Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.BoundedContinuousFunction
#align_import measure_theory.measure.portmanteau from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Characterizations of weak convergence of finite measures and probability measures
This file will provide portmanteau characterizations of the weak convergence of finite measures
and of probability measures, i.e., the standard characterizations of convergence in distribution.
## Main definitions
The topologies of weak convergence on the types of finite measures and probability measures are
already defined in their corresponding files; no substantial new definitions are introduced here.
## Main results
The main result will be the portmanteau theorem providing various characterizations of the
weak convergence of measures (probability measures or finite measures). Given measures μs
and μ on a topological space Ω, the conditions that will be proven equivalent (under quite
general hypotheses) are:
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly.
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
The separate implications are:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto` is the implication (T) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge` is the equivalence (C) ↔ (O).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier` is the implication (O) → (B).
* `MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_forall_tendsto_measure` is the implication (B) → (C).
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_of_forall_isOpen_le_liminf` gives the implication (O) → (T) for
any sequence of Borel probability measures.
## Implementation notes
Many of the characterizations of weak convergence hold for finite measures and are proven in that
generality and then specialized to probability measures. Some implications hold with slightly
more general assumptions than in the usual statement of portmanteau theorem. The full portmanteau
theorem, however, is most convenient for probability measures on pseudo-emetrizable spaces with
their Borel sigma algebras.
Some specific considerations on the assumptions in the different implications:
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto` assumes
`PseudoEMetricSpace`. The only reason is to have bounded continuous pointwise approximations
to the indicator function of a closed set. Clearly for example metrizability or
pseudo-emetrizability would be sufficient assumptions. The typeclass assumptions should be later
adjusted in a way that takes into account use cases, but the proof will presumably remain
essentially the same.
* Where formulations are currently only provided for probability measures, one can obtain the
finite measure formulations using the characterization of convergence of finite measures by
their total masses and their probability-normalized versions, i.e., by
`MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.tendsto_normalize_iff_tendsto`.
## References
* [Billingsley, *Convergence of probability measures*][billingsley1999]
## Tags
weak convergence of measures, convergence in distribution, convergence in law, finite measure,
probability measure
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen
/-! ### Portmanteau: limsup condition for closed sets iff liminf condition for open sets
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, the following two conditions are equivalent:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
Either of these will later be shown to be equivalent to the weak convergence of the sequence
of measures.
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- **Portmanteau theorem** -/
theorem le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i => μs i E) ≤ μ E) :
μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [liminf_bot, le_top]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
have obs :
(L.liminf fun i : ι => 1 - μs i E) = L.liminf ((fun x => 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι => μs i E) := rfl
rw [obs]
have := antitone_const_tsub.map_limsup_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i => μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simp_rw [← this]
exact antitone_const_tsub h
#align measure_theory.le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le MeasureTheory.le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le
theorem le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : (L.limsup fun i => μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ) :
μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i E :=
compl_compl E ▸ le_measure_compl_liminf_of_limsup_measure_le (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
#align measure_theory.le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le MeasureTheory.le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le
theorem limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ E ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i E) :
(L.limsup fun i => μs i Eᶜ) ≤ μ Eᶜ := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
have meas_Ec : μ Eᶜ = 1 - μ E := by
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top μ E).ne
have meas_i_Ec : ∀ i, μs i Eᶜ = 1 - μs i E := by
intro i
simpa only [measure_univ] using measure_compl E_mble (measure_lt_top (μs i) E).ne
simp_rw [meas_Ec, meas_i_Ec]
have obs :
(L.limsup fun i : ι => 1 - μs i E) = L.limsup ((fun x => 1 - x) ∘ fun i : ι => μs i E) := rfl
rw [obs]
have := antitone_const_tsub.map_liminf_of_continuousAt (F := L)
(fun i => μs i E) (ENNReal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.one_ne_top).continuousAt
simp_rw [← this]
exact antitone_const_tsub h
#align measure_theory.limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure
theorem limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] {E : Set Ω}
(E_mble : MeasurableSet E) (h : μ Eᶜ ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i Eᶜ) :
(L.limsup fun i => μs i E) ≤ μ E :=
compl_compl E ▸ limsup_measure_compl_le_of_le_liminf_measure (MeasurableSet.compl E_mble) h
#align measure_theory.limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One pair of implications of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, the following two are equivalent:
(C) The limsup of the measures of any closed set is at most the measure of the closed set
under a candidate limit measure.
(O) The liminf of the measures of any open set is at least the measure of the open set
under a candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
[∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)] :
(∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i => μs i F) ≤ μ F) ↔
∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i G := by
constructor
· intro h G G_open
exact le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le
G_open.measurableSet (h Gᶜ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
· intro h F F_closed
exact limsup_measure_le_of_le_liminf_measure_compl
F_closed.measurableSet (h Fᶜ (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr F_closed))
#align measure_theory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge MeasureTheory.limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge
end LimsupClosedLEAndLELiminfOpen -- section
section TendstoOfNullFrontier
/-! ### Portmanteau: limit of measures of Borel sets whose boundary carries no mass in the limit
In this section we prove that for a sequence of Borel probability measures on a topological space
and its candidate limit measure, either of the following equivalent conditions:
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F);
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
implies that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
variable {Ω : Type*} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
theorem tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
{μ : Measure Ω} {μs : ι → Measure Ω} {E₀ E E₁ : Set Ω} (E₀_subset : E₀ ⊆ E) (subset_E₁ : E ⊆ E₁)
(nulldiff : μ (E₁ \ E₀) = 0) (h_E₀ : μ E₀ ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i E₀)
(h_E₁ : (L.limsup fun i => μs i E₁) ≤ μ E₁) : L.Tendsto (fun i => μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
apply tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
· have E₀_ae_eq_E : E₀ =ᵐ[μ] E :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm E₀_subset.eventuallyLE
(subset_E₁.eventuallyLE.trans (ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff))
calc
μ E = μ E₀ := measure_congr E₀_ae_eq_E.symm
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i E₀ := h_E₀
_ ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i E :=
liminf_le_liminf (eventually_of_forall fun _ => measure_mono E₀_subset)
· have E_ae_eq_E₁ : E =ᵐ[μ] E₁ :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm subset_E₁.eventuallyLE
((ae_le_set.mpr nulldiff).trans E₀_subset.eventuallyLE)
calc
(L.limsup fun i => μs i E) ≤ L.limsup fun i => μs i E₁ :=
limsup_le_limsup (eventually_of_forall fun _ => measure_mono subset_E₁)
_ ≤ μ E₁ := h_E₁
_ = μ E := measure_congr E_ae_eq_E₁.symm
· infer_param
· infer_param
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le
variable [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
For a sequence of Borel probability measures, if the liminf of the measures of any open set is at
least the measure of the open set under a candidate limit measure, then for any set whose
boundary carries no probability mass under the candidate limit measure, then its measures under the
sequence converge to its measure under the candidate limit measure.
-/
theorem tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier {ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι} {μ : Measure Ω}
{μs : ι → Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] [∀ i, IsProbabilityMeasure (μs i)]
(h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → μ G ≤ L.liminf fun i => μs i G) {E : Set Ω}
(E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : L.Tendsto (fun i => μs i E) (𝓝 (μ E)) :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i => μs i F) ≤ μ F :=
limsup_measure_closed_le_iff_liminf_measure_open_ge.mpr h_opens
tendsto_measure_of_le_liminf_measure_of_limsup_measure_le interior_subset subset_closure
E_nullbdry (h_opens _ isOpen_interior) (h_closeds _ isClosed_closure)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier
end TendstoOfNullFrontier --section
section ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: weak convergence implies a limsup condition for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(T) The measures μs tend to the measure μ weakly
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (T) implies also both
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G);
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B).
-/
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of finite measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed set is
at most the measure of the closed set under the limit measure.
-/
theorem FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
[OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] {μ : FiniteMeasure Ω}
{μs : ι → FiniteMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i => (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
rcases L.eq_or_neBot with rfl | hne
· simp only [limsup_bot, bot_le]
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
intro ε ε_pos _
let fs := F_closed.apprSeq
have key₁ : Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ ω, (fs n ω : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) F)) :=
HasOuterApproxClosed.tendsto_lintegral_apprSeq F_closed (μ : Measure Ω)
have room₁ : (μ : Measure Ω) F < (μ : Measure Ω) F + ε / 2 := by
apply
ENNReal.lt_add_right (measure_lt_top (μ : Measure Ω) F).ne
(ENNReal.div_pos_iff.mpr ⟨(ENNReal.coe_pos.mpr ε_pos).ne.symm, ENNReal.two_ne_top⟩).ne.symm
rcases eventually_atTop.mp (eventually_lt_of_tendsto_lt room₁ key₁) with ⟨M, hM⟩
have key₂ := FiniteMeasure.tendsto_iff_forall_lintegral_tendsto.mp μs_lim (fs M)
have room₂ :
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a => fs M a) <
(lintegral (μ : Measure Ω) fun a => fs M a) + ε / 2 := by
apply ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_of_lt ?_)
(ENNReal.div_pos_iff.mpr ⟨(ENNReal.coe_pos.mpr ε_pos).ne.symm, ENNReal.two_ne_top⟩).ne.symm
apply BoundedContinuousFunction.lintegral_lt_top_of_nnreal
have ev_near := Eventually.mono (eventually_lt_of_tendsto_lt room₂ key₂) fun n => le_of_lt
have ev_near' := Eventually.mono ev_near
(fun n ↦ le_trans (HasOuterApproxClosed.measure_le_lintegral F_closed (μs n) M))
apply (Filter.limsup_le_limsup ev_near').trans
rw [limsup_const]
apply le_trans (add_le_add (hM M rfl.le).le (le_refl (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞)))
simp only [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves, le_refl]
#align measure_theory.finite_measure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the limsup of the measures of any closed
set is at most the measure of the closed set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [TopologicalSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{F : Set Ω} (F_closed : IsClosed F) :
(L.limsup fun i => (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F := by
apply FiniteMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
((ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_nhds_iff_toFiniteMeasure_tendsto_nhds L).mp μs_lim) F_closed
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that the liminf of the measures of any open set
is at least the measure of the open set under the limit probability measure.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{G : Set Ω} (G_open : IsOpen G) :
(μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i => (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
haveI h_closeds : ∀ F, IsClosed F → (L.limsup fun i ↦ (μs i : Measure Ω) F) ≤ (μ : Measure Ω) F :=
fun _ F_closed => ProbabilityMeasure.limsup_measure_closed_le_of_tendsto μs_lim F_closed
le_measure_liminf_of_limsup_measure_compl_le G_open.measurableSet
(h_closeds _ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr G_open))
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' {Ω ι : Type*}
{L : Filter ι} [MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
[HasOuterApproxClosed Ω] {μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω}
(μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ)) {E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : (μ : Measure Ω) (frontier E) = 0) :
Tendsto (fun i => (μs i : Measure Ω) E) L (𝓝 ((μ : Measure Ω) E)) :=
haveI h_opens : ∀ G, IsOpen G → (μ : Measure Ω) G ≤ L.liminf fun i => (μs i : Measure Ω) G :=
fun _ G_open => ProbabilityMeasure.le_liminf_measure_open_of_tendsto μs_lim G_open
tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier h_opens E_nullbdry
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto'
/-- One implication of the portmanteau theorem:
Weak convergence of probability measures implies that if the boundary of a Borel set
carries no probability mass under the limit measure, then the limit of the measures of the set
equals the measure of the set under the limit probability measure.
A version with coercions to ordinary `ℝ≥0∞`-valued measures is
`MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto'`.
-/
theorem ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto {Ω ι : Type*} {L : Filter ι}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω] [HasOuterApproxClosed Ω]
{μ : ProbabilityMeasure Ω} {μs : ι → ProbabilityMeasure Ω} (μs_lim : Tendsto μs L (𝓝 μ))
{E : Set Ω} (E_nullbdry : μ (frontier E) = 0) : Tendsto (fun i => μs i E) L (𝓝 (μ E)) := by
have E_nullbdry' : (μ : Measure Ω) (frontier E) = 0 := by
rw [← ProbabilityMeasure.ennreal_coeFn_eq_coeFn_toMeasure, E_nullbdry, ENNReal.coe_zero]
have key := ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto' μs_lim E_nullbdry'
exact (ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal (measure_ne_top (↑μ) E)).comp key
#align measure_theory.probability_measure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.tendsto_measure_of_null_frontier_of_tendsto
end ConvergenceImpliesLimsupClosedLE --section
section LimitBorelImpliesLimsupClosedLE
/-! ### Portmanteau implication: limit condition for Borel sets implies limsup for closed sets
In this section we prove, under the assumption that the underlying topological space `Ω` is
pseudo-emetrizable, that
(B) For any Borel set B whose boundary carries no mass under μ, i.e. μ(∂B) = 0,
the measures of B under μs tend to the measure of B under μ, i.e., limᵢ μsᵢ(B) = μ(B)
implies
(C) For any closed set F, the limsup of the measures of F under μs is at most
the measure of F under μ, i.e., limsupᵢ μsᵢ(F) ≤ μ(F).
Combining with a earlier proven implications, we get that (B) implies also
(O) For any open set G, the liminf of the measures of G under μs is at least
the measure of G under μ, i.e., μ(G) ≤ liminfᵢ μsᵢ(G).
-/
open ENNReal
variable {Ω : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace Ω] [MeasurableSpace Ω] [OpensMeasurableSpace Ω]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Portmanteau.lean | 399 | 410 | theorem exists_null_frontier_thickening (μ : Measure Ω) [SigmaFinite μ] (s : Set Ω) {a b : ℝ}
(hab : a < b) : ∃ r ∈ Ioo a b, μ (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) = 0 := by |
have mbles : ∀ r : ℝ, MeasurableSet (frontier (Metric.thickening r s)) :=
fun r => isClosed_frontier.measurableSet
have disjs := Metric.frontier_thickening_disjoint s
have key := Measure.countable_meas_pos_of_disjoint_iUnion (μ := μ) mbles disjs
have aux := measure_diff_null (s := Ioo a b) (Set.Countable.measure_zero key volume)
have len_pos : 0 < ENNReal.ofReal (b - a) := by simp only [hab, ENNReal.ofReal_pos, sub_pos]
rw [← Real.volume_Ioo, ← aux] at len_pos
rcases nonempty_of_measure_ne_zero len_pos.ne.symm with ⟨r, ⟨r_in_Ioo, hr⟩⟩
refine ⟨r, r_in_Ioo, ?_⟩
simpa only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt, le_zero_iff] using hr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
/-!
# Thickenings in pseudo-metric spaces
## Main definitions
* `Metric.thickening δ s`, the open thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric space.
* `Metric.cthickening δ s`, the closed thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric
space.
## Main results
* `Disjoint.exists_thickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint thickenings
* `Disjoint.exists_cthickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint closed thickenings
* `IsCompact.exists_cthickening_subset_open`: if `s` is compact, `t` is open and `s ⊆ t`,
some `cthickening` of `s` is contained in `t`.
* `Metric.hasBasis_nhdsSet_cthickening`: the `cthickening`s of a compact set `K` form a basis
of the neighbourhoods of `K`
* `Metric.closure_eq_iInter_cthickening'`: the closure of a set equals the intersection
of its closed thickenings of positive radii accumulating at zero.
The same holds for open thickenings.
* `IsCompact.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall`: if `s` is compact, `cthickening δ s` is the union
of `closedBall`s of radius `δ` around `x : E`.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace Metric
section Thickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ : ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
def thickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E < ENNReal.ofReal δ }
#align metric.thickening Metric.thickening
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infEdist_lt : x ∈ thickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_thickening_iff_inf_edist_lt Metric.mem_thickening_iff_infEdist_lt
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
(open) `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_thickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.thickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hδ.le).trans ε_lt.le
/-- The (open) thickening equals the preimage of an open interval under `EMetric.infEdist`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ E = (infEdist · E) ⁻¹' Iio (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
#align metric.thickening_eq_preimage_inf_edist Metric.thickening_eq_preimage_infEdist
/-- The (open) thickening is an open set. -/
theorem isOpen_thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsOpen (thickening δ E) :=
Continuous.isOpen_preimage continuous_infEdist _ isOpen_Iio
#align metric.is_open_thickening Metric.isOpen_thickening
/-- The (open) thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem thickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : thickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [thickening, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, not_top_lt]
#align metric.thickening_empty Metric.thickening_empty
theorem thickening_of_nonpos (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (s : Set α) : thickening δ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ => ((ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hδ).trans_le bot_le).not_lt
#align metric.thickening_of_nonpos Metric.thickening_of_nonpos
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a fixed subset `E` is an increasing function of
the thickening radius `δ`. -/
theorem thickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iio_subset_Iio (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
#align metric.thickening_mono Metric.thickening_mono
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` with a fixed thickening radius `δ` is
an increasing function of the subset `E`. -/
theorem thickening_subset_of_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (h : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickening δ E₁ ⊆ thickening δ E₂ := fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (infEdist_anti h) hx
#align metric.thickening_subset_of_subset Metric.thickening_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt {δ : ℝ} (E : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
infEdist_lt_iff
#align metric.mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt Metric.mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt
/-- The frontier of the (open) thickening of a set is contained in an `EMetric.infEdist` level
set. -/
theorem frontier_thickening_subset (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} :
frontier (thickening δ E) ⊆ { x : α | infEdist x E = ENNReal.ofReal δ } :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq continuous_infEdist continuous_const
#align metric.frontier_thickening_subset Metric.frontier_thickening_subset
theorem frontier_thickening_disjoint (A : Set α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun r : ℝ => frontier (thickening r A)) := by
refine (pairwise_disjoint_on _).2 fun r₁ r₂ hr => ?_
rcases le_total r₁ 0 with h₁ | h₁
· simp [thickening_of_nonpos h₁]
refine ((disjoint_singleton.2 fun h => hr.ne ?_).preimage _).mono (frontier_thickening_subset _)
(frontier_thickening_subset _)
apply_fun ENNReal.toReal at h
rwa [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h₁, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (h₁.trans hr.le)] at h
#align metric.frontier_thickening_disjoint Metric.frontier_thickening_disjoint
/-- Any set is contained in the complement of the δ-thickening of the complement of its
δ-thickening. -/
lemma subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
E ⊆ (thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
intro x x_in_E
simp only [thickening, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
apply EMetric.le_infEdist.mpr fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at hy
simpa only [edist_comm] using le_trans hy <| EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem x_in_E
/-- The δ-thickening of the complement of the δ-thickening of a set is contained in the complement
of the set. -/
lemma thickening_compl_thickening_self_subset_compl (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ ⊆ Eᶜ := by
apply compl_subset_compl.mp
simpa only [compl_compl] using subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self δ E
variable {X : Type u} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt {E : Set X} {x : X} (h : E.Nonempty) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ infDist x E < δ :=
lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top h)
/-- A point in a metric space belongs to the (open) `δ`-thickening of a subset `E` if and only if
it is at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
theorem mem_thickening_iff {E : Set X} {x : X} : x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, dist x z < δ := by
have key_iff : ∀ z : X, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ ↔ dist x z < δ := fun z ↦ by
rw [dist_edist, lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _)]
simp_rw [mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt, key_iff]
#align metric.mem_thickening_iff Metric.mem_thickening_iff
@[simp]
theorem thickening_singleton (δ : ℝ) (x : X) : thickening δ ({x} : Set X) = ball x δ := by
ext
simp [mem_thickening_iff]
#align metric.thickening_singleton Metric.thickening_singleton
theorem ball_subset_thickening {x : X} {E : Set X} (hx : x ∈ E) (δ : ℝ) :
ball x δ ⊆ thickening δ E :=
Subset.trans (by simp [Subset.rfl]) (thickening_subset_of_subset δ <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr hx)
#align metric.ball_subset_thickening Metric.ball_subset_thickening
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a metric space equals the
union of balls of radius `δ` centered at points of `E`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_biUnion_ball {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} : thickening δ E = ⋃ x ∈ E, ball x δ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion₂, exists_prop]
exact mem_thickening_iff
#align metric.thickening_eq_bUnion_ball Metric.thickening_eq_biUnion_ball
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} (h : IsBounded E) :
IsBounded (thickening δ E) := by
rcases E.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· simp
· refine (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall x).2 ⟨δ + diam E, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist y x ≤ infDist y E + diam E := dist_le_infDist_add_diam (x := y) h hx
_ ≤ δ + diam E := add_le_add_right ((mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt ⟨x, hx⟩).1 hy).le _
#align metric.bounded.thickening Bornology.IsBounded.thickening
end Thickening
section Cthickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ ε : ℝ} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The closed `δ`-thickening `Metric.cthickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at infimum distance at most `δ` from `E`. -/
def cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ }
#align metric.cthickening Metric.cthickening
@[simp]
theorem mem_cthickening_iff : x ∈ cthickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_cthickening_iff Metric.mem_cthickening_iff
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
closed `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_cthickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.cthickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [cthickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_le]
exact ((ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos).mpr hδ).trans ε_lt
theorem mem_cthickening_of_edist_le (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) (h : y ∈ E)
(h' : edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E :=
(infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h).trans h'
#align metric.mem_cthickening_of_edist_le Metric.mem_cthickening_of_edist_le
theorem mem_cthickening_of_dist_le {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α)
(h : y ∈ E) (h' : dist x y ≤ δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E := by
apply mem_cthickening_of_edist_le x y δ E h
rw [edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal h'
#align metric.mem_cthickening_of_dist_le Metric.mem_cthickening_of_dist_le
theorem cthickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ E = (fun x => infEdist x E) ⁻¹' Iic (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
#align metric.cthickening_eq_preimage_inf_edist Metric.cthickening_eq_preimage_infEdist
/-- The closed thickening is a closed set. -/
theorem isClosed_cthickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsClosed (cthickening δ E) :=
IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Iic
#align metric.is_closed_cthickening Metric.isClosed_cthickening
/-- The closed thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Thickening.lean | 238 | 239 | theorem cthickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : cthickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by |
simp only [cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, top_le_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
#align_import analysis.convex.quasiconvex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Quasiconvex and quasiconcave functions
This file defines quasiconvexity, quasiconcavity and quasilinearity of functions, which are
generalizations of unimodality and monotonicity. Convexity implies quasiconvexity, concavity implies
quasiconcavity, and monotonicity implies quasilinearity.
## Main declarations
* `QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f`: Quasiconvexity of the function `f` on the set `s` with scalars `𝕜`. This
means that, for all `r`, `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ r}` is `𝕜`-convex.
* `QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f`: Quasiconcavity of the function `f` on the set `s` with scalars `𝕜`. This
means that, for all `r`, `{x ∈ s | r ≤ f x}` is `𝕜`-convex.
* `QuasilinearOn 𝕜 s f`: Quasilinearity of the function `f` on the set `s` with scalars `𝕜`. This
means that `f` is both quasiconvex and quasiconcave.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiconvex_function
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {𝕜 E F β : Type*}
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
section AddCommMonoid_E
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section LE_β
variable (𝕜) [LE β] [SMul 𝕜 E] (s : Set E) (f : E → β)
/-- A function is quasiconvex if all its sublevels are convex.
This means that, for all `r`, `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ r}` is `𝕜`-convex. -/
def QuasiconvexOn : Prop :=
∀ r, Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ r })
#align quasiconvex_on QuasiconvexOn
/-- A function is quasiconcave if all its superlevels are convex.
This means that, for all `r`, `{x ∈ s | r ≤ f x}` is `𝕜`-convex. -/
def QuasiconcaveOn : Prop :=
∀ r, Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | r ≤ f x })
#align quasiconcave_on QuasiconcaveOn
/-- A function is quasilinear if it is both quasiconvex and quasiconcave.
This means that, for all `r`,
the sets `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ r}` and `{x ∈ s | r ≤ f x}` are `𝕜`-convex. -/
def QuasilinearOn : Prop :=
QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f ∧ QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f
#align quasilinear_on QuasilinearOn
variable {𝕜 s f}
theorem QuasiconvexOn.dual : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f → QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) :=
id
#align quasiconvex_on.dual QuasiconvexOn.dual
theorem QuasiconcaveOn.dual : QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f → QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) :=
id
#align quasiconcave_on.dual QuasiconcaveOn.dual
theorem QuasilinearOn.dual : QuasilinearOn 𝕜 s f → QuasilinearOn 𝕜 s (toDual ∘ f) :=
And.symm
#align quasilinear_on.dual QuasilinearOn.dual
theorem Convex.quasiconvexOn_of_convex_le (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (h : ∀ r, Convex 𝕜 { x | f x ≤ r }) :
QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f := fun r => hs.inter (h r)
#align convex.quasiconvex_on_of_convex_le Convex.quasiconvexOn_of_convex_le
theorem Convex.quasiconcaveOn_of_convex_ge (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) (h : ∀ r, Convex 𝕜 { x | r ≤ f x }) :
QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f :=
@Convex.quasiconvexOn_of_convex_le 𝕜 E βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ hs h
#align convex.quasiconcave_on_of_convex_ge Convex.quasiconcaveOn_of_convex_ge
theorem QuasiconvexOn.convex [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] (hf : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
fun x hx y hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
let ⟨_, hxz, hyz⟩ := exists_ge_ge (f x) (f y)
(hf _ ⟨hx, hxz⟩ ⟨hy, hyz⟩ ha hb hab).1
#align quasiconvex_on.convex QuasiconvexOn.convex
theorem QuasiconcaveOn.convex [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] (hf : QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
hf.dual.convex
#align quasiconcave_on.convex QuasiconcaveOn.convex
end LE_β
section Semilattice_β
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem QuasiconvexOn.sup [SemilatticeSup β] (hf : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s g) : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s (f ⊔ g) := by
intro r
simp_rw [Pi.sup_def, sup_le_iff, Set.sep_and]
exact (hf r).inter (hg r)
#align quasiconvex_on.sup QuasiconvexOn.sup
theorem QuasiconcaveOn.inf [SemilatticeInf β] (hf : QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f)
(hg : QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s g) : QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s (f ⊓ g) :=
hf.dual.sup hg
#align quasiconcave_on.inf QuasiconcaveOn.inf
end Semilattice_β
section LinearOrder_β
variable [LinearOrder β] [SMul 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} {f g : E → β}
theorem quasiconvexOn_iff_le_max : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄,
y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ≤ max (f x) (f y) :=
⟨fun hf =>
⟨hf.convex, fun _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
(hf _ ⟨hx, le_max_left _ _⟩ ⟨hy, le_max_right _ _⟩ ha hb hab).2⟩,
fun hf _ _ hx _ hy _ _ ha hb hab =>
⟨hf.1 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab, (hf.2 hx.1 hy.1 ha hb hab).trans <| max_le hx.2 hy.2⟩⟩
#align quasiconvex_on_iff_le_max quasiconvexOn_iff_le_max
theorem quasiconcaveOn_iff_min_le : QuasiconcaveOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄,
y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → min (f x) (f y) ≤ f (a • x + b • y) :=
@quasiconvexOn_iff_le_max 𝕜 E βᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align quasiconcave_on_iff_min_le quasiconcaveOn_iff_min_le
theorem quasilinearOn_iff_mem_uIcc : QuasilinearOn 𝕜 s f ↔ Convex 𝕜 s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄,
y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 → f (a • x + b • y) ∈ uIcc (f x) (f y) := by
rw [QuasilinearOn, quasiconvexOn_iff_le_max, quasiconcaveOn_iff_min_le, and_and_and_comm,
and_self_iff]
apply and_congr_right'
simp_rw [← forall_and, ← Icc_min_max, mem_Icc, and_comm]
#align quasilinear_on_iff_mem_uIcc quasilinearOn_iff_mem_uIcc
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Quasiconvex.lean | 146 | 150 | theorem QuasiconvexOn.convex_lt (hf : QuasiconvexOn 𝕜 s f) (r : β) :
Convex 𝕜 ({ x ∈ s | f x < r }) := by |
refine fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab => ?_
have h := hf _ ⟨hx.1, le_max_left _ _⟩ ⟨hy.1, le_max_right _ _⟩ ha hb hab
exact ⟨h.1, h.2.trans_lt <| max_lt hx.2 hy.2⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison, Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Sort
import Mathlib.Order.Category.NonemptyFinLinOrd
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso
#align_import algebraic_topology.simplex_category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8ac6315bcfcbaf2d19a046719c3b553206dac75"
/-! # The simplex category
We construct a skeletal model of the simplex category, with objects `ℕ` and the
morphism `n ⟶ m` being the monotone maps from `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin (m+1)`.
We show that this category is equivalent to `NonemptyFinLinOrd`.
## Remarks
The definitions `SimplexCategory` and `SimplexCategory.Hom` are marked as irreducible.
We provide the following functions to work with these objects:
1. `SimplexCategory.mk` creates an object of `SimplexCategory` out of a natural number.
Use the notation `[n]` in the `Simplicial` locale.
2. `SimplexCategory.len` gives the "length" of an object of `SimplexCategory`, as a natural.
3. `SimplexCategory.Hom.mk` makes a morphism out of a monotone map between `Fin`'s.
4. `SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom` gives the underlying monotone map associated to a
term of `SimplexCategory.Hom`.
-/
universe v
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- The simplex category:
* objects are natural numbers `n : ℕ`
* morphisms from `n` to `m` are monotone functions `Fin (n+1) → Fin (m+1)`
-/
def SimplexCategory :=
ℕ
#align simplex_category SimplexCategory
namespace SimplexCategory
section
-- Porting note: the definition of `SimplexCategory` is made irreducible below
/-- Interpret a natural number as an object of the simplex category. -/
def mk (n : ℕ) : SimplexCategory :=
n
#align simplex_category.mk SimplexCategory.mk
/-- the `n`-dimensional simplex can be denoted `[n]` -/
scoped[Simplicial] notation "[" n "]" => SimplexCategory.mk n
-- TODO: Make `len` irreducible.
/-- The length of an object of `SimplexCategory`. -/
def len (n : SimplexCategory) : ℕ :=
n
#align simplex_category.len SimplexCategory.len
@[ext]
theorem ext (a b : SimplexCategory) : a.len = b.len → a = b :=
id
#align simplex_category.ext SimplexCategory.ext
attribute [irreducible] SimplexCategory
open Simplicial
@[simp]
theorem len_mk (n : ℕ) : [n].len = n :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.len_mk SimplexCategory.len_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_len (n : SimplexCategory) : ([n.len] : SimplexCategory) = n :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.mk_len SimplexCategory.mk_len
/-- A recursor for `SimplexCategory`. Use it as `induction Δ using SimplexCategory.rec`. -/
protected def rec {F : SimplexCategory → Sort*} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, F [n]) : ∀ X, F X := fun n =>
h n.len
#align simplex_category.rec SimplexCategory.rec
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- Morphisms in the `SimplexCategory`. -/
protected def Hom (a b : SimplexCategory) :=
Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)
#align simplex_category.hom SimplexCategory.Hom
namespace Hom
/-- Make a morphism in `SimplexCategory` from a monotone map of `Fin`'s. -/
def mk {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)) : SimplexCategory.Hom a b :=
f
#align simplex_category.hom.mk SimplexCategory.Hom.mk
/-- Recover the monotone map from a morphism in the simplex category. -/
def toOrderHom {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1) :=
f
#align simplex_category.hom.to_order_hom SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom
theorem ext' {a b : SimplexCategory} (f g : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
f.toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom → f = g :=
id
#align simplex_category.hom.ext SimplexCategory.Hom.ext'
attribute [irreducible] SimplexCategory.Hom
@[simp]
theorem mk_toOrderHom {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) : mk f.toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.mk_to_order_hom SimplexCategory.Hom.mk_toOrderHom
@[simp]
theorem toOrderHom_mk {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1)) :
(mk f).toOrderHom = f :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.to_order_hom_mk SimplexCategory.Hom.toOrderHom_mk
theorem mk_toOrderHom_apply {a b : SimplexCategory} (f : Fin (a.len + 1) →o Fin (b.len + 1))
(i : Fin (a.len + 1)) : (mk f).toOrderHom i = f i :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.hom.mk_to_order_hom_apply SimplexCategory.Hom.mk_toOrderHom_apply
/-- Identity morphisms of `SimplexCategory`. -/
@[simp]
def id (a : SimplexCategory) : SimplexCategory.Hom a a :=
mk OrderHom.id
#align simplex_category.hom.id SimplexCategory.Hom.id
/-- Composition of morphisms of `SimplexCategory`. -/
@[simp]
def comp {a b c : SimplexCategory} (f : SimplexCategory.Hom b c) (g : SimplexCategory.Hom a b) :
SimplexCategory.Hom a c :=
mk <| f.toOrderHom.comp g.toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.hom.comp SimplexCategory.Hom.comp
end Hom
instance smallCategory : SmallCategory.{0} SimplexCategory where
Hom n m := SimplexCategory.Hom n m
id m := SimplexCategory.Hom.id _
comp f g := SimplexCategory.Hom.comp g f
#align simplex_category.small_category SimplexCategory.smallCategory
@[simp]
lemma id_toOrderHom (a : SimplexCategory) :
Hom.toOrderHom (𝟙 a) = OrderHom.id := rfl
@[simp]
lemma comp_toOrderHom {a b c: SimplexCategory} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(f ≫ g).toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom.comp f.toOrderHom := rfl
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext'` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
theorem Hom.ext {a b : SimplexCategory} (f g : a ⟶ b) :
f.toOrderHom = g.toOrderHom → f = g :=
Hom.ext' _ _
/-- The constant morphism from [0]. -/
def const (x y : SimplexCategory) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) : x ⟶ y :=
Hom.mk <| ⟨fun _ => i, by tauto⟩
#align simplex_category.const SimplexCategory.const
@[simp]
lemma const_eq_id : const [0] [0] 0 = 𝟙 _ := by aesop
@[simp]
lemma const_apply (x y : SimplexCategory) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) (a : Fin (x.len + 1)) :
(const x y i).toOrderHom a = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_comp (x : SimplexCategory) {y z : SimplexCategory}
(f : y ⟶ z) (i : Fin (y.len + 1)) :
const x y i ≫ f = const x z (f.toOrderHom i) :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.const_comp SimplexCategory.const_comp
/-- Make a morphism `[n] ⟶ [m]` from a monotone map between fin's.
This is useful for constructing morphisms between `[n]` directly
without identifying `n` with `[n].len`.
-/
@[simp]
def mkHom {n m : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) →o Fin (m + 1)) : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [m] :=
SimplexCategory.Hom.mk f
#align simplex_category.mk_hom SimplexCategory.mkHom
theorem hom_zero_zero (f : ([0] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [0]) : f = 𝟙 _ := by
ext : 3
apply @Subsingleton.elim (Fin 1)
#align simplex_category.hom_zero_zero SimplexCategory.hom_zero_zero
end
open Simplicial
section Generators
/-!
## Generating maps for the simplex category
TODO: prove that the simplex category is equivalent to
one given by the following generators and relations.
-/
/-- The `i`-th face map from `[n]` to `[n+1]` -/
def δ {n} (i : Fin (n + 2)) : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n + 1] :=
mkHom (Fin.succAboveOrderEmb i).toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.δ SimplexCategory.δ
/-- The `i`-th degeneracy map from `[n+1]` to `[n]` -/
def σ {n} (i : Fin (n + 1)) : ([n + 1] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n] :=
mkHom
{ toFun := Fin.predAbove i
monotone' := Fin.predAbove_right_monotone i }
#align simplex_category.σ SimplexCategory.σ
/-- The generic case of the first simplicial identity -/
theorem δ_comp_δ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ j) :
δ i ≫ δ j.succ = δ j ≫ δ (Fin.castSucc i) := by
ext k
dsimp [δ, Fin.succAbove]
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩
rcases j with ⟨j, _⟩
rcases k with ⟨k, _⟩
split_ifs <;> · simp at * <;> omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ
theorem δ_comp_δ' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : Fin.castSucc i < j) :
δ i ≫ δ j =
δ (j.pred fun (hj : j = 0) => by simp [hj, Fin.not_lt_zero] at H) ≫
δ (Fin.castSucc i) := by
rw [← δ_comp_δ]
· rw [Fin.succ_pred]
· simpa only [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, ← Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← Fin.val_succ,
j.succ_pred, Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val] using H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ'
theorem δ_comp_δ'' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
δ (i.castLT (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.le_iff_val_le_val.mp H) j.is_lt)) ≫ δ j.succ =
δ j ≫ δ i := by
rw [δ_comp_δ]
· rfl
· exact H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ'' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ''
/-- The special case of the first simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} : δ i ≫ δ (Fin.castSucc i) = δ i ≫ δ i.succ :=
(δ_comp_δ (le_refl i)).symm
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ_self SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_δ_self' {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 3)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
δ i ≫ δ j = δ i ≫ δ i.succ := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_δ_self]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_δ_self' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_δ_self'
/-- The second simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_le {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ Fin.castSucc j) :
δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ j.succ = σ j ≫ δ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [σ, δ]
rcases le_or_lt i k with (hik | hik)
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hik),
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc]
rcases le_or_lt k (j.castSucc) with (hjk | hjk)
· rwa [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk, Fin.castSucc_castPred]
· rw [Fin.le_castSucc_iff, Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.succ_pred]
exact H.trans_lt hjk
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hik)]
have hjk := H.trans_lt' hik
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr
(hjk.trans (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ _)).le),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk.le, Fin.castPred_castSucc, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt,
Fin.castSucc_castPred]
rwa [Fin.castSucc_castPred]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_le SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_le
/-- The first part of the third simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
δ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
rcases i with ⟨i, hi⟩
ext ⟨j, hj⟩
simp? at hj says simp only [len_mk] at hj
dsimp [σ, δ, Fin.predAbove, Fin.succAbove]
simp only [Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val, Fin.dite_val, Fin.ite_val, Fin.coe_pred, ge_iff_le,
Fin.coe_castLT, dite_eq_ite]
split_ifs
any_goals simp
all_goals omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_self SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_self' {n} {j : Fin (n + 2)} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (H : j = Fin.castSucc i) :
δ j ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_self]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_self' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_self'
/-- The second part of the third simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ {n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} : δ i.succ ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
ext j
rcases i with ⟨i, _⟩
rcases j with ⟨j, _⟩
dsimp [δ, σ, Fin.succAbove, Fin.predAbove]
split_ifs <;> simp <;> simp at * <;> omega
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_succ SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_succ' {n} (j : Fin (n + 2)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (H : j = i.succ) :
δ j ≫ σ i = 𝟙 ([n] : SimplexCategory) := by
subst H
rw [δ_comp_σ_succ]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_succ' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_succ'
/-- The fourth simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt {n} {i : Fin (n + 2)} {j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : Fin.castSucc j < i) :
δ i.succ ≫ σ (Fin.castSucc j) = σ j ≫ δ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [δ, σ]
rcases le_or_lt k i with (hik | hik)
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr hik)]
rcases le_or_lt k (j.castSucc) with (hjk | hjk)
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _
(Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hjk), Fin.castPred_castSucc,
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ hjk, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, Fin.castSucc_castPred]
rw [Fin.castSucc_castPred]
exact hjk.trans_lt H
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hjk),
Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt,
Fin.castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
rwa [Fin.castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, Fin.succ_pred]
· rw [Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hik)]
have hjk := H.trans hik
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ hjk, Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _
(Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr hjk.le),
Fin.pred_succ, Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc, Fin.succ_pred]
rwa [Fin.le_castSucc_pred_iff]
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_gt SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt
@[reassoc]
theorem δ_comp_σ_of_gt' {n} {i : Fin (n + 3)} {j : Fin (n + 2)} (H : j.succ < i) :
δ i ≫ σ j = σ (j.castLT ((add_lt_add_iff_right 1).mp (lt_of_lt_of_le H i.is_le))) ≫
δ (i.pred fun (hi : i = 0) => by simp only [Fin.not_lt_zero, hi] at H) := by
rw [← δ_comp_σ_of_gt]
· simp
· rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT, ← Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff, Fin.succ_pred]
exact H
#align simplex_category.δ_comp_σ_of_gt' SimplexCategory.δ_comp_σ_of_gt'
/-- The fifth simplicial identity -/
@[reassoc]
theorem σ_comp_σ {n} {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (H : i ≤ j) :
σ (Fin.castSucc i) ≫ σ j = σ j.succ ≫ σ i := by
ext k : 3
dsimp [σ]
cases' k using Fin.lastCases with k
· simp only [len_mk, Fin.predAbove_right_last]
· cases' k using Fin.cases with k
· rw [Fin.castSucc_zero, Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ 0 (Fin.zero_le _),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.zero_le _), Fin.castPred_zero,
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ 0 (Fin.zero_le _),
Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.zero_le _)]
· rcases le_or_lt i k with (h | h)
· simp_rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt i.castSucc _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr
(Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)), ← Fin.succ_castSucc, Fin.pred_succ,
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ]
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt i _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_succ_iff.mpr _), Fin.pred_succ]
rcases le_or_lt k j with (hkj | hkj)
· rwa [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr hkj),
Fin.castPred_castSucc]
· rw [Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.mpr hkj),
Fin.le_pred_iff,
Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff]
exact H.trans_lt hkj
· simp_rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc i.castSucc _ (Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr
(Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)), Fin.castPred_castSucc, ← Fin.succ_castSucc,
Fin.succ_predAbove_succ]
rw [Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ k.castSucc
(Fin.castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (h.le.trans H)),
Fin.castPred_castSucc, Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ k.succ
(Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (H.trans_lt' h)), Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ k.succ
(Fin.succ_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)]
#align simplex_category.σ_comp_σ SimplexCategory.σ_comp_σ
/--
If `f : [m] ⟶ [n+1]` is a morphism and `j` is not in the range of `f`,
then `factor_δ f j` is a morphism `[m] ⟶ [n]` such that
`factor_δ f j ≫ δ j = f` (as witnessed by `factor_δ_spec`).
-/
def factor_δ {m n : ℕ} (f : ([m] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n+1]) (j : Fin (n+2)) :
([m] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n] :=
f ≫ σ (Fin.predAbove 0 j)
open Fin in
lemma factor_δ_spec {m n : ℕ} (f : ([m] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n+1]) (j : Fin (n+2))
(hj : ∀ (k : Fin (m+1)), f.toOrderHom k ≠ j) :
factor_δ f j ≫ δ j = f := by
ext k : 3
specialize hj k
dsimp [factor_δ, δ, σ]
cases' j using cases with j
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero, predAbove_of_castSucc_lt 0 _
(castSucc_zero ▸ pos_of_ne_zero hj),
zero_succAbove, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt 0 _ (castSucc_zero ▸ succ_pos _), pred_succ]
rcases hj.lt_or_lt with (hj | hj)
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc j _]
swap
· exact (le_castSucc_iff.mpr hj)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
swap
· rwa [castSucc_lt_succ_iff, castPred_le_iff, le_castSucc_iff]
rw [castSucc_castPred]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
swap
· exact (castSucc_lt_succ _).trans hj
rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc]
swap
· rwa [succ_le_castSucc_iff, lt_pred_iff]
rw [succ_pred]
end Generators
section Skeleton
/-- The functor that exhibits `SimplexCategory` as skeleton
of `NonemptyFinLinOrd` -/
@[simps obj map]
def skeletalFunctor : SimplexCategory ⥤ NonemptyFinLinOrd where
obj a := NonemptyFinLinOrd.of (Fin (a.len + 1))
map f := f.toOrderHom
#align simplex_category.skeletal_functor SimplexCategory.skeletalFunctor
theorem skeletalFunctor.coe_map {Δ₁ Δ₂ : SimplexCategory} (f : Δ₁ ⟶ Δ₂) :
↑(skeletalFunctor.map f) = f.toOrderHom :=
rfl
#align simplex_category.skeletal_functor.coe_map SimplexCategory.skeletalFunctor.coe_map
theorem skeletal : Skeletal SimplexCategory := fun X Y ⟨I⟩ => by
suffices Fintype.card (Fin (X.len + 1)) = Fintype.card (Fin (Y.len + 1)) by
ext
simpa
apply Fintype.card_congr
exact ((skeletalFunctor ⋙ forget NonemptyFinLinOrd).mapIso I).toEquiv
#align simplex_category.skeletal SimplexCategory.skeletal
namespace SkeletalFunctor
instance : skeletalFunctor.Full where
map_surjective f := ⟨SimplexCategory.Hom.mk f, rfl⟩
instance : skeletalFunctor.Faithful where
map_injective {_ _ f g} h := by
ext1
exact h
instance : skeletalFunctor.EssSurj where
mem_essImage X :=
⟨mk (Fintype.card X - 1 : ℕ),
⟨by
have aux : Fintype.card X = Fintype.card X - 1 + 1 :=
(Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos <| Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨⊥⟩).symm
let f := monoEquivOfFin X aux
have hf := (Finset.univ.orderEmbOfFin aux).strictMono
refine
{ hom := ⟨f, hf.monotone⟩
inv := ⟨f.symm, ?_⟩
hom_inv_id := by ext1; apply f.symm_apply_apply
inv_hom_id := by ext1; apply f.apply_symm_apply }
intro i j h
show f.symm i ≤ f.symm j
rw [← hf.le_iff_le]
show f (f.symm i) ≤ f (f.symm j)
simpa only [OrderIso.apply_symm_apply]⟩⟩
noncomputable instance isEquivalence : skeletalFunctor.IsEquivalence where
#align simplex_category.skeletal_functor.is_equivalence SimplexCategory.SkeletalFunctor.isEquivalence
end SkeletalFunctor
/-- The equivalence that exhibits `SimplexCategory` as skeleton
of `NonemptyFinLinOrd` -/
noncomputable def skeletalEquivalence : SimplexCategory ≌ NonemptyFinLinOrd :=
Functor.asEquivalence skeletalFunctor
#align simplex_category.skeletal_equivalence SimplexCategory.skeletalEquivalence
end Skeleton
/-- `SimplexCategory` is a skeleton of `NonemptyFinLinOrd`.
-/
lemma isSkeletonOf :
IsSkeletonOf NonemptyFinLinOrd SimplexCategory skeletalFunctor where
skel := skeletal
eqv := SkeletalFunctor.isEquivalence
#align simplex_category.is_skeleton_of SimplexCategory.isSkeletonOf
/-- The truncated simplex category. -/
def Truncated (n : ℕ) :=
FullSubcategory fun a : SimplexCategory => a.len ≤ n
#align simplex_category.truncated SimplexCategory.Truncated
instance (n : ℕ) : SmallCategory.{0} (Truncated n) :=
FullSubcategory.category _
namespace Truncated
instance {n} : Inhabited (Truncated n) :=
⟨⟨[0], by simp⟩⟩
/-- The fully faithful inclusion of the truncated simplex category into the usual
simplex category.
-/
def inclusion {n : ℕ} : SimplexCategory.Truncated n ⥤ SimplexCategory :=
fullSubcategoryInclusion _
#align simplex_category.truncated.inclusion SimplexCategory.Truncated.inclusion
instance (n : ℕ) : (inclusion : Truncated n ⥤ _).Full := FullSubcategory.full _
instance (n : ℕ) : (inclusion : Truncated n ⥤ _).Faithful := FullSubcategory.faithful _
end Truncated
section Concrete
instance : ConcreteCategory.{0} SimplexCategory where
forget :=
{ obj := fun i => Fin (i.len + 1)
map := fun f => f.toOrderHom }
forget_faithful := ⟨fun h => by ext : 2; exact h⟩
end Concrete
section EpiMono
/-- A morphism in `SimplexCategory` is a monomorphism precisely when it is an injective function
-/
theorem mono_iff_injective {n m : SimplexCategory} {f : n ⟶ m} :
Mono f ↔ Function.Injective f.toOrderHom := by
rw [← Functor.mono_map_iff_mono skeletalEquivalence.functor]
dsimp only [skeletalEquivalence, Functor.asEquivalence_functor]
simp only [skeletalFunctor_obj, skeletalFunctor_map,
NonemptyFinLinOrd.mono_iff_injective, NonemptyFinLinOrd.coe_of]
#align simplex_category.mono_iff_injective SimplexCategory.mono_iff_injective
/-- A morphism in `SimplexCategory` is an epimorphism if and only if it is a surjective function
-/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SimplexCategory.lean | 563 | 568 | theorem epi_iff_surjective {n m : SimplexCategory} {f : n ⟶ m} :
Epi f ↔ Function.Surjective f.toOrderHom := by |
rw [← Functor.epi_map_iff_epi skeletalEquivalence.functor]
dsimp only [skeletalEquivalence, Functor.asEquivalence_functor]
simp only [skeletalFunctor_obj, skeletalFunctor_map,
NonemptyFinLinOrd.epi_iff_surjective, NonemptyFinLinOrd.coe_of]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
#align_import topology.omega_complete_partial_order from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2705404e701abc6b3127da906f40bae062a169c9"
/-!
# Scott Topological Spaces
A type of topological spaces whose notion
of continuity is equivalent to continuity in ωCPOs.
## Reference
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Scott+topology
-/
open Set OmegaCompletePartialOrder
open scoped Classical
universe u
-- "Scott", "ωSup"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
namespace Scott
/-- `x` is an `ω`-Sup of a chain `c` if it is the least upper bound of the range of `c`. -/
def IsωSup {α : Type u} [Preorder α] (c : Chain α) (x : α) : Prop :=
(∀ i, c i ≤ x) ∧ ∀ y, (∀ i, c i ≤ y) → x ≤ y
#align Scott.is_ωSup Scott.IsωSup
theorem isωSup_iff_isLUB {α : Type u} [Preorder α] {c : Chain α} {x : α} :
IsωSup c x ↔ IsLUB (range c) x := by
simp [IsωSup, IsLUB, IsLeast, upperBounds, lowerBounds]
#align Scott.is_ωSup_iff_is_lub Scott.isωSup_iff_isLUB
variable (α : Type u) [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α]
/-- The characteristic function of open sets is monotone and preserves
the limits of chains. -/
def IsOpen (s : Set α) : Prop :=
Continuous' fun x ↦ x ∈ s
#align Scott.is_open Scott.IsOpen
theorem isOpen_univ : IsOpen α univ :=
⟨fun _ _ _ _ ↦ mem_univ _, @CompleteLattice.top_continuous α Prop _ _⟩
#align Scott.is_open_univ Scott.isOpen_univ
theorem IsOpen.inter (s t : Set α) : IsOpen α s → IsOpen α t → IsOpen α (s ∩ t) :=
CompleteLattice.inf_continuous'
#align Scott.is_open.inter Scott.IsOpen.inter
theorem isOpen_sUnion (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen α t) : IsOpen α (⋃₀ s) := by
simp only [IsOpen] at hs ⊢
convert CompleteLattice.sSup_continuous' (setOf ⁻¹' s) hs
simp only [sSup_apply, setOf_bijective.surjective.exists, exists_prop, mem_preimage,
SetCoe.exists, iSup_Prop_eq, mem_setOf_eq, mem_sUnion]
#align Scott.is_open_sUnion Scott.isOpen_sUnion
theorem IsOpen.isUpperSet {s : Set α} (hs : IsOpen α s) : IsUpperSet s := hs.fst
end Scott
/-- A Scott topological space is defined on preorders
such that their open sets, seen as a function `α → Prop`,
preserves the joins of ω-chains -/
abbrev Scott (α : Type u) := α
#align Scott Scott
instance Scott.topologicalSpace (α : Type u) [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] :
TopologicalSpace (Scott α) where
IsOpen := Scott.IsOpen α
isOpen_univ := Scott.isOpen_univ α
isOpen_inter := Scott.IsOpen.inter α
isOpen_sUnion := Scott.isOpen_sUnion α
#align Scott.topological_space Scott.topologicalSpace
section notBelow
variable {α : Type*} [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] (y : Scott α)
/-- `notBelow` is an open set in `Scott α` used
to prove the monotonicity of continuous functions -/
def notBelow :=
{ x | ¬x ≤ y }
#align not_below notBelow
theorem notBelow_isOpen : IsOpen (notBelow y) := by
have h : Monotone (notBelow y) := fun x z hle ↦ mt hle.trans
refine ⟨h, fun c ↦ eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [ωSup_le_iff, notBelow, mem_setOf_eq, le_Prop_eq, OrderHom.coe_mk, Chain.map_coe,
Function.comp_apply, exists_imp, not_forall]
#align not_below_is_open notBelow_isOpen
end notBelow
open Scott hiding IsOpen
open OmegaCompletePartialOrder
| Mathlib/Topology/OmegaCompletePartialOrder.lean | 110 | 113 | theorem isωSup_ωSup {α} [OmegaCompletePartialOrder α] (c : Chain α) : IsωSup c (ωSup c) := by |
constructor
· apply le_ωSup
· apply ωSup_le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Johan Commelin, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align_import category_theory.adjunction.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d101e93197bb5f6ea89bd7ba386b7f7dff1f3903"
/-!
# Adjunctions between functors
`F ⊣ G` represents the data of an adjunction between two functors
`F : C ⥤ D` and `G : D ⥤ C`. `F` is the left adjoint and `G` is the right adjoint.
We provide various useful constructors:
* `mkOfHomEquiv`
* `mkOfUnitCounit`
* `leftAdjointOfEquiv` / `rightAdjointOfEquiv`
construct a left/right adjoint of a given functor given the action on objects and
the relevant equivalence of morphism spaces.
* `adjunctionOfEquivLeft` / `adjunctionOfEquivRight` witness that these constructions
give adjunctions.
There are also typeclasses `IsLeftAdjoint` / `IsRightAdjoint`, which asserts the
existence of a adjoint functor. Given `[F.IsLeftAdjoint]`, a chosen right
adjoint can be obtained as `F.rightAdjoint`.
`Adjunction.comp` composes adjunctions.
`toEquivalence` upgrades an adjunction to an equivalence,
given witnesses that the unit and counit are pointwise isomorphisms.
Conversely `Equivalence.toAdjunction` recovers the underlying adjunction from an equivalence.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
-- Porting Note: `elab_without_expected_type` cannot be a local attribute
-- attribute [local elab_without_expected_type] whiskerLeft whiskerRight
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- `F ⊣ G` represents the data of an adjunction between two functors
`F : C ⥤ D` and `G : D ⥤ C`. `F` is the left adjoint and `G` is the right adjoint.
To construct an `adjunction` between two functors, it's often easier to instead use the
constructors `mkOfHomEquiv` or `mkOfUnitCounit`. To construct a left adjoint,
there are also constructors `leftAdjointOfEquiv` and `adjunctionOfEquivLeft` (as
well as their duals) which can be simpler in practice.
Uniqueness of adjoints is shown in `CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Opposites`.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0037>.
-/
structure Adjunction (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ C) where
/-- The equivalence between `Hom (F X) Y` and `Hom X (G Y)` coming from an adjunction -/
homEquiv : ∀ X Y, (F.obj X ⟶ Y) ≃ (X ⟶ G.obj Y)
/-- The unit of an adjunction -/
unit : 𝟭 C ⟶ F.comp G
/-- The counit of an adjunction -/
counit : G.comp F ⟶ 𝟭 D
-- Porting note: It's strange that this `Prop` is being flagged by the `docBlame` linter
/-- Naturality of the unit of an adjunction -/
homEquiv_unit : ∀ {X Y f}, (homEquiv X Y) f = (unit : _ ⟶ _).app X ≫ G.map f := by aesop_cat
-- Porting note: It's strange that this `Prop` is being flagged by the `docBlame` linter
/-- Naturality of the counit of an adjunction -/
homEquiv_counit : ∀ {X Y g}, (homEquiv X Y).symm g = F.map g ≫ counit.app Y := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.adjunction CategoryTheory.Adjunction
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_unit CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_unit
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_unit' CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_unit
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_counit CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_counit
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_counit' CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_counit
/-- The notation `F ⊣ G` stands for `Adjunction F G` representing that `F` is left adjoint to `G` -/
infixl:15 " ⊣ " => Adjunction
namespace Functor
/-- A class asserting the existence of a right adjoint. -/
class IsLeftAdjoint (left : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
exists_rightAdjoint : ∃ (right : D ⥤ C), Nonempty (left ⊣ right)
#align category_theory.is_left_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.IsLeftAdjoint
/-- A class asserting the existence of a left adjoint. -/
class IsRightAdjoint (right : D ⥤ C) : Prop where
exists_leftAdjoint : ∃ (left : C ⥤ D), Nonempty (left ⊣ right)
#align category_theory.is_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.IsRightAdjoint
/-- A chosen left adjoint to a functor that is a right adjoint. -/
noncomputable def leftAdjoint (R : D ⥤ C) [IsRightAdjoint R] : C ⥤ D :=
(IsRightAdjoint.exists_leftAdjoint (right := R)).choose
#align category_theory.left_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.leftAdjoint
/-- A chosen right adjoint to a functor that is a left adjoint. -/
noncomputable def rightAdjoint (L : C ⥤ D) [IsLeftAdjoint L] : D ⥤ C :=
(IsLeftAdjoint.exists_rightAdjoint (left := L)).choose
#align category_theory.right_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.rightAdjoint
end Functor
/-- The adjunction associated to a functor known to be a left adjoint. -/
noncomputable def Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint (left : C ⥤ D) [left.IsLeftAdjoint] :
left ⊣ left.rightAdjoint :=
Functor.IsLeftAdjoint.exists_rightAdjoint.choose_spec.some
#align category_theory.adjunction.of_left_adjoint CategoryTheory.Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint
/-- The adjunction associated to a functor known to be a right adjoint. -/
noncomputable def Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint (right : C ⥤ D) [right.IsRightAdjoint] :
right.leftAdjoint ⊣ right :=
Functor.IsRightAdjoint.exists_leftAdjoint.choose_spec.some
#align category_theory.adjunction.of_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint
namespace Adjunction
-- Porting note: Workaround not needed in Lean 4
-- restate_axiom homEquiv_unit'
-- restate_axiom homEquiv_counit'
attribute [simp] homEquiv_unit homEquiv_counit
section
variable {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G)
lemma isLeftAdjoint : F.IsLeftAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
lemma isRightAdjoint : G.IsRightAdjoint := ⟨_, ⟨adj⟩⟩
instance (R : D ⥤ C) [R.IsRightAdjoint] : R.leftAdjoint.IsLeftAdjoint :=
(ofIsRightAdjoint R).isLeftAdjoint
instance (L : C ⥤ D) [L.IsLeftAdjoint] : L.rightAdjoint.IsRightAdjoint :=
(ofIsLeftAdjoint L).isRightAdjoint
variable {X' X : C} {Y Y' : D}
theorem homEquiv_id (X : C) : adj.homEquiv X _ (𝟙 _) = adj.unit.app X := by simp
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_id CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_id
theorem homEquiv_symm_id (X : D) : (adj.homEquiv _ X).symm (𝟙 _) = adj.counit.app X := by simp
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_symm_id CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_symm_id
/-
Porting note: `nolint simpNF` as the linter was complaining that this was provable using `simp`
but it is in fact not. Also the `docBlame` linter expects a docstring even though this is `Prop`
valued
-/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left_symm (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y) :
(adj.homEquiv X' Y).symm (f ≫ g) = F.map f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y).symm g := by
rw [homEquiv_counit, F.map_comp, assoc, adj.homEquiv_counit.symm]
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_naturality_left_symm CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_left_symm
-- Porting note: Same as above
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : F.obj X ⟶ Y) :
(adj.homEquiv X' Y) (F.map f ≫ g) = f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y) g := by
rw [← Equiv.eq_symm_apply]
simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply,eq_self_iff_true,homEquiv_naturality_left_symm]
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_left
-- Porting note: Same as above
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right (f : F.obj X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
(adj.homEquiv X Y') (f ≫ g) = (adj.homEquiv X Y) f ≫ G.map g := by
rw [homEquiv_unit, G.map_comp, ← assoc, ← homEquiv_unit]
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_right
-- Porting note: Same as above
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right_symm (f : X ⟶ G.obj Y) (g : Y ⟶ Y') :
(adj.homEquiv X Y').symm (f ≫ G.map g) = (adj.homEquiv X Y).symm f ≫ g := by
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq]
simp only [homEquiv_naturality_right,eq_self_iff_true,Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align category_theory.adjunction.hom_equiv_naturality_right_symm CategoryTheory.Adjunction.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left_square (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : F.obj X ⟶ Y')
(h : F.obj X' ⟶ Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') (w : F.map f ≫ g = h ≫ k) :
f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y') g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y) h ≫ G.map k := by
rw [← homEquiv_naturality_left, ← homEquiv_naturality_right, w]
@[reassoc]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right_square (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y')
(h : X' ⟶ G.obj Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') (w : f ≫ g = h ≫ G.map k) :
F.map f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y').symm g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y).symm h ≫ k := by
rw [← homEquiv_naturality_left_symm, ← homEquiv_naturality_right_symm, w]
theorem homEquiv_naturality_left_square_iff (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : F.obj X ⟶ Y')
(h : F.obj X' ⟶ Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') :
(f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y') g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y) h ≫ G.map k) ↔
(F.map f ≫ g = h ≫ k) :=
⟨fun w ↦ by simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
using homEquiv_naturality_right_square adj _ _ _ _ w,
homEquiv_naturality_left_square adj f g h k⟩
theorem homEquiv_naturality_right_square_iff (f : X' ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ G.obj Y')
(h : X' ⟶ G.obj Y) (k : Y ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ≫ (adj.homEquiv X Y').symm g = (adj.homEquiv X' Y).symm h ≫ k) ↔
(f ≫ g = h ≫ G.map k) :=
⟨fun w ↦ by simpa only [Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
using homEquiv_naturality_left_square adj _ _ _ _ w,
homEquiv_naturality_right_square adj f g h k⟩
@[simp]
theorem left_triangle : whiskerRight adj.unit F ≫ whiskerLeft F adj.counit = 𝟙 _ := by
ext; dsimp
erw [← adj.homEquiv_counit, Equiv.symm_apply_eq, adj.homEquiv_unit]
simp
#align category_theory.adjunction.left_triangle CategoryTheory.Adjunction.left_triangle
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Basic.lean | 221 | 224 | theorem right_triangle : whiskerLeft G adj.unit ≫ whiskerRight adj.counit G = 𝟙 _ := by |
ext; dsimp
erw [← adj.homEquiv_unit, ← Equiv.eq_symm_apply, adj.homEquiv_counit]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Connectivity
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.adj_matrix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
/-!
# Adjacency Matrices
This module defines the adjacency matrix of a graph, and provides theorems connecting graph
properties to computational properties of the matrix.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix`: `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`.
* `Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.to_graph`: for `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : A.IsAdjMatrix`,
`h.to_graph` is the simple graph induced by `A`.
* `Matrix.compl`: for `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be
the adjacency matrix of the complement graph of the graph induced by `A`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix`: the adjacency matrix of a `SimpleGraph`.
* `SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_pow_apply_eq_card_walk`: each entry of the `n`th power of
a graph's adjacency matrix counts the number of length-`n` walks between the corresponding
pair of vertices.
-/
open Matrix
open Finset Matrix SimpleGraph
variable {V α β : Type*}
namespace Matrix
/-- `A : Matrix V V α` is qualified as an "adjacency matrix" if
(1) every entry of `A` is `0` or `1`,
(2) `A` is symmetric,
(3) every diagonal entry of `A` is `0`. -/
structure IsAdjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] (A : Matrix V V α) : Prop where
zero_or_one : ∀ i j, A i j = 0 ∨ A i j = 1 := by aesop
symm : A.IsSymm := by aesop
apply_diag : ∀ i, A i i = 0 := by aesop
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix Matrix.IsAdjMatrix
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A : Matrix V V α}
@[simp]
theorem apply_diag_ne [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i : V) :
¬A i i = 1 := by simp [h.apply_diag i]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_diag_ne Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_diag_ne
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_one_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 1 ↔ A i j = 0 := by obtain h | h := h.zero_or_one i j <;> simp [h]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_ne_one_iff Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_ne_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem apply_ne_zero_iff [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) (i j : V) :
¬A i j = 0 ↔ A i j = 1 := by rw [← apply_ne_one_iff h, Classical.not_not]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.apply_ne_zero_iff Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.apply_ne_zero_iff
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α` and `h : IsAdjMatrix A`,
`h.toGraph` is the simple graph whose adjacency matrix is `A`. -/
@[simps]
def toGraph [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj i j := A i j = 1
symm i j hij := by simp only; rwa [h.symm.apply i j]
loopless i := by simp [h]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.to_graph Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.toGraph
instance [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
DecidableRel h.toGraph.Adj := by
simp only [toGraph]
infer_instance
end IsAdjMatrix
/-- For `A : Matrix V V α`, `A.compl` is supposed to be the adjacency matrix of
the complement graph of the graph induced by `A.adjMatrix`. -/
def compl [Zero α] [One α] [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α) : Matrix V V α :=
fun i j => ite (i = j) 0 (ite (A i j = 0) 1 0)
#align matrix.compl Matrix.compl
section Compl
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq V] (A : Matrix V V α)
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply_diag [Zero α] [One α] (i : V) : A.compl i i = 0 := by simp [compl]
#align matrix.compl_apply_diag Matrix.compl_apply_diag
@[simp]
theorem compl_apply [Zero α] [One α] (i j : V) : A.compl i j = 0 ∨ A.compl i j = 1 := by
unfold compl
split_ifs <;> simp
#align matrix.compl_apply Matrix.compl_apply
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : A.compl.IsSymm := by
ext
simp [compl, h.apply, eq_comm]
#align matrix.is_symm_compl Matrix.isSymm_compl
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : A.IsSymm) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
{ symm := by simp [h] }
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix_compl Matrix.isAdjMatrix_compl
namespace IsAdjMatrix
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem compl [Zero α] [One α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) : IsAdjMatrix A.compl :=
isAdjMatrix_compl A h.symm
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.compl Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.compl
theorem toGraph_compl_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] (h : IsAdjMatrix A) :
h.compl.toGraph = h.toGraphᶜ := by
ext v w
cases' h.zero_or_one v w with h h <;> by_cases hvw : v = w <;> simp [Matrix.compl, h, hvw]
#align matrix.is_adj_matrix.to_graph_compl_eq Matrix.IsAdjMatrix.toGraph_compl_eq
end IsAdjMatrix
end Compl
end Matrix
open Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
variable (α)
/-- `adjMatrix G α` is the matrix `A` such that `A i j = (1 : α)` if `i` and `j` are
adjacent in the simple graph `G`, and otherwise `A i j = 0`. -/
def adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : Matrix V V α :=
of fun i j => if G.Adj i j then (1 : α) else 0
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix SimpleGraph.adjMatrix
variable {α}
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `adjMatrix`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_apply (v w : V) [Zero α] [One α] :
G.adjMatrix α v w = if G.Adj v w then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_apply
@[simp]
theorem transpose_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α)ᵀ = G.adjMatrix α := by
ext
simp [adj_comm]
#align simple_graph.transpose_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.transpose_adjMatrix
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsSymm :=
transpose_adjMatrix G
#align simple_graph.is_symm_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.isSymm_adjMatrix
variable (α)
/-- The adjacency matrix of `G` is an adjacency matrix. -/
@[simp]
theorem isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix [Zero α] [One α] : (G.adjMatrix α).IsAdjMatrix :=
{ zero_or_one := fun i j => by by_cases h : G.Adj i j <;> simp [h] }
#align simple_graph.is_adj_matrix_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix
/-- The graph induced by the adjacency matrix of `G` is `G` itself. -/
theorem toGraph_adjMatrix_eq [MulZeroOneClass α] [Nontrivial α] :
(G.isAdjMatrix_adjMatrix α).toGraph = G := by
ext
simp only [IsAdjMatrix.toGraph_adj, adjMatrix_apply, ite_eq_left_iff, zero_ne_one]
apply Classical.not_not
#align simple_graph.to_graph_adj_matrix_eq SimpleGraph.toGraph_adjMatrix_eq
variable {α} [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_dotProduct [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct (G.adjMatrix α v) vec = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_dot_product SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_dotProduct
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_adjMatrix [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
dotProduct vec (G.adjMatrix α v) = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp [neighborFinset_eq_filter, dotProduct, sum_filter, Finset.sum_apply]
#align simple_graph.dot_product_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.dotProduct_adjMatrix
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(G.adjMatrix α *ᵥ vec) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
rw [mulVec, adjMatrix_dotProduct]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_vec_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mulVec_apply
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_vecMul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (v : V) (vec : V → α) :
(vec ᵥ* G.adjMatrix α) v = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp only [← dotProduct_adjMatrix, vecMul]
refine congr rfl ?_; ext x
rw [← transpose_apply (adjMatrix α G) x v, transpose_adjMatrix]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_vec_mul_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_vecMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem adjMatrix_mul_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix V V α) (v w : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α * M) v w = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, M u w := by
simp [mul_apply, neighborFinset_eq_filter, sum_filter]
#align simple_graph.adj_matrix_mul_apply SimpleGraph.adjMatrix_mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem mul_adjMatrix_apply [NonAssocSemiring α] (M : Matrix V V α) (v w : V) :
(M * G.adjMatrix α) v w = ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset w, M v u := by
simp [mul_apply, neighborFinset_eq_filter, sum_filter, adj_comm]
#align simple_graph.mul_adj_matrix_apply SimpleGraph.mul_adjMatrix_apply
variable (α)
@[simp]
theorem trace_adjMatrix [AddCommMonoid α] [One α] : Matrix.trace (G.adjMatrix α) = 0 := by
simp [Matrix.trace]
#align simple_graph.trace_adj_matrix SimpleGraph.trace_adjMatrix
variable {α}
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/AdjMatrix.lean | 244 | 245 | theorem adjMatrix_mul_self_apply_self [NonAssocSemiring α] (i : V) :
(G.adjMatrix α * G.adjMatrix α) i i = degree G i := by | simp [filter_true_of_mem]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang, Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
#align_import algebra.module.localized_module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
/-!
# Localized Module
Given a commutative semiring `R`, a multiplicative subset `S ⊆ R` and an `R`-module `M`, we can
localize `M` by `S`. This gives us a `Localization S`-module.
## Main definitions
* `LocalizedModule.r` : the equivalence relation defining this localization, namely
`(m, s) ≈ (m', s')` if and only if there is some `u : S` such that `u • s' • m = u • s • m'`.
* `LocalizedModule M S` : the localized module by `S`.
* `LocalizedModule.mk` : the canonical map sending `(m, s) : M × S ↦ m/s : LocalizedModule M S`
* `LocalizedModule.liftOn` : any well defined function `f : M × S → α` respecting `r` descents to
a function `LocalizedModule M S → α`
* `LocalizedModule.liftOn₂` : any well defined function `f : M × S → M × S → α` respecting `r`
descents to a function `LocalizedModule M S → LocalizedModule M S`
* `LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk` : in the localized module
`mk m s + mk m' s' = mk (s' • m + s • m') (s * s')`
* `LocalizedModule.mk_smul_mk` : in the localized module, for any `r : R`, `s t : S`, `m : M`,
we have `mk r s • mk m t = mk (r • m) (s * t)` where `mk r s : Localization S` is localized ring
by `S`.
* `LocalizedModule.isModule` : `LocalizedModule M S` is a `Localization S`-module.
## Future work
* Redefine `Localization` for monoids and rings to coincide with `LocalizedModule`.
-/
namespace LocalizedModule
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R)
variable (M : Type v) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (T : Type*) [CommSemiring T] [Algebra R T] [IsLocalization S T]
/-- The equivalence relation on `M × S` where `(m1, s1) ≈ (m2, s2)` if and only if
for some (u : S), u * (s2 • m1 - s1 • m2) = 0-/
/- Porting note: We use small letter `r` since `R` is used for a ring. -/
def r (a b : M × S) : Prop :=
∃ u : S, u • b.2 • a.1 = u • a.2 • b.1
#align localized_module.r LocalizedModule.r
theorem r.isEquiv : IsEquiv _ (r S M) :=
{ refl := fun ⟨m, s⟩ => ⟨1, by rw [one_smul]⟩
trans := fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨m3, s3⟩ ⟨u1, hu1⟩ ⟨u2, hu2⟩ => by
use u1 * u2 * s2
-- Put everything in the same shape, sorting the terms using `simp`
have hu1' := congr_arg ((u2 * s3) • ·) hu1.symm
have hu2' := congr_arg ((u1 * s1) • ·) hu2.symm
simp only [← mul_smul, smul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] at hu1' hu2' ⊢
rw [hu2', hu1']
symm := fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => ⟨u, hu.symm⟩ }
#align localized_module.r.is_equiv LocalizedModule.r.isEquiv
instance r.setoid : Setoid (M × S) where
r := r S M
iseqv := ⟨(r.isEquiv S M).refl, (r.isEquiv S M).symm _ _, (r.isEquiv S M).trans _ _ _⟩
#align localized_module.r.setoid LocalizedModule.r.setoid
-- TODO: change `Localization` to use `r'` instead of `r` so that the two types are also defeq,
-- `Localization S = LocalizedModule S R`.
example {R} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R) : ⇑(Localization.r' S) = LocalizedModule.r S R :=
rfl
/-- If `S` is a multiplicative subset of a ring `R` and `M` an `R`-module, then
we can localize `M` by `S`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def _root_.LocalizedModule : Type max u v :=
Quotient (r.setoid S M)
#align localized_module LocalizedModule
section
variable {M S}
/-- The canonical map sending `(m, s) ↦ m/s`-/
def mk (m : M) (s : S) : LocalizedModule S M :=
Quotient.mk' ⟨m, s⟩
#align localized_module.mk LocalizedModule.mk
theorem mk_eq {m m' : M} {s s' : S} : mk m s = mk m' s' ↔ ∃ u : S, u • s' • m = u • s • m' :=
Quotient.eq'
#align localized_module.mk_eq LocalizedModule.mk_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {β : LocalizedModule S M → Prop} (h : ∀ (m : M) (s : S), β (mk m s)) :
∀ x : LocalizedModule S M, β x := by
rintro ⟨⟨m, s⟩⟩
exact h m s
#align localized_module.induction_on LocalizedModule.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on₂ {β : LocalizedModule S M → LocalizedModule S M → Prop}
(h : ∀ (m m' : M) (s s' : S), β (mk m s) (mk m' s')) : ∀ x y, β x y := by
rintro ⟨⟨m, s⟩⟩ ⟨⟨m', s'⟩⟩
exact h m m' s s'
#align localized_module.induction_on₂ LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
/-- If `f : M × S → α` respects the equivalence relation `LocalizedModule.r`, then
`f` descents to a map `LocalizedModule M S → α`.
-/
def liftOn {α : Type*} (x : LocalizedModule S M) (f : M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p p' : M × S), p ≈ p' → f p = f p') : α :=
Quotient.liftOn x f wd
#align localized_module.lift_on LocalizedModule.liftOn
theorem liftOn_mk {α : Type*} {f : M × S → α} (wd : ∀ (p p' : M × S), p ≈ p' → f p = f p')
(m : M) (s : S) : liftOn (mk m s) f wd = f ⟨m, s⟩ := by convert Quotient.liftOn_mk f wd ⟨m, s⟩
#align localized_module.lift_on_mk LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk
/-- If `f : M × S → M × S → α` respects the equivalence relation `LocalizedModule.r`, then
`f` descents to a map `LocalizedModule M S → LocalizedModule M S → α`.
-/
def liftOn₂ {α : Type*} (x y : LocalizedModule S M) (f : M × S → M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p q p' q' : M × S), p ≈ p' → q ≈ q' → f p q = f p' q') : α :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ x y f wd
#align localized_module.lift_on₂ LocalizedModule.liftOn₂
theorem liftOn₂_mk {α : Type*} (f : M × S → M × S → α)
(wd : ∀ (p q p' q' : M × S), p ≈ p' → q ≈ q' → f p q = f p' q') (m m' : M)
(s s' : S) : liftOn₂ (mk m s) (mk m' s') f wd = f ⟨m, s⟩ ⟨m', s'⟩ := by
convert Quotient.liftOn₂_mk f wd _ _
#align localized_module.lift_on₂_mk LocalizedModule.liftOn₂_mk
instance : Zero (LocalizedModule S M) :=
⟨mk 0 1⟩
/-- If `S` contains `0` then the localization at `S` is trivial. -/
theorem subsingleton (h : 0 ∈ S) : Subsingleton (LocalizedModule S M) := by
refine ⟨fun a b ↦ ?_⟩
induction a,b using LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨⟨0, h⟩, by simp only [Submonoid.mk_smul, zero_smul]⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_mk (s : S) : mk (0 : M) s = 0 :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, smul_zero, smul_zero, one_smul]⟩
#align localized_module.zero_mk LocalizedModule.zero_mk
instance : Add (LocalizedModule S M) where
add p1 p2 :=
liftOn₂ p1 p2 (fun x y => mk (y.2 • x.1 + x.2 • y.1) (x.2 * y.2)) <|
fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨m1', s1'⟩ ⟨m2', s2'⟩ ⟨u1, hu1⟩ ⟨u2, hu2⟩ =>
mk_eq.mpr
⟨u1 * u2, by
-- Put everything in the same shape, sorting the terms using `simp`
have hu1' := congr_arg ((u2 * s2 * s2') • ·) hu1
have hu2' := congr_arg ((u1 * s1 * s1') • ·) hu2
simp only [smul_add, ← mul_smul, smul_assoc, mul_assoc, mul_comm,
mul_left_comm] at hu1' hu2' ⊢
rw [hu1', hu2']⟩
theorem mk_add_mk {m1 m2 : M} {s1 s2 : S} :
mk m1 s1 + mk m2 s2 = mk (s2 • m1 + s1 • m2) (s1 * s2) :=
mk_eq.mpr <| ⟨1, rfl⟩
#align localized_module.mk_add_mk LocalizedModule.mk_add_mk
/-- Porting note: Some auxiliary lemmas are declared with `private` in the original mathlib3 file.
We take that policy here as well, and remove the `#align` lines accordingly. -/
private theorem add_assoc' (x y z : LocalizedModule S M) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
induction' x using LocalizedModule.induction_on with mx sx
induction' y using LocalizedModule.induction_on with my sy
induction' z using LocalizedModule.induction_on with mz sz
simp only [mk_add_mk, smul_add]
refine mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, ?_⟩
rw [one_smul, one_smul]
congr 1
· rw [mul_assoc]
· rw [eq_comm, mul_comm, add_assoc, mul_smul, mul_smul, ← mul_smul sx sz, mul_comm, mul_smul]
private theorem add_comm' (x y : LocalizedModule S M) : x + y = y + x :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂ (fun m m' s s' => by rw [mk_add_mk, mk_add_mk, add_comm, mul_comm])
x y
private theorem zero_add' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : 0 + x = x :=
induction_on
(fun m s => by
rw [← zero_mk s, mk_add_mk, smul_zero, zero_add, mk_eq];
exact ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, mul_smul, one_smul]⟩)
x
private theorem add_zero' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : x + 0 = x :=
induction_on
(fun m s => by
rw [← zero_mk s, mk_add_mk, smul_zero, add_zero, mk_eq];
exact ⟨1, by rw [one_smul, mul_smul, one_smul]⟩)
x
instance hasNatSMul : SMul ℕ (LocalizedModule S M) where smul n := nsmulRec n
#align localized_module.has_nat_smul LocalizedModule.hasNatSMul
private theorem nsmul_zero' (x : LocalizedModule S M) : (0 : ℕ) • x = 0 :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on (fun _ _ => rfl) x
private theorem nsmul_succ' (n : ℕ) (x : LocalizedModule S M) : n.succ • x = n • x + x :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on (fun _ _ => rfl) x
instance : AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S M) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := add_assoc'
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add'
add_zero := add_zero'
nsmul := (· • ·)
nsmul_zero := nsmul_zero'
nsmul_succ := nsmul_succ'
add_comm := add_comm'
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] : Neg (LocalizedModule S M) where
neg p :=
liftOn p (fun x => LocalizedModule.mk (-x.1) x.2) fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => by
rw [mk_eq]
exact ⟨u, by simpa⟩
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] : AddCommGroup (LocalizedModule S M) :=
{ show AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S M) by infer_instance with
add_left_neg := by
rintro ⟨m, s⟩
change
(liftOn (mk m s) (fun x => mk (-x.1) x.2) fun ⟨m1, s1⟩ ⟨m2, s2⟩ ⟨u, hu⟩ => by
rw [mk_eq]
exact ⟨u, by simpa⟩) +
mk m s =
0
rw [liftOn_mk, mk_add_mk]
simp
-- TODO: fix the diamond
zsmul := zsmulRec }
theorem mk_neg {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {m : M} {s : S} : mk (-m) s = -mk m s :=
rfl
#align localized_module.mk_neg LocalizedModule.mk_neg
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Monoid (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ mul := fun m₁ m₂ =>
liftOn₂ m₁ m₂ (fun x₁ x₂ => LocalizedModule.mk (x₁.1 * x₂.1) (x₁.2 * x₂.2))
(by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨b₁, t₁⟩ ⟨b₂, t₂⟩ ⟨u₁, e₁⟩ ⟨u₂, e₂⟩
rw [mk_eq]
use u₁ * u₂
dsimp only at e₁ e₂ ⊢
rw [eq_comm]
trans (u₁ • t₁ • a₁) • u₂ • t₂ • a₂
on_goal 1 => rw [e₁, e₂]
on_goal 2 => rw [eq_comm]
all_goals
rw [smul_smul, mul_mul_mul_comm, ← smul_eq_mul, ← smul_eq_mul A, smul_smul_smul_comm,
mul_smul, mul_smul])
one := mk 1 (1 : S)
one_mul := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_mul, one_smul]⟩
mul_one := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [mul_one, one_smul]⟩
mul_assoc := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc, mul_right_comm] }
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Semiring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show (AddCommMonoid (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance,
show (Monoid (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance with
left_distrib := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_add, mul_add, mul_smul_comm, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm]
right_distrib := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩ ⟨a₃, s₃⟩
apply mk_eq.mpr _
use 1
simp only [one_mul, smul_add, add_mul, smul_smul, ← mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc,
mul_right_comm]
zero_mul := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [zero_mul, smul_zero]⟩
mul_zero := by
rintro ⟨a, s⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [mul_zero, smul_zero]⟩ }
instance {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
CommSemiring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show Semiring (LocalizedModule S A) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_smul, mul_comm]⟩ }
instance {A : Type*} [Ring A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
Ring (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (LocalizedModule S A)),
inferInstanceAs (Semiring (LocalizedModule S A)) with }
instance {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [Algebra R A] {S : Submonoid R} :
CommRing (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ show (Ring (LocalizedModule S A)) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := by
rintro ⟨a₁, s₁⟩ ⟨a₂, s₂⟩
exact mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp only [one_smul, mul_comm]⟩ }
theorem mk_mul_mk {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {a₁ a₂ : A} {s₁ s₂ : S} :
mk a₁ s₁ * mk a₂ s₂ = mk (a₁ * a₂) (s₁ * s₂) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.mk_mul_mk LocalizedModule.mk_mul_mk
noncomputable instance : SMul T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul x p :=
let a := IsLocalization.sec S x
liftOn p (fun p ↦ mk (a.1 • p.1) (a.2 * p.2))
(by
rintro p p' ⟨s, h⟩
refine mk_eq.mpr ⟨s, ?_⟩
calc
_ = a.2 • a.1 • s • p'.2 • p.1 := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_smul]; ring_nf
_ = a.2 • a.1 • s • p.2 • p'.1 := by rw [h]
_ = s • (a.2 * p.2) • a.1 • p'.1 := by
simp_rw [Submonoid.smul_def, ← mul_smul, Submonoid.coe_mul]; ring_nf )
theorem smul_def (x : T) (m : M) (s : S) :
x • mk m s = mk ((IsLocalization.sec S x).1 • m) ((IsLocalization.sec S x).2 * s) := rfl
theorem mk'_smul_mk (r : R) (m : M) (s s' : S) :
IsLocalization.mk' T r s • mk m s' = mk (r • m) (s * s') := by
rw [smul_def, mk_eq]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := IsLocalization.eq.mp <| IsLocalization.mk'_sec T (IsLocalization.mk' T r s)
use c
simp_rw [← mul_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, ← mul_smul, ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ (s':R), mul_assoc, hc]
theorem mk_smul_mk (r : R) (m : M) (s t : S) :
Localization.mk r s • mk m t = mk (r • m) (s * t) := by
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk']
exact mk'_smul_mk ..
#align localized_module.mk_smul_mk LocalizedModule.mk_smul_mk
variable {T}
private theorem one_smul_aux (p : LocalizedModule S M) : (1 : T) • p = p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [show (1:T) = IsLocalization.mk' T (1:R) (1:S) by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_one, map_one]]
rw [mk'_smul_mk, one_smul, one_mul]
private theorem mul_smul_aux (x y : T) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
(x * y) • p = x • y • p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, ← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T y]
simp_rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_mul, mk'_smul_mk, ← mul_smul, mul_assoc]
private theorem smul_add_aux (x : T) (p q : LocalizedModule S M) :
x • (p + q) = x • p + x • q := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
induction' q using LocalizedModule.induction_on with n t
rw [smul_def, smul_def, mk_add_mk, mk_add_mk]
rw [show x • _ = IsLocalization.mk' T _ _ • _ by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T]]
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_cancel _ _ (IsLocalization.sec S x).2, mk'_smul_mk]
congr 1
· simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, smul_add, ← mul_smul, Submonoid.coe_mul]; ring_nf
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm] -- ring does not work here
private theorem smul_zero_aux (x : T) : x • (0 : LocalizedModule S M) = 0 := by
erw [smul_def, smul_zero, zero_mk]
private theorem add_smul_aux (x y : T) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
(x + y) • p = x • p + y • p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [smul_def T x, smul_def T y, mk_add_mk, show (x + y) • _ = IsLocalization.mk' T _ _ • _ by
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, ← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T y,
← IsLocalization.mk'_add, IsLocalization.mk'_cancel _ _ s], mk'_smul_mk, ← smul_assoc,
← smul_assoc, ← add_smul]
congr 1
· simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.coe_mul, smul_eq_mul]; ring_nf
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, mul_assoc] -- ring does not work here
private theorem zero_smul_aux (p : LocalizedModule S M) : (0 : T) • p = 0 := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [show (0:T) = IsLocalization.mk' T (0:R) (1:S) by rw [IsLocalization.mk'_zero], mk'_smul_mk,
zero_smul, zero_mk]
noncomputable instance isModule : Module T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := one_smul_aux
mul_smul := mul_smul_aux
smul_add := smul_add_aux
smul_zero := smul_zero_aux
add_smul := add_smul_aux
zero_smul := zero_smul_aux
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel_common_left (s' s : S) (m : M) : mk (s' • m) (s' * s) = mk m s :=
mk_eq.mpr
⟨1, by
simp only [mul_smul, one_smul]
rw [smul_comm]⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel_common_left LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel (s : S) (m : M) : mk (s • m) s = mk m 1 :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel LocalizedModule.mk_cancel
@[simp]
theorem mk_cancel_common_right (s s' : S) (m : M) : mk (s' • m) (s * s') = mk m s :=
mk_eq.mpr ⟨1, by simp [mul_smul]⟩
#align localized_module.mk_cancel_common_right LocalizedModule.mk_cancel_common_right
noncomputable instance isModule' : Module R (LocalizedModule S M) :=
{ Module.compHom (LocalizedModule S M) <| algebraMap R (Localization S) with }
#align localized_module.is_module' LocalizedModule.isModule'
theorem smul'_mk (r : R) (s : S) (m : M) : r • mk m s = mk (r • m) s := by
erw [mk_smul_mk r m 1 s, one_mul]
#align localized_module.smul'_mk LocalizedModule.smul'_mk
theorem smul'_mul {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : T) (p₁ p₂ : LocalizedModule S A) :
x • p₁ * p₂ = x • (p₁ * p₂) := by
induction p₁, p₂ using induction_on₂ with | _ a₁ s₁ a₂ s₂ => _
rw [mk_mul_mk, smul_def, smul_def, mk_mul_mk, mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc]
theorem mul_smul' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (x : T) (p₁ p₂ : LocalizedModule S A) :
p₁ * x • p₂ = x • (p₁ * p₂) := by
induction p₁, p₂ using induction_on₂ with | _ a₁ s₁ a₂ s₂ => _
rw [smul_def, mk_mul_mk, mk_mul_mk, smul_def, mul_left_comm, mul_smul_comm]
variable (T)
noncomputable instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : Algebra T (LocalizedModule S A) :=
Algebra.ofModule smul'_mul mul_smul'
theorem algebraMap_mk' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (a : R) (s : S) :
algebraMap _ _ (IsLocalization.mk' T a s) = mk (algebraMap R A a) s := by
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
change _ • mk _ _ = _
rw [mk'_smul_mk, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one, mul_one]
theorem algebraMap_mk {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (a : R) (s : S) :
algebraMap _ _ (Localization.mk a s) = mk (algebraMap R A a) s := by
rw [Localization.mk_eq_mk']
exact algebraMap_mk' ..
#align localized_module.algebra_map_mk LocalizedModule.algebraMap_mk
instance : IsScalarTower R T (LocalizedModule S M) where
smul_assoc r x p := by
induction' p using LocalizedModule.induction_on with m s
rw [← IsLocalization.mk'_sec (M := S) T x, IsLocalization.smul_mk', mk'_smul_mk, mk'_smul_mk,
smul'_mk, mul_smul]
noncomputable instance algebra' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] :
Algebra R (LocalizedModule S A) :=
{ (algebraMap (Localization S) (LocalizedModule S A)).comp (algebraMap R <| Localization S),
show Module R (LocalizedModule S A) by infer_instance with
commutes' := by
intro r x
induction x using induction_on with | _ a s => _
dsimp
rw [← Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap, algebraMap_mk, mk_mul_mk, mk_mul_mk, mul_comm,
Algebra.commutes]
smul_def' := by
intro r x
induction x using induction_on with | _ a s => _
dsimp
rw [← Localization.mk_one_eq_algebraMap, algebraMap_mk, mk_mul_mk, smul'_mk,
Algebra.smul_def, one_mul] }
#align localized_module.algebra' LocalizedModule.algebra'
section
variable (S M)
/-- The function `m ↦ m / 1` as an `R`-linear map.
-/
@[simps]
def mkLinearMap : M →ₗ[R] LocalizedModule S M where
toFun m := mk m 1
map_add' x y := by simp [mk_add_mk]
map_smul' r x := (smul'_mk _ _ _).symm
#align localized_module.mk_linear_map LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap
end
/-- For any `s : S`, there is an `R`-linear map given by `a/b ↦ a/(b*s)`.
-/
@[simps]
def divBy (s : S) : LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] LocalizedModule S M where
toFun p :=
p.liftOn (fun p => mk p.1 (p.2 * s)) fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨a', b'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩ =>
mk_eq.mpr ⟨c, by rw [mul_smul, mul_smul, smul_comm _ s, smul_comm _ s, eq1, smul_comm _ s,
smul_comm _ s]⟩
map_add' x y := by
refine x.induction_on₂ ?_ y
intro m₁ m₂ t₁ t₂
simp_rw [mk_add_mk, LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, mk_add_mk, mul_smul, mul_comm _ s, mul_assoc,
smul_comm _ s, ← smul_add, mul_left_comm s t₁ t₂, mk_cancel_common_left s]
map_smul' r x := by
refine x.induction_on (fun _ _ ↦ ?_)
dsimp only
change liftOn (mk _ _) _ _ = r • (liftOn (mk _ _) _ _)
simp_rw [liftOn_mk, mul_assoc, ← smul_def]
congr!
#align localized_module.div_by LocalizedModule.divBy
theorem divBy_mul_by (s : S) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
divBy s (algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s p) = p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
rw [Module.algebraMap_end_apply, divBy_apply]
erw [smul_def]
rw [LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, mul_assoc, ← smul_def]
erw [smul'_mk]
rw [← Submonoid.smul_def, mk_cancel_common_right _ s]
#align localized_module.div_by_mul_by LocalizedModule.divBy_mul_by
theorem mul_by_divBy (s : S) (p : LocalizedModule S M) :
algebraMap R (Module.End R (LocalizedModule S M)) s (divBy s p) = p :=
p.induction_on fun m t => by
rw [divBy_apply, Module.algebraMap_end_apply, LocalizedModule.liftOn_mk, smul'_mk,
← Submonoid.smul_def, mk_cancel_common_right _ s]
#align localized_module.mul_by_div_by LocalizedModule.mul_by_divBy
end
end LocalizedModule
section IsLocalizedModule
universe u v
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (S : Submonoid R)
variable {M M' M'' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M'']
variable {A : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [Module A M'] [IsLocalization S A]
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M''] [IsScalarTower R A M']
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
/-- The characteristic predicate for localized module.
`IsLocalizedModule S f` describes that `f : M ⟶ M'` is the localization map identifying `M'` as
`LocalizedModule S M`.
-/
@[mk_iff] class IsLocalizedModule : Prop where
map_units : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M') x)
surj' : ∀ y : M', ∃ x : M × S, x.2 • y = f x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ {x₁ x₂}, f x₁ = f x₂ → ∃ c : S, c • x₁ = c • x₂
#align is_localized_module IsLocalizedModule
attribute [nolint docBlame] IsLocalizedModule.map_units IsLocalizedModule.surj'
IsLocalizedModule.exists_of_eq
-- Porting note: Manually added to make `S` and `f` explicit.
lemma IsLocalizedModule.surj [IsLocalizedModule S f] (y : M') : ∃ x : M × S, x.2 • y = f x.1 :=
surj' y
-- Porting note: Manually added to make `S` and `f` explicit.
lemma IsLocalizedModule.eq_iff_exists [IsLocalizedModule S f] {x₁ x₂} :
f x₁ = f x₂ ↔ ∃ c : S, c • x₁ = c • x₂ :=
Iff.intro exists_of_eq fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
apply_fun f at h
simp_rw [f.map_smul_of_tower, Submonoid.smul_def, ← Module.algebraMap_end_apply R R] at h
exact ((Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp <| map_units f c).1 h
theorem IsLocalizedModule.of_linearEquiv (e : M' ≃ₗ[R] M'') [hf : IsLocalizedModule S f] :
IsLocalizedModule S (e ∘ₗ f : M →ₗ[R] M'') where
map_units s := by
rw [show algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') s = e ∘ₗ (algebraMap R (Module.End R M') s) ∘ₗ e.symm
by ext; simp, Module.End_isUnit_iff, LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, EquivLike.comp_bijective, EquivLike.bijective_comp]
exact (Module.End_isUnit_iff _).mp <| hf.map_units s
surj' x := by
obtain ⟨p, h⟩ := hf.surj' (e.symm x)
exact ⟨p, by rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, ← e.congr_arg h,
Submonoid.smul_def, Submonoid.smul_def, LinearEquiv.map_smul, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]⟩
exists_of_eq h := by
simp_rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply,
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq] at h
exact hf.exists_of_eq h
variable (M) in
lemma isLocalizedModule_id (R') [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R R'] [IsLocalization S R'] [Module R' M]
[IsScalarTower R R' M] : IsLocalizedModule S (.id : M →ₗ[R] M) where
map_units s := by
rw [← (Algebra.lsmul R (A := R') R M).commutes]; exact (IsLocalization.map_units R' s).map _
surj' m := ⟨(m, 1), one_smul _ _⟩
exists_of_eq h := ⟨1, congr_arg _ h⟩
variable {S} in
theorem isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization {A Aₛ} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A] [CommSemiring Aₛ]
[Algebra A Aₛ] [Algebra R Aₛ] [IsScalarTower R A Aₛ] :
IsLocalizedModule S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A Aₛ).toLinearMap ↔
IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid A S) Aₛ := by
rw [isLocalizedModule_iff, isLocalization_iff]
refine and_congr ?_ (and_congr (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ ?_) (forall₂_congr fun _ _ ↦ ?_))
· simp_rw [← (Algebra.lmul R Aₛ).commutes, Algebra.lmul_isUnit_iff, Subtype.forall,
Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submonoid.coe_map,
Set.forall_mem_image, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
· simp_rw [Prod.exists, Subtype.exists, Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid]
simp [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply, Submonoid.mk_smul, Algebra.smul_def, mul_comm]
· congr!; simp_rw [Subtype.exists, Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid]; simp [Algebra.smul_def]
instance {A Aₛ} [CommSemiring A] [Algebra R A][CommSemiring Aₛ] [Algebra A Aₛ] [Algebra R Aₛ]
[IsScalarTower R A Aₛ] [h : IsLocalization (Algebra.algebraMapSubmonoid A S) Aₛ] :
IsLocalizedModule S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A Aₛ).toLinearMap :=
isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization.mpr h
lemma isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization' (R') [CommSemiring R'] [Algebra R R'] :
IsLocalizedModule S (Algebra.ofId R R').toLinearMap ↔ IsLocalization S R' := by
convert isLocalizedModule_iff_isLocalization (S := S) (A := R) (Aₛ := R')
exact (Submonoid.map_id S).symm
namespace LocalizedModule
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `LocalizedModule S M → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift' (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') x)) : LocalizedModule S M → M'' :=
fun m =>
m.liftOn (fun p => (h p.2).unit⁻¹.val <| g p.1) fun ⟨m, s⟩ ⟨m', s'⟩ ⟨c, eq1⟩ => by
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`. This does nothing here.
dsimp only
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def] at eq1
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← map_smul, eq_comm,
Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff]
have : c • s • g m' = c • s' • g m := by
simp only [Submonoid.smul_def, ← g.map_smul, eq1]
have : Function.Injective (h c).unit.inv := by
rw [Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse]
refine ⟨(h c).unit, ?_⟩
intro x
change ((h c).unit.1 * (h c).unit.inv) x = x
simp only [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, IsUnit.mul_val_inv, LinearMap.one_apply]
apply_fun (h c).unit.inv
erw [Units.inv_eq_val_inv, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ←
(h c).unit⁻¹.val.map_smul]
symm
rw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, ← g.map_smul, ← g.map_smul, ← g.map_smul, ←
g.map_smul, eq1]
#align localized_module.lift' LocalizedModule.lift'
theorem lift'_mk (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(m : M) (s : S) :
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (h s).unit⁻¹.val (g m) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.lift'_mk LocalizedModule.lift'_mk
theorem lift'_add (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(x y) :
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (x + y) =
LocalizedModule.lift' S g h x + LocalizedModule.lift' S g h y :=
LocalizedModule.induction_on₂
(by
intro a a' b b'
erw [LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2 h3`. This only generalize `h1`.
erw [map_add, Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, smul_add, ← map_smul,
← map_smul, ← map_smul]
congr 1 <;> symm
· erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, mul_smul, ← map_smul]
rfl
· dsimp
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, mul_comm, mul_smul, ← map_smul]
rfl)
x y
#align localized_module.lift'_add LocalizedModule.lift'_add
theorem lift'_smul (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x))
(r : R) (m) : r • LocalizedModule.lift' S g h m = LocalizedModule.lift' S g h (r • m) :=
m.induction_on fun a b => by
rw [LocalizedModule.lift'_mk, LocalizedModule.smul'_mk, LocalizedModule.lift'_mk]
-- Porting note: We remove `generalize_proofs h1 h2`. This does nothing here.
rw [← map_smul, ← g.map_smul]
#align localized_module.lift'_smul LocalizedModule.lift'_smul
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `LocalizedModule S M → M''`.
-/
noncomputable def lift (g : M →ₗ[R] M'')
(h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
LocalizedModule S M →ₗ[R] M'' where
toFun := LocalizedModule.lift' S g h
map_add' := LocalizedModule.lift'_add S g h
map_smul' r x := by rw [LocalizedModule.lift'_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
#align localized_module.lift LocalizedModule.lift
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
`lift g m s = s⁻¹ • g m`.
-/
theorem lift_mk
(g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit (algebraMap R (Module.End R M'') x)) (m : M) (s : S) :
LocalizedModule.lift S g h (LocalizedModule.mk m s) = (h s).unit⁻¹.val (g m) :=
rfl
#align localized_module.lift_mk LocalizedModule.lift_mk
/--
If `g` is a linear map `M → M''` such that all scalar multiplication by `s : S` is invertible, then
there is a linear map `lift g ∘ mkLinearMap = g`.
-/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/LocalizedModule.lean | 713 | 716 | theorem lift_comp (g : M →ₗ[R] M'') (h : ∀ x : S, IsUnit ((algebraMap R (Module.End R M'')) x)) :
(lift S g h).comp (mkLinearMap S M) = g := by |
ext x; dsimp; rw [LocalizedModule.lift_mk]
erw [Module.End_algebraMap_isUnit_inv_apply_eq_iff, one_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
#align_import combinatorics.additive.behrend from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
#align add_salem_spencer_frontier threeAPFree_frontier
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_ball (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
#align add_salem_spencer_sphere threeAPFree_sphere
namespace Behrend
variable {α β : Type*} {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
#align behrend.box Behrend.box
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
#align behrend.mem_box Behrend.mem_box
@[simp]
theorem card_box : (box n d).card = d ^ n := by simp [box]
#align behrend.card_box Behrend.card_box
@[simp]
theorem box_zero : box (n + 1) 0 = ∅ := by simp [box]
#align behrend.box_zero Behrend.box_zero
/-- The intersection of the sphere of radius `√k` with the integer points in the positive
quadrant. -/
def sphere (n d k : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
(box n d).filter fun x => ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = k
#align behrend.sphere Behrend.sphere
theorem sphere_zero_subset : sphere n d 0 ⊆ 0 := fun x => by simp [sphere, Function.funext_iff]
#align behrend.sphere_zero_subset Behrend.sphere_zero_subset
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 118 | 118 | theorem sphere_zero_right (n k : ℕ) : sphere (n + 1) 0 k = ∅ := by | simp [sphere]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.IntegralNormalization
#align_import ring_theory.algebraic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Algebraic elements and algebraic extensions
An element of an R-algebra is algebraic over R if it is the root of a nonzero polynomial.
An R-algebra is algebraic over R if and only if all its elements are algebraic over R.
The main result in this file proves transitivity of algebraicity:
a tower of algebraic field extensions is algebraic.
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial
section
variable (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- An element of an R-algebra is algebraic over R if it is a root of a nonzero polynomial
with coefficients in R. -/
def IsAlgebraic (x : A) : Prop :=
∃ p : R[X], p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval x p = 0
#align is_algebraic IsAlgebraic
/-- An element of an R-algebra is transcendental over R if it is not algebraic over R. -/
def Transcendental (x : A) : Prop :=
¬IsAlgebraic R x
#align transcendental Transcendental
theorem is_transcendental_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (x : A) : Transcendental R x :=
fun ⟨p, h, _⟩ => h <| Subsingleton.elim p 0
#align is_transcendental_of_subsingleton is_transcendental_of_subsingleton
variable {R}
/-- A subalgebra is algebraic if all its elements are algebraic. -/
nonrec
def Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic (S : Subalgebra R A) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ S, IsAlgebraic R x
#align subalgebra.is_algebraic Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic
variable (R A)
/-- An algebra is algebraic if all its elements are algebraic. -/
protected class Algebra.IsAlgebraic : Prop :=
isAlgebraic : ∀ x : A, IsAlgebraic R x
#align algebra.is_algebraic Algebra.IsAlgebraic
variable {R A}
lemma Algebra.isAlgebraic_def : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A ↔ ∀ x : A, IsAlgebraic R x :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
/-- A subalgebra is algebraic if and only if it is algebraic as an algebra. -/
theorem Subalgebra.isAlgebraic_iff (S : Subalgebra R A) :
S.IsAlgebraic ↔ @Algebra.IsAlgebraic R S _ _ S.algebra := by
delta Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic
rw [Subtype.forall', Algebra.isAlgebraic_def]
refine forall_congr' fun x => exists_congr fun p => and_congr Iff.rfl ?_
have h : Function.Injective S.val := Subtype.val_injective
conv_rhs => rw [← h.eq_iff, AlgHom.map_zero]
rw [← aeval_algHom_apply, S.val_apply]
#align subalgebra.is_algebraic_iff Subalgebra.isAlgebraic_iff
/-- An algebra is algebraic if and only if it is algebraic as a subalgebra. -/
theorem Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A ↔ (⊤ : Subalgebra R A).IsAlgebraic := by
delta Subalgebra.IsAlgebraic
simp only [Algebra.isAlgebraic_def, Algebra.mem_top, forall_prop_of_true, iff_self_iff]
#align algebra.is_algebraic_iff Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff
theorem isAlgebraic_iff_not_injective {x : A} :
IsAlgebraic R x ↔ ¬Function.Injective (Polynomial.aeval x : R[X] →ₐ[R] A) := by
simp only [IsAlgebraic, injective_iff_map_eq_zero, not_forall, and_comm, exists_prop]
#align is_algebraic_iff_not_injective isAlgebraic_iff_not_injective
end
section zero_ne_one
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*} {A : Type v} [CommRing R]
variable [CommRing S] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A]
/-- An integral element of an algebra is algebraic. -/
theorem IsIntegral.isAlgebraic [Nontrivial R] {x : A} : IsIntegral R x → IsAlgebraic R x :=
fun ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩ => ⟨p, hp.ne_zero, hpx⟩
#align is_integral.is_algebraic IsIntegral.isAlgebraic
instance Algebra.IsIntegral.isAlgebraic [Nontrivial R] [Algebra.IsIntegral R A] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A := ⟨fun a ↦ (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral a).isAlgebraic⟩
theorem isAlgebraic_zero [Nontrivial R] : IsAlgebraic R (0 : A) :=
⟨_, X_ne_zero, aeval_X 0⟩
#align is_algebraic_zero isAlgebraic_zero
/-- An element of `R` is algebraic, when viewed as an element of the `R`-algebra `A`. -/
theorem isAlgebraic_algebraMap [Nontrivial R] (x : R) : IsAlgebraic R (algebraMap R A x) :=
⟨_, X_sub_C_ne_zero x, by rw [_root_.map_sub, aeval_X, aeval_C, sub_self]⟩
#align is_algebraic_algebra_map isAlgebraic_algebraMap
theorem isAlgebraic_one [Nontrivial R] : IsAlgebraic R (1 : A) := by
rw [← _root_.map_one (algebraMap R A)]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap 1
#align is_algebraic_one isAlgebraic_one
theorem isAlgebraic_nat [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) : IsAlgebraic R (n : A) := by
rw [← map_natCast (_ : R →+* A) n]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap (Nat.cast n)
#align is_algebraic_nat isAlgebraic_nat
theorem isAlgebraic_int [Nontrivial R] (n : ℤ) : IsAlgebraic R (n : A) := by
rw [← _root_.map_intCast (algebraMap R A)]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap (Int.cast n)
#align is_algebraic_int isAlgebraic_int
theorem isAlgebraic_rat (R : Type u) {A : Type v} [DivisionRing A] [Field R] [Algebra R A] (n : ℚ) :
IsAlgebraic R (n : A) := by
rw [← map_ratCast (algebraMap R A)]
exact isAlgebraic_algebraMap (Rat.cast n)
#align is_algebraic_rat isAlgebraic_rat
theorem isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [Field R] [Field A] [Algebra R A]
{p : R[X]} {x : A} (hx : x ∈ p.rootSet A) : IsAlgebraic R x :=
⟨p, ne_zero_of_mem_rootSet hx, aeval_eq_zero_of_mem_rootSet hx⟩
#align is_algebraic_of_mem_root_set isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet
open IsScalarTower
protected theorem IsAlgebraic.algebraMap {a : S} :
IsAlgebraic R a → IsAlgebraic R (algebraMap S A a) := fun ⟨f, hf₁, hf₂⟩ =>
⟨f, hf₁, by rw [aeval_algebraMap_apply, hf₂, map_zero]⟩
#align is_algebraic_algebra_map_of_is_algebraic IsAlgebraic.algebraMap
section
variable {B} [Ring B] [Algebra R B]
/-- This is slightly more general than `IsAlgebraic.algebraMap` in that it
allows noncommutative intermediate rings `A`. -/
protected theorem IsAlgebraic.algHom (f : A →ₐ[R] B) {a : A}
(h : IsAlgebraic R a) : IsAlgebraic R (f a) :=
let ⟨p, hp, ha⟩ := h
⟨p, hp, by rw [aeval_algHom, f.comp_apply, ha, map_zero]⟩
#align is_algebraic_alg_hom_of_is_algebraic IsAlgebraic.algHom
theorem isAlgebraic_algHom_iff (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f)
{a : A} : IsAlgebraic R (f a) ↔ IsAlgebraic R a :=
⟨fun ⟨p, hp0, hp⟩ ↦ ⟨p, hp0, hf <| by rwa [map_zero, ← f.comp_apply, ← aeval_algHom]⟩,
IsAlgebraic.algHom f⟩
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_injective (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (hf : Function.Injective f)
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic R B] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A :=
⟨fun _ ↦ (isAlgebraic_algHom_iff f hf).mp (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic _)⟩
/-- Transfer `Algebra.IsAlgebraic` across an `AlgEquiv`. -/
theorem AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B)
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic R B :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_injective e.symm.toAlgHom e.symm.injective
#align alg_equiv.is_algebraic AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic
theorem AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic_iff (e : A ≃ₐ[R] B) :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A ↔ Algebra.IsAlgebraic R B :=
⟨fun _ ↦ e.isAlgebraic, fun _ ↦ e.symm.isAlgebraic⟩
#align alg_equiv.is_algebraic_iff AlgEquiv.isAlgebraic_iff
end
theorem isAlgebraic_algebraMap_iff {a : S} (h : Function.Injective (algebraMap S A)) :
IsAlgebraic R (algebraMap S A a) ↔ IsAlgebraic R a :=
isAlgebraic_algHom_iff (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S A) h
#align is_algebraic_algebra_map_iff isAlgebraic_algebraMap_iff
theorem IsAlgebraic.of_pow {r : A} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (ht : IsAlgebraic R (r ^ n)) :
IsAlgebraic R r := by
obtain ⟨p, p_nonzero, hp⟩ := ht
refine ⟨Polynomial.expand _ n p, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Polynomial.expand_ne_zero hn]
· rwa [Polynomial.expand_aeval n p r]
#align is_algebraic_of_pow IsAlgebraic.of_pow
theorem Transcendental.pow {r : A} (ht : Transcendental R r) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
Transcendental R (r ^ n) := fun ht' ↦ ht <| ht'.of_pow hn
#align transcendental.pow Transcendental.pow
lemma IsAlgebraic.invOf {x : S} [Invertible x] (h : IsAlgebraic R x) : IsAlgebraic R (⅟ x) := by
obtain ⟨p, hp, hp'⟩ := h
refine ⟨p.reverse, by simpa using hp, ?_⟩
rwa [Polynomial.aeval_def, Polynomial.eval₂_reverse_eq_zero_iff, ← Polynomial.aeval_def]
lemma IsAlgebraic.invOf_iff {x : S} [Invertible x] :
IsAlgebraic R (⅟ x) ↔ IsAlgebraic R x :=
⟨IsAlgebraic.invOf, IsAlgebraic.invOf⟩
lemma IsAlgebraic.inv_iff {K} [Field K] [Algebra R K] {x : K} :
IsAlgebraic R (x⁻¹) ↔ IsAlgebraic R x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
letI := invertibleOfNonzero hx
exact IsAlgebraic.invOf_iff (R := R) (x := x)
alias ⟨_, IsAlgebraic.inv⟩ := IsAlgebraic.inv_iff
end zero_ne_one
section Field
variable {K : Type u} {A : Type v} [Field K] [Ring A] [Algebra K A]
/-- An element of an algebra over a field is algebraic if and only if it is integral. -/
theorem isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral {x : A} : IsAlgebraic K x ↔ IsIntegral K x := by
refine ⟨?_, IsIntegral.isAlgebraic⟩
rintro ⟨p, hp, hpx⟩
refine ⟨_, monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv hp, ?_⟩
rw [← aeval_def, AlgHom.map_mul, hpx, zero_mul]
#align is_algebraic_iff_is_integral isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral
protected theorem Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A ↔ Algebra.IsIntegral K A := by
rw [Algebra.isAlgebraic_def, Algebra.isIntegral_def,
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
#align algebra.is_algebraic_iff_is_integral Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral
alias ⟨IsAlgebraic.isIntegral, _⟩ := isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral
/-- This used to be an `alias` of `Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral` but that would make
`Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A` an explicit parameter instead of instance implicit. -/
protected instance Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isIntegral [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A] :
Algebra.IsIntegral K A := Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral.mp ‹_›
end Field
section
variable {K L R S A : Type*}
section Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Ring A]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
/-- If x is algebraic over R, then x is algebraic over S when S is an extension of R,
and the map from `R` to `S` is injective. -/
theorem IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective
(hinj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) {x : A}
(A_alg : IsAlgebraic R x) : IsAlgebraic S x :=
let ⟨p, hp₁, hp₂⟩ := A_alg
⟨p.map (algebraMap _ _), by
rwa [Ne, ← degree_eq_bot, degree_map_eq_of_injective hinj, degree_eq_bot], by simpa⟩
#align is_algebraic_of_larger_base_of_injective IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective
/-- If A is an algebraic algebra over R, then A is algebraic over S when S is an extension of R,
and the map from `R` to `S` is injective. -/
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective (hinj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S))
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic R A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic S A :=
⟨fun _ ↦ _root_.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective hinj (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic _)⟩
#align algebra.is_algebraic_of_larger_base_of_injective Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective
end CommRing
section Field
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Ring A]
variable [Algebra K L] [Algebra L A] [Algebra K A] [IsScalarTower K L A]
variable (L)
/-- If x is algebraic over K, then x is algebraic over L when L is an extension of K -/
theorem IsAlgebraic.tower_top {x : A} (A_alg : IsAlgebraic K x) :
IsAlgebraic L x :=
A_alg.tower_top_of_injective (algebraMap K L).injective
#align is_algebraic_of_larger_base IsAlgebraic.tower_top
/-- If A is an algebraic algebra over K, then A is algebraic over L when L is an extension of K -/
theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic L A :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top_of_injective (algebraMap K L).injective
#align algebra.is_algebraic_of_larger_base Algebra.IsAlgebraic.tower_top
variable (K)
theorem IsAlgebraic.of_finite (e : A) [FiniteDimensional K A] : IsAlgebraic K e :=
(IsIntegral.of_finite K e).isAlgebraic
variable (A)
/-- A field extension is algebraic if it is finite. -/
instance Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite [FiniteDimensional K A] : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A :=
(IsIntegral.of_finite K A).isAlgebraic
#align algebra.is_algebraic_of_finite Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite
end Field
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Ring A]
variable [Algebra K L] [Algebra L A] [Algebra K A] [IsScalarTower K L A]
/-- If L is an algebraic field extension of K and A is an algebraic algebra over L,
then A is algebraic over K. -/
protected theorem Algebra.IsAlgebraic.trans
[L_alg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] [A_alg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic L A] :
Algebra.IsAlgebraic K A := by
rw [Algebra.isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral] at L_alg A_alg ⊢
exact Algebra.IsIntegral.trans L
#align algebra.is_algebraic_trans Algebra.IsAlgebraic.trans
end CommRing
section NoZeroSMulDivisors
namespace Algebra.IsAlgebraic
variable [CommRing K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra K L] [NoZeroSMulDivisors K L]
theorem algHom_bijective [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] (f : L →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f := by
refine ⟨f.injective, fun b ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (R := K) b
let f' : p.rootSet L → p.rootSet L := (rootSet_maps_to' (fun x ↦ x) f).restrict f _ _
have : f'.Surjective := Finite.injective_iff_surjective.1
fun _ _ h ↦ Subtype.eq <| f.injective <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := this ⟨b, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨hp, he⟩⟩
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext_iff.1 ha⟩
#align algebra.is_algebraic.alg_hom_bijective Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algHom_bijective
theorem algHom_bijective₂ [Field R] [Algebra K R]
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] (f : L →ₐ[K] R) (g : R →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f ∧ Function.Bijective g :=
(g.injective.bijective₂_of_surjective f.injective (algHom_bijective <| g.comp f).2).symm
theorem bijective_of_isScalarTower [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L]
[Field R] [Algebra K R] [Algebra L R] [IsScalarTower K L R] (f : R →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(algHom_bijective₂ (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom K L R) f).2
theorem bijective_of_isScalarTower' [Field R] [Algebra K R]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors K R]
[Algebra.IsAlgebraic K R] [Algebra L R] [IsScalarTower K L R] (f : R →ₐ[K] L) :
Function.Bijective f :=
(algHom_bijective₂ f (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom K L R)).1
variable (K L)
/-- Bijection between algebra equivalences and algebra homomorphisms -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def algEquivEquivAlgHom [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K L] :
(L ≃ₐ[K] L) ≃* (L →ₐ[K] L) where
toFun ϕ := ϕ.toAlgHom
invFun ϕ := AlgEquiv.ofBijective ϕ (algHom_bijective ϕ)
left_inv _ := by ext; rfl
right_inv _ := by ext; rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align algebra.is_algebraic.alg_equiv_equiv_alg_hom Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom
end Algebra.IsAlgebraic
end NoZeroSMulDivisors
section Field
variable [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra K L]
theorem AlgHom.bijective [FiniteDimensional K L] (ϕ : L →ₐ[K] L) : Function.Bijective ϕ :=
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.of_finite K L).algHom_bijective ϕ
#align alg_hom.bijective AlgHom.bijective
variable (K L)
/-- Bijection between algebra equivalences and algebra homomorphisms -/
noncomputable abbrev algEquivEquivAlgHom [FiniteDimensional K L] :
(L ≃ₐ[K] L) ≃* (L →ₐ[K] L) :=
Algebra.IsAlgebraic.algEquivEquivAlgHom K L
#align alg_equiv_equiv_alg_hom algEquivEquivAlgHom
end Field
end
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [CommRing S]
theorem exists_integral_multiple [Algebra R S] {z : S} (hz : IsAlgebraic R z)
(inj : ∀ x, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) :
∃ᵉ (x : integralClosure R S) (y ≠ (0 : R)), z * algebraMap R S y = x := by
rcases hz with ⟨p, p_ne_zero, px⟩
set a := p.leadingCoeff
have a_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 := mt Polynomial.leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp p_ne_zero
have x_integral : IsIntegral R (z * algebraMap R S a) :=
⟨p.integralNormalization, monic_integralNormalization p_ne_zero,
integralNormalization_aeval_eq_zero px inj⟩
exact ⟨⟨_, x_integral⟩, a, a_ne_zero, rfl⟩
#align exists_integral_multiple exists_integral_multiple
/-- A fraction `(a : S) / (b : S)` can be reduced to `(c : S) / (d : R)`,
if `S` is the integral closure of `R` in an algebraic extension `L` of `R`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Algebraic.lean | 411 | 423 | theorem IsIntegralClosure.exists_smul_eq_mul {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra R S] [Algebra S L]
[Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R S L] [IsIntegralClosure S R L] [Algebra.IsAlgebraic R L]
(inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R L)) (a : S) {b : S} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
∃ᵉ (c : S) (d ≠ (0 : R)), d • a = b * c := by |
obtain ⟨c, d, d_ne, hx⟩ :=
exists_integral_multiple (Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (algebraMap _ L a / algebraMap _ L b))
((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp inj)
refine
⟨IsIntegralClosure.mk' S (c : L) c.2, d, d_ne, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_injective S R L ?_⟩
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, RingHom.map_mul, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_mk', ← hx, ←
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
rw [← mul_assoc _ (_ / _), mul_div_cancel₀ (algebraMap S L a), mul_comm]
exact mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mp (IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_injective S R L) _) hb
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iic Set.image_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioi Set.image_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iio Set.image_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Icc Set.image_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ico Set.image_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioc Set.image_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioo Set.image_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Bijections
-/
theorem Iic_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iic b) (Iic (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iic a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iic_add_bij Set.Iic_add_bij
theorem Iio_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iio b) (Iio (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iio a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iio_add_bij Set.Iio_add_bij
end OrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_add_Icc, min_sub_sub_right, max_sub_sub_right]
#align set.preimage_const_add_uIcc Set.preimage_const_add_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simpa only [add_comm] using preimage_const_add_uIcc a b c
#align set.preimage_add_const_uIcc Set.preimage_add_const_uIcc
-- TODO: Why is the notation `-[[a, b]]` broken?
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_uIcc : @Neg.neg (Set α) Set.neg [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_neg_Icc, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_neg_uIcc Set.preimage_neg_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc Set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
simp_rw [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_sub_Icc]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, min_add_add_left, max_add_add_left, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc Set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this module `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a + b, a + c]] := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_uIcc Set.image_const_add_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_uIcc Set.image_add_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_uIcc Set.image_const_sub_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
#align set.image_sub_const_uIcc Set.image_sub_const_uIcc
theorem image_neg_uIcc : Neg.neg '' [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by simp
#align set.image_neg_uIcc Set.image_neg_uIcc
variable {a b c d}
/-- If `[c, d]` is a subinterval of `[a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `d` is less than or
equal to that of `a` and `b` -/
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 565 | 568 | theorem abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc (h : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) : |d - c| ≤ |b - a| := by |
rw [← max_sub_min_eq_abs, ← max_sub_min_eq_abs]
rw [uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le] at h
exact sub_le_sub h.2 h.1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Variance
#align_import probability.moments from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"85453a2a14be8da64caf15ca50930cf4c6e5d8de"
/-!
# Moments and moment generating function
## Main definitions
* `ProbabilityTheory.moment X p μ`: `p`th moment of a real random variable `X` with respect to
measure `μ`, `μ[X^p]`
* `ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment X p μ`:`p`th central moment of `X` with respect to measure `μ`,
`μ[(X - μ[X])^p]`
* `ProbabilityTheory.mgf X μ t`: moment generating function of `X` with respect to measure `μ`,
`μ[exp(t*X)]`
* `ProbabilityTheory.cgf X μ t`: cumulant generating function, logarithm of the moment generating
function
## Main results
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.mgf_add`: if two real random variables `X` and `Y` are independent
and their mgfs are defined at `t`, then `mgf (X + Y) μ t = mgf X μ t * mgf Y μ t`
* `ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.cgf_add`: if two real random variables `X` and `Y` are independent
and their cgfs are defined at `t`, then `cgf (X + Y) μ t = cgf X μ t + cgf Y μ t`
* `ProbabilityTheory.measure_ge_le_exp_cgf` and `ProbabilityTheory.measure_le_le_exp_cgf`:
Chernoff bound on the upper (resp. lower) tail of a random variable. For `t` nonnegative such that
the cgf exists, `ℙ(ε ≤ X) ≤ exp(- t*ε + cgf X ℙ t)`. See also
`ProbabilityTheory.measure_ge_le_exp_mul_mgf` and
`ProbabilityTheory.measure_le_le_exp_mul_mgf` for versions of these results using `mgf` instead
of `cgf`.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Real
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {p : ℕ} {μ : Measure Ω}
/-- Moment of a real random variable, `μ[X ^ p]`. -/
def moment (X : Ω → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ :=
μ[X ^ p]
#align probability_theory.moment ProbabilityTheory.moment
/-- Central moment of a real random variable, `μ[(X - μ[X]) ^ p]`. -/
def centralMoment (X : Ω → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ := by
have m := fun (x : Ω) => μ[X] -- Porting note: Lean deems `μ[(X - fun x => μ[X]) ^ p]` ambiguous
exact μ[(X - m) ^ p]
#align probability_theory.central_moment ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment
@[simp]
theorem moment_zero (hp : p ≠ 0) : moment 0 p μ = 0 := by
simp only [moment, hp, zero_pow, Ne, not_false_iff, Pi.zero_apply, integral_const,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, integral_zero]
#align probability_theory.moment_zero ProbabilityTheory.moment_zero
@[simp]
theorem centralMoment_zero (hp : p ≠ 0) : centralMoment 0 p μ = 0 := by
simp only [centralMoment, hp, Pi.zero_apply, integral_const, smul_eq_mul,
mul_zero, zero_sub, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.neg_apply, neg_zero, zero_pow, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align probability_theory.central_moment_zero ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_zero
theorem centralMoment_one' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (h_int : Integrable X μ) :
centralMoment X 1 μ = (1 - (μ Set.univ).toReal) * μ[X] := by
simp only [centralMoment, Pi.sub_apply, pow_one]
rw [integral_sub h_int (integrable_const _)]
simp only [sub_mul, integral_const, smul_eq_mul, one_mul]
#align probability_theory.central_moment_one' ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_one'
@[simp]
theorem centralMoment_one [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : centralMoment X 1 μ = 0 := by
by_cases h_int : Integrable X μ
· rw [centralMoment_one' h_int]
simp only [measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, sub_self, zero_mul]
· simp only [centralMoment, Pi.sub_apply, pow_one]
have : ¬Integrable (fun x => X x - integral μ X) μ := by
refine fun h_sub => h_int ?_
have h_add : X = (fun x => X x - integral μ X) + fun _ => integral μ X := by ext1 x; simp
rw [h_add]
exact h_sub.add (integrable_const _)
rw [integral_undef this]
#align probability_theory.central_moment_one ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_one
theorem centralMoment_two_eq_variance [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : Memℒp X 2 μ) :
centralMoment X 2 μ = variance X μ := by rw [hX.variance_eq]; rfl
#align probability_theory.central_moment_two_eq_variance ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment_two_eq_variance
section MomentGeneratingFunction
variable {t : ℝ}
/-- Moment generating function of a real random variable `X`: `fun t => μ[exp(t*X)]`. -/
def mgf (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
μ[fun ω => exp (t * X ω)]
#align probability_theory.mgf ProbabilityTheory.mgf
/-- Cumulant generating function of a real random variable `X`: `fun t => log μ[exp(t*X)]`. -/
def cgf (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log (mgf X μ t)
#align probability_theory.cgf ProbabilityTheory.cgf
@[simp]
theorem mgf_zero_fun : mgf 0 μ t = (μ Set.univ).toReal := by
simp only [mgf, Pi.zero_apply, mul_zero, exp_zero, integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero_fun ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero_fun
@[simp]
theorem cgf_zero_fun : cgf 0 μ t = log (μ Set.univ).toReal := by simp only [cgf, mgf_zero_fun]
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero_fun ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero_fun
@[simp]
theorem mgf_zero_measure : mgf X (0 : Measure Ω) t = 0 := by simp only [mgf, integral_zero_measure]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero_measure ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem cgf_zero_measure : cgf X (0 : Measure Ω) t = 0 := by
simp only [cgf, log_zero, mgf_zero_measure]
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero_measure ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem mgf_const' (c : ℝ) : mgf (fun _ => c) μ t = (μ Set.univ).toReal * exp (t * c) := by
simp only [mgf, integral_const, smul_eq_mul]
#align probability_theory.mgf_const' ProbabilityTheory.mgf_const'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: `simp only` already proves this
theorem mgf_const (c : ℝ) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : mgf (fun _ => c) μ t = exp (t * c) := by
simp only [mgf_const', measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, one_mul]
#align probability_theory.mgf_const ProbabilityTheory.mgf_const
@[simp]
theorem cgf_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
cgf (fun _ => c) μ t = log (μ Set.univ).toReal + t * c := by
simp only [cgf, mgf_const']
rw [log_mul _ (exp_pos _).ne']
· rw [log_exp _]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero]
simp only [hμ, measure_ne_top μ Set.univ, or_self_iff, not_false_iff]
#align probability_theory.cgf_const' ProbabilityTheory.cgf_const'
@[simp]
theorem cgf_const [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (c : ℝ) : cgf (fun _ => c) μ t = t * c := by
simp only [cgf, mgf_const, log_exp]
#align probability_theory.cgf_const ProbabilityTheory.cgf_const
@[simp]
theorem mgf_zero' : mgf X μ 0 = (μ Set.univ).toReal := by
simp only [mgf, zero_mul, exp_zero, integral_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero' ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: `simp only` already proves this
theorem mgf_zero [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : mgf X μ 0 = 1 := by
simp only [mgf_zero', measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal]
#align probability_theory.mgf_zero ProbabilityTheory.mgf_zero
@[simp]
theorem cgf_zero' : cgf X μ 0 = log (μ Set.univ).toReal := by simp only [cgf, mgf_zero']
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero' ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero'
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: `simp only` already proves this
theorem cgf_zero [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] : cgf X μ 0 = 0 := by
simp only [cgf_zero', measure_univ, ENNReal.one_toReal, log_one]
#align probability_theory.cgf_zero ProbabilityTheory.cgf_zero
theorem mgf_undef (hX : ¬Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) : mgf X μ t = 0 := by
simp only [mgf, integral_undef hX]
#align probability_theory.mgf_undef ProbabilityTheory.mgf_undef
theorem cgf_undef (hX : ¬Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) : cgf X μ t = 0 := by
simp only [cgf, mgf_undef hX, log_zero]
#align probability_theory.cgf_undef ProbabilityTheory.cgf_undef
theorem mgf_nonneg : 0 ≤ mgf X μ t := by
unfold mgf; positivity
#align probability_theory.mgf_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.mgf_nonneg
theorem mgf_pos' (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (h_int_X : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) :
0 < mgf X μ t := by
simp_rw [mgf]
have : ∫ x : Ω, exp (t * X x) ∂μ = ∫ x : Ω in Set.univ, exp (t * X x) ∂μ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_univ]
rw [this, setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae _ _]
· have h_eq_univ : (Function.support fun x : Ω => exp (t * X x)) = Set.univ := by
ext1 x
simp only [Function.mem_support, Set.mem_univ, iff_true_iff]
exact (exp_pos _).ne'
rw [h_eq_univ, Set.inter_univ _]
refine Ne.bot_lt ?_
simp only [hμ, ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, Ne, Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, not_false_iff]
· filter_upwards with x
rw [Pi.zero_apply]
exact (exp_pos _).le
· rwa [integrableOn_univ]
#align probability_theory.mgf_pos' ProbabilityTheory.mgf_pos'
theorem mgf_pos [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (h_int_X : Integrable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ) :
0 < mgf X μ t :=
mgf_pos' (IsProbabilityMeasure.ne_zero μ) h_int_X
#align probability_theory.mgf_pos ProbabilityTheory.mgf_pos
theorem mgf_neg : mgf (-X) μ t = mgf X μ (-t) := by simp_rw [mgf, Pi.neg_apply, mul_neg, neg_mul]
#align probability_theory.mgf_neg ProbabilityTheory.mgf_neg
theorem cgf_neg : cgf (-X) μ t = cgf X μ (-t) := by simp_rw [cgf, mgf_neg]
#align probability_theory.cgf_neg ProbabilityTheory.cgf_neg
/-- This is a trivial application of `IndepFun.comp` but it will come up frequently. -/
theorem IndepFun.exp_mul {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ) (s t : ℝ) :
IndepFun (fun ω => exp (s * X ω)) (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ := by
have h_meas : ∀ t, Measurable fun x => exp (t * x) := fun t => (measurable_id'.const_mul t).exp
change IndepFun ((fun x => exp (s * x)) ∘ X) ((fun x => exp (t * x)) ∘ Y) μ
exact IndepFun.comp h_indep (h_meas s) (h_meas t)
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.exp_mul ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.exp_mul
theorem IndepFun.mgf_add {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ)
(hX : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ)
(hY : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ) :
mgf (X + Y) μ t = mgf X μ t * mgf Y μ t := by
simp_rw [mgf, Pi.add_apply, mul_add, exp_add]
exact (h_indep.exp_mul t t).integral_mul hX hY
#align probability_theory.indep_fun.mgf_add ProbabilityTheory.IndepFun.mgf_add
| Mathlib/Probability/Moments.lean | 232 | 239 | theorem IndepFun.mgf_add' {X Y : Ω → ℝ} (h_indep : IndepFun X Y μ) (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ)
(hY : AEStronglyMeasurable Y μ) : mgf (X + Y) μ t = mgf X μ t * mgf Y μ t := by |
have A : Continuous fun x : ℝ => exp (t * x) := by fun_prop
have h'X : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * X ω)) μ :=
A.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable hX.aemeasurable
have h'Y : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun ω => exp (t * Y ω)) μ :=
A.aestronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable hY.aemeasurable
exact h_indep.mgf_add h'X h'Y
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.PiAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import ring_theory.power_series.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2d5739b61641ee4e7e53eca5688a08f66f2e6a60"
/-!
# Formal (multivariate) power series
This file defines multivariate formal power series
and develops the basic properties of these objects.
A formal power series is to a polynomial like an infinite sum is to a finite sum.
We provide the natural inclusion from multivariate polynomials to multivariate formal power series.
## Note
This file sets up the (semi)ring structure on multivariate power series:
additional results are in:
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Inverse` : invertibility,
formal power series over a local ring form a local ring;
* `Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPowerSeries.Trunc`: truncation of power series.
In `Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic`, formal power series in one variable
will be obtained as a particular case, defined by
`PowerSeries R := MvPowerSeries Unit R`.
See that file for a specific description.
## Implementation notes
In this file we define multivariate formal power series with
variables indexed by `σ` and coefficients in `R` as
`MvPowerSeries σ R := (σ →₀ ℕ) → R`.
Unfortunately there is not yet enough API to show that they are the completion
of the ring of multivariate polynomials. However, we provide most of the infrastructure
that is needed to do this. Once I-adic completion (topological or algebraic) is available
it should not be hard to fill in the details.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
/-- Multivariate formal power series, where `σ` is the index set of the variables
and `R` is the coefficient ring. -/
def MvPowerSeries (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) :=
(σ →₀ ℕ) → R
#align mv_power_series MvPowerSeries
namespace MvPowerSeries
open Finsupp
variable {σ R : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.instZero
instance [AddMonoid R] : AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addMonoid
instance [AddGroup R] : AddGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addGroup
instance [AddCommMonoid R] : AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommMonoid
instance [AddCommGroup R] : AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Pi.addCommGroup
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
Function.nontrivial
instance {A} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] : Module R (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.module _ _ _
instance {A S} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A] [SMul R S]
[IsScalarTower R S A] : IsScalarTower R S (MvPowerSeries σ A) :=
Pi.isScalarTower
section Semiring
variable (R) [Semiring R]
/-- The `n`th monomial as multivariate formal power series:
it is defined as the `R`-linear map from `R` to the semi-ring
of multivariate formal power series associating to each `a`
the map sending `n : σ →₀ ℕ` to the value `a`
and sending all other `x : σ →₀ ℕ` different from `n` to `0`. -/
def monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPowerSeries σ R :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n
#align mv_power_series.monomial MvPowerSeries.monomial
/-- The `n`th coefficient of a multivariate formal power series. -/
def coeff (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPowerSeries σ R →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.proj n
#align mv_power_series.coeff MvPowerSeries.coeff
variable {R}
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal if all their coefficients are equal. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ ψ} (h : ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ) : φ = ψ :=
funext h
#align mv_power_series.ext MvPowerSeries.ext
/-- Two multivariate formal power series are equal
if and only if all their coefficients are equal. -/
theorem ext_iff {φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R} : φ = ψ ↔ ∀ n : σ →₀ ℕ, coeff R n φ = coeff R n ψ :=
Function.funext_iff
#align mv_power_series.ext_iff MvPowerSeries.ext_iff
theorem monomial_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial R n) = LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ ↦ R) n := by
rw [monomial]
-- unify the `Decidable` arguments
convert rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_def MvPowerSeries.monomial_def
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a) = if m = n then a else 0 := by
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [coeff, monomial_def, LinearMap.proj_apply (i := m)]
dsimp only
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [LinearMap.stdBasis_apply, Function.update_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_same (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : coeff R n (monomial R n a) = a := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_same R (fun _ ↦ R) n a
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_same MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_same
theorem coeff_monomial_ne {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} (h : m ≠ n) (a : R) : coeff R m (monomial R n a) = 0 := by
classical
rw [monomial_def]
exact LinearMap.stdBasis_ne R (fun _ ↦ R) _ _ h a
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_ne MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_ne
theorem eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero {m n : σ →₀ ℕ} {a : R} (h : coeff R m (monomial R n a) ≠ 0) :
m = n :=
by_contra fun h' => h <| coeff_monomial_ne h' a
#align mv_power_series.eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero MvPowerSeries.eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_comp_monomial (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : (coeff R n).comp (monomial R n) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| coeff_monomial_same n
#align mv_power_series.coeff_comp_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_comp_monomial
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this.
-- @[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (n : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff R n (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero
variable (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ ψ : MvPowerSeries σ R)
instance : One (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
⟨monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1⟩
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] : coeff R n (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
#align mv_power_series.coeff_one MvPowerSeries.coeff_one
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 1
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_one MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_one
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.monomial_zero_one MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_one
instance : AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show AddMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
natCast := fun n => monomial R 0 n
natCast_zero := by simp [Nat.cast]
natCast_succ := by simp [Nat.cast, monomial_zero_one]
one := 1 }
instance : Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
⟨fun φ ψ n => ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ⟩
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] :
coeff R n (φ * ψ) = ∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff R p.1 φ * coeff R p.2 ψ := by
refine Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun _ _ => rfl
rw [Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq σ) ‹DecidableEq σ›]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul
protected theorem zero_mul : (0 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
#align mv_power_series.zero_mul MvPowerSeries.zero_mul
protected theorem mul_zero : φ * 0 = 0 :=
ext fun n => by classical simp [coeff_mul]
#align mv_power_series.mul_zero MvPowerSeries.mul_zero
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R m (monomial R n a * φ) = if n ≤ m then a * coeff R (m - n) φ else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 (monomial R n a) * coeff R p.2 φ ≠ 0 → p.1 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (left_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_fst_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_monomial_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_monomial_mul
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R m (φ * monomial R n a) = if n ≤ m then coeff R (m - n) φ * a else 0 := by
classical
have :
∀ p ∈ antidiagonal m,
coeff R (p : (σ →₀ ℕ) × (σ →₀ ℕ)).1 φ * coeff R p.2 (monomial R n a) ≠ 0 → p.2 = n :=
fun p _ hp => eq_of_coeff_monomial_ne_zero (right_ne_zero_of_mul hp)
rw [coeff_mul, ← Finset.sum_filter_of_ne this, Finset.filter_snd_eq_antidiagonal _ n,
Finset.sum_ite_index]
simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, coeff_monomial_same, Finset.sum_empty]
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_monomial
theorem coeff_add_monomial_mul (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (monomial R m a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by
rw [coeff_monomial_mul, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_left]
exact le_add_right le_rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_add_monomial_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_add_monomial_mul
theorem coeff_add_mul_monomial (a : R) :
coeff R (m + n) (φ * monomial R n a) = coeff R m φ * a := by
rw [coeff_mul_monomial, if_pos, add_tsub_cancel_right]
exact le_add_left le_rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_add_mul_monomial MvPowerSeries.coeff_add_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem commute_monomial {a : R} {n} :
Commute φ (monomial R n a) ↔ ∀ m, Commute (coeff R m φ) a := by
refine ext_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· have := h (m + n)
rwa [coeff_add_mul_monomial, add_comm, coeff_add_monomial_mul] at this
· rw [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial_mul]
split_ifs <;> [apply h; rfl]
#align mv_power_series.commute_monomial MvPowerSeries.commute_monomial
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : MvPowerSeries σ R) * φ = φ :=
ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ 1
#align mv_power_series.one_mul MvPowerSeries.one_mul
protected theorem mul_one : φ * 1 = φ :=
ext fun n => by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ 1
#align mv_power_series.mul_one MvPowerSeries.mul_one
protected theorem mul_add (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : φ₁ * (φ₂ + φ₃) = φ₁ * φ₂ + φ₁ * φ₃ :=
ext fun n => by
classical simp only [coeff_mul, mul_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib, LinearMap.map_add]
#align mv_power_series.mul_add MvPowerSeries.mul_add
protected theorem add_mul (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : (φ₁ + φ₂) * φ₃ = φ₁ * φ₃ + φ₂ * φ₃ :=
ext fun n => by
classical simp only [coeff_mul, add_mul, Finset.sum_add_distrib, LinearMap.map_add]
#align mv_power_series.add_mul MvPowerSeries.add_mul
protected theorem mul_assoc (φ₁ φ₂ φ₃ : MvPowerSeries σ R) : φ₁ * φ₂ * φ₃ = φ₁ * (φ₂ * φ₃) := by
ext1 n
classical
simp only [coeff_mul, Finset.sum_mul, Finset.mul_sum, Finset.sum_sigma']
apply Finset.sum_nbij' (fun ⟨⟨_i, j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(k, l + j), (l, j)⟩)
(fun ⟨⟨i, _j⟩, ⟨k, l⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨(i + k, l), (i, k)⟩) <;> aesop (add simp [add_assoc, mul_assoc])
#align mv_power_series.mul_assoc MvPowerSeries.mul_assoc
instance : Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddMonoidWithOne (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (Mul (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with
mul_one := MvPowerSeries.mul_one
one_mul := MvPowerSeries.one_mul
mul_assoc := MvPowerSeries.mul_assoc
mul_zero := MvPowerSeries.mul_zero
zero_mul := MvPowerSeries.zero_mul
left_distrib := MvPowerSeries.mul_add
right_distrib := MvPowerSeries.add_mul }
end Semiring
instance [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ show Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R) by infer_instance with
mul_comm := fun φ ψ =>
ext fun n => by
classical
simpa only [coeff_mul, mul_comm] using
sum_antidiagonal_swap n fun a b => coeff R a φ * coeff R b ψ }
instance [Ring R] : Ring (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Semiring (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with }
instance [CommRing R] : CommRing (MvPowerSeries σ R) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring (MvPowerSeries σ R)),
inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (MvPowerSeries σ R)) with }
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (m n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a b : R) :
monomial R m a * monomial R n b = monomial R (m + n) (a * b) := by
classical
ext k
simp only [coeff_mul_monomial, coeff_monomial]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₃ h₂ <;> try rfl
· rw [← h₂, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h₁] at h₃
exact (h₃ rfl).elim
· rw [h₃, add_tsub_cancel_right] at h₂
exact (h₂ rfl).elim
· exact zero_mul b
· rw [h₂] at h₁
exact (h₁ <| le_add_left le_rfl).elim
#align mv_power_series.monomial_mul_monomial MvPowerSeries.monomial_mul_monomial
variable (σ) (R)
/-- The constant multivariate formal power series. -/
def C : R →+* MvPowerSeries σ R :=
{ monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) with
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun a b => (monomial_mul_monomial 0 0 a b).symm
map_zero' := (monomial R (0 : _)).map_zero }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.C MvPowerSeries.C
variable {σ} {R}
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C : ⇑(monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = C σ R :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.monomial_zero_eq_C MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C
theorem monomial_zero_eq_C_apply (a : R) : monomial R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) a = C σ R a :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.monomial_zero_eq_C_apply MvPowerSeries.monomial_zero_eq_C_apply
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a) = if n = 0 then a else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_C MvPowerSeries.coeff_C
theorem coeff_zero_C (a : R) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (C σ R a) = a :=
coeff_monomial_same 0 a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_C MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_C
/-- The variables of the multivariate formal power series ring. -/
def X (s : σ) : MvPowerSeries σ R :=
monomial R (single s 1) 1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.X MvPowerSeries.X
theorem coeff_X [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) :
coeff R n (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if n = single s 1 then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_monomial _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_X MvPowerSeries.coeff_X
theorem coeff_index_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s t : σ) :
coeff R (single t 1) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = if t = s then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X, single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : ℕ) ≠ 0)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_index_single_X MvPowerSeries.coeff_index_single_X
@[simp]
theorem coeff_index_single_self_X (s : σ) : coeff R (single s 1) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_monomial_same _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_index_single_self_X MvPowerSeries.coeff_index_single_self_X
theorem coeff_zero_X (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) = 0 := by
classical
rw [coeff_X, if_neg]
intro h
exact one_ne_zero (single_eq_zero.mp h.symm)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_X MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X
theorem commute_X (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : Commute φ (X s) :=
φ.commute_monomial.mpr fun _m => Commute.one_right _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.commute_X MvPowerSeries.commute_X
theorem X_def (s : σ) : X s = monomial R (single s 1) 1 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.X_def MvPowerSeries.X_def
theorem X_pow_eq (s : σ) (n : ℕ) : (X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n = monomial R (single s n) 1 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [pow_succ, ih, Finsupp.single_add, X, monomial_mul_monomial, one_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.X_pow_eq MvPowerSeries.X_pow_eq
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R m ((X s : MvPowerSeries σ R) ^ n) = if m = single s n then 1 else 0 := by
rw [X_pow_eq s n, coeff_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_X_pow MvPowerSeries.coeff_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (φ * C σ R a) = coeff R n φ * a := by simpa using coeff_add_mul_monomial n 0 φ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_mul_C MvPowerSeries.coeff_mul_C
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (n : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) :
coeff R n (C σ R a * φ) = a * coeff R n φ := by simpa using coeff_add_monomial_mul 0 n φ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_C_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_C_mul
theorem coeff_zero_mul_X (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (φ * X s) = 0 := by
have : ¬single s 1 ≤ 0 := fun h => by simpa using h s
simp only [X, coeff_mul_monomial, if_neg this]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_mul_X MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_mul_X
theorem coeff_zero_X_mul (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (s : σ) : coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) (X s * φ) = 0 := by
rw [← (φ.commute_X s).eq, coeff_zero_mul_X]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_X_mul MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_X_mul
variable (σ) (R)
/-- The constant coefficient of a formal power series. -/
def constantCoeff : MvPowerSeries σ R →+* R :=
{ coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) with
toFun := coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)
map_one' := coeff_zero_one
map_mul' := fun φ ψ => by classical simp [coeff_mul, support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := LinearMap.map_zero _ }
#align mv_power_series.constant_coeff MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff
variable {σ} {R}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff : ⇑(coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ)) = constantCoeff σ R :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff
theorem coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) :
coeff R (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) φ = constantCoeff σ R φ :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_zero_eq_constant_coeff_apply MvPowerSeries.coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff_apply
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (a : R) : constantCoeff σ R (C σ R a) = a :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.constant_coeff_C MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_C
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : (constantCoeff σ R).comp (C σ R) = RingHom.id R :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.constant_coeff_comp_C MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_comp_C
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this.
-- @[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_zero : constantCoeff σ R 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.constant_coeff_zero MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this.
-- @[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_one : constantCoeff σ R 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.constant_coeff_one MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_one
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (s : σ) : constantCoeff σ R (X s) = 0 :=
coeff_zero_X s
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_power_series.constant_coeff_X MvPowerSeries.constantCoeff_X
/-- If a multivariate formal power series is invertible,
then so is its constant coefficient. -/
theorem isUnit_constantCoeff (φ : MvPowerSeries σ R) (h : IsUnit φ) :
IsUnit (constantCoeff σ R φ) :=
h.map _
#align mv_power_series.is_unit_constant_coeff MvPowerSeries.isUnit_constantCoeff
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this.
-- @[simp]
theorem coeff_smul (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (n) (a : R) : coeff _ n (a • f) = a * coeff _ n f :=
rfl
#align mv_power_series.coeff_smul MvPowerSeries.coeff_smul
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/Basic.lean | 514 | 516 | theorem smul_eq_C_mul (f : MvPowerSeries σ R) (a : R) : a • f = C σ R a * f := by |
ext
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.ModuleCat.Free
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.CofilteredLimit
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.Profinite.Product
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyConstant.Algebra
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
/-!
# Nöbeling's theorem
This file proves Nöbeling's theorem.
## Main result
* `LocallyConstant.freeOfProfinite`: Nöbeling's theorem.
For `S : Profinite`, the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant S ℤ` is free.
## Proof idea
We follow the proof of theorem 5.4 in [scholze2019condensed], in which the idea is to embed `S` in
a product of `I` copies of `Bool` for some sufficiently large `I`, and then to choose a
well-ordering on `I` and use ordinal induction over that well-order. Here we can let `I` be
the set of clopen subsets of `S` since `S` is totally separated.
The above means it suffices to prove the following statement: For a closed subset `C` of `I → Bool`,
the `ℤ`-module `LocallyConstant C ℤ` is free.
For `i : I`, let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map `fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
The basis will consist of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be written
as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. We call this set `GoodProducts C`
What is proved by ordinal induction is that this set is linearly independent. The fact that it
spans can be proved directly.
## References
- [scholze2019condensed], Theorem 5.4.
-/
universe u
namespace Profinite
namespace NobelingProof
variable {I : Type u} [LinearOrder I] [IsWellOrder I (·<·)] (C : Set (I → Bool))
open Profinite ContinuousMap CategoryTheory Limits Opposite Submodule
section Projections
/-!
## Projection maps
The purpose of this section is twofold.
Firstly, in the proof that the set `GoodProducts C` spans the whole module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`,
we need to project `C` down to finite discrete subsets and write `C` as a cofiltered limit of those.
Secondly, in the inductive argument, we need to project `C` down to "smaller" sets satisfying the
inductive hypothesis.
In this section we define the relevant projection maps and prove some compatibility results.
### Main definitions
* Let `J : I → Prop`. Then `Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)` is the projection mapping everything
that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`.
* The image of `C` under `Proj J` is denoted `π C J` and the corresponding map `C → π C J` is called
`ProjRestrict`. If `J` implies `K` we have a map `ProjRestricts : π C K → π C J`.
* `spanCone_isLimit` establishes that when `C` is compact, it can be written as a limit of its
images under the maps `Proj (· ∈ s)` where `s : Finset I`.
-/
variable (J K L : I → Prop) [∀ i, Decidable (J i)] [∀ i, Decidable (K i)] [∀ i, Decidable (L i)]
/--
The projection mapping everything that satisfies `J i` to itself, and everything else to `false`
-/
def Proj : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool) :=
fun c i ↦ if J i then c i else false
@[simp]
theorem continuous_proj :
Continuous (Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
dsimp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Proj]
apply continuous_pi
intro i
split
· apply continuous_apply
· apply continuous_const
/-- The image of `Proj π J` -/
def π : Set (I → Bool) := (Proj J) '' C
/-- The restriction of `Proj π J` to a subset, mapping to its image. -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestrict : C → π C J :=
Set.MapsTo.restrict (Proj J) _ _ (Set.mapsTo_image _ _)
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestrict : Continuous (ProjRestrict C J) :=
Continuous.restrict _ (continuous_proj _)
theorem proj_eq_self {x : I → Bool} (h : ∀ i, x i ≠ false → J i) : Proj J x = x := by
ext i
simp only [Proj, ite_eq_left_iff]
contrapose!
simpa only [ne_comm] using h i
theorem proj_prop_eq_self (hh : ∀ i x, x ∈ C → x i ≠ false → J i) : π C J = C := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, h⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨x, h, ?_⟩⟩
· rwa [← h, proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · y hy)
· rw [proj_eq_self]; exact (hh · x h)
theorem proj_comp_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : (Proj J ∘ Proj K) =
(Proj J : (I → Bool) → (I → Bool)) := by
ext x i; dsimp [Proj]; aesop
theorem proj_eq_of_subset (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : π (π C K) J = π C J := by
ext x
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨y, ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨z, hz, (?_ : _ = (Proj J ∘ Proj K) z)⟩
rw [proj_comp_of_subset J K h]
· obtain ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ := h
dsimp [π]
rw [← Set.image_comp]
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
rw [proj_comp_of_subset J K h]
variable {J K L}
/-- A variant of `ProjRestrict` with domain of the form `π C K` -/
@[simps!]
def ProjRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : π C K → π C J :=
Homeomorph.setCongr (proj_eq_of_subset C J K h) ∘ ProjRestrict (π C K) J
@[simp]
theorem continuous_projRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : Continuous (ProjRestricts C h) :=
Continuous.comp (Homeomorph.continuous _) (continuous_projRestrict _ _)
theorem surjective_projRestricts (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) : Function.Surjective (ProjRestricts C h) :=
(Homeomorph.surjective _).comp (Set.surjective_mapsTo_image_restrict _ _)
variable (J) in
theorem projRestricts_eq_id : ProjRestricts C (fun i (h : J i) ↦ h) = id := by
ext ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩ i
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [π, Proj, ProjRestricts_coe, id_eq, if_true]
theorem projRestricts_eq_comp (hJK : ∀ i, J i → K i) (hKL : ∀ i, K i → L i) :
ProjRestricts C hJK ∘ ProjRestricts C hKL = ProjRestricts C (fun i ↦ hKL i ∘ hJK i) := by
ext x i
simp only [π, Proj, Function.comp_apply, ProjRestricts_coe]
aesop
theorem projRestricts_comp_projRestrict (h : ∀ i, J i → K i) :
ProjRestricts C h ∘ ProjRestrict C K = ProjRestrict C J := by
ext x i
simp only [π, Proj, Function.comp_apply, ProjRestricts_coe, ProjRestrict_coe]
aesop
variable (J)
/-- The objectwise map in the isomorphism `spanFunctor ≅ Profinite.indexFunctor`. -/
def iso_map : C(π C J, (IndexFunctor.obj C J)) :=
⟨fun x ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ x.val i.val, by
rcases x with ⟨x, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, ?_⟩
ext ⟨i, hi⟩
simp [precomp, Proj, hi]⟩, by
refine Continuous.subtype_mk (continuous_pi fun i ↦ ?_) _
exact (continuous_apply i.val).comp continuous_subtype_val⟩
lemma iso_map_bijective : Function.Bijective (iso_map C J) := by
refine ⟨fun a b h ↦ ?_, fun a ↦ ?_⟩
· ext i
rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h
by_cases hi : J i
· exact congr_fun h ⟨i, hi⟩
· rcases a with ⟨_, c, hc, rfl⟩
rcases b with ⟨_, d, hd, rfl⟩
simp only [Proj, if_neg hi]
· refine ⟨⟨fun i ↦ if hi : J i then a.val ⟨i, hi⟩ else false, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rcases a with ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
· ext i
exact dif_pos i.prop
variable {C} (hC : IsCompact C)
/--
For a given compact subset `C` of `I → Bool`, `spanFunctor` is the functor from the poset of finsets
of `I` to `Profinite`, sending a finite subset set `J` to the image of `C` under the projection
`Proj J`.
-/
noncomputable
def spanFunctor [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
(Finset I)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Profinite.{u} where
obj s := @Profinite.of (π C (· ∈ (unop s))) _
(by rw [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]; exact hC.image (continuous_proj _)) _ _
map h := ⟨(ProjRestricts C (leOfHom h.unop)), continuous_projRestricts _ _⟩
map_id J := by simp only [projRestricts_eq_id C (· ∈ (unop J))]; rfl
map_comp _ _ := by dsimp; congr; dsimp; rw [projRestricts_eq_comp]
/-- The limit cone on `spanFunctor` with point `C`. -/
noncomputable
def spanCone [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] : Cone (spanFunctor hC) where
pt := @Profinite.of C _ (by rwa [← isCompact_iff_compactSpace]) _ _
π :=
{ app := fun s ↦ ⟨ProjRestrict C (· ∈ unop s), continuous_projRestrict _ _⟩
naturality := by
intro X Y h
simp only [Functor.const_obj_obj, Homeomorph.setCongr, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe,
Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, ← projRestricts_comp_projRestrict C
(leOfHom h.unop)]
rfl }
/-- `spanCone` is a limit cone. -/
noncomputable
def spanCone_isLimit [∀ (s : Finset I) (i : I), Decidable (i ∈ s)] :
CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit (spanCone hC) := by
refine (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (NatIso.ofComponents
(fun s ↦ (Profinite.isoOfBijective _ (iso_map_bijective C (· ∈ unop s)))) ?_) (spanCone hC))
(IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (indexCone_isLimit hC) (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) ?_))
· intro ⟨s⟩ ⟨t⟩ ⟨⟨⟨f⟩⟩⟩
ext x
have : iso_map C (· ∈ t) ∘ ProjRestricts C f = IndexFunctor.map C f ∘ iso_map C (· ∈ s) := by
ext _ i; exact dif_pos i.prop
exact congr_fun this x
· intro ⟨s⟩
ext x
have : iso_map C (· ∈ s) ∘ ProjRestrict C (· ∈ s) = IndexFunctor.π_app C (· ∈ s) := by
ext _ i; exact dif_pos i.prop
erw [← this]
rfl
end Projections
section Products
/-!
## Defining the basis
Our proposed basis consists of products `e C iᵣ * ⋯ * e C i₁` with `iᵣ > ⋯ > i₁` which cannot be
written as linear combinations of lexicographically smaller products. See below for the definition
of `e`.
### Main definitions
* For `i : I`, we let `e C i : LocallyConstant C ℤ` denote the map
`fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)`.
* `Products I` is the type of lists of decreasing elements of `I`, so a typical element is
`[i₁, i₂,..., iᵣ]` with `i₁ > i₂ > ... > iᵣ`.
* `Products.eval C` is the `C`-evaluation of a list. It takes a term `[i₁, i₂,..., iᵣ] : Products I`
and returns the actual product `e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : LocallyConstant C ℤ`.
* `GoodProducts C` is the set of `Products I` such that their `C`-evaluation cannot be written as
a linear combination of evaluations of lexicographically smaller lists.
### Main results
* `Products.evalFacProp` and `Products.evalFacProps` establish the fact that `Products.eval`
interacts nicely with the projection maps from the previous section.
* `GoodProducts.span_iff_products`: the good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` iff all the
products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ`.
-/
/--
`e C i` is the locally constant map from `C : Set (I → Bool)` to `ℤ` sending `f` to 1 if
`f.val i = true`, and 0 otherwise.
-/
def e (i : I) : LocallyConstant C ℤ where
toFun := fun f ↦ (if f.val i then 1 else 0)
isLocallyConstant := by
rw [IsLocallyConstant.iff_continuous]
exact (continuous_of_discreteTopology (f := fun (a : Bool) ↦ (if a then (1 : ℤ) else 0))).comp
((continuous_apply i).comp continuous_subtype_val)
/--
`Products I` is the type of lists of decreasing elements of `I`, so a typical element is
`[i₁, i₂, ...]` with `i₁ > i₂ > ...`. We order `Products I` lexicographically, so `[] < [i₁, ...]`,
and `[i₁, i₂, ...] < [j₁, j₂, ...]` if either `i₁ < j₁`, or `i₁ = j₁` and `[i₂, ...] < [j₂, ...]`.
Terms `m = [i₁, i₂, ..., iᵣ]` of this type will be used to represent products of the form
`e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : LocallyConstant C ℤ` . The function associated to `m` is `m.eval`.
-/
def Products (I : Type*) [LinearOrder I] := {l : List I // l.Chain' (·>·)}
namespace Products
instance : LinearOrder (Products I) :=
inferInstanceAs (LinearOrder {l : List I // l.Chain' (·>·)})
@[simp]
theorem lt_iff_lex_lt (l m : Products I) : l < m ↔ List.Lex (·<·) l.val m.val := by
cases l; cases m; rw [Subtype.mk_lt_mk]; exact Iff.rfl
instance : IsWellFounded (Products I) (·<·) := by
have : (· < · : Products I → _ → _) = (fun l m ↦ List.Lex (·<·) l.val m.val) := by
ext; exact lt_iff_lex_lt _ _
rw [this]
dsimp [Products]
rw [(by rfl : (·>· : I → _) = flip (·<·))]
infer_instance
/-- The evaluation `e C i₁ ··· e C iᵣ : C → ℤ` of a formal product `[i₁, i₂, ..., iᵣ]`. -/
def eval (l : Products I) := (l.1.map (e C)).prod
/--
The predicate on products which we prove picks out a basis of `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. We call such a
product "good".
-/
def isGood (l : Products I) : Prop :=
l.eval C ∉ Submodule.span ℤ ((Products.eval C) '' {m | m < l})
theorem rel_head!_of_mem [Inhabited I] {i : I} {l : Products I} (hi : i ∈ l.val) :
i ≤ l.val.head! :=
List.Sorted.le_head! (List.chain'_iff_pairwise.mp l.prop) hi
theorem head!_le_of_lt [Inhabited I] {q l : Products I} (h : q < l) (hq : q.val ≠ []) :
q.val.head! ≤ l.val.head! :=
List.head!_le_of_lt l.val q.val h hq
end Products
/-- The set of good products. -/
def GoodProducts := {l : Products I | l.isGood C}
namespace GoodProducts
/-- Evaluation of good products. -/
def eval (l : {l : Products I // l.isGood C}) : LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
Products.eval C l.1
theorem injective : Function.Injective (eval C) := by
intro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ h
dsimp [eval] at h
rcases lt_trichotomy a b with (h'|rfl|h')
· exfalso; apply hb; rw [← h]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨a, h', rfl⟩
· rfl
· exfalso; apply ha; rw [h]
exact Submodule.subset_span ⟨b, ⟨h',rfl⟩⟩
/-- The image of the good products in the module `LocallyConstant C ℤ`. -/
def range := Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C)
/-- The type of good products is equivalent to its image. -/
noncomputable
def equiv_range : GoodProducts C ≃ range C :=
Equiv.ofInjective (eval C) (injective C)
theorem equiv_toFun_eq_eval : (equiv_range C).toFun = Set.rangeFactorization (eval C) := rfl
theorem linearIndependent_iff_range : LinearIndependent ℤ (GoodProducts.eval C) ↔
LinearIndependent ℤ (fun (p : range C) ↦ p.1) := by
rw [← @Set.rangeFactorization_eq _ _ (GoodProducts.eval C), ← equiv_toFun_eq_eval C]
exact linearIndependent_equiv (equiv_range C)
end GoodProducts
namespace Products
theorem eval_eq (l : Products I) (x : C) :
l.eval C x = if ∀ i, i ∈ l.val → (x.val i = true) then 1 else 0 := by
change LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x (l.eval C) = _
rw [eval, map_list_prod]
split_ifs with h
· simp only [List.map_map]
apply List.prod_eq_one
simp only [List.mem_map, Function.comp_apply]
rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact if_pos (h i hi)
· simp only [List.map_map, List.prod_eq_zero_iff, List.mem_map, Function.comp_apply]
push_neg at h
convert h with i
dsimp [LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom, e]
simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, one_ne_zero]
theorem evalFacProp {l : Products I} (J : I → Prop)
(h : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)] :
l.eval (π C J) ∘ ProjRestrict C J = l.eval C := by
ext x
dsimp [ProjRestrict]
rw [Products.eval_eq, Products.eval_eq]
congr
apply forall_congr; intro i
apply forall_congr; intro hi
simp [h i hi, Proj]
theorem evalFacProps {l : Products I} (J K : I → Prop)
(h : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)] [∀ j, Decidable (K j)]
(hJK : ∀ i, J i → K i) :
l.eval (π C J) ∘ ProjRestricts C hJK = l.eval (π C K) := by
have : l.eval (π C J) ∘ Homeomorph.setCongr (proj_eq_of_subset C J K hJK) =
l.eval (π (π C K) J) := by
ext; simp [Homeomorph.setCongr, Products.eval_eq]
rw [ProjRestricts, ← Function.comp.assoc, this, ← evalFacProp (π C K) J h]
theorem prop_of_isGood {l : Products I} (J : I → Prop) [∀ j, Decidable (J j)]
(h : l.isGood (π C J)) : ∀ a, a ∈ l.val → J a := by
intro i hi
by_contra h'
apply h
suffices eval (π C J) l = 0 by
rw [this]
exact Submodule.zero_mem _
ext ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
rw [eval_eq, if_neg fun h ↦ ?_, LocallyConstant.zero_apply]
simpa [Proj, h'] using h i hi
end Products
/-- The good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` if and only all the products do. -/
theorem GoodProducts.span_iff_products : ⊤ ≤ span ℤ (Set.range (eval C)) ↔
⊤ ≤ span ℤ (Set.range (Products.eval C)) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ le_trans h (span_mono (fun a ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b.val, hb⟩)), fun h ↦ le_trans h ?_⟩
rw [span_le]
rintro f ⟨l, rfl⟩
let L : Products I → Prop := fun m ↦ m.eval C ∈ span ℤ (Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C))
suffices L l by assumption
apply IsWellFounded.induction (·<· : Products I → Products I → Prop)
intro l h
dsimp
by_cases hl : l.isGood C
· apply subset_span
exact ⟨⟨l, hl⟩, rfl⟩
· simp only [Products.isGood, not_not] at hl
suffices Products.eval C '' {m | m < l} ⊆ span ℤ (Set.range (GoodProducts.eval C)) by
rw [← span_le] at this
exact this hl
rintro a ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩
exact h m hm
end Products
section Span
/-!
## The good products span
Most of the argument is developing an API for `π C (· ∈ s)` when `s : Finset I`; then the image
of `C` is finite with the discrete topology. In this case, there is a direct argument that the good
products span. The general result is deduced from this.
### Main theorems
* `GoodProducts.spanFin` : The good products span the locally constant functions on `π C (· ∈ s)`
if `s` is finite.
* `GoodProducts.span` : The good products span `LocallyConstant C ℤ` for every closed subset `C`.
-/
section Fin
variable (s : Finset I)
/-- The `ℤ`-linear map induced by precomposition of the projection `C → π C (· ∈ s)`. -/
noncomputable
def πJ : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ →ₗ[ℤ] LocallyConstant C ℤ :=
LocallyConstant.comapₗ ℤ ⟨_, (continuous_projRestrict C (· ∈ s))⟩
theorem eval_eq_πJ (l : Products I) (hl : l.isGood (π C (· ∈ s))) :
l.eval C = πJ C s (l.eval (π C (· ∈ s))) := by
ext f
simp only [πJ, LocallyConstant.comapₗ, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
(continuous_projRestrict C (· ∈ s)), LocallyConstant.coe_comap, Function.comp_apply]
exact (congr_fun (Products.evalFacProp C (· ∈ s) (Products.prop_of_isGood C (· ∈ s) hl)) _).symm
/-- `π C (· ∈ s)` is finite for a finite set `s`. -/
noncomputable
instance : Fintype (π C (· ∈ s)) := by
let f : π C (· ∈ s) → (s → Bool) := fun x j ↦ x.val j.val
refine Fintype.ofInjective f ?_
intro ⟨_, x, hx, rfl⟩ ⟨_, y, hy, rfl⟩ h
ext i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· exact congrFun h ⟨i, hi⟩
· simp only [Proj, if_neg hi]
open scoped Classical in
/-- The Kronecker delta as a locally constant map from `π C (· ∈ s)` to `ℤ`. -/
noncomputable
def spanFinBasis (x : π C (· ∈ s)) : LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ where
toFun := fun y ↦ if y = x then 1 else 0
isLocallyConstant :=
haveI : DiscreteTopology (π C (· ∈ s)) := discrete_of_t1_of_finite
IsLocallyConstant.of_discrete _
open scoped Classical in
theorem spanFinBasis.span : ⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (spanFinBasis C s)) := by
intro f _
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_range_iff_exists_finsupp]
use Finsupp.onFinset (Finset.univ) f.toFun (fun _ _ ↦ Finset.mem_univ _)
ext x
change LocallyConstant.evalₗ ℤ x _ = _
simp only [zsmul_eq_mul, map_finsupp_sum, LocallyConstant.evalₗ_apply,
LocallyConstant.coe_mul, Pi.mul_apply, spanFinBasis, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, mul_ite, mul_one,
mul_zero, Finsupp.sum_ite_eq, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, ite_not]
split_ifs with h <;> [exact h.symm; rfl]
/--
A certain explicit list of locally constant maps. The theorem `factors_prod_eq_basis` shows that the
product of the elements in this list is the delta function `spanFinBasis C s x`.
-/
def factors (x : π C (· ∈ s)) : List (LocallyConstant (π C (· ∈ s)) ℤ) :=
List.map (fun i ↦ if x.val i = true then e (π C (· ∈ s)) i else (1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) i)))
(s.sort (·≥·))
theorem list_prod_apply (x : C) (l : List (LocallyConstant C ℤ)) :
l.prod x = (l.map (LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x)).prod := by
rw [← map_list_prod (LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom x) l]
rfl
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis_of_eq {x y : (π C fun x ↦ x ∈ s)} (h : y = x) :
(factors C s x).prod y = 1 := by
rw [list_prod_apply (π C (· ∈ s)) y _]
apply List.prod_eq_one
simp only [h, List.mem_map, LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom, factors]
rintro _ ⟨a, ⟨b, _, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with hh
· rw [e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_pos hh]
· rw [LocallyConstant.sub_apply, e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_neg hh]
simp only [LocallyConstant.toFun_eq_coe, LocallyConstant.coe_one, Pi.one_apply, sub_zero]
theorem e_mem_of_eq_true {x : (π C (· ∈ s))} {a : I} (hx : x.val a = true) :
e (π C (· ∈ s)) a ∈ factors C s x := by
rcases x with ⟨_, z, hz, rfl⟩
simp only [factors, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_sort]
refine ⟨a, ?_, if_pos hx⟩
aesop (add simp Proj)
theorem one_sub_e_mem_of_false {x y : (π C (· ∈ s))} {a : I} (ha : y.val a = true)
(hx : x.val a = false) : 1 - e (π C (· ∈ s)) a ∈ factors C s x := by
simp only [factors, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_sort]
use a
simp only [hx, ite_false, and_true]
rcases y with ⟨_, z, hz, rfl⟩
aesop (add simp Proj)
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis_of_ne {x y : (π C (· ∈ s))} (h : y ≠ x) :
(factors C s x).prod y = 0 := by
rw [list_prod_apply (π C (· ∈ s)) y _]
apply List.prod_eq_zero
simp only [List.mem_map]
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, y.val a ≠ x.val a := by contrapose! h; ext; apply h
cases hx : x.val a
· rw [hx, ne_eq, Bool.not_eq_false] at ha
refine ⟨1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a), ⟨one_sub_e_mem_of_false _ _ ha hx, ?_⟩⟩
rw [e, LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom_apply, LocallyConstant.sub_apply,
LocallyConstant.coe_one, Pi.one_apply, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_pos ha, sub_self]
· refine ⟨e (π C (· ∈ s)) a, ⟨e_mem_of_eq_true _ _ hx, ?_⟩⟩
rw [hx] at ha
rw [LocallyConstant.evalMonoidHom_apply, e, LocallyConstant.coe_mk, if_neg ha]
/-- If `s` is finite, the product of the elements of the list `factors C s x`
is the delta function at `x`. -/
theorem factors_prod_eq_basis (x : π C (· ∈ s)) :
(factors C s x).prod = spanFinBasis C s x := by
ext y
dsimp [spanFinBasis]
split_ifs with h <;> [exact factors_prod_eq_basis_of_eq _ _ h;
exact factors_prod_eq_basis_of_ne _ _ h]
theorem GoodProducts.finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval {a : I} {as : List I}
(ha : List.Chain' (· > ·) (a :: as)) {c : Products I →₀ ℤ}
(hc : (c.support : Set (Products I)) ⊆ {m | m.val ≤ as}) :
(Finsupp.sum c fun a_1 b ↦ e (π C (· ∈ s)) a * b • Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s)) a_1) ∈
Submodule.span ℤ (Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s)) '' {m | m.val ≤ a :: as}) := by
apply Submodule.finsupp_sum_mem
intro m hm
have hsm := (LinearMap.mulLeft ℤ (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a)).map_smul
dsimp at hsm
rw [hsm]
apply Submodule.smul_mem
apply Submodule.subset_span
have hmas : m.val ≤ as := by
apply hc
simpa only [Finset.mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] using hm
refine ⟨⟨a :: m.val, ha.cons_of_le m.prop hmas⟩, ⟨List.cons_le_cons a hmas, ?_⟩⟩
simp only [Products.eval, List.map, List.prod_cons]
/-- If `s` is a finite subset of `I`, then the good products span. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/Profinite/Nobeling.lean | 599 | 649 | theorem GoodProducts.spanFin : ⊤ ≤ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (eval (π C (· ∈ s)))) := by |
rw [span_iff_products]
refine le_trans (spanFinBasis.span C s) ?_
rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [← factors_prod_eq_basis]
let l := s.sort (·≥·)
dsimp [factors]
suffices l.Chain' (·>·) → (l.map (fun i ↦ if x.val i = true then e (π C (· ∈ s)) i
else (1 - (e (π C (· ∈ s)) i)))).prod ∈
Submodule.span ℤ ((Products.eval (π C (· ∈ s))) '' {m | m.val ≤ l}) from
Submodule.span_mono (Set.image_subset_range _ _) (this (Finset.sort_sorted_gt _).chain')
induction l with
| nil =>
intro _
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨⟨[], List.chain'_nil⟩,⟨Or.inl rfl, rfl⟩⟩
| cons a as ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons]
intro ha
specialize ih (by rw [List.chain'_cons'] at ha; exact ha.2)
rw [Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at ih
simp only [Finsupp.mem_supported, Finsupp.total_apply] at ih
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := ih
rw [← hc']; clear hc'
have hmap := fun g ↦ map_finsupp_sum (LinearMap.mulLeft ℤ (e (π C (· ∈ s)) a)) c g
dsimp at hmap ⊢
split_ifs
· rw [hmap]
exact finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval _ _ ha hc
· ring_nf
rw [hmap]
apply Submodule.add_mem
· apply Submodule.neg_mem
exact finsupp_sum_mem_span_eval _ _ ha hc
· apply Submodule.finsupp_sum_mem
intro m hm
apply Submodule.smul_mem
apply Submodule.subset_span
refine ⟨m, ⟨?_, rfl⟩⟩
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
have hmas : m.val ≤ as :=
hc (by simpa only [Finset.mem_coe, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] using hm)
refine le_trans hmas ?_
cases as with
| nil => exact (List.nil_lt_cons a []).le
| cons b bs =>
apply le_of_lt
rw [List.chain'_cons] at ha
have hlex := List.lt.head bs (b :: bs) ha.1
exact (List.lt_iff_lex_lt _ _).mp hlex
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
/-!
# Verification of the `Ordnode α` datatype
This file proves the correctness of the operations in `Data.Ordmap.Ordnode`.
The public facing version is the type `Ordset α`, which is a wrapper around
`Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type, and it exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same
thing but bundle the correctness proofs. The advantage is that it is possible
to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert` will actually find
the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`
## Implementation notes
The majority of this file is actually in the `Ordnode` namespace, because we first
have to prove the correctness of all the operations (and defining what correctness
means here is actually somewhat subtle). So all the actual `Ordset` operations are
at the very end, once we have all the theorems.
An `Ordnode α` is an inductive type which describes a tree which stores the `size` at
internal nodes. The correctness invariant of an `Ordnode α` is:
* `Ordnode.Sized t`: All internal `size` fields must match the actual measured
size of the tree. (This is not hard to satisfy.)
* `Ordnode.Balanced t`: Unless the tree has the form `()` or `((a) b)` or `(a (b))`
(that is, nil or a single singleton subtree), the two subtrees must satisfy
`size l ≤ δ * size r` and `size r ≤ δ * size l`, where `δ := 3` is a global
parameter of the data structure (and this property must hold recursively at subtrees).
This is why we say this is a "size balanced tree" data structure.
* `Ordnode.Bounded lo hi t`: The members of the tree must be in strictly increasing order,
meaning that if `a` is in the left subtree and `b` is the root, then `a ≤ b` and
`¬ (b ≤ a)`. We enforce this using `Ordnode.Bounded` which includes also a global
upper and lower bound.
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
**Note:** This file is incomplete, in the sense that the intent is to have verified
versions and lemmas about all the definitions in `Ordnode.lean`, but at the moment only
a few operations are verified (the hard part should be out of the way, but still).
Contributors are encouraged to pick this up and finish the job, if it appeals to you.
## Tags
ordered map, ordered set, data structure, verified programming
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
/-! ### delta and ratio -/
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
/-! ### `singleton` -/
/-! ### `size` and `empty` -/
/-- O(n). Computes the actual number of elements in the set, ignoring the cached `size` field. -/
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
/-! ### `Sized` -/
/-- The `Sized` property asserts that all the `size` fields in nodes match the actual size of the
respective subtrees. -/
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
/-! `dual` -/
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
/-! `Balanced` -/
/-- The `BalancedSz l r` asserts that a hypothetical tree with children of sizes `l` and `r` is
balanced: either `l ≤ δ * r` and `r ≤ δ * r`, or the tree is trivial with a singleton on one side
and nothing on the other. -/
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
/-- The `Balanced t` asserts that the tree `t` satisfies the balance invariants
(at every level). -/
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
/-! ### `rotate` and `balance` -/
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, left associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, right associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> (a ()) b` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> a (() b)` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a left rotation `x (y z) -> ((x y) z)`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a right rotation `(x y) z -> (x (y z))`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- A left balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
/-- A right balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
/-- The full balance operation. This is the same as `balance`, but with less manual inlining.
It is somewhat easier to work with this version in proofs. -/
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 316 | 318 | theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by |
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoundedVariation
#align_import analysis.constant_speed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Constant speed
This file defines the notion of constant (and unit) speed for a function `f : ℝ → E` with
pseudo-emetric structure on `E` with respect to a set `s : Set ℝ` and "speed" `l : ℝ≥0`, and shows
that if `f` has locally bounded variation on `s`, it can be obtained (up to distance zero, on `s`),
as a composite `φ ∘ (variationOnFromTo f s a)`, where `φ` has unit speed and `a ∈ s`.
## Main definitions
* `HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `l`.
* `HasUnitSpeedOn f s`, stating that the speed of `f` on `s` is `1`.
* `naturalParameterization f s a : ℝ → E`, the unit speed reparameterization of `f` on `s` relative
to `a`.
## Main statements
* `unique_unit_speed_on_Icc_zero` proves that if `f` and `f ∘ φ` are both naturally
parameterized on closed intervals starting at `0`, then `φ` must be the identity on
those intervals.
* `edist_naturalParameterization_eq_zero` proves that if `f` has locally bounded variation, then
precomposing `naturalParameterization f s a` with `variationOnFromTo f s a` yields a function
at distance zero from `f` on `s`.
* `has_unit_speed_naturalParameterization` proves that if `f` has locally bounded
variation, then `naturalParameterization f s a` has unit speed on `s`.
## Tags
arc-length, parameterization
-/
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
open Set MeasureTheory Classical
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {E : Type*} [PseudoEMetricSpace E]
variable (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) (l : ℝ≥0)
/-- `f` has constant speed `l` on `s` if the variation of `f` on `s ∩ Icc x y` is equal to
`l * (y - x)` for any `x y` in `s`.
-/
def HasConstantSpeedOnWith :=
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x))
#align has_constant_speed_on_with HasConstantSpeedOnWith
variable {f s l}
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn (h : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l) :
LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s := fun x y hx hy => by
simp only [BoundedVariationOn, h hx hy, Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, not_false_iff]
#align has_constant_speed_on_with.has_locally_bounded_variation_on HasConstantSpeedOnWith.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_of_subsingleton (f : ℝ → E) {s : Set ℝ} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(l : ℝ≥0) : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l := by
rintro x hx y hy; cases hs hx hy
rw [eVariationOn.subsingleton f (fun y hy z hz => hs hy.1 hz.1 : (s ∩ Icc x x).Subsingleton)]
simp only [sub_self, mul_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
#align has_constant_speed_on_with_of_subsingleton hasConstantSpeedOnWith_of_subsingleton
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s),
x ≤ y → eVariationOn f (s ∩ Icc x y) = ENNReal.ofReal (l * (y - x)) := by
refine ⟨fun h x xs y ys _ => h xs ys, fun h x xs y ys => ?_⟩
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· exact h xs ys xy
· rw [eVariationOn.subsingleton, ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos]
· exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos l.prop (sub_nonpos_of_le yx)
· rintro z ⟨zs, xz, zy⟩ w ⟨ws, xw, wy⟩
cases le_antisymm (zy.trans yx) xz
cases le_antisymm (wy.trans yx) xw
rfl
#align has_constant_speed_on_with_iff_ordered hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l ↔ LocallyBoundedVariationOn f s ∧
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_ : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_ : y ∈ s), variationOnFromTo f s x y = l * (y - x) := by
constructor
· rintro h; refine ⟨h.hasLocallyBoundedVariationOn, fun x xs y ys => ?_⟩
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered] at h
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le f s xy, h xs ys xy]
exact ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr xy))
· rw [variationOnFromTo.eq_of_ge f s yx, h ys xs yx]
have := ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr yx))
simp_all only [NNReal.val_eq_coe]; ring
· rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered]
rintro h x xs y ys xy
rw [← h.2 xs ys, variationOnFromTo.eq_of_le f s xy, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (h.1 x y xs ys)]
#align has_constant_speed_on_with_iff_variation_on_from_to_eq hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.union {t : Set ℝ} (hfs : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s l)
(hft : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f t l) {x : ℝ} (hs : IsGreatest s x) (ht : IsLeast t x) :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (s ∪ t) l := by
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_ordered] at hfs hft ⊢
rintro z (zs | zt) y (ys | yt) zy
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = s ∩ Icc z y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨ws, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨(le_antisymm (wy.trans (hs.2 ys)) (ht.2 wt)).symm ▸ hs.1, zw, wy⟩
· rintro ⟨ws, zwy⟩; exact ⟨Or.inl ws, zwy⟩
rw [this, hfs zs ys zy]
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = s ∩ Icc z x ∪ t ∩ Icc x y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
exacts [Or.inl ⟨ws, zw, hs.2 ws⟩, Or.inr ⟨wt, ht.2 wt, wy⟩]
· rintro (⟨ws, zw, wx⟩ | ⟨wt, xw, wy⟩)
exacts [⟨Or.inl ws, zw, wx.trans (ht.2 yt)⟩, ⟨Or.inr wt, (hs.2 zs).trans xw, wy⟩]
rw [this, @eVariationOn.union _ _ _ _ f _ _ x, hfs zs hs.1 (hs.2 zs), hft ht.1 yt (ht.2 yt)]
· have q := ENNReal.ofReal_add (mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr (hs.2 zs)))
(mul_nonneg l.prop (sub_nonneg.mpr (ht.2 yt)))
simp only [NNReal.val_eq_coe] at q
rw [← q]
ring_nf
exacts [⟨⟨hs.1, hs.2 zs, le_rfl⟩, fun w ⟨_, _, wx⟩ => wx⟩,
⟨⟨ht.1, le_rfl, ht.2 yt⟩, fun w ⟨_, xw, _⟩ => xw⟩]
· cases le_antisymm zy ((hs.2 ys).trans (ht.2 zt))
simp only [Icc_self, sub_self, mul_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact eVariationOn.subsingleton _ fun _ ⟨_, uz⟩ _ ⟨_, vz⟩ => uz.trans vz.symm
· have : (s ∪ t) ∩ Icc z y = t ∩ Icc z y := by
ext w; constructor
· rintro ⟨ws | wt, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨le_antisymm ((ht.2 zt).trans zw) (hs.2 ws) ▸ ht.1, zw, wy⟩
· exact ⟨wt, zw, wy⟩
· rintro ⟨wt, zwy⟩; exact ⟨Or.inr wt, zwy⟩
rw [this, hft zt yt zy]
#align has_constant_speed_on_with.union HasConstantSpeedOnWith.union
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.Icc_Icc {x y z : ℝ} (hfs : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc x y) l)
(hft : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc y z) l) : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (Icc x z) l := by
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· rcases le_total y z with (yz | zy)
· rw [← Set.Icc_union_Icc_eq_Icc xy yz]
exact hfs.union hft (isGreatest_Icc xy) (isLeast_Icc yz)
· rintro u ⟨xu, uz⟩ v ⟨xv, vz⟩
rw [Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu, inf_of_le_right vz, ←
hfs ⟨xu, uz.trans zy⟩ ⟨xv, vz.trans zy⟩, Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu,
inf_of_le_right (vz.trans zy)]
· rintro u ⟨xu, uz⟩ v ⟨xv, vz⟩
rw [Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right xu, inf_of_le_right vz, ←
hft ⟨yx.trans xu, uz⟩ ⟨yx.trans xv, vz⟩, Icc_inter_Icc, sup_of_le_right (yx.trans xu),
inf_of_le_right vz]
#align has_constant_speed_on_with.Icc_Icc HasConstantSpeedOnWith.Icc_Icc
theorem hasConstantSpeedOnWith_zero_iff :
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s 0 ↔ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), edist (f x) (f y) = 0 := by
dsimp [HasConstantSpeedOnWith]
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· by_contra!
obtain ⟨h, hfs⟩ := this
simp_rw [ne_eq, eVariationOn.eq_zero_iff] at hfs h
push_neg at hfs
obtain ⟨x, xs, y, ys, hxy⟩ := hfs
rcases le_total x y with (xy | yx)
· exact hxy (h xs ys x ⟨xs, le_rfl, xy⟩ y ⟨ys, xy, le_rfl⟩)
· rw [edist_comm] at hxy
exact hxy (h ys xs y ⟨ys, le_rfl, yx⟩ x ⟨xs, yx, le_rfl⟩)
· rintro h x _ y _
refine le_antisymm ?_ zero_le'
rw [← h]
exact eVariationOn.mono f inter_subset_left
#align has_constant_speed_on_with_zero_iff hasConstantSpeedOnWith_zero_iff
theorem HasConstantSpeedOnWith.ratio {l' : ℝ≥0} (hl' : l' ≠ 0) {φ : ℝ → ℝ} (φm : MonotoneOn φ s)
(hfφ : HasConstantSpeedOnWith (f ∘ φ) s l) (hf : HasConstantSpeedOnWith f (φ '' s) l') ⦃x : ℝ⦄
(xs : x ∈ s) : EqOn φ (fun y => l / l' * (y - x) + φ x) s := by
rintro y ys
rw [← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, eq_div_iff (NNReal.coe_ne_zero.mpr hl')]
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq] at hf
rw [hasConstantSpeedOnWith_iff_variationOnFromTo_eq] at hfφ
symm
calc
(y - x) * l = l * (y - x) := by rw [mul_comm]
_ = variationOnFromTo (f ∘ φ) s x y := (hfφ.2 xs ys).symm
_ = variationOnFromTo f (φ '' s) (φ x) (φ y) :=
(variationOnFromTo.comp_eq_of_monotoneOn f φ φm xs ys)
_ = l' * (φ y - φ x) := (hf.2 ⟨x, xs, rfl⟩ ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩)
_ = (φ y - φ x) * l' := by rw [mul_comm]
#align has_constant_speed_on_with.ratio HasConstantSpeedOnWith.ratio
/-- `f` has unit speed on `s` if it is linearly parameterized by `l = 1` on `s`. -/
def HasUnitSpeedOn (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) :=
HasConstantSpeedOnWith f s 1
#align has_unit_speed_on HasUnitSpeedOn
theorem HasUnitSpeedOn.union {t : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ} (hfs : HasUnitSpeedOn f s)
(hft : HasUnitSpeedOn f t) (hs : IsGreatest s x) (ht : IsLeast t x) :
HasUnitSpeedOn f (s ∪ t) :=
HasConstantSpeedOnWith.union hfs hft hs ht
#align has_unit_speed_on.union HasUnitSpeedOn.union
theorem HasUnitSpeedOn.Icc_Icc {x y z : ℝ} (hfs : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc x y))
(hft : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc y z)) : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc x z) :=
HasConstantSpeedOnWith.Icc_Icc hfs hft
#align has_unit_speed_on.Icc_Icc HasUnitSpeedOn.Icc_Icc
/-- If both `f` and `f ∘ φ` have unit speed (on `t` and `s` respectively) and `φ`
monotonically maps `s` onto `t`, then `φ` is just a translation (on `s`).
-/
theorem unique_unit_speed {φ : ℝ → ℝ} (φm : MonotoneOn φ s) (hfφ : HasUnitSpeedOn (f ∘ φ) s)
(hf : HasUnitSpeedOn f (φ '' s)) ⦃x : ℝ⦄ (xs : x ∈ s) : EqOn φ (fun y => y - x + φ x) s := by
dsimp only [HasUnitSpeedOn] at hf hfφ
convert HasConstantSpeedOnWith.ratio one_ne_zero φm hfφ hf xs using 3
norm_num
#align unique_unit_speed unique_unit_speed
/-- If both `f` and `f ∘ φ` have unit speed (on `Icc 0 t` and `Icc 0 s` respectively)
and `φ` monotonically maps `Icc 0 s` onto `Icc 0 t`, then `φ` is the identity on `Icc 0 s`
-/
| Mathlib/Analysis/ConstantSpeed.lean | 222 | 235 | theorem unique_unit_speed_on_Icc_zero {s t : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) (ht : 0 ≤ t) {φ : ℝ → ℝ}
(φm : MonotoneOn φ <| Icc 0 s) (φst : φ '' Icc 0 s = Icc 0 t)
(hfφ : HasUnitSpeedOn (f ∘ φ) (Icc 0 s)) (hf : HasUnitSpeedOn f (Icc 0 t)) :
EqOn φ id (Icc 0 s) := by |
rw [← φst] at hf
convert unique_unit_speed φm hfφ hf ⟨le_rfl, hs⟩ using 1
have : φ 0 = 0 := by
have hm : 0 ∈ φ '' Icc 0 s := by simp only [φst, ht, mem_Icc, le_refl, and_self]
obtain ⟨x, xs, hx⟩ := hm
apply le_antisymm ((φm ⟨le_rfl, hs⟩ xs xs.1).trans_eq hx) _
have := φst ▸ mapsTo_image φ (Icc 0 s)
exact (mem_Icc.mp (@this 0 (by rw [mem_Icc]; exact ⟨le_rfl, hs⟩))).1
simp only [tsub_zero, this, add_zero]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
#align_import data.finset.locally_finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
#align finset.nonempty_Icc Finset.nonempty_Icc
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
#align finset.nonempty_Ico Finset.nonempty_Ico
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
#align finset.nonempty_Ioc Finset.nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
#align finset.nonempty_Ioo Finset.nonempty_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff Finset.Icc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ico_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_iff
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty Finset.Icc_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty Finset.Ico_eq_empty
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty Finset.Ioc_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty Finset.Ioo_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
#align finset.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt Finset.Icc_eq_empty_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ico_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ioc_eq_empty_of_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
#align finset.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le Finset.Ioo_eq_empty_of_le
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.left_mem_Icc Finset.left_mem_Icc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and_iff, le_refl]
#align finset.left_mem_Ico Finset.left_mem_Ico
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.right_mem_Icc Finset.right_mem_Icc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true_iff, le_rfl]
#align finset.right_mem_Ioc Finset.right_mem_Ioc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
#align finset.left_not_mem_Ioc Finset.left_not_mem_Ioc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
#align finset.left_not_mem_Ioo Finset.left_not_mem_Ioo
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
#align finset.right_not_mem_Ico Finset.right_not_mem_Ico
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
#align finset.right_not_mem_Ioo Finset.right_not_mem_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc Finset.Icc_subset_Icc
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico Finset.Ico_subset_Ico
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_left Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_right Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_right Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioc_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ioo_left Finset.Ico_subset_Ioo_left
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ico_right Finset.Icc_subset_Ico_right
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ico_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Icc_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Icc_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ico_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff Finset.Icc_subset_Ioc_iff
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
#align finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left Finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
#align finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right Finset.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right
variable (a)
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ico_self Finset.Ico_self
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ioc_self Finset.Ioc_self
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
#align finset.Ioo_self Finset.Ioo_self
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
#align set.fintype_of_mem_bounds Set.fintypeOfMemBounds
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
(Ico a b).filter (· < c) = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right Finset.Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
(Ico a b).filter (c ≤ ·) = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_le_left
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
(Ico a b).filter (b ≤ ·) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_right_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
(Ico a b).filter (c ≤ ·) = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le Finset.Ico_filter_le_of_left_le
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
(Icc a b).filter (· < c) = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
#align finset.Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
(Ioc a b).filter (· < c) = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
#align finset.Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : (Iic a).filter (· < c) = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
#align finset.Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right Finset.Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a < j ∧ j < b) = Ioo a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo Finset.filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b) = Ioc a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc Finset.filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b) = Ico a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_lt_eq_Ico Finset.filter_le_lt_eq_Ico
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
(univ.filter fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b) = Icc a b := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_le_eq_Icc Finset.filter_le_le_eq_Icc
end Filter
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Icc_subset_Ici_self Finset.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Icc_subset_Iic_self Finset.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ioc_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self Finset.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Iio_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ico_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ico_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Ioo_subset_Iic_self Finset.Ioo_subset_Iic_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
#align finset.Ioi_subset_Ici_self Finset.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
#align bdd_below.finite BddBelow.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
#align set.infinite.not_bdd_below Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : univ.filter (a < ·) = Ioi a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_lt_eq_Ioi Finset.filter_lt_eq_Ioi
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : univ.filter (a ≤ ·) = Ici a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_le_eq_Ici Finset.filter_le_eq_Ici
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
#align finset.Iio_subset_Iic_self Finset.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
#align bdd_above.finite BddAbove.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
#align set.infinite.not_bdd_above Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : univ.filter (· < a) = Iio a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_gt_eq_Iio Finset.filter_gt_eq_Iio
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : univ.filter (· ≤ a) = Iic a := by
ext
simp
#align finset.filter_ge_eq_Iic Finset.filter_ge_eq_Iic
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
#align finset.disjoint_Ioi_Iio Finset.disjoint_Ioi_Iio
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
#align finset.Icc_self Finset.Icc_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
#align finset.Icc_eq_singleton_iff Finset.Icc_eq_singleton_iff
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
#align finset.Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive Finset.Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_erase_left Finset.Icc_erase_left
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_erase_right Finset.Icc_erase_right
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Ico_erase_left Finset.Ico_erase_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Ioc_erase_right Finset.Ioc_erase_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
#align finset.Icc_diff_both Finset.Icc_diff_both
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
#align finset.Ico_insert_right Finset.Ico_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
#align finset.Ioc_insert_left Finset.Ioc_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
#align finset.Ioo_insert_left Finset.Ioo_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
#align finset.Ioo_insert_right Finset.Ioo_insert_right
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ico_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ico_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ioc_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ioc_self
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Icc_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Icc_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Ico_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
#align finset.Ioc_diff_Ioo_self Finset.Ioc_diff_Ioo_self
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
#align finset.Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive Finset.Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
#align finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ico Finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ico
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
#align finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ioc Finset.Icc_eq_cons_Ioc
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
#align finset.Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo Finset.Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
#align finset.Ico_eq_cons_Ioo Finset.Ico_eq_cons_Ioo
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
((Ico a b).filter fun x => x ≤ a) = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
#align finset.Ico_filter_le_left Finset.Ico_filter_le_left
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ico a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
#align finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one Finset.card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one Finset.card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ico a b).card - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Ioc a b).card - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : (Ioo a b).card = (Icc a b).card - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
#align finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two Finset.card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two
end PartialOrder
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
#align finset.Ici_erase Finset.Ici_erase
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
#align finset.Ioi_insert Finset.Ioi_insert
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
#align finset.not_mem_Ioi_self Finset.not_mem_Ioi_self
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
#align finset.Ici_eq_cons_Ioi Finset.Ici_eq_cons_Ioi
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : (Ioi a).card = (Ici a).card - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one Finset.card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_erase [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : (Iic b).erase b = Iio b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm]
#align finset.Iic_erase Finset.Iic_erase
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : insert b (Iio b) = Iic b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
#align finset.Iio_insert Finset.Iio_insert
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self {b : α} : b ∉ Iio b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Iio.1 h)
#align finset.not_mem_Iio_self Finset.not_mem_Iio_self
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Iio_insert`. -/
theorem Iic_eq_cons_Iio (b : α) : Iic b = (Iio b).cons b not_mem_Iio_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Iio_insert]
#align finset.Iic_eq_cons_Iio Finset.Iic_eq_cons_Iio
theorem card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one (a : α) : (Iio a).card = (Iic a).card - 1 := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align finset.card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one Finset.card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one
end OrderBot
end BoundedPartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
-- TODO: Why does `id_eq` simplify the LHS here but not the LHS of `Finset.sup_Iic`?
lemma sup'_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a).sup' nonempty_Iic id = a :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup' (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma sup_Iic [OrderBot α] (a : α) : (Iic a).sup id = a :=
le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
lemma inf'_Ici (a : α) : (Ici a).inf' nonempty_Ici id = a :=
ge_antisymm (le_inf' _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1) <| inf'_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma inf_Ici [OrderTop α] (a : α) : (Ici a).inf id = a :=
le_antisymm (inf_le (f := id) <| mem_Ici.2 <| le_refl a) <| Finset.le_inf fun _ ↦ mem_Ici.1
end SemilatticeInf
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_iff {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : α} (h : a₁ < b₁) :
Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_subset_Ico_iff h]
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_iff
theorem Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico {a b c : α} (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico b c = Ico a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hab hbc]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico Finset.Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : b ≤ c) :
Ioc a b ∪ Ioc b c = Ioc a c := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc h₁ h₂]
#align finset.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc Finset.Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico {a b c : α} : Ico a c ⊆ Ico a b ∪ Ico b c := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
#align finset.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico Finset.Ico_subset_Ico_union_Ico
theorem Ico_union_Ico' {a b c d : α} (hcb : c ≤ b) (had : a ≤ d) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico' hcb had]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico' Finset.Ico_union_Ico'
theorem Ico_union_Ico {a b c d : α} (h₁ : min a b ≤ max c d) (h₂ : min c d ≤ max a b) :
Ico a b ∪ Ico c d = Ico (min a c) (max b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_union, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_union_Ico h₁ h₂]
#align finset.Ico_union_Ico Finset.Ico_union_Ico
theorem Ico_inter_Ico {a b c d : α} : Ico a b ∩ Ico c d = Ico (max a c) (min b d) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, coe_Ico, ← inf_eq_min, ← sup_eq_max,
Set.Ico_inter_Ico]
#align finset.Ico_inter_Ico Finset.Ico_inter_Ico
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_lt (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => x < c) = Ico a (min b c) := by
cases le_total b c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le h, min_eq_left h]
| inr h => rw [Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right h, min_eq_right h]
#align finset.Ico_filter_lt Finset.Ico_filter_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_filter_le (a b c : α) : ((Ico a b).filter fun x => c ≤ x) = Ico (max a c) b := by
cases le_total a c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_filter_le_of_left_le h, max_eq_right h]
| inr h => rw [Ico_filter_le_of_le_left h, max_eq_left h]
#align finset.Ico_filter_le Finset.Ico_filter_le
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_filter_lt (a b c : α) : (Ioo a b).filter (· < c) = Ioo a (min b c) := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align finset.Ioo_filter_lt Finset.Ioo_filter_lt
@[simp]
theorem Iio_filter_lt {α} [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] (a b : α) :
(Iio a).filter (· < b) = Iio (min a b) := by
ext
simp [and_assoc]
#align finset.Iio_filter_lt Finset.Iio_filter_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ico_left (a b c : α) : Ico a b \ Ico a c = Ico (max a c) b := by
cases le_total a c with
| inl h =>
ext x
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, max_eq_right h, and_right_comm, not_and, not_lt]
exact and_congr_left' ⟨fun hx => hx.2 hx.1, fun hx => ⟨h.trans hx, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
| inr h => rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, sdiff_empty, max_eq_left h]
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_left
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ico_right (a b c : α) : Ico a b \ Ico c b = Ico a (min b c) := by
cases le_total b c with
| inl h => rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, sdiff_empty, min_eq_left h]
| inr h =>
ext x
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, min_eq_right h, and_assoc, not_and', not_le]
exact and_congr_right' ⟨fun hx => hx.2 hx.1, fun hx => ⟨hx.trans_le h, fun _ => hx⟩⟩
#align finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right Finset.Ico_diff_Ico_right
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {s : Set α}
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.exists_gt (hs : s.Infinite) : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
not_bddAbove_iff.1 hs.not_bddAbove
#align set.infinite.exists_gt Set.Infinite.exists_gt
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_exists_gt [Nonempty α] : s.Infinite ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
⟨Set.Infinite.exists_gt, Set.infinite_of_forall_exists_gt⟩
#align set.infinite_iff_exists_gt Set.infinite_iff_exists_gt
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {s : Set α}
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.exists_lt (hs : s.Infinite) : ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
not_bddBelow_iff.1 hs.not_bddBelow
#align set.infinite.exists_lt Set.Infinite.exists_lt
theorem _root_.Set.infinite_iff_exists_lt [Nonempty α] : s.Infinite ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
⟨Set.Infinite.exists_lt, Set.infinite_of_forall_exists_lt⟩
#align set.infinite_iff_exists_lt Set.infinite_iff_exists_lt
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [Fintype α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem Ioi_disjUnion_Iio (a : α) :
(Ioi a).disjUnion (Iio a) (disjoint_Ioi_Iio a) = ({a} : Finset α)ᶜ := by
ext
simp [eq_comm]
#align finset.Ioi_disj_union_Iio Finset.Ioi_disjUnion_Iio
end LinearOrder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
theorem uIcc_toDual (a b : α) : [[toDual a, toDual b]] = [[a, b]].map toDual.toEmbedding :=
Icc_toDual _ _
#align finset.uIcc_to_dual Finset.uIcc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem uIcc_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : [[a, b]] = Icc a b := by
rw [uIcc, inf_eq_left.2 h, sup_eq_right.2 h]
#align finset.uIcc_of_le Finset.uIcc_of_le
@[simp]
theorem uIcc_of_ge (h : b ≤ a) : [[a, b]] = Icc b a := by
rw [uIcc, inf_eq_right.2 h, sup_eq_left.2 h]
#align finset.uIcc_of_ge Finset.uIcc_of_ge
theorem uIcc_comm (a b : α) : [[a, b]] = [[b, a]] := by
rw [uIcc, uIcc, inf_comm, sup_comm]
#align finset.uIcc_comm Finset.uIcc_comm
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem uIcc_self : [[a, a]] = {a} := by simp [uIcc]
#align finset.uIcc_self Finset.uIcc_self
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_uIcc : Finset.Nonempty [[a, b]] :=
nonempty_Icc.2 inf_le_sup
#align finset.nonempty_uIcc Finset.nonempty_uIcc
theorem Icc_subset_uIcc : Icc a b ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_Icc inf_le_left le_sup_right
#align finset.Icc_subset_uIcc Finset.Icc_subset_uIcc
theorem Icc_subset_uIcc' : Icc b a ⊆ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_Icc inf_le_right le_sup_left
#align finset.Icc_subset_uIcc' Finset.Icc_subset_uIcc'
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem left_mem_uIcc : a ∈ [[a, b]] :=
mem_Icc.2 ⟨inf_le_left, le_sup_left⟩
#align finset.left_mem_uIcc Finset.left_mem_uIcc
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem right_mem_uIcc : b ∈ [[a, b]] :=
mem_Icc.2 ⟨inf_le_right, le_sup_right⟩
#align finset.right_mem_uIcc Finset.right_mem_uIcc
theorem mem_uIcc_of_le (ha : a ≤ x) (hb : x ≤ b) : x ∈ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_uIcc <| mem_Icc.2 ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align finset.mem_uIcc_of_le Finset.mem_uIcc_of_le
theorem mem_uIcc_of_ge (hb : b ≤ x) (ha : x ≤ a) : x ∈ [[a, b]] :=
Icc_subset_uIcc' <| mem_Icc.2 ⟨hb, ha⟩
#align finset.mem_uIcc_of_ge Finset.mem_uIcc_of_ge
theorem uIcc_subset_uIcc (h₁ : a₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]]) (h₂ : b₁ ∈ [[a₂, b₂]]) :
[[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ [[a₂, b₂]] := by
rw [mem_uIcc] at h₁ h₂
exact Icc_subset_Icc (_root_.le_inf h₁.1 h₂.1) (_root_.sup_le h₁.2 h₂.2)
#align finset.uIcc_subset_uIcc Finset.uIcc_subset_uIcc
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 972 | 974 | theorem uIcc_subset_Icc (ha : a₁ ∈ Icc a₂ b₂) (hb : b₁ ∈ Icc a₂ b₂) : [[a₁, b₁]] ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by |
rw [mem_Icc] at ha hb
exact Icc_subset_Icc (_root_.le_inf ha.1 hb.1) (_root_.sup_le ha.2 hb.2)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph
#align_import topology.algebra.group_with_zero from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c10e724be91096453ee3db13862b9fb9a992fef2"
/-!
# Topological group with zero
In this file we define `HasContinuousInv₀` to be a mixin typeclass a type with `Inv` and
`Zero` (e.g., a `GroupWithZero`) such that `fun x ↦ x⁻¹` is continuous at all nonzero points. Any
normed (semi)field has this property. Currently the only example of `HasContinuousInv₀` in
`mathlib` which is not a normed field is the type `NNReal` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0`) of nonnegative real
numbers.
Then we prove lemmas about continuity of `x ↦ x⁻¹` and `f / g` providing dot-style `*.inv₀` and
`*.div` operations on `Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`,
and `Continuous`. As a special case, we provide `*.div_const` operations that require only
`DivInvMonoid` and `ContinuousMul` instances.
All lemmas about `(⁻¹)` use `inv₀` in their names because lemmas without `₀` are used for
`TopologicalGroup`s. We also use `'` in the typeclass name `HasContinuousInv₀` for the sake of
consistency of notation.
On a `GroupWithZero` with continuous multiplication, we also define left and right multiplication
as homeomorphisms.
-/
open Topology Filter Function
/-!
### A `DivInvMonoid` with continuous multiplication
If `G₀` is a `DivInvMonoid` with continuous `(*)`, then `(/y)` is continuous for any `y`. In this
section we prove lemmas that immediately follow from this fact providing `*.div_const` dot-style
operations on `Filter.Tendsto`, `ContinuousAt`, `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn`, and
`Continuous`.
-/
variable {α β G₀ : Type*}
section DivConst
variable [DivInvMonoid G₀] [TopologicalSpace G₀] [ContinuousMul G₀] {f : α → G₀} {s : Set α}
{l : Filter α}
theorem Filter.Tendsto.div_const {x : G₀} (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 x)) (y : G₀) :
Tendsto (fun a => f a / y) l (𝓝 (x / y)) := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul tendsto_const_nhds
#align filter.tendsto.div_const Filter.Tendsto.div_const
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.div_const {a : α} (hf : ContinuousAt f a) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => f x / y) a :=
hf.div_const y
#align continuous_at.div_const ContinuousAt.div_const
nonrec theorem ContinuousWithinAt.div_const {a} (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => f x / y) s a :=
hf.div_const _
#align continuous_within_at.div_const ContinuousWithinAt.div_const
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/GroupWithZero.lean | 69 | 71 | theorem ContinuousOn.div_const (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (y : G₀) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => f x / y) s := by |
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul continuousOn_const
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Encodable
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Span
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
#align_import linear_algebra.finsupp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
/-!
# Properties of the module `α →₀ M`
Given an `R`-module `M`, the `R`-module structure on `α →₀ M` is defined in
`Data.Finsupp.Basic`.
In this file we define `Finsupp.supported s` to be the set `{f : α →₀ M | f.support ⊆ s}`
interpreted as a submodule of `α →₀ M`. We also define `LinearMap` versions of various maps:
* `Finsupp.lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ M`: `Finsupp.single a` as a linear map;
* `Finsupp.lapply a : (ι →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M`: the map `fun f ↦ f a` as a linear map;
* `Finsupp.lsubtypeDomain (s : Set α) : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] (s →₀ M)`: restriction to a subtype as a
linear map;
* `Finsupp.restrictDom`: `Finsupp.filter` as a linear map to `Finsupp.supported s`;
* `Finsupp.lsum`: `Finsupp.sum` or `Finsupp.liftAddHom` as a `LinearMap`;
* `Finsupp.total α M R (v : ι → M)`: sends `l : ι → R` to the linear combination of `v i` with
coefficients `l i`;
* `Finsupp.totalOn`: a restricted version of `Finsupp.total` with domain `Finsupp.supported R R s`
and codomain `Submodule.span R (v '' s)`;
* `Finsupp.supportedEquivFinsupp`: a linear equivalence between the functions `α →₀ M` supported
on `s` and the functions `s →₀ M`;
* `Finsupp.lmapDomain`: a linear map version of `Finsupp.mapDomain`;
* `Finsupp.domLCongr`: a `LinearEquiv` version of `Finsupp.domCongr`;
* `Finsupp.congr`: if the sets `s` and `t` are equivalent, then `supported M R s` is equivalent to
`supported M R t`;
* `Finsupp.lcongr`: a `LinearEquiv`alence between `α →₀ M` and `β →₀ N` constructed using
`e : α ≃ β` and `e' : M ≃ₗ[R] N`.
## Tags
function with finite support, module, linear algebra
-/
noncomputable section
open Set LinearMap Submodule
namespace Finsupp
section SMul
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {R : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*}
theorem smul_sum [Zero β] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribSMul R M] {v : α →₀ β} {c : R} {h : α → β → M} :
c • v.sum h = v.sum fun a b => c • h a b :=
Finset.smul_sum
#align finsupp.smul_sum Finsupp.smul_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_smul_index_linearMap' [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[Module R M₂] {v : α →₀ M} {c : R} {h : α → M →ₗ[R] M₂} :
((c • v).sum fun a => h a) = c • v.sum fun a => h a := by
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index', Finsupp.smul_sum]
· simp only [map_smul]
· intro i
exact (h i).map_zero
#align finsupp.sum_smul_index_linear_map' Finsupp.sum_smul_index_linearMap'
end SMul
section LinearEquivFunOnFinite
variable (R : Type*) {S : Type*} (M : Type*) (α : Type*)
variable [Finite α] [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring R] [Module R M]
/-- Given `Finite α`, `linearEquivFunOnFinite R` is the natural `R`-linear equivalence between
`α →₀ β` and `α → β`. -/
@[simps apply]
noncomputable def linearEquivFunOnFinite : (α →₀ M) ≃ₗ[R] α → M :=
{ equivFunOnFinite with
toFun := (⇑)
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_finite Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivFunOnFinite_single [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (m : M) :
(linearEquivFunOnFinite R M α) (single x m) = Pi.single x m :=
equivFunOnFinite_single x m
#align finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_finite_single Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite_single
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivFunOnFinite_symm_single [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (m : M) :
(linearEquivFunOnFinite R M α).symm (Pi.single x m) = single x m :=
equivFunOnFinite_symm_single x m
#align finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_finite_symm_single Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite_symm_single
@[simp]
theorem linearEquivFunOnFinite_symm_coe (f : α →₀ M) : (linearEquivFunOnFinite R M α).symm f = f :=
(linearEquivFunOnFinite R M α).symm_apply_apply f
#align finsupp.linear_equiv_fun_on_finite_symm_coe Finsupp.linearEquivFunOnFinite_symm_coe
end LinearEquivFunOnFinite
section LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique
variable (R : Type*) {S : Type*} (M : Type*)
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring R] [Module R M]
variable (α : Type*) [Unique α]
/-- If `α` has a unique term, then the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ M` is
`R`-linearly equivalent to `M`. -/
noncomputable def LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique : (α →₀ M) ≃ₗ[R] M :=
{ Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique α M) with
map_add' := fun _ _ => rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align finsupp.linear_equiv.finsupp_unique Finsupp.LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique_apply (f : α →₀ M) :
LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique R M α f = f default :=
rfl
#align finsupp.linear_equiv.finsupp_unique_apply Finsupp.LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique_apply
variable {α}
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique_symm_apply [Unique α] (m : M) :
(LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique R M α).symm m = Finsupp.single default m := by
ext; simp [LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique, Equiv.funUnique, single, Pi.single,
equivFunOnFinite, Function.update]
#align finsupp.linear_equiv.finsupp_unique_symm_apply Finsupp.LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique_symm_apply
end LinearEquiv.finsuppUnique
variable {α : Type*} {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*} {R : Type*} {S : Type*}
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P]
/-- Interpret `Finsupp.single a` as a linear map. -/
def lsingle (a : α) : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M :=
{ Finsupp.singleAddHom a with map_smul' := fun _ _ => (smul_single _ _ _).symm }
#align finsupp.lsingle Finsupp.lsingle
/-- Two `R`-linear maps from `Finsupp X M` which agree on each `single x y` agree everywhere. -/
theorem lhom_ext ⦃φ ψ : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] N⦄ (h : ∀ a b, φ (single a b) = ψ (single a b)) : φ = ψ :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext h
#align finsupp.lhom_ext Finsupp.lhom_ext
/-- Two `R`-linear maps from `Finsupp X M` which agree on each `single x y` agree everywhere.
We formulate this fact using equality of linear maps `φ.comp (lsingle a)` and `ψ.comp (lsingle a)`
so that the `ext` tactic can apply a type-specific extensionality lemma to prove equality of these
maps. E.g., if `M = R`, then it suffices to verify `φ (single a 1) = ψ (single a 1)`. -/
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `LinearMap.ext`.
@[ext high]
theorem lhom_ext' ⦃φ ψ : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] N⦄ (h : ∀ a, φ.comp (lsingle a) = ψ.comp (lsingle a)) :
φ = ψ :=
lhom_ext fun a => LinearMap.congr_fun (h a)
#align finsupp.lhom_ext' Finsupp.lhom_ext'
/-- Interpret `fun f : α →₀ M ↦ f a` as a linear map. -/
def lapply (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M :=
{ Finsupp.applyAddHom a with map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align finsupp.lapply Finsupp.lapply
section CompatibleSMul
variable (R S M N ι : Type*)
variable [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module S M] [Module S N]
instance _root_.LinearMap.CompatibleSMul.finsupp_dom [SMulZeroClass R M] [DistribSMul R N]
[LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M N R S] : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul (ι →₀ M) N R S where
map_smul f r m := by
conv_rhs => rw [← sum_single m, map_finsupp_sum, smul_sum]
erw [← sum_single (r • m), sum_mapRange_index single_zero, map_finsupp_sum]
congr; ext i m; exact (f.comp <| lsingle i).map_smul_of_tower r m
instance _root_.LinearMap.CompatibleSMul.finsupp_cod [SMul R M] [SMulZeroClass R N]
[LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M N R S] : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul M (ι →₀ N) R S where
map_smul f r m := by ext i; apply ((lapply i).comp f).map_smul_of_tower
end CompatibleSMul
/-- Forget that a function is finitely supported.
This is the linear version of `Finsupp.toFun`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeFun : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_add' x y := by
ext
simp
map_smul' x y := by
ext
simp
#align finsupp.lcoe_fun Finsupp.lcoeFun
section LSubtypeDomain
variable (s : Set α)
/-- Interpret `Finsupp.subtypeDomain s` as a linear map. -/
def lsubtypeDomain : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] s →₀ M where
toFun := subtypeDomain fun x => x ∈ s
map_add' _ _ := subtypeDomain_add
map_smul' _ _ := ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.lsubtype_domain Finsupp.lsubtypeDomain
theorem lsubtypeDomain_apply (f : α →₀ M) :
(lsubtypeDomain s : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] s →₀ M) f = subtypeDomain (fun x => x ∈ s) f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lsubtype_domain_apply Finsupp.lsubtypeDomain_apply
end LSubtypeDomain
@[simp]
theorem lsingle_apply (a : α) (b : M) : (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) b = single a b :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lsingle_apply Finsupp.lsingle_apply
@[simp]
theorem lapply_apply (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : (lapply a : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M) f = f a :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lapply_apply Finsupp.lapply_apply
@[simp]
theorem lapply_comp_lsingle_same (a : α) : lapply a ∘ₗ lsingle a = (.id : M →ₗ[R] M) := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem lapply_comp_lsingle_of_ne (a a' : α) (h : a ≠ a') :
lapply a ∘ₗ lsingle a' = (0 : M →ₗ[R] M) := by ext; simp [h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem ker_lsingle (a : α) : ker (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot_of_injective (single_injective a)
#align finsupp.ker_lsingle Finsupp.ker_lsingle
theorem lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply (s t : Set α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
⨆ a ∈ s, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) ≤
⨅ a ∈ t, ker (lapply a : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M) := by
refine iSup_le fun a₁ => iSup_le fun h₁ => range_le_iff_comap.2 ?_
simp only [(ker_comp _ _).symm, eq_top_iff, SetLike.le_def, mem_ker, comap_iInf, mem_iInf]
intro b _ a₂ h₂
have : a₁ ≠ a₂ := fun eq => h.le_bot ⟨h₁, eq.symm ▸ h₂⟩
exact single_eq_of_ne this
#align finsupp.lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply Finsupp.lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply
theorem iInf_ker_lapply_le_bot : ⨅ a, ker (lapply a : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] M) ≤ ⊥ := by
simp only [SetLike.le_def, mem_iInf, mem_ker, mem_bot, lapply_apply]
exact fun a h => Finsupp.ext h
#align finsupp.infi_ker_lapply_le_bot Finsupp.iInf_ker_lapply_le_bot
theorem iSup_lsingle_range : ⨆ a, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) = ⊤ := by
refine eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 fun f _ => ?_
rw [← sum_single f]
exact sum_mem fun a _ => Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem a ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align finsupp.supr_lsingle_range Finsupp.iSup_lsingle_range
theorem disjoint_lsingle_lsingle (s t : Set α) (hs : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (⨆ a ∈ s, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M))
(⨆ a ∈ t, LinearMap.range (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M)) := by
-- Porting note: 2 placeholders are added to prevent timeout.
refine
(Disjoint.mono
(lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply s sᶜ ?_)
(lsingle_range_le_ker_lapply t tᶜ ?_))
?_
· apply disjoint_compl_right
· apply disjoint_compl_right
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
refine le_trans (le_iInf fun i => ?_) iInf_ker_lapply_le_bot
classical
by_cases his : i ∈ s
· by_cases hit : i ∈ t
· exact (hs.le_bot ⟨his, hit⟩).elim
exact inf_le_of_right_le (iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le _ hit)
exact inf_le_of_left_le (iInf_le_of_le i <| iInf_le _ his)
#align finsupp.disjoint_lsingle_lsingle Finsupp.disjoint_lsingle_lsingle
theorem span_single_image (s : Set M) (a : α) :
Submodule.span R (single a '' s) = (Submodule.span R s).map (lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) := by
rw [← span_image]; rfl
#align finsupp.span_single_image Finsupp.span_single_image
variable (M R)
/-- `Finsupp.supported M R s` is the `R`-submodule of all `p : α →₀ M` such that `p.support ⊆ s`. -/
def supported (s : Set α) : Submodule R (α →₀ M) where
carrier := { p | ↑p.support ⊆ s }
add_mem' {p q} hp hq := by
classical
refine Subset.trans (Subset.trans (Finset.coe_subset.2 support_add) ?_) (union_subset hp hq)
rw [Finset.coe_union]
zero_mem' := by
simp only [subset_def, Finset.mem_coe, Set.mem_setOf_eq, mem_support_iff, zero_apply]
intro h ha
exact (ha rfl).elim
smul_mem' a p hp := Subset.trans (Finset.coe_subset.2 support_smul) hp
#align finsupp.supported Finsupp.supported
variable {M}
theorem mem_supported {s : Set α} (p : α →₀ M) : p ∈ supported M R s ↔ ↑p.support ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finsupp.mem_supported Finsupp.mem_supported
theorem mem_supported' {s : Set α} (p : α →₀ M) :
p ∈ supported M R s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, p x = 0 := by
haveI := Classical.decPred fun x : α => x ∈ s; simp [mem_supported, Set.subset_def, not_imp_comm]
#align finsupp.mem_supported' Finsupp.mem_supported'
theorem mem_supported_support (p : α →₀ M) : p ∈ Finsupp.supported M R (p.support : Set α) := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_supported]
#align finsupp.mem_supported_support Finsupp.mem_supported_support
theorem single_mem_supported {s : Set α} {a : α} (b : M) (h : a ∈ s) :
single a b ∈ supported M R s :=
Set.Subset.trans support_single_subset (Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff.2 h)
#align finsupp.single_mem_supported Finsupp.single_mem_supported
theorem supported_eq_span_single (s : Set α) :
supported R R s = span R ((fun i => single i 1) '' s) := by
refine (span_eq_of_le _ ?_ (SetLike.le_def.2 fun l hl => ?_)).symm
· rintro _ ⟨_, hp, rfl⟩
exact single_mem_supported R 1 hp
· rw [← l.sum_single]
refine sum_mem fun i il => ?_
-- Porting note: Needed to help this convert quite a bit replacing underscores
convert smul_mem (M := α →₀ R) (x := single i 1) (span R ((fun i => single i 1) '' s)) (l i) ?_
· simp [span]
· apply subset_span
apply Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (hl il)
#align finsupp.supported_eq_span_single Finsupp.supported_eq_span_single
variable (M)
/-- Interpret `Finsupp.filter s` as a linear map from `α →₀ M` to `supported M R s`. -/
def restrictDom (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] supported M R s :=
LinearMap.codRestrict _
{ toFun := filter (· ∈ s)
map_add' := fun _ _ => filter_add
map_smul' := fun _ _ => filter_smul } fun l =>
(mem_supported' _ _).2 fun _ => filter_apply_neg (· ∈ s) l
#align finsupp.restrict_dom Finsupp.restrictDom
variable {M R}
section
@[simp]
theorem restrictDom_apply (s : Set α) (l : α →₀ M) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]:
(restrictDom M R s l : α →₀ M) = Finsupp.filter (· ∈ s) l := rfl
#align finsupp.restrict_dom_apply Finsupp.restrictDom_apply
end
theorem restrictDom_comp_subtype (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
(restrictDom M R s).comp (Submodule.subtype _) = LinearMap.id := by
ext l a
by_cases h : a ∈ s <;> simp [h]
exact ((mem_supported' R l.1).1 l.2 a h).symm
#align finsupp.restrict_dom_comp_subtype Finsupp.restrictDom_comp_subtype
theorem range_restrictDom (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
LinearMap.range (restrictDom M R s) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 <|
Function.RightInverse.surjective <| LinearMap.congr_fun (restrictDom_comp_subtype s)
#align finsupp.range_restrict_dom Finsupp.range_restrictDom
theorem supported_mono {s t : Set α} (st : s ⊆ t) : supported M R s ≤ supported M R t := fun _ h =>
Set.Subset.trans h st
#align finsupp.supported_mono Finsupp.supported_mono
@[simp]
theorem supported_empty : supported M R (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 fun l h => (Submodule.mem_bot R).2 <| by ext; simp_all [mem_supported']
#align finsupp.supported_empty Finsupp.supported_empty
@[simp]
theorem supported_univ : supported M R (Set.univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun _ _ => Set.subset_univ _
#align finsupp.supported_univ Finsupp.supported_univ
theorem supported_iUnion {δ : Type*} (s : δ → Set α) :
supported M R (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, supported M R (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => supported_mono <| Set.subset_iUnion _ _)
haveI := Classical.decPred fun x => x ∈ ⋃ i, s i
suffices
LinearMap.range ((Submodule.subtype _).comp (restrictDom M R (⋃ i, s i))) ≤
⨆ i, supported M R (s i) by
rwa [LinearMap.range_comp, range_restrictDom, Submodule.map_top, range_subtype] at this
rw [range_le_iff_comap, eq_top_iff]
rintro l ⟨⟩
-- Porting note: Was ported as `induction l using Finsupp.induction`
refine Finsupp.induction l ?_ ?_
· exact zero_mem _
· refine fun x a l _ _ => add_mem ?_
by_cases h : ∃ i, x ∈ s i <;> simp [h]
cases' h with i hi
exact le_iSup (fun i => supported M R (s i)) i (single_mem_supported R _ hi)
#align finsupp.supported_Union Finsupp.supported_iUnion
theorem supported_union (s t : Set α) :
supported M R (s ∪ t) = supported M R s ⊔ supported M R t := by
erw [Set.union_eq_iUnion, supported_iUnion, iSup_bool_eq]; rfl
#align finsupp.supported_union Finsupp.supported_union
theorem supported_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Set α) :
supported M R (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, supported M R (s i) :=
Submodule.ext fun x => by simp [mem_supported, subset_iInter_iff]
#align finsupp.supported_Inter Finsupp.supported_iInter
theorem supported_inter (s t : Set α) :
supported M R (s ∩ t) = supported M R s ⊓ supported M R t := by
rw [Set.inter_eq_iInter, supported_iInter, iInf_bool_eq]; rfl
#align finsupp.supported_inter Finsupp.supported_inter
theorem disjoint_supported_supported {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) :
Disjoint (supported M R s) (supported M R t) :=
disjoint_iff.2 <| by rw [← supported_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.1 h, supported_empty]
#align finsupp.disjoint_supported_supported Finsupp.disjoint_supported_supported
theorem disjoint_supported_supported_iff [Nontrivial M] {s t : Set α} :
Disjoint (supported M R s) (supported M R t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
refine ⟨fun h => Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun x hx1 hx2 => ?_, disjoint_supported_supported⟩
rcases exists_ne (0 : M) with ⟨y, hy⟩
have := h.le_bot ⟨single_mem_supported R y hx1, single_mem_supported R y hx2⟩
rw [mem_bot, single_eq_zero] at this
exact hy this
#align finsupp.disjoint_supported_supported_iff Finsupp.disjoint_supported_supported_iff
/-- Interpret `Finsupp.restrictSupportEquiv` as a linear equivalence between
`supported M R s` and `s →₀ M`. -/
def supportedEquivFinsupp (s : Set α) : supported M R s ≃ₗ[R] s →₀ M := by
let F : supported M R s ≃ (s →₀ M) := restrictSupportEquiv s M
refine F.toLinearEquiv ?_
have :
(F : supported M R s → ↥s →₀ M) =
(lsubtypeDomain s : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] s →₀ M).comp (Submodule.subtype (supported M R s)) :=
rfl
rw [this]
exact LinearMap.isLinear _
#align finsupp.supported_equiv_finsupp Finsupp.supportedEquivFinsupp
section LSum
variable (S)
variable [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
/-- Lift a family of linear maps `M →ₗ[R] N` indexed by `x : α` to a linear map from `α →₀ M` to
`N` using `Finsupp.sum`. This is an upgraded version of `Finsupp.liftAddHom`.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used.
-/
def lsum : (α → M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[S] (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] N where
toFun F :=
{ toFun := fun d => d.sum fun i => F i
map_add' := (liftAddHom (α := α) (M := M) (N := N) fun x => (F x).toAddMonoidHom).map_add
map_smul' := fun c f => by simp [sum_smul_index', smul_sum] }
invFun F x := F.comp (lsingle x)
left_inv F := by
ext x y
simp
right_inv F := by
ext x y
simp
map_add' F G := by
ext x y
simp
map_smul' F G := by
ext x y
simp
#align finsupp.lsum Finsupp.lsum
@[simp]
theorem coe_lsum (f : α → M →ₗ[R] N) : (lsum S f : (α →₀ M) → N) = fun d => d.sum fun i => f i :=
rfl
#align finsupp.coe_lsum Finsupp.coe_lsum
theorem lsum_apply (f : α → M →ₗ[R] N) (l : α →₀ M) : Finsupp.lsum S f l = l.sum fun b => f b :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lsum_apply Finsupp.lsum_apply
theorem lsum_single (f : α → M →ₗ[R] N) (i : α) (m : M) :
Finsupp.lsum S f (Finsupp.single i m) = f i m :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index (f i).map_zero
#align finsupp.lsum_single Finsupp.lsum_single
@[simp] theorem lsum_comp_lsingle (f : α → M →ₗ[R] N) (i : α) :
Finsupp.lsum S f ∘ₗ lsingle i = f i := by ext; simp
theorem lsum_symm_apply (f : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] N) (x : α) : (lsum S).symm f x = f.comp (lsingle x) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lsum_symm_apply Finsupp.lsum_symm_apply
end LSum
section
variable (M) (R) (X : Type*) (S)
variable [Module S M] [SMulCommClass R S M]
/-- A slight rearrangement from `lsum` gives us
the bijection underlying the free-forgetful adjunction for R-modules.
-/
noncomputable def lift : (X → M) ≃+ ((X →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M) :=
(AddEquiv.arrowCongr (Equiv.refl X) (ringLmapEquivSelf R ℕ M).toAddEquiv.symm).trans
(lsum _ : _ ≃ₗ[ℕ] _).toAddEquiv
#align finsupp.lift Finsupp.lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_symm_apply (f) (x) : ((lift M R X).symm f) x = f (single x 1) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lift_symm_apply Finsupp.lift_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem lift_apply (f) (g) : ((lift M R X) f) g = g.sum fun x r => r • f x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lift_apply Finsupp.lift_apply
/-- Given compatible `S` and `R`-module structures on `M` and a type `X`, the set of functions
`X → M` is `S`-linearly equivalent to the `R`-linear maps from the free `R`-module
on `X` to `M`. -/
noncomputable def llift : (X → M) ≃ₗ[S] (X →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M :=
{ lift M R X with
map_smul' := by
intros
dsimp
ext
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, lsingle_apply, lift_apply, Pi.smul_apply,
sum_single_index, zero_smul, one_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply] }
#align finsupp.llift Finsupp.llift
@[simp]
theorem llift_apply (f : X → M) (x : X →₀ R) : llift M R S X f x = lift M R X f x :=
rfl
#align finsupp.llift_apply Finsupp.llift_apply
@[simp]
theorem llift_symm_apply (f : (X →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M) (x : X) :
(llift M R S X).symm f x = f (single x 1) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.llift_symm_apply Finsupp.llift_symm_apply
end
section LMapDomain
variable {α' : Type*} {α'' : Type*} (M R)
/-- Interpret `Finsupp.mapDomain` as a linear map. -/
def lmapDomain (f : α → α') : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α' →₀ M where
toFun := mapDomain f
map_add' _ _ := mapDomain_add
map_smul' := mapDomain_smul
#align finsupp.lmap_domain Finsupp.lmapDomain
@[simp]
theorem lmapDomain_apply (f : α → α') (l : α →₀ M) :
(lmapDomain M R f : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α' →₀ M) l = mapDomain f l :=
rfl
#align finsupp.lmap_domain_apply Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply
@[simp]
theorem lmapDomain_id : (lmapDomain M R _root_.id : (α →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => mapDomain_id
#align finsupp.lmap_domain_id Finsupp.lmapDomain_id
theorem lmapDomain_comp (f : α → α') (g : α' → α'') :
lmapDomain M R (g ∘ f) = (lmapDomain M R g).comp (lmapDomain M R f) :=
LinearMap.ext fun _ => mapDomain_comp
#align finsupp.lmap_domain_comp Finsupp.lmapDomain_comp
theorem supported_comap_lmapDomain (f : α → α') (s : Set α') :
supported M R (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (supported M R s).comap (lmapDomain M R f) := by
classical
intro l (hl : (l.support : Set α) ⊆ f ⁻¹' s)
show ↑(mapDomain f l).support ⊆ s
rw [← Set.image_subset_iff, ← Finset.coe_image] at hl
exact Set.Subset.trans mapDomain_support hl
#align finsupp.supported_comap_lmap_domain Finsupp.supported_comap_lmapDomain
theorem lmapDomain_supported (f : α → α') (s : Set α) :
(supported M R s).map (lmapDomain M R f) = supported M R (f '' s) := by
classical
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· simp [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]
refine
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
le_trans (supported_mono <| Set.subset_preimage_image _ _)
(supported_comap_lmapDomain M R _ _))
?_
intro l hl
refine ⟨(lmapDomain M R (Function.invFunOn f s) : (α' →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α →₀ M) l, fun x hx => ?_, ?_⟩
· rcases Finset.mem_image.1 (mapDomain_support hx) with ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩
exact Function.invFunOn_mem (by simpa using hl hc)
· rw [← LinearMap.comp_apply, ← lmapDomain_comp]
refine (mapDomain_congr fun c hc => ?_).trans mapDomain_id
exact Function.invFunOn_eq (by simpa using hl hc)
#align finsupp.lmap_domain_supported Finsupp.lmapDomain_supported
theorem lmapDomain_disjoint_ker (f : α → α') {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, f a = f b → a = b) :
Disjoint (supported M R s) (ker (lmapDomain M R f)) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro l ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, lmapDomain_apply, mapDomain] at h₂
simp; ext x
haveI := Classical.decPred fun x => x ∈ s
by_cases xs : x ∈ s
· have : Finsupp.sum l (fun a => Finsupp.single (f a)) (f x) = 0 := by
rw [h₂]
rfl
rw [Finsupp.sum_apply, Finsupp.sum_eq_single x, single_eq_same] at this
· simpa
· intro y hy xy
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_supported, subset_def, Finset.mem_coe, mem_support_iff] at h₁
simp [mt (H _ (h₁ _ hy) _ xs) xy]
· simp (config := { contextual := true })
· by_contra h
exact xs (h₁ <| Finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align finsupp.lmap_domain_disjoint_ker Finsupp.lmapDomain_disjoint_ker
end LMapDomain
section LComapDomain
variable {β : Type*}
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a proof `hf` that `f` is injective, `lcomapDomain f hf` is the linear map
sending `l : β →₀ M` to the finitely supported function from `α` to `M` given by composing
`l` with `f`.
This is the linear version of `Finsupp.comapDomain`. -/
def lcomapDomain (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) : (β →₀ M) →ₗ[R] α →₀ M where
toFun l := Finsupp.comapDomain f l hf.injOn
map_add' x y := by ext; simp
map_smul' c x := by ext; simp
#align finsupp.lcomap_domain Finsupp.lcomapDomain
end LComapDomain
section Total
variable (α) (M) (R)
variable {α' : Type*} {M' : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M'] (v : α → M) {v' : α' → M'}
/-- Interprets (l : α →₀ R) as linear combination of the elements in the family (v : α → M) and
evaluates this linear combination. -/
protected def total : (α →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M :=
Finsupp.lsum ℕ fun i => LinearMap.id.smulRight (v i)
#align finsupp.total Finsupp.total
variable {α M v}
theorem total_apply (l : α →₀ R) : Finsupp.total α M R v l = l.sum fun i a => a • v i :=
rfl
#align finsupp.total_apply Finsupp.total_apply
theorem total_apply_of_mem_supported {l : α →₀ R} {s : Finset α}
(hs : l ∈ supported R R (↑s : Set α)) : Finsupp.total α M R v l = s.sum fun i => l i • v i :=
Finset.sum_subset hs fun x _ hxg =>
show l x • v x = 0 by rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hxg, zero_smul]
#align finsupp.total_apply_of_mem_supported Finsupp.total_apply_of_mem_supported
@[simp]
theorem total_single (c : R) (a : α) : Finsupp.total α M R v (single a c) = c • v a := by
simp [total_apply, sum_single_index]
#align finsupp.total_single Finsupp.total_single
theorem total_zero_apply (x : α →₀ R) : (Finsupp.total α M R 0) x = 0 := by
simp [Finsupp.total_apply]
#align finsupp.total_zero_apply Finsupp.total_zero_apply
variable (α M)
@[simp]
theorem total_zero : Finsupp.total α M R 0 = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext (total_zero_apply R)
#align finsupp.total_zero Finsupp.total_zero
variable {α M}
theorem apply_total (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (v) (l : α →₀ R) :
f (Finsupp.total α M R v l) = Finsupp.total α M' R (f ∘ v) l := by
apply Finsupp.induction_linear l <;> simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align finsupp.apply_total Finsupp.apply_total
theorem apply_total_id (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (l : M →₀ R) :
f (Finsupp.total M M R _root_.id l) = Finsupp.total M M' R f l :=
apply_total ..
theorem total_unique [Unique α] (l : α →₀ R) (v) :
Finsupp.total α M R v l = l default • v default := by rw [← total_single, ← unique_single l]
#align finsupp.total_unique Finsupp.total_unique
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Finsupp.lean | 705 | 709 | theorem total_surjective (h : Function.Surjective v) :
Function.Surjective (Finsupp.total α M R v) := by |
intro x
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := h x
exact ⟨Finsupp.single y 1, by simp [hy]⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Lower Lebesgue integral for `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions
We define the lower Lebesgue integral of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function.
## Notation
We introduce the following notation for the lower Lebesgue integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
* `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to a measure `μ`;
* `∫⁻ x, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to the canonical measure
`volume` on `α`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to a measure `μ`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to the canonical measure `volume`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`.
-/
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- The **lower Lebesgue integral** of a function `f` with respect to a measure `μ`. -/
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫⁻ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫⁻ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
/-- For any function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, there exists a measurable function `g ≤ f` with the same
integral. -/
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
/-- `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ` is defined as the supremum of integrals of simple functions
`φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞` such that `φ ≤ f`. This lemma says that it suffices to take
functions `φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0`. -/
theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_nnreal
theorem exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0,
(∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x) ∧
∀ ψ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0, (∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x) → (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral μ < ε := by
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal] at h
have := ENNReal.lt_add_right h hε
erw [ENNReal.biSup_add] at this <;> [skip; exact ⟨0, fun x => zero_le _⟩]
simp_rw [lt_iSup_iff, iSup_lt_iff, iSup_le_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨φ, hle : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x, b, hbφ, hb⟩
refine ⟨φ, hle, fun ψ hψ => ?_⟩
have : (map (↑) φ).lintegral μ ≠ ∞ := ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (by exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) φ hle)
rw [← ENNReal.add_lt_add_iff_left this, ← add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine (hb _ fun x => le_trans ?_ (max_le (hle x) (hψ x))).trans_lt hbφ
norm_cast
simp only [add_apply, sub_apply, add_tsub_eq_max]
rfl
#align measure_theory.exists_simple_func_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos MeasureTheory.exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos
theorem iSup_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iSup_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_le
theorem iSup₂_lintegral_le {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (i) (j), ∫⁻ a, f i j a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, ⨆ (i) (j), f i j a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).le_map_iSup₂ f with a
simp only [iSup_apply]
#align measure_theory.supr₂_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.iSup₂_lintegral_le
theorem le_iInf_lintegral {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ i, f i a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [← iInf_apply]
exact (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf_le
#align measure_theory.le_infi_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf_lintegral
theorem le_iInf₂_lintegral {ι : Sort*} {ι' : ι → Sort*} (f : ∀ i, ι' i → α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), f i h a ∂μ ≤ ⨅ (i) (h : ι' i), ∫⁻ a, f i h a ∂μ := by
convert (monotone_lintegral μ).map_iInf₂_le f with a
simp only [iInf_apply]
#align measure_theory.le_infi₂_lintegral MeasureTheory.le_iInf₂_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f a ≤ g a) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null h with ⟨t, hts, ht, ht0⟩
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ t := measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 ht0
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hfs => le_iSup_of_le (s.restrict tᶜ) <| le_iSup_of_le ?_ ?_
· intro a
by_cases h : a ∈ t <;>
simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, h, not_true, not_false_eq_true,
indicator_of_not_mem, zero_le, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact le_trans (hfs a) (_root_.by_contradiction fun hnfg => h (hts hnfg))
· refine le_of_eq (SimpleFunc.lintegral_congr <| this.mono fun a hnt => ?_)
by_cases hat : a ∈ t <;> simp only [restrict_apply s ht.compl, mem_compl_iff, hat, not_true,
not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_not_mem, not_false_eq_true, indicator_of_mem]
exact (hnt hat).elim
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff <| measurableSet_le hf hg).2 hfg
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono_ae MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono_ae
theorem set_lintegral_mono {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae hf hg (ae_of_all _ hfg)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_mono
theorem set_lintegral_mono_ae' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| (ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 hfg
theorem set_lintegral_mono' {s : Set α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
set_lintegral_mono_ae' hs (ae_of_all _ hfg)
theorem set_lintegral_le_lintegral (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' Measure.restrict_le_self le_rfl
theorem lintegral_congr_ae {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
le_antisymm (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.le) (lintegral_mono_ae <| h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr_ae
theorem lintegral_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simp only [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s t : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by rw [Measure.restrict_congr_set h]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr
theorem set_lintegral_congr_fun {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
rw [EventuallyEq]
rwa [ae_restrict_iff' hs]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_congr_fun MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_congr_fun
theorem lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm (f : α → ℝ) :
∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
refine lintegral_mono fun x => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact le_abs_self (f x)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_of_real_le_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h_nonneg] with x hx
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg hx, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal hx]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (h_nonneg : 0 ≤ f) :
∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg (Filter.eventually_of_forall h_nonneg)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg
/-- **Monotone convergence theorem** -- sometimes called **Beppo-Levi convergence**.
See `lintegral_iSup_directed` for a more general form. -/
theorem lintegral_iSup {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_mono : Monotone f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
set c : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞ := (↑)
set F := fun a : α => ⨆ n, f n a
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_lintegral_le _)
rw [lintegral_eq_nnreal]
refine iSup_le fun s => iSup_le fun hsf => ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le fun a ha => ?_
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 ha with ⟨r, rfl, _⟩
have ha : r < 1 := ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 ha
let rs := s.map fun a => r * a
have eq_rs : rs.map c = (const α r : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) * map c s := rfl
have eq : ∀ p, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} = ⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {p} ∩ { a | p ≤ f n a } := by
intro p
rw [← inter_iUnion]; nth_rw 1 [← inter_univ (map c rs ⁻¹' {p})]
refine Set.ext fun x => and_congr_right fun hx => true_iff_iff.2 ?_
by_cases p_eq : p = 0
· simp [p_eq]
simp only [coe_map, mem_preimage, Function.comp_apply, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
subst hx
have : r * s x ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, ← ENNReal.coe_eq_zero]
have : s x ≠ 0 := right_ne_zero_of_mul this
have : (rs.map c) x < ⨆ n : ℕ, f n x := by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 ?_) (hsf x)
suffices r * s x < 1 * s x by simpa
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
rcases lt_iSup_iff.1 this with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, le_of_lt hi⟩
have mono : ∀ r : ℝ≥0∞, Monotone fun n => rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a } := by
intro r i j h
refine inter_subset_inter_right _ ?_
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf]
intro x hx
exact le_trans hx (h_mono h x)
have h_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet {a : α | map c rs a ≤ f n a} := fun n =>
measurableSet_le (SimpleFunc.measurable _) (hf n)
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) * (s.map c).lintegral μ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r}) := by
rw [← const_mul_lintegral, eq_rs, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (⋃ n, rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
simp only [(eq _).symm]
_ = ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, ⨆ n, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) :=
(Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x _ => by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup (mono x).directed_le, ENNReal.mul_iSup])
_ = ⨆ n, ∑ r ∈ (rs.map c).range, r * μ (rs.map c ⁻¹' {r} ∩ { a | r ≤ f n a }) := by
refine ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat fun p i j h ↦ ?_
gcongr _ * μ ?_
exact mono p h
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ((rs.map c).restrict { a | (rs.map c) a ≤ f n a }).lintegral μ := by
gcongr with n
rw [restrict_lintegral _ (h_meas n)]
refine le_of_eq (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun r _ => ?_)
congr 2 with a
refine and_congr_right ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true })
_ ≤ ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
gcongr with n a
simp only [map_apply] at h_meas
simp only [coe_map, restrict_apply _ (h_meas _), (· ∘ ·)]
exact indicator_apply_le id
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup
/-- Monotone convergence theorem -- sometimes called Beppo-Levi convergence. Version with
ae_measurable functions. -/
theorem lintegral_iSup' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Monotone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_mono
have h_ae_seq_mono : Monotone (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false, le_rfl]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
simp_rw [iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_iSup (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_mono]
congr with n
exact lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp n)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr' MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup'
/-- Monotone convergence theorem expressed with limits -/
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n => f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| F x)) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ) := by
have : Monotone fun n => ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij =>
lintegral_mono_ae (h_mono.mono fun x hx => hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup this
rw [← lintegral_iSup' hf h_mono]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_mono, h_tendsto] with _ hx_mono hx_tendsto using
tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iSup hx_mono)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone MeasureTheory.lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone
theorem lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; ext a; rw [iSup_eapprox_apply f hf]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_iSup
· measurability
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox f h
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
congr; ext n; rw [(eapprox f n).lintegral_eq_lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_supr_eapprox_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. This lemma states this fact in terms of `ε` and `δ`. -/
theorem exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(hε : ε ≠ 0) : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ s, μ s < δ → ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ε := by
rcases exists_between (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hε) with ⟨ε₂, hε₂0, hε₂ε⟩
rcases exists_between hε₂0 with ⟨ε₁, hε₁0, hε₁₂⟩
rcases exists_simpleFunc_forall_lintegral_sub_lt_of_pos h hε₁0.ne' with ⟨φ, _, hφ⟩
rcases φ.exists_forall_le with ⟨C, hC⟩
use (ε₂ - ε₁) / C, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨(tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hε₁₂).ne', ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
refine fun s hs => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hε₂ε
simp only [lintegral_eq_nnreal, iSup_le_iff]
intro ψ hψ
calc
(map (↑) ψ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) ≤
(map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + (map (↑) (ψ - φ)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.map_add @ENNReal.coe_add]
refine SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x => ?_) le_rfl
simp only [add_tsub_eq_max, le_max_right, coe_map, Function.comp_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add,
SimpleFunc.coe_sub, Pi.add_apply, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.coe_max (φ x) (ψ x)]
_ ≤ (map (↑) φ).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
refine le_trans ?_ (hφ _ hψ).le
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_rfl Measure.restrict_le_self
_ ≤ (SimpleFunc.const α (C : ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral (μ.restrict s) + ε₁ := by
gcongr
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hC x)) le_rfl
_ = C * μ s + ε₁ := by
simp only [← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, coe_const, lintegral_const,
Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter, Function.const]
_ ≤ C * ((ε₂ - ε₁) / C) + ε₁ := by gcongr
_ ≤ ε₂ - ε₁ + ε₁ := by gcongr; apply mul_div_le
_ = ε₂ := tsub_add_cancel_of_le hε₁₂.le
#align measure_theory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt MeasureTheory.exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem tendsto_set_lintegral_zero {ι} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) {l : Filter ι}
{s : ι → Set α} (hl : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [ENNReal.nhds_zero, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Iio,
← pos_iff_ne_zero] at hl ⊢
intro ε ε0
rcases exists_pos_set_lintegral_lt_of_measure_lt h ε0.ne' with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
exact (hl δ δ0).mono fun i => hδ _
#align measure_theory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.tendsto_set_lintegral_zero
/-- The sum of the lower Lebesgue integrals of two functions is less than or equal to the integral
of their sum. The other inequality needs one of these functions to be (a.e.-)measurable. -/
theorem le_lintegral_add (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
refine ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le' (p := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ f)
(q := fun h : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞ => h ≤ g) ⟨0, zero_le f⟩ ⟨0, zero_le g⟩ fun f' hf' g' hg' => ?_
exact le_iSup₂_of_le (f' + g') (add_le_add hf' hg') (add_lintegral _ _).ge
#align measure_theory.le_lintegral_add MeasureTheory.le_lintegral_add
-- Use stronger lemmas `lintegral_add_left`/`lintegral_add_right` instead
theorem lintegral_add_aux {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ =
∫⁻ a, (⨆ n, (eapprox f n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
simp only [iSup_eapprox_apply, hf, hg]
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (eapprox f n + eapprox g n : α → ℝ≥0∞) a ∂μ := by
congr; funext a
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone]
· simp only [Pi.add_apply]
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
· intro i j h
exact monotone_eapprox _ h a
_ = ⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ + (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.add_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, SimpleFunc.coe_add]
· measurability
· intro i j h a
dsimp
gcongr <;> exact monotone_eapprox _ h _
_ = (⨆ n, (eapprox f n).lintegral μ) + ⨆ n, (eapprox g n).lintegral μ := by
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone ?_ ?_).symm <;>
· intro i j h
exact SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono (monotone_eapprox _ h) le_rfl
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_aux MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_aux
/-- If `f g : α → ℝ≥0∞` are two functions and one of them is (a.e.) measurable, then the Lebesgue
integral of `f + g` equals the sum of integrals. This lemma assumes that `f` is integrable, see also
`MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right` and primed versions of these lemmas. -/
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_left {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_lintegral_add _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ fun a => f a + g a with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, φ a ∂μ := hφ_eq
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a + (φ a - f a) ∂μ := lintegral_mono fun a => le_add_tsub
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, φ a - f a ∂μ := lintegral_add_aux hf (hφm.sub hf)
_ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
add_le_add_left (lintegral_mono fun a => tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| hφ_le a) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left
theorem lintegral_add_left' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk, ← lintegral_add_left hf.measurable_mk,
lintegral_congr_ae (hf.ae_eq_mk.add (ae_eq_refl g))]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_left' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left'
theorem lintegral_add_right' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using lintegral_add_left' hg f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right' MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right'
/-- If `f g : α → ℝ≥0∞` are two functions and one of them is (a.e.) measurable, then the Lebesgue
integral of `f + g` equals the sum of integrals. This lemma assumes that `g` is integrable, see also
`MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_left` and primed versions of these lemmas. -/
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_right (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' f hg.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_right
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂c • μ = c * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_smul, ENNReal.mul_iSup, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_smul_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_smul_measure
lemma set_lintegral_smul_measure (c : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂(c • μ) = c * ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_smul, lintegral_smul_measure]
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} {ι} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
simp only [lintegral, iSup_subtype', SimpleFunc.lintegral_sum, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [iSup_comm]
congr; funext s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s hi hs
· simp
simp only [Finset.sum_insert hi, ← hs]
refine (ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup ?_).symm
intro φ ψ
exact
⟨⟨φ ⊔ ψ, fun x => sup_le (φ.2 x) (ψ.2 x)⟩,
add_le_add (SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_left le_rfl)
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => SimpleFunc.lintegral_mono le_sup_right le_rfl)⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_sum_measure
theorem hasSum_lintegral_measure {ι} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
HasSum (fun i => ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i) (∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.sum μ) :=
(lintegral_sum_measure f μ).symm ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align measure_theory.has_sum_lintegral_measure MeasureTheory.hasSum_lintegral_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ ν : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(μ + ν) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a, f a ∂ν := by
simpa [tsum_fintype] using lintegral_sum_measure f fun b => cond b μ ν
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (s : Finset ι) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : ι → Measure α) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂(∑ i ∈ s, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ i := by
rw [← Measure.sum_coe_finset, lintegral_sum_measure, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
simp only [Finset.coe_sort_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [lintegral]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_of_isEmpty {α} [MeasurableSpace α] [IsEmpty α] (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
have : Subsingleton (Measure α) := inferInstance
convert lintegral_zero_measure f
theorem set_lintegral_empty (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in ∅, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [Measure.restrict_empty, lintegral_zero_measure]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_empty MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_empty
theorem set_lintegral_univ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ x in univ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_univ MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_univ
theorem set_lintegral_measure_zero (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hs' : μ s = 0) :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = 0 := by
convert lintegral_zero_measure _
exact Measure.restrict_eq_zero.2 hs'
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_measure_zero MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_measure_zero
theorem lintegral_finset_sum' (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f b) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with a s has ih
· simp
· simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at hf
rw [lintegral_add_left' hf.1, ih hf.2]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum'
theorem lintegral_finset_sum (s : Finset β) {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b ∈ s, Measurable (f b)) :
∫⁻ a, ∑ b ∈ s, f b a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ :=
lintegral_finset_sum' s fun b hb => (hf b hb).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.lintegral_finset_sum
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const_mul (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, (const α r * eapprox f n) a ∂μ := by
congr
funext a
rw [← iSup_eapprox_apply f hf, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
simp
_ = ⨆ n, r * (eapprox f n).lintegral μ := by
rw [lintegral_iSup]
· congr
funext n
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral]
· intro n
exact SimpleFunc.measurable _
· intro i j h a
exact mul_le_mul_left' (monotone_eapprox _ h _) _
_ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by rw [← ENNReal.mul_iSup, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul
theorem lintegral_const_mul'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
have B : ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, r * hf.mk f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.ae_eq_mk _)
rw [A, B, lintegral_const_mul _ hf.measurable_mk]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul''
theorem lintegral_const_mul_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral, ENNReal.mul_iSup]
refine iSup_le fun s => ?_
rw [ENNReal.mul_iSup, iSup_le_iff]
intro hs
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_mul_lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_iSup_of_le (const α r * s) (le_iSup_of_le (fun x => ?_) le_rfl)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (hs x) _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul_le
theorem lintegral_const_mul' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h]
apply le_antisymm _ (lintegral_const_mul_le r f)
have rinv : r * r⁻¹ = 1 := ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel h hr
have rinv' : r⁻¹ * r = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact rinv
have := lintegral_const_mul_le (μ := μ) r⁻¹ fun x => r * f x
simp? [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv'] at this says
simp only [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv', one_mul] at this
simpa [(mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, rinv] using mul_le_mul_left' this r
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_mul' MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_mul'
theorem lintegral_mul_const (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const
theorem lintegral_mul_const'' (r : ℝ≥0∞) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul'' r hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const'' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const''
theorem lintegral_mul_const_le (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ := by
simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul_le r f]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const_le
theorem lintegral_mul_const' (r : ℝ≥0∞) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by simp_rw [mul_comm, lintegral_const_mul' r f hr]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mul_const' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mul_const'
/- A double integral of a product where each factor contains only one variable
is a product of integrals -/
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul {β} [MeasurableSpace β] {ν : Measure β} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
{g : β → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g ν) :
∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x * g y ∂ν ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) * ∫⁻ y, g y ∂ν := by
simp [lintegral_const_mul'' _ hg, lintegral_mul_const'' _ hf]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₁ {f f' : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h.mono fun a h => by dsimp only; rw [h]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₁ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₁
-- TODO: Need a better way of rewriting inside of an integral
theorem lintegral_rw₂ {f₁ f₁' : α → β} {f₂ f₂' : α → γ} (h₁ : f₁ =ᵐ[μ] f₁') (h₂ : f₂ =ᵐ[μ] f₂')
(g : β → γ → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, g (f₁ a) (f₂ a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g (f₁' a) (f₂' a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h₁.mp <| h₂.mono fun _ h₂ h₁ => by dsimp only; rw [h₁, h₂]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rw₂ MeasureTheory.lintegral_rw₂
theorem lintegral_indicator_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral]
apply iSup_le (fun g ↦ (iSup_le (fun hg ↦ ?_)))
have : g ≤ f := hg.trans (indicator_le_self s f)
refine le_iSup_of_le g (le_iSup_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_))
rw [lintegral_restrict, SimpleFunc.lintegral]
congr with t
by_cases H : t = 0
· simp [H]
congr with x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
rintro rfl
contrapose! H
simpa [H] using hg x
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm (lintegral_indicator_le f s)
simp only [lintegral, ← restrict_lintegral_eq_lintegral_restrict _ hs, iSup_subtype']
refine iSup_mono' (Subtype.forall.2 fun φ hφ => ?_)
refine ⟨⟨φ.restrict s, fun x => ?_⟩, le_rfl⟩
simp [hφ x, hs, indicator_le_indicator]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator
theorem lintegral_indicator₀ (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_congr_ae (indicator_ae_eq_of_ae_eq_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq),
lintegral_indicator _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
Measure.restrict_congr_set hs.toMeasurable_ae_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator₀
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ ≤ c * μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_le _ _).trans (set_lintegral_const s c).le
theorem lintegral_indicator_const₀ {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_indicator₀ _ hs, set_lintegral_const]
theorem lintegral_indicator_const {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) a ∂μ = c * μ s :=
lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet c
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const
theorem set_lintegral_eq_const {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ x in { x | f x = r }, f x ∂μ = r * μ { x | f x = r } := by
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ { x | f x = r } → f x = r := ae_of_all μ fun _ hx => hx
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun _ this]
· rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter]
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton r)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_eq_const
theorem lintegral_indicator_one_le (s : Set α) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ ≤ μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const_le _ _).trans <| (one_mul _).le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one₀ (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs _).trans <| one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_indicator_one (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ∫⁻ a, s.indicator 1 a ∂μ = μ s :=
(lintegral_indicator_const hs _).trans <| one_mul _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_one
/-- A version of **Markov's inequality** for two functions. It doesn't follow from the standard
Markov's inequality because we only assume measurability of `g`, not `f`. -/
theorem lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hle : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq μ f with ⟨φ, hφm, hφ_le, hφ_eq⟩
calc
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } = ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | f x + ε ≤ g x } := by
rw [hφ_eq]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, φ x ∂μ + ε * μ { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } := by
gcongr
exact fun x => (add_le_add_right (hφ_le _) _).trans
_ = ∫⁻ x, φ x + indicator { x | φ x + ε ≤ g x } (fun _ => ε) x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_add_left hφm, lintegral_indicator₀, set_lintegral_const]
exact measurableSet_le (hφm.nullMeasurable.measurable'.add_const _) hg.nullMeasurable
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := lintegral_mono_ae (hle.mono fun x hx₁ => ?_)
simp only [indicator_apply]; split_ifs with hx₂
exacts [hx₂, (add_zero _).trans_le <| (hφ_le x).trans hx₁]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. -/
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
simpa only [lintegral_zero, zero_add] using
lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral (ae_of_all _ fun x => zero_le (f x)) hf ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. For a version assuming
`AEMeasurable`, see `mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀`. -/
theorem mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (ε : ℝ≥0∞) :
ε * μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ :=
mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf.aemeasurable ε
#align measure_theory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral MeasureTheory.mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral
lemma meas_le_lintegral₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : ∀ x ∈ s, 1 ≤ f x) : μ s ≤ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_trans _ (mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf 1)
rw [one_mul]
exact measure_mono hs
lemma lintegral_le_meas {s : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≤ 1) (h'f : ∀ a ∈ sᶜ, f a = 0) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ μ s := by
apply (lintegral_mono (fun x ↦ ?_)).trans (lintegral_indicator_one_le s)
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [hx] using hf x
· simpa [hx] using h'f x hx
theorem lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hμf : μ {x | f x = ∞} ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <|
calc
∞ = ∞ * μ { x | ∞ ≤ f x } := by simp [mul_eq_top, hμf]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ∞
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) ≠ 0) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∞ :=
lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf <|
mt (eq_bot_mono <| by rw [← setOf_inter_eq_sep]; exact Measure.le_restrict_apply _ _) hμf
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero MeasureTheory.setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero
theorem measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hμf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
μ {x | f x = ∞} = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| lintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s))
(hμf : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : μ ({x ∈ s | f x = ∞}) = 0 :=
of_not_not fun h => hμf <| setLintegral_eq_top_of_measure_eq_top_ne_zero hf h
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_top_of_set_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.measure_eq_top_of_setLintegral_ne_top
/-- **Markov's inequality** also known as **Chebyshev's first inequality**. -/
theorem meas_ge_le_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0)
(hε' : ε ≠ ∞) : μ { x | ε ≤ f x } ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) / ε :=
(ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl hε) (Or.inl hε')).2 <| by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_meas_ge_le_lintegral₀ hf ε
#align measure_theory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div MeasureTheory.meas_ge_le_lintegral_div
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hgf : ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
have : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g x < f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
intro n
simp only [ae_iff, not_lt]
have : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ + (↑n)⁻¹ * μ { x : α | f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ≤ g x } ≤ ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_mul_meas_add_le_le_lintegral hfg hg n⁻¹).trans hgf
rw [(ENNReal.cancel_of_ne hf).add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at this
exact this.resolve_left (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 (ENNReal.natCast_ne_top _))
refine hfg.mp ((ae_all_iff.2 this).mono fun x hlt hle => hle.antisymm ?_)
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f x + (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) from
ge_of_tendsto' this fun i => (hlt i).le
simpa only [inv_top, add_zero] using
tendsto_const_nhds.add (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top)
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
have : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ ≠ ∞ := by simp [lintegral_zero, zero_ne_top]
⟨fun h =>
(ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le (ae_of_all _ <| zero_le f) this hf
(h.trans lintegral_zero.symm).le).symm,
fun h => (lintegral_congr_ae h).trans lintegral_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff' MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_eq_zero_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
lintegral_eq_zero_iff' hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.lintegral_eq_zero_iff
theorem lintegral_pos_iff_support {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) :
(0 < ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, hf, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Function.support]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_pos_iff_support MeasureTheory.lintegral_pos_iff_support
theorem setLintegral_pos_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set α} :
0 < ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f ∩ s) := by
rw [lintegral_pos_iff_support hf, Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_support hf)]
/-- Weaker version of the monotone convergence theorem-/
theorem lintegral_iSup_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f n.succ a) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null (ae_iff.1 (ae_all_iff.2 h_mono))
let g n a := if a ∈ s then 0 else f n a
have g_eq_f : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, g n a = f n a :=
(measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 hs.2.2).mono fun a ha n => if_neg ha
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, g n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| g_eq_f.mono fun a ha => by simp only [ha]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, g n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => measurable_const.piecewise hs.2.1 (hf n))
(monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n a => ?_))
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by simp only [lintegral_congr_ae (g_eq_f.mono fun _a ha => ha _)]
simp only [g]
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· have := Set.not_mem_subset hs.1 h
simp only [not_forall, not_le, mem_setOf_eq, not_exists, not_lt] at this
exact this n
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_ae
theorem lintegral_sub' {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq hg_fin ?_
rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hg]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (h_le.mono fun x hx => tsub_add_cancel_of_le hx)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub'
theorem lintegral_sub {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : Measurable g) (hg_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_le : g ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : ∫⁻ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub' hg.aemeasurable hg_fin h_le
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub
theorem lintegral_sub_le' (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_right]
by_cases hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∞
· rw [hfi, add_top]
exact le_top
· rw [← lintegral_add_right' _ hf]
gcongr
exact le_tsub_add
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le'
theorem lintegral_sub_le (f g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x, g x - f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_sub_le' f g hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_sub_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_sub_le
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h : ∃ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ≠ g x) :
∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
contrapose! h
simp only [not_frequently, Ne, Classical.not_not]
exact ae_eq_of_ae_le_of_lintegral_le h_le hfi hg h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt
theorem lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_le : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) {s : Set α} (hμs : μ s ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_frequently_ae_lt hg hfi h_le <|
((frequently_ae_mem_iff.2 hμs).and_eventually h).mono fun _x hx => (hx.2 hx.1).ne
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on
theorem lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hfi : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
rw [Ne, ← Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
refine lintegral_strict_mono_of_ae_le_of_ae_lt_on hg hfi (ae_le_of_ae_lt h) hμ ?_
simpa using h
#align measure_theory.lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_strict_mono
theorem set_lintegral_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α} (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(hs : μ s ≠ 0) (hg : Measurable g) (hfi : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x < g x) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∫⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ :=
lintegral_strict_mono (by simp [hs]) hg.aemeasurable hfi ((ae_restrict_iff' hsm).mpr h)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_strict_mono MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_strict_mono
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for nonincreasing sequences of functions -/
theorem lintegral_iInf_ae {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_mono : ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ ≤ᵐ[μ] f n) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
have fn_le_f0 : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
have fn_le_f0' : ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ := iInf_le_of_le 0 le_rfl
(ENNReal.sub_right_inj h_fin fn_le_f0 fn_le_f0').1 <|
show ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ from
calc
∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_sub (measurable_iInf h_meas)
(ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono fun a => iInf_le _ _)
(ae_of_all _ fun a => iInf_le _ _)).symm
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ := congr rfl (funext fun a => ENNReal.sub_iInf)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a - f n a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup_ae (fun n => (h_meas 0).sub (h_meas n)) fun n =>
(h_mono n).mono fun a ha => tsub_le_tsub le_rfl ha)
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
(have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n : ℕ, f n.succ a ≤ f n a := ae_all_iff.2 h_mono
have h_mono : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, f n a ≤ f 0 a := fun n =>
h_mono.mono fun a h => by
induction' n with n ih
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_trans (h n) ih
congr_arg iSup <|
funext fun n =>
lintegral_sub (h_meas _) (ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin <| lintegral_mono_ae <| h_mono n)
(h_mono n))
_ = ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ - ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := ENNReal.sub_iInf.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi_ae MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_ae
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for nonincreasing sequences of functions -/
theorem lintegral_iInf {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) (h_anti : Antitone f)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iInf_ae h_meas (fun n => ae_of_all _ <| h_anti n.le_succ) h_fin
#align measure_theory.lintegral_infi MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf
theorem lintegral_iInf' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ)
(h_anti : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a)) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, f n a ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iInf_apply]
let p : α → (ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) → Prop := fun _ f' => Antitone f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := h_anti
have h_ae_seq_mono : Antitone (aeSeq h_meas p) := by
intro n m hnm x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet h_meas p
· exact aeSeq.prop_of_mem_aeSeqSet h_meas hx hnm
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iInf h_meas hp).symm]
simp_rw [iInf_apply]
rw [lintegral_iInf (aeSeq.measurable h_meas p) h_ae_seq_mono]
· congr
exact funext fun n ↦ lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp n)
· rwa [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae h_meas hp 0)]
/-- Monotone convergence for an infimum over a directed family and indexed by a countable type -/
theorem lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [Countable β]
{f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} {μ : Measure α} (hμ : μ ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b))
(hf_int : ∀ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_directed : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp only [iInf_of_empty, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.top_mul (Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero.mpr hμ)]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨅ b, f b a = ⨅ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
refine fun a =>
le_antisymm (le_iInf fun n => iInf_le _ _)
(le_iInf fun b => iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) ?_)
exact h_directed.sequence_le b a
-- Porting note: used `∘` below to deal with its reduced reducibility
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨅ b, f b a ∂μ
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by simp only [this, Function.comp_apply]
_ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ a, (f ∘ h_directed.sequence f) n a ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_iInf ?_ h_directed.sequence_anti]
· exact hf_int _
· exact fun n => hf _
_ = ⨅ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun b => ?_) (le_iInf fun n => ?_)
· exact iInf_le_of_le (Encodable.encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.sequence_le b)
· exact iInf_le (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
#align lintegral_infi_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iInf_directed_of_measurable
/-- Known as Fatou's lemma, version with `AEMeasurable` functions -/
theorem lintegral_liminf_le' {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
calc
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat]
_ = ⨆ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨅ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup' (fun n => aemeasurable_biInf _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ h_meas i))
(ae_of_all μ fun a n m hnm => iInf_le_iInf_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi))
_ ≤ ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := iSup_mono fun n => le_iInf₂_lintegral _
_ = atTop.liminf fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ := Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat.symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le' MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le'
/-- Known as Fatou's lemma -/
theorem lintegral_liminf_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} (h_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n)) :
∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop :=
lintegral_liminf_le' fun n => (h_meas n).aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_liminf_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_liminf_le
theorem limsup_lintegral_le {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (f n))
(h_bound : ∀ n, f n ≤ᵐ[μ] g) (h_fin : ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ ≠ ∞) :
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ :=
calc
limsup (fun n => ∫⁻ a, f n a ∂μ) atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
_ ≤ ⨅ n : ℕ, ∫⁻ a, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := iInf_mono fun n => iSup₂_lintegral_le _
_ = ∫⁻ a, ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, f i a ∂μ := by
refine (lintegral_iInf ?_ ?_ ?_).symm
· intro n
exact measurable_biSup _ (to_countable _) (fun i _ ↦ hf_meas i)
· intro n m hnm a
exact iSup_le_iSup_of_subset fun i hi => le_trans hnm hi
· refine ne_top_of_le_ne_top h_fin (lintegral_mono_ae ?_)
refine (ae_all_iff.2 h_bound).mono fun n hn => ?_
exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => hn i
_ = ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => f n a) atTop ∂μ := by simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat]
#align measure_theory.limsup_lintegral_le MeasureTheory.limsup_lintegral_le
/-- Dominated convergence theorem for nonnegative functions -/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) :=
tendsto_of_le_liminf_of_limsup_le
(calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, liminf (fun n : ℕ => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.liminf_eq.symm
_ ≤ liminf (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop := lintegral_liminf_le hF_meas
)
(calc
limsup (fun n : ℕ => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop ≤ ∫⁻ a, limsup (fun n => F n a) atTop ∂μ :=
limsup_lintegral_le hF_meas h_bound h_fin
_ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| h_lim.mono fun a h => h.limsup_eq
)
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence
/-- Dominated convergence theorem for nonnegative functions which are just almost everywhere
measurable. -/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' {F : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(bound : α → ℝ≥0∞) (hF_meas : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (F n) μ) (h_bound : ∀ n, F n ≤ᵐ[μ] bound)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ)) := by
have : ∀ n, ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a ∂μ := fun n =>
lintegral_congr_ae (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk
simp_rw [this]
apply
tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence bound (fun n => (hF_meas n).measurable_mk) _ h_fin
· have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := fun n => (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk.symm
have : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ n, (hF_meas n).mk (F n) a = F n a := ae_all_iff.mpr this
filter_upwards [this, h_lim] with a H H'
simp_rw [H]
exact H'
· intro n
filter_upwards [h_bound n, (hF_meas n).ae_eq_mk] with a H H'
rwa [H'] at H
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence'
/-- Dominated convergence theorem for filters with a countable basis -/
theorem tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence {ι} {l : Filter ι}
[l.IsCountablyGenerated] {F : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (bound : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ n in l, Measurable (F n)) (h_bound : ∀ᶠ n in l, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, F n a ≤ bound a)
(h_fin : ∫⁻ a, bound a ∂μ ≠ ∞) (h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) l (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, F n a ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro x xl
have hxl := by
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at xl
exact xl
have h := inter_mem hF_meas h_bound
replace h := hxl _ h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [← tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat k]
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact bound
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).1
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· intro
refine (h _ ?_).2
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
· assumption
· refine h_lim.mono fun a h_lim => ?_
apply @Tendsto.comp _ _ _ (fun n => x (n + k)) fun n => F n a
· assumption
rw [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat]
assumption
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_filter_of_dominated_convergence
theorem lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {f : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞} {F : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ n, AEMeasurable (f n) μ) (h_anti : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h0 : ∫⁻ a, f 0 a ∂μ ≠ ∞)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
have : Antitone fun n ↦ ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ := fun i j hij ↦
lintegral_mono_ae (h_anti.mono fun x hx ↦ hx hij)
suffices key : ∫⁻ x, F x ∂μ = ⨅ n, ∫⁻ x, f n x ∂μ by
rw [key]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf this
rw [← lintegral_iInf' hf h_anti h0]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [h_anti, h_tendsto] with _ hx_anti hx_tendsto
using tendsto_nhds_unique hx_tendsto (tendsto_atTop_iInf hx_anti)
section
open Encodable
/-- Monotone convergence for a supremum over a directed family and indexed by a countable type -/
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ b, Measurable (f b)) (h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) :
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· simp [iSup_of_empty]
inhabit β
have : ∀ a, ⨆ b, f b a = ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a := by
intro a
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun b => ?_) (iSup_le fun n => le_iSup (fun n => f n a) _)
exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (h_directed.le_sequence b a)
calc
∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ⨆ n, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ := by simp only [this]
_ = ⨆ n, ∫⁻ a, f (h_directed.sequence f n) a ∂μ :=
(lintegral_iSup (fun n => hf _) h_directed.sequence_mono)
_ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
refine le_antisymm (iSup_le fun n => ?_) (iSup_le fun b => ?_)
· exact le_iSup (fun b => ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ) _
· exact le_iSup_of_le (encode b + 1) (lintegral_mono <| h_directed.le_sequence b)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed_of_measurable MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable
/-- Monotone convergence for a supremum over a directed family and indexed by a countable type. -/
theorem lintegral_iSup_directed [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ b, AEMeasurable (f b) μ)
(h_directed : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) : ∫⁻ a, ⨆ b, f b a ∂μ = ⨆ b, ∫⁻ a, f b a ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
let p : α → (β → ENNReal) → Prop := fun x f' => Directed LE.le f'
have hp : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x fun i => f i x := by
filter_upwards [] with x i j
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed i j
exact ⟨z, hz₁ x, hz₂ x⟩
have h_ae_seq_directed : Directed LE.le (aeSeq hf p) := by
intro b₁ b₂
obtain ⟨z, hz₁, hz₂⟩ := h_directed b₁ b₂
refine ⟨z, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ aeSeqSet hf p
· repeat rw [aeSeq.aeSeq_eq_fun_of_mem_aeSeqSet hf hx]
apply_rules [hz₁, hz₂]
· simp only [aeSeq, hx, if_false]
exact le_rfl
convert lintegral_iSup_directed_of_measurable (aeSeq.measurable hf p) h_ae_seq_directed using 1
· simp_rw [← iSup_apply]
rw [lintegral_congr_ae (aeSeq.iSup hf hp).symm]
· congr 1
ext1 b
rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
apply EventuallyEq.symm
exact aeSeq.aeSeq_n_eq_fun_n_ae hf hp _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_supr_directed MeasureTheory.lintegral_iSup_directed
end
theorem lintegral_tsum [Countable β] {f : β → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) :
∫⁻ a, ∑' i, f i a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ := by
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
rw [lintegral_iSup_directed]
· simp [lintegral_finset_sum' _ fun i _ => hf i]
· intro b
exact Finset.aemeasurable_sum _ fun i _ => hf i
· intro s t
use s ∪ t
constructor
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_left
· exact fun a => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset Finset.subset_union_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_tsum MeasureTheory.lintegral_tsum
open Measure
theorem lintegral_iUnion₀ [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(hd : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [Measure.restrict_iUnion_ae hd hm, lintegral_sum_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion₀
theorem lintegral_iUnion [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_iUnion₀ (fun i => (hm i).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion₀ {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : t.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, lintegral_iUnion₀ (SetCoe.forall'.1 hm) (hd.subtype _ _)]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion {t : Set β} {s : β → Set α} (ht : t.Countable)
(hm : ∀ i ∈ t, MeasurableSet (s i)) (hd : t.PairwiseDisjoint s) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i ∈ t, s i, f a ∂μ = ∑' i : t, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion₀ ht (fun i hi => (hm i hi).nullMeasurableSet) hd.aedisjoint f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on t)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t b) μ)
(f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [← Finset.mem_coe, lintegral_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hm hd, ← Finset.tsum_subtype']
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset₀
theorem lintegral_biUnion_finset {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} (hd : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t b)) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ b ∈ s, t b, f a ∂μ = ∑ b ∈ s, ∫⁻ a in t b, f a ∂μ :=
lintegral_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint (fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet) f
#align measure_theory.lintegral_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.lintegral_biUnion_finset
theorem lintegral_iUnion_le [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a in ⋃ i, s i, f a ∂μ ≤ ∑' i, ∫⁻ a in s i, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_sum_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' restrict_iUnion_le le_rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_Union_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_iUnion_le
theorem lintegral_union {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {A B : Set α} (hB : MeasurableSet B) (hAB : Disjoint A B) :
∫⁻ a in A ∪ B, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a in A, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in B, f a ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union hAB hB, lintegral_add_measure]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_union MeasureTheory.lintegral_union
theorem lintegral_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∫⁻ a in s ∪ t, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ + ∫⁻ a in t, f a ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure]
exact lintegral_mono' (restrict_union_le _ _) le_rfl
theorem lintegral_inter_add_diff {B : Set α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (A : Set α) (hB : MeasurableSet B) :
∫⁻ x in A ∩ B, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in A \ B, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, restrict_inter_add_diff _ hB]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.lintegral_inter_add_diff
theorem lintegral_add_compl (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {A : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
∫⁻ x in A, f x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in Aᶜ, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_measure, Measure.restrict_add_restrict_compl hA]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_add_compl MeasureTheory.lintegral_add_compl
theorem lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ x, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
have hm : MeasurableSet { x | f x ≤ g x } := measurableSet_le hf hg
rw [← lintegral_add_compl (fun x => max (f x) (g x)) hm]
simp only [← compl_setOf, ← not_le]
refine congr_arg₂ (· + ·) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm ?_) (set_lintegral_congr_fun hm.compl ?_)
exacts [ae_of_all _ fun x => max_eq_right (a := f x) (b := g x),
ae_of_all _ fun x (hx : ¬ f x ≤ g x) => max_eq_left (not_le.1 hx).le]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_max MeasureTheory.lintegral_max
theorem set_lintegral_max {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (s : Set α) :
∫⁻ x in s, max (f x) (g x) ∂μ =
∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x }, g x ∂μ + ∫⁻ x in s ∩ { x | g x < f x }, f x ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_max hf hg, restrict_restrict, restrict_restrict, inter_comm s, inter_comm s]
exacts [measurableSet_lt hg hf, measurableSet_le hf hg]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_max MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_max
theorem lintegral_map {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
erw [lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral hf, lintegral_eq_iSup_eapprox_lintegral (hf.comp hg)]
congr with n : 1
convert SimpleFunc.lintegral_map _ hg
ext1 x; simp only [eapprox_comp hf hg, coe_comp]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map MeasureTheory.lintegral_map
theorem lintegral_map' {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f (Measure.map g μ)) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ :=
calc
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂Measure.map g μ :=
lintegral_congr_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f a ∂Measure.map (hg.mk g) μ := by
congr 1
exact Measure.map_congr hg.ae_eq_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f (hg.mk g a) ∂μ := lintegral_map hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk
_ = ∫⁻ a, hf.mk f (g a) ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae <| hg.ae_eq_mk.symm.fun_comp _
_ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := lintegral_congr_ae (ae_eq_comp hg hf.ae_eq_mk.symm)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map' MeasureTheory.lintegral_map'
theorem lintegral_map_le {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) {g : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂Measure.map g μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by
rw [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral, ← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup_le fun h'i => ?_
refine le_iSup₂_of_le (i ∘ g) (hi.comp hg) ?_
exact le_iSup_of_le (fun x => h'i (g x)) (le_of_eq (lintegral_map hi hg))
#align measure_theory.lintegral_map_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_map_le
theorem lintegral_comp [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : lintegral μ (f ∘ g) = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ :=
(lintegral_map hf hg).symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_comp MeasureTheory.lintegral_comp
theorem set_lintegral_map [MeasurableSpace β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
∫⁻ y in s, f y ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ x in g ⁻¹' s, f (g x) ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_map hg hs, lintegral_map hf hg]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_map MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_map
theorem lintegral_indicator_const_comp {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : Measurable f) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
∫⁻ a, s.indicator (fun _ => c) (f a) ∂μ = c * μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
erw [lintegral_comp (measurable_const.indicator hs) hf, lintegral_indicator_const hs,
Measure.map_apply hf hs]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_indicator_const_comp MeasureTheory.lintegral_indicator_const_comp
/-- If `g : α → β` is a measurable embedding and `f : β → ℝ≥0∞` is any function (not necessarily
measurable), then `∫⁻ a, f a ∂(map g μ) = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ`. Compare with `lintegral_map` which
applies to any measurable `g : α → β` but requires that `f` is measurable as well. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 1,437 | 1,447 | theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.lintegral_map [MeasurableSpace β] {g : α → β}
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂map g μ = ∫⁻ a, f (g a) ∂μ := by |
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
refine le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun f₀ hf₀ => ?_) (iSup₂_le fun f₀ hf₀ => ?_)
· rw [SimpleFunc.lintegral_map _ hg.measurable]
have : (f₀.comp g hg.measurable : α → ℝ≥0∞) ≤ f ∘ g := fun x => hf₀ (g x)
exact le_iSup_of_le (comp f₀ g hg.measurable) (by exact le_iSup (α := ℝ≥0∞) _ this)
· rw [← f₀.extend_comp_eq hg (const _ 0), ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_map, ←
SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, ← lintegral]
refine lintegral_mono_ae (hg.ae_map_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
exact (extend_apply _ _ _ _).trans_le (hf₀ _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.NAry
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
#align_import order.bounds.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1abe23ae96fef89ad30d9f4362c307f72a55010"
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we define:
* `upperBounds`, `lowerBounds` : the set of upper bounds (resp., lower bounds) of a set;
* `BddAbove s`, `BddBelow s` : the set `s` is bounded above (resp., below), i.e., the set of upper
(resp., lower) bounds of `s` is nonempty;
* `IsLeast s a`, `IsGreatest s a` : `a` is a least (resp., greatest) element of `s`;
for a partial order, it is unique if exists;
* `IsLUB s a`, `IsGLB s a` : `a` is a least upper bound (resp., a greatest lower bound)
of `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists.
We also prove various lemmas about monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`, and provide
formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open Function Set
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
section
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
/-!
### Definitions
-/
/-- The set of upper bounds of a set. -/
def upperBounds (s : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x | ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ≤ x }
#align upper_bounds upperBounds
/-- The set of lower bounds of a set. -/
def lowerBounds (s : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x | ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → x ≤ a }
#align lower_bounds lowerBounds
/-- A set is bounded above if there exists an upper bound. -/
def BddAbove (s : Set α) :=
(upperBounds s).Nonempty
#align bdd_above BddAbove
/-- A set is bounded below if there exists a lower bound. -/
def BddBelow (s : Set α) :=
(lowerBounds s).Nonempty
#align bdd_below BddBelow
/-- `a` is a least element of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def IsLeast (s : Set α) (a : α) : Prop :=
a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds s
#align is_least IsLeast
/-- `a` is a greatest element of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def IsGreatest (s : Set α) (a : α) : Prop :=
a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ upperBounds s
#align is_greatest IsGreatest
/-- `a` is a least upper bound of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def IsLUB (s : Set α) : α → Prop :=
IsLeast (upperBounds s)
#align is_lub IsLUB
/-- `a` is a greatest lower bound of a set `s`; for a partial order, it is unique if exists. -/
def IsGLB (s : Set α) : α → Prop :=
IsGreatest (lowerBounds s)
#align is_glb IsGLB
theorem mem_upperBounds : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_bounds mem_upperBounds
theorem mem_lowerBounds : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_lower_bounds mem_lowerBounds
lemma mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Iic a := Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_bounds_iff_subset_Iic mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic
lemma mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Ici a := Iff.rfl
#align mem_lower_bounds_iff_subset_Ici mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici
theorem bddAbove_def : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
#align bdd_above_def bddAbove_def
theorem bddBelow_def : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align bdd_below_def bddBelow_def
theorem bot_mem_lowerBounds [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : ⊥ ∈ lowerBounds s := fun _ _ => bot_le
#align bot_mem_lower_bounds bot_mem_lowerBounds
theorem top_mem_upperBounds [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : ⊤ ∈ upperBounds s := fun _ _ => le_top
#align top_mem_upper_bounds top_mem_upperBounds
@[simp]
theorem isLeast_bot_iff [OrderBot α] : IsLeast s ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| bot_mem_lowerBounds _
#align is_least_bot_iff isLeast_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem isGreatest_top_iff [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest s ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| top_mem_upperBounds _
#align is_greatest_top_iff isGreatest_top_iff
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddAbove_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff' : ¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬y ≤ x := by
simp [BddAbove, upperBounds, Set.Nonempty]
#align not_bdd_above_iff' not_bddAbove_iff'
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddBelow_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff' : ¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬x ≤ y :=
@not_bddAbove_iff' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align not_bdd_below_iff' not_bddBelow_iff'
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddAbove_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y := by
simp only [not_bddAbove_iff', not_le]
#align not_bdd_above_iff not_bddAbove_iff
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddBelow_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bddAbove_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
#align not_bdd_below_iff not_bddBelow_iff
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddBelow (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddAbove (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
theorem BddAbove.dual (h : BddAbove s) : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
#align bdd_above.dual BddAbove.dual
theorem BddBelow.dual (h : BddBelow s) : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
#align bdd_below.dual BddBelow.dual
theorem IsLeast.dual (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGreatest (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
#align is_least.dual IsLeast.dual
theorem IsGreatest.dual (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLeast (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
#align is_greatest.dual IsGreatest.dual
theorem IsLUB.dual (h : IsLUB s a) : IsGLB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
#align is_lub.dual IsLUB.dual
theorem IsGLB.dual (h : IsGLB s a) : IsLUB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
#align is_glb.dual IsGLB.dual
/-- If `a` is the least element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with bottom element. -/
abbrev IsLeast.orderBot (h : IsLeast s a) :
OrderBot s where
bot := ⟨a, h.1⟩
bot_le := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
#align is_least.order_bot IsLeast.orderBot
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with top element. -/
abbrev IsGreatest.orderTop (h : IsGreatest s a) :
OrderTop s where
top := ⟨a, h.1⟩
le_top := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
#align is_greatest.order_top IsGreatest.orderTop
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
theorem upperBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
#align upper_bounds_mono_set upperBounds_mono_set
theorem lowerBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
#align lower_bounds_mono_set lowerBounds_mono_set
theorem upperBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upperBounds s → b ∈ upperBounds s :=
fun ha _ h => le_trans (ha h) hab
#align upper_bounds_mono_mem upperBounds_mono_mem
theorem lowerBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lowerBounds s → a ∈ lowerBounds s :=
fun hb _ h => le_trans hab (hb h)
#align lower_bounds_mono_mem lowerBounds_mono_mem
theorem upperBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upperBounds t → b ∈ upperBounds s := fun ha =>
upperBounds_mono_set hst <| upperBounds_mono_mem hab ha
#align upper_bounds_mono upperBounds_mono
theorem lowerBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lowerBounds t → a ∈ lowerBounds s := fun hb =>
lowerBounds_mono_set hst <| lowerBounds_mono_mem hab hb
#align lower_bounds_mono lowerBounds_mono
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddAbove.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddAbove t → BddAbove s :=
Nonempty.mono <| upperBounds_mono_set h
#align bdd_above.mono BddAbove.mono
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddBelow.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddBelow t → BddBelow s :=
Nonempty.mono <| lowerBounds_mono_set h
#align bdd_below.mono BddBelow.mono
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hp : IsLUB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsLUB t a :=
⟨upperBounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lowerBounds_mono_set (upperBounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
#align is_lub.of_subset_of_superset IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsGLB s a) (hp : IsGLB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsGLB t a :=
hs.dual.of_subset_of_superset hp hst htp
#align is_glb.of_subset_of_superset IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset
theorem IsLeast.mono (ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsLeast t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
#align is_least.mono IsLeast.mono
theorem IsGreatest.mono (ha : IsGreatest s a) (hb : IsGreatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
#align is_greatest.mono IsGreatest.mono
theorem IsLUB.mono (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : IsLUB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
IsLeast.mono hb ha <| upperBounds_mono_set hst
#align is_lub.mono IsLUB.mono
theorem IsGLB.mono (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsGLB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
IsGreatest.mono hb ha <| lowerBounds_mono_set hst
#align is_glb.mono IsGLB.mono
theorem subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ lowerBounds (upperBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
#align subset_lower_bounds_upper_bounds subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds
theorem subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ upperBounds (lowerBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
#align subset_upper_bounds_lower_bounds subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddAbove (lowerBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s)
#align set.nonempty.bdd_above_lower_bounds Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddBelow (upperBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds s)
#align set.nonempty.bdd_below_upper_bounds Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds
/-!
### Conversions
-/
theorem IsLeast.isGLB (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGLB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
#align is_least.is_glb IsLeast.isGLB
theorem IsGreatest.isLUB (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLUB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
#align is_greatest.is_lub IsGreatest.isLUB
theorem IsLUB.upperBounds_eq (h : IsLUB s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun hb => h.2 hb, fun hb => upperBounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
#align is_lub.upper_bounds_eq IsLUB.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.dual.upperBounds_eq
#align is_glb.lower_bounds_eq IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsLeast s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.isGLB.lowerBounds_eq
#align is_least.lower_bounds_eq IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq (h : IsGreatest s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
h.isLUB.upperBounds_eq
#align is_greatest.upper_bounds_eq IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem IsGreatest.lt_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : a < b ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x < b :=
⟨fun hlt _x hx => (h.2 hx).trans_lt hlt, fun h' => h' _ h.1⟩
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem IsLeast.lt_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : b < a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, b < x :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem isLUB_le_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s := by
rw [h.upperBounds_eq]
rfl
#align is_lub_le_iff isLUB_le_iff
theorem le_isGLB_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s := by
rw [h.lowerBounds_eq]
rfl
#align le_is_glb_iff le_isGLB_iff
theorem isLUB_iff_le_iff : IsLUB s a ↔ ∀ b, a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s :=
⟨fun h _ => isLUB_le_iff h, fun H => ⟨(H _).1 le_rfl, fun b hb => (H b).2 hb⟩⟩
#align is_lub_iff_le_iff isLUB_iff_le_iff
theorem isGLB_iff_le_iff : IsGLB s a ↔ ∀ b, b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
@isLUB_iff_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align is_glb_iff_le_iff isGLB_iff_le_iff
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsLUB.bddAbove (h : IsLUB s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
#align is_lub.bdd_above IsLUB.bddAbove
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsGLB.bddBelow (h : IsGLB s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
#align is_glb.bdd_below IsGLB.bddBelow
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsGreatest.bddAbove (h : IsGreatest s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
#align is_greatest.bdd_above IsGreatest.bddAbove
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsLeast.bddBelow (h : IsLeast s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
#align is_least.bdd_below IsLeast.bddBelow
theorem IsLeast.nonempty (h : IsLeast s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
#align is_least.nonempty IsLeast.nonempty
theorem IsGreatest.nonempty (h : IsGreatest s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
#align is_greatest.nonempty IsGreatest.nonempty
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_union : upperBounds (s ∪ t) = upperBounds s ∩ upperBounds t :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hb => ⟨fun _ hx => hb (Or.inl hx), fun _ hx => hb (Or.inr hx)⟩)
fun _ hb _ hx => hx.elim (fun hs => hb.1 hs) fun ht => hb.2 ht
#align upper_bounds_union upperBounds_union
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_union : lowerBounds (s ∪ t) = lowerBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t :=
@upperBounds_union αᵒᵈ _ s t
#align lower_bounds_union lowerBounds_union
theorem union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter :
upperBounds s ∪ upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset (upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_left)
(upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_right)
#align union_upper_bounds_subset_upper_bounds_inter union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter
theorem union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter :
lowerBounds s ∪ lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter αᵒᵈ _ s t
#align union_lower_bounds_subset_lower_bounds_inter union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter
theorem isLeast_union_iff {a : α} {s t : Set α} :
IsLeast (s ∪ t) a ↔ IsLeast s a ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds t ∨ a ∈ lowerBounds s ∧ IsLeast t a := by
simp [IsLeast, lowerBounds_union, or_and_right, and_comm (a := a ∈ t), and_assoc]
#align is_least_union_iff isLeast_union_iff
theorem isGreatest_union_iff :
IsGreatest (s ∪ t) a ↔
IsGreatest s a ∧ a ∈ upperBounds t ∨ a ∈ upperBounds s ∧ IsGreatest t a :=
@isLeast_union_iff αᵒᵈ _ a s t
#align is_greatest_union_iff isGreatest_union_iff
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_left (h : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
#align bdd_above.inter_of_left BddAbove.inter_of_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_right (h : BddAbove t) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
#align bdd_above.inter_of_right BddAbove.inter_of_right
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_left (h : BddBelow s) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
#align bdd_below.inter_of_left BddBelow.inter_of_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_right (h : BddBelow t) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
#align bdd_below.inter_of_right BddBelow.inter_of_right
/-- In a directed order, the union of bounded above sets is bounded above. -/
theorem BddAbove.union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove s → BddAbove t → BddAbove (s ∪ t) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b
rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_union]
exact ⟨c, upperBounds_mono_mem hca ha, upperBounds_mono_mem hcb hb⟩
#align bdd_above.union BddAbove.union
/-- In a directed order, the union of two sets is bounded above if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddAbove_union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove (s ∪ t) ↔ BddAbove s ∧ BddAbove t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono subset_union_left, h.mono subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
#align bdd_above_union bddAbove_union
/-- In a codirected order, the union of bounded below sets is bounded below. -/
theorem BddBelow.union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → BddBelow (s ∪ t) :=
@BddAbove.union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align bdd_below.union BddBelow.union
/-- In a codirected order, the union of two sets is bounded below if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddBelow_union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow (s ∪ t) ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddBelow t :=
@bddAbove_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align bdd_below_union bddBelow_union
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLUB.union [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ht : IsLUB t b) :
IsLUB (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨fun _ h =>
h.casesOn (fun h => le_sup_of_le_left <| hs.left h) fun h => le_sup_of_le_right <| ht.left h,
fun _ hc =>
sup_le (hs.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inl hd) (ht.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inr hd)⟩
#align is_lub.union IsLUB.union
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGLB.union [SemilatticeInf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s a₁)
(ht : IsGLB t a₂) : IsGLB (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
hs.dual.union ht
#align is_glb.union IsGLB.union
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLeast.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsLeast s a)
(hb : IsLeast t b) : IsLeast (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isGLB.union hb.isGLB).1⟩
#align is_least.union IsLeast.union
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGreatest.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsGreatest s a)
(hb : IsGreatest t b) : IsGreatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isLUB.union hb.isLUB).1⟩
#align is_greatest.union IsGreatest.union
theorem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsLUB (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => ha.1 hx.1, fun c hc =>
have hbc : b ≤ c := hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩
ha.2 fun x hx => ((le_total x b).elim fun hxb => hxb.trans hbc) fun hbx => hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
#align is_lub.inter_Ici_of_mem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem
theorem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsGLB (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
ha.dual.inter_Ici_of_mem hb
#align is_glb.inter_Iic_of_mem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem
theorem bddAbove_iff_exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := by
rw [bddAbove_def, exists_ge_and_iff_exists]
exact Monotone.ball fun x _ => monotone_le
#align bdd_above_iff_exists_ge bddAbove_iff_exists_ge
theorem bddBelow_iff_exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
bddAbove_iff_exists_ge (toDual x₀)
#align bdd_below_iff_exists_le bddBelow_iff_exists_le
theorem BddAbove.exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddAbove s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
(bddAbove_iff_exists_ge x₀).mp hs
#align bdd_above.exists_ge BddAbove.exists_ge
theorem BddBelow.exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddBelow s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(bddBelow_iff_exists_le x₀).mp hs
#align bdd_below.exists_le BddBelow.exists_le
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
theorem isLeast_Ici : IsLeast (Ici a) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => id⟩
#align is_least_Ici isLeast_Ici
theorem isGreatest_Iic : IsGreatest (Iic a) a :=
⟨right_mem_Iic, fun _ => id⟩
#align is_greatest_Iic isGreatest_Iic
theorem isLUB_Iic : IsLUB (Iic a) a :=
isGreatest_Iic.isLUB
#align is_lub_Iic isLUB_Iic
theorem isGLB_Ici : IsGLB (Ici a) a :=
isLeast_Ici.isGLB
#align is_glb_Ici isGLB_Ici
theorem upperBounds_Iic : upperBounds (Iic a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iic.upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_Iic upperBounds_Iic
theorem lowerBounds_Ici : lowerBounds (Ici a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ici.lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bounds_Ici lowerBounds_Ici
theorem bddAbove_Iic : BddAbove (Iic a) :=
isLUB_Iic.bddAbove
#align bdd_above_Iic bddAbove_Iic
theorem bddBelow_Ici : BddBelow (Ici a) :=
isGLB_Ici.bddBelow
#align bdd_below_Ici bddBelow_Ici
theorem bddAbove_Iio : BddAbove (Iio a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
#align bdd_above_Iio bddAbove_Iio
theorem bddBelow_Ioi : BddBelow (Ioi a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
#align bdd_below_Ioi bddBelow_Ioi
theorem lub_Iio_le (a : α) (hb : IsLUB (Iio a) b) : b ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff hb).mpr fun _ hk => le_of_lt hk
#align lub_Iio_le lub_Iio_le
theorem le_glb_Ioi (a : α) (hb : IsGLB (Ioi a) b) : a ≤ b :=
@lub_Iio_le αᵒᵈ _ _ a hb
#align le_glb_Ioi le_glb_Ioi
theorem lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsLUB (Iio i) j) :
j = i ∨ Iio i = Iic j := by
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (lub_Iio_le i hj) with hj_eq_i hj_lt_i
· exact Or.inl hj_eq_i
· right
exact Set.ext fun k => ⟨fun hk_lt => hj.1 hk_lt, fun hk_le_j => lt_of_le_of_lt hk_le_j hj_lt_i⟩
#align lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic
theorem glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsGLB (Ioi i) j) :
j = i ∨ Ioi i = Ici j :=
@lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic γᵒᵈ _ j i hj
#align glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici
section
variable [LinearOrder γ]
theorem exists_lub_Iio (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsLUB (Iio i) j := by
by_cases h_exists_lt : ∃ j, j ∈ upperBounds (Iio i) ∧ j < i
· obtain ⟨j, hj_ub, hj_lt_i⟩ := h_exists_lt
exact ⟨j, hj_ub, fun k hk_ub => hk_ub hj_lt_i⟩
· refine ⟨i, fun j hj => le_of_lt hj, ?_⟩
rw [mem_lowerBounds]
by_contra h
refine h_exists_lt ?_
push_neg at h
exact h
#align exists_lub_Iio exists_lub_Iio
theorem exists_glb_Ioi (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsGLB (Ioi i) j :=
@exists_lub_Iio γᵒᵈ _ i
#align exists_glb_Ioi exists_glb_Ioi
variable [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Iio {a : γ} : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx, fun _ hy => le_of_forall_ge_of_dense hy⟩
#align is_lub_Iio isLUB_Iio
theorem isGLB_Ioi {a : γ} : IsGLB (Ioi a) a :=
@isLUB_Iio γᵒᵈ _ _ a
#align is_glb_Ioi isGLB_Ioi
theorem upperBounds_Iio {a : γ} : upperBounds (Iio a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iio.upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_Iio upperBounds_Iio
theorem lowerBounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lowerBounds (Ioi a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ioi.lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bounds_Ioi lowerBounds_Ioi
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
theorem isGreatest_singleton : IsGreatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, fun _ hx => le_of_eq <| eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
#align is_greatest_singleton isGreatest_singleton
theorem isLeast_singleton : IsLeast {a} a :=
@isGreatest_singleton αᵒᵈ _ a
#align is_least_singleton isLeast_singleton
theorem isLUB_singleton : IsLUB {a} a :=
isGreatest_singleton.isLUB
#align is_lub_singleton isLUB_singleton
theorem isGLB_singleton : IsGLB {a} a :=
isLeast_singleton.isGLB
#align is_glb_singleton isGLB_singleton
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_singleton : BddAbove ({a} : Set α) := isLUB_singleton.bddAbove
#align bdd_above_singleton bddAbove_singleton
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_singleton : BddBelow ({a} : Set α) := isGLB_singleton.bddBelow
#align bdd_below_singleton bddBelow_singleton
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_singleton : upperBounds {a} = Ici a :=
isLUB_singleton.upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_singleton upperBounds_singleton
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_singleton : lowerBounds {a} = Iic a :=
isGLB_singleton.lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bounds_singleton lowerBounds_singleton
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
theorem bddAbove_Icc : BddAbove (Icc a b) :=
⟨b, fun _ => And.right⟩
#align bdd_above_Icc bddAbove_Icc
theorem bddBelow_Icc : BddBelow (Icc a b) :=
⟨a, fun _ => And.left⟩
#align bdd_below_Icc bddBelow_Icc
theorem bddAbove_Ico : BddAbove (Ico a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align bdd_above_Ico bddAbove_Ico
theorem bddBelow_Ico : BddBelow (Ico a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
#align bdd_below_Ico bddBelow_Ico
theorem bddAbove_Ioc : BddAbove (Ioc a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align bdd_above_Ioc bddAbove_Ioc
theorem bddBelow_Ioc : BddBelow (Ioc a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align bdd_below_Ioc bddBelow_Ioc
theorem bddAbove_Ioo : BddAbove (Ioo a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
#align bdd_above_Ioo bddAbove_Ioo
theorem bddBelow_Ioo : BddBelow (Ioo a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
#align bdd_below_Ioo bddBelow_Ioo
theorem isGreatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGreatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
#align is_greatest_Icc isGreatest_Icc
theorem isLUB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLUB (Icc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Icc h).isLUB
#align is_lub_Icc isLUB_Icc
theorem upperBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upperBounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_Icc upperBounds_Icc
theorem isLeast_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLeast (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
#align is_least_Icc isLeast_Icc
theorem isGLB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGLB (Icc a b) a :=
(isLeast_Icc h).isGLB
#align is_glb_Icc isGLB_Icc
theorem lowerBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lowerBounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bounds_Icc lowerBounds_Icc
theorem isGreatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsGreatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
#align is_greatest_Ioc isGreatest_Ioc
theorem isLUB_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Ioc h).isLUB
#align is_lub_Ioc isLUB_Ioc
theorem upperBounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_Ioc upperBounds_Ioc
theorem isLeast_Ico (h : a < b) : IsLeast (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
#align is_least_Ico isLeast_Ico
theorem isGLB_Ico (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ico a b) a :=
(isLeast_Ico h).isGLB
#align is_glb_Ico isGLB_Ico
theorem lowerBounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bounds_Ico lowerBounds_Ico
section
variable [SemilatticeSup γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isGLB_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨fun x hx => hx.1.le, fun x hx => by
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ h₂
· exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le⟩
#align is_glb_Ioo isGLB_Ioo
theorem lowerBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bounds_Ioo lowerBounds_Ioo
theorem isGLB_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioc a b) a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (isGLB_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
#align is_glb_Ioc isGLB_Ioc
theorem lowerBounds_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioc hab).lowerBounds_eq
#align lower_bound_Ioc lowerBounds_Ioc
end
section
variable [SemilatticeInf γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioo a b) b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioo] using isGLB_Ioo hab.dual
#align is_lub_Ioo isLUB_Ioo
theorem upperBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioo hab).upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_Ioo upperBounds_Ioo
theorem isLUB_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ico a b) b := by
simpa only [dual_Ioc] using isGLB_Ioc hab.dual
#align is_lub_Ico isLUB_Ico
theorem upperBounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ico hab).upperBounds_eq
#align upper_bounds_Ico upperBounds_Ico
end
theorem bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a :=
Iff.rfl
#align bdd_below_iff_subset_Ici bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici
theorem bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a :=
Iff.rfl
#align bdd_above_iff_subset_Iic bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic
theorem bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc : BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b := by
simp [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici,
bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_left, exists_and_right]
#align bdd_below_bdd_above_iff_subset_Icc bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc
/-!
#### Univ
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_univ_iff : IsGreatest univ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds, IsTop]
#align is_greatest_univ_iff isGreatest_univ_iff
theorem isGreatest_univ [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ_iff.2 isTop_top
#align is_greatest_univ isGreatest_univ
@[simp]
theorem OrderTop.upperBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderTop γ] :
upperBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊤} := by rw [isGreatest_univ.upperBounds_eq, Ici_top]
#align order_top.upper_bounds_univ OrderTop.upperBounds_univ
theorem isLUB_univ [OrderTop α] : IsLUB (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ.isLUB
#align is_lub_univ isLUB_univ
@[simp]
theorem OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ] :
lowerBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊥} :=
@OrderTop.upperBounds_univ γᵒᵈ _ _
#align order_bot.lower_bounds_univ OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp] theorem isLeast_univ_iff : IsLeast univ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGreatest_univ_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
#align is_least_univ_iff isLeast_univ_iff
theorem isLeast_univ [OrderBot α] : IsLeast (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
@isGreatest_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
#align is_least_univ isLeast_univ
theorem isGLB_univ [OrderBot α] : IsGLB (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.isGLB
#align is_glb_univ isGLB_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ [NoMaxOrder α] : upperBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun b hb =>
let ⟨_, hx⟩ := exists_gt b
not_le_of_lt hx (hb trivial)
#align no_max_order.upper_bounds_univ NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ [NoMinOrder α] : lowerBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
@NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
#align no_min_order.lower_bounds_univ NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddAbove_univ [NoMaxOrder α] : ¬BddAbove (univ : Set α) := by simp [BddAbove]
#align not_bdd_above_univ not_bddAbove_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddBelow_univ [NoMinOrder α] : ¬BddBelow (univ : Set α) :=
@not_bddAbove_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
#align not_bdd_below_univ not_bddBelow_univ
/-!
#### Empty set
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_empty : upperBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ := by
simp only [upperBounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_empty, forall_true_iff]
#align upper_bounds_empty upperBounds_empty
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_empty : lowerBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ :=
@upperBounds_empty αᵒᵈ _
#align lower_bounds_empty lowerBounds_empty
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_empty [Nonempty α] : BddAbove (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddAbove, upperBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
#align bdd_above_empty bddAbove_empty
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_empty [Nonempty α] : BddBelow (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddBelow, lowerBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
#align bdd_below_empty bddBelow_empty
@[simp] theorem isGLB_empty_iff : IsGLB ∅ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGLB]
#align is_glb_empty_iff isGLB_empty_iff
@[simp] theorem isLUB_empty_iff : IsLUB ∅ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGLB_empty_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
#align is_lub_empty_iff isLUB_empty_iff
theorem isGLB_empty [OrderTop α] : IsGLB ∅ (⊤ : α) :=
isGLB_empty_iff.2 isTop_top
#align is_glb_empty isGLB_empty
theorem isLUB_empty [OrderBot α] : IsLUB ∅ (⊥ : α) :=
@isGLB_empty αᵒᵈ _ _
#align is_lub_empty isLUB_empty
theorem IsLUB.nonempty [NoMinOrder α] (hs : IsLUB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨a', ha'⟩ := exists_lt a
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h =>
not_le_of_lt ha' <| hs.right <| by rw [h, upperBounds_empty]; exact mem_univ _
#align is_lub.nonempty IsLUB.nonempty
theorem IsGLB.nonempty [NoMaxOrder α] (hs : IsGLB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.dual.nonempty
#align is_glb.nonempty IsGLB.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddAbove [ha : Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddAbove s) : s.Nonempty :=
(Nonempty.elim ha) fun x => (not_bddAbove_iff'.1 h x).imp fun _ ha => ha.1
#align nonempty_of_not_bdd_above nonempty_of_not_bddAbove
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddBelow [Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddBelow s) : s.Nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bddAbove αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
#align nonempty_of_not_bdd_below nonempty_of_not_bddBelow
/-!
#### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/Basic.lean | 935 | 937 | theorem bddAbove_insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddAbove (insert a s) ↔ BddAbove s := by |
simp only [insert_eq, bddAbove_union, bddAbove_singleton, true_and_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical symmDiff
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_is_measurably_generated MeasureTheory.ae_isMeasurablyGenerated
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
#align measure_theory.ae_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union MeasureTheory.measure_union
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union' MeasureTheory.measure_union'
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_inter_add_diff
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_diff_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter'
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union] using measure_union disjoint_sdiff_sdiff (ht.diff hs)
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_compl
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion₀
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion₀
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset₀
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
#align measure_theory.tsum_meas_le_meas_Union_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_null' MeasureTheory.measure_diff_null'
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) : μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union' disjoint_sdiff_right hs, union_diff_self]
#align measure_theory.measure_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_add_diff
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : MeasurableSet t) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
Eq.symm <| ENNReal.sub_eq_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff' MeasureTheory.measure_diff'
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff MeasureTheory.measure_diff
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
#align measure_theory.le_measure_diff MeasureTheory.le_measure_diff
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := (WithTop.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩).symm
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} :
μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
#align measure_theory.measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_compl
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} {t : β → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ b, s b ⊆ t b) (h_le : ∀ b, μ (t b) ≤ μ (s b)) : μ (⋃ b, s b) = μ (⋃ b, t b) := by
rcases Classical.em (∃ b, μ (t b) = ∞) with (⟨b, hb⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ b, s b) = ∞ := top_unique (hb ▸ (h_le b).trans <| measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, t b) := Eq.symm <| top_unique <| hb ▸ measure_mono (subset_iUnion _ _)
push_neg at htop
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono (iUnion_mono hsub)) ?_
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_union_congr_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b, s b) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _b => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _b =>
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_toMeasurable
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_toMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_to_measurable_union MeasureTheory.measure_toMeasurable_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_union_toMeasurable
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i)) (H : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily
-measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
generalize ht : Function.extend Encodable.encode s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion,
iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective, (· ∘ ·), Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty,
measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) ≤ μ (⋃ n, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun i => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
have hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) (Accumulate f) := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rli ↦ le_trans rli rik,
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rlj ↦ le_trans rlj rjk⟩
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd.directed_val, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le _ k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (MeasurableSet.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
· rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· rw [tsub_le_iff_right, ← measure_union, Set.union_comm]
· exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 Subset.rfl)
· apply disjoint_sdiff_left
· apply h i
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
#align measure_theory.measure_Inter_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_iInter_eq_iInf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
let s := fun i ↦ ⋂ j ≤ i, f j
have iInter_eq : ⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i, s i := by
ext x; simp [s]; constructor
· exact fun h _ j _ ↦ h j
· intro h i
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact h j i rij
have ms : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i) :=
fun i ↦ MeasurableSet.biInter (countable_univ.mono <| subset_univ _) fun i _ ↦ h i
have hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biInter_subset_biInter_left fun j rji ↦ le_trans rji rik,
biInter_subset_biInter_left fun i rij ↦ le_trans rij rjk⟩
have hfin' : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞ := by
rcases hfin with ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact ⟨j, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hi <| measure_mono <| biInter_subset_of_mem rij⟩
exact iInter_eq ▸ measure_iInter_eq_iInf ms hd hfin'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Countable ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hm.directed_le]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Union MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup']
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf hs hm.directed_ge hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Inter MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iInter
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ∈ {j | j ≤ i}, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf' hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, MeasurableSet (s r)) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun l hl => ?_, fun L hL => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := Ioi a)] with r hr using hl.trans_le
(measure_mono (biInter_subset_of_mem hr))
obtain ⟨u, u_anti, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ι, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, a < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, ar, _⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' ar with ⟨w, w_anti, w_mem, w_lim⟩
exact ⟨w, w_anti, fun n => (w_mem n).1, w_lim⟩
have A : Tendsto (μ ∘ s ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s (u n)))) := by
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => hs _ (u_pos n)) ?_ ?_
· intro m n hmn
exact hm _ _ (u_pos n) (u_anti.antitone hmn)
· rcases hf with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 r rpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hr.lt_top)⟩
exact measure_mono (hm _ _ (u_pos n) hn.le)
have B : ⋂ n, s (u n) = ⋂ r > a, s r := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro r rpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ rpos).exists
exact Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ n) (hm (u n) r (u_pos n) hn.le)
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro n
apply biInter_subset_of_mem
exact u_pos n
rw [B] at A
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, μ (s (u n)) < L := ((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ hL).exists
have : Ioc a (u n) ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, u_pos n⟩
filter_upwards [this] with r hr using lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (hm _ _ hr.1 hr.2)) hn
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_bInter_gt MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_biInter_gt
/-- One direction of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma** (sometimes called the "*first* Borel-Cantelli
lemma"): if (sᵢ) is a sequence of sets such that `∑ μ sᵢ` is finite, then the limit superior of the
`sᵢ` is a null set.
Note: for the *second* Borel-Cantelli lemma (applying to independent sets in a probability space),
see `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one`. -/
theorem measure_limsup_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (limsup s atTop) = 0 := by
-- First we replace the sequence `sₙ` with a sequence of measurable sets `tₙ ⊇ sₙ` of the same
-- measure.
set t : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (s n)
have ht : (∑' i, μ (t i)) ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [t, measure_toMeasurable] using hs
suffices μ (limsup t atTop) = 0 by
have A : s ≤ t := fun n => subset_toMeasurable μ (s n)
-- TODO default args fail
exact measure_mono_null (limsup_le_limsup (eventually_of_forall (Pi.le_def.mp A))) this
-- Next we unfold `limsup` for sets and replace equality with an inequality
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', Set.iInf_eq_iInter, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, ←
nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
-- Finally, we estimate `μ (⋃ i, t (i + n))` by `∑ i', μ (t (i + n))`
refine
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto'
(tendsto_measure_iInter
(fun i => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) ?_
⟨0, ne_top_of_le_ne_top ht (measure_iUnion_le t)⟩)
(ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add (μ ∘ t) ht) fun n => measure_iUnion_le _
intro n m hnm x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i + (m - n), by simpa only [add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hnm] using hi⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_limsup_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero
theorem measure_liminf_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (liminf s atTop) = 0 := by
rw [← le_zero_iff]
have : liminf s atTop ≤ limsup s atTop := liminf_le_limsup
exact (μ.mono this).trans (by simp [measure_limsup_eq_zero h])
#align measure_theory.measure_liminf_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_liminf_eq_zero
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : limsup (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.limsup_sdiff s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_limsup s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` above because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : liminf (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.liminf_sdiff s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_liminf s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align measure_theory.measure_if MeasureTheory.measure_if
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.to_measure_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.toMeasure_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
#align measure_theory.le_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.le_toMeasure_apply
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply₀ MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply₀
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_to_measure MeasureTheory.toOuterMeasure_toMeasure
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
#align measure_theory.bounded_by_measure MeasureTheory.boundedBy_measure
end OuterMeasure
section
/- Porting note: These variables are wrapped by an anonymous section because they interrupt
synthesizing instances in `MeasureSpace` section. -/
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero [MeasurableSpace α] : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.instZero
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_zero
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.subsingleton MeasureTheory.Measure.instSubsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
#align measure_theory.measure.eq_zero_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty
instance instInhabited [MeasurableSpace α] : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.Measure.instInhabited
instance instAdd [MeasurableSpace α] : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_add MeasureTheory.Measure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.add_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_add
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.add_apply
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul [MeasurableSpace α] : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_apply
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_scalar_tower MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsScalarTower
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsCentralScalar
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instMulAction
instance instAddCommMonoid [MeasurableSpace α] : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.Measure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add_hom MeasureTheory.Measure.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_finset_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.finset_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.finset_sum_apply
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instDistribMulAction
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.module MeasureTheory.Measure.instModule
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, or_iff_right_iff_imp, mul_eq_zero]
simp only [IsEmpty.forall_iff, hc]
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_smul_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_smul_measure_iff
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_left MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_right MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder [MeasurableSpace α] : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl m s := le_rfl
le_trans m₁ m₂ m₃ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
#align measure_theory.measure.partial_order MeasureTheory.Measure.instPartialOrder
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_le MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_le
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff'
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff'
instance covariantAddLE [MeasurableSpace α] :
CovariantClass (Measure α) (Measure α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.covariant_add_le MeasureTheory.Measure.covariantAddLE
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_left MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_left
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_right MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_right
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_caratheodory MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_caratheodory
instance [MeasurableSpace α] : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_apply
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun μ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_semilattice_Inf MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteSemilatticeInf
instance instCompleteLattice [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun μ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_lattice MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteLattice
end sInf
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure_top MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top [MeasurableSpace α] :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_top MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.top_add MeasureTheory.Measure.top_add
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_top MeasureTheory.Measure.add_top
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_le MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_pos
/-! ### Pushforward and pullback -/
/-- Lift a linear map between `OuterMeasure` spaces such that for each measure `μ` every measurable
set is caratheodory-measurable w.r.t. `f μ` to a linear map between `Measure` spaces. -/
def liftLinear {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β)
(hf : ∀ μ : Measure α, ‹_› ≤ (f μ.toOuterMeasure).caratheodory) :
Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β where
toFun μ := (f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure (hf μ)
map_add' μ₁ μ₂ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [map_add, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, toMeasure_apply, add_toOuterMeasure,
OuterMeasure.coe_add, hs]
map_smul' c μ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply,
toMeasure_apply, smul_toOuterMeasure (R := ℝ≥0∞), OuterMeasure.coe_smul (R := ℝ≥0∞),
smul_apply, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear
lemma liftLinear_apply₀ {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (liftLinear f hf μ)) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply₀ _ (hf μ) hs
@[simp]
theorem liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) hs
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear_apply
theorem le_liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) (s : Set β) :
f μ.toOuterMeasure s ≤ liftLinear f hf μ s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) s
#align measure_theory.measure.le_lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_liftLinear_apply
/-- The pushforward of a measure as a linear map. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not
a measurable function. -/
def mapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β :=
if hf : Measurable f then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.map f) fun μ _s hs t =>
le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory μ _ (hf hs) (f ⁻¹' t)
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ
theorem mapₗ_congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
mapₗ f μ = mapₗ g μ := by
ext1 s hs
simpa only [mapₗ, hf, hg, hs, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply, OuterMeasure.map_apply]
using measure_congr (h.preimage s)
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_congr
/-- The pushforward of a measure. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not an almost everywhere
measurable function. -/
irreducible_def map [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Measure β :=
if hf : AEMeasurable f μ then mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.map MeasureTheory.Measure.map
theorem mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ = map f μ := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable
theorem mapₗ_apply_of_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (μ : Measure α) :
mapₗ f μ = map f μ := by
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable]
exact mapₗ_congr hf hf.aemeasurable.measurable_mk hf.aemeasurable.ae_eq_mk
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable
@[simp]
theorem map_add (μ ν : Measure α) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ + ν).map f = μ.map f + ν.map f := by simp [← mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_add MeasureTheory.Measure.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : Measure α).map f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) <;> simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_of_not_aemeasurable {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ¬AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.map f = 0 := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_of_not_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_of_not_aemeasurable
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Measure.map f μ = Measure.map g μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hg : AEMeasurable g μ := hf.congr h
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hg]
exact
mapₗ_congr hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk (hf.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hg.ae_eq_mk))
· have hg : ¬AEMeasurable g μ := by simpa [← aemeasurable_congr h] using hf
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable, hf, hg]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.map_congr
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc); · simp
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hfc : AEMeasurable f (c • μ) :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).2 hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hfc,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply]
congr 1
apply mapₗ_congr hfc.measurable_mk hf.measurable_mk
exact EventuallyEq.trans ((ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk.symm) hf.ae_eq_mk
· have hfc : ¬AEMeasurable f (c • μ) := by
intro hfc
exact hf ⟨hfc.mk f, hfc.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable hf, map_of_not_aemeasurable hfc]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul_nnreal (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f :=
μ.map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) f
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul_nnreal MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul_nnreal
variable {f : α → β}
lemma map_apply₀ {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (map f μ)) : μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map, dif_pos hf, mapₗ, dif_pos hf.measurable_mk] at hs ⊢
rw [liftLinear_apply₀ _ hs, measure_congr (hf.ae_eq_mk.preimage s)]
rfl
/-- We can evaluate the pushforward on measurable sets. For non-measurable sets, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply` and `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := map_apply₀ hf hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable hs
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply
theorem map_toOuterMeasure (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(μ.map f).toOuterMeasure = (OuterMeasure.map f μ.toOuterMeasure).trim := by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_trim_iff]
intro s hs
simp [hf, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.map_toOuterMeasure
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf .univ, preimage_univ]
@[simp] lemma mapₗ_eq_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf, map_eq_zero_iff hf.aemeasurable]
lemma map_ne_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := (map_eq_zero_iff hf).not
lemma mapₗ_ne_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
(mapₗ_eq_zero_iff hf).not
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map id μ = μ :=
ext fun _ => map_apply measurable_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : map (fun x => x) μ = μ :=
map_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id' MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id'
theorem map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.map f).map g = μ.map (g ∘ f) :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hf, hg, hs, hg hs, hg.comp hf, ← preimage_comp]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_map MeasureTheory.Measure.map_map
@[mono]
theorem map_mono {f : α → β} (h : μ ≤ ν) (hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f ≤ ν.map f :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simp [hf.aemeasurable, hs, h _]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.map_mono
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, we can bound `map f μ s` from below.
See also `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
theorem le_map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set β) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ.map f s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ (f ⁻¹' toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) := by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable
_ = μ.map f (toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) :=
(map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf <| measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).symm
_ = μ.map f s := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply
theorem le_map_apply_image {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set α) :
μ s ≤ μ.map f (f '' s) :=
(measure_mono (subset_preimage_image f s)).trans (le_map_apply hf _)
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, `map f μ s = 0` implies that `μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0`. -/
theorem preimage_null_of_map_null {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : μ.map f s = 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp <| (le_map_apply hf s).trans_eq hs
#align measure_theory.measure.preimage_null_of_map_null MeasureTheory.Measure.preimage_null_of_map_null
theorem tendsto_ae_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto f (ae μ) (ae (μ.map f)) :=
fun _ hs => preimage_null_of_map_null hf hs
#align measure_theory.measure.tendsto_ae_map MeasureTheory.Measure.tendsto_ae_map
/-- Pullback of a `Measure` as a linear map. If `f` sends each measurable set to a measurable
set, then for each measurable set `s` we have `comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s)`.
If the linearity is not needed, please use `comap` instead, which works for a larger class of
functions. -/
def comapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure β →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s) then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.comap f) fun μ s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
apply le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
exact hf.2 s hs
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ
theorem comapₗ_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comapₗ, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
exact ⟨hfi, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_apply
/-- Pullback of a `Measure`. If `f` sends each measurable set to a null-measurable set,
then for each measurable set `s` we have `comap f μ s = μ (f '' s)`. -/
def comap [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) : Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ then
(OuterMeasure.comap f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure fun s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
exact (measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ (hf.2 s hs)).symm
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comap
theorem comap_apply₀ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (comap f μ)) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)] at hs ⊢
rw [toMeasure_apply₀ _ _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply₀
theorem le_comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) (s : Set α) :
μ (f '' s) ≤ comap f μ s := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)]
exact le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_comap_apply
theorem comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
comap_apply₀ f μ hfi (fun s hs => (hf s hs).nullMeasurableSet) hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply
theorem comapₗ_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = comap f μ s :=
(comapₗ_apply f hfi hf μ hs).trans (comap_apply f hfi hf μ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_eq_comap
theorem measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
(f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) {s : Set α} (hs : comap f μ s = 0) :
μ (f '' s) = 0 :=
le_antisymm ((le_comap_apply f μ hfi hf s).trans hs.le) (zero_le _)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᵐ[comap f μ] t) : f '' s =ᵐ[μ] f '' t := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff] at hst ⊢
have h_eq_α : { a : α | ¬s a = t a } = s \ t ∪ t \ s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
have h_eq_β : { a : β | ¬(f '' s) a = (f '' t) a } = f '' s \ f '' t ∪ f '' t \ f '' s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
rw [← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_union] at h_eq_β
rw [h_eq_β]
rw [h_eq_α] at hst
exact measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero f μ hfi hf hst
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap
theorem NullMeasurableSet.image {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.comap f)) : NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ := by
refine ⟨toMeasurable μ (f '' toMeasurable (μ.comap f) s), measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _, ?_⟩
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq ?_).symm
swap
· exact hf _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
have h : toMeasurable (comap f μ) s =ᵐ[comap f μ] s :=
NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq hs
exact ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap f μ hfi hf h.symm
#align measure_theory.measure.null_measurable_set.image MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurableSet.image
theorem comap_preimage {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
{s : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (hf' : Measurable f)
(h : ∀ t, MeasurableSet t → NullMeasurableSet (f '' t) μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [comap_apply₀ _ _ hf h (hf' hs).nullMeasurableSet, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_preimage MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_preimage
section Sum
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
#align measure_theory.measure.sum MeasureTheory.Measure.sum
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_sum_apply
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = x₀`. For any Dirac mass
`δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure `sum δ_x`
gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any measurable set
containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one get `sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
#align measure_theory.measure.le_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.le_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply_eq_zero'
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_comm MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_comm
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_sum_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_sum_iff
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_sum_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_sum_iff'
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_fintype MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_fintype
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_coe_finset MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_coe_finset
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_sum_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_sum_eq
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_bool MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_bool
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_cond MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_cond
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_of_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_of_empty
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_add_sum_compl MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_add_sum_compl
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_congr
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_add_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_add_sum
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### Absolute continuity -/
/-- We say that `μ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `ν`, or that `μ` is dominated by `ν`,
if `ν(A) = 0` implies that `μ(A) = 0`. -/
def AbsolutelyContinuous {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, ν s = 0 → μ s = 0
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous]
scoped[MeasureTheory] infixl:50 " ≪ " => MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_le (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≪ ν := fun s hs =>
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| hs ▸ le_iff'.1 h s
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous_of_le MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.absolutelyContinuous := absolutelyContinuous_of_le
#align has_le.le.absolutely_continuous LE.le.absolutelyContinuous
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_eq (h : μ = ν) : μ ≪ ν :=
h.le.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous_of_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_eq
alias _root_.Eq.absolutelyContinuous := absolutelyContinuous_of_eq
#align eq.absolutely_continuous Eq.absolutelyContinuous
namespace AbsolutelyContinuous
theorem mk (h : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet s → ν s = 0 → μ s = 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
intro s hs
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs with ⟨t, h1t, h2t, h3t⟩
exact measure_mono_null h1t (h h2t h3t)
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.mk MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk
@[refl]
protected theorem refl {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ ≪ μ :=
rfl.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.refl MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl
protected theorem rfl : μ ≪ μ := fun _s hs => hs
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.rfl MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
instance instIsRefl [MeasurableSpace α] : IsRefl (Measure α) (· ≪ ·) :=
⟨fun _ => AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.is_refl MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.instIsRefl
@[simp]
protected lemma zero (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≪ μ := fun s _ ↦ by simp
@[trans]
protected theorem trans (h1 : μ₁ ≪ μ₂) (h2 : μ₂ ≪ μ₃) : μ₁ ≪ μ₃ := fun _s hs => h1 <| h2 hs
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.trans MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.trans
@[mono]
protected theorem map (h : μ ≪ ν) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f ≪ ν.map f :=
AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => by simpa [hf, hs] using @h _
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.map MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.map
protected theorem smul [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : μ ≪ ν) (c : R) : c • μ ≪ ν := fun s hνs => by
simp only [h hνs, smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, smul_zero]
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.smul MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.smul
protected lemma add (h1 : μ₁ ≪ ν) (h2 : μ₂ ≪ ν') : μ₁ + μ₂ ≪ ν + ν' := by
intro s hs
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_eq_zero] at hs ⊢
exact ⟨h1 hs.1, h2 hs.2⟩
lemma add_left_iff {μ₁ μ₂ ν : Measure α} :
μ₁ + μ₂ ≪ ν ↔ μ₁ ≪ ν ∧ μ₂ ≪ ν := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ (h.1.add h.2).trans ?_⟩
· have : ∀ s, ν s = 0 → μ₁ s = 0 ∧ μ₂ s = 0 := by intro s hs0; simpa using h hs0
exact ⟨fun s hs0 ↦ (this s hs0).1, fun s hs0 ↦ (this s hs0).2⟩
· have : ν + ν = 2 • ν := by ext; simp [two_mul]
rw [this]
exact AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl.smul 2
lemma add_right (h1 : μ ≪ ν) (ν' : Measure α) : μ ≪ ν + ν' := by
intro s hs
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_eq_zero] at hs ⊢
exact h1 hs.1
end AbsolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
lemma absolutelyContinuous_zero_iff : μ ≪ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ measure_univ_eq_zero.mp (h rfl), fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ AbsolutelyContinuous.zero _⟩
alias absolutelyContinuous_refl := AbsolutelyContinuous.refl
alias absolutelyContinuous_rfl := AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
lemma absolutelyContinuous_sum_left {μs : ι → Measure α} (hμs : ∀ i, μs i ≪ ν) :
Measure.sum μs ≪ ν :=
AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs hs0 ↦ by simp [sum_apply _ hs, fun i ↦ hμs i hs0]
lemma absolutelyContinuous_sum_right {μs : ι → Measure α} (i : ι) (hνμ : ν ≪ μs i) :
ν ≪ Measure.sum μs := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs hs0 ↦ ?_
simp only [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hs0
exact hνμ (hs0 i)
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ) :
μ' ≪ μ :=
(Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le hμ'_le).trans (Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl.smul c)
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous_of_le_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul
lemma smul_absolutelyContinuous {c : ℝ≥0∞} : c • μ ≪ μ := absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul le_rfl
lemma absolutelyContinuous_smul {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : μ ≪ c • μ := by
simp [AbsolutelyContinuous, hc]
theorem ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous : ae μ ≤ ae ν ↔ μ ≪ ν :=
⟨fun h s => by
rw [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem, measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem]
exact fun hs => h hs, fun h s hs => h hs⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_le_iff_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.absolutelyContinuous_of_ae, AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_le⟩ :=
ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous
#align has_le.le.absolutely_continuous_of_ae LE.le.absolutelyContinuous_of_ae
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.ae_le MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_le
alias ae_mono' := AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_le
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_mono' MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_mono'
theorem AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_eq (h : μ ≪ ν) {f g : α → δ} (h' : f =ᵐ[ν] g) : f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.ae_le h'
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_eq
protected theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint.of_absolutelyContinuous
(h : AEDisjoint μ s t) {ν : Measure α} (h' : ν ≪ μ) :
AEDisjoint ν s t := h' h
protected theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint.of_le
(h : AEDisjoint μ s t) {ν : Measure α} (h' : ν ≤ μ) :
AEDisjoint ν s t :=
h.of_absolutelyContinuous (Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le h')
/-! ### Quasi measure preserving maps (a.k.a. non-singular maps) -/
/-- A map `f : α → β` is said to be *quasi measure preserving* (a.k.a. non-singular) w.r.t. measures
`μa` and `μb` if it is measurable and `μb s = 0` implies `μa (f ⁻¹' s) = 0`. -/
structure QuasiMeasurePreserving {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β)
(μa : Measure α := by volume_tac)
(μb : Measure β := by volume_tac) : Prop where
protected measurable : Measurable f
protected absolutelyContinuous : μa.map f ≪ μb
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.measurable
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.absolutelyContinuous
namespace QuasiMeasurePreserving
protected theorem id {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : QuasiMeasurePreserving id μ μ :=
⟨measurable_id, map_id.absolutelyContinuous⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.id MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.id
variable {μa μa' : Measure α} {μb μb' : Measure β} {μc : Measure γ} {f : α → β}
protected theorem _root_.Measurable.quasiMeasurePreserving
{_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : Measurable f) (μ : Measure α) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ (μ.map f) :=
⟨hf, AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl⟩
#align measurable.quasi_measure_preserving Measurable.quasiMeasurePreserving
theorem mono_left (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (ha : μa' ≪ μa) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa' μb :=
⟨h.1, (ha.map h.1).trans h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.mono_left MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.mono_left
theorem mono_right (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (ha : μb ≪ μb') :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb' :=
⟨h.1, h.2.trans ha⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.mono_right MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.mono_right
@[mono]
theorem mono (ha : μa' ≪ μa) (hb : μb ≪ μb') (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa' μb' :=
(h.mono_left ha).mono_right hb
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.mono MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.mono
protected theorem comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : QuasiMeasurePreserving g μb μc)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : QuasiMeasurePreserving (g ∘ f) μa μc :=
⟨hg.measurable.comp hf.measurable, by
rw [← map_map hg.1 hf.1]
exact (hf.2.map hg.1).trans hg.2⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.comp MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.comp
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μa) :
∀ n, QuasiMeasurePreserving f^[n] μa μa
| 0 => QuasiMeasurePreserving.id μa
| n + 1 => (hf.iterate n).comp hf
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.iterate MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.iterate
protected theorem aemeasurable (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : AEMeasurable f μa :=
hf.1.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.aemeasurable
theorem ae_map_le (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : ae (μa.map f) ≤ ae μb :=
h.2.ae_le
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_map_le MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_map_le
theorem tendsto_ae (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : Tendsto f (ae μa) (ae μb) :=
(tendsto_ae_map h.aemeasurable).mono_right h.ae_map_le
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.tendsto_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.tendsto_ae
theorem ae (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) {p : β → Prop} (hg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μb, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μa, p (f x) :=
h.tendsto_ae hg
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae
theorem ae_eq (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) {g₁ g₂ : β → δ} (hg : g₁ =ᵐ[μb] g₂) :
g₁ ∘ f =ᵐ[μa] g₂ ∘ f :=
h.ae hg
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq
theorem preimage_null (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) {s : Set β} (hs : μb s = 0) :
μa (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 :=
preimage_null_of_map_null h.aemeasurable (h.2 hs)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_null MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_null
theorem preimage_mono_ae {s t : Set β} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (h : s ≤ᵐ[μb] t) :
f ⁻¹' s ≤ᵐ[μa] f ⁻¹' t :=
eventually_map.mp <|
Eventually.filter_mono (tendsto_ae_map hf.aemeasurable) (Eventually.filter_mono hf.ae_map_le h)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_mono_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_mono_ae
theorem preimage_ae_eq {s t : Set β} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (h : s =ᵐ[μb] t) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μa] f ⁻¹' t :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm (hf.preimage_mono_ae h.le) (hf.preimage_mono_ae h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_ae_eq
theorem preimage_iterate_ae_eq {s : Set α} {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ) (k : ℕ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) : f^[k] ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
induction' k with k ih; · rfl
rw [iterate_succ, preimage_comp]
exact EventuallyEq.trans (hf.preimage_ae_eq ih) hs
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_iterate_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_iterate_ae_eq
theorem image_zpow_ae_eq {s : Set α} {e : α ≃ α} (he : QuasiMeasurePreserving e μ μ)
(he' : QuasiMeasurePreserving e.symm μ μ) (k : ℤ) (hs : e '' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
(⇑(e ^ k)) '' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage]
obtain ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩ := k.eq_nat_or_neg
· replace hs : (⇑e⁻¹) ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by rwa [Equiv.image_eq_preimage] at hs
replace he' : (⇑e⁻¹)^[k] ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := he'.preimage_iterate_ae_eq k hs
rwa [Equiv.Perm.iterate_eq_pow e⁻¹ k, inv_pow e k] at he'
· rw [zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
replace hs : e ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
convert he.preimage_ae_eq hs.symm
rw [Equiv.preimage_image]
replace he : (⇑e)^[k] ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := he.preimage_iterate_ae_eq k hs
rwa [Equiv.Perm.iterate_eq_pow e k] at he
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.image_zpow_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.image_zpow_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) : limsup (α := Set α) (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) atTop =ᵐ[μ] s :=
haveI : ∀ n, (preimage f)^[n] s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
intro n
induction' n with n ih
· rfl
simpa only [iterate_succ', comp_apply] using ae_eq_trans (hf.ae_eq ih) hs
(limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) this).trans (ae_eq_refl _)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_preimage_iterate_ae_eq {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) : liminf (α := Set α) (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) atTop =ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [← ae_eq_set_compl_compl, @Filter.liminf_compl (Set α)]
rw [← ae_eq_set_compl_compl, ← preimage_compl] at hs
convert hf.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq hs
ext1 n
simp only [← Set.preimage_iterate_eq, comp_apply, preimage_compl]
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.liminf_preimage_iterate_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.liminf_preimage_iterate_ae_eq
/-- By replacing a measurable set that is almost invariant with the `limsup` of its preimages, we
obtain a measurable set that is almost equal and strictly invariant.
(The `liminf` would work just as well.) -/
theorem exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae {f : α → α} (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hs' : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
∃ t : Set α, MeasurableSet t ∧ t =ᵐ[μ] s ∧ f ⁻¹' t = t :=
⟨limsup (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) atTop,
MeasurableSet.measurableSet_limsup fun n =>
preimage_iterate_eq ▸ h.measurable.iterate n hs,
h.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq hs',
Filter.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (CompleteLatticeHom.setPreimage f) s⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ae_eq_of_ae_eq {G α : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α] [MeasurableSpace α]
{s t : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (g : G)
(h_qmp : QuasiMeasurePreserving (g⁻¹ • · : α → α) μ μ)
(h_ae_eq : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : (g • s : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (g • t : Set α) := by
simpa only [← preimage_smul_inv] using h_qmp.ae_eq h_ae_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.smul_ae_eq_of_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.smul_ae_eq_of_ae_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.vadd_ae_eq_of_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.vadd_ae_eq_of_ae_eq
end QuasiMeasurePreserving
section Pointwise
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_one {G α : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
[MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(h_ae_disjoint : ∀ g ≠ (1 : G), AEDisjoint μ (g • s) s)
(h_qmp : ∀ g : G, QuasiMeasurePreserving (g • ·) μ μ) :
Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on fun g : G => g • s) := by
intro g₁ g₂ hg
let g := g₂⁻¹ * g₁
replace hg : g ≠ 1 := by
rw [Ne, inv_mul_eq_one]
exact hg.symm
have : (g₂⁻¹ • ·) ⁻¹' (g • s ∩ s) = g₁ • s ∩ g₂ • s := by
rw [preimage_eq_iff_eq_image (MulAction.bijective g₂⁻¹), image_smul, smul_set_inter, smul_smul,
smul_smul, inv_mul_self, one_smul]
change μ (g₁ • s ∩ g₂ • s) = 0
exact this ▸ (h_qmp g₂⁻¹).preimage_null (h_ae_disjoint g hg)
#align measure_theory.measure.pairwise_ae_disjoint_of_ae_disjoint_forall_ne_one MeasureTheory.Measure.pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_one
#align measure_theory.measure.pairwise_ae_disjoint_of_ae_disjoint_forall_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_zero
end Pointwise
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun t ht s hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.cofinite
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.mem_cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.mem_cofinite
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
#align measure_theory.measure.compl_mem_cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.compl_mem_cofinite
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.eventually_cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.eventually_cofinite
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
#align ae_measurable.null_measurable AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
/-- The preimage of a null measurable set under a (quasi) measure preserving map is a null
measurable set. -/
theorem NullMeasurableSet.preimage {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {t : Set β}
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t ν) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) μ :=
⟨f ⁻¹' toMeasurable ν t, hf.measurable (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
hf.ae_eq ht.toMeasurable_ae_eq.symm⟩
#align measure_theory.null_measurable_set.preimage MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.preimage
theorem NullMeasurableSet.mono_ac (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
NullMeasurableSet s ν :=
h.preimage <| (QuasiMeasurePreserving.id μ).mono_left hle
#align measure_theory.null_measurable_set.mono_ac MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.mono_ac
theorem NullMeasurableSet.mono (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hle : ν ≤ μ) : NullMeasurableSet s ν :=
h.mono_ac hle.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.null_measurable_set.mono MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.mono
theorem AEDisjoint.preimage {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {s t : Set β} (ht : AEDisjoint ν s t)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) : AEDisjoint μ (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf.preimage_null ht
#align measure_theory.ae_disjoint.preimage MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint.preimage
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_bot MeasureTheory.ae_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem ae_neBot : (ae μ).NeBot ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans (not_congr ae_eq_bot)
#align measure_theory.ae_ne_bot MeasureTheory.ae_neBot
instance Measure.ae.neBot [NeZero μ] : (ae μ).NeBot := ae_neBot.2 <| NeZero.ne μ
@[simp]
theorem ae_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} : ae (0 : Measure α) = ⊥ :=
ae_eq_bot.2 rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_zero MeasureTheory.ae_zero
@[mono]
theorem ae_mono (h : μ ≤ ν) : ae μ ≤ ae ν :=
h.absolutelyContinuous.ae_le
#align measure_theory.ae_mono MeasureTheory.ae_mono
theorem mem_ae_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
s ∈ ae (μ.map f) ↔ f ⁻¹' s ∈ ae μ := by
simp only [mem_ae_iff, map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf hs.compl, preimage_compl]
#align measure_theory.mem_ae_map_iff MeasureTheory.mem_ae_map_iff
theorem mem_ae_of_mem_ae_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : s ∈ ae (μ.map f)) : f ⁻¹' s ∈ ae μ :=
(tendsto_ae_map hf).eventually hs
#align measure_theory.mem_ae_of_mem_ae_map MeasureTheory.mem_ae_of_mem_ae_map
theorem ae_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {p : β → Prop}
(hp : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) : (∀ᵐ y ∂μ.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) :=
mem_ae_map_iff hf hp
#align measure_theory.ae_map_iff MeasureTheory.ae_map_iff
theorem ae_of_ae_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ.map f, p y) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p (f x) :=
mem_ae_of_mem_ae_map hf h
#align measure_theory.ae_of_ae_map MeasureTheory.ae_of_ae_map
theorem ae_map_mem_range {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurableSet (range f))
(μ : Measure α) : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.map f, x ∈ range f := by
by_cases h : AEMeasurable f μ
· change range f ∈ ae (μ.map f)
rw [mem_ae_map_iff h hf]
filter_upwards using mem_range_self
· simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable h]
#align measure_theory.ae_map_mem_range MeasureTheory.ae_map_mem_range
section Intervals
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 2,039 | 2,046 | theorem biSup_measure_Iic [Preorder α] {s : Set α} (hsc : s.Countable)
(hst : ∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) :
⨆ x ∈ s, μ (Iic x) = μ univ := by |
rw [← measure_biUnion_eq_iSup hsc]
· congr
simp only [← bex_def] at hst
exact iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 hst
· exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (hdir.directed_val.mono_comp _ fun x y => Iic_subset_Iic.2)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.NatAntidiagonal
#align_import data.finset.nat_antidiagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Antidiagonals in ℕ × ℕ as finsets
This file defines the antidiagonals of ℕ × ℕ as finsets: the `n`-th antidiagonal is the finset of
pairs `(i, j)` such that `i + j = n`. This is useful for polynomial multiplication and more
generally for sums going from `0` to `n`.
## Notes
This refines files `Data.List.NatAntidiagonal` and `Data.Multiset.NatAntidiagonal`, providing an
instance enabling `Finset.antidiagonal` on `Nat`.
-/
open Function
namespace Finset
namespace Nat
/-- The antidiagonal of a natural number `n` is
the finset of pairs `(i, j)` such that `i + j = n`. -/
instance instHasAntidiagonal : HasAntidiagonal ℕ where
antidiagonal n := ⟨Multiset.Nat.antidiagonal n, Multiset.Nat.nodup_antidiagonal n⟩
mem_antidiagonal {n} {xy} := by
rw [mem_def, Multiset.Nat.mem_antidiagonal]
lemma antidiagonal_eq_map (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n = (range (n + 1)).map ⟨fun i ↦ (i, n - i), fun _ _ h ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).1⟩ :=
rfl
lemma antidiagonal_eq_map' (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n =
(range (n + 1)).map ⟨fun i ↦ (n - i, i), fun _ _ h ↦ (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).2⟩ := by
rw [← map_swap_antidiagonal, antidiagonal_eq_map, map_map]; rfl
lemma antidiagonal_eq_image (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n = (range (n + 1)).image fun i ↦ (i, n - i) := by
simp only [antidiagonal_eq_map, map_eq_image, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
lemma antidiagonal_eq_image' (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal n = (range (n + 1)).image fun i ↦ (n - i, i) := by
simp only [antidiagonal_eq_map', map_eq_image, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk]
/-- The cardinality of the antidiagonal of `n` is `n + 1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem card_antidiagonal (n : ℕ) : (antidiagonal n).card = n + 1 := by simp [antidiagonal]
#align finset.nat.card_antidiagonal Finset.Nat.card_antidiagonal
/-- The antidiagonal of `0` is the list `[(0, 0)]` -/
-- nolint as this is for dsimp
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem antidiagonal_zero : antidiagonal 0 = {(0, 0)} := rfl
#align finset.nat.antidiagonal_zero Finset.Nat.antidiagonal_zero
theorem antidiagonal_succ (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal (n + 1) =
cons (0, n + 1)
((antidiagonal n).map
(Embedding.prodMap ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩ (Embedding.refl _)))
(by simp) := by
apply eq_of_veq
rw [cons_val, map_val]
apply Multiset.Nat.antidiagonal_succ
#align finset.nat.antidiagonal_succ Finset.Nat.antidiagonal_succ
theorem antidiagonal_succ' (n : ℕ) :
antidiagonal (n + 1) =
cons (n + 1, 0)
((antidiagonal n).map
(Embedding.prodMap (Embedding.refl _) ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩))
(by simp) := by
apply eq_of_veq
rw [cons_val, map_val]
exact Multiset.Nat.antidiagonal_succ'
#align finset.nat.antidiagonal_succ' Finset.Nat.antidiagonal_succ'
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NatAntidiagonal.lean | 89 | 99 | theorem antidiagonal_succ_succ' {n : ℕ} :
antidiagonal (n + 2) =
cons (0, n + 2)
(cons (n + 2, 0)
((antidiagonal n).map
(Embedding.prodMap ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩
⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩)) <|
by simp)
(by simp) := by |
simp_rw [antidiagonal_succ (n + 1), antidiagonal_succ', Finset.map_cons, map_map]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou, Adam Topaz, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.MooreComplex
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.FunctorCategories
#align_import algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88bca0ce5d22ebfd9e73e682e51d60ea13b48347"
/-!
# The alternating face map complex of a simplicial object in a preadditive category
We construct the alternating face map complex, as a
functor `alternatingFaceMapComplex : SimplicialObject C ⥤ ChainComplex C ℕ`
for any preadditive category `C`. For any simplicial object `X` in `C`,
this is the homological complex `... → X_2 → X_1 → X_0`
where the differentials are alternating sums of faces.
The dual version `alternatingCofaceMapComplex : CosimplicialObject C ⥤ CochainComplex C ℕ`
is also constructed.
We also construct the natural transformation
`inclusionOfMooreComplex : normalizedMooreComplex A ⟶ alternatingFaceMapComplex A`
when `A` is an abelian category.
## References
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0194
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Moore+complex
-/
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Idempotents
open Opposite
open Simplicial
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace AlternatingFaceMapComplex
/-!
## Construction of the alternating face map complex
-/
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C]
variable (X : SimplicialObject C)
variable (Y : SimplicialObject C)
/-- The differential on the alternating face map complex is the alternate
sum of the face maps -/
@[simp]
def objD (n : ℕ) : X _[n + 1] ⟶ X _[n] :=
∑ i : Fin (n + 2), (-1 : ℤ) ^ (i : ℕ) • X.δ i
#align algebraic_topology.alternating_face_map_complex.obj_d AlgebraicTopology.AlternatingFaceMapComplex.objD
/-- ## The chain complex relation `d ≫ d`
-/
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/AlternatingFaceMapComplex.lean | 70 | 112 | theorem d_squared (n : ℕ) : objD X (n + 1) ≫ objD X n = 0 := by |
-- we start by expanding d ≫ d as a double sum
dsimp
simp only [comp_sum, sum_comp, ← Finset.sum_product']
-- then, we decompose the index set P into a subset S and its complement Sᶜ
let P := Fin (n + 2) × Fin (n + 3)
let S := Finset.univ.filter fun ij : P => (ij.2 : ℕ) ≤ (ij.1 : ℕ)
erw [← Finset.sum_add_sum_compl S, ← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← Finset.sum_neg_distrib]
/- we are reduced to showing that two sums are equal, and this is obtained
by constructing a bijection φ : S -> Sᶜ, which maps (i,j) to (j,i+1),
and by comparing the terms -/
let φ : ∀ ij : P, ij ∈ S → P := fun ij hij =>
(Fin.castLT ij.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Finset.mem_filter.mp hij).right (Fin.is_lt ij.1)), ij.1.succ)
apply Finset.sum_bij φ
· -- φ(S) is contained in Sᶜ
intro ij hij
simp only [S, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.compl_filter, Finset.mem_filter, true_and_iff,
Fin.val_succ, Fin.coe_castLT] at hij ⊢
linarith
· -- φ : S → Sᶜ is injective
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij ⟨i', j'⟩ hij' h
rw [Prod.mk.inj_iff]
exact ⟨by simpa using congr_arg Prod.snd h,
by simpa [Fin.castSucc_castLT] using congr_arg Fin.castSucc (congr_arg Prod.fst h)⟩
· -- φ : S → Sᶜ is surjective
rintro ⟨i', j'⟩ hij'
simp only [S, Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Prod.forall, ge_iff_le, Finset.compl_filter,
not_le, Finset.mem_filter, true_and] at hij'
refine ⟨(j'.pred <| ?_, Fin.castSucc i'), ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
simp only [Fin.val_zero, not_lt_zero'] at hij'
· simpa only [S, Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left, Prod.forall, ge_iff_le, Finset.mem_filter,
Fin.coe_castSucc, Fin.coe_pred, true_and] using Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hij'
· simp only [φ, Fin.castLT_castSucc, Fin.succ_pred]
· -- identification of corresponding terms in both sums
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ hij
dsimp
simp only [zsmul_comp, comp_zsmul, smul_smul, ← neg_smul]
congr 1
· simp only [Fin.val_succ, pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg, neg_neg, mul_one]
apply mul_comm
· rw [CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject.δ_comp_δ'']
simpa [S] using hij
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
#align_import model_theory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Structures
This file defines first-order languages and structures in the style of the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/), as well as several important maps between
structures.
## Main Definitions
* A `FirstOrder.Language` defines a language as a pair of functions from the natural numbers to
`Type l`. One sends `n` to the type of `n`-ary functions, and the other sends `n` to the type of
`n`-ary relations.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Structure` interprets the symbols of a given `FirstOrder.Language` in the
context of a given type.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Hom`, denoted `M →[L] N`, is a map from the `L`-structure `M` to the
`L`-structure `N` that commutes with the interpretations of functions, and which preserves the
interpretations of relations (although only in the forward direction).
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Embedding`, denoted `M ↪[L] N`, is an embedding from the `L`-structure `M`
to the `L`-structure `N` that commutes with the interpretations of functions, and which preserves
the interpretations of relations in both directions.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Equiv`, denoted `M ≃[L] N`, is an equivalence from the `L`-structure `M`
to the `L`-structure `N` that commutes with the interpretations of functions, and which preserves
the interpretations of relations in both directions.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u v u' v' w w'
open Cardinal
open Cardinal
namespace FirstOrder
/-! ### Languages and Structures -/
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- A first-order language consists of a type of functions of every natural-number arity and a
type of relations of every natural-number arity. -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
structure Language where
/-- For every arity, a `Type*` of functions of that arity -/
Functions : ℕ → Type u
/-- For every arity, a `Type*` of relations of that arity -/
Relations : ℕ → Type v
#align first_order.language FirstOrder.Language
/-- Used to define `FirstOrder.Language₂`. -/
--@[simp]
def Sequence₂ (a₀ a₁ a₂ : Type u) : ℕ → Type u
| 0 => a₀
| 1 => a₁
| 2 => a₂
| _ => PEmpty
#align first_order.sequence₂ FirstOrder.Sequence₂
namespace Sequence₂
variable (a₀ a₁ a₂ : Type u)
instance inhabited₀ [h : Inhabited a₀] : Inhabited (Sequence₂ a₀ a₁ a₂ 0) :=
h
#align first_order.sequence₂.inhabited₀ FirstOrder.Sequence₂.inhabited₀
instance inhabited₁ [h : Inhabited a₁] : Inhabited (Sequence₂ a₀ a₁ a₂ 1) :=
h
#align first_order.sequence₂.inhabited₁ FirstOrder.Sequence₂.inhabited₁
instance inhabited₂ [h : Inhabited a₂] : Inhabited (Sequence₂ a₀ a₁ a₂ 2) :=
h
#align first_order.sequence₂.inhabited₂ FirstOrder.Sequence₂.inhabited₂
instance {n : ℕ} : IsEmpty (Sequence₂ a₀ a₁ a₂ (n + 3)) := inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk {i : ℕ} :
Cardinal.lift.{v,u} #(Sequence₂ a₀ a₁ a₂ i)
= #(Sequence₂ (ULift.{v,u} a₀) (ULift.{v,u} a₁) (ULift.{v,u} a₂) i) := by
rcases i with (_ | _ | _ | i) <;>
simp only [Sequence₂, mk_uLift, Nat.succ_ne_zero, IsEmpty.forall_iff, Nat.succ.injEq,
add_eq_zero, OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, and_false, one_ne_zero, mk_eq_zero, lift_zero]
#align first_order.sequence₂.lift_mk FirstOrder.Sequence₂.lift_mk
@[simp]
theorem sum_card : Cardinal.sum (fun i => #(Sequence₂ a₀ a₁ a₂ i)) = #a₀ + #a₁ + #a₂ := by
rw [sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ, sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ, sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ]
simp [add_assoc, Sequence₂]
#align first_order.sequence₂.sum_card FirstOrder.Sequence₂.sum_card
end Sequence₂
namespace Language
/-- A constructor for languages with only constants, unary and binary functions, and
unary and binary relations. -/
@[simps]
protected def mk₂ (c f₁ f₂ : Type u) (r₁ r₂ : Type v) : Language :=
⟨Sequence₂ c f₁ f₂, Sequence₂ PEmpty r₁ r₂⟩
#align first_order.language.mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.mk₂
/-- The empty language has no symbols. -/
protected def empty : Language :=
⟨fun _ => Empty, fun _ => Empty⟩
#align first_order.language.empty FirstOrder.Language.empty
instance : Inhabited Language :=
⟨Language.empty⟩
/-- The sum of two languages consists of the disjoint union of their symbols. -/
protected def sum (L : Language.{u, v}) (L' : Language.{u', v'}) : Language :=
⟨fun n => Sum (L.Functions n) (L'.Functions n), fun n => Sum (L.Relations n) (L'.Relations n)⟩
#align first_order.language.sum FirstOrder.Language.sum
variable (L : Language.{u, v})
/-- The type of constants in a given language. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
protected def Constants :=
L.Functions 0
#align first_order.language.constants FirstOrder.Language.Constants
@[simp]
theorem constants_mk₂ (c f₁ f₂ : Type u) (r₁ r₂ : Type v) :
(Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Constants = c :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.constants_mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.constants_mk₂
/-- The type of symbols in a given language. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
def Symbols :=
Sum (Σl, L.Functions l) (Σl, L.Relations l)
#align first_order.language.symbols FirstOrder.Language.Symbols
/-- The cardinality of a language is the cardinality of its type of symbols. -/
def card : Cardinal :=
#L.Symbols
#align first_order.language.card FirstOrder.Language.card
/-- A language is relational when it has no function symbols. -/
class IsRelational : Prop where
/-- There are no function symbols in the language. -/
empty_functions : ∀ n, IsEmpty (L.Functions n)
#align first_order.language.is_relational FirstOrder.Language.IsRelational
/-- A language is algebraic when it has no relation symbols. -/
class IsAlgebraic : Prop where
/-- There are no relation symbols in the language. -/
empty_relations : ∀ n, IsEmpty (L.Relations n)
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic FirstOrder.Language.IsAlgebraic
variable {L} {L' : Language.{u', v'}}
theorem card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations :
L.card =
(Cardinal.sum fun l => Cardinal.lift.{v} #(L.Functions l)) +
Cardinal.sum fun l => Cardinal.lift.{u} #(L.Relations l) := by
simp [card, Symbols]
#align first_order.language.card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations FirstOrder.Language.card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations
instance [L.IsRelational] {n : ℕ} : IsEmpty (L.Functions n) :=
IsRelational.empty_functions n
instance [L.IsAlgebraic] {n : ℕ} : IsEmpty (L.Relations n) :=
IsAlgebraic.empty_relations n
instance isRelational_of_empty_functions {symb : ℕ → Type*} :
IsRelational ⟨fun _ => Empty, symb⟩ :=
⟨fun _ => instIsEmptyEmpty⟩
#align first_order.language.is_relational_of_empty_functions FirstOrder.Language.isRelational_of_empty_functions
instance isAlgebraic_of_empty_relations {symb : ℕ → Type*} : IsAlgebraic ⟨symb, fun _ => Empty⟩ :=
⟨fun _ => instIsEmptyEmpty⟩
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic_of_empty_relations FirstOrder.Language.isAlgebraic_of_empty_relations
instance isRelational_empty : IsRelational Language.empty :=
Language.isRelational_of_empty_functions
#align first_order.language.is_relational_empty FirstOrder.Language.isRelational_empty
instance isAlgebraic_empty : IsAlgebraic Language.empty :=
Language.isAlgebraic_of_empty_relations
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic_empty FirstOrder.Language.isAlgebraic_empty
instance isRelational_sum [L.IsRelational] [L'.IsRelational] : IsRelational (L.sum L') :=
⟨fun _ => instIsEmptySum⟩
#align first_order.language.is_relational_sum FirstOrder.Language.isRelational_sum
instance isAlgebraic_sum [L.IsAlgebraic] [L'.IsAlgebraic] : IsAlgebraic (L.sum L') :=
⟨fun _ => instIsEmptySum⟩
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic_sum FirstOrder.Language.isAlgebraic_sum
instance isRelational_mk₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} [h0 : IsEmpty c] [h1 : IsEmpty f₁]
[h2 : IsEmpty f₂] : IsRelational (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂) :=
⟨fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n h0 fun n => Nat.casesOn n h1 fun n => Nat.casesOn n h2 fun _ =>
inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)⟩
#align first_order.language.is_relational_mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.isRelational_mk₂
instance isAlgebraic_mk₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} [h1 : IsEmpty r₁] [h2 : IsEmpty r₂] :
IsAlgebraic (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂) :=
⟨fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n h1 fun n => Nat.casesOn n h2 fun _ => inferInstanceAs (IsEmpty PEmpty)⟩
#align first_order.language.is_algebraic_mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.isAlgebraic_mk₂
instance subsingleton_mk₂_functions {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} [h0 : Subsingleton c]
[h1 : Subsingleton f₁] [h2 : Subsingleton f₂] {n : ℕ} :
Subsingleton ((Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Functions n) :=
Nat.casesOn n h0 fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n h1 fun n => Nat.casesOn n h2 fun _ => ⟨fun x => PEmpty.elim x⟩
#align first_order.language.subsingleton_mk₂_functions FirstOrder.Language.subsingleton_mk₂_functions
instance subsingleton_mk₂_relations {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} [h1 : Subsingleton r₁]
[h2 : Subsingleton r₂] {n : ℕ} : Subsingleton ((Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Relations n) :=
Nat.casesOn n ⟨fun x => PEmpty.elim x⟩ fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n h1 fun n => Nat.casesOn n h2 fun _ => ⟨fun x => PEmpty.elim x⟩
#align first_order.language.subsingleton_mk₂_relations FirstOrder.Language.subsingleton_mk₂_relations
@[simp]
theorem empty_card : Language.empty.card = 0 := by simp [card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations]
#align first_order.language.empty_card FirstOrder.Language.empty_card
instance isEmpty_empty : IsEmpty Language.empty.Symbols := by
simp only [Language.Symbols, isEmpty_sum, isEmpty_sigma]
exact ⟨fun _ => inferInstance, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align first_order.language.is_empty_empty FirstOrder.Language.isEmpty_empty
instance Countable.countable_functions [h : Countable L.Symbols] : Countable (Σl, L.Functions l) :=
@Function.Injective.countable _ _ h _ Sum.inl_injective
#align first_order.language.countable.countable_functions FirstOrder.Language.Countable.countable_functions
@[simp]
theorem card_functions_sum (i : ℕ) :
#((L.sum L').Functions i)
= (Cardinal.lift.{u'} #(L.Functions i) + Cardinal.lift.{u} #(L'.Functions i) : Cardinal) := by
simp [Language.sum]
#align first_order.language.card_functions_sum FirstOrder.Language.card_functions_sum
@[simp]
theorem card_relations_sum (i : ℕ) :
#((L.sum L').Relations i) =
Cardinal.lift.{v'} #(L.Relations i) + Cardinal.lift.{v} #(L'.Relations i) := by
simp [Language.sum]
#align first_order.language.card_relations_sum FirstOrder.Language.card_relations_sum
@[simp]
theorem card_sum :
(L.sum L').card = Cardinal.lift.{max u' v'} L.card + Cardinal.lift.{max u v} L'.card := by
simp only [card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations, card_functions_sum, card_relations_sum,
sum_add_distrib', lift_add, lift_sum, lift_lift]
simp only [add_assoc, add_comm (Cardinal.sum fun i => (#(L'.Functions i)).lift)]
#align first_order.language.card_sum FirstOrder.Language.card_sum
@[simp]
theorem card_mk₂ (c f₁ f₂ : Type u) (r₁ r₂ : Type v) :
(Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).card =
Cardinal.lift.{v} #c + Cardinal.lift.{v} #f₁ + Cardinal.lift.{v} #f₂ +
Cardinal.lift.{u} #r₁ + Cardinal.lift.{u} #r₂ := by
simp [card_eq_card_functions_add_card_relations, add_assoc]
#align first_order.language.card_mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.card_mk₂
variable (L) (M : Type w)
/-- A first-order structure on a type `M` consists of interpretations of all the symbols in a given
language. Each function of arity `n` is interpreted as a function sending tuples of length `n`
(modeled as `(Fin n → M)`) to `M`, and a relation of arity `n` is a function from tuples of length
`n` to `Prop`. -/
@[ext]
class Structure where
/-- Interpretation of the function symbols -/
funMap : ∀ {n}, L.Functions n → (Fin n → M) → M
/-- Interpretation of the relation symbols -/
RelMap : ∀ {n}, L.Relations n → (Fin n → M) → Prop
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure FirstOrder.Language.Structure
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.fun_map FirstOrder.Language.Structure.funMap
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.rel_map FirstOrder.Language.Structure.RelMap
variable (N : Type w') [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N]
open Structure
/-- Used for defining `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.ModelType.instInhabited`. -/
def Inhabited.trivialStructure {α : Type*} [Inhabited α] : L.Structure α :=
⟨default, default⟩
#align first_order.language.inhabited.trivial_structure FirstOrder.Language.Inhabited.trivialStructure
/-! ### Maps -/
/-- A homomorphism between first-order structures is a function that commutes with the
interpretations of functions and maps tuples in one structure where a given relation is true to
tuples in the second structure where that relation is still true. -/
structure Hom where
/-- The underlying function of a homomorphism of structures -/
toFun : M → N
/-- The homomorphism commutes with the interpretations of the function symbols -/
-- Porting note:
-- The autoparam here used to be `obviously`. We would like to replace it with `aesop`
-- but that isn't currently sufficient.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Aesop.20and.20cases
-- If that can be improved, we should change this to `by aesop` and remove the proofs below.
map_fun' : ∀ {n} (f : L.Functions n) (x), toFun (funMap f x) = funMap f (toFun ∘ x) := by
intros; trivial
/-- The homomorphism sends related elements to related elements -/
map_rel' : ∀ {n} (r : L.Relations n) (x), RelMap r x → RelMap r (toFun ∘ x) := by
-- Porting note: see porting note on `Hom.map_fun'`
intros; trivial
#align first_order.language.hom FirstOrder.Language.Hom
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FirstOrder] notation:25 A " →[" L "] " B => FirstOrder.Language.Hom L A B
/-- An embedding of first-order structures is an embedding that commutes with the
interpretations of functions and relations. -/
structure Embedding extends M ↪ N where
map_fun' : ∀ {n} (f : L.Functions n) (x), toFun (funMap f x) = funMap f (toFun ∘ x) := by
-- Porting note: see porting note on `Hom.map_fun'`
intros; trivial
map_rel' : ∀ {n} (r : L.Relations n) (x), RelMap r (toFun ∘ x) ↔ RelMap r x := by
-- Porting note: see porting note on `Hom.map_fun'`
intros; trivial
#align first_order.language.embedding FirstOrder.Language.Embedding
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FirstOrder] notation:25 A " ↪[" L "] " B => FirstOrder.Language.Embedding L A B
/-- An equivalence of first-order structures is an equivalence that commutes with the
interpretations of functions and relations. -/
structure Equiv extends M ≃ N where
map_fun' : ∀ {n} (f : L.Functions n) (x), toFun (funMap f x) = funMap f (toFun ∘ x) := by
-- Porting note: see porting note on `Hom.map_fun'`
intros; trivial
map_rel' : ∀ {n} (r : L.Relations n) (x), RelMap r (toFun ∘ x) ↔ RelMap r x := by
-- Porting note: see porting note on `Hom.map_fun'`
intros; trivial
#align first_order.language.equiv FirstOrder.Language.Equiv
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FirstOrder] notation:25 A " ≃[" L "] " B => FirstOrder.Language.Equiv L A B
-- Porting note: was [L.Structure P] and [L.Structure Q]
-- The former reported an error.
variable {L M N} {P : Type*} [Structure L P] {Q : Type*} [Structure L Q]
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Interpretation of a constant symbol -/
@[coe]
def constantMap (c : L.Constants) : M := funMap c default
instance : CoeTC L.Constants M :=
⟨constantMap⟩
theorem funMap_eq_coe_constants {c : L.Constants} {x : Fin 0 → M} : funMap c x = c :=
congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)
#align first_order.language.fun_map_eq_coe_constants FirstOrder.Language.funMap_eq_coe_constants
/-- Given a language with a nonempty type of constants, any structure will be nonempty. This cannot
be a global instance, because `L` becomes a metavariable. -/
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_constants [h : Nonempty L.Constants] : Nonempty M :=
h.map (↑)
#align first_order.language.nonempty_of_nonempty_constants FirstOrder.Language.nonempty_of_nonempty_constants
/-- The function map for `FirstOrder.Language.Structure₂`. -/
def funMap₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} (c' : c → M) (f₁' : f₁ → M → M)
(f₂' : f₂ → M → M → M) : ∀ {n}, (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Functions n → (Fin n → M) → M
| 0, f, _ => c' f
| 1, f, x => f₁' f (x 0)
| 2, f, x => f₂' f (x 0) (x 1)
| _ + 3, f, _ => PEmpty.elim f
#align first_order.language.fun_map₂ FirstOrder.Language.funMap₂
/-- The relation map for `FirstOrder.Language.Structure₂`. -/
def RelMap₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} (r₁' : r₁ → Set M) (r₂' : r₂ → M → M → Prop) :
∀ {n}, (Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Relations n → (Fin n → M) → Prop
| 0, r, _ => PEmpty.elim r
| 1, r, x => x 0 ∈ r₁' r
| 2, r, x => r₂' r (x 0) (x 1)
| _ + 3, r, _ => PEmpty.elim r
#align first_order.language.rel_map₂ FirstOrder.Language.RelMap₂
/-- A structure constructor to match `FirstOrder.Language₂`. -/
protected def Structure.mk₂ {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v} (c' : c → M) (f₁' : f₁ → M → M)
(f₂' : f₂ → M → M → M) (r₁' : r₁ → Set M) (r₂' : r₂ → M → M → Prop) :
(Language.mk₂ c f₁ f₂ r₁ r₂).Structure M :=
⟨funMap₂ c' f₁' f₂', RelMap₂ r₁' r₂'⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.mk₂ FirstOrder.Language.Structure.mk₂
namespace Structure
variable {c f₁ f₂ : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Type v}
variable {c' : c → M} {f₁' : f₁ → M → M} {f₂' : f₂ → M → M → M}
variable {r₁' : r₁ → Set M} {r₂' : r₂ → M → M → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem funMap_apply₀ (c₀ : c) {x : Fin 0 → M} :
@Structure.funMap _ M (Structure.mk₂ c' f₁' f₂' r₁' r₂') 0 c₀ x = c' c₀ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.fun_map_apply₀ FirstOrder.Language.Structure.funMap_apply₀
@[simp]
theorem funMap_apply₁ (f : f₁) (x : M) :
@Structure.funMap _ M (Structure.mk₂ c' f₁' f₂' r₁' r₂') 1 f ![x] = f₁' f x :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.fun_map_apply₁ FirstOrder.Language.Structure.funMap_apply₁
@[simp]
theorem funMap_apply₂ (f : f₂) (x y : M) :
@Structure.funMap _ M (Structure.mk₂ c' f₁' f₂' r₁' r₂') 2 f ![x, y] = f₂' f x y :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.fun_map_apply₂ FirstOrder.Language.Structure.funMap_apply₂
@[simp]
theorem relMap_apply₁ (r : r₁) (x : M) :
@Structure.RelMap _ M (Structure.mk₂ c' f₁' f₂' r₁' r₂') 1 r ![x] = (x ∈ r₁' r) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.rel_map_apply₁ FirstOrder.Language.Structure.relMap_apply₁
@[simp]
theorem relMap_apply₂ (r : r₂) (x y : M) :
@Structure.RelMap _ M (Structure.mk₂ c' f₁' f₂' r₁' r₂') 2 r ![x, y] = r₂' r x y :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Structure.rel_map_apply₂ FirstOrder.Language.Structure.relMap_apply₂
end Structure
/-- `HomClass L F M N` states that `F` is a type of `L`-homomorphisms. You should extend this
typeclass when you extend `FirstOrder.Language.Hom`. -/
class HomClass (L : outParam Language) (F M N : Type*)
[FunLike F M N] [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] : Prop where
map_fun : ∀ (φ : F) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (x), φ (funMap f x) = funMap f (φ ∘ x)
map_rel : ∀ (φ : F) {n} (r : L.Relations n) (x), RelMap r x → RelMap r (φ ∘ x)
#align first_order.language.hom_class FirstOrder.Language.HomClass
/-- `StrongHomClass L F M N` states that `F` is a type of `L`-homomorphisms which preserve
relations in both directions. -/
class StrongHomClass (L : outParam Language) (F M N : Type*)
[FunLike F M N] [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] : Prop where
map_fun : ∀ (φ : F) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (x), φ (funMap f x) = funMap f (φ ∘ x)
map_rel : ∀ (φ : F) {n} (r : L.Relations n) (x), RelMap r (φ ∘ x) ↔ RelMap r x
#align first_order.language.strong_hom_class FirstOrder.Language.StrongHomClass
-- Porting note: using implicit brackets for `Structure` arguments
instance (priority := 100) StrongHomClass.homClass [L.Structure M]
[L.Structure N] [FunLike F M N] [StrongHomClass L F M N] : HomClass L F M N where
map_fun := StrongHomClass.map_fun
map_rel φ _ R x := (StrongHomClass.map_rel φ R x).2
#align first_order.language.strong_hom_class.hom_class FirstOrder.Language.StrongHomClass.homClass
/-- Not an instance to avoid a loop. -/
theorem HomClass.strongHomClassOfIsAlgebraic [L.IsAlgebraic] {F M N} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N]
[FunLike F M N] [HomClass L F M N] : StrongHomClass L F M N where
map_fun := HomClass.map_fun
map_rel _ n R _ := (IsAlgebraic.empty_relations n).elim R
#align first_order.language.hom_class.strong_hom_class_of_is_algebraic FirstOrder.Language.HomClass.strongHomClassOfIsAlgebraic
theorem HomClass.map_constants {F M N} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [FunLike F M N]
[HomClass L F M N] (φ : F) (c : L.Constants) : φ c = c :=
(HomClass.map_fun φ c default).trans (congr rfl (funext default))
#align first_order.language.hom_class.map_constants FirstOrder.Language.HomClass.map_constants
attribute [inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.Hom.map_fun'] FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.map_fun'
FirstOrder.Language.HomClass.map_fun FirstOrder.Language.StrongHomClass.map_fun
FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.map_fun'
attribute [inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.Hom.map_rel'] FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.map_rel'
FirstOrder.Language.HomClass.map_rel FirstOrder.Language.StrongHomClass.map_rel
FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.map_rel'
namespace Hom
instance instFunLike : FunLike (M →[L] N) M N where
coe := Hom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; cases h; rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.fun_like FirstOrder.Language.Hom.instFunLike
instance homClass : HomClass L (M →[L] N) M N where
map_fun := map_fun'
map_rel := map_rel'
#align first_order.language.hom.hom_class FirstOrder.Language.Hom.homClass
instance [L.IsAlgebraic] : StrongHomClass L (M →[L] N) M N :=
HomClass.strongHomClassOfIsAlgebraic
instance hasCoeToFun : CoeFun (M →[L] N) fun _ => M → N :=
DFunLike.hasCoeToFun
#align first_order.language.hom.has_coe_to_fun FirstOrder.Language.Hom.hasCoeToFun
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : M →[L] N} : f.toFun = (f : M → N) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.to_fun_eq_coe FirstOrder.Language.Hom.toFun_eq_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : M →[L] N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align first_order.language.hom.ext FirstOrder.Language.Hom.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : M →[L] N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align first_order.language.hom.ext_iff FirstOrder.Language.Hom.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_fun (φ : M →[L] N) {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → M) :
φ (funMap f x) = funMap f (φ ∘ x) :=
HomClass.map_fun φ f x
#align first_order.language.hom.map_fun FirstOrder.Language.Hom.map_fun
@[simp]
theorem map_constants (φ : M →[L] N) (c : L.Constants) : φ c = c :=
HomClass.map_constants φ c
#align first_order.language.hom.map_constants FirstOrder.Language.Hom.map_constants
@[simp]
theorem map_rel (φ : M →[L] N) {n : ℕ} (r : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M) :
RelMap r x → RelMap r (φ ∘ x) :=
HomClass.map_rel φ r x
#align first_order.language.hom.map_rel FirstOrder.Language.Hom.map_rel
variable (L) (M)
/-- The identity map from a structure to itself. -/
@[refl]
def id : M →[L] M where
toFun m := m
#align first_order.language.hom.id FirstOrder.Language.Hom.id
variable {L} {M}
instance : Inhabited (M →[L] M) :=
⟨id L M⟩
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (x : M) : id L M x = x :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.id_apply FirstOrder.Language.Hom.id_apply
/-- Composition of first-order homomorphisms. -/
@[trans]
def comp (hnp : N →[L] P) (hmn : M →[L] N) : M →[L] P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
-- Porting note: should be done by autoparam?
map_fun' _ _ := by simp; rfl
-- Porting note: should be done by autoparam?
map_rel' _ _ h := map_rel _ _ _ (map_rel _ _ _ h)
#align first_order.language.hom.comp FirstOrder.Language.Hom.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (g : N →[L] P) (f : M →[L] N) (x : M) : g.comp f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.comp_apply FirstOrder.Language.Hom.comp_apply
/-- Composition of first-order homomorphisms is associative. -/
theorem comp_assoc (f : M →[L] N) (g : N →[L] P) (h : P →[L] Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.hom.comp_assoc FirstOrder.Language.Hom.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (f : M →[L] N) : f.comp (id L M) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem id_comp (f : M →[L] N) : (id L N).comp f = f :=
rfl
end Hom
/-- Any element of a `HomClass` can be realized as a first_order homomorphism. -/
def HomClass.toHom {F M N} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [FunLike F M N]
[HomClass L F M N] : F → M →[L] N := fun φ =>
⟨φ, HomClass.map_fun φ, HomClass.map_rel φ⟩
#align first_order.language.hom_class.to_hom FirstOrder.Language.HomClass.toHom
namespace Embedding
instance funLike : FunLike (M ↪[L] N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
congr
ext x
exact Function.funext_iff.1 h x
instance embeddingLike : EmbeddingLike (M ↪[L] N) M N where
injective' f := f.toEmbedding.injective
#align first_order.language.embedding.embedding_like FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.embeddingLike
instance strongHomClass : StrongHomClass L (M ↪[L] N) M N where
map_fun := map_fun'
map_rel := map_rel'
#align first_order.language.embedding.strong_hom_class FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.strongHomClass
#noalign first_order.language.embedding.has_coe_to_fun -- Porting note: replaced by funLike instance
@[simp]
theorem map_fun (φ : M ↪[L] N) {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → M) :
φ (funMap f x) = funMap f (φ ∘ x) :=
HomClass.map_fun φ f x
#align first_order.language.embedding.map_fun FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.map_fun
@[simp]
theorem map_constants (φ : M ↪[L] N) (c : L.Constants) : φ c = c :=
HomClass.map_constants φ c
#align first_order.language.embedding.map_constants FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.map_constants
@[simp]
theorem map_rel (φ : M ↪[L] N) {n : ℕ} (r : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M) :
RelMap r (φ ∘ x) ↔ RelMap r x :=
StrongHomClass.map_rel φ r x
#align first_order.language.embedding.map_rel FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.map_rel
/-- A first-order embedding is also a first-order homomorphism. -/
def toHom : (M ↪[L] N) → M →[L] N :=
HomClass.toHom
#align first_order.language.embedding.to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.toHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHom {f : M ↪[L] N} : (f.toHom : M → N) = f :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.embedding.coe_to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.coe_toHom
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (M ↪[L] N) (M → N) (↑)
| f, g, h => by
cases f
cases g
congr
ext x
exact Function.funext_iff.1 h x
#align first_order.language.embedding.coe_injective FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : M ↪[L] N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_injective (funext h)
#align first_order.language.embedding.ext FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : M ↪[L] N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext h⟩
#align first_order.language.embedding.ext_iff FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.ext_iff
theorem toHom_injective : @Function.Injective (M ↪[L] N) (M →[L] N) (·.toHom) := by
intro f f' h
ext
exact congr_fun (congr_arg (↑) h) _
@[simp]
theorem toHom_inj {f g : M ↪[L] N} : f.toHom = g.toHom ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h ↦ toHom_injective h, fun h ↦ congr_arg (·.toHom) h⟩
theorem injective (f : M ↪[L] N) : Function.Injective f :=
f.toEmbedding.injective
#align first_order.language.embedding.injective FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.injective
/-- In an algebraic language, any injective homomorphism is an embedding. -/
@[simps!]
def ofInjective [L.IsAlgebraic] {f : M →[L] N} (hf : Function.Injective f) : M ↪[L] N :=
{ f with
inj' := hf
map_rel' := fun {_} r x => StrongHomClass.map_rel f r x }
#align first_order.language.embedding.of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.ofInjective
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_ofInjective [L.IsAlgebraic] {f : M →[L] N} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(ofInjective hf : M → N) = f :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.embedding.coe_fn_of_injective FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.coeFn_ofInjective
@[simp]
theorem ofInjective_toHom [L.IsAlgebraic] {f : M →[L] N} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(ofInjective hf).toHom = f := by
ext; simp
#align first_order.language.embedding.of_injective_to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.ofInjective_toHom
variable (L) (M)
/-- The identity embedding from a structure to itself. -/
@[refl]
def refl : M ↪[L] M where toEmbedding := Function.Embedding.refl M
#align first_order.language.embedding.refl FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.refl
variable {L} {M}
instance : Inhabited (M ↪[L] M) :=
⟨refl L M⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (x : M) : refl L M x = x :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.embedding.refl_apply FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.refl_apply
/-- Composition of first-order embeddings. -/
@[trans]
def comp (hnp : N ↪[L] P) (hmn : M ↪[L] N) : M ↪[L] P where
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
inj' := hnp.injective.comp hmn.injective
-- Porting note: should be done by autoparam?
map_fun' := by intros; simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_fun]; trivial
-- Porting note: should be done by autoparam?
map_rel' := by intros; rw [Function.comp.assoc, map_rel, map_rel]
#align first_order.language.embedding.comp FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (g : N ↪[L] P) (f : M ↪[L] N) (x : M) : g.comp f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.embedding.comp_apply FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.comp_apply
/-- Composition of first-order embeddings is associative. -/
theorem comp_assoc (f : M ↪[L] N) (g : N ↪[L] P) (h : P ↪[L] Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.embedding.comp_assoc FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.comp_assoc
theorem comp_injective (h : N ↪[L] P) :
Function.Injective (h.comp : (M ↪[L] N) → (M ↪[L] P)) := by
intro f g hfg
ext x; exact h.injective (DFunLike.congr_fun hfg x)
@[simp]
theorem comp_inj (h : N ↪[L] P) (f g : M ↪[L] N) : h.comp f = h.comp g ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun eq ↦ h.comp_injective eq, congr_arg h.comp⟩
theorem toHom_comp_injective (h : N ↪[L] P) :
Function.Injective (h.toHom.comp : (M →[L] N) → (M →[L] P)) := by
intro f g hfg
ext x; exact h.injective (DFunLike.congr_fun hfg x)
@[simp]
theorem toHom_comp_inj (h : N ↪[L] P) (f g : M →[L] N) : h.toHom.comp f = h.toHom.comp g ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun eq ↦ h.toHom_comp_injective eq, congr_arg h.toHom.comp⟩
@[simp]
theorem comp_toHom (hnp : N ↪[L] P) (hmn : M ↪[L] N) :
(hnp.comp hmn).toHom = hnp.toHom.comp hmn.toHom :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.embedding.comp_to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.comp_toHom
@[simp]
theorem comp_refl (f : M ↪[L] N) : f.comp (refl L M) = f := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_comp (f : M ↪[L] N) : (refl L N).comp f = f := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_toHom : (refl L M).toHom = Hom.id L M :=
rfl
end Embedding
/-- Any element of an injective `StrongHomClass` can be realized as a first_order embedding. -/
def StrongHomClass.toEmbedding {F M N} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [FunLike F M N]
[EmbeddingLike F M N] [StrongHomClass L F M N] : F → M ↪[L] N := fun φ =>
⟨⟨φ, EmbeddingLike.injective φ⟩, StrongHomClass.map_fun φ, StrongHomClass.map_rel φ⟩
#align first_order.language.strong_hom_class.to_embedding FirstOrder.Language.StrongHomClass.toEmbedding
namespace Equiv
instance : EquivLike (M ≃[L] N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
inv f := f.invFun
left_inv f := f.left_inv
right_inv f := f.right_inv
coe_injective' f g h₁ h₂ := by
cases f
cases g
simp only [mk.injEq]
ext x
exact Function.funext_iff.1 h₁ x
instance : StrongHomClass L (M ≃[L] N) M N where
map_fun := map_fun'
map_rel := map_rel'
/-- The inverse of a first-order equivalence is a first-order equivalence. -/
@[symm]
def symm (f : M ≃[L] N) : N ≃[L] M :=
{ f.toEquiv.symm with
map_fun' := fun n f' {x} => by
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe]
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_eq]
refine Eq.trans ?_ (f.map_fun' f' (f.toEquiv.symm ∘ x)).symm
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.self_comp_symm, Function.id_comp]
map_rel' := fun n r {x} => by
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe]
refine (f.map_rel' r (f.toEquiv.symm ∘ x)).symm.trans ?_
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.self_comp_symm, Function.id_comp] }
#align first_order.language.equiv.symm FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.symm
instance hasCoeToFun : CoeFun (M ≃[L] N) fun _ => M → N :=
DFunLike.hasCoeToFun
#align first_order.language.equiv.has_coe_to_fun FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.hasCoeToFun
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (f : M ≃[L] N) :
f.symm.symm = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (f : M ≃[L] N) (a : N) : f (f.symm a) = a :=
f.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply a
#align first_order.language.equiv.apply_symm_apply FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (f : M ≃[L] N) (a : M) : f.symm (f a) = a :=
f.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply a
#align first_order.language.equiv.symm_apply_apply FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.symm_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem map_fun (φ : M ≃[L] N) {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → M) :
φ (funMap f x) = funMap f (φ ∘ x) :=
HomClass.map_fun φ f x
#align first_order.language.equiv.map_fun FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.map_fun
@[simp]
theorem map_constants (φ : M ≃[L] N) (c : L.Constants) : φ c = c :=
HomClass.map_constants φ c
#align first_order.language.equiv.map_constants FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.map_constants
@[simp]
theorem map_rel (φ : M ≃[L] N) {n : ℕ} (r : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M) :
RelMap r (φ ∘ x) ↔ RelMap r x :=
StrongHomClass.map_rel φ r x
#align first_order.language.equiv.map_rel FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.map_rel
/-- A first-order equivalence is also a first-order embedding. -/
def toEmbedding : (M ≃[L] N) → M ↪[L] N :=
StrongHomClass.toEmbedding
#align first_order.language.equiv.to_embedding FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.toEmbedding
/-- A first-order equivalence is also a first-order homomorphism. -/
def toHom : (M ≃[L] N) → M →[L] N :=
HomClass.toHom
#align first_order.language.equiv.to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.toHom
@[simp]
theorem toEmbedding_toHom (f : M ≃[L] N) : f.toEmbedding.toHom = f.toHom :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.equiv.to_embedding_to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.toEmbedding_toHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHom {f : M ≃[L] N} : (f.toHom : M → N) = (f : M → N) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.equiv.coe_to_hom FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.coe_toHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_toEmbedding (f : M ≃[L] N) : (f.toEmbedding : M → N) = (f : M → N) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.equiv.coe_to_embedding FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.coe_toEmbedding
theorem injective_toEmbedding : Function.Injective (toEmbedding : (M ≃[L] N) → M ↪[L] N) := by
intro _ _ h; apply DFunLike.coe_injective; exact congr_arg (DFunLike.coe ∘ Embedding.toHom) h
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (M ≃[L] N) (M → N) (↑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
#align first_order.language.equiv.coe_injective FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : M ≃[L] N⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
coe_injective (funext h)
#align first_order.language.equiv.ext FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : M ≃[L] N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ rfl, fun h => ext h⟩
#align first_order.language.equiv.ext_iff FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.ext_iff
theorem bijective (f : M ≃[L] N) : Function.Bijective f :=
EquivLike.bijective f
#align first_order.language.equiv.bijective FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.bijective
theorem injective (f : M ≃[L] N) : Function.Injective f :=
EquivLike.injective f
#align first_order.language.equiv.injective FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.injective
theorem surjective (f : M ≃[L] N) : Function.Surjective f :=
EquivLike.surjective f
#align first_order.language.equiv.surjective FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.surjective
variable (L) (M)
/-- The identity equivalence from a structure to itself. -/
@[refl]
def refl : M ≃[L] M where toEquiv := _root_.Equiv.refl M
#align first_order.language.equiv.refl FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.refl
variable {L} {M}
instance : Inhabited (M ≃[L] M) :=
⟨refl L M⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_apply (x : M) : refl L M x = x := by simp [refl]; rfl
#align first_order.language.equiv.refl_apply FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.refl_apply
/-- Composition of first-order equivalences. -/
@[trans]
def comp (hnp : N ≃[L] P) (hmn : M ≃[L] N) : M ≃[L] P :=
{ hmn.toEquiv.trans hnp.toEquiv with
toFun := hnp ∘ hmn
-- Porting note: should be done by autoparam?
map_fun' := by intros; simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_fun]; trivial
-- Porting note: should be done by autoparam?
map_rel' := by intros; rw [Function.comp.assoc, map_rel, map_rel] }
#align first_order.language.equiv.comp FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (g : N ≃[L] P) (f : M ≃[L] N) (x : M) : g.comp f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.equiv.comp_apply FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_refl (g : M ≃[L] N) : g.comp (refl L M) = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_comp (g : M ≃[L] N) : (refl L N).comp g = g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_toEmbedding : (refl L M).toEmbedding = Embedding.refl L M :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem refl_toHom : (refl L M).toHom = Hom.id L M :=
rfl
/-- Composition of first-order homomorphisms is associative. -/
theorem comp_assoc (f : M ≃[L] N) (g : N ≃[L] P) (h : P ≃[L] Q) :
(h.comp g).comp f = h.comp (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.equiv.comp_assoc FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.comp_assoc
theorem injective_comp (h : N ≃[L] P) :
Function.Injective (h.comp : (M ≃[L] N) → (M ≃[L] P)) := by
intro f g hfg
ext x; exact h.injective (congr_fun (congr_arg DFunLike.coe hfg) x)
@[simp]
theorem comp_toHom (hnp : N ≃[L] P) (hmn : M ≃[L] N) :
(hnp.comp hmn).toHom = hnp.toHom.comp hmn.toHom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_toEmbedding (hnp : N ≃[L] P) (hmn : M ≃[L] N) :
(hnp.comp hmn).toEmbedding = hnp.toEmbedding.comp hmn.toEmbedding :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_comp_symm (f : M ≃[L] N) : f.comp f.symm = refl L N := by
ext; rw [comp_apply, apply_symm_apply, refl_apply]
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp_self (f : M ≃[L] N) : f.symm.comp f = refl L M := by
ext; rw [comp_apply, symm_apply_apply, refl_apply]
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp_self_toEmbedding (f : M ≃[L] N) :
f.symm.toEmbedding.comp f.toEmbedding = Embedding.refl L M := by
rw [← comp_toEmbedding, symm_comp_self, refl_toEmbedding]
@[simp]
theorem self_comp_symm_toEmbedding (f : M ≃[L] N) :
f.toEmbedding.comp f.symm.toEmbedding = Embedding.refl L N := by
rw [← comp_toEmbedding, self_comp_symm, refl_toEmbedding]
@[simp]
theorem symm_comp_self_toHom (f : M ≃[L] N) :
f.symm.toHom.comp f.toHom = Hom.id L M := by
rw [← comp_toHom, symm_comp_self, refl_toHom]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Basic.lean | 999 | 1,001 | theorem self_comp_symm_toHom (f : M ≃[L] N) :
f.toHom.comp f.symm.toHom = Hom.id L N := by |
rw [← comp_toHom, self_comp_symm, refl_toHom]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import order.height from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf27744463e9620ca4e4ebe951fe83530ae6949b"
/-!
# Maximal length of chains
This file contains lemmas to work with the maximal length of strictly descending finite
sequences (chains) in a partial order.
## Main definition
- `Set.subchain`: The set of strictly ascending lists of `α` contained in a `Set α`.
- `Set.chainHeight`: The maximal length of a strictly ascending sequence in a partial order.
This is defined as the maximum of the lengths of `Set.subchain`s, valued in `ℕ∞`.
## Main results
- `Set.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight`: For each `n : ℕ` such that `n ≤ s.chainHeight`, there
exists `s.subchain` of length `n`.
- `Set.chainHeight_mono`: If `s ⊆ t` then `s.chainHeight ≤ t.chainHeight`.
- `Set.chainHeight_image`: If `f` is an order embedding, then
`(f '' s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight`.
- `Set.chainHeight_insert_of_forall_lt`: If `∀ y ∈ s, y < x`, then
`(insert x s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + 1`.
- `Set.chainHeight_insert_of_forall_gt`: If `∀ y ∈ s, x < y`, then
`(insert x s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + 1`.
- `Set.chainHeight_union_eq`: If `∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, s ≤ t`, then
`(s ∪ t).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + t.chainHeight`.
- `Set.wellFoundedGT_of_chainHeight_ne_top`:
If `s` has finite height, then `>` is well-founded on `s`.
- `Set.wellFoundedLT_of_chainHeight_ne_top`:
If `s` has finite height, then `<` is well-founded on `s`.
-/
open List hiding le_antisymm
open OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section LT
variable [LT α] [LT β] (s t : Set α)
/-- The set of strictly ascending lists of `α` contained in a `Set α`. -/
def subchain : Set (List α) :=
{ l | l.Chain' (· < ·) ∧ ∀ i ∈ l, i ∈ s }
#align set.subchain Set.subchain
@[simp] -- porting note: new `simp`
theorem nil_mem_subchain : [] ∈ s.subchain := ⟨trivial, fun _ ↦ nofun⟩
#align set.nil_mem_subchain Set.nil_mem_subchain
variable {s} {l : List α} {a : α}
theorem cons_mem_subchain_iff :
(a::l) ∈ s.subchain ↔ a ∈ s ∧ l ∈ s.subchain ∧ ∀ b ∈ l.head?, a < b := by
simp only [subchain, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_cons, chain'_cons', and_left_comm, and_comm,
and_assoc]
#align set.cons_mem_subchain_iff Set.cons_mem_subchain_iff
@[simp] -- Porting note (#10756): new lemma + `simp`
theorem singleton_mem_subchain_iff : [a] ∈ s.subchain ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [cons_mem_subchain_iff]
instance : Nonempty s.subchain :=
⟨⟨[], s.nil_mem_subchain⟩⟩
variable (s)
/-- The maximal length of a strictly ascending sequence in a partial order. -/
noncomputable def chainHeight : ℕ∞ :=
⨆ l ∈ s.subchain, length l
#align set.chain_height Set.chainHeight
theorem chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype : s.chainHeight = ⨆ l : s.subchain, ↑l.1.length :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.chain_height_eq_supr_subtype Set.chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype
theorem exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight {n : ℕ} (hn : ↑n ≤ s.chainHeight) :
∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n := by
rcases (le_top : s.chainHeight ≤ ⊤).eq_or_lt with ha | ha <;>
rw [chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype] at ha
· obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩, rfl⟩, h₃⟩ :=
not_bddAbove_iff'.mp (WithTop.iSup_coe_eq_top.1 ha) n
exact ⟨l.take n, ⟨h₁.take _, fun x h ↦ h₂ _ <| take_subset _ _ h⟩,
(l.length_take n).trans <| min_eq_left <| le_of_not_ge h₃⟩
· rw [ENat.iSup_coe_lt_top] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩, e : l.length = _⟩ := Nat.sSup_mem (Set.range_nonempty _) ha
refine
⟨l.take n, ⟨h₁.take _, fun x h ↦ h₂ _ <| take_subset _ _ h⟩,
(l.length_take n).trans <| min_eq_left <| ?_⟩
rwa [e, ← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), sSup_range, ENat.coe_iSup ha, ← chainHeight_eq_iSup_subtype]
#align set.exists_chain_of_le_chain_height Set.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight
theorem le_chainHeight_TFAE (n : ℕ) :
TFAE [↑n ≤ s.chainHeight, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, n ≤ length l] := by
tfae_have 1 → 2; · exact s.exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight
tfae_have 2 → 3; · rintro ⟨l, hls, he⟩; exact ⟨l, hls, he.ge⟩
tfae_have 3 → 1; · rintro ⟨l, hs, hn⟩; exact le_iSup₂_of_le l hs (WithTop.coe_le_coe.2 hn)
tfae_finish
#align set.le_chain_height_tfae Set.le_chainHeight_TFAE
variable {s t}
theorem le_chainHeight_iff {n : ℕ} : ↑n ≤ s.chainHeight ↔ ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n :=
(le_chainHeight_TFAE s n).out 0 1
#align set.le_chain_height_iff Set.le_chainHeight_iff
theorem length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain (hl : l ∈ s.subchain) : ↑l.length ≤ s.chainHeight :=
le_chainHeight_iff.mpr ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
#align set.length_le_chain_height_of_mem_subchain Set.length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain
theorem chainHeight_eq_top_iff : s.chainHeight = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n, ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, length l = n := by
refine ⟨fun h n ↦ le_chainHeight_iff.1 (le_top.trans_eq h.symm), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
contrapose! h; obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := WithTop.ne_top_iff_exists.1 h
exact ⟨n + 1, fun l hs ↦ (Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 <| Nat.cast_le.1 <|
(length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain hs).trans_eq hn.symm).ne⟩
#align set.chain_height_eq_top_iff Set.chainHeight_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_chainHeight_iff : 1 ≤ s.chainHeight ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, Set.le_chainHeight_iff]
simp only [length_eq_one, @and_comm (_ ∈ _), @eq_comm _ _ [_], exists_exists_eq_and,
singleton_mem_subchain_iff, Set.Nonempty]
#align set.one_le_chain_height_iff Set.one_le_chainHeight_iff
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_eq_zero_iff : s.chainHeight = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, one_le_chainHeight_iff,
nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.chain_height_eq_zero_iff Set.chainHeight_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_empty : (∅ : Set α).chainHeight = 0 :=
chainHeight_eq_zero_iff.2 rfl
#align set.chain_height_empty Set.chainHeight_empty
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] : s.chainHeight = 0 :=
chainHeight_eq_zero_iff.mpr (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
#align set.chain_height_of_is_empty Set.chainHeight_of_isEmpty
theorem le_chainHeight_add_nat_iff {n m : ℕ} :
↑n ≤ s.chainHeight + m ↔ ∃ l ∈ s.subchain, n ≤ length l + m := by
simp_rw [← tsub_le_iff_right, ← ENat.coe_sub, (le_chainHeight_TFAE s (n - m)).out 0 2]
#align set.le_chain_height_add_nat_iff Set.le_chainHeight_add_nat_iff
theorem chainHeight_add_le_chainHeight_add (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (n m : ℕ) :
s.chainHeight + n ≤ t.chainHeight + m ↔
∀ l ∈ s.subchain, ∃ l' ∈ t.subchain, length l + n ≤ length l' + m := by
refine
⟨fun e l h ↦
le_chainHeight_add_nat_iff.1
((add_le_add_right (length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain h) _).trans e),
fun H ↦ ?_⟩
by_cases h : s.chainHeight = ⊤
· suffices t.chainHeight = ⊤ by
rw [this, top_add]
exact le_top
rw [chainHeight_eq_top_iff] at h ⊢
intro k
have := (le_chainHeight_TFAE t k).out 1 2
rw [this]
obtain ⟨l, hs, hl⟩ := h (k + m)
obtain ⟨l', ht, hl'⟩ := H l hs
exact ⟨l', ht, (add_le_add_iff_right m).1 <| _root_.trans (hl.symm.trans_le le_self_add) hl'⟩
· obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := WithTop.ne_top_iff_exists.1 h
obtain ⟨l, hs, hl⟩ := le_chainHeight_iff.1 hk.le
rw [← hk, ← hl]
exact le_chainHeight_add_nat_iff.2 (H l hs)
#align set.chain_height_add_le_chain_height_add Set.chainHeight_add_le_chainHeight_add
theorem chainHeight_le_chainHeight_TFAE (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
TFAE [s.chainHeight ≤ t.chainHeight, ∀ l ∈ s.subchain, ∃ l' ∈ t.subchain, length l = length l',
∀ l ∈ s.subchain, ∃ l' ∈ t.subchain, length l ≤ length l'] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3
· convert ← chainHeight_add_le_chainHeight_add s t 0 0 <;> apply add_zero
tfae_have 2 ↔ 3
· refine forall₂_congr fun l hl ↦ ?_
simp_rw [← (le_chainHeight_TFAE t l.length).out 1 2, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
#align set.chain_height_le_chain_height_tfae Set.chainHeight_le_chainHeight_TFAE
theorem chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff {t : Set β} :
s.chainHeight ≤ t.chainHeight ↔ ∀ l ∈ s.subchain, ∃ l' ∈ t.subchain, length l = length l' :=
(chainHeight_le_chainHeight_TFAE s t).out 0 1
#align set.chain_height_le_chain_height_iff Set.chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff
theorem chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff_le {t : Set β} :
s.chainHeight ≤ t.chainHeight ↔ ∀ l ∈ s.subchain, ∃ l' ∈ t.subchain, length l ≤ length l' :=
(chainHeight_le_chainHeight_TFAE s t).out 0 2
#align set.chain_height_le_chain_height_iff_le Set.chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff_le
theorem chainHeight_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : s.chainHeight ≤ t.chainHeight :=
chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff.2 fun l hl ↦ ⟨l, ⟨hl.1, fun i hi ↦ h <| hl.2 i hi⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.chain_height_mono Set.chainHeight_mono
theorem chainHeight_image (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ {x y}, x < y ↔ f x < f y) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight := by
apply le_antisymm <;> rw [chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff]
· suffices ∀ l ∈ (f '' s).subchain, ∃ l' ∈ s.subchain, map f l' = l by
intro l hl
obtain ⟨l', h₁, rfl⟩ := this l hl
exact ⟨l', h₁, length_map _ _⟩
intro l
induction' l with x xs hx
· exact fun _ ↦ ⟨nil, ⟨trivial, fun x h ↦ (not_mem_nil x h).elim⟩, rfl⟩
· intro h
rw [cons_mem_subchain_iff] at h
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx', rfl⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ := h
obtain ⟨l', h₃, rfl⟩ := hx h₁
refine ⟨x::l', Set.cons_mem_subchain_iff.mpr ⟨hx', h₃, ?_⟩, rfl⟩
cases l'
· simp
· simpa [← hf] using h₂
· intro l hl
refine ⟨l.map f, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [chain'_map, ← hf]
exact hl.1
· intro _ e
obtain ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩ := mem_map.mp e
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (hl.2 _ ha)
· rw [length_map]
#align set.chain_height_image Set.chainHeight_image
variable (s)
@[simp]
theorem chainHeight_dual : (ofDual ⁻¹' s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight := by
apply le_antisymm <;>
· rw [chainHeight_le_chainHeight_iff]
rintro l ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ⟨l.reverse, ⟨chain'_reverse.mpr h₁, fun i h ↦ h₂ i (mem_reverse.mp h)⟩,
(length_reverse _).symm⟩
#align set.chain_height_dual Set.chainHeight_dual
end LT
section Preorder
variable (s t : Set α) [Preorder α]
theorem chainHeight_eq_iSup_Ici : s.chainHeight = ⨆ i ∈ s, (s ∩ Set.Ici i).chainHeight := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine iSup₂_le ?_
rintro (_ | ⟨x, xs⟩) h
· exact zero_le _
· apply le_trans _ (le_iSup₂ x (cons_mem_subchain_iff.mp h).1)
apply length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain
refine ⟨h.1, fun i hi ↦ ⟨h.2 i hi, ?_⟩⟩
cases hi
· exact left_mem_Ici
rename_i hi
cases' chain'_iff_pairwise.mp h.1 with _ _ h'
exact (h' _ hi).le
· exact iSup₂_le fun i _ ↦ chainHeight_mono Set.inter_subset_left
#align set.chain_height_eq_supr_Ici Set.chainHeight_eq_iSup_Ici
theorem chainHeight_eq_iSup_Iic : s.chainHeight = ⨆ i ∈ s, (s ∩ Set.Iic i).chainHeight := by
simp_rw [← chainHeight_dual (_ ∩ _)]
rw [← chainHeight_dual, chainHeight_eq_iSup_Ici]
rfl
#align set.chain_height_eq_supr_Iic Set.chainHeight_eq_iSup_Iic
variable {s t}
theorem chainHeight_insert_of_forall_gt (a : α) (hx : ∀ b ∈ s, a < b) :
(insert a s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + 1 := by
rw [← add_zero (insert a s).chainHeight]
change (insert a s).chainHeight + (0 : ℕ) = s.chainHeight + (1 : ℕ)
apply le_antisymm <;> rw [chainHeight_add_le_chainHeight_add]
· rintro (_ | ⟨y, ys⟩) h
· exact ⟨[], nil_mem_subchain _, zero_le _⟩
· have h' := cons_mem_subchain_iff.mp h
refine ⟨ys, ⟨h'.2.1.1, fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩, by simp⟩
apply (h'.2.1.2 i hi).resolve_left
rintro rfl
cases' chain'_iff_pairwise.mp h.1 with _ _ hy
cases' h'.1 with h' h'
exacts [(hy _ hi).ne h', not_le_of_gt (hy _ hi) (hx _ h').le]
· intro l hl
refine ⟨a::l, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, by simp⟩
· rw [chain'_cons']
exact ⟨fun y hy ↦ hx _ (hl.2 _ (mem_of_mem_head? hy)), hl.1⟩
· -- Porting note: originally this was
-- rintro x (rfl | hx)
-- exacts [Or.inl (Set.mem_singleton x), Or.inr (hl.2 x hx)]
-- but this fails because `List.Mem` is now an inductive prop.
-- I couldn't work out how to drive `rcases` here but asked at
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/348111-std4/topic/rcases.3F/near/347976083
rintro x (_ | _)
exacts [Or.inl (Set.mem_singleton a), Or.inr (hl.2 x ‹_›)]
#align set.chain_height_insert_of_forall_gt Set.chainHeight_insert_of_forall_gt
theorem chainHeight_insert_of_forall_lt (a : α) (ha : ∀ b ∈ s, b < a) :
(insert a s).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + 1 := by
rw [← chainHeight_dual, ← chainHeight_dual s]
exact chainHeight_insert_of_forall_gt _ ha
#align set.chain_height_insert_of_forall_lt Set.chainHeight_insert_of_forall_lt
theorem chainHeight_union_le : (s ∪ t).chainHeight ≤ s.chainHeight + t.chainHeight := by
classical
refine iSup₂_le fun l hl ↦ ?_
let l₁ := l.filter (· ∈ s)
let l₂ := l.filter (· ∈ t)
have hl₁ : ↑l₁.length ≤ s.chainHeight := by
apply Set.length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain
exact ⟨hl.1.sublist (filter_sublist _), fun i h ↦ by simpa using (of_mem_filter h : _)⟩
have hl₂ : ↑l₂.length ≤ t.chainHeight := by
apply Set.length_le_chainHeight_of_mem_subchain
exact ⟨hl.1.sublist (filter_sublist _), fun i h ↦ by simpa using (of_mem_filter h : _)⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add hl₁ hl₂)
simp_rw [l₁, l₂, ← Nat.cast_add, ← Multiset.coe_card, ← Multiset.card_add,
← Multiset.filter_coe]
rw [Multiset.filter_add_filter, Multiset.filter_eq_self.mpr, Multiset.card_add, Nat.cast_add]
exacts [le_add_right rfl.le, hl.2]
#align set.chain_height_union_le Set.chainHeight_union_le
| Mathlib/Order/Height.lean | 333 | 349 | theorem chainHeight_union_eq (s t : Set α) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a < b) :
(s ∪ t).chainHeight = s.chainHeight + t.chainHeight := by |
cases h : t.chainHeight
· rw [add_top, eq_top_iff, ← h]
exact Set.chainHeight_mono subset_union_right
apply le_antisymm
· rw [← h]
exact chainHeight_union_le
rw [← add_zero (s ∪ t).chainHeight, ← WithTop.coe_zero,
ENat.some_eq_coe, chainHeight_add_le_chainHeight_add]
intro l hl
obtain ⟨l', hl', rfl⟩ := exists_chain_of_le_chainHeight t h.symm.le
refine ⟨l ++ l', ⟨Chain'.append hl.1 hl'.1 fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_, fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩, by simp⟩
· exact H x (hl.2 _ <| mem_of_mem_getLast? hx) y (hl'.2 _ <| mem_of_mem_head? hy)
· rw [mem_append] at hi
cases' hi with hi hi
exacts [Or.inl (hl.2 _ hi), Or.inr (hl'.2 _ hi)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
/-! ### tail -/
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
/-! ### next? -/
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
/-! ### get? -/
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
/-! ### drop -/
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
/-! ### modifyNth -/
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
/-! ### set -/
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
/-! ### removeNth -/
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
/-! ### tail -/
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
/-! ### eraseP -/
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [BEq α]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP' (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a = l.eraseP (· == a) := by
induction l
· simp
· next b t ih =>
rw [erase_cons, eraseP_cons, ih]
if h : b == a then simp [h] else simp [h]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) : ∀ l : List α, l.erase a = l.eraseP (a == ·)
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by
if h : a = b then simp [h] else simp [h, Ne.symm h, erase_eq_eraseP a l]
theorem exists_erase_eq [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, e, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_eraseP h (beq_self_eq_true _)
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, fun h => h₁ _ h (beq_self_eq_true _), eq_of_beq e ▸ h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact length_eraseP_of_mem h (beq_self_eq_true a)
theorem erase_append_left [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ : List α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ := by
simp [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact eraseP_append_left (beq_self_eq_true a) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l₁ : List α} (l₂ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = (l₁ ++ l₂.erase a) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_append_right]
intros b h' h''; rw [eq_of_beq h''] at h; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP' a l ▸ eraseP_sublist l
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a ⊆ l := (erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem Sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq_eraseP']; exact h.eraseP
@[deprecated] alias sublist.erase := Sublist.erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈ l := erase_subset _ _ h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} {l : List α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP b l ▸ mem_eraseP_of_neg (mt eq_of_beq ab.symm)
theorem erase_comm [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) :
(l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a := by
if ab : a == b then rw [eq_of_beq ab] else ?_
if ha : a ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
if hb : b ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha with
| _, _, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩ =>
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end erase
/-! ### filter and partition -/
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
/-! ### findIdx -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
/-! ### findIdx? -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_some {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = some i) :
match xs.get? i with | some a => p a | none => false := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
split at w <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_none {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = none) :
∀ i, match xs.get? i with | some a => ¬ p a | none => true := by
intro i
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [Bool.not_eq_true, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
cases i with
| zero =>
split at w <;> simp_all
| succ i =>
simp only [get?_cons_succ]
apply ih
split at w <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_append :
(xs ++ ys : List α).findIdx? p =
(xs.findIdx? p <|> (ys.findIdx? p).map fun i => i + xs.length) := by
induction xs with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all [Option.map_orElse, Option.map_map]; rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_replicate :
(replicate n a).findIdx? p = if 0 < n ∧ p a then some 0 else none := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, Nat.zero_lt_succ, true_and]
split <;> simp_all
/-! ### pairwise -/
theorem Pairwise.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₂.Pairwise R → l₁.Pairwise R
| .slnil, h => h
| .cons _ s, .cons _ h₂ => h₂.sublist s
| .cons₂ _ s, .cons h₁ h₂ => (h₂.sublist s).cons fun _ h => h₁ _ (s.subset h)
theorem pairwise_map {l : List α} :
(l.map f).Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise fun a b => R (f a) (f b) := by
induction l
· simp
· simp only [map, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_map_iff, *]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).Pairwise R ↔ l₁.Pairwise R ∧ l₂.Pairwise R ∧ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, R a b := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_imp, forall_and, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem pairwise_reverse {l : List α} :
l.reverse.Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise (fun a b => R b a) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, pairwise_append, and_comm]
theorem Pairwise.imp {α R S} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) :
∀ {l : List α}, l.Pairwise R → l.Pairwise S
| _, .nil => .nil
| _, .cons h₁ h₂ => .cons (H ∘ h₁ ·) (h₂.imp H)
/-! ### replaceF -/
theorem replaceF_nil : [].replaceF p = [] := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = match p a with
| none => a :: replaceF p l
| some a' => a' :: l := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons_of_some {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = some a') :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a' :: l := by
simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_cons_of_none {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = none) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a :: l.replaceF p := by simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_of_forall_none {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a = none) : l.replaceF p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_replaceF : ∀ {l : List α} {a a'} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a = some a'),
∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂
| b :: l, a, a', al, pa =>
match pb : p b with
| some b' => ⟨b, b', [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
| none =>
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb.symm.trans pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, c', l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_replaceF al pa
⟨c, c', b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_replaceF (p) (l : List α) :
l.replaceF p = l ∨ ∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, (p a).isSome then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_replaceF ha (Option.get_mem pa))
else
.inl <| replaceF_of_forall_none fun a ha =>
Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.1 fun h' => h ⟨a, ha, h'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_replaceF : length (replaceF f l) = length l := by
induction l <;> simp [replaceF]; split <;> simp [*]
/-! ### disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₂ l₁ := ⟨disjoint_symm, disjoint_symm⟩
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 819 | 819 | theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := by | simp [Disjoint]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.MeanInequalities
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_seminorm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# Triangle inequality for `Lp`-seminorm
In this file we prove several versions of the triangle inequality for the `Lp` seminorm,
as well as simple corollaries.
-/
open Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → E}
theorem snorm'_add_le {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hq1 : 1 ≤ q) : snorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ snorm' f q μ + snorm' g q μ :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, (‖(f + g) a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) ≤
(∫⁻ a, ((fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) + fun a => (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
gcongr with a
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_add_le]
_ ≤ snorm' f q μ + snorm' g q μ := ENNReal.lintegral_Lp_add_le hf.ennnorm hg.ennnorm hq1
#align measure_theory.snorm'_add_le MeasureTheory.snorm'_add_le
theorem snorm'_add_le_of_le_one {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hq0 : 0 ≤ q)
(hq1 : q ≤ 1) : snorm' (f + g) q μ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / q - 1) * (snorm' f q μ + snorm' g q μ) :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, (‖(f + g) a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) ≤
(∫⁻ a, ((fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) + fun a => (‖g a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
gcongr with a
simp only [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_add_le]
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / q - 1) * (snorm' f q μ + snorm' g q μ) :=
ENNReal.lintegral_Lp_add_le_of_le_one hf.ennnorm hq0 hq1
#align measure_theory.snorm'_add_le_of_le_one MeasureTheory.snorm'_add_le_of_le_one
theorem snormEssSup_add_le {f g : α → E} :
snormEssSup (f + g) μ ≤ snormEssSup f μ + snormEssSup g μ := by
refine le_trans (essSup_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)) (ENNReal.essSup_add_le _ _)
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, ← ENNReal.coe_add, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact nnnorm_add_le _ _
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_add_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_add_le
theorem snorm_add_le {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hp1 : 1 ≤ p) : snorm (f + g) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ + snorm g p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, snormEssSup_add_le]
have hp1_real : 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
rwa [← ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ENNReal.one_ne_top hp_top]
repeat rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top]
exact snorm'_add_le hf hg hp1_real
#align measure_theory.snorm_add_le MeasureTheory.snorm_add_le
/-- A constant for the inequality `‖f + g‖_{L^p} ≤ C * (‖f‖_{L^p} + ‖g‖_{L^p})`. It is equal to `1`
for `p ≥ 1` or `p = 0`, and `2^(1/p-1)` in the more tricky interval `(0, 1)`. -/
noncomputable def LpAddConst (p : ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ≥0∞) 1 then (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p.toReal - 1) else 1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.Lp_add_const MeasureTheory.LpAddConst
theorem LpAddConst_of_one_le {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LpAddConst p = 1 := by
rw [LpAddConst, if_neg]
intro h
exact lt_irrefl _ (h.2.trans_le hp)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.Lp_add_const_of_one_le MeasureTheory.LpAddConst_of_one_le
theorem LpAddConst_zero : LpAddConst 0 = 1 := by
rw [LpAddConst, if_neg]
intro h
exact lt_irrefl _ h.1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.Lp_add_const_zero MeasureTheory.LpAddConst_zero
theorem LpAddConst_lt_top (p : ℝ≥0∞) : LpAddConst p < ∞ := by
rw [LpAddConst]
split_ifs with h
· apply ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg _ ENNReal.two_ne_top
simp only [one_div, sub_nonneg]
apply one_le_inv (ENNReal.toReal_pos h.1.ne' (h.2.trans ENNReal.one_lt_top).ne)
simpa using ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.one_ne_top h.2.le
· exact ENNReal.one_lt_top
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.Lp_add_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.LpAddConst_lt_top
theorem snorm_add_le' {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(p : ℝ≥0∞) : snorm (f + g) p μ ≤ LpAddConst p * (snorm f p μ + snorm g p μ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_zero, add_zero, mul_zero, le_zero_iff]
rcases lt_or_le p 1 with (h'p | h'p)
· simp only [snorm_eq_snorm' hp (h'p.trans ENNReal.one_lt_top).ne]
convert snorm'_add_le_of_le_one hf ENNReal.toReal_nonneg _
· have : p ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : ℝ≥0∞) 1 := ⟨hp.bot_lt, h'p⟩
simp only [LpAddConst, if_pos this]
· simpa using ENNReal.toReal_mono ENNReal.one_ne_top h'p.le
· simp [LpAddConst_of_one_le h'p]
exact snorm_add_le hf hg h'p
#align measure_theory.snorm_add_le' MeasureTheory.snorm_add_le'
variable (μ E)
/-- Technical lemma to control the addition of functions in `L^p` even for `p < 1`: Given `δ > 0`,
there exists `η` such that two functions bounded by `η` in `L^p` have a sum bounded by `δ`. One
could take `η = δ / 2` for `p ≥ 1`, but the point of the lemma is that it works also for `p < 1`.
-/
theorem exists_Lp_half (p : ℝ≥0∞) {δ : ℝ≥0∞} (hδ : δ ≠ 0) :
∃ η : ℝ≥0∞,
0 < η ∧
∀ (f g : α → E), AEStronglyMeasurable f μ → AEStronglyMeasurable g μ →
snorm f p μ ≤ η → snorm g p μ ≤ η → snorm (f + g) p μ < δ := by
have :
Tendsto (fun η : ℝ≥0∞ => LpAddConst p * (η + η)) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (LpAddConst p * (0 + 0))) :=
(ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_id.add tendsto_id)
(Or.inr (LpAddConst_lt_top p).ne)).mono_left
nhdsWithin_le_nhds
simp only [add_zero, mul_zero] at this
rcases (((tendsto_order.1 this).2 δ hδ.bot_lt).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨η, hη, ηpos⟩
refine ⟨η, ηpos, fun f g hf hg Hf Hg => ?_⟩
calc
snorm (f + g) p μ ≤ LpAddConst p * (snorm f p μ + snorm g p μ) := snorm_add_le' hf hg p
_ ≤ LpAddConst p * (η + η) := by gcongr
_ < δ := hη
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.exists_Lp_half MeasureTheory.exists_Lp_half
variable {μ E}
theorem snorm_sub_le' {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(p : ℝ≥0∞) : snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ LpAddConst p * (snorm f p μ + snorm g p μ) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, snorm_neg] using snorm_add_le' hf hg.neg p
#align measure_theory.snorm_sub_le' MeasureTheory.snorm_sub_le'
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/TriangleInequality.lean | 145 | 147 | theorem snorm_sub_le {f g : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hp : 1 ≤ p) : snorm (f - g) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ + snorm g p μ := by |
simpa [LpAddConst_of_one_le hp] using snorm_sub_le' hf hg p
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Biproducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import category_theory.preadditive.biproducts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a176cb1219e300e85793d44583dede42377b51af"
/-!
# Basic facts about biproducts in preadditive categories.
In (or between) preadditive categories,
* Any biproduct satisfies the equality
`total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`,
or, in the binary case, `total : fst ≫ inl + snd ≫ inr = 𝟙 X`.
* Any (binary) `product` or (binary) `coproduct` is a (binary) `biproduct`.
* In any category (with zero morphisms), if `biprod.map f g` is an isomorphism,
then both `f` and `g` are isomorphisms.
* If `f` is a morphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ⟶ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
then we can construct isomorphisms `L : X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ X₁ ⊞ X₂` and `R : Y₁ ⊞ Y₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂`
so that `L.hom ≫ g ≫ R.hom` is diagonal (with `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` component still `f`),
via Gaussian elimination.
* As a corollary of the previous two facts,
if we have an isomorphism `X₁ ⊞ X₂ ≅ Y₁ ⊞ Y₂` whose `X₁ ⟶ Y₁` entry is an isomorphism,
we can construct an isomorphism `X₂ ≅ Y₂`.
* If `f : W ⊞ X ⟶ Y ⊞ Z` is an isomorphism, either `𝟙 W = 0`,
or at least one of the component maps `W ⟶ Y` and `W ⟶ Z` is nonzero.
* If `f : ⨁ S ⟶ ⨁ T` is an isomorphism,
then every column (corresponding to a nonzero summand in the domain)
has some nonzero matrix entry.
* A functor preserves a biproduct if and only if it preserves
the corresponding product if and only if it preserves the corresponding coproduct.
There are connections between this material and the special case of the category whose morphisms are
matrices over a ring, in particular the Schur complement (see
`Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SchurComplement`). In particular, the declarations
`CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`, `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian`
and `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` are all closely related.
-/
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open CategoryTheory.Preadditive
open scoped Classical
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [Preadditive C]
namespace Limits
section Fintype
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J]
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBilimitOfTotal {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f) (total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) :
b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s => ∑ j : J, s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ b.ι j
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
have reassoced : m ≫ Bicone.π b j ≫ Bicone.ι b j = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ Bicone.ι b j := by
erw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
rw [reassoced]
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
simp only [sum_comp, Category.assoc, Bicone.toCone_π_app, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
dsimp;
simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s => ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ s.ι.app ⟨j⟩
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, sum_comp]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro j _
erw [Category.assoc, h ⟨j⟩]
fac := fun s j => by
cases j
simp only [comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, b.ι_π, dite_comp]
dsimp; simp }
#align category_theory.limits.is_bilimit_of_total CategoryTheory.Limits.isBilimitOfTotal
theorem IsBilimit.total {f : J → C} {b : Bicone f} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by
cases j
simp [sum_comp, b.ι_π, comp_dite]
#align category_theory.limits.is_bilimit.total CategoryTheory.Limits.IsBilimit.total
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a biproduct for `f : J → C` from
any bicone `b` for `f` satisfying `total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBiproduct_of_total {f : J → C} (b : Bicone f)
(total : ∑ j : J, b.π j ≫ b.ι j = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBiproduct f :=
HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBilimitOfTotal b total }
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct_of_total CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBiproduct_of_total
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsLimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
cases j
simp [sum_comp, t.ι_π, dite_comp, comp_dite]
#align category_theory.limits.is_bilimit_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.isBilimitOfIsLimit
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsLimit t) : (Bicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsLimit _ <|
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit ht <|
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _)
(by
rintro ⟨j⟩
aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_is_bilimit_of_limit_cone_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit
/-- In a preadditive category, any finite bicone which is a colimit cocone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBilimitOfIsColimit {f : J → C} (t : Bicone f) (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) : t.IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfTotal _ <|
ht.hom_ext fun j => by
cases j
simp_rw [Bicone.toCocone_ι_app, comp_sum, ← Category.assoc, t.ι_π, dite_comp]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.is_bilimit_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.isBilimitOfIsColimit
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)}
(ht : IsColimit t) : (Bicone.ofColimitCocone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBilimitOfIsColimit _ <| IsColimit.ofIsoColimit ht <| Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro ⟨j⟩; simp
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_is_bilimit_of_colimit_cocone_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit
end Fintype
section Finite
variable {J : Type} [Finite J]
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct (f : J → C) [HasProduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct.of_has_product CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct
/-- In a preadditive category, if the coproduct over `f : J → C` exists,
then the biproduct over `f` exists. -/
theorem HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasCoproduct f] : HasBiproduct f := by
cases nonempty_fintype J
exact HasBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := biconeIsBilimitOfColimitCoconeOfIsColimit (colimit.isColimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct.of_has_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct
end Finite
/-- A preadditive category with finite products has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteProducts [HasFiniteProducts C] : HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasProduct _ }⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_biproducts.of_has_finite_products CategoryTheory.Limits.HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteProducts
/-- A preadditive category with finite coproducts has finite biproducts. -/
theorem HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteCoproducts [HasFiniteCoproducts C] :
HasFiniteBiproducts C :=
⟨fun _ => { has_biproduct := fun _ => HasBiproduct.of_hasCoproduct _ }⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_biproducts.of_has_finite_coproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.HasFiniteBiproducts.of_hasFiniteCoproducts
section HasBiproduct
variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f]
/-- In any preadditive category, any biproduct satsifies
`∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f)`
-/
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.total : ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ biproduct.ι f j = 𝟙 (⨁ f) :=
IsBilimit.total (biproduct.isBilimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.total CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.total
theorem biproduct.lift_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} :
biproduct.lift g = ∑ j, g j ≫ biproduct.ι f j := by
ext j
simp only [sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, biproduct.lift_π, Category.assoc, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, if_true]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift_eq
theorem biproduct.desc_eq {T : C} {g : ∀ j, f j ⟶ T} :
biproduct.desc g = ∑ j, biproduct.π f j ≫ g j := by
ext j
simp [comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.desc_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.desc_eq
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_desc {T U : C} {g : ∀ j, T ⟶ f j} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ U} :
biproduct.lift g ≫ biproduct.desc h = ∑ j : J, g j ≫ h j := by
simp [biproduct.lift_eq, biproduct.desc_eq, comp_sum, sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite,
dite_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift_desc
theorem biproduct.map_eq [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f g : J → C} {h : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j} :
biproduct.map h = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π f j ≫ h j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
ext
simp [biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_sum, sum_comp, comp_dite, dite_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map_eq
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.lift_matrix {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
{P} (x : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) :
biproduct.lift x ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => ∑ j, x j ≫ m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.lift_desc]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift_matrix CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift_matrix
end HasBiproduct
section HasFiniteBiproducts
variable {J K : Type} [Finite J] {f : J → C} [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_desc [Fintype K] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
(m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) {P} (x : ∀ k, g k ⟶ P) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.desc x = biproduct.desc fun j => ∑ k, m j k ≫ x k := by
ext
simp [lift_desc]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.matrix_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.matrix_desc
variable [Finite K]
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.matrix_map {f : J → C} {g : K → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ k, g k ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.map n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j k ≫ n k := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.matrix_map CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.matrix_map
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.map_matrix {f : J → C} {g : J → C} {h : K → C} (m : ∀ k, f k ⟶ g k)
(n : ∀ j k, g j ⟶ h k) :
biproduct.map m ≫ biproduct.matrix n = biproduct.matrix fun j k => m j ≫ n j k := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map_matrix CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map_matrix
end HasFiniteBiproducts
/-- Reindex a categorical biproduct via an equivalence of the index types. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.reindex {β γ : Type} [Finite β] (ε : β ≃ γ)
(f : γ → C) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (f ∘ ε)] : ⨁ f ∘ ε ≅ ⨁ f where
hom := biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.ι f (ε b)
inv := biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.π f (ε b)
hom_inv_id := by
ext b b'
by_cases h : b' = b
· subst h; simp
· have : ε b' ≠ ε b := by simp [h]
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h, biproduct.ι_π_ne _ this]
inv_hom_id := by
cases nonempty_fintype β
ext g g'
by_cases h : g' = g <;>
simp [Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.lift_desc,
biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, comp_dite, Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply,
Finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.univ (ε.symm g') _, h]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.reindex CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.reindex
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
def isBinaryBilimitOfTotal {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : b.IsBilimit where
isLimit :=
{ lift := fun s =>
(BinaryFan.fst s ≫ b.inl : s.pt ⟶ b.pt) + (BinaryFan.snd s ≫ b.inr : s.pt ⟶ b.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
have reassoced (j : WalkingPair) {W : C} (h' : _ ⟶ W) :
m ≫ b.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' = s.π.app ⟨j⟩ ≫ h' := by
rw [← Category.assoc, eq_whisker (h ⟨j⟩)]
erw [← Category.comp_id m, ← total, comp_add, reassoced WalkingPair.left,
reassoced WalkingPair.right]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
isColimit :=
{ desc := fun s =>
(b.fst ≫ BinaryCofan.inl s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt) + (b.snd ≫ BinaryCofan.inr s : b.pt ⟶ s.pt)
uniq := fun s m h => by
erw [← Category.id_comp m, ← total, add_comp, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩, h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩]
fac := fun s j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp }
#align category_theory.limits.is_binary_bilimit_of_total CategoryTheory.Limits.isBinaryBilimitOfTotal
theorem IsBilimit.binary_total {X Y : C} {b : BinaryBicone X Y} (i : b.IsBilimit) :
b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt :=
i.isLimit.hom_ext fun j => by rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.is_bilimit.binary_total CategoryTheory.Limits.IsBilimit.binary_total
/-- In a preadditive category, we can construct a binary biproduct for `X Y : C` from
any binary bicone `b` satisfying `total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.X`.
(That is, such a bicone is a limit cone and a colimit cocone.)
-/
theorem hasBinaryBiproduct_of_total {X Y : C} (b : BinaryBicone X Y)
(total : b.fst ≫ b.inl + b.snd ≫ b.inr = 𝟙 b.pt) : HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := b
isBilimit := isBinaryBilimitOfTotal b total }
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_biproduct_of_total CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBinaryBiproduct_of_total
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
snd := t.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
inl := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
inr := ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
#align category_theory.limits.binary_bicone.of_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone
theorem inl_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inl = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk (𝟙 X) 0); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.inl_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_of_isLimit
theorem inr_of_isLimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.inr = ht.lift (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryFan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)); rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.inr_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_of_isLimit
/-- In a preadditive category, any binary bicone which is a limit cone is in fact a bilimit
bicone. -/
def isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit {X Y : C} (t : BinaryBicone X Y) (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) :
t.IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ (by refine BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ ?_ <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.is_binary_bilimit_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.isBinaryBilimitOfIsLimit
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a pair into a bilimit bicone. -/
def binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit {X Y : C} {t : Cone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsLimit t) :
(BinaryBicone.ofLimitCone ht).IsBilimit :=
isBinaryBilimitOfTotal _ <| BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext ht (by simp) (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_bicone_is_bilimit_of_limit_cone_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit
/-- In a preadditive category, if the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then the
binary biproduct of `X` and `Y` exists. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
HasBinaryBiproduct X Y :=
HasBinaryBiproduct.mk
{ bicone := _
isBilimit := binaryBiconeIsBilimitOfLimitConeOfIsLimit (limit.isLimit _) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_biproduct.of_has_binary_product CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct
/-- In a preadditive category, if all binary products exist, then all binary biproducts exist. -/
theorem HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryProducts [HasBinaryProducts C] : HasBinaryBiproducts C :=
{ has_binary_biproduct := fun X Y => HasBinaryBiproduct.of_hasBinaryProduct X Y }
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_biproducts.of_has_binary_products CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryBiproducts.of_hasBinaryProducts
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a pair into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone {X Y : C} {t : Cocone (pair X Y)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
BinaryBicone X Y where
pt := t.pt
fst := ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
snd := ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
inl := t.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
inr := t.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_bicone.of_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryBicone.ofColimitCocone
theorem fst_of_isColimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.fst = ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0) := by
apply ht.uniq (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 X) 0)
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.fst_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.fst_of_isColimit
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Preadditive/Biproducts.lean | 421 | 424 | theorem snd_of_isColimit {X Y : C} {t : BinaryBicone X Y} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) :
t.snd = ht.desc (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y)) := by |
apply ht.uniq (BinaryCofan.mk 0 (𝟙 Y))
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> dsimp <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Bryan Gin-ge Chen
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Heyting.Basic
#align_import order.boolean_algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
/-!
# (Generalized) Boolean algebras
A Boolean algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with a complement operator. Boolean algebras
generalize the (classical) logic of propositions and the lattice of subsets of a set.
Generalized Boolean algebras may be less familiar, but they are essentially Boolean algebras which
do not necessarily have a top element (`⊤`) (and hence not all elements may have complements). One
example in mathlib is `Finset α`, the type of all finite subsets of an arbitrary
(not-necessarily-finite) type `α`.
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α` is defined to be a distributive lattice with bottom (`⊥`) admitting
a *relative* complement operator, written using "set difference" notation as `x \ y` (`sdiff x y`).
For convenience, the `BooleanAlgebra` type class is defined to extend `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`
so that it is also bundled with a `\` operator.
(A terminological point: `x \ y` is the complement of `y` relative to the interval `[⊥, x]`. We do
not yet have relative complements for arbitrary intervals, as we do not even have lattice
intervals.)
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra`: a type class for generalized Boolean algebras
* `BooleanAlgebra`: a type class for Boolean algebras.
* `Prop.booleanAlgebra`: the Boolean algebra instance on `Prop`
## Implementation notes
The `sup_inf_sdiff` and `inf_inf_sdiff` axioms for the relative complement operator in
`GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` are taken from
[Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations).
[Stone's paper introducing generalized Boolean algebras][Stone1935] does not define a relative
complement operator `a \ b` for all `a`, `b`. Instead, the postulates there amount to an assumption
that for all `a, b : α` where `a ≤ b`, the equations `x ⊔ a = b` and `x ⊓ a = ⊥` have a solution
`x`. `Disjoint.sdiff_unique` proves that this `x` is in fact `b \ a`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebra_(structure)#Generalizations>
* [*Postulates for Boolean Algebras and Generalized Boolean Algebras*, M.H. Stone][Stone1935]
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
## Tags
generalized Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras, lattices, sdiff, compl
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {w x y z : α}
/-!
### Generalized Boolean algebras
Some of the lemmas in this section are from:
* [*Lattice Theory: Foundation*, George Grätzer][Gratzer2011]
* <https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/relative+complement>
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
-/
/-- A generalized Boolean algebra is a distributive lattice with `⊥` and a relative complement
operation `\` (called `sdiff`, after "set difference") satisfying `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a \ b) = a` and
`(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a \ b) = ⊥`, i.e. `a \ b` is the complement of `b` in `a`.
This is a generalization of Boolean algebras which applies to `Finset α` for arbitrary
(not-necessarily-`Fintype`) `α`. -/
class GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (α : Type u) extends DistribLattice α, SDiff α, Bot α where
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊔ (a / b) = a` -/
sup_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊔ a \ b = a
/-- For any `a`, `b`, `(a ⊓ b) ⊓ (a / b) = ⊥` -/
inf_inf_sdiff : ∀ a b : α, a ⊓ b ⊓ a \ b = ⊥
#align generalized_boolean_algebra GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
-- We might want an `IsCompl_of` predicate (for relative complements) generalizing `IsCompl`,
-- however we'd need another type class for lattices with bot, and all the API for that.
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α]
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y = x :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.sup_inf_sdiff _ _
#align sup_inf_sdiff sup_inf_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inf_inf_sdiff (x y : α) : x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y = ⊥ :=
GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.inf_inf_sdiff _ _
#align inf_inf_sdiff inf_inf_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y = x := by rw [sup_comm, sup_inf_sdiff]
#align sup_sdiff_inf sup_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_inf (x y : α) : x \ y ⊓ (x ⊓ y) = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_inf_sdiff]
#align inf_sdiff_inf inf_sdiff_inf
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot : OrderBot α where
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toBot
bot_le a := by
rw [← inf_inf_sdiff a a, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align generalized_boolean_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
theorem disjoint_inf_sdiff : Disjoint (x ⊓ y) (x \ y) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (inf_inf_sdiff x y).le
#align disjoint_inf_sdiff disjoint_inf_sdiff
-- TODO: in distributive lattices, relative complements are unique when they exist
theorem sdiff_unique (s : x ⊓ y ⊔ z = x) (i : x ⊓ y ⊓ z = ⊥) : x \ y = z := by
conv_rhs at s => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff x y, sup_comm]
rw [sup_comm] at s
conv_rhs at i => rw [← inf_inf_sdiff x y, inf_comm]
rw [inf_comm] at i
exact (eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq i s).symm
#align sdiff_unique sdiff_unique
-- Use `sdiff_le`
private theorem sdiff_le' : x \ y ≤ x :=
calc
x \ y ≤ x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y := le_sup_right
_ = x := sup_inf_sdiff x y
-- Use `sdiff_sup_self`
private theorem sdiff_sup_self' : y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x :=
calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y \ x ⊔ (x ⊔ x ⊓ y) := by rw [sup_inf_self]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x ⊔ x := by ac_rfl
_ = y ⊔ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_sdiff : x \ y ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
Eq.symm <|
calc
⊥ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (x ⊓ (y ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = (y ⊓ (x ⊓ x) ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x) ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_idem]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ x \ y ⊔ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_sup_right, inf_comm x y]
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ x \ y := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
_ = x ⊓ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by ac_rfl
_ = x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_of_le_right sdiff_le']
#align sdiff_inf_sdiff sdiff_inf_sdiff
theorem disjoint_sdiff_sdiff : Disjoint (x \ y) (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr sdiff_inf_sdiff.le
#align disjoint_sdiff_sdiff disjoint_sdiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_right : x ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ :=
calc
x ⊓ y \ x = (x ⊓ y ⊔ x \ y) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = x ⊓ y ⊓ y \ x ⊔ x \ y ⊓ y \ x := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm x y, inf_inf_sdiff, sdiff_inf_sdiff, bot_sup_eq]
#align inf_sdiff_self_right inf_sdiff_self_right
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_self_left : y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := by rw [inf_comm, inf_sdiff_self_right]
#align inf_sdiff_self_left inf_sdiff_self_left
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α where
__ := ‹GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α›
__ := GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toOrderBot
sdiff := (· \ ·)
sdiff_le_iff y x z :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(le_of_eq
(calc
y ⊓ y \ x = y \ x := inf_of_le_right sdiff_le'
_ = x ⊓ y \ x ⊔ z ⊓ y \ x := by
rw [inf_eq_right.2 h, inf_sdiff_self_right, bot_sup_eq]
_ = (x ⊔ z) ⊓ y \ x := by rw [← inf_sup_right]))
(calc
y ⊔ y \ x = y := sup_of_le_left sdiff_le'
_ ≤ y ⊔ (x ⊔ z) := le_sup_left
_ = y \ x ⊔ x ⊔ z := by rw [← sup_assoc, ← @sdiff_sup_self' _ x y]
_ = x ⊔ z ⊔ y \ x := by ac_rfl),
fun h =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le
(calc
y \ x ⊓ x = ⊥ := inf_sdiff_self_left
_ ≤ z ⊓ x := bot_le)
(calc
y \ x ⊔ x = y ⊔ x := sdiff_sup_self'
_ ≤ x ⊔ z ⊔ x := sup_le_sup_right h x
_ ≤ z ⊔ x := by rw [sup_assoc, sup_comm, sup_assoc, sup_idem])⟩
#align generalized_boolean_algebra.to_generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra.toGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_left : Disjoint (y \ x) x :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_left.le
#align disjoint_sdiff_self_left disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem disjoint_sdiff_self_right : Disjoint x (y \ x) :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr inf_sdiff_self_right.le
#align disjoint_sdiff_self_right disjoint_sdiff_self_right
lemma le_sdiff : x ≤ y \ z ↔ x ≤ y ∧ Disjoint x z :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.trans sdiff_le, disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h⟩, fun h ↦
by rw [← h.2.sdiff_eq_left]; exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h.1⟩
#align le_sdiff le_sdiff
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_left : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y :=
⟨fun h ↦ disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_left h.ge, Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left⟩
#align sdiff_eq_left sdiff_eq_left
/- TODO: we could make an alternative constructor for `GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra` using
`Disjoint x (y \ x)` and `x ⊔ (y \ x) = y` as axioms. -/
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq (hi : Disjoint x z) (hs : x ⊔ z = y) : y \ x = z :=
have h : y ⊓ x = x := inf_eq_right.2 <| le_sup_left.trans hs.le
sdiff_unique (by rw [h, hs]) (by rw [h, hi.eq_bot])
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq Disjoint.sdiff_eq_of_sup_eq
protected theorem Disjoint.sdiff_unique (hd : Disjoint x z) (hz : z ≤ y) (hs : y ≤ x ⊔ z) :
y \ x = z :=
sdiff_unique
(by
rw [← inf_eq_right] at hs
rwa [sup_inf_right, inf_sup_right, sup_comm x, inf_sup_self, inf_comm, sup_comm z,
hs, sup_eq_left])
(by rw [inf_assoc, hd.eq_bot, inf_bot_eq])
#align disjoint.sdiff_unique Disjoint.sdiff_unique
-- cf. `IsCompl.disjoint_left_iff` and `IsCompl.disjoint_right_iff`
theorem disjoint_sdiff_iff_le (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : Disjoint z (y \ x) ↔ z ≤ x :=
⟨fun H =>
le_of_inf_le_sup_le (le_trans H.le_bot bot_le)
(by
rw [sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_trans (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le z) ?_
rw [sup_eq_right.2 hz]),
fun H => disjoint_sdiff_self_right.mono_left H⟩
#align disjoint_sdiff_iff_le disjoint_sdiff_iff_le
-- cf. `IsCompl.le_left_iff` and `IsCompl.le_right_iff`
theorem le_iff_disjoint_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ≤ x ↔ Disjoint z (y \ x) :=
(disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx).symm
#align le_iff_disjoint_sdiff le_iff_disjoint_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_left_eq_bot_iff` and `IsCompl.inf_right_eq_bot_iff`
theorem inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : z ⊓ y \ x = ⊥ ↔ z ≤ x := by
rw [← disjoint_iff]
exact disjoint_sdiff_iff_le hz hx
#align inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff inf_sdiff_eq_bot_iff
-- cf. `IsCompl.left_le_iff` and `IsCompl.right_le_iff`
theorem le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff (hz : z ≤ y) (hx : x ≤ y) : x ≤ z ↔ y = z ⊔ y \ x :=
⟨fun H => by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_lhs => rw [← sup_inf_sdiff y x]
apply sup_le_sup_right
rwa [inf_eq_right.2 hx]
· apply le_trans
· apply sup_le_sup_right hz
· rw [sup_sdiff_left],
fun H => by
conv_lhs at H => rw [← sup_sdiff_cancel_right hx]
refine le_of_inf_le_sup_le ?_ H.le
rw [inf_sdiff_self_right]
exact bot_le⟩
#align le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff le_iff_eq_sup_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.sup_inf`
theorem sdiff_sup : y \ (x ⊔ z) = y \ x ⊓ y \ z :=
sdiff_unique
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x ⊓ y \ z = (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊔ y \ z) := by
rw [sup_inf_left]
_ = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ x) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z) := by rw [@inf_sup_left _ _ y]
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y \ x)) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ (y ⊓ z ⊔ y \ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (y ⊓ z ⊔ y) ⊓ (y ⊓ x ⊔ y) := by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, sup_inf_sdiff]
_ = (y ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y ⊔ y ⊓ x) := by ac_rfl
_ = y := by rw [sup_inf_self, sup_inf_self, inf_idem])
(calc
y ⊓ (x ⊔ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) = (y ⊓ x ⊔ y ⊓ z) ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_left]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) ⊔ y ⊓ z ⊓ (y \ x ⊓ y \ z) := by rw [inf_sup_right]
_ = y ⊓ x ⊓ y \ x ⊓ y \ z ⊔ y \ x ⊓ (y \ z ⊓ (y ⊓ z)) := by ac_rfl
_ = ⊥ := by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, bot_inf_eq, bot_sup_eq, inf_comm (y \ z),
inf_inf_sdiff, inf_bot_eq])
#align sdiff_sup sdiff_sup
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf : y \ x = y \ z ↔ y ⊓ x = y ⊓ z :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_inf_eq_sup_eq (by rw [inf_inf_sdiff, h, inf_inf_sdiff])
(by rw [sup_inf_sdiff, h, sup_inf_sdiff]),
fun h => by rw [← sdiff_inf_self_right, ← sdiff_inf_self_right z y, inf_comm, h, inf_comm]⟩
#align sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint y x :=
calc
x \ y = x ↔ x \ y = x \ ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_bot]
_ ↔ x ⊓ y = x ⊓ ⊥ := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
_ ↔ Disjoint y x := by rw [inf_bot_eq, inf_comm, disjoint_iff]
#align sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' : x \ y = x ↔ Disjoint x y := by
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint, disjoint_comm]
#align sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint' sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint'
| Mathlib/Order/BooleanAlgebra.lean | 319 | 322 | theorem sdiff_lt (hx : y ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ ⊥) : x \ y < x := by |
refine sdiff_le.lt_of_ne fun h => hy ?_
rw [sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint', disjoint_iff] at h
rw [← h, inf_eq_right.mpr hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse tan function.
(This is delayed as it is easier to set up after developing complex trigonometric functions.)
Basic inequalities on trigonometric functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter
open Set Filter
open Real
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- Inverse of the `sin` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ≤ π / 2`.
It defaults to `-π / 2` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `π / 2` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arcsin : ℝ → ℝ :=
Subtype.val ∘ IccExtend (neg_le_self zero_le_one) sinOrderIso.symm
#align real.arcsin Real.arcsin
theorem arcsin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arcsin_mem_Icc Real.arcsin_mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem range_arcsin : range arcsin = Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) := by
rw [arcsin, range_comp Subtype.val]
simp [Icc]
#align real.range_arcsin Real.range_arcsin
theorem arcsin_le_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : arcsin x ≤ π / 2 :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).2
#align real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin (x : ℝ) : -(π / 2) ≤ arcsin x :=
(arcsin_mem_Icc x).1
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin
theorem arcsin_projIcc (x : ℝ) :
arcsin (projIcc (-1) 1 (neg_le_self zero_le_one) x) = arcsin x := by
rw [arcsin, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend_val, Function.comp_apply, IccExtend,
Function.comp_apply]
#align real.arcsin_proj_Icc Real.arcsin_projIcc
theorem sin_arcsin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x := by
simpa [arcsin, IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hx, -OrderIso.apply_symm_apply] using
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (sinOrderIso.apply_symm_apply ⟨x, hx⟩)
#align real.sin_arcsin' Real.sin_arcsin'
theorem sin_arcsin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : sin (arcsin x) = x :=
sin_arcsin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.sin_arcsin Real.sin_arcsin
theorem arcsin_sin' {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) hx <| by rw [sin_arcsin (neg_one_le_sin _) (sin_le_one _)]
#align real.arcsin_sin' Real.arcsin_sin'
theorem arcsin_sin {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π / 2) : arcsin (sin x) = x :=
arcsin_sin' ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_sin Real.arcsin_sin
theorem strictMonoOn_arcsin : StrictMonoOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
(Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp_strictMonoOn <|
sinOrderIso.symm.strictMono.strictMonoOn_IccExtend _
#align real.strict_mono_on_arcsin Real.strictMonoOn_arcsin
theorem monotone_arcsin : Monotone arcsin :=
(Subtype.mono_coe _).comp <| sinOrderIso.symm.monotone.IccExtend _
#align real.monotone_arcsin Real.monotone_arcsin
theorem injOn_arcsin : InjOn arcsin (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictMonoOn_arcsin.injOn
#align real.inj_on_arcsin Real.injOn_arcsin
theorem arcsin_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arcsin x = arcsin y ↔ x = y :=
injOn_arcsin.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
#align real.arcsin_inj Real.arcsin_inj
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_arcsin : Continuous arcsin :=
continuous_subtype_val.comp sinOrderIso.symm.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align real.continuous_arcsin Real.continuous_arcsin
theorem continuousAt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : ContinuousAt arcsin x :=
continuous_arcsin.continuousAt
#align real.continuous_at_arcsin Real.continuousAt_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq {x y : ℝ} (h₁ : sin x = y) (h₂ : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin y = x := by
subst y
exact injOn_sin (arcsin_mem_Icc _) h₂ (sin_arcsin' (sin_mem_Icc x))
#align real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq Real.arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_zero : arcsin 0 = 0 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_zero ⟨neg_nonpos.2 pi_div_two_pos.le, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩
#align real.arcsin_zero Real.arcsin_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_one : arcsin 1 = π / 2 :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq sin_pi_div_two <| right_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_one Real.arcsin_one
theorem arcsin_of_one_le {x : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) : arcsin x = π / 2 := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_right_le _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_one_le Real.arcsin_of_one_le
theorem arcsin_neg_one : arcsin (-1) = -(π / 2) :=
arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq (by rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]) <|
left_mem_Icc.2 (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le)
#align real.arcsin_neg_one Real.arcsin_neg_one
theorem arcsin_of_le_neg_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ -1) : arcsin x = -(π / 2) := by
rw [← arcsin_projIcc, projIcc_of_le_left _ hx, Subtype.coe_mk, arcsin_neg_one]
#align real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one Real.arcsin_of_le_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_neg (x : ℝ) : arcsin (-x) = -arcsin x := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, neg_neg, arcsin_of_one_le (le_neg.2 hx₁)]
rcases le_total 1 x with hx₂ | hx₂
· rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂, arcsin_of_le_neg_one (neg_le_neg hx₂)]
refine arcsin_eq_of_sin_eq ?_ ?_
· rw [sin_neg, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
· exact ⟨neg_le_neg (arcsin_le_pi_div_two _), neg_le.2 (neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _)⟩
#align real.arcsin_neg Real.arcsin_neg
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rw [← arcsin_sin' hy, strictMonoOn_arcsin.le_iff_le hx (sin_mem_Icc _), arcsin_sin' hy]
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin
theorem arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ sin y := by
rcases le_total x (-1) with hx₁ | hx₁
· simp [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁, hy.1, hx₁.trans (neg_one_le_sin _)]
cases' lt_or_le 1 x with hx₂ hx₂
· simp [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, hy.2.not_le, (sin_le_one y).trans_lt hx₂]
exact arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ (mem_Icc_of_Ico hy)
#align real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' Real.arcsin_le_iff_le_sin'
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg,
arcsin_le_iff_le_sin ⟨neg_le_neg hy.2, neg_le.2 hy.1⟩ ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_le.2 hx.1⟩, sin_neg,
neg_le_neg_iff]
#align real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le Real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le
theorem le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x ≤ arcsin y ↔ sin x ≤ y := by
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← arcsin_neg, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' ⟨neg_le_neg hx.2, neg_lt.2 hx.1⟩,
sin_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
#align real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' Real.le_arcsin_iff_sin_le'
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le hy hx).trans not_le
#align real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin Real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin
theorem arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x < y ↔ x < sin y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' hy).trans not_le
#align real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' Real.arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin'
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (hy : y ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin hy hx).trans not_le
#align real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt Real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt
theorem lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' {x y : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ico (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
x < arcsin y ↔ sin x < y :=
not_le.symm.trans <| (not_congr <| arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' hx).trans not_le
#align real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' Real.lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt'
theorem arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin {x y : ℝ} (hy : y ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :
arcsin x = y ↔ x = sin y := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, arcsin_le_iff_le_sin' (mem_Ico_of_Ioo hy),
le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' (mem_Ioc_of_Ioo hy)]
#align real.arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin Real.arcsin_eq_iff_eq_sin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonneg {x : ℝ} : 0 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 0 ≤ x :=
(le_arcsin_iff_sin_le' ⟨neg_lt_zero.2 pi_div_two_pos, pi_div_two_pos.le⟩).trans <| by
rw [sin_zero]
#align real.arcsin_nonneg Real.arcsin_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_nonpos {x : ℝ} : arcsin x ≤ 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.symm.trans <| arcsin_neg x ▸ arcsin_nonneg.trans neg_nonneg
#align real.arcsin_nonpos Real.arcsin_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
#align real.arcsin_eq_zero_iff Real.arcsin_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_arcsin_iff {x} : 0 = arcsin x ↔ x = 0 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_zero_iff
#align real.zero_eq_arcsin_iff Real.zero_eq_arcsin_iff
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arcsin x ↔ 0 < x :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonpos
#align real.arcsin_pos Real.arcsin_pos
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_zero {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < 0 ↔ x < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arcsin_nonneg
#align real.arcsin_lt_zero Real.arcsin_lt_zero
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x < π / 2 ↔ x < 1 :=
(arcsin_lt_iff_lt_sin' (right_mem_Ioc.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)).trans <| by
rw [sin_pi_div_two]
#align real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin {x : ℝ} : -(π / 2) < arcsin x ↔ -1 < x :=
(lt_arcsin_iff_sin_lt' <| left_mem_Ico.2 <| neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos).trans <| by
rw [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two]
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = π / 2 ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 h').ne h, arcsin_of_one_le⟩
#align real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : π / 2 = arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_pi_div_two
#align real.pi_div_two_eq_arcsin Real.pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_two_le_arcsin {x} : π / 2 ≤ arcsin x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
(arcsin_le_pi_div_two x).le_iff_eq.trans pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
#align real.pi_div_two_le_arcsin Real.pi_div_two_le_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} : arcsin x = -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
⟨fun h => not_lt.1 fun h' => (neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 h').ne' h, arcsin_of_le_neg_one⟩
#align real.arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin {x} : -(π / 2) = arcsin x ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
eq_comm.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
#align real.neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin Real.neg_pi_div_two_eq_arcsin
@[simp]
theorem arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two {x} : arcsin x ≤ -(π / 2) ↔ x ≤ -1 :=
(neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x).le_iff_eq.trans arcsin_eq_neg_pi_div_two
#align real.arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two Real.arcsin_le_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem pi_div_four_le_arcsin {x} : π / 4 ≤ arcsin x ↔ √2 / 2 ≤ x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_four, le_arcsin_iff_sin_le']
have := pi_pos
constructor <;> linarith
#align real.pi_div_four_le_arcsin Real.pi_div_four_le_arcsin
theorem mapsTo_sin_Ioo : MapsTo sin (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Ioo (-1) 1) := fun x h => by
rwa [mem_Ioo, ← arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, ← neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, arcsin_sin h.1.le h.2.le]
#align real.maps_to_sin_Ioo Real.mapsTo_sin_Ioo
/-- `Real.sin` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-π / 2, π / 2)` and `(-1, 1)`. -/
@[simp]
def sinPartialHomeomorph : PartialHomeomorph ℝ ℝ where
toFun := sin
invFun := arcsin
source := Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
target := Ioo (-1) 1
map_source' := mapsTo_sin_Ioo
map_target' _ hy := ⟨neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin.2 hy.1, arcsin_lt_pi_div_two.2 hy.2⟩
left_inv' _ hx := arcsin_sin hx.1.le hx.2.le
right_inv' _ hy := sin_arcsin hy.1.le hy.2.le
open_source := isOpen_Ioo
open_target := isOpen_Ioo
continuousOn_toFun := continuous_sin.continuousOn
continuousOn_invFun := continuous_arcsin.continuousOn
#align real.sin_local_homeomorph Real.sinPartialHomeomorph
theorem cos_arcsin_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ cos (arcsin x) :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _, arcsin_le_pi_div_two _⟩
#align real.cos_arcsin_nonneg Real.cos_arcsin_nonneg
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem cos_arcsin (x : ℝ) : cos (arcsin x) = √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₁
rw [arcsin_of_le_neg_one hx₁.le, cos_neg, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· rw [not_le] at hx₂
rw [arcsin_of_one_le hx₂.le, cos_pi_div_two, sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos]
nlinarith
have : sin (arcsin x) ^ 2 + cos (arcsin x) ^ 2 = 1 := sin_sq_add_cos_sq (arcsin x)
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', ← sqrt_inj (sq_nonneg _) (sub_nonneg.2 (sin_sq_le_one (arcsin x))), sq,
sqrt_mul_self (cos_arcsin_nonneg _)] at this
rw [this, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
#align real.cos_arcsin Real.cos_arcsin
-- The junk values for `arcsin` and `sqrt` make this true even outside `[-1, 1]`.
theorem tan_arcsin (x : ℝ) : tan (arcsin x) = x / √(1 - x ^ 2) := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_arcsin]
by_cases hx₁ : -1 ≤ x; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
by_cases hx₂ : x ≤ 1; swap
· have h : √(1 - x ^ 2) = 0 := sqrt_eq_zero_of_nonpos (by nlinarith)
rw [h]
simp
rw [sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
#align real.tan_arcsin Real.tan_arcsin
/-- Inverse of the `cos` function, returns values in the range `0 ≤ arccos x` and `arccos x ≤ π`.
It defaults to `π` on `(-∞, -1)` and to `0` to `(1, ∞)`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented
noncomputable def arccos (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
π / 2 - arcsin x
#align real.arccos Real.arccos
theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin (x : ℝ) : arccos x = π / 2 - arcsin x :=
rfl
#align real.arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin Real.arccos_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arcsin
theorem arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos (x : ℝ) : arcsin x = π / 2 - arccos x := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos Real.arcsin_eq_pi_div_two_sub_arccos
theorem arccos_le_pi (x : ℝ) : arccos x ≤ π := by
unfold arccos; linarith [neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin x]
#align real.arccos_le_pi Real.arccos_le_pi
theorem arccos_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ arccos x := by
unfold arccos; linarith [arcsin_le_pi_div_two x]
#align real.arccos_nonneg Real.arccos_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem arccos_pos {x : ℝ} : 0 < arccos x ↔ x < 1 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_pos Real.arccos_pos
theorem cos_arccos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) : cos (arccos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, cos_pi_div_two_sub, sin_arcsin hx₁ hx₂]
#align real.cos_arccos Real.cos_arccos
theorem arccos_cos {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π) : arccos (cos x) = x := by
rw [arccos, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub, arcsin_sin] <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg] <;> linarith
#align real.arccos_cos Real.arccos_cos
lemma arccos_eq_of_eq_cos (hy₀ : 0 ≤ y) (hy₁ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x = cos y) : arccos x = y := by
rw [hxy, arccos_cos hy₀ hy₁]
theorem strictAntiOn_arccos : StrictAntiOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) := fun _ hx _ hy h =>
sub_lt_sub_left (strictMonoOn_arcsin hx hy h) _
#align real.strict_anti_on_arccos Real.strictAntiOn_arccos
theorem arccos_injOn : InjOn arccos (Icc (-1) 1) :=
strictAntiOn_arccos.injOn
#align real.arccos_inj_on Real.arccos_injOn
theorem arccos_inj {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -1 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ 1) (hy₁ : -1 ≤ y) (hy₂ : y ≤ 1) :
arccos x = arccos y ↔ x = y :=
arccos_injOn.eq_iff ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩
#align real.arccos_inj Real.arccos_inj
@[simp]
theorem arccos_zero : arccos 0 = π / 2 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_zero Real.arccos_zero
@[simp]
theorem arccos_one : arccos 1 = 0 := by simp [arccos]
#align real.arccos_one Real.arccos_one
@[simp]
theorem arccos_neg_one : arccos (-1) = π := by simp [arccos, add_halves]
#align real.arccos_neg_one Real.arccos_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arccos_eq_zero {x} : arccos x = 0 ↔ 1 ≤ x := by simp [arccos, sub_eq_zero]
#align real.arccos_eq_zero Real.arccos_eq_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Inverse.lean | 402 | 402 | theorem arccos_eq_pi_div_two {x} : arccos x = π / 2 ↔ x = 0 := by | simp [arccos]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
#align_import algebra.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `Finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation.
Let `s` be a `Finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
## Implementation Notes
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists AddCommMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
variable {ι κ α β γ : Type*}
open Fin Function
namespace Finset
/-- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x ∈ s, f x` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : β :=
(s.1.map f).prod
#align finset.prod Finset.prod
#align finset.sum Finset.sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (hs : s.Nodup) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : Finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_mk Finset.prod_mk
#align finset.sum_mk Finset.sum_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_val [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) : s.1.prod = s.prod id := by
rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_val Finset.prod_val
#align finset.sum_val Finset.sum_val
end Finset
library_note "operator precedence of big operators"/--
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k ∈ K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k ∈ K, a k + ∑ k ∈ K, b k →
∏ k ∈ K, a k * b k = (∏ k ∈ K, a k) * (∏ k ∈ K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
namespace BigOperators
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder Lean Meta
-- TODO: contribute this modification back to `extBinder`
/-- A `bigOpBinder` is like an `extBinder` and has the form `x`, `x : ty`, or `x pred`
where `pred` is a `binderPred` like `< 2`.
Unlike `extBinder`, `x` is a term. -/
syntax bigOpBinder := term:max ((" : " term) <|> binderPred)?
/-- A BigOperator binder in parentheses -/
syntax bigOpBinderParenthesized := " (" bigOpBinder ")"
/-- A list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinderCollection := bigOpBinderParenthesized+
/-- A single (unparenthesized) binder, or a list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinders := bigOpBinderCollection <|> (ppSpace bigOpBinder)
/-- Collects additional binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinder`.
Note: this is not extensible at the moment, unlike the usual `bigOpBinder` expansions. -/
def processBigOpBinder (processed : (Array (Term × Term)))
(binder : TSyntax ``bigOpBinder) : MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
set_option hygiene false in
withRef binder do
match binder with
| `(bigOpBinder| $x:term) =>
match x with
| `(($a + $b = $n)) => -- Maybe this is too cute.
return processed |>.push (← `(⟨$a, $b⟩), ← `(Finset.Nat.antidiagonal $n))
| _ => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``(Finset.univ))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x : $t) => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``((Finset.univ : Finset $t)))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ∈ $s) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(finset% $s))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x < $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iio $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≤ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iic $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x > $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ioi $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≥ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ici $n))
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collects the binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinders`. -/
def processBigOpBinders (binders : TSyntax ``bigOpBinders) :
MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
match binders with
| `(bigOpBinders| $b:bigOpBinder) => processBigOpBinder #[] b
| `(bigOpBinders| $[($bs:bigOpBinder)]*) => bs.foldlM processBigOpBinder #[]
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collect the binderIdents into a `⟨...⟩` expression. -/
def bigOpBindersPattern (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
let ts := processed.map Prod.fst
if ts.size == 1 then
return ts[0]!
else
`(⟨$ts,*⟩)
/-- Collect the terms into a product of sets. -/
def bigOpBindersProd (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
if processed.isEmpty then
`((Finset.univ : Finset Unit))
else if processed.size == 1 then
return processed[0]!.2
else
processed.foldrM (fun s p => `(SProd.sprod $(s.2) $p)) processed.back.2
(start := processed.size - 1)
/--
- `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∑ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∑ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.sum (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∑ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∑" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigsum) "∑ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
/--
- `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∏ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∏ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.prod (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∏ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∏" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigprod) "∏ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsum)
| `(∑ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.sum (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.sum $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
macro_rules (kind := bigprod)
| `(∏ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.prod (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.prod $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
/-- (Deprecated, use `∑ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigsumin) "∑ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsumin)
| `(∑ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∑ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
/-- (Deprecated, use `∏ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigprodin) "∏ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigprodin)
| `(∏ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∏ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
open Lean Meta Parser.Term PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.prod`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the product is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.prod] def delabFinsetProd : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∏ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∏ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.sum`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the sum is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.sum] def delabFinsetSum : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∑ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∑ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
end BigOperators
namespace Finset
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_multiset_prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod
#align finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_val [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.1.map f).prod = ∏ a ∈ s, f a :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_map_val Finset.prod_map_val
#align finset.sum_map_val Finset.sum_map_val
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = s.fold ((· * ·) : β → β → β) 1 f :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_fold Finset.prod_eq_fold
#align finset.sum_eq_fold Finset.sum_eq_fold
@[simp]
theorem sum_multiset_singleton (s : Finset α) : (s.sum fun x => {x}) = s.val := by
simp only [sum_eq_multiset_sum, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align finset.sum_multiset_singleton Finset.sum_multiset_singleton
end Finset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_prod [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {G : Type*} [FunLike G β γ] [MonoidHomClass G β γ]
(g : G) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : g (∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g (f x) := by
simp only [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align map_prod map_prod
#align map_sum map_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, ⇑(f x) :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.coeFn β γ) _ _
#align monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_finset_sum AddMonoidHom.coe_finset_sum
/-- See also `Finset.prod_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"See also `Finset.sum_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ`"]
theorem MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α)
(b : β) : (∏ x ∈ s, f x) b = ∏ x ∈ s, f x b :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.eval b) _ _
#align monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply AddMonoidHom.finset_sum_apply
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_empty : ∏ x ∈ ∅, f x = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_empty Finset.prod_empty
#align finset.sum_empty Finset.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_of_empty Finset.prod_of_empty
#align finset.sum_of_empty Finset.sum_of_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (h : a ∉ s) : ∏ x ∈ cons a s h, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.prod_cons Finset.prod_cons
#align finset.sum_cons Finset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_insert [DecidableEq α] : a ∉ s → ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_insert
#align finset.prod_insert Finset.prod_insert
#align finset.sum_insert Finset.sum_insert
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
by_cases hm : a ∈ s
· simp_rw [insert_eq_of_mem hm]
· rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem Finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem
#align finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
#align finset.prod_insert_one Finset.prod_insert_one
#align finset.sum_insert_zero Finset.sum_insert_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_insert_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) {f : α → M} :
(∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x) / f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ∏ x ∈ singleton a, f x = f a :=
Eq.trans fold_singleton <| mul_one _
#align finset.prod_singleton Finset.prod_singleton
#align finset.sum_singleton Finset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pair [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x ∈ ({a, b} : Finset α), f x) = f a * f b := by
rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_pair Finset.prod_pair
#align finset.sum_pair Finset.sum_pair
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const_one : (∏ _x ∈ s, (1 : β)) = 1 := by
simp only [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_const', Multiset.prod_replicate, one_pow]
#align finset.prod_const_one Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.sum_const_zero Finset.sum_const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_image [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) → ∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
#align finset.prod_image Finset.prod_image
#align finset.sum_image Finset.sum_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map (s : Finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.map e, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (e x) := by
rw [Finset.prod, Finset.map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_map Finset.prod_map
#align finset.sum_map Finset.sum_map
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s.attach, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
classical rw [← prod_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn, attach_image_val]
#align finset.prod_attach Finset.prod_attach
#align finset.sum_attach Finset.sum_attach
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g := by
rw [h]; exact fold_congr
#align finset.prod_congr Finset.prod_congr
#align finset.sum_congr Finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ _x ∈ s, 1 := Finset.prod_congr rfl h
_ = 1 := Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_one Finset.prod_eq_one
#align finset.sum_eq_zero Finset.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjUnion (h) :
∏ x ∈ s₁.disjUnion s₂ h, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjUnion h)
rw [one_mul]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_union Finset.prod_disjUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_union Finset.sum_disjUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjiUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Finset α) (h) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjiUnion t h, f x = ∏ i ∈ s, ∏ x ∈ t i, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjiUnion h)
dsimp [Finset.prod, Multiset.prod, Multiset.fold, Finset.disjUnion, Finset.fold]
congr
exact prod_const_one.symm
#align finset.prod_disj_Union Finset.prod_disjiUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_Union Finset.sum_disjiUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union_inter [DecidableEq α] :
(∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
fold_union_inter
#align finset.prod_union_inter Finset.prod_union_inter
#align finset.sum_union_inter Finset.sum_union_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union [DecidableEq α] (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h]; exact (mul_one _).symm
#align finset.prod_union Finset.prod_union
#align finset.sum_union Finset.sum_union
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
(s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
have := Classical.decEq α
rw [← prod_union (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s s p), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
section ToList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_to_list (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.toList.map f).prod = s.prod f := by
rw [Finset.prod, ← Multiset.prod_coe, ← Multiset.map_coe, Finset.coe_toList]
#align finset.prod_to_list Finset.prod_to_list
#align finset.sum_to_list Finset.sum_to_list
end ToList
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (prod_map s σ.toEmbedding f).symm
exact (map_perm hs).symm
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp Equiv.Perm.prod_comp
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp Equiv.Perm.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp' (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x) x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x (σ.symm x) := by
convert σ.prod_comp s (fun x => f x (σ.symm x)) hs
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp' Equiv.Perm.prod_comp'
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp' Equiv.Perm.sum_comp'
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (insert a s).powerset, f t =
(∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) * ∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f (insert a t) := by
rw [powerset_insert, prod_union, prod_image]
· exact insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn.mono fun t ht ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 ht) ha
· aesop (add simp [disjoint_left, insert_subset_iff])
#align finset.prod_powerset_insert Finset.prod_powerset_insert
#align finset.sum_powerset_insert Finset.sum_powerset_insert
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (s.cons a ha).powerset, f t = (∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) *
∏ t ∈ s.powerset.attach, f (cons a t $ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 t.2) ha) := by
classical
simp_rw [cons_eq_insert]
rw [prod_powerset_insert ha, prod_attach _ fun t ↦ f (insert a t)]
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset (s : Finset α) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ powerset s, f t = ∏ j ∈ range (card s + 1), ∏ t ∈ powersetCard j s, f t := by
rw [powerset_card_disjiUnion, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_powerset Finset.prod_powerset
#align finset.sum_powerset Finset.sum_powerset
end CommMonoid
end Finset
section
open Finset
variable [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompl.prod_mul_prod {s t : Finset α} (h : IsCompl s t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ t, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(Finset.prod_disjUnion h.disjoint).symm.trans <| by
classical rw [Finset.disjUnion_eq_union, ← Finset.sup_eq_union, h.sup_eq_top]; rfl
#align is_compl.prod_mul_prod IsCompl.prod_mul_prod
#align is_compl.sum_add_sum IsCompl.sum_add_sum
end
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
/-- Multiplying the products of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole product.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype`. -/
@[to_additive "Adding the sums of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole sum.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype`. "]
theorem prod_mul_prod_compl [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
IsCompl.prod_mul_prod isCompl_compl f
#align finset.prod_mul_prod_compl Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl
#align finset.sum_add_sum_compl Finset.sum_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_compl_mul_prod [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(@isCompl_compl _ s _).symm.prod_mul_prod f
#align finset.prod_compl_mul_prod Finset.prod_compl_mul_prod
#align finset.sum_compl_add_sum Finset.sum_compl_add_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i ∈ s₁, f i = ∏ i ∈ s₂, g i := by
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul]
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
#align finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
#align finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
prod_subset_one_on_sdiff h (by simpa) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.prod_subset Finset.prod_subset
#align finset.sum_subset Finset.sum_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_disj_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : Sum α γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f (Sum.inl x)) * ∏ x ∈ t, f (Sum.inr x) := by
rw [← map_inl_disjUnion_map_inr, prod_disjUnion, prod_map, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_sum Finset.prod_disj_sum
#align finset.sum_disj_sum Finset.sum_disj_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sum_elim (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, Sum.elim f g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by simp
#align finset.prod_sum_elim Finset.prod_sum_elim
#align finset.sum_sum_elim Finset.sum_sum_elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_biUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α}
(hs : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) : ∏ x ∈ s.biUnion t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ i ∈ t x, f i := by
rw [← disjiUnion_eq_biUnion _ _ hs, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_bUnion Finset.prod_biUnion
#align finset.sum_bUnion Finset.sum_biUnion
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the product of fiberwise products. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.prod_sigma'`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the sum of fiberwise sums. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.sum_sigma'`"]
theorem prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : Sigma σ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x = ∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ := by
simp_rw [← disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk, prod_disjiUnion, prod_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
#align finset.prod_sigma Finset.prod_sigma
#align finset.sum_sigma Finset.sum_sigma
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sigma' {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : ∀ a, σ a → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f a s) = ∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x.1 x.2 :=
Eq.symm <| prod_sigma s t fun x => f x.1 x.2
#align finset.prod_sigma' Finset.prod_sigma'
#align finset.sum_sigma' Finset.sum_sigma'
section bij
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α}
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the product, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the sum, rather than being a non-dependent function."]
theorem prod_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
congr_arg Multiset.prod (Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi i_inj i_surj h)
#align finset.prod_bij Finset.prod_bij
#align finset.sum_bij Finset.sum_bij
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the products, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the sums, rather than being non-dependent functions."]
theorem prod_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, ι) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
refine prod_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩) h
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
#align finset.prod_bij' Finset.prod_bij'
#align finset.sum_bij' Finset.sum_bij'
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the sum."]
lemma prod_nbij (i : ι → κ) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set ι).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set ι).SurjOn i t) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj) h
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the products.
The difference with `Finset.prod_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the products, rather than on the entire types.
-/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the sums.
The difference with `Finset.sum_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the sums, rather than on the entire types."]
lemma prod_nbij' (i : ι → κ) (j : κ → ι) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv h
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := by refine prod_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hfg <;> simp [hst]
#align finset.equiv.prod_comp_finset Finset.prod_equiv
#align finset.equiv.sum_comp_finset Finset.sum_equiv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst hfg
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injOn (e : ι → κ) (he : Set.InjOn e s) (hest : Set.MapsTo e s t)
(h' : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ e '' s → g i = 1) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ j ∈ t, g j := by
classical
exact (prod_nbij e (fun a ↦ mem_image_of_mem e) he (by simp [Set.surjOn_image]) h).trans <|
prod_subset (image_subset_iff.2 hest) <| by simpa using h'
variable [DecidableEq κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f (g i) :=
prod_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hi).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h]
#align finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to
#align finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x ↦ g x = y, f (g x) :=
prod_congr rfl fun y _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hx).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to h _
variable [Fintype κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
#align finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.prod_fiberwise
#align finset.sum_fiberwise Finset.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
end bij
/-- Taking a product over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the product over `Fintype.piFinset t`.
`univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`, but differ
in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the sum over
`Fintype.piFinset t`. `univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`,
but differ in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`."]
lemma prod_univ_pi [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {κ : ι → Type*} (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i))
(f : (∀ i ∈ (univ : Finset ι), κ i) → β) :
∏ x ∈ univ.pi t, f x = ∏ x ∈ Fintype.piFinset t, f fun a _ ↦ x a := by
apply prod_nbij' (fun x i ↦ x i $ mem_univ _) (fun x i _ ↦ x i) <;> simp
#align finset.prod_univ_pi Finset.prod_univ_pi
#align finset.sum_univ_pi Finset.sum_univ_pi
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_diag [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α × α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s.diag, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f (i, i) := by
apply prod_nbij' Prod.fst (fun i ↦ (i, i)) <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (c, a) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.1, p.2))
apply prod_equiv (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product Finset.prod_finset_product
#align finset.sum_finset_product Finset.sum_finset_product
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product' (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f c a :=
prod_finset_product r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product' Finset.prod_finset_product'
#align finset.sum_finset_product' Finset.sum_finset_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α × γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (a, c) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.2, p.1))
apply prod_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm) <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right Finset.prod_finset_product_right
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right Finset.sum_finset_product_right
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right' (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α → γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f a c :=
prod_finset_product_right r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right' Finset.prod_finset_product_right'
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right' Finset.sum_finset_product_right'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_image' [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀ c ∈ s, f (g c) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = g c, h x) :
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, h x :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = x, h x :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _x hx =>
let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx
hc ▸ eq c hcs
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, h x := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _x => mem_image_of_mem g) _
#align finset.prod_image' Finset.prod_image'
#align finset.sum_image' Finset.sum_image'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x * g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]; rfl) fold_op_distrib
#align finset.prod_mul_distrib Finset.prod_mul_distrib
#align finset.sum_add_distrib Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_comm (f g h i : α → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a * g a) * ∏ a ∈ s, h a * i a = (∏ a ∈ s, f a * h a) * ∏ a ∈ s, g a * i a := by
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product (s ×ˢ t) s (fun _a => t) fun _p => mem_product
#align finset.prod_product Finset.prod_product
#align finset.sum_product Finset.sum_product
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product`"]
theorem prod_product' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y :=
prod_product
#align finset.prod_product' Finset.prod_product'
#align finset.sum_product' Finset.sum_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product_right {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product_right (s ×ˢ t) t (fun _a => s) fun _p => mem_product.trans and_comm
#align finset.prod_product_right Finset.prod_product_right
#align finset.sum_product_right Finset.sum_product_right
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product_right`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product_right`"]
theorem prod_product_right' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_product_right
#align finset.prod_product_right' Finset.prod_product_right'
#align finset.sum_product_right' Finset.sum_product_right'
/-- Generalization of `Finset.prod_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on the outer
variable. -/
@[to_additive "Generalization of `Finset.sum_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on
the outer variable."]
theorem prod_comm' {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α} {t' : Finset α} {s' : α → Finset γ}
(h : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t x ↔ x ∈ s' y ∧ y ∈ t') {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t x, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t', ∏ x ∈ s' y, f x y := by
classical
have : ∀ z : γ × α, (z ∈ s.biUnion fun x => (t x).map <| Function.Embedding.sectr x _) ↔
z.1 ∈ s ∧ z.2 ∈ t z.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_map, Function.Embedding.sectr_apply, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right, ← and_assoc]
exact
(prod_finset_product' _ _ _ this).symm.trans
((prod_finset_product_right' _ _ _) fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (this _).trans ((h x y).trans and_comm))
#align finset.prod_comm' Finset.prod_comm'
#align finset.sum_comm' Finset.sum_comm'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_comm' fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align finset.prod_comm Finset.prod_comm
#align finset.sum_comm Finset.sum_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [CommMonoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀ a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (∏ x ∈ s, f x) (∏ x ∈ s, g x) := by
delta Finset.prod
apply Multiset.prod_hom_rel <;> assumption
#align finset.prod_hom_rel Finset.prod_hom_rel
#align finset.sum_hom_rel Finset.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
(prod_subset (filter_subset _ _)) fun x => by
classical
rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter]
exact fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨h₁, by simpa using hp _ h₁ h₂⟩
#align finset.prod_filter_of_ne Finset.prod_filter_of_ne
#align finset.sum_filter_of_ne Finset.sum_filter_of_ne
-- If we use `[DecidableEq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `Decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_ne_one (s : Finset α) [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_filter_of_ne fun _ _ => id
#align finset.prod_filter_ne_one Finset.prod_filter_ne_one
#align finset.sum_filter_ne_zero Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α → β) :
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 :=
calc
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :=
prod_congr rfl fun a h => by rw [if_pos]; simpa using (mem_filter.1 h).2
_ = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 := by
{ refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) fun x hs h => ?_
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h
exact if_neg (by simpa using h hs) }
#align finset.prod_filter Finset.prod_filter
#align finset.sum_filter Finset.sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h : a ∈ s)
(h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ {a}, f x := by
{ refine (prod_subset ?_ ?_).symm
· intro _ H
rwa [mem_singleton.1 H]
· simpa only [mem_singleton] }
_ = f a := prod_singleton _ _
#align finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1)
(h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
by_cases (prod_eq_single_of_mem a · h₀) fun this =>
(prod_congr rfl fun b hb => h₀ b hb <| by rintro rfl; exact this hb).trans <|
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm
#align finset.prod_eq_single Finset.prod_eq_single
#align finset.sum_eq_single Finset.sum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_left [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₂, a ∉ s₁ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₁, f a :=
Eq.symm <|
prod_subset subset_union_left fun _a ha ha' ↦ hs _ ((mem_union.1 ha).resolve_left ha') ha'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_right [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₁, a ∉ s₂ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₂, f a := by rw [union_comm, prod_union_eq_left hs]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s)
(hn : a ≠ b) (h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; let s' := ({a, b} : Finset α)
have hu : s' ⊆ s := by
refine insert_subset_iff.mpr ?_
apply And.intro ha
apply singleton_subset_iff.mpr hb
have hf : ∀ c ∈ s, c ∉ s' → f c = 1 := by
intro c hc hcs
apply h₀ c hc
apply not_or.mp
intro hab
apply hcs
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
exact hab
rw [← prod_subset hu hf]
exact Finset.prod_pair hn
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (hn : a ≠ b)
(h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) (ha : a ∉ s → f a = 1) (hb : b ∉ s → f b = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; by_cases h₁ : a ∈ s <;> by_cases h₂ : b ∈ s
· exact prod_eq_mul_of_mem a b h₁ h₂ hn h₀
· rw [hb h₂, mul_one]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem a h₁
exact fun c hc hca => h₀ c hc ⟨hca, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩
· rw [ha h₁, one_mul]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem b h₂
exact fun c hc hcb => h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, hcb⟩
· rw [ha h₁, hb h₂, mul_one]
exact
_root_.trans
(prod_congr rfl fun c hc =>
h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩)
prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_mul Finset.prod_eq_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_add Finset.sum_eq_add
-- Porting note: simpNF linter complains that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)
"A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
theorem prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x := by
conv_lhs => erw [← prod_map (s.subtype p) (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f]
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) fun x _hx => rfl
#align finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
theorem prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem]
simpa using h
#align finset.prod_subtype_of_mem Finset.prod_subtype_of_mem
#align finset.sum_subtype_of_mem Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem
/-- A product of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`."]
theorem prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : Finset { x // p x }} {f : { x // p x } → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : { x // p x }, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
(∏ x ∈ s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [Finset.prod_map]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h
#align finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding Finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding
#align finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding
variable (f s)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort_eq_attach (f : s → β) : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.attach, f i :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach
#align finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := prod_attach _ _
#align finset.prod_coe_sort Finset.prod_coe_sort
#align finset.sum_coe_sort Finset.sum_coe_sort
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_coe (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (∏ i : (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_coe_sort s f
#align finset.prod_finset_coe Finset.prod_finset_coe
#align finset.sum_finset_coe Finset.sum_finset_coe
variable {f s}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype {p : α → Prop} {F : Fintype (Subtype p)} (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
(f : α → β) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
have : (· ∈ s) = p := Set.ext h
subst p
rw [← prod_coe_sort]
congr!
#align finset.prod_subtype Finset.prod_subtype
#align finset.sum_subtype Finset.sum_subtype
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' (f : ι → κ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter (· ∈ Set.range f), g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ image f (preimage s f hf), g x :=
Eq.symm <| prod_image <| by simpa only [mem_preimage, Set.InjOn] using hf
_ = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => x ∈ Set.range f, g x := by rw [image_preimage]
#align finset.prod_preimage' Finset.prod_preimage'
#align finset.sum_preimage' Finset.sum_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ Set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne]; exact fun x hx ↦ Not.imp_symm (hg x hx)
#align finset.prod_preimage Finset.prod_preimage
#align finset.sum_preimage Finset.sum_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf.injOn, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.injOn g fun _ hs h_f ↦ (h_f <| hf.subset_range hs).elim
#align finset.prod_preimage_of_bij Finset.prod_preimage_of_bij
#align finset.sum_preimage_of_bij Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set_coe (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (∏ i : s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
(Finset.prod_subtype s.toFinset (fun _ ↦ Set.mem_toFinset) f).symm
/-- The product of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the product of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 1` off `s`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the sum of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 0` off `s`."]
theorem prod_congr_set {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {β : Type*} [Fintype β] (s : Set β)
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : β → α) (g : s → α) (w : ∀ (x : β) (h : x ∈ s), f x = g ⟨x, h⟩)
(w' : ∀ x : β, x ∉ s → f x = 1) : Finset.univ.prod f = Finset.univ.prod g := by
rw [← @Finset.prod_subset _ _ s.toFinset Finset.univ f _ (by simp)]
· rw [Finset.prod_subtype]
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
exact fun ⟨x, h⟩ _ => w x h
· simp
· rintro x _ h
exact w' x (by simpa using h)
#align finset.prod_congr_set Finset.prod_congr_set
#align finset.sum_congr_set Finset.sum_congr_set
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p}
[DecidablePred fun x => ¬p x] (f : ∀ x : α, p x → γ) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
calc
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
∏ x ∈ s.filter (¬p ·), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :=
(prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s p _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ _).symm (prod_attach _ _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_congr rfl fun x _hx ↦
congr_arg h (dif_pos <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
(prod_congr rfl fun x _hx => congr_arg h (dif_neg <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
#align finset.prod_apply_dite Finset.prod_apply_dite
#align finset.sum_apply_dite Finset.sum_apply_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {_hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ)
(h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (f x)) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, h (g x) :=
(prod_apply_dite _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ (h ∘ f)) (prod_attach _ (h ∘ g))
#align finset.prod_apply_ite Finset.prod_apply_ite
#align finset.sum_apply_ite Finset.sum_apply_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f : ∀ x : α, p x → β)
(g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, g x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) := by
simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_dite Finset.prod_dite
#align finset.sum_dite Finset.sum_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, g x := by
simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_ite Finset.prod_ite
#align finset.sum_ite Finset.sum_ite
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 1,222 | 1,226 | theorem prod_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by |
rw [prod_ite, filter_false_of_mem, filter_true_of_mem]
· simp only [prod_empty, one_mul]
all_goals intros; apply h; assumption
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_singleton Nat.ofDigits_singleton
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_one_cons Nat.ofDigits_one_cons
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
#align nat.of_digits_append Nat.ofDigits_append
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
#align nat.coe_of_digits Nat.coe_ofDigits
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
#align nat.coe_int_of_digits Nat.coe_int_ofDigits
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
#align nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero Nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
#align nat.digits_of_digits Nat.digits_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
cases' b with b
· cases' n with n
· rfl
· change ofDigits 0 [n + 1] = n + 1
dsimp [ofDigits]
· cases' b with b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· apply Nat.strongInductionOn n _
clear n
intro n h
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
#align nat.of_digits_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
#align nat.of_digits_one Nat.ofDigits_one
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
#align nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero Nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
#align nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
#align nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div Nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
#align nat.digits_last Nat.digits_getLast
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
#align nat.digits.injective Nat.digits.injective
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
#align nat.digits_inj_iff Nat.digits_inj_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· have hb0 : b ≠ 0 := (Nat.succ_le_iff.1 hb).ne_bot
simp [h, log_eq_zero_iff, ← Nat.div_eq_zero_iff hb0.bot_lt]
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
#align nat.digits_len Nat.digits_len
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
#align nat.last_digit_ne_zero Nat.getLast_digit_ne_zero
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them-/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH d hd
cases' n with n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by simp)
-- Porting note: Previous code (single line) contained linarith.
-- . exact IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) (by linarith)) hd
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
#align nat.digits_lt_base' Nat.digits_lt_base'
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
#align nat.digits_lt_base Nat.digits_lt_base
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length'
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b > 1 -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits' Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits'
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.of_digits_digits_append_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits_append_digits
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp [List.replicate_add]
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append' _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp_arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
#align nat.digits_len_le_digits_len_succ Nat.digits_len_le_digits_len_succ
theorem le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
#align nat.le_digits_len_le Nat.le_digits_len_le
@[mono]
theorem ofDigits_monotone {p q : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : p ≤ q) : ofDigits p L ≤ ofDigits q L := by
induction' L with _ _ hi
· rfl
· simp only [ofDigits, cast_id, add_le_add_iff_left]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul h hi
theorem sum_le_ofDigits {p : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : 1 ≤ p) : L.sum ≤ ofDigits p L :=
(ofDigits_one L).symm ▸ ofDigits_monotone L h
theorem digit_sum_le (p n : ℕ) : List.sum (digits p n) ≤ n := by
induction' n with n
· exact digits_zero _ ▸ Nat.le_refl (List.sum [])
· induction' p with p
· rw [digits_zero_succ, List.sum_cons, List.sum_nil, add_zero]
· nth_rw 2 [← ofDigits_digits p.succ (n + 1)]
rw [← ofDigits_one <| digits p.succ n.succ]
exact ofDigits_monotone (digits p.succ n.succ) <| Nat.succ_pos p
theorem pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : l ≠ []) (hl2 : l.getLast hl ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ l.length ≤ (b + 2) * ofDigits (b + 2) l := by
rw [← List.dropLast_append_getLast hl]
simp only [List.length_append, List.length, zero_add, List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_append,
List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_singleton, add_comm (l.length - 1), pow_add, pow_one]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
have : 0 < l.getLast hl := by rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero]
convert Nat.mul_le_mul_left ((b + 2) ^ (l.length - 1)) this using 1
rw [Nat.mul_one]
#align nat.pow_length_le_mul_of_digits Nat.pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
(b+2)^((number of digits in the base (b+2) representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le' (b m : ℕ) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length ≤ (b + 2) * m := by
have : digits (b + 2) m ≠ [] := digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm
convert @pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits b (digits (b+2) m)
this (getLast_digit_ne_zero _ hm)
rw [ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.base_pow_length_digits_le' Nat.base_pow_length_digits_le'
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
b^((number of digits in the base b representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le (b m : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) :
m ≠ 0 → b ^ (digits b m).length ≤ b * m := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact base_pow_length_digits_le' b m
#align nat.base_pow_length_digits_le Nat.base_pow_length_digits_le
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p` is the same as interpreting the tail.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail {p : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ)
(w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) : ofDigits p digits / p = ofDigits p digits.tail := by
induction' digits with hd tl
· simp [ofDigits]
· refine Eq.trans (add_mul_div_left hd _ hpos) ?_
rw [Nat.div_eq_of_lt <| w₁ _ <| List.mem_cons_self _ _, zero_add]
rfl
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p^i` is the same as dropping `i`.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop
{p : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) :
ofDigits p digits / p ^ i = ofDigits p (digits.drop i) := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· rw [Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, hi, ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail hpos
(List.drop i digits) fun x hx ↦ w₁ x <| List.mem_of_mem_drop hx, ← List.drop_one,
List.drop_drop, add_comm]
/-- Dividing `n` by `p^i` is like truncating the first `i` digits of `n` in base `p`.
-/
lemma self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop {p : ℕ} (i n : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ p):
n / p ^ i = ofDigits p ((p.digits n).drop i) := by
convert ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop i (zero_lt_of_lt h) (p.digits n)
(fun l hl ↦ digits_lt_base h hl)
exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
open Finset
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ}
(L : List ℕ) {h_nonempty} (h_ne_zero : L.getLast h_nonempty ≠ 0) (h_lt : ∀ l ∈ L, l < p) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range L.length, (ofDigits p L) / p ^ i.succ = (ofDigits p L) - L.sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· induction' L with hd tl ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· simp only [List.length_cons, List.sum_cons, self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h,
digits_ofDigits p h (hd :: tl) h_lt (fun _ => h_ne_zero)]
simp only [ofDigits]
rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.cast_id]
simp only [List.drop, List.drop_length]
obtain rfl | h' := em <| tl = []
· simp [ofDigits]
· have w₁' := fun l hl ↦ h_lt l <| List.mem_cons_of_mem hd hl
have w₂' := fun (h : tl ≠ []) ↦ (List.getLast_cons h) ▸ h_ne_zero
have ih := ih (w₂' h') w₁'
simp only [self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h, digits_ofDigits p h tl w₁' w₂',
← Nat.one_add] at ih
have := sum_singleton (fun x ↦ ofDigits p <| tl.drop x) tl.length
rw [← Ico_succ_singleton, List.drop_length, ofDigits] at this
have h₁ : 1 ≤ tl.length := List.length_pos.mpr h'
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ <| h₁, ← add_zero (∑ x ∈ Ico _ _, ofDigits p (tl.drop x)),
← this, sum_Ico_consecutive _ h₁ <| (le_add_right tl.length 1),
← sum_Ico_add _ 0 tl.length 1,
Ico_zero_eq_range, mul_add, mul_add, ih, range_one, sum_singleton, List.drop, ofDigits,
mul_zero, add_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc <| sum_le_ofDigits _ <| Nat.le_of_lt h]
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul <| ofDigits p tl]
rw [← add_mul, one_eq_succ_zero, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| zero_lt_of_lt h,
Nat.add_sub_add_left]
· simp [ofDigits_one]
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases L
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits]
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (log p n).succ, n / p ^ i.succ = n - (p.digits n).sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· convert sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits (p.digits n) (getLast_digit_ne_zero p hn) <|
(fun l a ↦ digits_lt_base h a)
· refine (digits_len p n h hn).symm
all_goals exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
· simp
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases n
all_goals simp
/-! ### Binary -/
theorem digits_two_eq_bits (n : ℕ) : digits 2 n = n.bits.map fun b => cond b 1 0 := by
induction' n using Nat.binaryRecFromOne with b n h ih
· simp
· rfl
rw [bits_append_bit _ _ fun hn => absurd hn h]
cases b
· rw [digits_def' one_lt_two]
· simpa [Nat.bit, Nat.bit0_val n]
· simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero, Nat.bit0_eq_zero]
· simpa [Nat.bit, Nat.bit1_val n, add_comm, digits_add 2 one_lt_two 1 n, Nat.add_mul_div_left]
#align nat.digits_two_eq_bits Nat.digits_two_eq_bits
/-! ### Modular Arithmetic -/
-- This is really a theorem about polynomials.
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 639 | 645 | theorem dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits {α : Type*} [CommRing α] {a b k : α} (h : k ∣ a - b)
(L : List ℕ) : k ∣ ofDigits a L - ofDigits b L := by |
induction' L with d L ih
· change k ∣ 0 - 0
simp
· simp only [ofDigits, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
exact dvd_mul_sub_mul h ih
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Syntax
import Mathlib.Data.List.ProdSigma
#align_import model_theory.semantics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d565b3df44619c1498326936be16f1a935df0728"
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Semantics
This file defines the interpretations of first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories
in a style inspired by the [Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
* `FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize` is defined so that `t.realize v` is the term `t` evaluated at
variables `v`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v xs` is the bounded
formula `φ` evaluated at tuples of variables `v` and `xs`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize v` is the formula `φ`
evaluated at variables `v`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize` is defined so that `φ.Realize M` is the sentence `φ`
evaluated in the structure `M`. Also denoted `M ⊨ φ`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model` is defined so that `T.Model M` is true if and only if every
sentence of `T` is realized in `M`. Also denoted `T ⊨ φ`.
## Main Results
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenex` shows that the prenex normal form of a
formula has the same realization as the original formula.
* Several results in this file show that syntactic constructions such as `relabel`, `castLE`,
`liftAt`, `subst`, and the actions of language maps commute with realization of terms, formulas,
sentences, and theories.
## Implementation Notes
* Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder Cardinal
open Structure Cardinal Fin
namespace Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- A term `t` with variables indexed by `α` can be evaluated by giving a value to each variable. -/
def realize (v : α → M) : ∀ _t : L.Term α, M
| var k => v k
| func f ts => funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v
#align first_order.language.term.realize FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize
/- Porting note: The equation lemma of `realize` is too strong; it simplifies terms like the LHS of
`realize_functions_apply₁`. Even `eqns` can't fix this. We removed `simp` attr from `realize` and
prepare new simp lemmas for `realize`. -/
@[simp]
theorem realize_var (v : α → M) (k) : realize v (var k : L.Term α) = v k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_func (v : α → M) {n} (f : L.Functions n) (ts) :
realize v (func f ts : L.Term α) = funMap f fun i => (ts i).realize v := rfl
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {t : L.Term α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(t.relabel g).realize v = t.realize (v ∘ g) := by
induction' t with _ n f ts ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_relabel
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))} {v : Sum α (Fin (n + n')) → M} :
(t.liftAt n' m).realize v =
t.realize (v ∘ Sum.map id fun i : Fin _ =>
if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') :=
realize_relabel
#align first_order.language.term.realize_lift_at FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_liftAt
@[simp]
theorem realize_constants {c : L.Constants} {v : α → M} : c.term.realize v = c :=
funMap_eq_coe_constants
#align first_order.language.term.realize_constants FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_constants
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₁ {f : L.Functions 1} {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₁ t).realize v = funMap f ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₁, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_functions_apply₁ FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_functions_apply₁
@[simp]
theorem realize_functions_apply₂ {f : L.Functions 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
(f.apply₂ t₁ t₂).realize v = funMap f ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Functions.apply₂, Term.realize]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_functions_apply₂ FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_functions_apply₂
theorem realize_con {A : Set M} {a : A} {v : α → M} : (L.con a).term.realize v = a :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.term.realize_con FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_con
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {t : L.Term α} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} :
(t.subst tf).realize v = t.realize fun a => (tf a).realize v := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_subst FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_subst
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVar [DecidableEq α] {t : L.Term α} {s : Set α} (h : ↑t.varFinset ⊆ s)
{v : α → M} : (t.restrictVar (Set.inclusion h)).realize (v ∘ (↑)) = t.realize v := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp_rw [varFinset, Finset.coe_biUnion, Set.iUnion_subset_iff] at h
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (h i (Finset.mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.realize_restrict_var FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_restrictVar
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} {t : L.Term (Sum α γ)} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑t.varFinsetLeft ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : γ → M} :
(t.restrictVarLeft (Set.inclusion h)).realize (Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
induction' t with a _ _ _ ih
· cases a <;> rfl
· simp_rw [varFinsetLeft, Finset.coe_biUnion, Set.iUnion_subset_iff] at h
exact congr rfl (funext fun i => ih i (h i (Finset.mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.realize_restrict_var_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_restrictVarLeft
@[simp]
theorem realize_constantsToVars [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L[[α]].Term β} {v : β → M} :
t.constantsToVars.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) = t.realize v := by
induction' t with _ n f ts ih
· simp
· cases n
· cases f
· simp only [realize, ih, Nat.zero_eq, constantsOn, mk₂_Functions]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sum_inl]
· simp only [realize, constantsToVars, Sum.elim_inl, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
rfl
· cases' f with _ f
· simp only [realize, ih, constantsOn, mk₂_Functions]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sum_inl]
· exact isEmptyElim f
#align first_order.language.term.realize_constants_to_vars FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_constantsToVars
@[simp]
theorem realize_varsToConstants [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{t : L.Term (Sum α β)} {v : β → M} :
t.varsToConstants.realize v = t.realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) := by
induction' t with ab n f ts ih
· cases' ab with a b
-- Porting note: both cases were `simp [Language.con]`
· simp [Language.con, realize, funMap_eq_coe_constants]
· simp [realize, constantMap]
· simp only [realize, constantsOn, mk₂_Functions, ih]
-- Porting note: below lemma does not work with simp for some reason
rw [withConstants_funMap_sum_inl]
#align first_order.language.term.realize_vars_to_constants FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_varsToConstants
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M] {n} {t : L[[α]].Term (Sum β (Fin n))} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquivLeft t).realize (Sum.elim (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs) =
t.realize (Sum.elim v xs) := by
simp only [constantsVarsEquivLeft, realize_relabel, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply,
constantsVarsEquiv_apply, relabelEquiv_symm_apply]
refine _root_.trans ?_ realize_constantsToVars
rcongr x
rcases x with (a | (b | i)) <;> simp
#align first_order.language.term.realize_constants_vars_equiv_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft
end Term
namespace LHom
@[simp]
theorem realize_onTerm [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (t : L.Term α)
(v : α → M) : (φ.onTerm t).realize v = t.realize v := by
induction' t with _ n f ts ih
· rfl
· simp only [Term.realize, LHom.onTerm, LHom.map_onFunction, ih]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onTerm
end LHom
@[simp]
theorem Hom.realize_term (g : M →[L] N) {t : L.Term α} {v : α → M} :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) := by
induction t
· rfl
· rw [Term.realize, Term.realize, g.map_fun]
refine congr rfl ?_
ext x
simp [*]
#align first_order.language.hom.realize_term FirstOrder.Language.Hom.realize_term
@[simp]
theorem Embedding.realize_term {v : α → M} (t : L.Term α) (g : M ↪[L] N) :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) :=
g.toHom.realize_term
#align first_order.language.embedding.realize_term FirstOrder.Language.Embedding.realize_term
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.realize_term {v : α → M} (t : L.Term α) (g : M ≃[L] N) :
t.realize (g ∘ v) = g (t.realize v) :=
g.toHom.realize_term
#align first_order.language.equiv.realize_term FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.realize_term
variable {n : ℕ}
namespace BoundedFormula
open Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- A bounded formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
def Realize : ∀ {l} (_f : L.BoundedFormula α l) (_v : α → M) (_xs : Fin l → M), Prop
| _, falsum, _v, _xs => False
| _, equal t₁ t₂, v, xs => t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, rel R ts, v, xs => RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs)
| _, imp f₁ f₂, v, xs => Realize f₁ v xs → Realize f₂ v xs
| _, all f, v, xs => ∀ x : M, Realize f v (snoc xs x)
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.Realize
variable {l : ℕ} {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α l} {θ : L.BoundedFormula α l.succ}
variable {v : α → M} {xs : Fin l → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_bot FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_bot
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v xs ↔ ¬φ.Realize v xs :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_not FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_not
@[simp]
theorem realize_bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin l))) :
(t₁.bdEqual t₂).Realize v xs ↔ t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs) = t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_bd_equal FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_bdEqual
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.BoundedFormula α l).Realize v xs ↔ True := by simp [Top.top]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_top FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∧ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp [Inf.inf, Realize]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_inf FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_inf (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_foldr_inf FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs → ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [Realize]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_imp FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_imp
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula ts).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize (Sum.elim v xs) :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_rel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_rel
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₁ t).Realize v xs ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_rel₁ FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_rel₁
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.boundedFormula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v xs ↔
RelMap R ![t₁.realize (Sum.elim v xs), t₂.realize (Sum.elim v xs)] := by
rw [Relations.boundedFormula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_rel₂ FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs ∨ ψ.Realize v xs := by
simp only [realize, Sup.sup, realize_not, eq_iff_iff]
tauto
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_sup FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_foldr_sup (l : List (L.BoundedFormula α n)) (v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) :
(l.foldr (· ⊔ ·) ⊥).Realize v xs ↔ ∃ φ ∈ l, BoundedFormula.Realize φ v xs := by
induction' l with φ l ih
· simp
· simp_rw [List.foldr_cons, realize_sup, ih, List.mem_cons, or_and_right, exists_or,
exists_eq_left]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_foldr_sup FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_all : (all θ).Realize v xs ↔ ∀ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_all FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_all
@[simp]
theorem realize_ex : θ.ex.Realize v xs ↔ ∃ a : M, θ.Realize v (Fin.snoc xs a) := by
rw [BoundedFormula.ex, realize_not, realize_all, not_forall]
simp_rw [realize_not, Classical.not_not]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_ex FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_ex
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs) := by
simp only [BoundedFormula.iff, realize_inf, realize_imp, and_imp, ← iff_def]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_iff FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_iff
theorem realize_castLE_of_eq {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) {h' : m ≤ n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α m}
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.castLE h').Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ cast h) := by
subst h
simp only [castLE_rfl, cast_refl, OrderIso.coe_refl, Function.comp_id]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_cast_le_of_eq FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_castLE_of_eq
theorem realize_mapTermRel_id [L'.Structure M]
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{v' : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M}
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) (xs : Fin n → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs) = t.realize (Sum.elim v xs))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).Realize v' xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
· simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, id]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_map_term_rel_id FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_id
theorem realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe [L'.Structure M] {k : ℕ}
{ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin (k + n)))}
{fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n} {n} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n}
(v : ∀ {n}, (Fin (k + n) → M) → α → M) {v' : β → M} (xs : Fin (k + n) → M)
(h1 :
∀ (n) (t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) (xs' : Fin (k + n) → M),
(ft n t).realize (Sum.elim v' xs') = t.realize (Sum.elim (v xs') (xs' ∘ Fin.natAdd _)))
(h2 : ∀ (n) (R : L.Relations n) (x : Fin n → M), RelMap (fr n R) x = RelMap R x)
(hv : ∀ (n) (xs : Fin (k + n) → M) (x : M), @v (n + 1) (snoc xs x : Fin _ → M) = v xs) :
(φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun n => castLE (add_assoc _ _ _).symm.le).Realize v' xs ↔
φ.Realize (v xs) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd _) := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, h1, h2]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1, ih2]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, ih, hv]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_map_term_rel_add_cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {m n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {g : α → Sum β (Fin m)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (m + n) → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ Fin.castAdd n) ∘ g) (xs ∘ Fin.natAdd m) := by
rw [relabel, realize_mapTermRel_add_castLe] <;> intros <;> simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_relabel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_relabel
theorem realize_liftAt {n n' m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + n') → M}
(hmn : m + n' ≤ n + 1) :
(φ.liftAt n' m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n') := by
rw [liftAt]
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 k _ ih3
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
· simp [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_rel, realize_liftAt, Sum.elim_comp_map]
· simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, ih1 hmn, ih2 hmn]
· have h : k + 1 + n' = k + n' + 1 := by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1 n', ← add_assoc]
simp only [mapTermRel, Realize, realize_castLE_of_eq h, ih3 (hmn.trans k.succ.le_succ)]
refine forall_congr' fun x => iff_eq_eq.mpr (congr rfl (funext (Fin.lastCases ?_ fun i => ?_)))
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, val_last, snoc_last]
by_cases h : k < m
· rw [if_pos h]
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
simp only [coe_cast, coe_castAdd, val_last, self_eq_add_right]
refine le_antisymm
(le_of_add_le_add_left ((hmn.trans (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h)).trans ?_)) n'.zero_le
rw [add_zero]
· rw [if_neg h]
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).trans (snoc_last _ _)
simp
· simp only [Function.comp_apply, Fin.snoc_castSucc]
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).trans (snoc_castSucc _ _ _)
simp only [coe_castSucc, coe_cast]
split_ifs <;> simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_lift_at FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_liftAt
theorem realize_liftAt_one {n m : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} {xs : Fin (n + 1) → M}
(hmn : m ≤ n) :
(φ.liftAt 1 m).Realize v xs ↔
φ.Realize v (xs ∘ fun i => if ↑i < m then castSucc i else i.succ) := by
simp [realize_liftAt (add_le_add_right hmn 1), castSucc]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_lift_at_one FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_liftAt_one
@[simp]
theorem realize_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin (n + 1) → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v (xs ∘ castSucc) := by
rw [realize_liftAt_one (refl n), iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_))
rw [if_pos i.is_lt]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_lift_at_one_self FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_liftAt_one_self
@[simp]
theorem realize_subst {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {tf : α → L.Term β} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.subst tf).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (fun a => (tf a).realize v) xs :=
realize_mapTermRel_id
(fun n t x => by
rw [Term.realize_subst]
rcongr a
cases a
· simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Function.comp_apply, Term.realize_relabel, Sum.elim_comp_inl]
· rfl)
(by simp)
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_subst FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_subst
@[simp]
theorem realize_restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {s : Set α}
(h : ↑φ.freeVarFinset ⊆ s) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.restrictFreeVar (Set.inclusion h)).Realize (v ∘ (↑)) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize]
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize, ih1, ih2]
· simp [restrictFreeVar, Realize, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_restrict_free_var FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar
theorem realize_constantsVarsEquiv [L[[α]].Structure M] [(lhomWithConstants L α).IsExpansionOn M]
{n} {φ : L[[α]].BoundedFormula β n} {v : β → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(constantsVarsEquiv φ).Realize (Sum.elim (fun a => ↑(L.con a)) v) xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => realize_constantsVarsEquivLeft) fun n R xs => ?_
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← (lhomWithConstants L α).map_onRelation
(Equiv.sumEmpty (L.Relations n) ((constantsOn α).Relations n) R) xs]
rcongr
cases' R with R R
· simp
· exact isEmptyElim R
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_constants_vars_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_constantsVarsEquiv
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabelEquiv {g : α ≃ β} {k} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α k} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin k → M} : (relabelEquiv g φ).Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) xs := by
simp only [relabelEquiv, mapTermRelEquiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl]
refine realize_mapTermRel_id (fun n t xs => ?_) fun _ _ _ => rfl
simp only [relabelEquiv_apply, Term.realize_relabel]
refine congr (congr rfl ?_) rfl
ext (i | i) <;> rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_relabel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_relabelEquiv
variable [Nonempty M]
theorem realize_all_liftAt_one_self {n : ℕ} {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.liftAt 1 n).all.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
inhabit M
simp only [realize_all, realize_liftAt_one_self]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h a => ?_⟩
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp (h default)
simp
· refine (congr rfl (funext fun i => ?_)).mp h
simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_all_lift_at_one_self FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_all_liftAt_one_self
theorem realize_toPrenexImpRight {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n} (hφ : IsQF φ) (hψ : IsPrenex ψ)
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.toPrenexImpRight ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs := by
induction' hψ with _ _ hψ _ _ _hψ ih _ _ _hψ ih
· rw [hψ.toPrenexImpRight]
· refine _root_.trans (forall_congr' fun _ => ih hφ.liftAt) ?_
simp only [realize_imp, realize_liftAt_one_self, snoc_comp_castSucc, realize_all]
exact ⟨fun h1 a h2 => h1 h2 a, fun h1 h2 a => h1 a h2⟩
· unfold toPrenexImpRight
rw [realize_ex]
refine _root_.trans (exists_congr fun _ => ih hφ.liftAt) ?_
simp only [realize_imp, realize_liftAt_one_self, snoc_comp_castSucc, realize_ex]
refine ⟨?_, fun h' => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ h
exact ⟨a, ha h⟩
· by_cases h : φ.Realize v xs
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := h' h
exact ⟨a, fun _ => ha⟩
· inhabit M
exact ⟨default, fun h'' => (h h'').elim⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_prenex_imp_right FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenexImpRight
theorem realize_toPrenexImp {φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n} (hφ : IsPrenex φ) (hψ : IsPrenex ψ)
{v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} : (φ.toPrenexImp ψ).Realize v xs ↔ (φ.imp ψ).Realize v xs := by
revert ψ
induction' hφ with _ _ hφ _ _ _hφ ih _ _ _hφ ih <;> intro ψ hψ
· rw [hφ.toPrenexImp]
exact realize_toPrenexImpRight hφ hψ
· unfold toPrenexImp
rw [realize_ex]
refine _root_.trans (exists_congr fun _ => ih hψ.liftAt) ?_
simp only [realize_imp, realize_liftAt_one_self, snoc_comp_castSucc, realize_all]
refine ⟨?_, fun h' => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ h
exact ha (h a)
· by_cases h : ψ.Realize v xs
· inhabit M
exact ⟨default, fun _h'' => h⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := not_forall.1 (h ∘ h')
exact ⟨a, fun h => (ha h).elim⟩
· refine _root_.trans (forall_congr' fun _ => ih hψ.liftAt) ?_
simp
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_prenex_imp FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenexImp
@[simp]
theorem realize_toPrenex (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} :
∀ {xs : Fin n → M}, φ.toPrenex.Realize v xs ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f1 f2 h1 h2 _ _ h
· exact Iff.rfl
· exact Iff.rfl
· exact Iff.rfl
· intros
rw [toPrenex, realize_toPrenexImp f1.toPrenex_isPrenex f2.toPrenex_isPrenex, realize_imp,
realize_imp, h1, h2]
· intros
rw [realize_all, toPrenex, realize_all]
exact forall_congr' fun a => h
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_prenex FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toPrenex
end BoundedFormula
-- Porting note: no `protected` attribute in Lean4
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.falsum bounded_formula.equal bounded_formula.rel
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.imp bounded_formula.all
namespace LHom
open BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_onBoundedFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] {n : ℕ}
(ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M} {xs : Fin n → M} :
(φ.onBoundedFormula ψ).Realize v xs ↔ ψ.Realize v xs := by
induction' ψ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_bdEqual, realize_onTerm]
rfl
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, realize_rel, LHom.map_onRelation,
Function.comp_apply, realize_onTerm]
rfl
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih1, ih2, realize_imp]
· simp only [onBoundedFormula, ih3, realize_all]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onBoundedFormula
end LHom
-- Porting note: no `protected` attribute in Lean4
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.falsum bounded_formula.equal bounded_formula.rel
-- attribute [protected] bounded_formula.imp bounded_formula.all
namespace Formula
/-- A formula can be evaluated as true or false by giving values to each free variable. -/
nonrec def Realize (φ : L.Formula α) (v : α → M) : Prop :=
φ.Realize v default
#align first_order.language.formula.realize FirstOrder.Language.Formula.Realize
variable {φ ψ : L.Formula α} {v : α → M}
@[simp]
theorem realize_not : φ.not.Realize v ↔ ¬φ.Realize v :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_not FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_not
@[simp]
theorem realize_bot : (⊥ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_bot FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_bot
@[simp]
theorem realize_top : (⊤ : L.Formula α).Realize v ↔ True :=
BoundedFormula.realize_top
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_top FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_top
@[simp]
theorem realize_inf : (φ ⊓ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∧ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_inf
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_inf FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_inf
@[simp]
theorem realize_imp : (φ.imp ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v → ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_imp
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_imp FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_imp
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel {k : ℕ} {R : L.Relations k} {ts : Fin k → L.Term α} :
(R.formula ts).Realize v ↔ RelMap R fun i => (ts i).realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_rel.trans (by simp)
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_rel FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_rel
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₁ {R : L.Relations 1} {t : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₁ t).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₁, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext fun _ => ?_)
simp only [Matrix.cons_val_fin_one]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_rel₁ FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_rel₁
@[simp]
theorem realize_rel₂ {R : L.Relations 2} {t₁ t₂ : L.Term _} :
(R.formula₂ t₁ t₂).Realize v ↔ RelMap R ![t₁.realize v, t₂.realize v] := by
rw [Relations.formula₂, realize_rel, iff_eq_eq]
refine congr rfl (funext (Fin.cases ?_ ?_))
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_zero]
· simp only [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, forall_const]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_rel₂ FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_rel₂
@[simp]
theorem realize_sup : (φ ⊔ ψ).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize v ∨ ψ.Realize v :=
BoundedFormula.realize_sup
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_sup FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_sup
@[simp]
theorem realize_iff : (φ.iff ψ).Realize v ↔ (φ.Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v) :=
BoundedFormula.realize_iff
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_iff FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iff
@[simp]
theorem realize_relabel {φ : L.Formula α} {g : α → β} {v : β → M} :
(φ.relabel g).Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ g) := by
rw [Realize, Realize, relabel, BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, iff_eq_eq, Fin.castAdd_zero]
exact congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_relabel
theorem realize_relabel_sum_inr (φ : L.Formula (Fin n)) {v : Empty → M} {x : Fin n → M} :
(BoundedFormula.relabel Sum.inr φ).Realize v x ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, Sum.elim_comp_inr, Fin.castAdd_zero,
cast_refl, Function.comp_id,
Subsingleton.elim (x ∘ (natAdd n : Fin 0 → Fin n)) default]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_relabel_sum_inr FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_relabel_sum_inr
@[simp]
theorem realize_equal {t₁ t₂ : L.Term α} {x : α → M} :
(t₁.equal t₂).Realize x ↔ t₁.realize x = t₂.realize x := by simp [Term.equal, Realize]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equal FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equal
@[simp]
theorem realize_graph {f : L.Functions n} {x : Fin n → M} {y : M} :
(Formula.graph f).Realize (Fin.cons y x : _ → M) ↔ funMap f x = y := by
simp only [Formula.graph, Term.realize, realize_equal, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ]
rw [eq_comm]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_graph FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_graph
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (ψ : L.Formula α)
{v : α → M} : (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize v ↔ ψ.Realize v :=
φ.realize_onBoundedFormula ψ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_formula FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onFormula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.setOf_realize_onFormula [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Formula α) : (setOf (φ.onFormula ψ).Realize : Set (α → M)) = setOf ψ.Realize := by
ext
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.set_of_realize_on_formula FirstOrder.Language.LHom.setOf_realize_onFormula
variable (M)
/-- A sentence can be evaluated as true or false in a structure. -/
nonrec def Sentence.Realize (φ : L.Sentence) : Prop :=
φ.Realize (default : _ → M)
#align first_order.language.sentence.realize FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.Realize
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Sentence.Realize]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Sentence.Realize
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_not {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ φ.not ↔ ¬M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.sentence.realize_not FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.realize_not
namespace Formula
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm_con [L[[α]].Structure M]
[(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M] (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) :
((equivSentence.symm φ).Realize fun a => (L.con a : M)) ↔ φ.Realize M := by
simp only [equivSentence, _root_.Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.coe_trans, Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_relabelEquiv, Function.comp]
refine _root_.trans ?_ BoundedFormula.realize_constantsVarsEquiv
rw [iff_iff_eq]
congr with (_ | a)
· simp
· cases a
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equiv_sentence_symm_con FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equivSentence_symm_con
@[simp]
theorem realize_equivSentence [L[[α]].Structure M] [(L.lhomWithConstants α).IsExpansionOn M]
(φ : L.Formula α) : (equivSentence φ).Realize M ↔ φ.Realize fun a => (L.con a : M) := by
rw [← realize_equivSentence_symm_con M (equivSentence φ), _root_.Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equiv_sentence FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equivSentence
theorem realize_equivSentence_symm (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) (v : α → M) :
(equivSentence.symm φ).Realize v ↔
@Sentence.Realize _ M (@Language.withConstantsStructure L M _ α (constantsOn.structure v))
φ :=
letI := constantsOn.structure v
realize_equivSentence_symm_con M φ
#align first_order.language.formula.realize_equiv_sentence_symm FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_equivSentence_symm
end Formula
@[simp]
theorem LHom.realize_onSentence [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M]
(ψ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ.onSentence ψ ↔ M ⊨ ψ :=
φ.realize_onFormula ψ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.realize_on_sentence FirstOrder.Language.LHom.realize_onSentence
variable (L)
/-- The complete theory of a structure `M` is the set of all sentences `M` satisfies. -/
def completeTheory : L.Theory :=
{ φ | M ⊨ φ }
#align first_order.language.complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.completeTheory
variable (N)
/-- Two structures are elementarily equivalent when they satisfy the same sentences. -/
def ElementarilyEquivalent : Prop :=
L.completeTheory M = L.completeTheory N
#align first_order.language.elementarily_equivalent FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent]
scoped[FirstOrder]
notation:25 A " ≅[" L "] " B:50 => FirstOrder.Language.ElementarilyEquivalent L A B
variable {L} {M} {N}
@[simp]
theorem mem_completeTheory {φ : Sentence L} : φ ∈ L.completeTheory M ↔ M ⊨ φ :=
Iff.rfl
#align first_order.language.mem_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.mem_completeTheory
theorem elementarilyEquivalent_iff : M ≅[L] N ↔ ∀ φ : L.Sentence, M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
simp only [ElementarilyEquivalent, Set.ext_iff, completeTheory, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align first_order.language.elementarily_equivalent_iff FirstOrder.Language.elementarilyEquivalent_iff
variable (M)
/-- A model of a theory is a structure in which every sentence is realized as true. -/
class Theory.Model (T : L.Theory) : Prop where
realize_of_mem : ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model
-- input using \|= or \vDash, but not using \models
@[inherit_doc Theory.Model]
infixl:51 " ⊨ " => Theory.Model
variable {M} (T : L.Theory)
@[simp default-10]
theorem Theory.model_iff : M ⊨ T ↔ ∀ φ ∈ T, M ⊨ φ :=
⟨fun h => h.realize_of_mem, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_iff
theorem Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem [M ⊨ T] {φ : L.Sentence} (h : φ ∈ T) : M ⊨ φ :=
Theory.Model.realize_of_mem φ h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem FirstOrder.Language.Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem LHom.onTheory_model [L'.Structure M] (φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] (T : L.Theory) :
M ⊨ φ.onTheory T ↔ M ⊨ T := by simp [Theory.model_iff, LHom.onTheory]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lhom.on_Theory_model FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onTheory_model
variable {T}
instance model_empty : M ⊨ (∅ : L.Theory) :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (Set.not_mem_empty φ hφ).elim⟩
#align first_order.language.model_empty FirstOrder.Language.model_empty
namespace Theory
theorem Model.mono {T' : L.Theory} (_h : M ⊨ T') (hs : T ⊆ T') : M ⊨ T :=
⟨fun _φ hφ => T'.realize_sentence_of_mem (hs hφ)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model.mono FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model.mono
theorem Model.union {T' : L.Theory} (h : M ⊨ T) (h' : M ⊨ T') : M ⊨ T ∪ T' := by
simp only [model_iff, Set.mem_union] at *
exact fun φ hφ => hφ.elim (h _) (h' _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model.union FirstOrder.Language.Theory.Model.union
@[simp]
theorem model_union_iff {T' : L.Theory} : M ⊨ T ∪ T' ↔ M ⊨ T ∧ M ⊨ T' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono Set.subset_union_left, h.mono Set.subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_union_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_union_iff
theorem model_singleton_iff {φ : L.Sentence} : M ⊨ ({φ} : L.Theory) ↔ M ⊨ φ := by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_singleton_iff FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_singleton_iff
theorem model_iff_subset_completeTheory : M ⊨ T ↔ T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
T.model_iff
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.model_iff_subset_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory
theorem completeTheory.subset [MT : M ⊨ T] : T ⊆ L.completeTheory M :=
model_iff_subset_completeTheory.1 MT
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory.complete_theory.subset FirstOrder.Language.Theory.completeTheory.subset
end Theory
instance model_completeTheory : M ⊨ L.completeTheory M :=
Theory.model_iff_subset_completeTheory.2 (subset_refl _)
#align first_order.language.model_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.model_completeTheory
variable (M N)
theorem realize_iff_of_model_completeTheory [N ⊨ L.completeTheory M] (φ : L.Sentence) :
N ⊨ φ ↔ M ⊨ φ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem⟩
contrapose! h
rw [← Sentence.realize_not] at *
exact (L.completeTheory M).realize_sentence_of_mem (mem_completeTheory.2 h)
#align first_order.language.realize_iff_of_model_complete_theory FirstOrder.Language.realize_iff_of_model_completeTheory
variable {M N}
namespace BoundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_alls {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.alls.Realize v ↔ ∀ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.forall_iff.symm
· simp only [alls, ih, Realize]
exact ⟨fun h xs => Fin.snoc_init_self xs ▸ h _ _, fun h xs x => h (Fin.snoc xs x)⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_alls FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_alls
@[simp]
theorem realize_exs {φ : L.BoundedFormula α n} {v : α → M} :
φ.exs.Realize v ↔ ∃ xs : Fin n → M, φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' n with n ih
· exact Unique.exists_iff.symm
· simp only [BoundedFormula.exs, ih, realize_ex]
constructor
· rintro ⟨xs, x, h⟩
exact ⟨_, h⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
rw [← Fin.snoc_init_self xs] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_exs FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_exs
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iAlls
[Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} : (φ.iAlls f).Realize v ↔
∀ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin γ))
rw [Formula.iAlls]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_alls, realize_relabel, Function.comp,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
refine Equiv.forall_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iAlls [Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iAlls f) v v' ↔
∀ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iAlls, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.FirstOrder.Language.Formula.realize_iExs
[Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} : (φ.iExs f).Realize v ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
let e := Classical.choice (Classical.choose_spec (Finite.exists_equiv_fin γ))
rw [Formula.iExs]
simp only [Nat.add_zero, realize_exs, realize_relabel, Function.comp,
castAdd_zero, finCongr_refl, OrderIso.refl_apply, Sum.elim_map, id_eq]
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_exists]
refine Equiv.forall_congr ?_ ?_
· exact ⟨fun v => v ∘ e, fun v => v ∘ e.symm,
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp],
fun _ => by simp [Function.comp]⟩
· intro x
rw [Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
congr
funext i
exact i.elim0
@[simp]
theorem realize_iExs [Finite γ] {f : α → β ⊕ γ}
{φ : L.Formula α} {v : β → M} {v' : Fin 0 → M} :
BoundedFormula.Realize (φ.iExs f) v v' ↔
∃ (i : γ → M), φ.Realize (fun a => Sum.elim v i (f a)) := by
rw [← Formula.realize_iExs, iff_iff_eq]; congr; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[simp]
theorem realize_toFormula (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (v : Sum α (Fin n) → M) :
φ.toFormula.Realize v ↔ φ.Realize (v ∘ Sum.inl) (v ∘ Sum.inr) := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3 a8 a9 a0
· rfl
· simp [BoundedFormula.Realize]
· simp [BoundedFormula.Realize]
· rw [toFormula, Formula.Realize, realize_imp, ← Formula.Realize, ih1, ← Formula.Realize, ih2,
realize_imp]
· rw [toFormula, Formula.Realize, realize_all, realize_all]
refine forall_congr' fun a => ?_
have h := ih3 (Sum.elim (v ∘ Sum.inl) (snoc (v ∘ Sum.inr) a))
simp only [Sum.elim_comp_inl, Sum.elim_comp_inr] at h
rw [← h, realize_relabel, Formula.Realize, iff_iff_eq]
simp only [Function.comp]
congr with x
· cases' x with _ x
· simp
· refine Fin.lastCases ?_ ?_ x
· rw [Sum.elim_inr, Sum.elim_inr,
finSumFinEquiv_symm_last, Sum.map_inr, Sum.elim_inr]
simp [Fin.snoc]
· simp only [castSucc, Function.comp_apply, Sum.elim_inr,
finSumFinEquiv_symm_apply_castAdd, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
rw [← castSucc]
simp
· exact Fin.elim0 x
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.realize_to_formula FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.realize_toFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_iSup (s : Finset β) (f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n)
(v : α → M) (v' : Fin n → M) :
(iSup s f).Realize v v' ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, (f b).Realize v v' := by
simp only [iSup, realize_foldr_sup, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_toList,
exists_exists_and_eq_and]
@[simp]
theorem realize_iInf (s : Finset β) (f : β → L.BoundedFormula α n)
(v : α → M) (v' : Fin n → M) :
(iInf s f).Realize v v' ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, (f b).Realize v v' := by
simp only [iInf, realize_foldr_inf, List.mem_map, Finset.mem_toList,
forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
end BoundedFormula
namespace Equiv
@[simp]
theorem realize_boundedFormula (g : M ≃[L] N) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) {v : α → M}
{xs : Fin n → M} : φ.Realize (g ∘ v) (g ∘ xs) ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ← Sum.comp_elim, Equiv.realize_term, g.injective.eq_iff]
· simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ← Sum.comp_elim, Equiv.realize_term]
exact g.map_rel _ _
· rw [BoundedFormula.Realize, ih1, ih2, BoundedFormula.Realize]
· rw [BoundedFormula.Realize, BoundedFormula.Realize]
constructor
· intro h a
have h' := h (g a)
rw [← Fin.comp_snoc, ih3] at h'
exact h'
· intro h a
have h' := h (g.symm a)
rw [← ih3, Fin.comp_snoc, g.apply_symm_apply] at h'
exact h'
#align first_order.language.equiv.realize_bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.realize_boundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem realize_formula (g : M ≃[L] N) (φ : L.Formula α) {v : α → M} :
φ.Realize (g ∘ v) ↔ φ.Realize v := by
rw [Formula.Realize, Formula.Realize, ← g.realize_boundedFormula φ, iff_eq_eq,
Unique.eq_default (g ∘ default)]
#align first_order.language.equiv.realize_formula FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.realize_formula
theorem realize_sentence (g : M ≃[L] N) (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
rw [Sentence.Realize, Sentence.Realize, ← g.realize_formula, Unique.eq_default (g ∘ default)]
#align first_order.language.equiv.realize_sentence FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.realize_sentence
theorem theory_model (g : M ≃[L] N) [M ⊨ T] : N ⊨ T :=
⟨fun φ hφ => (g.realize_sentence φ).1 (Theory.realize_sentence_of_mem T hφ)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.equiv.Theory_model FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.theory_model
theorem elementarilyEquivalent (g : M ≃[L] N) : M ≅[L] N :=
elementarilyEquivalent_iff.2 g.realize_sentence
#align first_order.language.equiv.elementarily_equivalent FirstOrder.Language.Equiv.elementarilyEquivalent
end Equiv
namespace Relations
open BoundedFormula
variable {r : L.Relations 2}
@[simp]
theorem realize_reflexive : M ⊨ r.reflexive ↔ Reflexive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => realize_rel₂
#align first_order.language.relations.realize_reflexive FirstOrder.Language.Relations.realize_reflexive
@[simp]
theorem realize_irreflexive : M ⊨ r.irreflexive ↔ Irreflexive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_congr realize_rel₂
#align first_order.language.relations.realize_irreflexive FirstOrder.Language.Relations.realize_irreflexive
@[simp]
theorem realize_symmetric : M ⊨ r.symmetric ↔ Symmetric fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ => forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂
#align first_order.language.relations.realize_symmetric FirstOrder.Language.Relations.realize_symmetric
@[simp]
theorem realize_antisymmetric :
M ⊨ r.antisymmetric ↔ AntiSymmetric fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ (imp_congr realize_rel₂ Iff.rfl)
#align first_order.language.relations.realize_antisymmetric FirstOrder.Language.Relations.realize_antisymmetric
@[simp]
theorem realize_transitive : M ⊨ r.transitive ↔ Transitive fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr realize_rel₂ (imp_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂)
#align first_order.language.relations.realize_transitive FirstOrder.Language.Relations.realize_transitive
@[simp]
theorem realize_total : M ⊨ r.total ↔ Total fun x y : M => RelMap r ![x, y] :=
forall_congr' fun _ =>
forall_congr' fun _ => realize_sup.trans (or_congr realize_rel₂ realize_rel₂)
#align first_order.language.relations.realize_total FirstOrder.Language.Relations.realize_total
end Relations
section Cardinality
variable (L)
@[simp]
theorem Sentence.realize_cardGe (n) : M ⊨ Sentence.cardGe L n ↔ ↑n ≤ #M := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_le.{0}, lift_lift, lift_mk_le, Sentence.cardGe, Sentence.Realize,
BoundedFormula.realize_exs]
simp_rw [BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_inf]
simp only [Function.comp_apply, List.mem_map, Prod.exists, Ne, List.mem_product,
List.mem_finRange, forall_exists_index, and_imp, List.mem_filter, true_and_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun xs => ⟨xs.some, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨xs, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨xs, fun i j ij => ?_⟩⟩
contrapose! ij
have hij := h _ i j (by simpa using ij) rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.realize_not, Term.realize, BoundedFormula.realize_bdEqual,
Sum.elim_inr] at hij
exact hij
· rintro _ i j ij rfl
simpa using ij
#align first_order.language.sentence.realize_card_ge FirstOrder.Language.Sentence.realize_cardGe
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Semantics.lean | 1,119 | 1,120 | theorem model_infiniteTheory_iff : M ⊨ L.infiniteTheory ↔ Infinite M := by |
simp [infiniteTheory, infinite_iff, aleph0_le]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.strict from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84dc0bd6619acaea625086d6f53cb35cdd554219"
/-!
# Strictly convex sets
This file defines strictly convex sets.
A set is strictly convex if the open segment between any two distinct points lies in its interior.
-/
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 𝕝 E F β : Type*}
open Function Set
open Convex
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜)
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (s : Set E)
/-- A set is strictly convex if the open segment between any two distinct points lies is in its
interior. This basically means "convex and not flat on the boundary". -/
def StrictConvex : Prop :=
s.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ interior s
#align strict_convex StrictConvex
variable {𝕜 s}
variable {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜}
theorem strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s ↔ s.Pairwise fun x y => openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => (openSegment_subset_iff 𝕜).symm
#align strict_convex_iff_open_segment_subset strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset
theorem StrictConvex.openSegment_subset (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(h : x ≠ y) : openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s :=
strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset.1 hs hx hy h
#align strict_convex.open_segment_subset StrictConvex.openSegment_subset
theorem strictConvex_empty : StrictConvex 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) :=
pairwise_empty _
#align strict_convex_empty strictConvex_empty
theorem strictConvex_univ : StrictConvex 𝕜 (univ : Set E) := by
intro x _ y _ _ a b _ _ _
rw [interior_univ]
exact mem_univ _
#align strict_convex_univ strictConvex_univ
protected nonrec theorem StrictConvex.eq (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (h : a • x + b • y ∉ interior s) : x = y :=
hs.eq hx hy fun H => h <| H ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.eq StrictConvex.eq
protected theorem StrictConvex.inter {t : Set E} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (ht : StrictConvex 𝕜 t) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (s ∩ t) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
rw [interior_inter]
exact ⟨hs hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab, ht hx.2 hy.2 hxy ha hb hab⟩
#align strict_convex.inter StrictConvex.inter
theorem Directed.strictConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(hs : ∀ ⦃i : ι⦄, StrictConvex 𝕜 (s i)) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hx hy
obtain ⟨i, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨j, hy⟩ := hy
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hdir i j
exact interior_mono (subset_iUnion s k) (hs (hik hx) (hjk hy) hxy ha hb hab)
#align directed.strict_convex_Union Directed.strictConvex_iUnion
theorem DirectedOn.strictConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hdir : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StrictConvex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact (directedOn_iff_directed.1 hdir).strictConvex_iUnion fun s => hS _ s.2
#align directed_on.strict_convex_sUnion DirectedOn.strictConvex_sUnion
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {s : Set E}
protected theorem StrictConvex.convex (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
interior_subset <| hs hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.convex StrictConvex.convex
/-- An open convex set is strictly convex. -/
protected theorem Convex.strictConvex_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s :=
fun _ hx _ hy _ _ _ ha hb hab => h.interior_eq.symm ▸ hs hx hy ha.le hb.le hab
#align convex.strict_convex_of_open Convex.strictConvex_of_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.strictConvex_iff (h : IsOpen s) : StrictConvex 𝕜 s ↔ Convex 𝕜 s :=
⟨StrictConvex.convex, Convex.strictConvex_of_isOpen h⟩
#align is_open.strict_convex_iff IsOpen.strictConvex_iff
theorem strictConvex_singleton (c : E) : StrictConvex 𝕜 ({c} : Set E) :=
pairwise_singleton _ _
#align strict_convex_singleton strictConvex_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.strictConvex (hs : s.Subsingleton) : StrictConvex 𝕜 s :=
hs.pairwise _
#align set.subsingleton.strict_convex Set.Subsingleton.strictConvex
theorem StrictConvex.linear_image [Semiring 𝕝] [Module 𝕝 E] [Module 𝕝 F]
[LinearMap.CompatibleSMul E F 𝕜 𝕝] (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕝] F) (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ hxy a b ha hb hab
refine hf.image_interior_subset _ ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hx hy (ne_of_apply_ne _ hxy) ha hb hab, ?_⟩
rw [map_add, f.map_smul_of_tower a, f.map_smul_of_tower b]
#align strict_convex.linear_image StrictConvex.linear_image
theorem StrictConvex.is_linear_image (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F} (h : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f)
(hf : IsOpenMap f) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image (h.mk' f) hf
#align strict_convex.is_linear_image StrictConvex.is_linear_image
theorem StrictConvex.linear_preimage {s : Set F} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : Continuous f) (hfinj : Injective f) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (s.preimage f) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
refine preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hf ?_
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]
exact hs hx hy (hfinj.ne hxy) ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.linear_preimage StrictConvex.linear_preimage
theorem StrictConvex.is_linear_preimage {s : Set F} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F}
(h : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) (hf : Continuous f) (hfinj : Injective f) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (s.preimage f) :=
hs.linear_preimage (h.mk' f) hf hfinj
#align strict_convex.is_linear_preimage StrictConvex.is_linear_preimage
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid β] [OrderTopology β] [Module 𝕜 β]
[OrderedSMul 𝕜 β]
protected theorem Set.OrdConnected.strictConvex {s : Set β} (hs : OrdConnected s) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s := by
refine strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset.2 fun x hx y hy hxy => ?_
cases' hxy.lt_or_lt with hlt hlt <;> [skip; rw [openSegment_symm]] <;>
exact
(openSegment_subset_Ioo hlt).trans
(isOpen_Ioo.subset_interior_iff.2 <| Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans <| hs.out ‹_› ‹_›)
#align set.ord_connected.strict_convex Set.OrdConnected.strictConvex
theorem strictConvex_Iic (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Iic r) :=
ordConnected_Iic.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Iic strictConvex_Iic
theorem strictConvex_Ici (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ici r) :=
ordConnected_Ici.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ici strictConvex_Ici
theorem strictConvex_Iio (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Iio r) :=
ordConnected_Iio.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Iio strictConvex_Iio
theorem strictConvex_Ioi (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ioi r) :=
ordConnected_Ioi.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ioi strictConvex_Ioi
theorem strictConvex_Icc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Icc r s) :=
ordConnected_Icc.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Icc strictConvex_Icc
theorem strictConvex_Ioo (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ioo r s) :=
ordConnected_Ioo.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ioo strictConvex_Ioo
theorem strictConvex_Ico (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ico r s) :=
ordConnected_Ico.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ico strictConvex_Ico
theorem strictConvex_Ioc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ioc r s) :=
ordConnected_Ioc.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ioc strictConvex_Ioc
theorem strictConvex_uIcc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (uIcc r s) :=
strictConvex_Icc _ _
#align strict_convex_uIcc strictConvex_uIcc
theorem strictConvex_uIoc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (uIoc r s) :=
strictConvex_Ioc _ _
#align strict_convex_uIoc strictConvex_uIoc
end LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
end Module
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCancelCommMonoid
variable [AddCancelCommMonoid E] [ContinuousAdd E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E}
/-- The translation of a strictly convex set is also strictly convex. -/
theorem StrictConvex.preimage_add_right (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (z : E) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 ((fun x => z + x) ⁻¹' s) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
refine preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage (continuous_add_left _) ?_
have h := hs hx hy ((add_right_injective _).ne hxy) ha hb hab
rwa [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, ← _root_.add_smul, hab, one_smul] at h
#align strict_convex.preimage_add_right StrictConvex.preimage_add_right
/-- The translation of a strictly convex set is also strictly convex. -/
theorem StrictConvex.preimage_add_left (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (z : E) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 ((fun x => x + z) ⁻¹' s) := by
simpa only [add_comm] using hs.preimage_add_right z
#align strict_convex.preimage_add_left StrictConvex.preimage_add_left
end AddCancelCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
section continuous_add
variable [ContinuousAdd E] {s t : Set E}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Strict.lean | 246 | 258 | theorem StrictConvex.add (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (ht : StrictConvex 𝕜 t) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (s + t) := by |
rintro _ ⟨v, hv, w, hw, rfl⟩ _ ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩ h a b ha hb hab
rw [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm]
obtain rfl | hvx := eq_or_ne v x
· refine interior_mono (add_subset_add (singleton_subset_iff.2 hv) Subset.rfl) ?_
rw [Convex.combo_self hab, singleton_add]
exact
(isOpenMap_add_left _).image_interior_subset _
(mem_image_of_mem _ <| ht hw hy (ne_of_apply_ne _ h) ha hb hab)
exact
subset_interior_add_left
(add_mem_add (hs hv hx hvx ha hb hab) <| ht.convex hw hy ha.le hb.le hab)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RieszLemma
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Module
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
#align_import analysis.normed_space.finite_dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9425b6f8220e53b059f5a4904786c3c4b50fc057"
/-!
# Finite dimensional normed spaces over complete fields
Over a complete nontrivially normed field, in finite dimension, all norms are equivalent and all
linear maps are continuous. Moreover, a finite-dimensional subspace is always complete and closed.
## Main results:
* `FiniteDimensional.complete` : a finite-dimensional space over a complete field is complete. This
is not registered as an instance, as the field would be an unknown metavariable in typeclass
resolution.
* `Submodule.closed_of_finiteDimensional` : a finite-dimensional subspace over a complete field is
closed
* `FiniteDimensional.proper` : a finite-dimensional space over a proper field is proper. This
is not registered as an instance, as the field would be an unknown metavariable in typeclass
resolution. It is however registered as an instance for `𝕜 = ℝ` and `𝕜 = ℂ`. As properness
implies completeness, there is no need to also register `FiniteDimensional.complete` on `ℝ` or
`ℂ`.
* `FiniteDimensional.of_isCompact_closedBall`: Riesz' theorem: if the closed unit ball is
compact, then the space is finite-dimensional.
## Implementation notes
The fact that all norms are equivalent is not written explicitly, as it would mean having two norms
on a single space, which is not the way type classes work. However, if one has a
finite-dimensional vector space `E` with a norm, and a copy `E'` of this type with another norm,
then the identities from `E` to `E'` and from `E'`to `E` are continuous thanks to
`LinearMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional`. This gives the desired norm equivalence.
-/
universe u v w x
noncomputable section
open Set FiniteDimensional TopologicalSpace Filter Asymptotics Classical Topology
NNReal Metric
namespace LinearIsometry
open LinearMap
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {F E₁ : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup E₁] [Module R E₁]
variable {R₁ : Type*} [Field R₁] [Module R₁ E₁] [Module R₁ F] [FiniteDimensional R₁ E₁]
[FiniteDimensional R₁ F]
/-- A linear isometry between finite dimensional spaces of equal dimension can be upgraded
to a linear isometry equivalence. -/
def toLinearIsometryEquiv (li : E₁ →ₗᵢ[R₁] F) (h : finrank R₁ E₁ = finrank R₁ F) :
E₁ ≃ₗᵢ[R₁] F where
toLinearEquiv := li.toLinearMap.linearEquivOfInjective li.injective h
norm_map' := li.norm_map'
#align linear_isometry.to_linear_isometry_equiv LinearIsometry.toLinearIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toLinearIsometryEquiv (li : E₁ →ₗᵢ[R₁] F) (h : finrank R₁ E₁ = finrank R₁ F) :
(li.toLinearIsometryEquiv h : E₁ → F) = li :=
rfl
#align linear_isometry.coe_to_linear_isometry_equiv LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem toLinearIsometryEquiv_apply (li : E₁ →ₗᵢ[R₁] F) (h : finrank R₁ E₁ = finrank R₁ F)
(x : E₁) : (li.toLinearIsometryEquiv h) x = li x :=
rfl
#align linear_isometry.to_linear_isometry_equiv_apply LinearIsometry.toLinearIsometryEquiv_apply
end LinearIsometry
namespace AffineIsometry
open AffineMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {V₁ V₂ : Type*} {P₁ P₂ : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup V₁]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup V₂] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V₁] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V₂] [MetricSpace P₁]
[PseudoMetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₁ P₁] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
variable [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 V₁] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 V₂]
/-- An affine isometry between finite dimensional spaces of equal dimension can be upgraded
to an affine isometry equivalence. -/
def toAffineIsometryEquiv [Inhabited P₁] (li : P₁ →ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂) (h : finrank 𝕜 V₁ = finrank 𝕜 V₂) :
P₁ ≃ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂ :=
AffineIsometryEquiv.mk' li (li.linearIsometry.toLinearIsometryEquiv h)
(Inhabited.default (α := P₁)) fun p => by simp
#align affine_isometry.to_affine_isometry_equiv AffineIsometry.toAffineIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toAffineIsometryEquiv [Inhabited P₁] (li : P₁ →ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂)
(h : finrank 𝕜 V₁ = finrank 𝕜 V₂) : (li.toAffineIsometryEquiv h : P₁ → P₂) = li :=
rfl
#align affine_isometry.coe_to_affine_isometry_equiv AffineIsometry.coe_toAffineIsometryEquiv
@[simp]
theorem toAffineIsometryEquiv_apply [Inhabited P₁] (li : P₁ →ᵃⁱ[𝕜] P₂)
(h : finrank 𝕜 V₁ = finrank 𝕜 V₂) (x : P₁) : (li.toAffineIsometryEquiv h) x = li x :=
rfl
#align affine_isometry.to_affine_isometry_equiv_apply AffineIsometry.toAffineIsometryEquiv_apply
end AffineIsometry
section CompleteField
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {F : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type x}
[AddCommGroup F'] [Module 𝕜 F'] [TopologicalSpace F'] [TopologicalAddGroup F']
[ContinuousSMul 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
section Affine
variable {PE PF : Type*} [MetricSpace PE] [NormedAddTorsor E PE] [MetricSpace PF]
[NormedAddTorsor F PF] [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E]
theorem AffineMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional (f : PE →ᵃ[𝕜] PF) : Continuous f :=
AffineMap.continuous_linear_iff.1 f.linear.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_map.continuous_of_finite_dimensional AffineMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
theorem AffineEquiv.continuous_of_finiteDimensional (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) : Continuous f :=
f.toAffineMap.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_equiv.continuous_of_finite_dimensional AffineEquiv.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
/-- Reinterpret an affine equivalence as a homeomorphism. -/
def AffineEquiv.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) : PE ≃ₜ PF where
toEquiv := f.toEquiv
continuous_toFun := f.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
continuous_invFun :=
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 F := f.linear.finiteDimensional
f.symm.continuous_of_finiteDimensional
#align affine_equiv.to_homeomorph_of_finite_dimensional AffineEquiv.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) :
⇑f.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional = f :=
rfl
#align affine_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph_of_finite_dimensional AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional_symm (f : PE ≃ᵃ[𝕜] PF) :
⇑f.toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional.symm = f.symm :=
rfl
#align affine_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph_of_finite_dimensional_symm AffineEquiv.coe_toHomeomorphOfFiniteDimensional_symm
end Affine
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => f.det := by
change Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] E => LinearMap.det (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E)
-- Porting note: this could be easier with `det_cases`
by_cases h : ∃ s : Finset E, Nonempty (Basis (↥s) 𝕜 E)
· rcases h with ⟨s, ⟨b⟩⟩
haveI : FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E := FiniteDimensional.of_fintype_basis b
simp_rw [LinearMap.det_eq_det_toMatrix_of_finset b]
refine Continuous.matrix_det ?_
exact
((LinearMap.toMatrix b b).toLinearMap.comp
(ContinuousLinearMap.coeLM 𝕜)).continuous_of_finiteDimensional
· -- Porting note: was `unfold LinearMap.det`
rw [LinearMap.det_def]
simpa only [h, MonoidHom.one_apply, dif_neg, not_false_iff] using continuous_const
#align continuous_linear_map.continuous_det ContinuousLinearMap.continuous_det
/-- Any `K`-Lipschitz map from a subset `s` of a metric space `α` to a finite-dimensional real
vector space `E'` can be extended to a Lipschitz map on the whole space `α`, with a slightly worse
constant `C * K` where `C` only depends on `E'`. We record a working value for this constant `C`
as `lipschitzExtensionConstant E'`. -/
irreducible_def lipschitzExtensionConstant (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : ℝ≥0 :=
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
max (‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊) 1
#align lipschitz_extension_constant lipschitzExtensionConstant
theorem lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos (E' : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] : 0 < lipschitzExtensionConstant E' := by
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant]
exact zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _)
#align lipschitz_extension_constant_pos lipschitzExtensionConstant_pos
/-- Any `K`-Lipschitz map from a subset `s` of a metric space `α` to a finite-dimensional real
vector space `E'` can be extended to a Lipschitz map on the whole space `α`, with a slightly worse
constant `lipschitzExtensionConstant E' * K`. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E'] {s : Set α} {f : α → E'}
{K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f s) :
∃ g : α → E', LipschitzWith (lipschitzExtensionConstant E' * K) g ∧ EqOn f g s := by
/- This result is already known for spaces `ι → ℝ`. We use a continuous linear equiv between
`E'` and such a space to transfer the result to `E'`. -/
let ι : Type _ := Basis.ofVectorSpaceIndex ℝ E'
let A := (Basis.ofVectorSpace ℝ E').equivFun.toContinuousLinearEquiv
have LA : LipschitzWith ‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A := by apply A.lipschitz
have L : LipschitzOnWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) (A ∘ f) s :=
LA.comp_lipschitzOnWith hf
obtain ⟨g, hg, gs⟩ :
∃ g : α → ι → ℝ, LipschitzWith (‖A.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * K) g ∧ EqOn (A ∘ f) g s :=
L.extend_pi
refine ⟨A.symm ∘ g, ?_, ?_⟩
· have LAsymm : LipschitzWith ‖A.symm.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ A.symm := by
apply A.symm.lipschitz
apply (LAsymm.comp hg).weaken
rw [lipschitzExtensionConstant, ← mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul' (le_max_left _ _) le_rfl
· intro x hx
have : A (f x) = g x := gs hx
simp only [(· ∘ ·), ← this, A.symm_apply_apply]
#align lipschitz_on_with.extend_finite_dimension LipschitzOnWith.extend_finite_dimension
theorem LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) : ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial E
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, AntilipschitzWith.of_subsingleton⟩
· rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot] at hf
let e : E ≃L[𝕜] LinearMap.range f := (LinearEquiv.ofInjective f hf).toContinuousLinearEquiv
exact ⟨_, e.nnnorm_symm_pos, e.antilipschitz⟩
#align linear_map.exists_antilipschitz_with LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith
open Function in
/-- A `LinearMap` on a finite-dimensional space over a complete field
is injective iff it is anti-Lipschitz. -/
theorem LinearMap.injective_iff_antilipschitz [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F) :
Injective f ↔ ∃ K > 0, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
constructor
· rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
exact f.exists_antilipschitzWith
· rintro ⟨K, -, H⟩
exact H.injective
open Function in
/-- The set of injective continuous linear maps `E → F` is open,
if `E` is finite-dimensional over a complete field. -/
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.isOpen_injective [FiniteDimensional 𝕜 E] :
IsOpen { L : E →L[𝕜] F | Injective L } := by
rw [isOpen_iff_eventually]
rintro φ₀ hφ₀
rcases φ₀.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mp hφ₀ with ⟨K, K_pos, H⟩
have : ∀ᶠ φ in 𝓝 φ₀, ‖φ - φ₀‖₊ < K⁻¹ := eventually_nnnorm_sub_lt _ <| inv_pos_of_pos K_pos
filter_upwards [this] with φ hφ
apply φ.injective_iff_antilipschitz.mpr
exact ⟨(K⁻¹ - ‖φ - φ₀‖₊)⁻¹, inv_pos_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt hφ),
H.add_sub_lipschitzWith (φ - φ₀).lipschitz hφ⟩
protected theorem LinearIndependent.eventually {ι} [Finite ι] {f : ι → E}
(hf : LinearIndependent 𝕜 f) : ∀ᶠ g in 𝓝 f, LinearIndependent 𝕜 g := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
simp only [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff'] at hf ⊢
rcases LinearMap.exists_antilipschitzWith _ hf with ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
have : Tendsto (fun g : ι → E => ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖) (𝓝 f) (𝓝 <| ∑ i, ‖f i - f i‖) :=
tendsto_finset_sum _ fun i _ =>
Tendsto.norm <| ((continuous_apply i).tendsto _).sub tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [sub_self, norm_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero] at this
refine (this.eventually (gt_mem_nhds <| inv_pos.2 K0)).mono fun g hg => ?_
replace hg : ∑ i, ‖g i - f i‖₊ < K⁻¹ := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe]
push_cast
exact hg
rw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot]
refine (hK.add_sub_lipschitzWith (LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun v u => ?_) hg).injective
simp only [dist_eq_norm, LinearMap.lsum_apply, Pi.sub_apply, LinearMap.sum_apply,
LinearMap.comp_apply, LinearMap.proj_apply, LinearMap.smulRight_apply, LinearMap.id_apply, ←
Finset.sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, ← sub_smul, NNReal.coe_sum, coe_nnnorm, Finset.sum_mul]
refine norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun i _ => ?_
rw [norm_smul, mul_comm]
gcongr
exact norm_le_pi_norm (v - u) i
#align linear_independent.eventually LinearIndependent.eventually
theorem isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
IsOpen { f : ι → E | LinearIndependent 𝕜 f } :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun _ => LinearIndependent.eventually
#align is_open_set_of_linear_independent isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent
theorem isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank (n : ℕ) :
IsOpen { f : E →L[𝕜] F | ↑n ≤ (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F).rank } := by
simp only [LinearMap.le_rank_iff_exists_linearIndependent_finset, setOf_exists, ← exists_prop]
refine isOpen_biUnion fun t _ => ?_
have : Continuous fun f : E →L[𝕜] F => fun x : (t : Set E) => f x :=
continuous_pi fun x => (ContinuousLinearMap.apply 𝕜 F (x : E)).continuous
exact isOpen_setOf_linearIndependent.preimage this
#align is_open_set_of_nat_le_rank isOpen_setOf_nat_le_rank
theorem Basis.opNNNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} (M : ℝ≥0)
(hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖₊ ≤ M) : ‖u‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖₊ * M :=
u.opNNNorm_le_bound _ fun e => by
set φ := v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap
calc
‖u e‖₊ = ‖u (∑ i, v.equivFun e i • v i)‖₊ := by rw [v.sum_equivFun]
_ = ‖∑ i, v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := by simp [map_sum, LinearMap.map_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i • (u <| v i)‖₊ := nnnorm_sum_le _ _
_ = ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * ‖u (v i)‖₊ := by simp only [nnnorm_smul]
_ ≤ ∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ * M := by gcongr; apply hu
_ = (∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊) * M := by rw [Finset.sum_mul]
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) * M := by
gcongr
calc
∑ i, ‖v.equivFun e i‖₊ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖φ e‖₊ := Pi.sum_nnnorm_apply_le_nnnorm _
_ ≤ Fintype.card ι • (‖φ‖₊ * ‖e‖₊) := nsmul_le_nsmul_right (φ.le_opNNNorm e) _
_ = Fintype.card ι • ‖φ‖₊ * M * ‖e‖₊ := by simp only [smul_mul_assoc, mul_right_comm]
#align basis.op_nnnorm_le Basis.opNNNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias Basis.op_nnnorm_le := Basis.opNNNorm_le
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/FiniteDimension.lean | 317 | 320 | theorem Basis.opNorm_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (v : Basis ι 𝕜 E) {u : E →L[𝕜] F} {M : ℝ}
(hM : 0 ≤ M) (hu : ∀ i, ‖u (v i)‖ ≤ M) :
‖u‖ ≤ Fintype.card ι • ‖v.equivFunL.toContinuousLinearMap‖ * M := by |
simpa using NNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr (v.opNNNorm_le ⟨M, hM⟩ hu)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFunc
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MutuallySingular
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Count
import Mathlib.Topology.IndicatorConstPointwise
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Real
#align_import measure_theory.integral.lebesgue from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
/-!
# Lower Lebesgue integral for `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions
We define the lower Lebesgue integral of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function.
## Notation
We introduce the following notation for the lower Lebesgue integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
* `∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to a measure `μ`;
* `∫⁻ x, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` with respect to the canonical measure
`volume` on `α`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to a measure `μ`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`;
* `∫⁻ x in s, f x`: integral of a function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞` over a set `s` with respect
to the canonical measure `volume`, defined as `∫⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`.
-/
assert_not_exists NormedSpace
set_option autoImplicit true
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
section Lintegral
open SimpleFunc
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- The **lower Lebesgue integral** of a function `f` with respect to a measure `μ`. -/
irreducible_def lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨆ (g : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (_ : ⇑g ≤ f), g.lintegral μ
#align measure_theory.lintegral MeasureTheory.lintegral
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫⁻ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫⁻ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3 "∫⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => lintegral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.lintegral]
notation3"∫⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => lintegral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
theorem SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = f.lintegral μ := by
rw [MeasureTheory.lintegral]
exact le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun g hg => lintegral_mono hg <| le_rfl)
(le_iSup₂_of_le f le_rfl le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.lintegral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral
@[mono]
theorem lintegral_mono' {m : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ ν : Measure α⦄ (hμν : μ ≤ ν) ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄
(hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂ν := by
rw [lintegral, lintegral]
exact iSup_mono fun φ => iSup_mono' fun hφ => ⟨le_trans hφ hfg, lintegral_mono (le_refl φ) hμν⟩
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono'
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn' ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) (h2 : μ ≤ ν) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral ν g :=
lintegral_mono' h2 hfg
theorem lintegral_mono ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (le_refl μ) hfg
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono
-- workaround for the known eta-reduction issue with `@[gcongr]`
@[gcongr] theorem lintegral_mono_fn ⦃f g : α → ℝ≥0∞⦄ (hfg : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) :
lintegral μ f ≤ lintegral μ g :=
lintegral_mono hfg
theorem lintegral_mono_nnreal {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (h : f ≤ g) : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_nnreal MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_nnreal
theorem iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨆ (g : α → ℝ≥0∞) (_ : Measurable g) (_ : g ≤ f), ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun _ => iSup_le fun h'i => lintegral_mono h'i
· rw [lintegral]
refine iSup₂_le fun i hi => le_iSup₂_of_le i i.measurable <| le_iSup_of_le hi ?_
exact le_of_eq (i.lintegral_eq_lintegral _).symm
#align measure_theory.supr_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral
theorem lintegral_mono_set {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set
theorem lintegral_mono_set' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} ⦃μ : Measure α⦄ {s t : Set α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono' (Measure.restrict_mono' hst (le_refl μ)) (le_refl f)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_mono_set' MeasureTheory.lintegral_mono_set'
theorem monotone_lintegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Monotone (lintegral μ) :=
lintegral_mono
#align measure_theory.monotone_lintegral MeasureTheory.monotone_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ = c * μ univ := by
rw [← SimpleFunc.const_lintegral, ← SimpleFunc.lintegral_eq_lintegral, SimpleFunc.coe_const]
rfl
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const MeasureTheory.lintegral_const
theorem lintegral_zero : ∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero
theorem lintegral_zero_fun : lintegral μ (0 : α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 :=
lintegral_zero
#align measure_theory.lintegral_zero_fun MeasureTheory.lintegral_zero_fun
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem lintegral_one : ∫⁻ _, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = μ univ := by rw [lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_one MeasureTheory.lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const (s : Set α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ = c * μ s := by
rw [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const
theorem set_lintegral_one (s) : ∫⁻ _ in s, 1 ∂μ = μ s := by rw [set_lintegral_const, one_mul]
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_one MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_one
theorem set_lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (s : Set α) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
∫⁻ _ in s, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top hc (measure_ne_top (μ.restrict s) univ)
#align measure_theory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.set_lintegral_const_lt_top
theorem lintegral_const_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : ∫⁻ _, c ∂μ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Measure.restrict_univ] using set_lintegral_const_lt_top (univ : Set α) hc
#align measure_theory.lintegral_const_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_const_lt_top
section
variable (μ)
/-- For any function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`, there exists a measurable function `g ≤ f` with the same
integral. -/
theorem exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) 0 with h₀ | h₀
· exact ⟨0, measurable_zero, zero_le f, h₀.trans lintegral_zero.symm⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto' h₀.bot_lt with ⟨L, _, hLf, hL_tendsto⟩
have : ∀ n, ∃ g : α → ℝ≥0∞, Measurable g ∧ g ≤ f ∧ L n < ∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ := by
intro n
simpa only [← iSup_lintegral_measurable_le_eq_lintegral f, lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop] using
(hLf n).2
choose g hgm hgf hLg using this
refine
⟨fun x => ⨆ n, g n x, measurable_iSup hgm, fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine le_of_tendsto' hL_tendsto fun n => (hLg n).le.trans <| lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
exact le_iSup (fun n => g n x) n
· exact lintegral_mono fun x => iSup_le fun n => hgf n x
#align measure_theory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.exists_measurable_le_lintegral_eq
end
/-- `∫⁻ a in s, f a ∂μ` is defined as the supremum of integrals of simple functions
`φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞` such that `φ ≤ f`. This lemma says that it suffices to take
functions `φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Lebesgue.lean | 199 | 220 | theorem lintegral_eq_nnreal {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ =
⨆ (φ : α →ₛ ℝ≥0) (_ : ∀ x, ↑(φ x) ≤ f x), (φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞)).lintegral μ := by |
rw [lintegral]
refine
le_antisymm (iSup₂_le fun φ hφ => ?_) (iSup_mono' fun φ => ⟨φ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞), le_rfl⟩)
by_cases h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, φ a ≠ ∞
· let ψ := φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal
replace h : ψ.map ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) =ᵐ[μ] φ := h.mono fun a => ENNReal.coe_toNNReal
have : ∀ x, ↑(ψ x) ≤ f x := fun x => le_trans ENNReal.coe_toNNReal_le_self (hφ x)
exact
le_iSup_of_le (φ.map ENNReal.toNNReal) (le_iSup_of_le this (ge_of_eq <| lintegral_congr h))
· have h_meas : μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) ≠ 0 := mt measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.1 h
refine le_trans le_top (ge_of_eq <| (iSup_eq_top _).2 fun b hb => ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, b < n * μ (φ ⁻¹' {∞}) := exists_nat_mul_gt h_meas (ne_of_lt hb)
use (const α (n : ℝ≥0)).restrict (φ ⁻¹' {∞})
simp only [lt_iSup_iff, exists_prop, coe_restrict, φ.measurableSet_preimage, coe_const,
ENNReal.coe_indicator, map_coe_ennreal_restrict, SimpleFunc.map_const, ENNReal.coe_natCast,
restrict_const_lintegral]
refine ⟨indicator_le fun x hx => le_trans ?_ (hφ _), hn⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp only [hx, le_top]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 222 | 222 | theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by | simp [arg, le_refl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import data.finset.n_ary from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"eba7871095e834365616b5e43c8c7bb0b37058d0"
/-!
# N-ary images of finsets
This file defines `Finset.image₂`, the binary image of finsets. This is the finset version of
`Set.image2`. This is mostly useful to define pointwise operations.
## Notes
This file is very similar to `Data.Set.NAry`, `Order.Filter.NAry` and `Data.Option.NAry`. Please
keep them in sync.
We do not define `Finset.image₃` as its only purpose would be to prove properties of `Finset.image₂`
and `Set.image2` already fulfills this task.
-/
open Function Set
variable {α α' β β' γ γ' δ δ' ε ε' ζ ζ' ν : Type*}
namespace Finset
variable [DecidableEq α'] [DecidableEq β'] [DecidableEq γ] [DecidableEq γ'] [DecidableEq δ]
[DecidableEq δ'] [DecidableEq ε] [DecidableEq ε'] {f f' : α → β → γ} {g g' : α → β → γ → δ}
{s s' : Finset α} {t t' : Finset β} {u u' : Finset γ} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : γ}
/-- The image of a binary function `f : α → β → γ` as a function `Finset α → Finset β → Finset γ`.
Mathematically this should be thought of as the image of the corresponding function `α × β → γ`. -/
def image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset γ :=
(s ×ˢ t).image <| uncurry f
#align finset.image₂ Finset.image₂
@[simp]
theorem mem_image₂ : c ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, ∃ b ∈ t, f a b = c := by
simp [image₂, and_assoc]
#align finset.mem_image₂ Finset.mem_image₂
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_image₂ (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t : Set γ) = Set.image2 f s t :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_image₂
#align finset.coe_image₂ Finset.coe_image₂
theorem card_image₂_le (f : α → β → γ) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t).card ≤ s.card * t.card :=
card_image_le.trans_eq <| card_product _ _
#align finset.card_image₂_le Finset.card_image₂_le
theorem card_image₂_iff :
(image₂ f s t).card = s.card * t.card ↔ (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)).InjOn fun x => f x.1 x.2 := by
rw [← card_product, ← coe_product]
exact card_image_iff
#align finset.card_image₂_iff Finset.card_image₂_iff
theorem card_image₂ (hf : Injective2 f) (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(image₂ f s t).card = s.card * t.card :=
(card_image_of_injective _ hf.uncurry).trans <| card_product _ _
#align finset.card_image₂ Finset.card_image₂
theorem mem_image₂_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t :=
mem_image₂.2 ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩
#align finset.mem_image₂_of_mem Finset.mem_image₂_of_mem
theorem mem_image₂_iff (hf : Injective2 f) : f a b ∈ image₂ f s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, mem_image2_iff hf, mem_coe, mem_coe]
#align finset.mem_image₂_iff Finset.mem_image₂_iff
theorem image₂_subset (hs : s ⊆ s') (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t' := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_image₂, coe_image₂]
exact image2_subset hs ht
#align finset.image₂_subset Finset.image₂_subset
theorem image₂_subset_left (ht : t ⊆ t') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s t' :=
image₂_subset Subset.rfl ht
#align finset.image₂_subset_left Finset.image₂_subset_left
theorem image₂_subset_right (hs : s ⊆ s') : image₂ f s t ⊆ image₂ f s' t :=
image₂_subset hs Subset.rfl
#align finset.image₂_subset_right Finset.image₂_subset_right
theorem image_subset_image₂_left (hb : b ∈ t) : s.image (fun a => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => mem_image₂_of_mem ha hb
#align finset.image_subset_image₂_left Finset.image_subset_image₂_left
theorem image_subset_image₂_right (ha : a ∈ s) : t.image (fun b => f a b) ⊆ image₂ f s t :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ => mem_image₂_of_mem ha
#align finset.image_subset_image₂_right Finset.image_subset_image₂_right
theorem forall_image₂_iff {p : γ → Prop} :
(∀ z ∈ image₂ f s t, p z) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (f x y) := by
simp_rw [← mem_coe, coe_image₂, forall_image2_iff]
#align finset.forall_image₂_iff Finset.forall_image₂_iff
@[simp]
theorem image₂_subset_iff : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, f x y ∈ u :=
forall_image₂_iff
#align finset.image₂_subset_iff Finset.image₂_subset_iff
theorem image₂_subset_iff_left : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, (t.image fun b => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff]
#align finset.image₂_subset_iff_left Finset.image₂_subset_iff_left
theorem image₂_subset_iff_right : image₂ f s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, (s.image fun a => f a b) ⊆ u := by
simp_rw [image₂_subset_iff, image_subset_iff, @forall₂_swap α]
#align finset.image₂_subset_iff_right Finset.image₂_subset_iff_right
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem image₂_nonempty_iff : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_image₂]
exact image2_nonempty_iff
#align finset.image₂_nonempty_iff Finset.image₂_nonempty_iff
theorem Nonempty.image₂ (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) : (image₂ f s t).Nonempty :=
image₂_nonempty_iff.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
#align finset.nonempty.image₂ Finset.Nonempty.image₂
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_left (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).1
#align finset.nonempty.of_image₂_left Finset.Nonempty.of_image₂_left
theorem Nonempty.of_image₂_right (h : (s.image₂ f t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
(image₂_nonempty_iff.1 h).2
#align finset.nonempty.of_image₂_right Finset.Nonempty.of_image₂_right
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_left : image₂ f ∅ t = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
#align finset.image₂_empty_left Finset.image₂_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem image₂_empty_right : image₂ f s ∅ = ∅ :=
coe_injective <| by simp
#align finset.image₂_empty_right Finset.image₂_empty_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NAry.lean | 145 | 146 | theorem image₂_eq_empty_iff : image₂ f s t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ := by |
simp_rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, image₂_nonempty_iff, not_and_or]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_singleton Nat.ofDigits_singleton
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_one_cons Nat.ofDigits_one_cons
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
#align nat.of_digits_append Nat.ofDigits_append
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
#align nat.coe_of_digits Nat.coe_ofDigits
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
#align nat.coe_int_of_digits Nat.coe_int_ofDigits
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
#align nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero Nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
#align nat.digits_of_digits Nat.digits_ofDigits
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 267 | 287 | theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by |
cases' b with b
· cases' n with n
· rfl
· change ofDigits 0 [n + 1] = n + 1
dsimp [ofDigits]
· cases' b with b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· apply Nat.strongInductionOn n _
clear n
intro n h
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.fin.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3a2b5524a138b5d0b818b858b516d4ac8a484b03"
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
* `Fin.succRec` : Define `C n i` by induction on `i : Fin n` interpreted
as `(0 : Fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`. This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines
`0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple, and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element
of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element of `n`-tuple.
* `Fin.succRecOn` : same as `Fin.succRec` but `i : Fin n` is the first argument;
* `Fin.induction` : Define `C i` by induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)`, separating into the
`Nat`-like base cases of `C 0` and `C (i.succ)`.
* `Fin.inductionOn` : same as `Fin.induction` but with `i : Fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
* `Fin.cases` : define `f : Π i : Fin n.succ, C i` by separately handling the cases `i = 0` and
`i = Fin.succ j`, `j : Fin n`, defined using `Fin.induction`.
* `Fin.reverseInduction`: reverse induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)`; given `C (Fin.last n)` and
`∀ i : Fin n, C (Fin.succ i) → C (Fin.castSucc i)`, constructs all values `C i` by going down;
* `Fin.lastCases`: define `f : Π i, Fin (n + 1), C i` by separately handling the cases
`i = Fin.last n` and `i = Fin.castSucc j`, a special case of `Fin.reverseInduction`;
* `Fin.addCases`: define a function on `Fin (m + n)` by separately handling the cases
`Fin.castAdd n i` and `Fin.natAdd m i`;
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: given `i : Fin (n + 1)`, define a function on `Fin (n + 1)` by separately
handling the cases `j = i` and `j = Fin.succAbove i k`, same as `Fin.insertNth` but marked
as eliminator and works for `Sort*`. -- Porting note: this is in another file
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.ofNat'`: given a positive number `n` (deduced from `[NeZero n]`), `Fin.ofNat' i` is
`i % n` interpreted as an element of `Fin n`;
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
### Misc definitions
* `Fin.revPerm : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)` : `Fin.rev` as an `Equiv.Perm`, the antitone involution given
by `i ↦ n-(i+1)`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
open Fin Nat Function
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
#align fin_zero_elim finZeroElim
namespace Fin
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
#align fin.elim0' Fin.elim0
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
#align fin.fin_to_nat Fin.coeToNat
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
#align fin.val_injective Fin.val_injective
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
#align fin.prop Fin.prop
#align fin.is_lt Fin.is_lt
#align fin.pos Fin.pos
#align fin.pos_iff_nonempty Fin.pos_iff_nonempty
section Order
variable {a b c : Fin n}
protected lemma lt_of_le_of_lt : a ≤ b → b < c → a < c := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt
protected lemma lt_of_lt_of_le : a < b → b ≤ c → a < c := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le
protected lemma le_rfl : a ≤ a := Nat.le_refl _
protected lemma lt_iff_le_and_ne : a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← val_ne_iff]; exact Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne
protected lemma lt_or_lt_of_ne (h : a ≠ b) : a < b ∨ b < a := Nat.lt_or_lt_of_ne $ val_ne_iff.2 h
protected lemma lt_or_le (a b : Fin n) : a < b ∨ b ≤ a := Nat.lt_or_ge _ _
protected lemma le_or_lt (a b : Fin n) : a ≤ b ∨ b < a := (b.lt_or_le a).symm
protected lemma le_of_eq (hab : a = b) : a ≤ b := Nat.le_of_eq $ congr_arg val hab
protected lemma ge_of_eq (hab : a = b) : b ≤ a := Fin.le_of_eq hab.symm
protected lemma eq_or_lt_of_le : a ≤ b → a = b ∨ a < b := by rw [ext_iff]; exact Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le
protected lemma lt_or_eq_of_le : a ≤ b → a < b ∨ a = b := by rw [ext_iff]; exact Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le
end Order
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt $ Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align fin.equiv_subtype Fin.equivSubtype
#align fin.equiv_subtype_symm_apply Fin.equivSubtype_symm_apply
#align fin.equiv_subtype_apply Fin.equivSubtype_apply
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
#align fin.eta Fin.eta
#align fin.ext Fin.ext
#align fin.ext_iff Fin.ext_iff
#align fin.coe_injective Fin.val_injective
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
ext_iff.symm
#align fin.coe_eq_coe Fin.val_eq_val
@[deprecated ext_iff (since := "2024-02-20")]
theorem eq_iff_veq (a b : Fin n) : a = b ↔ a.1 = b.1 :=
ext_iff
#align fin.eq_iff_veq Fin.eq_iff_veq
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
ext_iff.not
#align fin.ne_iff_vne Fin.ne_iff_vne
-- Porting note: I'm not sure if this comment still applies.
-- built-in reduction doesn't always work
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
ext_iff
#align fin.mk_eq_mk Fin.mk_eq_mk
#align fin.mk.inj_iff Fin.mk.inj_iff
#align fin.mk_val Fin.val_mk
#align fin.eq_mk_iff_coe_eq Fin.eq_mk_iff_val_eq
#align fin.coe_mk Fin.val_mk
#align fin.mk_coe Fin.mk_val
-- syntactic tautologies now
#noalign fin.coe_eq_val
#noalign fin.val_eq_coe
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [Function.funext_iff]
#align fin.heq_fun_iff Fin.heq_fun_iff
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [Function.funext_iff]
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
#align fin.heq_ext_iff Fin.heq_ext_iff
#align fin.exists_iff Fin.exists_iff
#align fin.forall_iff Fin.forall_iff
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
#align fin.is_le Fin.is_le
#align fin.is_le' Fin.is_le'
#align fin.lt_iff_coe_lt_coe Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align fin.le_iff_coe_le_coe Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
#align fin.mk_lt_of_lt_coe Fin.mk_lt_of_lt_val
#align fin.mk_le_of_le_coe Fin.mk_le_of_le_val
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align fin.coe_fin_lt Fin.val_fin_lt
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align fin.coe_fin_le Fin.val_fin_le
#align fin.mk_le_mk Fin.mk_le_mk
#align fin.mk_lt_mk Fin.mk_lt_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
#align fin.min_coe Fin.min_val
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
#align fin.max_coe Fin.max_val
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
#align fin.coe_embedding Fin.valEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
#align fin.equiv_subtype_symm_trans_val_embedding Fin.equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
/-- Given a positive `n`, `Fin.ofNat' i` is `i % n` as an element of `Fin n`. -/
def ofNat'' [NeZero n] (i : ℕ) : Fin n :=
⟨i % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩
#align fin.of_nat' Fin.ofNat''ₓ
-- Porting note: `Fin.ofNat'` conflicts with something in core (there the hypothesis is `n > 0`),
-- so for now we make this double-prime `''`. This is also the reason for the dubious translation.
instance {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : Zero (Fin n) := ⟨ofNat'' 0⟩
instance {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : One (Fin n) := ⟨ofNat'' 1⟩
#align fin.coe_zero Fin.val_zero
/--
The `Fin.val_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((0 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 0 :=
rfl
#align fin.val_zero' Fin.val_zero'
#align fin.mk_zero Fin.mk_zero
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
#align fin.zero_le Fin.zero_le'
#align fin.zero_lt_one Fin.zero_lt_one
#align fin.not_lt_zero Fin.not_lt_zero
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero', Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, Ne, ext_iff, val_zero']
#align fin.pos_iff_ne_zero Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero'
#align fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ
#align fin.eq_succ_of_ne_zero Fin.eq_succ_of_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : cast rfl a = a := rfl
theorem rev_involutive : Involutive (rev : Fin n → Fin n) := fun i =>
ext <| by
dsimp only [rev]
rw [← Nat.sub_sub, Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 i.is_lt), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align fin.rev_involutive Fin.rev_involutive
/-- `Fin.rev` as an `Equiv.Perm`, the antitone involution `Fin n → Fin n` given by
`i ↦ n-(i+1)`. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def revPerm : Equiv.Perm (Fin n) :=
Involutive.toPerm rev rev_involutive
#align fin.rev Fin.revPerm
#align fin.coe_rev Fin.val_revₓ
theorem rev_injective : Injective (@rev n) :=
rev_involutive.injective
#align fin.rev_injective Fin.rev_injective
theorem rev_surjective : Surjective (@rev n) :=
rev_involutive.surjective
#align fin.rev_surjective Fin.rev_surjective
theorem rev_bijective : Bijective (@rev n) :=
rev_involutive.bijective
#align fin.rev_bijective Fin.rev_bijective
#align fin.rev_inj Fin.rev_injₓ
#align fin.rev_rev Fin.rev_revₓ
@[simp]
theorem revPerm_symm : (@revPerm n).symm = revPerm :=
rfl
#align fin.rev_symm Fin.revPerm_symm
#align fin.rev_eq Fin.rev_eqₓ
#align fin.rev_le_rev Fin.rev_le_revₓ
#align fin.rev_lt_rev Fin.rev_lt_revₓ
theorem cast_rev (i : Fin n) (h : n = m) :
cast h i.rev = (i.cast h).rev := by
subst h; simp
theorem rev_eq_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i = j ↔ i = rev j := by
rw [← rev_inj, rev_rev]
theorem rev_ne_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i ≠ j ↔ i ≠ rev j := rev_eq_iff.not
theorem rev_lt_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i < j ↔ rev j < i := by
rw [← rev_lt_rev, rev_rev]
theorem rev_le_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i ≤ j ↔ rev j ≤ i := by
rw [← rev_le_rev, rev_rev]
theorem lt_rev_iff {i j : Fin n} : i < rev j ↔ j < rev i := by
rw [← rev_lt_rev, rev_rev]
theorem le_rev_iff {i j : Fin n} : i ≤ rev j ↔ j ≤ rev i := by
rw [← rev_le_rev, rev_rev]
#align fin.last Fin.last
#align fin.coe_last Fin.val_last
-- Porting note: this is now syntactically equal to `val_last`
#align fin.last_val Fin.val_last
#align fin.le_last Fin.le_last
#align fin.last_pos Fin.last_pos
#align fin.eq_last_of_not_lt Fin.eq_last_of_not_lt
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos.2 n.pos_of_neZero
end Order
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
#align fin.val_one Fin.val_one
#align fin.coe_one Fin.val_one
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
#align fin.coe_one' Fin.val_one'
-- Porting note: Delete this lemma after porting
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
#align fin.one_val Fin.val_one''
#align fin.mk_one Fin.mk_one
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero, Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
-- Porting note: here and in the next lemma, had to use `← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero`.
#align fin.nontrivial_iff_two_le Fin.nontrivial_iff_two_le
#align fin.subsingleton_iff_le_one Fin.subsingleton_iff_le_one
section Monoid
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`, `simp` can prove it with AddCommMonoid instance
protected theorem add_zero [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : k + 0 = k := by
simp only [add_def, val_zero', Nat.add_zero, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
#align fin.add_zero Fin.add_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`, `simp` can prove it with AddCommMonoid instance
protected theorem zero_add [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : 0 + k = k := by
simp [ext_iff, add_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
#align fin.zero_add Fin.zero_add
instance {a : ℕ} [NeZero n] : OfNat (Fin n) a where
ofNat := Fin.ofNat' a n.pos_of_neZero
instance inhabited (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Inhabited (Fin n) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
#align fin.default_eq_zero Fin.default_eq_zero
section from_ad_hoc
@[simp] lemma ofNat'_zero {h : 0 < n} [NeZero n] : (Fin.ofNat' 0 h : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofNat'_one {h : 0 < n} [NeZero n] : (Fin.ofNat' 1 h : Fin n) = 1 := rfl
end from_ad_hoc
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast n := Fin.ofNat'' n
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
#align fin.val_add Fin.val_add
#align fin.coe_add Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
#align fin.coe_add_eq_ite Fin.val_add_eq_ite
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated]
theorem val_bit0 {n : ℕ} (k : Fin n) : ((bit0 k : Fin n) : ℕ) = bit0 (k : ℕ) % n := by
cases k
rfl
#align fin.coe_bit0 Fin.val_bit0
@[deprecated]
theorem val_bit1 {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) :
((bit1 k : Fin n) : ℕ) = bit1 (k : ℕ) % n := by
cases n;
· cases' k with k h
cases k
· show _ % _ = _
simp at h
cases' h with _ h
simp [bit1, Fin.val_bit0, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_one]
#align fin.coe_bit1 Fin.val_bit1
end deprecated
#align fin.coe_add_one_of_lt Fin.val_add_one_of_lt
#align fin.last_add_one Fin.last_add_one
#align fin.coe_add_one Fin.val_add_one
section Bit
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[simp, deprecated]
theorem mk_bit0 {m n : ℕ} (h : bit0 m < n) :
(⟨bit0 m, h⟩ : Fin n) = (bit0 ⟨m, (Nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt h⟩ : Fin _) :=
eq_of_val_eq (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm
#align fin.mk_bit0 Fin.mk_bit0
@[simp, deprecated]
theorem mk_bit1 {m n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : bit1 m < n) :
(⟨bit1 m, h⟩ : Fin n) =
(bit1 ⟨m, (Nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt ((m + m).lt_succ_self.trans h)⟩ : Fin _) := by
ext
simp only [bit1, bit0] at h
simp only [bit1, bit0, val_add, val_one', ← Nat.add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
#align fin.mk_bit1 Fin.mk_bit1
end Bit
#align fin.val_two Fin.val_two
--- Porting note: syntactically the same as the above
#align fin.coe_two Fin.val_two
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat''_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (Fin.ofNat'' a : Fin n) = a :=
rfl
#align fin.of_nat_eq_coe Fin.ofNat''_eq_cast
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
-- Porting note: is this the right name for things involving `Nat.cast`?
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
#align fin.coe_val_of_lt Fin.val_cast_of_lt
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
#align fin.coe_val_eq_self Fin.cast_val_eq_self
-- Porting note: this is syntactically the same as `val_cast_of_lt`
#align fin.coe_coe_of_lt Fin.val_cast_of_lt
-- Porting note: this is syntactically the same as `cast_val_of_lt`
#align fin.coe_coe_eq_self Fin.cast_val_eq_self
@[simp] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_zero := natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
#align fin.coe_nat_eq_last Fin.natCast_eq_last
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias cast_nat_eq_last := natCast_eq_last
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
#align fin.le_coe_last Fin.le_val_last
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
#align fin.add_one_pos Fin.add_one_pos
#align fin.one_pos Fin.one_pos
#align fin.zero_ne_one Fin.zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] : (1 : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n <;> simp [Fin.ext_iff]
#align fin.one_eq_zero_iff Fin.one_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_one_iff [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin n) = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, one_eq_zero_iff]
#align fin.zero_eq_one_iff Fin.zero_eq_one_iff
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
#align fin.coe_succ Fin.val_succ
#align fin.succ_pos Fin.succ_pos
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [ext_iff]
#align fin.succ_injective Fin.succ_injective
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem val_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ := rfl
#align fin.succ_le_succ_iff Fin.succ_le_succ_iff
#align fin.succ_lt_succ_iff Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
#align fin.exists_succ_eq_iff Fin.exists_succ_eq
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
#align fin.succ_inj Fin.succ_inj
#align fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.succ_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
#align fin.succ_zero_eq_one Fin.succ_zero_eq_one'
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
#align fin.succ_zero_eq_one' Fin.succ_zero_eq_one
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
#align fin.succ_one_eq_two Fin.succ_one_eq_two'
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
#align fin.succ_one_eq_two' Fin.succ_one_eq_two
#align fin.succ_mk Fin.succ_mk
#align fin.mk_succ_pos Fin.mk_succ_pos
#align fin.one_lt_succ_succ Fin.one_lt_succ_succ
#align fin.add_one_lt_iff Fin.add_one_lt_iff
#align fin.add_one_le_iff Fin.add_one_le_iff
#align fin.last_le_iff Fin.last_le_iff
#align fin.lt_add_one_iff Fin.lt_add_one_iff
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
#align fin.le_zero_iff Fin.le_zero_iff'
#align fin.succ_succ_ne_one Fin.succ_succ_ne_one
#align fin.cast_lt Fin.castLT
#align fin.coe_cast_lt Fin.coe_castLT
#align fin.cast_lt_mk Fin.castLT_mk
-- Move to Batteries?
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {n : Nat} (h : n = n) :
Fin.cast h = id := rfl
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun a b hab ↦ ext (by have := congr_arg val hab; exact this)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
#align fin.cast_succ_injective Fin.castSucc_injective
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps! apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
#align fin.coe_cast_le Fin.coe_castLE
#align fin.cast_le_mk Fin.castLE_mk
#align fin.cast_le_zero Fin.castLE_zero
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
assert_not_exists Fintype
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
cases' h with e
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
#align fin.equiv_iff_eq Fin.equiv_iff_eq
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Fin.ext rfl⟩⟩
#align fin.range_cast_le Fin.range_castLE
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
#align fin.coe_of_injective_cast_le_symm Fin.coe_of_injective_castLE_symm
#align fin.cast_le_succ Fin.castLE_succ
#align fin.cast_le_cast_le Fin.castLE_castLE
#align fin.cast_le_comp_cast_le Fin.castLE_comp_castLE
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (cast eq.symm) (cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (cast eq.symm) (cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : cast eq a ≤ cast eq b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := cast eq
invFun := cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
#align fin_congr finCongr
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
#align fin_congr_apply_mk finCongr_apply_mk
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
#align fin_congr_symm finCongr_symm
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
#align fin_congr_apply_coe finCongr_apply_coe
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
#align fin_congr_symm_apply_coe finCongr_symm_apply_coe
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
#align fin.coe_cast Fin.coe_castₓ
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero {n' : ℕ} [NeZero n] {h : n = n'} : cast h (0 : Fin n) =
by { haveI : NeZero n' := by {rw [← h]; infer_instance}; exact 0} :=
ext rfl
#align fin.cast_zero Fin.cast_zero
#align fin.cast_last Fin.cast_lastₓ
#align fin.cast_mk Fin.cast_mkₓ
#align fin.cast_trans Fin.cast_transₓ
#align fin.cast_le_of_eq Fin.castLE_of_eq
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
#align fin.cast_eq_cast Fin.cast_eq_cast
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
#align fin.coe_cast_add Fin.coe_castAdd
#align fin.cast_add_zero Fin.castAdd_zeroₓ
#align fin.cast_add_lt Fin.castAdd_lt
#align fin.cast_add_mk Fin.castAdd_mk
#align fin.cast_add_cast_lt Fin.castAdd_castLT
#align fin.cast_lt_cast_add Fin.castLT_castAdd
#align fin.cast_add_cast Fin.castAdd_castₓ
#align fin.cast_cast_add_left Fin.cast_castAdd_leftₓ
#align fin.cast_cast_add_right Fin.cast_castAdd_rightₓ
#align fin.cast_add_cast_add Fin.castAdd_castAdd
#align fin.cast_succ_eq Fin.cast_succ_eqₓ
#align fin.succ_cast_eq Fin.succ_cast_eqₓ
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
#align fin.coe_cast_succ Fin.coe_castSucc
#align fin.cast_succ_mk Fin.castSucc_mk
#align fin.cast_cast_succ Fin.cast_castSuccₓ
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_succ Fin.castSucc_lt_succ
#align fin.le_cast_succ_iff Fin.le_castSucc_iff
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_iff_succ_le Fin.castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le
#align fin.succ_last Fin.succ_last
#align fin.succ_eq_last_succ Fin.succ_eq_last_succ
#align fin.cast_succ_cast_lt Fin.castSucc_castLT
#align fin.cast_lt_cast_succ Fin.castLT_castSucc
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_cast_succ_iff Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
#align fin.succ_above_lt_gt Fin.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ
@[deprecated] alias succAbove_lt_gt := castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 928 | 930 | theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by |
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Base
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.MeasureSpaceDef
#align_import measure_theory.measure.doubling from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5f6e827d81dfbeb6151d7016586ceeb0099b9655"
/-!
# Uniformly locally doubling measures
A uniformly locally doubling measure `μ` on a metric space is a measure for which there exists a
constant `C` such that for all sufficiently small radii `ε`, and for any centre, the measure of a
ball of radius `2 * ε` is bounded by `C` times the measure of the concentric ball of radius `ε`.
This file records basic facts about uniformly locally doubling measures.
## Main definitions
* `IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure`: the definition of a uniformly locally doubling measure (as a
typeclass).
* `IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.doublingConstant`: a function yielding the doubling constant `C`
appearing in the definition of a uniformly locally doubling measure.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace ENNReal NNReal Topology
/-- A measure `μ` is said to be a uniformly locally doubling measure if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all sufficiently small radii `ε`, and for any centre, the measure of a ball of radius
`2 * ε` is bounded by `C` times the measure of the concentric ball of radius `ε`.
Note: it is important that this definition makes a demand only for sufficiently small `ε`. For
example we want hyperbolic space to carry the instance `IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure volume` but
volumes grow exponentially in hyperbolic space. To be really explicit, consider the hyperbolic plane
of curvature -1, the area of a disc of radius `ε` is `A(ε) = 2π(cosh(ε) - 1)` so
`A(2ε)/A(ε) ~ exp(ε)`. -/
class IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α]
(μ : Measure α) : Prop where
exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul'' :
∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] 0, ∀ x, μ (closedBall x (2 * ε)) ≤ C * μ (closedBall x ε)
#align is_unif_loc_doubling_measure IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure
namespace IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure
variable {α : Type*} [MetricSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
[IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure μ]
-- Porting note: added for missing infer kinds
theorem exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul :
∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] 0, ∀ x, μ (closedBall x (2 * ε)) ≤ C * μ (closedBall x ε) :=
exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul''
/-- A doubling constant for a uniformly locally doubling measure.
See also `IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.scalingConstantOf`. -/
def doublingConstant : ℝ≥0 :=
Classical.choose <| exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul μ
#align is_unif_loc_doubling_measure.doubling_constant IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.doublingConstant
theorem exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul' :
∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] 0, ∀ x, μ (closedBall x (2 * ε)) ≤ doublingConstant μ * μ (closedBall x ε) :=
Classical.choose_spec <| exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul μ
#align is_unif_loc_doubling_measure.exists_measure_closed_ball_le_mul' IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul'
theorem exists_eventually_forall_measure_closedBall_le_mul (K : ℝ) :
∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] 0, ∀ x, ∀ t ≤ K, μ (closedBall x (t * ε)) ≤ C * μ (closedBall x ε) := by
let C := doublingConstant μ
have hμ :
∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ ε in 𝓝[>] 0, ∀ x,
μ (closedBall x ((2 : ℝ) ^ n * ε)) ≤ ↑(C ^ n) * μ (closedBall x ε) := by
intro n
induction' n with n ih
· simp
replace ih := eventually_nhdsWithin_pos_mul_left (two_pos : 0 < (2 : ℝ)) ih
refine (ih.and (exists_measure_closedBall_le_mul' μ)).mono fun ε hε x => ?_
calc
μ (closedBall x ((2 : ℝ) ^ (n + 1) * ε)) = μ (closedBall x ((2 : ℝ) ^ n * (2 * ε))) := by
rw [pow_succ, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ ↑(C ^ n) * μ (closedBall x (2 * ε)) := hε.1 x
_ ≤ ↑(C ^ n) * (C * μ (closedBall x ε)) := by gcongr; exact hε.2 x
_ = ↑(C ^ (n + 1)) * μ (closedBall x ε) := by rw [← mul_assoc, pow_succ, ENNReal.coe_mul]
rcases lt_or_le K 1 with (hK | hK)
· refine ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
refine eventually_mem_nhdsWithin.mono fun ε hε x t ht ↦ ?_
gcongr
nlinarith [mem_Ioi.mp hε]
· use C ^ ⌈Real.logb 2 K⌉₊
filter_upwards [hμ ⌈Real.logb 2 K⌉₊, eventually_mem_nhdsWithin] with ε hε hε₀ x t ht
refine le_trans ?_ (hε x)
gcongr
· exact (mem_Ioi.mp hε₀).le
· refine ht.trans ?_
rw [← Real.rpow_natCast, ← Real.logb_le_iff_le_rpow]
exacts [Nat.le_ceil _, by norm_num, by linarith]
#align is_unif_loc_doubling_measure.exists_eventually_forall_measure_closed_ball_le_mul IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.exists_eventually_forall_measure_closedBall_le_mul
/-- A variant of `IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.doublingConstant` which allows for scaling the
radius by values other than `2`. -/
def scalingConstantOf (K : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
max (Classical.choose <| exists_eventually_forall_measure_closedBall_le_mul μ K) 1
#align is_unif_loc_doubling_measure.scaling_constant_of IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.scalingConstantOf
@[simp]
theorem one_le_scalingConstantOf (K : ℝ) : 1 ≤ scalingConstantOf μ K :=
le_max_of_le_right <| le_refl 1
#align is_unif_loc_doubling_measure.one_le_scaling_constant_of IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure.one_le_scalingConstantOf
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Doubling.lean | 113 | 129 | theorem eventually_measure_mul_le_scalingConstantOf_mul (K : ℝ) :
∃ R : ℝ,
0 < R ∧
∀ x t r, t ∈ Ioc 0 K → r ≤ R →
μ (closedBall x (t * r)) ≤ scalingConstantOf μ K * μ (closedBall x r) := by |
have h := Classical.choose_spec (exists_eventually_forall_measure_closedBall_le_mul μ K)
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi_iff_exists_Ioc_subset.1 h with ⟨R, Rpos, hR⟩
refine ⟨R, Rpos, fun x t r ht hr => ?_⟩
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (rneg | rfl | rpos)
· have : t * r < 0 := mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg ht.1 rneg
simp only [closedBall_eq_empty.2 this, measure_empty, zero_le']
· simp only [mul_zero, closedBall_zero]
refine le_mul_of_one_le_of_le ?_ le_rfl
apply ENNReal.one_le_coe_iff.2 (le_max_right _ _)
· apply (hR ⟨rpos, hr⟩ x t ht.2).trans
gcongr
apply le_max_left
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Subtype
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Sigma.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Conjugate
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Tactic.Convert
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.GeneralizeProofs
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
#align_import logic.equiv.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cd391184c85986113f8c00844cfe6dda1d34be3d"
/-!
# Equivalence between types
In this file we continue the work on equivalences begun in `Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean`, defining
* canonical isomorphisms between various types: e.g.,
- `Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool` is the canonical equivalence between the sum of two types `α ⊕ β`
and the sigma-type `Σ b : Bool, b.casesOn α β`;
- `Equiv.prodSumDistrib : α × (β ⊕ γ) ≃ (α × β) ⊕ (α × γ)` shows that type product and type sum
satisfy the distributive law up to a canonical equivalence;
* operations on equivalences: e.g.,
- `Equiv.prodCongr ea eb : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`: combine two equivalences `ea : α₁ ≃ α₂` and
`eb : β₁ ≃ β₂` using `Prod.map`.
More definitions of this kind can be found in other files.
E.g., `Data/Equiv/TransferInstance.lean` does it for many algebraic type classes like
`Group`, `Module`, etc.
## Tags
equivalence, congruence, bijective map
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
universe u
open Function
namespace Equiv
/-- `PProd α β` is equivalent to `α × β` -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def pprodEquivProd : PProd α β ≃ α × β where
toFun x := (x.1, x.2)
invFun x := ⟨x.1, x.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ => rfl
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod Equiv.pprodEquivProd
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProd_apply
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProd_symm_apply
/-- Product of two equivalences, in terms of `PProd`. If `α ≃ β` and `γ ≃ δ`, then
`PProd α γ ≃ PProd β δ`. -/
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 this had `@[congr]`
@[simps apply]
def pprodCongr (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : γ ≃ δ) : PProd α γ ≃ PProd β δ where
toFun x := ⟨e₁ x.1, e₂ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨e₁.symm x.1, e₂.symm x.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp
right_inv := fun ⟨x, y⟩ => by simp
#align equiv.pprod_congr Equiv.pprodCongr
#align equiv.pprod_congr_apply Equiv.pprodCongr_apply
/-- Combine two equivalences using `PProd` in the domain and `Prod` in the codomain. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def pprodProd (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
PProd α₁ β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
(ea.pprodCongr eb).trans pprodEquivProd
#align equiv.pprod_prod Equiv.pprodProd
#align equiv.pprod_prod_apply Equiv.pprodProd_apply
#align equiv.pprod_prod_symm_apply Equiv.pprodProd_symm_apply
/-- Combine two equivalences using `PProd` in the codomain and `Prod` in the domain. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def prodPProd (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
α₁ × β₁ ≃ PProd α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.symm.pprodProd eb.symm).symm
#align equiv.prod_pprod Equiv.prodPProd
#align equiv.prod_pprod_symm_apply Equiv.prodPProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.prod_pprod_apply Equiv.prodPProd_apply
/-- `PProd α β` is equivalent to `PLift α × PLift β` -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def pprodEquivProdPLift : PProd α β ≃ PLift α × PLift β :=
Equiv.plift.symm.pprodProd Equiv.plift.symm
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift_symm_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift_symm_apply
#align equiv.pprod_equiv_prod_plift_apply Equiv.pprodEquivProdPLift_apply
/-- Product of two equivalences. If `α₁ ≃ α₂` and `β₁ ≃ β₂`, then `α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂`. This is
`Prod.map` as an equivalence. -/
-- Porting note: in Lean 3 there was also a @[congr] tag
@[simps (config := .asFn) apply]
def prodCongr (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ :=
⟨Prod.map e₁ e₂, Prod.map e₁.symm e₂.symm, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp⟩
#align equiv.prod_congr Equiv.prodCongr
#align equiv.prod_congr_apply Equiv.prodCongr_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodCongr_symm (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
(prodCongr e₁ e₂).symm = prodCongr e₁.symm e₂.symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_symm Equiv.prodCongr_symm
/-- Type product is commutative up to an equivalence: `α × β ≃ β × α`. This is `Prod.swap` as an
equivalence. -/
def prodComm (α β) : α × β ≃ β × α :=
⟨Prod.swap, Prod.swap, Prod.swap_swap, Prod.swap_swap⟩
#align equiv.prod_comm Equiv.prodComm
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodComm (α β) : (⇑(prodComm α β) : α × β → β × α) = Prod.swap :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_prod_comm Equiv.coe_prodComm
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_apply (x : α × β) : prodComm α β x = x.swap :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_comm_apply Equiv.prodComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_symm (α β) : (prodComm α β).symm = prodComm β α :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_comm_symm Equiv.prodComm_symm
/-- Type product is associative up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def prodAssoc (α β γ) : (α × β) × γ ≃ α × β × γ :=
⟨fun p => (p.1.1, p.1.2, p.2), fun p => ((p.1, p.2.1), p.2.2), fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ => rfl,
fun ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.prod_assoc Equiv.prodAssoc
#align equiv.prod_assoc_symm_apply Equiv.prodAssoc_symm_apply
#align equiv.prod_assoc_apply Equiv.prodAssoc_apply
/-- Four-way commutativity of `prod`. The name matches `mul_mul_mul_comm`. -/
@[simps apply]
def prodProdProdComm (α β γ δ : Type*) : (α × β) × γ × δ ≃ (α × γ) × β × δ where
toFun abcd := ((abcd.1.1, abcd.2.1), (abcd.1.2, abcd.2.2))
invFun acbd := ((acbd.1.1, acbd.2.1), (acbd.1.2, acbd.2.2))
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨_a, _b⟩, ⟨_c, _d⟩⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_a, _c⟩, ⟨_b, _d⟩⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.prod_prod_prod_comm Equiv.prodProdProdComm
@[simp]
theorem prodProdProdComm_symm (α β γ δ : Type*) :
(prodProdProdComm α β γ δ).symm = prodProdProdComm α γ β δ :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_prod_prod_comm_symm Equiv.prodProdProdComm_symm
/-- `γ`-valued functions on `α × β` are equivalent to functions `α → β → γ`. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def curry (α β γ) : (α × β → γ) ≃ (α → β → γ) where
toFun := Function.curry
invFun := uncurry
left_inv := uncurry_curry
right_inv := curry_uncurry
#align equiv.curry Equiv.curry
#align equiv.curry_symm_apply Equiv.curry_symm_apply
#align equiv.curry_apply Equiv.curry_apply
section
/-- `PUnit` is a right identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def prodPUnit (α) : α × PUnit ≃ α :=
⟨fun p => p.1, fun a => (a, PUnit.unit), fun ⟨_, PUnit.unit⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.prod_punit Equiv.prodPUnit
#align equiv.prod_punit_apply Equiv.prodPUnit_apply
#align equiv.prod_punit_symm_apply Equiv.prodPUnit_symm_apply
/-- `PUnit` is a left identity for type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps!]
def punitProd (α) : PUnit × α ≃ α :=
calc
PUnit × α ≃ α × PUnit := prodComm _ _
_ ≃ α := prodPUnit _
#align equiv.punit_prod Equiv.punitProd
#align equiv.punit_prod_symm_apply Equiv.punitProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.punit_prod_apply Equiv.punitProd_apply
/-- `PUnit` is a right identity for dependent type product up to an equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaPUnit (α) : (_ : α) × PUnit ≃ α :=
⟨fun p => p.1, fun a => ⟨a, PUnit.unit⟩, fun ⟨_, PUnit.unit⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
/-- Any `Unique` type is a right identity for type product up to equivalence. -/
def prodUnique (α β) [Unique β] : α × β ≃ α :=
((Equiv.refl α).prodCongr <| equivPUnit.{_,1} β).trans <| prodPUnit α
#align equiv.prod_unique Equiv.prodUnique
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodUnique [Unique β] : (⇑(prodUnique α β) : α × β → α) = Prod.fst :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_prod_unique Equiv.coe_prodUnique
theorem prodUnique_apply [Unique β] (x : α × β) : prodUnique α β x = x.1 :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_unique_apply Equiv.prodUnique_apply
@[simp]
theorem prodUnique_symm_apply [Unique β] (x : α) :
(prodUnique α β).symm x = (x, default) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_unique_symm_apply Equiv.prodUnique_symm_apply
/-- Any `Unique` type is a left identity for type product up to equivalence. -/
def uniqueProd (α β) [Unique β] : β × α ≃ α :=
((equivPUnit.{_,1} β).prodCongr <| Equiv.refl α).trans <| punitProd α
#align equiv.unique_prod Equiv.uniqueProd
@[simp]
theorem coe_uniqueProd [Unique β] : (⇑(uniqueProd α β) : β × α → α) = Prod.snd :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_unique_prod Equiv.coe_uniqueProd
theorem uniqueProd_apply [Unique β] (x : β × α) : uniqueProd α β x = x.2 :=
rfl
#align equiv.unique_prod_apply Equiv.uniqueProd_apply
@[simp]
theorem uniqueProd_symm_apply [Unique β] (x : α) :
(uniqueProd α β).symm x = (default, x) :=
rfl
#align equiv.unique_prod_symm_apply Equiv.uniqueProd_symm_apply
/-- Any family of `Unique` types is a right identity for dependent type product up to
equivalence. -/
def sigmaUnique (α) (β : α → Type*) [∀ a, Unique (β a)] : (a : α) × (β a) ≃ α :=
(Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun a ↦ equivPUnit.{_,1} (β a)).trans <| sigmaPUnit α
@[simp]
theorem coe_sigmaUnique {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] :
(⇑(sigmaUnique α β) : (a : α) × (β a) → α) = Sigma.fst :=
rfl
theorem sigmaUnique_apply {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] (x : (a : α) × β a) :
sigmaUnique α β x = x.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sigmaUnique_symm_apply {β : α → Type*} [∀ a, Unique (β a)] (x : α) :
(sigmaUnique α β).symm x = ⟨x, default⟩ :=
rfl
/-- `Empty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prodEmpty (α) : α × Empty ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.prod_empty Equiv.prodEmpty
/-- `Empty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def emptyProd (α) : Empty × α ≃ Empty :=
equivEmpty _
#align equiv.empty_prod Equiv.emptyProd
/-- `PEmpty` type is a right absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def prodPEmpty (α) : α × PEmpty ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.prod_pempty Equiv.prodPEmpty
/-- `PEmpty` type is a left absorbing element for type product up to an equivalence. -/
def pemptyProd (α) : PEmpty × α ≃ PEmpty :=
equivPEmpty _
#align equiv.pempty_prod Equiv.pemptyProd
end
section
open Sum
/-- `PSum` is equivalent to `Sum`. -/
def psumEquivSum (α β) : PSum α β ≃ Sum α β where
toFun s := PSum.casesOn s inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim PSum.inl PSum.inr
left_inv s := by cases s <;> rfl
right_inv s := by cases s <;> rfl
#align equiv.psum_equiv_sum Equiv.psumEquivSum
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `α ⊕ β ≃ α' ⊕ β'`. This is `Sum.map` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps apply]
def sumCongr (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) : Sum α₁ β₁ ≃ Sum α₂ β₂ :=
⟨Sum.map ea eb, Sum.map ea.symm eb.symm, fun x => by simp, fun x => by simp⟩
#align equiv.sum_congr Equiv.sumCongr
#align equiv.sum_congr_apply Equiv.sumCongr_apply
/-- If `α ≃ α'` and `β ≃ β'`, then `PSum α β ≃ PSum α' β'`. -/
def psumCongr (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : γ ≃ δ) : PSum α γ ≃ PSum β δ where
toFun x := PSum.casesOn x (PSum.inl ∘ e₁) (PSum.inr ∘ e₂)
invFun x := PSum.casesOn x (PSum.inl ∘ e₁.symm) (PSum.inr ∘ e₂.symm)
left_inv := by rintro (x | x) <;> simp
right_inv := by rintro (x | x) <;> simp
#align equiv.psum_congr Equiv.psumCongr
/-- Combine two `Equiv`s using `PSum` in the domain and `Sum` in the codomain. -/
def psumSum (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
PSum α₁ β₁ ≃ Sum α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.psumCongr eb).trans (psumEquivSum _ _)
#align equiv.psum_sum Equiv.psumSum
/-- Combine two `Equiv`s using `Sum` in the domain and `PSum` in the codomain. -/
def sumPSum (ea : α₁ ≃ α₂) (eb : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
Sum α₁ β₁ ≃ PSum α₂ β₂ :=
(ea.symm.psumSum eb.symm).symm
#align equiv.sum_psum Equiv.sumPSum
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_trans (e : α₁ ≃ β₁) (f : α₂ ≃ β₂) (g : β₁ ≃ γ₁) (h : β₂ ≃ γ₂) :
(Equiv.sumCongr e f).trans (Equiv.sumCongr g h) = Equiv.sumCongr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) := by
ext i
cases i <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_trans Equiv.sumCongr_trans
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_symm (e : α ≃ β) (f : γ ≃ δ) :
(Equiv.sumCongr e f).symm = Equiv.sumCongr e.symm f.symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_symm Equiv.sumCongr_symm
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_refl : Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (Sum α β) := by
ext i
cases i <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_congr_refl Equiv.sumCongr_refl
/-- A subtype of a sum is equivalent to a sum of subtypes. -/
def subtypeSum {p : α ⊕ β → Prop} : {c // p c} ≃ {a // p (Sum.inl a)} ⊕ {b // p (Sum.inr b)} where
toFun c := match h : c.1 with
| Sum.inl a => Sum.inl ⟨a, h ▸ c.2⟩
| Sum.inr b => Sum.inr ⟨b, h ▸ c.2⟩
invFun c := match c with
| Sum.inl a => ⟨Sum.inl a, a.2⟩
| Sum.inr b => ⟨Sum.inr b, b.2⟩
left_inv := by rintro ⟨a | b, h⟩ <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (a | b) <;> rfl
namespace Perm
/-- Combine a permutation of `α` and of `β` into a permutation of `α ⊕ β`. -/
abbrev sumCongr (ea : Equiv.Perm α) (eb : Equiv.Perm β) : Equiv.Perm (Sum α β) :=
Equiv.sumCongr ea eb
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr Equiv.Perm.sumCongr
@[simp]
theorem sumCongr_apply (ea : Equiv.Perm α) (eb : Equiv.Perm β) (x : Sum α β) :
sumCongr ea eb x = Sum.map (⇑ea) (⇑eb) x :=
Equiv.sumCongr_apply ea eb x
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_apply Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_apply
-- Porting note: it seems the general theorem about `Equiv` is now applied, so there's no need
-- to have this version also have `@[simp]`. Similarly for below.
theorem sumCongr_trans (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : Equiv.Perm β) (g : Equiv.Perm α)
(h : Equiv.Perm β) : (sumCongr e f).trans (sumCongr g h) = sumCongr (e.trans g) (f.trans h) :=
Equiv.sumCongr_trans e f g h
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_trans Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_trans
theorem sumCongr_symm (e : Equiv.Perm α) (f : Equiv.Perm β) :
(sumCongr e f).symm = sumCongr e.symm f.symm :=
Equiv.sumCongr_symm e f
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_symm Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_symm
theorem sumCongr_refl : sumCongr (Equiv.refl α) (Equiv.refl β) = Equiv.refl (Sum α β) :=
Equiv.sumCongr_refl
#align equiv.perm.sum_congr_refl Equiv.Perm.sumCongr_refl
end Perm
/-- `Bool` is equivalent the sum of two `PUnit`s. -/
def boolEquivPUnitSumPUnit : Bool ≃ Sum PUnit.{u + 1} PUnit.{v + 1} :=
⟨fun b => b.casesOn (inl PUnit.unit) (inr PUnit.unit) , Sum.elim (fun _ => false) fun _ => true,
fun b => by cases b <;> rfl, fun s => by rcases s with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.bool_equiv_punit_sum_punit Equiv.boolEquivPUnitSumPUnit
/-- Sum of types is commutative up to an equivalence. This is `Sum.swap` as an equivalence. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn) apply]
def sumComm (α β) : Sum α β ≃ Sum β α :=
⟨Sum.swap, Sum.swap, Sum.swap_swap, Sum.swap_swap⟩
#align equiv.sum_comm Equiv.sumComm
#align equiv.sum_comm_apply Equiv.sumComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumComm_symm (α β) : (sumComm α β).symm = sumComm β α :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_comm_symm Equiv.sumComm_symm
/-- Sum of types is associative up to an equivalence. -/
def sumAssoc (α β γ) : Sum (Sum α β) γ ≃ Sum α (Sum β γ) :=
⟨Sum.elim (Sum.elim Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inl)) (Sum.inr ∘ Sum.inr),
Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inl) <| Sum.elim (Sum.inl ∘ Sum.inr) Sum.inr,
by rintro (⟨_ | _⟩ | _) <;> rfl, by
rintro (_ | ⟨_ | _⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_assoc Equiv.sumAssoc
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl (a) : sumAssoc α β γ (inl (inl a)) = inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inl_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr (b) : sumAssoc α β γ (inl (inr b)) = inr (inl b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inl_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_apply_inr (c) : sumAssoc α β γ (inr c) = inr (inr c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_apply_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inl {α β γ} (a) : (sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inl a) = inl (inl a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inl {α β γ} (b) :
(sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inr (inl b)) = inl (inr b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inr_inl Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inr {α β γ} (c) : (sumAssoc α β γ).symm (inr (inr c)) = inr c :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_assoc_symm_apply_inr_inr Equiv.sumAssoc_symm_apply_inr_inr
/-- Sum with `IsEmpty` is equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps symm_apply]
def sumEmpty (α β) [IsEmpty β] : Sum α β ≃ α where
toFun := Sum.elim id isEmptyElim
invFun := inl
left_inv s := by
rcases s with (_ | x)
· rfl
· exact isEmptyElim x
right_inv _ := rfl
#align equiv.sum_empty Equiv.sumEmpty
#align equiv.sum_empty_symm_apply Equiv.sumEmpty_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem sumEmpty_apply_inl [IsEmpty β] (a : α) : sumEmpty α β (Sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_empty_apply_inl Equiv.sumEmpty_apply_inl
/-- The sum of `IsEmpty` with any type is equivalent to that type. -/
@[simps! symm_apply]
def emptySum (α β) [IsEmpty α] : Sum α β ≃ β :=
(sumComm _ _).trans <| sumEmpty _ _
#align equiv.empty_sum Equiv.emptySum
#align equiv.empty_sum_symm_apply Equiv.emptySum_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem emptySum_apply_inr [IsEmpty α] (b : β) : emptySum α β (Sum.inr b) = b :=
rfl
#align equiv.empty_sum_apply_inr Equiv.emptySum_apply_inr
/-- `Option α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ PUnit` -/
def optionEquivSumPUnit (α) : Option α ≃ Sum α PUnit :=
⟨fun o => o.elim (inr PUnit.unit) inl, fun s => s.elim some fun _ => none,
fun o => by cases o <;> rfl,
fun s => by rcases s with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_none : optionEquivSumPUnit α none = Sum.inr PUnit.unit :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_none Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_none
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_some (a) : optionEquivSumPUnit α (some a) = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_some Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_some
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_coe (a : α) : optionEquivSumPUnit α a = Sum.inl a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_coe Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_coe
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inl (a) : (optionEquivSumPUnit α).symm (Sum.inl a) = a :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inl Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inl
@[simp]
theorem optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inr (a) : (optionEquivSumPUnit α).symm (Sum.inr a) = none :=
rfl
#align equiv.option_equiv_sum_punit_symm_inr Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit_symm_inr
/-- The set of `x : Option α` such that `isSome x` is equivalent to `α`. -/
@[simps]
def optionIsSomeEquiv (α) : { x : Option α // x.isSome } ≃ α where
toFun o := Option.get _ o.2
invFun x := ⟨some x, rfl⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.eq <| Option.some_get _
right_inv _ := Option.get_some _ _
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv_apply Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv_apply
#align equiv.option_is_some_equiv_symm_apply_coe Equiv.optionIsSomeEquiv_symm_apply_coe
/-- The product over `Option α` of `β a` is the binary product of the
product over `α` of `β (some α)` and `β none` -/
@[simps]
def piOptionEquivProd {β : Option α → Type*} :
(∀ a : Option α, β a) ≃ β none × ∀ a : α, β (some a) where
toFun f := (f none, fun a => f (some a))
invFun x a := Option.casesOn a x.fst x.snd
left_inv f := funext fun a => by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv x := by simp
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod Equiv.piOptionEquivProd
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.piOptionEquivProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.pi_option_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.piOptionEquivProd_apply
/-- `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to a `Sigma`-type over `Bool`. Note that this definition assumes `α` and
`β` to be types from the same universe, so it cannot be used directly to transfer theorems about
sigma types to theorems about sum types. In many cases one can use `ULift` to work around this
difficulty. -/
def sumEquivSigmaBool (α β : Type u) : Sum α β ≃ Σ b : Bool, b.casesOn α β :=
⟨fun s => s.elim (fun x => ⟨false, x⟩) fun x => ⟨true, x⟩, fun s =>
match s with
| ⟨false, a⟩ => inl a
| ⟨true, b⟩ => inr b,
fun s => by cases s <;> rfl, fun s => by rcases s with ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool Equiv.sumEquivSigmaBool
-- See also `Equiv.sigmaPreimageEquiv`.
/-- `sigmaFiberEquiv f` for `f : α → β` is the natural equivalence between
the type of all fibres of `f` and the total space `α`. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : (Σ y : β, { x // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => ↑x.2, fun x => ⟨f x, x, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_apply Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_apply
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_symm_apply_fst Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_symm_apply_fst
#align equiv.sigma_fiber_equiv_symm_apply_snd_coe Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv_symm_apply_snd_coe
/-- Inhabited types are equivalent to `Option β` for some `β` by identifying `default` with `none`.
-/
def sigmaEquivOptionOfInhabited (α : Type u) [Inhabited α] [DecidableEq α] :
Σ β : Type u, α ≃ Option β where
fst := {a // a ≠ default}
snd.toFun a := if h : a = default then none else some ⟨a, h⟩
snd.invFun := Option.elim' default (↑)
snd.left_inv a := by dsimp only; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
snd.right_inv
| none => by simp
| some ⟨a, ha⟩ => dif_neg ha
#align equiv.sigma_equiv_option_of_inhabited Equiv.sigmaEquivOptionOfInhabited
end
section sumCompl
/-- For any predicate `p` on `α`,
the sum of the two subtypes `{a // p a}` and its complement `{a // ¬ p a}`
is naturally equivalent to `α`.
See `subtypeOrEquiv` for sum types over subtypes `{x // p x}` and `{x // q x}`
that are not necessarily `IsCompl p q`. -/
def sumCompl {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
Sum { a // p a } { a // ¬p a } ≃ α where
toFun := Sum.elim Subtype.val Subtype.val
invFun a := if h : p a then Sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ else Sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩
left_inv := by
rintro (⟨x, hx⟩ | ⟨x, hx⟩) <;> dsimp
· rw [dif_pos]
· rw [dif_neg]
right_inv a := by
dsimp
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl Equiv.sumCompl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inl (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : { a // p a }) :
sumCompl p (Sum.inl x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_inl Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_inr (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x : { a // ¬p a }) :
sumCompl p (Sum.inr x) = x :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_inr Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inr
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_symm_of_pos (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) (h : p a) :
(sumCompl p).symm a = Sum.inl ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_symm_of_pos Equiv.sumCompl_apply_symm_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem sumCompl_apply_symm_of_neg (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
(sumCompl p).symm a = Sum.inr ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align equiv.sum_compl_apply_symm_of_neg Equiv.sumCompl_apply_symm_of_neg
/-- Combines an `Equiv` between two subtypes with an `Equiv` between their complements to form a
permutation. -/
def subtypeCongr {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x }) (f : { x // ¬p x } ≃ { x // ¬q x }) : Perm α :=
(sumCompl p).symm.trans ((sumCongr e f).trans (sumCompl q))
#align equiv.subtype_congr Equiv.subtypeCongr
variable {p : ε → Prop} [DecidablePred p]
variable (ep ep' : Perm { a // p a }) (en en' : Perm { a // ¬p a })
/-- Combining permutations on `ε` that permute only inside or outside the subtype
split induced by `p : ε → Prop` constructs a permutation on `ε`. -/
def Perm.subtypeCongr : Equiv.Perm ε :=
permCongr (sumCompl p) (sumCongr ep en)
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.apply (a : ε) : ep.subtypeCongr en a =
if h : p a then (ep ⟨a, h⟩ : ε) else en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [Perm.subtypeCongr, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply {a : ε} (h : p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.left_apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype (a : { a // p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = ep a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply ep en a.property
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.left_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.left_apply_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply {a : ε} (h : ¬p a) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en ⟨a, h⟩ := by
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.right_apply Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype (a : { a // ¬p a }) : ep.subtypeCongr en a = en a :=
Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply ep en a.property
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.right_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.right_apply_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.refl :
Perm.subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl { a // p a }) (Equiv.refl { a // ¬p a }) = Equiv.refl ε := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x <;> simp [h]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.refl Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.refl
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.symm : (ep.subtypeCongr en).symm = Perm.subtypeCongr ep.symm en.symm := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x
· have : p (ep.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
· have : ¬p (en.symm ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en.symm _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.symm Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.symm
@[simp]
theorem Perm.subtypeCongr.trans :
(ep.subtypeCongr en).trans (ep'.subtypeCongr en')
= Perm.subtypeCongr (ep.trans ep') (en.trans en') := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x
· have : p (ep ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property _
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, this]
· have : ¬p (en ⟨x, h⟩) := Subtype.property (en _)
simp [Perm.subtypeCongr.apply, h, symm_apply_eq, this]
#align equiv.perm.subtype_congr.trans Equiv.Perm.subtypeCongr.trans
end sumCompl
section subtypePreimage
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (x₀ : { a // p a } → β)
/-- For a fixed function `x₀ : {a // p a} → β` defined on a subtype of `α`,
the subtype of functions `x : α → β` that agree with `x₀` on the subtype `{a // p a}`
is naturally equivalent to the type of functions `{a // ¬ p a} → β`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypePreimage : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ } ≃ ({ a // ¬p a } → β) where
toFun (x : { x : α → β // x ∘ Subtype.val = x₀ }) a := (x : α → β) a
invFun x := ⟨fun a => if h : p a then x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ else x ⟨a, h⟩, funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ => dif_pos h⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
Subtype.val_injective <|
funext fun a => by
dsimp only
split_ifs
· rw [← hx]; rfl
· rfl
right_inv x :=
funext fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
show dite (p a) _ _ = _ by
dsimp only
rw [dif_neg h]
#align equiv.subtype_preimage Equiv.subtypePreimage
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_apply Equiv.subtypePreimage_apply
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x₀ ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_pos Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_pos
theorem subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg (x : { a // ¬p a } → β) (a : α) (h : ¬p a) :
((subtypePreimage p x₀).symm x : α → β) a = x ⟨a, h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align equiv.subtype_preimage_symm_apply_coe_neg Equiv.subtypePreimage_symm_apply_coe_neg
end subtypePreimage
section
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a` generates an equivalence between `∀ a, β₁ a` and
`∀ a, β₂ a`. -/
def piCongrRight {β₁ β₂ : α → Sort*} (F : ∀ a, β₁ a ≃ β₂ a) : (∀ a, β₁ a) ≃ (∀ a, β₂ a) :=
⟨fun H a => F a (H a), fun H a => (F a).symm (H a), fun H => funext <| by simp,
fun H => funext <| by simp⟩
#align equiv.Pi_congr_right Equiv.piCongrRight
/-- Given `φ : α → β → Sort*`, we have an equivalence between `∀ a b, φ a b` and `∀ b a, φ a b`.
This is `Function.swap` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def piComm (φ : α → β → Sort*) : (∀ a b, φ a b) ≃ ∀ b a, φ a b :=
⟨swap, swap, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.Pi_comm Equiv.piComm
#align equiv.Pi_comm_apply Equiv.piComm_apply
@[simp]
theorem piComm_symm {φ : α → β → Sort*} : (piComm φ).symm = (piComm <| swap φ) :=
rfl
#align equiv.Pi_comm_symm Equiv.piComm_symm
/-- Dependent `curry` equivalence: the type of dependent functions on `Σ i, β i` is equivalent
to the type of dependent functions of two arguments (i.e., functions to the space of functions).
This is `Sigma.curry` and `Sigma.uncurry` together as an equiv. -/
def piCurry {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) :
(∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) ≃ ∀ a b, γ a b where
toFun := Sigma.curry
invFun := Sigma.uncurry
left_inv := Sigma.uncurry_curry
right_inv := Sigma.curry_uncurry
#align equiv.Pi_curry Equiv.piCurry
-- `simps` overapplies these but `simps (config := .asFn)` under-applies them
@[simp] theorem piCurry_apply {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*)
(f : ∀ x : Σ i, β i, γ x.1 x.2) :
piCurry γ f = Sigma.curry f :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem piCurry_symm_apply {β : α → Type*} (γ : ∀ a, β a → Type*) (f : ∀ a b, γ a b) :
(piCurry γ).symm f = Sigma.uncurry f :=
rfl
end
section prodCongr
variable (e : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂)
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `β₁ × α₁` and `β₂ × α₁`. -/
def prodCongrLeft : β₁ × α₁ ≃ β₂ × α₁ where
toFun ab := ⟨e ab.2 ab.1, ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨(e ab.2).symm ab.1, ab.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_left Equiv.prodCongrLeft
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrLeft_apply (b : β₁) (a : α₁) : prodCongrLeft e (b, a) = (e a b, a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_left_apply Equiv.prodCongrLeft_apply
theorem prodCongr_refl_right (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prodCongr e (Equiv.refl α₁) = prodCongrLeft fun _ => e := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_refl_right Equiv.prodCongr_refl_right
/-- A family of equivalences `∀ (a : α₁), β₁ ≃ β₂` generates an equivalence
between `α₁ × β₁` and `α₁ × β₂`. -/
def prodCongrRight : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₁ × β₂ where
toFun ab := ⟨ab.1, e ab.1 ab.2⟩
invFun ab := ⟨ab.1, (e ab.1).symm ab.2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_right Equiv.prodCongrRight
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrRight_apply (a : α₁) (b : β₁) : prodCongrRight e (a, b) = (a, e a b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_congr_right_apply Equiv.prodCongrRight_apply
theorem prodCongr_refl_left (e : β₁ ≃ β₂) :
prodCongr (Equiv.refl α₁) e = prodCongrRight fun _ => e := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_refl_left Equiv.prodCongr_refl_left
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrLeft_trans_prodComm :
(prodCongrLeft e).trans (prodComm _ _) = (prodComm _ _).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_left_trans_prod_comm Equiv.prodCongrLeft_trans_prodComm
@[simp]
theorem prodCongrRight_trans_prodComm :
(prodCongrRight e).trans (prodComm _ _) = (prodComm _ _).trans (prodCongrLeft e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.prod_congr_right_trans_prod_comm Equiv.prodCongrRight_trans_prodComm
theorem sigmaCongrRight_sigmaEquivProd :
(sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂)
= (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).trans (prodCongrRight e) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp
#align equiv.sigma_congr_right_sigma_equiv_prod Equiv.sigmaCongrRight_sigmaEquivProd
theorem sigmaEquivProd_sigmaCongrRight :
(sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₁).symm.trans (sigmaCongrRight e)
= (prodCongrRight e).trans (sigmaEquivProd α₁ β₂).symm := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩ : 1
simp only [trans_apply, sigmaCongrRight_apply, prodCongrRight_apply]
rfl
#align equiv.sigma_equiv_prod_sigma_congr_right Equiv.sigmaEquivProd_sigmaCongrRight
-- See also `Equiv.ofPreimageEquiv`.
/-- A family of equivalences between fibers gives an equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps!]
def ofFiberEquiv {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} (e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) : α ≃ β :=
(sigmaFiberEquiv f).symm.trans <| (Equiv.sigmaCongrRight e).trans (sigmaFiberEquiv g)
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv Equiv.ofFiberEquiv
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_apply Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_apply
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_symm_apply
theorem ofFiberEquiv_map {α β γ} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ}
(e : ∀ c, { a // f a = c } ≃ { b // g b = c }) (a : α) : g (ofFiberEquiv e a) = f a :=
(_ : { b // g b = _ }).property
#align equiv.of_fiber_equiv_map Equiv.ofFiberEquiv_map
/-- A variation on `Equiv.prodCongr` where the equivalence in the second component can depend
on the first component. A typical example is a shear mapping, explaining the name of this
declaration. -/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def prodShear (e₁ : α₁ ≃ α₂) (e₂ : α₁ → β₁ ≃ β₂) : α₁ × β₁ ≃ α₂ × β₂ where
toFun := fun x : α₁ × β₁ => (e₁ x.1, e₂ x.1 x.2)
invFun := fun y : α₂ × β₂ => (e₁.symm y.1, (e₂ <| e₁.symm y.1).symm y.2)
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩
simp only [symm_apply_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x₁, y₁⟩
simp only [apply_symm_apply]
#align equiv.prod_shear Equiv.prodShear
#align equiv.prod_shear_apply Equiv.prodShear_apply
#align equiv.prod_shear_symm_apply Equiv.prodShear_symm_apply
end prodCongr
namespace Perm
variable [DecidableEq α₁] (a : α₁) (e : Perm β₁)
/-- `prodExtendRight a e` extends `e : Perm β` to `Perm (α × β)` by sending `(a, b)` to
`(a, e b)` and keeping the other `(a', b)` fixed. -/
def prodExtendRight : Perm (α₁ × β₁) where
toFun ab := if ab.fst = a then (a, e ab.snd) else ab
invFun ab := if ab.fst = a then (a, e.symm ab.snd) else ab
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨k', x⟩
dsimp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· simp at h₂
· simp
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨k', x⟩
dsimp only
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· simp [h₁]
· simp at h₂
· simp
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight
@[simp]
theorem prodExtendRight_apply_eq (b : β₁) : prodExtendRight a e (a, b) = (a, e b) :=
if_pos rfl
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right_apply_eq Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight_apply_eq
theorem prodExtendRight_apply_ne {a a' : α₁} (h : a' ≠ a) (b : β₁) :
prodExtendRight a e (a', b) = (a', b) :=
if_neg h
#align equiv.perm.prod_extend_right_apply_ne Equiv.Perm.prodExtendRight_apply_ne
theorem eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne {e : Perm β₁} {a a' : α₁} {b : β₁}
(h : prodExtendRight a e (a', b) ≠ (a', b)) : a' = a := by
contrapose! h
exact prodExtendRight_apply_ne _ h _
#align equiv.perm.eq_of_prod_extend_right_ne Equiv.Perm.eq_of_prodExtendRight_ne
@[simp]
theorem fst_prodExtendRight (ab : α₁ × β₁) : (prodExtendRight a e ab).fst = ab.fst := by
rw [prodExtendRight]
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
· rfl
#align equiv.perm.fst_prod_extend_right Equiv.Perm.fst_prodExtendRight
end Perm
section
/-- The type of functions to a product `α × β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
`γ → α` and `γ → β`. -/
def arrowProdEquivProdArrow (α β γ : Type*) : (γ → α × β) ≃ (γ → α) × (γ → β) where
toFun := fun f => (fun c => (f c).1, fun c => (f c).2)
invFun := fun p c => (p.1 c, p.2 c)
left_inv := fun f => rfl
right_inv := fun p => by cases p; rfl
#align equiv.arrow_prod_equiv_prod_arrow Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow
open Sum
/-- The type of dependent functions on a sum type `ι ⊕ ι'` is equivalent to the type of pairs of
functions on `ι` and on `ι'`. This is a dependent version of `Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow`. -/
@[simps]
def sumPiEquivProdPi (π : ι ⊕ ι' → Type*) : (∀ i, π i) ≃ (∀ i, π (inl i)) × ∀ i', π (inr i') where
toFun f := ⟨fun i => f (inl i), fun i' => f (inr i')⟩
invFun g := Sum.rec g.1 g.2
left_inv f := by ext (i | i) <;> rfl
right_inv g := Prod.ext rfl rfl
/-- The equivalence between a product of two dependent functions types and a single dependent
function type. Basically a symmetric version of `Equiv.sumPiEquivProdPi`. -/
@[simps!]
def prodPiEquivSumPi (π : ι → Type u) (π' : ι' → Type u) :
((∀ i, π i) × ∀ i', π' i') ≃ ∀ i, Sum.elim π π' i :=
sumPiEquivProdPi (Sum.elim π π') |>.symm
/-- The type of functions on a sum type `α ⊕ β` is equivalent to the type of pairs of functions
on `α` and on `β`. -/
def sumArrowEquivProdArrow (α β γ : Type*) : (Sum α β → γ) ≃ (α → γ) × (β → γ) :=
⟨fun f => (f ∘ inl, f ∘ inr), fun p => Sum.elim p.1 p.2, fun f => by ext ⟨⟩ <;> rfl, fun p => by
cases p
rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_fst (f : Sum α β → γ) (a : α) :
(sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ f).1 a = f (inl a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_apply_fst Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_fst
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_snd (f : Sum α β → γ) (b : β) :
(sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ f).2 b = f (inr b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_apply_snd Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_apply_snd
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inl (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) (a : α) :
((sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ).symm (f, g)) (inl a) = f a :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inl Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inl
@[simp]
theorem sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inr (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) (b : β) :
((sumArrowEquivProdArrow α β γ).symm (f, g)) (inr b) = g b :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_arrow_equiv_prod_arrow_symm_apply_inr Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow_symm_apply_inr
/-- Type product is right distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def sumProdDistrib (α β γ) : Sum α β × γ ≃ Sum (α × γ) (β × γ) :=
⟨fun p => p.1.map (fun x => (x, p.2)) fun x => (x, p.2),
fun s => s.elim (Prod.map inl id) (Prod.map inr id), by
rintro ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl, by rintro (⟨_, _⟩ | ⟨_, _⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib Equiv.sumProdDistrib
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_apply_left (a : α) (c : γ) :
sumProdDistrib α β γ (Sum.inl a, c) = Sum.inl (a, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_apply_left Equiv.sumProdDistrib_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_apply_right (b : β) (c : γ) :
sumProdDistrib α β γ (Sum.inr b, c) = Sum.inr (b, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_apply_right Equiv.sumProdDistrib_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_left (a : α × γ) :
(sumProdDistrib α β γ).symm (inl a) = (inl a.1, a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_symm_apply_left Equiv.sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_right (b : β × γ) :
(sumProdDistrib α β γ).symm (inr b) = (inr b.1, b.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.sum_prod_distrib_symm_apply_right Equiv.sumProdDistrib_symm_apply_right
/-- Type product is left distributive with respect to type sum up to an equivalence. -/
def prodSumDistrib (α β γ) : α × Sum β γ ≃ Sum (α × β) (α × γ) :=
calc
α × Sum β γ ≃ Sum β γ × α := prodComm _ _
_ ≃ Sum (β × α) (γ × α) := sumProdDistrib _ _ _
_ ≃ Sum (α × β) (α × γ) := sumCongr (prodComm _ _) (prodComm _ _)
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib Equiv.prodSumDistrib
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_apply_left (a : α) (b : β) :
prodSumDistrib α β γ (a, Sum.inl b) = Sum.inl (a, b) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_apply_left Equiv.prodSumDistrib_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_apply_right (a : α) (c : γ) :
prodSumDistrib α β γ (a, Sum.inr c) = Sum.inr (a, c) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_apply_right Equiv.prodSumDistrib_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_left (a : α × β) :
(prodSumDistrib α β γ).symm (inl a) = (a.1, inl a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_symm_apply_left Equiv.prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_right (a : α × γ) :
(prodSumDistrib α β γ).symm (inr a) = (a.1, inr a.2) :=
rfl
#align equiv.prod_sum_distrib_symm_apply_right Equiv.prodSumDistrib_symm_apply_right
/-- An indexed sum of disjoint sums of types is equivalent to the sum of the indexed sums. -/
@[simps]
def sigmaSumDistrib (α β : ι → Type*) :
(Σ i, Sum (α i) (β i)) ≃ Sum (Σ i, α i) (Σ i, β i) :=
⟨fun p => p.2.map (Sigma.mk p.1) (Sigma.mk p.1),
Sum.elim (Sigma.map id fun _ => Sum.inl) (Sigma.map id fun _ => Sum.inr), fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨i, a | b⟩ <;> rfl, fun p => by rcases p with (⟨i, a⟩ | ⟨i, b⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib_apply Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib_apply
#align equiv.sigma_sum_distrib_symm_apply Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib_symm_apply
/-- The product of an indexed sum of types (formally, a `Sigma`-type `Σ i, α i`) by a type `β` is
equivalent to the sum of products `Σ i, (α i × β)`. -/
def sigmaProdDistrib (α : ι → Type*) (β : Type*) : (Σ i, α i) × β ≃ Σ i, α i × β :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, (p.1.2, p.2)⟩, fun p => (⟨p.1, p.2.1⟩, p.2.2), fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩
rfl, fun p => by
rcases p with ⟨_, ⟨_, _⟩⟩
rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_prod_distrib Equiv.sigmaProdDistrib
/-- An equivalence that separates out the 0th fiber of `(Σ (n : ℕ), f n)`. -/
def sigmaNatSucc (f : ℕ → Type u) : (Σ n, f n) ≃ Sum (f 0) (Σ n, f (n + 1)) :=
⟨fun x =>
@Sigma.casesOn ℕ f (fun _ => Sum (f 0) (Σn, f (n + 1))) x fun n =>
@Nat.casesOn (fun i => f i → Sum (f 0) (Σn : ℕ, f (n + 1))) n (fun x : f 0 => Sum.inl x)
fun (n : ℕ) (x : f n.succ) => Sum.inr ⟨n, x⟩,
Sum.elim (Sigma.mk 0) (Sigma.map Nat.succ fun _ => id), by rintro ⟨n | n, x⟩ <;> rfl, by
rintro (x | ⟨n, x⟩) <;> rfl⟩
#align equiv.sigma_nat_succ Equiv.sigmaNatSucc
/-- The product `Bool × α` is equivalent to `α ⊕ α`. -/
@[simps]
def boolProdEquivSum (α) : Bool × α ≃ Sum α α where
toFun p := p.1.casesOn (inl p.2) (inr p.2)
invFun := Sum.elim (Prod.mk false) (Prod.mk true)
left_inv := by rintro ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum Equiv.boolProdEquivSum
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum_apply Equiv.boolProdEquivSum_apply
#align equiv.bool_prod_equiv_sum_symm_apply Equiv.boolProdEquivSum_symm_apply
/-- The function type `Bool → α` is equivalent to `α × α`. -/
@[simps]
def boolArrowEquivProd (α) : (Bool → α) ≃ α × α where
toFun f := (f false, f true)
invFun p b := b.casesOn p.1 p.2
left_inv _ := funext <| Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
right_inv := fun _ => rfl
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod_apply Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd_apply
#align equiv.bool_arrow_equiv_prod_symm_apply Equiv.boolArrowEquivProd_symm_apply
end
section
open Sum Nat
/-- The set of natural numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ PUnit`. -/
def natEquivNatSumPUnit : ℕ ≃ Sum ℕ PUnit where
toFun n := Nat.casesOn n (inr PUnit.unit) inl
invFun := Sum.elim Nat.succ fun _ => 0
left_inv n := by cases n <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (_ | _) <;> rfl
#align equiv.nat_equiv_nat_sum_punit Equiv.natEquivNatSumPUnit
/-- `ℕ ⊕ PUnit` is equivalent to `ℕ`. -/
def natSumPUnitEquivNat : Sum ℕ PUnit ≃ ℕ :=
natEquivNatSumPUnit.symm
#align equiv.nat_sum_punit_equiv_nat Equiv.natSumPUnitEquivNat
/-- The type of integer numbers is equivalent to `ℕ ⊕ ℕ`. -/
def intEquivNatSumNat : ℤ ≃ Sum ℕ ℕ where
toFun z := Int.casesOn z inl inr
invFun := Sum.elim Int.ofNat Int.negSucc
left_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
right_inv := by rintro (m | n) <;> rfl
#align equiv.int_equiv_nat_sum_nat Equiv.intEquivNatSumNat
end
/-- An equivalence between `α` and `β` generates an equivalence between `List α` and `List β`. -/
def listEquivOfEquiv (e : α ≃ β) : List α ≃ List β where
toFun := List.map e
invFun := List.map e.symm
left_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.symm_comp_self, List.map_id]
right_inv l := by rw [List.map_map, e.self_comp_symm, List.map_id]
#align equiv.list_equiv_of_equiv Equiv.listEquivOfEquiv
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `Unique α` is equivalent to `Unique β`. -/
def uniqueCongr (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α ≃ Unique β where
toFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e.symm
invFun h := @Equiv.unique _ _ h e
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align equiv.unique_congr Equiv.uniqueCongr
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β`, then `IsEmpty α` is equivalent to `IsEmpty β`. -/
theorem isEmpty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : IsEmpty α ↔ IsEmpty β :=
⟨fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e.symm, fun h => @Function.isEmpty _ _ h e⟩
#align equiv.is_empty_congr Equiv.isEmpty_congr
protected theorem isEmpty (e : α ≃ β) [IsEmpty β] : IsEmpty α :=
e.isEmpty_congr.mpr ‹_›
#align equiv.is_empty Equiv.isEmpty
section
open Subtype
/-- If `α` is equivalent to `β` and the predicates `p : α → Prop` and `q : β → Prop` are equivalent
at corresponding points, then `{a // p a}` is equivalent to `{b // q b}`.
For the statement where `α = β`, that is, `e : perm α`, see `Perm.subtypePerm`. -/
def subtypeEquiv {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // q b } where
toFun a := ⟨e a, (h _).mp a.property⟩
invFun b := ⟨e.symm b, (h _).mpr ((e.apply_symm_apply b).symm ▸ b.property)⟩
left_inv a := Subtype.ext <| by simp
right_inv b := Subtype.ext <| by simp
#align equiv.subtype_equiv Equiv.subtypeEquiv
lemma coe_subtypeEquiv_eq_map {X Y : Type*} {p : X → Prop} {q : Y → Prop} (e : X ≃ Y)
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (e x)) : ⇑(e.subtypeEquiv h) = Subtype.map e (h · |>.mp) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_refl {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ p (Equiv.refl _ a) := fun a => Iff.rfl) :
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv h = Equiv.refl { a : α // p a } := by
ext
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_refl Equiv.subtypeEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_symm {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).symm =
e.symm.subtypeEquiv fun a => by
convert (h <| e.symm a).symm
exact (e.apply_symm_apply a).symm :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_symm Equiv.subtypeEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_trans {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) (f : β ≃ γ)
(h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (h' : ∀ b : β, q b ↔ r (f b)) :
(e.subtypeEquiv h).trans (f.subtypeEquiv h')
= (e.trans f).subtypeEquiv fun a => (h a).trans (h' <| e a) :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_trans Equiv.subtypeEquiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquiv_apply {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(e : α ≃ β) (h : ∀ a : α, p a ↔ q (e a)) (x : { x // p x }) :
e.subtypeEquiv h x = ⟨e x, (h _).1 x.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_apply Equiv.subtypeEquiv_apply
/-- If two predicates `p` and `q` are pointwise equivalent, then `{x // p x}` is equivalent to
`{x // q x}`. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeEquivRight {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x) : { x // p x } ≃ { x // q x } :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl _) e
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right Equiv.subtypeEquivRight
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeEquivRight_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_right_symm_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply_coe
lemma subtypeEquivRight_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // p x }) : subtypeEquivRight e z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mp z.2⟩ := rfl
lemma subtypeEquivRight_symm_apply {p q : α → Prop} (e : ∀ x, p x ↔ q x)
(z : { x // q x }) : (subtypeEquivRight e).symm z = ⟨z, (e z.1).mpr z.2⟩ := rfl
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : β → Prop` the subtype `{a // p (e a)}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p b}`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype {p : β → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) : { a : α // p (e a) } ≃ { b : β // p b } :=
subtypeEquiv e <| by simp
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype Equiv.subtypeEquivOfSubtype
/-- If `α ≃ β`, then for any predicate `p : α → Prop` the subtype `{a // p a}` is equivalent
to the subtype `{b // p (e.symm b)}`. This version is used by `equiv_rw`. -/
def subtypeEquivOfSubtype' {p : α → Prop} (e : α ≃ β) :
{ a : α // p a } ≃ { b : β // p (e.symm b) } :=
e.symm.subtypeEquivOfSubtype.symm
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_of_subtype' Equiv.subtypeEquivOfSubtype'
/-- If two predicates are equal, then the corresponding subtypes are equivalent. -/
def subtypeEquivProp {p q : α → Prop} (h : p = q) : Subtype p ≃ Subtype q :=
subtypeEquiv (Equiv.refl α) fun _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_prop Equiv.subtypeEquivProp
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. This
version allows the “inner” predicate to depend on `h : p a`. -/
@[simps]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists (p : α → Prop) (q : Subtype p → Prop) :
Subtype q ≃ { a : α // ∃ h : p a, q ⟨a, h⟩ } :=
⟨fun a =>
⟨a.1, a.1.2, by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a, hap⟩, haq⟩
exact haq⟩,
fun a => ⟨⟨a, a.2.fst⟩, a.2.snd⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, h⟩ => rfl, fun ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists_symm_apply_coe_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_exists_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists_apply_coe
/-- A subtype of a subtype is equivalent to the subtype of elements satisfying both predicates. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter {α : Type u} (p q : α → Prop) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists p _).trans <|
subtypeEquivRight fun x => @exists_prop (q x) (p x)
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_inter_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter_symm_apply_coe_coe
/-- If the outer subtype has more restrictive predicate than the inner one,
then we can drop the latter. -/
@[simps!]
def subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ {x}, q x → p x) :
{ x : Subtype p // q x.1 } ≃ Subtype q :=
(subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeInter p _).trans <| subtypeEquivRight fun _ => and_iff_right_of_imp h
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_apply_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype_apply_coe
#align equiv.subtype_subtype_equiv_subtype_symm_apply_coe_coe Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype_symm_apply_coe_coe
/-- If a proposition holds for all elements, then the subtype is
equivalent to the original type. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def subtypeUnivEquiv {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) : Subtype p ≃ α :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => ⟨x, h x⟩, fun _ => Subtype.eq rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv_apply Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv_apply
#align equiv.subtype_univ_equiv_symm_apply Equiv.subtypeUnivEquiv_symm_apply
/-- A subtype of a sigma-type is a sigma-type over a subtype. -/
def subtypeSigmaEquiv (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) : { y : Sigma p // q y.1 } ≃ Σ x :
Subtype q, p x.1 :=
⟨fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩, fun _ => rfl,
fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.subtype_sigma_equiv Equiv.subtypeSigmaEquiv
/-- A sigma type over a subtype is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty outside of the subset -/
def sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset (p : α → Type v) (q : α → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
(Σ x : Subtype q, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p x :=
(subtypeSigmaEquiv p q).symm.trans <| subtypeUnivEquiv fun x => h x.1 x.2
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_equiv_of_subset Equiv.sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset
/-- If a predicate `p : β → Prop` is true on the range of a map `f : α → β`, then
`Σ y : {y // p y}, {x // f x = y}` is equivalent to `α`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (p : β → Prop) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
(Σ y : Subtype p, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ α :=
calc
_ ≃ Σy : β, { x : α // f x = y } := sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ p fun _ ⟨x, h'⟩ => h' ▸ h x
_ ≃ α := sigmaFiberEquiv f
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_fiber_equiv Equiv.sigmaSubtypeFiberEquiv
/-- If for each `x` we have `p x ↔ q (f x)`, then `Σ y : {y // q y}, f ⁻¹' {y}` is equivalent
to `{x // p x}`. -/
def sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop}
(h : ∀ x, p x ↔ q (f x)) : (Σ y : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Subtype p :=
calc
(Σy : Subtype q, { x : α // f x = y }) ≃ Σy :
Subtype q, { x : Subtype p // Subtype.mk (f x) ((h x).1 x.2) = y } := by {
apply sigmaCongrRight
intro y
apply Equiv.symm
refine (subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtypeExists _ _).trans (subtypeEquivRight ?_)
intro x
exact ⟨fun ⟨hp, h'⟩ => congr_arg Subtype.val h', fun h' => ⟨(h x).2 (h'.symm ▸ y.2),
Subtype.eq h'⟩⟩ }
_ ≃ Subtype p := sigmaFiberEquiv fun x : Subtype p => (⟨f x, (h x).1 x.property⟩ : Subtype q)
#align equiv.sigma_subtype_fiber_equiv_subtype Equiv.sigmaSubtypeFiberEquivSubtype
/-- A sigma type over an `Option` is equivalent to the sigma set over the original type,
if the fiber is empty at none. -/
def sigmaOptionEquivOfSome (p : Option α → Type v) (h : p none → False) :
(Σ x : Option α, p x) ≃ Σ x : α, p (some x) :=
haveI h' : ∀ x, p x → x.isSome := by
intro x
cases x
· intro n
exfalso
exact h n
· intro _
exact rfl
(sigmaSubtypeEquivOfSubset _ _ h').symm.trans (sigmaCongrLeft' (optionIsSomeEquiv α))
#align equiv.sigma_option_equiv_of_some Equiv.sigmaOptionEquivOfSome
/-- The `Pi`-type `∀ i, π i` is equivalent to the type of sections `f : ι → Σ i, π i` of the
`Sigma` type such that for all `i` we have `(f i).fst = i`. -/
def piEquivSubtypeSigma (ι) (π : ι → Type*) :
(∀ i, π i) ≃ { f : ι → Σ i, π i // ∀ i, (f i).1 = i } where
toFun := fun f => ⟨fun i => ⟨i, f i⟩, fun i => rfl⟩
invFun := fun f i => by rw [← f.2 i]; exact (f.1 i).2
left_inv := fun f => funext fun i => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
Subtype.eq <| funext fun i =>
Sigma.eq (hf i).symm <| eq_of_heq <| rec_heq_of_heq _ <| by simp
#align equiv.pi_equiv_subtype_sigma Equiv.piEquivSubtypeSigma
/-- The type of functions `f : ∀ a, β a` such that for all `a` we have `p a (f a)` is equivalent
to the type of functions `∀ a, {b : β a // p a b}`. -/
def subtypePiEquivPi {β : α → Sort v} {p : ∀ a, β a → Prop} :
{ f : ∀ a, β a // ∀ a, p a (f a) } ≃ ∀ a, { b : β a // p a b } where
toFun := fun f a => ⟨f.1 a, f.2 a⟩
invFun := fun f => ⟨fun a => (f a).1, fun a => (f a).2⟩
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, h⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro f
funext a
exact Subtype.ext_val rfl
#align equiv.subtype_pi_equiv_pi Equiv.subtypePiEquivPi
/-- A subtype of a product defined by componentwise conditions
is equivalent to a product of subtypes. -/
def subtypeProdEquivProd {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
{ c : α × β // p c.1 ∧ q c.2 } ≃ { a // p a } × { b // q b } where
toFun := fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩
invFun := fun x => ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2.1⟩, ⟨x.1.2, x.2.2⟩⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_prod_equiv_prod Equiv.subtypeProdEquivProd
/-- A subtype of a `Prod` that depends only on the first component is equivalent to the
corresponding subtype of the first type times the second type. -/
def prodSubtypeFstEquivSubtypeProd {p : α → Prop} : {s : α × β // p s.1} ≃ {a // p a} × β where
toFun x := ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1.1, x.2⟩, x.1.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
/-- A subtype of a `Prod` is equivalent to a sigma type whose fibers are subtypes. -/
def subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype (p : α → β → Prop) :
{ x : α × β // p x.1 x.2 } ≃ Σa, { b : β // p a b } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.1, x.1.2, x.property⟩
invFun x := ⟨⟨x.1, x.2⟩, x.2.property⟩
left_inv x := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨a, b, pab⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_prod_equiv_sigma_subtype Equiv.subtypeProdEquivSigmaSubtype
/-- The type `∀ (i : α), β i` can be split as a product by separating the indices in `α`
depending on whether they satisfy a predicate `p` or not. -/
@[simps]
def piEquivPiSubtypeProd {α : Type*} (p : α → Prop) (β : α → Type*) [DecidablePred p] :
(∀ i : α, β i) ≃ (∀ i : { x // p x }, β i) × ∀ i : { x // ¬p x }, β i where
toFun f := (fun x => f x, fun x => f x)
invFun f x := if h : p x then f.1 ⟨x, h⟩ else f.2 ⟨x, h⟩
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f, g⟩
ext1 <;>
· ext y
rcases y with ⟨val, property⟩
simp only [property, dif_pos, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
left_inv f := by
ext x
by_cases h:p x <;>
· simp only [h, dif_neg, dif_pos, not_false_iff]
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_symm_apply Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd_symm_apply
#align equiv.pi_equiv_pi_subtype_prod_apply Equiv.piEquivPiSubtypeProd_apply
/-- A product of types can be split as the binary product of one of the types and the product
of all the remaining types. -/
@[simps]
def piSplitAt {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (β : α → Type*) :
(∀ j, β j) ≃ β i × ∀ j : { j // j ≠ i }, β j where
toFun f := ⟨f i, fun j => f j⟩
invFun f j := if h : j = i then h.symm.rec f.1 else f.2 ⟨j, h⟩
right_inv f := by
ext x
exacts [dif_pos rfl, (dif_neg x.2).trans (by cases x; rfl)]
left_inv f := by
ext x
dsimp only
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rfl
· rfl
#align equiv.pi_split_at Equiv.piSplitAt
#align equiv.pi_split_at_apply Equiv.piSplitAt_apply
#align equiv.pi_split_at_symm_apply Equiv.piSplitAt_symm_apply
/-- A product of copies of a type can be split as the binary product of one copy and the product
of all the remaining copies. -/
@[simps!]
def funSplitAt {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (i : α) (β : Type*) :
(α → β) ≃ β × ({ j // j ≠ i } → β) :=
piSplitAt i _
#align equiv.fun_split_at Equiv.funSplitAt
#align equiv.fun_split_at_symm_apply Equiv.funSplitAt_symm_apply
#align equiv.fun_split_at_apply Equiv.funSplitAt_apply
end
section subtypeEquivCodomain
variable [DecidableEq X] {x : X}
/-- The type of all functions `X → Y` with prescribed values for all `x' ≠ x`
is equivalent to the codomain `Y`. -/
def subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
{ g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } ≃ Y :=
(subtypePreimage _ f).trans <|
@funUnique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } _ <|
show Unique { x' // ¬x' ≠ x } from
@Equiv.unique _ _
(show Unique { x' // x' = x } from {
default := ⟨x, rfl⟩, uniq := fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h })
(subtypeEquivRight fun _ => not_not)
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain
@[simp]
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
(subtypeEquivCodomain f : _ → Y) =
fun g : { g : X → Y // g ∘ (↑) = f } => (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_subtype_equiv_codomain Equiv.coe_subtypeEquivCodomain
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (g) :
subtypeEquivCodomain f g = (g : X → Y) x :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_apply Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_apply
theorem coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm : Y → _) = fun y =>
⟨fun x' => if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y, by
funext x'
simp only [ne_eq, dite_not, comp_apply, Subtype.coe_eta, dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro w
exfalso
exact x'.property w⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_subtype_equiv_codomain_symm Equiv.coe_subtypeEquivCodomain_symm
@[simp]
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = if h : x' ≠ x then f ⟨x', h⟩ else y :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq (f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x = y :=
dif_neg (not_not.mpr rfl)
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_eq Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq
theorem subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
(f : { x' // x' ≠ x } → Y) (y : Y) (x' : X) (h : x' ≠ x) :
((subtypeEquivCodomain f).symm y : X → Y) x' = f ⟨x', h⟩ :=
dif_pos h
#align equiv.subtype_equiv_codomain_symm_apply_ne Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne
end subtypeEquivCodomain
instance : CanLift (α → β) (α ≃ β) (↑) Bijective where prf f hf := ⟨ofBijective f hf, rfl⟩
section
variable {α' β' : Type*} (e : Perm α') {p : β' → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (f : α' ≃ Subtype p)
/-- Extend the domain of `e : Equiv.Perm α` to one that is over `β` via `f : α → Subtype p`,
where `p : β → Prop`, permuting only the `b : β` that satisfy `p b`.
This can be used to extend the domain across a function `f : α → β`,
keeping everything outside of `Set.range f` fixed. For this use-case `Equiv` given by `f` can
be constructed by `Equiv.of_leftInverse'` or `Equiv.of_leftInverse` when there is a known
inverse, or `Equiv.ofInjective` in the general case.
-/
def Perm.extendDomain : Perm β' :=
(permCongr f e).subtypeCongr (Equiv.refl _)
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain Equiv.Perm.extendDomain
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_image (a : α') : e.extendDomain f (f a) = f (e a) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_image Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_image
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype {b : β'} (h : p b) :
e.extendDomain f b = f (e (f.symm ⟨b, h⟩)) := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_subtype Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_subtype
theorem Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype {b : β'} (h : ¬p b) : e.extendDomain f b = b := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, h]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_apply_not_subtype Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_apply_not_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_refl : Perm.extendDomain (Equiv.refl _) f = Equiv.refl _ := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_refl Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_refl
@[simp]
theorem Perm.extendDomain_symm : (e.extendDomain f).symm = Perm.extendDomain e.symm f :=
rfl
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_symm Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_symm
theorem Perm.extendDomain_trans (e e' : Perm α') :
(e.extendDomain f).trans (e'.extendDomain f) = Perm.extendDomain (e.trans e') f := by
simp [Perm.extendDomain, permCongr_trans]
#align equiv.perm.extend_domain_trans Equiv.Perm.extendDomain_trans
end
/-- Subtype of the quotient is equivalent to the quotient of the subtype. Let `α` be a setoid with
equivalence relation `~`. Let `p₂` be a predicate on the quotient type `α/~`, and `p₁` be the lift
of this predicate to `α`: `p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧`. Let `~₂` be the restriction of `~` to `{x // p₁ x}`.
Then `{x // p₂ x}` is equivalent to the quotient of `{x // p₁ x}` by `~₂`. -/
def subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype (p₁ : α → Prop) {s₁ : Setoid α} {s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)}
(p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, s₂.r x y ↔ s₁.r x y) : {x // p₂ x} ≃ Quotient s₂ where
toFun a :=
Quotient.hrecOn a.1 (fun a h => ⟦⟨a, (hp₂ _).2 h⟩⟧)
(fun a b hab => hfunext (by rw [Quotient.sound hab]) fun h₁ h₂ _ =>
heq_of_eq (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).2 hab)))
a.2
invFun a :=
Quotient.liftOn a (fun a => (⟨⟦a.1⟧, (hp₂ _).1 a.2⟩ : { x // p₂ x })) fun a b hab =>
Subtype.ext_val (Quotient.sound ((h _ _).1 hab))
left_inv := by exact fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn a (fun b hb => rfl) ha
right_inv a := Quotient.inductionOn a fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, @Setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y)
(x hx) : subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h ⟨⟦x⟧, hx⟩ = ⟦⟨x, (hp₂ _).2 hx⟩⟧ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype_mk Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_mk
@[simp]
theorem subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk (p₁ : α → Prop)
[s₁ : Setoid α] [s₂ : Setoid (Subtype p₁)] (p₂ : Quotient s₁ → Prop) (hp₂ : ∀ a, p₁ a ↔ p₂ ⟦a⟧)
(h : ∀ x y : Subtype p₁, @Setoid.r _ s₂ x y ↔ (x : α) ≈ y) (x) :
(subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype p₁ p₂ hp₂ h).symm ⟦x⟧ = ⟨⟦x⟧, (hp₂ _).1 x.property⟩ :=
rfl
#align equiv.subtype_quotient_equiv_quotient_subtype_symm_mk Equiv.subtypeQuotientEquivQuotientSubtype_symm_mk
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- A helper function for `Equiv.swap`. -/
def swapCore (a b r : α) : α :=
if r = a then b else if r = b then a else r
#align equiv.swap_core Equiv.swapCore
theorem swapCore_self (r a : α) : swapCore a a r = r := by
unfold swapCore
split_ifs <;> simp [*]
#align equiv.swap_core_self Equiv.swapCore_self
theorem swapCore_swapCore (r a b : α) : swapCore a b (swapCore a b r) = r := by
unfold swapCore
-- Porting note: cc missing.
-- `casesm` would work here, with `casesm _ = _, ¬ _ = _`,
-- if it would just continue past failures on hypotheses matching the pattern
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ h₅
· subst h₁; exact h₂
· subst h₁; rfl
· cases h₃ rfl
· exact h₄.symm
· cases h₅ rfl
· cases h₅ rfl
· rfl
#align equiv.swap_core_swap_core Equiv.swapCore_swapCore
theorem swapCore_comm (r a b : α) : swapCore a b r = swapCore b a r := by
unfold swapCore
-- Porting note: whatever solution works for `swapCore_swapCore` will work here too.
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ <;> try simp
· cases h₁; cases h₂; rfl
#align equiv.swap_core_comm Equiv.swapCore_comm
/-- `swap a b` is the permutation that swaps `a` and `b` and
leaves other values as is. -/
def swap (a b : α) : Perm α :=
⟨swapCore a b, swapCore a b, fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b,
fun r => swapCore_swapCore r a b⟩
#align equiv.swap Equiv.swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_self (a : α) : swap a a = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun r => swapCore_self r a
#align equiv.swap_self Equiv.swap_self
theorem swap_comm (a b : α) : swap a b = swap b a :=
ext fun r => swapCore_comm r _ _
#align equiv.swap_comm Equiv.swap_comm
theorem swap_apply_def (a b x : α) : swap a b x = if x = a then b else if x = b then a else x :=
rfl
#align equiv.swap_apply_def Equiv.swap_apply_def
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_left (a b : α) : swap a b a = b :=
if_pos rfl
#align equiv.swap_apply_left Equiv.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem swap_apply_right (a b : α) : swap a b b = a := by
by_cases h:b = a <;> simp [swap_apply_def, h]
#align equiv.swap_apply_right Equiv.swap_apply_right
theorem swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne {a b x : α} : x ≠ a → x ≠ b → swap a b x = x := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [swap_apply_def]
#align equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne Equiv.swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne
theorem eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self {a b x : α} (h : swap a b x ≠ x) : x = a ∨ x = b := by
contrapose! h
exact swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne h.1 h.2
@[simp]
theorem swap_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).trans (swap a b) = Equiv.refl _ :=
ext fun _ => swapCore_swapCore _ _ _
#align equiv.swap_swap Equiv.swap_swap
@[simp]
theorem symm_swap (a b : α) : (swap a b).symm = swap a b :=
rfl
#align equiv.symm_swap Equiv.symm_swap
@[simp]
theorem swap_eq_refl_iff {x y : α} : swap x y = Equiv.refl _ ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => (Equiv.refl _).injective ?_, fun h => h ▸ swap_self _⟩
rw [← h, swap_apply_left, h, refl_apply]
#align equiv.swap_eq_refl_iff Equiv.swap_eq_refl_iff
theorem swap_comp_apply {a b x : α} (π : Perm α) :
π.trans (swap a b) x = if π x = a then b else if π x = b then a else π x := by
cases π
rfl
#align equiv.swap_comp_apply Equiv.swap_comp_apply
theorem swap_eq_update (i j : α) : (Equiv.swap i j : α → α) = update (update id j i) i j :=
funext fun x => by rw [update_apply _ i j, update_apply _ j i, Equiv.swap_apply_def, id]
#align equiv.swap_eq_update Equiv.swap_eq_update
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Basic.lean | 1,695 | 1,697 | theorem comp_swap_eq_update (i j : α) (f : α → β) :
f ∘ Equiv.swap i j = update (update f j (f i)) i (f j) := by |
rw [swap_eq_update, comp_update, comp_update, comp_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
#align_import dynamics.circle.rotation_number.translation_number from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open scoped Classical
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift extends ℝ →o ℝ : Type where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
#align circle_deg1_lift CircleDeg1Lift
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mk CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mk
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
#align circle_deg1_lift.monotone CircleDeg1Lift.monotone
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
#align circle_deg1_lift.mono CircleDeg1Lift.mono
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
#align circle_deg1_lift.strict_mono_iff_injective CircleDeg1Lift.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_one
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_one_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_one_add
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.coe_inj -- Use `DFunLike.coe_inj`
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext CircleDeg1Lift.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext_iff CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one f := rfl
one_mul f := rfl
mul_assoc f₁ f₂ f₃ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mul CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_apply CircleDeg1Lift.mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_one CircleDeg1Lift.coe_one
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_has_coe_to_fun CircleDeg1Lift.unitsHasCoeToFun
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.units_coe -- now LHS = RHS
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_inv_apply_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_inv_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_apply_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_apply_inv_apply
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' f g := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_symm CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_inv CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_inv
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.is_unit_iff_bijective CircleDeg1Lift.isUnit_iff_bijective
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_pow CircleDeg1Lift.coe_pow
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.semiconj_by_iff_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.semiconjBy_iff_semiconj
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_iff_commute CircleDeg1Lift.commute_iff_commute
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => Multiplicative.toAdd x + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate CircleDeg1Lift.translate
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_inv_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_pow
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_iterate CircleDeg1Lift.translate_iterate
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_nat_add
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_nat
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_nat
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_int
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_int_add
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_add
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_int
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_nat_add
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_nat
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_of_map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq CircleDeg1Lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
-/
/-- Monotone circle maps form a lattice with respect to the pointwise order -/
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm f₁ f₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf f₁ f₂ f₃ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.sup_apply CircleDeg1Lift.sup_apply
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.inf_apply CircleDeg1Lift.inf_apply
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_monotone
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_mono CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_mono
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_mono CircleDeg1Lift.pow_mono
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.pow_monotone
/-!
### Estimates on `(f * g) 0`
We prove the estimates `f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉` and some corollaries with added/removed
floors and ceils.
We also prove that for two semiconjugate maps `g₁`, `g₂`, the distance between `g₁ 0` and `g₂ 0`
is less than two.
-/
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_le_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_le_of_map_zero
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_le
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.floor_map_map_zero_le
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_lt
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_of_map_zero
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_map_zero
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_floor_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_floor_map_map_zero
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_map_zero
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy
/-!
### Limits at infinities and continuity
-/
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_bot CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atBot
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_top CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atTop
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.continuous_iff_surjective CircleDeg1Lift.continuous_iff_surjective
/-!
### Estimates on `(f^n) x`
If we know that `f x` is `≤`/`<`/`≥`/`>`/`=` to `x + m`, then we have a similar estimate on
`f^[n] x` and `x + n * m`.
For `≤`, `≥`, and `=` we formulate both `of` (implication) and `iff` versions because implications
work for `n = 0`. For `<` and `>` we formulate only `iff` versions.
-/
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_le_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_le_iff
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff
theorem le_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x ↔ x + m ≤ f x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_lt_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_pos_iff
theorem lt_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m < f^[n] x ↔ x + m < f x := by
simpa only [not_le] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_le_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff
theorem mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero (n : ℕ) : ↑n * ⌊f 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f^[n] 0⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ← zero_add ((n : ℝ) * _)]
apply le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
simp [floor_le]
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero CircleDeg1Lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero
/-!
### Definition of translation number
-/
noncomputable section
/-- An auxiliary sequence used to define the translation number. -/
def transnumAuxSeq (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
(f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq
/-- The translation number of a `CircleDeg1Lift`, $τ(f)=\lim_{n→∞}\frac{f^n(x)-x}{n}$. We use
an auxiliary sequence `\frac{f^{2^n}(0)}{2^n}` to define `τ(f)` because some proofs are simpler
this way. -/
def translationNumber : ℝ :=
limUnder atTop f.transnumAuxSeq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber
end
-- TODO: choose two different symbols for `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber` and the future
-- `circle_mono_homeo.rotation_number`, then make them `localized notation`s
local notation "τ" => translationNumber
theorem transnumAuxSeq_def : f.transnumAuxSeq = fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_def CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_def
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux {τ' : ℝ} (h : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 τ')) :
τ f = τ' :=
h.limUnder_eq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto_aux CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n] 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <| by
simpa [(· ∘ ·), transnumAuxSeq_def, coe_pow] using
h.comp (Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀ CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n + 1] 0 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ <| (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast h)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀'
theorem transnumAuxSeq_zero : f.transnumAuxSeq 0 = f 0 := by simp [transnumAuxSeq]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_zero CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_zero
theorem transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt (n : ℕ) :
dist (f.transnumAuxSeq n) (f.transnumAuxSeq (n + 1)) < 1 / 2 / 2 ^ n := by
have : 0 < (2 ^ (n + 1) : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
rw [div_div, ← pow_succ', ← abs_of_pos this]
replace := abs_pos.2 (ne_of_gt this)
convert (div_lt_div_right this).2 ((f ^ 2 ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (f ^ 2 ^ n)) using 1
simp_rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq]
rw [← abs_div, sub_div, pow_succ, pow_succ', ← two_mul, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
pow_mul, sq, mul_apply]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_dist_lt CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_aux : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(cauchySeq_of_le_geometric_two 1 fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n).tendsto_limUnder
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
theorem dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le : dist (f 0) (τ f) ≤ 1 :=
f.transnumAuxSeq_zero ▸
dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ 1 (fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n)
f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux (x : ℕ → ℝ) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) (x n) ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => x (2 ^ n) / 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
apply f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.congr_dist (squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) _ _)
· exact fun n => C / 2 ^ n
· intro n
have : 0 < (2 ^ n : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
convert (div_le_div_right this).2 (H (2 ^ n)) using 1
rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq, ← sub_div, abs_div, abs_of_pos this, Real.dist_eq]
· exact mul_zero C ▸ tendsto_const_nhds.mul <| tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp <|
tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_of_dist_bounded_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) ((g ^ n) 0) ≤ C) : τ f = τ g :=
Eq.symm <| g.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <|
f.tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux _ C H
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_dist_bounded CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_one : τ 1 = 0 :=
translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ _ <| by simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_one CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_one
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (H : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
τ g₁ = τ g₂ :=
translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded 2 fun n =>
le_of_lt <| dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy <| H.pow_right n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift}
(H : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) : τ g₁ = τ g₂ :=
translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.2 H
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconj
theorem translationNumber_mul_of_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Commute f g) :
τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_
(f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.add g.tendsto_translationNumber_aux)
simp only [transnumAuxSeq, ← add_div]
refine (f * g).tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux
(fun n ↦ (f ^ n) 0 + (g ^ n) 0) 1 fun n ↦ ?_
rw [h.mul_pow, dist_comm]
exact le_of_lt ((f ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (g ^ n))
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_mul_of_commute CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_units_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : τ ↑f⁻¹ = -τ f :=
eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero.2 <| by
simp [← translationNumber_mul_of_commute (Commute.refl _).units_inv_left]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_units_inv CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, τ (f ^ n) = n * τ f
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, translationNumber_mul_of_commute (Commute.pow_self f n),
translationNumber_pow n, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, one_mul]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_pow
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_zpow (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ∀ n : ℤ, τ (f ^ n : Units _) = n * τ f
| (n : ℕ) => by simp [translationNumber_pow f n]
| -[n+1] => by simp; ring
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_conj_eq (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (g : CircleDeg1Lift) :
τ (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = τ g :=
(translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy (f.mk_semiconjBy g)).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_conj_eq CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_conj_eq
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_conj_eq' (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (g : CircleDeg1Lift) :
τ (↑f⁻¹ * g * f) = τ g :=
translationNumber_conj_eq f⁻¹ g
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_conj_eq' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_conj_eq'
theorem dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le (n : ℕ) :
dist ((f ^ n) 0) (n * f.translationNumber) ≤ 1 :=
f.translationNumber_pow n ▸ (f ^ n).dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le
theorem tendsto_translation_number₀' :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (n + 1) : CircleDeg1Lift) 0 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
refine
tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) (fun n => ?_)
((tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1).comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1))
dsimp
have : (0 : ℝ) < n + 1 := n.cast_add_one_pos
rw [Real.dist_eq, div_sub' _ _ _ (ne_of_gt this), abs_div, ← Real.dist_eq, abs_of_pos this,
Nat.cast_add_one, div_le_div_right this, ← Nat.cast_add_one]
apply dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number₀' CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number₀'
theorem tendsto_translation_number₀ : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (f ^ n) 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast f.tendsto_translation_number₀')
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number₀ CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number₀
/-- For any `x : ℝ` the sequence $\frac{f^n(x)-x}{n}$ tends to the translation number of `f`.
In particular, this limit does not depend on `x`. -/
theorem tendsto_translationNumber (x : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((f ^ n) x - x) / n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
rw [← translationNumber_conj_eq' (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)]
refine (tendsto_translation_number₀ _).congr fun n ↦ ?_
simp [sub_eq_neg_add, Units.conj_pow']
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber
theorem tendsto_translation_number' (x : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((f ^ (n + 1) : CircleDeg1Lift) x - x) / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
mod_cast (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (f.tendsto_translationNumber x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number' CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number'
theorem translationNumber_mono : Monotone τ := fun f g h =>
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' f.tendsto_translation_number₀ g.tendsto_translation_number₀ fun n => by
gcongr; exact pow_mono h _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_mono CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mono
theorem translationNumber_translate (x : ℝ) : τ (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x) = x :=
translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' _ <| by
simp only [translate_iterate, translate_apply, add_zero, Nat.cast_succ,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (M₀ := ℝ) _ (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), tendsto_const_nhds]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_translate CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_translate
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, f x ≤ x + z) : τ f ≤ z :=
translationNumber_translate z ▸ translationNumber_mono fun x => (hz x).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_le {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, x + z ≤ f x) : z ≤ τ f :=
translationNumber_translate z ▸ translationNumber_mono fun x => (add_comm _ _).trans_le (hz x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_le
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) : τ f ≤ m :=
le_of_tendsto' (f.tendsto_translation_number' x) fun n =>
(div_le_iff' (n.cast_add_one_pos : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr <| sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <|
(coe_pow f (n + 1)).symm ▸ @Nat.cast_add_one ℝ _ n ▸ f.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int h (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add_nat {x : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) : τ f ≤ m :=
@translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f x m h
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_nat
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) : ↑m ≤ τ f :=
ge_of_tendsto' (f.tendsto_translation_number' x) fun n =>
(le_div_iff (n.cast_add_one_pos : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr <| le_sub_iff_add_le'.2 <| by
simp only [coe_pow, mul_comm (m : ℝ), ← Nat.cast_add_one, f.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map h]
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_int_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_nat_le {x : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) : ↑m ≤ τ f :=
@le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f x m h
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_nat_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_nat_le
/-- If `f x - x` is an integer number `m` for some point `x`, then `τ f = m`.
On the circle this means that a map with a fixed point has rotation number zero. -/
theorem translationNumber_of_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) : τ f = m :=
le_antisymm (translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f <| le_of_eq h)
(le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f <| le_of_eq h.symm)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_of_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_of_eq_add_int
theorem floor_sub_le_translationNumber (x : ℝ) : ↑⌊f x - x⌋ ≤ τ f :=
le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f <| le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 (floor_le <| f x - x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_sub_le_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.floor_sub_le_translationNumber
theorem translationNumber_le_ceil_sub (x : ℝ) : τ f ≤ ⌈f x - x⌉ :=
translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f <| sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 (le_ceil <| f x - x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_ceil_sub CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_ceil_sub
theorem map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int {n : ℤ} (h : τ f < n) (x : ℝ) : f x < x + n :=
not_le.1 <| mt f.le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le <| not_le.2 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_of_translation_number_lt_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int
theorem map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_nat {n : ℕ} (h : τ f < n) (x : ℝ) : f x < x + n :=
@map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int f n h x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_of_translation_number_lt_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_nat
theorem map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one (x : ℝ) : f x < x + ⌊τ f⌋ + 1 := by
rw [add_assoc]
norm_cast
refine map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int _ ?_ _
push_cast
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_add_floor_translation_number_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one
theorem map_lt_add_translationNumber_add_one (x : ℝ) : f x < x + τ f + 1 :=
calc
f x < x + ⌊τ f⌋ + 1 := f.map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one x
_ ≤ x + τ f + 1 := by gcongr; apply floor_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_add_translation_number_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_add_translationNumber_add_one
theorem lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber {n : ℤ} (h : ↑n < τ f) (x : ℝ) : x + n < f x :=
not_le.1 <| mt f.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int <| not_le.2 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_of_int_lt_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber
theorem lt_map_of_nat_lt_translationNumber {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n < τ f) (x : ℝ) : x + n < f x :=
@lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber f n h x
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_of_nat_lt_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_of_nat_lt_translationNumber
/-- If `f^n x - x`, `n > 0`, is an integer number `m` for some point `x`, then
`τ f = m / n`. On the circle this means that a map with a periodic orbit has
a rational rotation number. -/
theorem translationNumber_of_map_pow_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} (h : (f ^ n) x = x + m)
(hn : 0 < n) : τ f = m / n := by
have := (f ^ n).translationNumber_of_eq_add_int h
rwa [translationNumber_pow, mul_comm, ← eq_div_iff] at this
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_of_map_pow_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_of_map_pow_eq_add_int
/-- If a predicate depends only on `f x - x` and holds for all `0 ≤ x ≤ 1`,
then it holds for all `x`. -/
theorem forall_map_sub_of_Icc (P : ℝ → Prop) (h : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, P (f x - x)) (x : ℝ) :
P (f x - x) :=
f.map_fract_sub_fract_eq x ▸ h _ ⟨fract_nonneg _, le_of_lt (fract_lt_one _)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.forall_map_sub_of_Icc CircleDeg1Lift.forall_map_sub_of_Icc
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 906 | 914 | theorem translationNumber_lt_of_forall_lt_add (hf : Continuous f) {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, f x < x + z) :
τ f < z := by |
obtain ⟨x, -, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, f y - y ≤ f x - x :=
isCompact_Icc.exists_isMaxOn (nonempty_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
(hf.sub continuous_id).continuousOn
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 <| hz x)
apply translationNumber_le_of_le_add
simp only [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact f.forall_map_sub_of_Icc (fun a => a ≤ f x - x) hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Baire.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Baire.CompleteMetrizable
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
#align_import analysis.normed_space.banach from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Banach open mapping theorem
This file contains the Banach open mapping theorem, i.e., the fact that a bijective
bounded linear map between Banach spaces has a bounded inverse.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Function Metric Set Filter Finset Topology NNReal
open LinearMap (range ker)
variable {𝕜 𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] {σ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜'}
{σ' : 𝕜' →+* 𝕜} [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ] [RingHomIsometric σ]
[RingHomIsometric σ']
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F] (f : E →SL[σ] F)
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
/-- A (possibly nonlinear) right inverse to a continuous linear map, which doesn't have to be
linear itself but which satisfies a bound `‖inverse x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. A surjective continuous linear
map doesn't always have a continuous linear right inverse, but it always has a nonlinear inverse
in this sense, by Banach's open mapping theorem. -/
structure NonlinearRightInverse where
toFun : F → E
nnnorm : ℝ≥0
bound' : ∀ y, ‖toFun y‖ ≤ nnnorm * ‖y‖
right_inv' : ∀ y, f (toFun y) = y
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse
instance : CoeFun (NonlinearRightInverse f) fun _ => F → E :=
⟨fun fsymm => fsymm.toFun⟩
@[simp]
theorem NonlinearRightInverse.right_inv {f : E →SL[σ] F} (fsymm : NonlinearRightInverse f) (y : F) :
f (fsymm y) = y :=
fsymm.right_inv' y
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse.right_inv ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse.right_inv
theorem NonlinearRightInverse.bound {f : E →SL[σ] F} (fsymm : NonlinearRightInverse f) (y : F) :
‖fsymm y‖ ≤ fsymm.nnnorm * ‖y‖ :=
fsymm.bound' y
#align continuous_linear_map.nonlinear_right_inverse.bound ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse.bound
end ContinuousLinearMap
/-- Given a continuous linear equivalence, the inverse is in particular an instance of
`ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse` (which turns out to be linear). -/
noncomputable def ContinuousLinearEquiv.toNonlinearRightInverse (f : E ≃SL[σ] F) :
ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse (f : E →SL[σ] F) where
toFun := f.invFun
nnnorm := ‖(f.symm : F →SL[σ'] E)‖₊
bound' _ := ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm (f.symm : F →SL[σ'] E) _
right_inv' := f.apply_symm_apply
#align continuous_linear_equiv.to_nonlinear_right_inverse ContinuousLinearEquiv.toNonlinearRightInverse
noncomputable instance (f : E ≃SL[σ] F) :
Inhabited (ContinuousLinearMap.NonlinearRightInverse (f : E →SL[σ] F)) :=
⟨f.toNonlinearRightInverse⟩
/-! ### Proof of the Banach open mapping theorem -/
variable [CompleteSpace F]
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
/-- First step of the proof of the Banach open mapping theorem (using completeness of `F`):
by Baire's theorem, there exists a ball in `E` whose image closure has nonempty interior.
Rescaling everything, it follows that any `y ∈ F` is arbitrarily well approached by
images of elements of norm at most `C * ‖y‖`.
For further use, we will only need such an element whose image
is within distance `‖y‖/2` of `y`, to apply an iterative process. -/
theorem exists_approx_preimage_norm_le (surj : Surjective f) :
∃ C ≥ 0, ∀ y, ∃ x, dist (f x) y ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ ∧ ‖x‖ ≤ C * ‖y‖ := by
have A : ⋃ n : ℕ, closure (f '' ball 0 n) = Set.univ := by
refine Subset.antisymm (subset_univ _) fun y _ => ?_
rcases surj y with ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases exists_nat_gt ‖x‖ with ⟨n, hn⟩
refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, subset_closure ?_⟩
refine (mem_image _ _ _).2 ⟨x, ⟨?_, hx⟩⟩
rwa [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero]
have : ∃ (n : ℕ) (x : _), x ∈ interior (closure (f '' ball 0 n)) :=
nonempty_interior_of_iUnion_of_closed (fun n => isClosed_closure) A
simp only [mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, Metric.mem_nhds_iff] at this
rcases this with ⟨n, a, ε, ⟨εpos, H⟩⟩
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine ⟨(ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * 2 * n, by positivity, fun y => ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with rfl | hy
· use 0
simp
· have hc' : 1 < ‖σ c‖ := by simp only [RingHomIsometric.is_iso, hc]
rcases rescale_to_shell hc' (half_pos εpos) hy with ⟨d, hd, ydlt, -, dinv⟩
let δ := ‖d‖ * ‖y‖ / 4
have δpos : 0 < δ := div_pos (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hd) (norm_pos_iff.2 hy)) (by norm_num)
have : a + d • y ∈ ball a ε := by
simp [dist_eq_norm, lt_of_le_of_lt ydlt.le (half_lt_self εpos)]
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 (H this) _ δpos with ⟨z₁, z₁im, h₁⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 z₁im with ⟨x₁, hx₁, xz₁⟩
rw [← xz₁] at h₁
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at hx₁
have : a ∈ ball a ε := by
simp only [mem_ball, dist_self]
exact εpos
rcases Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 (H this) _ δpos with ⟨z₂, z₂im, h₂⟩
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 z₂im with ⟨x₂, hx₂, xz₂⟩
rw [← xz₂] at h₂
rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm, sub_zero] at hx₂
let x := x₁ - x₂
have I : ‖f x - d • y‖ ≤ 2 * δ :=
calc
‖f x - d • y‖ = ‖f x₁ - (a + d • y) - (f x₂ - a)‖ := by
congr 1
simp only [f.map_sub]
abel
_ ≤ ‖f x₁ - (a + d • y)‖ + ‖f x₂ - a‖ := norm_sub_le _ _
_ ≤ δ + δ := by rw [dist_eq_norm'] at h₁ h₂; gcongr
_ = 2 * δ := (two_mul _).symm
have J : ‖f (σ' d⁻¹ • x) - y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖f (σ' d⁻¹ • x) - y‖ = ‖d⁻¹ • f x - (d⁻¹ * d) • y‖ := by
rwa [f.map_smulₛₗ _, inv_mul_cancel, one_smul, map_inv₀, map_inv₀,
RingHomCompTriple.comp_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
_ = ‖d⁻¹ • (f x - d • y)‖ := by rw [mul_smul, smul_sub]
_ = ‖d‖⁻¹ * ‖f x - d • y‖ := by rw [norm_smul, norm_inv]
_ ≤ ‖d‖⁻¹ * (2 * δ) := by gcongr
_ = ‖d‖⁻¹ * ‖d‖ * ‖y‖ / 2 := by
simp only [δ]
ring
_ = ‖y‖ / 2 := by
rw [inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
simp [norm_eq_zero, hd]
_ = 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ := by ring
rw [← dist_eq_norm] at J
have K : ‖σ' d⁻¹ • x‖ ≤ (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * 2 * ↑n * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖σ' d⁻¹ • x‖ = ‖d‖⁻¹ * ‖x₁ - x₂‖ := by rw [norm_smul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso, norm_inv]
_ ≤ (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * ‖y‖ * (n + n) := by
gcongr
· simpa using dinv
· exact le_trans (norm_sub_le _ _) (by gcongr)
_ = (ε / 2)⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * 2 * ↑n * ‖y‖ := by ring
exact ⟨σ' d⁻¹ • x, J, K⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.exists_approx_preimage_norm_le ContinuousLinearMap.exists_approx_preimage_norm_le
variable [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The Banach open mapping theorem: if a bounded linear map between Banach spaces is onto, then
any point has a preimage with controlled norm. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Banach.lean | 164 | 226 | theorem exists_preimage_norm_le (surj : Surjective f) :
∃ C > 0, ∀ y, ∃ x, f x = y ∧ ‖x‖ ≤ C * ‖y‖ := by |
obtain ⟨C, C0, hC⟩ := exists_approx_preimage_norm_le f surj
/- Second step of the proof: starting from `y`, we want an exact preimage of `y`. Let `g y` be
the approximate preimage of `y` given by the first step, and `h y = y - f(g y)` the part that
has no preimage yet. We will iterate this process, taking the approximate preimage of `h y`,
leaving only `h^2 y` without preimage yet, and so on. Let `u n` be the approximate preimage
of `h^n y`. Then `u` is a converging series, and by design the sum of the series is a
preimage of `y`. This uses completeness of `E`. -/
choose g hg using hC
let h y := y - f (g y)
have hle : ∀ y, ‖h y‖ ≤ 1 / 2 * ‖y‖ := by
intro y
rw [← dist_eq_norm, dist_comm]
exact (hg y).1
refine ⟨2 * C + 1, by linarith, fun y => ?_⟩
have hnle : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖h^[n] y‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n * ‖y‖ := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp only [one_div, Nat.zero_eq, one_mul, iterate_zero_apply, pow_zero, le_rfl]
· rw [iterate_succ']
apply le_trans (hle _) _
rw [pow_succ', mul_assoc]
gcongr
let u n := g (h^[n] y)
have ule : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ‖y‖) := fun n ↦ by
apply le_trans (hg _).2
calc
C * ‖h^[n] y‖ ≤ C * ((1 / 2) ^ n * ‖y‖) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hnle n) C0
_ = (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ‖y‖) := by ring
have sNu : Summable fun n => ‖u n‖ := by
refine .of_nonneg_of_le (fun n => norm_nonneg _) ule ?_
exact Summable.mul_right _ (summable_geometric_of_lt_one (by norm_num) (by norm_num))
have su : Summable u := sNu.of_norm
let x := tsum u
have x_ineq : ‖x‖ ≤ (2 * C + 1) * ‖y‖ :=
calc
‖x‖ ≤ ∑' n, ‖u n‖ := norm_tsum_le_tsum_norm sNu
_ ≤ ∑' n, (1 / 2) ^ n * (C * ‖y‖) :=
tsum_le_tsum ule sNu (Summable.mul_right _ summable_geometric_two)
_ = (∑' n, (1 / 2) ^ n) * (C * ‖y‖) := tsum_mul_right
_ = 2 * C * ‖y‖ := by rw [tsum_geometric_two, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ 2 * C * ‖y‖ + ‖y‖ := le_add_of_nonneg_right (norm_nonneg y)
_ = (2 * C + 1) * ‖y‖ := by ring
have fsumeq : ∀ n : ℕ, f (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, u i) = y - h^[n] y := by
intro n
induction' n with n IH
· simp [f.map_zero]
· rw [sum_range_succ, f.map_add, IH, iterate_succ_apply', sub_add]
have : Tendsto (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, u i) atTop (𝓝 x) := su.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat
have L₁ : Tendsto (fun n => f (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, u i)) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
(f.continuous.tendsto _).comp this
simp only [fsumeq] at L₁
have L₂ : Tendsto (fun n => y - h^[n] y) atTop (𝓝 (y - 0)) := by
refine tendsto_const_nhds.sub ?_
rw [tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
simp only [sub_zero]
refine squeeze_zero (fun _ => norm_nonneg _) hnle ?_
rw [← zero_mul ‖y‖]
refine (_root_.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one ?_ ?_).mul tendsto_const_nhds <;> norm_num
have feq : f x = y - 0 := tendsto_nhds_unique L₁ L₂
rw [sub_zero] at feq
exact ⟨x, feq, x_ineq⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.sets.closeds from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# Closed sets
We define a few types of closed sets in a topological space.
## Main Definitions
For a topological space `α`,
* `TopologicalSpace.Closeds α`: The type of closed sets.
* `TopologicalSpace.Clopens α`: The type of clopen sets.
-/
open Order OrderDual Set
variable {ι α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
namespace TopologicalSpace
/-! ### Closed sets -/
/-- The type of closed subsets of a topological space. -/
structure Closeds (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] where
/-- the carrier set, i.e. the points in this set -/
carrier : Set α
closed' : IsClosed carrier
#align topological_space.closeds TopologicalSpace.Closeds
namespace Closeds
instance : SetLike (Closeds α) α where
coe := Closeds.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Closeds α) (↑) IsClosed where
prf s hs := ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
theorem closed (s : Closeds α) : IsClosed (s : Set α) :=
s.closed'
#align topological_space.closeds.closed TopologicalSpace.Closeds.closed
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : Closeds α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections Closeds (carrier → coe, as_prefix coe)
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s t : Closeds α} (h : (s : Set α) = t) : s = t :=
SetLike.ext' h
#align topological_space.closeds.ext TopologicalSpace.Closeds.ext
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (s : Set α) (h) : (mk s h : Set α) = s :=
rfl
#align topological_space.closeds.coe_mk TopologicalSpace.Closeds.coe_mk
/-- The closure of a set, as an element of `TopologicalSpace.Closeds`. -/
@[simps]
protected def closure (s : Set α) : Closeds α :=
⟨closure s, isClosed_closure⟩
#align topological_space.closeds.closure TopologicalSpace.Closeds.closure
theorem gc : GaloisConnection Closeds.closure ((↑) : Closeds α → Set α) := fun _ U =>
⟨subset_closure.trans, fun h => closure_minimal h U.closed⟩
#align topological_space.closeds.gc TopologicalSpace.Closeds.gc
/-- The galois coinsertion between sets and opens. -/
def gi : GaloisInsertion (@Closeds.closure α _) (↑) where
choice s hs := ⟨s, closure_eq_iff_isClosed.1 <| hs.antisymm subset_closure⟩
gc := gc
le_l_u _ := subset_closure
choice_eq _s hs := SetLike.coe_injective <| subset_closure.antisymm hs
#align topological_space.closeds.gi TopologicalSpace.Closeds.gi
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Closeds α) :=
CompleteLattice.copy
(GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice gi)
-- le
_ rfl
-- top
⟨univ, isClosed_univ⟩ rfl
-- bot
⟨∅, isClosed_empty⟩ (SetLike.coe_injective closure_empty.symm)
-- sup
(fun s t => ⟨s ∪ t, s.2.union t.2⟩)
(funext fun s => funext fun t => SetLike.coe_injective (s.2.union t.2).closure_eq.symm)
-- inf
(fun s t => ⟨s ∩ t, s.2.inter t.2⟩) rfl
-- sSup
_ rfl
-- sInf
(fun S => ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, isClosed_biInter fun s _ => s.2⟩)
(funext fun _ => SetLike.coe_injective sInf_image.symm)
/-- The type of closed sets is inhabited, with default element the empty set. -/
instance : Inhabited (Closeds α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Topology/Sets/Closeds.lean | 110 | 111 | theorem coe_sup (s t : Closeds α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = ↑s ∪ ↑t := by |
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Over
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.MinimalPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Closeds
import Mathlib.Topology.Sober
#align_import algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7c017d750512a352b623b1824d75da5998457d0"
/-!
# Prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring
The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring is the type of all prime ideals.
It is naturally endowed with a topology: the Zariski topology.
(It is also naturally endowed with a sheaf of rings,
which is constructed in `AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf`.)
## Main definitions
* `PrimeSpectrum R`: The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring `R`,
i.e., the set of all prime ideals of `R`.
* `zeroLocus s`: The zero locus of a subset `s` of `R`
is the subset of `PrimeSpectrum R` consisting of all prime ideals that contain `s`.
* `vanishingIdeal t`: The vanishing ideal of a subset `t` of `PrimeSpectrum R`
is the intersection of points in `t` (viewed as prime ideals).
## Conventions
We denote subsets of (semi)rings with `s`, `s'`, etc...
whereas we denote subsets of prime spectra with `t`, `t'`, etc...
## Inspiration/contributors
The contents of this file draw inspiration from <https://github.com/ramonfmir/lean-scheme>
which has contributions from Ramon Fernandez Mir, Kevin Buzzard, Kenny Lau,
and Chris Hughes (on an earlier repository).
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v)
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring `R` is the type of all prime ideals of `R`.
It is naturally endowed with a topology (the Zariski topology),
and a sheaf of commutative rings (see `AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf`).
It is a fundamental building block in algebraic geometry. -/
@[ext]
structure PrimeSpectrum [CommSemiring R] where
asIdeal : Ideal R
IsPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
#align prime_spectrum PrimeSpectrum
attribute [instance] PrimeSpectrum.IsPrime
namespace PrimeSpectrum
section CommSemiRing
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable {R S}
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nonempty <| PrimeSpectrum R :=
let ⟨I, hI⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal R
⟨⟨I, hI.isPrime⟩⟩
/-- The prime spectrum of the zero ring is empty. -/
instance [Subsingleton R] : IsEmpty (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
⟨fun x ↦ x.IsPrime.ne_top <| SetLike.ext' <| Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty x.asIdeal.nonempty⟩
#noalign prime_spectrum.punit
variable (R S)
/-- The map from the direct sum of prime spectra to the prime spectrum of a direct product. -/
@[simp]
def primeSpectrumProdOfSum : Sum (PrimeSpectrum R) (PrimeSpectrum S) → PrimeSpectrum (R × S)
| Sum.inl ⟨I, _⟩ => ⟨Ideal.prod I ⊤, Ideal.isPrime_ideal_prod_top⟩
| Sum.inr ⟨J, _⟩ => ⟨Ideal.prod ⊤ J, Ideal.isPrime_ideal_prod_top'⟩
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_of_sum PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProdOfSum
/-- The prime spectrum of `R × S` is in bijection with the disjoint unions of the prime spectrum of
`R` and the prime spectrum of `S`. -/
noncomputable def primeSpectrumProd :
PrimeSpectrum (R × S) ≃ Sum (PrimeSpectrum R) (PrimeSpectrum S) :=
Equiv.symm <|
Equiv.ofBijective (primeSpectrumProdOfSum R S) (by
constructor
· rintro (⟨I, hI⟩ | ⟨J, hJ⟩) (⟨I', hI'⟩ | ⟨J', hJ'⟩) h <;>
simp only [mk.injEq, Ideal.prod.ext_iff, primeSpectrumProdOfSum] at h
· simp only [h]
· exact False.elim (hI.ne_top h.left)
· exact False.elim (hJ.ne_top h.right)
· simp only [h]
· rintro ⟨I, hI⟩
rcases (Ideal.ideal_prod_prime I).mp hI with (⟨p, ⟨hp, rfl⟩⟩ | ⟨p, ⟨hp, rfl⟩⟩)
· exact ⟨Sum.inl ⟨p, hp⟩, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨p, hp⟩, rfl⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd
variable {R S}
@[simp]
theorem primeSpectrumProd_symm_inl_asIdeal (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
((primeSpectrumProd R S).symm <| Sum.inl x).asIdeal = Ideal.prod x.asIdeal ⊤ := by
cases x
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inl_as_ideal PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd_symm_inl_asIdeal
@[simp]
theorem primeSpectrumProd_symm_inr_asIdeal (x : PrimeSpectrum S) :
((primeSpectrumProd R S).symm <| Sum.inr x).asIdeal = Ideal.prod ⊤ x.asIdeal := by
cases x
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_symm_inr_as_ideal PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd_symm_inr_asIdeal
/-- The zero locus of a set `s` of elements of a commutative (semi)ring `R` is the set of all
prime ideals of the ring that contain the set `s`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal) the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring
`R` modulo the prime ideal `x`. In this manner, `zeroLocus s` is exactly the subset of
`PrimeSpectrum R` where all "functions" in `s` vanish simultaneously.
-/
def zeroLocus (s : Set R) : Set (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
{ x | s ⊆ x.asIdeal }
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem mem_zeroLocus (x : PrimeSpectrum R) (s : Set R) : x ∈ zeroLocus s ↔ s ⊆ x.asIdeal :=
Iff.rfl
#align prime_spectrum.mem_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.mem_zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_span (s : Set R) : zeroLocus (Ideal.span s : Set R) = zeroLocus s := by
ext x
exact (Submodule.gi R R).gc s x.asIdeal
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_span PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_span
/-- The vanishing ideal of a set `t` of points of the prime spectrum of a commutative ring `R` is
the intersection of all the prime ideals in the set `t`.
An element `f` of `R` can be thought of as a dependent function on the prime spectrum of `R`.
At a point `x` (a prime ideal) the function (i.e., element) `f` takes values in the quotient ring
`R` modulo the prime ideal `x`. In this manner, `vanishingIdeal t` is exactly the ideal of `R`
consisting of all "functions" that vanish on all of `t`.
-/
def vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : Ideal R :=
⨅ (x : PrimeSpectrum R) (_ : x ∈ t), x.asIdeal
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal
theorem coe_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
(vanishingIdeal t : Set R) = { f : R | ∀ x : PrimeSpectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.asIdeal } := by
ext f
rw [vanishingIdeal, SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.mem_iInf]
apply forall_congr'; intro x
rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
#align prime_spectrum.coe_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.coe_vanishingIdeal
theorem mem_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) (f : R) :
f ∈ vanishingIdeal t ↔ ∀ x : PrimeSpectrum R, x ∈ t → f ∈ x.asIdeal := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_vanishingIdeal, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align prime_spectrum.mem_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.mem_vanishingIdeal
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_singleton (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
vanishingIdeal ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = x.asIdeal := by simp [vanishingIdeal]
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_singleton PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_singleton
theorem subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) (I : Ideal R) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus I ↔ I ≤ vanishingIdeal t :=
⟨fun h _ k => (mem_vanishingIdeal _ _).mpr fun _ j => (mem_zeroLocus _ _).mpr (h j) k, fun h =>
fun x j => (mem_zeroLocus _ _).mpr (le_trans h fun _ h => ((mem_vanishingIdeal _ _).mp h) x j)⟩
#align prime_spectrum.subset_zero_locus_iff_le_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal
section Gc
variable (R)
/-- `zeroLocus` and `vanishingIdeal` form a galois connection. -/
theorem gc :
@GaloisConnection (Ideal R) (Set (PrimeSpectrum R))ᵒᵈ _ _ (fun I => zeroLocus I) fun t =>
vanishingIdeal t :=
fun I t => subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal t I
#align prime_spectrum.gc PrimeSpectrum.gc
/-- `zeroLocus` and `vanishingIdeal` form a galois connection. -/
theorem gc_set :
@GaloisConnection (Set R) (Set (PrimeSpectrum R))ᵒᵈ _ _ (fun s => zeroLocus s) fun t =>
vanishingIdeal t := by
have ideal_gc : GaloisConnection Ideal.span _ := (Submodule.gi R R).gc
simpa [zeroLocus_span, Function.comp] using ideal_gc.compose (gc R)
#align prime_spectrum.gc_set PrimeSpectrum.gc_set
theorem subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) (s : Set R) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus s ↔ s ⊆ vanishingIdeal t :=
(gc_set R) s t
#align prime_spectrum.subset_zero_locus_iff_subset_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal
end Gc
theorem subset_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (s : Set R) : s ⊆ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus s) :=
(gc_set R).le_u_l s
#align prime_spectrum.subset_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.subset_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus
theorem le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus (I : Ideal R) : I ≤ vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus I) :=
(gc R).le_u_l I
#align prime_spectrum.le_vanishing_ideal_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.le_vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical (I : Ideal R) :
vanishingIdeal (zeroLocus (I : Set R)) = I.radical :=
Ideal.ext fun f => by
rw [mem_vanishingIdeal, Ideal.radical_eq_sInf, Submodule.mem_sInf]
exact ⟨fun h x hx => h ⟨x, hx.2⟩ hx.1, fun h x hx => h x.1 ⟨hx, x.2⟩⟩
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_zero_locus_eq_radical PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_radical (I : Ideal R) : zeroLocus (I.radical : Set R) = zeroLocus I :=
vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical I ▸ (gc R).l_u_l_eq_l I
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_radical PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_radical
theorem subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
t ⊆ zeroLocus (vanishingIdeal t) :=
(gc R).l_u_le t
#align prime_spectrum.subset_zero_locus_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono {s t : Set R} (h : s ⊆ t) : zeroLocus t ⊆ zeroLocus s :=
(gc_set R).monotone_l h
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_anti_mono PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_anti_mono
theorem zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal {s t : Ideal R} (h : s ≤ t) :
zeroLocus (t : Set R) ⊆ zeroLocus (s : Set R) :=
(gc R).monotone_l h
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_anti_mono_ideal PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono {s t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
vanishingIdeal t ≤ vanishingIdeal s :=
(gc R).monotone_u h
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_anti_mono PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono
theorem zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_iff (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus (I : Set R) ⊆ zeroLocus (J : Set R) ↔ J ≤ I.radical := by
rw [subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal, vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical]
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_iff PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_iff
theorem zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_singleton_iff (f g : R) :
zeroLocus ({f} : Set R) ⊆ zeroLocus {g} ↔ g ∈ (Ideal.span ({f} : Set R)).radical := by
rw [← zeroLocus_span {f}, ← zeroLocus_span {g}, zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_iff, Ideal.span_le,
Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_subset_zero_locus_singleton_iff PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_singleton_iff
theorem zeroLocus_bot : zeroLocus ((⊥ : Ideal R) : Set R) = Set.univ :=
(gc R).l_bot
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_bot PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_bot
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_zero : zeroLocus ({0} : Set R) = Set.univ :=
zeroLocus_bot
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_zero PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_zero
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_empty : zeroLocus (∅ : Set R) = Set.univ :=
(gc_set R).l_bot
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_empty
@[simp]
theorem vanishingIdeal_univ : vanishingIdeal (∅ : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = ⊤ := by
simpa using (gc R).u_top
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_univ PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_univ
theorem zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem {s : Set R} (h : (1 : R) ∈ s) : zeroLocus s = ∅ := by
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x hx
rw [mem_zeroLocus] at hx
have x_prime : x.asIdeal.IsPrime := by infer_instance
have eq_top : x.asIdeal = ⊤ := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one]
exact hx h
apply x_prime.ne_top eq_top
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty_of_one_mem PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_one : zeroLocus ({1} : Set R) = ∅ :=
zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem (Set.mem_singleton (1 : R))
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_one PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_one
theorem zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top {I : Ideal R} : zeroLocus (I : Set R) = ∅ ↔ I = ⊤ := by
constructor
· contrapose!
intro h
rcases Ideal.exists_le_maximal I h with ⟨M, hM, hIM⟩
exact ⟨⟨M, hM.isPrime⟩, hIM⟩
· rintro rfl
apply zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem
trivial
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_empty_iff_eq_top PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_univ : zeroLocus (Set.univ : Set R) = ∅ :=
zeroLocus_empty_of_one_mem (Set.mem_univ 1)
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_univ PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_univ
theorem vanishingIdeal_eq_top_iff {s : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} : vanishingIdeal s = ⊤ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal, Submodule.top_coe, zeroLocus_univ,
Set.subset_empty_iff]
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_eq_top_iff PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_eq_top_iff
theorem zeroLocus_sup (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((I ⊔ J : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I ∩ zeroLocus J :=
(gc R).l_sup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_sup PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_sup
theorem zeroLocus_union (s s' : Set R) : zeroLocus (s ∪ s') = zeroLocus s ∩ zeroLocus s' :=
(gc_set R).l_sup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_union PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_union
theorem vanishingIdeal_union (t t' : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal (t ∪ t') = vanishingIdeal t ⊓ vanishingIdeal t' :=
(gc R).u_inf
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_union PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_union
theorem zeroLocus_iSup {ι : Sort*} (I : ι → Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((⨆ i, I i : Ideal R) : Set R) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus (I i) :=
(gc R).l_iSup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_supr PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_iSup
theorem zeroLocus_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → Set R) :
zeroLocus (⋃ i, s i) = ⋂ i, zeroLocus (s i) :=
(gc_set R).l_iSup
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_Union PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_iUnion
theorem zeroLocus_bUnion (s : Set (Set R)) :
zeroLocus (⋃ s' ∈ s, s' : Set R) = ⋂ s' ∈ s, zeroLocus s' := by simp only [zeroLocus_iUnion]
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_bUnion PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_bUnion
theorem vanishingIdeal_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (t : ι → Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal (⋃ i, t i) = ⨅ i, vanishingIdeal (t i) :=
(gc R).u_iInf
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_Union PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_iUnion
theorem zeroLocus_inf (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((I ⊓ J : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I ∪ zeroLocus J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.2.inf_le
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_inf PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_inf
theorem union_zeroLocus (s s' : Set R) :
zeroLocus s ∪ zeroLocus s' = zeroLocus (Ideal.span s ⊓ Ideal.span s' : Ideal R) := by
rw [zeroLocus_inf]
simp
#align prime_spectrum.union_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.union_zeroLocus
theorem zeroLocus_mul (I J : Ideal R) :
zeroLocus ((I * J : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I ∪ zeroLocus J :=
Set.ext fun x => x.2.mul_le
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_mul PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_mul
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_mul (f g : R) :
zeroLocus ({f * g} : Set R) = zeroLocus {f} ∪ zeroLocus {g} :=
Set.ext fun x => by simpa using x.2.mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_mul PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_mul
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_pow (I : Ideal R) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
zeroLocus ((I ^ n : Ideal R) : Set R) = zeroLocus I :=
zeroLocus_radical (I ^ n) ▸ (I.radical_pow hn).symm ▸ zeroLocus_radical I
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_pow PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_pow
@[simp]
theorem zeroLocus_singleton_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
zeroLocus ({f ^ n} : Set R) = zeroLocus {f} :=
Set.ext fun x => by simpa using x.2.pow_mem_iff_mem n hn
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_singleton_pow PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_singleton_pow
theorem sup_vanishingIdeal_le (t t' : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal t ⊔ vanishingIdeal t' ≤ vanishingIdeal (t ∩ t') := by
intro r
rw [Submodule.mem_sup, mem_vanishingIdeal]
rintro ⟨f, hf, g, hg, rfl⟩ x ⟨hxt, hxt'⟩
rw [mem_vanishingIdeal] at hf hg
apply Submodule.add_mem <;> solve_by_elim
#align prime_spectrum.sup_vanishing_ideal_le PrimeSpectrum.sup_vanishingIdeal_le
theorem mem_compl_zeroLocus_iff_not_mem {f : R} {I : PrimeSpectrum R} :
I ∈ (zeroLocus {f} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R))ᶜ ↔ f ∉ I.asIdeal := by
rw [Set.mem_compl_iff, mem_zeroLocus, Set.singleton_subset_iff]; rfl
#align prime_spectrum.mem_compl_zero_locus_iff_not_mem PrimeSpectrum.mem_compl_zeroLocus_iff_not_mem
/-- The Zariski topology on the prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring is defined
via the closed sets of the topology: they are exactly those sets that are the zero locus
of a subset of the ring. -/
instance zariskiTopology : TopologicalSpace (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
TopologicalSpace.ofClosed (Set.range PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus) ⟨Set.univ, by simp⟩
(by
intro Zs h
rw [Set.sInter_eq_iInter]
choose f hf using fun i : Zs => h i.prop
simp only [← hf]
exact ⟨_, zeroLocus_iUnion _⟩)
(by
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, (union_zeroLocus s t).symm⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.zariski_topology PrimeSpectrum.zariskiTopology
theorem isOpen_iff (U : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s, Uᶜ = zeroLocus s := by
simp only [@eq_comm _ Uᶜ]; rfl
#align prime_spectrum.is_open_iff PrimeSpectrum.isOpen_iff
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus (Z : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ s, Z = zeroLocus s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff, compl_compl]
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_iff_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_iff_zeroLocus
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal (Z : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, Z = zeroLocus I :=
(isClosed_iff_zeroLocus _).trans
⟨fun ⟨s, hs⟩ => ⟨_, (zeroLocus_span s).substr hs⟩, fun ⟨I, hI⟩ => ⟨I, hI⟩⟩
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_iff_zero_locus_ideal PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal
theorem isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_radical_ideal (Z : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
IsClosed Z ↔ ∃ I : Ideal R, I.IsRadical ∧ Z = zeroLocus I :=
(isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal _).trans
⟨fun ⟨I, hI⟩ => ⟨_, I.radical_isRadical, (zeroLocus_radical I).substr hI⟩, fun ⟨I, _, hI⟩ =>
⟨I, hI⟩⟩
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_iff_zero_locus_radical_ideal PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_radical_ideal
theorem isClosed_zeroLocus (s : Set R) : IsClosed (zeroLocus s) := by
rw [isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
exact ⟨s, rfl⟩
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_zeroLocus
theorem zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
zeroLocus (vanishingIdeal t : Set R) = closure t := by
rcases isClosed_iff_zeroLocus (closure t) |>.mp isClosed_closure with ⟨I, hI⟩
rw [subset_antisymm_iff, (isClosed_zeroLocus _).closure_subset_iff, hI,
subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal, (gc R).u_l_u_eq_u,
← subset_zeroLocus_iff_subset_vanishingIdeal, ← hI]
exact ⟨subset_closure, subset_zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal t⟩
#align prime_spectrum.zero_locus_vanishing_ideal_eq_closure PrimeSpectrum.zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure
theorem vanishingIdeal_closure (t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :
vanishingIdeal (closure t) = vanishingIdeal t :=
zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure t ▸ (gc R).u_l_u_eq_u t
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_closure PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_closure
theorem closure_singleton (x) : closure ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = zeroLocus x.asIdeal := by
rw [← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, vanishingIdeal_singleton]
#align prime_spectrum.closure_singleton PrimeSpectrum.closure_singleton
theorem isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
IsClosed ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) ↔ x.asIdeal.IsMaximal := by
rw [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure,
vanishingIdeal_singleton]
constructor <;> intro H
· rcases x.asIdeal.exists_le_maximal x.2.1 with ⟨m, hm, hxm⟩
exact (congr_arg asIdeal (@H ⟨m, hm.isPrime⟩ hxm)) ▸ hm
· exact fun p hp ↦ PrimeSpectrum.ext _ _ (H.eq_of_le p.2.1 hp).symm
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_singleton_iff_is_maximal PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal
theorem isRadical_vanishingIdeal (s : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) : (vanishingIdeal s).IsRadical := by
rw [← vanishingIdeal_closure, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure,
vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical]
apply Ideal.radical_isRadical
#align prime_spectrum.is_radical_vanishing_ideal PrimeSpectrum.isRadical_vanishingIdeal
theorem vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff {s t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} (ht : IsClosed t) :
s ⊆ t ↔ vanishingIdeal t ≤ vanishingIdeal s :=
⟨vanishingIdeal_anti_mono, fun h => by
rw [← ht.closure_subset_iff, ← ht.closure_eq]
convert ← zeroLocus_anti_mono_ideal h <;> apply zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure⟩
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_anti_mono_iff PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff
theorem vanishingIdeal_strict_anti_mono_iff {s t : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} (hs : IsClosed s)
(ht : IsClosed t) : s ⊂ t ↔ vanishingIdeal t < vanishingIdeal s := by
rw [Set.ssubset_def, vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff hs, vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff ht,
lt_iff_le_not_le]
#align prime_spectrum.vanishing_ideal_strict_anti_mono_iff PrimeSpectrum.vanishingIdeal_strict_anti_mono_iff
/-- The antitone order embedding of closed subsets of `Spec R` into ideals of `R`. -/
def closedsEmbedding (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
(TopologicalSpace.Closeds <| PrimeSpectrum R)ᵒᵈ ↪o Ideal R :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun s => vanishingIdeal ↑(OrderDual.ofDual s)) fun s _ =>
(vanishingIdeal_anti_mono_iff s.2).symm
#align prime_spectrum.closeds_embedding PrimeSpectrum.closedsEmbedding
theorem t1Space_iff_isField [IsDomain R] : T1Space (PrimeSpectrum R) ↔ IsField R := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· intro h
have hbot : Ideal.IsPrime (⊥ : Ideal R) := Ideal.bot_prime
exact
Classical.not_not.1
(mt
(Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField <|
(isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal _).1 (T1Space.t1 ⟨⊥, hbot⟩))
(by aesop))
· refine ⟨fun x => (isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal x).2 ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x.asIdeal = ⊥
· letI := h.toSemifield
exact hx.symm ▸ Ideal.bot_isMaximal
· exact absurd h (Ring.not_isField_iff_exists_prime.2 ⟨x.asIdeal, ⟨hx, x.2⟩⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.t1_space_iff_is_field PrimeSpectrum.t1Space_iff_isField
local notation "Z(" a ")" => zeroLocus (a : Set R)
theorem isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical (I : Ideal R) (hI : I.IsRadical) :
IsIrreducible (zeroLocus (I : Set R)) ↔ I.IsPrime := by
rw [Ideal.isPrime_iff, IsIrreducible]
apply and_congr
· rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top]
· trans ∀ x y : Ideal R, Z(I) ⊆ Z(x) ∪ Z(y) → Z(I) ⊆ Z(x) ∨ Z(I) ⊆ Z(y)
· simp_rw [isPreirreducible_iff_closed_union_closed, isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal]
constructor
· rintro h x y
exact h _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩
· rintro h _ _ ⟨x, rfl⟩ ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h x y
· simp_rw [← zeroLocus_inf, subset_zeroLocus_iff_le_vanishingIdeal,
vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical, hI.radical]
constructor
· simp_rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Set.singleton_subset_iff, ← Ideal.span_le, ←
Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
refine fun h x y h' => h _ _ ?_
rw [← hI.radical_le_iff] at h' ⊢
simpa only [Ideal.radical_inf, Ideal.radical_mul] using h'
· simp_rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
rintro h s t h' ⟨x, hx, hx'⟩ y hy
exact h (h' ⟨Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ hx, Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ hy⟩) hx'
#align prime_spectrum.is_irreducible_zero_locus_iff_of_radical PrimeSpectrum.isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical
theorem isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff (I : Ideal R) :
IsIrreducible (zeroLocus (I : Set R)) ↔ I.radical.IsPrime :=
zeroLocus_radical I ▸ isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical _ I.radical_isRadical
#align prime_spectrum.is_irreducible_zero_locus_iff PrimeSpectrum.isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff
theorem isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime {s : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)} :
IsIrreducible s ↔ (vanishingIdeal s).IsPrime := by
rw [← isIrreducible_iff_closure, ← zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure,
isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical _ (isRadical_vanishingIdeal s)]
#align prime_spectrum.is_irreducible_iff_vanishing_ideal_is_prime PrimeSpectrum.isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime
lemma vanishingIdeal_isIrreducible :
vanishingIdeal (R := R) '' {s | IsIrreducible s} = {P | P.IsPrime} :=
Set.ext fun I ↦ ⟨fun ⟨_, hs, e⟩ ↦ e ▸ isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime.mp hs,
fun h ↦ ⟨zeroLocus I, (isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff_of_radical _ h.isRadical).mpr h,
(vanishingIdeal_zeroLocus_eq_radical I).trans h.radical⟩⟩
lemma vanishingIdeal_isClosed_isIrreducible :
vanishingIdeal (R := R) '' {s | IsClosed s ∧ IsIrreducible s} = {P | P.IsPrime} := by
refine (subset_antisymm ?_ ?_).trans vanishingIdeal_isIrreducible
· exact Set.image_subset _ fun _ ↦ And.right
rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
exact ⟨closure s, ⟨isClosed_closure, hs.closure⟩, vanishingIdeal_closure s⟩
instance irreducibleSpace [IsDomain R] : IrreducibleSpace (PrimeSpectrum R) := by
rw [irreducibleSpace_def, Set.top_eq_univ, ← zeroLocus_bot, isIrreducible_zeroLocus_iff]
simpa using Ideal.bot_prime
instance quasiSober : QuasiSober (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
⟨fun {S} h₁ h₂ =>
⟨⟨_, isIrreducible_iff_vanishingIdeal_isPrime.1 h₁⟩, by
rw [IsGenericPoint, closure_singleton, zeroLocus_vanishingIdeal_eq_closure, h₂.closure_eq]⟩⟩
/-- The prime spectrum of a commutative (semi)ring is a compact topological space. -/
instance compactSpace : CompactSpace (PrimeSpectrum R) := by
refine compactSpace_of_finite_subfamily_closed fun S S_closed S_empty ↦ ?_
choose I hI using fun i ↦ (isClosed_iff_zeroLocus_ideal (S i)).mp (S_closed i)
simp_rw [hI, ← zeroLocus_iSup, zeroLocus_empty_iff_eq_top, ← top_le_iff] at S_empty ⊢
exact Ideal.isCompactElement_top.exists_finset_of_le_iSup _ _ S_empty
section Comap
variable {S' : Type*} [CommSemiring S']
theorem preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux (f : R →+* S) (s : Set R) :
(fun y => ⟨Ideal.comap f y.asIdeal, inferInstance⟩ : PrimeSpectrum S → PrimeSpectrum R) ⁻¹'
zeroLocus s =
zeroLocus (f '' s) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_zeroLocus, Set.image_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, mem_zeroLocus, Ideal.coe_comap]
#align prime_spectrum.preimage_comap_zero_locus_aux PrimeSpectrum.preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux
/-- The function between prime spectra of commutative (semi)rings induced by a ring homomorphism.
This function is continuous. -/
def comap (f : R →+* S) : C(PrimeSpectrum S, PrimeSpectrum R) where
toFun y := ⟨Ideal.comap f y.asIdeal, inferInstance⟩
continuous_toFun := by
simp only [continuous_iff_isClosed, isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux f s⟩
#align prime_spectrum.comap PrimeSpectrum.comap
variable (f : R →+* S)
@[simp]
theorem comap_asIdeal (y : PrimeSpectrum S) : (comap f y).asIdeal = Ideal.comap f y.asIdeal :=
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_as_ideal PrimeSpectrum.comap_asIdeal
@[simp]
theorem comap_id : comap (RingHom.id R) = ContinuousMap.id _ := by
ext
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_id PrimeSpectrum.comap_id
@[simp]
theorem comap_comp (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* S') : comap (g.comp f) = (comap f).comp (comap g) :=
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_comp PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp
theorem comap_comp_apply (f : R →+* S) (g : S →+* S') (x : PrimeSpectrum S') :
PrimeSpectrum.comap (g.comp f) x = (PrimeSpectrum.comap f) (PrimeSpectrum.comap g x) :=
rfl
#align prime_spectrum.comap_comp_apply PrimeSpectrum.comap_comp_apply
@[simp]
theorem preimage_comap_zeroLocus (s : Set R) : comap f ⁻¹' zeroLocus s = zeroLocus (f '' s) :=
preimage_comap_zeroLocus_aux f s
#align prime_spectrum.preimage_comap_zero_locus PrimeSpectrum.preimage_comap_zeroLocus
theorem comap_injective_of_surjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Injective (comap f) := fun x y h =>
PrimeSpectrum.ext _ _
(Ideal.comap_injective_of_surjective f hf
(congr_arg PrimeSpectrum.asIdeal h : (comap f x).asIdeal = (comap f y).asIdeal))
#align prime_spectrum.comap_injective_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.comap_injective_of_surjective
variable (S)
theorem localization_comap_inducing [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Inducing (comap (algebraMap R S)) := by
refine ⟨TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed fun Z ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [isClosed_induced_iff, isClosed_iff_zeroLocus, @eq_comm _ _ (zeroLocus _),
exists_exists_eq_and, preimage_comap_zeroLocus]
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(Ideal.span s).comap (algebraMap R S), ?_⟩
rw [← zeroLocus_span, ← zeroLocus_span s, ← Ideal.map, IsLocalization.map_comap M S]
· rintro ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_inducing PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_inducing
theorem localization_comap_injective [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Function.Injective (comap (algebraMap R S)) := by
intro p q h
replace h := congr_arg (fun x : PrimeSpectrum R => Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) x.asIdeal) h
dsimp only [comap, ContinuousMap.coe_mk] at h
rw [IsLocalization.map_comap M S, IsLocalization.map_comap M S] at h
ext1
exact h
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_injective PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_injective
theorem localization_comap_embedding [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Embedding (comap (algebraMap R S)) :=
⟨localization_comap_inducing S M, localization_comap_injective S M⟩
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_embedding PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_embedding
theorem localization_comap_range [Algebra R S] (M : Submonoid R) [IsLocalization M S] :
Set.range (comap (algebraMap R S)) = { p | Disjoint (M : Set R) p.asIdeal } := by
ext x
constructor
· simp_rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro ⟨p, rfl⟩ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact (p.2.1 : ¬_) (p.asIdeal.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem hx₂ (IsLocalization.map_units S ⟨x, hx₁⟩))
· intro h
use ⟨x.asIdeal.map (algebraMap R S), IsLocalization.isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint M S _ x.2 h⟩
ext1
exact IsLocalization.comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint M S _ x.2 h
#align prime_spectrum.localization_comap_range PrimeSpectrum.localization_comap_range
open Function RingHom
theorem comap_inducing_of_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Inducing (comap f) where
induced := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp_rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, ← isClosed_compl_iff,
← @isClosed_compl_iff (PrimeSpectrum S)
((TopologicalSpace.induced (comap f) zariskiTopology)), isClosed_induced_iff,
isClosed_iff_zeroLocus]
refine fun s =>
⟨fun ⟨F, hF⟩ =>
⟨zeroLocus (f ⁻¹' F), ⟨f ⁻¹' F, rfl⟩, by
rw [preimage_comap_zeroLocus, Function.Surjective.image_preimage hf, hF]⟩,
?_⟩
rintro ⟨-, ⟨F, rfl⟩, hF⟩
exact ⟨f '' F, hF.symm.trans (preimage_comap_zeroLocus f F)⟩
#align prime_spectrum.comap_inducing_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.comap_inducing_of_surjective
end Comap
end CommSemiRing
section SpecOfSurjective
/-! The comap of a surjective ring homomorphism is a closed embedding between the prime spectra. -/
open Function RingHom
variable [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable (f : R →+* S)
variable {R}
theorem comap_singleton_isClosed_of_surjective (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(x : PrimeSpectrum S) (hx : IsClosed ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum S))) :
IsClosed ({comap f x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :=
haveI : x.asIdeal.IsMaximal := (isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal x).1 hx
(isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal _).2 (Ideal.comap_isMaximal_of_surjective f hf)
#align prime_spectrum.comap_singleton_is_closed_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.comap_singleton_isClosed_of_surjective
theorem comap_singleton_isClosed_of_isIntegral (f : R →+* S) (hf : f.IsIntegral)
(x : PrimeSpectrum S) (hx : IsClosed ({x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum S))) :
IsClosed ({comap f x} : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :=
have := (isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal x).1 hx
(isClosed_singleton_iff_isMaximal _).2
(Ideal.isMaximal_comap_of_isIntegral_of_isMaximal' f hf x.asIdeal)
#align prime_spectrum.comap_singleton_is_closed_of_is_integral PrimeSpectrum.comap_singleton_isClosed_of_isIntegral
theorem image_comap_zeroLocus_eq_zeroLocus_comap (hf : Surjective f) (I : Ideal S) :
comap f '' zeroLocus I = zeroLocus (I.comap f) := by
simp only [Set.ext_iff, Set.mem_image, mem_zeroLocus, SetLike.coe_subset_coe]
refine fun p => ⟨?_, fun h_I_p => ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩ a ha
exact hp ha
· have hp : ker f ≤ p.asIdeal := (Ideal.comap_mono bot_le).trans h_I_p
refine ⟨⟨p.asIdeal.map f, Ideal.map_isPrime_of_surjective hf hp⟩, fun x hx => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x', rfl⟩ := hf x
exact Ideal.mem_map_of_mem f (h_I_p hx)
· ext x
rw [comap_asIdeal, Ideal.mem_comap, Ideal.mem_map_iff_of_surjective f hf]
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x', hx', heq⟩
rw [← sub_sub_cancel x' x]
refine p.asIdeal.sub_mem hx' (hp ?_)
rwa [mem_ker, map_sub, sub_eq_zero]
#align prime_spectrum.image_comap_zero_locus_eq_zero_locus_comap PrimeSpectrum.image_comap_zeroLocus_eq_zeroLocus_comap
theorem range_comap_of_surjective (hf : Surjective f) :
Set.range (comap f) = zeroLocus (ker f) := by
rw [← Set.image_univ]
convert image_comap_zeroLocus_eq_zeroLocus_comap _ _ hf _
rw [zeroLocus_bot]
#align prime_spectrum.range_comap_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.range_comap_of_surjective
theorem isClosed_range_comap_of_surjective (hf : Surjective f) :
IsClosed (Set.range (comap f)) := by
rw [range_comap_of_surjective _ f hf]
exact isClosed_zeroLocus _
#align prime_spectrum.is_closed_range_comap_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.isClosed_range_comap_of_surjective
theorem closedEmbedding_comap_of_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : ClosedEmbedding (comap f) :=
{ induced := (comap_inducing_of_surjective S f hf).induced
inj := comap_injective_of_surjective f hf
isClosed_range := isClosed_range_comap_of_surjective S f hf }
#align prime_spectrum.closed_embedding_comap_of_surjective PrimeSpectrum.closedEmbedding_comap_of_surjective
end SpecOfSurjective
section CommSemiRing
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable {R S}
section BasicOpen
/-- `basicOpen r` is the open subset containing all prime ideals not containing `r`. -/
def basicOpen (r : R) : TopologicalSpace.Opens (PrimeSpectrum R) where
carrier := { x | r ∉ x.asIdeal }
is_open' := ⟨{r}, Set.ext fun _ => Set.singleton_subset_iff.trans <| Classical.not_not.symm⟩
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen
@[simp]
theorem mem_basicOpen (f : R) (x : PrimeSpectrum R) : x ∈ basicOpen f ↔ f ∉ x.asIdeal :=
Iff.rfl
#align prime_spectrum.mem_basic_open PrimeSpectrum.mem_basicOpen
theorem isOpen_basicOpen {a : R} : IsOpen (basicOpen a : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) :=
(basicOpen a).isOpen
#align prime_spectrum.is_open_basic_open PrimeSpectrum.isOpen_basicOpen
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl (r : R) :
(basicOpen r : Set (PrimeSpectrum R)) = (zeroLocus {r})ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_basicOpen, Set.mem_compl_iff, mem_zeroLocus,
Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_eq_zero_locus_compl PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_one : basicOpen (1 : R) = ⊤ :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simp
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_one PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_one
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_zero : basicOpen (0 : R) = ⊥ :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simp
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_zero PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_zero
theorem basicOpen_le_basicOpen_iff (f g : R) :
basicOpen f ≤ basicOpen g ↔ f ∈ (Ideal.span ({g} : Set R)).radical := by
rw [← SetLike.coe_subset_coe, basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl, basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl,
Set.compl_subset_compl, zeroLocus_subset_zeroLocus_singleton_iff]
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_le_basic_open_iff PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_le_basicOpen_iff
theorem basicOpen_mul (f g : R) : basicOpen (f * g) = basicOpen f ⊓ basicOpen g :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simp [zeroLocus_singleton_mul]
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_mul PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul
theorem basicOpen_mul_le_left (f g : R) : basicOpen (f * g) ≤ basicOpen f := by
rw [basicOpen_mul f g]
exact inf_le_left
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_mul_le_left PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul_le_left
theorem basicOpen_mul_le_right (f g : R) : basicOpen (f * g) ≤ basicOpen g := by
rw [basicOpen_mul f g]
exact inf_le_right
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_mul_le_right PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem basicOpen_pow (f : R) (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : basicOpen (f ^ n) = basicOpen f :=
TopologicalSpace.Opens.ext <| by simpa using zeroLocus_singleton_pow f n hn
#align prime_spectrum.basic_open_pow PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen_pow
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/PrimeSpectrum/Basic.lean | 833 | 844 | theorem isTopologicalBasis_basic_opens :
TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis
(Set.range fun r : R => (basicOpen r : Set (PrimeSpectrum R))) := by |
apply TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
· rintro _ ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact isOpen_basicOpen
· rintro p U hp ⟨s, hs⟩
rw [← compl_compl U, Set.mem_compl_iff, ← hs, mem_zeroLocus, Set.not_subset] at hp
obtain ⟨f, hfs, hfp⟩ := hp
refine ⟨basicOpen f, ⟨f, rfl⟩, hfp, ?_⟩
rw [← Set.compl_subset_compl, ← hs, basicOpen_eq_zeroLocus_compl, compl_compl]
exact zeroLocus_anti_mono (Set.singleton_subset_iff.mpr hfs)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Card
/-!
# Definitions for finite and locally finite graphs
This file defines finite versions of `edgeSet`, `neighborSet` and `incidenceSet` and proves some
of their basic properties. It also defines the notion of a locally finite graph, which is one
whose vertices have finite degree.
The design for finiteness is that each definition takes the smallest finiteness assumption
necessary. For example, `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset v` only requires that `v` have
finitely many neighbors.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.edgeFinset` is the `Finset` of edges in a graph, if `edgeSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.neighborFinset` is the `Finset` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex,
if `neighborSet` is finite
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceFinset` is the `Finset` of edges containing a given vertex,
if `incidenceSet` is finite
## Naming conventions
If the vertex type of a graph is finite, we refer to its cardinality as `CardVerts`
or `card_verts`.
## Implementation notes
* A locally finite graph is one with instances `Π v, Fintype (G.neighborSet v)`.
* Given instances `DecidableRel G.Adj` and `Fintype V`, then the graph
is locally finite, too.
-/
open Finset Function
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph V) {e : Sym2 V}
section EdgeFinset
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V} [Fintype G.edgeSet] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet]
/-- The `edgeSet` of the graph as a `Finset`. -/
abbrev edgeFinset : Finset (Sym2 V) :=
Set.toFinset G.edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_edgeFinset : (G.edgeFinset : Set (Sym2 V)) = G.edgeSet :=
Set.coe_toFinset _
#align simple_graph.coe_edge_finset SimpleGraph.coe_edgeFinset
variable {G}
theorem mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset ↔ e ∈ G.edgeSet :=
Set.mem_toFinset
#align simple_graph.mem_edge_finset SimpleGraph.mem_edgeFinset
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset : e ∈ G.edgeFinset → ¬e.IsDiag :=
not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ ∘ mem_edgeFinset.1
#align simple_graph.not_is_diag_of_mem_edge_finset SimpleGraph.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_inj : G₁.edgeFinset = G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ = G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_inj SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_inj
theorem edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊆ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_subset_edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
theorem edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset : G₁.edgeFinset ⊂ G₂.edgeFinset ↔ G₁ < G₂ := by simp
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_ssubset_edge_finset SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_subset_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_mono SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, edgeFinset_strict_mono⟩ := edgeFinset_ssubset_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_strict_mono SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_strict_mono
attribute [mono] edgeFinset_mono edgeFinset_strict_mono
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = ∅ := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_bot SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sup [Fintype (edgeSet (G₁ ⊔ G₂))] [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∪ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_sup SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_sup
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_inf [DecidableEq V] : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset ∩ G₂.edgeFinset := by
simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_inf SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_inf
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_sdiff [DecidableEq V] :
(G₁ \ G₂).edgeFinset = G₁.edgeFinset \ G₂.edgeFinset := by simp [edgeFinset]
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_sdiff SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_sdiff
theorem edgeFinset_card : G.edgeFinset.card = Fintype.card G.edgeSet :=
Set.toFinset_card _
#align simple_graph.edge_finset_card SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_card
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_univ_card : (univ : Finset G.edgeSet).card = G.edgeFinset.card :=
Fintype.card_of_subtype G.edgeFinset fun _ => mem_edgeFinset
#align simple_graph.edge_set_univ_card SimpleGraph.edgeSet_univ_card
variable [Fintype V]
@[simp]
theorem edgeFinset_top [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset = univ.filter fun e => ¬e.IsDiag := by
rw [← coe_inj]; simp
/-- The complete graph on `n` vertices has `n.choose 2` edges. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finite.lean | 125 | 127 | theorem card_edgeFinset_top_eq_card_choose_two [DecidableEq V] :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeFinset.card = (Fintype.card V).choose 2 := by |
simp_rw [Set.toFinset_card, edgeSet_top, Set.coe_setOf, ← Sym2.card_subtype_not_diag]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Seq.Seq
#align_import data.seq.wseq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7e36e48519ab281320c4d192da6a7b348ce40ad"
/-!
# Partially defined possibly infinite lists
This file provides a `WSeq α` type representing partially defined possibly infinite lists
(referred here as weak sequences).
-/
namespace Stream'
open Function
universe u v w
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
/-- Weak sequences.
While the `Seq` structure allows for lists which may not be finite,
a weak sequence also allows the computation of each element to
involve an indeterminate amount of computation, including possibly
an infinite loop. This is represented as a regular `Seq` interspersed
with `none` elements to indicate that computation is ongoing.
This model is appropriate for Haskell style lazy lists, and is closed
under most interesting computation patterns on infinite lists,
but conversely it is difficult to extract elements from it. -/
def WSeq (α) :=
Seq (Option α)
#align stream.wseq Stream'.WSeq
/-
coinductive WSeq (α : Type u) : Type u
| nil : WSeq α
| cons : α → WSeq α → WSeq α
| think : WSeq α → WSeq α
-/
namespace WSeq
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- Turn a sequence into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofSeq : Seq α → WSeq α :=
(· <$> ·) some
#align stream.wseq.of_seq Stream'.WSeq.ofSeq
/-- Turn a list into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofList (l : List α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_list Stream'.WSeq.ofList
/-- Turn a stream into a weak sequence -/
@[coe]
def ofStream (l : Stream' α) : WSeq α :=
ofSeq l
#align stream.wseq.of_stream Stream'.WSeq.ofStream
instance coeSeq : Coe (Seq α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofSeq⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_seq Stream'.WSeq.coeSeq
instance coeList : Coe (List α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_list Stream'.WSeq.coeList
instance coeStream : Coe (Stream' α) (WSeq α) :=
⟨ofStream⟩
#align stream.wseq.coe_stream Stream'.WSeq.coeStream
/-- The empty weak sequence -/
def nil : WSeq α :=
Seq.nil
#align stream.wseq.nil Stream'.WSeq.nil
instance inhabited : Inhabited (WSeq α) :=
⟨nil⟩
#align stream.wseq.inhabited Stream'.WSeq.inhabited
/-- Prepend an element to a weak sequence -/
def cons (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons (some a)
#align stream.wseq.cons Stream'.WSeq.cons
/-- Compute for one tick, without producing any elements -/
def think : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.cons none
#align stream.wseq.think Stream'.WSeq.think
/-- Destruct a weak sequence, to (eventually possibly) produce either
`none` for `nil` or `some (a, s)` if an element is produced. -/
def destruct : WSeq α → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α)) :=
Computation.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl none
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inl (some (a, s'))
#align stream.wseq.destruct Stream'.WSeq.destruct
/-- Recursion principle for weak sequences, compare with `List.recOn`. -/
def recOn {C : WSeq α → Sort v} (s : WSeq α) (h1 : C nil) (h2 : ∀ x s, C (cons x s))
(h3 : ∀ s, C (think s)) : C s :=
Seq.recOn s h1 fun o => Option.recOn o h3 h2
#align stream.wseq.rec_on Stream'.WSeq.recOn
/-- membership for weak sequences-/
protected def Mem (a : α) (s : WSeq α) :=
Seq.Mem (some a) s
#align stream.wseq.mem Stream'.WSeq.Mem
instance membership : Membership α (WSeq α) :=
⟨WSeq.Mem⟩
#align stream.wseq.has_mem Stream'.WSeq.membership
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : a ∉ @nil α :=
Seq.not_mem_nil (some a)
#align stream.wseq.not_mem_nil Stream'.WSeq.not_mem_nil
/-- Get the head of a weak sequence. This involves a possibly
infinite computation. -/
def head (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
Computation.map (Prod.fst <$> ·) (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head Stream'.WSeq.head
/-- Encode a computation yielding a weak sequence into additional
`think` constructors in a weak sequence -/
def flatten : Computation (WSeq α) → WSeq α :=
Seq.corec fun c =>
match Computation.destruct c with
| Sum.inl s => Seq.omap (return ·) (Seq.destruct s)
| Sum.inr c' => some (none, c')
#align stream.wseq.flatten Stream'.WSeq.flatten
/-- Get the tail of a weak sequence. This doesn't need a `Computation`
wrapper, unlike `head`, because `flatten` allows us to hide this
in the construction of the weak sequence itself. -/
def tail (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
flatten <| (fun o => Option.recOn o nil Prod.snd) <$> destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail Stream'.WSeq.tail
/-- drop the first `n` elements from `s`. -/
def drop (s : WSeq α) : ℕ → WSeq α
| 0 => s
| n + 1 => tail (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.drop Stream'.WSeq.drop
/-- Get the nth element of `s`. -/
def get? (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (Option α) :=
head (drop s n)
#align stream.wseq.nth Stream'.WSeq.get?
/-- Convert `s` to a list (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def toList (s : WSeq α) : Computation (List α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α) (List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl l.reverse
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (l, s')
| some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (a::l, s'))
([], s)
#align stream.wseq.to_list Stream'.WSeq.toList
/-- Get the length of `s` (if it is finite and completes in finite time). -/
def length (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
@Computation.corec ℕ (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl n
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, s')
| some (some _, s') => Sum.inr (n + 1, s'))
(0, s)
#align stream.wseq.length Stream'.WSeq.length
/-- A weak sequence is finite if `toList s` terminates. Equivalently,
it is a finite number of `think` and `cons` applied to `nil`. -/
class IsFinite (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
out : (toList s).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.is_finite Stream'.WSeq.IsFinite
instance toList_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : IsFinite s] : (toList s).Terminates :=
h.out
#align stream.wseq.to_list_terminates Stream'.WSeq.toList_terminates
/-- Get the list corresponding to a finite weak sequence. -/
def get (s : WSeq α) [IsFinite s] : List α :=
(toList s).get
#align stream.wseq.get Stream'.WSeq.get
/-- A weak sequence is *productive* if it never stalls forever - there are
always a finite number of `think`s between `cons` constructors.
The sequence itself is allowed to be infinite though. -/
class Productive (s : WSeq α) : Prop where
get?_terminates : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates
#align stream.wseq.productive Stream'.WSeq.Productive
#align stream.wseq.productive.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.Productive.get?_terminates
theorem productive_iff (s : WSeq α) : Productive s ↔ ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_iff Stream'.WSeq.productive_iff
instance get?_terminates (s : WSeq α) [h : Productive s] : ∀ n, (get? s n).Terminates :=
h.get?_terminates
#align stream.wseq.nth_terminates Stream'.WSeq.get?_terminates
instance head_terminates (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : (head s).Terminates :=
s.get?_terminates 0
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates
/-- Replace the `n`th element of `s` with `a`. -/
def updateNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) (a : α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (some a, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.update_nth Stream'.WSeq.updateNth
/-- Remove the `n`th element of `s`. -/
def removeNth (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s, n with
| none, _ => none
| some (none, s'), n => some (none, n, s')
| some (some a', s'), 0 => some (some a', 0, s')
| some (some _, s'), 1 => some (none, 0, s')
| some (some a', s'), n + 2 => some (some a', n + 1, s'))
(n + 1, s)
#align stream.wseq.remove_nth Stream'.WSeq.removeNth
/-- Map the elements of `s` over `f`, removing any values that yield `none`. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.corec fun s =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, s')
| some (some a, s') => some (f a, s')
#align stream.wseq.filter_map Stream'.WSeq.filterMap
/-- Select the elements of `s` that satisfy `p`. -/
def filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] : WSeq α → WSeq α :=
filterMap fun a => if p a then some a else none
#align stream.wseq.filter Stream'.WSeq.filter
-- example of infinite list manipulations
/-- Get the first element of `s` satisfying `p`. -/
def find (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation (Option α) :=
head <| filter p s
#align stream.wseq.find Stream'.WSeq.find
/-- Zip a function over two weak sequences -/
def zipWith (f : α → β → γ) (s1 : WSeq α) (s2 : WSeq β) : WSeq γ :=
@Seq.corec (Option γ) (WSeq α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some _, _), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some _, _) => some (none, s1', s2)
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some (f a1 a2), s1', s2')
| _, _ => none)
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.zip_with Stream'.WSeq.zipWith
/-- Zip two weak sequences into a single sequence of pairs -/
def zip : WSeq α → WSeq β → WSeq (α × β) :=
zipWith Prod.mk
#align stream.wseq.zip Stream'.WSeq.zip
/-- Get the list of indexes of elements of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndexes (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : WSeq ℕ :=
(zip s (Stream'.nats : WSeq ℕ)).filterMap fun ⟨a, n⟩ => if p a then some n else none
#align stream.wseq.find_indexes Stream'.WSeq.findIndexes
/-- Get the index of the first element of `s` satisfying `p` -/
def findIndex (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : WSeq α) : Computation ℕ :=
(fun o => Option.getD o 0) <$> head (findIndexes p s)
#align stream.wseq.find_index Stream'.WSeq.findIndex
/-- Get the index of the first occurrence of `a` in `s` -/
def indexOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → Computation ℕ :=
findIndex (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.index_of Stream'.WSeq.indexOf
/-- Get the indexes of occurrences of `a` in `s` -/
def indexesOf [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : WSeq α → WSeq ℕ :=
findIndexes (Eq a)
#align stream.wseq.indexes_of Stream'.WSeq.indexesOf
/-- `union s1 s2` is a weak sequence which interleaves `s1` and `s2` in
some order (nondeterministically). -/
def union (s1 s2 : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (WSeq α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨s1, s2⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s1, Seq.destruct s2 with
| none, none => none
| some (a1, s1'), none => some (a1, s1', nil)
| none, some (a2, s2') => some (a2, nil, s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (none, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (none, s2') => some (some a1, s1', s2')
| some (none, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a2, s1', s2')
| some (some a1, s1'), some (some a2, s2') => some (some a1, cons a2 s1', s2'))
(s1, s2)
#align stream.wseq.union Stream'.WSeq.union
/-- Returns `true` if `s` is `nil` and `false` if `s` has an element -/
def isEmpty (s : WSeq α) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.map Option.isNone <| head s
#align stream.wseq.is_empty Stream'.WSeq.isEmpty
/-- Calculate one step of computation -/
def compute (s : WSeq α) : WSeq α :=
match Seq.destruct s with
| some (none, s') => s'
| _ => s
#align stream.wseq.compute Stream'.WSeq.compute
/-- Get the first `n` elements of a weak sequence -/
def take (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : WSeq α :=
@Seq.corec (Option α) (ℕ × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => none
| _ + 1, none => none
| m + 1, some (none, s') => some (none, m + 1, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => some (some a, m, s'))
(n, s)
#align stream.wseq.take Stream'.WSeq.take
/-- Split the sequence at position `n` into a finite initial segment
and the weak sequence tail -/
def splitAt (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : Computation (List α × WSeq α) :=
@Computation.corec (List α × WSeq α) (ℕ × List α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨n, l, s⟩ =>
match n, Seq.destruct s with
| 0, _ => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, none => Sum.inl (l.reverse, s)
| _ + 1, some (none, s') => Sum.inr (n, l, s')
| m + 1, some (some a, s') => Sum.inr (m, a::l, s'))
(n, [], s)
#align stream.wseq.split_at Stream'.WSeq.splitAt
/-- Returns `true` if any element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def any (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl false
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inl true else Sum.inr s')
s
#align stream.wseq.any Stream'.WSeq.any
/-- Returns `true` if every element of `s` satisfies `p` -/
def all (s : WSeq α) (p : α → Bool) : Computation Bool :=
Computation.corec
(fun s : WSeq α =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => Sum.inl true
| some (none, s') => Sum.inr s'
| some (some a, s') => if p a then Sum.inr s' else Sum.inl false)
s
#align stream.wseq.all Stream'.WSeq.all
/-- Apply a function to the elements of the sequence to produce a sequence
of partial results. (There is no `scanr` because this would require
working from the end of the sequence, which may not exist.) -/
def scanl (f : α → β → α) (a : α) (s : WSeq β) : WSeq α :=
cons a <|
@Seq.corec (Option α) (α × WSeq β)
(fun ⟨a, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, a, s')
| some (some b, s') =>
let a' := f a b
some (some a', a', s'))
(a, s)
#align stream.wseq.scanl Stream'.WSeq.scanl
/-- Get the weak sequence of initial segments of the input sequence -/
def inits (s : WSeq α) : WSeq (List α) :=
cons [] <|
@Seq.corec (Option (List α)) (Batteries.DList α × WSeq α)
(fun ⟨l, s⟩ =>
match Seq.destruct s with
| none => none
| some (none, s') => some (none, l, s')
| some (some a, s') =>
let l' := l.push a
some (some l'.toList, l', s'))
(Batteries.DList.empty, s)
#align stream.wseq.inits Stream'.WSeq.inits
/-- Like take, but does not wait for a result. Calculates `n` steps of
computation and returns the sequence computed so far -/
def collect (s : WSeq α) (n : ℕ) : List α :=
(Seq.take n s).filterMap id
#align stream.wseq.collect Stream'.WSeq.collect
/-- Append two weak sequences. As with `Seq.append`, this may not use
the second sequence if the first one takes forever to compute -/
def append : WSeq α → WSeq α → WSeq α :=
Seq.append
#align stream.wseq.append Stream'.WSeq.append
/-- Map a function over a weak sequence -/
def map (f : α → β) : WSeq α → WSeq β :=
Seq.map (Option.map f)
#align stream.wseq.map Stream'.WSeq.map
/-- Flatten a sequence of weak sequences. (Note that this allows
empty sequences, unlike `Seq.join`.) -/
def join (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : WSeq α :=
Seq.join
((fun o : Option (WSeq α) =>
match o with
| none => Seq1.ret none
| some s => (none, s)) <$>
S)
#align stream.wseq.join Stream'.WSeq.join
/-- Monadic bind operator for weak sequences -/
def bind (s : WSeq α) (f : α → WSeq β) : WSeq β :=
join (map f s)
#align stream.wseq.bind Stream'.WSeq.bind
/-- lift a relation to a relation over weak sequences -/
@[simp]
def LiftRelO (R : α → β → Prop) (C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop) :
Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (β × WSeq β) → Prop
| none, none => True
| some (a, s), some (b, t) => R a b ∧ C s t
| _, _ => False
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO
theorem LiftRelO.imp {R S : α → β → Prop} {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop} (H1 : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b)
(H2 : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) : ∀ {o p}, LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO S D o p
| none, none, _ => trivial
| some (_, _), some (_, _), h => And.imp (H1 _ _) (H2 _ _) h
| none, some _, h => False.elim h
| some (_, _), none, h => False.elim h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp
theorem LiftRelO.imp_right (R : α → β → Prop) {C D : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop}
(H : ∀ s t, C s t → D s t) {o p} : LiftRelO R C o p → LiftRelO R D o p :=
LiftRelO.imp (fun _ _ => id) H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.imp_right Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.imp_right
/-- Definition of bisimilarity for weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def BisimO (R : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop) : Option (α × WSeq α) → Option (α × WSeq α) → Prop :=
LiftRelO (· = ·) R
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o Stream'.WSeq.BisimO
theorem BisimO.imp {R S : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop} (H : ∀ s t, R s t → S s t) {o p} :
BisimO R o p → BisimO S o p :=
LiftRelO.imp_right _ H
#align stream.wseq.bisim_o.imp Stream'.WSeq.BisimO.imp
/-- Two weak sequences are `LiftRel R` related if they are either both empty,
or they are both nonempty and the heads are `R` related and the tails are
`LiftRel R` related. (This is a coinductive definition.) -/
def LiftRel (R : α → β → Prop) (s : WSeq α) (t : WSeq β) : Prop :=
∃ C : WSeq α → WSeq β → Prop,
C s t ∧ ∀ {s t}, C s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R C) (destruct s) (destruct t)
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel
/-- If two sequences are equivalent, then they have the same values and
the same computational behavior (i.e. if one loops forever then so does
the other), although they may differ in the number of `think`s needed to
arrive at the answer. -/
def Equiv : WSeq α → WSeq α → Prop :=
LiftRel (· = ·)
#align stream.wseq.equiv Stream'.WSeq.Equiv
theorem liftRel_destruct {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t → Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t)
| ⟨R, h1, h2⟩ => by
refine Computation.LiftRel.imp ?_ _ _ (h2 h1)
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
exact fun s' t' h' => ⟨R, h', @h2⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct
theorem liftRel_destruct_iff {R : α → β → Prop} {s : WSeq α} {t : WSeq β} :
LiftRel R s t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
⟨liftRel_destruct, fun h =>
⟨fun s t =>
LiftRel R s t ∨ Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t),
Or.inr h, fun {s t} h => by
have h : Computation.LiftRel (LiftRelO R (LiftRel R)) (destruct s) (destruct t) := by
cases' h with h h
· exact liftRel_destruct h
· assumption
apply Computation.LiftRel.imp _ _ _ h
intro a b
apply LiftRelO.imp_right
intro s t
apply Or.inl⟩⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_destruct_iff Stream'.WSeq.liftRel_destruct_iff
-- Porting note: To avoid ambiguous notation, `~` became `~ʷ`.
infixl:50 " ~ʷ " => Equiv
theorem destruct_congr {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t → Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr
theorem destruct_congr_iff {s t : WSeq α} :
s ~ʷ t ↔ Computation.LiftRel (BisimO (· ~ʷ ·)) (destruct s) (destruct t) :=
liftRel_destruct_iff
#align stream.wseq.destruct_congr_iff Stream'.WSeq.destruct_congr_iff
theorem LiftRel.refl (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Reflexive R) : Reflexive (LiftRel R) := fun s => by
refine ⟨(· = ·), rfl, fun {s t} (h : s = t) => ?_⟩
rw [← h]
apply Computation.LiftRel.refl
intro a
cases' a with a
· simp
· cases a
simp only [LiftRelO, and_true]
apply H
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.refl Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.refl
theorem LiftRelO.swap (R : α → β → Prop) (C) :
swap (LiftRelO R C) = LiftRelO (swap R) (swap C) := by
funext x y
rcases x with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hx, jx⟩ <;> rcases y with ⟨⟩ | ⟨hy, jy⟩ <;> rfl
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel_o.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRelO.swap
theorem LiftRel.swap_lem {R : α → β → Prop} {s1 s2} (h : LiftRel R s1 s2) :
LiftRel (swap R) s2 s1 := by
refine ⟨swap (LiftRel R), h, fun {s t} (h : LiftRel R t s) => ?_⟩
rw [← LiftRelO.swap, Computation.LiftRel.swap]
apply liftRel_destruct h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap_lem Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap_lem
theorem LiftRel.swap (R : α → β → Prop) : swap (LiftRel R) = LiftRel (swap R) :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => propext ⟨LiftRel.swap_lem, LiftRel.swap_lem⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.swap Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.swap
theorem LiftRel.symm (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Symmetric R) : Symmetric (LiftRel R) :=
fun s1 s2 (h : Function.swap (LiftRel R) s2 s1) => by rwa [LiftRel.swap, H.swap_eq] at h
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.symm Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.symm
theorem LiftRel.trans (R : α → α → Prop) (H : Transitive R) : Transitive (LiftRel R) :=
fun s t u h1 h2 => by
refine ⟨fun s u => ∃ t, LiftRel R s t ∧ LiftRel R t u, ⟨t, h1, h2⟩, fun {s u} h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨t, h1, h2⟩
have h1 := liftRel_destruct h1
have h2 := liftRel_destruct h2
refine
Computation.liftRel_def.2
⟨(Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h1).trans (Computation.terminates_of_liftRel h2),
fun {a c} ha hc => ?_⟩
rcases h1.left ha with ⟨b, hb, t1⟩
have t2 := Computation.rel_of_liftRel h2 hb hc
cases' a with a <;> cases' c with c
· trivial
· cases b
· cases t2
· cases t1
· cases a
cases' b with b
· cases t1
· cases b
cases t2
· cases' a with a s
cases' b with b
· cases t1
cases' b with b t
cases' c with c u
cases' t1 with ab st
cases' t2 with bc tu
exact ⟨H ab bc, t, st, tu⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.trans Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.trans
theorem LiftRel.equiv (R : α → α → Prop) : Equivalence R → Equivalence (LiftRel R)
| ⟨refl, symm, trans⟩ => ⟨LiftRel.refl R refl, @(LiftRel.symm R @symm), @(LiftRel.trans R @trans)⟩
#align stream.wseq.lift_rel.equiv Stream'.WSeq.LiftRel.equiv
@[refl]
theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ s : WSeq α, s ~ʷ s :=
LiftRel.refl (· = ·) Eq.refl
#align stream.wseq.equiv.refl Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.refl
@[symm]
theorem Equiv.symm : ∀ {s t : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ s :=
@(LiftRel.symm (· = ·) (@Eq.symm _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.symm Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
theorem Equiv.trans : ∀ {s t u : WSeq α}, s ~ʷ t → t ~ʷ u → s ~ʷ u :=
@(LiftRel.trans (· = ·) (@Eq.trans _))
#align stream.wseq.equiv.trans Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.trans
theorem Equiv.equivalence : Equivalence (@Equiv α) :=
⟨@Equiv.refl _, @Equiv.symm _, @Equiv.trans _⟩
#align stream.wseq.equiv.equivalence Stream'.WSeq.Equiv.equivalence
open Computation
@[simp]
theorem destruct_nil : destruct (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : destruct (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some (a, s)) :=
Computation.destruct_eq_pure <| by simp [destruct, cons, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : destruct (think s) = (destruct s).think :=
Computation.destruct_eq_think <| by simp [destruct, think, Computation.rmap]
#align stream.wseq.destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_nil : Seq.destruct (nil : WSeq α) = none :=
Seq.destruct_nil
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_nil Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_nil
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_cons (a : α) (s) : Seq.destruct (cons a s) = some (some a, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_cons Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_cons
@[simp]
theorem seq_destruct_think (s : WSeq α) : Seq.destruct (think s) = some (none, s) :=
Seq.destruct_cons _ _
#align stream.wseq.seq_destruct_think Stream'.WSeq.seq_destruct_think
@[simp]
theorem head_nil : head (nil : WSeq α) = Computation.pure none := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_nil Stream'.WSeq.head_nil
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s) : head (cons a s) = Computation.pure (some a) := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_cons Stream'.WSeq.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_think (s : WSeq α) : head (think s) = (head s).think := by simp [head]
#align stream.wseq.head_think Stream'.WSeq.head_think
@[simp]
theorem flatten_pure (s : WSeq α) : flatten (Computation.pure s) = s := by
refine Seq.eq_of_bisim (fun s1 s2 => flatten (Computation.pure s2) = s1) ?_ rfl
intro s' s h
rw [← h]
simp only [Seq.BisimO, flatten, Seq.omap, pure_def, Seq.corec_eq, destruct_pure]
cases Seq.destruct s with
| none => simp
| some val =>
cases' val with o s'
simp
#align stream.wseq.flatten_ret Stream'.WSeq.flatten_pure
@[simp]
theorem flatten_think (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : flatten c.think = think (flatten c) :=
Seq.destruct_eq_cons <| by simp [flatten, think]
#align stream.wseq.flatten_think Stream'.WSeq.flatten_think
@[simp]
theorem destruct_flatten (c : Computation (WSeq α)) : destruct (flatten c) = c >>= destruct := by
refine
Computation.eq_of_bisim
(fun c1 c2 => c1 = c2 ∨ ∃ c, c1 = destruct (flatten c) ∧ c2 = Computation.bind c destruct) ?_
(Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩)
intro c1 c2 h
exact
match c1, c2, h with
| c, _, Or.inl rfl => by cases c.destruct <;> simp
| _, _, Or.inr ⟨c, rfl, rfl⟩ => by
induction' c using Computation.recOn with a c' <;> simp
· cases (destruct a).destruct <;> simp
· exact Or.inr ⟨c', rfl, rfl⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_flatten Stream'.WSeq.destruct_flatten
theorem head_terminates_iff (s : WSeq α) : Terminates (head s) ↔ Terminates (destruct s) :=
terminates_map_iff _ (destruct s)
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_iff Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_iff
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : tail (nil : WSeq α) = nil := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_nil Stream'.WSeq.tail_nil
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s) : tail (cons a s) = s := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_cons Stream'.WSeq.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_think (s : WSeq α) : tail (think s) = (tail s).think := by simp [tail]
#align stream.wseq.tail_think Stream'.WSeq.tail_think
@[simp]
theorem dropn_nil (n) : drop (nil : WSeq α) n = nil := by induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_nil Stream'.WSeq.dropn_nil
@[simp]
theorem dropn_cons (a : α) (s) (n) : drop (cons a s) (n + 1) = drop s n := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [drop]
| succ n n_ih =>
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [*, drop]`.
simp [drop, ← n_ih]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_cons Stream'.WSeq.dropn_cons
@[simp]
theorem dropn_think (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (think s) n = (drop s n).think := by
induction n <;> simp [*, drop]
#align stream.wseq.dropn_think Stream'.WSeq.dropn_think
theorem dropn_add (s : WSeq α) (m) : ∀ n, drop s (m + n) = drop (drop s m) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => congr_arg tail (dropn_add s m n)
#align stream.wseq.dropn_add Stream'.WSeq.dropn_add
theorem dropn_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : drop (tail s) n = drop s (n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
symm
apply dropn_add
#align stream.wseq.dropn_tail Stream'.WSeq.dropn_tail
theorem get?_add (s : WSeq α) (m n) : get? s (m + n) = get? (drop s m) n :=
congr_arg head (dropn_add _ _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_add Stream'.WSeq.get?_add
theorem get?_tail (s : WSeq α) (n) : get? (tail s) n = get? s (n + 1) :=
congr_arg head (dropn_tail _ _)
#align stream.wseq.nth_tail Stream'.WSeq.get?_tail
@[simp]
theorem join_nil : join nil = (nil : WSeq α) :=
Seq.join_nil
#align stream.wseq.join_nil Stream'.WSeq.join_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_think (S : WSeq (WSeq α)) : join (think S) = think (join S) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, Seq1.ret]
#align stream.wseq.join_think Stream'.WSeq.join_think
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s : WSeq α) (S) : join (cons s S) = think (append s (join S)) := by
simp only [join, think]
dsimp only [(· <$> ·)]
simp [join, cons, append]
#align stream.wseq.join_cons Stream'.WSeq.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem nil_append (s : WSeq α) : append nil s = s :=
Seq.nil_append _
#align stream.wseq.nil_append Stream'.WSeq.nil_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_append (a : α) (s t) : append (cons a s) t = cons a (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.cons_append Stream'.WSeq.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem think_append (s t : WSeq α) : append (think s) t = think (append s t) :=
Seq.cons_append _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.think_append Stream'.WSeq.think_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil (s : WSeq α) : append s nil = s :=
Seq.append_nil _
#align stream.wseq.append_nil Stream'.WSeq.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem append_assoc (s t u : WSeq α) : append (append s t) u = append s (append t u) :=
Seq.append_assoc _ _ _
#align stream.wseq.append_assoc Stream'.WSeq.append_assoc
/-- auxiliary definition of tail over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def tail.aux : Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| none => Computation.pure none
| some (_, s) => destruct s
#align stream.wseq.tail.aux Stream'.WSeq.tail.aux
theorem destruct_tail (s : WSeq α) : destruct (tail s) = destruct s >>= tail.aux := by
simp only [tail, destruct_flatten, tail.aux]; rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
apply congr_arg; ext1 (_ | ⟨a, s⟩) <;> apply (@pure_bind Computation _ _ _ _ _ _).trans _ <;> simp
#align stream.wseq.destruct_tail Stream'.WSeq.destruct_tail
/-- auxiliary definition of drop over weak sequences-/
@[simp]
def drop.aux : ℕ → Option (α × WSeq α) → Computation (Option (α × WSeq α))
| 0 => Computation.pure
| n + 1 => fun a => tail.aux a >>= drop.aux n
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux
theorem drop.aux_none : ∀ n, @drop.aux α n none = Computation.pure none
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
show Computation.bind (Computation.pure none) (drop.aux n) = Computation.pure none by
rw [ret_bind, drop.aux_none n]
#align stream.wseq.drop.aux_none Stream'.WSeq.drop.aux_none
theorem destruct_dropn : ∀ (s : WSeq α) (n), destruct (drop s n) = destruct s >>= drop.aux n
| s, 0 => (bind_pure' _).symm
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [← dropn_tail, destruct_dropn _ n, destruct_tail, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
rfl
#align stream.wseq.destruct_dropn Stream'.WSeq.destruct_dropn
theorem head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates (s : WSeq α) [T : Terminates (head (tail s))] :
Terminates (head s) :=
(head_terminates_iff _).2 <| by
rcases (head_terminates_iff _).1 T with ⟨⟨a, h⟩⟩
simp? [tail] at h says simp only [tail, destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨s', h1, _⟩
unfold Functor.map at h1
exact
let ⟨t, h3, _⟩ := Computation.exists_of_mem_map h1
Computation.terminates_of_mem h3
#align stream.wseq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates Stream'.WSeq.head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates
theorem destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ destruct (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ destruct s := by
unfold tail Functor.map at h; simp only [destruct_flatten] at h
rcases exists_of_mem_bind h with ⟨t, tm, td⟩; clear h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map tm with ⟨t', ht', ht2⟩; clear tm
cases' t' with t' <;> rw [← ht2] at td <;> simp only [destruct_nil] at td
· have := mem_unique td (ret_mem _)
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, ht'⟩
#align stream.wseq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_head_tail_some {s : WSeq α} {a} (h : some a ∈ head (tail s)) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
unfold head at h
rcases Computation.exists_of_mem_map h with ⟨o, md, e⟩; clear h
cases' o with o <;> [injection e; injection e with h']; clear h'
cases' destruct_some_of_destruct_tail_some md with a am
exact ⟨_, Computation.mem_map (@Prod.fst α (WSeq α) <$> ·) am⟩
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_head_tail_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_head_tail_some
theorem head_some_of_get?_some {s : WSeq α} {a n} (h : some a ∈ get? s n) :
∃ a', some a' ∈ head s := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => exact ⟨_, h⟩
| succ n IH =>
let ⟨a', h'⟩ := head_some_of_head_tail_some h
exact IH h'
#align stream.wseq.head_some_of_nth_some Stream'.WSeq.head_some_of_get?_some
instance productive_tail (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Productive (tail s) :=
⟨fun n => by rw [get?_tail]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_tail Stream'.WSeq.productive_tail
instance productive_dropn (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] (n) : Productive (drop s n) :=
⟨fun m => by rw [← get?_add]; infer_instance⟩
#align stream.wseq.productive_dropn Stream'.WSeq.productive_dropn
/-- Given a productive weak sequence, we can collapse all the `think`s to
produce a sequence. -/
def toSeq (s : WSeq α) [Productive s] : Seq α :=
⟨fun n => (get? s n).get,
fun {n} h => by
cases e : Computation.get (get? s (n + 1))
· assumption
have := Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ e
simp? [get?] at this h says simp only [get?] at this h
cases' head_some_of_head_tail_some this with a' h'
have := mem_unique h' (@Computation.mem_of_get_eq _ _ _ _ h)
contradiction⟩
#align stream.wseq.to_seq Stream'.WSeq.toSeq
| Mathlib/Data/Seq/WSeq.lean | 893 | 896 | theorem get?_terminates_le {s : WSeq α} {m n} (h : m ≤ n) :
Terminates (get? s n) → Terminates (get? s m) := by |
induction' h with m' _ IH
exacts [id, fun T => IH (@head_terminates_of_head_tail_terminates _ _ T)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import number_theory.multiplicity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
_root_.map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub'
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_self {x y : R} (h : ↑n ∣ x - y) :
↑n ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub h).mpr (dvd_mul_right _ _)
#align dvd_geom_sum₂_self dvd_geom_sum₂_self
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 56 | 71 | theorem sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (p x : R) (n : ℕ) :
p ^ 2 ∣ (x + p) ^ n - x ^ (n - 1) * p * n - x ^ n := by |
cases' n with n n
· simp only [pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, sub_zero, sub_self, dvd_zero, Nat.zero_eq, mul_zero]
· simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, Nat.cast_succ, add_pow, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Nat.choose_self, Nat.succ_sub _, tsub_self, pow_one, Nat.choose_succ_self_right, pow_zero,
mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_left]
suffices p ^ 2 ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * p ^ (n + 1 - i) * ↑((n + 1).choose i) by
convert this; abel
apply Finset.dvd_sum
intro y hy
calc
p ^ 2 ∣ p ^ (n + 1 - y) :=
pow_dvd_pow p (le_tsub_of_add_le_left (by linarith [Finset.mem_range.mp hy]))
_ ∣ x ^ y * p ^ (n + 1 - y) * ↑((n + 1).choose y) :=
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left _ _) _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.lagrange from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < s.card)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
#align polynomial.eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq Polynomial.eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < s.card) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
#align polynomial.eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq Polynomial.eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ s.card)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < s.card) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
#align polynomial.eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq Polynomial.eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < s.card) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq _ hvs ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt ⊢
exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
#align polynomial.eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq Polynomial.eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_index_eq
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ s.card)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) : f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq s hvs
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le)
h_eval
end Indexed
end Polynomial
end PolynomialDetermination
noncomputable section
namespace Lagrange
open Polynomial
section BasisDivisor
variable {F : Type*} [Field F]
variable {x y : F}
/-- `basisDivisor x y` is the unique linear or constant polynomial such that
when evaluated at `x` it gives `1` and `y` it gives `0` (where when `x = y` it is identically `0`).
Such polynomials are the building blocks for the Lagrange interpolants. -/
def basisDivisor (x y : F) : F[X] :=
C (x - y)⁻¹ * (X - C y)
#align lagrange.basis_divisor Lagrange.basisDivisor
theorem basisDivisor_self : basisDivisor x x = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, sub_self, inv_zero, map_zero, zero_mul]
#align lagrange.basis_divisor_self Lagrange.basisDivisor_self
theorem basisDivisor_inj (hxy : basisDivisor x y = 0) : x = y := by
simp_rw [basisDivisor, mul_eq_zero, X_sub_C_ne_zero, or_false_iff, C_eq_zero, inv_eq_zero,
sub_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxy
#align lagrange.basis_divisor_inj Lagrange.basisDivisor_inj
@[simp]
theorem basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y = 0 ↔ x = y :=
⟨basisDivisor_inj, fun H => H ▸ basisDivisor_self⟩
#align lagrange.basis_divisor_eq_zero_iff Lagrange.basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff
theorem basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff : basisDivisor x y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ y := by
rw [Ne, basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff]
#align lagrange.basis_divisor_ne_zero_iff Lagrange.basisDivisor_ne_zero_iff
theorem degree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).degree = 1 := by
rw [basisDivisor, degree_mul, degree_X_sub_C, degree_C, zero_add]
exact inv_ne_zero (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
#align lagrange.degree_basis_divisor_of_ne Lagrange.degree_basisDivisor_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem degree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).degree = ⊥ := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, degree_zero]
#align lagrange.degree_basis_divisor_self Lagrange.degree_basisDivisor_self
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_self : (basisDivisor x x).natDegree = 0 := by
rw [basisDivisor_self, natDegree_zero]
#align lagrange.nat_degree_basis_divisor_self Lagrange.natDegree_basisDivisor_self
theorem natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : (basisDivisor x y).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_basisDivisor_of_ne hxy)
#align lagrange.nat_degree_basis_divisor_of_ne Lagrange.natDegree_basisDivisor_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eval_basisDivisor_right : eval y (basisDivisor x y) = 0 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X, sub_self, mul_zero]
#align lagrange.eval_basis_divisor_right Lagrange.eval_basisDivisor_right
theorem eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne (hxy : x ≠ y) : eval x (basisDivisor x y) = 1 := by
simp only [basisDivisor, eval_mul, eval_C, eval_sub, eval_X]
exact inv_mul_cancel (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxy)
#align lagrange.eval_basis_divisor_left_of_ne Lagrange.eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne
end BasisDivisor
section Basis
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
variable {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → F} {i j : ι}
open Finset
/-- Lagrange basis polynomials indexed by `s : Finset ι`, defined at nodes `v i` for a
map `v : ι → F`. For `i, j ∈ s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 0 at `v j` for `i ≠ j`. When
`v` is injective on `s`, `basis s v i` evaluates to 1 at `v i`. -/
protected def basis (s : Finset ι) (v : ι → F) (i : ι) : F[X] :=
∏ j ∈ s.erase i, basisDivisor (v i) (v j)
#align lagrange.basis Lagrange.basis
@[simp]
theorem basis_empty : Lagrange.basis ∅ v i = 1 :=
rfl
#align lagrange.basis_empty Lagrange.basis_empty
@[simp]
theorem basis_singleton (i : ι) : Lagrange.basis {i} v i = 1 := by
rw [Lagrange.basis, erase_singleton, prod_empty]
#align lagrange.basis_singleton Lagrange.basis_singleton
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_left (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v i = basisDivisor (v i) (v j) := by
simp only [Lagrange.basis, hij, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem, mem_singleton,
not_false_iff, prod_singleton]
#align lagrange.basis_pair_left Lagrange.basis_pair_left
@[simp]
theorem basis_pair_right (hij : i ≠ j) : Lagrange.basis {i, j} v j = basisDivisor (v j) (v i) := by
rw [pair_comm]
exact basis_pair_left hij.symm
#align lagrange.basis_pair_right Lagrange.basis_pair_right
theorem basis_ne_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) : Lagrange.basis s v i ≠ 0 := by
simp_rw [Lagrange.basis, prod_ne_zero_iff, Ne, mem_erase]
rintro j ⟨hij, hj⟩
rw [basisDivisor_eq_zero_iff, hvs.eq_iff hi hj]
exact hij.symm
#align lagrange.basis_ne_zero Lagrange.basis_ne_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 246 | 252 | theorem eval_basis_self (hvs : Set.InjOn v s) (hi : i ∈ s) :
(Lagrange.basis s v i).eval (v i) = 1 := by |
rw [Lagrange.basis, eval_prod]
refine prod_eq_one fun j H => ?_
rw [eval_basisDivisor_left_of_ne]
rcases mem_erase.mp H with ⟨hij, hj⟩
exact mt (hvs hi hj) hij.symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Canonical
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Set.List
import Mathlib.Init.Quot
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
#align_import data.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Multisets
These are implemented as the quotient of a list by permutations.
## Notation
We define the global infix notation `::ₘ` for `Multiset.cons`.
-/
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Multiset α` is the quotient of `List α` by list permutation. The result
is a type of finite sets with duplicates allowed. -/
def Multiset.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quotient (List.isSetoid α)
#align multiset Multiset
namespace Multiset
-- Porting note: new
/-- The quotient map from `List α` to `Multiset α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofList : List α → Multiset α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Multiset α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk (· ≈ ·) l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk Setoid.r l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe''
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
Quotient.eq
#align multiset.coe_eq_coe Multiset.coe_eq_coe
-- Porting note: new instance;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: move to better place
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ ≈ l₂) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (l₁ ~ l₂))
-- Porting note: `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂` was in parens which broke elaboration
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Multiset α)
| s₁, s₂ => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq
#align multiset.has_decidable_eq Multiset.decidableEq
/-- defines a size for a multiset by referring to the size of the underlying list -/
protected
def sizeOf [SizeOf α] (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
(Quot.liftOn s SizeOf.sizeOf) fun _ _ => Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
#align multiset.sizeof Multiset.sizeOf
instance [SizeOf α] : SizeOf (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sizeOf⟩
/-! ### Empty multiset -/
/-- `0 : Multiset α` is the empty set -/
protected def zero : Multiset α :=
@nil α
#align multiset.zero Multiset.zero
instance : Zero (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.zero⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedMultiset : Inhabited (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align multiset.inhabited_multiset Multiset.inhabitedMultiset
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Multiset α) where
default := 0
uniq := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, l⟩⟩; exacts [rfl, isEmptyElim a]
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : (@nil α : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_nil Multiset.coe_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.empty_eq_zero Multiset.empty_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_zero (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
Iff.trans coe_eq_coe perm_nil
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero Multiset.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l.isEmpty :=
Iff.trans (coe_eq_zero l) isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.symm
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_empty Multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
/-! ### `Multiset.cons` -/
/-- `cons a s` is the multiset which contains `s` plus one more instance of `a`. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (a :: l : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.cons a)
#align multiset.cons Multiset.cons
@[inherit_doc Multiset.cons]
infixr:67 " ::ₘ " => Multiset.cons
instance : Insert α (Multiset α) :=
⟨cons⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : insert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.insert_eq_cons Multiset.insert_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : List α) : (a ::ₘ l : Multiset α) = (a :: l : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_coe Multiset.cons_coe
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun l e =>
have : [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l := Quotient.exact e
singleton_perm_singleton.1 <| (perm_append_right_iff _).1 this,
congr_arg (· ::ₘ _)⟩
#align multiset.cons_inj_left Multiset.cons_inj_left
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) : ∀ {s t : Multiset α}, a ::ₘ s = a ::ₘ t ↔ s = t := by
rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩; simp
#align multiset.cons_inj_right Multiset.cons_inj_right
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {p : Multiset α → Prop} (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : ∀ s, p s := by
rintro ⟨l⟩; induction' l with _ _ ih <;> [exact empty; exact cons _ _ ih]
#align multiset.induction Multiset.induction
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.induction empty cons s
#align multiset.induction_on Multiset.induction_on
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ b ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Perm.swap _ _ _
#align multiset.cons_swap Multiset.cons_swap
section Rec
variable {C : Multiset α → Sort*}
/-- Dependent recursor on multisets.
TODO: should be @[recursor 6], but then the definition of `Multiset.pi` fails with a stack
overflow in `whnf`.
-/
protected
def rec (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b)))
(m : Multiset α) : C m :=
Quotient.hrecOn m (@List.rec α (fun l => C ⟦l⟧) C_0 fun a l b => C_cons a ⟦l⟧ b) fun l l' h =>
h.rec_heq
(fun hl _ ↦ by congr 1; exact Quot.sound hl)
(C_cons_heq _ _ ⟦_⟧ _)
#align multiset.rec Multiset.rec
/-- Companion to `Multiset.rec` with more convenient argument order. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected
def recOn (m : Multiset α) (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))) :
C m :=
Multiset.rec C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq m
#align multiset.rec_on Multiset.recOn
variable {C_0 : C 0} {C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m)}
{C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))}
@[simp]
theorem recOn_0 : @Multiset.recOn α C (0 : Multiset α) C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_0 Multiset.recOn_0
@[simp]
theorem recOn_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_cons a m (m.recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq) :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_cons Multiset.recOn_cons
end Rec
section Mem
/-- `a ∈ s` means that `a` has nonzero multiplicity in `s`. -/
def Mem (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun l₁ l₂ (e : l₁ ~ l₂) => propext <| e.mem_iff
#align multiset.mem Multiset.Mem
instance : Membership α (Multiset α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (l : Multiset α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.mem_coe Multiset.mem_coe
instance decidableMem [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l ↦ inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ l))
#align multiset.decidable_mem Multiset.decidableMem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.mem_cons
#align multiset.mem_cons Multiset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_cons_of_mem Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ∈ a ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align multiset.mem_cons_self Multiset.mem_cons_self
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ a ::ₘ s, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _ => List.forall_mem_cons
#align multiset.forall_mem_cons Multiset.forall_mem_cons
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → ∃ t, s = a ::ₘ t :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l (h : a ∈ l) =>
let ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩ := append_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ ⟨(l₁ ++ l₂ : List α), Quot.sound perm_middle⟩
#align multiset.exists_cons_of_mem Multiset.exists_cons_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (a : α) : a ∉ (0 : Multiset α) :=
List.not_mem_nil _
#align multiset.not_mem_zero Multiset.not_mem_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∉ s) → s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => by rw [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr H]; rfl
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : s = 0 ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ fun _ => not_mem_zero _, eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem⟩
#align multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_zero {s : Multiset α} : s ≠ 0 → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l hl =>
match l, hl with
| [], h => False.elim <| h rfl
| a :: l, _ => ⟨a, by simp⟩
#align multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
theorem empty_or_exists_mem (s : Multiset α) : s = 0 ∨ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
#align multiset.empty_or_exists_mem Multiset.empty_or_exists_mem
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_cons {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : 0 ≠ a ::ₘ m := fun h =>
have : a ∈ (0 : Multiset α) := h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
not_mem_zero _ this
#align multiset.zero_ne_cons Multiset.zero_ne_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_ne_zero {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ m ≠ 0 :=
zero_ne_cons.symm
#align multiset.cons_ne_zero Multiset.cons_ne_zero
theorem cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {as bs : Multiset α} :
a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ bs ↔ a = b ∧ as = bs ∨ a ≠ b ∧ ∃ cs, as = b ::ₘ cs ∧ bs = a ::ₘ cs := by
haveI : DecidableEq α := Classical.decEq α
constructor
· intro eq
by_cases h : a = b
· subst h
simp_all
· have : a ∈ b ::ₘ bs := eq ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
have : a ∈ bs := by simpa [h]
rcases exists_cons_of_mem this with ⟨cs, hcs⟩
simp only [h, hcs, false_and, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true, cons_inj_right, exists_eq_right',
true_and, false_or]
have : a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ cs := by simp [eq, hcs]
have : a ::ₘ as = a ::ₘ b ::ₘ cs := by rwa [cons_swap]
simpa using this
· intro h
rcases h with (⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨_, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩)
· simp [*]
· simp [*, cons_swap a b]
#align multiset.cons_eq_cons Multiset.cons_eq_cons
end Mem
/-! ### Singleton -/
instance : Singleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun a => a ::ₘ 0⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero (a : α) : a ::ₘ 0 = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_zero Multiset.cons_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : ([a] : Multiset α) = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_singleton Multiset.coe_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) ↔ b = a := by
simp only [← cons_zero, mem_cons, iff_self_iff, or_false_iff, not_mem_zero]
#align multiset.mem_singleton Multiset.mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) := by
rw [← cons_zero]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.mem_singleton_self Multiset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : ({a} : Multiset α) = {b} ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [← cons_zero]
exact cons_inj_left _
#align multiset.singleton_inj Multiset.singleton_inj
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : (l : Multiset α) = {a} ↔ l = [a] := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_eq_coe, List.perm_singleton]
#align multiset.coe_eq_singleton Multiset.coe_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_cons_iff {a b : α} (m : Multiset α) : {a} = b ::ₘ m ↔ a = b ∧ m = 0 := by
rw [← cons_zero, cons_eq_cons]
simp [eq_comm]
#align multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff Multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff
theorem pair_comm (x y : α) : ({x, y} : Multiset α) = {y, x} :=
cons_swap x y 0
#align multiset.pair_comm Multiset.pair_comm
/-! ### `Multiset.Subset` -/
section Subset
variable {s : Multiset α} {a : α}
/-- `s ⊆ t` is the lift of the list subset relation. It means that any
element with nonzero multiplicity in `s` has nonzero multiplicity in `t`,
but it does not imply that the multiplicity of `a` in `s` is less or equal than in `t`;
see `s ≤ t` for this relation. -/
protected def Subset (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t
#align multiset.subset Multiset.Subset
instance : HasSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.Subset⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance instIsNonstrictStrictOrder : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Multiset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) where
right_iff_left_not_left _ _ := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ⊆ l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_subset Multiset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Multiset α) : s ⊆ s := fun _ h => h
#align multiset.subset.refl Multiset.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.trans {s t u : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → t ⊆ u → s ⊆ u := fun h₁ h₂ _ m => h₂ (h₁ m)
#align multiset.subset.trans Multiset.Subset.trans
theorem subset_iff {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.subset_iff Multiset.subset_iff
theorem mem_of_subset {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
@h _
#align multiset.mem_of_subset Multiset.mem_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem zero_subset (s : Multiset α) : 0 ⊆ s := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
#align multiset.zero_subset Multiset.zero_subset
theorem subset_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ⊆ a ::ₘ s := fun _ => mem_cons_of_mem
#align multiset.subset_cons Multiset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons {s : Multiset α} {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ a ::ₘ s :=
⟨subset_cons _ _, fun h => ha <| h <| mem_cons_self _ _⟩
#align multiset.ssubset_cons Multiset.ssubset_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp [subset_iff, or_imp, forall_and]
#align multiset.cons_subset Multiset.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_cons {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → a ::ₘ s ⊆ a ::ₘ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => List.cons_subset_cons _
#align multiset.cons_subset_cons Multiset.cons_subset_cons
theorem eq_zero_of_subset_zero {s : Multiset α} (h : s ⊆ 0) : s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem fun _ hx ↦ not_mem_zero _ (h hx)
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero Multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero
@[simp] lemma subset_zero : s ⊆ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_subset_zero, fun xeq => xeq.symm ▸ Subset.refl 0⟩
#align multiset.subset_zero Multiset.subset_zero
@[simp] lemma zero_ssubset : 0 ⊂ s ↔ s ≠ 0 := by simp [ssubset_iff_subset_not_subset]
@[simp] lemma singleton_subset : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [subset_iff]
theorem induction_on' {p : Multiset α → Prop} (S : Multiset α) (h₁ : p 0)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Multiset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ hps hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := cons_subset.1 hs
h₂ hS sS (hps sS))
(Subset.refl S)
#align multiset.induction_on' Multiset.induction_on'
end Subset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out'
#align multiset.to_list Multiset.toList
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
#align multiset.coe_to_list Multiset.coe_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_nil Multiset.toList_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 :=
isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.trans toList_eq_nil
#align multiset.empty_to_list Multiset.empty_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
#align multiset.to_list_zero Multiset.toList_zero
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
#align multiset.mem_to_list Multiset.mem_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_singleton_iff Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
#align multiset.to_list_singleton Multiset.toList_singleton
end ToList
/-! ### Partial order on `Multiset`s -/
/-- `s ≤ t` means that `s` is a sublist of `t` (up to permutation).
Equivalently, `s ≤ t` means that `count a s ≤ count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def Le (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s t (· <+~ ·)) fun _ _ _ _ p₁ p₂ =>
propext (p₂.subperm_left.trans p₁.subperm_right)
#align multiset.le Multiset.Le
instance : PartialOrder (Multiset α) where
le := Multiset.Le
le_refl := by rintro ⟨l⟩; exact Subperm.refl _
le_trans := by rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ ⟨l₃⟩; exact @Subperm.trans _ _ _ _
le_antisymm := by rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ h₁ h₂; exact Quot.sound (Subperm.antisymm h₁ h₂)
instance decidableLE [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : Multiset α → Multiset α → Prop) :=
fun s t => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s t List.decidableSubperm
#align multiset.decidable_le Multiset.decidableLE
section
variable {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
theorem subset_of_le : s ≤ t → s ⊆ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => Subperm.subset
#align multiset.subset_of_le Multiset.subset_of_le
alias Le.subset := subset_of_le
#align multiset.le.subset Multiset.Le.subset
theorem mem_of_le (h : s ≤ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
mem_of_subset (subset_of_le h)
#align multiset.mem_of_le Multiset.mem_of_le
theorem not_mem_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align multiset.not_mem_mono Multiset.not_mem_mono
@[simp]
theorem coe_le {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ≤ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_le Multiset.coe_le
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem leInductionOn {C : Multiset α → Multiset α → Prop} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t)
(H : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → C l₁ l₂) : C s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t (fun l₁ _ ⟨l, p, s⟩ => (show ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l₁⟧ from Quot.sound p) ▸ H s) h
#align multiset.le_induction_on Multiset.leInductionOn
theorem zero_le (s : Multiset α) : 0 ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => (nil_sublist l).subperm
#align multiset.zero_le Multiset.zero_le
instance : OrderBot (Multiset α) where
bot := 0
bot_le := zero_le
/-- This is a `rfl` and `simp` version of `bot_eq_zero`. -/
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.bot_eq_zero Multiset.bot_eq_zero
theorem le_zero : s ≤ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
#align multiset.le_zero Multiset.le_zero
theorem lt_cons_self (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s < a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l =>
suffices l <+~ a :: l ∧ ¬l ~ a :: l by simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
⟨(sublist_cons _ _).subperm, fun p => _root_.ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self (length l)) p.length_eq⟩
#align multiset.lt_cons_self Multiset.lt_cons_self
theorem le_cons_self (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a ::ₘ s :=
le_of_lt <| lt_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.le_cons_self Multiset.le_cons_self
theorem cons_le_cons_iff (a : α) : a ::ₘ s ≤ a ::ₘ t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => subperm_cons a
#align multiset.cons_le_cons_iff Multiset.cons_le_cons_iff
theorem cons_le_cons (a : α) : s ≤ t → a ::ₘ s ≤ a ::ₘ t :=
(cons_le_cons_iff a).2
#align multiset.cons_le_cons Multiset.cons_le_cons
@[simp] lemma cons_lt_cons_iff : a ::ₘ s < a ::ₘ t ↔ s < t :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (cons_le_cons_iff _) (cons_le_cons_iff _)
lemma cons_lt_cons (a : α) (h : s < t) : a ::ₘ s < a ::ₘ t := cons_lt_cons_iff.2 h
theorem le_cons_of_not_mem (m : a ∉ s) : s ≤ a ::ₘ t ↔ s ≤ t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => le_trans h <| le_cons_self _ _⟩
suffices ∀ {t'}, s ≤ t' → a ∈ t' → a ::ₘ s ≤ t' by
exact fun h => (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this h (mem_cons_self _ _))
introv h
revert m
refine leInductionOn h ?_
introv s m₁ m₂
rcases append_of_mem m₂ with ⟨r₁, r₂, rfl⟩
exact
perm_middle.subperm_left.2
((subperm_cons _).2 <| ((sublist_or_mem_of_sublist s).resolve_right m₁).subperm)
#align multiset.le_cons_of_not_mem Multiset.le_cons_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_zero (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (lt_cons_self _ _)
#align multiset.singleton_ne_zero Multiset.singleton_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem singleton_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : {a} ≤ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => mem_of_le h (mem_singleton_self _), fun h =>
let ⟨_t, e⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ cons_le_cons _ (zero_le _)⟩
#align multiset.singleton_le Multiset.singleton_le
@[simp] lemma le_singleton : s ≤ {a} ↔ s = 0 ∨ s = {a} :=
Quot.induction_on s fun l ↦ by simp only [cons_zero, ← coe_singleton, quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_le,
coe_eq_zero, coe_eq_coe, perm_singleton, subperm_singleton_iff]
@[simp] lemma lt_singleton : s < {a} ↔ s = 0 := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_singleton, or_and_right, Ne, and_not_self, or_false,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl
exact (singleton_ne_zero _).symm
@[simp] lemma ssubset_singleton_iff : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs ↦ eq_zero_of_subset_zero fun b hb ↦ (hs.2 ?_).elim, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl := mem_singleton.1 (hs.1 hb)
rwa [singleton_subset]
· rintro rfl
simp
end
/-! ### Additive monoid -/
/-- The sum of two multisets is the lift of the list append operation.
This adds the multiplicities of each element,
i.e. `count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t`. -/
protected def add (s₁ s₂ : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s₁ s₂ fun l₁ l₂ => ((l₁ ++ l₂ : List α) : Multiset α)) fun _ _ _ _ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.append p₂
#align multiset.add Multiset.add
instance : Add (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.add⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (s t : List α) : (s + t : Multiset α) = (s ++ t : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_add Multiset.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem singleton_add (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : {a} + s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.singleton_add Multiset.singleton_add
private theorem add_le_add_iff_left' {s t u : Multiset α} : s + t ≤ s + u ↔ t ≤ u :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ s t u fun _ _ _ => subperm_append_left _
instance : CovariantClass (Multiset α) (Multiset α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _s _t _u => add_le_add_iff_left'.2⟩
instance : ContravariantClass (Multiset α) (Multiset α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _s _t _u => add_le_add_iff_left'.1⟩
instance : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid (Multiset α) where
zero := 0
add := (· + ·)
add_comm := fun s t => Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => Quot.sound perm_append_comm
add_assoc := fun s₁ s₂ s₃ =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ fun l₁ l₂ l₃ => congr_arg _ <| append_assoc l₁ l₂ l₃
zero_add := fun s => Quot.inductionOn s fun l => rfl
add_zero := fun s => Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| append_nil l
add_le_add_left := fun s₁ s₂ => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun s₁ s₂ s₃ => le_of_add_le_add_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
theorem le_add_right (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ s + t := by simpa using add_le_add_left (zero_le t) s
#align multiset.le_add_right Multiset.le_add_right
theorem le_add_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ t + s := by simpa using add_le_add_right (zero_le t) s
#align multiset.le_add_left Multiset.le_add_left
theorem le_iff_exists_add {s t : Multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∃ u, t = s + u :=
⟨fun h =>
leInductionOn h fun s =>
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append
⟨l, Quot.sound p⟩,
fun ⟨_u, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ le_add_right _ _⟩
#align multiset.le_iff_exists_add Multiset.le_iff_exists_add
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid (Multiset α) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset α))
le_self_add := le_add_right
exists_add_of_le h := leInductionOn h fun s =>
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append
⟨l, Quot.sound p⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_add (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s + t = a ::ₘ (s + t) := by
rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_assoc]
#align multiset.cons_add Multiset.cons_add
@[simp]
theorem add_cons (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : s + a ::ₘ t = a ::ₘ (s + t) := by
rw [add_comm, cons_add, add_comm]
#align multiset.add_cons Multiset.add_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_add {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ∈ s + t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => mem_append
#align multiset.mem_add Multiset.mem_add
theorem mem_of_mem_nsmul {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ n • s) : a ∈ s := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [zero_nsmul] at h
exact absurd h (not_mem_zero _)
· rw [succ_nsmul, mem_add] at h
exact h.elim ih id
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_nsmul Multiset.mem_of_mem_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem mem_nsmul {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) : a ∈ n • s ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_nsmul, fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h0
rw [succ_nsmul, mem_add]
exact Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_nsmul Multiset.mem_nsmul
theorem nsmul_cons {s : Multiset α} (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
n • (a ::ₘ s) = n • ({a} : Multiset α) + n • s := by
rw [← singleton_add, nsmul_add]
#align multiset.nsmul_cons Multiset.nsmul_cons
/-! ### Cardinality -/
/-- The cardinality of a multiset is the sum of the multiplicities
of all its elements, or simply the length of the underlying list. -/
def card : Multiset α →+ ℕ where
toFun s := (Quot.liftOn s length) fun _l₁ _l₂ => Perm.length_eq
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' s t := Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t length_append
#align multiset.card Multiset.card
@[simp]
theorem coe_card (l : List α) : card (l : Multiset α) = length l :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_card Multiset.coe_card
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
#align multiset.length_to_list Multiset.length_toList
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): `dsimp` can not prove this, yet linter complains
theorem card_zero : @card α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.card_zero Multiset.card_zero
theorem card_add (s t : Multiset α) : card (s + t) = card s + card t :=
card.map_add s t
#align multiset.card_add Multiset.card_add
theorem card_nsmul (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) : card (n • s) = n * card s := by
rw [card.map_nsmul s n, Nat.nsmul_eq_mul]
#align multiset.card_nsmul Multiset.card_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : card (a ::ₘ s) = card s + 1 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.card_cons Multiset.card_cons
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Multiset α) = 1 := by
simp only [← cons_zero, card_zero, eq_self_iff_true, zero_add, card_cons]
#align multiset.card_singleton Multiset.card_singleton
theorem card_pair (a b : α) : card {a, b} = 2 := by
rw [insert_eq_cons, card_cons, card_singleton]
#align multiset.card_pair Multiset.card_pair
theorem card_eq_one {s : Multiset α} : card s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => (List.length_eq_one.1 h).imp fun _a => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_one Multiset.card_eq_one
theorem card_le_card {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card s ≤ card t :=
leInductionOn h Sublist.length_le
#align multiset.card_le_of_le Multiset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := fun _a _b => card_le_card
#align multiset.card_mono Multiset.card_mono
theorem eq_of_le_of_card_le {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card t ≤ card s → s = t :=
leInductionOn h fun s h₂ => congr_arg _ <| s.eq_of_length_le h₂
#align multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le
theorem card_lt_card {s t : Multiset α} (h : s < t) : card s < card t :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h₂ => _root_.ne_of_lt h <| eq_of_le_of_card_le (le_of_lt h) h₂
#align multiset.card_lt_card Multiset.card_lt_card
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Multiset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem lt_iff_cons_le {s t : Multiset α} : s < t ↔ ∃ a, a ::ₘ s ≤ t :=
⟨Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h =>
Subperm.exists_of_length_lt (le_of_lt h) (card_lt_card h),
fun ⟨_a, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_cons_self _ _) h⟩
#align multiset.lt_iff_cons_le Multiset.lt_iff_cons_le
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => (eq_of_le_of_card_le (zero_le _) (le_of_eq h)).symm, fun e => by simp [e]⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_zero Multiset.card_eq_zero
theorem card_pos {s : Multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr card_eq_zero
#align multiset.card_pos Multiset.card_pos
theorem card_pos_iff_exists_mem {s : Multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_pos_iff_exists_mem
#align multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem Multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem
theorem card_eq_two {s : Multiset α} : card s = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, s = {x, y} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h =>
(List.length_eq_two.mp h).imp fun _a => Exists.imp fun _b => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, _b, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_two Multiset.card_eq_two
theorem card_eq_three {s : Multiset α} : card s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, s = {x, y, z} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h =>
(List.length_eq_three.mp h).imp fun _a =>
Exists.imp fun _b => Exists.imp fun _c => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, _b, _c, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_three Multiset.card_eq_three
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
#align multiset.strong_induction_on Multiset.strongInductionOnₓ -- Porting note: reorderd universes
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
#align multiset.strong_induction_eq Multiset.strongInductionOn_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.case_strong_induction_on Multiset.case_strongInductionOn
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
-- Porting note: reorderd universes
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction Multiset.strongDownwardInductionₓ
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_eq Multiset.strongDownwardInduction_eq
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_on Multiset.strongDownwardInductionOn
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_on_eq Multiset.strongDownwardInductionOn_eq
#align multiset.well_founded_lt wellFounded_lt
/-- Another way of expressing `strongInductionOn`: the `(<)` relation is well-founded. -/
instance instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Multiset α) :=
⟨Subrelation.wf Multiset.card_lt_card (measure Multiset.card).2⟩
#align multiset.is_well_founded_lt Multiset.instWellFoundedLT
/-! ### `Multiset.replicate` -/
/-- `replicate n a` is the multiset containing only `a` with multiplicity `n`. -/
def replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Multiset α :=
List.replicate n a
#align multiset.replicate Multiset.replicate
theorem coe_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : (List.replicate n a : Multiset α) = replicate n a := rfl
#align multiset.coe_replicate Multiset.coe_replicate
@[simp] theorem replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = 0 := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_zero Multiset.replicate_zero
@[simp] theorem replicate_succ (a : α) (n) : replicate (n + 1) a = a ::ₘ replicate n a := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_succ Multiset.replicate_succ
theorem replicate_add (m n : ℕ) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a + replicate n a :=
congr_arg _ <| List.replicate_add ..
#align multiset.replicate_add Multiset.replicate_add
/-- `Multiset.replicate` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def replicateAddMonoidHom (a : α) : ℕ →+ Multiset α where
toFun := fun n => replicate n a
map_zero' := replicate_zero a
map_add' := fun _ _ => replicate_add _ _ a
#align multiset.replicate_add_monoid_hom Multiset.replicateAddMonoidHom
#align multiset.replicate_add_monoid_hom_apply Multiset.replicateAddMonoidHom_apply
theorem replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = {a} := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_one Multiset.replicate_one
@[simp] theorem card_replicate (n) (a : α) : card (replicate n a) = n :=
length_replicate n a
#align multiset.card_replicate Multiset.card_replicate
theorem mem_replicate {a b : α} {n : ℕ} : b ∈ replicate n a ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a :=
List.mem_replicate
#align multiset.mem_replicate Multiset.mem_replicate
theorem eq_of_mem_replicate {a b : α} {n} : b ∈ replicate n a → b = a :=
List.eq_of_mem_replicate
#align multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_card {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : s = replicate (card s) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => coe_eq_coe.trans <| perm_replicate.trans eq_replicate_length
#align multiset.eq_replicate_card Multiset.eq_replicate_card
alias ⟨_, eq_replicate_of_mem⟩ := eq_replicate_card
#align multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem Multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem
theorem eq_replicate {a : α} {n} {s : Multiset α} :
s = replicate n a ↔ card s = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨card_replicate _ _, fun _b => eq_of_mem_replicate⟩,
fun ⟨e, al⟩ => e ▸ eq_replicate_of_mem al⟩
#align multiset.eq_replicate Multiset.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align multiset.replicate_right_injective Multiset.replicate_right_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective h).eq_iff
#align multiset.replicate_right_inj Multiset.replicate_right_inj
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
-- Porting note: was `fun m n h => by rw [← (eq_replicate.1 h).1, card_replicate]`
LeftInverse.injective (card_replicate · a)
#align multiset.replicate_left_injective Multiset.replicate_left_injective
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n : ℕ) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ {a} :=
List.replicate_subset_singleton n a
#align multiset.replicate_subset_singleton Multiset.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem replicate_le_coe {a : α} {n} {l : List α} : replicate n a ≤ l ↔ List.replicate n a <+ l :=
⟨fun ⟨_l', p, s⟩ => perm_replicate.1 p ▸ s, Sublist.subperm⟩
#align multiset.replicate_le_coe Multiset.replicate_le_coe
theorem nsmul_replicate {a : α} (n m : ℕ) : n • replicate m a = replicate (n * m) a :=
((replicateAddMonoidHom a).map_nsmul _ _).symm
#align multiset.nsmul_replicate Multiset.nsmul_replicate
theorem nsmul_singleton (a : α) (n) : n • ({a} : Multiset α) = replicate n a := by
rw [← replicate_one, nsmul_replicate, mul_one]
#align multiset.nsmul_singleton Multiset.nsmul_singleton
theorem replicate_le_replicate (a : α) {k n : ℕ} : replicate k a ≤ replicate n a ↔ k ≤ n :=
_root_.trans (by rw [← replicate_le_coe, coe_replicate]) (List.replicate_sublist_replicate a)
#align multiset.replicate_le_replicate Multiset.replicate_le_replicate
theorem le_replicate_iff {m : Multiset α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
m ≤ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, m = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨card m, (card_mono h).trans_eq (card_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_card.2 fun _ hb => eq_of_mem_replicate <| subset_of_le h hb⟩,
fun ⟨_, hkn, hm⟩ => hm.symm ▸ (replicate_le_replicate _).2 hkn⟩
#align multiset.le_replicate_iff Multiset.le_replicate_iff
theorem lt_replicate_succ {m : Multiset α} {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
m < replicate (n + 1) x ↔ m ≤ replicate n x := by
rw [lt_iff_cons_le]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x', hx'⟩
have := eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_of_le hx' (mem_cons_self _ _))
rwa [this, replicate_succ, cons_le_cons_iff] at hx'
· intro h
rw [replicate_succ]
exact ⟨x, cons_le_cons _ h⟩
#align multiset.lt_replicate_succ Multiset.lt_replicate_succ
/-! ### Erasing one copy of an element -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the multiset that subtracts 1 from the multiplicity of `a`. -/
def erase (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (l.erase a : Multiset α)) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => Quot.sound (p.erase a)
#align multiset.erase Multiset.erase
@[simp]
theorem coe_erase (l : List α) (a : α) : erase (l : Multiset α) a = l.erase a :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_erase Multiset.coe_erase
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): `dsimp` can not prove this, yet linter complains
theorem erase_zero (a : α) : (0 : Multiset α).erase a = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.erase_zero Multiset.erase_zero
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_cons_head a l
#align multiset.erase_cons_head Multiset.erase_cons_head
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b ::ₘ s).erase a = b ::ₘ s.erase a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_cons_tail l (not_beq_of_ne h)
#align multiset.erase_cons_tail Multiset.erase_cons_tail
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).erase a = 0 :=
erase_cons_head a 0
#align multiset.erase_singleton Multiset.erase_singleton
@[simp]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∉ s → s.erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_of_not_mem h
#align multiset.erase_of_not_mem Multiset.erase_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem cons_erase {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → a ::ₘ s.erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => Quot.sound (perm_cons_erase h).symm
#align multiset.cons_erase Multiset.cons_erase
theorem erase_cons_tail_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(b ::ₘ s).erase a = b ::ₘ s.erase a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | hab
· simp [cons_erase h]
· exact s.erase_cons_tail hab.symm
theorem le_cons_erase (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a ::ₘ s.erase a :=
if h : a ∈ s then le_of_eq (cons_erase h).symm
else by rw [erase_of_not_mem h]; apply le_cons_self
#align multiset.le_cons_erase Multiset.le_cons_erase
theorem add_singleton_eq_iff {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} : s + {a} = t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s = t.erase a := by
rw [add_comm, singleton_add]; constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.mem_cons_self a, (s.erase_cons_head a).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨h, rfl⟩
exact cons_erase h
#align multiset.add_singleton_eq_iff Multiset.add_singleton_eq_iff
theorem erase_add_left_pos {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (t) : a ∈ s → (s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ l₂ h => congr_arg _ <| erase_append_left l₂ h
#align multiset.erase_add_left_pos Multiset.erase_add_left_pos
theorem erase_add_right_pos {a : α} (s) {t : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a := by rw [add_comm, erase_add_left_pos s h, add_comm]
#align multiset.erase_add_right_pos Multiset.erase_add_right_pos
theorem erase_add_right_neg {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (t) :
a ∉ s → (s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ l₂ h => congr_arg _ <| erase_append_right l₂ h
#align multiset.erase_add_right_neg Multiset.erase_add_right_neg
theorem erase_add_left_neg {a : α} (s) {t : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t := by rw [add_comm, erase_add_right_neg s h, add_comm]
#align multiset.erase_add_left_neg Multiset.erase_add_left_neg
theorem erase_le (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s.erase a ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => (erase_sublist a l).subperm
#align multiset.erase_le Multiset.erase_le
@[simp]
theorem erase_lt {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : s.erase a < s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => not_imp_comm.1 erase_of_not_mem (ne_of_lt h), fun h => by
simpa [h] using lt_cons_self (s.erase a) a⟩
#align multiset.erase_lt Multiset.erase_lt
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s.erase a ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le (erase_le a s)
#align multiset.erase_subset Multiset.erase_subset
theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ s.erase b ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_erase_of_ne ab
#align multiset.mem_erase_of_ne Multiset.mem_erase_of_ne
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.erase b → a ∈ s :=
mem_of_subset (erase_subset _ _)
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_erase Multiset.mem_of_mem_erase
theorem erase_comm (s : Multiset α) (a b : α) : (s.erase a).erase b = (s.erase b).erase a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| l.erase_comm a b
#align multiset.erase_comm Multiset.erase_comm
theorem erase_le_erase {s t : Multiset α} (a : α) (h : s ≤ t) : s.erase a ≤ t.erase a :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.erase _).subperm
#align multiset.erase_le_erase Multiset.erase_le_erase
theorem erase_le_iff_le_cons {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} : s.erase a ≤ t ↔ s ≤ a ::ₘ t :=
⟨fun h => le_trans (le_cons_erase _ _) (cons_le_cons _ h), fun h =>
if m : a ∈ s then by rw [← cons_erase m] at h; exact (cons_le_cons_iff _).1 h
else le_trans (erase_le _ _) ((le_cons_of_not_mem m).1 h)⟩
#align multiset.erase_le_iff_le_cons Multiset.erase_le_iff_le_cons
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) = pred (card s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_erase_of_mem
#align multiset.card_erase_of_mem Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) + 1 = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_erase_add_one
#align multiset.card_erase_add_one Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) < card s :=
fun h => card_lt_card (erase_lt.mpr h)
#align multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : card (s.erase a) ≤ card s :=
card_le_card (erase_le a s)
#align multiset.card_erase_le Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem card_erase_eq_ite {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
card (s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then pred (card s) else card s := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rwa [card_erase_of_mem h, if_pos]
· rwa [erase_of_not_mem h, if_neg]
#align multiset.card_erase_eq_ite Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end Erase
@[simp]
theorem coe_reverse (l : List α) : (reverse l : Multiset α) = l :=
Quot.sound <| reverse_perm _
#align multiset.coe_reverse Multiset.coe_reverse
/-! ### `Multiset.map` -/
/-- `map f s` is the lift of the list `map` operation. The multiplicity
of `b` in `map f s` is the number of `a ∈ s` (counting multiplicity)
such that `f a = b`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l : List α => (l.map f : Multiset β)) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => Quot.sound (p.map f)
#align multiset.map Multiset.map
@[congr]
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} :
s = t → (∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) → map f s = map g t := by
rintro rfl h
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact congr_arg _ (List.map_congr h)
#align multiset.map_congr Multiset.map_congr
theorem map_hcongr {β' : Type v} {m : Multiset α} {f : α → β} {f' : α → β'} (h : β = β')
(hf : ∀ a ∈ m, HEq (f a) (f' a)) : HEq (map f m) (map f' m) := by
subst h; simp at hf
simp [map_congr rfl hf]
#align multiset.map_hcongr Multiset.map_hcongr
theorem forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ y ∈ s.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x) :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _L => List.forall_mem_map_iff
#align multiset.forall_mem_map_iff Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma map_coe (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = l.map f := rfl
#align multiset.coe_map Multiset.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : map f 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.map_zero Multiset.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (a ::ₘ s) = f a ::ₘ map f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.map_cons Multiset.map_cons
theorem map_comp_cons (f : α → β) (t) : map f ∘ cons t = cons (f t) ∘ map f := by
ext
simp
#align multiset.map_comp_cons Multiset.map_comp_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).map f = {f a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.map_singleton Multiset.map_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (k : ℕ) (a : α) : (replicate k a).map f = replicate k (f a) := by
simp only [← coe_replicate, map_coe, List.map_replicate]
#align multiset.map_replicate Multiset.map_replicate
@[simp]
theorem map_add (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (s + t) = map f s + map f t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg _ <| map_append _ _ _
#align multiset.map_add Multiset.map_add
/-- If each element of `s : Multiset α` can be lifted to `β`, then `s` can be lifted to
`Multiset β`. -/
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Multiset α) (Multiset β) (map c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨l⟩ hl
lift l to List β using hl
exact ⟨l, map_coe _ _⟩
#align multiset.can_lift Multiset.canLift
/-- `Multiset.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def mapAddMonoidHom (f : α → β) : Multiset α →+ Multiset β where
toFun := map f
map_zero' := map_zero _
map_add' := map_add _
#align multiset.map_add_monoid_hom Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapAddMonoidHom (f : α → β) :
(mapAddMonoidHom f : Multiset α → Multiset β) = map f :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_map_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_mapAddMonoidHom
theorem map_nsmul (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) (s) : map f (n • s) = n • map f s :=
(mapAddMonoidHom f).map_nsmul _ _
#align multiset.map_nsmul Multiset.map_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Multiset α} : b ∈ map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_map
#align multiset.mem_map Multiset.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α → β) (s) : card (map f s) = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_map _ _
#align multiset.card_map Multiset.card_map
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} {f : α → β} : s.map f = 0 ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← Multiset.card_eq_zero, Multiset.card_map, Multiset.card_eq_zero]
#align multiset.map_eq_zero Multiset.map_eq_zero
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
mem_map.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
#align multiset.mem_map_of_mem Multiset.mem_map_of_mem
theorem map_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {s : Multiset α} {b : β} :
map f s = {b} ↔ ∃ a : α, s = {a} ∧ f a = b := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, s = {a} := by rw [← card_eq_one, ← card_map, h, card_singleton]
refine ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_singleton, ← h, ha, map_singleton, mem_singleton]
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, rfl⟩
simp
#align multiset.map_eq_singleton Multiset.map_eq_singleton
theorem map_eq_cons [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (t : Multiset β) (b : β) :
(∃ a ∈ s, f a = b ∧ (s.erase a).map f = t) ↔ s.map f = b ::ₘ t := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [← map_cons, Multiset.cons_erase ha]
· intro h
have : b ∈ s.map f := by
rw [h]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
obtain ⟨a, h1, rfl⟩ := mem_map.mp this
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h1
rw [map_cons, cons_inj_right] at h
refine ⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, rfl, ?_⟩
rw [Multiset.erase_cons_head, h]
#align multiset.map_eq_cons Multiset.map_eq_cons
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Multiset.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
f a ∈ map f s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_map_of_injective H
#align multiset.mem_map_of_injective Multiset.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => congr_arg _ <| List.map_map _ _ _
#align multiset.map_map Multiset.map_map
theorem map_id (s : Multiset α) : map id s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => congr_arg _ <| List.map_id _
#align multiset.map_id Multiset.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' (s : Multiset α) : map (fun x => x) s = s :=
map_id s
#align multiset.map_id' Multiset.map_id'
-- Porting note: was a `simp` lemma in mathlib3
theorem map_const (s : Multiset α) (b : β) : map (const α b) s = replicate (card s) b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => congr_arg _ <| List.map_const' _ _
#align multiset.map_const Multiset.map_const
-- Porting note: was not a `simp` lemma in mathlib3 because `Function.const` was reducible
@[simp] theorem map_const' (s : Multiset α) (b : β) : map (fun _ ↦ b) s = replicate (card s) b :=
map_const _ _
#align multiset.map_const' Multiset.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (Function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
eq_of_mem_replicate <| by rwa [map_const] at h
#align multiset.eq_of_mem_map_const Multiset.eq_of_mem_map_const
@[simp]
theorem map_le_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : map f s ≤ map f t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.map f).subperm
#align multiset.map_le_map Multiset.map_le_map
@[simp]
theorem map_lt_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s < t) : s.map f < t.map f := by
refine (map_le_map h.le).lt_of_not_le fun H => h.ne <| eq_of_le_of_card_le h.le ?_
rw [← s.card_map f, ← t.card_map f]
exact card_le_card H
#align multiset.map_lt_map Multiset.map_lt_map
theorem map_mono (f : α → β) : Monotone (map f) := fun _ _ => map_le_map
#align multiset.map_mono Multiset.map_mono
theorem map_strictMono (f : α → β) : StrictMono (map f) := fun _ _ => map_lt_map
#align multiset.map_strict_mono Multiset.map_strictMono
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (H : s ⊆ t) : map f s ⊆ map f t := fun _b m =>
let ⟨a, h, e⟩ := mem_map.1 m
mem_map.2 ⟨a, H h, e⟩
#align multiset.map_subset_map Multiset.map_subset_map
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α)
(s : Multiset α) : (s.erase x).map f = (s.map f).erase (f x) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with y s ih
· simp
by_cases hxy : y = x
· cases hxy
simp
· rw [s.erase_cons_tail hxy, map_cons, map_cons, (s.map f).erase_cons_tail (hf.ne hxy), ih]
#align multiset.map_erase Multiset.map_erase
theorem map_erase_of_mem [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β)
(s : Multiset α) {x : α} (h : x ∈ s) : (s.erase x).map f = (s.map f).erase (f x) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with y s ih
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y x with rfl | hxy
· simp
replace h : x ∈ s := by simpa [hxy.symm] using h
rw [s.erase_cons_tail hxy, map_cons, map_cons, ih h, erase_cons_tail_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem f h)]
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (map f) := by
intro s
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with x s ih
· exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := ih
exact ⟨y ::ₘ t, map_cons _ _ _⟩
#align multiset.map_surjective_of_surjective Multiset.map_surjective_of_surjective
/-! ### `Multiset.fold` -/
/-- `foldl f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldl f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is right-commutative,
that is, `f (f b a₁) a₂ = f (f b a₂) a₁`. -/
def foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) : β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => List.foldl f b l) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => p.foldl_eq H b
#align multiset.foldl Multiset.foldl
@[simp]
theorem foldl_zero (f : β → α → β) (H b) : foldl f H b 0 = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldl_zero Multiset.foldl_zero
@[simp]
theorem foldl_cons (f : β → α → β) (H b a s) : foldl f H b (a ::ₘ s) = foldl f H (f b a) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.foldl_cons Multiset.foldl_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldl_add (f : β → α → β) (H b s t) : foldl f H b (s + t) = foldl f H (foldl f H b s) t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => foldl_append _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldl_add Multiset.foldl_add
/-- `foldr f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldr f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is left-commutative,
that is, `f a₁ (f a₂ b) = f a₂ (f a₁ b)`. -/
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) : β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => List.foldr f b l) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => p.foldr_eq H b
#align multiset.foldr Multiset.foldr
@[simp]
theorem foldr_zero (f : α → β → β) (H b) : foldr f H b 0 = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldr_zero Multiset.foldr_zero
@[simp]
theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (H b a s) : foldr f H b (a ::ₘ s) = f a (foldr f H b s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.foldr_cons Multiset.foldr_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldr_singleton (f : α → β → β) (H b a) : foldr f H b ({a} : Multiset α) = f a b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldr_singleton Multiset.foldr_singleton
@[simp]
theorem foldr_add (f : α → β → β) (H b s t) : foldr f H b (s + t) = foldr f H (foldr f H b t) s :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => foldr_append _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldr_add Multiset.foldr_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldr f b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_foldr Multiset.coe_foldr
@[simp]
theorem coe_foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldl f H b l = l.foldl f b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_foldl Multiset.coe_foldl
theorem coe_foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldl (fun x y => f y x) b :=
(congr_arg (foldr f H b) (coe_reverse l)).symm.trans <| foldr_reverse _ _ _
#align multiset.coe_foldr_swap Multiset.coe_foldr_swap
theorem foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) :
foldr f H b s = foldl (fun x y => f y x) (fun _x _y _z => (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => coe_foldr_swap _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldr_swap Multiset.foldr_swap
theorem foldl_swap (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) :
foldl f H b s = foldr (fun x y => f y x) (fun _x _y _z => (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).symm
#align multiset.foldl_swap Multiset.foldl_swap
theorem foldr_induction' (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (x : β) (q : α → Prop)
(p : β → Prop) (s : Multiset α) (hpqf : ∀ a b, q a → p b → p (f a b)) (px : p x)
(q_s : ∀ a ∈ s, q a) : p (foldr f H x s) := by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simpa
| cons a s ihs =>
simp only [forall_mem_cons, foldr_cons] at q_s ⊢
exact hpqf _ _ q_s.1 (ihs q_s.2)
#align multiset.foldr_induction' Multiset.foldr_induction'
theorem foldr_induction (f : α → α → α) (H : LeftCommutative f) (x : α) (p : α → Prop)
(s : Multiset α) (p_f : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (f a b)) (px : p x) (p_s : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) :
p (foldr f H x s) :=
foldr_induction' f H x p p s p_f px p_s
#align multiset.foldr_induction Multiset.foldr_induction
theorem foldl_induction' (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (x : β) (q : α → Prop)
(p : β → Prop) (s : Multiset α) (hpqf : ∀ a b, q a → p b → p (f b a)) (px : p x)
(q_s : ∀ a ∈ s, q a) : p (foldl f H x s) := by
rw [foldl_swap]
exact foldr_induction' (fun x y => f y x) (fun x y z => (H _ _ _).symm) x q p s hpqf px q_s
#align multiset.foldl_induction' Multiset.foldl_induction'
theorem foldl_induction (f : α → α → α) (H : RightCommutative f) (x : α) (p : α → Prop)
(s : Multiset α) (p_f : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (f b a)) (px : p x) (p_s : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) :
p (foldl f H x s) :=
foldl_induction' f H x p p s p_f px p_s
#align multiset.foldl_induction Multiset.foldl_induction
/-! ### Map for partial functions -/
/-- Lift of the list `pmap` operation. Map a partial function `f` over a multiset
`s` whose elements are all in the domain of `f`. -/
nonrec def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s : Multiset α) : (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → Multiset β :=
Quot.recOn' s (fun l H => ↑(pmap f l H)) fun l₁ l₂ (pp : l₁ ~ l₂) =>
funext fun H₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a =>
have H₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a := fun a h => H₂ a (pp.subset h)
have : ∀ {s₂ e H}, @Eq.ndrec (Multiset α) l₁ (fun s => (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → Multiset β)
(fun _ => ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁)) s₂ e H = ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁) := by
intro s₂ e _; subst e; rfl
this.trans <| Quot.sound <| pp.pmap f
#align multiset.pmap Multiset.pmap
@[simp]
theorem coe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) :
pmap f l H = l.pmap f H :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_pmap Multiset.coe_pmap
@[simp]
theorem pmap_zero {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (h : ∀ a ∈ (0 : Multiset α), p a) :
pmap f 0 h = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.pmap_zero Multiset.pmap_zero
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
∀ h : ∀ b ∈ a ::ₘ m, p b,
pmap f (a ::ₘ m) h =
f a (h a (mem_cons_self a m)) ::ₘ pmap f m fun a ha => h a <| mem_cons_of_mem ha :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _l _h => rfl
#align multiset.pmap_cons Multiset.pmap_cons
/-- "Attach" a proof that `a ∈ s` to each element `a` in `s` to produce
a multiset on `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : Multiset α) : Multiset { x // x ∈ s } :=
pmap Subtype.mk s fun _a => id
#align multiset.attach Multiset.attach
@[simp]
theorem coe_attach (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset { x // x ∈ l }) (@attach α l) l.attach :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_attach Multiset.coe_attach
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l a b
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
#align multiset.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) :
∀ H, @pmap _ _ p (fun a _ => f a) s H = map f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_eq_map p f l H
#align multiset.pmap_eq_map Multiset.pmap_eq_map
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {g : ∀ a, q a → β} (s : Multiset α) :
∀ {H₁ H₂}, (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (h₁ h₂), f a h₁ = g a h₂) → pmap f s H₁ = pmap g s H₂ :=
@(Quot.inductionOn s (fun l _H₁ _H₂ h => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_congr l h))
#align multiset.pmap_congr Multiset.pmap_congr
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s) :
∀ H, map g (pmap f s H) = pmap (fun a h => g (f a h)) s H :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.map_pmap g f l H
#align multiset.map_pmap Multiset.map_pmap
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s) :
∀ H, pmap f s H = s.attach.map fun x => f x.1 (H _ x.2) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_eq_map_attach f l H
#align multiset.pmap_eq_map_attach Multiset.pmap_eq_map_attach
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: Left hand does not simplify
theorem attach_map_val' (s : Multiset α) (f : α → β) : (s.attach.map fun i => f i.val) = s.map f :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.attach_map_coe' l f
#align multiset.attach_map_coe' Multiset.attach_map_val'
#align multiset.attach_map_val' Multiset.attach_map_val'
@[simp]
theorem attach_map_val (s : Multiset α) : s.attach.map Subtype.val = s :=
(attach_map_val' _ _).trans s.map_id
#align multiset.attach_map_coe Multiset.attach_map_val
#align multiset.attach_map_val Multiset.attach_map_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_attach (s : Multiset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_attach _
#align multiset.mem_attach Multiset.mem_attach
@[simp]
theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {s H b} :
b ∈ pmap f s H ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ s), f a (H a h) = b :=
Quot.inductionOn s (fun _l _H => List.mem_pmap) H
#align multiset.mem_pmap Multiset.mem_pmap
@[simp]
theorem card_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s H) : card (pmap f s H) = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s (fun _l _H => length_pmap) H
#align multiset.card_pmap Multiset.card_pmap
@[simp]
theorem card_attach {m : Multiset α} : card (attach m) = card m :=
card_pmap _ _ _
#align multiset.card_attach Multiset.card_attach
@[simp]
theorem attach_zero : (0 : Multiset α).attach = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.attach_zero Multiset.attach_zero
theorem attach_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).attach =
⟨a, mem_cons_self a m⟩ ::ₘ m.attach.map fun p => ⟨p.1, mem_cons_of_mem p.2⟩ :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun l =>
congr_arg _ <|
congr_arg (List.cons _) <| by
rw [List.map_pmap]; exact List.pmap_congr _ fun _ _ _ _ => Subtype.eq rfl
#align multiset.attach_cons Multiset.attach_cons
section DecidablePiExists
variable {m : Multiset α}
/-- If `p` is a decidable predicate,
so is the predicate that all elements of a multiset satisfy `p`. -/
protected def decidableForallMultiset {p : α → Prop} [hp : ∀ a, Decidable (p a)] :
Decidable (∀ a ∈ m, p a) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton m fun l => decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ l, p a) <| by simp
#align multiset.decidable_forall_multiset Multiset.decidableForallMultiset
instance decidableDforallMultiset {p : ∀ a ∈ m, Prop} [_hp : ∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), Decidable (p a h)] :
Decidable (∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
@decidable_of_iff _ _
(Iff.intro (fun h a ha => h ⟨a, ha⟩ (mem_attach _ _)) fun h ⟨_a, _ha⟩ _ => h _ _)
(@Multiset.decidableForallMultiset _ m.attach (fun a => p a.1 a.2) _)
#align multiset.decidable_dforall_multiset Multiset.decidableDforallMultiset
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by multisets -/
instance decidableEqPiMultiset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] :
DecidableEq (∀ a ∈ m, β a) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), f a h = g a h) (by simp [Function.funext_iff])
#align multiset.decidable_eq_pi_multiset Multiset.decidableEqPiMultiset
/-- If `p` is a decidable predicate,
so is the existence of an element in a multiset satisfying `p`. -/
protected def decidableExistsMultiset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∃ x ∈ m, p x) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton m fun l => decidable_of_iff (∃ a ∈ l, p a) <| by simp
#align multiset.decidable_exists_multiset Multiset.decidableExistsMultiset
instance decidableDexistsMultiset {p : ∀ a ∈ m, Prop} [_hp : ∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), Decidable (p a h)] :
Decidable (∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
@decidable_of_iff _ _
(Iff.intro (fun ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, _, ha₂⟩ => ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩) fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, mem_attach _ _, ha₂⟩)
(@Multiset.decidableExistsMultiset { a // a ∈ m } m.attach (fun a => p a.1 a.2) _)
#align multiset.decidable_dexists_multiset Multiset.decidableDexistsMultiset
end DecidablePiExists
/-! ### Subtraction -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u : Multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s - t` is the multiset such that `count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t` for all `a`
(note that it is truncated subtraction, so it is `0` if `count a t ≥ count a s`). -/
protected def sub (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => (l₁.diff l₂ : Multiset α)) fun _v₁ _v₂ _w₁ _w₂ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.diff p₂
#align multiset.sub Multiset.sub
instance : Sub (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sub⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (s t : List α) : (s - t : Multiset α) = (s.diff t : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_sub Multiset.coe_sub
/-- This is a special case of `tsub_zero`, which should be used instead of this.
This is needed to prove `OrderedSub (Multiset α)`. -/
protected theorem sub_zero (s : Multiset α) : s - 0 = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.sub_zero Multiset.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem sub_cons (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : s - a ::ₘ t = s.erase a - t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg _ <| diff_cons _ _ _
#align multiset.sub_cons Multiset.sub_cons
/-- This is a special case of `tsub_le_iff_right`, which should be used instead of this.
This is needed to prove `OrderedSub (Multiset α)`. -/
protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add : s - t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u + t := by
revert s
exact @(Multiset.induction_on t (by simp [Multiset.sub_zero]) fun a t IH s => by
simp [IH, erase_le_iff_le_cons])
#align multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add
instance : OrderedSub (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _n _m _k => Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add⟩
theorem cons_sub_of_le (a : α) {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : a ::ₘ s - t = a ::ₘ (s - t) := by
rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h]
#align multiset.cons_sub_of_le Multiset.cons_sub_of_le
theorem sub_eq_fold_erase (s t : Multiset α) : s - t = foldl erase erase_comm s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => by
show ofList (l₁.diff l₂) = foldl erase erase_comm l₁ l₂
rw [diff_eq_foldl l₁ l₂]
symm
exact foldl_hom _ _ _ _ _ fun x y => rfl
#align multiset.sub_eq_fold_erase Multiset.sub_eq_fold_erase
@[simp]
theorem card_sub {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : card (s - t) = card s - card t :=
Nat.eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← card_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
#align multiset.card_sub Multiset.card_sub
/-! ### Union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the lattice join operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∪ t` is the maximum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def union (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
s - t + t
#align multiset.union Multiset.union
instance : Union (Multiset α) :=
⟨union⟩
theorem union_def (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t = s - t + t :=
rfl
#align multiset.union_def Multiset.union_def
theorem le_union_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ s ∪ t :=
le_tsub_add
#align multiset.le_union_left Multiset.le_union_left
theorem le_union_right (s t : Multiset α) : t ≤ s ∪ t :=
le_add_left _ _
#align multiset.le_union_right Multiset.le_union_right
theorem eq_union_left : t ≤ s → s ∪ t = s :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le
#align multiset.eq_union_left Multiset.eq_union_left
theorem union_le_union_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s ∪ u ≤ t ∪ u :=
add_le_add_right (tsub_le_tsub_right h _) u
#align multiset.union_le_union_right Multiset.union_le_union_right
theorem union_le (h₁ : s ≤ u) (h₂ : t ≤ u) : s ∪ t ≤ u := by
rw [← eq_union_left h₂]; exact union_le_union_right h₁ t
#align multiset.union_le Multiset.union_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => (mem_add.1 h).imp_left (mem_of_le tsub_le_self),
(Or.elim · (mem_of_le <| le_union_left _ _) (mem_of_le <| le_union_right _ _))⟩
#align multiset.mem_union Multiset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem map_union [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Function.Injective f) {s t : Multiset α} :
map f (s ∪ t) = map f s ∪ map f t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ =>
congr_arg ofList (by rw [List.map_append f, List.map_diff finj])
#align multiset.map_union Multiset.map_union
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp] theorem zero_union : 0 ∪ s = s := by
simp [union_def]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp] theorem union_zero : s ∪ 0 = s := by
simp [union_def]
/-! ### Intersection -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the lattice meet operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∩ t` is the minimum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def inter (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ s t (fun l₁ l₂ => (l₁.bagInter l₂ : Multiset α)) fun _v₁ _v₂ _w₁ _w₂ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.bagInter p₂
#align multiset.inter Multiset.inter
instance : Inter (Multiset α) :=
⟨inter⟩
@[simp]
theorem inter_zero (s : Multiset α) : s ∩ 0 = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList l.bagInter_nil
#align multiset.inter_zero Multiset.inter_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_inter (s : Multiset α) : 0 ∩ s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList l.nil_bagInter
#align multiset.zero_inter Multiset.zero_inter
@[simp]
theorem cons_inter_of_pos {a} (s : Multiset α) {t} : a ∈ t → (a ::ₘ s) ∩ t = a ::ₘ s ∩ t.erase a :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h => congr_arg ofList <| cons_bagInter_of_pos _ h
#align multiset.cons_inter_of_pos Multiset.cons_inter_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem cons_inter_of_neg {a} (s : Multiset α) {t} : a ∉ t → (a ::ₘ s) ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h => congr_arg ofList <| cons_bagInter_of_neg _ h
#align multiset.cons_inter_of_neg Multiset.cons_inter_of_neg
theorem inter_le_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ∩ t ≤ s :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => (bagInter_sublist_left _ _).subperm
#align multiset.inter_le_left Multiset.inter_le_left
theorem inter_le_right (s : Multiset α) : ∀ t, s ∩ t ≤ t :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun t => (zero_inter t).symm ▸ zero_le _) fun a s IH t =>
if h : a ∈ t then by simpa [h] using cons_le_cons a (IH (t.erase a)) else by simp [h, IH]
#align multiset.inter_le_right Multiset.inter_le_right
theorem le_inter (h₁ : s ≤ t) (h₂ : s ≤ u) : s ≤ t ∩ u := by
revert s u; refine @(Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t IH => ?_) <;> intros s u h₁ h₂
· simpa only [zero_inter, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using h₁
by_cases h : a ∈ u
· rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, ← erase_le_iff_le_cons]
exact IH (erase_le_iff_le_cons.2 h₁) (erase_le_erase _ h₂)
· rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h]
exact IH ((le_cons_of_not_mem <| mt (mem_of_le h₂) h).1 h₁) h₂
#align multiset.le_inter Multiset.le_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter : a ∈ s ∩ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h, mem_of_le (inter_le_right _ _) h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [← cons_erase h₁, cons_inter_of_pos _ h₂]; apply mem_cons_self⟩
#align multiset.mem_inter Multiset.mem_inter
instance : Lattice (Multiset α) :=
{ sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := @union_le _ _
le_sup_left := le_union_left
le_sup_right := le_union_right
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := @le_inter _ _
inf_le_left := inter_le_left
inf_le_right := inter_le_right }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union (s t : Multiset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t :=
rfl
#align multiset.sup_eq_union Multiset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align multiset.inf_eq_inter Multiset.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_inter_iff : s ≤ t ∩ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u :=
le_inf_iff
#align multiset.le_inter_iff Multiset.le_inter_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_le_iff : s ∪ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u :=
sup_le_iff
#align multiset.union_le_iff Multiset.union_le_iff
theorem union_comm (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t = t ∪ s := sup_comm _ _
#align multiset.union_comm Multiset.union_comm
theorem inter_comm (s t : Multiset α) : s ∩ t = t ∩ s := inf_comm _ _
#align multiset.inter_comm Multiset.inter_comm
theorem eq_union_right (h : s ≤ t) : s ∪ t = t := by rw [union_comm, eq_union_left h]
#align multiset.eq_union_right Multiset.eq_union_right
theorem union_le_union_left (h : s ≤ t) (u) : u ∪ s ≤ u ∪ t :=
sup_le_sup_left h _
#align multiset.union_le_union_left Multiset.union_le_union_left
theorem union_le_add (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t ≤ s + t :=
union_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
#align multiset.union_le_add Multiset.union_le_add
theorem union_add_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s ∪ t + u = s + u ∪ (t + u) := by
simpa [(· ∪ ·), union, eq_comm, add_assoc] using
show s + u - (t + u) = s - t by rw [add_comm t, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align multiset.union_add_distrib Multiset.union_add_distrib
theorem add_union_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s + (t ∪ u) = s + t ∪ (s + u) := by
rw [add_comm, union_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
#align multiset.add_union_distrib Multiset.add_union_distrib
theorem cons_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ (s ∪ t) = a ::ₘ s ∪ a ::ₘ t := by
simpa using add_union_distrib (a ::ₘ 0) s t
#align multiset.cons_union_distrib Multiset.cons_union_distrib
theorem inter_add_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s ∩ t + u = (s + u) ∩ (t + u) := by
by_contra h
cases'
lt_iff_cons_le.1
(lt_of_le_of_ne
(le_inter (add_le_add_right (inter_le_left s t) u)
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_right s t) u))
h) with
a hl
rw [← cons_add] at hl
exact
not_le_of_lt (lt_cons_self (s ∩ t) a)
(le_inter (le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_left _ _)))
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_right _ _))))
#align multiset.inter_add_distrib Multiset.inter_add_distrib
theorem add_inter_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s + t ∩ u = (s + t) ∩ (s + u) := by
rw [add_comm, inter_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
#align multiset.add_inter_distrib Multiset.add_inter_distrib
theorem cons_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s ∩ t = (a ::ₘ s) ∩ (a ::ₘ t) := by
simp
#align multiset.cons_inter_distrib Multiset.cons_inter_distrib
theorem union_add_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t + s ∩ t = s + t := by
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [union_add_distrib]
refine union_le (add_le_add_left (inter_le_right _ _) _) ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_le_add_right (inter_le_left _ _) _
· rw [add_comm, add_inter_distrib]
refine le_inter (add_le_add_right (le_union_right _ _) _) ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_le_add_right (le_union_left _ _) _
#align multiset.union_add_inter Multiset.union_add_inter
theorem sub_add_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s - t + s ∩ t = s := by
rw [inter_comm]
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a t IH s => ?_
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, sub_cons, add_cons, IH, cons_erase h]
· rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h, sub_cons, erase_of_not_mem h, IH]
#align multiset.sub_add_inter Multiset.sub_add_inter
theorem sub_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s - s ∩ t = s - t :=
add_right_cancel <| by rw [sub_add_inter s t, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (inter_le_left s t)]
#align multiset.sub_inter Multiset.sub_inter
end
/-! ### `Multiset.filter` -/
section
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
/-- `Filter p s` returns the elements in `s` (with the same multiplicities)
which satisfy `p`, and removes the rest. -/
def filter (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (List.filter p l : Multiset α)) fun _l₁ _l₂ h => Quot.sound <| h.filter p
#align multiset.filter Multiset.filter
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma filter_coe (l : List α) : filter p l = l.filter p := rfl
#align multiset.coe_filter Multiset.filter_coe
@[simp]
theorem filter_zero : filter p 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.filter_zero Multiset.filter_zero
theorem filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) → filter p s = filter q s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => congr_arg ofList <| filter_congr' <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_congr Multiset.filter_congr
@[simp]
theorem filter_add (s t : Multiset α) : filter p (s + t) = filter p s + filter p t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg ofList <| filter_append _ _
#align multiset.filter_add Multiset.filter_add
@[simp]
theorem filter_le (s : Multiset α) : filter p s ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => (filter_sublist _).subperm
#align multiset.filter_le Multiset.filter_le
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset (s : Multiset α) : filter p s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le <| filter_le _ _
#align multiset.filter_subset Multiset.filter_subset
theorem filter_le_filter {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : filter p s ≤ filter p t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.filter (p ·)).subperm
#align multiset.filter_le_filter Multiset.filter_le_filter
theorem monotone_filter_left : Monotone (filter p) := fun _s _t => filter_le_filter p
#align multiset.monotone_filter_left Multiset.monotone_filter_left
theorem monotone_filter_right (s : Multiset α) ⦃p q : α → Prop⦄ [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(h : ∀ b, p b → q b) :
s.filter p ≤ s.filter q :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => (l.monotone_filter_right <| by simpa using h).subperm
#align multiset.monotone_filter_right Multiset.monotone_filter_right
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → filter p (a ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ filter p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l h => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_cons_of_pos l <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_cons_of_pos Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬p a → filter p (a ::ₘ s) = filter p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l h => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_cons_of_neg l <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_cons_of_neg Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem mem_filter {a : α} {s} : a ∈ filter p s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simpa using List.mem_filter (p := (p ·))
#align multiset.mem_filter Multiset.mem_filter
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : p a :=
(mem_filter.1 h).2
#align multiset.of_mem_filter Multiset.of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : a ∈ s :=
(mem_filter.1 h).1
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_filter Multiset.mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (m : a ∈ l) (h : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨m, h⟩
#align multiset.mem_filter_of_mem Multiset.mem_filter_of_mem
theorem filter_eq_self {s} : filter p s = s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l =>
Iff.trans ⟨fun h => (filter_sublist _).eq_of_length (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg ofList⟩ <| by simp
#align multiset.filter_eq_self Multiset.filter_eq_self
theorem filter_eq_nil {s} : filter p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l =>
Iff.trans ⟨fun h => eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h), congr_arg ofList⟩ <|
by simpa using List.filter_eq_nil (p := (p ·))
#align multiset.filter_eq_nil Multiset.filter_eq_nil
theorem le_filter {s t} : s ≤ filter p t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_trans h (filter_le _ _), fun _a m => of_mem_filter (mem_of_le h m)⟩, fun ⟨h, al⟩ =>
filter_eq_self.2 al ▸ filter_le_filter p h⟩
#align multiset.le_filter Multiset.le_filter
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (a ::ₘ s) = (if p a then {a} else 0) + filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, singleton_add]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h, zero_add]
#align multiset.filter_cons Multiset.filter_cons
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
simp only [singleton, filter_cons, filter_zero, add_zero, empty_eq_zero]
#align multiset.filter_singleton Multiset.filter_singleton
theorem filter_nsmul (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) : filter p (n • s) = n • filter p s := by
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp only [filter_zero, nsmul_zero]
· intro a ha ih
rw [nsmul_cons, filter_add, ih, filter_cons, nsmul_add]
congr
split_ifs with hp <;>
· simp only [filter_eq_self, nsmul_zero, filter_eq_nil]
intro b hb
rwa [mem_singleton.mp (mem_of_mem_nsmul hb)]
#align multiset.filter_nsmul Multiset.filter_nsmul
variable (p)
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s - t) = filter p s - filter p t := by
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a t IH s => ?_
rw [sub_cons, IH]
by_cases h : p a
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, sub_cons]
congr
by_cases m : a ∈ s
· rw [← cons_inj_right a, ← filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_erase (mem_filter_of_mem m h),
cons_erase m]
· rw [erase_of_not_mem m, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_filter m)]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h]
by_cases m : a ∈ s
· rw [(by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h] : filter p (erase s a) = filter p (a ::ₘ erase s a)),
cons_erase m]
· rw [erase_of_not_mem m]
#align multiset.filter_sub Multiset.filter_sub
@[simp]
theorem filter_union [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s ∪ t) = filter p s ∪ filter p t := by simp [(· ∪ ·), union]
#align multiset.filter_union Multiset.filter_union
@[simp]
theorem filter_inter [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s ∩ t) = filter p s ∩ filter p t :=
le_antisymm
(le_inter (filter_le_filter _ <| inter_le_left _ _)
(filter_le_filter _ <| inter_le_right _ _)) <|
le_filter.2
⟨inf_le_inf (filter_le _ _) (filter_le _ _), fun _a h =>
of_mem_filter (mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h)⟩
#align multiset.filter_inter Multiset.filter_inter
@[simp]
theorem filter_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp
#align multiset.filter_filter Multiset.filter_filter
lemma filter_comm (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter q (filter p s) := by simp [and_comm]
#align multiset.filter_comm Multiset.filter_comm
theorem filter_add_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p s + filter q s = filter (fun a => p a ∨ q a) s + filter (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s :=
Multiset.induction_on s rfl fun a s IH => by by_cases p a <;> by_cases q a <;> simp [*]
#align multiset.filter_add_filter Multiset.filter_add_filter
theorem filter_add_not (s : Multiset α) : filter p s + filter (fun a => ¬p a) s = s := by
rw [filter_add_filter, filter_eq_self.2, filter_eq_nil.2]
· simp only [add_zero]
· simp [Decidable.em, -Bool.not_eq_true, -not_and, not_and_or, or_comm]
· simp only [Bool.not_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq, Bool.eq_false_or_eq_true,
decide_True, implies_true, Decidable.em]
#align multiset.filter_add_not Multiset.filter_add_not
theorem map_filter (f : β → α) (s : Multiset β) : filter p (map f s) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [List.map_filter]; rfl
#align multiset.map_filter Multiset.map_filter
lemma map_filter' {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Multiset α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [(· ∘ ·), map_filter, hf.eq_iff]
#align multiset.map_filter' Multiset.map_filter'
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Multiset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
card (s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ≤ s, n < card s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a := by
fconstructor
· intro H s' hs' s'_card
by_contra! rid
have card := card_le_card (monotone_filter_left P hs') |>.trans H
exact s'_card.not_le (filter_eq_self.mpr rid ▸ card)
· contrapose!
exact fun H ↦ ⟨s.filter P, filter_le _ _, H, fun a ha ↦ (mem_filter.mp ha).2⟩
/-! ### Simultaneously filter and map elements of a multiset -/
/-- `filterMap f s` is a combination filter/map operation on `s`.
The function `f : α → Option β` is applied to each element of `s`;
if `f a` is `some b` then `b` is added to the result, otherwise
`a` is removed from the resulting multiset. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (List.filterMap f l : Multiset β))
fun _l₁ _l₂ h => Quot.sound <| h.filterMap f
#align multiset.filter_map Multiset.filterMap
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma filterMap_coe (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) : filterMap f l = l.filterMap f := rfl
#align multiset.coe_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_coe
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_zero (f : α → Option β) : filterMap f 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.filter_map_zero Multiset.filterMap_zero
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_cons_none {f : α → Option β} (a : α) (s : Multiset α) (h : f a = none) :
filterMap f (a ::ₘ s) = filterMap f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_cons_none a l h
#align multiset.filter_map_cons_none Multiset.filterMap_cons_none
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_cons_some (f : α → Option β) (a : α) (s : Multiset α) {b : β}
(h : f a = some b) : filterMap f (a ::ₘ s) = b ::ₘ filterMap f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_cons_some f a l h
#align multiset.filter_map_cons_some Multiset.filterMap_cons_some
theorem filterMap_eq_map (f : α → β) : filterMap (some ∘ f) = map f :=
funext fun s =>
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| congr_fun (List.filterMap_eq_map f) l
#align multiset.filter_map_eq_map Multiset.filterMap_eq_map
theorem filterMap_eq_filter : filterMap (Option.guard p) = filter p :=
funext fun s =>
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| by
rw [← List.filterMap_eq_filter]
congr; funext a; simp
#align multiset.filter_map_eq_filter Multiset.filterMap_eq_filter
theorem filterMap_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (g : β → Option γ) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap g (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).bind g) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_filterMap f g l
#align multiset.filter_map_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_filterMap
theorem map_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (g : β → γ) (s : Multiset α) :
map g (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).map g) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.map_filterMap f g l
#align multiset.map_filter_map Multiset.map_filterMap
theorem filterMap_map (f : α → β) (g : β → Option γ) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap g (map f s) = filterMap (g ∘ f) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_map f g l
#align multiset.filter_map_map Multiset.filterMap_map
theorem filter_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).filter p) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_filterMap f p l
#align multiset.filter_filter_map Multiset.filter_filterMap
theorem filterMap_filter (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap f (filter p s) = filterMap (fun x => if p x then f x else none) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| by simpa using List.filterMap_filter p f l
#align multiset.filter_map_filter Multiset.filterMap_filter
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_some (s : Multiset α) : filterMap some s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_some l
#align multiset.filter_map_some Multiset.filterMap_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filterMap f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = some b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => List.mem_filterMap f l
#align multiset.mem_filter_map Multiset.mem_filterMap
theorem map_filterMap_of_inv (f : α → Option β) (g : β → α) (H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x)
(s : Multiset α) : map g (filterMap f s) = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.map_filterMap_of_inv f g H l
#align multiset.map_filter_map_of_inv Multiset.map_filterMap_of_inv
theorem filterMap_le_filterMap (f : α → Option β) {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) :
filterMap f s ≤ filterMap f t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.filterMap _).subperm
#align multiset.filter_map_le_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_le_filterMap
/-! ### countP -/
/-- `countP p s` counts the number of elements of `s` (with multiplicity) that
satisfy `p`. -/
def countP (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s (List.countP p) fun _l₁ _l₂ => Perm.countP_eq (p ·)
#align multiset.countp Multiset.countP
@[simp]
theorem coe_countP (l : List α) : countP p l = l.countP p :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_countp Multiset.coe_countP
@[simp]
theorem countP_zero : countP p 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.countp_zero Multiset.countP_zero
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem countP_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → countP p (a ::ₘ s) = countP p s + 1 :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simpa using List.countP_cons_of_pos (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_cons_of_pos Multiset.countP_cons_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem countP_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬p a → countP p (a ::ₘ s) = countP p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simpa using List.countP_cons_of_neg (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_cons_of_neg Multiset.countP_cons_of_neg
variable (p)
theorem countP_cons (b : α) (s) : countP p (b ::ₘ s) = countP p s + if p b then 1 else 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simp [List.countP_cons]
#align multiset.countp_cons Multiset.countP_cons
theorem countP_eq_card_filter (s) : countP p s = card (filter p s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => l.countP_eq_length_filter (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_eq_card_filter Multiset.countP_eq_card_filter
theorem countP_le_card (s) : countP p s ≤ card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => countP_le_length (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_le_card Multiset.countP_le_card
@[simp]
theorem countP_add (s t) : countP p (s + t) = countP p s + countP p t := by
simp [countP_eq_card_filter]
#align multiset.countp_add Multiset.countP_add
@[simp]
theorem countP_nsmul (s) (n : ℕ) : countP p (n • s) = n * countP p s := by
induction n <;> simp [*, succ_nsmul, succ_mul, zero_nsmul]
#align multiset.countp_nsmul Multiset.countP_nsmul
theorem card_eq_countP_add_countP (s) : card s = countP p s + countP (fun x => ¬p x) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [l.length_eq_countP_add_countP p]
#align multiset.card_eq_countp_add_countp Multiset.card_eq_countP_add_countP
/-- `countP p`, the number of elements of a multiset satisfying `p`, promoted to an
`AddMonoidHom`. -/
def countPAddMonoidHom : Multiset α →+ ℕ where
toFun := countP p
map_zero' := countP_zero _
map_add' := countP_add _
#align multiset.countp_add_monoid_hom Multiset.countPAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_countPAddMonoidHom : (countPAddMonoidHom p : Multiset α → ℕ) = countP p :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_countp_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_countPAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem countP_sub [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) :
countP p (s - t) = countP p s - countP p t := by
simp [countP_eq_card_filter, h, filter_le_filter]
#align multiset.countp_sub Multiset.countP_sub
theorem countP_le_of_le {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : countP p s ≤ countP p t := by
simpa [countP_eq_card_filter] using card_le_card (filter_le_filter p h)
#align multiset.countp_le_of_le Multiset.countP_le_of_le
@[simp]
theorem countP_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
countP p (filter q s) = countP (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s := by simp [countP_eq_card_filter]
#align multiset.countp_filter Multiset.countP_filter
theorem countP_eq_countP_filter_add (s) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
countP p s = (filter q s).countP p + (filter (fun a => ¬q a) s).countP p :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert l.countP_eq_countP_filter_add (p ·) (q ·)
simp [countP_filter]
#align multiset.countp_eq_countp_filter_add Multiset.countP_eq_countP_filter_add
@[simp]
theorem countP_True {s : Multiset α} : countP (fun _ => True) s = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.countP_true
#align multiset.countp_true Multiset.countP_True
@[simp]
theorem countP_False {s : Multiset α} : countP (fun _ => False) s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.countP_false
#align multiset.countp_false Multiset.countP_False
theorem countP_map (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
countP p (map f s) = card (s.filter fun a => p (f a)) := by
refine Multiset.induction_on s ?_ fun a t IH => ?_
· rw [map_zero, countP_zero, filter_zero, card_zero]
· rw [map_cons, countP_cons, IH, filter_cons, card_add, apply_ite card, card_zero, card_singleton,
add_comm]
#align multiset.countp_map Multiset.countP_map
-- Porting note: `Lean.Internal.coeM` forces us to type-ascript `{a // a ∈ s}`
lemma countP_attach (s : Multiset α) : s.attach.countP (fun a : {a // a ∈ s} ↦ p a) = s.countP p :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, coe_countP]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [quot_mk_to_coe, coe_attach, coe_countP]
-- exact List.countP_attach _ _
rw [coe_attach]
refine (coe_countP _ _).trans ?_
convert List.countP_attach _ _
rfl
#align multiset.countp_attach Multiset.countP_attach
lemma filter_attach (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.attach.filter fun a : {a // a ∈ s} ↦ p ↑a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ ↦ Multiset.mem_of_mem_filter) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ congr_arg _ (List.filter_attach l p)
#align multiset.filter_attach Multiset.filter_attach
variable {p}
theorem countP_pos {s} : 0 < countP p s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simpa using List.countP_pos (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_pos Multiset.countP_pos
theorem countP_eq_zero {s} : countP p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simp [List.countP_eq_zero]
#align multiset.countp_eq_zero Multiset.countP_eq_zero
theorem countP_eq_card {s} : countP p s = card s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simp [List.countP_eq_length]
#align multiset.countp_eq_card Multiset.countP_eq_card
theorem countP_pos_of_mem {s a} (h : a ∈ s) (pa : p a) : 0 < countP p s :=
countP_pos.2 ⟨_, h, pa⟩
#align multiset.countp_pos_of_mem Multiset.countP_pos_of_mem
theorem countP_congr {s s' : Multiset α} (hs : s = s')
{p p' : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred p']
(hp : ∀ x ∈ s, p x = p' x) : s.countP p = s'.countP p' := by
revert hs hp
exact Quot.induction_on₂ s s'
(fun l l' hs hp => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_eq_coe] at hs
apply hs.countP_congr
simpa using hp)
#align multiset.countp_congr Multiset.countP_congr
end
/-! ### Multiplicity of an element -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α}
/-- `count a s` is the multiplicity of `a` in `s`. -/
def count (a : α) : Multiset α → ℕ :=
countP (a = ·)
#align multiset.count Multiset.count
@[simp]
theorem coe_count (a : α) (l : List α) : count a (ofList l) = l.count a := by
simp_rw [count, List.count, coe_countP (a = ·) l, @eq_comm _ a]
rfl
#align multiset.coe_count Multiset.coe_count
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this at EOF, but not right now
theorem count_zero (a : α) : count a 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.count_zero Multiset.count_zero
@[simp]
theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a (a ::ₘ s) = count a s + 1 :=
countP_cons_of_pos _ <| rfl
#align multiset.count_cons_self Multiset.count_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (s : Multiset α) : count a (b ::ₘ s) = count a s :=
countP_cons_of_neg _ <| h
#align multiset.count_cons_of_ne Multiset.count_cons_of_ne
theorem count_le_card (a : α) (s) : count a s ≤ card s :=
countP_le_card _ _
#align multiset.count_le_card Multiset.count_le_card
theorem count_le_of_le (a : α) {s t} : s ≤ t → count a s ≤ count a t :=
countP_le_of_le _
#align multiset.count_le_of_le Multiset.count_le_of_le
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a s ≤ count a (b ::ₘ s) :=
count_le_of_le _ (le_cons_self _ _)
#align multiset.count_le_count_cons Multiset.count_le_count_cons
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) :
count a (b ::ₘ s) = count a s + if a = b then 1 else 0 :=
countP_cons (a = ·) _ _
#align multiset.count_cons Multiset.count_cons
theorem count_singleton_self (a : α) : count a ({a} : Multiset α) = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem (nodup_singleton a) <| mem_singleton_self a
#align multiset.count_singleton_self Multiset.count_singleton_self
theorem count_singleton (a b : α) : count a ({b} : Multiset α) = if a = b then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [count_cons, ← cons_zero, count_zero, zero_add]
#align multiset.count_singleton Multiset.count_singleton
@[simp]
theorem count_add (a : α) : ∀ s t, count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t :=
countP_add _
#align multiset.count_add Multiset.count_add
/-- `count a`, the multiplicity of `a` in a multiset, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def countAddMonoidHom (a : α) : Multiset α →+ ℕ :=
countPAddMonoidHom (a = ·)
#align multiset.count_add_monoid_hom Multiset.countAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_countAddMonoidHom {a : α} : (countAddMonoidHom a : Multiset α → ℕ) = count a :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_count_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_countAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem count_nsmul (a : α) (n s) : count a (n • s) = n * count a s := by
induction n <;> simp [*, succ_nsmul, succ_mul, zero_nsmul]
#align multiset.count_nsmul Multiset.count_nsmul
@[simp]
lemma count_attach (a : {x // x ∈ s}) : s.attach.count a = s.count ↑a :=
Eq.trans (countP_congr rfl fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
#align multiset.count_attach Multiset.count_attach
theorem count_pos {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : 0 < count a s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [count, countP_pos]
#align multiset.count_pos Multiset.count_pos
theorem one_le_count_iff_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : 1 ≤ count a s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [succ_le_iff, count_pos]
#align multiset.one_le_count_iff_mem Multiset.one_le_count_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) : count a s = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h' => h <| count_pos.1 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
#align multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem Multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem
lemma count_ne_zero {a : α} : count a s ≠ 0 ↔ a ∈ s := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm.trans count_pos
#align multiset.count_ne_zero Multiset.count_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma count_eq_zero {a : α} : count a s = 0 ↔ a ∉ s := count_ne_zero.not_right
#align multiset.count_eq_zero Multiset.count_eq_zero
theorem count_eq_card {a : α} {s} : count a s = card s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a = x := by
simp [countP_eq_card, count, @eq_comm _ a]
#align multiset.count_eq_card Multiset.count_eq_card
@[simp]
theorem count_replicate_self (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (replicate n a) = n := by
convert List.count_replicate_self a n
rw [← coe_count, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.count_replicate_self Multiset.count_replicate_self
theorem count_replicate (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (replicate n b) = if a = b then n else 0 := by
convert List.count_replicate a b n
rw [← coe_count, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.count_replicate Multiset.count_replicate
@[simp]
theorem count_erase_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a (erase s a) = count a s - 1 :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert List.count_erase_self a l <;> rw [← coe_count] <;> simp
#align multiset.count_erase_self Multiset.count_erase_self
@[simp]
theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) (s : Multiset α) :
count a (erase s b) = count a s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert List.count_erase_of_ne ab l <;> rw [← coe_count] <;> simp
#align multiset.count_erase_of_ne Multiset.count_erase_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem count_sub (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t := by
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun b t IH s => ?_
rw [sub_cons, IH]
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne a b with rfl | ab
· rw [count_erase_self, count_cons_self, Nat.sub_sub, add_comm]
· rw [count_erase_of_ne ab, count_cons_of_ne ab]
#align multiset.count_sub Multiset.count_sub
@[simp]
theorem count_union (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s ∪ t) = max (count a s) (count a t) := by
simp [(· ∪ ·), union, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
#align multiset.count_union Multiset.count_union
@[simp]
theorem count_inter (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s ∩ t) = min (count a s) (count a t) := by
apply @Nat.add_left_cancel (count a (s - t))
rw [← count_add, sub_add_inter, count_sub, Nat.sub_add_min_cancel]
#align multiset.count_inter Multiset.count_inter
theorem le_count_iff_replicate_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} :
n ≤ count a s ↔ replicate n a ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', mem_coe, coe_count]
exact le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.trans replicate_le_coe.symm
#align multiset.le_count_iff_replicate_le Multiset.le_count_iff_replicate_le
@[simp]
theorem count_filter_of_pos {p} [DecidablePred p] {a} {s : Multiset α} (h : p a) :
count a (filter p s) = count a s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', filter_coe, mem_coe, coe_count, decide_eq_true_eq]
apply count_filter
simpa using h
#align multiset.count_filter_of_pos Multiset.count_filter_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem count_filter_of_neg {p} [DecidablePred p] {a} {s : Multiset α} (h : ¬p a) :
count a (filter p s) = 0 :=
Multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem fun t => h (of_mem_filter t)
#align multiset.count_filter_of_neg Multiset.count_filter_of_neg
theorem count_filter {p} [DecidablePred p] {a} {s : Multiset α} :
count a (filter p s) = if p a then count a s else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_filter_of_pos h
· exact count_filter_of_neg h
#align multiset.count_filter Multiset.count_filter
theorem ext {s t : Multiset α} : s = t ↔ ∀ a, count a s = count a t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => Quotient.eq.trans <| by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, filter_coe, mem_coe, coe_count, decide_eq_true_eq]
apply perm_iff_count
#align multiset.ext Multiset.ext
@[ext]
theorem ext' {s t : Multiset α} : (∀ a, count a s = count a t) → s = t :=
ext.2
#align multiset.ext' Multiset.ext'
@[simp]
theorem coe_inter (s t : List α) : (s ∩ t : Multiset α) = (s.bagInter t : List α) := by ext; simp
#align multiset.coe_inter Multiset.coe_inter
theorem le_iff_count {s t : Multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ count a t :=
⟨fun h a => count_le_of_le a h, fun al => by
rw [← (ext.2 fun a => by simp [max_eq_right (al a)] : s ∪ t = t)]; apply le_union_left⟩
#align multiset.le_iff_count Multiset.le_iff_count
instance : DistribLattice (Multiset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := fun s t u =>
le_of_eq <|
Eq.symm <|
ext.2 fun a => by
simp only [max_min_distrib_left, Multiset.count_inter, Multiset.sup_eq_union,
Multiset.count_union, Multiset.inf_eq_inter] }
theorem count_map {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) [DecidableEq β] (b : β) :
count b (map f s) = card (s.filter fun a => b = f a) := by
simp [Bool.beq_eq_decide_eq, eq_comm, count, countP_map]
#align multiset.count_map Multiset.count_map
/-- `Multiset.map f` preserves `count` if `f` is injective on the set of elements contained in
the multiset -/
theorem count_map_eq_count [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α)
(hf : Set.InjOn f { x : α | x ∈ s }) (x) (H : x ∈ s) : (s.map f).count (f x) = s.count x := by
suffices (filter (fun a : α => f x = f a) s).count x = card (filter (fun a : α => f x = f a) s) by
rw [count, countP_map, ← this]
exact count_filter_of_pos <| rfl
· rw [eq_replicate_card.2 fun b hb => (hf H (mem_filter.1 hb).left _).symm]
· simp only [count_replicate, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, card_replicate]
· simp only [mem_filter, beq_iff_eq, and_imp, @eq_comm _ (f x), imp_self, implies_true]
#align multiset.count_map_eq_count Multiset.count_map_eq_count
/-- `Multiset.map f` preserves `count` if `f` is injective -/
theorem count_map_eq_count' [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(x : α) : (s.map f).count (f x) = s.count x := by
by_cases H : x ∈ s
· exact count_map_eq_count f _ hf.injOn _ H
· rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem H, count_eq_zero, mem_map]
rintro ⟨k, hks, hkx⟩
rw [hf hkx] at hks
contradiction
#align multiset.count_map_eq_count' Multiset.count_map_eq_count'
@[simp]
theorem sub_filter_eq_filter_not [DecidableEq α] (p) [DecidablePred p] (s : Multiset α) :
s - s.filter p = s.filter (fun a ↦ ¬ p a) := by
ext a; by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
theorem filter_eq' (s : Multiset α) (b : α) : s.filter (· = b) = replicate (count b s) b :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, filter_coe, mem_coe, coe_count]
rw [List.filter_eq l b, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.filter_eq' Multiset.filter_eq'
theorem filter_eq (s : Multiset α) (b : α) : s.filter (Eq b) = replicate (count b s) b := by
simp_rw [← filter_eq', eq_comm]
#align multiset.filter_eq Multiset.filter_eq
@[simp]
theorem replicate_inter (n : ℕ) (x : α) (s : Multiset α) :
replicate n x ∩ s = replicate (min n (s.count x)) x := by
ext y
rw [count_inter, count_replicate, count_replicate]
by_cases h : y = x
· simp only [h, if_true]
· simp only [h, if_false, Nat.zero_min]
#align multiset.replicate_inter Multiset.replicate_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_replicate (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
s ∩ replicate n x = replicate (min (s.count x) n) x := by
rw [inter_comm, replicate_inter, min_comm]
#align multiset.inter_replicate Multiset.inter_replicate
theorem erase_attach_map_val (s : Multiset α) (x : {x // x ∈ s}) :
(s.attach.erase x).map (↑) = s.erase x := by
rw [Multiset.map_erase _ val_injective, attach_map_val]
theorem erase_attach_map (s : Multiset α) (f : α → β) (x : {x // x ∈ s}) :
(s.attach.erase x).map (fun j : {x // x ∈ s} ↦ f j) = (s.erase x).map f := by
simp only [← Function.comp_apply (f := f)]
rw [← map_map, erase_attach_map_val]
end
@[ext]
theorem addHom_ext [AddZeroClass β] ⦃f g : Multiset α →+ β⦄ (h : ∀ x, f {x} = g {x}) : f = g := by
ext s
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with a s ih
· simp only [_root_.map_zero]
· simp only [← singleton_add, _root_.map_add, ih, h]
#align multiset.add_hom_ext Multiset.addHom_ext
section Embedding
@[simp]
theorem map_le_map_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) {s t : Multiset α} :
s.map f ≤ t.map f ↔ s ≤ t := by
classical
refine ⟨fun h => le_iff_count.mpr fun a => ?_, map_le_map⟩
simpa [count_map_eq_count' f _ hf] using le_iff_count.mp h (f a)
#align multiset.map_le_map_iff Multiset.map_le_map_iff
/-- Associate to an embedding `f` from `α` to `β` the order embedding that maps a multiset to its
image under `f`. -/
@[simps!]
def mapEmbedding (f : α ↪ β) : Multiset α ↪o Multiset β :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (map f) fun _ _ => map_le_map_iff f.inj'
#align multiset.map_embedding Multiset.mapEmbedding
#align multiset.map_embedding_apply Multiset.mapEmbedding_apply
end Embedding
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,723 | 2,724 | theorem count_eq_card_filter_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) (a : α) :
s.count a = card (s.filter (a = ·)) := by | rw [count, countP_eq_card_filter]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jz Pan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jz Pan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Nilpotent
/-!
# Polynomials over an irreducible ring
This file contains results about the polynomials over an irreducible ring (i.e. a ring with only
one minimal prime ideal, equivalently, whose spectrum is an irreducible topological space).
## Main results
- `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map_of_isPrime_nilradical`: a monic polynomial over
an irreducible ring is irreducible if it is irreducible after mapping into an integral domain.
A generalization to `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map`.
## Tags
polynomial, irreducible ring, nilradical, prime ideal
-/
open scoped Classical Polynomial
open Polynomial
noncomputable section
/-- A polynomial over an irreducible ring `R` is irreducible if it is monic and irreducible after
mapping into an integral domain `S` (https://math.stackexchange.com/a/4843432/235999).
A generalization to `Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/IrreducibleRing.lean | 37 | 61 | theorem Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_of_irreducible_map_of_isPrime_nilradical
{R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [(nilradical R).IsPrime] [CommRing S] [IsDomain S]
(φ : R →+* S) (f : R[X]) (hm : f.Monic) (hi : Irreducible (f.map φ)) : Irreducible f := by |
let R' := R ⧸ nilradical R
let ψ : R' →+* S := Ideal.Quotient.lift (nilradical R) φ
(haveI := RingHom.ker_isPrime φ; nilradical_le_prime (RingHom.ker φ))
let ι := algebraMap R R'
rw [show φ = ψ.comp ι from rfl, ← map_map] at hi
replace hi := hm.map ι |>.irreducible_of_irreducible_map _ _ hi
refine ⟨fun h ↦ hi.1 <| (mapRingHom ι).isUnit_map h, fun a b h ↦ ?_⟩
wlog hb : IsUnit (b.map ι) generalizing a b
· exact (this b a (mul_comm a b ▸ h)
(hi.2 _ _ (by rw [h, Polynomial.map_mul]) |>.resolve_right hb)).symm
have hn (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : IsNilpotent (b.coeff i) := by
obtain ⟨_, _, h⟩ := Polynomial.isUnit_iff.1 hb
simpa only [coeff_map, coeff_C, hi, ite_false, ← RingHom.mem_ker,
show RingHom.ker ι = nilradical R from Ideal.mk_ker] using congr(coeff $(h.symm) i)
refine .inr <| isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent (isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_right
(x := a.coeff f.natDegree) <| (IsUnit.neg_iff _).1 ?_) hn
have hc : f.leadingCoeff = _ := congr(coeff $h f.natDegree)
rw [hm, coeff_mul, Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ fun i j ↦ a.coeff i * b.coeff j,
Finset.sum_range_succ, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, Nat.sub_self] at hc
rw [← add_sub_cancel_left 1 (-(_ * _)), ← sub_eq_add_neg, hc]
exact IsNilpotent.isUnit_sub_one <| show _ ∈ nilradical R from sum_mem fun i hi ↦
Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ <| hn _ <| Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt (List.mem_range.1 hi)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical symmDiff
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_is_measurably_generated MeasureTheory.ae_isMeasurablyGenerated
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
#align measure_theory.ae_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union MeasureTheory.measure_union
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union' MeasureTheory.measure_union'
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_inter_add_diff
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_diff_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter'
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union] using measure_union disjoint_sdiff_sdiff (ht.diff hs)
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_compl
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion₀
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion₀
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset₀
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
#align measure_theory.tsum_meas_le_meas_Union_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_null' MeasureTheory.measure_diff_null'
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) : μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union' disjoint_sdiff_right hs, union_diff_self]
#align measure_theory.measure_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_add_diff
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : MeasurableSet t) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
Eq.symm <| ENNReal.sub_eq_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff' MeasureTheory.measure_diff'
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff MeasureTheory.measure_diff
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
#align measure_theory.le_measure_diff MeasureTheory.le_measure_diff
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := (WithTop.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩).symm
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} :
μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
#align measure_theory.measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_compl
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} {t : β → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ b, s b ⊆ t b) (h_le : ∀ b, μ (t b) ≤ μ (s b)) : μ (⋃ b, s b) = μ (⋃ b, t b) := by
rcases Classical.em (∃ b, μ (t b) = ∞) with (⟨b, hb⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ b, s b) = ∞ := top_unique (hb ▸ (h_le b).trans <| measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, t b) := Eq.symm <| top_unique <| hb ▸ measure_mono (subset_iUnion _ _)
push_neg at htop
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono (iUnion_mono hsub)) ?_
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_union_congr_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b, s b) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _b => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _b =>
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_toMeasurable
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_toMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_to_measurable_union MeasureTheory.measure_toMeasurable_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_union_toMeasurable
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i)) (H : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily
-measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
generalize ht : Function.extend Encodable.encode s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion,
iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective, (· ∘ ·), Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty,
measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) ≤ μ (⋃ n, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun i => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
have hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) (Accumulate f) := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rli ↦ le_trans rli rik,
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rlj ↦ le_trans rlj rjk⟩
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd.directed_val, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le _ k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (MeasurableSet.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
· rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· rw [tsub_le_iff_right, ← measure_union, Set.union_comm]
· exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 Subset.rfl)
· apply disjoint_sdiff_left
· apply h i
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
#align measure_theory.measure_Inter_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_iInter_eq_iInf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
let s := fun i ↦ ⋂ j ≤ i, f j
have iInter_eq : ⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i, s i := by
ext x; simp [s]; constructor
· exact fun h _ j _ ↦ h j
· intro h i
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact h j i rij
have ms : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i) :=
fun i ↦ MeasurableSet.biInter (countable_univ.mono <| subset_univ _) fun i _ ↦ h i
have hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biInter_subset_biInter_left fun j rji ↦ le_trans rji rik,
biInter_subset_biInter_left fun i rij ↦ le_trans rij rjk⟩
have hfin' : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞ := by
rcases hfin with ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact ⟨j, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hi <| measure_mono <| biInter_subset_of_mem rij⟩
exact iInter_eq ▸ measure_iInter_eq_iInf ms hd hfin'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Countable ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hm.directed_le]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Union MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup']
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf hs hm.directed_ge hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Inter MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iInter
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ∈ {j | j ≤ i}, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf' hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, MeasurableSet (s r)) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun l hl => ?_, fun L hL => ?_⟩
· filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := Ioi a)] with r hr using hl.trans_le
(measure_mono (biInter_subset_of_mem hr))
obtain ⟨u, u_anti, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ι, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, a < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, ar, _⟩
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto' ar with ⟨w, w_anti, w_mem, w_lim⟩
exact ⟨w, w_anti, fun n => (w_mem n).1, w_lim⟩
have A : Tendsto (μ ∘ s ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s (u n)))) := by
refine tendsto_measure_iInter (fun n => hs _ (u_pos n)) ?_ ?_
· intro m n hmn
exact hm _ _ (u_pos n) (u_anti.antitone hmn)
· rcases hf with ⟨r, rpos, hr⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 r rpos).exists
refine ⟨n, ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hr.lt_top)⟩
exact measure_mono (hm _ _ (u_pos n) hn.le)
have B : ⋂ n, s (u n) = ⋂ r > a, s r := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro r rpos
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < r := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ rpos).exists
exact Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ n) (hm (u n) r (u_pos n) hn.le)
· simp only [subset_iInter_iff, gt_iff_lt]
intro n
apply biInter_subset_of_mem
exact u_pos n
rw [B] at A
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, μ (s (u n)) < L := ((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ hL).exists
have : Ioc a (u n) ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, u_pos n⟩
filter_upwards [this] with r hr using lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (hm _ _ hr.1 hr.2)) hn
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_bInter_gt MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_biInter_gt
/-- One direction of the **Borel-Cantelli lemma** (sometimes called the "*first* Borel-Cantelli
lemma"): if (sᵢ) is a sequence of sets such that `∑ μ sᵢ` is finite, then the limit superior of the
`sᵢ` is a null set.
Note: for the *second* Borel-Cantelli lemma (applying to independent sets in a probability space),
see `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one`. -/
theorem measure_limsup_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (hs : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (limsup s atTop) = 0 := by
-- First we replace the sequence `sₙ` with a sequence of measurable sets `tₙ ⊇ sₙ` of the same
-- measure.
set t : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (s n)
have ht : (∑' i, μ (t i)) ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [t, measure_toMeasurable] using hs
suffices μ (limsup t atTop) = 0 by
have A : s ≤ t := fun n => subset_toMeasurable μ (s n)
-- TODO default args fail
exact measure_mono_null (limsup_le_limsup (eventually_of_forall (Pi.le_def.mp A))) this
-- Next we unfold `limsup` for sets and replace equality with an inequality
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', Set.iInf_eq_iInter, Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, ←
nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
-- Finally, we estimate `μ (⋃ i, t (i + n))` by `∑ i', μ (t (i + n))`
refine
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto'
(tendsto_measure_iInter
(fun i => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) ?_
⟨0, ne_top_of_le_ne_top ht (measure_iUnion_le t)⟩)
(ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add (μ ∘ t) ht) fun n => measure_iUnion_le _
intro n m hnm x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
exact fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i + (m - n), by simpa only [add_assoc, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hnm] using hi⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_limsup_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero
theorem measure_liminf_eq_zero {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≠ ∞) :
μ (liminf s atTop) = 0 := by
rw [← le_zero_iff]
have : liminf s atTop ≤ limsup s atTop := liminf_le_limsup
exact (μ.mono this).trans (by simp [measure_limsup_eq_zero h])
#align measure_theory.measure_liminf_eq_zero MeasureTheory.measure_liminf_eq_zero
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : limsup (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.limsup_sdiff s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_limsup s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` above because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (s : ℕ → Set α) {t : Set α}
(h : ∀ n, s n =ᵐ[μ] t) : liminf (α := Set α) s atTop =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp_rw [ae_eq_set] at h ⊢
constructor
· rw [atTop.liminf_sdiff s t]
apply measure_liminf_eq_zero
simp [h]
· rw [atTop.sdiff_liminf s t]
apply measure_limsup_eq_zero
simp [h]
#align measure_theory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq MeasureTheory.liminf_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align measure_theory.measure_if MeasureTheory.measure_if
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.le_to_outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.to_measure_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.toMeasure_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
#align measure_theory.le_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.le_toMeasure_apply
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
#align measure_theory.to_measure_apply₀ MeasureTheory.toMeasure_apply₀
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
#align measure_theory.to_outer_measure_to_measure MeasureTheory.toOuterMeasure_toMeasure
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
#align measure_theory.bounded_by_measure MeasureTheory.boundedBy_measure
end OuterMeasure
section
/- Porting note: These variables are wrapped by an anonymous section because they interrupt
synthesizing instances in `MeasureSpace` section. -/
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_inter MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_inter
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero [MeasurableSpace α] : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.instZero
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_zero
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.subsingleton MeasureTheory.Measure.instSubsingleton
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
#align measure_theory.measure.eq_zero_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.eq_zero_of_isEmpty
instance instInhabited [MeasurableSpace α] : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.Measure.instInhabited
instance instAdd [MeasurableSpace α] : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_add MeasureTheory.Measure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.add_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_add
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.add_apply
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul [MeasurableSpace α] : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.smul_apply
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Measure.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_scalar_tower MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsScalarTower
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Measure.instIsCentralScalar
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instMulAction
instance instAddCommMonoid [MeasurableSpace α] : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.Measure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_add_hom MeasureTheory.Measure.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_finset_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align measure_theory.measure.finset_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.finset_sum_apply
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[MeasurableSpace α] : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.Measure.instDistribMulAction
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.measure.module MeasureTheory.Measure.instModule
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.coe_nnreal_smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure_iff {p : α → Prop} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp only [ae_iff, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, or_iff_right_iff_imp, mul_eq_zero]
simp only [IsEmpty.forall_iff, hc]
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_smul_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_smul_measure_iff
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_left MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_to_measurable_add_inter_right MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder [MeasurableSpace α] : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl m s := le_rfl
le_trans m₁ m₂ m₃ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
#align measure_theory.measure.partial_order MeasureTheory.Measure.instPartialOrder
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_le MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_le
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.le_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.le_iff'
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
#align measure_theory.measure.lt_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.lt_iff'
instance covariantAddLE [MeasurableSpace α] :
CovariantClass (Measure α) (Measure α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.covariant_add_le MeasureTheory.Measure.covariantAddLE
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_left MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_left
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
#align measure_theory.measure.le_add_right MeasureTheory.Measure.le_add_right
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_caratheodory MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_caratheodory
instance [MeasurableSpace α] : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.Inf_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sInf_apply
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun μ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_semilattice_Inf MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteSemilatticeInf
instance instCompleteLattice [MeasurableSpace α] : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun μ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
#align measure_theory.measure.complete_lattice MeasureTheory.Measure.instCompleteLattice
end sInf
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.to_measure_top MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top [MeasurableSpace α] :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.to_outer_measure_top MeasureTheory.Measure.toOuterMeasure_top
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.top_add MeasureTheory.Measure.top_add
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.add_top MeasureTheory.Measure.add_top
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
#align measure_theory.measure.zero_le MeasureTheory.Measure.zero_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.nonpos_iff_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_ne_zero
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_univ_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_pos
/-! ### Pushforward and pullback -/
/-- Lift a linear map between `OuterMeasure` spaces such that for each measure `μ` every measurable
set is caratheodory-measurable w.r.t. `f μ` to a linear map between `Measure` spaces. -/
def liftLinear {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β)
(hf : ∀ μ : Measure α, ‹_› ≤ (f μ.toOuterMeasure).caratheodory) :
Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β where
toFun μ := (f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure (hf μ)
map_add' μ₁ μ₂ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [map_add, coe_add, Pi.add_apply, toMeasure_apply, add_toOuterMeasure,
OuterMeasure.coe_add, hs]
map_smul' c μ := ext fun s hs => by
simp only [LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply,
toMeasure_apply, smul_toOuterMeasure (R := ℝ≥0∞), OuterMeasure.coe_smul (R := ℝ≥0∞),
smul_apply, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear
lemma liftLinear_apply₀ {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (liftLinear f hf μ)) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply₀ _ (hf μ) hs
@[simp]
theorem liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : liftLinear f hf μ s = f μ.toOuterMeasure s :=
toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) hs
#align measure_theory.measure.lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.liftLinear_apply
theorem le_liftLinear_apply {f : OuterMeasure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] OuterMeasure β} (hf) (s : Set β) :
f μ.toOuterMeasure s ≤ liftLinear f hf μ s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ (hf μ) s
#align measure_theory.measure.le_lift_linear_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_liftLinear_apply
/-- The pushforward of a measure as a linear map. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not
a measurable function. -/
def mapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure α →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure β :=
if hf : Measurable f then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.map f) fun μ _s hs t =>
le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory μ _ (hf hs) (f ⁻¹' t)
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ
theorem mapₗ_congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
mapₗ f μ = mapₗ g μ := by
ext1 s hs
simpa only [mapₗ, hf, hg, hs, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply, OuterMeasure.map_apply]
using measure_congr (h.preimage s)
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_congr
/-- The pushforward of a measure. It is defined to be `0` if `f` is not an almost everywhere
measurable function. -/
irreducible_def map [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Measure β :=
if hf : AEMeasurable f μ then mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.map MeasureTheory.Measure.map
theorem mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
mapₗ (hf.mk f) μ = map f μ := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable
theorem mapₗ_apply_of_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (μ : Measure α) :
mapₗ f μ = map f μ := by
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable]
exact mapₗ_congr hf hf.aemeasurable.measurable_mk hf.aemeasurable.ae_eq_mk
#align measure_theory.measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.mapₗ_apply_of_measurable
@[simp]
theorem map_add (μ ν : Measure α) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ + ν).map f = μ.map f + ν.map f := by simp [← mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_add MeasureTheory.Measure.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : Measure α).map f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) <;> simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_of_not_aemeasurable {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ¬AEMeasurable f μ) :
μ.map f = 0 := by simp [map, hf]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_of_not_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_of_not_aemeasurable
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Measure.map f μ = Measure.map g μ := by
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hg : AEMeasurable g μ := hf.congr h
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hg]
exact
mapₗ_congr hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk (hf.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hg.ae_eq_mk))
· have hg : ¬AEMeasurable g μ := by simpa [← aemeasurable_congr h] using hf
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable, hf, hg]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.map_congr
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc); · simp
by_cases hf : AEMeasurable f μ
· have hfc : AEMeasurable f (c • μ) :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).2 hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp only [← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hf, ← mapₗ_mk_apply_of_aemeasurable hfc,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply]
congr 1
apply mapₗ_congr hfc.measurable_mk hf.measurable_mk
exact EventuallyEq.trans ((ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk.symm) hf.ae_eq_mk
· have hfc : ¬AEMeasurable f (c • μ) := by
intro hfc
exact hf ⟨hfc.mk f, hfc.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 hfc.ae_eq_mk⟩
simp [map_of_not_aemeasurable hf, map_of_not_aemeasurable hfc]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul
@[simp]
protected theorem map_smul_nnreal (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (f : α → β) :
(c • μ).map f = c • μ.map f :=
μ.map_smul (c : ℝ≥0∞) f
#align measure_theory.measure.map_smul_nnreal MeasureTheory.Measure.map_smul_nnreal
variable {f : α → β}
lemma map_apply₀ {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (map f μ)) : μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map, dif_pos hf, mapₗ, dif_pos hf.measurable_mk] at hs ⊢
rw [liftLinear_apply₀ _ hs, measure_congr (hf.ae_eq_mk.preimage s)]
rfl
/-- We can evaluate the pushforward on measurable sets. For non-measurable sets, see
`MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply` and `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
@[simp]
theorem map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := map_apply₀ hf hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply_of_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply_of_aemeasurable
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.map f s = μ (f ⁻¹' s) :=
map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable hs
#align measure_theory.measure.map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.map_apply
theorem map_toOuterMeasure (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
(μ.map f).toOuterMeasure = (OuterMeasure.map f μ.toOuterMeasure).trim := by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_trim_iff]
intro s hs
simp [hf, hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_to_outer_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.map_toOuterMeasure
@[simp] lemma map_eq_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf .univ, preimage_univ]
@[simp] lemma mapₗ_eq_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [mapₗ_apply_of_measurable hf, map_eq_zero_iff hf.aemeasurable]
lemma map_ne_zero_iff (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : μ.map f ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 := (map_eq_zero_iff hf).not
lemma mapₗ_ne_zero_iff (hf : Measurable f) : Measure.mapₗ f μ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
(mapₗ_eq_zero_iff hf).not
@[simp]
theorem map_id : map id μ = μ :=
ext fun _ => map_apply measurable_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' : map (fun x => x) μ = μ :=
map_id
#align measure_theory.measure.map_id' MeasureTheory.Measure.map_id'
theorem map_map {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : Measurable f) :
(μ.map f).map g = μ.map (g ∘ f) :=
ext fun s hs => by simp [hf, hg, hs, hg hs, hg.comp hf, ← preimage_comp]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_map MeasureTheory.Measure.map_map
@[mono]
theorem map_mono {f : α → β} (h : μ ≤ ν) (hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f ≤ ν.map f :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simp [hf.aemeasurable, hs, h _]
#align measure_theory.measure.map_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.map_mono
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, we can bound `map f μ s` from below.
See also `MeasurableEquiv.map_apply`. -/
theorem le_map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set β) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ.map f s :=
calc
μ (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ μ (f ⁻¹' toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) := by gcongr; apply subset_toMeasurable
_ = μ.map f (toMeasurable (μ.map f) s) :=
(map_apply_of_aemeasurable hf <| measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).symm
_ = μ.map f s := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_map_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_map_apply
theorem le_map_apply_image {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (s : Set α) :
μ s ≤ μ.map f (f '' s) :=
(measure_mono (subset_preimage_image f s)).trans (le_map_apply hf _)
/-- Even if `s` is not measurable, `map f μ s = 0` implies that `μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0`. -/
theorem preimage_null_of_map_null {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β}
(hs : μ.map f s = 0) : μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.mp <| (le_map_apply hf s).trans_eq hs
#align measure_theory.measure.preimage_null_of_map_null MeasureTheory.Measure.preimage_null_of_map_null
theorem tendsto_ae_map {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Tendsto f (ae μ) (ae (μ.map f)) :=
fun _ hs => preimage_null_of_map_null hf hs
#align measure_theory.measure.tendsto_ae_map MeasureTheory.Measure.tendsto_ae_map
/-- Pullback of a `Measure` as a linear map. If `f` sends each measurable set to a measurable
set, then for each measurable set `s` we have `comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s)`.
If the linearity is not needed, please use `comap` instead, which works for a larger class of
functions. -/
def comapₗ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Measure β →ₗ[ℝ≥0∞] Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s) then
liftLinear (OuterMeasure.comap f) fun μ s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
apply le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory
exact hf.2 s hs
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ
theorem comapₗ_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comapₗ, dif_pos, liftLinear_apply _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
exact ⟨hfi, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_apply
/-- Pullback of a `Measure`. If `f` sends each measurable set to a null-measurable set,
then for each measurable set `s` we have `comap f μ s = μ (f '' s)`. -/
def comap [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) : Measure α :=
if hf : Injective f ∧ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ then
(OuterMeasure.comap f μ.toOuterMeasure).toMeasure fun s hs t => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.comap_apply, image_inter hf.1, image_diff hf.1]
exact (measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ (hf.2 s hs)).symm
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comap
theorem comap_apply₀ [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (comap f μ)) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)] at hs ⊢
rw [toMeasure_apply₀ _ _ hs, OuterMeasure.comap_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply₀ MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply₀
theorem le_comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) (s : Set α) :
μ (f '' s) ≤ comap f μ s := by
rw [comap, dif_pos (And.intro hfi hf)]
exact le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_comap_apply
theorem comap_apply {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comap f μ s = μ (f '' s) :=
comap_apply₀ f μ hfi (fun s hs => (hf s hs).nullMeasurableSet) hs.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_apply
theorem comapₗ_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → MeasurableSet (f '' s)) (μ : Measure β)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : comapₗ f μ s = comap f μ s :=
(comapₗ_apply f hfi hf μ hs).trans (comap_apply f hfi hf μ hs).symm
#align measure_theory.measure.comapₗ_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.comapₗ_eq_comap
theorem measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {_mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
(f : α → β) (μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f)
(hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ) {s : Set α} (hs : comap f μ s = 0) :
μ (f '' s) = 0 :=
le_antisymm ((le_comap_apply f μ hfi hf s).trans hs.le) (zero_le _)
#align measure_theory.measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero
theorem ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s t : Set α} (hst : s =ᵐ[comap f μ] t) : f '' s =ᵐ[μ] f '' t := by
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_iff] at hst ⊢
have h_eq_α : { a : α | ¬s a = t a } = s \ t ∪ t \ s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
have h_eq_β : { a : β | ¬(f '' s) a = (f '' t) a } = f '' s \ f '' t ∪ f '' t \ f '' s := by
ext1 x
simp only [eq_iff_iff, mem_setOf_eq, mem_union, mem_diff]
tauto
rw [← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_diff hfi, ← Set.image_union] at h_eq_β
rw [h_eq_β]
rw [h_eq_α] at hst
exact measure_image_eq_zero_of_comap_eq_zero f μ hfi hf hst
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap
theorem NullMeasurableSet.image {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β)
(μ : Measure β) (hfi : Injective f) (hf : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ)
{s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (μ.comap f)) : NullMeasurableSet (f '' s) μ := by
refine ⟨toMeasurable μ (f '' toMeasurable (μ.comap f) s), measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _, ?_⟩
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq ?_).symm
swap
· exact hf _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
have h : toMeasurable (comap f μ) s =ᵐ[comap f μ] s :=
NullMeasurableSet.toMeasurable_ae_eq hs
exact ae_eq_image_of_ae_eq_comap f μ hfi hf h.symm
#align measure_theory.measure.null_measurable_set.image MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurableSet.image
theorem comap_preimage {β} [MeasurableSpace α] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure β)
{s : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (hf' : Measurable f)
(h : ∀ t, MeasurableSet t → NullMeasurableSet (f '' t) μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.comap f (f ⁻¹' s) = μ (s ∩ range f) := by
rw [comap_apply₀ _ _ hf h (hf' hs).nullMeasurableSet, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
#align measure_theory.measure.comap_preimage MeasureTheory.Measure.comap_preimage
section Sum
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
#align measure_theory.measure.sum MeasureTheory.Measure.sum
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
#align measure_theory.measure.le_sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.le_sum_apply
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = x₀`. For any Dirac mass
`δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure `sum δ_x`
gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any measurable set
containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one get `sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
#align measure_theory.measure.le_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.le_sum
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_apply_eq_zero' MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_apply_eq_zero'
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_comm MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_comm
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_sum_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_sum_iff
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_sum_iff' MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_sum_iff'
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_fintype MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_fintype
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_coe_finset MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_coe_finset
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_sum_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_sum_eq
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_bool MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_bool
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_cond MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_cond
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_of_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_of_empty
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_add_sum_compl MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_add_sum_compl
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_congr
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable]
#align measure_theory.measure.sum_add_sum MeasureTheory.Measure.sum_add_sum
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### Absolute continuity -/
/-- We say that `μ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `ν`, or that `μ` is dominated by `ν`,
if `ν(A) = 0` implies that `μ(A) = 0`. -/
def AbsolutelyContinuous {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, ν s = 0 → μ s = 0
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous]
scoped[MeasureTheory] infixl:50 " ≪ " => MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_le (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≪ ν := fun s hs =>
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| hs ▸ le_iff'.1 h s
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous_of_le MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le
alias _root_.LE.le.absolutelyContinuous := absolutelyContinuous_of_le
#align has_le.le.absolutely_continuous LE.le.absolutelyContinuous
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_eq (h : μ = ν) : μ ≪ ν :=
h.le.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous_of_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_eq
alias _root_.Eq.absolutelyContinuous := absolutelyContinuous_of_eq
#align eq.absolutely_continuous Eq.absolutelyContinuous
namespace AbsolutelyContinuous
theorem mk (h : ∀ ⦃s : Set α⦄, MeasurableSet s → ν s = 0 → μ s = 0) : μ ≪ ν := by
intro s hs
rcases exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs with ⟨t, h1t, h2t, h3t⟩
exact measure_mono_null h1t (h h2t h3t)
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.mk MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.mk
@[refl]
protected theorem refl {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ ≪ μ :=
rfl.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.refl MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.refl
protected theorem rfl : μ ≪ μ := fun _s hs => hs
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.rfl MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
instance instIsRefl [MeasurableSpace α] : IsRefl (Measure α) (· ≪ ·) :=
⟨fun _ => AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.is_refl MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.instIsRefl
@[simp]
protected lemma zero (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≪ μ := fun s _ ↦ by simp
@[trans]
protected theorem trans (h1 : μ₁ ≪ μ₂) (h2 : μ₂ ≪ μ₃) : μ₁ ≪ μ₃ := fun _s hs => h1 <| h2 hs
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.trans MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.trans
@[mono]
protected theorem map (h : μ ≪ ν) {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) : μ.map f ≪ ν.map f :=
AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => by simpa [hf, hs] using @h _
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.map MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.map
protected theorem smul [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : μ ≪ ν) (c : R) : c • μ ≪ ν := fun s hνs => by
simp only [h hνs, smul_eq_mul, smul_apply, smul_zero]
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.smul MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.smul
protected lemma add (h1 : μ₁ ≪ ν) (h2 : μ₂ ≪ ν') : μ₁ + μ₂ ≪ ν + ν' := by
intro s hs
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_eq_zero] at hs ⊢
exact ⟨h1 hs.1, h2 hs.2⟩
lemma add_left_iff {μ₁ μ₂ ν : Measure α} :
μ₁ + μ₂ ≪ ν ↔ μ₁ ≪ ν ∧ μ₂ ≪ ν := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ (h.1.add h.2).trans ?_⟩
· have : ∀ s, ν s = 0 → μ₁ s = 0 ∧ μ₂ s = 0 := by intro s hs0; simpa using h hs0
exact ⟨fun s hs0 ↦ (this s hs0).1, fun s hs0 ↦ (this s hs0).2⟩
· have : ν + ν = 2 • ν := by ext; simp [two_mul]
rw [this]
exact AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl.smul 2
lemma add_right (h1 : μ ≪ ν) (ν' : Measure α) : μ ≪ ν + ν' := by
intro s hs
simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_eq_zero] at hs ⊢
exact h1 hs.1
end AbsolutelyContinuous
@[simp]
lemma absolutelyContinuous_zero_iff : μ ≪ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ measure_univ_eq_zero.mp (h rfl), fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ AbsolutelyContinuous.zero _⟩
alias absolutelyContinuous_refl := AbsolutelyContinuous.refl
alias absolutelyContinuous_rfl := AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl
lemma absolutelyContinuous_sum_left {μs : ι → Measure α} (hμs : ∀ i, μs i ≪ ν) :
Measure.sum μs ≪ ν :=
AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs hs0 ↦ by simp [sum_apply _ hs, fun i ↦ hμs i hs0]
lemma absolutelyContinuous_sum_right {μs : ι → Measure α} (i : ι) (hνμ : ν ≪ μs i) :
ν ≪ Measure.sum μs := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs hs0 ↦ ?_
simp only [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hs0
exact hνμ (hs0 i)
theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ) :
μ' ≪ μ :=
(Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le hμ'_le).trans (Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl.smul c)
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous_of_le_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul
lemma smul_absolutelyContinuous {c : ℝ≥0∞} : c • μ ≪ μ := absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul le_rfl
lemma absolutelyContinuous_smul {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : μ ≪ c • μ := by
simp [AbsolutelyContinuous, hc]
theorem ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous : ae μ ≤ ae ν ↔ μ ≪ ν :=
⟨fun h s => by
rw [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem, measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem]
exact fun hs => h hs, fun h s hs => h hs⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_le_iff_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.absolutelyContinuous_of_ae, AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_le⟩ :=
ae_le_iff_absolutelyContinuous
#align has_le.le.absolutely_continuous_of_ae LE.le.absolutelyContinuous_of_ae
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.ae_le MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_le
alias ae_mono' := AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_le
#align measure_theory.measure.ae_mono' MeasureTheory.Measure.ae_mono'
theorem AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_eq (h : μ ≪ ν) {f g : α → δ} (h' : f =ᵐ[ν] g) : f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.ae_le h'
#align measure_theory.measure.absolutely_continuous.ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.AbsolutelyContinuous.ae_eq
protected theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint.of_absolutelyContinuous
(h : AEDisjoint μ s t) {ν : Measure α} (h' : ν ≪ μ) :
AEDisjoint ν s t := h' h
protected theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint.of_le
(h : AEDisjoint μ s t) {ν : Measure α} (h' : ν ≤ μ) :
AEDisjoint ν s t :=
h.of_absolutelyContinuous (Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le h')
/-! ### Quasi measure preserving maps (a.k.a. non-singular maps) -/
/-- A map `f : α → β` is said to be *quasi measure preserving* (a.k.a. non-singular) w.r.t. measures
`μa` and `μb` if it is measurable and `μb s = 0` implies `μa (f ⁻¹' s) = 0`. -/
structure QuasiMeasurePreserving {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β)
(μa : Measure α := by volume_tac)
(μb : Measure β := by volume_tac) : Prop where
protected measurable : Measurable f
protected absolutelyContinuous : μa.map f ≪ μb
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.measurable
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.absolutelyContinuous
namespace QuasiMeasurePreserving
protected theorem id {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : QuasiMeasurePreserving id μ μ :=
⟨measurable_id, map_id.absolutelyContinuous⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.id MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.id
variable {μa μa' : Measure α} {μb μb' : Measure β} {μc : Measure γ} {f : α → β}
protected theorem _root_.Measurable.quasiMeasurePreserving
{_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : Measurable f) (μ : Measure α) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ (μ.map f) :=
⟨hf, AbsolutelyContinuous.rfl⟩
#align measurable.quasi_measure_preserving Measurable.quasiMeasurePreserving
theorem mono_left (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (ha : μa' ≪ μa) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa' μb :=
⟨h.1, (ha.map h.1).trans h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.mono_left MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.mono_left
theorem mono_right (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (ha : μb ≪ μb') :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb' :=
⟨h.1, h.2.trans ha⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.mono_right MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.mono_right
@[mono]
theorem mono (ha : μa' ≪ μa) (hb : μb ≪ μb') (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) :
QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa' μb' :=
(h.mono_left ha).mono_right hb
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.mono MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.mono
protected theorem comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : QuasiMeasurePreserving g μb μc)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : QuasiMeasurePreserving (g ∘ f) μa μc :=
⟨hg.measurable.comp hf.measurable, by
rw [← map_map hg.1 hf.1]
exact (hf.2.map hg.1).trans hg.2⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.comp MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.comp
protected theorem iterate {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μa) :
∀ n, QuasiMeasurePreserving f^[n] μa μa
| 0 => QuasiMeasurePreserving.id μa
| n + 1 => (hf.iterate n).comp hf
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.iterate MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.iterate
protected theorem aemeasurable (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : AEMeasurable f μa :=
hf.1.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.aemeasurable
theorem ae_map_le (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : ae (μa.map f) ≤ ae μb :=
h.2.ae_le
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_map_le MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_map_le
theorem tendsto_ae (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) : Tendsto f (ae μa) (ae μb) :=
(tendsto_ae_map h.aemeasurable).mono_right h.ae_map_le
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.tendsto_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.tendsto_ae
theorem ae (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) {p : β → Prop} (hg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μb, p x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μa, p (f x) :=
h.tendsto_ae hg
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae
theorem ae_eq (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) {g₁ g₂ : β → δ} (hg : g₁ =ᵐ[μb] g₂) :
g₁ ∘ f =ᵐ[μa] g₂ ∘ f :=
h.ae hg
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.ae_eq
theorem preimage_null (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) {s : Set β} (hs : μb s = 0) :
μa (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 :=
preimage_null_of_map_null h.aemeasurable (h.2 hs)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_null MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_null
theorem preimage_mono_ae {s t : Set β} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (h : s ≤ᵐ[μb] t) :
f ⁻¹' s ≤ᵐ[μa] f ⁻¹' t :=
eventually_map.mp <|
Eventually.filter_mono (tendsto_ae_map hf.aemeasurable) (Eventually.filter_mono hf.ae_map_le h)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_mono_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_mono_ae
theorem preimage_ae_eq {s t : Set β} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μa μb) (h : s =ᵐ[μb] t) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μa] f ⁻¹' t :=
EventuallyLE.antisymm (hf.preimage_mono_ae h.le) (hf.preimage_mono_ae h.symm.le)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_ae_eq
theorem preimage_iterate_ae_eq {s : Set α} {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ) (k : ℕ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) : f^[k] ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
induction' k with k ih; · rfl
rw [iterate_succ, preimage_comp]
exact EventuallyEq.trans (hf.preimage_ae_eq ih) hs
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.preimage_iterate_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.preimage_iterate_ae_eq
theorem image_zpow_ae_eq {s : Set α} {e : α ≃ α} (he : QuasiMeasurePreserving e μ μ)
(he' : QuasiMeasurePreserving e.symm μ μ) (k : ℤ) (hs : e '' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
(⇑(e ^ k)) '' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage]
obtain ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩ := k.eq_nat_or_neg
· replace hs : (⇑e⁻¹) ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by rwa [Equiv.image_eq_preimage] at hs
replace he' : (⇑e⁻¹)^[k] ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := he'.preimage_iterate_ae_eq k hs
rwa [Equiv.Perm.iterate_eq_pow e⁻¹ k, inv_pow e k] at he'
· rw [zpow_neg, zpow_natCast]
replace hs : e ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
convert he.preimage_ae_eq hs.symm
rw [Equiv.preimage_image]
replace he : (⇑e)^[k] ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s := he.preimage_iterate_ae_eq k hs
rwa [Equiv.Perm.iterate_eq_pow e k] at he
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.image_zpow_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.image_zpow_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) : limsup (α := Set α) (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) atTop =ᵐ[μ] s :=
haveI : ∀ n, (preimage f)^[n] s =ᵐ[μ] s := by
intro n
induction' n with n ih
· rfl
simpa only [iterate_succ', comp_apply] using ae_eq_trans (hf.ae_eq ih) hs
(limsup_ae_eq_of_forall_ae_eq (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) this).trans (ae_eq_refl _)
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq
-- Need to specify `α := Set α` below because of diamond; see #19041
theorem liminf_preimage_iterate_ae_eq {f : α → α} (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ)
(hs : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) : liminf (α := Set α) (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) atTop =ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [← ae_eq_set_compl_compl, @Filter.liminf_compl (Set α)]
rw [← ae_eq_set_compl_compl, ← preimage_compl] at hs
convert hf.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq hs
ext1 n
simp only [← Set.preimage_iterate_eq, comp_apply, preimage_compl]
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.liminf_preimage_iterate_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.liminf_preimage_iterate_ae_eq
/-- By replacing a measurable set that is almost invariant with the `limsup` of its preimages, we
obtain a measurable set that is almost equal and strictly invariant.
(The `liminf` would work just as well.) -/
theorem exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae {f : α → α} (h : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ μ)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hs' : f ⁻¹' s =ᵐ[μ] s) :
∃ t : Set α, MeasurableSet t ∧ t =ᵐ[μ] s ∧ f ⁻¹' t = t :=
⟨limsup (fun n => (preimage f)^[n] s) atTop,
MeasurableSet.measurableSet_limsup fun n =>
preimage_iterate_eq ▸ h.measurable.iterate n hs,
h.limsup_preimage_iterate_ae_eq hs',
Filter.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (CompleteLatticeHom.setPreimage f) s⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.exists_preimage_eq_of_preimage_ae
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_ae_eq_of_ae_eq {G α : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α] [MeasurableSpace α]
{s t : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (g : G)
(h_qmp : QuasiMeasurePreserving (g⁻¹ • · : α → α) μ μ)
(h_ae_eq : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : (g • s : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (g • t : Set α) := by
simpa only [← preimage_smul_inv] using h_qmp.ae_eq h_ae_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.smul_ae_eq_of_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.smul_ae_eq_of_ae_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.quasi_measure_preserving.vadd_ae_eq_of_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.QuasiMeasurePreserving.vadd_ae_eq_of_ae_eq
end QuasiMeasurePreserving
section Pointwise
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_one {G α : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
[MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} {s : Set α}
(h_ae_disjoint : ∀ g ≠ (1 : G), AEDisjoint μ (g • s) s)
(h_qmp : ∀ g : G, QuasiMeasurePreserving (g • ·) μ μ) :
Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on fun g : G => g • s) := by
intro g₁ g₂ hg
let g := g₂⁻¹ * g₁
replace hg : g ≠ 1 := by
rw [Ne, inv_mul_eq_one]
exact hg.symm
have : (g₂⁻¹ • ·) ⁻¹' (g • s ∩ s) = g₁ • s ∩ g₂ • s := by
rw [preimage_eq_iff_eq_image (MulAction.bijective g₂⁻¹), image_smul, smul_set_inter, smul_smul,
smul_smul, inv_mul_self, one_smul]
change μ (g₁ • s ∩ g₂ • s) = 0
exact this ▸ (h_qmp g₂⁻¹).preimage_null (h_ae_disjoint g hg)
#align measure_theory.measure.pairwise_ae_disjoint_of_ae_disjoint_forall_ne_one MeasureTheory.Measure.pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_one
#align measure_theory.measure.pairwise_ae_disjoint_of_ae_disjoint_forall_ne_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.pairwise_aedisjoint_of_aedisjoint_forall_ne_zero
end Pointwise
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun t ht s hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.cofinite
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.mem_cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.mem_cofinite
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
#align measure_theory.measure.compl_mem_cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.compl_mem_cofinite
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.eventually_cofinite MeasureTheory.Measure.eventually_cofinite
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
#align ae_measurable.null_measurable AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
/-- The preimage of a null measurable set under a (quasi) measure preserving map is a null
measurable set. -/
theorem NullMeasurableSet.preimage {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {t : Set β}
(ht : NullMeasurableSet t ν) (hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' t) μ :=
⟨f ⁻¹' toMeasurable ν t, hf.measurable (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
hf.ae_eq ht.toMeasurable_ae_eq.symm⟩
#align measure_theory.null_measurable_set.preimage MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.preimage
theorem NullMeasurableSet.mono_ac (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hle : ν ≪ μ) :
NullMeasurableSet s ν :=
h.preimage <| (QuasiMeasurePreserving.id μ).mono_left hle
#align measure_theory.null_measurable_set.mono_ac MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.mono_ac
theorem NullMeasurableSet.mono (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hle : ν ≤ μ) : NullMeasurableSet s ν :=
h.mono_ac hle.absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.null_measurable_set.mono MeasureTheory.NullMeasurableSet.mono
theorem AEDisjoint.preimage {ν : Measure β} {f : α → β} {s t : Set β} (ht : AEDisjoint ν s t)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) : AEDisjoint μ (f ⁻¹' s) (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf.preimage_null ht
#align measure_theory.ae_disjoint.preimage MeasureTheory.AEDisjoint.preimage
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,986 | 1,987 | theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by |
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
/-- `ofDigits b L` takes a list `L` of natural numbers, and interprets them
as a number in semiring, as the little-endian digits in base `b`.
-/
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_singleton Nat.ofDigits_singleton
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_one_cons Nat.ofDigits_one_cons
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
#align nat.of_digits_append Nat.ofDigits_append
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
#align nat.coe_of_digits Nat.coe_ofDigits
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
#align nat.coe_int_of_digits Nat.coe_int_ofDigits
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
#align nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero Nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
#align nat.digits_of_digits Nat.digits_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
cases' b with b
· cases' n with n
· rfl
· change ofDigits 0 [n + 1] = n + 1
dsimp [ofDigits]
· cases' b with b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· apply Nat.strongInductionOn n _
clear n
intro n h
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
#align nat.of_digits_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits
theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
#align nat.of_digits_one Nat.ofDigits_one
/-!
### Properties
This section contains various lemmas of properties relating to `digits` and `ofDigits`.
-/
theorem digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
have : ofDigits b (digits b n) = ofDigits b [] := by rw [h]
convert this
rw [ofDigits_digits]
· rintro rfl
simp
#align nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero Nat.digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
theorem digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero {b n : ℕ} : digits b n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
not_congr digits_eq_nil_iff_eq_zero
#align nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero Nat.digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero
theorem digits_eq_cons_digits_div {b n : ℕ} (h : 1 < b) (w : n ≠ 0) :
digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b) := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· rw [digits_zero_succ' w, Nat.mod_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.digits_zero_zero]
· norm_num at h
rcases n with (_ | n)
· norm_num at w
· simp only [digits_add_two_add_one, ne_eq]
#align nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div Nat.digits_eq_cons_digits_div
theorem digits_getLast {b : ℕ} (m : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (p q) :
(digits b m).getLast p = (digits b (m / b)).getLast q := by
by_cases hm : m = 0
· simp [hm]
simp only [digits_eq_cons_digits_div h hm]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
#align nat.digits_last Nat.digits_getLast
theorem digits.injective (b : ℕ) : Function.Injective b.digits :=
Function.LeftInverse.injective (ofDigits_digits b)
#align nat.digits.injective Nat.digits.injective
@[simp]
theorem digits_inj_iff {b n m : ℕ} : b.digits n = b.digits m ↔ n = m :=
(digits.injective b).eq_iff
#align nat.digits_inj_iff Nat.digits_inj_iff
theorem digits_len (b n : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (b.digits n).length = b.log n + 1 := by
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n IH
rw [digits_eq_cons_digits_div hb hn, List.length]
by_cases h : n / b = 0
· have hb0 : b ≠ 0 := (Nat.succ_le_iff.1 hb).ne_bot
simp [h, log_eq_zero_iff, ← Nat.div_eq_zero_iff hb0.bot_lt]
· have : n / b < n := div_lt_self (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) hb
rw [IH _ this h, log_div_base, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
refine Nat.succ_le_of_lt (log_pos hb ?_)
contrapose! h
exact div_eq_of_lt h
#align nat.digits_len Nat.digits_len
theorem getLast_digit_ne_zero (b : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(digits b m).getLast (digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm) ≠ 0 := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b)
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
· simp
· cases m
· cases hm rfl
rename ℕ => m
simp only [zero_add, digits_one, List.getLast_replicate_succ m 1]
exact Nat.one_ne_zero
revert hm
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH hn
by_cases hnb : n < b + 2
· simpa only [digits_of_lt (b + 2) n hn hnb]
· rw [digits_getLast n (le_add_left 2 b)]
refine IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self hn.bot_lt (one_lt_succ_succ b)) ?_
rw [← pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact Nat.div_pos (le_of_not_lt hnb) (zero_lt_succ (succ b))
#align nat.last_digit_ne_zero Nat.getLast_digit_ne_zero
theorem mul_ofDigits (n : ℕ) {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
n * ofDigits b l = ofDigits b (l.map (n * ·)) := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons hd tl ih =>
rw [List.map_cons, ofDigits_cons, ofDigits_cons, ← ih]
ring
/-- The addition of ofDigits of two lists is equal to ofDigits of digit-wise addition of them-/
theorem ofDigits_add_ofDigits_eq_ofDigits_zipWith_of_length_eq {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ}
(h : l1.length = l2.length) :
ofDigits b l1 + ofDigits b l2 = ofDigits b (l1.zipWith (· + ·) l2) := by
induction l1 generalizing l2 with
| nil => simp_all [eq_comm, List.length_eq_zero, ofDigits]
| cons hd₁ tl₁ ih₁ =>
induction l2 generalizing tl₁ with
| nil => simp_all
| cons hd₂ tl₂ ih₂ =>
simp_all only [List.length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, ofDigits_cons, add_left_inj,
eq_comm, List.zipWith_cons_cons, add_eq]
rw [← ih₁ h.symm, mul_add]
ac_rfl
/-- The digits in the base b+2 expansion of n are all less than b+2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base' {b m : ℕ} : ∀ {d}, d ∈ digits (b + 2) m → d < b + 2 := by
apply Nat.strongInductionOn m
intro n IH d hd
cases' n with n
· rw [digits_zero] at hd
cases hd
-- base b+2 expansion of 0 has no digits
rw [digits_add_two_add_one] at hd
cases hd
· exact n.succ.mod_lt (by simp)
-- Porting note: Previous code (single line) contained linarith.
-- . exact IH _ (Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) (by linarith)) hd
· apply IH ((n + 1) / (b + 2))
· apply Nat.div_lt_self <;> omega
· assumption
#align nat.digits_lt_base' Nat.digits_lt_base'
/-- The digits in the base b expansion of n are all less than b, if b ≥ 2 -/
theorem digits_lt_base {b m d : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hd : d ∈ digits b m) : d < b := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact digits_lt_base' hd
#align nat.digits_lt_base Nat.digits_lt_base
/-- an n-digit number in base b + 2 is less than (b + 2)^n -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b + 2) :
ofDigits (b + 2) l < (b + 2) ^ l.length := by
induction' l with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.length_cons, pow_succ]
have : (ofDigits (b + 2) tl + 1) * (b + 2) ≤ (b + 2) ^ tl.length * (b + 2) :=
mul_le_mul (IH fun x hx => hl _ (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hx)) (by rfl) (by simp only [zero_le])
(Nat.zero_le _)
suffices ↑hd < b + 2 by linarith
exact hl hd (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length' Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length'
/-- an n-digit number in base b is less than b^n if b > 1 -/
theorem ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, x < b) :
ofDigits b l < b ^ l.length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' hl
#align nat.of_digits_lt_base_pow_length Nat.ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length
/-- Any number m is less than (b+2)^(number of digits in the base b + 2 representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits' {b m : ℕ} : m < (b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length := by
convert @ofDigits_lt_base_pow_length' b (digits (b + 2) m) fun _ => digits_lt_base'
rw [ofDigits_digits (b + 2) m]
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits' Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits'
/-- Any number m is less than b^(number of digits in the base b representation of m) -/
theorem lt_base_pow_length_digits {b m : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : m < b ^ (digits b m).length := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact lt_base_pow_length_digits'
#align nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits Nat.lt_base_pow_length_digits
theorem ofDigits_digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} :
ofDigits b (digits b n ++ digits b m) = n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m := by
rw [ofDigits_append, ofDigits_digits, ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.of_digits_digits_append_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits_append_digits
theorem digits_append_digits {b m n : ℕ} (hb : 0 < b) :
digits b n ++ digits b m = digits b (n + b ^ (digits b n).length * m) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hb) with (rfl | hb)
· simp [List.replicate_add]
rw [← ofDigits_digits_append_digits]
refine (digits_ofDigits b hb _ (fun l hl => ?_) (fun h_append => ?_)).symm
· rcases (List.mem_append.mp hl) with (h | h) <;> exact digits_lt_base hb h
· by_cases h : digits b m = []
· simp only [h, List.append_nil] at h_append ⊢
exact getLast_digit_ne_zero b <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h_append
· exact (List.getLast_append' _ _ h) ▸
(getLast_digit_ne_zero _ <| digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mp h)
theorem digits_len_le_digits_len_succ (b n : ℕ) :
(digits b n).length ≤ (digits b (n + 1)).length := by
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· interval_cases b <;> simp_arith [digits_zero_succ', hn]
simpa [digits_len, hb, hn] using log_mono_right (le_succ _)
#align nat.digits_len_le_digits_len_succ Nat.digits_len_le_digits_len_succ
theorem le_digits_len_le (b n m : ℕ) (h : n ≤ m) : (digits b n).length ≤ (digits b m).length :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ (digits_len_le_digits_len_succ b) h
#align nat.le_digits_len_le Nat.le_digits_len_le
@[mono]
theorem ofDigits_monotone {p q : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : p ≤ q) : ofDigits p L ≤ ofDigits q L := by
induction' L with _ _ hi
· rfl
· simp only [ofDigits, cast_id, add_le_add_iff_left]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul h hi
theorem sum_le_ofDigits {p : ℕ} (L : List ℕ) (h : 1 ≤ p) : L.sum ≤ ofDigits p L :=
(ofDigits_one L).symm ▸ ofDigits_monotone L h
theorem digit_sum_le (p n : ℕ) : List.sum (digits p n) ≤ n := by
induction' n with n
· exact digits_zero _ ▸ Nat.le_refl (List.sum [])
· induction' p with p
· rw [digits_zero_succ, List.sum_cons, List.sum_nil, add_zero]
· nth_rw 2 [← ofDigits_digits p.succ (n + 1)]
rw [← ofDigits_one <| digits p.succ n.succ]
exact ofDigits_monotone (digits p.succ n.succ) <| Nat.succ_pos p
theorem pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits {b : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} (hl : l ≠ []) (hl2 : l.getLast hl ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ l.length ≤ (b + 2) * ofDigits (b + 2) l := by
rw [← List.dropLast_append_getLast hl]
simp only [List.length_append, List.length, zero_add, List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_append,
List.length_dropLast, ofDigits_singleton, add_comm (l.length - 1), pow_add, pow_one]
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
have : 0 < l.getLast hl := by rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero]
convert Nat.mul_le_mul_left ((b + 2) ^ (l.length - 1)) this using 1
rw [Nat.mul_one]
#align nat.pow_length_le_mul_of_digits Nat.pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
(b+2)^((number of digits in the base (b+2) representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le' (b m : ℕ) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(b + 2) ^ (digits (b + 2) m).length ≤ (b + 2) * m := by
have : digits (b + 2) m ≠ [] := digits_ne_nil_iff_ne_zero.mpr hm
convert @pow_length_le_mul_ofDigits b (digits (b+2) m)
this (getLast_digit_ne_zero _ hm)
rw [ofDigits_digits]
#align nat.base_pow_length_digits_le' Nat.base_pow_length_digits_le'
/-- Any non-zero natural number `m` is greater than
b^((number of digits in the base b representation of m) - 1)
-/
theorem base_pow_length_digits_le (b m : ℕ) (hb : 1 < b) :
m ≠ 0 → b ^ (digits b m).length ≤ b * m := by
rcases b with (_ | _ | b) <;> try simp_all
exact base_pow_length_digits_le' b m
#align nat.base_pow_length_digits_le Nat.base_pow_length_digits_le
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p` is the same as interpreting the tail.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail {p : ℕ} (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ)
(w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) : ofDigits p digits / p = ofDigits p digits.tail := by
induction' digits with hd tl
· simp [ofDigits]
· refine Eq.trans (add_mul_div_left hd _ hpos) ?_
rw [Nat.div_eq_of_lt <| w₁ _ <| List.mem_cons_self _ _, zero_add]
rfl
/-- Interpreting as a base `p` number and dividing by `p^i` is the same as dropping `i`.
-/
lemma ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop
{p : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hpos : 0 < p) (digits : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ digits, l < p) :
ofDigits p digits / p ^ i = ofDigits p (digits.drop i) := by
induction' i with i hi
· simp
· rw [Nat.pow_succ, ← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, hi, ofDigits_div_eq_ofDigits_tail hpos
(List.drop i digits) fun x hx ↦ w₁ x <| List.mem_of_mem_drop hx, ← List.drop_one,
List.drop_drop, add_comm]
/-- Dividing `n` by `p^i` is like truncating the first `i` digits of `n` in base `p`.
-/
lemma self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop {p : ℕ} (i n : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ p):
n / p ^ i = ofDigits p ((p.digits n).drop i) := by
convert ofDigits_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop i (zero_lt_of_lt h) (p.digits n)
(fun l hl ↦ digits_lt_base h hl)
exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
open Finset
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ}
(L : List ℕ) {h_nonempty} (h_ne_zero : L.getLast h_nonempty ≠ 0) (h_lt : ∀ l ∈ L, l < p) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range L.length, (ofDigits p L) / p ^ i.succ = (ofDigits p L) - L.sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· induction' L with hd tl ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· simp only [List.length_cons, List.sum_cons, self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h,
digits_ofDigits p h (hd :: tl) h_lt (fun _ => h_ne_zero)]
simp only [ofDigits]
rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.cast_id]
simp only [List.drop, List.drop_length]
obtain rfl | h' := em <| tl = []
· simp [ofDigits]
· have w₁' := fun l hl ↦ h_lt l <| List.mem_cons_of_mem hd hl
have w₂' := fun (h : tl ≠ []) ↦ (List.getLast_cons h) ▸ h_ne_zero
have ih := ih (w₂' h') w₁'
simp only [self_div_pow_eq_ofDigits_drop _ _ h, digits_ofDigits p h tl w₁' w₂',
← Nat.one_add] at ih
have := sum_singleton (fun x ↦ ofDigits p <| tl.drop x) tl.length
rw [← Ico_succ_singleton, List.drop_length, ofDigits] at this
have h₁ : 1 ≤ tl.length := List.length_pos.mpr h'
rw [← sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ <| h₁, ← add_zero (∑ x ∈ Ico _ _, ofDigits p (tl.drop x)),
← this, sum_Ico_consecutive _ h₁ <| (le_add_right tl.length 1),
← sum_Ico_add _ 0 tl.length 1,
Ico_zero_eq_range, mul_add, mul_add, ih, range_one, sum_singleton, List.drop, ofDigits,
mul_zero, add_zero, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc <| sum_le_ofDigits _ <| Nat.le_of_lt h]
nth_rw 2 [← one_mul <| ofDigits p tl]
rw [← add_mul, one_eq_succ_zero, Nat.sub_add_cancel <| zero_lt_of_lt h,
Nat.add_sub_add_left]
· simp [ofDigits_one]
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases L
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits]
theorem sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) :
(p - 1) * ∑ i ∈ range (log p n).succ, n / p ^ i.succ = n - (p.digits n).sum := by
obtain h | rfl | h : 1 < p ∨ 1 = p ∨ p < 1 := trichotomous 1 p
· rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with rfl | hn
· simp
· convert sub_one_mul_sum_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits (p.digits n) (getLast_digit_ne_zero p hn) <|
(fun l a ↦ digits_lt_base h a)
· refine (digits_len p n h hn).symm
all_goals exact (ofDigits_digits p n).symm
· simp
· simp [lt_one_iff.mp h]
cases n
all_goals simp
/-! ### Binary -/
theorem digits_two_eq_bits (n : ℕ) : digits 2 n = n.bits.map fun b => cond b 1 0 := by
induction' n using Nat.binaryRecFromOne with b n h ih
· simp
· rfl
rw [bits_append_bit _ _ fun hn => absurd hn h]
cases b
· rw [digits_def' one_lt_two]
· simpa [Nat.bit, Nat.bit0_val n]
· simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero, Nat.bit0_eq_zero]
· simpa [Nat.bit, Nat.bit1_val n, add_comm, digits_add 2 one_lt_two 1 n, Nat.add_mul_div_left]
#align nat.digits_two_eq_bits Nat.digits_two_eq_bits
/-! ### Modular Arithmetic -/
-- This is really a theorem about polynomials.
theorem dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits {α : Type*} [CommRing α] {a b k : α} (h : k ∣ a - b)
(L : List ℕ) : k ∣ ofDigits a L - ofDigits b L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· change k ∣ 0 - 0
simp
· simp only [ofDigits, add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
exact dvd_mul_sub_mul h ih
#align nat.dvd_of_digits_sub_of_digits Nat.dvd_ofDigits_sub_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_modEq' (b b' : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (h : b ≡ b' [MOD k]) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits b' L [MOD k] := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
dsimp [Nat.ModEq] at *
conv_lhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod, h, ih]
conv_rhs => rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod]
#align nat.of_digits_modeq' Nat.ofDigits_modEq'
theorem ofDigits_modEq (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L ≡ ofDigits (b % k) L [MOD k] :=
ofDigits_modEq' b (b % k) k (b.mod_modEq k).symm L
#align nat.of_digits_modeq Nat.ofDigits_modEq
theorem ofDigits_mod (b k : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits b L % k = ofDigits (b % k) L % k :=
ofDigits_modEq b k L
#align nat.of_digits_mod Nat.ofDigits_mod
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 666 | 667 | theorem ofDigits_mod_eq_head! (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) : ofDigits b l % b = l.head! % b := by |
induction l <;> simp [Nat.ofDigits, Int.ModEq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
/-!
# The set lattice
This file provides usual set notation for unions and intersections, a `CompleteLattice` instance
for `Set α`, and some more set constructions.
## Main declarations
* `Set.iUnion`: **i**ndexed **union**. Union of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.iInter`: **i**ndexed **inter**section. Intersection of an indexed family of sets.
* `Set.sInter`: **s**et **inter**section. Intersection of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sUnion`: **s**et **union**. Union of sets belonging to a set of sets.
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.BooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.kernImage`: For a function `f : α → β`, `s.kernImage f` is the set of `y` such that
`f ⁻¹ y ⊆ s`.
* `Set.seq`: Union of the image of a set under a **seq**uence of functions. `seq s t` is the union
of `f '' t` over all `f ∈ s`, where `t : Set α` and `s : Set (α → β)`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
section GaloisConnection
variable {f : α → β}
protected theorem image_preimage : GaloisConnection (image f) (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
image_subset_iff
#align set.image_preimage Set.image_preimage
protected theorem preimage_kernImage : GaloisConnection (preimage f) (kernImage f) := fun _ _ =>
subset_kernImage_iff.symm
#align set.preimage_kern_image Set.preimage_kernImage
end GaloisConnection
section kernImage
variable {f : α → β}
lemma kernImage_mono : Monotone (kernImage f) :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.monotone_u
lemma kernImage_eq_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f s = (f '' sᶜ)ᶜ :=
Set.preimage_kernImage.u_unique (Set.image_preimage.compl)
(fun t ↦ compl_compl (f ⁻¹' t) ▸ Set.preimage_compl)
lemma kernImage_compl {s : Set α} : kernImage f (sᶜ) = (f '' s)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_empty : kernImage f ∅ = (range f)ᶜ := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, compl_empty, image_univ]
lemma kernImage_preimage_eq_iff {s : Set β} : kernImage f (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ (range f)ᶜ ⊆ s := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, ← preimage_compl, compl_eq_comm, eq_comm, image_preimage_eq_iff,
compl_subset_comm]
lemma compl_range_subset_kernImage {s : Set α} : (range f)ᶜ ⊆ kernImage f s := by
rw [← kernImage_empty]
exact kernImage_mono (empty_subset _)
lemma kernImage_union_preimage {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) = kernImage f s ∪ t := by
rw [kernImage_eq_compl, kernImage_eq_compl, compl_union, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage,
compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma kernImage_preimage_union {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
kernImage f (f ⁻¹' t ∪ s) = t ∪ kernImage f s := by
rw [union_comm, kernImage_union_preimage, union_comm]
end kernImage
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' j') -/
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
#align set.Union_const Set.iUnion_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
#align set.Inter_const Set.iInter_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
#align set.Union_eq_const Set.iUnion_eq_const
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
#align set.Inter_eq_const Set.iInter_eq_const
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (hp hq) -/
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i i') -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i' i) -/
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) -/
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x h) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a subset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
/-- `sUnion` is monotone under taking a superset of each set. -/
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois connection. -/
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
/-- `⋃₀` and `𝒫` form a Galois insertion. -/
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
/-- If all sets in a collection are either `∅` or `Set.univ`, then so is their union. -/
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Function
/-! ### Lemmas about `Set.MapsTo`
Porting note: some lemmas in this section were upgraded from implications to `iff`s.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, MapsTo f s t :=
sUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_sUnion Set.mapsTo_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) t :=
iUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) t :=
iUnion₂_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂
theorem mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iUnion.2 fun i ↦ (H i).mono_right (subset_iUnion t i)
#align set.maps_to_Union_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Union₂_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sInter {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, MapsTo f s t :=
forall₂_swap
#align set.maps_to_sInter Set.mapsTo_sInter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f s (t i) :=
mapsTo_sInter.trans forall_mem_range
#align set.maps_to_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f s (t i j) := by
simp only [mapsTo_iInter]
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂
theorem mapsTo_iInter_iInter {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iInter.2 fun i => (H i).mono_left (iInter_subset s i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_iInter_iInter (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂
theorem image_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : (f '' ⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, f '' s i :=
(mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_image f (s i)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter_subset Set.image_iInter_subset
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (f : α → β) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j :=
(mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ fun i hi => mapsTo_image f (s i hi)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter₂_subset Set.image_iInter₂_subset
theorem image_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) : f '' ⋂₀ S ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, f '' s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
apply image_iInter₂_subset
#align set.image_sInter_subset Set.image_sInter_subset
/-! ### `restrictPreimage` -/
section
open Function
variable (s : Set β) {f : α → β} {U : ι → Set β} (hU : iUnion U = univ)
theorem injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Injective f ↔ ∀ i, Injective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_injective H, fun H x y e => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show f x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
injection @H i ⟨x, hi⟩ ⟨y, show f y ∈ U i from e ▸ hi⟩ (Subtype.ext e)
#align set.injective_iff_injective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Surjective f ↔ ∀ i, Surjective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_surjective H, fun H x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
exact ⟨_, congr_arg Subtype.val (H i ⟨x, hi⟩).choose_spec⟩
#align set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Bijective f ↔ ∀ i, Bijective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
rw [Bijective, injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU,
surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU]
simp [Bijective, forall_and]
#align set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
end
/-! ### `InjOn` -/
theorem InjOn.image_iInter_eq [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
inhabit ι
refine Subset.antisymm (image_iInter_subset s f) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_image] at hy
choose x hx hy using hy
refine ⟨x default, mem_iInter.2 fun i => ?_, hy _⟩
suffices x default = x i by
rw [this]
apply hx
replace hx : ∀ i, x i ∈ ⋃ j, s j := fun i => (subset_iUnion _ _) (hx i)
apply h (hx _) (hx _)
simp only [hy]
#align set.inj_on.image_Inter_eq Set.InjOn.image_iInter_eq
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i hi) -/
theorem InjOn.image_biInter_eq {p : ι → Prop} {s : ∀ i, p i → Set α} (hp : ∃ i, p i)
{f : α → β} (h : InjOn f (⋃ (i) (hi), s i hi)) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (hi), s i hi) = ⋂ (i) (hi), f '' s i hi := by
simp only [iInter, iInf_subtype']
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 hp
apply InjOn.image_iInter_eq
simpa only [iUnion, iSup_subtype'] using h
#align set.inj_on.image_bInter_eq Set.InjOn.image_biInter_eq
theorem image_iInter {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ι → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f '' s i := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp_rw [iInter_of_empty, image_univ_of_surjective hf.surjective]
· exact hf.injective.injOn.image_iInter_eq
#align set.image_Inter Set.image_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iInter₂ {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iInter hf]
#align set.image_Inter₂ Set.image_iInter₂
theorem inj_on_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, InjOn f (s i)) : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hx with ⟨i, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion.1 hy with ⟨j, hy⟩
rcases hs i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩
exact hf k (hi hx) (hj hy) hxy
#align set.inj_on_Union_of_directed Set.inj_on_iUnion_of_directed
/-! ### `SurjOn` -/
theorem surjOn_sUnion {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ t ∈ T, SurjOn f s t) :
SurjOn f s (⋃₀T) := fun _ ⟨t, ht, hx⟩ => H t ht hx
#align set.surj_on_sUnion Set.surjOn_sUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, SurjOn f s (t i)) :
SurjOn f s (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 H
#align set.surj_on_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion
theorem surjOn_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) : SurjOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => (H i).mono (subset_iUnion _ _) (Subset.refl _)
#align set.surj_on_Union_Union Set.surjOn_iUnion_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f s (t i j)) : SurjOn f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, SurjOn f (s i j) (t i j)) : SurjOn f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => surjOn_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.surj_on_Union₂_Union₂ Set.surjOn_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
theorem surjOn_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) t) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) t := by
intro y hy
rw [Hinj.image_iInter_eq, mem_iInter]
exact fun i => H i hy
#align set.surj_on_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter
theorem surjOn_iInter_iInter [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, SurjOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : SurjOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
surjOn_iInter (fun i => (H i).mono (Subset.refl _) (iInter_subset _ _)) Hinj
#align set.surj_on_Inter_Inter Set.surjOn_iInter_iInter
/-! ### `BijOn` -/
theorem bijOn_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i))
(Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).mapsTo, Hinj, surjOn_iUnion_iUnion fun i => (H i).surjOn⟩
#align set.bij_on_Union Set.bijOn_iUnion
theorem bijOn_iInter [hi : Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) (Hinj : InjOn f (⋃ i, s i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
⟨mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => (H i).mapsTo,
hi.elim fun i => (H i).injOn.mono (iInter_subset _ _),
surjOn_iInter_iInter (fun i => (H i).surjOn) Hinj⟩
#align set.bij_on_Inter Set.bijOn_iInter
theorem bijOn_iUnion_of_directed {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) {t : ι → Set β}
{f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iUnion H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Union_of_directed Set.bijOn_iUnion_of_directed
theorem bijOn_iInter_of_directed [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
{t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} (H : ∀ i, BijOn f (s i) (t i)) : BijOn f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
bijOn_iInter H <| inj_on_iUnion_of_directed hs fun i => (H i).injOn
#align set.bij_on_Inter_of_directed Set.bijOn_iInter_of_directed
end Function
/-! ### `image`, `preimage` -/
section Image
theorem image_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set α} : (f '' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f '' s i := by
ext1 x
simp only [mem_image, mem_iUnion, ← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left]
-- Porting note: `exists_swap` causes a `simp` loop in Lean4 so we use `rw` instead.
rw [exists_swap]
#align set.image_Union Set.image_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image_iUnion₂ (f : α → β) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(f '' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f '' s i j := by simp_rw [image_iUnion]
#align set.image_Union₂ Set.image_iUnion₂
theorem univ_subtype {p : α → Prop} : (univ : Set (Subtype p)) = ⋃ (x) (h : p x), {⟨x, h⟩} :=
Set.ext fun ⟨x, h⟩ => by simp [h]
#align set.univ_subtype Set.univ_subtype
theorem range_eq_iUnion {ι} (f : ι → α) : range f = ⋃ i, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [@eq_comm α a]
#align set.range_eq_Union Set.range_eq_iUnion
theorem image_eq_iUnion (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = ⋃ i ∈ s, {f i} :=
Set.ext fun b => by simp [@eq_comm β b]
#align set.image_eq_Union Set.image_eq_iUnion
theorem biUnion_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋃ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) :=
iSup_range
#align set.bUnion_range Set.biUnion_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋃ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋃ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biUnion_range
#align set.Union_Union_eq' Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq'
theorem biInter_range {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} : ⋂ x ∈ range f, g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) :=
iInf_range
#align set.bInter_range Set.biInter_range
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (x y) -/
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq' {f : ι → α} {g : α → Set β} :
⋂ (x) (y) (_ : f y = x), g x = ⋂ y, g (f y) := by simpa using biInter_range
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq' Set.iInter_iInter_eq'
variable {s : Set γ} {f : γ → α} {g : α → Set β}
theorem biUnion_image : ⋃ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋃ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iSup_image
#align set.bUnion_image Set.biUnion_image
theorem biInter_image : ⋂ x ∈ f '' s, g x = ⋂ y ∈ s, g (f y) :=
iInf_image
#align set.bInter_image Set.biInter_image
end Image
section Preimage
theorem monotone_preimage {f : α → β} : Monotone (preimage f) := fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h
#align set.monotone_preimage Set.monotone_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_iUnion {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, f ⁻¹' s i :=
Set.ext <| by simp [preimage]
#align set.preimage_Union Set.preimage_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iUnion₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iUnion]
#align set.preimage_Union₂ Set.preimage_iUnion₂
theorem image_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set α)} : (f '' ⋃₀ s) = ⋃₀ (image f '' s) := by
ext b
simp only [mem_image, mem_sUnion, exists_prop, sUnion_image, mem_iUnion]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ht₁, a, ht₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sUnion {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋃₀s = ⋃ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, preimage_iUnion₂]
#align set.preimage_sUnion Set.preimage_sUnion
theorem preimage_iInter {f : α → β} {s : ι → Set β} : (f ⁻¹' ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, f ⁻¹' s i := by
ext; simp
#align set.preimage_Inter Set.preimage_iInter
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem preimage_iInter₂ {f : α → β} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), f ⁻¹' s i j := by simp_rw [preimage_iInter]
#align set.preimage_Inter₂ Set.preimage_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sInter {f : α → β} {s : Set (Set β)} : f ⁻¹' ⋂₀ s = ⋂ t ∈ s, f ⁻¹' t := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, preimage_iInter₂]
#align set.preimage_sInter Set.preimage_sInter
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : ⋃ y ∈ s, f ⁻¹' {y} = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [← preimage_iUnion₂, biUnion_of_singleton]
#align set.bUnion_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton
theorem biUnion_range_preimage_singleton (f : α → β) : ⋃ y ∈ range f, f ⁻¹' {y} = univ := by
rw [biUnion_preimage_singleton, preimage_range]
#align set.bUnion_range_preimage_singleton Set.biUnion_range_preimage_singleton
end Preimage
section Prod
theorem prod_iUnion {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} : (s ×ˢ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.prod_Union Set.prod_iUnion
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem prod_iUnion₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} :
(s ×ˢ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ×ˢ t i j := by simp_rw [prod_iUnion]
#align set.prod_Union₂ Set.prod_iUnion₂
theorem prod_sUnion {s : Set α} {C : Set (Set β)} : s ×ˢ ⋃₀C = ⋃₀((fun t => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp_rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_image, prod_iUnion₂]
#align set.prod_sUnion Set.prod_sUnion
theorem iUnion_prod_const {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} : (⋃ i, s i) ×ˢ t = ⋃ i, s i ×ˢ t := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod_const Set.iUnion_prod_const
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem iUnion₂_prod_const {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ×ˢ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ×ˢ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_prod_const]
#align set.Union₂_prod_const Set.iUnion₂_prod_const
theorem sUnion_prod_const {C : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} :
⋃₀C ×ˢ t = ⋃₀((fun s : Set α => s ×ˢ t) '' C) := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, iUnion₂_prod_const, biUnion_image]
#align set.sUnion_prod_const Set.sUnion_prod_const
theorem iUnion_prod {ι ι' α β} (s : ι → Set α) (t : ι' → Set β) :
⋃ x : ι × ι', s x.1 ×ˢ t x.2 = (⋃ i : ι, s i) ×ˢ ⋃ i : ι', t i := by
ext
simp
#align set.Union_prod Set.iUnion_prod
/-- Analogue of `iSup_prod` for sets. -/
lemma iUnion_prod' (f : β × γ → Set α) : ⋃ x : β × γ, f x = ⋃ (i : β) (j : γ), f (i, j) :=
iSup_prod
theorem iUnion_prod_of_monotone [SemilatticeSup α] {s : α → Set β} {t : α → Set γ} (hs : Monotone s)
(ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ x, s x ×ˢ t x = (⋃ x, s x) ×ˢ ⋃ x, t x := by
ext ⟨z, w⟩; simp only [mem_prod, mem_iUnion, exists_imp, and_imp, iff_def]; constructor
· intro x hz hw
exact ⟨⟨x, hz⟩, x, hw⟩
· intro x hz x' hw
exact ⟨x ⊔ x', hs le_sup_left hz, ht le_sup_right hw⟩
#align set.Union_prod_of_monotone Set.iUnion_prod_of_monotone
theorem sInter_prod_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (T : Set (Set β)) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 :=
subset_iInter₂ fun x hx _ hy => ⟨hy.1 x.1 hx.1, hy.2 x.2 hx.2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset Set.sInter_prod_sInter_subset
theorem sInter_prod_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {T : Set (Set β)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (hT : T.Nonempty) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ r ∈ S ×ˢ T, r.1 ×ˢ r.2 := by
obtain ⟨s₁, h₁⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨s₂, h₂⟩ := hT
refine Set.Subset.antisymm (sInter_prod_sInter_subset S T) fun x hx => ?_
rw [mem_iInter₂] at hx
exact ⟨fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₀, s₂) ⟨h₀, h₂⟩).1, fun s₀ h₀ => (hx (s₁, s₀) ⟨h₁, h₀⟩).2⟩
#align set.sInter_prod_sInter Set.sInter_prod_sInter
theorem sInter_prod {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Nonempty) (t : Set β) :
⋂₀ S ×ˢ t = ⋂ s ∈ S, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton t, sInter_prod_sInter hS (singleton_nonempty t), sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [prod_singleton, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.sInter_prod Set.sInter_prod
theorem prod_sInter {T : Set (Set β)} (hT : T.Nonempty) (s : Set α) :
s ×ˢ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ t ∈ T, s ×ˢ t := by
rw [← sInter_singleton s, sInter_prod_sInter (singleton_nonempty s) hT, sInter_singleton]
simp_rw [singleton_prod, mem_image, iInter_exists, biInter_and', iInter_iInter_eq_right]
#align set.prod_sInter Set.prod_sInter
theorem prod_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} [hι : Nonempty ι] :
(s ×ˢ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ×ˢ t i := by
ext x
simp only [mem_prod, mem_iInter]
exact ⟨fun h i => ⟨h.1, h.2 i⟩, fun h => ⟨(h hι.some).1, fun i => (h i).2⟩⟩
#align prod_Inter Set.prod_iInter
end Prod
section Image2
variable (f : α → β → γ) {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
/-- The `Set.image2` version of `Set.image_eq_iUnion` -/
theorem image2_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image2 f s t = ⋃ (i ∈ s) (j ∈ t), {f i j} := by
ext; simp [eq_comm]
#align set.image2_eq_Union Set.image2_eq_iUnion
theorem iUnion_image_left : ⋃ a ∈ s, f a '' t = image2 f s t := by
simp only [image2_eq_iUnion, image_eq_iUnion]
#align set.Union_image_left Set.iUnion_image_left
theorem iUnion_image_right : ⋃ b ∈ t, (f · b) '' s = image2 f s t := by
rw [image2_swap, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.Union_image_right Set.iUnion_image_right
theorem image2_iUnion_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ i, s i) t = ⋃ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp only [← image_prod, iUnion_prod_const, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_left Set.image2_iUnion_left
theorem image2_iUnion_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp only [← image_prod, prod_iUnion, image_iUnion]
#align set.image2_Union_right Set.image2_iUnion_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by simp_rw [image2_iUnion_left]
#align set.image2_Union₂_left Set.image2_iUnion₂_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iUnion₂_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_iUnion_right]
#align set.image2_Union₂_right Set.image2_iUnion₂_right
theorem image2_iInter_subset_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ i, s i) t ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f (s i) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_left Set.image2_iInter_subset_left
theorem image2_iInter_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, image2 f s (t i) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _)
#align set.image2_Inter_subset_right Set.image2_iInter_subset_right
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_left (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
image2 f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f (s i j) t := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem (hx _ _) hy
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_left Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_left
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
/- ./././Mathport/Syntax/Translate/Expr.lean:107:6: warning: expanding binder group (i j) -/
theorem image2_iInter₂_subset_right (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
image2 f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), image2 f s (t i j) := by
simp_rw [image2_subset_iff, mem_iInter]
exact fun x hx y hy i j => mem_image2_of_mem hx (hy _ _)
#align set.image2_Inter₂_subset_right Set.image2_iInter₂_subset_right
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_left : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ a ∈ s, (fun b => (a, b)) '' t := by
rw [iUnion_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_left Set.prod_eq_biUnion_left
theorem prod_eq_biUnion_right : s ×ˢ t = ⋃ b ∈ t, (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
rw [iUnion_image_right, image2_mk_eq_prod]
#align set.prod_eq_bUnion_right Set.prod_eq_biUnion_right
end Image2
section Seq
theorem seq_def {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} : seq s t = ⋃ f ∈ s, f '' t := by
rw [seq_eq_image2, iUnion_image_left]
#align set.seq_def Set.seq_def
theorem seq_subset {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} {u : Set β} :
seq s t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, ∀ a ∈ t, (f : α → β) a ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.seq_subset Set.seq_subset
@[gcongr]
theorem seq_mono {s₀ s₁ : Set (α → β)} {t₀ t₁ : Set α} (hs : s₀ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₀ ⊆ t₁) :
seq s₀ t₀ ⊆ seq s₁ t₁ := image2_subset hs ht
#align set.seq_mono Set.seq_mono
theorem singleton_seq {f : α → β} {t : Set α} : Set.seq ({f} : Set (α → β)) t = f '' t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_seq Set.singleton_seq
theorem seq_singleton {s : Set (α → β)} {a : α} : Set.seq s {a} = (fun f : α → β => f a) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.seq_singleton Set.seq_singleton
theorem seq_seq {s : Set (β → γ)} {t : Set (α → β)} {u : Set α} :
seq s (seq t u) = seq (seq ((· ∘ ·) '' s) t) u := by
simp only [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left]
exact .symm <| image2_assoc fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl
#align set.seq_seq Set.seq_seq
theorem image_seq {f : β → γ} {s : Set (α → β)} {t : Set α} :
f '' seq s t = seq ((f ∘ ·) '' s) t := by
simp only [seq, image_image2, image2_image_left, comp_apply]
#align set.image_seq Set.image_seq
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,963 | 1,964 | theorem prod_eq_seq {s : Set α} {t : Set β} : s ×ˢ t = (Prod.mk '' s).seq t := by |
rw [seq_eq_image2, image2_image_left, image2_mk_eq_prod]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_analyticGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ analyticGroupoid I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I e.open_target) this
/-- The analytic groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (analyticGroupoid I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (analyticGroupoid I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I hs)
/-- The analytic groupoid on a boundaryless charted space modeled on a complete vector space
consists of the partial homeomorphisms which are analytic and have analytic inverse. -/
theorem mem_analyticGroupoid_of_boundaryless [CompleteSpace E] [I.Boundaryless]
(e : PartialHomeomorph H H) :
e ∈ analyticGroupoid I ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.source) ∧
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.target) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro he
have := mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mp he.right
simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ, interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true] at this ⊢
exact this
· intro he
apply And.intro
all_goals apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr; simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ,
interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true, contDiffPregroupoid] at he ⊢
· exact ⟨he.left.contDiffOn, he.right.contDiffOn⟩
· exact he
end analyticGroupoid
section SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/-! ### Smooth manifolds with corners -/
/-- Typeclass defining smooth manifolds with corners with respect to a model with corners, over a
field `𝕜` and with infinite smoothness to simplify typeclass search and statements later on. -/
class SmoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] extends
HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) : Prop
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[gr : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M :=
{ gr with }
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.mk' SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk'
theorem smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
(h : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M →
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (I ∘ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ range I)) :
SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M where
compatible := by
haveI : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) := hasGroupoid_of_pregroupoid _ (h _ _)
apply StructureGroupoid.compatible
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners_of_cont_diff_on smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn
/-- For any model with corners, the model space is a smooth manifold -/
instance model_space_smooth {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I H :=
{ hasGroupoid_model_space _ _ with }
#align model_space_smooth model_space_smooth
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/- We restate in the namespace `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` some lemmas that hold for general
charted space with a structure groupoid, avoiding the need to specify the groupoid
`contDiffGroupoid ∞ I` explicitly. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- The maximal atlas of `M` for the smooth manifold with corners structure corresponding to the
model with corners `I`. -/
def maximalAtlas :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).maximalAtlas M
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.maximalAtlas
variable {M}
theorem subset_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] : atlas H M ⊆ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.subset_maximalAtlas _
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.subset_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.subset_maximalAtlas
theorem chart_mem_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x : M) :
chartAt H x ∈ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.chart_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.chart_mem_maximalAtlas
variable {I}
theorem compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) : e.symm.trans e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- The product of two smooth manifolds with corners is naturally a smooth manifold with corners. -/
instance prod {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners (I.prod I') (M × M') where
compatible := by
rintro f g ⟨f1, hf1, f2, hf2, rfl⟩ ⟨g1, hg1, g2, hg2, rfl⟩
rw [PartialHomeomorph.prod_symm, PartialHomeomorph.prod_trans]
have h1 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).compatible hf1 hg1
have h2 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I').compatible hf2 hg2
exact contDiffGroupoid_prod h1 h2
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.prod SmoothManifoldWithCorners.prod
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) (h : e.source = Set.univ) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ (e.singletonChartedSpace h) :=
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (id _) <|
e.singleton_hasGroupoid h (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)
#align local_homeomorph.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [Nonempty M] {f : M → H}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ h.singletonChartedSpace :=
(h.toPartialHomeomorph f).singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners I (by simp)
#align open_embedding.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (s : Opens M)
instance : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I s :=
{ s.instHasGroupoid (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) with }
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
section ExtendedCharts
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 E M H E' M' H' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] (f f' : PartialHomeomorph M H)
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {s t : Set M}
/-!
### Extended charts
In a smooth manifold with corners, the model space is the space `H`. However, we will also
need to use extended charts taking values in the model vector space `E`. These extended charts are
not `PartialHomeomorph` as the target is not open in `E` in general, but we can still register them
as `PartialEquiv`.
-/
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/-- Given a chart `f` on a manifold with corners, `f.extend I` is the extended chart to the model
vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extend : PartialEquiv M E :=
f.toPartialEquiv ≫ I.toPartialEquiv
#align local_homeomorph.extend PartialHomeomorph.extend
theorem extend_coe : ⇑(f.extend I) = I ∘ f :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe
theorem extend_coe_symm : ⇑(f.extend I).symm = f.symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe_symm PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe_symm
theorem extend_source : (f.extend I).source = f.source := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.source_eq, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_source
theorem isOpen_extend_source : IsOpen (f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_source]
exact f.open_source
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_source PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_source
theorem extend_target : (f.extend I).target = I.symm ⁻¹' f.target ∩ range I := by
simp_rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm, inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target PartialHomeomorph.extend_target
theorem extend_target' : (f.extend I).target = I '' f.target := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target'', I.source_eq, univ_inter, I.toPartialEquiv_coe]
lemma isOpen_extend_target [I.Boundaryless] : IsOpen (f.extend I).target := by
rw [extend_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact I.continuous_symm.isOpen_preimage _ f.open_target
theorem mapsTo_extend (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
MapsTo (f.extend I) s ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [mapsTo', extend_coe, extend_coe_symm, preimage_comp, ← I.image_eq, image_comp,
f.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hs]
exact image_subset _ inter_subset_right
#align local_homeomorph.maps_to_extend PartialHomeomorph.mapsTo_extend
theorem extend_left_inv {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) = x :=
(f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_left_inv PartialHomeomorph.extend_left_inv
/-- Variant of `f.extend_left_inv I`, stated in terms of images. -/
lemma extend_left_inv' (ht: t ⊆ f.source) : ((f.extend I).symm ∘ (f.extend I)) '' t = t :=
EqOn.image_eq_self (fun _ hx ↦ f.extend_left_inv I (ht hx))
theorem extend_source_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(isOpen_extend_source f I).mem_nhds <| by rwa [f.extend_source I]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds
theorem extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extend : ContinuousOn (f.extend I) (f.extend I).source := by
refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn ?_
rw [extend_source]
exact f.continuousOn
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend
theorem continuousAt_extend {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : ContinuousAt (f.extend I) x :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).continuousAt <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend
theorem map_extend_nhds {x : M} (hy : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [extend_coe, comp_apply, ← I.map_nhds_eq, ← f.map_nhds_eq, map_map]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhds
theorem map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
rw [f.map_extend_nhds _ hx, I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
(f.extend I).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target, ← map_extend_nhds f I hy]
exact image_mem_map (extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 1,041 | 1,044 | theorem extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x} (hx : x ∈ f.source)
{s : Set M} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : (f.extend I) '' s ∈ 𝓝 ((f.extend I) x) := by |
rw [← f.map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless _ hx, Filter.mem_map]
filter_upwards [h] using subset_preimage_image (f.extend I) s
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.fractional_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ed90a7d327c3a5caf65a6faf7e8a0d63c4605df7"
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P] [loc : IsLocalization S P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [loc' : IsLocalization S P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P''] [loc'' : IsLocalization S P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, g.map_smul, hb']⟩
#align is_fractional.map IsFractional.map
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map FractionalIdeal.map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_map FractionalIdeal.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
#align fractional_ideal.mem_map FractionalIdeal.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
#align fractional_ideal.map_id FractionalIdeal.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
#align fractional_ideal.map_comp FractionalIdeal.map_comp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.map_coeIdeal
@[simp]
theorem map_one : (1 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 1 :=
map_coeIdeal g ⊤
#align fractional_ideal.map_one FractionalIdeal.map_one
@[simp]
theorem map_zero : (0 : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = 0 :=
map_coeIdeal g 0
#align fractional_ideal.map_zero FractionalIdeal.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_add : (I + J).map g = I.map g + J.map g :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_sup _ _ _)
#align fractional_ideal.map_add FractionalIdeal.map_add
@[simp]
theorem map_mul : (I * J).map g = I.map g * J.map g := by
simp only [mul_def]
exact coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_mul _ _ _)
#align fractional_ideal.map_mul FractionalIdeal.map_mul
@[simp]
theorem map_map_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : (I.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P')).map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P) = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.symm_comp, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_map_symm FractionalIdeal.map_map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_symm_map (I : FractionalIdeal S P') (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(I.map (g.symm : P' →ₐ[R] P)).map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') = I := by
rw [← map_comp, g.comp_symm, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_symm_map FractionalIdeal.map_symm_map
theorem map_mem_map {f : P →ₐ[R] P'} (h : Function.Injective f) {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
f x ∈ map f I ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_map.trans ⟨fun ⟨_, hx', x'_eq⟩ => h x'_eq ▸ hx', fun h => ⟨x, h, rfl⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_mem_map FractionalIdeal.map_mem_map
theorem map_injective (f : P →ₐ[R] P') (h : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') := fun _ _ hIJ =>
ext fun _ => (map_mem_map h).symm.trans (hIJ.symm ▸ map_mem_map h)
#align fractional_ideal.map_injective FractionalIdeal.map_injective
/-- If `g` is an equivalence, `map g` is an isomorphism -/
def mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' where
toFun := map g
invFun := map g.symm
map_add' I J := map_add I J _
map_mul' I J := map_mul I J _
left_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.symm_comp, map_id]
right_inv I := by rw [← map_comp, AlgEquiv.comp_symm, map_id]
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coeFun_mapEquiv (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
(mapEquiv g : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P') = map g :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_fun_map_equiv FractionalIdeal.coeFun_mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_apply (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) : mapEquiv g I = map (↑g) I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_apply FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm (g : P ≃ₐ[R] P') :
((mapEquiv g).symm : FractionalIdeal S P' ≃+* _) = mapEquiv g.symm :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_symm FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv AlgEquiv.refl = RingEquiv.refl (FractionalIdeal S P) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun x => by simp
#align fractional_ideal.map_equiv_refl FractionalIdeal.mapEquiv_refl
theorem isFractional_span_iff {s : Set P} :
IsFractional S (span R s) ↔ ∃ a ∈ S, ∀ b : P, b ∈ s → IsInteger R (a • b) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ => ⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb => h b (subset_span hb)⟩, fun ⟨a, a_mem, h⟩ =>
⟨a, a_mem, fun b hb =>
span_induction hb h
(by
rw [smul_zero]
exact isInteger_zero)
(fun x y hx hy => by
rw [smul_add]
exact isInteger_add hx hy)
fun s x hx => by
rw [smul_comm]
exact isInteger_smul hx⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_span_iff FractionalIdeal.isFractional_span_iff
theorem isFractional_of_fg {I : Submodule R P} (hI : I.FG) : IsFractional S I := by
rcases hI with ⟨I, rfl⟩
rcases exist_integer_multiples_of_finset S I with ⟨⟨s, hs1⟩, hs⟩
rw [isFractional_span_iff]
exact ⟨s, hs1, hs⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_of_fg FractionalIdeal.isFractional_of_fg
theorem mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul {I J : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P} (hx : x ∈ I * J) :
∃ T T' : Finset P, (T : Set P) ⊆ I ∧ (T' : Set P) ⊆ J ∧ x ∈ span R (T * T' : Set P) :=
Submodule.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul (by simpa using mem_coe.mpr hx)
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul FractionalIdeal.mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul
variable (S)
theorem coeIdeal_fg (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R) :
FG ((I : FractionalIdeal S P) : Submodule R P) ↔ I.FG :=
coeSubmodule_fg _ inj _
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_fg FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_fg
variable {S}
theorem fg_unit (I : (FractionalIdeal S P)ˣ) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
Submodule.fg_unit <| Units.map (coeSubmoduleHom S P).toMonoidHom I
#align fractional_ideal.fg_unit FractionalIdeal.fg_unit
theorem fg_of_isUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P) (h : IsUnit I) : FG (I : Submodule R P) :=
fg_unit h.unit
#align fractional_ideal.fg_of_is_unit FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit
theorem _root_.Ideal.fg_of_isUnit (inj : Function.Injective (algebraMap R P)) (I : Ideal R)
(h : IsUnit (I : FractionalIdeal S P)) : I.FG := by
rw [← coeIdeal_fg S inj I]
exact FractionalIdeal.fg_of_isUnit I h
#align ideal.fg_of_is_unit Ideal.fg_of_isUnit
variable (S P P')
/-- `canonicalEquiv f f'` is the canonical equivalence between the fractional
ideals in `P` and in `P'`, which are both localizations of `R` at `S`. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def canonicalEquiv : FractionalIdeal S P ≃+* FractionalIdeal S P' :=
mapEquiv
{ ringEquivOfRingEquiv P P' (RingEquiv.refl R)
(show S.map _ = S by rw [RingEquiv.toMonoidHom_refl, Submonoid.map_id]) with
commutes' := fun r => ringEquivOfRingEquiv_eq _ _ }
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mem_canonicalEquiv_apply {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {x : P'} :
x ∈ canonicalEquiv S P P' I ↔
∃ y ∈ I,
IsLocalization.map P' (RingHom.id R) (fun y (hy : y ∈ S) => show RingHom.id R y ∈ S from hy)
(y : P) =
x := by
rw [canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_apply, mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mem_canonical_equiv_apply FractionalIdeal.mem_canonicalEquiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_symm : (canonicalEquiv S P P').symm = canonicalEquiv S P' P :=
RingEquiv.ext fun I =>
SetLike.ext_iff.mpr fun x => by
rw [mem_canonicalEquiv_apply, canonicalEquiv, mapEquiv_symm, mapEquiv_apply,
mem_map]
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩, fun ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩ => ⟨y, mem, Eq⟩⟩
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_symm FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_symm
theorem canonicalEquiv_flip (I) : canonicalEquiv S P P' (canonicalEquiv S P' P I) = I := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_symm]; erw [RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_flip FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_flip
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
canonicalEquiv S P' P'' (canonicalEquiv S P P' I) = canonicalEquiv S P P'' I := by
ext
simp only [IsLocalization.map_map, RingHomInvPair.comp_eq₂, mem_canonicalEquiv_apply,
exists_prop, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv
theorem canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv (P'' : Type*) [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P'']
[IsLocalization S P''] :
(canonicalEquiv S P P').trans (canonicalEquiv S P' P'') = canonicalEquiv S P P'' :=
RingEquiv.ext (canonicalEquiv_canonicalEquiv S P P' P'')
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_trans_canonical_equiv FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : canonicalEquiv S P P' I = I := by
ext
simp [IsLocalization.map_eq]
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_coe_ideal FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_coeIdeal
@[simp]
theorem canonicalEquiv_self : canonicalEquiv S P P = RingEquiv.refl _ := by
rw [← canonicalEquiv_trans_canonicalEquiv S P P]
convert (canonicalEquiv S P P).symm_trans_self
exact (canonicalEquiv_symm S P P).symm
#align fractional_ideal.canonical_equiv_self FractionalIdeal.canonicalEquiv_self
end
section IsFractionRing
/-!
### `IsFractionRing` section
This section concerns fractional ideals in the field of fractions,
i.e. the type `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` where `IsFractionRing R K`.
-/
variable {K K' : Type*} [Field K] [Field K']
variable [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra R K'] [IsFractionRing R K']
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (h : K →ₐ[R] K')
/-- Nonzero fractional ideals contain a nonzero integer. -/
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∃ x, x ≠ 0 ∧ algebraMap R K x ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨y : K, y_mem, y_not_mem⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr hI)
have y_ne_zero : y ≠ 0 := by simpa using y_not_mem
obtain ⟨z, ⟨x, hx⟩⟩ := exists_integer_multiple R⁰ y
refine ⟨x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Ne, ← @IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff R _ K, hx, Algebra.smul_def]
exact mul_ne_zero (IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors z.2) y_ne_zero
· rw [hx]
exact smul_mem _ _ y_mem
#align fractional_ideal.exists_ne_zero_mem_is_integer FractionalIdeal.exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger
theorem map_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (hI : I ≠ 0) : I.map h ≠ 0 := by
obtain ⟨x, x_ne_zero, hx⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
contrapose! x_ne_zero with map_eq_zero
refine IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.mp (eq_zero_iff.mp map_eq_zero _ (mem_map.mpr ?_))
exact ⟨algebraMap R K x, hx, h.commutes x⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.map_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] : I.map h = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨not_imp_not.mp (map_ne_zero _), fun hI => hI.symm ▸ map_zero h⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map_eq_zero_iff FractionalIdeal.map_eq_zero_iff
theorem coeIdeal_injective : Function.Injective (fun (I : Ideal R) ↦ (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)) :=
coeIdeal_injective' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_injective FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_injective
theorem coeIdeal_inj {I J : Ideal R} :
(I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ↔ I = J :=
coeIdeal_inj' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_inj FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 ↔ I = ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_eq_zero' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_eq_zero FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_zero
theorem coeIdeal_ne_zero {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 ↔ I ≠ ⊥ :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero' le_rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeIdeal_eq_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 ↔ I = 1 := by
simpa only [Ideal.one_eq_top] using coeIdeal_inj
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_eq_one FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one
theorem coeIdeal_ne_one {I : Ideal R} : (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 1 ↔ I ≠ 1 :=
not_iff_not.mpr coeIdeal_eq_one
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_ne_one FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_ne_one
theorem num_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} : I.num = 0 ↔ I = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_num_eq_bot zero_not_mem_nonZeroDivisors h,
fun h ↦ h ▸ num_zero_eq (IsFractionRing.injective R K)⟩
end IsFractionRing
section Quotient
/-!
### `quotient` section
This section defines the ideal quotient of fractional ideals.
In this section we need that each non-zero `y : R` has an inverse in
the localization, i.e. that the localization is a field. We satisfy this
assumption by taking `S = nonZeroDivisors R`, `R`'s localization at which
is a field because `R` is a domain.
-/
open scoped Classical
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [frac : IsFractionRing R₁ K]
instance : Nontrivial (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
have this : (1 : K) ∈ (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := by
rw [← (algebraMap R₁ K).map_one]
simpa only [h] using coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1
one_ne_zero ((mem_zero_iff _).mp this)⟩⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : I ≠ 0 := fun hI =>
zero_ne_one' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
(by
convert h
simp [hI])
#align fractional_ideal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one FractionalIdeal.ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one
variable [IsDomain R₁]
theorem _root_.IsFractional.div_of_nonzero {I J : Submodule R₁ K} :
IsFractional R₁⁰ I → IsFractional R₁⁰ J → J ≠ 0 → IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J)
| ⟨aI, haI, hI⟩, ⟨aJ, haJ, hJ⟩, h => by
obtain ⟨y, mem_J, not_mem_zero⟩ :=
SetLike.exists_of_lt (show 0 < J by simpa only using bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.mpr h)
obtain ⟨y', hy'⟩ := hJ y mem_J
use aI * y'
constructor
· apply (nonZeroDivisors R₁).mul_mem haI (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mpr _)
intro y'_eq_zero
have : algebraMap R₁ K aJ * y = 0 := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, ← hy', y'_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
have y_zero :=
(mul_eq_zero.mp this).resolve_left
(mt ((injective_iff_map_eq_zero (algebraMap R₁ K)).1 (IsFractionRing.injective _ _) _)
(mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp haJ))
apply not_mem_zero
simpa
intro b hb
convert hI _ (hb _ (Submodule.smul_mem _ aJ mem_J)) using 1
rw [← hy', mul_comm b, ← Algebra.smul_def, mul_smul]
#align is_fractional.div_of_nonzero IsFractional.div_of_nonzero
theorem fractional_div_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
IsFractional R₁⁰ (I / J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
I.isFractional.div_of_nonzero J.isFractional fun H =>
h <| coeToSubmodule_injective <| H.trans coe_zero.symm
#align fractional_ideal.fractional_div_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.fractional_div_of_nonzero
noncomputable instance : Div (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
⟨fun I J => if h : J = 0 then 0 else ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩⟩
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
@[simp]
theorem div_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align fractional_ideal.div_zero FractionalIdeal.div_zero
theorem div_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
I / J = ⟨I / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ :=
dif_neg h
#align fractional_ideal.div_nonzero FractionalIdeal.div_nonzero
@[simp]
theorem coe_div {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ : J ≠ 0) :
(↑(I / J) : Submodule R₁ K) = ↑I / (↑J : Submodule R₁ K) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_neg hJ)
#align fractional_ideal.coe_div FractionalIdeal.coe_div
theorem mem_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) {x} :
x ∈ I / J ↔ ∀ y ∈ J, x * y ∈ I := by
rw [div_nonzero h]
exact Submodule.mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem
#align fractional_ideal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.mem_div_iff_of_nonzero
theorem mul_one_div_le_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, div_zero, mul_zero]
exact zero_le 1
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI, coe_one]
apply Submodule.mul_one_div_le_one
#align fractional_ideal.mul_one_div_le_one FractionalIdeal.mul_one_div_le_one
theorem le_self_mul_one_div {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * (1 / I) := by
by_cases hI_nz : I = 0
· rw [hI_nz, div_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_mul, coe_div hI_nz, coe_one]
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one] at hI
exact Submodule.le_self_mul_one_div hI
#align fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_one_div FractionalIdeal.le_self_mul_one_div
theorem le_div_iff_of_nonzero {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ J', x * y ∈ J :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mp (h hx), fun h x hx =>
(mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hJ').mpr (h x hx)⟩
#align fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.le_div_iff_of_nonzero
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le {I J J' : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hJ' : J' ≠ 0) :
I ≤ J / J' ↔ I * J' ≤ J := by
rw [div_nonzero hJ']
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [← coe_le_coe (I := I * J') (J := J), coe_mul]
exact Submodule.le_div_iff_mul_le
#align fractional_ideal.le_div_iff_mul_le FractionalIdeal.le_div_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
theorem div_one {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I / 1 = I := by
rw [div_nonzero (one_ne_zero' (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K))]
ext
constructor <;> intro h
· simpa using mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mp h 1 ((algebraMap R₁ K).map_one ▸ coe_mem_one R₁⁰ 1)
· apply mem_div_iff_forall_mul_mem.mpr
rintro y ⟨y', _, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: this used to be { convert; rw }, flipped the order.
rw [mul_comm, Algebra.linearMap_apply, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ y' h
#align fractional_ideal.div_one FractionalIdeal.div_one
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) :
J = 1 / I := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align fractional_ideal.eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right FractionalIdeal.eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right
theorem mul_div_self_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * (1 / I) = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨1 / I, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right I J hJ]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_div_self_cancel_iff
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
theorem map_div (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(I / J).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = I.map h / J.map h := by
by_cases H : J = 0
· rw [H, div_zero, map_zero, div_zero]
· -- Porting note: `simp` wouldn't apply these lemmas so do them manually using `rw`
rw [← coeToSubmodule_inj, div_nonzero H, div_nonzero (map_ne_zero _ H)]
simp [Submodule.map_div]
#align fractional_ideal.map_div FractionalIdeal.map_div
-- Porting note: doesn't need to be @[simp] because this follows from `map_one` and `map_div`
theorem map_one_div (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
(1 / I).map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = 1 / I.map h := by rw [map_div, map_one]
#align fractional_ideal.map_one_div FractionalIdeal.map_one_div
end Quotient
section Field
variable {R₁ K L : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Field K] [Field L]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K] [Algebra K L] [IsFractionRing K L]
theorem eq_zero_or_one (I : FractionalIdeal K⁰ L) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 := by
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left]
intro hI
simp_rw [@SetLike.ext_iff _ _ _ I 1, mem_one_iff]
intro x
constructor
· intro x_mem
obtain ⟨n, d, rfl⟩ := IsLocalization.mk'_surjective K⁰ x
refine ⟨n / d, ?_⟩
rw [map_div₀, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div]
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨y, y_ne, y_mem⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_isInteger hI
rw [← div_mul_cancel₀ x y_ne, RingHom.map_mul, ← Algebra.smul_def]
exact smul_mem (M := L) I (x / y) y_mem
#align fractional_ideal.eq_zero_or_one FractionalIdeal.eq_zero_or_one
theorem eq_zero_or_one_of_isField (hF : IsField R₁) (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) : I = 0 ∨ I = 1 :=
letI : Field R₁ := hF.toField
eq_zero_or_one I
#align fractional_ideal.eq_zero_or_one_of_is_field FractionalIdeal.eq_zero_or_one_of_isField
end Field
section PrincipalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] {K : Type*} [Field K]
variable [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
open scoped Classical
variable (R₁)
/-- `FractionalIdeal.span_finset R₁ s f` is the fractional ideal of `R₁` generated by `f '' s`. -/
-- Porting note: `@[simps]` generated a `Subtype.val` coercion instead of a
-- `FractionalIdeal.coeToSubmodule` coercion
def spanFinset {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K :=
⟨Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s), by
obtain ⟨a', ha'⟩ := IsLocalization.exist_integer_multiples R₁⁰ s f
refine ⟨a', a'.2, fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction hx ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ha' i hi
· rw [smul_zero]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_zero
· intro x y hx hy
rw [smul_add]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_add hx hy
· intro c x hx
rw [smul_comm]
exact IsLocalization.isInteger_smul hx⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset FractionalIdeal.spanFinset
@[simp] lemma spanFinset_coe {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → K) :
(spanFinset R₁ s f : Submodule R₁ K) = Submodule.span R₁ (f '' s) :=
rfl
variable {R₁}
@[simp]
theorem spanFinset_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f = 0 ↔ ∀ j ∈ s, f j = 0 := by
simp only [← coeToSubmodule_inj, spanFinset_coe, coe_zero, Submodule.span_eq_bot,
Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset_eq_zero FractionalIdeal.spanFinset_eq_zero
theorem spanFinset_ne_zero {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → K} :
spanFinset R₁ s f ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ j ∈ s, f j ≠ 0 := by simp
#align fractional_ideal.span_finset_ne_zero FractionalIdeal.spanFinset_ne_zero
open Submodule.IsPrincipal
theorem isFractional_span_singleton (x : P) : IsFractional S (span R {x} : Submodule R P) :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_integer_multiple S x
isFractional_span_iff.mpr ⟨a, a.2, fun _ hx' => (Set.mem_singleton_iff.mp hx').symm ▸ ha⟩
#align fractional_ideal.is_fractional_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.isFractional_span_singleton
variable (S)
/-- `spanSingleton x` is the fractional ideal generated by `x` if `0 ∉ S` -/
irreducible_def spanSingleton (x : P) : FractionalIdeal S P :=
⟨span R {x}, isFractional_span_singleton x⟩
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton
-- local attribute [semireducible] span_singleton
@[simp]
theorem coe_spanSingleton (x : P) : (spanSingleton S x : Submodule R P) = span R {x} := by
rw [spanSingleton]
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.coe_spanSingleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_spanSingleton {x y : P} : x ∈ spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : R, z • y = x := by
rw [spanSingleton]
exact Submodule.mem_span_singleton
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton
theorem mem_spanSingleton_self (x : P) : x ∈ spanSingleton S x :=
(mem_spanSingleton S).mpr ⟨1, one_smul _ _⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mem_span_singleton_self FractionalIdeal.mem_spanSingleton_self
variable (P) in
/-- A version of `FractionalIdeal.den_mul_self_eq_num` in terms of fractional ideals. -/
theorem den_mul_self_eq_num' (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
spanSingleton S (algebraMap R P I.den) * I = I.num := by
apply coeToSubmodule_injective
dsimp only
rw [coe_mul, ← smul_eq_mul, coe_spanSingleton, smul_eq_mul, Submodule.span_singleton_mul]
convert I.den_mul_self_eq_num using 1
ext
erw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_smul_set]
simp [Algebra.smul_def]
variable {S}
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_le_iff_mem {x : P} {I : FractionalIdeal S P} :
spanSingleton S x ≤ I ↔ x ∈ I := by
rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_spanSingleton, Submodule.span_singleton_le_iff_mem, mem_coe]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_le_iff_mem FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_le_iff_mem
theorem spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton [NoZeroSMulDivisors R P] {x y : P} :
spanSingleton S x = spanSingleton S y ↔ ∃ z : Rˣ, z • x = y := by
rw [← Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton, spanSingleton, spanSingleton]
exact Subtype.mk_eq_mk
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_eq_spanSingleton
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 670 | 674 | theorem eq_spanSingleton_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal S P) [IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R P)] :
I = spanSingleton S (generator (I : Submodule R P)) := by |
-- Porting note: this used to be `coeToSubmodule_injective (span_singleton_generator ↑I).symm`
-- but Lean 4 struggled to unify everything. Turned it into an explicit `rw`.
rw [spanSingleton, ← coeToSubmodule_inj, coe_mk, span_singleton_generator]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.CPolynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Add
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv_analytic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# Frechet derivatives of analytic functions.
A function expressible as a power series at a point has a Frechet derivative there.
Also the special case in terms of `deriv` when the domain is 1-dimensional.
As an application, we show that continuous multilinear maps are smooth. We also compute their
iterated derivatives, in `ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv_eq`.
-/
open Filter Asymptotics
open scoped ENNReal
universe u v
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type u} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
section fderiv
variable {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
variable {f : E → F} {x : E} {s : Set E}
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasStrictFDerivAt (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p 1)) x := by
refine h.isBigO_image_sub_norm_mul_norm_sub.trans_isLittleO (IsLittleO.of_norm_right ?_)
refine isLittleO_iff_exists_eq_mul.2 ⟨fun y => ‖y - (x, x)‖, ?_, EventuallyEq.rfl⟩
refine (continuous_id.sub continuous_const).norm.tendsto' _ _ ?_
rw [_root_.id, sub_self, norm_zero]
#align has_fpower_series_at.has_strict_fderiv_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasStrictFDerivAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasFDerivAt f (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p 1)) x :=
h.hasStrictFDerivAt.hasFDerivAt
#align has_fpower_series_at.has_fderiv_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.differentiableAt (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align has_fpower_series_at.differentiable_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.differentiableAt
theorem AnalyticAt.differentiableAt : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x → DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x
| ⟨_, hp⟩ => hp.differentiableAt
#align analytic_at.differentiable_at AnalyticAt.differentiableAt
theorem AnalyticAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
h.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align analytic_at.differentiable_within_at AnalyticAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.fderiv_eq (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
fderiv 𝕜 f x = continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p 1) :=
h.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align has_fpower_series_at.fderiv_eq HasFPowerSeriesAt.fderiv_eq
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.differentiableOn [CompleteSpace F]
(h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f (EMetric.ball x r) := fun _ hy =>
(h.analyticAt_of_mem hy).differentiableWithinAt
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.differentiable_on HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.differentiableOn
theorem AnalyticOn.differentiableOn (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := fun y hy =>
(h y hy).differentiableWithinAt
#align analytic_on.differentiable_on AnalyticOn.differentiableOn
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFDerivAt [CompleteSpace F] (h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
{y : E} (hy : (‖y‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
HasFDerivAt f (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p.changeOrigin y 1)) (x + y) :=
(h.changeOrigin hy).hasFPowerSeriesAt.hasFDerivAt
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.has_fderiv_at HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv_eq [CompleteSpace F] (h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r)
{y : E} (hy : (‖y‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
fderiv 𝕜 f (x + y) = continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p.changeOrigin y 1) :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hy).fderiv
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.fderiv_eq HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv_eq
/-- If a function has a power series on a ball, then so does its derivative. -/
theorem HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv [CompleteSpace F] (h : HasFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x r) :
HasFPowerSeriesOnBall (fderiv 𝕜 f) p.derivSeries x r := by
refine .congr (f := fun z ↦ continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p.changeOrigin (z - x) 1)) ?_
fun z hz ↦ ?_
· refine continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F
|>.toContinuousLinearEquiv.toContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFPowerSeriesOnBall ?_
simpa using ((p.hasFPowerSeriesOnBall_changeOrigin 1
(h.r_pos.trans_le h.r_le)).mono h.r_pos h.r_le).comp_sub x
dsimp only
rw [← h.fderiv_eq, add_sub_cancel]
simpa only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, EMetric.mem_ball] using hz
#align has_fpower_series_on_ball.fderiv HasFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv
/-- If a function is analytic on a set `s`, so is its Fréchet derivative. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.fderiv [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (fderiv 𝕜 f) s := by
intro y hy
rcases h y hy with ⟨p, r, hp⟩
exact hp.fderiv.analyticAt
#align analytic_on.fderiv AnalyticOn.fderiv
/-- If a function is analytic on a set `s`, so are its successive Fréchet derivative. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.iteratedFDeriv [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (n : ℕ) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f) s := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [iteratedFDeriv_zero_eq_comp]
exact ((continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm : F →L[𝕜] E[×0]→L[𝕜] F).comp_analyticOn h
· rw [iteratedFDeriv_succ_eq_comp_left]
-- Porting note: for reasons that I do not understand at all, `?g` cannot be inlined.
convert ContinuousLinearMap.comp_analyticOn ?g IH.fderiv
case g => exact ↑(continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin (n + 1) ↦ E) F)
simp
#align analytic_on.iterated_fderiv AnalyticOn.iteratedFDeriv
/-- An analytic function is infinitely differentiable. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.contDiffOn [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
let t := { x | AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x }
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f t from this.mono h
have H : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f t := fun _x hx ↦ hx
have t_open : IsOpen t := isOpen_analyticAt 𝕜 f
contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn
(fun m _ ↦ (H.iteratedFDeriv m).continuousOn.congr
fun _ hx ↦ iteratedFDerivWithin_of_isOpen _ t_open hx)
(fun m _ ↦ (H.iteratedFDeriv m).differentiableOn.congr
fun _ hx ↦ iteratedFDerivWithin_of_isOpen _ t_open hx)
#align analytic_on.cont_diff_on AnalyticOn.contDiffOn
theorem AnalyticAt.contDiffAt [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticAt 𝕜 f x) {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x := by
obtain ⟨s, hs, hf⟩ := h.exists_mem_nhds_analyticOn
exact hf.contDiffOn.contDiffAt hs
end fderiv
section deriv
variable {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 𝕜 F} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
variable {f : 𝕜 → F} {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜}
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasStrictDerivAt (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasStrictDerivAt f (p 1 fun _ => 1) x :=
h.hasStrictFDerivAt.hasStrictDerivAt
#align has_fpower_series_at.has_strict_deriv_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasStrictDerivAt
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
HasDerivAt f (p 1 fun _ => 1) x :=
h.hasStrictDerivAt.hasDerivAt
#align has_fpower_series_at.has_deriv_at HasFPowerSeriesAt.hasDerivAt
protected theorem HasFPowerSeriesAt.deriv (h : HasFPowerSeriesAt f p x) :
deriv f x = p 1 fun _ => 1 :=
h.hasDerivAt.deriv
#align has_fpower_series_at.deriv HasFPowerSeriesAt.deriv
/-- If a function is analytic on a set `s`, so is its derivative. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.deriv [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (deriv f) s :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.apply 𝕜 F (1 : 𝕜)).comp_analyticOn h.fderiv
#align analytic_on.deriv AnalyticOn.deriv
/-- If a function is analytic on a set `s`, so are its successive derivatives. -/
theorem AnalyticOn.iterated_deriv [CompleteSpace F] (h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 f s) (n : ℕ) :
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (_root_.deriv^[n] f) s := by
induction' n with n IH
· exact h
· simpa only [Function.iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply] using IH.deriv
#align analytic_on.iterated_deriv AnalyticOn.iterated_deriv
end deriv
section fderiv
variable {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 E F} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
variable {f : E → F} {x : E} {s : Set E}
/-! The case of continuously polynomial functions. We get the same differentiability
results as for analytic functions, but without the assumptions that `F` is complete. -/
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.differentiableOn
(h : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f (EMetric.ball x r) :=
fun _ hy ↦ (h.cPolynomialAt_of_mem hy).analyticAt.differentiableWithinAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFDerivAt (h : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r)
{y : E} (hy : (‖y‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
HasFDerivAt f (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p.changeOrigin y 1)) (x + y) :=
(h.changeOrigin hy).toHasFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFPowerSeriesAt.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv_eq (h : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r)
{y : E} (hy : (‖y‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < r) :
fderiv 𝕜 f (x + y) = continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p.changeOrigin y 1) :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hy).fderiv
/-- If a function has a finite power series on a ball, then so does its derivative. -/
protected theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv
(h : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x (n + 1) r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fderiv 𝕜 f) p.derivSeries x n r := by
refine .congr (f := fun z ↦ continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F (p.changeOrigin (z - x) 1)) ?_
fun z hz ↦ ?_
· refine continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F
|>.toContinuousLinearEquiv.toContinuousLinearMap.comp_hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall ?_
simpa using
((p.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall_changeOrigin 1 h.finite).mono h.r_pos le_top).comp_sub x
dsimp only
rw [← h.fderiv_eq, add_sub_cancel]
simpa only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub, EMetric.mem_ball] using hz
/-- If a function has a finite power series on a ball, then so does its derivative.
This is a variant of `HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv` where the degree of `f` is `< n`
and not `< n + 1`. -/
theorem HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.fderiv' (h : HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f p x n r) :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall (fderiv 𝕜 f) p.derivSeries x (n - 1) r := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [zero_tsub]
refine HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.bound_zero_of_eq_zero (fun y hy ↦ ?_) h.r_pos fun n ↦ ?_
· rw [Filter.EventuallyEq.fderiv_eq (f := fun _ ↦ 0)]
· rw [fderiv_const, Pi.zero_apply]
· exact Filter.eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem.mpr ⟨EMetric.ball x r,
EMetric.isOpen_ball.mem_nhds hy, fun z hz ↦ by rw [h.eq_zero_of_bound_zero z hz]⟩
· apply ContinuousMultilinearMap.ext; intro a
change (continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 E F) (p.changeOriginSeries 1 n a) = 0
rw [p.changeOriginSeries_finite_of_finite h.finite 1 (Nat.zero_le _)]
exact map_zero _
· rw [← Nat.succ_pred hn] at h
exact h.fderiv
/-- If a function is polynomial on a set `s`, so is its Fréchet derivative. -/
theorem CPolynomialOn.fderiv (h : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (fderiv 𝕜 f) s := by
intro y hy
rcases h y hy with ⟨p, r, n, hp⟩
exact hp.fderiv'.cPolynomialAt
/-- If a function is polynomial on a set `s`, so are its successive Fréchet derivative. -/
theorem CPolynomialOn.iteratedFDeriv (h : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (n : ℕ) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f) s := by
induction' n with n IH
· rw [iteratedFDeriv_zero_eq_comp]
exact ((continuousMultilinearCurryFin0 𝕜 E F).symm : F →L[𝕜] E[×0]→L[𝕜] F).comp_cPolynomialOn h
· rw [iteratedFDeriv_succ_eq_comp_left]
convert ContinuousLinearMap.comp_cPolynomialOn ?g IH.fderiv
case g => exact ↑(continuousMultilinearCurryLeftEquiv 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin (n + 1) ↦ E) F)
simp
/-- A polynomial function is infinitely differentiable. -/
theorem CPolynomialOn.contDiffOn (h : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s :=
let t := { x | CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x }
suffices ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f t from this.mono h
have H : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f t := fun _x hx ↦ hx
have t_open : IsOpen t := isOpen_cPolynomialAt 𝕜 f
contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn
(fun m _ ↦ (H.iteratedFDeriv m).continuousOn.congr
fun _ hx ↦ iteratedFDerivWithin_of_isOpen _ t_open hx)
(fun m _ ↦ (H.iteratedFDeriv m).analyticOn.differentiableOn.congr
fun _ hx ↦ iteratedFDerivWithin_of_isOpen _ t_open hx)
theorem CPolynomialAt.contDiffAt (h : CPolynomialAt 𝕜 f x) {n : ℕ∞} :
ContDiffAt 𝕜 n f x :=
let ⟨_, hs, hf⟩ := h.exists_mem_nhds_cPolynomialOn
hf.contDiffOn.contDiffAt hs
end fderiv
section deriv
variable {p : FormalMultilinearSeries 𝕜 𝕜 F} {r : ℝ≥0∞}
variable {f : 𝕜 → F} {x : 𝕜} {s : Set 𝕜}
/-- If a function is polynomial on a set `s`, so is its derivative. -/
protected theorem CPolynomialOn.deriv (h : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (deriv f) s :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.apply 𝕜 F (1 : 𝕜)).comp_cPolynomialOn h.fderiv
/-- If a function is polynomial on a set `s`, so are its successive derivatives. -/
theorem CPolynomialOn.iterated_deriv (h : CPolynomialOn 𝕜 f s) (n : ℕ) :
CPolynomialOn 𝕜 (deriv^[n] f) s := by
induction' n with n IH
· exact h
· simpa only [Function.iterate_succ', Function.comp_apply] using IH.deriv
end deriv
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable {ι : Type*} {E : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)]
[Fintype ι] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E F)
open FormalMultilinearSeries
protected theorem hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall :
HasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall f f.toFormalMultilinearSeries 0 (Fintype.card ι + 1) ⊤ :=
.mk' (fun m hm ↦ dif_neg (Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hm).ne) ENNReal.zero_lt_top fun y _ ↦ by
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem _ (Finset.self_mem_range_succ _), zero_add]
· rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_pos rfl]; rfl
· intro m _ ne; rw [toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_neg ne.symm]; rfl
theorem changeOriginSeries_support {k l : ℕ} (h : k + l ≠ Fintype.card ι) :
f.toFormalMultilinearSeries.changeOriginSeries k l = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun _ _ ↦ by
simp_rw [FormalMultilinearSeries.changeOriginSeriesTerm,
toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_neg h.symm, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_zero]
variable {n : ℕ∞} (x : ∀ i, E i)
open Finset in
theorem changeOrigin_toFormalMultilinearSeries [DecidableEq ι] :
continuousMultilinearCurryFin1 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) F (f.toFormalMultilinearSeries.changeOrigin x 1) =
f.linearDeriv x := by
ext y
rw [continuousMultilinearCurryFin1_apply, linearDeriv_apply,
changeOrigin, FormalMultilinearSeries.sum]
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· have (l) : 1 + l ≠ Fintype.card ι := by
rw [add_comm, Fintype.card_eq_zero]; exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
simp_rw [Fintype.sum_empty, changeOriginSeries_support _ (this _), zero_apply _, tsum_zero]; rfl
rw [tsum_eq_single (Fintype.card ι - 1), changeOriginSeries]; swap
· intro m hm
rw [Ne, eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le (by exact Fintype.card_pos), add_comm] at hm
rw [f.changeOriginSeries_support hm, zero_apply]
rw [sum_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.sum_apply, Fin.snoc_zero]
simp_rw [changeOriginSeriesTerm_apply]
refine (Fintype.sum_bijective (?_ ∘ Fintype.equivFinOfCardEq (Nat.add_sub_of_le
Fintype.card_pos).symm) (.comp ?_ <| Equiv.bijective _) _ _ fun i ↦ ?_).symm
· exact (⟨{·}ᶜ, by
rw [card_compl, Fintype.card_fin, card_singleton, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]⟩)
· use fun _ _ ↦ (singleton_injective <| compl_injective <| Subtype.ext_iff.mp ·)
intro ⟨s, hs⟩
have h : sᶜ.card = 1 := by rw [card_compl, hs, Fintype.card_fin, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := card_eq_one.mp h
exact ⟨a, Subtype.ext (compl_eq_comm.mp ha)⟩
rw [Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, compl_singleton, piecewise_erase_univ,
toFormalMultilinearSeries, dif_pos (Nat.add_sub_of_le Fintype.card_pos).symm]
simp_rw [domDomCongr_apply, compContinuousLinearMap_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.proj_apply,
Function.update_apply, (Equiv.injective _).eq_iff, ite_apply]
congr; ext j
obtain rfl | hj := eq_or_ne j i
· rw [Function.update_same, if_pos rfl]
· rw [Function.update_noteq hj, if_neg hj]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt [DecidableEq ι] : HasFDerivAt f (f.linearDeriv x) x := by
rw [← changeOrigin_toFormalMultilinearSeries]
convert f.hasFiniteFPowerSeriesOnBall.hasFDerivAt (y := x) ENNReal.coe_lt_top
rw [zero_add]
/-- Technical lemma used in the proof of `hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_iteratedFDeriv`, to compare sums
over embedding of `Fin k` and `Fin (k + 1)`. -/
private lemma _root_.Equiv.succ_embeddingFinSucc_fst_symm_apply {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
{n : ℕ} (e : Fin (n+1) ↪ ι) {k : ι}
(h'k : k ∈ Set.range (Equiv.embeddingFinSucc n ι e).1) (hk : k ∈ Set.range e) :
Fin.succ ((Equiv.embeddingFinSucc n ι e).1.toEquivRange.symm ⟨k, h'k⟩)
= e.toEquivRange.symm ⟨k, hk⟩ := by
rcases hk with ⟨j, rfl⟩
have hj : j ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp at h'k
simp only [Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_symm_apply_self]
have : e j = (Equiv.embeddingFinSucc n ι e).1 (Fin.pred j hj) := by simp
simp_rw [this]
simp [-Equiv.embeddingFinSucc_fst]
/-- A continuous multilinear function `f` admits a Taylor series, whose successive terms are given
by `f.iteratedFDeriv n`. This is the point of the definition of `f.iteratedFDeriv`. -/
theorem hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_iteratedFDeriv :
HasFTaylorSeriesUpTo ⊤ f (fun v n ↦ f.iteratedFDeriv n v) := by
classical
constructor
· simp [ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv]
· rintro n - x
suffices H : curryLeft (f.iteratedFDeriv (Nat.succ n) x) = (∑ e : Fin n ↪ ι,
((iteratedFDerivComponent f e.toEquivRange).linearDeriv
(Pi.compRightL 𝕜 _ Subtype.val x)) ∘L (Pi.compRightL 𝕜 _ Subtype.val)) by
have A : HasFDerivAt (f.iteratedFDeriv n) (∑ e : Fin n ↪ ι,
((iteratedFDerivComponent f e.toEquivRange).linearDeriv (Pi.compRightL 𝕜 _ Subtype.val x))
∘L (Pi.compRightL 𝕜 _ Subtype.val)) x := by
apply HasFDerivAt.sum (fun s _hs ↦ ?_)
exact (ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasFDerivAt _ _).comp x (ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt _)
rwa [← H] at A
ext v m
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.iteratedFDeriv, curryLeft_apply, sum_apply,
iteratedFDerivComponent_apply, Finset.univ_sigma_univ,
Pi.compRightL_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_sum', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp',
Finset.sum_apply, Function.comp_apply, linearDeriv_apply, Finset.sum_sigma']
rw [← (Equiv.embeddingFinSucc n ι).sum_comp]
congr with e
congr with k
by_cases hke : k ∈ Set.range e
· simp only [hke, ↓reduceDite]
split_ifs with hkf
· simp only [← Equiv.succ_embeddingFinSucc_fst_symm_apply e hkf hke, Fin.cons_succ]
· obtain rfl : k = e 0 := by
rcases hke with ⟨j, rfl⟩
simpa using hkf
simp only [Function.Embedding.toEquivRange_symm_apply_self, Fin.cons_zero, Function.update,
Pi.compRightL_apply]
split_ifs with h
· congr!
· exfalso
apply h
simp_rw [← Equiv.embeddingFinSucc_snd e]
· have hkf : k ∉ Set.range (Equiv.embeddingFinSucc n ι e).1 := by
contrapose! hke
rw [Equiv.embeddingFinSucc_fst] at hke
exact Set.range_comp_subset_range _ _ hke
simp only [hke, hkf, ↓reduceDite, Pi.compRightL,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_mk', LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk]
rw [Function.update_noteq]
contrapose! hke
rw [show k = _ from Subtype.ext_iff_val.1 hke, Equiv.embeddingFinSucc_snd e]
exact Set.mem_range_self _
· rintro n -
apply continuous_finset_sum _ (fun e _ ↦ ?_)
exact (ContinuousMultilinearMap.coe_continuous _).comp (ContinuousLinearMap.continuous _)
theorem iteratedFDeriv_eq (n : ℕ) :
iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f = f.iteratedFDeriv n :=
funext fun x ↦ (f.hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_iteratedFDeriv.eq_iteratedFDeriv (m := n) le_top x).symm
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Analytic.lean | 426 | 430 | theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_le (n : ℕ) (x : (i : ι) → E i) :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x‖
≤ Nat.descFactorial (Fintype.card ι) n * ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - n) := by |
rw [f.iteratedFDeriv_eq]
exact f.norm_iteratedFDeriv_le' n x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Monotone g) : iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a :=
iSup_add_iSup fun i j => ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add (hf <| le_sup_left) (hg <| le_sup_right)⟩
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_of_monotone ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone
theorem finset_sum_iSup_nat {α} {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) : (∑ a ∈ s, iSup (f a)) = ⨆ n, ∑ a ∈ s, f a n := by
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a s has ih
simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [ih, iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone (hf a)]
intro i j h
exact Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => hf a h
#align ennreal.finset_sum_supr_nat ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * iSup f = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· obtain rfl : f = fun _ => 0 := funext hf
simp only [iSup_zero_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· refine (monotone_id.const_mul' _).map_iSup_of_continuousAt ?_ (mul_zero a)
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id (Or.inl ?_)
exact mt iSup_eq_zero.1 hf
#align ennreal.mul_supr ENNReal.mul_iSup
theorem mul_sSup {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, a * i := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.mul_Sup ENNReal.mul_sSup
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
#align ennreal.supr_mul ENNReal.iSup_mul
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (f : ι → ℝ≥0∞)
(c : R) : (c • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, c • f i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `iSup _` with `iSup f`
simp only [← smul_one_mul c (f _), ← smul_one_mul c (iSup f), ENNReal.mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.smul_supr ENNReal.smul_iSup
theorem smul_sSup {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (c : R) :
c • sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, c • i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `_` with `s`
simp_rw [← smul_one_mul c (sSup s), ENNReal.mul_sSup, smul_one_mul]
#align ennreal.smul_Sup ENNReal.smul_sSup
theorem iSup_div {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f / a = ⨆ i, f i / a :=
iSup_mul
#align ennreal.supr_div ENNReal.iSup_div
protected theorem tendsto_coe_sub {b : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun b : ℝ≥0∞ => ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
continuous_nnreal_sub.tendsto _
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub ENNReal.tendsto_coe_sub
theorem sub_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {b : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a < ∞) :
(a - ⨆ i, b i) = ⨅ i, a - b i :=
antitone_const_tsub.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuous_sub_left hr.ne).continuousAt
#align ennreal.sub_supr ENNReal.sub_iSup
theorem exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, hs⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∉ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∉ s :=
exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top ℝ≥0∞
exact ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, fun h => hs.1 0 (by simp) h, fun h => hs.2 ∞ (by simp) h⟩
#align ennreal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
theorem exists_lt_add_of_lt_add {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x < y + z) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
∃ y' z', y' < y ∧ z' < z ∧ x < y' + z' := by
have : NeZero y := ⟨hy⟩
have : NeZero z := ⟨hz⟩
have A : Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 + p.2) (𝓝[<] y ×ˢ 𝓝[<] z) (𝓝 (y + z)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ (Filter.prod_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
rw [← nhds_prod_eq]
exact tendsto_add
rcases ((A.eventually (lt_mem_nhds h)).and
(Filter.prod_mem_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists with
⟨⟨y', z'⟩, hx, hy', hz'⟩
exact ⟨y', z', hy', hz', hx⟩
#align ennreal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add ENNReal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add
theorem ofReal_cinfi (f : α → ℝ) [Nonempty α] :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
by_cases hf : BddBelow (range f)
· exact
Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
(fun i j hij => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hij) hf
· symm
rw [Real.iInf_of_not_bddBelow hf, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem, hy_neg⟩ := not_bddBelow_iff.mp hf 0
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hy_mem
refine fun x hx => ⟨i, ?_⟩
rwa [ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hy_neg.le]
#align ennreal.of_real_cinfi ENNReal.ofReal_cinfi
end TopologicalSpace
section Liminf
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, x n < R := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h r] with i hi using hi.trans (le_abs_self (x i))
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, R < x n := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h (-r)] with i hi using(le_neg.1 hi).trans (neg_le_abs _)
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top'
theorem exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hf : liminf (fun i => (Real.nnabs (x i) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞)
(hbdd : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun i => |x i|) :
∃ a b : ℚ, a < b ∧ (∃ᶠ i in l, x i < a) ∧ ∃ᶠ i in l, ↑b < x i := by
rw [isBoundedUnder_le_abs, not_and_or] at hbdd
obtain hbdd | hbdd := hbdd
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_gt R
refine ⟨q, q + 1, (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le hq (not_lt.1 hx)).le
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q + 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_lt R
refine ⟨q - 1, q, (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q - 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 ((not_lt.1 hx).trans hq.le)
#align ennreal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under ENNReal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under
end Liminf
section tsum
variable {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
@[norm_cast]
protected theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↑r ↔ HasSum f r := by
simp only [HasSum, ← coe_finset_sum, tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.has_sum_coe ENNReal.hasSum_coe
protected theorem tsum_coe_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0} (h : HasSum f r) : (∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = r :=
(ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 h).tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq
protected theorem coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : Summable f → ↑(tsum f) = ∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by rw [hr.tsum_eq, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
#align ennreal.coe_tsum ENNReal.coe_tsum
protected theorem hasSum : HasSum f (⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a) :=
tendsto_atTop_iSup fun _ _ => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset
#align ennreal.has_sum ENNReal.hasSum
@[simp]
protected theorem summable : Summable f :=
⟨_, ENNReal.hasSum⟩
#align ennreal.summable ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → ℝ≥0} : (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ENNReal.coe_tsum h ▸ ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
lift ∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞) to ℝ≥0 using h with a ha
refine ⟨a, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 ?_⟩
rw [ha]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum : ∑' a, f a = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a :=
ENNReal.hasSum.tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Finset α) (hs : ∀ t, ∃ i, t ⊆ s i) :
∑' a, f a = ⨆ i, ∑ a ∈ s i, f a := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
symm
change ⨆ i : ι, (fun t : Finset α => ∑ a ∈ t, f a) (s i) = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a
exact (Finset.sum_mono_set f).iSup_comp_eq hs
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum'
protected theorem tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : ∀ a, β a → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma ENNReal.tsum_sigma
protected theorem tsum_sigma' {β : α → Type*} (f : (Σa, β a) → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma' ENNReal.tsum_sigma'
protected theorem tsum_prod {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod ENNReal.tsum_prod
protected theorem tsum_prod' {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f (a, b) :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod' ENNReal.tsum_prod'
protected theorem tsum_comm {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' a, ∑' b, f a b = ∑' b, ∑' a, f a b :=
tsum_comm' ENNReal.summable (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_comm ENNReal.tsum_comm
protected theorem tsum_add : ∑' a, (f a + g a) = ∑' a, f a + ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_add ENNReal.tsum_add
protected theorem tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : ∑' a, f a ≤ ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_le_tsum h ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_le_tsum ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum
@[gcongr]
protected theorem _root_.GCongr.ennreal_tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum h
protected theorem sum_le_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Finset α) : ∑ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
sum_le_tsum s (fun _ _ => zero_le _) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.sum_le_tsum ENNReal.sum_le_tsum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat' {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {N : ℕ → ℕ} (hN : Tendsto N atTop atTop) :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range (N i), f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ fun t =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := t.exists_nat_subset_range
let ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop hN 0 n
⟨k, Finset.Subset.trans hn (Finset.range_mono hk)⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat'
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range i, f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = liminf (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.liminf_eq.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_limsup_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = limsup (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.limsup_eq.symm
protected theorem le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ ∑' a, f a :=
le_tsum' ENNReal.summable a
#align ennreal.le_tsum ENNReal.le_tsum
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_eq_zero : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
tsum_eq_zero_iff ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_zero ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero
protected theorem tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → ∑' a, f a = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => top_unique <| ha ▸ ENNReal.le_tsum a
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top
protected theorem lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top {a : α → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞) (j : α) :
a j < ∞ := by
contrapose! tsum_ne_top with h
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨j, top_unique h⟩
#align ennreal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_top [Nonempty α] : ∑' _ : α, ∞ = ∞ :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_top ENNReal.tsum_top
theorem tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero {α : Type*} [Infinite α] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
∑' _ : α, c = ∞ := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c) atTop (𝓝 (∞ * c)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_nat_nhds_top
simp only [true_or_iff, top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
have B : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c ≤ ∑' _ : α, c := fun n => by
rcases Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n with ⟨s, hs⟩
simpa [hs] using @ENNReal.sum_le_tsum α (fun _ => c) s
simpa [hc] using le_of_tendsto' A B
#align ennreal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero
protected theorem ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : ∑' a, f a ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ := fun ha =>
h <| ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
#align ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top
protected theorem tsum_mul_left : ∑' i, a * f i = a * ∑' i, f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· simp [hf]
· rw [← ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hf
have : Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑ j ∈ s, a * f j) atTop (𝓝 (a * ∑' i, f i)) := by
simp only [← Finset.mul_sum]
exact ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.summable.hasSum (Or.inl hf)
exact HasSum.tsum_eq this
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_left ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
protected theorem tsum_mul_right : ∑' i, f i * a = (∑' i, f i) * a := by
simp [mul_comm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_right ENNReal.tsum_mul_right
protected theorem tsum_const_smul {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (a : R) :
∑' i, a • f i = a • ∑' i, f i := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using @ENNReal.tsum_mul_left _ (a • (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) _
#align ennreal.tsum_const_smul ENNReal.tsum_const_smul
@[simp]
theorem tsum_iSup_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} : (∑' b : α, ⨆ _ : a = b, f b) = f a :=
(tsum_eq_single a fun _ h => by simp [h.symm]).trans <| by simp
#align ennreal.tsum_supr_eq ENNReal.tsum_iSup_eq
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
refine ⟨HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← iSup_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat]
· exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
· exact fun s t hst => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (Finset.range_subset.2 hst)
#align ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem tendsto_nat_tsum (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
rw [← hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_tsum ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum
theorem toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) (x : α) :
(((ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = f x :=
coe_toNNReal <| ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf _
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Summable (ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) := by
simpa only [← tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top hf] using hf
#align ennreal.summable_to_nnreal_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) := by
have f_ne_top : ∀ n, f n ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
have h_f_coe : f = fun n => ((f n).toNNReal : ENNReal) :=
funext fun n => (coe_toNNReal (f_ne_top n)).symm
rw [h_f_coe, ← @coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact NNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable (summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top hf)
#align ennreal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
exact tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hf
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover the whole
space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑' b : { x // x ∉ s }, f b) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
convert ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 (NNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero f)
rw [ENNReal.coe_tsum]
exact NNReal.summable_comp_injective (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf) Subtype.coe_injective
#align ennreal.tendsto_tsum_compl_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero
protected theorem tsum_apply {ι α : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : α} :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
tsum_apply <| Pi.summable.mpr fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_apply ENNReal.tsum_apply
theorem tsum_sub {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : ∑' i, g i ≠ ∞) (h₂ : g ≤ f) :
∑' i, (f i - g i) = ∑' i, f i - ∑' i, g i :=
have : ∀ i, f i - g i + g i = f i := fun i => tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₂ i)
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h₁ <| by simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_add, this]
#align ennreal.tsum_sub ENNReal.tsum_sub
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' x, g (f x) ≤ ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj f hf (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' y, g y ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) :=
calc ∑' y, g y = ∑' y, g (f (surjInv hf y)) := by simp only [surjInv_eq hf]
_ ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) := tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf) _
theorem tsum_mono_subtype (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∑' x : s, f x ≤ ∑' x : t, f x :=
tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (inclusion_injective h) _
#align ennreal.tsum_mono_subtype ENNReal.tsum_mono_subtype
theorem tsum_iUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' x : Σ i, t i, f x.2 :=
tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective (sigmaToiUnion_surjective t) _
_ = ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x := ENNReal.tsum_sigma' _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s , t i, f x ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x = ∑' x : ⋃ i : s, t i, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ <| by simp
_ ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x := tsum_iUnion_le_tsum _ _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
(tsum_biUnion_le_tsum f s.toSet t).trans_eq (Finset.tsum_subtype s fun i => ∑' x : t i, f x)
#align ennreal.tsum_bUnion_le ENNReal.tsum_biUnion_le
theorem tsum_iUnion_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i, ∑' x : t i, f x := by
rw [← tsum_fintype]
exact tsum_iUnion_le_tsum f t
#align ennreal.tsum_Union_le ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le
theorem tsum_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x ≤ ∑' x : s, f x + ∑' x : t, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x = ∑' x : ⋃ b, cond b s t, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ union_eq_iUnion
_ ≤ _ := by simpa using tsum_iUnion_le f (cond · s t)
#align ennreal.tsum_union_le ENNReal.tsum_union_le
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (b : β) :
∑' x, f x = f b + ∑' x, ite (x = b) 0 (f x) :=
tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' b ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite ENNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
theorem tsum_add_one_eq_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' n, f n = ∞) (hf0 : f 0 ≠ ∞) :
∑' n, f (n + 1) = ∞ := by
rw [tsum_eq_zero_add' ENNReal.summable, add_eq_top] at hf
exact hf.resolve_left hf0
#align ennreal.tsum_add_one_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_add_one_eq_top
/-- A sum of extended nonnegative reals which is finite can have only finitely many terms
above any positive threshold. -/
theorem finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite := by
by_contra h
have := Infinite.to_subtype h
refine tsum_ne_top (top_unique ?_)
calc ∞ = ∑' _ : { i | ε ≤ a i }, ε := (tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ε_ne_zero).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.val_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun i => i.2) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- Markov's inequality for `Finset.card` and `tsum` in `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (c_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(tsum_le_c : ∑' i, a i ≤ c) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite, ↑hf.toFinset.card ≤ c / ε := by
have hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite :=
finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top (ne_top_of_le_ne_top c_ne_top tsum_le_c) ε_ne_zero
refine ⟨hf, (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (.inl ε_ne_zero) (.inr c_ne_top)).2 ?_⟩
calc ↑hf.toFinset.card * ε = ∑ _i ∈ hf.toFinset, ε := by rw [Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ hf.toFinset, a i := Finset.sum_le_sum fun i => hf.mem_toFinset.1
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _
_ ≤ c := tsum_le_c
#align ennreal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le ENNReal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le
theorem tsum_fiberwise (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : β → γ) :
∑' x, ∑' b : g ⁻¹' {x}, f b = ∑' i, f i := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
let equiv := Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv g
apply (equiv.hasSum_iff.mpr ENNReal.summable.hasSum).sigma
exact fun _ ↦ ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.mpr rfl
end tsum
theorem tendsto_toReal_iff {ι} {fi : Filter ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) {x : ℝ≥0∞}
(hx : x ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun n => (f n).toReal) fi (𝓝 x.toReal) ↔ Tendsto f fi (𝓝 x) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx
simp [tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) := by
rw [NNReal.summable_coe]
exact tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe
theorem tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ ↔ ¬Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) :=
tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe.not_right
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe
theorem hasSum_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x).toReal) (∑' x, (f x).toReal) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hsum
simp only [coe_toReal, ← NNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.hasSum_coe]
exact (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hsum).hasSum
#align ennreal.has_sum_to_real ENNReal.hasSum_toReal
theorem summable_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) : Summable fun x => (f x).toReal :=
(hasSum_toReal hsum).summable
#align ennreal.summable_to_real ENNReal.summable_toReal
end ENNReal
namespace NNReal
theorem tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum {f : β → ℝ≥0} : ∑' b, f b = (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)).toNNReal := by
by_cases h : Summable f
· rw [← ENNReal.coe_tsum h, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
· have A := tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable h
simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, Classical.not_not] at h
simp only [h, ENNReal.top_toNNReal, A]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_to_nnreal_tsum NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem exists_le_hasSum_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : HasSum f r) :
∃ p ≤ r, HasSum g p :=
have : (∑' b, (g b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ r := by
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) ENNReal.summable.hasSum (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hfr)
exact ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
let ⟨p, Eq, hpr⟩ := ENNReal.le_coe_iff.1 this
⟨p, hpr, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 <| Eq ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum⟩
#align nnreal.exists_le_has_sum_of_le NNReal.exists_le_hasSum_of_le
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem summable_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) : Summable f → Summable g
| ⟨_r, hfr⟩ =>
let ⟨_p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_hasSum_of_le hgf hfr
hp.summable
#align nnreal.summable_of_le NNReal.summable_of_le
/-- Summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_nnreal (f : α → ℝ≥0) (h : Summable f) :
f.support.Countable := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe] at h
simpa [support] using h.countable_support
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
rw [← ENNReal.hasSum_coe, ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_finset_sum]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_coe
#align nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ((tendsto_of_monotone ?_).resolve_right h).comp ?_
exacts [Finset.sum_mono_set _, tendsto_finset_range]
· rintro hnat ⟨r, hr⟩
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop hnat _ (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat.1 hr)
#align nnreal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop]
#align nnreal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop.2 fun H => ?_
rcases exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop H 0 c with ⟨n, -, hn⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ (hn.trans_le (h n))
#align nnreal.summable_of_sum_range_le NNReal.summable_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le (summable_of_sum_range_le h) h
#align nnreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le NNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {i : β → α}
(hi : Function.Injective i) : (∑' x, f (i x)) ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj i hi (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) (summable_comp_injective hf hi)
hf
#align nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
theorem summable_sigma {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
constructor
· simp only [← NNReal.summable_coe, NNReal.coe_tsum]
exact fun h => ⟨h.sigma_factor, h.sigma⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simpa only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, ENNReal.tsum_sigma',
ENNReal.coe_tsum (h₁ _)] using h₂
#align nnreal.summable_sigma NNReal.summable_sigma
theorem indicator_summable {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (s : Set α) :
Summable (s.indicator f) := by
refine NNReal.summable_of_le (fun a => le_trans (le_of_eq (s.indicator_apply f a)) ?_) hf
split_ifs
· exact le_refl (f a)
· exact zero_le_coe
#align nnreal.indicator_summable NNReal.indicator_summable
theorem tsum_indicator_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {s : Set α} (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
(∑' x, (s.indicator f) x) ≠ 0 := fun h' =>
let ⟨a, ha, hap⟩ := h
hap ((Set.indicator_apply_eq_self.mpr (absurd ha)).symm.trans
((tsum_eq_zero_iff (indicator_summable hf s)).1 h' a))
#align nnreal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero NNReal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero
open Finset
/-- For `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) : Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← tendsto_coe]
convert _root_.tendsto_sum_nat_add fun i => (f i : ℝ)
norm_cast
#align nnreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
nonrec theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
have A : ∀ a : α, (f a : ℝ) ≤ g a := fun a => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
have : (sf : ℝ) < sg := hasSum_lt A (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hi) (hasSum_coe.2 hf) (hasSum_coe.2 hg)
exact NNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 this
#align nnreal.has_sum_lt NNReal.hasSum_lt
@[mono]
theorem hasSum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg)
(h : f < g) : sf < sg :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
hasSum_lt hle hi hf hg
#align nnreal.has_sum_strict_mono NNReal.hasSum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hg : Summable g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
hasSum_lt h hi (summable_of_le h hg).hasSum hg.hasSum
#align nnreal.tsum_lt_tsum NNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
@[mono]
theorem tsum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (h : f < g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_strict_mono NNReal.tsum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_pos {g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (i : α) (hi : 0 < g i) : 0 < ∑' b, g b := by
rw [← tsum_zero]
exact tsum_lt_tsum (fun a => zero_le _) hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_pos NNReal.tsum_pos
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 1,266 | 1,270 | theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (i : α) :
∑' x, f x = f i + ∑' x, ite (x = i) 0 (f x) := by |
refine tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' i (NNReal.summable_of_le (fun i' => ?_) hf)
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_le', le_rfl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Basic
#align_import category_theory.limits.preserves.shapes.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f11e306adb9f2a393539d2bb4293bf1b42caa7ac"
/-!
# Preserving pullbacks
Constructions to relate the notions of preserving pullbacks and reflecting pullbacks to concrete
pullback cones.
In particular, we show that `pullbackComparison G f g` is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves
the pullback of `f` and `g`.
The dual is also given.
## TODO
* Generalise to wide pullbacks
-/
noncomputable section
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
-- Porting note: need Functor namespace for mapCone
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
section Pullback
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
variable {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : W ⟶ X} {k : W ⟶ Y} (comm : h ≫ f = k ≫ g)
/-- The map of a pullback cone is a limit iff the fork consisting of the mapped morphisms is a
limit. This essentially lets us commute `PullbackCone.mk` with `Functor.mapCone`. -/
def isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv :
IsLimit (mapCone G (PullbackCone.mk h k comm)) ≃
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, comm]) :
PullbackCone (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
(IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan.{v₂} _) _).symm.trans <|
IsLimit.equivIsoLimit <|
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> dsimp <;> simp only [comp_id, id_comp, G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_map_cone_pullback_cone_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv
/-- The property of preserving pullbacks expressed in terms of binary fans. -/
def isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit [PreservesLimit (cospan f g) G]
(l : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk h k comm)) :
have : G.map h ≫ G.map f = G.map k ≫ G.map g := by rw [← G.map_comp, ← G.map_comp,comm]
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) this) :=
isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv G comm (PreservesLimit.preserves l)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_pullback_cone_map_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit
/-- The property of reflecting pullbacks expressed in terms of binary fans. -/
def isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap [ReflectsLimit (cospan f g) G]
(l : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (show G.map h ≫ G.map f = G.map k ≫ G.map g
from by simp only [← G.map_comp,comm]))) : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk h k comm) :=
ReflectsLimit.reflects ((isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv G comm).symm l)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_of_is_limit_pullback_cone_map CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitOfIsLimitPullbackConeMap
variable (f g) [PreservesLimit (cospan f g) G]
/-- If `G` preserves pullbacks and `C` has them, then the pullback cone constructed of the mapped
morphisms of the pullback cone is a limit. -/
def isLimitOfHasPullbackOfPreservesLimit [i : HasPullback f g] :
have : G.map pullback.fst ≫ G.map f = G.map pullback.snd ≫ G.map g := by
simp only [← G.map_comp, pullback.condition];
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (G.map (@pullback.fst _ _ _ _ _ f g i)) (G.map pullback.snd) this) :=
isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit G _ (pullbackIsPullback f g)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit_of_has_pullback_of_preserves_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.isLimitOfHasPullbackOfPreservesLimit
/-- If `F` preserves the pullback of `f, g`, it also preserves the pullback of `g, f`. -/
def preservesPullbackSymmetry : PreservesLimit (cospan g f) G where
preserves {c} hc := by
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan.{v₂} _) _).toFun
apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (PullbackCone.isoMk _).symm
apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply (isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ _).toFun
· refine @PreservesLimit.preserves _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ _ ?_
· dsimp
infer_instance
apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (PullbackCone.isoMk _)
exact (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoCospan.{v₁} _) _).invFun hc
· exact
(c.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inr).symm.trans
(c.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl : _)
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.preservesPullbackSymmetry
theorem hasPullback_of_preservesPullback [HasPullback f g] : HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, isLimitPullbackConeMapOfIsLimit G _ (pullbackIsPullback _ _)⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_of_preserves_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_of_preservesPullback
variable [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)]
/-- If `G` preserves the pullback of `(f,g)`, then the pullback comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)` is
an isomorphism. -/
def PreservesPullback.iso : G.obj (pullback f g) ≅ pullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (isLimitOfHasPullbackOfPreservesLimit G f g) (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback.iso CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPullback.iso
@[simp]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_hom : (PreservesPullback.iso G f g).hom = pullbackComparison G f g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback.iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPullback.iso_hom
@[reassoc]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst :
(PreservesPullback.iso G f g).hom ≫ pullback.fst = G.map pullback.fst := by
simp [PreservesPullback.iso]
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback.iso_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPullback.iso_hom_fst
@[reassoc]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd :
(PreservesPullback.iso G f g).hom ≫ pullback.snd = G.map pullback.snd := by
simp [PreservesPullback.iso]
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback.iso_hom_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPullback.iso_hom_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst :
(PreservesPullback.iso G f g).inv ≫ G.map pullback.fst = pullback.fst := by
simp [PreservesPullback.iso, Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback.iso_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPullback.iso_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem PreservesPullback.iso_inv_snd :
(PreservesPullback.iso G f g).inv ≫ G.map pullback.snd = pullback.snd := by
simp [PreservesPullback.iso, Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pullback.iso_inv_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPullback.iso_inv_snd
end Pullback
section Pushout
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
variable {W X Y Z : C} {h : X ⟶ Z} {k : Y ⟶ Z} {f : W ⟶ X} {g : W ⟶ Y} (comm : f ≫ h = g ≫ k)
/-- The map of a pushout cocone is a colimit iff the cofork consisting of the mapped morphisms is a
colimit. This essentially lets us commute `PushoutCocone.mk` with `Functor.mapCocone`. -/
def isColimitMapCoconePushoutCoconeEquiv :
IsColimit (mapCocone G (PushoutCocone.mk h k comm)) ≃
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, comm]) :
PushoutCocone (G.map f) (G.map g)) :=
(IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoSpan.{v₂} _).symm _).symm.trans <|
IsColimit.equivIsoColimit <|
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;> dsimp <;>
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, ← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_map_cocone_pushout_cocone_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitMapCoconePushoutCoconeEquiv
/-- The property of preserving pushouts expressed in terms of binary cofans. -/
def isColimitPushoutCoconeMapOfIsColimit [PreservesColimit (span f g) G]
(l : IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk h k comm)) :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (show G.map f ≫ G.map h = G.map g ≫ G.map k
from by simp only [← G.map_comp,comm] )) :=
isColimitMapCoconePushoutCoconeEquiv G comm (PreservesColimit.preserves l)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_pushout_cocone_map_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitPushoutCoconeMapOfIsColimit
/-- The property of reflecting pushouts expressed in terms of binary cofans. -/
def isColimitOfIsColimitPushoutCoconeMap [ReflectsColimit (span f g) G]
(l : IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (G.map h) (G.map k) (show G.map f ≫ G.map h =
G.map g ≫ G.map k from by simp only [← G.map_comp,comm]))) :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk h k comm) :=
ReflectsColimit.reflects ((isColimitMapCoconePushoutCoconeEquiv G comm).symm l)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_of_is_colimit_pushout_cocone_map CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitOfIsColimitPushoutCoconeMap
variable (f g) [PreservesColimit (span f g) G]
/-- If `G` preserves pushouts and `C` has them, then the pushout cocone constructed of the mapped
morphisms of the pushout cocone is a colimit. -/
def isColimitOfHasPushoutOfPreservesColimit [i : HasPushout f g] :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (G.map pushout.inl) (G.map (@pushout.inr _ _ _ _ _ f g i))
(show G.map f ≫ G.map pushout.inl = G.map g ≫ G.map pushout.inr from by
simp only [← G.map_comp, pushout.condition])) :=
isColimitPushoutCoconeMapOfIsColimit G _ (pushoutIsPushout f g)
#align category_theory.limits.is_colimit_of_has_pushout_of_preserves_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.isColimitOfHasPushoutOfPreservesColimit
/-- If `F` preserves the pushout of `f, g`, it also preserves the pushout of `g, f`. -/
def preservesPushoutSymmetry : PreservesColimit (span g f) G where
preserves {c} hc := by
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (diagramIsoSpan.{v₂} _).symm _).toFun
apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (PushoutCocone.isoMk _).symm
apply PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
apply (isColimitMapCoconePushoutCoconeEquiv _ _).toFun
· refine @PreservesColimit.preserves _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_ _ ?_ -- Porting note: more TC coddling
· dsimp
infer_instance
· exact PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit hc
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pushout_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.preservesPushoutSymmetry
theorem hasPushout_of_preservesPushout [HasPushout f g] : HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, isColimitPushoutCoconeMapOfIsColimit G _ (pushoutIsPushout _ _)⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_of_preserves_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_of_preservesPushout
variable [HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)]
/-- If `G` preserves the pushout of `(f,g)`, then the pushout comparison map for `G` at `(f,g)` is
an isomorphism. -/
def PreservesPushout.iso : pushout (G.map f) (G.map g) ≅ G.obj (pushout f g) :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _)
(isColimitOfHasPushoutOfPreservesColimit G f g)
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pushout.iso CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPushout.iso
@[simp]
theorem PreservesPushout.iso_hom : (PreservesPushout.iso G f g).hom = pushoutComparison G f g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.preserves_pushout.iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.PreservesPushout.iso_hom
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean | 225 | 228 | theorem PreservesPushout.inl_iso_hom :
pushout.inl ≫ (PreservesPushout.iso G f g).hom = G.map pushout.inl := by |
delta PreservesPushout.iso
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alex J. Best. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Bounds
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic -- Porting note: `LinearOrderedField`, etc
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
#align_import algebra.order.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Pointwise operations on ordered algebraic objects
This file contains lemmas about the effect of pointwise operations on sets with an order structure.
## TODO
`sSup (s • t) = sSup s • sSup t` and `sInf (s • t) = sInf s • sInf t` hold as well but
`CovariantClass` is currently not polymorphic enough to state it.
-/
open Function Set
open Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note: Swapped the place of `CompleteLattice` and `ConditionallyCompleteLattice`
-- due to simpNF problem between `sSup_xx` `csSup_xx`.
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
section One
variable [One α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem sSup_one : sSup (1 : Set α) = 1 :=
sSup_singleton
#align Sup_zero sSup_zero
#align Sup_one sSup_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem sInf_one : sInf (1 : Set α) = 1 :=
sInf_singleton
#align Inf_zero sInf_zero
#align Inf_one sInf_one
end One
section Group
variable [Group α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)]
(s t : Set α)
@[to_additive]
theorem sSup_inv (s : Set α) : sSup s⁻¹ = (sInf s)⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv, sSup_image]
exact ((OrderIso.inv α).map_sInf _).symm
#align Sup_inv sSup_inv
#align Sup_neg sSup_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem sInf_inv (s : Set α) : sInf s⁻¹ = (sSup s)⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv, sInf_image]
exact ((OrderIso.inv α).map_sSup _).symm
#align Inf_inv sInf_inv
#align Inf_neg sInf_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem sSup_mul : sSup (s * t) = sSup s * sSup t :=
(sSup_image2_eq_sSup_sSup fun _ => (OrderIso.mulRight _).to_galoisConnection) fun _ =>
(OrderIso.mulLeft _).to_galoisConnection
#align Sup_mul sSup_mul
#align Sup_add sSup_add
@[to_additive]
theorem sInf_mul : sInf (s * t) = sInf s * sInf t :=
(sInf_image2_eq_sInf_sInf fun _ => (OrderIso.mulRight _).symm.to_galoisConnection) fun _ =>
(OrderIso.mulLeft _).symm.to_galoisConnection
#align Inf_mul sInf_mul
#align Inf_add sInf_add
@[to_additive]
theorem sSup_div : sSup (s / t) = sSup s / sInf t := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, sSup_mul, sSup_inv]
#align Sup_div sSup_div
#align Sup_sub sSup_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem sInf_div : sInf (s / t) = sInf s / sSup t := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, sInf_mul, sInf_inv]
#align Inf_div sInf_div
#align Inf_sub sInf_sub
end Group
end CompleteLattice
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α]
section One
variable [One α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem csSup_one : sSup (1 : Set α) = 1 :=
csSup_singleton _
#align cSup_zero csSup_zero
#align cSup_one csSup_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem csInf_one : sInf (1 : Set α) = 1 :=
csInf_singleton _
#align cInf_zero csInf_zero
#align cInf_one csInf_one
end One
section Group
variable [Group α] [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)]
{s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem csSup_inv (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddBelow s) : sSup s⁻¹ = (sInf s)⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv]
exact ((OrderIso.inv α).map_csInf' hs₀ hs₁).symm
#align cSup_inv csSup_inv
#align cSup_neg csSup_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem csInf_inv (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) : sInf s⁻¹ = (sSup s)⁻¹ := by
rw [← image_inv]
exact ((OrderIso.inv α).map_csSup' hs₀ hs₁).symm
#align cInf_inv csInf_inv
#align cInf_neg csInf_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem csSup_mul (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddAbove t) :
sSup (s * t) = sSup s * sSup t :=
csSup_image2_eq_csSup_csSup (fun _ => (OrderIso.mulRight _).to_galoisConnection)
(fun _ => (OrderIso.mulLeft _).to_galoisConnection) hs₀ hs₁ ht₀ ht₁
#align cSup_mul csSup_mul
#align cSup_add csSup_add
@[to_additive]
theorem csInf_mul (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddBelow s) (ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddBelow t) :
sInf (s * t) = sInf s * sInf t :=
csInf_image2_eq_csInf_csInf (fun _ => (OrderIso.mulRight _).symm.to_galoisConnection)
(fun _ => (OrderIso.mulLeft _).symm.to_galoisConnection) hs₀ hs₁ ht₀ ht₁
#align cInf_mul csInf_mul
#align cInf_add csInf_add
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Pointwise.lean | 160 | 162 | theorem csSup_div (hs₀ : s.Nonempty) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (ht₀ : t.Nonempty) (ht₁ : BddBelow t) :
sSup (s / t) = sSup s / sInf t := by |
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, csSup_mul hs₀ hs₁ ht₀.inv ht₁.inv, csSup_inv ht₀ ht₁, div_eq_mul_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNumbers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_integers from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `ZMod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `PadicInt` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open Padic Metric LocalRing
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def PadicInt (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
{ x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
#align padic_int PadicInt
/-- The ring of `p`-adic integers. -/
notation "ℤ_[" p "]" => PadicInt p
namespace PadicInt
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
theorem ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y :=
Subtype.ext
#align padic_int.ext PadicInt.ext
variable (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : Subring ℚ_[p] where
carrier := { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
zero_mem' := by set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
one_mem' := by set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
add_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _).trans <| max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
mul_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.mul _ _).trans_le <| mul_le_one hx (norm_nonneg _) hy
neg_mem' hx := (norm_neg _).trans_le hx
#align padic_int.subring PadicInt.subring
@[simp]
theorem mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
#align padic_int.mem_subring_iff PadicInt.mem_subring_iff
variable {p}
/-- Addition on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Add ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Add (subring p))
/-- Multiplication on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Mul ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Mul (subring p))
/-- Negation on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Neg ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Neg (subring p))
/-- Subtraction on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Sub ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Sub (subring p))
/-- Zero on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Zero ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Zero (subring p))
instance : Inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
/-- One on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : One ℤ_[p] := ⟨⟨1, by norm_num⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
#align padic_int.mk_zero PadicInt.mk_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_add PadicInt.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_mul PadicInt.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_neg PadicInt.coe_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_sub PadicInt.coe_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_one PadicInt.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_zero PadicInt.coe_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero (z : ℤ_[p]) : (z : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, Subtype.coe_inj]
#align padic_int.coe_eq_zero PadicInt.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_ne_zero (z : ℤ_[p]) : (z : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 := z.coe_eq_zero.not
#align padic_int.coe_ne_zero PadicInt.coe_ne_zero
instance : AddCommGroup ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : AddCommGroup (subring p))
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : CommRing (subring p))
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_nat_cast PadicInt.coe_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_nat_cast := coe_natCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_int_cast PadicInt.coe_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_int_cast := coe_intCast
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def Coe.ringHom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
#align padic_int.coe.ring_hom PadicInt.Coe.ringHom
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p]) ^ n := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_pow PadicInt.coe_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align padic_int.mk_coe PadicInt.mk_coe
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ => if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
#align padic_int.inv PadicInt.inv
instance : CharZero ℤ_[p] where
cast_injective m n h := Nat.cast_injective (by rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h; norm_cast at h)
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem intCast_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 := by
suffices (z1 : ℚ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 from Iff.trans (by norm_cast) this
norm_cast
#align padic_int.coe_int_eq PadicInt.intCast_eq
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated] alias coe_int_eq := intCast_eq
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def ofIntSeq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => seq n) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(PadicSeq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ) by
rw [PadicSeq.norm]
split_ifs with hne <;> norm_cast
apply padicNorm.of_int⟩
#align padic_int.of_int_seq PadicInt.ofIntSeq
end PadicInt
namespace PadicInt
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
instance : MetricSpace ℤ_[p] := Subtype.metricSpace
instance completeSpace : CompleteSpace ℤ_[p] :=
have : IsClosed { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 } := isClosed_le continuous_norm continuous_const
this.completeSpace_coe
#align padic_int.complete_space PadicInt.completeSpace
instance : Norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun z => ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variable {p}
theorem norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
#align padic_int.norm_def PadicInt.norm_def
variable (p)
instance : NormedCommRing ℤ_[p] :=
{ PadicInt.instCommRing with
dist_eq := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
norm_mul := by simp [norm_def]
norm := norm }
instance : NormOneClass ℤ_[p] :=
⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance isAbsoluteValue : IsAbsoluteValue fun z : ℤ_[p] => ‖z‖ where
abv_nonneg' := norm_nonneg
abv_eq_zero' := by simp [norm_eq_zero]
abv_add' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ => norm_add_le _ _
abv_mul' _ _ := by simp only [norm_def, padicNormE.mul, PadicInt.coe_mul]
#align padic_int.is_absolute_value PadicInt.isAbsoluteValue
variable {p}
instance : IsDomain ℤ_[p] := Function.Injective.isDomain (subring p).subtype Subtype.coe_injective
end PadicInt
namespace PadicInt
/-! ### Norm -/
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
#align padic_int.norm_le_one PadicInt.norm_le_one
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z1 * z2‖ = ‖z1‖ * ‖z2‖ := by simp [norm_def]
#align padic_int.norm_mul PadicInt.norm_mul
@[simp]
theorem norm_pow (z : ℤ_[p]) : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖z ^ n‖ = ‖z‖ ^ n
| 0 => by simp
| k + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, norm_mul]
congr
apply norm_pow
#align padic_int.norm_pow PadicInt.norm_pow
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
#align padic_int.nonarchimedean PadicInt.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ :=
padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
#align padic_int.norm_add_eq_max_of_ne PadicInt.norm_add_eq_max_of_ne
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
#align padic_int.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right PadicInt.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
#align padic_int.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left PadicInt.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicIntegers.lean | 303 | 303 | theorem padic_norm_e_of_padicInt (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by | simp [norm_def]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define the natural- and integer-valued floor and ceil functions on linearly ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
* `FloorSemiring`: An ordered semiring with natural-valued floor and ceil.
* `Nat.floor a`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. Equal to `0` if `a < 0`.
* `Nat.ceil a`: Least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n`.
* `FloorRing`: A linearly ordered ring with integer-valued floor and ceil.
* `Int.floor a`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`.
* `Int.ceil a`: Least integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`.
* `Int.fract a`: Fractional part of `a`, defined as `a - floor a`.
* `round a`: Nearest integer to `a`. It rounds halves towards infinity.
## Notations
* `⌊a⌋₊` is `Nat.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉₊` is `Nat.ceil a`.
* `⌊a⌋` is `Int.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉` is `Int.ceil a`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `Nat.floor` and `Nat.ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## TODO
`LinearOrderedRing`/`LinearOrderedSemiring` can be relaxed to `OrderedRing`/`OrderedSemiring` in
many lemmas.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
/-! ### Floor semiring -/
/-- A `FloorSemiring` is an ordered semiring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℕ` satisfying `∀ (n : ℕ) (x : α), n ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (n : α) ≤ x)`.
Note that many lemmas require a `LinearOrder`. Please see the above `TODO`. -/
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor a` computes the greatest natural `n` such that `(n : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil a` computes the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ (n : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor` of a negative element is zero. -/
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
/-- A natural number `n` is smaller than `FloorSemiring.floor a` iff its coercion to `α` is
smaller than `a`. -/
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℕ → α`. -/
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `⌊a⌋₊` is the greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. If `a` is negative, then `⌊a⌋₊ = 0`. -/
def floor : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.floor
#align nat.floor Nat.floor
/-- `⌈a⌉₊` is the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n` -/
def ceil : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.ceil
#align nat.ceil Nat.ceil
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat : (Nat.floor : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_nat Nat.floor_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_nat : (Nat.ceil : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_nat Nat.ceil_nat
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋₊" => Nat.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉₊" => Nat.ceil a
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
theorem le_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a :=
FloorSemiring.gc_floor ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff Nat.le_floor_iff
theorem le_floor (h : (n : α) ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
(le_floor_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h).2 h
#align nat.le_floor Nat.le_floor
theorem floor_lt (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.floor_lt Nat.floor_lt
theorem floor_lt_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
(floor_lt ha).trans <| by rw [Nat.cast_one]
#align nat.floor_lt_one Nat.floor_lt_one
theorem lt_of_floor_lt (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < n) : a < n :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' => (le_floor h').not_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_floor_lt Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
theorem lt_one_of_floor_lt_one (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1) : a < 1 := mod_cast lt_of_floor_lt h
#align nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one Nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one
theorem floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) ≤ a :=
(le_floor_iff ha).1 le_rfl
#align nat.floor_le Nat.floor_le
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊.succ :=
lt_of_floor_lt <| Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align nat.lt_succ_floor Nat.lt_succ_floor
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by simpa using lt_succ_floor a
#align nat.lt_floor_add_one Nat.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact n.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_coe Nat.floor_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-08")] alias floor_coe := floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_zero Nat.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_one Nat.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
Nat.floor_natCast _
theorem floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
ha.lt_or_eq.elim FloorSemiring.floor_of_neg <| by
rintro rfl
exact floor_zero
#align nat.floor_of_nonpos Nat.floor_of_nonpos
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℕ) := fun a b h => by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact le_floor ((floor_le ha).trans h)
#align nat.floor_mono Nat.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋₊ ≤ ⌊y⌋₊ := floor_mono
theorem le_floor_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact
iff_of_false (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn).not_le
(not_le_of_lt <| ha.trans_lt <| cast_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
· exact le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff' Nat.le_floor_iff'
@[simp]
theorem one_le_floor_iff (x : α) : 1 ≤ ⌊x⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
mod_cast @le_floor_iff' α _ _ x 1 one_ne_zero
#align nat.one_le_floor_iff Nat.one_le_floor_iff
theorem floor_lt' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff' hn
#align nat.floor_lt' Nat.floor_lt'
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 221 | 223 | theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by |
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero`
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero, cast_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Amelia Livingston. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Amelia Livingston
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.OreLocalization.Basic
#align_import group_theory.monoid_localization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10ee941346c27bdb5e87bb3535100c0b1f08ac41"
/-!
# Localizations of commutative monoids
Localizing a commutative ring at one of its submonoids does not rely on the ring's addition, so
we can generalize localizations to commutative monoids.
We characterize the localization of a commutative monoid `M` at a submonoid `S` up to
isomorphism; that is, a commutative monoid `N` is the localization of `M` at `S` iff we can find a
monoid homomorphism `f : M →* N` satisfying 3 properties:
1. For all `y ∈ S`, `f y` is a unit;
2. For all `z : N`, there exists `(x, y) : M × S` such that `z * f y = f x`;
3. For all `x, y : M` such that `f x = f y`, there exists `c ∈ S` such that `x * c = y * c`.
(The converse is a consequence of 1.)
Given such a localization map `f : M →* N`, we can define the surjection
`Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'` sending `(x, y) : M × S` to `f x * (f y)⁻¹`, and
`Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift`, the homomorphism from `N` induced by a homomorphism from `M` which
maps elements of `S` to invertible elements of the codomain. Similarly, given commutative monoids
`P, Q`, a submonoid `T` of `P` and a localization map for `T` from `P` to `Q`, then a homomorphism
`g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T` induces a homomorphism of localizations, `LocalizationMap.map`,
from `N` to `Q`. We treat the special case of localizing away from an element in the sections
`AwayMap` and `Away`.
We also define the quotient of `M × S` by the unique congruence relation (equivalence relation
preserving a binary operation) `r` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S`
satisfying '`∀ y ∈ S`, `(1, 1) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`', we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`
whenever `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r`. We show this relation is equivalent to the standard
localization relation.
This defines the localization as a quotient type, `Localization`, but the majority of
subsequent lemmas in the file are given in terms of localizations up to isomorphism, using maps
which satisfy the characteristic predicate.
The Grothendieck group construction corresponds to localizing at the top submonoid, namely making
every element invertible.
## Implementation notes
In maths it is natural to reason up to isomorphism, but in Lean we cannot naturally `rewrite` one
structure with an isomorphic one; one way around this is to isolate a predicate characterizing
a structure up to isomorphism, and reason about things that satisfy the predicate.
The infimum form of the localization congruence relation is chosen as 'canonical' here, since it
shortens some proofs.
To apply a localization map `f` as a function, we use `f.toMap`, as coercions don't work well for
this structure.
To reason about the localization as a quotient type, use `mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'` and associated
lemmas. These show the quotient map `mk : M → S → Localization S` equals the
surjection `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by the map
`Localization.monoidOf : Submonoid.LocalizationMap S (Localization S)` (where `of` establishes the
localization as a quotient type satisfies the characteristic predicate). The lemma
`mk_eq_monoidOf_mk'` hence gives you access to the results in the rest of the file, which are about
the `LocalizationMap.mk'` induced by any localization map.
## TODO
* Show that the localization at the top monoid is a group.
* Generalise to (nonempty) subsemigroups.
* If we acquire more bundlings, we can make `Localization.mkOrderEmbedding` be an ordered monoid
embedding.
## Tags
localization, monoid localization, quotient monoid, congruence relation, characteristic predicate,
commutative monoid, grothendieck group
-/
open Function
namespace AddSubmonoid
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (S : AddSubmonoid M) (N : Type*) [AddCommMonoid N]
/-- The type of AddMonoid homomorphisms satisfying the characteristic predicate: if `f : M →+ N`
satisfies this predicate, then `N` is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure LocalizationMap extends AddMonoidHom M N where
map_add_units' : ∀ y : S, IsAddUnit (toFun y)
surj' : ∀ z : N, ∃ x : M × S, z + toFun x.2 = toFun x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ x y, toFun x = toFun y → ∃ c : S, ↑c + x = ↑c + y
#align add_submonoid.localization_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: no docstrings for AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap
attribute [nolint docBlame] AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_add_units'
AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.surj' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_eq
/-- The AddMonoidHom underlying a `LocalizationMap` of `AddCommMonoid`s. -/
add_decl_doc LocalizationMap.toAddMonoidHom
end AddSubmonoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (S : Submonoid M) (N : Type*) [CommMonoid N] {P : Type*}
[CommMonoid P]
namespace Submonoid
/-- The type of monoid homomorphisms satisfying the characteristic predicate: if `f : M →* N`
satisfies this predicate, then `N` is isomorphic to the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure LocalizationMap extends MonoidHom M N where
map_units' : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (toFun y)
surj' : ∀ z : N, ∃ x : M × S, z * toFun x.2 = toFun x.1
exists_of_eq : ∀ x y, toFun x = toFun y → ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = c * y
#align submonoid.localization_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: no docstrings for Submonoid.LocalizationMap
attribute [nolint docBlame] Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_units' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.surj'
Submonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_eq
attribute [to_additive] Submonoid.LocalizationMap
-- Porting note: this translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive] Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMonoidHom
/-- The monoid hom underlying a `LocalizationMap`. -/
add_decl_doc LocalizationMap.toMonoidHom
end Submonoid
namespace Localization
-- Porting note: this does not work so it is done explicitly instead
-- run_cmd to_additive.map_namespace `Localization `AddLocalization
-- run_cmd Elab.Command.liftCoreM <| ToAdditive.insertTranslation `Localization `AddLocalization
/-- The congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a submonoid of `M`, whose
quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`, defined as the unique congruence relation on
`M × S` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S` where for all `y ∈ S`,
`(1, 1) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`, we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r` implies
`(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`. -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r
"The congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` an `AddCommMonoid` and `S` an `AddSubmonoid` of `M`,
whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`, defined as the unique congruence relation on
`M × S` such that for any other congruence relation `s` on `M × S` where for all `y ∈ S`,
`(0, 0) ∼ (y, y)` under `s`, we have that `(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `r` implies
`(x₁, y₁) ∼ (x₂, y₂)` by `s`."]
def r (S : Submonoid M) : Con (M × S) :=
sInf { c | ∀ y : S, c 1 (y, y) }
#align localization.r Localization.r
#align add_localization.r AddLocalization.r
/-- An alternate form of the congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a
submonoid of `M`, whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r'
"An alternate form of the congruence relation on `M × S`, `M` a `CommMonoid` and `S` a
submonoid of `M`, whose quotient is the localization of `M` at `S`."]
def r' : Con (M × S) := by
-- note we multiply by `c` on the left so that we can later generalize to `•`
refine
{ r := fun a b : M × S ↦ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑b.2 * a.1) = c * (a.2 * b.1)
iseqv := ⟨fun a ↦ ⟨1, rfl⟩, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨c, hc.symm⟩, ?_⟩
mul' := ?_ }
· rintro a b c ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩
use t₂ * t₁ * b.2
simp only [Submonoid.coe_mul]
calc
(t₂ * t₁ * b.2 : M) * (c.2 * a.1) = t₂ * c.2 * (t₁ * (b.2 * a.1)) := by ac_rfl
_ = t₁ * a.2 * (t₂ * (c.2 * b.1)) := by rw [ht₁]; ac_rfl
_ = t₂ * t₁ * b.2 * (a.2 * c.1) := by rw [ht₂]; ac_rfl
· rintro a b c d ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩
use t₂ * t₁
calc
(t₂ * t₁ : M) * (b.2 * d.2 * (a.1 * c.1)) = t₂ * (d.2 * c.1) * (t₁ * (b.2 * a.1)) := by ac_rfl
_ = (t₂ * t₁ : M) * (a.2 * c.2 * (b.1 * d.1)) := by rw [ht₁, ht₂]; ac_rfl
#align localization.r' Localization.r'
#align add_localization.r' AddLocalization.r'
/-- The congruence relation used to localize a `CommMonoid` at a submonoid can be expressed
equivalently as an infimum (see `Localization.r`) or explicitly
(see `Localization.r'`). -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r_eq_r'
"The additive congruence relation used to localize an `AddCommMonoid` at a submonoid can be
expressed equivalently as an infimum (see `AddLocalization.r`) or explicitly
(see `AddLocalization.r'`)."]
theorem r_eq_r' : r S = r' S :=
le_antisymm (sInf_le fun _ ↦ ⟨1, by simp⟩) <|
le_sInf fun b H ⟨p, q⟩ ⟨x, y⟩ ⟨t, ht⟩ ↦ by
rw [← one_mul (p, q), ← one_mul (x, y)]
refine b.trans (b.mul (H (t * y)) (b.refl _)) ?_
convert b.symm (b.mul (H (t * q)) (b.refl (x, y))) using 1
dsimp only [Prod.mk_mul_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul] at ht ⊢
simp_rw [mul_assoc, ht, mul_comm y q]
#align localization.r_eq_r' Localization.r_eq_r'
#align add_localization.r_eq_r' AddLocalization.r_eq_r'
variable {S}
@[to_additive AddLocalization.r_iff_exists]
theorem r_iff_exists {x y : M × S} : r S x y ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑y.2 * x.1) = c * (x.2 * y.1) := by
rw [r_eq_r' S]; rfl
#align localization.r_iff_exists Localization.r_iff_exists
#align add_localization.r_iff_exists AddLocalization.r_iff_exists
end Localization
/-- The localization of a `CommMonoid` at one of its submonoids (as a quotient type). -/
@[to_additive AddLocalization
"The localization of an `AddCommMonoid` at one of its submonoids (as a quotient type)."]
def Localization := (Localization.r S).Quotient
#align localization Localization
#align add_localization AddLocalization
namespace Localization
@[to_additive]
instance inhabited : Inhabited (Localization S) := Con.Quotient.inhabited
#align localization.inhabited Localization.inhabited
#align add_localization.inhabited AddLocalization.inhabited
/-- Multiplication in a `Localization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ * ⟨c, d⟩ = ⟨a * c, b * d⟩`. -/
@[to_additive "Addition in an `AddLocalization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ + ⟨c, d⟩ = ⟨a + c, b + d⟩`.
Should not be confused with the ring localization counterpart `Localization.add`, which maps
`⟨a, b⟩ + ⟨c, d⟩` to `⟨d * a + b * c, b * d⟩`."]
protected irreducible_def mul : Localization S → Localization S → Localization S :=
(r S).commMonoid.mul
#align localization.mul Localization.mul
#align add_localization.add AddLocalization.add
@[to_additive]
instance : Mul (Localization S) := ⟨Localization.mul S⟩
/-- The identity element of a `Localization` is defined as `⟨1, 1⟩`. -/
@[to_additive "The identity element of an `AddLocalization` is defined as `⟨0, 0⟩`.
Should not be confused with the ring localization counterpart `Localization.zero`,
which is defined as `⟨0, 1⟩`."]
protected irreducible_def one : Localization S := (r S).commMonoid.one
#align localization.one Localization.one
#align add_localization.zero AddLocalization.zero
@[to_additive]
instance : One (Localization S) := ⟨Localization.one S⟩
/-- Exponentiation in a `Localization` is defined as `⟨a, b⟩ ^ n = ⟨a ^ n, b ^ n⟩`.
This is a separate `irreducible` def to ensure the elaborator doesn't waste its time
trying to unify some huge recursive definition with itself, but unfolded one step less.
-/
@[to_additive "Multiplication with a natural in an `AddLocalization` is defined as
`n • ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨n • a, n • b⟩`.
This is a separate `irreducible` def to ensure the elaborator doesn't waste its time
trying to unify some huge recursive definition with itself, but unfolded one step less."]
protected irreducible_def npow : ℕ → Localization S → Localization S := (r S).commMonoid.npow
#align localization.npow Localization.npow
#align add_localization.nsmul AddLocalization.nsmul
@[to_additive]
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid (Localization S) where
mul := (· * ·)
one := 1
mul_assoc x y z := show (x.mul S y).mul S z = x.mul S (y.mul S z) by
rw [Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_assoc
mul_comm x y := show x.mul S y = y.mul S x by
rw [Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_comm
mul_one x := show x.mul S (.one S) = x by
rw [Localization.mul, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.mul_one
one_mul x := show (Localization.one S).mul S x = x by
rw [Localization.mul, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.one_mul
npow := Localization.npow S
npow_zero x := show Localization.npow S 0 x = .one S by
rw [Localization.npow, Localization.one]; apply (r S).commMonoid.npow_zero
npow_succ n x := show Localization.npow S n.succ x = (Localization.npow S n x).mul S x by
rw [Localization.npow, Localization.mul]; apply (r S).commMonoid.npow_succ
variable {S}
/-- Given a `CommMonoid` `M` and submonoid `S`, `mk` sends `x : M`, `y ∈ S` to the equivalence
class of `(x, y)` in the localization of `M` at `S`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an `AddCommMonoid` `M` and submonoid `S`, `mk` sends `x : M`, `y ∈ S` to
the equivalence class of `(x, y)` in the localization of `M` at `S`."]
def mk (x : M) (y : S) : Localization S := (r S).mk' (x, y)
#align localization.mk Localization.mk
#align add_localization.mk AddLocalization.mk
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_mk_iff {a c : M} {b d : S} : mk a b = mk c d ↔ r S ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ := (r S).eq
#align localization.mk_eq_mk_iff Localization.mk_eq_mk_iff
#align add_localization.mk_eq_mk_iff AddLocalization.mk_eq_mk_iff
universe u
/-- Dependent recursion principle for `Localizations`: given elements `f a b : p (mk a b)`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d` (with the correct coercions),
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"Dependent recursion principle for `AddLocalizations`: given elements `f a b : p (mk a b)`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d` (with the correct coercions),
then `f` is defined on the whole `AddLocalization S`."]
def rec {p : Localization S → Sort u} (f : ∀ (a : M) (b : S), p (mk a b))
(H : ∀ {a c : M} {b d : S} (h : r S (a, b) (c, d)),
(Eq.ndrec (f a b) (mk_eq_mk_iff.mpr h) : p (mk c d)) = f c d) (x) : p x :=
Quot.rec (fun y ↦ Eq.ndrec (f y.1 y.2) (by rfl)) (fun y z h ↦ by cases y; cases z; exact H h) x
#align localization.rec Localization.rec
#align add_localization.rec AddLocalization.rec
/-- Copy of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` for `Localization` -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "Copy of `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂` for `AddLocalization`"]
def recOnSubsingleton₂ {r : Localization S → Localization S → Sort u}
[h : ∀ (a c : M) (b d : S), Subsingleton (r (mk a b) (mk c d))] (x y : Localization S)
(f : ∀ (a c : M) (b d : S), r (mk a b) (mk c d)) : r x y :=
@Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' _ _ _ _ r (Prod.rec fun _ _ => Prod.rec fun _ _ => h _ _ _ _) x y
(Prod.rec fun _ _ => Prod.rec fun _ _ => f _ _ _ _)
#align localization.rec_on_subsingleton₂ Localization.recOnSubsingleton₂
#align add_localization.rec_on_subsingleton₂ AddLocalization.recOnSubsingleton₂
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_mul (a c : M) (b d : S) : mk a b * mk c d = mk (a * c) (b * d) :=
show Localization.mul S _ _ = _ by rw [Localization.mul]; rfl
#align localization.mk_mul Localization.mk_mul
#align add_localization.mk_add AddLocalization.mk_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_one : mk 1 (1 : S) = 1 :=
show mk _ _ = .one S by rw [Localization.one]; rfl
#align localization.mk_one Localization.mk_one
#align add_localization.mk_zero AddLocalization.mk_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_pow (n : ℕ) (a : M) (b : S) : mk a b ^ n = mk (a ^ n) (b ^ n) :=
show Localization.npow S _ _ = _ by rw [Localization.npow]; rfl
#align localization.mk_pow Localization.mk_pow
#align add_localization.mk_nsmul AddLocalization.mk_nsmul
-- Porting note: mathport translated `rec` to `ndrec` in the name of this lemma
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ndrec_mk {p : Localization S → Sort u} (f : ∀ (a : M) (b : S), p (mk a b)) (H) (a : M)
(b : S) : (rec f H (mk a b) : p (mk a b)) = f a b := rfl
#align localization.rec_mk Localization.ndrec_mk
#align add_localization.rec_mk AddLocalization.ndrec_mk
/-- Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f a b : p`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
-- Porting note: the attribute `elab_as_elim` fails with `unexpected eliminator resulting type p`
-- @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
@[to_additive
"Non-dependent recursion principle for `AddLocalization`s: given elements `f a b : p`
for all `a b`, such that `r S (a, b) (c, d)` implies `f a b = f c d`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`."]
def liftOn {p : Sort u} (x : Localization S) (f : M → S → p)
(H : ∀ {a c : M} {b d : S}, r S (a, b) (c, d) → f a b = f c d) : p :=
rec f (fun h ↦ (by simpa only [eq_rec_constant] using H h)) x
#align localization.lift_on Localization.liftOn
#align add_localization.lift_on AddLocalization.liftOn
@[to_additive]
theorem liftOn_mk {p : Sort u} (f : M → S → p) (H) (a : M) (b : S) :
liftOn (mk a b) f H = f a b := rfl
#align localization.lift_on_mk Localization.liftOn_mk
#align add_localization.lift_on_mk AddLocalization.liftOn_mk
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem ind {p : Localization S → Prop} (H : ∀ y : M × S, p (mk y.1 y.2)) (x) : p x :=
rec (fun a b ↦ H (a, b)) (fun _ ↦ rfl) x
#align localization.ind Localization.ind
#align add_localization.ind AddLocalization.ind
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on {p : Localization S → Prop} (x) (H : ∀ y : M × S, p (mk y.1 y.2)) : p x :=
ind H x
#align localization.induction_on Localization.induction_on
#align add_localization.induction_on AddLocalization.induction_on
/-- Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f x y : p`
for all `x` and `y`, such that `r S x x'` and `r S y y'` implies `f x y = f x' y'`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`. -/
-- Porting note: the attribute `elab_as_elim` fails with `unexpected eliminator resulting type p`
-- @[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
@[to_additive
"Non-dependent recursion principle for localizations: given elements `f x y : p`
for all `x` and `y`, such that `r S x x'` and `r S y y'` implies `f x y = f x' y'`,
then `f` is defined on the whole `Localization S`."]
def liftOn₂ {p : Sort u} (x y : Localization S) (f : M → S → M → S → p)
(H : ∀ {a a' b b' c c' d d'}, r S (a, b) (a', b') → r S (c, d) (c', d') →
f a b c d = f a' b' c' d') : p :=
liftOn x (fun a b ↦ liftOn y (f a b) fun hy ↦ H ((r S).refl _) hy) fun hx ↦
induction_on y fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ H hx ((r S).refl _)
#align localization.lift_on₂ Localization.liftOn₂
#align add_localization.lift_on₂ AddLocalization.liftOn₂
@[to_additive]
theorem liftOn₂_mk {p : Sort*} (f : M → S → M → S → p) (H) (a c : M) (b d : S) :
liftOn₂ (mk a b) (mk c d) f H = f a b c d := rfl
#align localization.lift_on₂_mk Localization.liftOn₂_mk
#align add_localization.lift_on₂_mk AddLocalization.liftOn₂_mk
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on₂ {p : Localization S → Localization S → Prop} (x y)
(H : ∀ x y : M × S, p (mk x.1 x.2) (mk y.1 y.2)) : p x y :=
induction_on x fun x ↦ induction_on y <| H x
#align localization.induction_on₂ Localization.induction_on₂
#align add_localization.induction_on₂ AddLocalization.induction_on₂
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on₃ {p : Localization S → Localization S → Localization S → Prop} (x y z)
(H : ∀ x y z : M × S, p (mk x.1 x.2) (mk y.1 y.2) (mk z.1 z.2)) : p x y z :=
induction_on₂ x y fun x y ↦ induction_on z <| H x y
#align localization.induction_on₃ Localization.induction_on₃
#align add_localization.induction_on₃ AddLocalization.induction_on₃
@[to_additive]
theorem one_rel (y : S) : r S 1 (y, y) := fun _ hb ↦ hb y
#align localization.one_rel Localization.one_rel
#align add_localization.zero_rel AddLocalization.zero_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem r_of_eq {x y : M × S} (h : ↑y.2 * x.1 = ↑x.2 * y.1) : r S x y :=
r_iff_exists.2 ⟨1, by rw [h]⟩
#align localization.r_of_eq Localization.r_of_eq
#align add_localization.r_of_eq AddLocalization.r_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_self (a : S) : mk (a : M) a = 1 := by
symm
rw [← mk_one, mk_eq_mk_iff]
exact one_rel a
#align localization.mk_self Localization.mk_self
#align add_localization.mk_self AddLocalization.mk_self
section Scalar
variable {R R₁ R₂ : Type*}
/-- Scalar multiplication in a monoid localization is defined as `c • ⟨a, b⟩ = ⟨c • a, b⟩`. -/
protected irreducible_def smul [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] (c : R) (z : Localization S) :
Localization S :=
Localization.liftOn z (fun a b ↦ mk (c • a) b)
(fun {a a' b b'} h ↦ mk_eq_mk_iff.2 (by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := b
let ⟨b', hb'⟩ := b'
rw [r_eq_r'] at h ⊢
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := h
use t
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at ht ⊢
-- TODO: this definition should take `SMulCommClass R M M` instead of `IsScalarTower R M M` if
-- we ever want to generalize to the non-commutative case.
haveI : SMulCommClass R M M :=
⟨fun r m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_comm m₁, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
simp only [mul_smul_comm, ht]))
#align localization.smul Localization.smul
instance instSMulLocalization [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] : SMul R (Localization S) where
smul := Localization.smul
theorem smul_mk [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] (c : R) (a b) :
c • (mk a b : Localization S) = mk (c • a) b := by
simp only [HSMul.hSMul, instHSMul, SMul.smul, instSMulLocalization, Localization.smul]
show liftOn (mk a b) (fun a b => mk (c • a) b) _ = _
exact liftOn_mk (fun a b => mk (c • a) b) _ a b
#align localization.smul_mk Localization.smul_mk
instance [SMul R₁ M] [SMul R₂ M] [IsScalarTower R₁ M M] [IsScalarTower R₂ M M]
[SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ M] : SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (Localization S) where
smul_comm s t := Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_comm s t r]
instance [SMul R₁ M] [SMul R₂ M] [IsScalarTower R₁ M M] [IsScalarTower R₂ M M] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ M] : IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Localization S) where
smul_assoc s t := Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_assoc s t r]
instance smulCommClass_right {R : Type*} [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
SMulCommClass R (Localization S) (Localization S) where
smul_comm s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by
simp only [smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, mk_mul, mul_comm r₁, smul_mul_assoc]
#align localization.smul_comm_class_right Localization.smulCommClass_right
instance isScalarTower_right {R : Type*} [SMul R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
IsScalarTower R (Localization S) (Localization S) where
smul_assoc s :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, smul_eq_mul, mk_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
#align localization.is_scalar_tower_right Localization.isScalarTower_right
instance [SMul R M] [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsScalarTower R M M] [IsScalarTower Rᵐᵒᵖ M M]
[IsCentralScalar R M] : IsCentralScalar R (Localization S) where
op_smul_eq_smul s :=
Localization.ind <| Prod.rec fun r x ↦ by simp only [smul_mk, op_smul_eq_smul]
instance [Monoid R] [MulAction R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] : MulAction R (Localization S) where
one_smul :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, one_smul]
mul_smul s₁ s₂ :=
Localization.ind <|
Prod.rec <| by
intros
simp only [Localization.smul_mk, mul_smul]
instance [Monoid R] [MulDistribMulAction R M] [IsScalarTower R M M] :
MulDistribMulAction R (Localization S) where
smul_one s := by simp only [← Localization.mk_one, Localization.smul_mk, smul_one]
smul_mul s x y :=
Localization.induction_on₂ x y <|
Prod.rec fun r₁ x₁ ↦
Prod.rec fun r₂ x₂ ↦ by simp only [Localization.smul_mk, Localization.mk_mul, smul_mul']
end Scalar
end Localization
variable {S N}
namespace MonoidHom
/-- Makes a localization map from a `CommMonoid` hom satisfying the characteristic predicate. -/
@[to_additive
"Makes a localization map from an `AddCommMonoid` hom satisfying the characteristic predicate."]
def toLocalizationMap (f : M →* N) (H1 : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y))
(H2 : ∀ z, ∃ x : M × S, z * f x.2 = f x.1) (H3 : ∀ x y, f x = f y → ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = ↑c * y) :
Submonoid.LocalizationMap S N :=
{ f with
map_units' := H1
surj' := H2
exists_of_eq := H3 }
#align monoid_hom.to_localization_map MonoidHom.toLocalizationMap
#align add_monoid_hom.to_localization_map AddMonoidHom.toLocalizationMap
end MonoidHom
namespace Submonoid
namespace LocalizationMap
/-- Short for `toMonoidHom`; used to apply a localization map as a function. -/
@[to_additive "Short for `toAddMonoidHom`; used to apply a localization map as a function."]
abbrev toMap (f : LocalizationMap S N) := f.toMonoidHom
#align submonoid.localization_map.to_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.to_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext {f g : LocalizationMap S N} (h : ∀ x, f.toMap x = g.toMap x) : f = g := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, MonoidHom.mk.injEq]
exact OneHom.ext h
#align submonoid.localization_map.ext Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ext
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.ext AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff {f g : LocalizationMap S N} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f.toMap x = g.toMap x :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.ext_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.ext_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.ext_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.ext_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem toMap_injective : Function.Injective (@LocalizationMap.toMap _ _ S N _) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ ext <| DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h
#align submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective Submonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap_injective
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.to_map_injective AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.toMap_injective
@[to_additive]
theorem map_units (f : LocalizationMap S N) (y : S) : IsUnit (f.toMap y) :=
f.2 y
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_units Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_units
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_add_units AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_addUnits
@[to_additive]
theorem surj (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z : N) : ∃ x : M × S, z * f.toMap x.2 = f.toMap x.1 :=
f.3 z
#align submonoid.localization_map.surj Submonoid.LocalizationMap.surj
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.surj AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.surj
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, and `z w : N`, there exist `z' w' : M` and `d : S`
such that `f z' / f d = z` and `f w' / f d = w`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, and `z w : N`, there exist `z' w' : M` and `d : S`
such that `f z' - f d = z` and `f w' - f d = w`."]
theorem surj₂ (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z w : N) : ∃ z' w' : M, ∃ d : S,
(z * f.toMap d = f.toMap z') ∧ (w * f.toMap d = f.toMap w') := by
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := surj f z
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := surj f w
refine ⟨a.1 * b.2, a.2 * b.1, a.2 * b.2, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp_rw [mul_def, map_mul, ← ha]
exact (mul_assoc z _ _).symm
· simp_rw [mul_def, map_mul, ← hb]
exact mul_left_comm w _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_exists (f : LocalizationMap S N) {x y} :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * x = c * y := Iff.intro (f.4 x y)
fun ⟨c, h⟩ ↦ by
replace h := congr_arg f.toMap h
rw [map_mul, map_mul] at h
exact (f.map_units c).mul_right_inj.mp h
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_exists Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_exists AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_exists
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, a section function sending `z : N` to some
`(x, y) : M × S` such that `f x * (f y)⁻¹ = z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, a section function sending `z : N`
to some `(x, y) : M × S` such that `f x - f y = z`."]
noncomputable def sec (f : LocalizationMap S N) (z : N) : M × S := Classical.choose <| f.surj z
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec
@[to_additive]
theorem sec_spec {f : LocalizationMap S N} (z : N) :
z * f.toMap (f.sec z).2 = f.toMap (f.sec z).1 := Classical.choose_spec <| f.surj z
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem sec_spec' {f : LocalizationMap S N} (z : N) :
f.toMap (f.sec z).1 = f.toMap (f.sec z).2 * z := by rw [mul_comm, sec_spec]
#align submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.sec_spec' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.sec_spec'
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `w * (f y)⁻¹ = z ↔ w = f y * z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `w - f y = z ↔ w = f y + z`."]
theorem mul_inv_left {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) (y : S) (w z : N) :
w * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ = z ↔ w = f y * z := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact Units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg_left
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `z = w * (f y)⁻¹ ↔ z * f y = w`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `w, z : N` and `y ∈ S`, we have `z = w - f y ↔ z + f y = w`."]
theorem mul_inv_right {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) (y : S) (w z : N) :
z = w * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ ↔ z * f y = w := by
rw [eq_comm, mul_inv_left h, mul_comm, eq_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg_right
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all `x₁ x₂ : M` and `y₁, y₂ ∈ S`, we have
`f x₁ * (f y₁)⁻¹ = f x₂ * (f y₂)⁻¹ ↔ f (x₁ * y₂) = f (x₂ * y₁)`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `x₁ x₂ : M` and `y₁, y₂ ∈ S`, we have
`f x₁ - f y₁ = f x₂ - f y₂ ↔ f (x₁ + y₂) = f (x₂ + y₁)`."]
theorem mul_inv {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f x₁ * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y₁)⁻¹ =
f x₂ * (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y₂)⁻¹ ↔
f (x₁ * y₂) = f (x₂ * y₁) := by
rw [mul_inv_right h, mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f y₂), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left h, mul_comm x₂,
f.map_mul, f.map_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_inv Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_inv
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_neg AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_neg
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`y, z ∈ S`, we have `(f y)⁻¹ = (f z)⁻¹ → f y = f z`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `y, z ∈ S`, we have `- (f y) = - (f z) → f y = f z`."]
theorem inv_inj {f : M →* N} (hf : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {y z : S}
(h : (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf y)⁻¹ = (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf z)⁻¹) :
f y = f z := by
rw [← mul_one (f y), eq_comm, ← mul_inv_left hf y (f z) 1, h]
exact Units.inv_mul (IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) hf z)⁻¹
#align submonoid.localization_map.inv_inj Submonoid.LocalizationMap.inv_inj
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.neg_inj AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.neg_inj
/-- Given a MonoidHom `f : M →* N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that `f(S) ⊆ Nˣ`, for all
`y ∈ S`, `(f y)⁻¹` is unique. -/
@[to_additive
"Given an AddMonoidHom `f : M →+ N` and Submonoid `S ⊆ M` such that
`f(S) ⊆ AddUnits N`, for all `y ∈ S`, `- (f y)` is unique."]
theorem inv_unique {f : M →* N} (h : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (f y)) {y : S} {z : N} (H : f y * z = 1) :
(IsUnit.liftRight (f.restrict S) h y)⁻¹ = z := by
rw [← one_mul _⁻¹, Units.val_mul, mul_inv_left]
exact H.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.inv_unique Submonoid.LocalizationMap.inv_unique
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.neg_unique AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.neg_unique
variable (f : LocalizationMap S N)
@[to_additive]
theorem map_right_cancel {x y} {c : S} (h : f.toMap (c * x) = f.toMap (c * y)) :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y := by
rw [f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul] at h
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := f.map_units c
rw [← hu] at h
exact (Units.mul_right_inj u).1 h
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_right_cancel Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_right_cancel
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_right_cancel AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_right_cancel
@[to_additive]
theorem map_left_cancel {x y} {c : S} (h : f.toMap (x * c) = f.toMap (y * c)) :
f.toMap x = f.toMap y :=
f.map_right_cancel <| by rw [mul_comm _ x, mul_comm _ y, h]
#align submonoid.localization_map.map_left_cancel Submonoid.LocalizationMap.map_left_cancel
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.map_left_cancel AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.map_left_cancel
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N`, the surjection sending `(x, y) : M × S` to
`f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N`, the surjection sending `(x, y) : M × S`
to `f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def mk' (f : LocalizationMap S N) (x : M) (y : S) : N :=
f.toMap x * ↑(IsUnit.liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units y)⁻¹
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul (x₁ x₂ : M) (y₁ y₂ : S) : f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) (y₁ * y₂) = f.mk' x₁ y₁ * f.mk' x₂ y₂ :=
(mul_inv_left f.map_units _ _ _).2 <|
show _ = _ * (_ * _ * (_ * _)) by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right f.map_units, mul_assoc, mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ (f.toMap x₂), ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right f.map_units,
Submonoid.coe_mul, f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul]
ac_rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_one (x) : f.mk' x (1 : S) = f.toMap x := by
rw [mk', MonoidHom.map_one]
exact mul_one _
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_one Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_one
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_zero AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_zero
/-- Given a localization map `f : M →* N` for a submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `z : N` we have that if
`x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`, then `f x * (f y)⁻¹ = z`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `z : N`
we have that if `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`, then `f x - f y = z`."]
theorem mk'_sec (z : N) : f.mk' (f.sec z).1 (f.sec z).2 = z :=
show _ * _ = _ by rw [← sec_spec, mul_inv_left, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_sec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_sec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_sec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_sec
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_surjective (z : N) : ∃ (x : _) (y : S), f.mk' x y = z :=
⟨(f.sec z).1, (f.sec z).2, f.mk'_sec z⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_surjective Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_surjective
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_surjective AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_spec (x) (y : S) : f.mk' x y * f.toMap y = f.toMap x :=
show _ * _ * _ = _ by rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f.toMap y), ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_spec' (x) (y : S) : f.toMap y * f.mk' x y = f.toMap x := by rw [mul_comm, mk'_spec]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_spec' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_spec'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq {x} {y : S} {z} : z = f.mk' x y ↔ z * f.toMap y = f.toMap x :=
⟨fun H ↦ by rw [H, mk'_spec], fun H ↦ by erw [mul_inv_right, H]⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_mk'_iff_add_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_mk'_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul {x} {y : S} {z} : f.mk' x y = z ↔ f.toMap x = z * f.toMap y := by
rw [eq_comm, eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq, eq_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ f.toMap (y₂ * x₁) = f.toMap (y₁ * x₂) :=
⟨fun H ↦ by
rw [f.toMap.map_mul, f.toMap.map_mul, f.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.1 H,← mul_assoc, mk'_spec',
mul_comm ((toMap f) x₂) _],
fun H ↦ by
rw [mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul, mk', mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (f.toMap y₁), ← mul_assoc, ←
f.toMap.map_mul, mul_comm x₂, ← H, ← mul_comm x₁, f.toMap.map_mul,
mul_inv_right f.map_units]⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_eq' {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ f.toMap (x₁ * y₂) = f.toMap (x₂ * y₁) := by
simp only [f.mk'_eq_iff_eq, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_eq'
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : S} :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ ↔ ∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑b₂ * a₁) = c * (a₂ * b₁) :=
f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.trans <| f.eq_iff_exists
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq
@[to_additive]
protected theorem eq' {a₁ b₁} {a₂ b₂ : S} :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ ↔ Localization.r S (a₁, a₂) (b₁, b₂) := by
rw [f.eq, Localization.r_iff_exists]
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_iff_eq (g : LocalizationMap S P) {x y} : f.toMap x = f.toMap y ↔ g.toMap x = g.toMap y :=
f.eq_iff_exists.trans g.eq_iff_exists.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_iff_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_iff_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq (g : LocalizationMap S P) {x₁ x₂} {y₁ y₂ : S} :
f.mk' x₁ y₁ = f.mk' x₂ y₂ ↔ g.mk' x₁ y₁ = g.mk' x₂ y₂ :=
f.eq'.trans g.eq'.symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_iff_mk'_eq
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `x₁ : M` and `y₁ ∈ S`,
if `x₂ : M, y₂ ∈ S` are such that `f x₁ * (f y₁)⁻¹ * f y₂ = f x₂`, then there exists `c ∈ S`
such that `x₁ * y₂ * c = x₂ * y₁ * c`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, for all `x₁ : M`
and `y₁ ∈ S`, if `x₂ : M, y₂ ∈ S` are such that `(f x₁ - f y₁) + f y₂ = f x₂`, then there exists
`c ∈ S` such that `x₁ + y₂ + c = x₂ + y₁ + c`."]
theorem exists_of_sec_mk' (x) (y : S) :
∃ c : S, ↑c * (↑(f.sec <| f.mk' x y).2 * x) = c * (y * (f.sec <| f.mk' x y).1) :=
f.eq_iff_exists.1 <| f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.1 <| (mk'_sec _ _).symm
#align submonoid.localization_map.exists_of_sec_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_sec_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.exists_of_sec_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.exists_of_sec_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_eq {a₁ b₁ : M} {a₂ b₂ : S} (H : ↑a₂ * b₁ = ↑b₂ * a₁) :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ :=
f.mk'_eq_iff_eq.2 <| H ▸ rfl
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_eq' {a₁ b₁ : M} {a₂ b₂ : S} (H : b₁ * ↑a₂ = a₁ * ↑b₂) :
f.mk' a₁ a₂ = f.mk' b₁ b₂ :=
f.mk'_eq_of_eq <| by simpa only [mul_comm] using H
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_eq_of_eq' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_eq_of_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_cancel (a : M) (b c : S) :
f.mk' (a * c) (b * c) = f.mk' a b :=
mk'_eq_of_eq' f (by rw [Submonoid.coe_mul, mul_comm (b:M), mul_assoc])
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_eq_of_same {a b} {d : S} :
f.mk' a d = f.mk' b d ↔ ∃ c : S, c * a = c * b := by
rw [mk'_eq_iff_eq', map_mul, map_mul, ← eq_iff_exists f]
exact (map_units f d).mul_left_inj
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_self' (y : S) : f.mk' (y : M) y = 1 :=
show _ * _ = _ by rw [mul_inv_left, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_self (x) (H : x ∈ S) : f.mk' x ⟨x, H⟩ = 1 := mk'_self' f ⟨x, H⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_self AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul (x₁ x₂) (y : S) : f.toMap x₁ * f.mk' x₂ y = f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) y := by
rw [← mk'_one, ← mk'_mul, one_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_mk'_eq_mk'_of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul (x₁ x₂) (y : S) : f.mk' x₂ y * f.toMap x₁ = f.mk' (x₁ * x₂) y := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_eq_mk'_of_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_eq_mk'_of_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_eq_mk'_of_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' (x) (y : S) : f.toMap x * f.mk' 1 y = f.mk' x y := by
rw [mul_mk'_eq_mk'_of_mul, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mul_mk'_one_eq_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mul_mk'_one_eq_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.add_mk'_zero_eq_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.add_mk'_zero_eq_mk'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_right (x : M) (y : S) : f.mk' (x * y) y = f.toMap x := by
rw [← mul_mk'_one_eq_mk', f.toMap.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_mk'_one_eq_mk', mk'_self', mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_cancel_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_cancel_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_cancel_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mk'_mul_cancel_left (x) (y : S) : f.mk' ((y : M) * x) y = f.toMap x := by
rw [mul_comm, mk'_mul_cancel_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.mk'_mul_cancel_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_mul_cancel_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.mk'_add_cancel_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.mk'_add_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
theorem isUnit_comp (j : N →* P) (y : S) : IsUnit (j.comp f.toMap y) :=
⟨Units.map j <| IsUnit.liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units y,
show j _ = j _ from congr_arg j <| IsUnit.coe_liftRight (f.toMap.restrict S) f.map_units _⟩
#align submonoid.localization_map.is_unit_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.isUnit_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.is_add_unit_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.isAddUnit_comp
variable {g : M →* P}
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ Units P`, `f x = f y → g x = g y` for all `x y : M`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g(S) ⊆ AddUnits P`, `f x = f y → g x = g y`
for all `x y : M`."]
theorem eq_of_eq (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y)) {x y} (h : f.toMap x = f.toMap y) : g x = g y := by
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := f.eq_iff_exists.1 h
rw [← one_mul (g x), ← IsUnit.liftRight_inv_mul (g.restrict S) hg c]
show _ * g c * _ = _
rw [mul_assoc, ← g.map_mul, hc, mul_comm, mul_inv_left hg, g.map_mul]
#align submonoid.localization_map.eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.eq_of_eq
/-- Given `CommMonoid`s `M, P`, Localization maps `f : M →* N, k : P →* Q` for Submonoids
`S, T` respectively, and `g : M →* P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T`, `f x = f y` implies
`k (g x) = k (g y)`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given `AddCommMonoid`s `M, P`, Localization maps `f : M →+ N, k : P →+ Q` for Submonoids
`S, T` respectively, and `g : M →+ P` such that `g(S) ⊆ T`, `f x = f y`
implies `k (g x) = k (g y)`."]
theorem comp_eq_of_eq {T : Submonoid P} {Q : Type*} [CommMonoid Q] (hg : ∀ y : S, g y ∈ T)
(k : LocalizationMap T Q) {x y} (h : f.toMap x = f.toMap y) : k.toMap (g x) = k.toMap (g y) :=
f.eq_of_eq (fun y : S ↦ show IsUnit (k.toMap.comp g y) from k.map_units ⟨g y, hg y⟩) h
#align submonoid.localization_map.comp_eq_of_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.comp_eq_of_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.comp_eq_of_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.comp_eq_of_eq
variable (hg : ∀ y : S, IsUnit (g y))
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism induced from
`N` to `P` sending `z : N` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such that
`z = f x * (f y)⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a localization map `f : M →+ N` for a submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism
induced from `N` to `P` sending `z : N` to `g x - g y`, where `(x, y) : M × S` are such that
`z = f x - f y`."]
noncomputable def lift : N →* P where
toFun z := g (f.sec z).1 * (IsUnit.liftRight (g.restrict S) hg (f.sec z).2)⁻¹
map_one' := by rw [mul_inv_left, mul_one]; exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by rw [← sec_spec, one_mul])
map_mul' x y := by
dsimp only
rw [mul_inv_left hg, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right hg, mul_comm _ (g (f.sec y).1), ←
mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_right hg]
repeat rw [← g.map_mul]
exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by simp_rw [f.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec']; ac_rfl)
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of `CommMonoid`s
`g : M →* P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism induced from
`N` to `P` maps `f x * (f y)⁻¹` to `g x * (g y)⁻¹` for all `x : M, y ∈ S`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M` and a map of
`AddCommMonoid`s `g : M →+ P` such that `g y` is invertible for all `y : S`, the homomorphism
induced from `N` to `P` maps `f x - f y` to `g x - g y` for all `x : M, y ∈ S`."]
theorem lift_mk' (x y) : f.lift hg (f.mk' x y) = g x * (IsUnit.liftRight (g.restrict S) hg y)⁻¹ :=
(mul_inv hg).2 <|
f.eq_of_eq hg <| by
simp_rw [f.toMap.map_mul, sec_spec', mul_assoc, f.mk'_spec, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk' Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk' AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N, v : P`, we have
`f.lift hg z = v ↔ g x = g y * v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an
`AddCommMonoid` map `g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all
`z : N, v : P`, we have `f.lift hg z = v ↔ g x = g y + v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_spec (z v) : f.lift hg z = v ↔ g (f.sec z).1 = g (f.sec z).2 * v :=
mul_inv_left hg _ _ v
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N, v w : P`, we have
`f.lift hg z * w = v ↔ g x * w = g y * v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that
`z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid` map
`g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all
`z : N, v w : P`, we have `f.lift hg z + w = v ↔ g x + w = g y + v`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such
that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_spec_mul (z w v) : f.lift hg z * w = v ↔ g (f.sec z).1 * w = g (f.sec z).2 * v := by
erw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_left hg, mul_comm]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec_mul Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec_mul
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_spec_add AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_spec_add
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_mk'_spec (x v) (y : S) : f.lift hg (f.mk' x y) = v ↔ g x = g y * v := by
rw [f.lift_mk' hg]; exact mul_inv_left hg _ _ _
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk'_spec Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'_spec
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_mk'_spec AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mk'_spec
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`f.lift hg z * g y = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid`
map `g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`f.lift hg z + g y = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_mul_right (z) : f.lift hg z * g (f.sec z).2 = g (f.sec z).1 := by
erw [mul_assoc, IsUnit.liftRight_inv_mul, mul_one]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mul_right Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mul_right
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_add_right AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_add_right
/-- Given a Localization map `f : M →* N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if a `CommMonoid` map
`g : M →* P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →* P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`g y * f.lift hg z = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z * f y = f x`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a Localization map `f : M →+ N` for a Submonoid `S ⊆ M`, if an `AddCommMonoid` map
`g : M →+ P` induces a map `f.lift hg : N →+ P` then for all `z : N`, we have
`g y + f.lift hg z = g x`, where `x : M, y ∈ S` are such that `z + f y = f x`."]
theorem lift_mul_left (z) : g (f.sec z).2 * f.lift hg z = g (f.sec z).1 := by
rw [mul_comm, lift_mul_right]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_mul_left Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_mul_left
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_add_left AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_eq (x : M) : f.lift hg (f.toMap x) = g x := by
rw [lift_spec, ← g.map_mul]; exact f.eq_of_eq hg (by rw [sec_spec', f.toMap.map_mul])
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_eq_iff {x y : M × S} :
f.lift hg (f.mk' x.1 x.2) = f.lift hg (f.mk' y.1 y.2) ↔ g (x.1 * y.2) = g (y.1 * x.2) := by
rw [lift_mk', lift_mk', mul_inv hg]
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq_iff Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq_iff
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_eq_iff AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp : (f.lift hg).comp f.toMap = g := by ext; exact f.lift_eq hg _
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_of_comp (j : N →* P) : f.lift (f.isUnit_comp j) = j := by
ext
rw [lift_spec]
show j _ = j _ * _
erw [← j.map_mul, sec_spec']
#align submonoid.localization_map.lift_of_comp Submonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_of_comp
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.lift_of_comp AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.lift_of_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem epic_of_localizationMap {j k : N →* P} (h : ∀ a, j.comp f.toMap a = k.comp f.toMap a) :
j = k := by
rw [← f.lift_of_comp j, ← f.lift_of_comp k]
congr 1 with x; exact h x
#align submonoid.localization_map.epic_of_localization_map Submonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap
#align add_submonoid.localization_map.epic_of_localization_map AddSubmonoid.LocalizationMap.epic_of_localizationMap
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/MonoidLocalization.lean | 1,077 | 1,081 | theorem lift_unique {j : N →* P} (hj : ∀ x, j (f.toMap x) = g x) : f.lift hg = j := by |
ext
rw [lift_spec, ← hj, ← hj, ← j.map_mul]
apply congr_arg
rw [← sec_spec']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Canonical
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Set.List
import Mathlib.Init.Quot
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
#align_import data.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Multisets
These are implemented as the quotient of a list by permutations.
## Notation
We define the global infix notation `::ₘ` for `Multiset.cons`.
-/
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Multiset α` is the quotient of `List α` by list permutation. The result
is a type of finite sets with duplicates allowed. -/
def Multiset.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quotient (List.isSetoid α)
#align multiset Multiset
namespace Multiset
-- Porting note: new
/-- The quotient map from `List α` to `Multiset α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofList : List α → Multiset α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Multiset α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk (· ≈ ·) l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk Setoid.r l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe''
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
Quotient.eq
#align multiset.coe_eq_coe Multiset.coe_eq_coe
-- Porting note: new instance;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: move to better place
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ ≈ l₂) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (l₁ ~ l₂))
-- Porting note: `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂` was in parens which broke elaboration
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Multiset α)
| s₁, s₂ => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq
#align multiset.has_decidable_eq Multiset.decidableEq
/-- defines a size for a multiset by referring to the size of the underlying list -/
protected
def sizeOf [SizeOf α] (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
(Quot.liftOn s SizeOf.sizeOf) fun _ _ => Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
#align multiset.sizeof Multiset.sizeOf
instance [SizeOf α] : SizeOf (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sizeOf⟩
/-! ### Empty multiset -/
/-- `0 : Multiset α` is the empty set -/
protected def zero : Multiset α :=
@nil α
#align multiset.zero Multiset.zero
instance : Zero (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.zero⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedMultiset : Inhabited (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align multiset.inhabited_multiset Multiset.inhabitedMultiset
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Multiset α) where
default := 0
uniq := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, l⟩⟩; exacts [rfl, isEmptyElim a]
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : (@nil α : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_nil Multiset.coe_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.empty_eq_zero Multiset.empty_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_zero (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
Iff.trans coe_eq_coe perm_nil
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero Multiset.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l.isEmpty :=
Iff.trans (coe_eq_zero l) isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.symm
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_empty Multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
/-! ### `Multiset.cons` -/
/-- `cons a s` is the multiset which contains `s` plus one more instance of `a`. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (a :: l : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.cons a)
#align multiset.cons Multiset.cons
@[inherit_doc Multiset.cons]
infixr:67 " ::ₘ " => Multiset.cons
instance : Insert α (Multiset α) :=
⟨cons⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : insert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.insert_eq_cons Multiset.insert_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : List α) : (a ::ₘ l : Multiset α) = (a :: l : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_coe Multiset.cons_coe
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun l e =>
have : [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l := Quotient.exact e
singleton_perm_singleton.1 <| (perm_append_right_iff _).1 this,
congr_arg (· ::ₘ _)⟩
#align multiset.cons_inj_left Multiset.cons_inj_left
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) : ∀ {s t : Multiset α}, a ::ₘ s = a ::ₘ t ↔ s = t := by
rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩; simp
#align multiset.cons_inj_right Multiset.cons_inj_right
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {p : Multiset α → Prop} (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : ∀ s, p s := by
rintro ⟨l⟩; induction' l with _ _ ih <;> [exact empty; exact cons _ _ ih]
#align multiset.induction Multiset.induction
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.induction empty cons s
#align multiset.induction_on Multiset.induction_on
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ b ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Perm.swap _ _ _
#align multiset.cons_swap Multiset.cons_swap
section Rec
variable {C : Multiset α → Sort*}
/-- Dependent recursor on multisets.
TODO: should be @[recursor 6], but then the definition of `Multiset.pi` fails with a stack
overflow in `whnf`.
-/
protected
def rec (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b)))
(m : Multiset α) : C m :=
Quotient.hrecOn m (@List.rec α (fun l => C ⟦l⟧) C_0 fun a l b => C_cons a ⟦l⟧ b) fun l l' h =>
h.rec_heq
(fun hl _ ↦ by congr 1; exact Quot.sound hl)
(C_cons_heq _ _ ⟦_⟧ _)
#align multiset.rec Multiset.rec
/-- Companion to `Multiset.rec` with more convenient argument order. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected
def recOn (m : Multiset α) (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))) :
C m :=
Multiset.rec C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq m
#align multiset.rec_on Multiset.recOn
variable {C_0 : C 0} {C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m)}
{C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))}
@[simp]
theorem recOn_0 : @Multiset.recOn α C (0 : Multiset α) C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_0 Multiset.recOn_0
@[simp]
theorem recOn_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_cons a m (m.recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq) :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_cons Multiset.recOn_cons
end Rec
section Mem
/-- `a ∈ s` means that `a` has nonzero multiplicity in `s`. -/
def Mem (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun l₁ l₂ (e : l₁ ~ l₂) => propext <| e.mem_iff
#align multiset.mem Multiset.Mem
instance : Membership α (Multiset α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (l : Multiset α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.mem_coe Multiset.mem_coe
instance decidableMem [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l ↦ inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ l))
#align multiset.decidable_mem Multiset.decidableMem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.mem_cons
#align multiset.mem_cons Multiset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_cons_of_mem Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ∈ a ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align multiset.mem_cons_self Multiset.mem_cons_self
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ a ::ₘ s, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _ => List.forall_mem_cons
#align multiset.forall_mem_cons Multiset.forall_mem_cons
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → ∃ t, s = a ::ₘ t :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l (h : a ∈ l) =>
let ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩ := append_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ ⟨(l₁ ++ l₂ : List α), Quot.sound perm_middle⟩
#align multiset.exists_cons_of_mem Multiset.exists_cons_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (a : α) : a ∉ (0 : Multiset α) :=
List.not_mem_nil _
#align multiset.not_mem_zero Multiset.not_mem_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∉ s) → s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => by rw [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr H]; rfl
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : s = 0 ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ fun _ => not_mem_zero _, eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem⟩
#align multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_zero {s : Multiset α} : s ≠ 0 → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l hl =>
match l, hl with
| [], h => False.elim <| h rfl
| a :: l, _ => ⟨a, by simp⟩
#align multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
theorem empty_or_exists_mem (s : Multiset α) : s = 0 ∨ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
#align multiset.empty_or_exists_mem Multiset.empty_or_exists_mem
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_cons {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : 0 ≠ a ::ₘ m := fun h =>
have : a ∈ (0 : Multiset α) := h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
not_mem_zero _ this
#align multiset.zero_ne_cons Multiset.zero_ne_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_ne_zero {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ m ≠ 0 :=
zero_ne_cons.symm
#align multiset.cons_ne_zero Multiset.cons_ne_zero
theorem cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {as bs : Multiset α} :
a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ bs ↔ a = b ∧ as = bs ∨ a ≠ b ∧ ∃ cs, as = b ::ₘ cs ∧ bs = a ::ₘ cs := by
haveI : DecidableEq α := Classical.decEq α
constructor
· intro eq
by_cases h : a = b
· subst h
simp_all
· have : a ∈ b ::ₘ bs := eq ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
have : a ∈ bs := by simpa [h]
rcases exists_cons_of_mem this with ⟨cs, hcs⟩
simp only [h, hcs, false_and, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true, cons_inj_right, exists_eq_right',
true_and, false_or]
have : a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ cs := by simp [eq, hcs]
have : a ::ₘ as = a ::ₘ b ::ₘ cs := by rwa [cons_swap]
simpa using this
· intro h
rcases h with (⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨_, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩)
· simp [*]
· simp [*, cons_swap a b]
#align multiset.cons_eq_cons Multiset.cons_eq_cons
end Mem
/-! ### Singleton -/
instance : Singleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun a => a ::ₘ 0⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero (a : α) : a ::ₘ 0 = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_zero Multiset.cons_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : ([a] : Multiset α) = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_singleton Multiset.coe_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) ↔ b = a := by
simp only [← cons_zero, mem_cons, iff_self_iff, or_false_iff, not_mem_zero]
#align multiset.mem_singleton Multiset.mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) := by
rw [← cons_zero]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.mem_singleton_self Multiset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : ({a} : Multiset α) = {b} ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [← cons_zero]
exact cons_inj_left _
#align multiset.singleton_inj Multiset.singleton_inj
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : (l : Multiset α) = {a} ↔ l = [a] := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_eq_coe, List.perm_singleton]
#align multiset.coe_eq_singleton Multiset.coe_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_cons_iff {a b : α} (m : Multiset α) : {a} = b ::ₘ m ↔ a = b ∧ m = 0 := by
rw [← cons_zero, cons_eq_cons]
simp [eq_comm]
#align multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff Multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff
theorem pair_comm (x y : α) : ({x, y} : Multiset α) = {y, x} :=
cons_swap x y 0
#align multiset.pair_comm Multiset.pair_comm
/-! ### `Multiset.Subset` -/
section Subset
variable {s : Multiset α} {a : α}
/-- `s ⊆ t` is the lift of the list subset relation. It means that any
element with nonzero multiplicity in `s` has nonzero multiplicity in `t`,
but it does not imply that the multiplicity of `a` in `s` is less or equal than in `t`;
see `s ≤ t` for this relation. -/
protected def Subset (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t
#align multiset.subset Multiset.Subset
instance : HasSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.Subset⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance instIsNonstrictStrictOrder : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Multiset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) where
right_iff_left_not_left _ _ := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ⊆ l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_subset Multiset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Multiset α) : s ⊆ s := fun _ h => h
#align multiset.subset.refl Multiset.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.trans {s t u : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → t ⊆ u → s ⊆ u := fun h₁ h₂ _ m => h₂ (h₁ m)
#align multiset.subset.trans Multiset.Subset.trans
theorem subset_iff {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.subset_iff Multiset.subset_iff
theorem mem_of_subset {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
@h _
#align multiset.mem_of_subset Multiset.mem_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem zero_subset (s : Multiset α) : 0 ⊆ s := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
#align multiset.zero_subset Multiset.zero_subset
theorem subset_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ⊆ a ::ₘ s := fun _ => mem_cons_of_mem
#align multiset.subset_cons Multiset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons {s : Multiset α} {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ a ::ₘ s :=
⟨subset_cons _ _, fun h => ha <| h <| mem_cons_self _ _⟩
#align multiset.ssubset_cons Multiset.ssubset_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp [subset_iff, or_imp, forall_and]
#align multiset.cons_subset Multiset.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_cons {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → a ::ₘ s ⊆ a ::ₘ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => List.cons_subset_cons _
#align multiset.cons_subset_cons Multiset.cons_subset_cons
theorem eq_zero_of_subset_zero {s : Multiset α} (h : s ⊆ 0) : s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem fun _ hx ↦ not_mem_zero _ (h hx)
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero Multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero
@[simp] lemma subset_zero : s ⊆ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_subset_zero, fun xeq => xeq.symm ▸ Subset.refl 0⟩
#align multiset.subset_zero Multiset.subset_zero
@[simp] lemma zero_ssubset : 0 ⊂ s ↔ s ≠ 0 := by simp [ssubset_iff_subset_not_subset]
@[simp] lemma singleton_subset : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [subset_iff]
theorem induction_on' {p : Multiset α → Prop} (S : Multiset α) (h₁ : p 0)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Multiset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ hps hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := cons_subset.1 hs
h₂ hS sS (hps sS))
(Subset.refl S)
#align multiset.induction_on' Multiset.induction_on'
end Subset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out'
#align multiset.to_list Multiset.toList
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
#align multiset.coe_to_list Multiset.coe_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_nil Multiset.toList_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 :=
isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.trans toList_eq_nil
#align multiset.empty_to_list Multiset.empty_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
#align multiset.to_list_zero Multiset.toList_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 493 | 494 | theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by |
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Restrict
/-!
# Classes of measures
We introduce the following typeclasses for measures:
* `IsProbabilityMeasure μ`: `μ univ = 1`;
* `IsFiniteMeasure μ`: `μ univ < ∞`;
* `SigmaFinite μ`: there exists a countable collection of sets that cover `univ`
where `μ` is finite;
* `SFinite μ`: the measure `μ` can be written as a countable sum of finite measures;
* `IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ` : `∀ x, ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, μ s < ∞`;
* `NoAtoms μ` : `∀ x, μ {x} = 0`; possibly should be redefined as
`∀ s, 0 < μ s → ∃ t ⊆ s, 0 < μ t ∧ μ t < μ s`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open Set MeasureTheory Measure Filter Function MeasurableSpace ENNReal
variable {α β δ ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] {μ ν ν₁ ν₂: Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
section IsFiniteMeasure
/-- A measure `μ` is called finite if `μ univ < ∞`. -/
class IsFiniteMeasure (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
measure_univ_lt_top : μ univ < ∞
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure.measure_univ_lt_top MeasureTheory.IsFiniteMeasure.measure_univ_lt_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Typeclasses.lean | 41 | 44 | theorem not_isFiniteMeasure_iff : ¬IsFiniteMeasure μ ↔ μ Set.univ = ∞ := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => fun h' => h'.measure_univ_lt_top.ne h⟩
by_contra h'
exact h ⟨lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr h'⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.WithOne.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.InjSurj
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.WithZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.GroupWithZero.Synonym
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.ZeroLEOne
#align_import algebra.order.monoid.with_zero.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4dc134b97a3de65ef2ed881f3513d56260971562"
#align_import algebra.order.monoid.with_zero.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dad7ecf9a1feae63e6e49f07619b7087403fb8d4"
#align_import algebra.order.with_zero from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"655994e298904d7e5bbd1e18c95defd7b543eb94"
/-!
# Linearly ordered commutative groups and monoids with a zero element adjoined
This file sets up a special class of linearly ordered commutative monoids
that show up as the target of so-called “valuations” in algebraic number theory.
Usually, in the informal literature, these objects are constructed
by taking a linearly ordered commutative group Γ and formally adjoining a zero element: Γ ∪ {0}.
The disadvantage is that a type such as `NNReal` is not of that form,
whereas it is a very common target for valuations.
The solutions is to use a typeclass, and that is exactly what we do in this file.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
/-- A linearly ordered commutative monoid with a zero element. -/
class LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero (α : Type*) extends LinearOrderedCommMonoid α,
CommMonoidWithZero α where
/-- `0 ≤ 1` in any linearly ordered commutative monoid. -/
zero_le_one : (0 : α) ≤ 1
#align linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero
/-- A linearly ordered commutative group with a zero element. -/
class LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (α : Type*) extends LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero α,
CommGroupWithZero α
#align linear_ordered_comm_group_with_zero LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero.toZeroLeOneClass
[LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero α] : ZeroLEOneClass α :=
{ ‹LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero α› with }
#align linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero.to_zero_le_one_class LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero.toZeroLeOneClass
instance (priority := 100) canonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid.toZeroLeOneClass
[CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid α] [One α] : ZeroLEOneClass α :=
⟨zero_le 1⟩
#align canonically_ordered_add_monoid.to_zero_le_one_class canonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid.toZeroLeOneClass
section LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero
variable [LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero α] {a b c d x y z : α} {n : ℕ}
/-
The following facts are true more generally in a (linearly) ordered commutative monoid.
-/
/-- Pullback a `LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero` under an injective map.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev Function.Injective.linearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero {β : Type*} [Zero β] [One β] [Mul β]
[Pow β ℕ] [Sup β] [Inf β] (f : β → α) (hf : Function.Injective f) (zero : f 0 = 0)
(one : f 1 = 1) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) (npow : ∀ (x) (n : ℕ), f (x ^ n) = f x ^ n)
(hsup : ∀ x y, f (x ⊔ y) = max (f x) (f y)) (hinf : ∀ x y, f (x ⊓ y) = min (f x) (f y)) :
LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero β :=
{ LinearOrder.lift f hf hsup hinf, hf.orderedCommMonoid f one mul npow,
hf.commMonoidWithZero f zero one mul npow with
zero_le_one :=
show f 0 ≤ f 1 by simp only [zero, one, LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero.zero_le_one] }
#align function.injective.linear_ordered_comm_monoid_with_zero Function.Injective.linearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero
@[simp] lemma zero_le' : 0 ≤ a := by
simpa only [mul_zero, mul_one] using mul_le_mul_left' (zero_le_one' α) a
#align zero_le' zero_le'
@[simp]
theorem not_lt_zero' : ¬a < 0 :=
not_lt_of_le zero_le'
#align not_lt_zero' not_lt_zero'
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff : a ≤ 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ le_antisymm h zero_le', fun h ↦ h ▸ le_rfl⟩
#align le_zero_iff le_zero_iff
theorem zero_lt_iff : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
⟨ne_of_gt, fun h ↦ lt_of_le_of_ne zero_le' h.symm⟩
#align zero_lt_iff zero_lt_iff
theorem ne_zero_of_lt (h : b < a) : a ≠ 0 := fun h1 ↦ not_lt_zero' <| show b < 0 from h1 ▸ h
#align ne_zero_of_lt ne_zero_of_lt
instance instLinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTopAdditiveOrderDual :
LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop (Additive αᵒᵈ) :=
{ Additive.orderedAddCommMonoid, Additive.linearOrder with
top := (0 : α)
top_add' := fun a ↦ zero_mul (Additive.toMul a)
le_top := fun _ ↦ zero_le' }
#align additive.linear_ordered_add_comm_monoid_with_top instLinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTopAdditiveOrderDual
variable [NoZeroDivisors α]
lemma pow_pos_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < a ^ n ↔ 0 < a := by simp_rw [zero_lt_iff, pow_ne_zero_iff hn]
#align pow_pos_iff pow_pos_iff
end LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero
section LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero
variable [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero α] {a b c d : α} {m n : ℕ}
-- TODO: Do we really need the following two?
/-- Alias of `mul_le_one'` for unification. -/
theorem mul_le_one₀ (ha : a ≤ 1) (hb : b ≤ 1) : a * b ≤ 1 :=
mul_le_one' ha hb
#align mul_le_one₀ mul_le_one₀
/-- Alias of `one_le_mul'` for unification. -/
theorem one_le_mul₀ (ha : 1 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : 1 ≤ a * b :=
one_le_mul ha hb
#align one_le_mul₀ one_le_mul₀
theorem le_of_le_mul_right (h : c ≠ 0) (hab : a * c ≤ b * c) : a ≤ b := by
simpa only [mul_inv_cancel_right₀ h] using mul_le_mul_right' hab c⁻¹
#align le_of_le_mul_right le_of_le_mul_right
theorem le_mul_inv_of_mul_le (h : c ≠ 0) (hab : a * c ≤ b) : a ≤ b * c⁻¹ :=
le_of_le_mul_right h (by simpa [h] using hab)
#align le_mul_inv_of_mul_le le_mul_inv_of_mul_le
theorem mul_inv_le_of_le_mul (hab : a ≤ b * c) : a * c⁻¹ ≤ b := by
by_cases h : c = 0
· simp [h]
· exact le_of_le_mul_right h (by simpa [h] using hab)
#align mul_inv_le_of_le_mul mul_inv_le_of_le_mul
theorem inv_le_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ 1 ↔ 1 ≤ a :=
@inv_le_one' _ _ _ _ <| Units.mk0 a ha
#align inv_le_one₀ inv_le_one₀
theorem one_le_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ a⁻¹ ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
@one_le_inv' _ _ _ _ <| Units.mk0 a ha
#align one_le_inv₀ one_le_inv₀
theorem le_mul_inv_iff₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c ≤ b :=
⟨fun h ↦ inv_inv c ▸ mul_inv_le_of_le_mul h, le_mul_inv_of_mul_le hc⟩
#align le_mul_inv_iff₀ le_mul_inv_iff₀
theorem mul_inv_le_iff₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c⁻¹ ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b * c :=
⟨fun h ↦ inv_inv c ▸ le_mul_inv_of_mul_le (inv_ne_zero hc) h, mul_inv_le_of_le_mul⟩
#align mul_inv_le_iff₀ mul_inv_le_iff₀
theorem div_le_div₀ (a b c d : α) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hd : d ≠ 0) :
a * b⁻¹ ≤ c * d⁻¹ ↔ a * d ≤ c * b := by
rw [mul_inv_le_iff₀ hb, mul_right_comm, le_mul_inv_iff₀ hd]
#align div_le_div₀ div_le_div₀
@[simp]
theorem Units.zero_lt (u : αˣ) : (0 : α) < u :=
zero_lt_iff.2 <| u.ne_zero
#align units.zero_lt Units.zero_lt
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le₀ (hab : a ≤ b) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hcd : c < d) : a * c < b * d :=
have hd : d ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_lt hcd
if ha : a = 0 then by
rw [ha, zero_mul, zero_lt_iff]
exact mul_ne_zero hb hd
else
if hc : c = 0 then by
rw [hc, mul_zero, zero_lt_iff]
exact mul_ne_zero hb hd
else
show Units.mk0 a ha * Units.mk0 c hc < Units.mk0 b hb * Units.mk0 d hd from
mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hab hcd
#align mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le₀ mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le₀
theorem mul_lt_mul₀ (hab : a < b) (hcd : c < d) : a * c < b * d :=
mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le₀ hab.le (ne_zero_of_lt hab) hcd
#align mul_lt_mul₀ mul_lt_mul₀
theorem mul_inv_lt_of_lt_mul₀ (h : a < b * c) : a * c⁻¹ < b := by
contrapose! h
simpa only [inv_inv] using mul_inv_le_of_le_mul h
#align mul_inv_lt_of_lt_mul₀ mul_inv_lt_of_lt_mul₀
theorem inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul₀ (h : a < b * c) : b⁻¹ * a < c := by
rw [mul_comm] at *
exact mul_inv_lt_of_lt_mul₀ h
#align inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul₀ inv_mul_lt_of_lt_mul₀
theorem mul_lt_right₀ (c : α) (h : a < b) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c < b * c := by
contrapose! h
exact le_of_le_mul_right hc h
#align mul_lt_right₀ mul_lt_right₀
theorem inv_lt_one₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ < 1 ↔ 1 < a :=
@inv_lt_one' _ _ _ _ <| Units.mk0 a ha
theorem one_lt_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : 1 < a⁻¹ ↔ a < 1 :=
@one_lt_inv' _ _ _ _ <| Units.mk0 a ha
theorem inv_lt_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ < b⁻¹ ↔ b < a :=
show (Units.mk0 a ha)⁻¹ < (Units.mk0 b hb)⁻¹ ↔ Units.mk0 b hb < Units.mk0 a ha from
have : CovariantClass αˣ αˣ (· * ·) (· < ·) :=
IsLeftCancelMul.covariant_mul_lt_of_covariant_mul_le αˣ
inv_lt_inv_iff
#align inv_lt_inv₀ inv_lt_inv₀
theorem inv_le_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ ≤ b⁻¹ ↔ b ≤ a :=
show (Units.mk0 a ha)⁻¹ ≤ (Units.mk0 b hb)⁻¹ ↔ Units.mk0 b hb ≤ Units.mk0 a ha from
inv_le_inv_iff
#align inv_le_inv₀ inv_le_inv₀
theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_le₀ (h : a * b < c * d) (hc : 0 < c) (hh : c ≤ a) : b < d := by
have ha : a ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt (lt_of_lt_of_le hc hh)
simp_rw [← inv_le_inv₀ ha (ne_of_gt hc)] at hh
have := mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le₀ hh (inv_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hc)) h
simpa [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ ha, inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (ne_of_gt hc)] using this
#align lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_le₀ lt_of_mul_lt_mul_of_le₀
theorem mul_le_mul_right₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a * c ≤ b * c ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨le_of_le_mul_right hc, fun hab ↦ mul_le_mul_right' hab _⟩
#align mul_le_mul_right₀ mul_le_mul_right₀
theorem mul_le_mul_left₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c := by
simp only [mul_comm a]
exact mul_le_mul_right₀ ha
#align mul_le_mul_left₀ mul_le_mul_left₀
theorem div_le_div_right₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_le_mul_right₀ (inv_ne_zero hc)]
#align div_le_div_right₀ div_le_div_right₀
theorem div_le_div_left₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_le_mul_left₀ ha, inv_le_inv₀ hb hc]
#align div_le_div_left₀ div_le_div_left₀
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/GroupWithZero/Canonical.lean | 243 | 244 | theorem le_div_iff₀ (hc : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ a * c ≤ b := by |
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, le_mul_inv_iff₀ hc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
/-!
# Bicategories
In this file we define typeclass for bicategories.
A bicategory `B` consists of
* objects `a : B`,
* 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`, and
* 2-morphisms `η : f ⟶ g` between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`.
We use `u`, `v`, and `w` as the universe variables for objects, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms,
respectively.
A typeclass for bicategories extends `CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct` typeclass. This means that
we have
* a composition `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c` for each 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c`, and
* an identity `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a` for each object `a : B`.
For each object `a b : B`, the collection of 1-morphisms `a ⟶ b` has a category structure. The
2-morphisms in the bicategory are implemented as the morphisms in this family of categories.
The composition of 1-morphisms is in fact an object part of a functor
`(a ⟶ b) ⥤ (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. The definition of bicategories in this file does not
require this functor directly. Instead, it requires the whiskering functions. For a 1-morphism
`f : a ⟶ b` and a 2-morphism `η : g ⟶ h` between 1-morphisms `g h : b ⟶ c`, there is a
2-morphism `whiskerLeft f η : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h`. Similarly, for a 2-morphism `η : f ⟶ g`
between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` and a 1-morphism `f : b ⟶ c`, there is a 2-morphism
`whiskerRight η h : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h`. These satisfy the exchange law
`whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ`,
which is required as an axiom in the definition here.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- In a bicategory, we can compose the 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c` to obtain
a 1-morphism `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c`. This composition does not need to be strictly associative,
but there is a specified associator, `α_ f g h : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ (g ≫ h)`.
There is an identity 1-morphism `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a`, with specified left and right unitor
isomorphisms `λ_ f : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` and `ρ_ f : f ≫ 𝟙 a ≅ f`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bicategory.
-/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
/-!
### Simp-normal form for 2-morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any 2-morphisms into simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is also useful when applying (forthcoming)
`coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of 2-morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of 2-morphisms like `η₁ ≫ η₂ ≫ η₃ ≫ η₄ ≫ η₅` such that each `ηᵢ` is
either a structural 2-morphisms (2-morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural 2-morphisms, and
2. each non-structural 2-morphism in the composition is of the form `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅`,
where each `fᵢ` is a 1-morphism that is not the identity or a composite and `η` is a
non-structural 2-morphisms that is also not the identity or a composite.
Note that `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅` is actually `f₁ ◁ (f₂ ◁ (f₃ ◁ ((η ▷ f₄) ▷ f₅)))`.
-/
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
/-
The following simp attributes are put in order to rewrite any 2-morphisms into normal forms. There
are associators and unitors in the RHS in the several simp lemmas here (e.g. `id_whiskerLeft`),
which at first glance look more complicated than the LHS, but they will be eventually reduced by
the pentagon or the triangle identities, and more generally, (forthcoming) `coherence` tactic.
-/
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.hom_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_hom_whiskerRight
/-- The left whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeftIso
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerLeft
/-- The right whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRightIso
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h ≫ (α_ f' g h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ η ▷ g ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_comp_symm {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
(f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ η ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_middle CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_middle
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_middle CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_middle
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
(f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ g ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_right
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_right
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_whiskerLeft_symm (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom = (λ_ f).hom ≫ η := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (λ_ g).inv = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_inv_naturality
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ≫ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor_inv_naturality
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id_symm
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : 𝟙 a ◁ η = 𝟙 a ◁ θ ↔ η = θ := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iff CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_iff
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 415 | 415 | theorem whiskerRight_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : η ▷ 𝟙 b = θ ▷ 𝟙 b ↔ η = θ := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.fold from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"446eb51ce0a90f8385f260d2b52e760e2004246b"
/-!
# Recursive computation rules for the Clifford algebra
This file provides API for a special case `CliffordAlgebra.foldr` of the universal property
`CliffordAlgebra.lift` with `A = Module.End R N` for some arbitrary module `N`. This specialization
resembles the `list.foldr` operation, allowing a bilinear map to be "folded" along the generators.
For convenience, this file also provides `CliffordAlgebra.foldl`, implemented via
`CliffordAlgebra.reverse`
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.foldr`: a computation rule for building linear maps out of the clifford
algebra starting on the right, analogous to using `list.foldr` on the generators.
* `CliffordAlgebra.foldl`: a computation rule for building linear maps out of the clifford
algebra starting on the left, analogous to using `list.foldl` on the generators.
## Main statements
* `CliffordAlgebra.right_induction`: an induction rule that adds generators from the right.
* `CliffordAlgebra.left_induction`: an induction rule that adds generators from the left.
-/
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R M N : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup N]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section Foldr
/-- Fold a bilinear map along the generators of a term of the clifford algebra, with the rule
given by `foldr Q f hf n (ι Q m * x) = f m (foldr Q f hf n x)`.
For example, `foldr f hf n (r • ι R u + ι R v * ι R w) = r • f u n + f v (f w n)`. -/
def foldr (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf : ∀ m x, f m (f m x) = Q m • x) :
N →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] N :=
(CliffordAlgebra.lift Q ⟨f, fun v => LinearMap.ext <| hf v⟩).toLinearMap.flip
#align clifford_algebra.foldr CliffordAlgebra.foldr
@[simp]
theorem foldr_ι (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (m : M) : foldr Q f hf n (ι Q m) = f m n :=
LinearMap.congr_fun (lift_ι_apply _ _ _) n
#align clifford_algebra.foldr_ι CliffordAlgebra.foldr_ι
@[simp]
theorem foldr_algebraMap (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (r : R) :
foldr Q f hf n (algebraMap R _ r) = r • n :=
LinearMap.congr_fun (AlgHom.commutes _ r) n
#align clifford_algebra.foldr_algebra_map CliffordAlgebra.foldr_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem foldr_one (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) : foldr Q f hf n 1 = n :=
LinearMap.congr_fun (AlgHom.map_one _) n
#align clifford_algebra.foldr_one CliffordAlgebra.foldr_one
@[simp]
theorem foldr_mul (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (a b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
foldr Q f hf n (a * b) = foldr Q f hf (foldr Q f hf n b) a :=
LinearMap.congr_fun (AlgHom.map_mul _ _ _) n
#align clifford_algebra.foldr_mul CliffordAlgebra.foldr_mul
/-- This lemma demonstrates the origin of the `foldr` name. -/
theorem foldr_prod_map_ι (l : List M) (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) :
foldr Q f hf n (l.map <| ι Q).prod = List.foldr (fun m n => f m n) n l := by
induction' l with hd tl ih
· rw [List.map_nil, List.prod_nil, List.foldr_nil, foldr_one]
· rw [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, List.foldr_cons, foldr_mul, foldr_ι, ih]
#align clifford_algebra.foldr_prod_map_ι CliffordAlgebra.foldr_prod_map_ι
end Foldr
section Foldl
/-- Fold a bilinear map along the generators of a term of the clifford algebra, with the rule
given by `foldl Q f hf n (ι Q m * x) = f m (foldl Q f hf n x)`.
For example, `foldl f hf n (r • ι R u + ι R v * ι R w) = r • f u n + f v (f w n)`. -/
def foldl (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf : ∀ m x, f m (f m x) = Q m • x) :
N →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] N :=
LinearMap.compl₂ (foldr Q f hf) reverse
#align clifford_algebra.foldl CliffordAlgebra.foldl
@[simp]
theorem foldl_reverse (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
foldl Q f hf n (reverse x) = foldr Q f hf n x :=
DFunLike.congr_arg (foldr Q f hf n) <| reverse_reverse _
#align clifford_algebra.foldl_reverse CliffordAlgebra.foldl_reverse
@[simp]
theorem foldr_reverse (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
foldr Q f hf n (reverse x) = foldl Q f hf n x :=
rfl
#align clifford_algebra.foldr_reverse CliffordAlgebra.foldr_reverse
@[simp]
theorem foldl_ι (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (m : M) : foldl Q f hf n (ι Q m) = f m n := by
rw [← foldr_reverse, reverse_ι, foldr_ι]
#align clifford_algebra.foldl_ι CliffordAlgebra.foldl_ι
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Fold.lean | 115 | 117 | theorem foldl_algebraMap (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] N) (hf) (n : N) (r : R) :
foldl Q f hf n (algebraMap R _ r) = r • n := by |
rw [← foldr_reverse, reverse.commutes, foldr_algebraMap]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Supported
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Truncated
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.mul_coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Leading terms of Witt vector multiplication
The goal of this file is to study the leading terms of the formula for the `n+1`st coefficient
of a product of Witt vectors `x` and `y` over a ring of characteristic `p`.
We aim to isolate the `n+1`st coefficients of `x` and `y`, and express the rest of the product
in terms of a function of the lower coefficients.
For most of this file we work with terms of type `MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ`.
We will eventually evaluate them in `k`, but first we must take care of a calculation
that needs to happen in characteristic 0.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.nth_mul_coeff`: expresses the coefficient of a product of Witt vectors
in terms of the previous coefficients of the multiplicands.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace WittVector
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
variable {k : Type*} [CommRing k]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
-- Porting note: new notation
local notation "𝕄" => MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ
open Finset MvPolynomial
/--
```
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val) *
(∑ i ∈ range n, (y.coeff i)^(p^(n-i)) * p^i.val)
```
-/
def wittPolyProd (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) *
rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod WittVector.wittPolyProd
theorem wittPolyProd_vars (n : ℕ) : (wittPolyProd p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [wittPolyProd]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_rename _ _) ?_
simp [wittPolynomial_vars, image_subset_iff]
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_vars WittVector.wittPolyProd_vars
/-- The "remainder term" of `WittVector.wittPolyProd`. See `mul_polyOfInterest_aux2`. -/
def wittPolyProdRemainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
∑ i ∈ range n, (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i)
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_remainder WittVector.wittPolyProdRemainder
theorem wittPolyProdRemainder_vars (n : ℕ) :
(wittPolyProdRemainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range n := by
rw [wittPolyProdRemainder]
refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
have : (p : 𝕄) = C (p : ℤ) := by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast]
rw [this, vars_C]
apply empty_subset
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
apply Subset.trans (wittMul_vars _ _)
apply product_subset_product (Subset.refl _)
simp only [mem_range, range_subset] at hx ⊢
exact hx
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_remainder_vars WittVector.wittPolyProdRemainder_vars
/-- `remainder p n` represents the remainder term from `mul_polyOfInterest_aux3`.
`wittPolyProd p (n+1)` will have variables up to `n+1`,
but `remainder` will only have variables up to `n`.
-/
def remainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
(∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 0)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))) *
∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 1)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))
#align witt_vector.remainder WittVector.remainder
theorem remainder_vars (n : ℕ) : (remainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [remainder]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
rw [rename_monomial, vars_monomial, Finsupp.mapDomain_single]
· apply Subset.trans Finsupp.support_single_subset
simpa using mem_range.mp hx
· apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
#align witt_vector.remainder_vars WittVector.remainder_vars
/-- This is the polynomial whose degree we want to get a handle on. -/
def polyOfInterest (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1))
#align witt_vector.poly_of_interest WittVector.polyOfInterest
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i) = wittPolyProd p n := by
simp only [wittPolyProd]
convert wittStructureInt_prop p (X (0 : Fin 2) * X 1) n using 1
· simp only [wittPolynomial, wittMul]
rw [AlgHom.map_sum]
congr 1 with i
congr 1
have hsupp : (Finsupp.single i (p ^ (n - i))).support = {i} := by
rw [Finsupp.support_eq_singleton]
simp only [and_true_iff, Finsupp.single_eq_same, eq_self_iff_true, Ne]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero
simp only [bind₁_monomial, hsupp, Int.cast_natCast, prod_singleton, eq_intCast,
Finsupp.single_eq_same, C_pow, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, true_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true,
Int.cast_pow]
· simp only [map_mul, bind₁_X_right]
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux1 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux1
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux2 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ n * wittMul p n + wittPolyProdRemainder p n = wittPolyProd p n := by
convert mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 p n
rw [sum_range_succ, add_comm, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, pow_one]
rfl
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux2 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux2
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 (n : ℕ) : wittPolyProd p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
remainder p n := by
-- a useful auxiliary fact
have mvpz : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = MvPolynomial.C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
-- Porting note: the original proof applies `sum_range_succ` through a non-`conv` rewrite,
-- but this does not work in Lean 4; the whole proof also times out very badly. The proof has been
-- nearly totally rewritten here and now finishes quite fast.
rw [wittPolyProd, wittPolynomial, AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_sum]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_lhs =>
arg 2
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
simp only [add_mul, mul_add]
rw [add_comm _ (remainder p n)]
simp only [add_assoc]
apply congrArg (Add.add _)
ring
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux3 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux3
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * wittMul p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1)) := by
rw [← add_sub_assoc, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, mul_polyOfInterest_aux2]
exact mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 _ _
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux4 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux4
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux5 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * polyOfInterest p n = remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1) := by
simp only [polyOfInterest, mul_sub, mul_add, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
rw [mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 p n]
ring
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux5 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux5
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_vars (n : ℕ) :
((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * polyOfInterest p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [mul_polyOfInterest_aux5]
apply Subset.trans (vars_sub_subset _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply remainder_vars
· apply wittPolyProdRemainder_vars
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_vars WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_vars
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/MulCoeff.lean | 205 | 212 | theorem polyOfInterest_vars_eq (n : ℕ) : (polyOfInterest p n).vars =
((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * (wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)))).vars := by |
have : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
rw [polyOfInterest, this, vars_C_mul]
apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 508 | 511 | theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by |
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Antoine Labelle. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.FdRep
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Trace
import Mathlib.RepresentationTheory.Invariants
#align_import representation_theory.character from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"55b3f8206b8596db8bb1804d8a92814a0b6670c9"
/-!
# Characters of representations
This file introduces characters of representation and proves basic lemmas about how characters
behave under various operations on representations.
A key result is the orthogonality of characters for irreducible representations of finite group
over an algebraically closed field whose characteristic doesn't divide the order of the group. It
is the theorem `char_orthonormal`
# Implementation notes
Irreducible representations are implemented categorically, using the `Simple` class defined in
`Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Simple`
# TODO
* Once we have the monoidal closed structure on `FdRep k G` and a better API for the rigid
structure, `char_dual` and `char_linHom` should probably be stated in terms of `Vᘁ` and `ihom V W`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open CategoryTheory LinearMap CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory Representation FiniteDimensional
variable {k : Type u} [Field k]
namespace FdRep
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `FdRep`
section Monoid
variable {G : Type u} [Monoid G]
/-- The character of a representation `V : FdRep k G` is the function associating to `g : G` the
trace of the linear map `V.ρ g`. -/
def character (V : FdRep k G) (g : G) :=
LinearMap.trace k V (V.ρ g)
#align fdRep.character FdRep.character
theorem char_mul_comm (V : FdRep k G) (g : G) (h : G) :
V.character (h * g) = V.character (g * h) := by simp only [trace_mul_comm, character, map_mul]
#align fdRep.char_mul_comm FdRep.char_mul_comm
@[simp]
theorem char_one (V : FdRep k G) : V.character 1 = FiniteDimensional.finrank k V := by
simp only [character, map_one, trace_one]
#align fdRep.char_one FdRep.char_one
/-- The character is multiplicative under the tensor product. -/
theorem char_tensor (V W : FdRep k G) : (V ⊗ W).character = V.character * W.character := by
ext g; convert trace_tensorProduct' (V.ρ g) (W.ρ g)
#align fdRep.char_tensor FdRep.char_tensor
-- Porting note: adding variant of `char_tensor` to make the simp-set confluent
@[simp]
theorem char_tensor' (V W : FdRep k G) :
character (Action.FunctorCategoryEquivalence.inverse.obj
(Action.FunctorCategoryEquivalence.functor.obj V ⊗
Action.FunctorCategoryEquivalence.functor.obj W)) = V.character * W.character := by
simp [← char_tensor]
/-- The character of isomorphic representations is the same. -/
theorem char_iso {V W : FdRep k G} (i : V ≅ W) : V.character = W.character := by
ext g; simp only [character, FdRep.Iso.conj_ρ i]; exact (trace_conj' (V.ρ g) _).symm
#align fdRep.char_iso FdRep.char_iso
end Monoid
section Group
variable {G : Type u} [Group G]
/-- The character of a representation is constant on conjugacy classes. -/
@[simp]
theorem char_conj (V : FdRep k G) (g : G) (h : G) : V.character (h * g * h⁻¹) = V.character g := by
rw [char_mul_comm, inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align fdRep.char_conj FdRep.char_conj
@[simp]
theorem char_dual (V : FdRep k G) (g : G) : (of (dual V.ρ)).character g = V.character g⁻¹ :=
trace_transpose' (V.ρ g⁻¹)
#align fdRep.char_dual FdRep.char_dual
@[simp]
theorem char_linHom (V W : FdRep k G) (g : G) :
(of (linHom V.ρ W.ρ)).character g = V.character g⁻¹ * W.character g := by
rw [← char_iso (dualTensorIsoLinHom _ _), char_tensor, Pi.mul_apply, char_dual]
#align fdRep.char_lin_hom FdRep.char_linHom
variable [Fintype G] [Invertible (Fintype.card G : k)]
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Character.lean | 106 | 109 | theorem average_char_eq_finrank_invariants (V : FdRep k G) :
⅟ (Fintype.card G : k) • ∑ g : G, V.character g = finrank k (invariants V.ρ) := by |
erw [← (isProj_averageMap V.ρ).trace] -- Porting note: Changed `rw` to `erw`
simp [character, GroupAlgebra.average, _root_.map_sum]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Oleksandr Manzyuk
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Bicategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Equalizers
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.Bimod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4698e35ca56a0d4fa53aa5639c3364e0a77f4eba"
/-!
# The category of bimodule objects over a pair of monoid objects.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C]
section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable [HasCoequalizers C]
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
theorem id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc {W X Y Z : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Z ⊗ Y ⟶ W)
(wh : (Z ◁ f) ≫ h = (Z ◁ g) ≫ h) :
(Z ◁ coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft Z) f g).inv ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc (tensorLeft Z) f g h wh
#align id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc
theorem id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : Z ⊗ X ⟶ X') (q : Z ⊗ Y ⟶ Y') (wf : (Z ◁ f) ≫ q = p ≫ f')
(wg : (Z ◁ g) ≫ q = p ≫ g') (h : Y' ⟶ Z') (wh : f' ≫ h = g' ≫ h) :
(Z ◁ coequalizer.π f g) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft Z) f g).inv ≫
colimMap (parallelPairHom (Z ◁ f) (Z ◁ g) f' g' p q wf wg) ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
q ≫ h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc (tensorLeft Z) f g f' g' p q wf wg h wh
#align id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colim_map_desc id_tensor_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc
end
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorRight X)]
theorem π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc {W X Y Z : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⊗ Z ⟶ W)
(wh : (f ▷ Z) ≫ h = (g ▷ Z) ≫ h) :
(coequalizer.π f g ▷ Z) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorRight Z) f g).inv ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc (tensorRight Z) f g h wh
#align π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_desc
theorem π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y)
(f' g' : X' ⟶ Y') (p : X ⊗ Z ⟶ X') (q : Y ⊗ Z ⟶ Y') (wf : (f ▷ Z) ≫ q = p ≫ f')
(wg : (g ▷ Z) ≫ q = p ≫ g') (h : Y' ⟶ Z') (wh : f' ≫ h = g' ≫ h) :
(coequalizer.π f g ▷ Z) ≫
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorRight Z) f g).inv ≫
colimMap (parallelPairHom (f ▷ Z) (g ▷ Z) f' g' p q wf wg) ≫ coequalizer.desc h wh =
q ≫ h :=
map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc (tensorRight Z) f g f' g' p q wf wg h wh
#align π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colim_map_desc π_tensor_id_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap_desc
end
end
/-- A bimodule object for a pair of monoid objects, all internal to some monoidal category. -/
structure Bimod (A B : Mon_ C) where
X : C
actLeft : A.X ⊗ X ⟶ X
one_actLeft : (A.one ▷ X) ≫ actLeft = (λ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
left_assoc :
(A.mul ▷ X) ≫ actLeft = (α_ A.X A.X X).hom ≫ (A.X ◁ actLeft) ≫ actLeft := by aesop_cat
actRight : X ⊗ B.X ⟶ X
actRight_one : (X ◁ B.one) ≫ actRight = (ρ_ X).hom := by aesop_cat
right_assoc :
(X ◁ B.mul) ≫ actRight = (α_ X B.X B.X).inv ≫ (actRight ▷ B.X) ≫ actRight := by
aesop_cat
middle_assoc :
(actLeft ▷ B.X) ≫ actRight = (α_ A.X X B.X).hom ≫ (A.X ◁ actRight) ≫ actLeft := by
aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod Bimod
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Bimod.one_actLeft Bimod.actRight_one Bimod.left_assoc
Bimod.right_assoc Bimod.middle_assoc
namespace Bimod
variable {A B : Mon_ C} (M : Bimod A B)
/-- A morphism of bimodule objects. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (M N : Bimod A B) where
hom : M.X ⟶ N.X
left_act_hom : M.actLeft ≫ hom = (A.X ◁ hom) ≫ N.actLeft := by aesop_cat
right_act_hom : M.actRight ≫ hom = (hom ▷ B.X) ≫ N.actRight := by aesop_cat
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.hom Bimod.Hom
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Hom.left_act_hom Hom.right_act_hom
/-- The identity morphism on a bimodule object. -/
@[simps]
def id' (M : Bimod A B) : Hom M M where hom := 𝟙 M.X
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.id' Bimod.id'
instance homInhabited (M : Bimod A B) : Inhabited (Hom M M) :=
⟨id' M⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.hom_inhabited Bimod.homInhabited
/-- Composition of bimodule object morphisms. -/
@[simps]
def comp {M N O : Bimod A B} (f : Hom M N) (g : Hom N O) : Hom M O where hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.comp Bimod.comp
instance : Category (Bimod A B) where
Hom M N := Hom M N
id := id'
comp f g := comp f g
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
lemma hom_ext {M N : Bimod A B} (f g : M ⟶ N) (h : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g :=
Hom.ext _ _ h
@[simp]
theorem id_hom' (M : Bimod A B) : (𝟙 M : Hom M M).hom = 𝟙 M.X :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.id_hom' Bimod.id_hom'
@[simp]
theorem comp_hom' {M N K : Bimod A B} (f : M ⟶ N) (g : N ⟶ K) :
(f ≫ g : Hom M K).hom = f.hom ≫ g.hom :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.comp_hom' Bimod.comp_hom'
/-- Construct an isomorphism of bimodules by giving an isomorphism between the underlying objects
and checking compatibility with left and right actions only in the forward direction.
-/
@[simps]
def isoOfIso {X Y : Mon_ C} {P Q : Bimod X Y} (f : P.X ≅ Q.X)
(f_left_act_hom : P.actLeft ≫ f.hom = (X.X ◁ f.hom) ≫ Q.actLeft)
(f_right_act_hom : P.actRight ≫ f.hom = (f.hom ▷ Y.X) ≫ Q.actRight) : P ≅ Q where
hom :=
{ hom := f.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := f.inv
left_act_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id,
f_left_act_hom, ← Category.assoc, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id,
MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id, Category.id_comp]
right_act_hom := by
rw [← cancel_mono f.hom, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id,
f_right_act_hom, ← Category.assoc, ← comp_whiskerRight, Iso.inv_hom_id,
MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight, Category.id_comp] }
hom_inv_id := by ext; dsimp; rw [Iso.hom_inv_id]
inv_hom_id := by ext; dsimp; rw [Iso.inv_hom_id]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.iso_of_iso Bimod.isoOfIso
variable (A)
/-- A monoid object as a bimodule over itself. -/
@[simps]
def regular : Bimod A A where
X := A.X
actLeft := A.mul
actRight := A.mul
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.regular Bimod.regular
instance : Inhabited (Bimod A A) :=
⟨regular A⟩
/-- The forgetful functor from bimodule objects to the ambient category. -/
def forget : Bimod A B ⥤ C where
obj A := A.X
map f := f.hom
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.forget Bimod.forget
open CategoryTheory.Limits
variable [HasCoequalizers C]
namespace TensorBimod
variable {R S T : Mon_ C} (P : Bimod R S) (Q : Bimod S T)
/-- The underlying object of the tensor product of two bimodules. -/
noncomputable def X : C :=
coequalizer (P.actRight ▷ Q.X) ((α_ _ _ _).hom ≫ (P.X ◁ Q.actLeft))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.tensor_Bimod.X Bimod.TensorBimod.X
section
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfSize.{0, 0} (tensorLeft X)]
/-- Left action for the tensor product of two bimodules. -/
noncomputable def actLeft : R.X ⊗ X P Q ⟶ X P Q :=
(PreservesCoequalizer.iso (tensorLeft R.X) _ _).inv ≫
colimMap
(parallelPairHom _ _ _ _
((α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ ((α_ _ _ _).inv ▷ _) ≫ (P.actLeft ▷ S.X ▷ Q.X))
((α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (P.actLeft ▷ Q.X))
(by
dsimp
simp only [Category.assoc]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_middle]
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, middle_assoc, comp_whiskerRight]
coherence)
(by
dsimp
slice_lhs 1 1 => rw [MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_right]
slice_lhs 3 4 => rw [whisker_exchange]
coherence))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.tensor_Bimod.act_left Bimod.TensorBimod.actLeft
theorem whiskerLeft_π_actLeft :
(R.X ◁ coequalizer.π _ _) ≫ actLeft P Q =
(α_ _ _ _).inv ≫ (P.actLeft ▷ Q.X) ≫ coequalizer.π _ _ := by
erw [map_π_preserves_coequalizer_inv_colimMap (tensorLeft _)]
simp only [Category.assoc]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Bimod.tensor_Bimod.id_tensor_π_act_left Bimod.TensorBimod.whiskerLeft_π_actLeft
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Bimod.lean | 250 | 259 | theorem one_act_left' : (R.one ▷ _) ≫ actLeft P Q = (λ_ _).hom := by |
refine (cancel_epi ((tensorLeft _).map (coequalizer.π _ _))).1 ?_
dsimp [X]
-- Porting note: had to replace `rw` by `erw`
slice_lhs 1 2 => erw [whisker_exchange]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [whiskerLeft_π_actLeft]
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [associator_inv_naturality_left]
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [← comp_whiskerRight, one_actLeft]
slice_rhs 1 2 => rw [leftUnitor_naturality]
coherence
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Caratheodory
/-!
# Induced Outer Measure
We can extend a function defined on a subset of `Set α` to an outer measure.
The underlying function is called `extend`, and the measure it induces is called
`inducedOuterMeasure`.
Some lemmas below are proven twice, once in the general case, and one where the function `m`
is only defined on measurable sets (i.e. when `P = MeasurableSet`). In the latter cases, we can
remove some hypotheses in the statement. The general version has the same name, but with a prime
at the end.
## Tags
outer measure
-/
#align_import measure_theory.measure.outer_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped Classical NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
open OuterMeasure
section Extend
variable {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop}
variable (m : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- We can trivially extend a function defined on a subclass of objects (with codomain `ℝ≥0∞`)
to all objects by defining it to be `∞` on the objects not in the class. -/
def extend (s : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ h : P s, m s h
#align measure_theory.extend MeasureTheory.extend
theorem extend_eq {s : α} (h : P s) : extend m s = m s h := by simp [extend, h]
#align measure_theory.extend_eq MeasureTheory.extend_eq
theorem extend_eq_top {s : α} (h : ¬P s) : extend m s = ∞ := by simp [extend, h]
#align measure_theory.extend_eq_top MeasureTheory.extend_eq_top
theorem smul_extend {R} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
c • extend m = extend fun s h => c • m s h := by
ext1 s
dsimp [extend]
by_cases h : P s
· simp [h]
· simp [h, ENNReal.smul_top, hc]
#align measure_theory.smul_extend MeasureTheory.smul_extend
theorem le_extend {s : α} (h : P s) : m s h ≤ extend m s := by
simp only [extend, le_iInf_iff]
intro
rfl
#align measure_theory.le_extend MeasureTheory.le_extend
-- TODO: why this is a bad `congr` lemma?
theorem extend_congr {β : Type*} {Pb : β → Prop} {mb : ∀ s : β, Pb s → ℝ≥0∞} {sa : α} {sb : β}
(hP : P sa ↔ Pb sb) (hm : ∀ (ha : P sa) (hb : Pb sb), m sa ha = mb sb hb) :
extend m sa = extend mb sb :=
iInf_congr_Prop hP fun _h => hm _ _
#align measure_theory.extend_congr MeasureTheory.extend_congr
@[simp]
theorem extend_top {α : Type*} {P : α → Prop} : extend (fun _ _ => ∞ : ∀ s : α, P s → ℝ≥0∞) = ⊤ :=
funext fun _ => iInf_eq_top.mpr fun _ => rfl
#align measure_theory.extend_top MeasureTheory.extend_top
end Extend
section ExtendSet
variable {α : Type*} {P : Set α → Prop}
variable {m : ∀ s : Set α, P s → ℝ≥0∞}
variable (P0 : P ∅) (m0 : m ∅ P0 = 0)
variable (PU : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (_hm : ∀ i, P (f i)), P (⋃ i, f i))
variable
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, P (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
variable (msU : ∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, P (f i)), m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
variable (m_mono : ∀ ⦃s₁ s₂ : Set α⦄ (hs₁ : P s₁) (hs₂ : P s₂), s₁ ⊆ s₂ → m s₁ hs₁ ≤ m s₂ hs₂)
theorem extend_empty : extend m ∅ = 0 :=
(extend_eq _ P0).trans m0
#align measure_theory.extend_empty MeasureTheory.extend_empty
theorem extend_iUnion_nat {f : ℕ → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, P (f i))
(mU : m (⋃ i, f i) (PU hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i)) :
extend m (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, extend m (f i) :=
(extend_eq _ _).trans <|
mU.trans <| by
congr with i
rw [extend_eq]
#align measure_theory.extend_Union_nat MeasureTheory.extend_iUnion_nat
section Subadditive
theorem extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' (s : ℕ → Set α) :
extend m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, extend m (s i) := by
by_cases h : ∀ i, P (s i)
· rw [extend_eq _ (PU h), congr_arg tsum _]
· apply msU h
funext i
apply extend_eq _ (h i)
· cases' not_forall.1 h with i hi
exact le_trans (le_iInf fun h => hi.elim h) (ENNReal.le_tsum i)
#align measure_theory.extend_Union_le_tsum_nat' MeasureTheory.extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat'
end Subadditive
section Mono
theorem extend_mono' ⦃s₁ s₂ : Set α⦄ (h₁ : P s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ := by
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h₂
rw [extend_eq m h₁]
exact m_mono h₁ h₂ hs
#align measure_theory.extend_mono' MeasureTheory.extend_mono'
end Mono
section Unions
theorem extend_iUnion {β} [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on f))
(hm : ∀ i, P (f i)) : extend m (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, extend m (f i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
rw [← Encodable.iUnion_decode₂, ← tsum_iUnion_decode₂]
· exact
extend_iUnion_nat PU (fun n => Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_cases P0 hm)
(mU _ (Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_disjoint_on hd))
· exact extend_empty P0 m0
#align measure_theory.extend_Union MeasureTheory.extend_iUnion
theorem extend_union {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h₁ : P s₁) (h₂ : P s₂) :
extend m (s₁ ∪ s₂) = extend m s₁ + extend m s₂ := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion,
extend_iUnion P0 m0 PU mU (pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 hd) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩),
tsum_fintype]
simp
#align measure_theory.extend_union MeasureTheory.extend_union
end Unions
variable (m)
/-- Given an arbitrary function on a subset of sets, we can define the outer measure corresponding
to it (this is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most `m` on the domain of `m`). -/
def inducedOuterMeasure : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (extend m) (extend_empty P0 m0)
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure
variable {m P0 m0}
theorem le_inducedOuterMeasure {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 ↔ ∀ (s) (hs : P s), μ s ≤ m s hs :=
le_ofFunction.trans <| forall_congr' fun _s => le_iInf_iff
#align measure_theory.le_induced_outer_measure MeasureTheory.le_inducedOuterMeasure
/-- If `P u` is `False` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `P u = diam u < r`, then this lemma implies that
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`. -/
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_union_of_false_of_nonempty_inter {s t : Set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (t ∩ u).Nonempty → ¬P u) :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (s ∪ t) =
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s + inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 t :=
ofFunction_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter fun u hsu htu => @iInf_of_empty _ _ _ ⟨h u hsu htu⟩ _
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_union_of_false_of_nonempty_inter MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_union_of_false_of_nonempty_inter
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend' {s : Set α} (hs : P s) :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s = extend m s :=
ofFunction_eq s (fun _t => extend_mono' m_mono hs) (extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' PU msU)
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_eq_extend' MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend'
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq' {s : Set α} (hs : P s) : inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s = m s hs :=
(inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend' PU msU m_mono hs).trans <| extend_eq _ _
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_eq' MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_eq'
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s = ⨅ (t : Set α) (ht : P t) (_ : s ⊆ t), m t ht := by
apply le_antisymm
· simp only [le_iInf_iff]
intro t ht hs
refine le_trans (measure_mono hs) ?_
exact le_of_eq (inducedOuterMeasure_eq' _ msU m_mono _)
· refine le_iInf ?_
intro f
refine le_iInf ?_
intro hf
refine le_trans ?_ (extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' _ msU _)
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h2f
exact iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf_le_of_le h2f <| iInf_le _ hf)
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_eq_infi MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_preimage (f : α ≃ α) (Pm : ∀ s : Set α, P (f ⁻¹' s) ↔ P s)
(mm : ∀ (s : Set α) (hs : P s), m (f ⁻¹' s) ((Pm _).mpr hs) = m s hs) {A : Set α} :
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (f ⁻¹' A) = inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 A := by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono, inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono]; symm
refine f.injective.preimage_surjective.iInf_congr (preimage f) fun s => ?_
refine iInf_congr_Prop (Pm s) ?_; intro hs
refine iInf_congr_Prop f.surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff ?_
intro _; exact mm s hs
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_preimage MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_preimage
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set {s : Set α} (hs : inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ t : Set α,
P t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 t ≤ inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 s + ε := by
have h := ENNReal.lt_add_right hs hε
conv at h =>
lhs
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono]
simp only [iInf_lt_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨t, h1t, h2t, h3t⟩
exact
⟨t, h1t, h2t, le_trans (le_of_eq <| inducedOuterMeasure_eq' _ msU m_mono h1t) (le_of_lt h3t)⟩
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_exists_set MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_exists_set
/-- To test whether `s` is Carathéodory-measurable we only need to check the sets `t` for which
`P t` holds. See `ofFunction_caratheodory` for another way to show the Carathéodory-measurability
of `s`.
-/
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_caratheodory (s : Set α) :
MeasurableSet[(inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0).caratheodory] s ↔
∀ t : Set α,
P t →
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (t ∩ s) + inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 (t \ s) ≤
inducedOuterMeasure m P0 m0 t := by
rw [isCaratheodory_iff_le]
constructor
· intro h t _ht
exact h t
· intro h u
conv_rhs => rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq_iInf _ msU m_mono]
refine le_iInf ?_
intro t
refine le_iInf ?_
intro ht
refine le_iInf ?_
intro h2t
refine le_trans ?_ ((h t ht).trans_eq <| inducedOuterMeasure_eq' _ msU m_mono ht)
gcongr
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_caratheodory MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_caratheodory
end ExtendSet
/-! If `P` is `MeasurableSet` for some measurable space, then we can remove some hypotheses of the
above lemmas. -/
section MeasurableSpace
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
variable {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
variable (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
variable
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion hm) = ∑' i, m (f i) (hm i))
theorem extend_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h₁ : MeasurableSet s₁) (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
extend m s₁ ≤ extend m s₂ := by
refine le_iInf ?_; intro h₂
have :=
extend_union MeasurableSet.empty m0 MeasurableSet.iUnion mU disjoint_sdiff_self_right h₁
(h₂.diff h₁)
rw [union_diff_cancel hs] at this
rw [← extend_eq m]
exact le_iff_exists_add.2 ⟨_, this⟩
#align measure_theory.extend_mono MeasureTheory.extend_mono
theorem extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α,
extend m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, extend m (s i) := by
refine extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat' MeasurableSet.iUnion ?_; intro f h
simp (config := { singlePass := true }) only [iUnion_disjointed.symm]
rw [mU (MeasurableSet.disjointed h) (disjoint_disjointed _)]
refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => ?_
rw [← extend_eq m, ← extend_eq m]
exact extend_mono m0 mU (MeasurableSet.disjointed h _) (disjointed_le f _)
#align measure_theory.extend_Union_le_tsum_nat MeasureTheory.extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
inducedOuterMeasure m MeasurableSet.empty m0 s = extend m s :=
ofFunction_eq s (fun _t => extend_mono m0 mU hs) (extend_iUnion_le_tsum_nat m0 mU)
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_eq_extend MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend
theorem inducedOuterMeasure_eq {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
inducedOuterMeasure m MeasurableSet.empty m0 s = m s hs :=
(inducedOuterMeasure_eq_extend m0 mU hs).trans <| extend_eq _ _
#align measure_theory.induced_outer_measure_eq MeasureTheory.inducedOuterMeasure_eq
end MeasurableSpace
namespace OuterMeasure
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (m : OuterMeasure α)
/-- Given an outer measure `m` we can forget its value on non-measurable sets, and then consider
`m.trim`, the unique maximal outer measure less than that function. -/
def trim : OuterMeasure α :=
inducedOuterMeasure (fun s _ => m s) MeasurableSet.empty m.empty
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.trim MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.trim
theorem le_trim_iff {m₁ m₂ : OuterMeasure α} :
m₁ ≤ m₂.trim ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m₁ s ≤ m₂ s :=
le_inducedOuterMeasure
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.le_trim_iff MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff
theorem le_trim : m ≤ m.trim := le_trim_iff.2 fun _ _ ↦ le_rfl
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.le_trim MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.le_trim
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem trim_eq {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.trim s = m s :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq' MeasurableSet.iUnion (fun f _hf => measure_iUnion_le f)
(fun _ _ _ _ h => measure_mono h) hs
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.trim_eq MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.trim_eq
theorem trim_congr {m₁ m₂ : OuterMeasure α} (H : ∀ {s : Set α}, MeasurableSet s → m₁ s = m₂ s) :
m₁.trim = m₂.trim := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [trim, H]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.trim_congr MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.trim_congr
@[mono]
theorem trim_mono : Monotone (trim : OuterMeasure α → OuterMeasure α) := fun _m₁ _m₂ H _s =>
iInf₂_mono fun _f _hs => ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _b => iInf_mono fun _hf => H _
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.trim_mono MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.trim_mono
/-- `OuterMeasure.trim` is antitone in the σ-algebra. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Induced.lean | 347 | 351 | theorem trim_anti_measurableSpace (m : OuterMeasure α) {m0 m1 : MeasurableSpace α}
(h : m0 ≤ m1) : @trim _ m1 m ≤ @trim _ m0 m := by |
simp only [le_trim_iff]
intro s hs
rw [trim_eq _ (h s hs)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Alexander Bentkamp, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Lean.Expr.ExtraRecognizers
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import linear_algebra.linear_independent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
/-!
# Linear independence
This file defines linear independence in a module or vector space.
It is inspired by Isabelle/HOL's linear algebra, and hence indirectly by HOL Light.
We define `LinearIndependent R v` as `ker (Finsupp.total ι M R v) = ⊥`. Here `Finsupp.total` is the
linear map sending a function `f : ι →₀ R` with finite support to the linear combination of vectors
from `v` with these coefficients. Then we prove that several other statements are equivalent to this
one, including injectivity of `Finsupp.total ι M R v` and some versions with explicitly written
linear combinations.
## Main definitions
All definitions are given for families of vectors, i.e. `v : ι → M` where `M` is the module or
vector space and `ι : Type*` is an arbitrary indexing type.
* `LinearIndependent R v` states that the elements of the family `v` are linearly independent.
* `LinearIndependent.repr hv x` returns the linear combination representing `x : span R (range v)`
on the linearly independent vectors `v`, given `hv : LinearIndependent R v`
(using classical choice). `LinearIndependent.repr hv` is provided as a linear map.
## Main statements
We prove several specialized tests for linear independence of families of vectors and of sets of
vectors.
* `Fintype.linearIndependent_iff`: if `ι` is a finite type, then any function `f : ι → R` has
finite support, so we can reformulate the statement using `∑ i : ι, f i • v i` instead of a sum
over an auxiliary `s : Finset ι`;
* `linearIndependent_empty_type`: a family indexed by an empty type is linearly independent;
* `linearIndependent_unique_iff`: if `ι` is a singleton, then `LinearIndependent K v` is
equivalent to `v default ≠ 0`;
* `linearIndependent_option`, `linearIndependent_sum`, `linearIndependent_fin_cons`,
`linearIndependent_fin_succ`: type-specific tests for linear independence of families of vector
fields;
* `linearIndependent_insert`, `linearIndependent_union`, `linearIndependent_pair`,
`linearIndependent_singleton`: linear independence tests for set operations.
In many cases we additionally provide dot-style operations (e.g., `LinearIndependent.union`) to
make the linear independence tests usable as `hv.insert ha` etc.
We also prove that, when working over a division ring,
any family of vectors includes a linear independent subfamily spanning the same subspace.
## Implementation notes
We use families instead of sets because it allows us to say that two identical vectors are linearly
dependent.
If you want to use sets, use the family `(fun x ↦ x : s → M)` given a set `s : Set M`. The lemmas
`LinearIndependent.to_subtype_range` and `LinearIndependent.of_subtype_range` connect those two
worlds.
## Tags
linearly dependent, linear dependence, linearly independent, linear independence
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set Submodule
open Cardinal
universe u' u
variable {ι : Type u'} {ι' : Type*} {R : Type*} {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M' M'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
section Module
variable {v : ι → M}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [AddCommMonoid M'']
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M'']
variable {a b : R} {x y : M}
variable (R) (v)
/-- `LinearIndependent R v` states the family of vectors `v` is linearly independent over `R`. -/
def LinearIndependent : Prop :=
LinearMap.ker (Finsupp.total ι M R v) = ⊥
#align linear_independent LinearIndependent
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Delaborator for `LinearIndependent` that suggests pretty printing with type hints
in case the family of vectors is over a `Set`.
Type hints look like `LinearIndependent fun (v : ↑s) => ↑v` or `LinearIndependent (ι := ↑s) f`,
depending on whether the family is a lambda expression or not. -/
@[delab app.LinearIndependent]
def delabLinearIndependent : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
whenNotPPOption getPPAnalysisSkip <|
withOptionAtCurrPos `pp.analysis.skip true do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``LinearIndependent 7
let some _ := (e.getArg! 0).coeTypeSet? | failure
let optionsPerPos ← if (e.getArg! 3).isLambda then
withNaryArg 3 do return (← read).optionsPerPos.setBool (← getPos) pp.funBinderTypes.name true
else
withNaryArg 0 do return (← read).optionsPerPos.setBool (← getPos) `pp.analysis.namedArg true
withTheReader Context ({· with optionsPerPos}) delab
variable {R} {v}
theorem linearIndependent_iff :
LinearIndependent R v ↔ ∀ l, Finsupp.total ι M R v l = 0 → l = 0 := by
simp [LinearIndependent, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot']
#align linear_independent_iff linearIndependent_iff
theorem linearIndependent_iff' :
LinearIndependent R v ↔
∀ s : Finset ι, ∀ g : ι → R, ∑ i ∈ s, g i • v i = 0 → ∀ i ∈ s, g i = 0 :=
linearIndependent_iff.trans
⟨fun hf s g hg i his =>
have h :=
hf (∑ i ∈ s, Finsupp.single i (g i)) <| by
simpa only [map_sum, Finsupp.total_single] using hg
calc
g i = (Finsupp.lapply i : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] R) (Finsupp.single i (g i)) := by
{ rw [Finsupp.lapply_apply, Finsupp.single_eq_same] }
_ = ∑ j ∈ s, (Finsupp.lapply i : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] R) (Finsupp.single j (g j)) :=
Eq.symm <|
Finset.sum_eq_single i
(fun j _hjs hji => by rw [Finsupp.lapply_apply, Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne hji])
fun hnis => hnis.elim his
_ = (∑ j ∈ s, Finsupp.single j (g j)) i := (map_sum ..).symm
_ = 0 := DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h i,
fun hf l hl =>
Finsupp.ext fun i =>
_root_.by_contradiction fun hni => hni <| hf _ _ hl _ <| Finsupp.mem_support_iff.2 hni⟩
#align linear_independent_iff' linearIndependent_iff'
theorem linearIndependent_iff'' :
LinearIndependent R v ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → R), (∀ i ∉ s, g i = 0) →
∑ i ∈ s, g i • v i = 0 → ∀ i, g i = 0 := by
classical
exact linearIndependent_iff'.trans
⟨fun H s g hg hv i => if his : i ∈ s then H s g hv i his else hg i his, fun H s g hg i hi => by
convert
H s (fun j => if j ∈ s then g j else 0) (fun j hj => if_neg hj)
(by simp_rw [ite_smul, zero_smul, Finset.sum_extend_by_zero, hg]) i
exact (if_pos hi).symm⟩
#align linear_independent_iff'' linearIndependent_iff''
theorem not_linearIndependent_iff :
¬LinearIndependent R v ↔
∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ g : ι → R, ∑ i ∈ s, g i • v i = 0 ∧ ∃ i ∈ s, g i ≠ 0 := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
simp only [exists_prop, not_forall]
#align not_linear_independent_iff not_linearIndependent_iff
theorem Fintype.linearIndependent_iff [Fintype ι] :
LinearIndependent R v ↔ ∀ g : ι → R, ∑ i, g i • v i = 0 → ∀ i, g i = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun H g => by simpa using linearIndependent_iff'.1 H Finset.univ g, fun H =>
linearIndependent_iff''.2 fun s g hg hs i => H _ ?_ _⟩
rw [← hs]
refine (Finset.sum_subset (Finset.subset_univ _) fun i _ hi => ?_).symm
rw [hg i hi, zero_smul]
#align fintype.linear_independent_iff Fintype.linearIndependent_iff
/-- A finite family of vectors `v i` is linear independent iff the linear map that sends
`c : ι → R` to `∑ i, c i • v i` has the trivial kernel. -/
theorem Fintype.linearIndependent_iff' [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] :
LinearIndependent R v ↔
LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.lsum R (fun _ ↦ R) ℕ fun i ↦ LinearMap.id.smulRight (v i)) = ⊥ := by
simp [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff, LinearMap.ker_eq_bot', funext_iff]
#align fintype.linear_independent_iff' Fintype.linearIndependent_iff'
theorem Fintype.not_linearIndependent_iff [Fintype ι] :
¬LinearIndependent R v ↔ ∃ g : ι → R, ∑ i, g i • v i = 0 ∧ ∃ i, g i ≠ 0 := by
simpa using not_iff_not.2 Fintype.linearIndependent_iff
#align fintype.not_linear_independent_iff Fintype.not_linearIndependent_iff
theorem linearIndependent_empty_type [IsEmpty ι] : LinearIndependent R v :=
linearIndependent_iff.mpr fun v _hv => Subsingleton.elim v 0
#align linear_independent_empty_type linearIndependent_empty_type
theorem LinearIndependent.ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (i : ι) (hv : LinearIndependent R v) : v i ≠ 0 :=
fun h =>
zero_ne_one' R <|
Eq.symm
(by
suffices (Finsupp.single i 1 : ι →₀ R) i = 0 by simpa
rw [linearIndependent_iff.1 hv (Finsupp.single i 1)]
· simp
· simp [h])
#align linear_independent.ne_zero LinearIndependent.ne_zero
lemma LinearIndependent.eq_zero_of_pair {x y : M} (h : LinearIndependent R ![x, y])
{s t : R} (h' : s • x + t • y = 0) : s = 0 ∧ t = 0 := by
have := linearIndependent_iff'.1 h Finset.univ ![s, t]
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_two, Matrix.cons_val_zero, Matrix.cons_val_one, Matrix.head_cons, h',
Finset.mem_univ, forall_true_left] at this
exact ⟨this 0, this 1⟩
/-- Also see `LinearIndependent.pair_iff'` for a simpler version over fields. -/
lemma LinearIndependent.pair_iff {x y : M} :
LinearIndependent R ![x, y] ↔ ∀ (s t : R), s • x + t • y = 0 → s = 0 ∧ t = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h s t hst ↦ h.eq_zero_of_pair hst, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
apply Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.2
intro g hg
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_two, Matrix.cons_val_zero, Matrix.cons_val_one, Matrix.head_cons] at hg
intro i
fin_cases i
exacts [(h _ _ hg).1, (h _ _ hg).2]
/-- A subfamily of a linearly independent family (i.e., a composition with an injective map) is a
linearly independent family. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.comp (h : LinearIndependent R v) (f : ι' → ι) (hf : Injective f) :
LinearIndependent R (v ∘ f) := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff, Finsupp.total_comp]
intro l hl
have h_map_domain : ∀ x, (Finsupp.mapDomain f l) (f x) = 0 := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff.1 h (Finsupp.mapDomain f l) hl]; simp
ext x
convert h_map_domain x
rw [Finsupp.mapDomain_apply hf]
#align linear_independent.comp LinearIndependent.comp
/-- A family is linearly independent if and only if all of its finite subfamily is
linearly independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_iff_finset_linearIndependent :
LinearIndependent R v ↔ ∀ (s : Finset ι), LinearIndependent R (v ∘ (Subtype.val : s → ι)) :=
⟨fun H _ ↦ H.comp _ Subtype.val_injective, fun H ↦ linearIndependent_iff'.2 fun s g hg i hi ↦
Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.1 (H s) (g ∘ Subtype.val)
(hg ▸ Finset.sum_attach s fun j ↦ g j • v j) ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
theorem LinearIndependent.coe_range (i : LinearIndependent R v) :
LinearIndependent R ((↑) : range v → M) := by simpa using i.comp _ (rangeSplitting_injective v)
#align linear_independent.coe_range LinearIndependent.coe_range
/-- If `v` is a linearly independent family of vectors and the kernel of a linear map `f` is
disjoint with the submodule spanned by the vectors of `v`, then `f ∘ v` is a linearly independent
family of vectors. See also `LinearIndependent.map'` for a special case assuming `ker f = ⊥`. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.map (hv : LinearIndependent R v) {f : M →ₗ[R] M'}
(hf_inj : Disjoint (span R (range v)) (LinearMap.ker f)) : LinearIndependent R (f ∘ v) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← Set.image_univ, Finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total,
map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap, map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_bot, Finsupp.supported_univ, top_inf_eq]
at hf_inj
unfold LinearIndependent at hv ⊢
rw [hv, le_bot_iff] at hf_inj
haveI : Inhabited M := ⟨0⟩
rw [Finsupp.total_comp, Finsupp.lmapDomain_total _ _ f, LinearMap.ker_comp,
hf_inj]
exact fun _ => rfl
#align linear_independent.map LinearIndependent.map
/-- If `v` is an injective family of vectors such that `f ∘ v` is linearly independent, then `v`
spans a submodule disjoint from the kernel of `f` -/
theorem Submodule.range_ker_disjoint {f : M →ₗ[R] M'}
(hv : LinearIndependent R (f ∘ v)) :
Disjoint (span R (range v)) (LinearMap.ker f) := by
rw [LinearIndependent, Finsupp.total_comp, Finsupp.lmapDomain_total R _ f (fun _ ↦ rfl),
LinearMap.ker_comp] at hv
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← Set.image_univ, Finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total,
map_inf_eq_map_inf_comap, hv, inf_bot_eq, map_bot]
/-- An injective linear map sends linearly independent families of vectors to linearly independent
families of vectors. See also `LinearIndependent.map` for a more general statement. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.map' (hv : LinearIndependent R v) (f : M →ₗ[R] M')
(hf_inj : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) : LinearIndependent R (f ∘ v) :=
hv.map <| by simp [hf_inj]
#align linear_independent.map' LinearIndependent.map'
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R' → R` is a map, `j : M →+ M'` is a monoid map,
such that they send non-zero elements to non-zero elements, and compatible with the scalar
multiplications on `M` and `M'`, then `j` sends linearly independent families of vectors to
linearly independent families of vectors. As a special case, taking `R = R'`
it is `LinearIndependent.map'`. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.map_of_injective_injective {R' : Type*} {M' : Type*}
[Semiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M'] (hv : LinearIndependent R v)
(i : R' → R) (j : M →+ M') (hi : ∀ r, i r = 0 → r = 0) (hj : ∀ m, j m = 0 → m = 0)
(hc : ∀ (r : R') (m : M), j (i r • m) = r • j m) : LinearIndependent R' (j ∘ v) := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at hv ⊢
intro S r' H s hs
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← hc, ← map_sum] at H
exact hi _ <| hv _ _ (hj _ H) s hs
/-- If `M / R` and `M' / R'` are modules, `i : R → R'` is a surjective map which maps zero to zero,
`j : M →+ M'` is a monoid map which sends non-zero elements to non-zero elements, such that the
scalar multiplications on `M` and `M'` are compatible, then `j` sends linearly independent families
of vectors to linearly independent families of vectors. As a special case, taking `R = R'`
it is `LinearIndependent.map'`. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.map_of_surjective_injective {R' : Type*} {M' : Type*}
[Semiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M'] (hv : LinearIndependent R v)
(i : ZeroHom R R') (j : M →+ M') (hi : Surjective i) (hj : ∀ m, j m = 0 → m = 0)
(hc : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), j (r • m) = i r • j m) : LinearIndependent R' (j ∘ v) := by
obtain ⟨i', hi'⟩ := hi.hasRightInverse
refine hv.map_of_injective_injective i' j (fun _ h ↦ ?_) hj fun r m ↦ ?_
· apply_fun i at h
rwa [hi', i.map_zero] at h
rw [hc (i' r) m, hi']
/-- If the image of a family of vectors under a linear map is linearly independent, then so is
the original family. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.of_comp (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hfv : LinearIndependent R (f ∘ v)) :
LinearIndependent R v :=
linearIndependent_iff'.2 fun s g hg i his =>
have : (∑ i ∈ s, g i • f (v i)) = 0 := by
simp_rw [← map_smul, ← map_sum, hg, f.map_zero]
linearIndependent_iff'.1 hfv s g this i his
#align linear_independent.of_comp LinearIndependent.of_comp
/-- If `f` is an injective linear map, then the family `f ∘ v` is linearly independent
if and only if the family `v` is linearly independent. -/
protected theorem LinearMap.linearIndependent_iff (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (hf_inj : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) :
LinearIndependent R (f ∘ v) ↔ LinearIndependent R v :=
⟨fun h => h.of_comp f, fun h => h.map <| by simp only [hf_inj, disjoint_bot_right]⟩
#align linear_map.linear_independent_iff LinearMap.linearIndependent_iff
@[nontriviality]
theorem linearIndependent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : LinearIndependent R v :=
linearIndependent_iff.2 fun _l _hl => Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align linear_independent_of_subsingleton linearIndependent_of_subsingleton
theorem linearIndependent_equiv (e : ι ≃ ι') {f : ι' → M} :
LinearIndependent R (f ∘ e) ↔ LinearIndependent R f :=
⟨fun h => Function.comp_id f ▸ e.self_comp_symm ▸ h.comp _ e.symm.injective, fun h =>
h.comp _ e.injective⟩
#align linear_independent_equiv linearIndependent_equiv
theorem linearIndependent_equiv' (e : ι ≃ ι') {f : ι' → M} {g : ι → M} (h : f ∘ e = g) :
LinearIndependent R g ↔ LinearIndependent R f :=
h ▸ linearIndependent_equiv e
#align linear_independent_equiv' linearIndependent_equiv'
theorem linearIndependent_subtype_range {ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : Injective f) :
LinearIndependent R ((↑) : range f → M) ↔ LinearIndependent R f :=
Iff.symm <| linearIndependent_equiv' (Equiv.ofInjective f hf) rfl
#align linear_independent_subtype_range linearIndependent_subtype_range
alias ⟨LinearIndependent.of_subtype_range, _⟩ := linearIndependent_subtype_range
#align linear_independent.of_subtype_range LinearIndependent.of_subtype_range
theorem linearIndependent_image {ι} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : Set.InjOn f s) :
(LinearIndependent R fun x : s => f x) ↔ LinearIndependent R fun x : f '' s => (x : M) :=
linearIndependent_equiv' (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn _ _ hf) rfl
#align linear_independent_image linearIndependent_image
theorem linearIndependent_span (hs : LinearIndependent R v) :
LinearIndependent R (M := span R (range v))
(fun i : ι => ⟨v i, subset_span (mem_range_self i)⟩) :=
LinearIndependent.of_comp (span R (range v)).subtype hs
#align linear_independent_span linearIndependent_span
/-- See `LinearIndependent.fin_cons` for a family of elements in a vector space. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.fin_cons' {m : ℕ} (x : M) (v : Fin m → M) (hli : LinearIndependent R v)
(x_ortho : ∀ (c : R) (y : Submodule.span R (Set.range v)), c • x + y = (0 : M) → c = 0) :
LinearIndependent R (Fin.cons x v : Fin m.succ → M) := by
rw [Fintype.linearIndependent_iff] at hli ⊢
rintro g total_eq j
simp_rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ] at total_eq
have : g 0 = 0 := by
refine x_ortho (g 0) ⟨∑ i : Fin m, g i.succ • v i, ?_⟩ total_eq
exact sum_mem fun i _ => smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨i, rfl⟩)
rw [this, zero_smul, zero_add] at total_eq
exact Fin.cases this (hli _ total_eq) j
#align linear_independent.fin_cons' LinearIndependent.fin_cons'
/-- A set of linearly independent vectors in a module `M` over a semiring `K` is also linearly
independent over a subring `R` of `K`.
The implementation uses minimal assumptions about the relationship between `R`, `K` and `M`.
The version where `K` is an `R`-algebra is `LinearIndependent.restrict_scalars_algebras`.
-/
theorem LinearIndependent.restrict_scalars [Semiring K] [SMulWithZero R K] [Module K M]
[IsScalarTower R K M] (hinj : Function.Injective fun r : R => r • (1 : K))
(li : LinearIndependent K v) : LinearIndependent R v := by
refine linearIndependent_iff'.mpr fun s g hg i hi => hinj ?_
dsimp only; rw [zero_smul]
refine (linearIndependent_iff'.mp li : _) _ (g · • (1:K)) ?_ i hi
simp_rw [smul_assoc, one_smul]
exact hg
#align linear_independent.restrict_scalars LinearIndependent.restrict_scalars
/-- Every finite subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent. -/
theorem linearIndependent_finset_map_embedding_subtype (s : Set M)
(li : LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M)) (t : Finset s) :
LinearIndependent R ((↑) : Finset.map (Embedding.subtype s) t → M) := by
let f : t.map (Embedding.subtype s) → s := fun x =>
⟨x.1, by
obtain ⟨x, h⟩ := x
rw [Finset.mem_map] at h
obtain ⟨a, _ha, rfl⟩ := h
simp only [Subtype.coe_prop, Embedding.coe_subtype]⟩
convert LinearIndependent.comp li f ?_
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [Finset.mem_map] at hx hy
obtain ⟨a, _ha, rfl⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨b, _hb, rfl⟩ := hy
simp only [f, imp_self, Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
#align linear_independent_finset_map_embedding_subtype linearIndependent_finset_map_embedding_subtype
/-- If every finite set of linearly independent vectors has cardinality at most `n`,
then the same is true for arbitrary sets of linearly independent vectors.
-/
theorem linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ s : Finset M, (LinearIndependent R fun i : s => (i : M)) → s.card ≤ n) :
∀ s : Set M, LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M) → #s ≤ n := by
intro s li
apply Cardinal.card_le_of
intro t
rw [← Finset.card_map (Embedding.subtype s)]
apply H
apply linearIndependent_finset_map_embedding_subtype _ li
#align linear_independent_bounded_of_finset_linear_independent_bounded linearIndependent_bounded_of_finset_linearIndependent_bounded
section Subtype
/-! The following lemmas use the subtype defined by a set in `M` as the index set `ι`. -/
theorem linearIndependent_comp_subtype {s : Set ι} :
LinearIndependent R (v ∘ (↑) : s → M) ↔
∀ l ∈ Finsupp.supported R R s, (Finsupp.total ι M R v) l = 0 → l = 0 := by
simp only [linearIndependent_iff, (· ∘ ·), Finsupp.mem_supported, Finsupp.total_apply,
Set.subset_def, Finset.mem_coe]
constructor
· intro h l hl₁ hl₂
have := h (l.subtypeDomain s) ((Finsupp.sum_subtypeDomain_index hl₁).trans hl₂)
exact (Finsupp.subtypeDomain_eq_zero_iff hl₁).1 this
· intro h l hl
refine Finsupp.embDomain_eq_zero.1 (h (l.embDomain <| Function.Embedding.subtype s) ?_ ?_)
· suffices ∀ i hi, ¬l ⟨i, hi⟩ = 0 → i ∈ s by simpa
intros
assumption
· rwa [Finsupp.embDomain_eq_mapDomain, Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
exacts [fun _ => zero_smul _ _, fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _]
#align linear_independent_comp_subtype linearIndependent_comp_subtype
theorem linearDependent_comp_subtype' {s : Set ι} :
¬LinearIndependent R (v ∘ (↑) : s → M) ↔
∃ f : ι →₀ R, f ∈ Finsupp.supported R R s ∧ Finsupp.total ι M R v f = 0 ∧ f ≠ 0 := by
simp [linearIndependent_comp_subtype, and_left_comm]
#align linear_dependent_comp_subtype' linearDependent_comp_subtype'
/-- A version of `linearDependent_comp_subtype'` with `Finsupp.total` unfolded. -/
theorem linearDependent_comp_subtype {s : Set ι} :
¬LinearIndependent R (v ∘ (↑) : s → M) ↔
∃ f : ι →₀ R, f ∈ Finsupp.supported R R s ∧ ∑ i ∈ f.support, f i • v i = 0 ∧ f ≠ 0 :=
linearDependent_comp_subtype'
#align linear_dependent_comp_subtype linearDependent_comp_subtype
theorem linearIndependent_subtype {s : Set M} :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M) ↔
∀ l ∈ Finsupp.supported R R s, (Finsupp.total M M R id) l = 0 → l = 0 := by
apply linearIndependent_comp_subtype (v := id)
#align linear_independent_subtype linearIndependent_subtype
theorem linearIndependent_comp_subtype_disjoint {s : Set ι} :
LinearIndependent R (v ∘ (↑) : s → M) ↔
Disjoint (Finsupp.supported R R s) (LinearMap.ker <| Finsupp.total ι M R v) := by
rw [linearIndependent_comp_subtype, LinearMap.disjoint_ker]
#align linear_independent_comp_subtype_disjoint linearIndependent_comp_subtype_disjoint
theorem linearIndependent_subtype_disjoint {s : Set M} :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M) ↔
Disjoint (Finsupp.supported R R s) (LinearMap.ker <| Finsupp.total M M R id) := by
apply linearIndependent_comp_subtype_disjoint (v := id)
#align linear_independent_subtype_disjoint linearIndependent_subtype_disjoint
theorem linearIndependent_iff_totalOn {s : Set M} :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M) ↔
(LinearMap.ker <| Finsupp.totalOn M M R id s) = ⊥ := by
rw [Finsupp.totalOn, LinearMap.ker, LinearMap.comap_codRestrict, Submodule.map_bot, comap_bot,
LinearMap.ker_comp, linearIndependent_subtype_disjoint, disjoint_iff_inf_le, ←
map_comap_subtype, map_le_iff_le_comap, comap_bot, ker_subtype, le_bot_iff]
#align linear_independent_iff_total_on linearIndependent_iff_totalOn
theorem LinearIndependent.restrict_of_comp_subtype {s : Set ι}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (v ∘ (↑) : s → M)) : LinearIndependent R (s.restrict v) :=
hs
#align linear_independent.restrict_of_comp_subtype LinearIndependent.restrict_of_comp_subtype
variable (R M)
theorem linearIndependent_empty : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : (∅ : Set M) → M) := by
simp [linearIndependent_subtype_disjoint]
#align linear_independent_empty linearIndependent_empty
variable {R M}
theorem LinearIndependent.mono {t s : Set M} (h : t ⊆ s) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M) → LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : t → M) := by
simp only [linearIndependent_subtype_disjoint]
exact Disjoint.mono_left (Finsupp.supported_mono h)
#align linear_independent.mono LinearIndependent.mono
theorem linearIndependent_of_finite (s : Set M)
(H : ∀ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t → LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : t → M)) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M) :=
linearIndependent_subtype.2 fun l hl =>
linearIndependent_subtype.1 (H _ hl (Finset.finite_toSet _)) l (Subset.refl _)
#align linear_independent_of_finite linearIndependent_of_finite
theorem linearIndependent_iUnion_of_directed {η : Type*} {s : η → Set M} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(h : ∀ i, LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s i → M)) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : (⋃ i, s i) → M) := by
by_cases hη : Nonempty η
· refine linearIndependent_of_finite (⋃ i, s i) fun t ht ft => ?_
rcases finite_subset_iUnion ft ht with ⟨I, fi, hI⟩
rcases hs.finset_le fi.toFinset with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact (h i).mono (Subset.trans hI <| iUnion₂_subset fun j hj => hi j (fi.mem_toFinset.2 hj))
· refine (linearIndependent_empty R M).mono (t := iUnion (s ·)) ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, ⟨i, _⟩, _⟩
exact hη ⟨i⟩
#align linear_independent_Union_of_directed linearIndependent_iUnion_of_directed
theorem linearIndependent_sUnion_of_directed {s : Set (Set M)} (hs : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) s)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, LinearIndependent R ((↑) : ((a : Set M) : Type _) → M)) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : ⋃₀ s → M) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion];
exact linearIndependent_iUnion_of_directed hs.directed_val (by simpa using h)
#align linear_independent_sUnion_of_directed linearIndependent_sUnion_of_directed
theorem linearIndependent_biUnion_of_directed {η} {s : Set η} {t : η → Set M}
(hs : DirectedOn (t ⁻¹'o (· ⊆ ·)) s) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : t a → M)) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : (⋃ a ∈ s, t a) → M) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact
linearIndependent_iUnion_of_directed (directed_comp.2 <| hs.directed_val) (by simpa using h)
#align linear_independent_bUnion_of_directed linearIndependent_biUnion_of_directed
end Subtype
end Module
/-! ### Properties which require `Ring R` -/
section Module
variable {v : ι → M}
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M'] [AddCommGroup M'']
variable [Module R M] [Module R M'] [Module R M'']
variable {a b : R} {x y : M}
theorem linearIndependent_iff_injective_total :
LinearIndependent R v ↔ Function.Injective (Finsupp.total ι M R v) :=
linearIndependent_iff.trans
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero (Finsupp.total ι M R v).toAddMonoidHom).symm
#align linear_independent_iff_injective_total linearIndependent_iff_injective_total
alias ⟨LinearIndependent.injective_total, _⟩ := linearIndependent_iff_injective_total
#align linear_independent.injective_total LinearIndependent.injective_total
theorem LinearIndependent.injective [Nontrivial R] (hv : LinearIndependent R v) : Injective v := by
intro i j hij
let l : ι →₀ R := Finsupp.single i (1 : R) - Finsupp.single j 1
have h_total : Finsupp.total ι M R v l = 0 := by
simp_rw [l, LinearMap.map_sub, Finsupp.total_apply]
simp [hij]
have h_single_eq : Finsupp.single i (1 : R) = Finsupp.single j 1 := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff] at hv
simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq' (hv l h_total)]
simpa [Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff] using h_single_eq
#align linear_independent.injective LinearIndependent.injective
theorem LinearIndependent.to_subtype_range {ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) :
LinearIndependent R ((↑) : range f → M) := by
nontriviality R
exact (linearIndependent_subtype_range hf.injective).2 hf
#align linear_independent.to_subtype_range LinearIndependent.to_subtype_range
theorem LinearIndependent.to_subtype_range' {ι} {f : ι → M} (hf : LinearIndependent R f) {t}
(ht : range f = t) : LinearIndependent R ((↑) : t → M) :=
ht ▸ hf.to_subtype_range
#align linear_independent.to_subtype_range' LinearIndependent.to_subtype_range'
theorem LinearIndependent.image_of_comp {ι ι'} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → ι') (g : ι' → M)
(hs : LinearIndependent R fun x : s => g (f x)) :
LinearIndependent R fun x : f '' s => g x := by
nontriviality R
have : InjOn f s := injOn_iff_injective.2 hs.injective.of_comp
exact (linearIndependent_equiv' (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s this) rfl).1 hs
#align linear_independent.image_of_comp LinearIndependent.image_of_comp
theorem LinearIndependent.image {ι} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → M}
(hs : LinearIndependent R fun x : s => f x) :
LinearIndependent R fun x : f '' s => (x : M) := by
convert LinearIndependent.image_of_comp s f id hs
#align linear_independent.image LinearIndependent.image
theorem LinearIndependent.group_smul {G : Type*} [hG : Group G] [DistribMulAction G R]
[DistribMulAction G M] [IsScalarTower G R M] [SMulCommClass G R M] {v : ι → M}
(hv : LinearIndependent R v) (w : ι → G) : LinearIndependent R (w • v) := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff''] at hv ⊢
intro s g hgs hsum i
refine (smul_eq_zero_iff_eq (w i)).1 ?_
refine hv s (fun i => w i • g i) (fun i hi => ?_) ?_ i
· dsimp only
exact (hgs i hi).symm ▸ smul_zero _
· rw [← hsum, Finset.sum_congr rfl _]
intros
dsimp
rw [smul_assoc, smul_comm]
#align linear_independent.group_smul LinearIndependent.group_smul
-- This lemma cannot be proved with `LinearIndependent.group_smul` since the action of
-- `Rˣ` on `R` is not commutative.
theorem LinearIndependent.units_smul {v : ι → M} (hv : LinearIndependent R v) (w : ι → Rˣ) :
LinearIndependent R (w • v) := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff''] at hv ⊢
intro s g hgs hsum i
rw [← (w i).mul_left_eq_zero]
refine hv s (fun i => g i • (w i : R)) (fun i hi => ?_) ?_ i
· dsimp only
exact (hgs i hi).symm ▸ zero_smul _ _
· rw [← hsum, Finset.sum_congr rfl _]
intros
erw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_assoc]
rfl
#align linear_independent.units_smul LinearIndependent.units_smul
lemma LinearIndependent.eq_of_pair {x y : M} (h : LinearIndependent R ![x, y])
{s t s' t' : R} (h' : s • x + t • y = s' • x + t' • y) : s = s' ∧ t = t' := by
have : (s - s') • x + (t - t') • y = 0 := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero_of_eq h', ← sub_eq_zero]
simp only [sub_smul]
abel
simpa [sub_eq_zero] using h.eq_zero_of_pair this
lemma LinearIndependent.eq_zero_of_pair' {x y : M} (h : LinearIndependent R ![x, y])
{s t : R} (h' : s • x = t • y) : s = 0 ∧ t = 0 := by
suffices H : s = 0 ∧ 0 = t from ⟨H.1, H.2.symm⟩
exact h.eq_of_pair (by simpa using h')
/-- If two vectors `x` and `y` are linearly independent, so are their linear combinations
`a x + b y` and `c x + d y` provided the determinant `a * d - b * c` is nonzero. -/
lemma LinearIndependent.linear_combination_pair_of_det_ne_zero {R M : Type*} [CommRing R]
[NoZeroDivisors R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
{x y : M} (h : LinearIndependent R ![x, y])
{a b c d : R} (h' : a * d - b * c ≠ 0) :
LinearIndependent R ![a • x + b • y, c • x + d • y] := by
apply LinearIndependent.pair_iff.2 (fun s t hst ↦ ?_)
have H : (s * a + t * c) • x + (s * b + t * d) • y = 0 := by
convert hst using 1
simp only [_root_.add_smul, smul_add, smul_smul]
abel
have I1 : s * a + t * c = 0 := (h.eq_zero_of_pair H).1
have I2 : s * b + t * d = 0 := (h.eq_zero_of_pair H).2
have J1 : (a * d - b * c) * s = 0 := by linear_combination d * I1 - c * I2
have J2 : (a * d - b * c) * t = 0 := by linear_combination -b * I1 + a * I2
exact ⟨by simpa [h'] using mul_eq_zero.1 J1, by simpa [h'] using mul_eq_zero.1 J2⟩
section Maximal
universe v w
/--
A linearly independent family is maximal if there is no strictly larger linearly independent family.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def LinearIndependent.Maximal {ι : Type w} {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {M : Type v} [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] {v : ι → M} (_i : LinearIndependent R v) : Prop :=
∀ (s : Set M) (_i' : LinearIndependent R ((↑) : s → M)) (_h : range v ≤ s), range v = s
#align linear_independent.maximal LinearIndependent.Maximal
/-- An alternative characterization of a maximal linearly independent family,
quantifying over types (in the same universe as `M`) into which the indexing family injects.
-/
theorem LinearIndependent.maximal_iff {ι : Type w} {R : Type u} [Ring R] [Nontrivial R] {M : Type v}
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {v : ι → M} (i : LinearIndependent R v) :
i.Maximal ↔
∀ (κ : Type v) (w : κ → M) (_i' : LinearIndependent R w) (j : ι → κ) (_h : w ∘ j = v),
Surjective j := by
constructor
· rintro p κ w i' j rfl
specialize p (range w) i'.coe_range (range_comp_subset_range _ _)
rw [range_comp, ← image_univ (f := w)] at p
exact range_iff_surjective.mp (image_injective.mpr i'.injective p)
· intro p w i' h
specialize
p w ((↑) : w → M) i' (fun i => ⟨v i, range_subset_iff.mp h i⟩)
(by
ext
simp)
have q := congr_arg (fun s => ((↑) : w → M) '' s) p.range_eq
dsimp at q
rw [← image_univ, image_image] at q
simpa using q
#align linear_independent.maximal_iff LinearIndependent.maximal_iff
end Maximal
/-- Linear independent families are injective, even if you multiply either side. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.eq_of_smul_apply_eq_smul_apply {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
{v : ι → M} (li : LinearIndependent R v) (c d : R) (i j : ι) (hc : c ≠ 0)
(h : c • v i = d • v j) : i = j := by
let l : ι →₀ R := Finsupp.single i c - Finsupp.single j d
have h_total : Finsupp.total ι M R v l = 0 := by
simp_rw [l, LinearMap.map_sub, Finsupp.total_apply]
simp [h]
have h_single_eq : Finsupp.single i c = Finsupp.single j d := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff] at li
simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq' (li l h_total)]
rcases (Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff ..).mp h_single_eq with (⟨H, _⟩ | ⟨hc, _⟩)
· exact H
· contradiction
#align linear_independent.eq_of_smul_apply_eq_smul_apply LinearIndependent.eq_of_smul_apply_eq_smul_apply
section Subtype
/-! The following lemmas use the subtype defined by a set in `M` as the index set `ι`. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.disjoint_span_image (hv : LinearIndependent R v) {s t : Set ι}
(hs : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (Submodule.span R <| v '' s) (Submodule.span R <| v '' t) := by
simp only [disjoint_def, Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total]
rintro _ ⟨l₁, hl₁, rfl⟩ ⟨l₂, hl₂, H⟩
rw [hv.injective_total.eq_iff] at H; subst l₂
have : l₁ = 0 := Submodule.disjoint_def.mp (Finsupp.disjoint_supported_supported hs) _ hl₁ hl₂
simp [this]
#align linear_independent.disjoint_span_image LinearIndependent.disjoint_span_image
theorem LinearIndependent.not_mem_span_image [Nontrivial R] (hv : LinearIndependent R v) {s : Set ι}
{x : ι} (h : x ∉ s) : v x ∉ Submodule.span R (v '' s) := by
have h' : v x ∈ Submodule.span R (v '' {x}) := by
rw [Set.image_singleton]
exact mem_span_singleton_self (v x)
intro w
apply LinearIndependent.ne_zero x hv
refine disjoint_def.1 (hv.disjoint_span_image ?_) (v x) h' w
simpa using h
#align linear_independent.not_mem_span_image LinearIndependent.not_mem_span_image
theorem LinearIndependent.total_ne_of_not_mem_support [Nontrivial R] (hv : LinearIndependent R v)
{x : ι} (f : ι →₀ R) (h : x ∉ f.support) : Finsupp.total ι M R v f ≠ v x := by
replace h : x ∉ (f.support : Set ι) := h
have p := hv.not_mem_span_image h
intro w
rw [← w] at p
rw [Finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total] at p
simp only [not_exists, not_and, mem_map] at p -- Porting note: `mem_map` isn't currently triggered
exact p f (f.mem_supported_support R) rfl
#align linear_independent.total_ne_of_not_mem_support LinearIndependent.total_ne_of_not_mem_support
theorem linearIndependent_sum {v : Sum ι ι' → M} :
LinearIndependent R v ↔
LinearIndependent R (v ∘ Sum.inl) ∧
LinearIndependent R (v ∘ Sum.inr) ∧
Disjoint (Submodule.span R (range (v ∘ Sum.inl)))
(Submodule.span R (range (v ∘ Sum.inr))) := by
classical
rw [range_comp v, range_comp v]
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· intro h
refine ⟨h.comp _ Sum.inl_injective, h.comp _ Sum.inr_injective, ?_⟩
refine h.disjoint_span_image ?_
-- Porting note: `isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.1` timeouts.
exact IsCompl.disjoint isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
rintro ⟨hl, hr, hlr⟩
rw [linearIndependent_iff'] at *
intro s g hg i hi
have :
((∑ i ∈ s.preimage Sum.inl Sum.inl_injective.injOn, (fun x => g x • v x) (Sum.inl i)) +
∑ i ∈ s.preimage Sum.inr Sum.inr_injective.injOn, (fun x => g x • v x) (Sum.inr i)) =
0 := by
-- Porting note: `g` must be specified.
rw [Finset.sum_preimage' (g := fun x => g x • v x),
Finset.sum_preimage' (g := fun x => g x • v x), ← Finset.sum_union, ← Finset.filter_or]
· simpa only [← mem_union, range_inl_union_range_inr, mem_univ, Finset.filter_True]
· -- Porting note: Here was one `exact`, but timeouted.
refine Finset.disjoint_filter.2 fun x _ hx =>
disjoint_left.1 ?_ hx
exact IsCompl.disjoint isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
rw [← eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero] at this
rw [disjoint_def'] at hlr
have A := by
refine hlr _ (sum_mem fun i _ => ?_) _ (neg_mem <| sum_mem fun i _ => ?_) this
· exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨Sum.inl i, mem_range_self _, rfl⟩)
· exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨Sum.inr i, mem_range_self _, rfl⟩)
cases' i with i i
· exact hl _ _ A i (Finset.mem_preimage.2 hi)
· rw [this, neg_eq_zero] at A
exact hr _ _ A i (Finset.mem_preimage.2 hi)
#align linear_independent_sum linearIndependent_sum
theorem LinearIndependent.sum_type {v' : ι' → M} (hv : LinearIndependent R v)
(hv' : LinearIndependent R v')
(h : Disjoint (Submodule.span R (range v)) (Submodule.span R (range v'))) :
LinearIndependent R (Sum.elim v v') :=
linearIndependent_sum.2 ⟨hv, hv', h⟩
#align linear_independent.sum_type LinearIndependent.sum_type
theorem LinearIndependent.union {s t : Set M} (hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M))
(ht : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : t → M)) (hst : Disjoint (span R s) (span R t)) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : ↥(s ∪ t) → M) :=
(hs.sum_type ht <| by simpa).to_subtype_range' <| by simp
#align linear_independent.union LinearIndependent.union
theorem linearIndependent_iUnion_finite_subtype {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set M}
(hl : ∀ i, LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : f i → M))
(hd : ∀ i, ∀ t : Set ι, t.Finite → i ∉ t → Disjoint (span R (f i)) (⨆ i ∈ t, span R (f i))) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : (⋃ i, f i) → M) := by
classical
rw [iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset f]
apply linearIndependent_iUnion_of_directed
· apply directed_of_isDirected_le
exact fun t₁ t₂ ht => iUnion_mono fun i => iUnion_subset_iUnion_const fun h => ht h
intro t
induction' t using Finset.induction_on with i s his ih
· refine (linearIndependent_empty R M).mono ?_
simp
· rw [Finset.set_biUnion_insert]
refine (hl _).union ih ?_
rw [span_iUnion₂]
exact hd i s s.finite_toSet his
#align linear_independent_Union_finite_subtype linearIndependent_iUnion_finite_subtype
theorem linearIndependent_iUnion_finite {η : Type*} {ιs : η → Type*} {f : ∀ j : η, ιs j → M}
(hindep : ∀ j, LinearIndependent R (f j))
(hd : ∀ i, ∀ t : Set η,
t.Finite → i ∉ t → Disjoint (span R (range (f i))) (⨆ i ∈ t, span R (range (f i)))) :
LinearIndependent R fun ji : Σ j, ιs j => f ji.1 ji.2 := by
nontriviality R
apply LinearIndependent.of_subtype_range
· rintro ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ hxy
by_cases h_cases : x₁ = y₁
· subst h_cases
refine Sigma.eq rfl ?_
rw [LinearIndependent.injective (hindep _) hxy]
· have h0 : f x₁ x₂ = 0 := by
apply
disjoint_def.1 (hd x₁ {y₁} (finite_singleton y₁) fun h => h_cases (eq_of_mem_singleton h))
(f x₁ x₂) (subset_span (mem_range_self _))
rw [iSup_singleton]
simp only at hxy
rw [hxy]
exact subset_span (mem_range_self y₂)
exact False.elim ((hindep x₁).ne_zero _ h0)
rw [range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range]
apply linearIndependent_iUnion_finite_subtype (fun j => (hindep j).to_subtype_range) hd
#align linear_independent_Union_finite linearIndependent_iUnion_finite
end Subtype
section repr
variable (hv : LinearIndependent R v)
/-- Canonical isomorphism between linear combinations and the span of linearly independent vectors.
-/
@[simps (config := { rhsMd := default }) symm_apply]
def LinearIndependent.totalEquiv (hv : LinearIndependent R v) :
(ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] span R (range v) := by
apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective (LinearMap.codRestrict (span R (range v)) (Finsupp.total ι M R v) _)
constructor
· rw [← LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, LinearMap.ker_codRestrict]
· apply hv
· intro l
rw [← Finsupp.range_total]
rw [LinearMap.mem_range]
apply mem_range_self l
· rw [← LinearMap.range_eq_top, LinearMap.range_eq_map, LinearMap.map_codRestrict, ←
LinearMap.range_le_iff_comap, range_subtype, Submodule.map_top]
rw [Finsupp.range_total]
#align linear_independent.total_equiv LinearIndependent.totalEquiv
#align linear_independent.total_equiv_symm_apply LinearIndependent.totalEquiv_symm_apply
-- Porting note: The original theorem generated by `simps` was
-- different from the theorem on Lean 3, and not simp-normal form.
@[simp]
theorem LinearIndependent.totalEquiv_apply_coe (hv : LinearIndependent R v) (l : ι →₀ R) :
hv.totalEquiv l = Finsupp.total ι M R v l := rfl
#align linear_independent.total_equiv_apply_coe LinearIndependent.totalEquiv_apply_coe
/-- Linear combination representing a vector in the span of linearly independent vectors.
Given a family of linearly independent vectors, we can represent any vector in their span as
a linear combination of these vectors. These are provided by this linear map.
It is simply one direction of `LinearIndependent.total_equiv`. -/
def LinearIndependent.repr (hv : LinearIndependent R v) : span R (range v) →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R :=
hv.totalEquiv.symm
#align linear_independent.repr LinearIndependent.repr
@[simp]
theorem LinearIndependent.total_repr (x) : Finsupp.total ι M R v (hv.repr x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 (LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply hv.totalEquiv x)
#align linear_independent.total_repr LinearIndependent.total_repr
theorem LinearIndependent.total_comp_repr :
(Finsupp.total ι M R v).comp hv.repr = Submodule.subtype _ :=
LinearMap.ext <| hv.total_repr
#align linear_independent.total_comp_repr LinearIndependent.total_comp_repr
theorem LinearIndependent.repr_ker : LinearMap.ker hv.repr = ⊥ := by
rw [LinearIndependent.repr, LinearEquiv.ker]
#align linear_independent.repr_ker LinearIndependent.repr_ker
theorem LinearIndependent.repr_range : LinearMap.range hv.repr = ⊤ := by
rw [LinearIndependent.repr, LinearEquiv.range]
#align linear_independent.repr_range LinearIndependent.repr_range
theorem LinearIndependent.repr_eq {l : ι →₀ R} {x : span R (range v)}
(eq : Finsupp.total ι M R v l = ↑x) : hv.repr x = l := by
have :
↑((LinearIndependent.totalEquiv hv : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] span R (range v)) l) =
Finsupp.total ι M R v l :=
rfl
have : (LinearIndependent.totalEquiv hv : (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] span R (range v)) l = x := by
rw [eq] at this
exact Subtype.ext_iff.2 this
rw [← LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply hv.totalEquiv l]
rw [← this]
rfl
#align linear_independent.repr_eq LinearIndependent.repr_eq
theorem LinearIndependent.repr_eq_single (i) (x : span R (range v)) (hx : ↑x = v i) :
hv.repr x = Finsupp.single i 1 := by
apply hv.repr_eq
simp [Finsupp.total_single, hx]
#align linear_independent.repr_eq_single LinearIndependent.repr_eq_single
theorem LinearIndependent.span_repr_eq [Nontrivial R] (x) :
Span.repr R (Set.range v) x =
(hv.repr x).equivMapDomain (Equiv.ofInjective _ hv.injective) := by
have p :
(Span.repr R (Set.range v) x).equivMapDomain (Equiv.ofInjective _ hv.injective).symm =
hv.repr x := by
apply (LinearIndependent.totalEquiv hv).injective
ext
simp only [LinearIndependent.totalEquiv_apply_coe, Equiv.self_comp_ofInjective_symm,
LinearIndependent.total_repr, Finsupp.total_equivMapDomain, Span.finsupp_total_repr]
ext ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩
simp [← p]
#align linear_independent.span_repr_eq LinearIndependent.span_repr_eq
theorem linearIndependent_iff_not_smul_mem_span :
LinearIndependent R v ↔ ∀ (i : ι) (a : R), a • v i ∈ span R (v '' (univ \ {i})) → a = 0 :=
⟨fun hv i a ha => by
rw [Finsupp.span_image_eq_map_total, mem_map] at ha
rcases ha with ⟨l, hl, e⟩
rw [sub_eq_zero.1 (linearIndependent_iff.1 hv (l - Finsupp.single i a) (by simp [e]))] at hl
by_contra hn
exact (not_mem_of_mem_diff (hl <| by simp [hn])) (mem_singleton _), fun H =>
linearIndependent_iff.2 fun l hl => by
ext i; simp only [Finsupp.zero_apply]
by_contra hn
refine hn (H i _ ?_)
refine (Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total R).2 ⟨Finsupp.single i (l i) - l, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Finsupp.mem_supported']
intro j hj
have hij : j = i :=
Classical.not_not.1 fun hij : j ≠ i =>
hj ((mem_diff _).2 ⟨mem_univ _, fun h => hij (eq_of_mem_singleton h)⟩)
simp [hij]
· simp [hl]⟩
#align linear_independent_iff_not_smul_mem_span linearIndependent_iff_not_smul_mem_span
/-- See also `CompleteLattice.independent_iff_linearIndependent_of_ne_zero`. -/
theorem LinearIndependent.independent_span_singleton (hv : LinearIndependent R v) :
CompleteLattice.Independent fun i => R ∙ v i := by
refine CompleteLattice.independent_def.mp fun i => ?_
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
intro m hm
simp only [mem_inf, mem_span_singleton, iSup_subtype'] at hm
rw [← span_range_eq_iSup] at hm
obtain ⟨⟨r, rfl⟩, hm⟩ := hm
suffices r = 0 by simp [this]
apply linearIndependent_iff_not_smul_mem_span.mp hv i
-- Porting note: The original proof was using `convert hm`.
suffices v '' (univ \ {i}) = range fun j : { j // j ≠ i } => v j by
rwa [this]
ext
simp
#align linear_independent.independent_span_singleton LinearIndependent.independent_span_singleton
variable (R)
theorem exists_maximal_independent' (s : ι → M) :
∃ I : Set ι,
(LinearIndependent R fun x : I => s x) ∧
∀ J : Set ι, I ⊆ J → (LinearIndependent R fun x : J => s x) → I = J := by
let indep : Set ι → Prop := fun I => LinearIndependent R (s ∘ (↑) : I → M)
let X := { I : Set ι // indep I }
let r : X → X → Prop := fun I J => I.1 ⊆ J.1
have key : ∀ c : Set X, IsChain r c → indep (⋃ (I : X) (_ : I ∈ c), I) := by
intro c hc
dsimp [indep]
rw [linearIndependent_comp_subtype]
intro f hsupport hsum
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty c with (rfl | hn)
· simpa using hsupport
haveI : IsRefl X r := ⟨fun _ => Set.Subset.refl _⟩
obtain ⟨I, _I_mem, hI⟩ : ∃ I ∈ c, (f.support : Set ι) ⊆ I :=
hc.directedOn.exists_mem_subset_of_finset_subset_biUnion hn hsupport
exact linearIndependent_comp_subtype.mp I.2 f hI hsum
have trans : Transitive r := fun I J K => Set.Subset.trans
obtain ⟨⟨I, hli : indep I⟩, hmax : ∀ a, r ⟨I, hli⟩ a → r a ⟨I, hli⟩⟩ :=
exists_maximal_of_chains_bounded
(fun c hc => ⟨⟨⋃ I ∈ c, (I : Set ι), key c hc⟩, fun I => Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem⟩) @trans
exact ⟨I, hli, fun J hsub hli => Set.Subset.antisymm hsub (hmax ⟨J, hli⟩ hsub)⟩
#align exists_maximal_independent' exists_maximal_independent'
theorem exists_maximal_independent (s : ι → M) :
∃ I : Set ι,
(LinearIndependent R fun x : I => s x) ∧
∀ i ∉ I, ∃ a : R, a ≠ 0 ∧ a • s i ∈ span R (s '' I) := by
classical
rcases exists_maximal_independent' R s with ⟨I, hIlinind, hImaximal⟩
use I, hIlinind
intro i hi
specialize hImaximal (I ∪ {i}) (by simp)
set J := I ∪ {i} with hJ
have memJ : ∀ {x}, x ∈ J ↔ x = i ∨ x ∈ I := by simp [hJ]
have hiJ : i ∈ J := by simp [J]
have h := by
refine mt hImaximal ?_
· intro h2
rw [h2] at hi
exact absurd hiJ hi
obtain ⟨f, supp_f, sum_f, f_ne⟩ := linearDependent_comp_subtype.mp h
have hfi : f i ≠ 0 := by
contrapose hIlinind
refine linearDependent_comp_subtype.mpr ⟨f, ?_, sum_f, f_ne⟩
simp only [Finsupp.mem_supported, hJ] at supp_f ⊢
rintro x hx
refine (memJ.mp (supp_f hx)).resolve_left ?_
rintro rfl
exact hIlinind (Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp hx)
use f i, hfi
have hfi' : i ∈ f.support := Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr hfi
rw [← Finset.insert_erase hfi', Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _),
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at sum_f
rw [sum_f]
refine neg_mem (sum_mem fun c hc => smul_mem _ _ (subset_span ⟨c, ?_, rfl⟩))
exact (memJ.mp (supp_f (Finset.erase_subset _ _ hc))).resolve_left (Finset.ne_of_mem_erase hc)
#align exists_maximal_independent exists_maximal_independent
end repr
theorem surjective_of_linearIndependent_of_span [Nontrivial R] (hv : LinearIndependent R v)
(f : ι' ↪ ι) (hss : range v ⊆ span R (range (v ∘ f))) : Surjective f := by
intro i
let repr : (span R (range (v ∘ f)) : Type _) → ι' →₀ R := (hv.comp f f.injective).repr
let l := (repr ⟨v i, hss (mem_range_self i)⟩).mapDomain f
have h_total_l : Finsupp.total ι M R v l = v i := by
dsimp only [l]
rw [Finsupp.total_mapDomain]
rw [(hv.comp f f.injective).total_repr]
-- Porting note: `rfl` isn't necessary.
have h_total_eq : (Finsupp.total ι M R v) l = (Finsupp.total ι M R v) (Finsupp.single i 1) := by
rw [h_total_l, Finsupp.total_single, one_smul]
have l_eq : l = _ := LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.1 hv h_total_eq
dsimp only [l] at l_eq
rw [← Finsupp.embDomain_eq_mapDomain] at l_eq
rcases Finsupp.single_of_embDomain_single (repr ⟨v i, _⟩) f i (1 : R) zero_ne_one.symm l_eq with
⟨i', hi'⟩
use i'
exact hi'.2
#align surjective_of_linear_independent_of_span surjective_of_linearIndependent_of_span
theorem eq_of_linearIndependent_of_span_subtype [Nontrivial R] {s t : Set M}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M)) (h : t ⊆ s) (hst : s ⊆ span R t) : s = t := by
let f : t ↪ s :=
⟨fun x => ⟨x.1, h x.2⟩, fun a b hab => Subtype.coe_injective (Subtype.mk.inj hab)⟩
have h_surj : Surjective f := by
apply surjective_of_linearIndependent_of_span hs f _
convert hst <;> simp [f, comp]
show s = t
apply Subset.antisymm _ h
intro x hx
rcases h_surj ⟨x, hx⟩ with ⟨y, hy⟩
convert y.mem
rw [← Subtype.mk.inj hy]
#align eq_of_linear_independent_of_span_subtype eq_of_linearIndependent_of_span_subtype
open LinearMap
theorem LinearIndependent.image_subtype {s : Set M} {f : M →ₗ[R] M'}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M))
(hf_inj : Disjoint (span R s) (LinearMap.ker f)) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : f '' s → M') := by
rw [← Subtype.range_coe (s := s)] at hf_inj
refine (hs.map hf_inj).to_subtype_range' ?_
simp [Set.range_comp f]
#align linear_independent.image_subtype LinearIndependent.image_subtype
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/LinearIndependent.lean | 1,101 | 1,108 | theorem LinearIndependent.inl_union_inr {s : Set M} {t : Set M'}
(hs : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : s → M))
(ht : LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : t → M')) :
LinearIndependent R (fun x => x : ↥(inl R M M' '' s ∪ inr R M M' '' t) → M × M') := by |
refine (hs.image_subtype ?_).union (ht.image_subtype ?_) ?_ <;> [simp; simp; skip]
-- Note: #8386 had to change `span_image` into `span_image _`
simp only [span_image _]
simp [disjoint_iff, prod_inf_prod]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.RBMap.Alter
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
/-!
# Additional lemmas for Red-black trees
-/
namespace Batteries
namespace RBNode
open RBColor
attribute [simp] fold foldl foldr Any forM foldlM Ordered
@[simp] theorem min?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.min? = t.max? := by
unfold RBNode.max?; split <;> simp [RBNode.min?]
unfold RBNode.min?; rw [min?.match_1.eq_3]
· apply min?_reverse
· simpa [reverse_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem max?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.max? = t.min? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_nil {x} : ¬x ∈ (.nil : RBNode α) := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
@[simp] theorem mem_node {y c a x b} :
y ∈ (.node c a x b : RBNode α) ↔ y = x ∨ y ∈ a ∨ y ∈ b := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
theorem All_def {t : RBNode α} : t.All p ↔ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_imp, forall_and, *]
theorem Any_def {t : RBNode α} : t.Any p ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_and_right, exists_or, *]
theorem memP_def : MemP cut t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_def : Mem cmp x t ↔ ∃ y ∈ t, cmp x y = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} (h : cmp x y = .eq) :
Mem cmp x t ↔ Mem cmp y t := by simp [Mem, TransCmp.cmp_congr_left' h]
theorem isOrdered_iff' [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t L R ↔
(∀ a ∈ L, t.All (cmpLT cmp a ·)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ R, t.All (cmpLT cmp · a)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ L, ∀ b ∈ R, cmpLT cmp a b) ∧
Ordered cmp t := by
induction t generalizing L R with
| nil =>
simp [isOrdered]; split <;> simp [cmpLT_iff]
next h => intro _ ha _ hb; cases h _ _ ha hb
| node _ l v r =>
simp [isOrdered, *]
exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨Ll, lv, Lv, ol⟩, ⟨vr, rR, vR, or⟩⟩ => ⟨
fun _ h => ⟨Lv _ h, Ll _ h, (Lv _ h).trans_l vr⟩,
fun _ h => ⟨vR _ h, (vR _ h).trans_r lv, rR _ h⟩,
fun _ hL _ hR => (Lv _ hL).trans (vR _ hR),
lv, vr, ol, or⟩,
fun ⟨hL, hR, _, lv, vr, ol, or⟩ => ⟨
⟨fun _ h => (hL _ h).2.1, lv, fun _ h => (hL _ h).1, ol⟩,
⟨vr, fun _ h => (hR _ h).2.2, fun _ h => (hR _ h).1, or⟩⟩⟩
theorem isOrdered_iff [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t ↔ Ordered cmp t := by simp [isOrdered_iff']
instance (cmp) [@TransCmp α cmp] (t) : Decidable (Ordered cmp t) := decidable_of_iff _ isOrdered_iff
/--
A cut is like a homomorphism of orderings: it is a monotonic predicate with respect to `cmp`,
but it can make things that are distinguished by `cmp` equal.
This is sufficient for `find?` to locate an element on which `cut` returns `.eq`,
but there may be other elements, not returned by `find?`, on which `cut` also returns `.eq`.
-/
class IsCut (cmp : α → α → Ordering) (cut : α → Ordering) : Prop where
/-- The set `{x | cut x = .lt}` is downward-closed. -/
le_lt_trans [TransCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cut x = .lt → cut y = .lt
/-- The set `{x | cut x = .gt}` is upward-closed. -/
le_gt_trans [TransCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cut y = .gt → cut x = .gt
theorem IsCut.lt_trans [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp]
(H : cmp x y = .lt) : cut x = .lt → cut y = .lt :=
IsCut.le_lt_trans <| TransCmp.gt_asymm <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 H
theorem IsCut.gt_trans [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp]
(H : cmp x y = .lt) : cut y = .gt → cut x = .gt :=
IsCut.le_gt_trans <| TransCmp.gt_asymm <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 H
theorem IsCut.congr [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp] (H : cmp x y = .eq) : cut x = cut y := by
cases ey : cut y
· exact IsCut.le_lt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h) ey
· cases ex : cut x
· exact IsCut.le_lt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans h) ex |>.symm.trans ey
· rfl
· refine IsCut.le_gt_trans (cmp := cmp) (fun h => ?_) ex |>.symm.trans ey
cases H.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h
· exact IsCut.le_gt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans h) ey
instance (cmp cut) [@IsCut α cmp cut] : IsCut (flip cmp) (cut · |>.swap) where
le_lt_trans h₁ h₂ := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [IsCut.le_gt_trans (cmp := cmp) h₁ (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h₂)]; rfl
le_gt_trans h₁ h₂ := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [IsCut.le_lt_trans (cmp := cmp) h₁ (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h₂)]; rfl
/--
`IsStrictCut` upgrades the `IsCut` property to ensure that at most one element of the tree
can match the cut, and hence `find?` will return the unique such element if one exists.
-/
class IsStrictCut (cmp : α → α → Ordering) (cut : α → Ordering) extends IsCut cmp cut : Prop where
/-- If `cut = x`, then `cut` and `x` have compare the same with respect to other elements. -/
exact [TransCmp cmp] : cut x = .eq → cmp x y = cut y
/-- A "representable cut" is one generated by `cmp a` for some `a`. This is always a valid cut. -/
instance (cmp) (a : α) : IsStrictCut cmp (cmp a) where
le_lt_trans h₁ h₂ := TransCmp.lt_le_trans h₂ h₁
le_gt_trans h₁ := Decidable.not_imp_not.1 (TransCmp.le_trans · h₁)
exact h := (TransCmp.cmp_congr_left h).symm
instance (cmp cut) [@IsStrictCut α cmp cut] : IsStrictCut (flip cmp) (cut · |>.swap) where
exact h := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [← IsStrictCut.exact (cmp := cmp) (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h), OrientedCmp.symm]; rfl
section fold
theorem foldr_cons (t : RBNode α) (l) : t.foldr (·::·) l = t.toList ++ l := by
unfold toList
induction t generalizing l with
| nil => rfl
| node _ a _ b iha ihb => rw [foldr, foldr, iha, iha (_::_), ihb]; simp
@[simp] theorem toList_nil : (.nil : RBNode α).toList = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_node : (.node c a x b : RBNode α).toList = a.toList ++ x :: b.toList := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons]; rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.toList = t.toList.reverse := by
induction t <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem mem_toList {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.toList ↔ x ∈ t := by
induction t <;> simp [*, or_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {t : RBNode α} : a ∈ t.reverse ↔ a ∈ t := by rw [← mem_toList]; simp
theorem min?_eq_toList_head? {t : RBNode α} : t.min? = t.toList.head? := by
induction t with
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ _ ih =>
cases l <;> simp [RBNode.min?, ih]
next ll _ _ => cases toList ll <;> rfl
theorem max?_eq_toList_getLast? {t : RBNode α} : t.max? = t.toList.getLast? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, min?_eq_toList_head?]; simp
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.foldr f init = t.toList.foldr f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem foldl_reverse {α β : Type _} {t : RBNode α} {f : β → α → β} {init : β} :
t.reverse.foldl f init = t.foldr (flip f) init := by
simp (config := {unfoldPartialApp := true})
[foldr_eq_foldr_toList, foldl_eq_foldl_toList, flip]
theorem foldr_reverse {α β : Type _} {t : RBNode α} {f : α → β → β} {init : β} :
t.reverse.foldr f init = t.foldl (flip f) init :=
foldl_reverse.symm.trans (by simp; rfl)
theorem forM_eq_forM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
t.forM (m := m) f = t.toList.forM f := by induction t <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
t.foldlM (m := m) f init = t.toList.foldlM f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem forIn_visit_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn.visit (m := m) f t init = (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f t.toList := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*, forIn.visit]
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := by
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn, RBNode.forIn]
rw [List.forIn_eq_bindList, forIn_visit_eq_bindList]
end fold
namespace Stream
attribute [simp] foldl foldr
theorem foldr_cons (t : RBNode.Stream α) (l) : t.foldr (·::·) l = t.toList ++ l := by
unfold toList; apply Eq.symm; induction t <;> simp [*, foldr, RBNode.foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem toList_nil : (.nil : RBNode.Stream α).toList = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_cons :
(.cons x r s : RBNode.Stream α).toList = x :: r.toList ++ s.toList := by
rw [toList, toList, foldr, RBNode.foldr_cons]; rfl
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {s : RBNode.Stream α} : s.foldr f init = s.toList.foldr f init := by
induction s <;> simp [*, RBNode.foldr_eq_foldr_toList]
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBNode.Stream α} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*, RBNode.foldl_eq_foldl_toList]
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := by
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn, RBNode.forIn]
rw [List.forIn_eq_bindList, forIn_visit_eq_bindList]
end Stream
theorem toStream_toList' {t : RBNode α} {s} : (t.toStream s).toList = t.toList ++ s.toList := by
induction t generalizing s <;> simp [*, toStream]
@[simp] theorem toStream_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.toStream.toList = t.toList := by
simp [toStream_toList']
theorem Stream.next?_toList {s : RBNode.Stream α} :
(s.next?.map fun (a, b) => (a, b.toList)) = s.toList.next? := by
cases s <;> simp [next?, toStream_toList']
theorem ordered_iff {t : RBNode α} :
t.Ordered cmp ↔ t.toList.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) := by
induction t with
| nil => simp
| node c l v r ihl ihr =>
simp [*, List.pairwise_append, Ordered, All_def,
and_assoc, and_left_comm, and_comm, imp_and, forall_and]
exact fun _ _ hl hr a ha b hb => (hl _ ha).trans (hr _ hb)
theorem Ordered.toList_sorted {t : RBNode α} : t.Ordered cmp → t.toList.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) :=
ordered_iff.1
theorem min?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.min? = some a) : a ∈ t := by
rw [min?_eq_toList_head?] at h
rw [← mem_toList]
revert h; cases toList t <;> rintro ⟨⟩; constructor
theorem Ordered.min?_le {t : RBNode α} [TransCmp cmp] (ht : t.Ordered cmp) (h : t.min? = some a)
(x) (hx : x ∈ t) : cmp a x ≠ .gt := by
rw [min?_eq_toList_head?] at h
rw [← mem_toList] at hx
have := ht.toList_sorted
revert h hx this; cases toList t <;> rintro ⟨⟩ (_ | ⟨_, hx⟩) (_ | ⟨h1,h2⟩)
· rw [OrientedCmp.cmp_refl (cmp := cmp)]; decide
· rw [(h1 _ hx).1]; decide
theorem max?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.max? = some a) : a ∈ t := by
simpa using min?_mem ((min?_reverse _).trans h)
theorem Ordered.le_max? {t : RBNode α} [TransCmp cmp] (ht : t.Ordered cmp) (h : t.max? = some a)
(x) (hx : x ∈ t) : cmp x a ≠ .gt :=
ht.reverse.min?_le ((min?_reverse _).trans h) _ (by simpa using hx)
@[simp] theorem setBlack_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.setBlack.toList = t.toList := by
cases t <;> simp [setBlack]
@[simp] theorem setRed_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.setRed.toList = t.toList := by
cases t <;> simp [setRed]
@[simp] theorem balance1_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balance1 v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balance1; split <;> simp
@[simp] theorem balance2_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balance2 v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balance2; split <;> simp
@[simp] theorem balLeft_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balLeft v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balLeft; split <;> (try simp); split <;> simp
@[simp] theorem balRight_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balRight v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balRight; split <;> (try simp); split <;> simp
theorem size_eq {t : RBNode α} : t.size = t.toList.length := by
induction t <;> simp [*, size]; rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_size (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.size = t.size := by simp [size_eq]
@[simp] theorem Any_reverse {t : RBNode α} : t.reverse.Any p ↔ t.Any p := by simp [Any_def]
@[simp] theorem memP_reverse {t : RBNode α} : MemP cut t.reverse ↔ MemP (cut · |>.swap) t := by
simp [MemP]; apply Iff.of_eq; congr; funext x; rw [← Ordering.swap_inj]; rfl
theorem Mem_reverse [@OrientedCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
Mem cmp x t.reverse ↔ Mem (flip cmp) x t := by
simp [Mem]; apply Iff.of_eq; congr; funext x; rw [OrientedCmp.symm]; rfl
section find?
theorem find?_some_eq_eq {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.find? cut → cut x = .eq := by
induction t <;> simp [find?]; split <;> try assumption
intro | rfl => assumption
theorem find?_some_mem {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.find? cut → x ∈ t := by
induction t <;> simp [find?]; split <;> simp (config := {contextual := true}) [*]
theorem find?_some_memP {t : RBNode α} (h : x ∈ t.find? cut) : MemP cut t :=
memP_def.2 ⟨_, find?_some_mem h, find?_some_eq_eq h⟩
theorem Ordered.memP_iff_find? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
MemP cut t ↔ ∃ x, t.find? cut = some x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => find?_some_memP h⟩
induction t with simp [find?] at H ⊢
| nil => cases H
| node _ l _ r ihl ihr =>
let ⟨lx, xr, hl, hr⟩ := ht
split
· next ev =>
refine ihl hl ?_
rcases H with ev' | hx | hx
· cases ev.symm.trans ev'
· exact hx
· have ⟨z, hz, ez⟩ := Any_def.1 hx
cases ez.symm.trans <| IsCut.lt_trans (All_def.1 xr _ hz).1 ev
· next ev =>
refine ihr hr ?_
rcases H with ev' | hx | hx
· cases ev.symm.trans ev'
· have ⟨z, hz, ez⟩ := Any_def.1 hx
cases ez.symm.trans <| IsCut.gt_trans (All_def.1 lx _ hz).1 ev
· exact hx
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem Ordered.unique [@TransCmp α cmp] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(hx : x ∈ t) (hy : y ∈ t) (e : cmp x y = .eq) : x = y := by
induction t with
| nil => cases hx
| node _ l _ r ihl ihr =>
let ⟨lx, xr, hl, hr⟩ := ht
rcases hx, hy with ⟨rfl | hx | hx, rfl | hy | hy⟩
· rfl
· cases e.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 (All_def.1 lx _ hy).1
· cases e.symm.trans (All_def.1 xr _ hy).1
· cases e.symm.trans (All_def.1 lx _ hx).1
· exact ihl hl hx hy
· cases e.symm.trans ((All_def.1 lx _ hx).trans (All_def.1 xr _ hy)).1
· cases e.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 (All_def.1 xr _ hx).1
· cases e.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2
((All_def.1 lx _ hy).trans (All_def.1 xr _ hx)).1
· exact ihr hr hx hy
theorem Ordered.find?_some [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
t.find? cut = some x ↔ x ∈ t ∧ cut x = .eq := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨find?_some_mem h, find?_some_eq_eq h⟩, fun ⟨hx, e⟩ => ?_⟩
have ⟨y, hy⟩ := ht.memP_iff_find?.1 (memP_def.2 ⟨_, hx, e⟩)
exact ht.unique hx (find?_some_mem hy) ((IsStrictCut.exact e).trans (find?_some_eq_eq hy)) ▸ hy
@[simp] theorem find?_reverse (t : RBNode α) (cut : α → Ordering) :
t.reverse.find? cut = t.find? (cut · |>.swap) := by
induction t <;> simp [*, find?]
cases cut _ <;> simp [Ordering.swap]
/--
Auxiliary definition for `zoom_ins`: set the root of the tree to `v`, creating a node if necessary.
-/
def setRoot (v : α) : RBNode α → RBNode α
| nil => node red nil v nil
| node c a _ b => node c a v b
/--
Auxiliary definition for `zoom_ins`: set the root of the tree to `v`, creating a node if necessary.
-/
def delRoot : RBNode α → RBNode α
| nil => nil
| node _ a _ b => a.append b
end find?
section «upperBound? and lowerBound?»
@[simp] theorem upperBound?_reverse (t : RBNode α) (cut ub) :
t.reverse.upperBound? cut ub = t.lowerBound? (cut · |>.swap) ub := by
induction t generalizing ub <;> simp [lowerBound?, upperBound?]
split <;> simp [*, Ordering.swap]
@[simp] theorem lowerBound?_reverse (t : RBNode α) (cut lb) :
t.reverse.lowerBound? cut lb = t.upperBound? (cut · |>.swap) lb := by
simpa using (upperBound?_reverse t.reverse (cut · |>.swap) lb).symm
theorem upperBound?_eq_find? {t : RBNode α} {cut} (ub) (H : t.find? cut = some x) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x := by
induction t generalizing ub with simp [find?] at H
| node c a y b iha ihb =>
simp [upperBound?]; split at H
· apply iha _ H
· apply ihb _ H
· exact H
theorem lowerBound?_eq_find? {t : RBNode α} {cut} (lb) (H : t.find? cut = some x) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t] at H ⊢; rw [lowerBound?_reverse]; rw [find?_reverse] at H
exact upperBound?_eq_find? _ H
/-- The value `x` returned by `upperBound?` is greater or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem upperBound?_ge' {t : RBNode α} (H : ∀ {x}, x ∈ ub → cut x ≠ .gt) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x → cut x ≠ .gt := by
induction t generalizing ub with
| nil => exact H
| node _ _ _ _ ihl ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split
· next hv => exact ihl fun | rfl, e => nomatch hv.symm.trans e
· exact ihr H
· next hv => intro | rfl, e => cases hv.symm.trans e
/-- The value `x` returned by `upperBound?` is greater or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem upperBound?_ge {t : RBNode α} : t.upperBound? cut = some x → cut x ≠ .gt :=
upperBound?_ge' nofun
/-- The value `x` returned by `lowerBound?` is less or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem lowerBound?_le' {t : RBNode α} (H : ∀ {x}, x ∈ lb → cut x ≠ .lt) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x → cut x ≠ .lt := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse, Ne, ← Ordering.swap_inj]
exact upperBound?_ge' fun h => by specialize H h; rwa [Ne, ← Ordering.swap_inj] at H
/-- The value `x` returned by `lowerBound?` is less or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem lowerBound?_le {t : RBNode α} : t.lowerBound? cut = some x → cut x ≠ .lt :=
lowerBound?_le' nofun
theorem All.upperBound?_ub {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) (H : ∀ {x}, ub = some x → p x) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x → p x := by
induction t generalizing ub with
| nil => exact H
| node _ _ _ _ ihl ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split
· exact ihl hp.2.1 fun | rfl => hp.1
· exact ihr hp.2.2 H
· exact fun | rfl => hp.1
theorem All.upperBound? {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) : t.upperBound? cut = some x → p x :=
hp.upperBound?_ub nofun
theorem All.lowerBound?_lb {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) (H : ∀ {x}, lb = some x → p x) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x → p x := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse]
exact All.upperBound?_ub (All.reverse.2 hp) H
theorem All.lowerBound? {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) : t.lowerBound? cut = some x → p x :=
hp.lowerBound?_lb nofun
theorem upperBound?_mem_ub {t : RBNode α}
(h : t.upperBound? cut ub = some x) : x ∈ t ∨ ub = some x :=
All.upperBound?_ub (p := fun x => x ∈ t ∨ ub = some x) (All_def.2 fun _ => .inl) Or.inr h
theorem upperBound?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.upperBound? cut = some x) : x ∈ t :=
(upperBound?_mem_ub h).resolve_right nofun
theorem lowerBound?_mem_lb {t : RBNode α}
(h : t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x) : x ∈ t ∨ lb = some x :=
All.lowerBound?_lb (p := fun x => x ∈ t ∨ lb = some x) (All_def.2 fun _ => .inl) Or.inr h
theorem lowerBound?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.lowerBound? cut = some x) : x ∈ t :=
(lowerBound?_mem_lb h).resolve_right nofun
theorem upperBound?_of_some {t : RBNode α} : ∃ x, t.upperBound? cut (some y) = some x := by
induction t generalizing y <;> simp [upperBound?]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem lowerBound?_of_some {t : RBNode α} : ∃ x, t.lowerBound? cut (some y) = some x := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse]; exact upperBound?_of_some
theorem Ordered.upperBound?_exists [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t) :
(∃ x, t.upperBound? cut = some x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x ≠ .gt := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨_, upperBound?_mem hx, upperBound?_ge hx⟩, fun H => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx, e⟩ := H
induction t generalizing x with
| nil => cases hx
| node _ _ _ _ _ ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split
· exact upperBound?_of_some
· rcases hx with rfl | hx | hx
· contradiction
· next hv => cases e <| IsCut.gt_trans (All_def.1 h.1 _ hx).1 hv
· exact ihr h.2.2.2 _ hx e
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_exists [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t) :
(∃ x, t.lowerBound? cut = some x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x ≠ .lt := by
conv => enter [2, 1, x]; rw [Ne, ← Ordering.swap_inj]
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse]
simpa [-Ordering.swap_inj] using h.reverse.upperBound?_exists (cut := (cut · |>.swap))
theorem Ordered.upperBound?_least_ub [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t)
(hub : ∀ {x}, ub = some x → t.All (cmpLT cmp · x)) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x → y ∈ t → cut x = .lt → cmp y x = .lt → cut y = .gt := by
induction t generalizing ub with
| nil => nofun
| node _ _ _ _ ihl ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split <;> rename_i hv <;> rintro h₁ (rfl | hy' | hy') hx h₂
· rcases upperBound?_mem_ub h₁ with h₁ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· cases TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ (All_def.1 h.1 _ h₁).1
· cases TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ h₂
· exact ihl h.2.2.1 (by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩; exact h.1) h₁ hy' hx h₂
· refine (TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ ?_).elim; have := (All_def.1 h.2.1 _ hy').1
rcases upperBound?_mem_ub h₁ with h₁ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· exact TransCmp.lt_trans (All_def.1 h.1 _ h₁).1 this
· exact this
· exact hv
· exact IsCut.gt_trans (cut := cut) (cmp := cmp) (All_def.1 h.1 _ hy').1 hv
· exact ihr h.2.2.2 (fun h => (hub h).2.2) h₁ hy' hx h₂
· cases h₁; cases TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ h₂
· cases h₁; cases hx.symm.trans hv
· cases h₁; cases hx.symm.trans hv
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_greatest_lb [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t)
(hlb : ∀ {x}, lb = some x → t.All (cmpLT cmp x ·)) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x → y ∈ t → cut x = .gt → cmp x y = .lt → cut y = .lt := by
intro h1 h2 h3 h4
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse] at h1
rw [← Ordering.swap_inj] at h3 ⊢
revert h2 h3 h4
simpa [-Ordering.swap_inj] using
h.reverse.upperBound?_least_ub (fun h => All.reverse.2 <| (hlb h).imp .flip) h1
/--
A statement of the least-ness of the result of `upperBound?`. If `x` is the return value of
`upperBound?` and it is strictly greater than the cut, then any other `y < x` in the tree is in fact
strictly less than the cut (so there is no exact match, and nothing closer to the cut).
-/
theorem Ordered.upperBound?_least [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.upperBound? cut = some x) (hy : y ∈ t)
(xy : cmp y x = .lt) (hx : cut x = .lt) : cut y = .gt :=
ht.upperBound?_least_ub (by nofun) H hy hx xy
/--
A statement of the greatest-ness of the result of `lowerBound?`. If `x` is the return value of
`lowerBound?` and it is strictly less than the cut, then any other `y > x` in the tree is in fact
strictly greater than the cut (so there is no exact match, and nothing closer to the cut).
-/
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_greatest [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.lowerBound? cut none = some x) (hy : y ∈ t)
(xy : cmp x y = .lt) (hx : cut x = .gt) : cut y = .lt :=
ht.lowerBound?_greatest_lb (by nofun) H hy hx xy
theorem Ordered.memP_iff_upperBound? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
t.MemP cut ↔ ∃ x, t.upperBound? cut = some x ∧ cut x = .eq := by
refine memP_def.trans ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, ey⟩ => ?_, fun ⟨x, hx, e⟩ => ⟨_, upperBound?_mem hx, e⟩⟩
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht.upperBound?_exists.2 ⟨_, hy, fun h => nomatch ey.symm.trans h⟩
refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩; cases ex : cut x
· cases e : cmp x y
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.lt_trans e ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.congr e |>.symm.trans ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| ht.upperBound?_least hx hy (OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 e) ex
· rfl
· cases upperBound?_ge hx ex
theorem Ordered.memP_iff_lowerBound? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
t.MemP cut ↔ ∃ x, t.lowerBound? cut = some x ∧ cut x = .eq := by
refine memP_def.trans ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, ey⟩ => ?_, fun ⟨x, hx, e⟩ => ⟨_, lowerBound?_mem hx, e⟩⟩
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht.lowerBound?_exists.2 ⟨_, hy, fun h => nomatch ey.symm.trans h⟩
refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩; cases ex : cut x
· cases lowerBound?_le hx ex
· rfl
· cases e : cmp x y
· cases ey.symm.trans <| ht.lowerBound?_greatest hx hy e ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.congr e |>.symm.trans ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.gt_trans (OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 e) ex
/-- A stronger version of `lowerBound?_greatest` that holds when the cut is strict. -/
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_lt [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.lowerBound? cut = some x) (hy : y ∈ t) : cmp x y = .lt ↔ cut y = .lt := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 ?_⟩
· cases e : cut x
· cases lowerBound?_le H e
· exact IsStrictCut.exact e |>.symm.trans h
· exact ht.lowerBound?_greatest H hy h e
· by_contra h'; exact lowerBound?_le H <| IsCut.le_lt_trans (cmp := cmp) (cut := cut) h' h
/-- A stronger version of `upperBound?_least` that holds when the cut is strict. -/
theorem Ordered.lt_upperBound? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.upperBound? cut = some x) (hy : y ∈ t) : cmp y x = .lt ↔ cut y = .gt := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, upperBound?_reverse] at H
rw [← Ordering.swap_inj (o₂ := .gt)]
revert hy; simpa [-Ordering.swap_inj] using ht.reverse.lowerBound?_lt H
end «upperBound? and lowerBound?»
namespace Path
attribute [simp] RootOrdered Ordered
/-- The list of elements to the left of the hole.
(This function is intended for specification purposes only.) -/
@[simp] def listL : Path α → List α
| .root => []
| .left _ parent _ _ => parent.listL
| .right _ l v parent => parent.listL ++ (l.toList ++ [v])
/-- The list of elements to the right of the hole.
(This function is intended for specification purposes only.) -/
@[simp] def listR : Path α → List α
| .root => []
| .left _ parent v r => v :: r.toList ++ parent.listR
| .right _ _ _ parent => parent.listR
/-- Wraps a list of elements with the left and right elements of the path. -/
abbrev withList (p : Path α) (l : List α) : List α := p.listL ++ l ++ p.listR
theorem rootOrdered_iff {p : Path α} (hp : p.Ordered cmp) :
p.RootOrdered cmp v ↔ (∀ a ∈ p.listL, cmpLT cmp a v) ∧ (∀ a ∈ p.listR, cmpLT cmp v a) := by
induction p with
(simp [All_def] at hp; simp [*, and_assoc, and_left_comm, and_comm, or_imp, forall_and])
| left _ _ x _ ih => exact fun vx _ _ _ ha => vx.trans (hp.2.1 _ ha)
| right _ _ x _ ih => exact fun xv _ _ _ ha => (hp.2.1 _ ha).trans xv
theorem ordered_iff {p : Path α} :
p.Ordered cmp ↔ p.listL.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) ∧ p.listR.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) ∧
∀ x ∈ p.listL, ∀ y ∈ p.listR, cmpLT cmp x y := by
induction p with
| root => simp
| left _ _ x _ ih | right _ _ x _ ih => ?_
all_goals
rw [Ordered, and_congr_right_eq fun h => by simp [All_def, rootOrdered_iff h]; rfl]
simp [List.pairwise_append, or_imp, forall_and, ih, RBNode.ordered_iff]
-- FIXME: simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm, and_comm] is really slow here
· exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, xr, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨rL, rR⟩, hr⟩ =>
⟨hL, ⟨⟨xr, xR⟩, hr, hR, rR⟩, Lx, fun _ ha _ hb => rL _ hb _ ha, LR⟩,
fun ⟨hL, ⟨⟨xr, xR⟩, hr, hR, rR⟩, Lx, Lr, LR⟩ =>
⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, xr, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨fun _ ha _ hb => Lr _ hb _ ha, rR⟩, hr⟩⟩
· exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, lx, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨lL, lR⟩, hl⟩ =>
⟨⟨hL, ⟨hl, lx⟩, fun _ ha _ hb => lL _ hb _ ha, Lx⟩, hR, LR, lR, xR⟩,
fun ⟨⟨hL, ⟨hl, lx⟩, Ll, Lx⟩, hR, LR, lR, xR⟩ =>
⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, lx, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨fun _ ha _ hb => Ll _ hb _ ha, lR⟩, hl⟩⟩
theorem zoom_zoomed₁ (e : zoom cut t path = (t', path')) : t'.OnRoot (cut · = .eq) :=
match t, e with
| nil, rfl => trivial
| node .., e => by
revert e; unfold zoom; split
· exact zoom_zoomed₁
· exact zoom_zoomed₁
· next H => intro e; cases e; exact H
@[simp] theorem fill_toList {p : Path α} : (p.fill t).toList = p.withList t.toList := by
induction p generalizing t <;> simp [*]
theorem _root_.Batteries.RBNode.zoom_toList {t : RBNode α} (eq : t.zoom cut = (t', p')) :
p'.withList t'.toList = t.toList := by rw [← fill_toList, ← zoom_fill eq]; rfl
@[simp] theorem ins_toList {p : Path α} : (p.ins t).toList = p.withList t.toList := by
match p with
| .root | .left red .. | .right red .. | .left black .. | .right black .. =>
simp [ins, ins_toList]
@[simp] theorem insertNew_toList {p : Path α} : (p.insertNew v).toList = p.withList [v] := by
simp [insertNew]
theorem insert_toList {p : Path α} :
(p.insert t v).toList = p.withList (t.setRoot v).toList := by
simp [insert]; split <;> simp [setRoot]
protected theorem Balanced.insert {path : Path α} (hp : path.Balanced c₀ n₀ c n) :
t.Balanced c n → ∃ c n, (path.insert t v).Balanced c n
| .nil => ⟨_, hp.insertNew⟩
| .red ha hb => ⟨_, _, hp.fill (.red ha hb)⟩
| .black ha hb => ⟨_, _, hp.fill (.black ha hb)⟩
theorem Ordered.insert : ∀ {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α},
path.Ordered cmp → t.Ordered cmp → t.All (path.RootOrdered cmp) → path.RootOrdered cmp v →
t.OnRoot (cmpEq cmp v) → (path.insert t v).Ordered cmp
| _, nil, hp, _, _, vp, _ => hp.insertNew vp
| _, node .., hp, ⟨ax, xb, ha, hb⟩, ⟨_, ap, bp⟩, vp, xv => Ordered.fill.2
⟨hp, ⟨ax.imp xv.lt_congr_right.2, xb.imp xv.lt_congr_left.2, ha, hb⟩, vp, ap, bp⟩
theorem Ordered.erase : ∀ {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α},
path.Ordered cmp → t.Ordered cmp → t.All (path.RootOrdered cmp) → (path.erase t).Ordered cmp
| _, nil, hp, ht, tp => Ordered.fill.2 ⟨hp, ht, tp⟩
| _, node .., hp, ⟨ax, xb, ha, hb⟩, ⟨_, ap, bp⟩ => hp.del (ha.append ax xb hb) (ap.append bp)
theorem zoom_ins {t : RBNode α} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} :
t.zoom (cmp v) path = (t', path') →
path.ins (t.ins cmp v) = path'.ins (t'.setRoot v) := by
unfold RBNode.ins; split <;> simp [zoom]
· intro | rfl, rfl => rfl
all_goals
· split
· exact zoom_ins
· exact zoom_ins
· intro | rfl => rfl
theorem insertNew_eq_insert (h : zoom (cmp v) t = (nil, path)) :
path.insertNew v = (t.insert cmp v).setBlack :=
insert_setBlack .. ▸ (zoom_ins h).symm
theorem ins_eq_fill {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α} :
path.Balanced c₀ n₀ c n → t.Balanced c n → path.ins t = (path.fill t).setBlack
| .root, h => rfl
| .redL hb H, ha | .redR ha H, hb => by unfold ins; exact ins_eq_fill H (.red ha hb)
| .blackL hb H, ha => by rw [ins, fill, ← ins_eq_fill H (.black ha hb), balance1_eq ha]
| .blackR ha H, hb => by rw [ins, fill, ← ins_eq_fill H (.black ha hb), balance2_eq hb]
theorem zoom_insert {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α} (ht : t.Balanced c n)
(H : zoom (cmp v) t = (t', path)) :
(path.insert t' v).setBlack = (t.insert cmp v).setBlack := by
have ⟨_, _, ht', hp'⟩ := ht.zoom .root H
cases ht' with simp [insert]
| nil => simp [insertNew_eq_insert H, setBlack_idem]
| red hl hr => rw [← ins_eq_fill hp' (.red hl hr), insert_setBlack]; exact (zoom_ins H).symm
| black hl hr => rw [← ins_eq_fill hp' (.black hl hr), insert_setBlack]; exact (zoom_ins H).symm
theorem zoom_del {t : RBNode α} :
t.zoom cut path = (t', path') →
path.del (t.del cut) (match t with | node c .. => c | _ => red) =
path'.del t'.delRoot (match t' with | node c .. => c | _ => red) := by
unfold RBNode.del; split <;> simp [zoom]
· intro | rfl, rfl => rfl
· next c a y b =>
split
· have IH := @zoom_del (t := a)
match a with
| nil => intro | rfl => rfl
| node black .. | node red .. => apply IH
· have IH := @zoom_del (t := b)
match b with
| nil => intro | rfl => rfl
| node black .. | node red .. => apply IH
· intro | rfl => rfl
/-- Asserts that `p` holds on all elements to the left of the hole. -/
def AllL (p : α → Prop) : Path α → Prop
| .root => True
| .left _ parent _ _ => parent.AllL p
| .right _ a x parent => a.All p ∧ p x ∧ parent.AllL p
/-- Asserts that `p` holds on all elements to the right of the hole. -/
def AllR (p : α → Prop) : Path α → Prop
| .root => True
| .left _ parent x b => parent.AllR p ∧ p x ∧ b.All p
| .right _ _ _ parent => parent.AllR p
end Path
theorem insert_toList_zoom {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (t', p)) :
(t.insert cmp v).toList = p.withList (t'.setRoot v).toList := by
rw [← setBlack_toList, ← Path.zoom_insert ht e, setBlack_toList, Path.insert_toList]
theorem insert_toList_zoom_nil {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (nil, p)) :
(t.insert cmp v).toList = p.withList [v] := insert_toList_zoom ht e
theorem exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (nil, p)) :
∃ L R, t.toList = L ++ R ∧ (t.insert cmp v).toList = L ++ v :: R :=
⟨p.listL, p.listR, by simp [← zoom_toList e, insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e]⟩
theorem insert_toList_zoom_node {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (node c' l v' r, p)) :
(t.insert cmp v).toList = p.withList (node c l v r).toList := insert_toList_zoom ht e
theorem exists_insert_toList_zoom_node {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (node c' l v' r, p)) :
∃ L R, t.toList = L ++ v' :: R ∧ (t.insert cmp v).toList = L ++ v :: R := by
refine ⟨p.listL ++ l.toList, r.toList ++ p.listR, ?_⟩
simp [← zoom_toList e, insert_toList_zoom_node ht e]
theorem mem_insert_self {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) : v ∈ t.insert cmp v := by
rw [← mem_toList, List.mem_iff_append]
exact match e : zoom (cmp v) t with
| (nil, p) => let ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e; ⟨_, _, h⟩
| (node .., p) => let ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_node ht e; ⟨_, _, h⟩
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (h : v' ∈ t) :
v' ∈ t.insert cmp v ∨ cmp v v' = .eq := by
match e : zoom (cmp v) t with
| (nil, p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₁] at h
simp [← mem_toList, h₂]; cases h <;> simp [*]
| (node .., p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_node ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₁] at h
simp [← mem_toList, h₂]; rcases h with h|h|h <;> simp [*]
exact .inr (Path.zoom_zoomed₁ e)
theorem exists_find?_insert_self [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut]
{t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (ht₂ : Ordered cmp t) (hv : cut v = .eq) :
∃ x, (t.insert cmp v).find? cut = some x :=
ht₂.insert.memP_iff_find?.1 <| memP_def.2 ⟨_, mem_insert_self ht, hv⟩
theorem find?_insert_self [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut]
{t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (ht₂ : Ordered cmp t) (hv : cut v = .eq) :
(t.insert cmp v).find? cut = some v :=
ht₂.insert.find?_some.2 ⟨mem_insert_self ht, hv⟩
theorem mem_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (ht₂ : Ordered cmp t) :
v' ∈ t.insert cmp v ↔ (v' ∈ t ∧ t.find? (cmp v) ≠ some v') ∨ v' = v := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun | .inl ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ?_ | .inr h => ?_⟩
· match e : zoom (cmp v) t with
| (nil, p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₂] at h; rw [← or_assoc, or_right_comm] at h
refine h.imp_left fun h => ?_
simp [← mem_toList, h₁, h]
rw [find?_eq_zoom, e]; nofun
| (node .., p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_node ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₂] at h; simp [← mem_toList, h₁]; rw [or_left_comm] at h ⊢
rcases h with _|h <;> simp [*]
refine .inl fun h => ?_
rw [find?_eq_zoom, e] at h; cases h
suffices cmpLT cmp v' v' by cases OrientedCmp.cmp_refl.symm.trans this.1
have := ht₂.toList_sorted; simp [h₁, List.pairwise_append] at this
exact h.elim (this.2.2 _ · |>.1) (this.2.1.1 _)
· exact (mem_insert_of_mem ht h₁).resolve_right fun h' => h₂ <| ht₂.find?_some.2 ⟨h₁, h'⟩
· exact h ▸ mem_insert_self ht
end RBNode
open RBNode (IsCut IsStrictCut)
namespace RBSet
@[simp] theorem val_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.1.toList = t.toList := rfl
@[simp] theorem mkRBSet_eq : mkRBSet α cmp = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_eq : @RBSet.empty α cmp = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem default_eq : (default : RBSet α cmp) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_toList : toList (∅ : RBSet α cmp) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem single_toList : toList (single a : RBSet α cmp) = [a] := rfl
theorem mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : x ∈ toList t ↔ x ∈ t.1 := RBNode.mem_toList
theorem mem_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : cmp x y = .eq) : x ∈ t ↔ y ∈ t :=
RBNode.mem_congr h
theorem mem_iff_mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : x ∈ t ↔ ∃ y ∈ toList t, cmp x y = .eq :=
RBNode.mem_def.trans <| by simp [mem_toList]
theorem mem_of_mem_toList [@OrientedCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : x ∈ toList t) : x ∈ t :=
mem_iff_mem_toList.2 ⟨_, h, OrientedCmp.cmp_refl⟩
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init :=
RBNode.foldl_eq_foldl_toList
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.foldr f init = t.toList.foldr f init :=
RBNode.foldr_eq_foldr_toList
theorem foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.foldlM (m := m) f init = t.toList.foldlM f init := RBNode.foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList
theorem forM_eq_forM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.forM (m := m) f = t.toList.forM f := RBNode.forM_eq_forM_toList
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := RBNode.forIn_eq_forIn_toList
theorem toStream_eq {t : RBSet α cmp} : toStream t = t.1.toStream .nil := rfl
@[simp] theorem toStream_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : (toStream t).toList = t.toList := by
simp [toStream_eq]
theorem isEmpty_iff_toList_eq_nil {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.isEmpty ↔ t.toList = [] := by obtain ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩ := t <;> simp [toList, isEmpty]
theorem toList_sorted {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.toList.Pairwise (RBNode.cmpLT cmp) :=
t.2.out.1.toList_sorted
theorem findP?_some_eq_eq {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.findP? cut = some y → cut y = .eq :=
RBNode.find?_some_eq_eq
theorem find?_some_eq_eq {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.find? x = some y → cmp x y = .eq :=
findP?_some_eq_eq
theorem findP?_some_mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.findP? cut = some y) : y ∈ toList t :=
mem_toList.2 <| RBNode.find?_some_mem h
theorem find?_some_mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.find? x = some y) : y ∈ toList t :=
findP?_some_mem_toList h
theorem findP?_some_memP {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.findP? cut = some y) : t.MemP cut :=
RBNode.find?_some_memP h
theorem find?_some_mem {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.find? x = some y) : x ∈ t :=
findP?_some_memP h
theorem mem_toList_unique [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp}
(hx : x ∈ toList t) (hy : y ∈ toList t) (e : cmp x y = .eq) : x = y :=
t.2.out.1.unique (mem_toList.1 hx) (mem_toList.1 hy) e
theorem findP?_some [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.findP? cut = some y ↔ y ∈ toList t ∧ cut y = .eq :=
t.2.out.1.find?_some.trans <| by simp [mem_toList]
theorem find?_some [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.find? x = some y ↔ y ∈ toList t ∧ cmp x y = .eq := findP?_some
theorem memP_iff_findP? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
MemP cut t ↔ ∃ y, t.findP? cut = some y := t.2.out.1.memP_iff_find?
theorem mem_iff_find? [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
x ∈ t ↔ ∃ y, t.find? x = some y := memP_iff_findP?
@[simp] theorem contains_iff [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.contains x ↔ x ∈ t := Option.isSome_iff_exists.trans mem_iff_find?.symm
instance [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} : Decidable (x ∈ t) := decidable_of_iff _ contains_iff
theorem size_eq (t : RBSet α cmp) : t.size = t.toList.length := RBNode.size_eq
theorem mem_toList_insert_self (v) (t : RBSet α cmp) : v ∈ toList (t.insert v) :=
let ⟨_, _, h⟩ := t.2.out.2; mem_toList.2 (RBNode.mem_insert_self h)
theorem mem_insert_self [@OrientedCmp α cmp] (v) (t : RBSet α cmp) : v ∈ t.insert v :=
mem_of_mem_toList <| mem_toList_insert_self v t
theorem mem_insert_of_eq [@TransCmp α cmp] (t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cmp v v' = .eq) :
v' ∈ t.insert v := (mem_congr h).1 (mem_insert_self ..)
theorem mem_toList_insert_of_mem (v) {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : v' ∈ toList t) :
v' ∈ toList (t.insert v) ∨ cmp v v' = .eq :=
let ⟨_, _, ht⟩ := t.2.out.2
.imp_left mem_toList.2 <| RBNode.mem_insert_of_mem ht <| mem_toList.1 h
theorem mem_insert_of_mem_toList [@OrientedCmp α cmp] (v) {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : v' ∈ toList t) :
v' ∈ t.insert v :=
match mem_toList_insert_of_mem v h with
| .inl h' => mem_of_mem_toList h'
| .inr h' => mem_iff_mem_toList.2 ⟨_, mem_toList_insert_self .., OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_eq_symm.1 h'⟩
theorem mem_insert_of_mem [@TransCmp α cmp] (v) {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : v' ∈ t) : v' ∈ t.insert v :=
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_iff_mem_toList.1 h
(mem_congr h₂).2 (mem_insert_of_mem_toList v h₁)
theorem mem_toList_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
v' ∈ toList (t.insert v) ↔ (v' ∈ toList t ∧ t.find? v ≠ some v') ∨ v' = v := by
let ⟨ht₁, _, _, ht₂⟩ := t.2.out
simpa [mem_toList] using RBNode.mem_insert ht₂ ht₁
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/RBMap/Lemmas.lean | 940 | 946 | theorem mem_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
v' ∈ t.insert v ↔ v' ∈ t ∨ cmp v v' = .eq := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun | .inl h => mem_insert_of_mem _ h | .inr h => mem_insert_of_eq _ h⟩
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_iff_mem_toList.1 h
match mem_toList_insert.1 h₁ with
| .inl ⟨h₃, _⟩ => exact .inl <| mem_iff_mem_toList.2 ⟨_, h₃, h₂⟩
| .inr rfl => exact .inr <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_eq_symm.1 h₂
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Directed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.IntermediateField
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.SplittingField.IsSplittingField
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import field_theory.adjoin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"df76f43357840485b9d04ed5dee5ab115d420e87"
/-!
# Adjoining Elements to Fields
In this file we introduce the notion of adjoining elements to fields.
This isn't quite the same as adjoining elements to rings.
For example, `Algebra.adjoin K {x}` might not include `x⁻¹`.
## Main results
- `adjoin_adjoin_left`: adjoining S and then T is the same as adjoining `S ∪ T`.
- `bot_eq_top_of_rank_adjoin_eq_one`: if `F⟮x⟯` has dimension `1` over `F` for every `x`
in `E` then `F = E`
## Notation
- `F⟮α⟯`: adjoin a single element `α` to `F` (in scope `IntermediateField`).
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial
open scoped Classical Polynomial
namespace IntermediateField
section AdjoinDef
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] (S : Set E)
-- Porting note: not adding `neg_mem'` causes an error.
/-- `adjoin F S` extends a field `F` by adjoining a set `S ⊆ E`. -/
def adjoin : IntermediateField F E :=
{ Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S) with
algebraMap_mem' := fun x => Subfield.subset_closure (Or.inl (Set.mem_range_self x)) }
#align intermediate_field.adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin
variable {S}
theorem mem_adjoin_iff (x : E) :
x ∈ adjoin F S ↔ ∃ r s : MvPolynomial S F,
x = MvPolynomial.aeval Subtype.val r / MvPolynomial.aeval Subtype.val s := by
simp only [adjoin, mem_mk, Subring.mem_toSubsemiring, Subfield.mem_toSubring,
Subfield.mem_closure_iff, ← Algebra.adjoin_eq_ring_closure, Subalgebra.mem_toSubring,
Algebra.adjoin_eq_range, AlgHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
tauto
theorem mem_adjoin_simple_iff {α : E} (x : E) :
x ∈ adjoin F {α} ↔ ∃ r s : F[X], x = aeval α r / aeval α s := by
simp only [adjoin, mem_mk, Subring.mem_toSubsemiring, Subfield.mem_toSubring,
Subfield.mem_closure_iff, ← Algebra.adjoin_eq_ring_closure, Subalgebra.mem_toSubring,
Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval, AlgHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
tauto
end AdjoinDef
section Lattice
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_le_iff {S : Set E} {T : IntermediateField F E} : adjoin F S ≤ T ↔ S ≤ T :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (le_trans Set.subset_union_right Subfield.subset_closure) H, fun H =>
(@Subfield.closure_le E _ (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S) T.toSubfield).mpr
(Set.union_subset (IntermediateField.set_range_subset T) H)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_le_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_le_iff
theorem gc : GaloisConnection (adjoin F : Set E → IntermediateField F E)
(fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) := fun _ _ =>
adjoin_le_iff
#align intermediate_field.gc IntermediateField.gc
/-- Galois insertion between `adjoin` and `coe`. -/
def gi : GaloisInsertion (adjoin F : Set E → IntermediateField F E)
(fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) where
choice s hs := (adjoin F s).copy s <| le_antisymm (gc.le_u_l s) hs
gc := IntermediateField.gc
le_l_u S := (IntermediateField.gc (S : Set E) (adjoin F S)).1 <| le_rfl
choice_eq _ _ := copy_eq _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.gi IntermediateField.gi
instance : CompleteLattice (IntermediateField F E) where
__ := GaloisInsertion.liftCompleteLattice IntermediateField.gi
bot :=
{ toSubalgebra := ⊥
inv_mem' := by rintro x ⟨r, rfl⟩; exact ⟨r⁻¹, map_inv₀ _ _⟩ }
bot_le x := (bot_le : ⊥ ≤ x.toSubalgebra)
instance : Inhabited (IntermediateField F E) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : Unique (IntermediateField F F) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (IntermediateField F F)) with
uniq := fun _ ↦ toSubalgebra_injective <| Subsingleton.elim _ _ }
theorem coe_bot : ↑(⊥ : IntermediateField F E) = Set.range (algebraMap F E) := rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_bot IntermediateField.coe_bot
theorem mem_bot {x : E} : x ∈ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) ↔ x ∈ Set.range (algebraMap F E) :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_bot IntermediateField.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_toSubalgebra : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E).toSubalgebra = ⊥ := rfl
#align intermediate_field.bot_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.bot_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_top : ↑(⊤ : IntermediateField F E) = (Set.univ : Set E) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_top IntermediateField.coe_top
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : E} : x ∈ (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) :=
trivial
#align intermediate_field.mem_top IntermediateField.mem_top
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubalgebra : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).toSubalgebra = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.top_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.top_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem top_toSubfield : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).toSubfield = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.top_to_subfield IntermediateField.top_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (S T : IntermediateField F E) : (↑(S ⊓ T) : Set E) = (S : Set E) ∩ T :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_inf IntermediateField.coe_inf
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {S T : IntermediateField F E} {x : E} : x ∈ S ⊓ T ↔ x ∈ S ∧ x ∈ T :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_inf IntermediateField.mem_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubalgebra (S T : IntermediateField F E) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubalgebra = S.toSubalgebra ⊓ T.toSubalgebra :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.inf_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.inf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem inf_toSubfield (S T : IntermediateField F E) :
(S ⊓ T).toSubfield = S.toSubfield ⊓ T.toSubfield :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.inf_to_subfield IntermediateField.inf_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set E) =
sInf ((fun (x : IntermediateField F E) => (x : Set E)) '' S) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_Inf IntermediateField.coe_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubalgebra (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) :
(sInf S).toSubalgebra = sInf (toSubalgebra '' S) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [Set.sUnion_image]
#align intermediate_field.Inf_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.sInf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem sInf_toSubfield (S : Set (IntermediateField F E)) :
(sInf S).toSubfield = sInf (toSubfield '' S) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [Set.sUnion_image]
#align intermediate_field.Inf_to_subfield IntermediateField.sInf_toSubfield
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) : (↑(iInf S) : Set E) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.coe_infi IntermediateField.coe_iInf
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubalgebra {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iInf S).toSubalgebra = ⨅ i, (S i).toSubalgebra :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.infi_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.iInf_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem iInf_toSubfield {ι : Sort*} (S : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iInf S).toSubfield = ⨅ i, (S i).toSubfield :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| by simp [iInf]
#align intermediate_field.infi_to_subfield IntermediateField.iInf_toSubfield
/-- Construct an algebra isomorphism from an equality of intermediate fields -/
@[simps! apply]
def equivOfEq {S T : IntermediateField F E} (h : S = T) : S ≃ₐ[F] T :=
Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ (congr_arg toSubalgebra h)
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq IntermediateField.equivOfEq
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_symm {S T : IntermediateField F E} (h : S = T) :
(equivOfEq h).symm = equivOfEq h.symm :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_symm IntermediateField.equivOfEq_symm
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_rfl (S : IntermediateField F E) : equivOfEq (rfl : S = S) = AlgEquiv.refl := by
ext; rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_rfl IntermediateField.equivOfEq_rfl
@[simp]
theorem equivOfEq_trans {S T U : IntermediateField F E} (hST : S = T) (hTU : T = U) :
(equivOfEq hST).trans (equivOfEq hTU) = equivOfEq (hST.trans hTU) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.equiv_of_eq_trans IntermediateField.equivOfEq_trans
variable (F E)
/-- The bottom intermediate_field is isomorphic to the field. -/
noncomputable def botEquiv : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) ≃ₐ[F] F :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ bot_toSubalgebra).trans (Algebra.botEquiv F E)
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv IntermediateField.botEquiv
variable {F E}
-- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`.
theorem botEquiv_def (x : F) : botEquiv F E (algebraMap F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) x) = x := by
simp
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv_def IntermediateField.botEquiv_def
@[simp]
theorem botEquiv_symm (x : F) : (botEquiv F E).symm x = algebraMap F _ x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.bot_equiv_symm IntermediateField.botEquiv_symm
noncomputable instance algebraOverBot : Algebra (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F :=
(IntermediateField.botEquiv F E).toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
#align intermediate_field.algebra_over_bot IntermediateField.algebraOverBot
theorem coe_algebraMap_over_bot :
(algebraMap (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F : (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) → F) =
IntermediateField.botEquiv F E :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_algebra_map_over_bot IntermediateField.coe_algebraMap_over_bot
instance isScalarTower_over_bot : IsScalarTower (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) F E :=
IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq
(by
intro x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (botEquiv F E).symm.surjective x
rw [coe_algebraMap_over_bot, (botEquiv F E).apply_symm_apply, botEquiv_symm,
IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply F (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) E])
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_over_bot IntermediateField.isScalarTower_over_bot
/-- The top `IntermediateField` is isomorphic to the field.
This is the intermediate field version of `Subalgebra.topEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E) ≃ₐ[F] E :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ top_toSubalgebra).trans Subalgebra.topEquiv
#align intermediate_field.top_equiv IntermediateField.topEquiv
-- Porting note: this theorem is now generated by the `@[simps!]` above.
#align intermediate_field.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe IntermediateField.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_bot_eq_self (K : IntermediateField F E) :
(⊥ : IntermediateField K E).restrictScalars _ = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective Subtype.range_coe
#align intermediate_field.restrict_scalars_bot_eq_self IntermediateField.restrictScalars_bot_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_top {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra K E] [Algebra K F]
[IsScalarTower K F E] : (⊤ : IntermediateField F E).restrictScalars K = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.restrict_scalars_top IntermediateField.restrictScalars_top
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K]
@[simp]
theorem map_bot (f : E →ₐ[F] K) :
IntermediateField.map f ⊥ = ⊥ :=
toSubalgebra_injective <| Algebra.map_bot _
theorem map_sup (s t : IntermediateField F E) (f : E →ₐ[F] K) : (s ⊔ t).map f = s.map f ⊔ t.map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_sup
theorem map_iSup {ι : Sort*} (f : E →ₐ[F] K) (s : ι → IntermediateField F E) :
(iSup s).map f = ⨆ i, (s i).map f :=
(gc_map_comap f).l_iSup
theorem _root_.AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map (f : E →ₐ[F] K) :
f.fieldRange = IntermediateField.map f ⊤ :=
SetLike.ext' Set.image_univ.symm
#align alg_hom.field_range_eq_map AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map
theorem _root_.AlgHom.map_fieldRange {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra F L]
(f : E →ₐ[F] K) (g : K →ₐ[F] L) : f.fieldRange.map g = (g.comp f).fieldRange :=
SetLike.ext' (Set.range_comp g f).symm
#align alg_hom.map_field_range AlgHom.map_fieldRange
theorem _root_.AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top {f : E →ₐ[F] K} :
f.fieldRange = ⊤ ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
SetLike.ext'_iff.trans Set.range_iff_surjective
#align alg_hom.field_range_eq_top AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AlgEquiv.fieldRange_eq_top (f : E ≃ₐ[F] K) :
(f : E →ₐ[F] K).fieldRange = ⊤ :=
AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_top.mpr f.surjective
#align alg_equiv.field_range_eq_top AlgEquiv.fieldRange_eq_top
end Lattice
section equivMap
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E]
{K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K] (L : IntermediateField F E) (f : E →ₐ[F] K)
theorem fieldRange_comp_val : (f.comp L.val).fieldRange = L.map f := toSubalgebra_injective <| by
rw [toSubalgebra_map, AlgHom.fieldRange_toSubalgebra, AlgHom.range_comp, range_val]
/-- An intermediate field is isomorphic to its image under an `AlgHom`
(which is automatically injective) -/
noncomputable def equivMap : L ≃ₐ[F] L.map f :=
(AlgEquiv.ofInjective _ (f.comp L.val).injective).trans (equivOfEq (fieldRange_comp_val L f))
@[simp]
theorem coe_equivMap_apply (x : L) : ↑(equivMap L f x) = f x := rfl
end equivMap
section AdjoinDef
variable (F : Type*) [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] (S : Set E)
theorem adjoin_eq_range_algebraMap_adjoin :
(adjoin F S : Set E) = Set.range (algebraMap (adjoin F S) E) :=
Subtype.range_coe.symm
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_range_algebra_map_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_range_algebraMap_adjoin
theorem adjoin.algebraMap_mem (x : F) : algebraMap F E x ∈ adjoin F S :=
IntermediateField.algebraMap_mem (adjoin F S) x
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.algebra_map_mem IntermediateField.adjoin.algebraMap_mem
theorem adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset : Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ adjoin F S := by
intro x hx
cases' hx with f hf
rw [← hf]
exact adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S f
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.range_algebra_map_subset IntermediateField.adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset
instance adjoin.fieldCoe : CoeTC F (adjoin F S) where
coe x := ⟨algebraMap F E x, adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S x⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.field_coe IntermediateField.adjoin.fieldCoe
theorem subset_adjoin : S ⊆ adjoin F S := fun _ hx => Subfield.subset_closure (Or.inr hx)
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin IntermediateField.subset_adjoin
instance adjoin.setCoe : CoeTC S (adjoin F S) where coe x := ⟨x, subset_adjoin F S (Subtype.mem x)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.set_coe IntermediateField.adjoin.setCoe
@[mono]
theorem adjoin.mono (T : Set E) (h : S ⊆ T) : adjoin F S ≤ adjoin F T :=
GaloisConnection.monotone_l gc h
#align intermediate_field.adjoin.mono IntermediateField.adjoin.mono
theorem adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield (F : Subfield E) : (F : Set E) ⊆ adjoin F S := fun x hx =>
adjoin.algebraMap_mem F S ⟨x, hx⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield IntermediateField.adjoin_contains_field_as_subfield
theorem subset_adjoin_of_subset_left {F : Subfield E} {T : Set E} (HT : T ⊆ F) : T ⊆ adjoin F S :=
fun x hx => (adjoin F S).algebraMap_mem ⟨x, HT hx⟩
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin_of_subset_left IntermediateField.subset_adjoin_of_subset_left
theorem subset_adjoin_of_subset_right {T : Set E} (H : T ⊆ S) : T ⊆ adjoin F S := fun _ hx =>
subset_adjoin F S (H hx)
#align intermediate_field.subset_adjoin_of_subset_right IntermediateField.subset_adjoin_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_empty (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] : adjoin F (∅ : Set E) = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr (adjoin_le_iff.mpr (Set.empty_subset _))
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_empty IntermediateField.adjoin_empty
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_univ (F E : Type*) [Field F] [Field E] [Algebra F E] :
adjoin F (Set.univ : Set E) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr <| subset_adjoin _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_univ IntermediateField.adjoin_univ
/-- If `K` is a field with `F ⊆ K` and `S ⊆ K` then `adjoin F S ≤ K`. -/
theorem adjoin_le_subfield {K : Subfield E} (HF : Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ K) (HS : S ⊆ K) :
(adjoin F S).toSubfield ≤ K := by
apply Subfield.closure_le.mpr
rw [Set.union_subset_iff]
exact ⟨HF, HS⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_le_subfield IntermediateField.adjoin_le_subfield
theorem adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff {F' : Type*} [Field F'] [Algebra F' E] {S S' : Set E} :
(adjoin F S : Set E) ⊆ adjoin F' S' ↔
Set.range (algebraMap F E) ⊆ adjoin F' S' ∧ S ⊆ adjoin F' S' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(adjoin.range_algebraMap_subset _ _).trans h,
(subset_adjoin _ _).trans h⟩, fun ⟨hF, hS⟩ =>
(Subfield.closure_le (t := (adjoin F' S').toSubfield)).mpr (Set.union_subset hF hS)⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff
/-- `F[S][T] = F[S ∪ T]` -/
theorem adjoin_adjoin_left (T : Set E) :
(adjoin (adjoin F S) T).restrictScalars _ = adjoin F (S ∪ T) := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff]
change (↑(adjoin (adjoin F S) T) : Set E) = _
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset <;> rw [adjoin_subset_adjoin_iff] <;> constructor
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩; exact adjoin.mono _ _ _ Set.subset_union_left hx
· exact subset_adjoin_of_subset_right _ _ Set.subset_union_right
-- Porting note: orginal proof times out
· rintro x ⟨f, rfl⟩
refine Subfield.subset_closure ?_
left
exact ⟨f, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: orginal proof times out
· refine Set.union_subset (fun x hx => Subfield.subset_closure ?_)
(fun x hx => Subfield.subset_closure ?_)
· left
refine ⟨⟨x, Subfield.subset_closure ?_⟩, rfl⟩
right
exact hx
· right
exact hx
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_adjoin_left IntermediateField.adjoin_adjoin_left
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_insert_adjoin (x : E) :
adjoin F (insert x (adjoin F S : Set E)) = adjoin F (insert x S) :=
le_antisymm
(adjoin_le_iff.mpr
(Set.insert_subset_iff.mpr
⟨subset_adjoin _ _ (Set.mem_insert _ _),
adjoin_le_iff.mpr (subset_adjoin_of_subset_right _ _ (Set.subset_insert _ _))⟩))
(adjoin.mono _ _ _ (Set.insert_subset_insert (subset_adjoin _ _)))
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_insert_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_insert_adjoin
/-- `F[S][T] = F[T][S]` -/
theorem adjoin_adjoin_comm (T : Set E) :
(adjoin (adjoin F S) T).restrictScalars F = (adjoin (adjoin F T) S).restrictScalars F := by
rw [adjoin_adjoin_left, adjoin_adjoin_left, Set.union_comm]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_adjoin_comm IntermediateField.adjoin_adjoin_comm
theorem adjoin_map {E' : Type*} [Field E'] [Algebra F E'] (f : E →ₐ[F] E') :
(adjoin F S).map f = adjoin F (f '' S) := by
ext x
show
x ∈ (Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E) ∪ S)).map (f : E →+* E') ↔
x ∈ Subfield.closure (Set.range (algebraMap F E') ∪ f '' S)
rw [RingHom.map_field_closure, Set.image_union, ← Set.range_comp, ← RingHom.coe_comp,
f.comp_algebraMap]
rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_map IntermediateField.adjoin_map
@[simp]
theorem lift_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E) (S : Set K) :
lift (adjoin F S) = adjoin F (Subtype.val '' S) :=
adjoin_map _ _ _
theorem lift_adjoin_simple (K : IntermediateField F E) (α : K) :
lift (adjoin F {α}) = adjoin F {α.1} := by
simp only [lift_adjoin, Set.image_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lift_bot (K : IntermediateField F E) :
lift (F := K) ⊥ = ⊥ := map_bot _
@[simp]
theorem lift_top (K : IntermediateField F E) :
lift (F := K) ⊤ = K := by rw [lift, ← AlgHom.fieldRange_eq_map, fieldRange_val]
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_self (K : IntermediateField F E) :
adjoin F K = K := le_antisymm (adjoin_le_iff.2 fun _ ↦ id) (subset_adjoin F _)
theorem restrictScalars_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E) (S : Set E) :
restrictScalars F (adjoin K S) = adjoin F (K ∪ S) := by
rw [← adjoin_self _ K, adjoin_adjoin_left, adjoin_self _ K]
variable {F} in
theorem extendScalars_adjoin {K : IntermediateField F E} {S : Set E} (h : K ≤ adjoin F S) :
extendScalars h = adjoin K S := restrictScalars_injective F <| by
rw [extendScalars_restrictScalars, restrictScalars_adjoin]
exact le_antisymm (adjoin.mono F S _ Set.subset_union_right) <| adjoin_le_iff.2 <|
Set.union_subset h (subset_adjoin F S)
variable {F} in
/-- If `E / L / F` and `E / L' / F` are two field extension towers, `L ≃ₐ[F] L'` is an isomorphism
compatible with `E / L` and `E / L'`, then for any subset `S` of `E`, `L(S)` and `L'(S)` are
equal as intermediate fields of `E / F`. -/
theorem restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv
{L L' : Type*} [Field L] [Field L']
[Algebra F L] [Algebra L E] [Algebra F L'] [Algebra L' E]
[IsScalarTower F L E] [IsScalarTower F L' E] (i : L ≃ₐ[F] L')
(hi : algebraMap L E = (algebraMap L' E) ∘ i) (S : Set E) :
(adjoin L S).restrictScalars F = (adjoin L' S).restrictScalars F := by
apply_fun toSubfield using (fun K K' h ↦ by
ext x; change x ∈ K.toSubfield ↔ x ∈ K'.toSubfield; rw [h])
change Subfield.closure _ = Subfield.closure _
congr
ext x
exact ⟨fun ⟨y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i y, by rw [← h, hi]; rfl⟩,
fun ⟨y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨i.symm y, by rw [← h, hi, Function.comp_apply, AlgEquiv.apply_symm_apply]⟩⟩
theorem algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin : Algebra.adjoin F S ≤ (adjoin F S).toSubalgebra :=
Algebra.adjoin_le (subset_adjoin _ _)
#align intermediate_field.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin IntermediateField.algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin
theorem adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ Algebra.adjoin F S, x⁻¹ ∈ Algebra.adjoin F S) :
(adjoin F S).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S :=
le_antisymm
(show adjoin F S ≤
{ Algebra.adjoin F S with
inv_mem' := inv_mem }
from adjoin_le_iff.mpr Algebra.subset_adjoin)
(algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin _ _)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin
theorem eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin (K : IntermediateField F E)
(h : K.toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S) : K = adjoin F S := by
apply toSubalgebra_injective
rw [h]
refine (adjoin_eq_algebra_adjoin F _ ?_).symm
intro x
convert K.inv_mem (x := x) <;> rw [← h] <;> rfl
#align intermediate_field.eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin IntermediateField.eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin
theorem adjoin_eq_top_of_algebra (hS : Algebra.adjoin F S = ⊤) : adjoin F S = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.mp (hS.symm.trans_le <| algebra_adjoin_le_adjoin F S)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem adjoin_induction {s : Set E} {p : E → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ adjoin F s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(algebraMap : ∀ x, p (algebraMap F E x)) (add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y))
(neg : ∀ x, p x → p (-x)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) (mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) :
p x :=
Subfield.closure_induction h
(fun x hx => Or.casesOn hx (fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => hx ▸ algebraMap x) (mem x))
((_root_.algebraMap F E).map_one ▸ algebraMap 1) add neg inv mul
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_induction IntermediateField.adjoin_induction
/- Porting note (kmill): this notation is replacing the typeclass-based one I had previously
written, and it gives true `{x₁, x₂, ..., xₙ}` sets in the `adjoin` term. -/
open Lean in
/-- Supporting function for the `F⟮x₁,x₂,...,xₙ⟯` adjunction notation. -/
private partial def mkInsertTerm [Monad m] [MonadQuotation m] (xs : TSyntaxArray `term) : m Term :=
run 0
where
run (i : Nat) : m Term := do
if i + 1 == xs.size then
``(singleton $(xs[i]!))
else if i < xs.size then
``(insert $(xs[i]!) $(← run (i + 1)))
else
``(EmptyCollection.emptyCollection)
/-- If `x₁ x₂ ... xₙ : E` then `F⟮x₁,x₂,...,xₙ⟯` is the `IntermediateField F E`
generated by these elements. -/
scoped macro:max K:term "⟮" xs:term,* "⟯" : term => do ``(adjoin $K $(← mkInsertTerm xs.getElems))
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
@[delab app.IntermediateField.adjoin]
partial def delabAdjoinNotation : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``adjoin 6
let F ← withNaryArg 0 delab
let xs ← withNaryArg 5 delabInsertArray
`($F⟮$(xs.toArray),*⟯)
where
delabInsertArray : DelabM (List Term) := do
let e ← getExpr
if e.isAppOfArity ``EmptyCollection.emptyCollection 2 then
return []
else if e.isAppOfArity ``singleton 4 then
let x ← withNaryArg 3 delab
return [x]
else if e.isAppOfArity ``insert 5 then
let x ← withNaryArg 3 delab
let xs ← withNaryArg 4 delabInsertArray
return x :: xs
else failure
section AdjoinSimple
variable (α : E)
-- Porting note: in all the theorems below, mathport translated `F⟮α⟯` into `F⟮⟯`.
theorem mem_adjoin_simple_self : α ∈ F⟮α⟯ :=
subset_adjoin F {α} (Set.mem_singleton α)
#align intermediate_field.mem_adjoin_simple_self IntermediateField.mem_adjoin_simple_self
/-- generator of `F⟮α⟯` -/
def AdjoinSimple.gen : F⟮α⟯ :=
⟨α, mem_adjoin_simple_self F α⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.gen
@[simp]
theorem AdjoinSimple.coe_gen : (AdjoinSimple.gen F α : E) = α :=
rfl
theorem AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen : algebraMap F⟮α⟯ E (AdjoinSimple.gen F α) = α :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.algebra_map_gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen
@[simp]
theorem AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen : IsIntegral F (AdjoinSimple.gen F α) ↔ IsIntegral F α := by
conv_rhs => rw [← AdjoinSimple.algebraMap_gen F α]
rw [isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap F⟮α⟯ E).injective]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple.is_integral_gen IntermediateField.AdjoinSimple.isIntegral_gen
theorem adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple (β : E) : F⟮α⟯⟮β⟯.restrictScalars F = F⟮α, β⟯ :=
adjoin_adjoin_left _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_adjoin_simple
theorem adjoin_simple_comm (β : E) : F⟮α⟯⟮β⟯.restrictScalars F = F⟮β⟯⟮α⟯.restrictScalars F :=
adjoin_adjoin_comm _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_comm IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_comm
variable {F} {α}
theorem adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra {S : Set E} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, IsAlgebraic F x) :
(IntermediateField.adjoin F S).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F S := by
simp only [isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral] at hS
have : Algebra.IsIntegral F (Algebra.adjoin F S) := by
rwa [← le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff]
have : IsField (Algebra.adjoin F S) := isField_of_isIntegral_of_isField' (Field.toIsField F)
rw [← ((Algebra.adjoin F S).toIntermediateField' this).eq_adjoin_of_eq_algebra_adjoin F S] <;> rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_algebraic_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra
theorem adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral (hα : IsIntegral F α) :
F⟮α⟯.toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin F {α} := by
apply adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra
rintro x (rfl : x = α)
rwa [isAlgebraic_iff_isIntegral]
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_to_subalgebra_of_integral IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_toSubalgebra_of_integral
/-- Characterize `IsSplittingField` with `IntermediateField.adjoin` instead of `Algebra.adjoin`. -/
theorem _root_.isSplittingField_iff_intermediateField {p : F[X]} :
p.IsSplittingField F E ↔ p.Splits (algebraMap F E) ∧ adjoin F (p.rootSet E) = ⊤ := by
rw [← toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun _ ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
exact ⟨fun ⟨spl, adj⟩ ↦ ⟨spl, adj⟩, fun ⟨spl, adj⟩ ↦ ⟨spl, adj⟩⟩
-- Note: p.Splits (algebraMap F E) also works
theorem isSplittingField_iff {p : F[X]} {K : IntermediateField F E} :
p.IsSplittingField F K ↔ p.Splits (algebraMap F K) ∧ K = adjoin F (p.rootSet E) := by
suffices _ → (Algebra.adjoin F (p.rootSet K) = ⊤ ↔ K = adjoin F (p.rootSet E)) by
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, (this h.1).mp h.2⟩, fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, (this h.1).mpr h.2⟩⟩
rw [← toSubalgebra_injective.eq_iff,
adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun x ↦ isAlgebraic_of_mem_rootSet]
refine fun hp ↦ (adjoin_rootSet_eq_range hp K.val).symm.trans ?_
rw [← K.range_val, eq_comm]
#align intermediate_field.is_splitting_field_iff IntermediateField.isSplittingField_iff
theorem adjoin_rootSet_isSplittingField {p : F[X]} (hp : p.Splits (algebraMap F E)) :
p.IsSplittingField F (adjoin F (p.rootSet E)) :=
isSplittingField_iff.mpr ⟨splits_of_splits hp fun _ hx ↦ subset_adjoin F (p.rootSet E) hx, rfl⟩
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_root_set_is_splitting_field IntermediateField.adjoin_rootSet_isSplittingField
section Supremum
variable {K L : Type*} [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L] (E1 E2 : IntermediateField K L)
theorem le_sup_toSubalgebra : E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra ≤ (E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra :=
sup_le (show E1 ≤ E1 ⊔ E2 from le_sup_left) (show E2 ≤ E1 ⊔ E2 from le_sup_right)
#align intermediate_field.le_sup_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.le_sup_toSubalgebra
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E2] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra := by
have : (adjoin E1 (E2 : Set L)).toSubalgebra = _ := adjoin_algebraic_toSubalgebra fun x h ↦
IsAlgebraic.tower_top E1 (isAlgebraic_iff.1
(Algebra.IsAlgebraic.isAlgebraic (⟨x, h⟩ : E2)))
apply_fun Subalgebra.restrictScalars K at this
erw [← restrictScalars_toSubalgebra, restrictScalars_adjoin,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin] at this
exact this
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left [Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E1] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra := by
have := sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right E2 E1
rwa [sup_comm (a := E1), sup_comm (a := E1.toSubalgebra)]
/-- The compositum of two intermediate fields is equal to the compositum of them
as subalgebras, if one of them is algebraic over the base field. -/
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic
(halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E1 ∨ Algebra.IsAlgebraic K E2) :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra :=
halg.elim (fun _ ↦ sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left E1 E2)
(fun _ ↦ sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right E1 E2)
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_left [FiniteDimensional K E1] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra :=
sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left E1 E2
#align intermediate_field.sup_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.sup_toSubalgebra_of_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-19")] alias sup_toSubalgebra := sup_toSubalgebra_of_left
theorem sup_toSubalgebra_of_right [FiniteDimensional K E2] :
(E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra = E1.toSubalgebra ⊔ E2.toSubalgebra :=
sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right E1 E2
instance finiteDimensional_sup [FiniteDimensional K E1] [FiniteDimensional K E2] :
FiniteDimensional K (E1 ⊔ E2 : IntermediateField K L) := by
let g := Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap E1.val E2.val
suffices g.range = (E1 ⊔ E2).toSubalgebra by
have h : FiniteDimensional K (Subalgebra.toSubmodule g.range) :=
g.toLinearMap.finiteDimensional_range
rwa [this] at h
rw [Algebra.TensorProduct.productMap_range, E1.range_val, E2.range_val, sup_toSubalgebra_of_left]
#align intermediate_field.finite_dimensional_sup IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_sup
variable {ι : Type*} {t : ι → IntermediateField K L}
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed [Nonempty ι] (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) t) :
↑(iSup t) = ⋃ i, (t i : Set L) :=
let M : IntermediateField K L :=
{ __ := Subalgebra.copy _ _ (Subalgebra.coe_iSup_of_directed dir).symm
inv_mem' := fun _ hx ↦ have ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp hx
Set.mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨i, (t i).inv_mem hi⟩ }
have : iSup t = M := le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i ↦ le_iSup (fun i ↦ (t i : Set L)) i) (Set.iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ le_iSup t _)
this.symm ▸ rfl
theorem toSubalgebra_iSup_of_directed (dir : Directed (· ≤ ·) t) :
(iSup t).toSubalgebra = ⨆ i, (t i).toSubalgebra := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp_rw [iSup_of_empty, bot_toSubalgebra]
· exact SetLike.ext' ((coe_iSup_of_directed dir).trans (Subalgebra.coe_iSup_of_directed dir).symm)
instance finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite [h : Finite ι] [∀ i, FiniteDimensional K (t i)] :
FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i, t i : IntermediateField K L) := by
rw [← iSup_univ]
let P : Set ι → Prop := fun s => FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L)
change P Set.univ
apply Set.Finite.induction_on
all_goals dsimp only [P]
· exact Set.finite_univ
· rw [iSup_emptyset]
exact (botEquiv K L).symm.toLinearEquiv.finiteDimensional
· intro _ s _ _ hs
rw [iSup_insert]
exact IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_sup _ _
#align intermediate_field.finite_dimensional_supr_of_finite IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite
instance finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset
/- Porting note: changed `h` from `∀ i ∈ s, FiniteDimensional K (t i)` because this caused an
error. See `finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset'` for a stronger version, that was the one
used in mathlib3. -/
{s : Finset ι} [∀ i, FiniteDimensional K (t i)] :
FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L) :=
iSup_subtype'' s t ▸ IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite
#align intermediate_field.finite_dimensional_supr_of_finset IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset
theorem finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finset'
/- Porting note: this was the mathlib3 version. Using `[h : ...]`, as in mathlib3, causes the
error "invalid parametric local instance". -/
{s : Finset ι} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, FiniteDimensional K (t i)) :
FiniteDimensional K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L) :=
have := Subtype.forall'.mp h
iSup_subtype'' s t ▸ IntermediateField.finiteDimensional_iSup_of_finite
/-- A compositum of splitting fields is a splitting field -/
theorem isSplittingField_iSup {p : ι → K[X]}
{s : Finset ι} (h0 : ∏ i ∈ s, p i ≠ 0) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (p i).IsSplittingField K (t i)) :
(∏ i ∈ s, p i).IsSplittingField K (⨆ i ∈ s, t i : IntermediateField K L) := by
let F : IntermediateField K L := ⨆ i ∈ s, t i
have hF : ∀ i ∈ s, t i ≤ F := fun i hi ↦ le_iSup_of_le i (le_iSup (fun _ ↦ t i) hi)
simp only [isSplittingField_iff] at h ⊢
refine
⟨splits_prod (algebraMap K F) fun i hi ↦
splits_comp_of_splits (algebraMap K (t i)) (inclusion (hF i hi)).toRingHom
(h i hi).1,
?_⟩
simp only [rootSet_prod p s h0, ← Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, (@gc K _ L _ _).l_iSup₂]
exact iSup_congr fun i ↦ iSup_congr fun hi ↦ (h i hi).2
#align intermediate_field.is_splitting_field_supr IntermediateField.isSplittingField_iSup
end Supremum
section Tower
variable (E)
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra F K] [Algebra E K] [IsScalarTower F E K]
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, `L` is an intermediate field of `K / F`, such that
either `E / F` or `L / F` is algebraic, then `E(L) = E[L]`. -/
theorem adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic (L : IntermediateField F K)
(halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E ∨ Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L) :
(adjoin E (L : Set K)).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin E (L : Set K) := by
let i := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom F E K
let E' := i.fieldRange
let i' : E ≃ₐ[F] E' := AlgEquiv.ofInjectiveField i
have hi : algebraMap E K = (algebraMap E' K) ∘ i' := by ext x; rfl
apply_fun _ using Subalgebra.restrictScalars_injective F
erw [← restrictScalars_toSubalgebra, restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv i' hi,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin_of_algEquiv i' hi, restrictScalars_adjoin,
Algebra.restrictScalars_adjoin]
exact E'.sup_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic L (halg.imp
(fun (_ : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E) ↦ i'.isAlgebraic) id)
theorem adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_left (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] :
(adjoin E (L : Set K)).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin E (L : Set K) :=
adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inl halg)
theorem adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic_right (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L] :
(adjoin E (L : Set K)).toSubalgebra = Algebra.adjoin E (L : Set K) :=
adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inr halg)
/-- If `K / E / F` is a field extension tower, `L` is an intermediate field of `K / F`, such that
either `E / F` or `L / F` is algebraic, then `[E(L) : E] ≤ [L : F]`. A corollary of
`Subalgebra.adjoin_rank_le` since in this case `E(L) = E[L]`. -/
theorem adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic (L : IntermediateField F K)
(halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E ∨ Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L) :
Module.rank E (adjoin E (L : Set K)) ≤ Module.rank F L := by
have h : (adjoin E (L.toSubalgebra : Set K)).toSubalgebra =
Algebra.adjoin E (L.toSubalgebra : Set K) :=
L.adjoin_toSubalgebra_of_isAlgebraic E halg
have := L.toSubalgebra.adjoin_rank_le E
rwa [(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ h).symm.toLinearEquiv.rank_eq] at this
theorem adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic_left (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F E] :
Module.rank E (adjoin E (L : Set K)) ≤ Module.rank F L :=
adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inl halg)
theorem adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic_right (L : IntermediateField F K)
[halg : Algebra.IsAlgebraic F L] :
Module.rank E (adjoin E (L : Set K)) ≤ Module.rank F L :=
adjoin_rank_le_of_isAlgebraic E L (Or.inr halg)
end Tower
open Set CompleteLattice
/- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`, but the LHS can be simplified now that the notation
has been improved. -/
theorem adjoin_simple_le_iff {K : IntermediateField F E} : F⟮α⟯ ≤ K ↔ α ∈ K := by simp
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_le_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_le_iff
theorem biSup_adjoin_simple : ⨆ x ∈ S, F⟮x⟯ = adjoin F S := by
rw [← iSup_subtype'', ← gc.l_iSup, iSup_subtype'']; congr; exact S.biUnion_of_singleton
/-- Adjoining a single element is compact in the lattice of intermediate fields. -/
theorem adjoin_simple_isCompactElement (x : E) : IsCompactElement F⟮x⟯ := by
simp_rw [isCompactElement_iff_le_of_directed_sSup_le,
adjoin_simple_le_iff, sSup_eq_iSup', ← exists_prop]
intro s hne hs hx
have := hne.to_subtype
rwa [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup_of_directed hs.directed_val, mem_iUnion, Subtype.exists] at hx
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_is_compact_element IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_isCompactElement
-- Porting note: original proof times out.
/-- Adjoining a finite subset is compact in the lattice of intermediate fields. -/
theorem adjoin_finset_isCompactElement (S : Finset E) :
IsCompactElement (adjoin F S : IntermediateField F E) := by
rw [← biSup_adjoin_simple]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_coe, ← Finset.sup_eq_iSup]
exact isCompactElement_finsetSup S fun x _ => adjoin_simple_isCompactElement x
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_finset_is_compact_element IntermediateField.adjoin_finset_isCompactElement
/-- Adjoining a finite subset is compact in the lattice of intermediate fields. -/
theorem adjoin_finite_isCompactElement {S : Set E} (h : S.Finite) : IsCompactElement (adjoin F S) :=
Finite.coe_toFinset h ▸ adjoin_finset_isCompactElement h.toFinset
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_finite_is_compact_element IntermediateField.adjoin_finite_isCompactElement
/-- The lattice of intermediate fields is compactly generated. -/
instance : IsCompactlyGenerated (IntermediateField F E) :=
⟨fun s =>
⟨(fun x => F⟮x⟯) '' s,
⟨by rintro t ⟨x, _, rfl⟩; exact adjoin_simple_isCompactElement x,
sSup_image.trans <| (biSup_adjoin_simple _).trans <|
le_antisymm (adjoin_le_iff.mpr le_rfl) <| subset_adjoin F (s : Set E)⟩⟩⟩
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_iSup {ι : Type*} {f : ι → IntermediateField F E} {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, f i) : ∃ s : Finset ι, x ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, f i := by
have := (adjoin_simple_isCompactElement x).exists_finset_of_le_iSup (IntermediateField F E) f
simp only [adjoin_simple_le_iff] at this
exact this hx
#align intermediate_field.exists_finset_of_mem_supr IntermediateField.exists_finset_of_mem_iSup
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_supr' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → IntermediateField F E} {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, f i) : ∃ s : Finset (Σ i, f i), x ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, F⟮(i.2 : E)⟯ := by
-- Porting note: writing `fun i x h => ...` does not work.
refine exists_finset_of_mem_iSup (SetLike.le_def.mp (iSup_le fun i ↦ ?_) hx)
exact fun x h ↦ SetLike.le_def.mp (le_iSup_of_le ⟨i, x, h⟩ (by simp)) (mem_adjoin_simple_self F x)
#align intermediate_field.exists_finset_of_mem_supr' IntermediateField.exists_finset_of_mem_supr'
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_supr'' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → IntermediateField F E}
(h : ∀ i, Algebra.IsAlgebraic F (f i)) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ⨆ i, f i) :
∃ s : Finset (Σ i, f i), x ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, adjoin F ((minpoly F (i.2 : _)).rootSet E) := by
-- Porting note: writing `fun i x1 hx1 => ...` does not work.
refine exists_finset_of_mem_iSup (SetLike.le_def.mp (iSup_le (fun i => ?_)) hx)
intro x1 hx1
refine SetLike.le_def.mp (le_iSup_of_le ⟨i, x1, hx1⟩ ?_)
(subset_adjoin F (rootSet (minpoly F x1) E) ?_)
· rw [IntermediateField.minpoly_eq, Subtype.coe_mk]
· rw [mem_rootSet_of_ne, minpoly.aeval]
exact minpoly.ne_zero (isIntegral_iff.mp (Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral (⟨x1, hx1⟩ : f i)))
#align intermediate_field.exists_finset_of_mem_supr'' IntermediateField.exists_finset_of_mem_supr''
theorem exists_finset_of_mem_adjoin {S : Set E} {x : E} (hx : x ∈ adjoin F S) :
∃ T : Finset E, (T : Set E) ⊆ S ∧ x ∈ adjoin F (T : Set E) := by
simp_rw [← biSup_adjoin_simple S, ← iSup_subtype''] at hx
obtain ⟨s, hx'⟩ := exists_finset_of_mem_iSup hx
refine ⟨s.image Subtype.val, by simp, SetLike.le_def.mp ?_ hx'⟩
simp_rw [Finset.coe_image, iSup_le_iff, adjoin_le_iff]
rintro _ h _ rfl
exact subset_adjoin F _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
end AdjoinSimple
end AdjoinDef
section AdjoinIntermediateFieldLattice
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] {E : Type*} [Field E] [Algebra F E] {α : E} {S : Set E}
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_eq_bot_iff : adjoin F S = ⊥ ↔ S ⊆ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, adjoin_le_iff]; rfl
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_eq_bot_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_eq_bot_iff
/- Porting note: this was tagged `simp`. -/
theorem adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff : F⟮α⟯ = ⊥ ↔ α ∈ (⊥ : IntermediateField F E) := by
simp
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff IntermediateField.adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_zero : F⟮(0 : E)⟯ = ⊥ :=
adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (zero_mem ⊥)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_zero IntermediateField.adjoin_zero
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_one : F⟮(1 : E)⟯ = ⊥ :=
adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (one_mem ⊥)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_one IntermediateField.adjoin_one
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_intCast (n : ℤ) : F⟮(n : E)⟯ = ⊥ := by
exact adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (intCast_mem ⊥ n)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_int IntermediateField.adjoin_intCast
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_natCast (n : ℕ) : F⟮(n : E)⟯ = ⊥ :=
adjoin_simple_eq_bot_iff.mpr (natCast_mem ⊥ n)
#align intermediate_field.adjoin_nat IntermediateField.adjoin_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias adjoin_int := adjoin_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias adjoin_nat := adjoin_natCast
section AdjoinRank
open FiniteDimensional Module
variable {K L : IntermediateField F E}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Adjoin.lean | 968 | 970 | theorem rank_eq_one_iff : Module.rank F K = 1 ↔ K = ⊥ := by |
rw [← toSubalgebra_eq_iff, ← rank_eq_rank_subalgebra, Subalgebra.rank_eq_one_iff,
bot_toSubalgebra]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
#align_import number_theory.multiplicity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 39 | 43 | theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by |
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
_root_.map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# (Pre)images of intervals
In this file we prove a bunch of trivial lemmas like “if we add `a` to all points of `[b, c]`,
then we get `[a + b, a + c]`”. For the functions `x ↦ x ± a`, `x ↦ a ± x`, and `x ↦ -x` we prove
lemmas about preimages and images of all intervals. We also prove a few lemmas about images under
`x ↦ a * x`, `x ↦ x * a` and `x ↦ x⁻¹`.
-/
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Binary pointwise operations
Note that the subset operations below only cover the cases with the largest possible intervals on
the LHS: to conclude that `Ioo a b * Ioo c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (c * d)`, you can use monotonicity of `*`
and `Set.Ico_mul_Ioc_subset`.
TODO: repeat these lemmas for the generality of `mul_le_mul` (which assumes nonnegativity), which
the unprimed names have been reserved for
-/
section ContravariantLE
variable [Mul α] [Preorder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LE.le]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Icc c d ⊆ Icc (a * c) (b * d) := by
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_le_mul' hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iic b ⊆ Iic (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ici b ⊆ Ici (a * b) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_le_mul' hya hzb
end ContravariantLE
section ContravariantLT
variable [Mul α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· * ·) (· < ·)] [CovariantClass α α (Function.swap HMul.hMul) LT.lt]
@[to_additive Icc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Icc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Icc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Icc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Icc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Icc c d ⊆ Ico (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_le_mul' hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ioc_add_Ico_subset]
theorem Ioc_mul_Ico_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ioc a b * Ico c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Ico_add_Ioc_subset]
theorem Ico_mul_Ioc_subset' (a b c d : α) : Ico a b * Ioc c d ⊆ Ioo (a * c) (b * d) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, ⟨hya, hyb⟩, z, ⟨hzc, hzd⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzc, mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hyb hzd⟩
@[to_additive Iic_add_Iio_subset]
theorem Iic_mul_Iio_subset' (a b : α) : Iic a * Iio b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
@[to_additive Iio_add_Iic_subset]
theorem Iio_mul_Iic_subset' (a b : α) : Iio a * Iic b ⊆ Iio (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ioi_add_Ici_subset]
theorem Ioi_mul_Ici_subset' (a b : α) : Ioi a * Ici b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hya hzb
@[to_additive Ici_add_Ioi_subset]
theorem Ici_mul_Ioi_subset' (a b : α) : Ici a * Ioi b ⊆ Ioi (a * b) := by
haveI := covariantClass_le_of_lt
rintro x ⟨y, hya, z, hzb, rfl⟩
exact mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hya hzb
end ContravariantLT
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ -x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Preimages under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a + x`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x + a`
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ -x`
-/
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ a - x`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
/-!
### Images under `x ↦ x - a`
-/
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iic Set.image_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioi Set.image_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iio Set.image_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) '' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Icc Set.image_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) '' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ico Set.image_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioc Set.image_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioo Set.image_sub_const_Ioo
/-!
### Bijections
-/
theorem Iic_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iic b) (Iic (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iic a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iic_add_bij Set.Iic_add_bij
theorem Iio_add_bij : BijOn (· + a) (Iio b) (Iio (b + a)) :=
image_add_const_Iio a b ▸ (add_left_injective _).injOn.bijOn_image
#align set.Iio_add_bij Set.Iio_add_bij
end OrderedAddCommGroup
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_add_Icc, min_sub_sub_right, max_sub_sub_right]
#align set.preimage_const_add_uIcc Set.preimage_const_add_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simpa only [add_comm] using preimage_const_add_uIcc a b c
#align set.preimage_add_const_uIcc Set.preimage_add_const_uIcc
-- TODO: Why is the notation `-[[a, b]]` broken?
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_uIcc : @Neg.neg (Set α) Set.neg [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by
simp only [← Icc_min_max, preimage_neg_Icc, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_neg_uIcc Set.preimage_neg_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc Set.preimage_sub_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
simp_rw [← Icc_min_max, preimage_const_sub_Icc]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, min_add_add_left, max_add_add_left, min_neg_neg, max_neg_neg]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc Set.preimage_const_sub_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this module `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_uIcc : (fun x => a + x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a + b, a + c]] := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_uIcc Set.image_const_add_uIcc
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_uIcc : (fun x => x + a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b + a, c + a]] := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_uIcc Set.image_add_const_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_uIcc : (fun x => a - x) '' [[b, c]] = [[a - b, a - c]] := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_uIcc Set.image_const_sub_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_uIcc : (fun x => x - a) '' [[b, c]] = [[b - a, c - a]] := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm]
#align set.image_sub_const_uIcc Set.image_sub_const_uIcc
theorem image_neg_uIcc : Neg.neg '' [[a, b]] = [[-a, -b]] := by simp
#align set.image_neg_uIcc Set.image_neg_uIcc
variable {a b c d}
/-- If `[c, d]` is a subinterval of `[a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `d` is less than or
equal to that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc (h : [[c, d]] ⊆ [[a, b]]) : |d - c| ≤ |b - a| := by
rw [← max_sub_min_eq_abs, ← max_sub_min_eq_abs]
rw [uIcc_subset_uIcc_iff_le] at h
exact sub_le_sub h.2 h.1
#align set.abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc Set.abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc
/-- If `c ∈ [a, b]`, then the distance between `a` and `c` is less than or equal to
that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc (h : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : |c - a| ≤ |b - a| :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc_left h
#align set.abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc Set.abs_sub_left_of_mem_uIcc
/-- If `x ∈ [a, b]`, then the distance between `c` and `b` is less than or equal to
that of `a` and `b` -/
theorem abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc (h : c ∈ [[a, b]]) : |b - c| ≤ |b - a| :=
abs_sub_le_of_uIcc_subset_uIcc <| uIcc_subset_uIcc_right h
#align set.abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc Set.abs_sub_right_of_mem_uIcc
end LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
/-!
### Multiplication and inverse in a field
-/
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 634 | 635 | theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by | simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Markus Himmel, Bhavik Mehta, Andrew Yang, Emily Riehl
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.WidePullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7316286ff2942aa14e540add9058c6b0aa1c8070"
/-!
# Pullbacks
We define a category `WalkingCospan` (resp. `WalkingSpan`), which is the index category
for the given data for a pullback (resp. pushout) diagram. Convenience methods `cospan f g`
and `span f g` construct functors from the walking (co)span, hitting the given morphisms.
We define `pullback f g` and `pushout f g` as limits and colimits of such functors.
## References
* [Stacks: Fibre products](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001U)
* [Stacks: Pushouts](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0025)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
universe w v₁ v₂ v u u₂
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- attribute [local tidy] tactic.case_bash Porting note: no tidy, no local
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a pullback, defined as a special case of
`WidePullbackShape`. -/
abbrev WalkingCospan : Type :=
WidePullbackShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan
/-- The left point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.left : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.left
/-- The right point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.right : WalkingCospan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.right
/-- The central point of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingCospan.one : WalkingCospan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.one CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.one
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a pushout, defined as a special case of
`WidePushoutShape`.
-/
abbrev WalkingSpan : Type :=
WidePushoutShape WalkingPair
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan
/-- The left point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.left : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.left
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.left
/-- The right point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.right : WalkingSpan :=
some WalkingPair.right
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.right
/-- The central point of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev WalkingSpan.zero : WalkingSpan :=
none
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.zero CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.zero
namespace WalkingCospan
/-- The type of arrows for the diagram indexing a pullback. -/
abbrev Hom : WalkingCospan → WalkingCospan → Type :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom
/-- The left arrow of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.inl : left ⟶ one :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
/-- The right arrow of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.inr : right ⟶ one :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.term _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.inr
/-- The identity arrows of the walking cospan. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.id (X : WalkingCospan) : X ⟶ X :=
WidePullbackShape.Hom.id X
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.hom.id CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.Hom.id
instance (X Y : WalkingCospan) : Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y) := by
constructor; intros; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end WalkingCospan
namespace WalkingSpan
/-- The type of arrows for the diagram indexing a pushout. -/
abbrev Hom : WalkingSpan → WalkingSpan → Type :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom
/-- The left arrow of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.fst : zero ⟶ left :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
/-- The right arrow of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.snd : zero ⟶ right :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.init _
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.snd
/-- The identity arrows of the walking span. -/
@[match_pattern]
abbrev Hom.id (X : WalkingSpan) : X ⟶ X :=
WidePushoutShape.Hom.id X
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.hom.id CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.Hom.id
instance (X Y : WalkingSpan) : Subsingleton (X ⟶ Y) := by
constructor; intros a b; simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
end WalkingSpan
open WalkingSpan.Hom WalkingCospan.Hom WidePullbackShape.Hom WidePushoutShape.Hom
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
/-- To construct an isomorphism of cones over the walking cospan,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cone points and check it commutes with the legs to `left` and `right`. -/
def WalkingCospan.ext {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} {s t : Cone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.left = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.π.app WalkingCospan.right = i.hom ≫ t.π.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₁
have h₂ := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.id_comp] at h₂
simp_rw [h₂, ← Category.assoc, ← w₁, ← h₁]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_cospan.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingCospan.ext
/-- To construct an isomorphism of cocones over the walking span,
it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cocone points and check it commutes with the legs from `left` and `right`. -/
def WalkingSpan.ext {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} {s t : Cocone F} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt)
(w₁ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.left ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.left)
(w₂ : s.ι.app WalkingCospan.right ≫ i.hom = t.ι.app WalkingCospan.right) : s ≅ t := by
apply Cocones.ext i _
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
· have h₁ := s.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₁
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₁
have h₂ := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at h₂
simp only [Category.comp_id] at h₂
simp_rw [← h₁, Category.assoc, w₁, h₂]
· exact w₁
· exact w₂
#align category_theory.limits.walking_span.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingSpan.ext
/-- `cospan f g` is the functor from the walking cospan hitting `f` and `g`. -/
def cospan {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : WalkingCospan ⥤ C :=
WidePullbackShape.wideCospan Z (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan
/-- `span f g` is the functor from the walking span hitting `f` and `g`. -/
def span {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : WalkingSpan ⥤ C :=
WidePushoutShape.wideSpan X (fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j Y Z) fun j =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
#align category_theory.limits.span CategoryTheory.Limits.span
@[simp]
theorem cospan_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_left
@[simp]
theorem span_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.left = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_left CategoryTheory.Limits.span_left
@[simp]
theorem cospan_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.right = Y := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_right
@[simp]
theorem span_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.right = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_right CategoryTheory.Limits.span_right
@[simp]
theorem cospan_one {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : (cospan f g).obj WalkingCospan.one = Z :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_one
@[simp]
theorem span_zero {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).obj WalkingSpan.zero = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.span_zero
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inl {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inl = f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inl
@[simp]
theorem span_map_fst {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.fst = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_fst
@[simp]
theorem cospan_map_inr {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(cospan f g).map WalkingCospan.Hom.inr = g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_inr
@[simp]
theorem span_map_snd {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) : (span f g).map WalkingSpan.Hom.snd = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_snd
theorem cospan_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingCospan) :
(cospan f g).map (WalkingCospan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.cospan_map_id
theorem span_map_id {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (w : WalkingSpan) :
(span f g).map (WalkingSpan.Hom.id w) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_map_id CategoryTheory.Limits.span_map_id
/-- Every diagram indexing a pullback is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `cospan` -/
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoCospan (F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C) : F ≅ cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_cospan CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoCospan
/-- Every diagram indexing a pushout is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `span` -/
-- @[simps (config := { rhsMd := semireducible })] Porting note: no semireducible
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoSpan (F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C) : F ≅ span (F.map fst) (F.map snd) :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(fun j => eqToIso (by rcases j with (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> rfl))
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_span CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoSpan
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-- A functor applied to a cospan is a cospan. -/
def cospanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
cospan f g ⋙ F ≅ cospan (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.right = Iso.refl _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).app WalkingCospan.one = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_hom_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_left : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_right : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanCompIso_inv_app_one : (cospanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_comp_iso_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanCompIso_inv_app_one
end
/-- A functor applied to a span is a span. -/
def spanCompIso (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
span f g ⋙ F ≅ span (F.map f) (F.map g) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> exact Iso.refl _)
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp)
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.left = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.right = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).app WalkingSpan.zero = Iso.refl _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_hom_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_left : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_right : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanCompIso_inv_app_zero : (spanCompIso F f g).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.span_comp_iso_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanCompIso_inv_app_zero
end
section
variable {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C} (iX : X ≅ X') (iY : Y ≅ Y') (iZ : Z ≅ Z')
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Z'} {g' : Y' ⟶ Z'}
/-- Construct an isomorphism of cospans from components. -/
def cospanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
cospan f g ≅ cospan f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iZ, iX, iY])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iZ.hom) (wg : iY.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_left : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.left = iX := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_right : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.right = iY := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingCospan.one = iZ := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.hom := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_hom_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_hom_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_hom_app_one
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_left :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.left = iX.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_right :
(cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.right = iY.inv := by dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem cospanExt_inv_app_one : (cospanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingCospan.one = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [cospanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.cospan_ext_inv_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.cospanExt_inv_app_one
end
section
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} {g' : X' ⟶ Z'}
/-- Construct an isomorphism of spans from components. -/
def spanExt (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom) :
span f g ≅ span f' g' :=
NatIso.ofComponents (by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exacts [iX, iY, iZ])
(by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> simp [wf, wg])
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt
variable (wf : iX.hom ≫ f' = f ≫ iY.hom) (wg : iX.hom ≫ g' = g ≫ iZ.hom)
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.left = iY := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.right = iZ := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_app_one : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).app WalkingSpan.zero = iX := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_app_one
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_hom_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).hom.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.hom := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_hom_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_hom_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_left : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.left = iY.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_left
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_right : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.right = iZ.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_right
@[simp]
theorem spanExt_inv_app_zero : (spanExt iX iY iZ wf wg).inv.app WalkingSpan.zero = iX.inv := by
dsimp [spanExt]
#align category_theory.limits.span_ext_inv_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.spanExt_inv_app_zero
end
end
variable {W X Y Z : C}
/-- A pullback cone is just a cone on the cospan formed by two morphisms `f : X ⟶ Z` and
`g : Y ⟶ Z`. -/
abbrev PullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
Cone (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone
namespace PullbackCone
variable {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
/-- The first projection of a pullback cone. -/
abbrev fst (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ X :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst
/-- The second projection of a pullback cone. -/
abbrev snd (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.pt ⟶ Y :=
t.π.app WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd
@[simp]
theorem π_app_left (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.left = c.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem π_app_right (c : PullbackCone f g) : c.π.app WalkingCospan.right = c.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_one (t : PullbackCone f g) : t.π.app WalkingCospan.one = t.fst ≫ f := by
have w := t.π.naturality WalkingCospan.Hom.inl
dsimp at w; simpa using w
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition_one
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a pullback cone is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isLimitAux (t : PullbackCone f g) (lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ t.snd = s.snd)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s) : IsLimit t :=
{ lift
fac := fun s j => Option.casesOn j (by
rw [← s.w inl, ← t.w inl, ← Category.assoc]
congr
exact fac_left s)
fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a pullback cone is a limit cone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def isLimitAux' (t : PullbackCone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PullbackCone f g,
{ l //
l ≫ t.fst = s.fst ∧
l ≫ t.snd = s.snd ∧ ∀ {m}, m ≫ t.fst = s.fst → m ≫ t.snd = s.snd → m = l }) :
Limits.IsLimit t :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1)
(fun s => (create s).2.2.1) fun s _ w =>
(create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
/-- A pullback cone on `f` and `g` is determined by morphisms `fst : W ⟶ X` and `snd : W ⟶ Y`
such that `fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) : PullbackCone f g where
pt := W
π := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (fst ≫ f) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' fst snd
naturality := by rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩) j <;> cases j <;> dsimp <;> simp [eq] }
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_left {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.left = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_right {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.right = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_π_app_one {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).π.app WalkingCospan.one = fst ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_π_app_one CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one
@[simp]
theorem mk_fst {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).fst = fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem mk_snd {W : C} (fst : W ⟶ X) (snd : W ⟶ Y) (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g) :
(mk fst snd eq).snd = snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mk_snd
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PullbackCone f g) : fst t ≫ f = snd t ≫ g :=
(t.w inl).trans (t.w inr).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.condition
/-- To check whether a morphism is equalized by the maps of a pullback cone, it suffices to check
it for `fst t` and `snd t` -/
theorem equalizer_ext (t : PullbackCone f g) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt} (h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t)
(h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : ∀ j : WalkingCospan, k ≫ t.π.app j = l ≫ t.π.app j
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w inl, reassoc_of% h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.equalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.equalizer_ext
theorem IsLimit.hom_ext {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} {k l : W ⟶ t.pt}
(h₀ : k ≫ fst t = l ≫ fst t) (h₁ : k ≫ snd t = l ≫ snd t) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext
theorem mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono f] :
Mono t.snd := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht ?_ i⟩
rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ g) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono
theorem mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) [Mono g] :
Mono t.fst := by
refine ⟨fun {W} h k i => IsLimit.hom_ext ht i ?_⟩
rw [← cancel_mono g, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← condition]
have := congrArg (· ≫ f) i; dsimp at this
rwa [Category.assoc, Category.assoc] at this
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono
/-- To construct an isomorphism of pullback cones, it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cone points and check it commutes with `fst` and `snd`. -/
def ext {s t : PullbackCone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.fst = i.hom ≫ t.fst)
(w₂ : s.snd = i.hom ≫ t.snd) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingCospan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ext
-- Porting note: `IsLimit.lift` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/-- If `t` is a limit pullback cone over `f` and `g` and `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` are such that
`h ≫ f = k ≫ g`, then we get `l : W ⟶ t.pt`, which satisfies `l ≫ fst t = h`
and `l ≫ snd t = k`, see `IsLimit.lift_fst` and `IsLimit.lift_snd`. -/
def IsLimit.lift {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ t.pt :=
ht.lift <| PullbackCone.mk _ _ w
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_fst {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ fst t = h := ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsLimit.lift_snd {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : IsLimit.lift ht h k w ≫ snd t = k := ht.fac _ _
/-- If `t` is a limit pullback cone over `f` and `g` and `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` are such that
`h ≫ f = k ≫ g`, then we have `l : W ⟶ t.pt` satisfying `l ≫ fst t = h` and `l ≫ snd t = k`.
-/
def IsLimit.lift' {t : PullbackCone f g} (ht : IsLimit t) {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ t.pt // l ≫ fst t = h ∧ l ≫ snd t = k } :=
⟨IsLimit.lift ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift'
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `PullbackCone` constructed using
`PullbackCone.mk` is a limit cone.
-/
def IsLimit.mk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (eq : fst ≫ f = snd ≫ g)
(lift : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PullbackCone f g, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PullbackCone f g) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (mk fst snd eq) :=
isLimitAux _ lift fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk
section Flip
variable (t : PullbackCone f g)
/-- The pullback cone obtained by flipping `fst` and `snd`. -/
def flip : PullbackCone g f := PullbackCone.mk _ _ t.condition.symm
@[simp] lemma flip_pt : t.flip.pt = t.pt := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_fst : t.flip.fst = t.snd := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_snd : t.flip.snd = t.fst := rfl
/-- Flipping a pullback cone twice gives an isomorphic cone. -/
def flipFlipIso : t.flip.flip ≅ t := PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
variable {t}
/-- The flip of a pullback square is a pullback square. -/
def flipIsLimit (ht : IsLimit t) : IsLimit t.flip :=
IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => ht.lift s.flip) (by simp) (by simp) (fun s m h₁ h₂ => by
apply IsLimit.hom_ext ht
all_goals aesop_cat)
/-- A square is a pullback square if its flip is. -/
def isLimitOfFlip (ht : IsLimit t.flip) : IsLimit t :=
IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (flipIsLimit ht) t.flipFlipIso
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.flip_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
end Flip
/--
The pullback cone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` for the pair `(f, f)` is a limit if `f` is a mono. The converse is
shown in `mono_of_pullback_is_id`.
-/
def isLimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : IsLimit (mk (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) rfl : PullbackCone f f) :=
IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => s.fst) (fun s => Category.comp_id _)
(fun s => by rw [← cancel_mono f, Category.comp_id, s.condition]) fun s m m₁ _ => by
simpa using m₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId
/--
`f` is a mono if the pullback cone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` is a limit for the pair `(f, f)`. The converse is
given in `PullbackCone.is_id_of_mono`.
-/
theorem mono_of_isLimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) (t : IsLimit (mk (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) rfl : PullbackCone f f)) :
Mono f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h eq => by
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' t _ _ eq with ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.mono_of_is_limit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.mono_of_isLimitMkIdId
/-- Suppose `f` and `g` are two morphisms with a common codomain and `s` is a limit cone over the
diagram formed by `f` and `g`. Suppose `f` and `g` both factor through a monomorphism `h` via
`x` and `y`, respectively. Then `s` is also a limit cone over the diagram formed by `x` and
`y`. -/
def isLimitOfFactors (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ Z) [Mono h] (x : X ⟶ W) (y : Y ⟶ W)
(hxh : x ≫ h = f) (hyh : y ≫ h = g) (s : PullbackCone f g) (hs : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show s.fst ≫ x = s.snd ≫ y from
(cancel_mono h).1 <| by simp only [Category.assoc, hxh, hyh, s.condition])) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun t =>
have : fst t ≫ x ≫ h = snd t ≫ y ≫ h := by -- Porting note: reassoc workaround
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc]
apply congrArg (· ≫ h) t.condition
⟨hs.lift (PullbackCone.mk t.fst t.snd <| by rw [← hxh, ← hyh, this]),
⟨hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.right, fun hr hr' => by
apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext hs <;>
simp only [PullbackCone.mk_fst, PullbackCone.mk_snd] at hr hr' ⊢ <;>
simp only [hr, hr'] <;>
symm
exacts [hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingCospan.right]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_of_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfFactors
/-- If `W` is the pullback of `f, g`,
it is also the pullback of `f ≫ i, g ≫ i` for any mono `i`. -/
def isLimitOfCompMono (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) (i : W ⟶ Z) [Mono i] (s : PullbackCone f g)
(H : IsLimit s) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show s.fst ≫ f ≫ i = s.snd ≫ g ≫ i by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc, s.condition])) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' H s.fst s.snd
((cancel_mono i).mp (by simpa using s.condition)) with
⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨l, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
intro m hm₁ hm₂
exact (PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H (hm₁.trans h₁.symm) (hm₂.trans h₂.symm) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.is_limit_of_comp_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isLimitOfCompMono
end PullbackCone
/-- A pushout cocone is just a cocone on the span formed by two morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` and
`g : X ⟶ Z`. -/
abbrev PushoutCocone (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
Cocone (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone
namespace PushoutCocone
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z}
/-- The first inclusion of a pushout cocone. -/
abbrev inl (t : PushoutCocone f g) : Y ⟶ t.pt :=
t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl
/-- The second inclusion of a pushout cocone. -/
abbrev inr (t : PushoutCocone f g) : Z ⟶ t.pt :=
t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr
@[simp]
theorem ι_app_left (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.ι.app WalkingSpan.left = c.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem ι_app_right (c : PushoutCocone f g) : c.ι.app WalkingSpan.right = c.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ι_app_right
@[simp]
theorem condition_zero (t : PushoutCocone f g) : t.ι.app WalkingSpan.zero = f ≫ t.inl := by
have w := t.ι.naturality WalkingSpan.Hom.fst
dsimp at w; simpa using w.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.condition_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.condition_zero
/-- This is a slightly more convenient method to verify that a pushout cocone is a colimit cocone.
It only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content -/
def isColimitAux (t : PushoutCocone f g) (desc : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, t.inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq : ∀ (s : PushoutCocone f g) (m : t.pt ⟶ s.pt)
(_ : ∀ j : WalkingSpan, t.ι.app j ≫ m = s.ι.app j), m = desc s) : IsColimit t :=
{ desc
fac := fun s j =>
Option.casesOn j (by simp [← s.w fst, ← t.w fst, fac_left s]) fun j' =>
WalkingPair.casesOn j' (fac_left s) (fac_right s)
uniq := uniq }
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_aux CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitAux
/-- This is another convenient method to verify that a pushout cocone is a colimit cocone. It
only asks for a proof of facts that carry any mathematical content, and allows access to the
same `s` for all parts. -/
def isColimitAux' (t : PushoutCocone f g)
(create :
∀ s : PushoutCocone f g,
{ l //
t.inl ≫ l = s.inl ∧
t.inr ≫ l = s.inr ∧ ∀ {m}, t.inl ≫ m = s.inl → t.inr ≫ m = s.inr → m = l }) :
IsColimit t :=
isColimitAux t (fun s => (create s).1) (fun s => (create s).2.1) (fun s => (create s).2.2.1)
fun s _ w => (create s).2.2.2 (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_aux' CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
/-- A pushout cocone on `f` and `g` is determined by morphisms `inl : Y ⟶ W` and `inr : Z ⟶ W` such
that `f ≫ inl = g ↠ inr`. -/
@[simps]
def mk {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) : PushoutCocone f g where
pt := W
ι := { app := fun j => Option.casesOn j (f ≫ inl) fun j' => WalkingPair.casesOn j' inl inr
naturality := by
rintro (⟨⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩) (⟨⟩|⟨⟨⟩⟩) <;> intro f <;> cases f <;> dsimp <;> aesop }
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_left {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.left = inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_right {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.right = inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_right
@[simp]
theorem mk_ι_app_zero {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).ι.app WalkingSpan.zero = f ≫ inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_ι_app_zero CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_ι_app_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_inl {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).inl = inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inr {W : C} (inl : Y ⟶ W) (inr : Z ⟶ W) (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr) :
(mk inl inr eq).inr = inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.mk_inr
@[reassoc]
theorem condition (t : PushoutCocone f g) : f ≫ inl t = g ≫ inr t :=
(t.w fst).trans (t.w snd).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.condition
/-- To check whether a morphism is coequalized by the maps of a pushout cocone, it suffices to check
it for `inl t` and `inr t` -/
theorem coequalizer_ext (t : PushoutCocone f g) {W : C} {k l : t.pt ⟶ W}
(h₀ : inl t ≫ k = inl t ≫ l) (h₁ : inr t ≫ k = inr t ≫ l) :
∀ j : WalkingSpan, t.ι.app j ≫ k = t.ι.app j ≫ l
| some WalkingPair.left => h₀
| some WalkingPair.right => h₁
| none => by rw [← t.w fst, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, h₀]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.coequalizer_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext
theorem IsColimit.hom_ext {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} {k l : t.pt ⟶ W}
(h₀ : inl t ≫ k = inl t ≫ l) (h₁ : inr t ≫ k = inr t ≫ l) : k = l :=
ht.hom_ext <| coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext
-- Porting note: `IsColimit.desc` and the two following simp lemmas were introduced to ease the port
/-- If `t` is a colimit pushout cocone over `f` and `g` and `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` are
morphisms satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k`, then we have a factorization `l : t.pt ⟶ W` such that
`inl t ≫ l = h` and `inr t ≫ l = k`, see `IsColimit.inl_desc` and `IsColimit.inr_desc`-/
def IsColimit.desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : t.pt ⟶ W :=
ht.desc (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ w)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsColimit.inl_desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : inl t ≫ IsColimit.desc ht h k w = h :=
ht.fac _ _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma IsColimit.inr_desc {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : inr t ≫ IsColimit.desc ht h k w = k :=
ht.fac _ _
/-- If `t` is a colimit pushout cocone over `f` and `g` and `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` are
morphisms satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k`, then we have a factorization `l : t.pt ⟶ W` such that
`inl t ≫ l = h` and `inr t ≫ l = k`. -/
def IsColimit.desc' {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) {W : C} (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : t.pt ⟶ W // inl t ≫ l = h ∧ inr t ≫ l = k } :=
⟨IsColimit.desc ht h k w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc'
theorem epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) [Epi f] :
Epi t.inr :=
⟨fun {W} h k i => IsColimit.hom_ext ht (by simp [← cancel_epi f, t.condition_assoc, i]) i⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi
theorem epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi {t : PushoutCocone f g} (ht : IsColimit t) [Epi g] :
Epi t.inl :=
⟨fun {W} h k i => IsColimit.hom_ext ht i (by simp [← cancel_epi g, ← t.condition_assoc, i])⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi
/-- To construct an isomorphism of pushout cocones, it suffices to construct an isomorphism
of the cocone points and check it commutes with `inl` and `inr`. -/
def ext {s t : PushoutCocone f g} (i : s.pt ≅ t.pt) (w₁ : s.inl ≫ i.hom = t.inl)
(w₂ : s.inr ≫ i.hom = t.inr) : s ≅ t :=
WalkingSpan.ext i w₁ w₂
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.ext CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ext
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `PushoutCocone` constructed using
`PushoutCocone.mk` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def IsColimit.mk {W : C} {inl : Y ⟶ W} {inr : Z ⟶ W} (eq : f ≫ inl = g ≫ inr)
(desc : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : PushoutCocone f g, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : PushoutCocone f g) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (mk inl inr eq) :=
isColimitAux _ desc fac_left fac_right fun s m w =>
uniq s m (w WalkingCospan.left) (w WalkingCospan.right)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk
section Flip
variable (t : PushoutCocone f g)
/-- The pushout cocone obtained by flipping `inl` and `inr`. -/
def flip : PushoutCocone g f := PushoutCocone.mk _ _ t.condition.symm
@[simp] lemma flip_pt : t.flip.pt = t.pt := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_inl : t.flip.inl = t.inr := rfl
@[simp] lemma flip_inr : t.flip.inr = t.inl := rfl
/-- Flipping a pushout cocone twice gives an isomorphic cocone. -/
def flipFlipIso : t.flip.flip ≅ t := PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp)
variable {t}
/-- The flip of a pushout square is a pushout square. -/
def flipIsColimit (ht : IsColimit t) : IsColimit t.flip :=
IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => ht.desc s.flip) (by simp) (by simp) (fun s m h₁ h₂ => by
apply IsColimit.hom_ext ht
all_goals aesop_cat)
/-- A square is a pushout square if its flip is. -/
def isColimitOfFlip (ht : IsColimit t.flip) : IsColimit t :=
IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (flipIsColimit ht) t.flipFlipIso
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.flip_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
end Flip
/--
The pushout cocone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` for the pair `(f, f)` is a colimit if `f` is an epi. The converse is
shown in `epi_of_isColimit_mk_id_id`.
-/
def isColimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] : IsColimit (mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : PushoutCocone f f) :=
IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => s.inl) (fun s => Category.id_comp _)
(fun s => by rw [← cancel_epi f, Category.id_comp, s.condition]) fun s m m₁ _ => by
simpa using m₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId
/-- `f` is an epi if the pushout cocone `(𝟙 X, 𝟙 X)` is a colimit for the pair `(f, f)`.
The converse is given in `PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId`.
-/
theorem epi_of_isColimitMkIdId (f : X ⟶ Y)
(t : IsColimit (mk (𝟙 Y) (𝟙 Y) rfl : PushoutCocone f f)) : Epi f :=
⟨fun {Z} g h eq => by
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' t _ _ eq with ⟨_, rfl, rfl⟩
rfl⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.epi_of_is_colimit_mk_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.epi_of_isColimitMkIdId
/-- Suppose `f` and `g` are two morphisms with a common domain and `s` is a colimit cocone over the
diagram formed by `f` and `g`. Suppose `f` and `g` both factor through an epimorphism `h` via
`x` and `y`, respectively. Then `s` is also a colimit cocone over the diagram formed by `x` and
`y`. -/
def isColimitOfFactors (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : X ⟶ W) [Epi h] (x : W ⟶ Y) (y : W ⟶ Z)
(hhx : h ≫ x = f) (hhy : h ≫ y = g) (s : PushoutCocone f g) (hs : IsColimit s) :
have reassoc₁ : h ≫ x ≫ inl s = f ≫ inl s := by -- Porting note: working around reassoc
rw [← Category.assoc]; apply congrArg (· ≫ inl s) hhx
have reassoc₂ : h ≫ y ≫ inr s = g ≫ inr s := by
rw [← Category.assoc]; apply congrArg (· ≫ inr s) hhy
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ (show x ≫ s.inl = y ≫ s.inr from
(cancel_epi h).1 <| by rw [reassoc₁, reassoc₂, s.condition])) :=
PushoutCocone.isColimitAux' _ fun t => ⟨hs.desc (PushoutCocone.mk t.inl t.inr <| by
rw [← hhx, ← hhy, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, t.condition]),
⟨hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.left, hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.right, fun hr hr' => by
apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext hs;
· simp only [PushoutCocone.mk_inl, PushoutCocone.mk_inr] at hr hr' ⊢
simp only [hr, hr']
symm
exact hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.left
· simp only [PushoutCocone.mk_inl, PushoutCocone.mk_inr] at hr hr' ⊢
simp only [hr, hr']
symm
exact hs.fac _ WalkingSpan.right⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_of_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFactors
/-- If `W` is the pushout of `f, g`,
it is also the pushout of `h ≫ f, h ≫ g` for any epi `h`. -/
def isColimitOfEpiComp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h] (s : PushoutCocone f g)
(H : IsColimit s) :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk _ _
(show (h ≫ f) ≫ s.inl = (h ≫ g) ≫ s.inr by
rw [Category.assoc, Category.assoc, s.condition])) := by
apply PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
intro s
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' H s.inl s.inr
((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using s.condition)) with
⟨l, h₁, h₂⟩
refine ⟨l, h₁, h₂, ?_⟩
intro m hm₁ hm₂
exact (PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H (hm₁.trans h₁.symm) (hm₂.trans h₂.symm) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.is_colimit_of_epi_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isColimitOfEpiComp
end PushoutCocone
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
pullbacks. Given `F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr)`, and a pullback cone on `F.map inl` and `F.map inr`, we
get a cone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasPullbacks_of_hasLimit_cospan`,
which you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
@[simps]
def Cone.ofPullbackCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr)) :
Cone F where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).inv
#align category_theory.limits.cone.of_pullback_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.ofPullbackCone
/-- This is a helper construction that can be useful when verifying that a category has all
pushout. Given `F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as
`span (F.map fst) (F.map snd)`, and a pushout cocone on `F.map fst` and `F.map snd`,
we get a cocone on `F`.
If you're thinking about using this, have a look at `hasPushouts_of_hasColimit_span`, which
you may find to be an easier way of achieving your goal. -/
@[simps]
def Cocone.ofPushoutCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd)) :
Cocone F where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).hom ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.of_pushout_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.ofPushoutCocone
/-- Given `F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as `cospan (F.map inl) (F.map inr)`,
and a cone on `F`, we get a pullback cone on `F.map inl` and `F.map inr`. -/
@[simps]
def PullbackCone.ofCone {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
PullbackCone (F.map inl) (F.map inr) where
pt := t.pt
π := t.π ≫ (diagramIsoCospan F).hom
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.of_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.ofCone
/-- A diagram `WalkingCospan ⥤ C` is isomorphic to some `PullbackCone.mk` after
composing with `diagramIsoCospan`. -/
@[simps!]
def PullbackCone.isoMk {F : WalkingCospan ⥤ C} (t : Cone F) :
(Cones.postcompose (diagramIsoCospan.{v} _).hom).obj t ≅
PullbackCone.mk (t.π.app WalkingCospan.left) (t.π.app WalkingCospan.right)
((t.π.naturality inl).symm.trans (t.π.naturality inr : _)) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.isoMk
/-- Given `F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C`, which is really the same as `span (F.map fst) (F.map snd)`,
and a cocone on `F`, we get a pushout cocone on `F.map fst` and `F.map snd`. -/
@[simps]
def PushoutCocone.ofCocone {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
PushoutCocone (F.map fst) (F.map snd) where
pt := t.pt
ι := (diagramIsoSpan F).inv ≫ t.ι
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.of_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.ofCocone
/-- A diagram `WalkingSpan ⥤ C` is isomorphic to some `PushoutCocone.mk` after composing with
`diagramIsoSpan`. -/
@[simps!]
def PushoutCocone.isoMk {F : WalkingSpan ⥤ C} (t : Cocone F) :
(Cocones.precompose (diagramIsoSpan.{v} _).inv).obj t ≅
PushoutCocone.mk (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.left) (t.ι.app WalkingSpan.right)
((t.ι.naturality fst).trans (t.ι.naturality snd).symm) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) <| by
rintro (_ | (_ | _)) <;>
· dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.iso_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.isoMk
/-- `HasPullback f g` represents a particular choice of limiting cone
for the pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Z` and `g : Y ⟶ Z`.
-/
abbrev HasPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :=
HasLimit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPullback
/-- `HasPushout f g` represents a particular choice of colimiting cocone
for the pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y` and `g : X ⟶ Z`.
-/
abbrev HasPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasColimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.HasPushout
/-- `pullback f g` computes the pullback of a pair of morphisms with the same target. -/
abbrev pullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :=
limit (cospan f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback
/-- `pushout f g` computes the pushout of a pair of morphisms with the same source. -/
abbrev pushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :=
colimit (span f g)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout
/-- The first projection of the pullback of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pullback.fst {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ X :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst
/-- The second projection of the pullback of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pullback.snd {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (cospan f g) WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd
/-- The first inclusion into the pushout of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pushout.inl {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Y ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl
/-- The second inclusion into the pushout of `f` and `g`. -/
abbrev pushout.inr {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] : Z ⟶ pushout f g :=
colimit.ι (span f g) WalkingSpan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` satisfying `h ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism
`pullback.lift : W ⟶ pullback f g`. -/
abbrev pullback.lift {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : W ⟶ pullback f g :=
limit.lift _ (PullbackCone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k` induces a morphism
`pushout.desc : pushout f g ⟶ W`. -/
abbrev pushout.desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout f g ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (PushoutCocone.mk h k w)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.desc
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.fst (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.fst := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.fst_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.fst_colimit_cocone
@[simp]
theorem PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasLimit (cospan f g)] : PullbackCone.snd (limit.cone (cospan f g)) = pullback.snd := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone.snd_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PullbackCone.snd_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inl (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inl_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inl_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y)
[HasColimit (span f g)] : PushoutCocone.inr (colimit.cocone (span f g)) = pushout.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone.inr_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.PushoutCocone.inr_colimit_cocone
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_fst {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.fst = h :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_fst
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.lift_snd {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X)
(k : W ⟶ Y) (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : pullback.lift h k w ≫ pullback.snd = k :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift_snd
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inl_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inl ≫ pushout.desc h k w = h :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_desc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this and reassoced version; removed simp
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.inr_desc {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W)
(k : Z ⟶ W) (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : pushout.inr ≫ pushout.desc h k w = k :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_desc
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : W ⟶ X` and `k : W ⟶ Y` satisfying `h ≫ f = k ≫ g` induces a morphism
`l : W ⟶ pullback f g` such that `l ≫ pullback.fst = h` and `l ≫ pullback.snd = k`. -/
def pullback.lift' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] (h : W ⟶ X) (k : W ⟶ Y)
(w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) : { l : W ⟶ pullback f g // l ≫ pullback.fst = h ∧ l ≫ pullback.snd = k } :=
⟨pullback.lift h k w, pullback.lift_fst _ _ _, pullback.lift_snd _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.lift'
/-- A pair of morphisms `h : Y ⟶ W` and `k : Z ⟶ W` satisfying `f ≫ h = g ≫ k` induces a morphism
`l : pushout f g ⟶ W` such that `pushout.inl ≫ l = h` and `pushout.inr ≫ l = k`. -/
def pullback.desc' {W X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] (h : Y ⟶ W) (k : Z ⟶ W)
(w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) : { l : pushout f g ⟶ W // pushout.inl ≫ l = h ∧ pushout.inr ≫ l = k } :=
⟨pushout.desc h k w, pushout.inl_desc _ _ _, pushout.inr_desc _ _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.desc'
@[reassoc]
theorem pullback.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) ≫ f = pullback.snd ≫ g :=
PullbackCone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.condition
@[reassoc]
theorem pushout.condition {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] :
f ≫ (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) = g ≫ pushout.inr :=
PushoutCocone.condition _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.condition CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.condition
/-- Given such a diagram, then there is a natural morphism `W ×ₛ X ⟶ Y ×ₜ Z`.
W ⟶ Y
↘ ↘
S ⟶ T
↗ ↗
X ⟶ Z
-/
abbrev pullback.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂] (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ pullback g₁ g₂ :=
pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ i₁) (pullback.snd ≫ i₂)
(by simp [← eq₁, ← eq₂, pullback.condition_assoc])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map
/-- The canonical map `X ×ₛ Y ⟶ X ×ₜ Y` given `S ⟶ T`. -/
abbrev pullback.mapDesc {X Y S T : C} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] : pullback f g ⟶ pullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) :=
pullback.map f g (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc
/-- Given such a diagram, then there is a natural morphism `W ⨿ₛ X ⟶ Y ⨿ₜ Z`.
W ⟶ Y
↗ ↗
S ⟶ T
↘ ↘
X ⟶ Z
-/
abbrev pushout.map {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂] (g₁ : T ⟶ Y)
(g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) : pushout f₁ f₂ ⟶ pushout g₁ g₂ :=
pushout.desc (i₁ ≫ pushout.inl) (i₂ ≫ pushout.inr)
(by
simp only [← Category.assoc, eq₁, eq₂]
simp [pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map
/-- The canonical map `X ⨿ₛ Y ⟶ X ⨿ₜ Y` given `S ⟶ T`. -/
abbrev pushout.mapLift {X Y S T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] : pushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) ⟶ pushout f g :=
pushout.map (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g) f g (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) i (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift
/-- Two morphisms into a pullback are equal if their compositions with the pullback morphisms are
equal -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem pullback.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] {W : C}
{k l : W ⟶ pullback f g} (h₀ : k ≫ pullback.fst = l ≫ pullback.fst)
(h₁ : k ≫ pullback.snd = l ≫ pullback.snd) : k = l :=
limit.hom_ext <| PullbackCone.equalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.hom_ext
/-- The pullback cone built from the pullback projections is a pullback. -/
def pullbackIsPullback {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] :
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) pullback.snd pullback.condition) :=
PullbackCone.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => pullback.lift s.fst s.snd s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsPullback
/-- The pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism -/
instance pullback.fst_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono g] :
Mono (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
PullbackCone.mono_fst_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.fst_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.fst_of_mono
/-- The pullback of a monomorphism is a monomorphism -/
instance pullback.snd_of_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} [HasPullback f g] [Mono f] :
Mono (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
PullbackCone.mono_snd_of_is_pullback_of_mono (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.snd_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.snd_of_mono
/-- The map `X ×[Z] Y ⟶ X × Y` is mono. -/
instance mono_pullback_to_prod {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
[HasPullback f g] [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
Mono (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.fst) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => f ≫ prod.snd) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.mono_pullback_to_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.mono_pullback_to_prod
/-- Two morphisms out of a pushout are equal if their compositions with the pushout morphisms are
equal -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem pushout.hom_ext {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] {W : C}
{k l : pushout f g ⟶ W} (h₀ : pushout.inl ≫ k = pushout.inl ≫ l)
(h₁ : pushout.inr ≫ k = pushout.inr ≫ l) : k = l :=
colimit.hom_ext <| PushoutCocone.coequalizer_ext _ h₀ h₁
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.hom_ext
/-- The pushout cocone built from the pushout coprojections is a pushout. -/
def pushoutIsPushout {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f g) pushout.inr pushout.condition) :=
PushoutCocone.IsColimit.mk _ (fun s => pushout.desc s.inl s.inr s.condition) (by simp) (by simp)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsPushout
/-- The pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism -/
instance pushout.inl_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi g] :
Epi (pushout.inl : Y ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inl_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inl_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inl_of_epi
/-- The pushout of an epimorphism is an epimorphism -/
instance pushout.inr_of_epi {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : X ⟶ Z} [HasPushout f g] [Epi f] :
Epi (pushout.inr : Z ⟶ pushout f g) :=
PushoutCocone.epi_inr_of_is_pushout_of_epi (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.inr_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.inr_of_epi
/-- The map `X ⨿ Y ⟶ X ⨿[Z] Y` is epi. -/
instance epi_coprod_to_pushout {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
[HasPushout f g] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] :
Epi (coprod.desc pushout.inl pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) :=
⟨fun {W} i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inl ≫ f) h
· simpa using congrArg (fun f => coprod.inr ≫ f) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.epi_coprod_to_pushout
instance pullback.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) [HasPullback f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : Y ⟶ T) (g₂ : Z ⟶ T) [HasPullback g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.map_isIso
/-- If `f₁ = f₂` and `g₁ = g₂`, we may construct a canonical
isomorphism `pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂` -/
@[simps! hom]
def pullback.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] : pullback f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pullback.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Z} {g₁ g₂ : Y ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPullback f₁ g₁] [HasPullback f₂ g₂] :
(pullback.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pullback.lift_fst]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_fst_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
· erw [pullback.lift_snd]
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
erw [pullback.lift_snd_assoc]
rw [Category.comp_id, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.congrHom_inv
instance pushout.map_isIso {W X Y Z S T : C} (f₁ : S ⟶ W) (f₂ : S ⟶ X) [HasPushout f₁ f₂]
(g₁ : T ⟶ Y) (g₂ : T ⟶ Z) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T)
(eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₁ = i₃ ≫ g₁) (eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₂ = i₃ ≫ g₂) [IsIso i₁] [IsIso i₂] [IsIso i₃] :
IsIso (pushout.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.map _ _ _ _ (inv i₁) (inv i₂) (inv i₃) ?_ ?_, ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₁, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [IsIso.comp_inv_eq, Category.assoc, eq₂, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· aesop_cat
· aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_is_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.map_isIso
theorem pullback.mapDesc_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (i : T ⟶ S) (i' : S ⟶ S')
[HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)] [HasPullback (f ≫ i ≫ i') (g ≫ i ≫ i')]
[HasPullback ((f ≫ i) ≫ i') ((g ≫ i) ≫ i')] :
pullback.mapDesc f g (i ≫ i') = pullback.mapDesc f g i ≫ pullback.mapDesc _ _ i' ≫
(pullback.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.map_desc_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.mapDesc_comp
/-- If `f₁ = f₂` and `g₁ = g₂`, we may construct a canonical
isomorphism `pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pullback f₂ g₂` -/
@[simps! hom]
def pushout.congrHom {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂) (h₂ : g₁ = g₂)
[HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] : pushout f₁ g₁ ≅ pushout f₂ g₂ :=
asIso <| pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom
@[simp]
theorem pushout.congrHom_inv {X Y Z : C} {f₁ f₂ : X ⟶ Y} {g₁ g₂ : X ⟶ Z} (h₁ : f₁ = f₂)
(h₂ : g₁ = g₂) [HasPushout f₁ g₁] [HasPushout f₂ g₂] :
(pushout.congrHom h₁ h₂).inv =
pushout.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp [h₁]) (by simp [h₂]) := by
ext
· erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inl_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
· erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, Category.id_comp]
erw [pushout.inr_desc]
rw [Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.congr_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.congrHom_inv
theorem pushout.mapLift_comp {X Y S T S' : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (i : S ⟶ T) (i' : S' ⟶ S)
[HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (i ≫ f) (i ≫ g)] [HasPushout (i' ≫ i ≫ f) (i' ≫ i ≫ g)]
[HasPushout ((i' ≫ i) ≫ f) ((i' ≫ i) ≫ g)] :
pushout.mapLift f g (i' ≫ i) =
(pushout.congrHom (Category.assoc _ _ _) (Category.assoc _ _ _)).hom ≫
pushout.mapLift _ _ i' ≫ pushout.mapLift f g i := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.pushout.map_lift_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout.mapLift_comp
section
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
/-- The comparison morphism for the pullback of `f,g`.
This is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves the pullback of `f,g`; see
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean`
-/
def pullbackComparison (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
G.obj (pullback f g) ⟶ pullback (G.map f) (G.map g) :=
pullback.lift (G.map pullback.fst) (G.map pullback.snd)
(by simp only [← G.map_comp, pullback.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackComparison_comp_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pullbackComparison G f g ≫ pullback.fst = G.map pullback.fst :=
pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackComparison_comp_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pullbackComparison G f g ≫ pullback.snd = G.map pullback.snd :=
pullback.lift_snd _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_comparison_comp_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackComparison_comp_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_lift_pullbackComparison (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f g]
[HasPullback (G.map f) (G.map g)] {W : C} {h : W ⟶ X} {k : W ⟶ Y} (w : h ≫ f = k ≫ g) :
G.map (pullback.lift _ _ w) ≫ pullbackComparison G f g =
pullback.lift (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) := by
ext <;> simp [← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.map_lift_pullback_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.map_lift_pullbackComparison
/-- The comparison morphism for the pushout of `f,g`.
This is an isomorphism iff `G` preserves the pushout of `f,g`; see
`Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Preserves/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean`
-/
def pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] :
pushout (G.map f) (G.map g) ⟶ G.obj (pushout f g) :=
pushout.desc (G.map pushout.inl) (G.map pushout.inr)
(by simp only [← G.map_comp, pushout.condition])
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] : pushout.inl ≫ pushoutComparison G f g = G.map pushout.inl :=
pushout.inl_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_comp_pushoutComparison (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] : pushout.inr ≫ pushoutComparison G f g = G.map pushout.inr :=
pushout.inr_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inr_comp_pushout_comparison CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_comp_pushoutComparison
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pushoutComparison_map_desc (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [HasPushout f g]
[HasPushout (G.map f) (G.map g)] {W : C} {h : Y ⟶ W} {k : Z ⟶ W} (w : f ≫ h = g ≫ k) :
pushoutComparison G f g ≫ G.map (pushout.desc _ _ w) =
pushout.desc (G.map h) (G.map k) (by simp only [← G.map_comp, w]) := by
ext <;> simp [← G.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_comparison_map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutComparison_map_desc
end
section PullbackSymmetry
open WalkingCospan
variable (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
/-- Making this a global instance would make the typeclass search go in an infinite loop. -/
theorem hasPullback_symmetry [HasPullback f g] : HasPullback g f :=
⟨⟨⟨_, PullbackCone.flipIsLimit (pullbackIsPullback f g)⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_symmetry
attribute [local instance] hasPullback_symmetry
/-- The isomorphism `X ×[Z] Y ≅ Y ×[Z] X`. -/
def pullbackSymmetry [HasPullback f g] : pullback f g ≅ pullback g f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso
(PullbackCone.flipIsLimit (pullbackIsPullback f g)) (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd := by simp [pullbackSymmetry]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst := by simp [pullbackSymmetry]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_comp_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_fst [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_inv_comp_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_snd [HasPullback f g] :
(pullbackSymmetry f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst := by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_inv_comp_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_inv_comp_snd
end PullbackSymmetry
section PushoutSymmetry
open WalkingCospan
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z)
/-- Making this a global instance would make the typeclass search go in an infinite loop. -/
theorem hasPushout_symmetry [HasPushout f g] : HasPushout g f :=
⟨⟨⟨_, PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout f g)⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_symmetry
attribute [local instance] hasPushout_symmetry
/-- The isomorphism `Y ⨿[X] Z ≅ Z ⨿[X] Y`. -/
def pushoutSymmetry [HasPushout f g] : pushout f g ≅ pushout g f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso
(PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout f g)) (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutSymmetry
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).hom = pushout.inr :=
(colimit.isColimit (span f g)).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
(PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout g f)) _
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_symmetry_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).hom = pushout.inl :=
(colimit.isColimit (span f g)).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
(PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout g f)) _
#align category_theory.limits.inr_comp_pushout_symmetry_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).inv = pushout.inr := by simp [Iso.comp_inv_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.inl_comp_pushout_symmetry_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv [HasPushout f g] :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutSymmetry f g).inv = pushout.inl := by simp [Iso.comp_inv_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.inr_comp_pushout_symmetry_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_comp_pushoutSymmetry_inv
end PushoutSymmetry
section PullbackLeftIso
open WalkingCospan
/-- The pullback of `f, g` is also the pullback of `f ≫ i, g ≫ i` for any mono `i`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackIsPullbackOfCompMono (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) (i : W ⟶ Z) [Mono i]
[HasPullback f g] : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk pullback.fst pullback.snd
(show pullback.fst ≫ f ≫ i = pullback.snd ≫ g ≫ i from by -- Porting note: used to be _
simp only [← Category.assoc]; rw [cancel_mono]; apply pullback.condition)) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitOfCompMono f g i _ (limit.isLimit (cospan f g))
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_is_pullback_of_comp_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackIsPullbackOfCompMono
instance hasPullback_of_comp_mono (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) (i : W ⟶ Z) [Mono i] [HasPullback f g] :
HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackIsPullbackOfCompMono f g i⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_of_comp_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_of_comp_mono
variable (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f]
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Z` is iso, then `X ×[Z] Y ≅ Y`. This is the explicit limit cone. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIso : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (g ≫ inv f) (𝟙 _) <| by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftIso_x : (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g).pt = Y := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_X CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso_x
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftIso_fst : (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g).fst = g ≫ inv f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso_fst
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftIso_snd : (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g).snd = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso_snd
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftIso_π_app_none : (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g).π.app none = g := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_π_app_none CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso_π_app_none
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftIso_π_app_left : (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g).π.app left = g ≫ inv f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso_π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfLeftIso_π_app_right : (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g).π.app right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIso_π_app_right
/-- Verify that the constructed limit cone is indeed a limit. -/
def pullbackConeOfLeftIsoIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfLeftIso f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun s => ⟨s.snd, by simp [← s.condition_assoc]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_left_iso_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfLeftIsoIsLimit
theorem hasPullback_of_left_iso : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfLeftIsoIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_of_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_of_left_iso
attribute [local instance] hasPullback_of_left_iso
instance pullback_snd_iso_of_left_iso : IsIso (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.lift (g ≫ inv f) (𝟙 _) (by simp), ?_, by simp⟩⟩
ext
· simp [← pullback.condition_assoc]
· simp [pullback.condition_assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_left_iso
variable (i : Z ⟶ W) [Mono i]
instance hasPullback_of_right_factors_mono (f : X ⟶ Z) : HasPullback i (f ≫ i) := by
conv =>
congr
rw [← Category.id_comp i]
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_of_right_factors_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_of_right_factors_mono
instance pullback_snd_iso_of_right_factors_mono (f : X ⟶ Z) :
IsIso (pullback.snd : pullback i (f ≫ i) ⟶ _) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-testing 2024-04-01
this could not be placed directly in the `show from` without `dsimp` -/
have := limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackIsPullbackOfCompMono (𝟙 _) f i⟩ WalkingCospan.right
dsimp only [cospan_right, id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
Functor.const_obj_obj, cospan_one] at this
convert (congrArg IsIso (show _ ≫ pullback.snd = _ from this)).mp inferInstance
· exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
· exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_right_factors_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_right_factors_mono
end PullbackLeftIso
section PullbackRightIso
open WalkingCospan
variable (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g]
/-- If `g : Y ⟶ Z` is iso, then `X ×[Z] Y ≅ X`. This is the explicit limit cone. -/
def pullbackConeOfRightIso : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (𝟙 _) (f ≫ inv g) <| by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfRightIso_x : (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g).pt = X := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_X CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso_x
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfRightIso_fst : (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g).fst = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso_fst
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfRightIso_snd : (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g).snd = f ≫ inv g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso_snd
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simps
theorem pullbackConeOfRightIso_π_app_none : (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g).π.app none = f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_π_app_none CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso_π_app_none
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfRightIso_π_app_left : (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g).π.app left = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso_π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem pullbackConeOfRightIso_π_app_right : (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g).π.app right = f ≫ inv g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIso_π_app_right
/-- Verify that the constructed limit cone is indeed a limit. -/
def pullbackConeOfRightIsoIsLimit : IsLimit (pullbackConeOfRightIso f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ fun s => ⟨s.fst, by simp [s.condition_assoc]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_cone_of_right_iso_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackConeOfRightIsoIsLimit
theorem hasPullback_of_right_iso : HasPullback f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackConeOfRightIsoIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_of_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_of_right_iso
attribute [local instance] hasPullback_of_right_iso
instance pullback_snd_iso_of_right_iso : IsIso (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.lift (𝟙 _) (f ≫ inv g) (by simp), ?_, by simp⟩⟩
ext
· simp
· simp [pullback.condition_assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_right_iso
variable (i : Z ⟶ W) [Mono i]
instance hasPullback_of_left_factors_mono (f : X ⟶ Z) : HasPullback (f ≫ i) i := by
conv =>
congr
case g => rw [← Category.id_comp i]
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_of_left_factors_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_of_left_factors_mono
instance pullback_snd_iso_of_left_factors_mono (f : X ⟶ Z) :
IsIso (pullback.fst : pullback (f ≫ i) i ⟶ _) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-testing 2024-04-01
this could not be placed directly in the `show from` without `dsimp` -/
have := limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π ⟨_, pullbackIsPullbackOfCompMono f (𝟙 _) i⟩ WalkingCospan.left
dsimp only [cospan_left, id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
Functor.const_obj_obj, cospan_one] at this
convert (congrArg IsIso (show _ ≫ pullback.fst = _ from this)).mp inferInstance
· exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
· exact (Category.id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_left_factors_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_snd_iso_of_left_factors_mono
end PullbackRightIso
section PushoutLeftIso
open WalkingSpan
/-- The pushout of `f, g` is also the pullback of `h ≫ f, h ≫ g` for any epi `h`. -/
noncomputable def pushoutIsPushoutOfEpiComp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h]
[HasPushout f g] : IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk pushout.inl pushout.inr
(show (h ≫ f) ≫ pushout.inl = (h ≫ g) ≫ pushout.inr from by
simp only [Category.assoc]; rw [cancel_epi]; exact pushout.condition)) :=
PushoutCocone.isColimitOfEpiComp f g h _ (colimit.isColimit (span f g))
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_is_pushout_of_epi_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutIsPushoutOfEpiComp
instance hasPushout_of_epi_comp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h] [HasPushout f g] :
HasPushout (h ≫ f) (h ≫ g) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pushoutIsPushoutOfEpiComp f g h⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_of_epi_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_of_epi_comp
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [IsIso f]
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Y` is iso, then `Y ⨿[X] Z ≅ Z`. This is the explicit colimit cocone. -/
def pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso : PushoutCocone f g :=
PushoutCocone.mk (inv f ≫ g) (𝟙 _) <| by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_x : (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g).pt = Z := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_X CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_x
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_inl : (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g).inl = inv f ≫ g := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_inl
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_inr : (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g).inr = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_inr
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_ι_app_none : (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g).ι.app none = g := by
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_ι_app_none CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_ι_app_none
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_ι_app_left : (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g).ι.app left = inv f ≫ g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_ι_app_right : (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g).ι.app right = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso_ι_app_right
/-- Verify that the constructed cocone is indeed a colimit. -/
def pushoutCoconeOfLeftIsoIsLimit : IsColimit (pushoutCoconeOfLeftIso f g) :=
PushoutCocone.isColimitAux' _ fun s => ⟨s.inr, by simp [← s.condition]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_left_iso_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfLeftIsoIsLimit
theorem hasPushout_of_left_iso : HasPushout f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pushoutCoconeOfLeftIsoIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_of_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_of_left_iso
attribute [local instance] hasPushout_of_left_iso
instance pushout_inr_iso_of_left_iso : IsIso (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.desc (inv f ≫ g) (𝟙 _) (by simp), by simp, ?_⟩⟩
ext
· simp [← pushout.condition]
· simp [pushout.condition_assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_inr_iso_of_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout_inr_iso_of_left_iso
variable (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h]
instance hasPushout_of_right_factors_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) : HasPushout h (h ≫ f) := by
conv =>
congr
rw [← Category.comp_id h]
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_of_right_factors_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_of_right_factors_epi
instance pushout_inr_iso_of_right_factors_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout h (h ≫ f)) := by
convert (congrArg IsIso (show pushout.inr ≫ _ = _ from colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_inv
⟨_, pushoutIsPushoutOfEpiComp (𝟙 _) f h⟩ WalkingSpan.right)).mp
inferInstance
· apply (Category.comp_id _).symm
· apply (Category.comp_id _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_inr_iso_of_right_factors_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout_inr_iso_of_right_factors_epi
end PushoutLeftIso
section PushoutRightIso
open WalkingSpan
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [IsIso g]
/-- If `f : X ⟶ Z` is iso, then `Y ⨿[X] Z ≅ Y`. This is the explicit colimit cocone. -/
def pushoutCoconeOfRightIso : PushoutCocone f g :=
PushoutCocone.mk (𝟙 _) (inv g ≫ f) <| by simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_x : (pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g).pt = Y := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_X CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_x
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_inl : (pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g).inl = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_inl
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_inr : (pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g).inr = inv g ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_inr
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this; removed simp
theorem pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_ι_app_none : (pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g).ι.app none = f := by
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_ι_app_none CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_ι_app_none
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_ι_app_left : (pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g).ι.app left = 𝟙 _ := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_ι_app_right :
(pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g).ι.app right = inv g ≫ f := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIso_ι_app_right
/-- Verify that the constructed cocone is indeed a colimit. -/
def pushoutCoconeOfRightIsoIsLimit : IsColimit (pushoutCoconeOfRightIso f g) :=
PushoutCocone.isColimitAux' _ fun s => ⟨s.inl, by simp [← s.condition]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_cocone_of_right_iso_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutCoconeOfRightIsoIsLimit
theorem hasPushout_of_right_iso : HasPushout f g :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pushoutCoconeOfRightIsoIsLimit f g⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_of_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_of_right_iso
attribute [local instance] hasPushout_of_right_iso
instance pushout_inl_iso_of_right_iso : IsIso (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f g) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.desc (𝟙 _) (inv g ≫ f) (by simp), by simp, ?_⟩⟩
ext
· simp [← pushout.condition]
· simp [pushout.condition]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_inl_iso_of_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout_inl_iso_of_right_iso
variable (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h]
instance hasPushout_of_left_factors_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) : HasPushout (h ≫ f) h := by
conv =>
congr
case g => rw [← Category.comp_id h]
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_of_left_factors_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_of_left_factors_epi
instance pushout_inl_iso_of_left_factors_epi (f : X ⟶ Y) :
IsIso (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout (h ≫ f) h) := by
convert (congrArg IsIso (show pushout.inl ≫ _ = _ from colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_inv
⟨_, pushoutIsPushoutOfEpiComp f (𝟙 _) h⟩ WalkingSpan.left)).mp
inferInstance;
· exact (Category.comp_id _).symm
· exact (Category.comp_id _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_inl_iso_of_left_factors_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.pushout_inl_iso_of_left_factors_epi
end PushoutRightIso
section
open WalkingCospan
variable (f : X ⟶ Y)
instance has_kernel_pair_of_mono [Mono f] : HasPullback f f :=
⟨⟨⟨_, PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId f⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_kernel_pair_of_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.has_kernel_pair_of_mono
theorem fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq [Mono f] : (pullback.fst : pullback f f ⟶ _) = pullback.snd :=
((PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId f).fac (getLimitCone (cospan f f)).cone left).symm.trans
((PullbackCone.isLimitMkIdId f).fac (getLimitCone (cospan f f)).cone right : _)
#align category_theory.limits.fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq
@[simp]
theorem pullbackSymmetry_hom_of_mono_eq [Mono f] : (pullbackSymmetry f f).hom = 𝟙 _ := by
ext
· simp [fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq]
· simp [fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_of_mono_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackSymmetry_hom_of_mono_eq
instance fst_iso_of_mono_eq [Mono f] : IsIso (pullback.fst : pullback f f ⟶ _) := by
refine ⟨⟨pullback.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp), ?_, by simp⟩⟩
ext
· simp
· simp [fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.fst_iso_of_mono_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.fst_iso_of_mono_eq
instance snd_iso_of_mono_eq [Mono f] : IsIso (pullback.snd : pullback f f ⟶ _) := by
rw [← fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq]
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.snd_iso_of_mono_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.snd_iso_of_mono_eq
end
section
open WalkingSpan
variable (f : X ⟶ Y)
instance has_cokernel_pair_of_epi [Epi f] : HasPushout f f :=
⟨⟨⟨_, PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId f⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_cokernel_pair_of_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.has_cokernel_pair_of_epi
theorem inl_eq_inr_of_epi_eq [Epi f] : (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f f) = pushout.inr :=
((PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId f).fac (getColimitCocone (span f f)).cocone left).symm.trans
((PushoutCocone.isColimitMkIdId f).fac (getColimitCocone (span f f)).cocone right : _)
#align category_theory.limits.inl_eq_inr_of_epi_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_eq_inr_of_epi_eq
@[simp]
theorem pullback_symmetry_hom_of_epi_eq [Epi f] : (pushoutSymmetry f f).hom = 𝟙 _ := by
ext <;> simp [inl_eq_inr_of_epi_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_of_epi_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_symmetry_hom_of_epi_eq
instance inl_iso_of_epi_eq [Epi f] : IsIso (pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout f f) := by
refine ⟨⟨pushout.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp), by simp, ?_⟩⟩
apply pushout.hom_ext
· simp
· simp [inl_eq_inr_of_epi_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.inl_iso_of_epi_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_iso_of_epi_eq
instance inr_iso_of_epi_eq [Epi f] : IsIso (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f f) := by
rw [← inl_eq_inr_of_epi_eq]
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.inr_iso_of_epi_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_iso_of_epi_eq
end
section PasteLemma
variable {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ X₃) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Y₃)
variable (i₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (i₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (i₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃)
variable (h₁ : i₁ ≫ g₁ = f₁ ≫ i₂) (h₂ : i₂ ≫ g₂ = f₂ ≫ i₃)
/-- Given
X₁ - f₁ -> X₂ - f₂ -> X₃
| | |
i₁ i₂ i₃
∨ ∨ ∨
Y₁ - g₁ -> Y₂ - g₂ -> Y₃
Then the big square is a pullback if both the small squares are.
-/
def bigSquareIsPullback (H : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk _ _ h₂))
(H' : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk _ _ h₁)) :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show i₁ ≫ g₁ ≫ g₂ = (f₁ ≫ f₂) ≫ i₃ by
rw [← Category.assoc, h₁, Category.assoc, h₂, Category.assoc])) := by
fapply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
have : (s.fst ≫ g₁) ≫ g₂ = s.snd ≫ i₃ := by rw [← s.condition, Category.assoc]
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' H (s.fst ≫ g₁) s.snd this with ⟨l₁, hl₁, hl₁'⟩
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' H' s.fst l₁ hl₁.symm with ⟨l₂, hl₂, hl₂'⟩
use l₂
use hl₂
use
show l₂ ≫ f₁ ≫ f₂ = s.snd by
rw [← hl₁', ← hl₂', Category.assoc]
rfl
intro m hm₁ hm₂
apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H'
· erw [hm₁, hl₂]
· apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H
· erw [Category.assoc, ← h₁, ← Category.assoc, hm₁, ← hl₂, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, h₁]
rfl
· erw [Category.assoc, hm₂, ← hl₁', ← hl₂']
#align category_theory.limits.big_square_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.bigSquareIsPullback
/-- Given
X₁ - f₁ -> X₂ - f₂ -> X₃
| | |
i₁ i₂ i₃
∨ ∨ ∨
Y₁ - g₁ -> Y₂ - g₂ -> Y₃
Then the big square is a pushout if both the small squares are.
-/
def bigSquareIsPushout (H : IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ h₂))
(H' : IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ h₁)) :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk _ _
(show i₁ ≫ g₁ ≫ g₂ = (f₁ ≫ f₂) ≫ i₃ by
rw [← Category.assoc, h₁, Category.assoc, h₂, Category.assoc])) := by
fapply PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
intro s
have : i₁ ≫ s.inl = f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ s.inr := by rw [s.condition, Category.assoc]
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' H' s.inl (f₂ ≫ s.inr) this with ⟨l₁, hl₁, hl₁'⟩
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' H l₁ s.inr hl₁' with ⟨l₂, hl₂, hl₂'⟩
use l₂
use
show (g₁ ≫ g₂) ≫ l₂ = s.inl by
rw [← hl₁, ← hl₂, Category.assoc]
rfl
use hl₂'
intro m hm₁ hm₂
apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H
· apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H'
· erw [← Category.assoc, hm₁, hl₂, hl₁]
· erw [← Category.assoc, h₂, Category.assoc, hm₂, ← hl₂', ← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc, ←
h₂]
rfl
· erw [hm₂, hl₂']
#align category_theory.limits.big_square_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.bigSquareIsPushout
/-- Given
X₁ - f₁ -> X₂ - f₂ -> X₃
| | |
i₁ i₂ i₃
∨ ∨ ∨
Y₁ - g₁ -> Y₂ - g₂ -> Y₃
Then the left square is a pullback if the right square and the big square are.
-/
def leftSquareIsPullback (H : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk _ _ h₂))
(H' :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk _ _
(show i₁ ≫ g₁ ≫ g₂ = (f₁ ≫ f₂) ≫ i₃ by
rw [← Category.assoc, h₁, Category.assoc, h₂, Category.assoc]))) :
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk _ _ h₁) := by
fapply PullbackCone.isLimitAux'
intro s
have : s.fst ≫ g₁ ≫ g₂ = (s.snd ≫ f₂) ≫ i₃ := by
rw [← Category.assoc, s.condition, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, h₂]
rcases PullbackCone.IsLimit.lift' H' s.fst (s.snd ≫ f₂) this with ⟨l₁, hl₁, hl₁'⟩
use l₁
use hl₁
constructor
· apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H
· erw [Category.assoc, ← h₁, ← Category.assoc, hl₁, s.condition]
rfl
· erw [Category.assoc, hl₁']
rfl
· intro m hm₁ hm₂
apply PullbackCone.IsLimit.hom_ext H'
· erw [hm₁, hl₁]
· erw [hl₁', ← hm₂]
exact (Category.assoc _ _ _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.left_square_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.leftSquareIsPullback
/-- Given
X₁ - f₁ -> X₂ - f₂ -> X₃
| | |
i₁ i₂ i₃
∨ ∨ ∨
Y₁ - g₁ -> Y₂ - g₂ -> Y₃
Then the right square is a pushout if the left square and the big square are.
-/
def rightSquareIsPushout (H : IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ h₁))
(H' :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk _ _
(show i₁ ≫ g₁ ≫ g₂ = (f₁ ≫ f₂) ≫ i₃ by
rw [← Category.assoc, h₁, Category.assoc, h₂, Category.assoc]))) :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk _ _ h₂) := by
fapply PushoutCocone.isColimitAux'
intro s
have : i₁ ≫ g₁ ≫ s.inl = (f₁ ≫ f₂) ≫ s.inr := by
rw [Category.assoc, ← s.condition, ← Category.assoc, ← Category.assoc, h₁]
rcases PushoutCocone.IsColimit.desc' H' (g₁ ≫ s.inl) s.inr this with ⟨l₁, hl₁, hl₁'⟩
dsimp at *
use l₁
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H
· erw [← Category.assoc, hl₁]
rfl
· erw [← Category.assoc, h₂, Category.assoc, hl₁', s.condition]
· exact hl₁'
· intro m hm₁ hm₂
apply PushoutCocone.IsColimit.hom_ext H'
· erw [hl₁, Category.assoc, hm₁]
· erw [hm₂, hl₁']
#align category_theory.limits.right_square_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.rightSquareIsPushout
end PasteLemma
section
variable (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (f' : W ⟶ X)
variable [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback f' (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _)]
variable [HasPullback (f' ≫ f) g]
/-- The canonical isomorphism `W ×[X] (X ×[Z] Y) ≅ W ×[Z] Y` -/
noncomputable def pullbackRightPullbackFstIso :
pullback f' (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) ≅ pullback (f' ≫ f) g := by
let this :=
bigSquareIsPullback (pullback.snd : pullback f' (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) ⟶ _)
pullback.snd f' f pullback.fst pullback.fst g pullback.condition pullback.condition
(pullbackIsPullback _ _) (pullbackIsPullback _ _)
exact (this.conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackIsPullback _ _) : _)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_right_pullback_fst_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackRightPullbackFstIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst :
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso f g f').hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_right_pullback_fst_iso_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_snd :
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso f g f').hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_right_pullback_fst_iso_hom_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_fst :
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso f g f').inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.left
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_right_pullback_fst_iso_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_snd :
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso f g f').inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.right
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_right_pullback_fst_iso_inv_snd_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst :
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso f g f').inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ f' := by
rw [← pullback.condition]
exact pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_fst_assoc _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_right_pullback_fst_iso_inv_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst
end
section
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) (g' : Z ⟶ W)
variable [HasPushout f g] [HasPushout (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) g']
variable [HasPushout f (g ≫ g')]
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(Y ⨿[X] Z) ⨿[Z] W ≅ Y ×[X] W` -/
noncomputable def pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso :
pushout (pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout f g) g' ≅ pushout f (g ≫ g') :=
((bigSquareIsPushout g g' _ _ f _ _ pushout.condition pushout.condition (pushoutIsPushout _ _)
(pushoutIsPushout _ _)).coconePointUniqueUpToIso
(pushoutIsPushout _ _) :
_)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_left_pushout_inr_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_inv :
pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso f g g').inv = pushout.inl ≫ pushout.inl :=
((bigSquareIsPushout g g' _ _ f _ _ pushout.condition pushout.condition (pushoutIsPushout _ _)
(pushoutIsPushout _ _)).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv
(pushoutIsPushout _ _) WalkingSpan.left :
_)
#align category_theory.limits.inl_pushout_left_pushout_inr_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso f g g').hom = pushout.inr :=
((bigSquareIsPushout g g' _ _ f _ _ pushout.condition pushout.condition (pushoutIsPushout _ _)
(pushoutIsPushout _ _)).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
(pushoutIsPushout _ _) WalkingSpan.right :
_)
#align category_theory.limits.inr_pushout_left_pushout_inr_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_inv :
pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso f g g').inv = pushout.inr := by
rw [Iso.comp_inv_eq, inr_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom]
#align category_theory.limits.inr_pushout_left_pushout_inr_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom :
pushout.inl ≫ pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso f g g').hom = pushout.inl := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Iso.eq_comp_inv, inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_inv]
#align category_theory.limits.inl_inl_pushout_left_pushout_inr_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom :
pushout.inr ≫ pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso f g g').hom = g' ≫ pushout.inr := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← Iso.eq_comp_inv, Category.assoc, inr_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_inv,
pushout.condition]
#align category_theory.limits.inr_inl_pushout_left_pushout_inr_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_inl_pushoutLeftPushoutInrIso_hom
end
section PullbackAssoc
/-
The objects and morphisms are as follows:
Z₂ - g₄ -> X₃
| |
g₃ f₄
∨ ∨
Z₁ - g₂ -> X₂ - f₃ -> Y₂
| |
g₁ f₂
∨ ∨
X₁ - f₁ -> Y₁
where the two squares are pullbacks.
We can then construct the pullback squares
W - l₂ -> Z₂ - g₄ -> X₃
| |
l₁ f₄
∨ ∨
Z₁ - g₂ -> X₂ - f₃ -> Y₂
and
W' - l₂' -> Z₂
| |
l₁' g₃
∨ ∨
Z₁ X₂
| |
g₁ f₂
∨ ∨
X₁ - f₁ -> Y₁
We will show that both `W` and `W'` are pullbacks over `g₁, g₂`, and thus we may construct a
canonical isomorphism between them. -/
variable {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₁) (f₃ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂)
variable (f₄ : X₃ ⟶ Y₂) [HasPullback f₁ f₂] [HasPullback f₃ f₄]
local notation "Z₁" => pullback f₁ f₂
local notation "Z₂" => pullback f₃ f₄
local notation "g₁" => (pullback.fst : Z₁ ⟶ X₁)
local notation "g₂" => (pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂)
local notation "g₃" => (pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂)
local notation "g₄" => (pullback.snd : Z₂ ⟶ X₃)
local notation "W" => pullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄
local notation "W'" => pullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂)
local notation "l₁" => (pullback.fst : W ⟶ Z₁)
local notation "l₂" =>
(pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ g₂) pullback.snd
(Eq.trans (Category.assoc _ _ _) pullback.condition) :
W ⟶ Z₂)
local notation "l₁'" =>
(pullback.lift pullback.fst (pullback.snd ≫ g₃)
(pullback.condition.trans (Eq.symm (Category.assoc _ _ _))) :
W' ⟶ Z₁)
local notation "l₂'" => (pullback.snd : W' ⟶ Z₂)
/-- `(X₁ ×[Y₁] X₂) ×[Y₂] X₃` is the pullback `(X₁ ×[Y₁] X₂) ×[X₂] (X₂ ×[Y₂] X₃)`. -/
def pullbackPullbackLeftIsPullback [HasPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄] : IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk l₁ l₂
(show l₁ ≫ g₂ = l₂ ≫ g₃ from (pullback.lift_fst _ _ _).symm)) := by
apply leftSquareIsPullback
· exact pullbackIsPullback f₃ f₄
convert pullbackIsPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄
rw [pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_pullback_left_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackPullbackLeftIsPullback
/-- `(X₁ ×[Y₁] X₂) ×[Y₂] X₃` is the pullback `X₁ ×[Y₁] (X₂ ×[Y₂] X₃)`. -/
def pullbackAssocIsPullback [HasPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄] :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk (l₁ ≫ g₁) l₂
(show (l₁ ≫ g₁) ≫ f₁ = l₂ ≫ g₃ ≫ f₂ by
rw [pullback.lift_fst_assoc, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, pullback.condition])) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply bigSquareIsPullback
· apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
exact pullbackIsPullback f₁ f₂
· apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply pullbackPullbackLeftIsPullback
· exact pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
· exact pullback.condition.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssocIsPullback
theorem hasPullback_assoc [HasPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄] : HasPullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackAssocIsPullback f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_assoc
/-- `X₁ ×[Y₁] (X₂ ×[Y₂] X₃)` is the pullback `(X₁ ×[Y₁] X₂) ×[X₂] (X₂ ×[Y₂] X₃)`. -/
def pullbackPullbackRightIsPullback [HasPullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂)] :
IsLimit (PullbackCone.mk l₁' l₂' (show l₁' ≫ g₂ = l₂' ≫ g₃ from pullback.lift_snd _ _ _)) := by
apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
apply leftSquareIsPullback
· apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
exact pullbackIsPullback f₁ f₂
· apply PullbackCone.isLimitOfFlip
exact IsLimit.ofIsoLimit (pullbackIsPullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂))
(PullbackCone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp))
· exact pullback.condition.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_pullback_right_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackPullbackRightIsPullback
/-- `X₁ ×[Y₁] (X₂ ×[Y₂] X₃)` is the pullback `(X₁ ×[Y₁] X₂) ×[Y₂] X₃`. -/
def pullbackAssocSymmIsPullback [HasPullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂)] :
IsLimit
(PullbackCone.mk l₁' (l₂' ≫ g₄)
(show l₁' ≫ g₂ ≫ f₃ = (l₂' ≫ g₄) ≫ f₄ by
rw [pullback.lift_snd_assoc, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, pullback.condition])) := by
apply bigSquareIsPullback
· exact pullbackIsPullback f₃ f₄
· apply pullbackPullbackRightIsPullback
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_symm_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssocSymmIsPullback
theorem hasPullback_assoc_symm [HasPullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂)] : HasPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄ :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pullbackAssocSymmIsPullback f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pullback_assoc_symm CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPullback_assoc_symm
/- Porting note: these don't seem to be propagating change from
-- variable [HasPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄] [HasPullback f₁ (g₃ ≫ f₂)] -/
variable [HasPullback (g₂ ≫ f₃) f₄] [HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)]
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(X₁ ×[Y₁] X₂) ×[Y₂] X₃ ≅ X₁ ×[Y₁] (X₂ ×[Y₂] X₃)`. -/
noncomputable def pullbackAssoc [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] :
pullback (pullback.snd ≫ f₃ : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _) f₄ ≅
pullback f₁ (pullback.fst ≫ f₂ : pullback f₃ f₄ ⟶ _) :=
(pullbackPullbackLeftIsPullback f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).conePointUniqueUpToIso
(pullbackPullbackRightIsPullback f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_fst [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] :
(pullbackAssoc f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).inv ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst := by
trans l₁' ≫ pullback.fst
· rw [← Category.assoc]
congr 1
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.left
· exact pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_inv_fst_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackAssoc_hom_fst [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] :
(pullbackAssoc f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_fst]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_fst [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] : (pullbackAssoc f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).hom ≫
pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
trans l₂ ≫ pullback.fst
· rw [← Category.assoc]
congr 1
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.right
· exact pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_hom_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_snd [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] :
(pullbackAssoc f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).hom ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd := by
trans l₂ ≫ pullback.snd
· rw [← Category.assoc]
congr 1
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ WalkingCospan.right
· exact pullback.lift_snd _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_hom_snd_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_snd [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] :
(pullbackAssoc f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).inv ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd =
pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst := by rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_fst]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_inv_fst_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackAssoc_inv_snd [HasPullback ((pullback.snd : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₃) f₄]
[HasPullback f₁ ((pullback.fst : Z₂ ⟶ X₂) ≫ f₂)] :
(pullbackAssoc f₁ f₂ f₃ f₄).inv ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_snd]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_assoc_inv_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackAssoc_inv_snd
end PullbackAssoc
section PushoutAssoc
/-
The objects and morphisms are as follows:
Z₂ - g₄ -> X₃
| |
g₃ f₄
∨ ∨
Z₁ - g₂ -> X₂ - f₃ -> Y₂
| |
g₁ f₂
∨ ∨
X₁ - f₁ -> Y₁
where the two squares are pushouts.
We can then construct the pushout squares
Z₁ - g₂ -> X₂ - f₃ -> Y₂
| |
g₁ l₂
∨ ∨
X₁ - f₁ -> Y₁ - l₁ -> W
and
Z₂ - g₄ -> X₃
| |
g₃ f₄
∨ ∨
X₂ Y₂
| |
f₂ l₂'
∨ ∨
Y₁ - l₁' -> W'
We will show that both `W` and `W'` are pushouts over `f₂, f₃`, and thus we may construct a
canonical isomorphism between them. -/
variable {X₁ X₂ X₃ Z₁ Z₂ : C} (g₁ : Z₁ ⟶ X₁) (g₂ : Z₁ ⟶ X₂) (g₃ : Z₂ ⟶ X₂)
variable (g₄ : Z₂ ⟶ X₃) [HasPushout g₁ g₂] [HasPushout g₃ g₄]
local notation "Y₁" => pushout g₁ g₂
local notation "Y₂" => pushout g₃ g₄
local notation "f₁" => (pushout.inl : X₁ ⟶ Y₁)
local notation "f₂" => (pushout.inr : X₂ ⟶ Y₁)
local notation "f₃" => (pushout.inl : X₂ ⟶ Y₂)
local notation "f₄" => (pushout.inr : X₃ ⟶ Y₂)
local notation "W" => pushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃)
local notation "W'" => pushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄
local notation "l₁" =>
(pushout.desc pushout.inl (f₃ ≫ pushout.inr) (pushout.condition.trans (Category.assoc _ _ _)) :
Y₁ ⟶ W)
local notation "l₂" => (pushout.inr : Y₂ ⟶ W)
local notation "l₁'" => (pushout.inl : Y₁ ⟶ W')
local notation "l₂'" =>
(pushout.desc (f₂ ≫ pushout.inl) pushout.inr
(Eq.trans (Eq.symm (Category.assoc _ _ _)) pushout.condition) :
Y₂ ⟶ W')
/-- `(X₁ ⨿[Z₁] X₂) ⨿[Z₂] X₃` is the pushout `(X₁ ⨿[Z₁] X₂) ×[X₂] (X₂ ⨿[Z₂] X₃)`. -/
def pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄] :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk l₁' l₂' (show f₂ ≫ l₁' = f₃ ≫ l₂' from (pushout.inl_desc _ _ _).symm)) := by
apply PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
apply rightSquareIsPushout
· apply PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
exact pushoutIsPushout g₃ g₄
· exact IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (PushoutCocone.flipIsColimit (pushoutIsPushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄))
(PushoutCocone.ext (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp))
· exact pushout.condition.symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_pushout_left_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout
/-- `(X₁ ⨿[Z₁] X₂) ⨿[Z₂] X₃` is the pushout `X₁ ⨿[Z₁] (X₂ ⨿[Z₂] X₃)`. -/
def pushoutAssocIsPushout [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄] :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk (f₁ ≫ l₁') l₂'
(show g₁ ≫ f₁ ≫ l₁' = (g₂ ≫ f₃) ≫ l₂' by
rw [Category.assoc, pushout.inl_desc, pushout.condition_assoc])) := by
apply bigSquareIsPushout
· apply pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout
· exact pushoutIsPushout _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_assoc_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutAssocIsPushout
theorem hasPushout_assoc [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄] : HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃) :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pushoutAssocIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_assoc
/-- `X₁ ⨿[Z₁] (X₂ ⨿[Z₂] X₃)` is the pushout `(X₁ ⨿[Z₁] X₂) ×[X₂] (X₂ ⨿[Z₂] X₃)`. -/
def pushoutPushoutRightIsPushout [HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃)] :
IsColimit (PushoutCocone.mk l₁ l₂ (show f₂ ≫ l₁ = f₃ ≫ l₂ from pushout.inr_desc _ _ _)) := by
apply rightSquareIsPushout
· exact pushoutIsPushout _ _
· convert pushoutIsPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃)
rw [pushout.inl_desc]
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_pushout_right_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutPushoutRightIsPushout
/-- `X₁ ⨿[Z₁] (X₂ ⨿[Z₂] X₃)` is the pushout `(X₁ ⨿[Z₁] X₂) ⨿[Z₂] X₃`. -/
def pushoutAssocSymmIsPushout [HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃)] :
IsColimit
(PushoutCocone.mk l₁ (f₄ ≫ l₂)
(show (g₃ ≫ f₂) ≫ l₁ = g₄ ≫ f₄ ≫ l₂ by
rw [Category.assoc, pushout.inr_desc, pushout.condition_assoc])) := by
apply PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
apply bigSquareIsPushout
· apply PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
apply pushoutPushoutRightIsPushout
· apply PushoutCocone.isColimitOfFlip
exact pushoutIsPushout g₃ g₄
· exact pushout.condition.symm
· exact (pushout.inr_desc _ _ _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_assoc_symm_is_pushout CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutAssocSymmIsPushout
theorem hasPushout_assoc_symm [HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃)] : HasPushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄ :=
⟨⟨⟨_, pushoutAssocSymmIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_pushout_assoc_symm CategoryTheory.Limits.hasPushout_assoc_symm
-- Porting note: these are not propagating so moved into statements
-- variable [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ f₂) g₄] [HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ f₃)]
/-- The canonical isomorphism `(X₁ ⨿[Z₁] X₂) ⨿[Z₂] X₃ ≅ X₁ ⨿[Z₁] (X₂ ⨿[Z₂] X₃)`. -/
noncomputable def pushoutAssoc [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ (pushout.inr : X₂ ⟶ Y₁)) g₄]
[HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ (pushout.inl : X₂ ⟶ Y₂))] :
pushout (g₃ ≫ pushout.inr : _ ⟶ pushout g₁ g₂) g₄ ≅
pushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ pushout.inl : _ ⟶ pushout g₃ g₄) :=
(pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).coconePointUniqueUpToIso
(pushoutPushoutRightIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄)
#align category_theory.limits.pushout_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.pushoutAssoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inl_inl_pushoutAssoc_hom [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ (pushout.inr : X₂ ⟶ Y₁)) g₄]
[HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ (pushout.inl : X₂ ⟶ Y₂))] :
pushout.inl ≫ pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutAssoc g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).hom = pushout.inl := by
trans f₁ ≫ l₁
· congr 1
exact
(pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _
WalkingCospan.left
· exact pushout.inl_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inl_inl_pushout_assoc_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inl_inl_pushoutAssoc_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inr_inl_pushoutAssoc_hom [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ (pushout.inr : X₂ ⟶ Y₁)) g₄]
[HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ (pushout.inl : X₂ ⟶ Y₂))] :
pushout.inr ≫ pushout.inl ≫ (pushoutAssoc g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).hom = pushout.inl ≫ pushout.inr := by
trans f₂ ≫ l₁
· congr 1
exact
(pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _
WalkingCospan.left
· exact pushout.inr_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.inr_inl_pushout_assoc_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.inr_inl_pushoutAssoc_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Pullbacks.lean | 2,644 | 2,652 | theorem inr_inr_pushoutAssoc_inv [HasPushout (g₃ ≫ (pushout.inr : X₂ ⟶ Y₁)) g₄]
[HasPushout g₁ (g₂ ≫ (pushout.inl : X₂ ⟶ Y₂))] :
pushout.inr ≫ pushout.inr ≫ (pushoutAssoc g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).inv = pushout.inr := by |
trans f₄ ≫ l₂'
· congr 1
exact
(pushoutPushoutLeftIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄).comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv
(pushoutPushoutRightIsPushout g₁ g₂ g₃ g₄) WalkingCospan.right
· exact pushout.inr_desc _ _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We prove basic results about univariate polynomials.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {p q : R[X]}
section
variable [Semiring S]
theorem natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S}
(hz : aeval z p = 0) (inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.natDegree :=
natDegree_pos_of_eval₂_root hp (algebraMap R S) hz inj
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pos_of_aeval_root Polynomial.natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root
theorem degree_pos_of_aeval_root [Algebra R S] {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {z : S} (hz : aeval z p = 0)
(inj : ∀ x : R, algebraMap R S x = 0 → x = 0) : 0 < p.degree :=
natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos.mp (natDegree_pos_of_aeval_root hp hz inj)
#align polynomial.degree_pos_of_aeval_root Polynomial.degree_pos_of_aeval_root
theorem modByMonic_eq_of_dvd_sub (hq : q.Monic) {p₁ p₂ : R[X]} (h : q ∣ p₁ - p₂) :
p₁ %ₘ q = p₂ %ₘ q := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨f, sub_eq⟩ := h
refine (div_modByMonic_unique (p₂ /ₘ q + f) _ hq ⟨?_, degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq⟩).2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mp sub_eq, mul_add, ← add_assoc, modByMonic_add_div _ hq, add_comm]
#align polynomial.mod_by_monic_eq_of_dvd_sub Polynomial.modByMonic_eq_of_dvd_sub
theorem add_modByMonic (p₁ p₂ : R[X]) : (p₁ + p₂) %ₘ q = p₁ %ₘ q + p₂ %ₘ q := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· cases' subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (p₁ /ₘ q + p₂ /ₘ q) _ hq
⟨by
rw [mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, modByMonic_add_div _ hq, ← add_assoc,
add_comm (q * _), modByMonic_add_div _ hq],
(degree_add_le _ _).trans_lt
(max_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq) (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq))⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
#align polynomial.add_mod_by_monic Polynomial.add_modByMonic
theorem smul_modByMonic (c : R) (p : R[X]) : c • p %ₘ q = c • (p %ₘ q) := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· cases' subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (c • (p /ₘ q)) (c • (p %ₘ q)) hq
⟨by rw [mul_smul_comm, ← smul_add, modByMonic_add_div p hq],
(degree_smul_le _ _).trans_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq)⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
#align polynomial.smul_mod_by_monic Polynomial.smul_modByMonic
/-- `_ %ₘ q` as an `R`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def modByMonicHom (q : R[X]) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p %ₘ q
map_add' := add_modByMonic
map_smul' := smul_modByMonic
#align polynomial.mod_by_monic_hom Polynomial.modByMonicHom
theorem neg_modByMonic (p mod : R[X]) : (-p) %ₘ mod = - (p %ₘ mod) :=
(modByMonicHom mod).map_neg p
theorem sub_modByMonic (a b mod : R[X]) : (a - b) %ₘ mod = a %ₘ mod - b %ₘ mod :=
(modByMonicHom mod).map_sub a b
end
section
variable [Ring S]
theorem aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root [Algebra R S] {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.Monic) {x : S}
(hx : aeval x q = 0) : aeval x (p %ₘ q) = aeval x p := by
--`eval₂_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root` doesn't work here as it needs commutativity
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq, _root_.map_sub, _root_.map_mul, hx, zero_mul,
sub_zero]
#align polynomial.aeval_mod_by_monic_eq_self_of_root Polynomial.aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root
end
end CommRing
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [Semiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
instance : NoZeroDivisors R[X] where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h := by
rw [← leadingCoeff_eq_zero, ← leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero ?_
rw [← leadingCoeff_zero, ← leadingCoeff_mul, h]
theorem natDegree_mul (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : q ≠ 0) : (p*q).natDegree = p.natDegree + q.natDegree := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree (mul_ne_zero hp hq),
Nat.cast_add, ← degree_eq_natDegree hp, ← degree_eq_natDegree hq, degree_mul]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_mul Polynomial.natDegree_mul
theorem trailingDegree_mul : (p * q).trailingDegree = p.trailingDegree + q.trailingDegree := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, zero_mul, trailingDegree_zero, top_add]
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq, mul_zero, trailingDegree_zero, add_top]
· rw [trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hp, trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree hq,
trailingDegree_eq_natTrailingDegree (mul_ne_zero hp hq), natTrailingDegree_mul hp hq]
apply WithTop.coe_add
#align polynomial.trailing_degree_mul Polynomial.trailingDegree_mul
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : natDegree (p ^ n) = n * natDegree p := by
classical
obtain rfl | hp := eq_or_ne p 0
· obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0 <;> simp [*]
exact natDegree_pow' $ by
rw [← leadingCoeff_pow, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]; exact pow_ne_zero _ hp
#align polynomial.nat_degree_pow Polynomial.natDegree_pow
theorem degree_le_mul_left (p : R[X]) (hq : q ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree (p * q) := by
classical
exact if hp : p = 0 then by simp only [hp, zero_mul, le_refl]
else by
rw [degree_mul, degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq];
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align polynomial.degree_le_mul_left Polynomial.degree_le_mul_left
theorem natDegree_le_of_dvd {p q : R[X]} (h1 : p ∣ q) (h2 : q ≠ 0) : p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree := by
rcases h1 with ⟨q, rfl⟩; rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at h2
rw [natDegree_mul h2.1 h2.2]; exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_of_dvd Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_dvd
theorem degree_le_of_dvd {p q : R[X]} (h1 : p ∣ q) (h2 : q ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
rcases h1 with ⟨q, rfl⟩; rw [mul_ne_zero_iff] at h2
exact degree_le_mul_left p h2.2
#align polynomial.degree_le_of_dvd Polynomial.degree_le_of_dvd
theorem eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt {p q : R[X]} (h₁ : p ∣ q) (h₂ : degree q < degree p) :
q = 0 := by
by_contra hc
exact (lt_iff_not_ge _ _).mp h₂ (degree_le_of_dvd h₁ hc)
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt Polynomial.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_degree_lt
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/RingDivision.lean | 172 | 175 | theorem eq_zero_of_dvd_of_natDegree_lt {p q : R[X]} (h₁ : p ∣ q) (h₂ : natDegree q < natDegree p) :
q = 0 := by |
by_contra hc
exact (lt_iff_not_ge _ _).mp h₂ (natDegree_le_of_dvd h₁ hc)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fec1d95fc61c750c1ddbb5b1f7f48b8e811a80d7"
/-!
# Binary (co)products
We define a category `WalkingPair`, which is the index category
for a binary (co)product diagram. A convenience method `pair X Y`
constructs the functor from the walking pair, hitting the given objects.
We define `prod X Y` and `coprod X Y` as limits and colimits of such functors.
Typeclasses `HasBinaryProducts` and `HasBinaryCoproducts` assert the existence
of (co)limits shaped as walking pairs.
We include lemmas for simplifying equations involving projections and coprojections, and define
braiding and associating isomorphisms, and the product comparison morphism.
## References
* [Stacks: Products of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001R)
* [Stacks: coproducts of pairs](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04AN)
-/
noncomputable section
universe v u u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
/-- The type of objects for the diagram indexing a binary (co)product. -/
inductive WalkingPair : Type
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair
open WalkingPair
/-- The equivalence swapping left and right.
-/
def WalkingPair.swap : WalkingPair ≃ WalkingPair where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
invFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_left : WalkingPair.swap left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_right : WalkingPair.swap right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt : WalkingPair.swap.symm left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff : WalkingPair.swap.symm right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff
/-- An equivalence from `WalkingPair` to `Bool`, sometimes useful when reindexing limits.
-/
def WalkingPair.equivBool : WalkingPair ≃ Bool where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j true false
-- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
invFun b := Bool.recOn b right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv b := by cases b; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left : WalkingPair.equivBool left = true :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right : WalkingPair.equivBool right = false :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm true = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm false = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false
variable {C : Type u}
/-- The function on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pairFunction (X Y : C) : WalkingPair → C := fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_left (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_left
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_right (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y right = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_right
variable [Category.{v} C]
/-- The diagram on the walking pair, sending the two points to `X` and `Y`. -/
def pair (X Y : C) : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C :=
Discrete.functor fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair CategoryTheory.Limits.pair
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨left⟩ = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_left
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨right⟩ = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_right
section
variable {F G : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨left⟩)
(g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨right⟩)
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
/-- The natural transformation between two functors out of the
walking pair, specified by its components. -/
def mapPair : F ⟶ G where
app j := Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
naturality := fun ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_left : (mapPair f g).app ⟨left⟩ = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_left CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_left
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_right : (mapPair f g).app ⟨right⟩ = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_right CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_right
/-- The natural isomorphism between two functors out of the walking pair, specified by its
components. -/
@[simps!]
def mapPairIso (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨left⟩) (g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨right⟩) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g)
(fun ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPairIso
end
/-- Every functor out of the walking pair is naturally isomorphic (actually, equal) to a `pair` -/
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoPair (F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) :=
mapPairIso (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoPair
section
variable {D : Type u} [Category.{v} D]
/-- The natural isomorphism between `pair X Y ⋙ F` and `pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y)`. -/
def pairComp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagramIsoPair _
#align category_theory.limits.pair_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pairComp
end
/-- A binary fan is just a cone on a diagram indexing a product. -/
abbrev BinaryFan (X Y : C) :=
Cone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan
/-- The first projection of a binary fan. -/
abbrev BinaryFan.fst {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.fst
/-- The second projection of a binary fan. -/
abbrev BinaryFan.snd {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.fst :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.snd :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_right
/-- A convenient way to show that a binary fan is a limit. -/
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y)
(lift : ∀ {T : C} (_ : T ⟶ X) (_ : T ⟶ Y), T ⟶ s.pt)
(hl₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.fst = f)
(hl₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.snd = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (m : T ⟶ s.pt) (_ : m ≫ s.fst = f) (_ : m ≫ s.snd = g),
m = lift f g) :
IsLimit s :=
Limits.IsLimit.mk (fun t => lift (BinaryFan.fst t) (BinaryFan.snd t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hl₁ _ _
· exact hl₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk
theorem BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) {f g : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext
/-- A binary cofan is just a cocone on a diagram indexing a coproduct. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan (X Y : C) := Cocone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan
/-- The first inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inl
/-- The second inclusion of a binary cofan. -/
abbrev BinaryCofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inr
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_right
/-- A convenient way to show that a binary cofan is a colimit. -/
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y)
(desc : ∀ {T : C} (_ : X ⟶ T) (_ : Y ⟶ T), s.pt ⟶ T)
(hd₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inl ≫ desc f g = f)
(hd₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inr ≫ desc f g = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (m : s.pt ⟶ T) (_ : s.inl ≫ m = f) (_ : s.inr ≫ m = g),
m = desc f g) :
IsColimit s :=
Limits.IsColimit.mk (fun t => desc (BinaryCofan.inl t) (BinaryCofan.inr t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hd₁ _ _
· exact hd₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk
theorem BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s)
{f g : s.pt ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext
variable {X Y : C}
section
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- A binary fan with vertex `P` consists of the two projections `π₁ : P ⟶ X` and `π₂ : P ⟶ Y`. -/
@[simps pt]
def BinaryFan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : BinaryFan X Y where
pt := P
π :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk
/-- A binary cofan with vertex `P` consists of the two inclusions `ι₁ : X ⟶ P` and `ι₂ : Y ⟶ P`. -/
@[simps pt]
def BinaryCofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : BinaryCofan X Y where
pt := P
ι :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_fst {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).fst = π₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_snd {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).snd = π₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inl {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inl = ι₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inr {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inr = ι₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inr
/-- Every `BinaryFan` is isomorphic to an application of `BinaryFan.mk`. -/
def isoBinaryFanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryFan.mk c.fst c.snd :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_fan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryFanMk
/-- Every `BinaryFan` is isomorphic to an application of `BinaryFan.mk`. -/
def isoBinaryCofanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryCofan.mk c.inl c.inr :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_cofan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryCofanMk
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `BinaryFan` constructed using
`BinaryFan.mk` is a limit cone.
-/
def BinaryFan.isLimitMk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (lift : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryFan X Y) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk fst snd) :=
{ lift := lift
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitMk
/-- This is a more convenient formulation to show that a `BinaryCofan` constructed using
`BinaryCofan.mk` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def BinaryCofan.isColimitMk {W : C} {inl : X ⟶ W} {inr : Y ⟶ W}
(desc : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryCofan X Y) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk inl inr) :=
{ desc := desc
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
/-- If `s` is a limit binary fan over `X` and `Y`, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and
`g : W ⟶ Y` induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ s.pt` satisfying `l ≫ s.fst = f` and `l ≫ s.snd = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g } :=
⟨h.lift <| BinaryFan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift'
/-- If `s` is a colimit binary cofan over `X` and `Y`,, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : s.pt ⟶ W` satisfying `s.inl ≫ l = f` and `s.inr ≫ l = g`.
-/
@[simps]
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨h.desc <| BinaryCofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc'
/-- Binary products are symmetric. -/
def BinaryFan.isLimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryFan X Y} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => hc.lift (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitFlip
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal Y) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.fst := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' H (𝟙 X) (h.from X)
exact
⟨⟨l,
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext H (by simpa [hl, -Category.comp_id] using Category.comp_id _)
(h.hom_ext _ _),
hl⟩⟩
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f _ => f ≫ inv c.fst) (fun _ _ => by simp)
(fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ => by simp [← e]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal X) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.snd := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst h (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some).ofIsoLimit (isoBinaryFanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd
/-- If `X' ≅ X`, then `X × Y` also is the product of `X'` and `Y`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : X ⟶ X')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (c.fst ≫ f) c.snd) := by
fapply BinaryFan.isLimitMk
· exact fun s => h.lift (BinaryFan.mk (s.fst ≫ inv f) s.snd)
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [Category.comp_id,BinaryFan.π_app_left,IsIso.inv_hom_id,
BinaryFan.mk_fst,IsLimit.fac_assoc,eq_self_iff_true,Category.assoc]
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,eq_self_iff_true,IsLimit.fac]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: simpa timed out here also
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext h
· simpa only
[BinaryFan.π_app_left,BinaryFan.mk_fst,Category.assoc,IsLimit.fac,IsIso.eq_comp_inv]
· simpa only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,IsLimit.fac]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso
/-- If `Y' ≅ Y`, then `X x Y` also is the product of `X` and `Y'`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : Y ⟶ Y')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.fst (c.snd ≫ f)) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitFlip <| BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso
/-- Binary coproducts are symmetric. -/
def BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial Y) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inl := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' H (𝟙 X) (h.to X)
refine ⟨⟨l, hl, BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext H (?_) (h.hom_ext _ _)⟩⟩
rw [Category.comp_id]
have e : (inl c ≫ l) ≫ inl c = 𝟙 X ≫ inl c := congrArg (·≫inl c) hl
rwa [Category.assoc,Category.id_comp] at e
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f _ => inv c.inl ≫ f)
(fun _ _ => IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc _ _) (fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ =>
(IsIso.eq_inv_comp _).mpr e⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial X) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inr := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl h (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some).ofIsoColimit (isoBinaryCofanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr
/-- If `X' ≅ X`, then `X ⨿ Y` also is the coproduct of `X'` and `Y`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : X' ⟶ X)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (f ≫ c.inl) c.inr) := by
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s => h.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (inv f ≫ s.inl) s.inr)
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
apply BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext h
· rw [← cancel_epi f]
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc] using e₁
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
· simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso
/-- If `Y' ≅ Y`, then `X ⨿ Y` also is the coproduct of `X` and `Y'`. -/
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : Y' ⟶ Y)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inl (f ≫ c.inr)) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip <| BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso
/-- An abbreviation for `HasLimit (pair X Y)`. -/
abbrev HasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) :=
HasLimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_product CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryProduct
/-- An abbreviation for `HasColimit (pair X Y)`. -/
abbrev HasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) :=
HasColimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryCoproduct
/-- If we have a product of `X` and `Y`, we can access it using `prod X Y` or
`X ⨯ Y`. -/
abbrev prod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :=
limit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prod
/-- If we have a coproduct of `X` and `Y`, we can access it using `coprod X Y` or
`X ⨿ Y`. -/
abbrev coprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :=
colimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod
/-- Notation for the product -/
notation:20 X " ⨯ " Y:20 => prod X Y
/-- Notation for the coproduct -/
notation:20 X " ⨿ " Y:20 => coprod X Y
/-- The projection map to the first component of the product. -/
abbrev prod.fst {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.fst
/-- The projection map to the second component of the product. -/
abbrev prod.snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.snd
/-- The inclusion map from the first component of the coproduct. -/
abbrev coprod.inl {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl
/-- The inclusion map from the second component of the coproduct. -/
abbrev coprod.inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr
/-- The binary fan constructed from the projection maps is a limit. -/
def prodIsProd (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) prod.snd) :=
(limit.isLimit _).ofIsoLimit (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
))
#align category_theory.limits.prod_is_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prodIsProd
/-- The binary cofan constructed from the coprojection maps is a colimit. -/
def coprodIsCoprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) coprod.inr) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).ofIsoColimit (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
))
#align category_theory.limits.coprod_is_coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprodIsCoprod
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] {f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y}
(h₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext (limit.isLimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.prod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.hom_ext
@[ext 1100]
theorem coprod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] {f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W}
(h₁ : coprod.inl ≫ f = coprod.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : coprod.inr ≫ f = coprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (colimit.isColimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.hom_ext
/-- If the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and `g : W ⟶ Y`
induces a morphism `prod.lift f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y`. -/
abbrev prod.lift {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y :=
limit.lift _ (BinaryFan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift
/-- diagonal arrow of the binary product in the category `fam I` -/
abbrev diag (X : C) [HasBinaryProduct X X] : X ⟶ X ⨯ X :=
prod.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.diag CategoryTheory.Limits.diag
/-- If the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `coprod.desc f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W`. -/
abbrev coprod.desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (BinaryCofan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc
/-- codiagonal arrow of the binary coproduct -/
abbrev codiag (X : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] : X ⨿ X ⟶ X :=
coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.codiag
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.fst = f :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.snd = g :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc f g = f :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc f g = g :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono f] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono g] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_snd _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi f] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inl_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi g] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inr_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right
/-- If the product of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ X` and `g : W ⟶ Y`
induces a morphism `l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y` satisfying `l ≫ Prod.fst = f` and `l ≫ Prod.snd = g`. -/
def prod.lift' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
{ l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y // l ≫ prod.fst = f ∧ l ≫ prod.snd = g } :=
⟨prod.lift f g, prod.lift_fst _ _, prod.lift_snd _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift'
/-- If the coproduct of `X` and `Y` exists, then every pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ W` and
`g : Y ⟶ W` induces a morphism `l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W` satisfying `coprod.inl ≫ l = f` and
`coprod.inr ≫ l = g`. -/
def coprod.desc' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
{ l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W // coprod.inl ≫ l = f ∧ coprod.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨coprod.desc f g, coprod.inl_desc _ _, coprod.inr_desc _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc'
/-- If the products `W ⨯ X` and `Y ⨯ Z` exist, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ Y` and
`g : X ⟶ Z` induces a morphism `prod.map f g : W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z`. -/
def prod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z :=
limMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map
/-- If the coproducts `W ⨿ X` and `Y ⨿ Z` exist, then every pair of morphisms `f : W ⟶ Y` and
`g : W ⟶ Z` induces a morphism `coprod.map f g : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z`. -/
def coprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z :=
colimMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map
section ProdLemmas
-- Making the reassoc version of this a simp lemma seems to be more harmful than helpful.
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem prod.comp_lift {V W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : W ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ prod.lift g h = prod.lift (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.comp_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_lift
#align category_theory.limits.prod.comp_lift_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_lift_assoc
theorem prod.comp_diag {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct Y Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ diag Y = prod.lift f f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.comp_diag CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.comp_diag
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_fst {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.fst = prod.fst ≫ f :=
limMap_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_fst_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_fst_assoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_snd {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : prod.map f g ≫ prod.snd = prod.snd ≫ g :=
limMap_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_snd_assoc
@[simp]
theorem prod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : prod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_id_id
@[simp]
theorem prod.lift_fst_snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
prod.lift prod.fst prod.snd = 𝟙 (X ⨯ Y) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.lift_map {V W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : V ⟶ W)
(g : V ⟶ X) (h : W ⟶ Y) (k : X ⟶ Z) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.lift (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_map
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_map_assoc
@[simp]
theorem prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W Y] [HasBinaryProduct X Z]
(g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) : prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ g) (prod.snd ≫ g') = prod.map g g' := by
rw [← prod.lift_map]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_comp_snd_comp
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `map_fst` and `map_snd` can still work just
-- as well.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem prod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C} [HasBinaryProduct A₁ B₁] [HasBinaryProduct A₂ B₂]
[HasBinaryProduct A₃ B₃] (f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
prod.map f g ≫ prod.map h k = prod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_map
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_map_assoc
-- TODO: is it necessary to weaken the assumption here?
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] :
prod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 B) = prod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ prod.map (𝟙 Y) f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_swap CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_swap
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_swap_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_swap_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.map_comp_id {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasBinaryProduct X W]
[HasBinaryProduct Z W] [HasBinaryProduct Y W] :
prod.map (f ≫ g) (𝟙 W) = prod.map f (𝟙 W) ≫ prod.map g (𝟙 W) := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_comp_id CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_comp_id
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_comp_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_comp_id_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.map_id_comp {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasBinaryProduct W X]
[HasBinaryProduct W Y] [HasBinaryProduct W Z] :
prod.map (𝟙 W) (f ≫ g) = prod.map (𝟙 W) f ≫ prod.map (𝟙 W) g := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_id_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_id_comp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_id_comp_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_id_comp_assoc
/-- If the products `W ⨯ X` and `Y ⨯ Z` exist, then every pair of isomorphisms `f : W ≅ Y` and
`g : X ≅ Z` induces an isomorphism `prod.mapIso f g : W ⨯ X ≅ Y ⨯ Z`. -/
@[simps]
def prod.mapIso {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ≅ Y)
(g : X ≅ Z) : W ⨯ X ≅ Y ⨯ Z where
hom := prod.map f.hom g.hom
inv := prod.map f.inv g.inv
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mapIso
instance isIso_prod {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsIso g] : IsIso (prod.map f g) :=
(prod.mapIso (asIso f) (asIso g)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.limits.is_iso_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.isIso_prod
instance prod.map_mono {C : Type*} [Category C] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [Mono f]
[Mono g] [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] : Mono (prod.map f g) :=
⟨fun i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· rw [← cancel_mono f]
simpa using congr_arg (fun f => f ≫ prod.fst) h
· rw [← cancel_mono g]
simpa using congr_arg (fun f => f ≫ prod.snd) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map_mono
@[reassoc] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove these
theorem prod.diag_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasBinaryProduct X X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Y] :
diag X ≫ prod.map f f = f ≫ diag Y := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.diag_map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.diag_map
#align category_theory.limits.prod.diag_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.diag_map_assoc
@[reassoc] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove these
theorem prod.diag_map_fst_snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] [HasBinaryProduct (X ⨯ Y) (X ⨯ Y)] :
diag (X ⨯ Y) ≫ prod.map prod.fst prod.snd = 𝟙 (X ⨯ Y) := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd_assoc
@[reassoc] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove these
theorem prod.diag_map_fst_snd_comp [HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] {X X' Y Y' : C}
(g : X ⟶ Y) (g' : X' ⟶ Y') :
diag (X ⨯ X') ≫ prod.map (prod.fst ≫ g) (prod.snd ≫ g') = prod.map g g' := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd_comp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd_comp_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.diag_map_fst_snd_comp_assoc
instance {X : C} [HasBinaryProduct X X] : IsSplitMono (diag X) :=
IsSplitMono.mk' { retraction := prod.fst }
end ProdLemmas
section CoprodLemmas
-- @[reassoc (attr := simp)]
@[simp] -- Porting note: removing reassoc tag since result is not hygienic (two h's)
theorem coprod.desc_comp {V W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : X ⟶ V)
(h : Y ⟶ V) : coprod.desc g h ≫ f = coprod.desc (g ≫ f) (h ≫ f) := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_comp
-- Porting note: hand generated reassoc here. Simp can prove it
theorem coprod.desc_comp_assoc {C : Type u} [Category C] {V W X Y : C}
[HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : X ⟶ V) (h : Y ⟶ V) {Z : C} (l : W ⟶ Z) :
coprod.desc g h ≫ f ≫ l = coprod.desc (g ≫ f) (h ≫ f) ≫ l := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_comp_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_comp
theorem coprod.diag_comp {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
codiag X ≫ f = coprod.desc f f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.diag_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.diag_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coprod.inl_map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : coprod.inl ≫ coprod.map f g = f ≫ coprod.inl :=
ι_colimMap _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_map
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_map_assoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coprod.inr_map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : coprod.inr ≫ coprod.map f g = g ≫ coprod.inr :=
ι_colimMap _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_map
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_map_assoc
@[simp]
theorem coprod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : coprod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_id_id
@[simp]
theorem coprod.desc_inl_inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
coprod.desc coprod.inl coprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⨿ Y) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_inl_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_inl_inr
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem coprod.map_desc {S T U V W : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct U W] [HasBinaryCoproduct T V]
(f : U ⟶ S) (g : W ⟶ S) (h : T ⟶ U) (k : V ⟶ W) :
coprod.map h k ≫ coprod.desc f g = coprod.desc (h ≫ f) (k ≫ g) := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_desc_assoc
@[simp]
theorem coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W Y]
[HasBinaryCoproduct X Z] (g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
coprod.desc (g ≫ coprod.inl) (g' ≫ coprod.inr) = coprod.map g g' := by
rw [← coprod.map_desc]; simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `inl_map` and `inr_map` can still work just
-- as well.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coprod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct A₁ B₁] [HasBinaryCoproduct A₂ B₂]
[HasBinaryCoproduct A₃ B₃] (f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
coprod.map f g ≫ coprod.map h k = coprod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_map
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_map_assoc
-- I don't think it's a good idea to make any of the following three simp lemmas.
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] :
coprod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ coprod.map g (𝟙 B) = coprod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 Y) f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_swap CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_swap
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_swap_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_swap_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.map_comp_id {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasBinaryCoproduct Z W]
[HasBinaryCoproduct Y W] [HasBinaryCoproduct X W] :
coprod.map (f ≫ g) (𝟙 W) = coprod.map f (𝟙 W) ≫ coprod.map g (𝟙 W) := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_comp_id CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_comp_id
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_comp_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_comp_id_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.map_id_comp {X Y Z W : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasBinaryCoproduct W X]
[HasBinaryCoproduct W Y] [HasBinaryCoproduct W Z] :
coprod.map (𝟙 W) (f ≫ g) = coprod.map (𝟙 W) f ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 W) g := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_id_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_id_comp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_id_comp_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_id_comp_assoc
/-- If the coproducts `W ⨿ X` and `Y ⨿ Z` exist, then every pair of isomorphisms `f : W ≅ Y` and
`g : W ≅ Z` induces an isomorphism `coprod.mapIso f g : W ⨿ X ≅ Y ⨿ Z`. -/
@[simps]
def coprod.mapIso {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ≅ Y)
(g : X ≅ Z) : W ⨿ X ≅ Y ⨿ Z where
hom := coprod.map f.hom g.hom
inv := coprod.map f.inv g.inv
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.mapIso
instance isIso_coprod {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsIso g] : IsIso (coprod.map f g) :=
(coprod.mapIso (asIso f) (asIso g)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.limits.is_iso_coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.isIso_coprod
instance coprod.map_epi {C : Type*} [Category C] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) [Epi f]
[Epi g] [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] : Epi (coprod.map f g) :=
⟨fun i₁ i₂ h => by
ext
· rw [← cancel_epi f]
simpa using congr_arg (fun f => coprod.inl ≫ f) h
· rw [← cancel_epi g]
simpa using congr_arg (fun f => coprod.inr ≫ f) h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_epi CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_epi
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: and the og version too
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.map_codiag {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Y] :
coprod.map f f ≫ codiag Y = codiag X ≫ f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_codiag
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_codiag_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_codiag_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: and the og version too
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.map_inl_inr_codiag {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y]
[HasBinaryCoproduct (X ⨿ Y) (X ⨿ Y)] :
coprod.map coprod.inl coprod.inr ≫ codiag (X ⨿ Y) = 𝟙 (X ⨿ Y) := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_inl_inr_codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_inl_inr_codiag
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_inl_inr_codiag_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_inl_inr_codiag_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: and the og version too
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.map_comp_inl_inr_codiag [HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] {X X' Y Y' : C}
(g : X ⟶ Y) (g' : X' ⟶ Y') :
coprod.map (g ≫ coprod.inl) (g' ≫ coprod.inr) ≫ codiag (Y ⨿ Y') = coprod.map g g' := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_comp_inl_inr_codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_comp_inl_inr_codiag
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_comp_inl_inr_codiag_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_comp_inl_inr_codiag_assoc
end CoprodLemmas
variable (C)
/-- `HasBinaryProducts` represents a choice of product for every pair of objects.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/001T>.
-/
abbrev HasBinaryProducts :=
HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_products CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryProducts
/-- `HasBinaryCoproducts` represents a choice of coproduct for every pair of objects.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/04AP>.
-/
abbrev HasBinaryCoproducts :=
HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_coproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryCoproducts
/-- If `C` has all limits of diagrams `pair X Y`, then it has all binary products -/
theorem hasBinaryProducts_of_hasLimit_pair [∀ {X Y : C}, HasLimit (pair X Y)] :
HasBinaryProducts C :=
{ has_limit := fun F => hasLimitOfIso (diagramIsoPair F).symm }
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_products_of_has_limit_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBinaryProducts_of_hasLimit_pair
/-- If `C` has all colimits of diagrams `pair X Y`, then it has all binary coproducts -/
theorem hasBinaryCoproducts_of_hasColimit_pair [∀ {X Y : C}, HasColimit (pair X Y)] :
HasBinaryCoproducts C :=
{ has_colimit := fun F => hasColimitOfIso (diagramIsoPair F) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_coproducts_of_has_colimit_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBinaryCoproducts_of_hasColimit_pair
section
variable {C}
/-- The braiding isomorphism which swaps a binary product. -/
@[simps]
def prod.braiding (P Q : C) [HasBinaryProduct P Q] [HasBinaryProduct Q P] : P ⨯ Q ≅ Q ⨯ P where
hom := prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst
inv := prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.braiding CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.braiding
/-- The braiding isomorphism can be passed through a map by swapping the order. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem braid_natural [HasBinaryProducts C] {W X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ W) :
prod.map f g ≫ (prod.braiding _ _).hom = (prod.braiding _ _).hom ≫ prod.map g f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.braid_natural CategoryTheory.Limits.braid_natural
#align category_theory.limits.braid_natural_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.braid_natural_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.symmetry' (P Q : C) [HasBinaryProduct P Q] [HasBinaryProduct Q P] :
prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst ≫ prod.lift prod.snd prod.fst = 𝟙 (P ⨯ Q) :=
(prod.braiding _ _).hom_inv_id
#align category_theory.limits.prod.symmetry' CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.symmetry'
#align category_theory.limits.prod.symmetry'_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.symmetry'_assoc
/-- The braiding isomorphism is symmetric. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.symmetry (P Q : C) [HasBinaryProduct P Q] [HasBinaryProduct Q P] :
(prod.braiding P Q).hom ≫ (prod.braiding Q P).hom = 𝟙 _ :=
(prod.braiding _ _).hom_inv_id
#align category_theory.limits.prod.symmetry CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.symmetry
#align category_theory.limits.prod.symmetry_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.symmetry_assoc
/-- The associator isomorphism for binary products. -/
@[simps]
def prod.associator [HasBinaryProducts C] (P Q R : C) : (P ⨯ Q) ⨯ R ≅ P ⨯ Q ⨯ R where
hom := prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ prod.fst) (prod.lift (prod.fst ≫ prod.snd) prod.snd)
inv := prod.lift (prod.lift prod.fst (prod.snd ≫ prod.fst)) (prod.snd ≫ prod.snd)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.associator CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.associator
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.pentagon [HasBinaryProducts C] (W X Y Z : C) :
prod.map (prod.associator W X Y).hom (𝟙 Z) ≫
(prod.associator W (X ⨯ Y) Z).hom ≫ prod.map (𝟙 W) (prod.associator X Y Z).hom =
(prod.associator (W ⨯ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (prod.associator W X (Y ⨯ Z)).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.pentagon CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.pentagon
#align category_theory.limits.prod.pentagon_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.pentagon_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.associator_naturality [HasBinaryProducts C] {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁)
(f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃) :
prod.map (prod.map f₁ f₂) f₃ ≫ (prod.associator Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom =
(prod.associator X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ prod.map f₁ (prod.map f₂ f₃) := by
simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.associator_naturality CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.associator_naturality
#align category_theory.limits.prod.associator_naturality_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.associator_naturality_assoc
variable [HasTerminal C]
/-- The left unitor isomorphism for binary products with the terminal object. -/
@[simps]
def prod.leftUnitor (P : C) [HasBinaryProduct (⊤_ C) P] : (⊤_ C) ⨯ P ≅ P where
hom := prod.snd
inv := prod.lift (terminal.from P) (𝟙 _)
hom_inv_id := by apply prod.hom_ext <;> simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
inv_hom_id := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.leftUnitor
/-- The right unitor isomorphism for binary products with the terminal object. -/
@[simps]
def prod.rightUnitor (P : C) [HasBinaryProduct P (⊤_ C)] : P ⨯ ⊤_ C ≅ P where
hom := prod.fst
inv := prod.lift (𝟙 _) (terminal.from P)
hom_inv_id := by apply prod.hom_ext <;> simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
inv_hom_id := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.prod.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.rightUnitor
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.leftUnitor_hom_naturality [HasBinaryProducts C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.map (𝟙 _) f ≫ (prod.leftUnitor Y).hom = (prod.leftUnitor X).hom ≫ f :=
prod.map_snd _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.left_unitor_hom_naturality CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.leftUnitor_hom_naturality
#align category_theory.limits.prod.left_unitor_hom_naturality_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.leftUnitor_hom_naturality_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.leftUnitor_inv_naturality [HasBinaryProducts C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(prod.leftUnitor X).inv ≫ prod.map (𝟙 _) f = f ≫ (prod.leftUnitor Y).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, prod.leftUnitor_hom_naturality]
#align category_theory.limits.prod.left_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.leftUnitor_inv_naturality
#align category_theory.limits.prod.left_unitor_inv_naturality_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.leftUnitor_inv_naturality_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.rightUnitor_hom_naturality [HasBinaryProducts C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.map f (𝟙 _) ≫ (prod.rightUnitor Y).hom = (prod.rightUnitor X).hom ≫ f :=
prod.map_fst _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.right_unitor_hom_naturality CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.rightUnitor_hom_naturality
#align category_theory.limits.prod.right_unitor_hom_naturality_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.rightUnitor_hom_naturality_assoc
@[reassoc]
theorem prod_rightUnitor_inv_naturality [HasBinaryProducts C] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
(prod.rightUnitor X).inv ≫ prod.map f (𝟙 _) = f ≫ (prod.rightUnitor Y).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, prod.rightUnitor_hom_naturality]
#align category_theory.limits.prod_right_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Limits.prod_rightUnitor_inv_naturality
#align category_theory.limits.prod_right_unitor_inv_naturality_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod_rightUnitor_inv_naturality_assoc
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/BinaryProducts.lean | 1,113 | 1,116 | theorem prod.triangle [HasBinaryProducts C] (X Y : C) :
(prod.associator X (⊤_ C) Y).hom ≫ prod.map (𝟙 X) (prod.leftUnitor Y).hom =
prod.map (prod.rightUnitor X).hom (𝟙 Y) := by |
ext <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate
open Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
#align nnreal.rpow NNReal.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_pow NNReal.rpow_eq_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_rpow NNReal.coe_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
#align nnreal.rpow_zero NNReal.rpow_zero
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_zero_iff NNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
#align nnreal.zero_rpow NNReal.zero_rpow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
#align nnreal.rpow_one NNReal.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
#align nnreal.one_rpow NNReal.one_rpow
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) _ _
#align nnreal.rpow_add NNReal.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_add' NNReal.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
#align nnreal.rpow_mul NNReal.rpow_mul
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
#align nnreal.rpow_neg NNReal.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
#align nnreal.rpow_neg_one NNReal.rpow_neg_one
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) y z
#align nnreal.rpow_sub NNReal.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
#align nnreal.rpow_sub' NNReal.rpow_sub'
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_inv_rpow_self NNReal.rpow_inv_rpow_self
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
#align nnreal.rpow_self_rpow_inv NNReal.rpow_self_rpow_inv
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
#align nnreal.inv_rpow NNReal.inv_rpow
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
#align nnreal.div_rpow NNReal.div_rpow
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
#align nnreal.sqrt_eq_rpow NNReal.sqrt_eq_rpow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
#align nnreal.rpow_nat_cast NNReal.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
#align nnreal.rpow_two NNReal.rpow_two
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
#align nnreal.mul_rpow NNReal.mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom`-/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`-/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow NNReal.rpow_le_rpow
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_iff NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_iff NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff
theorem le_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
#align nnreal.le_rpow_one_div_iff NNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff
theorem rpow_one_div_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ (1 / z) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
#align nnreal.rpow_one_div_le_iff NNReal.rpow_one_div_le_iff
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
#align nnreal.rpow_pos NNReal.rpow_pos
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_one NNReal.rpow_lt_one
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_one NNReal.rpow_le_one
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
#align nnreal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg NNReal.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
#align nnreal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos NNReal.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
#align nnreal.one_lt_rpow NNReal.one_lt_rpow
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
#align nnreal.one_le_rpow NNReal.one_le_rpow
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
#align nnreal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg NNReal.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
#align nnreal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos NNReal.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
#align nnreal.rpow_le_self_of_le_one NNReal.rpow_le_self_of_le_one
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
#align nnreal.rpow_left_injective NNReal.rpow_left_injective
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
#align nnreal.rpow_eq_rpow_iff NNReal.rpow_eq_rpow_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, _root_.inv_mul_cancel hx, rpow_one]⟩
#align nnreal.rpow_left_surjective NNReal.rpow_left_surjective
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
#align nnreal.rpow_left_bijective NNReal.rpow_left_bijective
theorem eq_rpow_one_div_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ (1 / z) ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
#align nnreal.eq_rpow_one_div_iff NNReal.eq_rpow_one_div_iff
theorem rpow_one_div_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 / z) = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
#align nnreal.rpow_one_div_eq_iff NNReal.rpow_one_div_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
#align nnreal.pow_nat_rpow_nat_inv NNReal.pow_rpow_inv_natCast
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
#align nnreal.rpow_nat_inv_pow_nat NNReal.rpow_inv_natCast_pow
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
#align real.to_nnreal_rpow_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
#align ennreal.rpow ENNReal.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
#align ennreal.rpow_eq_pow ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
#align ennreal.rpow_zero ENNReal.rpow_zero
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
#align ennreal.top_rpow_def ENNReal.top_rpow_def
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
#align ennreal.top_rpow_of_pos ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
#align ennreal.top_rpow_of_neg ENNReal.top_rpow_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_of_pos ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_of_neg ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_neg
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_def ENNReal.zero_rpow_def
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
#align ennreal.zero_rpow_mul_self ENNReal.zero_rpow_mul_self
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
#align ennreal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero
@[norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 452 | 457 | theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (x ^ y : ℝ≥0) := by |
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.nat.pairing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
/-!
# Naturals pairing function
This file defines a pairing function for the naturals as follows:
```text
0 1 4 9 16
2 3 5 10 17
6 7 8 11 18
12 13 14 15 19
20 21 22 23 24
```
It has the advantage of being monotone in both directions and sending `⟦0, n^2 - 1⟧` to
`⟦0, n - 1⟧²`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Prod Decidable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Pairing function for the natural numbers. -/
-- Porting note: no pp_nodot
--@[pp_nodot]
def pair (a b : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if a < b then b * b + a else a * a + a + b
#align nat.mkpair Nat.pair
/-- Unpairing function for the natural numbers. -/
-- Porting note: no pp_nodot
--@[pp_nodot]
def unpair (n : ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
let s := sqrt n
if n - s * s < s then (n - s * s, s) else (s, n - s * s - s)
#align nat.unpair Nat.unpair
@[simp]
theorem pair_unpair (n : ℕ) : pair (unpair n).1 (unpair n).2 = n := by
dsimp only [unpair]; let s := sqrt n
have sm : s * s + (n - s * s) = n := Nat.add_sub_cancel' (sqrt_le _)
split_ifs with h
· simp [pair, h, sm]
· have hl : n - s * s - s ≤ s := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.2
(Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <| by rw [← Nat.add_assoc]; apply sqrt_le_add)
simp [pair, hl.not_lt, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (le_of_not_gt h), sm]
#align nat.mkpair_unpair Nat.pair_unpair
theorem pair_unpair' {n a b} (H : unpair n = (a, b)) : pair a b = n := by
simpa [H] using pair_unpair n
#align nat.mkpair_unpair' Nat.pair_unpair'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Pairing.lean | 64 | 73 | theorem unpair_pair (a b : ℕ) : unpair (pair a b) = (a, b) := by |
dsimp only [pair]; split_ifs with h
· show unpair (b * b + a) = (a, b)
have be : sqrt (b * b + a) = b := sqrt_add_eq _ (le_trans (le_of_lt h) (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
simp [unpair, be, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, h]
· show unpair (a * a + a + b) = (a, b)
have ae : sqrt (a * a + (a + b)) = a := by
rw [sqrt_add_eq]
exact Nat.add_le_add_left (le_of_not_gt h) _
simp [unpair, ae, Nat.not_lt_zero, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
/-!
# Verification of the `Ordnode α` datatype
This file proves the correctness of the operations in `Data.Ordmap.Ordnode`.
The public facing version is the type `Ordset α`, which is a wrapper around
`Ordnode α` which includes the correctness invariant of the type, and it exposes
parallel operations like `insert` as functions on `Ordset` that do the same
thing but bundle the correctness proofs. The advantage is that it is possible
to, for example, prove that the result of `find` on `insert` will actually find
the element, while `Ordnode` cannot guarantee this if the input tree did not
satisfy the type invariants.
## Main definitions
* `Ordset α`: A well formed set of values of type `α`
## Implementation notes
The majority of this file is actually in the `Ordnode` namespace, because we first
have to prove the correctness of all the operations (and defining what correctness
means here is actually somewhat subtle). So all the actual `Ordset` operations are
at the very end, once we have all the theorems.
An `Ordnode α` is an inductive type which describes a tree which stores the `size` at
internal nodes. The correctness invariant of an `Ordnode α` is:
* `Ordnode.Sized t`: All internal `size` fields must match the actual measured
size of the tree. (This is not hard to satisfy.)
* `Ordnode.Balanced t`: Unless the tree has the form `()` or `((a) b)` or `(a (b))`
(that is, nil or a single singleton subtree), the two subtrees must satisfy
`size l ≤ δ * size r` and `size r ≤ δ * size l`, where `δ := 3` is a global
parameter of the data structure (and this property must hold recursively at subtrees).
This is why we say this is a "size balanced tree" data structure.
* `Ordnode.Bounded lo hi t`: The members of the tree must be in strictly increasing order,
meaning that if `a` is in the left subtree and `b` is the root, then `a ≤ b` and
`¬ (b ≤ a)`. We enforce this using `Ordnode.Bounded` which includes also a global
upper and lower bound.
Because the `Ordnode` file was ported from Haskell, the correctness invariants of some
of the functions have not been spelled out, and some theorems like
`Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux` show very intricate assumptions on the sizes,
which may need to be revised if it turns out some operations violate these assumptions,
because there is a decent amount of slop in the actual data structure invariants, so the
theorem will go through with multiple choices of assumption.
**Note:** This file is incomplete, in the sense that the intent is to have verified
versions and lemmas about all the definitions in `Ordnode.lean`, but at the moment only
a few operations are verified (the hard part should be out of the way, but still).
Contributors are encouraged to pick this up and finish the job, if it appeals to you.
## Tags
ordered map, ordered set, data structure, verified programming
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
/-! ### delta and ratio -/
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
/-! ### `singleton` -/
/-! ### `size` and `empty` -/
/-- O(n). Computes the actual number of elements in the set, ignoring the cached `size` field. -/
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
/-! ### `Sized` -/
/-- The `Sized` property asserts that all the `size` fields in nodes match the actual size of the
respective subtrees. -/
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
/-! `dual` -/
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
/-! `Balanced` -/
/-- The `BalancedSz l r` asserts that a hypothetical tree with children of sizes `l` and `r` is
balanced: either `l ≤ δ * r` and `r ≤ δ * r`, or the tree is trivial with a singleton on one side
and nothing on the other. -/
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
/-- The `Balanced t` asserts that the tree `t` satisfies the balance invariants
(at every level). -/
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
/-! ### `rotate` and `balance` -/
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, left associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, right associated (ignores the invariants). -/
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> (a ()) b` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
/-- Build a tree from three nodes, with `a () b -> a (() b)` and `a (b c) d -> ((a b) (c d))`. -/
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a left rotation `x (y z) -> ((x y) z)`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- Concatenate two nodes, performing a right rotation `(x y) z -> (x (y z))`
if balance is upset. -/
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
/-- A left balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
/-- A right balance operation. This will rebalance a concatenation, assuming the original nodes are
not too far from balanced. -/
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
/-- The full balance operation. This is the same as `balance`, but with less manual inlining.
It is somewhat easier to work with this version in proofs. -/
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
/-! ## `All`, `Any`, `Emem`, `Amem` -/
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
/-! ### `toList` -/
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
/-! ### `mem` -/
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 574 | 575 | theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by | cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.arctan from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# The `arctan` function.
Inequalities, identities and `Real.tan` as a `PartialHomeomorph` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)`
and the whole line.
The result of `arctan x + arctan y` is given by `arctan_add`, `arctan_add_eq_add_pi` or
`arctan_add_eq_sub_pi` depending on whether `x * y < 1` and `0 < x`. As an application of
`arctan_add` we give four Machin-like formulas (linear combinations of arctangents equal to
`π / 4 = arctan 1`), including John Machin's original one at
`four_mul_arctan_inv_5_sub_arctan_inv_239`.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Real
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology Real
theorem tan_add {x y : ℝ}
(h : ((∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) ∨
(∃ k : ℤ, x = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∃ l : ℤ, y = (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_sub, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_div,
Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.ofReal_tan] using
@Complex.tan_add (x : ℂ) (y : ℂ) (by convert h <;> norm_cast)
#align real.tan_add Real.tan_add
theorem tan_add' {x y : ℝ}
(h : (∀ k : ℤ, x ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2) ∧ ∀ l : ℤ, y ≠ (2 * l + 1) * π / 2) :
tan (x + y) = (tan x + tan y) / (1 - tan x * tan y) :=
tan_add (Or.inl h)
#align real.tan_add' Real.tan_add'
theorem tan_two_mul {x : ℝ} : tan (2 * x) = 2 * tan x / (1 - tan x ^ 2) := by
have := @Complex.tan_two_mul x
norm_cast at *
#align real.tan_two_mul Real.tan_two_mul
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
#align real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two Real.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
theorem continuousOn_tan : ContinuousOn tan {x | cos x ≠ 0} := by
suffices ContinuousOn (fun x => sin x / cos x) {x | cos x ≠ 0} by
have h_eq : (fun x => sin x / cos x) = tan := by ext1 x; rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
rwa [h_eq] at this
exact continuousOn_sin.div continuousOn_cos fun x => id
#align real.continuous_on_tan Real.continuousOn_tan
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_tan : Continuous fun x : {x | cos x ≠ 0} => tan x :=
continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_tan
#align real.continuous_tan Real.continuous_tan
theorem continuousOn_tan_Ioo : ContinuousOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
refine ContinuousOn.mono continuousOn_tan fun x => ?_
simp only [and_imp, mem_Ioo, mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
rw [cos_eq_zero_iff]
rintro hx_gt hx_lt ⟨r, hxr_eq⟩
rcases le_or_lt 0 r with h | h
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_lt
refine hx_lt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
simp [h]
· rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at hx_gt
refine hx_gt ?_
rw [hxr_eq, ← one_mul (π / 2), mul_div_assoc, ge_iff_le, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul,
mul_le_mul_right (half_pos pi_pos)]
have hr_le : r ≤ -1 := by rwa [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, ← le_neg_iff_add_nonpos_right] at h
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, mul_comm, ← le_div_iff]
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
rw [← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_neg]; norm_cast
· exact zero_lt_two
#align real.continuous_on_tan_Ioo Real.continuousOn_tan_Ioo
theorem surjOn_tan : SurjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) univ :=
have := neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos
continuousOn_tan_Ioo.surjOn_of_tendsto (nonempty_Ioo.2 this)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atBot this]; exact tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two)
(by rw [tendsto_comp_coe_Ioo_atTop this]; exact tendsto_tan_pi_div_two)
#align real.surj_on_tan Real.surjOn_tan
theorem tan_surjective : Function.Surjective tan := fun _ => surjOn_tan.subset_range trivial
#align real.tan_surjective Real.tan_surjective
theorem image_tan_Ioo : tan '' Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) = univ :=
univ_subset_iff.1 surjOn_tan
#align real.image_tan_Ioo Real.image_tan_Ioo
/-- `Real.tan` as an `OrderIso` between `(-(π / 2), π / 2)` and `ℝ`. -/
def tanOrderIso : Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o ℝ :=
(strictMonoOn_tan.orderIso _ _).trans <|
(OrderIso.setCongr _ _ image_tan_Ioo).trans OrderIso.Set.univ
#align real.tan_order_iso Real.tanOrderIso
/-- Inverse of the `tan` function, returns values in the range `-π / 2 < arctan x` and
`arctan x < π / 2` -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def arctan (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
tanOrderIso.symm x
#align real.arctan Real.arctan
@[simp]
theorem tan_arctan (x : ℝ) : tan (arctan x) = x :=
tanOrderIso.apply_symm_apply x
#align real.tan_arctan Real.tan_arctan
theorem arctan_mem_Ioo (x : ℝ) : arctan x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
Subtype.coe_prop _
#align real.arctan_mem_Ioo Real.arctan_mem_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem range_arctan : range arctan = Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) :=
((EquivLike.surjective _).range_comp _).trans Subtype.range_coe
#align real.range_arctan Real.range_arctan
theorem arctan_tan {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2) : arctan (tan x) = x :=
Subtype.ext_iff.1 <| tanOrderIso.symm_apply_apply ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩
#align real.arctan_tan Real.arctan_tan
theorem cos_arctan_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < cos (arctan x) :=
cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo <| arctan_mem_Ioo x
#align real.cos_arctan_pos Real.cos_arctan_pos
theorem cos_sq_arctan (x : ℝ) : cos (arctan x) ^ 2 = 1 / (1 + x ^ 2) := by
rw_mod_cast [one_div, ← inv_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x).ne', tan_arctan]
#align real.cos_sq_arctan Real.cos_sq_arctan
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Arctan.lean | 142 | 143 | theorem sin_arctan (x : ℝ) : sin (arctan x) = x / √(1 + x ^ 2) := by |
rw_mod_cast [← tan_div_sqrt_one_add_tan_sq (cos_arctan_pos x), tan_arctan]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.ToSquareZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.PDeriv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivation
#align_import ring_theory.kaehler from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4b92a463033b5587bb011657e25e4710bfca7364"
/-!
# The module of kaehler differentials
## Main results
- `KaehlerDifferential`: The module of kaehler differentials. For an `R`-algebra `S`, we provide
the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.D`: The derivation into the module of kaehler differentials.
- `KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation`: The image of `D` spans `Ω[S⁄R]` as an `S`-module.
- `KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation`:
The isomorphism `Hom_R(Ω[S⁄R], M) ≃ₗ[S] Der_R(S, M)`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.quotKerTotalEquiv`: An alternative description of `Ω[S⁄R]` as `S` copies
of `S` with kernel (`KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal`) generated by the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
- `KaehlerDifferential.map`: Given a map between the arrows `R →+* A` and `S →+* B`, we have an
`A`-linear map `Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄S]`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.map_surjective`:
The sequence `Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A] → 0` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_mapBaseChange_map`:
The sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A]` is exact.
## Future project
- Define the `IsKaehlerDifferential` predicate.
-/
suppress_compilation
section KaehlerDifferential
open scoped TensorProduct
open Algebra
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
/-- The kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`. -/
abbrev KaehlerDifferential.ideal : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) :=
RingHom.ker (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S)
#align kaehler_differential.ideal KaehlerDifferential.ideal
variable {S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal (a : S) :
(1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] a - a ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) ∈ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
#align kaehler_differential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal
variable {R}
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- For a `R`-derivation `S → M`, this is the map `S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M` sending `s ⊗ₜ t ↦ s • D t`. -/
def Derivation.tensorProductTo (D : Derivation R S M) : S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift ((LinearMap.lsmul S (S →ₗ[R] M)).flip D.toLinearMap)
#align derivation.tensor_product_to Derivation.tensorProductTo
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul (D : Derivation R S M) (s t : S) :
D.tensorProductTo (s ⊗ₜ t) = s • D t := rfl
#align derivation.tensor_product_to_tmul Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul (D : Derivation R S M) (x y : S ⊗[R] S) :
D.tensorProductTo (x * y) =
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x • D.tensorProductTo y +
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R y • D.tensorProductTo x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [zero_mul, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [add_mul, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x₁ x₂
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [mul_zero, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [mul_add, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x y
simp only [TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo,
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, TensorProduct.lift.tmul',
TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul]
dsimp
rw [D.leibniz]
simp only [smul_smul, smul_add, mul_comm (x * y) x₁, mul_right_comm x₁ x₂, ← mul_assoc]
#align derivation.tensor_product_to_mul Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul
variable (R S)
/-- The kernel of `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S` is generated by `1 ⊗ s - s ⊗ 1` as a `S`-module. -/
theorem KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal :
Submodule.span S (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· rintro x (hx : _ = _)
have : x - TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x := by
rw [hx, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]
rw [← this]
clear this hx
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [map_zero, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]; exact zero_mem _
· intro x y
have : x ⊗ₜ[R] y - (x * y) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x • ((1 : S) ⊗ₜ y - y ⊗ₜ (1 : S)) := by
simp_rw [smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul, this]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ x ?_
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact Set.mem_range_self y
· intro x y hx hy
rw [map_add, TensorProduct.add_tmul, ← sub_add_sub_comm]
exact add_mem hx hy
#align kaehler_differential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal :
Ideal.span (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· change (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S ≤ (Ideal.span _).restrictScalars S
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span]
conv_rhs => rw [← Submodule.span_span_of_tower S]
exact Submodule.subset_span
#align kaehler_differential.span_range_eq_ideal KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal
/-- The module of Kähler differentials (Kahler differentials, Kaehler differentials).
This is implemented as `I / I ^ 2` with `I` the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
To view elements as a linear combination of the form `s • D s'`, use
`KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective` and `Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul`.
We also provide the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
-/
def KaehlerDifferential : Type v :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
#align kaehler_differential KaehlerDifferential
instance : AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential R S) := by
unfold KaehlerDifferential
infer_instance
instance KaehlerDifferential.module : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential R S) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.moduleOfTower _
#align kaehler_differential.module KaehlerDifferential.module
@[inherit_doc KaehlerDifferential]
notation:100 "Ω[" S "⁄" R "]" => KaehlerDifferential R S
instance : Nonempty (Ω[S⁄R]) := ⟨0⟩
instance KaehlerDifferential.module' {R' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [Algebra R' S]
[SMulCommClass R R' S] :
Module R' (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.module' _
#align kaehler_differential.module' KaehlerDifferential.module'
instance : IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.isScalarTower _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower {R₁ R₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂]
[Algebra R₁ S] [Algebra R₂ S] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[SMulCommClass R R₁ S] [SMulCommClass R R₂ S] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ S] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
#align kaehler_differential.is_scalar_tower_of_tower KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower' : IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
#align kaehler_differential.is_scalar_tower' KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower'
/-- The quotient map `I → Ω[S⁄R]` with `I` being the kernel of `S ⊗[R] S → S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S →ₗ[S ⊗[R] S] Ω[S⁄R] :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
#align kaehler_differential.from_ideal KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal
/-- (Implementation) The underlying linear map of the derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap : S →ₗ[R] Ω[S⁄R] :=
((KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal R S).restrictScalars R).comp
((TensorProduct.includeRight.toLinearMap - TensorProduct.includeLeft.toLinearMap :
S →ₗ[R] S ⊗[R] S).codRestrict
((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars R)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R) :
_ →ₗ[R] _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_linear_map KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap
theorem KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_linear_map_apply KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply
/-- The universal derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.D : Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
{ toLinearMap := KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S
map_one_eq_zero' := by
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply, Ideal.toCotangent_apply]
congr
rw [sub_self]
leibniz' := fun a b => by
have : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul { x // x ∈ ideal R S } (Ω[S⁄R]) S (S ⊗[R] S) := inferInstance
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (M₂ := Ω[S⁄R]),
← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (M₂ := Ω[S⁄R]), ← map_add, Ideal.toCotangent_eq, pow_two]
convert Submodule.mul_mem_mul (KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R a : _)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R b : _) using 1
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk,
TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_sub, sub_mul, mul_comm b, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower,
smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ring_nf }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D KaehlerDifferential.D
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.D R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_apply KaehlerDifferential.D_apply
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation :
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = ⊤ := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩ := Ideal.toCotangent_surjective _ x
have : x ∈ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := hx
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal] at this
suffices ∃ hx, (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) by
exact this.choose_spec
refine Submodule.span_induction this ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine ⟨KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x, ?_⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply R S x⟩
· exact ⟨zero_mem _, Submodule.zero_mem _⟩
· rintro x y ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; exact ⟨add_mem hx₁ hy₁, Submodule.add_mem _ hx₂ hy₂⟩
· rintro r x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩;
exact ⟨((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S).smul_mem r hx₁,
Submodule.smul_mem _ r hx₂⟩
#align kaehler_differential.span_range_derivation KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation
variable {R S}
/-- The linear map from `Ω[S⁄R]`, associated with a derivation. -/
def Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential (D : Derivation R S M) : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M := by
refine LinearMap.comp ((((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) •
(⊤ : Submodule (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S))).restrictScalars S).liftQ ?_ ?_)
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv S _).symm.toLinearMap
· exact D.tensorProductTo.comp ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).subtype.restrictScalars S)
· intro x hx
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on hx ?_ ?_
· rintro x hx y -
rw [RingHom.mem_ker] at hx
dsimp
rw [Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul, hx, y.prop, zero_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· intro x y ex ey; rw [map_add, ex, ey, zero_add]
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply (D : Derivation R S M) (x) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x) =
D.tensorProductTo x := rfl
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential_apply Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp (D : Derivation R S M) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = D := by
ext a
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.D_apply]
refine (D.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply _).trans ?_
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, map_sub, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul,
one_smul, D.map_one_eq_zero, smul_zero, sub_zero]
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential_comp Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp
@[simp]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp_D (D' : Derivation R S M) (x : S) :
D'.liftKaehlerDifferential (KaehlerDifferential.D R S x) = D' x :=
Derivation.congr_fun D'.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp x
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential_comp_D Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp_D
@[ext]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique (f f' : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M)
(hf : f.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = f'.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) :
f = f' := by
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
have : x ∈ Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) := by
rw [KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation]; trivial
refine Submodule.span_induction this ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact congr_arg (fun D : Derivation R S M => D x) hf
· rw [map_zero, map_zero]
· intro x y hx hy; rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
· intro a x e; simp [e]
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential_unique Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique
variable (R S)
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential = LinearMap.id :=
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential_comp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align derivation.lift_kaehler_differential_D Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D
variable {R S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo (x : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).tensorProductTo x =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x := by
rw [← Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply, Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align kaehler_differential.D_tensor_product_to KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo
variable (R S)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective :
Function.Surjective (KaehlerDifferential.D R S).tensorProductTo := by
intro x; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent_surjective x
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo x⟩
#align kaehler_differential.tensor_product_to_surjective KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective
/-- The `S`-linear maps from `Ω[S⁄R]` to `M` are (`S`-linearly) equivalent to `R`-derivations
from `S` to `M`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply apply_apply]
def KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation : (Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M) ≃ₗ[S] Derivation R S M :=
{ Derivation.llcomp.flip <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S with
invFun := Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential
left_inv := fun _ =>
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _ (Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp _)
right_inv := Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp }
#align kaehler_differential.linear_map_equiv_derivation KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation
/-- The quotient ring of `S ⊗ S ⧸ J ^ 2` by `Ω[S⁄R]` is isomorphic to `S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv :
(S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) ⧸ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal ≃+*
S := by
have : Function.RightInverse (TensorProduct.includeLeft (R := R) (S := R) (A := S) (B := S))
(↑(TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S) : S ⊗[R] S →+* S) := by
intro x; rw [AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, ← AlgHom.comp_apply, TensorProduct.lmul'_comp_includeLeft]
rfl
refine (Ideal.quotCotangent _).trans ?_
refine (Ideal.quotEquivOfEq ?_).trans (RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse this)
ext; rfl
#align kaehler_differential.quotient_cotangent_ideal_ring_equiv KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv
/-- The quotient ring of `S ⊗ S ⧸ J ^ 2` by `Ω[S⁄R]` is isomorphic to `S` as an `S`-algebra. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdeal :
((S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) ⧸
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal) ≃ₐ[S] S :=
{ KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S with
commutes' := (KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S).apply_symm_apply }
#align kaehler_differential.quotient_cotangent_ideal KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdeal
theorem KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux (f : S →ₐ[R] S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal).comp f =
IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ ↔
(TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S := by
rw [AlgHom.ext_iff, AlgHom.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro x
have e₁ : (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift (f x) =
KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal <| f x) := by
generalize f x = y; obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y; rfl
have e₂ :
x = KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ x) :=
(mul_one x).symm
constructor
· intro e
exact (e₁.trans (@RingEquiv.congr_arg _ _ _ _ _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S) _ _ e)).trans e₂.symm
· intro e; apply (KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S).injective
exact e₁.symm.trans (e.trans e₂)
#align kaehler_differential.End_equiv_aux KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux
/- Note: Lean is slow to synthesize theses instances (times out).
Without them the endEquivDerivation' and endEquivAuxEquiv both have significant timeouts.
In Mathlib 3, it was slow but not this slow. -/
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance smul_SSmod_SSmod : SMul (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Mul.toSMul _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_S_right :
IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_R_right :
IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_SS_right : IsScalarTower (S ⊗[R] S)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instS : Module S (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instR : Module R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instSS : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- Derivations into `Ω[S⁄R]` is equivalent to derivations
into `(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal`. -/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation' :
Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) ≃ₗ[R] Derivation R S (ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
LinearEquiv.compDer ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentEquivIdeal.restrictScalars S)
#align kaehler_differential.End_equiv_derivation' KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation'
/-- (Implementation) An `Equiv` version of `KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux`.
Used in `KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv :
{ f //
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal).comp f =
IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ } ≃
{ f // (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S } :=
(Equiv.refl _).subtypeEquiv (KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux R S)
#align kaehler_differential.End_equiv_aux_equiv KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv
/--
The endomorphisms of `Ω[S⁄R]` corresponds to sections of the surjection `S ⊗[R] S ⧸ J ^ 2 →ₐ[R] S`,
with `J` being the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
-/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv :
Module.End S (Ω[S⁄R]) ≃
{ f // (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S } :=
(KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation R S).toEquiv.trans <|
(KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation' R S).toEquiv.trans <|
(derivationToSquareZeroEquivLift (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal_square).trans <|
KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv R S
#align kaehler_differential.End_equiv KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv
section Presentation
open KaehlerDifferential (D)
open Finsupp (single)
/-- The `S`-submodule of `S →₀ S` (the direct sum of copies of `S` indexed by `S`) generated by
the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
where `db` is the unit in the copy of `S` with index `b`.
This is the kernel of the surjection `Finsupp.total S Ω[S⁄R] S (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)`.
See `KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_eq` and `KaehlerDifferential.total_surjective`.
-/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal : Submodule S (S →₀ S) :=
Submodule.span S
(((Set.range fun x : S × S => single x.1 1 + single x.2 1 - single (x.1 + x.2) 1) ∪
Set.range fun x : S × S => single x.2 x.1 + single x.1 x.2 - single (x.1 * x.2) 1) ∪
Set.range fun x : R => single (algebraMap R S x) 1)
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal
unsuppress_compilation in
-- Porting note: was `local notation x "𝖣" y => (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).mkQ (single y x)`
-- but not having `DFunLike.coe` leads to `kerTotal_mkQ_single_smul` failing.
local notation3 x "𝖣" y => DFunLike.coe (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).mkQ (single y x)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_add (x y z) : (z𝖣x + y) = (z𝖣x) + z𝖣y := by
rw [← map_add, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub (Submodule.mkQ (kerTotal R S)),
Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero]
simp_rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ z, ← smul_add, ← smul_sub]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inl <| Or.inl <| ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩))
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total_mkq_single_add KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_add
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_mul (x y z) :
(z𝖣x * y) = ((z * x)𝖣y) + (z * y)𝖣x := by
rw [← map_add, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub (Submodule.mkQ (kerTotal R S)),
Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero]
simp_rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ z, ← @smul_eq_mul _ _ z, ← Finsupp.smul_single, ← smul_add,
← smul_sub]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inl <| Or.inr <| ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩))
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total_mkq_single_mul KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_mul
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap (x y) : (y𝖣algebraMap R S x) = 0 := by
rw [Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ y]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inr <| ⟨_, rfl⟩))
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total_mkq_single_algebra_map KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap_one (x) : (x𝖣1) = 0 := by
rw [← (algebraMap R S).map_one, KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap]
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total_mkq_single_algebra_map_one KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap_one
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_smul (r : R) (x y) : (y𝖣r • x) = r • y𝖣x := by
letI : SMulZeroClass R S := inferInstance
rw [Algebra.smul_def, KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_mul,
KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap, add_zero, ← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower,
Finsupp.smul_single, mul_comm, Algebra.smul_def]
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total_mkq_single_smul KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_smul
/-- The (universal) derivation into `(S →₀ S) ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S`. -/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal :
Derivation R S ((S →₀ S) ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S) where
toFun x := 1𝖣x
map_add' x y := KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_add _ _ _ _ _
map_smul' r s := KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_smul _ _ _ _ _
map_one_eq_zero' := KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap_one _ _ _
leibniz' a b :=
(KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_mul _ _ _ _ _).trans
(by simp_rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ (1 * _ : S)]; dsimp; simp)
#align kaehler_differential.derivation_quot_ker_total KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal
theorem KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal_apply (x) :
KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal R S x = 1𝖣x :=
rfl
#align kaehler_differential.derivation_quot_ker_total_apply KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal_apply
theorem KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal_lift_comp_total :
(KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal R S).liftKaehlerDifferential.comp
(Finsupp.total S (Ω[S⁄R]) S (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) =
Submodule.mkQ _ := by
apply Finsupp.lhom_ext
intro a b
conv_rhs => rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one a b, LinearMap.map_smul]
simp [KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal_apply]
#align kaehler_differential.derivation_quot_ker_total_lift_comp_total KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal_lift_comp_total
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_eq :
LinearMap.ker (Finsupp.total S (Ω[S⁄R]) S (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) =
KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S := by
apply le_antisymm
· conv_rhs => rw [← (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).ker_mkQ]
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.derivationQuotKerTotal_lift_comp_total]
exact LinearMap.ker_le_ker_comp _ _
· rw [KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal, Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ((⟨⟨x, y⟩, rfl⟩ | ⟨⟨x, y⟩, rfl⟩) | ⟨x, rfl⟩) <;> dsimp <;> simp [LinearMap.mem_ker]
#align kaehler_differential.ker_total_eq KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_eq
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Kaehler.lean | 565 | 567 | theorem KaehlerDifferential.total_surjective :
Function.Surjective (Finsupp.total S (Ω[S⁄R]) S (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) := by |
rw [← LinearMap.range_eq_top, Finsupp.range_total, KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Mario Carneiro, Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import category_theory.limits.has_limits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2738d2ca56cbc63be80c3bd48e9ed90ad94e947d"
/-!
# Existence of limits and colimits
In `CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit` we defined `IsLimit c`,
the data showing that a cone `c` is a limit cone.
The two main structures defined in this file are:
* `LimitCone F`, which consists of a choice of cone for `F` and the fact it is a limit cone, and
* `HasLimit F`, asserting the mere existence of some limit cone for `F`.
`HasLimit` is a propositional typeclass
(it's important that it is a proposition merely asserting the existence of a limit,
as otherwise we would have non-defeq problems from incompatible instances).
While `HasLimit` only asserts the existence of a limit cone,
we happily use the axiom of choice in mathlib,
so there are convenience functions all depending on `HasLimit F`:
* `limit F : C`, producing some limit object (of course all such are isomorphic)
* `limit.π F j : limit F ⟶ F.obj j`, the morphisms out of the limit,
* `limit.lift F c : c.pt ⟶ limit F`, the universal morphism from any other `c : Cone F`, etc.
Key to using the `HasLimit` interface is that there is an `@[ext]` lemma stating that
to check `f = g`, for `f g : Z ⟶ limit F`, it suffices to check `f ≫ limit.π F j = g ≫ limit.π F j`
for every `j`.
This, combined with `@[simp]` lemmas, makes it possible to prove many easy facts about limits using
automation (e.g. `tidy`).
There are abbreviations `HasLimitsOfShape J C` and `HasLimits C`
asserting the existence of classes of limits.
Later more are introduced, for finite limits, special shapes of limits, etc.
Ideally, many results about limits should be stated first in terms of `IsLimit`,
and then a result in terms of `HasLimit` derived from this.
At this point, however, this is far from uniformly achieved in mathlib ---
often statements are only written in terms of `HasLimit`.
## Implementation
At present we simply say everything twice, in order to handle both limits and colimits.
It would be highly desirable to have some automation support,
e.g. a `@[dualize]` attribute that behaves similarly to `@[to_additive]`.
## References
* [Stacks: Limits and colimits](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/002D)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
/-- `LimitCone F` contains a cone over `F` together with the information that it is a limit. -/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): removed; linter not ported yet
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cone itself -/
cone : Cone F
/-- The proof that is the limit cone -/
isLimit : IsLimit cone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitCone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_cone.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitCone.isLimit
/-- `HasLimit F` represents the mere existence of a limit for `F`. -/
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There is some limit cone for `F` -/
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.mk
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `LimitCone F` from `HasLimit F`. -/
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
#align category_theory.limits.get_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.getLimitCone
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has limits of shape `J` if there exists a limit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from `J` have limits -/
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimitsOfShape
/-- `C` has all limits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has limits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All functors `F : J ⥤ C` from all small `J` have limits -/
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_size CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimitsOfSize
/-- `C` has all (small) limits if it has limits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets. -/
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits.has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit cone for a functor. -/
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone
/-- An arbitrary choice of limit object of a functor. -/
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
#align category_theory.limits.limit CategoryTheory.Limits.limit
/-- The projection from the limit object to a value of the functor. -/
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
#align category_theory.limits.limit.π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.π
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone_x
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
#align category_theory.limits.limit.w CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.w
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cone provided by `limit.cone F` is a limit cone. -/
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isLimit
/-- The morphism from the cone point of any other cone to the limit object. -/
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.is_limit_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isLimit_lift
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_π
/-- Functoriality of limits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `lim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified limits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_π
/-- The cone morphism from any cone to the arbitrary choice of limit cone. -/
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism_hom
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.existsUnique
/-- Given any other limit cone for `F`, the chosen `limit F` is isomorphic to the cone point.
-/
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.hom_ext
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_map
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_cone
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso_hom
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from a specified object `W` to the limit object,
and an explicit componentwise description of cones with cone point `W`.
-/
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso' CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso'
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_extend CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_extend
/-- If a functor `F` has a limit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfIso
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cones as a functor `F`
which has a limit, then `G` also has a limit. -/
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.of_cones_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.ofConesIso
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.lift_iso_of_nat_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.lift_iso_of_nat_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv
/-- The limits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π
section Pre
variable (F) [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the limit of `F` to the limit of `E ⋙ F`.
-/
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_π
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by ext; simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_pre
variable {L : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} L]
variable (D : L ⥤ K) [HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)]
@[simp]
theorem limit.pre_pre [h : HasLimit (D ⋙ E ⋙ F)] : haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h;
limit.pre F E ≫ limit.pre (E ⋙ F) D = limit.pre F (D ⋙ E) := by
haveI : HasLimit ((D ⋙ E) ⋙ F) := h
ext j; erw [assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π, limit.pre_π]; rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_pre
variable {E F}
/-- -
If we have particular limit cones available for `E ⋙ F` and for `F`,
we obtain a formula for `limit.pre F E`.
-/
theorem limit.pre_eq (s : LimitCone (E ⋙ F)) (t : LimitCone F) :
limit.pre F E = (limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ s.isLimit.lift (t.cone.whisker E) ≫
(limit.isoLimitCone s).inv := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_eq CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_eq
end Pre
section Post
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
variable (F) [HasLimit F] (G : C ⥤ D) [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
/-- The canonical morphism from `G` applied to the limit of `F` to the limit of `F ⋙ G`.
-/
def limit.post : G.obj (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ G) :=
limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone (limit.cone F))
#align category_theory.limits.limit.post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.post
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.post_π (j : J) : limit.post F G ≫ limit.π (F ⋙ G) j = G.map (limit.π F j) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.post_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.post_π
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_post (c : Cone F) :
G.map (limit.lift F c) ≫ limit.post F G = limit.lift (F ⋙ G) (G.mapCone c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.lift_π, limit.lift_π]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_post
@[simp]
theorem limit.post_post {E : Type u''} [Category.{v''} E] (H : D ⥤ E) [h : HasLimit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H)] :
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ H (limit (F ⋙ G)) ⟶ limit ((F ⋙ G) ⋙ H) equals
-- H G (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ (G ⋙ H))
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
H.map (limit.post F G) ≫ limit.post (F ⋙ G) H = limit.post F (G ⋙ H) := by
haveI : HasLimit (F ⋙ G ⋙ H) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp, limit.post_π, limit.post_π]; rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.post_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.post_post
end Post
theorem limit.pre_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] (E : K ⥤ J) (F : J ⥤ C) (G : C ⥤ D)
[HasLimit F] [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)] [HasLimit (F ⋙ G)]
[h : HasLimit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G)] :-- G (limit F) ⟶ G (limit (E ⋙ F)) ⟶ limit ((E ⋙ F) ⋙ G) vs
-- G (limit F) ⟶ limit F ⋙ G ⟶ limit (E ⋙ (F ⋙ G)) or
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
G.map (limit.pre F E) ≫ limit.post (E ⋙ F) G = limit.post F G ≫ limit.pre (F ⋙ G) E := by
haveI : HasLimit (E ⋙ F ⋙ G) := h
ext; erw [assoc, limit.post_π, ← G.map_comp, limit.pre_π, assoc, limit.pre_π, limit.post_π]
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_post
open CategoryTheory.Equivalence
instance hasLimitEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F) :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := Cone.whisker e.functor (limit.cone F)
isLimit := IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) e }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_equivalence_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp
-- Porting note: testing whether this still needed
-- attribute [local elab_without_expected_type] inv_fun_id_assoc
-- not entirely sure why this is needed
/-- If a `E ⋙ F` has a limit, and `E` is an equivalence, we can construct a limit of `F`.
-/
theorem hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp (e : K ≌ J) [HasLimit (e.functor ⋙ F)] : HasLimit F := by
haveI : HasLimit (e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⋙ F) := Limits.hasLimitEquivalenceComp e.symm
apply hasLimitOfIso (e.invFunIdAssoc F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_equivalence_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp
-- `hasLimitCompEquivalence` and `hasLimitOfCompEquivalence`
-- are proved in `CategoryTheory/Adjunction/Limits.lean`.
section LimFunctor
variable [HasLimitsOfShape J C]
section
/-- `limit F` is functorial in `F`, when `C` has all limits of shape `J`. -/
@[simps]
def lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C where
obj F := limit F
map α := limMap α
map_id F := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
erw [limMap_π, Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id]
map_comp α β := by
apply Limits.limit.hom_ext; intro j
erw [assoc, IsLimit.fac, IsLimit.fac, ← assoc, IsLimit.fac, assoc]; rfl
#align category_theory.limits.lim CategoryTheory.Limits.lim
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_eq_lim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.lim_map
end
variable {G : J ⥤ C} (α : F ⟶ G)
theorem limit.map_pre [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (E : K ⥤ J) :
lim.map α ≫ limit.pre G E = limit.pre F E ≫ lim.map (whiskerLeft E α) := by
ext
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.map_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.map_pre
theorem limit.map_pre' [HasLimitsOfShape K C] (F : J ⥤ C) {E₁ E₂ : K ⥤ J} (α : E₁ ⟶ E₂) :
limit.pre F E₂ = limit.pre F E₁ ≫ lim.map (whiskerRight α F) := by
ext1; simp [← category.assoc]
#align category_theory.limits.limit.map_pre' CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.map_pre'
theorem limit.id_pre (F : J ⥤ C) : limit.pre F (𝟭 _) = lim.map (Functor.leftUnitor F).inv := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.id_pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.id_pre
theorem limit.map_post {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D] [HasLimitsOfShape J D] (H : C ⥤ D) :
/- H (limit F) ⟶ H (limit G) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) vs
H (limit F) ⟶ limit (F ⋙ H) ⟶ limit (G ⋙ H) -/
H.map (limMap α) ≫ limit.post G H = limit.post F H ≫ limMap (whiskerRight α H) := by
ext
simp only [whiskerRight_app, limMap_π, assoc, limit.post_π_assoc, limit.post_π, ← H.map_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.limit.map_post CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.map_post
/-- The isomorphism between
morphisms from `W` to the cone point of the limit cone for `F`
and cones over `F` with cone point `W`
is natural in `F`.
-/
def limYoneda :
lim ⋙ yoneda ⋙ (whiskeringRight _ _ _).obj uliftFunctor.{u₁} ≅ CategoryTheory.cones J C :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun F => NatIso.ofComponents fun W => limit.homIso F (unop W)
#align category_theory.limits.lim_yoneda CategoryTheory.Limits.limYoneda
/-- The constant functor and limit functor are adjoint to each other-/
def constLimAdj : (const J : C ⥤ J ⥤ C) ⊣ lim where
homEquiv c g :=
{ toFun := fun f => limit.lift _ ⟨c, f⟩
invFun := fun f =>
{ app := fun j => f ≫ limit.π _ _ }
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat }
unit := { app := fun c => limit.lift _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _⟩ }
counit := { app := fun g => { app := limit.π _ } }
-- This used to be automatic before leanprover/lean4#2644
homEquiv_unit := by
-- Sad that aesop can no longer do this!
intros
dsimp
ext
simp
#align category_theory.limits.const_lim_adj CategoryTheory.Limits.constLimAdj
instance : IsRightAdjoint (lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C) :=
⟨_, ⟨constLimAdj⟩⟩
end LimFunctor
instance limMap_mono' {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimitsOfShape J C] (α : F ⟶ G) [Mono α] : Mono (limMap α) :=
(lim : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C).map_mono α
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_mono' CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_mono'
instance limMap_mono {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) [∀ j, Mono (α.app j)] :
Mono (limMap α) :=
⟨fun {Z} u v h =>
limit.hom_ext fun j => (cancel_mono (α.app j)).1 <| by simpa using h =≫ limit.π _ j⟩
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_mono CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_mono
section Adjunction
variable {L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C} (adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ L)
/- The fact that the existence of limits of shape `J` is equivalent to the existence
of a right adjoint to the constant functor `C ⥤ (J ⥤ C)` is obtained in
the file `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeCategory`: see the lemma
`hasLimitsOfShape_iff_isLeftAdjoint_const`. In the definitions below, given an
adjunction `adj : Functor.const _ ⊣ (L : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ C)`, we directly construct
a limit cone for any `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
/-- The limit cone obtained from a right adjoint of the constant functor. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coneOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) : Cone F where
pt := L.obj F
π := adj.counit.app F
/-- The cones defined by `coneOfAdj` are limit cones. -/
@[simps]
def isLimitConeOfAdj (F : J ⥤ C) :
IsLimit (coneOfAdj adj F) where
lift s := adj.homEquiv _ _ s.π
fac s j := by
have eq := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.counit.naturality s.π) j
have eq' := NatTrans.congr_app (adj.left_triangle_components s.pt) j
dsimp at eq eq' ⊢
rw [Adjunction.homEquiv_unit, assoc, eq, reassoc_of% eq']
uniq s m hm := (adj.homEquiv _ _).symm.injective (by ext j; simpa using hm j)
end Adjunction
/-- We can transport limits of shape `J` along an equivalence `J ≌ J'`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence {J' : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} J'] (e : J ≌ J')
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] : HasLimitsOfShape J' C := by
constructor
intro F
apply hasLimitOfEquivalenceComp e
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_equivalence CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence
variable (C)
/-- A category that has larger limits also has smaller limits. -/
theorem hasLimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE [UnivLE.{v₂, v₁}] [UnivLE.{u₂, u₁}]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfSize.{v₂, u₂} C where
has_limits_of_shape J {_} := hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence
((ShrinkHoms.equivalence J).trans <| Shrink.equivalence _).symm
/-- `hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{v u} C` tries to obtain `HasLimitsOfSize.{v u} C`
from some other `HasLimitsOfSize C`.
-/
theorem hasLimitsOfSizeShrink [HasLimitsOfSize.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C] :
HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C := hasLimitsOfSizeOfUnivLE.{max v₁ v₂, max u₁ u₂} C
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_size_shrink CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfSizeShrink
instance (priority := 100) hasSmallestLimitsOfHasLimits [HasLimits C] : HasLimitsOfSize.{0, 0} C :=
hasLimitsOfSizeShrink.{0, 0} C
#align category_theory.limits.has_smallest_limits_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasSmallestLimitsOfHasLimits
end Limit
section Colimit
/-- `ColimitCocone F` contains a cocone over `F` together with the information that it is a
colimit. -/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): removed; linter not ported yet
structure ColimitCocone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- The cocone itself -/
cocone : Cocone F
/-- The proof that it is the colimit cocone -/
isColimit : IsColimit cocone
#align category_theory.limits.colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.ColimitCocone
#align category_theory.limits.colimit_cocone.is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.ColimitCocone.isColimit
/-- `HasColimit F` represents the mere existence of a colimit for `F`. -/
class HasColimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
/-- There exists a colimit for `F` -/
exists_colimit : Nonempty (ColimitCocone F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit
theorem HasColimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : ColimitCocone F) : HasColimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.mk
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `ColimitCocone F` from `HasColimit F`. -/
def getColimitCocone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : ColimitCocone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasColimit.exists_colimit
#align category_theory.limits.get_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.getColimitCocone
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has colimits of shape `J` if there exists a colimit for every functor `F : J ⥤ C`. -/
class HasColimitsOfShape : Prop where
/-- All `F : J ⥤ C` have colimits for a fixed `J` -/
has_colimit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasColimit F := by infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimitsOfShape
/-- `C` has all colimits of size `v₁ u₁` (`HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁ u₁} C`)
if it has colimits of every shape `J : Type u₁` with `[Category.{v₁} J]`.
-/
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasColimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
/-- All `F : J ⥤ C` have colimits for all small `J` -/
has_colimits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasColimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_size CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimitsOfSize
/-- `C` has all (small) colimits if it has colimits of every shape that is as big as its hom-sets.
-/
abbrev HasColimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasColimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimits
theorem HasColimits.hasColimitsOfShape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasColimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
HasColimitsOfSize.has_colimits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits.has_colimits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimits.hasColimitsOfShape
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasColimitOfHasColimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasColimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasColimit F :=
HasColimitsOfShape.has_colimit F
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_has_colimits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitOfHasColimitsOfShape
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasColimitsOfShapeOfHasColimitsOfSize {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasColimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasColimitsOfShape J C :=
HasColimitsOfSize.has_colimits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimits_of_shape_of_has_colimits_of_size CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitsOfShapeOfHasColimitsOfSize
-- Interface to the `HasColimit` class.
/-- An arbitrary choice of colimit cocone of a functor. -/
def colimit.cocone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : Cocone F :=
(getColimitCocone F).cocone
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.cocone
/-- An arbitrary choice of colimit object of a functor. -/
def colimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] :=
(colimit.cocone F).pt
#align category_theory.limits.colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit
/-- The coprojection from a value of the functor to the colimit object. -/
def colimit.ι (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (j : J) : F.obj j ⟶ colimit F :=
(colimit.cocone F).ι.app j
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.ι CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.ι
@[simp]
theorem colimit.cocone_ι {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (j : J) :
(colimit.cocone F).ι.app j = colimit.ι _ j :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.cocone_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.cocone_ι
@[simp]
theorem colimit.cocone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] : (colimit.cocone F).pt = colimit F :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.cocone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.cocone_x
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f ≫ colimit.ι F j' = colimit.ι F j :=
(colimit.cocone F).w f
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.w CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.w
/-- Evidence that the arbitrary choice of cocone is a colimit cocone. -/
def colimit.isColimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] : IsColimit (colimit.cocone F) :=
(getColimitCocone F).isColimit
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.isColimit
/-- The morphism from the colimit object to the cone point of any other cocone. -/
def colimit.desc (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) : colimit F ⟶ c.pt :=
(colimit.isColimit F).desc c
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.desc
@[simp]
theorem colimit.isColimit_desc {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) :
(colimit.isColimit F).desc c = colimit.desc F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.is_colimit_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.isColimit_desc
/-- We have lots of lemmas describing how to simplify `colimit.ι F j ≫ _`,
and combined with `colimit.ext` we rely on these lemmas for many calculations.
However, since `Category.assoc` is a `@[simp]` lemma, often expressions are
right associated, and it's hard to apply these lemmas about `colimit.ι`.
We thus use `reassoc` to define additional `@[simp]` lemmas, with an arbitrary extra morphism.
(see `Tactic/reassoc_axiom.lean`)
-/
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.ι_desc {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ colimit.desc F c = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.fac _ c j
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.ι_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.ι_desc
/-- Functoriality of colimits.
Usually this morphism should be accessed through `colim.map`,
but may be needed separately when you have specified colimits for the source and target functors,
but not necessarily for all functors of shape `J`.
-/
def colimMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : colimit F ⟶ colimit G :=
IsColimit.map (colimit.isColimit F) _ α
#align category_theory.limits.colim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.colimMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ι_colimMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ colimMap α = α.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j :=
colimit.ι_desc _ j
#align category_theory.limits.ι_colim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.ι_colimMap
/-- The cocone morphism from the arbitrary choice of colimit cocone to any cocone. -/
def colimit.coconeMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) : colimit.cocone F ⟶ c :=
(colimit.isColimit F).descCoconeMorphism c
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.cocone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.coconeMorphism
@[simp]
theorem colimit.coconeMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) :
(colimit.coconeMorphism c).hom = colimit.desc F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.cocone_morphism_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.coconeMorphism_hom
theorem colimit.ι_coconeMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (colimit.coconeMorphism c).hom = c.ι.app j := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.ι_cocone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.ι_coconeMorphism
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {c : Cocone F}
(hc : IsColimit c) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _) hc).hom = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.comp_cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {c : Cocone F}
(hc : IsColimit c) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc (colimit.isColimit _)).inv = c.ι.app j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.comp_cocone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_inv
theorem colimit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : Cocone F) :
∃! d : colimit F ⟶ t.pt, ∀ j, colimit.ι F j ≫ d = t.ι.app j :=
(colimit.isColimit F).existsUnique _
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.existsUnique
/--
Given any other colimit cocone for `F`, the chosen `colimit F` is isomorphic to the cocone point.
-/
def colimit.isoColimitCocone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) :
colimit F ≅ t.cocone.pt :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit F) t.isColimit
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.iso_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.isoColimitCocone
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).hom = t.cocone.ι.app j := by
dsimp [colimit.isoColimitCocone, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.iso_colimit_cocone_ι_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_inv {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (t : ColimitCocone F) (j : J) :
t.cocone.ι.app j ≫ (colimit.isoColimitCocone t).inv = colimit.ι F j := by
dsimp [colimit.isoColimitCocone, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.iso_colimit_cocone_ι_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.isoColimitCocone_ι_inv
@[ext]
theorem colimit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {X : C} {f f' : colimit F ⟶ X}
(w : ∀ j, colimit.ι F j ≫ f = colimit.ι F j ≫ f') : f = f' :=
(colimit.isColimit F).hom_ext w
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.hom_ext
@[simp]
theorem colimit.desc_cocone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] :
colimit.desc F (colimit.cocone F) = 𝟙 (colimit F) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).desc_self
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.desc_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.desc_cocone
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from the colimit object to a specified object `W`,
and cocones with cone point `W`.
-/
def colimit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (colimit F ⟶ W : Type v) ≅ F.cocones.obj W :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso W
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.homIso
@[simp]
theorem colimit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (colimit F ⟶ W)) :
(colimit.homIso F W).hom f = (colimit.cocone F).ι ≫ (const J).map f.down :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso_hom f
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.hom_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.homIso_hom
/-- The isomorphism (in `Type`) between
morphisms from the colimit object to a specified object `W`,
and an explicit componentwise description of cocones with cone point `W`.
-/
def colimit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (colimit F ⟶ W : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, F.obj j ⟶ W // ∀ {j j'} (f : j ⟶ j'), F.map f ≫ p j' = p j } :=
(colimit.isColimit F).homIso' W
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.hom_iso' CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.homIso'
theorem colimit.desc_extend (F : J ⥤ C) [HasColimit F] (c : Cocone F) {X : C} (f : c.pt ⟶ X) :
colimit.desc F (c.extend f) = colimit.desc F c ≫ f := by ext1; rw [← Category.assoc]; simp
#align category_theory.limits.colimit.desc_extend CategoryTheory.Limits.colimit.desc_extend
-- This has the isomorphism pointing in the opposite direction than in `has_limit_of_iso`.
-- This is intentional; it seems to help with elaboration.
/-- If `F` has a colimit, so does any naturally isomorphic functor.
-/
theorem hasColimitOfIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] (α : G ≅ F) : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (Cocones.precompose α.hom).obj (colimit.cocone F)
isColimit := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (colimit.isColimit F) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit_of_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasColimitOfIso
/-- If a functor `G` has the same collection of cocones as a functor `F`
which has a colimit, then `G` also has a colimit. -/
theorem HasColimit.ofCoconesIso {K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C) (G : K ⥤ C)
(h : F.cocones ≅ G.cocones) [HasColimit F] : HasColimit G :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, IsColimit.ofNatIso (IsColimit.natIso (colimit.isColimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.of_cocones_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.ofCoconesIso
/-- The colimits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : J ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if the functors are naturally isomorphic.
-/
def HasColimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G) :
colimit F ≅ colimit G :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso (colimit.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit G) w
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfNatIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G)
(j : J) : colimit.ι F j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom = w.hom.app j ≫ colimit.ι G j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso_ι_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (w : F ≅ G)
(j : J) : colimit.ι G j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv = w.inv.app j ≫ colimit.ι F j :=
IsColimit.comp_coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso_ι_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_ι_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_desc {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (t : Cocone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ colimit.desc G t =
colimit.desc F ((Cocones.precompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso_hom_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_desc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_desc {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] [HasColimit G] (t : Cocone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
(HasColimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ colimit.desc F t =
colimit.desc G ((Cocones.precompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_desc _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_nat_iso_inv_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_desc
/-- The colimits of `F : J ⥤ C` and `G : K ⥤ C` are isomorphic,
if there is an equivalence `e : J ≌ K` making the triangle commute up to natural isomorphism.
-/
def HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : colimit F ≅ colimit G :=
IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence (colimit.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit G) e w
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_equivalence CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence
@[simp]
theorem HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
colimit.ι F j ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom =
F.map (e.unit.app j) ≫ w.inv.app _ ≫ colimit.ι G _ := by
simp [HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence_inv]
#align category_theory.limits.has_colimit.iso_of_equivalence_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 976 | 980 | theorem HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasColimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasColimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
colimit.ι G k ≫ (HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv =
G.map (e.counitInv.app k) ≫ w.hom.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ colimit.ι F (e.inverse.obj k) := by |
simp [HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsColimit.coconePointsIsoOfEquivalence_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Monotone g) : iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a :=
iSup_add_iSup fun i j => ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add (hf <| le_sup_left) (hg <| le_sup_right)⟩
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_of_monotone ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone
theorem finset_sum_iSup_nat {α} {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) : (∑ a ∈ s, iSup (f a)) = ⨆ n, ∑ a ∈ s, f a n := by
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a s has ih
simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [ih, iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone (hf a)]
intro i j h
exact Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => hf a h
#align ennreal.finset_sum_supr_nat ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat
theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * iSup f = ⨆ i, a * f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· obtain rfl : f = fun _ => 0 := funext hf
simp only [iSup_zero_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· refine (monotone_id.const_mul' _).map_iSup_of_continuousAt ?_ (mul_zero a)
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id (Or.inl ?_)
exact mt iSup_eq_zero.1 hf
#align ennreal.mul_supr ENNReal.mul_iSup
theorem mul_sSup {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, a * i := by
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup, mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.mul_Sup ENNReal.mul_sSup
theorem iSup_mul {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f * a = ⨆ i, f i * a := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_iSup]; congr; funext; rw [mul_comm]
#align ennreal.supr_mul ENNReal.iSup_mul
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (f : ι → ℝ≥0∞)
(c : R) : (c • ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, c • f i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `iSup _` with `iSup f`
simp only [← smul_one_mul c (f _), ← smul_one_mul c (iSup f), ENNReal.mul_iSup]
#align ennreal.smul_supr ENNReal.smul_iSup
theorem smul_sSup {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (s : Set ℝ≥0∞) (c : R) :
c • sSup s = ⨆ i ∈ s, c • i := by
-- Porting note: replaced `_` with `s`
simp_rw [← smul_one_mul c (sSup s), ENNReal.mul_sSup, smul_one_mul]
#align ennreal.smul_Sup ENNReal.smul_sSup
theorem iSup_div {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : iSup f / a = ⨆ i, f i / a :=
iSup_mul
#align ennreal.supr_div ENNReal.iSup_div
protected theorem tendsto_coe_sub {b : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun b : ℝ≥0∞ => ↑r - b) (𝓝 b) (𝓝 (↑r - b)) :=
continuous_nnreal_sub.tendsto _
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_sub ENNReal.tendsto_coe_sub
theorem sub_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] {b : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hr : a < ∞) :
(a - ⨆ i, b i) = ⨅ i, a - b i :=
antitone_const_tsub.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuous_sub_left hr.ne).continuousAt
#align ennreal.sub_supr ENNReal.sub_iSup
theorem exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ 0 ∉ s ∧ ∞ ∉ s := by
obtain ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, hs⟩ :
∃ s : Set ℝ≥0∞, s.Countable ∧ Dense s ∧ (∀ x, IsBot x → x ∉ s) ∧ ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∉ s :=
exists_countable_dense_no_bot_top ℝ≥0∞
exact ⟨s, s_count, s_dense, fun h => hs.1 0 (by simp) h, fun h => hs.2 ∞ (by simp) h⟩
#align ennreal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
theorem exists_lt_add_of_lt_add {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x < y + z) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
∃ y' z', y' < y ∧ z' < z ∧ x < y' + z' := by
have : NeZero y := ⟨hy⟩
have : NeZero z := ⟨hz⟩
have A : Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 + p.2) (𝓝[<] y ×ˢ 𝓝[<] z) (𝓝 (y + z)) := by
apply Tendsto.mono_left _ (Filter.prod_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
rw [← nhds_prod_eq]
exact tendsto_add
rcases ((A.eventually (lt_mem_nhds h)).and
(Filter.prod_mem_prod self_mem_nhdsWithin self_mem_nhdsWithin)).exists with
⟨⟨y', z'⟩, hx, hy', hz'⟩
exact ⟨y', z', hy', hz', hx⟩
#align ennreal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add ENNReal.exists_lt_add_of_lt_add
theorem ofReal_cinfi (f : α → ℝ) [Nonempty α] :
ENNReal.ofReal (⨅ i, f i) = ⨅ i, ENNReal.ofReal (f i) := by
by_cases hf : BddBelow (range f)
· exact
Monotone.map_ciInf_of_continuousAt ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
(fun i j hij => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hij) hf
· symm
rw [Real.iInf_of_not_bddBelow hf, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
obtain ⟨y, hy_mem, hy_neg⟩ := not_bddBelow_iff.mp hf 0
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := mem_range.mpr hy_mem
refine fun x hx => ⟨i, ?_⟩
rwa [ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hy_neg.le]
#align ennreal.of_real_cinfi ENNReal.ofReal_cinfi
end TopologicalSpace
section Liminf
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, x n < R := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h r] with i hi using hi.trans (le_abs_self (x i))
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top
theorem exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hx : liminf (fun n => (Real.nnabs (x n) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞) : ∃ R, ∃ᶠ n in l, R < x n := by
by_contra h
simp_rw [not_exists, not_frequently, not_lt] at h
refine hx (ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r => le_limsInf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) ?_)
simp only [eventually_map, ENNReal.coe_le_coe]
filter_upwards [h (-r)] with i hi using(le_neg.1 hi).trans (neg_le_abs _)
#align ennreal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' ENNReal.exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top'
theorem exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under {ι : Type*} {l : Filter ι} {x : ι → ℝ}
(hf : liminf (fun i => (Real.nnabs (x i) : ℝ≥0∞)) l ≠ ∞)
(hbdd : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun i => |x i|) :
∃ a b : ℚ, a < b ∧ (∃ᶠ i in l, x i < a) ∧ ∃ᶠ i in l, ↑b < x i := by
rw [isBoundedUnder_le_abs, not_and_or] at hbdd
obtain hbdd | hbdd := hbdd
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_gt R
refine ⟨q, q + 1, (lt_add_iff_pos_right _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le hq (not_lt.1 hx)).le
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q + 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := exists_frequently_lt_of_liminf_ne_top' hf
obtain ⟨q, hq⟩ := exists_rat_lt R
refine ⟨q - 1, q, (sub_lt_self_iff _).2 zero_lt_one, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map, eventually_atTop, ge_iff_le,
not_exists, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop] at hbdd
refine fun hcon => hbdd ↑(q - 1) ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.1 hx
· refine fun hcon => hR ?_
filter_upwards [hcon] with x hx using not_lt.2 ((not_lt.1 hx).trans hq.le)
#align ennreal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under ENNReal.exists_upcrossings_of_not_bounded_under
end Liminf
section tsum
variable {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
@[norm_cast]
protected theorem hasSum_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum (fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↑r ↔ HasSum f r := by
simp only [HasSum, ← coe_finset_sum, tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.has_sum_coe ENNReal.hasSum_coe
protected theorem tsum_coe_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0} (h : HasSum f r) : (∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = r :=
(ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 h).tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq
protected theorem coe_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0} : Summable f → ↑(tsum f) = ∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)
| ⟨r, hr⟩ => by rw [hr.tsum_eq, ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq hr]
#align ennreal.coe_tsum ENNReal.coe_tsum
protected theorem hasSum : HasSum f (⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a) :=
tendsto_atTop_iSup fun _ _ => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset
#align ennreal.has_sum ENNReal.hasSum
@[simp]
protected theorem summable : Summable f :=
⟨_, ENNReal.hasSum⟩
#align ennreal.summable ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable {f : β → ℝ≥0} : (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ENNReal.coe_tsum h ▸ ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩
lift ∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞) to ℝ≥0 using h with a ha
refine ⟨a, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 ?_⟩
rw [ha]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum : ∑' a, f a = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a :=
ENNReal.hasSum.tsum_eq
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : ι → Finset α) (hs : ∀ t, ∃ i, t ⊆ s i) :
∑' a, f a = ⨆ i, ∑ a ∈ s i, f a := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
symm
change ⨆ i : ι, (fun t : Finset α => ∑ a ∈ t, f a) (s i) = ⨆ s : Finset α, ∑ a ∈ s, f a
exact (Finset.sum_mono_set f).iSup_comp_eq hs
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_sum' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum'
protected theorem tsum_sigma {β : α → Type*} (f : ∀ a, β a → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma ENNReal.tsum_sigma
protected theorem tsum_sigma' {β : α → Type*} (f : (Σa, β a) → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' p : Σa, β a, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
tsum_sigma' (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_sigma' ENNReal.tsum_sigma'
protected theorem tsum_prod {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p.1 p.2 = ∑' (a) (b), f a b :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod ENNReal.tsum_prod
protected theorem tsum_prod' {f : α × β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' p : α × β, f p = ∑' (a) (b), f (a, b) :=
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_prod' ENNReal.tsum_prod'
protected theorem tsum_comm {f : α → β → ℝ≥0∞} : ∑' a, ∑' b, f a b = ∑' b, ∑' a, f a b :=
tsum_comm' ENNReal.summable (fun _ => ENNReal.summable) fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_comm ENNReal.tsum_comm
protected theorem tsum_add : ∑' a, (f a + g a) = ∑' a, f a + ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_add ENNReal.tsum_add
protected theorem tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : ∑' a, f a ≤ ∑' a, g a :=
tsum_le_tsum h ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_le_tsum ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum
@[gcongr]
protected theorem _root_.GCongr.ennreal_tsum_le_tsum (h : ∀ a, f a ≤ g a) : tsum f ≤ tsum g :=
ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum h
protected theorem sum_le_tsum {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (s : Finset α) : ∑ x ∈ s, f x ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
sum_le_tsum s (fun _ _ => zero_le _) ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.sum_le_tsum ENNReal.sum_le_tsum
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat' {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {N : ℕ → ℕ} (hN : Tendsto N atTop atTop) :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range (N i), f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ fun t =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := t.exists_nat_subset_range
let ⟨k, _, hk⟩ := exists_le_of_tendsto_atTop hN 0 n
⟨k, Finset.Subset.trans hn (Finset.range_mono hk)⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat' ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat'
protected theorem tsum_eq_iSup_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i : ℕ, f i = ⨆ i : ℕ, ∑ a ∈ Finset.range i, f a :=
ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum' _ Finset.exists_nat_subset_range
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_supr_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = liminf (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.liminf_eq.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat
protected theorem tsum_eq_limsup_sum_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} :
∑' i, f i = limsup (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop :=
ENNReal.summable.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat.limsup_eq.symm
protected theorem le_tsum (a : α) : f a ≤ ∑' a, f a :=
le_tsum' ENNReal.summable a
#align ennreal.le_tsum ENNReal.le_tsum
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_eq_zero : ∑' i, f i = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 :=
tsum_eq_zero_iff ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_zero ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero
protected theorem tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top : (∃ a, f a = ∞) → ∑' a, f a = ∞
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => top_unique <| ha ▸ ENNReal.le_tsum a
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top
protected theorem lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top {a : α → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞) (j : α) :
a j < ∞ := by
contrapose! tsum_ne_top with h
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨j, top_unique h⟩
#align ennreal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.lt_top_of_tsum_ne_top
@[simp]
protected theorem tsum_top [Nonempty α] : ∑' _ : α, ∞ = ∞ :=
let ⟨a⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align ennreal.tsum_top ENNReal.tsum_top
theorem tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero {α : Type*} [Infinite α] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
∑' _ : α, c = ∞ := by
have A : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c) atTop (𝓝 (∞ * c)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_nat_nhds_top
simp only [true_or_iff, top_ne_zero, Ne, not_false_iff]
have B : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : ℝ≥0∞) * c ≤ ∑' _ : α, c := fun n => by
rcases Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n with ⟨s, hs⟩
simpa [hs] using @ENNReal.sum_le_tsum α (fun _ => c) s
simpa [hc] using le_of_tendsto' A B
#align ennreal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ENNReal.tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero
protected theorem ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (h : ∑' a, f a ≠ ∞) (a : α) : f a ≠ ∞ := fun ha =>
h <| ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨a, ha⟩
#align ennreal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top
protected theorem tsum_mul_left : ∑' i, a * f i = a * ∑' i, f i := by
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· simp [hf]
· rw [← ENNReal.tsum_eq_zero] at hf
have : Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑ j ∈ s, a * f j) atTop (𝓝 (a * ∑' i, f i)) := by
simp only [← Finset.mul_sum]
exact ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.summable.hasSum (Or.inl hf)
exact HasSum.tsum_eq this
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_left ENNReal.tsum_mul_left
protected theorem tsum_mul_right : ∑' i, f i * a = (∑' i, f i) * a := by
simp [mul_comm, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left]
#align ennreal.tsum_mul_right ENNReal.tsum_mul_right
protected theorem tsum_const_smul {R} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (a : R) :
∑' i, a • f i = a • ∑' i, f i := by
simpa only [smul_one_mul] using @ENNReal.tsum_mul_left _ (a • (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) _
#align ennreal.tsum_const_smul ENNReal.tsum_const_smul
@[simp]
theorem tsum_iSup_eq {α : Type*} (a : α) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} : (∑' b : α, ⨆ _ : a = b, f b) = f a :=
(tsum_eq_single a fun _ h => by simp [h.symm]).trans <| by simp
#align ennreal.tsum_supr_eq ENNReal.tsum_iSup_eq
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
refine ⟨HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← iSup_eq_of_tendsto _ h, ← ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat]
· exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
· exact fun s t hst => Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset (Finset.range_subset.2 hst)
#align ennreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem tendsto_nat_tsum (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 (∑' n, f n)) := by
rw [← hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
exact ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_tsum ENNReal.tendsto_nat_tsum
theorem toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) (x : α) :
(((ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) = f x :=
coe_toNNReal <| ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf _
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Summable (ENNReal.toNNReal ∘ f) := by
simpa only [← tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, toNNReal_apply_of_tsum_ne_top hf] using hf
#align ennreal.summable_to_nnreal_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 0) := by
have f_ne_top : ∀ n, f n ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
have h_f_coe : f = fun n => ((f n).toNNReal : ENNReal) :=
funext fun n => (coe_toNNReal (f_ne_top n)).symm
rw [h_f_coe, ← @coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact NNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_summable (summable_toNNReal_of_tsum_ne_top hf)
#align ennreal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
theorem tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
exact tendsto_cofinite_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hf
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- The sum over the complement of a finset tends to `0` when the finset grows to cover the whole
space. This does not need a summability assumption, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero {α : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun s : Finset α => ∑' b : { x // x ∉ s }, f b) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
convert ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 (NNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero f)
rw [ENNReal.coe_tsum]
exact NNReal.summable_comp_injective (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf) Subtype.coe_injective
#align ennreal.tendsto_tsum_compl_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_tsum_compl_atTop_zero
protected theorem tsum_apply {ι α : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : α} :
(∑' i, f i) x = ∑' i, f i x :=
tsum_apply <| Pi.summable.mpr fun _ => ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_apply ENNReal.tsum_apply
theorem tsum_sub {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : ∑' i, g i ≠ ∞) (h₂ : g ≤ f) :
∑' i, (f i - g i) = ∑' i, f i - ∑' i, g i :=
have : ∀ i, f i - g i + g i = f i := fun i => tsub_add_cancel_of_le (h₂ i)
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h₁ <| by simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_add, this]
#align ennreal.tsum_sub ENNReal.tsum_sub
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' x, g (f x) ≤ ∑' y, g y :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj f hf (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable
ENNReal.summable
theorem tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) (g : β → ℝ≥0∞) :
∑' y, g y ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) :=
calc ∑' y, g y = ∑' y, g (f (surjInv hf y)) := by simp only [surjInv_eq hf]
_ ≤ ∑' x, g (f x) := tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf) _
theorem tsum_mono_subtype (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∑' x : s, f x ≤ ∑' x : t, f x :=
tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_injective (inclusion_injective h) _
#align ennreal.tsum_mono_subtype ENNReal.tsum_mono_subtype
theorem tsum_iUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑' x : Σ i, t i, f x.2 :=
tsum_le_tsum_comp_of_surjective (sigmaToiUnion_surjective t) _
_ = ∑' i, ∑' x : t i, f x := ENNReal.tsum_sigma' _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le_tsum {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s , t i, f x ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x = ∑' x : ⋃ i : s, t i, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ <| by simp
_ ≤ ∑' i : s, ∑' x : t i, f x := tsum_iUnion_le_tsum _ _
theorem tsum_biUnion_le {ι : Type*} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i ∈ s, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ∑' x : t i, f x :=
(tsum_biUnion_le_tsum f s.toSet t).trans_eq (Finset.tsum_subtype s fun i => ∑' x : t i, f x)
#align ennreal.tsum_bUnion_le ENNReal.tsum_biUnion_le
theorem tsum_iUnion_le {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (t : ι → Set α) :
∑' x : ⋃ i, t i, f x ≤ ∑ i, ∑' x : t i, f x := by
rw [← tsum_fintype]
exact tsum_iUnion_le_tsum f t
#align ennreal.tsum_Union_le ENNReal.tsum_iUnion_le
theorem tsum_union_le (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s t : Set α) :
∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x ≤ ∑' x : s, f x + ∑' x : t, f x :=
calc ∑' x : ↑(s ∪ t), f x = ∑' x : ⋃ b, cond b s t, f x := tsum_congr_set_coe _ union_eq_iUnion
_ ≤ _ := by simpa using tsum_iUnion_le f (cond · s t)
#align ennreal.tsum_union_le ENNReal.tsum_union_le
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} (b : β) :
∑' x, f x = f b + ∑' x, ite (x = b) 0 (f x) :=
tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' b ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite ENNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
theorem tsum_add_one_eq_top {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∑' n, f n = ∞) (hf0 : f 0 ≠ ∞) :
∑' n, f (n + 1) = ∞ := by
rw [tsum_eq_zero_add' ENNReal.summable, add_eq_top] at hf
exact hf.resolve_left hf0
#align ennreal.tsum_add_one_eq_top ENNReal.tsum_add_one_eq_top
/-- A sum of extended nonnegative reals which is finite can have only finitely many terms
above any positive threshold. -/
theorem finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (tsum_ne_top : ∑' i, a i ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite := by
by_contra h
have := Infinite.to_subtype h
refine tsum_ne_top (top_unique ?_)
calc ∞ = ∑' _ : { i | ε ≤ a i }, ε := (tsum_const_eq_top_of_ne_zero ε_ne_zero).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.val_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun i => i.2) ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable
#align ennreal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top ENNReal.finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top
/-- Markov's inequality for `Finset.card` and `tsum` in `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
theorem finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le {ι : Type*} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (c_ne_top : c ≠ ∞)
(tsum_le_c : ∑' i, a i ≤ c) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (ε_ne_zero : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite, ↑hf.toFinset.card ≤ c / ε := by
have hf : { i : ι | ε ≤ a i }.Finite :=
finite_const_le_of_tsum_ne_top (ne_top_of_le_ne_top c_ne_top tsum_le_c) ε_ne_zero
refine ⟨hf, (ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (.inl ε_ne_zero) (.inr c_ne_top)).2 ?_⟩
calc ↑hf.toFinset.card * ε = ∑ _i ∈ hf.toFinset, ε := by rw [Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ hf.toFinset, a i := Finset.sum_le_sum fun i => hf.mem_toFinset.1
_ ≤ ∑' i, a i := ENNReal.sum_le_tsum _
_ ≤ c := tsum_le_c
#align ennreal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le ENNReal.finset_card_const_le_le_of_tsum_le
theorem tsum_fiberwise (f : β → ℝ≥0∞) (g : β → γ) :
∑' x, ∑' b : g ⁻¹' {x}, f b = ∑' i, f i := by
apply HasSum.tsum_eq
let equiv := Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv g
apply (equiv.hasSum_iff.mpr ENNReal.summable.hasSum).sigma
exact fun _ ↦ ENNReal.summable.hasSum_iff.mpr rfl
end tsum
theorem tendsto_toReal_iff {ι} {fi : Filter ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ∞) {x : ℝ≥0∞}
(hx : x ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun n => (f n).toReal) fi (𝓝 x.toReal) ↔ Tendsto f fi (𝓝 x) := by
lift f to ι → ℝ≥0 using hf
lift x to ℝ≥0 using hx
simp [tendsto_coe]
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real_iff ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff
theorem tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ≠ ∞ ↔ Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) := by
rw [NNReal.summable_coe]
exact tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe
theorem tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(∑' a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) = ∞ ↔ ¬Summable fun a => (f a : ℝ) :=
tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable_coe.not_right
#align ennreal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq_top_iff_not_summable_coe
theorem hasSum_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) :
HasSum (fun x => (f x).toReal) (∑' x, (f x).toReal) := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hsum
simp only [coe_toReal, ← NNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.hasSum_coe]
exact (tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hsum).hasSum
#align ennreal.has_sum_to_real ENNReal.hasSum_toReal
theorem summable_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hsum : ∑' x, f x ≠ ∞) : Summable fun x => (f x).toReal :=
(hasSum_toReal hsum).summable
#align ennreal.summable_to_real ENNReal.summable_toReal
end ENNReal
namespace NNReal
theorem tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum {f : β → ℝ≥0} : ∑' b, f b = (∑' b, (f b : ℝ≥0∞)).toNNReal := by
by_cases h : Summable f
· rw [← ENNReal.coe_tsum h, ENNReal.toNNReal_coe]
· have A := tsum_eq_zero_of_not_summable h
simp only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, Classical.not_not] at h
simp only [h, ENNReal.top_toNNReal, A]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_to_nnreal_tsum NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem exists_le_hasSum_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) (hfr : HasSum f r) :
∃ p ≤ r, HasSum g p :=
have : (∑' b, (g b : ℝ≥0∞)) ≤ r := by
refine hasSum_le (fun b => ?_) ENNReal.summable.hasSum (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.2 hfr)
exact ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (hgf _)
let ⟨p, Eq, hpr⟩ := ENNReal.le_coe_iff.1 this
⟨p, hpr, ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 <| Eq ▸ ENNReal.summable.hasSum⟩
#align nnreal.exists_le_has_sum_of_le NNReal.exists_le_hasSum_of_le
/-- Comparison test of convergence of `ℝ≥0`-valued series. -/
theorem summable_of_le {f g : β → ℝ≥0} (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b) : Summable f → Summable g
| ⟨_r, hfr⟩ =>
let ⟨_p, _, hp⟩ := exists_le_hasSum_of_le hgf hfr
hp.summable
#align nnreal.summable_of_le NNReal.summable_of_le
/-- Summable non-negative functions have countable support -/
theorem _root_.Summable.countable_support_nnreal (f : α → ℝ≥0) (h : Summable f) :
f.support.Countable := by
rw [← NNReal.summable_coe] at h
simpa [support] using h.countable_support
/-- A series of non-negative real numbers converges to `r` in the sense of `HasSum` if and only if
the sequence of partial sum converges to `r`. -/
theorem hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {r : ℝ≥0} :
HasSum f r ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 r) := by
rw [← ENNReal.hasSum_coe, ENNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat]
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_finset_sum]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_coe
#align nnreal.has_sum_iff_tendsto_nat NNReal.hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
constructor
· intro h
refine ((tendsto_of_monotone ?_).resolve_right h).comp ?_
exacts [Finset.sum_mono_set _, tendsto_finset_range]
· rintro hnat ⟨r, hr⟩
exact not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop hnat _ (hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat.1 hr)
#align nnreal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop]
#align nnreal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_at_top NNReal.summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop
theorem summable_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : Summable f := by
refine summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop.2 fun H => ?_
rcases exists_lt_of_tendsto_atTop H 0 c with ⟨n, -, hn⟩
exact lt_irrefl _ (hn.trans_le (h n))
#align nnreal.summable_of_sum_range_le NNReal.summable_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le (summable_of_sum_range_le h) h
#align nnreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le NNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {i : β → α}
(hi : Function.Injective i) : (∑' x, f (i x)) ≤ ∑' x, f x :=
tsum_le_tsum_of_inj i hi (fun _ _ => zero_le _) (fun _ => le_rfl) (summable_comp_injective hf hi)
hf
#align nnreal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
theorem summable_sigma {β : α → Type*} {f : (Σ x, β x) → ℝ≥0} :
Summable f ↔ (∀ x, Summable fun y => f ⟨x, y⟩) ∧ Summable fun x => ∑' y, f ⟨x, y⟩ := by
constructor
· simp only [← NNReal.summable_coe, NNReal.coe_tsum]
exact fun h => ⟨h.sigma_factor, h.sigma⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simpa only [← ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable, ENNReal.tsum_sigma',
ENNReal.coe_tsum (h₁ _)] using h₂
#align nnreal.summable_sigma NNReal.summable_sigma
theorem indicator_summable {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (s : Set α) :
Summable (s.indicator f) := by
refine NNReal.summable_of_le (fun a => le_trans (le_of_eq (s.indicator_apply f a)) ?_) hf
split_ifs
· exact le_refl (f a)
· exact zero_le_coe
#align nnreal.indicator_summable NNReal.indicator_summable
theorem tsum_indicator_ne_zero {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) {s : Set α} (h : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 0) :
(∑' x, (s.indicator f) x) ≠ 0 := fun h' =>
let ⟨a, ha, hap⟩ := h
hap ((Set.indicator_apply_eq_self.mpr (absurd ha)).symm.trans
((tsum_eq_zero_iff (indicator_summable hf s)).1 h' a))
#align nnreal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero NNReal.tsum_indicator_ne_zero
open Finset
/-- For `f : ℕ → ℝ≥0`, then `∑' k, f (k + i)` tends to zero. This does not require a summability
assumption on `f`, as otherwise all sums are zero. -/
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0) : Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← tendsto_coe]
convert _root_.tendsto_sum_nat_add fun i => (f i : ℝ)
norm_cast
#align nnreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
nonrec theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
have A : ∀ a : α, (f a : ℝ) ≤ g a := fun a => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (h a)
have : (sf : ℝ) < sg := hasSum_lt A (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hi) (hasSum_coe.2 hf) (hasSum_coe.2 hg)
exact NNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 this
#align nnreal.has_sum_lt NNReal.hasSum_lt
@[mono]
theorem hasSum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {sf sg : ℝ≥0} (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg)
(h : f < g) : sf < sg :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
hasSum_lt hle hi hf hg
#align nnreal.has_sum_strict_mono NNReal.hasSum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hg : Summable g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
hasSum_lt h hi (summable_of_le h hg).hasSum hg.hasSum
#align nnreal.tsum_lt_tsum NNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
@[mono]
theorem tsum_strict_mono {f g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (h : f < g) : ∑' n, f n < ∑' n, g n :=
let ⟨hle, _i, hi⟩ := Pi.lt_def.mp h
tsum_lt_tsum hle hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_strict_mono NNReal.tsum_strict_mono
theorem tsum_pos {g : α → ℝ≥0} (hg : Summable g) (i : α) (hi : 0 < g i) : 0 < ∑' b, g b := by
rw [← tsum_zero]
exact tsum_lt_tsum (fun a => zero_le _) hi hg
#align nnreal.tsum_pos NNReal.tsum_pos
theorem tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Summable f) (i : α) :
∑' x, f x = f i + ∑' x, ite (x = i) 0 (f x) := by
refine tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite' i (NNReal.summable_of_le (fun i' => ?_) hf)
rw [Function.update_apply]
split_ifs <;> simp only [zero_le', le_rfl]
#align nnreal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite NNReal.tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
theorem tsum_toNNReal_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ ∞) :
(∑' a, f a).toNNReal = ∑' a, (f a).toNNReal :=
(congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal (tsum_congr fun x => (coe_toNNReal (hf x)).symm)).trans
NNReal.tsum_eq_toNNReal_tsum.symm
#align ennreal.tsum_to_nnreal_eq ENNReal.tsum_toNNReal_eq
theorem tsum_toReal_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ ∞) :
(∑' a, f a).toReal = ∑' a, (f a).toReal := by
simp only [ENNReal.toReal, tsum_toNNReal_eq hf, NNReal.coe_tsum]
#align ennreal.tsum_to_real_eq ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq
theorem tendsto_sum_nat_add (f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : ∑' i, f i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∑' k, f (k + i)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hf
replace hf : Summable f := tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.1 hf
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_tsum, NNReal.summable_nat_add _ hf, ← ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact mod_cast NNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add f
#align ennreal.tendsto_sum_nat_add ENNReal.tendsto_sum_nat_add
theorem tsum_le_of_sum_range_le {f : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ n, ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i ≤ c) : ∑' n, f n ≤ c :=
_root_.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le ENNReal.summable h
#align ennreal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le ENNReal.tsum_le_of_sum_range_le
theorem hasSum_lt {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {sf sg : ℝ≥0∞} {i : α} (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a) (hi : f i < g i)
(hsf : sf ≠ ∞) (hf : HasSum f sf) (hg : HasSum g sg) : sf < sg := by
by_cases hsg : sg = ∞
· exact hsg.symm ▸ lt_of_le_of_ne le_top hsf
· have hg' : ∀ x, g x ≠ ∞ := ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top (hg.tsum_eq.symm ▸ hsg)
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using fun x =>
ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt (h x) <| lt_of_le_of_ne le_top (hg' x))
lift g to α → ℝ≥0 using hg'
lift sf to ℝ≥0 using hsf
lift sg to ℝ≥0 using hsg
simp only [coe_le_coe, coe_lt_coe] at h hi ⊢
exact NNReal.hasSum_lt h hi (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 hf) (ENNReal.hasSum_coe.1 hg)
#align ennreal.has_sum_lt ENNReal.hasSum_lt
theorem tsum_lt_tsum {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {i : α} (hfi : tsum f ≠ ∞) (h : ∀ a : α, f a ≤ g a)
(hi : f i < g i) : ∑' x, f x < ∑' x, g x :=
hasSum_lt h hi hfi ENNReal.summable.hasSum ENNReal.summable.hasSum
#align ennreal.tsum_lt_tsum ENNReal.tsum_lt_tsum
end ENNReal
theorem tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj {β : Type*} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Summable f) (hn : ∀ a, 0 ≤ f a)
{i : β → α} (hi : Function.Injective i) : tsum (f ∘ i) ≤ tsum f := by
lift f to α → ℝ≥0 using hn
rw [NNReal.summable_coe] at hf
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), ← NNReal.coe_tsum] using NNReal.tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj hf hi
#align tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj tsum_comp_le_tsum_of_inj
/-- Comparison test of convergence of series of non-negative real numbers. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 1,330 | 1,335 | theorem Summable.of_nonneg_of_le {f g : β → ℝ} (hg : ∀ b, 0 ≤ g b) (hgf : ∀ b, g b ≤ f b)
(hf : Summable f) : Summable g := by |
lift f to β → ℝ≥0 using fun b => (hg b).trans (hgf b)
lift g to β → ℝ≥0 using hg
rw [NNReal.summable_coe] at hf ⊢
exact NNReal.summable_of_le (fun b => NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 (hgf b)) hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Shing Tak Lam. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Shing Tak Lam
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Ordered
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.UnitInterval
#align_import topology.homotopy.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"11c53f174270aa43140c0b26dabce5fc4a253e80"
/-!
# Homotopy between functions
In this file, we define a homotopy between two functions `f₀` and `f₁`. First we define
`ContinuousMap.Homotopy` between the two functions, with no restrictions on the intermediate
maps. Then, as in the formalisation in HOL-Analysis, we define
`ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith f₀ f₁ P`, for homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁`, where the
intermediate maps satisfy the predicate `P`. Finally, we define
`ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S`, for homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁` which are fixed
on `S`.
## Definitions
* `ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁` is the type of homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁`.
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith f₀ f₁ P` is the type of homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁`, where
the intermediate maps satisfy the predicate `P`.
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ S` is the type of homotopies between `f₀` and `f₁` which
are fixed on `S`.
For each of the above, we have
* `refl f`, which is the constant homotopy from `f` to `f`.
* `symm F`, which reverses the homotopy `F`. For example, if `F : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁`,
then `F.symm : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₁ f₀`.
* `trans F G`, which concatenates the homotopies `F` and `G`. For example, if
`F : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁` and `G : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₁ f₂`, then
`F.trans G : ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₂`.
We also define the relations
* `ContinuousMap.Homotopic f₀ f₁` is defined to be `Nonempty (ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁)`
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopicWith f₀ f₁ P` is defined to be
`Nonempty (ContinuousMap.HomotopyWith f₀ f₁ P)`
* `ContinuousMap.HomotopicRel f₀ f₁ P` is defined to be
`Nonempty (ContinuousMap.HomotopyRel f₀ f₁ P)`
and for `ContinuousMap.homotopic` and `ContinuousMap.homotopic_rel`, we also define the
`setoid` and `quotient` in `C(X, Y)` by these relations.
## References
- [HOL-Analysis formalisation](https://isabelle.in.tum.de/library/HOL/HOL-Analysis/Homotopy.html)
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w x
variable {F : Type*} {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w} {Z' : Type x} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z] [TopologicalSpace Z']
open unitInterval
namespace ContinuousMap
/-- `ContinuousMap.Homotopy f₀ f₁` is the type of homotopies from `f₀` to `f₁`.
When possible, instead of parametrizing results over `(f : Homotopy f₀ f₁)`,
you should parametrize over `{F : Type*} [HomotopyLike F f₀ f₁] (f : F)`.
When you extend this structure, make sure to extend `ContinuousMap.HomotopyLike`. -/
structure Homotopy (f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)) extends C(I × X, Y) where
/-- value of the homotopy at 0 -/
map_zero_left : ∀ x, toFun (0, x) = f₀ x
/-- value of the homotopy at 1 -/
map_one_left : ∀ x, toFun (1, x) = f₁ x
#align continuous_map.homotopy ContinuousMap.Homotopy
section
/-- `ContinuousMap.HomotopyLike F f₀ f₁` states that `F` is a type of homotopies between `f₀` and
`f₁`.
You should extend this class when you extend `ContinuousMap.Homotopy`. -/
class HomotopyLike {X Y : outParam Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
(F : Type*) (f₀ f₁ : outParam <| C(X, Y)) [FunLike F (I × X) Y]
extends ContinuousMapClass F (I × X) Y : Prop where
/-- value of the homotopy at 0 -/
map_zero_left (f : F) : ∀ x, f (0, x) = f₀ x
/-- value of the homotopy at 1 -/
map_one_left (f : F) : ∀ x, f (1, x) = f₁ x
#align continuous_map.homotopy_like ContinuousMap.HomotopyLike
end
namespace Homotopy
section
variable {f₀ f₁ : C(X, Y)}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Homotopy f₀ f₁) (I × X) Y where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := f
obtain ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩ := g
congr
instance : HomotopyLike (Homotopy f₀ f₁) f₀ f₁ where
map_continuous f := f.continuous_toFun
map_zero_left f := f.map_zero_left
map_one_left f := f.map_one_left
@[ext]
theorem ext {F G : Homotopy f₀ f₁} (h : ∀ x, F x = G x) : F = G :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align continuous_map.homotopy.ext ContinuousMap.Homotopy.ext
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : I × X → Y :=
F
#align continuous_map.homotopy.simps.apply ContinuousMap.Homotopy.Simps.apply
initialize_simps_projections Homotopy (toFun → apply, -toContinuousMap)
/-- Deprecated. Use `map_continuous` instead. -/
protected theorem continuous (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : Continuous F :=
F.continuous_toFun
#align continuous_map.homotopy.continuous ContinuousMap.Homotopy.continuous
@[simp]
theorem apply_zero (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (x : X) : F (0, x) = f₀ x :=
F.map_zero_left x
#align continuous_map.homotopy.apply_zero ContinuousMap.Homotopy.apply_zero
@[simp]
theorem apply_one (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (x : X) : F (1, x) = f₁ x :=
F.map_one_left x
#align continuous_map.homotopy.apply_one ContinuousMap.Homotopy.apply_one
@[simp]
theorem coe_toContinuousMap (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : ⇑F.toContinuousMap = F :=
rfl
#align continuous_map.homotopy.coe_to_continuous_map ContinuousMap.Homotopy.coe_toContinuousMap
/-- Currying a homotopy to a continuous function from `I` to `C(X, Y)`.
-/
def curry (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : C(I, C(X, Y)) :=
F.toContinuousMap.curry
#align continuous_map.homotopy.curry ContinuousMap.Homotopy.curry
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) (t : I) (x : X) : F.curry t x = F (t, x) :=
rfl
#align continuous_map.homotopy.curry_apply ContinuousMap.Homotopy.curry_apply
/-- Continuously extending a curried homotopy to a function from `ℝ` to `C(X, Y)`.
-/
def extend (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) : C(ℝ, C(X, Y)) :=
F.curry.IccExtend zero_le_one
#align continuous_map.homotopy.extend ContinuousMap.Homotopy.extend
theorem extend_apply_of_le_zero (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) {t : ℝ} (ht : t ≤ 0) (x : X) :
F.extend t x = f₀ x := by
rw [← F.apply_zero]
exact ContinuousMap.congr_fun (Set.IccExtend_of_le_left (zero_le_one' ℝ) F.curry ht) x
#align continuous_map.homotopy.extend_apply_of_le_zero ContinuousMap.Homotopy.extend_apply_of_le_zero
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/Basic.lean | 172 | 175 | theorem extend_apply_of_one_le (F : Homotopy f₀ f₁) {t : ℝ} (ht : 1 ≤ t) (x : X) :
F.extend t x = f₁ x := by |
rw [← F.apply_one]
exact ContinuousMap.congr_fun (Set.IccExtend_of_right_le (zero_le_one' ℝ) F.curry ht) x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Ring.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.infinite_sum.ring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9a59dcb7a2d06bf55da57b9030169219980660cd"
/-!
# Infinite sum in a ring
This file provides lemmas about the interaction between infinite sums and multiplication.
## Main results
* `tsum_mul_tsum_eq_tsum_sum_antidiagonal`: Cauchy product formula
-/
open Filter Finset Function
open scoped Classical
variable {ι κ R α : Type*}
section NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSemiring α] {f g : ι → α}
{a a₁ a₂ : α}
theorem HasSum.mul_left (a₂) (h : HasSum f a₁) : HasSum (fun i ↦ a₂ * f i) (a₂ * a₁) := by
simpa only using h.map (AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a₂) (continuous_const.mul continuous_id)
#align has_sum.mul_left HasSum.mul_left
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Ring.lean | 38 | 39 | theorem HasSum.mul_right (a₂) (hf : HasSum f a₁) : HasSum (fun i ↦ f i * a₂) (a₁ * a₂) := by |
simpa only using hf.map (AddMonoidHom.mulRight a₂) (continuous_id.mul continuous_const)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.pi.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
/-!
# Categories of indexed families of objects.
We define the pointwise category structure on indexed families of objects in a category
(and also the dependent generalization).
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w₀ w₁ w₂ v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
variable {I : Type w₀} {J : Type w₁} (C : I → Type u₁) [∀ i, Category.{v₁} (C i)]
/-- `pi C` gives the cartesian product of an indexed family of categories.
-/
instance pi : Category.{max w₀ v₁} (∀ i, C i) where
Hom X Y := ∀ i, X i ⟶ Y i
id X i := 𝟙 (X i)
comp f g i := f i ≫ g i
#align category_theory.pi CategoryTheory.pi
/-- This provides some assistance to typeclass search in a common situation,
which otherwise fails. (Without this `CategoryTheory.Pi.has_limit_of_has_limit_comp_eval` fails.)
-/
abbrev pi' {I : Type v₁} (C : I → Type u₁) [∀ i, Category.{v₁} (C i)] : Category.{v₁} (∀ i, C i) :=
CategoryTheory.pi C
#align category_theory.pi' CategoryTheory.pi'
attribute [instance] pi'
namespace Pi
@[simp]
theorem id_apply (X : ∀ i, C i) (i) : (𝟙 X : ∀ i, X i ⟶ X i) i = 𝟙 (X i) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.id_apply CategoryTheory.Pi.id_apply
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (i) :
(f ≫ g : ∀ i, X i ⟶ Z i) i = f i ≫ g i :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.comp_apply CategoryTheory.Pi.comp_apply
-- Porting note: need to add an additional `ext` lemma.
@[ext]
lemma ext {X Y : ∀ i, C i} {f g : X ⟶ Y} (w : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
funext (w ·)
/--
The evaluation functor at `i : I`, sending an `I`-indexed family of objects to the object over `i`.
-/
@[simps]
def eval (i : I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ C i where
obj f := f i
map α := α i
#align category_theory.pi.eval CategoryTheory.Pi.eval
section
variable {J : Type w₁}
/- Porting note: add this because Lean cannot see directly through the `∘` for
`Function.comp` -/
instance (f : J → I) : (j : J) → Category ((C ∘ f) j) := by
dsimp
infer_instance
/-- Pull back an `I`-indexed family of objects to a `J`-indexed family, along a function `J → I`.
-/
@[simps]
def comap (h : J → I) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, C (h j)) where
obj f i := f (h i)
map α i := α (h i)
#align category_theory.pi.comap CategoryTheory.Pi.comap
variable (I)
/-- The natural isomorphism between
pulling back a grading along the identity function,
and the identity functor. -/
@[simps]
def comapId : comap C (id : I → I) ≅ 𝟭 (∀ i, C i) where
hom := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
inv := { app := fun X => 𝟙 X }
#align category_theory.pi.comap_id CategoryTheory.Pi.comapId
example (g : J → I) : (j : J) → Category (C (g j)) := by infer_instance
variable {I}
variable {K : Type w₂}
/-- The natural isomorphism comparing between
pulling back along two successive functions, and
pulling back along their composition
-/
@[simps!]
def comapComp (f : K → J) (g : J → I) : comap C g ⋙ comap (C ∘ g) f ≅ comap C (g ∘ f) where
hom :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
inv :=
{ app := fun X b => 𝟙 (X (g (f b)))
naturality := fun X Y f' => by simp only [comap, Function.comp]; funext; simp }
#align category_theory.pi.comap_comp CategoryTheory.Pi.comapComp
/-- The natural isomorphism between pulling back then evaluating, and just evaluating. -/
@[simps!]
def comapEvalIsoEval (h : J → I) (j : J) : comap C h ⋙ eval (C ∘ h) j ≅ eval C (h j) :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun f => Iso.refl _) (by simp only [Iso.refl]; aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.pi.comap_eval_iso_eval CategoryTheory.Pi.comapEvalIsoEval
end
section
variable {J : Type w₀} {D : J → Type u₁} [∀ j, Category.{v₁} (D j)]
/- Porting note: maybe mixing up universes -/
instance sumElimCategory : ∀ s : Sum I J, Category.{v₁} (Sum.elim C D s)
| Sum.inl i => by
dsimp
infer_instance
| Sum.inr j => by
dsimp
infer_instance
#align category_theory.pi.sum_elim_category CategoryTheory.Pi.sumElimCategoryₓ
/- Porting note: replaced `Sum.rec` with `match`'s per the error about
current state of code generation -/
/-- The bifunctor combining an `I`-indexed family of objects with a `J`-indexed family of objects
to obtain an `I ⊕ J`-indexed family of objects.
-/
@[simps]
def sum : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ (∀ j, D j) ⥤ ∀ s : Sum I J, Sum.elim C D s where
obj X :=
{ obj := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => X i
| .inr j => Y j
map := fun {Y} {Y'} f s =>
match s with
| .inl i => 𝟙 (X i)
| .inr j => f j }
map {X} {X'} f :=
{ app := fun Y s =>
match s with
| .inl i => f i
| .inr j => 𝟙 (Y j) }
#align category_theory.pi.sum CategoryTheory.Pi.sum
end
variable {C}
/-- An isomorphism between `I`-indexed objects gives an isomorphism between each
pair of corresponding components. -/
@[simps]
def isoApp {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : X i ≅ Y i :=
⟨f.hom i, f.inv i,
by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.hom_inv_id, id_apply], by rw [← comp_apply, Iso.inv_hom_id, id_apply]⟩
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_refl (X : ∀ i, C i) (i : I) : isoApp (Iso.refl X) i = Iso.refl (X i) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app_refl CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp_refl
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_symm {X Y : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (i : I) : isoApp f.symm i = (isoApp f i).symm :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app_symm CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp_symm
@[simp]
theorem isoApp_trans {X Y Z : ∀ i, C i} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (i : I) :
isoApp (f ≪≫ g) i = isoApp f i ≪≫ isoApp g i :=
rfl
#align category_theory.pi.iso_app_trans CategoryTheory.Pi.isoApp_trans
end Pi
namespace Functor
variable {C}
variable {D : I → Type u₂} [∀ i, Category.{v₂} (D i)] {A : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} A]
/-- Assemble an `I`-indexed family of functors into a functor between the pi types.
-/
@[simps]
def pi (F : ∀ i, C i ⥤ D i) : (∀ i, C i) ⥤ ∀ i, D i where
obj f i := (F i).obj (f i)
map α i := (F i).map (α i)
#align category_theory.functor.pi CategoryTheory.Functor.pi
/-- Similar to `pi`, but all functors come from the same category `A`
-/
@[simps]
def pi' (f : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) : A ⥤ ∀ i, C i where
obj a i := (f i).obj a
map h i := (f i).map h
#align category_theory.functor.pi' CategoryTheory.Functor.pi'
/-- The projections of `Functor.pi' F` are isomorphic to the functors of the family `F` -/
@[simps!]
def pi'CompEval {A : Type*} [Category A] (F : ∀ i, A ⥤ C i) (i : I) :
pi' F ⋙ Pi.eval C i ≅ F i :=
Iso.refl _
section EqToHom
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Pi/Basic.lean | 226 | 229 | theorem eqToHom_proj {x x' : ∀ i, C i} (h : x = x') (i : I) :
(eqToHom h : x ⟶ x') i = eqToHom (Function.funext_iff.mp h i) := by |
subst h
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
#align_import data.complex.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31c24aa72e7b3e5ed97a8412470e904f82b81004"
/-!
# The complex numbers
The complex numbers are modelled as ℝ^2 in the obvious way and it is shown that they form a field
of characteristic zero. The result that the complex numbers are algebraically closed, see
`FieldTheory.AlgebraicClosure`.
-/
open Set Function
/-! ### Definition and basic arithmetic -/
/-- Complex numbers consist of two `Real`s: a real part `re` and an imaginary part `im`. -/
structure Complex : Type where
/-- The real part of a complex number. -/
re : ℝ
/-- The imaginary part of a complex number. -/
im : ℝ
#align complex Complex
@[inherit_doc] notation "ℂ" => Complex
namespace Complex
open ComplexConjugate
noncomputable instance : DecidableEq ℂ :=
Classical.decEq _
/-- The equivalence between the complex numbers and `ℝ × ℝ`. -/
@[simps apply]
def equivRealProd : ℂ ≃ ℝ × ℝ where
toFun z := ⟨z.re, z.im⟩
invFun p := ⟨p.1, p.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align complex.equiv_real_prod Complex.equivRealProd
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ z : ℂ, Complex.mk z.re z.im = z
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align complex.eta Complex.eta
-- We only mark this lemma with `ext` *locally* to avoid it applying whenever terms of `ℂ` appear.
theorem ext : ∀ {z w : ℂ}, z.re = w.re → z.im = w.im → z = w
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl, rfl => rfl
#align complex.ext Complex.ext
attribute [local ext] Complex.ext
theorem ext_iff {z w : ℂ} : z = w ↔ z.re = w.re ∧ z.im = w.im :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H], fun h => ext h.1 h.2⟩
#align complex.ext_iff Complex.ext_iff
theorem re_surjective : Surjective re := fun x => ⟨⟨x, 0⟩, rfl⟩
#align complex.re_surjective Complex.re_surjective
theorem im_surjective : Surjective im := fun y => ⟨⟨0, y⟩, rfl⟩
#align complex.im_surjective Complex.im_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_re : range re = univ :=
re_surjective.range_eq
#align complex.range_re Complex.range_re
@[simp]
theorem range_im : range im = univ :=
im_surjective.range_eq
#align complex.range_im Complex.range_im
-- Porting note: refactored instance to allow `norm_cast` to work
/-- The natural inclusion of the real numbers into the complex numbers.
The name `Complex.ofReal` is reserved for the bundled homomorphism. -/
@[coe]
def ofReal' (r : ℝ) : ℂ :=
⟨r, 0⟩
instance : Coe ℝ ℂ :=
⟨ofReal'⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_re (r : ℝ) : Complex.re (r : ℂ) = r :=
rfl
#align complex.of_real_re Complex.ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_im (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align complex.of_real_im Complex.ofReal_im
theorem ofReal_def (r : ℝ) : (r : ℂ) = ⟨r, 0⟩ :=
rfl
#align complex.of_real_def Complex.ofReal_def
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = w ↔ z = w :=
⟨congrArg re, by apply congrArg⟩
#align complex.of_real_inj Complex.ofReal_inj
-- Porting note: made coercion explicit
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) := fun _ _ => congrArg re
#align complex.of_real_injective Complex.ofReal_injective
-- Porting note: made coercion explicit
instance canLift : CanLift ℂ ℝ (↑) fun z => z.im = 0 where
prf z hz := ⟨z.re, ext rfl hz.symm⟩
#align complex.can_lift Complex.canLift
/-- The product of a set on the real axis and a set on the imaginary axis of the complex plane,
denoted by `s ×ℂ t`. -/
def Set.reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : Set ℂ :=
re ⁻¹' s ∩ im ⁻¹' t
#align set.re_prod_im Complex.Set.reProdIm
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:72 " ×ℂ " => Set.reProdIm
theorem mem_reProdIm {z : ℂ} {s t : Set ℝ} : z ∈ s ×ℂ t ↔ z.re ∈ s ∧ z.im ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align complex.mem_re_prod_im Complex.mem_reProdIm
instance : Zero ℂ :=
⟨(0 : ℝ)⟩
instance : Inhabited ℂ :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℂ).re = 0 :=
rfl
#align complex.zero_re Complex.zero_re
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align complex.zero_im Complex.zero_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 0 :=
rfl
#align complex.of_real_zero Complex.ofReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
ofReal_inj
#align complex.of_real_eq_zero Complex.ofReal_eq_zero
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_zero
#align complex.of_real_ne_zero Complex.ofReal_ne_zero
instance : One ℂ :=
⟨(1 : ℝ)⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℂ).re = 1 :=
rfl
#align complex.one_re Complex.one_re
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℂ).im = 0 :=
rfl
#align complex.one_im Complex.one_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : ℂ) = 1 :=
rfl
#align complex.of_real_one Complex.ofReal_one
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_eq_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) = 1 ↔ z = 1 :=
ofReal_inj
#align complex.of_real_eq_one Complex.ofReal_eq_one
theorem ofReal_ne_one {z : ℝ} : (z : ℂ) ≠ 1 ↔ z ≠ 1 :=
not_congr ofReal_eq_one
#align complex.of_real_ne_one Complex.ofReal_ne_one
instance : Add ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re + w.re, z.im + w.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
#align complex.add_re Complex.add_re
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℂ) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
#align complex.add_im Complex.add_im
-- replaced by `re_ofNat`
#noalign complex.bit0_re
#noalign complex.bit1_re
-- replaced by `im_ofNat`
#noalign complex.bit0_im
#noalign complex.bit1_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r + s :=
ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal']
#align complex.of_real_add Complex.ofReal_add
-- replaced by `Complex.ofReal_ofNat`
#noalign complex.of_real_bit0
#noalign complex.of_real_bit1
instance : Neg ℂ :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.re, -z.im⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℂ) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
#align complex.neg_re Complex.neg_re
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℂ) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
#align complex.neg_im Complex.neg_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : ℂ) = -r :=
ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal']
#align complex.of_real_neg Complex.ofReal_neg
instance : Sub ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re - w.re, z.im - w.im⟩⟩
instance : Mul ℂ :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im, z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re - z.im * w.im :=
rfl
#align complex.mul_re Complex.mul_re
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℂ) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
#align complex.mul_im Complex.mul_im
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : ℂ) = r * s :=
ext_iff.2 <| by simp [ofReal']
#align complex.of_real_mul Complex.ofReal_mul
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).re = r * z.re := by simp [ofReal']
#align complex.of_real_mul_re Complex.re_ofReal_mul
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Basic.lean | 262 | 262 | theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : ℂ) : (r * z).im = r * z.im := by | simp [ofReal']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.SpecificFunctions.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.complex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8f9fea08977f7e450770933ee6abb20733b47c92"
/-!
# Complex trigonometric functions
Basic facts and derivatives for the complex trigonometric functions.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred here, rather than
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for complex trigonometric
functions, or require additional imports which are not available in that file.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter
open scoped Real
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : cos θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
have h : (exp (θ * I) + exp (-θ * I)) / 2 = 0 ↔ exp (2 * θ * I) = -1 := by
rw [@div_eq_iff _ _ (exp (θ * I) + exp (-θ * I)) 2 0 two_ne_zero, zero_mul,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, neg_eq_neg_one_mul, ← div_eq_iff (exp_ne_zero _), ← exp_sub]
ring_nf
rw [cos, h, ← exp_pi_mul_I, exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int, mul_right_comm]
refine exists_congr fun x => ?_
refine (iff_of_eq <| congr_arg _ ?_).trans (mul_right_inj' <| mul_ne_zero two_ne_zero I_ne_zero)
field_simp; ring
#align complex.cos_eq_zero_iff Complex.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem cos_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : cos θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, θ ≠ (2 * k + 1) * π / 2 := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, cos_eq_zero_iff]
#align complex.cos_ne_zero_iff Complex.cos_ne_zero_iff
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : sin θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ = k * π := by
rw [← Complex.cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_zero_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
use k + 1
field_simp [eq_add_of_sub_eq hk]
ring
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
use k - 1
field_simp
ring
#align complex.sin_eq_zero_iff Complex.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, θ ≠ k * π := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align complex.sin_ne_zero_iff Complex.sin_ne_zero_iff
/-- The tangent of a complex number is equal to zero
iff this number is equal to `k * π / 2` for an integer `k`.
Note that this lemma takes into account that we use zero as the junk value for division by zero.
See also `Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff'`. -/
theorem tan_eq_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : tan θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * π / 2 = θ := by
rw [tan, div_eq_zero_iff, ← mul_eq_zero, ← mul_right_inj' two_ne_zero, mul_zero,
← mul_assoc, ← sin_two_mul, sin_eq_zero_iff]
field_simp [mul_comm, eq_comm]
#align complex.tan_eq_zero_iff Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff
theorem tan_ne_zero_iff {θ : ℂ} : tan θ ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ k : ℤ, (k * π / 2 : ℂ) ≠ θ := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, tan_eq_zero_iff]
#align complex.tan_ne_zero_iff Complex.tan_ne_zero_iff
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_div_two (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π / 2) = 0 :=
tan_eq_zero_iff.mpr (by use n)
#align complex.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two Complex.tan_int_mul_pi_div_two
/-- If the tangent of a complex number is well-defined,
then it is equal to zero iff the number is equal to `k * π` for an integer `k`.
See also `Complex.tan_eq_zero_iff` for a version that takes into account junk values of `θ`. -/
theorem tan_eq_zero_iff' {θ : ℂ} (hθ : cos θ ≠ 0) : tan θ = 0 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * π = θ := by
simp only [tan, hθ, div_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]; simp [eq_comm]
theorem cos_eq_cos_iff {x y : ℂ} : cos x = cos y ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = 2 * k * π - x :=
calc
cos x = cos y ↔ cos x - cos y = 0 := sub_eq_zero.symm
_ ↔ -2 * sin ((x + y) / 2) * sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 := by rw [cos_sub_cos]
_ ↔ sin ((x + y) / 2) = 0 ∨ sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 := by simp [(by norm_num : (2 : ℂ) ≠ 0)]
_ ↔ sin ((x - y) / 2) = 0 ∨ sin ((x + y) / 2) = 0 := or_comm
_ ↔ (∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x) ∨ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π - x := by
apply or_congr <;>
field_simp [sin_eq_zero_iff, (by norm_num : -(2 : ℂ) ≠ 0), eq_sub_iff_add_eq',
sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_comm (2 : ℂ), mul_right_comm _ (2 : ℂ)]
constructor <;> · rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩; use -k; simp
_ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = 2 * k * π - x := exists_or.symm
#align complex.cos_eq_cos_iff Complex.cos_eq_cos_iff
theorem sin_eq_sin_iff {x y : ℂ} :
sin x = sin y ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, y = 2 * k * π + x ∨ y = (2 * k + 1) * π - x := by
simp only [← Complex.cos_sub_pi_div_two, cos_eq_cos_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
refine exists_congr fun k => or_congr ?_ ?_ <;> refine Eq.congr rfl ?_ <;> field_simp <;> ring
#align complex.sin_eq_sin_iff Complex.sin_eq_sin_iff
theorem cos_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, k * (2 * π) = x := by
rw [← cos_zero, eq_comm, cos_eq_cos_iff]
simp [mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, eq_comm]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Complex.lean | 114 | 116 | theorem cos_eq_neg_one_iff {x : ℂ} : cos x = -1 ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, π + k * (2 * π) = x := by |
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← cos_sub_pi, cos_eq_one_iff]
simp only [eq_sub_iff_add_eq']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Banach
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.symmetric from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Symmetric linear maps in an inner product space
This file defines and proves basic theorems about symmetric **not necessarily bounded** operators
on an inner product space, i.e linear maps `T : E → E` such that `∀ x y, ⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫`.
In comparison to `IsSelfAdjoint`, this definition works for non-continuous linear maps, and
doesn't rely on the definition of the adjoint, which allows it to be stated in non-complete space.
## Main definitions
* `LinearMap.IsSymmetric`: a (not necessarily bounded) operator on an inner product space is
symmetric, if for all `x`, `y`, we have `⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫`
## Main statements
* `IsSymmetric.continuous`: if a symmetric operator is defined on a complete space, then
it is automatically continuous.
## Tags
self-adjoint, symmetric
-/
open RCLike
open ComplexConjugate
variable {𝕜 E E' F G : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup G] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 G]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E']
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
namespace LinearMap
/-! ### Symmetric operators -/
/-- A (not necessarily bounded) operator on an inner product space is symmetric, if for all
`x`, `y`, we have `⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫`. -/
def IsSymmetric (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) : Prop :=
∀ x y, ⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫
#align linear_map.is_symmetric LinearMap.IsSymmetric
section Real
/-- An operator `T` on an inner product space is symmetric if and only if it is
`LinearMap.IsSelfAdjoint` with respect to the sesquilinear form given by the inner product. -/
theorem isSymmetric_iff_sesqForm (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E) :
T.IsSymmetric ↔ LinearMap.IsSelfAdjoint (R := 𝕜) (M := E) sesqFormOfInner T :=
⟨fun h x y => (h y x).symm, fun h x y => (h y x).symm⟩
#align linear_map.is_symmetric_iff_sesq_form LinearMap.isSymmetric_iff_sesqForm
end Real
theorem IsSymmetric.conj_inner_sym {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric T) (x y : E) :
conj ⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪T y, x⟫ := by rw [hT x y, inner_conj_symm]
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.conj_inner_sym LinearMap.IsSymmetric.conj_inner_sym
@[simp]
theorem IsSymmetric.apply_clm {T : E →L[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric (T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E)) (x y : E) :
⟪T x, y⟫ = ⟪x, T y⟫ :=
hT x y
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.apply_clm LinearMap.IsSymmetric.apply_clm
theorem isSymmetric_zero : (0 : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := fun x y =>
(inner_zero_right x : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0).symm ▸ (inner_zero_left y : ⟪0, y⟫ = 0)
#align linear_map.is_symmetric_zero LinearMap.isSymmetric_zero
theorem isSymmetric_id : (LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[𝕜] E).IsSymmetric := fun _ _ => rfl
#align linear_map.is_symmetric_id LinearMap.isSymmetric_id
theorem IsSymmetric.add {T S : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : T.IsSymmetric) (hS : S.IsSymmetric) :
(T + S).IsSymmetric := by
intro x y
rw [LinearMap.add_apply, inner_add_left, hT x y, hS x y, ← inner_add_right]
rfl
#align linear_map.is_symmetric.add LinearMap.IsSymmetric.add
/-- The **Hellinger--Toeplitz theorem**: if a symmetric operator is defined on a complete space,
then it is automatically continuous. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Symmetric.lean | 97 | 110 | theorem IsSymmetric.continuous [CompleteSpace E] {T : E →ₗ[𝕜] E} (hT : IsSymmetric T) :
Continuous T := by |
-- We prove it by using the closed graph theorem
refine T.continuous_of_seq_closed_graph fun u x y hu hTu => ?_
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hlhs : ∀ k : ℕ, ⟪T (u k) - T x, y - T x⟫ = ⟪u k - x, T (y - T x)⟫ := by
intro k
rw [← T.map_sub, hT]
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ((hTu.sub_const _).inner tendsto_const_nhds) ?_
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, hlhs]
rw [← inner_zero_left (T (y - T x))]
refine Filter.Tendsto.inner ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
rw [← sub_self x]
exact hu.sub_const _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PEquiv
#align_import data.matrix.pequiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
/-!
# partial equivalences for matrices
Using partial equivalences to represent matrices.
This file introduces the function `PEquiv.toMatrix`, which returns a matrix containing ones and
zeros. For any partial equivalence `f`, `f.toMatrix i j = 1 ↔ f i = some j`.
The following important properties of this function are proved
`toMatrix_trans : (f.trans g).toMatrix = f.toMatrix * g.toMatrix`
`toMatrix_symm : f.symm.toMatrix = f.toMatrixᵀ`
`toMatrix_refl : (PEquiv.refl n).toMatrix = 1`
`toMatrix_bot : ⊥.toMatrix = 0`
This theory gives the matrix representation of projection linear maps, and their right inverses.
For example, the matrix `(single (0 : Fin 1) (i : Fin n)).toMatrix` corresponds to the ith
projection map from R^n to R.
Any injective function `Fin m → Fin n` gives rise to a `PEquiv`, whose matrix is the projection
map from R^m → R^n represented by the same function. The transpose of this matrix is the right
inverse of this map, sending anything not in the image to zero.
## notations
This file uses `ᵀ` for `Matrix.transpose`.
-/
namespace PEquiv
open Matrix
universe u v
variable {k l m n : Type*}
variable {α : Type v}
open Matrix
/-- `toMatrix` returns a matrix containing ones and zeros. `f.toMatrix i j` is `1` if
`f i = some j` and `0` otherwise -/
def toMatrix [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃. n) : Matrix m n α :=
of fun i j => if j ∈ f i then (1 : α) else 0
#align pequiv.to_matrix PEquiv.toMatrix
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `toMatrix`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_apply [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃. n) (i j) :
toMatrix f i j = if j ∈ f i then (1 : α) else 0 :=
rfl
#align pequiv.to_matrix_apply PEquiv.toMatrix_apply
theorem mul_matrix_apply [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Semiring α] (f : l ≃. m) (M : Matrix m n α)
(i j) : (f.toMatrix * M :) i j = Option.casesOn (f i) 0 fun fi => M fi j := by
dsimp [toMatrix, Matrix.mul_apply]
cases' h : f i with fi
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single fi] <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [h, eq_comm]
#align pequiv.mul_matrix_apply PEquiv.mul_matrix_apply
theorem toMatrix_symm [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] (f : m ≃. n) :
(f.symm.toMatrix : Matrix n m α) = f.toMatrixᵀ := by
ext
simp only [transpose, mem_iff_mem f, toMatrix_apply]
congr
#align pequiv.to_matrix_symm PEquiv.toMatrix_symm
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_refl [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] :
((PEquiv.refl n).toMatrix : Matrix n n α) = 1 := by
ext
simp [toMatrix_apply, one_apply]
#align pequiv.to_matrix_refl PEquiv.toMatrix_refl
theorem matrix_mul_apply [Fintype m] [Semiring α] [DecidableEq n] (M : Matrix l m α) (f : m ≃. n)
(i j) : (M * f.toMatrix :) i j = Option.casesOn (f.symm j) 0 fun fj => M i fj := by
dsimp [toMatrix, Matrix.mul_apply]
cases' h : f.symm j with fj
· simp [h, ← f.eq_some_iff]
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single fj]
· simp [h, ← f.eq_some_iff]
· rintro b - n
simp [h, ← f.eq_some_iff, n.symm]
· simp
#align pequiv.matrix_mul_apply PEquiv.matrix_mul_apply
theorem toPEquiv_mul_matrix [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [Semiring α] (f : m ≃ m)
(M : Matrix m n α) : f.toPEquiv.toMatrix * M = M.submatrix f id := by
ext i j
rw [mul_matrix_apply, Equiv.toPEquiv_apply, submatrix_apply, id]
#align pequiv.to_pequiv_mul_matrix PEquiv.toPEquiv_mul_matrix
theorem mul_toPEquiv_toMatrix {m n α : Type*} [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [Semiring α] (f : n ≃ n)
(M : Matrix m n α) : M * f.toPEquiv.toMatrix = M.submatrix id f.symm :=
Matrix.ext fun i j => by
rw [PEquiv.matrix_mul_apply, ← Equiv.toPEquiv_symm, Equiv.toPEquiv_apply,
Matrix.submatrix_apply, id]
#align pequiv.mul_to_pequiv_to_matrix PEquiv.mul_toPEquiv_toMatrix
theorem toMatrix_trans [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [Semiring α] (f : l ≃. m)
(g : m ≃. n) : ((f.trans g).toMatrix : Matrix l n α) = f.toMatrix * g.toMatrix := by
ext i j
rw [mul_matrix_apply]
dsimp [toMatrix, PEquiv.trans]
cases f i <;> simp
#align pequiv.to_matrix_trans PEquiv.toMatrix_trans
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_bot [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] :
((⊥ : PEquiv m n).toMatrix : Matrix m n α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align pequiv.to_matrix_bot PEquiv.toMatrix_bot
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/PEquiv.lean | 123 | 139 | theorem toMatrix_injective [DecidableEq n] [MonoidWithZero α] [Nontrivial α] :
Function.Injective (@toMatrix m n α _ _ _) := by |
classical
intro f g
refine not_imp_not.1 ?_
simp only [Matrix.ext_iff.symm, toMatrix_apply, PEquiv.ext_iff, not_forall, exists_imp]
intro i hi
use i
cases' hf : f i with fi
· cases' hg : g i with gi
-- Porting note: was `cc`
· rw [hf, hg] at hi
exact (hi rfl).elim
· use gi
simp
· use fi
simp [hf.symm, Ne.symm hi]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Convergence
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.OptionalStopping
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Centering
#align_import probability.martingale.borel_cantelli from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma
This file proves Lévy's generalized Borel-Cantelli lemma which is a generalization of the
Borel-Cantelli lemmas. With this generalization, one can easily deduce the Borel-Cantelli lemmas
by choosing appropriate filtrations. This file also contains the one sided martingale bound which
is required to prove the generalized Borel-Cantelli.
**Note**: the usual Borel-Cantelli lemmas are not in this file. See
`MeasureTheory.measure_limsup_eq_zero` for the first (which does not depend on the results here),
and `ProbabilityTheory.measure_limsup_eq_one` for the second (which does).
## Main results
- `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto`: the one sided martingale bound: given
a submartingale `f` with uniformly bounded differences, the set for which `f` converges is almost
everywhere equal to the set for which it is bounded.
- `MeasureTheory.ae_mem_limsup_atTop_iff`: Lévy's generalized Borel-Cantelli:
given a filtration `ℱ` and a sequence of sets `s` such that `s n ∈ ℱ n` for all `n`,
`limsup atTop s` is almost everywhere equal to the set for which `∑ ℙ[s (n + 1)∣ℱ n] = ∞`.
-/
open Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory BigOperators Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω}
/-!
### One sided martingale bound
-/
-- TODO: `leastGE` should be defined taking values in `WithTop ℕ` once the `stoppedProcess`
-- refactor is complete
/-- `leastGE f r n` is the stopping time corresponding to the first time `f ≥ r`. -/
noncomputable def leastGE (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :=
hitting f (Set.Ici r) 0 n
#align measure_theory.least_ge MeasureTheory.leastGE
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (leastGE f r n) :=
hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Ici
#align measure_theory.adapted.is_stopping_time_least_ge MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE
theorem leastGE_le {i : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (ω : Ω) : leastGE f r i ω ≤ i :=
hitting_le ω
#align measure_theory.least_ge_le MeasureTheory.leastGE_le
-- The following four lemmas shows `leastGE` behaves like a stopped process. Ideally we should
-- define `leastGE` as a stopping time and take its stopped process. However, we can't do that
-- with our current definition since a stopping time takes only finite indicies. An upcomming
-- refactor should hopefully make it possible to have stopping times taking infinity as a value
theorem leastGE_mono {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (r : ℝ) (ω : Ω) : leastGE f r n ω ≤ leastGE f r m ω :=
hitting_mono hnm
#align measure_theory.least_ge_mono MeasureTheory.leastGE_mono
theorem leastGE_eq_min (π : Ω → ℕ) (r : ℝ) (ω : Ω) {n : ℕ} (hπn : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ n) :
leastGE f r (π ω) ω = min (π ω) (leastGE f r n ω) := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (le_min (leastGE_le _) (leastGE_mono (hπn ω) r ω)) ?_
by_cases hle : π ω ≤ leastGE f r n ω
· rw [min_eq_left hle, leastGE]
by_cases h : ∃ j ∈ Set.Icc 0 (π ω), f j ω ∈ Set.Ici r
· refine hle.trans (Eq.le ?_)
rw [leastGE, ← hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists (hπn ω) h]
· simp only [hitting, if_neg h, le_rfl]
· rw [min_eq_right (not_le.1 hle).le, leastGE, leastGE, ←
hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists (hπn ω) _]
rw [not_le, leastGE, hitting_lt_iff _ (hπn ω)] at hle
exact
let ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := hle
⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
#align measure_theory.least_ge_eq_min MeasureTheory.leastGE_eq_min
theorem stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (π : Ω → ℕ) (r : ℝ) {n : ℕ}
(hπn : ∀ ω, π ω ≤ n) : stoppedValue (fun i => stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) π =
stoppedValue (stoppedProcess f (leastGE f r n)) π := by
ext1 ω
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [stoppedProcess, stoppedValue]
rw [leastGE_eq_min _ _ _ hπn]
#align measure_theory.stopped_value_stopped_value_least_ge MeasureTheory.stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (r : ℝ) :
Submartingale (fun i => stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) ℱ μ := by
rw [submartingale_iff_expected_stoppedValue_mono]
· intro σ π hσ hπ hσ_le_π hπ_bdd
obtain ⟨n, hπ_le_n⟩ := hπ_bdd
simp_rw [stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE f σ r fun i => (hσ_le_π i).trans (hπ_le_n i)]
simp_rw [stoppedValue_stoppedValue_leastGE f π r hπ_le_n]
refine hf.expected_stoppedValue_mono ?_ ?_ ?_ fun ω => (min_le_left _ _).trans (hπ_le_n ω)
· exact hσ.min (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _)
· exact hπ.min (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _)
· exact fun ω => min_le_min (hσ_le_π ω) le_rfl
· exact fun i => stronglyMeasurable_stoppedValue_of_le hf.adapted.progMeasurable_of_discrete
(hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _) leastGE_le
· exact fun i => integrable_stoppedValue _ (hf.adapted.isStoppingTime_leastGE _ _) hf.integrable
leastGE_le
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE
variable {r : ℝ} {R : ℝ≥0}
theorem norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i) ω ≤ r + R := by
filter_upwards [hbdd] with ω hbddω
change f (leastGE f r i ω) ω ≤ r + R
by_cases heq : leastGE f r i ω = 0
· rw [heq, hf0, Pi.zero_apply]
exact add_nonneg hr R.coe_nonneg
· obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero heq
rw [hk, add_comm, ← sub_le_iff_le_add]
have := not_mem_of_lt_hitting (hk.symm ▸ k.lt_succ_self : k < leastGE f r i ω) (zero_le _)
simp only [Set.mem_union, Set.mem_Iic, Set.mem_Ici, not_or, not_le] at this
exact (sub_lt_sub_left this _).le.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (hbddω _))
#align measure_theory.norm_stopped_value_least_ge_le MeasureTheory.norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
snorm (stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) 1 μ ≤ 2 * μ Set.univ * ENNReal.ofReal (r + R) := by
refine snorm_one_le_of_le' ((hf.stoppedValue_leastGE r).integrable _) ?_
(norm_stoppedValue_leastGE_le hr hf0 hbdd i)
rw [← integral_univ]
refine le_trans ?_ ((hf.stoppedValue_leastGE r).setIntegral_le (zero_le _) MeasurableSet.univ)
simp_rw [stoppedValue, leastGE, hitting_of_le le_rfl, hf0, integral_zero', le_rfl]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge_snorm_le MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le
theorem Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hr : 0 ≤ r) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) (i : ℕ) :
snorm (stoppedValue f (leastGE f r i)) 1 μ ≤
ENNReal.toNNReal (2 * μ Set.univ * ENNReal.ofReal (r + R)) := by
refine (hf.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le hr hf0 hbdd i).trans ?_
simp [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (measure_ne_top μ _), ENNReal.coe_toNNReal]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.stopped_value_least_ge_snorm_le' MeasureTheory.Submartingale.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le'
/-- This lemma is superseded by `Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto`. -/
theorem Submartingale.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bddAbove_aux [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) (hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) → ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
have ht :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i : ℕ, ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => stoppedValue f (leastGE f i n) ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun i => Submartingale.exists_ae_tendsto_of_bdd (hf.stoppedValue_leastGE i)
(hf.stoppedValue_leastGE_snorm_le' i.cast_nonneg hf0 hbdd)
filter_upwards [ht] with ω hω hωb
rw [BddAbove] at hωb
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := exists_nat_gt hωb.some
have hib : ∀ n, f n ω < i := by
intro n
exact lt_of_le_of_lt ((mem_upperBounds.1 hωb.some_mem) _ ⟨n, rfl⟩) hi
have heq : ∀ n, stoppedValue f (leastGE f i n) ω = f n ω := by
intro n
rw [leastGE]; unfold hitting; rw [stoppedValue]
rw [if_neg]
simp only [Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_union, Set.mem_Ici]
push_neg
exact fun j _ => hib j
simp only [← heq, hω i]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bdd_above_aux MeasureTheory.Submartingale.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bddAbove_aux
theorem Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto_aux [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hf0 : f 0 = 0) (hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) ↔ ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
filter_upwards [hf.exists_tendsto_of_abs_bddAbove_aux hf0 hbdd] with ω hω using
⟨hω, fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => hc.bddAbove_range⟩
#align measure_theory.submartingale.bdd_above_iff_exists_tendsto_aux MeasureTheory.Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto_aux
/-- One sided martingale bound: If `f` is a submartingale which has uniformly bounded differences,
then for almost every `ω`, `f n ω` is bounded above (in `n`) if and only if it converges. -/
theorem Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) ↔ ∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
set g : ℕ → Ω → ℝ := fun n ω => f n ω - f 0 ω
have hg : Submartingale g ℱ μ :=
hf.sub_martingale (martingale_const_fun _ _ (hf.adapted 0) (hf.integrable 0))
have hg0 : g 0 = 0 := by
ext ω
simp only [g, sub_self, Pi.zero_apply]
have hgbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i : ℕ, |g (i + 1) ω - g i ω| ≤ ↑R := by
simpa only [g, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
filter_upwards [hg.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto_aux hg0 hgbdd] with ω hω
convert hω using 1
· refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h <;>
refine ⟨b + |f 0 ω|, fun y hy => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := hy
· simp_rw [g, sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_le_add (hb ⟨n, rfl⟩) (neg_le_abs _)
· exact sub_le_iff_le_add.1 (le_trans (sub_le_sub_left (le_abs_self _) _) (hb ⟨n, rfl⟩))
· refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩ <;> obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
· exact ⟨c - f 0 ω, hc.sub_const _⟩
· refine ⟨c + f 0 ω, ?_⟩
have := hc.add_const (f 0 ω)
simpa only [g, sub_add_cancel]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.bdd_above_iff_exists_tendsto MeasureTheory.Submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto
/-!
### Lévy's generalization of the Borel-Cantelli lemma
Lévy's generalization of the Borel-Cantelli lemma states that: given a natural number indexed
filtration $(\mathcal{F}_n)$, and a sequence of sets $(s_n)$ such that for all
$n$, $s_n \in \mathcal{F}_n$, $limsup_n s_n$ is almost everywhere equal to the set for which
$\sum_n \mathbb{P}[s_n \mid \mathcal{F}_n] = \infty$.
The proof strategy follows by constructing a martingale satisfying the one sided martingale bound.
In particular, we define
$$
f_n := \sum_{k < n} \mathbf{1}_{s_{n + 1}} - \mathbb{P}[s_{n + 1} \mid \mathcal{F}_n].
$$
Then, as a martingale is both a sub and a super-martingale, the set for which it is unbounded from
above must agree with the set for which it is unbounded from below almost everywhere. Thus, it
can only converge to $\pm \infty$ with probability 0. Thus, by considering
$$
\limsup_n s_n = \{\sum_n \mathbf{1}_{s_n} = \infty\}
$$
almost everywhere, the result follows.
-/
theorem Martingale.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, BddAbove (Set.range fun n => f n ω) ↔ BddBelow (Set.range fun n => f n ω) := by
have hbdd' : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |(-f) (i + 1) ω - (-f) i ω| ≤ R := by
filter_upwards [hbdd] with ω hω i
erw [← abs_neg, neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_add_eq_sub]
exact hω i
have hup := hf.submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto hbdd
have hdown := hf.neg.submartingale.bddAbove_iff_exists_tendsto hbdd'
filter_upwards [hup, hdown] with ω hω₁ hω₂
have : (∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop (𝓝 c)) ↔
∃ c, Tendsto (fun n => (-f) n ω) atTop (𝓝 c) := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
· exact ⟨-c, hc.neg⟩
· refine ⟨-c, ?_⟩
convert hc.neg
simp only [neg_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
rw [hω₁, this, ← hω₂]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨c, hc⟩ <;> refine ⟨-c, fun ω hω => ?_⟩
· rw [mem_upperBounds] at hc
refine neg_le.2 (hc _ ?_)
simpa only [Pi.neg_apply, Set.mem_range, neg_inj]
· rw [mem_lowerBounds] at hc
simp_rw [Set.mem_range, Pi.neg_apply, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hω
refine le_neg.1 (hc _ ?_)
simpa only [Set.mem_range]
#align measure_theory.martingale.bdd_above_range_iff_bdd_below_range MeasureTheory.Martingale.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range
theorem Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atTop [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ¬Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop atTop := by
filter_upwards [hf.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range hbdd] with ω hω htop using
unbounded_of_tendsto_atTop htop (hω.2 <| bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop htop)
#align measure_theory.martingale.ae_not_tendsto_at_top_at_top MeasureTheory.Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atTop
theorem Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atBot [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ)
(hbdd : ∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ∀ i, |f (i + 1) ω - f i ω| ≤ R) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, ¬Tendsto (fun n => f n ω) atTop atBot := by
filter_upwards [hf.bddAbove_range_iff_bddBelow_range hbdd] with ω hω htop using
unbounded_of_tendsto_atBot htop (hω.1 <| bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot htop)
#align measure_theory.martingale.ae_not_tendsto_at_top_at_bot MeasureTheory.Martingale.ae_not_tendsto_atTop_atBot
namespace BorelCantelli
/-- Auxiliary definition required to prove Lévy's generalization of the Borel-Cantelli lemmas for
which we will take the martingale part. -/
noncomputable def process (s : ℕ → Set Ω) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ℝ :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (s (k + 1)).indicator 1
#align measure_theory.borel_cantelli.process MeasureTheory.BorelCantelli.process
variable {s : ℕ → Set Ω}
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/BorelCantelli.lean | 287 | 287 | theorem process_zero : process s 0 = 0 := by | rw [process, Finset.range_zero, Finset.sum_empty]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Partrec
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
#align_import computability.partrec_code from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6155d4351090a6fad236e3d2e4e0e4e7342668e8"
/-!
# Gödel Numbering for Partial Recursive Functions.
This file defines `Nat.Partrec.Code`, an inductive datatype describing code for partial
recursive functions on ℕ. It defines an encoding for these codes, and proves that the constructors
are primitive recursive with respect to the encoding.
It also defines the evaluation of these codes as partial functions using `PFun`, and proves that a
function is partially recursive (as defined by `Nat.Partrec`) if and only if it is the evaluation
of some code.
## Main Definitions
* `Nat.Partrec.Code`: Inductive datatype for partial recursive codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`: A (computable) encoding of codes as natural numbers.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode`: The inverse of this encoding.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`: The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
## Main Results
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_computable`: Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.smn`: The $S_n^m$ theorem.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.exists_code`: Partial recursiveness is equivalent to being the eval of a code.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_prim`: `evaln` is primitive recursive.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.fixed_point`: Roger's fixed point theorem.
## References
* [Mario Carneiro, *Formalizing computability theory via partial recursive functions*][carneiro2019]
-/
open Encodable Denumerable
namespace Nat.Partrec
theorem rfind' {f} (hf : Nat.Partrec f) :
Nat.Partrec
(Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)) :=
Partrec₂.unpaired'.2 <| by
refine
Partrec.map
((@Partrec₂.unpaired' fun a b : ℕ =>
Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> f (Nat.pair a (n + b))).1
?_)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd <| Primrec.snd.comp Primrec.fst).to_comp.to₂
have : Nat.Partrec (fun a => Nat.rfind (fun n => (fun m => decide (m = 0)) <$>
Nat.unpaired (fun a b => f (Nat.pair (Nat.unpair a).1 (b + (Nat.unpair a).2)))
(Nat.pair a n))) :=
rfind
(Partrec₂.unpaired'.2
((Partrec.nat_iff.2 hf).comp
(Primrec₂.pair.comp (Primrec.fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst)
(Primrec.nat_add.comp Primrec.snd
(Primrec.snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp Primrec.fst))).to_comp))
simp at this; exact this
#align nat.partrec.rfind' Nat.Partrec.rfind'
/-- Code for partial recursive functions from ℕ to ℕ.
See `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval` for the interpretation of these constructors.
-/
inductive Code : Type
| zero : Code
| succ : Code
| left : Code
| right : Code
| pair : Code → Code → Code
| comp : Code → Code → Code
| prec : Code → Code → Code
| rfind' : Code → Code
#align nat.partrec.code Nat.Partrec.Code
-- Porting note: `Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn` is noncomputable in Lean4, so we make it computable.
compile_inductive% Code
end Nat.Partrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
instance instInhabited : Inhabited Code :=
⟨zero⟩
#align nat.partrec.code.inhabited Nat.Partrec.Code.instInhabited
/-- Returns a code for the constant function outputting a particular natural. -/
protected def const : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| n + 1 => comp succ (Code.const n)
#align nat.partrec.code.const Nat.Partrec.Code.const
theorem const_inj : ∀ {n₁ n₂}, Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₁ = Nat.Partrec.Code.const n₂ → n₁ = n₂
| 0, 0, _ => by simp
| n₁ + 1, n₂ + 1, h => by
dsimp [Nat.Partrec.Code.const] at h
injection h with h₁ h₂
simp only [const_inj h₂]
#align nat.partrec.code.const_inj Nat.Partrec.Code.const_inj
/-- A code for the identity function. -/
protected def id : Code :=
pair left right
#align nat.partrec.code.id Nat.Partrec.Code.id
/-- Given a code `c` taking a pair as input, returns a code using `n` as the first argument to `c`.
-/
def curry (c : Code) (n : ℕ) : Code :=
comp c (pair (Code.const n) Code.id)
#align nat.partrec.code.curry Nat.Partrec.Code.curry
-- Porting note: `bit0` and `bit1` are deprecated.
/-- An encoding of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a ℕ. -/
def encodeCode : Code → ℕ
| zero => 0
| succ => 1
| left => 2
| right => 3
| pair cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 4
| comp cf cg => 2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg) + 1) + 4
| prec cf cg => (2 * (2 * Nat.pair (encodeCode cf) (encodeCode cg)) + 1) + 4
| rfind' cf => (2 * (2 * encodeCode cf + 1) + 1) + 4
#align nat.partrec.code.encode_code Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode
/--
A decoder for `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`, taking any ℕ to the `Nat.Partrec.Code` it represents.
-/
def ofNatCode : ℕ → Code
| 0 => zero
| 1 => succ
| 2 => left
| 3 => right
| n + 4 =>
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
match n.bodd, n.div2.bodd with
| false, false => pair (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| false, true => comp (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , false => prec (ofNatCode m.unpair.1) (ofNatCode m.unpair.2)
| true , true => rfind' (ofNatCode m)
#align nat.partrec.code.of_nat_code Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode
/-- Proof that `Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode` is the inverse of `Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode`-/
private theorem encode_ofNatCode : ∀ n, encodeCode (ofNatCode n) = n
| 0 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 1 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 2 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| 3 => by simp [ofNatCode, encodeCode]
| n + 4 => by
let m := n.div2.div2
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (Nat.div_le_self _ _) (Nat.div_le_self _ _))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
have _m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have _m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
have IH := encode_ofNatCode m
have IH1 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.1
have IH2 := encode_ofNatCode m.unpair.2
conv_rhs => rw [← Nat.bit_decomp n, ← Nat.bit_decomp n.div2]
simp only [ofNatCode.eq_5]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;>
simp [encodeCode, ofNatCode, IH, IH1, IH2, Nat.bit_val]
instance instDenumerable : Denumerable Code :=
mk'
⟨encodeCode, ofNatCode, fun c => by
induction c <;> try {rfl} <;> simp [encodeCode, ofNatCode, Nat.div2_val, *],
encode_ofNatCode⟩
#align nat.partrec.code.denumerable Nat.Partrec.Code.instDenumerable
theorem encodeCode_eq : encode = encodeCode :=
rfl
#align nat.partrec.code.encode_code_eq Nat.Partrec.Code.encodeCode_eq
theorem ofNatCode_eq : ofNat Code = ofNatCode :=
rfl
#align nat.partrec.code.of_nat_code_eq Nat.Partrec.Code.ofNatCode_eq
theorem encode_lt_pair (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (pair cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (pair cf cg) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_right (Nat.pair cf.encodeCode cg.encodeCode) (by decide : 1 ≤ 2 * 2)
rw [one_mul, mul_assoc] at this
have := lt_of_le_of_lt this (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (by decide : 0 < 4))
exact ⟨lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.left_le_pair _ _) this, lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.right_le_pair _ _) this⟩
#align nat.partrec.code.encode_lt_pair Nat.Partrec.Code.encode_lt_pair
theorem encode_lt_comp (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (comp cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (comp cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (comp cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
#align nat.partrec.code.encode_lt_comp Nat.Partrec.Code.encode_lt_comp
theorem encode_lt_prec (cf cg) :
encode cf < encode (prec cf cg) ∧ encode cg < encode (prec cf cg) := by
have : encode (pair cf cg) < encode (prec cf cg) := by simp [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
exact (encode_lt_pair cf cg).imp (fun h => lt_trans h this) fun h => lt_trans h this
#align nat.partrec.code.encode_lt_prec Nat.Partrec.Code.encode_lt_prec
theorem encode_lt_rfind' (cf) : encode cf < encode (rfind' cf) := by
simp only [encodeCode_eq, encodeCode]
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_right cf.encodeCode (by decide : 1 ≤ 2 * 2)
rw [one_mul, mul_assoc] at this
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans this ?_) (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (by decide : 0 < 4))
exact le_of_lt (Nat.lt_succ_of_le <| Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_of_lt <|
Nat.lt_succ_of_le <| Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_rfl)
#align nat.partrec.code.encode_lt_rfind' Nat.Partrec.Code.encode_lt_rfind'
end Nat.Partrec.Code
-- Porting note: Opening `Primrec` inside `namespace Nat.Partrec.Code` causes it to resolve
-- to `Nat.Partrec`. Needs `open _root_.Partrec` support
section
open Primrec
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
theorem pair_prim : Primrec₂ pair :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
#align nat.partrec.code.pair_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.pair_prim
theorem comp_prim : Primrec₂ comp :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double.comp <|
nat_double_succ.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
#align nat.partrec.code.comp_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.comp_prim
theorem prec_prim : Primrec₂ prec :=
Primrec₂.ofNat_iff.2 <|
Primrec₂.encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double_succ.comp <|
nat_double.comp <|
Primrec₂.natPair.comp (encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp fst)
(encode_iff.2 <| (Primrec.ofNat Code).comp snd))
(Primrec₂.const 4)
#align nat.partrec.code.prec_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.prec_prim
theorem rfind_prim : Primrec rfind' :=
ofNat_iff.2 <|
encode_iff.1 <|
nat_add.comp
(nat_double_succ.comp <| nat_double_succ.comp <|
encode_iff.2 <| Primrec.ofNat Code)
(const 4)
#align nat.partrec.code.rfind_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.rfind_prim
theorem rec_prim' {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Primrec c) {z : α → σ}
(hz : Primrec z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Primrec s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Primrec l) {r : α → σ}
(hr : Primrec r) {pr : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hpr : Primrec₂ pr)
{co : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hco : Primrec₂ co) {pc : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ}
(hpc : Primrec₂ pc) {rf : α → Code × σ → σ} (hrf : Primrec₂ rf) :
let PR (a) cf cg hf hg := pr a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let CO (a) cf cg hf hg := co a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let PC (a) cf cg hf hg := pc a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let RF (a) cf hf := rf a (cf, hf)
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (PR a) (CO a) (PC a) (RF a)
Primrec (fun a => F a (c a) : α → σ) := by
intros _ _ _ _ F
let G₁ : (α × List σ) × ℕ × ℕ → Option σ := fun p =>
letI a := p.1.1; letI IH := p.1.2; letI n := p.2.1; letI m := p.2.2
(IH.get? m).bind fun s =>
(IH.get? m.unpair.1).bind fun s₁ =>
(IH.get? m.unpair.2).map fun s₂ =>
cond n.bodd
(cond n.div2.bodd (rf a (ofNat Code m, s))
(pc a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
(cond n.div2.bodd (co a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂))
(pr a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
have : Primrec G₁ :=
option_bind (list_get?.comp (snd.comp fst) (snd.comp snd)) <| .mk <|
option_bind ((list_get?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(fst.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp fst) <| .mk <|
option_map ((list_get?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(snd.comp <| Primrec.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp <| fst.comp fst) <| .mk <|
have a := fst.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have n := fst.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m := snd.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m₁ := fst.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp m)
have m₂ := snd.comp (Primrec.unpair.comp m)
have s := snd.comp (fst.comp fst)
have s₁ := snd.comp fst
have s₂ := snd
(nat_bodd.comp n).cond
((nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n).cond
(hrf.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m).pair s))
(hpc.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
(Primrec.cond (nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n)
(hco.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂))
(hpr.comp a (((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Primrec.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
let G : α → List σ → Option σ := fun a IH =>
IH.length.casesOn (some (z a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (s a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (l a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (r a)) fun n =>
G₁ ((a, IH), n, n.div2.div2)
have : Primrec₂ G := .mk <|
nat_casesOn (list_length.comp snd) (option_some_iff.2 (hz.comp fst)) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hs.comp (fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hl.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hr.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
this.comp <|
((fst.pair snd).comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst).pair <|
snd.pair <| nat_div2.comp <| nat_div2.comp snd
refine (nat_strong_rec (fun a n => F a (ofNat Code n)) this.to₂ fun a n => ?_)
|>.comp .id (encode_iff.2 hc) |>.of_eq fun a => by simp
simp
iterate 4 cases' n with n; · simp [ofNatCode_eq, ofNatCode]; rfl
simp only [G]; rw [List.length_map, List.length_range]
let m := n.div2.div2
show G₁ ((a, (List.range (n + 4)).map fun n => F a (ofNat Code n)), n, m)
= some (F a (ofNat Code (n + 4)))
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_trans (Nat.div_le_self ..) (Nat.div_le_self ..))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right ..))
have m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
simp [G₁]; simp [m, List.get?_map, List.get?_range, hm, m1, m2]
rw [show ofNat Code (n + 4) = ofNatCode (n + 4) from rfl]
simp [ofNatCode]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;> rfl
#align nat.partrec.code.rec_prim' Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim'
/-- Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is primitive recursive. -/
theorem rec_prim {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Primrec c) {z : α → σ}
(hz : Primrec z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Primrec s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Primrec l) {r : α → σ}
(hr : Primrec r) {pr : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hpr : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => pr a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{co : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hco : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => co a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{pc : α → Code → Code → σ → σ → σ}
(hpc : Primrec fun a : α × Code × Code × σ × σ => pc a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.1 a.2.2.2.2)
{rf : α → Code → σ → σ} (hrf : Primrec fun a : α × Code × σ => rf a.1 a.2.1 a.2.2) :
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (pr a) (co a) (pc a) (rf a)
Primrec fun a => F a (c a) :=
rec_prim' hc hz hs hl hr
(pr := fun a b => pr a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hpr)
(co := fun a b => co a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hco)
(pc := fun a b => pc a b.1 b.2.1 b.2.2.1 b.2.2.2) (.mk hpc)
(rf := fun a b => rf a b.1 b.2) (.mk hrf)
#align nat.partrec.code.rec_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_prim
end Nat.Partrec.Code
end
namespace Nat.Partrec.Code
section
open Computable
/-- Recursion on `Nat.Partrec.Code` is computable. -/
theorem rec_computable {α σ} [Primcodable α] [Primcodable σ] {c : α → Code} (hc : Computable c)
{z : α → σ} (hz : Computable z) {s : α → σ} (hs : Computable s) {l : α → σ} (hl : Computable l)
{r : α → σ} (hr : Computable r) {pr : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hpr : Computable₂ pr)
{co : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ} (hco : Computable₂ co) {pc : α → Code × Code × σ × σ → σ}
(hpc : Computable₂ pc) {rf : α → Code × σ → σ} (hrf : Computable₂ rf) :
let PR (a) cf cg hf hg := pr a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let CO (a) cf cg hf hg := co a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let PC (a) cf cg hf hg := pc a (cf, cg, hf, hg)
let RF (a) cf hf := rf a (cf, hf)
let F (a : α) (c : Code) : σ :=
Nat.Partrec.Code.recOn c (z a) (s a) (l a) (r a) (PR a) (CO a) (PC a) (RF a)
Computable fun a => F a (c a) := by
-- TODO(Mario): less copy-paste from previous proof
intros _ _ _ _ F
let G₁ : (α × List σ) × ℕ × ℕ → Option σ := fun p =>
letI a := p.1.1; letI IH := p.1.2; letI n := p.2.1; letI m := p.2.2
(IH.get? m).bind fun s =>
(IH.get? m.unpair.1).bind fun s₁ =>
(IH.get? m.unpair.2).map fun s₂ =>
cond n.bodd
(cond n.div2.bodd (rf a (ofNat Code m, s))
(pc a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
(cond n.div2.bodd (co a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂))
(pr a (ofNat Code m.unpair.1, ofNat Code m.unpair.2, s₁, s₂)))
have : Computable G₁ := by
refine option_bind (list_get?.comp (snd.comp fst) (snd.comp snd)) <| .mk ?_
refine option_bind ((list_get?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(fst.comp <| Computable.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp fst) <| .mk ?_
refine option_map ((list_get?.comp (snd.comp fst)
(snd.comp <| Computable.unpair.comp (snd.comp snd))).comp <| fst.comp fst) <| .mk ?_
exact
have a := fst.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have n := fst.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m := snd.comp (snd.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst)
have m₁ := fst.comp (Computable.unpair.comp m)
have m₂ := snd.comp (Computable.unpair.comp m)
have s := snd.comp (fst.comp fst)
have s₁ := snd.comp fst
have s₂ := snd
(nat_bodd.comp n).cond
((nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n).cond
(hrf.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m).pair s))
(hpc.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
(Computable.cond (nat_bodd.comp <| nat_div2.comp n)
(hco.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂))
(hpr.comp a (((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₁).pair <|
((Computable.ofNat Code).comp m₂).pair <| s₁.pair s₂)))
let G : α → List σ → Option σ := fun a IH =>
IH.length.casesOn (some (z a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (s a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (l a)) fun n =>
n.casesOn (some (r a)) fun n =>
G₁ ((a, IH), n, n.div2.div2)
have : Computable₂ G := .mk <|
nat_casesOn (list_length.comp snd) (option_some_iff.2 (hz.comp fst)) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hs.comp (fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hl.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
nat_casesOn snd (option_some_iff.2 (hr.comp (fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp fst))) <| .mk <|
this.comp <|
((fst.pair snd).comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst.comp <| fst).pair <|
snd.pair <| nat_div2.comp <| nat_div2.comp snd
refine (nat_strong_rec (fun a n => F a (ofNat Code n)) this.to₂ fun a n => ?_)
|>.comp .id (encode_iff.2 hc) |>.of_eq fun a => by simp
simp
iterate 4 cases' n with n; · simp [ofNatCode_eq, ofNatCode]; rfl
simp only [G]; rw [List.length_map, List.length_range]
let m := n.div2.div2
show G₁ ((a, (List.range (n + 4)).map fun n => F a (ofNat Code n)), n, m)
= some (F a (ofNat Code (n + 4)))
have hm : m < n + 4 := by
simp only [m, div2_val]
exact lt_of_le_of_lt
(le_trans (Nat.div_le_self ..) (Nat.div_le_self ..))
(Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.le_add_right ..))
have m1 : m.unpair.1 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_left_le hm
have m2 : m.unpair.2 < n + 4 := lt_of_le_of_lt m.unpair_right_le hm
simp [G₁]; simp [m, List.get?_map, List.get?_range, hm, m1, m2]
rw [show ofNat Code (n + 4) = ofNatCode (n + 4) from rfl]
simp [ofNatCode]
cases n.bodd <;> cases n.div2.bodd <;> rfl
#align nat.partrec.code.rec_computable Nat.Partrec.Code.rec_computable
end
/-- The interpretation of a `Nat.Partrec.Code` as a partial function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.zero`: The constant zero function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.succ`: The successor function.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.left`: Left unpairing of a pair of ℕ (encoded by `Nat.pair`)
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.right`: Right unpairing of a pair of ℕ (encoded by `Nat.pair`)
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.pair`: Pairs the outputs of argument codes using `Nat.pair`.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.comp`: Composition of two argument codes.
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.prec`: Primitive recursion. Given an argument of the form `Nat.pair a n`:
* If `n = 0`, returns `eval cf a`.
* If `n = succ k`, returns `eval cg (pair a (pair k (eval (prec cf cg) (pair a k))))`
* `Nat.Partrec.Code.rfind'`: Minimization. For `f` an argument of the form `Nat.pair a m`,
`rfind' f m` returns the least `a` such that `f a m = 0`, if one exists and `f b m` terminates
for `b < a`
-/
def eval : Code → ℕ →. ℕ
| zero => pure 0
| succ => Nat.succ
| left => ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.1
| right => ↑fun n : ℕ => n.unpair.2
| pair cf cg => fun n => Nat.pair <$> eval cf n <*> eval cg n
| comp cf cg => fun n => eval cg n >>= eval cf
| prec cf cg =>
Nat.unpaired fun a n =>
n.rec (eval cf a) fun y IH => do
let i ← IH
eval cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))
| rfind' cf =>
Nat.unpaired fun a m =>
(Nat.rfind fun n => (fun m => m = 0) <$> eval cf (Nat.pair a (n + m))).map (· + m)
#align nat.partrec.code.eval Nat.Partrec.Code.eval
/-- Helper lemma for the evaluation of `prec` in the base case. -/
@[simp]
theorem eval_prec_zero (cf cg : Code) (a : ℕ) : eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a 0) = eval cf a := by
rw [eval, Nat.unpaired, Nat.unpair_pair]
simp (config := { Lean.Meta.Simp.neutralConfig with proj := true }) only []
rw [Nat.rec_zero]
#align nat.partrec.code.eval_prec_zero Nat.Partrec.Code.eval_prec_zero
/-- Helper lemma for the evaluation of `prec` in the recursive case. -/
theorem eval_prec_succ (cf cg : Code) (a k : ℕ) :
eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a (Nat.succ k)) =
do {let ih ← eval (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a k); eval cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair k ih))} := by
rw [eval, Nat.unpaired, Part.bind_eq_bind, Nat.unpair_pair]
simp
#align nat.partrec.code.eval_prec_succ Nat.Partrec.Code.eval_prec_succ
instance : Membership (ℕ →. ℕ) Code :=
⟨fun f c => eval c = f⟩
@[simp]
theorem eval_const : ∀ n m, eval (Code.const n) m = Part.some n
| 0, m => rfl
| n + 1, m => by simp! [eval_const n m]
#align nat.partrec.code.eval_const Nat.Partrec.Code.eval_const
@[simp]
theorem eval_id (n) : eval Code.id n = Part.some n := by simp! [Seq.seq]
#align nat.partrec.code.eval_id Nat.Partrec.Code.eval_id
@[simp]
theorem eval_curry (c n x) : eval (curry c n) x = eval c (Nat.pair n x) := by simp! [Seq.seq]
#align nat.partrec.code.eval_curry Nat.Partrec.Code.eval_curry
theorem const_prim : Primrec Code.const :=
(_root_.Primrec.id.nat_iterate (_root_.Primrec.const zero)
(comp_prim.comp (_root_.Primrec.const succ) Primrec.snd).to₂).of_eq
fun n => by simp; induction n <;>
simp [*, Code.const, Function.iterate_succ', -Function.iterate_succ]
#align nat.partrec.code.const_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.const_prim
theorem curry_prim : Primrec₂ curry :=
comp_prim.comp Primrec.fst <| pair_prim.comp (const_prim.comp Primrec.snd)
(_root_.Primrec.const Code.id)
#align nat.partrec.code.curry_prim Nat.Partrec.Code.curry_prim
theorem curry_inj {c₁ c₂ n₁ n₂} (h : curry c₁ n₁ = curry c₂ n₂) : c₁ = c₂ ∧ n₁ = n₂ :=
⟨by injection h, by
injection h with h₁ h₂
injection h₂ with h₃ h₄
exact const_inj h₃⟩
#align nat.partrec.code.curry_inj Nat.Partrec.Code.curry_inj
/--
The $S_n^m$ theorem: There is a computable function, namely `Nat.Partrec.Code.curry`, that takes a
program and a ℕ `n`, and returns a new program using `n` as the first argument.
-/
theorem smn :
∃ f : Code → ℕ → Code, Computable₂ f ∧ ∀ c n x, eval (f c n) x = eval c (Nat.pair n x) :=
⟨curry, Primrec₂.to_comp curry_prim, eval_curry⟩
#align nat.partrec.code.smn Nat.Partrec.Code.smn
/-- A function is partial recursive if and only if there is a code implementing it. Therefore,
`eval` is a **universal partial recursive function**. -/
theorem exists_code {f : ℕ →. ℕ} : Nat.Partrec f ↔ ∃ c : Code, eval c = f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· induction h with
| zero => exact ⟨zero, rfl⟩
| succ => exact ⟨succ, rfl⟩
| left => exact ⟨left, rfl⟩
| right => exact ⟨right, rfl⟩
| pair pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨pair cf cg, rfl⟩
| comp pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨comp cf cg, rfl⟩
| prec pf pg hf hg =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩; rcases hg with ⟨cg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨prec cf cg, rfl⟩
| rfind pf hf =>
rcases hf with ⟨cf, rfl⟩
refine ⟨comp (rfind' cf) (pair Code.id zero), ?_⟩
simp [eval, Seq.seq, pure, PFun.pure, Part.map_id']
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
induction c with
| zero => exact Nat.Partrec.zero
| succ => exact Nat.Partrec.succ
| left => exact Nat.Partrec.left
| right => exact Nat.Partrec.right
| pair cf cg pf pg => exact pf.pair pg
| comp cf cg pf pg => exact pf.comp pg
| prec cf cg pf pg => exact pf.prec pg
| rfind' cf pf => exact pf.rfind'
#align nat.partrec.code.exists_code Nat.Partrec.Code.exists_code
-- Porting note: `>>`s in `evaln` are now `>>=` because `>>`s are not elaborated well in Lean4.
/-- A modified evaluation for the code which returns an `Option ℕ` instead of a `Part ℕ`. To avoid
undecidability, `evaln` takes a parameter `k` and fails if it encounters a number ≥ k in the course
of its execution. Other than this, the semantics are the same as in `Nat.Partrec.Code.eval`.
-/
def evaln : ℕ → Code → ℕ → Option ℕ
| 0, _ => fun _ => Option.none
| k + 1, zero => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return 0
| k + 1, succ => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return (Nat.succ n)
| k + 1, left => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
return n.unpair.1
| k + 1, right => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
pure n.unpair.2
| k + 1, pair cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
Nat.pair <$> evaln (k + 1) cf n <*> evaln (k + 1) cg n
| k + 1, comp cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
let x ← evaln (k + 1) cg n
evaln (k + 1) cf x
| k + 1, prec cf cg => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
n.unpaired fun a n =>
n.casesOn (evaln (k + 1) cf a) fun y => do
let i ← evaln k (prec cf cg) (Nat.pair a y)
evaln (k + 1) cg (Nat.pair a (Nat.pair y i))
| k + 1, rfind' cf => fun n => do
guard (n ≤ k)
n.unpaired fun a m => do
let x ← evaln (k + 1) cf (Nat.pair a m)
if x = 0 then
pure m
else
evaln k (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair a (m + 1))
#align nat.partrec.code.evaln Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln
theorem evaln_bound : ∀ {k c n x}, x ∈ evaln k c n → n < k
| 0, c, n, x, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, c, n, x, h => by
suffices ∀ {o : Option ℕ}, x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k); o } → n < k + 1 by
cases c <;> rw [evaln] at h <;> exact this h
simpa [Option.bind_eq_some] using Nat.lt_succ_of_le
#align nat.partrec.code.evaln_bound Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_bound
theorem evaln_mono : ∀ {k₁ k₂ c n x}, k₁ ≤ k₂ → x ∈ evaln k₁ c n → x ∈ evaln k₂ c n
| 0, k₂, c, n, x, _, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, k₂ + 1, c, n, x, hl, h => by
have hl' := Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hl
have :
∀ {k k₂ n x : ℕ} {o₁ o₂ : Option ℕ},
k ≤ k₂ → (x ∈ o₁ → x ∈ o₂) →
x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k); o₁ } → x ∈ do { guard (n ≤ k₂); o₂ } := by
simp only [Option.mem_def, bind, Option.bind_eq_some, Option.guard_eq_some', exists_and_left,
exists_const, and_imp]
introv h h₁ h₂ h₃
exact ⟨le_trans h₂ h, h₁ h₃⟩
simp? at h ⊢ says simp only [Option.mem_def] at h ⊢
induction' c with cf cg hf hg cf cg hf hg cf cg hf hg cf hf generalizing x n <;>
rw [evaln] at h ⊢ <;> refine this hl' (fun h => ?_) h
iterate 4 exact h
· -- pair cf cg
simp? [Seq.seq, Option.bind_eq_some] at h ⊢ says
simp only [Seq.seq, Option.map_eq_map, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some,
Option.map_eq_some', exists_exists_and_eq_and] at h ⊢
exact h.imp fun a => And.imp (hf _ _) <| Exists.imp fun b => And.imp_left (hg _ _)
· -- comp cf cg
simp? [Bind.bind, Option.bind_eq_some] at h ⊢ says
simp only [bind, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some] at h ⊢
exact h.imp fun a => And.imp (hg _ _) (hf _ _)
· -- prec cf cg
revert h
simp only [unpaired, bind, Option.mem_def]
induction n.unpair.2 <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some]
· apply hf
· exact fun y h₁ h₂ => ⟨y, evaln_mono hl' h₁, hg _ _ h₂⟩
· -- rfind' cf
simp? [Bind.bind, Option.bind_eq_some] at h ⊢ says
simp only [unpaired, bind, pair_unpair, Option.pure_def, Option.mem_def,
Option.bind_eq_some] at h ⊢
refine h.imp fun x => And.imp (hf _ _) ?_
by_cases x0 : x = 0 <;> simp [x0]
exact evaln_mono hl'
#align nat.partrec.code.evaln_mono Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_mono
theorem evaln_sound : ∀ {k c n x}, x ∈ evaln k c n → x ∈ eval c n
| 0, _, n, x, h => by simp [evaln] at h
| k + 1, c, n, x, h => by
induction' c with cf cg hf hg cf cg hf hg cf cg hf hg cf hf generalizing x n <;>
simp [eval, evaln, Option.bind_eq_some, Seq.seq] at h ⊢ <;>
cases' h with _ h
iterate 4 simpa [pure, PFun.pure, eq_comm] using h
· -- pair cf cg
rcases h with ⟨y, ef, z, eg, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, hf _ _ ef, _, hg _ _ eg, rfl⟩
· --comp hf hg
rcases h with ⟨y, eg, ef⟩
exact ⟨_, hg _ _ eg, hf _ _ ef⟩
· -- prec cf cg
revert h
induction' n.unpair.2 with m IH generalizing x <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some]
· apply hf
· refine fun y h₁ h₂ => ⟨y, IH _ ?_, ?_⟩
· have := evaln_mono k.le_succ h₁
simp [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some] at this
exact this.2
· exact hg _ _ h₂
· -- rfind' cf
rcases h with ⟨m, h₁, h₂⟩
by_cases m0 : m = 0 <;> simp [m0] at h₂
· exact
⟨0, ⟨by simpa [m0] using hf _ _ h₁, fun {m} => (Nat.not_lt_zero _).elim⟩, by simp [h₂]⟩
· have := evaln_sound h₂
simp [eval] at this
rcases this with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
refine
⟨y + 1, ⟨by simpa [add_comm, add_left_comm] using hy₁, fun {i} im => ?_⟩, by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]⟩
cases' i with i
· exact ⟨m, by simpa using hf _ _ h₁, m0⟩
· rcases hy₂ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ im) with ⟨z, hz, z0⟩
exact ⟨z, by simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using hz, z0⟩
#align nat.partrec.code.evaln_sound Nat.Partrec.Code.evaln_sound
| Mathlib/Computability/PartrecCode.lean | 729 | 795 | theorem evaln_complete {c n x} : x ∈ eval c n ↔ ∃ k, x ∈ evaln k c n := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨k, h⟩ => evaln_sound h⟩
rsuffices ⟨k, h⟩ : ∃ k, x ∈ evaln (k + 1) c n
· exact ⟨k + 1, h⟩
induction c generalizing n x with
simp [eval, evaln, pure, PFun.pure, Seq.seq, Option.bind_eq_some] at h ⊢
| pair cf cg hf hg =>
rcases h with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
rcases hf hx with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hg hy with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine ⟨max k₁ k₂, ?_⟩
refine
⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂, rfl⟩
| comp cf cg hf hg =>
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rcases hg hy with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hf hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine ⟨max k₁ k₂, ?_⟩
exact
⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
| prec cf cg hf hg =>
revert h
generalize n.unpair.1 = n₁; generalize n.unpair.2 = n₂
induction' n₂ with m IH generalizing x n <;> simp [Option.bind_eq_some]
· intro h
rcases hf h with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨_, le_max_left _ _, evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk⟩
· intro y hy hx
rcases IH hy with ⟨k₁, nk₁, hk₁⟩
rcases hg hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
refine
⟨(max k₁ k₂).succ,
Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <|
le_trans (le_max_left _ (Nat.pair n₁ m)) nk₁, y,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) ?_,
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
simp only [evaln.eq_8, bind, unpaired, unpair_pair, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some,
Option.guard_eq_some', exists_and_left, exists_const]
exact ⟨le_trans (le_max_right _ _) nk₁, hk₁⟩
| rfind' cf hf =>
rcases h with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
suffices ∃ k, y + n.unpair.2 ∈ evaln (k + 1) (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2) by
simpa [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some]
revert hy₁ hy₂
generalize n.unpair.2 = m
intro hy₁ hy₂
induction' y with y IH generalizing m <;> simp [evaln, Option.bind_eq_some]
· simp at hy₁
rcases hf hy₁ with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨_, Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk, _, hk, by simp⟩
· rcases hy₂ (Nat.succ_pos _) with ⟨a, ha, a0⟩
rcases hf ha with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩
rcases IH m.succ (by simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using hy₁)
fun {i} hi => by
simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, add_left_comm] using
hy₂ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hi) with
⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
use (max k₁ k₂).succ
rw [zero_add] at hk₁
use Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁
use a
use evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁
simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, a0, -max_eq_left, -max_eq_right, add_comm, add_left_comm] using
evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂
| _ => exact ⟨⟨_, le_rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.AddCharacter
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.ZModChar
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.CharAndCard
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.gauss_sum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3f4be1fcb5376c4948d7f095bec45350bfb9d1a"
/-!
# Gauss sums
We define the Gauss sum associated to a multiplicative and an additive
character of a finite field and prove some results about them.
## Main definition
Let `R` be a finite commutative ring and let `R'` be another commutative ring.
If `χ` is a multiplicative character `R → R'` (type `MulChar R R'`) and `ψ`
is an additive character `R → R'` (type `AddChar R R'`, which abbreviates
`(Multiplicative R) →* R'`), then the *Gauss sum* of `χ` and `ψ` is `∑ a, χ a * ψ a`.
## Main results
Some important results are as follows.
* `gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card`: The product of the Gauss
sums of `χ` and `ψ` and that of `χ⁻¹` and `ψ⁻¹` is the cardinality
of the source ring `R` (if `χ` is nontrivial, `ψ` is primitive and `R` is a field).
* `gaussSum_sq`: The square of the Gauss sum is `χ(-1)` times
the cardinality of `R` if in addition `χ` is a quadratic character.
* `MulChar.IsQuadratic.gaussSum_frob`: For a quadratic character `χ`, raising
the Gauss sum to the `p`th power (where `p` is the characteristic of
the target ring `R'`) multiplies it by `χ p`.
* `Char.card_pow_card`: When `F` and `F'` are finite fields and `χ : F → F'`
is a nontrivial quadratic character, then `(χ (-1) * #F)^(#F'/2) = χ #F'`.
* `FiniteField.two_pow_card`: For every finite field `F` of odd characteristic,
we have `2^(#F/2) = χ₈#F` in `F`.
This machinery can be used to derive (a generalization of) the Law of
Quadratic Reciprocity.
## Tags
additive character, multiplicative character, Gauss sum
-/
universe u v
open AddChar MulChar
section GaussSumDef
-- `R` is the domain of the characters
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [Fintype R]
-- `R'` is the target of the characters
variable {R' : Type v} [CommRing R']
/-!
### Definition and first properties
-/
/-- Definition of the Gauss sum associated to a multiplicative and an additive character. -/
def gaussSum (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') : R' :=
∑ a, χ a * ψ a
#align gauss_sum gaussSum
/-- Replacing `ψ` by `mulShift ψ a` and multiplying the Gauss sum by `χ a` does not change it. -/
theorem gaussSum_mulShift (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') (a : Rˣ) :
χ a * gaussSum χ (mulShift ψ a) = gaussSum χ ψ := by
simp only [gaussSum, mulShift_apply, Finset.mul_sum]
simp_rw [← mul_assoc, ← map_mul]
exact Fintype.sum_bijective _ a.mulLeft_bijective _ _ fun x => rfl
#align gauss_sum_mul_shift gaussSum_mulShift
end GaussSumDef
/-!
### The product of two Gauss sums
-/
section GaussSumProd
-- In the following, we need `R` to be a finite field and `R'` to be a domain.
variable {R : Type u} [Field R] [Fintype R] {R' : Type v} [CommRing R'] [IsDomain R']
-- A helper lemma for `gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card` below
-- Is this useful enough in other contexts to be public?
private theorem gaussSum_mul_aux {χ : MulChar R R'} (hχ : IsNontrivial χ) (ψ : AddChar R R')
(b : R) : ∑ a, χ (a * b⁻¹) * ψ (a - b) = ∑ c, χ c * ψ (b * (c - 1)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· -- case `b = 0`
simp only [hb, inv_zero, mul_zero, MulChar.map_zero, zero_mul,
Finset.sum_const_zero, map_zero_eq_one, mul_one]
exact (hχ.sum_eq_zero).symm
· -- case `b ≠ 0`
refine (Fintype.sum_bijective _ (mulLeft_bijective₀ b hb) _ _ fun x => ?_).symm
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm x, ← mul_assoc, mul_inv_cancel hb, one_mul, mul_sub, mul_one]
/-- We have `gaussSum χ ψ * gaussSum χ⁻¹ ψ⁻¹ = Fintype.card R`
when `χ` is nontrivial and `ψ` is primitive (and `R` is a field). -/
theorem gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card {χ : MulChar R R'} (hχ : IsNontrivial χ) {ψ : AddChar R R'}
(hψ : IsPrimitive ψ) : gaussSum χ ψ * gaussSum χ⁻¹ ψ⁻¹ = Fintype.card R := by
simp only [gaussSum, AddChar.inv_apply, Finset.sum_mul, Finset.mul_sum, MulChar.inv_apply']
conv =>
lhs; congr; next => skip
ext; congr; next => skip
ext
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← map_mul, ← map_add_eq_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- conv in _ * _ * (_ * _) => rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← map_mul, ← map_add_eq_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp_rw [gaussSum_mul_aux hχ ψ]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
classical -- to get `[DecidableEq R]` for `sum_mulShift`
simp_rw [← Finset.mul_sum, sum_mulShift _ hψ, sub_eq_zero, apply_ite, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
rw [Finset.sum_ite_eq' Finset.univ (1 : R)]
simp only [Finset.mem_univ, map_one, one_mul, if_true]
#align gauss_sum_mul_gauss_sum_eq_card gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card
/-- When `χ` is a nontrivial quadratic character, then the square of `gaussSum χ ψ`
is `χ(-1)` times the cardinality of `R`. -/
theorem gaussSum_sq {χ : MulChar R R'} (hχ₁ : IsNontrivial χ) (hχ₂ : IsQuadratic χ)
{ψ : AddChar R R'} (hψ : IsPrimitive ψ) : gaussSum χ ψ ^ 2 = χ (-1) * Fintype.card R := by
rw [pow_two, ← gaussSum_mul_gaussSum_eq_card hχ₁ hψ, hχ₂.inv, mul_rotate']
congr
rw [mul_comm, ← gaussSum_mulShift _ _ (-1 : Rˣ), inv_mulShift]
rfl
#align gauss_sum_sq gaussSum_sq
end GaussSumProd
/-!
### Gauss sums and Frobenius
-/
section gaussSum_frob
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [Fintype R] {R' : Type v} [CommRing R']
-- We assume that the target ring `R'` has prime characteristic `p`.
variable (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] [hch : CharP R' p]
/-- When `R'` has prime characteristic `p`, then the `p`th power of the Gauss sum
of `χ` and `ψ` is the Gauss sum of `χ^p` and `ψ^p`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/GaussSum.lean | 151 | 155 | theorem gaussSum_frob (χ : MulChar R R') (ψ : AddChar R R') :
gaussSum χ ψ ^ p = gaussSum (χ ^ p) (ψ ^ p) := by |
rw [← frobenius_def, gaussSum, gaussSum, map_sum]
simp_rw [pow_apply' χ fp.1.ne_zero, map_mul, frobenius_def]
rfl
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.