Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
#align_import probability.martingale.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba074af83b6cf54c3104e59402b39410ddbd6dca"
/-!
# Martingales
A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if every
`f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. On the other hand, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a supermartingale
with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with resepct to `ℱ`
and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. Finally, `f : ι → Ω → E` is said to be a
submartingale with respect to the filtration `ℱ` if `f i` is integrable, `f` is adapted with
resepct to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ i]`.
The definitions of filtration and adapted can be found in `Probability.Process.Stopping`.
### Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.Martingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a martingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Supermartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a supermartingale with respect to
filtration `ℱ` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale f ℱ μ`: `f` is a submartingale with respect to filtration `ℱ` and
measure `μ`.
### Results
* `MeasureTheory.martingale_condexp f ℱ μ`: the sequence `fun i => μ[f | ℱ i, ℱ.le i])` is a
martingale with respect to `ℱ` and `μ`.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
/-- A family of functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a martingale with respect to a filtration `ℱ` if `f`
is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`, `μ[f j | ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
#align measure_theory.martingale MeasureTheory.Martingale
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a supermartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`μ[f j | ℱ.le i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i`. -/
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.supermartingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale
/-- A family of integrable functions `f : ι → Ω → E` is a submartingale with respect to a
filtration `ℱ` if `f` is adapted with respect to `ℱ` and for all `i ≤ j`,
`f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j | ℱ.le i]`. -/
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.submartingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condexp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_const MeasureTheory.martingale_const
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
#align measure_theory.martingale_const_fun MeasureTheory.martingale_const_fun
variable (E)
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condexp_zero]; simp⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_zero MeasureTheory.martingale_zero
variable {E}
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.martingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Martingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.martingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Martingale.stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
#align measure_theory.martingale.condexp_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.condexp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condexp.congr (hf.condexp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
#align measure_theory.martingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Martingale.integrable
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← @setIntegral_condexp _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) m0 _ _ _ (ℱ.le i) _ (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
#align measure_theory.martingale.set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq := setIntegral_eq
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 119 | 121 | theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by |
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Canonical
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Set.List
import Mathlib.Init.Quot
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
#align_import data.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Multisets
These are implemented as the quotient of a list by permutations.
## Notation
We define the global infix notation `::ₘ` for `Multiset.cons`.
-/
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Multiset α` is the quotient of `List α` by list permutation. The result
is a type of finite sets with duplicates allowed. -/
def Multiset.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quotient (List.isSetoid α)
#align multiset Multiset
namespace Multiset
-- Porting note: new
/-- The quotient map from `List α` to `Multiset α`. -/
@[coe]
def ofList : List α → Multiset α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Multiset α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk (· ≈ ·) l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk Setoid.r l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe''
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
Quotient.eq
#align multiset.coe_eq_coe Multiset.coe_eq_coe
-- Porting note: new instance;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: move to better place
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ ≈ l₂) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (l₁ ~ l₂))
-- Porting note: `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂` was in parens which broke elaboration
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Multiset α)
| s₁, s₂ => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq
#align multiset.has_decidable_eq Multiset.decidableEq
/-- defines a size for a multiset by referring to the size of the underlying list -/
protected
def sizeOf [SizeOf α] (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
(Quot.liftOn s SizeOf.sizeOf) fun _ _ => Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
#align multiset.sizeof Multiset.sizeOf
instance [SizeOf α] : SizeOf (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sizeOf⟩
/-! ### Empty multiset -/
/-- `0 : Multiset α` is the empty set -/
protected def zero : Multiset α :=
@nil α
#align multiset.zero Multiset.zero
instance : Zero (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.zero⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedMultiset : Inhabited (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align multiset.inhabited_multiset Multiset.inhabitedMultiset
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Multiset α) where
default := 0
uniq := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, l⟩⟩; exacts [rfl, isEmptyElim a]
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : (@nil α : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_nil Multiset.coe_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.empty_eq_zero Multiset.empty_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_zero (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
Iff.trans coe_eq_coe perm_nil
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero Multiset.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l.isEmpty :=
Iff.trans (coe_eq_zero l) isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.symm
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_empty Multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
/-! ### `Multiset.cons` -/
/-- `cons a s` is the multiset which contains `s` plus one more instance of `a`. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (a :: l : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.cons a)
#align multiset.cons Multiset.cons
@[inherit_doc Multiset.cons]
infixr:67 " ::ₘ " => Multiset.cons
instance : Insert α (Multiset α) :=
⟨cons⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : insert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.insert_eq_cons Multiset.insert_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : List α) : (a ::ₘ l : Multiset α) = (a :: l : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_coe Multiset.cons_coe
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun l e =>
have : [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l := Quotient.exact e
singleton_perm_singleton.1 <| (perm_append_right_iff _).1 this,
congr_arg (· ::ₘ _)⟩
#align multiset.cons_inj_left Multiset.cons_inj_left
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) : ∀ {s t : Multiset α}, a ::ₘ s = a ::ₘ t ↔ s = t := by
rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩; simp
#align multiset.cons_inj_right Multiset.cons_inj_right
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {p : Multiset α → Prop} (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : ∀ s, p s := by
rintro ⟨l⟩; induction' l with _ _ ih <;> [exact empty; exact cons _ _ ih]
#align multiset.induction Multiset.induction
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (empty : p 0)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Multiset α), p s → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.induction empty cons s
#align multiset.induction_on Multiset.induction_on
theorem cons_swap (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ b ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Perm.swap _ _ _
#align multiset.cons_swap Multiset.cons_swap
section Rec
variable {C : Multiset α → Sort*}
/-- Dependent recursor on multisets.
TODO: should be @[recursor 6], but then the definition of `Multiset.pi` fails with a stack
overflow in `whnf`.
-/
protected
def rec (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b)))
(m : Multiset α) : C m :=
Quotient.hrecOn m (@List.rec α (fun l => C ⟦l⟧) C_0 fun a l b => C_cons a ⟦l⟧ b) fun l l' h =>
h.rec_heq
(fun hl _ ↦ by congr 1; exact Quot.sound hl)
(C_cons_heq _ _ ⟦_⟧ _)
#align multiset.rec Multiset.rec
/-- Companion to `Multiset.rec` with more convenient argument order. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected
def recOn (m : Multiset α) (C_0 : C 0) (C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m))
(C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))) :
C m :=
Multiset.rec C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq m
#align multiset.rec_on Multiset.recOn
variable {C_0 : C 0} {C_cons : ∀ a m, C m → C (a ::ₘ m)}
{C_cons_heq :
∀ a a' m b, HEq (C_cons a (a' ::ₘ m) (C_cons a' m b)) (C_cons a' (a ::ₘ m) (C_cons a m b))}
@[simp]
theorem recOn_0 : @Multiset.recOn α C (0 : Multiset α) C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_0 Multiset.recOn_0
@[simp]
theorem recOn_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq = C_cons a m (m.recOn C_0 C_cons C_cons_heq) :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
#align multiset.rec_on_cons Multiset.recOn_cons
end Rec
section Mem
/-- `a ∈ s` means that `a` has nonzero multiplicity in `s`. -/
def Mem (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun l₁ l₂ (e : l₁ ~ l₂) => propext <| e.mem_iff
#align multiset.mem Multiset.Mem
instance : Membership α (Multiset α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (l : Multiset α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.mem_coe Multiset.mem_coe
instance decidableMem [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l ↦ inferInstanceAs (Decidable (a ∈ l))
#align multiset.decidable_mem Multiset.decidableMem
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => List.mem_cons
#align multiset.mem_cons Multiset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ b ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_cons_of_mem Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ∈ a ::ₘ s :=
mem_cons.2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align multiset.mem_cons_self Multiset.mem_cons_self
theorem forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ a ::ₘ s, p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _ => List.forall_mem_cons
#align multiset.forall_mem_cons Multiset.forall_mem_cons
theorem exists_cons_of_mem {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → ∃ t, s = a ::ₘ t :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l (h : a ∈ l) =>
let ⟨l₁, l₂, e⟩ := append_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ ⟨(l₁ ++ l₂ : List α), Quot.sound perm_middle⟩
#align multiset.exists_cons_of_mem Multiset.exists_cons_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_zero (a : α) : a ∉ (0 : Multiset α) :=
List.not_mem_nil _
#align multiset.not_mem_zero Multiset.not_mem_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : (∀ x, x ∉ s) → s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => by rw [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.mpr H]; rfl
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Multiset α} : s = 0 ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ fun _ => not_mem_zero _, eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem⟩
#align multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem Multiset.eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem exists_mem_of_ne_zero {s : Multiset α} : s ≠ 0 → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l hl =>
match l, hl with
| [], h => False.elim <| h rfl
| a :: l, _ => ⟨a, by simp⟩
#align multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
theorem empty_or_exists_mem (s : Multiset α) : s = 0 ∨ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr Multiset.exists_mem_of_ne_zero
#align multiset.empty_or_exists_mem Multiset.empty_or_exists_mem
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_cons {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : 0 ≠ a ::ₘ m := fun h =>
have : a ∈ (0 : Multiset α) := h.symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
not_mem_zero _ this
#align multiset.zero_ne_cons Multiset.zero_ne_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_ne_zero {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ m ≠ 0 :=
zero_ne_cons.symm
#align multiset.cons_ne_zero Multiset.cons_ne_zero
theorem cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {as bs : Multiset α} :
a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ bs ↔ a = b ∧ as = bs ∨ a ≠ b ∧ ∃ cs, as = b ::ₘ cs ∧ bs = a ::ₘ cs := by
haveI : DecidableEq α := Classical.decEq α
constructor
· intro eq
by_cases h : a = b
· subst h
simp_all
· have : a ∈ b ::ₘ bs := eq ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
have : a ∈ bs := by simpa [h]
rcases exists_cons_of_mem this with ⟨cs, hcs⟩
simp only [h, hcs, false_and, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true, cons_inj_right, exists_eq_right',
true_and, false_or]
have : a ::ₘ as = b ::ₘ a ::ₘ cs := by simp [eq, hcs]
have : a ::ₘ as = a ::ₘ b ::ₘ cs := by rwa [cons_swap]
simpa using this
· intro h
rcases h with (⟨eq₁, eq₂⟩ | ⟨_, cs, eq₁, eq₂⟩)
· simp [*]
· simp [*, cons_swap a b]
#align multiset.cons_eq_cons Multiset.cons_eq_cons
end Mem
/-! ### Singleton -/
instance : Singleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun a => a ::ₘ 0⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero (a : α) : a ::ₘ 0 = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_zero Multiset.cons_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : ([a] : Multiset α) = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_singleton Multiset.coe_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) ↔ b = a := by
simp only [← cons_zero, mem_cons, iff_self_iff, or_false_iff, not_mem_zero]
#align multiset.mem_singleton Multiset.mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Multiset α) := by
rw [← cons_zero]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.mem_singleton_self Multiset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : ({a} : Multiset α) = {b} ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [← cons_zero]
exact cons_inj_left _
#align multiset.singleton_inj Multiset.singleton_inj
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : (l : Multiset α) = {a} ↔ l = [a] := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_eq_coe, List.perm_singleton]
#align multiset.coe_eq_singleton Multiset.coe_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_cons_iff {a b : α} (m : Multiset α) : {a} = b ::ₘ m ↔ a = b ∧ m = 0 := by
rw [← cons_zero, cons_eq_cons]
simp [eq_comm]
#align multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff Multiset.singleton_eq_cons_iff
theorem pair_comm (x y : α) : ({x, y} : Multiset α) = {y, x} :=
cons_swap x y 0
#align multiset.pair_comm Multiset.pair_comm
/-! ### `Multiset.Subset` -/
section Subset
variable {s : Multiset α} {a : α}
/-- `s ⊆ t` is the lift of the list subset relation. It means that any
element with nonzero multiplicity in `s` has nonzero multiplicity in `t`,
but it does not imply that the multiplicity of `a` in `s` is less or equal than in `t`;
see `s ≤ t` for this relation. -/
protected def Subset (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a : α⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t
#align multiset.subset Multiset.Subset
instance : HasSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.Subset⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance instIsNonstrictStrictOrder : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Multiset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) where
right_iff_left_not_left _ _ := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ⊆ l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_subset Multiset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Multiset α) : s ⊆ s := fun _ h => h
#align multiset.subset.refl Multiset.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.trans {s t u : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → t ⊆ u → s ⊆ u := fun h₁ h₂ _ m => h₂ (h₁ m)
#align multiset.subset.trans Multiset.Subset.trans
theorem subset_iff {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.subset_iff Multiset.subset_iff
theorem mem_of_subset {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
@h _
#align multiset.mem_of_subset Multiset.mem_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem zero_subset (s : Multiset α) : 0 ⊆ s := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
#align multiset.zero_subset Multiset.zero_subset
theorem subset_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ⊆ a ::ₘ s := fun _ => mem_cons_of_mem
#align multiset.subset_cons Multiset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons {s : Multiset α} {a : α} (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ a ::ₘ s :=
⟨subset_cons _ _, fun h => ha <| h <| mem_cons_self _ _⟩
#align multiset.ssubset_cons Multiset.ssubset_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ::ₘ s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp [subset_iff, or_imp, forall_and]
#align multiset.cons_subset Multiset.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_cons {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : s ⊆ t → a ::ₘ s ⊆ a ::ₘ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => List.cons_subset_cons _
#align multiset.cons_subset_cons Multiset.cons_subset_cons
theorem eq_zero_of_subset_zero {s : Multiset α} (h : s ⊆ 0) : s = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem fun _ hx ↦ not_mem_zero _ (h hx)
#align multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero Multiset.eq_zero_of_subset_zero
@[simp] lemma subset_zero : s ⊆ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_of_subset_zero, fun xeq => xeq.symm ▸ Subset.refl 0⟩
#align multiset.subset_zero Multiset.subset_zero
@[simp] lemma zero_ssubset : 0 ⊂ s ↔ s ≠ 0 := by simp [ssubset_iff_subset_not_subset]
@[simp] lemma singleton_subset : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [subset_iff]
theorem induction_on' {p : Multiset α → Prop} (S : Multiset α) (h₁ : p 0)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Multiset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ hps hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := cons_subset.1 hs
h₂ hS sS (hps sS))
(Subset.refl S)
#align multiset.induction_on' Multiset.induction_on'
end Subset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out'
#align multiset.to_list Multiset.toList
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
#align multiset.coe_to_list Multiset.coe_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_nil Multiset.toList_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 :=
isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.trans toList_eq_nil
#align multiset.empty_to_list Multiset.empty_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
#align multiset.to_list_zero Multiset.toList_zero
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
#align multiset.mem_to_list Multiset.mem_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
#align multiset.to_list_eq_singleton_iff Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
#align multiset.to_list_singleton Multiset.toList_singleton
end ToList
/-! ### Partial order on `Multiset`s -/
/-- `s ≤ t` means that `s` is a sublist of `t` (up to permutation).
Equivalently, `s ≤ t` means that `count a s ≤ count a t` for all `a`. -/
protected def Le (s t : Multiset α) : Prop :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s t (· <+~ ·)) fun _ _ _ _ p₁ p₂ =>
propext (p₂.subperm_left.trans p₁.subperm_right)
#align multiset.le Multiset.Le
instance : PartialOrder (Multiset α) where
le := Multiset.Le
le_refl := by rintro ⟨l⟩; exact Subperm.refl _
le_trans := by rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ ⟨l₃⟩; exact @Subperm.trans _ _ _ _
le_antisymm := by rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩ h₁ h₂; exact Quot.sound (Subperm.antisymm h₁ h₂)
instance decidableLE [DecidableEq α] : DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : Multiset α → Multiset α → Prop) :=
fun s t => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s t List.decidableSubperm
#align multiset.decidable_le Multiset.decidableLE
section
variable {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
theorem subset_of_le : s ≤ t → s ⊆ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => Subperm.subset
#align multiset.subset_of_le Multiset.subset_of_le
alias Le.subset := subset_of_le
#align multiset.le.subset Multiset.Le.subset
theorem mem_of_le (h : s ≤ t) : a ∈ s → a ∈ t :=
mem_of_subset (subset_of_le h)
#align multiset.mem_of_le Multiset.mem_of_le
theorem not_mem_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align multiset.not_mem_mono Multiset.not_mem_mono
@[simp]
theorem coe_le {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) ≤ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+~ l₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_le Multiset.coe_le
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem leInductionOn {C : Multiset α → Multiset α → Prop} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t)
(H : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → C l₁ l₂) : C s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t (fun l₁ _ ⟨l, p, s⟩ => (show ⟦l⟧ = ⟦l₁⟧ from Quot.sound p) ▸ H s) h
#align multiset.le_induction_on Multiset.leInductionOn
theorem zero_le (s : Multiset α) : 0 ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => (nil_sublist l).subperm
#align multiset.zero_le Multiset.zero_le
instance : OrderBot (Multiset α) where
bot := 0
bot_le := zero_le
/-- This is a `rfl` and `simp` version of `bot_eq_zero`. -/
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.bot_eq_zero Multiset.bot_eq_zero
theorem le_zero : s ≤ 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
#align multiset.le_zero Multiset.le_zero
theorem lt_cons_self (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s < a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l =>
suffices l <+~ a :: l ∧ ¬l ~ a :: l by simpa [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
⟨(sublist_cons _ _).subperm, fun p => _root_.ne_of_lt (lt_succ_self (length l)) p.length_eq⟩
#align multiset.lt_cons_self Multiset.lt_cons_self
theorem le_cons_self (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a ::ₘ s :=
le_of_lt <| lt_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.le_cons_self Multiset.le_cons_self
theorem cons_le_cons_iff (a : α) : a ::ₘ s ≤ a ::ₘ t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => subperm_cons a
#align multiset.cons_le_cons_iff Multiset.cons_le_cons_iff
theorem cons_le_cons (a : α) : s ≤ t → a ::ₘ s ≤ a ::ₘ t :=
(cons_le_cons_iff a).2
#align multiset.cons_le_cons Multiset.cons_le_cons
@[simp] lemma cons_lt_cons_iff : a ::ₘ s < a ::ₘ t ↔ s < t :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le' (cons_le_cons_iff _) (cons_le_cons_iff _)
lemma cons_lt_cons (a : α) (h : s < t) : a ::ₘ s < a ::ₘ t := cons_lt_cons_iff.2 h
theorem le_cons_of_not_mem (m : a ∉ s) : s ≤ a ::ₘ t ↔ s ≤ t := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => le_trans h <| le_cons_self _ _⟩
suffices ∀ {t'}, s ≤ t' → a ∈ t' → a ::ₘ s ≤ t' by
exact fun h => (cons_le_cons_iff a).1 (this h (mem_cons_self _ _))
introv h
revert m
refine leInductionOn h ?_
introv s m₁ m₂
rcases append_of_mem m₂ with ⟨r₁, r₂, rfl⟩
exact
perm_middle.subperm_left.2
((subperm_cons _).2 <| ((sublist_or_mem_of_sublist s).resolve_right m₁).subperm)
#align multiset.le_cons_of_not_mem Multiset.le_cons_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_zero (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α) ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (lt_cons_self _ _)
#align multiset.singleton_ne_zero Multiset.singleton_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem singleton_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : {a} ≤ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => mem_of_le h (mem_singleton_self _), fun h =>
let ⟨_t, e⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h
e.symm ▸ cons_le_cons _ (zero_le _)⟩
#align multiset.singleton_le Multiset.singleton_le
@[simp] lemma le_singleton : s ≤ {a} ↔ s = 0 ∨ s = {a} :=
Quot.induction_on s fun l ↦ by simp only [cons_zero, ← coe_singleton, quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_le,
coe_eq_zero, coe_eq_coe, perm_singleton, subperm_singleton_iff]
@[simp] lemma lt_singleton : s < {a} ↔ s = 0 := by
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_singleton, or_and_right, Ne, and_not_self, or_false,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl
exact (singleton_ne_zero _).symm
@[simp] lemma ssubset_singleton_iff : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs ↦ eq_zero_of_subset_zero fun b hb ↦ (hs.2 ?_).elim, ?_⟩
· obtain rfl := mem_singleton.1 (hs.1 hb)
rwa [singleton_subset]
· rintro rfl
simp
end
/-! ### Additive monoid -/
/-- The sum of two multisets is the lift of the list append operation.
This adds the multiplicities of each element,
i.e. `count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t`. -/
protected def add (s₁ s₂ : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s₁ s₂ fun l₁ l₂ => ((l₁ ++ l₂ : List α) : Multiset α)) fun _ _ _ _ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.append p₂
#align multiset.add Multiset.add
instance : Add (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.add⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (s t : List α) : (s + t : Multiset α) = (s ++ t : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_add Multiset.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem singleton_add (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : {a} + s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.singleton_add Multiset.singleton_add
private theorem add_le_add_iff_left' {s t u : Multiset α} : s + t ≤ s + u ↔ t ≤ u :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ s t u fun _ _ _ => subperm_append_left _
instance : CovariantClass (Multiset α) (Multiset α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _s _t _u => add_le_add_iff_left'.2⟩
instance : ContravariantClass (Multiset α) (Multiset α) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _s _t _u => add_le_add_iff_left'.1⟩
instance : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid (Multiset α) where
zero := 0
add := (· + ·)
add_comm := fun s t => Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => Quot.sound perm_append_comm
add_assoc := fun s₁ s₂ s₃ =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ s₁ s₂ s₃ fun l₁ l₂ l₃ => congr_arg _ <| append_assoc l₁ l₂ l₃
zero_add := fun s => Quot.inductionOn s fun l => rfl
add_zero := fun s => Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| append_nil l
add_le_add_left := fun s₁ s₂ => add_le_add_left
le_of_add_le_add_left := fun s₁ s₂ s₃ => le_of_add_le_add_left
nsmul := nsmulRec
theorem le_add_right (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ s + t := by simpa using add_le_add_left (zero_le t) s
#align multiset.le_add_right Multiset.le_add_right
theorem le_add_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ t + s := by simpa using add_le_add_right (zero_le t) s
#align multiset.le_add_left Multiset.le_add_left
theorem le_iff_exists_add {s t : Multiset α} : s ≤ t ↔ ∃ u, t = s + u :=
⟨fun h =>
leInductionOn h fun s =>
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append
⟨l, Quot.sound p⟩,
fun ⟨_u, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ le_add_right _ _⟩
#align multiset.le_iff_exists_add Multiset.le_iff_exists_add
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid (Multiset α) where
__ := inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset α))
le_self_add := le_add_right
exists_add_of_le h := leInductionOn h fun s =>
let ⟨l, p⟩ := s.exists_perm_append
⟨l, Quot.sound p⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_add (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s + t = a ::ₘ (s + t) := by
rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_assoc]
#align multiset.cons_add Multiset.cons_add
@[simp]
theorem add_cons (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : s + a ::ₘ t = a ::ₘ (s + t) := by
rw [add_comm, cons_add, add_comm]
#align multiset.add_cons Multiset.add_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_add {a : α} {s t : Multiset α} : a ∈ s + t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => mem_append
#align multiset.mem_add Multiset.mem_add
theorem mem_of_mem_nsmul {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} (h : a ∈ n • s) : a ∈ s := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [zero_nsmul] at h
exact absurd h (not_mem_zero _)
· rw [succ_nsmul, mem_add] at h
exact h.elim ih id
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_nsmul Multiset.mem_of_mem_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem mem_nsmul {a : α} {s : Multiset α} {n : ℕ} (h0 : n ≠ 0) : a ∈ n • s ↔ a ∈ s := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_nsmul, fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h0
rw [succ_nsmul, mem_add]
exact Or.inr h
#align multiset.mem_nsmul Multiset.mem_nsmul
theorem nsmul_cons {s : Multiset α} (n : ℕ) (a : α) :
n • (a ::ₘ s) = n • ({a} : Multiset α) + n • s := by
rw [← singleton_add, nsmul_add]
#align multiset.nsmul_cons Multiset.nsmul_cons
/-! ### Cardinality -/
/-- The cardinality of a multiset is the sum of the multiplicities
of all its elements, or simply the length of the underlying list. -/
def card : Multiset α →+ ℕ where
toFun s := (Quot.liftOn s length) fun _l₁ _l₂ => Perm.length_eq
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' s t := Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t length_append
#align multiset.card Multiset.card
@[simp]
theorem coe_card (l : List α) : card (l : Multiset α) = length l :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_card Multiset.coe_card
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
#align multiset.length_to_list Multiset.length_toList
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): `dsimp` can not prove this, yet linter complains
theorem card_zero : @card α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.card_zero Multiset.card_zero
theorem card_add (s t : Multiset α) : card (s + t) = card s + card t :=
card.map_add s t
#align multiset.card_add Multiset.card_add
theorem card_nsmul (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) : card (n • s) = n * card s := by
rw [card.map_nsmul s n, Nat.nsmul_eq_mul]
#align multiset.card_nsmul Multiset.card_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem card_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : card (a ::ₘ s) = card s + 1 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.card_cons Multiset.card_cons
@[simp]
theorem card_singleton (a : α) : card ({a} : Multiset α) = 1 := by
simp only [← cons_zero, card_zero, eq_self_iff_true, zero_add, card_cons]
#align multiset.card_singleton Multiset.card_singleton
theorem card_pair (a b : α) : card {a, b} = 2 := by
rw [insert_eq_cons, card_cons, card_singleton]
#align multiset.card_pair Multiset.card_pair
theorem card_eq_one {s : Multiset α} : card s = 1 ↔ ∃ a, s = {a} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => (List.length_eq_one.1 h).imp fun _a => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_one Multiset.card_eq_one
theorem card_le_card {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card s ≤ card t :=
leInductionOn h Sublist.length_le
#align multiset.card_le_of_le Multiset.card_le_card
@[mono]
theorem card_mono : Monotone (@card α) := fun _a _b => card_le_card
#align multiset.card_mono Multiset.card_mono
theorem eq_of_le_of_card_le {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : card t ≤ card s → s = t :=
leInductionOn h fun s h₂ => congr_arg _ <| s.eq_of_length_le h₂
#align multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le Multiset.eq_of_le_of_card_le
theorem card_lt_card {s t : Multiset α} (h : s < t) : card s < card t :=
lt_of_not_ge fun h₂ => _root_.ne_of_lt h <| eq_of_le_of_card_le (le_of_lt h) h₂
#align multiset.card_lt_card Multiset.card_lt_card
lemma card_strictMono : StrictMono (card : Multiset α → ℕ) := fun _ _ ↦ card_lt_card
theorem lt_iff_cons_le {s t : Multiset α} : s < t ↔ ∃ a, a ::ₘ s ≤ t :=
⟨Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h =>
Subperm.exists_of_length_lt (le_of_lt h) (card_lt_card h),
fun ⟨_a, h⟩ => lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_cons_self _ _) h⟩
#align multiset.lt_iff_cons_le Multiset.lt_iff_cons_le
@[simp]
theorem card_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} : card s = 0 ↔ s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => (eq_of_le_of_card_le (zero_le _) (le_of_eq h)).symm, fun e => by simp [e]⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_zero Multiset.card_eq_zero
theorem card_pos {s : Multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ s ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr card_eq_zero
#align multiset.card_pos Multiset.card_pos
theorem card_pos_iff_exists_mem {s : Multiset α} : 0 < card s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_pos_iff_exists_mem
#align multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem Multiset.card_pos_iff_exists_mem
theorem card_eq_two {s : Multiset α} : card s = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, s = {x, y} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h =>
(List.length_eq_two.mp h).imp fun _a => Exists.imp fun _b => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, _b, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_two Multiset.card_eq_two
theorem card_eq_three {s : Multiset α} : card s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, s = {x, y, z} :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h =>
(List.length_eq_three.mp h).imp fun _a =>
Exists.imp fun _b => Exists.imp fun _c => congr_arg _,
fun ⟨_a, _b, _c, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align multiset.card_eq_three Multiset.card_eq_three
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
#align multiset.strong_induction_on Multiset.strongInductionOnₓ -- Porting note: reorderd universes
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
#align multiset.strong_induction_eq Multiset.strongInductionOn_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
#align multiset.case_strong_induction_on Multiset.case_strongInductionOn
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
-- Porting note: reorderd universes
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction Multiset.strongDownwardInductionₓ
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_eq Multiset.strongDownwardInduction_eq
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_on Multiset.strongDownwardInductionOn
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
#align multiset.strong_downward_induction_on_eq Multiset.strongDownwardInductionOn_eq
#align multiset.well_founded_lt wellFounded_lt
/-- Another way of expressing `strongInductionOn`: the `(<)` relation is well-founded. -/
instance instWellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Multiset α) :=
⟨Subrelation.wf Multiset.card_lt_card (measure Multiset.card).2⟩
#align multiset.is_well_founded_lt Multiset.instWellFoundedLT
/-! ### `Multiset.replicate` -/
/-- `replicate n a` is the multiset containing only `a` with multiplicity `n`. -/
def replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : Multiset α :=
List.replicate n a
#align multiset.replicate Multiset.replicate
theorem coe_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) : (List.replicate n a : Multiset α) = replicate n a := rfl
#align multiset.coe_replicate Multiset.coe_replicate
@[simp] theorem replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = 0 := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_zero Multiset.replicate_zero
@[simp] theorem replicate_succ (a : α) (n) : replicate (n + 1) a = a ::ₘ replicate n a := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_succ Multiset.replicate_succ
theorem replicate_add (m n : ℕ) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a + replicate n a :=
congr_arg _ <| List.replicate_add ..
#align multiset.replicate_add Multiset.replicate_add
/-- `Multiset.replicate` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def replicateAddMonoidHom (a : α) : ℕ →+ Multiset α where
toFun := fun n => replicate n a
map_zero' := replicate_zero a
map_add' := fun _ _ => replicate_add _ _ a
#align multiset.replicate_add_monoid_hom Multiset.replicateAddMonoidHom
#align multiset.replicate_add_monoid_hom_apply Multiset.replicateAddMonoidHom_apply
theorem replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = {a} := rfl
#align multiset.replicate_one Multiset.replicate_one
@[simp] theorem card_replicate (n) (a : α) : card (replicate n a) = n :=
length_replicate n a
#align multiset.card_replicate Multiset.card_replicate
theorem mem_replicate {a b : α} {n : ℕ} : b ∈ replicate n a ↔ n ≠ 0 ∧ b = a :=
List.mem_replicate
#align multiset.mem_replicate Multiset.mem_replicate
theorem eq_of_mem_replicate {a b : α} {n} : b ∈ replicate n a → b = a :=
List.eq_of_mem_replicate
#align multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate Multiset.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_card {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : s = replicate (card s) a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => coe_eq_coe.trans <| perm_replicate.trans eq_replicate_length
#align multiset.eq_replicate_card Multiset.eq_replicate_card
alias ⟨_, eq_replicate_of_mem⟩ := eq_replicate_card
#align multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem Multiset.eq_replicate_of_mem
theorem eq_replicate {a : α} {n} {s : Multiset α} :
s = replicate n a ↔ card s = n ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨card_replicate _ _, fun _b => eq_of_mem_replicate⟩,
fun ⟨e, al⟩ => e ▸ eq_replicate_of_mem al⟩
#align multiset.eq_replicate Multiset.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align multiset.replicate_right_injective Multiset.replicate_right_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective h).eq_iff
#align multiset.replicate_right_inj Multiset.replicate_right_inj
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
-- Porting note: was `fun m n h => by rw [← (eq_replicate.1 h).1, card_replicate]`
LeftInverse.injective (card_replicate · a)
#align multiset.replicate_left_injective Multiset.replicate_left_injective
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n : ℕ) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ {a} :=
List.replicate_subset_singleton n a
#align multiset.replicate_subset_singleton Multiset.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem replicate_le_coe {a : α} {n} {l : List α} : replicate n a ≤ l ↔ List.replicate n a <+ l :=
⟨fun ⟨_l', p, s⟩ => perm_replicate.1 p ▸ s, Sublist.subperm⟩
#align multiset.replicate_le_coe Multiset.replicate_le_coe
theorem nsmul_replicate {a : α} (n m : ℕ) : n • replicate m a = replicate (n * m) a :=
((replicateAddMonoidHom a).map_nsmul _ _).symm
#align multiset.nsmul_replicate Multiset.nsmul_replicate
theorem nsmul_singleton (a : α) (n) : n • ({a} : Multiset α) = replicate n a := by
rw [← replicate_one, nsmul_replicate, mul_one]
#align multiset.nsmul_singleton Multiset.nsmul_singleton
theorem replicate_le_replicate (a : α) {k n : ℕ} : replicate k a ≤ replicate n a ↔ k ≤ n :=
_root_.trans (by rw [← replicate_le_coe, coe_replicate]) (List.replicate_sublist_replicate a)
#align multiset.replicate_le_replicate Multiset.replicate_le_replicate
theorem le_replicate_iff {m : Multiset α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
m ≤ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, m = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨card m, (card_mono h).trans_eq (card_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_card.2 fun _ hb => eq_of_mem_replicate <| subset_of_le h hb⟩,
fun ⟨_, hkn, hm⟩ => hm.symm ▸ (replicate_le_replicate _).2 hkn⟩
#align multiset.le_replicate_iff Multiset.le_replicate_iff
theorem lt_replicate_succ {m : Multiset α} {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
m < replicate (n + 1) x ↔ m ≤ replicate n x := by
rw [lt_iff_cons_le]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x', hx'⟩
have := eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_of_le hx' (mem_cons_self _ _))
rwa [this, replicate_succ, cons_le_cons_iff] at hx'
· intro h
rw [replicate_succ]
exact ⟨x, cons_le_cons _ h⟩
#align multiset.lt_replicate_succ Multiset.lt_replicate_succ
/-! ### Erasing one copy of an element -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the multiset that subtracts 1 from the multiplicity of `a`. -/
def erase (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (l.erase a : Multiset α)) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => Quot.sound (p.erase a)
#align multiset.erase Multiset.erase
@[simp]
theorem coe_erase (l : List α) (a : α) : erase (l : Multiset α) a = l.erase a :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_erase Multiset.coe_erase
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): `dsimp` can not prove this, yet linter complains
theorem erase_zero (a : α) : (0 : Multiset α).erase a = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.erase_zero Multiset.erase_zero
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_head (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : (a ::ₘ s).erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_cons_head a l
#align multiset.erase_cons_head Multiset.erase_cons_head
@[simp]
theorem erase_cons_tail {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) (h : b ≠ a) :
(b ::ₘ s).erase a = b ::ₘ s.erase a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_cons_tail l (not_beq_of_ne h)
#align multiset.erase_cons_tail Multiset.erase_cons_tail
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).erase a = 0 :=
erase_cons_head a 0
#align multiset.erase_singleton Multiset.erase_singleton
@[simp]
theorem erase_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∉ s → s.erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => congr_arg _ <| List.erase_of_not_mem h
#align multiset.erase_of_not_mem Multiset.erase_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem cons_erase {s : Multiset α} {a : α} : a ∈ s → a ::ₘ s.erase a = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => Quot.sound (perm_cons_erase h).symm
#align multiset.cons_erase Multiset.cons_erase
theorem erase_cons_tail_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(b ::ₘ s).erase a = b ::ₘ s.erase a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | hab
· simp [cons_erase h]
· exact s.erase_cons_tail hab.symm
theorem le_cons_erase (s : Multiset α) (a : α) : s ≤ a ::ₘ s.erase a :=
if h : a ∈ s then le_of_eq (cons_erase h).symm
else by rw [erase_of_not_mem h]; apply le_cons_self
#align multiset.le_cons_erase Multiset.le_cons_erase
theorem add_singleton_eq_iff {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} : s + {a} = t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s = t.erase a := by
rw [add_comm, singleton_add]; constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨s.mem_cons_self a, (s.erase_cons_head a).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨h, rfl⟩
exact cons_erase h
#align multiset.add_singleton_eq_iff Multiset.add_singleton_eq_iff
theorem erase_add_left_pos {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (t) : a ∈ s → (s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ l₂ h => congr_arg _ <| erase_append_left l₂ h
#align multiset.erase_add_left_pos Multiset.erase_add_left_pos
theorem erase_add_right_pos {a : α} (s) {t : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a := by rw [add_comm, erase_add_left_pos s h, add_comm]
#align multiset.erase_add_right_pos Multiset.erase_add_right_pos
theorem erase_add_right_neg {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (t) :
a ∉ s → (s + t).erase a = s + t.erase a :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ l₂ h => congr_arg _ <| erase_append_right l₂ h
#align multiset.erase_add_right_neg Multiset.erase_add_right_neg
theorem erase_add_left_neg {a : α} (s) {t : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ t) :
(s + t).erase a = s.erase a + t := by rw [add_comm, erase_add_right_neg s h, add_comm]
#align multiset.erase_add_left_neg Multiset.erase_add_left_neg
theorem erase_le (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s.erase a ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => (erase_sublist a l).subperm
#align multiset.erase_le Multiset.erase_le
@[simp]
theorem erase_lt {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : s.erase a < s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => not_imp_comm.1 erase_of_not_mem (ne_of_lt h), fun h => by
simpa [h] using lt_cons_self (s.erase a) a⟩
#align multiset.erase_lt Multiset.erase_lt
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s.erase a ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le (erase_le a s)
#align multiset.erase_subset Multiset.erase_subset
theorem mem_erase_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (ab : a ≠ b) : a ∈ s.erase b ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_erase_of_ne ab
#align multiset.mem_erase_of_ne Multiset.mem_erase_of_ne
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.erase b → a ∈ s :=
mem_of_subset (erase_subset _ _)
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_erase Multiset.mem_of_mem_erase
theorem erase_comm (s : Multiset α) (a b : α) : (s.erase a).erase b = (s.erase b).erase a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| l.erase_comm a b
#align multiset.erase_comm Multiset.erase_comm
theorem erase_le_erase {s t : Multiset α} (a : α) (h : s ≤ t) : s.erase a ≤ t.erase a :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.erase _).subperm
#align multiset.erase_le_erase Multiset.erase_le_erase
theorem erase_le_iff_le_cons {s t : Multiset α} {a : α} : s.erase a ≤ t ↔ s ≤ a ::ₘ t :=
⟨fun h => le_trans (le_cons_erase _ _) (cons_le_cons _ h), fun h =>
if m : a ∈ s then by rw [← cons_erase m] at h; exact (cons_le_cons_iff _).1 h
else le_trans (erase_le _ _) ((le_cons_of_not_mem m).1 h)⟩
#align multiset.erase_le_iff_le_cons Multiset.erase_le_iff_le_cons
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) = pred (card s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_erase_of_mem
#align multiset.card_erase_of_mem Multiset.card_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem card_erase_add_one {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) + 1 = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_erase_add_one
#align multiset.card_erase_add_one Multiset.card_erase_add_one
theorem card_erase_lt_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → card (s.erase a) < card s :=
fun h => card_lt_card (erase_lt.mpr h)
#align multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem Multiset.card_erase_lt_of_mem
theorem card_erase_le {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : card (s.erase a) ≤ card s :=
card_le_card (erase_le a s)
#align multiset.card_erase_le Multiset.card_erase_le
theorem card_erase_eq_ite {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
card (s.erase a) = if a ∈ s then pred (card s) else card s := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rwa [card_erase_of_mem h, if_pos]
· rwa [erase_of_not_mem h, if_neg]
#align multiset.card_erase_eq_ite Multiset.card_erase_eq_ite
end Erase
@[simp]
theorem coe_reverse (l : List α) : (reverse l : Multiset α) = l :=
Quot.sound <| reverse_perm _
#align multiset.coe_reverse Multiset.coe_reverse
/-! ### `Multiset.map` -/
/-- `map f s` is the lift of the list `map` operation. The multiplicity
of `b` in `map f s` is the number of `a ∈ s` (counting multiplicity)
such that `f a = b`. -/
def map (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l : List α => (l.map f : Multiset β)) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => Quot.sound (p.map f)
#align multiset.map Multiset.map
@[congr]
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} :
s = t → (∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) → map f s = map g t := by
rintro rfl h
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact congr_arg _ (List.map_congr h)
#align multiset.map_congr Multiset.map_congr
theorem map_hcongr {β' : Type v} {m : Multiset α} {f : α → β} {f' : α → β'} (h : β = β')
(hf : ∀ a ∈ m, HEq (f a) (f' a)) : HEq (map f m) (map f' m) := by
subst h; simp at hf
simp [map_congr rfl hf]
#align multiset.map_hcongr Multiset.map_hcongr
theorem forall_mem_map_iff {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ y ∈ s.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p (f x) :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun _L => List.forall_mem_map_iff
#align multiset.forall_mem_map_iff Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma map_coe (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = l.map f := rfl
#align multiset.coe_map Multiset.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : map f 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.map_zero Multiset.map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_cons (f : α → β) (a s) : map f (a ::ₘ s) = f a ::ₘ map f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.map_cons Multiset.map_cons
theorem map_comp_cons (f : α → β) (t) : map f ∘ cons t = cons (f t) ∘ map f := by
ext
simp
#align multiset.map_comp_cons Multiset.map_comp_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).map f = {f a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.map_singleton Multiset.map_singleton
@[simp]
theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (k : ℕ) (a : α) : (replicate k a).map f = replicate k (f a) := by
simp only [← coe_replicate, map_coe, List.map_replicate]
#align multiset.map_replicate Multiset.map_replicate
@[simp]
theorem map_add (f : α → β) (s t) : map f (s + t) = map f s + map f t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg _ <| map_append _ _ _
#align multiset.map_add Multiset.map_add
/-- If each element of `s : Multiset α` can be lifted to `β`, then `s` can be lifted to
`Multiset β`. -/
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Multiset α) (Multiset β) (map c) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf := by
rintro ⟨l⟩ hl
lift l to List β using hl
exact ⟨l, map_coe _ _⟩
#align multiset.can_lift Multiset.canLift
/-- `Multiset.map` as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def mapAddMonoidHom (f : α → β) : Multiset α →+ Multiset β where
toFun := map f
map_zero' := map_zero _
map_add' := map_add _
#align multiset.map_add_monoid_hom Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapAddMonoidHom (f : α → β) :
(mapAddMonoidHom f : Multiset α → Multiset β) = map f :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_map_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_mapAddMonoidHom
theorem map_nsmul (f : α → β) (n : ℕ) (s) : map f (n • s) = n • map f s :=
(mapAddMonoidHom f).map_nsmul _ _
#align multiset.map_nsmul Multiset.map_nsmul
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Multiset α} : b ∈ map f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_map
#align multiset.mem_map Multiset.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem card_map (f : α → β) (s) : card (map f s) = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => length_map _ _
#align multiset.card_map Multiset.card_map
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero {s : Multiset α} {f : α → β} : s.map f = 0 ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← Multiset.card_eq_zero, Multiset.card_map, Multiset.card_eq_zero]
#align multiset.map_eq_zero Multiset.map_eq_zero
theorem mem_map_of_mem (f : α → β) {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : f a ∈ map f s :=
mem_map.2 ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
#align multiset.mem_map_of_mem Multiset.mem_map_of_mem
theorem map_eq_singleton {f : α → β} {s : Multiset α} {b : β} :
map f s = {b} ↔ ∃ a : α, s = {a} ∧ f a = b := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, s = {a} := by rw [← card_eq_one, ← card_map, h, card_singleton]
refine ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_singleton, ← h, ha, map_singleton, mem_singleton]
· rintro ⟨a, rfl, rfl⟩
simp
#align multiset.map_eq_singleton Multiset.map_eq_singleton
theorem map_eq_cons [DecidableEq α] (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (t : Multiset β) (b : β) :
(∃ a ∈ s, f a = b ∧ (s.erase a).map f = t) ↔ s.map f = b ::ₘ t := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [← map_cons, Multiset.cons_erase ha]
· intro h
have : b ∈ s.map f := by
rw [h]
exact mem_cons_self _ _
obtain ⟨a, h1, rfl⟩ := mem_map.mp this
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := exists_cons_of_mem h1
rw [map_cons, cons_inj_right] at h
refine ⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, rfl, ?_⟩
rw [Multiset.erase_cons_head, h]
#align multiset.map_eq_cons Multiset.map_eq_cons
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Multiset.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {s : Multiset α} :
f a ∈ map f s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_map_of_injective H
#align multiset.mem_map_of_injective Multiset.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => congr_arg _ <| List.map_map _ _ _
#align multiset.map_map Multiset.map_map
theorem map_id (s : Multiset α) : map id s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => congr_arg _ <| List.map_id _
#align multiset.map_id Multiset.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_id' (s : Multiset α) : map (fun x => x) s = s :=
map_id s
#align multiset.map_id' Multiset.map_id'
-- Porting note: was a `simp` lemma in mathlib3
theorem map_const (s : Multiset α) (b : β) : map (const α b) s = replicate (card s) b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => congr_arg _ <| List.map_const' _ _
#align multiset.map_const Multiset.map_const
-- Porting note: was not a `simp` lemma in mathlib3 because `Function.const` was reducible
@[simp] theorem map_const' (s : Multiset α) (b : β) : map (fun _ ↦ b) s = replicate (card s) b :=
map_const _ _
#align multiset.map_const' Multiset.map_const'
theorem eq_of_mem_map_const {b₁ b₂ : β} {l : List α} (h : b₁ ∈ map (Function.const α b₂) l) :
b₁ = b₂ :=
eq_of_mem_replicate <| by rwa [map_const] at h
#align multiset.eq_of_mem_map_const Multiset.eq_of_mem_map_const
@[simp]
theorem map_le_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : map f s ≤ map f t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.map f).subperm
#align multiset.map_le_map Multiset.map_le_map
@[simp]
theorem map_lt_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (h : s < t) : s.map f < t.map f := by
refine (map_le_map h.le).lt_of_not_le fun H => h.ne <| eq_of_le_of_card_le h.le ?_
rw [← s.card_map f, ← t.card_map f]
exact card_le_card H
#align multiset.map_lt_map Multiset.map_lt_map
theorem map_mono (f : α → β) : Monotone (map f) := fun _ _ => map_le_map
#align multiset.map_mono Multiset.map_mono
theorem map_strictMono (f : α → β) : StrictMono (map f) := fun _ _ => map_lt_map
#align multiset.map_strict_mono Multiset.map_strictMono
@[simp]
theorem map_subset_map {f : α → β} {s t : Multiset α} (H : s ⊆ t) : map f s ⊆ map f t := fun _b m =>
let ⟨a, h, e⟩ := mem_map.1 m
mem_map.2 ⟨a, H h, e⟩
#align multiset.map_subset_map Multiset.map_subset_map
theorem map_erase [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) (x : α)
(s : Multiset α) : (s.erase x).map f = (s.map f).erase (f x) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with y s ih
· simp
by_cases hxy : y = x
· cases hxy
simp
· rw [s.erase_cons_tail hxy, map_cons, map_cons, (s.map f).erase_cons_tail (hf.ne hxy), ih]
#align multiset.map_erase Multiset.map_erase
theorem map_erase_of_mem [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β)
(s : Multiset α) {x : α} (h : x ∈ s) : (s.erase x).map f = (s.map f).erase (f x) := by
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with y s ih
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne y x with rfl | hxy
· simp
replace h : x ∈ s := by simpa [hxy.symm] using h
rw [s.erase_cons_tail hxy, map_cons, map_cons, ih h, erase_cons_tail_of_mem (mem_map_of_mem f h)]
theorem map_surjective_of_surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (map f) := by
intro s
induction' s using Multiset.induction_on with x s ih
· exact ⟨0, map_zero _⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := ih
exact ⟨y ::ₘ t, map_cons _ _ _⟩
#align multiset.map_surjective_of_surjective Multiset.map_surjective_of_surjective
/-! ### `Multiset.fold` -/
/-- `foldl f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldl f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is right-commutative,
that is, `f (f b a₁) a₂ = f (f b a₂) a₁`. -/
def foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) : β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => List.foldl f b l) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => p.foldl_eq H b
#align multiset.foldl Multiset.foldl
@[simp]
theorem foldl_zero (f : β → α → β) (H b) : foldl f H b 0 = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldl_zero Multiset.foldl_zero
@[simp]
theorem foldl_cons (f : β → α → β) (H b a s) : foldl f H b (a ::ₘ s) = foldl f H (f b a) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.foldl_cons Multiset.foldl_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldl_add (f : β → α → β) (H b s t) : foldl f H b (s + t) = foldl f H (foldl f H b s) t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => foldl_append _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldl_add Multiset.foldl_add
/-- `foldr f H b s` is the lift of the list operation `foldr f b l`,
which folds `f` over the multiset. It is well defined when `f` is left-commutative,
that is, `f a₁ (f a₂ b) = f a₂ (f a₁ b)`. -/
def foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) : β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => List.foldr f b l) fun _l₁ _l₂ p => p.foldr_eq H b
#align multiset.foldr Multiset.foldr
@[simp]
theorem foldr_zero (f : α → β → β) (H b) : foldr f H b 0 = b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldr_zero Multiset.foldr_zero
@[simp]
theorem foldr_cons (f : α → β → β) (H b a s) : foldr f H b (a ::ₘ s) = f a (foldr f H b s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.foldr_cons Multiset.foldr_cons
@[simp]
theorem foldr_singleton (f : α → β → β) (H b a) : foldr f H b ({a} : Multiset α) = f a b :=
rfl
#align multiset.foldr_singleton Multiset.foldr_singleton
@[simp]
theorem foldr_add (f : α → β → β) (H b s t) : foldr f H b (s + t) = foldr f H (foldr f H b t) s :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => foldr_append _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldr_add Multiset.foldr_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_foldr (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldr f b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_foldr Multiset.coe_foldr
@[simp]
theorem coe_foldl (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldl f H b l = l.foldl f b :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_foldl Multiset.coe_foldl
theorem coe_foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (l : List α) :
foldr f H b l = l.foldl (fun x y => f y x) b :=
(congr_arg (foldr f H b) (coe_reverse l)).symm.trans <| foldr_reverse _ _ _
#align multiset.coe_foldr_swap Multiset.coe_foldr_swap
theorem foldr_swap (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) :
foldr f H b s = foldl (fun x y => f y x) (fun _x _y _z => (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => coe_foldr_swap _ _ _ _
#align multiset.foldr_swap Multiset.foldr_swap
theorem foldl_swap (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (b : β) (s : Multiset α) :
foldl f H b s = foldr (fun x y => f y x) (fun _x _y _z => (H _ _ _).symm) b s :=
(foldr_swap _ _ _ _).symm
#align multiset.foldl_swap Multiset.foldl_swap
theorem foldr_induction' (f : α → β → β) (H : LeftCommutative f) (x : β) (q : α → Prop)
(p : β → Prop) (s : Multiset α) (hpqf : ∀ a b, q a → p b → p (f a b)) (px : p x)
(q_s : ∀ a ∈ s, q a) : p (foldr f H x s) := by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simpa
| cons a s ihs =>
simp only [forall_mem_cons, foldr_cons] at q_s ⊢
exact hpqf _ _ q_s.1 (ihs q_s.2)
#align multiset.foldr_induction' Multiset.foldr_induction'
theorem foldr_induction (f : α → α → α) (H : LeftCommutative f) (x : α) (p : α → Prop)
(s : Multiset α) (p_f : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (f a b)) (px : p x) (p_s : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) :
p (foldr f H x s) :=
foldr_induction' f H x p p s p_f px p_s
#align multiset.foldr_induction Multiset.foldr_induction
theorem foldl_induction' (f : β → α → β) (H : RightCommutative f) (x : β) (q : α → Prop)
(p : β → Prop) (s : Multiset α) (hpqf : ∀ a b, q a → p b → p (f b a)) (px : p x)
(q_s : ∀ a ∈ s, q a) : p (foldl f H x s) := by
rw [foldl_swap]
exact foldr_induction' (fun x y => f y x) (fun x y z => (H _ _ _).symm) x q p s hpqf px q_s
#align multiset.foldl_induction' Multiset.foldl_induction'
theorem foldl_induction (f : α → α → α) (H : RightCommutative f) (x : α) (p : α → Prop)
(s : Multiset α) (p_f : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (f b a)) (px : p x) (p_s : ∀ a ∈ s, p a) :
p (foldl f H x s) :=
foldl_induction' f H x p p s p_f px p_s
#align multiset.foldl_induction Multiset.foldl_induction
/-! ### Map for partial functions -/
/-- Lift of the list `pmap` operation. Map a partial function `f` over a multiset
`s` whose elements are all in the domain of `f`. -/
nonrec def pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s : Multiset α) : (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → Multiset β :=
Quot.recOn' s (fun l H => ↑(pmap f l H)) fun l₁ l₂ (pp : l₁ ~ l₂) =>
funext fun H₂ : ∀ a ∈ l₂, p a =>
have H₁ : ∀ a ∈ l₁, p a := fun a h => H₂ a (pp.subset h)
have : ∀ {s₂ e H}, @Eq.ndrec (Multiset α) l₁ (fun s => (∀ a ∈ s, p a) → Multiset β)
(fun _ => ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁)) s₂ e H = ↑(pmap f l₁ H₁) := by
intro s₂ e _; subst e; rfl
this.trans <| Quot.sound <| pp.pmap f
#align multiset.pmap Multiset.pmap
@[simp]
theorem coe_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) :
pmap f l H = l.pmap f H :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_pmap Multiset.coe_pmap
@[simp]
theorem pmap_zero {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (h : ∀ a ∈ (0 : Multiset α), p a) :
pmap f 0 h = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.pmap_zero Multiset.pmap_zero
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
∀ h : ∀ b ∈ a ::ₘ m, p b,
pmap f (a ::ₘ m) h =
f a (h a (mem_cons_self a m)) ::ₘ pmap f m fun a ha => h a <| mem_cons_of_mem ha :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun _l _h => rfl
#align multiset.pmap_cons Multiset.pmap_cons
/-- "Attach" a proof that `a ∈ s` to each element `a` in `s` to produce
a multiset on `{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : Multiset α) : Multiset { x // x ∈ s } :=
pmap Subtype.mk s fun _a => id
#align multiset.attach Multiset.attach
@[simp]
theorem coe_attach (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset { x // x ∈ l }) (@attach α l) l.attach :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_attach Multiset.coe_attach
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l a b
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
#align multiset.sizeof_lt_sizeof_of_mem Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem
theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) :
∀ H, @pmap _ _ p (fun a _ => f a) s H = map f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_eq_map p f l H
#align multiset.pmap_eq_map Multiset.pmap_eq_map
theorem pmap_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {g : ∀ a, q a → β} (s : Multiset α) :
∀ {H₁ H₂}, (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (h₁ h₂), f a h₁ = g a h₂) → pmap f s H₁ = pmap g s H₂ :=
@(Quot.inductionOn s (fun l _H₁ _H₂ h => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_congr l h))
#align multiset.pmap_congr Multiset.pmap_congr
theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s) :
∀ H, map g (pmap f s H) = pmap (fun a h => g (f a h)) s H :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.map_pmap g f l H
#align multiset.map_pmap Multiset.map_pmap
theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s) :
∀ H, pmap f s H = s.attach.map fun x => f x.1 (H _ x.2) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l H => congr_arg _ <| List.pmap_eq_map_attach f l H
#align multiset.pmap_eq_map_attach Multiset.pmap_eq_map_attach
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: Left hand does not simplify
theorem attach_map_val' (s : Multiset α) (f : α → β) : (s.attach.map fun i => f i.val) = s.map f :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg _ <| List.attach_map_coe' l f
#align multiset.attach_map_coe' Multiset.attach_map_val'
#align multiset.attach_map_val' Multiset.attach_map_val'
@[simp]
theorem attach_map_val (s : Multiset α) : s.attach.map Subtype.val = s :=
(attach_map_val' _ _).trans s.map_id
#align multiset.attach_map_coe Multiset.attach_map_val
#align multiset.attach_map_val Multiset.attach_map_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_attach (s : Multiset α) : ∀ x, x ∈ s.attach :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.mem_attach _
#align multiset.mem_attach Multiset.mem_attach
@[simp]
theorem mem_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {s H b} :
b ∈ pmap f s H ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ s), f a (H a h) = b :=
Quot.inductionOn s (fun _l _H => List.mem_pmap) H
#align multiset.mem_pmap Multiset.mem_pmap
@[simp]
theorem card_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (s H) : card (pmap f s H) = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s (fun _l _H => length_pmap) H
#align multiset.card_pmap Multiset.card_pmap
@[simp]
theorem card_attach {m : Multiset α} : card (attach m) = card m :=
card_pmap _ _ _
#align multiset.card_attach Multiset.card_attach
@[simp]
theorem attach_zero : (0 : Multiset α).attach = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.attach_zero Multiset.attach_zero
theorem attach_cons (a : α) (m : Multiset α) :
(a ::ₘ m).attach =
⟨a, mem_cons_self a m⟩ ::ₘ m.attach.map fun p => ⟨p.1, mem_cons_of_mem p.2⟩ :=
Quotient.inductionOn m fun l =>
congr_arg _ <|
congr_arg (List.cons _) <| by
rw [List.map_pmap]; exact List.pmap_congr _ fun _ _ _ _ => Subtype.eq rfl
#align multiset.attach_cons Multiset.attach_cons
section DecidablePiExists
variable {m : Multiset α}
/-- If `p` is a decidable predicate,
so is the predicate that all elements of a multiset satisfy `p`. -/
protected def decidableForallMultiset {p : α → Prop} [hp : ∀ a, Decidable (p a)] :
Decidable (∀ a ∈ m, p a) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton m fun l => decidable_of_iff (∀ a ∈ l, p a) <| by simp
#align multiset.decidable_forall_multiset Multiset.decidableForallMultiset
instance decidableDforallMultiset {p : ∀ a ∈ m, Prop} [_hp : ∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), Decidable (p a h)] :
Decidable (∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
@decidable_of_iff _ _
(Iff.intro (fun h a ha => h ⟨a, ha⟩ (mem_attach _ _)) fun h ⟨_a, _ha⟩ _ => h _ _)
(@Multiset.decidableForallMultiset _ m.attach (fun a => p a.1 a.2) _)
#align multiset.decidable_dforall_multiset Multiset.decidableDforallMultiset
/-- decidable equality for functions whose domain is bounded by multisets -/
instance decidableEqPiMultiset {β : α → Type*} [h : ∀ a, DecidableEq (β a)] :
DecidableEq (∀ a ∈ m, β a) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), f a h = g a h) (by simp [Function.funext_iff])
#align multiset.decidable_eq_pi_multiset Multiset.decidableEqPiMultiset
/-- If `p` is a decidable predicate,
so is the existence of an element in a multiset satisfying `p`. -/
protected def decidableExistsMultiset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∃ x ∈ m, p x) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton m fun l => decidable_of_iff (∃ a ∈ l, p a) <| by simp
#align multiset.decidable_exists_multiset Multiset.decidableExistsMultiset
instance decidableDexistsMultiset {p : ∀ a ∈ m, Prop} [_hp : ∀ (a) (h : a ∈ m), Decidable (p a h)] :
Decidable (∃ (a : _) (h : a ∈ m), p a h) :=
@decidable_of_iff _ _
(Iff.intro (fun ⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, _, ha₂⟩ => ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩) fun ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, ha₁⟩, mem_attach _ _, ha₂⟩)
(@Multiset.decidableExistsMultiset { a // a ∈ m } m.attach (fun a => p a.1 a.2) _)
#align multiset.decidable_dexists_multiset Multiset.decidableDexistsMultiset
end DecidablePiExists
/-! ### Subtraction -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u : Multiset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s - t` is the multiset such that `count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t` for all `a`
(note that it is truncated subtraction, so it is `0` if `count a t ≥ count a s`). -/
protected def sub (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
(Quotient.liftOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => (l₁.diff l₂ : Multiset α)) fun _v₁ _v₂ _w₁ _w₂ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.diff p₂
#align multiset.sub Multiset.sub
instance : Sub (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sub⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (s t : List α) : (s - t : Multiset α) = (s.diff t : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_sub Multiset.coe_sub
/-- This is a special case of `tsub_zero`, which should be used instead of this.
This is needed to prove `OrderedSub (Multiset α)`. -/
protected theorem sub_zero (s : Multiset α) : s - 0 = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => rfl
#align multiset.sub_zero Multiset.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem sub_cons (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : s - a ::ₘ t = s.erase a - t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg _ <| diff_cons _ _ _
#align multiset.sub_cons Multiset.sub_cons
/-- This is a special case of `tsub_le_iff_right`, which should be used instead of this.
This is needed to prove `OrderedSub (Multiset α)`. -/
protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add : s - t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u + t := by
revert s
exact @(Multiset.induction_on t (by simp [Multiset.sub_zero]) fun a t IH s => by
simp [IH, erase_le_iff_le_cons])
#align multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add
instance : OrderedSub (Multiset α) :=
⟨fun _n _m _k => Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add⟩
theorem cons_sub_of_le (a : α) {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : a ::ₘ s - t = a ::ₘ (s - t) := by
rw [← singleton_add, ← singleton_add, add_tsub_assoc_of_le h]
#align multiset.cons_sub_of_le Multiset.cons_sub_of_le
theorem sub_eq_fold_erase (s t : Multiset α) : s - t = foldl erase erase_comm s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ => by
show ofList (l₁.diff l₂) = foldl erase erase_comm l₁ l₂
rw [diff_eq_foldl l₁ l₂]
symm
exact foldl_hom _ _ _ _ _ fun x y => rfl
#align multiset.sub_eq_fold_erase Multiset.sub_eq_fold_erase
@[simp]
theorem card_sub {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) : card (s - t) = card s - card t :=
Nat.eq_sub_of_add_eq $ by rw [← card_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
#align multiset.card_sub Multiset.card_sub
/-! ### Union -/
/-- `s ∪ t` is the lattice join operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∪ t` is the maximum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def union (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
s - t + t
#align multiset.union Multiset.union
instance : Union (Multiset α) :=
⟨union⟩
theorem union_def (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t = s - t + t :=
rfl
#align multiset.union_def Multiset.union_def
theorem le_union_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ≤ s ∪ t :=
le_tsub_add
#align multiset.le_union_left Multiset.le_union_left
theorem le_union_right (s t : Multiset α) : t ≤ s ∪ t :=
le_add_left _ _
#align multiset.le_union_right Multiset.le_union_right
theorem eq_union_left : t ≤ s → s ∪ t = s :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le
#align multiset.eq_union_left Multiset.eq_union_left
theorem union_le_union_right (h : s ≤ t) (u) : s ∪ u ≤ t ∪ u :=
add_le_add_right (tsub_le_tsub_right h _) u
#align multiset.union_le_union_right Multiset.union_le_union_right
theorem union_le (h₁ : s ≤ u) (h₂ : t ≤ u) : s ∪ t ≤ u := by
rw [← eq_union_left h₂]; exact union_le_union_right h₁ t
#align multiset.union_le Multiset.union_le
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => (mem_add.1 h).imp_left (mem_of_le tsub_le_self),
(Or.elim · (mem_of_le <| le_union_left _ _) (mem_of_le <| le_union_right _ _))⟩
#align multiset.mem_union Multiset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem map_union [DecidableEq β] {f : α → β} (finj : Function.Injective f) {s t : Multiset α} :
map f (s ∪ t) = map f s ∪ map f t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun l₁ l₂ =>
congr_arg ofList (by rw [List.map_append f, List.map_diff finj])
#align multiset.map_union Multiset.map_union
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp] theorem zero_union : 0 ∪ s = s := by
simp [union_def]
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp] theorem union_zero : s ∪ 0 = s := by
simp [union_def]
/-! ### Intersection -/
/-- `s ∩ t` is the lattice meet operation with respect to the
multiset `≤`. The multiplicity of `a` in `s ∩ t` is the minimum
of the multiplicities in `s` and `t`. -/
def inter (s t : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ s t (fun l₁ l₂ => (l₁.bagInter l₂ : Multiset α)) fun _v₁ _v₂ _w₁ _w₂ p₁ p₂ =>
Quot.sound <| p₁.bagInter p₂
#align multiset.inter Multiset.inter
instance : Inter (Multiset α) :=
⟨inter⟩
@[simp]
theorem inter_zero (s : Multiset α) : s ∩ 0 = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList l.bagInter_nil
#align multiset.inter_zero Multiset.inter_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_inter (s : Multiset α) : 0 ∩ s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList l.nil_bagInter
#align multiset.zero_inter Multiset.zero_inter
@[simp]
theorem cons_inter_of_pos {a} (s : Multiset α) {t} : a ∈ t → (a ::ₘ s) ∩ t = a ::ₘ s ∩ t.erase a :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h => congr_arg ofList <| cons_bagInter_of_pos _ h
#align multiset.cons_inter_of_pos Multiset.cons_inter_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem cons_inter_of_neg {a} (s : Multiset α) {t} : a ∉ t → (a ::ₘ s) ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ h => congr_arg ofList <| cons_bagInter_of_neg _ h
#align multiset.cons_inter_of_neg Multiset.cons_inter_of_neg
theorem inter_le_left (s t : Multiset α) : s ∩ t ≤ s :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => (bagInter_sublist_left _ _).subperm
#align multiset.inter_le_left Multiset.inter_le_left
theorem inter_le_right (s : Multiset α) : ∀ t, s ∩ t ≤ t :=
Multiset.induction_on s (fun t => (zero_inter t).symm ▸ zero_le _) fun a s IH t =>
if h : a ∈ t then by simpa [h] using cons_le_cons a (IH (t.erase a)) else by simp [h, IH]
#align multiset.inter_le_right Multiset.inter_le_right
theorem le_inter (h₁ : s ≤ t) (h₂ : s ≤ u) : s ≤ t ∩ u := by
revert s u; refine @(Multiset.induction_on t ?_ fun a t IH => ?_) <;> intros s u h₁ h₂
· simpa only [zero_inter, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using h₁
by_cases h : a ∈ u
· rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, ← erase_le_iff_le_cons]
exact IH (erase_le_iff_le_cons.2 h₁) (erase_le_erase _ h₂)
· rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h]
exact IH ((le_cons_of_not_mem <| mt (mem_of_le h₂) h).1 h₁) h₂
#align multiset.le_inter Multiset.le_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter : a ∈ s ∩ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h, mem_of_le (inter_le_right _ _) h⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by
rw [← cons_erase h₁, cons_inter_of_pos _ h₂]; apply mem_cons_self⟩
#align multiset.mem_inter Multiset.mem_inter
instance : Lattice (Multiset α) :=
{ sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := @union_le _ _
le_sup_left := le_union_left
le_sup_right := le_union_right
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := @le_inter _ _
inf_le_left := inter_le_left
inf_le_right := inter_le_right }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union (s t : Multiset α) : s ⊔ t = s ∪ t :=
rfl
#align multiset.sup_eq_union Multiset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s ⊓ t = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align multiset.inf_eq_inter Multiset.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_inter_iff : s ≤ t ∩ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u :=
le_inf_iff
#align multiset.le_inter_iff Multiset.le_inter_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_le_iff : s ∪ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u :=
sup_le_iff
#align multiset.union_le_iff Multiset.union_le_iff
theorem union_comm (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t = t ∪ s := sup_comm _ _
#align multiset.union_comm Multiset.union_comm
theorem inter_comm (s t : Multiset α) : s ∩ t = t ∩ s := inf_comm _ _
#align multiset.inter_comm Multiset.inter_comm
theorem eq_union_right (h : s ≤ t) : s ∪ t = t := by rw [union_comm, eq_union_left h]
#align multiset.eq_union_right Multiset.eq_union_right
theorem union_le_union_left (h : s ≤ t) (u) : u ∪ s ≤ u ∪ t :=
sup_le_sup_left h _
#align multiset.union_le_union_left Multiset.union_le_union_left
theorem union_le_add (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t ≤ s + t :=
union_le (le_add_right _ _) (le_add_left _ _)
#align multiset.union_le_add Multiset.union_le_add
theorem union_add_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s ∪ t + u = s + u ∪ (t + u) := by
simpa [(· ∪ ·), union, eq_comm, add_assoc] using
show s + u - (t + u) = s - t by rw [add_comm t, tsub_add_eq_tsub_tsub, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align multiset.union_add_distrib Multiset.union_add_distrib
theorem add_union_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s + (t ∪ u) = s + t ∪ (s + u) := by
rw [add_comm, union_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
#align multiset.add_union_distrib Multiset.add_union_distrib
theorem cons_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ (s ∪ t) = a ::ₘ s ∪ a ::ₘ t := by
simpa using add_union_distrib (a ::ₘ 0) s t
#align multiset.cons_union_distrib Multiset.cons_union_distrib
theorem inter_add_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s ∩ t + u = (s + u) ∩ (t + u) := by
by_contra h
cases'
lt_iff_cons_le.1
(lt_of_le_of_ne
(le_inter (add_le_add_right (inter_le_left s t) u)
(add_le_add_right (inter_le_right s t) u))
h) with
a hl
rw [← cons_add] at hl
exact
not_le_of_lt (lt_cons_self (s ∩ t) a)
(le_inter (le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_left _ _)))
(le_of_add_le_add_right (le_trans hl (inter_le_right _ _))))
#align multiset.inter_add_distrib Multiset.inter_add_distrib
theorem add_inter_distrib (s t u : Multiset α) : s + t ∩ u = (s + t) ∩ (s + u) := by
rw [add_comm, inter_add_distrib, add_comm s, add_comm s]
#align multiset.add_inter_distrib Multiset.add_inter_distrib
theorem cons_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s ∩ t = (a ::ₘ s) ∩ (a ::ₘ t) := by
simp
#align multiset.cons_inter_distrib Multiset.cons_inter_distrib
theorem union_add_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s ∪ t + s ∩ t = s + t := by
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [union_add_distrib]
refine union_le (add_le_add_left (inter_le_right _ _) _) ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_le_add_right (inter_le_left _ _) _
· rw [add_comm, add_inter_distrib]
refine le_inter (add_le_add_right (le_union_right _ _) _) ?_
rw [add_comm]
exact add_le_add_right (le_union_left _ _) _
#align multiset.union_add_inter Multiset.union_add_inter
theorem sub_add_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s - t + s ∩ t = s := by
rw [inter_comm]
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a t IH s => ?_
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [cons_inter_of_pos _ h, sub_cons, add_cons, IH, cons_erase h]
· rw [cons_inter_of_neg _ h, sub_cons, erase_of_not_mem h, IH]
#align multiset.sub_add_inter Multiset.sub_add_inter
theorem sub_inter (s t : Multiset α) : s - s ∩ t = s - t :=
add_right_cancel <| by rw [sub_add_inter s t, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (inter_le_left s t)]
#align multiset.sub_inter Multiset.sub_inter
end
/-! ### `Multiset.filter` -/
section
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
/-- `Filter p s` returns the elements in `s` (with the same multiplicities)
which satisfy `p`, and removes the rest. -/
def filter (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (List.filter p l : Multiset α)) fun _l₁ _l₂ h => Quot.sound <| h.filter p
#align multiset.filter Multiset.filter
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma filter_coe (l : List α) : filter p l = l.filter p := rfl
#align multiset.coe_filter Multiset.filter_coe
@[simp]
theorem filter_zero : filter p 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.filter_zero Multiset.filter_zero
theorem filter_congr {p q : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] {s : Multiset α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x) → filter p s = filter q s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l h => congr_arg ofList <| filter_congr' <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_congr Multiset.filter_congr
@[simp]
theorem filter_add (s t : Multiset α) : filter p (s + t) = filter p s + filter p t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _l₁ _l₂ => congr_arg ofList <| filter_append _ _
#align multiset.filter_add Multiset.filter_add
@[simp]
theorem filter_le (s : Multiset α) : filter p s ≤ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => (filter_sublist _).subperm
#align multiset.filter_le Multiset.filter_le
@[simp]
theorem filter_subset (s : Multiset α) : filter p s ⊆ s :=
subset_of_le <| filter_le _ _
#align multiset.filter_subset Multiset.filter_subset
theorem filter_le_filter {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : filter p s ≤ filter p t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.filter (p ·)).subperm
#align multiset.filter_le_filter Multiset.filter_le_filter
theorem monotone_filter_left : Monotone (filter p) := fun _s _t => filter_le_filter p
#align multiset.monotone_filter_left Multiset.monotone_filter_left
theorem monotone_filter_right (s : Multiset α) ⦃p q : α → Prop⦄ [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(h : ∀ b, p b → q b) :
s.filter p ≤ s.filter q :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => (l.monotone_filter_right <| by simpa using h).subperm
#align multiset.monotone_filter_right Multiset.monotone_filter_right
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem filter_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → filter p (a ::ₘ s) = a ::ₘ filter p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l h => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_cons_of_pos l <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_cons_of_pos Multiset.filter_cons_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem filter_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬p a → filter p (a ::ₘ s) = filter p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l h => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_cons_of_neg l <| by simpa using h
#align multiset.filter_cons_of_neg Multiset.filter_cons_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem mem_filter {a : α} {s} : a ∈ filter p s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simpa using List.mem_filter (p := (p ·))
#align multiset.mem_filter Multiset.mem_filter
theorem of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : p a :=
(mem_filter.1 h).2
#align multiset.of_mem_filter Multiset.of_mem_filter
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {s} (h : a ∈ filter p s) : a ∈ s :=
(mem_filter.1 h).1
#align multiset.mem_of_mem_filter Multiset.mem_of_mem_filter
theorem mem_filter_of_mem {a : α} {l} (m : a ∈ l) (h : p a) : a ∈ filter p l :=
mem_filter.2 ⟨m, h⟩
#align multiset.mem_filter_of_mem Multiset.mem_filter_of_mem
theorem filter_eq_self {s} : filter p s = s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l =>
Iff.trans ⟨fun h => (filter_sublist _).eq_of_length (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h),
congr_arg ofList⟩ <| by simp
#align multiset.filter_eq_self Multiset.filter_eq_self
theorem filter_eq_nil {s} : filter p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l =>
Iff.trans ⟨fun h => eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (@congr_arg _ _ _ _ card h), congr_arg ofList⟩ <|
by simpa using List.filter_eq_nil (p := (p ·))
#align multiset.filter_eq_nil Multiset.filter_eq_nil
theorem le_filter {s t} : s ≤ filter p t ↔ s ≤ t ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_trans h (filter_le _ _), fun _a m => of_mem_filter (mem_of_le h m)⟩, fun ⟨h, al⟩ =>
filter_eq_self.2 al ▸ filter_le_filter p h⟩
#align multiset.le_filter Multiset.le_filter
theorem filter_cons {a : α} (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (a ::ₘ s) = (if p a then {a} else 0) + filter p s := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, singleton_add]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h, zero_add]
#align multiset.filter_cons Multiset.filter_cons
theorem filter_singleton {a : α} (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
filter p {a} = if p a then {a} else ∅ := by
simp only [singleton, filter_cons, filter_zero, add_zero, empty_eq_zero]
#align multiset.filter_singleton Multiset.filter_singleton
theorem filter_nsmul (s : Multiset α) (n : ℕ) : filter p (n • s) = n • filter p s := by
refine s.induction_on ?_ ?_
· simp only [filter_zero, nsmul_zero]
· intro a ha ih
rw [nsmul_cons, filter_add, ih, filter_cons, nsmul_add]
congr
split_ifs with hp <;>
· simp only [filter_eq_self, nsmul_zero, filter_eq_nil]
intro b hb
rwa [mem_singleton.mp (mem_of_mem_nsmul hb)]
#align multiset.filter_nsmul Multiset.filter_nsmul
variable (p)
@[simp]
theorem filter_sub [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s - t) = filter p s - filter p t := by
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun a t IH s => ?_
rw [sub_cons, IH]
by_cases h : p a
· rw [filter_cons_of_pos _ h, sub_cons]
congr
by_cases m : a ∈ s
· rw [← cons_inj_right a, ← filter_cons_of_pos _ h, cons_erase (mem_filter_of_mem m h),
cons_erase m]
· rw [erase_of_not_mem m, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_filter m)]
· rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h]
by_cases m : a ∈ s
· rw [(by rw [filter_cons_of_neg _ h] : filter p (erase s a) = filter p (a ::ₘ erase s a)),
cons_erase m]
· rw [erase_of_not_mem m]
#align multiset.filter_sub Multiset.filter_sub
@[simp]
theorem filter_union [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s ∪ t) = filter p s ∪ filter p t := by simp [(· ∪ ·), union]
#align multiset.filter_union Multiset.filter_union
@[simp]
theorem filter_inter [DecidableEq α] (s t : Multiset α) :
filter p (s ∩ t) = filter p s ∩ filter p t :=
le_antisymm
(le_inter (filter_le_filter _ <| inter_le_left _ _)
(filter_le_filter _ <| inter_le_right _ _)) <|
le_filter.2
⟨inf_le_inf (filter_le _ _) (filter_le _ _), fun _a h =>
of_mem_filter (mem_of_le (inter_le_left _ _) h)⟩
#align multiset.filter_inter Multiset.filter_inter
@[simp]
theorem filter_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp
#align multiset.filter_filter Multiset.filter_filter
lemma filter_comm (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filter q s) = filter q (filter p s) := by simp [and_comm]
#align multiset.filter_comm Multiset.filter_comm
theorem filter_add_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p s + filter q s = filter (fun a => p a ∨ q a) s + filter (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s :=
Multiset.induction_on s rfl fun a s IH => by by_cases p a <;> by_cases q a <;> simp [*]
#align multiset.filter_add_filter Multiset.filter_add_filter
theorem filter_add_not (s : Multiset α) : filter p s + filter (fun a => ¬p a) s = s := by
rw [filter_add_filter, filter_eq_self.2, filter_eq_nil.2]
· simp only [add_zero]
· simp [Decidable.em, -Bool.not_eq_true, -not_and, not_and_or, or_comm]
· simp only [Bool.not_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq, Bool.eq_false_or_eq_true,
decide_True, implies_true, Decidable.em]
#align multiset.filter_add_not Multiset.filter_add_not
theorem map_filter (f : β → α) (s : Multiset β) : filter p (map f s) = map f (filter (p ∘ f) s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [List.map_filter]; rfl
#align multiset.map_filter Multiset.map_filter
lemma map_filter' {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Multiset α)
[DecidablePred fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b] :
(s.filter p).map f = (s.map f).filter fun b => ∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b := by
simp [(· ∘ ·), map_filter, hf.eq_iff]
#align multiset.map_filter' Multiset.map_filter'
lemma card_filter_le_iff (s : Multiset α) (P : α → Prop) [DecidablePred P] (n : ℕ) :
card (s.filter P) ≤ n ↔ ∀ s' ≤ s, n < card s' → ∃ a ∈ s', ¬ P a := by
fconstructor
· intro H s' hs' s'_card
by_contra! rid
have card := card_le_card (monotone_filter_left P hs') |>.trans H
exact s'_card.not_le (filter_eq_self.mpr rid ▸ card)
· contrapose!
exact fun H ↦ ⟨s.filter P, filter_le _ _, H, fun a ha ↦ (mem_filter.mp ha).2⟩
/-! ### Simultaneously filter and map elements of a multiset -/
/-- `filterMap f s` is a combination filter/map operation on `s`.
The function `f : α → Option β` is applied to each element of `s`;
if `f a` is `some b` then `b` is added to the result, otherwise
`a` is removed from the resulting multiset. -/
def filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset β :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (List.filterMap f l : Multiset β))
fun _l₁ _l₂ h => Quot.sound <| h.filterMap f
#align multiset.filter_map Multiset.filterMap
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma filterMap_coe (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) : filterMap f l = l.filterMap f := rfl
#align multiset.coe_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_coe
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_zero (f : α → Option β) : filterMap f 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.filter_map_zero Multiset.filterMap_zero
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_cons_none {f : α → Option β} (a : α) (s : Multiset α) (h : f a = none) :
filterMap f (a ::ₘ s) = filterMap f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_cons_none a l h
#align multiset.filter_map_cons_none Multiset.filterMap_cons_none
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_cons_some (f : α → Option β) (a : α) (s : Multiset α) {b : β}
(h : f a = some b) : filterMap f (a ::ₘ s) = b ::ₘ filterMap f s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_cons_some f a l h
#align multiset.filter_map_cons_some Multiset.filterMap_cons_some
theorem filterMap_eq_map (f : α → β) : filterMap (some ∘ f) = map f :=
funext fun s =>
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| congr_fun (List.filterMap_eq_map f) l
#align multiset.filter_map_eq_map Multiset.filterMap_eq_map
theorem filterMap_eq_filter : filterMap (Option.guard p) = filter p :=
funext fun s =>
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| by
rw [← List.filterMap_eq_filter]
congr; funext a; simp
#align multiset.filter_map_eq_filter Multiset.filterMap_eq_filter
theorem filterMap_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (g : β → Option γ) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap g (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).bind g) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_filterMap f g l
#align multiset.filter_map_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_filterMap
theorem map_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (g : β → γ) (s : Multiset α) :
map g (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).map g) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.map_filterMap f g l
#align multiset.map_filter_map Multiset.map_filterMap
theorem filterMap_map (f : α → β) (g : β → Option γ) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap g (map f s) = filterMap (g ∘ f) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_map f g l
#align multiset.filter_map_map Multiset.filterMap_map
theorem filter_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (s : Multiset α) :
filter p (filterMap f s) = filterMap (fun x => (f x).filter p) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filter_filterMap f p l
#align multiset.filter_filter_map Multiset.filter_filterMap
theorem filterMap_filter (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) :
filterMap f (filter p s) = filterMap (fun x => if p x then f x else none) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| by simpa using List.filterMap_filter p f l
#align multiset.filter_map_filter Multiset.filterMap_filter
@[simp]
theorem filterMap_some (s : Multiset α) : filterMap some s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.filterMap_some l
#align multiset.filter_map_some Multiset.filterMap_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : Multiset α) {b : β} :
b ∈ filterMap f s ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = some b :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => List.mem_filterMap f l
#align multiset.mem_filter_map Multiset.mem_filterMap
theorem map_filterMap_of_inv (f : α → Option β) (g : β → α) (H : ∀ x : α, (f x).map g = some x)
(s : Multiset α) : map g (filterMap f s) = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => congr_arg ofList <| List.map_filterMap_of_inv f g H l
#align multiset.map_filter_map_of_inv Multiset.map_filterMap_of_inv
theorem filterMap_le_filterMap (f : α → Option β) {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) :
filterMap f s ≤ filterMap f t :=
leInductionOn h fun h => (h.filterMap _).subperm
#align multiset.filter_map_le_filter_map Multiset.filterMap_le_filterMap
/-! ### countP -/
/-- `countP p s` counts the number of elements of `s` (with multiplicity) that
satisfy `p`. -/
def countP (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s (List.countP p) fun _l₁ _l₂ => Perm.countP_eq (p ·)
#align multiset.countp Multiset.countP
@[simp]
theorem coe_countP (l : List α) : countP p l = l.countP p :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_countp Multiset.coe_countP
@[simp]
theorem countP_zero : countP p 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.countp_zero Multiset.countP_zero
variable {p}
@[simp]
theorem countP_cons_of_pos {a : α} (s) : p a → countP p (a ::ₘ s) = countP p s + 1 :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simpa using List.countP_cons_of_pos (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_cons_of_pos Multiset.countP_cons_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem countP_cons_of_neg {a : α} (s) : ¬p a → countP p (a ::ₘ s) = countP p s :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simpa using List.countP_cons_of_neg (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_cons_of_neg Multiset.countP_cons_of_neg
variable (p)
theorem countP_cons (b : α) (s) : countP p (b ::ₘ s) = countP p s + if p b then 1 else 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s <| by simp [List.countP_cons]
#align multiset.countp_cons Multiset.countP_cons
theorem countP_eq_card_filter (s) : countP p s = card (filter p s) :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => l.countP_eq_length_filter (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_eq_card_filter Multiset.countP_eq_card_filter
theorem countP_le_card (s) : countP p s ≤ card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => countP_le_length (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_le_card Multiset.countP_le_card
@[simp]
theorem countP_add (s t) : countP p (s + t) = countP p s + countP p t := by
simp [countP_eq_card_filter]
#align multiset.countp_add Multiset.countP_add
@[simp]
theorem countP_nsmul (s) (n : ℕ) : countP p (n • s) = n * countP p s := by
induction n <;> simp [*, succ_nsmul, succ_mul, zero_nsmul]
#align multiset.countp_nsmul Multiset.countP_nsmul
theorem card_eq_countP_add_countP (s) : card s = countP p s + countP (fun x => ¬p x) s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by simp [l.length_eq_countP_add_countP p]
#align multiset.card_eq_countp_add_countp Multiset.card_eq_countP_add_countP
/-- `countP p`, the number of elements of a multiset satisfying `p`, promoted to an
`AddMonoidHom`. -/
def countPAddMonoidHom : Multiset α →+ ℕ where
toFun := countP p
map_zero' := countP_zero _
map_add' := countP_add _
#align multiset.countp_add_monoid_hom Multiset.countPAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_countPAddMonoidHom : (countPAddMonoidHom p : Multiset α → ℕ) = countP p :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_countp_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_countPAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem countP_sub [DecidableEq α] {s t : Multiset α} (h : t ≤ s) :
countP p (s - t) = countP p s - countP p t := by
simp [countP_eq_card_filter, h, filter_le_filter]
#align multiset.countp_sub Multiset.countP_sub
theorem countP_le_of_le {s t} (h : s ≤ t) : countP p s ≤ countP p t := by
simpa [countP_eq_card_filter] using card_le_card (filter_le_filter p h)
#align multiset.countp_le_of_le Multiset.countP_le_of_le
@[simp]
theorem countP_filter (q) [DecidablePred q] (s : Multiset α) :
countP p (filter q s) = countP (fun a => p a ∧ q a) s := by simp [countP_eq_card_filter]
#align multiset.countp_filter Multiset.countP_filter
theorem countP_eq_countP_filter_add (s) (p q : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] :
countP p s = (filter q s).countP p + (filter (fun a => ¬q a) s).countP p :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert l.countP_eq_countP_filter_add (p ·) (q ·)
simp [countP_filter]
#align multiset.countp_eq_countp_filter_add Multiset.countP_eq_countP_filter_add
@[simp]
theorem countP_True {s : Multiset α} : countP (fun _ => True) s = card s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.countP_true
#align multiset.countp_true Multiset.countP_True
@[simp]
theorem countP_False {s : Multiset α} : countP (fun _ => False) s = 0 :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => List.countP_false
#align multiset.countp_false Multiset.countP_False
theorem countP_map (f : α → β) (s : Multiset α) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
countP p (map f s) = card (s.filter fun a => p (f a)) := by
refine Multiset.induction_on s ?_ fun a t IH => ?_
· rw [map_zero, countP_zero, filter_zero, card_zero]
· rw [map_cons, countP_cons, IH, filter_cons, card_add, apply_ite card, card_zero, card_singleton,
add_comm]
#align multiset.countp_map Multiset.countP_map
-- Porting note: `Lean.Internal.coeM` forces us to type-ascript `{a // a ∈ s}`
lemma countP_attach (s : Multiset α) : s.attach.countP (fun a : {a // a ∈ s} ↦ p a) = s.countP p :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, coe_countP]
-- Porting note: was
-- rw [quot_mk_to_coe, coe_attach, coe_countP]
-- exact List.countP_attach _ _
rw [coe_attach]
refine (coe_countP _ _).trans ?_
convert List.countP_attach _ _
rfl
#align multiset.countp_attach Multiset.countP_attach
lemma filter_attach (s : Multiset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.attach.filter fun a : {a // a ∈ s} ↦ p ↑a) =
(s.filter p).attach.map (Subtype.map id fun _ ↦ Multiset.mem_of_mem_filter) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l ↦ congr_arg _ (List.filter_attach l p)
#align multiset.filter_attach Multiset.filter_attach
variable {p}
theorem countP_pos {s} : 0 < countP p s ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simpa using List.countP_pos (p ·)
#align multiset.countp_pos Multiset.countP_pos
theorem countP_eq_zero {s} : countP p s = 0 ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ¬p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simp [List.countP_eq_zero]
#align multiset.countp_eq_zero Multiset.countP_eq_zero
theorem countP_eq_card {s} : countP p s = card s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, p a :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _l => by simp [List.countP_eq_length]
#align multiset.countp_eq_card Multiset.countP_eq_card
theorem countP_pos_of_mem {s a} (h : a ∈ s) (pa : p a) : 0 < countP p s :=
countP_pos.2 ⟨_, h, pa⟩
#align multiset.countp_pos_of_mem Multiset.countP_pos_of_mem
theorem countP_congr {s s' : Multiset α} (hs : s = s')
{p p' : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred p']
(hp : ∀ x ∈ s, p x = p' x) : s.countP p = s'.countP p' := by
revert hs hp
exact Quot.induction_on₂ s s'
(fun l l' hs hp => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_eq_coe] at hs
apply hs.countP_congr
simpa using hp)
#align multiset.countp_congr Multiset.countP_congr
end
/-! ### Multiplicity of an element -/
section
variable [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α}
/-- `count a s` is the multiplicity of `a` in `s`. -/
def count (a : α) : Multiset α → ℕ :=
countP (a = ·)
#align multiset.count Multiset.count
@[simp]
theorem coe_count (a : α) (l : List α) : count a (ofList l) = l.count a := by
simp_rw [count, List.count, coe_countP (a = ·) l, @eq_comm _ a]
rfl
#align multiset.coe_count Multiset.coe_count
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this at EOF, but not right now
theorem count_zero (a : α) : count a 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.count_zero Multiset.count_zero
@[simp]
theorem count_cons_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a (a ::ₘ s) = count a s + 1 :=
countP_cons_of_pos _ <| rfl
#align multiset.count_cons_self Multiset.count_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem count_cons_of_ne {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) (s : Multiset α) : count a (b ::ₘ s) = count a s :=
countP_cons_of_neg _ <| h
#align multiset.count_cons_of_ne Multiset.count_cons_of_ne
theorem count_le_card (a : α) (s) : count a s ≤ card s :=
countP_le_card _ _
#align multiset.count_le_card Multiset.count_le_card
theorem count_le_of_le (a : α) {s t} : s ≤ t → count a s ≤ count a t :=
countP_le_of_le _
#align multiset.count_le_of_le Multiset.count_le_of_le
theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a s ≤ count a (b ::ₘ s) :=
count_le_of_le _ (le_cons_self _ _)
#align multiset.count_le_count_cons Multiset.count_le_count_cons
theorem count_cons (a b : α) (s : Multiset α) :
count a (b ::ₘ s) = count a s + if a = b then 1 else 0 :=
countP_cons (a = ·) _ _
#align multiset.count_cons Multiset.count_cons
theorem count_singleton_self (a : α) : count a ({a} : Multiset α) = 1 :=
count_eq_one_of_mem (nodup_singleton a) <| mem_singleton_self a
#align multiset.count_singleton_self Multiset.count_singleton_self
theorem count_singleton (a b : α) : count a ({b} : Multiset α) = if a = b then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [count_cons, ← cons_zero, count_zero, zero_add]
#align multiset.count_singleton Multiset.count_singleton
@[simp]
theorem count_add (a : α) : ∀ s t, count a (s + t) = count a s + count a t :=
countP_add _
#align multiset.count_add Multiset.count_add
/-- `count a`, the multiplicity of `a` in a multiset, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def countAddMonoidHom (a : α) : Multiset α →+ ℕ :=
countPAddMonoidHom (a = ·)
#align multiset.count_add_monoid_hom Multiset.countAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_countAddMonoidHom {a : α} : (countAddMonoidHom a : Multiset α → ℕ) = count a :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_count_add_monoid_hom Multiset.coe_countAddMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem count_nsmul (a : α) (n s) : count a (n • s) = n * count a s := by
induction n <;> simp [*, succ_nsmul, succ_mul, zero_nsmul]
#align multiset.count_nsmul Multiset.count_nsmul
@[simp]
lemma count_attach (a : {x // x ∈ s}) : s.attach.count a = s.count ↑a :=
Eq.trans (countP_congr rfl fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
#align multiset.count_attach Multiset.count_attach
theorem count_pos {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : 0 < count a s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp [count, countP_pos]
#align multiset.count_pos Multiset.count_pos
theorem one_le_count_iff_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : 1 ≤ count a s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [succ_le_iff, count_pos]
#align multiset.one_le_count_iff_mem Multiset.one_le_count_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_zero_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) : count a s = 0 :=
by_contradiction fun h' => h <| count_pos.1 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h')
#align multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem Multiset.count_eq_zero_of_not_mem
lemma count_ne_zero {a : α} : count a s ≠ 0 ↔ a ∈ s := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm.trans count_pos
#align multiset.count_ne_zero Multiset.count_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma count_eq_zero {a : α} : count a s = 0 ↔ a ∉ s := count_ne_zero.not_right
#align multiset.count_eq_zero Multiset.count_eq_zero
theorem count_eq_card {a : α} {s} : count a s = card s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a = x := by
simp [countP_eq_card, count, @eq_comm _ a]
#align multiset.count_eq_card Multiset.count_eq_card
@[simp]
theorem count_replicate_self (a : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (replicate n a) = n := by
convert List.count_replicate_self a n
rw [← coe_count, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.count_replicate_self Multiset.count_replicate_self
theorem count_replicate (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : count a (replicate n b) = if a = b then n else 0 := by
convert List.count_replicate a b n
rw [← coe_count, coe_replicate]
#align multiset.count_replicate Multiset.count_replicate
@[simp]
theorem count_erase_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : count a (erase s a) = count a s - 1 :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert List.count_erase_self a l <;> rw [← coe_count] <;> simp
#align multiset.count_erase_self Multiset.count_erase_self
@[simp]
theorem count_erase_of_ne {a b : α} (ab : a ≠ b) (s : Multiset α) :
count a (erase s b) = count a s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
convert List.count_erase_of_ne ab l <;> rw [← coe_count] <;> simp
#align multiset.count_erase_of_ne Multiset.count_erase_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem count_sub (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s - t) = count a s - count a t := by
revert s; refine Multiset.induction_on t (by simp) fun b t IH s => ?_
rw [sub_cons, IH]
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne a b with rfl | ab
· rw [count_erase_self, count_cons_self, Nat.sub_sub, add_comm]
· rw [count_erase_of_ne ab, count_cons_of_ne ab]
#align multiset.count_sub Multiset.count_sub
@[simp]
theorem count_union (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s ∪ t) = max (count a s) (count a t) := by
simp [(· ∪ ·), union, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
#align multiset.count_union Multiset.count_union
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 2,563 | 2,565 | theorem count_inter (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) : count a (s ∩ t) = min (count a s) (count a t) := by |
apply @Nat.add_left_cancel (count a (s - t))
rw [← count_add, sub_add_inter, count_sub, Nat.sub_add_min_cancel]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jan-David Salchow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.WithSeminorms
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.StrongTopology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.LinearIsometry
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Tactic.SuppressCompilation
#align_import analysis.normed_space.operator_norm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
/-!
# Operator norm on the space of continuous linear maps
Define the operator (semi)-norm on the space of continuous (semi)linear maps between (semi)-normed
spaces, and prove its basic properties. In particular, show that this space is itself a semi-normed
space.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0` we start setting up the
theory for `SeminormedAddCommGroup`. Later we will specialize to `NormedAddCommGroup` in the
file `NormedSpace.lean`.
Note that most of statements that apply to semilinear maps only hold when the ring homomorphism
is isometric, as expressed by the typeclass `[RingHomIsometric σ]`.
-/
suppress_compilation
open Bornology
open Filter hiding map_smul
open scoped Classical NNReal Topology Uniformity
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ E Eₗ F Fₗ G Gₗ 𝓕 : Type*}
section SemiNormed
open Metric ContinuousLinearMap
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup Eₗ] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup Fₗ] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [SeminormedAddCommGroup Gₗ]
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₃]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Eₗ] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Fₗ] [NormedSpace 𝕜₃ G]
{σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- If `‖x‖ = 0` and `f` is continuous then `‖f x‖ = 0`. -/
theorem norm_image_of_norm_zero [SemilinearMapClass 𝓕 σ₁₂ E F] (f : 𝓕) (hf : Continuous f) {x : E}
(hx : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖f x‖ = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_zero_iff_norm, ← specializes_iff_mem_closure, ← map_zero f] at *
exact hx.map hf
#align norm_image_of_norm_zero norm_image_of_norm_zero
section
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
theorem SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_shell_semi_normed [SemilinearMapClass 𝓕 σ₁₂ E F] (f : 𝓕)
{ε C : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {c : 𝕜} (hc : 1 < ‖c‖)
(hf : ∀ x, ε / ‖c‖ ≤ ‖x‖ → ‖x‖ < ε → ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) {x : E} (hx : ‖x‖ ≠ 0) :
‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
(normSeminorm 𝕜 E).bound_of_shell ((normSeminorm 𝕜₂ F).comp ⟨⟨f, map_add f⟩, map_smulₛₗ f⟩)
ε_pos hc hf hx
#align semilinear_map_class.bound_of_shell_semi_normed SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_shell_semi_normed
/-- A continuous linear map between seminormed spaces is bounded when the field is nontrivially
normed. The continuity ensures boundedness on a ball of some radius `ε`. The nontriviality of the
norm is then used to rescale any element into an element of norm in `[ε/C, ε]`, whose image has a
controlled norm. The norm control for the original element follows by rescaling. -/
theorem SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_continuous [SemilinearMapClass 𝓕 σ₁₂ E F] (f : 𝓕)
(hf : Continuous f) : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x : E, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
let φ : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F := ⟨⟨f, map_add f⟩, map_smulₛₗ f⟩
((normSeminorm 𝕜₂ F).comp φ).bound_of_continuous_normedSpace (continuous_norm.comp hf)
#align semilinear_map_class.bound_of_continuous SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_continuous
end
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
theorem bound [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : ∃ C, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x : E, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ :=
SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_continuous f f.2
#align continuous_linear_map.bound ContinuousLinearMap.bound
section
open Filter
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- Given a unit-length element `x` of a normed space `E` over a field `𝕜`, the natural linear
isometry map from `𝕜` to `E` by taking multiples of `x`. -/
def _root_.LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) : 𝕜 →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E :=
{ LinearMap.toSpanSingleton 𝕜 E v with norm_map' := fun x => by simp [norm_smul, hv] }
#align linear_isometry.to_span_singleton LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton
variable {𝕜 E}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton_apply {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) (a : 𝕜) :
LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton 𝕜 E hv a = a • v :=
rfl
#align linear_isometry.to_span_singleton_apply LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.coe_toSpanSingleton {v : E} (hv : ‖v‖ = 1) :
(LinearIsometry.toSpanSingleton 𝕜 E hv).toLinearMap = LinearMap.toSpanSingleton 𝕜 E v :=
rfl
#align linear_isometry.coe_to_span_singleton LinearIsometry.coe_toSpanSingleton
end
section OpNorm
open Set Real
/-- The operator norm of a continuous linear map is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ }
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.has_op_norm ContinuousLinearMap.hasOpNorm
theorem norm_def (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : ‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
rfl
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_def ContinuousLinearMap.norm_def
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
theorem bounds_nonempty [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} :
∃ c, c ∈ { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.bounds_nonempty ContinuousLinearMap.bounds_nonempty
theorem bounds_bddBelow {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} : BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.bounds_bdd_below ContinuousLinearMap.bounds_bddBelow
theorem isLeast_opNorm [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :
IsLeast {c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖} ‖f‖ := by
refine IsClosed.isLeast_csInf ?_ bounds_nonempty bounds_bddBelow
simp only [setOf_and, setOf_forall]
refine isClosed_Ici.inter <| isClosed_iInter fun _ ↦ isClosed_le ?_ ?_ <;> continuity
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias isLeast_op_norm := isLeast_opNorm
/-- If one controls the norm of every `A x`, then one controls the norm of `A`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) :
‖f‖ ≤ M :=
csInf_le bounds_bddBelow ⟨hMp, hM⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_bound ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_bound := opNorm_le_bound
/-- If one controls the norm of every `A x`, `‖x‖ ≠ 0`, then one controls the norm of `A`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound' (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≠ 0 → ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ M :=
opNorm_le_bound f hMp fun x =>
(ne_or_eq ‖x‖ 0).elim (hM x) fun h => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, norm_image_of_norm_zero f f.2 h, le_refl]
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_bound' ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_bound'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_bound' := opNorm_le_bound'
theorem opNorm_le_of_lipschitz {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {K : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : ‖f‖ ≤ K :=
f.opNorm_le_bound K.2 fun x => by
simpa only [dist_zero_right, f.map_zero] using hf.dist_le_mul x 0
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_of_lipschitz ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_of_lipschitz
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_of_lipschitz := opNorm_le_of_lipschitz
theorem opNorm_eq_of_bounds {φ : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {M : ℝ} (M_nonneg : 0 ≤ M)
(h_above : ∀ x, ‖φ x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖) (h_below : ∀ N ≥ 0, (∀ x, ‖φ x‖ ≤ N * ‖x‖) → M ≤ N) :
‖φ‖ = M :=
le_antisymm (φ.opNorm_le_bound M_nonneg h_above)
((le_csInf_iff ContinuousLinearMap.bounds_bddBelow ⟨M, M_nonneg, h_above⟩).mpr
fun N ⟨N_nonneg, hN⟩ => h_below N N_nonneg hN)
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_eq_of_bounds ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_eq_of_bounds
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_eq_of_bounds := opNorm_eq_of_bounds
theorem opNorm_neg (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := by simp only [norm_def, neg_apply, norm_neg]
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_neg ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_neg := opNorm_neg
theorem opNorm_nonneg (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ fun _ ↦ And.left
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_nonneg ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_nonneg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_nonneg := opNorm_nonneg
/-- The norm of the `0` operator is `0`. -/
theorem opNorm_zero : ‖(0 : E →SL[σ₁₂] F)‖ = 0 :=
le_antisymm (opNorm_le_bound _ le_rfl fun _ ↦ by simp) (opNorm_nonneg _)
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_zero ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_zero := opNorm_zero
/-- The norm of the identity is at most `1`. It is in fact `1`, except when the space is trivial
where it is `0`. It means that one can not do better than an inequality in general. -/
theorem norm_id_le : ‖id 𝕜 E‖ ≤ 1 :=
opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun x => by simp
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_id_le ContinuousLinearMap.norm_id_le
section
variable [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃] (f g : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) (h : F →SL[σ₂₃] G)
(x : E)
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm: `‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖`. -/
theorem le_opNorm : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := (isLeast_opNorm f).1.2 x
#align continuous_linear_map.le_op_norm ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_op_norm := le_opNorm
theorem dist_le_opNorm (x y : E) : dist (f x) (f y) ≤ ‖f‖ * dist x y := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm, ← map_sub, f.le_opNorm]
#align continuous_linear_map.dist_le_op_norm ContinuousLinearMap.dist_le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias dist_le_op_norm := dist_le_opNorm
theorem le_of_opNorm_le_of_le {x} {a b : ℝ} (hf : ‖f‖ ≤ a) (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ b) :
‖f x‖ ≤ a * b :=
(f.le_opNorm x).trans <| by gcongr; exact (opNorm_nonneg f).trans hf
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_of_op_norm_le_of_le := le_of_opNorm_le_of_le
theorem le_opNorm_of_le {c : ℝ} {x} (h : ‖x‖ ≤ c) : ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * c :=
f.le_of_opNorm_le_of_le le_rfl h
#align continuous_linear_map.le_op_norm_of_le ContinuousLinearMap.le_opNorm_of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_op_norm_of_le := le_opNorm_of_le
theorem le_of_opNorm_le {c : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ c) (x : E) : ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖x‖ :=
f.le_of_opNorm_le_of_le h le_rfl
#align continuous_linear_map.le_of_op_norm_le ContinuousLinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_of_op_norm_le := le_of_opNorm_le
theorem opNorm_le_iff {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) :
‖f‖ ≤ M ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ M * ‖x‖ :=
⟨f.le_of_opNorm_le, opNorm_le_bound f hMp⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_iff := opNorm_le_iff
theorem ratio_le_opNorm : ‖f x‖ / ‖x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (norm_nonneg _) f.opNorm_nonneg (le_opNorm _ _)
#align continuous_linear_map.ratio_le_op_norm ContinuousLinearMap.ratio_le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias ratio_le_op_norm := ratio_le_opNorm
/-- The image of the unit ball under a continuous linear map is bounded. -/
theorem unit_le_opNorm : ‖x‖ ≤ 1 → ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
mul_one ‖f‖ ▸ f.le_opNorm_of_le
#align continuous_linear_map.unit_le_op_norm ContinuousLinearMap.unit_le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias unit_le_op_norm := unit_le_opNorm
theorem opNorm_le_of_shell {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {ε C : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (hC : 0 ≤ C) {c : 𝕜}
(hc : 1 < ‖c‖) (hf : ∀ x, ε / ‖c‖ ≤ ‖x‖ → ‖x‖ < ε → ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ C :=
f.opNorm_le_bound' hC fun _ hx => SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_shell_semi_normed f ε_pos hc hf hx
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_of_shell ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_of_shell
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_of_shell := opNorm_le_of_shell
theorem opNorm_le_of_ball {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {ε : ℝ} {C : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ ball (0 : E) ε, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ C := by
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine opNorm_le_of_shell ε_pos hC hc fun x _ hx => hf x ?_
rwa [ball_zero_eq]
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_of_ball ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_of_ball
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_of_ball := opNorm_le_of_ball
theorem opNorm_le_of_nhds_zero {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 (0 : E), ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ C :=
let ⟨_, ε0, hε⟩ := Metric.eventually_nhds_iff_ball.1 hf
opNorm_le_of_ball ε0 hC hε
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_of_nhds_zero ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_of_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_of_nhds_zero := opNorm_le_of_nhds_zero
theorem opNorm_le_of_shell' {f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F} {ε C : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (hC : 0 ≤ C) {c : 𝕜}
(hc : ‖c‖ < 1) (hf : ∀ x, ε * ‖c‖ ≤ ‖x‖ → ‖x‖ < ε → ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ C := by
by_cases h0 : c = 0
· refine opNorm_le_of_ball ε_pos hC fun x hx => hf x ?_ ?_
· simp [h0]
· rwa [ball_zero_eq] at hx
· rw [← inv_inv c, norm_inv, inv_lt_one_iff_of_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 <| inv_ne_zero h0)] at hc
refine opNorm_le_of_shell ε_pos hC hc ?_
rwa [norm_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv]
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_le_of_shell' ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_le_of_shell'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_of_shell' := opNorm_le_of_shell'
/-- For a continuous real linear map `f`, if one controls the norm of every `f x`, `‖x‖ = 1`, then
one controls the norm of `f`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm/Basic.lean | 307 | 313 | theorem opNorm_le_of_unit_norm [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {f : E →L[ℝ] F} {C : ℝ}
(hC : 0 ≤ C) (hf : ∀ x, ‖x‖ = 1 → ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f‖ ≤ C := by |
refine opNorm_le_bound' f hC fun x hx => ?_
have H₁ : ‖‖x‖⁻¹ • x‖ = 1 := by rw [norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_norm, inv_mul_cancel hx]
have H₂ := hf _ H₁
rwa [map_smul, norm_smul, norm_inv, norm_norm, ← div_eq_inv_mul, _root_.div_le_iff] at H₂
exact (norm_nonneg x).lt_of_ne' hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Junyan Xu, Jack McKoen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AsSubring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Pointwise
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.valuation.valuation_subring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Valuation subrings of a field
## Projects
The order structure on `ValuationSubring K`.
-/
universe u
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
variable (K : Type u) [Field K]
/-- A valuation subring of a field `K` is a subring `A` such that for every `x : K`,
either `x ∈ A` or `x⁻¹ ∈ A`. -/
structure ValuationSubring extends Subring K where
mem_or_inv_mem' : ∀ x : K, x ∈ carrier ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align valuation_subring ValuationSubring
namespace ValuationSubring
variable {K}
variable (A : ValuationSubring K)
instance : SetLike (ValuationSubring K) K where
coe A := A.toSubring
coe_injective' := by
intro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ h
replace h := SetLike.coe_injective' h
congr
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove that
theorem mem_carrier (x : K) : x ∈ A.carrier ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
#align valuation_subring.mem_carrier ValuationSubring.mem_carrier
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubring (x : K) : x ∈ A.toSubring ↔ x ∈ A := Iff.refl _
#align valuation_subring.mem_to_subring ValuationSubring.mem_toSubring
@[ext]
theorem ext (A B : ValuationSubring K) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B) : A = B := SetLike.ext h
#align valuation_subring.ext ValuationSubring.ext
theorem zero_mem : (0 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.zero_mem
#align valuation_subring.zero_mem ValuationSubring.zero_mem
theorem one_mem : (1 : K) ∈ A := A.toSubring.one_mem
#align valuation_subring.one_mem ValuationSubring.one_mem
theorem add_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x + y ∈ A := A.toSubring.add_mem
#align valuation_subring.add_mem ValuationSubring.add_mem
theorem mul_mem (x y : K) : x ∈ A → y ∈ A → x * y ∈ A := A.toSubring.mul_mem
#align valuation_subring.mul_mem ValuationSubring.mul_mem
theorem neg_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A → -x ∈ A := A.toSubring.neg_mem
#align valuation_subring.neg_mem ValuationSubring.neg_mem
theorem mem_or_inv_mem (x : K) : x ∈ A ∨ x⁻¹ ∈ A := A.mem_or_inv_mem' _
#align valuation_subring.mem_or_inv_mem ValuationSubring.mem_or_inv_mem
instance : SubringClass (ValuationSubring K) K where
zero_mem := zero_mem
add_mem {_} a b := add_mem _ a b
one_mem := one_mem
mul_mem {_} a b := mul_mem _ a b
neg_mem {_} x := neg_mem _ x
theorem toSubring_injective : Function.Injective (toSubring : ValuationSubring K → Subring K) :=
fun x y h => by cases x; cases y; congr
#align valuation_subring.to_subring_injective ValuationSubring.toSubring_injective
instance : CommRing A :=
show CommRing A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : IsDomain A :=
show IsDomain A.toSubring by infer_instance
instance : Top (ValuationSubring K) :=
Top.mk <| { (⊤ : Subring K) with mem_or_inv_mem' := fun _ => Or.inl trivial }
theorem mem_top (x : K) : x ∈ (⊤ : ValuationSubring K) :=
trivial
#align valuation_subring.mem_top ValuationSubring.mem_top
theorem le_top : A ≤ ⊤ := fun _a _ha => mem_top _
#align valuation_subring.le_top ValuationSubring.le_top
instance : OrderTop (ValuationSubring K) where
top := ⊤
le_top := le_top
instance : Inhabited (ValuationSubring K) :=
⟨⊤⟩
instance : ValuationRing A where
cond' a b := by
by_cases h : (b : K) = 0
· use 0
left
ext
simp [h]
by_cases h : (a : K) = 0
· use 0; right
ext
simp [h]
cases' A.mem_or_inv_mem (a / b) with hh hh
· use ⟨a / b, hh⟩
right
ext
field_simp
· rw [show (a / b : K)⁻¹ = b / a by field_simp] at hh
use ⟨b / a, hh⟩;
left
ext
field_simp
instance : Algebra A K :=
show Algebra A.toSubring K by infer_instance
-- Porting note: Somehow it cannot find this instance and I'm too lazy to debug. wrong prio?
instance localRing : LocalRing A := ValuationRing.localRing A
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (a : A) : algebraMap A K a = a := rfl
#align valuation_subring.algebra_map_apply ValuationSubring.algebraMap_apply
instance : IsFractionRing A K where
map_units' := fun ⟨y, hy⟩ =>
(Units.mk0 (y : K) fun c => nonZeroDivisors.ne_zero hy <| Subtype.ext c).isUnit
surj' z := by
by_cases h : z = 0; · use (0, 1); simp [h]
cases' A.mem_or_inv_mem z with hh hh
· use (⟨z, hh⟩, 1); simp
· refine ⟨⟨1, ⟨⟨_, hh⟩, ?_⟩⟩, mul_inv_cancel h⟩
exact mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun c => h (inv_eq_zero.mp (congr_arg Subtype.val c))
exists_of_eq {a b} h := ⟨1, by ext; simpa using h⟩
/-- The value group of the valuation associated to `A`. Note: it is actually a group with zero. -/
def ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.ValueGroup A K
-- deriving LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero
#align valuation_subring.value_group ValuationSubring.ValueGroup
-- Porting note: see https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5020
instance : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero (ValueGroup A) := by
unfold ValueGroup
infer_instance
/-- Any valuation subring of `K` induces a natural valuation on `K`. -/
def valuation : Valuation K A.ValueGroup :=
ValuationRing.valuation A K
#align valuation_subring.valuation ValuationSubring.valuation
instance inhabitedValueGroup : Inhabited A.ValueGroup := ⟨A.valuation 0⟩
#align valuation_subring.inhabited_value_group ValuationSubring.inhabitedValueGroup
theorem valuation_le_one (a : A) : A.valuation a ≤ 1 :=
(ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K _).2 ⟨a, rfl⟩
#align valuation_subring.valuation_le_one ValuationSubring.valuation_le_one
theorem mem_of_valuation_le_one (x : K) (h : A.valuation x ≤ 1) : x ∈ A :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (ValuationRing.mem_integer_iff A K x).1 h
ha ▸ a.2
#align valuation_subring.mem_of_valuation_le_one ValuationSubring.mem_of_valuation_le_one
theorem valuation_le_one_iff (x : K) : A.valuation x ≤ 1 ↔ x ∈ A :=
⟨mem_of_valuation_le_one _ _, fun ha => A.valuation_le_one ⟨x, ha⟩⟩
#align valuation_subring.valuation_le_one_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_le_one_iff
theorem valuation_eq_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x = A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : Aˣ, (a : K) * y = x :=
Quotient.eq''
#align valuation_subring.valuation_eq_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_eq_iff
theorem valuation_le_iff (x y : K) : A.valuation x ≤ A.valuation y ↔ ∃ a : A, (a : K) * y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align valuation_subring.valuation_le_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_le_iff
theorem valuation_surjective : Function.Surjective A.valuation := surjective_quot_mk _
#align valuation_subring.valuation_surjective ValuationSubring.valuation_surjective
theorem valuation_unit (a : Aˣ) : A.valuation a = 1 := by
rw [← A.valuation.map_one, valuation_eq_iff]; use a; simp
#align valuation_subring.valuation_unit ValuationSubring.valuation_unit
theorem valuation_eq_one_iff (a : A) : IsUnit a ↔ A.valuation a = 1 :=
⟨fun h => A.valuation_unit h.unit, fun h => by
have ha : (a : K) ≠ 0 := by
intro c
rw [c, A.valuation.map_zero] at h
exact zero_ne_one h
have ha' : (a : K)⁻¹ ∈ A := by rw [← valuation_le_one_iff, map_inv₀, h, inv_one]
apply isUnit_of_mul_eq_one a ⟨a⁻¹, ha'⟩; ext; field_simp⟩
#align valuation_subring.valuation_eq_one_iff ValuationSubring.valuation_eq_one_iff
theorem valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one (a : A) : A.valuation a < 1 ∨ A.valuation a = 1 :=
lt_or_eq_of_le (A.valuation_le_one a)
#align valuation_subring.valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one ValuationSubring.valuation_lt_one_or_eq_one
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/ValuationSubring.lean | 218 | 221 | theorem valuation_lt_one_iff (a : A) : a ∈ LocalRing.maximalIdeal A ↔ A.valuation a < 1 := by |
rw [LocalRing.mem_maximalIdeal]
dsimp [nonunits]; rw [valuation_eq_one_iff]
exact (A.valuation_le_one a).lt_iff_ne.symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, James Gallicchio
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Count
import Batteries.Data.Fin.Lemmas
/-!
# Pairwise relations on a list
This file provides basic results about `List.Pairwise` and `List.pwFilter` (definitions are in
`Batteries.Data.List.Basic`).
`Pairwise r [a 0, ..., a (n - 1)]` means `∀ i j, i < j → r (a i) (a j)`. For example,
`Pairwise (≠) l` means that all elements of `l` are distinct, and `Pairwise (<) l` means that `l`
is strictly increasing.
`pwFilter r l` is the list obtained by iteratively adding each element of `l` that doesn't break
the pairwiseness of the list we have so far. It thus yields `l'` a maximal sublist of `l` such that
`Pairwise r l'`.
## Tags
sorted, nodup
-/
open Nat Function
namespace List
/-! ### Pairwise -/
theorem rel_of_pairwise_cons (p : (a :: l).Pairwise R) : ∀ {a'}, a' ∈ l → R a a' :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).1 _
theorem Pairwise.of_cons (p : (a :: l).Pairwise R) : Pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).2
theorem Pairwise.tail : ∀ {l : List α} (_p : Pairwise R l), Pairwise R l.tail
| [], h => h
| _ :: _, h => h.of_cons
theorem Pairwise.drop : ∀ {l : List α} {n : Nat}, List.Pairwise R l → List.Pairwise R (l.drop n)
| _, 0, h => h
| [], _ + 1, _ => List.Pairwise.nil
| _ :: _, n + 1, h => Pairwise.drop (n := n) (pairwise_cons.mp h).right
theorem Pairwise.imp_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → R a b → S a b) (p : Pairwise R l) : Pairwise S l := by
induction p with
| nil => constructor
| @cons a l r _ ih =>
constructor
· exact fun x h => H (mem_cons_self ..) (mem_cons_of_mem _ h) <| r x h
· exact ih fun m m' => H (mem_cons_of_mem _ m) (mem_cons_of_mem _ m')
theorem Pairwise.and (hR : Pairwise R l) (hS : Pairwise S l) :
l.Pairwise fun a b => R a b ∧ S a b := by
induction hR with
| nil => simp only [Pairwise.nil]
| cons R1 _ IH =>
simp only [Pairwise.nil, pairwise_cons] at hS ⊢
exact ⟨fun b bl => ⟨R1 b bl, hS.1 b bl⟩, IH hS.2⟩
theorem pairwise_and_iff : l.Pairwise (fun a b => R a b ∧ S a b) ↔ Pairwise R l ∧ Pairwise S l :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.imp fun h => h.1, h.imp fun h => h.2⟩, fun ⟨hR, hS⟩ => hR.and hS⟩
theorem Pairwise.imp₂ (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b → T a b)
(hR : Pairwise R l) (hS : l.Pairwise S) : l.Pairwise T :=
(hR.and hS).imp fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => H _ _ h₁ h₂
theorem Pairwise.iff_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : List α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → (R a b ↔ S a b)) : Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise S l :=
⟨Pairwise.imp_of_mem fun m m' => (H m m').1, Pairwise.imp_of_mem fun m m' => (H m m').2⟩
theorem Pairwise.iff {S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : List α} :
Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise S l :=
Pairwise.iff_of_mem fun _ _ => H ..
theorem pairwise_of_forall {l : List α} (H : ∀ x y, R x y) : Pairwise R l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem Pairwise.and_mem {l : List α} :
Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise (fun x y => x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l :=
Pairwise.iff_of_mem <| by simp (config := { contextual := true })
theorem Pairwise.imp_mem {l : List α} :
Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise (fun x y => x ∈ l → y ∈ l → R x y) l :=
Pairwise.iff_of_mem <| by simp (config := { contextual := true })
theorem Pairwise.forall_of_forall_of_flip (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (h₂ : Pairwise R l)
(h₃ : l.Pairwise (flip R)) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → R x y := by
induction l with
| nil => exact forall_mem_nil _
| cons a l ih =>
rw [pairwise_cons] at h₂ h₃
simp only [mem_cons]
rintro x (rfl | hx) y (rfl | hy)
· exact h₁ _ (l.mem_cons_self _)
· exact h₂.1 _ hy
· exact h₃.1 _ hx
· exact ih (fun x hx => h₁ _ <| mem_cons_of_mem _ hx) h₂.2 h₃.2 hx hy
theorem pairwise_singleton (R) (a : α) : Pairwise R [a] := by simp
theorem pairwise_pair {a b : α} : Pairwise R [a, b] ↔ R a b := by simp
theorem pairwise_append_comm {R : α → α → Prop} (s : ∀ {x y}, R x y → R y x) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Pairwise R (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Pairwise R (l₂ ++ l₁) := by
have (l₁ l₂ : List α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ l₁ → ∀ y : α, y ∈ l₂ → R x y)
(x : α) (xm : x ∈ l₂) (y : α) (ym : y ∈ l₁) : R x y := s (H y ym x xm)
simp only [pairwise_append, and_left_comm]; rw [Iff.intro (this l₁ l₂) (this l₂ l₁)]
theorem pairwise_middle {R : α → α → Prop} (s : ∀ {x y}, R x y → R y x) {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Pairwise R (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) ↔ Pairwise R (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) := by
show Pairwise R (l₁ ++ ([a] ++ l₂)) ↔ Pairwise R ([a] ++ l₁ ++ l₂)
rw [← append_assoc, pairwise_append, @pairwise_append _ _ ([a] ++ l₁), pairwise_append_comm s]
simp only [mem_append, or_comm]
theorem Pairwise.of_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β) (H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b)
(p : Pairwise S (map f l)) : Pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_map.1 p).imp (H _ _)
theorem Pairwise.map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β) (H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b))
(p : Pairwise R l) : Pairwise S (map f l) :=
pairwise_map.2 <| p.imp (H _ _)
theorem pairwise_filterMap (f : β → Option α) {l : List β} :
Pairwise R (filterMap f l) ↔ Pairwise (fun a a' : β => ∀ b ∈ f a, ∀ b' ∈ f a', R b b') l := by
let _S (a a' : β) := ∀ b ∈ f a, ∀ b' ∈ f a', R b b'
simp only [Option.mem_def]
induction l with
| nil => simp only [filterMap, Pairwise.nil]
| cons a l IH => ?_
match e : f a with
| none =>
rw [filterMap_cons_none _ _ e, pairwise_cons]
simp only [e, false_implies, implies_true, true_and, IH]
| some b =>
rw [filterMap_cons_some _ _ _ e]
simpa [IH, e] using fun _ =>
⟨fun h a ha b hab => h _ _ ha hab, fun h a b ha hab => h _ ha _ hab⟩
theorem Pairwise.filter_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → Option β)
(H : ∀ a a' : α, R a a' → ∀ b ∈ f a, ∀ b' ∈ f a', S b b') {l : List α} (p : Pairwise R l) :
Pairwise S (filterMap f l) :=
(pairwise_filterMap _).2 <| p.imp (H _ _)
theorem pairwise_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] {l : List α} :
Pairwise R (filter p l) ↔ Pairwise (fun x y => p x → p y → R x y) l := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter, pairwise_filterMap]
simp
theorem Pairwise.filter (p : α → Bool) : Pairwise R l → Pairwise R (filter p l) :=
Pairwise.sublist (filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_join {L : List (List α)} :
Pairwise R (join L) ↔
(∀ l ∈ L, Pairwise R l) ∧ Pairwise (fun l₁ l₂ => ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₂, R x y) L := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons l L IH =>
simp only [join, pairwise_append, IH, mem_join, exists_imp, and_imp, forall_mem_cons,
pairwise_cons, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
rw [and_comm, and_congr_left_iff]
intros; exact ⟨fun h a b c d e => h c d e a b, fun h c d e a b => h a b c d e⟩
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Pairwise.lean | 168 | 171 | theorem pairwise_bind {R : β → β → Prop} {l : List α} {f : α → List β} :
List.Pairwise R (l.bind f) ↔
(∀ a ∈ l, Pairwise R (f a)) ∧ Pairwise (fun a₁ a₂ => ∀ x ∈ f a₁, ∀ y ∈ f a₂, R x y) l := by |
simp [List.bind, pairwise_join, pairwise_map]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.ChebyshevMarkov
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.CompareExp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.TriangleInequality
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Compact
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# Lp space
This file provides the space `Lp E p μ` as the subtype of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun)
such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. For `1 ≤ p`, `snorm` defines a norm and `Lp` is a complete metric
space.
## Main definitions
* `Lp E p μ` : elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun) such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. Defined
as an `AddSubgroup` of `α →ₘ[μ] E`.
Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `Lp`. We define this action, and prove
that it is continuous. In particular,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLp` defines the action on `Lp` of a continuous linear map.
* `Lp.posPart` is the positive part of an `Lp` function.
* `Lp.negPart` is the negative part of an `Lp` function.
When `α` is a topological space equipped with a finite Borel measure, there is a bounded linear map
from the normed space of bounded continuous functions (`α →ᵇ E`) to `Lp E p μ`. We construct this
as `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp`.
## Notations
* `α →₁[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 1 μ`.
* `α →₂[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 2 μ`.
## Implementation
Since `Lp` is defined as an `AddSubgroup`, dot notation does not work. Use `Lp.Measurable f` to
say that the coercion of `f` to a genuine function is measurable, instead of the non-working
`f.Measurable`.
To prove that two `Lp` elements are equal, it suffices to show that their coercions to functions
coincide almost everywhere (this is registered as an `ext` rule). This can often be done using
`filter_upwards`. For instance, a proof from first principles that `f + (g + h) = (f + g) + h`
could read (in the `Lp` namespace)
```
example (f g h : Lp E p μ) : (f + g) + h = f + (g + h) := by
ext1
filter_upwards [coeFn_add (f + g) h, coeFn_add f g, coeFn_add f (g + h), coeFn_add g h]
with _ ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, add_assoc]
```
The lemma `coeFn_add` states that the coercion of `f + g` coincides almost everywhere with the sum
of the coercions of `f` and `g`. All such lemmas use `coeFn` in their name, to distinguish the
function coercion from the coercion to almost everywhere defined functions.
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory Uniformity
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-!
### Lp space
The space of equivalence classes of measurable functions for which `snorm f p μ < ∞`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem snorm_aeeqFun {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hf) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _)
#align measure_theory.snorm_ae_eq_fun MeasureTheory.snorm_aeeqFun
theorem Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hfp.1) p μ < ∞ := by simp [hfp.2]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top
/-- Lp space -/
def Lp {α} (E : Type*) {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : AddSubgroup (α →ₘ[μ] E) where
carrier := { f | snorm f p μ < ∞ }
zero_mem' := by simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := by
simp [snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add f g),
snorm_add_lt_top ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ ⟨g.aestronglyMeasurable, hg⟩]
neg_mem' {f} hf := by rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_neg f), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp MeasureTheory.Lp
-- Porting note: calling the first argument `α` breaks the `(α := ·)` notation
scoped notation:25 α' " →₁[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 1 μ
scoped notation:25 α' " →₂[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 2 μ
namespace Memℒp
/-- make an element of Lp from a function verifying `Memℒp` -/
def toLp (f : α → E) (h_mem_ℒp : Memℒp f p μ) : Lp E p μ :=
⟨AEEqFun.mk f h_mem_ℒp.1, h_mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp
theorem coeFn_toLp {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.toLp f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Memℒp.coeFn_toLp
theorem toLp_congr {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
hf.toLp f = hg.toLp g := by simp [toLp, hfg]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_congr MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_congr
@[simp]
theorem toLp_eq_toLp_iff {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
hf.toLp f = hg.toLp g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by simp [toLp]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_eq_to_Lp_iff MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_eq_toLp_iff
@[simp]
theorem toLp_zero (h : Memℒp (0 : α → E) p μ) : h.toLp 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_zero MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_zero
theorem toLp_add {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
(hf.add hg).toLp (f + g) = hf.toLp f + hg.toLp g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_add MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_add
theorem toLp_neg {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.neg.toLp (-f) = -hf.toLp f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_neg MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_neg
theorem toLp_sub {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
(hf.sub hg).toLp (f - g) = hf.toLp f - hg.toLp g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_sub MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_sub
end Memℒp
namespace Lp
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (Lp E p μ) (fun _ => α → E) :=
⟨fun f => ((f : α →ₘ[μ] E) : α → E)⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Lp.instCoeFun
@[ext high]
theorem ext {f g : Lp E p μ} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact AEEqFun.ext h
#align measure_theory.Lp.ext MeasureTheory.Lp.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : Lp E p μ} : f = g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h], fun h => ext h⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.ext_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.ext_iff
theorem mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ snorm f p μ < ∞ := Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top
theorem mem_Lp_iff_memℒp {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ := by
simp [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, Memℒp, f.stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_memℒp
protected theorem antitone [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) : Lp E q μ ≤ Lp E p μ :=
fun f hf => (Memℒp.memℒp_of_exponent_le ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ hpq).2
#align measure_theory.Lp.antitone MeasureTheory.Lp.antitone
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α → E) = f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_mk MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α →ₘ[μ] E) = f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_mk MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem toLp_coeFn (f : Lp E p μ) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.toLp f = f := by
cases f
simp [Memℒp.toLp]
#align measure_theory.Lp.to_Lp_coe_fn MeasureTheory.Lp.toLp_coeFn
theorem snorm_lt_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ :=
f.prop
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_lt_top
theorem snorm_ne_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
(snorm_lt_top f).ne
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_ne_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_ne_top
@[measurability]
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (f : Lp E p μ) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
f.val.stronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.Lp.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Lp.stronglyMeasurable
@[measurability]
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (f : Lp E p μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
f.val.aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Lp.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem memℒp (f : Lp E p μ) : Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f, f.prop⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.memℒp
variable (E p μ)
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : Lp E p μ) =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_zero
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_zero
variable {E p μ}
theorem coeFn_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(-f) =ᵐ[μ] -f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_neg _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_neg
theorem coeFn_add (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f + g) =ᵐ[μ] f + g :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_add _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_add MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_add
theorem coeFn_sub (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f - g) =ᵐ[μ] f - g :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_sub _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_sub MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_sub
theorem const_mem_Lp (α) {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
@AEEqFun.const α _ _ μ _ c ∈ Lp E p μ :=
(memℒp_const c).snorm_mk_lt_top
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_const MeasureTheory.Lp.const_mem_Lp
instance instNorm : Norm (Lp E p μ) where norm f := ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ)
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_norm MeasureTheory.Lp.instNorm
-- note: we need this to be defeq to the instance from `SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm`, so
-- can't use `ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ)`
instance instNNNorm : NNNorm (Lp E p μ) where nnnorm f := ⟨‖f‖, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_nnnorm MeasureTheory.Lp.instNNNorm
instance instDist : Dist (Lp E p μ) where dist f g := ‖f - g‖
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_dist MeasureTheory.Lp.instDist
instance instEDist : EDist (Lp E p μ) where edist f g := snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_edist MeasureTheory.Lp.instEDist
theorem norm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_def MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_def
theorem nnnorm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖f‖₊ = ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_def MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_def
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_nnnorm (f : Lp E p μ) : (‖f‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖f‖ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_nnnorm MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_nnnorm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nnnorm_coe_ennreal (f : Lp E p μ) : (‖f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = snorm f p μ :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal <| Lp.snorm_ne_top f
@[simp]
theorem norm_toLp (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : ‖hf.toLp f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ) := by
erw [norm_def, snorm_congr_ae (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp hf)]
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_toLp
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_toLp (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
‖hf.toLp f‖₊ = ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ) :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_toLp f hf
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_toLp
theorem coe_nnnorm_toLp {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : (‖hf.toLp f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = snorm f p μ := by
rw [nnnorm_toLp f hf, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal hf.2.ne]
theorem dist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ).toReal := by
simp_rw [dist, norm_def]
refine congr_arg _ ?_
apply snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_sub _ _)
#align measure_theory.Lp.dist_def MeasureTheory.Lp.dist_def
theorem edist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_def MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_def
protected theorem edist_dist (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = .ofReal (dist f g) := by
rw [edist_def, dist_def, ← snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_sub _ _),
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (snorm_ne_top (f - g))]
protected theorem dist_edist (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (edist f g).toReal :=
MeasureTheory.Lp.dist_def ..
theorem dist_eq_norm (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = ‖f - g‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_toLp_toLp (f g : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
edist (hf.toLp f) (hg.toLp g) = snorm (f - g) p μ := by
rw [edist_def]
exact snorm_congr_ae (hf.coeFn_toLp.sub hg.coeFn_toLp)
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_to_Lp_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_toLp_toLp
@[simp]
theorem edist_toLp_zero (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : edist (hf.toLp f) 0 = snorm f p μ := by
convert edist_toLp_toLp f 0 hf zero_memℒp
simp
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_to_Lp_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_toLp_zero
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_zero : ‖(0 : Lp E p μ)‖₊ = 0 := by
rw [nnnorm_def]
change (snorm (⇑(0 : α →ₘ[μ] E)) p μ).toNNReal = 0
simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : ‖(0 : Lp E p μ)‖ = 0 :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) nnnorm_zero
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_measure_zero (f : Lp E p (0 : MeasureTheory.Measure α)) : ‖f‖ = 0 := by
simp [norm_def]
@[simp] theorem norm_exponent_zero (f : Lp E 0 μ) : ‖f‖ = 0 := by simp [norm_def]
theorem nnnorm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ‖f‖₊ = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf => by simp [hf]⟩
rw [nnnorm_def, ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_zero_iff] at hf
cases hf with
| inl hf =>
rw [snorm_eq_zero_iff (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f) hp.ne.symm] at hf
exact Subtype.eq (AEEqFun.ext (hf.trans AEEqFun.coeFn_zero.symm))
| inr hf =>
exact absurd hf (snorm_ne_top f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_eq_zero_iff
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
NNReal.coe_eq_zero.trans (nnnorm_eq_zero_iff hp)
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero {f : Lp E p μ} : f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← (Lp.memℒp f).toLp_eq_toLp_iff zero_memℒp, Memℒp.toLp_zero, toLp_coeFn]
#align measure_theory.Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖-f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ := by
rw [nnnorm_def, nnnorm_def, snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_neg _), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_neg
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (nnnorm_neg f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_neg
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ≥0} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g‖₊ := by
simp only [nnnorm_def]
have := snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul h p
rwa [← ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toNNReal_mul,
ENNReal.toNNReal_coe] at this
· exact (Lp.memℒp _).snorm_ne_top
· exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (Lp.memℒp _).snorm_ne_top
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ c * ‖g‖ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with hc | hc
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using hc
exact NNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr (nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul h)
· simp only [norm_def]
have := snorm_eq_zero_and_zero_of_ae_le_mul_neg h hc p
simp [this]
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem norm_le_norm_of_ae_le {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
‖f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ := by
rw [norm_def, norm_def, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (snorm_ne_top _) (snorm_ne_top _)]
exact snorm_mono_ae h
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_norm_of_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_norm_of_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ≥0} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_nnnorm_le_mul (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_le_mul (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul
theorem mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_le (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_le {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ≥0)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable _ hfC
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ) (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable _ hfC
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound
theorem nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ≥0}
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * C := by
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· by_cases hp : p.toReal⁻¹ = 0
· simp [hp, hμ, nnnorm_def]
· simp [hμ, nnnorm_def, Real.zero_rpow hp]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_def, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (snorm_ne_top _)]
refine (snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_eq ?_
rw [← coe_measureUnivNNReal μ, ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).ne',
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_comm, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound
theorem norm_le_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f‖ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * C := by
lift C to ℝ≥0 using hC
have := nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound hfC
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_rpow] at this
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound
instance instNormedAddCommGroup [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedAddCommGroup (Lp E p μ) :=
{ AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := (norm : Lp E p μ → ℝ)
map_zero' := norm_zero
neg' := by simp
add_le' := fun f g => by
suffices (‖f + g‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖f‖₊ + ‖g‖₊ from mod_cast this
simp only [Lp.nnnorm_coe_ennreal]
exact (snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add _ _)).trans_le
(snorm_add_le (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _) (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _) hp.out)
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun f =>
(norm_eq_zero_iff <| zero_lt_one.trans_le hp.1).1 } with
edist := edist
edist_dist := Lp.edist_dist }
#align measure_theory.Lp.normed_add_comm_group MeasureTheory.Lp.instNormedAddCommGroup
-- check no diamond is created
example [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : PseudoEMetricSpace.toEDist = (Lp.instEDist : EDist (Lp E p μ)) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
example [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm = (Lp.instNNNorm : NNNorm (Lp E p μ)) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section BoundedSMul
variable {𝕜 𝕜' : Type*}
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜' E]
variable [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' E]
theorem const_smul_mem_Lp (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) ∈ Lp E p μ := by
rw [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_smul _ _)]
refine (snorm_const_smul_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
exact Or.inl ⟨ENNReal.coe_lt_top, f.prop⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_const_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.const_smul_mem_Lp
variable (E p μ 𝕜)
/-- The `𝕜`-submodule of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` whose `Lp` norm is finite. This is `Lp E p μ`,
with extra structure. -/
def LpSubmodule : Submodule 𝕜 (α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
{ Lp E p μ with smul_mem' := fun c f hf => by simpa using const_smul_mem_Lp c ⟨f, hf⟩ }
#align measure_theory.Lp.Lp_submodule MeasureTheory.Lp.LpSubmodule
variable {E p μ 𝕜}
theorem coe_LpSubmodule : (LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜).toAddSubgroup = Lp E p μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_Lp_submodule MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_LpSubmodule
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
{ (LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜).module with }
#align measure_theory.Lp.module MeasureTheory.Lp.instModule
theorem coeFn_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(c • f) =ᵐ[μ] c • ⇑f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_smul
instance instIsCentralScalar [Module 𝕜ᵐᵒᵖ E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜ᵐᵒᵖ E] [IsCentralScalar 𝕜 E] :
IsCentralScalar 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) where
op_smul_eq_smul k f := Subtype.ext <| op_smul_eq_smul k (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
#align measure_theory.Lp.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Lp.instIsCentralScalar
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' E] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' (Lp E p μ) where
smul_comm k k' f := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm k k' (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
#align measure_theory.Lp.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Lp.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul 𝕜 𝕜'] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' E] : IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' (Lp E p μ) where
smul_assoc k k' f := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc k k' (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
instance instBoundedSMul [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : BoundedSMul 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
-- TODO: add `BoundedSMul.of_nnnorm_smul_le`
BoundedSMul.of_norm_smul_le fun r f => by
suffices (‖r • f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖r‖₊ * ‖f‖₊ from mod_cast this
rw [nnnorm_def, nnnorm_def, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _),
snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_smul _ _), ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _)]
exact snorm_const_smul_le r f
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_bounded_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.instBoundedSMul
end BoundedSMul
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
instance instNormedSpace [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedSpace 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) where
norm_smul_le _ _ := norm_smul_le _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.normed_space MeasureTheory.Lp.instNormedSpace
end NormedSpace
end Lp
namespace Memℒp
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem toLp_const_smul {f : α → E} (c : 𝕜) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
(hf.const_smul c).toLp (c • f) = c • hf.toLp f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_const_smul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_const_smul
end Memℒp
/-! ### Indicator of a set as an element of Lᵖ
For a set `s` with `(hs : MeasurableSet s)` and `(hμs : μ s < ∞)`, we build
`indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c`, the element of `Lp` corresponding to `s.indicator (fun _ => c)`.
-/
section Indicator
variable {c : E} {f : α → E} {hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ} {s : Set α}
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_le (s : Set α) (f : α → G) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator f) μ ≤ snormEssSup f μ := by
refine essSup_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
exact Set.indicator_le_self s _ x
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_le
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : G) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator fun _ : α => c) μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ := by
by_cases hμ0 : μ = 0
· rw [hμ0, snormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact zero_le _
· exact (snormEssSup_indicator_le s fun _ => c).trans (snormEssSup_const c hμ0).le
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_const_le
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq (s : Set α) (c : G) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖₊ := by
refine le_antisymm (snormEssSup_indicator_const_le s c) ?_
by_contra! h
have h' := ae_iff.mp (ae_lt_of_essSup_lt h)
push_neg at h'
refine hμs (measure_mono_null (fun x hx_mem => ?_) h')
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.indicator_of_mem hx_mem]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_eq MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq
theorem snorm_indicator_le (f : α → E) : snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ := by
refine snorm_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
suffices ‖s.indicator f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f x‖₊ by exact NNReal.coe_mono this
rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
exact s.indicator_le_self _ x
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_le
theorem snorm_indicator_const₀ {c : G} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
have hp_pos : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top
calc
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ
= (∫⁻ x, ((‖(s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp hp_top
_ = (∫⁻ x, (s.indicator fun _ ↦ (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) x ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
congr 2
refine (Set.comp_indicator_const c (fun x : G ↦ (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) ?_)
simp [hp_pos]
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
mul_one_div_cancel hp_pos.ne', ENNReal.rpow_one]
positivity
theorem snorm_indicator_const {c : G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
snorm_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet hp hp_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const
theorem snorm_indicator_const' {c : G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq s c hμs]
· exact snorm_indicator_const hs hp hp_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const' MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const'
theorem snorm_indicator_const_le (c : G) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_zero, zero_le']
rcases eq_or_ne p ∞ with (rfl | h'p)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_top, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one]
exact snormEssSup_indicator_const_le _ _
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ snorm (t.indicator fun _ => c) p μ :=
snorm_mono (norm_indicator_le_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) _)
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ t ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
(snorm_indicator_const (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) hp h'p)
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by rw [measure_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const_le MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const_le
theorem Memℒp.indicator (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (s.indicator f) p μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.indicator hs, lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_indicator_le f) hf.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.indicator MeasureTheory.Memℒp.indicator
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict {f : α → F} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator f) μ = snormEssSup f (μ.restrict s) := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_indicator,
ENNReal.essSup_indicator_eq_essSup_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_eq_snorm_ess_sup_restrict MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict
theorem snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict {f : α → F} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ = snorm f p (μ.restrict s) := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, snorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top]
exact snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict hs
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_zero hp_top]
suffices (∫⁻ x, (‖s.indicator f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) =
∫⁻ x in s, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ by rw [this]
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ hs]
congr
simp_rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_indicator]
have h_zero : (fun x => x ^ p.toReal) (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_zero hp_top]
-- Porting note: The implicit argument should be specified because the elaborator can't deal with
-- `∘` well.
exact (Set.indicator_comp_of_zero (g := fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ p.toReal) h_zero).symm
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict
theorem memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Memℒp (s.indicator f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s) := by
simp [Memℒp, aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs, snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_indicator_iff_restrict MeasureTheory.memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict
/-- If a function is supported on a finite-measure set and belongs to `ℒ^p`, then it belongs to
`ℒ^q` for any `q ≤ p`. -/
theorem Memℒp.memℒp_of_exponent_le_of_measure_support_ne_top
{p q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfq : Memℒp f q μ) {s : Set α} (hf : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hpq : p ≤ q) : Memℒp f p μ := by
have : (toMeasurable μ s).indicator f = f := by
apply Set.indicator_eq_self.2
apply Function.support_subset_iff'.2 (fun x hx ↦ hf x ?_)
contrapose! hx
exact subset_toMeasurable μ s hx
rw [← this, memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)] at hfq ⊢
have : Fact (μ (toMeasurable μ s) < ∞) := ⟨by simpa [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using hs⟩
exact memℒp_of_exponent_le hfq hpq
theorem memℒp_indicator_const (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : E) (hμsc : c = 0 ∨ μ s ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ := by
rw [memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict hs]
rcases hμsc with rfl | hμ
· exact zero_memℒp
· have := Fact.mk hμ.lt_top
apply memℒp_const
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_indicator_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_indicator_const
/-- The `ℒ^p` norm of the indicator of a set is uniformly small if the set itself has small measure,
for any `p < ∞`. Given here as an existential `∀ ε > 0, ∃ η > 0, ...` to avoid later
management of `ℝ≥0∞`-arithmetic. -/
theorem exists_snorm_indicator_le (hp : p ≠ ∞) (c : E) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | h'p)
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ => by simp⟩
have hp₀ : 0 < p := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 h'p
have hp₀' : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := div_nonneg zero_le_one ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
have hp₀'' : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp₀.ne' hp
obtain ⟨η, hη_pos, hη_le⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * (η : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ε := by
have :
Filter.Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0 => ((‖c‖₊ * x ^ (1 / p.toReal) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞)) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0)) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
convert (NNReal.continuousAt_rpow_const (Or.inr hp₀')).tendsto.const_mul _
simp [hp₀''.ne']
have hε' : 0 < ε := hε.bot_lt
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, hδε'⟩ :=
NNReal.nhds_zero_basis.eventually_iff.mp (eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt hε' this)
obtain ⟨η, hη, hηδ⟩ := exists_between hδ
refine ⟨η, hη, ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp₀', ← ENNReal.coe_mul]
exact hδε' hηδ
refine ⟨η, hη_pos, fun s hs => ?_⟩
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans (le_trans ?_ hη_le)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow hs hp₀') _
#align measure_theory.exists_snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.exists_snorm_indicator_le
protected lemma Memℒp.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {g}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s)) (hg : Memℒp g p (μ.restrict sᶜ)) :
Memℒp (s.piecewise f g) p μ := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.piecewise hs hf.1 hg.1
refine ⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.piecewise hs hf.1 hg.1, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne p ∞ with rfl | hp_top
· rw [snorm_top_piecewise f g hs]
exact max_lt hf.2 hg.2
rw [snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top, ← lintegral_add_compl _ hs,
ENNReal.add_lt_top]
constructor
· have h : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ s →
(‖Set.piecewise s f g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal = (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal := by
filter_upwards with a ha using by simp [ha]
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun hs h]
exact lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top hf.2
· have h : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ sᶜ →
(‖Set.piecewise s f g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal = (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal := by
filter_upwards with a ha
have ha' : a ∉ s := ha
simp [ha']
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun hs.compl h]
exact lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top hg.2
end Indicator
section IndicatorConstLp
open Set Function
variable {s : Set α} {hs : MeasurableSet s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {c : E}
/-- Indicator of a set as an element of `Lp`. -/
def indicatorConstLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) : Lp E p μ :=
Memℒp.toLp (s.indicator fun _ => c) (memℒp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp
/-- A version of `Set.indicator_add` for `MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp`.-/
theorem indicatorConstLp_add {c' : E} :
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c + indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c' =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs (c + c') := by
simp_rw [indicatorConstLp, ← Memℒp.toLp_add, indicator_add]
rfl
/-- A version of `Set.indicator_sub` for `MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp`.-/
theorem indicatorConstLp_sub {c' : E} :
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c - indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c' =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs (c - c') := by
simp_rw [indicatorConstLp, ← Memℒp.toLp_sub, indicator_sub]
rfl
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn : ⇑(indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator fun _ => c :=
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn_mem : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, x ∈ s → indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c x = c :=
indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.trans (Set.indicator_of_mem hxs _)
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_mem MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn_mem
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn_nmem : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, x ∉ s → indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c x = 0 :=
indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.trans (Set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs _)
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_nmem MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn_nmem
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicatorConstLp_coeFn,
snorm_indicator_const hs hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_rpow,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp_top (hμs_ne_zero : μ s ≠ 0) :
‖indicatorConstLp ∞ hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicatorConstLp_coeFn,
snorm_indicator_const' hs hμs_ne_zero ENNReal.top_ne_zero, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero,
ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp_top MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp_top
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp' (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hμs_pos : μ s ≠ 0) :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· rw [hp_top, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero, Real.rpow_zero, mul_one]
exact norm_indicatorConstLp_top hμs_pos
· exact norm_indicatorConstLp hp_pos hp_top
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp' MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp'
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp_le :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [indicatorConstLp, Lp.norm_toLp]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (by positivity) ?_
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans_eq ?_
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_mul (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal,
ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by positivity) hμs
theorem edist_indicatorConstLp_eq_nnnorm {t : Set α} {ht : MeasurableSet t} {hμt : μ t ≠ ∞} :
edist (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) (indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c) =
‖indicatorConstLp p (hs.symmDiff ht) (measure_symmDiff_ne_top hμs hμt) c‖₊ := by
unfold indicatorConstLp
rw [Lp.edist_toLp_toLp, snorm_indicator_sub_indicator, Lp.coe_nnnorm_toLp]
theorem dist_indicatorConstLp_eq_norm {t : Set α} {ht : MeasurableSet t} {hμt : μ t ≠ ∞} :
dist (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) (indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c) =
‖indicatorConstLp p (hs.symmDiff ht) (measure_symmDiff_ne_top hμs hμt) c‖ := by
rw [Lp.dist_edist, edist_indicatorConstLp_eq_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_toReal, Lp.coe_nnnorm]
@[simp]
theorem indicatorConstLp_empty :
indicatorConstLp p MeasurableSet.empty (by simp : μ ∅ ≠ ∞) c = 0 := by
simp only [indicatorConstLp, Set.indicator_empty', Memℒp.toLp_zero]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_empty MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_empty
theorem indicatorConstLp_inj {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0)
(h : indicatorConstLp p hs hsμ c = indicatorConstLp p ht htμ c) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
.of_indicator_const hc <|
calc
s.indicator (fun _ ↦ c) =ᵐ[μ] indicatorConstLp p hs hsμ c := indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm
_ = indicatorConstLp p ht htμ c := by rw [h]
_ =ᵐ[μ] t.indicator (fun _ ↦ c) := indicatorConstLp_coeFn
theorem memℒp_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E} (h : Disjoint (support f) (support g))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
Memℒp (f + g) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ ∧ Memℒp g p μ := by
borelize E
refine ⟨fun hfg => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => h.1.add h.2⟩
· rw [← Set.indicator_add_eq_left h]; exact hfg.indicator (measurableSet_support hf.measurable)
· rw [← Set.indicator_add_eq_right h]; exact hfg.indicator (measurableSet_support hg.measurable)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_add_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.memℒp_add_of_disjoint
/-- The indicator of a disjoint union of two sets is the sum of the indicators of the sets. -/
theorem indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (hst : s ∩ t = ∅) (c : E) :
indicatorConstLp p (hs.union ht) (measure_union_ne_top hμs hμt) c =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c + indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c := by
ext1
refine indicatorConstLp_coeFn.trans (EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm)
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm)
rw [Set.indicator_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst) _]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_disjoint_union MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union
end IndicatorConstLp
section const
variable (μ p)
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E)
/-- Constant function as an element of `MeasureTheory.Lp` for a finite measure. -/
protected def Lp.const : E →+ Lp E p μ where
toFun c := ⟨AEEqFun.const α c, const_mem_Lp α μ c⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
lemma Lp.coeFn_const : Lp.const p μ c =ᵐ[μ] Function.const α c :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_const α c
@[simp] lemma Lp.const_val : (Lp.const p μ c).1 = AEEqFun.const α c := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Memℒp.toLp_const : Memℒp.toLp _ (memℒp_const c) = Lp.const p μ c := rfl
@[simp]
lemma indicatorConstLp_univ :
indicatorConstLp p .univ (measure_ne_top μ _) c = Lp.const p μ c := by
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, indicatorConstLp]
simp only [Set.indicator_univ, Function.const]
theorem Lp.norm_const [NeZero μ] (hp_zero : p ≠ 0) :
‖Lp.const p μ c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
have := NeZero.ne μ
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, Lp.norm_toLp, snorm_const] <;> try assumption
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← ENNReal.toReal_rpow, coe_nnnorm]
theorem Lp.norm_const' (hp_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
‖Lp.const p μ c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, Lp.norm_toLp, snorm_const'] <;> try assumption
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← ENNReal.toReal_rpow, coe_nnnorm]
theorem Lp.norm_const_le : ‖Lp.const p μ c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [← indicatorConstLp_univ]
exact norm_indicatorConstLp_le
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.const` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps] protected def Lp.constₗ (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] :
E →ₗ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
toFun := Lp.const p μ
map_add' := map_add _
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simps! apply]
protected def Lp.constL (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
E →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ :=
(Lp.constₗ p μ 𝕜).mkContinuous ((μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal)) fun _ ↦
(Lp.norm_const_le _ _ _).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
theorem Lp.norm_constL_le (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
‖(Lp.constL p μ 𝕜 : E →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)‖ ≤ (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by positivity) _
end const
theorem Memℒp.norm_rpow_div {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (q : ℝ≥0∞) :
Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal) (p / q) μ := by
refine ⟨(hf.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow_const q.toReal).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
by_cases q_top : q = ∞
· simp [q_top]
by_cases q_zero : q = 0
· simp [q_zero]
by_cases p_zero : p = 0
· simp [p_zero]
rw [ENNReal.div_zero p_zero]
exact (memℒp_top_const (1 : ℝ)).2
rw [snorm_norm_rpow _ (ENNReal.toReal_pos q_zero q_top)]
apply ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal q_top, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel q_zero q_top,
mul_one]
exact hf.2.ne
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm_rpow_div MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm_rpow_div
theorem memℒp_norm_rpow_iff {q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (q_zero : q ≠ 0)
(q_top : q ≠ ∞) : Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal) (p / q) μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.norm_rpow_div q⟩
apply (memℒp_norm_iff hf).1
convert h.norm_rpow_div q⁻¹ using 1
· ext x
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), ← Real.rpow_mul (abs_nonneg _),
ENNReal.toReal_inv, mul_inv_cancel, abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), Real.rpow_one]
simp [ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, not_or, q_zero, q_top]
· rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel q_zero q_top,
mul_one]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_norm_rpow_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_norm_rpow_iff
theorem Memℒp.norm_rpow {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) 1 μ := by
convert hf.norm_rpow_div p
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm_rpow MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm_rpow
theorem AEEqFun.compMeasurePreserving_mem_Lp {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
{μb : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {g : β →ₘ[μb] E} (hg : g ∈ Lp E p μb) {f : α → β}
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf ∈ Lp E p μ := by
rw [Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top] at hg ⊢
rwa [snorm_compMeasurePreserving]
namespace Lp
/-! ### Composition with a measure preserving function -/
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {μb : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {f : α → β}
/-- Composition of an `L^p` function with a measure preserving function is an `L^p` function. -/
def compMeasurePreserving (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →+ Lp E p μ where
toFun g := ⟨g.1.compMeasurePreserving f hf, g.1.compMeasurePreserving_mem_Lp g.2 hf⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := by rintro ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMeasurePreserving_val (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
(compMeasurePreserving f hf g).1 = g.1.compMeasurePreserving f hf :=
rfl
theorem coeFn_compMeasurePreserving (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
compMeasurePreserving f hf g =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
g.1.coeFn_compMeasurePreserving hf
@[simp]
theorem norm_compMeasurePreserving (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
‖compMeasurePreserving f hf g‖ = ‖g‖ :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toReal <| g.1.snorm_compMeasurePreserving hf
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.compMeasurePreserving` as a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def compMeasurePreservingₗ (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →ₗ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
__ := compMeasurePreserving f hf
map_smul' c g := by rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.compMeasurePreserving` as a linear isometry. -/
@[simps!]
def compMeasurePreservingₗᵢ [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →ₗᵢ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
toLinearMap := compMeasurePreservingₗ 𝕜 f hf
norm_map' := (norm_compMeasurePreserving · hf)
end Lp
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
/-!
### Composition on `L^p`
We show that Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `L^p`, and specialize
this to the composition with continuous linear maps, and to the definition of the positive
part of an `L^p` function.
-/
section Composition
variable {g : E → F} {c : ℝ≥0}
theorem LipschitzWith.comp_memℒp {α E F} {K} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(g0 : g 0 = 0) (hL : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ :=
have : ∀ x, ‖g (f x)‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := fun x ↦ by
-- TODO: add `LipschitzWith.nnnorm_sub_le` and `LipschitzWith.nnnorm_le`
simpa [g0] using hg.norm_sub_le (f x) 0
hL.of_le_mul (hg.continuous.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hL.1) (eventually_of_forall this)
#align lipschitz_with.comp_mem_ℒp LipschitzWith.comp_memℒp
theorem MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_comp_antilipschitzWith {α E F} {K'} [MeasurableSpace α]
{μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F}
(hL : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ) (hg : UniformContinuous g) (hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g)
(g0 : g 0 = 0) : Memℒp f p μ := by
have A : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ K' * ‖g (f x)‖ := by
intro x
-- TODO: add `AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm_sub` and `AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm`
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0]
apply hg'.le_mul_dist
have B : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
(hg'.uniformEmbedding hg).embedding.aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff.1 hL.1
exact hL.of_le_mul B (Filter.eventually_of_forall A)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_comp_antilipschitz_with MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_comp_antilipschitzWith
namespace LipschitzWith
theorem memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {α E F} {K K'} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => h.of_comp_antilipschitzWith hg.uniformContinuous hg' g0, fun h => hg.comp_memℒp g0 h⟩
#align lipschitz_with.mem_ℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz LipschitzWith.memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz
/-- When `g` is a Lipschitz function sending `0` to `0` and `f` is in `Lp`, then `g ∘ f` is well
defined as an element of `Lp`. -/
def compLp (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
⟨AEEqFun.comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E), by
suffices ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖AEEqFun.comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) x‖ ≤ c * ‖f x‖ from
Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul this
filter_upwards [AEEqFun.coeFn_comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)] with a ha
simp only [ha]
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0]
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) 0⟩
#align lipschitz_with.comp_Lp LipschitzWith.compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
hg.compLp g0 f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_comp _ hg.continuous _
#align lipschitz_with.coe_fn_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.coeFn_compLp
@[simp]
theorem compLp_zero (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) : hg.compLp g0 (0 : Lp E p μ) = 0 := by
rw [Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero]
apply (coeFn_compLp _ _ _).trans
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_zero E p μ] with _ ha
simp only [ha, g0, Function.comp_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align lipschitz_with.comp_Lp_zero LipschitzWith.compLp_zero
theorem norm_compLp_sub_le (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f f' : Lp E p μ) :
‖hg.compLp g0 f - hg.compLp g0 f'‖ ≤ c * ‖f - f'‖ := by
apply Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
filter_upwards [hg.coeFn_compLp g0 f, hg.coeFn_compLp g0 f',
Lp.coeFn_sub (hg.compLp g0 f) (hg.compLp g0 f'), Lp.coeFn_sub f f'] with a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ← dist_eq_norm, Pi.sub_apply, Function.comp_apply]
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) (f' a)
#align lipschitz_with.norm_comp_Lp_sub_le LipschitzWith.norm_compLp_sub_le
theorem norm_compLp_le (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
‖hg.compLp g0 f‖ ≤ c * ‖f‖ := by simpa using hg.norm_compLp_sub_le g0 f 0
#align lipschitz_with.norm_comp_Lp_le LipschitzWith.norm_compLp_le
theorem lipschitzWith_compLp [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
LipschitzWith c (hg.compLp g0 : Lp E p μ → Lp F p μ) :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun f g => by simp [dist_eq_norm, norm_compLp_sub_le]
#align lipschitz_with.lipschitz_with_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.lipschitzWith_compLp
theorem continuous_compLp [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
Continuous (hg.compLp g0 : Lp E p μ → Lp F p μ) :=
(lipschitzWith_compLp hg g0).continuous
#align lipschitz_with.continuous_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.continuous_compLp
end LipschitzWith
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- Composing `f : Lp` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def compLp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
L.lipschitz.compLp (map_zero L) f
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (L.compLp f) a = L (f a) :=
LipschitzWith.coeFn_compLp _ _ _
#align continuous_linear_map.coe_fn_comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.coeFn_compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp' (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : L.compLp f =ᵐ[μ] fun a => L (f a) :=
L.coeFn_compLp f
#align continuous_linear_map.coe_fn_comp_Lp' ContinuousLinearMap.coeFn_compLp'
theorem comp_memℒp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : Memℒp (L ∘ f) p μ :=
(Lp.memℒp (L.compLp f)).ae_eq (L.coeFn_compLp' f)
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_mem_ℒp ContinuousLinearMap.comp_memℒp
theorem comp_memℒp' (L : E →L[𝕜] F) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (L ∘ f) p μ :=
(L.comp_memℒp (hf.toLp f)).ae_eq (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.coeFn_toLp _)
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_mem_ℒp' ContinuousLinearMap.comp_memℒp'
section RCLike
variable {K : Type*} [RCLike K]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => (f x : K)) p μ :=
(@RCLike.ofRealCLM K _).comp_memℒp' hf
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_real MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.memℒp_re_im_iff {f : α → K} :
Memℒp (fun x ↦ RCLike.re (f x)) p μ ∧ Memℒp (fun x ↦ RCLike.im (f x)) p μ ↔
Memℒp f p μ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hf => ⟨hf.re, hf.im⟩⟩
rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
convert MeasureTheory.Memℒp.add (E := K) hre.ofReal (him.ofReal.const_mul RCLike.I)
ext1 x
rw [Pi.add_apply, mul_comm, RCLike.re_add_im]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_re_im_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_re_im_iff
end RCLike
theorem add_compLp (L L' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) :
(L + L').compLp f = L.compLp f + L'.compLp f := by
ext1
refine (coeFn_compLp' (L + L') f).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (EventuallyEq.add (L.coeFn_compLp' f).symm (L'.coeFn_compLp' f).symm)
filter_upwards with x
rw [coe_add', Pi.add_def]
#align continuous_linear_map.add_comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.add_compLp
theorem smul_compLp {𝕜'} [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜' F] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' F]
(c : 𝕜') (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : (c • L).compLp f = c • L.compLp f := by
ext1
refine (coeFn_compLp' (c • L) f).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
refine (L.coeFn_compLp' f).mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.smul_apply, hx, coe_smul', Pi.smul_def]
#align continuous_linear_map.smul_comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.smul_compLp
theorem norm_compLp_le (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖L.compLp f‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f‖ :=
LipschitzWith.norm_compLp_le _ _ _
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_comp_Lp_le ContinuousLinearMap.norm_compLp_le
variable (μ p)
/-- Composing `f : Lp E p μ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`, seen as a `𝕜`-linear map on `Lp E p μ`. -/
def compLpₗ (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : Lp E p μ →ₗ[𝕜] Lp F p μ where
toFun f := L.compLp f
map_add' f g := by
ext1
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_add f g, coeFn_compLp L (f + g), coeFn_compLp L f,
coeFn_compLp L g, Lp.coeFn_add (L.compLp f) (L.compLp g)]
intro a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4 ha5
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ha5, map_add, Pi.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
dsimp
ext1
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_smul c f, coeFn_compLp L (c • f), Lp.coeFn_smul c (L.compLp f),
coeFn_compLp L f] with _ ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, map_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_Lpₗ ContinuousLinearMap.compLpₗ
/-- Composing `f : Lp E p μ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`, seen as a continuous `𝕜`-linear map on
`Lp E p μ`. See also the similar
* `LinearMap.compLeft` for functions,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLeftContinuous` for continuous functions,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLeftContinuousBounded` for bounded continuous functions,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLeftContinuousCompact` for continuous functions on compact spaces.
-/
def compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : Lp E p μ →L[𝕜] Lp F p μ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous (L.compLpₗ p μ) ‖L‖ L.norm_compLp_le
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.compLpL
variable {μ p}
theorem coeFn_compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) :
L.compLpL p μ f =ᵐ[μ] fun a => L (f a) :=
L.coeFn_compLp f
#align continuous_linear_map.coe_fn_comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.coeFn_compLpL
theorem add_compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L L' : E →L[𝕜] F) :
(L + L').compLpL p μ = L.compLpL p μ + L'.compLpL p μ := by ext1 f; exact add_compLp L L' f
#align continuous_linear_map.add_comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.add_compLpL
theorem smul_compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] {𝕜'} [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜' F] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' F]
[SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' F] (c : 𝕜') (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : (c • L).compLpL p μ = c • L.compLpL p μ := by
ext1 f; exact smul_compLp c L f
#align continuous_linear_map.smul_comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.smul_compLpL
theorem norm_compLpL_le [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖L.compLpL p μ‖ ≤ ‖L‖ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_compLpL_le ContinuousLinearMap.norm_compLpL_le
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace MeasureTheory
theorem indicatorConstLp_eq_toSpanSingleton_compLp {s : Set α} [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : F) :
indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x =
(ContinuousLinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℝ x).compLp (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ)) := by
ext1
refine indicatorConstLp_coeFn.trans ?_
have h_compLp :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLp (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ))
rw [← EventuallyEq] at h_compLp
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ h_compLp.symm
refine (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 2 μ _ s hs hμs (1 : ℝ)).mono fun y hy => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hy]
simp_rw [ContinuousLinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply]
by_cases hy_mem : y ∈ s <;> simp [hy_mem, ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul_apply]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_eq_to_span_singleton_comp_Lp MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_eq_toSpanSingleton_compLp
namespace Lp
section PosPart
theorem lipschitzWith_pos_part : LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ℝ => max x 0 :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by simp [Real.dist_eq, abs_max_sub_max_le_abs]
#align measure_theory.Lp.lipschitz_with_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.lipschitzWith_pos_part
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.pos_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => max (f x) 0) p μ :=
lipschitzWith_pos_part.comp_memℒp (max_eq_right le_rfl) hf
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.pos_part MeasureTheory.Memℒp.pos_part
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => max (-f x) 0) p μ :=
lipschitzWith_pos_part.comp_memℒp (max_eq_right le_rfl) hf.neg
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.neg_part MeasureTheory.Memℒp.neg_part
/-- Positive part of a function in `L^p`. -/
def posPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : Lp ℝ p μ :=
lipschitzWith_pos_part.compLp (max_eq_right le_rfl) f
#align measure_theory.Lp.pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.posPart
/-- Negative part of a function in `L^p`. -/
def negPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : Lp ℝ p μ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.neg_part MeasureTheory.Lp.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : (posPart f : α →ₘ[μ] ℝ) = (f : α →ₘ[μ] ℝ).posPart :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_posPart
theorem coeFn_posPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ⇑(posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] fun a => max (f a) 0 :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_posPart _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_posPart
theorem coeFn_negPart_eq_max (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, negPart f a = max (-f a) 0 := by
rw [negPart]
filter_upwards [coeFn_posPart (-f), coeFn_neg f] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, Pi.neg_apply]
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg_part_eq_max MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_negPart_eq_max
theorem coeFn_negPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, negPart f a = -min (f a) 0 :=
(coeFn_negPart_eq_max f).mono fun a h => by rw [h, ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg_part MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_negPart
theorem continuous_posPart [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : Continuous fun f : Lp ℝ p μ => posPart f :=
LipschitzWith.continuous_compLp _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.continuous_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.continuous_posPart
theorem continuous_negPart [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : Continuous fun f : Lp ℝ p μ => negPart f := by
unfold negPart
exact continuous_posPart.comp continuous_neg
#align measure_theory.Lp.continuous_neg_part MeasureTheory.Lp.continuous_negPart
end PosPart
end Lp
end MeasureTheory
end Composition
/-!
## `L^p` is a complete space
We show that `L^p` is a complete space for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section CompleteSpace
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Lp
theorem snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf {ι} [Nonempty ι] [LinearOrder ι] {f : ι → α → G} {p : ℝ}
(hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) {f_lim : α → G}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm' f_lim p μ = (∫⁻ a, atTop.liminf fun m => (‖f m a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
suffices h_no_pow :
(∫⁻ a, (‖f_lim a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a, atTop.liminf fun m => (‖f m a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ by
rw [snorm', h_no_pow]
refine lintegral_congr_ae (h_lim.mono fun a ha => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Tendsto.liminf_eq]
simp_rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp_nonneg, ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
refine ((NNReal.continuous_rpow_const hp_nonneg).tendsto ‖f_lim a‖₊).comp ?_
exact (continuous_nnnorm.tendsto (f_lim a)).comp ha
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf
theorem snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℕ → α → E} {p : ℝ}
(hp_pos : 0 < p) (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) {f_lim : α → E}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm' f_lim p μ ≤ atTop.liminf fun n => snorm' (f n) p μ := by
rw [snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf hp_pos.le h_lim]
rw [← ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div]
refine (lintegral_liminf_le' fun m => (hf m).ennnorm.pow_const _).trans_eq ?_
have h_pow_liminf :
(atTop.liminf fun n => snorm' (f n) p μ) ^ p = atTop.liminf fun n => snorm' (f n) p μ ^ p := by
have h_rpow_mono := ENNReal.strictMono_rpow_of_pos hp_pos
have h_rpow_surj := (ENNReal.rpow_left_bijective hp_pos.ne.symm).2
refine (h_rpow_mono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ h_rpow_surj).liminf_apply ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
all_goals isBoundedDefault
rw [h_pow_liminf]
simp_rw [snorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel hp_pos.ne.symm, ENNReal.rpow_one]
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm'
theorem snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_essSup_liminf {ι} [Nonempty ι] [LinearOrder ι] {f : ι → α → G}
{f_lim : α → G} (h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim ∞ μ = essSup (fun x => atTop.liminf fun m => (‖f m x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ := by
rw [snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup]
refine essSup_congr_ae (h_lim.mono fun x hx => ?_)
dsimp only
apply (Tendsto.liminf_eq ..).symm
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact (continuous_nnnorm.tendsto (f_lim x)).comp hx
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_ess_sup_liminf MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_essSup_liminf
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSpace.lean | 1,380 | 1,386 | theorem snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top {ι} [Nonempty ι] [Countable ι]
[LinearOrder ι] {f : ι → α → F} {f_lim : α → F}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim ∞ μ ≤ atTop.liminf fun n => snorm (f n) ∞ μ := by |
rw [snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_essSup_liminf h_lim]
simp_rw [snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup]
exact ENNReal.essSup_liminf_le fun n => fun x => (‖f n x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ENat
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Projection from cardinal numbers to natural numbers
In this file we define `Cardinal.toNat` to be the natural projection `Cardinal → ℕ`,
sending all infinite cardinals to zero.
We also prove basic lemmas about this definition.
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Cardinal
variable {α : Type u} {c d : Cardinal.{u}}
/-- This function sends finite cardinals to the corresponding natural, and infinite cardinals
to 0. -/
noncomputable def toNat : Cardinal →*₀ ℕ :=
ENat.toNat.comp toENat
#align cardinal.to_nat Cardinal.toNat
#align cardinal.to_nat_hom Cardinal.toNat
@[simp] lemma toNat_toENat (a : Cardinal) : ENat.toNat (toENat a) = toNat a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toNat_ofENat (n : ℕ∞) : toNat n = ENat.toNat n :=
congr_arg ENat.toNat <| toENat_ofENat n
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem toNat_natCast (n : ℕ) : toNat n = n := toNat_ofENat n
@[simp]
lemma toNat_eq_zero : toNat c = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
rw [← toNat_toENat, ENat.toNat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_zero, toENat_eq_top]
lemma toNat_ne_zero : toNat c ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := by simp [not_or]
@[simp] lemma toNat_pos : 0 < toNat c ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ c < ℵ₀ := pos_iff_ne_zero.trans toNat_ne_zero
theorem cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ↑(toNat c) = c := by
lift c to ℕ using h
rw [toNat_natCast]
#align cardinal.cast_to_nat_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0
theorem toNat_apply_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) :
toNat c = Classical.choose (lt_aleph0.1 h) :=
Nat.cast_injective <| by rw [cast_toNat_of_lt_aleph0 h, ← Classical.choose_spec (lt_aleph0.1 h)]
#align cardinal.to_nat_apply_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_apply_of_lt_aleph0
theorem toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : toNat c = 0 := by simp [h]
#align cardinal.to_nat_apply_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le
theorem cast_toNat_of_aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : ↑(toNat c) = (0 : Cardinal) := by
rw [toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le h, Nat.cast_zero]
#align cardinal.cast_to_nat_of_aleph_0_le Cardinal.cast_toNat_of_aleph0_le
theorem toNat_strictMonoOn : StrictMonoOn toNat (Iio ℵ₀) := by
simp only [← range_natCast, StrictMonoOn, forall_mem_range, toNat_natCast, Nat.cast_lt]
exact fun _ _ ↦ id
theorem toNat_monotoneOn : MonotoneOn toNat (Iio ℵ₀) := toNat_strictMonoOn.monotoneOn
theorem toNat_injOn : InjOn toNat (Iio ℵ₀) := toNat_strictMonoOn.injOn
/-- Two finite cardinals are equal
iff they are equal their `Cardinal.toNat` projections are equal. -/
theorem toNat_eq_iff_eq_of_lt_aleph0 (hc : c < ℵ₀) (hd : d < ℵ₀) :
toNat c = toNat d ↔ c = d :=
toNat_injOn.eq_iff hc hd
#align cardinal.to_nat_eq_iff_eq_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_eq_iff_eq_of_lt_aleph0
theorem toNat_le_iff_le_of_lt_aleph0 (hc : c < ℵ₀) (hd : d < ℵ₀) :
toNat c ≤ toNat d ↔ c ≤ d :=
toNat_strictMonoOn.le_iff_le hc hd
#align cardinal.to_nat_le_iff_le_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_le_iff_le_of_lt_aleph0
theorem toNat_lt_iff_lt_of_lt_aleph0 (hc : c < ℵ₀) (hd : d < ℵ₀) :
toNat c < toNat d ↔ c < d :=
toNat_strictMonoOn.lt_iff_lt hc hd
#align cardinal.to_nat_lt_iff_lt_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_lt_iff_lt_of_lt_aleph0
@[gcongr]
theorem toNat_le_toNat (hcd : c ≤ d) (hd : d < ℵ₀) : toNat c ≤ toNat d :=
toNat_monotoneOn (hcd.trans_lt hd) hd hcd
#align cardinal.to_nat_le_of_le_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_le_toNat
@[deprecated toNat_le_toNat (since := "2024-02-15")]
theorem toNat_le_of_le_of_lt_aleph0 (hd : d < ℵ₀) (hcd : c ≤ d) :
toNat c ≤ toNat d :=
toNat_le_toNat hcd hd
theorem toNat_lt_toNat (hcd : c < d) (hd : d < ℵ₀) : toNat c < toNat d :=
toNat_strictMonoOn (hcd.trans hd) hd hcd
#align cardinal.to_nat_lt_of_lt_of_lt_aleph_0 Cardinal.toNat_lt_toNat
@[deprecated toNat_lt_toNat (since := "2024-02-15")]
theorem toNat_lt_of_lt_of_lt_aleph0 (hd : d < ℵ₀) (hcd : c < d) : toNat c < toNat d :=
toNat_lt_toNat hcd hd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-15")] alias toNat_cast := toNat_natCast
#align cardinal.to_nat_cast Cardinal.toNat_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem toNat_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Cardinal.toNat (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
toNat_natCast n
/-- `toNat` has a right-inverse: coercion. -/
theorem toNat_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) toNat :=
toNat_natCast
#align cardinal.to_nat_right_inverse Cardinal.toNat_rightInverse
theorem toNat_surjective : Surjective toNat :=
toNat_rightInverse.surjective
#align cardinal.to_nat_surjective Cardinal.toNat_surjective
@[simp]
theorem mk_toNat_of_infinite [h : Infinite α] : toNat #α = 0 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_to_nat_of_infinite Cardinal.mk_toNat_of_infinite
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_toNat : toNat ℵ₀ = 0 :=
toNat_apply_of_aleph0_le le_rfl
#align cardinal.aleph_0_to_nat Cardinal.aleph0_toNat
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/ToNat.lean | 134 | 134 | theorem mk_toNat_eq_card [Fintype α] : toNat #α = Fintype.card α := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
#align real.le_rpow_add Real.le_rpow_add
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
#align real.rpow_sum_of_pos Real.rpow_sum_of_pos
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
#align real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg Real.rpow_sum_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
#align real.rpow_neg Real.rpow_neg
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub Real.rpow_sub
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align real.rpow_sub' Real.rpow_sub'
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
#align complex.of_real_cpow Complex.ofReal_cpow
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, abs.map_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg,
arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx), ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
#align complex.of_real_cpow_of_nonpos Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(abs x ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [abs.pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = (abs x) ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = (abs x) ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem abs_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, abs_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (abs.pos hz)]
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero Complex.abs_cpow_of_ne_zero
theorem abs_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
abs (z ^ w) = abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact abs_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [map_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, map_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
#align complex.abs_cpow_of_imp Complex.abs_cpow_of_imp
theorem abs_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : abs (z ^ w) ≤ abs z ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (abs_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align complex.abs_cpow_le Complex.abs_cpow_le
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 329 | 330 | theorem abs_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : abs (x ^ (y : ℂ)) = Complex.abs x ^ y := by |
rw [abs_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import order.filter.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d4f691b9e5f94cfc64639973f3544c95f8d5d494"
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
## Main definitions
* `Filter` : filters on a set;
* `Filter.principal` : filter of all sets containing a given set;
* `Filter.map`, `Filter.comap` : operations on filters;
* `Filter.Tendsto` : limit with respect to filters;
* `Filter.Eventually` : `f.eventually p` means `{x | p x} ∈ f`;
* `Filter.Frequently` : `f.frequently p` means `{x | ¬p x} ∉ f`;
* `filter_upwards [h₁, ..., hₙ]` :
a tactic that takes a list of proofs `hᵢ : sᵢ ∈ f`,
and replaces a goal `s ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ s₁ → ... → x ∈ sₙ → x ∈ s`;
* `Filter.NeBot f` : a utility class stating that `f` is a non-trivial filter.
Filters on a type `X` are sets of sets of `X` satisfying three conditions. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
In this file, we define the type `Filter X` of filters on `X`, and endow it with a complete lattice
structure. This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The general notion of limit of a map with respect to filters on the source and target types
is `Filter.Tendsto`. It is defined in terms of the order and the push-forward operation.
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
For instance, anticipating on Topology.Basic, the statement: "if a sequence `u` converges to
some `x` and `u n` belongs to a set `M` for `n` large enough then `x` is in the closure of
`M`" is formalized as: `Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) → (∀ᶠ n in atTop, u n ∈ M) → x ∈ closure M`,
which is a special case of `mem_closure_of_tendsto` from Topology.Basic.
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set Order
open scoped Classical
universe u v w x y
/-- A filter `F` on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. We do not forbid this collection to be
all sets of `α`. -/
structure Filter (α : Type*) where
/-- The set of sets that belong to the filter. -/
sets : Set (Set α)
/-- The set `Set.univ` belongs to any filter. -/
univ_sets : Set.univ ∈ sets
/-- If a set belongs to a filter, then its superset belongs to the filter as well. -/
sets_of_superset {x y} : x ∈ sets → x ⊆ y → y ∈ sets
/-- If two sets belong to a filter, then their intersection belongs to the filter as well. -/
inter_sets {x y} : x ∈ sets → y ∈ sets → x ∩ y ∈ sets
#align filter Filter
/-- If `F` is a filter on `α`, and `U` a subset of `α` then we can write `U ∈ F` as on paper. -/
instance {α : Type*} : Membership (Set α) (Filter α) :=
⟨fun U F => U ∈ F.sets⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_mk {t : Set (Set α)} {h₁ h₂ h₃} : s ∈ mk t h₁ h₂ h₃ ↔ s ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_mk Filter.mem_mk
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_sets : s ∈ f.sets ↔ s ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sets Filter.mem_sets
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
#align filter.inhabited_mem Filter.inhabitedMem
theorem filter_eq : ∀ {f g : Filter α}, f.sets = g.sets → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align filter.filter_eq Filter.filter_eq
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
#align filter.filter_eq_iff Filter.filter_eq_iff
protected theorem ext_iff : f = g ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g := by
simp only [filter_eq_iff, ext_iff, Filter.mem_sets]
#align filter.ext_iff Filter.ext_iff
@[ext]
protected theorem ext : (∀ s, s ∈ f ↔ s ∈ g) → f = g :=
Filter.ext_iff.2
#align filter.ext Filter.ext
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
#align filter.coext Filter.coext
@[simp]
theorem univ_mem : univ ∈ f :=
f.univ_sets
#align filter.univ_mem Filter.univ_mem
theorem mem_of_superset {x y : Set α} (hx : x ∈ f) (hxy : x ⊆ y) : y ∈ f :=
f.sets_of_superset hx hxy
#align filter.mem_of_superset Filter.mem_of_superset
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
theorem inter_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : s ∩ t ∈ f :=
f.inter_sets hs ht
#align filter.inter_mem Filter.inter_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_iff Filter.inter_mem_iff
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
#align filter.diff_mem Filter.diff_mem
theorem univ_mem' (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s) : s ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset univ_mem fun x _ => h x
#align filter.univ_mem' Filter.univ_mem'
theorem mp_mem (hs : s ∈ f) (h : { x | x ∈ s → x ∈ t } ∈ f) : t ∈ f :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem hs h) fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ h₁
#align filter.mp_mem Filter.mp_mem
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
#align filter.congr_sets Filter.congr_sets
/-- Override `sets` field of a filter to provide better definitional equality. -/
protected def copy (f : Filter α) (S : Set (Set α)) (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : Filter α where
sets := S
univ_sets := (hmem _).2 univ_mem
sets_of_superset h hsub := (hmem _).2 <| mem_of_superset ((hmem _).1 h) hsub
inter_sets h₁ h₂ := (hmem _).2 <| inter_mem ((hmem _).1 h₁) ((hmem _).1 h₂)
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
@[simp] lemma mem_copy {S hmem} : s ∈ f.copy S hmem ↔ s ∈ S := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem biInter_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Finite) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
Finite.induction_on hf (by simp) fun _ _ hs => by simp [hs]
#align filter.bInter_mem Filter.biInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem biInter_finset_mem {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} (is : Finset β) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f :=
biInter_mem is.finite_toSet
#align filter.bInter_finset_mem Filter.biInter_finset_mem
alias _root_.Finset.iInter_mem_sets := biInter_finset_mem
#align finset.Inter_mem_sets Finset.iInter_mem_sets
-- attribute [protected] Finset.iInter_mem_sets porting note: doesn't work
@[simp]
theorem sInter_mem {s : Set (Set α)} (hfin : s.Finite) : ⋂₀ s ∈ f ↔ ∀ U ∈ s, U ∈ f := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem hfin]
#align filter.sInter_mem Filter.sInter_mem
@[simp]
theorem iInter_mem {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Finite β] : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f :=
(sInter_mem (finite_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align filter.Inter_mem Filter.iInter_mem
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_subset_iff Filter.exists_mem_subset_iff
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
#align filter.monotone_mem Filter.monotone_mem
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
#align filter.exists_mem_and_iff Filter.exists_mem_and_iff
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
#align filter.forall_in_swap Filter.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Mathlib.Tactic
open Lean Meta Elab Tactic
/--
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ]` replaces a goal of the form `s ∈ f` and terms
`h₁ : t₁ ∈ f, ⋯, hₙ : tₙ ∈ f` with `∀ x, x ∈ t₁ → ⋯ → x ∈ tₙ → x ∈ s`.
The list is an optional parameter, `[]` being its default value.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ], intros a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ }`.
`filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] using e` is a short form for
`{ filter_upwards [h1, ⋯, hn], exact e }`.
Combining both shortcuts is done by writing `filter_upwards [h₁, ⋯, hₙ] with a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₖ using e`.
Note that in this case, the `aᵢ` terms can be used in `e`.
-/
syntax (name := filterUpwards) "filter_upwards" (" [" term,* "]")?
(" with" (ppSpace colGt term:max)*)? (" using " term)? : tactic
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| filter_upwards $[[$[$args],*]]? $[with $wth*]? $[using $usingArg]?) => do
let config : ApplyConfig := {newGoals := ApplyNewGoals.nonDependentOnly}
for e in args.getD #[] |>.reverse do
let goal ← getMainGoal
replaceMainGoal <| ← goal.withContext <| runTermElab do
let m ← mkFreshExprMVar none
let lem ← Term.elabTermEnsuringType
(← ``(Filter.mp_mem $e $(← Term.exprToSyntax m))) (← goal.getType)
goal.assign lem
return [m.mvarId!]
liftMetaTactic fun goal => do
goal.apply (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels ``Filter.univ_mem') config
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| dsimp (config := {zeta := false}) only [Set.mem_setOf_eq])
if let some l := wth then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| intro $[$l]*)
if let some e := usingArg then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic| exact $e)
end Mathlib.Tactic
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
section Principal
/-- The principal filter of `s` is the collection of all supersets of `s`. -/
def principal (s : Set α) : Filter α where
sets := { t | s ⊆ t }
univ_sets := subset_univ s
sets_of_superset hx := Subset.trans hx
inter_sets := subset_inter
#align filter.principal Filter.principal
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "𝓟" => Filter.principal
@[simp] theorem mem_principal {s t : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓟 t ↔ t ⊆ s := Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal Filter.mem_principal
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
#align filter.mem_principal_self Filter.mem_principal_self
end Principal
open Filter
section Join
/-- The join of a filter of filters is defined by the relation `s ∈ join f ↔ {t | s ∈ t} ∈ f`. -/
def join (f : Filter (Filter α)) : Filter α where
sets := { s | { t : Filter α | s ∈ t } ∈ f }
univ_sets := by simp only [mem_setOf_eq, univ_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, setOf_true]
sets_of_superset hx xy := mem_of_superset hx fun f h => mem_of_superset h xy
inter_sets hx hy := mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx hy) fun f ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => inter_mem h₁ h₂
#align filter.join Filter.join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {s : Set α} {f : Filter (Filter α)} : s ∈ join f ↔ { t | s ∈ t } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_join Filter.mem_join
end Join
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance : PartialOrder (Filter α) where
le f g := ∀ ⦃U : Set α⦄, U ∈ g → U ∈ f
le_antisymm a b h₁ h₂ := filter_eq <| Subset.antisymm h₂ h₁
le_refl a := Subset.rfl
le_trans a b c h₁ h₂ := Subset.trans h₂ h₁
theorem le_def : f ≤ g ↔ ∀ x ∈ g, x ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.le_def Filter.le_def
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align filter.not_le Filter.not_le
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
#align filter.generate_sets Filter.GenerateSets
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
#align filter.generate Filter.generate
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
#align filter.sets_iff_generate Filter.le_generate_iff
theorem mem_generate_iff {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} :
U ∈ generate s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, Set.Finite t ∧ ⋂₀ t ⊆ U := by
constructor <;> intro h
· induction h with
| @basic V V_in =>
exact ⟨{V}, singleton_subset_iff.2 V_in, finite_singleton _, (sInter_singleton _).subset⟩
| univ => exact ⟨∅, empty_subset _, finite_empty, subset_univ _⟩
| superset _ hVW hV =>
rcases hV with ⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩
exact ⟨t, hts, ht, htV.trans hVW⟩
| inter _ _ hV hW =>
rcases hV, hW with ⟨⟨t, hts, ht, htV⟩, u, hus, hu, huW⟩
exact
⟨t ∪ u, union_subset hts hus, ht.union hu,
(sInter_union _ _).subset.trans <| inter_subset_inter htV huW⟩
· rcases h with ⟨t, hts, tfin, h⟩
exact mem_of_superset ((sInter_mem tfin).2 fun V hV => GenerateSets.basic <| hts hV) h
#align filter.mem_generate_iff Filter.mem_generate_iff
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
#align filter.mk_of_closure Filter.mkOfClosure
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
#align filter.mk_of_closure_sets Filter.mkOfClosure_sets
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
#align filter.gi_generate Filter.giGenerate
/-- The infimum of filters is the filter generated by intersections
of elements of the two filters. -/
instance : Inf (Filter α) :=
⟨fun f g : Filter α =>
{ sets := { s | ∃ a ∈ f, ∃ b ∈ g, s = a ∩ b }
univ_sets := ⟨_, univ_mem, _, univ_mem, by simp⟩
sets_of_superset := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ xy
refine
⟨a ∪ y, mem_of_superset ha subset_union_left, b ∪ y,
mem_of_superset hb subset_union_left, ?_⟩
rw [← inter_union_distrib_right, union_eq_self_of_subset_left xy]
inter_sets := by
rintro x y ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩ ⟨c, hc, d, hd, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a ∩ c, inter_mem ha hc, b ∩ d, inter_mem hb hd, ?_⟩
ac_rfl }⟩
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_inf_iff Filter.mem_inf_iff
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_left Filter.mem_inf_of_left
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_of_right Filter.mem_inf_of_right
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align filter.inter_mem_inf Filter.inter_mem_inf
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
#align filter.mem_inf_of_inter Filter.mem_inf_of_inter
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
#align filter.mem_inf_iff_superset Filter.mem_inf_iff_superset
instance : Top (Filter α) :=
⟨{ sets := { s | ∀ x, x ∈ s }
univ_sets := fun x => mem_univ x
sets_of_superset := fun hx hxy a => hxy (hx a)
inter_sets := fun hx hy _ => mem_inter (hx _) (hy _) }⟩
theorem mem_top_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_top_iff_forall Filter.mem_top_iff_forall
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊤ : Filter α) ↔ s = univ := by
rw [mem_top_iff_forall, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.mem_top Filter.mem_top
section CompleteLattice
/- We lift the complete lattice along the Galois connection `generate` / `sets`. Unfortunately,
we want to have different definitional equalities for some lattice operations. So we define them
upfront and change the lattice operations for the complete lattice instance. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) :=
{ @OrderDual.instCompleteLattice _ (giGenerate α).liftCompleteLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _ _s hs => (mem_top.1 hs).symm ▸ univ_mem
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ => mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
sSup := join ∘ 𝓟
le_sSup := fun _ _f hf _s hs => hs hf
sSup_le := fun _ _f hf _s hs _g hg => hf _ hg hs }
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
/-- A filter is `NeBot` if it is not equal to `⊥`, or equivalently the empty set does not belong to
the filter. Bourbaki include this assumption in the definition of a filter but we prefer to have a
`CompleteLattice` structure on `Filter _`, so we use a typeclass argument in lemmas instead. -/
class NeBot (f : Filter α) : Prop where
/-- The filter is nontrivial: `f ≠ ⊥` or equivalently, `∅ ∉ f`. -/
ne' : f ≠ ⊥
#align filter.ne_bot Filter.NeBot
theorem neBot_iff {f : Filter α} : NeBot f ↔ f ≠ ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align filter.ne_bot_iff Filter.neBot_iff
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
#align filter.ne_bot.ne Filter.NeBot.ne
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
#align filter.not_ne_bot Filter.not_neBot
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
#align filter.ne_bot.mono Filter.NeBot.mono
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
#align filter.ne_bot_of_le Filter.neBot_of_le
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
#align filter.sup_ne_bot Filter.sup_neBot
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
#align filter.not_disjoint_self_iff Filter.not_disjoint_self_iff
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
#align filter.bot_sets_eq Filter.bot_sets_eq
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
#align filter.sup_sets_eq Filter.sup_sets_eq
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
#align filter.Sup_sets_eq Filter.sSup_sets_eq
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
#align filter.supr_sets_eq Filter.iSup_sets_eq
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
#align filter.generate_empty Filter.generate_empty
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
#align filter.generate_univ Filter.generate_univ
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
#align filter.generate_union Filter.generate_union
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
#align filter.generate_Union Filter.generate_iUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {s : Set α} : s ∈ (⊥ : Filter α) :=
trivial
#align filter.mem_bot Filter.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_sup Filter.mem_sup
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
#align filter.union_mem_sup Filter.union_mem_sup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup {x : Set α} {s : Set (Filter α)} : x ∈ sSup s ↔ ∀ f ∈ s, x ∈ (f : Filter α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_Sup Filter.mem_sSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter]
#align filter.mem_supr Filter.mem_iSup
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 602 | 603 | theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by |
simp [neBot_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import field_theory.chevalley_warning from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e001509c11c4d0f549d91d89da95b4a0b43c714f"
/-!
# The Chevalley–Warning theorem
This file contains a proof of the Chevalley–Warning theorem.
Throughout most of this file, `K` denotes a finite field
and `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`.
## Main results
1. Let `f` be a multivariate polynomial in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`)
such that the total degree of `f` is less than `(q-1)` times the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the evaluation of `f` on all points of `σ → K` (aka `K^σ`) sums to `0`.
(`sum_eval_eq_zero`)
2. The Chevalley–Warning theorem (`char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt`).
Let `f i` be a finite family of multivariate polynomials
in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) such that
the sum of the total degrees of the `f i` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f i`
is divisible by the characteristic of `K`.
## Notation
- `K` is a finite field
- `q` is notation for the cardinality of `K`
- `σ` is the indexing type for the variables of a multivariate polynomial ring over `K`
-/
universe u v
section FiniteField
open MvPolynomial
open Function hiding eval
open Finset FiniteField
variable {K σ ι : Type*} [Fintype K] [Field K] [Fintype σ] [DecidableEq σ]
local notation "q" => Fintype.card K
theorem MvPolynomial.sum_eval_eq_zero (f : MvPolynomial σ K)
(h : f.totalDegree < (q - 1) * Fintype.card σ) : ∑ x, eval x f = 0 := by
haveI : DecidableEq K := Classical.decEq K
calc
∑ x, eval x f = ∑ x : σ → K, ∑ d ∈ f.support, f.coeff d * ∏ i, x i ^ d i := by
simp only [eval_eq']
_ = ∑ d ∈ f.support, ∑ x : σ → K, f.coeff d * ∏ i, x i ^ d i := sum_comm
_ = 0 := sum_eq_zero ?_
intro d hd
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, d i < q - 1 := f.exists_degree_lt (q - 1) h hd
calc
(∑ x : σ → K, f.coeff d * ∏ i, x i ^ d i) = f.coeff d * ∑ x : σ → K, ∏ i, x i ^ d i :=
(mul_sum ..).symm
_ = 0 := (mul_eq_zero.mpr ∘ Or.inr) ?_
calc
(∑ x : σ → K, ∏ i, x i ^ d i) =
∑ x₀ : { j // j ≠ i } → K, ∑ x : { x : σ → K // x ∘ (↑) = x₀ }, ∏ j, (x : σ → K) j ^ d j :=
(Fintype.sum_fiberwise _ _).symm
_ = 0 := Fintype.sum_eq_zero _ ?_
intro x₀
let e : K ≃ { x // x ∘ ((↑) : _ → σ) = x₀ } := (Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain _).symm
calc
(∑ x : { x : σ → K // x ∘ (↑) = x₀ }, ∏ j, (x : σ → K) j ^ d j) =
∑ a : K, ∏ j : σ, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j := (e.sum_comp _).symm
_ = ∑ a : K, (∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j) * a ^ d i := Fintype.sum_congr _ _ ?_
_ = (∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j) * ∑ a : K, a ^ d i := by rw [mul_sum]
_ = 0 := by rw [sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one K _ hi, mul_zero]
intro a
let e' : Sum { j // j = i } { j // j ≠ i } ≃ σ := Equiv.sumCompl _
letI : Unique { j // j = i } :=
{ default := ⟨i, rfl⟩
uniq := fun ⟨j, h⟩ => Subtype.val_injective h }
calc
(∏ j : σ, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j) =
(e a : σ → K) i ^ d i * ∏ j : { j // j ≠ i }, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j := by
rw [← e'.prod_comp, Fintype.prod_sum_type, univ_unique, prod_singleton]; rfl
_ = a ^ d i * ∏ j : { j // j ≠ i }, (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j := by
rw [Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_eq]
_ = a ^ d i * ∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j := congr_arg _ (Fintype.prod_congr _ _ ?_)
-- see below
_ = (∏ j, x₀ j ^ d j) * a ^ d i := mul_comm _ _
-- the remaining step of the calculation above
rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
show (e a : σ → K) j ^ d j = x₀ ⟨j, hj⟩ ^ d j
rw [Equiv.subtypeEquivCodomain_symm_apply_ne]
#align mv_polynomial.sum_eval_eq_zero MvPolynomial.sum_eval_eq_zero
variable [DecidableEq K] (p : ℕ) [CharP K p]
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, finitary version.
Let `(f i)` be a finite family of multivariate polynomials
in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) over a finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the sum of the total degrees of the `f i` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f i` is divisible by `p`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ K}
(h : (∑ i ∈ s, (f i).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0 } := by
have hq : 0 < q - 1 := by rw [← Fintype.card_units, Fintype.card_pos_iff]; exact ⟨1⟩
let S : Finset (σ → K) := { x ∈ univ | ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0 }.toFinset
have hS : ∀ x : σ → K, x ∈ S ↔ ∀ i : ι, i ∈ s → eval x (f i) = 0 := by
intro x
simp only [S, Set.toFinset_setOf, mem_univ, true_and, mem_filter]
/- The polynomial `F = ∏ i ∈ s, (1 - (f i)^(q - 1))` has the nice property
that it takes the value `1` on elements of `{x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).eval x = 0}`
while it is `0` outside that locus.
Hence the sum of its values is equal to the cardinality of
`{x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, (f i).eval x = 0}` modulo `p`. -/
let F : MvPolynomial σ K := ∏ i ∈ s, (1 - f i ^ (q - 1))
have hF : ∀ x, eval x F = if x ∈ S then 1 else 0 := by
intro x
calc
eval x F = ∏ i ∈ s, eval x (1 - f i ^ (q - 1)) := eval_prod s _ x
_ = if x ∈ S then 1 else 0 := ?_
simp only [(eval x).map_sub, (eval x).map_pow, (eval x).map_one]
split_ifs with hx
· apply Finset.prod_eq_one
intro i hi
rw [hS] at hx
rw [hx i hi, zero_pow hq.ne', sub_zero]
· obtain ⟨i, hi, hx⟩ : ∃ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) ≠ 0 := by
simpa [hS, not_forall, Classical.not_imp] using hx
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero hi
rw [pow_card_sub_one_eq_one (eval x (f i)) hx, sub_self]
-- In particular, we can now show:
have key : ∑ x, eval x F = Fintype.card { x : σ → K // ∀ i ∈ s, eval x (f i) = 0 } := by
rw [Fintype.card_of_subtype S hS, card_eq_sum_ones, Nat.cast_sum, Nat.cast_one, ←
Fintype.sum_extend_by_zero S, sum_congr rfl fun x _ => hF x]
-- With these preparations under our belt, we will approach the main goal.
show p ∣ Fintype.card { x // ∀ i : ι, i ∈ s → eval x (f i) = 0 }
rw [← CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff K, ← key]
show (∑ x, eval x F) = 0
-- We are now ready to apply the main machine, proven before.
apply F.sum_eval_eq_zero
-- It remains to verify the crucial assumption of this machine
show F.totalDegree < (q - 1) * Fintype.card σ
calc
F.totalDegree ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (1 - f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree := totalDegree_finset_prod s _
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (q - 1) * (f i).totalDegree := sum_le_sum fun i _ => ?_
-- see ↓
_ = (q - 1) * ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).totalDegree := (mul_sum ..).symm
_ < (q - 1) * Fintype.card σ := by rwa [mul_lt_mul_left hq]
-- Now we prove the remaining step from the preceding calculation
show (1 - f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree ≤ (q - 1) * (f i).totalDegree
calc
(1 - f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree ≤
max (1 : MvPolynomial σ K).totalDegree (f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree := totalDegree_sub _ _
_ ≤ (f i ^ (q - 1)).totalDegree := by simp
_ ≤ (q - 1) * (f i).totalDegree := totalDegree_pow _ _
#align char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, `Fintype` version.
Let `(f i)` be a finite family of multivariate polynomials
in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) over a finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the sum of the total degrees of the `f i` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f i` is divisible by `p`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions_of_fintype_sum_lt [Fintype ι] {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ K}
(h : (∑ i, (f i).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // ∀ i, eval x (f i) = 0 } := by
simpa using char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt p h
#align char_dvd_card_solutions_of_fintype_sum_lt char_dvd_card_solutions_of_fintype_sum_lt
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, unary version.
Let `f` be a multivariate polynomial in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`)
over a finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the total degree of `f` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of solutions of `f` is divisible by `p`.
See `char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt` for a version that takes a family of polynomials `f i`. -/
theorem char_dvd_card_solutions {f : MvPolynomial σ K} (h : f.totalDegree < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // eval x f = 0 } := by
let F : Unit → MvPolynomial σ K := fun _ => f
have : (∑ i : Unit, (F i).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ := h
-- Porting note: was
-- `simpa only [F, Fintype.univ_punit, forall_eq, mem_singleton] using`
-- ` char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt p this`
convert char_dvd_card_solutions_of_sum_lt p this
aesop
#align char_dvd_card_solutions char_dvd_card_solutions
/-- The **Chevalley–Warning theorem**, binary version.
Let `f₁`, `f₂` be two multivariate polynomials in finitely many variables (`X s`, `s : σ`) over a
finite field of characteristic `p`.
Assume that the sum of the total degrees of `f₁` and `f₂` is less than the cardinality of `σ`.
Then the number of common solutions of the `f₁` and `f₂` is divisible by `p`. -/
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/ChevalleyWarning.lean | 196 | 201 | theorem char_dvd_card_solutions_of_add_lt {f₁ f₂ : MvPolynomial σ K}
(h : f₁.totalDegree + f₂.totalDegree < Fintype.card σ) :
p ∣ Fintype.card { x : σ → K // eval x f₁ = 0 ∧ eval x f₂ = 0 } := by |
let F : Bool → MvPolynomial σ K := fun b => cond b f₂ f₁
have : (∑ b : Bool, (F b).totalDegree) < Fintype.card σ := (add_comm _ _).trans_lt h
simpa only [Bool.forall_bool] using char_dvd_card_solutions_of_fintype_sum_lt p this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
#align_import dynamics.circle.rotation_number.translation_number from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open scoped Classical
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift extends ℝ →o ℝ : Type where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
#align circle_deg1_lift CircleDeg1Lift
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mk CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mk
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
#align circle_deg1_lift.monotone CircleDeg1Lift.monotone
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
#align circle_deg1_lift.mono CircleDeg1Lift.mono
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
#align circle_deg1_lift.strict_mono_iff_injective CircleDeg1Lift.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_one
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_one_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_one_add
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.coe_inj -- Use `DFunLike.coe_inj`
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext CircleDeg1Lift.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext_iff CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one f := rfl
one_mul f := rfl
mul_assoc f₁ f₂ f₃ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mul CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_apply CircleDeg1Lift.mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_one CircleDeg1Lift.coe_one
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_has_coe_to_fun CircleDeg1Lift.unitsHasCoeToFun
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.units_coe -- now LHS = RHS
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_inv_apply_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_inv_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_apply_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_apply_inv_apply
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' f g := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_symm CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_inv CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_inv
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.is_unit_iff_bijective CircleDeg1Lift.isUnit_iff_bijective
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_pow CircleDeg1Lift.coe_pow
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.semiconj_by_iff_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.semiconjBy_iff_semiconj
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_iff_commute CircleDeg1Lift.commute_iff_commute
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => Multiplicative.toAdd x + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate CircleDeg1Lift.translate
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_inv_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_pow
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_iterate CircleDeg1Lift.translate_iterate
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_nat_add
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_nat
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_nat
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_int
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_int_add
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_add
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_int
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_nat_add
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_nat
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_of_map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq CircleDeg1Lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
-/
/-- Monotone circle maps form a lattice with respect to the pointwise order -/
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm f₁ f₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf f₁ f₂ f₃ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.sup_apply CircleDeg1Lift.sup_apply
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.inf_apply CircleDeg1Lift.inf_apply
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_monotone
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_mono CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_mono
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_mono CircleDeg1Lift.pow_mono
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.pow_monotone
/-!
### Estimates on `(f * g) 0`
We prove the estimates `f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉` and some corollaries with added/removed
floors and ceils.
We also prove that for two semiconjugate maps `g₁`, `g₂`, the distance between `g₁ 0` and `g₂ 0`
is less than two.
-/
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_le_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_le_of_map_zero
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_le
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.floor_map_map_zero_le
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_lt
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_of_map_zero
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_map_zero
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_floor_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_floor_map_map_zero
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_map_zero
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy
/-!
### Limits at infinities and continuity
-/
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_bot CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atBot
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_top CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atTop
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.continuous_iff_surjective CircleDeg1Lift.continuous_iff_surjective
/-!
### Estimates on `(f^n) x`
If we know that `f x` is `≤`/`<`/`≥`/`>`/`=` to `x + m`, then we have a similar estimate on
`f^[n] x` and `x + n * m`.
For `≤`, `≥`, and `=` we formulate both `of` (implication) and `iff` versions because implications
work for `n = 0`. For `<` and `>` we formulate only `iff` versions.
-/
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_le_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_le_iff
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff
theorem le_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x ↔ x + m ≤ f x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_lt_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_pos_iff
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 611 | 613 | theorem lt_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m < f^[n] x ↔ x + m < f x := by |
simpa only [not_le] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_le_iff hn)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
#align_import algebra.module.zlattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3e83f0fa4391c8740f7d773a7a9b74e311ae2a3"
/-!
# ℤ-lattices
Let `E` be a finite dimensional vector space over a `NormedLinearOrderedField` `K` with a solid
norm that is also a `FloorRing`, e.g. `ℝ`. A (full) `ℤ`-lattice `L` of `E` is a discrete
subgroup of `E` such that `L` spans `E` over `K`.
A `ℤ`-lattice `L` can be defined in two ways:
* For `b` a basis of `E`, then `L = Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)` is a ℤ-lattice of `E`
* As an `AddSubgroup E` with the additional properties:
* `DiscreteTopology L`, that is `L` is discrete
* `Submodule.span ℝ (L : Set E) = ⊤`, that is `L` spans `E` over `K`.
Results about the first point of view are in the `Zspan` namespace and results about the second
point of view are in the `Zlattice` namespace.
## Main results
* `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`: for a ℤ-lattice `Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)`, proves that
the set defined by `Zspan.fundamentalDomain` is a fundamental domain.
* `Zlattice.module_free`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module
* `Zlattice.rank`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module of `ℤ`-rank equal to the `K`-rank of `E`
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Zspan
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSet Submodule Bornology
variable {E ι : Type*}
section NormedLatticeField
variable {K : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField K]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
variable (b : Basis ι K E)
theorem span_top : span K (span ℤ (Set.range b) : Set E) = ⊤ := by simp [span_span_of_tower]
/-- The fundamental domain of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b`. See `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`
for the proof that it is a fundamental domain. -/
def fundamentalDomain : Set E := {m | ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1}
#align zspan.fundamental_domain Zspan.fundamentalDomain
@[simp]
theorem mem_fundamentalDomain {m : E} :
m ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1 := Iff.rfl
#align zspan.mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.mem_fundamentalDomain
theorem map_fundamentalDomain {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace K F] (f : E ≃ₗ[K] F) :
f '' (fundamentalDomain b) = fundamentalDomain (b.map f) := by
ext x
rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.map_repr, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, ← mem_fundamentalDomain,
show f.symm x = f.toEquiv.symm x by rfl, ← Set.mem_image_equiv]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fundamentalDomain_reindex {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
fundamentalDomain (b.reindex e) = fundamentalDomain b := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.repr_reindex_apply]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr' e]
simp_rw [implies_true]
lemma fundamentalDomain_pi_basisFun [Fintype ι] :
fundamentalDomain (Pi.basisFun ℝ ι) = Set.pi Set.univ fun _ : ι ↦ Set.Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
ext; simp
variable [FloorRing K]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding down its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def floor (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌊b.repr m i⌋ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.floor Zspan.floor
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding up its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def ceil (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌈b.repr m i⌉ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.ceil Zspan.ceil
@[simp]
theorem repr_floor_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (floor b m) i = ⌊b.repr m i⌋ := by
classical simp only [floor, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_floor_apply Zspan.repr_floor_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_ceil_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (ceil b m) i = ⌈b.repr m i⌉ := by
classical simp only [ceil, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_ceil_apply Zspan.repr_ceil_apply
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (floor b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_floor_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.floor_intCast z)
#align zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (ceil b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_ceil_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.ceil_intCast z)
#align zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem
/-- The map that sends a vector `E` to the `fundamentalDomain` of the lattice,
see `Zspan.fract_mem_fundamentalDomain`, and `fractRestrict` for the map with the codomain
restricted to `fundamentalDomain`. -/
def fract (m : E) : E := m - floor b m
#align zspan.fract Zspan.fract
theorem fract_apply (m : E) : fract b m = m - floor b m := rfl
#align zspan.fract_apply Zspan.fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_fract_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (fract b m) i = Int.fract (b.repr m i) := by
rw [fract, map_sub, Finsupp.coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply, repr_floor_apply, Int.fract]
#align zspan.repr_fract_apply Zspan.repr_fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (m : E) : fract b (fract b m) = fract b m :=
Basis.ext_elem b fun _ => by classical simp only [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_fract]
#align zspan.fract_fract Zspan.fract_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_zspan_add (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (v + m) = fract b m := by
classical
refine (Basis.ext_elem_iff b).mpr fun i => ?_
simp_rw [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_fract]
use (b.restrictScalars ℤ).repr ⟨v, h⟩ i
rw [map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_tsub_cancel_right,
← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ K) _, Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply, coe_mk]
#align zspan.fract_zspan_add Zspan.fract_zspan_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_zspan (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (m + v) = fract b m := by rw [add_comm, fract_zspan_add b m h]
#align zspan.fract_add_zspan Zspan.fract_add_zspan
variable {b}
theorem fract_eq_self {x : E} : fract b x = x ↔ x ∈ fundamentalDomain b := by
classical simp only [Basis.ext_elem_iff b, repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_self,
mem_fundamentalDomain, Set.mem_Ico]
#align zspan.fract_eq_self Zspan.fract_eq_self
variable (b)
theorem fract_mem_fundamentalDomain (x : E) : fract b x ∈ fundamentalDomain b :=
fract_eq_self.mp (fract_fract b _)
#align zspan.fract_mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.fract_mem_fundamentalDomain
/-- The map `fract` with codomain restricted to `fundamentalDomain`. -/
def fractRestrict (x : E) : fundamentalDomain b := ⟨fract b x, fract_mem_fundamentalDomain b x⟩
theorem fractRestrict_surjective : Function.Surjective (fractRestrict b) :=
fun x => ⟨↑x, Subtype.eq (fract_eq_self.mpr (Subtype.mem x))⟩
@[simp]
theorem fractRestrict_apply (x : E) : (fractRestrict b x : E) = fract b x := rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Zlattice/Basic.lean | 192 | 197 | theorem fract_eq_fract (m n : E) : fract b m = fract b n ↔ -m + n ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b) := by |
classical
rw [eq_comm, Basis.ext_elem_iff b]
simp_rw [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_fract, eq_comm, Basis.mem_span_iff_repr_mem,
sub_eq_neg_add, map_add, map_neg, Finsupp.coe_add, Finsupp.coe_neg, Pi.add_apply,
Pi.neg_apply, ← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ K) _, Set.mem_range]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.fin.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3a2b5524a138b5d0b818b858b516d4ac8a484b03"
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
* `Fin.succRec` : Define `C n i` by induction on `i : Fin n` interpreted
as `(0 : Fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`. This function has two arguments: `H0 n` defines
`0`-th element `C (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple, and `Hs n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element
of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and `i`-th element of `n`-tuple.
* `Fin.succRecOn` : same as `Fin.succRec` but `i : Fin n` is the first argument;
* `Fin.induction` : Define `C i` by induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)`, separating into the
`Nat`-like base cases of `C 0` and `C (i.succ)`.
* `Fin.inductionOn` : same as `Fin.induction` but with `i : Fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
* `Fin.cases` : define `f : Π i : Fin n.succ, C i` by separately handling the cases `i = 0` and
`i = Fin.succ j`, `j : Fin n`, defined using `Fin.induction`.
* `Fin.reverseInduction`: reverse induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)`; given `C (Fin.last n)` and
`∀ i : Fin n, C (Fin.succ i) → C (Fin.castSucc i)`, constructs all values `C i` by going down;
* `Fin.lastCases`: define `f : Π i, Fin (n + 1), C i` by separately handling the cases
`i = Fin.last n` and `i = Fin.castSucc j`, a special case of `Fin.reverseInduction`;
* `Fin.addCases`: define a function on `Fin (m + n)` by separately handling the cases
`Fin.castAdd n i` and `Fin.natAdd m i`;
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: given `i : Fin (n + 1)`, define a function on `Fin (n + 1)` by separately
handling the cases `j = i` and `j = Fin.succAbove i k`, same as `Fin.insertNth` but marked
as eliminator and works for `Sort*`. -- Porting note: this is in another file
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.ofNat'`: given a positive number `n` (deduced from `[NeZero n]`), `Fin.ofNat' i` is
`i % n` interpreted as an element of `Fin n`;
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
### Misc definitions
* `Fin.revPerm : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)` : `Fin.rev` as an `Equiv.Perm`, the antitone involution given
by `i ↦ n-(i+1)`
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
open Fin Nat Function
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
#align fin_zero_elim finZeroElim
namespace Fin
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
#align fin.elim0' Fin.elim0
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
#align fin.fin_to_nat Fin.coeToNat
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
#align fin.val_injective Fin.val_injective
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
#align fin.prop Fin.prop
#align fin.is_lt Fin.is_lt
#align fin.pos Fin.pos
#align fin.pos_iff_nonempty Fin.pos_iff_nonempty
section Order
variable {a b c : Fin n}
protected lemma lt_of_le_of_lt : a ≤ b → b < c → a < c := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt
protected lemma lt_of_lt_of_le : a < b → b ≤ c → a < c := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le
protected lemma le_rfl : a ≤ a := Nat.le_refl _
protected lemma lt_iff_le_and_ne : a < b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← val_ne_iff]; exact Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne
protected lemma lt_or_lt_of_ne (h : a ≠ b) : a < b ∨ b < a := Nat.lt_or_lt_of_ne $ val_ne_iff.2 h
protected lemma lt_or_le (a b : Fin n) : a < b ∨ b ≤ a := Nat.lt_or_ge _ _
protected lemma le_or_lt (a b : Fin n) : a ≤ b ∨ b < a := (b.lt_or_le a).symm
protected lemma le_of_eq (hab : a = b) : a ≤ b := Nat.le_of_eq $ congr_arg val hab
protected lemma ge_of_eq (hab : a = b) : b ≤ a := Fin.le_of_eq hab.symm
protected lemma eq_or_lt_of_le : a ≤ b → a = b ∨ a < b := by rw [ext_iff]; exact Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le
protected lemma lt_or_eq_of_le : a ≤ b → a < b ∨ a = b := by rw [ext_iff]; exact Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le
end Order
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt $ Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align fin.equiv_subtype Fin.equivSubtype
#align fin.equiv_subtype_symm_apply Fin.equivSubtype_symm_apply
#align fin.equiv_subtype_apply Fin.equivSubtype_apply
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
#align fin.eta Fin.eta
#align fin.ext Fin.ext
#align fin.ext_iff Fin.ext_iff
#align fin.coe_injective Fin.val_injective
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
ext_iff.symm
#align fin.coe_eq_coe Fin.val_eq_val
@[deprecated ext_iff (since := "2024-02-20")]
theorem eq_iff_veq (a b : Fin n) : a = b ↔ a.1 = b.1 :=
ext_iff
#align fin.eq_iff_veq Fin.eq_iff_veq
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
ext_iff.not
#align fin.ne_iff_vne Fin.ne_iff_vne
-- Porting note: I'm not sure if this comment still applies.
-- built-in reduction doesn't always work
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
ext_iff
#align fin.mk_eq_mk Fin.mk_eq_mk
#align fin.mk.inj_iff Fin.mk.inj_iff
#align fin.mk_val Fin.val_mk
#align fin.eq_mk_iff_coe_eq Fin.eq_mk_iff_val_eq
#align fin.coe_mk Fin.val_mk
#align fin.mk_coe Fin.mk_val
-- syntactic tautologies now
#noalign fin.coe_eq_val
#noalign fin.val_eq_coe
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [Function.funext_iff]
#align fin.heq_fun_iff Fin.heq_fun_iff
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [Function.funext_iff]
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
#align fin.heq_ext_iff Fin.heq_ext_iff
#align fin.exists_iff Fin.exists_iff
#align fin.forall_iff Fin.forall_iff
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
#align fin.is_le Fin.is_le
#align fin.is_le' Fin.is_le'
#align fin.lt_iff_coe_lt_coe Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align fin.le_iff_coe_le_coe Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
#align fin.mk_lt_of_lt_coe Fin.mk_lt_of_lt_val
#align fin.mk_le_of_le_coe Fin.mk_le_of_le_val
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
#align fin.coe_fin_lt Fin.val_fin_lt
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align fin.coe_fin_le Fin.val_fin_le
#align fin.mk_le_mk Fin.mk_le_mk
#align fin.mk_lt_mk Fin.mk_lt_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
#align fin.min_coe Fin.min_val
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
#align fin.max_coe Fin.max_val
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
#align fin.coe_embedding Fin.valEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
#align fin.equiv_subtype_symm_trans_val_embedding Fin.equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
/-- Given a positive `n`, `Fin.ofNat' i` is `i % n` as an element of `Fin n`. -/
def ofNat'' [NeZero n] (i : ℕ) : Fin n :=
⟨i % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩
#align fin.of_nat' Fin.ofNat''ₓ
-- Porting note: `Fin.ofNat'` conflicts with something in core (there the hypothesis is `n > 0`),
-- so for now we make this double-prime `''`. This is also the reason for the dubious translation.
instance {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : Zero (Fin n) := ⟨ofNat'' 0⟩
instance {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : One (Fin n) := ⟨ofNat'' 1⟩
#align fin.coe_zero Fin.val_zero
/--
The `Fin.val_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((0 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 0 :=
rfl
#align fin.val_zero' Fin.val_zero'
#align fin.mk_zero Fin.mk_zero
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
#align fin.zero_le Fin.zero_le'
#align fin.zero_lt_one Fin.zero_lt_one
#align fin.not_lt_zero Fin.not_lt_zero
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero', Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, Ne, ext_iff, val_zero']
#align fin.pos_iff_ne_zero Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero'
#align fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ
#align fin.eq_succ_of_ne_zero Fin.eq_succ_of_ne_zero
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : cast rfl a = a := rfl
theorem rev_involutive : Involutive (rev : Fin n → Fin n) := fun i =>
ext <| by
dsimp only [rev]
rw [← Nat.sub_sub, Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 i.is_lt), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
#align fin.rev_involutive Fin.rev_involutive
/-- `Fin.rev` as an `Equiv.Perm`, the antitone involution `Fin n → Fin n` given by
`i ↦ n-(i+1)`. -/
@[simps! apply symm_apply]
def revPerm : Equiv.Perm (Fin n) :=
Involutive.toPerm rev rev_involutive
#align fin.rev Fin.revPerm
#align fin.coe_rev Fin.val_revₓ
theorem rev_injective : Injective (@rev n) :=
rev_involutive.injective
#align fin.rev_injective Fin.rev_injective
theorem rev_surjective : Surjective (@rev n) :=
rev_involutive.surjective
#align fin.rev_surjective Fin.rev_surjective
theorem rev_bijective : Bijective (@rev n) :=
rev_involutive.bijective
#align fin.rev_bijective Fin.rev_bijective
#align fin.rev_inj Fin.rev_injₓ
#align fin.rev_rev Fin.rev_revₓ
@[simp]
theorem revPerm_symm : (@revPerm n).symm = revPerm :=
rfl
#align fin.rev_symm Fin.revPerm_symm
#align fin.rev_eq Fin.rev_eqₓ
#align fin.rev_le_rev Fin.rev_le_revₓ
#align fin.rev_lt_rev Fin.rev_lt_revₓ
theorem cast_rev (i : Fin n) (h : n = m) :
cast h i.rev = (i.cast h).rev := by
subst h; simp
theorem rev_eq_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i = j ↔ i = rev j := by
rw [← rev_inj, rev_rev]
theorem rev_ne_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i ≠ j ↔ i ≠ rev j := rev_eq_iff.not
theorem rev_lt_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i < j ↔ rev j < i := by
rw [← rev_lt_rev, rev_rev]
theorem rev_le_iff {i j : Fin n} : rev i ≤ j ↔ rev j ≤ i := by
rw [← rev_le_rev, rev_rev]
theorem lt_rev_iff {i j : Fin n} : i < rev j ↔ j < rev i := by
rw [← rev_lt_rev, rev_rev]
theorem le_rev_iff {i j : Fin n} : i ≤ rev j ↔ j ≤ rev i := by
rw [← rev_le_rev, rev_rev]
#align fin.last Fin.last
#align fin.coe_last Fin.val_last
-- Porting note: this is now syntactically equal to `val_last`
#align fin.last_val Fin.val_last
#align fin.le_last Fin.le_last
#align fin.last_pos Fin.last_pos
#align fin.eq_last_of_not_lt Fin.eq_last_of_not_lt
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos.2 n.pos_of_neZero
end Order
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
#align fin.val_one Fin.val_one
#align fin.coe_one Fin.val_one
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
#align fin.coe_one' Fin.val_one'
-- Porting note: Delete this lemma after porting
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
#align fin.one_val Fin.val_one''
#align fin.mk_one Fin.mk_one
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero, Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
-- Porting note: here and in the next lemma, had to use `← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero`.
#align fin.nontrivial_iff_two_le Fin.nontrivial_iff_two_le
#align fin.subsingleton_iff_le_one Fin.subsingleton_iff_le_one
section Monoid
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`, `simp` can prove it with AddCommMonoid instance
protected theorem add_zero [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : k + 0 = k := by
simp only [add_def, val_zero', Nat.add_zero, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
#align fin.add_zero Fin.add_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`, `simp` can prove it with AddCommMonoid instance
protected theorem zero_add [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) : 0 + k = k := by
simp [ext_iff, add_def, mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
#align fin.zero_add Fin.zero_add
instance {a : ℕ} [NeZero n] : OfNat (Fin n) a where
ofNat := Fin.ofNat' a n.pos_of_neZero
instance inhabited (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Inhabited (Fin n) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
#align fin.default_eq_zero Fin.default_eq_zero
section from_ad_hoc
@[simp] lemma ofNat'_zero {h : 0 < n} [NeZero n] : (Fin.ofNat' 0 h : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma ofNat'_one {h : 0 < n} [NeZero n] : (Fin.ofNat' 1 h : Fin n) = 1 := rfl
end from_ad_hoc
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast n := Fin.ofNat'' n
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
#align fin.val_add Fin.val_add
#align fin.coe_add Fin.val_add
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
#align fin.coe_add_eq_ite Fin.val_add_eq_ite
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated]
theorem val_bit0 {n : ℕ} (k : Fin n) : ((bit0 k : Fin n) : ℕ) = bit0 (k : ℕ) % n := by
cases k
rfl
#align fin.coe_bit0 Fin.val_bit0
@[deprecated]
theorem val_bit1 {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (k : Fin n) :
((bit1 k : Fin n) : ℕ) = bit1 (k : ℕ) % n := by
cases n;
· cases' k with k h
cases k
· show _ % _ = _
simp at h
cases' h with _ h
simp [bit1, Fin.val_bit0, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_one]
#align fin.coe_bit1 Fin.val_bit1
end deprecated
#align fin.coe_add_one_of_lt Fin.val_add_one_of_lt
#align fin.last_add_one Fin.last_add_one
#align fin.coe_add_one Fin.val_add_one
section Bit
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[simp, deprecated]
theorem mk_bit0 {m n : ℕ} (h : bit0 m < n) :
(⟨bit0 m, h⟩ : Fin n) = (bit0 ⟨m, (Nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt h⟩ : Fin _) :=
eq_of_val_eq (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h).symm
#align fin.mk_bit0 Fin.mk_bit0
@[simp, deprecated]
theorem mk_bit1 {m n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (h : bit1 m < n) :
(⟨bit1 m, h⟩ : Fin n) =
(bit1 ⟨m, (Nat.le_add_right m m).trans_lt ((m + m).lt_succ_self.trans h)⟩ : Fin _) := by
ext
simp only [bit1, bit0] at h
simp only [bit1, bit0, val_add, val_one', ← Nat.add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
#align fin.mk_bit1 Fin.mk_bit1
end Bit
#align fin.val_two Fin.val_two
--- Porting note: syntactically the same as the above
#align fin.coe_two Fin.val_two
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat''_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (Fin.ofNat'' a : Fin n) = a :=
rfl
#align fin.of_nat_eq_coe Fin.ofNat''_eq_cast
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
-- Porting note: is this the right name for things involving `Nat.cast`?
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
#align fin.coe_val_of_lt Fin.val_cast_of_lt
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
#align fin.coe_val_eq_self Fin.cast_val_eq_self
-- Porting note: this is syntactically the same as `val_cast_of_lt`
#align fin.coe_coe_of_lt Fin.val_cast_of_lt
-- Porting note: this is syntactically the same as `cast_val_of_lt`
#align fin.coe_coe_eq_self Fin.cast_val_eq_self
@[simp] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_zero := natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
#align fin.coe_nat_eq_last Fin.natCast_eq_last
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias cast_nat_eq_last := natCast_eq_last
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
#align fin.le_coe_last Fin.le_val_last
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
#align fin.add_one_pos Fin.add_one_pos
#align fin.one_pos Fin.one_pos
#align fin.zero_ne_one Fin.zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] : (1 : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
obtain _ | _ | n := n <;> simp [Fin.ext_iff]
#align fin.one_eq_zero_iff Fin.one_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_one_iff [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin n) = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by rw [eq_comm, one_eq_zero_iff]
#align fin.zero_eq_one_iff Fin.zero_eq_one_iff
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
#align fin.coe_succ Fin.val_succ
#align fin.succ_pos Fin.succ_pos
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [ext_iff]
#align fin.succ_injective Fin.succ_injective
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem val_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ := rfl
#align fin.succ_le_succ_iff Fin.succ_le_succ_iff
#align fin.succ_lt_succ_iff Fin.succ_lt_succ_iff
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
#align fin.exists_succ_eq_iff Fin.exists_succ_eq
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
#align fin.succ_inj Fin.succ_inj
#align fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.succ_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
#align fin.succ_zero_eq_one Fin.succ_zero_eq_one'
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
#align fin.succ_zero_eq_one' Fin.succ_zero_eq_one
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
#align fin.succ_one_eq_two Fin.succ_one_eq_two'
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
#align fin.succ_one_eq_two' Fin.succ_one_eq_two
#align fin.succ_mk Fin.succ_mk
#align fin.mk_succ_pos Fin.mk_succ_pos
#align fin.one_lt_succ_succ Fin.one_lt_succ_succ
#align fin.add_one_lt_iff Fin.add_one_lt_iff
#align fin.add_one_le_iff Fin.add_one_le_iff
#align fin.last_le_iff Fin.last_le_iff
#align fin.lt_add_one_iff Fin.lt_add_one_iff
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
#align fin.le_zero_iff Fin.le_zero_iff'
#align fin.succ_succ_ne_one Fin.succ_succ_ne_one
#align fin.cast_lt Fin.castLT
#align fin.coe_cast_lt Fin.coe_castLT
#align fin.cast_lt_mk Fin.castLT_mk
-- Move to Batteries?
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {n : Nat} (h : n = n) :
Fin.cast h = id := rfl
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun a b hab ↦ ext (by have := congr_arg val hab; exact this)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
#align fin.cast_succ_injective Fin.castSucc_injective
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps! apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
#align fin.coe_cast_le Fin.coe_castLE
#align fin.cast_le_mk Fin.castLE_mk
#align fin.cast_le_zero Fin.castLE_zero
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
assert_not_exists Fintype
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
cases' h with e
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
#align fin.equiv_iff_eq Fin.equiv_iff_eq
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, Fin.ext rfl⟩⟩
#align fin.range_cast_le Fin.range_castLE
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
#align fin.coe_of_injective_cast_le_symm Fin.coe_of_injective_castLE_symm
#align fin.cast_le_succ Fin.castLE_succ
#align fin.cast_le_cast_le Fin.castLE_castLE
#align fin.cast_le_comp_cast_le Fin.castLE_comp_castLE
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (cast eq.symm) (cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (cast eq.symm) (cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : cast eq a ≤ cast eq b ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := cast eq
invFun := cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
#align fin_congr finCongr
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
#align fin_congr_apply_mk finCongr_apply_mk
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
#align fin_congr_symm finCongr_symm
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
#align fin_congr_apply_coe finCongr_apply_coe
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
#align fin_congr_symm_apply_coe finCongr_symm_apply_coe
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
#align fin.coe_cast Fin.coe_castₓ
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero {n' : ℕ} [NeZero n] {h : n = n'} : cast h (0 : Fin n) =
by { haveI : NeZero n' := by {rw [← h]; infer_instance}; exact 0} :=
ext rfl
#align fin.cast_zero Fin.cast_zero
#align fin.cast_last Fin.cast_lastₓ
#align fin.cast_mk Fin.cast_mkₓ
#align fin.cast_trans Fin.cast_transₓ
#align fin.cast_le_of_eq Fin.castLE_of_eq
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
#align fin.cast_eq_cast Fin.cast_eq_cast
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
#align fin.coe_cast_add Fin.coe_castAdd
#align fin.cast_add_zero Fin.castAdd_zeroₓ
#align fin.cast_add_lt Fin.castAdd_lt
#align fin.cast_add_mk Fin.castAdd_mk
#align fin.cast_add_cast_lt Fin.castAdd_castLT
#align fin.cast_lt_cast_add Fin.castLT_castAdd
#align fin.cast_add_cast Fin.castAdd_castₓ
#align fin.cast_cast_add_left Fin.cast_castAdd_leftₓ
#align fin.cast_cast_add_right Fin.cast_castAdd_rightₓ
#align fin.cast_add_cast_add Fin.castAdd_castAdd
#align fin.cast_succ_eq Fin.cast_succ_eqₓ
#align fin.succ_cast_eq Fin.succ_cast_eqₓ
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
#align fin.coe_cast_succ Fin.coe_castSucc
#align fin.cast_succ_mk Fin.castSucc_mk
#align fin.cast_cast_succ Fin.cast_castSuccₓ
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_succ Fin.castSucc_lt_succ
#align fin.le_cast_succ_iff Fin.le_castSucc_iff
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_iff_succ_le Fin.castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le
#align fin.succ_last Fin.succ_last
#align fin.succ_eq_last_succ Fin.succ_eq_last_succ
#align fin.cast_succ_cast_lt Fin.castSucc_castLT
#align fin.cast_lt_cast_succ Fin.castLT_castSucc
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_cast_succ_iff Fin.castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
#align fin.succ_above_lt_gt Fin.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ
@[deprecated] alias succAbove_lt_gt := castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
#align fin.cast_succ_inj Fin.castSucc_inj
#align fin.cast_succ_lt_last Fin.castSucc_lt_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 :=
ext rfl
#align fin.cast_succ_zero Fin.castSucc_zero'
#align fin.cast_succ_one Fin.castSucc_one
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
theorem castSucc_pos' [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (h : 0 < i) : 0 < castSucc i := by
simpa [lt_iff_val_lt_val] using h
#align fin.cast_succ_pos Fin.castSucc_pos'
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
#align fin.cast_succ_eq_zero_iff Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff'
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
#align fin.cast_succ_ne_zero_iff Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ a
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
#align fin.cast_succ_fin_succ Fin.castSucc_fin_succ
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
#align fin.coe_eq_cast_succ Fin.coe_eq_castSucc
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
#align fin.coe_succ_eq_succ Fin.coeSucc_eq_succ
#align fin.lt_succ Fin.lt_succ
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
#align fin.range_cast_succ Fin.range_castSucc
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
#align fin.coe_of_injective_cast_succ_symm Fin.coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm
#align fin.succ_cast_succ Fin.succ_castSucc
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [ext_iff]
#align fin.coe_add_nat Fin.coe_addNat
#align fin.add_nat_one Fin.addNat_one
#align fin.le_coe_add_nat Fin.le_coe_addNat
#align fin.add_nat_mk Fin.addNat_mk
#align fin.cast_add_nat_zero Fin.cast_addNat_zeroₓ
#align fin.add_nat_cast Fin.addNat_castₓ
#align fin.cast_add_nat_left Fin.cast_addNat_leftₓ
#align fin.cast_add_nat_right Fin.cast_addNat_rightₓ
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [ext_iff]
#align fin.coe_nat_add Fin.coe_natAdd
#align fin.nat_add_mk Fin.natAdd_mk
#align fin.le_coe_nat_add Fin.le_coe_natAdd
#align fin.nat_add_zero Fin.natAdd_zeroₓ
#align fin.nat_add_cast Fin.natAdd_castₓ
#align fin.cast_nat_add_right Fin.cast_natAdd_rightₓ
#align fin.cast_nat_add_left Fin.cast_natAdd_leftₓ
#align fin.cast_add_nat_add Fin.castAdd_natAddₓ
#align fin.nat_add_cast_add Fin.natAdd_castAddₓ
#align fin.nat_add_nat_add Fin.natAdd_natAddₓ
#align fin.cast_nat_add_zero Fin.cast_natAdd_zeroₓ
#align fin.cast_nat_add Fin.cast_natAddₓ
#align fin.cast_add_nat Fin.cast_addNatₓ
#align fin.nat_add_last Fin.natAdd_last
#align fin.nat_add_cast_succ Fin.natAdd_castSucc
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
#align fin.pred Fin.pred
#align fin.coe_pred Fin.coe_pred
#align fin.succ_pred Fin.succ_pred
#align fin.pred_succ Fin.pred_succ
#align fin.pred_eq_iff_eq_succ Fin.pred_eq_iff_eq_succ
#align fin.pred_mk_succ Fin.pred_mk_succ
#align fin.pred_mk Fin.pred_mk
#align fin.pred_le_pred_iff Fin.pred_le_pred_iff
#align fin.pred_lt_pred_iff Fin.pred_lt_pred_iff
#align fin.pred_inj Fin.pred_inj
#align fin.pred_one Fin.pred_one
#align fin.pred_add_one Fin.pred_add_one
#align fin.sub_nat Fin.subNat
#align fin.coe_sub_nat Fin.coe_subNat
#align fin.sub_nat_mk Fin.subNat_mk
#align fin.pred_cast_succ_succ Fin.pred_castSucc_succ
#align fin.add_nat_sub_nat Fin.addNat_subNat
#align fin.sub_nat_add_nat Fin.subNat_addNat
#align fin.nat_add_sub_nat_cast Fin.natAdd_subNat_castₓ
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero', Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := a.castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
#align fin.cast_succ_pred_eq_pred_cast_succ Fin.castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases' a using cases with a
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
#align fin.cast_pred Fin.castPred
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
#align fin.coe_cast_pred Fin.coe_castPred
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
#align fin.cast_pred_cast_succ Fin.castPred_castSucc
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
#align fin.cast_succ_cast_pred Fin.castSucc_castPred
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
#align fin.cast_pred_mk Fin.castPred_mk
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
#align fin.cast_pred_zero Fin.castPred_zero
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
#align fin.cast_pred_one Fin.castPred_one
theorem rev_pred {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ 0) (h' := rev_ne_iff.mpr ((rev_last _).symm ▸ h)) :
rev (pred i h) = castPred (rev i) h' := by
rw [← castSucc_inj, castSucc_castPred, ← rev_succ, succ_pred]
theorem rev_castPred {i : Fin (n + 1)}
(h : i ≠ last n) (h' := rev_ne_iff.mpr ((rev_zero _).symm ▸ h)) :
rev (castPred i h) = pred (rev i) h' := by
rw [← succ_inj, succ_pred, ← rev_castSucc, castSucc_castPred]
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases' a using lastCases with a
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
#align fin.succ_above_below Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
#align fin.succ_above_above Fin.succAbove_of_le_castSucc
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt $ Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_rev_left (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.rev.succAbove i = (p.succAbove i.rev).rev := by
obtain h | h := (rev p).succ_le_or_le_castSucc i
· rw [succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ h,
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (rev_succ _ ▸ (le_rev_iff.mpr h)), rev_succ, rev_rev]
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h,
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (rev_castSucc _ ▸ (rev_le_iff.mpr h)), rev_castSucc, rev_rev]
lemma succAbove_rev_right (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i.rev = (p.rev.succAbove i).rev := by rw [succAbove_rev_left, rev_rev]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
#align fin.succ_above_ne Fin.succAbove_ne
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj $ Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi $ Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
#align fin.succ_above_right_injective Fin.succAbove_right_injective
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
#align fin.succ_above_right_inj Fin.succAbove_right_inj
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
#align fin.succ_above_ne_zero_zero Fin.succAbove_ne_zero_zero
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
#align fin.succ_above_eq_zero_iff Fin.succAbove_eq_zero_iff
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
#align fin.succ_above_ne_zero Fin.succAbove_ne_zero
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
#align fin.succ_above_zero Fin.succAbove_zero
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
simp [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
#align fin.succ_above_last Fin.succAbove_last
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
#align fin.succ_above_last_apply Fin.succAbove_last_apply
@[deprecated] lemma succAbove_lt_ge (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
castSucc i < p ∨ p ≤ castSucc i := Nat.lt_or_ge (castSucc i) p
#align fin.succ_above_lt_ge Fin.succAbove_lt_ge
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
cases' castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 $ Fin.le_of_lt H
#align fin.succ_above_lt_iff Fin.succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
cases' castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 $ Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
#align fin.lt_succ_above_iff Fin.lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
#align fin.succ_above_pos Fin.succAbove_pos
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt $ (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
#align fin.cast_lt_succ_above Fin.castPred_succAbove
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt $ (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
#align fin.pred_succ_above Fin.pred_succAbove
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
#align fin.exists_succ_above_eq Fin.exists_succAbove_eq
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
#align fin.exists_succ_above_eq_iff Fin.exists_succAbove_eq_iff
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
#align fin.range_succ_above Fin.range_succAbove
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
#align fin.range_succ Fin.range_succ
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
#align fin.succ_above_left_injective Fin.succAbove_left_injective
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
#align fin.succ_above_left_inj Fin.succAbove_left_inj
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
#align fin.zero_succ_above Fin.zero_succAbove
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt i.succ 0 (by simp only [castSucc_zero', succ_pos])
#align fin.succ_succ_above_zero Fin.succ_succAbove_zero
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
#align fin.succ_succ_above_succ Fin.succ_succAbove_succ
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
#align fin.pred_succ_above_pred Fin.pred_succAbove_pred
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
/-- `rev` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma rev_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
rev (succAbove p i) = succAbove (rev p) (rev i) := by
rw [succAbove_rev_left, rev_rev]
--@[simp] -- Porting note: can be proved by `simp`
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
#align fin.one_succ_above_zero Fin.one_succAbove_zero
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
#align fin.succ_succ_above_one Fin.succ_succAbove_one
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
#align fin.one_succ_above_succ Fin.one_succAbove_succ
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
#align fin.one_succ_above_one Fin.one_succAbove_one
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
#align fin.pred_above Fin.predAbove
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h $ castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg $ Fin.not_lt.2 h
#align fin.pred_above_below Fin.predAbove_of_le_castSucc
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
#align fin.pred_above_above Fin.predAbove_of_castSucc_lt
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt $ Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) :p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt $ Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt $ Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h $ Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_rev_left (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
p.rev.predAbove i = (p.predAbove i.rev).rev := by
obtain h | h := (rev i).succ_le_or_le_castSucc p
· rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ h, rev_pred,
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (rev_succ _ ▸ (le_rev_iff.mpr h)), castPred_inj, rev_rev]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, rev_castPred,
predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (rev_castSucc _ ▸ (rev_le_iff.mpr h)), pred_inj, rev_rev]
lemma predAbove_rev_right (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
p.predAbove i.rev = (p.rev.predAbove i).rev := by rw [predAbove_rev_left, rev_rev]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
#align fin.pred_above_zero Fin.predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
#align fin.pred_above_last_apply Fin.predAbove_last_apply
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
#align fin.succ_above_pred_above Fin.succAbove_predAbove
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ $ Fin.le_of_lt h]
#align fin.pred_above_succ_above Fin.predAbove_succAbove
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
#align fin.succ_pred_above_succ Fin.succ_predAbove_succ
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
/-- `rev` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
lemma rev_predAbove {n : ℕ} (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(predAbove p i).rev = predAbove p.rev i.rev := by rw [predAbove_rev_left, rev_rev]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
#align fin.div_nat Fin.divNat
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
#align fin.coe_div_nat Fin.coe_divNat
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
#align fin.mod_nat Fin.modNat
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
#align fin.coe_mod_nat Fin.coe_modNat
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
_ = n - (i % n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; exact i.modNat.rev.is_lt
end DivMod
section Rec
/-!
### recursion and induction principles
-/
#align fin.succ_rec Fin.succRec
#align fin.succ_rec_on Fin.succRecOn
#align fin.succ_rec_on_zero Fin.succRecOn_zero
#align fin.succ_rec_on_succ Fin.succRecOn_succ
#align fin.induction Fin.induction
#align fin.induction_zero Fin.induction_zero
#align fin.induction_succ Fin.induction_succ
#align fin.induction_on Fin.inductionOn
#align fin.cases Fin.cases
#align fin.cases_zero Fin.cases_zero
#align fin.cases_succ Fin.cases_succ
#align fin.cases_succ' Fin.cases_succ'
#align fin.forall_fin_succ Fin.forall_fin_succ
#align fin.exists_fin_succ Fin.exists_fin_succ
#align fin.forall_fin_one Fin.forall_fin_one
#align fin.exists_fin_one Fin.exists_fin_one
#align fin.forall_fin_two Fin.forall_fin_two
#align fin.exists_fin_two Fin.exists_fin_two
#align fin.fin_two_eq_of_eq_zero_iff Fin.fin_two_eq_of_eq_zero_iff
#align fin.reverse_induction Fin.reverseInduction
#align fin.reverse_induction_last Fin.reverseInduction_last
#align fin.reverse_induction_cast_succ Fin.reverseInduction_castSucc
#align fin.last_cases Fin.lastCases
#align fin.last_cases_last Fin.lastCases_last
#align fin.last_cases_cast_succ Fin.lastCases_castSucc
#align fin.add_cases Fin.addCases
#align fin.add_cases_left Fin.addCases_left
#align fin.add_cases_right Fin.addCases_right
end Rec
theorem liftFun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} :
((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f ↔ ∀ i : Fin n, r (f (castSucc i)) (f i.succ) := by
constructor
· intro H i
exact H i.castSucc_lt_succ
· refine fun H i => Fin.induction (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· simp [le_def] at h
· intro j ihj hij
rw [← le_castSucc_iff] at hij
obtain hij | hij := (le_def.1 hij).eq_or_lt
· obtain rfl := ext hij
exact H _
· exact _root_.trans (ihj hij) (H j)
#align fin.lift_fun_iff_succ Fin.liftFun_iff_succ
section AddGroup
open Nat Int
/-- Negation on `Fin n` -/
instance neg (n : ℕ) : Neg (Fin n) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩⟩
protected theorem coe_neg (a : Fin n) : ((-a : Fin n) : ℕ) = (n - a) % n :=
rfl
#align fin.coe_neg Fin.coe_neg
#align fin.coe_sub Fin.coe_sub
theorem eq_zero (n : Fin 1) : n = 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align fin.eq_zero Fin.eq_zero
instance uniqueFinOne : Unique (Fin 1) where
uniq _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,865 | 1,865 | theorem coe_fin_one (a : Fin 1) : (a : ℕ) = 0 := by | simp [Subsingleton.elim a 0]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.CompleteLinearOrder
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.SchroederBernstein
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Cardinal Numbers
We define cardinal numbers as a quotient of types under the equivalence relation of equinumerity.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal` is the type of cardinal numbers (in a given universe).
* `Cardinal.mk α` or `#α` is the cardinality of `α`. The notation `#` lives in the locale
`Cardinal`.
* Addition `c₁ + c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.add_def α β : #α + #β = #(α ⊕ β)`.
* Multiplication `c₁ * c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.mul_def : #α * #β = #(α × β)`.
* The order `c₁ ≤ c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.le_def α β : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β)`.
* Exponentiation `c₁ ^ c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.power_def α β : #α ^ #β = #(β → α)`.
* `Cardinal.isLimit c` means that `c` is a (weak) limit cardinal: `c ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x < c, succ x < c`.
* `Cardinal.aleph0` or `ℵ₀` is the cardinality of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`Cardinal.aleph0.{u} : Cardinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific
universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `Cardinal.sum` is the sum of an indexed family of cardinals, i.e. the cardinality of the
corresponding sigma type.
* `Cardinal.prod` is the product of an indexed family of cardinals, i.e. the cardinality of the
corresponding pi type.
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## Main instances
* Cardinals form a `CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring` with the aforementioned sum and product.
* Cardinals form a `SuccOrder`. Use `Order.succ c` for the smallest cardinal greater than `c`.
* The less than relation on cardinals forms a well-order.
* Cardinals form a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot`. Bounded sets for cardinals in universe
`u` are precisely the sets indexed by some type in universe `u`, see
`Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small`. One can use `sSup` for the cardinal supremum, and `sInf` for the
minimum of a set of cardinals.
## Main Statements
* Cantor's theorem: `Cardinal.cantor c : c < 2 ^ c`.
* König's theorem: `Cardinal.sum_lt_prod`
## Implementation notes
* There is a type of cardinal numbers in every universe level:
`Cardinal.{u} : Type (u + 1)` is the quotient of types in `Type u`.
The operation `Cardinal.lift` lifts cardinal numbers to a higher level.
* Cardinal arithmetic specifically for infinite cardinals (like `κ * κ = κ`) is in the file
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean`.
* There is an instance `Pow Cardinal`, but this will only fire if Lean already knows that both
the base and the exponent live in the same universe. As a workaround, you can add
```
local infixr:80 " ^' " => @HPow.hPow Cardinal Cardinal Cardinal _
```
to a file. This notation will work even if Lean doesn't know yet that the base and the exponent
live in the same universe (but no exponents in other types can be used).
(Porting note: This last point might need to be updated.)
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
open scoped Classical
open Function Set Order
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {α β : Type u}
/-- The equivalence relation on types given by equivalence (bijective correspondence) of types.
Quotienting by this equivalence relation gives the cardinal numbers.
-/
instance Cardinal.isEquivalent : Setoid (Type u) where
r α β := Nonempty (α ≃ β)
iseqv := ⟨
fun α => ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩,
fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩,
fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align cardinal.is_equivalent Cardinal.isEquivalent
/-- `Cardinal.{u}` is the type of cardinal numbers in `Type u`,
defined as the quotient of `Type u` by existence of an equivalence
(a bijection with explicit inverse). -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Cardinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Cardinal.isEquivalent
#align cardinal Cardinal
namespace Cardinal
/-- The cardinal number of a type -/
def mk : Type u → Cardinal :=
Quotient.mk'
#align cardinal.mk Cardinal.mk
@[inherit_doc]
scoped prefix:max "#" => Cardinal.mk
instance canLiftCardinalType : CanLift Cardinal.{u} (Type u) mk fun _ => True :=
⟨fun c _ => Quot.inductionOn c fun α => ⟨α, rfl⟩⟩
#align cardinal.can_lift_cardinal_Type Cardinal.canLiftCardinalType
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : Cardinal → Prop} (c : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α, p #α) : p c :=
Quotient.inductionOn c h
#align cardinal.induction_on Cardinal.inductionOn
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(h : ∀ α β, p #α #β) : p c₁ c₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ c₁ c₂ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₂ Cardinal.inductionOn₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(c₃ : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α β γ, p #α #β #γ) : p c₁ c₂ c₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ c₁ c₂ c₃ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₃ Cardinal.inductionOn₃
protected theorem eq : #α = #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align cardinal.eq Cardinal.eq
@[simp]
theorem mk'_def (α : Type u) : @Eq Cardinal ⟦α⟧ #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_def Cardinal.mk'_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (c : Cardinal) : #c.out = c :=
Quotient.out_eq _
#align cardinal.mk_out Cardinal.mk_out
/-- The representative of the cardinal of a type is equivalent to the original type. -/
def outMkEquiv {α : Type v} : (#α).out ≃ α :=
Nonempty.some <| Cardinal.eq.mp (by simp)
#align cardinal.out_mk_equiv Cardinal.outMkEquiv
theorem mk_congr (e : α ≃ β) : #α = #β :=
Quot.sound ⟨e⟩
#align cardinal.mk_congr Cardinal.mk_congr
alias _root_.Equiv.cardinal_eq := mk_congr
#align equiv.cardinal_eq Equiv.cardinal_eq
/-- Lift a function between `Type*`s to a function between `Cardinal`s. -/
def map (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} :=
Quotient.map f fun α β ⟨e⟩ => ⟨hf α β e⟩
#align cardinal.map Cardinal.map
@[simp]
theorem map_mk (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) (α : Type u) :
map f hf #α = #(f α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.map_mk Cardinal.map_mk
/-- Lift a binary operation `Type* → Type* → Type*` to a binary operation on `Cardinal`s. -/
def map₂ (f : Type u → Type v → Type w) (hf : ∀ α β γ δ, α ≃ β → γ ≃ δ → f α γ ≃ f β δ) :
Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{w} :=
Quotient.map₂ f fun α β ⟨e₁⟩ γ δ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨hf α β γ δ e₁ e₂⟩
#align cardinal.map₂ Cardinal.map₂
/-- The universe lift operation on cardinals. You can specify the universes explicitly with
`lift.{u v} : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v u}` -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (c : Cardinal.{v}) : Cardinal.{max v u} :=
map ULift.{u, v} (fun _ _ e => Equiv.ulift.trans <| e.trans Equiv.ulift.symm) c
#align cardinal.lift Cardinal.lift
@[simp]
theorem mk_uLift (α) : #(ULift.{v, u} α) = lift.{v} #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_ulift Cardinal.mk_uLift
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a => inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_umax Cardinal.lift_umax
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- `lift.{max v u, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{max v u, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
lift_umax
#align cardinal.lift_umax' Cardinal.lift_umax'
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- A cardinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_id' (a : Cardinal.{max u v}) : lift.{u} a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_congr Equiv.ulift
#align cardinal.lift_id' Cardinal.lift_id'
/-- A cardinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id (a : Cardinal) : lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_id Cardinal.lift_id
/-- A cardinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id'.{0, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_uzero Cardinal.lift_uzero
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift.{u_1} (a : Cardinal.{u_1}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_lift Cardinal.lift_lift
/-- We define the order on cardinal numbers by `#α ≤ #β` if and only if
there exists an embedding (injective function) from α to β. -/
instance : LE Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun q₁ q₂ =>
Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ (fun α β => Nonempty <| α ↪ β) fun _ _ _ _ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ =>
propext ⟨fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁ e₂⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁.symm e₂.symm⟩⟩⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Cardinal.{u} where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.refl _⟩
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact Quotient.sound (e₁.antisymm e₂)
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.partialOrder with
le_total := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩
apply Embedding.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem le_def (α β : Type u) : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align cardinal.le_def Cardinal.le_def
theorem mk_le_of_injective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_injective Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.cardinal_le {α β : Type u} (f : α ↪ β) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨f⟩
#align function.embedding.cardinal_le Function.Embedding.cardinal_le
theorem mk_le_of_surjective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : #β ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.ofSurjective f hf⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective Cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_set {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} : c ≤ #α ↔ ∃ p : Set α, #p = c :=
⟨inductionOn c fun _ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ => ⟨Set.range f, (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).cardinal_eq.symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨⟨Subtype.val, fun _ _ => Subtype.eq⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set Cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set
theorem mk_subtype_le {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : #(Subtype p) ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.subtype p⟩
#align cardinal.mk_subtype_le Cardinal.mk_subtype_le
theorem mk_set_le (s : Set α) : #s ≤ #α :=
mk_subtype_le s
#align cardinal.mk_set_le Cardinal.mk_set_le
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
theorem out_embedding {c c' : Cardinal} : c ≤ c' ↔ Nonempty (c.out ↪ c'.out) := by
trans
· rw [← Quotient.out_eq c, ← Quotient.out_eq c']
· rw [mk'_def, mk'_def, le_def]
#align cardinal.out_embedding Cardinal.out_embedding
theorem lift_mk_le {α : Type v} {β : Type w} :
lift.{max u w} #α ≤ lift.{max u v} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift.symm Equiv.ulift.symm f⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.lift_mk_le` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_le' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
lift_mk_le.{0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le' Cardinal.lift_mk_le'
theorem lift_mk_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{max v w} #α = lift.{max u w} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'.trans
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Equiv.ulift.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift.symm⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq Cardinal.lift_mk_eq
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.lift_mk_eq` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_eq' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α = lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
lift_mk_eq.{u, v, 0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq' Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_mk_le.{u}
#align cardinal.lift_le Cardinal.lift_le
-- Porting note: changed `simps` to `simps!` because the linter told to do so.
/-- `Cardinal.lift` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
@[simps! (config := .asFn)]
def liftOrderEmbedding : Cardinal.{v} ↪o Cardinal.{max v u} :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff lift.{u, v} fun _ _ => lift_le
#align cardinal.lift_order_embedding Cardinal.liftOrderEmbedding
theorem lift_injective : Injective lift.{u, v} :=
liftOrderEmbedding.injective
#align cardinal.lift_injective Cardinal.lift_injective
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a = lift.{v, u} b ↔ a = b :=
lift_injective.eq_iff
#align cardinal.lift_inj Cardinal.lift_inj
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a < lift.{v, u} b ↔ a < b :=
liftOrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt
#align cardinal.lift_lt Cardinal.lift_lt
theorem lift_strictMono : StrictMono lift := fun _ _ => lift_lt.2
#align cardinal.lift_strict_mono Cardinal.lift_strictMono
theorem lift_monotone : Monotone lift :=
lift_strictMono.monotone
#align cardinal.lift_monotone Cardinal.lift_monotone
instance : Zero Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PEmpty` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 0)⟩
instance : Inhabited Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero (α : Type u) [IsEmpty α] : #α = 0 :=
(Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero Cardinal.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
#align cardinal.lift_zero Cardinal.lift_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_zero {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_zero
#align cardinal.lift_eq_zero Cardinal.lift_eq_zero
theorem mk_eq_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun e =>
let ⟨h⟩ := Quotient.exact e
h.isEmpty,
@mk_eq_zero α⟩
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff
theorem mk_ne_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α :=
(not_iff_not.2 mk_eq_zero_iff).trans not_isEmpty_iff
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_ne_zero (α : Type u) [Nonempty α] : #α ≠ 0 :=
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero Cardinal.mk_ne_zero
instance : One Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PUnit` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 1)⟩
instance : Nontrivial Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, mk_ne_zero _⟩⟩
theorem mk_eq_one (α : Type u) [Unique α] : #α = 1 :=
(Equiv.equivOfUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_one Cardinal.mk_eq_one
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
#align cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton Cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
#align set.subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one
instance : Add Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Sum fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.sumCongr⟩
theorem add_def (α β : Type u) : #α + #β = #(Sum α β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.add_def Cardinal.add_def
instance : NatCast Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun n => lift #(Fin n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_sum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α ⊕ β) = lift.{v, u} #α + lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.sumCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_sum Cardinal.mk_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_option {α : Type u} : #(Option α) = #α + 1 := by
rw [(Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit.{u, u} α).cardinal_eq, mk_sum, mk_eq_one PUnit, lift_id, lift_id]
#align cardinal.mk_option Cardinal.mk_option
@[simp]
theorem mk_psum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(PSum α β) = lift.{v} #α + lift.{u} #β :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.psumEquivSum α β)).trans (mk_sum α β)
#align cardinal.mk_psum Cardinal.mk_psum
@[simp]
theorem mk_fintype (α : Type u) [h : Fintype α] : #α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_congr (Fintype.equivOfCardEq (by simp))
protected theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} (Fin (n+1))) = # (ULift.{u} (Fin n)) + 1
rw [← mk_option, mk_fintype, mk_fintype]
simp only [Fintype.card_ulift, Fintype.card_fin, Fintype.card_option]
instance : Mul Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Prod fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.prodCongr⟩
theorem mul_def (α β : Type u) : #α * #β = #(α × β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mul_def Cardinal.mul_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_prod (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α × β) = lift.{v, u} #α * lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_prod Cardinal.mk_prod
private theorem mul_comm' (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : a * b = b * a :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodComm α β
/-- The cardinal exponential. `#α ^ #β` is the cardinal of `β → α`. -/
instance instPowCardinal : Pow Cardinal.{u} Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ (fun α β => β → α) fun _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂ => e₂.arrowCongr e₁⟩
theorem power_def (α β : Type u) : #α ^ #β = #(β → α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.power_def Cardinal.power_def
theorem mk_arrow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α → β) = (lift.{u} #β^lift.{v} #α) :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_arrow Cardinal.mk_arrow
@[simp]
theorem lift_power (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a ^ b) = lift.{v} a ^ lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.ulift.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_power Cardinal.lift_power
@[simp]
theorem power_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.power_zero Cardinal.power_zero
@[simp]
theorem power_one {a : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^ (1 : Cardinal) = a :=
inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr (Equiv.funUnique (ULift.{u} (Fin 1)) α)
#align cardinal.power_one Cardinal.power_one
theorem power_add {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow β γ α
#align cardinal.power_add Cardinal.power_add
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Cardinal.{u} where
zero := 0
one := 1
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
zero_add a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.emptySum (ULift (Fin 0)) α
add_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))
add_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumAssoc α β γ
add_comm a b := inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumComm α β
zero_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
mul_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
one_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.uniqueProd α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_one a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ
mul_comm := mul_comm'
left_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodSumDistrib α β γ
right_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumProdDistrib α β γ
nsmul := nsmulRec
npow n c := c ^ (n : Cardinal)
npow_zero := @power_zero
npow_succ n c := show c ^ (↑(n + 1) : Cardinal) = c ^ (↑n : Cardinal) * c
by rw [Cardinal.cast_succ, power_add, power_one, mul_comm']
natCast := (fun n => lift.{u} #(Fin n) : ℕ → Cardinal.{u})
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := Cardinal.cast_succ
/-! Porting note (#11229): Deprecated section. Remove. -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem power_bit0 (a b : Cardinal) : a ^ bit0 b = a ^ b * a ^ b :=
power_add
#align cardinal.power_bit0 Cardinal.power_bit0
@[deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem power_bit1 (a b : Cardinal) : a ^ bit1 b = a ^ b * a ^ b * a := by
rw [bit1, ← power_bit0, power_add, power_one]
#align cardinal.power_bit1 Cardinal.power_bit1
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem one_power {a : Cardinal} : (1 : Cardinal) ^ a = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.one_power Cardinal.one_power
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_bool : #Bool = 2 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_bool Cardinal.mk_bool
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_Prop : #Prop = 2 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_Prop Cardinal.mk_Prop
@[simp]
theorem zero_power {a : Cardinal} : a ≠ 0 → (0 : Cardinal) ^ a = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun _ heq =>
mk_eq_zero_iff.2 <|
isEmpty_pi.2 <|
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 heq
⟨a, inferInstance⟩
#align cardinal.zero_power Cardinal.zero_power
theorem power_ne_zero {a : Cardinal} (b : Cardinal) : a ≠ 0 → a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ h =>
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 h
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ⟨fun _ => a⟩
#align cardinal.power_ne_zero Cardinal.power_ne_zero
theorem mul_power {a b c : Cardinal} : (a * b) ^ c = a ^ c * b ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow α β γ
#align cardinal.mul_power Cardinal.mul_power
theorem power_mul {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
rw [mul_comm b c]
exact inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.curry γ β α
#align cardinal.power_mul Cardinal.power_mul
@[simp]
theorem pow_cast_right (a : Cardinal.{u}) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (↑n : Cardinal.{u}) = a ^ n :=
rfl
#align cardinal.pow_cast_right Cardinal.pow_cast_right
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.lift_one Cardinal.lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_one {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a + b) = lift.{v} a + lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.sumCongr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_add Cardinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a * b) = lift.{v} a * lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.prodCongr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_mul Cardinal.lift_mul
/-! Porting note (#11229): Deprecated section. Remove. -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[simp, deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem lift_bit0 (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (bit0 a) = bit0 (lift.{v} a) :=
lift_add a a
#align cardinal.lift_bit0 Cardinal.lift_bit0
@[simp, deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem lift_bit1 (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (bit1 a) = bit1 (lift.{v} a) := by simp [bit1]
#align cardinal.lift_bit1 Cardinal.lift_bit1
end deprecated
-- Porting note: Proof used to be simp, needed to remind simp that 1 + 1 = 2
theorem lift_two : lift.{u, v} 2 = 2 := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two Cardinal.lift_two
@[simp]
theorem mk_set {α : Type u} : #(Set α) = 2 ^ #α := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two, Set, mk_arrow]
#align cardinal.mk_set Cardinal.mk_set
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.mk_set` expressed in terms of a `Set` instead of a `Type`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_powerset {α : Type u} (s : Set α) : #(↥(𝒫 s)) = 2 ^ #(↥s) :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.Set.powerset s)).trans mk_set
#align cardinal.mk_powerset Cardinal.mk_powerset
theorem lift_two_power (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (2 ^ a) = 2 ^ lift.{v} a := by
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two_power Cardinal.lift_two_power
section OrderProperties
open Sum
protected theorem zero_le : ∀ a : Cardinal, 0 ≤ a := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.ofIsEmpty⟩
#align cardinal.zero_le Cardinal.zero_le
private theorem add_le_add' : ∀ {a b c d : Cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a + c ≤ b + d := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.sumMap e₂⟩
-- #align cardinal.add_le_add' Cardinal.add_le_add'
instance add_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => add_le_add' le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_covariant_class Cardinal.add_covariantClass
instance add_swap_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h => add_le_add' h le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_swap_covariant_class Cardinal.add_swap_covariantClass
instance canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring : CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.partialOrder with
bot := 0
bot_le := Cardinal.zero_le
add_le_add_left := fun a b => add_le_add_left
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
have : Sum α ((range f)ᶜ : Set β) ≃ β :=
(Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.ofInjective f hf) (Equiv.refl _)).trans <|
Equiv.Set.sumCompl (range f)
⟨#(↥(range f)ᶜ), mk_congr this.symm⟩
le_self_add := fun a b => (add_zero a).ge.trans <| add_le_add_left (Cardinal.zero_le _) _
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
simpa only [mul_def, mk_eq_zero_iff, isEmpty_prod] using id }
instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Cardinal.linearOrder with }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.linearOrder with
mul_le_mul_left := @mul_le_mul_left' _ _ _ _
zero_le_one := zero_le _ }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
-- Porting note: new
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
theorem zero_power_le (c : Cardinal.{u}) : (0 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ c ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : c = 0
· rw [h, power_zero]
· rw [zero_power h]
apply zero_le
#align cardinal.zero_power_le Cardinal.zero_power_le
theorem power_le_power_left : ∀ {a b c : Cardinal}, a ≠ 0 → b ≤ c → a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ hα ⟨e⟩
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 hα
exact ⟨@Function.Embedding.arrowCongrLeft _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_left Cardinal.power_le_power_left
theorem self_le_power (a : Cardinal) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact zero_le _
· convert power_le_power_left ha hb
exact power_one.symm
#align cardinal.self_le_power Cardinal.self_le_power
/-- **Cantor's theorem** -/
theorem cantor (a : Cardinal.{u}) : a < 2 ^ a := by
induction' a using Cardinal.inductionOn with α
rw [← mk_set]
refine ⟨⟨⟨singleton, fun a b => singleton_eq_singleton_iff.1⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
exact cantor_injective f hf
#align cardinal.cantor Cardinal.cantor
instance : NoMaxOrder Cardinal.{u} where exists_gt a := ⟨_, cantor a⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : DistribLattice Cardinal.{u} := inferInstance
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
#align cardinal.one_lt_iff_nontrivial Cardinal.one_lt_iff_nontrivial
theorem power_le_max_power_one {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ max (a ^ c) 1 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha, zero_power_le]
· exact (power_le_power_left ha h).trans (le_max_left _ _)
#align cardinal.power_le_max_power_one Cardinal.power_le_max_power_one
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : Cardinal} : a ≤ b → a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨Embedding.arrowCongrRight e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_right Cardinal.power_le_power_right
theorem power_pos {a : Cardinal} (b : Cardinal) (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
(power_ne_zero _ ha.ne').bot_lt
#align cardinal.power_pos Cardinal.power_pos
end OrderProperties
protected theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Cardinal.{u} (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a =>
by_contradiction fun h => by
let ι := { c : Cardinal // ¬Acc (· < ·) c }
let f : ι → Cardinal := Subtype.val
haveI hι : Nonempty ι := ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
obtain ⟨⟨c : Cardinal, hc : ¬Acc (· < ·) c⟩, ⟨h_1 : ∀ j, (f ⟨c, hc⟩).out ↪ (f j).out⟩⟩ :=
Embedding.min_injective fun i => (f i).out
refine hc (Acc.intro _ fun j h' => by_contradiction fun hj => h'.2 ?_)
have : #_ ≤ #_ := ⟨h_1 ⟨j, hj⟩⟩
simpa only [mk_out] using this⟩
#align cardinal.lt_wf Cardinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨(· < ·), Cardinal.lt_wf⟩
-- Porting note: this no longer is automatically inferred.
instance : WellFoundedLT Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨Cardinal.lt_wf⟩
instance wo : @IsWellOrder Cardinal.{u} (· < ·) where
#align cardinal.wo Cardinal.wo
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Cardinal :=
IsWellOrder.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Cardinal.{u}) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
#align cardinal.Inf_empty Cardinal.sInf_empty
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- Note that the successor of `c` is not the same as `c + 1` except in the case of finite `c`. -/
instance : SuccOrder Cardinal :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun c => sInf { c' | c < c' })
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `by apply` in the next line
⟨by apply lt_of_lt_of_le <| csInf_mem <| exists_gt _,
-- Porting note used to be just `csInf_le'`
fun h ↦ csInf_le' h⟩
theorem succ_def (c : Cardinal) : succ c = sInf { c' | c < c' } :=
rfl
#align cardinal.succ_def Cardinal.succ_def
theorem succ_pos : ∀ c : Cardinal, 0 < succ c :=
bot_lt_succ
#align cardinal.succ_pos Cardinal.succ_pos
theorem succ_ne_zero (c : Cardinal) : succ c ≠ 0 :=
(succ_pos _).ne'
#align cardinal.succ_ne_zero Cardinal.succ_ne_zero
theorem add_one_le_succ (c : Cardinal.{u}) : c + 1 ≤ succ c := by
-- Porting note: rewrote the next three lines to avoid defeq abuse.
have : Set.Nonempty { c' | c < c' } := exists_gt c
simp_rw [succ_def, le_csInf_iff'' this, mem_setOf]
intro b hlt
rcases b, c with ⟨⟨β⟩, ⟨γ⟩⟩
cases' le_of_lt hlt with f
have : ¬Surjective f := fun hn => (not_le_of_lt hlt) (mk_le_of_surjective hn)
simp only [Surjective, not_forall] at this
rcases this with ⟨b, hb⟩
calc
#γ + 1 = #(Option γ) := mk_option.symm
_ ≤ #β := (f.optionElim b hb).cardinal_le
#align cardinal.add_one_le_succ Cardinal.add_one_le_succ
/-- A cardinal is a limit if it is not zero or a successor cardinal. Note that `ℵ₀` is a limit
cardinal by this definition, but `0` isn't.
Use `IsSuccLimit` if you want to include the `c = 0` case. -/
def IsLimit (c : Cardinal) : Prop :=
c ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccLimit c
#align cardinal.is_limit Cardinal.IsLimit
protected theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {c} (h : IsLimit c) : c ≠ 0 :=
h.1
#align cardinal.is_limit.ne_zero Cardinal.IsLimit.ne_zero
protected theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {c} (h : IsLimit c) : IsSuccLimit c :=
h.2
#align cardinal.is_limit.is_succ_limit Cardinal.IsLimit.isSuccLimit
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {x c} (h : IsLimit c) : x < c → succ x < c :=
h.isSuccLimit.succ_lt
#align cardinal.is_limit.succ_lt Cardinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Cardinal) :=
isSuccLimit_bot
#align cardinal.is_succ_limit_zero Cardinal.isSuccLimit_zero
/-- The indexed sum of cardinals is the cardinality of the
indexed disjoint union, i.e. sigma type. -/
def sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : Cardinal :=
mk (Σi, (f i).out)
#align cardinal.sum Cardinal.sum
theorem le_sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sum f := by
rw [← Quotient.out_eq (f i)]
exact ⟨⟨fun a => ⟨i, a⟩, fun a b h => by injection h⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_sum Cardinal.le_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_sigma {ι} (f : ι → Type*) : #(Σ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
mk_congr <| Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun _ => outMkEquiv.symm
#align cardinal.mk_sigma Cardinal.mk_sigma
@[simp]
theorem sum_const (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{v}) :
(sum fun _ : ι => a) = lift.{v} #ι * lift.{u} a :=
inductionOn a fun α =>
mk_congr <|
calc
(Σ _ : ι, Quotient.out #α) ≃ ι × Quotient.out #α := Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _
_ ≃ ULift ι × ULift α := Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr (outMkEquiv.trans Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.sum_const Cardinal.sum_const
theorem sum_const' (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{u}) : (sum fun _ : ι => a) = #ι * a := by simp
#align cardinal.sum_const' Cardinal.sum_const'
@[simp]
theorem sum_add_distrib {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) : sum (f + g) = sum f + sum g := by
have := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib (Quotient.out ∘ f) (Quotient.out ∘ g))
simp only [comp_apply, mk_sigma, mk_sum, mk_out, lift_id] at this
exact this
#align cardinal.sum_add_distrib Cardinal.sum_add_distrib
@[simp]
theorem sum_add_distrib' {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) :
(Cardinal.sum fun i => f i + g i) = sum f + sum g :=
sum_add_distrib f g
#align cardinal.sum_add_distrib' Cardinal.sum_add_distrib'
@[simp]
theorem lift_sum {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (Cardinal.sum f) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Cardinal.lift.{w} (f i) :=
Equiv.cardinal_eq <|
Equiv.ulift.trans <|
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun a =>
-- Porting note: Inserted universe hint .{_,_,v} below
Nonempty.some <| by rw [← lift_mk_eq.{_,_,v}, mk_out, mk_out, lift_lift]
#align cardinal.lift_sum Cardinal.lift_sum
theorem sum_le_sum {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sum f ≤ sum g :=
⟨(Embedding.refl _).sigmaMap fun i =>
Classical.choice <| by have := H i; rwa [← Quot.out_eq (f i), ← Quot.out_eq (g i)] at this⟩
#align cardinal.sum_le_sum Cardinal.sum_le_sum
theorem mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le {c : Cardinal} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ b : β, #(f ⁻¹' {b}) ≤ c) :
#α ≤ #β * c := by
simpa only [← mk_congr (@Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv α β f), mk_sigma, ← sum_const'] using
sum_le_sum _ _ hf
#align cardinal.mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le Cardinal.mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le
theorem lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {c : Cardinal}
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ b : β, lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' {b}) ≤ c) : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β * c :=
(mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le fun x : ULift.{v} α => ULift.up.{u} (f x.1)) <|
ULift.forall.2 fun b =>
(mk_congr <|
(Equiv.ulift.image _).trans
(Equiv.trans
(by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage]
/- Porting note: Need to insert the following `have` b/c bad fun coercion
behaviour for Equivs -/
have : DFunLike.coe (Equiv.symm (Equiv.ulift (α := α))) = ULift.up (α := α) := rfl
rw [this]
simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, ULift.up_inj, mem_setOf_eq, coe_setOf]
exact Equiv.refl _)
Equiv.ulift.symm)).trans_le
(hf b)
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le
/-- The range of an indexed cardinal function, whose outputs live in a higher universe than the
inputs, is always bounded above. -/
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
⟨_, by
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: Added universe reference below
exact le_sum.{v,u} f i⟩
#align cardinal.bdd_above_range Cardinal.bddAbove_range
instance (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio a) :=
small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun x h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
suffices (range fun x : ι => (e.symm x).1) = s by
rw [← this]
apply bddAbove_range.{u, u}
ext x
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨e ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact (e.symm a).2
· simp_rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]⟩
#align cardinal.bdd_above_iff_small Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
#align cardinal.bdd_above_of_small Cardinal.bddAbove_of_small
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
-- Porting note: added universes below
exact small_lift.{_,v,_} _
#align cardinal.bdd_above_image Cardinal.bddAbove_image
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image.{v,w} g hf
#align cardinal.bdd_above_range_comp Cardinal.bddAbove_range_comp
theorem iSup_le_sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : iSup f ≤ sum f :=
ciSup_le' <| le_sum.{u_2,u_1} _
#align cardinal.supr_le_sum Cardinal.iSup_le_sum
-- Porting note: Added universe hint .{v,_} below
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v,_} #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_range.{u, v} f)
#align cardinal.sum_le_supr_lift Cardinal.sum_le_iSup_lift
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
#align cardinal.sum_le_supr Cardinal.sum_le_iSup
theorem sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ (f : ℕ → Cardinal.{u}) :
Cardinal.sum f = f 0 + Cardinal.sum fun i => f (i + 1) := by
refine (Equiv.sigmaNatSucc fun i => Quotient.out (f i)).cardinal_eq.trans ?_
simp only [mk_sum, mk_out, lift_id, mk_sigma]
#align cardinal.sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ Cardinal.sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ
-- Porting note: LFS is not in normal form.
-- @[simp]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
#align cardinal.supr_of_empty Cardinal.iSup_of_empty
lemma exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit
{ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) (ω : Cardinal.{v})
(hω : ¬ Order.IsSuccLimit ω)
(h : ⨆ i : ι, f i = ω) : ∃ i, f i = ω := by
subst h
refine (isLUB_csSup' ?_).exists_of_not_isSuccLimit hω
contrapose! hω with hf
rw [iSup, csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf, csSup_empty]
exact Order.isSuccLimit_bot
lemma exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isLimit
{ι : Type u} [hι : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(ω : Cardinal.{v}) (hω : ¬ ω.IsLimit)
(h : ⨆ i : ι, f i = ω) : ∃ i, f i = ω := by
refine (not_and_or.mp hω).elim (fun e ↦ ⟨hι.some, ?_⟩)
(Cardinal.exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f ω · h)
cases not_not.mp e
rw [← le_zero_iff] at h ⊢
exact (le_ciSup hf _).trans h
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
-- Porting note: Added .{v,u,w} universe hint below
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink' Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink'
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax', lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink'' Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink''
/-- The indexed product of cardinals is the cardinality of the Pi type
(dependent product). -/
def prod {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal) : Cardinal :=
#(∀ i, (f i).out)
#align cardinal.prod Cardinal.prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_pi {ι : Type u} (α : ι → Type v) : #(∀ i, α i) = prod fun i => #(α i) :=
mk_congr <| Equiv.piCongrRight fun _ => outMkEquiv.symm
#align cardinal.mk_pi Cardinal.mk_pi
@[simp]
theorem prod_const (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{v}) :
(prod fun _ : ι => a) = lift.{u} a ^ lift.{v} #ι :=
inductionOn a fun _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.piCongr Equiv.ulift.symm fun _ => outMkEquiv.trans Equiv.ulift.symm
#align cardinal.prod_const Cardinal.prod_const
theorem prod_const' (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{u}) : (prod fun _ : ι => a) = a ^ #ι :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (mk_pi _).symm
#align cardinal.prod_const' Cardinal.prod_const'
theorem prod_le_prod {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : prod f ≤ prod g :=
⟨Embedding.piCongrRight fun i =>
Classical.choice <| by have := H i; rwa [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)] at this⟩
#align cardinal.prod_le_prod Cardinal.prod_le_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_zero {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : prod f = 0 ↔ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
lift f to ι → Type u using fun _ => trivial
simp only [mk_eq_zero_iff, ← mk_pi, isEmpty_pi]
#align cardinal.prod_eq_zero Cardinal.prod_eq_zero
theorem prod_ne_zero {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : prod f ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i ≠ 0 := by simp [prod_eq_zero]
#align cardinal.prod_ne_zero Cardinal.prod_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_prod {ι : Type u} (c : ι → Cardinal.{v}) :
lift.{w} (prod c) = prod fun i => lift.{w} (c i) := by
lift c to ι → Type v using fun _ => trivial
simp only [← mk_pi, ← mk_uLift]
exact mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.piCongrRight fun i => Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.lift_prod Cardinal.lift_prod
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax'.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
#align cardinal.prod_eq_of_fintype Cardinal.prod_eq_of_fintype
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u,v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u,v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
#align cardinal.lift_Inf Cardinal.lift_sInf
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u,v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u,v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
#align cardinal.lift_infi Cardinal.lift_iInf
theorem lift_down {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a → ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_id #β, ← lift_umax, ← lift_umax.{u, v}, lift_mk_le.{v}]
exact fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨#(Set.range f),
Eq.symm <| lift_mk_eq.{_, _, v}.2
⟨Function.Embedding.equivOfSurjective (Embedding.codRestrict _ f Set.mem_range_self)
fun ⟨a, ⟨b, e⟩⟩ => ⟨b, Subtype.eq e⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_down Cardinal.lift_down
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h
⟨a', e, lift_le.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
#align cardinal.le_lift_iff Cardinal.le_lift_iff
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h.le
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
#align cardinal.lt_lift_iff Cardinal.lt_lift_iff
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a) : lift.{v,u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{v,u} a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨b, e, h⟩
rw [lt_succ_iff, ← lift_le, e] at h
exact h.not_lt (lt_succ _))
(succ_le_of_lt <| lift_lt.2 <| lt_succ a)
#align cardinal.lift_succ Cardinal.lift_succ
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels.
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax_eq {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{v}} :
lift.{max v w} a = lift.{max u w} b ↔ lift.{v} a = lift.{u} b := by
rw [← lift_lift.{v, w, u}, ← lift_lift.{u, w, v}, lift_inj]
#align cardinal.lift_umax_eq Cardinal.lift_umax_eq
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_min {a b : Cardinal} : lift.{u,v} (min a b) = min (lift.{u,v} a) (lift.{u,v} b) :=
lift_monotone.map_min
#align cardinal.lift_min Cardinal.lift_min
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_max {a b : Cardinal} : lift.{u,v} (max a b) = max (lift.{u,v} a) (lift.{u,v} b) :=
lift_monotone.map_max
#align cardinal.lift_max Cardinal.lift_max
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.lift_down (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
#align cardinal.lift_Sup Cardinal.lift_sSup
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp]
#align cardinal.lift_supr Cardinal.lift_iSup
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le Cardinal.lift_iSup_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le_iff Cardinal.lift_iSup_le_iff
universe v' w'
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le_lift_supr Cardinal.lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
#align cardinal.lift_supr_le_lift_supr' Cardinal.lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup'
/-- `ℵ₀` is the smallest infinite cardinal. -/
def aleph0 : Cardinal.{u} :=
lift #ℕ
#align cardinal.aleph_0 Cardinal.aleph0
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ℵ₀" => Cardinal.aleph0
theorem mk_nat : #ℕ = ℵ₀ :=
(lift_id _).symm
#align cardinal.mk_nat Cardinal.mk_nat
theorem aleph0_ne_zero : ℵ₀ ≠ 0 :=
mk_ne_zero _
#align cardinal.aleph_0_ne_zero Cardinal.aleph0_ne_zero
theorem aleph0_pos : 0 < ℵ₀ :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 aleph0_ne_zero
#align cardinal.aleph_0_pos Cardinal.aleph0_pos
@[simp]
theorem lift_aleph0 : lift ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
lift_lift _
#align cardinal.lift_aleph_0 Cardinal.lift_aleph0
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,291 | 1,292 | theorem aleph0_le_lift {c : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ lift.{v} c ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ c := by |
rw [← lift_aleph0.{u,v}, lift_le]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.IsPrimary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Quotient
#align_import ring_theory.jacobson_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"da420a8c6dd5bdfb85c4ced85c34388f633bc6ff"
/-!
# Jacobson radical
The Jacobson radical of a ring `R` is defined to be the intersection of all maximal ideals of `R`.
This is similar to how the nilradical is equal to the intersection of all prime ideals of `R`.
We can extend the idea of the nilradical to ideals of `R`,
by letting the radical of an ideal `I` be the intersection of prime ideals containing `I`.
Under this extension, the original nilradical is the radical of the zero ideal `⊥`.
Here we define the Jacobson radical of an ideal `I` in a similar way,
as the intersection of maximal ideals containing `I`.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring, and `I` be an ideal of `R`
* `Ideal.jacobson I` is the jacobson radical, i.e. the infimum of all maximal ideals containing I.
* `Ideal.IsLocal I` is the proposition that the jacobson radical of `I` is itself a maximal ideal
## Main statements
* `mem_jacobson_iff` gives a characterization of members of the jacobson of I
* `Ideal.isLocal_of_isMaximal_radical`: if the radical of I is maximal then so is the jacobson
radical
## Tags
Jacobson, Jacobson radical, Local Ideal
-/
universe u v
namespace Ideal
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
open Polynomial
section Jacobson
section Ring
variable [Ring R] [Ring S] {I : Ideal R}
/-- The Jacobson radical of `I` is the infimum of all maximal (left) ideals containing `I`. -/
def jacobson (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
sInf { J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ IsMaximal J }
#align ideal.jacobson Ideal.jacobson
theorem le_jacobson : I ≤ jacobson I := fun _ hx => mem_sInf.mpr fun _ hJ => hJ.left hx
#align ideal.le_jacobson Ideal.le_jacobson
@[simp]
theorem jacobson_idem : jacobson (jacobson I) = jacobson I :=
le_antisymm (sInf_le_sInf fun _ hJ => ⟨sInf_le hJ, hJ.2⟩) le_jacobson
#align ideal.jacobson_idem Ideal.jacobson_idem
@[simp]
theorem jacobson_top : jacobson (⊤ : Ideal R) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 le_jacobson
#align ideal.jacobson_top Ideal.jacobson_top
@[simp]
theorem jacobson_eq_top_iff : jacobson I = ⊤ ↔ I = ⊤ :=
⟨fun H =>
by_contradiction fun hi => let ⟨M, hm, him⟩ := exists_le_maximal I hi
lt_top_iff_ne_top.1
(lt_of_le_of_lt (show jacobson I ≤ M from sInf_le ⟨him, hm⟩) <|
lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hm.ne_top) H,
fun H => eq_top_iff.2 <| le_sInf fun _ ⟨hij, _⟩ => H ▸ hij⟩
#align ideal.jacobson_eq_top_iff Ideal.jacobson_eq_top_iff
theorem jacobson_eq_bot : jacobson I = ⊥ → I = ⊥ := fun h => eq_bot_iff.mpr (h ▸ le_jacobson)
#align ideal.jacobson_eq_bot Ideal.jacobson_eq_bot
theorem jacobson_eq_self_of_isMaximal [H : IsMaximal I] : I.jacobson = I :=
le_antisymm (sInf_le ⟨le_of_eq rfl, H⟩) le_jacobson
#align ideal.jacobson_eq_self_of_is_maximal Ideal.jacobson_eq_self_of_isMaximal
instance (priority := 100) jacobson.isMaximal [H : IsMaximal I] : IsMaximal (jacobson I) :=
⟨⟨fun htop => H.1.1 (jacobson_eq_top_iff.1 htop), fun _ hJ =>
H.1.2 _ (lt_of_le_of_lt le_jacobson hJ)⟩⟩
#align ideal.jacobson.is_maximal Ideal.jacobson.isMaximal
theorem mem_jacobson_iff {x : R} : x ∈ jacobson I ↔ ∀ y, ∃ z, z * y * x + z - 1 ∈ I :=
⟨fun hx y =>
by_cases
(fun hxy : I ⊔ span {y * x + 1} = ⊤ =>
let ⟨p, hpi, q, hq, hpq⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.1 ((eq_top_iff_one _).1 hxy)
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := mem_span_singleton'.1 hq
⟨r, by
-- Porting note: supply `mul_add_one` with explicit variables
rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_add_one r (y * x), hr, ← hpq, ← neg_sub, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact I.neg_mem hpi⟩)
fun hxy : I ⊔ span {y * x + 1} ≠ ⊤ => let ⟨M, hm1, hm2⟩ := exists_le_maximal _ hxy
suffices x ∉ M from (this <| mem_sInf.1 hx ⟨le_trans le_sup_left hm2, hm1⟩).elim
fun hxm => hm1.1.1 <| (eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| add_sub_cancel_left (y * x) 1 ▸
M.sub_mem (le_sup_right.trans hm2 <| subset_span rfl) (M.mul_mem_left _ hxm),
fun hx => mem_sInf.2 fun M ⟨him, hm⟩ => by_contradiction fun hxm =>
let ⟨y, i, hi, df⟩ := hm.exists_inv hxm
let ⟨z, hz⟩ := hx (-y)
hm.1.1 <| (eq_top_iff_one _).2 <| sub_sub_cancel (z * -y * x + z) 1 ▸
M.sub_mem (by
-- Porting note: supply `mul_add_one` with explicit variables
rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_add_one z, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mpr df.symm, neg_sub,
sub_add_cancel]
exact M.mul_mem_left _ hi) <| him hz⟩
#align ideal.mem_jacobson_iff Ideal.mem_jacobson_iff
theorem exists_mul_sub_mem_of_sub_one_mem_jacobson {I : Ideal R} (r : R) (h : r - 1 ∈ jacobson I) :
∃ s, s * r - 1 ∈ I := by
cases' mem_jacobson_iff.1 h 1 with s hs
use s
simpa [mul_sub] using hs
#align ideal.exists_mul_sub_mem_of_sub_one_mem_jacobson Ideal.exists_mul_sub_mem_of_sub_one_mem_jacobson
/-- An ideal equals its Jacobson radical iff it is the intersection of a set of maximal ideals.
Allowing the set to include ⊤ is equivalent, and is included only to simplify some proofs. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/JacobsonIdeal.lean | 134 | 143 | theorem eq_jacobson_iff_sInf_maximal :
I.jacobson = I ↔ ∃ M : Set (Ideal R), (∀ J ∈ M, IsMaximal J ∨ J = ⊤) ∧ I = sInf M := by |
use fun hI => ⟨{ J : Ideal R | I ≤ J ∧ J.IsMaximal }, ⟨fun _ hJ => Or.inl hJ.right, hI.symm⟩⟩
rintro ⟨M, hM, hInf⟩
refine le_antisymm (fun x hx => ?_) le_jacobson
rw [hInf, mem_sInf]
intro I hI
cases' hM I hI with is_max is_top
· exact (mem_sInf.1 hx) ⟨le_sInf_iff.1 (le_of_eq hInf) I hI, is_max⟩
· exact is_top.symm ▸ Submodule.mem_top
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
[`data.finset.sym`@`98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90`..`02ba8949f486ebecf93fe7460f1ed0564b5e442c`](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib-port-status/file/data/finset/sym?range=98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90..02ba8949f486ebecf93fe7460f1ed0564b5e442c)
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Vector
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sym
#align_import data.finset.sym from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"02ba8949f486ebecf93fe7460f1ed0564b5e442c"
/-!
# Symmetric powers of a finset
This file defines the symmetric powers of a finset as `Finset (Sym α n)` and `Finset (Sym2 α)`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.sym`: The symmetric power of a finset. `s.sym n` is all the multisets of cardinality `n`
whose elements are in `s`.
* `Finset.sym2`: The symmetric square of a finset. `s.sym2` is all the pairs whose elements are in
`s`.
* A `Fintype (Sym2 α)` instance that does not require `DecidableEq α`.
## TODO
`Finset.sym` forms a Galois connection between `Finset α` and `Finset (Sym α n)`. Similar for
`Finset.sym2`.
-/
namespace Finset
variable {α : Type*}
/-- `s.sym2` is the finset of all unordered pairs of elements from `s`.
It is the image of `s ×ˢ s` under the quotient `α × α → Sym2 α`. -/
@[simps]
protected def sym2 (s : Finset α) : Finset (Sym2 α) := ⟨s.1.sym2, s.2.sym2⟩
#align finset.sym2 Finset.sym2
section
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem mk_mem_sym2_iff : s(a, b) ∈ s.sym2 ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by
rw [mem_mk, sym2_val, Multiset.mk_mem_sym2_iff, mem_mk, mem_mk]
#align finset.mk_mem_sym2_iff Finset.mk_mem_sym2_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sym2_iff {m : Sym2 α} : m ∈ s.sym2 ↔ ∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ s := by
rw [mem_mk, sym2_val, Multiset.mem_sym2_iff]
simp only [mem_val]
#align finset.mem_sym2_iff Finset.mem_sym2_iff
instance _root_.Sym2.instFintype [Fintype α] : Fintype (Sym2 α) where
elems := Finset.univ.sym2
complete := fun x ↦ by rw [mem_sym2_iff]; exact (fun a _ ↦ mem_univ a)
-- Note(kmill): Using a default argument to make this simp lemma more general.
@[simp]
theorem sym2_univ [Fintype α] (inst : Fintype (Sym2 α) := Sym2.instFintype) :
(univ : Finset α).sym2 = univ := by
ext
simp only [mem_sym2_iff, mem_univ, implies_true]
#align finset.sym2_univ Finset.sym2_univ
@[simp, mono]
theorem sym2_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : s.sym2 ⊆ t.sym2 := by
rw [← val_le_iff, sym2_val, sym2_val]
apply Multiset.sym2_mono
rwa [val_le_iff]
#align finset.sym2_mono Finset.sym2_mono
theorem monotone_sym2 : Monotone (Finset.sym2 : Finset α → _) := fun _ _ => sym2_mono
theorem injective_sym2 : Function.Injective (Finset.sym2 : Finset α → _) := by
intro s t h
ext x
simpa using congr(s(x, x) ∈ $h)
theorem strictMono_sym2 : StrictMono (Finset.sym2 : Finset α → _) :=
monotone_sym2.strictMono_of_injective injective_sym2
theorem sym2_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) :
m.toFinset.sym2 = m.sym2.toFinset := by
ext z
refine z.ind fun x y ↦ ?_
simp only [mk_mem_sym2_iff, Multiset.mem_toFinset, Multiset.mk_mem_sym2_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sym2_empty : (∅ : Finset α).sym2 = ∅ := rfl
#align finset.sym2_empty Finset.sym2_empty
@[simp]
theorem sym2_eq_empty : s.sym2 = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← val_eq_zero, sym2_val, Multiset.sym2_eq_zero_iff, val_eq_zero]
#align finset.sym2_eq_empty Finset.sym2_eq_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem sym2_nonempty : s.sym2.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp_rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, sym2_eq_empty]
#align finset.sym2_nonempty Finset.sym2_nonempty
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.sym2⟩ := sym2_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.sym2 Finset.Nonempty.sym2
@[simp]
theorem sym2_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).sym2 = {Sym2.diag a} := rfl
#align finset.sym2_singleton Finset.sym2_singleton
/-- Finset **stars and bars** for the case `n = 2`. -/
theorem card_sym2 (s : Finset α) : s.sym2.card = Nat.choose (s.card + 1) 2 := by
rw [card_def, sym2_val, Multiset.card_sym2, ← card_def]
#align finset.card_sym2 Finset.card_sym2
end
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sym.lean | 122 | 133 | theorem sym2_eq_image : s.sym2 = (s ×ˢ s).image Sym2.mk := by |
ext z
refine z.ind fun x y ↦ ?_
rw [mk_mem_sym2_iff, mem_image]
constructor
· intro h
use (x, y)
simp only [mem_product, h, and_self, true_and]
· rintro ⟨⟨a, b⟩, h⟩
simp only [mem_product, Sym2.eq_iff] at h
obtain ⟨h, (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)⟩ := h
<;> simp [h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Pierre-Alexandre Bazin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pierre-Alexandre Bazin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Torsion
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.module.torsion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cdc34484a07418af43daf8198beaf5c00324bca8"
/-!
# Torsion submodules
## Main definitions
* `torsionOf R M x` : the torsion ideal of `x`, containing all `a` such that `a • x = 0`.
* `Submodule.torsionBy R M a` : the `a`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such
that `a • x = 0`.
* `Submodule.torsionBySet R M s` : the submodule containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0` for all `a` in `s`.
* `Submodule.torsion' R M S` : the `S`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such
that `a • x = 0` for some `a` in `S`.
* `Submodule.torsion R M` : the torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0` for some non-zero-divisor `a` in `R`.
* `Module.IsTorsionBy R M a` : the property that defines an `a`-torsion module. Similarly,
`IsTorsionBySet`, `IsTorsion'` and `IsTorsion`.
* `Module.IsTorsionBySet.module` : Creates an `R ⧸ I`-module from an `R`-module that
`IsTorsionBySet R _ I`.
## Main statements
* `quot_torsionOf_equiv_span_singleton` : isomorphism between the span of an element of `M` and
the quotient by its torsion ideal.
* `torsion' R M S` and `torsion R M` are submodules.
* `torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span` : torsion by a set is torsion by the ideal generated by it.
* `Submodule.torsionBy_is_torsionBy` : the `a`-torsion submodule is an `a`-torsion module.
Similar lemmas for `torsion'` and `torsion`.
* `Submodule.torsionBy_isInternal` : a `∏ i, p i`-torsion module is the internal direct sum of its
`p i`-torsion submodules when the `p i` are pairwise coprime. A more general version with coprime
ideals is `Submodule.torsionBySet_is_internal`.
* `Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors_iff_torsion_bot` : a module over a domain has
`NoZeroSMulDivisors` (that is, there is no non-zero `a`, `x` such that `a • x = 0`)
iff its torsion submodule is trivial.
* `Submodule.QuotientTorsion.torsion_eq_bot` : quotienting by the torsion submodule makes the
torsion submodule of the new module trivial. If `R` is a domain, we can derive an instance
`Submodule.QuotientTorsion.noZeroSMulDivisors : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (M ⧸ torsion R M)`.
## Notation
* The notions are defined for a `CommSemiring R` and a `Module R M`. Some additional hypotheses on
`R` and `M` are required by some lemmas.
* The letters `a`, `b`, ... are used for scalars (in `R`), while `x`, `y`, ... are used for vectors
(in `M`).
## Tags
Torsion, submodule, module, quotient
-/
namespace Ideal
section TorsionOf
variable (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- The torsion ideal of `x`, containing all `a` such that `a • x = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionOf (x : M) : Ideal R :=
-- Porting note (#11036): broken dot notation on LinearMap.ker Lean4#1910
LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x)
#align ideal.torsion_of Ideal.torsionOf
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_zero : torsionOf R M (0 : M) = ⊤ := by simp [torsionOf]
#align ideal.torsion_of_zero Ideal.torsionOf_zero
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionOf_iff (x : M) (a : R) : a ∈ torsionOf R M x ↔ a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_torsion_of_iff Ideal.mem_torsionOf_iff
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_eq_top_iff (m : M) : torsionOf R M m = ⊤ ↔ m = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
rw [← one_smul R m, ← mem_torsionOf_iff m (1 : R), h]
exact Submodule.mem_top
#align ideal.torsion_of_eq_top_iff Ideal.torsionOf_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_eq_bot_iff_of_noZeroSMulDivisors [Nontrivial R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (m : M) :
torsionOf R M m = ⊥ ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h contra => ?_, fun h => (Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr fun r hr => ?_⟩
· rw [contra, torsionOf_zero] at h
exact bot_ne_top.symm h
· rw [mem_torsionOf_iff, smul_eq_zero] at hr
tauto
#align ideal.torsion_of_eq_bot_iff_of_no_zero_smul_divisors Ideal.torsionOf_eq_bot_iff_of_noZeroSMulDivisors
/-- See also `CompleteLattice.Independent.linearIndependent` which provides the same conclusion
but requires the stronger hypothesis `NoZeroSMulDivisors R M`. -/
theorem CompleteLattice.Independent.linear_independent' {ι R M : Type*} {v : ι → M} [Ring R]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (hv : CompleteLattice.Independent fun i => R ∙ v i)
(h_ne_zero : ∀ i, Ideal.torsionOf R M (v i) = ⊥) : LinearIndependent R v := by
refine linearIndependent_iff_not_smul_mem_span.mpr fun i r hi => ?_
replace hv := CompleteLattice.independent_def.mp hv i
simp only [iSup_subtype', ← Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup (ι := Subtype _), disjoint_iff] at hv
have : r • v i ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) := by
rw [← hv, Submodule.mem_inf]
refine ⟨Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨r, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
convert hi
ext
simp
rw [← Submodule.mem_bot R, ← h_ne_zero i]
simpa using this
#align ideal.complete_lattice.independent.linear_independent' Ideal.CompleteLattice.Independent.linear_independent'
end TorsionOf
section
variable (R M : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
/-- The span of `x` in `M` is isomorphic to `R` quotiented by the torsion ideal of `x`. -/
noncomputable def quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton (x : M) : (R ⧸ torsionOf R M x) ≃ₗ[R] R ∙ x :=
(LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x).quotKerEquivRange.trans <|
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ (LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range R M x).symm
#align ideal.quot_torsion_of_equiv_span_singleton Ideal.quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton_apply_mk (x : M) (a : R) :
quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton R M x (Submodule.Quotient.mk a) =
a • ⟨x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ :=
rfl
#align ideal.quot_torsion_of_equiv_span_singleton_apply_mk Ideal.quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton_apply_mk
end
end Ideal
open nonZeroDivisors
section Defs
variable (R M : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
namespace Submodule
/-- The `a`-torsion submodule for `a` in `R`, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionBy (a : R) : Submodule R M :=
-- Porting note (#11036): broken dot notation on LinearMap.ker Lean4#1910
LinearMap.ker (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M a)
#align submodule.torsion_by Submodule.torsionBy
/-- The submodule containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for all `a` in `s`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionBySet (s : Set R) : Submodule R M :=
sInf (torsionBy R M '' s)
#align submodule.torsion_by_set Submodule.torsionBySet
-- Porting note: torsion' had metavariables and factoring out this fixed it
-- perhaps there is a better fix
/-- The additive submonoid of all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0`
for some `a` in `S`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsion'AddSubMonoid (S : Type*) [CommMonoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] :
AddSubmonoid M where
carrier := { x | ∃ a : S, a • x = 0 }
add_mem' := by
intro x y ⟨a,hx⟩ ⟨b,hy⟩
use b * a
rw [smul_add, mul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul, hx, hy, smul_zero, smul_zero, add_zero]
zero_mem' := ⟨1, smul_zero 1⟩
/-- The `S`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for some
`a` in `S`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsion' (S : Type*) [CommMonoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass S R M] :
Submodule R M :=
{ torsion'AddSubMonoid M S with
smul_mem' := fun a x ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨b, by rw [smul_comm, h, smul_zero]⟩}
#align submodule.torsion' Submodule.torsion'
/-- The torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for some
non-zero-divisor `a` in `R`. -/
abbrev torsion :=
torsion' R M R⁰
#align submodule.torsion Submodule.torsion
end Submodule
namespace Module
/-- An `a`-torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBy (a : R) :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, a • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion_by Module.IsTorsionBy
/-- A module where every element is `a`-torsion for all `a` in `s`. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBySet (s : Set R) :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄ ⦃a : s⦄, (a : R) • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion_by_set Module.IsTorsionBySet
/-- An `S`-torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion for some `a` in `S`. -/
abbrev IsTorsion' (S : Type*) [SMul S M] :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, ∃ a : S, a • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion' Module.IsTorsion'
/-- A torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion for some non-zero-divisor `a`.
-/
abbrev IsTorsion :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, ∃ a : R⁰, a • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion Module.IsTorsion
theorem isTorsionBySet_annihilator : IsTorsionBySet R M (Module.annihilator R M) :=
fun _ r ↦ Module.mem_annihilator.mp r.2 _
end Module
end Defs
lemma isSMulRegular_iff_torsionBy_eq_bot {R} (M : Type*)
[CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (r : R) :
IsSMulRegular M r ↔ Submodule.torsionBy R M r = ⊥ :=
Iff.symm (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M r).ker_eq_bot
variable {R M : Type*}
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (a : R)
namespace Submodule
@[simp]
theorem smul_torsionBy (x : torsionBy R M a) : a • x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext x.prop
#align submodule.smul_torsion_by Submodule.smul_torsionBy
@[simp]
theorem smul_coe_torsionBy (x : torsionBy R M a) : a • (x : M) = 0 :=
x.prop
#align submodule.smul_coe_torsion_by Submodule.smul_coe_torsionBy
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionBy_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsionBy R M a ↔ a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_torsion_by_iff Submodule.mem_torsionBy_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionBySet_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsionBySet R M s ↔ ∀ a : s, (a : R) • x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ⟨a, ha⟩ => mem_sInf.mp h _ (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ ha), fun h => mem_sInf.mpr ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact h ⟨a, ha⟩
#align submodule.mem_torsion_by_set_iff Submodule.mem_torsionBySet_iff
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_singleton_eq : torsionBySet R M {a} = torsionBy R M a := by
ext x
simp only [mem_torsionBySet_iff, SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
forall_eq, mem_torsionBy_iff]
#align submodule.torsion_by_singleton_eq Submodule.torsionBySet_singleton_eq
theorem torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset {s t : Set R} (st : s ⊆ t) :
torsionBySet R M t ≤ torsionBySet R M s :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ⟨a, st ha, h⟩
#align submodule.torsion_by_set_le_torsion_by_set_of_subset Submodule.torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset
/-- Torsion by a set is torsion by the ideal generated by it. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Torsion.lean | 281 | 289 | theorem torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span :
torsionBySet R M s = torsionBySet R M (Ideal.span s) := by |
refine le_antisymm (fun x hx => ?_) (torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset subset_span)
rw [mem_torsionBySet_iff] at hx ⊢
suffices Ideal.span s ≤ Ideal.torsionOf R M x by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
exact this ha
rw [Ideal.span_le]
exact fun a ha => hx ⟨a, ha⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
#align_import data.nat.gcd.big_operators from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
/-! # Lemmas about coprimality with big products.
These lemmas are kept separate from `Data.Nat.GCD.Basic` in order to minimize imports.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {ι : Type*}
theorem coprime_list_prod_left_iff {l : List ℕ} {k : ℕ} :
Coprime l.prod k ↔ ∀ n ∈ l, Coprime n k := by
induction l <;> simp [Nat.coprime_mul_iff_left, *]
theorem coprime_list_prod_right_iff {k : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
Coprime k l.prod ↔ ∀ n ∈ l, Coprime k n := by
simp_rw [coprime_comm (n := k), coprime_list_prod_left_iff]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/BigOperators.lean | 28 | 30 | theorem coprime_multiset_prod_left_iff {m : Multiset ℕ} {k : ℕ} :
Coprime m.prod k ↔ ∀ n ∈ m, Coprime n k := by |
induction m using Quotient.inductionOn; simpa using coprime_list_prod_left_iff
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Pi
#align_import order.filter.germ from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
/-!
# Germ of a function at a filter
The germ of a function `f : α → β` at a filter `l : Filter α` is the equivalence class of `f`
with respect to the equivalence relation `EventuallyEq l`: `f ≈ g` means `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`.
## Main definitions
We define
* `Filter.Germ l β` to be the space of germs of functions `α → β` at a filter `l : Filter α`;
* coercion from `α → β` to `Germ l β`: `(f : Germ l β)` is the germ of `f : α → β`
at `l : Filter α`; this coercion is declared as `CoeTC`;
* `(const l c : Germ l β)` is the germ of the constant function `fun x : α ↦ c` at a filter `l`;
* coercion from `β` to `Germ l β`: `(↑c : Germ l β)` is the germ of the constant function
`fun x : α ↦ c` at a filter `l`; this coercion is declared as `CoeTC`;
* `map (F : β → γ) (f : Germ l β)` to be the composition of a function `F` and a germ `f`;
* `map₂ (F : β → γ → δ) (f : Germ l β) (g : Germ l γ)` to be the germ of `fun x ↦ F (f x) (g x)`
at `l`;
* `f.Tendsto lb`: we say that a germ `f : Germ l β` tends to a filter `lb` if its representatives
tend to `lb` along `l`;
* `f.compTendsto g hg` and `f.compTendsto' g hg`: given `f : Germ l β` and a function
`g : γ → α` (resp., a germ `g : Germ lc α`), if `g` tends to `l` along `lc`, then the composition
`f ∘ g` is a well-defined germ at `lc`;
* `Germ.liftPred`, `Germ.liftRel`: lift a predicate or a relation to the space of germs:
`(f : Germ l β).liftPred p` means `∀ᶠ x in l, p (f x)`, and similarly for a relation.
We also define `map (F : β → γ) : Germ l β → Germ l γ` sending each germ `f` to `F ∘ f`.
For each of the following structures we prove that if `β` has this structure, then so does
`Germ l β`:
* one-operation algebraic structures up to `CommGroup`;
* `MulZeroClass`, `Distrib`, `Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`;
* `MulAction`, `DistribMulAction`, `Module`;
* `Preorder`, `PartialOrder`, and `Lattice` structures, as well as `BoundedOrder`;
* `OrderedCancelCommMonoid` and `OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid`.
## Tags
filter, germ
-/
namespace Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem const_eventuallyEq' [NeBot l] {a b : β} : (∀ᶠ _ in l, a = b) ↔ a = b :=
eventually_const
#align filter.const_eventually_eq' Filter.const_eventuallyEq'
theorem const_eventuallyEq [NeBot l] {a b : β} : ((fun _ => a) =ᶠ[l] fun _ => b) ↔ a = b :=
@const_eventuallyEq' _ _ _ _ a b
#align filter.const_eventually_eq Filter.const_eventuallyEq
/-- Setoid used to define the space of germs. -/
def germSetoid (l : Filter α) (β : Type*) : Setoid (α → β) where
r := EventuallyEq l
iseqv := ⟨EventuallyEq.refl _, EventuallyEq.symm, EventuallyEq.trans⟩
#align filter.germ_setoid Filter.germSetoid
/-- The space of germs of functions `α → β` at a filter `l`. -/
def Germ (l : Filter α) (β : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (germSetoid l β)
#align filter.germ Filter.Germ
/-- Setoid used to define the filter product. This is a dependent version of
`Filter.germSetoid`. -/
def productSetoid (l : Filter α) (ε : α → Type*) : Setoid ((a : _) → ε a) where
r f g := ∀ᶠ a in l, f a = g a
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => eventually_of_forall fun _ => rfl, fun h => h.mono fun _ => Eq.symm,
fun h1 h2 => h1.congr (h2.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl)⟩
#align filter.product_setoid Filter.productSetoid
/-- The filter product `(a : α) → ε a` at a filter `l`. This is a dependent version of
`Filter.Germ`. -/
-- Porting note: removed @[protected]
def Product (l : Filter α) (ε : α → Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (productSetoid l ε)
#align filter.product Filter.Product
namespace Product
variable {ε : α → Type*}
instance coeTC : CoeTC ((a : _) → ε a) (l.Product ε) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' _ (productSetoid _ ε)⟩
instance instInhabited [(a : _) → Inhabited (ε a)] : Inhabited (l.Product ε) :=
⟨(↑fun a => (default : ε a) : l.Product ε)⟩
end Product
namespace Germ
-- Porting note: added
@[coe]
def ofFun : (α → β) → (Germ l β) := @Quotient.mk' _ (germSetoid _ _)
instance : CoeTC (α → β) (Germ l β) :=
⟨ofFun⟩
@[coe] -- Porting note: removed `HasLiftT` instance
def const {l : Filter α} (b : β) : (Germ l β) := ofFun fun _ => b
instance coeTC : CoeTC β (Germ l β) :=
⟨const⟩
/-- A germ `P` of functions `α → β` is constant w.r.t. `l`. -/
def IsConstant {l : Filter α} (P : Germ l β) : Prop :=
P.liftOn (fun f ↦ ∃ b : β, f =ᶠ[l] (fun _ ↦ b)) <| by
suffices ∀ f g : α → β, ∀ b : β, f =ᶠ[l] g → (f =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ b) → (g =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ b) from
fun f g h ↦ propext ⟨fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, this f g b h hb⟩, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨b, h.trans hb⟩⟩
exact fun f g b hfg hf ↦ (hfg.symm).trans hf
theorem isConstant_coe {l : Filter α} {b} (h : ∀ x', f x' = b) : (↑f : Germ l β).IsConstant :=
⟨b, eventually_of_forall (fun x ↦ h x)⟩
@[simp]
theorem isConstant_coe_const {l : Filter α} {b : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ b : Germ l β).IsConstant := by
use b
/-- If `f : α → β` is constant w.r.t. `l` and `g : β → γ`, then `g ∘ f : α → γ` also is. -/
lemma isConstant_comp {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(h : (f : Germ l β).IsConstant) : ((g ∘ f) : Germ l γ).IsConstant := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := h
exact ⟨g b, hb.fun_comp g⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_eq_coe (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : Quot.mk _ f = (f : Germ l β) :=
rfl
#align filter.germ.quot_mk_eq_coe Filter.Germ.quot_mk_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_coe (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) :
@Quotient.mk' _ (germSetoid _ _) f = (f : Germ l β) :=
rfl
#align filter.germ.mk'_eq_coe Filter.Germ.mk'_eq_coe
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn (f : Germ l β) {p : Germ l β → Prop} (h : ∀ f : α → β, p f) : p f :=
Quotient.inductionOn' f h
#align filter.germ.induction_on Filter.Germ.inductionOn
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ (f : Germ l β) (g : Germ l γ) {p : Germ l β → Germ l γ → Prop}
(h : ∀ (f : α → β) (g : α → γ), p f g) : p f g :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂' f g h
#align filter.germ.induction_on₂ Filter.Germ.inductionOn₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ (f : Germ l β) (g : Germ l γ) (h : Germ l δ)
{p : Germ l β → Germ l γ → Germ l δ → Prop}
(H : ∀ (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) (h : α → δ), p f g h) : p f g h :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃' f g h H
#align filter.germ.induction_on₃ Filter.Germ.inductionOn₃
/-- Given a map `F : (α → β) → (γ → δ)` that sends functions eventually equal at `l` to functions
eventually equal at `lc`, returns a map from `Germ l β` to `Germ lc δ`. -/
def map' {lc : Filter γ} (F : (α → β) → γ → δ) (hF : (l.EventuallyEq ⇒ lc.EventuallyEq) F F) :
Germ l β → Germ lc δ :=
Quotient.map' F hF
#align filter.germ.map' Filter.Germ.map'
/-- Given a germ `f : Germ l β` and a function `F : (α → β) → γ` sending eventually equal functions
to the same value, returns the value `F` takes on functions having germ `f` at `l`. -/
def liftOn {γ : Sort*} (f : Germ l β) (F : (α → β) → γ) (hF : (l.EventuallyEq ⇒ (· = ·)) F F) :
γ :=
Quotient.liftOn' f F hF
#align filter.germ.lift_on Filter.Germ.liftOn
@[simp]
theorem map'_coe {lc : Filter γ} (F : (α → β) → γ → δ) (hF : (l.EventuallyEq ⇒ lc.EventuallyEq) F F)
(f : α → β) : map' F hF f = F f :=
rfl
#align filter.germ.map'_coe Filter.Germ.map'_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq : (f : Germ l β) = g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] g :=
Quotient.eq''
#align filter.germ.coe_eq Filter.Germ.coe_eq
alias ⟨_, _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.germ_eq⟩ := coe_eq
#align filter.eventually_eq.germ_eq Filter.EventuallyEq.germ_eq
/-- Lift a function `β → γ` to a function `Germ l β → Germ l γ`. -/
def map (op : β → γ) : Germ l β → Germ l γ :=
map' (op ∘ ·) fun _ _ H => H.mono fun _ H => congr_arg op H
#align filter.germ.map Filter.Germ.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (op : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map op (f : Germ l β) = op ∘ f :=
rfl
#align filter.germ.map_coe Filter.Germ.map_coe
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Germ.lean | 209 | 211 | theorem map_id : map id = (id : Germ l β → Germ l β) := by |
ext ⟨f⟩
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import algebra.big_operators.intervals from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Results about big operators over intervals
We prove results about big operators over intervals.
-/
open Nat
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [CommMonoid M] {f : α → M} {a b : α}
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f b * ∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x) * f b = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc h]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ioc h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioc_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc h]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Iio_mul_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
[CommMonoid M]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag (f : α → α → M) :
∏ i, ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, f j i * f i j = ∏ i, ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, f j i := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_disjUnion_Iio, prod_disjUnion, prod_mul_distrib]
congr 1
rw [prod_sigma', prod_sigma']
refine prod_nbij' (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp
#align finset.prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag Finset.prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag
#align finset.sum_sum_Ioi_add_eq_sum_sum_off_diag Finset.sum_sum_Ioi_add_eq_sum_sum_off_diag
end LinearOrder
section Generic
variable [CommMonoid M] {s₂ s₁ s : Finset α} {a : α} {g f : α → M}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add' [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (x + c)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
rw [← map_add_right_Ico, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_Ico_add' Finset.prod_Ico_add'
#align finset.sum_Ico_add' Finset.sum_Ico_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (c + x)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
convert prod_Ico_add' f a b c using 2
rw [add_comm]
#align finset.prod_Ico_add Finset.prod_Ico_add
#align finset.sum_Ico_add Finset.sum_Ico_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ico a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k) * f b := by
rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hab, prod_insert right_not_mem_Ico, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_Ico_succ_top Finset.prod_Ico_succ_top
#align finset.sum_Ico_succ_top Finset.sum_Ico_succ_top
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot {a b : ℕ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k = f a * ∏ k ∈ Ico (a + 1) b, f k := by
have ha : a ∉ Ico (a + 1) b := by simp
rw [← prod_insert ha, Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left hab]
#align finset.prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot Finset.prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot
#align finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot Finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ico m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ico n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ico m k, f i :=
Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hmn hnk ▸ Eq.symm (prod_union (Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive m n k))
#align finset.prod_Ico_consecutive Finset.prod_Ico_consecutive
#align finset.sum_Ico_consecutive Finset.sum_Ico_consecutive
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ioc m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ioc n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ioc m k, f i := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc hmn hnk, prod_union]
apply disjoint_left.2 fun x hx h'x => _
intros x hx h'x
exact lt_irrefl _ ((mem_Ioc.1 h'x).1.trans_le (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2)
#align finset.prod_Ioc_consecutive Finset.prod_Ioc_consecutive
#align finset.sum_Ioc_consecutive Finset.sum_Ioc_consecutive
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ioc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ioc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← prod_Ioc_consecutive _ hab (Nat.le_succ b), Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_Ioc_succ_top Finset.prod_Ioc_succ_top
#align finset.sum_Ioc_succ_top Finset.sum_Ioc_succ_top
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Icc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b + 1) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k in Icc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k in Icc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.Ico_succ_right, prod_Ico_succ_top hab, Nat.Ico_succ_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_mul_prod_Ico (f : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) * ∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k) = ∏ k ∈ range n, f k :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ prod_Ico_consecutive f m.zero_le h
#align finset.prod_range_mul_prod_Ico Finset.prod_range_mul_prod_Ico
#align finset.sum_range_add_sum_Ico Finset.sum_range_add_sum_Ico
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) * (∏ k ∈ range m, f k)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq.2 <| by (rw [mul_comm]; exact prod_range_mul_prod_Ico f h)
#align finset.prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv Finset.prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv
#align finset.sum_Ico_eq_add_neg Finset.sum_Ico_eq_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_div {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range m, f k := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv f h
#align finset.prod_Ico_eq_div Finset.prod_Ico_eq_div
#align finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] {f : ℕ → α} {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k) =
∏ k ∈ (range m).filter fun k => n ≤ k, f k := by
rw [← prod_Ico_eq_div f hnm]
congr
apply Finset.ext
simp only [mem_Ico, mem_filter, mem_range, *]
tauto
#align finset.prod_range_sub_prod_range Finset.prod_range_div_prod_range
#align finset.sum_range_sub_sum_range Finset.sum_range_sub_sum_range
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i ≤ j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico i b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a (j + 1), f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ <;>
omega
#align finset.sum_Ico_Ico_comm Finset.sum_Ico_Ico_comm
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i < j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico (i + 1) b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a j, f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ <;>
omega
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_prod_range (f : ℕ → M) (m n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = ∏ k ∈ range (n - m), f (m + k) := by
by_cases h : m ≤ n
· rw [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, prod_Ico_add, zero_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· replace h : n ≤ m := le_of_not_ge h
rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h, range_zero, prod_empty, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_Ico_eq_prod_range Finset.prod_Ico_eq_prod_range
#align finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Intervals.lean | 222 | 237 | theorem prod_Ico_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n + 1) :
(∏ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∏ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j := by |
have : ∀ i < m, i ≤ n := by
intro i hi
exact (add_le_add_iff_right 1).1 (le_trans (Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le.1 hi) h)
cases' lt_or_le k m with hkm hkm
· rw [← Nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (this _ hkm)]
refine (prod_image ?_).symm
simp only [mem_Ico]
rintro i ⟨_, im⟩ j ⟨_, jm⟩ Hij
rw [← tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ im), Hij, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ jm)]
· have : n + 1 - k ≤ n + 1 - m := by
rw [tsub_le_tsub_iff_left h]
exact hkm
simp only [ge_iff_le, hkm, Ico_eq_empty_of_le, prod_empty, tsub_le_iff_right, Ico_eq_empty_of_le
this]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Parity
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.ZModChar
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.quadratic_char.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
/-!
# Quadratic characters of finite fields
This file defines the quadratic character on a finite field `F` and proves
some basic statements about it.
## Tags
quadratic character
-/
/-!
### Definition of the quadratic character
We define the quadratic character of a finite field `F` with values in ℤ.
-/
section Define
/-- Define the quadratic character with values in ℤ on a monoid with zero `α`.
It takes the value zero at zero; for non-zero argument `a : α`, it is `1`
if `a` is a square, otherwise it is `-1`.
This only deserves the name "character" when it is multiplicative,
e.g., when `α` is a finite field. See `quadraticCharFun_mul`.
We will later define `quadraticChar` to be a multiplicative character
of type `MulChar F ℤ`, when the domain is a finite field `F`.
-/
def quadraticCharFun (α : Type*) [MonoidWithZero α] [DecidableEq α]
[DecidablePred (IsSquare : α → Prop)] (a : α) : ℤ :=
if a = 0 then 0 else if IsSquare a then 1 else -1
#align quadratic_char_fun quadraticCharFun
end Define
/-!
### Basic properties of the quadratic character
We prove some properties of the quadratic character.
We work with a finite field `F` here.
The interesting case is when the characteristic of `F` is odd.
-/
section quadraticChar
open MulChar
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F]
/-- Some basic API lemmas -/
theorem quadraticCharFun_eq_zero_iff {a : F} : quadraticCharFun F a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [quadraticCharFun]
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
· simp only [ha, if_false, iff_false_iff]
split_ifs <;> simp only [neg_eq_zero, one_ne_zero, not_false_iff]
#align quadratic_char_fun_eq_zero_iff quadraticCharFun_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem quadraticCharFun_zero : quadraticCharFun F 0 = 0 := by
simp only [quadraticCharFun, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, id]
#align quadratic_char_fun_zero quadraticCharFun_zero
@[simp]
theorem quadraticCharFun_one : quadraticCharFun F 1 = 1 := by
simp only [quadraticCharFun, one_ne_zero, isSquare_one, if_true, if_false, id]
#align quadratic_char_fun_one quadraticCharFun_one
/-- If `ringChar F = 2`, then `quadraticCharFun F` takes the value `1` on nonzero elements. -/
theorem quadraticCharFun_eq_one_of_char_two (hF : ringChar F = 2) {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
quadraticCharFun F a = 1 := by
simp only [quadraticCharFun, ha, if_false, ite_eq_left_iff]
exact fun h => (h (FiniteField.isSquare_of_char_two hF a)).elim
#align quadratic_char_fun_eq_one_of_char_two quadraticCharFun_eq_one_of_char_two
/-- If `ringChar F` is odd, then `quadraticCharFun F a` can be computed in
terms of `a ^ (Fintype.card F / 2)`. -/
theorem quadraticCharFun_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two (hF : ringChar F ≠ 2) {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
quadraticCharFun F a = if a ^ (Fintype.card F / 2) = 1 then 1 else -1 := by
simp only [quadraticCharFun, ha, if_false]
simp_rw [FiniteField.isSquare_iff hF ha]
#align quadratic_char_fun_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two quadraticCharFun_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two
/-- The quadratic character is multiplicative. -/
theorem quadraticCharFun_mul (a b : F) :
quadraticCharFun F (a * b) = quadraticCharFun F a * quadraticCharFun F b := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· rw [ha, zero_mul, quadraticCharFun_zero, zero_mul]
-- now `a ≠ 0`
by_cases hb : b = 0
· rw [hb, mul_zero, quadraticCharFun_zero, mul_zero]
-- now `a ≠ 0` and `b ≠ 0`
have hab := mul_ne_zero ha hb
by_cases hF : ringChar F = 2
·-- case `ringChar F = 2`
rw [quadraticCharFun_eq_one_of_char_two hF ha, quadraticCharFun_eq_one_of_char_two hF hb,
quadraticCharFun_eq_one_of_char_two hF hab, mul_one]
· -- case of odd characteristic
rw [quadraticCharFun_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two hF ha, quadraticCharFun_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two hF hb,
quadraticCharFun_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two hF hab, mul_pow]
cases' FiniteField.pow_dichotomy hF hb with hb' hb'
· simp only [hb', mul_one, eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
· have h := Ring.neg_one_ne_one_of_char_ne_two hF
-- `-1 ≠ 1`
simp only [hb', h, mul_neg, mul_one, if_false, ite_mul, neg_mul]
cases' FiniteField.pow_dichotomy hF ha with ha' ha' <;>
simp only [ha', h, neg_neg, eq_self_iff_true, if_true, if_false]
#align quadratic_char_fun_mul quadraticCharFun_mul
variable (F)
/-- The quadratic character as a multiplicative character. -/
@[simps]
def quadraticChar : MulChar F ℤ where
toFun := quadraticCharFun F
map_one' := quadraticCharFun_one
map_mul' := quadraticCharFun_mul
map_nonunit' a ha := by rw [of_not_not (mt Ne.isUnit ha)]; exact quadraticCharFun_zero
#align quadratic_char quadraticChar
variable {F}
/-- The value of the quadratic character on `a` is zero iff `a = 0`. -/
theorem quadraticChar_eq_zero_iff {a : F} : quadraticChar F a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
quadraticCharFun_eq_zero_iff
#align quadratic_char_eq_zero_iff quadraticChar_eq_zero_iff
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem quadraticChar_zero : quadraticChar F 0 = 0 := by
simp only [quadraticChar_apply, quadraticCharFun_zero]
#align quadratic_char_zero quadraticChar_zero
/-- For nonzero `a : F`, `quadraticChar F a = 1 ↔ IsSquare a`. -/
theorem quadraticChar_one_iff_isSquare {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
quadraticChar F a = 1 ↔ IsSquare a := by
simp only [quadraticChar_apply, quadraticCharFun, ha, (by decide : (-1 : ℤ) ≠ 1), if_false,
ite_eq_left_iff, imp_false, Classical.not_not]
#align quadratic_char_one_iff_is_square quadraticChar_one_iff_isSquare
/-- The quadratic character takes the value `1` on nonzero squares. -/
theorem quadraticChar_sq_one' {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) : quadraticChar F (a ^ 2) = 1 := by
simp only [quadraticCharFun, ha, sq_eq_zero_iff, IsSquare_sq, if_true, if_false,
quadraticChar_apply]
#align quadratic_char_sq_one' quadraticChar_sq_one'
/-- The square of the quadratic character on nonzero arguments is `1`. -/
theorem quadraticChar_sq_one {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) : quadraticChar F a ^ 2 = 1 := by
-- Porting note(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5164): was
-- rwa [pow_two, ← map_mul, ← pow_two, quadraticChar_sq_one']
erw [pow_two, ← map_mul (quadraticChar F) a, ← pow_two]
apply quadraticChar_sq_one' ha
#align quadratic_char_sq_one quadraticChar_sq_one
/-- The quadratic character is `1` or `-1` on nonzero arguments. -/
theorem quadraticChar_dichotomy {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
quadraticChar F a = 1 ∨ quadraticChar F a = -1 :=
sq_eq_one_iff.1 <| quadraticChar_sq_one ha
#align quadratic_char_dichotomy quadraticChar_dichotomy
/-- The quadratic character is `1` or `-1` on nonzero arguments. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/QuadraticChar/Basic.lean | 176 | 180 | theorem quadraticChar_eq_neg_one_iff_not_one {a : F} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
quadraticChar F a = -1 ↔ ¬quadraticChar F a = 1 := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h₂ => (or_iff_right h₂).mp (quadraticChar_dichotomy ha)⟩
rw [h]
norm_num
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
#align_import algebra.cubic_discriminant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"930133160e24036d5242039fe4972407cd4f1222"
/-!
# Cubics and discriminants
This file defines cubic polynomials over a semiring and their discriminants over a splitting field.
## Main definitions
* `Cubic`: the structure representing a cubic polynomial.
* `Cubic.disc`: the discriminant of a cubic polynomial.
## Main statements
* `Cubic.disc_ne_zero_iff_roots_nodup`: the cubic discriminant is not equal to zero if and only if
the cubic has no duplicate roots.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant
## Tags
cubic, discriminant, polynomial, root
-/
noncomputable section
/-- The structure representing a cubic polynomial. -/
@[ext]
structure Cubic (R : Type*) where
(a b c d : R)
#align cubic Cubic
namespace Cubic
open Cubic Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {R S F K : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default⟩⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
section Basic
variable {P Q : Cubic R} {a b c d a' b' c' d' : R} [Semiring R]
/-- Convert a cubic polynomial to a polynomial. -/
def toPoly (P : Cubic R) : R[X] :=
C P.a * X ^ 3 + C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d
#align cubic.to_poly Cubic.toPoly
theorem C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {w x y z : S} :
C w * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨w, w * -(x + y + z), w * (x * y + x * z + y * z), w * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
simp only [toPoly, C_neg, C_add, C_mul]
ring1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq
theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {x y z : S} :
(X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨1, -(x + y + z), x * y + x * z + y * z, -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
rw [← one_mul <| X - C x, ← C_1, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq, one_mul, one_mul, one_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq
/-! ### Coefficients -/
section Coeff
private theorem coeffs : (∀ n > 3, P.toPoly.coeff n = 0) ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a ∧
P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d := by
simp only [toPoly, coeff_add, coeff_C, coeff_C_mul_X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
intro n hn
repeat' rw [if_neg]
any_goals linarith only [hn]
repeat' rw [zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 < n) : P.toPoly.coeff n = 0 :=
coeffs.1 n hn
#align cubic.coeff_eq_zero Cubic.coeff_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_a : P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a :=
coeffs.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_a Cubic.coeff_eq_a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_b : P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b :=
coeffs.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_b Cubic.coeff_eq_b
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_c : P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c :=
coeffs.2.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_c Cubic.coeff_eq_c
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_d : P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d :=
coeffs.2.2.2.2
#align cubic.coeff_eq_d Cubic.coeff_eq_d
theorem a_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.a = Q.a := by rw [← coeff_eq_a, h, coeff_eq_a]
#align cubic.a_of_eq Cubic.a_of_eq
theorem b_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.b = Q.b := by rw [← coeff_eq_b, h, coeff_eq_b]
#align cubic.b_of_eq Cubic.b_of_eq
theorem c_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.c = Q.c := by rw [← coeff_eq_c, h, coeff_eq_c]
#align cubic.c_of_eq Cubic.c_of_eq
theorem d_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.d = Q.d := by rw [← coeff_eq_d, h, coeff_eq_d]
#align cubic.d_of_eq Cubic.d_of_eq
theorem toPoly_injective (P Q : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly ↔ P = Q :=
⟨fun h ↦ Cubic.ext P Q (a_of_eq h) (b_of_eq h) (c_of_eq h) (d_of_eq h), congr_arg toPoly⟩
#align cubic.to_poly_injective Cubic.toPoly_injective
theorem of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [toPoly, ha, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_a_eq_zero Cubic.of_a_eq_zero
theorem of_a_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩ = C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d :=
of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.of_a_eq_zero'
theorem of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, hb, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_b_eq_zero Cubic.of_b_eq_zero
theorem of_b_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩ = C c * X + C d :=
of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.of_b_eq_zero'
theorem of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.d := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, hc, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align cubic.of_c_eq_zero Cubic.of_c_eq_zero
theorem of_c_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩ = C d :=
of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.of_c_eq_zero'
theorem of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd, C_0]
#align cubic.of_d_eq_zero Cubic.of_d_eq_zero
theorem of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.of_d_eq_zero' Cubic.of_d_eq_zero'
theorem zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero'
#align cubic.zero Cubic.zero
theorem toPoly_eq_zero_iff (P : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = 0 ↔ P = 0 := by
rw [← zero, toPoly_injective]
#align cubic.to_poly_eq_zero_iff Cubic.toPoly_eq_zero_iff
private theorem ne_zero (h0 : P.a ≠ 0 ∨ P.b ≠ 0 ∨ P.c ≠ 0 ∨ P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h0
rw [(toPoly_eq_zero_iff P).mp h0]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
theorem ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp ne_zero).1 ha
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).1 hb
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_b_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).1 hc
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_c_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero (hd : P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp (or_imp.mp ne_zero).2).2).2 hd
#align cubic.ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero Cubic.ne_zero_of_d_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.a :=
leadingCoeff_cubic ha
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = a :=
leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.b := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, leadingCoeff_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = b :=
leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.c := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, leadingCoeff_linear hc]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).leadingCoeff = c :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) :
P.toPoly.leadingCoeff = P.d := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, leadingCoeff_C]
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).leadingCoeff = d :=
leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.leading_coeff_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero'
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one (ha : P.a = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero (ha ▸ one_ne_zero), ha]
#align cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one
theorem monic_of_a_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨1, b, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_a_eq_one rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_a_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_b_ne_zero ha (hb ▸ one_ne_zero), hb]
#align cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one
theorem monic_of_b_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 1, c, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_b_eq_one rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_b_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_c_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 1) : P.toPoly.Monic := by
nontriviality R
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_ne_zero ha hb (hc ▸ one_ne_zero), hc]
#align cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one
theorem monic_of_c_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 1, d⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_c_eq_one rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_c_eq_one'
theorem monic_of_d_eq_one (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 1) :
P.toPoly.Monic := by
rw [Monic, leadingCoeff_of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd]
#align cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one Cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one
theorem monic_of_d_eq_one' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩).Monic :=
monic_of_d_eq_one rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one' Cubic.monic_of_d_eq_one'
end Coeff
/-! ### Degrees -/
section Degree
/-- The equivalence between cubic polynomials and polynomials of degree at most three. -/
@[simps]
def equiv : Cubic R ≃ { p : R[X] // p.degree ≤ 3 } where
toFun P := ⟨P.toPoly, degree_cubic_le⟩
invFun f := ⟨coeff f 3, coeff f 2, coeff f 1, coeff f 0⟩
left_inv P := by ext <;> simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, coeffs]
right_inv f := by
-- Porting note: Added `simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] <;> ring_nf`
-- There's probably a better way to do this.
ext (_ | _ | _ | _ | n) <;> simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] <;> ring_nf
<;> try simp only [coeffs]
have h3 : 3 < 4 + n := by linarith only
rw [coeff_eq_zero h3,
(degree_le_iff_coeff_zero (f : R[X]) 3).mp f.2 _ <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr (by exact h3)]
#align cubic.equiv Cubic.equiv
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 3 :=
degree_cubic ha
#align cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).degree = 3 :=
degree_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_a_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [of_a_eq_zero ha] using degree_quadratic_le
#align cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_a_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).degree ≤ 2 :=
degree_of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_a_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 2 := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, degree_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).degree = 2 :=
degree_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_b_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [of_b_eq_zero ha hb] using degree_linear_le
#align cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_b_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).degree ≤ 1 :=
degree_of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_b_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.degree = 1 := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, degree_linear hc]
#align cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).degree = 1 :=
degree_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_c_ne_zero'
theorem degree_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly.degree ≤ 0 := by
simpa only [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc] using degree_C_le
#align cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero
theorem degree_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).degree ≤ 0 :=
degree_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_c_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.degree = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, degree_C hd]
#align cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero Cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_ne_zero' (hd : d ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).degree = 0 :=
degree_of_d_ne_zero rfl rfl rfl hd
#align cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero' Cubic.degree_of_d_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly.degree = ⊥ := by
rw [of_d_eq_zero ha hb hc hd, degree_zero]
#align cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero Cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem degree_of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly.degree = ⊥ :=
degree_of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero' Cubic.degree_of_d_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem degree_of_zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly.degree = ⊥ :=
degree_of_d_eq_zero'
#align cubic.degree_of_zero Cubic.degree_of_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_cubic ha
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_a_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_a_ne_zero' (ha : a ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨a, b, c, d⟩).natDegree = 3 :=
natDegree_of_a_ne_zero ha
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_a_ne_zero'
theorem natDegree_of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree ≤ 2 := by
simpa only [of_a_eq_zero ha] using natDegree_quadratic_le
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_a_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_of_a_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).natDegree ≤ 2 :=
natDegree_of_a_eq_zero rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_a_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_a_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_b_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b ≠ 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree = 2 := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, natDegree_quadratic hb]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_b_ne_zero' (hb : b ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩).natDegree = 2 :=
natDegree_of_b_ne_zero rfl hb
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_b_ne_zero'
theorem natDegree_of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly.natDegree ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [of_b_eq_zero ha hb] using natDegree_linear_le
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_b_eq_zero
theorem natDegree_of_b_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_b_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_b_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_c_ne_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c ≠ 0) :
P.toPoly.natDegree = 1 := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, natDegree_linear hc]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_ne_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_c_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_c_ne_zero' (hc : c ≠ 0) : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩).natDegree = 1 :=
natDegree_of_c_ne_zero rfl rfl hc
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_ne_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_c_ne_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) :
P.toPoly.natDegree = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, natDegree_C]
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_eq_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_c_eq_zero
-- @[simp] -- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natDegree_of_c_eq_zero' : (toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩).natDegree = 0 :=
natDegree_of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_c_eq_zero' Cubic.natDegree_of_c_eq_zero'
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_of_zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly.natDegree = 0 :=
natDegree_of_c_eq_zero'
#align cubic.nat_degree_of_zero Cubic.natDegree_of_zero
end Degree
/-! ### Map across a homomorphism -/
section Map
variable [Semiring S] {φ : R →+* S}
/-- Map a cubic polynomial across a semiring homomorphism. -/
def map (φ : R →+* S) (P : Cubic R) : Cubic S :=
⟨φ P.a, φ P.b, φ P.c, φ P.d⟩
#align cubic.map Cubic.map
theorem map_toPoly : (map φ P).toPoly = Polynomial.map φ P.toPoly := by
simp only [map, toPoly, map_C, map_X, Polynomial.map_add, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_pow]
#align cubic.map_to_poly Cubic.map_toPoly
end Map
end Basic
section Roots
open Multiset
/-! ### Roots over an extension -/
section Extension
variable {P : Cubic R} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] {φ : R →+* S}
/-- The roots of a cubic polynomial. -/
def roots [IsDomain R] (P : Cubic R) : Multiset R :=
P.toPoly.roots
#align cubic.roots Cubic.roots
theorem map_roots [IsDomain S] : (map φ P).roots = (Polynomial.map φ P.toPoly).roots := by
rw [roots, map_toPoly]
#align cubic.map_roots Cubic.map_roots
theorem mem_roots_iff [IsDomain R] (h0 : P.toPoly ≠ 0) (x : R) :
x ∈ P.roots ↔ P.a * x ^ 3 + P.b * x ^ 2 + P.c * x + P.d = 0 := by
rw [roots, mem_roots h0, IsRoot, toPoly]
simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_add, eval_mul, eval_pow]
#align cubic.mem_roots_iff Cubic.mem_roots_iff
theorem card_roots_le [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] : P.roots.toFinset.card ≤ 3 := by
apply (toFinset_card_le P.toPoly.roots).trans
by_cases hP : P.toPoly = 0
· exact (card_roots' P.toPoly).trans (by rw [hP, natDegree_zero]; exact zero_le 3)
· exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 ((card_roots hP).trans degree_cubic_le)
#align cubic.card_roots_le Cubic.card_roots_le
end Extension
variable {P : Cubic F} [Field F] [Field K] {φ : F →+* K} {x y z : K}
/-! ### Roots over a splitting field -/
section Split
theorem splits_iff_card_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) :
Splits φ P.toPoly ↔ Multiset.card (map φ P).roots = 3 := by
replace ha : (map φ P).a ≠ 0 := (_root_.map_ne_zero φ).mpr ha
nth_rw 1 [← RingHom.id_comp φ]
rw [roots, ← splits_map_iff, ← map_toPoly, Polynomial.splits_iff_card_roots,
← ((degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq <| ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero ha).1 <| degree_of_a_ne_zero ha : _ = 3)]
#align cubic.splits_iff_card_roots Cubic.splits_iff_card_roots
theorem splits_iff_roots_eq_three (ha : P.a ≠ 0) :
Splits φ P.toPoly ↔ ∃ x y z : K, (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z} := by
rw [splits_iff_card_roots ha, card_eq_three]
#align cubic.splits_iff_roots_eq_three Cubic.splits_iff_roots_eq_three
theorem eq_prod_three_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) (h3 : (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z}) :
(map φ P).toPoly = C (φ P.a) * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) := by
rw [map_toPoly,
eq_prod_roots_of_splits <|
(splits_iff_roots_eq_three ha).mpr <| Exists.intro x <| Exists.intro y <| Exists.intro z h3,
leadingCoeff_of_a_ne_zero ha, ← map_roots, h3]
change C (φ P.a) * ((X - C x) ::ₘ (X - C y) ::ₘ {X - C z}).prod = _
rw [prod_cons, prod_cons, prod_singleton, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
#align cubic.eq_prod_three_roots Cubic.eq_prod_three_roots
theorem eq_sum_three_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) (h3 : (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z}) :
map φ P =
⟨φ P.a, φ P.a * -(x + y + z), φ P.a * (x * y + x * z + y * z), φ P.a * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
apply_fun @toPoly _ _
· rw [eq_prod_three_roots ha h3, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq]
· exact fun P Q ↦ (toPoly_injective P Q).mp
#align cubic.eq_sum_three_roots Cubic.eq_sum_three_roots
theorem b_eq_three_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) (h3 : (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z}) :
φ P.b = φ P.a * -(x + y + z) := by
injection eq_sum_three_roots ha h3
#align cubic.b_eq_three_roots Cubic.b_eq_three_roots
theorem c_eq_three_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) (h3 : (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z}) :
φ P.c = φ P.a * (x * y + x * z + y * z) := by
injection eq_sum_three_roots ha h3
#align cubic.c_eq_three_roots Cubic.c_eq_three_roots
theorem d_eq_three_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) (h3 : (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z}) :
φ P.d = φ P.a * -(x * y * z) := by
injection eq_sum_three_roots ha h3
#align cubic.d_eq_three_roots Cubic.d_eq_three_roots
end Split
/-! ### Discriminant over a splitting field -/
section Discriminant
/-- The discriminant of a cubic polynomial. -/
def disc {R : Type*} [Ring R] (P : Cubic R) : R :=
P.b ^ 2 * P.c ^ 2 - 4 * P.a * P.c ^ 3 - 4 * P.b ^ 3 * P.d - 27 * P.a ^ 2 * P.d ^ 2 +
18 * P.a * P.b * P.c * P.d
#align cubic.disc Cubic.disc
| Mathlib/Algebra/CubicDiscriminant.lean | 567 | 575 | theorem disc_eq_prod_three_roots (ha : P.a ≠ 0) (h3 : (map φ P).roots = {x, y, z}) :
φ P.disc = (φ P.a * φ P.a * (x - y) * (x - z) * (y - z)) ^ 2 := by |
simp only [disc, RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_mul, map_pow]
-- Porting note: Replaced `simp only [RingHom.map_one, map_bit0, map_bit1]` with f4, f18, f27
have f4 : φ 4 = 4 := map_natCast φ 4
have f18 : φ 18 = 18 := map_natCast φ 18
have f27 : φ 27 = 27 := map_natCast φ 27
rw [f4, f18, f27, b_eq_three_roots ha h3, c_eq_three_roots ha h3, d_eq_three_roots ha h3]
ring1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
#align_import order.liminf_limsup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ffde2d8a6e689149e44fd95fa862c23a57f8c780"
/-!
# liminfs and limsups of functions and filters
Defines the liminf/limsup of a function taking values in a conditionally complete lattice, with
respect to an arbitrary filter.
We define `limsSup f` (`limsInf f`) where `f` is a filter taking values in a conditionally complete
lattice. `limsSup f` is the smallest element `a` such that, eventually, `u ≤ a` (and vice versa for
`limsInf f`). To work with the Limsup along a function `u` use `limsSup (map u f)`.
Usually, one defines the Limsup as `inf (sup s)` where the Inf is taken over all sets in the filter.
For instance, in ℕ along a function `u`, this is `inf_n (sup_{k ≥ n} u k)` (and the latter quantity
decreases with `n`, so this is in fact a limit.). There is however a difficulty: it is well possible
that `u` is not bounded on the whole space, only eventually (think of `limsup (fun x ↦ 1/x)` on ℝ.
Then there is no guarantee that the quantity above really decreases (the value of the `sup`
beforehand is not really well defined, as one can not use ∞), so that the Inf could be anything.
So one can not use this `inf sup ...` definition in conditionally complete lattices, and one has
to use a less tractable definition.
In conditionally complete lattices, the definition is only useful for filters which are eventually
bounded above (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be +∞, which does not belong to the space) and
which are frequently bounded below (otherwise, the Limsup would morally be -∞, which is not in the
space either). We start with definitions of these concepts for arbitrary filters, before turning to
the definitions of Limsup and Liminf.
In complete lattices, however, it coincides with the `Inf Sup` definition.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Filter Set Function
variable {α β γ ι ι' : Type*}
namespace Filter
section Relation
/-- `f.IsBounded (≺)`: the filter `f` is eventually bounded w.r.t. the relation `≺`, i.e.
eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound.
`r` will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def IsBounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ᶠ x in f, r x b
#align filter.is_bounded Filter.IsBounded
/-- `f.IsBoundedUnder (≺) u`: the image of the filter `f` under `u` is eventually bounded w.r.t.
the relation `≺`, i.e. eventually, it is bounded by some uniform bound. -/
def IsBoundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsBounded r
#align filter.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBoundedUnder
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {f g : Filter α}
/-- `f` is eventually bounded if and only if, there exists an admissible set on which it is
bounded. -/
theorem isBounded_iff : f.IsBounded r ↔ ∃ s ∈ f.sets, ∃ b, s ⊆ { x | r x b } :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨{ a | r a b }, hb, b, Subset.refl _⟩) fun ⟨_, hs, b, hb⟩ =>
⟨b, mem_of_superset hs hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_iff Filter.isBounded_iff
/-- A bounded function `u` is in particular eventually bounded. -/
theorem isBoundedUnder_of {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (∃ b, ∀ x, r (u x) b) → f.IsBoundedUnder r u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, r (u x) b from eventually_of_forall hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_of Filter.isBoundedUnder_of
theorem isBounded_bot : IsBounded r ⊥ ↔ Nonempty α := by simp [IsBounded, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_bounded_bot Filter.isBounded_bot
theorem isBounded_top : IsBounded r ⊤ ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x, r x t := by simp [IsBounded, eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align filter.is_bounded_top Filter.isBounded_top
theorem isBounded_principal (s : Set α) : IsBounded r (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ t, ∀ x ∈ s, r x t := by
simp [IsBounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_bounded_principal Filter.isBounded_principal
theorem isBounded_sup [IsTrans α r] [IsDirected α r] :
IsBounded r f → IsBounded r g → IsBounded r (f ⊔ g)
| ⟨b₁, h₁⟩, ⟨b₂, h₂⟩ =>
let ⟨b, rb₁b, rb₂b⟩ := directed_of r b₁ b₂
⟨b, eventually_sup.mpr
⟨h₁.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₁b, h₂.mono fun _ h => _root_.trans h rb₂b⟩⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_sup Filter.isBounded_sup
theorem IsBounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : IsBounded r g → IsBounded r f
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, h hb⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.mono Filter.IsBounded.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono {f g : Filter β} {u : β → α} (h : f ≤ g) :
g.IsBoundedUnder r u → f.IsBoundedUnder r u := fun hg => IsBounded.mono (map_mono h) hg
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_le [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u) (hv : v ≤ᶠ[l] u) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l v := by
apply hu.imp
exact fun b hb => (eventually_map.1 hb).mp <| hv.mono fun x => le_trans
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_le Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(hu : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u) (hv : u ≤ᶠ[l] v) : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l v :=
IsBoundedUnder.mono_le (β := βᵒᵈ) hu hv
#align filter.is_bounded_under.mono_ge Filter.IsBoundedUnder.mono_ge
theorem isBoundedUnder_const [IsRefl α r] {l : Filter β} {a : α} : IsBoundedUnder r l fun _ => a :=
⟨a, eventually_map.2 <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => refl _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_const Filter.isBoundedUnder_const
theorem IsBounded.isBoundedUnder {q : β → β → Prop} {u : α → β}
(hu : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (u a₀) (u a₁)) : f.IsBounded r → f.IsBoundedUnder q u
| ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨u b, show ∀ᶠ x in f, q (u x) (u b) from h.mono fun x => hu x b⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_bounded_under Filter.IsBounded.isBoundedUnder
theorem IsBoundedUnder.comp {l : Filter γ} {q : β → β → Prop} {u : γ → α} {v : α → β}
(hv : ∀ a₀ a₁, r a₀ a₁ → q (v a₀) (v a₁)) : l.IsBoundedUnder r u → l.IsBoundedUnder q (v ∘ u)
| ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨v a, show ∀ᶠ x in map u l, q (v x) (v a) from h.mono fun x => hv x a⟩
/-- A bounded above function `u` is in particular eventually bounded above. -/
lemma _root_.BddAbove.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddAbove (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_upperBounds] using hb⟩
/-- A bounded below function `u` is in particular eventually bounded below. -/
lemma _root_.BddBelow.isBoundedUnder [Preorder α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
BddBelow (Set.range u) → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => isBoundedUnder_of ⟨b, by simpa [mem_lowerBounds] using hb⟩
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem _root_.Monotone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Monotone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp (swap hv)
theorem _root_.Antitone.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {l : Filter γ} {u : γ → α}
{v : α → β} (hv : Antitone v) (hl : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) :
l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) (v ∘ u) :=
hl.comp hv
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop [Preorder β] [NoMaxOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f := by
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
rw [eventually_map] at hb
obtain ⟨b', h⟩ := exists_gt b
have hb' := (tendsto_atTop.mp hf) b'
have : { x : α | f x ≤ b } ∩ { x : α | b' ≤ f x } = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x hx => (not_le_of_lt h) (le_trans hx.2 hx.1)
exact (nonempty_of_mem (hb.and hb')).ne_empty this
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_top Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop
theorem not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot [Preorder β] [NoMinOrder β] {f : α → β} {l : Filter α}
[l.NeBot] (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) : ¬IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atTop (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.not_is_bounded_under_of_tendsto_at_bot Filter.not_isBoundedUnder_of_tendsto_atBot
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) cofinite f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨b, hb⟩
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨b⟩
rw [← image_univ, ← union_compl_self { x | f x ≤ b }, image_union, bddAbove_union]
exact ⟨⟨b, forall_mem_image.2 fun x => id⟩, (hb.image f).bddAbove⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : α → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) cofinite f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range_of_cofinite Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range_of_cofinite
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) atTop f) : BddAbove (range f) := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop] at hf
exact hf.bddAbove_range_of_cofinite
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_above_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range
theorem IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range [Preorder β] [IsDirected β (· ≥ ·)] {f : ℕ → β}
(hf : IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) atTop f) : BddBelow (range f) :=
IsBoundedUnder.bddAbove_range (β := βᵒᵈ) hf
#align filter.is_bounded_under.bdd_below_range Filter.IsBoundedUnder.bddBelow_range
/-- `IsCobounded (≺) f` states that the filter `f` does not tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is
also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated with `≤` or `≥`.
There is a subtlety in this definition: we want `f.IsCobounded` to hold for any `f` in the case of
complete lattices. This will be relevant to deduce theorems on complete lattices from their
versions on conditionally complete lattices with additional assumptions. We have to be careful in
the edge case of the trivial filter containing the empty set: the other natural definition
`¬ ∀ a, ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n`
would not work as well in this case.
-/
def IsCobounded (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter α) :=
∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ᶠ x in f, r x a) → r b a
#align filter.is_cobounded Filter.IsCobounded
/-- `IsCoboundedUnder (≺) f u` states that the image of the filter `f` under the map `u` does not
tend to infinity w.r.t. `≺`. This is also called frequently bounded. Will be usually instantiated
with `≤` or `≥`. -/
def IsCoboundedUnder (r : α → α → Prop) (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) :=
(map u f).IsCobounded r
#align filter.is_cobounded_under Filter.IsCoboundedUnder
/-- To check that a filter is frequently bounded, it suffices to have a witness
which bounds `f` at some point for every admissible set.
This is only an implication, as the other direction is wrong for the trivial filter. -/
theorem IsCobounded.mk [IsTrans α r] (a : α) (h : ∀ s ∈ f, ∃ x ∈ s, r a x) : f.IsCobounded r :=
⟨a, fun _ s =>
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := h _ s
_root_.trans h₂ h₁⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mk Filter.IsCobounded.mk
/-- A filter which is eventually bounded is in particular frequently bounded (in the opposite
direction). At least if the filter is not trivial. -/
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_flip [IsTrans α r] [NeBot f] : f.IsBounded r → f.IsCobounded (flip r)
| ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
⟨a, fun b hb =>
let ⟨_, rxa, rbx⟩ := (ha.and hb).exists
show r b a from _root_.trans rbx rxa⟩
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_flip Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_ge [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_ge Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_ge
theorem IsBounded.isCobounded_le [Preorder α] [NeBot f] (h : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·)) :
f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
h.isCobounded_flip
#align filter.is_bounded.is_cobounded_le Filter.IsBounded.isCobounded_le
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_flip {l : Filter γ} [IsTrans α r] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder r u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (flip r) u :=
h.isCobounded_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
theorem IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge {u : γ → α} {l : Filter γ} [Preorder α] [NeBot l]
(h : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u) : l.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
h.isCoboundedUnder_flip
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_le ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ᶠ i in l, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
IsBoundedUnder.isCoboundedUnder_ge ⟨x, hf⟩
lemma isCoboundedUnder_le_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, x ≤ f i) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_le_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
lemma isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_le [Preorder α] (l : Filter ι) [NeBot l] {f : ι → α} {x : α}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≤ x) :
IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l f :=
isCoboundedUnder_ge_of_eventually_le l (eventually_of_forall hf)
theorem isCobounded_bot : IsCobounded r ⊥ ↔ ∃ b, ∀ x, r b x := by simp [IsCobounded]
#align filter.is_cobounded_bot Filter.isCobounded_bot
theorem isCobounded_top : IsCobounded r ⊤ ↔ Nonempty α := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [IsCobounded, eq_univ_iff_forall,
exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align filter.is_cobounded_top Filter.isCobounded_top
theorem isCobounded_principal (s : Set α) :
(𝓟 s).IsCobounded r ↔ ∃ b, ∀ a, (∀ x ∈ s, r x a) → r b a := by simp [IsCobounded, subset_def]
#align filter.is_cobounded_principal Filter.isCobounded_principal
theorem IsCobounded.mono (h : f ≤ g) : f.IsCobounded r → g.IsCobounded r
| ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, fun a ha => hb a (h ha)⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded.mono Filter.IsCobounded.mono
end Relation
section Nonempty
variable [Preorder α] [Nonempty α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
theorem isBounded_le_atBot : (atBot : Filter α).IsBounded (· ≤ ·) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨a, eventually_le_atBot _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_le_at_bot Filter.isBounded_le_atBot
theorem isBounded_ge_atTop : (atTop : Filter α).IsBounded (· ≥ ·) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨a, eventually_ge_atTop _⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_ge_at_top Filter.isBounded_ge_atTop
theorem Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot (h : Tendsto u f atBot) : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u :=
isBounded_le_atBot.mono h
#align filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_le_at_bot Filter.Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot
theorem Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop (h : Tendsto u f atTop) : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
isBounded_ge_atTop.mono h
#align filter.tendsto.is_bounded_under_ge_at_top Filter.Tendsto.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop
theorem bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {u : ℕ → α}
(hx : Tendsto u atTop atBot) : BddAbove (Set.range u) :=
hx.isBoundedUnder_le_atBot.bddAbove_range
#align filter.bdd_above_range_of_tendsto_at_top_at_bot Filter.bddAbove_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atBot
theorem bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {u : ℕ → α}
(hx : Tendsto u atTop atTop) : BddBelow (Set.range u) :=
hx.isBoundedUnder_ge_atTop.bddBelow_range
#align filter.bdd_below_range_of_tendsto_at_top_at_top Filter.bddBelow_range_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop
end Nonempty
theorem isCobounded_le_of_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨⊥, fun _ _ => bot_le⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded_le_of_bot Filter.isCobounded_le_of_bot
theorem isCobounded_ge_of_top [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) :=
⟨⊤, fun _ _ => le_top⟩
#align filter.is_cobounded_ge_of_top Filter.isCobounded_ge_of_top
theorem isBounded_le_of_top [Preorder α] [OrderTop α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨⊤, eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_top⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_le_of_top Filter.isBounded_le_of_top
theorem isBounded_ge_of_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {f : Filter α} : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) :=
⟨⊥, eventually_of_forall fun _ => bot_le⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_ge_of_bot Filter.isBounded_ge_of_bot
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (e : α ≃o β) {l : Filter γ}
{u : γ → α} : (IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => e (u x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u :=
(Function.Surjective.exists e.surjective).trans <|
exists_congr fun a => by simp only [eventually_map, e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.is_bounded_under_le_comp OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp
@[simp]
theorem _root_.OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp [Preorder α] [Preorder β] (e : α ≃o β) {l : Filter γ}
{u : γ → α} : (IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => e (u x)) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u :=
OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_le_comp e.dual
#align order_iso.is_bounded_under_ge_comp OrderIso.isBoundedUnder_ge_comp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_inv [OrderedCommGroup α] {l : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => (u x)⁻¹) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l u :=
(OrderIso.inv α).isBoundedUnder_ge_comp
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_inv Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_inv
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_neg Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_inv [OrderedCommGroup α] {l : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) l fun x => (u x)⁻¹) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l u :=
(OrderIso.inv α).isBoundedUnder_le_comp
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_inv Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_inv
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_neg Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_neg
theorem IsBoundedUnder.sup [SemilatticeSup α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u →
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => u a ⊔ v a
| ⟨bu, (hu : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ bu)⟩, ⟨bv, (hv : ∀ᶠ x in f, v x ≤ bv)⟩ =>
⟨bu ⊔ bv, show ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ⊔ v x ≤ bu ⊔ bv
by filter_upwards [hu, hv] with _ using sup_le_sup⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under.sup Filter.IsBoundedUnder.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_sup [SemilatticeSup α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => u a ⊔ v a) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_le <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_sup_left,
h.mono_le <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_sup_right⟩,
fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_sup Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_sup
theorem IsBoundedUnder.inf [SemilatticeInf α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u →
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v → f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun a => u a ⊓ v a :=
IsBoundedUnder.sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.is_bounded_under.inf Filter.IsBoundedUnder.inf
@[simp]
theorem isBoundedUnder_ge_inf [SemilatticeInf α] {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) fun a => u a ⊓ v a) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v :=
isBoundedUnder_le_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.is_bounded_under_ge_inf Filter.isBoundedUnder_ge_inf
theorem isBoundedUnder_le_abs [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} :
(f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) fun a => |u a|) ↔
f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u ∧ f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u :=
isBoundedUnder_le_sup.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl isBoundedUnder_le_neg
#align filter.is_bounded_under_le_abs Filter.isBoundedUnder_le_abs
/-- Filters are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `isBoundedDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hf : f.IsBounded (≥) := by isBoundedDefault)`. -/
macro "isBoundedDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply isCobounded_le_of_bot
| apply isCobounded_ge_of_top
| apply isBounded_le_of_top
| apply isBounded_ge_of_bot)
-- Porting note: The above is a lean 4 reconstruction of (note that applyc is not available (yet?)):
-- unsafe def is_bounded_default : tactic Unit :=
-- tactic.applyc `` is_cobounded_le_of_bot <|>
-- tactic.applyc `` is_cobounded_ge_of_top <|>
-- tactic.applyc `` is_bounded_le_of_top <|> tactic.applyc `` is_bounded_ge_of_bot
-- #align filter.is_bounded_default filter.IsBounded_default
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α]
-- Porting note: Renamed from Limsup and Liminf to limsSup and limsInf
/-- The `limsSup` of a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≤ a`. -/
def limsSup (f : Filter α) : α :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup Filter.limsSup
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
/-- The `limsInf` of a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`,
holds `x ≥ a`. -/
def limsInf (f : Filter α) : α :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf Filter.limsInf
/-- The `limsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the infimum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≤ a`. -/
def limsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsSup (map u f)
#align filter.limsup Filter.limsup
/-- The `liminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f` is the supremum of the `a` such that,
eventually for `f`, holds `u x ≥ a`. -/
def liminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) : α :=
limsInf (map u f)
#align filter.liminf Filter.liminf
/-- The `blimsup` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the infimum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `u x ≤ a` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def blimsup (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a }
#align filter.blimsup Filter.blimsup
/-- The `bliminf` of a function `u` along a filter `f`, bounded by a predicate `p`, is the supremum
of the `a` such that, eventually for `f`, `a ≤ u x` whenever `p x` holds. -/
def bliminf (u : β → α) (f : Filter β) (p : β → Prop) :=
sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x }
#align filter.bliminf Filter.bliminf
section
variable {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop}
theorem limsup_eq : limsup u f = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a } :=
rfl
#align filter.limsup_eq Filter.limsup_eq
theorem liminf_eq : liminf u f = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n } :=
rfl
#align filter.liminf_eq Filter.liminf_eq
theorem blimsup_eq : blimsup u f p = sInf { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ a } :=
rfl
#align filter.blimsup_eq Filter.blimsup_eq
theorem bliminf_eq : bliminf u f p = sSup { a | ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → a ≤ u x } :=
rfl
#align filter.bliminf_eq Filter.bliminf_eq
lemma liminf_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
liminf (u ∘ v) f = liminf u (map v f) := rfl
lemma limsup_comp (u : β → α) (v : γ → β) (f : Filter γ) :
limsup (u ∘ v) f = limsup u (map v f) := rfl
end
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (blimsup u f fun _ => True) = limsup u f := by
simp [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq]
#align filter.blimsup_true Filter.blimsup_true
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_true (f : Filter β) (u : β → α) : (bliminf u f fun _ => True) = liminf u f := by
simp [bliminf_eq, liminf_eq]
#align filter.bliminf_true Filter.bliminf_true
lemma blimsup_eq_limsup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, limsup_eq, eventually_inf_principal, mem_setOf_eq]
lemma bliminf_eq_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf u (f ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f p = limsup (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) := by
rw [blimsup_eq_limsup, limsup, limsup, ← map_map, map_comap_setCoe_val]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype Filter.blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype
theorem bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {p : β → Prop} :
bliminf u f p = liminf (u ∘ ((↑) : { x | p x } → β)) (comap (↑) f) :=
blimsup_eq_limsup_subtype (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype Filter.bliminf_eq_liminf_subtype
theorem limsSup_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_of_le
theorem le_limsInf_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) : a ≤ limsInf f :=
le_csSup hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.le_Liminf_of_le Filter.le_limsInf_of_le
theorem limsup_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ a) : limsup u f ≤ a :=
csInf_le hf h
#align filter.limsup_le_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_of_le
theorem le_liminf_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ u n) : a ≤ liminf u f :=
le_csSup hf h
#align filter.le_liminf_of_le Filter.le_liminf_of_le
theorem le_limsSup_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsSup f :=
le_csInf hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.le_Limsup_of_le Filter.le_limsSup_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_of_le {f : Filter α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ n) → b ≤ a) : limsInf f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_of_le Filter.limsInf_le_of_le
theorem le_limsup_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, u n ≤ b) → a ≤ b) : a ≤ limsup u f :=
le_csInf hf h
#align filter.le_limsup_of_le Filter.le_limsup_of_le
theorem liminf_le_of_le {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ b, (∀ᶠ n in f, b ≤ u n) → b ≤ a) : liminf u f ≤ a :=
csSup_le hf h
#align filter.liminf_le_of_le Filter.liminf_le_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_limsSup {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(h₁ : f.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h₂ : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault):
limsInf f ≤ limsSup f :=
liminf_le_of_le h₂ fun a₀ ha₀ =>
le_limsup_of_le h₁ fun a₁ ha₁ =>
show a₀ ≤ a₁ from
let ⟨_, hb₀, hb₁⟩ := (ha₀.and ha₁).exists
le_trans hb₀ hb₁
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Limsup Filter.limsInf_le_limsSup
theorem liminf_le_limsup {f : Filter β} [NeBot f] {u : β → α}
(h : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(h' : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault):
liminf u f ≤ limsup u f :=
limsInf_le_limsSup h h'
#align filter.liminf_le_limsup Filter.liminf_le_limsup
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in g, n ≤ a) → ∀ᶠ n in f, n ≤ a) : limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
csInf_le_csInf hf hg h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_Limsup Filter.limsSup_le_limsSup
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf {f g : Filter α}
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(h : ∀ a, (∀ᶠ n in f, a ≤ n) → ∀ᶠ n in g, a ≤ n) : limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
csSup_le_csSup hg hf h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Liminf Filter.limsInf_le_limsInf
theorem limsup_le_limsup {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : u ≤ᶠ[f] v)
(hu : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup v f :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hu hv fun _ => h.trans
#align filter.limsup_le_limsup Filter.limsup_le_limsup
theorem liminf_le_liminf {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ v a)
(hu : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hv : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) v := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf v f :=
limsup_le_limsup (β := βᵒᵈ) h hv hu
#align filter.liminf_le_liminf Filter.liminf_le_liminf
theorem limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
(hf : f.IsCobounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBounded (· ≤ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsSup f ≤ limsSup g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_le_Limsup_of_le Filter.limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le
theorem limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
(hf : f.IsBounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCobounded (· ≥ ·) := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsInf f ≤ limsInf g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf hf hg fun _ ha => h ha
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_le_Liminf_of_le Filter.limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le
theorem limsup_le_limsup_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : f ≤ g)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
limsup u f ≤ limsup u g :=
limsSup_le_limsSup_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
#align filter.limsup_le_limsup_of_le Filter.limsup_le_limsup_of_le
theorem liminf_le_liminf_of_le {α β} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f g : Filter α} (h : g ≤ f)
{u : α → β}
(hf : f.IsBoundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault)
(hg : g.IsCoboundedUnder (· ≥ ·) u := by isBoundedDefault) :
liminf u f ≤ liminf u g :=
limsInf_le_limsInf_of_le (map_mono h) hf hg
#align filter.liminf_le_liminf_of_le Filter.liminf_le_liminf_of_le
theorem limsSup_principal {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
limsSup (𝓟 s) = sSup s := by
simp only [limsSup, eventually_principal]; exact csInf_upper_bounds_eq_csSup h hs
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_principal Filter.limsSup_principal
theorem limsInf_principal {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : limsInf (𝓟 s) = sInf s :=
limsSup_principal (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_principal Filter.limsInf_principal
theorem limsup_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : limsup u f = limsup v f := by
rw [limsup_eq]
congr with b
exact eventually_congr (h.mono fun x hx => by simp [hx])
#align filter.limsup_congr Filter.limsup_congr
theorem blimsup_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
blimsup u f p = blimsup v f p := by
simpa only [blimsup_eq_limsup] using limsup_congr <| eventually_inf_principal.2 h
#align filter.blimsup_congr Filter.blimsup_congr
theorem bliminf_congr {f : Filter β} {u v : β → α} {p : β → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ a in f, p a → u a = v a) :
bliminf u f p = bliminf v f p :=
blimsup_congr (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.bliminf_congr Filter.bliminf_congr
theorem liminf_congr {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u v : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ a in f, u a = v a) : liminf u f = liminf v f :=
limsup_congr (β := βᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.liminf_congr Filter.liminf_congr
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : limsup (fun _ => b) f = b := by
simpa only [limsup_eq, eventually_const] using csInf_Ici
#align filter.limsup_const Filter.limsup_const
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const {α : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} [NeBot f]
(b : β) : liminf (fun _ => b) f = b :=
limsup_const (β := βᵒᵈ) b
#align filter.liminf_const Filter.liminf_const
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
liminf f v = sSup (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Iic (f i)) := by
simp_rw [liminf_eq, hv.eventually_iff]
congr
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, iInter_coe_set, mem_iUnion, mem_iInter, mem_Iic, Subtype.exists,
exists_prop]
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
liminf f v = sSup univ := by
simp [hv.eq_bot_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, h'i⟩, liminf_eq]
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_iUnion_iInter {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) :
limsup f v = sInf (⋃ (j : Subtype p), ⋂ (i : s j), Ici (f i)) :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_iUnion_iInter (α := αᵒᵈ) hv
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_sInf_univ_of_empty {f : ι → α} {v : Filter ι}
{p : ι' → Prop} {s : ι' → Set ι} (hv : v.HasBasis p s) (i : ι') (hi : p i) (h'i : s i = ∅) :
limsup f v = sInf univ :=
HasBasis.liminf_eq_sSup_univ_of_empty (α := αᵒᵈ) hv i hi h'i
-- Porting note: simp_nf linter incorrectly says: lhs does not simplify when using simp on itself.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem liminf_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) :
liminf (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop := by
change liminf (f ∘ (· + k)) atTop = liminf f atTop
rw [liminf, liminf, ← map_map, map_add_atTop_eq_nat]
#align filter.liminf_nat_add Filter.liminf_nat_add
-- Porting note: simp_nf linter incorrectly says: lhs does not simplify when using simp on itself.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem limsup_nat_add (f : ℕ → α) (k : ℕ) : limsup (fun i => f (i + k)) atTop = limsup f atTop :=
@liminf_nat_add αᵒᵈ _ f k
#align filter.limsup_nat_add Filter.limsup_nat_add
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
section CompleteLattice
variable [CompleteLattice α]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_bot : limsSup (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sInf_le <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_bot Filter.limsSup_bot
@[simp] theorem limsup_bot (f : β → α) : limsup f ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp [limsup]
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_bot : limsInf (⊥ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sSup <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_bot Filter.limsInf_bot
@[simp] theorem liminf_bot (f : β → α) : liminf f ⊥ = ⊤ := by simp [liminf]
@[simp]
theorem limsSup_top : limsSup (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_sInf <| by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact fun b hb => top_unique <| hb _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_top Filter.limsSup_top
@[simp]
theorem limsInf_top : limsInf (⊤ : Filter α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| sSup_le <| by simp [eq_univ_iff_forall]; exact fun b hb => bot_unique <| hb _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_top Filter.limsInf_top
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (blimsup u f fun _ => False) = ⊥ := by
simp [blimsup_eq]
#align filter.blimsup_false Filter.blimsup_false
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_false {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : (bliminf u f fun _ => False) = ⊤ := by
simp [bliminf_eq]
#align filter.bliminf_false Filter.bliminf_false
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊥` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem limsup_const_bot {f : Filter β} : limsup (fun _ : β => (⊥ : α)) f = (⊥ : α) := by
rw [limsup_eq, eq_bot_iff]
exact sInf_le (eventually_of_forall fun _ => le_rfl)
#align filter.limsup_const_bot Filter.limsup_const_bot
/-- Same as limsup_const applied to `⊤` but without the `NeBot f` assumption -/
@[simp]
theorem liminf_const_top {f : Filter β} : liminf (fun _ : β => (⊤ : α)) f = (⊤ : α) :=
limsup_const_bot (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.liminf_const_top Filter.liminf_const_top
theorem HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s} {f : Filter α} (h : f.HasBasis p s) :
limsSup f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), sSup (s i) :=
le_antisymm (le_iInf₂ fun i hi => sInf_le <| h.eventually_iff.2 ⟨i, hi, fun _ => le_sSup⟩)
(le_sInf fun _ ha =>
let ⟨_, hi, ha⟩ := h.eventually_iff.1 ha
iInf₂_le_of_le _ hi <| sSup_le ha)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.has_basis.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup Filter.HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {f : Filter α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsInf f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), sInf (s i) :=
HasBasis.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.has_basis.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf Filter.HasBasis.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf
theorem limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup {f : Filter α} : limsSup f = ⨅ s ∈ f, sSup s :=
f.basis_sets.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Limsup_eq_infi_Sup Filter.limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup
theorem limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf {f : Filter α} : limsInf f = ⨆ s ∈ f, sInf s :=
limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.Liminf_eq_supr_Inf Filter.limsInf_eq_iSup_sInf
theorem limsup_le_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f ≤ ⨆ n, u n :=
limsup_le_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (eventually_of_forall (le_iSup u))
#align filter.limsup_le_supr Filter.limsup_le_iSup
theorem iInf_le_liminf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : ⨅ n, u n ≤ liminf u f :=
le_liminf_of_le (by isBoundedDefault) (eventually_of_forall (iInf_le u))
#align filter.infi_le_liminf Filter.iInf_le_liminf
/-- In a complete lattice, the limsup of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : limsup u f = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ a ∈ s, u a :=
(f.basis_sets.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i ≥ n, u i :=
(atTop_basis.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, iInf_const]; rfl
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat
theorem limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : limsup u atTop = ⨅ n : ℕ, ⨆ i : ℕ, u (i + n) := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat, iSup_ge_eq_iSup_nat_add]
#align filter.limsup_eq_infi_supr_of_nat' Filter.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat'
theorem HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : limsup u f = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, u a :=
(h.map u).limsSup_eq_iInf_sSup.trans <| by simp only [sSup_image, id]
#align filter.has_basis.limsup_eq_infi_supr Filter.HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup
theorem blimsup_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊥ → (p x ↔ q x)) : blimsup u f p = blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq]
congr with a
refine eventually_congr (h.mono fun b hb => ?_)
rcases eq_or_ne (u b) ⊥ with hu | hu; · simp [hu]
rw [hb hu]
#align filter.blimsup_congr' Filter.blimsup_congr'
theorem bliminf_congr' {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≠ ⊤ → (p x ↔ q x)) : bliminf u f p = bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_congr' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.bliminf_congr' Filter.bliminf_congr'
lemma HasBasis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(hf : f.HasBasis p s) {q : β → Prop} :
blimsup u f q = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), ⨆ a ∈ s i, ⨆ (_ : q a), u a := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, (hf.inf_principal _).limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, mem_inter_iff, iSup_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
blimsup u f p = ⨅ s ∈ f, ⨆ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b := by
simp only [f.basis_sets.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_and', id, and_comm]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr Filter.blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup
theorem blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
blimsup u atTop p = ⨅ i, ⨆ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j := by
simp only [atTop_basis.blimsup_eq_iInf_iSup, @and_comm (p _), iSup_and, mem_Ici, iInf_true]
#align filter.blimsup_eq_infi_bsupr_of_nat Filter.blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat
/-- In a complete lattice, the liminf of a function is the infimum over sets `s` in the filter
of the supremum of the function over `s` -/
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} : liminf u f = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ a ∈ s, u a :=
limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i ≥ n, u i :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ u
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat
theorem liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat' {u : ℕ → α} : liminf u atTop = ⨆ n : ℕ, ⨅ i : ℕ, u (i + n) :=
@limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat' αᵒᵈ _ _
#align filter.liminf_eq_supr_infi_of_nat' Filter.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf_of_nat'
theorem HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set β} {f : Filter β} {u : β → α}
(h : f.HasBasis p s) : liminf u f = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), ⨅ a ∈ s i, u a :=
HasBasis.limsup_eq_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.has_basis.liminf_eq_supr_infi Filter.HasBasis.liminf_eq_iSup_iInf
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf {f : Filter β} {p : β → Prop} {u : β → α} :
bliminf u f p = ⨆ s ∈ f, ⨅ (b) (_ : p b ∧ b ∈ s), u b :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup αᵒᵈ β _ f p u
#align filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi Filter.bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf
theorem bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat {p : ℕ → Prop} {u : ℕ → α} :
bliminf u atTop p = ⨆ i, ⨅ (j) (_ : p j ∧ i ≤ j), u j :=
@blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup_of_nat αᵒᵈ _ p u
#align filter.bliminf_eq_supr_binfi_of_nat Filter.bliminf_eq_iSup_biInf_of_nat
theorem limsup_eq_sInf_sSup {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
limsup a F = sInf ((fun I => sSup (a '' I)) '' F.sets) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [limsup_eq]
refine sInf_le_sInf fun x hx => ?_
rcases (mem_image _ F.sets x).mp hx with ⟨I, ⟨I_mem_F, hI⟩⟩
filter_upwards [I_mem_F] with i hi
exact hI ▸ le_sSup (mem_image_of_mem _ hi)
· refine le_sInf fun b hb => sInf_le_of_le (mem_image_of_mem _ hb) <| sSup_le ?_
rintro _ ⟨_, h, rfl⟩
exact h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.limsup_eq_Inf_Sup Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup
theorem liminf_eq_sSup_sInf {ι R : Type*} (F : Filter ι) [CompleteLattice R] (a : ι → R) :
liminf a F = sSup ((fun I => sInf (a '' I)) '' F.sets) :=
@Filter.limsup_eq_sInf_sSup ι (OrderDual R) _ _ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align filter.liminf_eq_Sup_Inf Filter.liminf_eq_sSup_sInf
theorem liminf_le_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, u a ≤ x) : liminf u f ≤ x := by
rw [liminf_eq]
refine sSup_le fun b hb => ?_
have hbx : ∃ᶠ _ in f, b ≤ x := by
revert h
rw [← not_imp_not, not_frequently, not_frequently]
exact fun h => hb.mp (h.mono fun a hbx hba hax => hbx (hba.trans hax))
exact hbx.exists.choose_spec
#align filter.liminf_le_of_frequently_le' Filter.liminf_le_of_frequently_le'
theorem le_limsup_of_frequently_le' {α β} [CompleteLattice β] {f : Filter α} {u : α → β} {x : β}
(h : ∃ᶠ a in f, x ≤ u a) : x ≤ limsup u f :=
liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (β := βᵒᵈ) h
#align filter.le_limsup_of_frequently_le' Filter.le_limsup_of_frequently_le'
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the limsup of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
@[simp]
theorem CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = limsup (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop := by
rw [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat', map_iInf]
simp_rw [_root_.map_iSup, ← Function.comp_apply (f := f), ← Function.iterate_succ' f,
← Nat.add_succ]
conv_rhs => rw [iInf_split _ (0 < ·)]
simp only [not_lt, Nat.le_zero, iInf_iInf_eq_left, add_zero, iInf_nat_gt_zero_eq, left_eq_inf]
refine (iInf_le (fun i => ⨆ j, f^[j + (i + 1)] a) 0).trans ?_
simp only [zero_add, Function.comp_apply, iSup_le_iff]
exact fun i => le_iSup (fun i => f^[i] a) (i + 1)
#align filter.complete_lattice_hom.apply_limsup_iterate Filter.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_limsup_iterate
/-- If `f : α → α` is a morphism of complete lattices, then the liminf of its iterates of any
`a : α` is a fixed point. -/
theorem CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate (f : CompleteLatticeHom α α) (a : α) :
f (liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop) = liminf (fun n => f^[n] a) atTop :=
apply_limsup_iterate (CompleteLatticeHom.dual f) _
#align filter.complete_lattice_hom.apply_liminf_iterate Filter.CompleteLatticeHom.apply_liminf_iterate
variable {f g : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u v : β → α}
theorem blimsup_mono (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f q :=
sInf_le_sInf fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
#align filter.blimsup_mono Filter.blimsup_mono
theorem bliminf_antitone (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun a ha => ha.mono <| by tauto
#align filter.bliminf_antitone Filter.bliminf_antitone
theorem mono_blimsup' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.2 hx').trans (hx.1 hx')
#align filter.mono_blimsup' Filter.mono_blimsup'
theorem mono_blimsup (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup v f p :=
mono_blimsup' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align filter.mono_blimsup Filter.mono_blimsup
theorem mono_bliminf' (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => (ha.and h).mono fun _ hx hx' => (hx.1 hx').trans (hx.2 hx')
#align filter.mono_bliminf' Filter.mono_bliminf'
theorem mono_bliminf (h : ∀ x, p x → u x ≤ v x) : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf v f p :=
mono_bliminf' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align filter.mono_bliminf Filter.mono_bliminf
theorem bliminf_antitone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : bliminf u g p ≤ bliminf u f p :=
sSup_le_sSup fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
#align filter.bliminf_antitone_filter Filter.bliminf_antitone_filter
theorem blimsup_monotone_filter (h : f ≤ g) : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u g p :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ha => ha.filter_mono h
#align filter.blimsup_monotone_filter Filter.blimsup_monotone_filter
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux versions below
theorem blimsup_and_le_inf : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p ⊓ blimsup u f q :=
le_inf (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
#align filter.blimsup_and_le_inf Filter.blimsup_and_le_inf
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_left :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f p :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_inf_aux_right :
(blimsup u f fun x => p x ∧ q x) ≤ blimsup u f q :=
blimsup_and_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux simp version below
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and : bliminf u f p ⊔ bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
blimsup_and_le_inf (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_sup_le_and Filter.bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_left : bliminf u f p ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_and_aux_right : bliminf u f q ≤ bliminf u f fun x => p x ∧ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans bliminf_sup_le_and
/-- See also `Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux simp versions below
theorem blimsup_sup_le_or : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
sup_le (blimsup_mono <| by tauto) (blimsup_mono <| by tauto)
#align filter.blimsup_sup_le_or Filter.blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_left : blimsup u f p ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_left.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_sup_le_or_aux_right : blimsup u f q ≤ blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x :=
le_sup_right.trans blimsup_sup_le_or
/-- See also `Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf`. -/
--@[simp] -- Porting note: simp_nf linter, lhs simplifies, added _aux simp versions below
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_sup_le_or (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_or_le_inf Filter.bliminf_or_le_inf
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_left : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f p :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_le_inf_aux_right : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) ≤ bliminf u f q :=
bliminf_or_le_inf.trans inf_le_right
/- Porting note: Replaced `e` with `DFunLike.coe e` to override the strange
coercion to `↑(RelIso.toRelEmbedding e).toEmbedding`. -/
theorem OrderIso.apply_blimsup [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
DFunLike.coe e (blimsup u f p) = blimsup ((DFunLike.coe e) ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq, map_sInf, Function.comp_apply]
congr
ext c
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := e.surjective c
simp
#align filter.order_iso.apply_blimsup Filter.OrderIso.apply_blimsup
theorem OrderIso.apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (e : α ≃o γ) :
e (bliminf u f p) = bliminf (e ∘ u) f p :=
OrderIso.apply_blimsup (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) e.dual
#align filter.order_iso.apply_bliminf Filter.OrderIso.apply_bliminf
theorem SupHom.apply_blimsup_le [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sSupHom α γ) :
g (blimsup u f p) ≤ blimsup (g ∘ u) f p := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_iInf_biSup, Function.comp]
refine ((OrderHomClass.mono g).map_iInf₂_le _).trans ?_
simp only [_root_.map_iSup, le_refl]
#align filter.Sup_hom.apply_blimsup_le Filter.SupHom.apply_blimsup_le
theorem InfHom.le_apply_bliminf [CompleteLattice γ] (g : sInfHom α γ) :
bliminf (g ∘ u) f p ≤ g (bliminf u f p) :=
SupHom.apply_blimsup_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) (sInfHom.dual g)
#align filter.Inf_hom.le_apply_bliminf Filter.InfHom.le_apply_bliminf
end CompleteLattice
section CompleteDistribLattice
variable [CompleteDistribLattice α] {f : Filter β} {p q : β → Prop} {u : β → α}
lemma limsup_sup_filter {g} : limsup u (f ⊔ g) = limsup u f ⊔ limsup u g := by
refine le_antisymm ?_
(sup_le (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_left) (limsup_le_limsup_of_le le_sup_right))
simp_rw [limsup_eq, sInf_sup_eq, sup_sInf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, le_iInf₂_iff]
intro a ha b hb
exact sInf_le ⟨ha.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_left, hb.mono fun _ h ↦ h.trans le_sup_right⟩
lemma liminf_sup_filter {g} : liminf u (f ⊔ g) = liminf u f ⊓ liminf u g :=
limsup_sup_filter (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
theorem blimsup_or_eq_sup : (blimsup u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f q := by
simp only [blimsup_eq_limsup, ← limsup_sup_filter, ← inf_sup_left, sup_principal, setOf_or]
#align filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup Filter.blimsup_or_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem bliminf_or_eq_inf : (bliminf u f fun x => p x ∨ q x) = bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f q :=
blimsup_or_eq_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf Filter.bliminf_or_eq_inf
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_sup_not : blimsup u f p ⊔ blimsup u f (¬p ·) = limsup u f := by
simp_rw [← blimsup_or_eq_sup, or_not, blimsup_true]
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_inf_not : bliminf u f p ⊓ bliminf u f (¬p ·) = liminf u f :=
blimsup_sup_not (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp]
lemma blimsup_not_sup : blimsup u f (¬p ·) ⊔ blimsup u f p = limsup u f := by
simpa only [not_not] using blimsup_sup_not (p := (¬p ·))
@[simp]
lemma bliminf_not_inf : bliminf u f (¬p ·) ⊓ bliminf u f p = liminf u f :=
blimsup_not_sup (α := αᵒᵈ)
lemma limsup_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
limsup (s.piecewise u v) f = blimsup u f (· ∈ s) ⊔ blimsup v f (· ∉ s) := by
rw [← blimsup_sup_not (p := (· ∈ s))]
refine congr_arg₂ _ (blimsup_congr ?_) (blimsup_congr ?_) <;>
filter_upwards with _ h using by simp [h]
lemma liminf_piecewise {s : Set β} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {v} :
liminf (s.piecewise u v) f = bliminf u f (· ∈ s) ⊓ bliminf v f (· ∉ s) :=
limsup_piecewise (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem sup_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊔ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, iSup_sup_eq, sup_iInf₂_eq]
congr; ext s; congr; ext hs; congr
exact (biSup_const (nonempty_of_mem hs)).symm
#align filter.sup_limsup Filter.sup_limsup
theorem inf_liminf [NeBot f] (a : α) : a ⊓ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_limsup (α := αᵒᵈ) a
#align filter.inf_liminf Filter.inf_liminf
theorem sup_liminf (a : α) : a ⊔ liminf u f = liminf (fun x => a ⊔ u x) f := by
simp only [liminf_eq_iSup_iInf]
rw [sup_comm, biSup_sup (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [iInf₂_sup_eq, sup_comm (a := a)]
#align filter.sup_liminf Filter.sup_liminf
theorem inf_limsup (a : α) : a ⊓ limsup u f = limsup (fun x => a ⊓ u x) f :=
sup_liminf (α := αᵒᵈ) a
#align filter.inf_limsup Filter.inf_limsup
end CompleteDistribLattice
section CompleteBooleanAlgebra
variable [CompleteBooleanAlgebra α] (f : Filter β) (u : β → α)
theorem limsup_compl : (limsup u f)ᶜ = liminf (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
#align filter.limsup_compl Filter.limsup_compl
theorem liminf_compl : (liminf u f)ᶜ = limsup (compl ∘ u) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, compl_iInf, compl_iSup, liminf_eq_iSup_iInf, Function.comp_apply]
#align filter.liminf_compl Filter.liminf_compl
theorem limsup_sdiff (a : α) : limsup u f \ a = limsup (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [limsup_eq_iInf_iSup, sdiff_eq]
rw [biInf_inf (⟨univ, univ_mem⟩ : ∃ i : Set β, i ∈ f)]
simp_rw [inf_comm, inf_iSup₂_eq, inf_comm]
#align filter.limsup_sdiff Filter.limsup_sdiff
theorem liminf_sdiff [NeBot f] (a : α) : liminf u f \ a = liminf (fun b => u b \ a) f := by
simp only [sdiff_eq, inf_comm _ aᶜ, inf_liminf]
#align filter.liminf_sdiff Filter.liminf_sdiff
theorem sdiff_limsup [NeBot f] (a : α) : a \ limsup u f = liminf (fun b => a \ u b) f := by
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, liminf_compl, (· ∘ ·), compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_limsup]
#align filter.sdiff_limsup Filter.sdiff_limsup
| Mathlib/Order/LiminfLimsup.lean | 1,191 | 1,193 | theorem sdiff_liminf (a : α) : a \ liminf u f = limsup (fun b => a \ u b) f := by |
rw [← compl_inj_iff]
simp only [sdiff_eq, limsup_compl, (· ∘ ·), compl_inf, compl_compl, sup_liminf]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.ExteriorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.contraction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Contraction in Clifford Algebras
This file contains some of the results from [grinberg_clifford_2016][].
The key result is `CliffordAlgebra.equivExterior`.
## Main definitions
* `CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft`: contract a multivector by a `Module.Dual R M` on the left.
* `CliffordAlgebra.contractRight`: contract a multivector by a `Module.Dual R M` on the right.
* `CliffordAlgebra.changeForm`: convert between two algebras of different quadratic form, sending
vectors to vectors. The difference of the quadratic forms must be a bilinear form.
* `CliffordAlgebra.equivExterior`: in characteristic not-two, the `CliffordAlgebra Q` is
isomorphic as a module to the exterior algebra.
## Implementation notes
This file somewhat follows [grinberg_clifford_2016][], although we are missing some of the induction
principles needed to prove many of the results. Here, we avoid the quotient-based approach described
in [grinberg_clifford_2016][], instead directly constructing our objects using the universal
property.
Note that [grinberg_clifford_2016][] concludes that its contents are not novel, and are in fact just
a rehash of parts of [bourbaki2007][]; we should at some point consider swapping our references to
refer to the latter.
Within this file, we use the local notation
* `x ⌊ d` for `contractRight x d`
* `d ⌋ x` for `contractLeft d x`
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R : Type u1} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type u2} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section contractLeft
variable (d d' : Module.Dual R M)
/-- Auxiliary construction for `CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft` -/
@[simps!]
def contractLeftAux (d : Module.Dual R M) :
M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q × CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
haveI v_mul := (Algebra.lmul R (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q
d.smulRight (LinearMap.fst _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) (CliffordAlgebra Q)) -
v_mul.compl₂ (LinearMap.snd _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) _)
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_aux CliffordAlgebra.contractLeftAux
theorem contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux (v : M) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (fx : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractLeftAux Q d v (ι Q v * x, contractLeftAux Q d v (x, fx)) = Q v • fx := by
simp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← sub_add, mul_smul_comm, sub_self,
zero_add]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_aux_contract_left_aux CliffordAlgebra.contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux
variable {Q}
/-- Contract an element of the clifford algebra with an element `d : Module.Dual R M` from the left.
Note that $v ⌋ x$ is spelt `contractLeft (Q.associated v) x`.
This includes [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 10.75 -/
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q where
toFun d := foldr' Q (contractLeftAux Q d) (contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d) 0
map_add' d₁ d₂ :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [LinearMap.add_apply]
induction' x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with r x y hx hy m x hx
· simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero, zero_add]
· rw [map_add, map_add, map_add, add_add_add_comm, hx, hy]
· rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [sub_add_sub_comm, mul_add, LinearMap.add_apply, add_smul]
map_smul' c d :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
induction' x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with r x y hx hy m x hx
· simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero]
· rw [map_add, map_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
· rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_assoc, mul_smul_comm, smul_sub]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft
/-- Contract an element of the clifford algebra with an element `d : Module.Dual R M` from the
right.
Note that $x ⌊ v$ is spelt `contractRight x (Q.associated v)`.
This includes [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 16.75 -/
def contractRight : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearMap.flip (LinearMap.compl₂ (LinearMap.compr₂ contractLeft reverse) reverse)
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right CliffordAlgebra.contractRight
theorem contractRight_eq (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractRight (Q := Q) x d = reverse (contractLeft (R := R) (M := M) d <| reverse x) :=
rfl
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_eq CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_eq
local infixl:70 "⌋" => contractLeft (R := R) (M := M)
local infixl:70 "⌊" => contractRight (R := R) (M := M) (Q := Q)
-- Porting note: Lean needs to be reminded of this instance otherwise the statement of the
-- next result times out
instance : SMul R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := inferInstance
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 6 -/
theorem contractLeft_ι_mul (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(ι Q a * b) = d a • b - ι Q a * (d⌋b) := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine foldr'_ι_mul _ _ ?_ _ _ _
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_ι_mul CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_ι_mul
/-- This is [grinberg_clifford_2016][] Theorem 12 -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 138 | 141 | theorem contractRight_mul_ι (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
b * ι Q a⌊d = d a • b - b⌊d * ι Q a := by |
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractLeft_ι_mul, map_sub, map_smul,
reverse_reverse, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractRight_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Adjugate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.nonsingular_inverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"722b3b152ddd5e0cf21c0a29787c76596cb6b422"
/-!
# Nonsingular inverses
In this file, we define an inverse for square matrices of invertible determinant.
For matrices that are not square or not of full rank, there is a more general notion of
pseudoinverses which we do not consider here.
The definition of inverse used in this file is the adjugate divided by the determinant.
We show that dividing the adjugate by `det A` (if possible), giving a matrix `A⁻¹` (`nonsing_inv`),
will result in a multiplicative inverse to `A`.
Note that there are at least three different inverses in mathlib:
* `A⁻¹` (`Inv.inv`): alone, this satisfies no properties, although it is usually used in
conjunction with `Group` or `GroupWithZero`. On matrices, this is defined to be zero when no
inverse exists.
* `⅟A` (`invOf`): this is only available in the presence of `[Invertible A]`, which guarantees an
inverse exists.
* `Ring.inverse A`: this is defined on any `MonoidWithZero`, and just like `⁻¹` on matrices, is
defined to be zero when no inverse exists.
We start by working with `Invertible`, and show the main results:
* `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible`
* `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible`
* `Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det`
* `Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm`
After this we define `Matrix.inv` and show it matches `⅟A` and `Ring.inverse A`.
The rest of the results in the file are then about `A⁻¹`
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer's_rule#Finding_inverse_matrix
## Tags
matrix inverse, cramer, cramer's rule, adjugate
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u u' v
variable {l : Type*} {m : Type u} {n : Type u'} {α : Type v}
open Matrix Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset
/-! ### Matrices are `Invertible` iff their determinants are -/
section Invertible
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
/-- If `A.det` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A`. -/
def invertibleOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : Invertible A where
invOf := ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [mul_smul_comm, mul_adjugate, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [smul_mul_assoc, adjugate_mul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
#align matrix.invertible_of_det_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible
theorem invOf_eq [Invertible A.det] [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = ⅟ A.det • A.adjugate := by
letI := invertibleOfDetInvertible A
convert (rfl : ⅟ A = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_eq Matrix.invOf_eq
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a left inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
#align matrix.det_invertible_of_left_inverse Matrix.detInvertibleOfLeftInverse
/-- `A.det` is invertible if `A` has a right inverse. -/
def detInvertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A.det where
invOf := B.det
mul_invOf_self := by rw [← det_mul, h, det_one]
invOf_mul_self := by rw [mul_comm, ← det_mul, h, det_one]
#align matrix.det_invertible_of_right_inverse Matrix.detInvertibleOfRightInverse
/-- If `A` has a constructive inverse, produce one for `A.det`. -/
def detInvertibleOfInvertible [Invertible A] : Invertible A.det :=
detInvertibleOfLeftInverse A (⅟ A) (invOf_mul_self _)
#align matrix.det_invertible_of_invertible Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible
theorem det_invOf [Invertible A] [Invertible A.det] : (⅟ A).det = ⅟ A.det := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
convert (rfl : _ = ⅟ A.det)
#align matrix.det_inv_of Matrix.det_invOf
/-- Together `Matrix.detInvertibleOfInvertible` and `Matrix.invertibleOfDetInvertible` form an
equivalence, although both sides of the equiv are subsingleton anyway. -/
@[simps]
def invertibleEquivDetInvertible : Invertible A ≃ Invertible A.det where
toFun := @detInvertibleOfInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
invFun := @invertibleOfDetInvertible _ _ _ _ _ A
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.invertible_equiv_det_invertible Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible
variable {A B}
theorem mul_eq_one_comm : A * B = 1 ↔ B * A = 1 :=
suffices ∀ A B : Matrix n n α, A * B = 1 → B * A = 1 from ⟨this A B, this B A⟩
fun A B h => by
letI : Invertible B.det := detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h
letI : Invertible B := invertibleOfDetInvertible B
calc
B * A = B * A * (B * ⅟ B) := by rw [mul_invOf_self, Matrix.mul_one]
_ = B * (A * B * ⅟ B) := by simp only [Matrix.mul_assoc]
_ = B * ⅟ B := by rw [h, Matrix.one_mul]
_ = 1 := mul_invOf_self B
#align matrix.mul_eq_one_comm Matrix.mul_eq_one_comm
variable (A B)
/-- We can construct an instance of invertible A if A has a left inverse. -/
def invertibleOfLeftInverse (h : B * A = 1) : Invertible A :=
⟨B, h, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h⟩
#align matrix.invertible_of_left_inverse Matrix.invertibleOfLeftInverse
/-- We can construct an instance of invertible A if A has a right inverse. -/
def invertibleOfRightInverse (h : A * B = 1) : Invertible A :=
⟨B, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h, h⟩
#align matrix.invertible_of_right_inverse Matrix.invertibleOfRightInverse
/-- Given a proof that `A.det` has a constructive inverse, lift `A` to `(Matrix n n α)ˣ`-/
def unitOfDetInvertible [Invertible A.det] : (Matrix n n α)ˣ :=
@unitOfInvertible _ _ A (invertibleOfDetInvertible A)
#align matrix.unit_of_det_invertible Matrix.unitOfDetInvertible
/-- When lowered to a prop, `Matrix.invertibleEquivDetInvertible` forms an `iff`. -/
theorem isUnit_iff_isUnit_det : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit A.det := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, (invertibleEquivDetInvertible A).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_iff_is_unit_det Matrix.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det
@[simp]
theorem isUnits_det_units (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : IsUnit (A : Matrix n n α).det :=
isUnit_iff_isUnit_det _ |>.mp A.isUnit
/-! #### Variants of the statements above with `IsUnit`-/
theorem isUnit_det_of_invertible [Invertible A] : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfInvertible A)
#align matrix.is_unit_det_of_invertible Matrix.isUnit_det_of_invertible
variable {A B}
theorem isUnit_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A :=
⟨⟨A, B, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align matrix.is_unit_of_left_inverse Matrix.isUnit_of_left_inverse
theorem exists_left_inverse_iff_isUnit : (∃ B, B * A = 1) ↔ IsUnit A :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ isUnit_of_left_inverse h, fun h ↦ have := h.invertible; ⟨⅟A, invOf_mul_self' A⟩⟩
theorem isUnit_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A :=
⟨⟨A, B, h, mul_eq_one_comm.mp h⟩, rfl⟩
#align matrix.is_unit_of_right_inverse Matrix.isUnit_of_right_inverse
theorem exists_right_inverse_iff_isUnit : (∃ B, A * B = 1) ↔ IsUnit A :=
⟨fun ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ isUnit_of_right_inverse h, fun h ↦ have := h.invertible; ⟨⅟A, mul_invOf_self' A⟩⟩
theorem isUnit_det_of_left_inverse (h : B * A = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfLeftInverse _ _ h)
#align matrix.is_unit_det_of_left_inverse Matrix.isUnit_det_of_left_inverse
theorem isUnit_det_of_right_inverse (h : A * B = 1) : IsUnit A.det :=
@isUnit_of_invertible _ _ _ (detInvertibleOfRightInverse _ _ h)
#align matrix.is_unit_det_of_right_inverse Matrix.isUnit_det_of_right_inverse
theorem det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : B * A = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_left_inverse h).ne_zero
#align matrix.det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse Matrix.det_ne_zero_of_left_inverse
theorem det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse [Nontrivial α] (h : A * B = 1) : A.det ≠ 0 :=
(isUnit_det_of_right_inverse h).ne_zero
#align matrix.det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse Matrix.det_ne_zero_of_right_inverse
end Invertible
section Inv
variable [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] [CommRing α]
variable (A : Matrix n n α) (B : Matrix n n α)
theorem isUnit_det_transpose (h : IsUnit A.det) : IsUnit Aᵀ.det := by
rw [det_transpose]
exact h
#align matrix.is_unit_det_transpose Matrix.isUnit_det_transpose
/-! ### A noncomputable `Inv` instance -/
/-- The inverse of a square matrix, when it is invertible (and zero otherwise). -/
noncomputable instance inv : Inv (Matrix n n α) :=
⟨fun A => Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate⟩
theorem inv_def (A : Matrix n n α) : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A.det • A.adjugate :=
rfl
#align matrix.inv_def Matrix.inv_def
theorem nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit (h : ¬IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = 0 := by
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, zero_smul]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_apply_not_is_unit Matrix.nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit
theorem nonsing_inv_apply (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ = (↑h.unit⁻¹ : α) • A.adjugate := by
rw [inv_def, ← Ring.inverse_unit h.unit, IsUnit.unit_spec]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_apply Matrix.nonsing_inv_apply
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as `invOf` when `A` is invertible. -/
@[simp]
theorem invOf_eq_nonsing_inv [Invertible A] : ⅟ A = A⁻¹ := by
letI := detInvertibleOfInvertible A
rw [inv_def, Ring.inverse_invertible, invOf_eq]
#align matrix.inv_of_eq_nonsing_inv Matrix.invOf_eq_nonsing_inv
/-- Coercing the result of `Units.instInv` is the same as coercing first and applying the
nonsingular inverse. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_units_inv (A : (Matrix n n α)ˣ) : ↑A⁻¹ = (A⁻¹ : Matrix n n α) := by
letI := A.invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_units]
#align matrix.coe_units_inv Matrix.coe_units_inv
/-- The nonsingular inverse is the same as the general `Ring.inverse`. -/
theorem nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse : A⁻¹ = Ring.inverse A := by
by_cases h_det : IsUnit A.det
· cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h_det).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, Ring.inverse_invertible]
· have h := mt A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mp h_det
rw [Ring.inverse_non_unit _ h, nonsing_inv_apply_not_isUnit A h_det]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse Matrix.nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse
theorem transpose_nonsing_inv : A⁻¹ᵀ = Aᵀ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, transpose_smul, det_transpose, adjugate_transpose]
#align matrix.transpose_nonsing_inv Matrix.transpose_nonsing_inv
theorem conjTranspose_nonsing_inv [StarRing α] : A⁻¹ᴴ = Aᴴ⁻¹ := by
rw [inv_def, inv_def, conjTranspose_smul, det_conjTranspose, adjugate_conjTranspose,
Ring.inverse_star]
#align matrix.conj_transpose_nonsing_inv Matrix.conjTranspose_nonsing_inv
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a right inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_nonsing_inv (h : IsUnit A.det) : A * A⁻¹ = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, mul_invOf_self]
#align matrix.mul_nonsing_inv Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv
/-- The `nonsing_inv` of `A` is a left inverse. -/
@[simp]
theorem nonsing_inv_mul (h : IsUnit A.det) : A⁻¹ * A = 1 := by
cases (A.isUnit_iff_isUnit_det.mpr h).nonempty_invertible
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_mul_self]
#align matrix.nonsing_inv_mul Matrix.nonsing_inv_mul
instance [Invertible A] : Invertible A⁻¹ := by
rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv]
infer_instance
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/NonsingularInverse.lean | 281 | 282 | theorem inv_inv_of_invertible [Invertible A] : A⁻¹⁻¹ = A := by |
simp only [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_invOf]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations
#align_import ring_theory.quotient_nilpotent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"da420a8c6dd5bdfb85c4ced85c34388f633bc6ff"
/-!
# Nilpotent elements in quotient rings
-/
theorem Ideal.isRadical_iff_quotient_reduced {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (I : Ideal R) :
I.IsRadical ↔ IsReduced (R ⧸ I) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← @Ideal.mk_ker R _ I]
exact RingHom.ker_isRadical_iff_reduced_of_surjective (@Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective R _ I)
#align ideal.is_radical_iff_quotient_reduced Ideal.isRadical_iff_quotient_reduced
variable {R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (I : Ideal S)
/-- Let `P` be a property on ideals. If `P` holds for square-zero ideals, and if
`P I → P (J ⧸ I) → P J`, then `P` holds for all nilpotent ideals. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/QuotientNilpotent.lean | 26 | 51 | theorem Ideal.IsNilpotent.induction_on (hI : IsNilpotent I)
{P : ∀ ⦃S : Type _⦄ [CommRing S], Ideal S → Prop}
(h₁ : ∀ ⦃S : Type _⦄ [CommRing S], ∀ I : Ideal S, I ^ 2 = ⊥ → P I)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃S : Type _⦄ [CommRing S], ∀ I J : Ideal S, I ≤ J → P I →
P (J.map (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)) → P J) :
P I := by |
obtain ⟨n, hI : I ^ n = ⊥⟩ := hI
induction' n using Nat.strong_induction_on with n H generalizing S
by_cases hI' : I = ⊥
· subst hI'
apply h₁
rw [← Ideal.zero_eq_bot, zero_pow two_ne_zero]
cases' n with n
· rw [pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top] at hI
haveI := subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top hI.symm
exact (hI' (Subsingleton.elim _ _)).elim
cases' n with n
· rw [pow_one] at hI
exact (hI' hI).elim
apply h₂ (I ^ 2) _ (Ideal.pow_le_self two_ne_zero)
· apply H n.succ _ (I ^ 2)
· rw [← pow_mul, eq_bot_iff, ← hI, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (by omega)
· exact n.succ.lt_succ_self
· apply h₁
rw [← Ideal.map_pow, Ideal.map_quotient_self]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_symm_diff toDual_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_bihimp ofDual_bihimp
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
#align symm_diff_comm symmDiff_comm
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
#align symm_diff_is_comm symmDiff_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
#align symm_diff_self symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_bot symmDiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
#align bot_symm_diff bot_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
#align symm_diff_eq_bot symmDiff_eq_bot
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_le symmDiff_of_le
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_ge symmDiff_of_ge
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
#align symm_diff_le symmDiff_le
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align symm_diff_le_iff symmDiff_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
#align symm_diff_le_sup symmDiff_le_sup
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.symm_diff_eq_sup Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff symmDiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_inf symmDiff_sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
#align symm_diff_sdiff_eq_sup symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_eq_sup sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
#align symm_diff_sup_inf symmDiff_sup_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align inf_sup_symm_diff inf_sup_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
#align symm_diff_symm_diff_inf symmDiff_symmDiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
#align inf_symm_diff_symm_diff inf_symmDiff_symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_triangle symmDiff_triangle
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_bihimp toDual_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_symm_diff ofDual_symmDiff
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
#align bihimp_comm bihimp_comm
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
#align bihimp_is_comm bihimp_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
#align bihimp_self bihimp_self
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
#align bihimp_top bihimp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
#align top_bihimp top_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_eq_top bihimp_eq_top
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
#align bihimp_of_le bihimp_of_le
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
#align bihimp_of_ge bihimp_of_ge
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
#align le_bihimp le_bihimp
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
#align le_bihimp_iff le_bihimp_iff
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
#align inf_le_bihimp inf_le_bihimp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
#align bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
#align himp_bihimp himp_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
#align sup_himp_bihimp sup_himp_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_himp_eq_inf bihimp_himp_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align himp_bihimp_eq_inf himp_bihimp_eq_inf
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_inf_sup bihimp_inf_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align sup_inf_bihimp sup_inf_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align bihimp_bihimp_sup bihimp_bihimp_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
#align sup_bihimp_bihimp sup_bihimp_bihimp
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
#align bihimp_triangle bihimp_triangle
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_top' symmDiff_top'
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
#align top_symm_diff' top_symmDiff'
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
#align hnot_symm_diff_self hnot_symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
#align symm_diff_hnot_self symmDiff_hnot_self
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
#align is_compl.symm_diff_eq_top IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
#align bihimp_bot bihimp_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
#align bot_bihimp bot_bihimp
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align compl_bihimp_self compl_bihimp_self
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
#align bihimp_hnot_self bihimp_hnot_self
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
#align is_compl.bihimp_eq_bot IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
#align sup_sdiff_symm_diff sup_sdiff_symmDiff
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
#align disjoint_symm_diff_inf disjoint_symmDiff_inf
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
#align inf_symm_diff_distrib_left inf_symmDiff_distrib_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
#align inf_symm_diff_distrib_right inf_symmDiff_distrib_right
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
#align sdiff_symm_diff sdiff_symmDiff
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
#align sdiff_symm_diff' sdiff_symmDiff'
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_left symmDiff_sdiff_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff_right symmDiff_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_left sdiff_symmDiff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
#align sdiff_symm_diff_right sdiff_symmDiff_right
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
#align symm_diff_eq_sup symmDiff_eq_sup
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 450 | 453 | theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
exact disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (le_sdiff_iff.1 <| inf_le_of_left_le h).le
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpOrder
#align_import measure_theory.function.l1_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ccdbfb6e5614667af5aa3ab2d50885e0ef44a46f"
/-!
# Integrable functions and `L¹` space
In the first part of this file, the predicate `Integrable` is defined and basic properties of
integrable functions are proved.
Such a predicate is already available under the name `Memℒp 1`. We give a direct definition which
is easier to use, and show that it is equivalent to `Memℒp 1`
In the second part, we establish an API between `Integrable` and the space `L¹` of equivalence
classes of integrable functions, already defined as a special case of `L^p` spaces for `p = 1`.
## Notation
* `α →₁[μ] β` is the type of `L¹` space, where `α` is a `MeasureSpace` and `β` is a
`NormedAddCommGroup` with a `SecondCountableTopology`. `f : α →ₘ β` is a "function" in `L¹`.
In comments, `[f]` is also used to denote an `L¹` function.
`₁` can be typed as `\1`.
## Main definitions
* Let `f : α → β` be a function, where `α` is a `MeasureSpace` and `β` a `NormedAddCommGroup`.
Then `HasFiniteIntegral f` means `(∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊) < ∞`.
* If `β` is moreover a `MeasurableSpace` then `f` is called `Integrable` if
`f` is `Measurable` and `HasFiniteIntegral f` holds.
## Implementation notes
To prove something for an arbitrary integrable function, a useful theorem is
`Integrable.induction` in the file `SetIntegral`.
## Tags
integrable, function space, l1
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : Measure α} [MeasurableSpace δ]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup β]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup γ]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-! ### Some results about the Lebesgue integral involving a normed group -/
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by simp only [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist (f : α → β) :
∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ := by
simp only [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist MeasureTheory.lintegral_norm_eq_lintegral_edist
theorem lintegral_edist_triangle {f g h : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hh : AEStronglyMeasurable h μ) :
(∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (h a) ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, edist (g a) (h a) ∂μ := by
rw [← lintegral_add_left' (hf.edist hh)]
refine lintegral_mono fun a => ?_
apply edist_triangle_right
#align measure_theory.lintegral_edist_triangle MeasureTheory.lintegral_edist_triangle
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_zero : (∫⁻ _ : α, ‖(0 : β)‖₊ ∂μ) = 0 := by simp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_zero
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_left {f : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (g : α → γ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_left' hf.ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_left
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_add_right (f : α → β) {g : α → γ} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_right' _ hg.ennnorm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_add_right
theorem lintegral_nnnorm_neg {f : α → β} : (∫⁻ a, ‖(-f) a‖₊ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp only [Pi.neg_apply, nnnorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_nnnorm_neg
/-! ### The predicate `HasFiniteIntegral` -/
/-- `HasFiniteIntegral f μ` means that the integral `∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ` is finite.
`HasFiniteIntegral f` means `HasFiniteIntegral f volume`. -/
def HasFiniteIntegral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
(∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ ((∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ) < ∞) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_norm MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, edist (f a) 0 ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, edist_dist, dist_zero_right]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_edist MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) < ∞ := by
rw [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_ae_nonneg h]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_real MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ ↔ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) < ∞ := by
simp [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_iff_of_nnreal MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofNNReal
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : HasFiniteIntegral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ ‖g a‖) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ := by
simp only [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm] at *
calc
(∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal ‖g a‖ ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun a h => ofReal_le_ofReal h)
_ < ∞ := hg
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : HasFiniteIntegral g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hg.mono <| h.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono' MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono'
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hf.mono <| EventuallyEq.le <| EventuallyEq.symm h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.congr' MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.congr'
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr' h, fun hg => hg.congr' <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_congr' MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_congr'
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hf.congr' <| h.fun_comp norm
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.congr MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.congr
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral g μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_congr' <| h.fun_comp norm
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_congr MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_congr
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff {c : β} :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ := by
simp [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_const, lt_top_iff_ne_top, ENNReal.mul_eq_top,
or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_const_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : β) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => c) μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff.2 (Or.inr <| measure_lt_top _ _)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_const MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_const
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {C : ℝ}
(hC : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ C) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
(hasFiniteIntegral_const C).mono' hC
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_of_bounded MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.of_finite [Finite α] [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
let ⟨_⟩ := nonempty_fintype α
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded <| ae_of_all μ <| norm_le_pi_norm f
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias hasFiniteIntegral_of_fintype := HasFiniteIntegral.of_finite
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono' hμ le_rfl) h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mono_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : HasFiniteIntegral f μ)
(hν : HasFiniteIntegral f ν) : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_add_measure] at *
exact add_lt_top.2 ⟨hμ, hν⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_right <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.left_of_add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ν :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_left <| le_rfl
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.right_of_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_add_measure {f : α → β} :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ + ν) ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ ∧ HasFiniteIntegral f ν :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_add_measure
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞}
(hc : c ≠ ∞) : HasFiniteIntegral f (c • μ) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_smul_measure] at *
exact mul_lt_top hc h.ne
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.smul_measure MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.smul_measure
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (0 : Measure α) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_zero_measure, zero_lt_top]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_zero_measure MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure
variable (α β μ)
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_zero : HasFiniteIntegral (fun _ : α => (0 : β)) μ := by
simp [HasFiniteIntegral]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_zero MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_zero
variable {α β μ}
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.neg {f : α → β} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (-f) μ := by simpa [HasFiniteIntegral] using hfi
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.neg MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.neg
@[simp]
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_neg_iff {f : α → β} : HasFiniteIntegral (-f) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, HasFiniteIntegral.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_neg_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_neg_iff
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.norm {f : α → β} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ := by
have eq : (fun a => (nnnorm ‖f a‖ : ℝ≥0∞)) = fun a => (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
funext
rw [nnnorm_norm]
rwa [HasFiniteIntegral, eq]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.norm MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.norm
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff (f : α → β) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hasFiniteIntegral_congr' <| eventually_of_forall fun x => norm_norm (f x)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_norm_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => (f x).toReal) μ := by
have :
∀ x, (‖(f x).toReal‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨(f x).toReal, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg⟩ := by
intro x
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg]
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, this]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono fun x => ?_) (lt_top_iff_ne_top.2 hf)
by_cases hfx : f x = ∞
· simp [hfx]
· lift f x to ℝ≥0 using hfx with fx h
simp [← h, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem isFiniteMeasure_withDensity_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
IsFiniteMeasure (μ.withDensity fun x => ENNReal.ofReal <| f x) := by
refine isFiniteMeasure_withDensity ((lintegral_mono fun x => ?_).trans_lt hfi).ne
exact Real.ofReal_le_ennnorm (f x)
#align measure_theory.is_finite_measure_with_density_of_real MeasureTheory.isFiniteMeasure_withDensity_ofReal
section DominatedConvergence
variable {F : ℕ → α → β} {f : α → β} {bound : α → ℝ}
theorem all_ae_ofReal_F_le_bound (h : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a) :
∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a‖ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (bound a) := fun n =>
(h n).mono fun _ h => ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.all_ae_of_real_F_le_bound MeasureTheory.all_ae_ofReal_F_le_bound
theorem all_ae_tendsto_ofReal_norm (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop <| 𝓝 <| f a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a‖) atTop <| 𝓝 <| ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ :=
h.mono fun _ h => tendsto_ofReal <| Tendsto.comp (Continuous.tendsto continuous_norm _) h
#align measure_theory.all_ae_tendsto_of_real_norm MeasureTheory.all_ae_tendsto_ofReal_norm
theorem all_ae_ofReal_f_le_bound (h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (bound a) := by
have F_le_bound := all_ae_ofReal_F_le_bound h_bound
rw [← ae_all_iff] at F_le_bound
apply F_le_bound.mp ((all_ae_tendsto_ofReal_norm h_lim).mono _)
intro a tendsto_norm F_le_bound
exact le_of_tendsto' tendsto_norm F_le_bound
#align measure_theory.all_ae_of_real_f_le_bound MeasureTheory.all_ae_ofReal_f_le_bound
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → β} {f : α → β} {bound : α → ℝ}
(bound_hasFiniteIntegral : HasFiniteIntegral bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ := by
/- `‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a` and `‖F n a‖ --> ‖f a‖` implies `‖f a‖ ≤ bound a`,
and so `∫ ‖f‖ ≤ ∫ bound < ∞` since `bound` is has_finite_integral -/
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
calc
(∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (bound a) ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae <| all_ae_ofReal_f_le_bound h_bound h_lim
_ < ∞ := by
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal]
· exact bound_hasFiniteIntegral
exact (h_bound 0).mono fun a h => le_trans (norm_nonneg _) h
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_of_dominated_convergence
theorem tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence {F : ℕ → α → β} {f : α → β} {bound : α → ℝ}
(F_measurable : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (F n) μ)
(bound_hasFiniteIntegral : HasFiniteIntegral bound μ)
(h_bound : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => F n a) atTop (𝓝 (f a))) :
Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a - f a‖ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have f_measurable : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
aestronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto_ae _ F_measurable h_lim
let b a := 2 * ENNReal.ofReal (bound a)
/- `‖F n a‖ ≤ bound a` and `F n a --> f a` implies `‖f a‖ ≤ bound a`, and thus by the
triangle inequality, have `‖F n a - f a‖ ≤ 2 * (bound a)`. -/
have hb : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a - f a‖ ≤ b a := by
intro n
filter_upwards [all_ae_ofReal_F_le_bound h_bound n,
all_ae_ofReal_f_le_bound h_bound h_lim] with a h₁ h₂
calc
ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a - f a‖ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a‖ + ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add]
· apply ofReal_le_ofReal
apply norm_sub_le
· exact norm_nonneg _
· exact norm_nonneg _
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (bound a) + ENNReal.ofReal (bound a) := add_le_add h₁ h₂
_ = b a := by rw [← two_mul]
-- On the other hand, `F n a --> f a` implies that `‖F n a - f a‖ --> 0`
have h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a - f a‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
refine h_lim.mono fun a h => (continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
rwa [← tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
/- Therefore, by the dominated convergence theorem for nonnegative integration, have
` ∫ ‖f a - F n a‖ --> 0 ` -/
suffices Tendsto (fun n => ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖F n a - f a‖ ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ _ : α, 0 ∂μ)) by
rwa [lintegral_zero] at this
-- Using the dominated convergence theorem.
refine tendsto_lintegral_of_dominated_convergence' _ ?_ hb ?_ ?_
-- Show `fun a => ‖f a - F n a‖` is almost everywhere measurable for all `n`
· exact fun n =>
measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable ((F_measurable n).sub f_measurable).norm.aemeasurable
-- Show `2 * bound` `HasFiniteIntegral`
· rw [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal] at bound_hasFiniteIntegral
· calc
∫⁻ a, b a ∂μ = 2 * ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (bound a) ∂μ := by
rw [lintegral_const_mul']
exact coe_ne_top
_ ≠ ∞ := mul_ne_top coe_ne_top bound_hasFiniteIntegral.ne
filter_upwards [h_bound 0] with _ h using le_trans (norm_nonneg _) h
-- Show `‖f a - F n a‖ --> 0`
· exact h
#align measure_theory.tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence MeasureTheory.tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence
end DominatedConvergence
section PosPart
/-! Lemmas used for defining the positive part of an `L¹` function -/
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.max_zero {f : α → ℝ} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => max (f a) 0) μ :=
hf.mono <| eventually_of_forall fun x => by simp [abs_le, le_abs_self]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.max_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.max_zero
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.min_zero {f : α → ℝ} (hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun a => min (f a) 0) μ :=
hf.mono <| eventually_of_forall fun x => by simpa [abs_le] using neg_abs_le _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.min_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.min_zero
end PosPart
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*}
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.smul [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β] (c : 𝕜)
{f : α → β} : HasFiniteIntegral f μ → HasFiniteIntegral (c • f) μ := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral]; intro hfi
calc
(∫⁻ a : α, ‖c • f a‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a : α, ‖c‖₊ * ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_mono ?_
intro i
-- After leanprover/lean4#2734, we need to do beta reduction `exact mod_cast`
beta_reduce
exact mod_cast (nnnorm_smul_le c (f i))
_ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_const_mul']
exacts [mul_lt_top coe_ne_top hfi.ne, coe_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.smul MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.smul
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_smul_iff [NormedRing 𝕜] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β] {c : 𝕜}
(hc : IsUnit c) (f : α → β) : HasFiniteIntegral (c • f) μ ↔ HasFiniteIntegral f μ := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hc
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [smul_smul, Units.inv_mul, one_smul] using h.smul ((c⁻¹ : 𝕜ˣ) : 𝕜)
exact HasFiniteIntegral.smul _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral_smul_iff MeasureTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_smul_iff
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.const_mul [NormedRing 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => c * f x) μ :=
h.smul c
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.const_mul MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.const_mul
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.mul_const [NormedRing 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜} (h : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => f x * c) μ :=
h.smul (MulOpposite.op c)
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.mul_const MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.mul_const
end NormedSpace
/-! ### The predicate `Integrable` -/
-- variable [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [MeasurableSpace δ]
/-- `Integrable f μ` means that `f` is measurable and that the integral `∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ` is finite.
`Integrable f` means `Integrable f volume`. -/
def Integrable {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ ∧ HasFiniteIntegral f μ
#align measure_theory.integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable
theorem memℒp_one_iff_integrable {f : α → β} : Memℒp f 1 μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [Integrable, HasFiniteIntegral, Memℒp, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_one_iff_integrable MeasureTheory.memℒp_one_iff_integrable
theorem Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem Integrable.aemeasurable [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.integrable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.aemeasurable
theorem Integrable.hasFiniteIntegral {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : HasFiniteIntegral f μ :=
hf.2
#align measure_theory.integrable.has_finite_integral MeasureTheory.Integrable.hasFiniteIntegral
theorem Integrable.mono {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ ‖g a‖) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.hasFiniteIntegral.mono h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono
theorem Integrable.mono' {f : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨hf, hg.hasFiniteIntegral.mono' h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono' MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono'
theorem Integrable.congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : Integrable g μ :=
⟨hg, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.congr' h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.congr' MeasureTheory.Integrable.congr'
theorem integrable_congr' {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) :
Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h2f => h2f.congr' hg h, fun h2g => h2g.congr' hf <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_congr' MeasureTheory.integrable_congr'
theorem Integrable.congr {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Integrable g μ :=
⟨hf.1.congr h, hf.2.congr h⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.congr MeasureTheory.Integrable.congr
theorem integrable_congr {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Integrable f μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.congr h, fun hg => hg.congr h.symm⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_congr MeasureTheory.integrable_congr
theorem integrable_const_iff {c : β} : Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ univ < ∞ := by
have : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun _ : α => c) μ := aestronglyMeasurable_const
rw [Integrable, and_iff_right this, hasFiniteIntegral_const_iff]
#align measure_theory.integrable_const_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem integrable_const [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : β) : Integrable (fun _ : α => c) μ :=
integrable_const_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| measure_lt_top _ _
#align measure_theory.integrable_const MeasureTheory.integrable_const
@[simp]
theorem Integrable.of_finite [Finite α] [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
(μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → β) : Integrable (fun a ↦ f a) μ :=
⟨(StronglyMeasurable.of_finite f).aestronglyMeasurable, .of_finite⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")] alias integrable_of_fintype := Integrable.of_finite
theorem Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow
theorem Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Integrable (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) μ := by
by_cases h_zero : p = 0
· simp [h_zero, integrable_const]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, integrable_const]
exact hf.integrable_norm_rpow h_zero h_top
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable_norm_rpow' MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable_norm_rpow'
theorem Integrable.mono_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : Integrable f μ :=
⟨h.aestronglyMeasurable.mono_measure hμ, h.hasFiniteIntegral.mono_measure hμ⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.mono_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.mono_measure
theorem Integrable.of_measure_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ)
{f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable f μ' := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.of_measure_le_smul c hc hμ'_le
#align measure_theory.integrable.of_measure_le_smul MeasureTheory.Integrable.of_measure_le_smul
theorem Integrable.add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : Integrable f μ) (hν : Integrable f ν) :
Integrable f (μ + ν) := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hμ hν ⊢
refine ⟨hμ.aestronglyMeasurable.add_measure hν.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [snorm_one_add_measure, ENNReal.add_lt_top]
exact ⟨hμ.snorm_lt_top, hν.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.add_measure
theorem Integrable.left_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f (μ + ν)) : Integrable f μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.left_of_add_measure
#align measure_theory.integrable.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.left_of_add_measure
theorem Integrable.right_of_add_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
Integrable f ν := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.right_of_add_measure
#align measure_theory.integrable.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.right_of_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integrable_add_measure {f : α → β} :
Integrable f (μ + ν) ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable f ν :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_add_measure, h.right_of_add_measure⟩, fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_add_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_add_measure
@[simp]
theorem integrable_zero_measure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → β} :
Integrable f (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero_measure f, hasFiniteIntegral_zero_measure f⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_zero_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_zero_measure
theorem integrable_finset_sum_measure {ι} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → β} {μ : ι → Measure α}
{s : Finset ι} : Integrable f (∑ i ∈ s, μ i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable f (μ i) := by
induction s using Finset.induction_on <;> simp [*]
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum_measure
theorem Integrable.smul_measure {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c • μ) := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at h ⊢
exact h.smul_measure hc
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_measure MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_measure
theorem Integrable.smul_measure_nnreal {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ≥0} :
Integrable f (c • μ) := by
apply h.smul_measure
simp
theorem integrable_smul_measure {f : α → β} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c • μ) ↔ Integrable f μ :=
⟨fun h => by
simpa only [smul_smul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel h₁ h₂, one_smul] using
h.smul_measure (ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 h₁),
fun h => h.smul_measure h₂⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_smul_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_smul_measure
theorem integrable_inv_smul_measure {f : α → β} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : c ≠ 0) (h₂ : c ≠ ∞) :
Integrable f (c⁻¹ • μ) ↔ Integrable f μ :=
integrable_smul_measure (by simpa using h₂) (by simpa using h₁)
#align measure_theory.integrable_inv_smul_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_inv_smul_measure
theorem Integrable.to_average {f : α → β} (h : Integrable f μ) : Integrable f ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [smul_zero]
· apply h.smul_measure
simpa
#align measure_theory.integrable.to_average MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average
theorem integrable_average [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} :
Integrable f ((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ) ↔ Integrable f μ :=
(eq_or_ne μ 0).by_cases (fun h => by simp [h]) fun h =>
integrable_smul_measure (ENNReal.inv_ne_zero.2 <| measure_ne_top _ _)
(ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 <| mt Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero.1 h)
#align measure_theory.integrable_average MeasureTheory.integrable_average
theorem integrable_map_measure {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ)) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Integrable g (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Integrable (g ∘ f) μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact memℒp_map_measure_iff hg hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_map_measure MeasureTheory.integrable_map_measure
theorem Integrable.comp_aemeasurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : Integrable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
(integrable_map_measure hg.aestronglyMeasurable hf).mp hg
#align measure_theory.integrable.comp_ae_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.comp_aemeasurable
theorem Integrable.comp_measurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : Integrable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : Measurable f) : Integrable (g ∘ f) μ :=
hg.comp_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.integrable.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.Integrable.comp_measurable
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrable_map_iff {f : α → δ} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f)
{g : δ → β} : Integrable g (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Integrable (g ∘ f) μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact hf.memℒp_map_measure_iff
#align measurable_embedding.integrable_map_iff MeasurableEmbedding.integrable_map_iff
theorem integrable_map_equiv (f : α ≃ᵐ δ) (g : δ → β) :
Integrable g (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Integrable (g ∘ f) μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact f.memℒp_map_measure_iff
#align measure_theory.integrable_map_equiv MeasureTheory.integrable_map_equiv
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp {ν : Measure δ} {g : δ → β} {f : α → δ}
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν) :
Integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ Integrable g ν := by
rw [← hf.map_eq] at hg ⊢
exact (integrable_map_measure hg hf.measurable.aemeasurable).symm
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.integrable_comp MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb {f : α → δ} {ν} (h₁ : MeasurePreserving f μ ν)
(h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding f) {g : δ → β} : Integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ Integrable g ν :=
h₁.map_eq ▸ Iff.symm h₂.integrable_map_iff
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving.integrable_comp_emb MeasureTheory.MeasurePreserving.integrable_comp_emb
theorem lintegral_edist_lt_top {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, edist (f a) (g a) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_edist_triangle hf.aestronglyMeasurable aestronglyMeasurable_zero)
(ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 <| by
simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_edist]
exact ⟨hf.hasFiniteIntegral, hg.hasFiniteIntegral⟩)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_edist_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_edist_lt_top
variable (α β μ)
@[simp]
theorem integrable_zero : Integrable (fun _ => (0 : β)) μ := by
simp [Integrable, aestronglyMeasurable_const]
#align measure_theory.integrable_zero MeasureTheory.integrable_zero
variable {α β μ}
theorem Integrable.add' {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
HasFiniteIntegral (f + g) μ :=
calc
(∫⁻ a, ‖f a + g a‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ + ‖g a‖₊ ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => by
-- After leanprover/lean4#2734, we need to do beta reduction before `exact mod_cast`
beta_reduce
exact mod_cast nnnorm_add_le _ _
_ = _ := lintegral_nnnorm_add_left hf.aestronglyMeasurable _
_ < ∞ := add_lt_top.2 ⟨hf.hasFiniteIntegral, hg.hasFiniteIntegral⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add' MeasureTheory.Integrable.add'
theorem Integrable.add {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (f + g) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.add hg.aestronglyMeasurable, hf.add' hg⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.add MeasureTheory.Integrable.add
theorem integrable_finset_sum' {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) : Integrable (∑ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Finset.sum_induction f (fun g => Integrable g μ) (fun _ _ => Integrable.add)
(integrable_zero _ _ _) hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum' MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum'
theorem integrable_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) : Integrable (fun a => ∑ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by
simpa only [← Finset.sum_apply] using integrable_finset_sum' s hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integrable_finset_sum
theorem Integrable.neg {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (-f) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.neg, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.neg MeasureTheory.Integrable.neg
@[simp]
theorem integrable_neg_iff {f : α → β} : Integrable (-f) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, Integrable.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_neg_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_neg_iff
@[simp]
lemma integrable_add_iff_integrable_right {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f + g + (-f) by simp only [add_neg_cancel_comm] ▸ h.add hf.neg,
fun h ↦ hf.add h⟩
@[simp]
lemma integrable_add_iff_integrable_left {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (g + f) μ ↔ Integrable g μ := by
rw [add_comm, integrable_add_iff_integrable_right hf]
lemma integrable_left_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ}
(h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(h_int : Integrable (f + g) μ) : Integrable f μ := by
refine h_int.mono' h_meas ?_
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with a haf hag
exact (Real.norm_of_nonneg haf).symm ▸ (le_add_iff_nonneg_right _).mpr hag
lemma integrable_right_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ}
(h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g)
(h_int : Integrable (f + g) μ) : Integrable g μ :=
integrable_left_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg
((AEStronglyMeasurable.add_iff_right h_meas).mp h_int.aestronglyMeasurable)
hg hf (add_comm f g ▸ h_int)
lemma integrable_add_iff_of_nonneg {f g : α → ℝ} (h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hg : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨integrable_left_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg h_meas hf hg h,
integrable_right_of_integrable_add_of_nonneg h_meas hf hg h⟩, fun ⟨hf, hg⟩ ↦ hf.add hg⟩
lemma integrable_add_iff_of_nonpos {f g : α → ℝ} (h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) (hg : g ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ := by
rw [← integrable_neg_iff, ← integrable_neg_iff (f := f), ← integrable_neg_iff (f := g), neg_add]
exact integrable_add_iff_of_nonneg h_meas.neg (hf.mono (fun _ ↦ neg_nonneg_of_nonpos))
(hg.mono (fun _ ↦ neg_nonneg_of_nonpos))
@[simp]
lemma integrable_add_const_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {c : β} :
Integrable (fun x ↦ f x + c) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
integrable_add_iff_integrable_left (integrable_const _)
@[simp]
lemma integrable_const_add_iff [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → β} {c : β} :
Integrable (fun x ↦ c + f x) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
integrable_add_iff_integrable_right (integrable_const _)
theorem Integrable.sub {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (f - g) μ := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.integrable.sub MeasureTheory.Integrable.sub
theorem Integrable.norm {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.norm, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.norm⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.norm MeasureTheory.Integrable.norm
theorem Integrable.inf {β} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⊓ g) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact hf.inf hg
#align measure_theory.integrable.inf MeasureTheory.Integrable.inf
theorem Integrable.sup {β} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⊔ g) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact hf.sup hg
#align measure_theory.integrable.sup MeasureTheory.Integrable.sup
theorem Integrable.abs {β} [NormedLatticeAddCommGroup β] {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun a => |f a|) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.abs
#align measure_theory.integrable.abs MeasureTheory.Integrable.abs
theorem Integrable.bdd_mul {F : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing F] {f g : α → F} (hint : Integrable g μ)
(hm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hfbdd : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
Integrable (fun x => f x * g x) μ := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· rw [μ.eq_zero_of_isEmpty]
exact integrable_zero_measure
· refine ⟨hm.mul hint.1, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := hfbdd
have hCnonneg : 0 ≤ C := le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (hC hα.some)
have : (fun x => ‖f x * g x‖₊) ≤ fun x => ⟨C, hCnonneg⟩ * ‖g x‖₊ := by
intro x
simp only [nnnorm_mul]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hC x) (zero_le _)
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (lintegral_mono_nnreal this) ?_
simp only [ENNReal.coe_mul]
rw [lintegral_const_mul' _ _ ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (ne_of_lt hint.2)
#align measure_theory.integrable.bdd_mul MeasureTheory.Integrable.bdd_mul
/-- **Hölder's inequality for integrable functions**: the scalar multiplication of an integrable
vector-valued function by a scalar function with finite essential supremum is integrable. -/
theorem Integrable.essSup_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Integrable f μ) {g : α → 𝕜} (g_aestronglyMeasurable : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(ess_sup_g : essSup (fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ ≠ ∞) :
Integrable (fun x : α => g x • f x) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at *
refine ⟨g_aestronglyMeasurable.smul hf.1, ?_⟩
have h : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) / 1 = 1 / ∞ + 1 / 1 := by norm_num
have hg' : snorm g ∞ μ ≠ ∞ := by rwa [snorm_exponent_top]
calc
snorm (fun x : α => g x • f x) 1 μ ≤ _ := by
simpa using MeasureTheory.snorm_smul_le_mul_snorm hf.1 g_aestronglyMeasurable h
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.mul_lt_top hg' hf.2.ne
#align measure_theory.integrable.ess_sup_smul MeasureTheory.Integrable.essSup_smul
/-- Hölder's inequality for integrable functions: the scalar multiplication of an integrable
scalar-valued function by a vector-value function with finite essential supremum is integrable. -/
theorem Integrable.smul_essSup {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β]
{f : α → 𝕜} (hf : Integrable f μ) {g : α → β}
(g_aestronglyMeasurable : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(ess_sup_g : essSup (fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ ≠ ∞) :
Integrable (fun x : α => f x • g x) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at *
refine ⟨hf.1.smul g_aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have h : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) / 1 = 1 / 1 + 1 / ∞ := by norm_num
have hg' : snorm g ∞ μ ≠ ∞ := by rwa [snorm_exponent_top]
calc
snorm (fun x : α => f x • g x) 1 μ ≤ _ := by
simpa using MeasureTheory.snorm_smul_le_mul_snorm g_aestronglyMeasurable hf.1 h
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.mul_lt_top hf.2.ne hg'
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_ess_sup MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_essSup
theorem integrable_norm_iff {f : α → β} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Integrable (fun a => ‖f a‖) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [Integrable, and_iff_right hf, and_iff_right hf.norm, hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
#align measure_theory.integrable_norm_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_norm_iff
theorem integrable_of_norm_sub_le {f₀ f₁ : α → β} {g : α → ℝ} (hf₁_m : AEStronglyMeasurable f₁ μ)
(hf₀_i : Integrable f₀ μ) (hg_i : Integrable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f₀ a - f₁ a‖ ≤ g a) :
Integrable f₁ μ :=
haveI : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f₁ a‖ ≤ ‖f₀ a‖ + g a := by
apply h.mono
intro a ha
calc
‖f₁ a‖ ≤ ‖f₀ a‖ + ‖f₀ a - f₁ a‖ := norm_le_insert _ _
_ ≤ ‖f₀ a‖ + g a := add_le_add_left ha _
Integrable.mono' (hf₀_i.norm.add hg_i) hf₁_m this
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_norm_sub_le MeasureTheory.integrable_of_norm_sub_le
theorem Integrable.prod_mk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (fun x => (f x, g x)) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.prod_mk hg.aestronglyMeasurable,
(hf.norm.add' hg.norm).mono <|
eventually_of_forall fun x =>
calc
max ‖f x‖ ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ + ‖g x‖ := max_le_add_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)
_ ≤ ‖‖f x‖ + ‖g x‖‖ := le_abs_self _⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.prod_mk MeasureTheory.Integrable.prod_mk
theorem Memℒp.integrable {q : ℝ≥0∞} (hq1 : 1 ≤ q) {f : α → β} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(hfq : Memℒp f q μ) : Integrable f μ :=
memℒp_one_iff_integrable.mp (hfq.memℒp_of_exponent_le hq1)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.integrable MeasureTheory.Memℒp.integrable
/-- A non-quantitative version of Markov inequality for integrable functions: the measure of points
where `‖f x‖ ≥ ε` is finite for all positive `ε`. -/
theorem Integrable.measure_norm_ge_lt_top {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
μ { x | ε ≤ ‖f x‖ } < ∞ := by
rw [show { x | ε ≤ ‖f x‖ } = { x | ENNReal.ofReal ε ≤ ‖f x‖₊ } by
simp only [ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe, ENNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm]]
refine (meas_ge_le_mul_pow_snorm μ one_ne_zero ENNReal.one_ne_top hf.1 ?_).trans_lt ?_
· simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hε
apply ENNReal.mul_lt_top
· simpa only [ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one, Ne, ENNReal.inv_eq_top,
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le] using hε
simpa only [ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one] using
(memℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 hf).snorm_ne_top
#align measure_theory.integrable.measure_ge_lt_top MeasureTheory.Integrable.measure_norm_ge_lt_top
/-- A non-quantitative version of Markov inequality for integrable functions: the measure of points
where `‖f x‖ > ε` is finite for all positive `ε`. -/
lemma Integrable.measure_norm_gt_lt_top {f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
μ {x | ε < ‖f x‖} < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (fun _ h ↦ (Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ h).le)) (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top hε)
/-- If `f` is `ℝ`-valued and integrable, then for any `c > 0` the set `{x | f x ≥ c}` has finite
measure. -/
lemma Integrable.measure_ge_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) :
μ {a : α | ε ≤ f a} < ∞ := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono ?_) (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top ε_pos)
intro x hx
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
exact hx.trans (le_abs_self _)
/-- If `f` is `ℝ`-valued and integrable, then for any `c < 0` the set `{x | f x ≤ c}` has finite
measure. -/
lemma Integrable.measure_le_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ} (c_neg : c < 0) :
μ {a : α | f a ≤ c} < ∞ := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono ?_) (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top (show 0 < -c by linarith))
intro x hx
simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
exact (show -c ≤ - f x by linarith).trans (neg_le_abs _)
/-- If `f` is `ℝ`-valued and integrable, then for any `c > 0` the set `{x | f x > c}` has finite
measure. -/
lemma Integrable.measure_gt_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) :
μ {a : α | ε < f a} < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (fun _ hx ↦ (Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ hx).le))
(Integrable.measure_ge_lt_top hf ε_pos)
/-- If `f` is `ℝ`-valued and integrable, then for any `c < 0` the set `{x | f x < c}` has finite
measure. -/
lemma Integrable.measure_lt_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) {c : ℝ} (c_neg : c < 0) :
μ {a : α | f a < c} < ∞ :=
lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono (fun _ hx ↦ (Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ hx).le))
(Integrable.measure_le_lt_top hf c_neg)
theorem LipschitzWith.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {K K'} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
(hg : LipschitzWith K g) (hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
Integrable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable, hg.memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz hg' g0]
#align measure_theory.lipschitz_with.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz MeasureTheory.LipschitzWith.integrable_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz
theorem Integrable.real_toNNReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun x => ((f x).toNNReal : ℝ)) μ := by
refine
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable.real_toNNReal.coe_nnreal_real.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ((hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm _).1 hf.hasFiniteIntegral)
apply lintegral_mono
intro x
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal, abs_le, le_abs_self]
#align measure_theory.integrable.real_to_nnreal MeasureTheory.Integrable.real_toNNReal
theorem ofReal_toReal_ae_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
(fun x => ENNReal.ofReal (f x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
filter_upwards [hf]
intro x hx
simp only [hx.ne, ofReal_toReal, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align measure_theory.of_real_to_real_ae_eq MeasureTheory.ofReal_toReal_ae_eq
theorem coe_toNNReal_ae_eq {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
(fun x => ((f x).toNNReal : ℝ≥0∞)) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
filter_upwards [hf]
intro x hx
simp only [hx.ne, Ne, not_false_iff, coe_toNNReal]
#align measure_theory.coe_to_nnreal_ae_eq MeasureTheory.coe_toNNReal_ae_eq
section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Measurable f)
{g : α → E} :
Integrable g (μ.withDensity fun x => f x) ↔ Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ := by
by_cases H : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x : α => (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ
· simp only [Integrable, aestronglyMeasurable_withDensity_iff hf, HasFiniteIntegral, H,
true_and_iff]
rw [lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul₀' hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal.aemeasurable]
· rw [iff_iff_eq]
congr
ext1 x
simp only [nnnorm_smul, NNReal.nnnorm_eq, coe_mul, Pi.mul_apply]
· rw [aemeasurable_withDensity_ennreal_iff hf]
convert H.ennnorm using 1
ext1 x
simp only [nnnorm_smul, NNReal.nnnorm_eq, coe_mul]
· simp only [Integrable, aestronglyMeasurable_withDensity_iff hf, H, false_and_iff]
#align measure_theory.integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul MeasureTheory.integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul
theorem integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : Measurable f) {g : α → E} :
Integrable g (μ.withDensity fun x => f x) ↔ Integrable (fun x => f x • g x) μ :=
integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul MeasureTheory.integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul
theorem integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f)
(hflt : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) {g : α → E} :
Integrable g (μ.withDensity f) ↔ Integrable (fun x => (f x).toReal • g x) μ := by
rw [← withDensity_congr_ae (coe_toNNReal_ae_eq hflt),
integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul]
· simp_rw [NNReal.smul_def, ENNReal.toReal]
· exact hf.ennreal_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul' MeasureTheory.integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul'
theorem integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{g : α → E} :
Integrable g (μ.withDensity fun x => f x) ↔ Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ :=
calc
Integrable g (μ.withDensity fun x => f x) ↔
Integrable g (μ.withDensity fun x => (hf.mk f x : ℝ≥0)) := by
suffices (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) =ᵐ[μ] (fun x => (hf.mk f x : ℝ≥0)) by
rw [withDensity_congr_ae this]
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simp [hx]
_ ↔ Integrable (fun x => ((hf.mk f x : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) • g x) μ :=
integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul hf.measurable_mk
_ ↔ Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ) • g x) μ := by
apply integrable_congr
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simp [hx]
#align measure_theory.integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_coe_smul₀ MeasureTheory.integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul₀
theorem integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul₀ {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
{g : α → E} : Integrable g (μ.withDensity fun x => f x) ↔ Integrable (fun x => f x • g x) μ :=
integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_coe_smul₀ hf
#align measure_theory.integrable_with_density_iff_integrable_smul₀ MeasureTheory.integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul₀
end
theorem integrable_withDensity_iff {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (hflt : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞)
{g : α → ℝ} : Integrable g (μ.withDensity f) ↔ Integrable (fun x => g x * (f x).toReal) μ := by
have : (fun x => g x * (f x).toReal) = fun x => (f x).toReal • g x := by simp [mul_comm]
rw [this]
exact integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul' hf hflt
#align measure_theory.integrable_with_density_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_withDensity_iff
section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
theorem memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity {f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : Measurable f)
(u : Lp E 1 (μ.withDensity fun x => f x)) : Memℒp (fun x => f x • u x) 1 μ :=
memℒp_one_iff_integrable.2 <|
(integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul f_meas).1 <| memℒp_one_iff_integrable.1 (Lp.memℒp u)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒ1_smul_of_L1_with_density MeasureTheory.memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity
variable (μ)
/-- The map `u ↦ f • u` is an isometry between the `L^1` spaces for `μ.withDensity f` and `μ`. -/
noncomputable def withDensitySMulLI {f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : Measurable f) :
Lp E 1 (μ.withDensity fun x => f x) →ₗᵢ[ℝ] Lp E 1 μ where
toFun u := (memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).toLp _
map_add' := by
intro u v
ext1
filter_upwards [(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).coeFn_toLp,
(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas v).coeFn_toLp,
(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas (u + v)).coeFn_toLp,
Lp.coeFn_add ((memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).toLp _)
((memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas v).toLp _),
(ae_withDensity_iff f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal).1 (Lp.coeFn_add u v)]
intro x hu hv huv h' h''
rw [huv, h', Pi.add_apply, hu, hv]
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (hx | hx)
· simp only [hx, zero_smul, add_zero]
· rw [h'' _, Pi.add_apply, smul_add]
simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero] using hx
map_smul' := by
intro r u
ext1
filter_upwards [(ae_withDensity_iff f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal).1 (Lp.coeFn_smul r u),
(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas (r • u)).coeFn_toLp,
Lp.coeFn_smul r ((memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).toLp _),
(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).coeFn_toLp]
intro x h h' h'' h'''
rw [RingHom.id_apply, h', h'', Pi.smul_apply, h''']
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with (hx | hx)
· simp only [hx, zero_smul, smul_zero]
· rw [h _, smul_comm, Pi.smul_apply]
simpa only [Ne, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero] using hx
norm_map' := by
intro u
-- Porting note: Lean can't infer types of `AddHom.coe_mk`.
simp only [snorm, LinearMap.coe_mk,
AddHom.coe_mk (M := Lp E 1 (μ.withDensity fun x => f x)) (N := Lp E 1 μ), Lp.norm_toLp,
one_ne_zero, ENNReal.one_ne_top, ENNReal.one_toReal, if_false, snorm', ENNReal.rpow_one,
_root_.div_one, Lp.norm_def]
rw [lintegral_withDensity_eq_lintegral_mul_non_measurable _ f_meas.coe_nnreal_ennreal
(Filter.eventually_of_forall fun x => ENNReal.coe_lt_top)]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).coeFn_toLp] with x hx
rw [hx, Pi.mul_apply]
change (‖(f x : ℝ) • u x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = (f x : ℝ≥0∞) * (‖u x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)
simp only [nnnorm_smul, NNReal.nnnorm_eq, ENNReal.coe_mul]
#align measure_theory.with_density_smul_li MeasureTheory.withDensitySMulLI
@[simp]
theorem withDensitySMulLI_apply {f : α → ℝ≥0} (f_meas : Measurable f)
(u : Lp E 1 (μ.withDensity fun x => f x)) :
withDensitySMulLI μ (E := E) f_meas u =
(memℒ1_smul_of_L1_withDensity f_meas u).toLp fun x => f x • u x :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.with_density_smul_li_apply MeasureTheory.withDensitySMulLI_apply
end
theorem mem_ℒ1_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hfi : (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) ≠ ∞) : Memℒp (fun x => (f x).toReal) 1 μ := by
rw [Memℒp, snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
exact
⟨(AEMeasurable.ennreal_toReal hfm).aestronglyMeasurable,
hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top hfi⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒ1_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.mem_ℒ1_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top
theorem integrable_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hfi : (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun x => (f x).toReal) μ :=
memℒp_one_iff_integrable.1 <| mem_ℒ1_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top hfm hfi
#align measure_theory.integrable_to_real_of_lintegral_ne_top MeasureTheory.integrable_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top
section PosPart
/-! ### Lemmas used for defining the positive part of an `L¹` function -/
theorem Integrable.pos_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun a => max (f a) 0) μ :=
⟨(hf.aestronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable.max aemeasurable_const).aestronglyMeasurable,
hf.hasFiniteIntegral.max_zero⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.pos_part MeasureTheory.Integrable.pos_part
theorem Integrable.neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun a => max (-f a) 0) μ :=
hf.neg.pos_part
#align measure_theory.integrable.neg_part MeasureTheory.Integrable.neg_part
end PosPart
section BoundedSMul
variable {𝕜 : Type*}
theorem Integrable.smul [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β] (c : 𝕜)
{f : α → β} (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (c • f) μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.const_smul c, hf.hasFiniteIntegral.smul c⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul
theorem _root_.IsUnit.integrable_smul_iff [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β] {c : 𝕜}
(hc : IsUnit c) (f : α → β) : Integrable (c • f) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
and_congr hc.aestronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff (hasFiniteIntegral_smul_iff hc f)
#align measure_theory.is_unit.integrable_smul_iff IsUnit.integrable_smul_iff
theorem integrable_smul_iff [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β] {c : 𝕜}
(hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → β) : Integrable (c • f) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).integrable_smul_iff f
#align measure_theory.integrable_smul_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_smul_iff
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 β] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 β]
theorem Integrable.smul_of_top_right {f : α → β} {φ : α → 𝕜} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hφ : Memℒp φ ∞ μ) : Integrable (φ • f) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact Memℒp.smul_of_top_right hf hφ
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_of_top_right MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_of_top_right
theorem Integrable.smul_of_top_left {f : α → β} {φ : α → 𝕜} (hφ : Integrable φ μ)
(hf : Memℒp f ∞ μ) : Integrable (φ • f) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hφ ⊢
exact Memℒp.smul_of_top_left hf hφ
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_of_top_left MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_of_top_left
theorem Integrable.smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} (hf : Integrable f μ) (c : β) :
Integrable (fun x => f x • c) μ :=
hf.smul_of_top_left (memℒp_top_const c)
#align measure_theory.integrable.smul_const MeasureTheory.Integrable.smul_const
end BoundedSMul
section NormedSpaceOverCompleteField
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [CompleteSpace 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
theorem integrable_smul_const {f : α → 𝕜} {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
Integrable (fun x => f x • c) μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [Integrable, aestronglyMeasurable_smul_const_iff (f := f) hc, and_congr_right_iff,
HasFiniteIntegral, nnnorm_smul, ENNReal.coe_mul]
intro _; rw [lintegral_mul_const' _ _ ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
have : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, x = 0 → x < ∞ := by simp
simp [hc, or_iff_left_of_imp (this _)]
#align measure_theory.integrable_smul_const MeasureTheory.integrable_smul_const
end NormedSpaceOverCompleteField
section NormedRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜}
theorem Integrable.const_mul {f : α → 𝕜} (h : Integrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
Integrable (fun x => c * f x) μ :=
h.smul c
#align measure_theory.integrable.const_mul MeasureTheory.Integrable.const_mul
theorem Integrable.const_mul' {f : α → 𝕜} (h : Integrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
Integrable ((fun _ : α => c) * f) μ :=
Integrable.const_mul h c
#align measure_theory.integrable.const_mul' MeasureTheory.Integrable.const_mul'
theorem Integrable.mul_const {f : α → 𝕜} (h : Integrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
Integrable (fun x => f x * c) μ :=
h.smul (MulOpposite.op c)
#align measure_theory.integrable.mul_const MeasureTheory.Integrable.mul_const
theorem Integrable.mul_const' {f : α → 𝕜} (h : Integrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
Integrable (f * fun _ : α => c) μ :=
Integrable.mul_const h c
#align measure_theory.integrable.mul_const' MeasureTheory.Integrable.mul_const'
theorem integrable_const_mul_iff {c : 𝕜} (hc : IsUnit c) (f : α → 𝕜) :
Integrable (fun x => c * f x) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
hc.integrable_smul_iff f
#align measure_theory.integrable_const_mul_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_const_mul_iff
theorem integrable_mul_const_iff {c : 𝕜} (hc : IsUnit c) (f : α → 𝕜) :
Integrable (fun x => f x * c) μ ↔ Integrable f μ :=
hc.op.integrable_smul_iff f
#align measure_theory.integrable_mul_const_iff MeasureTheory.integrable_mul_const_iff
theorem Integrable.bdd_mul' {f g : α → 𝕜} {c : ℝ} (hg : Integrable g μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Integrable (fun x => f x * g x) μ := by
refine Integrable.mono' (hg.norm.smul c) (hf.mul hg.1) ?_
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hx
rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul]
exact (norm_mul_le _ _).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hx (norm_nonneg _))
#align measure_theory.integrable.bdd_mul' MeasureTheory.Integrable.bdd_mul'
end NormedRing
section NormedDivisionRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜}
theorem Integrable.div_const {f : α → 𝕜} (h : Integrable f μ) (c : 𝕜) :
Integrable (fun x => f x / c) μ := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, h.mul_const]
#align measure_theory.integrable.div_const MeasureTheory.Integrable.div_const
end NormedDivisionRing
section RCLike
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜}
theorem Integrable.ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
Integrable (fun x => (f x : 𝕜)) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.ofReal
#align measure_theory.integrable.of_real MeasureTheory.Integrable.ofReal
theorem Integrable.re_im_iff :
Integrable (fun x => RCLike.re (f x)) μ ∧ Integrable (fun x => RCLike.im (f x)) μ ↔
Integrable f μ := by
simp_rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
exact memℒp_re_im_iff
#align measure_theory.integrable.re_im_iff MeasureTheory.Integrable.re_im_iff
theorem Integrable.re (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (fun x => RCLike.re (f x)) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.re
#align measure_theory.integrable.re MeasureTheory.Integrable.re
theorem Integrable.im (hf : Integrable f μ) : Integrable (fun x => RCLike.im (f x)) μ := by
rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable] at hf ⊢
exact hf.im
#align measure_theory.integrable.im MeasureTheory.Integrable.im
end RCLike
section Trim
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ' : Measure α} {f : α → H}
theorem Integrable.trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (hf_int : Integrable f μ') (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) :
Integrable f (μ'.trim hm) := by
refine ⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
rw [HasFiniteIntegral, lintegral_trim hm _]
· exact hf_int.2
· exact @StronglyMeasurable.ennnorm _ m _ _ f hf
#align measure_theory.integrable.trim MeasureTheory.Integrable.trim
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L1Space.lean | 1,264 | 1,270 | theorem integrable_of_integrable_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (hf_int : Integrable f (μ'.trim hm)) :
Integrable f μ' := by |
obtain ⟨hf_meas_ae, hf⟩ := hf_int
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_of_aestronglyMeasurable_trim hm hf_meas_ae, ?_⟩
rw [HasFiniteIntegral] at hf ⊢
rwa [lintegral_trim_ae hm _] at hf
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.ennnorm hf_meas_ae
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenji Nakagawa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenji Nakagawa, Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Pointwise
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Maximal
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ChainOfDivisors
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Operations
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2bbc7e3884ba234309d2a43b19144105a753292e"
/-!
# Dedekind domains and ideals
In this file, we show a ring is a Dedekind domain iff all fractional ideals are invertible.
Then we prove some results on the unique factorization monoid structure of the ideals.
## Main definitions
- `IsDedekindDomainInv` alternatively defines a Dedekind domain as an integral domain where
every nonzero fractional ideal is invertible.
- `isDedekindDomainInv_iff` shows that this does note depend on the choice of field of
fractions.
- `IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum` defines the type of nonzero prime ideals of `R`.
## Main results:
- `isDedekindDomain_iff_isDedekindDomainInv`
- `Ideal.uniqueFactorizationMonoid`
## Implementation notes
The definitions that involve a field of fractions choose a canonical field of fractions,
but are independent of that choice. The `..._iff` lemmas express this independence.
Often, definitions assume that Dedekind domains are not fields. We found it more practical
to add a `(h : ¬ IsField A)` assumption whenever this is explicitly needed.
## References
* [D. Marcus, *Number Fields*][marcus1977number]
* [J.W.S. Cassels, A. Frölich, *Algebraic Number Theory*][cassels1967algebraic]
* [J. Neukirch, *Algebraic Number Theory*][Neukirch1992]
## Tags
dedekind domain, dedekind ring
-/
variable (R A K : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing A] [Field K]
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
section Inverse
namespace FractionalIdeal
variable {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [IsDomain R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsFractionRing R₁ K]
variable {I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K}
noncomputable instance : Inv (FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) := ⟨fun I => 1 / I⟩
theorem inv_eq : I⁻¹ = 1 / I := rfl
#align fractional_ideal.inv_eq FractionalIdeal.inv_eq
theorem inv_zero' : (0 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 0 := div_zero
#align fractional_ideal.inv_zero' FractionalIdeal.inv_zero'
theorem inv_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
J⁻¹ = ⟨(1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / J, fractional_div_of_nonzero h⟩ := div_nonzero h
#align fractional_ideal.inv_nonzero FractionalIdeal.inv_nonzero
theorem coe_inv_of_nonzero {J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (h : J ≠ 0) :
(↑J⁻¹ : Submodule R₁ K) = IsLocalization.coeSubmodule K ⊤ / (J : Submodule R₁ K) := by
simp_rw [inv_nonzero _ h, coe_one, coe_mk, IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_inv_of_nonzero FractionalIdeal.coe_inv_of_nonzero
variable {K}
theorem mem_inv_iff (hI : I ≠ 0) {x : K} : x ∈ I⁻¹ ↔ ∀ y ∈ I, x * y ∈ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) :=
mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI
#align fractional_ideal.mem_inv_iff FractionalIdeal.mem_inv_iff
theorem inv_anti_mono (hI : I ≠ 0) (hJ : J ≠ 0) (hIJ : I ≤ J) : J⁻¹ ≤ I⁻¹ := by
-- Porting note: in Lean3, introducing `x` would just give `x ∈ J⁻¹ → x ∈ I⁻¹`, but
-- in Lean4, it goes all the way down to the subtypes
intro x
simp only [val_eq_coe, mem_coe, mem_inv_iff hJ, mem_inv_iff hI]
exact fun h y hy => h y (hIJ hy)
#align fractional_ideal.inv_anti_mono FractionalIdeal.inv_anti_mono
theorem le_self_mul_inv {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} (hI : I ≤ (1 : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)) :
I ≤ I * I⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_one_div hI
#align fractional_ideal.le_self_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.le_self_mul_inv
variable (K)
theorem coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv (I : Ideal R₁) :
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) ≤ I * (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ :=
le_self_mul_inv coeIdeal_le_one
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_le_self_mul_inv
/-- `I⁻¹` is the inverse of `I` if `I` has an inverse. -/
theorem right_inverse_eq (I J : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : I * J = 1) : J = I⁻¹ := by
have hI : I ≠ 0 := ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one I J h
suffices h' : I * (1 / I) = 1 from
congr_arg Units.inv <| @Units.ext _ _ (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h) (Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ h') rfl
apply le_antisymm
· apply mul_le.mpr _
intro x hx y hy
rw [mul_comm]
exact (mem_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mp hy x hx
rw [← h]
apply mul_left_mono I
apply (le_div_iff_of_nonzero hI).mpr _
intro y hy x hx
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_mem_mul hx hy
#align fractional_ideal.right_inverse_eq FractionalIdeal.right_inverse_eq
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ ∃ J, I * J = 1 :=
⟨fun h => ⟨I⁻¹, h⟩, fun ⟨J, hJ⟩ => by rwa [← right_inverse_eq K I J hJ]⟩
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_iff FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_iff
theorem mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit {I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K} : I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ IsUnit I :=
(mul_inv_cancel_iff K).trans isUnit_iff_exists_inv.symm
#align fractional_ideal.mul_inv_cancel_iff_is_unit FractionalIdeal.mul_inv_cancel_iff_isUnit
variable {K' : Type*} [Field K'] [Algebra R₁ K'] [IsFractionRing R₁ K']
@[simp]
theorem map_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) (h : K ≃ₐ[R₁] K') :
I⁻¹.map (h : K →ₐ[R₁] K') = (I.map h)⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq, map_div, map_one, inv_eq]
#align fractional_ideal.map_inv FractionalIdeal.map_inv
open Submodule Submodule.IsPrincipal
@[simp]
theorem spanSingleton_inv (x : K) : (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = spanSingleton _ x⁻¹ :=
one_div_spanSingleton x
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_inv FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_inv
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF form
theorem spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton (x y : K) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ y = spanSingleton R₁⁰ (x / y) := by
rw [div_spanSingleton, mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_div_span_singleton FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton
theorem spanSingleton_div_self {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x / spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_div_spanSingleton, div_self hx, spanSingleton_one]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_div_self FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_div_self
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) / Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_div_self K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_div_self
theorem spanSingleton_mul_inv {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
spanSingleton R₁⁰ x * (spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [spanSingleton_inv, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel hx, spanSingleton_one]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_mul_inv
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) *
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton,
spanSingleton_mul_inv K <|
(map_ne_zero_iff _ <| NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective R₁ K).mpr hx]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv
theorem spanSingleton_inv_mul {x : K} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(spanSingleton R₁⁰ x)⁻¹ * spanSingleton R₁⁰ x = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, spanSingleton_mul_inv K hx]
#align fractional_ideal.span_singleton_inv_mul FractionalIdeal.spanSingleton_inv_mul
theorem coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul {x : R₁} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)⁻¹ * Ideal.span ({x} : Set R₁) = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv K hx]
#align fractional_ideal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_inv_mul
theorem mul_generator_self_inv {R₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Algebra R₁ K] [IsLocalization R₁⁰ K]
(I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K) [Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) :
I * spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹ = 1 := by
-- Rewrite only the `I` that appears alone.
conv_lhs => congr; rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
rw [spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, mul_inv_cancel, spanSingleton_one]
intro generator_I_eq_zero
apply h
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, generator_I_eq_zero, spanSingleton_zero]
#align fractional_ideal.mul_generator_self_inv FractionalIdeal.mul_generator_self_inv
theorem invertible_of_principal (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] (h : I ≠ 0) : I * I⁻¹ = 1 :=
mul_div_self_cancel_iff.mpr
⟨spanSingleton _ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))⁻¹, mul_generator_self_inv _ I h⟩
#align fractional_ideal.invertible_of_principal FractionalIdeal.invertible_of_principal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Ideal.lean | 205 | 218 | theorem invertible_iff_generator_nonzero (I : FractionalIdeal R₁⁰ K)
[Submodule.IsPrincipal (I : Submodule R₁ K)] :
I * I⁻¹ = 1 ↔ generator (I : Submodule R₁ K) ≠ 0 := by |
constructor
· intro hI hg
apply ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one _ _ hI
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I, hg, spanSingleton_zero]
· intro hg
apply invertible_of_principal
rw [eq_spanSingleton_of_principal I]
intro hI
have := mem_spanSingleton_self R₁⁰ (generator (I : Submodule R₁ K))
rw [hI, mem_zero_iff] at this
contradiction
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
#align_import data.int.order.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fc2ed6f838ce7c9b7c7171e58d78eaf7b438fb0e"
/-!
# Further lemmas about the integers
The distinction between this file and `Data.Int.Order.Basic` is not particularly clear.
They are separated by now to minimize the porting requirements for tactics during the transition to
mathlib4. Now that `Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat` has been ported, please feel free to reorganize these
two files.
-/
open Function Nat
namespace Int
/-! ### nat abs -/
variable {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ}
theorem natAbs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs = b.natAbs ↔ a * a = b * b := by
rw [← abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq, abs_eq_natAbs, abs_eq_natAbs]
exact Int.natCast_inj.symm
#align int.nat_abs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq Int.natAbs_eq_iff_mul_self_eq
#align int.eq_nat_abs_iff_mul_eq_zero Int.eq_natAbs_iff_mul_eq_zero
theorem natAbs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs < b.natAbs ↔ a * a < b * b := by
rw [← abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt, abs_eq_natAbs, abs_eq_natAbs]
exact Int.ofNat_lt.symm
#align int.nat_abs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt Int.natAbs_lt_iff_mul_self_lt
theorem natAbs_le_iff_mul_self_le {a b : ℤ} : a.natAbs ≤ b.natAbs ↔ a * a ≤ b * b := by
rw [← abs_le_iff_mul_self_le, abs_eq_natAbs, abs_eq_natAbs]
exact Int.ofNat_le.symm
#align int.nat_abs_le_iff_mul_self_le Int.natAbs_le_iff_mul_self_le
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Order/Lemmas.lean | 45 | 50 | theorem dvd_div_of_mul_dvd {a b c : ℤ} (h : a * b ∣ c) : b ∣ c / a := by |
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp only [Int.ediv_zero, Int.dvd_zero]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
refine ⟨d, ?_⟩
rw [mul_assoc, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ ha]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## TODO
This file is huge; move material into separate files,
such as `Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Lemmas.lean`.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are nonnegative, via
`norm_nonneg'`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are nonnegative, via `norm_nonneg`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
#align norm_div_le norm_div_le
#align norm_sub_le norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
#align norm_div_le_of_le norm_div_le_of_le
#align norm_sub_le_of_le norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm' dist_le_norm_add_norm'
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm dist_le_norm_add_norm
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le' abs_norm_sub_norm_le'
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le abs_norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
#align norm_sub_norm_le' norm_sub_norm_le'
#align norm_sub_norm_le norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
#align dist_norm_norm_le' dist_norm_norm_le'
#align dist_norm_norm_le dist_norm_norm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' norm_le_norm_add_norm_div'
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div norm_le_norm_add_norm_div
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
#align norm_le_insert' norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
#align norm_le_insert norm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
#align norm_le_mul_norm_add norm_le_mul_norm_add
#align norm_le_add_norm_add norm_le_add_norm_add
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align ball_eq' ball_eq'
#align ball_eq ball_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
#align ball_one_eq ball_one_eq
#align ball_zero_eq ball_zero_eq
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm'' mem_ball_iff_norm''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm mem_ball_iff_norm
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm''' mem_ball_iff_norm'''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm' mem_ball_iff_norm'
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
#align mem_ball_one_iff mem_ball_one_iff
#align mem_ball_zero_iff mem_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'' mem_closedBall_iff_norm''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm mem_closedBall_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
#align mem_closed_ball_one_iff mem_closedBall_one_iff
#align mem_closed_ball_zero_iff mem_closedBall_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm''' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball' norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball norm_le_of_mem_closedBall
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball' norm_lt_of_mem_ball'
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball norm_lt_of_mem_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right'] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
#align norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div
#align norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub
@[to_additive isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le]
theorem isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le' : Bornology.IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [Set.subset_def, mem_closedBall_one_iff] using isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (1 : E)
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le', _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le, _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le
attribute [to_additive existing exists_norm_le] Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive exists_pos_norm_le]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R :=
let ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le'
⟨max R₀ 1, by positivity, fun x hx => (hR₀ x hx).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le
@[to_additive Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ < R :=
let ⟨R, hR₀, hR⟩ := hs.exists_pos_norm_le'
⟨R + 1, by positivity, fun x hx ↦ (hR x hx).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm' mem_sphere_iff_norm'
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm mem_sphere_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_one_iff_norm mem_sphere_one_iff_norm
#align mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' norm_eq_of_mem_sphere'
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere norm_eq_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
#align ne_one_of_mem_sphere ne_one_of_mem_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
#align ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
#align norm_group_seminorm normGroupSeminorm
#align norm_add_group_seminorm normAddGroupSeminorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_norm_group_seminorm coe_normGroupSeminorm
#align coe_norm_add_group_seminorm coe_normAddGroupSeminorm
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_zero NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {u : α → E} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → ‖u m / u n‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.cauchySeq_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
#align normed_add_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedAddCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
#align normed_add_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedAddCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
#align monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
#align monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
@[to_additive IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn]
theorem IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn' [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
{f : α → E} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
(isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.1 (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isBounded).imp fun _C hC _x hx =>
hC _ <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on' IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn'
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.exists_bound_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace α]
{f : α → E} (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) (h'f : Continuous f) : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa using (hf.isCompact_range h'f).isBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
#align seminormed_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm
#align seminormed_add_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ :=
rfl
#align coe_nnnorm' coe_nnnorm'
#align coe_nnnorm coe_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_comp_nnnorm' coe_comp_nnnorm'
#align coe_comp_nnnorm coe_comp_nnnorm
@[to_additive norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
#align norm_to_nnreal' norm_toNNReal'
#align norm_to_nnreal norm_toNNReal
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_div nndist_eq_nnnorm_div
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm nndist_eq_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 :=
NNReal.eq norm_one'
#align nnnorm_one' nnnorm_one'
#align nnnorm_zero nnnorm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
#align ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
#align nnnorm_mul_le' nnnorm_mul_le'
#align nnnorm_add_le nnnorm_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
#align nnnorm_inv' nnnorm_inv'
#align nnnorm_neg nnnorm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
#align nnnorm_div_le nnnorm_div_le
#align nnnorm_sub_le nnnorm_sub_le
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le'
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div'
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
#align nnnorm_le_insert' nnnorm_le_insert'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
#align nnnorm_le_insert nnnorm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
#align nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add
#align nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : ENNReal.ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖₊ :=
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' (x : E) : edist x 1 = (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div, div_one]
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' edist_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm edist_eq_coe_nnnorm
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball (1 : E) r ↔ ↑‖a‖₊ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align mem_emetric_ball_one_iff mem_emetric_ball_one_iff
#align mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : LipschitzWith C f :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe C ▸ MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖ ≤ K * ‖x‖ := by simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.dist_le_mul x 1
#align lipschitz_with.norm_le_mul' LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul'
#align lipschitz_with.norm_le_mul LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖x‖₊ :=
h.norm_le_mul' hf x
#align lipschitz_with.nnorm_le_mul' LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul'
#align lipschitz_with.nnorm_le_mul LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := by
simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_norm' AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm'
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_norm AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖f x‖₊ :=
h.le_mul_norm' hf x
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nnnorm' AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm'
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nnnorm AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz [OneHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
h.le_mul_nnnorm' (map_one f) x
#align one_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz
#align zero_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz ZeroHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.nnnorm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| hi.norm_map_of_map_one h₁ x
end NNNorm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero {f : α → E} {a : Filter α} {b : E} :
Tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto (fun e => ‖f e / b‖) a (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [← dist_eq_norm_div, ← tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero]
#align tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero
#align tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : α → E} {a : Filter α} :
Tendsto f a (𝓝 1) ↔ Tendsto (‖f ·‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero.trans <| by simp only [div_one]
#align tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
#align tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_norm_nhds_one : comap norm (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 (1 : E) := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using nhds_comap_dist (1 : E)
#align comap_norm_nhds_one comap_norm_nhds_one
#align comap_norm_nhds_zero comap_norm_nhds_zero
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1` (neutral element of `SeminormedGroup`).
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_one_norm'` and `squeeze_one_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `Topology.MetricSpace.Basic` and `Topology.Algebra.Order`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. In this pair of lemmas
(`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in
`Topology.MetricSpace.PseudoMetric` and `Topology.Algebra.Order`, the `'` version is phrased using
\"eventually\" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely."]
theorem squeeze_one_norm' {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n)
(h' : Tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall fun _n => norm_nonneg' _) h h'
#align squeeze_one_norm' squeeze_one_norm'
#align squeeze_zero_norm' squeeze_zero_norm'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `a` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`."]
theorem squeeze_one_norm {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (h : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n) :
Tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0) → Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
squeeze_one_norm' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align squeeze_one_norm squeeze_one_norm
#align squeeze_zero_norm squeeze_zero_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_norm_div_self (x : E) : Tendsto (fun a => ‖a / x‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using
tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _a => (x : E)) (𝓝 x) _)
#align tendsto_norm_div_self tendsto_norm_div_self
#align tendsto_norm_sub_self tendsto_norm_sub_self
@[to_additive tendsto_norm]
theorem tendsto_norm' {x : E} : Tendsto (fun a => ‖a‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ‖x‖) := by
simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _a => (1 : E)) _ _)
#align tendsto_norm' tendsto_norm'
#align tendsto_norm tendsto_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_norm_one : Tendsto (fun a : E => ‖a‖) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_norm_div_self (1 : E)
#align tendsto_norm_one tendsto_norm_one
#align tendsto_norm_zero tendsto_norm_zero
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_norm]
theorem continuous_norm' : Continuous fun a : E => ‖a‖ := by
simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : Continuous fun _a => (1 : E))
#align continuous_norm' continuous_norm'
#align continuous_norm continuous_norm
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_nnnorm]
theorem continuous_nnnorm' : Continuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
#align continuous_nnnorm' continuous_nnnorm'
#align continuous_nnnorm continuous_nnnorm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_norm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_norm' : LipschitzWith 1 (norm : E → ℝ) := by
simpa only [dist_one_left] using LipschitzWith.dist_right (1 : E)
#align lipschitz_with_one_norm' lipschitzWith_one_norm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_norm lipschitzWith_one_norm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm' : LipschitzWith 1 (NNNorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm' lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_norm]
theorem uniformContinuous_norm' : UniformContinuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'.uniformContinuous
#align uniform_continuous_norm' uniformContinuous_norm'
#align uniform_continuous_norm uniformContinuous_norm
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_nnnorm]
theorem uniformContinuous_nnnorm' : UniformContinuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
uniformContinuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
#align uniform_continuous_nnnorm' uniformContinuous_nnnorm'
#align uniform_continuous_nnnorm uniformContinuous_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_one_iff_norm {x : E} : x ∈ closure ({1} : Set E) ↔ ‖x‖ = 0 := by
rw [← closedBall_zero', mem_closedBall_one_iff, (norm_nonneg' x).le_iff_eq]
#align mem_closure_one_iff_norm mem_closure_one_iff_norm
#align mem_closure_zero_iff_norm mem_closure_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_one_eq : closure ({1} : Set E) = { x | ‖x‖ = 0 } :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_closure_one_iff_norm
#align closure_one_eq closure_one_eq
#align closure_zero_eq closure_zero_eq
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead of
multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead
of multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le' {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∃ A, ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : Tendsto (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) := by
cases' h_op with A h_op
rcases hg with ⟨C, hC⟩; rw [eventually_map] at hC
rw [NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one] at hf ⊢
intro ε ε₀
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε₀ (A * C) with ⟨δ, δ₀, hδ⟩
filter_upwards [hf δ δ₀, hC] with i hf hg
refine (h_op _ _).trans_lt ?_
rcases le_total A 0 with hA | hA
· exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hA <| norm_nonneg' _) <|
norm_nonneg' _).trans_lt ε₀
calc
A * ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ ≤ A * δ * C := by gcongr; exact hg
_ = A * C * δ := mul_right_comm _ _ _
_ < ε := hδ
#align filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le'
#align filter.tendsto.op_zero_is_bounded_under_le' Filter.Tendsto.op_zero_isBoundedUnder_le'
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that it
can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so
that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : Tendsto (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
hf.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le' hg op ⟨1, fun x y => (one_mul ‖x‖).symm ▸ h_op x y⟩
#align filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le
#align filter.tendsto.op_zero_is_bounded_under_le Filter.Tendsto.op_zero_isBoundedUnder_le
section
variable {l : Filter α} {f : α → E}
@[to_additive Filter.Tendsto.norm]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.norm' (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l (𝓝 ‖a‖) :=
tendsto_norm'.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.norm' Filter.Tendsto.norm'
#align filter.tendsto.norm Filter.Tendsto.norm
@[to_additive Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm' (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) l (𝓝 ‖a‖₊) :=
Tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm'.continuousAt h
#align filter.tendsto.nnnorm' Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm'
#align filter.tendsto.nnnorm Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → E}
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) Continuous.norm]
theorem Continuous.norm' : Continuous f → Continuous fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm'.comp
#align continuous.norm' Continuous.norm'
#align continuous.norm Continuous.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) Continuous.nnnorm]
theorem Continuous.nnnorm' : Continuous f → Continuous fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm'.comp
#align continuous.nnnorm' Continuous.nnnorm'
#align continuous.nnnorm Continuous.nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousAt.norm]
theorem ContinuousAt.norm' {a : α} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) a :=
Tendsto.norm' h
#align continuous_at.norm' ContinuousAt.norm'
#align continuous_at.norm ContinuousAt.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousAt.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousAt.nnnorm' {a : α} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) a :=
Tendsto.nnnorm' h
#align continuous_at.nnnorm' ContinuousAt.nnnorm'
#align continuous_at.nnnorm ContinuousAt.nnnorm
@[to_additive ContinuousWithinAt.norm]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.norm' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) s a :=
Tendsto.norm' h
#align continuous_within_at.norm' ContinuousWithinAt.norm'
#align continuous_within_at.norm ContinuousWithinAt.norm
@[to_additive ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) s a :=
Tendsto.nnnorm' h
#align continuous_within_at.nnnorm' ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm'
#align continuous_within_at.nnnorm ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousOn.norm]
theorem ContinuousOn.norm' {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).norm'
#align continuous_on.norm' ContinuousOn.norm'
#align continuous_on.norm ContinuousOn.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousOn.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousOn.nnnorm' {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) s := fun x hx => (h x hx).nnnorm'
#align continuous_on.nnnorm' ContinuousOn.nnnorm'
#align continuous_on.nnnorm ContinuousOn.nnnorm
end
/-- If `‖y‖ → ∞`, then we can assume `y ≠ x` for any fixed `x`. -/
@[to_additive eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop "If `‖y‖→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any
fixed `x`"]
theorem eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop' {l : Filter α} {f : α → E}
(h : Tendsto (fun y => ‖f y‖) l atTop) (x : E) : ∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
(h.eventually_ne_atTop _).mono fun _x => ne_of_apply_ne norm
#align eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top' eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop'
#align eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedCommGroup.mem_closure_iff :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ b ∈ s, ‖a / b‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align seminormed_comm_group.mem_closure_iff SeminormedCommGroup.mem_closure_iff
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.mem_closure_iff SeminormedAddCommGroup.mem_closure_iff
@[to_additive norm_le_zero_iff']
theorem norm_le_zero_iff''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
letI : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedGroup E› with toMetricSpace := MetricSpace.ofT0PseudoMetricSpace E }
rw [← dist_one_right, dist_le_zero]
#align norm_le_zero_iff''' norm_le_zero_iff'''
#align norm_le_zero_iff' norm_le_zero_iff'
@[to_additive norm_eq_zero']
theorem norm_eq_zero''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
(norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'''
#align norm_eq_zero''' norm_eq_zero'''
#align norm_eq_zero' norm_eq_zero'
@[to_additive norm_pos_iff']
theorem norm_pos_iff''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff''']
#align norm_pos_iff''' norm_pos_iff'''
#align norm_pos_iff' norm_pos_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedGroup.tendstoUniformlyOn_one {f : ι → κ → G} {s : Set κ} {l : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformlyOn f 1 l s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f i x‖ < ε := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-11.
Originally this was `simp_rw` instead of `simp only`,
but this creates a bad proof term with nested `OfNat.ofNat` that trips up `@[to_additive]`. -/
simp only [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, Pi.one_apply, dist_one_left]
#align seminormed_group.tendsto_uniformly_on_one SeminormedGroup.tendstoUniformlyOn_one
#align seminormed_add_group.tendsto_uniformly_on_zero SeminormedAddGroup.tendstoUniformlyOn_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_one {f : ι → κ → G}
{l : Filter ι} {l' : Filter κ} :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter f l l' ↔
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι × ι => fun z => f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ˢ l) l' := by
refine ⟨fun hf u hu => ?_, fun hf u hu => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu
refine
(hf { p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε } <| dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono fun x hx =>
H 1 (f x.fst.fst x.snd / f x.fst.snd x.snd) ?_
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx
· obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu
refine
(hf { p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε } <| dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono fun x hx =>
H (f x.fst.fst x.snd) (f x.fst.snd x.snd) ?_
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx
#align seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_one SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_one
#align seminormed_add_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_zero SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_one {f : ι → κ → G} {s : Set κ}
{l : Filter ι} :
UniformCauchySeqOn f l s ↔
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι × ι => fun z => f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ˢ l) s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter,
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter,
SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_one]
#align seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_one SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_one
#align seminormed_add_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_zero SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_zero
end SeminormedGroup
section Induced
variable (E F)
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a `SeminormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "A group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
def SeminormedGroup.induced [Group E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ PseudoMetricSpace.induced f toPseudoMetricSpace with
-- Porting note: needed to add the instance explicitly, and `‹PseudoMetricSpace F›` failed
norm := fun x => ‖f x‖
dist_eq := fun x y => by simp only [map_div, ← dist_eq_norm_div]; rfl }
#align seminormed_group.induced SeminormedGroup.induced
#align seminormed_add_group.induced SeminormedAddGroup.induced
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a
`SeminormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "A group homomorphism from an `AddCommGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.induced
[CommGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.induced SeminormedCommGroup.induced
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.induced SeminormedAddCommGroup.induced
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `NormedGroup` induces a `NormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "An injective group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`NormedAddGroup` induces a `NormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
def NormedGroup.induced
[Group E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (h : Injective f) :
NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with }
#align normed_group.induced NormedGroup.induced
#align normed_add_group.induced NormedAddGroup.induced
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `NormedGroup` induces a
`NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a
`NormedCommGroup` induces a `NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
def NormedCommGroup.induced [CommGroup E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : Injective f) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.induced NormedCommGroup.induced
#align normed_add_comm_group.induced NormedAddCommGroup.induced
end Induced
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_left : IsometricSMul E E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_left NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_left
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_left NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_left
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ← norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align dist_inv dist_inv
#align dist_neg dist_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
#align dist_self_mul_right dist_self_mul_right
#align dist_self_add_right dist_self_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
#align dist_self_mul_left dist_self_mul_left
#align dist_self_add_left dist_self_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- porting note (#10618): increase priority because `simp` can prove this
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,556 | 1,557 | theorem dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ := by |
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyFinite
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsCompact`: a set such that each open cover has a finite subcover. This is defined in mathlib
using filters. The main property of a compact set is `IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover`.
* `CompactSpace`: typeclass stating that the whole space is a compact set.
* `NoncompactSpace`: a space that is not a compact space.
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Classical Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
#align is_compact.compl_mem_sets IsCompact.compl_mem_sets
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
#align is_compact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
#align is_compact.induction_on IsCompact.induction_on
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
#align is_compact.inter_right IsCompact.inter_right
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
#align is_compact.inter_left IsCompact.inter_left
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
#align is_compact.diff IsCompact.diff
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
#align is_compact_of_is_closed_subset IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
#align is_compact.image_of_continuous_on IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
#align is_compact.image IsCompact.image
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
#align is_compact.adherence_nhdset IsCompact.adherence_nhdset
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
#align is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
#align is_compact.ultrafilter_le_nhds IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
#align is_compact.elim_directed_cover IsCompact.elim_directed_cover
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subcover IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover' IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover'
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
#align is_compact.disjoint_nhds_set_left IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
#align is_compact.disjoint_nhds_set_right IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
#align is_compact.elim_directed_family_closed IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun t ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed
/-- If `s` is a compact set in a topological space `X` and `f : ι → Set X` is a locally finite
family of sets, then `f i ∩ s` is nonempty only for a finitely many `i`. -/
theorem LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact {f : ι → Set X}
(hf : LocallyFinite f) (hs : IsCompact s) : { i | (f i ∩ s).Nonempty }.Finite := by
choose U hxU hUf using hf
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x _ => hxU x with ⟨t, -, hsU⟩
refine (t.finite_toSet.biUnion fun x _ => hUf x).subset ?_
rintro i ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hsU hx.2) with ⟨c, hct, hcx⟩
exact mem_biUnion hct ⟨x, hx.1, hcx⟩
#align locally_finite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
#align is_compact.inter_Inter_nonempty IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
#align is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed :=
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
#align is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_sequence_nonempty_compact_closed IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_compact_closed :=
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subcover_image IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_imageₓ
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
#align is_compact_of_finite_subcover isCompact_of_finite_subcover
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
#align is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
#align is_compact_iff_finite_subcover isCompact_iff_finite_subcover
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
#align is_compact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter Y) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ×ˢ l :=
le_antisymm (fun s hs ↦ hK.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall <| by simpa using hs)
(iSup₂_le fun x hx ↦ prod_mono (nhds_le_nhdsSet hx) le_rfl)
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 411 | 413 | theorem IsCompact.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ y ∈ K, l ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by |
simp only [prod_comm (f := l), hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, map_iSup]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8734e8953e4b439147bd6f75c2163f6d27cdce6"
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
* `eval₂ (f : R → S₁) (g : σ → S₁) p` : given a semiring homomorphism from `R` to another
semiring `S₁`, and a map `σ → S₁`, evaluates `p` at this valuation, returning a term of type `S₁`.
Note that `eval₂` can be made using `eval` and `map` (see below), and it has been suggested
that sticking to `eval` and `map` might make the code less brittle.
* `eval (g : σ → R) p` : given a map `σ → R`, evaluates `p` at this valuation,
returning a term of type `R`
* `map (f : R → S₁) p` : returns the multivariate polynomial obtained from `p` by the change of
coefficient semiring corresponding to `f`
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
#align mv_polynomial MvPolynomial
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
#align mv_polynomial.decidable_eq_mv_polynomial MvPolynomial.decidableEqMvPolynomial
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
#align mv_polynomial.is_scalar_tower_right MvPolynomial.isScalarTower_right
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
#align mv_polynomial.smul_comm_class_right MvPolynomial.smulCommClass_right
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
#align mv_polynomial.unique MvPolynomial.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
lsingle s
#align mv_polynomial.monomial MvPolynomial.monomial
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.single_eq_monomial MvPolynomial.single_eq_monomial
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
#align mv_polynomial.mul_def MvPolynomial.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
#align mv_polynomial.C MvPolynomial.C
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.algebra_map_eq MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
#align mv_polynomial.X MvPolynomial.X
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_left_injective MvPolynomial.monomial_left_injective
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_left_inj MvPolynomial.monomial_left_inj
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.C_apply MvPolynomial.C_apply
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
#align mv_polynomial.C_0 MvPolynomial.C_0
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.C_1 MvPolynomial.C_1
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
#align mv_polynomial.C_mul_monomial MvPolynomial.C_mul_monomial
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.C_add MvPolynomial.C_add
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
#align mv_polynomial.C_mul MvPolynomial.C_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.C_pow MvPolynomial.C_pow
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
#align mv_polynomial.C_injective MvPolynomial.C_injective
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.C_surjective MvPolynomial.C_surjective
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
#align mv_polynomial.C_inj MvPolynomial.C_inj
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
#align mv_polynomial.infinite_of_infinite MvPolynomial.infinite_of_infinite
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
#align mv_polynomial.infinite_of_nonempty MvPolynomial.infinite_of_nonempty
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, *]
#align mv_polynomial.C_eq_coe_nat MvPolynomial.C_eq_coe_nat
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
#align mv_polynomial.C_mul' MvPolynomial.C_mul'
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
#align mv_polynomial.smul_eq_C_mul MvPolynomial.smul_eq_C_mul
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
#align mv_polynomial.C_eq_smul_one MvPolynomial.C_eq_smul_one
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.smul_monomial MvPolynomial.smul_monomial
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
#align mv_polynomial.X_injective MvPolynomial.X_injective
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
#align mv_polynomial.X_inj MvPolynomial.X_inj
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_pow MvPolynomial.monomial_pow
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_mul MvPolynomial.monomial_mul
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_one_hom MvPolynomial.monomialOneHom
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_one_hom_apply MvPolynomial.monomialOneHom_apply
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
#align mv_polynomial.X_pow_eq_monomial MvPolynomial.X_pow_eq_monomial
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_add_single MvPolynomial.monomial_add_single
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_single_add MvPolynomial.monomial_single_add
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
#align mv_polynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial MvPolynomial.C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
#align mv_polynomial.C_mul_X_eq_monomial MvPolynomial.C_mul_X_eq_monomial
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove this
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_zero MvPolynomial.monomial_zero
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_zero' MvPolynomial.monomial_zero'
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_eq_zero MvPolynomial.monomial_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
#align mv_polynomial.sum_monomial_eq MvPolynomial.sum_monomial_eq
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
#align mv_polynomial.sum_C MvPolynomial.sum_C
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_sum_one MvPolynomial.monomial_sum_one
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_sum_index MvPolynomial.monomial_sum_index
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_finsupp_sum_index MvPolynomial.monomial_finsupp_sum_index
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_eq_monomial_iff MvPolynomial.monomial_eq_monomial_iff
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
#align mv_polynomial.monomial_eq MvPolynomial.monomial_eq
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
theorem induction_on_monomial {M : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (h_C : ∀ a, M (C a))
(h_X : ∀ p n, M p → M (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, M (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show M (monomial 0 a)
exact h_C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, M (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, h_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
#align mv_polynomial.induction_on_monomial MvPolynomial.induction_on_monomial
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(h1 : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(h2 : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (monomial 0 0) from h1 0 0)
fun a b f _ha _hb hPf => h2 _ _ (h1 _ _) hPf
#align mv_polynomial.induction_on' MvPolynomial.induction_on'
/-- Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required. -/
theorem induction_on''' {M : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (h_C : ∀ a, M (C a))
(h_add_weak :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → M f → M ((show (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R from monomial a b) + f)) :
M p :=
-- Porting note: I had to add the `show ... from ...` above, a type ascription was insufficient.
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| h_C 0) h_add_weak
#align mv_polynomial.induction_on''' MvPolynomial.induction_on'''
/-- Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required. -/
theorem induction_on'' {M : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (h_C : ∀ a, M (C a))
(h_add_weak :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → M f → M (monomial a b) →
M ((show (σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R from monomial a b) + f))
(h_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), M p → M (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) : M p :=
-- Porting note: I had to add the `show ... from ...` above, a type ascription was insufficient.
induction_on''' p h_C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
h_add_weak a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial h_C h_X a b
#align mv_polynomial.induction_on'' MvPolynomial.induction_on''
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`. -/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {M : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (h_C : ∀ a, M (C a))
(h_add : ∀ p q, M p → M q → M (p + q)) (h_X : ∀ p n, M p → M (p * X n)) : M p :=
induction_on'' p h_C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => h_add (monomial a b) f hm hf) h_X
#align mv_polynomial.induction_on MvPolynomial.induction_on
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note: this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note: `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
#align mv_polynomial.ring_hom_ext MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
#align mv_polynomial.ring_hom_ext' MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext'
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
#align mv_polynomial.hom_eq_hom MvPolynomial.hom_eq_hom
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
#align mv_polynomial.is_id MvPolynomial.is_id
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
#align mv_polynomial.alg_hom_ext' MvPolynomial.algHom_ext'
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
#align mv_polynomial.alg_hom_ext MvPolynomial.algHom_ext
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {τ : Type*} (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R) (r : R) :
f (C r) = C r :=
f.commutes r
#align mv_polynomial.alg_hom_C MvPolynomial.algHom_C
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| h_C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| h_add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| h_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
#align mv_polynomial.adjoin_range_X MvPolynomial.adjoin_range_X
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
#align mv_polynomial.linear_map_ext MvPolynomial.linearMap_ext
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
#align mv_polynomial.support MvPolynomial.support
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.finsupp_support_eq_support MvPolynomial.finsupp_support_eq_support
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
-- Porting note: the proof in Lean 3 wasn't fundamentally better and needed `by convert rfl`
-- the issue is the different decidability instances in the `ite` expressions
#align mv_polynomial.support_monomial MvPolynomial.support_monomial
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
#align mv_polynomial.support_monomial_subset MvPolynomial.support_monomial_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
#align mv_polynomial.support_add MvPolynomial.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
#align mv_polynomial.support_X MvPolynomial.support_X
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
#align mv_polynomial.support_X_pow MvPolynomial.support_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.support_zero MvPolynomial.support_zero
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
#align mv_polynomial.support_smul MvPolynomial.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
#align mv_polynomial.support_sum MvPolynomial.support_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
-- Porting note: I changed this from `@CoeFun.coe _ _ (MonoidAlgebra.coeFun _ _) p m` because
-- I think it should work better syntactically. They are defeq.
#align mv_polynomial.coeff MvPolynomial.coeff
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
#align mv_polynomial.mem_support_iff MvPolynomial.mem_support_iff
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
#align mv_polynomial.not_mem_support_iff MvPolynomial.not_mem_support_iff
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
#align mv_polynomial.sum_def MvPolynomial.sum_def
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
#align mv_polynomial.support_mul MvPolynomial.support_mul
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
#align mv_polynomial.ext MvPolynomial.ext
theorem ext_iff (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = q ↔ ∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q :=
⟨fun h m => by rw [h], ext p q⟩
#align mv_polynomial.ext_iff MvPolynomial.ext_iff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_add MvPolynomial.coeff_add
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_smul MvPolynomial.coeff_smul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_zero MvPolynomial.coeff_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_zero_X MvPolynomial.coeff_zero_X
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_add_monoid_hom MvPolynomial.coeffAddMonoidHom
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_sum MvPolynomial.coeff_sum
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
#align mv_polynomial.monic_monomial_eq MvPolynomial.monic_monomial_eq
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_monomial MvPolynomial.coeff_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_C MvPolynomial.coeff_C
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_one MvPolynomial.coeff_one
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_zero_C MvPolynomial.coeff_zero_C
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_zero_one MvPolynomial.coeff_zero_one
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_X_pow MvPolynomial.coeff_X_pow
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_X' MvPolynomial.coeff_X'
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_X MvPolynomial.coeff_X
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp (config := { contextual := true }) [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_C_mul MvPolynomial.coeff_C_mul
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mul MvPolynomial.coeff_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a => add_left_inj _
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mul_monomial MvPolynomial.coeff_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a => add_right_inj _
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_monomial_mul MvPolynomial.coeff_monomial_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mul_X MvPolynomial.coeff_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_X_mul MvPolynomial.coeff_X_mul
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
#align mv_polynomial.support_mul_X MvPolynomial.support_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
#align mv_polynomial.support_X_mul MvPolynomial.support_X_mul
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
#align mv_polynomial.support_smul_eq MvPolynomial.support_smul_eq
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
#align mv_polynomial.support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add MvPolynomial.support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
#align mv_polynomial.support_symm_diff_support_subset_support_add MvPolynomial.support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.add_singleton]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mul_monomial' MvPolynomial.coeff_mul_monomial'
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_monomial_mul' MvPolynomial.coeff_monomial_mul'
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_mul_X' MvPolynomial.coeff_mul_X'
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
#align mv_polynomial.coeff_X_mul' MvPolynomial.coeff_X_mul'
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
#align mv_polynomial.eq_zero_iff MvPolynomial.eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.ne_zero_iff MvPolynomial.ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
#align mv_polynomial.support_eq_empty MvPolynomial.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
#align mv_polynomial.exists_coeff_ne_zero MvPolynomial.exists_coeff_ne_zero
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
#align mv_polynomial.C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff MvPolynomial.C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
#align mv_polynomial.constant_coeff MvPolynomial.constantCoeff
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.constant_coeff_eq MvPolynomial.constantCoeff_eq
variable (σ)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
#align mv_polynomial.constant_coeff_C MvPolynomial.constantCoeff_C
variable {σ}
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
#align mv_polynomial.constant_coeff_X MvPolynomial.constantCoeff_X
variable {R}
/- porting note: increased priority because otherwise `simp` time outs when trying to simplify
the left-hand side. `simpNF` linter indicated this and it was verified. -/
@[simp 1001]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.constant_coeff_smul MvPolynomial.constantCoeff_smul
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 976 | 978 | theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by |
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.ChebyshevMarkov
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.CompareExp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.TriangleInequality
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Compact
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# Lp space
This file provides the space `Lp E p μ` as the subtype of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun)
such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. For `1 ≤ p`, `snorm` defines a norm and `Lp` is a complete metric
space.
## Main definitions
* `Lp E p μ` : elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun) such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. Defined
as an `AddSubgroup` of `α →ₘ[μ] E`.
Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `Lp`. We define this action, and prove
that it is continuous. In particular,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLp` defines the action on `Lp` of a continuous linear map.
* `Lp.posPart` is the positive part of an `Lp` function.
* `Lp.negPart` is the negative part of an `Lp` function.
When `α` is a topological space equipped with a finite Borel measure, there is a bounded linear map
from the normed space of bounded continuous functions (`α →ᵇ E`) to `Lp E p μ`. We construct this
as `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp`.
## Notations
* `α →₁[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 1 μ`.
* `α →₂[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 2 μ`.
## Implementation
Since `Lp` is defined as an `AddSubgroup`, dot notation does not work. Use `Lp.Measurable f` to
say that the coercion of `f` to a genuine function is measurable, instead of the non-working
`f.Measurable`.
To prove that two `Lp` elements are equal, it suffices to show that their coercions to functions
coincide almost everywhere (this is registered as an `ext` rule). This can often be done using
`filter_upwards`. For instance, a proof from first principles that `f + (g + h) = (f + g) + h`
could read (in the `Lp` namespace)
```
example (f g h : Lp E p μ) : (f + g) + h = f + (g + h) := by
ext1
filter_upwards [coeFn_add (f + g) h, coeFn_add f g, coeFn_add f (g + h), coeFn_add g h]
with _ ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, add_assoc]
```
The lemma `coeFn_add` states that the coercion of `f + g` coincides almost everywhere with the sum
of the coercions of `f` and `g`. All such lemmas use `coeFn` in their name, to distinguish the
function coercion from the coercion to almost everywhere defined functions.
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory Uniformity
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-!
### Lp space
The space of equivalence classes of measurable functions for which `snorm f p μ < ∞`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem snorm_aeeqFun {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hf) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _)
#align measure_theory.snorm_ae_eq_fun MeasureTheory.snorm_aeeqFun
theorem Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hfp.1) p μ < ∞ := by simp [hfp.2]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top
/-- Lp space -/
def Lp {α} (E : Type*) {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : AddSubgroup (α →ₘ[μ] E) where
carrier := { f | snorm f p μ < ∞ }
zero_mem' := by simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := by
simp [snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add f g),
snorm_add_lt_top ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ ⟨g.aestronglyMeasurable, hg⟩]
neg_mem' {f} hf := by rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_neg f), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp MeasureTheory.Lp
-- Porting note: calling the first argument `α` breaks the `(α := ·)` notation
scoped notation:25 α' " →₁[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 1 μ
scoped notation:25 α' " →₂[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 2 μ
namespace Memℒp
/-- make an element of Lp from a function verifying `Memℒp` -/
def toLp (f : α → E) (h_mem_ℒp : Memℒp f p μ) : Lp E p μ :=
⟨AEEqFun.mk f h_mem_ℒp.1, h_mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp
theorem coeFn_toLp {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.toLp f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Memℒp.coeFn_toLp
theorem toLp_congr {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
hf.toLp f = hg.toLp g := by simp [toLp, hfg]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_congr MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_congr
@[simp]
theorem toLp_eq_toLp_iff {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
hf.toLp f = hg.toLp g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by simp [toLp]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_eq_to_Lp_iff MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_eq_toLp_iff
@[simp]
theorem toLp_zero (h : Memℒp (0 : α → E) p μ) : h.toLp 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_zero MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_zero
theorem toLp_add {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
(hf.add hg).toLp (f + g) = hf.toLp f + hg.toLp g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_add MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_add
theorem toLp_neg {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.neg.toLp (-f) = -hf.toLp f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_neg MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_neg
theorem toLp_sub {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
(hf.sub hg).toLp (f - g) = hf.toLp f - hg.toLp g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_sub MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_sub
end Memℒp
namespace Lp
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (Lp E p μ) (fun _ => α → E) :=
⟨fun f => ((f : α →ₘ[μ] E) : α → E)⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Lp.instCoeFun
@[ext high]
theorem ext {f g : Lp E p μ} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact AEEqFun.ext h
#align measure_theory.Lp.ext MeasureTheory.Lp.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : Lp E p μ} : f = g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h], fun h => ext h⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.ext_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.ext_iff
theorem mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ snorm f p μ < ∞ := Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top
theorem mem_Lp_iff_memℒp {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ := by
simp [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, Memℒp, f.stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_memℒp
protected theorem antitone [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) : Lp E q μ ≤ Lp E p μ :=
fun f hf => (Memℒp.memℒp_of_exponent_le ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ hpq).2
#align measure_theory.Lp.antitone MeasureTheory.Lp.antitone
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α → E) = f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_mk MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α →ₘ[μ] E) = f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_mk MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem toLp_coeFn (f : Lp E p μ) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.toLp f = f := by
cases f
simp [Memℒp.toLp]
#align measure_theory.Lp.to_Lp_coe_fn MeasureTheory.Lp.toLp_coeFn
theorem snorm_lt_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ :=
f.prop
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_lt_top
theorem snorm_ne_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
(snorm_lt_top f).ne
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_ne_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_ne_top
@[measurability]
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (f : Lp E p μ) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
f.val.stronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.Lp.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Lp.stronglyMeasurable
@[measurability]
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (f : Lp E p μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
f.val.aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Lp.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem memℒp (f : Lp E p μ) : Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f, f.prop⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.memℒp
variable (E p μ)
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : Lp E p μ) =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_zero
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_zero
variable {E p μ}
theorem coeFn_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(-f) =ᵐ[μ] -f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_neg _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_neg
theorem coeFn_add (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f + g) =ᵐ[μ] f + g :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_add _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_add MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_add
theorem coeFn_sub (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f - g) =ᵐ[μ] f - g :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_sub _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_sub MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_sub
theorem const_mem_Lp (α) {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
@AEEqFun.const α _ _ μ _ c ∈ Lp E p μ :=
(memℒp_const c).snorm_mk_lt_top
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_const MeasureTheory.Lp.const_mem_Lp
instance instNorm : Norm (Lp E p μ) where norm f := ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ)
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_norm MeasureTheory.Lp.instNorm
-- note: we need this to be defeq to the instance from `SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm`, so
-- can't use `ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ)`
instance instNNNorm : NNNorm (Lp E p μ) where nnnorm f := ⟨‖f‖, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_nnnorm MeasureTheory.Lp.instNNNorm
instance instDist : Dist (Lp E p μ) where dist f g := ‖f - g‖
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_dist MeasureTheory.Lp.instDist
instance instEDist : EDist (Lp E p μ) where edist f g := snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_edist MeasureTheory.Lp.instEDist
theorem norm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_def MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_def
theorem nnnorm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖f‖₊ = ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_def MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_def
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_nnnorm (f : Lp E p μ) : (‖f‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖f‖ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_nnnorm MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_nnnorm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nnnorm_coe_ennreal (f : Lp E p μ) : (‖f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = snorm f p μ :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal <| Lp.snorm_ne_top f
@[simp]
theorem norm_toLp (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : ‖hf.toLp f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ) := by
erw [norm_def, snorm_congr_ae (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp hf)]
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_toLp
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_toLp (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
‖hf.toLp f‖₊ = ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ) :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_toLp f hf
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_toLp
theorem coe_nnnorm_toLp {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : (‖hf.toLp f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = snorm f p μ := by
rw [nnnorm_toLp f hf, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal hf.2.ne]
theorem dist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ).toReal := by
simp_rw [dist, norm_def]
refine congr_arg _ ?_
apply snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_sub _ _)
#align measure_theory.Lp.dist_def MeasureTheory.Lp.dist_def
theorem edist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_def MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_def
protected theorem edist_dist (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = .ofReal (dist f g) := by
rw [edist_def, dist_def, ← snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_sub _ _),
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (snorm_ne_top (f - g))]
protected theorem dist_edist (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (edist f g).toReal :=
MeasureTheory.Lp.dist_def ..
theorem dist_eq_norm (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = ‖f - g‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_toLp_toLp (f g : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
edist (hf.toLp f) (hg.toLp g) = snorm (f - g) p μ := by
rw [edist_def]
exact snorm_congr_ae (hf.coeFn_toLp.sub hg.coeFn_toLp)
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_to_Lp_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_toLp_toLp
@[simp]
theorem edist_toLp_zero (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : edist (hf.toLp f) 0 = snorm f p μ := by
convert edist_toLp_toLp f 0 hf zero_memℒp
simp
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_to_Lp_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_toLp_zero
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_zero : ‖(0 : Lp E p μ)‖₊ = 0 := by
rw [nnnorm_def]
change (snorm (⇑(0 : α →ₘ[μ] E)) p μ).toNNReal = 0
simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : ‖(0 : Lp E p μ)‖ = 0 :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) nnnorm_zero
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_measure_zero (f : Lp E p (0 : MeasureTheory.Measure α)) : ‖f‖ = 0 := by
simp [norm_def]
@[simp] theorem norm_exponent_zero (f : Lp E 0 μ) : ‖f‖ = 0 := by simp [norm_def]
theorem nnnorm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ‖f‖₊ = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf => by simp [hf]⟩
rw [nnnorm_def, ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_zero_iff] at hf
cases hf with
| inl hf =>
rw [snorm_eq_zero_iff (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f) hp.ne.symm] at hf
exact Subtype.eq (AEEqFun.ext (hf.trans AEEqFun.coeFn_zero.symm))
| inr hf =>
exact absurd hf (snorm_ne_top f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_eq_zero_iff
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
NNReal.coe_eq_zero.trans (nnnorm_eq_zero_iff hp)
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero {f : Lp E p μ} : f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← (Lp.memℒp f).toLp_eq_toLp_iff zero_memℒp, Memℒp.toLp_zero, toLp_coeFn]
#align measure_theory.Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖-f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ := by
rw [nnnorm_def, nnnorm_def, snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_neg _), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_neg
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (nnnorm_neg f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_neg
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ≥0} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g‖₊ := by
simp only [nnnorm_def]
have := snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul h p
rwa [← ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toNNReal_mul,
ENNReal.toNNReal_coe] at this
· exact (Lp.memℒp _).snorm_ne_top
· exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (Lp.memℒp _).snorm_ne_top
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ c * ‖g‖ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with hc | hc
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using hc
exact NNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr (nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul h)
· simp only [norm_def]
have := snorm_eq_zero_and_zero_of_ae_le_mul_neg h hc p
simp [this]
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem norm_le_norm_of_ae_le {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
‖f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ := by
rw [norm_def, norm_def, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (snorm_ne_top _) (snorm_ne_top _)]
exact snorm_mono_ae h
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_norm_of_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_norm_of_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ≥0} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_nnnorm_le_mul (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_le_mul (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul
theorem mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_le (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_le {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ≥0)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable _ hfC
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ) (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable _ hfC
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound
theorem nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ≥0}
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * C := by
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· by_cases hp : p.toReal⁻¹ = 0
· simp [hp, hμ, nnnorm_def]
· simp [hμ, nnnorm_def, Real.zero_rpow hp]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_def, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (snorm_ne_top _)]
refine (snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_eq ?_
rw [← coe_measureUnivNNReal μ, ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).ne',
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_comm, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound
theorem norm_le_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f‖ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * C := by
lift C to ℝ≥0 using hC
have := nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound hfC
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_rpow] at this
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound
instance instNormedAddCommGroup [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedAddCommGroup (Lp E p μ) :=
{ AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := (norm : Lp E p μ → ℝ)
map_zero' := norm_zero
neg' := by simp
add_le' := fun f g => by
suffices (‖f + g‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖f‖₊ + ‖g‖₊ from mod_cast this
simp only [Lp.nnnorm_coe_ennreal]
exact (snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add _ _)).trans_le
(snorm_add_le (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _) (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _) hp.out)
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun f =>
(norm_eq_zero_iff <| zero_lt_one.trans_le hp.1).1 } with
edist := edist
edist_dist := Lp.edist_dist }
#align measure_theory.Lp.normed_add_comm_group MeasureTheory.Lp.instNormedAddCommGroup
-- check no diamond is created
example [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : PseudoEMetricSpace.toEDist = (Lp.instEDist : EDist (Lp E p μ)) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
example [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm = (Lp.instNNNorm : NNNorm (Lp E p μ)) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section BoundedSMul
variable {𝕜 𝕜' : Type*}
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜' E]
variable [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' E]
theorem const_smul_mem_Lp (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) ∈ Lp E p μ := by
rw [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_smul _ _)]
refine (snorm_const_smul_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
exact Or.inl ⟨ENNReal.coe_lt_top, f.prop⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_const_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.const_smul_mem_Lp
variable (E p μ 𝕜)
/-- The `𝕜`-submodule of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` whose `Lp` norm is finite. This is `Lp E p μ`,
with extra structure. -/
def LpSubmodule : Submodule 𝕜 (α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
{ Lp E p μ with smul_mem' := fun c f hf => by simpa using const_smul_mem_Lp c ⟨f, hf⟩ }
#align measure_theory.Lp.Lp_submodule MeasureTheory.Lp.LpSubmodule
variable {E p μ 𝕜}
theorem coe_LpSubmodule : (LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜).toAddSubgroup = Lp E p μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_Lp_submodule MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_LpSubmodule
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
{ (LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜).module with }
#align measure_theory.Lp.module MeasureTheory.Lp.instModule
theorem coeFn_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(c • f) =ᵐ[μ] c • ⇑f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_smul
instance instIsCentralScalar [Module 𝕜ᵐᵒᵖ E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜ᵐᵒᵖ E] [IsCentralScalar 𝕜 E] :
IsCentralScalar 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) where
op_smul_eq_smul k f := Subtype.ext <| op_smul_eq_smul k (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
#align measure_theory.Lp.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Lp.instIsCentralScalar
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' E] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' (Lp E p μ) where
smul_comm k k' f := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm k k' (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
#align measure_theory.Lp.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Lp.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul 𝕜 𝕜'] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' E] : IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' (Lp E p μ) where
smul_assoc k k' f := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc k k' (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
instance instBoundedSMul [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : BoundedSMul 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
-- TODO: add `BoundedSMul.of_nnnorm_smul_le`
BoundedSMul.of_norm_smul_le fun r f => by
suffices (‖r • f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖r‖₊ * ‖f‖₊ from mod_cast this
rw [nnnorm_def, nnnorm_def, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _),
snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_smul _ _), ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _)]
exact snorm_const_smul_le r f
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_bounded_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.instBoundedSMul
end BoundedSMul
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
instance instNormedSpace [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedSpace 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) where
norm_smul_le _ _ := norm_smul_le _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.normed_space MeasureTheory.Lp.instNormedSpace
end NormedSpace
end Lp
namespace Memℒp
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem toLp_const_smul {f : α → E} (c : 𝕜) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
(hf.const_smul c).toLp (c • f) = c • hf.toLp f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_const_smul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_const_smul
end Memℒp
/-! ### Indicator of a set as an element of Lᵖ
For a set `s` with `(hs : MeasurableSet s)` and `(hμs : μ s < ∞)`, we build
`indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c`, the element of `Lp` corresponding to `s.indicator (fun _ => c)`.
-/
section Indicator
variable {c : E} {f : α → E} {hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ} {s : Set α}
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_le (s : Set α) (f : α → G) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator f) μ ≤ snormEssSup f μ := by
refine essSup_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
exact Set.indicator_le_self s _ x
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_le
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : G) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator fun _ : α => c) μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ := by
by_cases hμ0 : μ = 0
· rw [hμ0, snormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact zero_le _
· exact (snormEssSup_indicator_le s fun _ => c).trans (snormEssSup_const c hμ0).le
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_const_le
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq (s : Set α) (c : G) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖₊ := by
refine le_antisymm (snormEssSup_indicator_const_le s c) ?_
by_contra! h
have h' := ae_iff.mp (ae_lt_of_essSup_lt h)
push_neg at h'
refine hμs (measure_mono_null (fun x hx_mem => ?_) h')
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.indicator_of_mem hx_mem]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_eq MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq
theorem snorm_indicator_le (f : α → E) : snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ := by
refine snorm_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
suffices ‖s.indicator f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f x‖₊ by exact NNReal.coe_mono this
rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
exact s.indicator_le_self _ x
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_le
theorem snorm_indicator_const₀ {c : G} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
have hp_pos : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top
calc
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ
= (∫⁻ x, ((‖(s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp hp_top
_ = (∫⁻ x, (s.indicator fun _ ↦ (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) x ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
congr 2
refine (Set.comp_indicator_const c (fun x : G ↦ (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) ?_)
simp [hp_pos]
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
mul_one_div_cancel hp_pos.ne', ENNReal.rpow_one]
positivity
theorem snorm_indicator_const {c : G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
snorm_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet hp hp_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const
theorem snorm_indicator_const' {c : G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq s c hμs]
· exact snorm_indicator_const hs hp hp_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const' MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const'
theorem snorm_indicator_const_le (c : G) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_zero, zero_le']
rcases eq_or_ne p ∞ with (rfl | h'p)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_top, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one]
exact snormEssSup_indicator_const_le _ _
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ snorm (t.indicator fun _ => c) p μ :=
snorm_mono (norm_indicator_le_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) _)
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ t ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
(snorm_indicator_const (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) hp h'p)
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by rw [measure_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const_le MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const_le
theorem Memℒp.indicator (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (s.indicator f) p μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.indicator hs, lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_indicator_le f) hf.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.indicator MeasureTheory.Memℒp.indicator
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict {f : α → F} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator f) μ = snormEssSup f (μ.restrict s) := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_indicator,
ENNReal.essSup_indicator_eq_essSup_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_eq_snorm_ess_sup_restrict MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict
theorem snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict {f : α → F} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ = snorm f p (μ.restrict s) := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, snorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top]
exact snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict hs
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_zero hp_top]
suffices (∫⁻ x, (‖s.indicator f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) =
∫⁻ x in s, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ by rw [this]
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ hs]
congr
simp_rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_indicator]
have h_zero : (fun x => x ^ p.toReal) (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_zero hp_top]
-- Porting note: The implicit argument should be specified because the elaborator can't deal with
-- `∘` well.
exact (Set.indicator_comp_of_zero (g := fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ p.toReal) h_zero).symm
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict
theorem memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Memℒp (s.indicator f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s) := by
simp [Memℒp, aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs, snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_indicator_iff_restrict MeasureTheory.memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict
/-- If a function is supported on a finite-measure set and belongs to `ℒ^p`, then it belongs to
`ℒ^q` for any `q ≤ p`. -/
theorem Memℒp.memℒp_of_exponent_le_of_measure_support_ne_top
{p q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfq : Memℒp f q μ) {s : Set α} (hf : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hpq : p ≤ q) : Memℒp f p μ := by
have : (toMeasurable μ s).indicator f = f := by
apply Set.indicator_eq_self.2
apply Function.support_subset_iff'.2 (fun x hx ↦ hf x ?_)
contrapose! hx
exact subset_toMeasurable μ s hx
rw [← this, memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)] at hfq ⊢
have : Fact (μ (toMeasurable μ s) < ∞) := ⟨by simpa [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using hs⟩
exact memℒp_of_exponent_le hfq hpq
theorem memℒp_indicator_const (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : E) (hμsc : c = 0 ∨ μ s ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ := by
rw [memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict hs]
rcases hμsc with rfl | hμ
· exact zero_memℒp
· have := Fact.mk hμ.lt_top
apply memℒp_const
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_indicator_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_indicator_const
/-- The `ℒ^p` norm of the indicator of a set is uniformly small if the set itself has small measure,
for any `p < ∞`. Given here as an existential `∀ ε > 0, ∃ η > 0, ...` to avoid later
management of `ℝ≥0∞`-arithmetic. -/
theorem exists_snorm_indicator_le (hp : p ≠ ∞) (c : E) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | h'p)
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ => by simp⟩
have hp₀ : 0 < p := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 h'p
have hp₀' : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := div_nonneg zero_le_one ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
have hp₀'' : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp₀.ne' hp
obtain ⟨η, hη_pos, hη_le⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * (η : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ε := by
have :
Filter.Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0 => ((‖c‖₊ * x ^ (1 / p.toReal) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞)) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0)) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
convert (NNReal.continuousAt_rpow_const (Or.inr hp₀')).tendsto.const_mul _
simp [hp₀''.ne']
have hε' : 0 < ε := hε.bot_lt
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, hδε'⟩ :=
NNReal.nhds_zero_basis.eventually_iff.mp (eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt hε' this)
obtain ⟨η, hη, hηδ⟩ := exists_between hδ
refine ⟨η, hη, ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp₀', ← ENNReal.coe_mul]
exact hδε' hηδ
refine ⟨η, hη_pos, fun s hs => ?_⟩
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans (le_trans ?_ hη_le)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow hs hp₀') _
#align measure_theory.exists_snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.exists_snorm_indicator_le
protected lemma Memℒp.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {g}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s)) (hg : Memℒp g p (μ.restrict sᶜ)) :
Memℒp (s.piecewise f g) p μ := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.piecewise hs hf.1 hg.1
refine ⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.piecewise hs hf.1 hg.1, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne p ∞ with rfl | hp_top
· rw [snorm_top_piecewise f g hs]
exact max_lt hf.2 hg.2
rw [snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top, ← lintegral_add_compl _ hs,
ENNReal.add_lt_top]
constructor
· have h : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ s →
(‖Set.piecewise s f g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal = (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal := by
filter_upwards with a ha using by simp [ha]
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun hs h]
exact lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top hf.2
· have h : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ sᶜ →
(‖Set.piecewise s f g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal = (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal := by
filter_upwards with a ha
have ha' : a ∉ s := ha
simp [ha']
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun hs.compl h]
exact lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top hg.2
end Indicator
section IndicatorConstLp
open Set Function
variable {s : Set α} {hs : MeasurableSet s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {c : E}
/-- Indicator of a set as an element of `Lp`. -/
def indicatorConstLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) : Lp E p μ :=
Memℒp.toLp (s.indicator fun _ => c) (memℒp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp
/-- A version of `Set.indicator_add` for `MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp`.-/
theorem indicatorConstLp_add {c' : E} :
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c + indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c' =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs (c + c') := by
simp_rw [indicatorConstLp, ← Memℒp.toLp_add, indicator_add]
rfl
/-- A version of `Set.indicator_sub` for `MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp`.-/
theorem indicatorConstLp_sub {c' : E} :
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c - indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c' =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs (c - c') := by
simp_rw [indicatorConstLp, ← Memℒp.toLp_sub, indicator_sub]
rfl
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn : ⇑(indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator fun _ => c :=
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn_mem : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, x ∈ s → indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c x = c :=
indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.trans (Set.indicator_of_mem hxs _)
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_mem MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn_mem
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn_nmem : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, x ∉ s → indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c x = 0 :=
indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.trans (Set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs _)
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_nmem MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn_nmem
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicatorConstLp_coeFn,
snorm_indicator_const hs hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_rpow,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp_top (hμs_ne_zero : μ s ≠ 0) :
‖indicatorConstLp ∞ hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicatorConstLp_coeFn,
snorm_indicator_const' hs hμs_ne_zero ENNReal.top_ne_zero, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero,
ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp_top MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp_top
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp' (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hμs_pos : μ s ≠ 0) :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· rw [hp_top, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero, Real.rpow_zero, mul_one]
exact norm_indicatorConstLp_top hμs_pos
· exact norm_indicatorConstLp hp_pos hp_top
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp' MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp'
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp_le :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [indicatorConstLp, Lp.norm_toLp]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (by positivity) ?_
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans_eq ?_
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_mul (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal,
ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by positivity) hμs
theorem edist_indicatorConstLp_eq_nnnorm {t : Set α} {ht : MeasurableSet t} {hμt : μ t ≠ ∞} :
edist (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) (indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c) =
‖indicatorConstLp p (hs.symmDiff ht) (measure_symmDiff_ne_top hμs hμt) c‖₊ := by
unfold indicatorConstLp
rw [Lp.edist_toLp_toLp, snorm_indicator_sub_indicator, Lp.coe_nnnorm_toLp]
theorem dist_indicatorConstLp_eq_norm {t : Set α} {ht : MeasurableSet t} {hμt : μ t ≠ ∞} :
dist (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) (indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c) =
‖indicatorConstLp p (hs.symmDiff ht) (measure_symmDiff_ne_top hμs hμt) c‖ := by
rw [Lp.dist_edist, edist_indicatorConstLp_eq_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_toReal, Lp.coe_nnnorm]
@[simp]
theorem indicatorConstLp_empty :
indicatorConstLp p MeasurableSet.empty (by simp : μ ∅ ≠ ∞) c = 0 := by
simp only [indicatorConstLp, Set.indicator_empty', Memℒp.toLp_zero]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_empty MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_empty
theorem indicatorConstLp_inj {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0)
(h : indicatorConstLp p hs hsμ c = indicatorConstLp p ht htμ c) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
.of_indicator_const hc <|
calc
s.indicator (fun _ ↦ c) =ᵐ[μ] indicatorConstLp p hs hsμ c := indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm
_ = indicatorConstLp p ht htμ c := by rw [h]
_ =ᵐ[μ] t.indicator (fun _ ↦ c) := indicatorConstLp_coeFn
theorem memℒp_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E} (h : Disjoint (support f) (support g))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
Memℒp (f + g) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ ∧ Memℒp g p μ := by
borelize E
refine ⟨fun hfg => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => h.1.add h.2⟩
· rw [← Set.indicator_add_eq_left h]; exact hfg.indicator (measurableSet_support hf.measurable)
· rw [← Set.indicator_add_eq_right h]; exact hfg.indicator (measurableSet_support hg.measurable)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_add_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.memℒp_add_of_disjoint
/-- The indicator of a disjoint union of two sets is the sum of the indicators of the sets. -/
theorem indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (hst : s ∩ t = ∅) (c : E) :
indicatorConstLp p (hs.union ht) (measure_union_ne_top hμs hμt) c =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c + indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c := by
ext1
refine indicatorConstLp_coeFn.trans (EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm)
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm)
rw [Set.indicator_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst) _]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_disjoint_union MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union
end IndicatorConstLp
section const
variable (μ p)
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E)
/-- Constant function as an element of `MeasureTheory.Lp` for a finite measure. -/
protected def Lp.const : E →+ Lp E p μ where
toFun c := ⟨AEEqFun.const α c, const_mem_Lp α μ c⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
lemma Lp.coeFn_const : Lp.const p μ c =ᵐ[μ] Function.const α c :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_const α c
@[simp] lemma Lp.const_val : (Lp.const p μ c).1 = AEEqFun.const α c := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Memℒp.toLp_const : Memℒp.toLp _ (memℒp_const c) = Lp.const p μ c := rfl
@[simp]
lemma indicatorConstLp_univ :
indicatorConstLp p .univ (measure_ne_top μ _) c = Lp.const p μ c := by
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, indicatorConstLp]
simp only [Set.indicator_univ, Function.const]
theorem Lp.norm_const [NeZero μ] (hp_zero : p ≠ 0) :
‖Lp.const p μ c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
have := NeZero.ne μ
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, Lp.norm_toLp, snorm_const] <;> try assumption
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← ENNReal.toReal_rpow, coe_nnnorm]
theorem Lp.norm_const' (hp_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
‖Lp.const p μ c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, Lp.norm_toLp, snorm_const'] <;> try assumption
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← ENNReal.toReal_rpow, coe_nnnorm]
theorem Lp.norm_const_le : ‖Lp.const p μ c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [← indicatorConstLp_univ]
exact norm_indicatorConstLp_le
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.const` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps] protected def Lp.constₗ (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] :
E →ₗ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
toFun := Lp.const p μ
map_add' := map_add _
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simps! apply]
protected def Lp.constL (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
E →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ :=
(Lp.constₗ p μ 𝕜).mkContinuous ((μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal)) fun _ ↦
(Lp.norm_const_le _ _ _).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
theorem Lp.norm_constL_le (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
‖(Lp.constL p μ 𝕜 : E →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)‖ ≤ (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by positivity) _
end const
theorem Memℒp.norm_rpow_div {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (q : ℝ≥0∞) :
Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal) (p / q) μ := by
refine ⟨(hf.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow_const q.toReal).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
by_cases q_top : q = ∞
· simp [q_top]
by_cases q_zero : q = 0
· simp [q_zero]
by_cases p_zero : p = 0
· simp [p_zero]
rw [ENNReal.div_zero p_zero]
exact (memℒp_top_const (1 : ℝ)).2
rw [snorm_norm_rpow _ (ENNReal.toReal_pos q_zero q_top)]
apply ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal q_top, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel q_zero q_top,
mul_one]
exact hf.2.ne
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm_rpow_div MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm_rpow_div
theorem memℒp_norm_rpow_iff {q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (q_zero : q ≠ 0)
(q_top : q ≠ ∞) : Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal) (p / q) μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.norm_rpow_div q⟩
apply (memℒp_norm_iff hf).1
convert h.norm_rpow_div q⁻¹ using 1
· ext x
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), ← Real.rpow_mul (abs_nonneg _),
ENNReal.toReal_inv, mul_inv_cancel, abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), Real.rpow_one]
simp [ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, not_or, q_zero, q_top]
· rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel q_zero q_top,
mul_one]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_norm_rpow_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_norm_rpow_iff
theorem Memℒp.norm_rpow {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) 1 μ := by
convert hf.norm_rpow_div p
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm_rpow MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm_rpow
theorem AEEqFun.compMeasurePreserving_mem_Lp {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
{μb : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {g : β →ₘ[μb] E} (hg : g ∈ Lp E p μb) {f : α → β}
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf ∈ Lp E p μ := by
rw [Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top] at hg ⊢
rwa [snorm_compMeasurePreserving]
namespace Lp
/-! ### Composition with a measure preserving function -/
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {μb : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {f : α → β}
/-- Composition of an `L^p` function with a measure preserving function is an `L^p` function. -/
def compMeasurePreserving (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →+ Lp E p μ where
toFun g := ⟨g.1.compMeasurePreserving f hf, g.1.compMeasurePreserving_mem_Lp g.2 hf⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := by rintro ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMeasurePreserving_val (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
(compMeasurePreserving f hf g).1 = g.1.compMeasurePreserving f hf :=
rfl
theorem coeFn_compMeasurePreserving (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
compMeasurePreserving f hf g =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
g.1.coeFn_compMeasurePreserving hf
@[simp]
theorem norm_compMeasurePreserving (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
‖compMeasurePreserving f hf g‖ = ‖g‖ :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toReal <| g.1.snorm_compMeasurePreserving hf
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.compMeasurePreserving` as a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def compMeasurePreservingₗ (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →ₗ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
__ := compMeasurePreserving f hf
map_smul' c g := by rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.compMeasurePreserving` as a linear isometry. -/
@[simps!]
def compMeasurePreservingₗᵢ [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →ₗᵢ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
toLinearMap := compMeasurePreservingₗ 𝕜 f hf
norm_map' := (norm_compMeasurePreserving · hf)
end Lp
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
/-!
### Composition on `L^p`
We show that Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `L^p`, and specialize
this to the composition with continuous linear maps, and to the definition of the positive
part of an `L^p` function.
-/
section Composition
variable {g : E → F} {c : ℝ≥0}
theorem LipschitzWith.comp_memℒp {α E F} {K} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(g0 : g 0 = 0) (hL : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ :=
have : ∀ x, ‖g (f x)‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := fun x ↦ by
-- TODO: add `LipschitzWith.nnnorm_sub_le` and `LipschitzWith.nnnorm_le`
simpa [g0] using hg.norm_sub_le (f x) 0
hL.of_le_mul (hg.continuous.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hL.1) (eventually_of_forall this)
#align lipschitz_with.comp_mem_ℒp LipschitzWith.comp_memℒp
theorem MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_comp_antilipschitzWith {α E F} {K'} [MeasurableSpace α]
{μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F}
(hL : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ) (hg : UniformContinuous g) (hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g)
(g0 : g 0 = 0) : Memℒp f p μ := by
have A : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ K' * ‖g (f x)‖ := by
intro x
-- TODO: add `AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm_sub` and `AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm`
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0]
apply hg'.le_mul_dist
have B : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
(hg'.uniformEmbedding hg).embedding.aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff.1 hL.1
exact hL.of_le_mul B (Filter.eventually_of_forall A)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_comp_antilipschitz_with MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_comp_antilipschitzWith
namespace LipschitzWith
theorem memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {α E F} {K K'} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => h.of_comp_antilipschitzWith hg.uniformContinuous hg' g0, fun h => hg.comp_memℒp g0 h⟩
#align lipschitz_with.mem_ℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz LipschitzWith.memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz
/-- When `g` is a Lipschitz function sending `0` to `0` and `f` is in `Lp`, then `g ∘ f` is well
defined as an element of `Lp`. -/
def compLp (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
⟨AEEqFun.comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E), by
suffices ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖AEEqFun.comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) x‖ ≤ c * ‖f x‖ from
Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul this
filter_upwards [AEEqFun.coeFn_comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)] with a ha
simp only [ha]
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0]
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) 0⟩
#align lipschitz_with.comp_Lp LipschitzWith.compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
hg.compLp g0 f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_comp _ hg.continuous _
#align lipschitz_with.coe_fn_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.coeFn_compLp
@[simp]
theorem compLp_zero (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) : hg.compLp g0 (0 : Lp E p μ) = 0 := by
rw [Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero]
apply (coeFn_compLp _ _ _).trans
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_zero E p μ] with _ ha
simp only [ha, g0, Function.comp_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align lipschitz_with.comp_Lp_zero LipschitzWith.compLp_zero
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSpace.lean | 1,094 | 1,100 | theorem norm_compLp_sub_le (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f f' : Lp E p μ) :
‖hg.compLp g0 f - hg.compLp g0 f'‖ ≤ c * ‖f - f'‖ := by |
apply Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
filter_upwards [hg.coeFn_compLp g0 f, hg.coeFn_compLp g0 f',
Lp.coeFn_sub (hg.compLp g0 f) (hg.compLp g0 f'), Lp.coeFn_sub f f'] with a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ← dist_eq_norm, Pi.sub_apply, Function.comp_apply]
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) (f' a)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import linear_algebra.quadratic_form.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d11f435d4e34a6cea0a1797d6b625b0c170be845"
/-!
# Quadratic forms
This file defines quadratic forms over a `R`-module `M`.
A quadratic form on a commutative ring `R` is a map `Q : M → R` such that:
* `QuadraticForm.map_smul`: `Q (a • x) = a * a * Q x`
* `QuadraticForm.polar_add_left`, `QuadraticForm.polar_add_right`,
`QuadraticForm.polar_smul_left`, `QuadraticForm.polar_smul_right`:
the map `QuadraticForm.polar Q := fun x y ↦ Q (x + y) - Q x - Q y` is bilinear.
This notion generalizes to commutative semirings using the approach in [izhakian2016][] which
requires that there be a (possibly non-unique) companion bilinear form `B` such that
`∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y`. Over a ring, this `B` is precisely `QuadraticForm.polar Q`.
To build a `QuadraticForm` from the `polar` axioms, use `QuadraticForm.ofPolar`.
Quadratic forms come with a scalar multiplication, `(a • Q) x = Q (a • x) = a * a * Q x`,
and composition with linear maps `f`, `Q.comp f x = Q (f x)`.
## Main definitions
* `QuadraticForm.ofPolar`: a more familiar constructor that works on rings
* `QuadraticForm.associated`: associated bilinear form
* `QuadraticForm.PosDef`: positive definite quadratic forms
* `QuadraticForm.Anisotropic`: anisotropic quadratic forms
* `QuadraticForm.discr`: discriminant of a quadratic form
* `QuadraticForm.IsOrtho`: orthogonality of vectors with respect to a quadratic form.
## Main statements
* `QuadraticForm.associated_left_inverse`,
* `QuadraticForm.associated_rightInverse`: in a commutative ring where 2 has
an inverse, there is a correspondence between quadratic forms and symmetric
bilinear forms
* `LinearMap.BilinForm.exists_orthogonal_basis`: There exists an orthogonal basis with
respect to any nondegenerate, symmetric bilinear form `B`.
## Notation
In this file, the variable `R` is used when a `CommSemiring` structure is available.
The variable `S` is used when `R` itself has a `•` action.
## Implementation notes
While the definition and many results make sense if we drop commutativity assumptions,
the correct definition of a quadratic form in the noncommutative setting would require
substantial refactors from the current version, such that $Q(rm) = rQ(m)r^*$ for some
suitable conjugation $r^*$.
The [Zulip thread](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/Quadratic.20Maps/near/395529867)
has some further discusion.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant#Quadratic_forms
## Tags
quadratic form, homogeneous polynomial, quadratic polynomial
-/
universe u v w
variable {S T : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {M N : Type*}
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
section Polar
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M]
namespace QuadraticForm
/-- Up to a factor 2, `Q.polar` is the associated bilinear form for a quadratic form `Q`.
Source of this name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_form#Generalization
-/
def polar (f : M → R) (x y : M) :=
f (x + y) - f x - f y
#align quadratic_form.polar QuadraticForm.polar
theorem polar_add (f g : M → R) (x y : M) : polar (f + g) x y = polar f x y + polar g x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.add_apply]
abel
#align quadratic_form.polar_add QuadraticForm.polar_add
theorem polar_neg (f : M → R) (x y : M) : polar (-f) x y = -polar f x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.neg_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
#align quadratic_form.polar_neg QuadraticForm.polar_neg
theorem polar_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (f : M → R) (s : S) (x y : M) :
polar (s • f) x y = s • polar f x y := by simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub]
#align quadratic_form.polar_smul QuadraticForm.polar_smul
theorem polar_comm (f : M → R) (x y : M) : polar f x y = polar f y x := by
rw [polar, polar, add_comm, sub_sub, sub_sub, add_comm (f x) (f y)]
#align quadratic_form.polar_comm QuadraticForm.polar_comm
/-- Auxiliary lemma to express bilinearity of `QuadraticForm.polar` without subtraction. -/
theorem polar_add_left_iff {f : M → R} {x x' y : M} :
polar f (x + x') y = polar f x y + polar f x' y ↔
f (x + x' + y) + (f x + f x' + f y) = f (x + x') + f (x' + y) + f (y + x) := by
simp only [← add_assoc]
simp only [polar, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_sub]
simp only [add_right_comm _ (f y) _, add_right_comm _ (f x') (f x)]
rw [add_comm y x, add_right_comm _ _ (f (x + y)), add_comm _ (f (x + y)),
add_right_comm (f (x + y)), add_left_inj]
#align quadratic_form.polar_add_left_iff QuadraticForm.polar_add_left_iff
theorem polar_comp {F : Type*} [CommRing S] [FunLike F R S] [AddMonoidHomClass F R S]
(f : M → R) (g : F) (x y : M) :
polar (g ∘ f) x y = g (polar f x y) := by
simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, Function.comp_apply, map_sub]
#align quadratic_form.polar_comp QuadraticForm.polar_comp
end QuadraticForm
end Polar
/-- A quadratic form over a module.
For a more familiar constructor when `R` is a ring, see `QuadraticForm.ofPolar`. -/
structure QuadraticForm (R : Type u) (M : Type v)
[CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] where
toFun : M → R
toFun_smul : ∀ (a : R) (x : M), toFun (a • x) = a * a * toFun x
exists_companion' :
∃ B : BilinForm R M, ∀ x y, toFun (x + y) = toFun x + toFun y + B x y
#align quadratic_form QuadraticForm
namespace QuadraticForm
section DFunLike
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {Q Q' : QuadraticForm R M}
instance instFunLike : FunLike (QuadraticForm R M) M R where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' x y h := by cases x; cases y; congr
#align quadratic_form.fun_like QuadraticForm.instFunLike
/-- Helper instance for when there's too many metavariables to apply
`DFunLike.hasCoeToFun` directly. -/
instance : CoeFun (QuadraticForm R M) fun _ => M → R :=
⟨DFunLike.coe⟩
variable (Q)
/-- The `simp` normal form for a quadratic form is `DFunLike.coe`, not `toFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : Q.toFun = ⇑Q :=
rfl
#align quadratic_form.to_fun_eq_coe QuadraticForm.toFun_eq_coe
-- this must come after the coe_to_fun definition
initialize_simps_projections QuadraticForm (toFun → apply)
variable {Q}
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x : M, Q x = Q' x) : Q = Q' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
#align quadratic_form.ext QuadraticForm.ext
theorem congr_fun (h : Q = Q') (x : M) : Q x = Q' x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
#align quadratic_form.congr_fun QuadraticForm.congr_fun
theorem ext_iff : Q = Q' ↔ ∀ x, Q x = Q' x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align quadratic_form.ext_iff QuadraticForm.ext_iff
/-- Copy of a `QuadraticForm` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
protected def copy (Q : QuadraticForm R M) (Q' : M → R) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : QuadraticForm R M where
toFun := Q'
toFun_smul := h.symm ▸ Q.toFun_smul
exists_companion' := h.symm ▸ Q.exists_companion'
#align quadratic_form.copy QuadraticForm.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (Q : QuadraticForm R M) (Q' : M → R) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : ⇑(Q.copy Q' h) = Q' :=
rfl
#align quadratic_form.coe_copy QuadraticForm.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (Q : QuadraticForm R M) (Q' : M → R) (h : Q' = ⇑Q) : Q.copy Q' h = Q :=
DFunLike.ext' h
#align quadratic_form.copy_eq QuadraticForm.copy_eq
end DFunLike
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
theorem map_smul (a : R) (x : M) : Q (a • x) = a * a * Q x :=
Q.toFun_smul a x
#align quadratic_form.map_smul QuadraticForm.map_smul
theorem exists_companion : ∃ B : BilinForm R M, ∀ x y, Q (x + y) = Q x + Q y + B x y :=
Q.exists_companion'
#align quadratic_form.exists_companion QuadraticForm.exists_companion
theorem map_add_add_add_map (x y z : M) :
Q (x + y + z) + (Q x + Q y + Q z) = Q (x + y) + Q (y + z) + Q (z + x) := by
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
rw [add_comm z x]
simp only [h, map_add, LinearMap.add_apply]
abel
#align quadratic_form.map_add_add_add_map QuadraticForm.map_add_add_add_map
theorem map_add_self (x : M) : Q (x + x) = 4 * Q x := by
rw [← one_smul R x, ← add_smul, map_smul]
norm_num
#align quadratic_form.map_add_self QuadraticForm.map_add_self
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] because it is superseded by `ZeroHomClass.map_zero`
theorem map_zero : Q 0 = 0 := by
rw [← @zero_smul R _ _ _ _ (0 : M), map_smul, zero_mul, zero_mul]
#align quadratic_form.map_zero QuadraticForm.map_zero
instance zeroHomClass : ZeroHomClass (QuadraticForm R M) M R where
map_zero := map_zero
#align quadratic_form.zero_hom_class QuadraticForm.zeroHomClass
theorem map_smul_of_tower [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] (a : S)
(x : M) : Q (a • x) = (a * a) • Q x := by
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul R a x, map_smul, ← RingHom.map_mul, Algebra.smul_def]
#align quadratic_form.map_smul_of_tower QuadraticForm.map_smul_of_tower
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M]
variable [Module R M] (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
@[simp]
theorem map_neg (x : M) : Q (-x) = Q x := by
rw [← @neg_one_smul R _ _ _ _ x, map_smul, neg_one_mul, neg_neg, one_mul]
#align quadratic_form.map_neg QuadraticForm.map_neg
theorem map_sub (x y : M) : Q (x - y) = Q (y - x) := by rw [← neg_sub, map_neg]
#align quadratic_form.map_sub QuadraticForm.map_sub
@[simp]
theorem polar_zero_left (y : M) : polar Q 0 y = 0 := by
simp only [polar, zero_add, QuadraticForm.map_zero, sub_zero, sub_self]
#align quadratic_form.polar_zero_left QuadraticForm.polar_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem polar_add_left (x x' y : M) : polar Q (x + x') y = polar Q x y + polar Q x' y :=
polar_add_left_iff.mpr <| Q.map_add_add_add_map x x' y
#align quadratic_form.polar_add_left QuadraticForm.polar_add_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Basic.lean | 275 | 277 | theorem polar_smul_left (a : R) (x y : M) : polar Q (a • x) y = a * polar Q x y := by |
obtain ⟨B, h⟩ := Q.exists_companion
simp_rw [polar, h, Q.map_smul, LinearMap.map_smul₂, sub_sub, add_sub_cancel_left, smul_eq_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Bounds
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
#align_import data.real.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cb42593171ba005beaaf4549fcfe0dece9ada4c9"
/-!
# The real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring, and a conditionally complete linear order.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise CauSeq
namespace Real
instance instArchimedean : Archimedean ℝ :=
archimedean_iff_rat_le.2 fun x =>
Real.ind_mk x fun f =>
let ⟨M, _, H⟩ := f.bounded' 0
⟨M, mk_le_of_forall_le ⟨0, fun i _ => Rat.cast_le.2 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H i)).2⟩⟩
#align real.archimedean Real.instArchimedean
noncomputable instance : FloorRing ℝ :=
Archimedean.floorRing _
theorem isCauSeq_iff_lift {f : ℕ → ℚ} : IsCauSeq abs f ↔ IsCauSeq abs fun i => (f i : ℝ) where
mp H ε ε0 :=
let ⟨δ, δ0, δε⟩ := exists_pos_rat_lt ε0
(H _ δ0).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp; exact lt_trans (mod_cast hi _ ij) δε
mpr H ε ε0 :=
(H _ (Rat.cast_pos.2 ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp at hi; exact mod_cast hi _ ij
#align real.is_cau_seq_iff_lift Real.isCauSeq_iff_lift
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → ℚ) (x : ℝ) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| < ε) :
∃ h', Real.mk ⟨f, h'⟩ = x :=
⟨isCauSeq_iff_lift.2 (CauSeq.of_near _ (const abs x) h),
sub_eq_zero.1 <|
abs_eq_zero.1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense (abs_nonneg _)) fun _ε ε0 =>
mk_near_of_forall_near <| (h _ ε0).imp fun _i h j ij => le_of_lt (h j ij)⟩
#align real.of_near Real.of_near
theorem exists_floor (x : ℝ) : ∃ ub : ℤ, (ub : ℝ) ≤ x ∧ ∀ z : ℤ, (z : ℝ) ≤ x → z ≤ ub :=
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_gt x
⟨n, fun _ h' => Int.cast_le.1 <| le_trans h' <| le_of_lt hn⟩)
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_lt x
⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩)
#align real.exists_floor Real.exists_floor
theorem exists_isLUB {S : Set ℝ} (hne : S.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddAbove S) : ∃ x, IsLUB S x := by
rcases hne, hbdd with ⟨⟨L, hL⟩, ⟨U, hU⟩⟩
have : ∀ d : ℕ, BddAbove { m : ℤ | ∃ y ∈ S, (m : ℝ) ≤ y * d } := by
cases' exists_int_gt U with k hk
refine fun d => ⟨k * d, fun z h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine Int.cast_le.1 (hy.trans ?_)
push_cast
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((hU yS).trans hk.le) d.cast_nonneg
choose f hf using fun d : ℕ =>
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd (this d) ⟨⌊L * d⌋, L, hL, Int.floor_le _⟩
have hf₁ : ∀ n > 0, ∃ y ∈ S, ((f n / n : ℚ) : ℝ) ≤ y := fun n n0 =>
let ⟨y, yS, hy⟩ := (hf n).1
⟨y, yS, by simpa using (div_le_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _)).2 hy⟩
have hf₂ : ∀ n > 0, ∀ y ∈ S, (y - ((n : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) < (f n / n : ℚ) := by
intro n n0 y yS
have := (Int.sub_one_lt_floor _).trans_le (Int.cast_le.2 <| (hf n).2 _ ⟨y, yS, Int.floor_le _⟩)
simp only [Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_intCast, Rat.cast_natCast, gt_iff_lt]
rwa [lt_div_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _), sub_mul, _root_.inv_mul_cancel]
exact ne_of_gt (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0)
have hg : IsCauSeq abs (fun n => f n / n : ℕ → ℚ) := by
intro ε ε0
suffices ∀ j ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, ∀ k ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, (f j / j - f k / k : ℚ) < ε by
refine ⟨_, fun j ij => abs_lt.2 ⟨?_, this _ ij _ le_rfl⟩⟩
rw [neg_lt, neg_sub]
exact this _ le_rfl _ ij
intro j ij k ik
replace ij := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ij)
replace ik := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ik)
have j0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ij)
have k0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ik)
rcases hf₁ _ j0 with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((Rat.cast_lt (K := ℝ)).1 ?_) ((inv_le ε0 (Nat.cast_pos.2 k0)).1 ik)
simpa using sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt hy <| sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1 <| hf₂ _ k0 _ yS)
let g : CauSeq ℚ abs := ⟨fun n => f n / n, hg⟩
refine ⟨mk g, ⟨fun x xS => ?_, fun y h => ?_⟩⟩
· refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense fun z xz => ?_
cases' exists_nat_gt (x - z)⁻¹ with K hK
refine le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨K, fun n nK => ?_⟩
replace xz := sub_pos.2 xz
replace hK := hK.le.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 nK)
have n0 : 0 < n := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 xz).trans_le hK)
refine le_trans ?_ (hf₂ _ n0 _ xS).le
rwa [le_sub_comm, inv_le (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _) xz]
· exact
mk_le_of_forall_le
⟨1, fun n n1 =>
let ⟨x, xS, hx⟩ := hf₁ _ n1
le_trans hx (h xS)⟩
#align real.exists_is_lub Real.exists_isLUB
/-- A nonempty, bounded below set of real numbers has a greatest lower bound. -/
theorem exists_isGLB {S : Set ℝ} (hne : S.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddBelow S) : ∃ x, IsGLB S x := by
have hne' : (-S).Nonempty := Set.nonempty_neg.mpr hne
have hbdd' : BddAbove (-S) := bddAbove_neg.mpr hbdd
use -Classical.choose (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
rw [← isLUB_neg]
exact Classical.choose_spec (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℝ :=
⟨fun S => if h : S.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove S then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0⟩
theorem sSup_def (S : Set ℝ) :
sSup S = if h : S.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove S then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0 :=
rfl
#align real.Sup_def Real.sSup_def
protected theorem isLUB_sSup (S : Set ℝ) (h₁ : S.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddAbove S) :
IsLUB S (sSup S) := by
simp only [sSup_def, dif_pos (And.intro h₁ h₂)]
apply Classical.choose_spec
#align real.is_lub_Sup Real.isLUB_sSup
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℝ :=
⟨fun S => -sSup (-S)⟩
theorem sInf_def (S : Set ℝ) : sInf S = -sSup (-S) :=
rfl
#align real.Inf_def Real.sInf_def
protected theorem is_glb_sInf (S : Set ℝ) (h₁ : S.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddBelow S) :
IsGLB S (sInf S) := by
rw [sInf_def, ← isLUB_neg', neg_neg]
exact Real.isLUB_sSup _ h₁.neg h₂.neg
#align real.is_glb_Inf Real.is_glb_sInf
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder ℝ :=
{ Real.linearOrder, Real.lattice with
sSup := SupSet.sSup
sInf := InfSet.sInf
le_csSup := fun s a hs ha => (Real.isLUB_sSup s ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
csSup_le := fun s a hs ha => (Real.isLUB_sSup s hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csInf_le := fun s a hs ha => (Real.is_glb_sInf s ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
le_csInf := fun s a hs ha => (Real.is_glb_sInf s hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s hs ↦ by simp [hs, sSup_def]
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s hs ↦ by simp [hs, sInf_def, sSup_def] }
theorem lt_sInf_add_pos {s : Set ℝ} (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ a ∈ s, a < sInf s + ε :=
exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
#align real.lt_Inf_add_pos Real.lt_sInf_add_pos
theorem add_neg_lt_sSup {s : Set ℝ} (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ a ∈ s, sSup s + ε < a :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h <| add_lt_iff_neg_left.2 hε
#align real.add_neg_lt_Sup Real.add_neg_lt_sSup
theorem sInf_le_iff {s : Set ℝ} (h : BddBelow s) (h' : s.Nonempty) {a : ℝ} :
sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x ∈ s, x < a + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
constructor <;> intro H ε ε_pos
· exact exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h' (H ε ε_pos)
· rcases H ε ε_pos with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact csInf_lt_of_lt h x_in hx
#align real.Inf_le_iff Real.sInf_le_iff
theorem le_sSup_iff {s : Set ℝ} (h : BddAbove s) (h' : s.Nonempty) {a : ℝ} :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ ε, ε < 0 → ∃ x ∈ s, a + ε < x := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
refine ⟨fun H ε ε_neg => ?_, fun H ε ε_pos => ?_⟩
· exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h' (lt_sub_iff_add_lt.mp (H _ (neg_pos.mpr ε_neg)))
· rcases H _ (neg_lt_zero.mpr ε_pos) with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add.mp (lt_csSup_of_lt h x_in hx)
#align real.le_Sup_iff Real.le_sSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set ℝ) = 0 :=
dif_neg <| by simp
#align real.Sup_empty Real.sSup_empty
@[simp] lemma iSup_of_isEmpty {α : Sort*} [IsEmpty α] (f : α → ℝ) : ⨆ i, f i = 0 := by
dsimp [iSup]
convert Real.sSup_empty
rw [Set.range_eq_empty_iff]
infer_instance
#align real.csupr_empty Real.iSup_of_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem ciSup_const_zero {α : Sort*} : ⨆ _ : α, (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· exact Real.iSup_of_isEmpty _
· exact ciSup_const
#align real.csupr_const_zero Real.ciSup_const_zero
theorem sSup_of_not_bddAbove {s : Set ℝ} (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun h => hs h.2
#align real.Sup_of_not_bdd_above Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove
theorem iSup_of_not_bddAbove {α : Sort*} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ¬BddAbove (Set.range f)) :
⨆ i, f i = 0 :=
sSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
#align real.supr_of_not_bdd_above Real.iSup_of_not_bddAbove
theorem sSup_univ : sSup (@Set.univ ℝ) = 0 := Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove not_bddAbove_univ
#align real.Sup_univ Real.sSup_univ
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [sInf_def, sSup_empty]
#align real.Inf_empty Real.sInf_empty
@[simp] nonrec lemma iInf_of_isEmpty {α : Sort*} [IsEmpty α] (f : α → ℝ) : ⨅ i, f i = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
#align real.cinfi_empty Real.iInf_of_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem ciInf_const_zero {α : Sort*} : ⨅ _ : α, (0 : ℝ) = 0 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· exact Real.iInf_of_isEmpty _
· exact ciInf_const
#align real.cinfi_const_zero Real.ciInf_const_zero
theorem sInf_of_not_bddBelow {s : Set ℝ} (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = 0 :=
neg_eq_zero.2 <| sSup_of_not_bddAbove <| mt bddAbove_neg.1 hs
#align real.Inf_of_not_bdd_below Real.sInf_of_not_bddBelow
theorem iInf_of_not_bddBelow {α : Sort*} {f : α → ℝ} (hf : ¬BddBelow (Set.range f)) :
⨅ i, f i = 0 :=
sInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
#align real.infi_of_not_bdd_below Real.iInf_of_not_bddBelow
/--
As `0` is the default value for `Real.sSup` of the empty set or sets which are not bounded above, it
suffices to show that `S` is bounded below by `0` to show that `0 ≤ sSup S`.
-/
theorem sSup_nonneg (S : Set ℝ) (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sSup S := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩)
· exact sSup_empty.ge
· apply dite _ (fun h => le_csSup_of_le h hy <| hS y hy) fun h => (sSup_of_not_bddAbove h).ge
#align real.Sup_nonneg Real.sSup_nonneg
/--
As `0` is the default value for `Real.sSup` of the empty set or sets which are not bounded above, it
suffices to show that `f i` is nonnegative to show that `0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i`.
-/
protected theorem iSup_nonneg {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ} (hf : ∀ i, 0 ≤ f i) : 0 ≤ ⨆ i, f i :=
sSup_nonneg _ <| Set.forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align real.supr_nonneg Real.iSup_nonneg
/--
As `0` is the default value for `Real.sSup` of the empty set or sets which are not bounded above, it
suffices to show that all elements of `S` are bounded by a nonnegative number to show that `sSup S`
is bounded by this number.
-/
protected theorem sSup_le {S : Set ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, x ≤ a) (ha : 0 ≤ a) : sSup S ≤ a := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hS₂)
exacts [sSup_empty.trans_le ha, csSup_le hS₂ hS]
#align real.Sup_le Real.sSup_le
protected theorem iSup_le {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (hS : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
⨆ i, f i ≤ a :=
Real.sSup_le (Set.forall_mem_range.2 hS) ha
#align real.supr_le Real.iSup_le
/-- As `0` is the default value for `Real.sSup` of the empty set, it suffices to show that `S` is
bounded above by `0` to show that `sSup S ≤ 0`.
-/
theorem sSup_nonpos (S : Set ℝ) (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, x ≤ (0 : ℝ)) : sSup S ≤ 0 :=
Real.sSup_le hS le_rfl
#align real.Sup_nonpos Real.sSup_nonpos
/-- As `0` is the default value for `Real.sInf` of the empty set, it suffices to show that `S` is
bounded below by `0` to show that `0 ≤ sInf S`.
-/
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean | 281 | 283 | theorem sInf_nonneg (S : Set ℝ) (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) : 0 ≤ sInf S := by |
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hS₂)
exacts [sInf_empty.ge, le_csInf hS₂ hS]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Product measures
In this file we define and prove properties about finite products of measures
(and at some point, countable products of measures).
## Main definition
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`: The product of finitely many σ-finite measures.
Given `μ : (i : ι) → Measure (α i)` for `[Fintype ι]` it has type `Measure ((i : ι) → α i)`.
To apply Fubini's theorem or Tonelli's theorem along some subset, we recommend using the marginal
construction `MeasureTheory.lmarginal` and (todo) `MeasureTheory.marginal`. This allows you to
apply the theorems without any bookkeeping with measurable equivalences.
## Implementation Notes
We define `MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.pi`, the product of finitely many outer measures, as the
maximal outer measure `n` with the property that `n (pi univ s) ≤ ∏ i, m i (s i)`,
where `pi univ s` is the product of the sets `{s i | i : ι}`.
We then show that this induces a product of measures, called `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
For a collection of σ-finite measures `μ` and a collection of measurable sets `s` we show that
`Measure.pi μ (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i)`. To do this, we follow the following steps:
* We know that there is some ordering on `ι`, given by an element of `[Countable ι]`.
* Using this, we have an equivalence `MeasurableEquiv.piMeasurableEquivTProd` between
`∀ ι, α i` and an iterated product of `α i`, called `List.tprod α l` for some list `l`.
* On this iterated product we can easily define a product measure `MeasureTheory.Measure.tprod`
by iterating `MeasureTheory.Measure.prod`
* Using the previous two steps we construct `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` on `(i : ι) → α i` for
countable `ι`.
* We know that `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi'` sends products of sets to products of measures, and
since `MeasureTheory.Measure.pi` is the maximal such measure (or at least, it comes from an outer
measure which is the maximal such outer measure), we get the same rule for
`MeasureTheory.Measure.pi`.
## Tags
finitary product measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Set MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure Filter MeasurableSpace Encodable
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal
universe u v
variable {ι ι' : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
/-! We start with some measurability properties -/
/-- Boxes formed by π-systems form a π-system. -/
theorem IsPiSystem.pi {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsPiSystem (C i)) :
IsPiSystem (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
rintro _ ⟨s₁, hs₁, rfl⟩ _ ⟨s₂, hs₂, rfl⟩ hst
rw [← pi_inter_distrib] at hst ⊢; rw [univ_pi_nonempty_iff] at hst
exact mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ => hC i _ (hs₁ i (mem_univ i)) _ (hs₂ i (mem_univ i)) (hst i)
#align is_pi_system.pi IsPiSystem.pi
/-- Boxes form a π-system. -/
theorem isPiSystem_pi [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
IsPiSystem (pi univ '' pi univ fun i => { s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s }) :=
IsPiSystem.pi fun _ => isPiSystem_measurableSet
#align is_pi_system_pi isPiSystem_pi
section Finite
variable [Finite ι] [Finite ι']
/-- Boxes of countably spanning sets are countably spanning. -/
theorem IsCountablySpanning.pi {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsCountablySpanning (C i)) :
IsCountablySpanning (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
choose s h1s h2s using hC
cases nonempty_encodable (ι → ℕ)
let e : ℕ → ι → ℕ := fun n => (@decode (ι → ℕ) _ n).iget
refine ⟨fun n => Set.pi univ fun i => s i (e n i), fun n =>
mem_image_of_mem _ fun i _ => h1s i _, ?_⟩
simp_rw [(surjective_decode_iget (ι → ℕ)).iUnion_comp fun x => Set.pi univ fun i => s i (x i),
iUnion_univ_pi s, h2s, pi_univ]
#align is_countably_spanning.pi IsCountablySpanning.pi
/-- The product of generated σ-algebras is the one generated by boxes, if both generating sets
are countably spanning. -/
theorem generateFrom_pi_eq {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsCountablySpanning (C i)) :
(@MeasurableSpace.pi _ _ fun i => generateFrom (C i)) =
generateFrom (pi univ '' pi univ C) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
apply le_antisymm
· refine iSup_le ?_; intro i; rw [comap_generateFrom]
apply generateFrom_le; rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩; dsimp
choose t h1t h2t using hC
simp_rw [eval_preimage, ← h2t]
rw [← @iUnion_const _ ℕ _ s]
have : Set.pi univ (update (fun i' : ι => iUnion (t i')) i (⋃ _ : ℕ, s)) =
Set.pi univ fun k => ⋃ j : ℕ,
@update ι (fun i' => Set (α i')) _ (fun i' => t i' j) i s k := by
ext; simp_rw [mem_univ_pi]; apply forall_congr'; intro i'
by_cases h : i' = i
· subst h; simp
· rw [← Ne] at h; simp [h]
rw [this, ← iUnion_univ_pi]
apply MeasurableSet.iUnion
intro n; apply measurableSet_generateFrom
apply mem_image_of_mem; intro j _; dsimp only
by_cases h : j = i
· subst h; rwa [update_same]
· rw [update_noteq h]; apply h1t
· apply generateFrom_le; rintro _ ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
rw [univ_pi_eq_iInter]; apply MeasurableSet.iInter; intro i
apply @measurable_pi_apply _ _ (fun i => generateFrom (C i))
exact measurableSet_generateFrom (hs i (mem_univ i))
#align generate_from_pi_eq generateFrom_pi_eq
/-- If `C` and `D` generate the σ-algebras on `α` resp. `β`, then rectangles formed by `C` and `D`
generate the σ-algebra on `α × β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_eq_pi [h : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))}
(hC : ∀ i, generateFrom (C i) = h i) (h2C : ∀ i, IsCountablySpanning (C i)) :
generateFrom (pi univ '' pi univ C) = MeasurableSpace.pi := by
simp only [← funext hC, generateFrom_pi_eq h2C]
#align generate_from_eq_pi generateFrom_eq_pi
/-- The product σ-algebra is generated from boxes, i.e. `s ×ˢ t` for sets `s : set α` and
`t : set β`. -/
theorem generateFrom_pi [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
generateFrom (pi univ '' pi univ fun i => { s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s }) =
MeasurableSpace.pi :=
generateFrom_eq_pi (fun _ => generateFrom_measurableSet) fun _ =>
isCountablySpanning_measurableSet
#align generate_from_pi generateFrom_pi
end Finite
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [Fintype ι] {m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)}
/-- An upper bound for the measure in a finite product space.
It is defined to by taking the image of the set under all projections, and taking the product
of the measures of these images.
For measurable boxes it is equal to the correct measure. -/
@[simp]
def piPremeasure (m : ∀ i, OuterMeasure (α i)) (s : Set (∀ i, α i)) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∏ i, m i (eval i '' s)
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure MeasureTheory.piPremeasure
theorem piPremeasure_pi {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} (hs : (pi univ s).Nonempty) :
piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by simp [hs, piPremeasure]
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi
theorem piPremeasure_pi' {s : ∀ i, Set (α i)} : piPremeasure m (pi univ s) = ∏ i, m i (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [piPremeasure]
rcases (pi univ s).eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· rcases univ_pi_eq_empty_iff.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩
have : ∃ i, m i (s i) = 0 := ⟨i, by simp [hi]⟩
simpa [h, Finset.card_univ, zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero, @eq_comm _ (0 : ℝ≥0∞),
Finset.prod_eq_zero_iff, piPremeasure]
· simp [h, piPremeasure]
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi' MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi'
theorem piPremeasure_pi_mono {s t : Set (∀ i, α i)} (h : s ⊆ t) :
piPremeasure m s ≤ piPremeasure m t :=
Finset.prod_le_prod' fun _ _ => measure_mono (image_subset _ h)
#align measure_theory.pi_premeasure_pi_mono MeasureTheory.piPremeasure_pi_mono
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Pi.lean | 182 | 184 | theorem piPremeasure_pi_eval {s : Set (∀ i, α i)} :
piPremeasure m (pi univ fun i => eval i '' s) = piPremeasure m s := by |
simp only [eval, piPremeasure_pi']; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro, Martin Dvorak
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.join from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
/-!
# Join of a list of lists
This file proves basic properties of `List.join`, which concatenates a list of lists. It is defined
in `Init.Data.List.Basic`.
-/
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
attribute [simp] join
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem join_singleton (l : List α) : [l].join = l := by rw [join, join, append_nil]
#align list.join_singleton List.join_singleton
@[simp]
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] => iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| l :: L => by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
#align list.join_eq_nil List.join_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : List (List α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ := by
induction L₁
· rfl
· simp [*]
#align list.join_append List.join_append
theorem join_concat (L : List (List α)) (l : List α) : join (L.concat l) = join L ++ l := by simp
#align list.join_concat List.join_concat
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_not_isEmpty :
∀ {L : List (List α)}, join (L.filter fun l => !l.isEmpty) = L.join
| [] => rfl
| [] :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L), isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
| (a :: l) :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L)]
#align list.join_filter_empty_eq_ff List.join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-25")] alias join_filter_isEmpty_eq_false := join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_ne_nil [DecidablePred fun l : List α => l ≠ []] {L : List (List α)} :
join (L.filter fun l => l ≠ []) = L.join := by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty, ← isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
#align list.join_filter_ne_nil List.join_filter_ne_nil
theorem join_join (l : List (List (List α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.join_join List.join_join
/-- See `List.length_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma length_join' (L : List (List α)) : length (join L) = Nat.sum (map length L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, Nat.sum_cons, length_append]]
/-- See `List.countP_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma countP_join' (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L : List (List α), countP p L.join = Nat.sum (L.map (countP p))
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by rw [join, countP_append, map_cons, Nat.sum_cons, countP_join' _ l]
/-- See `List.count_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma count_join' [BEq α] (L : List (List α)) (a : α) :
L.join.count a = Nat.sum (L.map (count a)) := countP_join' _ _
/-- See `List.length_bind` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma length_bind' (l : List α) (f : α → List β) :
length (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (length ∘ f) l) := by rw [List.bind, length_join', map_map]
/-- See `List.countP_bind` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma countP_bind' (p : β → Bool) (l : List α) (f : α → List β) :
countP p (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (countP p ∘ f) l) := by rw [List.bind, countP_join', map_map]
/-- See `List.count_bind` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
lemma count_bind' [BEq β] (l : List α) (f : α → List β) (x : β) :
count x (l.bind f) = Nat.sum (map (count x ∘ f) l) := countP_bind' _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_nil {l : List α} {f : α → List β} : List.bind l f = [] ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = [] :=
join_eq_nil.trans <| by
simp only [mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
#align list.bind_eq_nil List.bind_eq_nil
/-- In a join, taking the first elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join of the first `i` sublists.
See `List.take_sum_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
theorem take_sum_join' (L : List (List α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.take (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) = (L.take i).join := by
induction L generalizing i
· simp
· cases i <;> simp [take_append, *]
/-- In a join, dropping all the elements up to an index which is the sum of the lengths of the
first `i` sublists, is the same as taking the join after dropping the first `i` sublists.
See `List.drop_sum_join` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
theorem drop_sum_join' (L : List (List α)) (i : ℕ) :
L.join.drop (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) = (L.drop i).join := by
induction L generalizing i
· simp
· cases i <;> simp [drop_append, *]
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
theorem drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get (L : List α) (i : Fin L.length) :
(L.take (i + 1)).drop i = [get L i] := by
induction' L with head tail ih
· exact (Nat.not_succ_le_zero i i.isLt).elim
rcases i with ⟨_ | i, hi⟩
· simp
· simpa using ih ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi⟩
set_option linter.deprecated false in
/-- Taking only the first `i+1` elements in a list, and then dropping the first `i` ones, one is
left with a list of length `1` made of the `i`-th element of the original list. -/
@[deprecated drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get (since := "2023-01-10")]
theorem drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nthLe (L : List α) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < L.length) :
(L.take (i + 1)).drop i = [nthLe L i hi] := by
induction' L with head tail generalizing i
· simp only [length] at hi
exact (Nat.not_succ_le_zero i hi).elim
cases' i with i hi
· simp
rfl
have : i < tail.length := by simpa using hi
simp [*]
rfl
#align list.drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nth_le List.drop_take_succ_eq_cons_nthLe
/-- In a join of sublists, taking the slice between the indices `A` and `B - 1` gives back the
original sublist of index `i` if `A` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `< i`, and
`B` is the sum of the lengths of sublists of index `≤ i`.
See `List.drop_take_succ_join_eq_get` for the corresponding statement using `List.sum`. -/
theorem drop_take_succ_join_eq_get' (L : List (List α)) (i : Fin L.length) :
(L.join.take (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take (i + 1)))).drop (Nat.sum ((L.map length).take i)) =
get L i := by
have : (L.map length).take i = ((L.take (i + 1)).map length).take i := by
simp [map_take, take_take, Nat.min_eq_left]
simp only [this, length_map, take_sum_join', drop_sum_join', drop_take_succ_eq_cons_get,
join, append_nil]
#noalign list.drop_take_succ_join_eq_nth_le
#noalign list.sum_take_map_length_lt1
#noalign list.sum_take_map_length_lt2
#noalign list.nth_le_join
/-- Two lists of sublists are equal iff their joins coincide, as well as the lengths of the
sublists. -/
| Mathlib/Data/List/Join.lean | 168 | 176 | theorem eq_iff_join_eq (L L' : List (List α)) :
L = L' ↔ L.join = L'.join ∧ map length L = map length L' := by |
refine ⟨fun H => by simp [H], ?_⟩
rintro ⟨join_eq, length_eq⟩
apply ext_get
· have : length (map length L) = length (map length L') := by rw [length_eq]
simpa using this
· intro n h₁ h₂
rw [← drop_take_succ_join_eq_get', ← drop_take_succ_join_eq_get', join_eq, length_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kevin Buzzard, Ines Wright, Joachim Breitner
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Solvable
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.PGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Sylow
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import group_theory.nilpotent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2bbc7e3884ba234309d2a43b19144105a753292e"
/-!
# Nilpotent groups
An API for nilpotent groups, that is, groups for which the upper central series
reaches `⊤`.
## Main definitions
Recall that if `H K : Subgroup G` then `⁅H, K⁆ : Subgroup G` is the subgroup of `G` generated
by the commutators `hkh⁻¹k⁻¹`. Recall also Lean's conventions that `⊤` denotes the
subgroup `G` of `G`, and `⊥` denotes the trivial subgroup `{1}`.
* `upperCentralSeries G : ℕ → Subgroup G` : the upper central series of a group `G`.
This is an increasing sequence of normal subgroups `H n` of `G` with `H 0 = ⊥` and
`H (n + 1) / H n` is the centre of `G / H n`.
* `lowerCentralSeries G : ℕ → Subgroup G` : the lower central series of a group `G`.
This is a decreasing sequence of normal subgroups `H n` of `G` with `H 0 = ⊤` and
`H (n + 1) = ⁅H n, G⁆`.
* `IsNilpotent` : A group G is nilpotent if its upper central series reaches `⊤`, or
equivalently if its lower central series reaches `⊥`.
* `nilpotency_class` : the length of the upper central series of a nilpotent group.
* `IsAscendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop` and
* `IsDescendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop` : Note that in the literature
a "central series" for a group is usually defined to be a *finite* sequence of normal subgroups
`H 0`, `H 1`, ..., starting at `⊤`, finishing at `⊥`, and with each `H n / H (n + 1)`
central in `G / H (n + 1)`. In this formalisation it is convenient to have two weaker predicates
on an infinite sequence of subgroups `H n` of `G`: we say a sequence is a *descending central
series* if it starts at `G` and `⁅H n, ⊤⁆ ⊆ H (n + 1)` for all `n`. Note that this series
may not terminate at `⊥`, and the `H i` need not be normal. Similarly a sequence is an
*ascending central series* if `H 0 = ⊥` and `⁅H (n + 1), ⊤⁆ ⊆ H n` for all `n`, again with no
requirement that the series reaches `⊤` or that the `H i` are normal.
## Main theorems
`G` is *defined* to be nilpotent if the upper central series reaches `⊤`.
* `nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series` : `G` is nilpotent iff some ascending central
series reaches `⊤`.
* `nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series` : `G` is nilpotent iff some descending central
series reaches `⊥`.
* `nilpotent_iff_lower` : `G` is nilpotent iff the lower central series reaches `⊥`.
* The `nilpotency_class` can likewise be obtained from these equivalent
definitions, see `least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass`,
`least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass` and
`lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass`.
* If `G` is nilpotent, then so are its subgroups, images, quotients and preimages.
Binary and finite products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent.
Infinite products are nilpotent if their nilpotent class is bounded.
Corresponding lemmas about the `nilpotency_class` are provided.
* The `nilpotency_class` of `G ⧸ center G` is given explicitly, and an induction principle
is derived from that.
* `IsNilpotent.to_isSolvable`: If `G` is nilpotent, it is solvable.
## Warning
A "central series" is usually defined to be a finite sequence of normal subgroups going
from `⊥` to `⊤` with the property that each subquotient is contained within the centre of
the associated quotient of `G`. This means that if `G` is not nilpotent, then
none of what we have called `upperCentralSeries G`, `lowerCentralSeries G` or
the sequences satisfying `IsAscendingCentralSeries` or `IsDescendingCentralSeries`
are actually central series. Note that the fact that the upper and lower central series
are not central series if `G` is not nilpotent is a standard abuse of notation.
-/
open Subgroup
section WithGroup
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) [Normal H]
/-- If `H` is a normal subgroup of `G`, then the set `{x : G | ∀ y : G, x*y*x⁻¹*y⁻¹ ∈ H}`
is a subgroup of `G` (because it is the preimage in `G` of the centre of the
quotient group `G/H`.)
-/
def upperCentralSeriesStep : Subgroup G where
carrier := { x : G | ∀ y : G, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H }
one_mem' y := by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]
mul_mem' {a b ha hb y} := by
convert Subgroup.mul_mem _ (ha (b * y * b⁻¹)) (hb y) using 1
group
inv_mem' {x hx y} := by
specialize hx y⁻¹
rw [mul_assoc, inv_inv] at hx ⊢
exact Subgroup.Normal.mem_comm inferInstance hx
#align upper_central_series_step upperCentralSeriesStep
theorem mem_upperCentralSeriesStep (x : G) :
x ∈ upperCentralSeriesStep H ↔ ∀ y, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ H := Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_central_series_step mem_upperCentralSeriesStep
open QuotientGroup
/-- The proof that `upperCentralSeriesStep H` is the preimage of the centre of `G/H` under
the canonical surjection. -/
theorem upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center :
upperCentralSeriesStep H = Subgroup.comap (mk' H) (center (G ⧸ H)) := by
ext
rw [mem_comap, mem_center_iff, forall_mk]
apply forall_congr'
intro y
rw [coe_mk', ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, ← QuotientGroup.mk_mul, eq_comm, eq_iff_div_mem,
div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv_rev, mul_assoc]
#align upper_central_series_step_eq_comap_center upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center
instance : Normal (upperCentralSeriesStep H) := by
rw [upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center]
infer_instance
variable (G)
/-- An auxiliary type-theoretic definition defining both the upper central series of
a group, and a proof that it is normal, all in one go. -/
def upperCentralSeriesAux : ℕ → Σ'H : Subgroup G, Normal H
| 0 => ⟨⊥, inferInstance⟩
| n + 1 =>
let un := upperCentralSeriesAux n
let _un_normal := un.2
⟨upperCentralSeriesStep un.1, inferInstance⟩
#align upper_central_series_aux upperCentralSeriesAux
/-- `upperCentralSeries G n` is the `n`th term in the upper central series of `G`. -/
def upperCentralSeries (n : ℕ) : Subgroup G :=
(upperCentralSeriesAux G n).1
#align upper_central_series upperCentralSeries
instance upperCentralSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : Normal (upperCentralSeries G n) :=
(upperCentralSeriesAux G n).2
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_zero : upperCentralSeries G 0 = ⊥ := rfl
#align upper_central_series_zero upperCentralSeries_zero
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_one : upperCentralSeries G 1 = center G := by
ext
simp only [upperCentralSeries, upperCentralSeriesAux, upperCentralSeriesStep,
Subgroup.mem_center_iff, mem_mk, mem_bot, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact forall_congr' fun y => by rw [mul_inv_eq_one, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, eq_comm]
#align upper_central_series_one upperCentralSeries_one
/-- The `n+1`st term of the upper central series `H i` has underlying set equal to the `x` such
that `⁅x,G⁆ ⊆ H n`-/
theorem mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff (n : ℕ) (x : G) :
x ∈ upperCentralSeries G (n + 1) ↔ ∀ y : G, x * y * x⁻¹ * y⁻¹ ∈ upperCentralSeries G n :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_upper_central_series_succ_iff mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff
-- is_nilpotent is already defined in the root namespace (for elements of rings).
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent if its upper central series is eventually `G`. -/
class Group.IsNilpotent (G : Type*) [Group G] : Prop where
nilpotent' : ∃ n : ℕ, upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤
#align group.is_nilpotent Group.IsNilpotent
-- Porting note: add lemma since infer kinds are unsupported in the definition of `IsNilpotent`
lemma Group.IsNilpotent.nilpotent (G : Type*) [Group G] [IsNilpotent G] :
∃ n : ℕ, upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤ := Group.IsNilpotent.nilpotent'
open Group
variable {G}
/-- A sequence of subgroups of `G` is an ascending central series if `H 0` is trivial and
`⁅H (n + 1), G⁆ ⊆ H n` for all `n`. Note that we do not require that `H n = G` for some `n`. -/
def IsAscendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) : Prop :=
H 0 = ⊥ ∧ ∀ (x : G) (n : ℕ), x ∈ H (n + 1) → ∀ g, x * g * x⁻¹ * g⁻¹ ∈ H n
#align is_ascending_central_series IsAscendingCentralSeries
/-- A sequence of subgroups of `G` is a descending central series if `H 0` is `G` and
`⁅H n, G⁆ ⊆ H (n + 1)` for all `n`. Note that we do not require that `H n = {1}` for some `n`. -/
def IsDescendingCentralSeries (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) :=
H 0 = ⊤ ∧ ∀ (x : G) (n : ℕ), x ∈ H n → ∀ g, x * g * x⁻¹ * g⁻¹ ∈ H (n + 1)
#align is_descending_central_series IsDescendingCentralSeries
/-- Any ascending central series for a group is bounded above by the upper central series. -/
theorem ascending_central_series_le_upper (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) (hH : IsAscendingCentralSeries H) :
∀ n : ℕ, H n ≤ upperCentralSeries G n
| 0 => hH.1.symm ▸ le_refl ⊥
| n + 1 => by
intro x hx
rw [mem_upperCentralSeries_succ_iff]
exact fun y => ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n (hH.2 x n hx y)
#align ascending_central_series_le_upper ascending_central_series_le_upper
variable (G)
/-- The upper central series of a group is an ascending central series. -/
theorem upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries :
IsAscendingCentralSeries (upperCentralSeries G) :=
⟨rfl, fun _x _n h => h⟩
#align upper_central_series_is_ascending_central_series upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries
theorem upperCentralSeries_mono : Monotone (upperCentralSeries G) := by
refine monotone_nat_of_le_succ ?_
intro n x hx y
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc y x⁻¹ y⁻¹]
exact mul_mem hx (Normal.conj_mem (upperCentralSeries_normal G n) x⁻¹ (inv_mem hx) y)
#align upper_central_series_mono upperCentralSeries_mono
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent iff there exists an ascending central series which reaches `G` in
finitely many steps. -/
theorem nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series :
IsNilpotent G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ∃ H : ℕ → Subgroup G, IsAscendingCentralSeries H ∧ H n = ⊤ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, nH⟩
exact ⟨_, _, upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries G, nH⟩
· rintro ⟨n, H, hH, hn⟩
use n
rw [eq_top_iff, ← hn]
exact ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n
#align nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series
theorem is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending {H : ℕ → Subgroup G} {n : ℕ} (hn : H n = ⊤)
(hasc : IsAscendingCentralSeries H) : IsDescendingCentralSeries fun m : ℕ => H (n - m) := by
cases' hasc with h0 hH
refine ⟨hn, fun x m hx g => ?_⟩
dsimp at hx
by_cases hm : n ≤ m
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_of_le hm, h0, Subgroup.mem_bot] at hx
subst hx
rw [show (1 : G) * g * (1⁻¹ : G) * g⁻¹ = 1 by group]
exact Subgroup.one_mem _
· push_neg at hm
apply hH
convert hx using 1
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hm), Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
#align is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending
theorem is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending {H : ℕ → Subgroup G} {n : ℕ} (hn : H n = ⊥)
(hdesc : IsDescendingCentralSeries H) : IsAscendingCentralSeries fun m : ℕ => H (n - m) := by
cases' hdesc with h0 hH
refine ⟨hn, fun x m hx g => ?_⟩
dsimp only at hx ⊢
by_cases hm : n ≤ m
· have hnm : n - m = 0 := tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hm
rw [hnm, h0]
exact mem_top _
· push_neg at hm
convert hH x _ hx g using 1
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hm), Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
#align is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending
/-- A group `G` is nilpotent iff there exists a descending central series which reaches the
trivial group in a finite time. -/
theorem nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series :
IsNilpotent G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, ∃ H : ℕ → Subgroup G, IsDescendingCentralSeries H ∧ H n = ⊥ := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, H, hH, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun m => H (n - m), is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
· rintro ⟨n, H, hH, hn⟩
refine ⟨n, fun m => H (n - m), is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
#align nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series
/-- The lower central series of a group `G` is a sequence `H n` of subgroups of `G`, defined
by `H 0` is all of `G` and for `n≥1`, `H (n + 1) = ⁅H n, G⁆` -/
def lowerCentralSeries (G : Type*) [Group G] : ℕ → Subgroup G
| 0 => ⊤
| n + 1 => ⁅lowerCentralSeries G n, ⊤⁆
#align lower_central_series lowerCentralSeries
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_zero : lowerCentralSeries G 0 = ⊤ := rfl
#align lower_central_series_zero lowerCentralSeries_zero
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_one : lowerCentralSeries G 1 = commutator G := rfl
#align lower_central_series_one lowerCentralSeries_one
theorem mem_lowerCentralSeries_succ_iff (n : ℕ) (q : G) :
q ∈ lowerCentralSeries G (n + 1) ↔
q ∈ closure { x | ∃ p ∈ lowerCentralSeries G n,
∃ q ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x } := Iff.rfl
#align mem_lower_central_series_succ_iff mem_lowerCentralSeries_succ_iff
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ (n : ℕ) :
lowerCentralSeries G (n + 1) =
closure { x | ∃ p ∈ lowerCentralSeries G n, ∃ q ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G), p * q * p⁻¹ * q⁻¹ = x } :=
rfl
#align lower_central_series_succ lowerCentralSeries_succ
instance lowerCentralSeries_normal (n : ℕ) : Normal (lowerCentralSeries G n) := by
induction' n with d hd
· exact (⊤ : Subgroup G).normal_of_characteristic
· exact @Subgroup.commutator_normal _ _ (lowerCentralSeries G d) ⊤ hd _
theorem lowerCentralSeries_antitone : Antitone (lowerCentralSeries G) := by
refine antitone_nat_of_succ_le fun n x hx => ?_
simp only [mem_lowerCentralSeries_succ_iff, exists_prop, mem_top, exists_true_left,
true_and_iff] at hx
refine
closure_induction hx ?_ (Subgroup.one_mem _) (@Subgroup.mul_mem _ _ _) (@Subgroup.inv_mem _ _ _)
rintro y ⟨z, hz, a, ha⟩
rw [← ha, mul_assoc, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc a z⁻¹ a⁻¹]
exact mul_mem hz (Normal.conj_mem (lowerCentralSeries_normal n) z⁻¹ (inv_mem hz) a)
#align lower_central_series_antitone lowerCentralSeries_antitone
/-- The lower central series of a group is a descending central series. -/
theorem lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries :
IsDescendingCentralSeries (lowerCentralSeries G) := by
constructor
· rfl
intro x n hxn g
exact commutator_mem_commutator hxn (mem_top g)
#align lower_central_series_is_descending_central_series lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries
/-- Any descending central series for a group is bounded below by the lower central series. -/
theorem descending_central_series_ge_lower (H : ℕ → Subgroup G) (hH : IsDescendingCentralSeries H) :
∀ n : ℕ, lowerCentralSeries G n ≤ H n
| 0 => hH.1.symm ▸ le_refl ⊤
| n + 1 => commutator_le.mpr fun x hx q _ =>
hH.2 x n (descending_central_series_ge_lower H hH n hx) q
#align descending_central_series_ge_lower descending_central_series_ge_lower
/-- A group is nilpotent if and only if its lower central series eventually reaches
the trivial subgroup. -/
theorem nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries : IsNilpotent G ↔ ∃ n, lowerCentralSeries G n = ⊥ := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, H, ⟨h0, hs⟩, hn⟩
use n
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← hn]
exact descending_central_series_ge_lower H ⟨h0, hs⟩ n
· rintro ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, lowerCentralSeries G, lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries, hn⟩
#align nilpotent_iff_lower_central_series nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries
section Classical
open scoped Classical
variable [hG : IsNilpotent G]
variable (G)
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent group is the smallest natural `n` such that
the `n`'th term of the upper central series is `G`. -/
noncomputable def Group.nilpotencyClass : ℕ := Nat.find (IsNilpotent.nilpotent G)
#align group.nilpotency_class Group.nilpotencyClass
variable {G}
@[simp]
theorem upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass : upperCentralSeries G (Group.nilpotencyClass G) = ⊤ :=
Nat.find_spec (IsNilpotent.nilpotent G)
#align upper_central_series_nilpotency_class upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass
theorem upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le {n : ℕ} :
upperCentralSeries G n = ⊤ ↔ Group.nilpotencyClass G ≤ n := by
constructor
· intro h
exact Nat.find_le h
· intro h
rw [eq_top_iff, ← upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass]
exact upperCentralSeries_mono _ h
#align upper_central_series_eq_top_iff_nilpotency_class_le upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent `G` is equal to the smallest `n` for which an ascending
central series reaches `G` in its `n`'th term. -/
theorem least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass :
Nat.find ((nilpotent_iff_finite_ascending_central_series G).mp hG) =
Group.nilpotencyClass G := by
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_mono ?_) (Nat.find_mono ?_)
· intro n hn
exact ⟨upperCentralSeries G, upperCentralSeries_isAscendingCentralSeries G, hn⟩
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
rw [← top_le_iff, ← hn]
exact ascending_central_series_le_upper H hH n
#align least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotency_class least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent `G` is equal to the smallest `n` for which the descending
central series reaches `⊥` in its `n`'th term. -/
theorem least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass :
Nat.find ((nilpotent_iff_finite_descending_central_series G).mp hG) =
Group.nilpotencyClass G := by
rw [← least_ascending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_mono ?_) (Nat.find_mono ?_)
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
refine ⟨fun m => H (n - m), is_decending_rev_series_of_is_ascending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
refine ⟨fun m => H (n - m), is_ascending_rev_series_of_is_descending G hn hH, ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [tsub_self]
exact hH.1
#align least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotency_class least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass
/-- The nilpotency class of a nilpotent `G` is equal to the length of the lower central series. -/
theorem lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass :
Nat.find (nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries.mp hG) = Group.nilpotencyClass (G := G) := by
rw [← least_descending_central_series_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_mono ?_) (Nat.find_mono ?_)
· rintro n ⟨H, ⟨hH, hn⟩⟩
rw [← le_bot_iff, ← hn]
exact descending_central_series_ge_lower H hH n
· rintro n h
exact ⟨lowerCentralSeries G, ⟨lowerCentralSeries_isDescendingCentralSeries, h⟩⟩
#align lower_central_series_length_eq_nilpotency_class lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass
@[simp]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass :
lowerCentralSeries G (Group.nilpotencyClass G) = ⊥ := by
rw [← lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
exact Nat.find_spec (nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries.mp hG)
#align lower_central_series_nilpotency_class lowerCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass
theorem lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le {n : ℕ} :
lowerCentralSeries G n = ⊥ ↔ Group.nilpotencyClass G ≤ n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
exact Nat.find_le h
· intro h
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← lowerCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass]
exact lowerCentralSeries_antitone h
#align lower_central_series_eq_bot_iff_nilpotency_class_le lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le
end Classical
theorem lowerCentralSeries_map_subtype_le (H : Subgroup G) (n : ℕ) :
(lowerCentralSeries H n).map H.subtype ≤ lowerCentralSeries G n := by
induction' n with d hd
· simp
· rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, lowerCentralSeries_succ, MonoidHom.map_closure]
apply Subgroup.closure_mono
rintro x1 ⟨x2, ⟨x3, hx3, x4, _hx4, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x3, hd (mem_map.mpr ⟨x3, hx3, rfl⟩), x4, by simp⟩
#align lower_central_series_map_subtype_le lowerCentralSeries_map_subtype_le
/-- A subgroup of a nilpotent group is nilpotent -/
instance Subgroup.isNilpotent (H : Subgroup G) [hG : IsNilpotent G] : IsNilpotent H := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries] at *
rcases hG with ⟨n, hG⟩
use n
have := lowerCentralSeries_map_subtype_le H n
simp only [hG, SetLike.le_def, mem_map, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp] at this
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx => Subtype.ext (this x ⟨hx, rfl⟩)
#align subgroup.is_nilpotent Subgroup.isNilpotent
/-- The nilpotency class of a subgroup is less or equal to the nilpotency class of the group -/
theorem Subgroup.nilpotencyClass_le (H : Subgroup G) [hG : IsNilpotent G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass H ≤ Group.nilpotencyClass G := by
repeat rw [← lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
--- Porting note: Lean needs to be told that predicates are decidable
refine @Nat.find_mono _ _ (Classical.decPred _) (Classical.decPred _) ?_ _ _
intro n hG
have := lowerCentralSeries_map_subtype_le H n
simp only [hG, SetLike.le_def, mem_map, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, exists_imp] at this
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx => Subtype.ext (this x ⟨hx, rfl⟩)
#align subgroup.nilpotency_class_le Subgroup.nilpotencyClass_le
instance (priority := 100) Group.isNilpotent_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton G] : IsNilpotent G :=
nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries.2 ⟨0, Subsingleton.elim ⊤ ⊥⟩
#align is_nilpotent_of_subsingleton Group.isNilpotent_of_subsingleton
theorem upperCentralSeries.map {H : Type*} [Group H] {f : G →* H} (h : Function.Surjective f)
(n : ℕ) : Subgroup.map f (upperCentralSeries G n) ≤ upperCentralSeries H n := by
induction' n with d hd
· simp
· rintro _ ⟨x, hx : x ∈ upperCentralSeries G d.succ, rfl⟩ y'
rcases h y' with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa using hd (mem_map_of_mem f (hx y))
#align upper_central_series.map upperCentralSeries.map
theorem lowerCentralSeries.map {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G →* H) (n : ℕ) :
Subgroup.map f (lowerCentralSeries G n) ≤ lowerCentralSeries H n := by
induction' n with d hd
· simp [Nat.zero_eq]
· rintro a ⟨x, hx : x ∈ lowerCentralSeries G d.succ, rfl⟩
refine closure_induction hx ?_ (by simp [f.map_one, Subgroup.one_mem _])
(fun y z hy hz => by simp [MonoidHom.map_mul, Subgroup.mul_mem _ hy hz]) (fun y hy => by
rw [f.map_inv]; exact Subgroup.inv_mem _ hy)
rintro a ⟨y, hy, z, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
apply mem_closure.mpr
exact fun K hK => hK ⟨f y, hd (mem_map_of_mem f hy), by simp [commutatorElement_def]⟩
#align lower_central_series.map lowerCentralSeries.map
theorem lowerCentralSeries_succ_eq_bot {n : ℕ} (h : lowerCentralSeries G n ≤ center G) :
lowerCentralSeries G (n + 1) = ⊥ := by
rw [lowerCentralSeries_succ, closure_eq_bot_iff, Set.subset_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy1, z, ⟨⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, ← mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_eq_one, eq_comm]
exact mem_center_iff.mp (h hy1) z
#align lower_central_series_succ_eq_bot lowerCentralSeries_succ_eq_bot
/-- The preimage of a nilpotent group is nilpotent if the kernel of the homomorphism is contained
in the center -/
theorem isNilpotent_of_ker_le_center {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G →* H) (hf1 : f.ker ≤ center G)
(hH : IsNilpotent H) : IsNilpotent G := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries] at *
rcases hH with ⟨n, hn⟩
use n + 1
refine lowerCentralSeries_succ_eq_bot (le_trans ((Subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff _).mp ?_) hf1)
exact eq_bot_iff.mpr (hn ▸ lowerCentralSeries.map f n)
#align is_nilpotent_of_ker_le_center isNilpotent_of_ker_le_center
theorem nilpotencyClass_le_of_ker_le_center {H : Type*} [Group H] (f : G →* H)
(hf1 : f.ker ≤ center G) (hH : IsNilpotent H) :
Group.nilpotencyClass (hG := isNilpotent_of_ker_le_center f hf1 hH) ≤
Group.nilpotencyClass H + 1 := by
haveI : IsNilpotent G := isNilpotent_of_ker_le_center f hf1 hH
rw [← lowerCentralSeries_length_eq_nilpotencyClass]
-- Porting note: Lean needs to be told that predicates are decidable
refine @Nat.find_min' _ (Classical.decPred _) _ _ ?_
refine lowerCentralSeries_succ_eq_bot (le_trans ((Subgroup.map_eq_bot_iff _).mp ?_) hf1)
rw [eq_bot_iff]
apply le_trans (lowerCentralSeries.map f _)
simp only [lowerCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass, le_bot_iff]
#align nilpotency_class_le_of_ker_le_center nilpotencyClass_le_of_ker_le_center
/-- The range of a surjective homomorphism from a nilpotent group is nilpotent -/
theorem nilpotent_of_surjective {G' : Type*} [Group G'] [h : IsNilpotent G] (f : G →* G')
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : IsNilpotent G' := by
rcases h with ⟨n, hn⟩
use n
apply eq_top_iff.mpr
calc
⊤ = f.range := symm (f.range_top_of_surjective hf)
_ = Subgroup.map f ⊤ := MonoidHom.range_eq_map _
_ = Subgroup.map f (upperCentralSeries G n) := by rw [hn]
_ ≤ upperCentralSeries G' n := upperCentralSeries.map hf n
#align nilpotent_of_surjective nilpotent_of_surjective
/-- The nilpotency class of the range of a surjective homomorphism from a
nilpotent group is less or equal the nilpotency class of the domain -/
theorem nilpotencyClass_le_of_surjective {G' : Type*} [Group G'] (f : G →* G')
(hf : Function.Surjective f) [h : IsNilpotent G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass (hG := nilpotent_of_surjective _ hf) ≤ Group.nilpotencyClass G := by
-- Porting note: Lean needs to be told that predicates are decidable
refine @Nat.find_mono _ _ (Classical.decPred _) (Classical.decPred _) ?_ _ _
intro n hn
rw [eq_top_iff]
calc
⊤ = f.range := symm (f.range_top_of_surjective hf)
_ = Subgroup.map f ⊤ := MonoidHom.range_eq_map _
_ = Subgroup.map f (upperCentralSeries G n) := by rw [hn]
_ ≤ upperCentralSeries G' n := upperCentralSeries.map hf n
#align nilpotency_class_le_of_surjective nilpotencyClass_le_of_surjective
/-- Nilpotency respects isomorphisms -/
theorem nilpotent_of_mulEquiv {G' : Type*} [Group G'] [_h : IsNilpotent G] (f : G ≃* G') :
IsNilpotent G' :=
nilpotent_of_surjective f.toMonoidHom (MulEquiv.surjective f)
#align nilpotent_of_mul_equiv nilpotent_of_mulEquiv
/-- A quotient of a nilpotent group is nilpotent -/
instance nilpotent_quotient_of_nilpotent (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] [_h : IsNilpotent G] :
IsNilpotent (G ⧸ H) :=
nilpotent_of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk' H) QuotientGroup.mk_surjective
#align nilpotent_quotient_of_nilpotent nilpotent_quotient_of_nilpotent
/-- The nilpotency class of a quotient of `G` is less or equal the nilpotency class of `G` -/
theorem nilpotencyClass_quotient_le (H : Subgroup G) [H.Normal] [_h : IsNilpotent G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass (G ⧸ H) ≤ Group.nilpotencyClass G :=
nilpotencyClass_le_of_surjective (QuotientGroup.mk' H) QuotientGroup.mk_surjective
#align nilpotency_class_quotient_le nilpotencyClass_quotient_le
-- This technical lemma helps with rewriting the subgroup, which occurs in indices
private theorem comap_center_subst {H₁ H₂ : Subgroup G} [Normal H₁] [Normal H₂] (h : H₁ = H₂) :
comap (mk' H₁) (center (G ⧸ H₁)) = comap (mk' H₂) (center (G ⧸ H₂)) := by subst h; rfl
theorem comap_upperCentralSeries_quotient_center (n : ℕ) :
comap (mk' (center G)) (upperCentralSeries (G ⧸ center G) n) = upperCentralSeries G n.succ := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, upperCentralSeries_zero, MonoidHom.comap_bot, ker_mk',
(upperCentralSeries_one G).symm]
· let Hn := upperCentralSeries (G ⧸ center G) n
calc
comap (mk' (center G)) (upperCentralSeriesStep Hn) =
comap (mk' (center G)) (comap (mk' Hn) (center ((G ⧸ center G) ⧸ Hn))) := by
rw [upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center]
_ = comap (mk' (comap (mk' (center G)) Hn)) (center (G ⧸ comap (mk' (center G)) Hn)) :=
QuotientGroup.comap_comap_center
_ = comap (mk' (upperCentralSeries G n.succ)) (center (G ⧸ upperCentralSeries G n.succ)) :=
(comap_center_subst ih)
_ = upperCentralSeriesStep (upperCentralSeries G n.succ) :=
symm (upperCentralSeriesStep_eq_comap_center _)
#align comap_upper_central_series_quotient_center comap_upperCentralSeries_quotient_center
theorem nilpotencyClass_zero_iff_subsingleton [IsNilpotent G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass G = 0 ↔ Subsingleton G := by
-- Porting note: Lean needs to be told that predicates are decidable
rw [Group.nilpotencyClass, @Nat.find_eq_zero _ (Classical.decPred _), upperCentralSeries_zero,
subsingleton_iff_bot_eq_top, Subgroup.subsingleton_iff]
#align nilpotency_class_zero_iff_subsingleton nilpotencyClass_zero_iff_subsingleton
/-- Quotienting the `center G` reduces the nilpotency class by 1 -/
theorem nilpotencyClass_quotient_center [hH : IsNilpotent G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass (G ⧸ center G) = Group.nilpotencyClass G - 1 := by
generalize hn : Group.nilpotencyClass G = n
rcases n with (rfl | n)
· simp [nilpotencyClass_zero_iff_subsingleton] at *
exact Quotient.instSubsingletonQuotient (leftRel (center G))
· suffices Group.nilpotencyClass (G ⧸ center G) = n by simpa
apply le_antisymm
· apply upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le.mp
apply comap_injective (f := (mk' (center G))) (surjective_quot_mk _)
rw [comap_upperCentralSeries_quotient_center, comap_top, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, ← hn]
exact upperCentralSeries_nilpotencyClass
· apply le_of_add_le_add_right
calc
n + 1 = Group.nilpotencyClass G := hn.symm
_ ≤ Group.nilpotencyClass (G ⧸ center G) + 1 :=
nilpotencyClass_le_of_ker_le_center _ (le_of_eq (ker_mk' _)) _
#align nilpotency_class_quotient_center nilpotencyClass_quotient_center
/-- The nilpotency class of a non-trivial group is one more than its quotient by the center -/
theorem nilpotencyClass_eq_quotient_center_plus_one [hH : IsNilpotent G] [Nontrivial G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass G = Group.nilpotencyClass (G ⧸ center G) + 1 := by
rw [nilpotencyClass_quotient_center]
rcases h : Group.nilpotencyClass G with ⟨⟩
· exfalso
rw [nilpotencyClass_zero_iff_subsingleton] at h
apply false_of_nontrivial_of_subsingleton G
· simp
#align nilpotency_class_eq_quotient_center_plus_one nilpotencyClass_eq_quotient_center_plus_one
/-- If the quotient by `center G` is nilpotent, then so is G. -/
theorem of_quotient_center_nilpotent (h : IsNilpotent (G ⧸ center G)) : IsNilpotent G := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h.nilpotent
use n.succ
simp [← comap_upperCentralSeries_quotient_center, hn]
#align of_quotient_center_nilpotent of_quotient_center_nilpotent
/-- A custom induction principle for nilpotent groups. The base case is a trivial group
(`subsingleton G`), and in the induction step, one can assume the hypothesis for
the group quotiented by its center. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem nilpotent_center_quotient_ind {P : ∀ (G) [Group G] [IsNilpotent G], Prop}
(G : Type*) [Group G] [IsNilpotent G]
(hbase : ∀ (G) [Group G] [Subsingleton G], P G)
(hstep : ∀ (G) [Group G] [IsNilpotent G], P (G ⧸ center G) → P G) : P G := by
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ : ∃ n, Group.nilpotencyClass G = n := ⟨_, rfl⟩
induction' n with n ih generalizing G
· haveI := nilpotencyClass_zero_iff_subsingleton.mp h
exact hbase _
· have hn : Group.nilpotencyClass (G ⧸ center G) = n := by
simp [nilpotencyClass_quotient_center, h]
exact hstep _ (ih _ hn)
#align nilpotent_center_quotient_ind nilpotent_center_quotient_ind
theorem derived_le_lower_central (n : ℕ) : derivedSeries G n ≤ lowerCentralSeries G n := by
induction' n with i ih
· simp
· apply commutator_mono ih
simp
#align derived_le_lower_central derived_le_lower_central
/-- Abelian groups are nilpotent -/
instance (priority := 100) CommGroup.isNilpotent {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] : IsNilpotent G := by
use 1
rw [upperCentralSeries_one]
apply CommGroup.center_eq_top
#align comm_group.is_nilpotent CommGroup.isNilpotent
/-- Abelian groups have nilpotency class at most one -/
theorem CommGroup.nilpotencyClass_le_one {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] :
Group.nilpotencyClass G ≤ 1 := by
rw [← upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le, upperCentralSeries_one]
apply CommGroup.center_eq_top
#align comm_group.nilpotency_class_le_one CommGroup.nilpotencyClass_le_one
/-- Groups with nilpotency class at most one are abelian -/
def commGroupOfNilpotencyClass [IsNilpotent G] (h : Group.nilpotencyClass G ≤ 1) : CommGroup G :=
Group.commGroupOfCenterEqTop <| by
rw [← upperCentralSeries_one]
exact upperCentralSeries_eq_top_iff_nilpotencyClass_le.mpr h
#align comm_group_of_nilpotency_class commGroupOfNilpotencyClass
section Prod
variable {G₁ G₂ : Type*} [Group G₁] [Group G₂]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_prod (n : ℕ) :
lowerCentralSeries (G₁ × G₂) n = (lowerCentralSeries G₁ n).prod (lowerCentralSeries G₂ n) := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· calc
lowerCentralSeries (G₁ × G₂) n.succ = ⁅lowerCentralSeries (G₁ × G₂) n, ⊤⁆ := rfl
_ = ⁅(lowerCentralSeries G₁ n).prod (lowerCentralSeries G₂ n), ⊤⁆ := by rw [ih]
_ = ⁅(lowerCentralSeries G₁ n).prod (lowerCentralSeries G₂ n), (⊤ : Subgroup G₁).prod ⊤⁆ := by
simp
_ = ⁅lowerCentralSeries G₁ n, (⊤ : Subgroup G₁)⁆.prod ⁅lowerCentralSeries G₂ n, ⊤⁆ :=
(commutator_prod_prod _ _ _ _)
_ = (lowerCentralSeries G₁ n.succ).prod (lowerCentralSeries G₂ n.succ) := rfl
#align lower_central_series_prod lowerCentralSeries_prod
/-- Products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent -/
instance isNilpotent_prod [IsNilpotent G₁] [IsNilpotent G₂] : IsNilpotent (G₁ × G₂) := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries]
refine ⟨max (Group.nilpotencyClass G₁) (Group.nilpotencyClass G₂), ?_⟩
rw [lowerCentralSeries_prod,
lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le.mpr (le_max_left _ _),
lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le.mpr (le_max_right _ _), bot_prod_bot]
#align is_nilpotent_prod isNilpotent_prod
/-- The nilpotency class of a product is the max of the nilpotency classes of the factors -/
theorem nilpotencyClass_prod [IsNilpotent G₁] [IsNilpotent G₂] :
Group.nilpotencyClass (G₁ × G₂) =
max (Group.nilpotencyClass G₁) (Group.nilpotencyClass G₂) := by
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun k => ?_
simp only [max_le_iff, ← lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le,
lowerCentralSeries_prod, prod_eq_bot_iff]
#align nilpotency_class_prod nilpotencyClass_prod
end Prod
section BoundedPi
-- First the case of infinite products with bounded nilpotency class
variable {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Group (Gs i)]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_pi_le (n : ℕ) :
lowerCentralSeries (∀ i, Gs i) n ≤ Subgroup.pi Set.univ
fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n := by
let pi := fun f : ∀ i, Subgroup (Gs i) => Subgroup.pi Set.univ f
induction' n with n ih
· simp [pi_top]
· calc
lowerCentralSeries (∀ i, Gs i) n.succ = ⁅lowerCentralSeries (∀ i, Gs i) n, ⊤⁆ := rfl
_ ≤ ⁅pi fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n, ⊤⁆ := commutator_mono ih (le_refl _)
_ = ⁅pi fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n, pi fun i => ⊤⁆ := by simp [pi, pi_top]
_ ≤ pi fun i => ⁅lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n, ⊤⁆ := commutator_pi_pi_le _ _
_ = pi fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n.succ := rfl
#align lower_central_series_pi_le lowerCentralSeries_pi_le
/-- products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent if their nilpotency class is bounded -/
theorem isNilpotent_pi_of_bounded_class [∀ i, IsNilpotent (Gs i)] (n : ℕ)
(h : ∀ i, Group.nilpotencyClass (Gs i) ≤ n) : IsNilpotent (∀ i, Gs i) := by
rw [nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries]
refine ⟨n, ?_⟩
rw [eq_bot_iff]
apply le_trans (lowerCentralSeries_pi_le _)
rw [← eq_bot_iff, pi_eq_bot_iff]
intro i
apply lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le.mpr (h i)
#align is_nilpotent_pi_of_bounded_class isNilpotent_pi_of_bounded_class
end BoundedPi
section FinitePi
-- Now for finite products
variable {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Group (Gs i)]
theorem lowerCentralSeries_pi_of_finite [Finite η] (n : ℕ) :
lowerCentralSeries (∀ i, Gs i) n = Subgroup.pi Set.univ
fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n := by
let pi := fun f : ∀ i, Subgroup (Gs i) => Subgroup.pi Set.univ f
induction' n with n ih
· simp [pi_top]
· calc
lowerCentralSeries (∀ i, Gs i) n.succ = ⁅lowerCentralSeries (∀ i, Gs i) n, ⊤⁆ := rfl
_ = ⁅pi fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n, ⊤⁆ := by rw [ih]
_ = ⁅pi fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n, pi fun i => ⊤⁆ := by simp [pi, pi_top]
_ = pi fun i => ⁅lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n, ⊤⁆ := commutator_pi_pi_of_finite _ _
_ = pi fun i => lowerCentralSeries (Gs i) n.succ := rfl
#align lower_central_series_pi_of_finite lowerCentralSeries_pi_of_finite
/-- n-ary products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent -/
instance isNilpotent_pi [Finite η] [∀ i, IsNilpotent (Gs i)] : IsNilpotent (∀ i, Gs i) := by
cases nonempty_fintype η
rw [nilpotent_iff_lowerCentralSeries]
refine ⟨Finset.univ.sup fun i => Group.nilpotencyClass (Gs i), ?_⟩
rw [lowerCentralSeries_pi_of_finite, pi_eq_bot_iff]
intro i
rw [lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le]
exact Finset.le_sup (f := fun i => Group.nilpotencyClass (Gs i)) (Finset.mem_univ i)
#align is_nilpotent_pi isNilpotent_pi
/-- The nilpotency class of an n-ary product is the sup of the nilpotency classes of the factors -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Nilpotent.lean | 805 | 810 | theorem nilpotencyClass_pi [Fintype η] [∀ i, IsNilpotent (Gs i)] :
Group.nilpotencyClass (∀ i, Gs i) = Finset.univ.sup fun i => Group.nilpotencyClass (Gs i) := by |
apply eq_of_forall_ge_iff
intro k
simp only [Finset.sup_le_iff, ← lowerCentralSeries_eq_bot_iff_nilpotencyClass_le,
lowerCentralSeries_pi_of_finite, pi_eq_bot_iff, Finset.mem_univ, true_imp_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jannis Limperg. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jannis Limperg
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.list.indexes from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# Lemmas about List.*Idx functions.
Some specification lemmas for `List.mapIdx`, `List.mapIdxM`, `List.foldlIdx` and `List.foldrIdx`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
open Function
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
section MapIdx
-- Porting note: Add back old definition because it's easier for writing proofs.
/-- Lean3 `map_with_index` helper function -/
protected def oldMapIdxCore (f : ℕ → α → β) : ℕ → List α → List β
| _, [] => []
| k, a :: as => f k a :: List.oldMapIdxCore f (k + 1) as
/-- Given a function `f : ℕ → α → β` and `as : List α`, `as = [a₀, a₁, ...]`, returns the list
`[f 0 a₀, f 1 a₁, ...]`. -/
protected def oldMapIdx (f : ℕ → α → β) (as : List α) : List β :=
List.oldMapIdxCore f 0 as
@[simp]
theorem mapIdx_nil {α β} (f : ℕ → α → β) : mapIdx f [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.map_with_index_nil List.mapIdx_nil
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
protected theorem oldMapIdxCore_eq (l : List α) (f : ℕ → α → β) (n : ℕ) :
l.oldMapIdxCore f n = l.oldMapIdx fun i a ↦ f (i + n) a := by
induction' l with hd tl hl generalizing f n
· rfl
· rw [List.oldMapIdx]
simp only [List.oldMapIdxCore, hl, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_zero]
#noalign list.map_with_index_core_eq
-- Porting note: convert new definition to old definition.
-- A few new theorems are added to achieve this
-- 1. Prove that `oldMapIdxCore f (l ++ [e]) = oldMapIdxCore f l ++ [f l.length e]`
-- 2. Prove that `oldMapIdx f (l ++ [e]) = oldMapIdx f l ++ [f l.length e]`
-- 3. Prove list induction using `∀ l e, p [] → (p l → p (l ++ [e])) → p l`
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem.
| Mathlib/Data/List/Indexes.lean | 61 | 71 | theorem list_reverse_induction (p : List α → Prop) (base : p [])
(ind : ∀ (l : List α) (e : α), p l → p (l ++ [e])) : (∀ (l : List α), p l) := by |
let q := fun l ↦ p (reverse l)
have pq : ∀ l, p (reverse l) → q l := by simp only [q, reverse_reverse]; intro; exact id
have qp : ∀ l, q (reverse l) → p l := by simp only [q, reverse_reverse]; intro; exact id
intro l
apply qp
generalize (reverse l) = l
induction' l with head tail ih
· apply pq; simp only [reverse_nil, base]
· apply pq; simp only [reverse_cons]; apply ind; apply qp; rw [reverse_reverse]; exact ih
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.variables from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
#align mv_polynomial.degrees MvPolynomial.degrees
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_def MvPolynomial.degrees_def
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_monomial MvPolynomial.degrees_monomial
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_monomial_eq MvPolynomial.degrees_monomial_eq
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_C MvPolynomial.degrees_C
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_X' MvPolynomial.degrees_X'
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_X MvPolynomial.degrees_X
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_zero MvPolynomial.degrees_zero
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_one MvPolynomial.degrees_one
theorem degrees_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_add MvPolynomial.degrees_add
theorem degrees_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_sum MvPolynomial.degrees_sum
theorem degrees_mul (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_mul MvPolynomial.degrees_mul
theorem degrees_prod {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_prod MvPolynomial.degrees_prod
theorem degrees_pow (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod (Finset.range n) fun _ ↦ p
#align mv_polynomial.degrees_pow MvPolynomial.degrees_pow
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
#align mv_polynomial.mem_degrees MvPolynomial.mem_degrees
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 159 | 175 | theorem le_degrees_add {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p.degrees.Disjoint q.degrees) :
p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by |
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Lu-Ming Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Lu-Ming Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Kronecker
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.is_diag from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"55e2dfde0cff928ce5c70926a3f2c7dee3e2dd99"
/-!
# Diagonal matrices
This file contains the definition and basic results about diagonal matrices.
## Main results
- `Matrix.IsDiag`: a proposition that states a given square matrix `A` is diagonal.
## Tags
diag, diagonal, matrix
-/
namespace Matrix
variable {α β R n m : Type*}
open Function
open Matrix Kronecker
/-- `A.IsDiag` means square matrix `A` is a diagonal matrix. -/
def IsDiag [Zero α] (A : Matrix n n α) : Prop :=
Pairwise fun i j => A i j = 0
#align matrix.is_diag Matrix.IsDiag
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_diagonal [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] (d : n → α) : (diagonal d).IsDiag := fun _ _ =>
Matrix.diagonal_apply_ne _
#align matrix.is_diag_diagonal Matrix.isDiag_diagonal
/-- Diagonal matrices are generated by the `Matrix.diagonal` of their `Matrix.diag`. -/
theorem IsDiag.diagonal_diag [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsDiag) :
diagonal (diag A) = A :=
ext fun i j => by
obtain rfl | hij := Decidable.eq_or_ne i j
· rw [diagonal_apply_eq, diag]
· rw [diagonal_apply_ne _ hij, h hij]
#align matrix.is_diag.diagonal_diag Matrix.IsDiag.diagonal_diag
/-- `Matrix.IsDiag.diagonal_diag` as an iff. -/
theorem isDiag_iff_diagonal_diag [Zero α] [DecidableEq n] (A : Matrix n n α) :
A.IsDiag ↔ diagonal (diag A) = A :=
⟨IsDiag.diagonal_diag, fun hd => hd ▸ isDiag_diagonal (diag A)⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_iff_diagonal_diag Matrix.isDiag_iff_diagonal_diag
/-- Every matrix indexed by a subsingleton is diagonal. -/
theorem isDiag_of_subsingleton [Zero α] [Subsingleton n] (A : Matrix n n α) : A.IsDiag :=
fun i j h => (h <| Subsingleton.elim i j).elim
#align matrix.is_diag_of_subsingleton Matrix.isDiag_of_subsingleton
/-- Every zero matrix is diagonal. -/
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_zero [Zero α] : (0 : Matrix n n α).IsDiag := fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align matrix.is_diag_zero Matrix.isDiag_zero
/-- Every identity matrix is diagonal. -/
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_one [DecidableEq n] [Zero α] [One α] : (1 : Matrix n n α).IsDiag := fun _ _ =>
one_apply_ne
#align matrix.is_diag_one Matrix.isDiag_one
theorem IsDiag.map [Zero α] [Zero β] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) {f : α → β} (hf : f 0 = 0) :
(A.map f).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hf]
#align matrix.is_diag.map Matrix.IsDiag.map
theorem IsDiag.neg [AddGroup α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) : (-A).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h]
#align matrix.is_diag.neg Matrix.IsDiag.neg
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_neg_iff [AddGroup α] {A : Matrix n n α} : (-A).IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨fun ha _ _ h => neg_eq_zero.1 (ha h), IsDiag.neg⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_neg_iff Matrix.isDiag_neg_iff
theorem IsDiag.add [AddZeroClass α] {A B : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) (hb : B.IsDiag) :
(A + B).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hb h]
#align matrix.is_diag.add Matrix.IsDiag.add
theorem IsDiag.sub [AddGroup α] {A B : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) (hb : B.IsDiag) :
(A - B).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h, hb h]
#align matrix.is_diag.sub Matrix.IsDiag.sub
theorem IsDiag.smul [Monoid R] [AddMonoid α] [DistribMulAction R α] (k : R) {A : Matrix n n α}
(ha : A.IsDiag) : (k • A).IsDiag := by
intro i j h
simp [ha h]
#align matrix.is_diag.smul Matrix.IsDiag.smul
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_smul_one (n) [Semiring α] [DecidableEq n] (k : α) :
(k • (1 : Matrix n n α)).IsDiag :=
isDiag_one.smul k
#align matrix.is_diag_smul_one Matrix.isDiag_smul_one
theorem IsDiag.transpose [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) : Aᵀ.IsDiag := fun _ _ h =>
ha h.symm
#align matrix.is_diag.transpose Matrix.IsDiag.transpose
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_transpose_iff [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} : Aᵀ.IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨IsDiag.transpose, IsDiag.transpose⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_transpose_iff Matrix.isDiag_transpose_iff
theorem IsDiag.conjTranspose [Semiring α] [StarRing α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) :
Aᴴ.IsDiag :=
ha.transpose.map (star_zero _)
#align matrix.is_diag.conj_transpose Matrix.IsDiag.conjTranspose
@[simp]
theorem isDiag_conjTranspose_iff [Semiring α] [StarRing α] {A : Matrix n n α} :
Aᴴ.IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag :=
⟨fun ha => by
convert ha.conjTranspose
simp, IsDiag.conjTranspose⟩
#align matrix.is_diag_conj_transpose_iff Matrix.isDiag_conjTranspose_iff
theorem IsDiag.submatrix [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag) {f : m → n}
(hf : Injective f) : (A.submatrix f f).IsDiag := fun _ _ h => ha (hf.ne h)
#align matrix.is_diag.submatrix Matrix.IsDiag.submatrix
/-- `(A ⊗ B).IsDiag` if both `A` and `B` are diagonal. -/
theorem IsDiag.kronecker [MulZeroClass α] {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix n n α} (hA : A.IsDiag)
(hB : B.IsDiag) : (A ⊗ₖ B).IsDiag := by
rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨c, d⟩ h
simp only [Prod.mk.inj_iff, Ne, not_and_or] at h
cases' h with hac hbd
· simp [hA hac]
· simp [hB hbd]
#align matrix.is_diag.kronecker Matrix.IsDiag.kronecker
theorem IsDiag.isSymm [Zero α] {A : Matrix n n α} (h : A.IsDiag) : A.IsSymm := by
ext i j
by_cases g : i = j; · rw [g, transpose_apply]
simp [h g, h (Ne.symm g)]
#align matrix.is_diag.is_symm Matrix.IsDiag.isSymm
/-- The block matrix `A.fromBlocks 0 0 D` is diagonal if `A` and `D` are diagonal. -/
theorem IsDiag.fromBlocks [Zero α] {A : Matrix m m α} {D : Matrix n n α} (ha : A.IsDiag)
(hd : D.IsDiag) : (A.fromBlocks 0 0 D).IsDiag := by
rintro (i | i) (j | j) hij
· exact ha (ne_of_apply_ne _ hij)
· rfl
· rfl
· exact hd (ne_of_apply_ne _ hij)
#align matrix.is_diag.from_blocks Matrix.IsDiag.fromBlocks
/-- This is the `iff` version of `Matrix.IsDiag.fromBlocks`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/IsDiag.lean | 169 | 179 | theorem isDiag_fromBlocks_iff [Zero α] {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {C : Matrix n m α}
{D : Matrix n n α} : (A.fromBlocks B C D).IsDiag ↔ A.IsDiag ∧ B = 0 ∧ C = 0 ∧ D.IsDiag := by |
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨fun i j hij => ?_, ext fun i j => ?_, ext fun i j => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
· exact h (Sum.inl_injective.ne hij)
· exact h Sum.inl_ne_inr
· exact h Sum.inr_ne_inl
· exact h (Sum.inr_injective.ne hij)
· rintro ⟨ha, hb, hc, hd⟩
convert IsDiag.fromBlocks ha hd
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Setoid.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset
#align_import group_theory.double_coset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
/-!
# Double cosets
This file defines double cosets for two subgroups `H K` of a group `G` and the quotient of `G` by
the double coset relation, i.e. `H \ G / K`. We also prove that `G` can be written as a disjoint
union of the double cosets and that if one of `H` or `K` is the trivial group (i.e. `⊥` ) then
this is the usual left or right quotient of a group by a subgroup.
## Main definitions
* `rel`: The double coset relation defined by two subgroups `H K` of `G`.
* `Doset.quotient`: The quotient of `G` by the double coset relation, i.e, `H \ G / K`.
-/
-- Porting note: removed import
-- import Mathlib.Tactic.Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {α : Type*} [Mul α] (J : Subgroup G) (g : G)
open MulOpposite
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Doset
/-- The double coset as an element of `Set α` corresponding to `s a t` -/
def doset (a : α) (s t : Set α) : Set α :=
s * {a} * t
#align doset Doset.doset
lemma doset_eq_image2 (a : α) (s t : Set α) : doset a s t = Set.image2 (· * a * ·) s t := by
simp_rw [doset, Set.mul_singleton, ← Set.image2_mul, Set.image2_image_left]
theorem mem_doset {s t : Set α} {a b : α} : b ∈ doset a s t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, b = x * a * y := by
simp only [doset_eq_image2, Set.mem_image2, eq_comm]
#align doset.mem_doset Doset.mem_doset
theorem mem_doset_self (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) : a ∈ doset a H K :=
mem_doset.mpr ⟨1, H.one_mem, 1, K.one_mem, (one_mul a).symm.trans (mul_one (1 * a)).symm⟩
#align doset.mem_doset_self Doset.mem_doset_self
theorem doset_eq_of_mem {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G} (hb : b ∈ doset a H K) :
doset b H K = doset a H K := by
obtain ⟨h, hh, k, hk, rfl⟩ := mem_doset.1 hb
rw [doset, doset, ← Set.singleton_mul_singleton, ← Set.singleton_mul_singleton, mul_assoc,
mul_assoc, Subgroup.singleton_mul_subgroup hk, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
Subgroup.subgroup_mul_singleton hh]
#align doset.doset_eq_of_mem Doset.doset_eq_of_mem
theorem mem_doset_of_not_disjoint {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G}
(h : ¬Disjoint (doset a H K) (doset b H K)) : b ∈ doset a H K := by
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff] at h
simp only [mem_doset] at *
obtain ⟨x, ⟨l, hl, r, hr, hrx⟩, y, hy, ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨y⁻¹ * l, H.mul_mem (H.inv_mem hy) hl, r * r'⁻¹, K.mul_mem hr (K.inv_mem hr'), ?_⟩
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]
#align doset.mem_doset_of_not_disjoint Doset.mem_doset_of_not_disjoint
theorem eq_of_not_disjoint {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G}
(h : ¬Disjoint (doset a H K) (doset b H K)) : doset a H K = doset b H K := by
rw [disjoint_comm] at h
have ha : a ∈ doset b H K := mem_doset_of_not_disjoint h
apply doset_eq_of_mem ha
#align doset.eq_of_not_disjoint Doset.eq_of_not_disjoint
/-- The setoid defined by the double_coset relation -/
def setoid (H K : Set G) : Setoid G :=
Setoid.ker fun x => doset x H K
#align doset.setoid Doset.setoid
/-- Quotient of `G` by the double coset relation, i.e. `H \ G / K` -/
def Quotient (H K : Set G) : Type _ :=
_root_.Quotient (setoid H K)
#align doset.quotient Doset.Quotient
theorem rel_iff {H K : Subgroup G} {x y : G} :
(setoid ↑H ↑K).Rel x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ H, ∃ b ∈ K, y = a * x * b :=
Iff.trans
⟨fun hxy => (congr_arg _ hxy).mpr (mem_doset_self H K y), fun hxy => (doset_eq_of_mem hxy).symm⟩
mem_doset
#align doset.rel_iff Doset.rel_iff
theorem bot_rel_eq_leftRel (H : Subgroup G) :
(setoid ↑(⊥ : Subgroup G) ↑H).Rel = (QuotientGroup.leftRel H).Rel := by
ext a b
rw [rel_iff, Setoid.Rel, QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl : a = 1, b, hb, rfl⟩
change a⁻¹ * (1 * a * b) ∈ H
rwa [one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_left]
· rintro (h : a⁻¹ * b ∈ H)
exact ⟨1, rfl, a⁻¹ * b, h, by rw [one_mul, mul_inv_cancel_left]⟩
#align doset.bot_rel_eq_left_rel Doset.bot_rel_eq_leftRel
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/DoubleCoset.lean | 105 | 114 | theorem rel_bot_eq_right_group_rel (H : Subgroup G) :
(setoid ↑H ↑(⊥ : Subgroup G)).Rel = (QuotientGroup.rightRel H).Rel := by |
ext a b
rw [rel_iff, Setoid.Rel, QuotientGroup.rightRel_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, hb, a, rfl : a = 1, rfl⟩
change b * a * 1 * a⁻¹ ∈ H
rwa [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_right]
· rintro (h : b * a⁻¹ ∈ H)
exact ⟨b * a⁻¹, h, 1, rfl, by rw [mul_one, inv_mul_cancel_right]⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Canonical.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Floor
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Group
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
#align_import data.real.nnreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1abe23ae96fef89ad30d9f4362c307f72a55010"
/-!
# Nonnegative real numbers
In this file we define `NNReal` (notation: `ℝ≥0`) to be the type of non-negative real numbers,
a.k.a. the interval `[0, ∞)`. We also define the following operations and structures on `ℝ≥0`:
* the order on `ℝ≥0` is the restriction of the order on `ℝ`; these relations define a conditionally
complete linear order with a bottom element, `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot`;
* `a + b` and `a * b` are the restrictions of addition and multiplication of real numbers to `ℝ≥0`;
these operations together with `0 = ⟨0, _⟩` and `1 = ⟨1, _⟩` turn `ℝ≥0` into a conditionally
complete linear ordered archimedean commutative semifield; we have no typeclass for this in
`mathlib` yet, so we define the following instances instead:
- `LinearOrderedSemiring ℝ≥0`;
- `OrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0`;
- `CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0`;
- `LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0`;
- `CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0`;
- `Archimedean ℝ≥0`;
- `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ℝ≥0`.
These instances are derived from corresponding instances about the type `{x : α // 0 ≤ x}` in an
appropriate ordered field/ring/group/monoid `α`, see `Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Ring`.
* `Real.toNNReal x` is defined as `⟨max x 0, _⟩`, i.e. `↑(Real.toNNReal x) = x` when `0 ≤ x` and
`↑(Real.toNNReal x) = 0` otherwise.
We also define an instance `CanLift ℝ ℝ≥0`. This instance can be used by the `lift` tactic to
replace `x : ℝ` and `hx : 0 ≤ x` in the proof context with `x : ℝ≥0` while replacing all occurrences
of `x` with `↑x`. This tactic also works for a function `f : α → ℝ` with a hypothesis
`hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x`.
## Notations
This file defines `ℝ≥0` as a localized notation for `NNReal`.
-/
open Function
-- to ensure these instances are computable
/-- Nonnegative real numbers. -/
def NNReal := { r : ℝ // 0 ≤ r } deriving
Zero, One, Semiring, StrictOrderedSemiring, CommMonoidWithZero, CommSemiring,
SemilatticeInf, SemilatticeSup, DistribLattice, OrderedCommSemiring,
CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Inhabited
#align nnreal NNReal
namespace NNReal
scoped notation "ℝ≥0" => NNReal
noncomputable instance : FloorSemiring ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.floorSemiring
instance instDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.instDenselyOrdered
instance : OrderBot ℝ≥0 := inferInstance
instance : Archimedean ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.archimedean
noncomputable instance : Sub ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.sub
noncomputable instance : OrderedSub ℝ≥0 := Nonneg.orderedSub
noncomputable instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield ℝ≥0 :=
Nonneg.canonicallyLinearOrderedSemifield
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ`. -/
@[coe] def toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ := Subtype.val
instance : Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ := ⟨toReal⟩
-- Simp lemma to put back `n.val` into the normal form given by the coercion.
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_coe (n : ℝ≥0) : n.val = n :=
rfl
#align nnreal.val_eq_coe NNReal.val_eq_coe
instance canLift : CanLift ℝ ℝ≥0 toReal fun r => 0 ≤ r :=
Subtype.canLift _
#align nnreal.can_lift NNReal.canLift
@[ext] protected theorem eq {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) → n = m :=
Subtype.eq
#align nnreal.eq NNReal.eq
protected theorem eq_iff {n m : ℝ≥0} : (n : ℝ) = (m : ℝ) ↔ n = m :=
Subtype.ext_iff.symm
#align nnreal.eq_iff NNReal.eq_iff
theorem ne_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} : (x : ℝ) ≠ (y : ℝ) ↔ x ≠ y :=
not_congr <| NNReal.eq_iff
#align nnreal.ne_iff NNReal.ne_iff
protected theorem «forall» {p : ℝ≥0 → Prop} :
(∀ x : ℝ≥0, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x), p ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align nnreal.forall NNReal.forall
protected theorem «exists» {p : ℝ≥0 → Prop} :
(∃ x : ℝ≥0, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x), p ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align nnreal.exists NNReal.exists
/-- Reinterpret a real number `r` as a non-negative real number. Returns `0` if `r < 0`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.Real.toNNReal (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨max r 0, le_max_right _ _⟩
#align real.to_nnreal Real.toNNReal
theorem _root_.Real.coe_toNNReal (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) : (Real.toNNReal r : ℝ) = r :=
max_eq_left hr
#align real.coe_to_nnreal Real.coe_toNNReal
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : r.toNNReal = ⟨r, hr⟩ := by
simp_rw [Real.toNNReal, max_eq_left hr]
#align real.to_nnreal_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_of_nonneg
theorem _root_.Real.le_coe_toNNReal (r : ℝ) : r ≤ Real.toNNReal r :=
le_max_left r 0
#align real.le_coe_to_nnreal Real.le_coe_toNNReal
theorem coe_nonneg (r : ℝ≥0) : (0 : ℝ) ≤ r := r.2
#align nnreal.coe_nonneg NNReal.coe_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem coe_mk (a : ℝ) (ha) : toReal ⟨a, ha⟩ = a := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_mk NNReal.coe_mk
example : Zero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : One ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Add ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Sub ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Mul ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Inv ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : Div ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : LE ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Bot ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Inhabited ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : Nontrivial ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
protected theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) := Subtype.coe_injective
#align nnreal.coe_injective NNReal.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_inj {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} : (r₁ : ℝ) = r₂ ↔ r₁ = r₂ :=
NNReal.coe_injective.eq_iff
#align nnreal.coe_eq NNReal.coe_inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-03")] protected alias coe_eq := coe_inj
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ((0 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 0 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_zero NNReal.coe_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_one : ((1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 1 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_one NNReal.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_add (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ + r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ + r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_add NNReal.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_mul (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ * r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = r₁ * r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_mul NNReal.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_inv (r : ℝ≥0) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_inv NNReal.coe_inv
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_div (r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ((r₁ / r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r₁ : ℝ) / r₂ :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_div NNReal.coe_div
#noalign nnreal.coe_bit0
#noalign nnreal.coe_bit1
protected theorem coe_two : ((2 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = 2 := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_two NNReal.coe_two
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_sub {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} (h : r₂ ≤ r₁) : ((r₁ - r₂ : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = ↑r₁ - ↑r₂ :=
max_eq_left <| le_sub_comm.2 <| by simp [show (r₂ : ℝ) ≤ r₁ from h]
#align nnreal.coe_sub NNReal.coe_sub
variable {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0} {x y : ℝ}
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_zero : (r : ℝ) = 0 ↔ r = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, coe_inj]
#align coe_eq_zero NNReal.coe_eq_zero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_eq_one : (r : ℝ) = 1 ↔ r = 1 := by rw [← coe_one, coe_inj]
#align coe_inj_one NNReal.coe_eq_one
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ne_zero : (r : ℝ) ≠ 0 ↔ r ≠ 0 := coe_eq_zero.not
#align nnreal.coe_ne_zero NNReal.coe_ne_zero
@[norm_cast] lemma coe_ne_one : (r : ℝ) ≠ 1 ↔ r ≠ 1 := coe_eq_one.not
example : CommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
/-- Coercion `ℝ≥0 → ℝ` as a `RingHom`.
Porting note (#11215): TODO: what if we define `Coe ℝ≥0 ℝ` using this function? -/
def toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ where
toFun := (↑)
map_one' := NNReal.coe_one
map_mul' := NNReal.coe_mul
map_zero' := NNReal.coe_zero
map_add' := NNReal.coe_add
#align nnreal.to_real_hom NNReal.toRealHom
@[simp] theorem coe_toRealHom : ⇑toRealHom = toReal := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_to_real_hom NNReal.coe_toRealHom
section Actions
/-- A `MulAction` over `ℝ` restricts to a `MulAction` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [MulAction ℝ M] : MulAction ℝ≥0 M :=
MulAction.compHom M toRealHom.toMonoidHom
theorem smul_def {M : Type*} [MulAction ℝ M] (c : ℝ≥0) (x : M) : c • x = (c : ℝ) • x :=
rfl
#align nnreal.smul_def NNReal.smul_def
instance {M N : Type*} [MulAction ℝ M] [MulAction ℝ N] [SMul M N] [IsScalarTower ℝ M N] :
IsScalarTower ℝ≥0 M N where smul_assoc r := (smul_assoc (r : ℝ) : _)
instance smulCommClass_left {M N : Type*} [MulAction ℝ N] [SMul M N] [SMulCommClass ℝ M N] :
SMulCommClass ℝ≥0 M N where smul_comm r := (smul_comm (r : ℝ) : _)
#align nnreal.smul_comm_class_left NNReal.smulCommClass_left
instance smulCommClass_right {M N : Type*} [MulAction ℝ N] [SMul M N] [SMulCommClass M ℝ N] :
SMulCommClass M ℝ≥0 N where smul_comm m r := (smul_comm m (r : ℝ) : _)
#align nnreal.smul_comm_class_right NNReal.smulCommClass_right
/-- A `DistribMulAction` over `ℝ` restricts to a `DistribMulAction` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [AddMonoid M] [DistribMulAction ℝ M] : DistribMulAction ℝ≥0 M :=
DistribMulAction.compHom M toRealHom.toMonoidHom
/-- A `Module` over `ℝ` restricts to a `Module` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module ℝ M] : Module ℝ≥0 M :=
Module.compHom M toRealHom
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: after this line, `↑` uses `Algebra.cast` instead of `toReal`
/-- An `Algebra` over `ℝ` restricts to an `Algebra` over `ℝ≥0`. -/
instance {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra ℝ A] : Algebra ℝ≥0 A where
smul := (· • ·)
commutes' r x := by simp [Algebra.commutes]
smul_def' r x := by simp [← Algebra.smul_def (r : ℝ) x, smul_def]
toRingHom := (algebraMap ℝ A).comp (toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+* ℝ)
instance : StarRing ℝ≥0 := starRingOfComm
instance : TrivialStar ℝ≥0 where
star_trivial _ := rfl
instance : StarModule ℝ≥0 ℝ where
star_smul := by simp only [star_trivial, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
-- verify that the above produces instances we might care about
example : Algebra ℝ≥0 ℝ := by infer_instance
example : DistribMulAction ℝ≥0ˣ ℝ := by infer_instance
end Actions
example : MonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : CommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_indicator {α} (s : Set α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (a : α) :
((s.indicator f a : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = s.indicator (fun x => ↑(f x)) a :=
(toRealHom : ℝ≥0 →+ ℝ).map_indicator _ _ _
#align nnreal.coe_indicator NNReal.coe_indicator
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ) ^ n := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_pow NNReal.coe_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zpow (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (r : ℝ) ^ n := rfl
#align nnreal.coe_zpow NNReal.coe_zpow
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_sum (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).sum :=
map_list_sum toRealHom l
#align nnreal.coe_list_sum NNReal.coe_list_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_list_prod (l : List ℝ≥0) : ((l.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (l.map (↑)).prod :=
map_list_prod toRealHom l
#align nnreal.coe_list_prod NNReal.coe_list_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.sum : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).sum :=
map_multiset_sum toRealHom s
#align nnreal.coe_multiset_sum NNReal.coe_multiset_sum
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_multiset_prod (s : Multiset ℝ≥0) : ((s.prod : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (s.map (↑)).prod :=
map_multiset_prod toRealHom s
#align nnreal.coe_multiset_prod NNReal.coe_multiset_prod
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_sum toRealHom _ _
#align nnreal.coe_sum NNReal.coe_sum
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∑ a ∈ s, f a) = ∑ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_sum, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.sum_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
#align real.to_nnreal_sum_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_sum_of_nonneg
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_prod {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} : ↑(∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, (f a : ℝ) :=
map_prod toRealHom _ _
#align nnreal.coe_prod NNReal.coe_prod
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg {α} {s : Finset α} {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ a, a ∈ s → 0 ≤ f a) :
Real.toNNReal (∏ a ∈ s, f a) = ∏ a ∈ s, Real.toNNReal (f a) := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_prod, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (Finset.prod_nonneg hf)]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hxs => by rw [Real.coe_toNNReal _ (hf x hxs)]
#align real.to_nnreal_prod_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_prod_of_nonneg
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem coe_nsmul (r : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : ↑(n • r) = n • (r : ℝ) := rfl
#align nnreal.nsmul_coe NNReal.coe_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : (↑(↑n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = n :=
map_natCast toRealHom n
#align nnreal.coe_nat_cast NNReal.coe_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_nat_cast := NNReal.coe_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_ofScientific (m : ℕ) (s : Bool) (e : ℕ) :
↑(OfScientific.ofScientific m s e : ℝ≥0) = (OfScientific.ofScientific m s e : ℝ) :=
rfl
noncomputable example : LinearOrder ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_coe : (r₁ : ℝ) ≤ r₂ ↔ r₁ ≤ r₂ := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.coe_le_coe NNReal.coe_le_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_coe : (r₁ : ℝ) < r₂ ↔ r₁ < r₂ := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.coe_lt_coe NNReal.coe_lt_coe
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pos : (0 : ℝ) < r ↔ 0 < r := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.coe_pos NNReal.coe_pos
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_le_coe : 1 ≤ (r : ℝ) ↔ 1 ≤ r := by rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma one_lt_coe : 1 < (r : ℝ) ↔ 1 < r := by rw [← coe_lt_coe, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_one : (r : ℝ) ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 := by rw [← coe_le_coe, coe_one]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_one : (r : ℝ) < 1 ↔ r < 1 := by rw [← coe_lt_coe, coe_one]
@[mono] lemma coe_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) := fun _ _ => NNReal.coe_le_coe.2
#align nnreal.coe_mono NNReal.coe_mono
/-- Alias for the use of `gcongr` -/
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, GCongr.toReal_le_toReal⟩ := coe_le_coe
protected theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_mono : Monotone Real.toNNReal := fun _ _ h =>
max_le_max h (le_refl 0)
#align real.to_nnreal_mono Real.toNNReal_mono
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : Real.toNNReal r = r :=
NNReal.eq <| max_eq_left r.2
#align real.to_nnreal_coe Real.toNNReal_coe
@[simp]
theorem mk_natCast (n : ℕ) : @Eq ℝ≥0 (⟨(n : ℝ), n.cast_nonneg⟩ : ℝ≥0) n :=
NNReal.eq (NNReal.coe_natCast n).symm
#align nnreal.mk_coe_nat NNReal.mk_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias mk_coe_nat := mk_natCast
-- Porting note: place this in the `Real` namespace
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : Real.toNNReal n = n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp [Real.coe_toNNReal]
#align nnreal.to_nnreal_coe_nat NNReal.toNNReal_coe_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Real.toNNReal (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
toNNReal_coe_nat n
/-- `Real.toNNReal` and `NNReal.toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ` form a Galois insertion. -/
noncomputable def gi : GaloisInsertion Real.toNNReal (↑) :=
GaloisInsertion.monotoneIntro NNReal.coe_mono Real.toNNReal_mono Real.le_coe_toNNReal fun _ =>
Real.toNNReal_coe
#align nnreal.gi NNReal.gi
-- note that anything involving the (decidability of the) linear order,
-- will be noncomputable, everything else should not be.
example : OrderBot ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : PartialOrder ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : DistribLattice ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : SemilatticeInf ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : SemilatticeSup ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : OrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedCommMonoid ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
noncomputable example : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : DenselyOrdered ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
example : NoMaxOrder ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
instance instPosSMulStrictMono {α} [Preorder α] [MulAction ℝ α] [PosSMulStrictMono ℝ α] :
PosSMulStrictMono ℝ≥0 α where
elim _r hr _a₁ _a₂ ha := (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left ha (coe_pos.2 hr):)
instance instSMulPosStrictMono {α} [Zero α] [Preorder α] [MulAction ℝ α] [SMulPosStrictMono ℝ α] :
SMulPosStrictMono ℝ≥0 α where
elim _a ha _r₁ _r₂ hr := (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_right (coe_lt_coe.2 hr) ha:)
/-- If `a` is a nonnegative real number, then the closed interval `[0, a]` in `ℝ` is order
isomorphic to the interval `Set.Iic a`. -/
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore once `simps` supports `ℝ≥0` @[simps!? apply_coe_coe]
def orderIsoIccZeroCoe (a : ℝ≥0) : Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) a ≃o Set.Iic a where
toEquiv := Equiv.Set.sep (Set.Ici 0) fun x : ℝ => x ≤ a
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align nnreal.order_iso_Icc_zero_coe NNReal.orderIsoIccZeroCoe
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIccZeroCoe_apply_coe_coe (a : ℝ≥0) (b : Set.Icc (0 : ℝ) a) :
(orderIsoIccZeroCoe a b : ℝ) = b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem orderIsoIccZeroCoe_symm_apply_coe (a : ℝ≥0) (b : Set.Iic a) :
((orderIsoIccZeroCoe a).symm b : ℝ) = b :=
rfl
#align nnreal.order_iso_Icc_zero_coe_symm_apply_coe NNReal.orderIsoIccZeroCoe_symm_apply_coe
-- note we need the `@` to make the `Membership.mem` have a sensible type
theorem coe_image {s : Set ℝ≥0} :
(↑) '' s = { x : ℝ | ∃ h : 0 ≤ x, @Membership.mem ℝ≥0 _ _ ⟨x, h⟩ s } :=
Subtype.coe_image
#align nnreal.coe_image NNReal.coe_image
theorem bddAbove_coe {s : Set ℝ≥0} : BddAbove (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) ↔ BddAbove s :=
Iff.intro
(fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
⟨Real.toNNReal b, fun ⟨y, _⟩ hys =>
show y ≤ max b 0 from le_max_of_le_left <| hb <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hys⟩)
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => ⟨b, fun _ ⟨_, hx, eq⟩ => eq ▸ hb hx⟩
#align nnreal.bdd_above_coe NNReal.bddAbove_coe
theorem bddBelow_coe (s : Set ℝ≥0) : BddBelow (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨q, _, eq⟩ => eq ▸ q.2⟩
#align nnreal.bdd_below_coe NNReal.bddBelow_coe
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ℝ≥0 :=
Nonneg.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot 0
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (s : Set ℝ≥0) : (↑(sSup s) : ℝ) = sSup (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|hs
· simp
by_cases H : BddAbove s
· have A : sSup (Subtype.val '' s) ∈ Set.Ici 0 := by
apply Real.sSup_nonneg
rintro - ⟨y, -, rfl⟩
exact y.2
exact (@subset_sSup_of_within ℝ (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) _ _ (_) s hs H A).symm
· simp only [csSup_of_not_bddAbove H, csSup_empty, bot_eq_zero', NNReal.coe_zero]
apply (Real.sSup_of_not_bddAbove ?_).symm
contrapose! H
exact bddAbove_coe.1 H
#align nnreal.coe_Sup NNReal.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast] -- Porting note: add `simp`
theorem coe_iSup {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → ℝ≥0) : (↑(⨆ i, s i) : ℝ) = ⨆ i, ↑(s i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, coe_sSup, ← Set.range_comp]; rfl
#align nnreal.coe_supr NNReal.coe_iSup
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (s : Set ℝ≥0) : (↑(sInf s) : ℝ) = sInf (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) '' s) := by
rcases Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|hs
· simp only [Set.image_empty, Real.sInf_empty, coe_eq_zero]
exact @subset_sInf_emptyset ℝ (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) _ _ (_)
have A : sInf (Subtype.val '' s) ∈ Set.Ici 0 := by
apply Real.sInf_nonneg
rintro - ⟨y, -, rfl⟩
exact y.2
exact (@subset_sInf_of_within ℝ (Set.Ici (0 : ℝ)) _ _ (_) s hs (OrderBot.bddBelow s) A).symm
#align nnreal.coe_Inf NNReal.coe_sInf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set ℝ≥0) = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_sInf, Set.image_empty, Real.sInf_empty]
#align nnreal.Inf_empty NNReal.sInf_empty
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} (s : ι → ℝ≥0) : (↑(⨅ i, s i) : ℝ) = ⨅ i, ↑(s i) := by
rw [iInf, iInf, coe_sInf, ← Set.range_comp]; rfl
#align nnreal.coe_infi NNReal.coe_iInf
theorem le_iInf_add_iInf {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0}
{a : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ i j, a ≤ f i + g j) : a ≤ (⨅ i, f i) + ⨅ j, g j := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add, coe_iInf, coe_iInf]
exact le_ciInf_add_ciInf h
#align nnreal.le_infi_add_infi NNReal.le_iInf_add_iInf
example : Archimedean ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove?
instance covariant_add : CovariantClass ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0 (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) := inferInstance
#align nnreal.covariant_add NNReal.covariant_add
instance contravariant_add : ContravariantClass ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0 (· + ·) (· < ·) := inferInstance
#align nnreal.contravariant_add NNReal.contravariant_add
instance covariant_mul : CovariantClass ℝ≥0 ℝ≥0 (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) := inferInstance
#align nnreal.covariant_mul NNReal.covariant_mul
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: delete?
nonrec theorem le_of_forall_pos_le_add {a b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∀ ε, 0 < ε → a ≤ b + ε) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_forall_pos_le_add h
#align nnreal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add NNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add
theorem lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn (a b : ℝ≥0) :
a < b ↔ ∃ q : ℚ, 0 ≤ q ∧ a < Real.toNNReal q ∧ Real.toNNReal q < b :=
Iff.intro
(fun h : (↑a : ℝ) < (↑b : ℝ) =>
let ⟨q, haq, hqb⟩ := exists_rat_btwn h
have : 0 ≤ (q : ℝ) := le_trans a.2 <| le_of_lt haq
⟨q, Rat.cast_nonneg.1 this, by
simp [Real.coe_toNNReal _ this, NNReal.coe_lt_coe.symm, haq, hqb]⟩)
fun ⟨q, _, haq, hqb⟩ => lt_trans haq hqb
#align nnreal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn NNReal.lt_iff_exists_rat_btwn
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : ℝ≥0) = 0 := rfl
#align nnreal.bot_eq_zero NNReal.bot_eq_zero
theorem mul_sup (a b c : ℝ≥0) : a * (b ⊔ c) = a * b ⊔ a * c :=
mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| zero_le a
#align nnreal.mul_sup NNReal.mul_sup
theorem sup_mul (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a ⊔ b) * c = a * c ⊔ b * c :=
max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ <| zero_le c
#align nnreal.sup_mul NNReal.sup_mul
theorem mul_finset_sup {α} (r : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) :
r * s.sup f = s.sup fun a => r * f a :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp _ (NNReal.mul_sup r) (mul_zero r)
#align nnreal.mul_finset_sup NNReal.mul_finset_sup
theorem finset_sup_mul {α} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f * r = s.sup fun a => f a * r :=
Finset.comp_sup_eq_sup_comp (· * r) (fun x y => NNReal.sup_mul x y r) (zero_mul r)
#align nnreal.finset_sup_mul NNReal.finset_sup_mul
theorem finset_sup_div {α} {f : α → ℝ≥0} {s : Finset α} (r : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup f / r = s.sup fun a => f a / r := by simp only [div_eq_inv_mul, mul_finset_sup]
#align nnreal.finset_sup_div NNReal.finset_sup_div
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max (x y : ℝ≥0) : ((max x y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = max (x : ℝ) (y : ℝ) :=
NNReal.coe_mono.map_max
#align nnreal.coe_max NNReal.coe_max
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min (x y : ℝ≥0) : ((min x y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = min (x : ℝ) (y : ℝ) :=
NNReal.coe_mono.map_min
#align nnreal.coe_min NNReal.coe_min
@[simp]
theorem zero_le_coe {q : ℝ≥0} : 0 ≤ (q : ℝ) :=
q.2
#align nnreal.zero_le_coe NNReal.zero_le_coe
instance instOrderedSMul {M : Type*} [OrderedAddCommMonoid M] [Module ℝ M] [OrderedSMul ℝ M] :
OrderedSMul ℝ≥0 M where
smul_lt_smul_of_pos hab hc := (smul_lt_smul_of_pos_left hab (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hc) : _)
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_pos {a b c} hab _ :=
lt_of_smul_lt_smul_of_nonneg_left (by exact hab) (NNReal.coe_nonneg c)
end NNReal
open NNReal
namespace Real
section ToNNReal
@[simp]
theorem coe_toNNReal' (r : ℝ) : (Real.toNNReal r : ℝ) = max r 0 :=
rfl
#align real.coe_to_nnreal' Real.coe_toNNReal'
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_zero : Real.toNNReal 0 = 0 := NNReal.eq <| coe_toNNReal _ le_rfl
#align real.to_nnreal_zero Real.toNNReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_one : Real.toNNReal 1 = 1 := NNReal.eq <| coe_toNNReal _ zero_le_one
#align real.to_nnreal_one Real.toNNReal_one
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_pos {r : ℝ} : 0 < Real.toNNReal r ↔ 0 < r := by
simp [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, lt_irrefl]
#align real.to_nnreal_pos Real.toNNReal_pos
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_eq_zero {r : ℝ} : Real.toNNReal r = 0 ↔ r ≤ 0 := by
simpa [-toNNReal_pos] using not_iff_not.2 (@toNNReal_pos r)
#align real.to_nnreal_eq_zero Real.toNNReal_eq_zero
theorem toNNReal_of_nonpos {r : ℝ} : r ≤ 0 → Real.toNNReal r = 0 :=
toNNReal_eq_zero.2
#align real.to_nnreal_of_nonpos Real.toNNReal_of_nonpos
lemma toNNReal_eq_iff_eq_coe {r : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0} (hp : p ≠ 0) : r.toNNReal = p ↔ r = p :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ (coe_toNNReal _ <| not_lt.1 fun hlt ↦ hp <| h ▸ toNNReal_of_nonpos hlt.le).symm,
fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ toNNReal_coe⟩
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_eq_one {r : ℝ} : r.toNNReal = 1 ↔ r = 1 := toNNReal_eq_iff_eq_coe one_ne_zero
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_eq_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : r.toNNReal = n ↔ r = n :=
mod_cast toNNReal_eq_iff_eq_coe <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias toNNReal_eq_nat_cast := toNNReal_eq_natCast
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_eq_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
r.toNNReal = no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ r = OfNat.ofNat n :=
toNNReal_eq_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff {r p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
toNNReal r ≤ toNNReal p ↔ r ≤ p := by simp [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, hp]
#align real.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal_iff Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_le_one {r : ℝ} : r.toNNReal ≤ 1 ↔ r ≤ 1 := by
simpa using toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff zero_le_one
@[simp]
lemma one_lt_toNNReal {r : ℝ} : 1 < r.toNNReal ↔ 1 < r := by
simpa only [not_le] using toNNReal_le_one.not
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_le_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : r.toNNReal ≤ n ↔ r ≤ n := by
simpa using toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff n.cast_nonneg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias toNNReal_le_nat_cast := toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma natCast_lt_toNNReal {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} : n < r.toNNReal ↔ n < r := by
simpa only [not_le] using toNNReal_le_natCast.not
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_lt_toNNReal := natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_le_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
r.toNNReal ≤ no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ r ≤ n :=
toNNReal_le_natCast
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_lt_toNNReal {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) < r.toNNReal ↔ n < r :=
natCast_lt_toNNReal
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff {r p : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
toNNReal r = toNNReal p ↔ r = p := by simp [← coe_inj, coe_toNNReal, hr, hp]
#align real.to_nnreal_eq_to_nnreal_iff Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff' {r p : ℝ} : Real.toNNReal r < Real.toNNReal p ↔ r < p ∧ 0 < p :=
NNReal.coe_lt_coe.symm.trans max_lt_max_left_iff
#align real.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal_iff' Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff {r p : ℝ} (h : 0 < p) :
Real.toNNReal r < Real.toNNReal p ↔ r < p :=
toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'.trans (and_iff_left h)
#align real.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal_iff Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff
theorem lt_of_toNNReal_lt {r p : ℝ} (h : r.toNNReal < p.toNNReal) : r < p :=
(Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff <| Real.toNNReal_pos.1 (ne_bot_of_gt h).bot_lt).1 h
theorem toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg {r p : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Real.toNNReal r < Real.toNNReal p ↔ r < p :=
toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff'.trans ⟨And.left, fun h => ⟨h, lt_of_le_of_lt hr h⟩⟩
#align real.to_nnreal_lt_to_nnreal_iff_of_nonneg Real.toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff_of_nonneg
lemma toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff' {r p : ℝ} : r.toNNReal ≤ p.toNNReal ↔ r ≤ p ∨ r ≤ 0 := by
simp_rw [← not_lt, toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff', not_and_or]
lemma toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff_of_pos {r p : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : r.toNNReal ≤ p.toNNReal ↔ r ≤ p := by
simp [toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff', hr.not_le]
@[simp]
lemma one_le_toNNReal {r : ℝ} : 1 ≤ r.toNNReal ↔ 1 ≤ r := by
simpa using toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff_of_pos one_pos
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_lt_one {r : ℝ} : r.toNNReal < 1 ↔ r < 1 := by simp only [← not_le, one_le_toNNReal]
@[simp]
lemma natCastle_toNNReal' {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : ↑n ≤ r.toNNReal ↔ n ≤ r ∨ n = 0 := by
simpa [n.cast_nonneg.le_iff_eq] using toNNReal_le_toNNReal_iff' (r := n)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_le_toNNReal' := natCastle_toNNReal'
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_lt_natCast' {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} : r.toNNReal < n ↔ r < n ∧ n ≠ 0 := by
simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using toNNReal_lt_toNNReal_iff' (r := r) (p := n)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias toNNReal_lt_nat_cast' := toNNReal_lt_natCast'
lemma natCast_le_toNNReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n ≤ r.toNNReal ↔ n ≤ r := by simp [hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_le_toNNReal := natCast_le_toNNReal
lemma toNNReal_lt_natCast {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : r.toNNReal < n ↔ r < n := by simp [hn]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias toNNReal_lt_nat_cast := toNNReal_lt_natCast
@[simp]
lemma toNNReal_lt_ofNat {r : ℝ} {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
r.toNNReal < no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ↔ r < OfNat.ofNat n :=
toNNReal_lt_natCast (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_le_toNNReal {n : ℕ} {r : ℝ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) ≤ r.toNNReal ↔ OfNat.ofNat n ≤ r :=
natCast_le_toNNReal (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem toNNReal_add {r p : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
Real.toNNReal (r + p) = Real.toNNReal r + Real.toNNReal p :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp [hr, hp, add_nonneg]
#align real.to_nnreal_add Real.toNNReal_add
theorem toNNReal_add_toNNReal {r p : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
Real.toNNReal r + Real.toNNReal p = Real.toNNReal (r + p) :=
(Real.toNNReal_add hr hp).symm
#align real.to_nnreal_add_to_nnreal Real.toNNReal_add_toNNReal
theorem toNNReal_le_toNNReal {r p : ℝ} (h : r ≤ p) : Real.toNNReal r ≤ Real.toNNReal p :=
Real.toNNReal_mono h
#align real.to_nnreal_le_to_nnreal Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal
theorem toNNReal_add_le {r p : ℝ} : Real.toNNReal (r + p) ≤ Real.toNNReal r + Real.toNNReal p :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| max_le (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _)) NNReal.zero_le_coe
#align real.to_nnreal_add_le Real.toNNReal_add_le
theorem toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe {r : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0} : toNNReal r ≤ p ↔ r ≤ ↑p :=
NNReal.gi.gc r p
#align real.to_nnreal_le_iff_le_coe Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
theorem le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le {r : ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) : r ≤ Real.toNNReal p ↔ ↑r ≤ p := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, Real.coe_toNNReal p hp]
#align real.le_to_nnreal_iff_coe_le Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le
theorem le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le' {r : ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : r ≤ Real.toNNReal p ↔ ↑r ≤ p :=
(le_or_lt 0 p).elim le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le fun hp => by
simp only [(hp.trans_le r.coe_nonneg).not_le, toNNReal_eq_zero.2 hp.le, hr.not_le]
#align real.le_to_nnreal_iff_coe_le' Real.le_toNNReal_iff_coe_le'
theorem toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe {r : ℝ} {p : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 ≤ r) : Real.toNNReal r < p ↔ r < ↑p := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Real.coe_toNNReal r ha]
#align real.to_nnreal_lt_iff_lt_coe Real.toNNReal_lt_iff_lt_coe
theorem lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt {r : ℝ≥0} {p : ℝ} : r < Real.toNNReal p ↔ ↑r < p :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe
#align real.lt_to_nnreal_iff_coe_lt Real.lt_toNNReal_iff_coe_lt
#noalign real.to_nnreal_bit0
#noalign real.to_nnreal_bit1
theorem toNNReal_pow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ n).toNNReal = x.toNNReal ^ n := by
rw [← coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, Real.coe_toNNReal _ (pow_nonneg hx _),
Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
#align real.to_nnreal_pow Real.toNNReal_pow
theorem toNNReal_mul {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) :
Real.toNNReal (p * q) = Real.toNNReal p * Real.toNNReal q :=
NNReal.eq <| by simp [mul_max_of_nonneg, hp]
#align real.to_nnreal_mul Real.toNNReal_mul
end ToNNReal
end Real
open Real
namespace NNReal
section Mul
theorem mul_eq_mul_left {a b c : ℝ≥0} (h : a ≠ 0) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c := by
rw [mul_eq_mul_left_iff, or_iff_left h]
#align nnreal.mul_eq_mul_left NNReal.mul_eq_mul_left
end Mul
section Pow
theorem pow_antitone_exp {a : ℝ≥0} (m n : ℕ) (mn : m ≤ n) (a1 : a ≤ 1) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_one (zero_le a) a1 mn
#align nnreal.pow_antitone_exp NNReal.pow_antitone_exp
nonrec theorem exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one {a b : ℝ≥0} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 1) :
∃ n : ℕ, b ^ n < a := by
simpa only [← coe_pow, NNReal.coe_lt_coe] using
exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one (NNReal.coe_pos.2 ha) (NNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hb)
#align nnreal.exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one NNReal.exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one
nonrec theorem exists_mem_Ico_zpow {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : 1 < y) :
∃ n : ℤ, x ∈ Set.Ico (y ^ n) (y ^ (n + 1)) :=
exists_mem_Ico_zpow (α := ℝ) hx.bot_lt hy
#align nnreal.exists_mem_Ico_zpow NNReal.exists_mem_Ico_zpow
nonrec theorem exists_mem_Ioc_zpow {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : 1 < y) :
∃ n : ℤ, x ∈ Set.Ioc (y ^ n) (y ^ (n + 1)) :=
exists_mem_Ioc_zpow (α := ℝ) hx.bot_lt hy
#align nnreal.exists_mem_Ioc_zpow NNReal.exists_mem_Ioc_zpow
end Pow
section Sub
/-!
### Lemmas about subtraction
In this section we provide a few lemmas about subtraction that do not fit well into any other
typeclass. For lemmas about subtraction and addition see lemmas about `OrderedSub` in the file
`Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Basic`. See also `mul_tsub` and `tsub_mul`.
-/
theorem sub_def {r p : ℝ≥0} : r - p = Real.toNNReal (r - p) :=
rfl
#align nnreal.sub_def NNReal.sub_def
theorem coe_sub_def {r p : ℝ≥0} : ↑(r - p) = max (r - p : ℝ) 0 :=
rfl
#align nnreal.coe_sub_def NNReal.coe_sub_def
example : OrderedSub ℝ≥0 := by infer_instance
theorem sub_div (a b c : ℝ≥0) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
tsub_div _ _ _
#align nnreal.sub_div NNReal.sub_div
end Sub
section Inv
#align nnreal.sum_div Finset.sum_div
@[simp]
theorem inv_le {r p : ℝ≥0} (h : r ≠ 0) : r⁻¹ ≤ p ↔ 1 ≤ r * p := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h), mul_inv_cancel h]
#align nnreal.inv_le NNReal.inv_le
theorem inv_le_of_le_mul {r p : ℝ≥0} (h : 1 ≤ r * p) : r⁻¹ ≤ p := by
by_cases r = 0 <;> simp [*, inv_le]
#align nnreal.inv_le_of_le_mul NNReal.inv_le_of_le_mul
@[simp]
theorem le_inv_iff_mul_le {r p : ℝ≥0} (h : p ≠ 0) : r ≤ p⁻¹ ↔ r * p ≤ 1 := by
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h), mul_inv_cancel h, mul_comm]
#align nnreal.le_inv_iff_mul_le NNReal.le_inv_iff_mul_le
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Real/NNReal.lean | 933 | 934 | theorem lt_inv_iff_mul_lt {r p : ℝ≥0} (h : p ≠ 0) : r < p⁻¹ ↔ r * p < 1 := by |
rw [← mul_lt_mul_left (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h), mul_inv_cancel h, mul_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Alena Gusakov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alena Gusakov, Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.strongly_regular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2b35fc7bea4640cb75e477e83f32fbd538920822"
/-!
# Strongly regular graphs
## Main definitions
* `G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ` (see `SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith`) is a structure for
a `SimpleGraph` satisfying the following conditions:
* The cardinality of the vertex set is `n`
* `G` is a regular graph with degree `k`
* The number of common neighbors between any two adjacent vertices in `G` is `ℓ`
* The number of common neighbors between any two nonadjacent vertices in `G` is `μ`
## Main theorems
* `IsSRGWith.compl`: the complement of a strongly regular graph is strongly regular.
* `IsSRGWith.param_eq`: `k * (k - ℓ - 1) = (n - k - 1) * μ` when `0 < n`.
* `IsSRGWith.matrix_eq`: let `A` and `C` be `G`'s and `Gᶜ`'s adjacency matrices respectively and
`I` be the identity matrix, then `A ^ 2 = k • I + ℓ • A + μ • C`.
-/
open Finset
universe u
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
/-- A graph is strongly regular with parameters `n k ℓ μ` if
* its vertex set has cardinality `n`
* it is regular with degree `k`
* every pair of adjacent vertices has `ℓ` common neighbors
* every pair of nonadjacent vertices has `μ` common neighbors
-/
structure IsSRGWith (n k ℓ μ : ℕ) : Prop where
card : Fintype.card V = n
regular : G.IsRegularOfDegree k
of_adj : ∀ v w : V, G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = ℓ
of_not_adj : Pairwise fun v w => ¬G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = μ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith
variable {G} {n k ℓ μ : ℕ}
/-- Empty graphs are strongly regular. Note that `ℓ` can take any value
for empty graphs, since there are no pairs of adjacent vertices. -/
theorem bot_strongly_regular : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) 0 ℓ 0 where
card := rfl
regular := bot_degree
of_adj := fun v w h => h.elim
of_not_adj := fun v w _h => by
simp only [card_eq_zero, Fintype.card_ofFinset, forall_true_left, not_false_iff, bot_adj]
ext
simp [mem_commonNeighbors]
#align simple_graph.bot_strongly_regular SimpleGraph.bot_strongly_regular
/-- Complete graphs are strongly regular. Note that `μ` can take any value
for complete graphs, since there are no distinct pairs of non-adjacent vertices. -/
theorem IsSRGWith.top :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) (Fintype.card V - 1) (Fintype.card V - 2) μ where
card := rfl
regular := IsRegularOfDegree.top
of_adj := fun v w h => by
rw [card_commonNeighbors_top]
exact h
of_not_adj := fun v w h h' => False.elim (h' ((top_adj v w).2 h))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.top SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.top
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) :
(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card =
2 * k - Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) := by
apply Nat.add_right_cancel (m := Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w))
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel, ← Set.toFinset_card]
-- Porting note: Set.toFinset_inter needs workaround to use unification to solve for one of the
-- instance arguments:
· simp [commonNeighbors, @Set.toFinset_inter _ _ _ _ _ _ (_),
← neighborFinset_def, Finset.card_union_add_card_inter, card_neighborFinset_eq_degree,
h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
· apply le_trans (card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left _ _ _)
simp [h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_eq SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
/-- Assuming `G` is strongly regular, `2*(k + 1) - m` in `G` is the number of vertices that are
adjacent to either `v` or `w` when `¬G.Adj v w`. So it's the cardinality of
`G.neighborSet v ∪ G.neighborSet w`. -/
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_not_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(hne : v ≠ w) (ha : ¬G.Adj v w) :
(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card = 2 * k - μ := by
rw [← h.of_not_adj hne ha]
apply h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_of_not_adj SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_not_adj
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(ha : G.Adj v w) : (G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card = 2 * k - ℓ := by
rw [← h.of_adj v w ha]
apply h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_of_adj SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_adj
theorem compl_neighborFinset_sdiff_inter_eq {v w : V} :
(G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} ∩ ((G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ \ {w}) =
((G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ) \ ({w} ∪ {v}) := by
ext
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp [imp_iff_not_or, or_assoc, or_comm, or_left_comm]
#align simple_graph.compl_neighbor_finset_sdiff_inter_eq SimpleGraph.compl_neighborFinset_sdiff_inter_eq
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/StronglyRegular.lean | 125 | 134 | theorem sdiff_compl_neighborFinset_inter_eq {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) :
((G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ) \ ({w} ∪ {v}) =
(G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ := by |
ext
simp only [and_imp, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_compl, and_iff_left_iff_imp, mem_neighborFinset,
mem_inter, mem_singleton]
rintro hnv hnw (rfl | rfl)
· exact hnv h
· apply hnw
rwa [adj_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.HittingTime
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import probability.martingale.upcrossing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# Doob's upcrossing estimate
Given a discrete real-valued submartingale $(f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$, denoting by $U_N(a, b)$ the
number of times $f_n$ crossed from below $a$ to above $b$ before time $N$, Doob's upcrossing
estimate (also known as Doob's inequality) states that
$$(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(f_N - a)^+].$$
Doob's upcrossing estimate is an important inequality and is central in proving the martingale
convergence theorems.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing above `b` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing below `a` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat a b f N`: is the predictable process which is 1 if `n` is
between a consecutive pair of lower and upper crossings and is 0 otherwise. Intuitively
one might think of the `upcrossingStrat` as the strategy of buying 1 share whenever the process
crosses below `a` for the first time after selling and selling 1 share whenever the process
crosses above `b` for the first time after buying.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore a b f N`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to
above `b` before time `N`.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossings a b f`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to above
`b`. This takes value in `ℝ≥0∞` and so is allowed to be `∞`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime`: `upperCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime`: `lowerCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part`: Doob's
upcrossing estimate.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part`: the inequality
obtained by taking the supremum on both sides of Doob's upcrossing estimate.
### References
We mostly follow the proof from [Kallenberg, *Foundations of modern probability*][kallenberg2021]
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
/-!
## Proof outline
In this section, we will denote by $U_N(a, b)$ the number of upcrossings of $(f_n)$ from below $a$
to above $b$ before time $N$.
To define $U_N(a, b)$, we will construct two stopping times corresponding to when $(f_n)$ crosses
below $a$ and above $b$. Namely, we define
$$
\sigma_n := \inf \{n \ge \tau_n \mid f_n \le a\} \wedge N;
$$
$$
\tau_{n + 1} := \inf \{n \ge \sigma_n \mid f_n \ge b\} \wedge N.
$$
These are `lowerCrossingTime` and `upperCrossingTime` in our formalization which are defined
using `MeasureTheory.hitting` allowing us to specify a starting and ending time.
Then, we may simply define $U_N(a, b) := \sup \{n \mid \tau_n < N\}$.
Fixing $a < b \in \mathbb{R}$, we will first prove the theorem in the special case that
$0 \le f_0$ and $a \le f_N$. In particular, we will show
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This is `MeasureTheory.integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral` in our formalization.
To prove this, we use the fact that given a non-negative, bounded, predictable process $(C_n)$
(i.e. $(C_{n + 1})$ is adapted), $(C \bullet f)_n := \sum_{k \le n} C_{k + 1}(f_{k + 1} - f_k)$ is
a submartingale if $(f_n)$ is.
Define $C_n := \sum_{k \le n} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)$. It is easy to see that
$(1 - C_n)$ is non-negative, bounded and predictable, and hence, given a submartingale $(f_n)$,
$(1 - C) \bullet f$ is also a submartingale. Thus, by the submartingale property,
$0 \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_0] \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_N]$ implying
$$
\mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N] \le \mathbb{E}[(1 \bullet f)_N] = \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0].
$$
Furthermore,
\begin{align}
(C \bullet f)_N & =
\sum_{n \le N} \sum_{k \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} \sum_{n \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\sigma_k + 1} - f_{\sigma_k} + f_{\sigma_k + 2} - f_{\sigma_k + 1}
+ \cdots + f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\tau_{k + 1} - 1})\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k})
\ge \sum_{k < U_N(a, b)} (b - a) = (b - a) U_N(a, b)
\end{align}
where the inequality follows since for all $k < U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k} \ge b - a$ while for all $k > U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} = f_{\sigma_k} = f_N$ and
$f_{\tau_{U_N(a, b) + 1}} - f_{\sigma_{U_N(a, b)}} = f_N - a \ge 0$. Hence, we have
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N]
\le \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N],
$$
as required.
To obtain the general case, we simply apply the above to $((f_n - a)^+)_n$.
-/
/-- `lowerCrossingTimeAux a f c N` is the first time `f` reached below `a` after time `c` before
time `N`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTimeAux [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (a : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ) (c N : ι) :
Ω → ι :=
hitting f (Set.Iic a) c N
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_aux MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTimeAux
/-- `upperCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
above `b` after `f` reached below `a` for the `n - 1`-th time. -/
noncomputable def upperCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) : ℕ → Ω → ι
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => fun ω =>
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime
/-- `lowerCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
below `a` after `f` reached above `b` for the `n`-th time. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ι := fun ω => hitting f (Set.Iic a) (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime
section
variable [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero : upperCrossingTime a b f N 0 = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_zero MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_zero
@[simp]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_zero : lowerCrossingTime a b f N 0 = hitting f (Set.Iic a) ⊥ N :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_zero MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_zero
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime]
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_succ MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_succ
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ_eq (ω : Ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω := by
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ]
rfl
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_succ_eq MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_succ_eq
end
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem upperCrossingTime_le : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
cases n
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_le, Nat.zero_eq]
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ, hitting_le]
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_le MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_le
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero' : upperCrossingTime a b f ⊥ n ω = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 upperCrossingTime_le
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_zero' MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_zero'
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le ω]
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_le MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_le
theorem upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, le_hitting upperCrossingTime_le ω]
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_le_lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ]
exact le_hitting lowerCrossingTime_le ω
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_le_upper_crossing_time_succ MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
theorem lowerCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_mono MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_mono
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Upcrossing.lean | 219 | 223 | theorem upperCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by |
suffices Monotone fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Range
#align_import data.multiset.nodup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# The `Nodup` predicate for multisets without duplicate elements.
-/
namespace Multiset
open Function List
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
-- nodup
/-- `Nodup s` means that `s` has no duplicates, i.e. the multiplicity of
any element is at most 1. -/
def Nodup (s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.Nodup fun _ _ p => propext p.nodup_iff
#align multiset.nodup Multiset.Nodup
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodup {l : List α} : @Nodup α l ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_nodup Multiset.coe_nodup
@[simp]
theorem nodup_zero : @Nodup α 0 :=
Pairwise.nil
#align multiset.nodup_zero Multiset.nodup_zero
@[simp]
theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : Nodup (a ::ₘ s) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Nodup s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.nodup_cons
#align multiset.nodup_cons Multiset.nodup_cons
theorem Nodup.cons (m : a ∉ s) (n : Nodup s) : Nodup (a ::ₘ s) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
#align multiset.nodup.cons Multiset.Nodup.cons
@[simp]
theorem nodup_singleton : ∀ a : α, Nodup ({a} : Multiset α) :=
List.nodup_singleton
#align multiset.nodup_singleton Multiset.nodup_singleton
theorem Nodup.of_cons (h : Nodup (a ::ₘ s)) : Nodup s :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
#align multiset.nodup.of_cons Multiset.Nodup.of_cons
theorem Nodup.not_mem (h : Nodup (a ::ₘ s)) : a ∉ s :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
#align multiset.nodup.not_mem Multiset.Nodup.not_mem
theorem nodup_of_le {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : Nodup t → Nodup s :=
Multiset.leInductionOn h fun {_ _} => Nodup.sublist
#align multiset.nodup_of_le Multiset.nodup_of_le
theorem not_nodup_pair : ∀ a : α, ¬Nodup (a ::ₘ a ::ₘ 0) :=
List.not_nodup_pair
#align multiset.not_nodup_pair Multiset.not_nodup_pair
theorem nodup_iff_le {s : Multiset α} : Nodup s ↔ ∀ a : α, ¬a ::ₘ a ::ₘ 0 ≤ s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ =>
nodup_iff_sublist.trans <| forall_congr' fun a => not_congr (@replicate_le_coe _ a 2 _).symm
#align multiset.nodup_iff_le Multiset.nodup_iff_le
theorem nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons {s : Multiset α} : s.Nodup ↔ ∀ a t, s ≠ a ::ₘ a ::ₘ t :=
nodup_iff_le.trans
⟨fun h a t s_eq => h a (s_eq.symm ▸ cons_le_cons a (cons_le_cons a (zero_le _))), fun h a le =>
let ⟨t, s_eq⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp le
h a t (by rwa [cons_add, cons_add, zero_add] at s_eq)⟩
#align multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons Multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α} : Nodup s ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ 1 :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_nodup, mem_coe, coe_count]
exact List.nodup_iff_count_le_one
#align multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one Multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one
theorem nodup_iff_count_eq_one [DecidableEq α] : Nodup s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, count a s = 1 :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _l => by simpa using List.nodup_iff_count_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (d : Nodup s) (h : a ∈ s) :
count a s = 1 :=
nodup_iff_count_eq_one.mp d a h
#align multiset.count_eq_one_of_mem Multiset.count_eq_one_of_mem
theorem count_eq_of_nodup [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (d : Nodup s) :
count a s = if a ∈ s then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_eq_one_of_mem d h
· exact count_eq_zero_of_not_mem h
#align multiset.count_eq_of_nodup Multiset.count_eq_of_nodup
theorem nodup_iff_pairwise {α} {s : Multiset α} : Nodup s ↔ Pairwise (· ≠ ·) s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun _ => (pairwise_coe_iff_pairwise fun _ _ => Ne.symm).symm
#align multiset.nodup_iff_pairwise Multiset.nodup_iff_pairwise
protected theorem Nodup.pairwise : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, a ≠ b → r a b) → Nodup s → Pairwise r s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l h hl => ⟨l, rfl, hl.imp_of_mem fun {a b} ha hb => h a ha b hb⟩
#align multiset.nodup.pairwise Multiset.Nodup.pairwise
theorem Pairwise.forall (H : Symmetric r) (hs : Pairwise r s) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a ≠ b → r a b :=
let ⟨_, hl₁, hl₂⟩ := hs
hl₁.symm ▸ hl₂.forall H
#align multiset.pairwise.forall Multiset.Pairwise.forall
theorem nodup_add {s t : Multiset α} : Nodup (s + t) ↔ Nodup s ∧ Nodup t ∧ Disjoint s t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t fun _ _ => nodup_append
#align multiset.nodup_add Multiset.nodup_add
theorem disjoint_of_nodup_add {s t : Multiset α} (d : Nodup (s + t)) : Disjoint s t :=
(nodup_add.1 d).2.2
#align multiset.disjoint_of_nodup_add Multiset.disjoint_of_nodup_add
theorem Nodup.add_iff (d₁ : Nodup s) (d₂ : Nodup t) : Nodup (s + t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp [nodup_add, d₁, d₂]
#align multiset.nodup.add_iff Multiset.Nodup.add_iff
theorem Nodup.of_map (f : α → β) : Nodup (map f s) → Nodup s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.Nodup.of_map f
#align multiset.nodup.of_map Multiset.Nodup.of_map
theorem Nodup.map_on {f : α → β} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) → Nodup s → Nodup (map f s) :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.Nodup.map_on
#align multiset.nodup.map_on Multiset.Nodup.map_on
theorem Nodup.map {f : α → β} {s : Multiset α} (hf : Injective f) : Nodup s → Nodup (map f s) :=
Nodup.map_on fun _ _ _ _ h => hf h
#align multiset.nodup.map Multiset.Nodup.map
theorem nodup_map_iff_of_inj_on {f : α → β} (d : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
Nodup (map f s) ↔ Nodup s :=
⟨Nodup.of_map _, fun h => h.map_on d⟩
theorem nodup_map_iff_of_injective {f : α → β} (d : Function.Injective f) :
Nodup (map f s) ↔ Nodup s :=
⟨Nodup.of_map _, fun h => h.map d⟩
theorem inj_on_of_nodup_map {f : α → β} {s : Multiset α} :
Nodup (map f s) → ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.inj_on_of_nodup_map
#align multiset.inj_on_of_nodup_map Multiset.inj_on_of_nodup_map
theorem nodup_map_iff_inj_on {f : α → β} {s : Multiset α} (d : Nodup s) :
Nodup (map f s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y :=
⟨inj_on_of_nodup_map, fun h => d.map_on h⟩
#align multiset.nodup_map_iff_inj_on Multiset.nodup_map_iff_inj_on
theorem Nodup.filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] {s} : Nodup s → Nodup (filter p s) :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.Nodup.filter (p ·)
#align multiset.nodup.filter Multiset.Nodup.filter
@[simp]
theorem nodup_attach {s : Multiset α} : Nodup (attach s) ↔ Nodup s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.nodup_attach
#align multiset.nodup_attach Multiset.nodup_attach
protected alias ⟨_, Nodup.attach⟩ := nodup_attach
theorem Nodup.pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {s : Multiset α} {H}
(hf : ∀ a ha b hb, f a ha = f b hb → a = b) : Nodup s → Nodup (pmap f s H) :=
Quot.induction_on s (fun _ _ => List.Nodup.pmap hf) H
#align multiset.nodup.pmap Multiset.Nodup.pmap
instance nodupDecidable [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) : Decidable (Nodup s) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton s fun l => l.nodupDecidable
#align multiset.nodup_decidable Multiset.nodupDecidable
theorem Nodup.erase_eq_filter [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {s} :
Nodup s → s.erase a = Multiset.filter (· ≠ a) s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ d =>
congr_arg ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) <| List.Nodup.erase_eq_filter d a
#align multiset.nodup.erase_eq_filter Multiset.Nodup.erase_eq_filter
theorem Nodup.erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {l} : Nodup l → Nodup (l.erase a) :=
nodup_of_le (erase_le _ _)
#align multiset.nodup.erase Multiset.Nodup.erase
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Nodup.lean | 190 | 192 | theorem Nodup.mem_erase_iff [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} {l} (d : Nodup l) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by |
rw [d.erase_eq_filter b, mem_filter, and_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LocallyConvex
#align_import analysis.locally_convex.with_seminorms from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b31173ee05c911d61ad6a05bd2196835c932e0ec"
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `SeminormFamily.basisSets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `Seminorm.IsBounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
* `WithSeminorms.firstCountable`: A space is first countable if it's topology is induced by a
countable family of seminorms.
## Continuity of semilinear maps
If `E` and `F` are topological vector space with the topology induced by a family of seminorms, then
we have a direct method to prove that a linear map is continuous:
* `Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
If the topology of a space `E` is induced by a family of seminorms, then we can characterize von
Neumann boundedness in terms of that seminorm family. Together with
`LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded` this gives general criterion for continuity.
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open NormedField Set Seminorm TopologicalSpace Filter List
open NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕝 𝕝₂ E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section FilterBasis
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbrev SeminormFamily :=
ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E
#align seminorm_family SeminormFamily
variable {𝕜 E ι}
namespace SeminormFamily
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basisSets (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : Set (Set E) :=
⋃ (s : Finset ι) (r) (_ : 0 < r), singleton (ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r)
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets SeminormFamily.basisSets
variable (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
theorem basisSets_iff {U : Set E} :
U ∈ p.basisSets ↔ ∃ (i : Finset ι) (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r := by
simp only [basisSets, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_iff SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff
theorem basisSets_mem (i : Finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨i, _, hr, rfl⟩
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_mem SeminormFamily.basisSets_mem
theorem basisSets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i}, _, hr, by rw [Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_singleton_mem SeminormFamily.basisSets_singleton_mem
theorem basisSets_nonempty [Nonempty ι] : p.basisSets.Nonempty := by
let i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, ?_⟩
exact p.basisSets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_nonempty SeminormFamily.basisSets_nonempty
theorem basisSets_intersect (U V : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) (hV : V ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ z ∈ p.basisSets, z ⊆ U ∩ V := by
classical
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), ?_⟩
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₂]
exact
Set.subset_inter
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_left hi, ball_mono <| min_le_left _ _⟩)
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_right hi, ball_mono <| min_le_right _ _⟩)
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_intersect SeminormFamily.basisSets_intersect
theorem basisSets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : (0 : E) ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero]
exact hr
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_zero SeminormFamily.basisSets_zero
theorem basisSets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V + V ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / 2)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r / 2) (r / 2) 0 0) ?_
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves']
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_add SeminormFamily.basisSets_add
theorem basisSets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V ⊆ (fun x : E => -x) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, _, hU⟩
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero]
exact ⟨U, hU', Eq.subset hU⟩
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_neg SeminormFamily.basisSets_neg
/-- The `addGroupFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def addGroupFilterBasis [Nonempty ι] : AddGroupFilterBasis E :=
addGroupFilterBasisOfComm p.basisSets p.basisSets_nonempty p.basisSets_intersect p.basisSets_zero
p.basisSets_add p.basisSets_neg
#align seminorm_family.add_group_filter_basis SeminormFamily.addGroupFilterBasis
theorem basisSets_smul_right (v : E) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∀ᶠ x : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, Filter.eventually_iff]
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v
· simp_rw [(lt_div_iff h).symm]
rw [← _root_.ball_zero_eq]
exact Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h)
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) (apply_nonneg _ v), mul_zero, hr]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ (mem_univ 0)
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_smul_right SeminormFamily.basisSets_smul_right
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem basisSets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), ∃ W ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V • W ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
refine ⟨Metric.ball 0 √r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 √r, p.basisSets_mem s (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) √r √r) ?_
rw [hU, Real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)]
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_smul SeminormFamily.basisSets_smul
theorem basisSets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V ⊆ (fun y : E => x • y) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU]
by_cases h : x ≠ 0
· rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero]
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ‖x‖)
exact ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), Subset.rfl⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_mem s hr, ?_⟩
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, Set.subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero, imp_true_iff,
preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul]
#align seminorm_family.basis_sets_smul_left SeminormFamily.basisSets_smul_left
/-- The `moduleFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def moduleFilterBasis : ModuleFilterBasis 𝕜 E where
toAddGroupFilterBasis := p.addGroupFilterBasis
smul' := p.basisSets_smul _
smul_left' := p.basisSets_smul_left
smul_right' := p.basisSets_smul_right
#align seminorm_family.module_filter_basis SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis
theorem filter_eq_iInf (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i => ?_) ?_
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.le_basis_iff
(Metric.nhds_basis_ball.comap _)]
intro ε hε
refine ⟨(p i).ball 0 ε, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← (Finset.sup_singleton : _ = p i)]
exact p.basisSets_mem {i} hε
· rw [id, (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball]
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.ge_iff]
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [id, Seminorm.ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, s.iInter_mem_sets]
exact fun i _ =>
Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem i
⟨Metric.ball 0 r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 hr,
Eq.subset (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball.symm⟩
#align seminorm_family.filter_eq_infi SeminormFamily.filter_eq_iInf
end SeminormFamily
end FilterBasis
section Bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
-- Todo: This should be phrased entirely in terms of the von Neumann bornology.
/-- The proposition that a linear map is bounded between spaces with families of seminorms. -/
def IsBounded (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : Prop :=
∀ i, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p
#align seminorm.is_bounded Seminorm.IsBounded
theorem isBounded_const (ι' : Type*) [Nonempty ι'] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
IsBounded p (fun _ : ι' => q) f ↔ ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), q.comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
simp only [IsBounded, forall_const]
#align seminorm.is_bounded_const Seminorm.isBounded_const
theorem const_isBounded (ι : Type*) [Nonempty ι] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : IsBounded (fun _ : ι => p) q f ↔ ∀ i, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • p := by
constructor <;> intro h i
· rcases h i with ⟨s, C, h⟩
exact ⟨C, le_trans h (smul_le_smul (Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) le_rfl)⟩
use {Classical.arbitrary ι}
simp only [h, Finset.sup_singleton]
#align seminorm.const_is_bounded Seminorm.const_isBounded
theorem isBounded_sup {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F} {f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F}
(hf : IsBounded p q f) (s' : Finset ι') :
∃ (C : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset ι), (s'.sup q).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
classical
obtain rfl | _ := s'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨1, ∅, by simp [Seminorm.bot_eq_zero]⟩
choose fₛ fC hf using hf
use s'.card • s'.sup fC, Finset.biUnion s' fₛ
have hs : ∀ i : ι', i ∈ s' → (q i).comp f ≤ s'.sup fC • (Finset.biUnion s' fₛ).sup p := by
intro i hi
refine (hf i).trans (smul_le_smul ?_ (Finset.le_sup hi))
exact Finset.sup_mono (Finset.subset_biUnion_of_mem fₛ hi)
refine (comp_mono f (finset_sup_le_sum q s')).trans ?_
simp_rw [← pullback_apply, map_sum, pullback_apply]
refine (Finset.sum_le_sum hs).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_assoc]
#align seminorm.is_bounded_sup Seminorm.isBounded_sup
end Seminorm
end Bounded
section Topology
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
/-- The proposition that the topology of `E` is induced by a family of seminorms `p`. -/
structure WithSeminorms (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) [topology : TopologicalSpace E] : Prop where
topology_eq_withSeminorms : topology = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology
#align with_seminorms WithSeminorms
theorem WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [t : TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) : t = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology :=
hp.1
#align with_seminorms.with_seminorms_eq WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
theorem WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup (hp : WithSeminorms p) : TopologicalAddGroup E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup _
#align with_seminorms.topological_add_group WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup
theorem WithSeminorms.continuousSMul (hp : WithSeminorms p) : ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact ModuleFilterBasis.continuousSMul _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id := by
rw [congr_fun (congr_arg (@nhds E) hp.1) 0]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis _
#align with_seminorms.has_basis WithSeminorms.hasBasis
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball 0 sr.2 := by
refine ⟨fun V => ?_⟩
simp only [hp.hasBasis.mem_iff, SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff, Prod.exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
exact ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
· rintro ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
#align with_seminorms.has_basis_zero_ball WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) {x : E} :
(𝓝 (x : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball x sr.2 := by
have : TopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [← map_add_left_nhds_zero]
convert hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.map (x + ·) using 1
ext sr : 1
-- Porting note: extra type ascriptions needed on `0`
have : (sr.fst.sup p).ball (x +ᵥ (0 : E)) sr.snd = x +ᵥ (sr.fst.sup p).ball 0 sr.snd :=
Eq.symm (Seminorm.vadd_ball (sr.fst.sup p))
rwa [vadd_eq_add, add_zero] at this
#align with_seminorms.has_basis_ball WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball
/-- The `x`-neighbourhoods of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around `x`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (U : Set E) :
U ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
rw [hp.hasBasis_ball.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
#align with_seminorms.mem_nhds_iff WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff
/-- The open sets of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around all of their points. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls (hp : WithSeminorms p) (U : Set E) :
IsOpen U ↔ ∀ x ∈ U, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
simp_rw [← WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff hp _ U, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
#align with_seminorms.is_open_iff_mem_balls WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls
/- Note that through the following lemmas, one also immediately has that separating families
of seminorms induce T₂ and T₃ topologies by `TopologicalAddGroup.t2Space`
and `TopologicalAddGroup.t3Space` -/
/-- A separating family of seminorms induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(h : ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) : T1Space E := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
refine TopologicalAddGroup.t1Space _ ?_
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, hp.isOpen_iff_mem_balls]
rintro x (hx : x ≠ 0)
cases' h x hx with i pi_nonzero
refine ⟨{i}, p i x, by positivity, subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_singleton, mem_ball, zero_sub, map_neg_eq_map, not_lt]
#align with_seminorms.t1_of_separating WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating
/-- A family of seminorms inducing a T₁ topology is separating. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/WithSeminorms.lean | 350 | 357 | theorem WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 [T1Space E] (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ i, p i x ≠ 0 := by |
have := ((t1Space_TFAE E).out 0 9).mp (inferInstanceAs <| T1Space E)
by_contra! h
refine hx (this ?_)
rw [hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.specializes_iff]
rintro ⟨s, r⟩ (hr : 0 < r)
simp only [ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball_zero, h, hr, forall_true_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.KernelPair
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Over
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.diagonal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f6bab67886fb92c3e2f539cc90a83815f69a189d"
/-!
# The diagonal object of a morphism.
We provide various API and isomorphisms considering the diagonal object `Δ_{Y/X} := pullback f f`
of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`.
-/
open CategoryTheory
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace pullback
section Diagonal
variable (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasPullback f f]
/-- The diagonal object of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` is `Δ_{X/Y} := pullback f f`. -/
abbrev diagonalObj : C :=
pullback f f
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_obj CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonalObj
/-- The diagonal morphism `X ⟶ Δ_{X/Y}` for a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
def diagonal : X ⟶ diagonalObj f :=
pullback.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem diagonal_fst : diagonal f ≫ pullback.fst = 𝟙 _ :=
pullback.lift_fst _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem diagonal_snd : diagonal f ≫ pullback.snd = 𝟙 _ :=
pullback.lift_snd _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_snd
instance : IsSplitMono (diagonal f) :=
⟨⟨⟨pullback.fst, diagonal_fst f⟩⟩⟩
instance : IsSplitEpi (pullback.fst : pullback f f ⟶ X) :=
⟨⟨⟨diagonal f, diagonal_fst f⟩⟩⟩
instance : IsSplitEpi (pullback.snd : pullback f f ⟶ X) :=
⟨⟨⟨diagonal f, diagonal_snd f⟩⟩⟩
instance [Mono f] : IsIso (diagonal f) := by
rw [(IsIso.inv_eq_of_inv_hom_id (diagonal_fst f)).symm]
infer_instance
/-- The two projections `Δ_{X/Y} ⟶ X` form a kernel pair for `f : X ⟶ Y`. -/
theorem diagonal_isKernelPair : IsKernelPair f (pullback.fst : diagonalObj f ⟶ _) pullback.snd :=
IsPullback.of_hasPullback f f
#align category_theory.limits.pullback.diagonal_is_kernel_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback.diagonal_isKernelPair
end Diagonal
end pullback
variable [HasPullbacks C]
open pullback
section
variable {U V₁ V₂ : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : U ⟶ Y)
variable (i₁ : V₁ ⟶ pullback f i) (i₂ : V₂ ⟶ pullback f i)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst :
(pullback.snd :
pullback (diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i (by simp [condition])
(by simp [condition])) ⟶
_) ≫
fst ≫ i₁ ≫ fst =
pullback.fst := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.fst]
rw [← diagonal_fst f, pullback.condition_assoc, pullback.lift_fst]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst :
(pullback.snd :
pullback (diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i (by simp [condition])
(by simp [condition])) ⟶
_) ≫
snd ≫ i₂ ≫ fst =
pullback.fst := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.fst]
rw [← diagonal_snd f, pullback.condition_assoc, pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst
variable [HasPullback i₁ i₂]
set_option maxHeartbeats 400000 in
/-- This iso witnesses the fact that
given `f : X ⟶ Y`, `i : U ⟶ Y`, and `i₁ : V₁ ⟶ X ×[Y] U`, `i₂ : V₂ ⟶ X ×[Y] U`, the diagram
V₁ ×[X ×[Y] U] V₂ ⟶ V₁ ×[U] V₂
| |
| |
↓ ↓
X ⟶ X ×[Y] X
is a pullback square.
Also see `pullback_fst_map_snd_isPullback`.
-/
def pullbackDiagonalMapIso :
pullback (diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i
(by simp only [Category.assoc, condition])
(by simp only [Category.assoc, condition])) ≅
pullback i₁ i₂ where
hom :=
pullback.lift (pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst) (pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd) (by
ext
· simp [Category.assoc, pullback_diagonal_map_snd_fst_fst, pullback_diagonal_map_snd_snd_fst]
· simp [Category.assoc, pullback.condition, pullback.condition_assoc])
inv :=
pullback.lift (pullback.fst ≫ i₁ ≫ pullback.fst)
(pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) pullback.snd (Category.id_comp _).symm
(Category.id_comp _).symm) (by
ext
· simp only [Category.assoc, diagonal_fst, Category.comp_id, limit.lift_π,
PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, limit.lift_π_assoc, cospan_left]
· simp only [condition_assoc, Category.assoc, diagonal_snd, Category.comp_id,
limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
limit.lift_π_assoc, cospan_right])
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_hom_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_hom_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ i₁ ≫ pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_inv_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_iso_inv_snd_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_snd_snd
theorem pullback_fst_map_snd_isPullback :
IsPullback (fst ≫ i₁ ≫ fst)
(map i₁ i₂ (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) _ _ _ (Category.id_comp _).symm (Category.id_comp _).symm)
(diagonal f)
(map (i₁ ≫ snd) (i₂ ≫ snd) f f (i₁ ≫ fst) (i₂ ≫ fst) i (by simp [condition])
(by simp [condition])) :=
IsPullback.of_iso_pullback ⟨by ext <;> simp [condition_assoc]⟩
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso f i i₁ i₂).symm (pullbackDiagonalMapIso_inv_fst f i i₁ i₂)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_fst_map_snd_is_pullback CategoryTheory.Limits.pullback_fst_map_snd_isPullback
end
section
variable {S T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (i : T ⟶ S)
variable [HasPullback i i] [HasPullback f g] [HasPullback (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i)]
variable
[HasPullback (diagonal i)
(pullback.map (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) i i f g (𝟙 _) (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _))]
/-- This iso witnesses the fact that
given `f : X ⟶ T`, `g : Y ⟶ T`, and `i : T ⟶ S`, the diagram
X ×ₜ Y ⟶ X ×ₛ Y
| |
| |
↓ ↓
T ⟶ T ×ₛ T
is a pullback square.
Also see `pullback_map_diagonal_isPullback`.
-/
def pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso :
pullback (diagonal i)
(pullback.map (f ≫ i) (g ≫ i) i i f g (𝟙 _) (Category.comp_id _) (Category.comp_id _)) ≅
pullback f g := by
refine ?_ ≪≫
pullbackDiagonalMapIso i (𝟙 _) (f ≫ inv pullback.fst) (g ≫ inv pullback.fst) ≪≫ ?_
· refine @asIso _ _ _ _ (pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 T) ((pullback.congrHom ?_ ?_).hom) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_)
?_
· rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← condition, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← condition, Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
· ext <;> simp
· infer_instance
· refine @asIso _ _ _ _ (pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) pullback.fst ?_ ?_) ?_
· rw [Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
· rw [Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
· infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).hom ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_hom_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).hom ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd := by
delta pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_hom_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_hom_snd
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ f := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, ← Category.comp_id pullback.fst, ← diagonal_fst i, pullback.condition_assoc]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_inv_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_fst :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_inv_snd_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_fst
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_snd :
(pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f g i).inv ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.pullback_diagonal_map_id_iso_inv_snd_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso_inv_snd_snd
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Diagonal.lean | 272 | 275 | theorem pullback.diagonal_comp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [HasPullback f f] [HasPullback g g]
[HasPullback (f ≫ g) (f ≫ g)] :
diagonal (f ≫ g) = diagonal f ≫ (pullbackDiagonalMapIdIso f f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd := by |
ext <;> simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
#align_import order.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6623e6af705e97002a9054c1c05a980180276fc1"
/-!
# Order intervals
This file defines (nonempty) closed intervals in an order (see `Set.Icc`). This is a prototype for
interval arithmetic.
## Main declarations
* `NonemptyInterval`: Nonempty intervals. Pairs where the second element is greater than the first.
* `Interval`: Intervals. Either `∅` or a nonempty interval.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-- The nonempty closed intervals in an order.
We define intervals by the pair of endpoints `fst`, `snd`. To convert intervals to the set of
elements between these endpoints, use the coercion `NonemptyInterval α → Set α`. -/
@[ext (flat := false)]
structure NonemptyInterval (α : Type*) [LE α] extends Prod α α where
/-- The starting point of an interval is smaller than the endpoint. -/
fst_le_snd : fst ≤ snd
#align nonempty_interval NonemptyInterval
#align nonempty_interval.ext NonemptyInterval.ext
#align nonempty_interval.ext_iff NonemptyInterval.ext_iff
namespace NonemptyInterval
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : NonemptyInterval α}
theorem toProd_injective : Injective (toProd : NonemptyInterval α → α × α) :=
fun s t h => by cases s; cases t; congr
#align nonempty_interval.to_prod_injective NonemptyInterval.toProd_injective
/-- The injection that induces the order on intervals. -/
def toDualProd : NonemptyInterval α → αᵒᵈ × α :=
toProd
#align nonempty_interval.to_dual_prod NonemptyInterval.toDualProd
@[simp]
theorem toDualProd_apply (s : NonemptyInterval α) : s.toDualProd = (toDual s.fst, s.snd) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.to_dual_prod_apply NonemptyInterval.toDualProd_apply
theorem toDualProd_injective : Injective (toDualProd : NonemptyInterval α → αᵒᵈ × α) :=
toProd_injective
#align nonempty_interval.to_dual_prod_injective NonemptyInterval.toDualProd_injective
instance [IsEmpty α] : IsEmpty (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s => isEmptyElim s.fst⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (NonemptyInterval α) :=
toDualProd_injective.subsingleton
instance le : LE (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s t => t.fst ≤ s.fst ∧ s.snd ≤ t.snd⟩
theorem le_def : s ≤ t ↔ t.fst ≤ s.fst ∧ s.snd ≤ t.snd :=
Iff.rfl
#align nonempty_interval.le_def NonemptyInterval.le_def
/-- `toDualProd` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps]
def toDualProdHom : NonemptyInterval α ↪o αᵒᵈ × α where
toFun := toDualProd
inj' := toDualProd_injective
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align nonempty_interval.to_dual_prod_hom NonemptyInterval.toDualProdHom
/-- Turn an interval into an interval in the dual order. -/
def dual : NonemptyInterval α ≃ NonemptyInterval αᵒᵈ where
toFun s := ⟨s.toProd.swap, s.fst_le_snd⟩
invFun s := ⟨s.toProd.swap, s.fst_le_snd⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align nonempty_interval.dual NonemptyInterval.dual
@[simp]
theorem fst_dual (s : NonemptyInterval α) : s.dual.fst = toDual s.snd :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.fst_dual NonemptyInterval.fst_dual
@[simp]
theorem snd_dual (s : NonemptyInterval α) : s.dual.snd = toDual s.fst :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.snd_dual NonemptyInterval.snd_dual
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ] [Preorder δ] {s : NonemptyInterval α} {x : α × α}
{a : α}
instance : Preorder (NonemptyInterval α) :=
Preorder.lift toDualProd
instance : Coe (NonemptyInterval α) (Set α) :=
⟨fun s => Icc s.fst s.snd⟩
instance (priority := 100) : Membership α (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ (s : Set α)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {hx : x.1 ≤ x.2} : a ∈ mk x hx ↔ x.1 ≤ a ∧ a ≤ x.2 :=
Iff.rfl
#align nonempty_interval.mem_mk NonemptyInterval.mem_mk
theorem mem_def : a ∈ s ↔ s.fst ≤ a ∧ a ≤ s.snd :=
Iff.rfl
#align nonempty_interval.mem_def NonemptyInterval.mem_def
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem coe_nonempty (s : NonemptyInterval α) : (s : Set α).Nonempty :=
nonempty_Icc.2 s.fst_le_snd
#align nonempty_interval.coe_nonempty NonemptyInterval.coe_nonempty
/-- `{a}` as an interval. -/
@[simps]
def pure (a : α) : NonemptyInterval α :=
⟨⟨a, a⟩, le_rfl⟩
#align nonempty_interval.pure NonemptyInterval.pure
theorem mem_pure_self (a : α) : a ∈ pure a :=
⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
#align nonempty_interval.mem_pure_self NonemptyInterval.mem_pure_self
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → NonemptyInterval α) := fun _ _ =>
congr_arg <| Prod.fst ∘ toProd
#align nonempty_interval.pure_injective NonemptyInterval.pure_injective
@[simp]
theorem dual_pure (a : α) : dual (pure a) = pure (toDual a) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.dual_pure NonemptyInterval.dual_pure
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨pure default⟩
instance [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (NonemptyInterval α) :=
Nonempty.map pure (by infer_instance)
instance [Nontrivial α] : Nontrivial (NonemptyInterval α) :=
pure_injective.nontrivial
/-- Pushforward of nonempty intervals. -/
@[simps!]
def map (f : α →o β) (a : NonemptyInterval α) : NonemptyInterval β :=
⟨a.toProd.map f f, f.mono a.fst_le_snd⟩
#align nonempty_interval.map NonemptyInterval.map
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α →o β) (a : α) : (pure a).map f = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.map_pure NonemptyInterval.map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β →o γ) (f : α →o β) (a : NonemptyInterval α) :
(a.map f).map g = a.map (g.comp f) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.map_map NonemptyInterval.map_map
@[simp]
theorem dual_map (f : α →o β) (a : NonemptyInterval α) :
dual (a.map f) = a.dual.map (OrderHom.dual f) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.dual_map NonemptyInterval.dual_map
/-- Binary pushforward of nonempty intervals. -/
@[simps]
def map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (h₀ : ∀ b, Monotone fun a => f a b) (h₁ : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) :
NonemptyInterval α → NonemptyInterval β → NonemptyInterval γ := fun s t =>
⟨(f s.fst t.fst, f s.snd t.snd), (h₀ _ s.fst_le_snd).trans <| h₁ _ t.fst_le_snd⟩
#align nonempty_interval.map₂ NonemptyInterval.map₂
@[simp]
theorem map₂_pure (f : α → β → γ) (h₀ h₁) (a : α) (b : β) :
map₂ f h₀ h₁ (pure a) (pure b) = pure (f a b) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.map₂_pure NonemptyInterval.map₂_pure
@[simp]
theorem dual_map₂ (f : α → β → γ) (h₀ h₁ s t) :
dual (map₂ f h₀ h₁ s t) =
map₂ (fun a b => toDual <| f (ofDual a) <| ofDual b) (fun _ => (h₀ _).dual)
(fun _ => (h₁ _).dual) (dual s) (dual t) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.dual_map₂ NonemptyInterval.dual_map₂
variable [BoundedOrder α]
instance : OrderTop (NonemptyInterval α) where
top := ⟨⟨⊥, ⊤⟩, bot_le⟩
le_top _ := ⟨bot_le, le_top⟩
@[simp]
theorem dual_top : dual (⊤ : NonemptyInterval α) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.dual_top NonemptyInterval.dual_top
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {s t : NonemptyInterval α} {x : α × α} {a b : α}
instance : PartialOrder (NonemptyInterval α) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ toDualProd_injective
/-- Consider a nonempty interval `[a, b]` as the set `[a, b]`. -/
def coeHom : NonemptyInterval α ↪o Set α :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun s => Icc s.fst s.snd) fun s _ => Icc_subset_Icc_iff s.fst_le_snd
#align nonempty_interval.coe_hom NonemptyInterval.coeHom
instance setLike : SetLike (NonemptyInterval α) α where
coe s := Icc s.fst s.snd
coe_injective' := coeHom.injective
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp, norm_cast] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ (s : NonemptyInterval α) ≤ t :=
(@coeHom α _).le_iff_le
#align nonempty_interval.coe_subset_coe NonemptyInterval.coe_subset_coe
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp, norm_cast] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ s < t :=
(@coeHom α _).lt_iff_lt
#align nonempty_interval.coe_ssubset_coe NonemptyInterval.coe_ssubset_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : NonemptyInterval α → Set α) = ((↑) : NonemptyInterval α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.coe_coe_hom NonemptyInterval.coe_coeHom
theorem coe_def (s : NonemptyInterval α) : (s : Set α) = Set.Icc s.toProd.1 s.toProd.2 := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pure (a : α) : (pure a : Set α) = {a} :=
Icc_self _
#align nonempty_interval.coe_pure NonemptyInterval.coe_pure
@[simp]
theorem mem_pure : b ∈ pure a ↔ b = a := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_pure, mem_singleton_iff]
#align nonempty_interval.mem_pure NonemptyInterval.mem_pure
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top [BoundedOrder α] : ((⊤ : NonemptyInterval α) : Set α) = univ :=
Icc_bot_top
#align nonempty_interval.coe_top NonemptyInterval.coe_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_dual (s : NonemptyInterval α) : (dual s : Set αᵒᵈ) = ofDual ⁻¹' s :=
dual_Icc
#align nonempty_interval.coe_dual NonemptyInterval.coe_dual
theorem subset_coe_map (f : α →o β) (s : NonemptyInterval α) : f '' s ⊆ s.map f :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun _ ha => ⟨f.mono ha.1, f.mono ha.2⟩
#align nonempty_interval.subset_coe_map NonemptyInterval.subset_coe_map
end PartialOrder
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α]
instance : Sup (NonemptyInterval α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨⟨s.fst ⊓ t.fst, s.snd ⊔ t.snd⟩, inf_le_left.trans <| s.fst_le_snd.trans le_sup_left⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (NonemptyInterval α) :=
toDualProd_injective.semilatticeSup _ fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sup (s t : NonemptyInterval α) : (s ⊔ t).fst = s.fst ⊓ t.fst :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.fst_sup NonemptyInterval.fst_sup
@[simp]
theorem snd_sup (s t : NonemptyInterval α) : (s ⊔ t).snd = s.snd ⊔ t.snd :=
rfl
#align nonempty_interval.snd_sup NonemptyInterval.snd_sup
end Lattice
end NonemptyInterval
/-- The closed intervals in an order.
We represent intervals either as `⊥` or a nonempty interval given by its endpoints `fst`, `snd`.
To convert intervals to the set of elements between these endpoints, use the coercion
`Interval α → Set α`. -/
-- Porting note: added reducible, it seems to help with coercions
abbrev Interval (α : Type*) [LE α] :=
WithBot (NonemptyInterval α) -- deriving Inhabited, LE, OrderBot
#align interval Interval
namespace Interval
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Interval α}
-- Porting note: previously found using `deriving`
instance : Inhabited (Interval α) := WithBot.inhabited
instance : LE (Interval α) := WithBot.le
instance : OrderBot (Interval α) := WithBot.orderBot
instance : Coe (NonemptyInterval α) (Interval α) :=
WithBot.coe
instance canLift : CanLift (Interval α) (NonemptyInterval α) (↑) fun r => r ≠ ⊥ :=
WithBot.canLift
#align interval.can_lift Interval.canLift
/-- Recursor for `Interval` using the preferred forms `⊥` and `↑a`. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator, cases_eliminator]
def recBotCoe {C : Interval α → Sort*} (bot : C ⊥) (coe : ∀ a : NonemptyInterval α, C a) :
∀ n : Interval α, C n :=
WithBot.recBotCoe bot coe
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : NonemptyInterval α → Interval α) :=
WithBot.coe_injective
#align interval.coe_injective Interval.coe_injective
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp, norm_cast] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem coe_inj {s t : NonemptyInterval α} : (s : Interval α) = t ↔ s = t :=
WithBot.coe_inj
#align interval.coe_inj Interval.coe_inj
protected
theorem «forall» {p : Interval α → Prop} : (∀ s, p s) ↔ p ⊥ ∧ ∀ s : NonemptyInterval α, p s :=
Option.forall
#align interval.forall Interval.forall
protected
theorem «exists» {p : Interval α → Prop} : (∃ s, p s) ↔ p ⊥ ∨ ∃ s : NonemptyInterval α, p s :=
Option.exists
#align interval.exists Interval.exists
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Interval α) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Unique (Option _)
/-- Turn an interval into an interval in the dual order. -/
def dual : Interval α ≃ Interval αᵒᵈ :=
NonemptyInterval.dual.optionCongr
#align interval.dual Interval.dual
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] [Preorder γ]
instance : Preorder (Interval α) :=
WithBot.preorder
/-- `{a}` as an interval. -/
def pure (a : α) : Interval α :=
NonemptyInterval.pure a
#align interval.pure Interval.pure
theorem pure_injective : Injective (pure : α → Interval α) :=
coe_injective.comp NonemptyInterval.pure_injective
#align interval.pure_injective Interval.pure_injective
@[simp]
theorem dual_pure (a : α) : dual (pure a) = pure (toDual a) :=
rfl
#align interval.dual_pure Interval.dual_pure
@[simp]
theorem dual_bot : dual (⊥ : Interval α) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align interval.dual_bot Interval.dual_bot
@[simp]
theorem pure_ne_bot {a : α} : pure a ≠ ⊥ :=
WithBot.coe_ne_bot
#align interval.pure_ne_bot Interval.pure_ne_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_ne_pure {a : α} : ⊥ ≠ pure a :=
WithBot.bot_ne_coe
#align interval.bot_ne_pure Interval.bot_ne_pure
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Interval α) :=
Option.nontrivial
/-- Pushforward of intervals. -/
def map (f : α →o β) : Interval α → Interval β :=
WithBot.map (NonemptyInterval.map f)
#align interval.map Interval.map
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α →o β) (a : α) : (pure a).map f = pure (f a) :=
rfl
#align interval.map_pure Interval.map_pure
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β →o γ) (f : α →o β) (s : Interval α) : (s.map f).map g = s.map (g.comp f) :=
Option.map_map _ _ _
#align interval.map_map Interval.map_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Basic.lean | 420 | 423 | theorem dual_map (f : α →o β) (s : Interval α) : dual (s.map f) = s.dual.map (OrderHom.dual f) := by |
cases s
· rfl
· exact WithBot.map_comm rfl _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align_import category_theory.idempotents.karoubi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"200eda15d8ff5669854ff6bcc10aaf37cb70498f"
/-!
# The Karoubi envelope of a category
In this file, we define the Karoubi envelope `Karoubi C` of a category `C`.
## Main constructions and definitions
- `Karoubi C` is the Karoubi envelope of a category `C`: it is an idempotent
complete category. It is also preadditive when `C` is preadditive.
- `toKaroubi C : C ⥤ Karoubi C` is a fully faithful functor, which is an equivalence
(`toKaroubiIsEquivalence`) when `C` is idempotent complete.
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive CategoryTheory.Limits BigOperators
namespace CategoryTheory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
namespace Idempotents
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- In a preadditive category `C`, when an object `X` decomposes as `X ≅ P ⨿ Q`, one may
consider `P` as a direct factor of `X` and up to unique isomorphism, it is determined by the
obvious idempotent `X ⟶ P ⟶ X` which is the projection onto `P` with kernel `Q`. More generally,
one may define a formal direct factor of an object `X : C` : it consists of an idempotent
`p : X ⟶ X` which is thought as the "formal image" of `p`. The type `Karoubi C` shall be the
type of the objects of the karoubi envelope of `C`. It makes sense for any category `C`. -/
structure Karoubi where
/-- an object of the underlying category -/
X : C
/-- an endomorphism of the object -/
p : X ⟶ X
/-- the condition that the given endomorphism is an idempotent -/
idem : p ≫ p = p := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] idem
@[ext]
theorem ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (h_X : P.X = Q.X) (h_p : P.p ≫ eqToHom h_X = eqToHom h_X ≫ Q.p) :
P = Q := by
cases P
cases Q
dsimp at h_X h_p
subst h_X
simpa only [mk.injEq, heq_eq_eq, true_and, eqToHom_refl, comp_id, id_comp] using h_p
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.ext CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.ext
/-- A morphism `P ⟶ Q` in the category `Karoubi C` is a morphism in the underlying category
`C` which satisfies a relation, which in the preadditive case, expresses that it induces a
map between the corresponding "formal direct factors" and that it vanishes on the complement
formal direct factor. -/
@[ext]
structure Hom (P Q : Karoubi C) where
/-- a morphism between the underlying objects -/
f : P.X ⟶ Q.X
/-- compatibility of the given morphism with the given idempotents -/
comm : f = P.p ≫ f ≫ Q.p := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.Hom
instance [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : Inhabited (Hom P Q) :=
⟨⟨0, by rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]⟩⟩
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem p_comp {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f := by rw [f.comm, ← assoc, P.idem]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.p_comp CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.p_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem comp_p {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : f.f ≫ Q.p = f.f := by
rw [f.comm, assoc, assoc, Q.idem]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.comp_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.comp_p
@[reassoc]
theorem p_comm {P Q : Karoubi C} (f : Hom P Q) : P.p ≫ f.f = f.f ≫ Q.p := by rw [p_comp, comp_p]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.p_comm CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.p_comm
theorem comp_proof {P Q R : Karoubi C} (g : Hom Q R) (f : Hom P Q) :
f.f ≫ g.f = P.p ≫ (f.f ≫ g.f) ≫ R.p := by rw [assoc, comp_p, ← assoc, p_comp]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.comp_proof CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.comp_proof
/-- The category structure on the karoubi envelope of a category. -/
instance : Category (Karoubi C) where
Hom := Karoubi.Hom
id P := ⟨P.p, by repeat' rw [P.idem]⟩
comp f g := ⟨f.f ≫ g.f, Karoubi.comp_proof g f⟩
@[simp]
theorem hom_ext_iff {P Q : Karoubi C} {f g : P ⟶ Q} : f = g ↔ f.f = g.f := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [h]
· apply Hom.ext
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.hom_ext_iff
-- Porting note: added because `Hom.ext` is not triggered automatically
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {P Q : Karoubi C} (f g : P ⟶ Q) (h : f.f = g.f) : f = g := by
simpa [hom_ext_iff] using h
@[simp]
theorem comp_f {P Q R : Karoubi C} (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : Q ⟶ R) : (f ≫ g).f = f.f ≫ g.f := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.comp_f CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.comp_f
@[simp]
theorem id_eq {P : Karoubi C} : 𝟙 P = ⟨P.p, by repeat' rw [P.idem]⟩ := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.id_eq CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.id_eq
/-- It is possible to coerce an object of `C` into an object of `Karoubi C`.
See also the functor `toKaroubi`. -/
instance coe : CoeTC C (Karoubi C) :=
⟨fun X => ⟨X, 𝟙 X, by rw [comp_id]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.coe CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.coe
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as the linter complains
theorem coe_X (X : C) : (X : Karoubi C).X = X := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.coe_X CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.coe_X
@[simp]
theorem coe_p (X : C) : (X : Karoubi C).p = 𝟙 X := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.coe_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.coe_p
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_f {P Q : Karoubi C} (h : P = Q) :
Karoubi.Hom.f (eqToHom h) = P.p ≫ eqToHom (congr_arg Karoubi.X h) := by
subst h
simp only [eqToHom_refl, Karoubi.id_eq, comp_id]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.eq_to_hom_f CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.eqToHom_f
end Karoubi
/-- The obvious fully faithful functor `toKaroubi` sends an object `X : C` to the obvious
formal direct factor of `X` given by `𝟙 X`. -/
@[simps]
def toKaroubi : C ⥤ Karoubi C where
obj X := ⟨X, 𝟙 X, by rw [comp_id]⟩
map f := ⟨f, by simp only [comp_id, id_comp]⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubi
instance : (toKaroubi C).Full where map_surjective f := ⟨f.f, rfl⟩
instance : (toKaroubi C).Faithful where
map_injective := fun h => congr_arg Karoubi.Hom.f h
variable {C}
@[simps add]
instance instAdd [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Add (P ⟶ Q) where
add f g := ⟨f.f + g.f, by rw [add_comp, comp_add, ← f.comm, ← g.comm]⟩
@[simps neg]
instance instNeg [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Neg (P ⟶ Q) where
neg f := ⟨-f.f, by simpa only [neg_comp, comp_neg, neg_inj] using f.comm⟩
@[simps zero]
instance instZero [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : Zero (P ⟶ Q) where
zero := ⟨0, by simp only [comp_zero, zero_comp]⟩
instance instAddCommGroupHom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} : AddCommGroup (P ⟶ Q) where
zero_add f := by
ext
apply zero_add
add_zero f := by
ext
apply add_zero
add_assoc f g h' := by
ext
apply add_assoc
add_comm f g := by
ext
apply add_comm
add_left_neg f := by
ext
apply add_left_neg
zsmul := zsmulRec
nsmul := nsmulRec
namespace Karoubi
theorem hom_eq_zero_iff [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} {f : P ⟶ Q} : f = 0 ↔ f.f = 0 :=
hom_ext_iff
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.hom_eq_zero_iff CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.hom_eq_zero_iff
/-- The map sending `f : P ⟶ Q` to `f.f : P.X ⟶ Q.X` is additive. -/
@[simps]
def inclusionHom [Preadditive C] (P Q : Karoubi C) : AddMonoidHom (P ⟶ Q) (P.X ⟶ Q.X) where
toFun f := f.f
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.inclusion_hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.inclusionHom
@[simp]
theorem sum_hom [Preadditive C] {P Q : Karoubi C} {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → (P ⟶ Q)) :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).f = ∑ x ∈ s, (f x).f :=
map_sum (inclusionHom P Q) f s
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.sum_hom CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.sum_hom
end Karoubi
/-- The category `Karoubi C` is preadditive if `C` is. -/
instance [Preadditive C] : Preadditive (Karoubi C) where
homGroup P Q := by infer_instance
instance [Preadditive C] : Functor.Additive (toKaroubi C) where
open Karoubi
variable (C)
instance : IsIdempotentComplete (Karoubi C) := by
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro P p hp
simp only [hom_ext_iff, comp_f] at hp
use ⟨P.X, p.f, hp⟩
use ⟨p.f, by rw [comp_p p, hp]⟩
use ⟨p.f, by rw [hp, p_comp p]⟩
simp [hp]
instance [IsIdempotentComplete C] : (toKaroubi C).EssSurj :=
⟨fun P => by
rcases IsIdempotentComplete.idempotents_split P.X P.p P.idem with ⟨Y, i, e, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩⟩
use Y
exact
Nonempty.intro
{ hom := ⟨i, by erw [id_comp, ← h₂, ← assoc, h₁, id_comp]⟩
inv := ⟨e, by erw [comp_id, ← h₂, assoc, h₁, comp_id]⟩ }⟩
/-- If `C` is idempotent complete, the functor `toKaroubi : C ⥤ Karoubi C` is an equivalence. -/
instance toKaroubi_isEquivalence [IsIdempotentComplete C] : (toKaroubi C).IsEquivalence where
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi_is_equivalence CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubi_isEquivalence
/-- The equivalence `C ≅ Karoubi C` when `C` is idempotent complete. -/
def toKaroubiEquivalence [IsIdempotentComplete C] : C ≌ Karoubi C :=
(toKaroubi C).asEquivalence
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi_equivalence CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubiEquivalence
instance toKaroubiEquivalence_functor_additive [Preadditive C] [IsIdempotentComplete C] :
(toKaroubiEquivalence C).functor.Additive :=
(inferInstance : (toKaroubi C).Additive)
#align category_theory.idempotents.to_karoubi_equivalence_functor_additive CategoryTheory.Idempotents.toKaroubiEquivalence_functor_additive
namespace Karoubi
variable {C}
/-- The split mono which appears in the factorisation `decompId P`. -/
@[simps]
def decompId_i (P : Karoubi C) : P ⟶ P.X :=
⟨P.p, by erw [coe_p, comp_id, P.idem]⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.decomp_id_i CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.decompId_i
/-- The split epi which appears in the factorisation `decompId P`. -/
@[simps]
def decompId_p (P : Karoubi C) : (P.X : Karoubi C) ⟶ P :=
⟨P.p, by erw [coe_p, id_comp, P.idem]⟩
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.decomp_id_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.decompId_p
/-- The formal direct factor of `P.X` given by the idempotent `P.p` in the category `C`
is actually a direct factor in the category `Karoubi C`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem decompId (P : Karoubi C) : 𝟙 P = decompId_i P ≫ decompId_p P := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, id_eq, P.idem, decompId_i, decompId_p]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.decomp_id CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.decompId
theorem decomp_p (P : Karoubi C) : (toKaroubi C).map P.p = decompId_p P ≫ decompId_i P := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, decompId_p_f, decompId_i_f, P.idem, toKaroubi_map_f]
#align category_theory.idempotents.karoubi.decomp_p CategoryTheory.Idempotents.Karoubi.decomp_p
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Idempotents/Karoubi.lean | 291 | 292 | theorem decompId_i_toKaroubi (X : C) : decompId_i ((toKaroubi C).obj X) = 𝟙 _ := by |
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
#align_import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Asymptotics
We introduce these relations:
* `IsBigOWith c l f g` : "f is big O of g along l with constant c";
* `f =O[l] g` : "f is big O of g along l";
* `f =o[l] g` : "f is little o of g along l".
Here `l` is any filter on the domain of `f` and `g`, which are assumed to be the same. The codomains
of `f` and `g` do not need to be the same; all that is needed that there is a norm associated with
these types, and it is the norm that is compared asymptotically.
The relation `IsBigOWith c` is introduced to factor out common algebraic arguments in the proofs of
similar properties of `IsBigO` and `IsLittleO`. Usually proofs outside of this file should use
`IsBigO` instead.
Often the ranges of `f` and `g` will be the real numbers, in which case the norm is the absolute
value. In general, we have
`f =O[l] g ↔ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) =O[l] (fun x ↦ ‖g x‖)`,
and similarly for `IsLittleO`. But our setup allows us to use the notions e.g. with functions
to the integers, rationals, complex numbers, or any normed vector space without mentioning the
norm explicitly.
If `f` and `g` are functions to a normed field like the reals or complex numbers and `g` is always
nonzero, we have
`f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / (g x)) l (𝓝 0)`.
In fact, the right-to-left direction holds without the hypothesis on `g`, and in the other direction
it suffices to assume that `f` is zero wherever `g` is. (This generalization is useful in defining
the Fréchet derivative.)
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter NNReal
namespace Asymptotics
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {E : Type*} {F : Type*} {G : Type*} {E' : Type*}
{F' : Type*} {G' : Type*} {E'' : Type*} {F'' : Type*} {G'' : Type*} {E''' : Type*}
{R : Type*} {R' : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*}
variable [Norm E] [Norm F] [Norm G]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedAddCommGroup G''] [SeminormedRing R]
[SeminormedAddGroup E''']
[SeminormedRing R']
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜']
variable {c c' c₁ c₂ : ℝ} {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G}
variable {f' : α → E'} {g' : α → F'} {k' : α → G'}
variable {f'' : α → E''} {g'' : α → F''} {k'' : α → G''}
variable {l l' : Filter α}
section Defs
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- This version of the Landau notation `IsBigOWith C l f g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on
a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by `C * ‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded by `C`, modulo division by zero issues that are
avoided by this definition. Probably you want to use `IsBigO` instead of this relation. -/
irreducible_def IsBigOWith (c : ℝ) (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
#align asymptotics.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigOWith` is irreducible. -/
theorem isBigOWith_iff : IsBigOWith c l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by rw [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_iff
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.bound, IsBigOWith.of_bound⟩ := isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =O[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by a constant multiple of `‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided
by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsBigO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =O[" l "] " g:100 => IsBigO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigO` is
irreducible. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g := by rw [IsBigO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isBigO_iff : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_iff
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with a positive constant. -/
theorem isBigO_iff' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff] at h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
refine ⟨max c 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
apply hx.trans
gcongr
exact le_max_left _ _
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
obtain ⟨c, ⟨_, hc⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with the constant in the lower bound. -/
theorem isBigO_iff'' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff'] at h
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)]
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff']
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [← inv_inv c, inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)] at hx
theorem IsBigO.of_bound (c : ℝ) (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound
theorem IsBigO.of_bound' (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <| by
simp_rw [one_mul]
exact h
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound' Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound'
theorem IsBigO.bound : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigO_iff.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =o[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by an arbitrarily small constant
multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` tends to `0` along `l`, modulo division by zero
issues that are avoided by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsLittleO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_o Asymptotics.IsLittleO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =o[" l "] " g:100 => IsLittleO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g := by
rw [IsLittleO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
alias ⟨IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith, IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith⟩ := isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff
alias ⟨IsLittleO.bound, IsLittleO.of_bound⟩ := isLittleO_iff
#align asymptotics.is_o.bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.bound
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_bound
theorem IsLittleO.def (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def
theorem IsLittleO.def' (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigOWith_iff.2 <| isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def'
theorem IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (h : f =o[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simpa using h.def zero_lt_one
end Defs
/-! ### Conversions -/
theorem IsBigOWith.isBigO (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) : f =O[l] g := by rw [IsBigO_def]; exact ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.isBigOWith (hgf : f =o[l] g) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
hgf.def' zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigOWith
theorem IsLittleO.isBigO (hgf : f =o[l] g) : f =O[l] g :=
hgf.isBigOWith.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigO
theorem IsBigO.isBigOWith : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBigOWith
theorem IsBigOWith.weaken (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : c ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_of_superset h.bound fun x hx =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ := hx
_ ≤ _ := by gcongr
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.weaken Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.weaken
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_pos (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' > 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
⟨max c 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right c 1), h.weaken <| le_max_left c 1⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_pos
theorem IsBigO.exists_pos (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c > 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_pos
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_pos
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
let ⟨c, cpos, hc⟩ := h.exists_pos
⟨c, le_of_lt cpos, hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg
theorem IsBigO.exists_nonneg (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_nonneg
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_nonneg
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `IsBigOWith c f g` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.trans
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨c, fun _c' hc' => hc.weaken hc'⟩, fun h => h.exists⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith.trans <| by simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually
theorem IsBigO.exists_mem_basis {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : f =O[l] g')
(hb : l.HasBasis p s) :
∃ c > 0, ∃ i : ι, p i ∧ ∀ x ∈ s i, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
flip Exists.imp h.exists_pos fun c h => by
simpa only [isBigOWith_iff, hb.eventually_iff, exists_prop] using h
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_mem_basis Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_mem_basis
theorem isBigOWith_inv (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c⁻¹ l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff' hc]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_inv Asymptotics.isBigOWith_inv
-- We prove this lemma with strange assumptions to get two lemmas below automatically
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (h₀ : (∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖f x‖) ∨ ∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
constructor
· rintro H (_ | n)
· refine (H.def one_pos).mono fun x h₀' => ?_
rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => (hf x).trans ?_) fun hg => hg x
rwa [one_mul] at h₀'
· have : (0 : ℝ) < n.succ := Nat.cast_pos.2 n.succ_pos
exact (isBigOWith_inv this).1 (H.def' <| inv_pos.2 this)
· refine fun H => isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with ⟨n, hn⟩
have hn₀ : (0 : ℝ) < n := (inv_pos.2 ε0).trans hn
refine ((isBigOWith_inv hn₀).2 (H n)).bound.mono fun x hfg => ?_
refine hfg.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (inv_le_of_inv_le ε0 hn.le) ?_)
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right ((hf x).trans hfg) ?_) fun h => h x
exact inv_pos.2 hn₀
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le_aux Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le : f =o[l] g' ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g' x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inr fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le' : f' =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f' x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inl fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le' Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem isLittleO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =o[l] g' :=
IsLittleO.of_bound fun c hc => by simp [Subsingleton.elim (f' _) 0, mul_nonneg hc.le]
#align asymptotics.is_o_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem isBigO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =O[l] g' :=
isLittleO_of_subsingleton.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isBigO_of_subsingleton
section congr
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F}
/-! ### Congruence -/
theorem isBigOWith_congr (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁ ↔ IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
subst c₂
apply Filter.eventually_congr
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with _ e₁ e₂
rw [e₁, e₂]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_congr Asymptotics.isBigOWith_congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr' (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
(isBigOWith_congr hc hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr'
theorem IsBigOWith.congr (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x)
(hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
h.congr' hc (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_left (h : IsBigOWith c l f₁ g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f₂ g :=
h.congr rfl hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_left
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_right (h : IsBigOWith c l f g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f g₂ :=
h.congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_right
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_const (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f g) (hc : c₁ = c₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f g :=
h.congr hc (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_const Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_const
theorem isBigO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =O[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =O[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun c => isBigOWith_congr rfl hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_congr Asymptotics.isBigO_congr
theorem IsBigO.congr' (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
(isBigO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr'
theorem IsBigO.congr (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr
theorem IsBigO.congr_left (h : f₁ =O[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =O[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_left
theorem IsBigO.congr_right (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_right
theorem isLittleO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =o[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =o[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun c _hc => isBigOWith_congr (Eq.refl c) hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_o_congr Asymptotics.isLittleO_congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr' (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
(isLittleO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr'
theorem IsLittleO.congr (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr_left (h : f₁ =o[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =o[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_left
theorem IsLittleO.congr_right (h : f =o[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_right
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =O[l] g) : f₁ =O[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_O Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
instance transEventuallyEqIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =o[l] g) : f₁ =o[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_o Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
instance transEventuallyEqIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsBigOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =O[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =o[l] g₁)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsLittleOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =o[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
end congr
/-! ### Filter operations and transitivity -/
theorem IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto (hcfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β}
(hk : Tendsto k l' l) : IsBigOWith c l' (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hk hcfg.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto
theorem IsBigO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =O[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =O[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| hfg.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_O.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigO.comp_tendsto
theorem IsLittleO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =o[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =o[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (hfg.forall_isBigOWith cpos).comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_o.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.comp_tendsto
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
IsBigOWith c (map k l) f g ↔ IsBigOWith c l (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
exact eventually_map
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_map Asymptotics.isBigOWith_map
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =O[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =O[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_O_map Asymptotics.isBigO_map
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =o[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =o[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_o_map Asymptotics.isLittleO_map
theorem IsBigOWith.mono (h : IsBigOWith c l' f g) (hl : l ≤ l') : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hl h.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.mono Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.mono
theorem IsBigO.mono (h : f =O[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| h.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_O.mono Asymptotics.IsBigO.mono
theorem IsLittleO.mono (h : f =o[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_o.mono Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mono
theorem IsBigOWith.trans (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c' l g k) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith (c * c') l f k := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [hfg, hgk] with x hx hx'
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := hx
_ ≤ c * (c' * ‖k x‖) := by gcongr
_ = c * c' * ‖k x‖ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g) (hgk : g =O[l] k) :
f =O[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_nonneg
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := hgk.isBigOWith
(hc.trans hc' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans
instance transIsBigOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c l g k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact ((hfg this).trans hgk this.le).congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G'} (hfg : f =o[l] g)
(hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hgk.exists_pos
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hc cpos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
instance transIsLittleOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G') (· =o[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact (hfg.trans (hgk this) hc.le).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_isLittleO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g)
(hgk : g =o[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_pos
hc.trans_isLittleO hgk cpos
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
instance transIsBigOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) :
f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hgk.isBigOWith one_pos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans
instance transIsLittleOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) (hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =O[l] k :=
(IsBigO.of_bound' hfg).trans hgk
#align filter.eventually.trans_is_O Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} {l : Filter α}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound' <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans <| Real.le_norm_self _
#align filter.eventually.is_O Filter.Eventually.isBigO
section
variable (l)
theorem isBigOWith_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' hfg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le'
theorem isBigOWith_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
isBigOWith_of_le' l fun x => by
rw [one_mul]
exact hfg x
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le
theorem isBigO_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le' l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le'
theorem isBigO_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le
end
theorem isBigOWith_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : IsBigOWith 1 l f f :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _ => le_rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_refl Asymptotics.isBigOWith_refl
theorem isBigO_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : f =O[l] f :=
(isBigOWith_refl f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_refl Asymptotics.isBigO_refl
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ =O[l] f₂ :=
hf.trans_isBigO (isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_le (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f k :=
(hfg.trans (isBigOWith_of_le l hgk) hc).congr_const <| mul_one c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_le
theorem IsBigO.trans_le (hfg : f =O[l] g') (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g' x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =O[l] k :=
hfg.trans (isBigO_of_le l hgk)
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_le
theorem IsLittleO.trans_le (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith (isBigOWith_of_le _ hgk) zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_le Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_le
theorem isLittleO_irrefl' (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, ‖f' x‖ ≠ 0) : ¬f' =o[l] f' := by
intro ho
rcases ((ho.bound one_half_pos).and_frequently h).exists with ⟨x, hle, hne⟩
rw [one_div, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hle
exact (half_lt_self (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) hne.symm)).not_le hle
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl' Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl'
theorem isLittleO_irrefl (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) : ¬f'' =o[l] f'' :=
isLittleO_irrefl' <| h.mono fun _x => norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl
theorem IsBigO.not_isLittleO (h : f'' =O[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =o[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isLittleO h')
#align asymptotics.is_O.not_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.not_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.not_isBigO (h : f'' =o[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =O[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isBigO h')
#align asymptotics.is_o.not_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.not_isBigO
section Bot
variable (c f g)
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_bot : IsBigOWith c ⊥ f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| trivial
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_bot Asymptotics.isBigOWith_bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_bot : f =O[⊥] g :=
(isBigOWith_bot 1 f g).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_bot Asymptotics.isBigO_bot
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_bot : f =o[⊥] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun c _ => isBigOWith_bot c f g
#align asymptotics.is_o_bot Asymptotics.isLittleO_bot
end Bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_pure {x} : IsBigOWith c (pure x) f g ↔ ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_pure Asymptotics.isBigOWith_pure
theorem IsBigOWith.sup (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (h' : IsBigOWith c l' f g) :
IsBigOWith c (l ⊔ l') f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| mem_sup.2 ⟨h.bound, h'.bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup
theorem IsBigOWith.sup' (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (h' : IsBigOWith c' l' f g') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') (l ⊔ l') f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_sup.2 ⟨(h.weaken <| le_max_left c c').bound, (h'.weaken <| le_max_right c c').bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup'
theorem IsBigO.sup (h : f =O[l] g') (h' : f =O[l'] g') : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := h'.isBigOWith
(hc.sup' hc').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.sup Asymptotics.IsBigO.sup
theorem IsLittleO.sup (h : f =o[l] g) (h' : f =o[l'] g) : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).sup (h'.forall_isBigOWith cpos)
#align asymptotics.is_o.sup Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_sup : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' ↔ f =O[l] g' ∧ f =O[l'] g' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_sup Asymptotics.isBigO_sup
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_sup : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g ↔ f =o[l] g ∧ f =o[l'] g :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_sup Asymptotics.isLittleO_sup
theorem isBigOWith_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E} {g' : α → F}
(h : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' ↔
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g' := by
simp_rw [IsBigOWith_def, nhdsWithin_insert, eventually_sup, eventually_pure, h, true_and_iff]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_insert Asymptotics.isBigOWith_insert
protected theorem IsBigOWith.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E}
{g' : α → F} (h1 : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g') (h2 : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) :
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' :=
(isBigOWith_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.insert Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.insert
theorem isLittleO_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'} {g' : α → F'}
(h : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' ↔ g =o[𝓝[s] x] g' := by
simp_rw [IsLittleO_def]
refine forall_congr' fun c => forall_congr' fun hc => ?_
rw [isBigOWith_insert]
rw [h, norm_zero]
exact mul_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_insert Asymptotics.isLittleO_insert
protected theorem IsLittleO.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'}
{g' : α → F'} (h1 : g =o[𝓝[s] x] g') (h2 : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' :=
(isLittleO_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_o.insert Asymptotics.IsLittleO.insert
/-! ### Simplification : norm, abs -/
section NormAbs
variable {u v : α → ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => |u x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f u :=
@isBigOWith_norm_right _ _ _ _ _ _ f u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_right, IsBigOWith.norm_right⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_right, IsBigOWith.abs_right⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_right : (f =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_right : (f =O[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =O[l] u :=
@isBigO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_right, IsBigO.norm_right⟩ := isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_right, IsBigO.abs_right⟩ := isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_right : (f =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_right : (f =o[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =o[l] u :=
@isLittleO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_right, IsLittleO.norm_right⟩ := isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_right, IsLittleO.abs_right⟩ := isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l u g :=
@isBigOWith_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_left, IsBigOWith.norm_left⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_left, IsBigOWith.abs_left⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =O[l] g ↔ u =O[l] g :=
@isBigO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_left, IsBigO.norm_left⟩ := isBigO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_left, IsBigO.abs_left⟩ := isBigO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =o[l] g ↔ u =o[l] g :=
@isLittleO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_left, IsLittleO.norm_left⟩ := isLittleO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_left, IsLittleO.abs_left⟩ := isLittleO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_left
theorem isBigOWith_norm_norm :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g' :=
isBigOWith_norm_left.trans isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_norm
theorem isBigOWith_abs_abs :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) fun x => |v x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l u v :=
isBigOWith_abs_left.trans isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm, IsBigOWith.norm_norm⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs, IsBigOWith.abs_abs⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_abs
theorem isBigO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =O[l] g' :=
isBigO_norm_left.trans isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_norm
theorem isBigO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =O[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =O[l] v :=
isBigO_abs_left.trans isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_norm, IsBigO.norm_norm⟩ := isBigO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_abs, IsBigO.abs_abs⟩ := isBigO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_abs
theorem isLittleO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =o[l] g' :=
isLittleO_norm_left.trans isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_norm Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_norm
theorem isLittleO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =o[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =o[l] v :=
isLittleO_abs_left.trans isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_abs Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_norm, IsLittleO.norm_norm⟩ := isLittleO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_abs, IsLittleO.abs_abs⟩ := isLittleO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_abs
end NormAbs
/-! ### Simplification: negate -/
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => -g' x) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_right, IsBigOWith.neg_right⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_neg_right : (f =O[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigO_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_neg_right, IsBigO.neg_right⟩ := isBigO_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_neg_right : (f =o[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_neg_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_neg_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_neg_right, IsLittleO.neg_right⟩ := isLittleO_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.neg_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => -f' x) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_left, IsBigOWith.neg_left⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_neg_left : (fun x => -f' x) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_neg_left Asymptotics.isBigO_neg_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_neg_left, IsBigO.neg_left⟩ := isBigO_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_neg_left : (fun x => -f' x) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_neg_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_neg_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_neg_left, IsLittleO.neg_left⟩ := isLittleO_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.neg_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.neg_left
/-! ### Product of functions (right) -/
theorem isBigOWith_fst_prod : IsBigOWith 1 l f' fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _x => le_max_left _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_fst_prod Asymptotics.isBigOWith_fst_prod
theorem isBigOWith_snd_prod : IsBigOWith 1 l g' fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _x => le_max_right _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_snd_prod Asymptotics.isBigOWith_snd_prod
theorem isBigO_fst_prod : f' =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_fst_prod.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod Asymptotics.isBigO_fst_prod
theorem isBigO_snd_prod : g' =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_snd_prod.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod Asymptotics.isBigO_snd_prod
theorem isBigO_fst_prod' {f' : α → E' × F'} : (fun x => (f' x).1) =O[l] f' := by
simpa [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def] using isBigO_fst_prod (E' := E') (F' := F')
#align asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod' Asymptotics.isBigO_fst_prod'
theorem isBigO_snd_prod' {f' : α → E' × F'} : (fun x => (f' x).2) =O[l] f' := by
simpa [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def] using isBigO_snd_prod (E' := E') (F' := F')
#align asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod' Asymptotics.isBigO_snd_prod'
section
variable (f' k')
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_rightl (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
(h.trans isBigOWith_fst_prod hc).congr_const (mul_one c)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_rightl
theorem IsBigO.prod_rightl (h : f =O[l] g') : f =O[l] fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.prod_rightl k' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_rightl
theorem IsLittleO.prod_rightl (h : f =o[l] g') : f =o[l] fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).prod_rightl k' cpos.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_rightl
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_rightr (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
(h.trans isBigOWith_snd_prod hc).congr_const (mul_one c)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_rightr
theorem IsBigO.prod_rightr (h : f =O[l] g') : f =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.prod_rightr f' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_rightr
theorem IsLittleO.prod_rightr (h : f =o[l] g') : f =o[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).prod_rightr f' cpos.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_rightr
end
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_same (hf : IsBigOWith c l f' k') (hg : IsBigOWith c l g' k') :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' := by
rw [isBigOWith_iff] at *; filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using max_le
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_same Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_same
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left (hf : IsBigOWith c l f' k') (hg : IsBigOWith c' l g' k') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' :=
(hf.weaken <| le_max_left c c').prod_left_same (hg.weaken <| le_max_right c c')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_fst (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k') :
IsBigOWith c l f' k' :=
(isBigOWith_fst_prod.trans h zero_le_one).congr_const <| one_mul c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_fst
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_snd (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k') :
IsBigOWith c l g' k' :=
(isBigOWith_snd_prod.trans h zero_le_one).congr_const <| one_mul c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_snd
theorem isBigOWith_prod_left :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' k' ∧ IsBigOWith c l g' k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left_same h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_prod_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_prod_left
theorem IsBigO.prod_left (hf : f' =O[l] k') (hg : g' =O[l] k') : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' :=
let ⟨_c, hf⟩ := hf.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hg⟩ := hg.isBigOWith
(hf.prod_left hg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left
theorem IsBigO.prod_left_fst : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' → f' =O[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans isBigO_fst_prod
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left_fst
theorem IsBigO.prod_left_snd : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' → g' =O[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans isBigO_snd_prod
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left_snd
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_prod_left : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' ↔ f' =O[l] k' ∧ g' =O[l] k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_prod_left Asymptotics.isBigO_prod_left
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left (hf : f' =o[l] k') (hg : g' =o[l] k') :
(fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c hc =>
(hf.forall_isBigOWith hc).prod_left_same (hg.forall_isBigOWith hc)
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left_fst : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' → f' =o[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans_isLittleO isBigO_fst_prod
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left_fst
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left_snd : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' → g' =o[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans_isLittleO isBigO_snd_prod
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left_snd
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_prod_left : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' ↔ f' =o[l] k' ∧ g' =o[l] k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_prod_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_prod_left
theorem IsBigOWith.eq_zero_imp (h : IsBigOWith c l f'' g'') : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
Eventually.mono h.bound fun x hx hg => norm_le_zero_iff.1 <| by simpa [hg] using hx
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.eq_zero_imp Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.eq_zero_imp
theorem IsBigO.eq_zero_imp (h : f'' =O[l] g'') : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hC.eq_zero_imp
#align asymptotics.is_O.eq_zero_imp Asymptotics.IsBigO.eq_zero_imp
/-! ### Addition and subtraction -/
section add_sub
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} {g₁ g₂ : α → F'}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/Asymptotics.lean | 1,094 | 1,100 | theorem IsBigOWith.add (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ + c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g := by |
rw [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] with x hx₁ hx₂ using
calc
‖f₁ x + f₂ x‖ ≤ c₁ * ‖g x‖ + c₂ * ‖g x‖ := norm_add_le_of_le hx₁ hx₂
_ = (c₁ + c₂) * ‖g x‖ := (add_mul _ _ _).symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Equiv
#align_import ring_theory.localization.fraction_ring from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"831c494092374cfe9f50591ed0ac81a25efc5b86"
/-!
# Fraction ring / fraction field Frac(R) as localization
## Main definitions
* `IsFractionRing R K` expresses that `K` is a field of fractions of `R`, as an abbreviation of
`IsLocalization (NonZeroDivisors R) K`
## Main results
* `IsFractionRing.field`: a definition (not an instance) stating the localization of an integral
domain `R` at `R \ {0}` is a field
* `Rat.isFractionRing` is an instance stating `ℚ` is the field of fractions of `ℤ`
## Implementation notes
See `RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] {M : Submonoid R} (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable {A : Type*} [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] (K : Type*)
-- TODO: should this extend `Algebra` instead of assuming it?
/-- `IsFractionRing R K` states `K` is the field of fractions of an integral domain `R`. -/
abbrev IsFractionRing [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] :=
IsLocalization (nonZeroDivisors R) K
#align is_fraction_ring IsFractionRing
instance {R : Type*} [Field R] : IsFractionRing R R :=
IsLocalization.at_units _ (fun _ ↦ isUnit_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors)
/-- The cast from `Int` to `Rat` as a `FractionRing`. -/
instance Rat.isFractionRing : IsFractionRing ℤ ℚ where
map_units' := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero] at hx
simpa only [eq_intCast, isUnit_iff_ne_zero, Int.cast_eq_zero, Ne, Subtype.coe_mk] using hx
surj' := by
rintro ⟨n, d, hd, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, ⟨d, ?_⟩⟩, Rat.mul_den_eq_num _⟩
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos]
exact Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hd
exists_of_eq {x y} := by
rw [eq_intCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_inj]
rintro rfl
use 1
#align rat.is_fraction_ring Rat.isFractionRing
namespace IsFractionRing
open IsLocalization
variable {R K}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
theorem to_map_eq_zero_iff {x : R} : algebraMap R K x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
IsLocalization.to_map_eq_zero_iff _ le_rfl
#align is_fraction_ring.to_map_eq_zero_iff IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff
variable (R K)
protected theorem injective : Function.Injective (algebraMap R K) :=
IsLocalization.injective _ (le_of_eq rfl)
#align is_fraction_ring.injective IsFractionRing.injective
variable {R K}
@[norm_cast, simp]
-- Porting note: using `↑` didn't work, so I needed to explicitly put in the cast myself
theorem coe_inj {a b : R} : (Algebra.cast a : K) = Algebra.cast b ↔ a = b :=
(IsFractionRing.injective R K).eq_iff
#align is_fraction_ring.coe_inj IsFractionRing.coe_inj
instance (priority := 100) [NoZeroDivisors K] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R K :=
NoZeroSMulDivisors.of_algebraMap_injective <| IsFractionRing.injective R K
protected theorem to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors [Nontrivial R] {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ nonZeroDivisors R) : algebraMap R K x ≠ 0 :=
IsLocalization.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ le_rfl hx
#align is_fraction_ring.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_non_zero_divisors IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors
variable (A)
/-- A `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R - {0}` is an
integral domain. -/
protected theorem isDomain : IsDomain K :=
isDomain_of_le_nonZeroDivisors _ (le_refl (nonZeroDivisors A))
#align is_fraction_ring.is_domain IsFractionRing.isDomain
/-- The inverse of an element in the field of fractions of an integral domain. -/
protected noncomputable irreducible_def inv (z : K) : K := open scoped Classical in
if h : z = 0 then 0
else
mk' K ↑(sec (nonZeroDivisors A) z).2
⟨(sec _ z).1,
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h0 =>
h <| eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero (sec_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) z) h0⟩
#align is_fraction_ring.inv IsFractionRing.inv
protected theorem mul_inv_cancel (x : K) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x * IsFractionRing.inv A x = 1 := by
rw [IsFractionRing.inv, dif_neg hx, ←
IsUnit.mul_left_inj
(map_units K
⟨(sec _ x).1,
mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h0 =>
hx <| eq_zero_of_fst_eq_zero (sec_spec (nonZeroDivisors A) x) h0⟩),
one_mul, mul_assoc]
rw [mk'_spec, ← eq_mk'_iff_mul_eq]
exact (mk'_sec _ x).symm
#align is_fraction_ring.mul_inv_cancel IsFractionRing.mul_inv_cancel
/-- A `CommRing` `K` which is the localization of an integral domain `R` at `R - {0}` is a field.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
noncomputable abbrev toField : Field K where
__ := IsFractionRing.isDomain A
mul_inv_cancel := IsFractionRing.mul_inv_cancel A
inv_zero := show IsFractionRing.inv A (0 : K) = 0 by rw [IsFractionRing.inv]; exact dif_pos rfl
nnqsmul := _
qsmul := _
#align is_fraction_ring.to_field IsFractionRing.toField
lemma surjective_iff_isField [IsDomain R] : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R K) ↔ IsField R where
mp h := (RingEquiv.ofBijective (algebraMap R K)
⟨IsFractionRing.injective R K, h⟩).toMulEquiv.isField (IsFractionRing.toField R).toIsField
mpr h :=
letI := h.toField
(IsLocalization.atUnits R _ (S := K)
(fun _ hx ↦ Ne.isUnit (mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff_ne_zero.mp hx))).surjective
end CommRing
variable {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [IsDomain B] [Field K] {L : Type*} [Field L] [Algebra A K]
[IsFractionRing A K] {g : A →+* L}
theorem mk'_mk_eq_div {r s} (hs : s ∈ nonZeroDivisors A) :
mk' K r ⟨s, hs⟩ = algebraMap A K r / algebraMap A K s :=
mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <|
(div_mul_cancel₀ (algebraMap A K r)
(IsFractionRing.to_map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors hs)).symm
#align is_fraction_ring.mk'_mk_eq_div IsFractionRing.mk'_mk_eq_div
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_div {r} (s : nonZeroDivisors A) : mk' K r s = algebraMap A K r / algebraMap A K s :=
mk'_mk_eq_div s.2
#align is_fraction_ring.mk'_eq_div IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div
theorem div_surjective (z : K) :
∃ x y : A, y ∈ nonZeroDivisors A ∧ algebraMap _ _ x / algebraMap _ _ y = z :=
let ⟨x, ⟨y, hy⟩, h⟩ := mk'_surjective (nonZeroDivisors A) z
⟨x, y, hy, by rwa [mk'_eq_div] at h⟩
#align is_fraction_ring.div_surjective IsFractionRing.div_surjective
theorem isUnit_map_of_injective (hg : Function.Injective g) (y : nonZeroDivisors A) :
IsUnit (g y) :=
IsUnit.mk0 (g y) <|
show g.toMonoidWithZeroHom y ≠ 0 from map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors g hg y.2
#align is_fraction_ring.is_unit_map_of_injective IsFractionRing.isUnit_map_of_injective
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/FractionRing.lean | 180 | 184 | theorem mk'_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K] {x : R} {y : nonZeroDivisors R} :
mk' K x y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by |
refine ⟨fun hxy => ?_, fun h => by rw [h, mk'_zero]⟩
simp_rw [mk'_eq_zero_iff, mul_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff] at hxy
exact (exists_const _).mp hxy
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
/-!
# Basic theory of topological spaces.
The main definition is the type class `TopologicalSpace X` which endows a type `X` with a topology.
Then `Set X` gets predicates `IsOpen`, `IsClosed` and functions `interior`, `closure` and
`frontier`. Each point `x` of `X` gets a neighborhood filter `𝓝 x`. A filter `F` on `X` has
`x` as a cluster point if `ClusterPt x F : 𝓝 x ⊓ F ≠ ⊥`. A map `f : α → X` clusters at `x`
along `F : Filter α` if `MapClusterPt x F f : ClusterPt x (map f F)`. In particular
the notion of cluster point of a sequence `u` is `MapClusterPt x atTop u`.
For topological spaces `X` and `Y`, a function `f : X → Y` and a point `x : X`,
`ContinuousAt f x` means `f` is continuous at `x`, and global continuity is
`Continuous f`. There is also a version of continuity `PContinuous` for
partially defined functions.
## Notation
The following notation is introduced elsewhere and it heavily used in this file.
* `𝓝 x`: the filter `nhds x` of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`;
* `𝓝[≠] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x {x}ᶜ` of punctured neighborhoods of `x`.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space, interior, closure, frontier, neighborhood, continuity, continuous function
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
/-!
### Topological spaces
-/
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
#align is_closed_Union isClosed_iUnion_of_finite
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
#align is_closed_imp isClosed_imp
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
#align is_closed.not IsClosed.not
/-!
### Interior of a set
-/
theorem mem_interior : x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp only [interior, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_interior mem_interiorₓ
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_interior : IsOpen (interior s) :=
isOpen_sUnion fun _ => And.left
#align is_open_interior isOpen_interior
theorem interior_subset : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ => And.right
#align interior_subset interior_subset
theorem interior_maximal (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align interior_maximal interior_maximal
theorem IsOpen.interior_eq (h : IsOpen s) : interior s = s :=
interior_subset.antisymm (interior_maximal (Subset.refl s) h)
#align is_open.interior_eq IsOpen.interior_eq
theorem interior_eq_iff_isOpen : interior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isOpen_interior, IsOpen.interior_eq⟩
#align interior_eq_iff_is_open interior_eq_iff_isOpen
theorem subset_interior_iff_isOpen : s ⊆ interior s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [interior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
#align subset_interior_iff_is_open subset_interior_iff_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.subset_interior_iff (h₁ : IsOpen s) : s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h interior_subset, fun h₂ => interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
#align is_open.subset_interior_iff IsOpen.subset_interior_iff
theorem subset_interior_iff : t ⊆ interior s ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨interior s, isOpen_interior, h, interior_subset⟩, fun ⟨_U, hU, htU, hUs⟩ =>
htU.trans (interior_maximal hUs hU)⟩
#align subset_interior_iff subset_interior_iff
lemma interior_subset_iff : interior s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t := by
simp [interior]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem interior_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (Subset.trans interior_subset h) isOpen_interior
#align interior_mono interior_mono
@[simp]
theorem interior_empty : interior (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isOpen_empty.interior_eq
#align interior_empty interior_empty
@[simp]
theorem interior_univ : interior (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isOpen_univ.interior_eq
#align interior_univ interior_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_eq_univ : interior s = univ ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => univ_subset_iff.mp <| h.symm.trans_le interior_subset, fun h => h.symm ▸ interior_univ⟩
#align interior_eq_univ interior_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_interior : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
isOpen_interior.interior_eq
#align interior_interior interior_interior
@[simp]
theorem interior_inter : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
(Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono) s t).antisymm <|
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) <|
isOpen_interior.inter isOpen_interior
#align interior_inter interior_inter
theorem Set.Finite.interior_biInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
hs.induction_on (by simp) <| by intros; simp [*]
theorem Set.Finite.interior_sInter {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, hS.interior_biInter]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.interior_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.interior_biInter f
#align finset.interior_Inter Finset.interior_iInter
@[simp]
theorem interior_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) := by
rw [← sInter_range, (finite_range f).interior_sInter, biInter_range]
#align interior_Inter interior_iInter_of_finite
theorem interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty (h₁ : IsClosed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) : interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have : interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s := fun x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : IsOpen u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun hx₂ : x ∉ s =>
have : u \ s ⊆ t := fun x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂
have : u \ s ⊆ interior t := by rwa [(IsOpen.sdiff hu₁ h₁).subset_interior_iff]
have : u \ s ⊆ ∅ := by rwa [h₂] at this
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
Subset.antisymm (interior_maximal this isOpen_interior) (interior_mono subset_union_left)
#align interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty
theorem isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_isOpen]
simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
#align is_open_iff_forall_mem_open isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open
theorem interior_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set X) : interior (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, interior (s i) :=
subset_iInter fun _ => interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
#align interior_Inter_subset interior_iInter_subset
theorem interior_iInter₂_subset (p : ι → Sort*) (s : ∀ i, p i → Set X) :
interior (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), interior (s i j) :=
(interior_iInter_subset _).trans <| iInter_mono fun _ => interior_iInter_subset _
#align interior_Inter₂_subset interior_iInter₂_subset
theorem interior_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set X)) : interior (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s :=
calc
interior (⋂₀ S) = interior (⋂ s ∈ S, s) := by rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
_ ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := interior_iInter₂_subset _ _
#align interior_sInter_subset interior_sInter_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' interior).HasBasis p fun i => interior (s i) :=
h.lift' fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono
theorem Filter.lift'_interior_le (l : Filter X) : l.lift' interior ≤ l := fun _s hs ↦
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (ho : ∀ i, p i → IsOpen (s i)) : l.lift' interior = l :=
le_antisymm l.lift'_interior_le <| h.lift'_interior.ge_iff.2 fun i hi ↦ by
simpa only [(ho i hi).interior_eq] using h.mem_of_mem hi
/-!
### Closure of a set
-/
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_closure : IsClosed (closure s) :=
isClosed_sInter fun _ => And.left
#align is_closed_closure isClosed_closure
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter fun _ => And.right
#align subset_closure subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : X} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align not_mem_of_not_mem_closure not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
theorem closure_minimal (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align closure_minimal closure_minimal
theorem Disjoint.closure_left (hd : Disjoint s t) (ht : IsOpen t) :
Disjoint (closure s) t :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_left <| closure_minimal hd.subset_compl_right ht.isClosed_compl
#align disjoint.closure_left Disjoint.closure_left
theorem Disjoint.closure_right (hd : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
Disjoint s (closure t) :=
(hd.symm.closure_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.closure_right Disjoint.closure_right
theorem IsClosed.closure_eq (h : IsClosed s) : closure s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (Subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
#align is_closed.closure_eq IsClosed.closure_eq
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : closure s ⊆ s :=
closure_minimal (Subset.refl _) hs
#align is_closed.closure_subset IsClosed.closure_subset
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset_iff (h₁ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => closure_minimal h h₁⟩
#align is_closed.closure_subset_iff IsClosed.closure_subset_iff
theorem IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) :
x ∈ s ↔ closure ({x} : Set X) ⊆ s :=
(hs.closure_subset_iff.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff).symm
#align is_closed.mem_iff_closure_subset IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem closure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (Subset.trans h subset_closure) isClosed_closure
#align closure_mono closure_mono
theorem monotone_closure (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Monotone (@closure X _) := fun _ _ =>
closure_mono
#align monotone_closure monotone_closure
theorem diff_subset_closure_iff : s \ t ⊆ closure t ↔ s ⊆ closure t := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, union_eq_self_of_subset_left subset_closure]
#align diff_subset_closure_iff diff_subset_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : Set X) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure X).map_inf_le s t
#align closure_inter_subset_inter_closure closure_inter_subset_inter_closure
theorem isClosed_of_closure_subset (h : closure s ⊆ s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [subset_closure.antisymm h]; exact isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_of_closure_subset isClosed_of_closure_subset
theorem closure_eq_iff_isClosed : closure s = s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isClosed_closure, IsClosed.closure_eq⟩
#align closure_eq_iff_is_closed closure_eq_iff_isClosed
theorem closure_subset_iff_isClosed : closure s ⊆ s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨isClosed_of_closure_subset, IsClosed.closure_subset⟩
#align closure_subset_iff_is_closed closure_subset_iff_isClosed
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isClosed_empty.closure_eq
#align closure_empty closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty_iff (s : Set X) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, fun h => h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
#align closure_empty_iff closure_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_nonempty_iff : (closure s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, closure_empty_iff]
#align closure_nonempty_iff closure_nonempty_iff
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.of_closure, Set.Nonempty.closure⟩ := closure_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty.of_closure Set.Nonempty.of_closure
#align set.nonempty.closure Set.Nonempty.closure
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isClosed_univ.closure_eq
#align closure_univ closure_univ
@[simp]
theorem closure_closure : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
isClosed_closure.closure_eq
#align closure_closure closure_closure
theorem closure_eq_compl_interior_compl : closure s = (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [interior, closure, compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of]
simp only [compl_subset_compl, isOpen_compl_iff]
#align closure_eq_compl_interior_compl closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_union : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, compl_inter]
#align closure_union closure_union
theorem Set.Finite.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, hs.interior_biInter]
theorem Set.Finite.closure_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
closure (⋃₀ S) = ⋃ s ∈ S, closure s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hS.closure_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.closure_biUnion f
#align finset.closure_bUnion Finset.closure_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem closure_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) := by
rw [← sUnion_range, (finite_range _).closure_sUnion, biUnion_range]
#align closure_Union closure_iUnion_of_finite
theorem interior_subset_closure : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
Subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
#align interior_subset_closure interior_subset_closure
@[simp]
theorem interior_compl : interior sᶜ = (closure s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align interior_compl interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_compl : closure sᶜ = (interior s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align closure_compl closure_compl
theorem mem_closure_iff :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, IsOpen o → x ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h o oo ao =>
by_contradiction fun os =>
have : s ⊆ oᶜ := fun x xs xo => os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩
closure_minimal this (isClosed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
fun H _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun nc =>
let ⟨_, hc, hs⟩ := H _ h₁.isOpen_compl nc
hc (h₂ hs)⟩
#align mem_closure_iff mem_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff (h : IsOpen t) :
(closure s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hxcs, hxt⟩ => inter_comm t s ▸ mem_closure_iff.1 hxcs t h hxt, fun h =>
h.mono <| inf_le_inf_right t subset_closure⟩
#align closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff
theorem Filter.le_lift'_closure (l : Filter X) : l ≤ l.lift' closure :=
le_lift'.2 fun _ h => mem_of_superset h subset_closure
#align filter.le_lift'_closure Filter.le_lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' closure).HasBasis p fun i => closure (s i) :=
h.lift' (monotone_closure X)
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (hc : ∀ i, p i → IsClosed (s i)) : l.lift' closure = l :=
le_antisymm (h.ge_iff.2 fun i hi => (hc i hi).closure_eq ▸ mem_lift' (h.mem_of_mem hi))
l.le_lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure_eq_self Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot {l : Filter X} : l.lift' closure = ⊥ ↔ l = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique <| h ▸ l.le_lift'_closure, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ by rw [lift'_bot (monotone_closure _), closure_empty, principal_empty]⟩
#align filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot
theorem dense_iff_closure_eq : Dense s ↔ closure s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align dense_iff_closure_eq dense_iff_closure_eq
alias ⟨Dense.closure_eq, _⟩ := dense_iff_closure_eq
#align dense.closure_eq Dense.closure_eq
theorem interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl : interior s = ∅ ↔ Dense sᶜ := by
rw [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_compl, compl_univ_iff]
#align interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl
theorem Dense.interior_compl (h : Dense s) : interior sᶜ = ∅ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 <| by rwa [compl_compl]
#align dense.interior_compl Dense.interior_compl
/-- The closure of a set `s` is dense if and only if `s` is dense. -/
@[simp]
theorem dense_closure : Dense (closure s) ↔ Dense s := by
rw [Dense, Dense, closure_closure]
#align dense_closure dense_closure
protected alias ⟨_, Dense.closure⟩ := dense_closure
alias ⟨Dense.of_closure, _⟩ := dense_closure
#align dense.of_closure Dense.of_closure
#align dense.closure Dense.closure
@[simp]
theorem dense_univ : Dense (univ : Set X) := fun _ => subset_closure trivial
#align dense_univ dense_univ
/-- A set is dense if and only if it has a nonempty intersection with each nonempty open set. -/
theorem dense_iff_inter_open :
Dense s ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U.Nonempty → (U ∩ s).Nonempty := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rintro U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (h _) U U_op x_in
· intro x
rw [mem_closure_iff]
intro U U_op x_in
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩
#align dense_iff_inter_open dense_iff_inter_open
alias ⟨Dense.inter_open_nonempty, _⟩ := dense_iff_inter_open
#align dense.inter_open_nonempty Dense.inter_open_nonempty
theorem Dense.exists_mem_open (hs : Dense s) {U : Set X} (ho : IsOpen U)
(hne : U.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ U :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho hne
⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩
#align dense.exists_mem_open Dense.exists_mem_open
theorem Dense.nonempty_iff (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty ↔ Nonempty X :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty _ isOpen_univ ⟨x, trivial⟩
⟨y, hy.2⟩⟩
#align dense.nonempty_iff Dense.nonempty_iff
theorem Dense.nonempty [h : Nonempty X] (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.nonempty_iff.2 h
#align dense.nonempty Dense.nonempty
@[mono]
theorem Dense.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : Dense s₁) : Dense s₂ := fun x =>
closure_mono h (hd x)
#align dense.mono Dense.mono
/-- Complement to a singleton is dense if and only if the singleton is not an open set. -/
theorem dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open :
Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) ↔ ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro hd ho
exact (hd.inter_open_nonempty _ ho (singleton_nonempty _)).ne_empty (inter_compl_self _)
· refine fun ho => dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU hne => inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 fun hUx => ?_
obtain rfl : U = {x} := eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem.2 ⟨hne, hUx⟩
exact ho hU
#align dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open
/-!
### Frontier of a set
-/
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_interior (s : Set X) : closure s \ interior s = frontier s :=
rfl
#align closure_diff_interior closure_diff_interior
/-- Interior and frontier are disjoint. -/
lemma disjoint_interior_frontier : Disjoint (interior s) (frontier s) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← closure_diff_interior, diff_eq,
← inter_assoc, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, compl_inter_self, empty_inter]
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right_self, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset_closure]
#align closure_diff_frontier closure_diff_frontier
@[simp]
theorem self_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right, diff_eq_empty.2 subset_closure,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset, empty_union]
#align self_diff_frontier self_diff_frontier
theorem frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure : frontier s = closure s ∩ closure sᶜ := by
rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
#align frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure
theorem frontier_subset_closure : frontier s ⊆ closure s :=
diff_subset
#align frontier_subset_closure frontier_subset_closure
theorem IsClosed.frontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s ⊆ s :=
frontier_subset_closure.trans hs.closure_eq.subset
#align is_closed.frontier_subset IsClosed.frontier_subset
theorem frontier_closure_subset : frontier (closure s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff closure_closure.subset <| interior_mono subset_closure
#align frontier_closure_subset frontier_closure_subset
theorem frontier_interior_subset : frontier (interior s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff (closure_mono interior_subset) interior_interior.symm.subset
#align frontier_interior_subset frontier_interior_subset
/-- The complement of a set has the same frontier as the original set. -/
@[simp]
theorem frontier_compl (s : Set X) : frontier sᶜ = frontier s := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
#align frontier_compl frontier_compl
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ : frontier (univ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_univ frontier_univ
@[simp]
theorem frontier_empty : frontier (∅ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_empty frontier_empty
theorem frontier_inter_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure t ∪ closure s ∩ frontier t := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union]
refine (inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t)).trans_eq ?_
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc,
inter_comm (closure t)]
#align frontier_inter_subset frontier_inter_subset
theorem frontier_union_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure tᶜ ∪ closure sᶜ ∩ frontier t := by
simpa only [frontier_compl, ← compl_union] using frontier_inter_subset sᶜ tᶜ
#align frontier_union_subset frontier_union_subset
theorem IsClosed.frontier_eq (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s = s \ interior s := by
rw [frontier, hs.closure_eq]
#align is_closed.frontier_eq IsClosed.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : frontier s = closure s \ s := by
rw [frontier, hs.interior_eq]
#align is_open.frontier_eq IsOpen.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ frontier s = ∅ := by
rw [hs.frontier_eq, inter_diff_self]
#align is_open.inter_frontier_eq IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq
/-- The frontier of a set is closed. -/
theorem isClosed_frontier : IsClosed (frontier s) := by
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure]; exact IsClosed.inter isClosed_closure isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_frontier isClosed_frontier
/-- The frontier of a closed set has no interior point. -/
theorem interior_frontier (h : IsClosed s) : interior (frontier s) = ∅ := by
have A : frontier s = s \ interior s := h.frontier_eq
have B : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s := by rw [A]; exact interior_mono diff_subset
have C : interior (frontier s) ⊆ frontier s := interior_subset
have : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s ∩ (s \ interior s) :=
subset_inter B (by simpa [A] using C)
rwa [inter_diff_self, subset_empty_iff] at this
#align interior_frontier interior_frontier
theorem closure_eq_interior_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = interior s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel interior_subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_interior_union_frontier closure_eq_interior_union_frontier
theorem closure_eq_self_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel' interior_subset subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_self_union_frontier closure_eq_self_union_frontier
theorem Disjoint.frontier_left (ht : IsOpen t) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (frontier s) t :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right.1 <|
frontier_subset_closure.trans <| closure_minimal (disjoint_left.1 hd) <| isClosed_compl_iff.2 ht
#align disjoint.frontier_left Disjoint.frontier_left
theorem Disjoint.frontier_right (hs : IsOpen s) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint s (frontier t) :=
(hd.symm.frontier_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.frontier_right Disjoint.frontier_right
theorem frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior :
frontier s = (interior s)ᶜ ∩ (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [← frontier_compl, ← closure_compl, ← diff_eq, closure_diff_interior]
#align frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior
theorem compl_frontier_eq_union_interior :
(frontier s)ᶜ = interior s ∪ interior sᶜ := by
rw [frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior]
simp only [compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align compl_frontier_eq_union_interior compl_frontier_eq_union_interior
/-!
### Neighborhoods
-/
theorem nhds_def' (x : X) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsOpen s) (_ : x ∈ s), 𝓟 s := by
simp only [nhds_def, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (x ∈ _), iInf_and]
#align nhds_def' nhds_def'
/-- The open sets containing `x` are a basis for the neighborhood filter. See `nhds_basis_opens'`
for a variant using open neighborhoods instead. -/
theorem nhds_basis_opens (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s) fun s => s := by
rw [nhds_def]
exact hasBasis_biInf_principal
(fun s ⟨has, hs⟩ t ⟨hat, ht⟩ =>
⟨s ∩ t, ⟨⟨has, hat⟩, IsOpen.inter hs ht⟩, ⟨inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right⟩⟩)
⟨univ, ⟨mem_univ x, isOpen_univ⟩⟩
#align nhds_basis_opens nhds_basis_opens
theorem nhds_basis_closeds (x : X) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => x ∉ s ∧ IsClosed s) compl :=
⟨fun t => (nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.trans <|
compl_surjective.exists.trans <| by simp only [isOpen_compl_iff, mem_compl_iff]⟩
#align nhds_basis_closeds nhds_basis_closeds
@[simp]
theorem lift'_nhds_interior (x : X) : (𝓝 x).lift' interior = 𝓝 x :=
(nhds_basis_opens x).lift'_interior_eq_self fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_interior {x : X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p (interior <| s ·) :=
lift'_nhds_interior x ▸ h.lift'_interior
/-- A filter lies below the neighborhood filter at `x` iff it contains every open set around `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_iff {f} : f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ∀ s : Set X, x ∈ s → IsOpen s → s ∈ f := by simp [nhds_def]
#align le_nhds_iff le_nhds_iff
/-- To show a filter is above the neighborhood filter at `x`, it suffices to show that it is above
the principal filter of some open set `s` containing `x`. -/
theorem nhds_le_of_le {f} (h : x ∈ s) (o : IsOpen s) (sf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : 𝓝 x ≤ f := by
rw [nhds_def]; exact iInf₂_le_of_le s ⟨h, o⟩ sf
#align nhds_le_of_le nhds_le_of_le
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t :=
(nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.trans <| exists_congr fun _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, h.1.2, h.1.1⟩, fun h => ⟨⟨h.2.2, h.2.1⟩, h.1⟩⟩
#align mem_nhds_iff mem_nhds_iffₓ
/-- A predicate is true in a neighborhood of `x` iff it is true for all the points in an open set
containing `x`. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) ↔ ∃ t : Set X, (∀ x ∈ t, p x) ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t :=
mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [subset_def, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
#align eventually_nhds_iff eventually_nhds_iff
theorem mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds : x ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_interior.trans mem_nhds_iff.symm
#align mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds
theorem map_nhds {f : X → α} :
map f (𝓝 x) = ⨅ s ∈ { s : Set X | x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s }, 𝓟 (f '' s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds map_nhds
theorem mem_of_mem_nhds : s ∈ 𝓝 x → x ∈ s := fun H =>
let ⟨_t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 H; ht hs
#align mem_of_mem_nhds mem_of_mem_nhds
/-- If a predicate is true in a neighborhood of `x`, then it is true for `x`. -/
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhds {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhds h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhds
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhds (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, Subset.refl _, hs, hx⟩
#align is_open.mem_nhds IsOpen.mem_nhds
protected theorem IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨mem_of_mem_nhds, fun hx => mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hs, hx⟩⟩
#align is_open.mem_nhds_iff IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff
theorem IsClosed.compl_mem_nhds (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∉ s) : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x :=
hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds (mem_compl hx)
#align is_closed.compl_mem_nhds IsClosed.compl_mem_nhds
theorem IsOpen.eventually_mem (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds hs hx
#align is_open.eventually_mem IsOpen.eventually_mem
/-- The open neighborhoods of `x` are a basis for the neighborhood filter. See `nhds_basis_opens`
for a variant using open sets around `x` instead. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 870 | 873 | theorem nhds_basis_opens' (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsOpen s) fun x => x := by |
convert nhds_basis_opens x using 2
exact and_congr_left_iff.2 IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ico_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ioc_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIocMod
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
#align real.angle.to_real Real.Angle.toReal
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe Real.Angle.toReal_coe
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
#align real.angle.to_real_injective Real.Angle.toReal_injective
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
#align real.angle.to_real_inj Real.Angle.toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
#align real.angle.coe_to_real Real.Angle.coe_toReal
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
#align real.angle.neg_pi_lt_to_real Real.Angle.neg_pi_lt_toReal
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
#align real.angle.to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.toReal_le_pi
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.abs_toReal_le_pi
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
#align real.angle.to_Ioc_mod_to_real Real.Angle.toIocMod_toReal
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_zero Real.Angle.toReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_pi Real.Angle.toReal_pi
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_iff
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_neg_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff' h',
le_div_iff' h']
#align real.angle.nsmul_to_real_eq_mul Real.Angle.nsmul_toReal_eq_mul
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 688 | 690 | theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by |
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, James Gallicchio
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Count
import Batteries.Data.Fin.Lemmas
/-!
# Pairwise relations on a list
This file provides basic results about `List.Pairwise` and `List.pwFilter` (definitions are in
`Batteries.Data.List.Basic`).
`Pairwise r [a 0, ..., a (n - 1)]` means `∀ i j, i < j → r (a i) (a j)`. For example,
`Pairwise (≠) l` means that all elements of `l` are distinct, and `Pairwise (<) l` means that `l`
is strictly increasing.
`pwFilter r l` is the list obtained by iteratively adding each element of `l` that doesn't break
the pairwiseness of the list we have so far. It thus yields `l'` a maximal sublist of `l` such that
`Pairwise r l'`.
## Tags
sorted, nodup
-/
open Nat Function
namespace List
/-! ### Pairwise -/
theorem rel_of_pairwise_cons (p : (a :: l).Pairwise R) : ∀ {a'}, a' ∈ l → R a a' :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).1 _
theorem Pairwise.of_cons (p : (a :: l).Pairwise R) : Pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_cons.1 p).2
theorem Pairwise.tail : ∀ {l : List α} (_p : Pairwise R l), Pairwise R l.tail
| [], h => h
| _ :: _, h => h.of_cons
theorem Pairwise.drop : ∀ {l : List α} {n : Nat}, List.Pairwise R l → List.Pairwise R (l.drop n)
| _, 0, h => h
| [], _ + 1, _ => List.Pairwise.nil
| _ :: _, n + 1, h => Pairwise.drop (n := n) (pairwise_cons.mp h).right
theorem Pairwise.imp_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → R a b → S a b) (p : Pairwise R l) : Pairwise S l := by
induction p with
| nil => constructor
| @cons a l r _ ih =>
constructor
· exact fun x h => H (mem_cons_self ..) (mem_cons_of_mem _ h) <| r x h
· exact ih fun m m' => H (mem_cons_of_mem _ m) (mem_cons_of_mem _ m')
theorem Pairwise.and (hR : Pairwise R l) (hS : Pairwise S l) :
l.Pairwise fun a b => R a b ∧ S a b := by
induction hR with
| nil => simp only [Pairwise.nil]
| cons R1 _ IH =>
simp only [Pairwise.nil, pairwise_cons] at hS ⊢
exact ⟨fun b bl => ⟨R1 b bl, hS.1 b bl⟩, IH hS.2⟩
theorem pairwise_and_iff : l.Pairwise (fun a b => R a b ∧ S a b) ↔ Pairwise R l ∧ Pairwise S l :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.imp fun h => h.1, h.imp fun h => h.2⟩, fun ⟨hR, hS⟩ => hR.and hS⟩
theorem Pairwise.imp₂ (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b → T a b)
(hR : Pairwise R l) (hS : l.Pairwise S) : l.Pairwise T :=
(hR.and hS).imp fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => H _ _ h₁ h₂
theorem Pairwise.iff_of_mem {S : α → α → Prop} {l : List α}
(H : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ l → b ∈ l → (R a b ↔ S a b)) : Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise S l :=
⟨Pairwise.imp_of_mem fun m m' => (H m m').1, Pairwise.imp_of_mem fun m m' => (H m m').2⟩
theorem Pairwise.iff {S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b ↔ S a b) {l : List α} :
Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise S l :=
Pairwise.iff_of_mem fun _ _ => H ..
theorem pairwise_of_forall {l : List α} (H : ∀ x y, R x y) : Pairwise R l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
theorem Pairwise.and_mem {l : List α} :
Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise (fun x y => x ∈ l ∧ y ∈ l ∧ R x y) l :=
Pairwise.iff_of_mem <| by simp (config := { contextual := true })
theorem Pairwise.imp_mem {l : List α} :
Pairwise R l ↔ Pairwise (fun x y => x ∈ l → y ∈ l → R x y) l :=
Pairwise.iff_of_mem <| by simp (config := { contextual := true })
theorem Pairwise.forall_of_forall_of_flip (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (h₂ : Pairwise R l)
(h₃ : l.Pairwise (flip R)) : ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → R x y := by
induction l with
| nil => exact forall_mem_nil _
| cons a l ih =>
rw [pairwise_cons] at h₂ h₃
simp only [mem_cons]
rintro x (rfl | hx) y (rfl | hy)
· exact h₁ _ (l.mem_cons_self _)
· exact h₂.1 _ hy
· exact h₃.1 _ hx
· exact ih (fun x hx => h₁ _ <| mem_cons_of_mem _ hx) h₂.2 h₃.2 hx hy
theorem pairwise_singleton (R) (a : α) : Pairwise R [a] := by simp
theorem pairwise_pair {a b : α} : Pairwise R [a, b] ↔ R a b := by simp
theorem pairwise_append_comm {R : α → α → Prop} (s : ∀ {x y}, R x y → R y x) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Pairwise R (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Pairwise R (l₂ ++ l₁) := by
have (l₁ l₂ : List α) (H : ∀ x : α, x ∈ l₁ → ∀ y : α, y ∈ l₂ → R x y)
(x : α) (xm : x ∈ l₂) (y : α) (ym : y ∈ l₁) : R x y := s (H y ym x xm)
simp only [pairwise_append, and_left_comm]; rw [Iff.intro (this l₁ l₂) (this l₂ l₁)]
theorem pairwise_middle {R : α → α → Prop} (s : ∀ {x y}, R x y → R y x) {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
Pairwise R (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) ↔ Pairwise R (a :: (l₁ ++ l₂)) := by
show Pairwise R (l₁ ++ ([a] ++ l₂)) ↔ Pairwise R ([a] ++ l₁ ++ l₂)
rw [← append_assoc, pairwise_append, @pairwise_append _ _ ([a] ++ l₁), pairwise_append_comm s]
simp only [mem_append, or_comm]
theorem Pairwise.of_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β) (H : ∀ a b : α, S (f a) (f b) → R a b)
(p : Pairwise S (map f l)) : Pairwise R l :=
(pairwise_map.1 p).imp (H _ _)
theorem Pairwise.map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → β) (H : ∀ a b : α, R a b → S (f a) (f b))
(p : Pairwise R l) : Pairwise S (map f l) :=
pairwise_map.2 <| p.imp (H _ _)
theorem pairwise_filterMap (f : β → Option α) {l : List β} :
Pairwise R (filterMap f l) ↔ Pairwise (fun a a' : β => ∀ b ∈ f a, ∀ b' ∈ f a', R b b') l := by
let _S (a a' : β) := ∀ b ∈ f a, ∀ b' ∈ f a', R b b'
simp only [Option.mem_def]
induction l with
| nil => simp only [filterMap, Pairwise.nil]
| cons a l IH => ?_
match e : f a with
| none =>
rw [filterMap_cons_none _ _ e, pairwise_cons]
simp only [e, false_implies, implies_true, true_and, IH]
| some b =>
rw [filterMap_cons_some _ _ _ e]
simpa [IH, e] using fun _ =>
⟨fun h a ha b hab => h _ _ ha hab, fun h a b ha hab => h _ ha _ hab⟩
theorem Pairwise.filter_map {S : β → β → Prop} (f : α → Option β)
(H : ∀ a a' : α, R a a' → ∀ b ∈ f a, ∀ b' ∈ f a', S b b') {l : List α} (p : Pairwise R l) :
Pairwise S (filterMap f l) :=
(pairwise_filterMap _).2 <| p.imp (H _ _)
theorem pairwise_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] {l : List α} :
Pairwise R (filter p l) ↔ Pairwise (fun x y => p x → p y → R x y) l := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter, pairwise_filterMap]
simp
theorem Pairwise.filter (p : α → Bool) : Pairwise R l → Pairwise R (filter p l) :=
Pairwise.sublist (filter_sublist _)
theorem pairwise_join {L : List (List α)} :
Pairwise R (join L) ↔
(∀ l ∈ L, Pairwise R l) ∧ Pairwise (fun l₁ l₂ => ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₂, R x y) L := by
induction L with
| nil => simp
| cons l L IH =>
simp only [join, pairwise_append, IH, mem_join, exists_imp, and_imp, forall_mem_cons,
pairwise_cons, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff]
rw [and_comm, and_congr_left_iff]
intros; exact ⟨fun h a b c d e => h c d e a b, fun h c d e a b => h a b c d e⟩
theorem pairwise_bind {R : β → β → Prop} {l : List α} {f : α → List β} :
List.Pairwise R (l.bind f) ↔
(∀ a ∈ l, Pairwise R (f a)) ∧ Pairwise (fun a₁ a₂ => ∀ x ∈ f a₁, ∀ y ∈ f a₂, R x y) l := by
simp [List.bind, pairwise_join, pairwise_map]
theorem pairwise_iff_forall_sublist : l.Pairwise R ↔ (∀ {a b}, [a,b] <+ l → R a b) := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl IH =>
rw [List.pairwise_cons]
constructor <;> intro h
· intro
| a, b, .cons _ hab => exact IH.mp h.2 hab
| _, b, .cons₂ _ hab => refine h.1 _ (hab.subset ?_); simp
· constructor
· intro x hx
apply h
rw [List.cons_sublist_cons, List.singleton_sublist]
exact hx
· apply IH.mpr
intro a b hab
apply h; exact hab.cons _
@[deprecated pairwise_iff_forall_sublist]
theorem pairwise_of_reflexive_on_dupl_of_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {r : α → α → Prop}
(hr : ∀ a, 1 < count a l → r a a) (h : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, a ≠ b → r a b) : l.Pairwise r := by
apply pairwise_iff_forall_sublist.mpr
intro a b hab
if heq : a = b then
cases heq; apply hr
rwa [show [a,a] = replicate 2 a from rfl, ← le_count_iff_replicate_sublist] at hab
else
apply h <;> try (apply hab.subset; simp)
exact heq
/-- given a list `is` of monotonically increasing indices into `l`, getting each index
produces a sublist of `l`. -/
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Pairwise.lean | 205 | 219 | theorem map_get_sublist {l : List α} {is : List (Fin l.length)} (h : is.Pairwise (·.val < ·.val)) :
is.map (get l) <+ l := by |
suffices ∀ n l', l' = l.drop n → (∀ i ∈ is, n ≤ i) → map (get l) is <+ l'
from this 0 l (by simp) (by simp)
intro n l' hl' his
induction is generalizing n l' with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl IH =>
simp; cases hl'
have := IH h.of_cons (hd+1) _ rfl (pairwise_cons.mp h).1
specialize his hd (.head _)
have := (drop_eq_get_cons ..).symm ▸ this.cons₂ (get l hd)
have := Sublist.append (nil_sublist (take hd l |>.drop n)) this
rwa [nil_append, ← (drop_append_of_le_length ?_), take_append_drop] at this
simp [Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.le_of_lt hd.isLt), his]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 471 | 477 | theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by |
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeAlgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.RingQuot
import Mathlib.Algebra.TrivSqZeroExt
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.tensor_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b8d2eaa69d69ce8f03179a5cda774fc0cde984e4"
/-!
# Tensor Algebras
Given a commutative semiring `R`, and an `R`-module `M`, we construct the tensor algebra of `M`.
This is the free `R`-algebra generated (`R`-linearly) by the module `M`.
## Notation
1. `TensorAlgebra R M` is the tensor algebra itself. It is endowed with an R-algebra structure.
2. `TensorAlgebra.ι R` is the canonical R-linear map `M → TensorAlgebra R M`.
3. Given a linear map `f : M → A` to an R-algebra `A`, `lift R f` is the lift of `f` to an
`R`-algebra morphism `TensorAlgebra R M → A`.
## Theorems
1. `ι_comp_lift` states that the composition `(lift R f) ∘ (ι R)` is identical to `f`.
2. `lift_unique` states that whenever an R-algebra morphism `g : TensorAlgebra R M → A` is
given whose composition with `ι R` is `f`, then one has `g = lift R f`.
3. `hom_ext` is a variant of `lift_unique` in the form of an extensionality theorem.
4. `lift_comp_ι` is a combination of `ι_comp_lift` and `lift_unique`. It states that the lift
of the composition of an algebra morphism with `ι` is the algebra morphism itself.
## Implementation details
As noted above, the tensor algebra of `M` is constructed as the free `R`-algebra generated by `M`,
modulo the additional relations making the inclusion of `M` into an `R`-linear map.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R]
variable (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
namespace TensorAlgebra
/-- An inductively defined relation on `Pre R M` used to force the initial algebra structure on
the associated quotient.
-/
inductive Rel : FreeAlgebra R M → FreeAlgebra R M → Prop
-- force `ι` to be linear
| add {a b : M} : Rel (FreeAlgebra.ι R (a + b)) (FreeAlgebra.ι R a + FreeAlgebra.ι R b)
| smul {r : R} {a : M} :
Rel (FreeAlgebra.ι R (r • a)) (algebraMap R (FreeAlgebra R M) r * FreeAlgebra.ι R a)
#align tensor_algebra.rel TensorAlgebra.Rel
end TensorAlgebra
/-- The tensor algebra of the module `M` over the commutative semiring `R`.
-/
def TensorAlgebra :=
RingQuot (TensorAlgebra.Rel R M)
#align tensor_algebra TensorAlgebra
-- Porting note: Expanded `deriving Inhabited, Semiring, Algebra`
instance : Inhabited (TensorAlgebra R M) := RingQuot.instInhabited _
instance : Semiring (TensorAlgebra R M) := RingQuot.instSemiring _
-- `IsScalarTower` is not needed, but the instance isn't really canonical without it.
@[nolint unusedArguments]
instance instAlgebra {R A M} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [CommSemiring A]
[Algebra R A] [Module R M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] :
Algebra R (TensorAlgebra A M) :=
RingQuot.instAlgebra _
-- verify there is no diamond
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` #10906
example : (algebraNat : Algebra ℕ (TensorAlgebra R M)) = instAlgebra := rfl
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [CommSemiring A]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] :
SMulCommClass R S (TensorAlgebra A M) :=
RingQuot.instSMulCommClass _
instance {R S A M} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [CommSemiring A]
[SMul R S] [Algebra R A] [Algebra S A] [Module R M] [Module S M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower R A M] [IsScalarTower S A M] [IsScalarTower R S A] :
IsScalarTower R S (TensorAlgebra A M) :=
RingQuot.instIsScalarTower _
namespace TensorAlgebra
instance {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [Module S M] : Ring (TensorAlgebra S M) :=
RingQuot.instRing (Rel S M)
-- verify there is no diamond
-- but doesn't work at `reducible_and_instances` #10906
variable (S M : Type) [CommRing S] [AddCommGroup M] [Module S M] in
example : (algebraInt _ : Algebra ℤ (TensorAlgebra S M)) = instAlgebra := rfl
variable {M}
/-- The canonical linear map `M →ₗ[R] TensorAlgebra R M`.
-/
irreducible_def ι : M →ₗ[R] TensorAlgebra R M :=
{ toFun := fun m => RingQuot.mkAlgHom R _ (FreeAlgebra.ι R m)
map_add' := fun x y => by
rw [← (RingQuot.mkAlgHom R (Rel R M)).map_add]
exact RingQuot.mkAlgHom_rel R Rel.add
map_smul' := fun r x => by
rw [← (RingQuot.mkAlgHom R (Rel R M)).map_smul]
exact RingQuot.mkAlgHom_rel R Rel.smul }
#align tensor_algebra.ι TensorAlgebra.ι
theorem ringQuot_mkAlgHom_freeAlgebra_ι_eq_ι (m : M) :
RingQuot.mkAlgHom R (Rel R M) (FreeAlgebra.ι R m) = ι R m := by
rw [ι]
rfl
#align tensor_algebra.ring_quot_mk_alg_hom_free_algebra_ι_eq_ι TensorAlgebra.ringQuot_mkAlgHom_freeAlgebra_ι_eq_ι
-- Porting note: Changed `irreducible_def` to `def` to get `@[simps symm_apply]` to work
/-- Given a linear map `f : M → A` where `A` is an `R`-algebra, `lift R f` is the unique lift
of `f` to a morphism of `R`-algebras `TensorAlgebra R M → A`.
-/
@[simps symm_apply]
def lift {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] : (M →ₗ[R] A) ≃ (TensorAlgebra R M →ₐ[R] A) :=
{ toFun :=
RingQuot.liftAlgHom R ∘ fun f =>
⟨FreeAlgebra.lift R (⇑f), fun x y (h : Rel R M x y) => by
induction h <;>
simp only [Algebra.smul_def, FreeAlgebra.lift_ι_apply, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ,
RingHom.id_apply, map_mul, AlgHom.commutes, map_add]⟩
invFun := fun F => F.toLinearMap.comp (ι R)
left_inv := fun f => by
rw [ι]
ext1 x
exact (RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (FreeAlgebra.lift_ι_apply f x)
right_inv := fun F =>
RingQuot.ringQuot_ext' _ _ _ <|
FreeAlgebra.hom_ext <|
funext fun x => by
rw [ι]
exact
(RingQuot.liftAlgHom_mkAlgHom_apply _ _ _ _).trans (FreeAlgebra.lift_ι_apply _ _) }
#align tensor_algebra.lift TensorAlgebra.lift
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem ι_comp_lift {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : M →ₗ[R] A) :
(lift R f).toLinearMap.comp (ι R) = f := by
convert (lift R).symm_apply_apply f
#align tensor_algebra.ι_comp_lift TensorAlgebra.ι_comp_lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_ι_apply {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : M →ₗ[R] A) (x) :
lift R f (ι R x) = f x := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ι_comp_lift f]
rfl
#align tensor_algebra.lift_ι_apply TensorAlgebra.lift_ι_apply
@[simp]
theorem lift_unique {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : M →ₗ[R] A)
(g : TensorAlgebra R M →ₐ[R] A) : g.toLinearMap.comp (ι R) = f ↔ g = lift R f := by
rw [← (lift R).symm_apply_eq]
simp only [lift, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk]
#align tensor_algebra.lift_unique TensorAlgebra.lift_unique
-- Marking `TensorAlgebra` irreducible makes `Ring` instances inaccessible on quotients.
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/algebra.2Esemiring_to_ring.20breaks.20semimodule.20typeclass.20lookup/near/212580241
-- For now, we avoid this by not marking it irreducible.
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_ι {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (g : TensorAlgebra R M →ₐ[R] A) :
lift R (g.toLinearMap.comp (ι R)) = g := by
rw [← lift_symm_apply]
exact (lift R).apply_symm_apply g
#align tensor_algebra.lift_comp_ι TensorAlgebra.lift_comp_ι
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext]
theorem hom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : TensorAlgebra R M →ₐ[R] A}
(w : f.toLinearMap.comp (ι R) = g.toLinearMap.comp (ι R)) : f = g := by
rw [← lift_symm_apply, ← lift_symm_apply] at w
exact (lift R).symm.injective w
#align tensor_algebra.hom_ext TensorAlgebra.hom_ext
-- This proof closely follows `FreeAlgebra.induction`
/-- If `C` holds for the `algebraMap` of `r : R` into `TensorAlgebra R M`, the `ι` of `x : M`,
and is preserved under addition and muliplication, then it holds for all of `TensorAlgebra R M`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction {C : TensorAlgebra R M → Prop}
(algebraMap : ∀ r, C (algebraMap R (TensorAlgebra R M) r)) (ι : ∀ x, C (ι R x))
(mul : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a * b)) (add : ∀ a b, C a → C b → C (a + b))
(a : TensorAlgebra R M) : C a := by
-- the arguments are enough to construct a subalgebra, and a mapping into it from M
let s : Subalgebra R (TensorAlgebra R M) :=
{ carrier := C
mul_mem' := @mul
add_mem' := @add
algebraMap_mem' := algebraMap }
-- Porting note: Added `h`. `h` is needed for `of`.
let h : AddCommMonoid s := inferInstanceAs (AddCommMonoid (Subalgebra.toSubmodule s))
let of : M →ₗ[R] s := (TensorAlgebra.ι R).codRestrict (Subalgebra.toSubmodule s) ι
-- the mapping through the subalgebra is the identity
have of_id : AlgHom.id R (TensorAlgebra R M) = s.val.comp (lift R of) := by
ext
simp only [AlgHom.toLinearMap_id, LinearMap.id_comp, AlgHom.comp_toLinearMap,
LinearMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, lift_ι_apply,
Subalgebra.coe_val]
erw [LinearMap.codRestrict_apply]
-- finding a proof is finding an element of the subalgebra
rw [← AlgHom.id_apply (R := R) a, of_id]
exact Subtype.prop (lift R of a)
#align tensor_algebra.induction TensorAlgebra.induction
/-- The left-inverse of `algebraMap`. -/
def algebraMapInv : TensorAlgebra R M →ₐ[R] R :=
lift R (0 : M →ₗ[R] R)
#align tensor_algebra.algebra_map_inv TensorAlgebra.algebraMapInv
variable (M)
theorem algebraMap_leftInverse :
Function.LeftInverse algebraMapInv (algebraMap R <| TensorAlgebra R M) := fun x => by
simp [algebraMapInv]
#align tensor_algebra.algebra_map_left_inverse TensorAlgebra.algebraMap_leftInverse
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_inj (x y : R) :
algebraMap R (TensorAlgebra R M) x = algebraMap R (TensorAlgebra R M) y ↔ x = y :=
(algebraMap_leftInverse M).injective.eq_iff
#align tensor_algebra.algebra_map_inj TensorAlgebra.algebraMap_inj
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq_zero_iff (x : R) : algebraMap R (TensorAlgebra R M) x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff (algebraMap _ _) (algebraMap_leftInverse _).injective
#align tensor_algebra.algebra_map_eq_zero_iff TensorAlgebra.algebraMap_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq_one_iff (x : R) : algebraMap R (TensorAlgebra R M) x = 1 ↔ x = 1 :=
map_eq_one_iff (algebraMap _ _) (algebraMap_leftInverse _).injective
#align tensor_algebra.algebra_map_eq_one_iff TensorAlgebra.algebraMap_eq_one_iff
/-- A `TensorAlgebra` over a nontrivial semiring is nontrivial. -/
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (TensorAlgebra R M) :=
(algebraMap_leftInverse M).injective.nontrivial
variable {M}
/-- The canonical map from `TensorAlgebra R M` into `TrivSqZeroExt R M` that sends
`TensorAlgebra.ι` to `TrivSqZeroExt.inr`. -/
def toTrivSqZeroExt [Module Rᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R M] :
TensorAlgebra R M →ₐ[R] TrivSqZeroExt R M :=
lift R (TrivSqZeroExt.inrHom R M)
#align tensor_algebra.to_triv_sq_zero_ext TensorAlgebra.toTrivSqZeroExt
@[simp]
theorem toTrivSqZeroExt_ι (x : M) [Module Rᵐᵒᵖ M] [IsCentralScalar R M] :
toTrivSqZeroExt (ι R x) = TrivSqZeroExt.inr x :=
lift_ι_apply _ _
#align tensor_algebra.to_triv_sq_zero_ext_ι TensorAlgebra.toTrivSqZeroExt_ι
/-- The left-inverse of `ι`.
As an implementation detail, we implement this using `TrivSqZeroExt` which has a suitable
algebra structure. -/
def ιInv : TensorAlgebra R M →ₗ[R] M := by
letI : Module Rᵐᵒᵖ M := Module.compHom _ ((RingHom.id R).fromOpposite mul_comm)
haveI : IsCentralScalar R M := ⟨fun r m => rfl⟩
exact (TrivSqZeroExt.sndHom R M).comp toTrivSqZeroExt.toLinearMap
#align tensor_algebra.ι_inv TensorAlgebra.ιInv
theorem ι_leftInverse : Function.LeftInverse ιInv (ι R : M → TensorAlgebra R M) := fun x ↦ by
simp [ιInv]
#align tensor_algebra.ι_left_inverse TensorAlgebra.ι_leftInverse
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem ι_inj (x y : M) : ι R x = ι R y ↔ x = y :=
ι_leftInverse.injective.eq_iff
#align tensor_algebra.ι_inj TensorAlgebra.ι_inj
@[simp]
theorem ι_eq_zero_iff (x : M) : ι R x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by rw [← ι_inj R x 0, LinearMap.map_zero]
#align tensor_algebra.ι_eq_zero_iff TensorAlgebra.ι_eq_zero_iff
variable {R}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/TensorAlgebra/Basic.lean | 295 | 304 | theorem ι_eq_algebraMap_iff (x : M) (r : R) : ι R x = algebraMap R _ r ↔ x = 0 ∧ r = 0 := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI : Module Rᵐᵒᵖ M := Module.compHom _ ((RingHom.id R).fromOpposite mul_comm)
haveI : IsCentralScalar R M := ⟨fun r m => rfl⟩
have hf0 : toTrivSqZeroExt (ι R x) = (0, x) := lift_ι_apply _ _
rw [h, AlgHom.commutes] at hf0
have : r = 0 ∧ 0 = x := Prod.ext_iff.1 hf0
exact this.symm.imp_left Eq.symm
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rw [LinearMap.map_zero, RingHom.map_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.ValuationRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nakayama
#align_import ring_theory.discrete_valuation_ring.tfae from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Equivalent conditions for DVR
In `DiscreteValuationRing.TFAE`, we show that the following are equivalent for a
noetherian local domain that is not a field `(R, m, k)`:
- `R` is a discrete valuation ring
- `R` is a valuation ring
- `R` is a dedekind domain
- `R` is integrally closed with a unique prime ideal
- `m` is principal
- `dimₖ m/m² = 1`
- Every nonzero ideal is a power of `m`.
Also see `tfae_of_isNoetherianRing_of_localRing_of_isDomain` for a version without `¬ IsField R`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] (K : Type*) [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
open scoped DiscreteValuation
open LocalRing FiniteDimensional
theorem exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal [IsNoetherianRing R] [LocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
(h' : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal) (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ ⊥) :
∃ n : ℕ, I = maximalIdeal R ^ n := by
by_cases h : IsField R;
· exact ⟨0, by simp [letI := h.toField; (eq_bot_or_eq_top I).resolve_left hI]⟩
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx : _ = Ideal.span _⟩ := h'
by_cases hI' : I = ⊤
· use 0; rw [pow_zero, hI', Ideal.one_eq_top]
have H : ∀ r : R, ¬IsUnit r ↔ x ∣ r := fun r =>
(SetLike.ext_iff.mp hx r).trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
have : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
apply Ring.ne_bot_of_isMaximal_of_not_isField (maximalIdeal.isMaximal R) h
simp [hx]
have hx' := DiscreteValuationRing.irreducible_of_span_eq_maximalIdeal x this hx
have H' : ∀ r : R, r ≠ 0 → r ∈ nonunits R → ∃ n : ℕ, Associated (x ^ n) r := by
intro r hr₁ hr₂
obtain ⟨f, hf₁, rfl, hf₂⟩ := (WfDvdMonoid.not_unit_iff_exists_factors_eq r hr₁).mp hr₂
have : ∀ b ∈ f, Associated x b := by
intro b hb
exact Irreducible.associated_of_dvd hx' (hf₁ b hb) ((H b).mp (hf₁ b hb).1)
clear hr₁ hr₂ hf₁
induction' f using Multiset.induction with fa fs fh
· exact (hf₂ rfl).elim
rcases eq_or_ne fs ∅ with (rfl | hf')
· use 1
rw [pow_one, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.empty_eq_zero, Multiset.prod_zero, mul_one]
exact this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)
· obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := fh hf' fun b hb => this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem hb)
use n + 1
rw [pow_add, Multiset.prod_cons, mul_comm, pow_one]
exact Associated.mul_mul (this _ (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _)) hn
have : ∃ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ I := by
obtain ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ : ∃ r : R, r ∈ I ∧ r ≠ 0 := by
by_contra! h; apply hI; rw [eq_bot_iff]; exact h
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' r hr₂ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hr₁)
use n
rwa [← I.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem u.isUnit, mul_comm]
use Nat.find this
apply le_antisymm
· change ∀ s ∈ I, s ∈ _
by_contra! hI''
obtain ⟨s, hs₁, hs₂⟩ := hI''
apply hs₂
by_cases hs₃ : s = 0; · rw [hs₃]; exact zero_mem _
obtain ⟨n, u, rfl⟩ := H' s hs₃ (le_maximalIdeal hI' hs₁)
rw [mul_comm, Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem _ u.isUnit] at hs₁ ⊢
apply Ideal.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.find_min' this hs₁)
apply Ideal.pow_mem_pow
exact (H _).mpr (dvd_refl _)
· rw [hx, Ideal.span_singleton_pow, Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact Nat.find_spec this
#align exists_maximal_ideal_pow_eq_of_principal exists_maximalIdeal_pow_eq_of_principal
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DiscreteValuationRing/TFAE.lean | 92 | 150 | theorem maximalIdeal_isPrincipal_of_isDedekindDomain [LocalRing R] [IsDomain R]
[IsDedekindDomain R] : (maximalIdeal R).IsPrincipal := by |
classical
by_cases ne_bot : maximalIdeal R = ⊥
· rw [ne_bot]; infer_instance
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂⟩ : ∃ a ∈ maximalIdeal R, a ≠ (0 : R) := by
by_contra! h'; apply ne_bot; rwa [eq_bot_iff]
have hle : Ideal.span {a} ≤ maximalIdeal R := by rwa [Ideal.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
have : (Ideal.span {a}).radical = maximalIdeal R := by
rw [Ideal.radical_eq_sInf]
apply le_antisymm
· exact sInf_le ⟨hle, inferInstance⟩
· refine
le_sInf fun I hI =>
(eq_maximalIdeal <| hI.2.isMaximal (fun e => ha₂ ?_)).ge
rw [← Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, eq_bot_iff, ← e]; exact hI.1
have : ∃ n, maximalIdeal R ^ n ≤ Ideal.span {a} := by
rw [← this]; apply Ideal.exists_radical_pow_le_of_fg; exact IsNoetherian.noetherian _
cases' hn : Nat.find this with n
· have := Nat.find_spec this
rw [hn, pow_zero, Ideal.one_eq_top] at this
exact (Ideal.IsMaximal.ne_top inferInstance (eq_top_iff.mpr <| this.trans hle)).elim
obtain ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ : ∃ b ∈ maximalIdeal R ^ n, ¬b ∈ Ideal.span {a} := by
by_contra! h'; rw [Nat.find_eq_iff] at hn; exact hn.2 n n.lt_succ_self fun x hx => h' x hx
have hb₃ : ∀ m ∈ maximalIdeal R, ∃ k : R, k * a = b * m := by
intro m hm; rw [← Ideal.mem_span_singleton']; apply Nat.find_spec this
rw [hn, pow_succ]; exact Ideal.mul_mem_mul hb₁ hm
have hb₄ : b ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; apply hb₂; exact zero_mem _
let K := FractionRing R
let x : K := algebraMap R K b / algebraMap R K a
let M := Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R K) (maximalIdeal R)
have ha₃ : algebraMap R K a ≠ 0 := IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff.not.mpr ha₂
by_cases hx : ∀ y ∈ M, x * y ∈ M
· have := isIntegral_of_smul_mem_submodule M ?_ ?_ x hx
· obtain ⟨y, e⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.algebraMap_eq_of_integral this
refine (hb₂ (Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨y, ?_⟩)).elim
apply IsFractionRing.injective R K
rw [map_mul, e, div_mul_cancel₀ _ ha₃]
· rw [Submodule.ne_bot_iff]; refine ⟨_, ⟨a, ha₁, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
exact (IsFractionRing.to_map_eq_zero_iff (K := K)).not.mpr ha₂
· apply Submodule.FG.map; exact IsNoetherian.noetherian _
· have :
(M.map (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R K x)).comap (Algebra.linearMap R K) = ⊤ := by
by_contra h; apply hx
rintro m' ⟨m, hm, rfl : algebraMap R K m = m'⟩
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hb₃ m hm
have hk' : x * algebraMap R K m = algebraMap R K k := by
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, ← map_mul, ← hk, map_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ ha₃]
exact ⟨k, le_maximalIdeal h ⟨_, ⟨_, hm, rfl⟩, hk'⟩, hk'.symm⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy₁, hy₂⟩ : ∃ y ∈ maximalIdeal R, b * y = a := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_comap] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hy' : x * algebraMap R K y = algebraMap R K 1⟩ := this
rw [map_one, ← mul_div_right_comm, div_eq_one_iff_eq ha₃, ← map_mul] at hy'
exact ⟨y, hy, IsFractionRing.injective R K hy'⟩
refine ⟨⟨y, ?_⟩⟩
apply le_antisymm
· intro m hm; obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hb₃ m hm; rw [← hy₂, mul_comm, mul_assoc] at hk
rw [← mul_left_cancel₀ hb₄ hk, mul_comm]; exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton'.mpr ⟨_, rfl⟩
· rwa [Submodule.span_le, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.biproducts from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ac3ae212f394f508df43e37aa093722fa9b65d31"
/-!
# Biproducts and binary biproducts
We introduce the notion of (finite) biproducts and binary biproducts.
These are slightly unusual relative to the other shapes in the library,
as they are simultaneously limits and colimits.
(Zero objects are similar; they are "biterminal".)
For results about biproducts in preadditive categories see
`CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`.
In a category with zero morphisms, we model the (binary) biproduct of `P Q : C`
using a `BinaryBicone`, which has a cone point `X`,
and morphisms `fst : X ⟶ P`, `snd : X ⟶ Q`, `inl : P ⟶ X` and `inr : X ⟶ Q`,
such that `inl ≫ fst = 𝟙 P`, `inl ≫ snd = 0`, `inr ≫ fst = 0`, and `inr ≫ snd = 𝟙 Q`.
Such a `BinaryBicone` is a biproduct if the cone is a limit cone, and the cocone is a colimit
cocone.
For biproducts indexed by a `Fintype J`, a `bicone` again consists of a cone point `X`
and morphisms `π j : X ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ X` for each `j`,
such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
## Notation
As `⊕` is already taken for the sum of types, we introduce the notation `X ⊞ Y` for
a binary biproduct. We introduce `⨁ f` for the indexed biproduct.
## Implementation notes
Prior to leanprover-community/mathlib#14046,
`HasFiniteBiproducts` required a `DecidableEq` instance on the indexing type.
As this had no pay-off (everything about limits is non-constructive in mathlib),
and occasional cost
(constructing decidability instances appropriate for constructions involving the indexing type),
we made everything classical.
-/
noncomputable section
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open scoped Classical
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
variable {J : Type w}
universe uC' uC uD' uD
variable {C : Type uC} [Category.{uC'} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
variable {D : Type uD} [Category.{uD'} D] [HasZeroMorphisms D]
/-- A `c : Bicone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* morphisms `π j : pt ⟶ F j` and `ι j : F j ⟶ pt` for each `j`,
* such that `ι j ≫ π j'` is the identity when `j = j'` and zero otherwise.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] Porting note (#5171): removed
structure Bicone (F : J → C) where
pt : C
π : ∀ j, pt ⟶ F j
ι : ∀ j, F j ⟶ pt
ι_π : ∀ j j', ι j ≫ π j' =
if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congrArg F h) else 0 := by aesop
#align category_theory.limits.bicone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.pt
attribute [inherit_doc Bicone] Bicone.pt Bicone.π Bicone.ι Bicone.ι_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_self {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.ι j ≫ B.π j = 𝟙 (F j) := by
simpa using B.ι_π j j
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_ι_π_self CategoryTheory.Limits.bicone_ι_π_self
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem bicone_ι_π_ne {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') : B.ι j ≫ B.π j' = 0 := by
simpa [h] using B.ι_π j j'
#align category_theory.limits.bicone_ι_π_ne CategoryTheory.Limits.bicone_ι_π_ne
variable {F : J → C}
/-- A bicone morphism between two bicones for the same diagram is a morphism of the bicone points
which commutes with the cone and cocone legs. -/
structure BiconeMorphism {F : J → C} (A B : Bicone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the bicones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wπ : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π j = A.π j := by aesop_cat
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
wι : ∀ j : J, A.ι j ≫ hom = B.ι j := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wι
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BiconeMorphism.wπ
/-- The category of bicones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Bicone.category : Category (Bicone F) where
Hom A B := BiconeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the `hom` field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
theorem BiconeMorphism.ext {c c' : Bicone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
congr
namespace Bicones
/-- To give an isomorphism between cocones, it suffices to give an
isomorphism between their vertices which commutes with the cocone
maps. -/
-- Porting note: `@[ext]` used to accept lemmas like this. Now we add an aesop rule
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory]), simps]
def ext {c c' : Bicone F} (φ : c.pt ≅ c'.pt)
(wι : ∀ j, c.ι j ≫ φ.hom = c'.ι j := by aesop_cat)
(wπ : ∀ j, φ.hom ≫ c'.π j = c.π j := by aesop_cat) : c ≅ c' where
hom := { hom := φ.hom }
inv :=
{ hom := φ.inv
wι := fun j => φ.comp_inv_eq.mpr (wι j).symm
wπ := fun j => φ.inv_comp_eq.mpr (wπ j).symm }
variable (F) in
/-- A functor `G : C ⥤ D` sends bicones over `F` to bicones over `G.obj ∘ F` functorially. -/
@[simps]
def functoriality (G : C ⥤ D) [Functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms G] :
Bicone F ⥤ Bicone (G.obj ∘ F) where
obj A :=
{ pt := G.obj A.pt
π := fun j => G.map (A.π j)
ι := fun j => G.map (A.ι j)
ι_π := fun i j => (Functor.map_comp _ _ _).symm.trans <| by
rw [A.ι_π]
aesop_cat }
map f :=
{ hom := G.map f.hom
wπ := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wπ, ← f.wπ j]
wι := fun j => by simp [-BiconeMorphism.wι, ← f.wι j] }
variable (G : C ⥤ D)
instance functoriality_full [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Full] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Full where
map_surjective t :=
⟨{ hom := G.preimage t.hom
wι := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wι j)
wπ := fun j => G.map_injective (by simpa using t.wπ j) }, by aesop_cat⟩
instance functoriality_faithful [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.Faithful] :
(functoriality F G).Faithful where
map_injective {_X} {_Y} f g h :=
BiconeMorphism.ext f g <| G.map_injective <| congr_arg BiconeMorphism.hom h
end Bicones
namespace Bicone
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
/-- Extract the cone from a bicone. -/
def toConeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, π := { app := fun j => B.π j.as } }
map {X Y} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wπ _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toConeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCone (B : Bicone F) : Cone (Discrete.functor F) := toConeFunctor.obj B
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone
-- TODO Consider changing this API to `toFan (B : Bicone F) : Fan F`.
@[simp]
theorem toCone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCone.pt = B.pt := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone_pt
@[simp]
theorem toCone_π_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCone.π.app j = B.π j.as := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone_π_app CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone_π_app
theorem toCone_π_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCone.π.app ⟨j⟩ = B.π j := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cone_π_app_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk
@[simp]
theorem toCone_proj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Fan.proj B.toCone j = B.π j := rfl
/-- Extract the cocone from a bicone. -/
def toCoconeFunctor : Bicone F ⥤ Cocone (Discrete.functor F) where
obj B := { pt := B.pt, ι := { app := fun j => B.ι j.as } }
map {X Y} F := { hom := F.hom, w := fun _ => F.wι _ }
/-- A shorthand for `toCoconeFunctor.obj` -/
abbrev toCocone (B : Bicone F) : Cocone (Discrete.functor F) := toCoconeFunctor.obj B
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_pt (B : Bicone F) : B.toCocone.pt = B.pt := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone_pt
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_ι_app (B : Bicone F) (j : Discrete J) : B.toCocone.ι.app j = B.ι j.as := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone_ι_app CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone_ι_app
@[simp]
theorem toCocone_inj (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : Cofan.inj B.toCocone j = B.ι j := rfl
theorem toCocone_ι_app_mk (B : Bicone F) (j : J) : B.toCocone.ι.app ⟨j⟩ = B.ι j := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.to_cocone_ι_app_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk
/-- We can turn any limit cone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofLimitCone {f : J → C} {t : Cone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsLimit t) : Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := t.π.app ⟨j⟩
ι j := ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι_π j j' := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.of_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.ofLimitCone
theorem ι_of_isLimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsLimit t.toCone) (j : J) :
t.ι j = ht.lift (Fan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.ι_of_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.ι_of_isLimit
/-- We can turn any colimit cocone over a discrete collection of objects into a bicone. -/
@[simps]
def ofColimitCocone {f : J → C} {t : Cocone (Discrete.functor f)} (ht : IsColimit t) :
Bicone f where
pt := t.pt
π j := ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0)
ι j := t.ι.app ⟨j⟩
ι_π j j' := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.of_colimit_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.ofColimitCocone
theorem π_of_isColimit {f : J → C} {t : Bicone f} (ht : IsColimit t.toCocone) (j : J) :
t.π j = ht.desc (Cofan.mk _ fun j' => if h : j' = j then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0) :=
ht.hom_ext fun j' => by
rw [ht.fac]
simp [t.ι_π]
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.π_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.π_of_isColimit
/-- Structure witnessing that a bicone is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] Porting note (#5171): removed
structure IsBilimit {F : J → C} (B : Bicone F) where
isLimit : IsLimit B.toCone
isColimit : IsColimit B.toCocone
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.IsBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.is_bilimit.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.IsBilimit.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.is_bilimit.is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.IsBilimit.isColimit
attribute [inherit_doc IsBilimit] IsBilimit.isLimit IsBilimit.isColimit
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this, linter doesn't notice it is removed
attribute [-simp, nolint simpNF] IsBilimit.mk.injEq
attribute [local ext] Bicone.IsBilimit
instance subsingleton_isBilimit {f : J → C} {c : Bicone f} : Subsingleton c.IsBilimit :=
⟨fun _ _ => Bicone.IsBilimit.ext _ _ (Subsingleton.elim _ _) (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.subsingleton_is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.subsingleton_isBilimit
section Whisker
variable {K : Type w'}
/-- Whisker a bicone with an equivalence between the indexing types. -/
@[simps]
def whisker {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) : Bicone (f ∘ g) where
pt := c.pt
π k := c.π (g k)
ι k := c.ι (g k)
ι_π k k' := by
simp only [c.ι_π]
split_ifs with h h' h' <;> simp [Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq g] at h h' <;> tauto
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whisker
/-- Taking the cone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cone and postcomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCone ≅
(Cones.postcompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).inv).obj
(c.toCone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker_to_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whiskerToCone
/-- Taking the cocone of a whiskered bicone results in a cone isomorphic to one gained
by whiskering the cocone and precomposing with a suitable isomorphism. -/
def whiskerToCocone {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).toCocone ≅
(Cocones.precompose (Discrete.functorComp f g).hom).obj
(c.toCocone.whisker (Discrete.functor (Discrete.mk ∘ g))) :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker_to_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whiskerToCocone
/-- Whiskering a bicone with an equivalence between types preserves being a bilimit bicone. -/
def whiskerIsBilimitIff {f : J → C} (c : Bicone f) (g : K ≃ J) :
(c.whisker g).IsBilimit ≃ c.IsBilimit := by
refine equivOfSubsingletonOfSubsingleton (fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩) fun hc => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· let this := IsLimit.ofIsoLimit hc.isLimit (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g)
let this := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _) this
exact IsLimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· let this := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit hc.isColimit (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g)
let this := (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _) this
exact IsColimit.ofWhiskerEquivalence (Discrete.equivalence g) this
· apply IsLimit.ofIsoLimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCone c g).symm
apply (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g).symm _).symm _
exact IsLimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isLimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
· apply IsColimit.ofIsoColimit _ (Bicone.whiskerToCocone c g).symm
apply (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv (Discrete.functorComp f g) _).symm _
exact IsColimit.whiskerEquivalence hc.isColimit (Discrete.equivalence g)
#align category_theory.limits.bicone.whisker_is_bilimit_iff CategoryTheory.Limits.Bicone.whiskerIsBilimitIff
end Whisker
end Bicone
/-- A bicone over `F : J → C`, which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone.
-/
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): removed; linter not ported yet
structure LimitBicone (F : J → C) where
bicone : Bicone F
isBilimit : bicone.IsBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit_bicone CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitBicone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_bicone.is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitBicone.isBilimit
attribute [inherit_doc LimitBicone] LimitBicone.bicone LimitBicone.isBilimit
/-- `HasBiproduct F` expresses the mere existence of a bicone which is
simultaneously a limit and a colimit of the diagram `F`.
-/
class HasBiproduct (F : J → C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_biproduct : Nonempty (LimitBicone F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct
attribute [inherit_doc HasBiproduct] HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
theorem HasBiproduct.mk {F : J → C} (d : LimitBicone F) : HasBiproduct F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproduct.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproduct.mk
/-- Use the axiom of choice to extract explicit `BiproductData F` from `HasBiproduct F`. -/
def getBiproductData (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : LimitBicone F :=
Classical.choice HasBiproduct.exists_biproduct
#align category_theory.limits.get_biproduct_data CategoryTheory.Limits.getBiproductData
/-- A bicone for `F` which is both a limit cone and a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.bicone (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Bicone F :=
(getBiproductData F).bicone
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.bicone CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.bicone
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a bilimit bicone. -/
def biproduct.isBilimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : (biproduct.bicone F).IsBilimit :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_bilimit CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isBilimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a limit cone. -/
def biproduct.isLimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsLimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isLimit
/-- `biproduct.bicone F` is a colimit cocone. -/
def biproduct.isColimit (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : IsColimit (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone :=
(getBiproductData F).isBilimit.isColimit
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_colimit CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isColimit
instance (priority := 100) hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasProduct F :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCone
isLimit := biproduct.isLimit F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_product_of_has_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.hasProduct_of_hasBiproduct
instance (priority := 100) hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct [HasBiproduct F] : HasCoproduct F :=
HasColimit.mk
{ cocone := (biproduct.bicone F).toCocone
isColimit := biproduct.isColimit F }
#align category_theory.limits.has_coproduct_of_has_biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoproduct_of_hasBiproduct
variable (J C)
/-- `C` has biproducts of shape `J` if we have
a limit and a colimit, with the same cone points,
of every function `F : J → C`.
-/
class HasBiproductsOfShape : Prop where
has_biproduct : ∀ F : J → C, HasBiproduct F
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproducts_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBiproductsOfShape
attribute [instance 100] HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct
/-- `HasFiniteBiproducts C` represents a choice of biproduct for every family of objects in `C`
indexed by a finite type. -/
class HasFiniteBiproducts : Prop where
out : ∀ n, HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.HasFiniteBiproducts
attribute [inherit_doc HasFiniteBiproducts] HasFiniteBiproducts.out
variable {J}
theorem hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv {K : Type w'} [HasBiproductsOfShape K C] (e : J ≃ K) :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C :=
⟨fun F =>
let ⟨⟨h⟩⟩ := HasBiproductsOfShape.has_biproduct (F ∘ e.symm)
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
HasBiproduct.mk <| by
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), e.symm_apply_apply] using
LimitBicone.mk (c.whisker e) ((c.whiskerIsBilimitIff _).2 hc)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproducts_of_shape_of_equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv
instance (priority := 100) hasBiproductsOfShape_finite [HasFiniteBiproducts C] [Finite J] :
HasBiproductsOfShape J C := by
rcases Finite.exists_equiv_fin J with ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩
haveI : HasBiproductsOfShape (Fin n) C := HasFiniteBiproducts.out n
exact hasBiproductsOfShape_of_equiv C e
#align category_theory.limits.has_biproducts_of_shape_finite CategoryTheory.Limits.hasBiproductsOfShape_finite
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteProducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasLimitOfIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor.symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_products_of_has_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteProducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts
instance (priority := 100) hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts [HasFiniteBiproducts C] :
HasFiniteCoproducts C where
out _ := ⟨fun _ => hasColimitOfIso Discrete.natIsoFunctor⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_finite_coproducts_of_has_finite_biproducts CategoryTheory.Limits.hasFiniteCoproducts_of_hasFiniteBiproducts
variable {C}
/-- The isomorphism between the specified limit and the specified colimit for
a functor with a bilimit.
-/
def biproductIso (F : J → C) [HasBiproduct F] : Limits.piObj F ≅ Limits.sigmaObj F :=
(IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) (biproduct.isLimit F)).trans <|
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit F) (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.biproductIso
end Limits
namespace Limits
variable {J : Type w} {K : Type*}
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
/-- `biproduct f` computes the biproduct of a family of elements `f`. (It is defined as an
abbreviation for `limit (Discrete.functor f)`, so for most facts about `biproduct f`, you will
just use general facts about limits and colimits.) -/
abbrev biproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : C :=
(biproduct.bicone f).pt
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct
@[inherit_doc biproduct]
notation "⨁ " f:20 => biproduct f
/-- The projection onto a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : ⨁ f ⟶ f b :=
(biproduct.bicone f).π b
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.π
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_π (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).π b = biproduct.π f b := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.bicone_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.bicone_π
/-- The inclusion into a summand of a biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) : f b ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.bicone_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (b : J) :
(biproduct.bicone f).ι b = biproduct.ι f b := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.bicone_ι CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.bicone_ι
/-- Note that as this lemma has an `if` in the statement, we include a `DecidableEq` argument.
This means you may not be able to `simp` using this lemma unless you `open scoped Classical`. -/
@[reassoc]
theorem biproduct.ι_π [DecidableEq J] (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j j' : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = if h : j = j' then eqToHom (congr_arg f h) else 0 := by
convert (biproduct.bicone f).ι_π j j'
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_π
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both versions proven by simp
theorem biproduct.ι_π_self (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j = 𝟙 _ := by simp [biproduct.ι_π]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_π_self CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_π_self
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_π_ne (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (h : j ≠ j') :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.π f j' = 0 := by simp [biproduct.ι_π, h]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_π_ne CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_π_ne
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.eqToHom_comp_ι (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ biproduct.ι f j' = biproduct.ι f j := by
cases w
simp
-- The `simpNF` linter incorrectly identifies these as simp lemmas that could never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
-- They are used by `simp` in `biproduct.whiskerEquiv` below.
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem biproduct.π_comp_eqToHom (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] {j j' : J} (w : j = j') :
biproduct.π f j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = biproduct.π f j' := by
cases w
simp
/-- Given a collection of maps into the summands, we obtain a map into the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.lift {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) : P ⟶ ⨁ f :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).lift (Fan.mk P p)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift
/-- Given a collection of maps out of the summands, we obtain a map out of the biproduct. -/
abbrev biproduct.desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) : ⨁ f ⟶ P :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).desc (Cofan.mk P p)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.desc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_π {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, P ⟶ f b) (j : J) :
biproduct.lift p ≫ biproduct.π f j = p j := (biproduct.isLimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_desc {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {P : C} (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ P) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.desc p = p j := (biproduct.isColimit f).fac _ ⟨j⟩
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_desc
/-- Given a collection of maps between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain a map between the biproducts. -/
abbrev biproduct.map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsLimit.map (biproduct.bicone f).toCone (biproduct.isLimit g)
(Discrete.natTrans (fun j => p j.as))
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map
/-- An alternative to `biproduct.map` constructed via colimits.
This construction only exists in order to show it is equal to `biproduct.map`. -/
abbrev biproduct.map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
IsColimit.map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map' CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map'
-- We put this at slightly higher priority than `biproduct.hom_ext'`,
-- to get the matrix indices in the "right" order.
@[ext 1001]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : Z ⟶ ⨁ f)
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ biproduct.π f j = h ≫ biproduct.π f j) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isLimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.hom_ext
@[ext]
theorem biproduct.hom_ext' {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] {Z : C} (g h : ⨁ f ⟶ Z)
(w : ∀ j, biproduct.ι f j ≫ g = biproduct.ι f j ≫ h) : g = h :=
(biproduct.isColimit f).hom_ext fun j => w j.as
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.hom_ext' CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.hom_ext'
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen product. -/
def biproduct.isoProduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∏ᶜ f :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isLimit f) (limit.isLimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_product CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoProduct
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).hom = Pi.lift (biproduct.π f) :=
limit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoProduct]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_product_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoProduct_hom
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoProduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoProduct f).inv = biproduct.lift (Pi.π f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => by simp [Iso.inv_comp_eq]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_product_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoProduct_inv
/-- The canonical isomorphism between the chosen biproduct and the chosen coproduct. -/
def biproduct.isoCoproduct (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f] : ⨁ f ≅ ∐ f :=
IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (biproduct.isColimit f) (colimit.isColimit _)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoCoproduct
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).inv = Sigma.desc (biproduct.ι f) :=
colimit.hom_ext fun j => by simp [biproduct.isoCoproduct]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_coproduct_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoCoproduct_inv
@[simp]
theorem biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom {f : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] :
(biproduct.isoCoproduct f).hom = biproduct.desc (Sigma.ι f) :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ fun j => by simp [← Iso.eq_comp_inv]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.iso_coproduct_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isoCoproduct_hom
theorem biproduct.map_eq_map' {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) :
biproduct.map p = biproduct.map' p := by
ext
dsimp
simp only [Discrete.natTrans_app, Limits.IsColimit.ι_map_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.map_π,
Category.assoc, ← Bicone.toCone_π_app_mk, ← biproduct.bicone_π, ← Bicone.toCocone_ι_app_mk,
← biproduct.bicone_ι]
dsimp
rw [biproduct.ι_π_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h
· subst h; rw [eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]; erw [Category.comp_id]
· simp
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map_eq_map' CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map_eq_map'
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_π {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.π g j = biproduct.π f j ≫ p j :=
Limits.IsLimit.map_π _ _ _ (Discrete.mk j)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
(j : J) : biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.map p = p j ≫ biproduct.ι g j := by
rw [biproduct.map_eq_map']
apply
Limits.IsColimit.ι_map (biproduct.isColimit f) (biproduct.bicone g).toCocone
(Discrete.natTrans fun j => p j.as) (Discrete.mk j)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_map CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_map
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.map_desc {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j)
{P : C} (k : ∀ j, g j ⟶ P) :
biproduct.map p ≫ biproduct.desc k = biproduct.desc fun j => p j ≫ k j := by
ext; simp
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.map_desc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.lift_map {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] {P : C}
(k : ∀ j, P ⟶ f j) (p : ∀ j, f j ⟶ g j) :
biproduct.lift k ≫ biproduct.map p = biproduct.lift fun j => k j ≫ p j := by
ext; simp
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.lift_map
/-- Given a collection of isomorphisms between corresponding summands of a pair of biproducts
indexed by the same type, we obtain an isomorphism between the biproducts. -/
@[simps]
def biproduct.mapIso {f g : J → C} [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] (p : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) :
⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).hom
inv := biproduct.map fun b => (p b).inv
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.map_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.mapIso
/-- Two biproducts which differ by an equivalence in the indexing type,
and up to isomorphism in the factors, are isomorphic.
Unfortunately there are two natural ways to define each direction of this isomorphism
(because it is true for both products and coproducts separately).
We give the alternative definitions as lemmas below.
-/
@[simps]
def biproduct.whiskerEquiv {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K) (w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j)
[HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] : ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ g where
hom := biproduct.desc fun j => (w j).inv ≫ biproduct.ι g (e j)
inv := biproduct.desc fun k => eqToHom (by simp) ≫ (w (e.symm k)).hom ≫ biproduct.ι f _
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_hom_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).hom =
biproduct.lift fun k => biproduct.π f (e.symm k) ≫ (w _).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp) := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_hom]
ext k j
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· rintro rfl
simp at h
· exact Ne.symm h
lemma biproduct.whiskerEquiv_inv_eq_lift {f : J → C} {g : K → C} (e : J ≃ K)
(w : ∀ j, g (e j) ≅ f j) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct g] :
(biproduct.whiskerEquiv e w).inv =
biproduct.lift fun j => biproduct.π g (e j) ≫ (w j).hom := by
simp only [whiskerEquiv_inv]
ext j k
by_cases h : k = e j
· subst h
simp only [ι_desc_assoc, ← eqToHom_iso_hom_naturality_assoc w (e.symm_apply_apply j).symm,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply, eqToHom_comp_ι, Category.assoc, bicone_ι_π_self, Category.comp_id,
lift_π, bicone_ι_π_self_assoc]
· simp only [ι_desc_assoc, Category.assoc, ne_eq, lift_π]
rw [biproduct.ι_π_ne, biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc]
· simp
· exact h
· rintro rfl
simp at h
instance {ι} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasBiproduct (g i)] [HasBiproduct fun i => ⨁ g i] :
HasBiproduct fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2 where
exists_biproduct := Nonempty.intro
{ bicone :=
{ pt := ⨁ fun i => ⨁ g i
ι := fun X => biproduct.ι (g X.1) X.2 ≫ biproduct.ι (fun i => ⨁ g i) X.1
π := fun X => biproduct.π (fun i => ⨁ g i) X.1 ≫ biproduct.π (g X.1) X.2
ι_π := fun ⟨j, x⟩ ⟨j', y⟩ => by
split_ifs with h
· obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h
simp
· simp only [Sigma.mk.inj_iff, not_and] at h
by_cases w : j = j'
· cases w
simp only [heq_eq_eq, forall_true_left] at h
simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne _ h]
· simp [biproduct.ι_π_ne_assoc _ w] }
isBilimit :=
{ isLimit := mkFanLimit _
(fun s => biproduct.lift fun b => biproduct.lift fun c => s.proj ⟨b, c⟩)
isColimit := mkCofanColimit _
(fun s => biproduct.desc fun b => biproduct.desc fun c => s.inj ⟨b, c⟩) } }
/-- An iterated biproduct is a biproduct over a sigma type. -/
@[simps]
def biproductBiproductIso {ι} (f : ι → Type*) (g : (i : ι) → (f i) → C)
[∀ i, HasBiproduct (g i)] [HasBiproduct fun i => ⨁ g i] :
(⨁ fun i => ⨁ g i) ≅ (⨁ fun p : Σ i, f i => g p.1 p.2) where
hom := biproduct.lift fun ⟨i, x⟩ => biproduct.π _ i ≫ biproduct.π _ x
inv := biproduct.lift fun i => biproduct.lift fun x => biproduct.π _ (⟨i, x⟩ : Σ i, f i)
section πKernel
section
variable (f : J → C) [HasBiproduct f]
variable (p : J → Prop) [HasBiproduct (Subtype.restrict p f)]
/-- The canonical morphism from the biproduct over a restricted index type to the biproduct of
the full index type. -/
def biproduct.fromSubtype : ⨁ Subtype.restrict p f ⟶ ⨁ f :=
biproduct.desc fun j => biproduct.ι _ j.val
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.from_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.fromSubtype
/-- The canonical morphism from a biproduct to the biproduct over a restriction of its index
type. -/
def biproduct.toSubtype : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ Subtype.restrict p f :=
biproduct.lift fun _ => biproduct.π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.to_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.toSubtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_π [DecidablePred p] (j : J) :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j =
if h : p j then biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 := by
ext i; dsimp
rw [biproduct.fromSubtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π]
by_cases h : p j
· rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show (i : J) ≠ j from fun h₂ => h (h₂ ▸ i.2)), comp_zero]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.from_subtype_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.fromSubtype_π
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_eq_lift [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p =
biproduct.lift fun j => if h : p j then biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
biproduct.hom_ext _ _ (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.from_subtype_eq_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.fromSubtype_eq_lift
@[reassoc] -- Porting note: both version solved using simp
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π f j = biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) j := by
ext
rw [biproduct.fromSubtype, biproduct.ι_desc_assoc, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.from_subtype_π_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_π (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.toSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.π (Subtype.restrict p f) j = biproduct.π f j :=
biproduct.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.to_subtype_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.toSubtype_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_toSubtype [DecidablePred p] (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p =
if h : p j then biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 := by
ext i
rw [biproduct.toSubtype, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π]
by_cases h : p j
· rw [dif_pos h, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
· rw [dif_neg h, dif_neg (show j ≠ i from fun h₂ => h (h₂.symm ▸ i.2)), zero_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_to_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_toSubtype
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_eq_desc [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.toSubtype f p =
biproduct.desc fun j => if h : p j then biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) ⟨j, h⟩ else 0 :=
biproduct.hom_ext' _ _ (by simp)
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.to_subtype_eq_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.toSubtype_eq_desc
@[reassoc] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove both versions
theorem biproduct.ι_toSubtype_subtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p = biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) j := by
ext
rw [biproduct.toSubtype, Category.assoc, biproduct.lift_π, biproduct.ι_π, biproduct.ι_π]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₂
exacts [rfl, False.elim (h₂ (Subtype.ext h₁)), False.elim (h₁ (congr_arg Subtype.val h₂)), rfl]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_to_subtype_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_toSubtype_subtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.ι_fromSubtype (j : Subtype p) :
biproduct.ι (Subtype.restrict p f) j ≫ biproduct.fromSubtype f p = biproduct.ι f j :=
biproduct.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.ι_from_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.ι_fromSubtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype :
biproduct.fromSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f p = 𝟙 (⨁ Subtype.restrict p f) := by
refine biproduct.hom_ext _ _ fun j => ?_
rw [Category.assoc, biproduct.toSubtype_π, biproduct.fromSubtype_π_subtype, Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.from_subtype_to_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype [DecidablePred p] :
biproduct.toSubtype f p ≫ biproduct.fromSubtype f p =
biproduct.map fun j => if p j then 𝟙 (f j) else 0 := by
ext1 i
by_cases h : p i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.to_subtype_from_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype
end
section
variable (f : J → C) (i : J) [HasBiproduct f] [HasBiproduct (Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f)]
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.π f i` is the inclusion from the biproduct which omits `i`
from the index set `J` into the biproduct over `J`. -/
def biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (biproduct.fromSubtype f fun j => j ≠ i) (by simp) :
KernelFork (biproduct.π f i)) :=
Fork.IsLimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨s.ι ≫ biproduct.toSubtype _ _, by
apply biproduct.hom_ext; intro j
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι, Category.assoc, Category.assoc,
biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.map_π]
rcases Classical.em (i = j) with (rfl | h)
· rw [if_neg (Classical.not_not.2 rfl), comp_zero, comp_zero, KernelFork.condition]
· rw [if_pos (Ne.symm h), Category.comp_id], by
intro m hm
rw [← hm, KernelFork.ι_ofι, Category.assoc, biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype]
exact (Category.comp_id _).symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_limit_from_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype
instance : HasKernel (biproduct.π f i) :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype f i⟩
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.π f i` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict {i}ᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def kernelBiproductπIso : kernel (biproduct.π f i) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f :=
limit.isoLimitCone ⟨_, biproduct.isLimitFromSubtype f i⟩
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_biproduct_π_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelBiproductπIso
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.ι f i` is the projection from the biproduct over the index set `J`
onto the biproduct omitting `i`. -/
def biproduct.isColimitToSubtype :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (biproduct.toSubtype f fun j => j ≠ i) (by simp) :
CokernelCofork (biproduct.ι f i)) :=
Cofork.IsColimit.mk' _ fun s =>
⟨biproduct.fromSubtype _ _ ≫ s.π, by
apply biproduct.hom_ext'; intro j
rw [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ, biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.ι_map_assoc]
rcases Classical.em (i = j) with (rfl | h)
· rw [if_neg (Classical.not_not.2 rfl), zero_comp, CokernelCofork.condition]
· rw [if_pos (Ne.symm h), Category.id_comp], by
intro m hm
rw [← hm, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ, ← Category.assoc, biproduct.fromSubtype_toSubtype]
exact (Category.id_comp _).symm⟩
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.is_colimit_to_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.isColimitToSubtype
instance : HasCokernel (biproduct.ι f i) :=
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, biproduct.isColimitToSubtype f i⟩
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.ι f i` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict {i}ᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def cokernelBiproductιIso : cokernel (biproduct.ι f i) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict (fun j => j ≠ i) f :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone ⟨_, biproduct.isColimitToSubtype f i⟩
#align category_theory.limits.cokernel_biproduct_ι_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.cokernelBiproductιIso
end
section
open scoped Classical
-- Per leanprover-community/mathlib#15067, we only allow indexing in `Type 0` here.
variable {K : Type} [Finite K] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] (f : K → C)
/-- The limit cone exhibiting `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f` as the kernel of
`biproduct.toSubtype f p` -/
@[simps]
def kernelForkBiproductToSubtype (p : Set K) :
LimitCone (parallelPair (biproduct.toSubtype f p) 0) where
cone :=
KernelFork.ofι (biproduct.fromSubtype f pᶜ)
(by
ext j k
simp only [Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_fromSubtype_assoc, biproduct.ι_toSubtype_assoc,
comp_zero, zero_comp]
erw [dif_neg k.2]
simp only [zero_comp])
isLimit :=
KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun {W} g _ => g ≫ biproduct.toSubtype f pᶜ)
(by
intro W' g' w
ext j
simp only [Category.assoc, biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype, Pi.compl_apply,
biproduct.map_π]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· replace w := w =≫ biproduct.π _ ⟨j, not_not.mp h⟩
simpa using w.symm)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_fork_biproduct_to_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelForkBiproductToSubtype
instance (p : Set K) : HasKernel (biproduct.toSubtype f p) :=
HasLimit.mk (kernelForkBiproductToSubtype f p)
/-- The kernel of `biproduct.toSubtype f p` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def kernelBiproductToSubtypeIso (p : Set K) :
kernel (biproduct.toSubtype f p) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f :=
limit.isoLimitCone (kernelForkBiproductToSubtype f p)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_biproduct_to_subtype_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelBiproductToSubtypeIso
/-- The colimit cocone exhibiting `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f` as the cokernel of
`biproduct.fromSubtype f p` -/
@[simps]
def cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype (p : Set K) :
ColimitCocone (parallelPair (biproduct.fromSubtype f p) 0) where
cocone :=
CokernelCofork.ofπ (biproduct.toSubtype f pᶜ)
(by
ext j k
simp only [Category.assoc, Pi.compl_apply, biproduct.ι_fromSubtype_assoc,
biproduct.ι_toSubtype_assoc, comp_zero, zero_comp]
rw [dif_neg]
· simp only [zero_comp]
· exact not_not.mpr k.2)
isColimit :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.ofπ _ _ (fun {W} g _ => biproduct.fromSubtype f pᶜ ≫ g)
(by
intro W g' w
ext j
simp only [biproduct.toSubtype_fromSubtype_assoc, Pi.compl_apply, biproduct.ι_map_assoc]
split_ifs with h
· simp
· replace w := biproduct.ι _ (⟨j, not_not.mp h⟩ : p) ≫= w
simpa using w.symm)
(by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.cokernel_cofork_biproduct_from_subtype CategoryTheory.Limits.cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype
instance (p : Set K) : HasCokernel (biproduct.fromSubtype f p) :=
HasColimit.mk (cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype f p)
/-- The cokernel of `biproduct.fromSubtype f p` is `⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f`. -/
@[simps!]
def cokernelBiproductFromSubtypeIso (p : Set K) :
cokernel (biproduct.fromSubtype f p) ≅ ⨁ Subtype.restrict pᶜ f :=
colimit.isoColimitCocone (cokernelCoforkBiproductFromSubtype f p)
#align category_theory.limits.cokernel_biproduct_from_subtype_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.cokernelBiproductFromSubtypeIso
end
end πKernel
end Limits
namespace Limits
section FiniteBiproducts
variable {J : Type} [Finite J] {K : Type} [Finite K] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
[HasZeroMorphisms C] [HasFiniteBiproducts C] {f : J → C} {g : K → C}
/-- Convert a (dependently typed) matrix to a morphism of biproducts.
-/
def biproduct.matrix (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) : ⨁ f ⟶ ⨁ g :=
biproduct.desc fun j => biproduct.lift fun k => m j k
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.matrix CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.matrix
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct.matrix_π (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) (k : K) :
biproduct.matrix m ≫ biproduct.π g k = biproduct.desc fun j => m j k := by
ext
simp [biproduct.matrix]
#align category_theory.limits.biproduct.matrix_π CategoryTheory.Limits.biproduct.matrix_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/Biproducts.lean | 1,023 | 1,026 | theorem biproduct.ι_matrix (m : ∀ j k, f j ⟶ g k) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι f j ≫ biproduct.matrix m = biproduct.lift fun k => m j k := by |
ext
simp [biproduct.matrix]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.ToDFinsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
#align_import linear_algebra.dfinsupp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a148d797a1094ab554ad4183a4ad6f130358ef64"
/-!
# Properties of the module `Π₀ i, M i`
Given an indexed collection of `R`-modules `M i`, the `R`-module structure on `Π₀ i, M i`
is defined in `Data.DFinsupp`.
In this file we define `LinearMap` versions of various maps:
* `DFinsupp.lsingle a : M →ₗ[R] Π₀ i, M i`: `DFinsupp.single a` as a linear map;
* `DFinsupp.lmk s : (Π i : (↑s : Set ι), M i) →ₗ[R] Π₀ i, M i`: `DFinsupp.single a` as a linear map;
* `DFinsupp.lapply i : (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] M`: the map `fun f ↦ f i` as a linear map;
* `DFinsupp.lsum`: `DFinsupp.sum` or `DFinsupp.liftAddHom` as a `LinearMap`;
## Implementation notes
This file should try to mirror `LinearAlgebra.Finsupp` where possible. The API of `Finsupp` is
much more developed, but many lemmas in that file should be eligible to copy over.
## Tags
function with finite support, module, linear algebra
-/
variable {ι : Type*} {R : Type*} {S : Type*} {M : ι → Type*} {N : Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
variable [Semiring R] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)] [∀ i, Module R (M i)]
variable [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
/-- `DFinsupp.mk` as a `LinearMap`. -/
def lmk (s : Finset ι) : (∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), M i) →ₗ[R] Π₀ i, M i where
toFun := mk s
map_add' _ _ := mk_add
map_smul' c x := mk_smul c x
#align dfinsupp.lmk DFinsupp.lmk
/-- `DFinsupp.single` as a `LinearMap` -/
def lsingle (i) : M i →ₗ[R] Π₀ i, M i :=
{ DFinsupp.singleAddHom _ _ with
toFun := single i
map_smul' := single_smul }
#align dfinsupp.lsingle DFinsupp.lsingle
/-- Two `R`-linear maps from `Π₀ i, M i` which agree on each `single i x` agree everywhere. -/
theorem lhom_ext ⦃φ ψ : (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N⦄ (h : ∀ i x, φ (single i x) = ψ (single i x)) : φ = ψ :=
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_injective <| addHom_ext h
#align dfinsupp.lhom_ext DFinsupp.lhom_ext
/-- Two `R`-linear maps from `Π₀ i, M i` which agree on each `single i x` agree everywhere.
See note [partially-applied ext lemmas].
After apply this lemma, if `M = R` then it suffices to verify `φ (single a 1) = ψ (single a 1)`. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem lhom_ext' ⦃φ ψ : (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N⦄ (h : ∀ i, φ.comp (lsingle i) = ψ.comp (lsingle i)) :
φ = ψ :=
lhom_ext fun i => LinearMap.congr_fun (h i)
#align dfinsupp.lhom_ext' DFinsupp.lhom_ext'
/-- Interpret `fun (f : Π₀ i, M i) ↦ f i` as a linear map. -/
def lapply (i : ι) : (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] M i where
toFun f := f i
map_add' f g := add_apply f g i
map_smul' c f := smul_apply c f i
#align dfinsupp.lapply DFinsupp.lapply
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lmk_apply (s : Finset ι) (x) : (lmk s : _ →ₗ[R] Π₀ i, M i) x = mk s x :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.lmk_apply DFinsupp.lmk_apply
@[simp]
theorem lsingle_apply (i : ι) (x : M i) : (lsingle i : (M i) →ₗ[R] _) x = single i x :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.lsingle_apply DFinsupp.lsingle_apply
@[simp]
theorem lapply_apply (i : ι) (f : Π₀ i, M i) : (lapply i : (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] _) f = f i :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.lapply_apply DFinsupp.lapply_apply
section Lsum
-- Porting note: Unclear how true these docstrings are in lean 4
/-- Typeclass inference can't find `DFinsupp.addCommMonoid` without help for this case.
This instance allows it to be found where it is needed on the LHS of the colon in
`DFinsupp.moduleOfLinearMap`. -/
instance addCommMonoidOfLinearMap : AddCommMonoid (Π₀ i : ι, M i →ₗ[R] N) :=
inferInstance
#align dfinsupp.add_comm_monoid_of_linear_map DFinsupp.addCommMonoidOfLinearMap
/-- Typeclass inference can't find `DFinsupp.module` without help for this case.
This is needed to define `DFinsupp.lsum` below.
The cause seems to be an inability to unify the `∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i →ₗ[R] N)` instance that
we have with the `∀ i, Zero (M i →ₗ[R] N)` instance which appears as a parameter to the
`DFinsupp` type. -/
instance moduleOfLinearMap [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N] :
Module S (Π₀ i : ι, M i →ₗ[R] N) :=
DFinsupp.module
#align dfinsupp.module_of_linear_map DFinsupp.moduleOfLinearMap
variable (S)
instance {R : Type*} {S : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (σ : R →+* S)
{σ' : S →+* R} [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ] (M : Type*) (M₂ : Type*)
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M] [Module S M₂] :
EquivLike (LinearEquiv σ M M₂) M M₂ :=
inferInstance
/- Porting note: In every application of lsum that follows, the argument M needs to be explicitly
supplied, lean does not manage to gather that information itself -/
/-- The `DFinsupp` version of `Finsupp.lsum`.
See note [bundled maps over different rings] for why separate `R` and `S` semirings are used. -/
@[simps]
def lsum [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N] :
(∀ i, M i →ₗ[R] N) ≃ₗ[S] (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N where
toFun F :=
{ toFun := sumAddHom fun i => (F i).toAddMonoidHom
map_add' := (DFinsupp.liftAddHom fun (i : ι) => (F i).toAddMonoidHom).map_add
map_smul' := fun c f => by
dsimp
apply DFinsupp.induction f
· rw [smul_zero, AddMonoidHom.map_zero, smul_zero]
· intro a b f _ _ hf
rw [smul_add, AddMonoidHom.map_add, AddMonoidHom.map_add, smul_add, hf, ← single_smul,
sumAddHom_single, sumAddHom_single, LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe,
LinearMap.map_smul] }
invFun F i := F.comp (lsingle i)
left_inv F := by
ext
simp
right_inv F := by
refine DFinsupp.lhom_ext' (fun i ↦ ?_)
ext
simp
map_add' F G := by
refine DFinsupp.lhom_ext' (fun i ↦ ?_)
ext
simp
map_smul' c F := by
refine DFinsupp.lhom_ext' (fun i ↦ ?_)
ext
simp
#align dfinsupp.lsum DFinsupp.lsum
/-- While `simp` can prove this, it is often convenient to avoid unfolding `lsum` into `sumAddHom`
with `DFinsupp.lsum_apply_apply`. -/
theorem lsum_single [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N] (F : ∀ i, M i →ₗ[R] N) (i)
(x : M i) : lsum S (M := M) F (single i x) = F i x := by
simp
#align dfinsupp.lsum_single DFinsupp.lsum_single
end Lsum
end DecidableEq
/-! ### Bundled versions of `DFinsupp.mapRange`
The names should match the equivalent bundled `Finsupp.mapRange` definitions.
-/
section mapRange
variable {β β₁ β₂ : ι → Type*}
variable [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β₁ i)] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (β₂ i)]
variable [∀ i, Module R (β i)] [∀ i, Module R (β₁ i)] [∀ i, Module R (β₂ i)]
theorem mapRange_smul (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (r : R)
(hf' : ∀ i x, f i (r • x) = r • f i x) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) :
mapRange f hf (r • g) = r • mapRange f hf g := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply f, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, hf']
#align dfinsupp.map_range_smul DFinsupp.mapRange_smul
/-- `DFinsupp.mapRange` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def mapRange.linearMap (f : ∀ i, β₁ i →ₗ[R] β₂ i) : (Π₀ i, β₁ i) →ₗ[R] Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
{ mapRange.addMonoidHom fun i => (f i).toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := mapRange (fun i x => f i x) fun i => (f i).map_zero
map_smul' := fun r => mapRange_smul _ (fun i => (f i).map_zero) _ fun i => (f i).map_smul r }
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_map DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.linearMap_id :
(mapRange.linearMap fun i => (LinearMap.id : β₂ i →ₗ[R] _)) = LinearMap.id := by
ext
simp [linearMap]
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_map_id DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap_id
theorem mapRange.linearMap_comp (f : ∀ i, β₁ i →ₗ[R] β₂ i) (f₂ : ∀ i, β i →ₗ[R] β₁ i) :
(mapRange.linearMap fun i => (f i).comp (f₂ i)) =
(mapRange.linearMap f).comp (mapRange.linearMap f₂) :=
LinearMap.ext <| mapRange_comp (fun i x => f i x) (fun i x => f₂ i x)
(fun i => (f i).map_zero) (fun i => (f₂ i).map_zero) (by simp)
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_map_comp DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap_comp
theorem sum_mapRange_index.linearMap [DecidableEq ι] {f : ∀ i, β₁ i →ₗ[R] β₂ i}
{h : ∀ i, β₂ i →ₗ[R] N} {l : Π₀ i, β₁ i} :
DFinsupp.lsum ℕ h (mapRange.linearMap f l) = DFinsupp.lsum ℕ (fun i => (h i).comp (f i)) l := by
classical simpa [DFinsupp.sumAddHom_apply] using sum_mapRange_index fun i => by simp
#align dfinsupp.sum_map_range_index.linear_map DFinsupp.sum_mapRange_index.linearMap
/-- `DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap` as a `LinearEquiv`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapRange.linearEquiv (e : ∀ i, β₁ i ≃ₗ[R] β₂ i) : (Π₀ i, β₁ i) ≃ₗ[R] Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
{ mapRange.addEquiv fun i => (e i).toAddEquiv,
mapRange.linearMap fun i => (e i).toLinearMap with
toFun := mapRange (fun i x => e i x) fun i => (e i).map_zero
invFun := mapRange (fun i x => (e i).symm x) fun i => (e i).symm.map_zero }
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_equiv DFinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.linearEquiv_refl :
(mapRange.linearEquiv fun i => LinearEquiv.refl R (β₁ i)) = LinearEquiv.refl _ _ :=
LinearEquiv.ext mapRange_id
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_equiv_refl DFinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv_refl
theorem mapRange.linearEquiv_trans (f : ∀ i, β i ≃ₗ[R] β₁ i) (f₂ : ∀ i, β₁ i ≃ₗ[R] β₂ i) :
(mapRange.linearEquiv fun i => (f i).trans (f₂ i)) =
(mapRange.linearEquiv f).trans (mapRange.linearEquiv f₂) :=
LinearEquiv.ext <| mapRange_comp (fun i x => f₂ i x) (fun i x => f i x)
(fun i => (f₂ i).map_zero) (fun i => (f i).map_zero) (by simp)
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_equiv_trans DFinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv_trans
@[simp]
theorem mapRange.linearEquiv_symm (e : ∀ i, β₁ i ≃ₗ[R] β₂ i) :
(mapRange.linearEquiv e).symm = mapRange.linearEquiv fun i => (e i).symm :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range.linear_equiv_symm DFinsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv_symm
end mapRange
section CoprodMap
variable [DecidableEq ι] [∀ x : N, Decidable (x ≠ 0)]
/-- Given a family of linear maps `f i : M i →ₗ[R] N`, we can form a linear map
`(Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N` which sends `x : Π₀ i, M i` to the sum over `i` of `f i` applied to `x i`.
This is the map coming from the universal property of `Π₀ i, M i` as the coproduct of the `M i`.
See also `LinearMap.coprod` for the binary product version. -/
def coprodMap (f : ∀ i : ι, M i →ₗ[R] N) : (Π₀ i, M i) →ₗ[R] N :=
(DFinsupp.lsum ℕ fun _ : ι => LinearMap.id) ∘ₗ DFinsupp.mapRange.linearMap f
#align dfinsupp.coprod_map DFinsupp.coprodMap
theorem coprodMap_apply (f : ∀ i : ι, M i →ₗ[R] N) (x : Π₀ i, M i) :
coprodMap f x =
DFinsupp.sum (mapRange (fun i => f i) (fun _ => LinearMap.map_zero _) x) fun _ =>
id :=
DFinsupp.sumAddHom_apply _ _
#align dfinsupp.coprod_map_apply DFinsupp.coprodMap_apply
theorem coprodMap_apply_single (f : ∀ i : ι, M i →ₗ[R] N) (i : ι) (x : M i) :
coprodMap f (single i x) = f i x := by
simp [coprodMap]
end CoprodMap
end DFinsupp
namespace Submodule
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
open DFinsupp
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
theorem dfinsupp_sum_mem {β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Zero (β i)] [∀ (i) (x : β i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)]
(S : Submodule R N) (f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : ∀ i, β i → N) (h : ∀ c, f c ≠ 0 → g c (f c) ∈ S) :
f.sum g ∈ S :=
_root_.dfinsupp_sum_mem S f g h
#align submodule.dfinsupp_sum_mem Submodule.dfinsupp_sum_mem
theorem dfinsupp_sumAddHom_mem {β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddZeroClass (β i)] (S : Submodule R N)
(f : Π₀ i, β i) (g : ∀ i, β i →+ N) (h : ∀ c, f c ≠ 0 → g c (f c) ∈ S) :
DFinsupp.sumAddHom g f ∈ S :=
_root_.dfinsupp_sumAddHom_mem S f g h
#align submodule.dfinsupp_sum_add_hom_mem Submodule.dfinsupp_sumAddHom_mem
/-- The supremum of a family of submodules is equal to the range of `DFinsupp.lsum`; that is
every element in the `iSup` can be produced from taking a finite number of non-zero elements
of `p i`, coercing them to `N`, and summing them. -/
theorem iSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum (p : ι → Submodule R N) :
iSup p = LinearMap.range (DFinsupp.lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) fun i => (p i).subtype) := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply iSup_le _
intro i y hy
simp only [LinearMap.mem_range, lsum_apply_apply]
exact ⟨DFinsupp.single i ⟨y, hy⟩, DFinsupp.sumAddHom_single _ _ _⟩
· rintro x ⟨v, rfl⟩
exact dfinsupp_sumAddHom_mem _ v _ fun i _ => (le_iSup p i : p i ≤ _) (v i).2
#align submodule.supr_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum Submodule.iSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum
/-- The bounded supremum of a family of commutative additive submonoids is equal to the range of
`DFinsupp.sumAddHom` composed with `DFinsupp.filter_add_monoid_hom`; that is, every element in the
bounded `iSup` can be produced from taking a finite number of non-zero elements from the `S i` that
satisfy `p i`, coercing them to `γ`, and summing them. -/
theorem biSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (S : ι → Submodule R N) :
⨆ (i) (_ : p i), S i =
LinearMap.range
(LinearMap.comp
(DFinsupp.lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(S i)) (fun i => (S i).subtype))
(DFinsupp.filterLinearMap R _ p)) := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine iSup₂_le fun i hi y hy => ⟨DFinsupp.single i ⟨y, hy⟩, ?_⟩
rw [LinearMap.comp_apply, filterLinearMap_apply, filter_single_pos _ _ hi]
simp only [lsum_apply_apply, sumAddHom_single, LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe, coeSubtype]
· rintro x ⟨v, rfl⟩
refine dfinsupp_sumAddHom_mem _ _ _ fun i _ => ?_
refine mem_iSup_of_mem i ?_
by_cases hp : p i
· simp [hp]
· simp [hp]
#align submodule.bsupr_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum Submodule.biSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum
/-- A characterisation of the span of a family of submodules.
See also `Submodule.mem_iSup_iff_exists_finsupp`. -/
theorem mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp (p : ι → Submodule R N) (x : N) :
x ∈ iSup p ↔
∃ f : Π₀ i, p i, DFinsupp.lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) (fun i => (p i).subtype) f = x :=
SetLike.ext_iff.mp (iSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum p) x
#align submodule.mem_supr_iff_exists_dfinsupp Submodule.mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp
/-- A variant of `Submodule.mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp` with the RHS fully unfolded.
See also `Submodule.mem_iSup_iff_exists_finsupp`. -/
theorem mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp' (p : ι → Submodule R N) [∀ (i) (x : p i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)]
(x : N) : x ∈ iSup p ↔ ∃ f : Π₀ i, p i, (f.sum fun i xi => ↑xi) = x := by
rw [mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp]
simp_rw [DFinsupp.lsum_apply_apply, DFinsupp.sumAddHom_apply,
LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe, coeSubtype]
#align submodule.mem_supr_iff_exists_dfinsupp' Submodule.mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp'
theorem mem_biSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (S : ι → Submodule R N)
(x : N) :
(x ∈ ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), S i) ↔
∃ f : Π₀ i, S i,
DFinsupp.lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(S i)) (fun i => (S i).subtype) (f.filter p) = x :=
SetLike.ext_iff.mp (biSup_eq_range_dfinsupp_lsum p S) x
#align submodule.mem_bsupr_iff_exists_dfinsupp Submodule.mem_biSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp
end DecidableEq
lemma mem_iSup_iff_exists_finsupp (p : ι → Submodule R N) (x : N) :
x ∈ iSup p ↔ ∃ (f : ι →₀ N), (∀ i, f i ∈ p i) ∧ (f.sum fun _i xi ↦ xi) = x := by
classical
rw [mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp']
refine ⟨fun ⟨f, hf⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨f.support, fun i ↦ (f i : N), by simp⟩, by simp, hf⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩
refine ⟨DFinsupp.mk f.support fun i ↦ ⟨f i, hf i⟩, Finset.sum_congr ?_ fun i hi ↦ ?_⟩
· ext; simp
· simp [Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mp hi]
theorem mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum {s : Finset ι} (p : ι → Submodule R N) (a : N) :
(a ∈ ⨆ i ∈ s, p i) ↔ ∃ μ : ∀ i, p i, (∑ i ∈ s, (μ i : N)) = a := by
classical
rw [Submodule.mem_iSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp']
constructor <;> rintro ⟨μ, hμ⟩
· use fun i => ⟨μ i, (iSup_const_le : _ ≤ p i) (coe_mem <| μ i)⟩
rw [← hμ]
symm
apply Finset.sum_subset
· intro x
contrapose
intro hx
rw [mem_support_iff, not_ne_iff]
ext
rw [coe_zero, ← mem_bot R]
suffices ⊥ = ⨆ (_ : x ∈ s), p x from this.symm ▸ coe_mem (μ x)
exact (iSup_neg hx).symm
· intro x _ hx
rw [mem_support_iff, not_ne_iff] at hx
rw [hx]
rfl
· refine ⟨DFinsupp.mk s ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
refine ⟨μ i, ?_⟩
rw [iSup_pos]
· exact coe_mem _
· exact hi
simp only [DFinsupp.sum]
rw [Finset.sum_subset support_mk_subset, ← hμ]
· exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun x hx => congr_arg Subtype.val <| mk_of_mem hx
· intro x _ hx
rw [mem_support_iff, not_ne_iff] at hx
rw [hx]
rfl
#align submodule.mem_supr_finset_iff_exists_sum Submodule.mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum
end Submodule
namespace CompleteLattice
open DFinsupp
section Semiring
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
/-- Independence of a family of submodules can be expressed as a quantifier over `DFinsupp`s.
This is an intermediate result used to prove
`CompleteLattice.independent_of_dfinsupp_lsum_injective` and
`CompleteLattice.Independent.dfinsupp_lsum_injective`. -/
theorem independent_iff_forall_dfinsupp (p : ι → Submodule R N) :
Independent p ↔
∀ (i) (x : p i) (v : Π₀ i : ι, ↥(p i)),
lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) (fun i => (p i).subtype) (erase i v) = x → x = 0 := by
simp_rw [CompleteLattice.independent_def, Submodule.disjoint_def,
Submodule.mem_biSup_iff_exists_dfinsupp, exists_imp, filter_ne_eq_erase]
refine forall_congr' fun i => Subtype.forall'.trans ?_
simp_rw [Submodule.coe_eq_zero]
#align complete_lattice.independent_iff_forall_dfinsupp CompleteLattice.independent_iff_forall_dfinsupp
/- If `DFinsupp.lsum` applied with `Submodule.subtype` is injective then the submodules are
independent. -/
theorem independent_of_dfinsupp_lsum_injective (p : ι → Submodule R N)
(h : Function.Injective (lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) fun i => (p i).subtype)) :
Independent p := by
rw [independent_iff_forall_dfinsupp]
intro i x v hv
replace hv : lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) (fun i => (p i).subtype) (erase i v) =
lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) (fun i => (p i).subtype) (single i x) := by
simpa only [lsum_single] using hv
have := DFunLike.ext_iff.mp (h hv) i
simpa [eq_comm] using this
#align complete_lattice.independent_of_dfinsupp_lsum_injective CompleteLattice.independent_of_dfinsupp_lsum_injective
/- If `DFinsupp.sumAddHom` applied with `AddSubmonoid.subtype` is injective then the additive
submonoids are independent. -/
theorem independent_of_dfinsupp_sumAddHom_injective (p : ι → AddSubmonoid N)
(h : Function.Injective (sumAddHom fun i => (p i).subtype)) : Independent p := by
rw [← independent_map_orderIso_iff (AddSubmonoid.toNatSubmodule : AddSubmonoid N ≃o _)]
exact independent_of_dfinsupp_lsum_injective _ h
#align complete_lattice.independent_of_dfinsupp_sum_add_hom_injective CompleteLattice.independent_of_dfinsupp_sumAddHom_injective
/-- Combining `DFinsupp.lsum` with `LinearMap.toSpanSingleton` is the same as `Finsupp.total` -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/DFinsupp.lean | 463 | 471 | theorem lsum_comp_mapRange_toSpanSingleton [∀ m : R, Decidable (m ≠ 0)] (p : ι → Submodule R N)
{v : ι → N} (hv : ∀ i : ι, v i ∈ p i) :
(lsum ℕ (M := fun i ↦ ↥(p i)) fun i => (p i).subtype : _ →ₗ[R] _).comp
((mapRange.linearMap fun i => LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R (↥(p i)) ⟨v i, hv i⟩ :
_ →ₗ[R] _).comp
(finsuppLequivDFinsupp R : (ι →₀ R) ≃ₗ[R] _).toLinearMap) =
Finsupp.total ι N R v := by |
ext
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.EssSup
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_seminorm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# ℒp space
This file describes properties of almost everywhere strongly measurable functions with finite
`p`-seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ` and defined for `p:ℝ≥0∞` as `0` if `p=0`,
`(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and `essSup ‖f‖ μ` for `p=∞`.
The Prop-valued `Memℒp f p μ` states that a function `f : α → E` has finite `p`-seminorm
and is almost everywhere strongly measurable.
## Main definitions
* `snorm' f p μ` : `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `f : α → F` and `p : ℝ`, where `α` is a measurable
space and `F` is a normed group.
* `snormEssSup f μ` : seminorm in `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum `ess_sup ‖f‖ μ`.
* `snorm f p μ` : for `p : ℝ≥0∞`, seminorm in `ℒp`, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `snorm' f p μ`
for `0 < p < ∞` and to `snormEssSup f μ` for `p = ∞`.
* `Memℒp f p μ` : property that the function `f` is almost everywhere strongly measurable and has
finite `p`-seminorm for the measure `μ` (`snorm f p μ < ∞`)
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
section ℒp
/-!
### ℒp seminorm
We define the ℒp seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ`. For real `p`, it is given by an integral
formula (for which we use the notation `snorm' f p μ`), and for `p = ∞` it is the essential
supremum (for which we use the notation `snormEssSup f μ`).
We also define a predicate `Memℒp f p μ`, requesting that a function is almost everywhere
measurable and has finite `snorm f p μ`.
This paragraph is devoted to the basic properties of these definitions. It is constructed as
follows: for a given property, we prove it for `snorm'` and `snormEssSup` when it makes sense,
deduce it for `snorm`, and translate it in terms of `Memℒp`.
-/
section ℒpSpaceDefinition
/-- `(∫ ‖f a‖^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)`, which is a seminorm on the space of measurable functions for which
this quantity is finite -/
def snorm' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q)
#align measure_theory.snorm' MeasureTheory.snorm'
/-- seminorm for `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum of `‖f‖`. -/
def snormEssSup {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (μ : Measure α) :=
essSup (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup MeasureTheory.snormEssSup
/-- `ℒp` seminorm, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and to
`essSup ‖f‖ μ` for `p = ∞`. -/
def snorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p = 0 then 0 else if p = ∞ then snormEssSup f μ else snorm' f (ENNReal.toReal p) μ
#align measure_theory.snorm MeasureTheory.snorm
theorem snorm_eq_snorm' (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = snorm' f (ENNReal.toReal p) μ := by simp [snorm, hp_ne_zero, hp_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_snorm' MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_snorm'
theorem snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = (∫⁻ x, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm
theorem snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {f : α → F} : snorm f 1 μ = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm one_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ENNReal.one_toReal,
one_div_one, ENNReal.rpow_one]
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 102 | 102 | theorem snorm_exponent_top {f : α → F} : snorm f ∞ μ = snormEssSup f μ := by | simp [snorm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
#align_import analysis.calculus.iterated_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# One-dimensional iterated derivatives
We define the `n`-th derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` as a function
`iteratedDeriv n f : 𝕜 → F`, as well as a version on domains `iteratedDerivWithin n f s : 𝕜 → F`,
and prove their basic properties.
## Main definitions and results
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field, and `F` a normed vector space over `𝕜`. Let `f : 𝕜 → F`.
* `iteratedDeriv n f` is the `n`-th derivative of `f`, seen as a function from `𝕜` to `F`.
It is defined as the `n`-th Fréchet derivative (which is a multilinear map) applied to the
vector `(1, ..., 1)`, to take advantage of all the existing framework, but we show that it
coincides with the naive iterative definition.
* `iteratedDeriv_eq_iterate` states that the `n`-th derivative of `f` is obtained by starting
from `f` and differentiating it `n` times.
* `iteratedDerivWithin n f s` is the `n`-th derivative of `f` within the domain `s`. It only
behaves well when `s` has the unique derivative property.
* `iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate` states that the `n`-th derivative of `f` in the domain `s` is
obtained by starting from `f` and differentiating it `n` times within `s`. This only holds when
`s` has the unique derivative property.
## Implementation details
The results are deduced from the corresponding results for the more general (multilinear) iterated
Fréchet derivative. For this, we write `iteratedDeriv n f` as the composition of
`iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f` and a continuous linear equiv. As continuous linear equivs respect
differentiability and commute with differentiation, this makes it possible to prove readily that
the derivative of the `n`-th derivative is the `n+1`-th derivative in `iteratedDerivWithin_succ`,
by translating the corresponding result `iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left` for the
iterated Fréchet derivative.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology
open Filter Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative of a function from `𝕜` to `F`, as a function from `𝕜` to `F`. -/
def iteratedDeriv (n : ℕ) (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) : F :=
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1
#align iterated_deriv iteratedDeriv
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative of a function from `𝕜` to `F` within a set `s`, as a function
from `𝕜` to `F`. -/
def iteratedDerivWithin (n : ℕ) (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) : F :=
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1
#align iterated_deriv_within iteratedDerivWithin
variable {n : ℕ} {f : 𝕜 → F} {s : Set 𝕜} {x : 𝕜}
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_univ : iteratedDerivWithin n f univ = iteratedDeriv n f := by
ext x
rw [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedDeriv, iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
#align iterated_deriv_within_univ iteratedDerivWithin_univ
/-! ### Properties of the iterated derivative within a set -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin : iteratedDerivWithin n f s x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1 :=
rfl
#align iterated_deriv_within_eq_iterated_fderiv_within iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin
/-- Write the iterated derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the iterated
Fréchet derivative -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedDerivWithin n f s =
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F).symm ∘ iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s := by
ext x; rfl
#align iterated_deriv_within_eq_equiv_comp iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp
/-- Write the iterated Fréchet derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the
iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s =
ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F ∘ iteratedDerivWithin n f s := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, ← Function.comp.assoc, LinearIsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm,
Function.id_comp]
#align iterated_fderiv_within_eq_equiv_comp iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp
/-- The `n`-th Fréchet derivative applied to a vector `(m 0, ..., m (n-1))` is the derivative
multiplied by the product of the `m i`s. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_apply_eq_iteratedDerivWithin_mul_prod {m : Fin n → 𝕜} :
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) m =
(∏ i, m i) • iteratedDerivWithin n f s x := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin, ← ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_smul_univ]
simp
#align iterated_fderiv_within_apply_eq_iterated_deriv_within_mul_prod iteratedFDerivWithin_apply_eq_iteratedDerivWithin_mul_prod
theorem norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_norm_iteratedDerivWithin :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x‖ = ‖iteratedDerivWithin n f s x‖ := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
#align norm_iterated_fderiv_within_eq_norm_iterated_deriv_within norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_norm_iteratedDerivWithin
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_zero : iteratedDerivWithin 0 f s = f := by
ext x
simp [iteratedDerivWithin]
#align iterated_deriv_within_zero iteratedDerivWithin_zero
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_one {x : 𝕜} (h : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
iteratedDerivWithin 1 f s x = derivWithin f s x := by
simp only [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin_one_apply h]; rfl
#align iterated_deriv_within_one iteratedDerivWithin_one
/-- If the first `n` derivatives within a set of a function are continuous, and its first `n-1`
derivatives are differentiable, then the function is `C^n`. This is not an equivalence in general,
but this is an equivalence when the set has unique derivatives, see
`contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞}
(Hcont : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedDerivWithin m f s x) s)
(Hdiff : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedDerivWithin m f s x) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
apply contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn
· simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff]
· simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
#align cont_diff_on_of_continuous_on_differentiable_on_deriv contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv
/-- To check that a function is `n` times continuously differentiable, it suffices to check that its
first `n` derivatives are differentiable. This is slightly too strong as the condition we
require on the `n`-th derivative is differentiability instead of continuity, but it has the
advantage of avoiding the discussion of continuity in the proof (and for `n = ∞` this is optimal).
-/
theorem contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞}
(h : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
apply contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn
simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
#align cont_diff_on_of_differentiable_on_deriv contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn_deriv
/-- On a set with unique derivatives, a `C^n` function has derivatives up to `n` which are
continuous. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_iteratedDerivWithin {n : ℕ∞} {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) : ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
simpa only [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff] using
h.continuousOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hmn hs
#align cont_diff_on.continuous_on_iterated_deriv_within ContDiffOn.continuousOn_iteratedDerivWithin
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin {n : ℕ∞} {m : ℕ}
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : (m : ℕ∞) < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (insert x s)) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s x := by
simpa only [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff] using
h.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedFDerivWithin hmn hs
#align cont_diff_within_at.differentiable_within_at_iterated_deriv_within ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin
/-- On a set with unique derivatives, a `C^n` function has derivatives less than `n` which are
differentiable. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn_iteratedDerivWithin {n : ℕ∞} {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : (m : ℕ∞) < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin hmn <| by rwa [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
#align cont_diff_on.differentiable_on_iterated_deriv_within ContDiffOn.differentiableOn_iteratedDerivWithin
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative on sets with unique derivatives. -/
theorem contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ (∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
simp only [contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn hs, iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
#align cont_diff_on_iff_continuous_on_differentiable_on_deriv contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv
/-- The `n+1`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
differentiating the `n`-th iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_succ {x : 𝕜} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x = derivWithin (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left,
iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hxs, derivWithin]
change ((ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 (Fin n) ((fderivWithin 𝕜
(iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x : 𝕜 → F) 1) : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun i : Fin n => 1) =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x : 𝕜 → F) 1
simp
#align iterated_deriv_within_succ iteratedDerivWithin_succ
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
iterating `n` times the differentiation operation. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate {x : 𝕜} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iteratedDerivWithin n f s x = (fun g : 𝕜 → F => derivWithin g s)^[n] f x := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing x
· simp
· rw [iteratedDerivWithin_succ (hs x hx), Function.iterate_succ']
exact derivWithin_congr (fun y hy => IH hy) (IH hx)
#align iterated_deriv_within_eq_iterate iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate
/-- The `n+1`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
taking the `n`-th derivative of the derivative. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_succ' {x : 𝕜} (hxs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x = (iteratedDerivWithin n (derivWithin f s) s) x := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate hxs hx, iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate hxs hx]; rfl
#align iterated_deriv_within_succ' iteratedDerivWithin_succ'
/-! ### Properties of the iterated derivative on the whole space -/
theorem iteratedDeriv_eq_iteratedFDeriv :
iteratedDeriv n f x = (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1 :=
rfl
#align iterated_deriv_eq_iterated_fderiv iteratedDeriv_eq_iteratedFDeriv
/-- Write the iterated derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the iterated
Fréchet derivative -/
theorem iteratedDeriv_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedDeriv n f =
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F).symm ∘ iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f := by
ext x; rfl
#align iterated_deriv_eq_equiv_comp iteratedDeriv_eq_equiv_comp
/-- Write the iterated Fréchet derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the
iterated derivative. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/IteratedDeriv/Defs.lean | 228 | 231 | theorem iteratedFDeriv_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f =
ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F ∘ iteratedDeriv n f := by |
rw [iteratedDeriv_eq_equiv_comp, ← Function.comp.assoc, LinearIsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm,
Function.id_comp]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.localization.ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e7f0ddbf65bd7181a85edb74b64bdc35ba4bdc74"
/-!
# Ideals in localizations of commutative rings
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
namespace IsLocalization
section CommSemiring
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (M : Submonoid R) (S : Type*) [CommSemiring S]
variable [Algebra R S] [IsLocalization M S]
/-- Explicit characterization of the ideal given by `Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) I`.
In practice, this ideal differs only in that the carrier set is defined explicitly.
This definition is only meant to be used in proving `mem_map_algebraMap_iff`,
and any proof that needs to refer to the explicit carrier set should use that theorem. -/
private def map_ideal (I : Ideal R) : Ideal S where
carrier := { z : S | ∃ x : I × M, z * algebraMap R S x.2 = algebraMap R S x.1 }
zero_mem' := ⟨⟨0, 1⟩, by simp⟩
add_mem' := by
rintro a b ⟨a', ha⟩ ⟨b', hb⟩
let Z : { x // x ∈ I } := ⟨(a'.2 : R) * (b'.1 : R) + (b'.2 : R) * (a'.1 : R),
I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left _ b'.1.2) (I.mul_mem_left _ a'.1.2)⟩
use ⟨Z, a'.2 * b'.2⟩
simp only [RingHom.map_add, Submodule.coe_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul, RingHom.map_mul]
rw [add_mul, ← mul_assoc a, ha, mul_comm (algebraMap R S a'.2) (algebraMap R S b'.2), ←
mul_assoc b, hb]
ring
smul_mem' := by
rintro c x ⟨x', hx⟩
obtain ⟨c', hc⟩ := IsLocalization.surj M c
let Z : { x // x ∈ I } := ⟨c'.1 * x'.1, I.mul_mem_left c'.1 x'.1.2⟩
use ⟨Z, c'.2 * x'.2⟩
simp only [← hx, ← hc, smul_eq_mul, Submodule.coe_mk, Submonoid.coe_mul, RingHom.map_mul]
ring
-- Porting note: removed #align declaration since it is a private def
theorem mem_map_algebraMap_iff {I : Ideal R} {z} : z ∈ Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) I ↔
∃ x : I × M, z * algebraMap R S x.2 = algebraMap R S x.1 := by
constructor
· change _ → z ∈ map_ideal M S I
refine fun h => Ideal.mem_sInf.1 h fun z hz => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hz
let Z : { x // x ∈ I } := ⟨y, hy.left⟩
use ⟨Z, 1⟩
simp [hy.right]
· rintro ⟨⟨a, s⟩, h⟩
rw [← Ideal.unit_mul_mem_iff_mem _ (map_units S s), mul_comm]
exact h.symm ▸ Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _ a.2
#align is_localization.mem_map_algebra_map_iff IsLocalization.mem_map_algebraMap_iff
theorem map_comap (J : Ideal S) : Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) (Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) J) = J :=
le_antisymm (Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.2 le_rfl) fun x hJ => by
obtain ⟨r, s, hx⟩ := mk'_surjective M x
rw [← hx] at hJ ⊢
exact
Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _
(Ideal.mem_map_of_mem _
(show (algebraMap R S) r ∈ J from
mk'_spec S r s ▸ J.mul_mem_right ((algebraMap R S) s) hJ))
#align is_localization.map_comap IsLocalization.map_comap
theorem comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint (I : Ideal R) (hI : I.IsPrime) (hM : Disjoint (M : Set R) I) :
Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) (Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) I) = I := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ Ideal.le_comap_map
refine (fun a ha => ?_)
obtain ⟨⟨b, s⟩, h⟩ := (mem_map_algebraMap_iff M S).1 (Ideal.mem_comap.1 ha)
replace h : algebraMap R S (s * a) = algebraMap R S b := by
simpa only [← map_mul, mul_comm] using h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := (eq_iff_exists M S).1 h
have : ↑c * ↑s * a ∈ I := by
rw [mul_assoc, hc]
exact I.mul_mem_left c b.2
exact (hI.mem_or_mem this).resolve_left fun hsc => hM.le_bot ⟨(c * s).2, hsc⟩
#align is_localization.comap_map_of_is_prime_disjoint IsLocalization.comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint
/-- If `S` is the localization of `R` at a submonoid, the ordering of ideals of `S` is
embedded in the ordering of ideals of `R`. -/
def orderEmbedding : Ideal S ↪o Ideal R where
toFun J := Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) J
inj' := Function.LeftInverse.injective (map_comap M S)
map_rel_iff' := by
rintro J₁ J₂
constructor
· exact fun hJ => (map_comap M S) J₁ ▸ (map_comap M S) J₂ ▸ Ideal.map_mono hJ
· exact fun hJ => Ideal.comap_mono hJ
#align is_localization.order_embedding IsLocalization.orderEmbedding
/-- If `R` is a ring, then prime ideals in the localization at `M`
correspond to prime ideals in the original ring `R` that are disjoint from `M`.
This lemma gives the particular case for an ideal and its comap,
see `le_rel_iso_of_prime` for the more general relation isomorphism -/
theorem isPrime_iff_isPrime_disjoint (J : Ideal S) :
J.IsPrime ↔
(Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) J).IsPrime ∧
Disjoint (M : Set R) ↑(Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) J) := by
constructor
· refine fun h =>
⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩,
Set.disjoint_left.mpr fun m hm1 hm2 =>
h.ne_top (Ideal.eq_top_of_isUnit_mem _ hm2 (map_units S ⟨m, hm1⟩))⟩
· refine fun hJ => h.ne_top ?_
rw [eq_top_iff, ← (orderEmbedding M S).le_iff_le]
exact le_of_eq hJ.symm
· intro x y hxy
rw [Ideal.mem_comap, RingHom.map_mul] at hxy
exact h.mem_or_mem hxy
· refine fun h => ⟨fun hJ => h.left.ne_top (eq_top_iff.2 ?_), ?_⟩
· rwa [eq_top_iff, ← (orderEmbedding M S).le_iff_le] at hJ
· intro x y hxy
obtain ⟨a, s, ha⟩ := mk'_surjective M x
obtain ⟨b, t, hb⟩ := mk'_surjective M y
have : mk' S (a * b) (s * t) ∈ J := by rwa [mk'_mul, ha, hb]
rw [mk'_mem_iff, ← Ideal.mem_comap] at this
have this₂ := (h.1).mul_mem_iff_mem_or_mem.1 this
rw [Ideal.mem_comap, Ideal.mem_comap] at this₂
rwa [← ha, ← hb, mk'_mem_iff, mk'_mem_iff]
#align is_localization.is_prime_iff_is_prime_disjoint IsLocalization.isPrime_iff_isPrime_disjoint
/-- If `R` is a ring, then prime ideals in the localization at `M`
correspond to prime ideals in the original ring `R` that are disjoint from `M`.
This lemma gives the particular case for an ideal and its map,
see `le_rel_iso_of_prime` for the more general relation isomorphism, and the reverse implication -/
theorem isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint (I : Ideal R) (hp : I.IsPrime) (hd : Disjoint (M : Set R) ↑I) :
(Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) I).IsPrime := by
rw [isPrime_iff_isPrime_disjoint M S, comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint M S I hp hd]
exact ⟨hp, hd⟩
#align is_localization.is_prime_of_is_prime_disjoint IsLocalization.isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint
/-- If `R` is a ring, then prime ideals in the localization at `M`
correspond to prime ideals in the original ring `R` that are disjoint from `M` -/
def orderIsoOfPrime :
{ p : Ideal S // p.IsPrime } ≃o { p : Ideal R // p.IsPrime ∧ Disjoint (M : Set R) ↑p } where
toFun p := ⟨Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) p.1, (isPrime_iff_isPrime_disjoint M S p.1).1 p.2⟩
invFun p := ⟨Ideal.map (algebraMap R S) p.1, isPrime_of_isPrime_disjoint M S p.1 p.2.1 p.2.2⟩
left_inv J := Subtype.eq (map_comap M S J)
right_inv I := Subtype.eq (comap_map_of_isPrime_disjoint M S I.1 I.2.1 I.2.2)
map_rel_iff' := by
rintro I I'
constructor
· exact (fun h => show I.val ≤ I'.val from map_comap M S I.val ▸
map_comap M S I'.val ▸ Ideal.map_mono h)
exact fun h x hx => h hx
#align is_localization.order_iso_of_prime IsLocalization.orderIsoOfPrime
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] [IsLocalization M S]
/-- `quotientMap` applied to maximal ideals of a localization is `surjective`.
The quotient by a maximal ideal is a field, so inverses to elements already exist,
and the localization necessarily maps the equivalence class of the inverse in the localization -/
theorem surjective_quotientMap_of_maximal_of_localization {I : Ideal S} [I.IsPrime] {J : Ideal R}
{H : J ≤ I.comap (algebraMap R S)} (hI : (I.comap (algebraMap R S)).IsMaximal) :
Function.Surjective (Ideal.quotientMap I (algebraMap R S) H) := by
intro s
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective s
obtain ⟨r, ⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩ := mk'_surjective M s
by_cases hM : (Ideal.Quotient.mk (I.comap (algebraMap R S))) m = 0
· have : I = ⊤ := by
rw [Ideal.eq_top_iff_one]
rw [Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, Ideal.mem_comap] at hM
convert I.mul_mem_right (mk' S (1 : R) ⟨m, hm⟩) hM
rw [← mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mk'_self]
exact ⟨0, eq_comm.1 (by simp [Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, this])⟩
· rw [Ideal.Quotient.maximal_ideal_iff_isField_quotient] at hI
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := hI.3 hM
obtain ⟨rn, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective n
refine ⟨(Ideal.Quotient.mk J) (r * rn), ?_⟩
-- The rest of the proof is essentially just algebraic manipulations to prove the equality
replace hn := congr_arg (Ideal.quotientMap I (algebraMap R S) le_rfl) hn
rw [RingHom.map_one, RingHom.map_mul] at hn
rw [Ideal.quotientMap_mk, ← sub_eq_zero, ← RingHom.map_sub, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ←
Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_sub, sub_eq_zero, mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one]
simp only [mul_eq_mul_left_iff, RingHom.map_mul]
refine
Or.inl
(mul_left_cancel₀ (M₀ := S ⧸ I)
(fun hn =>
hM
(Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2
(Ideal.mem_comap.2 (Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.1 hn))))
(_root_.trans hn ?_))
-- Porting note (#10691): was `rw`, but this took extremely long.
refine Eq.trans ?_ (RingHom.map_mul (Ideal.Quotient.mk I) (algebraMap R S m) (mk' S 1 ⟨m, hm⟩))
rw [← mk'_eq_mul_mk'_one, mk'_self, RingHom.map_one]
#align is_localization.surjective_quotient_map_of_maximal_of_localization IsLocalization.surjective_quotientMap_of_maximal_of_localization
open nonZeroDivisors
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Ideal.lean | 209 | 214 | theorem bot_lt_comap_prime [IsDomain R] (hM : M ≤ R⁰) (p : Ideal S) [hpp : p.IsPrime]
(hp0 : p ≠ ⊥) : ⊥ < Ideal.comap (algebraMap R S) p := by |
haveI : IsDomain S := isDomain_of_le_nonZeroDivisors _ hM
rw [← Ideal.comap_bot_of_injective (algebraMap R S) (IsLocalization.injective _ hM)]
convert (orderIsoOfPrime M S).lt_iff_lt.mpr (show (⟨⊥, Ideal.bot_prime⟩ :
{ p : Ideal S // p.IsPrime }) < ⟨p, hpp⟩ from hp0.bot_lt)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.functor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d7987cda72abc473c7cdbbb075170e9ac620042"
/-!
# (Lax) monoidal functors
A lax monoidal functor `F` between monoidal categories `C` and `D`
is a functor between the underlying categories equipped with morphisms
* `ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` (called the unit morphism)
* `μ X Y : (F.obj X) ⊗ (F.obj Y) ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)` (called the tensorator, or strength).
satisfying various axioms.
A monoidal functor is a lax monoidal functor for which `ε` and `μ` are isomorphisms.
We show that the composition of (lax) monoidal functors gives a (lax) monoidal functor.
See also `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functorial` for a typeclass decorating an object-level
function with the additional data of a monoidal functor.
This is useful when stating that a pre-existing functor is monoidal.
See `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation` for monoidal natural transformations.
We show in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Mon_` that lax monoidal functors take monoid objects
to monoid objects.
## References
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFL>.
-/
open CategoryTheory
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace CategoryTheory
section
open MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} D]
[MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D]
-- The direction of `left_unitality` and `right_unitality` as simp lemmas may look strange:
-- remember the rule of thumb that component indices of natural transformations
-- "weigh more" than structural maps.
-- (However by this argument `associativity` is currently stated backwards!)
/-- A lax monoidal functor is a functor `F : C ⥤ D` between monoidal categories,
equipped with morphisms `ε : 𝟙 _D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C)` and `μ X Y : F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y)`,
satisfying the appropriate coherences. -/
structure LaxMonoidalFunctor extends C ⥤ D where
/-- unit morphism -/
ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ obj (𝟙_ C)
/-- tensorator -/
μ : ∀ X Y : C, obj X ⊗ obj Y ⟶ obj (X ⊗ Y)
μ_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
map f ▷ obj X' ≫ μ Y X' = μ X X' ≫ map (f ▷ X') := by
aesop_cat
μ_natural_right :
∀ {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) ,
obj X' ◁ map f ≫ μ X' Y = μ X' X ≫ map (X' ◁ f) := by
aesop_cat
/-- associativity of the tensorator -/
associativity :
∀ X Y Z : C,
μ X Y ▷ obj Z ≫ μ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (obj X) (obj Y) (obj Z)).hom ≫ obj X ◁ μ Y Z ≫ μ X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat
-- unitality
left_unitality : ∀ X : C, (λ_ (obj X)).hom = ε ▷ obj X ≫ μ (𝟙_ C) X ≫ map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
right_unitality : ∀ X : C, (ρ_ (obj X)).hom = obj X ◁ ε ≫ μ X (𝟙_ C) ≫ map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
-- We keep this to be consistent with Lean 3.
-- See also `initialize_simps_projections MonoidalFunctor` below.
-- This may require waiting on https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/2936
initialize_simps_projections LaxMonoidalFunctor (+toFunctor, -obj, -map)
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right
attribute [simp] LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality
attribute [simp] LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity
-- When `rewrite_search` lands, add @[search] attributes to
-- LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality
-- LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity
section
variable {C D}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) {X Y X' Y' : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ F.μ Y Y' = F.μ X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
/--
A constructor for lax monoidal functors whose axioms are described by `tensorHom` instead of
`whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight`.
-/
@[simps]
def LaxMonoidalFunctor.ofTensorHom (F : C ⥤ D)
/- unit morphism -/
(ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C))
/- tensorator -/
(μ : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y))
(μ_natural :
∀ {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y'),
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ Y Y' = μ X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
aesop_cat)
/- associativity of the tensorator -/
(associativity :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(μ X Y ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj Z)) ≫ μ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ μ Y Z) ≫ μ X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat)
/- unitality -/
(left_unitality :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (ε ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj X)) ≫ μ (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat)
(right_unitality :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ ε) ≫ μ X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat) :
LaxMonoidalFunctor C D where
obj := F.obj
map := F.map
map_id := F.map_id
map_comp := F.map_comp
ε := ε
μ := μ
μ_natural_left := fun f X' => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← F.map_id, μ_natural]
μ_natural_right := fun X' f => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, ← F.map_id, μ_natural]
associativity := fun X Y Z => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom, associativity]
left_unitality := fun X => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, left_unitality]
right_unitality := fun X => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, right_unitality]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality_inv (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.ε ▷ F.obj X ≫ F.μ (𝟙_ C) X = F.map (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, F.left_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.toFunctor.map_id, comp_id]
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor.left_unitality_inv CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality_inv (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.obj X ◁ F.ε ≫ F.μ X (𝟙_ C) = F.map (ρ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, F.right_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.toFunctor.map_id, comp_id]
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor.right_unitality_inv CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Functor.lean | 178 | 182 | theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity_inv (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) (X Y Z : C) :
F.obj X ◁ F.μ Y Z ≫ F.μ X (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).inv ≫ F.μ X Y ▷ F.obj Z ≫ F.μ (X ⊗ Y) Z := by |
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, ← F.associativity_assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id,
F.toFunctor.map_id, comp_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Conditional
#align_import probability.independence.zero_one from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f8347015b12b0864dfaf366ec4909eb70c78740"
/-!
# Kolmogorov's 0-1 law
Let `s : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω` be an independent sequence of sub-σ-algebras. Then any set which
is measurable with respect to the tail σ-algebra `limsup s atTop` has probability 0 or 1.
## Main statements
* `measure_zero_or_one_of_measurableSet_limsup_atTop`: Kolmogorov's 0-1 law. Any set which is
measurable with respect to the tail σ-algebra `limsup s atTop` of an independent sequence of
σ-algebras `s` has probability 0 or 1.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α Ω ι : Type*} {_mα : MeasurableSpace α} {s : ι → MeasurableSpace Ω}
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {κ : kernel α Ω} {μα : Measure α} {μ : Measure Ω}
theorem kernel.measure_eq_zero_or_one_or_top_of_indepSet_self {t : Set Ω}
(h_indep : kernel.IndepSet t t κ μα) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μα, κ a t = 0 ∨ κ a t = 1 ∨ κ a t = ∞ := by
specialize h_indep t t (measurableSet_generateFrom (Set.mem_singleton t))
(measurableSet_generateFrom (Set.mem_singleton t))
filter_upwards [h_indep] with a ha
by_cases h0 : κ a t = 0
· exact Or.inl h0
by_cases h_top : κ a t = ∞
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr h_top)
rw [← one_mul (κ a (t ∩ t)), Set.inter_self, ENNReal.mul_eq_mul_right h0 h_top] at ha
exact Or.inr (Or.inl ha.symm)
theorem measure_eq_zero_or_one_or_top_of_indepSet_self {t : Set Ω}
(h_indep : IndepSet t t μ) : μ t = 0 ∨ μ t = 1 ∨ μ t = ∞ := by
simpa only [ae_dirac_eq, Filter.eventually_pure]
using kernel.measure_eq_zero_or_one_or_top_of_indepSet_self h_indep
#align probability_theory.measure_eq_zero_or_one_or_top_of_indep_set_self ProbabilityTheory.measure_eq_zero_or_one_or_top_of_indepSet_self
theorem kernel.measure_eq_zero_or_one_of_indepSet_self [∀ a, IsFiniteMeasure (κ a)] {t : Set Ω}
(h_indep : IndepSet t t κ μα) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μα, κ a t = 0 ∨ κ a t = 1 := by
filter_upwards [measure_eq_zero_or_one_or_top_of_indepSet_self h_indep] with a h_0_1_top
simpa only [measure_ne_top (κ a), or_false] using h_0_1_top
theorem measure_eq_zero_or_one_of_indepSet_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {t : Set Ω}
(h_indep : IndepSet t t μ) : μ t = 0 ∨ μ t = 1 := by
simpa only [ae_dirac_eq, Filter.eventually_pure]
using kernel.measure_eq_zero_or_one_of_indepSet_self h_indep
#align probability_theory.measure_eq_zero_or_one_of_indep_set_self ProbabilityTheory.measure_eq_zero_or_one_of_indepSet_self
| Mathlib/Probability/Independence/ZeroOne.lean | 64 | 74 | theorem condexp_eq_zero_or_one_of_condIndepSet_self
[StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
(hm : m ≤ m0) [hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ] {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h_indep : CondIndepSet m hm t t μ) :
∀ᵐ ω ∂μ, (μ⟦t | m⟧) ω = 0 ∨ (μ⟦t | m⟧) ω = 1 := by |
have h := ae_of_ae_trim hm (kernel.measure_eq_zero_or_one_of_indepSet_self h_indep)
filter_upwards [condexpKernel_ae_eq_condexp hm ht, h] with ω hω_eq hω
rw [← hω_eq, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, ENNReal.toReal_eq_one_iff]
cases hω with
| inl h => exact Or.inl (Or.inl h)
| inr h => exact Or.inr h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.strict from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84dc0bd6619acaea625086d6f53cb35cdd554219"
/-!
# Strictly convex sets
This file defines strictly convex sets.
A set is strictly convex if the open segment between any two distinct points lies in its interior.
-/
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 𝕝 E F β : Type*}
open Function Set
open Convex
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜)
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (s : Set E)
/-- A set is strictly convex if the open segment between any two distinct points lies is in its
interior. This basically means "convex and not flat on the boundary". -/
def StrictConvex : Prop :=
s.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ interior s
#align strict_convex StrictConvex
variable {𝕜 s}
variable {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜}
theorem strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s ↔ s.Pairwise fun x y => openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => (openSegment_subset_iff 𝕜).symm
#align strict_convex_iff_open_segment_subset strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset
theorem StrictConvex.openSegment_subset (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(h : x ≠ y) : openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s :=
strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset.1 hs hx hy h
#align strict_convex.open_segment_subset StrictConvex.openSegment_subset
theorem strictConvex_empty : StrictConvex 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) :=
pairwise_empty _
#align strict_convex_empty strictConvex_empty
theorem strictConvex_univ : StrictConvex 𝕜 (univ : Set E) := by
intro x _ y _ _ a b _ _ _
rw [interior_univ]
exact mem_univ _
#align strict_convex_univ strictConvex_univ
protected nonrec theorem StrictConvex.eq (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (h : a • x + b • y ∉ interior s) : x = y :=
hs.eq hx hy fun H => h <| H ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.eq StrictConvex.eq
protected theorem StrictConvex.inter {t : Set E} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (ht : StrictConvex 𝕜 t) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (s ∩ t) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
rw [interior_inter]
exact ⟨hs hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab, ht hx.2 hy.2 hxy ha hb hab⟩
#align strict_convex.inter StrictConvex.inter
theorem Directed.strictConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(hs : ∀ ⦃i : ι⦄, StrictConvex 𝕜 (s i)) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hx hy
obtain ⟨i, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨j, hy⟩ := hy
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hdir i j
exact interior_mono (subset_iUnion s k) (hs (hik hx) (hjk hy) hxy ha hb hab)
#align directed.strict_convex_Union Directed.strictConvex_iUnion
theorem DirectedOn.strictConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hdir : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StrictConvex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact (directedOn_iff_directed.1 hdir).strictConvex_iUnion fun s => hS _ s.2
#align directed_on.strict_convex_sUnion DirectedOn.strictConvex_sUnion
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F] {s : Set E}
protected theorem StrictConvex.convex (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) : Convex 𝕜 s :=
convex_iff_pairwise_pos.2 fun _ hx _ hy hxy _ _ ha hb hab =>
interior_subset <| hs hx hy hxy ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.convex StrictConvex.convex
/-- An open convex set is strictly convex. -/
protected theorem Convex.strictConvex_of_isOpen (h : IsOpen s) (hs : Convex 𝕜 s) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s :=
fun _ hx _ hy _ _ _ ha hb hab => h.interior_eq.symm ▸ hs hx hy ha.le hb.le hab
#align convex.strict_convex_of_open Convex.strictConvex_of_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.strictConvex_iff (h : IsOpen s) : StrictConvex 𝕜 s ↔ Convex 𝕜 s :=
⟨StrictConvex.convex, Convex.strictConvex_of_isOpen h⟩
#align is_open.strict_convex_iff IsOpen.strictConvex_iff
theorem strictConvex_singleton (c : E) : StrictConvex 𝕜 ({c} : Set E) :=
pairwise_singleton _ _
#align strict_convex_singleton strictConvex_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.strictConvex (hs : s.Subsingleton) : StrictConvex 𝕜 s :=
hs.pairwise _
#align set.subsingleton.strict_convex Set.Subsingleton.strictConvex
theorem StrictConvex.linear_image [Semiring 𝕝] [Module 𝕝 E] [Module 𝕝 F]
[LinearMap.CompatibleSMul E F 𝕜 𝕝] (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕝] F) (hf : IsOpenMap f) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩ hxy a b ha hb hab
refine hf.image_interior_subset _ ⟨a • x + b • y, hs hx hy (ne_of_apply_ne _ hxy) ha hb hab, ?_⟩
rw [map_add, f.map_smul_of_tower a, f.map_smul_of_tower b]
#align strict_convex.linear_image StrictConvex.linear_image
theorem StrictConvex.is_linear_image (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F} (h : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f)
(hf : IsOpenMap f) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (f '' s) :=
hs.linear_image (h.mk' f) hf
#align strict_convex.is_linear_image StrictConvex.is_linear_image
theorem StrictConvex.linear_preimage {s : Set F} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F)
(hf : Continuous f) (hfinj : Injective f) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (s.preimage f) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
refine preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hf ?_
rw [mem_preimage, f.map_add, f.map_smul, f.map_smul]
exact hs hx hy (hfinj.ne hxy) ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.linear_preimage StrictConvex.linear_preimage
theorem StrictConvex.is_linear_preimage {s : Set F} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) {f : E → F}
(h : IsLinearMap 𝕜 f) (hf : Continuous f) (hfinj : Injective f) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (s.preimage f) :=
hs.linear_preimage (h.mk' f) hf hfinj
#align strict_convex.is_linear_preimage StrictConvex.is_linear_preimage
section LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
variable [TopologicalSpace β] [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid β] [OrderTopology β] [Module 𝕜 β]
[OrderedSMul 𝕜 β]
protected theorem Set.OrdConnected.strictConvex {s : Set β} (hs : OrdConnected s) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s := by
refine strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset.2 fun x hx y hy hxy => ?_
cases' hxy.lt_or_lt with hlt hlt <;> [skip; rw [openSegment_symm]] <;>
exact
(openSegment_subset_Ioo hlt).trans
(isOpen_Ioo.subset_interior_iff.2 <| Ioo_subset_Icc_self.trans <| hs.out ‹_› ‹_›)
#align set.ord_connected.strict_convex Set.OrdConnected.strictConvex
theorem strictConvex_Iic (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Iic r) :=
ordConnected_Iic.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Iic strictConvex_Iic
theorem strictConvex_Ici (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ici r) :=
ordConnected_Ici.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ici strictConvex_Ici
theorem strictConvex_Iio (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Iio r) :=
ordConnected_Iio.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Iio strictConvex_Iio
theorem strictConvex_Ioi (r : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ioi r) :=
ordConnected_Ioi.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ioi strictConvex_Ioi
theorem strictConvex_Icc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Icc r s) :=
ordConnected_Icc.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Icc strictConvex_Icc
theorem strictConvex_Ioo (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ioo r s) :=
ordConnected_Ioo.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ioo strictConvex_Ioo
theorem strictConvex_Ico (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ico r s) :=
ordConnected_Ico.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ico strictConvex_Ico
theorem strictConvex_Ioc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (Ioc r s) :=
ordConnected_Ioc.strictConvex
#align strict_convex_Ioc strictConvex_Ioc
theorem strictConvex_uIcc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (uIcc r s) :=
strictConvex_Icc _ _
#align strict_convex_uIcc strictConvex_uIcc
theorem strictConvex_uIoc (r s : β) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (uIoc r s) :=
strictConvex_Ioc _ _
#align strict_convex_uIoc strictConvex_uIoc
end LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid
end Module
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCancelCommMonoid
variable [AddCancelCommMonoid E] [ContinuousAdd E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E}
/-- The translation of a strictly convex set is also strictly convex. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Strict.lean | 222 | 227 | theorem StrictConvex.preimage_add_right (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (z : E) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 ((fun x => z + x) ⁻¹' s) := by |
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
refine preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage (continuous_add_left _) ?_
have h := hs hx hy ((add_right_injective _).ne hxy) ha hb hab
rwa [smul_add, smul_add, add_add_add_comm, ← _root_.add_smul, hab, one_smul] at h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.PUnitInstances
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Congruence.Basic
/-!
# Coproduct (free product) of two monoids or groups
In this file we define `Monoid.Coprod M N` (notation: `M ∗ N`)
to be the coproduct (a.k.a. free product) of two monoids.
The same type is used for the coproduct of two monoids and for the coproduct of two groups.
The coproduct `M ∗ N` has the following universal property:
for any monoid `P` and homomorphisms `f : M →* P`, `g : N →* P`,
there exists a unique homomorphism `fg : M ∗ N →* P`
such that `fg ∘ Monoid.Coprod.inl = f` and `fg ∘ Monoid.Coprod.inr = g`,
where `Monoid.Coprod.inl : M →* M ∗ N`
and `Monoid.Coprod.inr : N →* M ∗ N` are canonical embeddings.
This homomorphism `fg` is given by `Monoid.Coprod.lift f g`.
We also define some homomorphisms and isomorphisms about `M ∗ N`,
and provide additive versions of all definitions and theorems.
## Main definitions
### Types
* `Monoid.Coprod M N` (a.k.a. `M ∗ N`):
the free product (a.k.a. coproduct) of two monoids `M` and `N`.
* `AddMonoid.Coprod M N` (no notation): the additive version of `Monoid.Coprod`.
In other sections, we only list multiplicative definitions.
### Instances
* `MulOneClass`, `Monoid`, and `Group` structures on the coproduct `M ∗ N`.
### Monoid homomorphisms
* `Monoid.Coprod.mk`: the projection `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.inl`, `Monoid.Coprod.inr`: canonical embeddings `M →* M ∗ N` and `N →* M ∗ N`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.lift`: construct a monoid homomorphism `M ∗ N →* P`
from homomorphisms `M →* P` and `N →* P`; see also `Monoid.Coprod.liftEquiv`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.clift`: a constructor for homomorphisms `M ∗ N →* P`
that allows the user to control the computational behavior.
* `Monoid.Coprod.map`: combine two homomorphisms `f : M →* N` and `g : M' →* N'`
into `M ∗ M' →* N ∗ N'`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.swap`: the natural homomorphism `M ∗ N →* N ∗ M`.
* `Monoid.Coprod.fst`, `Monoid.Coprod.snd`, and `Monoid.Coprod.toProd`:
natural projections `M ∗ N →* M`, `M ∗ N →* N`, and `M ∗ N →* M × N`.
### Monoid isomorphisms
* `MulEquiv.coprodCongr`: a `MulEquiv` version of `Monoid.Coprod.map`.
* `MulEquiv.coprodComm`: a `MulEquiv` version of `Monoid.Coprod.swap`.
* `MulEquiv.coprodAssoc`: associativity of the coproduct.
* `MulEquiv.coprodPUnit`, `MulEquiv.punitCoprod`:
free product by `PUnit` on the left or on the right is isomorphic to the original monoid.
## Main results
The universal property of the coproduct
is given by the definition `Monoid.Coprod.lift` and the lemma `Monoid.Coprod.lift_unique`.
We also prove a slightly more general extensionality lemma `Monoid.Coprod.hom_ext`
for homomorphisms `M ∗ N →* P` and prove lots of basic lemmas like `Monoid.Coprod.fst_comp_inl`.
## Implementation details
The definition of the coproduct of an indexed family of monoids is formalized in `Monoid.CoprodI`.
While mathematically `M ∗ N` is a particular case
of the coproduct of an indexed family of monoids,
it is easier to build API from scratch instead of using something like
```
def Monoid.Coprod M N := Monoid.CoprodI ![M, N]
```
or
```
def Monoid.Coprod M N := Monoid.CoprodI (fun b : Bool => cond b M N)
```
There are several reasons to build an API from scratch.
- API about `Con` makes it easy to define the required type and prove the universal property,
so there is little overhead compared to transferring API from `Monoid.CoprodI`.
- If `M` and `N` live in different universes, then the definition has to add `ULift`s;
this makes it harder to transfer API and definitions.
- As of now, we have no way
to automatically build an instance of `(k : Fin 2) → Monoid (![M, N] k)`
from `[Monoid M]` and `[Monoid N]`,
not even speaking about more advanced typeclass assumptions that involve both `M` and `N`.
- Using a list of `M ⊕ N` instead of, e.g., a list of `Σ k : Fin 2, ![M, N] k`
as the underlying type makes it possible to write computationally effective code
(though this point is not tested yet).
## TODO
- Prove `Monoid.CoprodI (f : Fin 2 → Type*) ≃* f 0 ∗ f 1` and
`Monoid.CoprodI (f : Bool → Type*) ≃* f false ∗ f true`.
## Tags
group, monoid, coproduct, free product
-/
open FreeMonoid Function List Set
namespace Monoid
/-- The minimal congruence relation `c` on `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)`
such that `FreeMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inl` and `FreeMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inr` are monoid homomorphisms
to the quotient by `c`. -/
@[to_additive "The minimal additive congruence relation `c` on `FreeAddMonoid (M ⊕ N)`
such that `FreeAddMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inl` and `FreeAddMonoid.of ∘ Sum.inr`
are additive monoid homomorphisms to the quotient by `c`."]
def coprodCon (M N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] : Con (FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)) :=
sInf {c |
(∀ x y : M, c (of (Sum.inl (x * y))) (of (Sum.inl x) * of (Sum.inl y)))
∧ (∀ x y : N, c (of (Sum.inr (x * y))) (of (Sum.inr x) * of (Sum.inr y)))
∧ c (of <| Sum.inl 1) 1 ∧ c (of <| Sum.inr 1) 1}
/-- Coproduct of two monoids or groups. -/
@[to_additive "Coproduct of two additive monoids or groups."]
def Coprod (M N : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] := (coprodCon M N).Quotient
namespace Coprod
@[inherit_doc]
scoped infix:30 " ∗ " => Coprod
section MulOneClass
variable {M N M' N' P : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [MulOneClass M'] [MulOneClass N']
[MulOneClass P]
@[to_additive] protected instance : MulOneClass (M ∗ N) := Con.mulOneClass _
/-- The natural projection `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `FreeAddMonoid (M ⊕ N) →+ AddMonoid.Coprod M N`."]
def mk : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N := Con.mk' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem con_ker_mk : Con.ker mk = coprodCon M N := Con.mk'_ker _
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_surjective : Surjective (@mk M N _ _) := surjective_quot_mk _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mrange_mk : MonoidHom.mrange (@mk M N _ _) = ⊤ := Con.mrange_mk'
@[to_additive]
theorem mk_eq_mk {w₁ w₂ : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)} : mk w₁ = mk w₂ ↔ coprodCon M N w₁ w₂ := Con.eq _
/-- The natural embedding `M →* M ∗ N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural embedding `M →+ AddMonoid.Coprod M N`."]
def inl : M →* M ∗ N where
toFun := fun x => mk (of (.inl x))
map_one' := mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.2.2.1
map_mul' := fun x y => mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.1 x y
/-- The natural embedding `N →* M ∗ N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural embedding `N →+ AddMonoid.Coprod M N`."]
def inr : N →* M ∗ N where
toFun := fun x => mk (of (.inr x))
map_one' := mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.2.2.2
map_mul' := fun x y => mk_eq_mk.2 fun _c hc => hc.2.1 x y
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_of_inl (x : M) : (mk (of (.inl x)) : M ∗ N) = inl x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_of_inr (x : N) : (mk (of (.inr x)) : M ∗ N) = inr x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on' {C : M ∗ N → Prop} (m : M ∗ N)
(one : C 1)
(inl_mul : ∀ m x, C x → C (inl m * x))
(inr_mul : ∀ n x, C x → C (inr n * x)) : C m := by
rcases mk_surjective m with ⟨x, rfl⟩
induction x using FreeMonoid.recOn with
| h0 => exact one
| ih x xs ih =>
cases x with
| inl m => simpa using inl_mul m _ ih
| inr n => simpa using inr_mul n _ ih
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)]
theorem induction_on {C : M ∗ N → Prop} (m : M ∗ N)
(inl : ∀ m, C (inl m)) (inr : ∀ n, C (inr n)) (mul : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x * y)) : C m :=
induction_on' m (by simpa using inl 1) (fun _ _ ↦ mul _ _ (inl _)) fun _ _ ↦ mul _ _ (inr _)
/-- Lift a monoid homomorphism `FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P` satisfying additional properties to
`M ∗ N →* P`. In many cases, `Coprod.lift` is more convenient.
Compared to `Coprod.lift`,
this definition allows a user to provide a custom computational behavior.
Also, it only needs `MulOneclass` assumptions while `Coprod.lift` needs a `Monoid` structure.
-/
@[to_additive "Lift an additive monoid homomorphism `FreeAddMonoid (M ⊕ N) →+ P` satisfying
additional properties to `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ P`.
Compared to `AddMonoid.Coprod.lift`,
this definition allows a user to provide a custom computational behavior.
Also, it only needs `AddZeroclass` assumptions
while `AddMonoid.Coprod.lift` needs an `AddMonoid` structure. "]
def clift (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P)
(hM₁ : f (of (.inl 1)) = 1) (hN₁ : f (of (.inr 1)) = 1)
(hM : ∀ x y, f (of (.inl (x * y))) = f (of (.inl x) * of (.inl y)))
(hN : ∀ x y, f (of (.inr (x * y))) = f (of (.inr x) * of (.inr y))) :
M ∗ N →* P :=
Con.lift _ f <| sInf_le ⟨hM, hN, hM₁.trans (map_one f).symm, hN₁.trans (map_one f).symm⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_apply_inl (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN) (x : M) :
clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN (inl x) = f (of (.inl x)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_apply_inr (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN) (x : N) :
clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN (inr x) = f (of (.inr x)) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_apply_mk (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN w) :
clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN (mk w) = f w :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_comp_mk (f : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* P) (hM₁ hN₁ hM hN) :
(clift f hM₁ hN₁ hM hN).comp mk = f :=
DFunLike.ext' rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mclosure_range_inl_union_inr :
Submonoid.closure (range (inl : M →* M ∗ N) ∪ range (inr : N →* M ∗ N)) = ⊤ := by
rw [← mrange_mk, MonoidHom.mrange_eq_map, ← closure_range_of, MonoidHom.map_mclosure,
← range_comp, Sum.range_eq]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mrange_inl_sup_mrange_inr :
MonoidHom.mrange (inl : M →* M ∗ N) ⊔ MonoidHom.mrange (inr : N →* M ∗ N) = ⊤ := by
rw [← mclosure_range_inl_union_inr, Submonoid.closure_union, ← MonoidHom.coe_mrange,
← MonoidHom.coe_mrange, Submonoid.closure_eq, Submonoid.closure_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem codisjoint_mrange_inl_mrange_inr :
Codisjoint (MonoidHom.mrange (inl : M →* M ∗ N)) (MonoidHom.mrange inr) :=
codisjoint_iff.2 mrange_inl_sup_mrange_inr
@[to_additive] theorem mrange_eq (f : M ∗ N →* P) :
MonoidHom.mrange f = MonoidHom.mrange (f.comp inl) ⊔ MonoidHom.mrange (f.comp inr) := by
rw [MonoidHom.mrange_eq_map, ← mrange_inl_sup_mrange_inr, Submonoid.map_sup, MonoidHom.map_mrange,
MonoidHom.map_mrange]
/-- Extensionality lemma for monoid homomorphisms `M ∗ N →* P`.
If two homomorphisms agree on the ranges of `Monoid.Coprod.inl` and `Monoid.Coprod.inr`,
then they are equal. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext 1100)
"Extensionality lemma for additive monoid homomorphisms `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ P`.
If two homomorphisms agree on the ranges of `AddMonoid.Coprod.inl` and `AddMonoid.Coprod.inr`,
then they are equal."]
theorem hom_ext {f g : M ∗ N →* P} (h₁ : f.comp inl = g.comp inl) (h₂ : f.comp inr = g.comp inr) :
f = g :=
MonoidHom.eq_of_eqOn_denseM mclosure_range_inl_union_inr <| eqOn_union.2
⟨eqOn_range.2 <| DFunLike.ext'_iff.1 h₁, eqOn_range.2 <| DFunLike.ext'_iff.1 h₂⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem clift_mk :
clift (mk : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N) →* M ∗ N) (map_one inl) (map_one inr) (map_mul inl)
(map_mul inr) = .id _ :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
/-- Map `M ∗ N` to `M' ∗ N'` by applying `Sum.map f g` to each element of the underlying list. -/
@[to_additive "Map `AddMonoid.Coprod M N` to `AddMonoid.Coprod M' N'`
by applying `Sum.map f g` to each element of the underlying list."]
def map (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : M ∗ N →* M' ∗ N' :=
clift (mk.comp <| FreeMonoid.map <| Sum.map f g)
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inl, map_one, mk_of_inl])
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inr, map_one, mk_of_inr])
(fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inl, map_mul, mk_of_inl])
fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.map_inr, map_mul, mk_of_inr]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_mk_ofList (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (l : List (M ⊕ N)) :
map f g (mk (ofList l)) = mk (ofList (l.map (Sum.map f g))) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_apply_inl (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : M) : map f g (inl x) = inl (f x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_apply_inr (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : N) : map f g (inr x) = inr (g x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp_inl (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : (map f g).comp inl = inl.comp f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp_inr (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : (map f g).comp inr = inr.comp g := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id_id : map (.id M) (.id N) = .id (M ∗ N) := hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_comp_map {M'' N''} [MulOneClass M''] [MulOneClass N''] (f' : M' →* M'') (g' : N' →* N'')
(f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') : (map f' g').comp (map f g) = map (f'.comp f) (g'.comp g) :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem map_map {M'' N''} [MulOneClass M''] [MulOneClass N''] (f' : M' →* M'') (g' : N' →* N'')
(f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : M ∗ N) :
map f' g' (map f g x) = map (f'.comp f) (g'.comp g) x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (map_comp_map f' g' f g) x
variable (M N)
/-- Map `M ∗ N` to `N ∗ M` by applying `Sum.swap` to each element of the underlying list.
See also `MulEquiv.coprodComm` for a `MulEquiv` version. -/
@[to_additive "Map `AddMonoid.Coprod M N` to `AddMonoid.Coprod N M`
by applying `Sum.swap` to each element of the underlying list.
See also `AddEquiv.coprodComm` for an `AddEquiv` version."]
def swap : M ∗ N →* N ∗ M :=
clift (mk.comp <| FreeMonoid.map Sum.swap)
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inl, mk_of_inr, map_one])
(by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inr, mk_of_inl, map_one])
(fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inl, mk_of_inr, map_mul])
(fun x y => by simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, map_of, Sum.swap_inr, mk_of_inl, map_mul])
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_comp_swap : (swap M N).comp (swap N M) = .id _ := hom_ext rfl rfl
variable {M N}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_swap (x : M ∗ N) : swap N M (swap M N x) = x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (swap_comp_swap _ _) x
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_comp_map (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') :
(swap M' N').comp (map f g) = (map g f).comp (swap M N) :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_map (f : M →* M') (g : N →* N') (x : M ∗ N) :
swap M' N' (map f g x) = map g f (swap M N x) :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (swap_comp_map f g) x
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_comp_inl : (swap M N).comp inl = inr := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_inl (x : M) : swap M N (inl x) = inr x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_comp_inr : (swap M N).comp inr = inl := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem swap_inr (x : N) : swap M N (inr x) = inl x := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_injective : Injective (swap M N) := LeftInverse.injective swap_swap
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_inj {x y : M ∗ N} : swap M N x = swap M N y ↔ x = y := swap_injective.eq_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem swap_eq_one {x : M ∗ N} : swap M N x = 1 ↔ x = 1 := swap_injective.eq_iff' (map_one _)
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_surjective : Surjective (swap M N) := LeftInverse.surjective swap_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem swap_bijective : Bijective (swap M N) := ⟨swap_injective, swap_surjective⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mker_swap : MonoidHom.mker (swap M N) = ⊥ := Submonoid.ext fun _ ↦ swap_eq_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mrange_swap : MonoidHom.mrange (swap M N) = ⊤ :=
MonoidHom.mrange_top_of_surjective _ swap_surjective
end MulOneClass
section Lift
variable {M N P : Type*} [MulOneClass M] [MulOneClass N] [Monoid P]
/-- Lift a pair of monoid homomorphisms `f : M →* P`, `g : N →* P`
to a monoid homomorphism `M ∗ N →* P`.
See also `Coprod.clift` for a version that allows custom computational behavior
and works for a `MulOneClass` codomain.
-/
@[to_additive "Lift a pair of additive monoid homomorphisms `f : M →+ P`, `g : N →+ P`
to an additive monoid homomorphism `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ P`.
See also `AddMonoid.Coprod.clift` for a version that allows custom computational behavior
and works for an `AddZeroClass` codomain."]
def lift (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (M ∗ N) →* P :=
clift (FreeMonoid.lift <| Sum.elim f g) (map_one f) (map_one g) (map_mul f) (map_mul g)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_apply_mk (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : FreeMonoid (M ⊕ N)) :
lift f g (mk x) = FreeMonoid.lift (Sum.elim f g) x :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_apply_inl (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : M) : lift f g (inl x) = f x :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem lift_unique {f : M →* P} {g : N →* P} {fg : M ∗ N →* P} (h₁ : fg.comp inl = f)
(h₂ : fg.comp inr = g) : fg = lift f g :=
hom_ext h₁ h₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_inl (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (lift f g).comp inl = f := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_apply_inr (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : N) : lift f g (inr x) = g x :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_inr (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (lift f g).comp inr = g := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_comp_swap (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) : (lift f g).comp (swap N M) = lift g f :=
hom_ext rfl rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_swap (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) (x : N ∗ M) : lift f g (swap N M x) = lift g f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift_comp_swap f g) x
@[to_additive]
theorem comp_lift {P' : Type*} [Monoid P'] (f : P →* P') (g₁ : M →* P) (g₂ : N →* P) :
f.comp (lift g₁ g₂) = lift (f.comp g₁) (f.comp g₂) :=
hom_ext (by rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, lift_comp_inl, lift_comp_inl]) <| by
rw [MonoidHom.comp_assoc, lift_comp_inr, lift_comp_inr]
/-- `Coprod.lift` as an equivalence. -/
@[to_additive "`AddMonoid.Coprod.lift` as an equivalence."]
def liftEquiv : (M →* P) × (N →* P) ≃ (M ∗ N →* P) where
toFun fg := lift fg.1 fg.2
invFun f := (f.comp inl, f.comp inr)
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := Eq.symm <| lift_unique rfl rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mrange_lift (f : M →* P) (g : N →* P) :
MonoidHom.mrange (lift f g) = MonoidHom.mrange f ⊔ MonoidHom.mrange g := by
simp [mrange_eq]
end Lift
section ToProd
variable {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [Monoid N]
@[to_additive] instance : Monoid (M ∗ N) :=
{ mul_assoc := (Con.monoid _).mul_assoc
one_mul := (Con.monoid _).one_mul
mul_one := (Con.monoid _).mul_one }
/-- The natural projection `M ∗ N →* M`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ M`."]
def fst : M ∗ N →* M := lift (.id M) 1
/-- The natural projection `M ∗ N →* N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ N`."]
def snd : M ∗ N →* N := lift 1 (.id N)
/-- The natural projection `M ∗ N →* M × N`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural projection `AddMonoid.Coprod M N →+ M × N`."]
def toProd : M ∗ N →* M × N := lift (.inl _ _) (.inr _ _)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_comp_inl : (fst : M ∗ N →* M).comp inl = .id _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_apply_inl (x : M) : fst (inl x : M ∗ N) = x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_comp_inr : (fst : M ∗ N →* M).comp inr = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem fst_apply_inr (x : N) : fst (inr x : M ∗ N) = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_comp_inl : (snd : M ∗ N →* N).comp inl = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_apply_inl (x : M) : snd (inl x : M ∗ N) = 1 := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_comp_inr : (snd : M ∗ N →* N).comp inr = .id _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem snd_apply_inr (x : N) : snd (inr x : M ∗ N) = x := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_comp_inl : (toProd : M ∗ N →* M × N).comp inl = .inl _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_comp_inr : (toProd : M ∗ N →* M × N).comp inr = .inr _ _ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_apply_inl (x : M) : toProd (inl x : M ∗ N) = (x, 1) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toProd_apply_inr (x : N) : toProd (inr x : M ∗ N) = (1, x) := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fst_prod_snd : (fst : M ∗ N →* M).prod snd = toProd := by ext1 <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk_fst_snd (x : M ∗ N) : (fst x, snd x) = toProd x := by
rw [← fst_prod_snd, MonoidHom.prod_apply]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fst_comp_toProd : (MonoidHom.fst M N).comp toProd = fst := by
rw [← fst_prod_snd, MonoidHom.fst_comp_prod]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem fst_toProd (x : M ∗ N) : (toProd x).1 = fst x := by
rw [← fst_comp_toProd]; rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coprod/Basic.lean | 520 | 521 | theorem snd_comp_toProd : (MonoidHom.snd M N).comp toProd = snd := by |
rw [← fst_prod_snd, MonoidHom.snd_comp_prod]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.special_functions.log.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f23a09ce6d3f367220dc3cecad6b7eb69eb01690"
/-!
# Real logarithm
In this file we define `Real.log` to be the logarithm of a real number. As usual, we extend it from
its domain `(0, +∞)` to a globally defined function. We choose to do it so that `log 0 = 0` and
`log (-x) = log x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and show that it is continuous.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm function, equal to the inverse of the exponential for `x > 0`,
to `log |x|` for `x < 0`, and to `0` for `0`. We use this unconventional extension to
`(-∞, 0]` as it gives the formula `log (x * y) = log x + log y` for all nonzero `x` and `y`, and
the derivative of `log` is `1/x` away from `0`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: removed
noncomputable def log (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
if hx : x = 0 then 0 else expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩
#align real.log Real.log
theorem log_of_ne_zero (hx : x ≠ 0) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨|x|, abs_pos.2 hx⟩ :=
dif_neg hx
#align real.log_of_ne_zero Real.log_of_ne_zero
theorem log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : log x = expOrderIso.symm ⟨x, hx⟩ := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx.ne']
congr
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.log_of_pos Real.log_of_pos
theorem exp_log_eq_abs (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = |x| := by
rw [log_of_ne_zero hx, ← coe_expOrderIso_apply, OrderIso.apply_symm_apply, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align real.exp_log_eq_abs Real.exp_log_eq_abs
theorem exp_log (hx : 0 < x) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs hx.ne']
exact abs_of_pos hx
#align real.exp_log Real.exp_log
theorem exp_log_of_neg (hx : x < 0) : exp (log x) = -x := by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (ne_of_lt hx)]
exact abs_of_neg hx
#align real.exp_log_of_neg Real.exp_log_of_neg
theorem le_exp_log (x : ℝ) : x ≤ exp (log x) := by
by_cases h_zero : x = 0
· rw [h_zero, log, dif_pos rfl, exp_zero]
exact zero_le_one
· rw [exp_log_eq_abs h_zero]
exact le_abs_self _
#align real.le_exp_log Real.le_exp_log
@[simp]
theorem log_exp (x : ℝ) : log (exp x) = x :=
exp_injective <| exp_log (exp_pos x)
#align real.log_exp Real.log_exp
theorem surjOn_log : SurjOn log (Ioi 0) univ := fun x _ => ⟨exp x, exp_pos x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.surj_on_log Real.surjOn_log
theorem log_surjective : Surjective log := fun x => ⟨exp x, log_exp x⟩
#align real.log_surjective Real.log_surjective
@[simp]
theorem range_log : range log = univ :=
log_surjective.range_eq
#align real.range_log Real.range_log
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align real.log_zero Real.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 :=
exp_injective <| by rw [exp_log zero_lt_one, exp_zero]
#align real.log_one Real.log_one
@[simp]
theorem log_abs (x : ℝ) : log |x| = log x := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp [h]
· rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs h, exp_log_eq_abs (abs_pos.2 h).ne', abs_abs]
#align real.log_abs Real.log_abs
@[simp]
theorem log_neg_eq_log (x : ℝ) : log (-x) = log x := by rw [← log_abs x, ← log_abs (-x), abs_neg]
#align real.log_neg_eq_log Real.log_neg_eq_log
theorem sinh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : sinh (log x) = (x - x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [sinh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.sinh_log Real.sinh_log
theorem cosh_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) : cosh (log x) = (x + x⁻¹) / 2 := by
rw [cosh_eq, exp_neg, exp_log hx]
#align real.cosh_log Real.cosh_log
theorem surjOn_log' : SurjOn log (Iio 0) univ := fun x _ =>
⟨-exp x, neg_lt_zero.2 <| exp_pos x, by rw [log_neg_eq_log, log_exp]⟩
#align real.surj_on_log' Real.surjOn_log'
theorem log_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x * y) = log x + log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (mul_ne_zero hx hy), exp_add, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_mul]
#align real.log_mul Real.log_mul
theorem log_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : log (x / y) = log x - log y :=
exp_injective <| by
rw [exp_log_eq_abs (div_ne_zero hx hy), exp_sub, exp_log_eq_abs hx, exp_log_eq_abs hy, abs_div]
#align real.log_div Real.log_div
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (x : ℝ) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [← exp_eq_exp, exp_log_eq_abs (inv_ne_zero hx), exp_neg, exp_log_eq_abs hx, abs_inv]
#align real.log_inv Real.log_inv
theorem log_le_log_iff (h : 0 < x) (h₁ : 0 < y) : log x ≤ log y ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log h, exp_log h₁]
#align real.log_le_log Real.log_le_log_iff
@[gcongr]
lemma log_le_log (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) : log x ≤ log y :=
(log_le_log_iff hx (hx.trans_le hxy)).2 hxy
@[gcongr]
theorem log_lt_log (hx : 0 < x) (h : x < y) : log x < log y := by
rwa [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log (lt_trans hx h)]
#align real.log_lt_log Real.log_lt_log
theorem log_lt_log_iff (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) : log x < log y ↔ x < y := by
rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx, exp_log hy]
#align real.log_lt_log_iff Real.log_lt_log_iff
theorem log_le_iff_le_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x ≤ y ↔ x ≤ exp y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_le_iff_le_exp Real.log_le_iff_le_exp
theorem log_lt_iff_lt_exp (hx : 0 < x) : log x < y ↔ x < exp y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hx]
#align real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp Real.log_lt_iff_lt_exp
theorem le_log_iff_exp_le (hy : 0 < y) : x ≤ log y ↔ exp x ≤ y := by rw [← exp_le_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.le_log_iff_exp_le Real.le_log_iff_exp_le
theorem lt_log_iff_exp_lt (hy : 0 < y) : x < log y ↔ exp x < y := by rw [← exp_lt_exp, exp_log hy]
#align real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt Real.lt_log_iff_exp_lt
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Basic.lean | 171 | 173 | theorem log_pos_iff (hx : 0 < x) : 0 < log x ↔ 1 < x := by |
rw [← log_one]
exact log_lt_log_iff zero_lt_one hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## TODO
This file is huge; move material into separate files,
such as `Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Lemmas.lean`.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are nonnegative, via
`norm_nonneg'`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are nonnegative, via `norm_nonneg`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
#align norm_div_le norm_div_le
#align norm_sub_le norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
#align norm_div_le_of_le norm_div_le_of_le
#align norm_sub_le_of_le norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm' dist_le_norm_add_norm'
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm dist_le_norm_add_norm
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le' abs_norm_sub_norm_le'
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le abs_norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
#align norm_sub_norm_le' norm_sub_norm_le'
#align norm_sub_norm_le norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
#align dist_norm_norm_le' dist_norm_norm_le'
#align dist_norm_norm_le dist_norm_norm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' norm_le_norm_add_norm_div'
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div norm_le_norm_add_norm_div
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
#align norm_le_insert' norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
#align norm_le_insert norm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
#align norm_le_mul_norm_add norm_le_mul_norm_add
#align norm_le_add_norm_add norm_le_add_norm_add
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align ball_eq' ball_eq'
#align ball_eq ball_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
#align ball_one_eq ball_one_eq
#align ball_zero_eq ball_zero_eq
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm'' mem_ball_iff_norm''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm mem_ball_iff_norm
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm''' mem_ball_iff_norm'''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm' mem_ball_iff_norm'
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
#align mem_ball_one_iff mem_ball_one_iff
#align mem_ball_zero_iff mem_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'' mem_closedBall_iff_norm''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm mem_closedBall_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
#align mem_closed_ball_one_iff mem_closedBall_one_iff
#align mem_closed_ball_zero_iff mem_closedBall_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm''' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball' norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball norm_le_of_mem_closedBall
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball' norm_lt_of_mem_ball'
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball norm_lt_of_mem_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right'] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
#align norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div
#align norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub
@[to_additive isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le]
theorem isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le' : Bornology.IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [Set.subset_def, mem_closedBall_one_iff] using isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (1 : E)
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le', _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le, _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le
attribute [to_additive existing exists_norm_le] Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive exists_pos_norm_le]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R :=
let ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le'
⟨max R₀ 1, by positivity, fun x hx => (hR₀ x hx).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le
@[to_additive Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ < R :=
let ⟨R, hR₀, hR⟩ := hs.exists_pos_norm_le'
⟨R + 1, by positivity, fun x hx ↦ (hR x hx).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm' mem_sphere_iff_norm'
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm mem_sphere_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_one_iff_norm mem_sphere_one_iff_norm
#align mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' norm_eq_of_mem_sphere'
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere norm_eq_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
#align ne_one_of_mem_sphere ne_one_of_mem_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
#align ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
#align norm_group_seminorm normGroupSeminorm
#align norm_add_group_seminorm normAddGroupSeminorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_norm_group_seminorm coe_normGroupSeminorm
#align coe_norm_add_group_seminorm coe_normAddGroupSeminorm
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_zero NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {u : α → E} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → ‖u m / u n‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.cauchySeq_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
#align normed_add_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedAddCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
#align normed_add_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedAddCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
#align monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
#align monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
@[to_additive IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn]
theorem IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn' [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
{f : α → E} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
(isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.1 (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isBounded).imp fun _C hC _x hx =>
hC _ <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on' IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn'
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.exists_bound_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace α]
{f : α → E} (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) (h'f : Continuous f) : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa using (hf.isCompact_range h'f).isBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
#align seminormed_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm
#align seminormed_add_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ :=
rfl
#align coe_nnnorm' coe_nnnorm'
#align coe_nnnorm coe_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_comp_nnnorm' coe_comp_nnnorm'
#align coe_comp_nnnorm coe_comp_nnnorm
@[to_additive norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
#align norm_to_nnreal' norm_toNNReal'
#align norm_to_nnreal norm_toNNReal
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_div nndist_eq_nnnorm_div
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm nndist_eq_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 :=
NNReal.eq norm_one'
#align nnnorm_one' nnnorm_one'
#align nnnorm_zero nnnorm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
#align ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
#align nnnorm_mul_le' nnnorm_mul_le'
#align nnnorm_add_le nnnorm_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
#align nnnorm_inv' nnnorm_inv'
#align nnnorm_neg nnnorm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
#align nnnorm_div_le nnnorm_div_le
#align nnnorm_sub_le nnnorm_sub_le
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le'
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div'
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
#align nnnorm_le_insert' nnnorm_le_insert'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
#align nnnorm_le_insert nnnorm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
#align nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add
#align nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : ENNReal.ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖₊ :=
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' (x : E) : edist x 1 = (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div, div_one]
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' edist_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm edist_eq_coe_nnnorm
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_emetric_ball_one_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : a ∈ EMetric.ball (1 : E) r ↔ ↑‖a‖₊ < r := by
rw [EMetric.mem_ball, edist_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align mem_emetric_ball_one_iff mem_emetric_ball_one_iff
#align mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff mem_emetric_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ≥0)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C * ‖x‖₊) : LipschitzWith C f :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe C ▸ MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖) : AntilipschitzWith K f :=
AntilipschitzWith.of_le_mul_dist fun x y => by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.antilipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖ ≤ K * ‖x‖ := by simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.dist_le_mul x 1
#align lipschitz_with.norm_le_mul' LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul'
#align lipschitz_with.norm_le_mul LipschitzWith.norm_le_mul
@[to_additive LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul]
theorem LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hf : f 1 = 1)
(x) : ‖f x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖x‖₊ :=
h.norm_le_mul' hf x
#align lipschitz_with.nnorm_le_mul' LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul'
#align lipschitz_with.nnorm_le_mul LipschitzWith.nnorm_le_mul
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := by
simpa only [dist_one_right, hf] using h.le_mul_dist x 1
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_norm' AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm'
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_norm AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm
@[to_additive AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm]
theorem AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm' {f : E → F} {K : ℝ≥0} (h : AntilipschitzWith K f)
(hf : f 1 = 1) (x) : ‖x‖₊ ≤ K * ‖f x‖₊ :=
h.le_mul_norm' hf x
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nnnorm' AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm'
#align antilipschitz_with.le_mul_nnnorm AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz [OneHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) {K : ℝ≥0}
(h : AntilipschitzWith K f) (x) : ‖x‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ :=
h.le_mul_nnnorm' (map_one f) x
#align one_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz OneHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz
#align zero_hom_class.bound_of_antilipschitz ZeroHomClass.bound_of_antilipschitz
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.nnnorm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| hi.norm_map_of_map_one h₁ x
end NNNorm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero {f : α → E} {a : Filter α} {b : E} :
Tendsto f a (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto (fun e => ‖f e / b‖) a (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [← dist_eq_norm_div, ← tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero]
#align tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_one tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero
#align tendsto_iff_norm_tendsto_zero tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero {f : α → E} {a : Filter α} :
Tendsto f a (𝓝 1) ↔ Tendsto (‖f ·‖) a (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_iff_norm_div_tendsto_zero.trans <| by simp only [div_one]
#align tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_one tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
#align tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem comap_norm_nhds_one : comap norm (𝓝 0) = 𝓝 (1 : E) := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using nhds_comap_dist (1 : E)
#align comap_norm_nhds_one comap_norm_nhds_one
#align comap_norm_nhds_zero comap_norm_nhds_zero
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1` (neutral element of `SeminormedGroup`).
In this pair of lemmas (`squeeze_one_norm'` and `squeeze_one_norm`), following a convention of
similar lemmas in `Topology.MetricSpace.Basic` and `Topology.Algebra.Order`, the `'` version is
phrased using "eventually" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is eventually bounded by a
real function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`. In this pair of lemmas
(`squeeze_zero_norm'` and `squeeze_zero_norm`), following a convention of similar lemmas in
`Topology.MetricSpace.PseudoMetric` and `Topology.Algebra.Order`, the `'` version is phrased using
\"eventually\" and the non-`'` version is phrased absolutely."]
theorem squeeze_one_norm' {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ n in t₀, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n)
(h' : Tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0)) : Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
tendsto_one_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero' (eventually_of_forall fun _n => norm_nonneg' _) h h'
#align squeeze_one_norm' squeeze_one_norm'
#align squeeze_zero_norm' squeeze_zero_norm'
/-- Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real function `a` which
tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `1`. -/
@[to_additive "Special case of the sandwich theorem: if the norm of `f` is bounded by a real
function `a` which tends to `0`, then `f` tends to `0`."]
theorem squeeze_one_norm {f : α → E} {a : α → ℝ} {t₀ : Filter α} (h : ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ a n) :
Tendsto a t₀ (𝓝 0) → Tendsto f t₀ (𝓝 1) :=
squeeze_one_norm' <| eventually_of_forall h
#align squeeze_one_norm squeeze_one_norm
#align squeeze_zero_norm squeeze_zero_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_norm_div_self (x : E) : Tendsto (fun a => ‖a / x‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using
tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _a => (x : E)) (𝓝 x) _)
#align tendsto_norm_div_self tendsto_norm_div_self
#align tendsto_norm_sub_self tendsto_norm_sub_self
@[to_additive tendsto_norm]
theorem tendsto_norm' {x : E} : Tendsto (fun a => ‖a‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 ‖x‖) := by
simpa using tendsto_id.dist (tendsto_const_nhds : Tendsto (fun _a => (1 : E)) _ _)
#align tendsto_norm' tendsto_norm'
#align tendsto_norm tendsto_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem tendsto_norm_one : Tendsto (fun a : E => ‖a‖) (𝓝 1) (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_norm_div_self (1 : E)
#align tendsto_norm_one tendsto_norm_one
#align tendsto_norm_zero tendsto_norm_zero
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_norm]
theorem continuous_norm' : Continuous fun a : E => ‖a‖ := by
simpa using continuous_id.dist (continuous_const : Continuous fun _a => (1 : E))
#align continuous_norm' continuous_norm'
#align continuous_norm continuous_norm
@[to_additive (attr := continuity) continuous_nnnorm]
theorem continuous_nnnorm' : Continuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
continuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
#align continuous_nnnorm' continuous_nnnorm'
#align continuous_nnnorm continuous_nnnorm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_norm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_norm' : LipschitzWith 1 (norm : E → ℝ) := by
simpa only [dist_one_left] using LipschitzWith.dist_right (1 : E)
#align lipschitz_with_one_norm' lipschitzWith_one_norm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_norm lipschitzWith_one_norm
@[to_additive lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm]
theorem lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm' : LipschitzWith 1 (NNNorm.nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm' lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm'
#align lipschitz_with_one_nnnorm lipschitzWith_one_nnnorm
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_norm]
theorem uniformContinuous_norm' : UniformContinuous (norm : E → ℝ) :=
lipschitzWith_one_norm'.uniformContinuous
#align uniform_continuous_norm' uniformContinuous_norm'
#align uniform_continuous_norm uniformContinuous_norm
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_nnnorm]
theorem uniformContinuous_nnnorm' : UniformContinuous fun a : E => ‖a‖₊ :=
uniformContinuous_norm'.subtype_mk _
#align uniform_continuous_nnnorm' uniformContinuous_nnnorm'
#align uniform_continuous_nnnorm uniformContinuous_nnnorm
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure_one_iff_norm {x : E} : x ∈ closure ({1} : Set E) ↔ ‖x‖ = 0 := by
rw [← closedBall_zero', mem_closedBall_one_iff, (norm_nonneg' x).le_iff_eq]
#align mem_closure_one_iff_norm mem_closure_one_iff_norm
#align mem_closure_zero_iff_norm mem_closure_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_one_eq : closure ({1} : Set E) = { x | ‖x‖ = 0 } :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_closure_one_iff_norm
#align closure_one_eq closure_one_eq
#align closure_zero_eq closure_zero_eq
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead of
multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` for some constant A instead
of multiplication so that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le' {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∃ A, ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ A * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : Tendsto (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) := by
cases' h_op with A h_op
rcases hg with ⟨C, hC⟩; rw [eventually_map] at hC
rw [NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one] at hf ⊢
intro ε ε₀
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt ε₀ (A * C) with ⟨δ, δ₀, hδ⟩
filter_upwards [hf δ δ₀, hC] with i hf hg
refine (h_op _ _).trans_lt ?_
rcases le_total A 0 with hA | hA
· exact (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hA <| norm_nonneg' _) <|
norm_nonneg' _).trans_lt ε₀
calc
A * ‖f i‖ * ‖g i‖ ≤ A * δ * C := by gcongr; exact hg
_ = A * C * δ := mul_right_comm _ _ _
_ < ε := hδ
#align filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le' Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le'
#align filter.tendsto.op_zero_is_bounded_under_le' Filter.Tendsto.op_zero_isBoundedUnder_le'
/-- A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that tends to one
and a bounded function tends to one. This lemma is formulated for any binary operation
`op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so that it
can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`. -/
@[to_additive "A helper lemma used to prove that the (scalar or usual) product of a function that
tends to zero and a bounded function tends to zero. This lemma is formulated for any binary
operation `op : E → F → G` with an estimate `‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖` instead of multiplication so
that it can be applied to `(*)`, `flip (*)`, `(•)`, and `flip (•)`."]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {l : Filter α}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 1)) (hg : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ g)) (op : E → F → G)
(h_op : ∀ x y, ‖op x y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖) : Tendsto (fun x => op (f x) (g x)) l (𝓝 1) :=
hf.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le' hg op ⟨1, fun x y => (one_mul ‖x‖).symm ▸ h_op x y⟩
#align filter.tendsto.op_one_is_bounded_under_le Filter.Tendsto.op_one_isBoundedUnder_le
#align filter.tendsto.op_zero_is_bounded_under_le Filter.Tendsto.op_zero_isBoundedUnder_le
section
variable {l : Filter α} {f : α → E}
@[to_additive Filter.Tendsto.norm]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.norm' (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l (𝓝 ‖a‖) :=
tendsto_norm'.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.norm' Filter.Tendsto.norm'
#align filter.tendsto.norm Filter.Tendsto.norm
@[to_additive Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm]
theorem Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm' (h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) l (𝓝 ‖a‖₊) :=
Tendsto.comp continuous_nnnorm'.continuousAt h
#align filter.tendsto.nnnorm' Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm'
#align filter.tendsto.nnnorm Filter.Tendsto.nnnorm
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → E}
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) Continuous.norm]
theorem Continuous.norm' : Continuous f → Continuous fun x => ‖f x‖ :=
continuous_norm'.comp
#align continuous.norm' Continuous.norm'
#align continuous.norm Continuous.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) Continuous.nnnorm]
theorem Continuous.nnnorm' : Continuous f → Continuous fun x => ‖f x‖₊ :=
continuous_nnnorm'.comp
#align continuous.nnnorm' Continuous.nnnorm'
#align continuous.nnnorm Continuous.nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousAt.norm]
theorem ContinuousAt.norm' {a : α} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) a :=
Tendsto.norm' h
#align continuous_at.norm' ContinuousAt.norm'
#align continuous_at.norm ContinuousAt.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousAt.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousAt.nnnorm' {a : α} (h : ContinuousAt f a) : ContinuousAt (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) a :=
Tendsto.nnnorm' h
#align continuous_at.nnnorm' ContinuousAt.nnnorm'
#align continuous_at.nnnorm ContinuousAt.nnnorm
@[to_additive ContinuousWithinAt.norm]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.norm' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) s a :=
Tendsto.norm' h
#align continuous_within_at.norm' ContinuousWithinAt.norm'
#align continuous_within_at.norm ContinuousWithinAt.norm
@[to_additive ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : ContinuousWithinAt f s a) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) s a :=
Tendsto.nnnorm' h
#align continuous_within_at.nnnorm' ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm'
#align continuous_within_at.nnnorm ContinuousWithinAt.nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousOn.norm]
theorem ContinuousOn.norm' {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s :=
fun x hx => (h x hx).norm'
#align continuous_on.norm' ContinuousOn.norm'
#align continuous_on.norm ContinuousOn.norm
@[to_additive (attr := fun_prop) ContinuousOn.nnnorm]
theorem ContinuousOn.nnnorm' {s : Set α} (h : ContinuousOn f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ‖f x‖₊) s := fun x hx => (h x hx).nnnorm'
#align continuous_on.nnnorm' ContinuousOn.nnnorm'
#align continuous_on.nnnorm ContinuousOn.nnnorm
end
/-- If `‖y‖ → ∞`, then we can assume `y ≠ x` for any fixed `x`. -/
@[to_additive eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop "If `‖y‖→∞`, then we can assume `y≠x` for any
fixed `x`"]
theorem eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop' {l : Filter α} {f : α → E}
(h : Tendsto (fun y => ‖f y‖) l atTop) (x : E) : ∀ᶠ y in l, f y ≠ x :=
(h.eventually_ne_atTop _).mono fun _x => ne_of_apply_ne norm
#align eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top' eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop'
#align eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_at_top eventually_ne_of_tendsto_norm_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedCommGroup.mem_closure_iff :
a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ b ∈ s, ‖a / b‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.mem_closure_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align seminormed_comm_group.mem_closure_iff SeminormedCommGroup.mem_closure_iff
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.mem_closure_iff SeminormedAddCommGroup.mem_closure_iff
@[to_additive norm_le_zero_iff']
theorem norm_le_zero_iff''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ ≤ 0 ↔ a = 1 := by
letI : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedGroup E› with toMetricSpace := MetricSpace.ofT0PseudoMetricSpace E }
rw [← dist_one_right, dist_le_zero]
#align norm_le_zero_iff''' norm_le_zero_iff'''
#align norm_le_zero_iff' norm_le_zero_iff'
@[to_additive norm_eq_zero']
theorem norm_eq_zero''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : ‖a‖ = 0 ↔ a = 1 :=
(norm_nonneg' a).le_iff_eq.symm.trans norm_le_zero_iff'''
#align norm_eq_zero''' norm_eq_zero'''
#align norm_eq_zero' norm_eq_zero'
@[to_additive norm_pos_iff']
theorem norm_pos_iff''' [T0Space E] {a : E} : 0 < ‖a‖ ↔ a ≠ 1 := by
rw [← not_le, norm_le_zero_iff''']
#align norm_pos_iff''' norm_pos_iff'''
#align norm_pos_iff' norm_pos_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedGroup.tendstoUniformlyOn_one {f : ι → κ → G} {s : Set κ} {l : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformlyOn f 1 l s ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f i x‖ < ε := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-11.
Originally this was `simp_rw` instead of `simp only`,
but this creates a bad proof term with nested `OfNat.ofNat` that trips up `@[to_additive]`. -/
simp only [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff, Pi.one_apply, dist_one_left]
#align seminormed_group.tendsto_uniformly_on_one SeminormedGroup.tendstoUniformlyOn_one
#align seminormed_add_group.tendsto_uniformly_on_zero SeminormedAddGroup.tendstoUniformlyOn_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_one {f : ι → κ → G}
{l : Filter ι} {l' : Filter κ} :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter f l l' ↔
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι × ι => fun z => f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ˢ l) l' := by
refine ⟨fun hf u hu => ?_, fun hf u hu => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu
refine
(hf { p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε } <| dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono fun x hx =>
H 1 (f x.fst.fst x.snd / f x.fst.snd x.snd) ?_
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx
· obtain ⟨ε, hε, H⟩ := uniformity_basis_dist.mem_uniformity_iff.mp hu
refine
(hf { p : G × G | dist p.fst p.snd < ε } <| dist_mem_uniformity hε).mono fun x hx =>
H (f x.fst.fst x.snd) (f x.fst.snd x.snd) ?_
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div, norm_div_rev] using hx
#align seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_one SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_one
#align seminormed_add_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_filter_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_zero SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_one {f : ι → κ → G} {s : Set κ}
{l : Filter ι} :
UniformCauchySeqOn f l s ↔
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι × ι => fun z => f n.fst z / f n.snd z) 1 (l ×ˢ l) s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter,
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter,
SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_one]
#align seminormed_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_one SeminormedGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_one
#align seminormed_add_group.uniform_cauchy_seq_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_zero SeminormedAddGroup.uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn_zero
end SeminormedGroup
section Induced
variable (E F)
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a `SeminormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "A group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
def SeminormedGroup.induced [Group E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ PseudoMetricSpace.induced f toPseudoMetricSpace with
-- Porting note: needed to add the instance explicitly, and `‹PseudoMetricSpace F›` failed
norm := fun x => ‖f x‖
dist_eq := fun x y => by simp only [map_div, ← dist_eq_norm_div]; rfl }
#align seminormed_group.induced SeminormedGroup.induced
#align seminormed_add_group.induced SeminormedAddGroup.induced
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `SeminormedGroup` induces a
`SeminormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "A group homomorphism from an `AddCommGroup` to a
`SeminormedAddGroup` induces a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.induced
[CommGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.induced SeminormedCommGroup.induced
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.induced SeminormedAddCommGroup.induced
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `Group` to a `NormedGroup` induces a `NormedGroup`
structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "An injective group homomorphism from an `AddGroup` to a
`NormedAddGroup` induces a `NormedAddGroup` structure on the domain."]
def NormedGroup.induced
[Group E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (h : Injective f) :
NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with }
#align normed_group.induced NormedGroup.induced
#align normed_add_group.induced NormedAddGroup.induced
-- See note [reducible non-instances].
/-- An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a `NormedGroup` induces a
`NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "An injective group homomorphism from a `CommGroup` to a
`NormedCommGroup` induces a `NormedCommGroup` structure on the domain."]
def NormedCommGroup.induced [CommGroup E] [NormedGroup F] [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕)
(h : Injective f) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.induced E F f, MetricSpace.induced f h _ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.induced NormedCommGroup.induced
#align normed_add_comm_group.induced NormedAddCommGroup.induced
end Induced
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] [SeminormedCommGroup F] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_left : IsometricSMul E E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_left NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_left
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_left NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_left
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_inv (x y : E) : dist x⁻¹ y = dist x y⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm_div, ← norm_inv' (x⁻¹ / y), inv_div, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align dist_inv dist_inv
#align dist_neg dist_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_right (a b : E) : dist a (a * b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_left a 1 b, mul_one]
#align dist_self_mul_right dist_self_mul_right
#align dist_self_add_right dist_self_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_self_mul_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_mul_right]
#align dist_self_mul_left dist_self_mul_left
#align dist_self_add_left dist_self_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- porting note (#10618): increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_right (a b : E) : dist a (a / b) = ‖b‖ := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_self_mul_right, norm_inv']
#align dist_self_div_right dist_self_div_right
#align dist_self_sub_right dist_self_sub_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001)]
-- porting note (#10618): increase priority because `simp` can prove this
theorem dist_self_div_left (a b : E) : dist (a / b) a = ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_self_div_right]
#align dist_self_div_left dist_self_div_left
#align dist_self_sub_left dist_self_sub_left
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right] using dist_triangle (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂)
#align dist_mul_mul_le dist_mul_mul_le
#align dist_add_add_le dist_add_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mul_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align dist_mul_mul_le_of_le dist_mul_mul_le_of_le
#align dist_add_add_le_of_le dist_add_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_div_div_le (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) : dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ dist a₁ b₁ + dist a₂ b₂ := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, dist_inv_inv] using dist_mul_mul_le a₁ a₂⁻¹ b₁ b₂⁻¹
#align dist_div_div_le dist_div_div_le
#align dist_sub_sub_le dist_sub_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_div_div_le_of_le (h₁ : dist a₁ b₁ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : dist a₂ b₂ ≤ r₂) :
dist (a₁ / a₂) (b₁ / b₂) ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(dist_div_div_le a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align dist_div_div_le_of_le dist_div_div_le_of_le
#align dist_sub_sub_le_of_le dist_sub_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,595 | 1,598 | theorem abs_dist_sub_le_dist_mul_mul (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : E) :
|dist a₁ b₁ - dist a₂ b₂| ≤ dist (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) := by |
simpa only [dist_mul_left, dist_mul_right, dist_comm b₂] using
abs_dist_sub_le (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) (b₁ * a₂)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
#align_import data.nat.multiplicity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ceb887ddf3344dab425292e497fa2af91498437c"
/-!
# Natural number multiplicity
This file contains lemmas about the multiplicity function (the maximum prime power dividing a
number) when applied to naturals, in particular calculating it for factorials and binomial
coefficients.
## Multiplicity calculations
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial`: Legendre's Theorem. The multiplicity of `p` in `n!` is
`n / p + ... + n / p ^ b` for any `b` such that `n / p ^ (b + 1) = 0`. See `padicValNat_factorial`
for this result stated in the language of `p`-adic valuations and
`sub_one_mul_padicValNat_factorial` for a related result.
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial_mul`: The multiplicity of `p` in `(p * n)!` is `n` more than
that of `n!`.
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_choose`: Kummer's Theorem. The multiplicity of `p` in `n.choose k` is the
number of carries when `k` and `n - k` are added in base `p`. See `padicValNat_choose` for the
same result but stated in the language of `p`-adic valuations and
`sub_one_mul_padicValNat_choose_eq_sub_sum_digits` for a related result.
## Other declarations
* `Nat.multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd`: The multiplicity of `m` in `n` is the number of positive
natural numbers `i` such that `m ^ i` divides `n`.
* `Nat.multiplicity_two_factorial_lt`: The multiplicity of `2` in `n!` is strictly less than `n`.
* `Nat.Prime.multiplicity_something`: Specialization of `multiplicity.something` to a prime in the
naturals. Avoids having to provide `p ≠ 1` and other trivialities, along with translating between
`Prime` and `Nat.Prime`.
## Tags
Legendre, p-adic
-/
open Finset Nat multiplicity
open Nat
namespace Nat
/-- The multiplicity of `m` in `n` is the number of positive natural numbers `i` such that `m ^ i`
divides `n`. This set is expressed by filtering `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than
`log m n`. -/
theorem multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd {m n b : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 1) (hn : 0 < n) (hb : log m n < b) :
multiplicity m n = ↑((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => m ^ i ∣ n).card :=
calc
multiplicity m n = ↑(Ico 1 <| (multiplicity m n).get (finite_nat_iff.2 ⟨hm, hn⟩) + 1).card := by
simp
_ = ↑((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => m ^ i ∣ n).card :=
congr_arg _ <|
congr_arg card <|
Finset.ext fun i => by
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← @PartENat.coe_le_coe i,
PartENat.natCast_get, ← pow_dvd_iff_le_multiplicity, and_right_comm]
refine (and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hb).symm
cases' m with m
· rw [zero_pow, zero_dvd_iff] at h
exacts [(hn.ne' h.2).elim, one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 h.1]
exact le_log_of_pow_le (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.2 ⟨m.succ_ne_zero, hm⟩)
(le_of_dvd hn h.2)
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd Nat.multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd
namespace Prime
theorem multiplicity_one {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : multiplicity p 1 = 0 :=
multiplicity.one_right hp.prime.not_unit
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_one Nat.Prime.multiplicity_one
theorem multiplicity_mul {p m n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
multiplicity p (m * n) = multiplicity p m + multiplicity p n :=
multiplicity.mul hp.prime
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_mul Nat.Prime.multiplicity_mul
theorem multiplicity_pow {p m n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
multiplicity p (m ^ n) = n • multiplicity p m :=
multiplicity.pow hp.prime
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_pow Nat.Prime.multiplicity_pow
theorem multiplicity_self {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : multiplicity p p = 1 :=
multiplicity.multiplicity_self hp.prime.not_unit hp.ne_zero
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_self Nat.Prime.multiplicity_self
theorem multiplicity_pow_self {p n : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : multiplicity p (p ^ n) = n :=
multiplicity.multiplicity_pow_self hp.ne_zero hp.prime.not_unit n
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_pow_self Nat.Prime.multiplicity_pow_self
/-- **Legendre's Theorem**
The multiplicity of a prime in `n!` is the sum of the quotients `n / p ^ i`. This sum is expressed
over the finset `Ico 1 b` where `b` is any bound greater than `log p n`. -/
theorem multiplicity_factorial {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
∀ {n b : ℕ}, log p n < b → multiplicity p n ! = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, n / p ^ i : ℕ)
| 0, b, _ => by simp [Ico, hp.multiplicity_one]
| n + 1, b, hb =>
calc
multiplicity p (n + 1)! = multiplicity p n ! + multiplicity p (n + 1) := by
rw [factorial_succ, hp.multiplicity_mul, add_comm]
_ = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, n / p ^ i : ℕ) +
((Finset.Ico 1 b).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n + 1).card := by
rw [multiplicity_factorial hp ((log_mono_right <| le_succ _).trans_lt hb), ←
multiplicity_eq_card_pow_dvd hp.ne_one (succ_pos _) hb]
_ = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, (n / p ^ i + if p ^ i ∣ n + 1 then 1 else 0) : ℕ) := by
rw [sum_add_distrib, sum_boole]
simp
_ = (∑ i ∈ Ico 1 b, (n + 1) / p ^ i : ℕ) :=
congr_arg _ <| Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => (succ_div _ _).symm
#align nat.prime.multiplicity_factorial Nat.Prime.multiplicity_factorial
/-- For a prime number `p`, taking `(p - 1)` times the multiplicity of `p` in `n!` equals `n` minus
the sum of base `p` digits of `n`. -/
theorem sub_one_mul_multiplicity_factorial {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
(p - 1) * (multiplicity p n !).get (finite_nat_iff.mpr ⟨hp.ne_one, factorial_pos n⟩) =
n - (p.digits n).sum := by
simp only [multiplicity_factorial hp <| lt_succ_of_lt <| lt.base (log p n),
← Finset.sum_Ico_add' _ 0 _ 1, Ico_zero_eq_range,
← sub_one_mul_sum_log_div_pow_eq_sub_sum_digits]
rfl
/-- The multiplicity of `p` in `(p * (n + 1))!` is one more than the sum
of the multiplicities of `p` in `(p * n)!` and `n + 1`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Multiplicity.lean | 138 | 158 | theorem multiplicity_factorial_mul_succ {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) :
multiplicity p (p * (n + 1))! = multiplicity p (p * n)! + multiplicity p (n + 1) + 1 := by |
have hp' := hp.prime
have h0 : 2 ≤ p := hp.two_le
have h1 : 1 ≤ p * n + 1 := Nat.le_add_left _ _
have h2 : p * n + 1 ≤ p * (n + 1) := by linarith
have h3 : p * n + 1 ≤ p * (n + 1) + 1 := by omega
have hm : multiplicity p (p * n)! ≠ ⊤ := by
rw [Ne, eq_top_iff_not_finite, Classical.not_not, finite_nat_iff]
exact ⟨hp.ne_one, factorial_pos _⟩
revert hm
have h4 : ∀ m ∈ Ico (p * n + 1) (p * (n + 1)), multiplicity p m = 0 := by
intro m hm
rw [multiplicity_eq_zero, ← not_dvd_iff_between_consec_multiples _ hp.pos]
rw [mem_Ico] at hm
exact ⟨n, lt_of_succ_le hm.1, hm.2⟩
simp_rw [← prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial, multiplicity.Finset.prod hp', ← sum_Ico_consecutive _ h1 h3,
add_assoc]
intro h
rw [PartENat.add_left_cancel_iff h, sum_Ico_succ_top h2, multiplicity.mul hp',
hp.multiplicity_self, sum_congr rfl h4, sum_const_zero, zero_add, add_comm (1 : PartENat)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.ChebyshevMarkov
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.CompareExp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.TriangleInequality
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.OpenPos
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Compact
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# Lp space
This file provides the space `Lp E p μ` as the subtype of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun)
such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. For `1 ≤ p`, `snorm` defines a norm and `Lp` is a complete metric
space.
## Main definitions
* `Lp E p μ` : elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` (see ae_eq_fun) such that `snorm f p μ` is finite. Defined
as an `AddSubgroup` of `α →ₘ[μ] E`.
Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `Lp`. We define this action, and prove
that it is continuous. In particular,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLp` defines the action on `Lp` of a continuous linear map.
* `Lp.posPart` is the positive part of an `Lp` function.
* `Lp.negPart` is the negative part of an `Lp` function.
When `α` is a topological space equipped with a finite Borel measure, there is a bounded linear map
from the normed space of bounded continuous functions (`α →ᵇ E`) to `Lp E p μ`. We construct this
as `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp`.
## Notations
* `α →₁[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 1 μ`.
* `α →₂[μ] E` : the type `Lp E 2 μ`.
## Implementation
Since `Lp` is defined as an `AddSubgroup`, dot notation does not work. Use `Lp.Measurable f` to
say that the coercion of `f` to a genuine function is measurable, instead of the non-working
`f.Measurable`.
To prove that two `Lp` elements are equal, it suffices to show that their coercions to functions
coincide almost everywhere (this is registered as an `ext` rule). This can often be done using
`filter_upwards`. For instance, a proof from first principles that `f + (g + h) = (f + g) + h`
could read (in the `Lp` namespace)
```
example (f g h : Lp E p μ) : (f + g) + h = f + (g + h) := by
ext1
filter_upwards [coeFn_add (f + g) h, coeFn_add f g, coeFn_add f (g + h), coeFn_add g h]
with _ ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, add_assoc]
```
The lemma `coeFn_add` states that the coercion of `f + g` coincides almost everywhere with the sum
of the coercions of `f` and `g`. All such lemmas use `coeFn` in their name, to distinguish the
function coercion from the coercion to almost everywhere defined functions.
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory Uniformity
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
/-!
### Lp space
The space of equivalence classes of measurable functions for which `snorm f p μ < ∞`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem snorm_aeeqFun {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
{p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hf) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _)
#align measure_theory.snorm_ae_eq_fun MeasureTheory.snorm_aeeqFun
theorem Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top {α E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) :
snorm (AEEqFun.mk f hfp.1) p μ < ∞ := by simp [hfp.2]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top
/-- Lp space -/
def Lp {α} (E : Type*) {m : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : AddSubgroup (α →ₘ[μ] E) where
carrier := { f | snorm f p μ < ∞ }
zero_mem' := by simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := by
simp [snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add f g),
snorm_add_lt_top ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ ⟨g.aestronglyMeasurable, hg⟩]
neg_mem' {f} hf := by rwa [Set.mem_setOf_eq, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_neg f), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp MeasureTheory.Lp
-- Porting note: calling the first argument `α` breaks the `(α := ·)` notation
scoped notation:25 α' " →₁[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 1 μ
scoped notation:25 α' " →₂[" μ "] " E => MeasureTheory.Lp (α := α') E 2 μ
namespace Memℒp
/-- make an element of Lp from a function verifying `Memℒp` -/
def toLp (f : α → E) (h_mem_ℒp : Memℒp f p μ) : Lp E p μ :=
⟨AEEqFun.mk f h_mem_ℒp.1, h_mem_ℒp.snorm_mk_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp
theorem coeFn_toLp {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.toLp f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_mk _ _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.coe_fn_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Memℒp.coeFn_toLp
theorem toLp_congr {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
hf.toLp f = hg.toLp g := by simp [toLp, hfg]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_congr MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_congr
@[simp]
theorem toLp_eq_toLp_iff {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
hf.toLp f = hg.toLp g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by simp [toLp]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_eq_to_Lp_iff MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_eq_toLp_iff
@[simp]
theorem toLp_zero (h : Memℒp (0 : α → E) p μ) : h.toLp 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_zero MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_zero
theorem toLp_add {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
(hf.add hg).toLp (f + g) = hf.toLp f + hg.toLp g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_add MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_add
theorem toLp_neg {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.neg.toLp (-f) = -hf.toLp f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_neg MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_neg
theorem toLp_sub {f g : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
(hf.sub hg).toLp (f - g) = hf.toLp f - hg.toLp g :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_sub MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_sub
end Memℒp
namespace Lp
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (Lp E p μ) (fun _ => α → E) :=
⟨fun f => ((f : α →ₘ[μ] E) : α → E)⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.Lp.instCoeFun
@[ext high]
theorem ext {f g : Lp E p μ} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : f = g := by
cases f
cases g
simp only [Subtype.mk_eq_mk]
exact AEEqFun.ext h
#align measure_theory.Lp.ext MeasureTheory.Lp.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : Lp E p μ} : f = g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h], fun h => ext h⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.ext_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.ext_iff
theorem mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ snorm f p μ < ∞ := Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top
theorem mem_Lp_iff_memℒp {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} : f ∈ Lp E p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ := by
simp [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, Memℒp, f.stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_iff_memℒp
protected theorem antitone [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {p q : ℝ≥0∞} (hpq : p ≤ q) : Lp E q μ ≤ Lp E p μ :=
fun f hf => (Memℒp.memℒp_of_exponent_le ⟨f.aestronglyMeasurable, hf⟩ hpq).2
#align measure_theory.Lp.antitone MeasureTheory.Lp.antitone
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α → E) = f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_mk MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_mk
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_mk {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (hf : snorm f p μ < ∞) : ((⟨f, hf⟩ : Lp E p μ) : α →ₘ[μ] E) = f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_mk MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem toLp_coeFn (f : Lp E p μ) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : hf.toLp f = f := by
cases f
simp [Memℒp.toLp]
#align measure_theory.Lp.to_Lp_coe_fn MeasureTheory.Lp.toLp_coeFn
theorem snorm_lt_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ :=
f.prop
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_lt_top
theorem snorm_ne_top (f : Lp E p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
(snorm_lt_top f).ne
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_ne_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_ne_top
@[measurability]
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (f : Lp E p μ) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
f.val.stronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.Lp.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Lp.stronglyMeasurable
@[measurability]
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable (f : Lp E p μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
f.val.aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Lp.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem memℒp (f : Lp E p μ) : Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f, f.prop⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.memℒp
variable (E p μ)
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : Lp E p μ) =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_zero
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_zero
variable {E p μ}
theorem coeFn_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(-f) =ᵐ[μ] -f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_neg _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_neg
theorem coeFn_add (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f + g) =ᵐ[μ] f + g :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_add _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_add MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_add
theorem coeFn_sub (f g : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(f - g) =ᵐ[μ] f - g :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_sub _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_sub MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_sub
theorem const_mem_Lp (α) {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
@AEEqFun.const α _ _ μ _ c ∈ Lp E p μ :=
(memℒp_const c).snorm_mk_lt_top
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_const MeasureTheory.Lp.const_mem_Lp
instance instNorm : Norm (Lp E p μ) where norm f := ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ)
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_norm MeasureTheory.Lp.instNorm
-- note: we need this to be defeq to the instance from `SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm`, so
-- can't use `ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ)`
instance instNNNorm : NNNorm (Lp E p μ) where nnnorm f := ⟨‖f‖, ENNReal.toReal_nonneg⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_nnnorm MeasureTheory.Lp.instNNNorm
instance instDist : Dist (Lp E p μ) where dist f g := ‖f - g‖
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_dist MeasureTheory.Lp.instDist
instance instEDist : EDist (Lp E p μ) where edist f g := snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_edist MeasureTheory.Lp.instEDist
theorem norm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_def MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_def
theorem nnnorm_def (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖f‖₊ = ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_def MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_def
@[simp, norm_cast]
protected theorem coe_nnnorm (f : Lp E p μ) : (‖f‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖f‖ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_nnnorm MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_nnnorm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nnnorm_coe_ennreal (f : Lp E p μ) : (‖f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = snorm f p μ :=
ENNReal.coe_toNNReal <| Lp.snorm_ne_top f
@[simp]
theorem norm_toLp (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : ‖hf.toLp f‖ = ENNReal.toReal (snorm f p μ) := by
erw [norm_def, snorm_congr_ae (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp hf)]
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_toLp
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_toLp (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
‖hf.toLp f‖₊ = ENNReal.toNNReal (snorm f p μ) :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_toLp f hf
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_toLp
theorem coe_nnnorm_toLp {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : (‖hf.toLp f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) = snorm f p μ := by
rw [nnnorm_toLp f hf, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal hf.2.ne]
theorem dist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ).toReal := by
simp_rw [dist, norm_def]
refine congr_arg _ ?_
apply snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_sub _ _)
#align measure_theory.Lp.dist_def MeasureTheory.Lp.dist_def
theorem edist_def (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = snorm (⇑f - ⇑g) p μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_def MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_def
protected theorem edist_dist (f g : Lp E p μ) : edist f g = .ofReal (dist f g) := by
rw [edist_def, dist_def, ← snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_sub _ _),
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (snorm_ne_top (f - g))]
protected theorem dist_edist (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = (edist f g).toReal :=
MeasureTheory.Lp.dist_def ..
theorem dist_eq_norm (f g : Lp E p μ) : dist f g = ‖f - g‖ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem edist_toLp_toLp (f g : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : Memℒp g p μ) :
edist (hf.toLp f) (hg.toLp g) = snorm (f - g) p μ := by
rw [edist_def]
exact snorm_congr_ae (hf.coeFn_toLp.sub hg.coeFn_toLp)
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_to_Lp_to_Lp MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_toLp_toLp
@[simp]
theorem edist_toLp_zero (f : α → E) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : edist (hf.toLp f) 0 = snorm f p μ := by
convert edist_toLp_toLp f 0 hf zero_memℒp
simp
#align measure_theory.Lp.edist_to_Lp_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.edist_toLp_zero
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_zero : ‖(0 : Lp E p μ)‖₊ = 0 := by
rw [nnnorm_def]
change (snorm (⇑(0 : α →ₘ[μ] E)) p μ).toNNReal = 0
simp [snorm_congr_ae AEEqFun.coeFn_zero, snorm_zero]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : ‖(0 : Lp E p μ)‖ = 0 :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) nnnorm_zero
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_measure_zero (f : Lp E p (0 : MeasureTheory.Measure α)) : ‖f‖ = 0 := by
simp [norm_def]
@[simp] theorem norm_exponent_zero (f : Lp E 0 μ) : ‖f‖ = 0 := by simp [norm_def]
theorem nnnorm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ‖f‖₊ = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf => by simp [hf]⟩
rw [nnnorm_def, ENNReal.toNNReal_eq_zero_iff] at hf
cases hf with
| inl hf =>
rw [snorm_eq_zero_iff (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f) hp.ne.symm] at hf
exact Subtype.eq (AEEqFun.ext (hf.trans AEEqFun.coeFn_zero.symm))
| inr hf =>
exact absurd hf (snorm_ne_top f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_eq_zero_iff
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {f : Lp E p μ} (hp : 0 < p) : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
NNReal.coe_eq_zero.trans (nnnorm_eq_zero_iff hp)
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero {f : Lp E p μ} : f = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [← (Lp.memℒp f).toLp_eq_toLp_iff zero_memℒp, Memℒp.toLp_zero, toLp_coeFn]
#align measure_theory.Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖-f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ := by
rw [nnnorm_def, nnnorm_def, snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_neg _), snorm_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_neg
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (nnnorm_neg f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_neg MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_neg
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ≥0} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g‖₊ := by
simp only [nnnorm_def]
have := snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul h p
rwa [← ENNReal.toNNReal_le_toNNReal, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.toNNReal_mul,
ENNReal.toNNReal_coe] at this
· exact (Lp.memℒp _).snorm_ne_top
· exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top (Lp.memℒp _).snorm_ne_top
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ} {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ c * ‖g‖ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with hc | hc
· lift c to ℝ≥0 using hc
exact NNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr (nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_of_ae_le_mul h)
· simp only [norm_def]
have := snorm_eq_zero_and_zero_of_ae_le_mul_neg h hc p
simp [this]
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem norm_le_norm_of_ae_le {f : Lp E p μ} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
‖f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ := by
rw [norm_def, norm_def, ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (snorm_ne_top _) (snorm_ne_top _)]
exact snorm_mono_ae h
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_norm_of_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_norm_of_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ≥0} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_nnnorm_le_mul (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le_mul
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul {c : ℝ} {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_le_mul (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul
theorem mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_le (Lp.memℒp g) f.aestronglyMeasurable h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_le {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} {g : Lp F p μ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_of_nnnorm_ae_le h
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ≥0)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable _ hfC
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem mem_Lp_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α →ₘ[μ] E} (C : ℝ) (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
f ∈ Lp E p μ :=
mem_Lp_iff_memℒp.2 <| Memℒp.of_bound f.aestronglyMeasurable _ hfC
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound
theorem nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ≥0}
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) : ‖f‖₊ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * C := by
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· by_cases hp : p.toReal⁻¹ = 0
· simp [hp, hμ, nnnorm_def]
· simp [hμ, nnnorm_def, Real.zero_rpow hp]
rw [← ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_def, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (snorm_ne_top _)]
refine (snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_eq ?_
rw [← coe_measureUnivNNReal μ, ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).ne',
ENNReal.coe_mul, mul_comm, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound
theorem norm_le_of_ae_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : Lp E p μ} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : ‖f‖ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * C := by
lift C to ℝ≥0 using hC
have := nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound hfC
rwa [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_rpow] at this
#align measure_theory.Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.Lp.norm_le_of_ae_bound
instance instNormedAddCommGroup [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedAddCommGroup (Lp E p μ) :=
{ AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := (norm : Lp E p μ → ℝ)
map_zero' := norm_zero
neg' := by simp
add_le' := fun f g => by
suffices (‖f + g‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖f‖₊ + ‖g‖₊ from mod_cast this
simp only [Lp.nnnorm_coe_ennreal]
exact (snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_add _ _)).trans_le
(snorm_add_le (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _) (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable _) hp.out)
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun f =>
(norm_eq_zero_iff <| zero_lt_one.trans_le hp.1).1 } with
edist := edist
edist_dist := Lp.edist_dist }
#align measure_theory.Lp.normed_add_comm_group MeasureTheory.Lp.instNormedAddCommGroup
-- check no diamond is created
example [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : PseudoEMetricSpace.toEDist = (Lp.instEDist : EDist (Lp E p μ)) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
example [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm = (Lp.instNNNorm : NNNorm (Lp E p μ)) := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
section BoundedSMul
variable {𝕜 𝕜' : Type*}
variable [NormedRing 𝕜] [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜' E]
variable [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' E]
theorem const_smul_mem_Lp (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : c • (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) ∈ Lp E p μ := by
rw [mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top, snorm_congr_ae (AEEqFun.coeFn_smul _ _)]
refine (snorm_const_smul_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
rw [ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
exact Or.inl ⟨ENNReal.coe_lt_top, f.prop⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_Lp_const_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.const_smul_mem_Lp
variable (E p μ 𝕜)
/-- The `𝕜`-submodule of elements of `α →ₘ[μ] E` whose `Lp` norm is finite. This is `Lp E p μ`,
with extra structure. -/
def LpSubmodule : Submodule 𝕜 (α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
{ Lp E p μ with smul_mem' := fun c f hf => by simpa using const_smul_mem_Lp c ⟨f, hf⟩ }
#align measure_theory.Lp.Lp_submodule MeasureTheory.Lp.LpSubmodule
variable {E p μ 𝕜}
theorem coe_LpSubmodule : (LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜).toAddSubgroup = Lp E p μ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_Lp_submodule MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_LpSubmodule
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
{ (LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜).module with }
#align measure_theory.Lp.module MeasureTheory.Lp.instModule
theorem coeFn_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : Lp E p μ) : ⇑(c • f) =ᵐ[μ] c • ⇑f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_smul
instance instIsCentralScalar [Module 𝕜ᵐᵒᵖ E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜ᵐᵒᵖ E] [IsCentralScalar 𝕜 E] :
IsCentralScalar 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) where
op_smul_eq_smul k f := Subtype.ext <| op_smul_eq_smul k (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
#align measure_theory.Lp.is_central_scalar MeasureTheory.Lp.instIsCentralScalar
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' E] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' (Lp E p μ) where
smul_comm k k' f := Subtype.ext <| smul_comm k k' (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
#align measure_theory.Lp.smul_comm_class MeasureTheory.Lp.instSMulCommClass
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul 𝕜 𝕜'] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' E] : IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' (Lp E p μ) where
smul_assoc k k' f := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc k k' (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)
instance instBoundedSMul [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : BoundedSMul 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) :=
-- TODO: add `BoundedSMul.of_nnnorm_smul_le`
BoundedSMul.of_norm_smul_le fun r f => by
suffices (‖r • f‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ‖r‖₊ * ‖f‖₊ from mod_cast this
rw [nnnorm_def, nnnorm_def, ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _),
snorm_congr_ae (coeFn_smul _ _), ENNReal.coe_toNNReal (Lp.snorm_ne_top _)]
exact snorm_const_smul_le r f
#align measure_theory.Lp.has_bounded_smul MeasureTheory.Lp.instBoundedSMul
end BoundedSMul
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
instance instNormedSpace [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedSpace 𝕜 (Lp E p μ) where
norm_smul_le _ _ := norm_smul_le _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.normed_space MeasureTheory.Lp.instNormedSpace
end NormedSpace
end Lp
namespace Memℒp
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
theorem toLp_const_smul {f : α → E} (c : 𝕜) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
(hf.const_smul c).toLp (c • f) = c • hf.toLp f :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.to_Lp_const_smul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.toLp_const_smul
end Memℒp
/-! ### Indicator of a set as an element of Lᵖ
For a set `s` with `(hs : MeasurableSet s)` and `(hμs : μ s < ∞)`, we build
`indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c`, the element of `Lp` corresponding to `s.indicator (fun _ => c)`.
-/
section Indicator
variable {c : E} {f : α → E} {hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ} {s : Set α}
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_le (s : Set α) (f : α → G) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator f) μ ≤ snormEssSup f μ := by
refine essSup_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [ENNReal.coe_le_coe, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
exact Set.indicator_le_self s _ x
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_le
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_const_le (s : Set α) (c : G) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator fun _ : α => c) μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ := by
by_cases hμ0 : μ = 0
· rw [hμ0, snormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact zero_le _
· exact (snormEssSup_indicator_le s fun _ => c).trans (snormEssSup_const c hμ0).le
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_const_le
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq (s : Set α) (c : G) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖₊ := by
refine le_antisymm (snormEssSup_indicator_const_le s c) ?_
by_contra! h
have h' := ae_iff.mp (ae_lt_of_essSup_lt h)
push_neg at h'
refine hμs (measure_mono_null (fun x hx_mem => ?_) h')
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.indicator_of_mem hx_mem]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_const_eq MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq
theorem snorm_indicator_le (f : α → E) : snorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ snorm f p μ := by
refine snorm_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => ?_)
suffices ‖s.indicator f x‖₊ ≤ ‖f x‖₊ by exact NNReal.coe_mono this
rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
exact s.indicator_le_self _ x
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_le
theorem snorm_indicator_const₀ {c : G} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
have hp_pos : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top
calc
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ
= (∫⁻ x, ((‖(s.indicator fun _ ↦ c) x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp hp_top
_ = (∫⁻ x, (s.indicator fun _ ↦ (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) x ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
congr 2
refine (Set.comp_indicator_const c (fun x : G ↦ (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal) ?_)
simp [hp_pos]
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [lintegral_indicator_const₀ hs, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
mul_one_div_cancel hp_pos.ne', ENNReal.rpow_one]
positivity
theorem snorm_indicator_const {c : G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
snorm_indicator_const₀ hs.nullMeasurableSet hp hp_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const
theorem snorm_indicator_const' {c : G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ 0) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, snormEssSup_indicator_const_eq s c hμs]
· exact snorm_indicator_const hs hp hp_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const' MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const'
theorem snorm_indicator_const_le (c : G) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_zero, zero_le']
rcases eq_or_ne p ∞ with (rfl | h'p)
· simp only [snorm_exponent_top, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one]
exact snormEssSup_indicator_const_le _ _
let t := toMeasurable μ s
calc
snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ snorm (t.indicator fun _ => c) p μ :=
snorm_mono (norm_indicator_le_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) _)
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ t ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
(snorm_indicator_const (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) hp h'p)
_ = ‖c‖₊ * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by rw [measure_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_const_le MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_const_le
theorem Memℒp.indicator (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (s.indicator f) p μ :=
⟨hf.aestronglyMeasurable.indicator hs, lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_indicator_le f) hf.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.indicator MeasureTheory.Memℒp.indicator
theorem snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict {f : α → F} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snormEssSup (s.indicator f) μ = snormEssSup f (μ.restrict s) := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup, nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_indicator,
ENNReal.essSup_indicator_eq_essSup_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_indicator_eq_snorm_ess_sup_restrict MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict
theorem snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict {f : α → F} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snorm (s.indicator f) p μ = snorm f p (μ.restrict s) := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, snorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top]
exact snormEssSup_indicator_eq_snormEssSup_restrict hs
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_zero hp_top]
suffices (∫⁻ x, (‖s.indicator f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) =
∫⁻ x in s, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ by rw [this]
rw [← lintegral_indicator _ hs]
congr
simp_rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_indicator]
have h_zero : (fun x => x ^ p.toReal) (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := by
simp [ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_zero hp_top]
-- Porting note: The implicit argument should be specified because the elaborator can't deal with
-- `∘` well.
exact (Set.indicator_comp_of_zero (g := fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x ^ p.toReal) h_zero).symm
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict
theorem memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Memℒp (s.indicator f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s) := by
simp [Memℒp, aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs, snorm_indicator_eq_snorm_restrict hs]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_indicator_iff_restrict MeasureTheory.memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict
/-- If a function is supported on a finite-measure set and belongs to `ℒ^p`, then it belongs to
`ℒ^q` for any `q ≤ p`. -/
theorem Memℒp.memℒp_of_exponent_le_of_measure_support_ne_top
{p q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hfq : Memℒp f q μ) {s : Set α} (hf : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0)
(hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hpq : p ≤ q) : Memℒp f p μ := by
have : (toMeasurable μ s).indicator f = f := by
apply Set.indicator_eq_self.2
apply Function.support_subset_iff'.2 (fun x hx ↦ hf x ?_)
contrapose! hx
exact subset_toMeasurable μ s hx
rw [← this, memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)] at hfq ⊢
have : Fact (μ (toMeasurable μ s) < ∞) := ⟨by simpa [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using hs⟩
exact memℒp_of_exponent_le hfq hpq
theorem memℒp_indicator_const (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (c : E) (hμsc : c = 0 ∨ μ s ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ := by
rw [memℒp_indicator_iff_restrict hs]
rcases hμsc with rfl | hμ
· exact zero_memℒp
· have := Fact.mk hμ.lt_top
apply memℒp_const
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_indicator_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_indicator_const
/-- The `ℒ^p` norm of the indicator of a set is uniformly small if the set itself has small measure,
for any `p < ∞`. Given here as an existential `∀ ε > 0, ∃ η > 0, ...` to avoid later
management of `ℝ≥0∞`-arithmetic. -/
theorem exists_snorm_indicator_le (hp : p ≠ ∞) (c : E) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : ε ≠ 0) :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ ∀ s : Set α, μ s ≤ η → snorm (s.indicator fun _ => c) p μ ≤ ε := by
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | h'p)
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ => by simp⟩
have hp₀ : 0 < p := bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 h'p
have hp₀' : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := div_nonneg zero_le_one ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
have hp₀'' : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp₀.ne' hp
obtain ⟨η, hη_pos, hη_le⟩ :
∃ η : ℝ≥0, 0 < η ∧ (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * (η : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ε := by
have :
Filter.Tendsto (fun x : ℝ≥0 => ((‖c‖₊ * x ^ (1 / p.toReal) : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞)) (𝓝 0)
(𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0)) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
convert (NNReal.continuousAt_rpow_const (Or.inr hp₀')).tendsto.const_mul _
simp [hp₀''.ne']
have hε' : 0 < ε := hε.bot_lt
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, hδε'⟩ :=
NNReal.nhds_zero_basis.eventually_iff.mp (eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt hε' this)
obtain ⟨η, hη, hηδ⟩ := exists_between hδ
refine ⟨η, hη, ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp₀', ← ENNReal.coe_mul]
exact hδε' hηδ
refine ⟨η, hη_pos, fun s hs => ?_⟩
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans (le_trans ?_ hη_le)
exact mul_le_mul_left' (ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow hs hp₀') _
#align measure_theory.exists_snorm_indicator_le MeasureTheory.exists_snorm_indicator_le
protected lemma Memℒp.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] {g}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s)) (hg : Memℒp g p (μ.restrict sᶜ)) :
Memℒp (s.piecewise f g) p μ := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable]
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.piecewise hs hf.1 hg.1
refine ⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.piecewise hs hf.1 hg.1, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_ne p ∞ with rfl | hp_top
· rw [snorm_top_piecewise f g hs]
exact max_lt hf.2 hg.2
rw [snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top, ← lintegral_add_compl _ hs,
ENNReal.add_lt_top]
constructor
· have h : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ s →
(‖Set.piecewise s f g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal = (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal := by
filter_upwards with a ha using by simp [ha]
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun hs h]
exact lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top hf.2
· have h : ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, x ∈ sᶜ →
(‖Set.piecewise s f g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal = (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal := by
filter_upwards with a ha
have ha' : a ∉ s := ha
simp [ha']
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun hs.compl h]
exact lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_zero hp_top hg.2
end Indicator
section IndicatorConstLp
open Set Function
variable {s : Set α} {hs : MeasurableSet s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {c : E}
/-- Indicator of a set as an element of `Lp`. -/
def indicatorConstLp (p : ℝ≥0∞) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) : Lp E p μ :=
Memℒp.toLp (s.indicator fun _ => c) (memℒp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp
/-- A version of `Set.indicator_add` for `MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp`.-/
theorem indicatorConstLp_add {c' : E} :
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c + indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c' =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs (c + c') := by
simp_rw [indicatorConstLp, ← Memℒp.toLp_add, indicator_add]
rfl
/-- A version of `Set.indicator_sub` for `MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp`.-/
theorem indicatorConstLp_sub {c' : E} :
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c - indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c' =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs (c - c') := by
simp_rw [indicatorConstLp, ← Memℒp.toLp_sub, indicator_sub]
rfl
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn : ⇑(indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator fun _ => c :=
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_indicator_const p hs c (Or.inr hμs))
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn_mem : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, x ∈ s → indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c x = c :=
indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.trans (Set.indicator_of_mem hxs _)
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_mem MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn_mem
theorem indicatorConstLp_coeFn_nmem : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, x ∉ s → indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c x = 0 :=
indicatorConstLp_coeFn.mono fun _x hx hxs => hx.trans (Set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs _)
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_coe_fn_nmem MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_coeFn_nmem
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicatorConstLp_coeFn,
snorm_indicator_const hs hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_rpow,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp_top (hμs_ne_zero : μ s ≠ 0) :
‖indicatorConstLp ∞ hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_congr_ae indicatorConstLp_coeFn,
snorm_indicator_const' hs hμs_ne_zero ENNReal.top_ne_zero, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero,
ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp_top MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp_top
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp' (hp_pos : p ≠ 0) (hμs_pos : μ s ≠ 0) :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· rw [hp_top, ENNReal.top_toReal, _root_.div_zero, Real.rpow_zero, mul_one]
exact norm_indicatorConstLp_top hμs_pos
· exact norm_indicatorConstLp hp_pos hp_top
#align measure_theory.norm_indicator_const_Lp' MeasureTheory.norm_indicatorConstLp'
theorem norm_indicatorConstLp_le :
‖indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * (μ s).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [indicatorConstLp, Lp.norm_toLp]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (by positivity) ?_
refine (snorm_indicator_const_le _ _).trans_eq ?_
rw [← coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_mul (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal,
ENNReal.toReal_rpow, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by positivity) hμs
theorem edist_indicatorConstLp_eq_nnnorm {t : Set α} {ht : MeasurableSet t} {hμt : μ t ≠ ∞} :
edist (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) (indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c) =
‖indicatorConstLp p (hs.symmDiff ht) (measure_symmDiff_ne_top hμs hμt) c‖₊ := by
unfold indicatorConstLp
rw [Lp.edist_toLp_toLp, snorm_indicator_sub_indicator, Lp.coe_nnnorm_toLp]
theorem dist_indicatorConstLp_eq_norm {t : Set α} {ht : MeasurableSet t} {hμt : μ t ≠ ∞} :
dist (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) (indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c) =
‖indicatorConstLp p (hs.symmDiff ht) (measure_symmDiff_ne_top hμs hμt) c‖ := by
rw [Lp.dist_edist, edist_indicatorConstLp_eq_nnnorm, ENNReal.coe_toReal, Lp.coe_nnnorm]
@[simp]
theorem indicatorConstLp_empty :
indicatorConstLp p MeasurableSet.empty (by simp : μ ∅ ≠ ∞) c = 0 := by
simp only [indicatorConstLp, Set.indicator_empty', Memℒp.toLp_zero]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_empty MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_empty
theorem indicatorConstLp_inj {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) {c : E} (hc : c ≠ 0)
(h : indicatorConstLp p hs hsμ c = indicatorConstLp p ht htμ c) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
.of_indicator_const hc <|
calc
s.indicator (fun _ ↦ c) =ᵐ[μ] indicatorConstLp p hs hsμ c := indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm
_ = indicatorConstLp p ht htμ c := by rw [h]
_ =ᵐ[μ] t.indicator (fun _ ↦ c) := indicatorConstLp_coeFn
theorem memℒp_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E} (h : Disjoint (support f) (support g))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
Memℒp (f + g) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ ∧ Memℒp g p μ := by
borelize E
refine ⟨fun hfg => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => h.1.add h.2⟩
· rw [← Set.indicator_add_eq_left h]; exact hfg.indicator (measurableSet_support hf.measurable)
· rw [← Set.indicator_add_eq_right h]; exact hfg.indicator (measurableSet_support hg.measurable)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_add_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.memℒp_add_of_disjoint
/-- The indicator of a disjoint union of two sets is the sum of the indicators of the sets. -/
theorem indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hμt : μ t ≠ ∞) (hst : s ∩ t = ∅) (c : E) :
indicatorConstLp p (hs.union ht) (measure_union_ne_top hμs hμt) c =
indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c + indicatorConstLp p ht hμt c := by
ext1
refine indicatorConstLp_coeFn.trans (EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm)
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm)
rw [Set.indicator_union_of_disjoint (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst) _]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_disjoint_union MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_disjoint_union
end IndicatorConstLp
section const
variable (μ p)
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E)
/-- Constant function as an element of `MeasureTheory.Lp` for a finite measure. -/
protected def Lp.const : E →+ Lp E p μ where
toFun c := ⟨AEEqFun.const α c, const_mem_Lp α μ c⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' _ _ := rfl
lemma Lp.coeFn_const : Lp.const p μ c =ᵐ[μ] Function.const α c :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_const α c
@[simp] lemma Lp.const_val : (Lp.const p μ c).1 = AEEqFun.const α c := rfl
@[simp]
lemma Memℒp.toLp_const : Memℒp.toLp _ (memℒp_const c) = Lp.const p μ c := rfl
@[simp]
lemma indicatorConstLp_univ :
indicatorConstLp p .univ (measure_ne_top μ _) c = Lp.const p μ c := by
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, indicatorConstLp]
simp only [Set.indicator_univ, Function.const]
theorem Lp.norm_const [NeZero μ] (hp_zero : p ≠ 0) :
‖Lp.const p μ c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
have := NeZero.ne μ
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, Lp.norm_toLp, snorm_const] <;> try assumption
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← ENNReal.toReal_rpow, coe_nnnorm]
theorem Lp.norm_const' (hp_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) :
‖Lp.const p μ c‖ = ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [← Memℒp.toLp_const, Lp.norm_toLp, snorm_const'] <;> try assumption
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.coe_toReal, ← ENNReal.toReal_rpow, coe_nnnorm]
theorem Lp.norm_const_le : ‖Lp.const p μ c‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [← indicatorConstLp_univ]
exact norm_indicatorConstLp_le
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.const` as a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps] protected def Lp.constₗ (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] :
E →ₗ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
toFun := Lp.const p μ
map_add' := map_add _
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
@[simps! apply]
protected def Lp.constL (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
E →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ :=
(Lp.constₗ p μ 𝕜).mkContinuous ((μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal)) fun _ ↦
(Lp.norm_const_le _ _ _).trans_eq (mul_comm _ _)
theorem Lp.norm_constL_le (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
‖(Lp.constL p μ 𝕜 : E →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)‖ ≤ (μ Set.univ).toReal ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by positivity) _
end const
theorem Memℒp.norm_rpow_div {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (q : ℝ≥0∞) :
Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal) (p / q) μ := by
refine ⟨(hf.1.norm.aemeasurable.pow_const q.toReal).aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
by_cases q_top : q = ∞
· simp [q_top]
by_cases q_zero : q = 0
· simp [q_zero]
by_cases p_zero : p = 0
· simp [p_zero]
rw [ENNReal.div_zero p_zero]
exact (memℒp_top_const (1 : ℝ)).2
rw [snorm_norm_rpow _ (ENNReal.toReal_pos q_zero q_top)]
apply ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal q_top, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel q_zero q_top,
mul_one]
exact hf.2.ne
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm_rpow_div MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm_rpow_div
theorem memℒp_norm_rpow_iff {q : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (q_zero : q ≠ 0)
(q_top : q ≠ ∞) : Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ q.toReal) (p / q) μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.norm_rpow_div q⟩
apply (memℒp_norm_iff hf).1
convert h.norm_rpow_div q⁻¹ using 1
· ext x
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), ← Real.rpow_mul (abs_nonneg _),
ENNReal.toReal_inv, mul_inv_cancel, abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), Real.rpow_one]
simp [ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, not_or, q_zero, q_top]
· rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel q_zero q_top,
mul_one]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_norm_rpow_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_norm_rpow_iff
theorem Memℒp.norm_rpow {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (fun x : α => ‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal) 1 μ := by
convert hf.norm_rpow_div p
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm_rpow MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm_rpow
theorem AEEqFun.compMeasurePreserving_mem_Lp {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
{μb : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {g : β →ₘ[μb] E} (hg : g ∈ Lp E p μb) {f : α → β}
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
g.compMeasurePreserving f hf ∈ Lp E p μ := by
rw [Lp.mem_Lp_iff_snorm_lt_top] at hg ⊢
rwa [snorm_compMeasurePreserving]
namespace Lp
/-! ### Composition with a measure preserving function -/
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] {μb : MeasureTheory.Measure β} {f : α → β}
/-- Composition of an `L^p` function with a measure preserving function is an `L^p` function. -/
def compMeasurePreserving (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →+ Lp E p μ where
toFun g := ⟨g.1.compMeasurePreserving f hf, g.1.compMeasurePreserving_mem_Lp g.2 hf⟩
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := by rintro ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
@[simp]
theorem compMeasurePreserving_val (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
(compMeasurePreserving f hf g).1 = g.1.compMeasurePreserving f hf :=
rfl
theorem coeFn_compMeasurePreserving (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
compMeasurePreserving f hf g =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
g.1.coeFn_compMeasurePreserving hf
@[simp]
theorem norm_compMeasurePreserving (g : Lp E p μb) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
‖compMeasurePreserving f hf g‖ = ‖g‖ :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toReal <| g.1.snorm_compMeasurePreserving hf
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [NormedRing 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E]
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.compMeasurePreserving` as a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def compMeasurePreservingₗ (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →ₗ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
__ := compMeasurePreserving f hf
map_smul' c g := by rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩; rfl
/-- `MeasureTheory.Lp.compMeasurePreserving` as a linear isometry. -/
@[simps!]
def compMeasurePreservingₗᵢ [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : α → β) (hf : MeasurePreserving f μ μb) :
Lp E p μb →ₗᵢ[𝕜] Lp E p μ where
toLinearMap := compMeasurePreservingₗ 𝕜 f hf
norm_map' := (norm_compMeasurePreserving · hf)
end Lp
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
/-!
### Composition on `L^p`
We show that Lipschitz functions vanishing at zero act by composition on `L^p`, and specialize
this to the composition with continuous linear maps, and to the definition of the positive
part of an `L^p` function.
-/
section Composition
variable {g : E → F} {c : ℝ≥0}
theorem LipschitzWith.comp_memℒp {α E F} {K} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(g0 : g 0 = 0) (hL : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ :=
have : ∀ x, ‖g (f x)‖ ≤ K * ‖f x‖ := fun x ↦ by
-- TODO: add `LipschitzWith.nnnorm_sub_le` and `LipschitzWith.nnnorm_le`
simpa [g0] using hg.norm_sub_le (f x) 0
hL.of_le_mul (hg.continuous.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hL.1) (eventually_of_forall this)
#align lipschitz_with.comp_mem_ℒp LipschitzWith.comp_memℒp
theorem MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_comp_antilipschitzWith {α E F} {K'} [MeasurableSpace α]
{μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F}
(hL : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ) (hg : UniformContinuous g) (hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g)
(g0 : g 0 = 0) : Memℒp f p μ := by
have A : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ K' * ‖g (f x)‖ := by
intro x
-- TODO: add `AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_nnnorm_sub` and `AntilipschitzWith.le_mul_norm`
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0]
apply hg'.le_mul_dist
have B : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
(hg'.uniformEmbedding hg).embedding.aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff.1 hL.1
exact hL.of_le_mul B (Filter.eventually_of_forall A)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_comp_antilipschitz_with MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_comp_antilipschitzWith
namespace LipschitzWith
theorem memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz {α E F} {K K'} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f : α → E} {g : E → F} (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(hg' : AntilipschitzWith K' g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => h.of_comp_antilipschitzWith hg.uniformContinuous hg' g0, fun h => hg.comp_memℒp g0 h⟩
#align lipschitz_with.mem_ℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz LipschitzWith.memℒp_comp_iff_of_antilipschitz
/-- When `g` is a Lipschitz function sending `0` to `0` and `f` is in `Lp`, then `g ∘ f` is well
defined as an element of `Lp`. -/
def compLp (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
⟨AEEqFun.comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E), by
suffices ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖AEEqFun.comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) x‖ ≤ c * ‖f x‖ from
Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_le_mul this
filter_upwards [AEEqFun.coeFn_comp g hg.continuous (f : α →ₘ[μ] E)] with a ha
simp only [ha]
rw [← dist_zero_right, ← dist_zero_right, ← g0]
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) 0⟩
#align lipschitz_with.comp_Lp LipschitzWith.compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
hg.compLp g0 f =ᵐ[μ] g ∘ f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_comp _ hg.continuous _
#align lipschitz_with.coe_fn_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.coeFn_compLp
@[simp]
theorem compLp_zero (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) : hg.compLp g0 (0 : Lp E p μ) = 0 := by
rw [Lp.eq_zero_iff_ae_eq_zero]
apply (coeFn_compLp _ _ _).trans
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_zero E p μ] with _ ha
simp only [ha, g0, Function.comp_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
#align lipschitz_with.comp_Lp_zero LipschitzWith.compLp_zero
theorem norm_compLp_sub_le (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f f' : Lp E p μ) :
‖hg.compLp g0 f - hg.compLp g0 f'‖ ≤ c * ‖f - f'‖ := by
apply Lp.norm_le_mul_norm_of_ae_le_mul
filter_upwards [hg.coeFn_compLp g0 f, hg.coeFn_compLp g0 f',
Lp.coeFn_sub (hg.compLp g0 f) (hg.compLp g0 f'), Lp.coeFn_sub f f'] with a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ← dist_eq_norm, Pi.sub_apply, Function.comp_apply]
exact hg.dist_le_mul (f a) (f' a)
#align lipschitz_with.norm_comp_Lp_sub_le LipschitzWith.norm_compLp_sub_le
theorem norm_compLp_le (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) (f : Lp E p μ) :
‖hg.compLp g0 f‖ ≤ c * ‖f‖ := by simpa using hg.norm_compLp_sub_le g0 f 0
#align lipschitz_with.norm_comp_Lp_le LipschitzWith.norm_compLp_le
theorem lipschitzWith_compLp [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
LipschitzWith c (hg.compLp g0 : Lp E p μ → Lp F p μ) :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun f g => by simp [dist_eq_norm, norm_compLp_sub_le]
#align lipschitz_with.lipschitz_with_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.lipschitzWith_compLp
theorem continuous_compLp [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hg : LipschitzWith c g) (g0 : g 0 = 0) :
Continuous (hg.compLp g0 : Lp E p μ → Lp F p μ) :=
(lipschitzWith_compLp hg g0).continuous
#align lipschitz_with.continuous_comp_Lp LipschitzWith.continuous_compLp
end LipschitzWith
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- Composing `f : Lp` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`. -/
def compLp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : Lp F p μ :=
L.lipschitz.compLp (map_zero L) f
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, (L.compLp f) a = L (f a) :=
LipschitzWith.coeFn_compLp _ _ _
#align continuous_linear_map.coe_fn_comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.coeFn_compLp
theorem coeFn_compLp' (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : L.compLp f =ᵐ[μ] fun a => L (f a) :=
L.coeFn_compLp f
#align continuous_linear_map.coe_fn_comp_Lp' ContinuousLinearMap.coeFn_compLp'
theorem comp_memℒp (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : Memℒp (L ∘ f) p μ :=
(Lp.memℒp (L.compLp f)).ae_eq (L.coeFn_compLp' f)
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_mem_ℒp ContinuousLinearMap.comp_memℒp
theorem comp_memℒp' (L : E →L[𝕜] F) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (L ∘ f) p μ :=
(L.comp_memℒp (hf.toLp f)).ae_eq (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hf.coeFn_toLp _)
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_mem_ℒp' ContinuousLinearMap.comp_memℒp'
section RCLike
variable {K : Type*} [RCLike K]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => (f x : K)) p μ :=
(@RCLike.ofRealCLM K _).comp_memℒp' hf
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_real MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.memℒp_re_im_iff {f : α → K} :
Memℒp (fun x ↦ RCLike.re (f x)) p μ ∧ Memℒp (fun x ↦ RCLike.im (f x)) p μ ↔
Memℒp f p μ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun hf => ⟨hf.re, hf.im⟩⟩
rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
convert MeasureTheory.Memℒp.add (E := K) hre.ofReal (him.ofReal.const_mul RCLike.I)
ext1 x
rw [Pi.add_apply, mul_comm, RCLike.re_add_im]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_re_im_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_re_im_iff
end RCLike
theorem add_compLp (L L' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) :
(L + L').compLp f = L.compLp f + L'.compLp f := by
ext1
refine (coeFn_compLp' (L + L') f).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (EventuallyEq.add (L.coeFn_compLp' f).symm (L'.coeFn_compLp' f).symm)
filter_upwards with x
rw [coe_add', Pi.add_def]
#align continuous_linear_map.add_comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.add_compLp
theorem smul_compLp {𝕜'} [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜' F] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' F] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' F]
(c : 𝕜') (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : (c • L).compLp f = c • L.compLp f := by
ext1
refine (coeFn_compLp' (c • L) f).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
refine (L.coeFn_compLp' f).mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.smul_apply, hx, coe_smul', Pi.smul_def]
#align continuous_linear_map.smul_comp_Lp ContinuousLinearMap.smul_compLp
theorem norm_compLp_le (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) : ‖L.compLp f‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f‖ :=
LipschitzWith.norm_compLp_le _ _ _
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_comp_Lp_le ContinuousLinearMap.norm_compLp_le
variable (μ p)
/-- Composing `f : Lp E p μ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`, seen as a `𝕜`-linear map on `Lp E p μ`. -/
def compLpₗ (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : Lp E p μ →ₗ[𝕜] Lp F p μ where
toFun f := L.compLp f
map_add' f g := by
ext1
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_add f g, coeFn_compLp L (f + g), coeFn_compLp L f,
coeFn_compLp L g, Lp.coeFn_add (L.compLp f) (L.compLp g)]
intro a ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4 ha5
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, ha5, map_add, Pi.add_apply]
map_smul' c f := by
dsimp
ext1
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_smul c f, coeFn_compLp L (c • f), Lp.coeFn_smul c (L.compLp f),
coeFn_compLp L f] with _ ha1 ha2 ha3 ha4
simp only [ha1, ha2, ha3, ha4, map_smul, Pi.smul_apply]
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_Lpₗ ContinuousLinearMap.compLpₗ
/-- Composing `f : Lp E p μ` with `L : E →L[𝕜] F`, seen as a continuous `𝕜`-linear map on
`Lp E p μ`. See also the similar
* `LinearMap.compLeft` for functions,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLeftContinuous` for continuous functions,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLeftContinuousBounded` for bounded continuous functions,
* `ContinuousLinearMap.compLeftContinuousCompact` for continuous functions on compact spaces.
-/
def compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : Lp E p μ →L[𝕜] Lp F p μ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous (L.compLpₗ p μ) ‖L‖ L.norm_compLp_le
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.compLpL
variable {μ p}
theorem coeFn_compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) (f : Lp E p μ) :
L.compLpL p μ f =ᵐ[μ] fun a => L (f a) :=
L.coeFn_compLp f
#align continuous_linear_map.coe_fn_comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.coeFn_compLpL
theorem add_compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L L' : E →L[𝕜] F) :
(L + L').compLpL p μ = L.compLpL p μ + L'.compLpL p μ := by ext1 f; exact add_compLp L L' f
#align continuous_linear_map.add_comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.add_compLpL
theorem smul_compLpL [Fact (1 ≤ p)] {𝕜'} [NormedRing 𝕜'] [Module 𝕜' F] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' F]
[SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' F] (c : 𝕜') (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : (c • L).compLpL p μ = c • L.compLpL p μ := by
ext1 f; exact smul_compLp c L f
#align continuous_linear_map.smul_comp_LpL ContinuousLinearMap.smul_compLpL
theorem norm_compLpL_le [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (L : E →L[𝕜] F) : ‖L.compLpL p μ‖ ≤ ‖L‖ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _) _
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_compLpL_le ContinuousLinearMap.norm_compLpL_le
end ContinuousLinearMap
namespace MeasureTheory
theorem indicatorConstLp_eq_toSpanSingleton_compLp {s : Set α} [NormedSpace ℝ F]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : F) :
indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs x =
(ContinuousLinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℝ x).compLp (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ)) := by
ext1
refine indicatorConstLp_coeFn.trans ?_
have h_compLp :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.toSpanSingleton ℝ x).coeFn_compLp (indicatorConstLp 2 hs hμs (1 : ℝ))
rw [← EventuallyEq] at h_compLp
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ h_compLp.symm
refine (@indicatorConstLp_coeFn _ _ _ 2 μ _ s hs hμs (1 : ℝ)).mono fun y hy => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hy]
simp_rw [ContinuousLinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply]
by_cases hy_mem : y ∈ s <;> simp [hy_mem, ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul_apply]
#align measure_theory.indicator_const_Lp_eq_to_span_singleton_comp_Lp MeasureTheory.indicatorConstLp_eq_toSpanSingleton_compLp
namespace Lp
section PosPart
theorem lipschitzWith_pos_part : LipschitzWith 1 fun x : ℝ => max x 0 :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun x y => by simp [Real.dist_eq, abs_max_sub_max_le_abs]
#align measure_theory.Lp.lipschitz_with_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.lipschitzWith_pos_part
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.pos_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => max (f x) 0) p μ :=
lipschitzWith_pos_part.comp_memℒp (max_eq_right le_rfl) hf
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.pos_part MeasureTheory.Memℒp.pos_part
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => max (-f x) 0) p μ :=
lipschitzWith_pos_part.comp_memℒp (max_eq_right le_rfl) hf.neg
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.neg_part MeasureTheory.Memℒp.neg_part
/-- Positive part of a function in `L^p`. -/
def posPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : Lp ℝ p μ :=
lipschitzWith_pos_part.compLp (max_eq_right le_rfl) f
#align measure_theory.Lp.pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.posPart
/-- Negative part of a function in `L^p`. -/
def negPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : Lp ℝ p μ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.Lp.neg_part MeasureTheory.Lp.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : (posPart f : α →ₘ[μ] ℝ) = (f : α →ₘ[μ] ℝ).posPart :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.coe_posPart
theorem coeFn_posPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ⇑(posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] fun a => max (f a) 0 :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_posPart _
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_posPart
theorem coeFn_negPart_eq_max (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, negPart f a = max (-f a) 0 := by
rw [negPart]
filter_upwards [coeFn_posPart (-f), coeFn_neg f] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, Pi.neg_apply]
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg_part_eq_max MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_negPart_eq_max
theorem coeFn_negPart (f : Lp ℝ p μ) : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, negPart f a = -min (f a) 0 :=
(coeFn_negPart_eq_max f).mono fun a h => by rw [h, ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
#align measure_theory.Lp.coe_fn_neg_part MeasureTheory.Lp.coeFn_negPart
theorem continuous_posPart [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : Continuous fun f : Lp ℝ p μ => posPart f :=
LipschitzWith.continuous_compLp _ _
#align measure_theory.Lp.continuous_pos_part MeasureTheory.Lp.continuous_posPart
theorem continuous_negPart [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : Continuous fun f : Lp ℝ p μ => negPart f := by
unfold negPart
exact continuous_posPart.comp continuous_neg
#align measure_theory.Lp.continuous_neg_part MeasureTheory.Lp.continuous_negPart
end PosPart
end Lp
end MeasureTheory
end Composition
/-!
## `L^p` is a complete space
We show that `L^p` is a complete space for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section CompleteSpace
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Lp
theorem snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf {ι} [Nonempty ι] [LinearOrder ι] {f : ι → α → G} {p : ℝ}
(hp_nonneg : 0 ≤ p) {f_lim : α → G}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm' f_lim p μ = (∫⁻ a, atTop.liminf fun m => (‖f m a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
suffices h_no_pow :
(∫⁻ a, (‖f_lim a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a, atTop.liminf fun m => (‖f m a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ by
rw [snorm', h_no_pow]
refine lintegral_congr_ae (h_lim.mono fun a ha => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Tendsto.liminf_eq]
simp_rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp_nonneg, ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
refine ((NNReal.continuous_rpow_const hp_nonneg).tendsto ‖f_lim a‖₊).comp ?_
exact (continuous_nnnorm.tendsto (f_lim a)).comp ha
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf
theorem snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℕ → α → E} {p : ℝ}
(hp_pos : 0 < p) (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) {f_lim : α → E}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm' f_lim p μ ≤ atTop.liminf fun n => snorm' (f n) p μ := by
rw [snorm'_lim_eq_lintegral_liminf hp_pos.le h_lim]
rw [← ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div]
refine (lintegral_liminf_le' fun m => (hf m).ennnorm.pow_const _).trans_eq ?_
have h_pow_liminf :
(atTop.liminf fun n => snorm' (f n) p μ) ^ p = atTop.liminf fun n => snorm' (f n) p μ ^ p := by
have h_rpow_mono := ENNReal.strictMono_rpow_of_pos hp_pos
have h_rpow_surj := (ENNReal.rpow_left_bijective hp_pos.ne.symm).2
refine (h_rpow_mono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ h_rpow_surj).liminf_apply ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
all_goals isBoundedDefault
rw [h_pow_liminf]
simp_rw [snorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel hp_pos.ne.symm, ENNReal.rpow_one]
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm'
theorem snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_essSup_liminf {ι} [Nonempty ι] [LinearOrder ι] {f : ι → α → G}
{f_lim : α → G} (h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim ∞ μ = essSup (fun x => atTop.liminf fun m => (‖f m x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ := by
rw [snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup]
refine essSup_congr_ae (h_lim.mono fun x hx => ?_)
dsimp only
apply (Tendsto.liminf_eq ..).symm
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact (continuous_nnnorm.tendsto (f_lim x)).comp hx
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_ess_sup_liminf MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_essSup_liminf
theorem snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top {ι} [Nonempty ι] [Countable ι]
[LinearOrder ι] {f : ι → α → F} {f_lim : α → F}
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim ∞ μ ≤ atTop.liminf fun n => snorm (f n) ∞ μ := by
rw [snorm_exponent_top_lim_eq_essSup_liminf h_lim]
simp_rw [snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup]
exact ENNReal.essSup_liminf_le fun n => fun x => (‖f n x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top
theorem snorm_lim_le_liminf_snorm {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (f_lim : α → E)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
snorm f_lim p μ ≤ atTop.liminf fun n => snorm (f n) p μ := by
obtain rfl|hp0 := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp_top]
exact snorm_exponent_top_lim_le_liminf_snorm_exponent_top h_lim
simp_rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top]
have hp_pos : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp0 hp_top
exact snorm'_lim_le_liminf_snorm' hp_pos hf h_lim
#align measure_theory.Lp.snorm_lim_le_liminf_snorm MeasureTheory.Lp.snorm_lim_le_liminf_snorm
/-! ### `Lp` is complete iff Cauchy sequences of `ℒp` have limits in `ℒp` -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp' {ι} {fi : Filter ι} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : ι → Lp E p μ)
(f_lim : Lp E p μ) :
fi.Tendsto f (𝓝 f_lim) ↔ fi.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (⇑(f n) - ⇑f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero]
simp_rw [dist_def]
rw [← ENNReal.zero_toReal, ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff (fun n => ?_) ENNReal.zero_ne_top]
rw [snorm_congr_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _).symm]
exact Lp.snorm_ne_top _
#align measure_theory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp' MeasureTheory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp'
theorem tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp {ι} {fi : Filter ι} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : ι → Lp E p μ)
(f_lim : α → E) (f_lim_ℒp : Memℒp f_lim p μ) :
fi.Tendsto f (𝓝 (f_lim_ℒp.toLp f_lim)) ↔
fi.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (⇑(f n) - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp']
suffices h_eq :
(fun n => snorm (⇑(f n) - ⇑(Memℒp.toLp f_lim f_lim_ℒp)) p μ) =
(fun n => snorm (⇑(f n) - f_lim) p μ) by
rw [h_eq]
exact funext fun n => snorm_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.rfl.sub (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp f_lim_ℒp))
#align measure_theory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp
theorem tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp'' {ι} {fi : Filter ι} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (f : ι → α → E)
(f_ℒp : ∀ n, Memℒp (f n) p μ) (f_lim : α → E) (f_lim_ℒp : Memℒp f_lim p μ) :
fi.Tendsto (fun n => (f_ℒp n).toLp (f n)) (𝓝 (f_lim_ℒp.toLp f_lim)) ↔
fi.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp' (fun n => (f_ℒp n).toLp (f n)) (f_lim_ℒp.toLp f_lim)]
refine Filter.tendsto_congr fun n => ?_
apply snorm_congr_ae
filter_upwards [((f_ℒp n).sub f_lim_ℒp).coeFn_toLp,
Lp.coeFn_sub ((f_ℒp n).toLp (f n)) (f_lim_ℒp.toLp f_lim)] with _ hx₁ hx₂
rw [← hx₂]
exact hx₁
#align measure_theory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp'' MeasureTheory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp''
theorem tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ℒp {ι} {fi : Filter ι} [Fact (1 ≤ p)] {f : ι → Lp E p μ}
(f_lim : α → E) (f_lim_ℒp : Memℒp f_lim p μ)
(h_tendsto : fi.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (⇑(f n) - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)) :
fi.Tendsto f (𝓝 (f_lim_ℒp.toLp f_lim)) :=
(tendsto_Lp_iff_tendsto_ℒp f f_lim f_lim_ℒp).mpr h_tendsto
#align measure_theory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ℒp
theorem cauchySeq_Lp_iff_cauchySeq_ℒp {ι} [Nonempty ι] [SemilatticeSup ι] [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)]
(f : ι → Lp E p μ) :
CauchySeq f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι × ι => snorm (⇑(f n.fst) - ⇑(f n.snd)) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simp_rw [cauchySeq_iff_tendsto_dist_atTop_0, dist_def]
rw [← ENNReal.zero_toReal, ENNReal.tendsto_toReal_iff (fun n => ?_) ENNReal.zero_ne_top]
rw [snorm_congr_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _).symm]
exact snorm_ne_top _
#align measure_theory.Lp.cauchy_seq_Lp_iff_cauchy_seq_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.cauchySeq_Lp_iff_cauchySeq_ℒp
theorem completeSpace_lp_of_cauchy_complete_ℒp [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)]
(H :
∀ (f : ℕ → α → E) (hf : ∀ n, Memℒp (f n) p μ) (B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞) (hB : ∑' i, B i < ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N),
∃ (f_lim : α → E), Memℒp f_lim p μ ∧
atTop.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)) :
CompleteSpace (Lp E p μ) := by
let B := fun n : ℕ => ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n
have hB_pos : ∀ n, 0 < B n := fun n => pow_pos (div_pos zero_lt_one zero_lt_two) n
refine Metric.complete_of_convergent_controlled_sequences B hB_pos fun f hf => ?_
rsuffices ⟨f_lim, hf_lim_meas, h_tendsto⟩ :
∃ (f_lim : α → E), Memℒp f_lim p μ ∧
atTop.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (⇑(f n) - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)
· exact ⟨hf_lim_meas.toLp f_lim, tendsto_Lp_of_tendsto_ℒp f_lim hf_lim_meas h_tendsto⟩
obtain ⟨M, hB⟩ : Summable B := summable_geometric_two
let B1 n := ENNReal.ofReal (B n)
have hB1_has : HasSum B1 (ENNReal.ofReal M) := by
have h_tsum_B1 : ∑' i, B1 i = ENNReal.ofReal M := by
change (∑' n : ℕ, ENNReal.ofReal (B n)) = ENNReal.ofReal M
rw [← hB.tsum_eq]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_tsum_of_nonneg (fun n => le_of_lt (hB_pos n)) hB.summable).symm
have h_sum := (@ENNReal.summable _ B1).hasSum
rwa [h_tsum_B1] at h_sum
have hB1 : ∑' i, B1 i < ∞ := by
rw [hB1_has.tsum_eq]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
let f1 : ℕ → α → E := fun n => f n
refine H f1 (fun n => Lp.memℒp (f n)) B1 hB1 fun N n m hn hm => ?_
specialize hf N n m hn hm
rw [dist_def] at hf
dsimp only [f1]
rwa [ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt]
rw [snorm_congr_ae (Lp.coeFn_sub _ _).symm]
exact Lp.snorm_ne_top _
#align measure_theory.Lp.complete_space_Lp_of_cauchy_complete_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.completeSpace_lp_of_cauchy_complete_ℒp
/-! ### Prove that controlled Cauchy sequences of `ℒp` have limits in `ℒp` -/
private theorem snorm'_sum_norm_sub_le_tsum_of_cauchy_snorm' {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(h_cau : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm' (f n - f m) p μ < B N) (n : ℕ) :
snorm' (fun x => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖) p μ ≤ ∑' i, B i := by
let f_norm_diff i x := ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖
have hgf_norm_diff :
∀ n,
(fun x => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), f_norm_diff i :=
fun n => funext fun x => by simp
rw [hgf_norm_diff]
refine (snorm'_sum_le (fun i _ => ((hf (i + 1)).sub (hf i)).norm) hp1).trans ?_
simp_rw [snorm'_norm]
refine (Finset.sum_le_sum ?_).trans (sum_le_tsum _ (fun m _ => zero_le _) ENNReal.summable)
exact fun m _ => (h_cau m (m + 1) m (Nat.le_succ m) (le_refl m)).le
private theorem lintegral_rpow_sum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_rpow_tsum
{f : ℕ → α → E} {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (n : ℕ)
(hn : snorm' (fun x => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖) p μ ≤ ∑' i, B i) :
(∫⁻ a, (∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ≤
(∑' i, B i) ^ p := by
have hp_pos : 0 < p := zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1
rw [← one_div_one_div p, @ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff _ _ (1 / p) (by simp [hp_pos]),
one_div_one_div p]
simp_rw [snorm'] at hn
have h_nnnorm_nonneg :
(fun a => (‖∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p) = fun a =>
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) ^ p := by
ext1 a
congr
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_sum_of_nonneg]
· rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg _]
exact Finset.sum_nonneg fun x _ => norm_nonneg _
· exact fun x _ => norm_nonneg _
change
(∫⁻ a, (fun x => ↑‖∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖‖₊ ^ p) a ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤
∑' i, B i at hn
rwa [h_nnnorm_nonneg] at hn
private theorem lintegral_rpow_tsum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_tsum {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) {p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞}
(h :
∀ n,
(∫⁻ a, (∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ≤
(∑' i, B i) ^ p) :
(∫⁻ a, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤ ∑' i, B i := by
have hp_pos : 0 < p := zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1
suffices h_pow : (∫⁻ a, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ≤ (∑' i, B i) ^ p by
rwa [← ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div]
have h_tsum_1 :
∀ g : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞, ∑' i, g i = atTop.liminf fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), g i := by
intro g
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_liminf_sum_nat, ← liminf_nat_add _ 1]
simp_rw [h_tsum_1 _]
rw [← h_tsum_1]
have h_liminf_pow :
(∫⁻ a, (atTop.liminf
fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) ^ p ∂μ) =
∫⁻ a, atTop.liminf
fun n => (∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) ^ p ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr fun x => ?_
have h_rpow_mono := ENNReal.strictMono_rpow_of_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1)
have h_rpow_surj := (ENNReal.rpow_left_bijective hp_pos.ne.symm).2
refine (h_rpow_mono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ h_rpow_surj).liminf_apply ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
all_goals isBoundedDefault
rw [h_liminf_pow]
refine (lintegral_liminf_le' ?_).trans ?_
· exact fun n =>
(Finset.aemeasurable_sum (Finset.range (n + 1)) fun i _ =>
((hf (i + 1)).sub (hf i)).ennnorm).pow_const
_
· exact liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (frequently_of_forall h)
private theorem tsum_nnnorm_sub_ae_lt_top {f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ)
{p : ℝ} (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i ≠ ∞)
(h : (∫⁻ a, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤ ∑' i, B i) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ := by
have hp_pos : 0 < p := zero_lt_one.trans_le hp1
have h_integral : (∫⁻ a, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) < ∞ := by
have h_tsum_lt_top : (∑' i, B i) ^ p < ∞ := ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg hp_pos.le hB
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ h_tsum_lt_top
rwa [← ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p), one_div_one_div] at h
have rpow_ae_lt_top : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p < ∞ := by
refine ae_lt_top' (AEMeasurable.pow_const ?_ _) h_integral.ne
exact AEMeasurable.ennreal_tsum fun n => ((hf (n + 1)).sub (hf n)).ennnorm
refine rpow_ae_lt_top.mono fun x hx => ?_
rwa [← ENNReal.lt_rpow_one_div_iff hp_pos,
ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos (by simp [hp_pos] : 0 < 1 / p)] at hx
theorem ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm' [CompleteSpace E] {f : ℕ → α → E} {p : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hp1 : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i ≠ ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm' (f n - f m) p μ < B N) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : E, atTop.Tendsto (fun n => f n x) (𝓝 l) := by
have h_summable : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Summable fun i : ℕ => f (i + 1) x - f i x := by
have h1 :
∀ n, snorm' (fun x => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖) p μ ≤ ∑' i, B i :=
snorm'_sum_norm_sub_le_tsum_of_cauchy_snorm' hf hp1 h_cau
have h2 :
∀ n,
(∫⁻ a, (∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ≤
(∑' i, B i) ^ p :=
fun n => lintegral_rpow_sum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_rpow_tsum hp1 n (h1 n)
have h3 : (∫⁻ a, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) a - f i a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤ ∑' i, B i :=
lintegral_rpow_tsum_coe_nnnorm_sub_le_tsum hf hp1 h2
have h4 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (∑' i, ‖f (i + 1) x - f i x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < ∞ :=
tsum_nnnorm_sub_ae_lt_top hf hp1 hB h3
exact h4.mono fun x hx => .of_nnnorm <| ENNReal.tsum_coe_ne_top_iff_summable.mp hx.ne
have h :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : E,
atTop.Tendsto (fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) (𝓝 l) := by
refine h_summable.mono fun x hx => ?_
let hx_sum := hx.hasSum.tendsto_sum_nat
exact ⟨∑' i, (f (i + 1) x - f i x), hx_sum⟩
refine h.mono fun x hx => ?_
cases' hx with l hx
have h_rw_sum :
(fun n => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, (f (i + 1) x - f i x)) = fun n => f n x - f 0 x := by
ext1 n
change
(∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, ((fun m => f m x) (i + 1) - (fun m => f m x) i)) = f n x - f 0 x
rw [Finset.sum_range_sub (fun m => f m x)]
rw [h_rw_sum] at hx
have hf_rw : (fun n => f n x) = fun n => f n x - f 0 x + f 0 x := by
ext1 n
abel
rw [hf_rw]
exact ⟨l + f 0 x, Tendsto.add_const _ hx⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm' MeasureTheory.Lp.ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm'
theorem ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm [CompleteSpace E] {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i ≠ ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ l : E, atTop.Tendsto (fun n => f n x) (𝓝 l) := by
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp_top] at *
have h_cau_ae : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ N n m, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → (‖(f n - f m) x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) < B N := by
simp_rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun N n m hnN hmN => ae_lt_of_essSup_lt (h_cau N n m hnN hmN)
simp_rw [snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup] at h_cau
refine h_cau_ae.mono fun x hx => cauchySeq_tendsto_of_complete ?_
refine cauchySeq_of_le_tendsto_0 (fun n => (B n).toReal) ?_ ?_
· intro n m N hnN hmN
specialize hx N n m hnN hmN
rw [_root_.dist_eq_norm, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg _),
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top (ENNReal.ne_top_of_tsum_ne_top hB N)]
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm] at hx
exact hx.le
· rw [← ENNReal.zero_toReal]
exact
Tendsto.comp (g := ENNReal.toReal) (ENNReal.tendsto_toReal ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
(ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hB)
have hp1 : 1 ≤ p.toReal := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_le_iff_le_toReal hp_top, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
exact hp
have h_cau' : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm' (f n - f m) p.toReal μ < B N := by
intro N n m hn hm
specialize h_cau N n m hn hm
rwa [snorm_eq_snorm' (zero_lt_one.trans_le hp).ne.symm hp_top] at h_cau
exact ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm' hf hp1 hB h_cau'
#align measure_theory.Lp.ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm MeasureTheory.Lp.ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm
theorem cauchy_tendsto_of_tendsto {f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ)
(f_lim : α → E) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i ≠ ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N)
(h_lim : ∀ᵐ x : α ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x))) :
atTop.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero]
intro ε hε
have h_B : ∃ N : ℕ, B N ≤ ε := by
suffices h_tendsto_zero : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, N ≤ n → B n ≤ ε from
⟨h_tendsto_zero.choose, h_tendsto_zero.choose_spec _ le_rfl⟩
exact (ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero.mp (ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_of_tsum_ne_top hB)) ε hε
cases' h_B with N h_B
refine ⟨N, fun n hn => ?_⟩
have h_sub : snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ ≤ atTop.liminf fun m => snorm (f n - f m) p μ := by
refine snorm_lim_le_liminf_snorm (fun m => (hf n).sub (hf m)) (f n - f_lim) ?_
refine h_lim.mono fun x hx => ?_
simp_rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact Tendsto.add tendsto_const_nhds (Tendsto.neg hx)
refine h_sub.trans ?_
refine liminf_le_of_frequently_le' (frequently_atTop.mpr ?_)
refine fun N1 => ⟨max N N1, le_max_right _ _, ?_⟩
exact (h_cau N n (max N N1) hn (le_max_left _ _)).le.trans h_B
#align measure_theory.Lp.cauchy_tendsto_of_tendsto MeasureTheory.Lp.cauchy_tendsto_of_tendsto
theorem memℒp_of_cauchy_tendsto (hp : 1 ≤ p) {f : ℕ → α → E} (hf : ∀ n, Memℒp (f n) p μ)
(f_lim : α → E) (h_lim_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable f_lim μ)
(h_tendsto : atTop.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0)) : Memℒp f_lim p μ := by
refine ⟨h_lim_meas, ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at h_tendsto
cases' h_tendsto 1 zero_lt_one with N h_tendsto_1
specialize h_tendsto_1 N (le_refl N)
have h_add : f_lim = f_lim - f N + f N := by abel
rw [h_add]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (snorm_add_le (h_lim_meas.sub (hf N).1) (hf N).1 hp) ?_
rw [ENNReal.add_lt_top]
constructor
· refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ ENNReal.one_lt_top
have h_neg : f_lim - f N = -(f N - f_lim) := by simp
rwa [h_neg, snorm_neg]
· exact (hf N).2
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_ℒp_of_cauchy_tendsto MeasureTheory.Lp.memℒp_of_cauchy_tendsto
theorem cauchy_complete_ℒp [CompleteSpace E] (hp : 1 ≤ p) {f : ℕ → α → E}
(hf : ∀ n, Memℒp (f n) p μ) {B : ℕ → ℝ≥0∞} (hB : ∑' i, B i ≠ ∞)
(h_cau : ∀ N n m : ℕ, N ≤ n → N ≤ m → snorm (f n - f m) p μ < B N) :
∃ (f_lim : α → E), Memℒp f_lim p μ ∧
atTop.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) := by
obtain ⟨f_lim, h_f_lim_meas, h_lim⟩ :
∃ f_lim : α → E, StronglyMeasurable f_lim ∧
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (f_lim x)) :=
exists_stronglyMeasurable_limit_of_tendsto_ae (fun n => (hf n).1)
(ae_tendsto_of_cauchy_snorm (fun n => (hf n).1) hp hB h_cau)
have h_tendsto' : atTop.Tendsto (fun n => snorm (f n - f_lim) p μ) (𝓝 0) :=
cauchy_tendsto_of_tendsto (fun m => (hf m).1) f_lim hB h_cau h_lim
have h_ℒp_lim : Memℒp f_lim p μ :=
memℒp_of_cauchy_tendsto hp hf f_lim h_f_lim_meas.aestronglyMeasurable h_tendsto'
exact ⟨f_lim, h_ℒp_lim, h_tendsto'⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp.cauchy_complete_ℒp MeasureTheory.Lp.cauchy_complete_ℒp
/-! ### `Lp` is complete for `1 ≤ p` -/
instance instCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace E] [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] : CompleteSpace (Lp E p μ) :=
completeSpace_lp_of_cauchy_complete_ℒp fun _f hf _B hB h_cau =>
cauchy_complete_ℒp hp.elim hf hB.ne h_cau
#align measure_theory.Lp.complete_space MeasureTheory.Lp.instCompleteSpace
end Lp
end MeasureTheory
end CompleteSpace
/-! ### Continuous functions in `Lp` -/
open scoped BoundedContinuousFunction
open BoundedContinuousFunction
section
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [BorelSpace α] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α E]
variable (E p μ)
/-- An additive subgroup of `Lp E p μ`, consisting of the equivalence classes which contain a
bounded continuous representative. -/
def MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction : AddSubgroup (Lp E p μ) :=
AddSubgroup.addSubgroupOf
((ContinuousMap.toAEEqFunAddHom μ).comp (toContinuousMapAddHom α E)).range (Lp E p μ)
#align measure_theory.Lp.bounded_continuous_function MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction
variable {E p μ}
/-- By definition, the elements of `Lp.boundedContinuousFunction E p μ` are the elements of
`Lp E p μ` which contain a bounded continuous representative. -/
theorem MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_boundedContinuousFunction_iff {f : Lp E p μ} :
f ∈ MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction E p μ ↔
∃ f₀ : α →ᵇ E, f₀.toContinuousMap.toAEEqFun μ = (f : α →ₘ[μ] E) :=
AddSubgroup.mem_addSubgroupOf
#align measure_theory.Lp.mem_bounded_continuous_function_iff MeasureTheory.Lp.mem_boundedContinuousFunction_iff
namespace BoundedContinuousFunction
variable [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
/-- A bounded continuous function on a finite-measure space is in `Lp`. -/
theorem mem_Lp (f : α →ᵇ E) : f.toContinuousMap.toAEEqFun μ ∈ Lp E p μ := by
refine Lp.mem_Lp_of_ae_bound ‖f‖ ?_
filter_upwards [f.toContinuousMap.coeFn_toAEEqFun μ] with x _
convert f.norm_coe_le_norm x using 2
#align bounded_continuous_function.mem_Lp BoundedContinuousFunction.mem_Lp
/-- The `Lp`-norm of a bounded continuous function is at most a constant (depending on the measure
of the whole space) times its sup-norm. -/
theorem Lp_nnnorm_le (f : α →ᵇ E) :
‖(⟨f.toContinuousMap.toAEEqFun μ, mem_Lp f⟩ : Lp E p μ)‖₊ ≤
measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * ‖f‖₊ := by
apply Lp.nnnorm_le_of_ae_bound
refine (f.toContinuousMap.coeFn_toAEEqFun μ).mono ?_
intro x hx
rw [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm, coe_nnnorm]
convert f.norm_coe_le_norm x using 2
#align bounded_continuous_function.Lp_nnnorm_le BoundedContinuousFunction.Lp_nnnorm_le
/-- The `Lp`-norm of a bounded continuous function is at most a constant (depending on the measure
of the whole space) times its sup-norm. -/
theorem Lp_norm_le (f : α →ᵇ E) :
‖(⟨f.toContinuousMap.toAEEqFun μ, mem_Lp f⟩ : Lp E p μ)‖ ≤
measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * ‖f‖ :=
Lp_nnnorm_le f
#align bounded_continuous_function.Lp_norm_le BoundedContinuousFunction.Lp_norm_le
variable (p μ)
/-- The normed group homomorphism of considering a bounded continuous function on a finite-measure
space as an element of `Lp`. -/
def toLpHom [Fact (1 ≤ p)] : NormedAddGroupHom (α →ᵇ E) (Lp E p μ) :=
{ AddMonoidHom.codRestrict ((ContinuousMap.toAEEqFunAddHom μ).comp (toContinuousMapAddHom α E))
(Lp E p μ) mem_Lp with
bound' := ⟨_, Lp_norm_le⟩ }
#align bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp_hom BoundedContinuousFunction.toLpHom
theorem range_toLpHom [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
((toLpHom p μ).range : AddSubgroup (Lp E p μ)) =
MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction E p μ := by
symm
convert AddMonoidHom.addSubgroupOf_range_eq_of_le
((ContinuousMap.toAEEqFunAddHom μ).comp (toContinuousMapAddHom α E))
(by rintro - ⟨f, rfl⟩; exact mem_Lp f : _ ≤ Lp E p μ)
#align bounded_continuous_function.range_to_Lp_hom BoundedContinuousFunction.range_toLpHom
variable (𝕜 : Type*) [Fact (1 ≤ p)]
/-- The bounded linear map of considering a bounded continuous function on a finite-measure space
as an element of `Lp`. -/
def toLp [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
(LinearMap.codRestrict (Lp.LpSubmodule E p μ 𝕜)
((ContinuousMap.toAEEqFunLinearMap μ).comp (toContinuousMapLinearMap α E 𝕜)) mem_Lp)
_ Lp_norm_le
#align bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp
theorem coeFn_toLp [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (f : α →ᵇ E) :
toLp (E := E) p μ 𝕜 f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
AEEqFun.coeFn_mk f _
#align bounded_continuous_function.coe_fn_to_Lp BoundedContinuousFunction.coeFn_toLp
variable {𝕜}
theorem range_toLp [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
(LinearMap.range (toLp p μ 𝕜 : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)).toAddSubgroup =
MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction E p μ :=
range_toLpHom p μ
#align bounded_continuous_function.range_to_Lp BoundedContinuousFunction.range_toLp
variable {p}
theorem toLp_norm_le [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
‖(toLp p μ 𝕜 : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)‖ ≤ measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (measureUnivNNReal μ ^ p.toReal⁻¹).coe_nonneg _
#align bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp_norm_le BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp_norm_le
theorem toLp_inj {f g : α →ᵇ E} [μ.IsOpenPosMeasure] [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
toLp (E := E) p μ 𝕜 f = toLp (E := E) p μ 𝕜 g ↔ f = g := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, by tauto⟩
rw [← DFunLike.coe_fn_eq, ← (map_continuous f).ae_eq_iff_eq μ (map_continuous g)]
refine (coeFn_toLp p μ 𝕜 f).symm.trans (EventuallyEq.trans ?_ <| coeFn_toLp p μ 𝕜 g)
rw [h]
#align bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp_inj BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp_inj
theorem toLp_injective [μ.IsOpenPosMeasure] [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
Function.Injective (⇑(toLp p μ 𝕜 : (α →ᵇ E) →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)) :=
fun _f _g hfg => (toLp_inj μ).mp hfg
#align bounded_continuous_function.to_Lp_injective BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp_injective
end BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace ContinuousMap
variable [CompactSpace α] [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
variable (𝕜 : Type*) (p μ) [Fact (1 ≤ p)]
/-- The bounded linear map of considering a continuous function on a compact finite-measure
space `α` as an element of `Lp`. By definition, the norm on `C(α, E)` is the sup-norm, transferred
from the space `α →ᵇ E` of bounded continuous functions, so this construction is just a matter of
transferring the structure from `BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp` along the isometry. -/
def toLp [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : C(α, E) →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ :=
(BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp p μ 𝕜).comp
(linearIsometryBoundedOfCompact α E 𝕜).toLinearIsometry.toContinuousLinearMap
#align continuous_map.to_Lp ContinuousMap.toLp
variable {𝕜}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSpace.lean | 1,871 | 1,878 | theorem range_toLp [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] :
(LinearMap.range (toLp p μ 𝕜 : C(α, E) →L[𝕜] Lp E p μ)).toAddSubgroup =
MeasureTheory.Lp.boundedContinuousFunction E p μ := by |
refine SetLike.ext' ?_
have := (linearIsometryBoundedOfCompact α E 𝕜).surjective
convert Function.Surjective.range_comp this (BoundedContinuousFunction.toLp (E := E) p μ 𝕜)
rw [← BoundedContinuousFunction.range_toLp p μ (𝕜 := 𝕜), Submodule.coe_toAddSubgroup,
LinearMap.range_coe]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Adrian Wüthrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adrian Wüthrich
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
/-!
# Laplacian Matrix
This module defines the Laplacian matrix of a graph, and proves some of its elementary properties.
## Main definitions & Results
* `SimpleGraph.degMatrix`: The degree matrix of a simple graph
* `SimpleGraph.lapMatrix`: The Laplacian matrix of a simple graph, defined as the difference
between the degree matrix and the adjacency matrix.
* `isPosSemidef_lapMatrix`: The Laplacian matrix is positive semidefinite.
* `rank_ker_lapMatrix_eq_card_ConnectedComponent`: The number of connected components in `G` is
the dimension of the nullspace of its Laplacian matrix.
-/
open Finset Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (R : Type*)
variable [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
/-- The diagonal matrix consisting of the degrees of the vertices in the graph. -/
def degMatrix [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Matrix V V R := Matrix.diagonal (G.degree ·)
/-- The *Laplacian matrix* `lapMatrix G R` of a graph `G`
is the matrix `L = D - A` where `D` is the degree and `A` the adjacency matrix of `G`. -/
def lapMatrix [AddGroupWithOne R] : Matrix V V R := G.degMatrix R - G.adjMatrix R
variable {R}
theorem isSymm_degMatrix [AddMonoidWithOne R] : (G.degMatrix R).IsSymm :=
isSymm_diagonal _
theorem isSymm_lapMatrix [AddGroupWithOne R] : (G.lapMatrix R).IsSymm :=
(isSymm_degMatrix _).sub (isSymm_adjMatrix _)
theorem degMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring R] (v : V) (vec : V → R) :
(G.degMatrix R *ᵥ vec) v = G.degree v * vec v := by
rw [degMatrix, mulVec_diagonal]
theorem lapMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocRing R] (v : V) (vec : V → R) :
(G.lapMatrix R *ᵥ vec) v = G.degree v * vec v - ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp_rw [lapMatrix, sub_mulVec, Pi.sub_apply, degMatrix_mulVec_apply, adjMatrix_mulVec_apply]
theorem lapMatrix_mulVec_const_eq_zero [Ring R] : mulVec (G.lapMatrix R) (fun _ ↦ 1) = 0 := by
ext1 i
rw [lapMatrix_mulVec_apply]
simp
theorem dotProduct_mulVec_degMatrix [CommRing R] (x : V → R) :
x ⬝ᵥ (G.degMatrix R *ᵥ x) = ∑ i : V, G.degree i * x i * x i := by
simp only [dotProduct, degMatrix, mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm]
variable (R)
theorem degree_eq_sum_if_adj [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (i : V) :
(G.degree i : R) = ∑ j : V, if G.Adj i j then 1 else 0 := by
unfold degree neighborFinset neighborSet
rw [sum_boole, Set.toFinset_setOf]
/-- Let $L$ be the graph Laplacian and let $x \in \mathbb{R}$, then
$$x^{\top} L x = \sum_{i \sim j} (x_{i}-x_{j})^{2}$$,
where $\sim$ denotes the adjacency relation -/
theorem lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂' [Field R] [CharZero R] (x : V → R) :
toLinearMap₂' (G.lapMatrix R) x x =
(∑ i : V, ∑ j : V, if G.Adj i j then (x i - x j)^2 else 0) / 2 := by
simp_rw [toLinearMap₂'_apply', lapMatrix, sub_mulVec, dotProduct_sub, dotProduct_mulVec_degMatrix,
dotProduct_mulVec_adjMatrix, ← sum_sub_distrib, degree_eq_sum_if_adj, sum_mul, ite_mul, one_mul,
zero_mul, ← sum_sub_distrib, ite_sub_ite, sub_zero]
rw [← half_add_self (∑ x_1 : V, ∑ x_2 : V, _)]
conv_lhs => enter [1,2,2,i,2,j]; rw [if_congr (adj_comm G i j) rfl rfl]
conv_lhs => enter [1,2]; rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [← sum_add_distrib, ite_add_ite]
congr 2 with i
congr 2 with j
ring_nf
/-- The Laplacian matrix is positive semidefinite -/
theorem posSemidef_lapMatrix [LinearOrderedField R] [StarRing R] [StarOrderedRing R]
[TrivialStar R] : PosSemidef (G.lapMatrix R) := by
constructor
· rw [IsHermitian, conjTranspose_eq_transpose_of_trivial, isSymm_lapMatrix]
· intro x
rw [star_trivial, ← toLinearMap₂'_apply', lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂']
positivity
theorem lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj [LinearOrderedField R] (x : V → R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' (G.lapMatrix R) x x = 0 ↔ ∀ i j : V, G.Adj i j → x i = x j := by
simp (disch := intros; positivity)
[lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂', sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, sub_eq_zero]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/LapMatrix.lean | 103 | 106 | theorem lapMatrix_toLin'_apply_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj (x : V → ℝ) :
Matrix.toLin' (G.lapMatrix ℝ) x = 0 ↔ ∀ i j : V, G.Adj i j → x i = x j := by |
rw [← (posSemidef_lapMatrix ℝ G).toLinearMap₂'_zero_iff, star_trivial,
lapMatrix_toLinearMap₂'_apply'_eq_zero_iff_forall_adj]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
#align_import data.pnat.xgcd from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6afc9b06856ad973f6a2619e3e8a0a8d537a58f2"
/-!
# Euclidean algorithm for ℕ
This file sets up a version of the Euclidean algorithm that only works with natural numbers.
Given `0 < a, b`, it computes the unique `(w, x, y, z, d)` such that the following identities hold:
* `a = (w + x) d`
* `b = (y + z) d`
* `w * z = x * y + 1`
`d` is then the gcd of `a` and `b`, and `a' := a / d = w + x` and `b' := b / d = y + z` are coprime.
This story is closely related to the structure of SL₂(ℕ) (as a free monoid on two generators) and
the theory of continued fractions.
## Main declarations
* `XgcdType`: Helper type in defining the gcd. Encapsulates `(wp, x, y, zp, ap, bp)`. where `wp`
`zp`, `ap`, `bp` are the variables getting changed through the algorithm.
* `IsSpecial`: States `wp * zp = x * y + 1`
* `IsReduced`: States `ap = a ∧ bp = b`
## Notes
See `Nat.Xgcd` for a very similar algorithm allowing values in `ℤ`.
-/
open Nat
namespace PNat
/-- A term of `XgcdType` is a system of six naturals. They should
be thought of as representing the matrix
[[w, x], [y, z]] = [[wp + 1, x], [y, zp + 1]]
together with the vector [a, b] = [ap + 1, bp + 1].
-/
structure XgcdType where
/-- `wp` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
wp : ℕ
/-- `x` satisfies `a / d = w + x` at the final step. -/
x : ℕ
/-- `y` satisfies `b / d = z + y` at the final step. -/
y : ℕ
/-- `zp` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
zp : ℕ
/-- `ap` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
ap : ℕ
/-- `bp` is a variable which changes through the algorithm. -/
bp : ℕ
deriving Inhabited
#align pnat.xgcd_type PNat.XgcdType
namespace XgcdType
variable (u : XgcdType)
instance : SizeOf XgcdType :=
⟨fun u => u.bp⟩
/-- The `Repr` instance converts terms to strings in a way that
reflects the matrix/vector interpretation as above. -/
instance : Repr XgcdType where
reprPrec
| g, _ => s!"[[[{repr (g.wp + 1)}, {repr g.x}], \
[{repr g.y}, {repr (g.zp + 1)}]], \
[{repr (g.ap + 1)}, {repr (g.bp + 1)}]]"
/-- Another `mk` using ℕ and ℕ+ -/
def mk' (w : ℕ+) (x : ℕ) (y : ℕ) (z : ℕ+) (a : ℕ+) (b : ℕ+) : XgcdType :=
mk w.val.pred x y z.val.pred a.val.pred b.val.pred
#align pnat.xgcd_type.mk' PNat.XgcdType.mk'
/-- `w = wp + 1` -/
def w : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.wp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.w PNat.XgcdType.w
/-- `z = zp + 1` -/
def z : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.zp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.z PNat.XgcdType.z
/-- `a = ap + 1` -/
def a : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.ap
#align pnat.xgcd_type.a PNat.XgcdType.a
/-- `b = bp + 1` -/
def b : ℕ+ :=
succPNat u.bp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.b PNat.XgcdType.b
/-- `r = a % b`: remainder -/
def r : ℕ :=
(u.ap + 1) % (u.bp + 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.r PNat.XgcdType.r
/-- `q = ap / bp`: quotient -/
def q : ℕ :=
(u.ap + 1) / (u.bp + 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.q PNat.XgcdType.q
/-- `qp = q - 1` -/
def qp : ℕ :=
u.q - 1
#align pnat.xgcd_type.qp PNat.XgcdType.qp
/-- The map `v` gives the product of the matrix
[[w, x], [y, z]] = [[wp + 1, x], [y, zp + 1]]
and the vector [a, b] = [ap + 1, bp + 1]. The map
`vp` gives [sp, tp] such that v = [sp + 1, tp + 1].
-/
def vp : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨u.wp + u.x + u.ap + u.wp * u.ap + u.x * u.bp, u.y + u.zp + u.bp + u.y * u.ap + u.zp * u.bp⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.vp PNat.XgcdType.vp
/-- `v = [sp + 1, tp + 1]`, check `vp` -/
def v : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b, u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.v PNat.XgcdType.v
/-- `succ₂ [t.1, t.2] = [t.1.succ, t.2.succ]` -/
def succ₂ (t : ℕ × ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
⟨t.1.succ, t.2.succ⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.succ₂ PNat.XgcdType.succ₂
theorem v_eq_succ_vp : u.v = succ₂ u.vp := by
ext <;> dsimp [v, vp, w, z, a, b, succ₂] <;> ring_nf
#align pnat.xgcd_type.v_eq_succ_vp PNat.XgcdType.v_eq_succ_vp
/-- `IsSpecial` holds if the matrix has determinant one. -/
def IsSpecial : Prop :=
u.wp + u.zp + u.wp * u.zp = u.x * u.y
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_special PNat.XgcdType.IsSpecial
/-- `IsSpecial'` is an alternative of `IsSpecial`. -/
def IsSpecial' : Prop :=
u.w * u.z = succPNat (u.x * u.y)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_special' PNat.XgcdType.IsSpecial'
theorem isSpecial_iff : u.IsSpecial ↔ u.IsSpecial' := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, IsSpecial']
let ⟨wp, x, y, zp, ap, bp⟩ := u
constructor <;> intro h <;> simp [w, z, succPNat] at * <;>
simp only [← coe_inj, mul_coe, mk_coe] at *
· simp_all [← h, Nat.mul, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]; ring
· simp [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_mul, ← Nat.add_assoc] at h; rw [← h]; ring
-- Porting note: Old code has been removed as it was much more longer.
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_special_iff PNat.XgcdType.isSpecial_iff
/-- `IsReduced` holds if the two entries in the vector are the
same. The reduction algorithm will produce a system with this
property, whose product vector is the same as for the original
system. -/
def IsReduced : Prop :=
u.ap = u.bp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_reduced PNat.XgcdType.IsReduced
/-- `IsReduced'` is an alternative of `IsReduced`. -/
def IsReduced' : Prop :=
u.a = u.b
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_reduced' PNat.XgcdType.IsReduced'
theorem isReduced_iff : u.IsReduced ↔ u.IsReduced' :=
succPNat_inj.symm
#align pnat.xgcd_type.is_reduced_iff PNat.XgcdType.isReduced_iff
/-- `flip` flips the placement of variables during the algorithm. -/
def flip : XgcdType where
wp := u.zp
x := u.y
y := u.x
zp := u.wp
ap := u.bp
bp := u.ap
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip PNat.XgcdType.flip
@[simp]
theorem flip_w : (flip u).w = u.z :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_w PNat.XgcdType.flip_w
@[simp]
theorem flip_x : (flip u).x = u.y :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_x PNat.XgcdType.flip_x
@[simp]
theorem flip_y : (flip u).y = u.x :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_y PNat.XgcdType.flip_y
@[simp]
theorem flip_z : (flip u).z = u.w :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_z PNat.XgcdType.flip_z
@[simp]
theorem flip_a : (flip u).a = u.b :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_a PNat.XgcdType.flip_a
@[simp]
theorem flip_b : (flip u).b = u.a :=
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_b PNat.XgcdType.flip_b
theorem flip_isReduced : (flip u).IsReduced ↔ u.IsReduced := by
dsimp [IsReduced, flip]
constructor <;> intro h <;> exact h.symm
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_is_reduced PNat.XgcdType.flip_isReduced
theorem flip_isSpecial : (flip u).IsSpecial ↔ u.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, flip]
rw [mul_comm u.x, mul_comm u.zp, add_comm u.zp]
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_is_special PNat.XgcdType.flip_isSpecial
theorem flip_v : (flip u).v = u.v.swap := by
dsimp [v]
ext
· simp only
ring
· simp only
ring
#align pnat.xgcd_type.flip_v PNat.XgcdType.flip_v
/-- Properties of division with remainder for a / b. -/
theorem rq_eq : u.r + (u.bp + 1) * u.q = u.ap + 1 :=
Nat.mod_add_div (u.ap + 1) (u.bp + 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.rq_eq PNat.XgcdType.rq_eq
theorem qp_eq (hr : u.r = 0) : u.q = u.qp + 1 := by
by_cases hq : u.q = 0
· let h := u.rq_eq
rw [hr, hq, mul_zero, add_zero] at h
cases h
· exact (Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hq)).symm
#align pnat.xgcd_type.qp_eq PNat.XgcdType.qp_eq
/-- The following function provides the starting point for
our algorithm. We will apply an iterative reduction process
to it, which will produce a system satisfying IsReduced.
The gcd can be read off from this final system.
-/
def start (a b : ℕ+) : XgcdType :=
⟨0, 0, 0, 0, a - 1, b - 1⟩
#align pnat.xgcd_type.start PNat.XgcdType.start
theorem start_isSpecial (a b : ℕ+) : (start a b).IsSpecial := by
dsimp [start, IsSpecial]
#align pnat.xgcd_type.start_is_special PNat.XgcdType.start_isSpecial
theorem start_v (a b : ℕ+) : (start a b).v = ⟨a, b⟩ := by
dsimp [start, v, XgcdType.a, XgcdType.b, w, z]
rw [one_mul, one_mul, zero_mul, zero_mul]
have := a.pos
have := b.pos
congr <;> omega
#align pnat.xgcd_type.start_v PNat.XgcdType.start_v
/-- `finish` happens when the reducing process ends. -/
def finish : XgcdType :=
XgcdType.mk u.wp ((u.wp + 1) * u.qp + u.x) u.y (u.y * u.qp + u.zp) u.bp u.bp
#align pnat.xgcd_type.finish PNat.XgcdType.finish
theorem finish_isReduced : u.finish.IsReduced := by
dsimp [IsReduced]
rfl
#align pnat.xgcd_type.finish_is_reduced PNat.XgcdType.finish_isReduced
theorem finish_isSpecial (hs : u.IsSpecial) : u.finish.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, finish] at hs ⊢
rw [add_mul _ _ u.y, add_comm _ (u.x * u.y), ← hs]
ring
#align pnat.xgcd_type.finish_is_special PNat.XgcdType.finish_isSpecial
theorem finish_v (hr : u.r = 0) : u.finish.v = u.v := by
let ha : u.r + u.b * u.q = u.a := u.rq_eq
rw [hr, zero_add] at ha
ext
· change (u.wp + 1) * u.b + ((u.wp + 1) * u.qp + u.x) * u.b = u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b
have : u.wp + 1 = u.w := rfl
rw [this, ← ha, u.qp_eq hr]
ring
· change u.y * u.b + (u.y * u.qp + u.z) * u.b = u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b
rw [← ha, u.qp_eq hr]
ring
#align pnat.xgcd_type.finish_v PNat.XgcdType.finish_v
/-- This is the main reduction step, which is used when u.r ≠ 0, or
equivalently b does not divide a. -/
def step : XgcdType :=
XgcdType.mk (u.y * u.q + u.zp) u.y ((u.wp + 1) * u.q + u.x) u.wp u.bp (u.r - 1)
#align pnat.xgcd_type.step PNat.XgcdType.step
/-- We will apply the above step recursively. The following result
is used to ensure that the process terminates. -/
theorem step_wf (hr : u.r ≠ 0) : SizeOf.sizeOf u.step < SizeOf.sizeOf u := by
change u.r - 1 < u.bp
have h₀ : u.r - 1 + 1 = u.r := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hr)
have h₁ : u.r < u.bp + 1 := Nat.mod_lt (u.ap + 1) u.bp.succ_pos
rw [← h₀] at h₁
exact lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₁
#align pnat.xgcd_type.step_wf PNat.XgcdType.step_wf
theorem step_isSpecial (hs : u.IsSpecial) : u.step.IsSpecial := by
dsimp [IsSpecial, step] at hs ⊢
rw [mul_add, mul_comm u.y u.x, ← hs]
ring
#align pnat.xgcd_type.step_is_special PNat.XgcdType.step_isSpecial
/-- The reduction step does not change the product vector. -/
theorem step_v (hr : u.r ≠ 0) : u.step.v = u.v.swap := by
let ha : u.r + u.b * u.q = u.a := u.rq_eq
let hr : u.r - 1 + 1 = u.r := (add_comm _ 1).trans (add_tsub_cancel_of_le (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hr))
ext
· change ((u.y * u.q + u.z) * u.b + u.y * (u.r - 1 + 1) : ℕ) = u.y * u.a + u.z * u.b
rw [← ha, hr]
ring
· change ((u.w * u.q + u.x) * u.b + u.w * (u.r - 1 + 1) : ℕ) = u.w * u.a + u.x * u.b
rw [← ha, hr]
ring
#align pnat.xgcd_type.step_v PNat.XgcdType.step_v
-- Porting note: removed 'have' and added decreasing_by to avoid lint errors
/-- We can now define the full reduction function, which applies
step as long as possible, and then applies finish. Note that the
"have" statement puts a fact in the local context, and the
equation compiler uses this fact to help construct the full
definition in terms of well-founded recursion. The same fact
needs to be introduced in all the inductive proofs of properties
given below. -/
def reduce (u : XgcdType) : XgcdType :=
dite (u.r = 0) (fun _ => u.finish) fun _h =>
flip (reduce u.step)
decreasing_by apply u.step_wf _h
#align pnat.xgcd_type.reduce PNat.XgcdType.reduce
theorem reduce_a {u : XgcdType} (h : u.r = 0) : u.reduce = u.finish := by
rw [reduce]
exact if_pos h
#align pnat.xgcd_type.reduce_a PNat.XgcdType.reduce_a
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Xgcd.lean | 353 | 355 | theorem reduce_b {u : XgcdType} (h : u.r ≠ 0) : u.reduce = u.step.reduce.flip := by |
rw [reduce]
exact if_neg h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jan-David Salchow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jan-David Salchow, Sébastien Gouëzel, Jean Lo
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NNNorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Span
/-!
# Operator norm for maps on normed spaces
This file contains statements about operator norm for which it really matters that the
underlying space has a norm (rather than just a seminorm).
-/
suppress_compilation
open Bornology
open Filter hiding map_smul
open scoped Classical NNReal Topology Uniformity
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ E Eₗ F Fₗ G Gₗ 𝓕 : Type*}
section Normed
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
[NormedAddCommGroup Fₗ]
open Metric ContinuousLinearMap
section
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₂] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜₃]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜₂ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜₃ G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 Fₗ] (c : 𝕜)
{σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} (f g : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) (x y z : E)
namespace LinearMap
theorem bound_of_shell [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) {ε C : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) {c : 𝕜}
(hc : 1 < ‖c‖) (hf : ∀ x, ε / ‖c‖ ≤ ‖x‖ → ‖x‖ < ε → ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
exact SemilinearMapClass.bound_of_shell_semi_normed f ε_pos hc hf (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)
#align linear_map.bound_of_shell LinearMap.bound_of_shell
/-- `LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound'` is a version of this lemma over a field satisfying `RCLike`
that produces a concrete bound.
-/
theorem bound_of_ball_bound {r : ℝ} (r_pos : 0 < r) (c : ℝ) (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] Fₗ)
(h : ∀ z ∈ Metric.ball (0 : E) r, ‖f z‖ ≤ c) : ∃ C, ∀ z : E, ‖f z‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖ := by
cases' @NontriviallyNormedField.non_trivial 𝕜 _ with k hk
use c * (‖k‖ / r)
intro z
refine bound_of_shell _ r_pos hk (fun x hko hxo => ?_) _
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c := h _ (mem_ball_zero_iff.mpr hxo)
_ ≤ c * (‖x‖ * ‖k‖ / r) := le_mul_of_one_le_right ?_ ?_
_ = _ := by ring
· exact le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h 0 (by simp [r_pos]))
· rw [div_le_iff (zero_lt_one.trans hk)] at hko
exact (one_le_div r_pos).mpr hko
#align linear_map.bound_of_ball_bound LinearMap.bound_of_ball_bound
theorem antilipschitz_of_comap_nhds_le [h : RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F)
(hf : (𝓝 0).comap f ≤ 𝓝 0) : ∃ K, AntilipschitzWith K f := by
rcases ((nhds_basis_ball.comap _).le_basis_iff nhds_basis_ball).1 hf 1 one_pos with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
simp only [Set.subset_def, Set.mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff] at hε
lift ε to ℝ≥0 using ε0.le
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine ⟨ε⁻¹ * ‖c‖₊, AddMonoidHomClass.antilipschitz_of_bound f fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : f x = 0
· rw [← hx] at hf
obtain rfl : x = 0 := Specializes.eq (specializes_iff_pure.2 <|
((Filter.tendsto_pure_pure _ _).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)).le_comap.trans hf)
exact norm_zero.trans_le (mul_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))
have hc₀ : c ≠ 0 := norm_pos_iff.1 (one_pos.trans hc)
rw [← h.1] at hc
rcases rescale_to_shell_zpow hc ε0 hx with ⟨n, -, hlt, -, hle⟩
simp only [← map_zpow₀, h.1, ← map_smulₛₗ] at hlt hle
calc
‖x‖ = ‖c ^ n‖⁻¹ * ‖c ^ n • x‖ := by
rwa [← norm_inv, ← norm_smul, inv_smul_smul₀ (zpow_ne_zero _ _)]
_ ≤ ‖c ^ n‖⁻¹ * 1 := (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hε _ hlt).le (inv_nonneg.2 (norm_nonneg _)))
_ ≤ ε⁻¹ * ‖c‖ * ‖f x‖ := by rwa [mul_one]
#align linear_map.antilipschitz_of_comap_nhds_le LinearMap.antilipschitz_of_comap_nhds_le
end LinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
section OpNorm
open Set Real
/-- An operator is zero iff its norm vanishes. -/
theorem opNorm_zero_iff [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] : ‖f‖ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun hn => ContinuousLinearMap.ext fun x => norm_le_zero_iff.1
(calc
_ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ = _ := by rw [hn, zero_mul]))
(by
rintro rfl
exact opNorm_zero)
#align continuous_linear_map.op_norm_zero_iff ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm_zero_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_zero_iff := opNorm_zero_iff
/-- If a normed space is non-trivial, then the norm of the identity equals `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem norm_id [Nontrivial E] : ‖id 𝕜 E‖ = 1 := by
refine norm_id_of_nontrivial_seminorm ?_
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : E)
exact ⟨x, ne_of_gt (norm_pos_iff.2 hx)⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_id ContinuousLinearMap.norm_id
@[simp]
lemma nnnorm_id [Nontrivial E] : ‖id 𝕜 E‖₊ = 1 := NNReal.eq norm_id
instance normOneClass [Nontrivial E] : NormOneClass (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
⟨norm_id⟩
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_one_class ContinuousLinearMap.normOneClass
/-- Continuous linear maps themselves form a normed space with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance toNormedAddCommGroup [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] : NormedAddCommGroup (E →SL[σ₁₂] F) :=
NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation fun f => (opNorm_zero_iff f).mp
#align continuous_linear_map.to_normed_add_comm_group ContinuousLinearMap.toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Continuous linear maps form a normed ring with respect to the operator norm. -/
instance toNormedRing : NormedRing (E →L[𝕜] E) :=
{ ContinuousLinearMap.toNormedAddCommGroup, ContinuousLinearMap.toSemiNormedRing with }
#align continuous_linear_map.to_normed_ring ContinuousLinearMap.toNormedRing
variable {f}
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm/NormedSpace.lean | 140 | 146 | theorem homothety_norm [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂] [Nontrivial E] (f : E →SL[σ₁₂] F) {a : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = a * ‖x‖) : ‖f‖ = a := by |
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x : E, x ≠ 0 := exists_ne 0
rw [← norm_pos_iff] at hx
have ha : 0 ≤ a := by simpa only [hf, hx, mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right] using norm_nonneg (f x)
apply le_antisymm (f.opNorm_le_bound ha fun y => le_of_eq (hf y))
simpa only [hf, hx, mul_le_mul_right] using f.le_opNorm x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Trim
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
#align_import measure_theory.measure.ae_measurable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3310acfa9787aa171db6d4cba3945f6f275fe9f2"
/-!
# Almost everywhere measurable functions
A function is almost everywhere measurable if it coincides almost everywhere with a measurable
function. This property, called `AEMeasurable f μ`, is defined in the file `MeasureSpaceDef`.
We discuss several of its properties that are analogous to properties of measurable functions.
-/
open scoped Classical
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Filter Set Function ENNReal
variable {ι α β γ δ R : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[MeasurableSpace δ] {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
section
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.aemeasurable [Subsingleton α] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
Subsingleton.measurable.aemeasurable
#align subsingleton.ae_measurable Subsingleton.aemeasurable
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
(measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f).aemeasurable
#align ae_measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain aemeasurable_of_subsingleton_codomain
@[simp, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_zero_measure : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) := by
nontriviality α; inhabit α
exact ⟨fun _ => f default, measurable_const, rfl⟩
#align ae_measurable_zero_measure aemeasurable_zero_measure
theorem aemeasurable_id'' (μ : Measure α) {m : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) :
@AEMeasurable α α m m0 id μ :=
@Measurable.aemeasurable α α m0 m id μ (measurable_id'' hm)
#align probability_theory.ae_measurable_id'' aemeasurable_id''
lemma aemeasurable_of_map_neZero {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → β} (h : NeZero (μ.map f)) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by
by_contra h'
simp [h'] at h
namespace AEMeasurable
lemma mono_ac (hf : AEMeasurable f ν) (hμν : μ ≪ ν) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, hμν.ae_le hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem mono_measure (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≤ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
mono_ac h h'.absolutelyContinuous
#align ae_measurable.mono_measure AEMeasurable.mono_measure
theorem mono_set {s t} (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict t)) :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
ht.mono_measure (restrict_mono h le_rfl)
#align ae_measurable.mono_set AEMeasurable.mono_set
protected theorem mono' (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≪ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, h' h.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align ae_measurable.mono' AEMeasurable.mono'
theorem ae_mem_imp_eq_mk {s} (h : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = h.mk f x :=
ae_imp_of_ae_restrict h.ae_eq_mk
#align ae_measurable.ae_mem_imp_eq_mk AEMeasurable.ae_mem_imp_eq_mk
theorem ae_inf_principal_eq_mk {s} (h : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) : f =ᶠ[ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s] h.mk f :=
le_ae_restrict h.ae_eq_mk
#align ae_measurable.ae_inf_principal_eq_mk AEMeasurable.ae_inf_principal_eq_mk
@[measurability]
theorem sum_measure [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} (h : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ i)) :
AEMeasurable f (sum μ) := by
nontriviality β
inhabit β
set s : ι → Set α := fun i => toMeasurable (μ i) { x | f x ≠ (h i).mk f x }
have hsμ : ∀ i, μ i (s i) = 0 := by
intro i
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact (h i).ae_eq_mk
have hsm : MeasurableSet (⋂ i, s i) :=
MeasurableSet.iInter fun i => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
have hs : ∀ i x, x ∉ s i → f x = (h i).mk f x := by
intro i x hx
contrapose! hx
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ hx
set g : α → β := (⋂ i, s i).piecewise (const α default) f
refine ⟨g, measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hsm ?_ ?_, ae_sum_iff.mpr fun i => ?_⟩
· rw [restrict_piecewise]
simp only [s, Set.restrict, const]
exact measurable_const
· rw [restrict_piecewise_compl, compl_iInter]
intro t ht
refine ⟨⋃ i, (h i).mk f ⁻¹' t ∩ (s i)ᶜ, MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i ↦
(measurable_mk _ ht).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.restrict, mem_inter_iff,
mem_compl_iff] at hx ⊢
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hxt, hxs⟩
rwa [hs _ _ hxs]
· rcases hx with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [hs _ _ hi]
exact fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩
· refine measure_mono_null (fun x (hx : f x ≠ g x) => ?_) (hsμ i)
contrapose! hx
refine (piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ ?_).symm
exact fun h => hx (mem_iInter.1 h i)
#align ae_measurable.sum_measure AEMeasurable.sum_measure
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} :
AEMeasurable f (sum μ) ↔ ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ i) :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono_measure (le_sum _ _), sum_measure⟩
#align ae_measurable_sum_measure_iff aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_add_measure_iff :
AEMeasurable f (μ + ν) ↔ AEMeasurable f μ ∧ AEMeasurable f ν := by
rw [← sum_cond, aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff, Bool.forall_bool, and_comm]
rfl
#align ae_measurable_add_measure_iff aemeasurable_add_measure_iff
@[measurability]
theorem add_measure {f : α → β} (hμ : AEMeasurable f μ) (hν : AEMeasurable f ν) :
AEMeasurable f (μ + ν) :=
aemeasurable_add_measure_iff.2 ⟨hμ, hν⟩
#align ae_measurable.add_measure AEMeasurable.add_measure
@[measurability]
protected theorem iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (s i))) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) :=
(sum_measure h).mono_measure <| restrict_iUnion_le
#align ae_measurable.Union AEMeasurable.iUnion
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (⋃ i, s i)) ↔ ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (s i)) :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono_measure <| restrict_mono (subset_iUnion _ _) le_rfl, AEMeasurable.iUnion⟩
#align ae_measurable_Union_iff aemeasurable_iUnion_iff
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_union_iff {s t : Set α} :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict (s ∪ t)) ↔
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) ∧ AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict t) := by
simp only [union_eq_iUnion, aemeasurable_iUnion_iff, Bool.forall_bool, cond, and_comm]
#align ae_measurable_union_iff aemeasurable_union_iff
@[measurability]
theorem smul_measure [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : R) : AEMeasurable f (c • μ) :=
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, ae_smul_measure h.ae_eq_mk c⟩
#align ae_measurable.smul_measure AEMeasurable.smul_measure
theorem comp_aemeasurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.map f))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ :=
⟨hg.mk g ∘ hf.mk f, hg.measurable_mk.comp hf.measurable_mk,
(ae_eq_comp hf hg.ae_eq_mk).trans (hf.ae_eq_mk.fun_comp (mk g hg))⟩
#align ae_measurable.comp_ae_measurable AEMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable
theorem comp_measurable {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (μ.map f))
(hf : Measurable f) : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ :=
hg.comp_aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable
#align ae_measurable.comp_measurable AEMeasurable.comp_measurable
theorem comp_quasiMeasurePreserving {ν : Measure δ} {f : α → δ} {g : δ → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g ν)
(hf : QuasiMeasurePreserving f μ ν) : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ :=
(hg.mono' hf.absolutelyContinuous).comp_measurable hf.measurable
#align ae_measurable.comp_quasi_measure_preserving AEMeasurable.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving
theorem map_map_of_aemeasurable {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : AEMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : (μ.map f).map g = μ.map (g ∘ f) := by
ext1 s hs
rw [map_apply_of_aemeasurable hg hs, map_apply₀ hf (hg.nullMeasurable hs),
map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hg.comp_aemeasurable hf) hs, preimage_comp]
#align ae_measurable.map_map_of_ae_measurable AEMeasurable.map_map_of_aemeasurable
@[measurability]
theorem prod_mk {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x, g x)) μ :=
⟨fun a => (hf.mk f a, hg.mk g a), hf.measurable_mk.prod_mk hg.measurable_mk,
EventuallyEq.prod_mk hf.ae_eq_mk hg.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align ae_measurable.prod_mk AEMeasurable.prod_mk
theorem exists_ae_eq_range_subset (H : AEMeasurable f μ) {t : Set β} (ht : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x ∈ t)
(h₀ : t.Nonempty) : ∃ g, Measurable g ∧ range g ⊆ t ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
let s : Set α := toMeasurable μ { x | f x = H.mk f x ∧ f x ∈ t }ᶜ
let g : α → β := piecewise s (fun _ => h₀.some) (H.mk f)
refine ⟨g, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact Measurable.piecewise (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) measurable_const H.measurable_mk
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [g, hx] using h₀.some_mem
· simp only [g, hx, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]
contrapose! hx
apply subset_toMeasurable
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [hx, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_and,
not_false_iff, imp_true_iff]
· have A : μ (toMeasurable μ { x | f x = H.mk f x ∧ f x ∈ t }ᶜ) = 0 := by
rw [measure_toMeasurable, ← compl_mem_ae_iff, compl_compl]
exact H.ae_eq_mk.and ht
filter_upwards [compl_mem_ae_iff.2 A] with x hx
rw [mem_compl_iff] at hx
simp only [g, hx, piecewise_eq_of_not_mem, not_false_iff]
contrapose! hx
apply subset_toMeasurable
simp only [hx, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ae_measurable.exists_ae_eq_range_subset AEMeasurable.exists_ae_eq_range_subset
theorem exists_measurable_nonneg {β} [Preorder β] [Zero β] {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (f_nn : ∀ᵐ t ∂μ, 0 ≤ f t) : ∃ g, Measurable g ∧ 0 ≤ g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
obtain ⟨G, hG_meas, hG_mem, hG_ae_eq⟩ := hf.exists_ae_eq_range_subset f_nn ⟨0, le_rfl⟩
exact ⟨G, hG_meas, fun x => hG_mem (mem_range_self x), hG_ae_eq⟩
#align ae_measurable.exists_measurable_nonneg AEMeasurable.exists_measurable_nonneg
theorem subtype_mk (h : AEMeasurable f μ) {s : Set β} {hfs : ∀ x, f x ∈ s} :
AEMeasurable (codRestrict f s hfs) μ := by
nontriviality α; inhabit α
obtain ⟨g, g_meas, hg, fg⟩ : ∃ g : α → β, Measurable g ∧ range g ⊆ s ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.exists_ae_eq_range_subset (eventually_of_forall hfs) ⟨_, hfs default⟩
refine ⟨codRestrict g s fun x => hg (mem_range_self _), Measurable.subtype_mk g_meas, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [fg] with x hx
simpa [Subtype.ext_iff]
#align ae_measurable.subtype_mk AEMeasurable.subtype_mk
end AEMeasurable
theorem aemeasurable_const' (h : ∀ᵐ (x) (y) ∂μ, f x = f y) : AEMeasurable f μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with (rfl | hμ)
· exact aemeasurable_zero_measure
· haveI := ae_neBot.2 hμ
rcases h.exists with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨const α (f x), measurable_const, EventuallyEq.symm hx⟩
#align ae_measurable_const' aemeasurable_const'
theorem aemeasurable_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {f : α → β} {a b : α} :
(AEMeasurable f <| μ.restrict <| Ι a b) ↔
(AEMeasurable f <| μ.restrict <| Ioc a b) ∧ (AEMeasurable f <| μ.restrict <| Ioc b a) := by
rw [uIoc_eq_union, aemeasurable_union_iff]
#align ae_measurable_uIoc_iff aemeasurable_uIoc_iff
theorem aemeasurable_iff_measurable [μ.IsComplete] : AEMeasurable f μ ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.nullMeasurable.measurable_of_complete, fun h => h.aemeasurable⟩
#align ae_measurable_iff_measurable aemeasurable_iff_measurable
theorem MeasurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_map_iff {g : β → γ} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) :
AEMeasurable g (μ.map f) ↔ AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.comp_measurable hf.measurable, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨g₁, hgm₁, heq⟩
rcases hf.exists_measurable_extend hgm₁ fun x => ⟨g x⟩ with ⟨g₂, hgm₂, rfl⟩
exact ⟨g₂, hgm₂, hf.ae_map_iff.2 heq⟩
#align measurable_embedding.ae_measurable_map_iff MeasurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_map_iff
theorem MeasurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_comp_iff {g : β → γ} (hg : MeasurableEmbedding g)
{μ : Measure α} : AEMeasurable (g ∘ f) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, hg.measurable.comp_aemeasurable⟩
suffices AEMeasurable ((rangeSplitting g ∘ rangeFactorization g) ∘ f) μ by
rwa [(rightInverse_rangeSplitting hg.injective).comp_eq_id] at this
exact hg.measurable_rangeSplitting.comp_aemeasurable H.subtype_mk
#align measurable_embedding.ae_measurable_comp_iff MeasurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_comp_iff
theorem aemeasurable_restrict_iff_comap_subtype {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → β} : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) ↔ AEMeasurable (f ∘ (↑) : s → β) (comap (↑) μ) := by
rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe hs, (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).aemeasurable_map_iff]
#align ae_measurable_restrict_iff_comap_subtype aemeasurable_restrict_iff_comap_subtype
@[to_additive] -- @[to_additive (attr := simp)] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem aemeasurable_one [One β] : AEMeasurable (fun _ : α => (1 : β)) μ :=
measurable_one.aemeasurable
#align ae_measurable_one aemeasurable_one
#align ae_measurable_zero aemeasurable_zero
@[simp]
theorem aemeasurable_smul_measure_iff {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
AEMeasurable f (c • μ) ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).1 h.ae_eq_mk⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, (ae_smul_measure_iff hc).2 h.ae_eq_mk⟩⟩
#align ae_measurable_smul_measure_iff aemeasurable_smul_measure_iff
theorem aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_trim {α} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f : α → β} (hf : AEMeasurable f (μ.trim hm)) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨hf.mk f, Measurable.mono hf.measurable_mk hm le_rfl, ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align ae_measurable_of_ae_measurable_trim aemeasurable_of_aemeasurable_trim
theorem aemeasurable_restrict_of_measurable_subtype {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : Measurable fun x : s => f x) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
(aemeasurable_restrict_iff_comap_subtype hs).2 hf.aemeasurable
#align ae_measurable_restrict_of_measurable_subtype aemeasurable_restrict_of_measurable_subtype
theorem aemeasurable_map_equiv_iff (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {f : β → γ} :
AEMeasurable f (μ.map e) ↔ AEMeasurable (f ∘ e) μ :=
e.measurableEmbedding.aemeasurable_map_iff
#align ae_measurable_map_equiv_iff aemeasurable_map_equiv_iff
end
theorem AEMeasurable.restrict (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) {s} : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
⟨AEMeasurable.mk f hfm, hfm.measurable_mk, ae_restrict_of_ae hfm.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align ae_measurable.restrict AEMeasurable.restrict
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/AEMeasurable.lean | 311 | 325 | theorem aemeasurable_Ioi_of_forall_Ioc {β} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [LinearOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] {x : α} {g : α → β}
(g_meas : ∀ t > x, AEMeasurable g (μ.restrict (Ioc x t))) :
AEMeasurable g (μ.restrict (Ioi x)) := by |
haveI : Nonempty α := ⟨x⟩
obtain ⟨u, hu_tendsto⟩ := exists_seq_tendsto (atTop : Filter α)
have Ioi_eq_iUnion : Ioi x = ⋃ n : ℕ, Ioc x (u n) := by
rw [iUnion_Ioc_eq_Ioi_self_iff.mpr _]
exact fun y _ => (hu_tendsto.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop y)).exists
rw [Ioi_eq_iUnion, aemeasurable_iUnion_iff]
intro n
cases' lt_or_le x (u n) with h h
· exact g_meas (u n) h
· rw [Ioc_eq_empty (not_lt.mpr h), Measure.restrict_empty]
exact aemeasurable_zero_measure
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
#align_import number_theory.ramification_inertia from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"039a089d2a4b93c761b234f3e5f5aeb752bac60f"
/-!
# Ramification index and inertia degree
Given `P : Ideal S` lying over `p : Ideal R` for the ring extension `f : R →+* S`
(assuming `P` and `p` are prime or maximal where needed),
the **ramification index** `Ideal.ramificationIdx f p P` is the multiplicity of `P` in `map f p`,
and the **inertia degree** `Ideal.inertiaDeg f p P` is the degree of the field extension
`(S / P) : (R / p)`.
## Main results
The main theorem `Ideal.sum_ramification_inertia` states that for all coprime `P` lying over `p`,
`Σ P, ramification_idx f p P * inertia_deg f p P` equals the degree of the field extension
`Frac(S) : Frac(R)`.
## Implementation notes
Often the above theory is set up in the case where:
* `R` is the ring of integers of a number field `K`,
* `L` is a finite separable extension of `K`,
* `S` is the integral closure of `R` in `L`,
* `p` and `P` are maximal ideals,
* `P` is an ideal lying over `p`
We will try to relax the above hypotheses as much as possible.
## Notation
In this file, `e` stands for the ramification index and `f` for the inertia degree of `P` over `p`,
leaving `p` and `P` implicit.
-/
namespace Ideal
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
variable {S : Type v} [CommRing S] (f : R →+* S)
variable (p : Ideal R) (P : Ideal S)
open FiniteDimensional
open UniqueFactorizationMonoid
section DecEq
open scoped Classical
/-- The ramification index of `P` over `p` is the largest exponent `n` such that
`p` is contained in `P^n`.
In particular, if `p` is not contained in `P^n`, then the ramification index is 0.
If there is no largest such `n` (e.g. because `p = ⊥`), then `ramificationIdx` is
defined to be 0.
-/
noncomputable def ramificationIdx : ℕ := sSup {n | map f p ≤ P ^ n}
#align ideal.ramification_idx Ideal.ramificationIdx
variable {f p P}
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_find (h : ∃ n, ∀ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ n) :
ramificationIdx f p P = Nat.find h :=
Nat.sSup_def h
#align ideal.ramification_idx_eq_find Ideal.ramificationIdx_eq_find
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_zero (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k ∧ n < k) :
ramificationIdx f p P = 0 :=
dif_neg (by push_neg; exact h)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_eq_zero Ideal.ramificationIdx_eq_zero
theorem ramificationIdx_spec {n : ℕ} (hle : map f p ≤ P ^ n) (hgt : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ (n + 1)) :
ramificationIdx f p P = n := by
let Q : ℕ → Prop := fun m => ∀ k : ℕ, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ m
have : Q n := by
intro k hk
refine le_of_not_lt fun hnk => ?_
exact hgt (hk.trans (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hnk))
rw [ramificationIdx_eq_find ⟨n, this⟩]
refine le_antisymm (Nat.find_min' _ this) (le_of_not_gt fun h : Nat.find _ < n => ?_)
obtain this' := Nat.find_spec ⟨n, this⟩
exact h.not_le (this' _ hle)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_spec Ideal.ramificationIdx_spec
theorem ramificationIdx_lt {n : ℕ} (hgt : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ n) : ramificationIdx f p P < n := by
cases' n with n n
· simp at hgt
· rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff]
have : ∀ k, map f p ≤ P ^ k → k ≤ n := by
refine fun k hk => le_of_not_lt fun hnk => ?_
exact hgt (hk.trans (Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hnk))
rw [ramificationIdx_eq_find ⟨n, this⟩]
exact Nat.find_min' ⟨n, this⟩ this
#align ideal.ramification_idx_lt Ideal.ramificationIdx_lt
@[simp]
theorem ramificationIdx_bot : ramificationIdx f ⊥ P = 0 :=
dif_neg <| not_exists.mpr fun n hn => n.lt_succ_self.not_le (hn _ (by simp))
#align ideal.ramification_idx_bot Ideal.ramificationIdx_bot
@[simp]
theorem ramificationIdx_of_not_le (h : ¬map f p ≤ P) : ramificationIdx f p P = 0 :=
ramificationIdx_spec (by simp) (by simpa using h)
#align ideal.ramification_idx_of_not_le Ideal.ramificationIdx_of_not_le
theorem ramificationIdx_ne_zero {e : ℕ} (he : e ≠ 0) (hle : map f p ≤ P ^ e)
(hnle : ¬map f p ≤ P ^ (e + 1)) : ramificationIdx f p P ≠ 0 := by
rwa [ramificationIdx_spec hle hnle]
#align ideal.ramification_idx_ne_zero Ideal.ramificationIdx_ne_zero
theorem le_pow_of_le_ramificationIdx {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ ramificationIdx f p P) :
map f p ≤ P ^ n := by
contrapose! hn
exact ramificationIdx_lt hn
#align ideal.le_pow_of_le_ramification_idx Ideal.le_pow_of_le_ramificationIdx
theorem le_pow_ramificationIdx : map f p ≤ P ^ ramificationIdx f p P :=
le_pow_of_le_ramificationIdx (le_refl _)
#align ideal.le_pow_ramification_idx Ideal.le_pow_ramificationIdx
theorem le_comap_pow_ramificationIdx : p ≤ comap f (P ^ ramificationIdx f p P) :=
map_le_iff_le_comap.mp le_pow_ramificationIdx
#align ideal.le_comap_pow_ramification_idx Ideal.le_comap_pow_ramificationIdx
theorem le_comap_of_ramificationIdx_ne_zero (h : ramificationIdx f p P ≠ 0) : p ≤ comap f P :=
Ideal.map_le_iff_le_comap.mp <| le_pow_ramificationIdx.trans <| Ideal.pow_le_self <| h
#align ideal.le_comap_of_ramification_idx_ne_zero Ideal.le_comap_of_ramificationIdx_ne_zero
namespace IsDedekindDomain
variable [IsDedekindDomain S]
theorem ramificationIdx_eq_normalizedFactors_count (hp0 : map f p ≠ ⊥) (hP : P.IsPrime)
(hP0 : P ≠ ⊥) : ramificationIdx f p P = (normalizedFactors (map f p)).count P := by
have hPirr := (Ideal.prime_of_isPrime hP0 hP).irreducible
refine ramificationIdx_spec (Ideal.le_of_dvd ?_) (mt Ideal.dvd_iff_le.mpr ?_) <;>
rw [dvd_iff_normalizedFactors_le_normalizedFactors (pow_ne_zero _ hP0) hp0,
normalizedFactors_pow, normalizedFactors_irreducible hPirr, normalize_eq,
Multiset.nsmul_singleton, ← Multiset.le_count_iff_replicate_le]
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le
#align ideal.is_dedekind_domain.ramification_idx_eq_normalized_factors_count Ideal.IsDedekindDomain.ramificationIdx_eq_normalizedFactors_count
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/RamificationInertia.lean | 153 | 156 | theorem ramificationIdx_eq_factors_count (hp0 : map f p ≠ ⊥) (hP : P.IsPrime) (hP0 : P ≠ ⊥) :
ramificationIdx f p P = (factors (map f p)).count P := by |
rw [IsDedekindDomain.ramificationIdx_eq_normalizedFactors_count hp0 hP hP0,
factors_eq_normalizedFactors]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
#align_import topology.metric_space.gluing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e1a7bdeb4fd826b7e71d130d34988f0a2d26a177"
/-!
# Metric space gluing
Gluing two metric spaces along a common subset. Formally, we are given
```
Φ
Z ---> X
|
|Ψ
v
Y
```
where `hΦ : Isometry Φ` and `hΨ : Isometry Ψ`.
We want to complete the square by a space `GlueSpacescan hΦ hΨ` and two isometries
`toGlueL hΦ hΨ` and `toGlueR hΦ hΨ` that make the square commute.
We start by defining a predistance on the disjoint union `X ⊕ Y`, for which
points `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance 0. The (quotient) metric space associated
to this predistance is the desired space.
This is an instance of a more general construction, where `Φ` and `Ψ` do not have to be isometries,
but the distances in the image almost coincide, up to `2ε` say. Then one can almost glue the two
spaces so that the images of a point under `Φ` and `Ψ` are `ε`-close. If `ε > 0`, this yields a
metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, without the need to take a quotient. In particular,
this gives a natural metric space structure on `X ⊕ Y`, where the basepoints
are at distance 1, say, and the distances between other points are obtained by going through the two
basepoints.
(We also register the same metric space structure on a general disjoint union `Σ i, E i`).
We also define the inductive limit of metric spaces. Given
```
f 0 f 1 f 2 f 3
X 0 -----> X 1 -----> X 2 -----> X 3 -----> ...
```
where the `X n` are metric spaces and `f n` isometric embeddings, we define the inductive
limit of the `X n`, also known as the increasing union of the `X n` in this context, if we
identify `X n` and `X (n+1)` through `f n`. This is a metric space in which all `X n` embed
isometrically and in a way compatible with `f n`.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
open Function Set Uniformity Topology
namespace Metric
section ApproxGluing
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y] {Φ : Z → X} {Ψ : Z → Y} {ε : ℝ}
/-- Define a predistance on `X ⊕ Y`, for which `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are at distance `ε` -/
def glueDist (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : Sum X Y → Sum X Y → ℝ
| .inl x, .inl y => dist x y
| .inr x, .inr y => dist x y
| .inl x, .inr y => (⨅ p, dist x (Φ p) + dist y (Ψ p)) + ε
| .inr x, .inl y => (⨅ p, dist y (Φ p) + dist x (Ψ p)) + ε
#align metric.glue_dist Metric.glueDist
private theorem glueDist_self (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) : ∀ x, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x x = 0
| .inl _ => dist_self _
| .inr _ => dist_self _
theorem glueDist_glued_points [Nonempty Z] (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (p : Z) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl (Φ p)) (.inr (Ψ p)) = ε := by
have : ⨅ q, dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) = 0 := by
have A : ∀ q, 0 ≤ dist (Φ p) (Φ q) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q) := fun _ =>
add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_ciInf A)
have : 0 = dist (Φ p) (Φ p) + dist (Ψ p) (Ψ p) := by simp
rw [this]
exact ciInf_le ⟨0, forall_mem_range.2 A⟩ p
simp only [glueDist, this, zero_add]
#align metric.glue_dist_glued_points Metric.glueDist_glued_points
private theorem glueDist_comm (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y = glueDist Φ Ψ ε y x
| .inl _, .inl _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inr _, .inr _ => dist_comm _ _
| .inl _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inl _ => rfl
theorem glueDist_swap (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) :
∀ x y, glueDist Ψ Φ ε x.swap y.swap = glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y
| .inl _, .inl _ => rfl
| .inr _, .inr _ => rfl
| .inl _, .inr _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
| .inr _, .inl _ => by simp only [glueDist, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr, dist_comm, add_comm]
theorem le_glueDist_inl_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left <| Real.iInf_nonneg fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
theorem le_glueDist_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x y) :
ε ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr x) (.inl y) := by
rw [glueDist_comm]; apply le_glueDist_inl_inr
variable [Nonempty Z]
private theorem glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (x : X) (y z : Y) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr z) ≤
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) + glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr y) (.inr z) := by
simp only [glueDist]
rw [add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right]
refine le_ciInf_add fun p => ciInf_le_of_le ⟨0, ?_⟩ p ?_
· exact forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => add_nonneg dist_nonneg dist_nonneg
· linarith [dist_triangle_left z (Ψ p) y]
private theorem glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) (x : X) (y : Y) (z : X) :
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inl z) ≤
glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inl x) (.inr y) + glueDist Φ Ψ ε (.inr y) (.inl z) := by
simp_rw [glueDist, add_add_add_comm _ ε, add_assoc]
refine le_ciInf_add fun p => ?_
rw [add_left_comm, add_assoc, ← two_mul]
refine le_ciInf_add fun q => ?_
rw [dist_comm z]
linarith [dist_triangle4 x (Φ p) (Φ q) z, dist_triangle_left (Ψ p) (Ψ q) y, (abs_le.1 (H p q)).2]
private theorem glueDist_triangle (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) :
∀ x y z, glueDist Φ Ψ ε x z ≤ glueDist Φ Ψ ε x y + glueDist Φ Ψ ε y z
| .inl x, .inl y, .inl z => dist_triangle _ _ _
| .inr x, .inr y, .inr z => dist_triangle _ _ _
| .inr x, .inl y, .inl z => by
simp only [← glueDist_swap Φ]
apply glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr
| .inr x, .inr y, .inl z => by
simpa only [glueDist_comm, add_comm] using glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr _ _ _ z y x
| .inl x, .inl y, .inr z => by
simpa only [← glueDist_swap Φ, glueDist_comm, add_comm, Sum.swap_inl, Sum.swap_inr]
using glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr Ψ Φ ε z y x
| .inl x, .inr y, .inr z => glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inr ..
| .inl x, .inr y, .inl z => glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl Φ Ψ ε H x y z
| .inr x, .inl y, .inr z => by
simp only [← glueDist_swap Φ]
apply glueDist_triangle_inl_inr_inl
simpa only [abs_sub_comm]
private theorem eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (ε0 : 0 < ε) :
∀ p q : Sum X Y, glueDist Φ Ψ ε p q = 0 → p = q
| .inl x, .inl y, h => by rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
| .inl x, .inr y, h => by exfalso; linarith [le_glueDist_inl_inr Φ Ψ ε x y]
| .inr x, .inl y, h => by exfalso; linarith [le_glueDist_inr_inl Φ Ψ ε x y]
| .inr x, .inr y, h => by rw [eq_of_dist_eq_zero h]
theorem Sum.mem_uniformity_iff_glueDist (hε : 0 < ε) (s : Set ((X ⊕ Y) × (X ⊕ Y))) :
s ∈ 𝓤 (X ⊕ Y) ↔ ∃ δ > 0, ∀ a b, glueDist Φ Ψ ε a b < δ → (a, b) ∈ s := by
simp only [Sum.uniformity, Filter.mem_sup, Filter.mem_map, mem_uniformity_dist, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨δX, δX0, hX⟩, δY, δY0, hY⟩
refine ⟨min (min δX δY) ε, lt_min (lt_min δX0 δY0) hε, ?_⟩
rintro (a | a) (b | b) h <;> simp only [lt_min_iff] at h
· exact hX h.1.1
· exact absurd h.2 (le_glueDist_inl_inr _ _ _ _ _).not_lt
· exact absurd h.2 (le_glueDist_inr_inl _ _ _ _ _).not_lt
· exact hY h.1.2
· rintro ⟨ε, ε0, H⟩
constructor <;> exact ⟨ε, ε0, fun h => H _ _ h⟩
/-- Given two maps `Φ` and `Ψ` intro metric spaces `X` and `Y` such that the distances between
`Φ p` and `Φ q`, and between `Ψ p` and `Ψ q`, coincide up to `2 ε` where `ε > 0`, one can almost
glue the two spaces `X` and `Y` along the images of `Φ` and `Ψ`, so that `Φ p` and `Ψ p` are
at distance `ε`. -/
def glueMetricApprox (Φ : Z → X) (Ψ : Z → Y) (ε : ℝ) (ε0 : 0 < ε)
(H : ∀ p q, |dist (Φ p) (Φ q) - dist (Ψ p) (Ψ q)| ≤ 2 * ε) : MetricSpace (X ⊕ Y) where
dist := glueDist Φ Ψ ε
dist_self := glueDist_self Φ Ψ ε
dist_comm := glueDist_comm Φ Ψ ε
dist_triangle := glueDist_triangle Φ Ψ ε H
edist_dist _ _ := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_glueDist_eq_zero Φ Ψ ε ε0 _ _
toUniformSpace := Sum.instUniformSpace
uniformity_dist := uniformity_dist_of_mem_uniformity _ _ <| Sum.mem_uniformity_iff_glueDist ε0
#align metric.glue_metric_approx Metric.glueMetricApprox
end ApproxGluing
section Sum
/-!
### Metric on `X ⊕ Y`
A particular case of the previous construction is when one uses basepoints in `X` and `Y` and one
glues only along the basepoints, putting them at distance 1. We give a direct definition of
the distance, without `iInf`, as it is easier to use in applications, and show that it is equal to
the gluing distance defined above to take advantage of the lemmas we have already proved.
-/
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z : Type w}
variable [MetricSpace X] [MetricSpace Y]
/-- Distance on a disjoint union. There are many (noncanonical) ways to put a distance compatible
with each factor.
If the two spaces are bounded, one can say for instance that each point in the first is at distance
`diam X + diam Y + 1` of each point in the second.
Instead, we choose a construction that works for unbounded spaces, but requires basepoints,
chosen arbitrarily.
We embed isometrically each factor, set the basepoints at distance 1,
arbitrarily, and say that the distance from `a` to `b` is the sum of the distances of `a` and `b` to
their respective basepoints, plus the distance 1 between the basepoints.
Since there is an arbitrary choice in this construction, it is not an instance by default. -/
protected def Sum.dist : Sum X Y → Sum X Y → ℝ
| .inl a, .inl a' => dist a a'
| .inr b, .inr b' => dist b b'
| .inl a, .inr b => dist a (Nonempty.some ⟨a⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨b⟩) b
| .inr b, .inl a => dist b (Nonempty.some ⟨b⟩) + 1 + dist (Nonempty.some ⟨a⟩) a
#align metric.sum.dist Metric.Sum.dist
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Gluing.lean | 221 | 225 | theorem Sum.dist_eq_glueDist {p q : X ⊕ Y} (x : X) (y : Y) :
Sum.dist p q =
glueDist (fun _ : Unit => Nonempty.some ⟨x⟩) (fun _ : Unit => Nonempty.some ⟨y⟩) 1 p q := by |
cases p <;> cases q <;> first |rfl|simp [Sum.dist, glueDist, dist_comm, add_comm,
add_left_comm, add_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Simon Hudon, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Aesop
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Cases
import Mathlib.Tactic.SimpRw
import Mathlib.Tactic.SplitIfs
#align_import algebra.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a07d750983b94c530ab69a726862c2ab6802b38c"
/-!
# Basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups
This file lists various basic lemmas about semigroups, monoids, and groups. Most proofs are
one-liners from the corresponding axioms. For the definitions of semigroups, monoids and groups, see
`Algebra/Group/Defs.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u
variable {α β G M : Type*}
section ite
variable [Pow α β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) dite_smul]
lemma pow_dite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b : p → β) (c : ¬ p → β) :
a ^ (if h : p then b h else c h) = if h : p then a ^ b h else a ^ c h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_dite]
lemma dite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : p → α) (b : ¬ p → α) (c : β) :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ^ c = if h : p then a h ^ c else b h ^ c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ite_smul]
lemma pow_ite (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a : α) (b c : β) :
a ^ (if p then b else c) = if p then a ^ b else a ^ c := pow_dite _ _ _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) smul_ite]
lemma ite_pow (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(if p then a else b) ^ c = if p then a ^ c else b ^ c := dite_pow _ _ _ _
set_option linter.existingAttributeWarning false in
attribute [to_additive (attr := simp)] dite_smul smul_dite ite_smul smul_ite
end ite
section IsLeftCancelMul
variable [Mul G] [IsLeftCancelMul G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_injective (a : G) : Injective (a * ·) := fun _ _ ↦ mul_left_cancel
#align mul_right_injective mul_right_injective
#align add_right_injective add_right_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_right_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_right_injective a).eq_iff
#align mul_right_inj mul_right_inj
#align add_right_inj add_right_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_mul_right (a : G) {b c : G} : a * b ≠ a * c ↔ b ≠ c :=
(mul_right_injective a).ne_iff
#align mul_ne_mul_right mul_ne_mul_right
#align add_ne_add_right add_ne_add_right
end IsLeftCancelMul
section IsRightCancelMul
variable [Mul G] [IsRightCancelMul G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_injective (a : G) : Function.Injective (· * a) := fun _ _ ↦ mul_right_cancel
#align mul_left_injective mul_left_injective
#align add_left_injective add_left_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_left_inj (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a = c * a ↔ b = c :=
(mul_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align mul_left_inj mul_left_inj
#align add_left_inj add_left_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ne_mul_left (a : G) {b c : G} : b * a ≠ c * a ↔ b ≠ c :=
(mul_left_injective a).ne_iff
#align mul_ne_mul_left mul_ne_mul_left
#align add_ne_add_left add_ne_add_left
end IsRightCancelMul
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
instance Semigroup.to_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_assoc⟩
#align semigroup.to_is_associative Semigroup.to_isAssociative
#align add_semigroup.to_is_associative AddSemigroup.to_isAssociative
/-- Composing two multiplications on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the left by `x * y`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the left by `y` then `x`
is equal to an addition on the left by `x + y`."]
theorem comp_mul_left (x y : α) : (x * ·) ∘ (y * ·) = (x * y * ·) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
#align comp_mul_left comp_mul_left
#align comp_add_left comp_add_left
/-- Composing two multiplications on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to a multiplication on the right by `y * x`.
-/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Composing two additions on the right by `y` and `x`
is equal to an addition on the right by `y + x`."]
theorem comp_mul_right (x y : α) : (· * x) ∘ (· * y) = (· * (y * x)) := by
ext z
simp [mul_assoc]
#align comp_mul_right comp_mul_right
#align comp_add_right comp_add_right
end Semigroup
@[to_additive]
instance CommMagma.to_isCommutative [CommMagma G] : Std.Commutative (α := G) (· * ·) := ⟨mul_comm⟩
#align comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative CommMagma.to_isCommutative
#align add_comm_semigroup.to_is_commutative AddCommMagma.to_isCommutative
section MulOneClass
variable {M : Type u} [MulOneClass M]
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul_one {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P (a * b) 1 = ite P a 1 * ite P b 1 := by
by_cases h:P <;> simp [h]
#align ite_mul_one ite_mul_one
#align ite_add_zero ite_add_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_one_mul {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {a b : M} :
ite P 1 (a * b) = ite P 1 a * ite P 1 b := by
by_cases h:P <;> simp [h]
#align ite_one_mul ite_one_mul
#align ite_zero_add ite_zero_add
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one {a b : M} (h : a * b = 1) : a = 1 ↔ b = 1 := by
constructor <;> (rintro rfl; simpa using h)
#align eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one eq_one_iff_eq_one_of_mul_eq_one
#align eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero eq_zero_iff_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_mul_eq_id : ((1 : M) * ·) = id :=
funext one_mul
#align one_mul_eq_id one_mul_eq_id
#align zero_add_eq_id zero_add_eq_id
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_eq_id : (· * (1 : M)) = id :=
funext mul_one
#align mul_one_eq_id mul_one_eq_id
#align add_zero_eq_id add_zero_eq_id
end MulOneClass
section CommSemigroup
variable [CommSemigroup G]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_comm : ∀ a b c : G, a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) :=
left_comm Mul.mul mul_comm mul_assoc
#align mul_left_comm mul_left_comm
#align add_left_comm add_left_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_comm : ∀ a b c : G, a * b * c = a * c * b :=
right_comm Mul.mul mul_comm mul_assoc
#align mul_right_comm mul_right_comm
#align add_right_comm add_right_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : G) : a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc]
#align mul_mul_mul_comm mul_mul_mul_comm
#align add_add_add_comm add_add_add_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate (a b c : G) : a * b * c = b * c * a := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
#align mul_rotate mul_rotate
#align add_rotate add_rotate
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_rotate' (a b c : G) : a * (b * c) = b * (c * a) := by
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_comm]
#align mul_rotate' mul_rotate'
#align add_rotate' add_rotate'
end CommSemigroup
section AddCommSemigroup
set_option linter.deprecated false
variable {M : Type u} [AddCommSemigroup M]
theorem bit0_add (a b : M) : bit0 (a + b) = bit0 a + bit0 b :=
add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
#align bit0_add bit0_add
theorem bit1_add [One M] (a b : M) : bit1 (a + b) = bit0 a + bit1 b :=
(congr_arg (· + (1 : M)) <| bit0_add a b : _).trans (add_assoc _ _ _)
#align bit1_add bit1_add
theorem bit1_add' [One M] (a b : M) : bit1 (a + b) = bit1 a + bit0 b := by
rw [add_comm, bit1_add, add_comm]
#align bit1_add' bit1_add'
end AddCommSemigroup
section AddMonoid
set_option linter.deprecated false
variable {M : Type u} [AddMonoid M] {a b c : M}
@[simp]
theorem bit0_zero : bit0 (0 : M) = 0 :=
add_zero _
#align bit0_zero bit0_zero
@[simp]
theorem bit1_zero [One M] : bit1 (0 : M) = 1 := by rw [bit1, bit0_zero, zero_add]
#align bit1_zero bit1_zero
end AddMonoid
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc sub_eq_add_neg
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] {a b c : M} {m n : ℕ}
@[to_additive boole_nsmul]
lemma pow_boole (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : M) :
(a ^ if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 1 := by simp only [pow_ite, pow_one, pow_zero]
#align pow_boole pow_boole
@[to_additive nsmul_add_sub_nsmul]
lemma pow_mul_pow_sub (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m * a ^ (n - m) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
#align pow_mul_pow_sub pow_mul_pow_sub
#align nsmul_add_sub_nsmul nsmul_add_sub_nsmul
@[to_additive sub_nsmul_nsmul_add]
lemma pow_sub_mul_pow (a : M) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
#align pow_sub_mul_pow pow_sub_mul_pow
#align sub_nsmul_nsmul_add sub_nsmul_nsmul_add
@[to_additive sub_one_nsmul_add]
lemma mul_pow_sub_one (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a * a ^ (n - 1) = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel $ Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
@[to_additive add_sub_one_nsmul]
lemma pow_sub_one_mul (hn : n ≠ 0) (a : M) : a ^ (n - 1) * a = a ^ n := by
rw [← pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel $ Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hn]
/-- If `x ^ n = 1`, then `x ^ m` is the same as `x ^ (m % n)` -/
@[to_additive nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul "If `n • x = 0`, then `m • x` is the same as `(m % n) • x`"]
lemma pow_eq_pow_mod (m : ℕ) (ha : a ^ n = 1) : a ^ m = a ^ (m % n) := by
calc
a ^ m = a ^ (m % n + n * (m / n)) := by rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
_ = a ^ (m % n) := by simp [pow_add, pow_mul, ha]
#align pow_eq_pow_mod pow_eq_pow_mod
#align nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul nsmul_eq_mod_nsmul
@[to_additive] lemma pow_mul_pow_eq_one : ∀ n, a * b = 1 → a ^ n * b ^ n = 1
| 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, h =>
calc
a ^ n.succ * b ^ n.succ = a ^ n * a * (b * b ^ n) := by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ']
_ = a ^ n * (a * b) * b ^ n := by simp only [mul_assoc]
_ = 1 := by simp [h, pow_mul_pow_eq_one]
#align pow_mul_pow_eq_one pow_mul_pow_eq_one
#align nsmul_add_nsmul_eq_zero nsmul_add_nsmul_eq_zero
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid M] {x y z : M}
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_unique (hy : x * y = 1) (hz : x * z = 1) : y = z :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (Trans.trans (mul_comm _ _) hy) hz
#align inv_unique inv_unique
#align neg_unique neg_unique
@[to_additive nsmul_add] lemma mul_pow (a b : M) : ∀ n, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ', pow_succ', mul_pow, mul_mul_mul_comm]
#align mul_pow mul_pow
#align nsmul_add nsmul_add
end CommMonoid
section LeftCancelMonoid
variable {M : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_right_eq_self : a * b = a ↔ b = 1 := calc
a * b = a ↔ a * b = a * 1 := by rw [mul_one]
_ ↔ b = 1 := mul_left_cancel_iff
#align mul_right_eq_self mul_right_eq_self
#align add_right_eq_self add_right_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem self_eq_mul_right : a = a * b ↔ b = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_right_eq_self
#align self_eq_mul_right self_eq_mul_right
#align self_eq_add_right self_eq_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_ne_self : a * b ≠ a ↔ b ≠ 1 := mul_right_eq_self.not
#align mul_right_ne_self mul_right_ne_self
#align add_right_ne_self add_right_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem self_ne_mul_right : a ≠ a * b ↔ b ≠ 1 := self_eq_mul_right.not
#align self_ne_mul_right self_ne_mul_right
#align self_ne_add_right self_ne_add_right
end LeftCancelMonoid
section RightCancelMonoid
variable {M : Type u} [RightCancelMonoid M] {a b : M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_left_eq_self : a * b = b ↔ a = 1 := calc
a * b = b ↔ a * b = 1 * b := by rw [one_mul]
_ ↔ a = 1 := mul_right_cancel_iff
#align mul_left_eq_self mul_left_eq_self
#align add_left_eq_self add_left_eq_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem self_eq_mul_left : b = a * b ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans mul_left_eq_self
#align self_eq_mul_left self_eq_mul_left
#align self_eq_add_left self_eq_add_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_ne_self : a * b ≠ b ↔ a ≠ 1 := mul_left_eq_self.not
#align mul_left_ne_self mul_left_ne_self
#align add_left_ne_self add_left_ne_self
@[to_additive]
theorem self_ne_mul_left : b ≠ a * b ↔ a ≠ 1 := self_eq_mul_left.not
#align self_ne_mul_left self_ne_mul_left
#align self_ne_add_left self_ne_add_left
end RightCancelMonoid
section CancelCommMonoid
variable [CancelCommMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
@[to_additive] lemma eq_iff_eq_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a = c ↔ b = d := by aesop
@[to_additive] lemma ne_iff_ne_of_mul_eq_mul (h : a * b = c * d) : a ≠ c ↔ b ≠ d := by aesop
end CancelCommMonoid
section InvolutiveInv
variable [InvolutiveInv G] {a b : G}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_involutive : Function.Involutive (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_inv
#align inv_involutive inv_involutive
#align neg_involutive neg_involutive
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_surjective : Function.Surjective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.surjective
#align inv_surjective inv_surjective
#align neg_surjective neg_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_injective : Function.Injective (Inv.inv : G → G) :=
inv_involutive.injective
#align inv_injective inv_injective
#align neg_injective neg_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_inj : a⁻¹ = b⁻¹ ↔ a = b :=
inv_injective.eq_iff
#align inv_inj inv_inj
#align neg_inj neg_inj
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_eq_inv : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ (inv_inv a).symm, fun h => h.symm ▸ inv_inv b⟩
#align inv_eq_iff_eq_inv inv_eq_iff_eq_inv
#align neg_eq_iff_eq_neg neg_eq_iff_eq_neg
variable (G)
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_comp_inv : Inv.inv ∘ Inv.inv = @id G :=
inv_involutive.comp_self
#align inv_comp_inv inv_comp_inv
#align neg_comp_neg neg_comp_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem leftInverse_inv : LeftInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
#align left_inverse_inv leftInverse_inv
#align left_inverse_neg leftInverse_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem rightInverse_inv : RightInverse (fun a : G ↦ a⁻¹) fun a ↦ a⁻¹ :=
inv_inv
#align right_inverse_inv rightInverse_inv
#align right_inverse_neg rightInverse_neg
end InvolutiveInv
section DivInvMonoid
variable [DivInvMonoid G] {a b c : G}
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem inv_eq_one_div (x : G) : x⁻¹ = 1 / x := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul]
#align inv_eq_one_div inv_eq_one_div
#align neg_eq_zero_sub neg_eq_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_one_div (x y : G) : x * (1 / y) = x / y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align mul_one_div mul_one_div
#align add_zero_sub add_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_assoc (a b c : G) : a * b / c = a * (b / c) := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc _ _ _]
#align mul_div_assoc mul_div_assoc
#align add_sub_assoc add_sub_assoc
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem mul_div_assoc' (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c :=
(mul_div_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align mul_div_assoc' mul_div_assoc'
#align add_sub_assoc' add_sub_assoc'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_div (a : G) : 1 / a = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_one_div a).symm
#align one_div one_div
#align zero_sub zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div (a b c : G) : a * (b / c) = a * b / c := by simp only [mul_assoc, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align mul_div mul_div
#align add_sub add_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_mul_one_div (a b : G) : a / b = a * (1 / b) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, one_div]
#align div_eq_mul_one_div div_eq_mul_one_div
#align sub_eq_add_zero_sub sub_eq_add_zero_sub
end DivInvMonoid
section DivInvOneMonoid
variable [DivInvOneMonoid G]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_one (a : G) : a / 1 = a := by simp [div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_one div_one
#align sub_zero sub_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one : (1 : G) / 1 = 1 :=
div_one _
#align one_div_one one_div_one
#align zero_sub_zero zero_sub_zero
end DivInvOneMonoid
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α] {a b c d : α}
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = a⁻¹ :=
(inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right h).symm
#align eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right
#align eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left (h : b * a = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h, one_div]
#align eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_left
#align eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_left eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right (h : a * b = 1) : b = 1 / a := by
rw [eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_right h, one_div]
#align eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right eq_one_div_of_mul_eq_one_right
#align eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_right eq_zero_sub_of_add_eq_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_div_eq_one (h : a / b = 1) : a = b :=
inv_injective <| inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right <| by rwa [← div_eq_mul_inv]
#align eq_of_div_eq_one eq_of_div_eq_one
#align eq_of_sub_eq_zero eq_of_sub_eq_zero
lemma eq_of_inv_mul_eq_one (h : a⁻¹ * b = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
lemma eq_of_mul_inv_eq_one (h : a * b⁻¹ = 1) : a = b := by simpa using eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left h
@[to_additive]
theorem div_ne_one_of_ne : a ≠ b → a / b ≠ 1 :=
mt eq_of_div_eq_one
#align div_ne_one_of_ne div_ne_one_of_ne
#align sub_ne_zero_of_ne sub_ne_zero_of_ne
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div_rev : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (b * a) := by simp
#align one_div_mul_one_div_rev one_div_mul_one_div_rev
#align zero_sub_add_zero_sub_rev zero_sub_add_zero_sub_rev
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_left : a⁻¹ / b = (b * a)⁻¹ := by simp
#align inv_div_left inv_div_left
#align neg_sub_left neg_sub_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_div : (a / b)⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
#align inv_div inv_div
#align neg_sub neg_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_div : 1 / (a / b) = b / a := by simp
#align one_div_div one_div_div
#align zero_sub_sub zero_sub_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_one_div : 1 / (1 / a) = a := by simp
#align one_div_one_div one_div_one_div
#align zero_sub_zero_sub zero_sub_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_div_iff_comm : a / b = c / d ↔ b / a = d / c :=
inv_inj.symm.trans <| by simp only [inv_div]
@[to_additive SubtractionMonoid.toSubNegZeroMonoid]
instance (priority := 100) DivisionMonoid.toDivInvOneMonoid : DivInvOneMonoid α :=
{ DivisionMonoid.toDivInvMonoid with
inv_one := by simpa only [one_div, inv_inv] using (inv_div (1 : α) 1).symm }
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_pow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℕ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, inv_one]
| n + 1 => by rw [pow_succ', pow_succ, inv_pow _ n, mul_inv_rev]
#align inv_pow inv_pow
#align neg_nsmul neg_nsmul
-- the attributes are intentionally out of order. `smul_zero` proves `zsmul_zero`.
@[to_additive zsmul_zero, simp]
lemma one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : α) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
#align one_zpow one_zpow
#align zsmul_zero zsmul_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) neg_zsmul]
lemma zpow_neg (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a ^ (-n) = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => DivInvMonoid.zpow_neg' _ _
| 0 => by
change a ^ (0 : ℤ) = (a ^ (0 : ℤ))⁻¹
simp
| Int.negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, inv_inv, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
#align zpow_neg zpow_neg
#align neg_zsmul neg_zsmul
@[to_additive neg_one_zsmul_add]
lemma mul_zpow_neg_one (a b : α) : (a * b) ^ (-1 : ℤ) = b ^ (-1 : ℤ) * a ^ (-1 : ℤ) := by
simp only [zpow_neg, zpow_one, mul_inv_rev]
#align mul_zpow_neg_one mul_zpow_neg_one
#align neg_one_zsmul_add neg_one_zsmul_add
@[to_additive zsmul_neg]
lemma inv_zpow (a : α) : ∀ n : ℤ, a⁻¹ ^ n = (a ^ n)⁻¹
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, inv_pow]
| .negSucc n => by rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, inv_pow]
#align inv_zpow inv_zpow
#align zsmul_neg zsmul_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_neg']
lemma inv_zpow' (a : α) (n : ℤ) : a⁻¹ ^ n = a ^ (-n) := by rw [inv_zpow, zpow_neg]
#align inv_zpow' inv_zpow'
#align zsmul_neg' zsmul_neg'
@[to_additive nsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_pow (a : α) (n : ℕ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
#align one_div_pow one_div_pow
#align nsmul_zero_sub nsmul_zero_sub
@[to_additive zsmul_zero_sub]
lemma one_div_zpow (a : α) (n : ℤ) : (1 / a) ^ n = 1 / a ^ n := by simp only [one_div, inv_zpow]
#align one_div_zpow one_div_zpow
#align zsmul_zero_sub zsmul_zero_sub
variable {a b c}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_eq_one : a⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
inv_injective.eq_iff' inv_one
#align inv_eq_one inv_eq_one
#align neg_eq_zero neg_eq_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem one_eq_inv : 1 = a⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 :=
eq_comm.trans inv_eq_one
#align one_eq_inv one_eq_inv
#align zero_eq_neg zero_eq_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_ne_one : a⁻¹ ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 :=
inv_eq_one.not
#align inv_ne_one inv_ne_one
#align neg_ne_zero neg_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div (h : 1 / a = 1 / b) : a = b := by
rw [← one_div_one_div a, h, one_div_one_div]
#align eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div eq_of_one_div_eq_one_div
#align eq_of_zero_sub_eq_zero_sub eq_of_zero_sub_eq_zero_sub
-- Note that `mul_zsmul` and `zpow_mul` have the primes swapped
-- when additivised since their argument order,
-- and therefore the more "natural" choice of lemma, is reversed.
@[to_additive mul_zsmul'] lemma zpow_mul (a : α) : ∀ m n : ℤ, a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_natCast, ← pow_mul, ← zpow_natCast]
rfl
| (m : ℕ), .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← pow_mul, Int.ofNat_mul_negSucc, zpow_neg, inv_inj,
← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, ← pow_mul, Int.negSucc_mul_ofNat, zpow_neg, inv_pow,
inv_inj, ← zpow_natCast]
| .negSucc m, .negSucc n => by
rw [zpow_negSucc, zpow_negSucc, Int.negSucc_mul_negSucc, inv_pow, inv_inv, ← pow_mul, ←
zpow_natCast]
rfl
#align zpow_mul zpow_mul
#align mul_zsmul' mul_zsmul'
@[to_additive mul_zsmul]
lemma zpow_mul' (a : α) (m n : ℤ) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by rw [Int.mul_comm, zpow_mul]
#align zpow_mul' zpow_mul'
#align mul_zsmul mul_zsmul
#noalign zpow_bit0
#noalign bit0_zsmul
#noalign zpow_bit0'
#noalign bit0_zsmul'
#noalign zpow_bit1
#noalign bit1_zsmul
variable (a b c)
@[to_additive, field_simps] -- The attributes are out of order on purpose
theorem div_div_eq_mul_div : a / (b / c) = a * c / b := by simp
#align div_div_eq_mul_div div_div_eq_mul_div
#align sub_sub_eq_add_sub sub_sub_eq_add_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_inv_eq_mul : a / b⁻¹ = a * b := by simp
#align div_inv_eq_mul div_inv_eq_mul
#align sub_neg_eq_add sub_neg_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div_swap : a / (b * c) = a / c / b := by
simp only [mul_assoc, mul_inv_rev, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align div_mul_eq_div_div_swap div_mul_eq_div_div_swap
#align sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap sub_add_eq_sub_sub_swap
end DivisionMonoid
section SubtractionMonoid
set_option linter.deprecated false
lemma bit0_neg [SubtractionMonoid α] (a : α) : bit0 (-a) = -bit0 a := (neg_add_rev _ _).symm
#align bit0_neg bit0_neg
end SubtractionMonoid
section DivisionCommMonoid
variable [DivisionCommMonoid α] (a b c d : α)
attribute [local simp] mul_assoc mul_comm mul_left_comm div_eq_mul_inv
@[to_additive neg_add]
theorem mul_inv : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * b⁻¹ := by simp
#align mul_inv mul_inv
#align neg_add neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div' : (a / b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ := by simp
#align inv_div' inv_div'
#align neg_sub' neg_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem div_eq_inv_mul : a / b = b⁻¹ * a := by simp
#align div_eq_inv_mul div_eq_inv_mul
#align sub_eq_neg_add sub_eq_neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_div : a⁻¹ * b = b / a := by simp
#align inv_mul_eq_div inv_mul_eq_div
#align neg_add_eq_sub neg_add_eq_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul' : (a * b)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ / b := by simp
#align inv_mul' inv_mul'
#align neg_add' neg_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_div_inv : a⁻¹ / b⁻¹ = b / a := by simp
#align inv_div_inv inv_div_inv
#align neg_sub_neg neg_sub_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_inv_div_inv : (a⁻¹ / b⁻¹)⁻¹ = a / b := by simp
#align inv_inv_div_inv inv_inv_div_inv
#align neg_neg_sub_neg neg_neg_sub_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_one_div : 1 / a * (1 / b) = 1 / (a * b) := by simp
#align one_div_mul_one_div one_div_mul_one_div
#align zero_sub_add_zero_sub zero_sub_add_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_right_comm : a / b / c = a / c / b := by simp
#align div_right_comm div_right_comm
#align sub_right_comm sub_right_comm
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_div : a / b / c = a / (b * c) := by simp
#align div_div div_div
#align sub_sub sub_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul : a / b * c = a / (b / c) := by simp
#align div_mul div_mul
#align sub_add sub_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_left_comm : a * (b / c) = b * (a / c) := by simp
#align mul_div_left_comm mul_div_left_comm
#align add_sub_left_comm add_sub_left_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_right_comm : a * b / c = a / c * b := by simp
#align mul_div_right_comm mul_div_right_comm
#align add_sub_right_comm add_sub_right_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_div : a / (b * c) = a / b / c := by simp
#align div_mul_eq_div_div div_mul_eq_div_div
#align sub_add_eq_sub_sub sub_add_eq_sub_sub
@[to_additive, field_simps]
theorem div_mul_eq_mul_div : a / b * c = a * c / b := by simp
#align div_mul_eq_mul_div div_mul_eq_mul_div
#align sub_add_eq_add_sub sub_add_eq_add_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem one_div_mul_eq_div : 1 / a * b = b / a := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_comm_div : a / b * c = a * (c / b) := by simp
#align mul_comm_div mul_comm_div
#align add_comm_sub add_comm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_comm : a / b * c = c / b * a := by simp
#align div_mul_comm div_mul_comm
#align sub_add_comm sub_add_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div : a / (b * c) = a / b * (1 / c) := by simp
#align div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div
#align sub_add_eq_sub_add_zero_sub sub_add_eq_sub_add_zero_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_eq : a / b / (c / d) = a * d / (b * c) := by simp
#align div_div_div_eq div_div_div_eq
#align sub_sub_sub_eq sub_sub_sub_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem div_div_div_comm : a / b / (c / d) = a / c / (b / d) := by simp
#align div_div_div_comm div_div_div_comm
#align sub_sub_sub_comm sub_sub_sub_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mul_div_comm : a / b * (c / d) = a * c / (b * d) := by simp
#align div_mul_div_comm div_mul_div_comm
#align sub_add_sub_comm sub_add_sub_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_div_mul_comm : a * b / (c * d) = a / c * (b / d) := by simp
#align mul_div_mul_comm mul_div_mul_comm
#align add_sub_add_comm add_sub_add_comm
@[to_additive zsmul_add] lemma mul_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by simp_rw [zpow_natCast, mul_pow]
| .negSucc n => by simp_rw [zpow_negSucc, ← inv_pow, mul_inv, mul_pow]
#align mul_zpow mul_zpow
#align zsmul_add zsmul_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nsmul_sub]
lemma div_pow (a b : α) (n : ℕ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow, inv_pow]
#align div_pow div_pow
#align nsmul_sub nsmul_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zsmul_sub]
lemma div_zpow (a b : α) (n : ℤ) : (a / b) ^ n = a ^ n / b ^ n := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_zpow, inv_zpow]
#align div_zpow div_zpow
#align zsmul_sub zsmul_sub
end DivisionCommMonoid
section Group
variable [Group G] {a b c d : G} {n : ℤ}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem div_eq_inv_self : a / b = b⁻¹ ↔ a = 1 := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_left_eq_self]
#align div_eq_inv_self div_eq_inv_self
#align sub_eq_neg_self sub_eq_neg_self
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_left_surjective (a : G) : Surjective (a * ·) :=
fun x ↦ ⟨a⁻¹ * x, mul_inv_cancel_left a x⟩
#align mul_left_surjective mul_left_surjective
#align add_left_surjective add_left_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_right_surjective (a : G) : Function.Surjective fun x ↦ x * a := fun x ↦
⟨x * a⁻¹, inv_mul_cancel_right x a⟩
#align mul_right_surjective mul_right_surjective
#align add_right_surjective add_right_surjective
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (h : a * c = b) : a = b * c⁻¹ := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq
#align eq_add_neg_of_add_eq eq_add_neg_of_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq (h : b * a = c) : a = b⁻¹ * c := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq
#align eq_neg_add_of_add_eq eq_neg_add_of_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul (h : b = a * c) : a⁻¹ * b = c := by simp [h]
#align inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul inv_mul_eq_of_eq_mul
#align neg_add_eq_of_eq_add neg_add_eq_of_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul (h : a = c * b) : a * b⁻¹ = c := by simp [h]
#align mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul mul_inv_eq_of_eq_mul
#align add_neg_eq_of_eq_add add_neg_eq_of_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq (h : a * c⁻¹ = b) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm]
#align eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq eq_mul_of_mul_inv_eq
#align eq_add_of_add_neg_eq eq_add_of_add_neg_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq (h : b⁻¹ * a = c) : a = b * c := by simp [h.symm, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq eq_mul_of_inv_mul_eq
#align eq_add_of_neg_add_eq eq_add_of_neg_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul (h : b = a⁻¹ * c) : a * b = c := by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul mul_eq_of_eq_inv_mul
#align add_eq_of_eq_neg_add add_eq_of_eq_neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv (h : a = c * b⁻¹) : a * b = c := by simp [h]
#align mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv mul_eq_of_eq_mul_inv
#align add_eq_of_eq_add_neg add_eq_of_eq_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv : a * b = 1 ↔ a = b⁻¹ :=
⟨eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left, fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_left_inv]⟩
#align mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv
#align add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq : a * b = 1 ↔ a⁻¹ = b := by
rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_eq_iff_eq_inv]
#align mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq
#align add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one : a = b⁻¹ ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv.symm
#align eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one eq_inv_iff_mul_eq_one
#align eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one : a⁻¹ = b ↔ a * b = 1 :=
mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq.symm
#align inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one inv_eq_iff_mul_eq_one
#align neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq : a = b * c⁻¹ ↔ a * c = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
#align eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq
#align eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq eq_add_neg_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq : a = b⁻¹ * c ↔ b * a = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
#align eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq
#align eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq eq_neg_add_iff_add_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul : a⁻¹ * b = c ↔ b = a * c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, mul_inv_cancel_left], fun h ↦ by rw [h, inv_mul_cancel_left]⟩
#align inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add neg_add_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul : a * b⁻¹ = c ↔ a = c * b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h, inv_mul_cancel_right], fun h ↦ by rw [h, mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩
#align mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul
#align add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add add_neg_eq_iff_eq_add
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Basic.lean | 968 | 968 | theorem mul_inv_eq_one : a * b⁻¹ = 1 ↔ a = b := by | rw [mul_eq_one_iff_eq_inv, inv_inv]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.HomeomorphBall
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.calculus from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f9dd3204df14a0749cd456fac1e6849dfe7d2b88"
/-!
# Calculus in inner product spaces
In this file we prove that the inner product and square of the norm in an inner space are
infinitely `ℝ`-smooth. In order to state these results, we need a `NormedSpace ℝ E`
instance. Though we can deduce this structure from `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E`, this instance may be
not definitionally equal to some other “natural” instance. So, we assume `[NormedSpace ℝ E]`.
We also prove that functions to a `EuclideanSpace` are (higher) differentiable if and only if
their components are. This follows from the corresponding fact for finite product of normed spaces,
and from the equivalence of norms in finite dimensions.
## TODO
The last part of the file should be generalized to `PiLp`.
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open scoped Classical Topology
section DerivInner
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
variable (𝕜) [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- Derivative of the inner product. -/
def fderivInnerCLM (p : E × E) : E × E →L[ℝ] 𝕜 :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.deriv p
#align fderiv_inner_clm fderivInnerCLM
@[simp]
theorem fderivInnerCLM_apply (p x : E × E) : fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 p x = ⟪p.1, x.2⟫ + ⟪x.1, p.2⟫ :=
rfl
#align fderiv_inner_clm_apply fderivInnerCLM_apply
variable {𝕜} -- Porting note: Lean 3 magically switches back to `{𝕜}` here
theorem contDiff_inner {n} : ContDiff ℝ n fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.contDiff
#align cont_diff_inner contDiff_inner
theorem contDiffAt_inner {p : E × E} {n} : ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫) p :=
ContDiff.contDiffAt contDiff_inner
#align cont_diff_at_inner contDiffAt_inner
theorem differentiable_inner : Differentiable ℝ fun p : E × E => ⟪p.1, p.2⟫ :=
isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.differentiableAt
#align differentiable_inner differentiable_inner
variable (𝕜)
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G] {f g : G → E} {f' g' : G →L[ℝ] E}
{s : Set G} {x : G} {n : ℕ∞}
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.inner (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n g s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
contDiffAt_inner.comp_contDiffWithinAt x (hf.prod hg)
#align cont_diff_within_at.inner ContDiffWithinAt.inner
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.inner (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hg : ContDiffAt ℝ n g x) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
hf.inner 𝕜 hg
#align cont_diff_at.inner ContDiffAt.inner
theorem ContDiffOn.inner (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn ℝ n g s) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inner 𝕜 (hg x hx)
#align cont_diff_on.inner ContDiffOn.inner
theorem ContDiff.inner (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (hg : ContDiff ℝ n g) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫ :=
contDiff_inner.comp (hf.prod hg)
#align cont_diff.inner ContDiff.inner
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.inner (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hg : HasFDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') s
x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.hasFDerivAt (f x, g x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hf.prod hg)
#align has_fderiv_within_at.inner HasFDerivWithinAt.inner
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.inner (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasStrictFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.hasStrictFDerivAt (f x, g x)).comp x (hf.prod hg)
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.inner HasStrictFDerivAt.inner
theorem HasFDerivAt.inner (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hg : HasFDerivAt g g' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) ((fderivInnerCLM 𝕜 (f x, g x)).comp <| f'.prod g') x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_inner.hasFDerivAt (f x, g x)).comp x (hf.prod hg)
#align has_fderiv_at.inner HasFDerivAt.inner
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g g' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) s x := by
simpa using (hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivWithinAt).hasDerivWithinAt
#align has_deriv_within_at.inner HasDerivWithinAt.inner
theorem HasDerivAt.inner {f g : ℝ → E} {f' g' : E} {x : ℝ} :
HasDerivAt f f' x → HasDerivAt g g' x →
HasDerivAt (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) (⟪f x, g'⟫ + ⟪f', g x⟫) x := by
simpa only [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] using HasDerivWithinAt.inner 𝕜
#align has_deriv_at.inner HasDerivAt.inner
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.inner (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ g s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s x :=
((differentiable_inner _).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hf.prod hg).hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.inner DifferentiableWithinAt.inner
theorem DifferentiableAt.inner (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) x :=
(differentiable_inner _).comp x (hf.prod hg)
#align differentiable_at.inner DifferentiableAt.inner
theorem DifferentiableOn.inner (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℝ g s) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inner 𝕜 (hg x hx)
#align differentiable_on.inner DifferentiableOn.inner
theorem Differentiable.inner (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hg : Differentiable ℝ g) :
Differentiable ℝ fun x => ⟪f x, g x⟫ := fun x => (hf x).inner 𝕜 (hg x)
#align differentiable.inner Differentiable.inner
theorem fderiv_inner_apply (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x) (y : G) :
fderiv ℝ (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) x y = ⟪f x, fderiv ℝ g x y⟫ + ⟪fderiv ℝ f x y, g x⟫ := by
rw [(hf.hasFDerivAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasFDerivAt).fderiv]; rfl
#align fderiv_inner_apply fderiv_inner_apply
theorem deriv_inner_apply {f g : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ} (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x)
(hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x) :
deriv (fun t => ⟪f t, g t⟫) x = ⟪f x, deriv g x⟫ + ⟪deriv f x, g x⟫ :=
(hf.hasDerivAt.inner 𝕜 hg.hasDerivAt).deriv
#align deriv_inner_apply deriv_inner_apply
theorem contDiff_norm_sq : ContDiff ℝ n fun x : E => ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
convert (reCLM : 𝕜 →L[ℝ] ℝ).contDiff.comp ((contDiff_id (E := E)).inner 𝕜 (contDiff_id (E := E)))
exact (inner_self_eq_norm_sq _).symm
#align cont_diff_norm_sq contDiff_norm_sq
theorem ContDiff.norm_sq (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) : ContDiff ℝ n fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ 2 :=
(contDiff_norm_sq 𝕜).comp hf
#align cont_diff.norm_sq ContDiff.norm_sq
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.norm_sq (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s x :=
(contDiff_norm_sq 𝕜).contDiffAt.comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
#align cont_diff_within_at.norm_sq ContDiffWithinAt.norm_sq
nonrec theorem ContDiffAt.norm_sq (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) : ContDiffAt ℝ n (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) x :=
hf.norm_sq 𝕜
#align cont_diff_at.norm_sq ContDiffAt.norm_sq
theorem contDiffAt_norm {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) : ContDiffAt ℝ n norm x := by
have : ‖id x‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero 2 (norm_pos_iff.2 hx).ne'
simpa only [id, sqrt_sq, norm_nonneg] using (contDiffAt_id.norm_sq 𝕜).sqrt this
#align cont_diff_at_norm contDiffAt_norm
theorem ContDiffAt.norm (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖) x :=
(contDiffAt_norm 𝕜 h0).comp x hf
#align cont_diff_at.norm ContDiffAt.norm
theorem ContDiffAt.dist (hf : ContDiffAt ℝ n f x) (hg : ContDiffAt ℝ n g x) (hne : f x ≠ g x) :
ContDiffAt ℝ n (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]
exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
#align cont_diff_at.dist ContDiffAt.dist
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.norm (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖) s x :=
(contDiffAt_norm 𝕜 h0).comp_contDiffWithinAt x hf
#align cont_diff_within_at.norm ContDiffWithinAt.norm
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.dist (hf : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n f s x) (hg : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n g s x)
(hne : f x ≠ g x) : ContDiffWithinAt ℝ n (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]; exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
#align cont_diff_within_at.dist ContDiffWithinAt.dist
theorem ContDiffOn.norm_sq (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) : ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s :=
fun x hx => (hf x hx).norm_sq 𝕜
#align cont_diff_on.norm_sq ContDiffOn.norm_sq
theorem ContDiffOn.norm (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun y => ‖f y‖) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).norm 𝕜 (h0 x hx)
#align cont_diff_on.norm ContDiffOn.norm
theorem ContDiffOn.dist (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) (hg : ContDiffOn ℝ n g s)
(hne : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ g x) : ContDiffOn ℝ n (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).dist 𝕜 (hg x hx) (hne x hx)
#align cont_diff_on.dist ContDiffOn.dist
theorem ContDiff.norm (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) : ContDiff ℝ n fun y => ‖f y‖ :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun x => hf.contDiffAt.norm 𝕜 (h0 x)
#align cont_diff.norm ContDiff.norm
theorem ContDiff.dist (hf : ContDiff ℝ n f) (hg : ContDiff ℝ n g) (hne : ∀ x, f x ≠ g x) :
ContDiff ℝ n fun y => dist (f y) (g y) :=
contDiff_iff_contDiffAt.2 fun x => hf.contDiffAt.dist 𝕜 hg.contDiffAt (hne x)
#align cont_diff.dist ContDiff.dist
-- Porting note: use `2 •` instead of `bit0`
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq (x : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x => ‖x‖ ^ 2) (2 • (innerSL ℝ x)) x := by
simp only [sq, ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ]
convert (hasStrictFDerivAt_id x).inner ℝ (hasStrictFDerivAt_id x)
ext y
simp [two_smul, real_inner_comm]
#align has_strict_fderiv_at_norm_sq hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sqₓ
theorem HasFDerivAt.norm_sq {f : G → F} {f' : G →L[ℝ] F} (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 • (innerSL ℝ (f x)).comp f') x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq _).hasFDerivAt.comp x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.norm_sq {f : ℝ → F} {f' : F} {x : ℝ} (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) :
HasDerivAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 * Inner.inner (f x) f') x := by
simpa using hf.hasFDerivAt.norm_sq.hasDerivAt
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.norm_sq {f : G → F} {f' : G →L[ℝ] F} (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 • (innerSL ℝ (f x)).comp f') s x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_norm_sq _).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.norm_sq {f : ℝ → F} {f' : F} {s : Set ℝ} {x : ℝ}
(hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (‖f ·‖ ^ 2) (2 * Inner.inner (f x) f') s x := by
simpa using hf.hasFDerivWithinAt.norm_sq.hasDerivWithinAt
theorem DifferentiableAt.norm_sq (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) x :=
((contDiffAt_id.norm_sq 𝕜).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp x hf
#align differentiable_at.norm_sq DifferentiableAt.norm_sq
theorem DifferentiableAt.norm (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖) x :=
((contDiffAt_norm 𝕜 h0).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp x hf
#align differentiable_at.norm DifferentiableAt.norm
theorem DifferentiableAt.dist (hf : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x) (hg : DifferentiableAt ℝ g x)
(hne : f x ≠ g x) : DifferentiableAt ℝ (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]; exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
#align differentiable_at.dist DifferentiableAt.dist
theorem Differentiable.norm_sq (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) : Differentiable ℝ fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2 :=
fun x => (hf x).norm_sq 𝕜
#align differentiable.norm_sq Differentiable.norm_sq
theorem Differentiable.norm (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (h0 : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0) :
Differentiable ℝ fun y => ‖f y‖ := fun x => (hf x).norm 𝕜 (h0 x)
#align differentiable.norm Differentiable.norm
theorem Differentiable.dist (hf : Differentiable ℝ f) (hg : Differentiable ℝ g)
(hne : ∀ x, f x ≠ g x) : Differentiable ℝ fun y => dist (f y) (g y) := fun x =>
(hf x).dist 𝕜 (hg x) (hne x)
#align differentiable.dist Differentiable.dist
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.norm_sq (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s x :=
((contDiffAt_id.norm_sq 𝕜).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp_differentiableWithinAt x hf
#align differentiable_within_at.norm_sq DifferentiableWithinAt.norm_sq
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.norm (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x) (h0 : f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖) s x :=
((contDiffAt_id.norm 𝕜 h0).differentiableAt le_rfl).comp_differentiableWithinAt x hf
#align differentiable_within_at.norm DifferentiableWithinAt.norm
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.dist (hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ f s x)
(hg : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ g s x) (hne : f x ≠ g x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s x := by
simp only [dist_eq_norm]
exact (hf.sub hg).norm 𝕜 (sub_ne_zero.2 hne)
#align differentiable_within_at.dist DifferentiableWithinAt.dist
theorem DifferentiableOn.norm_sq (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖ ^ 2) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).norm_sq 𝕜
#align differentiable_on.norm_sq DifferentiableOn.norm_sq
theorem DifferentiableOn.norm (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (h0 : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun y => ‖f y‖) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).norm 𝕜 (h0 x hx)
#align differentiable_on.norm DifferentiableOn.norm
theorem DifferentiableOn.dist (hf : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (hg : DifferentiableOn ℝ g s)
(hne : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ g x) : DifferentiableOn ℝ (fun y => dist (f y) (g y)) s := fun x hx =>
(hf x hx).dist 𝕜 (hg x hx) (hne x hx)
#align differentiable_on.dist DifferentiableOn.dist
end DerivInner
section PiLike
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable {𝕜 ι H : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H] [Fintype ι]
{f : H → EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι} {f' : H →L[𝕜] EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι} {t : Set H} {y : H}
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Calculus.lean | 310 | 313 | theorem differentiableWithinAt_euclidean :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f t y ↔ ∀ i, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => f x i) t y := by |
rw [← (EuclideanSpace.equiv ι 𝕜).comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff, differentiableWithinAt_pi]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Instances
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.list.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists Set.range
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Ring
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
-- Porting note: Delete this attribute
-- attribute [inline] List.head!
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
#align list.unique_of_is_empty List.uniqueOfIsEmpty
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
#align list.cons_ne_nil List.cons_ne_nil
#align list.cons_ne_self List.cons_ne_self
#align list.head_eq_of_cons_eq List.head_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
#align list.tail_eq_of_cons_eq List.tail_eq_of_cons_eqₓ -- implicits order
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
#align list.cons_injective List.cons_injective
#align list.cons_inj List.cons_inj
#align list.cons_eq_cons List.cons_eq_cons
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
#align list.singleton_injective List.singleton_injective
theorem singleton_inj {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align list.singleton_inj List.singleton_inj
#align list.exists_cons_of_ne_nil List.exists_cons_of_ne_nil
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
#align list.set_of_mem_cons List.set_of_mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
#align list.mem_singleton_self List.mem_singleton_self
#align list.eq_of_mem_singleton List.eq_of_mem_singleton
#align list.mem_singleton List.mem_singleton
#align list.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem List.mem_of_mem_cons_of_mem
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
#align decidable.list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem
#align list.not_mem_append List.not_mem_append
#align list.ne_nil_of_mem List.ne_nil_of_mem
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias mem_split := append_of_mem
#align list.mem_split List.append_of_mem
#align list.mem_of_ne_of_mem List.mem_of_ne_of_mem
#align list.ne_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem List.not_mem_cons_of_ne_of_not_mem
#align list.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons List.ne_and_not_mem_of_not_mem_cons
#align list.mem_map List.mem_map
#align list.exists_of_mem_map List.exists_of_mem_map
#align list.mem_map_of_mem List.mem_map_of_memₓ -- implicits order
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem _⟩
#align list.mem_map_of_injective List.mem_map_of_injective
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
#align function.involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
#align list.mem_map_of_involutive List.mem_map_of_involutive
#align list.forall_mem_map_iff List.forall_mem_map_iffₓ -- universe order
#align list.map_eq_nil List.map_eq_nilₓ -- universe order
attribute [simp] List.mem_join
#align list.mem_join List.mem_join
#align list.exists_of_mem_join List.exists_of_mem_join
#align list.mem_join_of_mem List.mem_join_of_memₓ -- implicits order
attribute [simp] List.mem_bind
#align list.mem_bind List.mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3, And in Lean4
#align list.exists_of_mem_bind List.exists_of_mem_bindₓ -- implicits order
#align list.mem_bind_of_mem List.mem_bind_of_memₓ -- implicits order
#align list.bind_map List.bind_mapₓ -- implicits order
theorem map_bind (g : β → List γ) (f : α → β) :
∀ l : List α, (List.map f l).bind g = l.bind fun a => g (f a)
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by simp only [cons_bind, map_cons, map_bind _ _ l]
#align list.map_bind List.map_bind
/-! ### length -/
#align list.length_eq_zero List.length_eq_zero
#align list.length_singleton List.length_singleton
#align list.length_pos_of_mem List.length_pos_of_mem
#align list.exists_mem_of_length_pos List.exists_mem_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_iff_exists_mem List.length_pos_iff_exists_mem
alias ⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos
#align list.ne_nil_of_length_pos List.ne_nil_of_length_pos
#align list.length_pos_of_ne_nil List.length_pos_of_ne_nil
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
#align list.length_pos_iff_ne_nil List.length_pos_iff_ne_nil
#align list.exists_mem_of_ne_nil List.exists_mem_of_ne_nil
#align list.length_eq_one List.length_eq_one
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
#align list.exists_of_length_succ List.exists_of_length_succ
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· exact Subsingleton.elim _ _
· apply ih; simpa using hl
#align list.length_injective_iff List.length_injective_iff
@[simp default+1] -- Porting note: this used to be just @[simp]
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
#align list.length_injective List.length_injective
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_two List.length_eq_two
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
#align list.length_eq_three List.length_eq_three
#align list.sublist.length_le List.Sublist.length_le
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
#align list.has_singleton List.instSingletonList
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
-- ADHOC Porting note: instance from Lean3 core
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_emptyc_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg (not_mem_nil _) }
#align list.empty_eq List.empty_eq
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
#align list.singleton_eq List.singleton_eq
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
#align list.insert_neg List.insert_neg
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
#align list.insert_pos List.insert_pos
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
#align list.doubleton_eq List.doubleton_eq
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
#align list.forall_mem_nil List.forall_mem_nil
#align list.forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_cons
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
#align list.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons List.forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons
#align list.forall_mem_singleton List.forall_mem_singleton
#align list.forall_mem_append List.forall_mem_append
#align list.not_exists_mem_nil List.not_exists_mem_nilₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self _ _, h⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of List.exists_mem_cons_ofₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
#align list.exists_mem_cons_of_exists List.exists_mem_cons_of_existsₓ -- bExists change
-- Porting note: bExists in Lean3 and And in Lean4
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
#align list.or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons List.or_exists_of_exists_mem_consₓ -- bExists change
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
#align list.exists_mem_cons_iff List.exists_mem_cons_iff
/-! ### list subset -/
instance : IsTrans (List α) Subset where
trans := fun _ _ _ => List.Subset.trans
#align list.subset_def List.subset_def
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_left List.subset_append_of_subset_left
#align list.subset_append_of_subset_right List.subset_append_of_subset_right
#align list.cons_subset List.cons_subset
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
#align list.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem List.cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
#align list.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset List.append_subset_of_subset_of_subset
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.append_subset_iff List.append_subset
alias ⟨eq_nil_of_subset_nil, _⟩ := subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_of_subset_nil List.eq_nil_of_subset_nil
#align list.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem List.eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem
#align list.map_subset List.map_subset
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem f hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
#align list.map_subset_iff List.map_subset_iff
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
#align list.append_eq_has_append List.append_eq_has_append
#align list.singleton_append List.singleton_append
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_left
#align list.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right List.append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right
#align list.append_eq_nil List.append_eq_nil
-- Porting note: in Batteries
#align list.nil_eq_append_iff List.nil_eq_append
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias append_eq_cons_iff := append_eq_cons
#align list.append_eq_cons_iff List.append_eq_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-24")] alias cons_eq_append_iff := cons_eq_append
#align list.cons_eq_append_iff List.cons_eq_append
#align list.append_eq_append_iff List.append_eq_append_iff
#align list.take_append_drop List.take_append_drop
#align list.append_inj List.append_inj
#align list.append_inj_right List.append_inj_rightₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left List.append_inj_leftₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj' List.append_inj'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_right' List.append_inj_right'ₓ -- implicits order
#align list.append_inj_left' List.append_inj_left'ₓ -- implicits order
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_left_cancel := append_cancel_left
#align list.append_left_cancel List.append_cancel_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-18")] alias append_right_cancel := append_cancel_right
#align list.append_right_cancel List.append_cancel_right
@[simp] theorem append_left_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [← append_left_inj (s₁ := x), nil_append]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_left {x y : List α} : y = x ++ y ↔ x = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_left_eq_self]
@[simp] theorem append_right_eq_self {x y : List α} : x ++ y = x ↔ y = [] := by
rw [← append_right_inj (t₁ := y), append_nil]
@[simp] theorem self_eq_append_right {x y : List α} : x = x ++ y ↔ y = [] := by
rw [eq_comm, append_right_eq_self]
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
#align list.append_right_injective List.append_right_injective
#align list.append_right_inj List.append_right_inj
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
#align list.append_left_injective List.append_left_injective
#align list.append_left_inj List.append_left_inj
#align list.map_eq_append_split List.map_eq_append_split
/-! ### replicate -/
@[simp] lemma replicate_zero (a : α) : replicate 0 a = [] := rfl
#align list.replicate_zero List.replicate_zero
attribute [simp] replicate_succ
#align list.replicate_succ List.replicate_succ
lemma replicate_one (a : α) : replicate 1 a = [a] := rfl
#align list.replicate_one List.replicate_one
#align list.length_replicate List.length_replicate
#align list.mem_replicate List.mem_replicate
#align list.eq_of_mem_replicate List.eq_of_mem_replicate
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length]
#align list.eq_replicate_length List.eq_replicate_length
#align list.eq_replicate_of_mem List.eq_replicate_of_mem
#align list.eq_replicate List.eq_replicate
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
induction m <;> simp [*, succ_add, replicate]
#align list.replicate_add List.replicate_add
theorem replicate_succ' (n) (a : α) : replicate (n + 1) a = replicate n a ++ [a] :=
replicate_add n 1 a
#align list.replicate_succ' List.replicate_succ'
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
#align list.replicate_subset_singleton List.replicate_subset_singleton
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
#align list.subset_singleton_iff List.subset_singleton_iff
@[simp] theorem map_replicate (f : α → β) (n) (a : α) :
map f (replicate n a) = replicate n (f a) := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, map]]
#align list.map_replicate List.map_replicate
@[simp] theorem tail_replicate (a : α) (n) :
tail (replicate n a) = replicate (n - 1) a := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.tail_replicate List.tail_replicate
@[simp] theorem join_replicate_nil (n : ℕ) : join (replicate n []) = @nil α := by
induction n <;> [rfl; simp only [*, replicate, join, append_nil]]
#align list.join_replicate_nil List.join_replicate_nil
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
#align list.replicate_right_injective List.replicate_right_injective
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_right_inj List.replicate_right_inj
@[simp] theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
#align list.replicate_right_inj' List.replicate_right_inj'
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate · a)
#align list.replicate_left_injective List.replicate_left_injective
@[simp] theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
#align list.replicate_left_inj List.replicate_left_inj
@[simp] theorem head_replicate (n : ℕ) (a : α) (h) : head (replicate n a) h = a := by
cases n <;> simp at h ⊢
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
#align list.mem_pure List.mem_pure
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_bind {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.bind f :=
rfl
#align list.bind_eq_bind List.bind_eq_bind
#align list.bind_append List.append_bind
/-! ### concat -/
#align list.concat_nil List.concat_nil
#align list.concat_cons List.concat_cons
#align list.concat_eq_append List.concat_eq_append
#align list.init_eq_of_concat_eq List.init_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.last_eq_of_concat_eq List.last_eq_of_concat_eq
#align list.concat_ne_nil List.concat_ne_nil
#align list.concat_append List.concat_append
#align list.length_concat List.length_concat
#align list.append_concat List.append_concat
/-! ### reverse -/
#align list.reverse_nil List.reverse_nil
#align list.reverse_core List.reverseAux
-- Porting note: Do we need this?
attribute [local simp] reverseAux
#align list.reverse_cons List.reverse_cons
#align list.reverse_core_eq List.reverseAux_eq
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
#align list.reverse_cons' List.reverse_cons'
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.reverse_singleton List.reverse_singleton
#align list.reverse_append List.reverse_append
#align list.reverse_concat List.reverse_concat
#align list.reverse_reverse List.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
#align list.reverse_involutive List.reverse_involutive
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
#align list.reverse_injective List.reverse_injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
#align list.reverse_surjective List.reverse_surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
#align list.reverse_bijective List.reverse_bijective
@[simp]
theorem reverse_inj {l₁ l₂ : List α} : reverse l₁ = reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
reverse_injective.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_inj List.reverse_inj
theorem reverse_eq_iff {l l' : List α} : l.reverse = l' ↔ l = l'.reverse :=
reverse_involutive.eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_iff List.reverse_eq_iff
#align list.reverse_eq_nil List.reverse_eq_nil_iff
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
#align list.concat_eq_reverse_cons List.concat_eq_reverse_cons
#align list.length_reverse List.length_reverse
-- Porting note: This one was @[simp] in mathlib 3,
-- but Lean contains a competing simp lemma reverse_map.
-- For now we remove @[simp] to avoid simplification loops.
-- TODO: Change Lean lemma to match mathlib 3?
theorem map_reverse (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f (reverse l) = reverse (map f l) :=
(reverse_map f l).symm
#align list.map_reverse List.map_reverse
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
#align list.map_reverse_core List.map_reverseAux
#align list.mem_reverse List.mem_reverse
@[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
eq_replicate.2
⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
#align list.reverse_replicate List.reverse_replicate
/-! ### empty -/
-- Porting note: this does not work as desired
-- attribute [simp] List.isEmpty
theorem isEmpty_iff_eq_nil {l : List α} : l.isEmpty ↔ l = [] := by cases l <;> simp [isEmpty]
#align list.empty_iff_eq_nil List.isEmpty_iff_eq_nil
/-! ### dropLast -/
#align list.length_init List.length_dropLast
/-! ### getLast -/
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons {a : α} {l : List α} :
∀ h : l ≠ nil, getLast (a :: l) (cons_ne_nil a l) = getLast l h := by
induction l <;> intros
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.last_cons List.getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l _ (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp only [getLast_append]
#align list.last_append_singleton List.getLast_append_singleton
-- Porting note: name should be fixed upstream
theorem getLast_append' (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_ne_nil_right l₁ l₂ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction' l₁ with _ _ ih
· simp
· simp only [cons_append]
rw [List.getLast_cons]
exact ih
#align list.last_append List.getLast_append'
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (concat_ne_nil a l) = a :=
getLast_concat ..
#align list.last_concat List.getLast_concat'
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
#align list.last_singleton List.getLast_singleton'
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
#align list.last_cons_cons List.getLast_cons_cons
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], h => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
#align list.init_append_last List.dropLast_append_getLast
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
#align list.last_congr List.getLast_congr
#align list.last_mem List.getLast_mem
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_succ (length_replicate _ _)) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
#align list.last_replicate_succ List.getLast_replicate_succ
/-! ### getLast? -/
-- Porting note: Moved earlier in file, for use in subsequent lemmas.
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_cons_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) :
getLast? (a :: b :: l) = getLast? (b :: l) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isNone : ∀ {l : List α}, (getLast? l).isNone ↔ l = []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isNone (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_none List.getLast?_isNone
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_isSome : ∀ {l : List α}, l.getLast?.isSome ↔ l ≠ []
| [] => by simp
| [a] => by simp
| a :: b :: l => by simp [@getLast?_isSome (b :: l)]
#align list.last'_is_some List.getLast?_isSome
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
#align list.mem_last'_eq_last List.mem_getLast?_eq_getLast
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
#align list.last'_eq_last_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
#align list.mem_last'_cons List.mem_getLast?_cons
theorem mem_of_mem_getLast? {l : List α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ l.getLast?) : a ∈ l :=
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := mem_getLast?_eq_getLast ha
h₂.symm ▸ getLast_mem _
#align list.mem_of_mem_last' List.mem_of_mem_getLast?
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
#align list.init_append_last' List.dropLast_append_getLast?
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [a] => rfl
| [a, b] => rfl
| [a, b, c] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
#align list.ilast_eq_last' List.getLastI_eq_getLast?
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], a, l₂ => rfl
| [b], a, l₂ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
#align list.last'_append_cons List.getLast?_append_cons
#align list.last'_cons_cons List.getLast?_cons_cons
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
#align list.last'_append_of_ne_nil List.getLast?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem getLast?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
#align list.last'_append List.getLast?_append
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head_eq_head' List.head!_eq_head?
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_head List.surjective_head!
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
#align list.surjective_head' List.surjective_head?
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
#align list.surjective_tail List.surjective_tail
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
#align list.eq_cons_of_mem_head' List.eq_cons_of_mem_head?
theorem mem_of_mem_head? {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l.head?) : x ∈ l :=
(eq_cons_of_mem_head? h).symm ▸ mem_cons_self _ _
#align list.mem_of_mem_head' List.mem_of_mem_head?
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
#align list.head_cons List.head!_cons
#align list.tail_nil List.tail_nil
#align list.tail_cons List.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
#align list.head_append List.head!_append
theorem head?_append {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) : x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
#align list.head'_append List.head?_append
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
#align list.head'_append_of_ne_nil List.head?_append_of_ne_nil
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
· contradiction
· rw [tail, cons_append, tail]
#align list.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil
theorem cons_head?_tail : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ head? l → a :: tail l = l
| [], a, h => by contradiction
| b :: l, a, h => by
simp? at h says simp only [head?_cons, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at h
simp [h]
#align list.cons_head'_tail List.cons_head?_tail
theorem head!_mem_head? [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → head! l ∈ head? l
| [], h => by contradiction
| a :: l, _ => rfl
#align list.head_mem_head' List.head!_mem_head?
theorem cons_head!_tail [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []) : head! l :: tail l = l :=
cons_head?_tail (head!_mem_head? h)
#align list.cons_head_tail List.cons_head!_tail
theorem head!_mem_self [Inhabited α] {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) : l.head! ∈ l := by
have h' := mem_cons_self l.head! l.tail
rwa [cons_head!_tail h] at h'
#align list.head_mem_self List.head!_mem_self
theorem head_mem {l : List α} : ∀ (h : l ≠ nil), l.head h ∈ l := by
cases l <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head?_map (f : α → β) (l) : head? (map f l) = (head? l).map f := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.head'_map List.head?_map
theorem tail_append_of_ne_nil (l l' : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : (l ++ l').tail = l.tail ++ l' := by
cases l
· contradiction
· simp
#align list.tail_append_of_ne_nil List.tail_append_of_ne_nil
#align list.nth_le_eq_iff List.get_eq_iff
theorem get_eq_get? (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) :
l.get i = (l.get? i).get (by simp [get?_eq_get]) := by
simp [get_eq_iff]
#align list.some_nth_le_eq List.get?_eq_get
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false -- TODO(Mario): make replacements for theorems in this section
/-- nth element of a list `l` given `n < l.length`. -/
@[deprecated get (since := "2023-01-05")]
def nthLe (l : List α) (n) (h : n < l.length) : α := get l ⟨n, h⟩
#align list.nth_le List.nthLe
@[simp] theorem nthLe_tail (l : List α) (i) (h : i < l.tail.length)
(h' : i + 1 < l.length := (by simp only [length_tail] at h; omega)) :
l.tail.nthLe i h = l.nthLe (i + 1) h' := by
cases l <;> [cases h; rfl]
#align list.nth_le_tail List.nthLe_tail
theorem nthLe_cons_aux {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : n < (a :: l).length) :
n - 1 < l.length := by
contrapose! h
rw [length_cons]
omega
#align list.nth_le_cons_aux List.nthLe_cons_aux
theorem nthLe_cons {l : List α} {a : α} {n} (hl) :
(a :: l).nthLe n hl = if hn : n = 0 then a else l.nthLe (n - 1) (nthLe_cons_aux hn hl) := by
split_ifs with h
· simp [nthLe, h]
cases l
· rw [length_singleton, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hl
omega
cases n
· contradiction
rfl
#align list.nth_le_cons List.nthLe_cons
end deprecated
-- Porting note: List.modifyHead has @[simp], and Lean 4 treats this as
-- an invitation to unfold modifyHead in any context,
-- not just use the equational lemmas.
-- @[simp]
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem modifyHead_modifyHead (l : List α) (f g : α → α) :
(l.modifyHead f).modifyHead g = l.modifyHead (g ∘ f) := by cases l <;> simp
#align list.modify_head_modify_head List.modifyHead_modifyHead
/-! ### Induction from the right -/
/-- Induction principle from the right for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, and
for `l ++ [a]` if it holds for `l`, then it holds for all lists. The principle is given for
a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def reverseRecOn {motive : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) : motive l :=
match h : reverse l with
| [] => cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
nil
| head :: tail =>
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simpa using congr(reverse $h.symm)) <|
append_singleton _ head <| reverseRecOn (reverse tail) nil append_singleton
termination_by l.length
decreasing_by
simp_wf
rw [← length_reverse l, h, length_cons]
simp [Nat.lt_succ]
#align list.reverse_rec_on List.reverseRecOn
@[simp]
theorem reverseRecOn_nil {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn [] nil append_singleton = nil := reverseRecOn.eq_1 ..
-- `unusedHavesSuffices` is getting confused by the unfolding of `reverseRecOn`
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem reverseRecOn_concat {motive : List α → Sort*} (x : α) (xs : List α) (nil : motive [])
(append_singleton : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), motive l → motive (l ++ [a])) :
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
append_singleton _ _ (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) xs nil append_singleton) := by
suffices ∀ ys (h : reverse (reverse xs) = ys),
reverseRecOn (motive := motive) (xs ++ [x]) nil append_singleton =
cast (by simp [(reverse_reverse _).symm.trans h])
(append_singleton _ x (reverseRecOn (motive := motive) ys nil append_singleton)) by
exact this _ (reverse_reverse xs)
intros ys hy
conv_lhs => unfold reverseRecOn
split
next h => simp at h
next heq =>
revert heq
simp only [reverse_append, reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append, cons.injEq]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
subst ys
rfl
/-- Bidirectional induction principle for lists: if a property holds for the empty list, the
singleton list, and `a :: (l ++ [b])` from `l`, then it holds for all lists. This can be used to
prove statements about palindromes. The principle is given for a `Sort`-valued predicate, i.e., it
can also be used to construct data. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def bidirectionalRec {motive : List α → Sort*} (nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
∀ l, motive l
| [] => nil
| [a] => singleton a
| a :: b :: l =>
let l' := dropLast (b :: l)
let b' := getLast (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
cast (by rw [← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)]) <|
cons_append a l' b' (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l')
termination_by l => l.length
#align list.bidirectional_rec List.bidirectionalRecₓ -- universe order
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_nil {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [] = nil := bidirectionalRec.eq_1 ..
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_singleton {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b]))) (a : α):
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append [a] = singleton a := by
simp [bidirectionalRec]
@[simp]
theorem bidirectionalRec_cons_append {motive : List α → Sort*}
(nil : motive []) (singleton : ∀ a : α, motive [a])
(cons_append : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), motive l → motive (a :: (l ++ [b])))
(a : α) (l : List α) (b : α) :
bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append (a :: (l ++ [b])) =
cons_append a l b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append l) := by
conv_lhs => unfold bidirectionalRec
cases l with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs =>
simp only [List.cons_append]
dsimp only [← List.cons_append]
suffices ∀ (ys init : List α) (hinit : init = ys) (last : α) (hlast : last = b),
(cons_append a init last
(bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append init)) =
cast (congr_arg motive <| by simp [hinit, hlast])
(cons_append a ys b (bidirectionalRec nil singleton cons_append ys)) by
rw [this (x :: xs) _ (by rw [dropLast_append_cons, dropLast_single, append_nil]) _ (by simp)]
simp
rintro ys init rfl last rfl
rfl
/-- Like `bidirectionalRec`, but with the list parameter placed first. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
abbrev bidirectionalRecOn {C : List α → Sort*} (l : List α) (H0 : C []) (H1 : ∀ a : α, C [a])
(Hn : ∀ (a : α) (l : List α) (b : α), C l → C (a :: (l ++ [b]))) : C l :=
bidirectionalRec H0 H1 Hn l
#align list.bidirectional_rec_on List.bidirectionalRecOn
/-! ### sublists -/
attribute [refl] List.Sublist.refl
#align list.nil_sublist List.nil_sublist
#align list.sublist.refl List.Sublist.refl
#align list.sublist.trans List.Sublist.trans
#align list.sublist_cons List.sublist_cons
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist List.sublist_of_cons_sublist
theorem Sublist.cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ :=
Sublist.cons₂ _ s
#align list.sublist.cons_cons List.Sublist.cons_cons
#align list.sublist_append_left List.sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist_append_right List.sublist_append_right
theorem sublist_cons_of_sublist (a : α) (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁ <+ a :: l₂ := h.cons _
#align list.sublist_cons_of_sublist List.sublist_cons_of_sublist
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_left List.sublist_append_of_sublist_left
#align list.sublist_append_of_sublist_right List.sublist_append_of_sublist_right
theorem tail_sublist : ∀ l : List α, tail l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a::l => sublist_cons a l
#align list.tail_sublist List.tail_sublist
@[gcongr] protected theorem Sublist.tail : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → tail l₁ <+ tail l₂
| _, _, slnil => .slnil
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ h => (tail_sublist _).trans h
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ _ h => h
theorem Sublist.of_cons_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} {a b : α} (h : a :: l₁ <+ b :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.tail
#align list.sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons List.Sublist.of_cons_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")]
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist_cons {a} (h : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ := h.of_cons_cons
attribute [simp] cons_sublist_cons
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-07")] alias cons_sublist_cons_iff := cons_sublist_cons
#align list.cons_sublist_cons_iff List.cons_sublist_cons_iff
#align list.append_sublist_append_left List.append_sublist_append_left
#align list.sublist.append_right List.Sublist.append_right
#align list.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist List.sublist_or_mem_of_sublist
#align list.sublist.reverse List.Sublist.reverse
#align list.reverse_sublist_iff List.reverse_sublist
#align list.append_sublist_append_right List.append_sublist_append_right
#align list.sublist.append List.Sublist.append
#align list.sublist.subset List.Sublist.subset
#align list.singleton_sublist List.singleton_sublist
theorem eq_nil_of_sublist_nil {l : List α} (s : l <+ []) : l = [] :=
eq_nil_of_subset_nil <| s.subset
#align list.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil List.eq_nil_of_sublist_nil
-- Porting note: this lemma seems to have been renamed on the occasion of its move to Batteries
alias sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil := sublist_nil
#align list.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil List.sublist_nil_iff_eq_nil
@[simp] lemma sublist_singleton {l : List α} {a : α} : l <+ [a] ↔ l = [] ∨ l = [a] := by
constructor <;> rintro (_ | _) <;> aesop
#align list.replicate_sublist_replicate List.replicate_sublist_replicate
theorem sublist_replicate_iff {l : List α} {a : α} {n : ℕ} :
l <+ replicate n a ↔ ∃ k ≤ n, l = replicate k a :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨l.length, h.length_le.trans_eq (length_replicate _ _),
eq_replicate_length.mpr fun b hb => eq_of_mem_replicate (h.subset hb)⟩,
by rintro ⟨k, h, rfl⟩; exact (replicate_sublist_replicate _).mpr h⟩
#align list.sublist_replicate_iff List.sublist_replicate_iff
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length List.Sublist.eq_of_length
#align list.sublist.eq_of_length_le List.Sublist.eq_of_length_le
theorem Sublist.antisymm (s₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (s₂ : l₂ <+ l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s₁.eq_of_length_le s₂.length_le
#align list.sublist.antisymm List.Sublist.antisymm
instance decidableSublist [DecidableEq α] : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂)
| [], _ => isTrue <| nil_sublist _
| _ :: _, [] => isFalse fun h => List.noConfusion <| eq_nil_of_sublist_nil h
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ =>
if h : a = b then
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist l₁ l₂) <| h ▸ cons_sublist_cons.symm
else
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (decidableSublist (a :: l₁) l₂)
⟨sublist_cons_of_sublist _, fun s =>
match a, l₁, s, h with
| _, _, Sublist.cons _ s', h => s'
| _, _, Sublist.cons₂ t _, h => absurd rfl h⟩
#align list.decidable_sublist List.decidableSublist
/-! ### indexOf -/
section IndexOf
variable [DecidableEq α]
#align list.index_of_nil List.indexOf_nil
/-
Porting note: The following proofs were simpler prior to the port. These proofs use the low-level
`findIdx.go`.
* `indexOf_cons_self`
* `indexOf_cons_eq`
* `indexOf_cons_ne`
* `indexOf_cons`
The ported versions of the earlier proofs are given in comments.
-/
-- indexOf_cons_eq _ rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : indexOf a (a :: l) = 0 := by
rw [indexOf, findIdx_cons, beq_self_eq_true, cond]
#align list.index_of_cons_self List.indexOf_cons_self
-- fun e => if_pos e
theorem indexOf_cons_eq {a b : α} (l : List α) : b = a → indexOf a (b :: l) = 0
| e => by rw [← e]; exact indexOf_cons_self b l
#align list.index_of_cons_eq List.indexOf_cons_eq
-- fun n => if_neg n
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_cons_ne {a b : α} (l : List α) : b ≠ a → indexOf a (b :: l) = succ (indexOf a l)
| h => by simp only [indexOf, findIdx_cons, Bool.cond_eq_ite, beq_iff_eq, h, ite_false]
#align list.index_of_cons_ne List.indexOf_cons_ne
#align list.index_of_cons List.indexOf_cons
theorem indexOf_eq_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l = length l ↔ a ∉ l := by
induction' l with b l ih
· exact iff_of_true rfl (not_mem_nil _)
simp only [length, mem_cons, indexOf_cons, eq_comm]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split_ifs with h <;> simp at h
· exact iff_of_false (by rintro ⟨⟩) fun H => H <| Or.inl h.symm
· simp only [Ne.symm h, false_or_iff]
rw [← ih]
exact succ_inj'
#align list.index_of_eq_length List.indexOf_eq_length
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_of_not_mem {l : List α} {a : α} : a ∉ l → indexOf a l = length l :=
indexOf_eq_length.2
#align list.index_of_of_not_mem List.indexOf_of_not_mem
theorem indexOf_le_length {a : α} {l : List α} : indexOf a l ≤ length l := by
induction' l with b l ih; · rfl
simp only [length, indexOf_cons, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
by_cases h : b = a
· rw [if_pos h]; exact Nat.zero_le _
· rw [if_neg h]; exact succ_le_succ ih
#align list.index_of_le_length List.indexOf_le_length
theorem indexOf_lt_length {a} {l : List α} : indexOf a l < length l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun h => Decidable.by_contradiction fun al => Nat.ne_of_lt h <| indexOf_eq_length.2 al,
fun al => (lt_of_le_of_ne indexOf_le_length) fun h => indexOf_eq_length.1 h al⟩
#align list.index_of_lt_length List.indexOf_lt_length
theorem indexOf_append_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ l₁) : indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = indexOf a l₁ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· exfalso
exact not_mem_nil a h
rw [List.cons_append]
by_cases hh : d₁ = a
· iterate 2 rw [indexOf_cons_eq _ hh]
rw [indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, indexOf_cons_ne _ hh, ih (mem_of_ne_of_mem (Ne.symm hh) h)]
#align list.index_of_append_of_mem List.indexOf_append_of_mem
theorem indexOf_append_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ l₁) :
indexOf a (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁.length + indexOf a l₂ := by
induction' l₁ with d₁ t₁ ih
· rw [List.nil_append, List.length, Nat.zero_add]
rw [List.cons_append, indexOf_cons_ne _ (ne_of_not_mem_cons h).symm, List.length,
ih (not_mem_of_not_mem_cons h), Nat.succ_add]
#align list.index_of_append_of_not_mem List.indexOf_append_of_not_mem
end IndexOf
/-! ### nth element -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated get_of_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
let ⟨i, h⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨i.1, i.2, h⟩
#align list.nth_le_of_mem List.nthLe_of_mem
@[deprecated get?_eq_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_get? {l : List α} {n} (h) : get? l n = some (nthLe l n h) := get?_eq_get _
#align list.nth_le_nth List.nthLe_get?
#align list.nth_len_le List.get?_len_le
@[simp]
theorem get?_length (l : List α) : l.get? l.length = none := get?_len_le le_rfl
#align list.nth_length List.get?_length
#align list.nth_eq_some List.get?_eq_some
#align list.nth_eq_none_iff List.get?_eq_none
#align list.nth_of_mem List.get?_of_mem
@[deprecated get_mem (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_mem (l : List α) (n h) : nthLe l n h ∈ l := get_mem ..
#align list.nth_le_mem List.nthLe_mem
#align list.nth_mem List.get?_mem
@[deprecated mem_iff_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem mem_iff_nthLe {a} {l : List α} : a ∈ l ↔ ∃ n h, nthLe l n h = a :=
mem_iff_get.trans ⟨fun ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩ => ⟨n, h, e⟩, fun ⟨n, h, e⟩ => ⟨⟨n, h⟩, e⟩⟩
#align list.mem_iff_nth_le List.mem_iff_nthLe
#align list.mem_iff_nth List.mem_iff_get?
#align list.nth_zero List.get?_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-03")] alias get?_injective := get?_inj
#align list.nth_injective List.get?_inj
#align list.nth_map List.get?_map
@[deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map (f : α → β) {l n} (H1 H2) : nthLe (map f l) n H1 = f (nthLe l n H2) := get_map ..
#align list.nth_le_map List.nthLe_map
/-- A version of `get_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
theorem get_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} :
f (get l n) = get (map f l) ⟨n.1, (l.length_map f).symm ▸ n.2⟩ := Eq.symm (get_map _)
/-- A version of `nthLe_map` that can be used for rewriting. -/
@[deprecated get_map_rev (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map_rev (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
f (nthLe l n H) = nthLe (map f l) n ((l.length_map f).symm ▸ H) :=
(nthLe_map f _ _).symm
#align list.nth_le_map_rev List.nthLe_map_rev
@[simp, deprecated get_map (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_map' (f : α → β) {l n} (H) :
nthLe (map f l) n H = f (nthLe l n (l.length_map f ▸ H)) := nthLe_map f _ _
#align list.nth_le_map' List.nthLe_map'
#align list.nth_le_of_eq List.get_of_eq
@[simp, deprecated get_singleton (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_singleton (a : α) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < 1) : nthLe [a] n hn = a := get_singleton ..
#align list.nth_le_singleton List.get_singleton
#align list.nth_le_zero List.get_mk_zero
#align list.nth_le_append List.get_append
@[deprecated get_append_right' (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : ℕ} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).nthLe n h₂ = l₂.nthLe (n - l₁.length) (get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂) :=
get_append_right' h₁ h₂
#align list.nth_le_append_right_aux List.get_append_right_aux
#align list.nth_le_append_right List.nthLe_append_right
#align list.nth_le_replicate List.get_replicate
#align list.nth_append List.get?_append
#align list.nth_append_right List.get?_append_right
#align list.last_eq_nth_le List.getLast_eq_get
theorem get_length_sub_one {l : List α} (h : l.length - 1 < l.length) :
l.get ⟨l.length - 1, h⟩ = l.getLast (by rintro rfl; exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 h) :=
(getLast_eq_get l _).symm
#align list.nth_le_length_sub_one List.get_length_sub_one
#align list.nth_concat_length List.get?_concat_length
@[deprecated get_cons_length (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_cons_length : ∀ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : ℕ) (h : n = xs.length),
(x :: xs).nthLe n (by simp [h]) = (x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs) := get_cons_length
#align list.nth_le_cons_length List.nthLe_cons_length
theorem take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length {l : List α} {n : ℕ} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.drop n).take 1 = [l.get ⟨n, h⟩] := by
rw [drop_eq_get_cons h, take, take]
#align list.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length List.take_one_drop_eq_of_lt_length
#align list.ext List.ext
-- TODO one may rename ext in the standard library, and it is also not clear
-- which of ext_get?, ext_get?', ext_get should be @[ext], if any
alias ext_get? := ext
theorem ext_get?' {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h' : ∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) :
l₁ = l₂ := by
apply ext
intro n
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge n <| max l₁.length l₂.length with hn | hn
· exact h' n hn
· simp_all [Nat.max_le, get?_eq_none.mpr]
theorem ext_get?_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔ ∀ n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _; rfl, ext_get?⟩
theorem ext_get_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁ = l₂ ↔ l₁.length = l₂.length ∧ ∀ n h₁ h₂, get l₁ ⟨n, h₁⟩ = get l₂ ⟨n, h₂⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, fun _ _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
· intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact ext_get h₁ h₂
theorem ext_get?_iff' {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ = l₂ ↔
∀ n < max l₁.length l₂.length, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n :=
⟨by rintro rfl _ _; rfl, ext_get?'⟩
@[deprecated ext_get (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem ext_nthLe {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hl : length l₁ = length l₂)
(h : ∀ n h₁ h₂, nthLe l₁ n h₁ = nthLe l₂ n h₂) : l₁ = l₂ :=
ext_get hl h
#align list.ext_le List.ext_nthLe
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α} (h), get l ⟨indexOf a l, h⟩ = a
| b :: l, h => by
by_cases h' : b = a <;>
simp only [h', if_pos, if_false, indexOf_cons, get, @indexOf_get _ _ l, cond_eq_if, beq_iff_eq]
#align list.index_of_nth_le List.indexOf_get
@[simp]
theorem indexOf_get? [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
get? l (indexOf a l) = some a := by rw [get?_eq_get, indexOf_get (indexOf_lt_length.2 h)]
#align list.index_of_nth List.indexOf_get?
@[deprecated (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem get_reverse_aux₁ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i h1 h2), get (reverseAux l r) ⟨i + length l, h1⟩ = get r ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i => fun h1 _ => rfl
| a :: l, r, i => by
rw [show i + length (a :: l) = i + 1 + length l from Nat.add_right_comm i (length l) 1]
exact fun h1 h2 => get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) (i + 1) h1 (succ_lt_succ h2)
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux1 List.get_reverse_aux₁
theorem indexOf_inj [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
indexOf x l = indexOf y l ↔ x = y :=
⟨fun h => by
have x_eq_y :
get l ⟨indexOf x l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hx⟩ =
get l ⟨indexOf y l, indexOf_lt_length.2 hy⟩ := by
simp only [h]
simp only [indexOf_get] at x_eq_y; exact x_eq_y, fun h => by subst h; rfl⟩
#align list.index_of_inj List.indexOf_inj
theorem get_reverse_aux₂ :
∀ (l r : List α) (i : Nat) (h1) (h2),
get (reverseAux l r) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩
| [], r, i, h1, h2 => absurd h2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| a :: l, r, 0, h1, _ => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₁ l (a :: r) 0
rw [Nat.zero_add] at aux
exact aux _ (zero_lt_succ _)
| a :: l, r, i + 1, h1, h2 => by
have aux := get_reverse_aux₂ l (a :: r) i
have heq : length (a :: l) - 1 - (i + 1) = length l - 1 - i := by rw [length]; omega
rw [← heq] at aux
apply aux
#align list.nth_le_reverse_aux2 List.get_reverse_aux₂
@[simp] theorem get_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
get (reverse l) ⟨length l - 1 - i, h1⟩ = get l ⟨i, h2⟩ :=
get_reverse_aux₂ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp, deprecated get_reverse (since := "2023-01-05")]
theorem nthLe_reverse (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h1 h2) :
nthLe (reverse l) (length l - 1 - i) h1 = nthLe l i h2 :=
get_reverse ..
#align list.nth_le_reverse List.nthLe_reverse
theorem nthLe_reverse' (l : List α) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.reverse.length) (hn') :
l.reverse.nthLe n hn = l.nthLe (l.length - 1 - n) hn' := by
rw [eq_comm]
convert nthLe_reverse l.reverse n (by simpa) hn using 1
simp
#align list.nth_le_reverse' List.nthLe_reverse'
theorem get_reverse' (l : List α) (n) (hn') :
l.reverse.get n = l.get ⟨l.length - 1 - n, hn'⟩ := nthLe_reverse' ..
-- FIXME: prove it the other way around
attribute [deprecated get_reverse' (since := "2023-01-05")] nthLe_reverse'
theorem eq_cons_of_length_one {l : List α} (h : l.length = 1) :
l = [l.nthLe 0 (by omega)] := by
refine ext_get (by convert h) fun n h₁ h₂ => ?_
simp only [get_singleton]
congr
omega
#align list.eq_cons_of_length_one List.eq_cons_of_length_one
end deprecated
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail {f g : List α → List α} (m : ℕ) :
∀ (n) (l : List α),
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g (m + n) =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g m) n
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, a :: l => congr_arg (List.cons a) (modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail m n l)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le {f g : List α → List α} (m n : ℕ) (l : List α)
(h : n ≤ m) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g m =
l.modifyNthTail (fun l => (f l).modifyNthTail g (m - n)) n := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.add_comm, modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_le List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le
theorem modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same {f g : List α → List α} (n : ℕ) (l : List α) :
(l.modifyNthTail f n).modifyNthTail g n = l.modifyNthTail (g ∘ f) n := by
rw [modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_le n n l (le_refl n), Nat.sub_self]; rfl
#align list.modify_nth_tail_modify_nth_tail_same List.modifyNthTail_modifyNthTail_same
#align list.modify_nth_tail_id List.modifyNthTail_id
#align list.remove_nth_eq_nth_tail List.eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
#align list.update_nth_eq_modify_nth List.set_eq_modifyNth
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-04")] alias removeNth_eq_nthTail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem modifyNth_eq_set (f : α → α) :
∀ (n) (l : List α), modifyNth f n l = ((fun a => set l n (f a)) <$> get? l n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n + 1, [] => rfl
| n + 1, b :: l =>
(congr_arg (cons b) (modifyNth_eq_set f n l)).trans <| by cases h : get? l n <;> simp [h]
#align list.modify_nth_eq_update_nth List.modifyNth_eq_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth List.get?_modifyNth
theorem length_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _ + 1, [] => rfl
| _ + 1, _ :: _ => @congr_arg _ _ _ _ (· + 1) (length_modifyNthTail _ H _ _)
#align list.modify_nth_tail_length List.length_modifyNthTail
-- Porting note: Duplicate of `modify_get?_length`
-- (but with a substantially better name?)
-- @[simp]
theorem length_modifyNth (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modify_get?_length f
#align list.modify_nth_length List.length_modifyNth
#align list.update_nth_length List.length_set
#align list.nth_modify_nth_eq List.get?_modifyNth_eq
#align list.nth_modify_nth_ne List.get?_modifyNth_ne
#align list.nth_update_nth_eq List.get?_set_eq
#align list.nth_update_nth_of_lt List.get?_set_eq_of_lt
#align list.nth_update_nth_ne List.get?_set_ne
#align list.update_nth_nil List.set_nil
#align list.update_nth_succ List.set_succ
#align list.update_nth_comm List.set_comm
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_eq List.get_set_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_set_of_ne {l : List α} {i j : ℕ} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get ⟨j, hj⟩ = l.get ⟨j, by simpa using hj⟩ := by
rw [← Option.some_inj, ← List.get?_eq_get, List.get?_set_ne _ _ h, List.get?_eq_get]
#align list.nth_le_update_nth_of_ne List.get_set_of_ne
#align list.mem_or_eq_of_mem_update_nth List.mem_or_eq_of_mem_set
/-! ### map -/
#align list.map_nil List.map_nil
theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
induction l <;> simp [*]
#align list.map_eq_foldr List.map_eq_foldr
theorem map_congr {f g : α → β} : ∀ {l : List α}, (∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) → map f l = map g l
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l, h => by
let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := forall_mem_cons.1 h
rw [map, map, h₁, map_congr h₂]
#align list.map_congr List.map_congr
theorem map_eq_map_iff {f g : α → β} {l : List α} : map f l = map g l ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x := by
refine ⟨?_, map_congr⟩; intro h x hx
rw [mem_iff_get] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
rw [get_map_rev f, get_map_rev g]
congr!
#align list.map_eq_map_iff List.map_eq_map_iff
theorem map_concat (f : α → β) (a : α) (l : List α) :
map f (concat l a) = concat (map f l) (f a) := by
induction l <;> [rfl; simp only [*, concat_eq_append, cons_append, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_concat List.map_concat
#align list.map_id'' List.map_id'
theorem map_id'' {f : α → α} (h : ∀ x, f x = x) (l : List α) : map f l = l := by
simp [show f = id from funext h]
#align list.map_id' List.map_id''
theorem eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil {f : α → β} {l : List α} (h : map f l = nil) : l = nil :=
eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero <| by rw [← length_map l f, h]; rfl
#align list.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil List.eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (L : List (List α)) : map f (join L) = join (map (map f) L) := by
induction L <;> [rfl; simp only [*, join, map, map_append]]
#align list.map_join List.map_join
theorem bind_pure_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (pure ∘ f) = map f l :=
.symm <| map_eq_bind ..
#align list.bind_ret_eq_map List.bind_pure_eq_map
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated bind_pure_eq_map (since := "2024-03-24")]
theorem bind_ret_eq_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.bind (List.ret ∘ f) = map f l :=
bind_pure_eq_map f l
theorem bind_congr {l : List α} {f g : α → List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, f x = g x) :
List.bind l f = List.bind l g :=
(congr_arg List.join <| map_congr h : _)
#align list.bind_congr List.bind_congr
theorem infix_bind_of_mem {a : α} {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) (f : α → List α) :
f a <:+: as.bind f :=
List.infix_of_mem_join (List.mem_map_of_mem f h)
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_map {α β} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : f <$> l = map f l :=
rfl
#align list.map_eq_map List.map_eq_map
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (f : α → β) (l) : map f (tail l) = tail (map f l) := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.map_tail List.map_tail
/-- A single `List.map` of a composition of functions is equal to
composing a `List.map` with another `List.map`, fully applied.
This is the reverse direction of `List.map_map`.
-/
theorem comp_map (h : β → γ) (g : α → β) (l : List α) : map (h ∘ g) l = map h (map g l) :=
(map_map _ _ _).symm
#align list.comp_map List.comp_map
/-- Composing a `List.map` with another `List.map` is equal to
a single `List.map` of composed functions.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_map (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) : map g ∘ map f = map (g ∘ f) := by
ext l; rw [comp_map, Function.comp_apply]
#align list.map_comp_map List.map_comp_map
section map_bijectivity
theorem _root_.Function.LeftInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : LeftInverse f g) :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g)
| [] => by simp_rw [map_nil]
| x :: xs => by simp_rw [map_cons, h x, h.list_map xs]
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.RightInverse.list_map {f : α → β} {g : β → α}
(h : RightInverse f g) : RightInverse (map f) (map g) :=
h.list_map
nonrec theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.list_map {f : α → α}
(h : Involutive f) : Involutive (map f) :=
Function.LeftInverse.list_map h
@[simp]
theorem map_leftInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
LeftInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ LeftInverse f g :=
⟨fun h x => by injection h [x], (·.list_map)⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_rightInverse_iff {f : α → β} {g : β → α} :
RightInverse (map f) (map g) ↔ RightInverse f g := map_leftInverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_involutive_iff {f : α → α} :
Involutive (map f) ↔ Involutive f := map_leftInverse_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
Injective (map f)
| [], [], _ => rfl
| x :: xs, y :: ys, hxy => by
injection hxy with hxy hxys
rw [h hxy, h.list_map hxys]
@[simp]
theorem map_injective_iff {f : α → β} : Injective (map f) ↔ Injective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x y hxy => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this
apply h
simp [hxy]
#align list.map_injective_iff List.map_injective_iff
theorem _root_.Function.Surjective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) :
Surjective (map f) :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := h.hasRightInverse; h.list_map.surjective
@[simp]
theorem map_surjective_iff {f : α → β} : Surjective (map f) ↔ Surjective f := by
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, (·.list_map)⟩
let ⟨[y], hxy⟩ := h [x]
exact ⟨_, List.singleton_injective hxy⟩
theorem _root_.Function.Bijective.list_map {f : α → β} (h : Bijective f) : Bijective (map f) :=
⟨h.1.list_map, h.2.list_map⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_bijective_iff {f : α → β} : Bijective (map f) ↔ Bijective f := by
simp_rw [Function.Bijective, map_injective_iff, map_surjective_iff]
end map_bijectivity
theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) :
map f (filter p as) = foldr (fun a bs => bif p a then f a :: bs else bs) [] as := by
induction' as with head tail
· rfl
· simp only [foldr]
cases hp : p head <;> simp [filter, *]
#align list.map_filter_eq_foldr List.map_filter_eq_foldr
theorem getLast_map (f : α → β) {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
(l.map f).getLast (mt eq_nil_of_map_eq_nil hl) = f (l.getLast hl) := by
induction' l with l_hd l_tl l_ih
· apply (hl rfl).elim
· cases l_tl
· simp
· simpa using l_ih _
#align list.last_map List.getLast_map
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 1,668 | 1,670 | theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
l.map f = replicate l.length b ↔ ∀ x ∈ l, f x = b := by |
simp [eq_replicate]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
#align_import order.directed from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ffde2d8a6e689149e44fd95fa862c23a57f8c780"
/-!
# Directed indexed families and sets
This file defines directed indexed families and directed sets. An indexed family/set is
directed iff each pair of elements has a shared upper bound.
## Main declarations
* `Directed r f`: Predicate stating that the indexed family `f` is `r`-directed.
* `DirectedOn r s`: Predicate stating that the set `s` is `r`-directed.
* `IsDirected α r`: Prop-valued mixin stating that `α` is `r`-directed. Follows the style of the
unbundled relation classes such as `IsTotal`.
* `ScottContinuous`: Predicate stating that a function between preorders preserves `IsLUB` on
directed sets.
## TODO
Define connected orders (the transitive symmetric closure of `≤` is everything) and show that
(co)directed orders are connected.
## References
* [Gierz et al, *A Compendium of Continuous Lattices*][GierzEtAl1980]
-/
open Function
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} (r r' s : α → α → Prop)
/-- Local notation for a relation -/
local infixl:50 " ≼ " => r
/-- A family of elements of α is directed (with respect to a relation `≼` on α)
if there is a member of the family `≼`-above any pair in the family. -/
def Directed (f : ι → α) :=
∀ x y, ∃ z, f x ≼ f z ∧ f y ≼ f z
#align directed Directed
/-- A subset of α is directed if there is an element of the set `≼`-above any
pair of elements in the set. -/
def DirectedOn (s : Set α) :=
∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ z ∈ s, x ≼ z ∧ y ≼ z
#align directed_on DirectedOn
variable {r r'}
theorem directedOn_iff_directed {s} : @DirectedOn α r s ↔ Directed r (Subtype.val : s → α) := by
simp only [DirectedOn, Directed, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_prop, Subtype.forall]
exact forall₂_congr fun x _ => by simp [And.comm, and_assoc]
#align directed_on_iff_directed directedOn_iff_directed
alias ⟨DirectedOn.directed_val, _⟩ := directedOn_iff_directed
#align directed_on.directed_coe DirectedOn.directed_val
theorem directedOn_range {f : ι → α} : Directed r f ↔ DirectedOn r (Set.range f) := by
simp_rw [Directed, DirectedOn, Set.forall_mem_range, Set.exists_range_iff]
#align directed_on_range directedOn_range
-- Porting note: This alias was misplaced in `order/compactly_generated.lean` in mathlib3
alias ⟨Directed.directedOn_range, _⟩ := directedOn_range
#align directed.directed_on_range Directed.directedOn_range
-- Porting note: `attribute [protected]` doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] Directed.directedOn_range
theorem directedOn_image {s : Set β} {f : β → α} :
DirectedOn r (f '' s) ↔ DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o r) s := by
simp only [DirectedOn, Set.mem_image, exists_exists_and_eq_and, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, Order.Preimage]
#align directed_on_image directedOn_image
theorem DirectedOn.mono' {s : Set α} (hs : DirectedOn r s)
(h : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → r a b → r' a b) : DirectedOn r' s := fun _ hx _ hy =>
let ⟨z, hz, hxz, hyz⟩ := hs _ hx _ hy
⟨z, hz, h hx hz hxz, h hy hz hyz⟩
#align directed_on.mono' DirectedOn.mono'
theorem DirectedOn.mono {s : Set α} (h : DirectedOn r s) (H : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, r a b → r' a b) :
DirectedOn r' s :=
h.mono' fun _ _ _ _ h ↦ H h
#align directed_on.mono DirectedOn.mono
theorem directed_comp {ι} {f : ι → β} {g : β → α} : Directed r (g ∘ f) ↔ Directed (g ⁻¹'o r) f :=
Iff.rfl
#align directed_comp directed_comp
theorem Directed.mono {s : α → α → Prop} {ι} {f : ι → α} (H : ∀ a b, r a b → s a b)
(h : Directed r f) : Directed s f := fun a b =>
let ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := h a b
⟨c, H _ _ h₁, H _ _ h₂⟩
#align directed.mono Directed.mono
-- Porting note: due to some interaction with the local notation, `r` became explicit here in lean3
theorem Directed.mono_comp (r : α → α → Prop) {ι} {rb : β → β → Prop} {g : α → β} {f : ι → α}
(hg : ∀ ⦃x y⦄, r x y → rb (g x) (g y)) (hf : Directed r f) : Directed rb (g ∘ f) :=
directed_comp.2 <| hf.mono hg
#align directed.mono_comp Directed.mono_comp
/-- A set stable by supremum is `≤`-directed. -/
theorem directedOn_of_sup_mem [SemilatticeSup α] {S : Set α}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ∈ S → j ∈ S → i ⊔ j ∈ S) : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S := fun a ha b hb =>
⟨a ⊔ b, H ha hb, le_sup_left, le_sup_right⟩
#align directed_on_of_sup_mem directedOn_of_sup_mem
theorem Directed.extend_bot [Preorder α] [OrderBot α] {e : ι → β} {f : ι → α}
(hf : Directed (· ≤ ·) f) (he : Function.Injective e) :
Directed (· ≤ ·) (Function.extend e f ⊥) := by
intro a b
rcases (em (∃ i, e i = a)).symm with (ha | ⟨i, rfl⟩)
· use b
simp [Function.extend_apply' _ _ _ ha]
rcases (em (∃ i, e i = b)).symm with (hb | ⟨j, rfl⟩)
· use e i
simp [Function.extend_apply' _ _ _ hb]
rcases hf i j with ⟨k, hi, hj⟩
use e k
simp only [he.extend_apply, *, true_and_iff]
#align directed.extend_bot Directed.extend_bot
/-- A set stable by infimum is `≥`-directed. -/
theorem directedOn_of_inf_mem [SemilatticeInf α] {S : Set α}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ∈ S → j ∈ S → i ⊓ j ∈ S) : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) S :=
directedOn_of_sup_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) H
#align directed_on_of_inf_mem directedOn_of_inf_mem
theorem IsTotal.directed [IsTotal α r] (f : ι → α) : Directed r f := fun i j =>
Or.casesOn (total_of r (f i) (f j)) (fun h => ⟨j, h, refl _⟩) fun h => ⟨i, refl _, h⟩
#align is_total.directed IsTotal.directed
/-- `IsDirected α r` states that for any elements `a`, `b` there exists an element `c` such that
`r a c` and `r b c`. -/
class IsDirected (α : Type*) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop where
/-- For every pair of elements `a` and `b` there is a `c` such that `r a c` and `r b c` -/
directed (a b : α) : ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c
#align is_directed IsDirected
#align is_directed.directed IsDirected.directed
theorem directed_of (r : α → α → Prop) [IsDirected α r] (a b : α) : ∃ c, r a c ∧ r b c :=
IsDirected.directed _ _
#align directed_of directed_of
theorem directed_id [IsDirected α r] : Directed r id := directed_of r
#align directed_id directed_id
theorem directed_id_iff : Directed r id ↔ IsDirected α r :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, @directed_id _ _⟩
#align directed_id_iff directed_id_iff
theorem directedOn_univ [IsDirected α r] : DirectedOn r Set.univ := fun a _ b _ =>
let ⟨c, hc⟩ := directed_of r a b
⟨c, trivial, hc⟩
#align directed_on_univ directedOn_univ
theorem directedOn_univ_iff : DirectedOn r Set.univ ↔ IsDirected α r :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨fun a b =>
let ⟨c, _, hc⟩ := h a trivial b trivial
⟨c, hc⟩⟩,
@directedOn_univ _ _⟩
#align directed_on_univ_iff directedOn_univ_iff
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) IsTotal.to_isDirected [IsTotal α r] : IsDirected α r :=
directed_id_iff.1 <| IsTotal.directed _
#align is_total.to_is_directed IsTotal.to_isDirected
theorem isDirected_mono [IsDirected α r] (h : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, r a b → s a b) : IsDirected α s :=
⟨fun a b =>
let ⟨c, ha, hb⟩ := IsDirected.directed a b
⟨c, h ha, h hb⟩⟩
#align is_directed_mono isDirected_mono
theorem exists_ge_ge [LE α] [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] (a b : α) : ∃ c, a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :=
directed_of (· ≤ ·) a b
#align exists_ge_ge exists_ge_ge
theorem exists_le_le [LE α] [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] (a b : α) : ∃ c, c ≤ a ∧ c ≤ b :=
directed_of (· ≥ ·) a b
#align exists_le_le exists_le_le
instance OrderDual.isDirected_ge [LE α] [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] : IsDirected αᵒᵈ (· ≥ ·) := by
assumption
#align order_dual.is_directed_ge OrderDual.isDirected_ge
instance OrderDual.isDirected_le [LE α] [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] : IsDirected αᵒᵈ (· ≤ ·) := by
assumption
#align order_dual.is_directed_le OrderDual.isDirected_le
/-- A monotone function on an upwards-directed type is directed. -/
theorem directed_of_isDirected_le [LE α] [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {f : α → β} {r : β → β → Prop}
(H : ∀ ⦃i j⦄, i ≤ j → r (f i) (f j)) : Directed r f :=
directed_id.mono_comp H
#align directed_of_sup directed_of_isDirected_le
theorem Monotone.directed_le [Preorder α] [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] [Preorder β] {f : α → β} :
Monotone f → Directed (· ≤ ·) f :=
directed_of_isDirected_le
#align monotone.directed_le Monotone.directed_le
theorem Antitone.directed_ge [Preorder α] [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Antitone f) : Directed (· ≥ ·) f :=
directed_of_isDirected_le hf
#align antitone.directed_ge Antitone.directed_ge
/-- An antitone function on a downwards-directed type is directed. -/
theorem directed_of_isDirected_ge [LE α] [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {r : β → β → Prop} {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ a₁ a₂, a₁ ≤ a₂ → r (f a₂) (f a₁)) : Directed r f :=
directed_of_isDirected_le (α := αᵒᵈ) fun _ _ ↦ hf _ _
#align directed_of_inf directed_of_isDirected_ge
theorem Monotone.directed_ge [Preorder α] [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) : Directed (· ≥ ·) f :=
directed_of_isDirected_ge hf
#align monotone.directed_ge Monotone.directed_ge
theorem Antitone.directed_le [Preorder α] [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] [Preorder β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Antitone f) : Directed (· ≤ ·) f :=
directed_of_isDirected_ge hf
#align antitone.directed_le Antitone.directed_le
section Reflexive
protected theorem DirectedOn.insert (h : Reflexive r) (a : α) {s : Set α} (hd : DirectedOn r s)
(ha : ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ c ∈ s, a ≼ c ∧ b ≼ c) : DirectedOn r (insert a s) := by
rintro x (rfl | hx) y (rfl | hy)
· exact ⟨y, Set.mem_insert _ _, h _, h _⟩
· obtain ⟨w, hws, hwr⟩ := ha y hy
exact ⟨w, Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hws, hwr⟩
· obtain ⟨w, hws, hwr⟩ := ha x hx
exact ⟨w, Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hws, hwr.symm⟩
· obtain ⟨w, hws, hwr⟩ := hd x hx y hy
exact ⟨w, Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ hws, hwr⟩
#align directed_on.insert DirectedOn.insert
theorem directedOn_singleton (h : Reflexive r) (a : α) : DirectedOn r ({a} : Set α) :=
fun x hx _ hy => ⟨x, hx, h _, hx.symm ▸ hy.symm ▸ h _⟩
#align directed_on_singleton directedOn_singleton
theorem directedOn_pair (h : Reflexive r) {a b : α} (hab : a ≼ b) : DirectedOn r ({a, b} : Set α) :=
(directedOn_singleton h _).insert h _ fun c hc => ⟨c, hc, hc.symm ▸ hab, h _⟩
#align directed_on_pair directedOn_pair
| Mathlib/Order/Directed.lean | 254 | 257 | theorem directedOn_pair' (h : Reflexive r) {a b : α} (hab : a ≼ b) :
DirectedOn r ({b, a} : Set α) := by |
rw [Set.pair_comm]
apply directedOn_pair h hab
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Const
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Yoneda
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsIso
#align_import category_theory.limits.cones from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"740acc0e6f9adf4423f92a485d0456fc271482da"
/-!
# Cones and cocones
We define `Cone F`, a cone over a functor `F`,
and `F.cones : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type`, the functor associating to `X` the cones over `F` with cone point `X`.
A cone `c` is defined by specifying its cone point `c.pt` and a natural transformation `c.π`
from the constant `c.pt` valued functor to `F`.
We provide `c.w f : c.π.app j ≫ F.map f = c.π.app j'` for any `f : j ⟶ j'`
as a wrapper for `c.π.naturality f` avoiding unneeded identity morphisms.
We define `c.extend f`, where `c : cone F` and `f : Y ⟶ c.pt` for some other `Y`,
which replaces the cone point by `Y` and inserts `f` into each of the components of the cone.
Similarly we have `c.whisker F` producing a `Cone (E ⋙ F)`
We define morphisms of cones, and the category of cones.
We define `Cone.postcompose α : cone F ⥤ cone G` for `α` a natural transformation `F ⟶ G`.
And, of course, we dualise all this to cocones as well.
For more results about the category of cones, see `cone_category.lean`.
-/
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
open CategoryTheory
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
variable {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} C]
variable {D : Type u₄} [Category.{v₄} D]
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Functor
open Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Functor
variable (F : J ⥤ C)
/-- If `F : J ⥤ C` then `F.cones` is the functor assigning to an object `X : C` the
type of natural transformations from the constant functor with value `X` to `F`.
An object representing this functor is a limit of `F`.
-/
@[simps!]
def cones : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max u₁ v₃ :=
(const J).op ⋙ yoneda.obj F
#align category_theory.functor.cones CategoryTheory.Functor.cones
/-- If `F : J ⥤ C` then `F.cocones` is the functor assigning to an object `(X : C)`
the type of natural transformations from `F` to the constant functor with value `X`.
An object corepresenting this functor is a colimit of `F`.
-/
@[simps!]
def cocones : C ⥤ Type max u₁ v₃ :=
const J ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op F)
#align category_theory.functor.cocones CategoryTheory.Functor.cocones
end Functor
section
variable (J C)
/-- Functorially associated to each functor `J ⥤ C`, we have the `C`-presheaf consisting of
cones with a given cone point.
-/
@[simps!]
def cones : (J ⥤ C) ⥤ Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type max u₁ v₃ where
obj := Functor.cones
map f := whiskerLeft (const J).op (yoneda.map f)
#align category_theory.cones CategoryTheory.cones
/-- Contravariantly associated to each functor `J ⥤ C`, we have the `C`-copresheaf consisting of
cocones with a given cocone point.
-/
@[simps!]
def cocones : (J ⥤ C)ᵒᵖ ⥤ C ⥤ Type max u₁ v₃ where
obj F := Functor.cocones (unop F)
map f := whiskerLeft (const J) (coyoneda.map f)
#align category_theory.cocones CategoryTheory.cocones
end
namespace Limits
section
/-- A `c : Cone F` is:
* an object `c.pt` and
* a natural transformation `c.π : c.pt ⟶ F` from the constant `c.pt` functor to `F`.
Example: if `J` is a category coming from a poset then the data required to make
a term of type `Cone F` is morphisms `πⱼ : c.pt ⟶ F j` for all `j : J` and,
for all `i ≤ j` in `J`, morphisms `πᵢⱼ : F i ⟶ F j` such that `πᵢ ≫ πᵢⱼ = πᵢ`.
`Cone F` is equivalent, via `cone.equiv` below, to `Σ X, F.cones.obj X`.
-/
structure Cone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- An object of `C` -/
pt : C
/-- A natural transformation from the constant functor at `X` to `F` -/
π : (const J).obj pt ⟶ F
#align category_theory.limits.cone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.cone.X CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.pt
instance inhabitedCone (F : Discrete PUnit ⥤ C) : Inhabited (Cone F) :=
⟨{ pt := F.obj ⟨⟨⟩⟩
π := { app := fun ⟨⟨⟩⟩ => 𝟙 _
naturality := by
intro X Y f
match X, Y, f with
| .mk A, .mk B, .up g =>
aesop_cat
}
}⟩
#align category_theory.limits.inhabited_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.inhabitedCone
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem Cone.w {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cone F) {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
c.π.app j ≫ F.map f = c.π.app j' := by
rw [← c.π.naturality f]
apply id_comp
#align category_theory.limits.cone.w CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.w
/-- A `c : Cocone F` is
* an object `c.pt` and
* a natural transformation `c.ι : F ⟶ c.pt` from `F` to the constant `c.pt` functor.
For example, if the source `J` of `F` is a partially ordered set, then to give
`c : Cocone F` is to give a collection of morphisms `ιⱼ : F j ⟶ c.pt` and, for
all `j ≤ k` in `J`, morphisms `ιⱼₖ : F j ⟶ F k` such that `Fⱼₖ ≫ Fₖ = Fⱼ` for all `j ≤ k`.
`Cocone F` is equivalent, via `Cone.equiv` below, to `Σ X, F.cocones.obj X`.
-/
structure Cocone (F : J ⥤ C) where
/-- An object of `C` -/
pt : C
/-- A natural transformation from `F` to the constant functor at `pt` -/
ι : F ⟶ (const J).obj pt
#align category_theory.limits.cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.X CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.pt
instance inhabitedCocone (F : Discrete PUnit ⥤ C) : Inhabited (Cocone F) :=
⟨{ pt := F.obj ⟨⟨⟩⟩
ι := { app := fun ⟨⟨⟩⟩ => 𝟙 _
naturality := by
intro X Y f
match X, Y, f with
| .mk A, .mk B, .up g =>
aesop_cat
}
}⟩
#align category_theory.limits.inhabited_cocone CategoryTheory.Limits.inhabitedCocone
@[reassoc] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem Cocone.w {F : J ⥤ C} (c : Cocone F) {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f ≫ c.ι.app j' = c.ι.app j := by
rw [c.ι.naturality f]
apply comp_id
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.w CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.w
attribute [simp 1001] Cocone.w_assoc
end
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
namespace Cone
/-- The isomorphism between a cone on `F` and an element of the functor `F.cones`. -/
@[simps!]
def equiv (F : J ⥤ C) : Cone F ≅ ΣX, F.cones.obj X where
hom c := ⟨op c.pt, c.π⟩
inv c :=
{ pt := c.1.unop
π := c.2 }
hom_inv_id := by
funext X
cases X
rfl
inv_hom_id := by
funext X
cases X
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cone.equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.equiv
/-- A map to the vertex of a cone naturally induces a cone by composition. -/
@[simps]
def extensions (c : Cone F) : yoneda.obj c.pt ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁} ⟶ F.cones where
app X f := (const J).map f.down ≫ c.π
#align category_theory.limits.cone.extensions CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.extensions
/-- A map to the vertex of a cone induces a cone by composition. -/
@[simps]
def extend (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) : Cone F :=
{ pt := X
π := c.extensions.app (op X) ⟨f⟩ }
#align category_theory.limits.cone.extend CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.extend
/-- Whisker a cone by precomposition of a functor. -/
@[simps]
def whisker (E : K ⥤ J) (c : Cone F) : Cone (E ⋙ F) where
pt := c.pt
π := whiskerLeft E c.π
#align category_theory.limits.cone.whisker CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.whisker
end Cone
namespace Cocone
/-- The isomorphism between a cocone on `F` and an element of the functor `F.cocones`. -/
def equiv (F : J ⥤ C) : Cocone F ≅ ΣX, F.cocones.obj X where
hom c := ⟨c.pt, c.ι⟩
inv c :=
{ pt := c.1
ι := c.2 }
hom_inv_id := by
funext X
cases X
rfl
inv_hom_id := by
funext X
cases X
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.equiv CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.equiv
/-- A map from the vertex of a cocone naturally induces a cocone by composition. -/
@[simps]
def extensions (c : Cocone F) : coyoneda.obj (op c.pt) ⋙ uliftFunctor.{u₁} ⟶ F.cocones where
app X f := c.ι ≫ (const J).map f.down
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.extensions CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.extensions
/-- A map from the vertex of a cocone induces a cocone by composition. -/
@[simps]
def extend (c : Cocone F) {Y : C} (f : c.pt ⟶ Y) : Cocone F where
pt := Y
ι := c.extensions.app Y ⟨f⟩
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.extend CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.extend
/-- Whisker a cocone by precomposition of a functor. See `whiskering` for a functorial
version.
-/
@[simps]
def whisker (E : K ⥤ J) (c : Cocone F) : Cocone (E ⋙ F) where
pt := c.pt
ι := whiskerLeft E c.ι
#align category_theory.limits.cocone.whisker CategoryTheory.Limits.Cocone.whisker
end Cocone
/-- A cone morphism between two cones for the same diagram is a morphism of the cone points which
commutes with the cone legs. -/
structure ConeMorphism (A B : Cone F) where
/-- A morphism between the two vertex objects of the cones -/
hom : A.pt ⟶ B.pt
/-- The triangle consisting of the two natural transformations and `hom` commutes -/
w : ∀ j : J, hom ≫ B.π.app j = A.π.app j := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeMorphism
#align category_theory.limits.cone_morphism.w' CategoryTheory.Limits.ConeMorphism.w
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] ConeMorphism.w
instance inhabitedConeMorphism (A : Cone F) : Inhabited (ConeMorphism A A) :=
⟨{ hom := 𝟙 _ }⟩
#align category_theory.limits.inhabited_cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.inhabitedConeMorphism
/-- The category of cones on a given diagram. -/
@[simps]
instance Cone.category : Category (Cone F) where
Hom A B := ConeMorphism A B
comp f g := { hom := f.hom ≫ g.hom }
id B := { hom := 𝟙 B.pt }
#align category_theory.limits.cone.category CategoryTheory.Limits.Cone.category
-- Porting note: if we do not have `simps` automatically generate the lemma for simplifying
-- the hom field of a category, we need to write the `ext` lemma in terms of the categorical
-- morphism, rather than the underlying structure.
@[ext]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Cones.lean | 304 | 307 | theorem ConeMorphism.ext {c c' : Cone F} (f g : c ⟶ c') (w : f.hom = g.hom) : f = g := by |
cases f
cases g
congr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Scott Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
#align_import category_theory.isomorphism from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8350c34a64b9bc3fc64335df8006bffcadc7baa6"
/-!
# Isomorphisms
This file defines isomorphisms between objects of a category.
## Main definitions
- `structure Iso` : a bundled isomorphism between two objects of a category;
- `class IsIso` : an unbundled version of `iso`;
note that `IsIso f` is a `Prop`, and only asserts the existence of an inverse.
Of course, this inverse is unique, so it doesn't cost us much to use choice to retrieve it.
- `inv f`, for the inverse of a morphism with `[IsIso f]`
- `asIso` : convert from `IsIso` to `Iso` (noncomputable);
- `of_iso` : convert from `Iso` to `IsIso`;
- standard operations on isomorphisms (composition, inverse etc)
## Notations
- `X ≅ Y` : same as `Iso X Y`;
- `α ≪≫ β` : composition of two isomorphisms; it is called `Iso.trans`
## Tags
category, category theory, isomorphism
-/
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
/-- An isomorphism (a.k.a. an invertible morphism) between two objects of a category.
The inverse morphism is bundled.
See also `CategoryTheory.Core` for the category with the same objects and isomorphisms playing
the role of morphisms.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0017>.
-/
structure Iso {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (X Y : C) where
/-- The forward direction of an isomorphism. -/
hom : X ⟶ Y
/-- The backwards direction of an isomorphism. -/
inv : Y ⟶ X
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism is the identity on the source. -/
hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism in reverse order
is the identity on the target. -/
inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.iso CategoryTheory.Iso
#align category_theory.iso.hom CategoryTheory.Iso.hom
#align category_theory.iso.inv CategoryTheory.Iso.inv
#align category_theory.iso.inv_hom_id CategoryTheory.Iso.inv_hom_id
#align category_theory.iso.hom_inv_id CategoryTheory.Iso.hom_inv_id
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Iso.hom_inv_id Iso.inv_hom_id
#align category_theory.iso.hom_inv_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc
#align category_theory.iso.inv_hom_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc
/-- Notation for an isomorphism in a category. -/
infixr:10 " ≅ " => Iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace Iso
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃α β : X ≅ Y⦄ (w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
suffices α.inv = β.inv by
cases α
cases β
cases w
cases this
rfl
calc
α.inv = α.inv ≫ β.hom ≫ β.inv := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = (α.inv ≫ α.hom) ≫ β.inv := by rw [Category.assoc, ← w]
_ = β.inv := by rw [Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.id_comp]
#align category_theory.iso.ext CategoryTheory.Iso.ext
/-- Inverse isomorphism. -/
@[symm]
def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X where
hom := I.inv
inv := I.hom
#align category_theory.iso.symm CategoryTheory.Iso.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_hom (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.hom = α.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.symm_hom CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_hom
@[simp]
theorem symm_inv (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.inv = α.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.symm_inv CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_inv
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk {X Y : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id) :
Iso.symm { hom, inv, hom_inv_id := hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id := inv_hom_id } =
{ hom := inv, inv := hom, hom_inv_id := inv_hom_id, inv_hom_id := hom_inv_id } :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.symm_mk CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_mk
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm_eq {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.symm = α := by cases α; rfl
#align category_theory.iso.symm_symm_eq CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_symm_eq
@[simp]
theorem symm_eq_iff {X Y : C} {α β : X ≅ Y} : α.symm = β.symm ↔ α = β :=
⟨fun h => symm_symm_eq α ▸ symm_symm_eq β ▸ congr_arg symm h, congr_arg symm⟩
#align category_theory.iso.symm_eq_iff CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_eq_iff
theorem nonempty_iso_symm (X Y : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ Y) ↔ Nonempty (Y ≅ X) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩, fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.iso.nonempty_iso_symm CategoryTheory.Iso.nonempty_iso_symm
/-- Identity isomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X where
hom := 𝟙 X
inv := 𝟙 X
#align category_theory.iso.refl CategoryTheory.Iso.refl
#align category_theory.iso.refl_inv CategoryTheory.Iso.refl_inv
#align category_theory.iso.refl_hom CategoryTheory.Iso.refl_hom
instance : Inhabited (X ≅ X) := ⟨Iso.refl X⟩
theorem nonempty_iso_refl (X : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ X) := ⟨default⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm (X : C) : (Iso.refl X).symm = Iso.refl X := rfl
#align category_theory.iso.refl_symm CategoryTheory.Iso.refl_symm
-- Porting note: It seems that the trans `trans` attribute isn't working properly
-- in this case, so we have to manually add a `Trans` instance (with a `simps` tag).
/-- Composition of two isomorphisms -/
@[trans, simps]
def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z where
hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv
#align category_theory.iso.trans CategoryTheory.Iso.trans
#align category_theory.iso.trans_hom CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_hom
#align category_theory.iso.trans_inv CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_inv
@[simps]
instance instTransIso : Trans (α := C) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) where
trans := trans
/-- Notation for composition of isomorphisms. -/
infixr:80 " ≪≫ " => Iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp]
theorem trans_mk {X Y Z : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id)
(hom' : Y ⟶ Z) (inv' : Z ⟶ Y) (hom_inv_id') (inv_hom_id') (hom_inv_id'') (inv_hom_id'') :
Iso.trans ⟨hom, inv, hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id⟩ ⟨hom', inv', hom_inv_id', inv_hom_id'⟩ =
⟨hom ≫ hom', inv' ≫ inv, hom_inv_id'', inv_hom_id''⟩ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.trans_mk CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_mk
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ≪≫ β).symm = β.symm ≪≫ α.symm :=
rfl
#align category_theory.iso.trans_symm CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem trans_assoc {Z' : C} (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) (γ : Z ≅ Z') :
(α ≪≫ β) ≪≫ γ = α ≪≫ β ≪≫ γ := by
ext; simp only [trans_hom, Category.assoc]
#align category_theory.iso.trans_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_assoc
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (α : X ≅ Y) : Iso.refl X ≪≫ α = α := by ext; apply Category.id_comp
#align category_theory.iso.refl_trans CategoryTheory.Iso.refl_trans
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ Iso.refl Y = α := by ext; apply Category.comp_id
#align category_theory.iso.trans_refl CategoryTheory.Iso.trans_refl
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm ≪≫ α = Iso.refl Y :=
ext α.inv_hom_id
#align category_theory.iso.symm_self_id CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_self_id
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ α.symm = Iso.refl X :=
ext α.hom_inv_id
#align category_theory.iso.self_symm_id CategoryTheory.Iso.self_symm_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : α.symm ≪≫ α ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, symm_self_id, refl_trans]
#align category_theory.iso.symm_self_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.symm_self_id_assoc
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : X ≅ Z) : α ≪≫ α.symm ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, self_symm_id, refl_trans]
#align category_theory.iso.self_symm_id_assoc CategoryTheory.Iso.self_symm_id_assoc
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : α.inv ≫ f = g ↔ f = α.hom ≫ g :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
#align category_theory.iso.inv_comp_eq CategoryTheory.Iso.inv_comp_eq
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = α.inv ≫ f ↔ α.hom ≫ g = f :=
(inv_comp_eq α.symm).symm
#align category_theory.iso.eq_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Iso.eq_inv_comp
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.inv = g ↔ f = g ≫ α.hom :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
#align category_theory.iso.comp_inv_eq CategoryTheory.Iso.comp_inv_eq
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ α.inv ↔ g ≫ α.hom = f :=
(comp_inv_eq α.symm).symm
#align category_theory.iso.eq_comp_inv CategoryTheory.Iso.eq_comp_inv
theorem inv_eq_inv (f g : X ≅ Y) : f.inv = g.inv ↔ f.hom = g.hom :=
have : ∀ {X Y : C} (f g : X ≅ Y), f.hom = g.hom → f.inv = g.inv := fun f g h => by rw [ext h]
⟨this f.symm g.symm, this f g⟩
#align category_theory.iso.inv_eq_inv CategoryTheory.Iso.inv_eq_inv
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Iso.lean | 232 | 233 | theorem hom_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : α.hom ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.inv := by |
rw [← eq_inv_comp, comp_id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
#align_import measure_theory.function.simple_func from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf6a01357ff5684b1ebcd0f1a13be314fc82c0bf"
/-!
# Simple functions
A function `f` from a measurable space to any type is called *simple*, if every preimage `f ⁻¹' {x}`
is measurable, and the range is finite. In this file, we define simple functions and establish their
basic properties; and we construct a sequence of simple functions approximating an arbitrary Borel
measurable function `f : α → ℝ≥0∞`.
The theorem `Measurable.ennreal_induction` shows that in order to prove something for an arbitrary
measurable function into `ℝ≥0∞`, it is sufficient to show that the property holds for (multiples of)
characteristic functions and is closed under addition and supremum of increasing sequences of
functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding restrict restrict_apply
open Filter ENNReal
open Function (support)
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
/-- A function `f` from a measurable space to any type is called *simple*,
if every preimage `f ⁻¹' {x}` is measurable, and the range is finite. This structure bundles
a function with these properties. -/
structure SimpleFunc.{u, v} (α : Type u) [MeasurableSpace α] (β : Type v) where
toFun : α → β
measurableSet_fiber' : ∀ x, MeasurableSet (toFun ⁻¹' {x})
finite_range' : (Set.range toFun).Finite
#align measure_theory.simple_func MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
#align measure_theory.simple_func.to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.toFun
#align measure_theory.simple_func.measurable_set_fiber' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber'
#align measure_theory.simple_func.finite_range' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.finite_range'
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →ₛ β) fun _ => α → β :=
⟨toFun⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.instCoeFun
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/SimpleFunc.lean | 66 | 67 | theorem coe_injective ⦃f g : α →ₛ β⦄ (H : (f : α → β) = g) : f = g := by |
cases f; cases g; congr
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, David Kurniadi Angdinata, Devon Tuma, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.quotient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4f840b8d28320b20c87db17b3a6eef3d325fca87"
/-!
# Quotients of polynomial rings
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux2 (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ (RingHom.ker (aeval x).toRingHom : Ideal R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
let e := RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse (fun x => by
exact eval_C : Function.RightInverse (fun a : R => (C a : R[X])) (@aeval R R _ _ _ x))
{ e with commutes' := fun r => e.apply_symm_apply r }
noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux1 (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {X - C x}) ≃ₐ[R] (R[X] ⧸ (RingHom.ker (aeval x).toRingHom : Ideal R[X])) :=
@Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R R[X] _ _ _ _ _ (ker_evalRingHom x).symm
-- Porting note: need to split this definition into two sub-definitions to prevent time out
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at an element $x \in R$ induces an
isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X] / \langle X - x \rangle \cong R$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv (x : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span ({X - C x} : Set R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
(quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux1 x).trans (quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquivAux2 x)
#align polynomial.quotient_span_X_sub_C_alg_equiv Polynomial.quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv
@[simp]
theorem quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_mk (x : R) (p : R[X]) :
quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x (Ideal.Quotient.mk _ p) = p.eval x :=
rfl
#align polynomial.quotient_span_X_sub_C_alg_equiv_mk Polynomial.quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_mk
@[simp]
theorem quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_symm_apply (x : R) (y : R) :
(quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x).symm y = algebraMap R _ y :=
rfl
#align polynomial.quotient_span_X_sub_C_alg_equiv_symm_apply Polynomial.quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv_symm_apply
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at an element $y \in R$ induces an
isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X] / \langle x, X - y \rangle \cong R / \langle x \rangle$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv (x y : R) :
(R[X] ⧸ (Ideal.span {C x, X - C y} : Ideal R[X])) ≃ₐ[R] R ⧸ (Ideal.span {x} : Ideal R) :=
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by rw [Ideal.span_insert, sup_comm]).trans <|
(DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotSupₐ R _ _).symm.trans <|
(Ideal.quotientEquivAlg _ _ (quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv y) rfl).trans <|
Ideal.quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by
simp only [Ideal.map_span, Set.image_singleton]; congr 2; exact eval_C
#align polynomial.quotient_span_C_X_sub_C_alg_equiv Polynomial.quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv
/-- For a commutative ring $R$, evaluating a polynomial at elements $y(X) \in R[X]$ and $x \in R$
induces an isomorphism of $R$-algebras $R[X, Y] / \langle X - x, Y - y(X) \rangle \cong R$. -/
noncomputable def quotientSpanCXSubCXSubCAlgEquiv {x : R} {y : R[X]} :
@AlgEquiv R (R[X][X] ⧸ (Ideal.span {C (X - C x), X - C y} : Ideal <| R[X][X])) R _ _ _
(Ideal.Quotient.algebra R) _ :=
((quotientSpanCXSubCAlgEquiv (X - C x) y).restrictScalars R).trans <| quotientSpanXSubCAlgEquiv x
lemma modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_quotient_eq_zero (p q : R[X]) (hq : q.Monic) :
p %ₘ q = 0 ↔ (p : R[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {q}) = 0 := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq, Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_dvd]
end Polynomial
namespace Ideal
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
theorem quotient_map_C_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} :
∀ a ∈ I, ((Quotient.mk (map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X])).comp C) a = 0 := by
intro a ha
rw [RingHom.comp_apply, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem]
exact mem_map_of_mem _ ha
#align ideal.quotient_map_C_eq_zero Ideal.quotient_map_C_eq_zero
theorem eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero {I : Ideal R} :
∀ f ∈ (map (C : R →+* R[X]) I : Ideal R[X]), eval₂RingHom (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X f = 0 := by
intro a ha
rw [← sum_monomial_eq a]
dsimp
rw [eval₂_sum]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun n _ => ?_
dsimp
rw [eval₂_monomial (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left (Polynomial.ext fun m => ?_) (X ^ n)
erw [coeff_C]
by_cases h : m = 0
· simpa [h] using Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.2 ((mem_map_C_iff.1 ha) n)
· simp [h]
#align ideal.eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero Ideal.eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero
/-- If `I` is an ideal of `R`, then the ring polynomials over the quotient ring `I.quotient` is
isomorphic to the quotient of `R[X]` by the ideal `map C I`,
where `map C I` contains exactly the polynomials whose coefficients all lie in `I`. -/
def polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial (I : Ideal R) :
(R ⧸ I)[X] ≃+* R[X] ⧸ (map C I : Ideal R[X]) where
toFun :=
eval₂RingHom
(Quotient.lift I ((Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X])).comp C) quotient_map_C_eq_zero)
(Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X]) X)
invFun :=
Quotient.lift (map C I : Ideal R[X]) (eval₂RingHom (C.comp (Quotient.mk I)) X)
eval₂_C_mk_eq_zero
map_mul' f g := by simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom, eval₂_mul]
map_add' f g := by simp only [eval₂_add, coe_eval₂RingHom]
left_inv := by
intro f
refine Polynomial.induction_on' f ?_ ?_
· intro p q hp hq
simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom] at hp hq
simp only [coe_eval₂RingHom, hp, hq, RingHom.map_add]
· rintro n ⟨x⟩
simp only [← smul_X_eq_monomial, C_mul', Quotient.lift_mk, Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk,
Quotient.mk_eq_mk, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_smul, coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_pow, eval₂_C,
RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X, Function.comp_apply]
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨f⟩
refine Polynomial.induction_on' f ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: was `simp_intro p q hp hq`
intros p q hp hq
simp only [Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, map_add, Quotient.lift_mk,
coe_eval₂RingHom] at hp hq ⊢
rw [hp, hq]
· intro n a
simp only [← smul_X_eq_monomial, ← C_mul' a (X ^ n), Quotient.lift_mk,
Submodule.Quotient.quot_mk_eq_mk, Quotient.mk_eq_mk, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_smul,
coe_eval₂RingHom, RingHom.map_pow, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, RingHom.map_mul, eval₂_X,
Function.comp_apply]
#align ideal.polynomial_quotient_equiv_quotient_polynomial Ideal.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial
@[simp]
theorem polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk (I : Ideal R) (f : R[X]) :
I.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial.symm (Quotient.mk _ f) = f.map (Quotient.mk I) := by
rw [polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial, RingEquiv.symm_mk, RingEquiv.coe_mk,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Quotient.lift_mk, coe_eval₂RingHom, eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← Polynomial.map_map,
← eval₂_eq_eval_map, Polynomial.eval₂_C_X]
#align ideal.polynomial_quotient_equiv_quotient_polynomial_symm_mk Ideal.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk
@[simp]
theorem polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_map_mk (I : Ideal R) (f : R[X]) :
I.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial (f.map <| Quotient.mk I) =
Quotient.mk (map C I : Ideal R[X]) f := by
apply (polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial I).symm.injective
rw [RingEquiv.symm_apply_apply, polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_symm_mk]
#align ideal.polynomial_quotient_equiv_quotient_polynomial_map_mk Ideal.polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial_map_mk
/-- If `P` is a prime ideal of `R`, then `R[x]/(P)` is an integral domain. -/
theorem isDomain_map_C_quotient {P : Ideal R} (_ : IsPrime P) :
IsDomain (R[X] ⧸ (map (C : R →+* R[X]) P : Ideal R[X])) :=
MulEquiv.isDomain (Polynomial (R ⧸ P)) (polynomialQuotientEquivQuotientPolynomial P).symm
#align ideal.is_domain_map_C_quotient Ideal.isDomain_map_C_quotient
/-- Given any ring `R` and an ideal `I` of `R[X]`, we get a map `R → R[x] → R[x]/I`.
If we let `R` be the image of `R` in `R[x]/I` then we also have a map `R[x] → R'[x]`.
In particular we can map `I` across this map, to get `I'` and a new map `R' → R'[x] → R'[x]/I`.
This theorem shows `I'` will not contain any non-zero constant polynomials. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Quotient.lean | 175 | 194 | theorem eq_zero_of_polynomial_mem_map_range (I : Ideal R[X]) (x : ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).range)
(hx : C x ∈ I.map (Polynomial.mapRingHom ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).rangeRestrict)) : x = 0 := by |
let i := ((Quotient.mk I).comp C).rangeRestrict
have hi' : RingHom.ker (Polynomial.mapRingHom i) ≤ I := by
refine fun f hf => polynomial_mem_ideal_of_coeff_mem_ideal I f fun n => ?_
rw [mem_comap, ← Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ← RingHom.comp_apply]
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, coe_mapRingHom] at hf
replace hf := congr_arg (fun f : Polynomial _ => f.coeff n) hf
simp only [coeff_map, coeff_zero] at hf
rwa [Subtype.ext_iff, RingHom.coe_rangeRestrict] at hf
obtain ⟨x, hx'⟩ := x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := RingHom.mem_range.1 hx'
refine Subtype.eq ?_
simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem, ZeroMemClass.coe_zero]
suffices C (i y) ∈ I.map (Polynomial.mapRingHom i) by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := mem_image_of_mem_map_of_surjective (Polynomial.mapRingHom i)
(Polynomial.map_surjective _ (RingHom.rangeRestrict_surjective ((Quotient.mk I).comp C))) this
refine sub_add_cancel (C y) f ▸ I.add_mem (hi' ?_ : C y - f ∈ I) hf.1
rw [RingHom.mem_ker, RingHom.map_sub, hf.2, sub_eq_zero, coe_mapRingHom, map_C]
exact hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Scott Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.category from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g: X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:max => (MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit : C)
open Lean PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr in
/-- Used to ensure that `𝟙_` notation is used, as the ascription makes this not automatic. -/
@[delab app.CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit]
def delabTensorUnit : Delab := whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 3 do
let e ← getExpr
guard <| e.isAppOfArity ``MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit 3
let C ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(𝟙_ $C)
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g: X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Composition of tensor products is tensor product of compositions:
`(f₁ ⊗ g₁) ∘ (f₂ ⊗ g₂) = (f₁ ∘ f₂) ⊗ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_category CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.left_unitor_conjugation CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerLeft
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
#align category_theory.monoidal_category.right_unitor_conjugation CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.whiskerRight_id
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
end MonoidalCategory
open scoped MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
namespace MonoidalCategory
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 346 | 348 | theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by |
aesop_cat
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Conj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subsemigroup.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.Atoms
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import group_theory.subgroup.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
/-!
# Subgroups
This file defines multiplicative and additive subgroups as an extension of submonoids, in a bundled
form (unbundled subgroups are in `Deprecated/Subgroups.lean`).
We prove subgroups of a group form a complete lattice, and results about images and preimages of
subgroups under group homomorphisms. The bundled subgroups use bundled monoid homomorphisms.
There are also theorems about the subgroups generated by an element or a subset of a group,
defined both inductively and as the infimum of the set of subgroups containing a given
element/subset.
Special thanks goes to Amelia Livingston and Yury Kudryashov for their help and inspiration.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `G N` are `Group`s
- `A` is an `AddGroup`
- `H K` are `Subgroup`s of `G` or `AddSubgroup`s of `A`
- `x` is an element of type `G` or type `A`
- `f g : N →* G` are group homomorphisms
- `s k` are sets of elements of type `G`
Definitions in the file:
* `Subgroup G` : the type of subgroups of a group `G`
* `AddSubgroup A` : the type of subgroups of an additive group `A`
* `CompleteLattice (Subgroup G)` : the subgroups of `G` form a complete lattice
* `Subgroup.closure k` : the minimal subgroup that includes the set `k`
* `Subgroup.subtype` : the natural group homomorphism from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`
* `Subgroup.gi` : `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set
* `Subgroup.comap H f` : the preimage of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.map f H` : the image of a subgroup `H` along the group homomorphism `f` is also a
subgroup
* `Subgroup.prod H K` : the product of subgroups `H`, `K` of groups `G`, `N` respectively, `H × K`
is a subgroup of `G × N`
* `MonoidHom.range f` : the range of the group homomorphism `f` is a subgroup
* `MonoidHom.ker f` : the kernel of a group homomorphism `f` is the subgroup of elements `x : G`
such that `f x = 1`
* `MonoidHom.eq_locus f g` : given group homomorphisms `f`, `g`, the elements of `G` such that
`f x = g x` form a subgroup of `G`
## Implementation notes
Subgroup inclusion is denoted `≤` rather than `⊆`, although `∈` is defined as
membership of a subgroup's underlying set.
## Tags
subgroup, subgroups
-/
open Function
open Int
variable {G G' G'' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] [Group G'']
variable {A : Type*} [AddGroup A]
section SubgroupClass
/-- `InvMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under inverses. -/
class InvMemClass (S G : Type*) [Inv G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s
#align inv_mem_class InvMemClass
export InvMemClass (inv_mem)
/-- `NegMemClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` closed under negation. -/
class NegMemClass (S G : Type*) [Neg G] [SetLike S G] : Prop where
/-- `s` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem : ∀ {s : S} {x}, x ∈ s → -x ∈ s
#align neg_mem_class NegMemClass
export NegMemClass (neg_mem)
/-- `SubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are subgroups of `G`. -/
class SubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends SubmonoidClass S G,
InvMemClass S G : Prop
#align subgroup_class SubgroupClass
/-- `AddSubgroupClass S G` states `S` is a type of subsets `s ⊆ G` that are
additive subgroups of `G`. -/
class AddSubgroupClass (S G : Type*) [SubNegMonoid G] [SetLike S G] extends AddSubmonoidClass S G,
NegMemClass S G : Prop
#align add_subgroup_class AddSubgroupClass
attribute [to_additive] InvMemClass SubgroupClass
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] inv_mem neg_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_mem_iff {S G} [InvolutiveInv G] {_ : SetLike S G} [InvMemClass S G] {H : S}
{x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
⟨fun h => inv_inv x ▸ inv_mem h, inv_mem⟩
#align inv_mem_iff inv_mem_iff
#align neg_mem_iff neg_mem_iff
@[simp] theorem abs_mem_iff {S G} [AddGroup G] [LinearOrder G] {_ : SetLike S G}
[NegMemClass S G] {H : S} {x : G} : |x| ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H := by
cases abs_choice x <;> simp [*]
variable {M S : Type*} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [hSM : SubgroupClass S M] {H K : S}
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"An additive subgroup is closed under subtraction."]
theorem div_mem {x y : M} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact mul_mem hx (inv_mem hy)
#align div_mem div_mem
#align sub_mem sub_mem
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))]
theorem zpow_mem {x : M} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K
| (n : ℕ) => by
rw [zpow_natCast]
exact pow_mem hx n
| -[n+1] => by
rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact inv_mem (pow_mem hx n.succ)
#align zpow_mem zpow_mem
#align zsmul_mem zsmul_mem
variable [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G]
@[to_additive]
theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
inv_div b a ▸ inv_mem_iff
#align div_mem_comm_iff div_mem_comm_iff
#align sub_mem_comm_iff sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive /-(attr := simp)-/] -- Porting note: `simp` cannot simplify LHS
theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ H ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, P x := by
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, inv_mem x_in, by simp [hx]⟩
#align exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hba => by simpa using mul_mem hba (inv_mem h), fun hb => mul_mem hb h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_right mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_mem_cancel_right add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
⟨fun hab => by simpa using mul_mem (inv_mem h) hab, mul_mem h⟩
#align mul_mem_cancel_left mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_mem_cancel_left add_mem_cancel_left
namespace InvMemClass
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [Inv G] [SetLike S G]
[InvMemClass S G] {H : S} : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_inv InvMemClass.inv
#align add_subgroup_class.has_neg NegMemClass.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : (x⁻¹).1 = x.1⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_inv InvMemClass.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_neg NegMemClass.coe_neg
end InvMemClass
namespace SubgroupClass
@[to_additive (attr := deprecated (since := "2024-01-15"))] alias coe_inv := InvMemClass.coe_inv
-- Here we assume H, K, and L are subgroups, but in fact any one of them
-- could be allowed to be a subsemigroup.
-- Counterexample where K and L are submonoids: H = ℤ, K = ℕ, L = -ℕ
-- Counterexample where H and K are submonoids: H = {n | n = 0 ∨ 3 ≤ n}, K = 3ℕ + 4ℕ, L = 5ℤ
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_union {H K L : S} : (H : Set G) ⊆ K ∪ L ↔ H ≤ K ∨ H ≤ L := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h x xH ↦ h.imp (· xH) (· xH)⟩
rw [or_iff_not_imp_left, SetLike.not_le_iff_exists]
exact fun ⟨x, xH, xK⟩ y yH ↦ (h <| mul_mem xH yH).elim
((h yH).resolve_left fun yK ↦ xK <| (mul_mem_cancel_right yK).mp ·)
(mul_mem_cancel_left <| (h xH).resolve_left xK).mp
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div {G : Type u_1} {S : Type u_2} [DivInvMonoid G] [SetLike S G]
[SubgroupClass S G] {H : S} : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_div SubgroupClass.div
#align add_subgroup_class.has_sub AddSubgroupClass.sub
/-- An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroupClass.zsmul {M S} [SubNegMonoid M] [SetLike S M]
[AddSubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a.1, zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup_class.has_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power. -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow {M S} [DivInvMonoid M] [SetLike S M] [SubgroupClass S M] {H : S} : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a.1 ^ n, zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup_class.has_zpow SubgroupClass.zpow
-- Porting note: additive align statement is given above
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (x / y).1 = x.1 / y.1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_div SubgroupClass.coe_div
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_sub AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub
variable (H)
-- Prefer subclasses of `Group` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance (priority := 75) toGroup : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_group SubgroupClass.toGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddGroup
-- Prefer subclasses of `CommGroup` over subclasses of `SubgroupClass`.
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance (priority := 75) toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] [SetLike S G] [SubgroupClass S G] :
CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.to_comm_group SubgroupClass.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup_class.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroupClass.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"The natural group hom from an additive subgroup of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' := fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup_class.subtype SubgroupClass.subtype
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype AddSubgroupClass.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : (SubgroupClass.subtype H : H → G) = ((↑) : H → G) := by
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_subtype SubgroupClass.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_subtype AddSubgroupClass.coeSubtype
variable {H}
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_pow SubgroupClass.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_smul AddSubgroupClass.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.coe_zpow SubgroupClass.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_zsmul AddSubgroupClass.coe_zsmul
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : S} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.prop⟩) fun _ _=> rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion AddSubgroupClass.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_self (x : H) : inclusion le_rfl x = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_self SubgroupClass.inclusion_self
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_self AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_self
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inclusion_mk {h : H ≤ K} (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = ⟨x, h hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_mk SubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_mk AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_mk
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_right (h : H ≤ K) (x : K) (hx : (x : G) ∈ H) : inclusion h ⟨x, hx⟩ = x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_right SubgroupClass.inclusion_right
#align add_subgroup_class.inclusion_right AddSubgroupClass.inclusion_right
@[simp]
theorem inclusion_inclusion {L : S} (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) (x : H) :
inclusion hKL (inclusion hHK x) = inclusion (hHK.trans hKL) x := by
cases x
rfl
#align subgroup_class.inclusion_inclusion SubgroupClass.inclusion_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : S} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup_class.coe_inclusion SubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.coe_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : S} (hH : H ≤ K) :
(SubgroupClass.subtype K).comp (inclusion hH) = SubgroupClass.subtype H := by
ext
simp only [MonoidHom.comp_apply, coeSubtype, coe_inclusion]
#align subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion SubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup_class.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroupClass.subtype_comp_inclusion
end SubgroupClass
end SubgroupClass
/-- A subgroup of a group `G` is a subset containing 1, closed under multiplication
and closed under multiplicative inverse. -/
structure Subgroup (G : Type*) [Group G] extends Submonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under inverses -/
inv_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align subgroup Subgroup
/-- An additive subgroup of an additive group `G` is a subset containing 0, closed
under addition and additive inverse. -/
structure AddSubgroup (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddSubmonoid G where
/-- `G` is closed under negation -/
neg_mem' {x} : x ∈ carrier → -x ∈ carrier
#align add_subgroup AddSubgroup
attribute [to_additive] Subgroup
-- Porting note: Removed, translation already exists
-- attribute [to_additive AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid] Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret a `Subgroup` as a `Submonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc Subgroup.toSubmonoid
#align subgroup.to_submonoid Subgroup.toSubmonoid
/-- Reinterpret an `AddSubgroup` as an `AddSubmonoid`. -/
add_decl_doc AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (Subgroup G) G where
coe s := s.carrier
coe_injective' p q h := by
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hp,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := p
obtain ⟨⟨⟨hq,_⟩,_⟩,_⟩ := q
congr
-- Porting note: Below can probably be written more uniformly
@[to_additive]
instance : SubgroupClass (Subgroup G) G where
inv_mem := Subgroup.inv_mem' _
one_mem _ := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).one_mem'
mul_mem := (Subgroup.toSubmonoid _).mul_mem'
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_carrier Subgroup.mem_carrier
#align add_subgroup.mem_carrier AddSubgroup.mem_carrier
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set G} {x : G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
x ∈ mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_mk Subgroup.mem_mk
#align add_subgroup.mem_mk AddSubgroup.mem_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_set_mk {s : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) :
(mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_set_mk Subgroup.coe_set_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_set_mk AddSubgroup.coe_set_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_le_mk {s t : Set G} (h_one) (h_mul) (h_inv) (h_one') (h_mul') (h_inv') :
mk ⟨⟨s, h_one⟩, h_mul⟩ h_inv ≤ mk ⟨⟨t, h_one'⟩, h_mul'⟩ h_inv' ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mk_le_mk Subgroup.mk_le_mk
#align add_subgroup.mk_le_mk AddSubgroup.mk_le_mk
initialize_simps_projections Subgroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections AddSubgroup (carrier → coe)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) : (K.toSubmonoid : Set G) = K :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_to_submonoid Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.coe_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.coe_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_toSubmonoid (K : Subgroup G) (x : G) : x ∈ K.toSubmonoid ↔ x ∈ K :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_to_submonoid Subgroup.mem_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.mem_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.mem_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem toSubmonoid_injective : Function.Injective (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
-- fun p q h => SetLike.ext'_iff.2 (show _ from SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h)
fun p q h => by
have := SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h
rw [coe_toSubmonoid, coe_toSubmonoid] at this
exact SetLike.ext'_iff.2 this
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_injective Subgroup.toSubmonoid_injective
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_injective AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_eq {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid = q.toSubmonoid ↔ p = q :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_eq Subgroup.toSubmonoid_eq
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_eq AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_eq
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_strictMono : StrictMono (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) := fun _ _ =>
id
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_strict_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_strictMono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_strict_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_strictMono
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem toSubmonoid_mono : Monotone (toSubmonoid : Subgroup G → Submonoid G) :=
toSubmonoid_strictMono.monotone
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_mono Subgroup.toSubmonoid_mono
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_mono AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_mono
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem toSubmonoid_le {p q : Subgroup G} : p.toSubmonoid ≤ q.toSubmonoid ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_submonoid_le Subgroup.toSubmonoid_le
#align add_subgroup.to_add_submonoid_le AddSubgroup.toAddSubmonoid_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma coe_nonempty (s : Subgroup G) : (s : Set G).Nonempty := ⟨1, one_mem _⟩
end Subgroup
/-!
### Conversion to/from `Additive`/`Multiplicative`
-/
section mul_add
/-- Subgroups of a group `G` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `Additive G`. -/
@[simps!]
def Subgroup.toAddSubgroup : Subgroup G ≃o AddSubgroup (Additive G) where
toFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
invFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup Subgroup.toAddSubgroup
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup_apply_coe Subgroup.toAddSubgroup_apply_coe
/-- Additive subgroup of an additive group `Additive G` are isomorphic to subgroup of `G`. -/
abbrev AddSubgroup.toSubgroup' : AddSubgroup (Additive G) ≃o Subgroup G :=
Subgroup.toAddSubgroup.symm
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup' AddSubgroup.toSubgroup'
/-- Additive subgroups of an additive group `A` are isomorphic to subgroups of `Multiplicative A`.
-/
@[simps!]
def AddSubgroup.toSubgroup : AddSubgroup A ≃o Subgroup (Multiplicative A) where
toFun S := { AddSubmonoid.toSubmonoid S.toAddSubmonoid with inv_mem' := S.neg_mem' }
invFun S := { Submonoid.toAddSubmonoid S.toSubmonoid with neg_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
left_inv x := by cases x; rfl
right_inv x := by cases x; rfl
map_rel_iff' := Iff.rfl
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup AddSubgroup.toSubgroup
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.to_subgroup_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.toSubgroup_symm_apply_coe
/-- Subgroups of an additive group `Multiplicative A` are isomorphic to additive subgroups of `A`.
-/
abbrev Subgroup.toAddSubgroup' : Subgroup (Multiplicative A) ≃o AddSubgroup A :=
AddSubgroup.toSubgroup.symm
#align subgroup.to_add_subgroup' Subgroup.toAddSubgroup'
end mul_add
namespace Subgroup
variable (H K : Subgroup G)
/-- Copy of a subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[to_additive
"Copy of an additive subgroup with a new `carrier` equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities"]
protected def copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = K) : Subgroup G where
carrier := s
one_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.one_mem'
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ K.mul_mem'
inv_mem' hx := by simpa [hs] using hx -- Porting note: `▸` didn't work here
#align subgroup.copy Subgroup.copy
#align add_subgroup.copy AddSubgroup.copy
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : (K.copy s hs : Set G) = s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_copy Subgroup.coe_copy
#align add_subgroup.coe_copy AddSubgroup.coe_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq (K : Subgroup G) (s : Set G) (hs : s = ↑K) : K.copy s hs = K :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subgroup.copy_eq Subgroup.copy_eq
#align add_subgroup.copy_eq AddSubgroup.copy_eq
/-- Two subgroups are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two `AddSubgroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {H K : Subgroup G} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ H ↔ x ∈ K) : H = K :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subgroup.ext Subgroup.ext
#align add_subgroup.ext AddSubgroup.ext
/-- A subgroup contains the group's 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` contains the group's 0."]
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ H :=
one_mem _
#align subgroup.one_mem Subgroup.one_mem
#align add_subgroup.zero_mem AddSubgroup.zero_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under addition."]
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : G} : x ∈ H → y ∈ H → x * y ∈ H :=
mul_mem
#align subgroup.mul_mem Subgroup.mul_mem
#align add_subgroup.add_mem AddSubgroup.add_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under inverse."]
protected theorem inv_mem {x : G} : x ∈ H → x⁻¹ ∈ H :=
inv_mem
#align subgroup.inv_mem Subgroup.inv_mem
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem AddSubgroup.neg_mem
/-- A subgroup is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` is closed under subtraction."]
protected theorem div_mem {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ H) (hy : y ∈ H) : x / y ∈ H :=
div_mem hx hy
#align subgroup.div_mem Subgroup.div_mem
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem AddSubgroup.sub_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem inv_mem_iff {x : G} : x⁻¹ ∈ H ↔ x ∈ H :=
inv_mem_iff
#align subgroup.inv_mem_iff Subgroup.inv_mem_iff
#align add_subgroup.neg_mem_iff AddSubgroup.neg_mem_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem div_mem_comm_iff {a b : G} : a / b ∈ H ↔ b / a ∈ H :=
div_mem_comm_iff
#align subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff Subgroup.div_mem_comm_iff
#align add_subgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff AddSubgroup.sub_mem_comm_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem (K : Subgroup G) {P : G → Prop} :
(∃ x : G, x ∈ K ∧ P x⁻¹) ↔ ∃ x ∈ K, P x :=
exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem Subgroup.exists_inv_mem_iff_exists_mem
#align add_subgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem AddSubgroup.exists_neg_mem_iff_exists_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_right {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : y * x ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_right h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_right
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_right AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_right
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_mem_cancel_left {x y : G} (h : x ∈ H) : x * y ∈ H ↔ y ∈ H :=
mul_mem_cancel_left h
#align subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left Subgroup.mul_mem_cancel_left
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_cancel_left AddSubgroup.add_mem_cancel_left
@[to_additive]
protected theorem pow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℕ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
pow_mem hx
#align subgroup.pow_mem Subgroup.pow_mem
#align add_subgroup.nsmul_mem AddSubgroup.nsmul_mem
@[to_additive]
protected theorem zpow_mem {x : G} (hx : x ∈ K) : ∀ n : ℤ, x ^ n ∈ K :=
zpow_mem hx
#align subgroup.zpow_mem Subgroup.zpow_mem
#align add_subgroup.zsmul_mem AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem
/-- Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under division. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a subgroup from a nonempty set that is closed under subtraction"]
def ofDiv (s : Set G) (hsn : s.Nonempty) (hs : ∀ᵉ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), x * y⁻¹ ∈ s) :
Subgroup G :=
have one_mem : (1 : G) ∈ s := by
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hsn
simpa using hs x hx x hx
have inv_mem : ∀ x, x ∈ s → x⁻¹ ∈ s := fun x hx => by simpa using hs 1 one_mem x hx
{ carrier := s
one_mem' := one_mem
inv_mem' := inv_mem _
mul_mem' := fun hx hy => by simpa using hs _ hx _ (inv_mem _ hy) }
#align subgroup.of_div Subgroup.ofDiv
#align add_subgroup.of_sub AddSubgroup.ofSub
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a multiplication. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an addition."]
instance mul : Mul H :=
H.toSubmonoid.mul
#align subgroup.has_mul Subgroup.mul
#align add_subgroup.has_add AddSubgroup.add
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a 1. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a zero."]
instance one : One H :=
H.toSubmonoid.one
#align subgroup.has_one Subgroup.one
#align add_subgroup.has_zero AddSubgroup.zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an inverse. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an inverse."]
instance inv : Inv H :=
⟨fun a => ⟨a⁻¹, H.inv_mem a.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_inv Subgroup.inv
#align add_subgroup.has_neg AddSubgroup.neg
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a division -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a subtraction."]
instance div : Div H :=
⟨fun a b => ⟨a / b, H.div_mem a.2 b.2⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_div Subgroup.div
#align add_subgroup.has_sub AddSubgroup.sub
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits a natural scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.nsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℕ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.nsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_nsmul AddSubgroup.nsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a natural power -/
@[to_additive existing]
protected instance npow : Pow H ℕ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.pow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_npow Subgroup.npow
/-- An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an integer scaling. -/
instance _root_.AddSubgroup.zsmul {G} [AddGroup G] {H : AddSubgroup G} : SMul ℤ H :=
⟨fun n a => ⟨n • a, H.zsmul_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align add_subgroup.has_zsmul AddSubgroup.zsmul
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits an integer power -/
@[to_additive existing]
instance zpow : Pow H ℤ :=
⟨fun a n => ⟨a ^ n, H.zpow_mem a.2 n⟩⟩
#align subgroup.has_zpow Subgroup.zpow
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mul (x y : H) : (↑(x * y) : G) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mul Subgroup.coe_mul
#align add_subgroup.coe_add AddSubgroup.coe_add
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : H) : G) = 1 :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_one Subgroup.coe_one
#align add_subgroup.coe_zero AddSubgroup.coe_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_inv (x : H) : ↑(x⁻¹ : H) = (x⁻¹ : G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inv Subgroup.coe_inv
#align add_subgroup.coe_neg AddSubgroup.coe_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_div (x y : H) : (↑(x / y) : G) = ↑x / ↑y :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_div Subgroup.coe_div
#align add_subgroup.coe_sub AddSubgroup.coe_sub
-- Porting note: removed simp, theorem has variable as head symbol
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)]
theorem coe_mk (x : G) (hx : x ∈ H) : ((⟨x, hx⟩ : H) : G) = x :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_mk Subgroup.coe_mk
#align add_subgroup.coe_mk AddSubgroup.coe_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_pow (x : H) (n : ℕ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_pow Subgroup.coe_pow
#align add_subgroup.coe_nsmul AddSubgroup.coe_nsmul
@[to_additive (attr := norm_cast)] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem coe_zpow (x : H) (n : ℤ) : ((x ^ n : H) : G) = (x : G) ^ n :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_zpow Subgroup.coe_zpow
#align add_subgroup.coe_zsmul AddSubgroup.coe_zsmul
@[to_additive] -- This can be proved by `Submonoid.mk_eq_one`
theorem mk_eq_one {g : G} {h} : (⟨g, h⟩ : H) = 1 ↔ g = 1 := by simp
#align subgroup.mk_eq_one_iff Subgroup.mk_eq_one
#align add_subgroup.mk_eq_zero_iff AddSubgroup.mk_eq_zero
/-- A subgroup of a group inherits a group structure. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddGroup` inherits an `AddGroup` structure."]
instance toGroup {G : Type*} [Group G] (H : Subgroup G) : Group H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.group _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_group Subgroup.toGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_group AddSubgroup.toAddGroup
/-- A subgroup of a `CommGroup` is a `CommGroup`. -/
@[to_additive "An `AddSubgroup` of an `AddCommGroup` is an `AddCommGroup`."]
instance toCommGroup {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] (H : Subgroup G) : CommGroup H :=
Subtype.coe_injective.commGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.to_comm_group Subgroup.toCommGroup
#align add_subgroup.to_add_comm_group AddSubgroup.toAddCommGroup
/-- The natural group hom from a subgroup of group `G` to `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The natural group hom from an `AddSubgroup` of `AddGroup` `G` to `G`."]
protected def subtype : H →* G where
toFun := ((↑) : H → G); map_one' := rfl; map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align subgroup.subtype Subgroup.subtype
#align add_subgroup.subtype AddSubgroup.subtype
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeSubtype : ⇑ H.subtype = ((↑) : H → G) :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_subtype Subgroup.coeSubtype
#align add_subgroup.coe_subtype AddSubgroup.coeSubtype
@[to_additive]
theorem subtype_injective : Function.Injective (Subgroup.subtype H) :=
Subtype.coe_injective
#align subgroup.subtype_injective Subgroup.subtype_injective
#align add_subgroup.subtype_injective AddSubgroup.subtype_injective
/-- The inclusion homomorphism from a subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`. -/
@[to_additive "The inclusion homomorphism from an additive subgroup `H` contained in `K` to `K`."]
def inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : H →* K :=
MonoidHom.mk' (fun x => ⟨x, h x.2⟩) fun _ _ => rfl
#align subgroup.inclusion Subgroup.inclusion
#align add_subgroup.inclusion AddSubgroup.inclusion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} {h : H ≤ K} (a : H) : (inclusion h a : G) = a := by
cases a
simp only [inclusion, coe_mk, MonoidHom.mk'_apply]
#align subgroup.coe_inclusion Subgroup.coe_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.coe_inclusion AddSubgroup.coe_inclusion
@[to_additive]
theorem inclusion_injective {H K : Subgroup G} (h : H ≤ K) : Function.Injective <| inclusion h :=
Set.inclusion_injective h
#align subgroup.inclusion_injective Subgroup.inclusion_injective
#align add_subgroup.inclusion_injective AddSubgroup.inclusion_injective
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subtype_comp_inclusion {H K : Subgroup G} (hH : H ≤ K) :
K.subtype.comp (inclusion hH) = H.subtype :=
rfl
#align subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion Subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
#align add_subgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion AddSubgroup.subtype_comp_inclusion
/-- The subgroup `G` of the group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup G` of the `AddGroup G`."]
instance : Top (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := fun _ => Set.mem_univ _ }⟩
/-- The top subgroup is isomorphic to the group.
This is the group version of `Submonoid.topEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simps!)
"The top additive subgroup is isomorphic to the additive group.
This is the additive group version of `AddSubmonoid.topEquiv`."]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Subgroup G) ≃* G :=
Submonoid.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv Subgroup.topEquiv
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv AddSubgroup.topEquiv
#align subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe Subgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_symm_apply_coe AddSubgroup.topEquiv_symm_apply_coe
#align add_subgroup.top_equiv_apply AddSubgroup.topEquiv_apply
/-- The trivial subgroup `{1}` of a group `G`. -/
@[to_additive "The trivial `AddSubgroup` `{0}` of an `AddGroup` `G`."]
instance : Bot (Subgroup G) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : Submonoid G) with inv_mem' := by simp}⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_bot {x : G} : x ∈ (⊥ : Subgroup G) ↔ x = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_bot Subgroup.mem_bot
#align add_subgroup.mem_bot AddSubgroup.mem_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_top (x : G) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subgroup G) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subgroup.mem_top Subgroup.mem_top
#align add_subgroup.mem_top AddSubgroup.mem_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_top Subgroup.coe_top
#align add_subgroup.coe_top AddSubgroup.coe_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subgroup G) : Set G) = {1} :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_bot Subgroup.coe_bot
#align add_subgroup.coe_bot AddSubgroup.coe_bot
@[to_additive]
instance : Unique (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨1⟩, fun g => Subtype.ext g.2⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem top_toSubmonoid : (⊤ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.top_to_submonoid Subgroup.top_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.top_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem bot_toSubmonoid : (⊥ : Subgroup G).toSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align subgroup.bot_to_submonoid Subgroup.bot_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.bot_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_iff_forall : H = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ H, x = (1 : G) :=
toSubmonoid_injective.eq_iff.symm.trans <| Submonoid.eq_bot_iff_forall _
#align subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall AddSubgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton H] : H = ⊥ := by
rw [Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall]
intro y hy
rw [← Subgroup.coe_mk H y hy, Subsingleton.elim (⟨y, hy⟩ : H) 1, Subgroup.coe_one]
#align subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
#align add_subgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton AddSubgroup.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_eq_univ {H : Subgroup G} : (H : Set G) = Set.univ ↔ H = ⊤ :=
(SetLike.ext'_iff.trans (by rfl)).symm
#align subgroup.coe_eq_univ Subgroup.coe_eq_univ
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_univ AddSubgroup.coe_eq_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {H : Subgroup G} : (∃ g : G, (H : Set G) = {g}) ↔ H = ⊥ :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hg⟩ =>
haveI : Subsingleton (H : Set G) := by
rw [hg]
infer_instance
H.eq_bot_of_subsingleton,
fun h => ⟨1, SetLike.ext'_iff.mp h⟩⟩
#align subgroup.coe_eq_singleton Subgroup.coe_eq_singleton
#align add_subgroup.coe_eq_singleton AddSubgroup.coe_eq_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
rw [Subtype.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (fun x => x ∈ H) (1 : H)]
simp
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) [Nontrivial H] :
∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ 1 := by
rwa [← Subgroup.nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot (H : Subgroup G) : Nontrivial H ↔ H ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one, ne_eq, eq_bot_iff_forall]
simp only [ne_eq, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or nontrivial."]
theorem bot_or_nontrivial (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ Nontrivial H := by
have := nontrivial_iff_ne_bot H
tauto
#align subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial Subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_nontrivial AddSubgroup.bot_or_nontrivial
/-- A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a non-identity element. -/
@[to_additive "A subgroup is either the trivial subgroup or contains a nonzero element."]
theorem bot_or_exists_ne_one (H : Subgroup G) : H = ⊥ ∨ ∃ x ∈ H, x ≠ (1 : G) := by
convert H.bot_or_nontrivial
rw [nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
#align subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one
#align add_subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero AddSubgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
lemma ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one {H : Subgroup G} : H ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ a : ↥H, a ≠ 1 := by
rw [← nontrivial_iff_ne_bot, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne_one]
simp only [ne_eq, Subtype.exists, mk_eq_one, exists_prop]
/-- The inf of two subgroups is their intersection. -/
@[to_additive "The inf of two `AddSubgroup`s is their intersection."]
instance : Inf (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun H₁ H₂ =>
{ H₁.toSubmonoid ⊓ H₂.toSubmonoid with
inv_mem' := fun ⟨hx, hx'⟩ => ⟨H₁.inv_mem hx, H₂.inv_mem hx'⟩ }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subgroup G) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subgroup G) : Set G) = (p : Set G) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_inf Subgroup.coe_inf
#align add_subgroup.coe_inf AddSubgroup.coe_inf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subgroup G} {x : G} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subgroup.mem_inf Subgroup.mem_inf
#align add_subgroup.mem_inf AddSubgroup.mem_inf
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subgroup G) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ (⨅ S ∈ s, Subgroup.toSubmonoid S).copy (⋂ S ∈ s, ↑S) (by simp) with
inv_mem' := fun {x} hx =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h => i.inv_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (H : Set (Subgroup G)) : ((sInf H : Subgroup G) : Set G) = ⋂ s ∈ H, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subgroup.coe_Inf Subgroup.coe_sInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_Inf AddSubgroup.coe_sInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {x : G} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subgroup.mem_Inf Subgroup.mem_sInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_Inf AddSubgroup.mem_sInf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} {x : G} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
#align subgroup.mem_infi Subgroup.mem_iInf
#align add_subgroup.mem_infi AddSubgroup.mem_iInf
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} : (↑(⨅ i, S i) : Set G) = ⋂ i, S i := by
simp only [iInf, coe_sInf, Set.biInter_range]
#align subgroup.coe_infi Subgroup.coe_iInf
#align add_subgroup.coe_infi AddSubgroup.coe_iInf
/-- Subgroups of a group form a complete lattice. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup`s of an `AddGroup` form a complete lattice."]
instance : CompleteLattice (Subgroup G) :=
{ completeLatticeOfInf (Subgroup G) fun _s =>
IsGLB.of_image SetLike.coe_subset_coe isGLB_biInf with
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun S _x hx => (mem_bot.1 hx).symm ▸ S.one_mem
top := ⊤
le_top := fun _S x _hx => mem_top x
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _a _b _c ha hb _x hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
inf_le_left := fun _a _b _x => And.left
inf_le_right := fun _a _b _x => And.right }
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_left {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : S ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_left; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_left Subgroup.mem_sup_left
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_left AddSubgroup.mem_sup_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sup_right {S T : Subgroup G} : ∀ {x : G}, x ∈ T → x ∈ S ⊔ T :=
have : T ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_right; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_sup_right Subgroup.mem_sup_right
#align add_subgroup.mem_sup_right AddSubgroup.mem_sup_right
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_sup {S T : Subgroup G} {x y : G} (hx : x ∈ S) (hy : y ∈ T) : x * y ∈ S ⊔ T :=
(S ⊔ T).mul_mem (mem_sup_left hx) (mem_sup_right hy)
#align subgroup.mul_mem_sup Subgroup.mul_mem_sup
#align add_subgroup.add_mem_sup AddSubgroup.add_mem_sup
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_mem {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subgroup G} (i : ι) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ S i → x ∈ iSup S :=
have : S i ≤ iSup S := le_iSup _ _; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem Subgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_supr_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_iSup_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sSup_of_mem {S : Set (Subgroup G)} {s : Subgroup G} (hs : s ∈ S) :
∀ {x : G}, x ∈ s → x ∈ sSup S :=
have : s ≤ sSup S := le_sSup hs; fun h ↦ this h
#align subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem Subgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
#align add_subgroup.mem_Sup_of_mem AddSubgroup.mem_sSup_of_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton (Subgroup G) ↔ Subsingleton G :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨fun x y =>
have : ∀ i : G, i = 1 := fun i =>
mem_bot.mp <| Subsingleton.elim (⊤ : Subgroup G) ⊥ ▸ mem_top i
(this x).trans (this y).symm⟩,
fun h => ⟨fun x y => Subgroup.ext fun i => Subsingleton.elim 1 i ▸ by simp [Subgroup.one_mem]⟩⟩
#align subgroup.subsingleton_iff Subgroup.subsingleton_iff
#align add_subgroup.subsingleton_iff AddSubgroup.subsingleton_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) ↔ Nontrivial G :=
not_iff_not.mp
((not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff).trans
not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton.symm)
#align subgroup.nontrivial_iff Subgroup.nontrivial_iff
#align add_subgroup.nontrivial_iff AddSubgroup.nontrivial_iff
@[to_additive]
instance [Subsingleton G] : Unique (Subgroup G) :=
⟨⟨⊥⟩, fun a => @Subsingleton.elim _ (subsingleton_iff.mpr ‹_›) a _⟩
@[to_additive]
instance [Nontrivial G] : Nontrivial (Subgroup G) :=
nontrivial_iff.mpr ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_top_iff' : H = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x : G, x ∈ H :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h m => h <| mem_top m, fun h m _ => h m⟩
#align subgroup.eq_top_iff' Subgroup.eq_top_iff'
#align add_subgroup.eq_top_iff' AddSubgroup.eq_top_iff'
/-- The `Subgroup` generated by a set. -/
@[to_additive "The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set"]
def closure (k : Set G) : Subgroup G :=
sInf { K | k ⊆ K }
#align subgroup.closure Subgroup.closure
#align add_subgroup.closure AddSubgroup.closure
variable {k : Set G}
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closure {x : G} : x ∈ closure k ↔ ∀ K : Subgroup G, k ⊆ K → x ∈ K :=
mem_sInf
#align subgroup.mem_closure Subgroup.mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure AddSubgroup.mem_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by a set includes the set. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike]))
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by a set includes the set."]
theorem subset_closure : k ⊆ closure k := fun _ hx => mem_closure.2 fun _ hK => hK hx
#align subgroup.subset_closure Subgroup.subset_closure
#align add_subgroup.subset_closure AddSubgroup.subset_closure
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : G} (hP : P ∉ closure k) : P ∉ k := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure Subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
#align add_subgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure AddSubgroup.not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
open Set
/-- A subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"An additive subgroup `K` includes `closure k` if and only if it includes `k`"]
theorem closure_le : closure k ≤ K ↔ k ⊆ K :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => sInf_le h⟩
#align subgroup.closure_le Subgroup.closure_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_le AddSubgroup.closure_le
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_of_le (h₁ : k ⊆ K) (h₂ : K ≤ closure k) : closure k = K :=
le_antisymm ((closure_le <| K).2 h₁) h₂
#align subgroup.closure_eq_of_le Subgroup.closure_eq_of_le
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_of_le AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le
/-- An induction principle for closure membership. If `p` holds for `1` and all elements of `k`, and
is preserved under multiplication and inverse, then `p` holds for all elements of the closure
of `k`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership. If `p`
holds for `0` and all elements of `k`, and is preserved under addition and inverses, then `p`
holds for all elements of the additive closure of `k`."]
theorem closure_induction {p : G → Prop} {x} (h : x ∈ closure k) (mem : ∀ x ∈ k, p x) (one : p 1)
(mul : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (inv : ∀ x, p x → p x⁻¹) : p x :=
(@closure_le _ _ ⟨⟨⟨setOf p, fun {x y} ↦ mul x y⟩, one⟩, fun {x} ↦ inv x⟩ k).2 mem h
#align subgroup.closure_induction Subgroup.closure_induction
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction AddSubgroup.closure_induction
/-- A dependent version of `Subgroup.closure_induction`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim) "A dependent version of `AddSubgroup.closure_induction`. "]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ closure k → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ k), p x (subset_closure h)) (one : p 1 (one_mem _))
(mul : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x * y) (mul_mem hx hy))
(inv : ∀ x hx, p x hx → p x⁻¹ (inv_mem hx)) {x} (hx : x ∈ closure k) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hc : p x hx) => hc
exact
closure_induction hx (fun x hx => ⟨_, mem x hx⟩) ⟨_, one⟩
(fun x y ⟨hx', hx⟩ ⟨hy', hy⟩ => ⟨_, mul _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩) fun x ⟨hx', hx⟩ => ⟨_, inv _ _ hx⟩
#align subgroup.closure_induction' Subgroup.closure_induction'
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction' AddSubgroup.closure_induction'
/-- An induction principle for closure membership for predicates with two arguments. -/
@[to_additive (attr := elab_as_elim)
"An induction principle for additive closure membership, for
predicates with two arguments."]
theorem closure_induction₂ {p : G → G → Prop} {x} {y : G} (hx : x ∈ closure k) (hy : y ∈ closure k)
(Hk : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, p x y) (H1_left : ∀ x, p 1 x) (H1_right : ∀ x, p x 1)
(Hmul_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ * x₂) y)
(Hmul_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ * y₂)) (Hinv_left : ∀ x y, p x y → p x⁻¹ y)
(Hinv_right : ∀ x y, p x y → p x y⁻¹) : p x y :=
closure_induction hx
(fun x xk => closure_induction hy (Hk x xk) (H1_right x) (Hmul_right x) (Hinv_right x))
(H1_left y) (fun z z' => Hmul_left z z' y) fun z => Hinv_left z y
#align subgroup.closure_induction₂ Subgroup.closure_induction₂
#align add_subgroup.closure_induction₂ AddSubgroup.closure_induction₂
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_closure_coe_preimage {k : Set G} : closure (((↑) : closure k → G) ⁻¹' k) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x =>
Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ => by
refine closure_induction' (fun g hg => ?_) ?_ (fun g₁ g₂ hg₁ hg₂ => ?_) (fun g hg => ?_) hx
· exact subset_closure hg
· exact one_mem _
· exact mul_mem
· exact inv_mem
#align subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage Subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
#align add_subgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage AddSubgroup.closure_closure_coe_preimage
/-- If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is a commutative group. -/
@[to_additive
"If all the elements of a set `s` commute, then `closure s` is an additive
commutative group."]
def closureCommGroupOfComm {k : Set G} (hcomm : ∀ x ∈ k, ∀ y ∈ k, x * y = y * x) :
CommGroup (closure k) :=
{ (closure k).toGroup with
mul_comm := fun x y => by
ext
simp only [Subgroup.coe_mul]
refine
closure_induction₂ x.prop y.prop hcomm (fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x => by simp only [mul_one, one_mul])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc])
(fun x y z h₁ h₂ => by rw [← mul_assoc, h₁, mul_assoc, h₂, ← mul_assoc])
(fun x y h => by
rw [inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, h, mul_assoc, mul_inv_self, mul_one])
fun x y h => by
rw [mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_assoc, h, ← mul_assoc, inv_mul_self, one_mul] }
#align subgroup.closure_comm_group_of_comm Subgroup.closureCommGroupOfComm
#align add_subgroup.closure_add_comm_group_of_comm AddSubgroup.closureAddCommGroupOfComm
variable (G)
/-- `closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set. -/
@[to_additive "`closure` forms a Galois insertion with the coercion to set."]
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@closure G _) (↑) where
choice s _ := closure s
gc s t := @closure_le _ _ t s
le_l_u _s := subset_closure
choice_eq _s _h := rfl
#align subgroup.gi Subgroup.gi
#align add_subgroup.gi AddSubgroup.gi
variable {G}
/-- Subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`. -/
@[to_additive
"Additive subgroup closure of a set is monotone in its argument: if `h ⊆ k`,
then `closure h ≤ closure k`"]
theorem closure_mono ⦃h k : Set G⦄ (h' : h ⊆ k) : closure h ≤ closure k :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.monotone_l h'
#align subgroup.closure_mono Subgroup.closure_mono
#align add_subgroup.closure_mono AddSubgroup.closure_mono
/-- Closure of a subgroup `K` equals `K`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "Additive closure of an additive subgroup `K` equals `K`"]
theorem closure_eq : closure (K : Set G) = K :=
(Subgroup.gi G).l_u_eq K
#align subgroup.closure_eq Subgroup.closure_eq
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq AddSubgroup.closure_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set G) = ⊥ :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_bot
#align subgroup.closure_empty Subgroup.closure_empty
#align add_subgroup.closure_empty AddSubgroup.closure_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set G) = ⊤ :=
@coe_top G _ ▸ closure_eq ⊤
#align subgroup.closure_univ Subgroup.closure_univ
#align add_subgroup.closure_univ AddSubgroup.closure_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_union (s t : Set G) : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ⊔ closure t :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_sup
#align subgroup.closure_union Subgroup.closure_union
#align add_subgroup.closure_union AddSubgroup.closure_union
@[to_additive]
theorem sup_eq_closure (H H' : Subgroup G) : H ⊔ H' = closure ((H : Set G) ∪ (H' : Set G)) := by
simp_rw [closure_union, closure_eq]
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set G) : closure (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, closure (s i) :=
(Subgroup.gi G).gc.l_iSup
#align subgroup.closure_Union Subgroup.closure_iUnion
#align add_subgroup.closure_Union AddSubgroup.closure_iUnion
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem closure_eq_bot_iff : closure k = ⊥ ↔ k ⊆ {1} := le_bot_iff.symm.trans <| closure_le _
#align subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff Subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff AddSubgroup.closure_eq_bot_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem iSup_eq_closure {ι : Sort*} (p : ι → Subgroup G) :
⨆ i, p i = closure (⋃ i, (p i : Set G)) := by simp_rw [closure_iUnion, closure_eq]
#align subgroup.supr_eq_closure Subgroup.iSup_eq_closure
#align add_subgroup.supr_eq_closure AddSubgroup.iSup_eq_closure
/-- The subgroup generated by an element of a group equals the set of integer number powers of
the element. -/
@[to_additive
"The `AddSubgroup` generated by an element of an `AddGroup` equals the set of
natural number multiples of the element."]
theorem mem_closure_singleton {x y : G} : y ∈ closure ({x} : Set G) ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x ^ n = y := by
refine
⟨fun hy => closure_induction hy ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
hn ▸ zpow_mem (subset_closure <| mem_singleton x) n⟩
· intro y hy
rw [eq_of_mem_singleton hy]
exact ⟨1, zpow_one x⟩
· exact ⟨0, zpow_zero x⟩
· rintro _ _ ⟨n, rfl⟩ ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n + m, zpow_add x n m⟩
rintro _ ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨-n, zpow_neg x n⟩
#align subgroup.mem_closure_singleton Subgroup.mem_closure_singleton
#align add_subgroup.mem_closure_singleton AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_singleton_one : closure ({1} : Set G) = ⊥ := by
simp [eq_bot_iff_forall, mem_closure_singleton]
#align subgroup.closure_singleton_one Subgroup.closure_singleton_one
#align add_subgroup.closure_singleton_zero AddSubgroup.closure_singleton_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem le_closure_toSubmonoid (S : Set G) : Submonoid.closure S ≤ (closure S).toSubmonoid :=
Submonoid.closure_le.2 subset_closure
#align subgroup.le_closure_to_submonoid Subgroup.le_closure_toSubmonoid
#align add_subgroup.le_closure_to_add_submonoid AddSubgroup.le_closure_toAddSubmonoid
@[to_additive]
theorem closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top {S : Set G} (h : Submonoid.closure S = ⊤) :
closure S = ⊤ :=
(eq_top_iff' _).2 fun _ => le_closure_toSubmonoid _ <| h.symm ▸ trivial
#align subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top Subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top
#align add_subgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top AddSubgroup.closure_eq_top_of_mclosure_eq_top
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subgroup/Basic.lean | 1,300 | 1,311 | theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {K : ι → Subgroup G} (hK : Directed (· ≤ ·) K)
{x : G} : x ∈ (iSup K : Subgroup G) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ K i := by |
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup K i hi⟩
suffices x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (K i : Set G)) → ∃ i, x ∈ K i by
simpa only [closure_iUnion, closure_eq (K _)] using this
refine fun hx ↦ closure_induction hx (fun _ ↦ mem_iUnion.1) ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact hι.elim fun i ↦ ⟨i, (K i).one_mem⟩
· rintro x y ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases hK i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩
exact ⟨k, mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩
· rintro _ ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨i, inv_mem hi⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integral
#align_import ring_theory.ideal.over from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"198cb64d5c961e1a8d0d3e219feb7058d5353861"
/-!
# Ideals over/under ideals
This file concerns ideals lying over other ideals.
Let `f : R →+* S` be a ring homomorphism (typically a ring extension), `I` an ideal of `R` and
`J` an ideal of `S`. We say `J` lies over `I` (and `I` under `J`) if `I` is the `f`-preimage of `J`.
This is expressed here by writing `I = J.comap f`.
## Implementation notes
The proofs of the `comap_ne_bot` and `comap_lt_comap` families use an approach
specific for their situation: we construct an element in `I.comap f` from the
coefficients of a minimal polynomial.
Once mathlib has more material on the localization at a prime ideal, the results
can be proven using more general going-up/going-down theory.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
namespace Ideal
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
open Submodule
section CommRing
variable {S : Type*} [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S} {I J : Ideal S}
theorem coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem_of_eval_mem {r : S} (hr : r ∈ I) {p : R[X]}
(hp : p.eval₂ f r ∈ I) : p.coeff 0 ∈ I.comap f := by
rw [← p.divX_mul_X_add, eval₂_add, eval₂_C, eval₂_mul, eval₂_X] at hp
refine mem_comap.mpr ((I.add_mem_iff_right ?_).mp hp)
exact I.mul_mem_left _ hr
#align ideal.coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem_of_eval_mem Ideal.coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem_of_eval_mem
theorem coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem {r : S} (hr : r ∈ I) {p : R[X]} (hp : p.eval₂ f r = 0) :
p.coeff 0 ∈ I.comap f :=
coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem_of_eval_mem hr (hp.symm ▸ I.zero_mem)
#align ideal.coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem Ideal.coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Over.lean | 56 | 70 | theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero_mem_comap_of_non_zero_divisor_root_mem {r : S}
(r_non_zero_divisor : ∀ {x}, x * r = 0 → x = 0) (hr : r ∈ I) {p : R[X]} :
p ≠ 0 → p.eval₂ f r = 0 → ∃ i, p.coeff i ≠ 0 ∧ p.coeff i ∈ I.comap f := by |
refine p.recOnHorner ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro h
contradiction
· intro p a coeff_eq_zero a_ne_zero _ _ hp
refine ⟨0, ?_, coeff_zero_mem_comap_of_root_mem hr hp⟩
simp [coeff_eq_zero, a_ne_zero]
· intro p p_nonzero ih _ hp
rw [eval₂_mul, eval₂_X] at hp
obtain ⟨i, hi, mem⟩ := ih p_nonzero (r_non_zero_divisor hp)
refine ⟨i + 1, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp [hi, mem]
· simpa [hi] using mem
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Limits
#align_import algebra.homology.image_to_kernel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"618ea3d5c99240cd7000d8376924906a148bf9ff"
/-!
# Image-to-kernel comparison maps
Whenever `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfy `w : f ≫ g = 0`,
we have `image_le_kernel f g w : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g`
(assuming the appropriate images and kernels exist).
`imageToKernel f g w` is the corresponding morphism between objects in `C`.
We define `homology' f g w` of such a pair as the cokernel of `imageToKernel f g w`.
Note: As part of the transition to the new homology API, `homology` is temporarily
renamed `homology'`. It is planned that this definition shall be removed and replaced by
`ShortComplex.homology`.
-/
universe v u w
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [HasZeroMorphisms V]
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
theorem image_le_kernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : imageSubobject f ≤ kernelSubobject g :=
imageSubobject_le_mk _ _ (kernel.lift _ _ w) (by simp)
#align image_le_kernel image_le_kernel
/-- The canonical morphism `imageSubobject f ⟶ kernelSubobject g` when `f ≫ g = 0`.
-/
def imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) : (imageSubobject f : V) ⟶ (kernelSubobject g : V) :=
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (image_le_kernel _ _ w)
#align image_to_kernel imageToKernel
instance (w : f ≫ g = 0) : Mono (imageToKernel f g w) := by
dsimp only [imageToKernel]
infer_instance
/-- Prefer `imageToKernel`. -/
@[simp]
theorem subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) (h) :
Subobject.ofLE (imageSubobject f) (kernelSubobject g) h = imageToKernel f g w :=
rfl
#align subobject_of_le_as_image_to_kernel subobject_ofLE_as_imageToKernel
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
-- a more suitable lemma is added below
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem imageToKernel_arrow (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f g w ≫ (kernelSubobject g).arrow = (imageSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [imageToKernel]
#align image_to_kernel_arrow imageToKernel_arrow
@[simp]
lemma imageToKernel_arrow_apply [ConcreteCategory V] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
(x : (forget V).obj (Subobject.underlying.obj (imageSubobject f))) :
(kernelSubobject g).arrow (imageToKernel f g w x) =
(imageSubobject f).arrow x := by
rw [← comp_apply, imageToKernel_arrow]
-- This is less useful as a `simp` lemma than it initially appears,
-- as it "loses" the information the morphism factors through the image.
theorem factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
factorThruImageSubobject f ≫ imageToKernel f g w = factorThruKernelSubobject g f w := by
ext
simp
#align factor_thru_image_subobject_comp_image_to_kernel factorThruImageSubobject_comp_imageToKernel
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : B ⟶ C)
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_zero_left [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] {w} :
imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g w = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_zero_left imageToKernel_zero_left
theorem imageToKernel_zero_right [HasImages V] {w} :
imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) w =
(imageSubobject f).arrow ≫ inv (kernelSubobject (0 : B ⟶ C)).arrow := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_zero_right imageToKernel_zero_right
section
variable [HasKernels V] [HasImages V]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_right {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) (by simp [reassoc_of% w]) =
imageToKernel f g w ≫ Subobject.ofLE _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_le g h) := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_right imageToKernel_comp_right
theorem imageToKernel_comp_left {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) (w : f ≫ g = 0) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g (by simp [w]) =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫ imageToKernel f g w := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_left imageToKernel_comp_left
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_mono {D : V} (h : C ⟶ D) [Mono h] (w) :
imageToKernel f (g ≫ h) w =
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_mono h).mp (by simpa using w : (f ≫ g) ≫ h = 0 ≫ h)) ≫
(Subobject.isoOfEq _ _ (kernelSubobject_comp_mono g h)).inv := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_mono imageToKernel_comp_mono
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_epi_comp {Z : V} (h : Z ⟶ A) [Epi h] (w) :
imageToKernel (h ≫ f) g w =
Subobject.ofLE _ _ (imageSubobject_comp_le h f) ≫
imageToKernel f g ((cancel_epi h).mp (by simpa using w : h ≫ f ≫ g = h ≫ 0)) := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_epi_comp imageToKernel_epi_comp
end
@[simp]
theorem imageToKernel_comp_hom_inv_comp [HasEqualizers V] [HasImages V] {Z : V} {i : B ≅ Z} (w) :
imageToKernel (f ≫ i.hom) (i.inv ≫ g) w =
(imageSubobjectCompIso _ _).hom ≫
imageToKernel f g (by simpa using w) ≫ (kernelSubobjectIsoComp i.inv g).inv := by
ext
simp
#align image_to_kernel_comp_hom_inv_comp imageToKernel_comp_hom_inv_comp
open ZeroObject
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --0--> B --g--> C`, where `g` is a mono is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono [HasKernels V] [HasZeroObject V] [Mono g] :
Epi (imageToKernel (0 : A ⟶ B) g (by simp)) :=
epi_of_target_iso_zero _ (kernelSubobjectIso g ≪≫ kernel.ofMono g)
#align image_to_kernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono imageToKernel_epi_of_zero_of_mono
/-- `imageToKernel` for `A --f--> B --0--> C`, where `g` is an epi is itself an epi
(i.e. the sequence is exact at `B`).
-/
instance imageToKernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero [HasImages V] [Epi f] :
Epi (imageToKernel f (0 : B ⟶ C) (by simp)) := by
simp only [imageToKernel_zero_right]
haveI := epi_image_of_epi f
rw [← imageSubobject_arrow]
exact @epi_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ (epi_comp _ _) _ _
#align image_to_kernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero imageToKernel_epi_of_epi_of_zero
end
section
variable {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g]
/-- The homology of a pair of morphisms `f : A ⟶ B` and `g : B ⟶ C` satisfying `f ≫ g = 0`
is the cokernel of the `imageToKernel` morphism for `f` and `g`.
-/
def homology' {A B C : V} (f : A ⟶ B) [HasImage f] (g : B ⟶ C) [HasKernel g] (w : f ≫ g = 0)
[HasCokernel (imageToKernel f g w)] : V :=
cokernel (imageToKernel f g w)
#align homology homology'
section
variable (w : f ≫ g = 0) [HasCokernel (imageToKernel f g w)]
/-- The morphism from cycles to homology. -/
def homology'.π : (kernelSubobject g : V) ⟶ homology' f g w :=
cokernel.π _
#align homology.π homology'.π
@[simp]
theorem homology'.condition : imageToKernel f g w ≫ homology'.π f g w = 0 :=
cokernel.condition _
#align homology.condition homology'.condition
/-- To construct a map out of homology, it suffices to construct a map out of the cycles
which vanishes on boundaries.
-/
def homology'.desc {D : V} (k : (kernelSubobject g : V) ⟶ D) (p : imageToKernel f g w ≫ k = 0) :
homology' f g w ⟶ D :=
cokernel.desc _ k p
#align homology.desc homology'.desc
-- Porting note: removed elementwise attribute which does not seem to be helpful here
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/ImageToKernel.lean | 214 | 216 | theorem homology'.π_desc {D : V} (k : (kernelSubobject g : V) ⟶ D)
(p : imageToKernel f g w ≫ k = 0) : homology'.π f g w ≫ homology'.desc f g w k p = k := by |
simp [homology'.π, homology'.desc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Pierre-Alexandre Bazin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Pierre-Alexandre Bazin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Isomorphisms
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Torsion
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.module.torsion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cdc34484a07418af43daf8198beaf5c00324bca8"
/-!
# Torsion submodules
## Main definitions
* `torsionOf R M x` : the torsion ideal of `x`, containing all `a` such that `a • x = 0`.
* `Submodule.torsionBy R M a` : the `a`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such
that `a • x = 0`.
* `Submodule.torsionBySet R M s` : the submodule containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0` for all `a` in `s`.
* `Submodule.torsion' R M S` : the `S`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such
that `a • x = 0` for some `a` in `S`.
* `Submodule.torsion R M` : the torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0` for some non-zero-divisor `a` in `R`.
* `Module.IsTorsionBy R M a` : the property that defines an `a`-torsion module. Similarly,
`IsTorsionBySet`, `IsTorsion'` and `IsTorsion`.
* `Module.IsTorsionBySet.module` : Creates an `R ⧸ I`-module from an `R`-module that
`IsTorsionBySet R _ I`.
## Main statements
* `quot_torsionOf_equiv_span_singleton` : isomorphism between the span of an element of `M` and
the quotient by its torsion ideal.
* `torsion' R M S` and `torsion R M` are submodules.
* `torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span` : torsion by a set is torsion by the ideal generated by it.
* `Submodule.torsionBy_is_torsionBy` : the `a`-torsion submodule is an `a`-torsion module.
Similar lemmas for `torsion'` and `torsion`.
* `Submodule.torsionBy_isInternal` : a `∏ i, p i`-torsion module is the internal direct sum of its
`p i`-torsion submodules when the `p i` are pairwise coprime. A more general version with coprime
ideals is `Submodule.torsionBySet_is_internal`.
* `Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors_iff_torsion_bot` : a module over a domain has
`NoZeroSMulDivisors` (that is, there is no non-zero `a`, `x` such that `a • x = 0`)
iff its torsion submodule is trivial.
* `Submodule.QuotientTorsion.torsion_eq_bot` : quotienting by the torsion submodule makes the
torsion submodule of the new module trivial. If `R` is a domain, we can derive an instance
`Submodule.QuotientTorsion.noZeroSMulDivisors : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (M ⧸ torsion R M)`.
## Notation
* The notions are defined for a `CommSemiring R` and a `Module R M`. Some additional hypotheses on
`R` and `M` are required by some lemmas.
* The letters `a`, `b`, ... are used for scalars (in `R`), while `x`, `y`, ... are used for vectors
(in `M`).
## Tags
Torsion, submodule, module, quotient
-/
namespace Ideal
section TorsionOf
variable (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- The torsion ideal of `x`, containing all `a` such that `a • x = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionOf (x : M) : Ideal R :=
-- Porting note (#11036): broken dot notation on LinearMap.ker Lean4#1910
LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x)
#align ideal.torsion_of Ideal.torsionOf
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_zero : torsionOf R M (0 : M) = ⊤ := by simp [torsionOf]
#align ideal.torsion_of_zero Ideal.torsionOf_zero
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionOf_iff (x : M) (a : R) : a ∈ torsionOf R M x ↔ a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.mem_torsion_of_iff Ideal.mem_torsionOf_iff
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_eq_top_iff (m : M) : torsionOf R M m = ⊤ ↔ m = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
rw [← one_smul R m, ← mem_torsionOf_iff m (1 : R), h]
exact Submodule.mem_top
#align ideal.torsion_of_eq_top_iff Ideal.torsionOf_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem torsionOf_eq_bot_iff_of_noZeroSMulDivisors [Nontrivial R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (m : M) :
torsionOf R M m = ⊥ ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h contra => ?_, fun h => (Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mpr fun r hr => ?_⟩
· rw [contra, torsionOf_zero] at h
exact bot_ne_top.symm h
· rw [mem_torsionOf_iff, smul_eq_zero] at hr
tauto
#align ideal.torsion_of_eq_bot_iff_of_no_zero_smul_divisors Ideal.torsionOf_eq_bot_iff_of_noZeroSMulDivisors
/-- See also `CompleteLattice.Independent.linearIndependent` which provides the same conclusion
but requires the stronger hypothesis `NoZeroSMulDivisors R M`. -/
theorem CompleteLattice.Independent.linear_independent' {ι R M : Type*} {v : ι → M} [Ring R]
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (hv : CompleteLattice.Independent fun i => R ∙ v i)
(h_ne_zero : ∀ i, Ideal.torsionOf R M (v i) = ⊥) : LinearIndependent R v := by
refine linearIndependent_iff_not_smul_mem_span.mpr fun i r hi => ?_
replace hv := CompleteLattice.independent_def.mp hv i
simp only [iSup_subtype', ← Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup (ι := Subtype _), disjoint_iff] at hv
have : r • v i ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) := by
rw [← hv, Submodule.mem_inf]
refine ⟨Submodule.mem_span_singleton.mpr ⟨r, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
convert hi
ext
simp
rw [← Submodule.mem_bot R, ← h_ne_zero i]
simpa using this
#align ideal.complete_lattice.independent.linear_independent' Ideal.CompleteLattice.Independent.linear_independent'
end TorsionOf
section
variable (R M : Type*) [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
/-- The span of `x` in `M` is isomorphic to `R` quotiented by the torsion ideal of `x`. -/
noncomputable def quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton (x : M) : (R ⧸ torsionOf R M x) ≃ₗ[R] R ∙ x :=
(LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x).quotKerEquivRange.trans <|
LinearEquiv.ofEq _ _ (LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range R M x).symm
#align ideal.quot_torsion_of_equiv_span_singleton Ideal.quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton_apply_mk (x : M) (a : R) :
quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton R M x (Submodule.Quotient.mk a) =
a • ⟨x, Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x⟩ :=
rfl
#align ideal.quot_torsion_of_equiv_span_singleton_apply_mk Ideal.quotTorsionOfEquivSpanSingleton_apply_mk
end
end Ideal
open nonZeroDivisors
section Defs
variable (R M : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
namespace Submodule
/-- The `a`-torsion submodule for `a` in `R`, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that
`a • x = 0`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionBy (a : R) : Submodule R M :=
-- Porting note (#11036): broken dot notation on LinearMap.ker Lean4#1910
LinearMap.ker (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M a)
#align submodule.torsion_by Submodule.torsionBy
/-- The submodule containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for all `a` in `s`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsionBySet (s : Set R) : Submodule R M :=
sInf (torsionBy R M '' s)
#align submodule.torsion_by_set Submodule.torsionBySet
-- Porting note: torsion' had metavariables and factoring out this fixed it
-- perhaps there is a better fix
/-- The additive submonoid of all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0`
for some `a` in `S`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsion'AddSubMonoid (S : Type*) [CommMonoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] :
AddSubmonoid M where
carrier := { x | ∃ a : S, a • x = 0 }
add_mem' := by
intro x y ⟨a,hx⟩ ⟨b,hy⟩
use b * a
rw [smul_add, mul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul, hx, hy, smul_zero, smul_zero, add_zero]
zero_mem' := ⟨1, smul_zero 1⟩
/-- The `S`-torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for some
`a` in `S`. -/
@[simps!]
def torsion' (S : Type*) [CommMonoid S] [DistribMulAction S M] [SMulCommClass S R M] :
Submodule R M :=
{ torsion'AddSubMonoid M S with
smul_mem' := fun a x ⟨b, h⟩ => ⟨b, by rw [smul_comm, h, smul_zero]⟩}
#align submodule.torsion' Submodule.torsion'
/-- The torsion submodule, containing all elements `x` of `M` such that `a • x = 0` for some
non-zero-divisor `a` in `R`. -/
abbrev torsion :=
torsion' R M R⁰
#align submodule.torsion Submodule.torsion
end Submodule
namespace Module
/-- An `a`-torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBy (a : R) :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, a • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion_by Module.IsTorsionBy
/-- A module where every element is `a`-torsion for all `a` in `s`. -/
abbrev IsTorsionBySet (s : Set R) :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄ ⦃a : s⦄, (a : R) • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion_by_set Module.IsTorsionBySet
/-- An `S`-torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion for some `a` in `S`. -/
abbrev IsTorsion' (S : Type*) [SMul S M] :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, ∃ a : S, a • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion' Module.IsTorsion'
/-- A torsion module is a module where every element is `a`-torsion for some non-zero-divisor `a`.
-/
abbrev IsTorsion :=
∀ ⦃x : M⦄, ∃ a : R⁰, a • x = 0
#align module.is_torsion Module.IsTorsion
theorem isTorsionBySet_annihilator : IsTorsionBySet R M (Module.annihilator R M) :=
fun _ r ↦ Module.mem_annihilator.mp r.2 _
end Module
end Defs
lemma isSMulRegular_iff_torsionBy_eq_bot {R} (M : Type*)
[CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (r : R) :
IsSMulRegular M r ↔ Submodule.torsionBy R M r = ⊥ :=
Iff.symm (DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R M r).ker_eq_bot
variable {R M : Type*}
section
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (s : Set R) (a : R)
namespace Submodule
@[simp]
theorem smul_torsionBy (x : torsionBy R M a) : a • x = 0 :=
Subtype.ext x.prop
#align submodule.smul_torsion_by Submodule.smul_torsionBy
@[simp]
theorem smul_coe_torsionBy (x : torsionBy R M a) : a • (x : M) = 0 :=
x.prop
#align submodule.smul_coe_torsion_by Submodule.smul_coe_torsionBy
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionBy_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsionBy R M a ↔ a • x = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_torsion_by_iff Submodule.mem_torsionBy_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_torsionBySet_iff (x : M) : x ∈ torsionBySet R M s ↔ ∀ a : s, (a : R) • x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ⟨a, ha⟩ => mem_sInf.mp h _ (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ ha), fun h => mem_sInf.mpr ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact h ⟨a, ha⟩
#align submodule.mem_torsion_by_set_iff Submodule.mem_torsionBySet_iff
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_singleton_eq : torsionBySet R M {a} = torsionBy R M a := by
ext x
simp only [mem_torsionBySet_iff, SetCoe.forall, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.mem_singleton_iff,
forall_eq, mem_torsionBy_iff]
#align submodule.torsion_by_singleton_eq Submodule.torsionBySet_singleton_eq
theorem torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset {s t : Set R} (st : s ⊆ t) :
torsionBySet R M t ≤ torsionBySet R M s :=
sInf_le_sInf fun _ ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ⟨a, st ha, h⟩
#align submodule.torsion_by_set_le_torsion_by_set_of_subset Submodule.torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset
/-- Torsion by a set is torsion by the ideal generated by it. -/
theorem torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span :
torsionBySet R M s = torsionBySet R M (Ideal.span s) := by
refine le_antisymm (fun x hx => ?_) (torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset subset_span)
rw [mem_torsionBySet_iff] at hx ⊢
suffices Ideal.span s ≤ Ideal.torsionOf R M x by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
exact this ha
rw [Ideal.span_le]
exact fun a ha => hx ⟨a, ha⟩
#align submodule.torsion_by_set_eq_torsion_by_span Submodule.torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span
theorem torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq : torsionBySet R M (R ∙ a) = torsionBy R M a :=
(torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span _).symm.trans <| torsionBySet_singleton_eq _
#align submodule.torsion_by_span_singleton_eq Submodule.torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq
theorem torsionBy_le_torsionBy_of_dvd (a b : R) (dvd : a ∣ b) :
torsionBy R M a ≤ torsionBy R M b := by
rw [← torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq, ← torsionBySet_singleton_eq]
apply torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset
rintro c (rfl : c = b); exact Ideal.mem_span_singleton.mpr dvd
#align submodule.torsion_by_le_torsion_by_of_dvd Submodule.torsionBy_le_torsionBy_of_dvd
@[simp]
theorem torsionBy_one : torsionBy R M 1 = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.mpr fun _ h => by
rw [mem_torsionBy_iff, one_smul] at h
exact h
#align submodule.torsion_by_one Submodule.torsionBy_one
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_univ : torsionBySet R M Set.univ = ⊥ := by
rw [eq_bot_iff, ← torsionBy_one, ← torsionBySet_singleton_eq]
exact torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset fun _ _ => trivial
#align submodule.torsion_by_univ Submodule.torsionBySet_univ
end Submodule
open Submodule
namespace Module
@[simp]
theorem isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff : IsTorsionBySet R M {a} ↔ IsTorsionBy R M a := by
refine ⟨fun h x => @h _ ⟨_, Set.mem_singleton _⟩, fun h x => ?_⟩
rintro ⟨b, rfl : b = a⟩; exact @h _
#align module.is_torsion_by_singleton_iff Module.isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ Submodule.torsionBySet R M s = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => eq_top_iff.mpr fun _ _ => (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mpr <| @h _, fun h x => by
rw [← mem_torsionBySet_iff, h]
trivial⟩
#align module.is_torsion_by_set_iff_torsion_by_set_eq_top Module.isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top
/-- An `a`-torsion module is a module whose `a`-torsion submodule is the full space. -/
theorem isTorsionBy_iff_torsionBy_eq_top : IsTorsionBy R M a ↔ torsionBy R M a = ⊤ := by
rw [← torsionBySet_singleton_eq, ← isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff,
isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top]
#align module.is_torsion_by_iff_torsion_by_eq_top Module.isTorsionBy_iff_torsionBy_eq_top
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ IsTorsionBySet R M (Ideal.span s) := by
rw [isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top, isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top,
torsionBySet_eq_torsionBySet_span]
#align module.is_torsion_by_set_iff_is_torsion_by_span Module.isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span
theorem isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff : IsTorsionBySet R M (R ∙ a) ↔ IsTorsionBy R M a :=
(isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span _).symm.trans <| isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff _
#align module.is_torsion_by_span_singleton_iff Module.isTorsionBySet_span_singleton_iff
theorem isTorsionBySet_iff_subseteq_ker_lsmul :
IsTorsionBySet R M s ↔ s ⊆ LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.lsmul R M) where
mp h r hr := LinearMap.mem_ker.mpr <| LinearMap.ext fun x => @h x ⟨r, hr⟩
mpr | h, x, ⟨_, hr⟩ => DFunLike.congr_fun (LinearMap.mem_ker.mp (h hr)) x
theorem isTorsionBy_iff_mem_ker_lsmul :
IsTorsionBy R M a ↔ a ∈ LinearMap.ker (LinearMap.lsmul R M) :=
Iff.symm LinearMap.ext_iff
end Module
namespace Submodule
open Module
theorem torsionBySet_isTorsionBySet : IsTorsionBySet R (torsionBySet R M s) s :=
fun ⟨_, hx⟩ a => Subtype.ext <| (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mp hx a
#align submodule.torsion_by_set_is_torsion_by_set Submodule.torsionBySet_isTorsionBySet
/-- The `a`-torsion submodule is an `a`-torsion module. -/
theorem torsionBy_isTorsionBy : IsTorsionBy R (torsionBy R M a) a := smul_torsionBy a
#align submodule.torsion_by_is_torsion_by Submodule.torsionBy_isTorsionBy
@[simp]
theorem torsionBy_torsionBy_eq_top : torsionBy R (torsionBy R M a) a = ⊤ :=
(isTorsionBy_iff_torsionBy_eq_top a).mp <| torsionBy_isTorsionBy a
#align submodule.torsion_by_torsion_by_eq_top Submodule.torsionBy_torsionBy_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem torsionBySet_torsionBySet_eq_top : torsionBySet R (torsionBySet R M s) s = ⊤ :=
(isTorsionBySet_iff_torsionBySet_eq_top s).mp <| torsionBySet_isTorsionBySet s
#align submodule.torsion_by_set_torsion_by_set_eq_top Submodule.torsionBySet_torsionBySet_eq_top
variable (R M)
theorem torsion_gc :
@GaloisConnection (Submodule R M) (Ideal R)ᵒᵈ _ _ annihilator fun I =>
torsionBySet R M ↑(OrderDual.ofDual I) :=
fun _ _ =>
⟨fun h x hx => (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mpr fun ⟨_, ha⟩ => mem_annihilator.mp (h ha) x hx,
fun h a ha => mem_annihilator.mpr fun _ hx => (mem_torsionBySet_iff _ _).mp (h hx) ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
#align submodule.torsion_gc Submodule.torsion_gc
variable {R M}
section Coprime
variable {ι : Type*} {p : ι → Ideal R} {S : Finset ι}
variable (hp : (S : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => p i ⊔ p j = ⊤)
-- Porting note: mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum now requires DecidableEq ι
theorem iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf :
⨆ i ∈ S, torsionBySet R M (p i) = torsionBySet R M ↑(⨅ i ∈ S, p i) := by
rcases S.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h
· simp only [h]
-- Porting note: converts were not cooperating
convert iSup_emptyset (f := fun i => torsionBySet R M (p i)) <;> simp
apply le_antisymm
· apply iSup_le _
intro i
apply iSup_le _
intro is
apply torsionBySet_le_torsionBySet_of_subset
exact (iInf_le (fun i => ⨅ _ : i ∈ S, p i) i).trans (iInf_le _ is)
· intro x hx
rw [mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum]
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ :=
(mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum _ _).mp
((Ideal.eq_top_iff_one _).mp <| (Ideal.iSup_iInf_eq_top_iff_pairwise h _).mpr hp)
refine ⟨fun i => ⟨(μ i : R) • x, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_torsionBySet_iff] at hx ⊢
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [smul_smul]
suffices a * μ i ∈ ⨅ i ∈ S, p i from hx ⟨_, this⟩
rw [mem_iInf]
intro j
rw [mem_iInf]
intro hj
by_cases ij : j = i
· rw [ij]
exact Ideal.mul_mem_right _ _ ha
· have := coe_mem (μ i)
simp only [mem_iInf] at this
exact Ideal.mul_mem_left _ _ (this j hj ij)
· rw [← Finset.sum_smul, hμ, one_smul]
#align submodule.supr_torsion_by_ideal_eq_torsion_by_infi Submodule.iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf
-- Porting note: iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf now requires DecidableEq ι
theorem supIndep_torsionBySet_ideal : S.SupIndep fun i => torsionBySet R M <| p i :=
fun T hT i hi hiT => by
rw [disjoint_iff, Finset.sup_eq_iSup,
iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf fun i hi j hj ij => hp (hT hi) (hT hj) ij]
have := GaloisConnection.u_inf
(b₁ := OrderDual.toDual (p i)) (b₂ := OrderDual.toDual (⨅ i ∈ T, p i)) (torsion_gc R M)
dsimp at this ⊢
rw [← this, Ideal.sup_iInf_eq_top, top_coe, torsionBySet_univ]
intro j hj; apply hp hi (hT hj); rintro rfl; exact hiT hj
#align submodule.sup_indep_torsion_by_ideal Submodule.supIndep_torsionBySet_ideal
variable {q : ι → R} (hq : (S : Set ι).Pairwise <| (IsCoprime on q))
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Torsion.lean | 452 | 462 | theorem iSup_torsionBy_eq_torsionBy_prod :
⨆ i ∈ S, torsionBy R M (q i) = torsionBy R M (∏ i ∈ S, q i) := by |
rw [← torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq, Ideal.submodule_span_eq, ←
Ideal.finset_inf_span_singleton _ _ hq, Finset.inf_eq_iInf, ←
iSup_torsionBySet_ideal_eq_torsionBySet_iInf]
· congr
ext : 1
congr
ext : 1
exact (torsionBySet_span_singleton_eq _).symm
exact fun i hi j hj ij => (Ideal.sup_eq_top_iff_isCoprime _ _).mpr (hq hi hj ij)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
#align_import analysis.calculus.extend_deriv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Extending differentiability to the boundary
We investigate how differentiable functions inside a set extend to differentiable functions
on the boundary. For this, it suffices that the function and its derivative admit limits there.
A general version of this statement is given in `has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv`.
One-dimensional versions, in which one wants to obtain differentiability at the left endpoint or
the right endpoint of an interval, are given in
`has_deriv_at_interval_left_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv` and
`has_deriv_at_interval_right_endpoint_of_tendsto_deriv`. These versions are formulated in terms
of the one-dimensional derivative `deriv ℝ f`.
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace ℝ F]
open Filter Set Metric ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped Topology
attribute [local mono] Set.prod_mono
/-- If a function `f` is differentiable in a convex open set and continuous on its closure, and its
derivative converges to a limit `f'` at a point on the boundary, then `f` is differentiable there
with derivative `f'`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Extend.lean | 37 | 106 | theorem has_fderiv_at_boundary_of_tendsto_fderiv {f : E → F} {s : Set E} {x : E} {f' : E →L[ℝ] F}
(f_diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f s) (s_conv : Convex ℝ s) (s_open : IsOpen s)
(f_cont : ∀ y ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt f s y)
(h : Tendsto (fun y => fderiv ℝ f y) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 f')) :
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' (closure s) x := by |
classical
-- one can assume without loss of generality that `x` belongs to the closure of `s`, as the
-- statement is empty otherwise
by_cases hx : x ∉ closure s
· rw [← closure_closure] at hx; exact hasFDerivWithinAt_of_nmem_closure hx
push_neg at hx
rw [HasFDerivWithinAt, hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO, Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff]
/- One needs to show that `‖f y - f x - f' (y - x)‖ ≤ ε ‖y - x‖` for `y` close to `x` in
`closure s`, where `ε` is an arbitrary positive constant. By continuity of the functions, it
suffices to prove this for nearby points inside `s`. In a neighborhood of `x`, the derivative
of `f` is arbitrarily close to `f'` by assumption. The mean value inequality completes the
proof. -/
intro ε ε_pos
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδ⟩ : ∃ δ > 0, ∀ y ∈ s, dist y x < δ → ‖fderiv ℝ f y - f'‖ < ε := by
simpa [dist_zero_right] using tendsto_nhdsWithin_nhds.1 h ε ε_pos
set B := ball x δ
suffices ∀ y ∈ B ∩ closure s, ‖f y - f x - (f' y - f' x)‖ ≤ ε * ‖y - x‖ from
mem_nhdsWithin_iff.2 ⟨δ, δ_pos, fun y hy => by simpa using this y hy⟩
suffices
∀ p : E × E,
p ∈ closure ((B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s)) → ‖f p.2 - f p.1 - (f' p.2 - f' p.1)‖ ≤ ε * ‖p.2 - p.1‖ by
rw [closure_prod_eq] at this
intro y y_in
apply this ⟨x, y⟩
have : B ∩ closure s ⊆ closure (B ∩ s) := isOpen_ball.inter_closure
exact ⟨this ⟨mem_ball_self δ_pos, hx⟩, this y_in⟩
have key : ∀ p : E × E, p ∈ (B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s) →
‖f p.2 - f p.1 - (f' p.2 - f' p.1)‖ ≤ ε * ‖p.2 - p.1‖ := by
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
have conv : Convex ℝ (B ∩ s) := (convex_ball _ _).inter s_conv
have diff : DifferentiableOn ℝ f (B ∩ s) := f_diff.mono inter_subset_right
have bound : ∀ z ∈ B ∩ s, ‖fderivWithin ℝ f (B ∩ s) z - f'‖ ≤ ε := by
intro z z_in
have h := hδ z
have : fderivWithin ℝ f (B ∩ s) z = fderiv ℝ f z := by
have op : IsOpen (B ∩ s) := isOpen_ball.inter s_open
rw [DifferentiableAt.fderivWithin _ (op.uniqueDiffOn z z_in)]
exact (diff z z_in).differentiableAt (IsOpen.mem_nhds op z_in)
rw [← this] at h
exact le_of_lt (h z_in.2 z_in.1)
simpa using conv.norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_fderivWithin_le' diff bound u_in v_in
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ uv_in
have f_cont' : ∀ y ∈ closure s, ContinuousWithinAt (f - ⇑f') s y := by
intro y y_in
exact Tendsto.sub (f_cont y y_in) f'.cont.continuousWithinAt
refine ContinuousWithinAt.closure_le uv_in ?_ ?_ key
all_goals
-- common start for both continuity proofs
have : (B ∩ s) ×ˢ (B ∩ s) ⊆ s ×ˢ s := by mono <;> exact inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨u_in, v_in⟩ : u ∈ closure s ∧ v ∈ closure s := by
simpa [closure_prod_eq] using closure_mono this uv_in
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mono _ this
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt]
· rw [nhdsWithin_prod_eq]
have : ∀ u v, f v - f u - (f' v - f' u) = f v - f' v - (f u - f' u) := by intros; abel
simp only [this]
exact
Tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuousAt
((Tendsto.comp (f_cont' v v_in) tendsto_snd).sub <|
Tendsto.comp (f_cont' u u_in) tendsto_fst)
· apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact
tendsto_const_nhds.mul
(Tendsto.comp continuous_norm.continuousAt <| tendsto_snd.sub tendsto_fst)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
#align_import field_theory.minpoly.field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cbdf7b565832144d024caa5a550117c6df0204a5"
/-!
# Minimal polynomials on an algebra over a field
This file specializes the theory of minpoly to the setting of field extensions
and derives some well-known properties, amongst which the fact that minimal polynomials
are irreducible, and uniquely determined by their defining property.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial Set Function minpoly
namespace minpoly
variable {A B : Type*}
variable (A) [Field A]
section Ring
variable [Ring B] [Algebra A B] (x : B)
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a nonzero polynomial `p`, then the degree of `p` is at least the
degree of the minimal polynomial of `x`. See also `minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed.degree_le_of_ne_zero`
which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem degree_le_of_ne_zero {p : A[X]} (pnz : p ≠ 0) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) :
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree p :=
calc
degree (minpoly A x) ≤ degree (p * C (leadingCoeff p)⁻¹) :=
min A x (monic_mul_leadingCoeff_inv pnz) (by simp [hp])
_ = degree p := degree_mul_leadingCoeff_inv p pnz
#align minpoly.degree_le_of_ne_zero minpoly.degree_le_of_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_finite (e : B) [FiniteDimensional A B] : minpoly A e ≠ 0 :=
minpoly.ne_zero <| .of_finite A _
#align minpoly.ne_zero_of_finite_field_extension minpoly.ne_zero_of_finite
/-- The minimal polynomial of an element `x` is uniquely characterized by its defining property:
if there is another monic polynomial of minimal degree that has `x` as a root, then this polynomial
is equal to the minimal polynomial of `x`. See also `minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed.Minpoly.unique`
which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem unique {p : A[X]} (pmonic : p.Monic) (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0)
(pmin : ∀ q : A[X], q.Monic → Polynomial.aeval x q = 0 → degree p ≤ degree q) :
p = minpoly A x := by
have hx : IsIntegral A x := ⟨p, pmonic, hp⟩
symm; apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
by_contra hnz
apply degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz (by simp [hp]) |>.not_lt
apply degree_sub_lt _ (minpoly.ne_zero hx)
· rw [(monic hx).leadingCoeff, pmonic.leadingCoeff]
· exact le_antisymm (min A x pmonic hp) (pmin (minpoly A x) (monic hx) (aeval A x))
#align minpoly.unique minpoly.unique
/-- If an element `x` is a root of a polynomial `p`, then the minimal polynomial of `x` divides `p`.
See also `minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd` which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for
stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
theorem dvd {p : A[X]} (hp : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) : minpoly A x ∣ p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp only [hp0, dvd_zero]
have hx : IsIntegral A x := IsAlgebraic.isIntegral ⟨p, hp0, hp⟩
rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (monic hx)]
by_contra hnz
apply degree_le_of_ne_zero A x hnz
((aeval_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root (monic hx) (aeval _ _)).trans hp) |>.not_lt
exact degree_modByMonic_lt _ (monic hx)
#align minpoly.dvd minpoly.dvd
variable {A x} in
lemma dvd_iff {p : A[X]} : minpoly A x ∣ p ↔ Polynomial.aeval x p = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ ↦ by rw [hq, map_mul, aeval, zero_mul], minpoly.dvd A x⟩
theorem isRadical [IsReduced B] : IsRadical (minpoly A x) := fun n p dvd ↦ by
rw [dvd_iff] at dvd ⊢; rw [map_pow] at dvd; exact IsReduced.eq_zero _ ⟨n, dvd⟩
theorem dvd_map_of_isScalarTower (A K : Type*) {R : Type*} [CommRing A] [Field K] [CommRing R]
[Algebra A K] [Algebra A R] [Algebra K R] [IsScalarTower A K R] (x : R) :
minpoly K x ∣ (minpoly A x).map (algebraMap A K) := by
refine minpoly.dvd K x ?_
rw [aeval_map_algebraMap, minpoly.aeval]
#align minpoly.dvd_map_of_is_scalar_tower minpoly.dvd_map_of_isScalarTower
theorem dvd_map_of_isScalarTower' (R : Type*) {S : Type*} (K L : Type*) [CommRing R]
[CommRing S] [Field K] [CommRing L] [Algebra R S] [Algebra R K] [Algebra S L] [Algebra K L]
[Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] [IsScalarTower R S L] (s : S) :
minpoly K (algebraMap S L s) ∣ map (algebraMap R K) (minpoly R s) := by
apply minpoly.dvd K (algebraMap S L s)
rw [← map_aeval_eq_aeval_map, minpoly.aeval, map_zero]
rw [← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_eq]
#align minpoly.dvd_map_of_is_scalar_tower' minpoly.dvd_map_of_isScalarTower'
/-- If `y` is a conjugate of `x` over a field `K`, then it is a conjugate over a subring `R`. -/
theorem aeval_of_isScalarTower (R : Type*) {K T U : Type*} [CommRing R] [Field K] [CommRing T]
[Algebra R K] [Algebra K T] [Algebra R T] [IsScalarTower R K T] [CommSemiring U] [Algebra K U]
[Algebra R U] [IsScalarTower R K U] (x : T) (y : U)
(hy : Polynomial.aeval y (minpoly K x) = 0) : Polynomial.aeval y (minpoly R x) = 0 :=
aeval_map_algebraMap K y (minpoly R x) ▸
eval₂_eq_zero_of_dvd_of_eval₂_eq_zero (algebraMap K U) y
(minpoly.dvd_map_of_isScalarTower R K x) hy
#align minpoly.aeval_of_is_scalar_tower minpoly.aeval_of_isScalarTower
/-- See also `minpoly.ker_eval` which relaxes the assumptions on `A` in exchange for
stronger assumptions on `B`. -/
@[simp]
lemma ker_aeval_eq_span_minpoly :
RingHom.ker (Polynomial.aeval x) = A[X] ∙ minpoly A x := by
ext p
simp_rw [RingHom.mem_ker, ← minpoly.dvd_iff, Submodule.mem_span_singleton,
dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, smul_eq_mul, eq_comm (a := p)]
variable {A x}
theorem eq_of_irreducible_of_monic [Nontrivial B] {p : A[X]} (hp1 : Irreducible p)
(hp2 : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) (hp3 : p.Monic) : p = minpoly A x :=
let ⟨_, hq⟩ := dvd A x hp2
eq_of_monic_of_associated hp3 (monic ⟨p, ⟨hp3, hp2⟩⟩) <|
mul_one (minpoly A x) ▸ hq.symm ▸ Associated.mul_left _
(associated_one_iff_isUnit.2 <| (hp1.isUnit_or_isUnit hq).resolve_left <| not_isUnit A x)
#align minpoly.eq_of_irreducible_of_monic minpoly.eq_of_irreducible_of_monic
theorem eq_of_irreducible [Nontrivial B] {p : A[X]} (hp1 : Irreducible p)
(hp2 : Polynomial.aeval x p = 0) : p * C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹ = minpoly A x := by
have : p.leadingCoeff ≠ 0 := leadingCoeff_ne_zero.mpr hp1.ne_zero
apply eq_of_irreducible_of_monic
· exact Associated.irreducible ⟨⟨C p.leadingCoeff⁻¹, C p.leadingCoeff,
by rwa [← C_mul, inv_mul_cancel, C_1], by rwa [← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel, C_1]⟩, rfl⟩ hp1
· rw [aeval_mul, hp2, zero_mul]
· rwa [Polynomial.Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, mul_inv_cancel]
#align minpoly.eq_of_irreducible minpoly.eq_of_irreducible
theorem add_algebraMap {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] {x : B} (hx : IsIntegral A x)
(a : A) : minpoly A (x + algebraMap A B a) = (minpoly A x).comp (X - C a) := by
refine (minpoly.unique _ _ ((minpoly.monic hx).comp_X_sub_C _) ?_ fun q qmo hq => ?_).symm
· simp [aeval_comp]
· have : (Polynomial.aeval x) (q.comp (X + C a)) = 0 := by simpa [aeval_comp] using hq
have H := minpoly.min A x (qmo.comp_X_add_C _) this
rw [degree_eq_natDegree qmo.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree ((minpoly.monic hx).comp_X_sub_C _).ne_zero, natDegree_comp,
natDegree_X_sub_C, mul_one]
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree (minpoly.ne_zero hx),
degree_eq_natDegree (qmo.comp_X_add_C _).ne_zero, natDegree_comp,
natDegree_X_add_C, mul_one] at H
#align minpoly.add_algebra_map minpoly.add_algebraMap
theorem sub_algebraMap {B : Type*} [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] {x : B} (hx : IsIntegral A x)
(a : A) : minpoly A (x - algebraMap A B a) = (minpoly A x).comp (X + C a) := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using add_algebraMap hx (-a)
#align minpoly.sub_algebra_map minpoly.sub_algebraMap
section AlgHomFintype
/-- A technical finiteness result. -/
noncomputable def Fintype.subtypeProd {E : Type*} {X : Set E} (hX : X.Finite) {L : Type*}
(F : E → Multiset L) : Fintype (∀ x : X, { l : L // l ∈ F x }) :=
@Pi.fintype _ _ _ (Finite.fintype hX) _
#align minpoly.fintype.subtype_prod minpoly.Fintype.subtypeProd
variable (F E K : Type*) [Field F] [Ring E] [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [Algebra F E] [Algebra F K]
[FiniteDimensional F E]
-- Porting note (#11083): removed `noncomputable!` since it seems not to be slow in lean 4,
-- though it isn't very computable in practice (since neither `finrank` nor `finBasis` are).
/-- Function from Hom_K(E,L) to pi type Π (x : basis), roots of min poly of x -/
def rootsOfMinPolyPiType (φ : E →ₐ[F] K)
(x : range (FiniteDimensional.finBasis F E : _ → E)) :
{ l : K // l ∈ (minpoly F x.1).aroots K } :=
⟨φ x, by
rw [mem_roots_map (minpoly.ne_zero_of_finite F x.val),
← aeval_def, aeval_algHom_apply, minpoly.aeval, map_zero]⟩
#align minpoly.roots_of_min_poly_pi_type minpoly.rootsOfMinPolyPiType
theorem aux_inj_roots_of_min_poly : Injective (rootsOfMinPolyPiType F E K) := by
intro f g h
-- needs explicit coercion on the RHS
suffices (f : E →ₗ[F] K) = (g : E →ₗ[F] K) by rwa [DFunLike.ext'_iff] at this ⊢
rw [funext_iff] at h
exact LinearMap.ext_on (FiniteDimensional.finBasis F E).span_eq fun e he =>
Subtype.ext_iff.mp (h ⟨e, he⟩)
#align minpoly.aux_inj_roots_of_min_poly minpoly.aux_inj_roots_of_min_poly
/-- Given field extensions `E/F` and `K/F`, with `E/F` finite, there are finitely many `F`-algebra
homomorphisms `E →ₐ[K] K`. -/
noncomputable instance AlgHom.fintype : Fintype (E →ₐ[F] K) :=
@Fintype.ofInjective _ _
(Fintype.subtypeProd (finite_range (FiniteDimensional.finBasis F E)) fun e =>
(minpoly F e).aroots K)
_ (aux_inj_roots_of_min_poly F E K)
#align minpoly.alg_hom.fintype minpoly.AlgHom.fintype
end AlgHomFintype
variable (B) [Nontrivial B]
/-- If `B/K` is a nontrivial algebra over a field, and `x` is an element of `K`,
then the minimal polynomial of `algebraMap K B x` is `X - C x`. -/
theorem eq_X_sub_C (a : A) : minpoly A (algebraMap A B a) = X - C a :=
eq_X_sub_C_of_algebraMap_inj a (algebraMap A B).injective
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align minpoly.eq_X_sub_C minpoly.eq_X_sub_C
theorem eq_X_sub_C' (a : A) : minpoly A a = X - C a :=
eq_X_sub_C A a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align minpoly.eq_X_sub_C' minpoly.eq_X_sub_C'
variable (A)
/-- The minimal polynomial of `0` is `X`. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Minpoly/Field.lean | 220 | 221 | theorem zero : minpoly A (0 : B) = X := by |
simpa only [add_zero, C_0, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_zero, RingHom.map_zero] using eq_X_sub_C B (0 : A)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.variables from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Variables of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the variable sets of a multivariate polynomial.
The *variable set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Finset` containing each $x \in X$
that appears in a monomial in $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.vars p` : the finset of variables occurring in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `vars p = {x, y, z}`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Vars
/-! ### `vars` -/
/-- `vars p` is the set of variables appearing in the polynomial `p` -/
def vars (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.toFinset
#align mv_polynomial.vars MvPolynomial.vars
theorem vars_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.vars = p.degrees.toFinset := by
rw [vars]
convert rfl
#align mv_polynomial.vars_def MvPolynomial.vars_def
@[simp]
theorem vars_0 : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
#align mv_polynomial.vars_0 MvPolynomial.vars_0
@[simp]
theorem vars_monomial (h : r ≠ 0) : (monomial s r).vars = s.support := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ h, Finsupp.toFinset_toMultiset]
#align mv_polynomial.vars_monomial MvPolynomial.vars_monomial
@[simp]
theorem vars_C : (C r : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = ∅ := by
classical rw [vars_def, degrees_C, Multiset.toFinset_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.vars_C MvPolynomial.vars_C
@[simp]
theorem vars_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).vars = {n} := by
rw [X, vars_monomial (one_ne_zero' R), Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℕ)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.vars_X MvPolynomial.vars_X
theorem mem_vars (i : σ) : i ∈ p.vars ↔ ∃ d ∈ p.support, i ∈ d.support := by
classical simp only [vars_def, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_degrees, mem_support_iff, exists_prop]
#align mv_polynomial.mem_vars MvPolynomial.mem_vars
theorem mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {x : σ →₀ ℕ} (H : x ∈ f.support)
{v : σ} (h : v ∉ vars f) : x v = 0 := by
contrapose! h
exact (mem_vars v).mpr ⟨x, H, Finsupp.mem_support_iff.mpr h⟩
#align mv_polynomial.mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero MvPolynomial.mem_support_not_mem_vars_zero
theorem vars_add_subset [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p + q).vars ⊆ p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
intro x hx
simp only [vars_def, Finset.mem_union, Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hx ⊢
simpa using Multiset.mem_of_le (degrees_add _ _) hx
#align mv_polynomial.vars_add_subset MvPolynomial.vars_add_subset
theorem vars_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.vars q.vars) :
(p + q).vars = p.vars ∪ q.vars := by
refine (vars_add_subset p q).antisymm fun x hx => ?_
simp only [vars_def, Multiset.disjoint_toFinset] at h hx ⊢
rwa [degrees_add_of_disjoint h, Multiset.toFinset_union]
#align mv_polynomial.vars_add_of_disjoint MvPolynomial.vars_add_of_disjoint
section Mul
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Variables.lean | 124 | 126 | theorem vars_mul [DecidableEq σ] (φ ψ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (φ * ψ).vars ⊆ φ.vars ∪ ψ.vars := by |
simp_rw [vars_def, ← Multiset.toFinset_add, Multiset.toFinset_subset]
exact Multiset.subset_of_le (degrees_mul φ ψ)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.Lattice
#align_import category_theory.subobject.limits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"956af7c76589f444f2e1313911bad16366ea476d"
/-!
# Specific subobjects
We define `equalizerSubobject`, `kernelSubobject` and `imageSubobject`, which are the subobjects
represented by the equalizer, kernel and image of (a pair of) morphism(s) and provide conditions
for `P.factors f`, where `P` is one of these special subobjects.
TODO: Add conditions for when `P` is a pullback subobject.
TODO: an iff characterisation of `(imageSubobject f).Factors h`
-/
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits CategoryTheory.Subobject Opposite
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
section Equalizer
variable (f g : X ⟶ Y) [HasEqualizer f g]
/-- The equalizer of morphisms `f g : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev equalizerSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (equalizer.ι f g)
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject
/-- The underlying object of `equalizerSubobject f g` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `equalizer f g`. -/
def equalizerSubobjectIso : (equalizerSubobject f g : C) ≅ equalizer f g :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (equalizer.ι f g)
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobjectIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).hom ≫ equalizer.ι f g = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow' :
(equalizerSubobjectIso f g).inv ≫ (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow = equalizer.ι f g := by
simp [equalizerSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow' CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow'
@[reassoc]
theorem equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp :
(equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ f = (equalizerSubobject f g).arrow ≫ g := by
rw [← equalizerSubobject_arrow, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, equalizer.condition]
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_arrow_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = h ≫ g) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h :=
⟨equalizer.lift h w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_factors
theorem equalizerSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(equalizerSubobject f g).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = h ≫ g :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, equalizerSubobject_arrow_comp,
Category.assoc],
equalizerSubobject_factors f g h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.equalizer_subobject_factors_iff CategoryTheory.Limits.equalizerSubobject_factors_iff
end Equalizer
section Kernel
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C] (f : X ⟶ Y) [HasKernel f]
/-- The kernel of a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` as a `Subobject X`. -/
abbrev kernelSubobject : Subobject X :=
Subobject.mk (kernel.ι f)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject
/-- The underlying object of `kernelSubobject f` is (up to isomorphism!)
the same as the chosen object `kernel f`. -/
def kernelSubobjectIso : (kernelSubobject f : C) ≅ kernel f :=
Subobject.underlyingIso (kernel.ι f)
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobjectIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).hom ≫ kernel.ι f = (kernelSubobject f).arrow := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject_arrow
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow' :
(kernelSubobjectIso f).inv ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = kernel.ι f := by
simp [kernelSubobjectIso]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_arrow' CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject_arrow'
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobject_arrow_comp : (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ f = 0 := by
rw [← kernelSubobject_arrow]
simp only [Category.assoc, kernel.condition, comp_zero]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_arrow_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject_arrow_comp
theorem kernelSubobject_factors {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h :=
⟨kernel.lift _ h w, by simp⟩
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_factors CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject_factors
theorem kernelSubobject_factors_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) :
(kernelSubobject f).Factors h ↔ h ≫ f = 0 :=
⟨fun w => by
rw [← Subobject.factorThru_arrow _ _ w, Category.assoc, kernelSubobject_arrow_comp,
comp_zero],
kernelSubobject_factors f h⟩
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_factors_iff CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobject_factors_iff
/-- A factorisation of `h : W ⟶ X` through `kernelSubobject f`, assuming `h ≫ f = 0`. -/
def factorThruKernelSubobject {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) : W ⟶ kernelSubobject f :=
(kernelSubobject f).factorThru h (kernelSubobject_factors f h w)
#align category_theory.limits.factor_thru_kernel_subobject CategoryTheory.Limits.factorThruKernelSubobject
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_arrow {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobject f).arrow = h := by
dsimp [factorThruKernelSubobject]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.factor_thru_kernel_subobject_comp_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_arrow
@[simp]
theorem factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_kernelSubobjectIso {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) (w : h ≫ f = 0) :
factorThruKernelSubobject f h w ≫ (kernelSubobjectIso f).hom = kernel.lift f h w :=
(cancel_mono (kernel.ι f)).1 <| by simp
#align category_theory.limits.factor_thru_kernel_subobject_comp_kernel_subobject_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.factorThruKernelSubobject_comp_kernelSubobjectIso
section
variable {f} {X' Y' : C} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} [HasKernel f']
/-- A commuting square induces a morphism between the kernel subobjects. -/
def kernelSubobjectMap (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
(kernelSubobject f : C) ⟶ (kernelSubobject f' : C) :=
Subobject.factorThru _ ((kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left)
(kernelSubobject_factors _ _ (by simp [sq.w]))
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_map CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobjectMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem kernelSubobjectMap_arrow (sq : Arrow.mk f ⟶ Arrow.mk f') :
kernelSubobjectMap sq ≫ (kernelSubobject f').arrow = (kernelSubobject f).arrow ≫ sq.left := by
simp [kernelSubobjectMap]
#align category_theory.limits.kernel_subobject_map_arrow CategoryTheory.Limits.kernelSubobjectMap_arrow
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Limits.lean | 164 | 164 | theorem kernelSubobjectMap_id : kernelSubobjectMap (𝟙 (Arrow.mk f)) = 𝟙 _ := by | aesop_cat
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Init.ZeroOne
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
#align_import data.set.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the core library.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the core
library, as well as extra lemmas for functions in the core library (empty set, univ, union,
intersection, insert, singleton, set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v w x
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebraSet : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align set.top_eq_univ Set.top_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.bot_eq_empty Set.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.sup_eq_union Set.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.inf_eq_inter Set.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.le_eq_subset Set.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.lt_eq_ssubset Set.lt_eq_ssubset
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.le_iff_subset Set.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.lt_iff_ssubset Set.lt_iff_ssubset
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.le HasSubset.Subset.le
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
#align has_ssubset.ssubset.lt HasSSubset.SSubset.lt
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift Set.PiSetCoe.canLift
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift' Set.PiSetCoe.canLift'
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.coe_eq_subtype Set.coe_eq_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
#align set.coe_set_of Set.coe_setOf
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align set_coe.forall SetCoe.forall
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align set_coe.exists SetCoe.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
#align set_coe.exists' SetCoe.exists'
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
#align set_coe.forall' SetCoe.forall'
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
#align set_coe_cast set_coe_cast
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
#align set_coe.ext SetCoe.ext
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
#align set_coe.ext_iff SetCoe.ext_iff
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
#align subtype.mem Subtype.mem
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
#align eq.subset Eq.subset
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
theorem ext_iff {s t : Set α} : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h x => by rw [h], ext⟩
#align set.ext_iff Set.ext_iff
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
#align set.mem_of_mem_of_subset Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
#align set.forall_in_swap Set.forall_in_swap
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_set_of Set.mem_setOf
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
#align has_mem.mem.out Membership.mem.out
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nmem_set_of_iff Set.nmem_setOf_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_mem_eq Set.setOf_mem_eq
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_set Set.setOf_set
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_app_iff Set.setOf_app_iff
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_def Set.mem_def
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
#align set.set_of_bijective Set.setOf_bijective
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_subset_set_of Set.setOf_subset_setOf
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_and Set.setOf_and
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_or Set.setOf_or
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
#align set.subset_def Set.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
#align set.ssubset_def Set.ssubset_def
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
#align set.subset.refl Set.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
#align set.subset.rfl Set.Subset.rfl
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
#align set.subset.trans Set.Subset.trans
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
#align set.mem_of_eq_of_mem Set.mem_of_eq_of_mem
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm Set.Subset.antisymm
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm_iff Set.Subset.antisymm_iff
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
#align set.eq_of_subset_of_subset Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
#align set.mem_of_subset_of_mem Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
#align set.not_mem_subset Set.not_mem_subset
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align set.not_subset Set.not_subset
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
#align set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset Set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
#align set.exists_of_ssubset Set.exists_of_ssubset
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
#align set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
#align set.ssubset_iff_of_subset Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
#align set.not_mem_empty Set.not_mem_empty
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_not_mem Set.not_not_mem
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
-- Porting note: we seem to need parentheses at `(↥s)`,
-- even if we increase the right precedence of `↥` in `Mathlib.Tactic.Coe`.
-- Porting note: removed `simp` as it is competing with `nonempty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty (↥s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align set.nonempty_coe_sort Set.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align set.nonempty.coe_sort Set.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nonempty_def Set.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_mem Set.nonempty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
#align set.nonempty.not_subset_empty Set.Nonempty.not_subset_empty
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
#align set.nonempty.some Set.Nonempty.some
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
#align set.nonempty.some_mem Set.Nonempty.some_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
#align set.nonempty.mono Set.Nonempty.mono
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_not_subset Set.nonempty_of_not_subset
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset Set.nonempty_of_ssubset
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.of_diff Set.Nonempty.of_diff
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset' Set.nonempty_of_ssubset'
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.nonempty.inl Set.Nonempty.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.nonempty.inr Set.Nonempty.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
#align set.union_nonempty Set.union_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.left Set.Nonempty.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
#align set.nonempty.right Set.Nonempty.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.inter_nonempty Set.inter_nonempty
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty Set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.univ_nonempty Set.univ_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
#align set.nonempty.to_subtype Set.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align set.nonempty.to_type Set.Nonempty.to_type
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
#align set.univ.nonempty Set.univ.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
#align set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
#align set.empty_def Set.empty_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_empty_iff_false Set.mem_empty_iff_false
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_false Set.setOf_false
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
#align set.empty_subset Set.empty_subset
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
#align set.subset_empty_iff Set.subset_empty_iff
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
#align set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
#align set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
#align set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty Set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
#align set.eq_empty_of_is_empty Set.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
#align set.unique_empty Set.uniqueEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
#align set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.ne_empty Set.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
#align set.not_nonempty_empty Set.not_nonempty_empty
-- Porting note: removing `@[simp]` as it is competing with `isEmpty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.is_empty_coe_sort Set.isEmpty_coe_sort
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
#align set.eq_empty_or_nonempty Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
#align set.subset_eq_empty Set.subset_eq_empty
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
#align set.ball_empty_iff Set.forall_mem_empty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_empty_iff := forall_mem_empty
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.empty_ssubset Set.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align set.nonempty.empty_ssubset Set.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_true Set.setOf_true
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
#align set.univ_eq_empty_iff Set.univ_eq_empty_iff
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
#align set.empty_ne_univ Set.empty_ne_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.subset_univ Set.subset_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
#align set.univ_subset_iff Set.univ_subset_iff
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
#align set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset Set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
#align set.eq_univ_iff_forall Set.eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
#align set.eq_univ_of_forall Set.eq_univ_of_forall
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
#align set.nonempty.eq_univ Set.Nonempty.eq_univ
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
#align set.eq_univ_of_subset Set.eq_univ_of_subset
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.exists_mem_of_nonempty Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem Set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem Set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
#align set.univ_unique Set.univ_unique
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
#align set.ssubset_univ_iff Set.ssubset_univ_iff
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
#align set.nontrivial_of_nonempty Set.nontrivial_of_nonempty
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.union_def Set.union_def
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
#align set.mem_union_left Set.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_union_right Set.mem_union_right
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
#align set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union Set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
#align set.mem_union.elim Set.MemUnion.elim
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_union Set.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
#align set.union_self Set.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => or_false_iff _
#align set.union_empty Set.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => false_or_iff _
#align set.empty_union Set.empty_union
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
#align set.union_comm Set.union_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.union_assoc Set.union_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
#align set.union_is_assoc Set.union_isAssoc
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
#align set.union_is_comm Set.union_isComm
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_left_comm Set.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
#align set.union_right_comm Set.union_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
#align set.union_eq_left_iff_subset Set.union_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
#align set.union_eq_right_iff_subset Set.union_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.subset_union_left Set.subset_union_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_union_right Set.subset_union_right
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
#align set.union_subset Set.union_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
#align set.union_subset_iff Set.union_subset_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.union_subset_union Set.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align set.union_subset_union_left Set.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align set.union_subset_union_right Set.union_subset_union_right
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_left Set.subset_union_of_subset_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_right Set.subset_union_of_subset_right
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align set.union_congr_left Set.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align set.union_congr_right Set.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_left Set.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_right Set.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
#align set.union_empty_iff Set.union_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
#align set.union_univ Set.union_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
#align set.univ_union Set.univ_union
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.inter_def Set.inter_def
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_inter_iff Set.mem_inter_iff
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.mem_inter Set.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_left Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_right Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
#align set.inter_self Set.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => and_false_iff _
#align set.inter_empty Set.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_inter Set.empty_inter
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.inter_comm Set.inter_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
#align set.inter_assoc Set.inter_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
#align set.inter_is_assoc Set.inter_isAssoc
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
#align set.inter_is_comm Set.inter_isComm
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
#align set.inter_left_comm Set.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
#align set.inter_right_comm Set.inter_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.inter_subset_left Set.inter_subset_left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
#align set.inter_subset_right Set.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
#align set.subset_inter Set.subset_inter
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
#align set.subset_inter_iff Set.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
#align set.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align set.inter_congr_left Set.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align set.inter_congr_right Set.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
#align set.inter_univ Set.inter_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
#align set.univ_inter Set.univ_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.inter_subset_inter Set.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
#align set.inter_subset_inter_left Set.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
#align set.inter_subset_inter_right Set.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
#align set.union_inter_cancel_left Set.union_inter_cancel_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
#align set.union_inter_cancel_right Set.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
#align set.inter_set_of_eq_sep Set.inter_setOf_eq_sep
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.set_of_inter_eq_sep Set.setOf_inter_eq_sep
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_left Set.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_right Set.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_left Set.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_right Set.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_left Set.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_right Set.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_left Set.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_right Set.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.union_union_union_comm Set.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_inter_comm Set.inter_inter_inter_comm
/-!
### Lemmas about `insert`
`insert α s` is the set `{α} ∪ s`.
-/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.insert_def Set.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x s := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_insert Set.subset_insert
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : x ∈ insert x s :=
Or.inl rfl
#align set.mem_insert Set.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : Set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_insert_of_mem Set.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
id
#align set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne : b ∈ insert a s → b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
Or.resolve_left
#align set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert : b ∈ insert a s → b ∉ s → b = a :=
Or.resolve_right
#align set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_insert_iff Set.mem_insert_iff
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_right_of_imp fun e => e.symm ▸ h
#align set.insert_eq_of_mem Set.insert_eq_of_mem
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem {s : Set α} (t : Set α) {a : α} : a ∉ s → s ≠ insert a t :=
mt fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
#align set.ne_insert_of_not_mem Set.ne_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align set.insert_eq_self Set.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align set.insert_ne_self Set.insert_ne_self
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_insert_iff, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align set.insert_subset Set.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha, hs⟩
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t := fun _ => Or.imp_right (@h _)
#align set.insert_subset_insert Set.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] theorem insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => ?_, insert_subset_insert⟩
rcases h (subset_insert _ _ hx) with (rfl | hxt)
exacts [(ha hx).elim, hxt]
#align set.insert_subset_insert_iff Set.insert_subset_insert_iff
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
forall₂_congr fun _ hb => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha
#align set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem ssubset_iff_insert {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := by
simp only [insert_subset_iff, exists_and_right, ssubset_def, not_subset]
aesop
#align set.ssubset_iff_insert Set.ssubset_iff_insert
theorem ssubset_insert {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_insert.2 ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align set.ssubset_insert Set.ssubset_insert
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.insert_comm Set.insert_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_insert _ _
#align set.insert_idem Set.insert_idem
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.insert_union Set.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_insert Set.union_insert
@[simp]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert a s⟩
#align set.insert_nonempty Set.insert_nonempty
instance (a : α) (s : Set α) : Nonempty (insert a s : Set α) :=
(insert_nonempty a s).to_subtype
theorem insert_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_and_left
#align set.insert_inter_distrib Set.insert_inter_distrib
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_or_distrib_left
#align set.insert_union_distrib Set.insert_union_distrib
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert a s) ha,
congr_arg (fun x => insert x s)⟩
#align set.insert_inj Set.insert_inj
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x)
(x) (h : x ∈ s) : P x :=
H _ (Or.inr h)
#align set.forall_of_forall_insert Set.forall_of_forall_insert
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a)
(x) (h : x ∈ insert a s) : P x :=
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ ha) (H _)
#align set.forall_insert_of_forall Set.forall_insert_of_forall
/- Porting note: ∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x is parsed as ∃ x, x ∈ insert a s ∧ P x,
where in Lean3 it was parsed as `∃ x, ∃ (h : x ∈ insert a s), P x` -/
theorem exists_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ (P a ∨ ∃ x ∈ s, P x) := by
simp [mem_insert_iff, or_and_right, exists_and_left, exists_or]
#align set.bex_insert_iff Set.exists_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias bex_insert_iff := exists_mem_insert
theorem forall_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
forall₂_or_left.trans <| and_congr_left' forall_eq
#align set.ball_insert_iff Set.forall_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_insert_iff := forall_mem_insert
/-! ### Lemmas about singletons -/
/- porting note: instance was in core in Lean3 -/
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Set α) :=
⟨fun x => Set.ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, mem_insert_iff, or_false]
exact Iff.rfl⟩
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) = insert a ∅ :=
(insert_emptyc_eq a).symm
#align set.singleton_def Set.singleton_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : Set α) ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_singleton_iff Set.mem_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { n | n = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton' {a : α} : { x | a = x } = {a} :=
ext fun _ => eq_comm
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton' Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton'
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
--Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute
theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Set α) :=
@rfl _ _
#align set.mem_singleton Set.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Set α)) : x = y :=
h
#align set.eq_of_mem_singleton Set.eq_of_mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : Set α) ↔ x = y :=
ext_iff.trans eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
#align set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
singleton_eq_singleton_iff.mp
#align set.singleton_injective Set.singleton_injective
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : Set α) :=
H
#align set.mem_singleton_of_eq Set.mem_singleton_of_eq
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = ({x} : Set α) ∪ s :=
rfl
#align set.insert_eq Set.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, rfl⟩
#align set.singleton_nonempty Set.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty _).ne_empty
#align set.singleton_ne_empty Set.singleton_ne_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Set α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align set.empty_ssubset_singleton Set.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
forall_eq
#align set.singleton_subset_iff Set.singleton_subset_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align set.singleton_subset_singleton Set.singleton_subset_singleton
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { b | b = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton Set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_union Set.singleton_union
@[simp]
theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.union_singleton Set.union_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_nonempty : ({a} ∩ s).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, mem_inter_iff, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
#align set.singleton_inter_nonempty Set.singleton_inter_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_nonempty : (s ∩ {a}).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_singleton_nonempty Set.inter_singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans singleton_inter_nonempty.not
#align set.singleton_inter_eq_empty Set.singleton_inter_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
#align set.inter_singleton_eq_empty Set.inter_singleton_eq_empty
theorem nmem_singleton_empty {s : Set α} : s ∉ ({∅} : Set (Set α)) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.nmem_singleton_empty Set.nmem_singleton_empty
instance uniqueSingleton (a : α) : Unique (↥({a} : Set α)) :=
⟨⟨⟨a, mem_singleton a⟩⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.eq h⟩
#align set.unique_singleton Set.uniqueSingleton
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_comm.trans <| and_congr_left' singleton_subset_iff
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.trans <|
and_congr_left fun H => ⟨fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => H x h ▸ h⟩
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
-- while `simp` is capable of proving this, it is not capable of turning the LHS into the RHS.
@[simp]
theorem default_coe_singleton (x : α) : (default : ({x} : Set α)) = ⟨x, rfl⟩ :=
rfl
#align set.default_coe_singleton Set.default_coe_singleton
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section Sep
variable {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } :=
⟨xs, px⟩
#align set.mem_sep Set.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem sep_mem_eq : { x ∈ s | x ∈ t } = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.sep_mem_eq Set.sep_mem_eq
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_sep_iff Set.mem_sep_iff
theorem sep_ext_iff : { x ∈ s | p x } = { x ∈ s | q x } ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
#align set.sep_ext_iff Set.sep_ext_iff
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : { x ∈ t | x ∈ s } = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
#align set.sep_eq_of_subset Set.sep_eq_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem sep_subset (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ s | p x } ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.sep_subset Set.sep_subset
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : { x ∈ s | p x } = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align set.sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true Set.sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : { x ∈ s | p x } = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false_iff, not_and]
#align set.sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false Set.sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_true : { x ∈ s | True } = s :=
inter_univ s
#align set.sep_true Set.sep_true
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_false : { x ∈ s | False } = ∅ :=
inter_empty s
#align set.sep_false Set.sep_false
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ (∅ : Set α) | p x } = ∅ :=
empty_inter {x | p x}
#align set.sep_empty Set.sep_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_univ : { x ∈ (univ : Set α) | p x } = { x | p x } :=
univ_inter {x | p x}
#align set.sep_univ Set.sep_univ
@[simp]
theorem sep_union : { x | (x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
union_inter_distrib_right { x | x ∈ s } { x | x ∈ t } p
#align set.sep_union Set.sep_union
@[simp]
theorem sep_inter : { x | (x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t {x | p x}
#align set.sep_inter Set.sep_inter
@[simp]
theorem sep_and : { x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s {x | p x} {x | q x}
#align set.sep_and Set.sep_and
@[simp]
theorem sep_or : { x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_union_distrib_left s p q
#align set.sep_or Set.sep_or
@[simp]
theorem sep_setOf : { x ∈ { y | p y } | q x } = { x | p x ∧ q x } :=
rfl
#align set.sep_set_of Set.sep_setOf
end Sep
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {α : Type*} {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.subset_singleton_iff Set.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff_eq {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨fun _ => Or.inl rfl, fun _ => empty_subset _⟩
· simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, hs, hs.ne_empty]
#align set.subset_singleton_iff_eq Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq
theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff (h : s.Nonempty) : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff_eq.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Set.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊂ {x} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [ssubset_iff_subset_ne, subset_singleton_iff_eq, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h => h ▸ (singleton_ne_empty _).symm
#align set.ssubset_singleton_iff Set.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Set α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton {α} [Subsingleton α] (s t : Set α) [Nonempty s]
[Nonempty t] : s = t :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.trans nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.symm
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {α} [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} (t : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) [Nonempty t] : s = t :=
have := hs.to_subtype; eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton s t
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_zero [Subsingleton α] [Zero α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {0} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {0} h
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_one [Subsingleton α] [One α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {1} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {1} h
/-! ### Disjointness -/
protected theorem disjoint_iff : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le
#align set.disjoint_iff Set.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
theorem _root_.Disjoint.inter_eq : Disjoint s t → s ∩ t = ∅ :=
Disjoint.eq_bot
#align disjoint.inter_eq Disjoint.inter_eq
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => not_and
#align set.disjoint_left Set.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align set.disjoint_right Set.disjoint_right
lemma not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Set.disjoint_iff.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ not_not
#align set.not_disjoint_iff Set.not_disjoint_iff
lemma not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬ Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := not_disjoint_iff
#align set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align set.nonempty.not_disjoint Set.Nonempty.not_disjoint
lemma disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Set α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
(em _).imp_right not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter.1
#align set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
lemma disjoint_iff_forall_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ t → a ≠ b := by
simp only [Ne, disjoint_left, @imp_not_comm _ (_ = _), forall_eq']
#align set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne Set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne
alias ⟨_root_.Disjoint.ne_of_mem, _⟩ := disjoint_iff_forall_ne
#align disjoint.ne_of_mem Disjoint.ne_of_mem
lemma disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_left h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_left Set.disjoint_of_subset_left
lemma disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_right h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_right Set.disjoint_of_subset_right
lemma disjoint_of_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h : Disjoint s₂ t₂) : Disjoint s₁ t₁ :=
h.mono hs ht
#align set.disjoint_of_subset Set.disjoint_of_subset
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := disjoint_sup_left
#align set.disjoint_union_left Set.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := disjoint_sup_right
#align set.disjoint_union_right Set.disjoint_union_right
@[simp] lemma disjoint_empty (s : Set α) : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
#align set.disjoint_empty Set.disjoint_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_disjoint (s : Set α) : Disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
#align set.empty_disjoint Set.empty_disjoint
@[simp] lemma univ_disjoint : Disjoint univ s ↔ s = ∅ := top_disjoint
#align set.univ_disjoint Set.univ_disjoint
@[simp] lemma disjoint_univ : Disjoint s univ ↔ s = ∅ := disjoint_top
#align set.disjoint_univ Set.disjoint_univ
lemma disjoint_sdiff_left : Disjoint (t \ s) s := disjoint_sdiff_self_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_left Set.disjoint_sdiff_left
lemma disjoint_sdiff_right : Disjoint s (t \ s) := disjoint_sdiff_self_right
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_right Set.disjoint_sdiff_right
-- TODO: prove this in terms of a lattice lemma
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_inter Set.disjoint_sdiff_inter
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
#align set.diff_union_diff_cancel Set.diff_union_diff_cancel
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
#align set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union Set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union
@[simp default+1]
lemma disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s := by simp [Set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]
#align set.disjoint_singleton_left Set.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align set.disjoint_singleton_right Set.disjoint_singleton_right
lemma disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Set α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
simp
#align set.disjoint_singleton Set.disjoint_singleton
lemma subset_diff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u := le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align set.subset_diff Set.subset_diff
lemma ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t \ {a} := by
simp [ssubset_iff_insert, subset_diff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_left Set.inter_diff_distrib_left
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_right Set.inter_diff_distrib_right
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_def Set.compl_def
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
#align set.mem_compl Set.mem_compl
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_set_of Set.compl_setOf
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_compl Set.not_mem_of_mem_compl
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_mem_compl_iff Set.not_mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
#align set.inter_compl_self Set.inter_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
#align set.compl_inter_self Set.compl_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
#align set.compl_empty Set.compl_empty
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
#align set.compl_union Set.compl_union
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
#align set.compl_inter Set.compl_inter
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
#align set.compl_univ Set.compl_univ
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
#align set.compl_empty_iff Set.compl_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
#align set.compl_univ_iff Set.compl_univ_iff
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.compl_ne_univ Set.compl_ne_univ
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
#align set.nonempty_compl Set.nonempty_compl
@[simp] lemma nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : Set.Nonempty {x}ᶜ := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_ne x
exact ⟨y, by simp [hy]⟩
theorem mem_compl_singleton_iff {a x : α} : x ∈ ({a} : Set α)ᶜ ↔ x ≠ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_compl_singleton_iff Set.mem_compl_singleton_iff
theorem compl_singleton_eq (a : α) : ({a} : Set α)ᶜ = { x | x ≠ a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_singleton_eq Set.compl_singleton_eq
@[simp]
theorem compl_ne_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({ x | x ≠ a } : Set α)ᶜ = {a} :=
compl_compl _
#align set.compl_ne_eq_singleton Set.compl_ne_eq_singleton
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
#align set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl Set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
#align set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl Set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
#align set.union_compl_self Set.union_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
#align set.compl_union_self Set.compl_union_self
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
#align set.compl_subset_comm Set.compl_subset_comm
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
#align set.subset_compl_comm Set.subset_compl_comm
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.compl_subset_compl Set.compl_subset_compl
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint t s :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_left (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_right (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset : Disjoint sᶜ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
disjoint_compl_left_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset : Disjoint s tᶜ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
disjoint_compl_right_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_right⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.subset_compl_right Disjoint.subset_compl_right
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_left⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.subset_compl_left Disjoint.subset_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left⟩ := disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_left HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right⟩ := disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_right HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
#align set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset Set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
#align set.compl_subset_iff_union Set.compl_subset_iff_union
@[simp]
theorem subset_compl_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s :=
subset_compl_comm.trans singleton_subset_iff
#align set.subset_compl_singleton_iff Set.subset_compl_singleton_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
#align set.inter_subset Set.inter_subset
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
#align set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff Set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
#align set.not_mem_diff_of_mem Set.not_mem_diff_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_diff Set.mem_of_mem_diff
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_diff Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
#align set.diff_eq_compl_inter Set.diff_eq_compl_inter
theorem nonempty_diff {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty_diff Set.nonempty_diff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
#align set.diff_subset Set.diff_subset
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
#align set.union_diff_cancel' Set.union_diff_cancel'
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align set.union_diff_cancel Set.union_diff_cancel
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_left Set.union_diff_cancel_left
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_right Set.union_diff_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align set.union_diff_left Set.union_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align set.union_diff_right Set.union_diff_right
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
#align set.union_diff_distrib Set.union_diff_distrib
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inf_sdiff_assoc
#align set.inter_diff_assoc Set.inter_diff_assoc
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
#align set.inter_diff_self Set.inter_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
#align set.inter_union_diff Set.inter_union_diff
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
#align set.diff_union_inter Set.diff_union_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
#align set.inter_union_compl Set.inter_union_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂ from sdiff_le_sdiff
#align set.diff_subset_diff Set.diff_subset_diff
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
#align set.diff_subset_diff_left Set.diff_subset_diff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : Set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
#align set.diff_subset_diff_right Set.diff_subset_diff_right
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : Set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
#align set.compl_eq_univ_diff Set.compl_eq_univ_diff
@[simp]
theorem empty_diff (s : Set α) : (∅ \ s : Set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
#align set.empty_diff Set.empty_diff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
#align set.diff_eq_empty Set.diff_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem diff_empty {s : Set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
#align set.diff_empty Set.diff_empty
@[simp]
theorem diff_univ (s : Set α) : s \ univ = ∅ :=
diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
#align set.diff_univ Set.diff_univ
theorem diff_diff {u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
#align set.diff_diff Set.diff_diff
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
theorem diff_diff_comm {s t u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
#align set.diff_diff_comm Set.diff_diff_comm
theorem diff_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u from sdiff_le_iff
#align set.diff_subset_iff Set.diff_subset_iff
theorem subset_diff_union (s t : Set α) : s ⊆ s \ t ∪ t :=
show s ≤ s \ t ∪ t from le_sdiff_sup
#align set.subset_diff_union Set.subset_diff_union
theorem diff_union_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ t ∪ t = s :=
Subset.antisymm (union_subset diff_subset h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
#align set.diff_union_of_subset Set.diff_union_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_subset_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} : s \ {x} ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ insert x t := by
rw [← union_singleton, union_comm]
apply diff_subset_iff
#align set.diff_singleton_subset_iff Set.diff_singleton_subset_iff
theorem subset_diff_singleton {x : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hx : x ∉ s) : s ⊆ t \ {x} :=
subset_inter h <| subset_compl_comm.1 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hx
#align set.subset_diff_singleton Set.subset_diff_singleton
theorem subset_insert_diff_singleton (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x (s \ {x}) := by
rw [← diff_singleton_subset_iff]
#align set.subset_insert_diff_singleton Set.subset_insert_diff_singleton
theorem diff_subset_comm {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t from sdiff_le_comm
#align set.diff_subset_comm Set.diff_subset_comm
theorem diff_inter {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
#align set.diff_inter Set.diff_inter
theorem diff_inter_diff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
#align set.diff_inter_diff Set.diff_inter_diff
theorem diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_compl
#align set.diff_compl Set.diff_compl
theorem diff_diff_right {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
#align set.diff_diff_right Set.diff_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_of_mem (s) (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t := by
ext
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_imp, h]
#align set.insert_diff_of_mem Set.insert_diff_of_mem
theorem insert_diff_of_not_mem (s) (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s \ t = insert a (s \ t) := by
classical
ext x
by_cases h' : x ∈ t
· have : x ≠ a := by
intro H
rw [H] at h'
exact h h'
simp [h, h', this]
· simp [h, h']
#align set.insert_diff_of_not_mem Set.insert_diff_of_not_mem
theorem insert_diff_self_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ {a} = s := by
ext x
simp [and_iff_left_of_imp fun hx : x ∈ s => show x ≠ a from fun hxa => h <| hxa ▸ hx]
#align set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem Set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_eq_singleton {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ s = {a} := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff,
or_false_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl
exact h
#align set.insert_diff_eq_singleton Set.insert_diff_eq_singleton
theorem inter_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ insert a t = insert a (s ∩ t) := by
rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align set.inter_insert_of_mem Set.inter_insert_of_mem
theorem insert_inter_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s ∩ t = insert a (s ∩ t) := by
rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align set.insert_inter_of_mem Set.insert_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ insert a t = s ∩ t :=
ext fun _ => and_congr_right fun hx => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align set.inter_insert_of_not_mem Set.inter_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
ext fun _ => and_congr_left fun hx => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align set.insert_inter_of_not_mem Set.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_self {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self _ _
#align set.union_diff_self Set.union_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : Set α} : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sdiff_sup_self _ _
#align set.diff_union_self Set.diff_union_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : Set α} : b \ a ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
#align set.diff_inter_self Set.diff_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
#align set.diff_inter_self_eq_diff Set.diff_inter_self_eq_diff
@[simp]
theorem diff_self_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
#align set.diff_self_inter Set.diff_self_inter
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_eq_self {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 <| by simp [h]
#align set.diff_singleton_eq_self Set.diff_singleton_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_sSubset {s : Set α} {a : α} : s \ {a} ⊂ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
sdiff_le.lt_iff_ne.trans <| sdiff_eq_left.not.trans <| by simp
#align set.diff_singleton_ssubset Set.diff_singleton_sSubset
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_singleton {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s := by
simp [insert_eq, union_diff_self, -union_singleton, -singleton_union]
#align set.insert_diff_singleton Set.insert_diff_singleton
theorem insert_diff_singleton_comm (hab : a ≠ b) (s : Set α) :
insert a (s \ {b}) = insert a s \ {b} := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, union_diff_distrib,
diff_singleton_eq_self (mem_singleton_iff.not.2 hab.symm)]
#align set.insert_diff_singleton_comm Set.insert_diff_singleton_comm
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem diff_self {s : Set α} : s \ s = ∅ :=
sdiff_self
#align set.diff_self Set.diff_self
theorem diff_diff_right_self (s t : Set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
#align set.diff_diff_right_self Set.diff_diff_right_self
theorem diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
#align set.diff_diff_cancel_left Set.diff_diff_cancel_left
theorem mem_diff_singleton {x y : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ s \ {y} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ≠ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_diff_singleton Set.mem_diff_singleton
theorem mem_diff_singleton_empty {t : Set (Set α)} : s ∈ t \ {∅} ↔ s ∈ t ∧ s.Nonempty :=
mem_diff_singleton.trans <| and_congr_right' nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.mem_diff_singleton_empty Set.mem_diff_singleton_empty
theorem subset_insert_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
s ⊆ insert x t ↔ s ⊆ t ∨ (x ∈ s ∧ s \ {x} ⊆ t) := by
rw [← diff_singleton_subset_iff]
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [and_iff_right hx, or_iff_right_of_imp diff_subset.trans]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hx, or_iff_left_of_imp And.right]
theorem union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
#align set.union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter Set.union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter
/-! ### Lemmas about pairs -/
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Set α) = {a} :=
union_self _
#align set.pair_eq_singleton Set.pair_eq_singleton
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Set α) = {b, a} :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.pair_comm Set.pair_comm
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 2,077 | 2,079 | theorem pair_eq_pair_iff {x y z w : α} :
({x, y} : Set α) = {z, w} ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by |
simp [subset_antisymm_iff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
#align_import measure_theory.function.locally_integrable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"08a4542bec7242a5c60f179e4e49de8c0d677b1b"
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.mono MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.norm MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.norm
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_on.locally_integrable_on MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.integrable_on_is_compact MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.integrable_on_compact_subset MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is either open, or closed, then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is integrable on
every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] (hs : IsClosed s ∨ IsOpen s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → (IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ) := by
-- The correct condition is that `s` be *locally closed*, i.e. for every `x ∈ s` there is some
-- `U ∈ 𝓝 x` such that `U ∩ s` is closed. But mathlib doesn't have locally closed sets yet.
refine ⟨fun hf k hk => hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx => ?_⟩
cases hs with
| inl hs =>
exact
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s h2K,
hf _ inter_subset_left
(hK.of_isClosed_subset (hs.inter hK.isClosed) inter_subset_right)⟩
| inr hs =>
obtain ⟨K, hK, h2K, h3K⟩ := exists_compact_subset hs hx
refine ⟨K, ?_, hf K h3K hK⟩
simpa only [IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq hs hx, interior_eq_nhds'] using h2K
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_iff MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_univ MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_univ
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable.locally_integrable_on MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
#align measure_theory.integrable.locally_integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable.locallyIntegrable
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 205 | 212 | theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by |
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
#align_import group_theory.order_of_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d07245fd37786daa997af4f1a73a49fa3b748408"
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
#align is_periodic_pt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one
#align is_periodic_pt_add_iff_nsmul_eq_zero isPeriodicPt_add_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
#align is_of_fin_order IsOfFinOrder
#align is_of_fin_add_order IsOfFinAddOrder
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_of_fin_add_order_of_mul_iff isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
#align is_of_fin_order_of_add_iff isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
#align is_of_fin_order_iff_pow_eq_one isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
#align is_of_fin_add_order_iff_nsmul_eq_zero isOfFinAddOrder_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [Group G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
cases' (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
#align not_is_of_fin_order_of_injective_pow not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow
#align not_is_of_fin_add_order_of_injective_nsmul not_isOfFinAddOrder_of_injective_nsmul
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
#align is_of_fin_order_iff_coe Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe
#align is_of_fin_add_order_iff_coe AddSubmonoid.isOfFinAddOrder_coe
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
#align monoid_hom.is_of_fin_order MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder
#align add_monoid_hom.is_of_fin_order AddMonoidHom.isOfFinAddOrder
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
#align is_of_fin_order.apply IsOfFinOrder.apply
#align is_of_fin_add_order.apply IsOfFinAddOrder.apply
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
#align is_of_fin_order_one isOfFinOrder_one
#align is_of_fin_order_zero isOfFinAddOrder_zero
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
#align order_of orderOf
#align add_order_of addOrderOf
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
#align add_order_of_of_mul_eq_order_of addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
#align order_of_of_add_eq_add_order_of orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
#align order_of_pos' IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
#align add_order_of_pos' IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
#align pow_order_of_eq_one pow_orderOf_eq_one
#align add_order_of_nsmul_eq_zero addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
#align order_of_eq_zero orderOf_eq_zero
#align add_order_of_eq_zero addOrderOf_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
#align order_of_eq_zero_iff orderOf_eq_zero_iff
#align add_order_of_eq_zero_iff addOrderOf_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 197 | 198 | theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by |
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearForm.Properties
/-!
# Bilinear form
This file defines orthogonal bilinear forms.
## Notations
Given any term `B` of type `BilinForm`, due to a coercion, can use
the notation `B x y` to refer to the function field, ie. `B x y = B.bilin x y`.
In this file we use the following type variables:
- `M`, `M'`, ... are modules over the commutative semiring `R`,
- `M₁`, `M₁'`, ... are modules over the commutative ring `R₁`,
- `V`, ... is a vector space over the field `K`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilinear_form>
## Tags
Bilinear form,
-/
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u v w
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {R₁ : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [AddCommGroup M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
variable {V : Type*} {K : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
variable {B : BilinForm R M} {B₁ : BilinForm R₁ M₁}
namespace LinearMap
namespace BilinForm
/-- The proposition that two elements of a bilinear form space are orthogonal. For orthogonality
of an indexed set of elements, use `BilinForm.iIsOrtho`. -/
def IsOrtho (B : BilinForm R M) (x y : M) : Prop :=
B x y = 0
#align bilin_form.is_ortho LinearMap.BilinForm.IsOrtho
theorem isOrtho_def {B : BilinForm R M} {x y : M} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B x y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align bilin_form.is_ortho_def LinearMap.BilinForm.isOrtho_def
theorem isOrtho_zero_left (x : M) : IsOrtho B (0 : M) x := LinearMap.isOrtho_zero_left B x
#align bilin_form.is_ortho_zero_left LinearMap.BilinForm.isOrtho_zero_left
theorem isOrtho_zero_right (x : M) : IsOrtho B x (0 : M) :=
zero_right x
#align bilin_form.is_ortho_zero_right LinearMap.BilinForm.isOrtho_zero_right
theorem ne_zero_of_not_isOrtho_self {B : BilinForm K V} (x : V) (hx₁ : ¬B.IsOrtho x x) : x ≠ 0 :=
fun hx₂ => hx₁ (hx₂.symm ▸ isOrtho_zero_left _)
#align bilin_form.ne_zero_of_not_is_ortho_self LinearMap.BilinForm.ne_zero_of_not_isOrtho_self
theorem IsRefl.ortho_comm (H : B.IsRefl) {x y : M} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
#align bilin_form.is_refl.ortho_comm LinearMap.BilinForm.IsRefl.ortho_comm
theorem IsAlt.ortho_comm (H : B₁.IsAlt) {x y : M₁} : IsOrtho B₁ x y ↔ IsOrtho B₁ y x :=
LinearMap.IsAlt.ortho_comm H
#align bilin_form.is_alt.ortho_comm LinearMap.BilinForm.IsAlt.ortho_comm
theorem IsSymm.ortho_comm (H : B.IsSymm) {x y : M} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
LinearMap.IsSymm.ortho_comm H
#align bilin_form.is_symm.ortho_comm LinearMap.BilinForm.IsSymm.ortho_comm
/-- A set of vectors `v` is orthogonal with respect to some bilinear form `B` if and only
if for all `i ≠ j`, `B (v i) (v j) = 0`. For orthogonality between two elements, use
`BilinForm.IsOrtho` -/
def iIsOrtho {n : Type w} (B : BilinForm R M) (v : n → M) : Prop :=
B.IsOrthoᵢ v
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align bilin_form.is_Ortho LinearMap.BilinForm.iIsOrtho
theorem iIsOrtho_def {n : Type w} {B : BilinForm R M} {v : n → M} :
B.iIsOrtho v ↔ ∀ i j : n, i ≠ j → B (v i) (v j) = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align bilin_form.is_Ortho_def LinearMap.BilinForm.iIsOrtho_def
section
variable {R₄ M₄ : Type*} [CommRing R₄] [IsDomain R₄]
variable [AddCommGroup M₄] [Module R₄ M₄] {G : BilinForm R₄ M₄}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/BilinearForm/Orthogonal.lean | 100 | 105 | theorem isOrtho_smul_left {x y : M₄} {a : R₄} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho G (a • x) y ↔ IsOrtho G x y := by |
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_smul]
simp only [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_eq_zero, or_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun a ↦ (ha a).elim
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
#align_import data.fintype.pi from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Fintype instances for pi types
-/
variable {α : Type*}
open Finset
namespace Fintype
variable [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] {γ δ : α → Type*} {s : ∀ a, Finset (γ a)}
/-- Given for all `a : α` a finset `t a` of `δ a`, then one can define the
finset `Fintype.piFinset t` of all functions taking values in `t a` for all `a`. This is the
analogue of `Finset.pi` where the base finset is `univ` (but formally they are not the same, as
there is an additional condition `i ∈ Finset.univ` in the `Finset.pi` definition). -/
def piFinset (t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)) : Finset (∀ a, δ a) :=
(Finset.univ.pi t).map ⟨fun f a => f a (mem_univ a), fun _ _ =>
by simp (config := {contextual := true}) [Function.funext_iff]⟩
#align fintype.pi_finset Fintype.piFinset
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Pi.lean | 34 | 42 | theorem mem_piFinset {t : ∀ a, Finset (δ a)} {f : ∀ a, δ a} : f ∈ piFinset t ↔ ∀ a, f a ∈ t a := by |
constructor
· simp only [piFinset, mem_map, and_imp, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, exists_imp,
mem_pi]
rintro g hg hgf a
rw [← hgf]
exact hg a
· simp only [piFinset, mem_map, forall_prop_of_true, exists_prop, mem_univ, mem_pi]
exact fun hf => ⟨fun a _ => f a, hf, rfl⟩
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.