | 68 | theorem mem_of_finset_sum_eq_one_of_pow_smul_mem
{ι : Type*} (ι' : Finset ι) (s : ι → S) (l : ι → S)
(e : ∑ i ∈ ι', l i * s i = 1) (hs : ∀ i, s i ∈ S') (hl : ∀ i, l i ∈ S') (x : S)
(H : ∀ i, ∃ n : ℕ, (s i ^ n : S) • x ∈ S') : x ∈ S' := by |
-- Porting note: needed to add this instance
let _i : Algebra { x // x ∈ S' } { x // x ∈ S' } := Algebra.id _
suffices x ∈ Subalgebra.toSubmodule (Algebra.ofId S' S).range by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := this
exact x.2
choose n hn using H
let s' : ι → S' := fun x => ⟨s x, hs x⟩
let l' : ι → S' := fun x => ⟨l x, hl x⟩
have e' : ∑ i ∈ ι', l' i * s' i = 1 := by
ext
show S'.subtype (∑ i ∈ ι', l' i * s' i) = 1
simpa only [map_sum, map_mul] using e
have : Ideal.span (s' '' ι') = ⊤ := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, ← e']
apply sum_mem
intros i hi
exact Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ <| Ideal.subset_span <| Set.mem_image_of_mem s' hi
let N := ι'.sup n
have hN := Ideal.span_pow_eq_top _ this N
apply (Algebra.ofId S' S).range.toSubmodule.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ hN
rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
change s' i ^ N • x ∈ _
rw [← tsub_add_cancel_of_le (show n i ≤ N from Finset.le_sup hi), pow_add, mul_smul]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ (⟨_, pow_mem (hs i) _⟩ : S') ?_
exact ⟨⟨_, hn i⟩, rfl⟩
| 25 | 72,004,899,337.38586 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,420 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.covering.differentiation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
#align vitali_family.lim_ratio VitaliFamily.limRatio
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 97 | 113 | theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by |
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
| 15 | 3,269,017.372472 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,421 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.covering.differentiation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
#align vitali_family.lim_ratio VitaliFamily.limRatio
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
#align vitali_family.ae_eventually_measure_pos VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
#align vitali_family.eventually_measure_lt_top VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 125 | 149 | theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by |
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
| 22 | 3,584,912,846.131591 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,421 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue
#align_import measure_theory.covering.differentiation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
#align vitali_family.lim_ratio VitaliFamily.limRatio
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp (config := { zeta := false }) only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
#align vitali_family.ae_eventually_measure_pos VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
#align vitali_family.eventually_measure_lt_top VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top
theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
#align vitali_family.measure_le_of_frequently_le VitaliFamily.measure_le_of_frequently_le
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {ρ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ρ]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 160 | 201 | theorem ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (hρ : ρ ⟂ₘ μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by |
have A : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a := by
intro ε εpos
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a} with hs
change μ s = 0
obtain ⟨o, _, ρo, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, MeasurableSet o ∧ ρ o = 0 ∧ μ oᶜ = 0 := hρ
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ o ∪ oᶜ) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inter_union_compl s o]
gcongr
apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ o) + μ oᶜ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (s ∩ o) := by rw [μo, add_zero]
_ = (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * (ε • μ) (s ∩ o) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne' ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ (s ∩ o) := by
gcongr
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ ((Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl μ).smul ε) _ ?_
intro x hx
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [mem_inter_iff, not_lt, not_eventually, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
exact hx.1
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ o := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = 0 := by rw [ρo, mul_zero]
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ≥0, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < u n * μ a :=
ae_all_iff.2 fun n => A (u n) (u_pos n)
filter_upwards [B, v.ae_eventually_measure_pos]
intro x hx h'x
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun z hz => (ENNReal.not_lt_zero hz).elim, fun z hz => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨w, w_pos, w_lt⟩ : ∃ w : ℝ≥0, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < w ∧ (w : ℝ≥0∞) < z :=
ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hz
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < w := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 w (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 w_pos)).exists
filter_upwards [hx n, h'x, v.eventually_measure_lt_top x]
intro a ha μa_pos μa_lt_top
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl μa_pos.ne') (Or.inl μa_lt_top.ne)]
exact ha.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' ((ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 hn.le).trans w_lt.le) _)
| 40 | 235,385,266,837,019,970 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,421 |
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Embedding
#align_import data.fintype.card_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
local notation "|" x "|" => Finset.card x
local notation "‖" x "‖" => Fintype.card x
open Function
open Nat
namespace Fintype
theorem card_embedding_eq_of_unique {α β : Type*} [Unique α] [Fintype β] [Fintype (α ↪ β)] :
‖α ↪ β‖ = ‖β‖ :=
card_congr Equiv.uniqueEmbeddingEquivResult
#align fintype.card_embedding_eq_of_unique Fintype.card_embedding_eq_of_unique
-- Establishes the cardinality of the type of all injections between two finite types.
-- Porting note: `induction'` is broken so instead we make an ugly refine and `dsimp` a lot.
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/CardEmbedding.lean | 36 | 50 | theorem card_embedding_eq {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] [emb : Fintype (α ↪ β)] :
‖α ↪ β‖ = ‖β‖.descFactorial ‖α‖ := by |
rw [Subsingleton.elim emb Embedding.fintype]
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option (P := fun t ↦ ‖t ↪ β‖ = ‖β‖.descFactorial ‖t‖)
(fun α₁ α₂ h₂ e ih ↦ ?_) (?_) (fun γ h ih ↦ ?_) α <;> dsimp only <;> clear! α
· letI := Fintype.ofEquiv _ e.symm
rw [← card_congr (Equiv.embeddingCongr e (Equiv.refl β)), ih, card_congr e]
· rw [card_pempty, Nat.descFactorial_zero, card_eq_one_iff]
exact ⟨Embedding.ofIsEmpty, fun x ↦ DFunLike.ext _ _ isEmptyElim⟩
· classical
dsimp only at ih
rw [card_option, Nat.descFactorial_succ, card_congr (Embedding.optionEmbeddingEquiv γ β),
card_sigma, ← ih]
simp only [Fintype.card_compl_set, Fintype.card_range, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ,
Nat.nsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
| 13 | 442,413.392009 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,422 |
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.operations from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e7f0ddbf65bd7181a85edb74b64bdc35ba4bdc74"
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
assert_not_exists Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Ideal
section MapAndComap
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
section Semiring
variable {F : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S]
variable [FunLike F R S] [rc : RingHomClass F R S]
variable (f : F)
variable {I J : Ideal R} {K L : Ideal S}
def map (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S :=
span (f '' I)
#align ideal.map Ideal.map
def comap (I : Ideal S) : Ideal R where
carrier := f ⁻¹' I
add_mem' {x y} hx hy := by
simp only [Set.mem_preimage, SetLike.mem_coe, map_add f] at hx hy ⊢
exact add_mem hx hy
zero_mem' := by simp only [Set.mem_preimage, map_zero, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem]
smul_mem' c x hx := by
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Set.mem_preimage, map_mul, SetLike.mem_coe] at *
exact mul_mem_left I _ hx
#align ideal.comap Ideal.comap
@[simp]
theorem coe_comap (I : Ideal S) : (comap f I : Set R) = f ⁻¹' I := rfl
variable {f}
theorem map_mono (h : I ≤ J) : map f I ≤ map f J :=
span_mono <| Set.image_subset _ h
#align ideal.map_mono Ideal.map_mono
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : F) {I : Ideal R} {x : R} (h : x ∈ I) : f x ∈ map f I :=
subset_span ⟨x, h, rfl⟩
#align ideal.mem_map_of_mem Ideal.mem_map_of_mem
theorem apply_coe_mem_map (f : F) (I : Ideal R) (x : I) : f x ∈ I.map f :=
mem_map_of_mem f x.2
#align ideal.apply_coe_mem_map Ideal.apply_coe_mem_map
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap : map f I ≤ K ↔ I ≤ comap f K :=
span_le.trans Set.image_subset_iff
#align ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap
@[simp]
theorem mem_comap {x} : x ∈ comap f K ↔ f x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_comap Ideal.mem_comap
theorem comap_mono (h : K ≤ L) : comap f K ≤ comap f L :=
Set.preimage_mono fun _ hx => h hx
#align ideal.comap_mono Ideal.comap_mono
variable (f)
theorem comap_ne_top (hK : K ≠ ⊤) : comap f K ≠ ⊤ :=
(ne_top_iff_one _).2 <| by rw [mem_comap, map_one]; exact (ne_top_iff_one _).1 hK
#align ideal.comap_ne_top Ideal.comap_ne_top
variable {G : Type*} [FunLike G S R] [rcg : RingHomClass G S R]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Maps.lean | 90 | 95 | theorem map_le_comap_of_inv_on (g : G) (I : Ideal R) (hf : Set.LeftInvOn g f I) :
I.map f ≤ I.comap g := by |
refine Ideal.span_le.2 ?_
rintro x ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_comap, hf hx]
exact hx
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,423 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.mv_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {m n R S : Type*}
namespace Matrix
variable (m n R)
noncomputable def mvPolynomialX [CommSemiring R] : Matrix m n (MvPolynomial (m × n) R) :=
of fun i j => MvPolynomial.X (i, j)
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X Matrix.mvPolynomialX
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `mv_polynomial_X`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem mvPolynomialX_apply [CommSemiring R] (i j) :
mvPolynomialX m n R i j = MvPolynomial.X (i, j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_apply Matrix.mvPolynomialX_apply
variable {m n R}
theorem mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (A : Matrix m n S) :
(mvPolynomialX m n R).map (MvPolynomial.eval₂ f fun p : m × n => A p.1 p.2) = A :=
ext fun i j => MvPolynomial.eval₂_X _ (fun p : m × n => A p.1 p.2) (i, j)
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_map_eval₂ Matrix.mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂
theorem mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_eval [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommSemiring R]
(A : Matrix m m R) :
(MvPolynomial.eval fun p : m × m => A p.1 p.2).mapMatrix (mvPolynomialX m m R) = A :=
mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ _ A
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_map_matrix_eval Matrix.mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_eval
variable (R)
theorem mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_aeval [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] (A : Matrix m m S) :
(MvPolynomial.aeval fun p : m × m => A p.1 p.2).mapMatrix (mvPolynomialX m m R) = A :=
mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ _ A
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_map_matrix_aeval Matrix.mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_aeval
variable (m)
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/MvPolynomial.lean | 75 | 80 | theorem det_mvPolynomialX_ne_zero [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] :
det (mvPolynomialX m m R) ≠ 0 := by |
intro h_det
have := congr_arg Matrix.det (mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_eval (1 : Matrix m m R))
rw [det_one, ← RingHom.map_det, h_det, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact zero_ne_one this
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,424 |
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Jacobson
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.MvPolynomial
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.nullstellensatz from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9556784a5b84697562e9c6acb40500d4a82e675a"
open Ideal
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open MvPolynomial
variable {k : Type*} [Field k]
variable {σ : Type*}
def zeroLocus (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) : Set (σ → k) :=
{x : σ → k | ∀ p ∈ I, eval x p = 0}
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus MvPolynomial.zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem mem_zeroLocus_iff {I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)} {x : σ → k} :
x ∈ zeroLocus I ↔ ∀ p ∈ I, eval x p = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align mv_polynomial.mem_zero_locus_iff MvPolynomial.mem_zeroLocus_iff
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono {I J : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)} (h : I ≤ J) :
zeroLocus J ≤ zeroLocus I := fun _ hx p hp => hx p <| h hp
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_anti_mono MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_anti_mono
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_bot : zeroLocus (⊥ : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x _ _ hp => Trans.trans (congr_arg (eval x) (mem_bot.1 hp)) (eval x).map_zero
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_bot MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_bot
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_top : zeroLocus (⊤ : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 fun x hx => one_ne_zero ((eval x).map_one ▸ hx 1 Submodule.mem_top : (1 : k) = 0)
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_top MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_top
def vanishingIdeal (V : Set (σ → k)) : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k) where
carrier := {p | ∀ x ∈ V, eval x p = 0}
zero_mem' x _ := RingHom.map_zero _
add_mem' {p q} hp hq x hx := by simp only [hq x hx, hp x hx, add_zero, RingHom.map_add]
smul_mem' p q hq x hx := by
simp only [hq x hx, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, RingHom.map_mul]
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal
@[simp]
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal_iff {V : Set (σ → k)} {p : MvPolynomial σ k} :
p ∈ vanishingIdeal V ↔ ∀ x ∈ V, eval x p = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align mv_polynomial.mem_vanishing_ideal_iff MvPolynomial.mem_vanishingIdeal_iff
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono {A B : Set (σ → k)} (h : A ≤ B) :
vanishingIdeal B ≤ vanishingIdeal A := fun _ hp x hx => hp x <| h hx
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal_anti_mono MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono
theorem vanishingIdeal_empty : vanishingIdeal (∅ : Set (σ → k)) = ⊤ :=
le_antisymm le_top fun _ _ x hx => absurd hx (Set.not_mem_empty x)
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal_empty MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal_empty
theorem le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) :
I ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus I) := fun p hp _ hx => hx p hp
#align mv_polynomial.le_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus MvPolynomial.le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_le (V : Set (σ → k)) : V ≤ zeroLocus (vanishingIdeal V) :=
fun V hV _ hp => hp V hV
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_le MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_le
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_galoisConnection :
@GaloisConnection (Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) (Set (σ → k))ᵒᵈ _ _ zeroLocus vanishingIdeal :=
GaloisConnection.monotone_intro (fun _ _ ↦ vanishingIdeal_anti_mono)
(fun _ _ ↦ zeroLocus_anti_mono) le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_le
#align mv_polynomial.zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_galois_connection MvPolynomial.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_galoisConnection
theorem le_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal {V : Set (σ → k)} {I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)} :
V ≤ zeroLocus I ↔ I ≤ vanishingIdeal V :=
zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_galoisConnection.le_iff_le
theorem zeroLocus_span (S : Set (MvPolynomial σ k)) :
zeroLocus (Ideal.span S) = { x | ∀ p ∈ S, eval x p = 0 } :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ => le_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal.trans <|
Ideal.span_le.trans forall₂_swap
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff (x : σ → k) (p : MvPolynomial σ k) :
p ∈ (vanishingIdeal {x} : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) ↔ eval x p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => h x rfl, fun hpx _ hy => hy.symm ▸ hpx⟩
#align mv_polynomial.mem_vanishing_ideal_singleton_iff MvPolynomial.mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff
instance vanishingIdeal_singleton_isMaximal {x : σ → k} :
(vanishingIdeal {x} : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)).IsMaximal := by
have : MvPolynomial σ k ⧸ vanishingIdeal {x} ≃+* k :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective
(Ideal.Quotient.lift _ (eval x) fun p h => (mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff x p).mp h)
(by
refine
⟨(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr fun p hp => ?_, fun z =>
⟨(Ideal.Quotient.mk (vanishingIdeal {x} : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k))) (C z), by simp⟩⟩
obtain ⟨q, rfl⟩ := Quotient.mk_surjective p
rwa [Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk, ← mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff,
← Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem] at hp)
rw [← bot_quotient_isMaximal_iff, RingEquiv.bot_maximal_iff this]
exact bot_isMaximal
#align mv_polynomial.vanishing_ideal_singleton_is_maximal MvPolynomial.vanishingIdeal_singleton_isMaximal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Nullstellensatz.lean | 131 | 140 | theorem radical_le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal (MvPolynomial σ k)) :
I.radical ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus I) := by |
intro p hp x hx
rw [← mem_vanishingIdeal_singleton_iff]
rw [radical_eq_sInf] at hp
refine
(mem_sInf.mp hp)
⟨le_trans (le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus I)
(vanishingIdeal_anti_mono fun y hy => hy.symm ▸ hx),
IsMaximal.isPrime' _⟩
| 8 | 2,980.957987 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,425 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.DensityTheorem
#align_import measure_theory.covering.liminf_limsup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5f6e827d81dfbeb6151d7016586ceeb0099b9655"
open Set Filter Metric MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
variable (μ : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] [IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure μ]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/LiminfLimsup.lean | 41 | 150 | theorem blimsup_cthickening_ae_le_of_eventually_mul_le_aux (p : ℕ → Prop) {s : ℕ → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) {r₁ r₂ : ℕ → ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r₁ atTop (𝓝[>] 0)) (hrp : 0 ≤ r₁)
{M : ℝ} (hM : 0 < M) (hM' : M < 1) (hMr : ∀ᶠ i in atTop, M * r₁ i ≤ r₂ i) :
(blimsup (fun i => cthickening (r₁ i) (s i)) atTop p : Set α) ≤ᵐ[μ]
(blimsup (fun i => cthickening (r₂ i) (s i)) atTop p : Set α) := by |
/- Sketch of proof:
Assume that `p` is identically true for simplicity. Let `Y₁ i = cthickening (r₁ i) (s i)`, define
`Y₂` similarly except using `r₂`, and let `(Z i) = ⋃_{j ≥ i} (Y₂ j)`. Our goal is equivalent to
showing that `μ ((limsup Y₁) \ (Z i)) = 0` for all `i`.
Assume for contradiction that `μ ((limsup Y₁) \ (Z i)) ≠ 0` for some `i` and let
`W = (limsup Y₁) \ (Z i)`. Apply Lebesgue's density theorem to obtain a point `d` in `W` of
density `1`. Since `d ∈ limsup Y₁`, there is a subsequence of `j ↦ Y₁ j`, indexed by
`f 0 < f 1 < ...`, such that `d ∈ Y₁ (f j)` for all `j`. For each `j`, we may thus choose
`w j ∈ s (f j)` such that `d ∈ B j`, where `B j = closedBall (w j) (r₁ (f j))`. Note that
since `d` has density one, `μ (W ∩ (B j)) / μ (B j) → 1`.
We obtain our contradiction by showing that there exists `η < 1` such that
`μ (W ∩ (B j)) / μ (B j) ≤ η` for sufficiently large `j`. In fact we claim that `η = 1 - C⁻¹`
is such a value where `C` is the scaling constant of `M⁻¹` for the uniformly locally doubling
measure `μ`.
To prove the claim, let `b j = closedBall (w j) (M * r₁ (f j))` and for given `j` consider the
sets `b j` and `W ∩ (B j)`. These are both subsets of `B j` and are disjoint for large enough `j`
since `M * r₁ j ≤ r₂ j` and thus `b j ⊆ Z i ⊆ Wᶜ`. We thus have:
`μ (b j) + μ (W ∩ (B j)) ≤ μ (B j)`. Combining this with `μ (B j) ≤ C * μ (b j)` we obtain
the required inequality. -/
set Y₁ : ℕ → Set α := fun i => cthickening (r₁ i) (s i)
set Y₂ : ℕ → Set α := fun i => cthickening (r₂ i) (s i)
let Z : ℕ → Set α := fun i => ⋃ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), Y₂ j
suffices ∀ i, μ (atTop.blimsup Y₁ p \ Z i) = 0 by
rwa [ae_le_set, @blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat _ _ _ Y₂, iInf_eq_iInter, diff_iInter,
measure_iUnion_null_iff]
intros i
set W := atTop.blimsup Y₁ p \ Z i
by_contra contra
obtain ⟨d, hd, hd'⟩ : ∃ d, d ∈ W ∧ ∀ {ι : Type _} {l : Filter ι} (w : ι → α) (δ : ι → ℝ),
Tendsto δ l (𝓝[>] 0) → (∀ᶠ j in l, d ∈ closedBall (w j) (2 * δ j)) →
Tendsto (fun j => μ (W ∩ closedBall (w j) (δ j)) / μ (closedBall (w j) (δ j))) l (𝓝 1) :=
Measure.exists_mem_of_measure_ne_zero_of_ae contra
(IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div μ W 2)
replace hd : d ∈ blimsup Y₁ atTop p := ((mem_diff _).mp hd).1
obtain ⟨f : ℕ → ℕ, hf⟩ := exists_forall_mem_of_hasBasis_mem_blimsup' atTop_basis hd
simp only [forall_and] at hf
obtain ⟨hf₀ : ∀ j, d ∈ cthickening (r₁ (f j)) (s (f j)), hf₁, hf₂ : ∀ j, j ≤ f j⟩ := hf
have hf₃ : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_atTop.mpr fun j => ⟨f j, fun i hi => (hf₂ j).trans (hi.trans <| hf₂ i)⟩
replace hr : Tendsto (r₁ ∘ f) atTop (𝓝[>] 0) := hr.comp hf₃
replace hMr : ∀ᶠ j in atTop, M * r₁ (f j) ≤ r₂ (f j) := hf₃.eventually hMr
replace hf₀ : ∀ j, ∃ w ∈ s (f j), d ∈ closedBall w (2 * r₁ (f j)) := by
intro j
specialize hrp (f j)
rw [Pi.zero_apply] at hrp
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hrp with (hr0 | hrp')
· specialize hf₀ j
rw [← hr0, cthickening_zero, (hs (f j)).closure_eq] at hf₀
exact ⟨d, hf₀, by simp [← hr0]⟩
· simpa using mem_iUnion₂.mp (cthickening_subset_iUnion_closedBall_of_lt (s (f j))
(by positivity) (lt_two_mul_self hrp') (hf₀ j))
choose w hw hw' using hf₀
let C := IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.scalingConstantOf μ M⁻¹
have hC : 0 < C :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.one_le_scalingConstantOf μ M⁻¹)
suffices ∃ η < (1 : ℝ≥0),
∀ᶠ j in atTop, μ (W ∩ closedBall (w j) (r₁ (f j))) / μ (closedBall (w j) (r₁ (f j))) ≤ η by
obtain ⟨η, hη, hη'⟩ := this
replace hη' : 1 ≤ η := by
simpa only [ENNReal.one_le_coe_iff] using
le_of_tendsto (hd' w (fun j => r₁ (f j)) hr <| eventually_of_forall hw') hη'
exact (lt_self_iff_false _).mp (lt_of_lt_of_le hη hη')
refine ⟨1 - C⁻¹, tsub_lt_self zero_lt_one (inv_pos.mpr hC), ?_⟩
replace hC : C ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hC
let b : ℕ → Set α := fun j => closedBall (w j) (M * r₁ (f j))
let B : ℕ → Set α := fun j => closedBall (w j) (r₁ (f j))
have h₁ : ∀ j, b j ⊆ B j := fun j =>
closedBall_subset_closedBall (mul_le_of_le_one_left (hrp (f j)) hM'.le)
have h₂ : ∀ j, W ∩ B j ⊆ B j := fun j => inter_subset_right
have h₃ : ∀ᶠ j in atTop, Disjoint (b j) (W ∩ B j) := by
apply hMr.mp
rw [eventually_atTop]
refine
⟨i, fun j hj hj' => Disjoint.inf_right (B j) <| Disjoint.inf_right' (blimsup Y₁ atTop p) ?_⟩
change Disjoint (b j) (Z i)ᶜ
rw [disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset]
refine (closedBall_subset_cthickening (hw j) (M * r₁ (f j))).trans
((cthickening_mono hj' _).trans fun a ha => ?_)
simp only [Z, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact ⟨f j, ⟨hf₁ j, hj.le.trans (hf₂ j)⟩, ha⟩
have h₄ : ∀ᶠ j in atTop, μ (B j) ≤ C * μ (b j) :=
(hr.eventually (IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.eventually_measure_le_scaling_constant_mul'
μ M hM)).mono fun j hj => hj (w j)
refine (h₃.and h₄).mono fun j hj₀ => ?_
change μ (W ∩ B j) / μ (B j) ≤ ↑(1 - C⁻¹)
rcases eq_or_ne (μ (B j)) ∞ with (hB | hB); · simp [hB]
apply ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
rw [ENNReal.coe_sub, ENNReal.coe_one, ENNReal.sub_mul fun _ _ => hB, one_mul]
replace hB : ↑C⁻¹ * μ (B j) ≠ ∞ := by
refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top ?_ hB
rwa [ENNReal.coe_inv hC, Ne, ENNReal.inv_eq_top, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
obtain ⟨hj₁ : Disjoint (b j) (W ∩ B j), hj₂ : μ (B j) ≤ C * μ (b j)⟩ := hj₀
replace hj₂ : ↑C⁻¹ * μ (B j) ≤ μ (b j) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_inv hC, ← ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul' hj₂
have hj₃ : ↑C⁻¹ * μ (B j) + μ (W ∩ B j) ≤ μ (B j) := by
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right hj₂ _) ?_
rw [← measure_union' hj₁ measurableSet_closedBall]
exact measure_mono (union_subset (h₁ j) (h₂ j))
replace hj₃ := tsub_le_tsub_right hj₃ (↑C⁻¹ * μ (B j))
rwa [ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hB] at hj₃
| 101 | 73,070,599,793,680,670,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,426 |
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
namespace Subgraph
protected structure Preconnected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Preconnected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Preconnected H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨Preconnected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Preconnected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma preconnected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Preconnected ↔ H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected structure Connected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Connected
#align simple_graph.subgraph.connected SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Connected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Connected H.coe.Connected := ⟨Connected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Connected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma connected_iff' {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.coe.Connected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected lemma connected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.Preconnected ∧ H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff', connected_iff, H.preconnected_iff, Set.nonempty_coe_sort]
protected lemma Connected.preconnected {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.Preconnected := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.1
protected lemma Connected.nonempty {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.2
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity/Subgraph.lean | 64 | 69 | theorem singletonSubgraph_connected {v : V} : (G.singletonSubgraph v).Connected := by |
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
subst_vars
rfl
| 5 | 148.413159 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,427 |
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
namespace Subgraph
protected structure Preconnected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Preconnected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Preconnected H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨Preconnected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Preconnected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma preconnected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Preconnected ↔ H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected structure Connected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Connected
#align simple_graph.subgraph.connected SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Connected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Connected H.coe.Connected := ⟨Connected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Connected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma connected_iff' {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.coe.Connected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected lemma connected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.Preconnected ∧ H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff', connected_iff, H.preconnected_iff, Set.nonempty_coe_sort]
protected lemma Connected.preconnected {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.Preconnected := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.1
protected lemma Connected.nonempty {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.2
theorem singletonSubgraph_connected {v : V} : (G.singletonSubgraph v).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.singleton_subgraph_connected SimpleGraph.Subgraph.singletonSubgraph_connected
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity/Subgraph.lean | 73 | 78 | theorem subgraphOfAdj_connected {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).Connected := by |
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
obtain rfl | rfl := ha <;> obtain rfl | rfl := hb <;>
first | rfl | (apply Adj.reachable; simp)
| 5 | 148.413159 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,427 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.ae_measurable_order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
open MeasureTheory Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
open ENNReal NNReal
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEMeasurableOrder.lean | 34 | 107 | theorem MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets {α : Type*}
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {β : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder β] [DenselyOrdered β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] [SecondCountableTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] (s : Set β) (s_count : s.Countable) (s_dense : Dense s) (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ p ∈ s, ∀ q ∈ s, p < q → ∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | q < f x } ⊆ v ∧ μ (u ∩ v) = 0) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by |
haveI : Encodable s := s_count.toEncodable
have h' : ∀ p q, ∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | q < f x } ⊆ v ∧ (p ∈ s → q ∈ s → p < q → μ (u ∩ v) = 0) := by
intro p q
by_cases H : p ∈ s ∧ q ∈ s ∧ p < q
· rcases h p H.1 q H.2.1 H.2.2 with ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h'u, h'v, hμ⟩
exact ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h'u, h'v, fun _ _ _ => hμ⟩
· refine
⟨univ, univ, MeasurableSet.univ, MeasurableSet.univ, subset_univ _, subset_univ _,
fun ps qs pq => ?_⟩
simp only [not_and] at H
exact (H ps qs pq).elim
choose! u v huv using h'
let u' : β → Set α := fun p => ⋂ q ∈ s ∩ Ioi p, u p q
have u'_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (u' i) := by
intro i
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (s_count.mono inter_subset_left) fun b _ => (huv i b).1
let f' : α → β := fun x => ⨅ i : s, piecewise (u' i) (fun _ => (i : β)) (fun _ => (⊤ : β)) x
have f'_meas : Measurable f' := by
apply measurable_iInf
exact fun i => Measurable.piecewise (u'_meas i) measurable_const measurable_const
let t := ⋃ (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), u' p ∩ v p q
have μt : μ t ≤ 0 :=
calc
μ t ≤ ∑' (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), μ (u' p ∩ v p q) := by
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).trans ?_
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun p => ?_
haveI := (s_count.mono (s.inter_subset_left (t := Ioi ↑p))).to_subtype
apply measure_iUnion_le
_ ≤ ∑' (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), μ (u p q ∩ v p q) := by
gcongr with p q
exact biInter_subset_of_mem q.2
_ = ∑' (p : s) (_ : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
congr
ext1 p
congr
ext1 q
exact (huv p q).2.2.2.2 p.2 q.2.1 q.2.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero]
have ff' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x = f' x := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := by
have : μ t = 0 := le_antisymm μt bot_le
change μ _ = 0
convert this
ext y
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_not_mem]
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
apply (iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt _ _).symm
· intro i
by_cases H : x ∈ u' i
swap
· simp only [H, le_top, not_false_iff, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
simp only [H, piecewise_eq_of_mem]
contrapose! hx
obtain ⟨r, ⟨xr, rq⟩, rs⟩ : ∃ r, r ∈ Ioo (i : β) (f x) ∩ s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.1 s_dense (Ioo i (f x)) isOpen_Ioo (nonempty_Ioo.2 hx)
have A : x ∈ v i r := (huv i r).2.2.2.1 rq
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ?_⟩
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨r, ⟨rs, xr⟩⟩, ?_⟩
exact ⟨H, A⟩
· intro q hq
obtain ⟨r, ⟨xr, rq⟩, rs⟩ : ∃ r, r ∈ Ioo (f x) q ∩ s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.1 s_dense (Ioo (f x) q) isOpen_Ioo (nonempty_Ioo.2 hq)
refine ⟨⟨r, rs⟩, ?_⟩
have A : x ∈ u' r := mem_biInter fun i _ => (huv r i).2.2.1 xr
simp only [A, rq, piecewise_eq_of_mem, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact ⟨f', f'_meas, ff'⟩
| 67 | 125,236,317,084,221,370,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,428 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.ae_measurable_order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
open MeasureTheory Set TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
open ENNReal NNReal
theorem MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets {α : Type*}
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {β : Type*} [CompleteLinearOrder β] [DenselyOrdered β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [OrderTopology β] [SecondCountableTopology β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] (s : Set β) (s_count : s.Countable) (s_dense : Dense s) (f : α → β)
(h : ∀ p ∈ s, ∀ q ∈ s, p < q → ∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | q < f x } ⊆ v ∧ μ (u ∩ v) = 0) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : Encodable s := s_count.toEncodable
have h' : ∀ p q, ∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | q < f x } ⊆ v ∧ (p ∈ s → q ∈ s → p < q → μ (u ∩ v) = 0) := by
intro p q
by_cases H : p ∈ s ∧ q ∈ s ∧ p < q
· rcases h p H.1 q H.2.1 H.2.2 with ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h'u, h'v, hμ⟩
exact ⟨u, v, hu, hv, h'u, h'v, fun _ _ _ => hμ⟩
· refine
⟨univ, univ, MeasurableSet.univ, MeasurableSet.univ, subset_univ _, subset_univ _,
fun ps qs pq => ?_⟩
simp only [not_and] at H
exact (H ps qs pq).elim
choose! u v huv using h'
let u' : β → Set α := fun p => ⋂ q ∈ s ∩ Ioi p, u p q
have u'_meas : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (u' i) := by
intro i
exact MeasurableSet.biInter (s_count.mono inter_subset_left) fun b _ => (huv i b).1
let f' : α → β := fun x => ⨅ i : s, piecewise (u' i) (fun _ => (i : β)) (fun _ => (⊤ : β)) x
have f'_meas : Measurable f' := by
apply measurable_iInf
exact fun i => Measurable.piecewise (u'_meas i) measurable_const measurable_const
let t := ⋃ (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), u' p ∩ v p q
have μt : μ t ≤ 0 :=
calc
μ t ≤ ∑' (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), μ (u' p ∩ v p q) := by
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).trans ?_
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun p => ?_
haveI := (s_count.mono (s.inter_subset_left (t := Ioi ↑p))).to_subtype
apply measure_iUnion_le
_ ≤ ∑' (p : s) (q : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), μ (u p q ∩ v p q) := by
gcongr with p q
exact biInter_subset_of_mem q.2
_ = ∑' (p : s) (_ : ↥(s ∩ Ioi p)), (0 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
congr
ext1 p
congr
ext1 q
exact (huv p q).2.2.2.2 p.2 q.2.1 q.2.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero]
have ff' : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x = f' x := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := by
have : μ t = 0 := le_antisymm μt bot_le
change μ _ = 0
convert this
ext y
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_not_mem]
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
apply (iInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt _ _).symm
· intro i
by_cases H : x ∈ u' i
swap
· simp only [H, le_top, not_false_iff, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem]
simp only [H, piecewise_eq_of_mem]
contrapose! hx
obtain ⟨r, ⟨xr, rq⟩, rs⟩ : ∃ r, r ∈ Ioo (i : β) (f x) ∩ s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.1 s_dense (Ioo i (f x)) isOpen_Ioo (nonempty_Ioo.2 hx)
have A : x ∈ v i r := (huv i r).2.2.2.1 rq
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ?_⟩
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨r, ⟨rs, xr⟩⟩, ?_⟩
exact ⟨H, A⟩
· intro q hq
obtain ⟨r, ⟨xr, rq⟩, rs⟩ : ∃ r, r ∈ Ioo (f x) q ∩ s :=
dense_iff_inter_open.1 s_dense (Ioo (f x) q) isOpen_Ioo (nonempty_Ioo.2 hq)
refine ⟨⟨r, rs⟩, ?_⟩
have A : x ∈ u' r := mem_biInter fun i _ => (huv r i).2.2.1 xr
simp only [A, rq, piecewise_eq_of_mem, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact ⟨f', f'_meas, ff'⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_measurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/AEMeasurableOrder.lean | 113 | 127 | theorem ENNReal.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ (p : ℝ≥0) (q : ℝ≥0), p < q →
∃ u v, MeasurableSet u ∧ MeasurableSet v ∧
{ x | f x < p } ⊆ u ∧ { x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < f x } ⊆ v ∧ μ (u ∩ v) = 0) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by |
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, _, s_top⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s :=
ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
have I : ∀ x ∈ s, x ≠ ∞ := fun x xs hx => s_top (hx ▸ xs)
apply MeasureTheory.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets μ s s_count s_dense _
rintro p hp q hq hpq
lift p to ℝ≥0 using I p hp
lift q to ℝ≥0 using I q hq
exact h p q (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 hpq)
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,428 |
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.free_module.finite.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59628387770d82eb6f6dd7b7107308aa2509ec95"
universe u v w
variable (R : Type u) (M : Type v) (N : Type w)
namespace Module.Free
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Free R M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [Module.Free R N]
variable {R}
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/FreeModule/Finite/Basic.lean | 53 | 58 | theorem _root_.Module.Finite.of_basis {R M ι : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[_root_.Finite ι] (b : Basis ι R M) : Module.Finite R M := by |
cases nonempty_fintype ι
classical
refine ⟨⟨Finset.univ.image b, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [Set.image_univ, Finset.coe_univ, Finset.coe_image, Basis.span_eq]
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,429 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 43 | 58 | theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by |
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
| 15 | 3,269,017.372472 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
#align cardinal.is_unit_iff Cardinal.isUnit_iff
instance : Unique Cardinal.{u}ˣ where
default := 1
uniq a := Units.val_eq_one.mp <| isUnit_iff.mp a.isUnit
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Cardinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a, x, b0, ⟨b, hab⟩ => by
simpa only [hab, mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => b0 (by rwa [h, mul_zero] at hab)) a
#align cardinal.le_of_dvd Cardinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a ≤ b) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b, (mul_eq_right hb h ha).symm⟩
#align cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 76 | 89 | theorem prime_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : Prime a := by |
refine ⟨(aleph0_pos.trans_le ha).ne', ?_, fun b c hbc => ?_⟩
· rw [isUnit_iff]
exact (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne'
rcases eq_or_ne (b * c) 0 with hz | hz
· rcases mul_eq_zero.mp hz with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
wlog h : c ≤ b
· cases le_total c b <;> [solve_by_elim; rw [or_comm]]
apply_assumption
assumption'
all_goals rwa [mul_comm]
left
have habc := le_of_dvd hz hbc
rwa [mul_eq_max' <| ha.trans <| habc, max_def', if_pos h] at hbc
| 13 | 442,413.392009 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
#align cardinal.is_unit_iff Cardinal.isUnit_iff
instance : Unique Cardinal.{u}ˣ where
default := 1
uniq a := Units.val_eq_one.mp <| isUnit_iff.mp a.isUnit
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Cardinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a, x, b0, ⟨b, hab⟩ => by
simpa only [hab, mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => b0 (by rwa [h, mul_zero] at hab)) a
#align cardinal.le_of_dvd Cardinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a ≤ b) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b, (mul_eq_right hb h ha).symm⟩
#align cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le
@[simp]
theorem prime_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : Prime a := by
refine ⟨(aleph0_pos.trans_le ha).ne', ?_, fun b c hbc => ?_⟩
· rw [isUnit_iff]
exact (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne'
rcases eq_or_ne (b * c) 0 with hz | hz
· rcases mul_eq_zero.mp hz with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
wlog h : c ≤ b
· cases le_total c b <;> [solve_by_elim; rw [or_comm]]
apply_assumption
assumption'
all_goals rwa [mul_comm]
left
have habc := le_of_dvd hz hbc
rwa [mul_eq_max' <| ha.trans <| habc, max_def', if_pos h] at hbc
#align cardinal.prime_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.prime_of_aleph0_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 92 | 96 | theorem not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : ¬Irreducible a := by |
rw [irreducible_iff, not_and_or]
refine Or.inr fun h => ?_
simpa [mul_aleph0_eq ha, isUnit_iff, (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne', one_lt_aleph0.ne'] using
h a ℵ₀
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
#align cardinal.is_unit_iff Cardinal.isUnit_iff
instance : Unique Cardinal.{u}ˣ where
default := 1
uniq a := Units.val_eq_one.mp <| isUnit_iff.mp a.isUnit
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Cardinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a, x, b0, ⟨b, hab⟩ => by
simpa only [hab, mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => b0 (by rwa [h, mul_zero] at hab)) a
#align cardinal.le_of_dvd Cardinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a ≤ b) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b, (mul_eq_right hb h ha).symm⟩
#align cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le
@[simp]
theorem prime_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : Prime a := by
refine ⟨(aleph0_pos.trans_le ha).ne', ?_, fun b c hbc => ?_⟩
· rw [isUnit_iff]
exact (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne'
rcases eq_or_ne (b * c) 0 with hz | hz
· rcases mul_eq_zero.mp hz with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
wlog h : c ≤ b
· cases le_total c b <;> [solve_by_elim; rw [or_comm]]
apply_assumption
assumption'
all_goals rwa [mul_comm]
left
have habc := le_of_dvd hz hbc
rwa [mul_eq_max' <| ha.trans <| habc, max_def', if_pos h] at hbc
#align cardinal.prime_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.prime_of_aleph0_le
theorem not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : ¬Irreducible a := by
rw [irreducible_iff, not_and_or]
refine Or.inr fun h => ?_
simpa [mul_aleph0_eq ha, isUnit_iff, (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne', one_lt_aleph0.ne'] using
h a ℵ₀
#align cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 100 | 108 | theorem nat_coe_dvd_iff : (n : Cardinal) ∣ m ↔ n ∣ m := by |
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨h, ht⟩ => ⟨h, mod_cast ht⟩⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ↑m < ℵ₀ := nat_lt_aleph0 m
rw [hk, mul_lt_aleph0_iff] at this
rcases this with (h | h | ⟨-, hk'⟩)
iterate 2 simp only [h, mul_zero, zero_mul, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at hk; simp [hk]
lift k to ℕ using hk'
exact ⟨k, mod_cast hk⟩
| 8 | 2,980.957987 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
#align cardinal.is_unit_iff Cardinal.isUnit_iff
instance : Unique Cardinal.{u}ˣ where
default := 1
uniq a := Units.val_eq_one.mp <| isUnit_iff.mp a.isUnit
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Cardinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a, x, b0, ⟨b, hab⟩ => by
simpa only [hab, mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => b0 (by rwa [h, mul_zero] at hab)) a
#align cardinal.le_of_dvd Cardinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a ≤ b) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b, (mul_eq_right hb h ha).symm⟩
#align cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le
@[simp]
theorem prime_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : Prime a := by
refine ⟨(aleph0_pos.trans_le ha).ne', ?_, fun b c hbc => ?_⟩
· rw [isUnit_iff]
exact (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne'
rcases eq_or_ne (b * c) 0 with hz | hz
· rcases mul_eq_zero.mp hz with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
wlog h : c ≤ b
· cases le_total c b <;> [solve_by_elim; rw [or_comm]]
apply_assumption
assumption'
all_goals rwa [mul_comm]
left
have habc := le_of_dvd hz hbc
rwa [mul_eq_max' <| ha.trans <| habc, max_def', if_pos h] at hbc
#align cardinal.prime_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.prime_of_aleph0_le
theorem not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : ¬Irreducible a := by
rw [irreducible_iff, not_and_or]
refine Or.inr fun h => ?_
simpa [mul_aleph0_eq ha, isUnit_iff, (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne', one_lt_aleph0.ne'] using
h a ℵ₀
#align cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nat_coe_dvd_iff : (n : Cardinal) ∣ m ↔ n ∣ m := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨h, ht⟩ => ⟨h, mod_cast ht⟩⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ↑m < ℵ₀ := nat_lt_aleph0 m
rw [hk, mul_lt_aleph0_iff] at this
rcases this with (h | h | ⟨-, hk'⟩)
iterate 2 simp only [h, mul_zero, zero_mul, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at hk; simp [hk]
lift k to ℕ using hk'
exact ⟨k, mod_cast hk⟩
#align cardinal.nat_coe_dvd_iff Cardinal.nat_coe_dvd_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 112 | 134 | theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by |
simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
refine and_congr (by simp) (and_congr ?_ ⟨fun h b c hbc => ?_, fun h b c hbc => ?_⟩)
· simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
· exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
· rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
· simp
· simp
lift b to ℕ using hb
lift c to ℕ using hc
exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
cases hbc <;> contradiction
wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
apply (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try assumption
· rwa [mul_comm] at hbc
· rwa [mul_comm] at h'
· exact Or.inl (dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le hn ((nat_lt_aleph0 n).le.trans hℵ₀b) hℵ₀b)
| 22 | 3,584,912,846.131591 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
#align cardinal.is_unit_iff Cardinal.isUnit_iff
instance : Unique Cardinal.{u}ˣ where
default := 1
uniq a := Units.val_eq_one.mp <| isUnit_iff.mp a.isUnit
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Cardinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a, x, b0, ⟨b, hab⟩ => by
simpa only [hab, mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => b0 (by rwa [h, mul_zero] at hab)) a
#align cardinal.le_of_dvd Cardinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a ≤ b) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b, (mul_eq_right hb h ha).symm⟩
#align cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le
@[simp]
theorem prime_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : Prime a := by
refine ⟨(aleph0_pos.trans_le ha).ne', ?_, fun b c hbc => ?_⟩
· rw [isUnit_iff]
exact (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne'
rcases eq_or_ne (b * c) 0 with hz | hz
· rcases mul_eq_zero.mp hz with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
wlog h : c ≤ b
· cases le_total c b <;> [solve_by_elim; rw [or_comm]]
apply_assumption
assumption'
all_goals rwa [mul_comm]
left
have habc := le_of_dvd hz hbc
rwa [mul_eq_max' <| ha.trans <| habc, max_def', if_pos h] at hbc
#align cardinal.prime_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.prime_of_aleph0_le
theorem not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : ¬Irreducible a := by
rw [irreducible_iff, not_and_or]
refine Or.inr fun h => ?_
simpa [mul_aleph0_eq ha, isUnit_iff, (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne', one_lt_aleph0.ne'] using
h a ℵ₀
#align cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nat_coe_dvd_iff : (n : Cardinal) ∣ m ↔ n ∣ m := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨h, ht⟩ => ⟨h, mod_cast ht⟩⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ↑m < ℵ₀ := nat_lt_aleph0 m
rw [hk, mul_lt_aleph0_iff] at this
rcases this with (h | h | ⟨-, hk'⟩)
iterate 2 simp only [h, mul_zero, zero_mul, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at hk; simp [hk]
lift k to ℕ using hk'
exact ⟨k, mod_cast hk⟩
#align cardinal.nat_coe_dvd_iff Cardinal.nat_coe_dvd_iff
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
refine and_congr (by simp) (and_congr ?_ ⟨fun h b c hbc => ?_, fun h b c hbc => ?_⟩)
· simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
· exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
· rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
· simp
· simp
lift b to ℕ using hb
lift c to ℕ using hc
exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
cases hbc <;> contradiction
wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
apply (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try assumption
· rwa [mul_comm] at hbc
· rwa [mul_comm] at h'
· exact Or.inl (dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le hn ((nat_lt_aleph0 n).le.trans hℵ₀b) hℵ₀b)
#align cardinal.nat_is_prime_iff Cardinal.nat_is_prime_iff
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 137 | 141 | theorem is_prime_iff {a : Cardinal} : Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p : ℕ, a = p ∧ p.Prime := by |
rcases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with h | h
· simp [h]
lift a to ℕ using id h
simp [not_le.mpr h]
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.IsPrimePow
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.Tactic.WLOG
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.divisibility from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ea050b44c0f9aba9d16a948c7cc7d2e7c8493567"
namespace Cardinal
open Cardinal
universe u
variable {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n m : ℕ}
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_iff : IsUnit a ↔ a = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h => ?_, by
rintro rfl
exact isUnit_one⟩
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact (not_isUnit_zero h).elim
rw [isUnit_iff_forall_dvd] at h
cases' h 1 with t ht
rw [eq_comm, mul_eq_one_iff'] at ht
· exact ht.1
· exact one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr ha
· apply one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr
intro h
rw [h, mul_zero] at ht
exact zero_ne_one ht
#align cardinal.is_unit_iff Cardinal.isUnit_iff
instance : Unique Cardinal.{u}ˣ where
default := 1
uniq a := Units.val_eq_one.mp <| isUnit_iff.mp a.isUnit
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Cardinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
| a, x, b0, ⟨b, hab⟩ => by
simpa only [hab, mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => b0 (by rwa [h, mul_zero] at hab)) a
#align cardinal.le_of_dvd Cardinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : a ≤ b) (hb : ℵ₀ ≤ b) : a ∣ b :=
⟨b, (mul_eq_right hb h ha).symm⟩
#align cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le
@[simp]
theorem prime_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : Prime a := by
refine ⟨(aleph0_pos.trans_le ha).ne', ?_, fun b c hbc => ?_⟩
· rw [isUnit_iff]
exact (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne'
rcases eq_or_ne (b * c) 0 with hz | hz
· rcases mul_eq_zero.mp hz with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
wlog h : c ≤ b
· cases le_total c b <;> [solve_by_elim; rw [or_comm]]
apply_assumption
assumption'
all_goals rwa [mul_comm]
left
have habc := le_of_dvd hz hbc
rwa [mul_eq_max' <| ha.trans <| habc, max_def', if_pos h] at hbc
#align cardinal.prime_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.prime_of_aleph0_le
theorem not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le (ha : ℵ₀ ≤ a) : ¬Irreducible a := by
rw [irreducible_iff, not_and_or]
refine Or.inr fun h => ?_
simpa [mul_aleph0_eq ha, isUnit_iff, (one_lt_aleph0.trans_le ha).ne', one_lt_aleph0.ne'] using
h a ℵ₀
#align cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.not_irreducible_of_aleph0_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nat_coe_dvd_iff : (n : Cardinal) ∣ m ↔ n ∣ m := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨h, ht⟩ => ⟨h, mod_cast ht⟩⟩
rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ↑m < ℵ₀ := nat_lt_aleph0 m
rw [hk, mul_lt_aleph0_iff] at this
rcases this with (h | h | ⟨-, hk'⟩)
iterate 2 simp only [h, mul_zero, zero_mul, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at hk; simp [hk]
lift k to ℕ using hk'
exact ⟨k, mod_cast hk⟩
#align cardinal.nat_coe_dvd_iff Cardinal.nat_coe_dvd_iff
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
refine and_congr (by simp) (and_congr ?_ ⟨fun h b c hbc => ?_, fun h b c hbc => ?_⟩)
· simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
· exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
· rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
· simp
· simp
lift b to ℕ using hb
lift c to ℕ using hc
exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
cases hbc <;> contradiction
wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
apply (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try assumption
· rwa [mul_comm] at hbc
· rwa [mul_comm] at h'
· exact Or.inl (dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le hn ((nat_lt_aleph0 n).le.trans hℵ₀b) hℵ₀b)
#align cardinal.nat_is_prime_iff Cardinal.nat_is_prime_iff
theorem is_prime_iff {a : Cardinal} : Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p : ℕ, a = p ∧ p.Prime := by
rcases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with h | h
· simp [h]
lift a to ℕ using id h
simp [not_le.mpr h]
#align cardinal.is_prime_iff Cardinal.is_prime_iff
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Divisibility.lean | 144 | 158 | theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by |
by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
· simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
lift a to ℕ using not_le.mp h
rw [isPrimePow_def]
refine
⟨?_, fun ⟨n, han, p, k, hp, hk, h⟩ =>
⟨p, k, nat_is_prime_iff.2 hp, hk, by rw [han]; exact mod_cast h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨p, k, hp, hk, hpk⟩
have key : p ^ (1 : Cardinal) ≤ ↑a := by
rw [← hpk]; apply power_le_power_left hp.ne_zero; exact mod_cast hk
rw [power_one] at key
lift p to ℕ using key.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 a)
exact ⟨a, rfl, p, k, nat_is_prime_iff.mp hp, hk, mod_cast hpk⟩
| 14 | 1,202,604.284165 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 2,430 |
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
#align_import order.disjointed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
variable {α β : Type*}
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
def disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α
| 0 => f 0
| n + 1 => f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n
#align disjointed disjointed
@[simp]
theorem disjointed_zero (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f 0 = f 0 :=
rfl
#align disjointed_zero disjointed_zero
theorem disjointed_succ (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n :=
rfl
#align disjointed_succ disjointed_succ
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 63 | 67 | theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ℕ → α) → ℕ → α) := by |
rintro f n
cases n
· rfl
· exact sdiff_le
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,431 |
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
#align_import order.disjointed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
variable {α β : Type*}
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
def disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α
| 0 => f 0
| n + 1 => f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n
#align disjointed disjointed
@[simp]
theorem disjointed_zero (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f 0 = f 0 :=
rfl
#align disjointed_zero disjointed_zero
theorem disjointed_succ (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n :=
rfl
#align disjointed_succ disjointed_succ
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ℕ → α) → ℕ → α) := by
rintro f n
cases n
· rfl
· exact sdiff_le
#align disjointed_le_id disjointed_le_id
theorem disjointed_le (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
#align disjointed_le disjointed_le
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 74 | 80 | theorem disjoint_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : Pairwise (Disjoint on disjointed f) := by |
refine (Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm _).2 fun m n h => ?_
cases n
· exact (Nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
exact
disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left
((disjointed_le f m).trans (le_partialSups_of_le f (Nat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h)))
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,431 |
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
#align_import order.disjointed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
variable {α β : Type*}
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
def disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α
| 0 => f 0
| n + 1 => f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n
#align disjointed disjointed
@[simp]
theorem disjointed_zero (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f 0 = f 0 :=
rfl
#align disjointed_zero disjointed_zero
theorem disjointed_succ (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n :=
rfl
#align disjointed_succ disjointed_succ
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ℕ → α) → ℕ → α) := by
rintro f n
cases n
· rfl
· exact sdiff_le
#align disjointed_le_id disjointed_le_id
theorem disjointed_le (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
#align disjointed_le disjointed_le
theorem disjoint_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : Pairwise (Disjoint on disjointed f) := by
refine (Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm _).2 fun m n h => ?_
cases n
· exact (Nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
exact
disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left
((disjointed_le f m).trans (le_partialSups_of_le f (Nat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h)))
#align disjoint_disjointed disjoint_disjointed
-- Porting note: `disjointedRec` had a change in universe level.
def disjointedRec {f : ℕ → α} {p : α → Sort*} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i)) :
∀ ⦃n⦄, p (f n) → p (disjointed f n)
| 0 => id
| n + 1 => fun h => by
suffices H : ∀ k, p (f (n + 1) \ partialSups f k) from H n
rintro k
induction' k with k ih
· exact hdiff h
rw [partialSups_succ, ← sdiff_sdiff_left]
exact hdiff ih
#align disjointed_rec disjointedRec
@[simp]
theorem disjointedRec_zero {f : ℕ → α} {p : α → Sort*} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i))
(h₀ : p (f 0)) : disjointedRec hdiff h₀ = h₀ :=
rfl
#align disjointed_rec_zero disjointedRec_zero
-- TODO: Find a useful statement of `disjointedRec_succ`.
protected lemma Monotone.disjointed_succ {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ f n := by rw [disjointed_succ, hf.partialSups_eq]
#align monotone.disjointed_eq Monotone.disjointed_succ
protected lemma Monotone.disjointed_succ_sup {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
disjointed f (n + 1) ⊔ f n = f (n + 1) := by
rw [hf.disjointed_succ, sdiff_sup_cancel]; exact hf n.le_succ
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 114 | 118 | theorem partialSups_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : partialSups (disjointed f) = partialSups f := by |
ext n
induction' n with k ih
· rw [partialSups_zero, partialSups_zero, disjointed_zero]
· rw [partialSups_succ, partialSups_succ, disjointed_succ, ih, sup_sdiff_self_right]
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,431 |
import Mathlib.Order.PartialSups
#align_import order.disjointed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
variable {α β : Type*}
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
def disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : ℕ → α
| 0 => f 0
| n + 1 => f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n
#align disjointed disjointed
@[simp]
theorem disjointed_zero (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f 0 = f 0 :=
rfl
#align disjointed_zero disjointed_zero
theorem disjointed_succ (f : ℕ → α) (n : ℕ) : disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ partialSups f n :=
rfl
#align disjointed_succ disjointed_succ
theorem disjointed_le_id : disjointed ≤ (id : (ℕ → α) → ℕ → α) := by
rintro f n
cases n
· rfl
· exact sdiff_le
#align disjointed_le_id disjointed_le_id
theorem disjointed_le (f : ℕ → α) : disjointed f ≤ f :=
disjointed_le_id f
#align disjointed_le disjointed_le
theorem disjoint_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : Pairwise (Disjoint on disjointed f) := by
refine (Symmetric.pairwise_on Disjoint.symm _).2 fun m n h => ?_
cases n
· exact (Nat.not_lt_zero _ h).elim
exact
disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left
((disjointed_le f m).trans (le_partialSups_of_le f (Nat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h)))
#align disjoint_disjointed disjoint_disjointed
-- Porting note: `disjointedRec` had a change in universe level.
def disjointedRec {f : ℕ → α} {p : α → Sort*} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i)) :
∀ ⦃n⦄, p (f n) → p (disjointed f n)
| 0 => id
| n + 1 => fun h => by
suffices H : ∀ k, p (f (n + 1) \ partialSups f k) from H n
rintro k
induction' k with k ih
· exact hdiff h
rw [partialSups_succ, ← sdiff_sdiff_left]
exact hdiff ih
#align disjointed_rec disjointedRec
@[simp]
theorem disjointedRec_zero {f : ℕ → α} {p : α → Sort*} (hdiff : ∀ ⦃t i⦄, p t → p (t \ f i))
(h₀ : p (f 0)) : disjointedRec hdiff h₀ = h₀ :=
rfl
#align disjointed_rec_zero disjointedRec_zero
-- TODO: Find a useful statement of `disjointedRec_succ`.
protected lemma Monotone.disjointed_succ {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
disjointed f (n + 1) = f (n + 1) \ f n := by rw [disjointed_succ, hf.partialSups_eq]
#align monotone.disjointed_eq Monotone.disjointed_succ
protected lemma Monotone.disjointed_succ_sup {f : ℕ → α} (hf : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
disjointed f (n + 1) ⊔ f n = f (n + 1) := by
rw [hf.disjointed_succ, sdiff_sup_cancel]; exact hf n.le_succ
@[simp]
theorem partialSups_disjointed (f : ℕ → α) : partialSups (disjointed f) = partialSups f := by
ext n
induction' n with k ih
· rw [partialSups_zero, partialSups_zero, disjointed_zero]
· rw [partialSups_succ, partialSups_succ, disjointed_succ, ih, sup_sdiff_self_right]
#align partial_sups_disjointed partialSups_disjointed
| Mathlib/Order/Disjointed.lean | 123 | 136 | theorem disjointed_unique {f d : ℕ → α} (hdisj : Pairwise (Disjoint on d))
(hsups : partialSups d = partialSups f) : d = disjointed f := by |
ext n
cases' n with n
· rw [← partialSups_zero d, hsups, partialSups_zero, disjointed_zero]
suffices h : d n.succ = partialSups d n.succ \ partialSups d n by
rw [h, hsups, partialSups_succ, disjointed_succ, sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
rw [partialSups_succ, sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, eq_comm, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint]
suffices h : ∀ m ≤ n, Disjoint (partialSups d m) (d n.succ) from h n le_rfl
rintro m hm
induction' m with m ih
· exact hdisj (Nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm
rw [partialSups_succ, disjoint_iff, inf_sup_right, sup_eq_bot_iff, ← disjoint_iff, ← disjoint_iff]
exact ⟨ih (Nat.le_of_succ_le hm), hdisj (Nat.lt_succ_of_le hm).ne⟩
| 12 | 162,754.791419 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,431 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
#align_import field_theory.primitive_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
section PrimitiveElementFinite
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] (E : Type*) [Field E] [Algebra F E]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 56 | 67 | theorem exists_primitive_element_of_finite_top [Finite E] : ∃ α : E, F⟮α⟯ = ⊤ := by |
obtain ⟨α, hα⟩ := @IsCyclic.exists_generator Eˣ _ _
use α
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rw [hx]
exact F⟮α.val⟯.zero_mem
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Set.mem_range.mp (hα (Units.mk0 x hx))
simp only at hn
rw [show x = α ^ n by norm_cast; rw [hn, Units.val_mk0]]
exact zpow_mem (mem_adjoin_simple_self F (E := E) ↑α) n
| 11 | 59,874.141715 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,432 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
#align_import field_theory.primitive_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
section PrimitiveElementInf
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] [Infinite F] {E : Type*} [Field E] (ϕ : F →+* E) (α β : E)
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 86 | 96 | theorem primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (f g : F[X]) :
∃ c : F, ∀ α' ∈ (f.map ϕ).roots, ∀ β' ∈ (g.map ϕ).roots, -(α' - α) / (β' - β) ≠ ϕ c := by |
let sf := (f.map ϕ).roots
let sg := (g.map ϕ).roots
let s := (sf.bind fun α' => sg.map fun β' => -(α' - α) / (β' - β)).toFinset
let s' := s.preimage ϕ fun x _ y _ h => ϕ.injective h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset s'
simp_rw [s', s, Finset.mem_preimage, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Multiset.mem_bind, Multiset.mem_map]
at hc
push_neg at hc
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,432 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
#align_import field_theory.primitive_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
section PrimitiveElementInf
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] [Infinite F] {E : Type*} [Field E] (ϕ : F →+* E) (α β : E)
theorem primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (f g : F[X]) :
∃ c : F, ∀ α' ∈ (f.map ϕ).roots, ∀ β' ∈ (g.map ϕ).roots, -(α' - α) / (β' - β) ≠ ϕ c := by
let sf := (f.map ϕ).roots
let sg := (g.map ϕ).roots
let s := (sf.bind fun α' => sg.map fun β' => -(α' - α) / (β' - β)).toFinset
let s' := s.preimage ϕ fun x _ y _ h => ϕ.injective h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := Infinite.exists_not_mem_finset s'
simp_rw [s', s, Finset.mem_preimage, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Multiset.mem_bind, Multiset.mem_map]
at hc
push_neg at hc
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
#align field.primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c Field.primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c
variable (F)
variable [Algebra F E]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 104 | 173 | theorem primitive_element_inf_aux [IsSeparable F E] : ∃ γ : E, F⟮α, β⟯ = F⟮γ⟯ := by |
have hα := IsSeparable.isIntegral F α
have hβ := IsSeparable.isIntegral F β
let f := minpoly F α
let g := minpoly F β
let ιFE := algebraMap F E
let ιEE' := algebraMap E (SplittingField (g.map ιFE))
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := primitive_element_inf_aux_exists_c (ιEE'.comp ιFE) (ιEE' α) (ιEE' β) f g
let γ := α + c • β
suffices β_in_Fγ : β ∈ F⟮γ⟯ by
use γ
apply le_antisymm
· rw [adjoin_le_iff]
have α_in_Fγ : α ∈ F⟮γ⟯ := by
rw [← add_sub_cancel_right α (c • β)]
exact F⟮γ⟯.sub_mem (mem_adjoin_simple_self F γ) (F⟮γ⟯.toSubalgebra.smul_mem β_in_Fγ c)
rintro x (rfl | rfl) <;> assumption
· rw [adjoin_simple_le_iff]
have α_in_Fαβ : α ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert α {β})
have β_in_Fαβ : β ∈ F⟮α, β⟯ := subset_adjoin F {α, β} (Set.mem_insert_of_mem α rfl)
exact F⟮α, β⟯.add_mem α_in_Fαβ (F⟮α, β⟯.smul_mem β_in_Fαβ)
let p := EuclideanDomain.gcd ((f.map (algebraMap F F⟮γ⟯)).comp
(C (AdjoinSimple.gen F γ) - (C ↑c : F⟮γ⟯[X]) * X)) (g.map (algebraMap F F⟮γ⟯))
let h := EuclideanDomain.gcd ((f.map ιFE).comp (C γ - C (ιFE c) * X)) (g.map ιFE)
have map_g_ne_zero : g.map ιFE ≠ 0 := map_ne_zero (minpoly.ne_zero hβ)
have h_ne_zero : h ≠ 0 :=
mt EuclideanDomain.gcd_eq_zero_iff.mp (not_and.mpr fun _ => map_g_ne_zero)
suffices p_linear : p.map (algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E) = C h.leadingCoeff * (X - C β) by
have finale : β = algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E (-p.coeff 0 / p.coeff 1) := by
rw [map_div₀, RingHom.map_neg, ← coeff_map, ← coeff_map, p_linear]
-- Porting note: had to add `-map_add` to avoid going in the wrong direction.
simp [mul_sub, coeff_C, mul_div_cancel_left₀ β (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp h_ne_zero),
-map_add]
-- Porting note: an alternative solution is:
-- simp_rw [Polynomial.coeff_C_mul, Polynomial.coeff_sub, mul_sub,
-- Polynomial.coeff_X_zero, Polynomial.coeff_X_one, mul_zero, mul_one, zero_sub, neg_neg,
-- Polynomial.coeff_C, eq_self_iff_true, Nat.one_ne_zero, if_true, if_false, mul_zero,
-- sub_zero, mul_div_cancel_left β (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp h_ne_zero)]
rw [finale]
exact Subtype.mem (-p.coeff 0 / p.coeff 1)
have h_sep : h.Separable := separable_gcd_right _ (IsSeparable.separable F β).map
have h_root : h.eval β = 0 := by
apply eval_gcd_eq_zero
· rw [eval_comp, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_C, eval_X, eval_map, ← aeval_def, ←
Algebra.smul_def, add_sub_cancel_right, minpoly.aeval]
· rw [eval_map, ← aeval_def, minpoly.aeval]
have h_splits : Splits ιEE' h :=
splits_of_splits_gcd_right ιEE' map_g_ne_zero (SplittingField.splits _)
have h_roots : ∀ x ∈ (h.map ιEE').roots, x = ιEE' β := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_roots_map h_ne_zero] at hx
specialize hc (ιEE' γ - ιEE' (ιFE c) * x) (by
have f_root := root_left_of_root_gcd hx
rw [eval₂_comp, eval₂_sub, eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_C, eval₂_X, eval₂_map] at f_root
exact (mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero hα)).mpr f_root)
specialize hc x (by
rw [mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero hβ), ← eval₂_map]
exact root_right_of_root_gcd hx)
by_contra a
apply hc
apply (div_eq_iff (sub_ne_zero.mpr a)).mpr
simp only [γ, Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_mul, RingHom.comp_apply]
ring
rw [← eq_X_sub_C_of_separable_of_root_eq h_sep h_root h_splits h_roots]
trans EuclideanDomain.gcd (?_ : E[X]) (?_ : E[X])
· dsimp only [γ]
convert (gcd_map (algebraMap F⟮γ⟯ E)).symm
· simp only [map_comp, Polynomial.map_map, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, Polynomial.map_sub,
map_C, AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen, map_add, Polynomial.map_mul, map_X]
congr
| 69 | 925,378,172,558,778,900,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,432 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
#align_import field_theory.primitive_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
variable (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E]
variable [Algebra F E]
section FiniteIntermediateField
-- TODO: show a more generalized result: [F⟮α⟯ : F⟮α ^ m⟯] = m if m > 0 and α transcendental.
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 246 | 275 | theorem isAlgebraic_of_adjoin_eq_adjoin {α : E} {m n : ℕ} (hneq : m ≠ n)
(heq : F⟮α ^ m⟯ = F⟮α ^ n⟯) : IsAlgebraic F α := by |
wlog hmn : m < n
· exact this F E hneq.symm heq.symm (hneq.lt_or_lt.resolve_left hmn)
by_cases hm : m = 0
· rw [hm] at heq hmn
simp only [pow_zero, adjoin_one] at heq
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_bot.1 (heq.symm ▸ mem_adjoin_simple_self F (α ^ n))
refine ⟨X ^ n - C y, X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hmn y, ?_⟩
simp only [map_sub, map_pow, aeval_X, aeval_C, h, sub_self]
obtain ⟨r, s, h⟩ := (mem_adjoin_simple_iff F _).1 (heq ▸ mem_adjoin_simple_self F (α ^ m))
by_cases hzero : aeval (α ^ n) s = 0
· simp only [hzero, div_zero, pow_eq_zero_iff hm] at h
exact h.symm ▸ isAlgebraic_zero
replace hm : 0 < m := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hm
rw [eq_div_iff hzero, ← sub_eq_zero] at h
replace hzero : s ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp only [map_zero, not_true_eq_false] at hzero
let f : F[X] := X ^ m * expand F n s - expand F n r
refine ⟨f, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : f.coeff (n * s.natDegree + m) ≠ 0 := by
have hn : 0 < n := by linarith only [hm, hmn]
have hndvd : ¬ n ∣ n * s.natDegree + m := by
rw [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (n.dvd_mul_right s.natDegree)]
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt hm hmn
simp only [f, coeff_sub, coeff_X_pow_mul, s.coeff_expand_mul' hn, coeff_natDegree,
coeff_expand hn r, hndvd, ite_false, sub_zero]
exact leadingCoeff_ne_zero.2 hzero
intro h
simp only [h, coeff_zero, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at this
· simp only [f, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, aeval_X, expand_aeval, h]
| 28 | 1,446,257,064,291.475 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,432 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IsAlgClosed.AlgebraicClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
#align_import field_theory.primitive_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial IntermediateField
namespace Field
variable (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E]
variable [Algebra F E]
section FiniteIntermediateField
-- TODO: show a more generalized result: [F⟮α⟯ : F⟮α ^ m⟯] = m if m > 0 and α transcendental.
theorem isAlgebraic_of_adjoin_eq_adjoin {α : E} {m n : ℕ} (hneq : m ≠ n)
(heq : F⟮α ^ m⟯ = F⟮α ^ n⟯) : IsAlgebraic F α := by
wlog hmn : m < n
· exact this F E hneq.symm heq.symm (hneq.lt_or_lt.resolve_left hmn)
by_cases hm : m = 0
· rw [hm] at heq hmn
simp only [pow_zero, adjoin_one] at heq
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := mem_bot.1 (heq.symm ▸ mem_adjoin_simple_self F (α ^ n))
refine ⟨X ^ n - C y, X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hmn y, ?_⟩
simp only [map_sub, map_pow, aeval_X, aeval_C, h, sub_self]
obtain ⟨r, s, h⟩ := (mem_adjoin_simple_iff F _).1 (heq ▸ mem_adjoin_simple_self F (α ^ m))
by_cases hzero : aeval (α ^ n) s = 0
· simp only [hzero, div_zero, pow_eq_zero_iff hm] at h
exact h.symm ▸ isAlgebraic_zero
replace hm : 0 < m := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hm
rw [eq_div_iff hzero, ← sub_eq_zero] at h
replace hzero : s ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp only [map_zero, not_true_eq_false] at hzero
let f : F[X] := X ^ m * expand F n s - expand F n r
refine ⟨f, ?_, ?_⟩
· have : f.coeff (n * s.natDegree + m) ≠ 0 := by
have hn : 0 < n := by linarith only [hm, hmn]
have hndvd : ¬ n ∣ n * s.natDegree + m := by
rw [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (n.dvd_mul_right s.natDegree)]
exact Nat.not_dvd_of_pos_of_lt hm hmn
simp only [f, coeff_sub, coeff_X_pow_mul, s.coeff_expand_mul' hn, coeff_natDegree,
coeff_expand hn r, hndvd, ite_false, sub_zero]
exact leadingCoeff_ne_zero.2 hzero
intro h
simp only [h, coeff_zero, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at this
· simp only [f, map_sub, map_mul, map_pow, aeval_X, expand_aeval, h]
theorem isAlgebraic_of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E := ⟨fun α ↦
have ⟨_m, _n, hneq, heq⟩ := Finite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_infinite fun n ↦ F⟮α ^ n⟯
isAlgebraic_of_adjoin_eq_adjoin F E hneq heq⟩
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PrimitiveElement.lean | 282 | 292 | theorem FiniteDimensional.of_finite_intermediateField
[Finite (IntermediateField F E)] : FiniteDimensional F E := by |
let IF := { K : IntermediateField F E // ∃ x, K = F⟮x⟯ }
have := isAlgebraic_of_finite_intermediateField F E
haveI : ∀ K : IF, FiniteDimensional F K.1 := fun ⟨_, x, rfl⟩ ↦ adjoin.finiteDimensional
(Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral _)
have hfin := finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite (t := fun K : IF ↦ K.1)
have htop : ⨆ K : IF, K.1 = ⊤ := le_top.antisymm fun x _ ↦
le_iSup (fun K : IF ↦ K.1) ⟨F⟮x⟯, x, rfl⟩ <| mem_adjoin_simple_self F x
rw [htop] at hfin
exact topEquiv.toLinearEquiv.finiteDimensional
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2,432 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 89 | 96 | theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by |
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,433 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
#align nat.prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 99 | 109 | theorem prime_def_lt'' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.two_le, h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: needed to make ℕ explicit
have h1 := (@one_lt_two ℕ ..).trans_le h.1
refine ⟨mt Nat.isUnit_iff.mp h1.ne', fun a b hab => ?_⟩
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff]
apply Or.imp_right _ (h.2 a _)
· rintro rfl
rw [← mul_right_inj' (pos_of_gt h1).ne', ← hab, mul_one]
· rw [hab]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
| 10 | 22,026.465795 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,433 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
#align_import data.nat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
open Bool Subtype
open Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
-- Porting note (#11180): removed @[pp_nodot]
def Prime (p : ℕ) :=
Irreducible p
#align nat.prime Nat.Prime
theorem irreducible_iff_nat_prime (a : ℕ) : Irreducible a ↔ Nat.Prime a :=
Iff.rfl
#align irreducible_iff_nat_prime Nat.irreducible_iff_nat_prime
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_zero : ¬Prime 0
| h => h.ne_zero rfl
#align nat.not_prime_zero Nat.not_prime_zero
@[aesop safe destruct] theorem not_prime_one : ¬Prime 1
| h => h.ne_one rfl
#align nat.not_prime_one Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.ne_zero {n : ℕ} (h : Prime n) : n ≠ 0 :=
Irreducible.ne_zero h
#align nat.prime.ne_zero Nat.Prime.ne_zero
theorem Prime.pos {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) : 0 < p :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.pos Nat.Prime.pos
theorem Prime.two_le : ∀ {p : ℕ}, Prime p → 2 ≤ p
| 0, h => (not_prime_zero h).elim
| 1, h => (not_prime_one h).elim
| _ + 2, _ => le_add_self
#align nat.prime.two_le Nat.Prime.two_le
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p → 1 < p :=
Prime.two_le
#align nat.prime.one_lt Nat.Prime.one_lt
lemma Prime.one_le {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : 1 ≤ p := hp.one_lt.le
instance Prime.one_lt' (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (1 < p) :=
⟨hp.1.one_lt⟩
#align nat.prime.one_lt' Nat.Prime.one_lt'
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : p ≠ 1 :=
hp.one_lt.ne'
#align nat.prime.ne_one Nat.Prime.ne_one
theorem Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (m : ℕ) (hm : m ∣ p) :
m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hm
have := pp.isUnit_or_isUnit hn
rw [Nat.isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff] at this
apply Or.imp_right _ this
rintro rfl
rw [hn, mul_one]
#align nat.prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd Nat.Prime.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd
theorem prime_def_lt'' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, m ∣ p → m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.two_le, h.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
-- Porting note: needed to make ℕ explicit
have h1 := (@one_lt_two ℕ ..).trans_le h.1
refine ⟨mt Nat.isUnit_iff.mp h1.ne', fun a b hab => ?_⟩
simp only [Nat.isUnit_iff]
apply Or.imp_right _ (h.2 a _)
· rintro rfl
rw [← mul_right_inj' (pos_of_gt h1).ne', ← hab, mul_one]
· rw [hab]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align nat.prime_def_lt'' Nat.prime_def_lt''
theorem prime_def_lt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m < p, m ∣ p → m = 1 :=
prime_def_lt''.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
⟨fun h l d => (h d).resolve_right (ne_of_lt l), fun h d =>
(le_of_dvd (le_of_succ_le p2) d).lt_or_eq_dec.imp_left fun l => h l d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt Nat.prime_def_lt
theorem prime_def_lt' {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m < p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
forall_congr' fun m =>
⟨fun h m2 l d => not_lt_of_ge m2 ((h l d).symm ▸ by decide), fun h l d => by
rcases m with (_ | _ | m)
· rw [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd d] at p2
revert p2
decide
· rfl
· exact (h le_add_self l).elim d⟩
#align nat.prime_def_lt' Nat.prime_def_lt'
theorem prime_def_le_sqrt {p : ℕ} : Prime p ↔ 2 ≤ p ∧ ∀ m, 2 ≤ m → m ≤ sqrt p → ¬m ∣ p :=
prime_def_lt'.trans <|
and_congr_right fun p2 =>
⟨fun a m m2 l => a m m2 <| lt_of_le_of_lt l <| sqrt_lt_self p2, fun a =>
have : ∀ {m k : ℕ}, m ≤ k → 1 < m → p ≠ m * k := fun {m k} mk m1 e =>
a m m1 (le_sqrt.2 (e.symm ▸ Nat.mul_le_mul_left m mk)) ⟨k, e⟩
fun m m2 l ⟨k, e⟩ => by
rcases le_total m k with mk | km
· exact this mk m2 e
· rw [mul_comm] at e
refine this km (lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (zero_le m)) e
rwa [one_mul, ← e]⟩
#align nat.prime_def_le_sqrt Nat.prime_def_le_sqrt
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Prime.lean | 147 | 153 | theorem prime_of_coprime (n : ℕ) (h1 : 1 < n) (h : ∀ m < n, m ≠ 0 → n.Coprime m) : Prime n := by |
refine prime_def_lt.mpr ⟨h1, fun m mlt mdvd => ?_⟩
have hm : m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at mdvd
exact mlt.ne' mdvd
exact (h m mlt hm).symm.eq_one_of_dvd mdvd
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,433 |
import Mathlib.Init.Align
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Exact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.EpiMono
#align_import category_theory.abelian.pseudoelements from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Abelian
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory.Abelian
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
attribute [local instance] Over.coeFromHom
def app {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (a : Over P) : Over Q :=
a.hom ≫ f
#align category_theory.abelian.app CategoryTheory.Abelian.app
@[simp]
theorem app_hom {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (a : Over P) : (app f a).hom = a.hom ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.abelian.app_hom CategoryTheory.Abelian.app_hom
def PseudoEqual (P : C) (f g : Over P) : Prop :=
∃ (R : C) (p : R ⟶ f.1) (q : R ⟶ g.1) (_ : Epi p) (_ : Epi q), p ≫ f.hom = q ≫ g.hom
#align category_theory.abelian.pseudo_equal CategoryTheory.Abelian.PseudoEqual
theorem pseudoEqual_refl {P : C} : Reflexive (PseudoEqual P) :=
fun f => ⟨f.1, 𝟙 f.1, 𝟙 f.1, inferInstance, inferInstance, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.abelian.pseudo_equal_refl CategoryTheory.Abelian.pseudoEqual_refl
theorem pseudoEqual_symm {P : C} : Symmetric (PseudoEqual P) :=
fun _ _ ⟨R, p, q, ep, Eq, comm⟩ => ⟨R, q, p, Eq, ep, comm.symm⟩
#align category_theory.abelian.pseudo_equal_symm CategoryTheory.Abelian.pseudoEqual_symm
variable [Abelian.{v} C]
section
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Pseudoelements.lean | 124 | 128 | theorem pseudoEqual_trans {P : C} : Transitive (PseudoEqual P) := by |
intro f g h ⟨R, p, q, ep, Eq, comm⟩ ⟨R', p', q', ep', eq', comm'⟩
refine ⟨pullback q p', pullback.fst ≫ p, pullback.snd ≫ q', epi_comp _ _, epi_comp _ _, ?_⟩
rw [Category.assoc, comm, ← Category.assoc, pullback.condition, Category.assoc, comm',
Category.assoc]
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,434 |
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.graded_algebra.homogeneous_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4e861f25ba5ceef42ba0712d8ffeb32f38ad6441"
open SetLike DirectSum Set
open Pointwise DirectSum
variable {ι σ R A : Type*}
section HomogeneousDef
variable [Semiring A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜]
variable (I : Ideal A)
def Ideal.IsHomogeneous : Prop :=
∀ (i : ι) ⦃r : A⦄, r ∈ I → (DirectSum.decompose 𝒜 r i : A) ∈ I
#align ideal.is_homogeneous Ideal.IsHomogeneous
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousIdeal.lean | 64 | 69 | theorem Ideal.IsHomogeneous.mem_iff {I} (hI : Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 I) {x} :
x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, (decompose 𝒜 x i : A) ∈ I := by |
classical
refine ⟨fun hx i ↦ hI i hx, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← DirectSum.sum_support_decompose 𝒜 x]
exact Ideal.sum_mem _ (fun i _ ↦ hx i)
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,435 |
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.graded_algebra.homogeneous_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4e861f25ba5ceef42ba0712d8ffeb32f38ad6441"
open SetLike DirectSum Set
open Pointwise DirectSum
variable {ι σ R A : Type*}
section HomogeneousDef
variable [Semiring A]
variable [SetLike σ A] [AddSubmonoidClass σ A] (𝒜 : ι → σ)
variable [DecidableEq ι] [AddMonoid ι] [GradedRing 𝒜]
variable (I : Ideal A)
def Ideal.IsHomogeneous : Prop :=
∀ (i : ι) ⦃r : A⦄, r ∈ I → (DirectSum.decompose 𝒜 r i : A) ∈ I
#align ideal.is_homogeneous Ideal.IsHomogeneous
theorem Ideal.IsHomogeneous.mem_iff {I} (hI : Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 I) {x} :
x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, (decompose 𝒜 x i : A) ∈ I := by
classical
refine ⟨fun hx i ↦ hI i hx, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← DirectSum.sum_support_decompose 𝒜 x]
exact Ideal.sum_mem _ (fun i _ ↦ hx i)
structure HomogeneousIdeal extends Submodule A A where
is_homogeneous' : Ideal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 toSubmodule
#align homogeneous_ideal HomogeneousIdeal
variable {𝒜}
def HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal (I : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : Ideal A :=
I.toSubmodule
#align homogeneous_ideal.to_ideal HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.isHomogeneous (I : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) : I.toIdeal.IsHomogeneous 𝒜 :=
I.is_homogeneous'
#align homogeneous_ideal.is_homogeneous HomogeneousIdeal.isHomogeneous
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective :
Function.Injective (HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜 → Ideal A) :=
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ => fun (h : x = y) => by simp [h]
#align homogeneous_ideal.to_ideal_injective HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective
instance HomogeneousIdeal.setLike : SetLike (HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜) A where
coe I := I.toIdeal
coe_injective' _ _ h := HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective <| SetLike.coe_injective h
#align homogeneous_ideal.set_like HomogeneousIdeal.setLike
@[ext]
theorem HomogeneousIdeal.ext {I J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜} (h : I.toIdeal = J.toIdeal) : I = J :=
HomogeneousIdeal.toIdeal_injective h
#align homogeneous_ideal.ext HomogeneousIdeal.ext
| Mathlib/RingTheory/GradedAlgebra/HomogeneousIdeal.lean | 102 | 107 | theorem HomogeneousIdeal.ext' {I J : HomogeneousIdeal 𝒜} (h : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ 𝒜 i, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) :
I = J := by |
ext
rw [I.isHomogeneous.mem_iff, J.isHomogeneous.mem_iff]
apply forall_congr'
exact fun i ↦ h i _ (decompose 𝒜 _ i).2
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,435 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal
#align_import measure_theory.integral.vitali_caratheodory from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
[WeaklyRegular μ]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/VitaliCaratheodory.lean | 93 | 152 | theorem SimpleFunc.exists_le_lowerSemicontinuous_lintegral_ge (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ LowerSemicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) + ε := by |
induction' f using MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.induction with c s hs f₁ f₂ _ h₁ h₂ generalizing ε
· let f := SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const α c) (SimpleFunc.const α 0)
by_cases h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⊤
· refine
⟨fun _ => c, fun x => ?_, lowerSemicontinuous_const, by
simp only [_root_.top_add, le_top, h]⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.coe_const, SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_zero,
Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact Set.indicator_le_self _ _ _
by_cases hc : c = 0
· refine ⟨fun _ => 0, ?_, lowerSemicontinuous_const, ?_⟩
· classical
simp only [hc, Set.indicator_zero', Pi.zero_apply, SimpleFunc.const_zero, imp_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, SimpleFunc.coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator,
SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, le_zero_iff]
· simp only [lintegral_const, zero_mul, zero_le, ENNReal.coe_zero]
have ne_top : μ s ≠ ⊤ := by
classical
simpa [f, hs, hc, lt_top_iff_ne_top, true_and_iff, SimpleFunc.coe_const,
Function.const_apply, lintegral_const, ENNReal.coe_indicator, Set.univ_inter,
ENNReal.coe_ne_top, MeasurableSet.univ, ENNReal.mul_eq_top, SimpleFunc.const_zero,
or_false_iff, lintegral_indicator, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne, not_false_iff,
SimpleFunc.coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, false_and_iff,
restrict_apply] using h
have : μ s < μ s + ε / c := by
have : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < ε / c := ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0, ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
simpa using ENNReal.add_lt_add_left ne_top this
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ (u : _), u ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen u ∧ μ u < μ s + ε / c :=
s.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ this
refine ⟨Set.indicator u fun _ => c,
fun x => ?_, u_open.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (zero_le _), ?_⟩
· simp only [SimpleFunc.coe_const, SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_zero,
Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset su (fun x => zero_le _) _
· suffices (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * μ s + ε by
classical
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_indicator, u_open.measurableSet, lintegral_indicator,
lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, Set.univ_inter, const_zero,
coe_piecewise, coe_const, coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, Function.const_apply, hs]
calc
(c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * (μ s + ε / c) := mul_le_mul_left' μu.le _
_ = c * μ s + ε := by
simp_rw [mul_add]
rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' _ ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
simpa using hc
· rcases h₁ (ENNReal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₁, f₁_le_g₁, g₁cont, g₁int⟩
rcases h₂ (ENNReal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₂, f₂_le_g₂, g₂cont, g₂int⟩
refine
⟨fun x => g₁ x + g₂ x, fun x => add_le_add (f₁_le_g₁ x) (f₂_le_g₂ x), g₁cont.add g₂cont, ?_⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
rw [lintegral_add_left f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
lintegral_add_left g₁cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal]
convert add_le_add g₁int g₂int using 1
conv_lhs => rw [← ENNReal.add_halves ε]
abel
| 55 | 769,478,526,514,201,800,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,436 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.Semicontinuous
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal
#align_import measure_theory.integral.vitali_caratheodory from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"57ac39bd365c2f80589a700f9fbb664d3a1a30c2"
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
[WeaklyRegular μ]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
theorem SimpleFunc.exists_le_lowerSemicontinuous_lintegral_ge (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(ε0 : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0, (∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ LowerSemicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) + ε := by
induction' f using MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.induction with c s hs f₁ f₂ _ h₁ h₂ generalizing ε
· let f := SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (SimpleFunc.const α c) (SimpleFunc.const α 0)
by_cases h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⊤
· refine
⟨fun _ => c, fun x => ?_, lowerSemicontinuous_const, by
simp only [_root_.top_add, le_top, h]⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.coe_const, SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_zero,
Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact Set.indicator_le_self _ _ _
by_cases hc : c = 0
· refine ⟨fun _ => 0, ?_, lowerSemicontinuous_const, ?_⟩
· classical
simp only [hc, Set.indicator_zero', Pi.zero_apply, SimpleFunc.const_zero, imp_true_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, SimpleFunc.coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator,
SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, le_zero_iff]
· simp only [lintegral_const, zero_mul, zero_le, ENNReal.coe_zero]
have ne_top : μ s ≠ ⊤ := by
classical
simpa [f, hs, hc, lt_top_iff_ne_top, true_and_iff, SimpleFunc.coe_const,
Function.const_apply, lintegral_const, ENNReal.coe_indicator, Set.univ_inter,
ENNReal.coe_ne_top, MeasurableSet.univ, ENNReal.mul_eq_top, SimpleFunc.const_zero,
or_false_iff, lintegral_indicator, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne, not_false_iff,
SimpleFunc.coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise, false_and_iff,
restrict_apply] using h
have : μ s < μ s + ε / c := by
have : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < ε / c := ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ε0, ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
simpa using ENNReal.add_lt_add_left ne_top this
obtain ⟨u, su, u_open, μu⟩ : ∃ (u : _), u ⊇ s ∧ IsOpen u ∧ μ u < μ s + ε / c :=
s.exists_isOpen_lt_of_lt _ this
refine ⟨Set.indicator u fun _ => c,
fun x => ?_, u_open.lowerSemicontinuous_indicator (zero_le _), ?_⟩
· simp only [SimpleFunc.coe_const, SimpleFunc.const_zero, SimpleFunc.coe_zero,
Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, SimpleFunc.coe_piecewise]
exact Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset su (fun x => zero_le _) _
· suffices (c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * μ s + ε by
classical
simpa only [ENNReal.coe_indicator, u_open.measurableSet, lintegral_indicator,
lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, Set.univ_inter, const_zero,
coe_piecewise, coe_const, coe_zero, Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, Function.const_apply, hs]
calc
(c : ℝ≥0∞) * μ u ≤ c * (μ s + ε / c) := mul_le_mul_left' μu.le _
_ = c * μ s + ε := by
simp_rw [mul_add]
rw [ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' _ ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
simpa using hc
· rcases h₁ (ENNReal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₁, f₁_le_g₁, g₁cont, g₁int⟩
rcases h₂ (ENNReal.half_pos ε0).ne' with ⟨g₂, f₂_le_g₂, g₂cont, g₂int⟩
refine
⟨fun x => g₁ x + g₂ x, fun x => add_le_add (f₁_le_g₁ x) (f₂_le_g₂ x), g₁cont.add g₂cont, ?_⟩
simp only [SimpleFunc.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_add, Pi.add_apply]
rw [lintegral_add_left f₁.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal,
lintegral_add_left g₁cont.measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal]
convert add_le_add g₁int g₂int using 1
conv_lhs => rw [← ENNReal.add_halves ε]
abel
#align measure_theory.simple_func.exists_le_lower_semicontinuous_lintegral_ge MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.exists_le_lowerSemicontinuous_lintegral_ge
-- Porting note: errors with
-- `ambiguous identifier 'eapproxDiff', possible interpretations:`
-- `[SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff, SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff]`
-- open SimpleFunc (eapproxDiff tsum_eapproxDiff)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/VitaliCaratheodory.lean | 164 | 195 | theorem exists_le_lowerSemicontinuous_lintegral_ge (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(εpos : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞,
(∀ x, f x ≤ g x) ∧ LowerSemicontinuous g ∧ (∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) + ε := by |
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable' εpos ℕ with ⟨δ, δpos, hδ⟩
have :
∀ n,
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff f n x ≤ g x) ∧
LowerSemicontinuous g ∧
(∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ x, SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff f n x ∂μ) + δ n :=
fun n =>
SimpleFunc.exists_le_lowerSemicontinuous_lintegral_ge μ (SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff f n)
(δpos n).ne'
choose g f_le_g gcont hg using this
refine ⟨fun x => ∑' n, g n x, fun x => ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← SimpleFunc.tsum_eapproxDiff f hf]
exact ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (f_le_g n x)
· refine lowerSemicontinuous_tsum fun n => ?_
exact
ENNReal.continuous_coe.comp_lowerSemicontinuous (gcont n) fun x y hxy =>
ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 hxy
· calc
∫⁻ x, ∑' n : ℕ, g n x ∂μ = ∑' n, ∫⁻ x, g n x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_tsum fun n => (gcont n).measurable.coe_nnreal_ennreal.aemeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, ((∫⁻ x, SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff f n x ∂μ) + δ n) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hg
_ = ∑' n, ∫⁻ x, SimpleFunc.eapproxDiff f n x ∂μ + ∑' n, δ n := ENNReal.tsum_add
_ ≤ (∫⁻ x : α, f x ∂μ) + ε := by
refine add_le_add ?_ hδ.le
rw [← lintegral_tsum]
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.tsum_eapproxDiff f hf, le_refl]
· intro n; exact (SimpleFunc.measurable _).coe_nnreal_ennreal.aemeasurable
| 28 | 1,446,257,064,291.475 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,436 |
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.dfinsupp.well_founded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e9b8651eb1ad354f4de6be35a38ef31efcd2cfaa"
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
open Relation Prod
section Zero
variable [∀ i, Zero (α i)] (r : ι → ι → Prop) (s : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop)
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/WellFounded.lean | 69 | 98 | theorem lex_fibration [∀ (i) (s : Set ι), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
Fibration (InvImage (GameAdd (DFinsupp.Lex r s) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)) snd) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)
fun x => piecewise x.2.1 x.2.2 x.1 := by |
rintro ⟨p, x₁, x₂⟩ x ⟨i, hr, hs⟩
simp_rw [piecewise_apply] at hs hr
split_ifs at hs with hp
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i → j ∈ p }, piecewise x₁ x { j | r j i }, x₂⟩,
.fst ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· simp only [if_pos hj]
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_pos hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₂, if_pos (h₁ h₂)]
· rw [Classical.not_imp] at h₁
rw [hr j h₁.1, if_neg h₁.2]
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i ∧ j ∈ p }, x₁, piecewise x₂ x { j | r j i }⟩,
.snd ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· exact if_pos hj
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_neg hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₁.1, if_pos h₁.2]
· rw [hr j h₂, if_neg]
simpa [h₂] using h₁
| 27 | 532,048,240,601.79865 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,437 |
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.dfinsupp.well_founded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e9b8651eb1ad354f4de6be35a38ef31efcd2cfaa"
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
open Relation Prod
section Zero
variable [∀ i, Zero (α i)] (r : ι → ι → Prop) (s : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop)
theorem lex_fibration [∀ (i) (s : Set ι), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
Fibration (InvImage (GameAdd (DFinsupp.Lex r s) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)) snd) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)
fun x => piecewise x.2.1 x.2.2 x.1 := by
rintro ⟨p, x₁, x₂⟩ x ⟨i, hr, hs⟩
simp_rw [piecewise_apply] at hs hr
split_ifs at hs with hp
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i → j ∈ p }, piecewise x₁ x { j | r j i }, x₂⟩,
.fst ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· simp only [if_pos hj]
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_pos hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₂, if_pos (h₁ h₂)]
· rw [Classical.not_imp] at h₁
rw [hr j h₁.1, if_neg h₁.2]
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i ∧ j ∈ p }, x₁, piecewise x₂ x { j | r j i }⟩,
.snd ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· exact if_pos hj
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_neg hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₁.1, if_pos h₁.2]
· rw [hr j h₂, if_neg]
simpa [h₂] using h₁
#align dfinsupp.lex_fibration DFinsupp.lex_fibration
variable {r s}
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/WellFounded.lean | 103 | 109 | theorem Lex.acc_of_single_erase [DecidableEq ι] {x : Π₀ i, α i} (i : ι)
(hs : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| single i (x i)) (hu : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| x.erase i) :
Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) x := by |
classical
convert ← @Acc.of_fibration _ _ _ _ _ (lex_fibration r s) ⟨{i}, _⟩
(InvImage.accessible snd <| hs.prod_gameAdd hu)
convert piecewise_single_erase x i
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,437 |
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.dfinsupp.well_founded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e9b8651eb1ad354f4de6be35a38ef31efcd2cfaa"
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
open Relation Prod
section Zero
variable [∀ i, Zero (α i)] (r : ι → ι → Prop) (s : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop)
theorem lex_fibration [∀ (i) (s : Set ι), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
Fibration (InvImage (GameAdd (DFinsupp.Lex r s) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)) snd) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)
fun x => piecewise x.2.1 x.2.2 x.1 := by
rintro ⟨p, x₁, x₂⟩ x ⟨i, hr, hs⟩
simp_rw [piecewise_apply] at hs hr
split_ifs at hs with hp
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i → j ∈ p }, piecewise x₁ x { j | r j i }, x₂⟩,
.fst ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· simp only [if_pos hj]
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_pos hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₂, if_pos (h₁ h₂)]
· rw [Classical.not_imp] at h₁
rw [hr j h₁.1, if_neg h₁.2]
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i ∧ j ∈ p }, x₁, piecewise x₂ x { j | r j i }⟩,
.snd ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· exact if_pos hj
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_neg hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₁.1, if_pos h₁.2]
· rw [hr j h₂, if_neg]
simpa [h₂] using h₁
#align dfinsupp.lex_fibration DFinsupp.lex_fibration
variable {r s}
theorem Lex.acc_of_single_erase [DecidableEq ι] {x : Π₀ i, α i} (i : ι)
(hs : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| single i (x i)) (hu : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| x.erase i) :
Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) x := by
classical
convert ← @Acc.of_fibration _ _ _ _ _ (lex_fibration r s) ⟨{i}, _⟩
(InvImage.accessible snd <| hs.prod_gameAdd hu)
convert piecewise_single_erase x i
#align dfinsupp.lex.acc_of_single_erase DFinsupp.Lex.acc_of_single_erase
variable (hbot : ∀ ⦃i a⦄, ¬s i a 0)
theorem Lex.acc_zero : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) 0 :=
Acc.intro 0 fun _ ⟨_, _, h⟩ => (hbot h).elim
#align dfinsupp.lex.acc_zero DFinsupp.Lex.acc_zero
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/WellFounded.lean | 118 | 129 | theorem Lex.acc_of_single [DecidableEq ι] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (x : Π₀ i, α i) :
(∀ i ∈ x.support, Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| single i (x i)) → Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) x := by |
generalize ht : x.support = t; revert x
classical
induction' t using Finset.induction with b t hb ih
· intro x ht
rw [support_eq_empty.1 ht]
exact fun _ => Lex.acc_zero hbot
refine fun x ht h => Lex.acc_of_single_erase b (h b <| t.mem_insert_self b) ?_
refine ih _ (by rw [support_erase, ht, Finset.erase_insert hb]) fun a ha => ?_
rw [erase_ne (ha.ne_of_not_mem hb)]
exact h a (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha)
| 10 | 22,026.465795 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,437 |
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.GameAdd
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.dfinsupp.well_founded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e9b8651eb1ad354f4de6be35a38ef31efcd2cfaa"
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
open Relation Prod
section Zero
variable [∀ i, Zero (α i)] (r : ι → ι → Prop) (s : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop)
theorem lex_fibration [∀ (i) (s : Set ι), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
Fibration (InvImage (GameAdd (DFinsupp.Lex r s) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)) snd) (DFinsupp.Lex r s)
fun x => piecewise x.2.1 x.2.2 x.1 := by
rintro ⟨p, x₁, x₂⟩ x ⟨i, hr, hs⟩
simp_rw [piecewise_apply] at hs hr
split_ifs at hs with hp
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i → j ∈ p }, piecewise x₁ x { j | r j i }, x₂⟩,
.fst ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· simp only [if_pos hj]
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_pos hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₂, if_pos (h₁ h₂)]
· rw [Classical.not_imp] at h₁
rw [hr j h₁.1, if_neg h₁.2]
· refine ⟨⟨{ j | r j i ∧ j ∈ p }, x₁, piecewise x₂ x { j | r j i }⟩,
.snd ⟨i, fun j hj ↦ ?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩ <;> simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
· exact if_pos hj
· split_ifs with hi
· rwa [hr i hi, if_neg hp] at hs
· assumption
· ext1 j
simp only [piecewise_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [hr j h₁.1, if_pos h₁.2]
· rw [hr j h₂, if_neg]
simpa [h₂] using h₁
#align dfinsupp.lex_fibration DFinsupp.lex_fibration
variable {r s}
theorem Lex.acc_of_single_erase [DecidableEq ι] {x : Π₀ i, α i} (i : ι)
(hs : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| single i (x i)) (hu : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| x.erase i) :
Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) x := by
classical
convert ← @Acc.of_fibration _ _ _ _ _ (lex_fibration r s) ⟨{i}, _⟩
(InvImage.accessible snd <| hs.prod_gameAdd hu)
convert piecewise_single_erase x i
#align dfinsupp.lex.acc_of_single_erase DFinsupp.Lex.acc_of_single_erase
variable (hbot : ∀ ⦃i a⦄, ¬s i a 0)
theorem Lex.acc_zero : Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) 0 :=
Acc.intro 0 fun _ ⟨_, _, h⟩ => (hbot h).elim
#align dfinsupp.lex.acc_zero DFinsupp.Lex.acc_zero
theorem Lex.acc_of_single [DecidableEq ι] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (x : Π₀ i, α i) :
(∀ i ∈ x.support, Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) <| single i (x i)) → Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) x := by
generalize ht : x.support = t; revert x
classical
induction' t using Finset.induction with b t hb ih
· intro x ht
rw [support_eq_empty.1 ht]
exact fun _ => Lex.acc_zero hbot
refine fun x ht h => Lex.acc_of_single_erase b (h b <| t.mem_insert_self b) ?_
refine ih _ (by rw [support_erase, ht, Finset.erase_insert hb]) fun a ha => ?_
rw [erase_ne (ha.ne_of_not_mem hb)]
exact h a (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem ha)
#align dfinsupp.lex.acc_of_single DFinsupp.Lex.acc_of_single
variable (hs : ∀ i, WellFounded (s i))
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/WellFounded.lean | 134 | 153 | theorem Lex.acc_single [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (hi : Acc (rᶜ ⊓ (· ≠ ·)) i) :
∀ a, Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) (single i a) := by |
induction' hi with i _ ih
refine fun a => WellFounded.induction (hs i)
(C := fun x ↦ Acc (DFinsupp.Lex r s) (single i x)) a fun a ha ↦ ?_
refine Acc.intro _ fun x ↦ ?_
rintro ⟨k, hr, hs⟩
rw [single_apply] at hs
split_ifs at hs with hik
swap
· exact (hbot hs).elim
subst hik
classical
refine Lex.acc_of_single hbot x fun j hj ↦ ?_
obtain rfl | hij := eq_or_ne i j
· exact ha _ hs
by_cases h : r j i
· rw [hr j h, single_eq_of_ne hij, single_zero]
exact Lex.acc_zero hbot
· exact ih _ ⟨h, hij.symm⟩ _
| 18 | 65,659,969.137331 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,437 |
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.gauss_eisenstein_lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8818fdefc78642a7e6afcd20be5c184f3c7d9699"
open Finset Nat
open scoped Nat
section GaussEisenstein
namespace ZMod
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/GaussEisensteinLemmas.lean | 30 | 60 | theorem Ico_map_valMinAbs_natAbs_eq_Ico_map_id (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ZMod p)
(hap : a ≠ 0) : ((Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).1.map fun (x : ℕ) => (a * x).valMinAbs.natAbs) =
(Ico 1 (p / 2).succ).1.map fun a => a := by |
have he : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ → x ≠ 0 ∧ x ≤ p / 2 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
have hep : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ → x < p := fun hx =>
lt_of_le_of_lt (he hx).2 (Nat.div_lt_self hp.1.pos (by decide))
have hpe : ∀ {x}, x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ → ¬p ∣ x := fun hx hpx =>
not_lt_of_ge (le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (he hx).1) hpx) (hep hx)
have hmem : ∀ (x : ℕ) (hx : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ),
(a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ := by
intro x hx
simp [hap, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod p) p, hpe hx, Nat.lt_succ_iff, succ_le_iff,
pos_iff_ne_zero, natAbs_valMinAbs_le _]
have hsurj : ∀ (b : ℕ) (hb : b ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ),
∃ x, ∃ _ : x ∈ Ico 1 (p / 2).succ, (a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs = b := by
intro b hb
refine ⟨(b / a : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs, mem_Ico.mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, hap, CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod p) p, hpe hb, not_false_iff,
valMinAbs_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero, Int.natAbs_eq_zero, Ne, _root_.mul_eq_zero, or_self_iff]
· apply lt_succ_of_le; apply natAbs_valMinAbs_le
· rw [natCast_natAbs_valMinAbs]
split_ifs
· erw [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hap, valMinAbs_def_pos, val_cast_of_lt (hep hb),
if_pos (le_of_lt_succ (mem_Ico.1 hb).2), Int.natAbs_ofNat]
· erw [mul_neg, mul_div_cancel₀ _ hap, natAbs_valMinAbs_neg, valMinAbs_def_pos,
val_cast_of_lt (hep hb), if_pos (le_of_lt_succ (mem_Ico.1 hb).2), Int.natAbs_ofNat]
exact Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup _ _ (Finset.nodup _) (Finset.nodup _)
(fun x _ => (a * x : ZMod p).valMinAbs.natAbs) hmem
(inj_on_of_surj_on_of_card_le _ hmem hsurj le_rfl) hsurj (fun _ _ => rfl)
| 28 | 1,446,257,064,291.475 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,438 |
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Nonarchimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Pointwise
#align_import topology.algebra.nonarchimedean.bases from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Filter Function Lattice
open Topology Filter Pointwise
structure RingSubgroupsBasis {A ι : Type*} [Ring A] (B : ι → AddSubgroup A) : Prop where
inter : ∀ i j, ∃ k, B k ≤ B i ⊓ B j
mul : ∀ i, ∃ j, (B j : Set A) * B j ⊆ B i
leftMul : ∀ x : A, ∀ i, ∃ j, (B j : Set A) ⊆ (x * ·) ⁻¹' B i
rightMul : ∀ x : A, ∀ i, ∃ j, (B j : Set A) ⊆ (· * x) ⁻¹' B i
#align ring_subgroups_basis RingSubgroupsBasis
variable {ι R A : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Algebra R A]
structure SubmodulesRingBasis (B : ι → Submodule R A) : Prop where
inter : ∀ i j, ∃ k, B k ≤ B i ⊓ B j
leftMul : ∀ (a : A) (i), ∃ j, a • B j ≤ B i
mul : ∀ i, ∃ j, (B j : Set A) * B j ⊆ B i
#align submodules_ring_basis SubmodulesRingBasis
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
structure SubmodulesBasis [TopologicalSpace R] (B : ι → Submodule R M) : Prop where
inter : ∀ i j, ∃ k, B k ≤ B i ⊓ B j
smul : ∀ (m : M) (i : ι), ∀ᶠ a in 𝓝 (0 : R), a • m ∈ B i
#align submodules_basis SubmodulesBasis
namespace SubmodulesBasis
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [Nonempty ι] {B : ι → Submodule R M} (hB : SubmodulesBasis B)
def toModuleFilterBasis : ModuleFilterBasis R M where
sets := { U | ∃ i, U = B i }
nonempty := by
inhabit ι
exact ⟨B default, default, rfl⟩
inter_sets := by
rintro _ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩ ⟨j, rfl⟩
cases' hB.inter i j with k hk
use B k
constructor
· use k
· exact hk
zero' := by
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact (B i).zero_mem
add' := by
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
use B i
constructor
· use i
· rintro x ⟨y, y_in, z, z_in, rfl⟩
exact (B i).add_mem y_in z_in
neg' := by
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
use B i
constructor
· use i
· intro x x_in
exact (B i).neg_mem x_in
conj' := by
rintro x₀ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
use B i
constructor
· use i
· simp
smul' := by
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
use univ
constructor
· exact univ_mem
· use B i
constructor
· use i
· rintro _ ⟨a, -, m, hm, rfl⟩
exact (B i).smul_mem _ hm
smul_left' := by
rintro x₀ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
use B i
constructor
· use i
· intro m
exact (B i).smul_mem _
smul_right' := by
rintro m₀ _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact hB.smul m₀ i
#align submodules_basis.to_module_filter_basis SubmodulesBasis.toModuleFilterBasis
def topology : TopologicalSpace M :=
hB.toModuleFilterBasis.toAddGroupFilterBasis.topology
#align submodules_basis.topology SubmodulesBasis.topology
def openAddSubgroup (i : ι) : @OpenAddSubgroup M _ hB.topology :=
let _ := hB.topology -- Porting note: failed to synthesize instance `TopologicalSpace A`
{ (B i).toAddSubgroup with
isOpen' := by
letI := hB.topology
rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
intro a a_in
rw [(hB.toModuleFilterBasis.toAddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_hasBasis a).mem_iff]
use B i
constructor
· use i
· rintro - ⟨b, b_in, rfl⟩
exact (B i).add_mem a_in b_in }
#align submodules_basis.open_add_subgroup SubmodulesBasis.openAddSubgroup
-- see Note [nonarchimedean non instances]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Nonarchimedean/Bases.lean | 339 | 345 | theorem nonarchimedean (hB : SubmodulesBasis B) : @NonarchimedeanAddGroup M _ hB.topology := by |
letI := hB.topology
constructor
intro U hU
obtain ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi : (B i : Set M) ⊆ U⟩ :=
hB.toModuleFilterBasis.toAddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis.mem_iff.mp hU
exact ⟨hB.openAddSubgroup i, hi⟩
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,439 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.order.rearrangement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3f25363ae62cb169e72cd6b8b1ac97bacf21ca7"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section SMul
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Rearrangement.lean | 62 | 108 | theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by |
classical
revert hσ σ hfg
-- Porting note: Specify `p` to get around `∀ {σ}` in the current goal.
apply Finset.induction_on_max_value (fun i ↦ toLex (g i, f i))
(p := fun t ↦ ∀ {σ : Perm ι}, MonovaryOn f g t → { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ t →
(∑ i ∈ t, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i • g i) s
· simp only [le_rfl, Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
intro a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ
set τ : Perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
intro x hx
simp only [τ, Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.swap_comp_apply] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h₁ h₂
· obtain rfl | hax := eq_or_ne x a
· contradiction
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hax <| h.symm.trans h₁) hax
· exact (hx <| σ.injective h₂.symm).elim
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ hx) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h₂)
specialize hind (hfg.subset <| subset_insert _ _) hτs
simp_rw [sum_insert has]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left hind _)
obtain hσa | hσa := eq_or_ne a (σ a)
· rw [hτ, ← hσa, swap_self, trans_refl]
have h1s : σ⁻¹ a ∈ s := by
rw [Ne, ← inv_eq_iff_eq] at hσa
refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hσa ?_) hσa
rwa [apply_inv_self, eq_comm] at h
simp only [← s.sum_erase_add _ h1s, add_comm]
rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
simp only [hτ, swap_apply_left, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, apply_inv_self]
refine add_le_add (smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' ?_ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_).le
· specialize hamax (σ⁻¹ a) h1s
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hfg (mem_insert_of_mem h1s) (mem_insert_self _ _) hamax
· exact hamax.2
· specialize hamax (σ a) (mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ <| σ.injective.ne hσa.symm) hσa.symm)
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hamax.le
· exact hamax.1.le
· rw [mem_erase, Ne, eq_inv_iff_eq] at hx
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx.1 (σ.injective.ne _)]
rintro rfl
exact has hx.2
| 45 | 34,934,271,057,485,095,000 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,440 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.order.rearrangement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3f25363ae62cb169e72cd6b8b1ac97bacf21ca7"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section SMul
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
classical
revert hσ σ hfg
-- Porting note: Specify `p` to get around `∀ {σ}` in the current goal.
apply Finset.induction_on_max_value (fun i ↦ toLex (g i, f i))
(p := fun t ↦ ∀ {σ : Perm ι}, MonovaryOn f g t → { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ t →
(∑ i ∈ t, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i • g i) s
· simp only [le_rfl, Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
intro a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ
set τ : Perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
intro x hx
simp only [τ, Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.swap_comp_apply] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h₁ h₂
· obtain rfl | hax := eq_or_ne x a
· contradiction
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hax <| h.symm.trans h₁) hax
· exact (hx <| σ.injective h₂.symm).elim
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ hx) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h₂)
specialize hind (hfg.subset <| subset_insert _ _) hτs
simp_rw [sum_insert has]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left hind _)
obtain hσa | hσa := eq_or_ne a (σ a)
· rw [hτ, ← hσa, swap_self, trans_refl]
have h1s : σ⁻¹ a ∈ s := by
rw [Ne, ← inv_eq_iff_eq] at hσa
refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hσa ?_) hσa
rwa [apply_inv_self, eq_comm] at h
simp only [← s.sum_erase_add _ h1s, add_comm]
rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
simp only [hτ, swap_apply_left, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, apply_inv_self]
refine add_le_add (smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' ?_ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_).le
· specialize hamax (σ⁻¹ a) h1s
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hfg (mem_insert_of_mem h1s) (mem_insert_self _ _) hamax
· exact hamax.2
· specialize hamax (σ a) (mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ <| σ.injective.ne hσa.symm) hσa.symm)
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hamax.le
· exact hamax.1.le
· rw [mem_erase, Ne, eq_inv_iff_eq] at hx
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx.1 (σ.injective.ne _)]
rintro rfl
exact has hx.2
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Rearrangement.lean | 114 | 137 | theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by |
classical
refine ⟨not_imp_not.1 fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ (hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ).antisymm ?_⟩
· rw [MonovaryOn] at h
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hgxy, hfxy⟩ := h
set τ : Perm ι := (Equiv.swap x y).trans σ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
refine (set_support_mul_subset σ <| swap x y).trans (Set.union_subset hσ fun z hz ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ := swap_apply_ne_self_iff.1 hz <;> assumption
refine ((hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hτs).trans_lt' ?_).ne
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· cases lt_irrefl _ hfxy
simp only [τ, ← s.sum_erase_add _ hx,
← (s.erase x).sum_erase_add _ (mem_erase.2 ⟨hxy.symm, hy⟩),
add_assoc, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, swap_apply_right, swap_apply_left]
refine add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun z hz ↦ ?_).le
(smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul hfxy hgxy)
simp_rw [mem_erase] at hz
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hz.2.1 hz.1]
· convert h.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul ((set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ) using 1
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, apply_inv_self]
| 21 | 1,318,815,734.483215 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,440 |
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
variable {ι : Sort _} {π : ι → Sort _} {x : ∀ i, π i} [DecidableEq ι]
namespace Function
def updateFinset (x : ∀ i, π i) (s : Finset ι) (y : ∀ i : ↥s, π i) (i : ι) : π i :=
if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i
open Finset Equiv
theorem updateFinset_def {s : Finset ι} {y} :
updateFinset x s y = fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem updateFinset_empty {y} : updateFinset x ∅ y = x :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Update.lean | 35 | 41 | theorem updateFinset_singleton {i y} :
updateFinset x {i} y = Function.update x i (y ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩) := by |
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_same, updateFinset]
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
| 5 | 148.413159 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,441 |
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
variable {ι : Sort _} {π : ι → Sort _} {x : ∀ i, π i} [DecidableEq ι]
namespace Function
def updateFinset (x : ∀ i, π i) (s : Finset ι) (y : ∀ i : ↥s, π i) (i : ι) : π i :=
if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i
open Finset Equiv
theorem updateFinset_def {s : Finset ι} {y} :
updateFinset x s y = fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem updateFinset_empty {y} : updateFinset x ∅ y = x :=
rfl
theorem updateFinset_singleton {i y} :
updateFinset x {i} y = Function.update x i (y ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩) := by
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_same, updateFinset]
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Update.lean | 43 | 50 | theorem update_eq_updateFinset {i y} :
Function.update x i y = updateFinset x {i} (uniqueElim y) := by |
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_same, updateFinset]
exact uniqueElim_default (α := fun j : ({i} : Finset ι) => π j) y
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,441 |
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
variable {ι : Sort _} {π : ι → Sort _} {x : ∀ i, π i} [DecidableEq ι]
namespace Function
def updateFinset (x : ∀ i, π i) (s : Finset ι) (y : ∀ i : ↥s, π i) (i : ι) : π i :=
if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i
open Finset Equiv
theorem updateFinset_def {s : Finset ι} {y} :
updateFinset x s y = fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ s then y ⟨i, hi⟩ else x i :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem updateFinset_empty {y} : updateFinset x ∅ y = x :=
rfl
theorem updateFinset_singleton {i y} :
updateFinset x {i} y = Function.update x i (y ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩) := by
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_same, updateFinset]
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
theorem update_eq_updateFinset {i y} :
Function.update x i y = updateFinset x {i} (uniqueElim y) := by
congr with j
by_cases hj : j = i
· cases hj
simp only [dif_pos, Finset.mem_singleton, update_same, updateFinset]
exact uniqueElim_default (α := fun j : ({i} : Finset ι) => π j) y
· simp [hj, updateFinset]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Update.lean | 52 | 63 | theorem updateFinset_updateFinset {s t : Finset ι} (hst : Disjoint s t)
{y : ∀ i : ↥s, π i} {z : ∀ i : ↥t, π i} :
updateFinset (updateFinset x s y) t z =
updateFinset x (s ∪ t) (Equiv.piFinsetUnion π hst ⟨y, z⟩) := by |
set e := Equiv.Finset.union s t hst
congr with i
by_cases his : i ∈ s <;> by_cases hit : i ∈ t <;>
simp only [updateFinset, his, hit, dif_pos, dif_neg, Finset.mem_union, true_or_iff,
false_or_iff, not_false_iff]
· exfalso; exact Finset.disjoint_left.mp hst his hit
· exact piCongrLeft_sum_inl (fun b : ↥(s ∪ t) => π b) e y z ⟨i, his⟩ |>.symm
· exact piCongrLeft_sum_inr (fun b : ↥(s ∪ t) => π b) e y z ⟨i, hit⟩ |>.symm
| 8 | 2,980.957987 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,441 |
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.OpenImmersion
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
class IsClosedImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
base_closed : ClosedEmbedding f.1.base
surj_on_stalks : ∀ x, Function.Surjective (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x)
namespace IsClosedImmersion
lemma closedEmbedding {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsClosedImmersion f] : ClosedEmbedding f.1.base :=
IsClosedImmersion.base_closed
lemma surjective_stalkMap {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsClosedImmersion f] (x : X) : Function.Surjective (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x) :=
IsClosedImmersion.surj_on_stalks x
instance {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsClosedImmersion f where
base_closed := Homeomorph.closedEmbedding <| TopCat.homeoOfIso (asIso f.1.base)
surj_on_stalks := fun _ ↦ (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso _).2
instance : MorphismProperty.IsMultiplicative @IsClosedImmersion where
id_mem _ := inferInstance
comp_mem {X Y Z} f g hf hg := by
refine ⟨hg.base_closed.comp hf.base_closed, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
erw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
exact (hf.surj_on_stalks x).comp (hg.surj_on_stalks (f.1.1 x))
instance comp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsClosedImmersion f]
[IsClosedImmersion g] : IsClosedImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition.comp_mem f g inferInstance inferInstance
lemma respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @IsClosedImmersion := by
constructor <;> intro X Y Z e f hf <;> infer_instance
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/ClosedImmersion.lean | 79 | 89 | theorem spec_of_surjective {R S : CommRingCat} (f : R ⟶ S) (h : Function.Surjective f) :
IsClosedImmersion (Scheme.specMap f) where
base_closed := PrimeSpectrum.closedEmbedding_comap_of_surjective _ _ h
surj_on_stalks x := by |
erw [← localRingHom_comp_stalkIso, CommRingCat.coe_comp, CommRingCat.coe_comp]
apply Function.Surjective.comp (Function.Surjective.comp _ _) _
· exact (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso (StructureSheaf.stalkIso S x).inv).2
· exact surjective_localRingHom_of_surjective f h x.asIdeal
· let g := (StructureSheaf.stalkIso ((CommRingCat.of R))
((PrimeSpectrum.comap (CommRingCat.ofHom f)) x)).hom
exact (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso g).2
| 7 | 1,096.633158 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,442 |
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.OpenImmersion
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
class IsClosedImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
base_closed : ClosedEmbedding f.1.base
surj_on_stalks : ∀ x, Function.Surjective (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x)
namespace IsClosedImmersion
lemma closedEmbedding {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsClosedImmersion f] : ClosedEmbedding f.1.base :=
IsClosedImmersion.base_closed
lemma surjective_stalkMap {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsClosedImmersion f] (x : X) : Function.Surjective (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x) :=
IsClosedImmersion.surj_on_stalks x
instance {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsClosedImmersion f where
base_closed := Homeomorph.closedEmbedding <| TopCat.homeoOfIso (asIso f.1.base)
surj_on_stalks := fun _ ↦ (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso _).2
instance : MorphismProperty.IsMultiplicative @IsClosedImmersion where
id_mem _ := inferInstance
comp_mem {X Y Z} f g hf hg := by
refine ⟨hg.base_closed.comp hf.base_closed, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
erw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
exact (hf.surj_on_stalks x).comp (hg.surj_on_stalks (f.1.1 x))
instance comp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsClosedImmersion f]
[IsClosedImmersion g] : IsClosedImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition.comp_mem f g inferInstance inferInstance
lemma respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @IsClosedImmersion := by
constructor <;> intro X Y Z e f hf <;> infer_instance
theorem spec_of_surjective {R S : CommRingCat} (f : R ⟶ S) (h : Function.Surjective f) :
IsClosedImmersion (Scheme.specMap f) where
base_closed := PrimeSpectrum.closedEmbedding_comap_of_surjective _ _ h
surj_on_stalks x := by
erw [← localRingHom_comp_stalkIso, CommRingCat.coe_comp, CommRingCat.coe_comp]
apply Function.Surjective.comp (Function.Surjective.comp _ _) _
· exact (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso (StructureSheaf.stalkIso S x).inv).2
· exact surjective_localRingHom_of_surjective f h x.asIdeal
· let g := (StructureSheaf.stalkIso ((CommRingCat.of R))
((PrimeSpectrum.comap (CommRingCat.ofHom f)) x)).hom
exact (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso g).2
instance spec_of_quotient_mk {R : CommRingCat.{u}} (I : Ideal R) :
IsClosedImmersion (Scheme.specMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (Ideal.Quotient.mk I))) :=
spec_of_surjective _ Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/ClosedImmersion.lean | 98 | 112 | theorem of_comp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsClosedImmersion g]
[IsClosedImmersion (f ≫ g)] : IsClosedImmersion f where
base_closed := by |
have h := closedEmbedding (f ≫ g)
rw [Scheme.comp_val_base] at h
apply closedEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_closed (Scheme.Hom.continuous f)
· exact Function.Injective.of_comp h.inj
· intro Z hZ
rw [ClosedEmbedding.closed_iff_image_closed (closedEmbedding g),
← Set.image_comp]
exact ClosedEmbedding.isClosedMap h _ hZ
surj_on_stalks x := by
have h := surjective_stalkMap (f ≫ g) x
erw [Scheme.comp_val, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp] at h
exact Function.Surjective.of_comp h
| 12 | 162,754.791419 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,442 |
import Batteries.Classes.SatisfiesM
namespace Array
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Array/Monadic.lean | 18 | 30 | theorem SatisfiesM_foldlM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat → β → Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive 0 init) {f : β → α → m β}
(hf : ∀ i : Fin as.size, ∀ b, motive i.1 b → SatisfiesM (motive (i.1 + 1)) (f b as[i])) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (as.foldlM f init) := by |
let rec go {i j b} (h₁ : j ≤ as.size) (h₂ : as.size ≤ i + j) (H : motive j b) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (foldlM.loop f as as.size (Nat.le_refl _) i j b) := by
unfold foldlM.loop; split
· next hj =>
split
· cases Nat.not_le_of_gt (by simp [hj]) h₂
· exact (hf ⟨j, hj⟩ b H).bind fun _ => go hj (by rwa [Nat.succ_add] at h₂)
· next hj => exact Nat.le_antisymm h₁ (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ .pure H
simp [foldlM]; exact go (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.le_refl _) h0
| 9 | 8,103.083928 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,443 |
import Batteries.Classes.SatisfiesM
namespace Array
theorem SatisfiesM_foldlM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat → β → Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive 0 init) {f : β → α → m β}
(hf : ∀ i : Fin as.size, ∀ b, motive i.1 b → SatisfiesM (motive (i.1 + 1)) (f b as[i])) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (as.foldlM f init) := by
let rec go {i j b} (h₁ : j ≤ as.size) (h₂ : as.size ≤ i + j) (H : motive j b) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (foldlM.loop f as as.size (Nat.le_refl _) i j b) := by
unfold foldlM.loop; split
· next hj =>
split
· cases Nat.not_le_of_gt (by simp [hj]) h₂
· exact (hf ⟨j, hj⟩ b H).bind fun _ => go hj (by rwa [Nat.succ_add] at h₂)
· next hj => exact Nat.le_antisymm h₁ (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ .pure H
simp [foldlM]; exact go (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.le_refl _) h0
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Array/Monadic.lean | 32 | 48 | theorem SatisfiesM_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(motive : Nat → Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, motive i.1 → SatisfiesM (p i · ∧ motive (i + 1)) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => motive as.size ∧ ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) := by |
rw [mapM_eq_foldlM]
refine SatisfiesM_foldlM (m := m) (β := Array β)
(motive := fun i arr => motive i ∧ arr.size = i ∧ ∀ i h2, p i (arr[i.1]'h2)) ?z ?s
|>.imp fun ⟨h₁, eq, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, eq, fun _ _ => h₂ ..⟩
· case z => exact ⟨h0, rfl, nofun⟩
· case s =>
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ arr ⟨ih₁, eq, ih₂⟩
refine (hs _ ih₁).map fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, by simp [eq], fun j hj => ?_⟩
simp [get_push] at hj ⊢; split; {apply ih₂}
cases j; cases (Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ hj).resolve_left ‹_›; cases eq; exact h₁
| 10 | 22,026.465795 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,443 |
import Batteries.Classes.SatisfiesM
namespace Array
theorem SatisfiesM_foldlM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat → β → Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive 0 init) {f : β → α → m β}
(hf : ∀ i : Fin as.size, ∀ b, motive i.1 b → SatisfiesM (motive (i.1 + 1)) (f b as[i])) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (as.foldlM f init) := by
let rec go {i j b} (h₁ : j ≤ as.size) (h₂ : as.size ≤ i + j) (H : motive j b) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (foldlM.loop f as as.size (Nat.le_refl _) i j b) := by
unfold foldlM.loop; split
· next hj =>
split
· cases Nat.not_le_of_gt (by simp [hj]) h₂
· exact (hf ⟨j, hj⟩ b H).bind fun _ => go hj (by rwa [Nat.succ_add] at h₂)
· next hj => exact Nat.le_antisymm h₁ (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ .pure H
simp [foldlM]; exact go (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.le_refl _) h0
theorem SatisfiesM_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(motive : Nat → Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, motive i.1 → SatisfiesM (p i · ∧ motive (i + 1)) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => motive as.size ∧ ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) := by
rw [mapM_eq_foldlM]
refine SatisfiesM_foldlM (m := m) (β := Array β)
(motive := fun i arr => motive i ∧ arr.size = i ∧ ∀ i h2, p i (arr[i.1]'h2)) ?z ?s
|>.imp fun ⟨h₁, eq, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, eq, fun _ _ => h₂ ..⟩
· case z => exact ⟨h0, rfl, nofun⟩
· case s =>
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ arr ⟨ih₁, eq, ih₂⟩
refine (hs _ ih₁).map fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, by simp [eq], fun j hj => ?_⟩
simp [get_push] at hj ⊢; split; {apply ih₂}
cases j; cases (Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ hj).resolve_left ‹_›; cases eq; exact h₁
theorem SatisfiesM_mapM' [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, SatisfiesM (p i) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) :=
(SatisfiesM_mapM _ _ (fun _ => True) trivial _ (fun _ h => (hs _).imp (⟨·, h⟩))).imp (·.2)
theorem size_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) :
SatisfiesM (fun arr => arr.size = as.size) (Array.mapM f as) :=
(SatisfiesM_mapM' _ _ (fun _ _ => True) (fun _ => .trivial)).imp (·.1)
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Array/Monadic.lean | 62 | 83 | theorem SatisfiesM_anyM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop)
(hstart : start ≤ min stop as.size) (tru : Prop) (fal : Nat → Prop) (h0 : fal start)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, i.1 < stop → fal i.1 →
SatisfiesM (bif · then tru else fal (i + 1)) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => bif res then tru else fal (min stop as.size))
(anyM p as start stop) := by |
let rec go {stop j} (hj' : j ≤ stop) (hstop : stop ≤ as.size) (h0 : fal j)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, i.1 < stop → fal i.1 →
SatisfiesM (bif · then tru else fal (i + 1)) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => bif res then tru else fal stop)
(anyM.loop p as stop hstop j) := by
unfold anyM.loop; split
· next hj =>
exact (hp ⟨j, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj hstop⟩ hj h0).bind fun
| true, h => .pure h
| false, h => go hj hstop h hp
· next hj => exact .pure <| Nat.le_antisymm hj' (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ h0
termination_by stop - j
simp only [Array.anyM_eq_anyM_loop]
exact go hstart _ h0 fun i hi => hp i <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hi <| Nat.min_le_left ..
| 15 | 3,269,017.372472 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,443 |
import Batteries.Classes.SatisfiesM
namespace Array
theorem SatisfiesM_foldlM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat → β → Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive 0 init) {f : β → α → m β}
(hf : ∀ i : Fin as.size, ∀ b, motive i.1 b → SatisfiesM (motive (i.1 + 1)) (f b as[i])) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (as.foldlM f init) := by
let rec go {i j b} (h₁ : j ≤ as.size) (h₂ : as.size ≤ i + j) (H : motive j b) :
SatisfiesM (motive as.size) (foldlM.loop f as as.size (Nat.le_refl _) i j b) := by
unfold foldlM.loop; split
· next hj =>
split
· cases Nat.not_le_of_gt (by simp [hj]) h₂
· exact (hf ⟨j, hj⟩ b H).bind fun _ => go hj (by rwa [Nat.succ_add] at h₂)
· next hj => exact Nat.le_antisymm h₁ (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ .pure H
simp [foldlM]; exact go (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.le_refl _) h0
theorem SatisfiesM_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(motive : Nat → Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, motive i.1 → SatisfiesM (p i · ∧ motive (i + 1)) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => motive as.size ∧ ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) := by
rw [mapM_eq_foldlM]
refine SatisfiesM_foldlM (m := m) (β := Array β)
(motive := fun i arr => motive i ∧ arr.size = i ∧ ∀ i h2, p i (arr[i.1]'h2)) ?z ?s
|>.imp fun ⟨h₁, eq, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁, eq, fun _ _ => h₂ ..⟩
· case z => exact ⟨h0, rfl, nofun⟩
· case s =>
intro ⟨i, hi⟩ arr ⟨ih₁, eq, ih₂⟩
refine (hs _ ih₁).map fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, by simp [eq], fun j hj => ?_⟩
simp [get_push] at hj ⊢; split; {apply ih₂}
cases j; cases (Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ hj).resolve_left ‹_›; cases eq; exact h₁
theorem SatisfiesM_mapM' [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (as : Array α) (f : α → m β)
(p : Fin as.size → β → Prop)
(hs : ∀ i, SatisfiesM (p i) (f as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun arr => ∃ eq : arr.size = as.size, ∀ i h, p ⟨i, h⟩ arr[i])
(Array.mapM f as) :=
(SatisfiesM_mapM _ _ (fun _ => True) trivial _ (fun _ h => (hs _).imp (⟨·, h⟩))).imp (·.2)
theorem size_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) :
SatisfiesM (fun arr => arr.size = as.size) (Array.mapM f as) :=
(SatisfiesM_mapM' _ _ (fun _ _ => True) (fun _ => .trivial)).imp (·.1)
theorem SatisfiesM_anyM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop)
(hstart : start ≤ min stop as.size) (tru : Prop) (fal : Nat → Prop) (h0 : fal start)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, i.1 < stop → fal i.1 →
SatisfiesM (bif · then tru else fal (i + 1)) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => bif res then tru else fal (min stop as.size))
(anyM p as start stop) := by
let rec go {stop j} (hj' : j ≤ stop) (hstop : stop ≤ as.size) (h0 : fal j)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, i.1 < stop → fal i.1 →
SatisfiesM (bif · then tru else fal (i + 1)) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => bif res then tru else fal stop)
(anyM.loop p as stop hstop j) := by
unfold anyM.loop; split
· next hj =>
exact (hp ⟨j, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj hstop⟩ hj h0).bind fun
| true, h => .pure h
| false, h => go hj hstop h hp
· next hj => exact .pure <| Nat.le_antisymm hj' (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) ▸ h0
termination_by stop - j
simp only [Array.anyM_eq_anyM_loop]
exact go hstart _ h0 fun i hi => hp i <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hi <| Nat.min_le_left ..
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/Array/Monadic.lean | 85 | 110 | theorem SatisfiesM_anyM_iff_exists [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) (q : Fin as.size → Prop)
(hp : ∀ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 → i.1 < stop → SatisfiesM (· = true ↔ q i) (p as[i])) :
SatisfiesM
(fun res => res = true ↔ ∃ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < stop ∧ q i)
(anyM p as start stop) := by |
cases Nat.le_total start (min stop as.size) with
| inl hstart =>
refine (SatisfiesM_anyM _ _ _ _ hstart
(fal := fun j => start ≤ j ∧ ¬ ∃ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < j ∧ q i)
(tru := ∃ i : Fin as.size, start ≤ i.1 ∧ i.1 < stop ∧ q i) ?_ ?_).imp ?_
· exact ⟨Nat.le_refl _, fun ⟨i, h₁, h₂, _⟩ => (Nat.not_le_of_gt h₂ h₁).elim⟩
· refine fun i h₂ ⟨h₁, h₃⟩ => (hp _ h₁ h₂).imp fun hq => ?_
unfold cond; split <;> simp at hq
· exact ⟨_, h₁, h₂, hq⟩
· refine ⟨Nat.le_succ_of_le h₁, h₃.imp fun ⟨j, h₃, h₄, h₅⟩ => ⟨j, h₃, ?_, h₅⟩⟩
refine Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h₄) fun e => hq (Fin.eq_of_val_eq e ▸ h₅)
· intro
| true, h => simp only [true_iff]; exact h
| false, h =>
simp only [false_iff]
exact h.2.imp fun ⟨j, h₁, h₂, hq⟩ => ⟨j, h₁, Nat.lt_min.2 ⟨h₂, j.2⟩, hq⟩
| inr hstart =>
rw [anyM_stop_le_start (h := hstart)]
refine .pure ?_; simp; intro j h₁ h₂
cases Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_trans hstart h₁) (Nat.lt_min.2 ⟨h₂, j.2⟩)
| 20 | 485,165,195.40979 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,443 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.indicator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α 𝕜 E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Indicator.lean | 38 | 59 | theorem condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0 := by |
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
have : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict s).trim hm) := by
rw [← restrict_trim hm _ hs]
exact Restrict.sigmaFinite _ s
by_cases hf_int : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf_int]
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun t _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn.integrableOn
· exact fun t _ _ => (integrable_zero _ _ _).integrableOn
· intro t ht _
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht), setIntegral_condexp hm hf_int (ht.inter hs), ←
Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht)]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (hm _ ht) ?_
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx _ using hx
· exact stronglyMeasurable_condexp.aeStronglyMeasurable'
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero.aeStronglyMeasurable'
| 20 | 485,165,195.40979 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,444 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.indicator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α 𝕜 E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
theorem condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
have : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict s).trim hm) := by
rw [← restrict_trim hm _ hs]
exact Restrict.sigmaFinite _ s
by_cases hf_int : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf_int]
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun t _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn.integrableOn
· exact fun t _ _ => (integrable_zero _ _ _).integrableOn
· intro t ht _
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht), setIntegral_condexp hm hf_int (ht.inter hs), ←
Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht)]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (hm _ ht) ?_
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx _ using hx
· exact stronglyMeasurable_condexp.aeStronglyMeasurable'
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero.aeStronglyMeasurable'
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Indicator.lean | 63 | 70 | theorem condexp_indicator_aux (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) :
μ[s.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[f|m]) := by |
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
have hsf_zero : ∀ g : α → E, g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 → s.indicator g =ᵐ[μ] g := fun g =>
indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hm _ hs)
refine ((hsf_zero (μ[f|m]) (condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero hs.compl hf)).trans ?_).symm
exact condexp_congr_ae (hsf_zero f hf).symm
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,444 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.indicator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α 𝕜 E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
theorem condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
have : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict s).trim hm) := by
rw [← restrict_trim hm _ hs]
exact Restrict.sigmaFinite _ s
by_cases hf_int : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf_int]
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun t _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn.integrableOn
· exact fun t _ _ => (integrable_zero _ _ _).integrableOn
· intro t ht _
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht), setIntegral_condexp hm hf_int (ht.inter hs), ←
Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht)]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (hm _ ht) ?_
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx _ using hx
· exact stronglyMeasurable_condexp.aeStronglyMeasurable'
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero.aeStronglyMeasurable'
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero
theorem condexp_indicator_aux (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) :
μ[s.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
have hsf_zero : ∀ g : α → E, g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 → s.indicator g =ᵐ[μ] g := fun g =>
indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hm _ hs)
refine ((hsf_zero (μ[f|m]) (condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero hs.compl hf)).trans ?_).symm
exact condexp_congr_ae (hsf_zero f hf).symm
#align measure_theory.condexp_indicator_aux MeasureTheory.condexp_indicator_aux
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Indicator.lean | 75 | 112 | theorem condexp_indicator (hf_int : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) :
μ[s.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[f|m]) := by |
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
-- use `have` to perform what should be the first calc step because of an error I don't
-- understand
have : s.indicator (μ[f|m]) =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f + sᶜ.indicator f|m]) := by
rw [Set.indicator_self_add_compl s f]
refine (this.trans ?_).symm
calc
s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f + sᶜ.indicator f|m]) =ᵐ[μ]
s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m] + μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m]) := by
have : μ[s.indicator f + sᶜ.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[s.indicator f|m] + μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m] :=
condexp_add (hf_int.indicator (hm _ hs)) (hf_int.indicator (hm _ hs.compl))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
classical rw [Set.indicator_apply, Set.indicator_apply, hx]
_ = s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m]) + s.indicator (μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m]) :=
(s.indicator_add' _ _)
_ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m]) +
s.indicator (sᶜ.indicator (μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m])) := by
refine Filter.EventuallyEq.rfl.add ?_
have : sᶜ.indicator (μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m]) =ᵐ[μ] μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m] := by
refine (condexp_indicator_aux hs.compl ?_).symm.trans ?_
· exact indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hm _ hs.compl)
· rw [Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_self]
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hx, hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp only [hxs, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]
_ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m]) := by
rw [Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_compl_self, Set.indicator_empty', add_zero]
_ =ᵐ[μ] μ[s.indicator f|m] := by
refine (condexp_indicator_aux hs ?_).symm.trans ?_
· exact indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hm _ hs)
· rw [Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_self]
| 36 | 4,311,231,547,115,195 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,444 |
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.indicator from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α 𝕜 E : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
theorem condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0) :
μ[f|m] =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] 0 := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm]; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm]; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
have : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict s).trim hm) := by
rw [← restrict_trim hm _ hs]
exact Restrict.sigmaFinite _ s
by_cases hf_int : Integrable f μ
swap; · rw [condexp_undef hf_int]
refine ae_eq_of_forall_setIntegral_eq_of_sigmaFinite' hm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun t _ _ => integrable_condexp.integrableOn.integrableOn
· exact fun t _ _ => (integrable_zero _ _ _).integrableOn
· intro t ht _
rw [Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht), setIntegral_condexp hm hf_int (ht.inter hs), ←
Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht)]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (hm _ ht) ?_
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx _ using hx
· exact stronglyMeasurable_condexp.aeStronglyMeasurable'
· exact stronglyMeasurable_zero.aeStronglyMeasurable'
#align measure_theory.condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero MeasureTheory.condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero
theorem condexp_indicator_aux (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) :
μ[s.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
have hsf_zero : ∀ g : α → E, g =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0 → s.indicator g =ᵐ[μ] g := fun g =>
indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hm _ hs)
refine ((hsf_zero (μ[f|m]) (condexp_ae_eq_restrict_zero hs.compl hf)).trans ?_).symm
exact condexp_congr_ae (hsf_zero f hf).symm
#align measure_theory.condexp_indicator_aux MeasureTheory.condexp_indicator_aux
theorem condexp_indicator (hf_int : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) :
μ[s.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[f|m]) := by
by_cases hm : m ≤ m0
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_le hm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
by_cases hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)
swap; · simp_rw [condexp_of_not_sigmaFinite hm hμm, Set.indicator_zero']; rfl
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm) := hμm
-- use `have` to perform what should be the first calc step because of an error I don't
-- understand
have : s.indicator (μ[f|m]) =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f + sᶜ.indicator f|m]) := by
rw [Set.indicator_self_add_compl s f]
refine (this.trans ?_).symm
calc
s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f + sᶜ.indicator f|m]) =ᵐ[μ]
s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m] + μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m]) := by
have : μ[s.indicator f + sᶜ.indicator f|m] =ᵐ[μ] μ[s.indicator f|m] + μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m] :=
condexp_add (hf_int.indicator (hm _ hs)) (hf_int.indicator (hm _ hs.compl))
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
classical rw [Set.indicator_apply, Set.indicator_apply, hx]
_ = s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m]) + s.indicator (μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m]) :=
(s.indicator_add' _ _)
_ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m]) +
s.indicator (sᶜ.indicator (μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m])) := by
refine Filter.EventuallyEq.rfl.add ?_
have : sᶜ.indicator (μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m]) =ᵐ[μ] μ[sᶜ.indicator f|m] := by
refine (condexp_indicator_aux hs.compl ?_).symm.trans ?_
· exact indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hm _ hs.compl)
· rw [Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_self]
filter_upwards [this] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [hx, hxs, Set.indicator_of_mem]
· simp only [hxs, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]
_ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator (μ[s.indicator f|m]) := by
rw [Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_compl_self, Set.indicator_empty', add_zero]
_ =ᵐ[μ] μ[s.indicator f|m] := by
refine (condexp_indicator_aux hs ?_).symm.trans ?_
· exact indicator_ae_eq_restrict_compl (hm _ hs)
· rw [Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_self]
#align measure_theory.condexp_indicator MeasureTheory.condexp_indicator
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Indicator.lean | 115 | 140 | theorem condexp_restrict_ae_eq_restrict (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
(hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hf_int : Integrable f μ) :
(μ.restrict s)[f|m] =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] μ[f|m] := by |
have : SigmaFinite ((μ.restrict s).trim hm) := by rw [← restrict_trim hm _ hs_m]; infer_instance
rw [ae_eq_restrict_iff_indicator_ae_eq (hm _ hs_m)]
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (condexp_indicator hf_int hs_m)
refine ae_eq_condexp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm (hf_int.indicator (hm _ hs_m)) ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro t ht _
rw [← integrable_indicator_iff (hm _ ht), Set.indicator_indicator, Set.inter_comm, ←
Set.indicator_indicator]
suffices h_int_restrict : Integrable (t.indicator ((μ.restrict s)[f|m])) (μ.restrict s) by
rw [integrable_indicator_iff (hm _ hs_m), IntegrableOn]
rw [integrable_indicator_iff (hm _ ht), IntegrableOn] at h_int_restrict ⊢
exact h_int_restrict
exact integrable_condexp.indicator (hm _ ht)
· intro t ht _
calc
∫ x in t, s.indicator ((μ.restrict s)[f|m]) x ∂μ =
∫ x in t, ((μ.restrict s)[f|m]) x ∂μ.restrict s := by
rw [integral_indicator (hm _ hs_m), Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ hs_m),
Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht), Set.inter_comm]
_ = ∫ x in t, f x ∂μ.restrict s := setIntegral_condexp hm hf_int.integrableOn ht
_ = ∫ x in t, s.indicator f x ∂μ := by
rw [integral_indicator (hm _ hs_m), Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ hs_m),
Measure.restrict_restrict (hm _ ht), Set.inter_comm]
· exact (stronglyMeasurable_condexp.indicator hs_m).aeStronglyMeasurable'
| 23 | 9,744,803,446.248903 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2,444 |
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Induced
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
open Function Set Filter Topology
universe u v w
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u}
inductive GenerateOpen (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ s ∈ g, GenerateOpen g s
| univ : GenerateOpen g univ
| inter : ∀ s t, GenerateOpen g s → GenerateOpen g t → GenerateOpen g (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, GenerateOpen g s) → GenerateOpen g (⋃₀ S)
#align topological_space.generate_open TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen
def generateFrom (g : Set (Set α)) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen := GenerateOpen g
isOpen_univ := GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := GenerateOpen.sUnion
#align topological_space.generate_from TopologicalSpace.generateFrom
theorem isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem {g : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ g) :
IsOpen[generateFrom g] s :=
GenerateOpen.basic s hs
#align topological_space.is_open_generate_from_of_mem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem
| Mathlib/Topology/Order.lean | 78 | 90 | theorem nhds_generateFrom {g : Set (Set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generateFrom g) a = ⨅ s ∈ { s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g }, 𝓟 s := by |
letI := generateFrom g
rw [nhds_def]
refine le_antisymm (biInf_mono fun s ⟨as, sg⟩ => ⟨as, .basic _ sg⟩) <| le_iInf₂ ?_
rintro s ⟨ha, hs⟩
induction hs with
| basic _ hs => exact iInf₂_le _ ⟨ha, hs⟩
| univ => exact le_top.trans_eq principal_univ.symm
| inter _ _ _ _ hs ht => exact (le_inf (hs ha.1) (ht ha.2)).trans_eq inf_principal
| sUnion _ _ hS =>
let ⟨t, htS, hat⟩ := ha
exact (hS t htS hat).trans (principal_mono.2 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem htS)
| 11 | 59,874.141715 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,445 |
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Induced
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
open Function Set Filter Topology
universe u v w
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u}
inductive GenerateOpen (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ s ∈ g, GenerateOpen g s
| univ : GenerateOpen g univ
| inter : ∀ s t, GenerateOpen g s → GenerateOpen g t → GenerateOpen g (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, GenerateOpen g s) → GenerateOpen g (⋃₀ S)
#align topological_space.generate_open TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen
def generateFrom (g : Set (Set α)) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen := GenerateOpen g
isOpen_univ := GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := GenerateOpen.sUnion
#align topological_space.generate_from TopologicalSpace.generateFrom
theorem isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem {g : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ g) :
IsOpen[generateFrom g] s :=
GenerateOpen.basic s hs
#align topological_space.is_open_generate_from_of_mem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem
theorem nhds_generateFrom {g : Set (Set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generateFrom g) a = ⨅ s ∈ { s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g }, 𝓟 s := by
letI := generateFrom g
rw [nhds_def]
refine le_antisymm (biInf_mono fun s ⟨as, sg⟩ => ⟨as, .basic _ sg⟩) <| le_iInf₂ ?_
rintro s ⟨ha, hs⟩
induction hs with
| basic _ hs => exact iInf₂_le _ ⟨ha, hs⟩
| univ => exact le_top.trans_eq principal_univ.symm
| inter _ _ _ _ hs ht => exact (le_inf (hs ha.1) (ht ha.2)).trans_eq inf_principal
| sUnion _ _ hS =>
let ⟨t, htS, hat⟩ := ha
exact (hS t htS hat).trans (principal_mono.2 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem htS)
#align topological_space.nhds_generate_from TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom
lemma tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Set (Set β)}
{b : β} : Tendsto m f (@nhds β (generateFrom g) b) ↔ ∀ s ∈ g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f := by
simp only [nhds_generateFrom, @forall_swap (b ∈ _), tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
tendsto_principal]; rfl
@[deprecated] alias ⟨_, tendsto_nhds_generateFrom⟩ := tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff
#align topological_space.tendsto_nhds_generate_from TopologicalSpace.tendsto_nhds_generateFrom
protected def mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := ∀ a ∈ s, s ∈ n a
isOpen_univ _ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩ => inter_mem (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _s hs _a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hx)
#align topological_space.mk_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Order.lean | 110 | 121 | theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis {n : α → Filter α} {ι : α → Sort*} {p : ∀ a, ι a → Prop}
{s : ∀ a, ι a → Set α} (hb : ∀ a, (n a).HasBasis (p a) (s a))
(hpure : ∀ a i, p a i → a ∈ s a i) (hopen : ∀ a i, p a i → ∀ᶠ x in n a, s a i ∈ n x) (a : α) :
@nhds α (.mkOfNhds n) a = n a := by |
let t : TopologicalSpace α := .mkOfNhds n
apply le_antisymm
· intro U hU
replace hpure : pure ≤ n := fun x ↦ (hb x).ge_iff.2 (hpure x)
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨{x | U ∈ n x}, fun x hx ↦ hpure x hx, fun x hx ↦ ?_, hU⟩
rcases (hb x).mem_iff.1 hx with ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩
exact (hopen x i hpi).mono fun y hy ↦ mem_of_superset hy hi
· exact (nhds_basis_opens a).ge_iff.2 fun U ⟨haU, hUo⟩ ↦ hUo a haU
| 8 | 2,980.957987 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,445 |
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Induced
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
open Function Set Filter Topology
universe u v w
namespace TopologicalSpace
variable {α : Type u}
inductive GenerateOpen (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic : ∀ s ∈ g, GenerateOpen g s
| univ : GenerateOpen g univ
| inter : ∀ s t, GenerateOpen g s → GenerateOpen g t → GenerateOpen g (s ∩ t)
| sUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), (∀ s ∈ S, GenerateOpen g s) → GenerateOpen g (⋃₀ S)
#align topological_space.generate_open TopologicalSpace.GenerateOpen
def generateFrom (g : Set (Set α)) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen := GenerateOpen g
isOpen_univ := GenerateOpen.univ
isOpen_inter := GenerateOpen.inter
isOpen_sUnion := GenerateOpen.sUnion
#align topological_space.generate_from TopologicalSpace.generateFrom
theorem isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem {g : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ g) :
IsOpen[generateFrom g] s :=
GenerateOpen.basic s hs
#align topological_space.is_open_generate_from_of_mem TopologicalSpace.isOpen_generateFrom_of_mem
theorem nhds_generateFrom {g : Set (Set α)} {a : α} :
@nhds α (generateFrom g) a = ⨅ s ∈ { s | a ∈ s ∧ s ∈ g }, 𝓟 s := by
letI := generateFrom g
rw [nhds_def]
refine le_antisymm (biInf_mono fun s ⟨as, sg⟩ => ⟨as, .basic _ sg⟩) <| le_iInf₂ ?_
rintro s ⟨ha, hs⟩
induction hs with
| basic _ hs => exact iInf₂_le _ ⟨ha, hs⟩
| univ => exact le_top.trans_eq principal_univ.symm
| inter _ _ _ _ hs ht => exact (le_inf (hs ha.1) (ht ha.2)).trans_eq inf_principal
| sUnion _ _ hS =>
let ⟨t, htS, hat⟩ := ha
exact (hS t htS hat).trans (principal_mono.2 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem htS)
#align topological_space.nhds_generate_from TopologicalSpace.nhds_generateFrom
lemma tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff {β : Type*} {m : α → β} {f : Filter α} {g : Set (Set β)}
{b : β} : Tendsto m f (@nhds β (generateFrom g) b) ↔ ∀ s ∈ g, b ∈ s → m ⁻¹' s ∈ f := by
simp only [nhds_generateFrom, @forall_swap (b ∈ _), tendsto_iInf, mem_setOf_eq, and_imp,
tendsto_principal]; rfl
@[deprecated] alias ⟨_, tendsto_nhds_generateFrom⟩ := tendsto_nhds_generateFrom_iff
#align topological_space.tendsto_nhds_generate_from TopologicalSpace.tendsto_nhds_generateFrom
protected def mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) : TopologicalSpace α where
IsOpen s := ∀ a ∈ s, s ∈ n a
isOpen_univ _ _ := univ_mem
isOpen_inter := fun _s _t hs ht x ⟨hxs, hxt⟩ => inter_mem (hs x hxs) (ht x hxt)
isOpen_sUnion := fun _s hs _a ⟨x, hx, hxa⟩ =>
mem_of_superset (hs x hx _ hxa) (subset_sUnion_of_mem hx)
#align topological_space.mk_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis {n : α → Filter α} {ι : α → Sort*} {p : ∀ a, ι a → Prop}
{s : ∀ a, ι a → Set α} (hb : ∀ a, (n a).HasBasis (p a) (s a))
(hpure : ∀ a i, p a i → a ∈ s a i) (hopen : ∀ a i, p a i → ∀ᶠ x in n a, s a i ∈ n x) (a : α) :
@nhds α (.mkOfNhds n) a = n a := by
let t : TopologicalSpace α := .mkOfNhds n
apply le_antisymm
· intro U hU
replace hpure : pure ≤ n := fun x ↦ (hb x).ge_iff.2 (hpure x)
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨{x | U ∈ n x}, fun x hx ↦ hpure x hx, fun x hx ↦ ?_, hU⟩
rcases (hb x).mem_iff.1 hx with ⟨i, hpi, hi⟩
exact (hopen x i hpi).mono fun y hy ↦ mem_of_superset hy hi
· exact (nhds_basis_opens a).ge_iff.2 fun U ⟨haU, hUo⟩ ↦ hUo a haU
theorem nhds_mkOfNhds (n : α → Filter α) (a : α) (h₀ : pure ≤ n)
(h₁ : ∀ a, ∀ s ∈ n a, ∀ᶠ y in n a, s ∈ n y) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds n) a = n a :=
nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun a ↦ (n a).basis_sets) h₀ h₁ _
#align topological_space.nhds_mk_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Order.lean | 129 | 138 | theorem nhds_mkOfNhds_single [DecidableEq α] {a₀ : α} {l : Filter α} (h : pure a₀ ≤ l) (b : α) :
@nhds α (TopologicalSpace.mkOfNhds (update pure a₀ l)) b =
(update pure a₀ l : α → Filter α) b := by |
refine nhds_mkOfNhds _ _ (le_update_iff.mpr ⟨h, fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩) fun a s hs => ?_
rcases eq_or_ne a a₀ with (rfl | ha)
· filter_upwards [hs] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne b a with (rfl | hb)
· exact hs
· rwa [update_noteq hb]
· simpa only [update_noteq ha, mem_pure, eventually_pure] using hs
| 7 | 1,096.633158 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,445 |
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ExtendFrom
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LocalExtr
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import analysis.calculus.local_extr from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
open Filter Set Topology
variable {X Y : Type*}
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder X] [DenselyOrdered X] [TopologicalSpace X] [OrderTopology X]
[LinearOrder Y] [TopologicalSpace Y] [OrderTopology Y]
{f : X → Y} {a b : X} {l : Y}
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Order/Rolle.lean | 37 | 55 | theorem exists_Ioo_extr_on_Icc (hab : a < b) (hfc : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hfI : f a = f b) :
∃ c ∈ Ioo a b, IsExtrOn f (Icc a b) c := by |
have ne : (Icc a b).Nonempty := nonempty_Icc.2 (le_of_lt hab)
-- Consider absolute min and max points
obtain ⟨c, cmem, cle⟩ : ∃ c ∈ Icc a b, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f c ≤ f x :=
isCompact_Icc.exists_isMinOn ne hfc
obtain ⟨C, Cmem, Cge⟩ : ∃ C ∈ Icc a b, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x ≤ f C :=
isCompact_Icc.exists_isMaxOn ne hfc
by_cases hc : f c = f a
· by_cases hC : f C = f a
· have : ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, f x = f a := fun x hx => le_antisymm (hC ▸ Cge x hx) (hc ▸ cle x hx)
-- `f` is a constant, so we can take any point in `Ioo a b`
rcases nonempty_Ioo.2 hab with ⟨c', hc'⟩
refine ⟨c', hc', Or.inl fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, this x hx, this c' (Ioo_subset_Icc_self hc'), le_rfl]
· refine ⟨C, ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne Cmem.1 <| mt ?_ hC, lt_of_le_of_ne Cmem.2 <| mt ?_ hC⟩, Or.inr Cge⟩
exacts [fun h => by rw [h], fun h => by rw [h, hfI]]
· refine ⟨c, ⟨lt_of_le_of_ne cmem.1 <| mt ?_ hc, lt_of_le_of_ne cmem.2 <| mt ?_ hc⟩, Or.inl cle⟩
exacts [fun h => by rw [h], fun h => by rw [h, hfI]]
| 17 | 24,154,952.753575 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,446 |
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.EqualizerSheafCondition
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
def IsSheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike in
def IsSeparated (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) [ConcreteCategory A] : Prop :=
∀ (X : C) (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ J X) (x y : P.obj (op X)),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : S f), P.map f.op x = P.map f.op y) → x = y
section LimitSheafCondition
open Presieve Presieve.FamilyOfElements Limits
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) {X : C} (S : Sieve X) (R : Presieve X) (E : Aᵒᵖ)
@[simps]
def conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily :
(S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P).cones.obj E ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) (S : Presieve X) // x.SieveCompatible } where
toFun π :=
⟨fun Y f h => π.app (op ⟨Over.mk f, h⟩), fun X Y f g hf => by
apply (id_comp _).symm.trans
dsimp
exact π.naturality (Quiver.Hom.op (Over.homMk _ (by rfl)))⟩
invFun x :=
{ app := fun f => x.1 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2
naturality := fun f f' g => by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (x.2 f.unop.1.hom g.unop.left f.unop.2)
dsimp
rw [id_comp]
convert rfl
rw [Over.w] }
left_inv π := rfl
right_inv x := rfl
#align category_theory.presheaf.cones_equiv_sieve_compatible_family CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily
-- These lemmas have always been bad (#7657), but leanprover/lean4#2644 made `simp` start noticing
attribute [nolint simpNF] CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily_apply_coe
CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily_symm_apply_app
variable {P S E} {x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows} (hx : SieveCompatible x)
@[simp]
def _root_.CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone :
Cone (S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P) where
pt := E.unop
π := (conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S E).invFun ⟨x, hx⟩
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_compatible.cone CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone
def homEquivAmalgamation :
(hx.cone ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op) ≃ { t // x.IsAmalgamation t } where
toFun l := ⟨l.hom, fun _ f hf => l.w (op ⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩)⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, fun f => t.2 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align category_theory.presheaf.hom_equiv_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presheaf.homEquivAmalgamation
variable (P S)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheaf.lean | 147 | 162 | theorem isLimit_iff_isSheafFor :
Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSheafFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows := by |
dsimp [IsSheafFor]; simp_rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
rw [((Cone.isLimitEquivIsTerminal _).trans (isTerminalEquivUnique _ _)).nonempty_congr]
rw [Classical.nonempty_pi]; constructor
· intro hu E x hx
specialize hu hx.cone
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation hx).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr] at hu
exact (unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique _).1 hu
· rintro h ⟨E, π⟩
let eqv := conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S (op E)
rw [← eqv.left_inv π]
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation (eqv π).2).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr]
rw [unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique]
exact h _ _ (eqv π).2
| 13 | 442,413.392009 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,447 |
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.EqualizerSheafCondition
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
def IsSheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike in
def IsSeparated (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) [ConcreteCategory A] : Prop :=
∀ (X : C) (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ J X) (x y : P.obj (op X)),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : S f), P.map f.op x = P.map f.op y) → x = y
section LimitSheafCondition
open Presieve Presieve.FamilyOfElements Limits
variable (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) {X : C} (S : Sieve X) (R : Presieve X) (E : Aᵒᵖ)
@[simps]
def conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily :
(S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P).cones.obj E ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) (S : Presieve X) // x.SieveCompatible } where
toFun π :=
⟨fun Y f h => π.app (op ⟨Over.mk f, h⟩), fun X Y f g hf => by
apply (id_comp _).symm.trans
dsimp
exact π.naturality (Quiver.Hom.op (Over.homMk _ (by rfl)))⟩
invFun x :=
{ app := fun f => x.1 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2
naturality := fun f f' g => by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (x.2 f.unop.1.hom g.unop.left f.unop.2)
dsimp
rw [id_comp]
convert rfl
rw [Over.w] }
left_inv π := rfl
right_inv x := rfl
#align category_theory.presheaf.cones_equiv_sieve_compatible_family CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily
-- These lemmas have always been bad (#7657), but leanprover/lean4#2644 made `simp` start noticing
attribute [nolint simpNF] CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily_apply_coe
CategoryTheory.Presheaf.conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily_symm_apply_app
variable {P S E} {x : FamilyOfElements (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows} (hx : SieveCompatible x)
@[simp]
def _root_.CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone :
Cone (S.arrows.diagram.op ⋙ P) where
pt := E.unop
π := (conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S E).invFun ⟨x, hx⟩
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_compatible.cone CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible.cone
def homEquivAmalgamation :
(hx.cone ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op) ≃ { t // x.IsAmalgamation t } where
toFun l := ⟨l.hom, fun _ f hf => l.w (op ⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩)⟩
invFun t := ⟨t.1, fun f => t.2 f.unop.1.hom f.unop.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align category_theory.presheaf.hom_equiv_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presheaf.homEquivAmalgamation
variable (P S)
theorem isLimit_iff_isSheafFor :
Nonempty (IsLimit (P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSheafFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows := by
dsimp [IsSheafFor]; simp_rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
rw [((Cone.isLimitEquivIsTerminal _).trans (isTerminalEquivUnique _ _)).nonempty_congr]
rw [Classical.nonempty_pi]; constructor
· intro hu E x hx
specialize hu hx.cone
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation hx).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr] at hu
exact (unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique _).1 hu
· rintro h ⟨E, π⟩
let eqv := conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S (op E)
rw [← eqv.left_inv π]
erw [(homEquivAmalgamation (eqv π).2).uniqueCongr.nonempty_congr]
rw [unique_subtype_iff_exists_unique]
exact h _ _ (eqv π).2
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_limit_iff_is_sheaf_for CategoryTheory.Presheaf.isLimit_iff_isSheafFor
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheaf.lean | 168 | 187 | theorem subsingleton_iff_isSeparatedFor :
(∀ c, Subsingleton (c ⟶ P.mapCone S.arrows.cocone.op)) ↔
∀ E : Aᵒᵖ, IsSeparatedFor (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj E) S.arrows := by |
constructor
· intro hs E x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂
have hx := is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation x ⟨t₁, h₁⟩
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at hx
specialize hs hx.cone
rcases hs with ⟨hs⟩
simpa only [Subtype.mk.injEq] using (show Subtype.mk t₁ h₁ = ⟨t₂, h₂⟩ from
(homEquivAmalgamation hx).symm.injective (hs _ _))
· rintro h ⟨E, π⟩
let eqv := conesEquivSieveCompatibleFamily P S (op E)
constructor
rw [← eqv.left_inv π]
intro f₁ f₂
let eqv' := homEquivAmalgamation (eqv π).2
apply eqv'.injective
ext
apply h _ (eqv π).1 <;> exact (eqv' _).2
| 17 | 24,154,952.753575 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,447 |
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.SheafOfTypes
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.EqualizerSheafCondition
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
universe w v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presheaf
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C)
-- We follow https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL definition 00VR
def IsSheaf (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) : Prop :=
∀ E : A, Presieve.IsSheaf J (P ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op E))
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike in
def IsSeparated (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A) [ConcreteCategory A] : Prop :=
∀ (X : C) (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ J X) (x y : P.obj (op X)),
(∀ (Y : C) (f : Y ⟶ X) (_ : S f), P.map f.op x = P.map f.op y) → x = y
variable {J}
def IsSheaf.amalgamate {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {E : A} {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A}
(hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) (S : J.Cover X) (x : ∀ I : S.Arrow, E ⟶ P.obj (op I.Y))
(hx : ∀ I : S.Relation, x I.fst ≫ P.map I.g₁.op = x I.snd ≫ P.map I.g₂.op) : E ⟶ P.obj (op X) :=
(hP _ _ S.condition).amalgamate (fun Y f hf => x ⟨Y, f, hf⟩) fun Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ w =>
hx ⟨Y₁, Y₂, Z, g₁, g₂, f₁, f₂, h₁, h₂, w⟩
#align category_theory.presheaf.is_sheaf.amalgamate CategoryTheory.Presheaf.IsSheaf.amalgamate
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sheaf.lean | 248 | 255 | theorem IsSheaf.amalgamate_map {A : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} A] {E : A} {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ A}
(hP : Presheaf.IsSheaf J P) (S : J.Cover X) (x : ∀ I : S.Arrow, E ⟶ P.obj (op I.Y))
(hx : ∀ I : S.Relation, x I.fst ≫ P.map I.g₁.op = x I.snd ≫ P.map I.g₂.op) (I : S.Arrow) :
hP.amalgamate S x hx ≫ P.map I.f.op = x _ := by |
rcases I with ⟨Y, f, hf⟩
apply
@Presieve.IsSheafFor.valid_glue _ _ _ _ _ _ (hP _ _ S.condition) (fun Y f hf => x ⟨Y, f, hf⟩)
(fun Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ w => hx ⟨Y₁, Y₂, Z, g₁, g₂, f₁, f₂, h₁, h₂, w⟩) f hf
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,447 |
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformGroup
#align_import topology.algebra.uniform_filter_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"531db2ef0fdddf8b3c8dcdcd87138fe969e1a81a"
open uniformity Filter
open Filter
namespace AddGroupFilterBasis
variable {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] (B : AddGroupFilterBasis G)
protected def uniformSpace : UniformSpace G :=
@TopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace G _ B.topology B.isTopologicalAddGroup
#align add_group_filter_basis.uniform_space AddGroupFilterBasis.uniformSpace
protected theorem uniformAddGroup : @UniformAddGroup G B.uniformSpace _ :=
@comm_topologicalAddGroup_is_uniform G _ B.topology B.isTopologicalAddGroup
#align add_group_filter_basis.uniform_add_group AddGroupFilterBasis.uniformAddGroup
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/UniformFilterBasis.lean | 42 | 51 | theorem cauchy_iff {F : Filter G} :
@Cauchy G B.uniformSpace F ↔
F.NeBot ∧ ∀ U ∈ B, ∃ M ∈ F, ∀ᵉ (x ∈ M) (y ∈ M), y - x ∈ U := by |
letI := B.uniformSpace
haveI := B.uniformAddGroup
suffices F ×ˢ F ≤ uniformity G ↔ ∀ U ∈ B, ∃ M ∈ F, ∀ᵉ (x ∈ M) (y ∈ M), y - x ∈ U by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨h', h⟩ <;> refine ⟨h', ?_⟩ <;> [rwa [← this]; rwa [this]]
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero G, ← map_le_iff_le_comap]
change Tendsto _ _ _ ↔ _
simp [(basis_sets F).prod_self.tendsto_iff B.nhds_zero_hasBasis, @forall_swap (_ ∈ _) G]
| 7 | 1,096.633158 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,448 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
namespace Finset
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f : ℕ → R) (g : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ}
-- The partial sum of `g`, starting from zero
local notation "G " n:80 => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Module.lean | 21 | 57 | theorem sum_Ico_by_parts (hmn : m < n) :
∑ i ∈ Ico m n, f i • g i =
f (n - 1) • G n - f m • G m - ∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), (f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1) := by |
have h₁ : (∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i • G i) = ∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), f (i + 1) • G (i + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.one_le_of_lt hmn), ← sum_Ico_add']
simp only [ge_iff_le, tsub_le_iff_right, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, add_tsub_cancel_right]
have h₂ :
(∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i • G (i + 1)) =
(∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), f i • G (i + 1)) + f (n - 1) • G n - f m • G (m + 1) := by
rw [← sum_Ico_sub_bot _ hmn, ← sum_Ico_succ_sub_top _ (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hmn),
Nat.sub_add_cancel (pos_of_gt hmn), sub_add_cancel]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot hmn]
-- Porting note: the following used to be done with `conv`
have h₃: (Finset.sum (Ico (m + 1) n) fun i => f i • g i) =
(Finset.sum (Ico (m + 1) n) fun i =>
f i • ((Finset.sum (Finset.range (i + 1)) g) -
(Finset.sum (Finset.range i) g))) := by
congr; funext; rw [← sum_range_succ_sub_sum g]
rw [h₃]
simp_rw [smul_sub, sum_sub_distrib, h₂, h₁]
-- Porting note: the following used to be done with `conv`
have h₄ : ((((Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) fun i => f i • Finset.sum (range (i + 1)) fun i => g i) +
f (n - 1) • Finset.sum (range n) fun i => g i) -
f m • Finset.sum (range (m + 1)) fun i => g i) -
Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) fun i => f (i + 1) • Finset.sum (range (i + 1)) fun i => g i) =
f (n - 1) • (range n).sum g - f m • (range (m + 1)).sum g +
Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) (fun i => f i • (range (i + 1)).sum g -
f (i + 1) • (range (i + 1)).sum g) := by
rw [← add_sub, add_comm, ← add_sub, ← sum_sub_distrib]
rw [h₄]
have : ∀ i, f i • G (i + 1) - f (i + 1) • G (i + 1) = -((f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1)) := by
intro i
rw [sub_smul]
abel
simp_rw [this, sum_neg_distrib, sum_range_succ, smul_add]
abel
| 34 | 583,461,742,527,454.9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,449 |
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
namespace Finset
variable {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (f : ℕ → R) (g : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ}
-- The partial sum of `g`, starting from zero
local notation "G " n:80 => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i
theorem sum_Ico_by_parts (hmn : m < n) :
∑ i ∈ Ico m n, f i • g i =
f (n - 1) • G n - f m • G m - ∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), (f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1) := by
have h₁ : (∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i • G i) = ∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), f (i + 1) • G (i + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.one_le_of_lt hmn), ← sum_Ico_add']
simp only [ge_iff_le, tsub_le_iff_right, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, nonpos_iff_eq_zero,
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, add_tsub_cancel_right]
have h₂ :
(∑ i ∈ Ico (m + 1) n, f i • G (i + 1)) =
(∑ i ∈ Ico m (n - 1), f i • G (i + 1)) + f (n - 1) • G n - f m • G (m + 1) := by
rw [← sum_Ico_sub_bot _ hmn, ← sum_Ico_succ_sub_top _ (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hmn),
Nat.sub_add_cancel (pos_of_gt hmn), sub_add_cancel]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot hmn]
-- Porting note: the following used to be done with `conv`
have h₃: (Finset.sum (Ico (m + 1) n) fun i => f i • g i) =
(Finset.sum (Ico (m + 1) n) fun i =>
f i • ((Finset.sum (Finset.range (i + 1)) g) -
(Finset.sum (Finset.range i) g))) := by
congr; funext; rw [← sum_range_succ_sub_sum g]
rw [h₃]
simp_rw [smul_sub, sum_sub_distrib, h₂, h₁]
-- Porting note: the following used to be done with `conv`
have h₄ : ((((Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) fun i => f i • Finset.sum (range (i + 1)) fun i => g i) +
f (n - 1) • Finset.sum (range n) fun i => g i) -
f m • Finset.sum (range (m + 1)) fun i => g i) -
Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) fun i => f (i + 1) • Finset.sum (range (i + 1)) fun i => g i) =
f (n - 1) • (range n).sum g - f m • (range (m + 1)).sum g +
Finset.sum (Ico m (n - 1)) (fun i => f i • (range (i + 1)).sum g -
f (i + 1) • (range (i + 1)).sum g) := by
rw [← add_sub, add_comm, ← add_sub, ← sum_sub_distrib]
rw [h₄]
have : ∀ i, f i • G (i + 1) - f (i + 1) • G (i + 1) = -((f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1)) := by
intro i
rw [sub_smul]
abel
simp_rw [this, sum_neg_distrib, sum_range_succ, smul_add]
abel
#align finset.sum_Ico_by_parts Finset.sum_Ico_by_parts
variable (n)
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Module.lean | 63 | 69 | theorem sum_range_by_parts :
∑ i ∈ range n, f i • g i =
f (n - 1) • G n - ∑ i ∈ range (n - 1), (f (i + 1) - f i) • G (i + 1) := by |
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn]
· rw [range_eq_Ico, sum_Ico_by_parts f g (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn), sum_range_zero, smul_zero,
sub_zero, range_eq_Ico]
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2,449 |
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Ordinal
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.FixedPoint
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.cofinality from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7c2ce0c2da15516b4e65d0c9e254bb6dc93abd1f"
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
variable {α : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop}
namespace Order
def cof (r : α → α → Prop) : Cardinal :=
sInf { c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }
#align order.cof Order.cof
theorem cof_nonempty (r : α → α → Prop) [IsRefl α r] :
{ c | ∃ S : Set α, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) ∧ #S = c }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, Set.univ, fun a => ⟨a, ⟨⟩, refl _⟩, rfl⟩
#align order.cof_nonempty Order.cof_nonempty
theorem cof_le (r : α → α → Prop) {S : Set α} (h : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) : cof r ≤ #S :=
csInf_le' ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
#align order.cof_le Order.cof_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Cofinality.lean | 80 | 85 | theorem le_cof {r : α → α → Prop} [IsRefl α r] (c : Cardinal) :
c ≤ cof r ↔ ∀ {S : Set α}, (∀ a, ∃ b ∈ S, r a b) → c ≤ #S := by |
rw [cof, le_csInf_iff'' (cof_nonempty r)]
use fun H S h => H _ ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
rintro H d ⟨S, h, rfl⟩
exact H h
| 4 | 54.59815 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,450 |
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Trace
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.GaloisField
#align_import field_theory.finite.trace from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0723536a0522d24fc2f159a096fb3304bef77472"
namespace FiniteField
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Finite/Trace.lean | 25 | 32 | theorem trace_to_zmod_nondegenerate (F : Type*) [Field F] [Finite F]
[Algebra (ZMod (ringChar F)) F] {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
∃ b : F, Algebra.trace (ZMod (ringChar F)) F (a * b) ≠ 0 := by |
haveI : Fact (ringChar F).Prime := ⟨CharP.char_is_prime F _⟩
have htr := traceForm_nondegenerate (ZMod (ringChar F)) F a
simp_rw [Algebra.traceForm_apply] at htr
by_contra! hf
exact ha (htr hf)
| 5 | 148.413159 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,451 |
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UrysohnsLemma
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Bounded
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
#align_import topology.metric_space.metrizable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Filter Metric
open scoped Topology BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace TopologicalSpace
section RegularSpace
variable (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [RegularSpace X] [SecondCountableTopology X]
| Mathlib/Topology/Metrizable/Urysohn.lean | 37 | 106 | theorem exists_inducing_l_infty : ∃ f : X → ℕ →ᵇ ℝ, Inducing f := by |
-- Choose a countable basis, and consider the set `s` of pairs of set `(U, V)` such that `U ∈ B`,
-- `V ∈ B`, and `closure U ⊆ V`.
rcases exists_countable_basis X with ⟨B, hBc, -, hB⟩
let s : Set (Set X × Set X) := { UV ∈ B ×ˢ B | closure UV.1 ⊆ UV.2 }
-- `s` is a countable set.
haveI : Encodable s := ((hBc.prod hBc).mono inter_subset_left).toEncodable
-- We don't have the space of bounded (possibly discontinuous) functions, so we equip `s`
-- with the discrete topology and deal with `s →ᵇ ℝ` instead.
letI : TopologicalSpace s := ⊥
haveI : DiscreteTopology s := ⟨rfl⟩
rsuffices ⟨f, hf⟩ : ∃ f : X → s →ᵇ ℝ, Inducing f
· exact ⟨fun x => (f x).extend (Encodable.encode' s) 0,
(BoundedContinuousFunction.isometry_extend (Encodable.encode' s)
(0 : ℕ →ᵇ ℝ)).embedding.toInducing.comp hf⟩
have hd : ∀ UV : s, Disjoint (closure UV.1.1) UV.1.2ᶜ :=
fun UV => disjoint_compl_right.mono_right (compl_subset_compl.2 UV.2.2)
-- Choose a sequence of `εₙ > 0`, `n : s`, that is bounded above by `1` and tends to zero
-- along the `cofinite` filter.
obtain ⟨ε, ε01, hε⟩ : ∃ ε : s → ℝ, (∀ UV, ε UV ∈ Ioc (0 : ℝ) 1) ∧ Tendsto ε cofinite (𝓝 0) := by
rcases posSumOfEncodable zero_lt_one s with ⟨ε, ε0, c, hεc, hc1⟩
refine ⟨ε, fun UV => ⟨ε0 UV, ?_⟩, hεc.summable.tendsto_cofinite_zero⟩
exact (le_hasSum hεc UV fun _ _ => (ε0 _).le).trans hc1
/- For each `UV = (U, V) ∈ s` we use Urysohn's lemma to choose a function `f UV` that is equal to
zero on `U` and is equal to `ε UV` on the complement to `V`. -/
have : ∀ UV : s, ∃ f : C(X, ℝ),
EqOn f 0 UV.1.1 ∧ EqOn f (fun _ => ε UV) UV.1.2ᶜ ∧ ∀ x, f x ∈ Icc 0 (ε UV) := by
intro UV
rcases exists_continuous_zero_one_of_isClosed isClosed_closure
(hB.isOpen UV.2.1.2).isClosed_compl (hd UV) with
⟨f, hf₀, hf₁, hf01⟩
exact ⟨ε UV • f, fun x hx => by simp [hf₀ (subset_closure hx)], fun x hx => by simp [hf₁ hx],
fun x => ⟨mul_nonneg (ε01 _).1.le (hf01 _).1, mul_le_of_le_one_right (ε01 _).1.le (hf01 _).2⟩⟩
choose f hf0 hfε hf0ε using this
have hf01 : ∀ UV x, f UV x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1 :=
fun UV x => Icc_subset_Icc_right (ε01 _).2 (hf0ε _ _)
-- The embedding is given by `F x UV = f UV x`.
set F : X → s →ᵇ ℝ := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun UV => f UV x, continuous_of_discreteTopology⟩, 1,
fun UV₁ UV₂ => Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc_01 (hf01 _ _) (hf01 _ _)⟩
have hF : ∀ x UV, F x UV = f UV x := fun _ _ => rfl
refine ⟨F, inducing_iff_nhds.2 fun x => le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· /- First we prove that `F` is continuous. Given `δ > 0`, consider the set `T` of `(U, V) ∈ s`
such that `ε (U, V) ≥ δ`. Since `ε` tends to zero, `T` is finite. Since each `f` is continuous,
we can choose a neighborhood such that `dist (F y (U, V)) (F x (U, V)) ≤ δ` for any
`(U, V) ∈ T`. For `(U, V) ∉ T`, the same inequality is true because both `F y (U, V)` and
`F x (U, V)` belong to the interval `[0, ε (U, V)]`. -/
refine (nhds_basis_closedBall.comap _).ge_iff.2 fun δ δ0 => ?_
have h_fin : { UV : s | δ ≤ ε UV }.Finite := by simpa only [← not_lt] using hε (gt_mem_nhds δ0)
have : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∀ UV, δ ≤ ε UV → dist (F y UV) (F x UV) ≤ δ := by
refine (eventually_all_finite h_fin).2 fun UV _ => ?_
exact (f UV).continuous.tendsto x (closedBall_mem_nhds _ δ0)
refine this.mono fun y hy => (BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_le δ0.le).2 fun UV => ?_
rcases le_total δ (ε UV) with hle | hle
exacts [hy _ hle, (Real.dist_le_of_mem_Icc (hf0ε _ _) (hf0ε _ _)).trans (by rwa [sub_zero])]
· /- Finally, we prove that each neighborhood `V` of `x : X`
includes a preimage of a neighborhood of `F x` under `F`.
Without loss of generality, `V` belongs to `B`.
Choose `U ∈ B` such that `x ∈ V` and `closure V ⊆ U`.
Then the preimage of the `(ε (U, V))`-neighborhood of `F x` is included by `V`. -/
refine ((nhds_basis_ball.comap _).le_basis_iff hB.nhds_hasBasis).2 ?_
rintro V ⟨hVB, hxV⟩
rcases hB.exists_closure_subset (hB.mem_nhds hVB hxV) with ⟨U, hUB, hxU, hUV⟩
set UV : ↥s := ⟨(U, V), ⟨hUB, hVB⟩, hUV⟩
refine ⟨ε UV, (ε01 UV).1, fun y (hy : dist (F y) (F x) < ε UV) => ?_⟩
replace hy : dist (F y UV) (F x UV) < ε UV :=
(BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_coe_le_dist _).trans_lt hy
contrapose! hy
rw [hF, hF, hfε UV hy, hf0 UV hxU, Pi.zero_apply, dist_zero_right]
exact le_abs_self _
| 69 | 925,378,172,558,778,900,000,000,000,000 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,452 |
import Mathlib.Topology.VectorBundle.Basic
#align_import topology.vector_bundle.hom from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8905e5ed90859939681a725b00f6063e65096d95"
noncomputable section
open scoped Bundle
open Bundle Set ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜₁ : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₁] {𝕜₂ : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂]
(σ : 𝕜₁ →+* 𝕜₂) [iσ : RingHomIsometric σ]
variable {B : Type*}
variable {F₁ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜₁ F₁] (E₁ : B → Type*)
[∀ x, AddCommGroup (E₁ x)] [∀ x, Module 𝕜₁ (E₁ x)] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F₁ E₁)]
variable {F₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F₂] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F₂] (E₂ : B → Type*)
[∀ x, AddCommGroup (E₂ x)] [∀ x, Module 𝕜₂ (E₂ x)] [TopologicalSpace (TotalSpace F₂ E₂)]
protected abbrev Bundle.ContinuousLinearMap [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E₁ x)]
[∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E₂ x)] : B → Type _ := fun x => E₁ x →SL[σ] E₂ x
#align bundle.continuous_linear_map Bundle.ContinuousLinearMap
-- Porting note: possibly remove after the port
instance Bundle.ContinuousLinearMap.module [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E₁ x)]
[∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E₂ x)] [∀ x, TopologicalAddGroup (E₂ x)]
[∀ x, ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜₂ (E₂ x)] : ∀ x, Module 𝕜₂ (Bundle.ContinuousLinearMap σ E₁ E₂ x) :=
fun _ => inferInstance
#align bundle.continuous_linear_map.module Bundle.ContinuousLinearMap.module
variable {E₁ E₂}
variable [TopologicalSpace B] (e₁ e₁' : Trivialization F₁ (π F₁ E₁))
(e₂ e₂' : Trivialization F₂ (π F₂ E₂))
namespace Pretrivialization
def continuousLinearMapCoordChange [e₁.IsLinear 𝕜₁] [e₁'.IsLinear 𝕜₁] [e₂.IsLinear 𝕜₂]
[e₂'.IsLinear 𝕜₂] (b : B) : (F₁ →SL[σ] F₂) →L[𝕜₂] F₁ →SL[σ] F₂ :=
((e₁'.coordChangeL 𝕜₁ e₁ b).symm.arrowCongrSL (e₂.coordChangeL 𝕜₂ e₂' b) :
(F₁ →SL[σ] F₂) ≃L[𝕜₂] F₁ →SL[σ] F₂)
#align pretrivialization.continuous_linear_map_coord_change Pretrivialization.continuousLinearMapCoordChange
variable {σ e₁ e₁' e₂ e₂'}
variable [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E₁ x)] [FiberBundle F₁ E₁]
variable [∀ x, TopologicalSpace (E₂ x)] [ita : ∀ x, TopologicalAddGroup (E₂ x)] [FiberBundle F₂ E₂]
| Mathlib/Topology/VectorBundle/Hom.lean | 92 | 112 | theorem continuousOn_continuousLinearMapCoordChange [VectorBundle 𝕜₁ F₁ E₁] [VectorBundle 𝕜₂ F₂ E₂]
[MemTrivializationAtlas e₁] [MemTrivializationAtlas e₁'] [MemTrivializationAtlas e₂]
[MemTrivializationAtlas e₂'] :
ContinuousOn (continuousLinearMapCoordChange σ e₁ e₁' e₂ e₂')
(e₁.baseSet ∩ e₂.baseSet ∩ (e₁'.baseSet ∩ e₂'.baseSet)) := by |
have h₁ := (compSL F₁ F₂ F₂ σ (RingHom.id 𝕜₂)).continuous
have h₂ := (ContinuousLinearMap.flip (compSL F₁ F₁ F₂ (RingHom.id 𝕜₁) σ)).continuous
have h₃ := continuousOn_coordChange 𝕜₁ e₁' e₁
have h₄ := continuousOn_coordChange 𝕜₂ e₂ e₂'
refine ((h₁.comp_continuousOn (h₄.mono ?_)).clm_comp (h₂.comp_continuousOn (h₃.mono ?_))).congr ?_
· mfld_set_tac
· mfld_set_tac
· intro b _; ext L v
-- Porting note: was
-- simp only [continuousLinearMapCoordChange, ContinuousLinearEquiv.coe_coe,
-- ContinuousLinearEquiv.arrowCongrₛₗ_apply, LinearEquiv.toFun_eq_coe, coe_comp',
-- ContinuousLinearEquiv.arrowCongrSL_apply, comp_apply, Function.comp, compSL_apply,
-- flip_apply, ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_symm]
-- Now `simp` fails to use `ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply` in this case
dsimp [continuousLinearMapCoordChange]
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.symm_symm]
| 16 | 8,886,110.520508 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2,453 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import number_theory.wilson from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c471da714c044131b90c133701e51b877c246677"
open Finset Nat FiniteField ZMod
open scoped Nat
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Wilson.lean | 40 | 69 | theorem wilsons_lemma : ((p - 1)! : ZMod p) = -1 := by |
refine
calc
((p - 1)! : ZMod p) = ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (succ (p - 1)), (x : ZMod p) := by
rw [← Finset.prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial, prod_natCast]
_ = ∏ x : (ZMod p)ˣ, (x : ZMod p) := ?_
_ = -1 := by
-- Porting note: `simp` is less powerful.
-- simp_rw [← Units.coeHom_apply, ← (Units.coeHom (ZMod p)).map_prod,
-- prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one, Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_neg, Units.val_one]
simp_rw [← Units.coeHom_apply]
rw [← map_prod (Units.coeHom (ZMod p))]
simp_rw [prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one, Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_neg, Units.val_one]
have hp : 0 < p := (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).pos
symm
refine prod_bij (fun a _ => (a : ZMod p).val) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro a ha
rw [mem_Ico, ← Nat.succ_sub hp, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
constructor
· apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero; rw [← @val_zero p]
intro h; apply Units.ne_zero a (val_injective p h)
· exact val_lt _
· intro _ _ _ _ h; rw [Units.ext_iff]; exact val_injective p h
· intro b hb
rw [mem_Ico, Nat.succ_le_iff, ← succ_sub hp, Nat.add_one_sub_one, pos_iff_ne_zero] at hb
refine ⟨Units.mk0 b ?_, Finset.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
· intro h; apply hb.1; apply_fun val at h
simpa only [val_cast_of_lt hb.right, val_zero] using h
· simp only [val_cast_of_lt hb.right, Units.val_mk0]
· rintro a -; simp only [cast_id, natCast_val]
| 29 | 3,931,334,297,144.042 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,454 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import number_theory.wilson from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c471da714c044131b90c133701e51b877c246677"
open Finset Nat FiniteField ZMod
open scoped Nat
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
@[simp]
theorem wilsons_lemma : ((p - 1)! : ZMod p) = -1 := by
refine
calc
((p - 1)! : ZMod p) = ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (succ (p - 1)), (x : ZMod p) := by
rw [← Finset.prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial, prod_natCast]
_ = ∏ x : (ZMod p)ˣ, (x : ZMod p) := ?_
_ = -1 := by
-- Porting note: `simp` is less powerful.
-- simp_rw [← Units.coeHom_apply, ← (Units.coeHom (ZMod p)).map_prod,
-- prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one, Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_neg, Units.val_one]
simp_rw [← Units.coeHom_apply]
rw [← map_prod (Units.coeHom (ZMod p))]
simp_rw [prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one, Units.coeHom_apply, Units.val_neg, Units.val_one]
have hp : 0 < p := (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).pos
symm
refine prod_bij (fun a _ => (a : ZMod p).val) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro a ha
rw [mem_Ico, ← Nat.succ_sub hp, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
constructor
· apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero; rw [← @val_zero p]
intro h; apply Units.ne_zero a (val_injective p h)
· exact val_lt _
· intro _ _ _ _ h; rw [Units.ext_iff]; exact val_injective p h
· intro b hb
rw [mem_Ico, Nat.succ_le_iff, ← succ_sub hp, Nat.add_one_sub_one, pos_iff_ne_zero] at hb
refine ⟨Units.mk0 b ?_, Finset.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
· intro h; apply hb.1; apply_fun val at h
simpa only [val_cast_of_lt hb.right, val_zero] using h
· simp only [val_cast_of_lt hb.right, Units.val_mk0]
· rintro a -; simp only [cast_id, natCast_val]
#align zmod.wilsons_lemma ZMod.wilsons_lemma
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Wilson.lean | 73 | 79 | theorem prod_Ico_one_prime : ∏ x ∈ Ico 1 p, (x : ZMod p) = -1 := by |
-- Porting note: was `conv in Ico 1 p =>`
conv =>
congr
congr
rw [← Nat.add_one_sub_one p, succ_sub (Fact.out (p := p.Prime)).pos]
rw [← prod_natCast, Finset.prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial, wilsons_lemma]
| 6 | 403.428793 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,454 |
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import number_theory.wilson from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c471da714c044131b90c133701e51b877c246677"
open Finset Nat FiniteField ZMod
open scoped Nat
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Wilson.lean | 89 | 97 | theorem prime_of_fac_equiv_neg_one (h : ((n - 1)! : ZMod n) = -1) (h1 : n ≠ 1) : Prime n := by |
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | h0)
· norm_num at h
replace h1 : 1 < n := n.two_le_iff.mpr ⟨h0, h1⟩
by_contra h2
obtain ⟨m, hm1, hm2 : 1 < m, hm3⟩ := exists_dvd_of_not_prime2 h1 h2
have hm : m ∣ (n - 1)! := Nat.dvd_factorial (pos_of_gt hm2) (le_pred_of_lt hm3)
refine hm2.ne' (Nat.dvd_one.mp ((Nat.dvd_add_right hm).mp (hm1.trans ?_)))
rw [← ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, cast_add, cast_one, h, add_left_neg]
| 8 | 2,980.957987 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2,454 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.